20021_Glen_Raven_Phase II_20161021

October 21, 2016

Mr. Adam Short
City of Kinston 207 E. King Street
Kinston, North Carolina 28502

Subject: LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL 800 MANNING STREET
KINSTON, LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MID-ATLANTIC JOB NO. 000R2611.00 T4055

Dear Mr. Short:
We are pleased to present this Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report for the
above-referenced site. We appreciate the opportunity to provide environmental services
to the City of Kinston. Please contact me at 919-250-9918 if any questions arise or if we
may be of further service.
Sincerely,

MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, INC.

Darin M. McClure
Principal Engineer
Enclosure

LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL
800 MANNING STREET
KINSTON, LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

Prepared For: Mr. Adam Short
City of Kinston
207 E. King Street
Kinston, North Carolina 28502 Prepared By:

Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc.
409 Rogers View Court Raleigh, North Carolina 27610

Mid-Atlantic Job No. 000R2611.00 T4055

October 21, 2016

LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL
800 MANNING STREET
KINSTON, LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

Mid-Atlantic Associates Job No. 000R2611.00 T4055

October 21, 2016

Prepared For: Prepared By:
Mr. Adam Short MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
City of Kinston
207 E. King Street
Kinston, North Carolina 28502
Kelly G. Johnson, G.I.T.
Staff Scientist

Darin M. McClure
Principal Engineer

TABLE OF CONTENTS
DISTRIBUTION LIST

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Laboratories.......................................................................................................... 3
1.2 Driller .................................................................................................................... 3
1.3 Waste Disposal Contractor ................................................................................... 3
1.4 Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Survey Contractor ......... 3
2.0 SUMMARY OF FIELD ACTIVITIES .................................................................................. 4
2.1 Soil Sampling Activities ........................................................................................ 4
2.2 Groundwater Sampling Activities .......................................................................... 5 2.3 Vapor Intrusion Sampling Activities ...................................................................... 7
2.3 Drum Removal Activities ...................................................................................... 7
2.4 Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Survey Activities ............ 8
3.0 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ............................................................ 8
4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE ..................................................................................................11 4.1 Property-Specific Corrective Actions .................................................................. 11
4.2.1 Precision and Accuracy .................................................................... 12
4.2.2 Representativeness ......................................................................... 13
4.2.3 Completeness .................................................................................. 14
4.2.4 Comparability ................................................................................... 14 4.2.5 Sensitivity ......................................................................................... 14
4.3 Laboratory Data Evaluation ................................................................................ 15
4.3.1 Qualitative Data – Level A ................................................................ 16
4.3.2 Quantitative Data – Level B .............................................................. 17 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................17
6.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................19

DRAWINGS Drawing 1.1 Topographic Site Map
Drawing 1.2 Site Map
Drawing 2.1 Areas of Concern and Soil Boring, Sub-Slab Soil Gas, and
Monitoring Well Location Map Drawing 2.2 Estimated Water Table Contour Map – August 23, 2016

TABLES
Table 2.1 Water Level Measurements

TABLE OF CONTENTS – continued
Table 3.1 Summary of Chemical Constituents Detected in Soil
Table 3.2 Summary of Chemical Constituents Detected in Groundwater
Table 3.3 Summary of Chemical Constituents Detected in Sub-Slab Soil Gas
Table 3.4 Summary of Asbestos Containing Materials Survey Results Table 3.5 Summary of Lead-Based Paint Survey Results
Table 4.1 Soil Sample/Sample Duplicate Comparison: “SB-5” and “Duplicate”
Table 4.2 Groundwater Sample/Sample Duplicate Comparison: “MW-2” and
“Duplicate”
Table 4.3 Sub-Slab Soil Gas Sample/Sample Duplicate Comparison: “VP-5” and “Duplicate”

APPENDICES
Appendix A Soil Boring Logs and Permanent Monitoring Well Construction
Records
Appendix B Groundwater Monitoring Field Records Appendix C A&D Environmental Field Analysis Report Sheet (8/4/2016); Drum Profiles for Transport; and Bills of Lading/Material Manifests
Appendix D Matrix Health & Safety Consultants, LLC., Survey for the Presence
of Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints,
dated August 23, 2016 Appendix E Laboratory Analytical Reports and Chain-of-Custody Records

DISTRIBUTION LIST
The following personnel will receive a copy of this report:

Agency Number of Copies
Margaret Olson, Brownfields Project Manager United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Region 4, Atlanta Federal Building
Waste Management Division 61 Forsyth Street SW
Atlanta, GA 30303 Phone: [phone] Email: [e-mail]
1
Margaret Olson, EPA Designated Approving Official
(DAO)
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 4, Atlanta Federal Building
Waste Management Division
61 Forsyth Street SW Atlanta, GA 30303
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
1
Adam Short, Project Manager City of Kinston Post Office Box 339
Kinston, North Carolina 28502 Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
1
Daniel H. Nielsen, QA/QC Manager
Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc. 409 Rogers View Court Raleigh, NC 27610
Phone: [phone] Email: [e-mail]
1
Darin McClure, Project Manager Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc.
409 Rogers View Court
Raleigh, NC 27610 Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
1

1.0 INTRODUCTION
In accordance with the Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) dated April 22,
2015, and the Site Specific QAPP Addendum 3-A Revision 2 (SSQAPP) dated April 25,
2016, Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc. (Mid-Atlantic) has prepared this Limited
Environmental Site Assessment Report for the former Glen Raven Mill (the “subject site”) located at 800 Manning Street in Kinston, North Carolina (Drawing 1.1). The subject site
is a former textile mill situated on approximately 11.7 acres of land that operated as a
cotton/spinning mill since at least 1914 until approximately 2002. The mill is located adjacent
to the Neuse River (Drawing 1.1) in a generally industrial and residential area. The subject
site is assigned Parcel Identification No. 4525-1304-7216 and is owned by McConnell Holdings, Inc. (Drawing 1.2).

This Limited Environmental Site Assessment work was conducted based on the findings of
a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (PESA) completed on the subject site by Mid-
Atlantic and dated December 30, 2015. The report identified the following Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) associated with the subject site:
 The historical operation of the subject site as a cotton/spinning mill since at least
1914 until approximately 2002;
 The historical industrial use of the northeast adjacent property, including storage
and use of coal; and
 The documented release of petroleum and historical use of the west adjacent property as the City Water Works and Electric Light Plant (power plant).
Additionally, the PESA report identified the following particular areas of interest on the
subject site:

 The observed areas of oil staining around the machines on the first floor of the
main mill building (Building 3) and in the basement of the main mill building;
 The historical storage and use of coal at the southwest portion of the main mill building;
 The engine room, boiler room and machine shop located at the southwest portion
of the main mill building;
 The waste house formerly located southwest of the main mill building; and
 The oil house located south of the main mill building.

Based on review of historical Sanborn maps, the northeast adjacent property operated as a coal and wood storage yard from as early as 1914 until at least 1930. The Sanborn maps show that the site contained a large coal heap which was located approximately 40
feet from the subject site. Additionally, the former coal company was located
topographically upgradient of the subject site.
The west adjacent property was identified as the former City Light and Water Department on historical Sanborn maps and city directories. The site was also identified on the LUST
database for a petroleum release which occurred in 1990. Based on review of
Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 2
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

environmental documents provided by the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ) Washington Regional Office UST Section and summarized in the PESA
report, the results of the assessment activities performed on the west adjacent property
indicate that soil and groundwater contamination associated with the UST release is no
longer present at levels above regulatory standards. Additionally, Mid-Atlantic reviewed the Hydrogeological Site Assessment report performed by OMNI and dated June 1990.
The report provided a brief history of the former operations of the power plant at the
subject site. Information from the report indicates that the west adjacent property was
formally a coal powered steam electric generating station and that No.2 fuel oil was stored
in five ASTs at the site for standby fuel. The report indicates that the power plant was decommissioned around 1975 and several structures remained onsite. The report also
indicates that after the plant shut down the five fuel oil ASTs were used to store diesel
fuel for a local school bus fleet. The ASTs were reportedly removed by the city in 1982.
The two gasoline USTs remained in use for City of Kinston vehicles at the site until 1990.
At the time of the report (June 1990) the site was operating as an electrical substation in addition to the two deep groundwater supply wells. In the PESA, Mid-Atlantic concluded
that the long-term industrial use of this site had the potential to adversely-impact the
subject site.

While completing the PESA Mid-Atlantic reviewed historical Sanborn® Fire Insurance Maps. Mid-Atlantic identified an area of the Glen Raven Mill, which formerly operated at the subject
site, that contained a waste house nearby the former engine room, boiler room, and machine
shop. During the site visit for the PESA report, Mid-Atlantic observed several drums and/or
barrels labeled used oil, lubing oil, and dye barrels near these areas in Building 3.
Additionally, several barrels in the room located east of the furnaces in Building 3 had deteriorated and were leaking onto the concrete floor. The condition of these drums was
determined to be a safety hazard. According to information from the Hazardous Substance
Research Group’s (HSRG) Environmental Update #24 Environmental Hazards of the Textile
Industry, solvents including trichloroethylene (TCE) were used during the dyeing and
finishing procedures, in addition to general usage for cleaning machinery (HSRG, 2006). The current physical conditions in addition to historic operations at the subject site were
identified as potential sources of petroleum and/or solvent contamination.

The April 2016 SSQAPP was developed, and this site assessment was completed, to
determine if the RECs identified in the December 2015 PESA had adversely impacted the subject site. The principal objective of this assessment was to provide analytical data to
document site-wide soil and groundwater quality from historical uses of the site and
adjoining properties and to determine if vapor intrusion will hinder potential future
redevelopment activities. Note that although the future use of the site is currently under
evaluation, we anticipate that as much of the current structures as possible will be reused. Currently, large scaled building demolition is not anticipated. Building foundations and floor
slabs will remain primarily unaltered.
Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 3
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

1.1 Laboratories

Prism Laboratories, Inc. (Soil and Groundwater Sampling)
Post Office Box 240543
Charlotte, North Carolina 28224 [phone]
N.C. Certification No. 402
Contact: Ms. Angela Overcash

H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc. (Sub-Slab Soil Gas Sampling) 2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, California 92010
[phone]
Contact: Ms. Kim Boyd
1.2 Driller

Quantex, Inc.
Post Office Box 41673
Raleigh, NC 27629
[phone] Contact: Mr. J.D. Barker
1.3 Waste Disposal Contractor

A&D Environmental
Post Office Box 963 Burlington, NC 27216
[phone]
Contact: Kevin Young
1.4 Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Survey Contractor
Matrix Health & Safety Consultants, LLC
2900 Yonkers Road
Raleigh, NC 27604
[phone]
Contact: C. Britt Wester

Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 4
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

2.0 SUMMARY OF FIELD ACTIVITIES
Before fieldwork was initiated, Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and traditional
electromagnetic (EM) locating methods were used by GEL Geophysics, Inc. to determine
if underground utilities would be impacted by the planned locations of the monitoring wells
and soil borings. The field assessment activities were conducted in two phases. During the first phase, six permanent monitoring wells were installed and six soil borings were drilled
at the site. Additionally, profiles of the drums located near the former engine room in
Building 3 were created. During the second phase, six sub-slab soil gas samples were
collected from Buildings 1 and 3; the drums were removed from the site; and an asbestos-
containing materials (ACM) and lead-based paint survey was conducted for all structures at the site. Further details of these activities are provided below.
2.1 Soil Sampling Activities

On August 3, 2016, Mid-Atlantic mobilized to the site to oversee the advancement of six
soil borings (SB-1 to SB-6) and installation of six permanent groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1 to MW-6). Soil boring and permanent monitoring well installation services (Section
2.2) were provided by Quantex, Inc. (Quantex) of Clayton, North Carolina.

Soil Boring Locations
The soil boring sampling locations were placed in the vicinity of the former waste house
and former coal pile near the southwest corner of the subject site to assess soil quality at
area of concern “A” (AOC-A) as specified in the April 25, 2016 SSQAPP and shown on
Drawings 1.2 and 2.1. Additionally, soil samples for textural classification were obtained
from monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-6, as described in more detail in Section 2.2.
Soil Sampling and Screening Procedure

Using a GeoProbe “macrocore” sampling device and direct push technology (DPT) at each
boring location (SB-1 through SB-6), the borings were advanced to a depth of five feet BLS in order to collect a soil sample for laboratory testing. Evidence of contamination was not
observed in the borings for sample locations SB-1 through SB-6. Soil recovery in the
macrocores was poor due to the lithology of the soils, which consisted of primarily of pieces
of debris including bricks, asphalt, and concrete. Based on field observations, soil samples
were collected at the default sampling depth of approximately 2 feet BLS as defined in the April 25, 2016 SSQAPP.

A total of seven soil samples were collected from the subject site for laboratory analysis,
including six grab primary samples (primary samples) and one grab duplicate sample. New
nitrile gloves were worn during the collection of each sample, and samples selected for
Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 5
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

laboratory submittal were placed into laboratory-supplied bottles. Samples were then
packed into an ice-filled cooler and shipped under chain-of-custody to Prism Laboratories,
Inc. (Prism) in Charlotte, North Carolina. The tests completed were in accordance with the
SSQAPP including volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260, semi-volatile
organic compounds (semi-VOCs) by EPA Method 8270, and the 8-RCRA Metals (Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium, Chromium, Mercury, Selenium, and Silver) by EPA Method 6010 and
lead by EPA Method 7471.

One grab duplicate soil sample (Duplicate) was collected from soil sample location SB-5.
The sample was collected by splitting recovered soil into jars planned for the primary sample and duplicate sample. Further information is presented in Section 4.2.1.
2.2 Groundwater Sampling Activities

On August 3 and 4, 2016, Quantex, under Mid-Atlantic’s supervision, constructed six
permanent monitoring wells on the subject property (MW-1 to MW-6). Monitoring well locations were placed to assess groundwater quality at the following areas of concern
(AOC) as specified in the April 25, 2016 SSQAPP and shown on Drawings 1.2 and 2.1.
Soil samples for textural classification were obtained from the six permanent monitoring
wells installed on the subject site from areas of concern “A” through “F” as noted below.

 Monitoring well MW-1 was installed at area of concern “A” (AOC-A), to evaluate
potential groundwater contamination associated with historical uses of Building 1
in addition to potential impacts resulting from the documented release and
historical use of the west adjacent property;
 Monitoring well MW-2 and soil borings SB-1 through SB-6 were installed to
address potential soil and groundwater impacts resulting from on-site operational
and historical uses of the site including the location of the former waste house and
former coal pile (AOC-A) and the former oil house (AOC-B). These sample locations are also located near the former engine room, boiler room, and machine
shop;
 Monitoring well MW-3 was installed to address potential contamination from
historical uses of the subject site and adjoining properties (AOC-F);
 Monitoring well MW-4 was installed to address potential contamination from on-
site operational and historical uses of the site immediately downgradient of
Building 3 (AOC-D);
 Monitoring well MW-5 was installed to address potential contamination resulting from on-site operational and potential contamination from historical use of the
adjacent property as a coal yard (AOC-E); and
 Monitoring well MW-6 was installed to address potential contamination resulting from on-site operational and historical uses of Building 3 (AOC-F).

Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 6
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

The permanent monitoring wells were constructed using two-inch diameter Schedule 40
PVC casing and slotted well screen installed in a borehole approximately eight inches in
diameter. The intake interval for the well (i.e. slotted well screen) was installed such that
the well screen bracketed the water table at the time of construction. Well construction
details for the permanent monitoring wells are documented on the well construction schematics included in Appendix A. Boring Logs (Appendix A) note the classification of
soils encountered during installation of the site monitoring wells. In general, the lithology at
the site consisted of compacted silty clays underlain by a fine to medium sand.

The monitoring wells were developed immediately after installation to remove turbid water and improve the efficiency of water passing through the sand installed next to the well
screen. Mid-Atlantic used the low flow method to develop the wells.

After installation and development of the monitoring wells, groundwater sampling was
completed using the low flow method and water quality measurements were obtained on three minute intervals during purging. Measurements were collected for pH, specific
conductance, temperature and turbidity. The field data sheet from groundwater sampling is
included as Appendix B. The groundwater samples from MW-1 and MW-6 were slightly
turbid with the last readings ranging from 12.4 to 13.9 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU).
The samples from MW-2 through MW-5 were moderately turbid with the last readings ranging from 45.5 to 56.5 NTUs. All monitoring wells were purged for an extended period
(20 to 35 minutes) in an effort for the groundwater to become less turbid (less than 10 NTUs).
In general, water for each well showed a general trend of decreasing turbidity during purging.

Mid-Atlantic filled pre-cleaned containers provided by the laboratory for the designated tests. After filling, groundwater samples were placed into an ice-filled cooler and shipped under
chain-of-custody to Prism. Quality assurance/quality control samples (QA/QC) collected
during sampling included one duplicate sample from MW-2 and an equipment rinse blank.
A trip blank was prepared by the laboratory and accompanied shipment of the samples.
Laboratory testing of groundwater samples was completed in accordance with the SSQAPP. The groundwater samples collected from the site monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-6
(including the duplicate sample from MW-2) and the equipment rinse blank were analyzed
by VOCs according to EPA method 8260B and semi-VOCs according to EPA method
8270D. The trip blank was analyzed for VOCs only.
To evaluate groundwater flow direction (Drawing 2.2), Mid-Atlantic surveyed the top of
casing (TOC) elevations and measured depth to groundwater in the monitoring wells on
August 23, 2016. Depth to groundwater ranged from 3.42 to 8.78 feet below TOC on
August 23, 2016 (Table 2.1) and the wells were surveyed relative to the base of the fire
hydrant in front of the main warehouse (Building 3). Based on these data, groundwater flow below the site is generally to the south, towards the Neuse River.
Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 7
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

2.3 Vapor Intrusion Sampling Activities

On August 18, 2016, Mid-Atlantic mobilized to the subject site to collect six sub-slab soil
gas samples (including one duplicate sample) from Buildings 1 and 3 of the subject site.
Each sub-slab sample was collected at least 10 feet from exterior walls and/or obvious underground utilities. To create a sub-slab sampling port, a rotary-impact drill equipped
with a decontaminated spline drill bit was utilized to drill a 5/8-inch diameter hole through
the concrete slab. A vapor sampling probe was established using a new “Vapor Pin™”, a
brass barb fitting with a silicone sleeve that creates a seal with the concrete when inserted
snugly into the hole via an installation/extraction tool. The Vapor Pin was then fitted with small diameter (1/8- or 1/4-inch outer diameter - OD) rigid-wall Teflon tubing to complete
the vapor sampling probe assembly. Sub-slab samples were collected using 1-liter
stainless steel canisters at a maximum flow rate of 200 ml/min.

A leak check was performed at each probe location using a plastic shroud, helium gas and a portable helium gas detector. A plastic shroud was placed over the sub-slab vapor
probe location with the tubing of the probe exiting the shroud through a small hole. A 3-
way valve placed on the probe termination was connected to the sampling apparatus that
was used. Helium was released into the shroud via tubing from the cylinder into the
shroud. A Tedlar bag grab sample was collected from the probe by connecting to the exhaust port of the purge syringe to fill. Helium monitoring indicated that there were no
leaks in the sampling train.

After collection, the sub-slab soil gas canister samples were shipped to H&P Mobile
Geochemistry, Inc. in Carlsbad, California under proper chain of custody for analysis. In accordance with the SSQAPP, the canisters were analyzed using standard laboratory
turnaround times by EPA Method TO-15.

One duplicate soil gas sample was collected immediately following collection of soil gas
sample VP-5. The duplicate sample was collected by closing the sampling train following collection of VP-5, disconnecting the canister from the flow regulator, and reconnecting the
duplicate sample canister to the flow regulator. Further information is presented in Section
4.2.1.
2.3 Drum Removal Activities
On August 4, 2016, A&D Environmental (A&D) mobilized to the subject site to evaluate
and generate profiles of the ten 55-gallon drums located in the basement of Building 3,
east of the boiler room. The approximate location of this area is shown on Drawing 2.1.
The drums appeared to be in poor condition and two of the drums appeared to be leaking.
Based on their field analysis results (Appendix C), one of the leaking drums likely contained flocculent and the other contained a “gelled yellow Resin-like material”. Of the
Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 8
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

remaining eight drums that did not appear to be leaking, one drum was identified by A&D
as containing flocculent and the drum appeared in poor condition and unsuitable for
transport; therefore, A&D recommended that the contents of this drum be transferred to
another drum for transport. Another drum was identified as containing lubricant and the
remaining six drums contained water-based dyes of various colors.
A&D remobilized to the subject site on August 18, 2016 to remove the drums from the
site. To remove the leaking drums, A&D placed the drums inside overpack containers
and used absorbent on the floors to soak up the leaked chemicals and placed the used
absorbent inside the overpack drums. One drum containing flocculent was discolored and appeared to be in poor condition not suitable for transport. A&D transferred the contents
of this drum to a new metal 55-gallon drum for transport and disposal. The remaining
seven drums were direct loaded on to their truck for transport and disposal. Copies of
A&D’s field analysis report, drum profiles, and Bill’s of Lading (manifests) are attached in Appendix C.
2.4 Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Survey Activities

Mid-Atlantic contracted with Matrix Health and Safety Consultants, LLC (Matrix) to
complete asbestos-containing material (ACM) and lead-based paint surveys. Matrix
conducted their survey on August 18, 2016 for all structures on the subject site (Buildings 1, 2, and 3). The ACM and lead-based paint findings report is included as Appendix D
and summarized in Section 3.0.

3.0 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
The laboratory analytical reports and chain-of-custody records for the soil, groundwater, and
sub-slab soil gas samples collected at the site are provided in Appendix E. The ACM and
lead-based paint survey report conducted by Matrix is provided in Appendix D. The
laboratory results for constituents detected in the soil, groundwater, and sub-slab soil gas samples are summarized in Tables 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3, respectively.

Soil Sample Results

As documented in Table 3.1, with the exception of metals, only soil sample SB-5 exhibited constituents at concentrations above the Inactive Hazardous Site Branch’s (IHSB)
protection of groundwater Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs). Three constituents
were detected in SB-5 above their protection of groundwater PSRGs including methylene
chloride, 1-methylnaphthalene, and 2-methylnapthalene. Note that several VOCs and
SVOCs were detected in soil samples SB-1, SB-2, SB-4, and SB-5 (including the duplicate sample of SB-5) at “estimated concentrations” above the laboratory method detection limits
Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 9
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

(MDLs). The estimated concentrations are denoted with a “J” and several of these
constituents with estimated concentrations were detected above their respective residential
and/or protection of groundwater PSRGs. Refer to Section 4.2.1 for further information on
estimated values.
Additionally, as summarized in Table 3.1, arsenic and selenium were detected at
concentrations above PSRGs. Arsenic was detected in all six soil samples (including the
duplicate sample of SB-5) at concentrations exceeding its residential, industrial/commercial,
and protection of groundwater PSRG. Selenium was detected in the duplicate soil sample
of SB-5 at a concentration of 2.2 mg/kg, which is above its protection of groundwater PSRG. Note that selenium was detected in primary soil sample SB-5 at 2.0 mg/kg, below the
protection of groundwater PSRG of 2.1 mg/kg.

Summary: Soil is contaminated at the site in the area of the former waste house and coal
pile with methylene chloride, 1-methylnapthalene, and 2-methylnaphthalene. Concentrations of these three compounds were detected in soil sample SB-5 above
protection of groundwater PSRGs.

Metals were detected in soil samples from this area above PSRGs including arsenic and
selenium. Arsenic is frequently detected in North Carolina soils at concentrations exceeding 3 mg/Kg, the industrial/commercial PSRG. The North Carolina Department of Agriculture
and Consumer Services (NCDA) reported an average concentration of 4.5 mg/Kg for
arsenic based on laboratory testing of 3,286 soil samples from across the State between
2005 and 2007 (NCDA, 2008). The EPA notes that arsenic typically ranges from 4 to 9
mg/Kg in most soils (EPA, 2003).
After comparing the detected compounds with their published PSRGs, Mid-Atlantic
performed risk calculations as follows. The IHSB establishes PSRGs for individual
compounds for residential and non-residential (industrial/commercial) exposure scenarios.
The IHSB and the North Carolina Brownfields Program allow a maximum cancer risk sum for all carcinogens of 1.0E-04 and a maximum cumulative hazard index (HI) of 1.0 for all
non-carcinogens in soils. Samples above these values are required to be cleaned up to
IHSB guidelines and/or using land use restrictions (IHSB, 2015). The HI is the sum of the
hazard quotient (HQs) calculated for each compound detected above the reporting limit. As
summarized in Table 3.1, the residential cancer risk sum for all soil samples ranged from 6.3E-06 to 3.5E-05, which is below the target cancer risk sum of 1.0E-04. The residential
cumulative non-cancer hazard index for all soil samples ranged from 0.13 to 0.72, which is
below the target cumulative non-cancer hazard index of 1.0.

Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 10
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

Groundwater Sample Results

The groundwater sample laboratory results were compared to the NCGQS in order to
evaluate the site for potential groundwater contamination (Table 3.2). Several VOC
constituents were detected above their laboratory MDLs at concentrations below their respective NCGQS. VOCs, including chloroform, methyl isobutyl ketone, and toluene were
detected in samples MW-4 and MW-6 at concentrations below their respective NCGQS.
Note that only one constituent (total xylenes) was detected in samples MW-2 (and its
Duplicate sample), MW-3, and MW-5 at an estimated concentration above the laboratory
MDL and that no constituents were detected above the laboratory MDLs in sample MW-1. SVOCs were not detected above their laboratory MDLs in groundwater samples collected
from the site.

Sub-Slab Soil Gas Sample Results
The sub-slab soil gas sample laboratory results were compared to the Division of Waste
Management (DWM) Residential and Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion Sub-Slab and
Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (March 2016 Table), as shown on Table 3.3. Several
constituents were detected above the laboratory MDL in each of the soil gas samples
collected from the site (VP-1 through VP-6). The detected constituents primarily include petroleum and solvent related compounds. As indicated, target compounds were not
detected in soil gas samples at concentrations exceeding the DWM Residential or Non-
Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels.
Several solvents, including tetrachloroethylene and trichloroethylene were detected in soil
gas collected from the site; however, these concentrations were below DWM Residential
and Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels. Tetrachloroethylene was detected
in sub-slab soil gas at the site at concentrations ranging from 2.9 to 7.2 µg/m³, below the DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Level of 278 µg/m³. Additionally, trichloroethylene was detected in three soil gas samples at the site at concentrations ranging
from 4.2 to 12 µg/m³, below the DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Level of 13.9
µg/m³.
Asbestos Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Survey Results
As noted in Section 2.4, Mid-Atlantic contracted with Matrix to complete a ACM and lead-
based paints survey at the subject site. Matrix did not identify ACM or lead-based paints in
Building 1; however, Matrix did identify ACM and lead-based paint in Buildings 2 and 3 of
the subject site. A material is considered by the EPA to be asbestos-containing if asbestos is present in a quantity greater than one percent. Asbestos was detected in samples of vinyl
sheet flooring, exterior door caulk, roofing materials, stoop mastic, and exterior window
glazing collected from Building 2 and in samples of exterior door caulk, vinyl sheeting,
Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 11
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

mastic, thermal system insulation, window glazing, and roof flashing collected from Building
3. Lead-based paint was identified on the exterior portions of Building 2 and sampled
materials exhibited lead contents greater than 9.9 mg/cm² (for the purpose of this survey,
paints with concentrations of 1.0 mg/cm² or greater were considered lead-based paint).
Additionally, lead-based paint was identified at several locations in Building 3 based on samples collected from painted wood, bricks, and metals, which exhibited concentrations
between 1.0 and greater than 9.9 mg/cm². Refer to Tables 3.4 and 3.5 and Appendix D for
further information.
4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE

The QAPP and the SSQAPP set forth the procedures and methods for data collection, and
defined the specific procedures and adjustments necessary to maintain data quality to
support the project decision. The Limited Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) required both field and laboratory checks to monitor conformance to project quality limits.
4.1 Property-Specific Corrective Actions

The investigation field methods were reviewed during the data verification audit discussed
in the next paragraph. The field methods used were consistent with the EPAs guidelines included in Appendices D and E of the QAPP (note that the SSQAPP referenced the QAPP
for field procedures) with the following exceptions:

 The turbidity values from purging the permanent monitoring wells exceeded 10 NTU. The wells were purged for time periods ranging from 20 to 35 minutes in an attempt
to lower turbidity values. Two monitoring wells yielded water of slight turbidity (12.4
to 13.9 NTU) and the remaining four monitoring wells yielded water of moderate
turbidity (45.5 to 56.5 NTU).
Data verification and data validation audits were completed by Mid-Atlantic before this report
was prepared. In addition to the turbidity values noted above, the following deficiencies were
discovered that were related to the field drilling/sampling and laboratory testing program:

 The planned sample locations for sub-slab soil gas points VP-3, VP-4, and VP-5 were
changed based on field observations that revealed a large crawlspace (that ranged
in height from approximately two feet to approximately five feet). In accordance with
the SSQAPP, movement of the sample locations was discussed and approved by
the Project Manager;
 The groundwater trip blank was not analyzed for semi-VOCs in accordance with the
SSQAPP due to an error in communication with the laboratory, who only supplied a
trip blank suitable for testing of VOCs only;
Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 12
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

 The ACM and lead-based paints survey contractor used a laboratory that’s not listed
in the QAPP for asbestos testing of samples collected at the site; and
 The minimum detection limits for several VOCs for soil, groundwater, and sub-slab soil gas; and for several semi-VOCs for soil and groundwater were above the most
stringent action levels and/or screening levels applicable to the site, as discussed
further below.
4.2 Quality Control Parameters
To assess whether quality assurance objectives for this project have been achieved, the
following QC parameters were considered: precision, accuracy, representativeness,
comparability, completeness and sensitivity.
4.2.1 Precision and Accuracy

As described in the QAPP, precision is evaluated using the relative percent difference (RPD)
between an actual sample and a duplicate sample. In accordance with the SSQAPP, one
duplicate soil sample, one duplicate groundwater sample, one duplicate sub-slab soil gas
sample, one equipment rinse blank sample and one trip blank sample were collected during the limited ESA activities. A comparison of the detected concentrations for the primary
samples and their associated duplicate samples was made to evaluate the reproducibility of
the sample results based on the laboratory analysis and sample collection and
transportation procedures. The variability of the results for the primary and duplicates
samples were evaluated by calculating the RPD and percent ratio for each analyte among the duplicate pairs using the formula below

RPD = [(xl-x2)/x]100% Where:
xl = concentration of sample 1 of pair,
x2 = concentration of sample 2 of pair, and
x = average of sample 1 and sample 2.
Percent Ratio = (x1/x2) 100%.

RPD percentages <35% indicate “good/acceptable” variability, a %RPD >35% but < 50%
indicated that the variability was “slightly high”, and a %RPD >50% indicated a “high” degree
of variability.

Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 13
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

Soils

The results of the comparisons for the one duplicate soil sample pair from the August
2016 field work is listed in Table 4.1. As indicated, for VOC compounds analyzed by
EPA Method 8260, precision was determined to be “good/acceptable” for each compound detected in both samples with the exception of naphthalene (by EPA
Method 8260), which was determined to be “slightly high”. For SVOC compounds
analyzed by EPA Method 8270, precision was determined to be “slightly high” to
“high” for each compound detected in both samples.
Groundwater

The results of the comparisons for the one duplicate groundwater sample pair from
the August 2016 field work is listed in Table 4.2. As indicated, only one compound
was detected in each sample and precision was determined to be “good/acceptable” for the compound (m,p-xylenes).

