09058_Midtown Mall_EMP_Rev1_20231130 final

November 30, 2023

Ms. Carolyn Minnich
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management, Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Mail Service Center 1646
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646

Subject: Environmental Management Plan (Revision 1)
Midtown Square Mall
1200 Metropolitan Avenue
Charlotte, North Carolina
Mid-Atlantic Project #H1824.00
Brownfields Project #09058-05-060

Dear Ms. Minnich:

On behalf of the NR Met Property Owner LP (the Prospective Developer), Mid-Atlantic
Associates, Inc. submits the attached Environmental Management Plan – Revision 1 for
the above-referenced property for the planned redevelopment of the Brownfields
property. If you have any questions concerning this submittal, please do not hesitate to
call us at [phone].

With best regards,

MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, INC.

Shane Sisco, P.G. Greg D. Icenhour, P.G., MBA
Project Hydrogeologist Principal Geologist

REPORT DATE: November 15, 2023
REVISED DATE: November 30, 2023
MID-ATLANTIC PROJECT #: H1824.00
BROWNFIELDS PROJECT #: 09058-05-060

Environmental Management Plan
Midtown Square Mall
1200 Metropolitan Avenue, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
PREPARED FOR:
NCDEQ Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Attn: Carolyn Minnich
Mail Service Center 1646
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
PREPARED BY:
Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc.
1125 E. Morehead Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, North Carolina 28204
[phone] | MAAONLINE.COM

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NCDEQ EMP Form

APPENDICES

Appendix A Redevelopment Plans
Appendix B Grading Plan
Appendix C Historical Analytical Tables and Figures

1
EMP Version 3, March 2023
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Redevelopment Section at the direction of a Brownfields
project manager.

The EMP is a standard requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an effort
to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory-compliant
decision-making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.

Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development-related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the EMP to be valid for use, it must be
completed, reviewed by the Section, signed by all parties working on the project, and
approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of the
EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a recorded agreement, be cause for
a reopener.

The EMP is valid only for the scope of work described herein and must be updated to be
applicable for new phases of redevelopment or after significant changes in applicable
regulatory guidance. Risk characterization of a Brownfields Property to DEQ’s written
satisfaction is required prior to EMP approval.

Voluntary Metrics Tab The NC Brownfields Redevelopment Section updates estimated capital investment (from the Brownfields Property Application) and estimated jobs created (from the Brownfields Agreement) whenever possible. As a voluntary measure, you may opt to complete the below information for capital investment and jobs created as estimated by your final redevelopment
plans for the Brownfields Property:
1. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: Click or tap here to enter text. 2. Estimated jobs created:
a. Construction Jobs: Click or tap here to enter text.
b. Full Time Post-Redevelopment Jobs: Click or tap here to enter text.

2
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Table of Contents
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION .................................................................. 1
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................................................................... 1
GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................ 4
COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 4
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION ..................................................... 5
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS ........................................................................................................................ 5
CONTAMINATED MEDIA ......................................................................................................................... 7
PART 1. SOIL ........................................................................................................................................ 8
PART 2. GROUNDWATER .................................................................................................................. 18
PART 3. SURFACE WATER .................................................................................................................. 20
PART 4. SEDIMENT ............................................................................................................................ 20
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR ......................................................................................................................... 21
PART 6. INDOOR AIR ......................................................................................................................... 22
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM ............................................................................................. 22
CONTINGENCY PLAN ............................................................................................................................. 23
POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING..................................................................................................... 25
APPROVAL SIGNATURES ....................................................................................................................... 27

3
EMP Version 3, March 2023
So that the EMP provides value in protecting Brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing all of the following is premature and may
be returned without comment.

☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields project manager.
☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields project manager.

Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:

☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not, conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.

☒ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.

☒ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.

☐ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
onsite after construction grading.

☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).

☐ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.

☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☐ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.

☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
Brownfields approval.

☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for import to the Brownfields Property.

4
EMP Version 3, March 2023

☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Guidelines.

☐ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.

☒ If a Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) is required by the Brownfields
Redevelopment Section, the VIMS plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.

GENERAL INFORMATION

Date: Revision Date (if applicable)

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Midtown Square Mall

Brownfields Project Number: 09058-05-060

Brownfields Property Address: 1200 Metropolitan Avenue, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC

Brownfields Property Area (acres): The site includes one approximate 1.3 acre parcel (Parcel ID #
12522705) of land. A topographic site location map is provided in figures included in Appendix C.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.

COMMUNICATIONS

A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities in an area that is
prominently accessible to site workers. NOTE, THE EMP DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE-SPECIFIC
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.
Prospective Developer (PD): NR Met Property Owner LP
Contact Person: Kyle Whitaker
[phone] [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5
EMP Version 3, March 2023

Contractor for PD: NWR Construction, LLC
Contact Person: Click or tap here to enter text.
[phone] Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: Click or tap here to enter text.

Environmental Consultant: Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc.
Contact Person: Shane Sisco, P.G.
[phone] [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Brownfields Redevelopment Section Project Manager: Carolyn Minnich
Phone Numbers: Office: Mobile:
Email: [e-mail]

Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
Click or tap here to enter text.

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields project manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:

On-site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior ☒

Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior ☒

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours ☒

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours ☒

Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior ☒

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days ☒

REDEVELOPMENT PLANS

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☒Residential ☐Townhomes (Prior written DEQ approval REQUIRED regardless of ownership

6
EMP Version 3, March 2023
structure) ☐Recreational ☐Institutional ☐Commercial ☐Office ☒Retail ☐Industrial
☐Other specify:
Click or tap here to enter text.

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth-moving activities
at the site:
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
☒ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
☐ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
Midtown Park and the Little Sugar Creek Greenway. Redevelopment plans for the site include
grading activities and the construction of a mixed-use podium-style multifamily residential
structure, accessory retail space and associated parking deck. Once completed, the proposed
redevelopment will include ±415,000SF of multifamily residential and associated
amenities/service areas, ±190,000SF of parking and ±4,000SF of retail space in a 27-story
structure. A copy of the most recent Redevelopment Site Plan is included in Appendix A and a
Appendix B

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
☐ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.

5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
S&EC requirements can be found at: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-and-land-
resources/erosion-and-sediment-control/erosion-and-sediment-control-laws-and-rules
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that earth-work will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.

6) Which category of risk-based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
☒ Residential ☐ Non-Residential or Industrial/Commercial

7
EMP Version 3, March 2023

7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 1/8/2024

b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):

c) Additional phases planned? ☐ Yes ☒ No

If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: Q4 2024

CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Please fill out the sections below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas
of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure overlaying new
construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown
Part 2. Groundwater: .................................... ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown
Part 3. Surface Water: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown ☐ N/A
Part 4. Sediment: .......................................... ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown ☐ N/A
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ......................................... ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown
Part 6. Sub-Slab Soil Vapor: .......................... ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Suspected ☐ Unknown
Part 7. Indoor Air: ......................................... ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Suspected ☐ Unknown

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.

8
EMP Version 3, March 2023
PART 1. SOIL
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
The Brownfields property does not consist of any current structures and is predominantly
undeveloped land/green space. A tabular summary of available soil sample analytical data
exceeding NCDEQ Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals
(PSRGs) and historical site figures are included as Appendix C. A brief summary of the soil
assessment results is provided below.

