Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20023_Sealtest Dairy_GW Assessment Report_2016.03.25 Groundwater Assessment Report ECS Carolinas, LLP 4811 Koger Boulevard Greensboro, North Carolina 27407 (336) 856-7150 Former Sealtest Dairy, 2115 Highway 70 SE, Hickory, Catawba County, NC ECS Project No. 49.1624A ECS Project No. 24839C Prepared for: Insite Real Estate, LLC Oak Brook, IL Groundwater Assessment Report Former Sealtest Dairy 2115 Highway 70 Southeast Hickory, Catawba County, North Carolina ECS Project No. 49.1624A March 25, 2016 March 25, 2016 Mr. Dan Uebelhor InSite Real Estate, LLC 1400 16th Street Suite 300 Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 Reference: Groundwater Assessment Report Former Sealtest Dairy 2115 Highway 70 Southeast Hickory, Catawba County, North Carolina ECS Project No. 49.1624A Dear Mr. Uebelhor: As authorized by your acceptance of our Proposal 49.639P dated March 4, 2016, ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) has completed our Groundwater Assessment Report for the above referenced site. Included in this report is a description of the field activities, the results obtained, and our conclusions and recommendations. ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide our services to you. If there are questions regarding this report, or a need for further information, please contact us at (336) 856-7150. Respectfully submitted, ECS CAROLINAS, LLP John M. Stewart, P.G. Chief Geologist John Lair, P.G. Director of Environmental Services Groundwater Assessment Report Former Sealtest Dairy 2115 Highway 70 Southeast Hickory, Catawba County, North Carolina ECS Project No. 49.1624A March 25, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SITE INFORMATION ................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES ..................................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 RESULTS .................................................................................................................................................. 4 4.0 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 4 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................................. 5 6.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF REPORT .................................................................................................................. 5 FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Map Figure 3 Sample Location Map TABLES Table 1 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results APPENDIX Appendix A Boring Log and Well Construction Diagram Appendix B Laboratory Data Sheets and Chain-of-Custody Record Groundwater Assessment Report Former Sealtest Dairy 2115 Highway 70 Southeast Hickory, Catawba County, North Carolina ECS Project No. 49.1624A March 25, 2016 1 1.0 SITE INFORMATION The site is located at 2115 Highway 70 SE in Hickory, Catawba County, North Carolina (Figure 1 and Figure 2). ECS recently completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the site in September 2105 (ECS Project No. 09.26039). The site consists of an approximate 1.45 acre tract identified as Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 371107792430. The site currently contains an approximate 3,680 square foot commercial building, occupied by Direct TV and an automobile repair business (southern portion of the site); two single family residences (northern portion of the site); asphalt parking areas; and, landscaped areas. The commercial building was reportedly occupied by various commercial businesses, including Old Sealtest Dairy and DRR Properties, LLC and Harold King. The Direct TV portion of the building contained offices and storage areas. The automotive repair portion of the building contained an automotive repair bay/workshop and a restroom. De minimis staining was observed on the concrete floor in this area; however, floor drains were not observed in the building and the spilled material had not left the concrete. According to interviews, the automobile repair business had been located on the site for approximately three months. Based on this information, the automobile repair business was not considered a recognized environmental condition (REC) for the site. An automobile repair facility was reportedly located on adjoining property east of the site from at least 1992 to 1999. Based on the proximity to the site, a release from this property could impact the site. Therefore, ECS concluded the former automobile repair facility represented a REC for the site. A regulatory database search report was provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). The EDR report identified the Old Sealtest Dairy site as having a documented release. We reviewed the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) file for this incident. According to information in the file, a release was discovered during the removal of a 6,000 gallon gasoline UST, a 5,000 gallon gasoline UST, a 1,100 gallon diesel UST, and a 550 gallon fuel oil UST March 1997. Laboratory analysis of confirmation soil samples collected from the base of the excavations indicated that total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) were detected above state action levels. Approximately 