Sub-Slab Soil Gas

The results of the comparisons for the one duplicate sub-slab soil gas sample pair from the August 2016 field work is listed in Table 4.3. As indicated, precision was
determined to be “good/acceptable” for each compound detected in both samples.
Note that two compounds, carbon disulfide and trichloroethene, were detected in the
duplicate soil gas sample and not in the primary sample.
Accuracy is evaluated using a percent recovery measured in spiked and unspiked samples.
Accuracy is a function of the laboratory method, and parameters regarding accuracy are
included in the lab report provided by the laboratory.
4.2.2 Representativeness
Mid-Atlantic has evaluated the representativeness of the limited ESA activities to document
the degree to which the sample data accurately and precisely represents a characteristic of
a population, parameter variations at a sampling point, or an environmental condition.
Review of field methods and procedures indicated that sample collection, handling and
transportation were conducted in general accordance with the QAPP and SSQAPP. Review of analytical results indicates that the analytical data is generally uniform and consistent
between sampling points.

Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 14
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

4.2.3 Completeness

Soil: A total of seven1 soil samples were collected for analysis of the following tests: VOCs
(7 samples), semi-VOCs (7 samples), and 8-RCRA Metals (7 samples). For the laboratory
analyses, the SSQAPP specified analyses of seven samples for VOCs, semi-VOCs, and 8-RCRA Metals (including testing of 1 duplicate soil sample). Completeness for VOC testing
was 100%, semi-VOC testing was 100%, and 8-RCRA Metals testing was 100%.

Groundwater: A total of nine2 water samples were collected for analysis of the following
tests: VOCs (9 samples) and semi-VOCs (8 samples). For the laboratory analyses, the SSQAPP specified analyses of nine samples for VOCs (including testing of 1 duplicate
groundwater sample, 1 trip blank, and 1 equipment rinse blank) and nine samples for semi-
VOCs (including 1 duplicate sample, 1 trip blank, and 1 equipment rinse blank). The
laboratory only supplied a trip blank for VOCs and not for semi-VOCs and therefore the trip
blank was not analyzed for semi-VOCs. Completeness for VOC testing was 100% and for semi-VOC testing was 88.9%.

Sub-Slab Soil Gas: A total of seven3 sub-slab soil gas samples were collected for analysis
of the following tests: VOCs (7 samples). For the laboratory analyses, the SSQAPP
specified analyses of seven samples for VOCs (including testing of 1 duplicate sub-slab soil gas sample). Completeness for VOC testing was 100%.
4.2.4 Comparability

To produce comparable data, the units specified for analytical results obtained during the
field activities are consistent throughout this project. The soil tables (Tables 3.1 and 4.1) have units of milligrams per kilogram (mg/Kg), groundwater tables (Tables 3.2 and 4.2) have
units of micrograms per Liter (µg/L), and sub-slab soil gas tables (Tables 3.3 and 4.3) have
units of micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m³). The soil, water, and soil gas units used in the
report tables are similar to the units included in the State and EPA action levels and/or screening levels that are used for comparison.
4.2.5 Sensitivity

Laboratory quantitation limits (reporting limit and/or MDL) for soils, groundwater, and soil gas were sufficient to report concentrations below the most stringent action levels and/or screening levels (residential and/or protection of groundwater PSRGs for soils; 2L North
Carolina Groundwater Standards for groundwater; and DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion

1 Including one duplicate soil sample from boring SB-5.
2 Including one duplicate groundwater sample from well MW-2, an equipment rinse blank, and a trip blank.
3 Including one duplicate sub-slab soil gas sample from VI-5.
Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 15
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

Screening Levels for soil gas) in undiluted samples with the exception of the following:

Soils: EPA Method 8260 - 1,2-dibromoethane and 1,2,3-trichloropropane
EPA Method 8270 - 1,4-dichlorobenzene, phenol, bix(2-
chloroethyl)ether, hexachlorobenzene, 2,4-dichlorophenol, 2,4-dinitrotoluene, indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, benzo(b)fluoranthene,
benzo(a)pyrene, dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, benzo(a)anthracene, 2,6-
dinitrotoluene, N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine,
hexachlorocyclopentadiene, isophorone, hexachlorobutadiene,
pentachlorophenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol, 1-methylnaphthalene, naphthalene, and 1,2-dichlorobenzene

Groundwater: EPA Method 8260 - 1,2-dibromoethane, vinyl chloride, 1,2-dibromo-3-
chloropropane, 1,2,3-trichloropropane
EPA Method 8270 - bis(2-chloroethyl)ether, hexachlorobenzene, indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene,
benzo(a)pyrene, dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, benzo(a)anthracene, N-
nitrodiphenylamine, hexachlorobutadiene, pentachlorophenol, and 2-
chlorophenol
Soil Gas: EPA Method TO-15 - 1,1,2-trichloroethane, 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB),
and hexachlorobutadiene

The above listed analytes have very low action levels. North Carolina regulations do not
consider a compound above the NCGQS unless it is detected above the laboratory reporting limit, which is set at a higher level than the MDL. Refer to Section 4.3 for additional
information.
4.3 Laboratory Data Evaluation

The laboratory completed validation and verification of laboratory processes and data, and delivered a laboratory report to the Mid-Atlantic Project Manager. The laboratory report and
the QC information contained therein documents compliance to the QAPP.

The following qualifiers were used by the contract laboratory in this report when presenting
data for the limited ESA samples and QA/QC samples collected by Mid-Atlantic :
“A” – Average response is below established range. CCV response is within
range.
“Aa” – Probable lab contaminant.
“Ab” – Response factor is outside established range. CCV result is above range. Analyte not detected in sample.
Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 16
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

“CCV” – CCV result is above the control limits. Analyte not detected in the
sample. No further action taken.
“D” – RPD value outside of the control limits.
“ISB” – Both 5035 VOA samples resulted in low internal standard recovery.
Analysis repeated using bulk sample container. “J” – Detected but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result is an estimated
concentration (CLP J-Flag).
“L” – Parameter reported with possible low bias. LCS recovery below the QC
limit.
“LH” – High LCS recovery. Analyte not detected in the sample(s). No further action taken.
“MC” – Sample concentration too high for recovery evaluation.
“RL” – Increased RL because of the sample matrix.
“SR” – Surrogate recovery outside the QC limits.
“P” – Recovery outside of the QC limits due to inconsistency during extraction and chromatographic performance of this compound.
“BRL” – Below Reporting Limit.
“MDL” – Method Detection Limit.
“RPD” – Relative Percent Difference.
“QL-1H” – The LCS and/or LCSD recoveries fell above the established control specifications for this analyte. Any result for this compound is qualified and
should be considered biased high.
“LCC” – Leak Check Compound.
“ND” – Analyte Not Detected at or above the reporting limit.
“%REC” – Relative Percent Difference.
Data usability determination is also a part of data evaluation. After data validity has been
assessed, that is, the analytical data has been reviewed and qualifier codes have been
applied, these data were individually identified and assessed for usability. Sample data (both
with and without qualifier codes) may be generally spoken of as either qualitative (Level A), quantitative (Level B), or unusable. Typically, certain samples with a specific matrix may
have parameters that require qualifier codes. A discussion of these qualifier codes for each
level is provided below.
4.3.1 Qualitative Data – Level A
Qualitative data are often referred to as Level A data. All screening data is considered Level
A data. Screening data may not be considered as Level B data, and cannot be used to make
site management decisions. Data in this level also include “J” coded data. These data are
considered to be an estimated quantity, i.e., a presence or absence value. Data having been
given a “J” code were not automatically classified as qualitative data only; these data were considered as Level B (quantitative) data depending on bias, and were evaluated on a case
Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 17
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

by case basis. Data reported with a “BRL” code can also be classified as Level B data
provided the detection limit was not above an applicable regulatory action level for that
analyte. All field-screening and field-instrument-derived data was accepted as Level A.
These data were not considered for inclusion as Level B data and will not be used to make
site decisions. All analytical data received as part of the analytical package for this site were accepted as Level A data.
4.3.2 Quantitative Data – Level B

Data at this level are referred to as Level B data. Only data meeting all field and analytical
data usability requirements may be classified as Level B data. This means all quality assurance parameters have been satisfied, including quality control and quality
assessment. Only data that were found to be analytically valid and passed all criteria for
Level A were considered for classification at Level B. These data are considered definitive
and may be used for any purpose.
In reviewing the laboratory report, the soil and groundwater samples had several analytes
reported as detections with “J” data qualifiers, indicating the reported value is an estimate
reported within the 95% confidence interval. These compounds (“J value”) were detected
above the MDL, but below the reporting limit or “RL”. The MDL is the lowest concentration
at which an analyte can be detected in a sample by the particular laboratory method used. “Detected” indicates that the analyte can be distinguished from the blank with reasonable
certainty. The reporting limit (also called practical quantitation limit, or PQL) is approximately
five times the MDL or the lower calibration standard, whichever is higher. Results above
the reporting limit can be distinguished from the blank and fall within applicable standard
curves. For the purposes of this assessment, “J value” qualified data are considered acceptable for making site management decisions as these data are not the sole
determinant of “clean.” These data are accepted as Level B data.

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The principal objective of this assessment was to provide analytical data to document
site-wide soil and groundwater quality from historical uses of the site and adjoining
properties and to determine if vapor intrusion may hinder potential future redevelopment
activities. Mid-Atlantic offers the following conclusions based on the results of this assessment as they pertain to redevelopment:

 In the area of the former coal pile and waste house located near the southwest
portion of the subject site, one VOC (methylene chloride) and two semi-VOCs (1-methylnaphtalene and 2-methylnaphtalene) were detected in soil at
concentrations that exceed the protection of groundwater PSRG established by
Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 18
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

the DWM. Additional VOC and SVOC concentrations were flagged by the
laboratory as “estimated” because the analytes were detected at concentrations
below the laboratory reporting limit;
 Soil samples from the area of the former coal pile and waste house exhibited metals exceeding DWM PSRGs. Arsenic was detected in all soil samples collected
from the site at concentrations exceeding the residential, industrial/commercial,
and/or protection of groundwater PSRGs. Selenium was detected in the duplicate
sample of SB-5 at a concentration above the protection of groundwater PSRG
(note that selenium was detected in sample SB-5 at a concentration of 2.0 mg/Kg, which is below the 2.1 mg/Kg protection of groundwater PSRG for selenium);
 Soil samples collected from the site exhibited residential cancer risk sums below
the target cancer risk sum of 1.0E-04 and/or residential cumulative non-cancer
hazard indexes below the target cumulative non-cancer hazard index of 1.0;
 Groundwater collected at the subject site did not exhibit constituents above their
respective NCGQS;
 Based on groundwater table elevations calculated for the site, groundwater flow below the site is generally to the south, towards the Neuse River;
 Sub-slab soil gas samples collected from Building 1 and 3 of the subject site did
not exhibit constituents above the DWM Residential or Non-Residential Vapor
Intrusion Screening Levels;
 Several solvents, including tetrachloroethylene and trichloroethylene were
detected in soil gas collected from the site; however, these concentrations were
below DWM Residential and Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels;
 A total of ten 55-gallon drums were removed from the site, including two drums
that were leaking. Profiles created for these drums before transport off-site
revealed that the drums contained lubricants, flocculants, and water-based dyes;
and
 The ACM and lead-based paint survey conducted for all structures at the subject site document the presence of ACM and lead-based paint in Buildings 2 and 3 of
the subject site.

Based on the data collected to date, contaminants of concern (CoCs) are present at the subject site. The detectable VOCs in soil are present at concentrations below their established residential PSRGs while arsenic and selenium are present at concentrations
above their industrial/commercial and protection of groundwater PSRGs, respectively.
However, risk calculations of soil samples exhibit sample residential cancer risk sums
below the target cancer risk sum of 1.0E-04 and target cumulative non-cancer hazard index of 1.0. Although low levels of CoCs were detected in the groundwater samples collected at the site (most were estimated concentrations), concentrations were below
their respective NCGQS. Additionally, sub-slab soil gas data collected from the site
indicates the presence of CoCs; however, the concentrations of these CoCs are present
at levels below DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels. Therefore, current
Limited Environmental Site Assessment Report October 21, 2016
Former Glen Raven Mill Page 19
800 Manning Street
Kinston, North Carolina

data does not suggest that a vapor intrusion condition exists at the site. Based on the
data collected during this investigation, the level of CoCs in soil, groundwater, and sub-
slab soil gas should not pose a health risk to current or future occupants or an impediment
to future redevelopment of the site. The ACM and lead-based paint identified in Buildings
2 and 3 need to be taken into consideration and addressed appropriately during potential redevelopment of the site.

6.0 REFERENCES
[Listed Chronologically]

EPA, 2003, Proceedings and Summary Report, U.S. EPA Workshop on Managing
Arsenic Risks the Environment: Characterization of Waste, Chemistry and Treatment and
Disposal, May 1-3, 2001, Denver, Colorado, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, Ohio, October 2003, page 34.

NCDA, 2008, Heavy Metals in North Carolina Soils, Occurrence and Significance, David
H. Hardy, Jeana Myers and Catherine Stokes, Agronomic Division, North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Raleigh, North Carolina, revised
September 2008.

Mid-Atlantic, 2015, Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan, Brownfield Assessment and
Cleanup, Kinston, North Carolina, Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina, April 22, 2015.

IHSB, 2015, North Carolina Inactive Hazardous Sites Program Guidelines for
Assessment and Cleanup, Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Waste
Management, Superfund Section, Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch, October 2015
North Carolina Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch Soil Remediation Goals, Division of
Waste Management, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, April 2016
Mid-Atlantic, 2016, Site-Specific Quality Assurance Project Plan, Limited Site
Assessment Addendum 3-A, Former Glen Raven Mill, 800 Manning Street, Kinston,
Lenoir County, North Carolina, Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina,
April 25, 2016.

DRAWINGS
´
DRAWN BY:
DATE:
ENG.
CHECK:
JOB NO:
APPROVAL:
DRAFTCHECK:
GIS NO:
DWG NO:
REFERENCES:SCALE:
LENOIR
JONES
PITT
CRAVEN
DUPLIN
WAYNE
GREENE
AREA SHOWNWITHIN LENOIR COUNTY
OCTOBER 2016
000R2611.00 T4055
03G-R2611.00-4055-1
1.1
1. KINSTON, NC DIGITAL RASTER GRAPHIC, USGS. SCANNED FROM 1:12,000-SCALE KINSTON, NC TOPOGRAPHIC MAP, PUBLISHED 2013, USGS.2. INSET MAP DIGITAL DATA FROM 2002 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION ATLAS, BUREAU OF TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS, WASHINGTON, D.C.
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 5 FEET
0 1,000 2,000Feet
1:12,000
SITE
TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP
FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL800 MANNING STREET
KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA
!R
!R
!R
!R!R
!R !A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
X Y
X Y
X Y X Y
X Y
X Y
´
AREAS OF CONCERN AND SOIL BORING, SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS,
AND MONITORING WELL LOCATION MAP
FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL
800 MANNING STREET
KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWN BY:
DRAFT CHECK BY:
ENGINEER CHECK BY:
APPROVED BY:
DATE: OCTOBER 2016
JOB NO.: 000R2611.00 T4055
GIS NO.: 3G-R2611.00 T4055-3
DRAWING NO.: 2.1
REFERENCES: APRIL 2012 ORTHOPHOTOGRAPH PROVIDED BY NC ONEMAP. MID-ATLANTIC FIELD NOTES. PARCEL AND ROAD GIS DATA PROVIDED BY LENOIR CO. GIS.
0 125 250 375 50062.5 Feet
Legend
SUBJECT SITE
PROPERTY LINES
AREA OF CONCERN
!R SOIL BORING LOCATION
!A GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
X Y SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
VP-1
VP-2
VP-3
VP-4
VP-5
VP-6
MW-1
MW-3
MW-5
MW-4
MW-6
MW-2
SB-3
SB-4
SB-5 / DUPLICATE
SB-6
SB-1
SB-2
TA
TA
TB
TC
TF
TD
TE
ATLANTIC AVENUE/N
C
R
R
MANNING STREET
R
H
E
M

S
T
R
E
E
T
H
O
O
D

S
T
R
E
E
T
Approximate Location
of 55-gallon Drums
Building 1
Building 2
Building 3
MW-5
VP-6
SB-1
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
!A
´
ESTIMATED WATER TABLE CONTOUR MAP
AUGUST 23, 2016
FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL
800 MANNING STREET
KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA
DRAWN BY:
DRAFT CHECK BY:
ENGINEER CHECK BY:
APPROVED BY:
DATE: OCTOBER 2016
JOB NO.: 000R2611.00 T4055
GIS NO.: 3G-R2611.00 T4055-4
DRAWING NO.: 2.2
REFERENCES: APRIL 2012 ORTHOPHOTOGRAPH PROVIDED BY NC ONEMAP. MID-ATLANTIC FIELD NOTES. PARCEL AND ROAD GIS DATA PROVIDED BY LENOIR CO. GIS.
0 125 250 375 50062.5 Feet
Legend
SUBJECT SITE
PROPERTY LINES
!A GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION (AT LOCATION)
ESTIMATED WATER TABLE CONTOUR
$GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
MW-1
MW-3
MW-5
MW-4
MW-6
MW-2
ATLANTIC AVENUE/N
C
R
R
MANNING STREET
R
H
E
M