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Laboratory analytical results indicate that low levels of several VOCs have been detected in soil
samples collected at the site at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limits. Of
the VOCs, only tetrachloroethylene (PCE) was detected above the Residential PSRG in one soil
sample (SV-3; 0.59 mg/kg) from a depth interval of 4 to 6 ft bgs. Remaining detections are below
NCDEQ regulatory standards.

Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
Laboratory analytical results indicate that SVOCs were not detected at concentrations exceeding
Residential PSRGs in soil samples collected at the Brownfields property.

Metals
Background soil samples collected during assessment activities conducted on the Brownfields
property identified several metals at concentrations consistent with naturally occurring levels in
the site area. The metals concentration detected in the background samples are considered site

2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Based on results of Brownfields soil assessment activities, compound concentrations in soil
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
Based on the grading plan (Appendix B), the entire site will undergo some level of soil
disturbance during the construction period, which totals an approximate area of 57,000 square
feet. Soil will be disturbed as part of leveling and grading activities to prepare the site for
construction of the proposed podium-style structure. Additional disturbance is expected as part

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
Most of the soil disturbance is surficial in nature for development of utilities and building
foundations. The podium-style residential structure is planned to be constructed on grade. As
such, excavation in this area is anticipated to be less than 10 ft bgs. However, deep foundations
(~40 ft bgs) will be drilled via auger methods and spoils will be generated during the construction

9
EMP Version 3, March 2023
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
There is limited space on the Brownfields property to stockpile soil spoils generated during deep
foundation drilling. Although the site is anticipated to be a net-import project, spoils generated
will need to be exported off-site to avoid construction delays. According to the grading plan
(Appendix B), it is anticipated that approximately 1,100 cubic yards of excess soil will be
excavated during grading and utility trenching activities. An additional 3,700 to 4,000 cubic yards
are estimated to be generated from deep foundation drilling. It is anticipated that excavated
material for grading can be re-used on-site and will be covered with impervious surface.
However, based on the space available, nature of deep foundation drilling, and maintaining the

6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
Soil sampling has not been conducted across the redevelopment footprint at depths
corresponding with the deep foundation drilling. As such, the volume of contaminants is
unknown. The PD plans to dispose of all material generated during deep foundation drilling at a
Subtitle D MSWLF to 1) avoid the need to stockpile in a limited area and 2) avoid sampling delays

7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
Spoils generated during deep foundation drilling that are planned for off-site disposal at a

PART 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ☐Yes ☒No
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).

☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained-Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained-In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes ☐ No

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED-OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED-IN POLICY, THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ONSITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND

10
EMP Version 3, March 2023
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes ☐ No
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
☐ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)

☒ If no, explain rationale:
Laboratory analysis of soil samples collected during previous assessment
activities did not identify compound concentrations at characteristically
hazardous levels or levels which exceed TCLP criteria using the Rule of 20. If soils
are disturbed during grading which are suspected to contain concentrations
above hazardous waste levels [based on visual observation or field screening
with a properly calibrated photoionization detector (PID)], the soil will be

d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ONSITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH
DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
☒ Preliminary Health-Based Residential SRGs
☐ Preliminary Health-Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
☒ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
☐ Site-specific risk-based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Click or tap here to enter text.

Additional comments:
Click or tap here to enter text.

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property boundary,

11
EMP Version 3, March 2023
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields project manager.
☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil onsite map to
Brownfields project manager once known.
☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☐
☐Describe cap or fill:
Any documented impacted soils will be covered with impervious surfaces (asphalt pavement,
sidewalks, access roads, buildings, etc.) or a minimum of 2 feet of documented clean fill during

☒ Confer with NC BF project manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-recorded if
actions are Post-Recordation).
☒ GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
☒ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:

4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
☒ Check to confirm that management of fugitive dust from site activities will be handled in
accordance with applicable local, state, and federal requirements.

Field screening of site soil
At a minimum, contractors shall be made aware of protocols should impacted soils (e.g. staining,
unusual odors, fill materials) be identified.

Describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting field
screening:
However, during soil disturbance at the site, the workers or contractors will observe soils
for evidence of potential significantly impacted soil. Evidence of potential significantly
impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously
disposed materials of concerns (i.e., chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be
noted during site work, the contractor will contact the project environmental
If contaminated soil is generated during grading, foundation, or utility installation, it will be

12
EMP Version 3, March 2023
implemented. In addition, the environmental engineer will contact the NCDEQ Brownfields

Soil sample collection
☐ Yes

☒ Not anticipated - In order to avoid delays in construction, a plan shall be in place for sampling
of suspect soils should they be encountered during redevelopment. If soil sample collection is
not anticipated but the need to do so is identified during redevelopment, notify the Brownfields
project manager of the anticipated sample and report dates for scheduling purposes.

Describe the sampling method (e.g., in-situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.) and confirm that all
procedures outlined in applicable DEQ guidance for assessment shall be followed Typically, at
least one representative sample (per 500 yd3 for residential and 1,000 yd3 for commercial)
consisting of a 3 to 5-point composite sample with grab sample for VOCs based on the highest PID
reading is required to determine soil management options:

Additional soil sampling is not planned based on the results of historical soil sampling
activities. If previously unknown significant soil impact is encountered during
grading and/or installation or removal of utilities, excavation will proceed only as far as
needed to allow grading and/or construction of the utility to continue and/or only as far
as needed to allow alternate corrective measures described below. Suspect significantly
impacted soil excavated during grading and/or utility line installation or removal may be
stockpiled and covered in a secure area to allow construction to progress. Suspect
impacted soil will be underlain by and covered with minimum 10-mil plastic sheeting. At
least one representative soil sample (no less than 3 aliquot soil samples at a sample ratio
of 1 soil sample per every approximately 1,000 cubic yards of soil will be collected for
analysis of total VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals. If the results of analysis of the sample
indicate that the soil could potentially exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous waste
criteria, then the soil will also be analyzed by TCLP for those compounds that could
exceed the toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria. Impacted soil will be managed
as outlined in the NCDEQ-provided table below, which outlines permitted options based
on impacts detected.

Impacted soil may be transported to a permitted Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (MSWL)
only. All other permitted disposal facilities (i.e., land clearing/inert debris and
construction/demolition landfills) would require prior written NCDEQ approval. If soil is
transported to a MSWL, the MSWL’s written approval to dispose of soil from the site will
be included in the final redevelopment report. In the unlikely event that the sample data
indicates concentrations above TCLP hazardous waste criteria, then the soil must be

13
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Check applicable chemical analytes for soil samples:
☒ Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method
8260; Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA
List + Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides):

☒ Check to confirm that by the owner’s signature and the North Carolina Professional
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect
soil sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the
sealing professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines and
methodologies are followed and reported to DEQ for determination and approval of soil
placement prior to final relocation.

