Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
20019_Sinclair Refining_Phase II ESA_2015.12.29
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Industrial Warehouse 409 East 35th Street Charlotte, North Carolina H&H Job No. ELP-002 December 29, 2015 Sent via Email (amk@visionventures.net) December 29, 2015 c/o Eller Capital Partners 1480 Environ Way Chapel Hill, NC 27517 Attention: Tony Kuhn Subject Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Industrial Warehouse 409 East 35th Street Charlotte, North Carolina H&H Job No. ELP-02 Dear Tony: 1.0 Introduction This report presents the methods and results of a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) conducted by Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) at the industrial warehouse property located at 409 East 35th Street in Charlotte, North Carolina (site or subject site). The site consists of the following two contiguous parcels of land: • Parcel 08308409 – a 1.1-acre industrial property developed with a 21,232-square foot industrial warehouse built in 1992; and • Parcel 08308436 – a 0.44-acre vacant lot currently utilized for parking. The properties are owned by RM 36th Street Investors, LLC and are located in the North Davidson Street (NoDa) community northeast of uptown Charlotte. H&H completed a Phase I ESA at the site in November 2015 and identified the following recognized environmental conditions (RECs) associated with the subject site: Tony Kuhn December 29, 2016 Page 2 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\Eller Capital Partners (ELP)\ELP-002 NoDa Site\Phase II ESA\Phase II Report\Phase II Report - 409 East 35th Street.docx On-Site REC • Sinclair Refining Co. (a.k.a. Merchants Oil and the Chemical Processing Co.) previously stored and distributed gasoline and processed oils for sale to the textile industry on the subject site from the 1920s until the 1950s. Based on our review of historical records (i.e. city directories, aerial photographs, and Sanborn maps) the site was previously developed with an oil storage/office building located in the northeastern portion of the site; seven gas tanks, an oil truck building, a textile oil processing warehouse, and an oil warehouse located in the central portion of the site; and a railroad trestle located in the southwestern portion of the site. H&H did not locate records of release incidents associated with the former Sinclair facility during our review of databases in the Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) environmental database report or during our review of records on the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) CARA³ web-portal. In 2007, H&H, on behalf of Merrifield Partners, conducted Phase II ESA soil and groundwater sampling activities as part of a Brownfields assessment on a larger 8.49-acre property that included the subject site (referred to as the southern parcel) and the adjacent Newco Fibre Co. / NoDa Textile property located northwest of the subject site (referred to as the northern parcel). During Phase II ESA activities, H&H collected five soil samples on the subject site at locations near the former gasoline tanks (SB-1); the former oil truck building (SB-2); the former oil warehouse (SB-3); the former textile oil processing warehouse (SB-4); and the former oil storage building (SB-5). H&H did not collect groundwater samples during our 2007 assessment of the subject site. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) including benzo[a]pyrene (0.43 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)), benzo[a]anthracene (0.40 mg/kg), and benzo[b]fluoranthene (0.58 mg/kg) were detected in a shallow soil sample collected from boring SB-2 at concentrations above current DEQ Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB), Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs). The benzo[a]pyrene concentration was above the Tony Kuhn December 29, 2016 Page 3 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\Eller Capital Partners (ELP)\ELP-002 NoDa Site\Phase II ESA\Phase II Report\Phase II Report - 409 East 35th Street.docx Protection of Groundwater PSRG of 0.059 mg/kg, Residential PSRG of 0.016 mg/kg, and Industrial PSRG of 0.029 mg/kg. The benzo[a]anthracene concentration was above the Protection of Groundwater PSRG and Residential PSRG of 0.18 mg/kg and 0.16 mg/kg, respectively. The benzo[b]fluoranthene concentration was above the Residential PSRG of 0.16 mg/kg. The concentration of benzo[a]pyrene also exceeded DEQ Underground Storage Tank (UST) Section, Soil-to-Water and Residential Maximum Soil Contaminant Concentrations (MSCCs) of 0.096 mg/kg and 0.088 mg/kg, respectively and the concentration of benzo[a]anthracene was above the Soil-to-Water MSCC of 0.35 mg/kg. Soil sample results from the March 2007 Phase II ESA soil sampling activities are summarized in Table 1. Off-Site RECs • The former Homer Wooten gas station site (442/452 East 36th Street) previously operated as a service station and an auto repair shop at a location adjacent, east, and topographically upgradient of the subject site from the 1920s until the 1960s. The property is currently developed as a residence and storage building. H&H reviewed the UST and the leaking underground storage tank (LUST) databases on the DEQ website but did not locate records of previous assessment activities or of documented release incidents. Due to distance and area topography, a potential exists for impact to the subject site from historical fuel storage and auto repair activities on the adjacent and upgradient former gas station property. • The former Wright Cleaning Co. (3219 North Davidson Street) previously operated as a dry cleaners at a location