S
T
R
E
E
T
H
O
O
D

S
T
R
E
E
T
89.5 '
87.0 '
84.5 '
82.0 '
(91.66')
(89.47')
(88.49')
(88.62')
(79.35')
(91.52')
$
8
2
.
0

'
8
4
.
5

'
8
7
.
0

'
89.5

'
$
$
$
$
$
(89.47')
89.5 '
MW-5

TABLES

WELL NUMBER DATE TOC (ft)DTW (ft),
BTOC SWLE (ft)
0
MW-1 8/23/16 98.71 7.19 91.52
MW-2 8/23/16 87.63 8.28 79.35
MW-3 8/23/16 96.41 4.75 91.66
MW-4 8/23/16 92.04 3.42 88.62
MW-5 8/23/16 97.77 8.30 89.47
MW-6 8/23/16 97.27 8.78 88.49
Notes and Abbreviations:
2. Measuring point is top of well (TOC) casing unless otherwise noted.
DTW - Depth-to-Water in feet
SWLE - Static Water Elevation in feet
1. All elevations shown relative to site benchmark (base of fire
hydrant in front of main warehouse) - Assumed datum 100.00 feet.
BTOC - Below Top of Casing (TOC). Top of monitoring well pipe is 2 to 3 inches
below the land surface.
TABLE 2.1
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTSFORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL
800 MANNING STREET
KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA
MID-ATLANTIC JOB NO. 000R2611.00 T4055
SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 SB-5 DUPLICATE
(OF SB-5)SB-6
EPA METHOD 8260B
Acetone --0.039 J .044 J 0.038 J ----0.035 J 12200 100000 24
Methylene Chloride --------0.039 0.027 --57 640 0.023
Naphthalene ------0.52 J 0.0055 J 0.0043 J --3.8 17 0.21
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene --------0.0044 J ----12.6 186 NL
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene --------0.0046 J ----11.6 52 2.2
EPA METHOD 8207D
Acenaphthylene ----------1.6 J --NL NL 21
1-Methylnaphthalene 0.17 J 0.68 J --0.60 J 2.2 3.6 J --18 73 0.055
2-Methylnaphthalene 0.21 J 0.73 J --0.72 J 2.5 4.3 J --48 600 1.6
Benzo(a)pyrene ------1.2 J 0.62 J ----0.016 0.29 0.059
Benzo(a)anthracene ------1.6 J 0.81 J 2.0 J --0.16 2.9 0.18
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ------0.79 J ------NL NL 7,800
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.14 J --1.8 J 0.95 J 2.2 J --0.16 2.9 0.6
Chrysene --0.66 J --1.9 J 1.3 J 3.7 J --16 290 18
Dibenzofuran --------0.82 J ----14.6 200 5.2
Fluoranthene ------2.5 1.2 J 3.5 J --480 6,000 330
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ------0.89 J ------0.16 2.9 2
Phenanthrene 0.39 J 0.91 J --2.1 2.7 6.6 0.62 J NL NL 68
Pyrene --0.54 J --3 1.4 J 4.3 J 0.55 J 360 4,600 220
Naphthalene 0.16 J ------1.7 J 6.1 J --3.8 17 0.21
EPA METHOD 6010D
Arsenic 4.9 7.3 4.3 11 24 20 10 0.68 3 5.8
Barium 130 27 48 87 74 83 240 3,000 44,000 580
Chromium 3.7 3.3 8.4 4.3 3.6 4.0 7.8 24,000*100,000*360,000*
Lead 5.4 4.8 11 29 19 16 15 400 800 270
Selenium 0.96 1.4 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.2 0.83 78 1,160 2.1
EPA METHOD 7471B
Mercury --0.23 J --0.12 0.12 0.14 0.025 2.2 3.13 1
IHSB RESIDENTIAL SCENARIO RISK CALCULATIONS
Sample Cancer Risk Sum 7.2E-06 1.1E-05 6.3E-06 1.6E-05 3.5E-05 2.9E-05 1.5E-05
Sample Cumulative Non-cancer
Hazard Index 0.15 0.21 0.13 0.34 0.72 0.60 0.31
Notes:
Bold values denote that analyte was detected above its IHSB Residential Health Based Preliminary Soil Remediation Goal (PSRG) (April 2016)
Orange shaded values denote that analyte was detected above its IHSB Protection of Groundwater PSRG (April 2016)
Bold and Red shaded values denote that analyte was detected above its IHSB Industrial/Commercial Health Based PSRG (April 2016)
J = Detected above the Method Detection Limit but below the Reporting Limit, therefore, result is an estimated concentration
-- = Analyte not detected above the Method Detection Limit
Cumulative non-cancer hazard index assumes similar critical health effects for all analytes
Compounds detected at estimated concentrations (below the laboratory reporting limit) were not used for risk calculations
* = Chromium (III), Insoluble Salts were used for the PSRGs
NL = Not Listed for Analyte
Target Cumulative Hazard Index for Non-Carcinogens (HI=1)
Target Cancer Risk Sum for Carcinogens (1.0E-04)
TABLE 3.1
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS DETECTED IN SOIL
FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL
800 MANNING STREET
KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA
MID-ATLANTIC JOB NO. R2611.00 T4055
Preliminary Residential
Health Based Soil
Remediation Goal
(mg/Kg)
Preliminary
Industrial/Commercial
Health Based Soil
Remediation Goal
(mg/Kg)
Protection of
Groundwater (PSRG)
(mg/Kg)
SOIL BORING LOCATIONS
CONCENTRATION (mg/Kg)
MW-1 MW-2 Duplicate
(of MW-2)MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 MW-6
Acetone --------19 ----6,000
Chloroform --------4.8 --1.1 70
Diethyl phthalate --------4.2 J ----6,000
Methyl Ethyl Ketone --------0.57 J ----4,000
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone --------7.0 ----NL
Naphthalene --------0.86 J ----6
Toluene --------0.57 ----600
Xylenes, total --0.59 J 0.56 J 0.74 J 0.65 J 0.57 J --500
Notes:
-- = Analyte Not Detected Above the Method Detection Limit
J = Detected above the Method Detection Limit but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result is an estimated concentration
NL = No NCGQS listed for analyte
TABLE 3.2
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS DETECTED IN GROUNDWATER
FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL
800 MANNING STREET
KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA
MID-ATLANTIC JOB NO. R2611.00 T4055
Volatile Organic Compounds - 8260B
Bold values denote that analyte was detected above its 2L North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standard
CHEMICAL CONSTITUENT
CONCENTRATION (µg/L)
NC Groundwater Quality
Standards
VP-1
8/19/2016
VP-2
8/19/2016
VP-3
8/19/2016
VP-4
8/19/2016
VP-5
8/19/2016
DUPLICATE (OF VP-5)
8/19/2016
VP-6
8/19/2016
Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)~~12 8.2 20 64 24 28 64
Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12)695 8,760 ----4.0 ------18
Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)4,170 52,600 ----2.0 QL-1H 8.3 QL-1H ------
Carbon disulfide 4,870 61,300 ----3.0 ----2.3 3.9
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ~~------3.3 ------
2-Butanone (MEK)34,800 438,000 6.2 7.2 9.0 43 8.2 7.4 5.7
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ~~------3.4 --1.8 --
Chloroform 40.7 533 --------1.7 1.7 --
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 34,800 438,000 ----15 3.4 ------
Benzene 120 1,570 1.0 2.0 4.7 1.4 2.3 1.8 2.5
Trichloroethene 13.9 175 --4.2 --6.5 --12 --
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)20,900 263,000 --4.5 3.8 4.2 ------
Toluene 34,800 438,000 7.0 13 20 3.6 5.2 4.2 13
Tetrachloroethene 278 3,500 --2.9 3.9 7.2 5.0 5.2 --
Ethylbenzene 374 4,910 --2.4 4.0 2.5 ----2.9
m,p-Xylene 695 8,760 5.1 8.7 14 5.0 3.1 2.5 11
Styrene 6,950 87,600 --5.3 12 ------6.3
o-Xylene 695 8,760 --4.1 5.5 ------3.8
Chloromethane 626 7,880 ----3.2 1.8 ------
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 48.7 613 2.0 3.3 5.5 ------4.4
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 85.1 1,110 --3.5 3.2 ------3.2
NOTES:
-- = Analyte Not Detected Above the Method Detection Limit
QL-1H = The LCS and/or LCSD recoveries fell above the established control specifications for this analyte. Any result for this compound is qualified and should be considered biased high
~ = No DWM Residential or Non-Residential screening level
Bold values exceed the residential soil gas screening level
Risk Calculations were only performed for samples that contained one or more analyte concentration in exceedence of the DWM Residential Screening Levels
TABLE 3.3
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS DETECTED IN SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS
FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL
800 MANNING STREET
KINSTON, LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MID-ATLANTIC PROJECT NO. 000R2611.00 T4055
ANALYTE
DWM Residential Soil
Gas Vapor Intrusion
Screening Levels
March 2016 (µg/m³)
DWM Non-
Residential Soil Gas
Vapor Intrusion
Screening Levels
March 2016
(µg/m³)
SAMPLE LOCATION
COLLECTION DATE
ANALYTE CONCENTRATION
(µg/m³)
MATERIAL GENERAL LOCATION & APPROXIMATE
QUANTITY
TYPE AND PERCENTAGE OF
ASBESTOS PRESENT
Vinyl Sheet Flooring Under Carpet Office areas
(800 sq/ft)15% Chrysotile
Exterior Door Caulk Exterior Doors
(25 ln/ft)6% Chrysotile
Roofing Debris
(Paint on Gravel)
Side Porch
(50 sq/ft)5% Chrysotile
Stoop Mastic Above Side Entrance
(10 ln/ft)6% Chrysotile
Exterior Window Glazing
(Metal Windows)
Front of Building
(15 ln/ft)3% Chrysotile
Roof Shingles Roof
(1,000 sq/ft)18% Chrysotile
Roof Flashing Roof Perimeter
(50 ln/ft)4% Chrysotile
Fire Doors Throughout
(Unknown)Assumed
Exterior Door Caulk
(Brown)
Exterior Doors
(100 ln/ft)5-6% Chrysotile
Tan Vinyl Sheet Flooring
(Speckled Pattern)
Cafeteria
(1,300 sq/ft)15% Chrysotile
Black Mastic AC Units
(500 sq/ft)10% Chrysotile
Thermal System Insulation
(Debris)
Crawlspace
(Unknown)
25-28% Amosite
2-5% Chrysotile
Window Glazing Basement
(30 ln/ft)2% Chrysotile
Roof Flashing Roof Perimeter
(2,500 ln/ft)3% Chrysotile
Exterior Window Glazing Roof Windows
(500 ln/ft)2% Chrysotile
Notes:
2. Table reproduced based on Matrix Health & Safety Consultants, LLC. "Survey for the presence of Asbestos-Containing
Materials and Lead-Based Paints" dated August 23, 2016
3. Wall or side A is typically the side of the main entrance, then moving clockwise would be wall/side B,C, or D
1. Analysis Method: EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
BUILDING TWO - OFFICE
BUILDING THREE - MANUFACTURING
TABLE 3.4
SUMMARY OF ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY RESULTS
FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL
800 MANNING STREET
KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA
MID-ATLANTIC JOB NO. 000R2611.00 T4055
COMPONENT SUBSTRATE COLOR LOCATION
LEAD
CONTENT
(mg/cm²)
CONDITION
Exterior Fascia Wood Blue All Sides >9.9 Deteriorated
Exterior Soffit Wood White All Sides >9.9 Deteriorated
Exterior Window
Casing and Sash Wood White Sides B, C,
and D >9.9 Deteriorated
Exterior Corner
Board Metal Light Green Side A >9.9 Intact
Exterior Soffit and
Support Wood Wood Side A 7.3 - >9.9 Deteriorated
Interior Window
Sash Wood Gray Foyer (Side A)4.4 Deteriorated
Interior Wall Brick Blue Foyer (Side B)1.0 Deteriorated
Interior Columns
(Posts)Brick Dark Blue Manufacturing
Area 6.7 Deteriorated
Interior Railing Metal Yellow Chiller Room 1.0 Intact
Interior Column
(Posts)Wood Blue Manufacturing
Area 4.1 Deteriorated
Interior Sliding
Door Metal Blue Manufacturing
Area 2.1 Deteriorated
Interior Door Metal Blue Basement 3.8 Deteriorated
Interior Window
Casing and Sash Metal Gray Basement 5.1 - 9.6 Deteriorated
Notes:
2. Table reproduced based on Matrix Health & Safety Consultants, LLC. "Survey for the presence
of Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints" dated August 23, 2016
3. Wall or side A is typically the side of the main entrance, then moving clockwise would be wall/side B,C, or D
1. Matrix used an LPA-1 Lead Paint Spectrum Analyzer (XRF) to determine lead content
BUILDING THREE - MANUFACTURING
BUILDING TWO - OFFICE
TABLE 3.5
SUMMARY OF LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY RESULTS
FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL
800 MANNING STREET
KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA
MID-ATLANTIC JOB NO. 000R2611.00 T4055
Parameter Method Units Result Qualif RL Parameter Method Units Result Qualif RL
Lead 6010D ug/L 19 --0.062 Lead 6010D ug/L 16 --0.058 17.5 3 17.1 118.8 Good/Acceptable
Silver 6010D ug/L U 0.0083 Silver 6010D ug/L U 0.0078
Arsenic 6010D ug/L 24 --0.041 Arsenic 6010D ug/L 20 --0.038 22 4 18.2 120.0 Good/Acceptable
Barium 6010D ug/L 74 --0.098 Barium 6010D ug/L 83 --0.092 78.5 9 11.5 89.2 Good/Acceptable
Cadmium 6010D ug/L U 0.009 Cadmium 6010D ug/L U 0.0084Chromium6010Dug/L 3.6 --0.056 Chromium 6010D ug/L 4 --0.053 3.8 0.4 10.5 90.0 Good/Acceptable
Selenium 6010D ug/L 2 --0.16 Selenium 6010D ug/L 2.2 --0.15 2.1 0.2 9.5 90.9 Good/AcceptableMercury7471Bug/L 0.12 --0.0015 Mercury 7471B ug/L 0.14 --0.0013 0.13 0.02 15.4 85.7 Good/Acceptable
Ethylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00028 Ethylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00031
Styrene 8260B ug/L U 0.00045 Styrene 8260B ug/L U 0.00049
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00025 cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00027
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00039 trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00043n-Propylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00044 n-Propylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00048
n-Butylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00038 n-Butylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.000414-Chlorotoluene 8260B ug/L U 0.00044 4-Chlorotoluene 8260B ug/L U 0.00048
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00029 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00032
1,2-Dibromoethane 8260B ug/L U 0.0003 1,2-Dibromoethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00033
1,2-Dichloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00044 1,2-Dichloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00048
Vinyl acetate 8260B ug/L U 0.001 Vinyl acetate 8260B ug/L U 0.0011
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 8260B ug/L U 0.00063 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 8260B ug/L U 0.00069
Isopropyl Ether 8260B ug/L U 0.0003 Isopropyl Ether 8260B ug/L U 0.00033m,p-Xylenes 8260B ug/L U 0.00068 m,p-Xylenes 8260B ug/L U 0.00075
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00056 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00061Bromobenzene8260Bug/L U 0.00062 Bromobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00068
Toluene 8260B ug/L U 0.00043 Toluene 8260B ug/L U 0.00046
Chlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00039 Chlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00043
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L 0.0046 JD 0.00055 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.0006
Dibromochloromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00031 Dibromochloromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00033
Tetrachloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00035 Tetrachloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00039
Xylenes, total 8260B ug/L U 0.0014 Xylenes, total 8260B ug/L U 0.0015sec-Butylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00036 sec-Butylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00039
1,3-Dichloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.00037 1,3-Dichloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.00041cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00032 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00034
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00044 trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00048
Methyl-tert-Butyl Ether 8260B ug/L U 0.00024 Methyl-tert-Butyl Ether 8260B ug/L U 0.00026
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00049 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00054
Carbon Tetrachloride 8260B ug/L U 0.00037 Carbon Tetrachloride 8260B ug/L U 0.00041,1-Dichloropropylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00041 1,1-Dichloropropylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00044
Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone)8260B ug/L U 0.00067 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone)8260B ug/L U 0.000732,2-Dichloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.00035 2,2-Dichloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.00039
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00061 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00067
Acetone 8260B ug/L U 0.0018 Acetone 8260B ug/L U 0.002
Chloroform 8260B ug/L U 0.00054 Chloroform 8260B ug/L U 0.00058
Benzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00043 Benzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00047
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00036 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00039
Bromomethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00091 Bromomethane 8260B ug/L U 0.001Chloromethane8260Bug/L U 0.0005 Chloromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00054
Bromochloromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00041 Bromochloromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00045Chloroethane8260Bug/L U 0.00062 Chloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00068
Vinyl chloride 8260B ug/L U 0.00036 Vinyl chloride 8260B ug/L U 0.00039
Methylene Chloride 8260B ug/L 0.039 --0.00042 Methylene Chloride 8260B ug/L 0.027 --0.00045 0.033 0.012 36.4 144.4 Slightly High
Bromoform 8260B ug/L U 0.00084 Bromoform 8260B ug/L U 0.00092
Bromodichloromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00041 Bromodichloromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.000451,1-Dichloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00021 1,1-Dichloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00023
1,1-Dichloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00033 1,1-Dichloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00036Trichlorofluoromethane8260Bug/L U 0.00048 Trichlorofluoromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00052
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00034 Dichlorodifluoromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00037
1,2-Dichloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.00046 1,2-Dichloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.0005
Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)8260B ug/L U 0.00067 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)8260B ug/L U 0.00073
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00066 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.00072
Trichloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00048 Trichloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00052
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.0005 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.000551,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L 0.0044 JD 0.00042 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00046
Naphthalene 8260B ug/L 0.0055 JD 0.00023 Naphthalene 8260B ug/L 0.0043 JD 0.00026 0.0049 0.0012 24.5 127.9 Good/Acceptableo-Xylene 8260B ug/L U 0.0003 o-Xylene 8260B ug/L U 0.00033
2-Chlorotoluene 8260B ug/L U 0.00038 2-Chlorotoluene 8260B ug/L U 0.00042
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00035 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00038
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00057 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00062
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.00095 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.001
tert-Butylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00025 tert-Butylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.00027
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)8260B ug/L U 0.00044 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)8260B ug/L U 0.000484-Isopropyltoluene 8260B ug/L U 0.00036 4-Isopropyltoluene 8260B ug/L U 0.00039
4-Nitrophenol 8270D ug/L U 0.34 4-Nitrophenol 8270D ug/L U 0.97
Benzyl alcohol 8270D ug/L U 0.29 Benzyl alcohol 8270D ug/L U 0.83
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 8270D ug/L U 0.38 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 8270D ug/L U 1.1
Azobenzene 8270D ug/L U 0.29 Azobenzene 8270D ug/L U 0.83
2,4-Dimethylphenol 8270D ug/L U 0.34 2,4-Dimethylphenol 8270D ug/L U 0.97
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 0.32 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 0.924-Chloroaniline 8270D ug/L U 0.27 4-Chloroaniline 8270D ug/L U 0.76
8/3/2016SAMPLING DATE:Absolute Difference
between
Results
SB-5 DUPLICATE
800 MANNING STREET
TABLE 4.1
SOIL SAMPLE/SAMPLE DUPLICATE COMPARISON: "SB-5" AND "DUPLICATE"FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL
Variability (Note 1)
(Based on %RPD)
PRIMARY SAMPLE: DUPLICATE SAMPLE:
% RPD (Note 1)
[((x1-x2)/AVG) * 100]
KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA
MID-ATLANTIC JOB NO. 000R2611.00 T4055
% Ratio (Note 2)
[(x1/x2) * 100]
AVG. of Results for RPD Calc.
SAMPLING DATE:8/3/2016
Page 1 of 2
Parameter Method Units Result Qualif RL Parameter Method Units Result Qualif RL
8/3/2016SAMPLING DATE:Absolute Difference
between
Results
SB-5 DUPLICATE
800 MANNING STREET
TABLE 4.1
SOIL SAMPLE/SAMPLE DUPLICATE COMPARISON: "SB-5" AND "DUPLICATE"
FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL
Variability (Note 1)
(Based on %RPD)
PRIMARY SAMPLE: DUPLICATE SAMPLE:
% RPD (Note 1)
[((x1-x2)/AVG) * 100]
KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINAMID-ATLANTIC JOB NO. 000R2611.00 T4055
% Ratio (Note 2)
[(x1/x2) * 100]
AVG. of Results for RPD Calc.
SAMPLING DATE:8/3/2016
3/4-Methylphenol 8270D ug/L U 0.27 3/4-Methylphenol 8270D ug/L U 0.78Phenol8270Dug/L U 0.33 Phenol 8270D ug/L U 0.93
Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 8270D ug/L U 0.31 Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 8270D ug/L U 0.89bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 8270D ug/L U 0.38 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 8270D ug/L U 1.1
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 8270D ug/L U 0.33 Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 8270D ug/L U 0.93
Di-n-octyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 0.27 Di-n-octyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 0.77
Hexachlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 0.35 Hexachlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 1
Anthracene 8270D ug/L U 0.36 Anthracene 8270D ug/L U 11,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 0.35 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 0.98
2,4-Dichlorophenol 8270D ug/L U 0.43 2,4-Dichlorophenol 8270D ug/L U 1.22,4-Dinitrotoluene 8270D ug/L U 0.27 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 8270D ug/L U 0.77
Pyrene 8270D ug/L 1.4 JD 0.29 Pyrene 8270D ug/L 4.3 JD 0.83 2.85 2.9 101.8 32.6 High
Dimethyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 0.29 Dimethyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 0.83
Dibenzofuran 8270D ug/L 0.82 JD 0.34 Dibenzofuran 8270D ug/L U 0.96
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 8270D ug/L U 0.24 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 8270D ug/L U 0.69
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 8270D ug/L U 0.25 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 8270D ug/L U 0.72
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 8270D ug/L 0.95 JD 0.26 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 8270D ug/L 2.2 JD 0.73 1.575 1.25 79.4 43.2 High
Fluoranthene 8270D ug/L 1.2 JD 0.28 Fluoranthene 8270D ug/L 3.5 JD 0.8 2.35 2.3 97.9 34.3 High
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 8270D ug/L U 0.29 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 8270D ug/L U 0.83Acenaphthylene8270Dug/L U 0.32 Acenaphthylene 8270D ug/L 1.6 JD 0.91
Chrysene 8270D ug/L 1.3 JD 0.28 Chrysene 8270D ug/L 3.7 JD 0.79 2.5 2.4 96.0 35.1 High
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 8270D ug/L U 0.38 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 8270D ug/L U 1.1
Benzo(a)pyrene 8270D ug/L 0.62 JD 0.24 Benzo(a)pyrene 8270D ug/L U 0.68
2,4-Dinitrophenol 8270D ug/L UA 0.31 2,4-Dinitrophenol 8270D ug/L UA 0.884,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 8270D ug/L U 0.33 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 8270D ug/L U 0.95
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 8270D ug/L U 0.27 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 8270D ug/L U 0.771,3-Dichlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 0.31 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 0.89
Benzo(a)anthracene 8270D ug/L 0.81 JD 0.29 Benzo(a)anthracene 8270D ug/L 2 JD 0.82 1.405 1.19 84.7 40.5 High
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 8270D ug/L U 0.31 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 8270D ug/L U 0.88
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 8270D ug/L U 0.29 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 8270D ug/L U 0.84
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 8270D ug/L U 0.35 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 8270D ug/L U 0.99
Benzoic Acid 8270D ug/L U 0.19 Benzoic Acid 8270D ug/L U 0.53
Hexachloroethane 8270D ug/L U 0.37 Hexachloroethane 8270D ug/L U 1.14-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 8270D ug/L U 0.29 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 8270D ug/L U 0.82
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 8270D ug/L U 0.4 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 8270D ug/L U 1.1Isophorone8270Dug/L U 0.3 Isophorone 8270D ug/L U 0.85
Acenaphthene 8270D ug/L U 0.3 Acenaphthene 8270D ug/L U 0.86
Diethyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 0.31 Diethyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 0.87
Di-n-butyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 0.32 Di-n-butyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 0.89
Phenanthrene 8270D ug/L 2.7 --0.29 Phenanthrene 8270D ug/L 6.6 --0.82 4.65 3.9 83.9 40.9 High
Butyl benzyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 0.32 Butyl benzyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 0.9
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 8270D ug/L U 0.34 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 8270D ug/L U 0.96Fluorene8270Dug/L U 0.32 Fluorene 8270D ug/L U 0.9
Hexachlorobutadiene 8270D ug/L U 0.4 Hexachlorobutadiene 8270D ug/L U 1.1
Pentachlorophenol 8270D ug/L UA 0.26 Pentachlorophenol 8270D ug/L UA 0.74
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 8270D ug/L U 0.42 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 8270D ug/L U 1.2
2-Nitrophenol 8270D ug/L U 0.4 2-Nitrophenol 8270D ug/L U 1.1
1-Methylnaphthalene 8270D ug/L 2.2 --0.43 1-Methylnaphthalene 8270D ug/L 3.6 JD 1.2 2.9 1.4 48.3 61.1 Slightly High
Naphthalene 8270D ug/L 1.7 JD 0.36 Naphthalene 8270D ug/L 6.1 JD 1 3.9 4.4 112.8 27.9 High
2-Methylnaphthalene 8270D ug/L 2.5 --0.35 2-Methylnaphthalene 8270D ug/L 4.3 JD 1 3.4 1.8 52.9 58.1 High
2-Chloronaphthalene 8270D ug/L U 0.32 2-Chloronaphthalene 8270D ug/L U 0.913,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 8270D ug/L U 0.44 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 8270D ug/L U 1.2
2-Methylphenol 8270D ug/L U 0.28 2-Methylphenol 8270D ug/L U 0.81
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 0.34 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 0.96
2-Chlorophenol 8270D ug/L U 0.31 2-Chlorophenol 8270D ug/L U 0.89
Nitrobenzene 8270D ug/L U 0.32 Nitrobenzene 8270D ug/L U 0.89
Note 1
Note 2 Bold Concentrations = Analyte detected in both primary and duplicate samples. Comparison Shown in Table.
Blank Cells = Consituent not detected, or below the method detection limit (MDL).
J = Detected, but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result is an estimated concentration.
U = Constituent not detected above the method detection limit (MDL), which is lower than the reporting limit (RL).
D = RPD Value outisde of the control limits.A = Average response is below established range. CCV response is within range.
--= No qualifer assigned to constituent by laboratory.
= The relative percent difference (RPD) and percent ratio were calculated for each pair (see formulas in column headings). Variability was evaluated based on % RPD: Good/Acceptable (<35%), Slightly High (>35% but <50%) and High (%50).= Ratios closer to 100 indicate lower variability between the primary sample and duplicate results compared with ratios closer to 0.
Page 2 of 2
Parameter Method Units Result Qualif RL Parameter Method Units Result Qualif RL
4-Nitroaniline 8270D ug/L U 0.93 4-Nitroaniline 8270D ug/L U 0.93
4-Nitrophenol 8270D ug/L UA 0.6 4-Nitrophenol 8270D ug/L UA 0.6
Benzyl alcohol 8270D ug/L U 2.1 Benzyl alcohol 8270D ug/L U 2.1
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 8270D ug/L U 1.3 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 8270D ug/L U 1.3
Azobenzene 8270D ug/L U 1.8 Azobenzene 8270D ug/L U 1.82,4-Dimethylphenol 8270D ug/L U 3.4 2,4-Dimethylphenol 8270D ug/L U 3.4
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 1.6 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 1.64-Chloroaniline 8270D ug/L U 2.4 4-Chloroaniline 8270D ug/L U 2.4
3/4-Methylphenol 8270D ug/L U 1.5 3/4-Methylphenol 8270D ug/L U 1.5
Phenol 8270D ug/L U 0.98 Phenol 8270D ug/L U 0.98
Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 8270D ug/L U 2.3 Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 8270D ug/L U 2.3
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 8270D ug/L U 2.6 bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 8270D ug/L U 2.6Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 8270D ug/L U 1.3 Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 8270D ug/L U 1.3
Di-n-octyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 1.3 Di-n-octyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 1.3Hexachlorobenzene8270Dug/L U 1.3 Hexachlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 1.3
Anthracene 8270D ug/L U 1.4 Anthracene 8270D ug/L U 1.4
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 1.8 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 1.8
2,4-Dichlorophenol 8270D ug/L U 2.6 2,4-Dichlorophenol 8270D ug/L U 2.6
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 8270D ug/L U 1.4 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 8270D ug/L U 1.4
Pyrene 8270D ug/L U 1.4 Pyrene 8270D ug/L U 1.4
Dimethyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 1.4 Dimethyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 1.4Dibenzofuran8270Dug/L U 1.8 Dibenzofuran 8270D ug/L U 1.8
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 8270D ug/L U 1.4 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 8270D ug/L U 1.4Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 8270D ug/L U 3.9 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 8270D ug/L U 3.9
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 8270D ug/L U 1.1 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 8270D ug/L U 1.1
Fluoranthene 8270D ug/L U 1.7 Fluoranthene 8270D ug/L U 1.7
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 8270D ug/L U 1.4 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 8270D ug/L U 1.4
Acenaphthylene 8270D ug/L U 2 Acenaphthylene 8270D ug/L U 2
Chrysene 8270D ug/L U 1.4 Chrysene 8270D ug/L U 1.4
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 8270D ug/L U 2 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 8270D ug/L U 2Benzo(a)pyrene 8270D ug/L U 1.4 Benzo(a)pyrene 8270D ug/L U 1.4
2,4-Dinitrophenol 8270D ug/L UA 2.7 2,4-Dinitrophenol 8270D ug/L UA 2.74,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 8270D ug/L U 1.4 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 8270D ug/L U 1.4
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 8270D ug/L U 1.2 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 8270D ug/L U 1.2
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 1.9 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 1.9
Benzo(a)anthracene 8270D ug/L U 1.4 Benzo(a)anthracene 8270D ug/L U 1.4
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 8270D ug/L U 2.4 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 8270D ug/L U 2.42,6-Dinitrotoluene 8270D ug/L U 1.1 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 8270D ug/L U 1.1
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 8270D ug/L U 2.2 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 8270D ug/L U 2.2Aniline8270Dug/L U 2.4 Aniline 8270D ug/L U 2.4
Benzoic Acid 8270D ug/L U 4.7 Benzoic Acid 8270D ug/L U 4.7
Hexachloroethane 8270D ug/L U 1.7 Hexachloroethane 8270D ug/L U 1.7
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 8270D ug/L U 1.3 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 8270D ug/L U 1.3
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 8270D ug/L U 1.7 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 8270D ug/L U 1.7
Isophorone 8270D ug/L U 2.5 Isophorone 8270D ug/L U 2.5
Acenaphthene 8270D ug/L U 1.8 Acenaphthene 8270D ug/L U 1.8Diethyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 3.3 Diethyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 3.3
Di-n-butyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 1.7 Di-n-butyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 1.7Phenanthrene8270Dug/L U 1.5 Phenanthrene 8270D ug/L U 1.5
Butyl benzyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 1.4 Butyl benzyl phthalate 8270D ug/L U 1.4
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 8270D ug/L U 1.3 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 8270D ug/L U 1.3
Fluorene 8270D ug/L U 1.7 Fluorene 8270D ug/L U 1.7
Hexachlorobutadiene 8270D ug/L U 2.1 Hexachlorobutadiene 8270D ug/L U 2.1Pentachlorophenol8270Dug/L U 1.2 Pentachlorophenol 8270D ug/L U 1.2
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 8270D ug/L U 1.8 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 8270D ug/L U 1.82-Nitroaniline 8270D ug/L U 1.4 2-Nitroaniline 8270D ug/L U 1.4
2-Nitrophenol 8270D ug/L U 2.4 2-Nitrophenol 8270D ug/L U 2.4
1-Methylnaphthalene 8270D ug/L U 2.6 1-Methylnaphthalene 8270D ug/L U 2.6
Naphthalene 8270D ug/L U 2.6 Naphthalene 8270D ug/L U 2.6
2-Methylnaphthalene 8270D ug/L U 2.4 2-Methylnaphthalene 8270D ug/L U 2.4
2-Chloronaphthalene 8270D ug/L U 2.7 2-Chloronaphthalene 8270D ug/L U 2.7
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 8270D ug/L U 1.4 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 8270D ug/L U 1.42-Methylphenol 8270D ug/L U 1.8 2-Methylphenol 8270D ug/L U 1.8
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 1.6 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8270D ug/L U 1.62-Chlorophenol 8270D ug/L U 1.9 2-Chlorophenol 8270D ug/L U 1.9
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 8270D ug/L U 1.6 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 8270D ug/L U 1.6
Nitrobenzene 8270D ug/L U 2.6 Nitrobenzene 8270D ug/L U 2.6
3-Nitroaniline 8270D ug/L U 1.4 3-Nitroaniline 8270D ug/L U 1.4
Ethylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.061 Ethylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.061
Styrene 8260B ug/L U 0.047 Styrene 8260B ug/L U 0.047
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene 8260B ug/L U 0.079 cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene 8260B ug/L U 0.079trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene 8260B ug/L U 0.07 trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene 8260B ug/L U 0.07
n-Propylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.087 n-Propylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.087
n-Butylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.076 n-Butylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.076
4-Chlorotoluene 8260B ug/L U 0.05 4-Chlorotoluene 8260B ug/L U 0.05
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.05 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.05
1,2-Dibromoethane 8260B ug/L U 0.051 1,2-Dibromoethane 8260B ug/L U 0.051
Acrolein 8260B ug/L U 0.2 Acrolein 8260B ug/L U 0.21,2-Dichloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.066 1,2-Dichloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.066
800 MANNING STREET
TABLE 4.2
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE/SAMPLE DUPLICATE COMPARISON: "MW-2" AND "DUPLICATE"FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL
Variability (Note 1)
(Based on %RPD)
PRIMARY SAMPLE: DUPLICATE SAMPLE:
% RPD (Note 1)
[((x1-x2)/AVG) * 100]
KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA
MID-ATLANTIC JOB NO. 000R2611.00 T4055
% Ratio (Note 2)
[(x1/x2) * 100]
AVG. of Results for RPD Calc.
SAMPLING DATE:8/4/2016 8/4/2016SAMPLING DATE:Absolute Difference
between
Results
MW-2 DUPLICATE
Page 1 of 2
Parameter Method Units Result Qualif RL Parameter Method Units Result Qualif RL
800 MANNING STREET
TABLE 4.2
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE/SAMPLE DUPLICATE COMPARISON: "MW-2" AND "DUPLICATE"FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL
Variability (Note 1)
(Based on %RPD)
PRIMARY SAMPLE: DUPLICATE SAMPLE:
% RPD (Note 1)
[((x1-x2)/AVG) * 100]
KINSTON, NORTH CAROLINA
MID-ATLANTIC JOB NO. 000R2611.00 T4055
% Ratio (Note 2)
[(x1/x2) * 100]
AVG. of Results for RPD Calc.
SAMPLING DATE:8/4/2016 8/4/2016SAMPLING DATE:Absolute
Difference
between Results
MW-2 DUPLICATE
Acrylonitrile 8260B ug/L U 0.2 Acrylonitrile 8260B ug/L U 0.2
Vinyl acetate 8260B ug/L U 0.06 Vinyl acetate 8260B ug/L U 0.06
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 8260B ug/L U 0.078 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 8260B ug/L U 0.078
Isopropyl Ether 8260B ug/L U 0.05 Isopropyl Ether 8260B ug/L U 0.05
m,p-Xylenes 8260B ug/L 0.59 J 0.12 m,p-Xylenes 8260B ug/L 0.56 J 0.12 0.575 0.03 5.2 105.4 Good/Acceptable
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.076 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.076Bromobenzene8260Bug/L U 0.057 Bromobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.057
Toluene 8260B ug/L U 0.044 Toluene 8260B ug/L U 0.044Chlorobenzene8260Bug/L U 0.062 Chlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.062
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.13 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.13
Dibromochloromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.081 Dibromochloromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.081
Tetrachloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.098 Tetrachloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.098
sec-Butylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.076 sec-Butylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.0761,3-Dichloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.043 1,3-Dichloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.043
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.056 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.056trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.094 trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.094
Methyl-tert-Butyl Ether 8260B ug/L U 0.042 Methyl-tert-Butyl Ether 8260B ug/L U 0.042
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.054 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.054
Carbon Tetrachloride 8260B ug/L U 0.11 Carbon Tetrachloride 8260B ug/L U 0.11
1,1-Dichloropropylene 8260B ug/L U 0.051 1,1-Dichloropropylene 8260B ug/L U 0.051
Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone)8260B ug/L U 0.065 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone)8260B ug/L U 0.065
2,2-Dichloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.11 2,2-Dichloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.111,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.11 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.11
Acetone 8260B ug/L U 0.31 Acetone 8260B ug/L U 0.31Chloroform8260Bug/L U 0.076 Chloroform 8260B ug/L U 0.076
Benzene 8260B ug/L U 0.048 Benzene 8260B ug/L U 0.048
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.061 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.061
Bromomethane 8260B ug/L U 0.18 Bromomethane 8260B ug/L U 0.18
Chloromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.079 Chloromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.079
Dibromomethane 8260B ug/L U 0.065 Dibromomethane 8260B ug/L U 0.065
Bromochloromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.14 Bromochloromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.14Chloroethane8260Bug/L U 0.22 Chloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.22
Vinyl chloride 8260B ug/L U 0.097 Vinyl chloride 8260B ug/L U 0.097Methylene Chloride 8260B ug/L U 0.083 Methylene Chloride 8260B ug/L U 0.083
Carbon disulfide 8260B ug/L U 0.075 Carbon disulfide 8260B ug/L U 0.075
Bromoform 8260B ug/L U 0.04 Bromoform 8260B ug/L U 0.04
Bromodichloromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.062 Bromodichloromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.062
1,1-Dichloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.083 1,1-Dichloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.0831,1-Dichloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.083 1,1-Dichloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.083
Trichlorofluoromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.062 Trichlorofluoromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.062Dichlorodifluoromethane8260Bug/L U 0.11 Dichlorodifluoromethane 8260B ug/L U 0.11
1,2-Dichloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.11 1,2-Dichloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.11
Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)8260B ug/L U 0.24 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)8260B ug/L U 0.24
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.066 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.066
Trichloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.078 Trichloroethylene 8260B ug/L U 0.078
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.036 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8260B ug/L U 0.036
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.4 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.4Hexachlorobutadiene8260Bug/L U 0.16 Hexachlorobutadiene 8260B ug/L U 0.16
Naphthalene 8260B ug/L U 0.19 Naphthalene 8260B ug/L U 0.19o-Xylene 8260B ug/L U 0.044 o-Xylene 8260B ug/L U 0.044
2-Chlorotoluene 8260B ug/L U 0.066 2-Chlorotoluene 8260B ug/L U 0.066
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.076 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.076
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.054 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.054
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.17 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.171,2,3-Trichloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.14 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8260B ug/L U 0.14
tert-Butylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.088 tert-Butylbenzene 8260B ug/L U 0.088Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)8260B ug/L U 0.054 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)8260B ug/L U 0.054
4-Isopropyltoluene 8260B ug/L U 0.089 4-Isopropyltoluene 8260B ug/L U 0.089
Note 1
Note 2
Bold Concentrations = Analyte detected in both primary and duplicate samples. Comparison Shown in Table.
Blank Cells = Consituent not detected, or below the method detection limit (MDL).J = Detected, but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result is an estimated concentration.
U = Constituent not detected above the method detection limit (MDL), which is lower than the reporting limit (RL).A = Average response is below established range. CCV response is within range.
= The relative percent difference (RPD) and percent ratio were calculated for each pair (see formulas in column headings). Variability was evaluated based on % RPD: Good/Acceptable (<35%), Slightly High (>35% but <50%) and High (%50).= Ratios closer to 100 indicate lower variability between the primary sample and duplicate results compared with ratios closer to 0.
Page 2 of 2
Parameter Method Units Result Qualif RL Parameter Method Units Result Qualif RL
Bromomethane TO-15 ug/m³--1.6 Bromomethane TO-15 ug/m³--1.6
Chloroethane TO-15 ug/m³--1.1 Chloroethane TO-15 ug/m³--1.1
Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)TO-15 ug/m³24 --2.3 Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)TO-15 ug/m³28 --2.3 26 4 15.4 85.7 Good/Acceptable
1,1-Dichloroethene TO-15 ug/m³--1.6 1,1-Dichloroethene TO-15 ug/m³--1.6
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (F113)TO-15 ug/m³--3.1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (F113)TO-15 ug/m³--3.1
Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12)TO-15 ug/m³--4.0 Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12)TO-15 ug/m³--4.0
Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)TO-15 ug/m³--1.4 Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)TO-15 ug/m³--1.4
Carbon disulfide TO-15 ug/m³--1.3 Carbon disulfide TO-15 ug/m³2.3 --1.3
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene TO-15 ug/m³--1.6 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene TO-15 ug/m³--1.6
1,1-Dichloroethane TO-15 ug/m³--1.6 1,1-Dichloroethane TO-15 ug/m³--1.6
2-Butanone (MEK)TO-15 ug/m³8.2 --2.4 2-Butanone (MEK)TO-15 ug/m³7.4 --2.4 7.8 0.8 10.3 110.8 Good/Acceptable
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene TO-15 ug/m³--1.6 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene TO-15 ug/m³1.8 --1.6
Chloroform TO-15 ug/m³1.7 --1.0 Chloroform TO-15 ug/m³1.7 --1.0 1.7 0 0.0 100.0 Good/Acceptable
1,1,1-Trichloroethane TO-15 ug/m³--2.2 1,1,1-Trichloroethane TO-15 ug/m³--2.2
1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)TO-15 ug/m³--1.6 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)TO-15 ug/m³--1.6
Benzene TO-15 ug/m³2.3 --0.6 Benzene TO-15 ug/m³1.8 --0.6 2.05 0.5 24.4 127.8 Good/Acceptable
Carbon tetrachloride TO-15 ug/m³--1.3 Carbon tetrachloride TO-15 ug/m³--1.3
Trichloroethene TO-15 ug/m³--2.2 Trichloroethene TO-15 ug/m³12 --2.2
1,2-Dichloropropane TO-15 ug/m³--1.9 1,2-Dichloropropane TO-15 ug/m³--1.9
Bromodichloromethane TO-15 ug/m³--2.7 Bromodichloromethane TO-15 ug/m³--2.7
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene TO-15 ug/m³--1.8 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene TO-15 ug/m³--1.8
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)TO-15 ug/m³--3.3 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)TO-15 ug/m³--3.3
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene TO-15 ug/m³--1.8 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene TO-15 ug/m³--1.8
Toluene TO-15 ug/m³5.2 --3.1 Toluene TO-15 ug/m³4.2 --3.1 4.7 1 21.3 123.8 Good/Acceptable
1,1,2-Trichloroethane TO-15 ug/m³--2.2 1,1,2-Trichloroethane TO-15 ug/m³--2.2
2-Hexanone (MBK)TO-15 ug/m³--3.3 2-Hexanone (MBK)TO-15 ug/m³--3.3
Dibromochloromethane TO-15 ug/m³--3.5 Dibromochloromethane TO-15 ug/m³--3.5
Tetrachloroethene TO-15 ug/m³5.0 --2.8 Tetrachloroethene TO-15 ug/m³5.2 --2.8 5.1 0.2 3.9 96.2 Good/Acceptable
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)TO-15 ug/m³--3.1 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)TO-15 ug/m³--3.1
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane TO-15 ug/m³--2.8 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane TO-15 ug/m³--2.8
Chlorobenzene TO-15 ug/m³--1.9 Chlorobenzene TO-15 ug/m³--1.9
Ethylbenzene TO-15 ug/m³--1.8 Ethylbenzene TO-15 ug/m³--1.8
m,p-Xylene TO-15 ug/m³3.1 --1.8 m,p-Xylene TO-15 ug/m³2.5 --1.8 2.8 0.6 21.4 124.0 Good/Acceptable
Styrene TO-15 ug/m³--1.7 Styrene TO-15 ug/m³--1.7
o-Xylene TO-15 ug/m³--1.8 o-Xylene TO-15 ug/m³--1.8
Bromoform TO-15 ug/m³--4.2 Bromoform TO-15 ug/m³--4.2
Chloromethane TO-15 ug/m³--0.8 Chloromethane TO-15 ug/m³--0.8
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane TO-15 ug/m³--2.8 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane TO-15 ug/m³--2.8
4-Ethyltoluene TO-15 ug/m³--2.0 4-Ethyltoluene TO-15 ug/m³--2.0
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene TO-15 ug/m³--2.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene TO-15 ug/m³--2.0
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (F114)TO-15 ug/m³--2.8 Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (F114)TO-15 ug/m³--2.8
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene TO-15 ug/m³--2.0 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene TO-15 ug/m³--2.0
1,3-Dichlorobenzene TO-15 ug/m³--2.4 1,3-Dichlorobenzene TO-15 ug/m³--2.4
1,4-Dichlorobenzene TO-15 ug/m³--2.4 1,4-Dichlorobenzene TO-15 ug/m³--2.4
1,2-Dichlorobenzene TO-15 ug/m³--2.4 1,2-Dichlorobenzene TO-15 ug/m³--2.4
Vinyl chloride TO-15 ug/m³--0.5 Vinyl chloride TO-15 ug/m³--0.5
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene TO-15 ug/m³--7.5 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene TO-15 ug/m³--7.5
Hexachlorobutadiene TO-15 ug/m³--11 Hexachlorobutadiene TO-15 ug/m³--11
Note 1
Note 2
Bold Concentrations = Analyte detected in both primary and duplicate samples. Comparison Shown in Table.
Blank Cells = Consituent not detected, or below the method detection limit (MDL).
--= No qualifer assigned to constituent by laboratory.
FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL
TABLE 4.3SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS SAMPLE/SAMPLE DUPLICATE COMPARISON: "VP-5" AND "DUPLICATE"
800 MANNING STREET
Variability (Note 1)
(Based on %RPD)
PRIMARY SAMPLE: DUPLICATE SAMPLE:
% RPD (Note 1)
[((x1-x2)/AVG) * 100]
KINSTON, LENOIR COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MID-ATLANTIC JOB NO. 000R2611.00 T4055
% Ratio (Note 2)
[(x1/x2) * 100]
AVG. of
Results for
RPD Calc.
SAMPLING DATE:8/19/2016 8/19/2016SAMPLING DATE:
= The relative percent difference (RPD) and percent ratio were calculated for each pair (see formulas in column headings). Variability was evaluated based on % RPD: Good/Acceptable (<35%), Slightly High (>35% but <50%) and High (%50).
= Ratios closer to 100 indicate lower variability between the primary sample and duplicate results compared with ratios closer to 0.
Absolute
Difference
between Results
VP-5 DUPLICATE
Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX A