If impacted soils above applicable PSRGs and/or site specific risk thresholds are proposed to be
relocated on-site, prior to final placement on-site, the following shall be submitted for DEQ
review/approval
- Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the above referenced frequency and
following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum Requirements Checklist (Checklist) and in
accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of Contaminated Sites
(Guidelines)
- Figure outlining planned soil placement and any future site features including
buildings/hardscape/open areas
- A North Carolina PE/PG recommendation of placement

Impacts
Options
Onsite Placement without
conditions
Onsite placement under 2 ft
of cap or clean fill1, 2
All Constituents below applicable
PSRGs X
Constituents3 below applicable
PSRGs; Metals below background X
Constituents3 below applicable
PSRGs; Metals above Background X
Constituents above Applicable
PSRGs X

1: Requires Prior Written DEQ Approval

14
EMP Version 3, March 2023
2: VOC impacted soils above applicable PSRGs shall not be placed directly beneath building footprints
without prior written DEQ approval.
3: Constituents indicate any samples evaluated for other than metals.

☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted in
accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion control,
prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing
contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as needed:

☐ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes below
(Check all that apply):
☐ Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method
8260; Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA
List + Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides):

Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, indicate if a work
plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale:
Based on the current site redevelopment plan and results of historical soil sampling
activities, a final grade sampling plan will not be necessary. The area of redevelopment on
the Brownfields property will predominantly include impervious surfaces such as sidewalks

PART 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL

NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM
THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION. According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written approval
in advance by the Brownfields Redevelopment Section), will safeguard the liability protections
Click or tap here to enter text.

15
EMP Version 3, March 2023
provided by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective
developer/property owner.”

Requirements for importing fill:
☒ Check to confirm that the import volumes outlined below have been confirmed based on
geotechnical evaluations.

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
Based on the cut/fill analysis included in Appendix B, it is estimated that approximately 1,870

3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range
of depths, list the range.)
Based on the cut/fill analysis included in Appendix B, it is estimated that fill material will be

PRIOR TO SOIL PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, a Soil Import Request must be
submitted for DEQ Brownfields review and approval. The request shall consist of a data
package that details:

- Fill source location/history (Phase I if available, current aerials, etc.)
- Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the below frequency and
following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum Requirements Checklist (Checklist)
and in accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of
Contaminated Sites (Guidelines)
- A table comparing the import soil to existing site concentrations
- A PE/PG recommendation of import
- All relevant attachments listed in the Checklist

Soil Import Sampling Requirements:
Virgin Material from DEQ
Brownfields Pre-None (Contact Brownfields project manager for list of pre-
approved Quarries
DEQ Permitted Quarry
(Not Brownfields Pre-
approved)
representative sample
from area of planned
Metals, any site specific
COCs (e.g. pesticides,
representative sample
per 1,000 yd3 consisting
of a 3-point composite
VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA
Metals, any site specific
COCs (e.g. pesticides,
PCBs, etc.) unpermitted/regulated

16
EMP Version 3, March 2023
from Commercial Vendor No Sampling Required

If other special considerations apply, discuss:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Check to confirm that by the owner’s signature and the North Carolina Professional
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect soil
sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the sealing professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines are followed and reported in
the Soil Import Request for DEQ approval. Failure to meet these requirements could result in
resampling and/or failure to approve import.

PART 1.C. SOIL EXPORT

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION. Failure to obtain approval may violate a brownfields
agreement causing a reopener or jeopardizing eligibility in the Section, endangering liability
protections and making said action possibly subject to enforcement. Justifications provided
below must be approved by the Section in writing prior to completing transport activities. Refer
to Brownfields IR 15 for additional details.

1) If export from the Brownfields Property is anticipated, export soil must be sampled at a
frequency of one sample per 1,000 yd3 consisting of a 3-point composite sample with a
grab sample for VOCs based on the highest PID reading. Samples shall be analyzed at a
minimum for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals plus any site specific COCs.

PRIOR TO EXPORT FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, a Soil Export Request must be
submitted for DEQ Brownfields review and approval. The request shall consist of a Data
Package that details:

- Proposed Receiving Facility
- Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the above referenced
frequency and following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields
Redevelopment Section Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum
Requirements Checklist (Checklist) and in accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for
Assessment and Cleanup of Contaminated Sites (Guidelines)
- A table comparing the export soil to concentrations on the receiving site concentrations
including risk comparison (Note that calculated risk cannot be increased on the receiving
site)
- A North Carolina PE/PG recommendation of export
- Written approval from the receiving site property owner representative for export
- All relevant attachments listed in the Checklist

17
EMP Version 3, March 2023

Soil Export Options
Impacts
Options
Use as Beneficial Fill
Off-site disposal at
other Brownfields
2,6,7
at LCID/CD
1, 3 D MSW/Permitted
4
All Constituents below
applicable PSRGs X X X X
Constituents5 below
applicable PSRGs; Metals
below background but X X X
Constituents5 below
applicable PSRGs; Metals X X X
Constituents above
Applicable PSRGs X X

1: Requires Prior Written DEQ Approval
2: VOC impacted soils above applicable PSRGs shall not be placed directly beneath building footprints
without prior written DEQ approval.
3: Requires comparison to site specific metals concentrations.
4: Facility to determine if they can accept soil within their permit.
5: Constituents indicate any samples evaluated for other than metals.
6: Requires written approval from receiving site property owner representative.
7. Site COCs must be in comparable concentrations to receiving site and not significantly raise risk of
the receiving site.

☒ Check to confirm that by the owner’s signature and the North Carolina Professional
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect soil
sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the sealing
professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines are followed and reported in
the Soil Export Request for DEQ approval. Failure to meet these requirements could result in
resampling and/or failure to approve export.

If other special considerations apply, discuss:
Click or tap here to enter text.

PART 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES

☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)

☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were
removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth
from which it was excavated.

18
EMP Version 3, March 2023

☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants.
☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials or provide the results of this evaluation in the
Vapor Mitigation Plan. Note that if vapor mitigation is planned for site buildings, utility corridors
will need to be evaluated as part of mitigation designs:

☒ If no, include rationale here:

☐ Unknown, details to be provided in the Vapor Mitigation Plan for site buildings.

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
The contractor and workers will observe soil for potential impacts during utility installation
activities. Evidence of potential significant impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color,
strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e., chemicals, tanks, drums,
etc.). Should the above be noted during utility work, the contractor will contact the project
environmental engineer to observe the suspect condition. If the project environmental engineer
confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures outlined in Managing On-Site
Soil above will be implemented. In addition, the environmental engineer will contact the NCDEQ
Brownfields project manager within two business days to advise that person of the condition.

Should impacted soil be discovered during utility trenching activities, appropriate safety
screening will be performed to protect workers during utility installation activities. Safety
screening activities include monitoring the worker breathing zone with a calibrated
photoionization detector or similar instrument at all times when in utility trenches. If safety
screening results indicate further action is warranted, the work zone will be evacuated until
PART 2. GROUNDWATER
1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
potentiometric groundwater surface was measured at depths ranging from approximately 5 ft

2) What is the maximum depth of soil disturbance onsite?

3) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☐onsite ☒offsite ☐both or ☐unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
Tetrachloroethylene (PCE), trichloroethylene (TCE), cis-1,2-dichloroethylene (DCE), and vinyl

19
EMP Version 3, March 2023
concentrations exceeding 2L Standards. A summary of groundwater analytical data is provided in
Appendix C

4) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?

5) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities (e.g.
footer/utility construction or helical pilings?)
☒Yes ☐No
If yes, describe these activities:
encountered during deep foundation drilling. Groundwater encountered on-site may be
impacted with chlorinated solvents identified during historical assessment activities. As such,
groundwater that is unable to be dissipated into the ground surface will be temporarily staged in
In the event that groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or sampling procedures).
excavation within an area determined to be impacted during construction activities. The
accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent time for dissipation
does not disrupt the construction schedule. Should the time needed for natural dissipation of
accumulated water be deemed inadequate, the water will be temporarily staged in frac tanks
and sampled for VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, and RCRA metals by
EPA Methods 6020/7471. Based on sampling results, temporarily staged water will be disposed
off-site (if impacted) or discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted) in accordance with
applicable municipal and State regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater

6) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☒Yes ☐No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................☒Yes ☐No

7) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
☒ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Redevelopment Section’s intent to allow proper abandonment of
well(s) as specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active
monitoring through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
☐ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
☐ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance

20
EMP Version 3, March 2023
☐ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.

8) Please provide additional details as needed:

Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.

PART 3. SURFACE WATER
1) Is surface water present at the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No
2) If yes, attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities or as part of the final redevelopment? ☐ Yes ☒ No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
Subsequent phases will be routed to the existing municipal storm water system or to planned
retention basins for potential discharge into the municipal storm water system or pumped from
open excavations into the municipal storm water system. Storm water at the site will also be
collected in two storm water retention basins.

If surface water run-off gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted
during construction activities, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken. The
accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent time for dissipation does
not disrupt the construction schedule. Should the time needed for natural dissipation of
accumulated water be deemed inadequate, the water will be temporarily staged in frac tanks
and sampled for VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, and RCRA metals by
EPA Methods 6020/7471. Based on sampling results, temporarily staged water will be disposed
off-site (if impacted) or discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted) in accordance with
applicable municipal and State regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater

PART 4. SEDIMENT
1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No
Click or tap here to enter text.

21
EMP Version 3, March 2023
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No
4) Attach a map showing the location of known contaminated sediment at the property.
5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):

PART 5. SOIL VAPOR
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
Residential ☒☐
☐
☒ Yes ☐ No
☐
☐ Yes ☐ No
☒
Commercial ☐☒
☐
☐☒
☐
☐☐
☒
2) Attach a map showing the locations of all soil vapor samples including any soil vapor
contaminants that exceeds screening levels and overlays planned site development features.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is exterior soil vapor known to be contaminated?

4) If applicable, at what depth(s) is sub-slab soil vapor known to be contaminated?
☐0-6 inches ☒Other, please describe:
As no buildings are currently present on the Brownfields property, no sub-slab vapor samples

5) Will workers encounter contaminated exterior or sub-slab soil vapor during planned
Soil vapor samples were collected at depths ranging from 1 to 10 ft bgs. A summary of soil vapor
laboratory analytical results is provided in Appendix C.

Laboratory analytical results indicate that several VOCs were detected at concentrations above the
laboratory method detection limits in the soil vapor samples collected during historical assessment
activities. Concentrations of PCE, TCE, cis/trans-1,2-DCE, vinyl chloride, and benzene were detected at
concentrations above the NCDEQ DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSLs in historical soil vapor
samples. Recent soil vapor sampling conducted in November 2023 included the collection of four
samples (SG-1 through SG-4). Chloroform was the only contaminant that exceeded Residential SGSLs.
Risk calculator results for soil vapor samples collected in November 2023 indicate acceptable risk

22
EMP Version 3, March 2023
redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
In the event that apparent contaminated soil vapor is encountered (based on elevated PID
readings, unusual odors, etc.) during redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or
other subsurface work,) list activities for management of such contact, INCLUDING notification to
DEQ within 48 hours of identification of the issue for determination of additional requirements:
and construction activities. Should soil vapor be encountered, workers will be removed from the
the extent necessary to return the ambient air to acceptable levels. NCDEQ will be notified in the

PART 6. INDOOR AIR

1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No
2) If applicable, attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site
screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk-based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown ☐ N/A

☐ If no, include rationale here:

4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:

VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM
1) Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

☐ If no or unknown, include rationale here as well as plans for pre-occupancy sampling, as
necessary:

If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☒ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
In the unlikely event there is evidence of potential indoor air issues (i.e., unusual odors) during future
redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the indoor
air will be performed. If warranted, safety screening procedures will include periodically screening
indoor air for volatile organic vapors with a calibrated photoionization detector when workers present
in the Site buildings identify potential indoor air issues. If results indicate further action is warranted,

23
EMP Version 3, March 2023

VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer and follow the DEQ Brownfields Redevelopment Section’s Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System Design Submittal Requirements. Note that approval of this EMP does not imply approval with any vapor intrusion mitigation land
use restrictions or requirements of the recorded or draft Brownfields Agreement and that
separate approval of mitigation measures will be required.

CONTINGENCY PLAN

In this section, please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields project manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields project manager will be notified, and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site-specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
☒ Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260;
Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA List by
EPA Method 6020/7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
During construction activities, contractors may encounter unknown sub-surface environmental
conditions (i.e., tanks, drums, or waste materials) that if encountered, will require proper management.
Prior to beginning site work, Mid-Atlantic will attend a pre-construction kick-off meeting with the PD
and the redevelopment contractors to discuss the NCDEQ approved EMP and various scenarios when it

24
EMP Version 3, March 2023
would be appropriate and necessary to notify Mid-Atlantic of the discovery of unknown subsurface
features or potentially impacted media at the site. In the event that such conditions are encountered
during redevelopment activities, the environmental actions noted below will be used to assist in
appropriate management of sub-surface environmental conditions and determination of the most
suitable final disposition of potentially impacted site media.

Underground Storage Tanks – Note that UST Section guidelines must be followed for sample
frequency during UST closure. Unless damage to onsite structures to remain as part of
redevelopment would occur, USTs shall be removed from the Brownfields Property:
In general, USTs will be addressed in accordance with the most recent version of NCDEQ UST
Guidelines For Site Checks, Tank Closure, And Initial Response And Abatement For UST Releases
requirements. The Brownfield Project Manager and NCDEQ-Mooresville Regional Office will be
notified of the presence of UST(s). If USTs or impacts associated with a UST release are discovered
at the site during redevelopment activities, the UST and/or UST related impacts will be addressed
through the Brownfields Program. NCDEQ Brownfields will be notified within 48-hours of discovery
of the UST.