adjacent, southeast, and topographically upgradient of the subject site in the 1950s and 1960s. The property is currently developed as a retail building occupied by McCullough Auto. H&H did not find records of release incidents associated with the former dry cleaners during our review of databases in the EDR report, or during our review of records on the DEQ CARA³ web-portal. Due to distance and Tony Kuhn December 29, 2016 Page 4 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\Eller Capital Partners (ELP)\ELP-002 NoDa Site\Phase II ESA\Phase II Report\Phase II Report - 409 East 35th Street.docx area topography, a potential exists for impact to the subject site from historical dry cleaning activities on the adjacent and upgradient former dry cleaners property. • The former Staton’s Self-Service Station/Fat City site (3123-3131 North Davidson Street) operated as a service station at a location adjacent, south, and topographically upgradient of the subject site from the 1930s to the 1960s. The property is currently developed as the Nevitt Building. The former gas station site is identified on the LUST and the LUST Trust Fund (TRUST) databases. According to information provided in the databases, soil contamination was discovered in July 2007 during removal of four orphan USTs. It does not appear that groundwater was assessed at the property during UST removal activities and the status of the release is not listed. Due to distance and area topography, a potential exists for impact to the subject site from historical fuel storage activities on the adjacent and upgradient former gas station property. • A former dry cleaners (3207 North Davidson Street) operated at a location adjacent, southeast, and topographically upgradient of the subject site from the 1930s to the 1970s. The property is currently developed as a retail building and is occupied by Evolution. H&H did not find records of release incidents associated with the former dry cleaners during our review of databases in the EDR report or during our review of records on the DEQ CARA³ web-portal. Due to distance and area topography, a potential exists for impact to the subject site from historical dry cleaning activities on the adjacent and upgradient former dry cleaners property. H&H conducted Phase II ESA soil and groundwater sampling activities at the subject site to 1) supplement Phase II ESA soil sampling activities conducted in March 2007 (collection of soil samples SB-1 through SB-5), and 2) further assess the potential for subsurface impact at the site from historical on-site and off-site operations. A summary of the December 2015 Phase II ESA soil and groundwater sampling activities is presented in the following sections. Tony Kuhn December 29, 2016 Page 5 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\Eller Capital Partners (ELP)\ELP-002 NoDa Site\Phase II ESA\Phase II Report\Phase II Report - 409 East 35th Street.docx 2.0 Phase II ESA Activities 2.1 Soil Sampling Activities On December 10, 2015, H&H contracted with Carolina Soil Investigations (CSI) to advance four soil borings (SB-6 through SB-9) at the site to further evaluate the potential for soil impact at the following locations: Soil Borings and Soil Sample Analyses Area of Concern/ Proposed Sample Location Soil Borings Total Depth (ft bgs) VOCs by 8260 SVOCs by 8270 HSL Metals Southwestern Parcel SB-6 (TMW-1) 38 X X X Former Gasoline AST Area Sampled during 2007 Phase II ESA Former Oil House and Textile Oil Processing Building SB-7 (TMW-2) and SB-9 30 and 8 2 X 2 X 2 X Former Oil Storage Building SB-8 (MW-3) 30 X X X Notes: SB = Soil Boring TMW = Temporary Monitoring Well ft bgs = feet below ground surface AST = Aboveground Storage Tank VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds SVOCs = Semi-VOCs HSL = Hazardous Substance List CSI advanced the soil borings with a hand auger and direct push technology (DPT) drill rig. H&H screened soils from the soil borings in the field for the presence of odors, staining, and/or elevated photo-ionization detector (PID) readings. H&H did not advance a soil boring in the area of the former gasoline AST because soil sample SB-1 was previously collected in this area during 2007 Phase II ESA activities and due to access constraints within the existing warehouse. Tony Kuhn December 29, 2016 Page 6 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\Eller Capital Partners (ELP)\ELP-002 NoDa Site\Phase II ESA\Phase II Report\Phase II Report - 409 East 35th Street.docx Based on field screening results, H&H collected one soil sample from each of the four borings for laboratory analysis from the depth interval that exhibited the greatest evidence of impact (i.e., elevated PID readings, staining, and/or petroleum/chemical odors). When no evidence of field impact in a boring was noted, H&H submitted a shallow sample (approximately 1-3 ft bgs) from that boring for laboratory analysis. Soil samples were submitted for laboratory analyses to Test America, Inc. (TA) for the compounds noted in the table above. 