SOIL BORING LOGS AND PERMANENT
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORDS
Construction Details
COMMENTS:in - indicates inches N/A - indicates not applicable to this boring TVA - Toxic Vapor Analyzer
ft - indicates depth in feet ppm - indicates parts per million FID - Flame Ionization Detector
ft BLS - indicates feet below land surface DPT - Direct Push Technology PWR - Partially Weathered Rock
24 24
Black, dense/compacted, clay (CL)
16 16
18 18
20 20
22 22
6
8 8
Light tan, sand (SP) - hydrated
10 10
12 12
14 14
Bright orange, sand (SP)3'-4'
Bentonite Bentonite4 4
Light tan, sand (SP)
4'-15'
Sand Sand5'-15'
Screen
6
ft

-
B
L
S
SOIL DESCRIPTION (color, texture, moisture, etc.)
ft
-
B
L
S
Asphalt and Organics
0'-3'
Grout 0' - 5'
Casing
GroutOrange, compacted clay (CL)2 2
Date Completed:8/4/2016 Monitoring Equipment:NA Technician:K. Johnson
Date Started:8/4/2016 Driller :Quantex, Inc.Longitude:NA
Location: Kinston, NC Subcontractor/Drillers: Quantex, Inc.Latitude:NA
Project Number:R2611.00 T4055 Sampling Method:Macrocore Top of Casing Elev. (ft):NA
Site Name: Former Glen Raven Mills Drilling/Boring Method:Geoprobe DPT Total Boring Depth (ft):15.0
409 Rogers View CourtRaleigh, NC 27610Ph: 919-250-9918
LOG OF BORING: MW-1
Page:1 of 1
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
1. Well Contractor Information:
James D. Barker
Well Contractor Name
3106A
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Quantex, Inc.
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit#:
Lisi all applicable well co1,stn,c1ion permits (I.e. Counry, State. Variance, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
OAgricultural OMunicipal!Public
OGcothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply) DResidential Water Supply (single)
Olndustrial/Commercial DResidential Water Supply (shared)
Olrrigation
Non-Water Supply Well:
li!IMonitoring DRecovery
Injection Well:
DAquifer Recharge OGroundwater Remediation
DAquifer Storage and Recovery OSalinity Barrier
DAquifer Test OStormv.-ater Drainage
DExperimental Technology OSubsidence Control
OGcothennal (Closed Loop) OT racer
OGcothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) OOther (explain under #21 Remarks)
8/4/16 MW-1 4. Date Well(s) Completed: Well ID#
Sa. Well Location: Glen Raven Mill (former) NA
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
800 Manning Street, Kinston, NC 28501
Physical Address, City, and Zip
Lenoir NA
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
Sb. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35.265058 77.591572
N w
6. Is (are) the well(s): w!Permanent or OTemporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: DY es or ~No
ff this is a repair,fill ou1 known well consm,aion information and explain rhe naiure afthe
repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
one of six
8. Number of wells constructed:-----------
For multiple injection or non-water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can
submil one form. 15' 9. Total well depth below land surface: ____________ (ft.)
For multiple wells list all deprhs if different (example-3@200' and 2@100')
NA
10. Static water level below top of casing: -----------(ft.) ff water level is above casing, use "+" 8"
11. Borehole ruameter: -----e----(in.)
Auger
12. Well construction method:-----------------
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
13a. Yield (gpm) ________ Method of test: _______ _
I For Internal Use ONLY:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO DESCRIPTION
6 ft. 7 ft, Tan/Brown Fine SAND
ft. ft,
15. OUTER CASING (for multi-casedivells) OR LINER(ifapplicable)
FROM 1'0 OIAME'J'ER I TIDCKNESS MATERIAL
0 ft. 5 ft, 2 in, Sch 40 PVC
16. INNER CASJNG OR TUBING (11cotbermal closed-loop)
FROM TO DIAMETER TffiCKNESS MATERIAL
ft. ft. in-
ft. ft. in..
17.SCREEN
FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE TlflCKNESS MATERJAL
5 ft. 15 ft. 2 in. 0.010 Sch 40 PVC
ft. ft. in.
IS.GROUT
FROM TO MATERIAL EM'PLACEMEN1' METHOD & AMOUNT
0 ft. 3 ft. neat cement 65 lbs. pour
3 ft. 4 ft. Bentonite 25 1bs. pour
ft. ft.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEi\fE!\'T METHOD
4 ft. 15 ft. #2 sand Pour
ft. ft.
20. DRILLING LOG (attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM 1'0 DESCRIPTION (color banlnes<-soil/rock nne •rain size etc.)
0 ft. 5 ft. Tan Silty SAND
5 ft. 10 ft. Tan/Brown Fine SAND
10 ft. 15 ft. Brown Fine to Medium SAND
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
2LREMARKS
22. Certificf on: V'), fl;!. 8/28/16 .... 11,L,,v)
Signarure of ertified Well Contractor Date
B si nin tj is orm I hereb certi that the well(s was were y g g Ji , 'Y ifj, ) ( y consrn,cted in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a
copy of this record has been provided ro tlte well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTUCT!ONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Quality, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a
above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Quality, Underground Injection Control Program,
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to
the address( es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
13b. Disinfection type: Amount: completion of well construction to the county health department of the county t...:=.====::...=:~::..:=======-....:.::==.:::..:========:...l where constructed.
FormGW-l North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality Revised Jan. 2013
Construction Details
COMMENTS:in - indicates inches N/A - indicates not applicable to this boring TVA - Toxic Vapor Analyzer
ft - indicates depth in feet ppm - indicates parts per million FID - Flame Ionization Detector
ft BLS - indicates feet below land surface DPT - Direct Push Technology PWR - Partially Weathered Rock
4
6
8
0'-3'
Grout 0' - 5'
Casing
Grout
ft

-
B
L
S
Organics mixed with Asphalt, Bricks, Rocks and unknown black material
Same as above with clay (CL) mixed in - slightly hydrated
Dark grey, clay sand (SC) - very hydrated
Dark grey, sand (SP) - very hydrated
2
24
18
20
16
1414
16
18
4'-15'
Sand Sand
22 22
409 Rogers View CourtRaleigh, NC 27610Ph: 919-250-9918
Quantex, Inc.Subcontractor/Drillers: Kinston, NC
Site Name:
Project Number:
10
2
4
6
8
10
20
12
3'-4'
Bentonite Bentonite
5'-15'
Screen
12
SOIL DESCRIPTION (color, texture, moisture, etc.)
24
Top of Casing Elev. (ft):
Date Started:8/4/2016
Date Completed:
Driller :
R2611.00 T4055 Macrocore
Location:
8/4/2016
Geoprobe DPT Total Boring Depth (ft):
Sampling Method:
Drilling/Boring Method:
Monitoring Equipment:
Former Glen Raven Mills
MW-2LOG OF BORING:
NA
ft
-
B
L
S
Latitude:
of
K. Johnson
Longitude:
Technician:NA
1
Quantex, Inc.
Page:1
NA
15.0
NA
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
1. Well Contractor Information:
James D. Barker
Well Contractor Name
3106A
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Quantex, Inc.
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit#:
Lisi all applicable well co1,stn,c1ion permits (I.e. Counry, State. Variance, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
OAgricultural OMunicipal!Public
OGcothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply) DResidential Water Supply (single)
Olndustrial/Commercial DResidential Water Supply (shared)
Olrrigation
Non-Water Supply Well:
li!IMonitoring DRecovery
Injection Well:
DAquifer Recharge OGroundwater Remediation
DAquifer Storage and Recovery OSalinity Barrier
DAquifer Test OStormv.-ater Drainage
DExperimental Technology OSubsidence Control
OGcothennal (Closed Loop) OT racer
OGcothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) OOther (explain under #21 Remarks)
8/4/16 MW-2 4. Date Well(s) Completed: Well ID#
Sa. Well Location: Glen Raven Mill (former) NA
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
800 Manning Street, Kinston, NC 28501
Physical Address, City, and Zip
Lenoir NA
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
Sb. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35.264500 77.591537
N w
6. Is (are) the well(s): w!Permanent or OTemporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: DY es or ~No
ff this is a repair,fill ou1 known well consm,aion information and explain rhe naiure afthe
repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
one of six
8. Number of wells constructed:-----------
For multiple injection or non-water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can
submil one form. 15' 9. Total well depth below land surface: ____________ (ft.)
For multiple wells list all deprhs if different (example-3@200' and 2@100')
NA
10. Static water level below top of casing: -----------(ft.) ff water level is above casing, use "+" 8"
11. Borehole ruameter: -----e----(in.)
Auger
12. Well construction method:-----------------
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
13a. Yield (gpm) ________ Method of test: _______ _
I For Internal Use ONLY:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO DESCRIPTION
6 ft. 7 ft, Tan/Brown Fine SAND
ft. ft,
15. OUTER CASING (for multi-casedivells) OR LINER(ifapplicable)
FROM 1'0 OIAME'J'ER I TIDCKNESS MATERIAL
0 ft. 5 ft, 2 in, Sch 40 PVC
16. INNER CASJNG OR TUBING (11cotbermal closed-loop)
FROM TO DIAMETER TffiCKNESS MATERIAL
ft. ft. in-
ft. ft. in..
17.SCREEN
FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE TlflCKNESS MATERJAL
5 ft. 15 ft. 2 in. 0.010 Sch 40 PVC
ft. ft. in.
IS.GROUT
FROM TO MATERIAL EM'PLACEMEN1' METHOD & AMOUNT
0 ft. 3 ft. neat cement 65 lbs. pour
3 ft. 4 ft. Bentonite 25 1bs. pour
ft. ft.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEi\fE!\'T METHOD
4 ft. 15 ft. #2 sand Pour
ft. ft.
20. DRILLING LOG (attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM 1'0 DESCRIPTION (color banlnes<-soil/rock nne •rain size etc.)
0 ft. 5 ft. Tan Silty SAND
5 ft. 10 ft. Tan/Brown Fine SAND
10 ft. 15 ft. Brown Fine to Medium SAND
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
2LREMARKS
22. Certificf on: V'), fl;!. 8/28/16 .... 11,L,,v)
Signarure of ertified Well Contractor Date
B si nin tj is orm I hereb certi that the well(s was were y g g Ji , 'Y ifj, ) ( y consrn,cted in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a
copy of this record has been provided ro tlte well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTUCT!ONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Quality, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a
above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Quality, Underground Injection Control Program,
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to
the address( es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
13b. Disinfection type: Amount: completion of well construction to the county health department of the county t...:=.====::...=:~::..:=======-....:.::==.:::..:========:...l where constructed.
FormGW-l North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality Revised Jan. 2013
Construction Details
COMMENTS:in - indicates inches N/A - indicates not applicable to this boring TVA - Toxic Vapor Analyzer
ft - indicates depth in feet ppm - indicates parts per million FID - Flame Ionization Detector
ft BLS - indicates feet below land surface DPT - Direct Push Technology PWR - Partially Weathered Rock
24 24
Organics and dark brown, clay sand (SC)
Light brown, clay sand (SC)
White, sand (SP) - evidence of water starting at 7'-8' BLS
16 16
18 18
20 20
22 22
6
8 8
10 10
12 12
14 14
3'-4'
Bentonite Bentonite4 4
4'-15'
Sand Sand5'-15'
Screen
6
ft

-
B
L
S
SOIL DESCRIPTION (color, texture, moisture, etc.)
ft
-
B
L
S
0'-3'
Grout 0' - 5'
Casing
Grout2 2
Date Completed:8/3/2016 Monitoring Equipment:NA Technician:K. Johnson
Date Started:8/3/2016 Driller :Quantex, Inc.Longitude:NA
Location: Kinston, NC Subcontractor/Drillers: Quantex, Inc.Latitude:NA
Project Number:R2611.00 T4055 Sampling Method:Macrocore Top of Casing Elev. (ft):NA
Site Name: Former Glen Raven Mills Drilling/Boring Method:Geoprobe DPT Total Boring Depth (ft):15.0
409 Rogers View CourtRaleigh, NC 27610Ph: 919-250-9918
LOG OF BORING: MW-3
Page:1 of 1
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
1. Well Contractor Information:
James D. Barker
Well Contractor Name
3106A
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Quantex, Inc.
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit#:
Lisi all applicable well co1,stn,c1ion permits (I.e. Counry, State. Variance, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
OAgricultural OMunicipal!Public
OGcothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply) DResidential Water Supply (single)
Olndustrial/Commercial DResidential Water Supply (shared)
Olrrigation
Non-Water Supply Well:
li!IMonitoring DRecovery
Injection Well:
DAquifer Recharge OGroundwater Remediation
DAquifer Storage and Recovery OSalinity Barrier
DAquifer Test OStormv.-ater Drainage
DExperimental Technology OSubsidence Control
OGcothennal (Closed Loop) OT racer
OGcothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) OOther(explain under#21 Remarks)
8/4/16 MW-3 4. Date Well(s) Completed: Well ID#
Sa. Well Location: Glen Raven Mill (former) NA
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
800 Manning Street, Kinston, NC 28501
Physical Address, City, and Zip
Lenoir NA
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
Sb. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35.265551 77.590673
N w
6. Is (are) the well(s): w!Permanent or OTemporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: DY es or ~No
ff this is a repair,fill ou1 known well consm,aion information and explain rhe nature afthe
repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
one of six
8. Number of wells constructed:-----------
For multiple injection or non-water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can
submi1 one form. 15' 9. Total well depth below land surface: ____________ (ft.)
For multiple wells list all deprhs if different (example-3@200' and 2@100')
NA
10. Static water level below top of casing: -----------(ft.) ff water level is above casing, use "+" 8"
11. Borehole ruameter: -----e----(in.)
Auger
12. Well construction method:-----------------
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
13a. Yield (gpm) ________ Method of test: _______ _
I For Internal Use ONLY:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO DESCRIPTION
6 ft. 7 ft, Tan/Brown Fine SAND
ft. ft,
15. OUTER CASING (for multi-casedivells) OR LINER(ifapplicable)
FROM 1'0 OIAME'J'ER I TIDCKNESS MATERIAL
0 ft. 5 ft, 2 in, Sch 40 PVC
16. INNER CASJNG OR TUBING (11cotbermal closed-loop)
FROM TO DIAMETER TffiCKNESS MATERIAL
ft. ft. in-
ft. ft. in..
17.SCREEN
FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE TlflCKNESS MATERJAL
5 ft. 15 ft. 2 in. 0.010 Sch 40 PVC
ft. ft. in.
IS.GROUT
FROM TO MATERIAL EM'PLACEMEN1' METHOD & AMOUNT
0 ft. 3 ft. neat cement 65 lbs. pour
3 ft. 4 ft. Bentonite 25 1bs. pour
ft. ft.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEi\fE!\'T METHOD
4 ft. 15 ft. #2 sand Pour
ft. ft.
20. DRILLING LOG (attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM 1'0 DESCRIPTION (color banlnes<-soil/rock nne •rain size etc.)
0 ft. 5 ft. Tan Silty SAND
5 ft. 10 ft. Tan/Brown Fine SAND
10 ft. 15 ft. Brown Fine to Medium SAND
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
2LREMARKS
22. Certificf on: V'), fl;!. 8/28/16 .... 11,L,,v)
Signarure of ertified Well Contractor Date
B si nin tj is orm I hereb certi that the well(s was were y g g Ji , 'Y ifj, ) ( y consrn,cted in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a
copy of this record has been provided ro tlte well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTUCT!ONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Quality, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a
above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Quality, Underground Injection Control Program,
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to
the address( es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
13b. Disinfection type: Amount: completion of well construction to the county health department of the county t...:=.====::...=:~::..:=======-....:.::==.:::..:========:...l where constructed.
FormGW-l North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality Revised Jan. 2013
Construction Details
COMMENTS:in - indicates inches N/A - indicates not applicable to this boring TVA - Toxic Vapor Analyzer
ft - indicates depth in feet ppm - indicates parts per million FID - Flame Ionization Detector
ft BLS - indicates feet below land surface DPT - Direct Push Technology PWR - Partially Weathered Rock
24 24
Organics (1') and Assorted Debris (bricks, rocks, clay, soil)
Dark grey, silty sand (SM)
Light tan, sand (SP) - hydrated at 6' BLS
Dark grey, clay sand (SC)
16 16
18 18
20 20
22 22
6
8 8
10 10
12 12
14 14
3'-4'
Bentonite Bentonite4 4
4'-15'
Sand Sand5'-15'
Screen
6
ft

-
B
L
S
SOIL DESCRIPTION (color, texture, moisture, etc.)
ft
-
B
L
S
0'-3'
Grout 0' - 5'
Casing
Grout2 2
Date Completed:8/3/2016 Monitoring Equipment:NA Technician:K. Johnson
Date Started:8/3/2016 Driller :Quantex, Inc.Longitude:NA
Location: Kinston, NC Subcontractor/Drillers: Quantex, Inc.Latitude:NA
Project Number:R2611.00 T4055 Sampling Method:Macrocore Top of Casing Elev. (ft):NA
Site Name: Former Glen Raven Mills Drilling/Boring Method:Geoprobe DPT Total Boring Depth (ft):15.0
409 Rogers View CourtRaleigh, NC 27610Ph: 919-250-9918
LOG OF BORING: MW-4
Page:1 of 1
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
1. Well Contractor Information:
James D. Barker
Well Contractor Name
3106A
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Quantex, Inc.
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit#:
Lisi all applicable well co1,stn,c1ion permits (I.e. Counry, State. Variance, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
OAgricultural OMunicipal!Public
OGcothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply) DResidential Water Supply (single)
Olndustrial/Commercial DResidential Water Supply (shared)
Olrrigation
Non-Water Supply Well:
li!IMonitoring DRecovery
Injection Well:
DAquifer Recharge OGroundwater Remediation
DAquifer Storage and Recovery OSalinity Barrier
DAquifer Test OStormv.-ater Drainage
DExperimental Technology OSubsidence Control
OGcothennal (Closed Loop) OT racer
OGcothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) OOther (explain under #21 Remarks)
8/4/16 MW-4 4. Date Well(s) Completed: Well ID#
Sa. Well Location: Glen Raven Mill (former) NA
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
800 Manning Street, Kinston, NC 28501
Physical Address, City, and Zip
Lenoir NA
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
Sb. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35.264393 77.590585
N w
6. Is (are) the well(s): !iii Permanent or OTemporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: DY es or ~No
ff this is a repair,fill ou1 known well consm,aion information and explain rhe naiure afthe
repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
one of six
8. Number of wells constructed:-----------
For multiple injection or non-water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can
submil one form. 15' 9. Total well depth below land surface: ____________ (ft.)
For multiple wells list all deprhs if different (example-3@200' and 2@100')
NA
10. Static water level below top of casing: -----------(ft.) ff water level is above casing, use "+" 8"
11. Borehole ruameter: -----e----(in.)
Auger
12. Well construction method:-----------------
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
13a. Yield (gpm) ________ Method of test: _______ _
I For Internal Use ONLY:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO DESCRIPTION
6 ft. 7 ft, Tan/Brown Fine SAND
ft. ft,
15. OUTER CASING (for multi-casedivells) OR LINER(ifapplicable)
FROM 1'0 OIAME'J'ER I TIDCKNESS MATERIAL
0 ft. 5 ft, 2 in, Sch 40 PVC
16. INNER CASJNG OR TUBING (11cotbermal closed-loop)
FROM TO DIAMETER TffiCKNESS MATERIAL
ft. ft. in-
ft. ft. in..
17.SCREEN
FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE TlflCKNESS MATERJAL
5 ft. 15 ft. 2 in. 0.010 Sch 40 PVC
ft. ft. in.
IS.GROUT
FROM TO MATERIAL EM'PLACEMEN1' METHOD & AMOUNT
0 ft. 3 ft. neat cement 65 lbs. pour
3 ft. 4 ft. Bentonite 25 1bs. pour
ft. ft.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEi\fE!\'T METHOD
4 ft. 15 ft. #2 sand Pour
ft. ft.
20. DRILLING LOG (attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM 1'0 DESCRIPTION (color banlnes<-soil/rock nne •rain size etc.)
0 ft. 5 ft. Tan Silty SAND
5 ft. 10 ft. Tan/Brown Fine SAND
10 ft. 15 ft. Brown Fine to Medium SAND
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
2LREMARKS
22. Certificf on: V'), fl;!. 8/28/16 .... 11,L,,v)
Signarure of ertified Well Contractor Date
B si nin tj is orm I hereb certi that the well(s was were y g g Ji , 'Y ifj, ) ( y consrn,cted in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a
copy of this record has been provided ro tlte well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTUCT!ONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Quality, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a
above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Quality, Underground Injection Control Program,
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to
the address( es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
13b. Disinfection type: Amount: completion of well construction to the county health department of the county t...:=.====::...=:~::..:=======-....:.::==.:::..:========:...l where constructed.
FormGW-l North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality Revised Jan. 2013
Construction Details
COMMENTS:in - indicates inches N/A - indicates not applicable to this boring TVA - Toxic Vapor Analyzer
ft - indicates depth in feet ppm - indicates parts per million FID - Flame Ionization Detector
ft BLS - indicates feet below land surface DPT - Direct Push Technology PWR - Partially Weathered Rock
24 24
Orange and grey, clay (CL)
White, sand (SP) with orange hue - hydrated at 9' BLS
Dark grey, sand (SP)
Dark grey, silty clay (ML)
16 16
18 18
20 20
22 22
6
8 8
10 10
12 12
14 14
3'-4'
Bentonite Bentonite4 4
White, sand (SP) with pieces of clay (CL) mixed in
4'-15'
Sand Sand5'-15'
Screen
6
ft

-
B
L
S
SOIL DESCRIPTION (color, texture, moisture, etc.)
ft
-
B
L
S
Asphalt and Organics
0'-3'
Grout 0' - 5'
Casing
Grout2 2
Date Completed:8/3/2016 Monitoring Equipment:NA Technician:K. Johnson
Date Started:8/3/2016 Driller :Quantex, Inc.Longitude:NA
Location: Kinston, NC Subcontractor/Drillers: Quantex, Inc.Latitude:NA
Project Number:R2611.00 T4055 Sampling Method:Macrocore Top of Casing Elev. (ft):NA
Site Name: Former Glen Raven Mills Drilling/Boring Method:Geoprobe DPT Total Boring Depth (ft):15.0
409 Rogers View CourtRaleigh, NC 27610Ph: 919-250-9918
LOG OF BORING: MW-5
Page:1 of 1
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
1. Well Contractor Information:
James D. Barker
Well Contractor Name
3106A
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Quantex, Inc.
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit#:
Lisi all applicable well co1,stn,c1ion permits (I.e. Counry, State. Variance, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
OAgricultural OMunicipal!Public
OGcothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply) DResidential Water Supply (single)
Olndustrial/Commercial DResidential Water Supply (shared)
Olrrigation
Non-Water Supply Well:
li!IMonitoring DRecovery
Injection Well:
DAquifer Recharge OGroundwater Remediation
DAquifer Storage and Recovery OSalinity Barrier
DAquifer Test OStormv.-ater Drainage
DExperimental Technology OSubsidence Control
OGcothennal (Closed Loop) OT racer
OGcothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) OOther (explain under #21 Remarks)
8/4/16 MW-5 4. Date Well(s) Completed: Well ID#
Sa. Well Location: Glen Raven Mill (former) NA
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
800 Manning Street, Kinston, NC 28501
Physical Address, City, and Zip
Lenoir NA
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
Sb. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35.265124 77.589310
N w
6. Is (are) the well(s): litlPermanent or OTemporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: DY es or ~No
ff this is a repair,fill ou1 known well consm,aion information and explain rhe naiure afthe
repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
one of six
8. Number of wells constructed:-----------
For multiple injection or non-water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can
submil one form. 15' 9. Total well depth below land surface: ____________ (ft.)
For multiple wells list all deprhs if different (example-3@200' and 2@100')
NA
10. Static water level below top of casing: -----------(ft.) ff water level is above casing, use "+" 8"
11. Borehole ruameter: -----e----(in.)
Auger
12. Well construction method:-----------------
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
13a. Yield (gpm) ________ Method of test: _______ _
I For Internal Use ONLY:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO DESCRIPTION
6 ft. 7 ft, Tan/Brown Fine SAND
ft. ft,
15. OUTER CASING (for multi-casedivells) OR LINER(ifapplicable)
FROM 1'0 OIAME'J'ER I TIDCKNESS MATERIAL
0 ft. 5 ft, 2 in, Sch 40 PVC
16. INNER CASJNG OR TUBING (11cotbermal closed-loop)
FROM TO DIAMETER TffiCKNESS MATERIAL
ft. ft. in-
ft. ft. in..
17.SCREEN
FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE TlflCKNESS MATERJAL
5 ft. 15 ft. 2 in. 0.010 Sch 40 PVC
ft. ft. in.
IS.GROUT
FROM TO MATERIAL EM'PLACEMEN1' METHOD & AMOUNT
0 ft. 3 ft. neat cement 65 lbs. pour
3 ft. 4 ft. Bentonite 25 1bs. pour
ft. ft.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEi\fE!\'T METHOD
4 ft. 15 ft. #2 sand Pour
ft. ft.
20. DRILLING LOG (attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM 1'0 DESCRIPTION (color banlnes<-soil/rock nne •rain size etc.)
0 ft. 5 ft. Tan Silty SAND
5 ft. 10 ft. Tan/Brown Fine SAND
10 ft. 15 ft. Brown Fine to Medium SAND
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
2LREMARKS
22. Certificf on: V'), fl;!. 8/28/16 .... 11,L,,v)
Signarure of ertified Well Contractor Date
B si nin tj is orm I hereb certi that the well(s was were y g g Ji , 'Y ifj, ) ( y consrn,cted in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a
copy of this record has been provided ro tlte well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTUCT!ONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Quality, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a
above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Quality, Underground Injection Control Program,
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to
the address( es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
13b. Disinfection type: Amount: completion of well construction to the county health department of the county t...:=.====::...=:~::..:=======-....:.::==.:::..:========:...l where constructed.
FormGW-l North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality Revised Jan. 2013
Construction Details
COMMENTS:in - indicates inches N/A - indicates not applicable to this boring TVA - Toxic Vapor Analyzer
ft - indicates depth in feet ppm - indicates parts per million FID - Flame Ionization Detector
ft BLS - indicates feet below land surface DPT - Direct Push Technology PWR - Partially Weathered Rock
24 24
Orange, dense/compacted, silty clay (ML)
White sand (SP) - slightly hydrated at 9' BLS, very hydrated at 11' BLS
Dark grey, dense/compacted, sand (SP)
Same as above with some clay mixed in (SC)
16 16
18 18
20 20
22 22
6
8 8
10 10
12 12
14 14
3'-4'
Bentonite Bentonite4 4
4'-15'
Sand Sand5'-15'
Screen
6
ft

-
B
L
S
SOIL DESCRIPTION (color, texture, moisture, etc.)
ft
-
B
L
S
Organics
0'-3'
Grout 0' - 5'
Casing
Grout2 2
Date Completed:8/3/2016 Monitoring Equipment:NA Technician:K. Johnson
Date Started:8/3/2016 Driller :Quantex, Inc.Longitude:NA
Location: Kinston, NC Subcontractor/Drillers: Quantex, Inc.Latitude:NA
Project Number:R2611.00 T4055 Sampling Method:Macrocore Top of Casing Elev. (ft):NA
Site Name: Former Glen Raven Mills Drilling/Boring Method:Geoprobe DPT Total Boring Depth (ft):15.0
409 Rogers View CourtRaleigh, NC 27610Ph: 919-250-9918
LOG OF BORING: MW-6
Page:1 of 1
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
1. Well Contractor Information:
James D. Barker
Well Contractor Name
3106A
NC Well Contractor Certification Number
Quantex, Inc.
Company Name
2. Well Construction Permit#:
Lisi all applicable well co1,stn,c1ion permits (I.e. Counry, State. Variance, etc.)
3. Well Use (check well use):
Water Supply Well:
OAgricultural OMunicipal!Public
OGcothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply) DResidential Water Supply (single)
Olndustrial/Commercial DResidential Water Supply (shared)
Olrrigation
Non-Water Supply Well:
li!IMonitoring DRecovery
Injection Well:
DAquifer Recharge OGroundwater Remediation
DAquifer Storage and Recovery OSalinity Barrier
DAquifer Test OStormv.-ater Drainage
DExperimental Technology OSubsidence Control
OGcothennal (Closed Loop) OT racer
OGcothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) OOther (explain under #21 Remarks)
8/4/16 MW-6 4. Date Well(s) Completed: Well ID#
Sa. Well Location: Glen Raven Mill (former) NA
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)
800 Manning Street, Kinston, NC 28501
Physical Address, City, and Zip
Lenoir NA
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN)
Sb. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(if well field, one lat/long is sufficient)
35.264325 77.589539
N w
6. Is (are) the well(s): lii!Permanent or OTemporary
7. Is this a repair to an existing well: DY es or ~No
ff this is a repair,fill ou1 known well consm,aion information and explain rhe naiure afthe
repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
one of six
8. Number of wells constructed:-----------
For multiple injection or non-water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can
submil one form. 15' 9. Total well depth below land surface: ____________ (ft.)
For multiple wells list all deprhs if different (example-3@200' and 2@100')
NA
10. Static water level below top of casing: -----------(ft.) ff water level is above casing, use "+" 8"
11. Borehole ruameter: -----e----(in.)
Auger
12. Well construction method:-----------------
(i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.)
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
13a. Yield (gpm) ________ Method of test: _______ _
I For Internal Use ONLY:
14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO DESCRIPTION
6 ft. 7 ft, Tan/Brown Fine SAND
ft. ft,
15. OUTER CASING (for multi-casedivells) OR LINER(ifapplicable)
FROM 1'0 OIAME'J'ER I TIDCKNESS MATERIAL
0 ft. 5 ft, 2 in, Sch 40 PVC
16. INNER CASJNG OR TUBING (11cotbermal closed-loop)
FROM TO DIAMETER TffiCKNESS MATERIAL
ft. ft. in-
ft. ft. in..
17.SCREEN
FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE TlflCKNESS MATERJAL
5 ft. 15 ft. 2 in. 0.010 Sch 40 PVC
ft. ft. in.
IS.GROUT
FROM TO MATERIAL EM'PLACEMEN1' METHOD & AMOUNT
0 ft. 3 ft. neat cement 65 lbs. pour
3 ft. 4 ft. Bentonite 25 1bs. pour
ft. ft.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEi\fE!\'T METHOD
4 ft. 15 ft. #2 sand Pour
ft. ft.
20. DRILLING LOG (attach additional sheets if necessary)
FROM 1'0 DESCRIPTION (color banlnes<-soil/rock nne •rain size etc.)
0 ft. 5 ft. Tan Silty SAND
5 ft. 10 ft. Tan/Brown Fine SAND
10 ft. 15 ft. Brown Fine to Medium SAND
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
2LREMARKS
22. Certificf on: V'), fl;!. 8/28/16 .... 11,L,,v)
Signarure of ertified Well Contractor Date
B si nin tj is orm I hereb certi that the well(s was were y g g Ji , 'Y ifj, ) ( y consrn,cted in accordance
with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a
copy of this record has been provided ro tlte well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details:
You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
SUBMITTAL INSTUCT!ONS
24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Quality, Information Processing Unit,
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a
above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
construction to the following:
Division of Water Quality, Underground Injection Control Program,
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to
the address( es) above, also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
13b. Disinfection type: Amount: completion of well construction to the county health department of the county t...:=.====::...=:~::..:=======-....:.::==.:::..:========:...l where constructed.
FormGW-l North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality Revised Jan. 2013