If an unknown UST is encountered, the UST will be removed, if possible and the UST will be
transported off-site for disposal or recycling at a suitable facility. If the UST contains unknown
residual fluids, the fluids will be sampled for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals, and transported off-
site for disposal at a suitable facility based on the laboratory analytical results prior to removing the
UST from the ground. If a UST is encountered that cannot be removed, it may be abandoned in
place with prior NCDEQ approval and construction will proceed. Where appropriate, the bottom
may be penetrated before abandonment to prevent fluid accumulation. Impacted soil in the vicinity

Sub-Grade Feature/Pit:
If a sub-grade feature or pit is encountered, it will be removed, if possible and will be transported
off-site for disposal or recycling at a suitable facility. If a sub-grade feature or pit is encountered
and cannot be removed, it will be filled with soil or suitable fill and construction will proceed.
Where appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before back filling to prevent fluid
accumulation. If the pit has waste in it, the waste may be set aside in a secure area and will be
sampled for waste disposal purposes for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, and TCLP metals and disposed off-
site at a permitted facility or the waste will be managed in accordance with the Managing On-Site
Soil section outlined above in the EMP, whichever is most applicable based on the type of waste
present. If the pit must be removed and the observed waste characteristics indicate the pit
materials (i.e., concrete or brick) may potentially be contaminated to a significant degree, the pit

Buried Waste Material – Note that if buried waste, non-native fill, or any obviously filled materials
is encountered, the DEQ Brownfields Redevelopment Section must be notified to determine if
investigation of landfill gases is required:
If excavation into buried wastes or significantly impacted soils occurs, the contractor is instructed to

25
EMP Version 3, March 2023
sampling will be conducted at representative locations in the base and the sidewalls of the
excavation after the waste or significantly impacted soil is removed and transported off-site for
disposal in a suitable facility based on results of the sample laboratory analysis. The confirmation
samples will be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals. Areas of suspected contaminated soil
that remain at the site after excavation is complete above the NCDEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs will be

Re-Use of Impacted Soils Onsite:
Please refer to description outlined in the Managing On-Site Soil section of the EMP above.

If unknown, impacted soil is identified onsite, management onsite can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
project manager approval prior to final placement onsite.

If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
Click or tap here to enter text.

POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING

☒ Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the project manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 12/1/2024

The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment-related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required

26
EMP Version 3, March 2023
manifests shall be included).

☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement.
1/2/2024

28
EMP Version 3, March 2023

APPENDIX A

Redevelopment Plans

curbedge
concrete
concrete
approx. location
CommunityFlood fringe
Line
approx. location
FEMAFlood Fringe
Line
approx.
location FEMA
Community
Flood Fringe
approx. location
Community
Encroachment
Line
"Little Sugar
Creek
Greenw
ay"
approx. edge of
creek
DN
DN
DN
DN
RETAIL
RETAIL | RESI
GARAGE ENTRANCE
TRASH AND
RESIDENTIAL
LOADING
RETAIL \RESI
GARAGE ENTRANCE +
EXIT
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK
16' - 0"
11'-0 1/8"
XFMR RM
MAIN ELEC. RM
LOBBY ENT
FCC RM
TRASH
RM
AMENITY SPACE
STAIR B
STAIR A
STAIR B
WATER
STAIR C STAIR C
EL. 639.00
PARK WC
GARAGE
FIRE PUMP RM
UNEXAVATED
30' - 0"11' - 0"
30' - 0"
44° 03' 55"
0'8'16'32'64'
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
1
2
3
4
5
6
BCDEF A
KEYPLAN
ISSUE
GHJ
BCDEF AGHJ
1
2
3
4
5
6
4600 EAST WEST HIGHWAY SUITE 700
Bethesda MD 20814
T 301.654.9300 / F 301.654.7211
[e-mail]
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
MEP ENGINEER
CIVIL ENGINEER
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
OWNER
SEAL
©2012 SK&I Architectural Design Group,
LLC. THIS PROJECT IS PROTECTED BY
COPYRIGHT LAW AND INTERNATIONAL
TREATIES
DRAWING TITLE
DATE
SCALE
OWNER'S PHONE
OWNER CONTACT
MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
5/
2
2
/
2
0
2
3

6
:
3
3
:
2
4

P
M
BI
M

3
6
0
:
/
/
1
2
0
0

M
e
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n
/
A
R
_
N
W
R
0
1
_
R
2
0
.
r
v
t
1/16" = 1'-0"
NWR01
1/16" BUILDING SITE
PLAN
A020
1200 METROPOLITAN
AVE.
LandDesign
223 N GRAHAM STREET,
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
Stewart
223 S. WEST STREET, Suite 1100
Raleigh, NC 27603
Optima Engineering
1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
LandDesign
223 N GRAHAM STREET,
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
1200 Metropolitan Ave. Charlotte,
NC 28204
NORTHWOOD RAVIN
558 E STONEWALL STREET,
SUITE 120 CHARLOTTE NC
28202
704.714.9640
DAVID RAVIN
2023.05.22
Schematic Design Set2021.09.10
2021.11.23 Design Development
50% CD2022.04.19
50% CD
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" A02011/16" SITE PLAN
ZONING: MUDD
*2023.05.22 ARCH PROGRESS SET
6 7321 8
B
C
D
F
G
H
J
E
5
K
4
W
X
20
19
Y
17
AA
Z
BB
22
23
24
25
21 4
S325
_______
1
S325
_______
5" SLAB ON GRADE
SEE 1/S301
26
'
-
1
0
"
16
'
-
5
"
18
'
-
3
"
24
'
-
8
"
17
'
-
0
"
16
'
-
4
"
25
'
-
6
"
14
'
-
0
"
28'-3"
26'-9"
24'-9"
16'-0"
26'-9"
21'-6"
28'-5"
28'-6"
25'-7"
16'-5"
24'-0"28'-7"28'-4"10'-6"28'-6"19'-6"16'-6"
SW
1
0
SW
8
SW
9
SW11
SW
1
2
75 76 77
84
86
96 97
100
99
88
SW16
4" SLAB ON GRADE
SEE 1/S301
639'-0"
FFE
FFE=641'-5 1/4"
SW
4
SW1
SW
3
SW2
SW
6
SW5
SW15
SW18
10" THICK RETAINING
WALL, SEE 16/S312
10" THICK RETAINING
WALL, SEE 16/S312
10" THICK
RETAINING WALL,
SEE 16/S312 10" THICK
RETAINING WALL
10" THICK
RETAINING WALL
10" THICK RETAINING
WALL,
10" THICK RETAINING
WALL, SEE 16/S312
10" THICK RETAINING
WALL, SEE 16/S312
10" THICK RETAINING
WALL, SEE 16/S312
FFE=
642'-0 1/4"
7
S322
_______
4
S322
_______
13
S322
_______
10" THICK RETAINING
WALL, SEE 16/S312
4" SLAB ON
GRADE FFE=637'-9"FFE=637'-9"
4" SLAB ON
GRADE
PROPERTY LINE, TYP
SEE CIVIL
10" THICK RETAINING
WALL, SEE 16/S312
4
S322
_______
1
S301
_______8" CMU WALL ON THICKENED SLAB, TYP
FFE
638'-8"
10" THICK
RETAINING WALL
4" SLAB ON GRADE,
FFE=638'-9"
/S301SEE 1
12
S322
_______
6
103
/S312SEE 16
/S312SEE 16
/S325SEE 4
CONCRETE STAIRS, SEE S312
SPACE CONTROL JOINTS AT
MAXIMUM OF 12'-0" ON-
CENTER EACH DIRECTION
<639'-0">
CONCRETE STAIRS, SEE S312
/S325SEE 4
CONCRETE STAIRS,
SEE S312
CONCRETE STAIRS, SEE S312
FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES:
1. SEE S001 AND S002 FOR GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOL LEGEND.
2. SEE S301 FOR TYPICAL SLAB CONSTRUCTION DETAILS.
3. SEE S411 AND S412 FOR CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULE.
4. TOP OF GRADE BEAM ELEVATION TO BE 642'-9", UNO.
5. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ALL THICKENED SLAB LOCATIONS UNDER CMU PARTITIONS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.
6. DIMENSIONS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF FRAMING, UNO. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL WALL LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS.
7. SLOPE EXTERIOR SLABS, SIDEWALKS, AND PAVING AS INDICATED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.
8. SEE S331 FOR DEEP FOUNDATION DETAILS.
9. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS NOT NOTED HEREIN.
10. P# DESIGNATED PILE#, PC# DESIGNATES PICECAP#, TC# DESIGNATES TRANSITION CAP#, SEE DEEP FOUNDATION DETAISL S331.
223 S. WEST STREET
SUITE 1100
RALEIGH, NC 27603
T 919.380.8750
FIRM LICENSE #C-1051
0'4'8'16'32'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1
2
3
4
5
6
BCDEF A
KEYPLAN
ISSUE
GHJ
BCDEF AGHJ
1
2
3
4
5
6
4600 EAST WEST HIGHWAY SUITE 700
Bethesda MD 20814
T 301.654.9300 / F 301.654.7211
[e-mail]
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
MEP ENGINEER
CIVIL ENGINEER
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
OWNER
SEAL
©2012 SK&I Architectural Design Group,
LLC. THIS PROJECT IS PROTECTED BY
COPYRIGHT LAW AND INTERNATIONAL
TREATIES
DRAWING TITLE
DATE
SCALE
OWNER'S PHONE
OWNER CONTACT
MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
SOUTH
S21100
6/
1
4
/
2
0
2
3