2.2 Groundwater Sampling Activities On December 10, 2015, H&H directed CSI to advance three soil borings to depths below the water table for installation of temporary groundwater monitoring wells at the following locations: Temporary Monitoring Wells and Groundwater Analyses Proposed Sample Location Temporary Monitoring Wells Total Depth (ft bgs) Screen Interval (ft bgs) VOCs by 6200 SVOCs by 625 Southwestern Parcel TMW-1 (SB-6) 38 23 - 38 X X Former Oil House and Textile Oil Processing Building and Downgradient of the Former Gasoline AST TMW-2 (SB-7) 30 20 - 30 X X Former Oil Storage Building TMW-3 (SB-8) 30 20 -30 X X Notes: SB = Soil Boring TMW = Temporary Monitoring Well ft bgs = feet below ground surface AST = Aboveground Storage Tank VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds SVOCs = Semi-VOCs CSI advanced soil borings SB-6, SB-7, and SB-8 to a depth below the groundwater table for installation of temporary monitoring wells and collection of groundwater samples using a combination of DPT and air rotary drilling techniques. Partially weathered rock was Tony Kuhn December 29, 2016 Page 7 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\Eller Capital Partners (ELP)\ELP-002 NoDa Site\Phase II ESA\Phase II Report\Phase II Report - 409 East 35th Street.docx encountered at depths in the temporary monitoring well locations ranging from 12 to 18 ft bgs, and groundwater was encountered below the partially weathered rock layer at depths ranging from 14 to 19 ft bgs across the site. The temporary monitoring wells were constructed with one-inch diameter PVC with 10 or 15 ft of well screen set to bracket the groundwater table. Prior to sampling, H&H developed the temporary monitoring wells by removing three well bore volumes using a peristaltic pump. Development continued until purge fluids were sediment-free and when field parameters (temperature, pH, and conductivity) stabilized. H&H collected groundwater samples from the three temporary monitoring wells (TMW-1 to TMW-3) and submitted the samples to TA for laboratory analyses as noted in the table above. In accordance with Mecklenburg County requirements, H&H obtained a Subsurface Investigation Permit (SIP) for the temporary groundwater monitoring wells prior to implementing the field activities. 2.3 Boring Abandonment and Investigation Derived Waste After completion of the soil and groundwater sampling activities, CSI abandoned the soil borings and temporary monitoring wells by removing well screen materials and filling the soil borings with bentonite and/or grout. CSI also patched the surfaces to match the surrounding area. 3.0 Phase II ESA Sample Results Analytical results for the December 2015 Phase II ESA soil and groundwater samples are summarized in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Boring logs are included in Appendix A and laboratory analytical data reports and chain-of-custody records are included in Appendix B. Tony Kuhn December 29, 2016 Page 8 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\Eller Capital Partners (ELP)\ELP-002 NoDa Site\Phase II ESA\Phase II Report\Phase II Report - 409 East 35th Street.docx 3.1 Soil Sample Results Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) including benzo[a]pyrene (2.54 mg/kg) and benzo[b]fluoranthene (3.29 mg/kg) were detected in the SB-6 (4-6 ft bgs) soil sample (collected in the southwestern portion of the site) at concentrations exceeding DEQ screening levels. The concentration of benzo[a]pyrene was above the DEQ IHSB Protection of Groundwater, Residential, and Industrial PSRGs of 0.059 mg/kg, 0.016 mg/kg and 0.29 mg/kg, respectively and above the DEQ UST Section Soil-to-Water, Residential, and Industrial/Commercial MSCCs of 0.096 mg/kg, 0.088 mg/kg, and 0.78 mg/kg, respectively. The concentration of benzo[b]fluoranthene was above the DEQ IHSB Protection of Groundwater, Residential, and Industrial PSRGs of 0.60 mg/kg, 0.16 mg/kg and 2.9 mg/kg, respectively and above the DEQ UST Section Soil-to-Water and Residential MSCCs of 1.2 mg/kg and 0.88 mg/kg, respectively. The SVOCs indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene (1.35 mg/kg) and benzo[a]anthracene (2.58 mg/kg) were also detected in the SB-6 (4-6 ft bgs) sample at concentrations exceeding DEQ screening levels. The concentration of indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene was above the Residential PSRG of 0.16 mg/kg and the Residential MSCC of 0.88 mg/kg. The concentration of benzo[a]anthracene was above the Protection of Groundwater and Residential PSRGs of 0.18 mg/kg and 0.16 mg/kg, respectively and the Soil-to-Water and Residential MSCCs of 0.35 mg/kg and 0.88 mg/kg, respectively. Additional SVOCs were detected in the SB-6 (4-6 ft bgs) soil sample; however, at concentrations below DEQ screening levels. The SVOC benzo[a]pyrene (0.0945 mg/kg) was also detected in the SB-7 (1-3 ft bgs) soil sample (collected near the former oil house in the northern portion of the site) at a concentration exceeding the Protection of Groundwater and Residential PSRGs of 0.059 mg/kg and 0.016 mg/kg, respectively and the Residential MSCC of 0.088 mg/kg. Additional SVOCs were detected in the SB-7 (1-3 ft bgs) soil sample; however, at concentrations below DEQ screening levels. Tony Kuhn December 29, 2016 Page 9 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\Eller Capital Partners (ELP)\ELP-002 NoDa Site\Phase II ESA\Phase II Report\Phase II Report - 409 East 35th Street.docx SVOCs were not detected in the SB-8 (1-3 ft bgs) soil sample (collected in the northeastern portion of the site near the former oil storage building) or in the SB-9 (5-7 ft bgs) soil sample (collected in the southern portion of the site near the former textile oil processing building). Analytical results indicate that concentrations of metals detected were within the typical background concentration range of North Carolina soils as cited in Dragun & Chekiri’s Elements in North American Soil (2nd edition), except for detections of cadmium (13.3 mg/kg), lead (61.9 mg/kg), and zinc (928 mg/kg) in SB-6 and nickel (151 mg/kg) in SB-9 that were slightly above the background concentration upper ranges of 10 mg/kg, 50 mg/kg, 124 mg/kg, and 150 mg/kg, respectively. The cadmium, lead, and zinc detections were below DEQ screening levels and the concentration of nickel slightly exceeded the Protection of Groundwater PSRG of 130 mg/kg. Acetone was the only volatile organic compound (VOC) detected in soil samples SB-6 (4-6 ft bgs), SB-7 (1-3 ft bgs), and SB-8 (1-3 ft bgs) at concentrations below DEQ screening levels. Please note that acetone is a common artifact from laboratory decontamination procedures. 