50 cubic yards of petroleum impacted soil was removed from the former UST basins in September 1997. Laboratory analysis of confirmation soil samples did not identify petroleum constituents above detection limits. The NCDEQ issued a No Further Action letter for this incident, dated October 28, 2003. A soil and groundwater assessment was performed in October 2013 by Geological Resources, Inc. (GRI) in the area where the dispenser for the former gasoline USTs was located. The gasoline USTs and dispenser were located along the east side of the property. Laboratory analysis of soil and groundwater collected during the investigation did not detect petroleum compounds above detection limits in the soil or groundwater; however, tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichlorofluoromethane were discovered in the groundwater sample. PCE was detected above its respective 15A NCAC 02L Groundwater Quality Standards (NC2L standards). Trichlorofluoromethane was detected below the NC2L standard. The incident was transferred to the Inactive Hazardous Site Branch (IHSB) due to the presence of Perc in the groundwater above the NC2L standard. Based on information in the file, additional assessment had not been performed since 2003. The PCE impacted groundwater represented a REC of the site. Groundwater Assessment Report Former Sealtest Dairy 2115 Highway 70 Southeast Hickory, Catawba County, North Carolina ECS Project No. 49.1624A March 25, 2016 2 In November 2015, ECS collected two groundwater samples using a direct push rig in the area of the former USTs (previous sample of MW-1) and in what is believed to be the downgradient direction (based on surface topography). The samples were submitted to Research and Analytical Laboratory (R&A) in Kernersville, North Carolina for chemical analysis for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) using EPA Method 8260 and semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) using EPA Method 8270BNA (base neutrals and acid extractable). Laboratory analysis of groundwater samples GWB1 and GWB2 did not detect VOCs or SVOCs above laboratory quantitation limits. The information was presented to the North Carolina Division of Waster Management, Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) for review and consideration of writing a No List Letter. The IHSB requested a groundwater sample be collected from the top of rock and analyzed for VOCs prior to making a closure determination. ECS was contracted by Mr. Dan Uebelhor with InSite Real Estate, LLC to install a monitoring to the top of rock and collect a groundwater sample per the IHSB request.. 2.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES 2.1 Introduction to Scope of Work The groundwater assessment consisted of drilling a soil boring to install a permanent monitoring and to collect a groundwater sample using a Geoprobe® drill rig. The drilling contractor used for this project was Quantex, Inc. 2.2 Utility Clearance Prior to commencing with field activities, ECS contacted NC One-Call to locate and mark public utilities at the site. ECS also contracted with a private utility locator to locate private underground utilities at each parcel. Required separation distances between subsurface activities and marked utilities (typically 30-inches) were maintained during the field activities. 2.3 Geoprobe® Drilling Services The Geoprobe® consists of various drilling platforms an all-terrain vehicle (ATV). The Geoprobe® used was capable of drilling with both hollow-stem augers and various forms of groundwater and soil sampling probes into the ground to depths equivalent of auger refusal. Groundwater Assessment Report Former Sealtest Dairy 2115 Highway 70 Southeast Hickory, Catawba County, North Carolina ECS Project No. 49.1624A March 25, 2016 3 2.3.1 Geoprobe® Soil Boring The soil boring for the monitoring well was advanced using hollow-stem augers. The location of the soil boring is shown on Figure 2. Prior to advancing the boring, the down hole equipment and Geoprobe® drill rig were decontaminated utilizing a high pressure steam cleaner that utilized municipal water. The down hole equipment and drill rig were decontaminated to prevent cross-contamination between drilling locations. 2.3.2 Soil Sample Collection and Preparation The auger cuttings were visually classified and screened for relative levels of volatile organic vapors using a Thermo 2020 flame ionization detector (FID). Copy of the boring log and FID readings are in included in Appendix A. 2.3.3 Monitoring Well Installation The boring for the monitoring well was drilled to a depth of 90 feet below land surface where refusal was encountered. The well was constructed with 2-inch I.D. Schedule 40 PVC flushed-threaded casing and screen. The PVC screen and casing were lowered to the bottom of each borehole. A 5-foot length of slotted well screen with machined 0.010-inch slot widths and threaded bottom plug were installed at the bottom of each well. A solid section of PVC casing was placed above the screened interval flush with the ground surface. The annular space around well screen was filled with washed fine filter sand to approximately two feet above the top of the screen. A minimum two foot thick seal of bentonite pellets