1
:
5
0
:
1
8

P
M
BI
M

3
6
0
:
/
/
1
2
0
0

M
e
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n
/
S
2
1
1
0
0

1
2
0
0

M
e
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n

R
2
0
.
r
v
t
As indicated
NWR01
FOUNDATION PLAN -
MECHANICAL ROOM
S210.2
1200
METROPOLITAN
AVE.
LandDesign
223 N GRAHAM STREET,
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
Stewart
223 S. WEST STREET, Suite 1100
Raleigh, NC 27603
Optima Engineering
1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
LandDesign
223 N GRAHAM STREET,
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
1200 Metropolitan Ave. Charlotte,
NC 28204
NORTHWOOD RAVIN
558 E STONEWALL STREET,
SUITE 120 CHARLOTTE NC
28202
704.714.9640
DAVID RAVIN
2023.02.24
FTG PERMIT
1/8" = 1'-0"S210.2
1 FOUNDATION PLAN - MECHANICAL ROOM
A
1 2021.09.10 Schematic Design Set
2 2021.11.23 Design Development
3 2022.02.15 FTG PERMIT
4 2022.02.28 DD Addendum
5 2022.04.19 50% CD
A 2023.06.15 FTG PMTREV-1 RESP
O
6 7321 8
B
C
D
F
G
H
J
E
5
K
4
A
W
X
20
19
Y
17
AA
Z
BB
22
23
24
25
21 4
S325
_______
1
S325
_______
25
'
-
6
"
26
'
-
1
0
"
16
'
-
5
"
18
'
-
3
"
24
'
-
8
"
17
'
-
0
"
16
'
-
4
"
25
'
-
6
"
14
'
-
0
"
28'-3"
26'-9"
24'-9"
16'-0"
26'-9"
21'-6"
28'-5"
28'-6"
25'-7"
16'-5"
24'-0"28'-7"28'-4"10'-6"28'-6"19'-6"16'-6"
SW
1
0
SW11
SW
1
2
75 76 77
84
86
96 97
100
88
18" THICK MAT FND,
REINFORCED W/ #7@12"OC,
TOP & BOT, EA WAY
<63
7
'
-
2
"
>
SW16
SW
9
SW
8
SW
4
SW1
SW
3
SW2
SW
6
SW5
SEE S215.2 FOR FDN
CONTINUATION
SW15
SW18
7
S322
_______
4
S322
_______
13
S322
_______
SEE S216.2 FOR
FDN CONTINUATION
4'-0"
1'-3"
3'-0"
2'-0"
PROPERTY LINE, TYP
3"
13
S322
_______
SUMP PIT, COORD
W/ PLUMBING
<637'-2">
12
S322
_______
5'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
12
'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
18
'
-
1
0
"
58
'
-
0
"
12'-10"82'-0"
5'-0"12'-0"12'-0"12'-0"12'-0"12'-0"12'-0"5'-0"
5'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
4'-6"
4'-6"
9'-0"
9'-0"
5'-0"
5'-0"
9'-0"
5'-0"
4'
-
6
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
2'
-
6
"
5'-0"3'-0"3'-0"5'-0"
5'-0"5'-4 1/2"5'-4 1/2"5'-0"
9'
-
5

5
/
1
6
"
5'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
9'
-
0
"
5'
-
0
"
10
'
-
1
"
34
'
-
5

1
/
4
"
37'-10 7/8"18'-7"
5'-10 7/8"9'-0"9'-0"3'-0"6'-0"5'-0"
5'
-
0
"
3'
-
0
"
6'
-
0
"
3'
-
0
"
6'
-
0
"
3'
-
0
"
8'
-
5

1
/
4
"
<633'-2">
<634'-6">
<634'-6">
<635'-10">
70
5'-0"
9'-0"
5'-0"
9'-0"
9'-0"
4'-6"
4'-6"
9'-0"
9'-0"
SW
7
19'-0"
55'-0"
5'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
5'-0"
30'-0"
5'-0"12'-0"12'-0"2'-6"
31'-6"
16'-0"
25
'
-
0
"
SW17
99
5'
-
0
"
9'
-
6
"
9'
-
6
"
9'
-
6
"
9'
-
6
"
9'
-
6
"
9'
-
6
"
5'
-
0
"
7'
-
6

1
/
2
"
5'-0"4'-6"4'-6"5'-0"17'-9"
2" EJ
<636'-3">
<634'-11">
<634'-11">
103
6
<636'-3">
PC7
PC1
<642'-3">
<633'-2">
PC3
PC8
<642'-3">
<638'-9">
PC2
<637'-2">
PC5
4'
-
0
"
5'
-
6
"
2'
-
6
"
<637'-2">
PC4
<637'-2">
PC6
5
S325
_______
5
S325
_______
10'-11"
5'-0"
36
45
55
37
3''-4" X 4'-10" PEDESTAL
TYP UNO
38
4''-0" X 4'-0" PEDESTAL
P7, TYP AT PC7
C = 807k
T = 0k
L= 70k
C = 102k
T = 75k
L= 66k
C = 880k
T = 0k
L= 67k
C = 868k
T = 0k
L= 72k
C = 1123k
T = 0k
L= 65k
C = 1535k
T = 0k
L= 82k
C = 1292k
T = 0k
L= 80k
C = 960k
T = 0k
L= 99k
C = 1424k
T = 0k
L= 87k
C = 1597k
T = 0k
L= 74k
C = 943k
T = 0k
L= 109k
C = 1451k
T = 0k
L= 81k
C = 1366k
T = 0k
L= 82k
C = 1103k
T = 0k
L= 82k
C = 1206k
T = 0k
L= 79k
C = 1213k
T = 73k
L= 71k
C = 855k
T = 56k
L= 76k
C = 662k
T = 0k
L= 96k
C = 1004k
T = 0k
L= 82k
C = 992k
T = 0k
L= 82k
C = 1012k
T = 0k
L= 78k
C = 1077k
T = 0k
L= 66k
C = 986k
T = 140k
L= 68k
C = 615k
T = 123k
L= 81k
P10, TYP @ PC2
C = 298k
T = 91k
L= 71k
C = 330k
T = 120k
L= 71k
P7, TYP @ PC8
C = 462k
T = 0k
L= 84k
C = 466k
T = 0k
L= 84k
C = 756k
T = 0k
L= 80k
C = 742k
T = 0k
L= 80k
C = 667k
T = 100k
L= 81k
C = 645k
T = 0k
L= 89k
P7, TYP @ PC 1
P7, TYP @ PC3
P7, TYP @ PC4
P2 P2
P2
P2
P2 P2
P2
P2
P2 P2
P2
P2
P1
P2
P1
P1
P4P8P4
P7, TYP @ PC5
P3, TYP @ PC6
<63
7
'
-
2
"
>
<63
5
'
-
1
0
"
>
<633'-2">
10" THICK RETAINING WALL
SEE 16/S312
10" THICK RETAINING WALL
SEE 16/S312
4'-5"
1'-5 9/16"
12
'
-
6
"
6'-8 3/4"
6'
-
0
"
6'
-
7