3.2 Groundwater Sample Results Analytical results of the groundwater sample collected from TMW-3 (located in the northeastern portion of the site near the former oil house and downgradient of an off-site former gas station) reported the presence of the SVOC 1-methylnaphthalene at a concentration of 14.1 micrograms per liter (µg/L) which is above the North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standard (2L Standard) of 1.0 µg/L. No other SVOCs or VOCs were detected above 2L Standards in the groundwater sample collected from temporary monitoring well TMW-3. Also, no target SVOCs or VOCs were detected in the groundwater samples collected from TMW-1 (located on the southwestern parcel downgradient of an off-site former gas station) and TMW-2 (located in the northern Tony Kuhn December 29, 2016 Page 10 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\Eller Capital Partners (ELP)\ELP-002 NoDa Site\Phase II ESA\Phase II Report\Phase II Report - 409 East 35th Street.docx portion of the site downgradient of the former oil house, former textile oil processing building, and former gasoline storage tank area) at concentrations above laboratory detection limits. 4.0 Findings H&H conducted Phase II ESA soil and groundwater sampling activities to 1) supplement Phase II ESA soil sampling activities conducted in March 2007 (collection of soil samples SB-1 through SB-5), and 2) further assess the potential for subsurface impact at the site from historical on-site and off-site operations. Soil assessment results indicate that concentrations of two SVOCs, benzo[a]pyrene and benzo[b]fluoranthene, detected in the SB-6 boring located in the southwestern portion of the site exceed DEQ IHSB Industrial PSRGs. The concentration of benzo[a]pyrene also exceeds the DEQ UST Section Industrial/Commercial MSCC. SVOCs were also detected in SB-6 (benzo[a]anthracene and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene) and in SB-7 (benzo[a]pyrene) located near the former oil house in the northern portion of the site at concentrations exceeding Residential PSRGs and Residential MSCCs. Based on the groundwater analytical results, 1-methylnaphthalene was detected at a concentration above the 2L Standard in TMW-3 located in the northeastern portion of the site near the former oil house and downgradient of an off-site former gas station. No target SVOCs or VOCs were detected in the groundwater samples collected from TMW-1 located on the southwestern parcel downgradient of an off-site former gas station, and TMW-2 located in the northern portion of the site downgradient of the former oil house, former textile oil processing building, and former gasoline storage tank area at concentrations above laboratory detection limits. DEQ regulations require the responsible party to perform initial response and abatement actions which include reporting the release incident to DEQ. Appropriate response actions may include Tony Kuhn December 29, 2016 Page 11 \\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\Eller Capital Partners (ELP)\ELP-002 NoDa Site\Phase II ESA\Phase II Report\Phase II Report - 409 East 35th Street.docx remediation, further assessment, and/or additional monitoring in an attempt to close the release incident. Alternatively, petroleum-impacted soil and groundwater identified at the site can likely be managed during site redevelopment activities if the prospective developer (PD) elects to enter into a Brownfields Agreement (Agreement) with DEQ, and if the PD is determined to be eligible by DEQ prior to purchase of the property. The Agreement provides the PD with 1) liability protection in the form of a covenant not-to-sue that can be shown to a lender in order to obtain project financing, which can be passed on to new owners so long as they adhere to the land use restrictions; and 2) a property tax incentive that can significantly reduce property taxes on the improved value for five years after completion of improvements to the property. This benefit typically pays for (or at least offsets) site environmental assessment, risk mitigation, or cleanup activities that the developer may need to conduct under the Agreement. Thank you for the opportunity to assist you with this project. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call us at (704) 586-0007. Very truly yours, Hart & Hickman, PC Matt Ingalls John Reuscher, PG, RSM Project Manager Senior Reviewer Attachments: Table 1: Summary of Soil Analytical Data Table 2: Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data Figure 1: Site Location Map Figure 2: Sample Location Map Appendix A: Soil Boring Logs Appendix B: Laboratory Analytical Data Reports Ta b l e 1 Su m m a r y o f S o i l A n a l y t i c a l R e s u l t s 40 9 E a s t 3 5 t h S t r e e t Ch a r l o t t e , M e c k l e n b u r g C o u n t y , N o r t h C a r o l i n a H& H J o b N o . E L P - 0 0 2 Sa m p l e I D SB - 1 SB - 3 S B - 4 S B - 5 S B - 6 SB - 7 SB - 8 SB - 9 Sa m p l e D e p t h ( f t b g s ) 1. 5 - 2 . 5 1 . 5 - 2 . 5 1 4 - 1 5 1 . 5 - 2 . 5 1 . 5 - 2 . 5 1 . 5 - 2 . 5 4 - 6 1- 3 1- 3 5- 7 Sa m p l e D a t e Re s i d e n t i a l PS R G In d u s t r i a l P S R G Protection of Groundwater PSRGResidential MSCCsIndustrial/ Commercial MSCCsSoil-to-Water MSCCs VO C s ( 8 2 6 0 ) ( m g / k g ) Ac e t o n e 0. 1 6 0 . 1 NA < 0 . 0 5 8 < 0 . 0 6 7 < 0 . 0 6 1 0 . 2 3 0 0 . 1 1 9 0 . 0 5 6 2 < 0 . 