APPENDIX B

GROUNDWATER MONITORING FIELD
RECORDS
JOB NO.: R2611.00 T4055
Well I.D.MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 MW-6
Well Casing Inside Diameter (in.)2''2''2''2''2''2''
Total Well Depth (ft.)15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0
Water Depth: Marker Reading (ft.)8.38 8.25 5.51 13.09 8.36 8.87
Tape Reading (+ or =)
Water Depth ( Marker = Tape)
Water Column (Total Depth - Water Depth)6.62 6.75 9.49 1.91 6.64 6.13
Well Volume (see Note)1.06 1.08 1.52 0.31 1.06 0.98
Volume To Purge (3 to 5 well volumes)3.18 3.24 4.56 0.92 3.19 2.94
Bail Time
Volume Purged (Note if well went dry)4 gal 5 gal 6 gal dry 2 gal 4 gal 5 gal
Sample I.D.MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 MW-6
Date 8/4/2016 8/4/2016 8/4/2016 8/4/2016 8/4/2016 8/4/2016
Time 18:20 16:00 15:30 16:45 15:15 17:30
Parameters 8260 & 8270 8260 & 8270 8260 & 8270 8260 & 8270 8260 & 8270 8260 & 8270
NTU 1st Volume 18.9 59.3 528 14.8 54.7 22.3
2nd Volume 12.7 62.9 154 56.5 45.6 14.2
3rd Volume 12.4 45.5 52.9 50.7 13.9
Conductivity (Units = uS/cm) 1st Volume 0.167 0.126 0.136 0.292 0.095 0.196
2nd Volume 0.159 0.127 0.111 0.277 0.093 0.199
3rd Volume 0.162 0.128 0.114 0.090 0.198
D.O. (mg/L) 1st Volume 4.49 1.95 3.29 8.43 2.32 4.31
2nd Volume 4.66 2.21 3.50 7.85 2.33 4.40
3rd Volume 4.68 2.25 3.46 2.31 4.44
pH 1st Volume 6.61 6.82 6.44 7.66 6.20 6.56
2nd Volume 6.60 6.77 6.68 7.59 6.19 6.53
3rd Volume 6.60 6.86 6.67 6.18 6.53
Note: Volumes per foot of water column: 2" well - 0.16 gal/ft, 6" well - 1.5 gal/ft.
SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME: FORMER GLEN RAVEN MILL
GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM DATA MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING DATA
DATE(S): 8/4/16 SAMPLER'S SIGNATURE:
REMARKS:

APPENDIX C

A&D ENVIRONMENTAL, FIELD ANALYSIS REPORT SHEET (8/4/2016);
DRUM PROFILES FOR TRANSPORT; AND BILLS OF LADING/MATERIAL MANIFESTS