1
/
4
"
6"
3'
-
1

1
/
1
6
"
36'-6"
15'-2"
ALIGN PILE-CAP WITH
EDGE WITH PROPERTY
LINE
2" EJ
63
74
FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES:
1. SEE S001 AND S002 FOR GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOL LEGEND.
2. SEE S301 FOR TYPICAL SLAB CONSTRUCTION DETAILS.
3. SEE S411 AND S412 FOR CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULE.
4. TOP OF GRADE BEAM ELEVATION TO BE 642'-9", UNO.
5. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ALL THICKENED SLAB LOCATIONS UNDER CMU PARTITIONS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.
6. DIMENSIONS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF FRAMING, UNO. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL WALL LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS.
7. SLOPE EXTERIOR SLABS, SIDEWALKS, AND PAVING AS INDICATED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.
8. SEE S331 FOR DEEP FOUNDATION DETAILS.
9. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS NOT NOTED HEREIN.
10. P# DESIGNATED PILE#, PC# DESIGNATES PICECAP#, TC# DESIGNATES TRANSITION CAP#, SEE DEEP FOUNDATION DETAISL S331.
223 S. WEST STREET
SUITE 1100
RALEIGH, NC 27603
T 919.380.8750
FIRM LICENSE #C-1051
0'4'8'16'32'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1
2
3
4
5
6
BCDEF A
KEYPLAN
ISSUE
GHJ
BCDEF AGHJ
1
2
3
4
5
6
4600 EAST WEST HIGHWAY SUITE 700
Bethesda MD 20814
T 301.654.9300 / F 301.654.7211
[e-mail]
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
MEP ENGINEER
CIVIL ENGINEER
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
OWNER
SEAL
©2012 SK&I Architectural Design Group,
LLC. THIS PROJECT IS PROTECTED BY
COPYRIGHT LAW AND INTERNATIONAL
TREATIES
DRAWING TITLE
DATE
SCALE
OWNER'S PHONE
OWNER CONTACT
MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
SOUTH
S21100
6/
1
4
/
2
0
2
3

1
:
5
0
:
1
8

P
M
BI
M

3
6
0
:
/
/
1
2
0
0

M
e
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n
/
S
2
1
1
0
0

1
2
0
0

M
e
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n

R
2
0
.
r
v
t
As indicated
NWR01
DEEP FOUNDATION
PLAN - MECHANICAL
ROOM
S210
1200
METROPOLITAN
AVE.
LandDesign
223 N GRAHAM STREET,
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
Stewart
223 S. WEST STREET, Suite 1100
Raleigh, NC 27603
Optima Engineering
1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
LandDesign
223 N GRAHAM STREET,
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
1200 Metropolitan Ave. Charlotte,
NC 28204
NORTHWOOD RAVIN
558 E STONEWALL STREET,
SUITE 120 CHARLOTTE NC
28202
704.714.9640
DAVID RAVIN
2023.02.24
FTG PERMIT
1/8" = 1'-0"S210
1 DEEP FOUNDATION PLAN - MECHANICAL ROOM
A
1 2021.09.10 Schematic Design Set
2 2021.11.23 Design Development
3 2022.02.15 FTG PERMIT
4 2022.02.28 DD Addendum
5 2022.04.19 50% CD
A 2023.06.15 FTG PMTREV-1 RESP
121110
15
16
18
S
T
P
6 7321 8
B
C
D
F
G
H
J
E
5
K
4
Q
R
W
X
V
20
19
Y
17
U
14
27'-6"
26'-8"
22'-5"
26
'
-
1
0
"
16
'
-
5
"
18
'
-
3
"
24
'
-
8
"
17
'
-
0
"
16
'
-
4
"
25
'
-
6
"
14
'
-
0
"
27'-6"
26'-8"
22'-5"
19'-5"
10'-3"
26
'
-
1
0
"
16
'
-
5
"
18
'
-
3
"
24
'
-
8
"
17
'
-
0
"
16
'
-
4
"
25
'
-
6
"
14
'
-
0
"
25'-0"
19'-0"
13'-4"
28'-3"
26'-9"
27'-6"
26'-8"
22'-5"
25'-0"15'-0"
19'-5"
10'-3"
24'-9"
16'-0"
/S216.2SEE 1/S216.2SEE 1
4" SLAB ON GRADE
SEE 1/S301
SW1
SW
3
SW2
SW
4
SW
6
SW5
5" SLAB ON GRADE
SEE 1/S301
SW
7
4" SLAB ON GRADE
SEE 1/S301
5" SLAB ON GRADE
SEE 1/S301, TYP UNO
SW
9
AA
Z
BB
22
23
24
25
21 26'-9"
21'-6"
28'-5"
28'-6"
25'-7"
16'-5"
24'-0"28'-7"28'-4"10'-6"28'-6"19'-6"16'-6"
34 35
5352
70
82
91
84
85
96
83
97
9998
92
94
33
88
81
93
42 43
86
79
30
55
72
31
51
45
64
69
58
68
59
100
54
44
60
95
171615
4
S325
_______
1
S325
_______
2'-5"
20'-9 1/2"
4'
-
3
"
4'
-
5
"
10
'
-
8
"
5"
5'-1"
2
7
/
8
"
14
'
-
1