0 5 7 1 12 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 24 14,000 3 6 0 , 0 0 0 24 2- B u t a n o n e ( M E K ) 0. 0 1 8 < 0 . 0 1 2 N A < 0 . 0 1 2 < 0 . 0 1 2 < 0 . 0 1 2 < 0 . 0 4 5 4 < 0 . 0 4 5 6 < 0 . 0 5 0 5 < 0 . 0 5 7 1 5, 4 0 0 38,000 16 9,385 2 4 5 , 2 8 0 16 SV O C s ( 8 2 7 0 D ) ( m g / k g ) Ac e n a p h t h e n e <0 . 4 3 < 0 . 4 0 < 0 . 3 7 < 0 . 3 8 < 0 . 4 4 < 0 . 4 0 0 . 8 3 4 < 0 . 0 8 9 0 < 0 . 0 8 7 2 < 0 . 0 8 7 3 7 2 0 9,000 8.4 940 24,000 8.2 An t h r a c e n e <0 . 4 3 < 0 . 4 0 < 0 . 3 7 < 0 . 3 8 < 0 . 4 4 < 0 . 4 0 1 . 2 1 < 0 . 0 8 9 0 < 0 . 0 8 7 2 < 0 . 0 8 7 3 3 , 6 0 0 46,000 660 4,600 1 2 2 , 0 0 0 940 Be n z o [ a ] a n t h r a c e n e <0 . 4 3 0. 4 0 <0 . 3 7 < 0 . 3 8 < 0 . 4 4 < 0 . 4 0 2. 5 8 0. 1 0 1 < 0 . 0 8 7 2 < 0 . 0 8 7 3 0 . 1 6 2.9 0.18 0.88 8 0.35 Be n z o [ a ] p y r e n e <0 . 4 3 0. 4 3 <0 . 3 7 < 0 . 3 8 < 0 . 4 4 < 0 . 4 0 2. 5 4 0. 0 9 4 5 <0 . 0 8 7 2 < 0 . 0 8 7 3 0 . 0 1 6 0 . 2 9 0 . 0 5 9 0 . 0 8 8 0 . 7 8 0 . 0 9 6 Be n z o [ b ] f l u o r a n t h e n e < 0 . 4 3 0. 5 8 <0 . 3 7 < 0 . 3 8 < 0 . 4 4 < 0 . 4 0 3. 2 9 0. 1 1 2 < 0 . 0 8 7 2 < 0 . 0 8 7 3 0. 1 6 2 . 9 0 . 6 0 . 8 8 8 1 . 2 Be n z o [ g , h , i ] p e r y l e n e < 0 . 4 3 < 0 . 4 0 < 0 . 3 7 < 0 . 3 8 < 0 . 4 4 < 0 . 4 0 1 . 7 8 < 0 . 0 8 9 0 < 0 . 0 8 7 2 < 0 . 0 8 7 3 N E N E 7 , 8 0 0 4 6 9 1 2 , 2 6 4 6 , 4 0 0 Be n z o [ k ] f l u o r a n t h e n e < 0 . 4 3 < 0 . 4 0 < 0 . 3 7 < 0 . 3 8 < 0 . 4 4 < 0 . 4 0 1 . 1 6 < 0 . 0 8 9 0 < 0 . 0 8 7 2 < 0 . 0 8 7 3 1 . 6 2 9 5 . 9 9 7 8 1 2 Ch r y s e n e < 0 . 4 3 < 0 . 4 0 < 0 . 3 7 < 0 . 3 8 < 0 . 4 4 < 0 . 4 0 2 . 7 0 0 . 0 9 9 4 < 0 . 0 8 7 2 < 0 . 0 8 7 3 1 6 2 9 0 1 8 8 8 7 8 0 3 9 Flu o r a n t h e n e < 0 . 4 3 0 . 5 8 < 0 . 3 7 < 0 . 3 8 < 0 . 4 4 < 0 . 4 0 7 . 3 7 0 . 2 3 9 < 0 . 0 8 7 2 < 0 . 0 8 7 3 4 8 0 6 , 0 0 0 3 3 0 6 2 0 1 6 , 4 0 0 2 9 0 Flu o r e n e < 0 . 4 3 < 0 . 4 0 < 0 . 3 7 < 0 . 3 8 < 0 . 4 4 < 0 . 4 0 0 . 6 1 7 < 0 . 0 8 9 0 < 0 . 0 8 7 2 < 0 . 0 8 7 3 4 8 0 6 , 0 0 0 5 6 6 2 0 1 6 , 4 0 0 4 7 In d e n o [ 1 , 2 , 3 - c d ] p y r e n e < 0 . 4 3 < 0 . 4 0 < 0 . 3 7 < 0 . 3 8 < 0 . 4 4 < 0 . 4 0 1. 3 5 <0 . 0 8 9 0 < 0 . 0 8 7 2 < 0 . 0 8 7 3 0. 1 6 2 . 9 2 0 . 8 8 8 3 . 4 Ph e n a n t h r e n e < 0 . 4 3 < 0 . 4 0 < 0 . 3 7 < 0 . 3 8 < 0 . 4 4 < 0 . 4 0 5 . 3 9 0 . 0 9 9 4 < 0 . 0 8 7 2 < 0 . 0 8 7 3 N E N E 6 8 4 6 9 1 2 , 2 6 4 5 6 Be n z l b u t y l p h t h a l a t e < 0 . 4 3 < 0 . 4 0 < 0 . 3 7 < 0 . 3 8 1 . 3 < 0 . 4 0 < 2 . 1 1 < 0 . 4 4 3 < 0 . 4 3 3 < 0 . 4 3 4 2 9 0 1 , 2 0 0 1 5 0 N E N E N E Bi s ( 2 - e t h y l h e x y l ) p h t h a l a t e < 0 . 4 3 0 . 4 1 < 0 . 3 7 < 0 . 3 8 0 . 8 5 0 . 5 6 < 2 . 1 1 < 0 . 4 3 3 < 0 . 4 3 3 < 0 . 4 3 4 3 9 1 6 0 7 . 2 4 6 4 1 0 6 . 6 Di- n - b u t y l p h t h a l a t e <0 . 4 3 < 0 . 4 0 < 0 . 3 7 < 0 . 3 8 0 . 5 5 < 0 . 4 0 < 2 . 1 1 < 0 . 4 3 3 < 0 . 4 3 3 < 0 . 4 3 4 1, 3 0 0 1 6 , 0 0 0 1 9 N E N E N E Py r e n e < 0 . 4 3 0 . 8 9 < 0 . 3 7 < 0 . 3 8 < 0 . 4 4 < 0 . 4 0 6 . 0 6 0 . 2 0 3 < 0 . 0 8 7 2 < 0 . 0 8 7 3 36 0 4 , 6 0 0 2 2 0 4 6 9 1 2 , 2 6 4 2 7 0 Me t a l s (60 1 0 C / 7 4 7 1 B ) (m g /k g) Range (mg/kg)Mean (mg/kg) Be r y l l i u m N A N A N A N A N A N A < 1 . 2 5 1 . 3 3 < 1 . 3 2 1 . 5 9 3 2 4 6 0 6 3 N E N E N E N D - 2 . 0 0 . 1 1 Ca d m i u m 1 . 7 1 . 3 N A 0 . 9 6 0 . 8 4 1 . 5 13 . 3 8. 3 5 < 1 . 3 2 < 1 . 3 2 1 4 2 0 0 3 N E N E N E 1 . 0 - 1 0 * 4 . 3 0 Ch r o m i u m I I I 1 2 0 4 9 N A 1 4 4 9 1 5 1 8 9 1 1 8 1 3 0 1 1 9 2 4 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 3 6 0 , 0 0 0 2 3 , 4 6 0 6 1 3 , 2 0 0 4 , 2 0 0 7 . 0 - 3 0 0 6 5 Ch r o m i u m V I N A N A N A N A N A N A < 6 . 4 2 < 6 . 6 4 < 6 . 5 8 < 0 . 0 3 3 1 0 . 3 6 . 3 3 . 8 4 7 1 2 2 6 5 . 4 N E N E Co p p e r N A N A N A N A N A N A 5 6 . 0 5 4 . 5 9 7 . 3 5 2 . 4 6 2 0 9 , 4 0 0 7 0 0 N E N E N E 3 . 0 - 1 0 0 3 4 Le a d 4 3 1 0 0 N A 1 7 1 6 2 1 61 . 9 34 . 7 1 8 . 2 1 5 . 1 4 0 0 8 0 0 2 7 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 2 7 0 N D - 5 0 1 6 Ma n g a n e s e N A N A N A N A N A N A 9 4 6 1 , 0 7 0 6 7 5 2 , 9 1 0 3 6 0 5 , 2 0 0 6 5 N E N E N E 8 . 0 - 3 , 3 9 4 5 9 4 Me r c u r y 0 . 0 3 3 0 . 0 3 3 N A < 0 . 0 2 3 0 . 0 3 9 < 0 . 0 2 4 0 . 3 7 9 0 . 3 0 1 < 0 . 1 2 6 < 0 . 1 3 2 1 . 9 3 . 1 1 . 0 N E N E N E 0 . 0 3 - 0 . 5 2 0 . 1 2 1 Ni c k e l N A N A N A N A N A N A 5 0 . 2 5 9 . 5 4 8 . 8 15 1 30 0 4 , 4 0 0 1 3 0 N E N E N E N D - 1 5 0 2 3 Zi n c N A N A N A N A N A N A 92 8 76 . 4 70 . 6 11 6 4, 6 0 0 70,000 1,200 NE NE NE 25-124 5 6 No t e s : NC D E Q = N o r t h C a r o l i n a D e p a r t m e n t o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l Q u a l i t y ( D E Q ) ; I H S B = I n a c t i v e H a z a r d o u s S i t e s B r a n c h 1) N C D E Q P r o t e c t i o n o f G r o u n d w a t e r , R e s i d e n t i a l , a n d I n d u s t r i a l H e a l t h B a s e d P r e l i m i n a r y S o i l R e m e d i a t i o n G o a l s ( P S R G s ) - S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 2) N C D E Q M a x i m u m S o i l C o n t a m i n a n t C o n c e n t r a t i o n s ( M S C C s ) f o r N o n - U n d e r g r o u n d S t o r a g e T a n k ( U S T ) R e l e a s e s o f P e t r o l e u m - J u l y 2 0 1 2 Bo l d in d i c a t e s a n e x c e e d a n c e o f t h e R e s i d e n t i a l P S R G It a l i c i z e d in d i c a t e s a n e x c e e d a n c e o f P r o t e c t i o n o f G r o u n d w a t e r P S R G o r f o r m e t a l s e x c e e d s t h e r a n g e Un d e r l i n e i n d i c a t e s a n e x c e e d a n c e o f t h e I n d u s t r i a l P S R G So i l s a m p l e s S B - 1 t h r o u g h S B - 5 c o l l e c t e d d u r i n g M a r c h 2 0 0 7 P h a s e I I E S A s a m p l i n g a c t i v i t i e s . So i l s a m p l