was placed immediately above the sand pack. The remaining annular space was filled with grout. A protected flush mount well cover was set over the well. The top of the well casing was equipped with a lockable, water-tight well plug. The monitoring well construction diagram is included in Appendix A. 2.3.4 Groundwater Sample Collection and Preparation Approximately 24 hours after installation, the monitoring well was purged using a dedicated polyethylene bailer and nylon cord. The well was developed/purged by evacuating a minimum of five well volumes. The well was developed/purged to remove sand, silt and other fine sediments which may have entered the well during construction and to promote communication between the surrounding formation and the sand pack surrounding the well’s screened interval. After the purging was completed, a groundwater sample was collected and transferred into sample containers provided by the laboratory. The sampler placed the samples in laboratory prepared containers. Each container was labeled and placed in a cooler containing ice to maintain the samples at approximately 4 Celsius. The samples were hand delivered to R&A to be analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method 8260. A Chain of Custody Record was maintained and is included in Appendix B. Groundwater Assessment Report Former Sealtest Dairy 2115 Highway 70 Southeast Hickory, Catawba County, North Carolina ECS Project No. 49.1624A March 25, 2016 4 3.0 RESULTS Laboratory analysis of the groundwater sample detected chloroform above the laboratory quantitation limits but not its NC2L standard Laboratory analysis of the groundwater sample detected PCE at a concentration of 1.83 ppb which is above its NC2L standard. A summary of the groundwater analytical results is presented in Table 1. The laboratory data sheets are included in Appendix B. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS Laboratory analysis of the groundwater sample collected from the monitoring well detected low concentrations (1.83 ppb) of PCE above its NC2L standard. Analysis of the shallow well installed in this location in 2003 detected 2.2 ppb of PCE and the analysis of two shallow groundwater samples collected in the same area in 2015 did not detect PCE above laboratory detection limits. As the data indicates, the presence of PCE in both the shallow and deeper portion of the aquifer is intermittent and very low. The data does not support a deep plume of dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL). As we have presented in previous reports, there is no reported source of PCE on the subject site (past milk distributor, commercial retail, residential); however, an automobile repair garage was located on the adjoining property east of the site from at least 1992 to 1999 (probably longer). The monitoring well/groundwater sample locations are five feet from the eastern property line and within ten feet of the former garage building, whereas the onsite building is located approximately 50 from the well/sample locations. It is our opinion that the source of the PCE is from the garage on the adjoining property, as metal degreasers and/or parts washers used in the garage could have contained PCE. In May 2012, the EPA updated the IRIS database with recent scientific information that indicates that PCE is significantly less carcinogenic than previously thought. The current NC2L standard of 0.7 ppb is based on an earlier EPA determination of the 1 x 10-6 cancer risk level. In May 2014, as part of EPA’s draft update of the recommended water quality criteria, EPA published a report on PCE indicating that the 1 x 10-6 cancer risk level for PCE is 10 ppb, replacing the prior estimate (Draft Update of Human Health Ambient Water Quality Criteria: Tetrachloroethylene (2014), at http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/criteria/current/upload/Draft-Update-of-Human- Health-Ambient-Water-Quality-Criteria-Tetrachloroethylene.pdf). On June 29, 2015, EPA issued its final recommended water quality criteria, including the higher PCE standard. EPA, Final Updated Ambient Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Human Health, 80 Fed. Reg. 36,986, at 36,988 (June 29, 2015). Because EPA has increased the PCE 1 x 10-6 cancer risk level to 10 ppb, we expect the state groundwater quality standard to rise to the MCL of 5 ppb during DENR’s next triennial groundwater standards review. Note that the EPA’s Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for drinking water is already 5 ppb. When the NC2L standard for PCE rises to 5 ppb, the detected concentrations of PCE will no longer violate the standard, as PCE has not been detected at or above 5 ppb. We understand the triennial review is scheduled to be completed in 2016. Groundwater Assessment Report Former Sealtest Dairy 2115 Highway 70 Southeast Hickory, Catawba County, North Carolina ECS Project No. 49.1624A March 25, 2016 5 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS In light of the very low concentrations of PCE detected on the site, low to no risk to receptors (nearest reported wells (not in use) were 600 feet northwest of the site in 2003) and vapor intrusion concerns are nonexistent based on the detected concentrations of PCE, the site is in a commercial area, the EPA’s MCL of 5 ppb for drinking water, no known source of PCE on the site but a likely source on the adjoining property, and the willingness of the client to place groundwater use restrictions on the property; we are requesting the IHSB issue a no list letter for incident on this property. If the IHSB does not agree with our recommendation, and InSite Real Estate, LLC (InSite) wished to continue with development of the property, ECS recommends that InSite consider developing the property under a North Carolina Brownfields Agreement. 