Chemist: Kevin Young Date:Location:
Sample #Description Volume Size Type Container Desciption pH Ox Flash Water Sol Water Rx Cyanide Sulfide Peroxide Radioact.
1
Gelled yellow Resin like material(on Floor leak
from drum)1/4 55 1A1 Poor, leaking, need OP 7 No No Non-Sol No N/A N/A N/A No
2
Green Dye - Versatint Supra Green (Malliken
Chemical 3/4 55 1H1 Need Bung, but ok 7 No No Soluble No N/A N/A N/A No
3
Amber Liquid Slick like oil, Emulsifies (strings)
on contact with water (Floc)1/2 55 1A2 possible leak; need OP
3 w/ H2O, 5
w/o water No No Non-Sol No N/A N/A N/A No
4 Versatint Supra Blue 1/4 55 1H1 ok- need corse bung
5
Lenox Chemical Lubricant Amber Med Visc
Liquid 1/2 55 1H1 OK 7 No No Non-Sol No N/A N/A N/A No
6 Versatint Supra Brown <1/2 55 1H1 Ok
7 Versatint Supra Orange 3/4 55 1H1 OK
8 Versatint Supra Brown <1/2 55 1H1 Ok
9 Versatint Supra Brown <1/2 55 1H1 Ok
10
Amber Clear Liquid Low Visc Strings on
contact with water (Floc)Full 55 1H1 (Discolored, OP or Trans)7 No No Non-Sol No N/A N/A N/A No
FIELD ANALYSIS REPORT SHEET
8/4/2016 Glen Raven Mills; 800 Manning Street; Kinston, NC
A&D Environmental Services, Inc.
2718 Uwharrie Rd., Archdale, NC 27263
336-434-7750 FAX: [phone]
Reserved for Facility Use Approval Date: By: yr rom
_____ Expiration Date: Approval Date
D Solidification D Recovery Profile Number:
A. Billing Information
Company Mid-Atlantic Associates Account#
Address 409 Rogers View Court
City/State Raleigh, NC Zip 2761 O Contact Kelly Johnson
Phone [phone] Fax
B. Generator Information/Location of Waste
Generator Name Former Glen Raven Mill Site Contact
Address 800 Manning Street -~~~~~~~~~~~...:.:;:...:.:;;==.cc,__::::..::.::.:_~~~~~~~~~~~-
C it y /St ate Kinston, NC
Contact Phone
Type of Business
C. Waste Description
Common Name of Waste
Process Generating Waste
D. Physical Properties
WW Treatment Resin (Flocculant)
Unused out of date material
Zip
EPAID NCCESQG
SIC Code
Physical State Odor Color Viscosity Specific Gravity 0 [_:,_] 20 % Solid None Describe: D Low
[_:,_] 80 o/o Liquid D Mild Clear-Amber 0 Medium 9-10 lb/gallon 0 Sludge D Strong D High
80 o/o Free Liquid Describe:
Flash Point pH Water
D <73 F 0 140-199 F D <2 [J 9.1 -12.4 D < s01o D 30-80%
D 73-99 F 0 >199 F D 2.1 -4.9 D , 12.5 D 5-10% D 80-100%
D 100-139 F ON/A 0 5-9 D N/A D 10-30% [] N/A
Is this waste incompatibile with other material? 0 No D Yes If Yes, explain:
E. Volume
Anticipated Volume: 2x85; 1x55 0 Drums D 5-Gal/on D 30-Gallon D 55-Gal/on D Tote
D Bulk D Tanker D Pump Truck D other:
Estimated Frequency: D Weekly D Semimonthly D Monthly D Quarterly 0 Other OT
F. Constituents G. Other Hazards
Total must be equal to 100% All constituents, including debris must be identified D Radioactive
Constituents Actual o/o Range D Water Reactive
Flocculant Resin (some Gelled) 100% 100 D Oxidizer
D OSHA
D Carclnogen
D Explosive
D Pesticide
D Polymerizable
D Organic Peroxide
D Infectious
D Pryophoric
H. Process Flow Chart
Using the space provided, draw a flow chart showing how waste is generated
I. Constituents
These values are based on [7J Generator Knowledge D Analytical Results D MSDS
All anal~_ical data g_rovided relevant to this e.rofile must be conducted bJ!: laboratories that have NELAPINELAC accreditation.
Accreditation Number: Name:
Address: Phone:
inorganic
Metals Level (mg/!) Other Cone. Pesticides/Herbicides level (mg/I) 0004 Arsenic 5.0 <5. Ammonia ,la 0012 Endrin ,ra 0005 Barium 100.0 <llmlr Phosphorus ----,ra-0013 Lindane ----,ra-0006 Cadmium 1.0 ----zero Formaldehyde ----,ra-0014 Methoxych!or ----,ra-0007 Chromium 5.0 <Tu Total Solids ----,ra-0015 Toxaphene ----,ra-0008 Lead 5.0 <Tu PCBs ----,ra-0016 2.4-D ----,ra-0009 Mercury 0.2 ~ Copper ----,ra-0017 2,4,5-TP ----,ra-0010 Selenium 1.0 ---zn, Nickel ----,ra-0020 Chlordane ----,ra-0011 Silver 5.0 <Tu Zinc -ni'a" 0031 Heptachlor ----,ra----------
urgamc
Volatile Compounds Level (mg/!) Semi-Volatile Compounds Leve! (mg/I) 0018 Benzene 0.5 < 0.5 0023 o-Cresol 200.0 < 200.0 0019 Carbon Tetrachloride 0.5 --zm;-0024 m-Cresol 200.0 =ir 0021 Chlorobenzene 100.0 <llmlr 0025 p-Cresol 200.0 =ir 0022 Chloroform 6.0 <"ITT, 0026 Cresol 200.0 =ir 0028 1,2-0ichloroethane 0.5 --zm;-0027 1.4-0ichlorobenzene 7.5 ----zn-0029 1, 1-Dichloroethylene 0.7 ~ 0030 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.13 ~ 0035 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 200.0 =ir 0032 Hexchlorobenzene 0.13 ~ 0039 Tetrachloroethylene 07 ~ 0033 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.5 --zm;-0040 Trichloroethlene 0.5 --zm;-0034 Hexachloroethane 3.0 <To 0043 Vinyl Chloride 0.2 ----zny-0036 Nitrolbenzene 2.0 <To ---0037 Pentachlorophenol 100.0 <llmlr
0038 Pyridine 5.0 <Tu
0041 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 400.0 «rllITTf
0042 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2.0 <To ---
J. General Information
1 [7J No D Yes Is this waste a hazardous material as defined in 49 CFR Section 172.101?
If yes, include shipping name, placard hazard class and packaging group·
2 0 No DYes Is this waste regulated as a reportable quantity as defined in 49 CFR Section 172.101 Appendix A?
3 0 No DYes Is this waste a marine pollutant as defined in 49 CFR Section 172.101 Appendix B?
4 0 No DYes Is this hazardous waste, as determined by performing the Hazardos Waste Determination prescribed
al CFR262.11? {Attach Documentation)
5 [7] No DYes Does this waste contain any amount of Listed Hazardous Waste in 40 CFR 261.31, Hazardous Waste from
Non-specific Sources; 261.32, Hazardous Waste from Specific Sources; and 261.33, Discarded Commercial
6 0 No DYes
Chemical Products, Off specification Species, Container Residues, and Spill Residues?
Does waste fail any of the four Hazardous Waste Characteristics of ignitibility, corrosivity, reactivity, and
toxicity, as defined in 40 CFR 261.21, 261.22, 261.23, 261.23, respectively?
7 0 No DYes Is this waste state regulated? If Yes, defme·
B 0 No DYes Are Material Safety Data Sheets and/or all analytical data relevant to this profile data sheet attached?
9 0 No DYes Is this waste derived from an Investigation of an Undergroud Storage Tank release (!OW)?
K. Sample
Has a sample been included? D Yes [7J No If yes, sampled by: Date:
L. Generator's Certification
l hereby certify that all information submitted in this and attached documents is correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that
any samples submitted are representative of the actual waste. If A&D Environmental Services discovers a descrepancy during
the approval process. Generator grants A&O Environmental Services the authority to amend the profile, as A&O Environmental
Services LLC deems necessary, to reflect the descrepancy
Generator Signature Print Name Date l/i ,/ /,/:' .d< ,//::,{, .! , /r /, Li,.1/(:' /!'·;~, ·,IL
A&D Environmental Services, Inc.
2718 Uwharrie Rd., Archdale, NC 27263
336-434-7750 FAX: [phone]
Reserved for Facility Use Approval Date: By: yr rom
_____ Expiration Date: Approval Date
D Solidification D Recovery Profile Number:
A. Billing Information
Company
Address
City/State
Mid-Atlantic Associates Account#
409 Rogers View Court
Raleigh, NC Zip 27610 Contact
Phone [phone] Fax
B. Generator Information/Location of Waste
Generator Name
Address
City/State
Contact Phone
Type of Business
C. Waste Description
Common Name of Waste
Process Generating Waste
D. Physical Properties
Physical State
0 1 % Solid
Former Glen Raven Mill Site Contact
800 Manning Street
Kinston, NC Zip
EPAID
Versatint Supra Dye
Unused out of date material
Odor Color Viscosity
0 None Describe: 0 Low
Kelly Johnson
NCCESQG
SIC Code
Specific Gravity
0 99 % Liquid D Mild Varies D Medium 8-9 lb/gallon D Sludge D Strong
99 % Free Liquid Describe:
Flash Point
D <73 F 0 140-199 F
[J 73-99 F 0 >199 F
D 100-139 F DN/A
pH
D <2 09.1-12.4
D 2.1 -4.9 D > 12.5
0 5-9 D N/A
D High
Water
D < s01o
D 5-10%
D 10-30%
[71 30-80%
D 80-100%
D N/A
Is this waste incompatibile with other material? 0 No D Yes If Yes, explain:
E. Volume
Anticipated Volume: 2x85; 1x55 Q Drums D 5-Gallon D 30-Gallon D 55-Gallon D Tote
D Bulk D Tanker D Pump Truck D Other:
Estimated Frequency: D Weekly D Semimonthly D Monthly D Quarterly D Other OT
F. Constituents G. Other Hazards
Total must be equal to 100% All constituents, including debris must be identified D Radioactive
Constituents Actual 0/o Range D Water Reactive
Various Color dyes 40°/o 30-60 D Oxidizer
Water 60o/o 40-70 D OSHA
D Carcinogen
D Explosive
D Pesticide
D Polymerizable
D Organic Peroxide
D Infectious
[] Pryophoric
H. Process Flow Chart
Using the space provided, draw a flow chart showing how waste is generated
I. Constituents
These values are based on D Generator Knowledge [] Analytical Results [7] MSDS
All anal~ica/ data fl.tovided relevant to this g_rofile must be conducted bl:'.'. laboratories that have NELAP!NELAC accreditation.
Accreditation Number: Name:
Address: Phone:
Inorganic
Metals Level (mg/I) Other Cone. Pesticides/Herbicides Level (mg/I) 0004 Arsenic 5.0 <5 Ammonia n/a 0012 Endrin n/a 0005 Barium 100.0 <ffiflr Phosphorus --;ra-0013 Lindane --;ra-0006 Cadmium 1.0 <To Formaldehyde --;ra-0014 Methoxychlor --;ra-0007 Chromium 5.0 ~ Total Solids --;ra-0015 Toxaphene --;ra-0008 lead 50 ~ PCBs --;ra-0016 2.4-0 --;ra-0009 Mercury 0.2 <lf2 Copper --;ra-0017 2,4,5-TP --;ra-0010 Selenium 1.0 <To Nickel --;ra-0020 Chlordane --;ra-0011 Silver 5.0 ~ Zinc --;ra-0031 Heptachlor --;ra----------
Organic
Volatile Compounds Level (mg/I) Semi-Volatile Compounds Level (mg/!) 0018 Benzene 0.5 < 0.5 0023 o~Cresol 200.0 < 200,0 0019 Carbon Tetrachloride 0.5 ---zir, 0024 m-Cresol 200.0 ~ 0021 Chlorobenzene 100.0 <ffiflr 0025 p-Cresol 200.0 ~ 0022 Chloroform 6.0 ---zITTr 0026 Cresol 200.0 ~ 0028 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 ---zir, 0027 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 7.5 -zn-0029 1, 1-Dichloroethylene 0.7 '1l"T 0030 2.4~Dinitrotoluene 0.13 <11:IT 0035 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 200.0 ~ 0032 Hexchlorobenzene 0.13 <11:IT 0039 Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 '1l"T 0033 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.5 ---zir, 0040 Trich!oroethlene 0.5 ---zir, 0034 Hexachloroethane 3.0 <"Tir 0043 Vinyl Chloride 0.2 <lf2 0036 Nitrolbenzene 2.0 ~ ---0037 Pentachloropheno! 100.0 <ffiflr
0038 Pyridine 5.0 ~
0041 2,4 ,5-Trichloropheno! 400.0 <4UUlJ"
0042 2,4 ,6-Trichloropheno! 2.0 ~ ---
J. General Information
1 [7] No Dves Is this waste a hazardous material as defined in 49 CFR Section 172.101?
If yes, include shipping name, placard hazard class and packaging group
2 0No Dve5 Is this waste regulated as a reportable quantity as defined in 49 CFR Section 172.101 Appendix A?
3 [7] No Dves Is this waste a marine pollutant as defined in 49 CfR Section 172.101 Appendix B?
4 [7] No Dve5 Is this hazardous waste, as determined by performing the Hazardos Waste Determination prescribed
atCFR262.11? {Attach Documentation)
5 [7] No Dves Does this waste contain any amount of Listed Hazardous Waste in 40 CFR 261.31, Hazardous waste from
Non-specific Sources; 261.32, Hazardous Waste from Specific Sources: and 261.33, Discarded Commercial
6 [7] No Dves
Chemical Products. Off specification Species, Container Residues, and Spill Residues?
Does waste fail any of the four Hazardous Waste Characteristics of ignitibility, corrosivity, reactivity, and
toxicity, as defined in 40 CFR 261.21, 261.22, 261.23, 261.23, respectively?
7 [7] No Dves Is this waste state regulated? lf Yes, define:
B [7] No Dves Are Material Safety Data Sheets and/or all analytical data relevant to this profile data sheet attached?
9 [7] No Dves Is this waste derived from an Investigation of an Undergroud Storage Tank release {IDW)?
K. Sample
Has a sample been included? D Yes [7] No lfyes, sampled by: Date:
L. Generator's Certification
I hereby certify that all information submitted in this and attached documents is correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that
any samples submitted are representative of the actual waste. If A&D Environmental Services discovers a descrepancy during
the approval process, Generator grants A&D Environmental Services the authority to amend the profile, as A&O Environmental
Services LLC deems necessary, to reflect the descrepancy.
Generat_9r S)gnature Print Name Date
/_'_ / . / .. /:Iii /., ·ftt!; rf //L .. I / ./' ;(}~.(' !X rl, /\) '//( ,I Il "~J#>t.·L " l,,/1,,·' ~:-,.
'-,...,,.,·"
A&D Environmental Services, Inc.
2718 Uwharrie Rd., Archdale, NC 27263
336-434-7750 FAX: [phone]
Reserved for Facility Use Approval Date: By: yr rom
_____ Expiration Date: Approval Date
D Solidification D Recovery Profile Number:
A. Billing Information
Company Mid-Atlantic Associates Account#
Address 409 Rogers View Court
City/State Raleigh, NC Zip 27610 Contact Kelly Johnson
Phone [phone] Fax
B. Generator Information/Location of Waste
Generator Name Former Glen Raven Mill Site Contact
Address 800 Manning Street -------------=-=:...:.:.:::::=::.:;,_::::.::.:::_ ___________ _
City/State Kinston, NC
Contact Phone
Type of Business
C. Waste Description
Common Name of Waste
Process Generating Waste
D. Physical Properties
Physical State
[7] 1 % Solid
Lubricating Oil
Unused out of date material
Odor Color
Describe:
EPAID
Zip
Viscosity
[7J Low
NCCESQG
SIC Code
Specific Gravity
[_7J 99 % Liquid
D Sludge
[7J None
D Mild
D Strong
Amber D Medium
D High
8-9 lb/gallon
99 o/o Free Liquid Describe:
Flash Point
0 <73F
0 73-99 F
0 100-139 F
0 140-199 F
B>199F
DNIA
pH
D <2
D 2.1 -4.9
[_7J 5-9
D 9.1 -12.4
D > 12.5
D NIA
Water
D < so;o
D 5.10%
D 10-30%
Is this waste incompatibile with other material? [!] No D Yes If Yes, explain:
E. Volume
D 30-80%
D 80-100%
[_7J NIA
Anticipated Volume: 1 x 55 [7J Drums D 5-Gallon D 30-Gallon D 55-Gallon D Tote
D Bulk D Tanker D Pump Truck D Other:
Estimated Frequency: D Weekly D Semimonthly D Monthly D Quarterly [7J other OT
F. Constituents G. Other Hazards
Total must be equal to 100%. All constituents, including debns must be identified. D Radioactive
Constituents Actual 0/o Range D Water Reactive
Oil 100% D Oxidizer
D OSHA
D Carcinogen
D Explosive
D Pesticide
D Polymerizable
D Organic Peroxide
D Infectious
D Pryophoric
H. Process Flow Chart
Using the space provided, draw a flow chart showing how waste is generated
I. Constituents
These values are based on 0 Generator Knowledge D Analytical Results D MSDS
All ana/~icaf data e_rovided relevant to this e.rofife must be conducted bl:'.: laboratories that have NELAPINELAC accreditation.
Accreditation Number: Name:
Address: Phone:
Jnorgamc
Metals Level (mg/I) Other Cone. Pesticides/Herbicides Level (mg/I) 0004 Arsenic 5.0 <5. Ammonia n/a 0012 Endrin n/a 0005 Barium 100.0 <Tlml'i Phosphorus --;;la 0013 Lindane --;;la 0006 Cadmium 1.0 <Tu Formaldehyde --;;la 0014 Methoxychlor --;;la 0007 Chromium 5.0 ---z51, Total Solids --;;la 0015 Toxaphene --;;la 0008 Lead 5.0 ---z51, PCBs --;;la 0016 2,4-0 --;;la 0009 Mercury 0.2 <1f2" Copper --;;la 0017 2,4,5-TP --;;la 0010 Selenium 1.0 <Tu Nickel --;;la 0020 Chlordane --;;la 0011 Silver 5.0 ---z51, Zinc --;;la 0031 Heptachlor --;;la ---------
urgarnc
Volatile Compounds Level (mg/I) Semi-Volatile Compounds level {mg/l) 0018 Benzene 0.5 < 0.5 0023 o-Cresol 200.0 < 200.0 0019 Carbon Tetrachloride 0.5 ~ 0024 m-Cresol 200.0 ~ 0021 Chlorobenzene 100.0 <Tlml'i 0025 p-Cresol 200.0 ~ 0022 Chloroform 6.0 ~ 0026 Cresci 200.0 ~ 0028 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 ~ 0027 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 7.5 ""<To 0029 1, 1-Dichloroethylene 0.7 ---zir, 0030 2,4-Dinitroto!uene 0.13 ~ 0035 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 200.0 ~ 0032 Hexchlorobenzene 0.13 ~ 0039 Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 ---zir, 0033 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.5 ~ 0040 Trichloroethlene 0.5 ~ 0034 Hexachloroethane 3.0 ---zw-0043 Vinyl Chloride 0.2 <1f2" 0036 Nitrolbenzene 2.0 <7u ---0037 Pentachlorophenof 100.0 <Tlml'i
0038 Pyridine 5.0 ---z51,
0041 2,4 ,5-Trichlorophenol 400.0 <4001,
0042 2,4 ,6-Trichlorophenol 2.0 <7u ---
J. General Information
1 0No Dves Is this waste a hazardous material as defined in 49 CFR Section 172.101?
If yes, include shipping name, placard hazard class and packaging group·
2 0No Dves Is this waste regulated as a reportable quantity as defined in 49 CFR Section 172.101 Appendix A?
3 0No Dves Is this waste a marine pollutant as defined in 49 CFR Section 172.101 Appendix B?
4 0No Dves Is this hazardous waste, as determined by performing the Hazardos Waste Determination prescribed
at CFR262.11? (Attach Documentation)
5 0No Dves Does this waste contain any amount of Listed Hazardous Waste in 40 CFR 261.31, Hazardous Waste from
Non-specific Sources; 261.32, Hazardous Waste from Specific Sources; and 261.33, Discarded Commercial
Chemical Products, Off specification Species, Container Residues. and Spill Residues?
6 0No Dves Does waste fail any of the four Hazardous Waste Characteristics of ignitibility, corrosiv1ty, reactivity, and
toxicity, as defined in 40 CFR 261.21, 261.22, 261.23, 261.23, respectively?
7 0No Dves Is this waste state regulated? Jf Yes, define:
8 0No Dves Are Material Safety Data Sheets and/or all analytical data relevant to this profile data sheet attached?
9 0No Dves Is this waste derived from an Investigation of an Undergroud Storage Tank release (IDW)?
K. Sample
Has a sample been included? D Yes 0 No If yes, sampled by: Date:
L Generator's Certification
I hereby certify that all information submitted in this and attached documents is correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that
any samples submitted are representative of the actual waste. If A&D Environmental Services discovers a descrepancy during
the approval process, Generator grants A&D Environmental Services the authol"ity to amend the profile, as A&D Environmental
Services LLC deems necessary, to reflect the descrepancy
;:;i~:·/:i!atJ,Li:tl, Print Name Date
/1 I I, /.. / f' /3//<t: l-f/ c ' I /i/9 ,rr-4·:-' t '
A&D Environmental Services, Inc.
2718 Uwharrie Rd., Archdale, NC 27263
336-434-7750 FAX: [phone]
Reserved for Facility Use Approval Date: By: yr rom
-----Expiration Date: Approval Date
D Solidification D Recovery Profile Number:
A. Billing Information
Company MidMAtlantic Associates Account#
Address 409 Rogers View Court
City/State Raleigh, NC Zip 2761 O Contact
Phone [phone] Fax
B. Generator Information/location of Waste
Generator Name Former Glen Raven Mill Site Contact
Address 800 Manning Street
City/State Kinston, NC Zip
Contact Phone
Type of Business
C. Waste Description
Common Name of Waste
Process Generating Waste
D. Physical Properties
Physical State
[] 100 % Solid
Empty Drum Poly
Unused out of date material
Odor Color
Describe:
EPAID
Viscosity
D low
Kelly Johnson
NCCESQG
SIC Code
Specific Gravity
D
D
0/o Liquid
Sludge
0 None
D Mild
D Strong
D Medium
[] High
6-8 lb/gallon
0 °/o Free Liquid Describe:
Flash Point
D
D
D
<73 F
73-99 F
100-139 F
0 140-199 F
0 >199 F
0N/A
pH
D <2
D 2.1 -4.9
D 5-9
09.1-12.4
D > 12.5
[] N/A
Water
D <5%
D 5-10%
D 10-30%
D 30-80%
D 80-100%
[7J N/A
Is this waste incompatibile with other material? B No D Yes If Yes, explain:
E. Volume
Anticipated Volume:
Estimated Frequency:
F. Constituents
1 x 55
D Weekly
0 Drums D 5-Gallon D 30-Gallon D 55-Gallon D Tote
D Bulk D Tanker D Pump Truck D Other:
D Semimonthly D Monthly D Quarterly 0 Other OT
G. Other Hazards
Total must be equal to 100%). All constituents, including debris must be identified [] Radioactive
Constituents Actual 0/o Range D Water Reactive
Empty Poly drums 100°/o D Oxidizer
D OSHA
D Carcinogen
D Explosive
D Pesticide
D Polymerizable
D Organic Peroxide
D Infectious
D Pryophoric
H. Process Flow Chart
Using the space provided, draw a tlow chart showing how waste is generated
I. Constituents
These values are based on D Generator Knowledge D Analytical Results D MSDS
All analytical data provided relevant to this profile must be conducted by laboratories that have NELAP!NELAC accreditation.
Accreditation Number: Name:
Address: Phone:
1norgamc
Metals Level (mg/I) Other Cone. Pesticides/Herbicides Level 0004 Arsenic s.o <5. Ammonia nla 0012 Endrin 0005 Barium 100.0 <Tllll1f Phosphorus ~ 0013 Lindane 0006 Cadmium 1.0 <'Ta Formaldehyde ~ 0014 Methoxychlor 0007 Chromium 5.0 ~ Total Solids ~ 0015 Toxaphene 0008 Lead 5.0 ~ PCBs ~ 0016 2,4-D 0009 Mercury 0.2 <llT Copper -~ 0017 2,4,5-TP 0010 Selenium 1.0 <'Ta Nickel ~ 0020 Chlordane 0011 Silver 5.0 ~ Zinc ~ 0031 Heptachlor ------
urgamc
Volatile Compounds Level (mg/I) Semi-Volatile Compounds Level 0018 Benzene 0.5 < 0.5 0023 o-Cresol
0019 Carbon Tetrachloride OS ---.en:, 200.0
0024 m-Cresol 200.0 0021 Chlorobenzene 100.0 <Tllll1f 0025 p-Cresol 200.0 0022 Chloroform 6.0 «ru 0026 Cresol 200.0 0028 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 ---.en:, 0027 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 7.5 0029 1, 1-Dichloroethylene 0.7 <11:r 0030 2.4-Dinitrotoluene 0.13 0035 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 200.0 <2ll1llT 0032 Hexch!orobenzene 0.13 0039 Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 <11:r 0033 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.5 0040 T richloroethlene O.S ---.en:, 0034 Hexachforoethane 3.0 0043 Vinyl Chloride 0.2 <llT 0036 Nitrolbenzene 2.0 ---0037 Pentach!orophenol 100.0
0038 Pyridine 5.0
0041 2,4,5-T richlorophenol 400.0
0042 2,4,6-T richlorophenol 2.0
J. General Information
1 0 No D Yes Is this waste a hazardous material as defined in 49 CFR Section 172.101?
2 0No Dves
3 DNo Dves
4 0No Dves
5 DNo Dves
6 D No Dves
7 D No Dves
s [] No Dves
g 0 No Dves
K. Sample
If yes, include shipping name, placard hazard class and packaging group:
Is this waste regulated as a reportable quantity as defined in 49 CFR Section 172.101 Appendix A?
Is this waste a marine pollutant as defined in 49 CFR Section 172.101 Appendix B?
Is this hazardous waste, as determined by performing the Hazardos Waste Determination prescribed
atCFR262.11? (Attach Documentation)
Does this waste contain any amount of Listed Hazardous Waste in 40 CFR 261.31, Hazardous Waste from
Non-specific Sources; 261.32, Hazardous Waste from Specific Sources; and 261.33, Discarded Commercial
Chemical Products. Off specification Species, Container Residues, and Spill Residues?
Does waste fail any of the four Hazardous Waste Characteristics of ignitibitity, corrosivity, reactivity, and
toxicity, as defined in 40 CFR 261.21, 261.22, 261.23, 261.23, respectNely?
Is this waste state regulated? lf Yes, define:
Are Material Safety Data Sheets and/or all analytical data relevant to this profile data sheet attached?
Is this waste derived from an Investigation of an Undergroud Storage Tank release (IDW)?
Has a sample been included? D Yes [,_] No If yes, sampled by: Date:
L. Generator's Certification
J hereby certify that all information submitted in this and attached documents is correct to the best of my knowledge I also certify that
any samples submitted are representative of the actual waste. If A&D Environmental Services discovers a descrepancy during
the approval process, Generator grants A&D Environmental Services the authority to amend the profile, as A&D Environmental
Services LLC deems necessary, to reflect the descrepancy.
Print Name Date
/111, 11 l I .1~1,lr
(mg/I)
nla -;;ra-
-;;ra-
~ -;;ra-
~
~
~ ---
(mg/I)
< 200.0
<2ll1llT
<2ll1llT
<2ll1llT ---zn-
<lnT
<lnT ---.en:,
~
---z:1:o
<Tllll1f «ru
<41llflf
---z:1:o ---
A&D Environmental Services · Bill of lading I Material Manifest
/ A&D Job No: I Generator ID Number
I
Page 1 of I, Emergency Response Phone Tracking Number ' NCCESQG 1 800-255-3924-MIS0007951 19708
I Gener8.lor's site address (if different from mailirlg address) ------Generator's Name and Mailing A~ress GI R M'II ormer en aven I 800 Manning street 'lC)f 1 uJ, 11-41-rM,/JA v ,e, Kinston, NC
K,·rJ~lvtu IN t, ;tf{!{d-/
1
Transporter 1 D2D Company Name A&D Environmental Services, Inc. US EPA ID No: NCD986232221
--faansporter 1~D Company Name A&D Environmental Services (SC), LLC US EPA ID No: SCD987598331
LJ __J Designated Facility __ J ----6,6.,1 Designated Facility Designated Facility Designated Facility
A&D Environmental Services, Inc. A&D Environmental Services, Inc. A&D Environmental Services {SC), LLC A&D Environmental Services {SC), LLC 2718 Uwharrie Road 3149 Lear Drive 1741 Calks Ferry Road 1321 White Horse Road, Suite C
Archdale, NC 27263 Burlington, NC 27215 Lexington, SC 29073 Greenville, SC 29605 336-434-7750 336-229-0058 803-957-9175 864-234-6055 NCD986232221 NCR000138628 SCD987598331
HM Hazardous Materials Shipping Name and Description (if applicable) No_ Type QTY Wt/Vol Profile Number
___. 1'14atefial (VeFSatiAt 2016 --DF p
-G 14ofJ . --. --.-,. 2016 --DM p -
;;z_ 5cJ1:
'" NQR RegYlateG Material (VVVV TfeatmeRt ResiA 55 Gal) ·--
I OM
400
p
----· PetrolE:_~m Products for Recycle No_ Type QTY Wt/Vol Profile Number -~-----x NA1993, Diesel fuel, 3, Ill ERG# 128 I -----x NA1993, Fuel oil (No.1,2,4,5 or 6), 3, Ill ERG# 128 i -·------x UN1203, Gasoline, 3, H ERG# 128
USED OIL (Not a USDOT Hilzardous Material) ·---
Petroleum Contact Watef" (Not a USOOT Hazardous Material) r= ---------· ---
----·--... _. ______
Un!versa! Waste Lamps, Batteries, Ballasts, and Electronics for Recycle
HM No. Type Est. Wt. Count ___ Sh)_pping Name and Description (if applicable} _ Common Name Discrepancy x RO, UN2809, Me:cury contained in manufactured articles, 8, 111 ERG/I 172 Mercury Containing Articles -x _RO, UN3432, Polychlorinated_biphenyls. solid. 9, II ERG# 171 TSCA Exempt PCB lamp Balla_~~ x UN2800, Batteries, wet, nonspillable, 8. ill ERG# 154 Sealed Lead Ai:;id !3atteries -------· x UN2794, Batteries, wet, filled with acid, 8, Ill ERG# 154 Lead Acid Batteries
' --·--x UN2795, Batteries, wet, filled with alkali,~:_ Ill ERG# 154 Wet NiCad Batteries
'""-~-x UN3090, Lithium batteries, 9, II ERG# 138 Lithium Batteries ' x UN3028, Batteries, dry, containing potassium hydroxide solid, 8, Ill ERG# 15<1 Alkaline Batteries ' x UN3028, Batteries, dry, containing potassium hydroxide solid, 8, !II ERG# 15<1 ··--NiCad Batteries
Universal Waste Lamps (Not DOT-Regulated per 49 CFR 173.164(e) i F-!uorescent lamps 4' or<
Universal Waste Lamps (Not DOT-Regulated per 49 CFR 173.164(e) ···------+--Fluorescent lamps 4'
Universal Waste Lamps (Not ogT-Reguiated per 49 CF~ 173.164(0'j'-----·-·--Cfrcular/U-tube lamps
Universal Waste Lamps (Not DOT-Regulated per 49 CFR 173.1~4(e) Compact lamps
Universal Waste Lamps (Not DOT-Regulated per 49 CFR 173.164{e) Shattershield
-Universal Waste lamps (Not DOT-~egulated per 49 CFR .. 173.164(e) H!DIMV/UV lamps
~-Universal Waste Lamps (Not DOT-_Regulated p_:-r 49 CFR 173.164(e) __ ---· Incandescent La:nps
Non-PCB Light Ballasts for Recycle (Not DOT-Regulate~) -Non-PCB light Ballasts
Electronic Equipment for Recycle (Not DOT-Regulated) --Electronics
Generator's Certification: This is lo certify that the above-named materials are properly classified, descnbed. packaged, marked, and labeled, and are in proper condition for transportation according to.the
applicable regulations of the Department of Transportation. I further certify that none of the materials described above ere a hazardous waste as defined by EPA 40CFR Part 261 or any applicable state law, and
unless specifically identified above the materials contain less than 1,000 ppm total halogens and do not contain quantifiable lev~ls (2ppm) of ~_?Bs as defined by EPA40 CFR Parts 279 and 761.
Gen?J//~;ecor's Print•,;;ed Name Signaturp Month Day Year -. -A / , J,____
1 .. ~ µuL, I g I /J' 1/::6 ···--Transp rter 1 Printed/ 1yp1fd Name
tD)l?A7
j Signature ' '. / j .\}1 ,<../\ Month Day Year
. {YJAU ··~--4z5,~ I~ I (8: I~ Transporter 2 Prlnted/Typ°edName Signature -\_~ Mo th Day ar
I I I I Discrepancy Indication I Additional Information:
Designated Facility Certification: I hereby acknowledge receipt of the materials covered by this manifest except for any discrepancy indicated above.
Printed /Typed Name Signature ----Month Day Year
A&D Environmental Services , Bill of Lading I Material Manifest
~~~~~-----~~-~-~~~--------~~-~~~~----~--~~-~~~~~~~---·-··---~ / A&D Job No: I Generator ID Number 1. Page 1 of I Emergency Response Phone Tracking Number 19 .7 Q q· '
NCCESQG 1 800-255-3924-MIS0007951 _
Geherator's Name and Mailing Address I Generator's site address (if different from mai!in·g--acdcdcre-ssc)~--
Former Glep j,?ven Mill ,,.,1,,., 1,,11, ---,.,, • .• ~ BOO Manning Street 11.J/ ?> _ _.vw IT•~ Kinston, NC
I{."' :, f,;n,.IJ µ(.. ), 15' d--/ I
Transporter 1 D 20 Company Name A&D Environmental Services, Inc. US EPA JO No: NCD986232221
1--------,--,----------------------------------+---------··-
/ Transporter 1 tgr:;o Company Name A&D Environmental Services (SC), LLC US EPA ID No: SCD98759B331
"XJ_-,,~O-,-,i-go-,-,,-,=F,-,cilcity-~-----,___J-~~D-escig-,-,-,,-dcFca-,cilcity-------,_-·-_,j~o-,csi-g,-,-,.-,cF~,-,cilcity--------·----~Dc,-,c,g~,-,,-,cd~Fc,,-,clit-y------···--
A&D Environmental Services, Inc. A&D Environmental Services, Inc. A&D Environmental Services (SC), LLC A&D Environmental Services (SC), LLC
2718 Uwharrie Road 3149 Lear Drive 1741 Calks Ferry Road 1321 White Horse Road, Suite C
Archdale, NC 27263 Burlington, NC 27215 Lexington, SC 29073 Greenville, SC 29605
336-434-7750 336-229-0058 803-957-9175 864-234-6055
NCD986232221 NCR000138628 SCD987598331
HM Hazardous Materials Shipping Name and Description (if applicable)
m -• ~
No. Type QTY WI/Vol Profile Number
2016 -
' , OF p
---) 3tJ{)
2016 -' -., .... , -, DF p
~l-L;()
I -------------"'"
f-----f---------=-c--c--=c-·c--c--.cc=--=-cc----------+---cc---+-----1------!···· -·-+-----···-------·-··------f-~~---+-ccc-c=-~cc--cc-ccc-Pcectr_o __ leum Products for Recycle No Type QTY Wt/Vol Profile Number
X NA 1993, Dfesel fuel, 3, Ill ERG# 128
f---cXC""--+-c-NccAc1cc9cc93~.~F~u-e"'I colc-1 "(N~o-.~1,cc2-.4c-.5c-o-, cc6)-. 73-, "mc----·----------E-R_G_#_1_2_8 __ __, _____ _ ---+·-----... +---1----------·---
X UN1203, Gasoline, 3, ll ERG# 128 f----+-----+-----!-····------------.. USED OIL (Not a USDOT Hazardous Material)
Petroleum Contact Water (Not a USDOT Hazardous Materi-alc)-------·--+------s,---+---··-+---+-··--·---------··-·--
Universal Waste Lamps, Batteries, Ballasts, and Electronics for Recycle
Discrepancy HM No, Type Est. Wt. Count Shipping Name and Description {if applicable) ===--+--C_o_mmon Name
X RO, UN2B09, Mercury contained in manufacture_d articles, 8, Ill ERcG_#=1_7_2+ __ M_e_'"-"~Cf_C_o_o __ rn_io_i,~g_A_n_ic_le_s_f-----------
X RO, UN3432, Polychlorinated biphenyls, solid, 9. II ERG# 171 TSCA Exempt PCB lamp Ballasts -----~--·
f---~X~-+----t---+-----+-----+--cU=Nc2=~00, Batteries, ~et, nonspillable, 8, II! ERG# 154 Sealed lead Acid Ba~:~-., ____ _
X UN2794, Batteries, wet, filled with acid, 8, Ill ERG# 154 Lead Acid Batter_le~s--+-----'"--
X UN2795, Batteries, wet, filled w'rth alka1·1, 8, !I! ERG# 154 Wet N\Cad Batteries
t---cX=-+----J---+-----+-----+==U=N_3=0_9=0_,cL_it_h_lucm_ba_tt_e_clcecs,~9~,-'_I ~cc-~·~cc-···-=cEcR_G=#=1c3c8-+--Lclt .. h_lu_m_B_a_tt_e_ri•e_s __ +-·------···
f-----------· ··cXXc-+----· UN3028, Batteries, dry, containing potassium hydroxide soltdc,~Bc,cll·cl ~E=R=G=#cc15c4+ __ A_l_ka_l_in_e_B_a_tt_e_cl_n, __ +-------
f---~•-+----+---t-----+-----,~U=Nc3~0_2~8~·~B~a0tteries, dry, containing potassium hydroxide solid, 8, Ill ERG# 154 NiCad Batteries
Unlversal Waste Lamps ·(Not DOT-R8Qula18{f.per 49 CFR 1 !3.164(e) Fluorescent lamps 4c,-,,-<--s------
Universal Waste Lamps {Not DOT-Regulated per 49 CFR 17=3c.c1 s=,-(-e-)----+--F=lu_o_ce_s_ce_o_l_la_m_p-,-,.--+-------
l·····---+----+---t-----+-----~U=nclv-e-,-sa-l=w~,-,tcecl-a-m~p~s-(:·cNOIDOT-R8gulated per 49 CFR 17i 164(e) Circular/U-tube lamps --------····--
f-----+----+---t-----+----~~Ucn_lv_e_,_sa_l_W_aste Lamps {Not DOT-Regulated per 49 CFR 173.164(0) Compact lamps
Universal waS~S(Not DOT-Regulated per 49 CF.R 173.16~.(e) Sha1tershield
f------+-----t-·--+----·+-----+Ucncl_ve~,~'~a~I W~a~st: Lamps (Not DOT-Regulated per 49 CFR 173.164(e) _H_10_1_M_v_1u_v_L_a_m~p_, __ +--------,
f-----+----+---t-----+-----f-U_n_lv_e~c7sa_l_W=c~ste Lamps (Not DOT-Regulated per 49 ~FR 173~.J64(e) _____ ... ~ncandescent_Lamps
Non-PCB Ugh! Ballasts for Recycle {Not DOT-Regulated)_, _______ ---____ Non-PCB Light Ballasts__ ,·. -------j
__ L__-_ Electronic Equipment for Recycle (Not DOT-Regulated)_ ____ . ~-!ectronics -~-r ···---
t--G~.-n-,-,-,,-o~,.c,~cc,cct7ifc;,-,~t1~ao-,=r~hci,ci~,-,o-,-,c,1cily-that the above-named matenals are properly classified, described, packaged, marked, and labeled, and are in proper condition for transportation according to the
applicable regulations of the DGpartment of Transpor1ation. I further certify that norie of the materials described above are a hazardous waste as defined by EPA 40CFA Part 261 or any applicable state law, and
unless specifically identified above the materials contain less than 1,000 ppm total halogens and do not contain quantifiable levels {2ppm) of PCRs as defined by EPA 40 CFA Paris 279 and 761.
Generato.'1' IOffero,'s PclntedlTyrd N~me ...
1
Slgna~/;;··t /l'"'-/ , ·} _-.I -. Month Day Year
/i,Avc.k iiL&:le. . lXtt~f.a..~?IJL _I t'IJ&' 1/b
Tmnsporter 1 Printed 1/yped Name Slgoatuce .. ·· . J Month Day Yeac
f-----· .LJQa-+J lJ,_)rw 1, l -·~---~()~L)), ~ I § I I S::.llL_ Transporter 2 Printed /Typed Name I Signature ~ Month Day Year
r=--~~c-,-c-,-~-----~I_~-···~·· I I I I. Discrepancy Indication I Additional Information: --1
--------------------~-· Designated Fac1hty Certification:! hereby acknowledge receipt of the materials covered by this manlfest except for any discrepancy indicated above
Printed/Typed Name Signature

APPENDIX D

MATRIX HEALTH & SAFETY CONSULTANTS, LLC., SURVEY FOR THE
PRESENCE OF ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS AND LEAD-
BASED PAINTS, DATED AUGUST 23, 2016

Report of Survey to Identify August 23, 2016
Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Page 2
800 Manning Street
Matrix Job No. 160850
Report of Survey to Identify August 23, 2016
Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Page 3
800 Manning Street
Matrix Job No. 160850
Report of Survey to Identify August 23, 2016
Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Page 4
800 Manning Street
Matrix Job No. 160850
Report of Survey to Identify August 23, 2016
Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Page 5
800 Manning Street
Matrix Job No. 160850
Report of Survey to Identify August 23, 2016
Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Page 6
800 Manning Street
Matrix Job No. 160850
Report of Survey to Identify August 23, 2016
Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Page 7
800 Manning Street
Matrix Job No. 160850
LEAD PAINT INSPECTION REPORT
REPORT NUMBER: 08/18/16 09:57
INSPECTION FOR: Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
Raleigh, NC 27610
PERFORMED AT: Former Glen Raven Mill
800 Manning Street
Kinston, NC
INSPECTION DATE: 08/18/16
INSTRUMENT TYPE: RM D
MODEL LPA-1
XRF TYPE ANALYZER
Serial Number: 3212
ACTION LEVEL: 1.0 mg/cm2
OPERATOR LICENSE: ....a.1=20;..;.18=5 ________ _
~/~£--~ SIGNE)f &'.}:/"U~---Date: f:). :i-/ 6'
SUMMARY REPORT OF LEAD PAINT INSPECTION FOR: Mid-Atlantic Associates
Inspection Date: 08/18/16 Former Glen Raven Mill
Report Date: 8/22/2016 800 Manning Street
Abatement Level: 1.0 Kinston, NC
Report No. 08/18/16 09:57
Total Readings: 154 Actionable: 16
Job Started: 08/18/16 09:57
Job Finished: 08/18/16 17:01
Reading Paint Lead
No. Wall Structure Location Member Cond Substrate Color (mg/cm2) Mode
Exterior Room 002 Building #2