e s S B - 6 t h r o u g h S B - 9 c o l l e c t e d d u r i n g D e c e m b e r 2 0 1 5 s a m p l i n g a c t i v i t i e s . Ra n g e a n d M e a n b a c k g ro u n d v a l u e s f o r N o r t h C a r o l i n a o r S o u t h e a s t s o i l s t a k e n f r o m El e m e n t s i n N o r t h A m e r i c a n S o i l s b y D r a g un a n d C h e k i r i , 2 0 0 5 Ch r o m i u m I I I d e t e r m i n e d b y s u b t r a c t i n g t o t a l c h r o m i u m c o n c e n t r a t i o n f r o m h e x a v a l e n t c h r o m i u m ( c h r o m i u m V I ) c o n c e n t r a t i o n EP A M e t h o d f o l l o w s p a r a m e t e r i n p a r e n t h e s i s ; N E = N o t E s t a b l i s h e d ; N A = N o t A n a l y z e d VO C s = V o l a t i l e o r g a n i c c o m p o u n d s ; S V O C s = S e m i - v o l a t i l e o r g a n i c c o m p o u n d s On l y c o m p o u n d s d e t e c t e d i n a t l e a s t o n e s a m p l e s h o w n mg / k g = m i l l i g r a m s p e r k i l o g r a m * = R a n g e a n d m e a n v a l u e s o f b a c k g r o u n d m e t a l s f o r S o u t h e a s t e r n U S A s o i l s . ME K = M e t h y l E t h y l K e t o n e ft b g s = f e e t b e l o w t h e g ro u n d s u r f a c e Background* SB - 2 Screening Criteria PS R G s ( m g / k g ) ( 1 ) M S C C s ( m g / k g ) ( 2 ) 3/ 1 4 / 2 0 0 7 1 2 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 5 S:\ A A A - M a s t e r P r o j e c t s \ E l l e r C a p i t a l P a r t n e r s ( E L P ) \ E L P - 0 0 2 N o D a S i t e \ P h a s e I I E S A \ T a b l e s \ S o i l a n d G r o u n d w a t e r D a t a T a b l e s 12 / 2 9 / 2 0 1 5 Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PC Ta b l e 2 Su m m a r y o f G r o u n d w a t e r A n a l y t i c a l R e s u l t s 40 9 E a s t 3 5 t h S t r e e t Ch a r l o t t e , M e c k l e n b u r g C o u n t y , N o r t h C a r o l i n a H& H J o b N o . E L P - 0 0 2 Sa m p l e I D TM W - 1 TM W - 2 T M W - 3 Sa m p l e D a t e 12 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 5 1 2 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 5 1 2 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 5 VO C s ( 8 2 6 0 B ) ( µ g / L ) 1, 2 , 4 - T r i m e t h y l b e n z e n e <1 . 0 0 <1 . 0 0 12 3 1, 3 , 5 - T r i m e t h y l b e n z e n e <1 . 0 0 <1 . 0 0 62 . 4 Et h y l b e n z e n e <1 . 0 0 <1 . 0 0 25 . 6 Is o p r o p y l b e n z e n e <1 . 0 0 <1 . 0 0 7. 4 9 n- B u t y l b e n z e n e <1 . 0 0 <1 . 0 0 48 . 0 n- P r o p y l b e n z e n e <1 . 0 0 <1 . 0 0 35 . 8 p- I s o p r o p y l t o l u e n e <1 . 0 0 <1 . 0 0 5. 2 5 se c - B u t y l b e n z e n e <1 . 0 0 <1 . 0 0 9. 7 3 To t a l X y l e n e s <3 . 0 0 <3 . 0 0 30 . 2 SV O C s ( 8 2 7 0 D ) ( µ g / L ) 1- M e t h y l n a p t h a l e n e <1 . 8 5 <1 . 8 5 14 . 1 2- M e t h y l n a p t h a l e n e <1 . 8 5 <1 . 8 5 10 . 5 Na p h t h a l e n e <1 . 8 5 <1 . 8 5 5. 5 6 No t e s : EP A M e t h o d f o l l o w s p a r a m e t e r i n p a r e n t h e s i s ; N E = N o t e s t a b l i s h e d VO C s = V o l a t i l e o r g a n i c c o m p o u n d s ; S V O C s = S e m i - v o l a t i l e o r g a n i c c o m p o u n d s On l y c o m p o u n d s d e t e c t e d i n a t l e a s t o n e s a m p l e s h o w n mg / L = M i c r o g r a m s p e r l i t e r 30 40 0 7070 702570 Bo l d c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n d i c a t e s e x c e e d a n c e o f a N C D E Q 1 5 A N C A C 0 2 L . 0 2 0 2 G r o u n d w a t e r S t a n d a r d Sc r e e n i n g C r i t e r i a 40 0 650 0 1 NC A C 2 L S t a n d a r d ( µ g / L ) 60 0 S:\ A A A - M a s t e r P r o j e c t s \ E l l e r C a p i t a l P a r t n e r s ( E L P ) \ E L P - 0 0 2 N o D a S i t e \ P h a s e I I E S A \ T a b l e s \ S o i l a n d G r o u n d w a t e r D a t a T a b l e s 12 / 2 9 / 2 0 1 5 Table 2 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PC TITLE PROJECT SITE LOCATION MAP INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE PROPERTY 409 EAST 35th STREET CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA DATE: JOB NO: REVISION NO: FIGURE NO: 12-28-15 0 1ELP-002 0 2000 4000 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEETN U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP QUADRANGLE 7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) CHARLOTTE EAST NC., 1967 PHOTOREVISED 1988 DERITA, NC., 1993 SITE 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100 Charlotte, NC 28203 704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) SA M P L E L O C A T I O N M A P In d u s t r i a l W a r e h o u s e P r o p e r t y 40 9 E a s t 3 5 th St r e e t Ch a r l o t t e , N o r t h C a r o l i n a DA T E : JO B N O : E L P - 0 0 2 REVISION NO:FIGURE NO: 2 12 - 2 8 - 1 5 0 0 10 0 20 0 AP P R O X I M A T E S C A L E I N F E E T N 29 2 3 S . T r y o n S t r e e t , S u i t e 1 0 0 Ch a r l o t t e , N C 2 8 2 0 3 70 4 . 5 8 6 . 00 0 7 ( p ) 70 4 . 5 8 6 . 0 37 3 ( f ) Pr o p e r t y Bo u n d a r y So i l Bo r i n g / T e m p o r a r y Mo n i t o r i n g We l l Lo c a t i o n (2 0 1 5 ) So i l Bo r i n g Lo c a t i o n (2 0 0 7 ) SB ‐6/ T M W ‐1 SB ‐7/ T M W ‐02 SB ‐8/ T M W ‐3 SB ‐9 SB ‐3 SB ‐2 SB ‐1 SB ‐5 SB ‐4 Appendix A Boring Logs GRAVEL Slightly moist, stiff, dull red clayey SILT with trace gravels Moist, stiff, dull red gray and brown clayey SILT with slight odor Slightly moist, slightly stiff, gray brown SILT with slight odor (low dust no chatter) Moist, slightly stiff, gray brown SILT with trace sand (low dust no chatter) Moist, stiff, dull red and gray SILT (low dust no chatter) Very moist, stiff tan SILT (low dust no chatter) Very moist, stiff tan SILT (no dust and no chatter) Wet, stiff tan SILT with partially weathered rock (no dust and no chatter) Bottom of borehole at 38.0 feet. 1" PVCRiser BentoniteSeal Filter SandPack 0.010" PVC SlottedScreen 5.8 3.6 8.9 3.1 1.7 3.5 1 1.