6.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF REPORT The activities and evaluative approaches used in this assessment are consistent with those normally employed in environmental assessment projects of this type. Our evaluation of site conditions has been based on our understanding of the site project information and the data obtained during our field activities. This report was prepared for the express use of InSite Real Estate, LLC. Use of this report by other individuals or companies implies their acceptance of the General Conditions of Service of the original contract.                                                               FIGURES SOURCE: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP HICKORY, NORTH CAROLINA QUADRANGLE, DATED 1993 FIGURE 1 SITE LOCATION MAP 2115 HIGHWAY 70 SE HICKORY, CATAWBA COUNTY, NC ECS PROJECT NO. 49-1624A SITE APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY 2,000’ SOURCE: CATAWBA COUNTY GIS WEBSITE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH, DATED 2014 FIGURE 2 SITE MAP 2115 HIGHWAY 70 SE HICKORY, CATAWBA COUNTY, NC ECS PROJECT NO. 49-1624A LEGEND CURRENT/FORMER AUTO REPAIR BUSINESS APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY A 200’ A SOURCE: CATAWBA COUNTY GIS WEBSITE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH, DATED 2014 SCALE = NTS FIGURE 3 SAMPLE LOCATION MAP 2115 HIGHWAY 70 SE HICKORY, CATAWBA COUNTY, NC ECS PROJECT NO. 49-1624A MW-1  Approximate Site Boundary                                                             TABLES Former Sealtest Dairy 2115 Highway 70 SE Hickory, Catawba County, North Carolina ECS Project 49.1624A TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS Parameter ANALYTICAL RESULTS Location MW-1 Date Sampled 3/10/16 Chloroform 1.35 70 Tetrachloroethene 1.83 0.7 Notes: Concentrations are presented in milligrams per liter, analagous to parts per million 2L Standard = 15 A NCAC 2L.0202 Water Quality Standard Bold = Concentration exceeds the 2L Standard BQL = Below the laboratory quantitation limit of the method of analysis 2L Standard VOCs by 8260                                                             APPENDIX A 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 16.76 18.32 18.77 16.81 14.32 12.71 11.78 dark red brown silt brown silt light brown silt dark brown silt brown silt PROJECT:Former Sealtest Dairy MONITORING WELL NO.MW-1 CLIENT:InSite Real Estate, LLC PROJECT NO.49-1624A LOCATION: 2115 Highway 70 SE, Hickory, North Carolina ELEVATION: DRILLER: Quantex DATE DRILLED: 3/9/16 LOGGED BY: Randy Cavallier DRILL RIG: Geoprobe with Hollow Stem Augers DEPTH TO WATER: 44.30' Elevation/ Depth (Ft)PI D Re a d i n g Sa m p l e Nu m b e r Sa m p l e Re c o v e r y (i n / i n ) Gr a p h i c L o g So i l Cla s s i f i c a t i o n SOIL DESCRIPTION WELL CONSTRUCTION Th i s i n f o r m a t i o n p e r t a i n s o n l y t o t h i s b o r i n g a n d s h o u l d n o t b e i n te r p r e t e d a s b e i n g i n d i c a t i v e o f th e s i t e . Figure Page 1 of 3 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 11.98 11.84 10.91 10.99 10.53 10.66 ML brown silt brown wet silt silt mud PROJECT:Former Sealtest Dairy Monitoring Well No.MW-1 CLIENT:InSite Real Estate, LLC Project No.49-1624A LOCATION: 2115 Highway 70 SE, Hickory, North Carolina ELEVATION: DRILLER: Quantex DATE DRILLED: 3/9/16 LOGGED BY: Randy Cavallier DRILL RIG: Geoprobe with Hollow Stem Augers DEPTH TO WATER>FIRST: 44.30' COMPL.: 44.30' Elevation/ Depth (Ft)PI D Re a d i n g Sa m p l e Nu m b e r Sa m p l e Re c o v e r y (i n / i n ) Gr a p h i c L o g So i l Cla s s i f i c a t i o n SOIL DESCRIPTION WELL CONSTRUCTION Th i s i n f o r m a t i o n p e r t a i n s o n l y t o t h i s b o r i n g a n d s h o u l d n o t b e i n te r p r e t e d a s b e i n g i n d i c a t i v e o f th e s i t e . Figure Page 2 of 3 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 ML silt mud PROJECT:Former Sealtest Dairy Monitoring Well No.MW-1 CLIENT:InSite Real Estate, LLC Project No.49-1624A LOCATION: 2115 Highway 70 SE, Hickory, North Carolina ELEVATION: DRILLER: Quantex DATE DRILLED: 3/9/16 LOGGED BY: Randy Cavallier DRILL RIG: Geoprobe with Hollow Stem Augers DEPTH TO WATER>FIRST: 44.30' COMPL.: 44.30' Elevation/ Depth (Ft)PI D Re a d i n g Sa m p l e Nu m b e r Sa m p l e Re c o v e r y (i n / i n ) Gr a p h i c L o g So i l Cla s s i f i c a t i o n SOIL DESCRIPTION WELL CONSTRUCTION Th i s i n f o r m a t i o n p e r t a i n s o n l y t o t h i s b o r i n g a n d s h o u l d n o t b e i n te r p r e t e d a s b e i n g i n d i c a t i v e o f th e s i t e . Figure Page 3 of 3                                                             APPENDIX B