028 A Fascia p Wood Blue >9.9 QM
027 A Soffit p Wood White >9.9 QM 030 A Window Ctr Sash p Wood White >9.9 QM
029 A Window Ctr Lft casing p Wood White >9.9 QM
Exterior Room 004 Build. 3-2
053 A Corner board Rgt I Metal Lt.Green 1. 0 QM
Exterior Room 005 Build. 3-4
067 A Soffit p Wood Green >9.9 QM
068 A Sof. Sup. Ctr p Wood Green 7.3 QM
Interior Room 002 1-Foyer
043 A Window Ctr Sash p Wood Gray 4.4 QM 104 B Wall L Ctr p Brick Blue 1. 0 QM
Interior Room 003 1-Manu.
114 A Posts Ctr p Brick Dk. Blue 6.7 QM
Interior Room 004 1-Chiller
122 A Railing Rgt Railing I Metal Yellow 1.0 QM
Interior Room 005 2nd-Man.
135 A Post Ctr p Wood Blue 4 .1 QM 130 B Sliding Dr. Lft p Metal Blue 2.1 QM
Interior Room 008 Basement
143 B Door Ctr U Ctr p Metal Blue 3.8 QM
147 c Window Ctr Sash p Metal Gray 5.1 QM
146 c Window Ctr Lft casing p Metal Gray 9.6 QM
Calibration Readings
----End of Readings----
1
SEQUENTIAL REPORT OF LEAD PAINT INSPECTION FOR: Mid-Atlantic Associates
Inspection Date: 08/18/16 Former Glen Raven Mill
Report Date: 8/22/2016 800 Manning Street
Abatement Level: 1.0 Kinston, NC
Report No. 08/18/16 09:57
Total Readings: 154
Job Started: 08/18/16 09:57
Job Finished: 08/18/16 17:01
Read Rm Room Paint Lead
No. No. Name Wall Structure Location Member Cond Substrate Color (mg/cm2) Mode
l CALIBRATION l. 0 QM 2 CALIBRATION l. 0 QM 3 CALIBRATION l. 0 QM 4 CALIBRATION 0 .2 QM
5 CALIBRATION -0 .2 QM
6 CALIBRATION 0.0 QM 7 001 Building #1 B Wall U Lft I Metal White -0.2 QM
8 001 Building #1 B Bollard Lft p Metal Yellow -0.1 QM
9 001 Building #1 B Bollard Lft p Metal Red -0 .2 QM
10 001 Building #1 B Door Lft Lft jamb p Metal Blue -0.3 QM
11 001 Building #1 B Door Lft U Ctr I Metal Black -o.s QM 12 001 Building #1 c Safety Box Rgt p Metal Yellow -0.1 QM 13 001 Building #1 c Shelter Rgt p Metal White -0.2 QM
14 001 Building #1 D Door Rgt U Ctr I Metal White -0.2 QM
15 001 Building #1 D Air Comp. Rgt I Metal Green -0.3 QM 16 001 Build.ing l B Beam Rgt I Metal Red -0.l QM 17 001 Building 1 B Wall L Rgt I wood Lt. Blue -0.4 QM 18 001 Building 1 B Baseboard Ctr I Wood Dk. Blue -0.3 QM
19 001 Building 1 B Door Ctr U Ctr I Wood White -0.3 QM
20 001 Building l B Wall L Ctr P Drywall Blue -0.4 QM 21 001 Building 1 B Elec. Panel Ctr I Wood Tan -0.3 QM
22 001 Building 1 c Equipment Rgt I Metal Green -0.3 QM
23 001 Building 1 D Equipment Ctr I Metal Green -0.2 QM
24 001 Building l D Cat Walk Ctr r Metal Yellow 0.1 QM 25 001 Building l c Bumper Ctr I Metal Yellow -0.1 QM
26 001 Building l D Blender Ctr I Metal White -0.1 QM
27 002 Building #2 A Soffit P Wood White >9.9 QM 28 002 Building #2 A Fascia p Wood Blue >9.9 QM
29 002 Building #2 A Window Ctr Lft casing p Wood White >9.9 QM 30 002 Building #2 A Window Ctr Sash P Wood White >9.9 QM
31 002 Building #2 A Window Ctr Sill P Concrete White -0.4 QM 32 002 Building #2 A A/C Ctr p Metal White -0.1 QM
33 002 Building #2 B Porch Floor Ctr p Concrete Blue -0.2 QM
34 002 Buil ding #2 c Porch Post Ctr P Metal Black -0.2 QM
35 002 Building #2 D Crawl. Door Lft I Metal Red -0.l QM
36 002 Building #2 D Crawl Door Rgt p Wood Red -0 .4 QM 37 002 1-Foyer A Wall U Ctr I Drywall Wallpapr 0.0 QM
38 002 1-Foyer A Chair rail Ctr I Wood Pink -0 .1 QM
39 002 1-Foyer A Chair rail Ctr I Wood White -0.1 QM
40 002 1-Foyer B Closet Ctr Door I Wood White -0.3 QM
41 002 1-Foyer B Closet Ctr Door Casing I Wood White 0.0 QM
42 002 1-P'oyer A Window Ctr Lft casing p Wood Gray 0 .0 QM
43 002 1-Foyer A Window Ctr Sash p Wood Gray 4.4 QM
44 002 1-Foyer A Window Ctr Sill p Wood Gray -0.1 QM
45 002 1-Foyer D Door Rgt Lft casing p Wood Gray 0 .0 QM
46 002 1-Foyer D Door Rgt Lft jamb p Wood Gray -0.2 QM
47 003 BUil.d. 3-l A Wall L Rgt I Metal Lt.Green -0.1 QM
l
SEQUENTIAL REPORT OF LEAD PAINT INSPECTION FOR: Mid-Atlantic Associates
Read Rm Room Paint Lead
No. No. Name Wall Structure Location Member Cond Substrate Color (mg/cm2) Mode
48 003 Build. 3-1 A Crawl Vent Rgt p Metal Gree.n 0 .0 QM
49 003 Build. 3-1 A Railing Rgt Railing p Metal Green -0 .1 QM so 003 Build. 3-1 A Porch Floor Rgt p Concrete Gray -0.2 QM 51 003 Build. 3-1 A Threshold Rgt p Metal Green -0.1 QM
52 004 Build. 3-2 A Downspout Rgt I Metal Brown -0.1 QM 53 004 Build. 3-2 A Corner board Rgt I Metal Lt.Green 1. 0 QM 54 004 Build. 3-2 A Wall L Rgt I Cinderbloc Lt.Green -0.1 QM
55 004 Build. 3-2 A Foundation Rgt I Concrete Lt.Green -0.2 QM 56 004 Build. 3-2 A Window Rgt Rgt casing p Wood White 0.0 QM
57 004 Build. 3-2 A Door Ctr U Ctr p Metal Green -0.5 QM
58 004 Build. 3-2 A Door Ctr Lft casing p Metal Green 0.2 QM
59 004 Build. 3-2 A Panel Ctr p Metal Lt.Green -0.3 QM
60 004 Build. 3-2 A Door Lft U Ctr p Metal Lt.Green -0.2 QM
61 004 Build. 3-2 A Window Lft Lft casing p Wood Lt.Green -0.1 QM
62 003 Build. 3-1 A Stairs Ctr Stringer p Metal Lt.Green -0.1 QM
63 003 Build. 3-1 A Chiller Ctr p Metal Lt.Green 0.0 QM
64 003 Build. 3-1 A Door Ctr U Ctr I Metal White -0.3 QM
65 003 Build. 3-1 A Door Ctr Rgt casing P Metal Green 0.1 QM
66 005 Build. 3-4 A Wall u Ctr P Wood Green -0.3 QM
67 005 Build. 3-4 A Soffit P Wood Green >9.9 QM
68 005 Build. 3-4 A Sof. Sup. Ctr p Wood Green 7.3 QM
69 005 Build. 3-4 A Fascia p Metal Green 0.0 QM
70 006 Build. 3-5 A Door Ctr Rgt casing p Metal Green -0.1 QM
71 006 Build. 3-5 A Railing Ctr Railing p Metal Green 0.2 QM
72 006 Build. 3-5 A Door Lft U Ctr p Metal White -0.5 QM
73 006 Build. 3-5 A Door Lft Rgt casing p Metal White -0.1 QM
74 006 Build. 3-5 A Compactor Lft p Metal Gray -0.3 QM
75 006 Build. 3-5 B Door Ctr U Ctr p Metal Lt. Blue -0.1 QM
76 006 Build. 3-5 c Door Ctr U Ctr p Metal Lt. Blue -0.1 QM
77 003 Build. 3-1 c Stairs Ctr Stringer p Metal Gray 0.0 QM
78 003 Build. 3-1 c Door Ctr Rgt casing p Wood White -0.3 QM
79 003 Build, 3-1 c Door Ctr U Ctr p Metal Lt. Blue -0 .3 QM
80 003 Build, 3-1 c Door Ctr Rgt casing p Metal Lt. Blue -0.1 QM 81 003 Build. 3-1 c Crawl Case Ctr P Metal Lt.Green -0.2 QM
82 007 Build. 3-7 c Wall u Ctr I Metal Gray 0.0 QM
83 007 Build. 3-7 c Corner board Lft p Metal Gray -0.6 QM
84 007 Build. 3-7 D Door Lft Lft casing p Metal Gray -0.2 QM
85 007 Build. 3-7 D Door Lft Lft casing p Wood Blue -0.2 QM
86 001 Building #1 c Stairs Lft stringer I Metal Gray 0.3 QM
87 001 Building #1 c Door Lft U Ctr p Metal Blue -0.2 QM
88 001 Building #1 c Door Lft U Ctr p Wood Blue 0.0 QM
89 001 Building #1 c Door Lft Rgt casing p Wood Blue -0.3 QM
90 001 Building #1 c Door Lft Lft casing p Wood Lt.Green -0.3 QM
91 001 Building #1 c Window Lft Sill p Concrete Lt.Green 0.3 QM
92 001 Building #1 c Win.Insert Lft p Wood Tan -0.3 QM
93 008 Build. 3 -6 D Door Rgt Lft casing P Wood Lt.Green -0 .4 QM
94 008 Build. 3-6 D Door Rgt Lft casing p Brick Lt.Green -0.4 QM
95 008 Build. 3-6 A Railing Rgt Railing p Metal Gray -0.1 QM
96 008 Build. 3 -6 A Door Rgt Lft casing P Metal Lt .Green 0.0 QM
97 008 Build. 3-6 A Door Lft Lft casing P Wood Lt.Green -0.4 QM
98 CALIBRATION 1. 0 QM 99 CALIBRATION 1. 0 QM
100 CALIBRATION 1. 0 QM
101 CALIBRATION 0.0 QM
102 CALIBRATION -0 .1 QM
2
SEQUENTIAL REPORT OF LEAD PAINT INSPECTION FOR: Mid-Atlantic Associates
Read Rm Room Paint Lead
No. No. Name Wall Structure Location Member Cond Substrate Color (mg/cm2) Mode
103 CALIBRATION 0.0 QM
104 002 1-Foyer B Wall L Ctr p Brick Blue 1.0 QM 105 002 1-Foyer c Wall L Ctr p Brick White 0.2 QM
106 002 1-Foyer c Wall u Ctr P Brick Green 0.2 QM
107 002 1 -Foyer c Wall L Ctr p Drywall Blue -0.1 QM
108 002 1-Foyer c Door Ctr Lft casing p Wood Blue 0.5 QM
109 002 1-Foyer c Door Ctr U Ctr p Wood Blue -0.3 QM
110 002 1-Foyer c Stairs Rgt Wall p Wood Blue -0.l QM
111 002 1-Foyer c Stairs Lft Risers p Wood Blue -0.l QM
112 003 1-Manu. A Wall L Ctr p Brick Lt. Blue -0.1 QM
113 003 1-Manu. A Baseboard Ctr I Brick Dk. Blue -0.l QM
114 003 1-Manu. A Posts Ctr P Brick Dk. Blue 6.7 QM
115 003 1-Manu. B Wall L Lft I Brick Lt. Blue -0.2 QM
116 003 1 -Manu. A Equipment Ctr p Metal Green 0.4 QM
117 003 1-Manu. A Equipment Ctr I Metal Gray 0.4 QM
118 003 1-Manu. A Post Ctr I Metal Blue -0.1 QM
119 003 1-Manu. c Ceiling p Wood White -0.1 QM
120 003 1-Manu. c Beam Ctr p Wood White 0.0 QM
121 003 1-Manu. A Wall L Ctr p Brick Blue 0 .5 QM
122 004 1-Chiller A Railing Rgt Railing I Metal Yellow 1.0 QM
123 004 1-Chiller B Wall L Lft P Brick Blue 0.2 QM
124 004 l-Chiller D Ductwork Rgt I Metal Blue 0.0 QM
125 004 1-Chiller c Post Ctr I Metal Blue -0.2 QM
126 005 2nd-Man. A Beam Rgt I Metal Blue 0 .0 QM
127 005 2nd-Man. A Railing Ctr Railing p Wood Blue 0.0 QM
128 005 2nd-Man. A Ceiling I Wood White -0.4 QM
129 006 2nd-Baths c Door Rgt U Ctr I Wood Blue -0.2 QM
130 005 2nd-Man. B Sliding Dr. Lft p Metal Blue 2.1 QM
131 005 2nd-Man. A Wall u Ctr p Brick Lt. Blue -0 .1 QM
132 005 2nd-Man. A Wall L Ctr p Brick White 0.6 QM
133 005 2nd-Man. A Stairs Ctr Treads p Concrete Blue -0.4 QM
134 005 2nd-Man. c Wall L Ctr p Wood Lt. Blue -0.1 QM 135 005 2nd-Man. A Post Ctr p Wood Blue 4.1 QM
136 005 2nd-Man. c Elevator Lft p Metal Blue -0.2 QM
137 005 2nd-Man. c Pipe Lft p Metal Red -0 .6 QM
138 006 2nd-Baths c Wall L Ctr p Ceramic White -0.3 QM
139 006 2nd-Baths c Floor p Ceramic Gray -0 .1 QM
140 007 Build. 3-5 c Beam Ctr I Metal White -0 .1 QM
141 008 Basement B Stairs Ctr Stringer I Metal Black -0.1 QM
142 008 Basement B Wall L Ctr P Brick Blue 0.0 QM
143 008 Basement B Door Ctr U Ctr p Metal Blue 3.8 QM
144 008 Basement c Beam Ctr I Metal Blue -0 .1 QM
145 008 Basement c Beam Ctr I Metal Red -0.1 QM
146 008 Basement c Window Ctr Lft casing p Metal Gray 9 .6 QM
147 008 Basement c Window Ctr Sash p Metal Gray 5.1 QM
148 008 Basement c Door Ctr Lft casing p Wood Green -0 .3 QM
149 CALIBRATION l. 0 QM
150 CALIBRATION 1. 0 QM
151 CALIBRATI ON 1. 0 QM
152 CALIBRATION 0.3 QM
153 CALIBRATION -0 .2 QM
154 CALIBRATION 0.0 QM ----End of Readings ----
3
DETAILED REPORT OF LEAD PAINT INSPECTION FOR: Mid-Atlantic Associates
Inspection Date: 08/18/16 Former Glen Raven Mill
Report Date: 8/22/2016 800 Manning Street
Abatement Level: 1.0 Kinston, NC
Report No. 08/18/16 09:57
Total Readings: 154
Job Started: 08/18/16 09:57
Job Finished: 08/18/16 17:01
Reading Paint Lead
No. Wall Structure Location Member Cond Substrate Color (mg/cm2) Mode
Exterior Room 001 Building #1
007 B Wall u Lft I Metal White -0.2 QM
010 B Door Lft Lft jamb p Metal Blue -0.3 QM 011 B Door Lft U Ctr I Metal Black -0.5 QM 008 B Bollard Lft p Metal Yellow -0.1 QM
009 B Bollard Lft p Metal Red -0.2 QM
091 c Window Lft Sill p Concrete Lt.Green 0.3 QM
089 c Door Lft Rgt casing p Wood Blue -0.3 QM
090 c Door Lft Lft casing p Wood Lt.Green -0.3 QM 087 c Door Lft U Ctr p Metal Blue -0.2 QM
088 c Door Lft U Ctr p Wood Blue o.o QM
086 c Stairs Lft Stringer I Metal Gray 0.3 QM
092 c Win .Insert Lft p Wood Tan -0.3 QM
012 c Safety Box Rgt p Metal Yellow -0.1 QM
013 c Shelter Rgt p Metal White -0.2 QM
014 D Door Rgt U Ctr I Metal White -0.2 QM 015 D Air Comp. Rgt I Metal Green -0.3 QM
Exterior Room 002 Building #2
028 A Fascia p Wood Blue >9.9 QM
027 A Soffit p Wood White >9.9 QM
030 A Window Ctr Sash p Wood White >9.9 QM
031 A Window Ctr Sill p Concrete White -0.4 QM
029 A Window Ctr Lft casing p Wood White >9.9 QM
032 A A/C Ctr p Metal White -0.1 QM 033 B Porch Floor Ctr p Concrete Blue -0.2 QM
034 c Porch Post Ctr p Metal Black -0.2 QM
035 D Crawl Door Lft I Metal Red -0.1 QM 036 D Crawl Door Rgt p Wood Red -0.4 QM
Exterior Room 003 Build. 3-1
047 A Wall L Rgt I Metal Lt.Green -0.1 QM
065 A Door Ctr Rgt casing p Metal Green 0.1 QM
064 A Door Ctr U Ctr I Metal White -0.3 QM
062 A Stairs Ctr Stringer p Metal Lt.Green -0.1 QM 049 A Railing Rgt Railing p Metal Green -0.l QM
063 A Chiller Ctr p Metal Lt.Green 0.0 QM
048 A Crawl Vent Rgt p Metal Green 0.0 QM
050 A Porch Floor Rgt p Concrete Gray -0.2 QM
051 A Threshold Rgt p Metal Green -0.1 QM
078 c Door Ctr Rgt casing p Wood White -0.3 QM
080 c Door Ctr Rgt casing p Metal Lt. Blue -0.l QM
079 c Door Ctr U Ctr p Metal Lt. Blue -0.3 QM
077 c Stairs Ctr Stringer p Metal Gray o.o QM
081 c Crawl Case Ctr p Metal Lt.Green -0.2 QM
Exterior Room 004 Build. 3 -2
054 A Wall L Rgt I Cinderbloc Lt.Green -0.1 QM
055 A Foundation Rgt I Concrete Lt.Green -0.2 QM
053 A Corner board Rgt I Metal Lt.Green 1.0 QM
1
DETAI LED REPORT OF LEAD PAINT INSPECTION FOR: Mid-Atlantic Associates
Reading Paint Lead
No. Wall S tructure Location Member Cond Substrate Color (mgfcm2) Mode
061 A Window Lft Lft casing p Wood Lt.Green -0.1 QM
056 A Window Rgt Rgt casing p Wood White 0.0 QM 060 A Door Lft U Ctr p Metal Lt.Green -0.2 QM
058 A Door Ctr Lft casing p Metal Green 0.2 QM
057 A Door Ctr U Ctr p Metal Green -0.5 QM
059 A Panel Ctr p Metal Lt.Green -0.3 QM 052 A Downspout Rgt I Metal Brown -0.1 QM
Exterior Room 005 Build. 3-4
066 A Wall u Ctr p Wood Green -0.3 QM 069 A Fascia p Metal Green 0.0 QM 067 A Soffit p Wood Green >9.9 QM
068 A Sof. Sup. Ctr p Wood Green 7.3 QM
Exterior Room 006 Build. 3-5
073 A Door Lft Rgt casing p Metal White -0.l QM 072 A Door Lft U Ctr p Metal White -0.5 QM 070 A Door Ctr Rgt casing p Metal Green -0.l QM
071 A Railing Ctr Railing p Metal Green 0 .2 QM
074 A Compactor Lft p Metal Gray -0.3 QM
075 B Door Ctr u Ctr p Metal Lt. Blue -0 .1 QM
076 c Door Ctr u Ctr p Metal Lt. Blue -0.l QM
Exterior Room 007 Build. 3-7
082 c Wall u Ctr I Metal Gray 0.0 QM 083 c Corner board Lft p Metal Gray -0.6 QM
084 D Door Lft Lft casing p Metal Gray -0 .2 QM
085 D Door Lft Lft casing p Wood Blue -0.2 QM
Exterior Room 008 Build. 3-6
097 A Door Lft Lft casing p Wood Lt.Gree.n -0.4 QM
096 A Door Rgt Lft casing p Metal Lt.Green 0.0 QM
095 A Railing Rgt Railing p Metal Gray -0.l QM
093 D Door Rgt Lft casing p wood Lt.Green -0.4 QM
094 D Door Rgt Lft casing p Brick Lt.Green -0.4 QM
Interior Room 001 Building l
020 B Wall L Ctr p Drywall Blue -0.4 QM 017 B Wall L Rgt I Wood Lt. Blue -0.4 QM 018 B Baseboard Ctr I Wood Dk. Blue -0.3 QM
019 B Door Ctr U Ctr I Wood White -0.3 QM
021 B Elec. Panel Ctr I Wood Tan -0.3 QM
016 B Beam Rgt I Metal Red -0.l QM
025 c Bumper Ctr I Metal Yellow -0.l QM 022 c Equipment Rgt I Metal Green -0.3 QM
023 D Equipment Ctr I Metal Green -0.2 QM
024 D Cat Walk Ctr I Metal Yellow 0.1 QM
026 D Blender Ctr I Metal White -0.l QM
Interior Room 002 1-Foyer
037 A Wall u Ctr I Drywall Wallpapr 0.0 QM
038 A Chair rail Ctr I Wood Pink -0.1 QM
039 A Chair rail Ctr I Wood White -0.1 QM
043 A Window Ctr sash p Wood Gray 4.4 QM
044 A Window Ctr Sill p Wood Gray -0.1 QM
042 A Window Ctr Lft casing p Wood Gray 0 .0 QM
104 B Wall L Ctr p Brick Blue 1. 0 QM
2
DETAILED REPORT OF LEAD PAINT INSPECTION FOR: Mid-Atlantic Associates
Reading Paint Lead No. Wall Structure Location Member Cond Substrate Color (mg/cm2) Mode
040 B Closet Ctr Door I Wood White -0.3 QM
041 B Closet Ctr Door Casing I Wood White 0.0 QM 105 c Wall L Ctr p Brick White 0.2 QM 107 c Wall L Ctr p Drywall Blue -0.1 QM 106 c Wall u Ctr p Brick Green 0.2 QM 108 c Door Ctr Lft casing p Wood Blue 0.5 QM 109 c Door Ctr U Ctr p Wood Blue -0.3 QM 111 c Stairs Lft Risers p Wood Blue -0.1 QM 110 c Stairs Rgt Wall p Wood Blue -0.1 QM
045 D Door Rgt Lft casing p Wood Gray 0.0 QM
046 D Door Rgt Lft jamb p Wood Gray -0.2 QM
Interior Room 003 1-Manu.
112 A Wall L Ctr p Brick Lt. Blue -0.l QM 121 A Wall L Ctr p Brick Blue 0.5 QM
113 A Baseboard Ctr I Brick Dk. Blue -0 .1 QM 114 A Posts Ctr p Brick Dk. Blue 6 .7 QM 116 A Equipment Ctr p Metal Green 0.4 QM
117 A Equipment Ctr I Metal Gray 0 .4 QM
118 A Post Ctr I Metal Blue -0.1 QM
115 B Wall L Lft I Brick Lt. Blue -0 .2 QM
119 c Ceiling p Wood White -0.1 QM
120 c Beam Ctr p wood White 0.0 QM
Interior Room 004 1-Chiller
122 A Railing Rgt Railing I Metal Yellow 1.0 QM
123 B Wall L Lft p Brick Blue 0.2 QM
125 c Post Ctr I Metal Blue -0.2 QM
124 D Ductwork Rgt I Metal Blue 0.0 QM
Interior Room 005 2nd-Man.
132 A Wall L Ctr p Brick White 0.6 QM 131 A Wall u Ctr p Brick Lt. Blue -0.1 QM
128 A Ceiling I Wood White -0.4 QM 133 A Stairs Ctr Treads p Concrete Blue -0.4 QM
127 A Railing Ctr Railing p Wood Blue 0.0 QM
135 A Post Ctr p Wood Blue 4.1 QM 126 A Beam Rgt I Metal Blue 0.0 QM
130 B Sliding Dr. Lft p Metal Blue 2.1 QM 134 c Wall L Ctr p Wood Lt. Blue -0.1 QM
136 c Elevator Lft p Metal Blue -0.2 QM 137 c Pipe Lft p Metal Red -0.6 QM
Interior Room 006 2nd-Baths
138 c Wall L Ctr p Ceramic White -0.3 QM
139 c Floor p Ceramic Gray -0.1 QM
129 c Door Rgt U Ctr I Wood Blue -0.2 QM
Interior Room 007 Build. 3-5
140 c Beam Ctr I Metal Wh.ite -0.1 QM
Interior Room 008 Basement
142 B Wal l L Ctr p Brick Blue 0.0 QM
143 B Door Ctr U Ctr p Metal Blue 3 .8 QM
141 B Stairs Ctr Stringer I Metal Black -0 .1 QM
147 c Window Ctr Sash p Metal Gray 5 .1 QM
146 c Window Ctr Lft casing p Metal Gray 9.6 QM
3
DETAILED REPORT OF LEAD PAINT INSPECTION FOR: Mid-Atlantic Associates
Reading Paint Lead
No. Wall Structure Location Member Cond Substrate Color (mg/cm2) Mode
148 c Door Ctr Lft casing p Wood Green -0.3 QM 144 c Beam Ctr I Metal Blue -0.1 QM 145 c Beam Ctr I Metal Red -0.1 QM
Calibration Readings
001 1.0 QM 002 1. 0 QM 003 1. 0 QM 004 0 .2 QM 005 -0.2 QM 006 o.o QM 098 1. 0 QM 099 1. 0 QM 100 1 .0 QM 101 0.0 QM
102 -0.1 QM 103 0.0 QM 149 1. 0 QM 150 1.0 QM 151 1.0 QM
152 0.3 QM
153 -0.2 QM
154 0.0 QM
----End of Readings----
4
DISTRIBUTION REPORT OF LEAD PAINT INSPECTION FOR: Mid-Atlantic Associates
Inspection Date: 08/18/16 Former Glen Raven Mill
Report Date: 8/22/2016 800 Manning Street
Abatement Level : 1.0 Kinston, NC
Report No. 08/18/16 09:57
Total Reading Sets: 136
Job Started: 08/18/16 09:57
Job Finished: 08/18/16 17:01
----···-------Structure Distribution ------------
Structure Total Positive Negative Inconclusive
A/C 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Air Comp. 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Baseboard 2 0 <0%> 2 <100%> 0 <0%>
Beam 6 0 <0%> 6 <100%> 0 <0%>
Blender 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Bollard 2 0 <0%> 2 <100%> 0 <0%>
Bumper 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Cat Walk 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Ceiling 2 0 <0%> 2 <100%> 0 <0%>
Chair rail 2 0 <0%> 2 <100%> 0 <0%>
Chiller l 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Closet Door 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Closet Door Casing l 0 <0%> l <100%> 0 <0%>
Compactor 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Corner board 2 1 <50%> 1 <50%> 0 <0%>
Crawl case 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Crawl Door 2 0 <0%> 2 <100%> 0 <0%>
Crawl Vent 1 0 <0%> l <100%> 0 <0%>
Door Lft casing 11 0 <0%> 11 <100%> 0 <0%>
Door Lft jamb 2 0 <0%> 2 <100%> 0 <0%>
Door Rgt casing 6 0 <0%> 6 <100%> 0 <0%>
Door U Ctr 15 1 <7%> 14 <93%> 0 <0%>
Downspout l 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Ductwork l 0 <0%> l <100%> 0 <0%>
Elec. Panel 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Elevator 1 0 <0%> l <100%> 0 <0%>
Equipment 4 0 <0%> 4 <100%> 0 <0%>
Fascia 2 l <50%> 1 <50%> 0 <0%>
Floor 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Foundation l 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Panel l 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Pipe 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Porch Floor 2 0 <0%> 2 <100%> 0 <0%>
Porch Post 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Post 3 1 <33%> 2 <67%> 0 <0%>
Posts 1 l <100%> 0 <0%> 0 <0%>
Railing Railing 5 1 <20%> 4 <80%> 0 <0%>
Safety Box 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Shelter l 0 <0%> l <100%> 0 <0%>
Sliding Dr. l 1 <100%> 0 <0%> 0 <0%>
Sof. Sup. 1 1 <100%> 0 <0%> 0 <0%>
Soffit 2 2 <100%> 0 <0%> 0 <0%>
Stairs Risers l 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Stairs Stringer 4 0 <0%> 4 <100%> 0 <0%>
Stairs Treads 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Stairs Wall 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Threshold 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Wall 21 1 <5%> 20 <95%> 0 <0%>
Win.Insert 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%>
Window Lft casing 4 2 <50%> 2 <50%> 0 <0%>
Window Rgt casing 1 0 <0%> 1 <100%> 0 <0%> Window Sash 3 3 <100%> 0 <0%> 0 <0%>
Window Sill 3 0 <0%> 3 <100%> 0 <0%>
DISTRIBUTION REPORT OF LEAD PAINT INSPECTION FOR: Mid-Atlantic Associates
Inspection Totals: 136 16 < 12%> 120 < 88%>
1
0 < 0%>
Report of Survey to Identify August 23, 2016
Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Page 8
800 Manning Street
Matrix Job No. 160850
Report of Survey to Identify August 23, 2016
Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Page 9
800 Manning Street
Matrix Job No. 160850
Report of Survey to Identify August 23, 2016
Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Page 10
800 Manning Street
Matrix Job No. 160850
Report of Survey to Identify August 23, 2016
Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Page 11
800 Manning Street
Matrix Job No. 160850
Report of Survey to Identify August 23, 2016
Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Page 12
800 Manning Street
Matrix Job No. 160850
Report of Survey to Identify August 23, 2016
Asbestos-Containing Materials and Lead-Based Paints Page 13
800 Manning Street
Matrix Job No. 160850
APPENDIX E
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS
AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDS
Mid Atlantic
Engineering & Environmental Solutions
Page 1 of 56
Page 2 of 56
Page 3 of 56
Page 4 of 56
Page 5 of 56
Page 6 of 56
Page 7 of 56
Page 8 of 56
Page 9 of 56
Page 10 of 56
Page 11 of 56
Page 12 of 56
Page 13 of 56
Page 14 of 56
Page 15 of 56
Page 16 of 56
Page 17 of 56
Page 18 of 56
Page 19 of 56
Page 20 of 56
Page 21 of 56
Page 22 of 56
Page 23 of 56
Page 24 of 56
Page 25 of 56
Page 26 of 56
Page 27 of 56
Page 28 of 56
Page 29 of 56
Page 30 of 56
Page 31 of 56
Page 32 of 56
Page 33 of 56
Page 34 of 56
Page 35 of 56
Page 36 of 56
Page 37 of 56
Page 38 of 56
Page 39 of 56
Page 40 of 56
Page 41 of 56
Page 42 of 56
Page 43 of 56
Page 44 of 56
Page 45 of 56
Page 46 of 56
Page 47 of 56
Page 48 of 56
Page 49 of 56
Page 50 of 56
Page 51 of 56
Page 52 of 56
Page 53 of 56
Page 54 of 56
Page 55 of 56
Page 56 of 56
R
E
C
O
R
D

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e
:

S
h
o
r
t

H
o
i
d

A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
:

(
Y
e
s
)

(
N
o
)

U
S
T

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:

(
Y
e
s
)

(
N
O
)

*
P
l
e
a
s
e

A
T
T
A
C
H

a
n
y

p
r
o
j
e
c
t

s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c

r
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g

(
Q
C

L
E
V
E
L

1
1
1

m

I
V
)

p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s

a
n
d
/
o
r

Q
C

R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s

l
n
v
o
i
c
e
T
o
:

_
_
_

~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
-
~
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
A
d
d
r
e
s
s
:

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
~
-
-
-
~
-
P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e

O
r
d
e
r

N
o
.
/
B
i
l
l
i
n
g

R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_

_

R
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d

D
u
e

D
a
t
e

D

1

D
a
y

D

2

D
a
y
s

D

3

D
a
y
s

D

4

D
a
y
s

D

5

D
a
y
s

"
W
o
r
k
i
n
g

D
a
y
s
"

D

6
-
9

D
a
y
s

~
~
t
a
n
d
a
r
d

1
0

d
a
y
s

D

R
u
s
h

W
o
r
k

M
u
s
t

B
e

T
O

B
E

F
I
L
L
E
D

I
N

B
Y

C
L
I
E
N
T
/
S
A
M
P
L
I
N
G

P
E
R
S
O
N
N
E
L

C
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:

N
E
L
A
C

_
_

D
o
D

_
_

F
l

_
_

Site location Name: w:zr, ,,._, , ·;
T

-
P
r
e
-
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d

S
a
m
p
l
e
s

r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d

a
f
t
e
r

1
4
:
0
0

w
i
l
l

b
e

p
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
d

n
e
x
t

b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s

d
a
y
.

S
C

_
_

O
T
I
I
-
I
E
R

N
I
A
.

_
_

_

Site location Physical Adokess: "'=' '"h' ,
,
,

,

.

T
u
r
n
a
r
o
u
n
d

t
i
m
e

i
s

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s

d
a
y
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s

a
n
d

h
o
l
i
d
a
y
s
.

(
S
E
E

R
E
V
E
R
S
E

F
O
R

T
E
R
M
S

&

C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
S

R
E
G
A
R
D
I
N
G

S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S

R
E
N
D
E
R
E
D

B
Y

P
R
I
S
M

L
A
B
O
R
A
T
O
R
I
E
S
,

I
N
C
.

T
O

C
L
I
E
N
T
)

W
a
t
e
r

C
h
l
o
r
i
n
a
t
e
d
:

Y
E
S
_

N
O

A

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
c
e
d

U
p
o
n

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
:

N
O
_

CLIENT SAMPLE DESCRIPTION DATE COLLECTED
T
I
M
E

COL
L
E
C
T
E
D

MI
L
I
T
A
R
Y

H
O
U
R
S

M
A
T
R
I
X

(
S
O
i
l
,

W
A
T
E
R

O
R

S
L
U
D
G
E
)

S
A
M
P
L
E

C
O
N
T
A
I
N
E
R

P
R
E
S
E
R
V
A
·

T
I
V
E
S

A
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S

R
E
~
E
S
T
E
D

Sampler's Signature
*
T
Y
P
E

S
E
E

B
E
L
O
W

·
s
a
m
p
l
e
d

B
y

(
P
r
i
n
t

N
a
m
e
)

N
O
.

S
I
Z
E

A
f
f
i
l
i
a
t
i
o
n

I.Jpon relinquishing, this Chain of Custody is
y
o
u
r

a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n

f
o
r

P
r
i
s
m

t
o

p
r
o
c
e
e
d

w
i
t
h

t
h
e

a
n
a
l
y
s
e
s

a
s

r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d

a
b
o
v
e
.

A
n
y

c
h
a
n
g
e
s

m
u
s
t

b
e

submitted in writing to the Prism Project Ma
n
a
g
e
r
.

T
h
e
r
e

w
i
l
l

b
e

c
h
a
r
g
e
s

f
o
r

a
n
y

c
h
a
n
g
e
s

a
f
t
e
r

a
n
a
l
y
s
e
s

h
a
v
e

b
e
e
n

i
n
i
t
i
a
l
i
z
e
d
.

h ..... ....l D,,, fc,.;"~"i.,~,,.\
o
,
,
.
,
,
.
,
.
.
.
;
,
,
,
,
.
'
°
"
1
2
1
,
,
.

/
0
1

...
.
.

.
-
.

..
.
.
.

.
i
.
,
,
~
,
,
.
\

Method ol Shipment NOTE: ALL SAMPLECOOLERS SH
O
U
L
D

B
E

T
A
P
E
D

S
H
U
T

W
.
}
l
j
l
·
C
U
S
r
o
i
:
I
Y

S
E
A
L
S

F
O
R

T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
T
O

T
H
E

L
A
B
O
R
A
T
O
R
Y
.

SAMPLES ARE NOT ACCEPTED A
N
D

V
E
R
I
F
I
E
D

A
G
A
I
N
S
T
,
,
(
!
°
J
)
'
C

U
N
T
I
L

R
E
C
E
I
V
E
D

A
T

T
H
E

L
A
B
O
R
A
T
O
R
Y
.

1
/

O Fed Ex O UPS D Hand-delivered O Prism Field S
e
r
v
i
c
e

O

O
t
h
e
r

NPDES: 11.JST: I GROUNDWAT
E
R
:

I

D
R
I
N
K
I
N
G

W
A
.
T
I
E
R
:

I

S
O
L
I
D

W
A
S
T
E
:

I

R
C
R
A
:

I

C
E
R
C
L
A

I

L
A
N
D
F
I
L
L

I

O
T
H
E
R
:

D NC D SC D NC D SC D NC D SC
D

N
C

D

S
C

D

N
C

D

S
C

D

N
C

D

S
C

O

N
C

D

S
C

D

N
C

D

S
C

D

N
C

O

S
C

D D D
D

D

O

D

D

O

_
_

_

*CONTAINER TYPE CODIES: A= Amber
C

=

C
l
e
a
r

G
=

G
l
a
s
s

P

=

P
l
a
s
t
i
c
;

T
L
=

T
e
f
l
o
n
-
L
i
n
e
d

C
a
p

V
O
A
=

V
o
l
a
t
i
l
e

O
r
g
a
n
i
c
s

A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s

(
Z
e
r
o

H
e
a
d

S
p
a
c
e
)

R
E
M
A
R
K
S

A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l

C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
:

P
R
I
S
M

L
A
B

I
D
N
O
.

O
J

0
1

0
1

Page 1 of 50
Page 2 of 50
Page 3 of 50
Page 4 of 50
Page 5 of 50
Page 6 of 50
Page 7 of 50
Page 8 of 50
Page 9 of 50
Page 10 of 50
Page 11 of 50
Page 12 of 50
Page 13 of 50
Page 14 of 50
Page 15 of 50
Page 16 of 50
Page 17 of 50
Page 18 of 50
Page 19 of 50
Page 20 of 50
Page 21 of 50
Page 22 of 50
Page 23 of 50
Page 24 of 50
Page 25 of 50
Page 26 of 50
Page 27 of 50
Page 28 of 50
Page 29 of 50
Page 30 of 50
Page 31 of 50
Page 32 of 50
Page 33 of 50
Page 34 of 50
Page 35 of 50
Page 36 of 50
Page 37 of 50
Page 38 of 50
Page 39 of 50
Page 40 of 50
Page 41 of 50
Page 42 of 50
Page 43 of 50
Page 44 of 50
Page 45 of 50
Page 46 of 50
Page 47 of 50
Page 48 of 50
Page 49 of 50
Page 50 of 50
N

C
U
S
T
O
D
Y

R
E
C
O
R
D

!
P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
a
m
e
:

,

-
·

,
.

"

S
h
o
r
t

H
o
l
d

A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
:

(
Y
e
s
)

(
N
o
)

U
S
T

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:

(
Y
e
s
)

(
N
O
)

*
P
l
e
a
s
e

A
T
T
A
C
H

a
n
y

p
r
o
j
e
c
t

s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c

r
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g

(
Q
C

L
E
V
E
L

1
1
1

m

I
V
)

p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s

a
n
d
/
o
r

Q
C

R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s

I
n
v
o
i
c
e

T
o
:

_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_

_

A
d
d
r
e
s
s
:

P
u
r
c
h
a
s
e

O
r
d
e
r

N
o
.
/
l
B
i
l
l
i
n
g

R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_

_

T
O

B
I
E

f
'
l
l
L
E
D

I
N

B
Y

C
L
I
E
N
T
/
S
A
M
P
L
I
N
G

P
E
R
S
O
N
N
E
L

R
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d

D
u
e

D
a
t
e

D

1

D
a
y

D

2

D
a
y
s

D

3

D
a
y
s

D

4

D
a
y
s

D

5

D
a
y
s

C
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
:

N
E
L
A
C

_
_

D
o
D

_
_

F
l

_
_

Site location Name:
-
-
.

,

"
W
o
r
k
i
n
g

D
a
y
s
"

D

6
-
9

D
a
y
s

l
'
i
l
¢
'
~
f
t
a
n
d
a
r
d

1
0

d
a
y
s

o

R
u
s
h

W
o
r
k

M
u
s
t

B
e

"
"
'
,
;

P
r
e
-
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d

S
a
m
p
l
e
s

r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d

a
f
t
e
r

1
4
:
0
0

w
i
l
l

b
e

p
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
d

n
e
x
t

b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s

d
a
y
.

S
C

_
_

O
T
H
E
R

N
I
A
.

_
_

_

Site locatirrm !Physical Address: i::(,'l'l2
h
>
,

0
v
(
:
,

T
u
r
n
a
r
o
u
n
d

t
i
m
e

i
s

b
a
s
e
d

o
n

b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s

d
a
y
s
,

e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g

w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s

a
n
d

h
o
l
i
d
a
y
s
.

(
S
E
E

R
E
V
E
R
S
E

F
O
R

T
E
R
M
S

&

C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
S

R
E
G
A
R
D
I
N
G

S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S

W
a
t
e
r

C
h
l
o
r
i
n
a
t
e
d
:

Y
E
S

N
O

>
O

R
E
N
D
E
R
E
D

B
Y

P
R
I
S
M

L
A
B
O
R
A
T
O
R
I
E
S
,

I
N
C
.

T
O

C
L
I
E
N
T
)

S
a
m
p
l
e

I
c
e
d

U
p
o
n

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
:

Y
E
S
~
N
O
_

CLIENT SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sampler's DATE COLLECTED
T
I
M
E

CO
L
L
E
C
T
E
D

M
I
L
I
T
A
R
Y

H
O
U
R
S

M
A
T
R
I
X

(
S
O
I
L
,

W
A
T
E
R

O
R

S
L
U
D
G
E
)

S
A
M
P
L
E

C
O
N
T
A
I
N
E
R

*
T
Y
P
E

S
E
E

B
E
L
O
W

S
a
m
p
l
e
d

B
y

(
P
r
i
n
t

N
a
m
e
)

N
O
.

S
I
Z
E

P
R
E
S
E
R
V
A
-
T
I
V
E
S

A
f
f
i
l
i
a
t
i
o
n

llp!m rnlinquishing, this Chain of Custody is

y
o
u
r

a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n

f
o
r

P
r
i
s
m

t
o

p
r
o
c
e
e
d

w
i
t
h

t
h
e

a
n
a
l
y
s
e
s

a
s

r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d

a
b
o
v
e
.

A
n
y

c
h
a
n
g
e
s

m
u
s
t

b
e

submitted in writing to the Prism Project Ma
n
a
g
e
r
.

T
h
e
m

w
i
l
l

b
e

c
h
a
r
g
e
s

f
o
r

a
n
y

c
h
a
n
g
e
s

a
f
t
e
r

a
n
a
l
y
s
e
s

h
a
v
e

b
e
e
n

i
n
i
t
i
a
l
i
z
e
d

.

...... ,. . ' ' ..... ,......
.
.
.
.
.
.

'
~

'

.
.
.
.
.

,
,
.
.
,
,

-
Method of Shipment: NOTE: ALL SAMPLE COOLERS S
H
O
U
L
D

B
E

T
A
P
E
D

S
H
U
H
1
1
p
'
l
'
F
r
e
i
.
J
S
T
O
D
Y

S
E
A
L
S

F
O
R

T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N

T
O

T
H
E

L
A
B
O
R
A
T
O
R
Y
.

SAMPLES ARE NOT ACCEPTED
A
N
D

V
E
R
I
F
I
E
D

A
G
A
I
N
S
T
,
C
:
,
9
C
U
N
T
I
L

R
E
C
E
I
V
E
D

A
T

T
H
E

L
A
B
O
R
A
T
O
R
Y
.

/
'

D Fed Ex D UPS D Hand-delivered D Prism Field
S
e
r
v
i
c
e

D

o
t
h
e
r

NIPDIES: I llST: I GROUNDWAT
E
R
:

I

D
R
I
N
K
I
N
G

W
A
T
E
R
:

I

S
O
L
I
D

W
A
S
T
E
:

I

R
C
R
A
:

I

C
E
R
C
L
A

I

L
A
N
D
F
I
L
L

I

O
T
H
E
R
:

O NC D SC D NC D SC O NC D SC
O

N
C

O

S
C

O

N
C

D

S
C

O

N
C

O

S
C

O

N
C

O

S
C

O

N
C

O

S
C

D

N
C

O

S
C

O D D
O

O

D

O

O

O

_
_

_

*CONTAINER TYPE CODES: A= Amber
C

=

C
l
e
a
r

G
=

G
l
a
s
s

P

=

P
l
a
s
t
i
c
;

T
L
=

T
e
f
l
o
n
-
L
i
n
e
d

C
a
p

V
O
A
=

V
o
l
a
t
i
l
e

O
r
g
a
n
i
c
s

A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s

(
Z
e
r
o

H
e
a
d

S
p
a
c
e
)

R
E
M
A
R
K
S

A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l

C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
:

P
R
I
S
M

L
A
B

I
D
N
O
.

0

~

J
f

J
\
o

~

Mid-Atlantic Associates
Raleigh, NC 27610
409 Rogers View Court
Mr. Kelly Johnson
Enclosed is the analytical report for the above referenced project. The data herein applies to
samples as received by H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc. on 24-Aug-16 which were analyzed in
accordance with the attached Chain of Custody record(s).
The results for all sample analyses and required QA/QC analyses are presented in the following
sections and summarized in the documents:
• Sample Summary
• Case Narrative (if applicable)
• Sample Results
• Quality Control Summary
• Notes and Definitions / Appendix
• Chain of Custody
• Sampling Logs (if applicable)
Unless otherwise noted, I certify that all analyses were performed and reviewed in compliance with
our Quality Systems Manual and Standard Operating Procedures. This report shall not be
reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc.
We at H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc. sincerely appreciate the opportunity to provide analytical
services to you on this project. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this analytical report,
please contact me at your convenience at 760-804-9678.
Sincerely,
30 August 2016
Janis La Roux
Laboratory Director
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc. is certified under the California ELAP, the National Environmental
Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) and the Department of Defense Accreditation Programs.
Client Project: R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
H&P Project: MAA082416-11
Dear Mr. Kelly Johnson:
P 1.800.834.9888 / 760.804.9678 F 760.804.9159 W handpmg.com
2470 Impala Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92010 & Field Office - Signal Hill, CAQuality. Accuracy. Experience.
Geochemistry Inc.Mobile
Page 1 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled
ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES
Date Received
VP-1 E608096-01 Vapor 19-Aug-16 24-Aug-16
VP-2 E608096-02 Vapor 19-Aug-16 24-Aug-16
VP-3 E608096-03 Vapor 19-Aug-16 24-Aug-16
VP-4 E608096-04 Vapor 19-Aug-16 24-Aug-16
VP-5 E608096-05 Vapor 19-Aug-16 24-Aug-16
VP-6 E608096-06 Vapor 19-Aug-16 24-Aug-16
Duplicate E608096-07 Vapor 19-Aug-16 24-Aug-16
Page 2 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
DETECTIONS SUMMARY
Sample ID:Laboratory ID:
Analyte Result Limit Units Method
E608096-01VP-1
Notes
Reporting
Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)12 2.3 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
2-Butanone (MEK)6.2 2.4 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Benzene 1.0 0.6 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Toluene 7.0 3.1 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
m,p-Xylene 5.1 1.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.0 2.0 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Sample ID:Laboratory ID:
Analyte Result Limit Units Method
E608096-02VP-2
Notes
Reporting
Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)8.2 2.3 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
2-Butanone (MEK)7.2 2.4 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Benzene 2.0 0.6 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Trichloroethene 4.2 2.2 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)4.5 3.3 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Toluene 13 3.1 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Tetrachloroethene 2.9 2.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Ethylbenzene 2.4 1.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
m,p-Xylene 8.7 1.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Styrene 5.3 1.7 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