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:12/10/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:SIMCO 2800 HS / Air Rotary SAMPLING METHOD:Air Rotary Cuttings Installed temporary monitoring wellscreened from 23'-38' bgs. BORING STARTED:12/10/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 38 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: 14.83 ft. DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t ) LI T H O L O G Y MATERIAL DESCRIPTION BORING DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) SA M P . RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R BK G . Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER SB-6/TMW-1 PROJECT:Noda Site JOB NUMBER:ELP-002 LOCATION:Charlotte, NC BO R I N G L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 1 2 / 1 1 / 1 5 1 1 : 1 8 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ E M P - 0 0 2 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 ASPHALT GRAVEL with trace dry loose black sandy SILT Moist, stiff, dark brown clayey SILT with Moist, very stiff, dull red and brown clayey SILT Very moist, very stiff, dull red and brown clayey SILT Very moist, dull red brown SILT with trace sand Very moist, stiff dull red SILT (low dust no chatter) Very moist, stiff tan SILT (low dust no chatter) Very moist, hard, gray and tan sandy SILT (low dust little chatter) Wet, soft, gray and tan sandy SILT with partially weathered rock (low dust little chatter) Saturated, soft, gray and tan sandy SILT with partially weathered rock (no dust little chatter) Bottom of borehole at 30.0 feet. 1" PVCRiser Bentonite Seal Filter SandPack 0.010" PVC SlottedScreen 0.5 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.6 1.8 1.2 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:12/10/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:SIMCO 2800 HS / Air Rotary SAMPLING METHOD:Air Rotary Cuttings Installed temporary monitoring wellscreened from 20'-30' bgs. BORING STARTED:12/10/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 30 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: 16.49 ft. DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t ) LI T H O L O G Y MATERIAL DESCRIPTION BORING DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) SA M P . RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R BK G . Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER SB-7/TMW-2 PROJECT:Noda Site JOB NUMBER:ELP-002 LOCATION:Charlotte, NC BO R I N G L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 1 2 / 1 1 / 1 5 1 1 : 1 8 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ E M P - 0 0 2 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 ASPHALT GRAVEL with wood debris and black loose sandy silt Moist, stiff, tan brown clayey SILT Moist, stiff, tan brown clayey SILT with partially weathered rock Moist, stiff, red and tan clayey SILT with partially weathered rock Very moist, stiff, tan brown SILT Very moist, very stiff, brown SILT (moderate dust and medium chatter) Very moist, hard, tan and gray SILT with trace sand and partiallyweathered rock and slight odor (low dust and medium chatter) Wet, hard, tan gray sandy SILT with partially weathered rock withodor (low dust and medium chatter) Wet, hard, tan gray sandy SILT with trace clay and partiallyweathered rock with odor (no dust and low chatter) Bottom of borehole at 30.0 feet. 1" PVCRiser Bentonite Seal Filter SandPack 0.010" PVC SlottedScreen 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.6 6.1 15.3 7.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:12/10/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:SIMCO 2800 HS / Air Rotary SAMPLING METHOD:Air Rotary Cuttings Installed temporary monitoring wellscreened from 20'-30' bgs. BORING STARTED:12/10/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 30 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: 19.08 ft. DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t ) LI T H O L O G Y MATERIAL DESCRIPTION BORING DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) SA M P . RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R BK G . Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER SB-8/TMW-3 PROJECT:Noda Site JOB NUMBER:ELP-002 LOCATION:Charlotte, NC BO R I N G L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 1 2 / 1 1 / 1 5 1 1 : 1 8 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ E M P - 0 0 2 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 ASPHALT GRAVEL with trace dry loose black sandy silt Slightly moist, loose, gray sandySILT with trace gravel Moist, stiff, reddish brown SILT (suspected fill) Very moist, stiff, tan SILT Bottom of borehole at 8.0 feet. 0.9 0.6 1.1 0.7 0 0 0 0 DRAWN BY:KJW BORING COMPLETED:12/10/15 DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Carolina Soil Investigations Remarks: DRILL RIG/ METHOD:SIMCO 2800 HS / Hand Auger SAMPLING METHOD:Auger Cuttings Installed temporary monitoring wellscreened from 20'-30' bgs. BORING STARTED:12/10/15 LOGGED BY:KJW TOTAL DEPTH: 8 ft. TOP OF CASING ELEV: DEPTH TO WATER: DE P T H (f t ) DE P T H (f t ) LI T H O L O G Y MATERIAL DESCRIPTION BORING DIAGRAM OV A ( p p m ) SA M P . RE C O V E R Y ( % ) SA M P L E T Y P E NU M B E R BK G . Sheet 1 of 1 BORING NUMBER SB-9 PROJECT:Noda Site JOB NUMBER:ELP-002 LOCATION:Charlotte, NC BO R I N G L O G - H A R T H I C K M A N . G D T - 1 2 / 1 1 / 1 5 1 1 : 1 8 - S : \ A A A - M A S T E R G I N T P R O J E C T S \ E M P - 0 0 2 . G P J 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) 3334 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 Appendix B Laboratory Analytical Data Reports • March 2007 Analytical Data • December 2015 Analytical Data ANALYTICAL REPORT TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. TestAmerica Nashville 2960 Foster Creighton Drive Nashville, TN 37204 Tel:(615)726-0177 TestAmerica Job ID: 490-93972-1 TestAmerica Sample Delivery Group: ELP-002 Client Project/Site: Noda Site For: Hart & Hickman, PC 2923 S Tryon Street Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 Attn: Matt Ingalls Authorized for release by: 12/18/2015 3:06:58 PM Ken Hayes, Project Manager II (615)301-5035 ken.hayes@testamericainc.com The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accreditedparameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full,and with written approval from the laboratory. For questions please contact the Project Managerat the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page. This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature isintended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature. Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s) as received by the laboratory. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Table of Contents Client: Hart & Hickman, PC Project/Site: Noda Site TestAmerica Job ID: 490-93972-1 SDG: ELP-002 Page 2 of 70 TestAmerica Nashville12/18/2015 Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 Case Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34 QC Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .60 Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63 Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .66 Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67 Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .68 Receipt Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .70 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 3 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 4 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 5 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 6 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 7 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 8 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 9 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 10 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 11 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 12 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 13 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 14 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 15 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 16 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 17 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 18 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 19 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 20 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 21 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 22 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 23 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 24 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 25 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 26 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 27 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 28 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 29 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 30 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 31 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 32 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 33 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 34 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 35 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 36 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 37 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 38 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 39 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 40 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 41 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 42 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 43 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 44 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 45 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 46 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 47 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 48 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 49 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 50 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 51 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 52 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 53 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 54 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 55 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 56 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 57 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 58 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 59 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 60 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 61 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 62 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 63 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 64 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 65 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 66 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 67 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 68 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 69 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Page 70 of 70 12/18/2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13