o-Xylene 4.1 1.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 3.3 2.0 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3.5 2.4 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Sample ID:Laboratory ID:
Analyte Result Limit Units Method
E608096-03VP-3
Notes
Reporting
Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12)4.0 4.0 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Chloromethane 3.2 0.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)20 2.3 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)2.0 1.4 ug/m3 EPA TO-15 QL-1H
Carbon disulfide 3.0 1.3 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
2-Butanone (MEK)9.0 2.4 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 15 2.2 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Benzene 4.7 0.6 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)3.8 3.3 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Toluene 20 3.1 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Page 3 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Sample ID:Laboratory ID:
Analyte Result Limit Units Method
E608096-03VP-3
Notes
Reporting
Tetrachloroethene 3.9 2.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Ethylbenzene 4.0 1.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
m,p-Xylene 14 1.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Styrene 12 1.7 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
o-Xylene 5.5 1.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5.5 2.0 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3.2 2.4 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Sample ID:Laboratory ID:
Analyte Result Limit Units Method
E608096-04VP-4
Notes
Reporting
Chloromethane 1.8 0.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)64 2.3 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)8.3 1.4 ug/m3 EPA TO-15 QL-1H
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.3 1.6 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
2-Butanone (MEK)43 2.4 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.4 1.6 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.4 2.2 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Benzene 1.4 0.6 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Trichloroethene 6.5 2.2 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)4.2 3.3 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Toluene 3.6 3.1 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Tetrachloroethene 7.2 2.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Ethylbenzene 2.5 1.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
m,p-Xylene 5.0 1.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Sample ID:Laboratory ID:
Analyte Result Limit Units Method
E608096-05VP-5
Notes
Reporting
Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)24 2.3 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
2-Butanone (MEK)8.2 2.4 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Chloroform 1.7 1.0 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Benzene 2.3 0.6 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Toluene 5.2 3.1 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Tetrachloroethene 5.0 2.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
m,p-Xylene 3.1 1.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Page 4 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Sample ID:Laboratory ID:
Analyte Result Limit Units Method
E608096-06VP-6
Notes
Reporting
Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12)18 4.0 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)64 2.3 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Carbon disulfide 3.9 1.3 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
2-Butanone (MEK)5.7 2.4 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Benzene 2.5 0.6 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Toluene 13 3.1 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Ethylbenzene 2.9 1.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
m,p-Xylene 11 1.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Styrene 6.3 1.7 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
o-Xylene 3.8 1.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 4.4 2.0 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3.2 2.4 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Sample ID:Laboratory ID:
Analyte Result Limit Units Method
E608096-07Duplicate
Notes
Reporting
Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)28 2.3 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Carbon disulfide 2.3 1.3 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
2-Butanone (MEK)7.4 2.4 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.8 1.6 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Chloroform 1.7 1.0 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Benzene 1.8 0.6 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Trichloroethene 12 2.2 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Toluene 4.2 3.1 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Tetrachloroethene 5.2 2.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
m,p-Xylene 2.5 1.8 ug/m3 EPA TO-15
Page 5 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA TO-15
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc.
Result Analyte Limit
Reporting
Units
Dilution
Batch Prepared Analyzed Method
Notes Factor
VP-1 (E608096-01) Vapor Sampled: 19-Aug-16 Received: 24-Aug-16
EPA TO-1525-Aug-16 26-Aug-16ug/m3 EH626011Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12)4.0ND
""""""Chloromethane 0.8ND
""""""Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (F114)2.8ND
""""""Vinyl chloride 0.5ND
""""""Bromomethane 1.6ND
""""""Chloroethane 1.1ND
"""""Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)"2.312
""""""1,1-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (F113)3.1ND
""""""Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)1.4ND
""""""Carbon disulfide 1.3ND
""""""trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""1,1-Dichloroethane 1.6ND
"""""2-Butanone (MEK)"2.46.2
""""""cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""Chloroform 1.0ND
""""""1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.2ND
""""""1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)1.6ND
"""""Benzene "0.61.0
""""""Carbon tetrachloride 1.3ND
""""""Trichloroethene 2.2ND
""""""1,2-Dichloropropane 1.9ND
""""""Bromodichloromethane 2.7ND
""""""cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.8ND
""""""4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)3.3ND
""""""trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.8ND
"""""Toluene "3.17.0
""""""1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2.2ND
""""""2-Hexanone (MBK)3.3ND
""""""Dibromochloromethane 3.5ND
""""""Tetrachloroethene 2.8ND
""""""1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)3.1ND
""""""1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8ND
""""""Chlorobenzene 1.9ND
""""""Ethylbenzene 1.8ND
"""""m,p-Xylene "1.85.1
""""""Styrene 1.7ND
""""""o-Xylene 1.8ND
Page 6 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA TO-15
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc.
Result Analyte Limit
Reporting
Units
Dilution
Batch Prepared Analyzed Method
Notes Factor
VP-1 (E608096-01) Vapor Sampled: 19-Aug-16 Received: 24-Aug-16
EPA TO-1525-Aug-16 26-Aug-16ug/m3 EH626011Bromoform4.2ND
""""""1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8ND
""""""4-Ethyltoluene 2.0ND
""""""1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 2.0ND
"""""1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene "2.02.0
""""""1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
""""""1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
""""""1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
""""""1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7.5ND
""""""Hexachlorobutadiene 11ND
""""114 % 76-134Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
""""102 % 78-125Surrogate: Toluene-d8
""""93.8 % 77-127Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
VP-2 (E608096-02) Vapor Sampled: 19-Aug-16 Received: 24-Aug-16
EPA TO-1525-Aug-16 26-Aug-16ug/m3 EH626011Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12)4.0ND
""""""Chloromethane 0.8ND
""""""Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (F114)2.8ND
""""""Vinyl chloride 0.5ND
""""""Bromomethane 1.6ND
""""""Chloroethane 1.1ND
"""""Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)"2.38.2
""""""1,1-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (F113)3.1ND
""""""Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)1.4ND
""""""Carbon disulfide 1.3ND
""""""trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""1,1-Dichloroethane 1.6ND
"""""2-Butanone (MEK)"2.47.2
""""""cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""Chloroform 1.0ND
""""""1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.2ND
""""""1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)1.6ND
"""""Benzene "0.62.0
""""""Carbon tetrachloride 1.3ND
"""""Trichloroethene "2.24.2
""""""1,2-Dichloropropane 1.9ND
Page 7 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA TO-15
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc.
Result Analyte Limit
Reporting
Units
Dilution
Batch Prepared Analyzed Method
Notes Factor
VP-2 (E608096-02) Vapor Sampled: 19-Aug-16 Received: 24-Aug-16
EPA TO-1525-Aug-16 26-Aug-16ug/m3 EH626011Bromodichloromethane2.7ND
""""""cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.8ND
"""""4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)"3.34.5
""""""trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.8ND
"""""Toluene "3.113
""""""1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2.2ND
""""""2-Hexanone (MBK)3.3ND
""""""Dibromochloromethane 3.5ND
"""""Tetrachloroethene "2.82.9
""""""1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)3.1ND
""""""1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8ND
""""""Chlorobenzene 1.9ND
"""""Ethylbenzene "1.82.4
"""""m,p-Xylene "1.88.7
"""""Styrene "1.75.3
"""""o-Xylene "1.84.1
""""""Bromoform 4.2ND
""""""1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8ND
""""""4-Ethyltoluene 2.0ND
""""""1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 2.0ND
"""""1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene "2.03.3
""""""1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
"""""1,4-Dichlorobenzene "2.43.5
""""""1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
""""""1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7.5ND
""""""Hexachlorobutadiene 11ND
""""103 % 76-134Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
""""103 % 78-125Surrogate: Toluene-d8
""""93.8 % 77-127Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Page 8 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA TO-15
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc.
Result Analyte Limit
Reporting
Units
Dilution
Batch Prepared Analyzed Method
Notes Factor
VP-3 (E608096-03) Vapor Sampled: 19-Aug-16 Received: 24-Aug-16
EH62601 25-Aug-16 26-Aug-16ug/m3 1Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12)EPA TO-154.04.0
"""""Chloromethane "0.83.2
""""""Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (F114)2.8ND
""""""Vinyl chloride 0.5ND
""""""Bromomethane 1.6ND
""""""Chloroethane 1.1ND
"""""Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)"2.320
""""""1,1-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (F113)3.1ND
"""""Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)QL-1H"1.42.0
"""""Carbon disulfide "1.33.0
""""""trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""1,1-Dichloroethane 1.6ND
"""""2-Butanone (MEK)"2.49.0
""""""cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""Chloroform 1.0ND
"""""1,1,1-Trichloroethane "2.215
""""""1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)1.6ND
"""""Benzene "0.64.7
""""""Carbon tetrachloride 1.3ND
""""""Trichloroethene 2.2ND
""""""1,2-Dichloropropane 1.9ND
""""""Bromodichloromethane 2.7ND
""""""cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.8ND
"""""4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)"3.33.8
""""""trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.8ND
"""""Toluene "3.120
""""""1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2.2ND
""""""2-Hexanone (MBK)3.3ND
""""""Dibromochloromethane 3.5ND
"""""Tetrachloroethene "2.83.9
""""""1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)3.1ND
""""""1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8ND
""""""Chlorobenzene 1.9ND
"""""Ethylbenzene "1.84.0
"""""m,p-Xylene "1.814
"""""Styrene "1.712
"""""o-Xylene "1.85.5
Page 9 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA TO-15
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc.
Result Analyte Limit
Reporting
Units
Dilution
Batch Prepared Analyzed Method
Notes Factor
VP-3 (E608096-03) Vapor Sampled: 19-Aug-16 Received: 24-Aug-16
EPA TO-1525-Aug-16 26-Aug-16ug/m3 EH626011Bromoform4.2ND
""""""1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8ND
""""""4-Ethyltoluene 2.0ND
""""""1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 2.0ND
"""""1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene "2.05.5
""""""1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
"""""1,4-Dichlorobenzene "2.43.2
""""""1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
""""""1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7.5ND
""""""Hexachlorobutadiene 11ND
""""108 % 76-134Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
""""101 % 78-125Surrogate: Toluene-d8
""""95.9 % 77-127Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
VP-4 (E608096-04) Vapor Sampled: 19-Aug-16 Received: 24-Aug-16
EPA TO-1525-Aug-16 26-Aug-16ug/m3 EH626011Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12)4.0ND
"""""Chloromethane "0.81.8
""""""Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (F114)2.8ND
""""""Vinyl chloride 0.5ND
""""""Bromomethane 1.6ND
""""""Chloroethane 1.1ND
"""""Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)"2.364
""""""1,1-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (F113)3.1ND
"""""Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)QL-1H"1.48.3
""""""Carbon disulfide 1.3ND
"""""trans-1,2-Dichloroethene "1.63.3
""""""1,1-Dichloroethane 1.6ND
"""""2-Butanone (MEK)"2.443
"""""cis-1,2-Dichloroethene "1.63.4
""""""Chloroform 1.0ND
"""""1,1,1-Trichloroethane "2.23.4
""""""1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)1.6ND
"""""Benzene "0.61.4
""""""Carbon tetrachloride 1.3ND
"""""Trichloroethene "2.26.5
""""""1,2-Dichloropropane 1.9ND
Page 10 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA TO-15
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc.
Result Analyte Limit
Reporting
Units
Dilution
Batch Prepared Analyzed Method
Notes Factor
VP-4 (E608096-04) Vapor Sampled: 19-Aug-16 Received: 24-Aug-16
EPA TO-1525-Aug-16 26-Aug-16ug/m3 EH626011Bromodichloromethane2.7ND
""""""cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.8ND
"""""4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)"3.34.2
""""""trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.8ND
"""""Toluene "3.13.6
""""""1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2.2ND
""""""2-Hexanone (MBK)3.3ND
""""""Dibromochloromethane 3.5ND
"""""Tetrachloroethene "2.87.2
""""""1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)3.1ND
""""""1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8ND
""""""Chlorobenzene 1.9ND
"""""Ethylbenzene "1.82.5
"""""m,p-Xylene "1.85.0
""""""Styrene 1.7ND
""""""o-Xylene 1.8ND
""""""Bromoform 4.2ND
""""""1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8ND
""""""4-Ethyltoluene 2.0ND
""""""1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 2.0ND
""""""1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.0ND
""""""1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
""""""1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
""""""1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
""""""1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7.5ND
""""""Hexachlorobutadiene 11ND
""""108 % 76-134Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
""""99.7 % 78-125Surrogate: Toluene-d8
""""88.3 % 77-127Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Page 11 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA TO-15
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc.
Result Analyte Limit
Reporting
Units
Dilution
Batch Prepared Analyzed Method
Notes Factor
VP-5 (E608096-05) Vapor Sampled: 19-Aug-16 Received: 24-Aug-16
EPA TO-1525-Aug-16 26-Aug-16ug/m3 EH626011Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12)4.0ND
""""""Chloromethane 0.8ND
""""""Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (F114)2.8ND
""""""Vinyl chloride 0.5ND
""""""Bromomethane 1.6ND
""""""Chloroethane 1.1ND
"""""Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)"2.324
""""""1,1-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (F113)3.1ND
""""""Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)1.4ND
""""""Carbon disulfide 1.3ND
""""""trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""1,1-Dichloroethane 1.6ND
"""""2-Butanone (MEK)"2.48.2
""""""cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
"""""Chloroform "1.01.7
""""""1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.2ND
""""""1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)1.6ND
"""""Benzene "0.62.3
""""""Carbon tetrachloride 1.3ND
""""""Trichloroethene 2.2ND
""""""1,2-Dichloropropane 1.9ND
""""""Bromodichloromethane 2.7ND
""""""cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.8ND
""""""4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)3.3ND
""""""trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.8ND
"""""Toluene "3.15.2
""""""1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2.2ND
""""""2-Hexanone (MBK)3.3ND
""""""Dibromochloromethane 3.5ND
"""""Tetrachloroethene "2.85.0
""""""1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)3.1ND
""""""1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8ND
""""""Chlorobenzene 1.9ND
""""""Ethylbenzene 1.8ND
"""""m,p-Xylene "1.83.1
""""""Styrene 1.7ND
""""""o-Xylene 1.8ND
Page 12 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA TO-15
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc.
Result Analyte Limit
Reporting
Units
Dilution
Batch Prepared Analyzed Method
Notes Factor
VP-5 (E608096-05) Vapor Sampled: 19-Aug-16 Received: 24-Aug-16
EPA TO-1525-Aug-16 26-Aug-16ug/m3 EH626011Bromoform4.2ND
""""""1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8ND
""""""4-Ethyltoluene 2.0ND
""""""1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 2.0ND
""""""1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.0ND
""""""1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
""""""1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
""""""1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
""""""1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7.5ND
""""""Hexachlorobutadiene 11ND
""""115 % 76-134Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
""""103 % 78-125Surrogate: Toluene-d8
""""90.8 % 77-127Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
VP-6 (E608096-06) Vapor Sampled: 19-Aug-16 Received: 24-Aug-16
EH62601 25-Aug-16 26-Aug-16ug/m3 1Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12)EPA TO-154.018
""""""Chloromethane 0.8ND
""""""Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (F114)2.8ND
""""""Vinyl chloride 0.5ND
""""""Bromomethane 1.6ND
""""""Chloroethane 1.1ND
"""""Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)"2.364
""""""1,1-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (F113)3.1ND
""""""Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)1.4ND
"""""Carbon disulfide "1.33.9
""""""trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""1,1-Dichloroethane 1.6ND
"""""2-Butanone (MEK)"2.45.7
""""""cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""Chloroform 1.0ND
""""""1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.2ND
""""""1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)1.6ND
"""""Benzene "0.62.5
""""""Carbon tetrachloride 1.3ND
""""""Trichloroethene 2.2ND
""""""1,2-Dichloropropane 1.9ND
Page 13 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA TO-15
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc.
Result Analyte Limit
Reporting
Units
Dilution
Batch Prepared Analyzed Method
Notes Factor
VP-6 (E608096-06) Vapor Sampled: 19-Aug-16 Received: 24-Aug-16
EPA TO-1525-Aug-16 26-Aug-16ug/m3 EH626011Bromodichloromethane2.7ND
""""""cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.8ND
""""""4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)3.3ND
""""""trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.8ND
"""""Toluene "3.113
""""""1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2.2ND
""""""2-Hexanone (MBK)3.3ND
""""""Dibromochloromethane 3.5ND
""""""Tetrachloroethene 2.8ND
""""""1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)3.1ND
""""""1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8ND
""""""Chlorobenzene 1.9ND
"""""Ethylbenzene "1.82.9
"""""m,p-Xylene "1.811
"""""Styrene "1.76.3
"""""o-Xylene "1.83.8
""""""Bromoform 4.2ND
""""""1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8ND
""""""4-Ethyltoluene 2.0ND
""""""1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 2.0ND
"""""1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene "2.04.4
""""""1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
"""""1,4-Dichlorobenzene "2.43.2
""""""1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
""""""1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7.5ND
""""""Hexachlorobutadiene 11ND
""""111 % 76-134Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
""""102 % 78-125Surrogate: Toluene-d8
""""93.7 % 77-127Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Page 14 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA TO-15
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc.
Result Analyte Limit
Reporting
Units
Dilution
Batch Prepared Analyzed Method
Notes Factor
Duplicate (E608096-07) Vapor Sampled: 19-Aug-16 Received: 24-Aug-16
EPA TO-1525-Aug-16 26-Aug-16ug/m3 EH626011Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12)4.0ND
""""""Chloromethane 0.8ND
""""""Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (F114)2.8ND
""""""Vinyl chloride 0.5ND
""""""Bromomethane 1.6ND
""""""Chloroethane 1.1ND
"""""Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)"2.328
""""""1,1-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (F113)3.1ND
""""""Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)1.4ND
"""""Carbon disulfide "1.32.3
""""""trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.6ND
""""""1,1-Dichloroethane 1.6ND
"""""2-Butanone (MEK)"2.47.4
"""""cis-1,2-Dichloroethene "1.61.8
"""""Chloroform "1.01.7
""""""1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.2ND
""""""1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)1.6ND
"""""Benzene "0.61.8
""""""Carbon tetrachloride 1.3ND
"""""Trichloroethene "2.212
""""""1,2-Dichloropropane 1.9ND
""""""Bromodichloromethane 2.7ND
""""""cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.8ND
""""""4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)3.3ND
""""""trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.8ND
"""""Toluene "3.14.2
""""""1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2.2ND
""""""2-Hexanone (MBK)3.3ND
""""""Dibromochloromethane 3.5ND
"""""Tetrachloroethene "2.85.2
""""""1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)3.1ND
""""""1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8ND
""""""Chlorobenzene 1.9ND
""""""Ethylbenzene 1.8ND
"""""m,p-Xylene "1.82.5
""""""Styrene 1.7ND
""""""o-Xylene 1.8ND
Page 15 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA TO-15
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc.
Result Analyte Limit
Reporting
Units
Dilution
Batch Prepared Analyzed Method
Notes Factor
Duplicate (E608096-07) Vapor Sampled: 19-Aug-16 Received: 24-Aug-16
EPA TO-1525-Aug-16 26-Aug-16ug/m3 EH626011Bromoform4.2ND
""""""1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.8ND
""""""4-Ethyltoluene 2.0ND
""""""1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 2.0ND
""""""1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.0ND
""""""1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
""""""1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
""""""1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2.4ND
""""""1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 7.5ND
""""""Hexachlorobutadiene 11ND
""""118 % 76-134Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
""""100 % 78-125Surrogate: Toluene-d8
""""90.4 % 77-127Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Page 16 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA TO-15 - Quality Control
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc.
Batch EH62601 - TO-15
Blank (EH62601-BLK1)Prepared & Analyzed: 25-Aug-16
Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12)ug/m34.0ND
Chloromethane "0.8ND
Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (F114)"2.8ND
Vinyl chloride "0.5ND
Bromomethane "1.6ND
Chloroethane "1.1ND
Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)"2.3ND
1,1-Dichloroethene "1.6ND
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (F113)"3.1ND
Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)"1.4ND
Carbon disulfide "1.3ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene "1.6ND
1,1-Dichloroethane "1.6ND
2-Butanone (MEK)"2.4ND
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene "1.6ND
Chloroform "1.0ND
1,1,1-Trichloroethane "2.2ND
1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)"1.6ND
Benzene "0.6ND
Carbon tetrachloride "1.3ND
Trichloroethene "2.2ND
1,2-Dichloropropane "1.9ND
Bromodichloromethane "2.7ND
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene "1.8ND
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)"3.3ND
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene "1.8ND
Toluene "3.1ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane "2.2ND
2-Hexanone (MBK)"3.3ND
Dibromochloromethane "3.5ND
Tetrachloroethene "2.8ND
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)"3.1ND
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane "2.8ND
Chlorobenzene "1.9ND
Page 17 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA TO-15 - Quality Control
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc.
Batch EH62601 - TO-15
Blank (EH62601-BLK1)Prepared & Analyzed: 25-Aug-16
Ethylbenzene ug/m31.8ND
m,p-Xylene "1.8ND
Styrene "1.7ND
o-Xylene "1.8ND
Bromoform "4.2ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane "2.8ND
4-Ethyltoluene "2.0ND
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene "2.0ND
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene "2.0ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene "2.4ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene "2.4ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene "2.4ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene "7.5ND
Hexachlorobutadiene "11ND
" 42.9 76-134Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 11750.4
" 41.4 78-125Surrogate: Toluene-d8 10141.8
" 72.9 77-127Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 84.761.8
LCS (EH62601-BS1)Prepared: 25-Aug-16 Analyzed: 26-Aug-16
Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12)ug/m3 20.2 59-1281154.023
Vinyl chloride " 10.4 64-1271070.511
Chloroethane " 10.7 63-12780.91.18.7
Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)" 22.6 62-1261092.325
1,1-Dichloroethene " 16.2 61-1331101.618
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (F113)" 31.0 66-1261113.135
Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)" 14.2 QL-1H62-1151241.418
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene " 16.2 67-12499.61.616
1,1-Dichloroethane " 16.5 68-1261091.618
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene " 16.0 70-1211061.617
Chloroform " 19.8 68-1231131.023
1,1,1-Trichloroethane " 22.2 68-1251192.226
1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)" 16.5 65-1281161.619
Benzene " 13.0 69-1191120.615
Page 18 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA TO-15 - Quality Control
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc.
Batch EH62601 - TO-15
LCS (EH62601-BS1)Prepared: 25-Aug-16 Analyzed: 26-Aug-16
Carbon tetrachloride ug/m3 25.6 68-1321251.332
Trichloroethene " 21.9 71-1231002.222
Toluene " 15.4 66-11994.93.115
1,1,2-Trichloroethane " 22.2 73-11998.72.222
Tetrachloroethene " 27.6 66-12496.82.827
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane " 28.0 67-1291082.830
Ethylbenzene " 17.7 70-12486.81.815
m,p-Xylene " 17.7 61-13490.51.816
o-Xylene " 17.7 67-12584.81.815
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane " 28.0 65-12789.32.825
" 42.9 76-134Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 11649.5
" 41.4 78-125Surrogate: Toluene-d8 10242.1
" 72.9 77-127Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 94.168.6
LCS Dup (EH62601-BSD1)Prepared: 25-Aug-16 Analyzed: 26-Aug-16
Dichlorodifluoromethane (F12)ug/m3 20.2 2559-128118 3.004.024
Vinyl chloride " 10.4 2564-127102 4.290.511
Chloroethane " 10.7 2563-12781.6 0.9221.18.7
Trichlorofluoromethane (F11)" 22.6 2562-126101 8.082.323
1,1-Dichloroethene " 16.2 2561-133112 1.351.618
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (F113)" 31.0 2566-126115 3.293.136
Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane)" 14.2 25 QL-1H62-115120 3.271.417
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene " 16.2 2567-12497.6 2.021.616
1,1-Dichloroethane " 16.5 2568-126107 2.071.618
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene " 16.0 2570-121104 1.441.617
Chloroform " 19.8 2568-123115 1.091.023
1,1,1-Trichloroethane " 22.2 2568-125119 0.2082.227
1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)" 16.5 2565-128111 3.731.618
Benzene " 13.0 2569-119110 1.790.614
Carbon tetrachloride " 25.6 2568-132127 1.981.333
Trichloroethene " 21.9 2571-12395.7 4.822.221
Toluene " 15.4 2566-11993.7 1.323.114
1,1,2-Trichloroethane " 22.2 2573-11996.5 2.292.221
Page 19 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA TO-15 - Quality Control
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc.
Batch EH62601 - TO-15
LCS Dup (EH62601-BSD1)Prepared: 25-Aug-16 Analyzed: 26-Aug-16
Tetrachloroethene ug/m3 27.6 2566-12499.5 2.802.827
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane " 28.0 2567-129107 1.162.830
Ethylbenzene " 17.7 2570-12494.7 8.771.817
m,p-Xylene " 17.7 2561-13497.0 6.901.817
o-Xylene " 17.7 2567-12592.5 8.701.816
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane " 28.0 2565-12793.3 4.362.826
" 42.9 76-134Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 11348.3
" 41.4 78-125Surrogate: Toluene-d8 99.441.1
" 72.9 77-127Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.472.4
Page 20 of 21
Project:
Project Number:
Project Manager:
Reported:
Mid-Atlantic Associates
409 Rogers View Court
MAA082416-11
R2611-00 T4055 / Kinston, NC
Mr. Kelly JohnsonRaleigh, NC 27610 30-Aug-16 11:46
2470 Impala Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-804-9678 Phone
760-804-9159 Fax
H&P Mobile
Geochemistry Inc.
Notes and Definitions
QL-1H The LCS and/or LCSD recoveries fell above the established control specifications for this analyte. Any result for this compound
is qualified and should be considered biased high.
QL-1H The LCS and/or LCSD recoveries fell above the established control specifications for this analyte. Any result for this compound
is qualified and should be considered biased high.
Percent Recovery
Relative Percent DifferenceRPD
%REC
Method Detection LimitMDL
Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limitND
Leak Check CompoundLCC
Appendix
H&P Mobile Geochemistry, Inc. is approved as an Environmental Testing Laboratory and Mobile Laboratory in accordance with the DoD-ELAP and the
ISO 17025 programs, certification number L15-279-R1
H&P is approved by the State of Arizona as an Environmental Testing Laboratory and Mobile Laboratory, certification numbers AZM758 and AZ0779.
H&P is approved by the State of California as an Environmental Laboratory and Mobile Laboratory in conformance with the Environmental Laboratory
Accreditation Program (ELAP) for the category of Volatile and Semi-Volatile Organic Chemistry of Hazardous Waste, certification numbers 2740, 2741,
2743, 2744, 2745, 2754 & 2930.
H&P is approved by the State of Florida Department of Health under the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC)
certification number E871100.
The complete list of stationary and mobile laboratory certifications along with the fields of testing (FOTs) and analyte lists are available at
www.handpmg.com/about/certifications.
Page 21 of 21
Mobile
Geochemistry, Inc.
2470 Impala Drive. Carlsbad, CA 92010
& Field Officu -Signal Hill, CA
W handpmg.com E [e-mail] VAPOR I AIR Chain of Custody DATE: 3/ tev f 6
Page ~of _l_ P 760.804.96?8 F 760.804.9159
Lab Client imd Project Information . Slample Receipt (Lab Use Only)
Lab ClienVConsultant AL.cl-ML,~ ~c,~, 17'.tt"--Project Name I#: {(__'2-6 lt _ t)C, TqoY..S-Date Rec'd: ~r(7-t+l /<.t, Control#: J \JJ Ol '-tq; , Q \
Lab Client Project Manager: \(c,{.( -5, hA
" ,, e, l<J,'\..
Project Location: K c\v.fvttr // <-H&P Project#! MAAo81.4tv-1 l
Lab Client Address: \Oq '~,,Cell} V,0,o, Cf Report E-Mail(s): LabWor1<0rder# E~080'1 b
LabClientCity,State,Zip: Q.4\.-L•.(\ v t/L 1-1-bLO t::-S'ok,uv-1 Q~,\Ao.,-1',Ae ,C°'VJ Sample tnta~; 'po Yes O No O See Notes Below
Phone Number: ~\'\ i..sc ~~tt Receipt Gaugh ID: I \ l <.t, 1 Temp: RT
Reporting Requirements Turnaround Time Sampler Information Outside Lab:
~tandard Report O Level Ill O Level IV ~7dayStnd 0 24-HrRush Sample~s): K!..-{ \ V ") p\-vt ~P l R~~t Notes;(Tracki~ It. I~ 3fiieplg '502.C! '2..S5o
~eel EDD O Other EDD: O 3-day Rush O Mobile lab Signature: /JZ'? // -
O CA Geotracker Global ID: 0 48-HrRush O Other: __ Date: l!>/ t <2/ut t Lab PM Initials: ~ I (YJ .
Additional Instructions to Laboratory: E
-ft ...... Q) ... 6 "' "' O Check if Project Analyte List is Attached "' ~ USt.. ::; .c c ~ IL R\..s i I ZJ..f / Z-UIV
I-E ~ ~ E ~N ~Im ... 0 0 .... • Preferred VOC units (please choose one): .!!! L() -~ I.O "' c .., "' .., Q) E O z
...1 -"' . Q) e ~ c: :I: "' ~o o~ ~ "' 8 ~ g_O ~g/m3 ~i o:::6 i2 ";" ... 0 0 Qµg/L Qppbv Qppmv 0 .., I-rn -I-0 0 .!!!,. !D E < 00 ,c(N ;§ 0 I-< "E 0 ..,0 .;; O CL CL ~o CONTAINER IX ~~ "' "'E "' g. $ (.) -w :: 0 SAMPLE TYPE w ~ -g ~ -r > !~ C> "'> a, ~o >-FIELD POINT SIZE& TYPE ~I !s > o en ..!! en e> en c E ~ en Cl) ,0 "' Indoor Alr (IA), Ambient = .9-.l!l O ..c O ... 0 ca o <nO "'!;::: ~g ..c < Cl) ftl N NAME DATE TIME rn '° rn '° c <O ,5 <O "' <O "'0 c C> 0 Air (AA), Subslab (SS), 400mV1 LJ6L Summa ..... ~ ::::, ~ "'"' <n N a, N -a ~ ~~ E ~ (.) ... "' zo (.) 00 (.) 00 ~00 ~ .... .>< 0 £ ~(.) SAMPLE NAME (if applicable) mm/dd/yy 24hrdock Soil Vapor (SV) or Tedlar or Tube o-.c Q) §Z O §Z O ~o ~o I= 0 I= 0 ~o ~D "' ~o ... a:: 0 ..., :E
\{'(-\ ()(J,./\f>t kl '{:'39 55 \-\... itl 4-Lf-.31 I"<"" vq./;_ ~ ., \0-:.2.q 1 ,io -~.7.Z ~ v~--' ,~: 1~ 1l\ ... q..3~ ~
\IQ-Lt ,;. \t '\ t \ '"1.11 < v~-~ \ft l 't \q\ ~2-t..lv ~
V<-b \~~2.1-'t-;(, "tflf7 ~
V uo l,c..'{.t (... ,1r \q-.12 \y-"'V \l\'; 3~<t, ~ '
. ,, -Approved/Relllqllislledb~ /A/~ Compiny: A ltlr oate_gl~ll l./wne: l L\:·. o() Rece~~ ~p /-72-wtf,t, Time: -z_3opn,
Approved/Relilquished by: Com1uny: Date: • Time: ReceM!dby: Company: Dale: Time:
Approved/Relinqt.ished by: Comp,1111y: Date: Time: ReceM!dby: Company: Dale: Time:
Rev 08/18/2014