1
1
/
1
6
"
7'-6 7/8"
13'-1 5/8"
6'
-
9

7
/
8
"
21
'
-
2

7
/
1
6
"
2'-5 15/16"
3'-0 13/16"
5'
-
1
1

3
/
4
"
8'
-
4

1
3
/
1
6
"
5/
1
6
"
9'-4 1/4"
8'-8 1/16"
14'-10 15/16"
8'
-
9

1
1
/
1
6
"
5'-4 15/16"
_____
S250
1
SW
1
0
27A
56
77
SW11
SW
1
2
SW
8
75
62
76
37
10'-8"
1'
-
4
"
73
11'-7 3/4"
41
32
22
102
25
SW15
48
9'-0"
5" SLAB ON GRADE
SEE 1/S301
RA
M
P
UP
FFE=644'-6"RAMP
UP
5" SLAB ON GRADE
SEE 1/S301
FFE=644'-3"
FFE=644'-3"
RAMPUP
FFE=644'-6"
5" SLAB ON GRADE
SEE 1/S301
10'-3"6'-0"
9"
6"
3'
-
0
"
SEE 1/S250 FOR RAMP
UP TO LEVEL 2
SW16
<639'-9">
89
101
SEE S210 FOR FDN
CONTINUATION
14
S325
_______
12
S325
_______
7
S322
_______
SW17
SW18
5
S325
_______
13
S325
_______
66
57
8" CMU ON
THICKENED SLAB
1'-3"
47
15
S325
_______
4
S322
_______
13
S322
_______
1'-0"
11'-8"
10'-5"
1'-4"
1'-4"3 15/16"
1'
-
8

3
/
4
"
1'-4"
4'-1 1/4"
2'-1"7 1/4"
5"
1'-2 1/4"
8'-1 3/4"
1'
-
4

3
/
8
"
1'
-
3

1
/
2
"
6"
1'
-
3

1
/
2
"
6"
1'
-
3

1
/
2
"
5"5"
1'
-
3

1
/
2
"
1'-2"1'
-
4

1
/
2
"
1'
-
6
"
1'-2"
6"
11
"
11
"
11
"
1'
-
1
1
"
2'
-
6
"
4'-0 1/8"
1'-0 1/2"
5"
2'-0 11/16"
1'-0 1/4"
9"
6'-0"
8"
2"3'-1
"
1"
1'-7
"
36
8" CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE
WALL, SEE 5/S322
8" CMU ON
THICKENED SLAB
4" SLAB
ON GRADE
5" SLAB
ON GRADE
2
S322
_______
8" CMU ABOVE
RETAINING WALL
8" CMU ABOVE
RETAINING WALL
8" CMU ABOVE
RETAINING WALL
GREASE
RECEPTOR PIT
SUMP PIT, SEE 9/S311
5
S312
_______
8" THICK CAST-IN-PLACE
CONCRETE WALL
8" CMU ON
THICKENED SLAB
FFE=644'-0 1/2"
2
S322
_______
8" CAST-IN-PLACE
CONCRETE WALL
6"
6"
10
"
11
S325
_______
PROPERTY LINE, TYP
SEE CIVIL
1
S301
_______TYP
8" CAST IN PLACE
CONCRETE WALL, SEE
5/S322
LEAVE OUT FOR
TOWER CRANE,
COORD W/
CONTRACTOR
1
S301
_______
SIM
1
S301
_______TYP
9
S322
_______
8" CMU ON
THICKENED SLAB
8" CMU ON
THICKENED SLAB
8" CMU ON
THICKENED SLAB
40 FFE=644'-3"
<639'-9
"
>
FFE=642'-5"
<642'-0">SEE S215 FOR FDN
CONTINUATION
23
6B
8" CMU WALL ON
THICKENED SLAB
8" CMU WALL ON
THICKENED SLAB
8" CMU WALL ON
THICKENED SLAB
8" CMU ON
THICKENED SLAB
29
28
12
S322
_______
38
39
24
50
6 103
1
S301
_______TYP
5"
15'-0 7/8"
3'
-
3
"
2"2"
15'-7"
61
5'-1"
2'
-
1
1
"
10'-8"
2'-6"
2'
-
1
0
"
2'-0 1/2"
1"
8'
-
7
"
1"
5'-0"
5'-0"
2'
-
1
0
"
17'-0"
17'-0"
1'
-
1
0
"
8'
-
7
"
15'-0"
15'-0"
8'-3 3/8"
10'-10 1/2"
11'-2"
6'-6 3/4"
4'-1"
9'
-
4

1
/
2
"
1"
1"
1'-2 1/8"
1'-4"
3 15/16"
1'-4"
2'-10"
1'
-
0
"
11'-8"
3"3"
1'-0"
1'-6"
1'-6"
23'-9"
3'
-
5

1
/
2
"
1'-8 1/4"
7'
-
1
1

3
/
8
"
90
63
74
PLACE CONTROL JOINTS AT
MAXIMUM OF 15'-0" OC AT 5" SLAB-
ON-GRADE
PLACE CONTROL
JOINTS AT MAXIMUM
OF 12'-0" OC AT 4"
SLAB-ON-GRADE
SEE 14/S312 FOR SIM
WALL DETAILING AT
SLAB-ON-GRADE
1
S301
_______TYP
PLACE CONTROL JOINTS AT
MAXIMUM OF 12'-0" OC AT
4" SLAB-ON-GRADE
PLACE CONTROL
JOINTS AT MAXIMUM
OF 15'-0" OC AT 5"
SLAB-ON-GRADE
SEE 14/S312 FOR SIM
WALL DETAILING AT SLAB-
ON-GRADE
FOUNDATION PLAN NOTES:
1. SEE S001 AND S002 FOR GENERAL NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS, AND SYMBOL LEGEND.
2. SEE S301 FOR TYPICAL SLAB CONSTRUCTION DETAILS.
3. SEE S411 AND S412 FOR CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULE.
4. TOP OF GRADE BEAM ELEVATION TO BE 642'-9", UNO.
5. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ALL THICKENED SLAB LOCATIONS UNDER CMU PARTITIONS WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.
6. DIMENSIONS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF FRAMING, UNO. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL WALL LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS.
7. SLOPE EXTERIOR SLABS, SIDEWALKS, AND PAVING AS INDICATED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.
8. SEE S331 FOR DEEP FOUNDATION DETAILS.
9. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS NOT NOTED HEREIN.
10. P# DESIGNATED PILE#, PC# DESIGNATES PICECAP#, TC# DESIGNATES TRANSITION CAP#, SEE DEEP FOUNDATION DETAISL S331.
223 S. WEST STREET
SUITE 1100
RALEIGH, NC 27603
T 919.380.8750
FIRM LICENSE #C-1051
0'4'8'16'32'
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
1
2
3
4
5
6
BCDEF A
KEYPLAN
ISSUE
GHJ
BCDEF AGHJ
1
2
3
4
5
6
4600 EAST WEST HIGHWAY SUITE 700
Bethesda MD 20814
T 301.654.9300 / F 301.654.7211
[e-mail]
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
MEP ENGINEER
CIVIL ENGINEER
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
OWNER
SEAL
©2012 SK&I Architectural Design Group,
LLC. THIS PROJECT IS PROTECTED BY
COPYRIGHT LAW AND INTERNATIONAL
TREATIES
DRAWING TITLE
DATE
SCALE
OWNER'S PHONE
OWNER CONTACT
MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
SOUTH
S21100
6/
1
4
/
2
0
2
3

1
:
5
0
:
2
1

P
M
BI
M

3
6
0
:
/
/
1
2
0
0

M
e
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n
/
S
2
1
1
0
0

1
2
0
0

M
e
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n

R
2
0
.
r
v
t
As indicated
NWR01
1ST FLOOR
FOUNDATION PLAN -
PART A
S215.2
1200
METROPOLITAN
AVE.
LandDesign
223 N GRAHAM STREET,
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
Stewart
223 S. WEST STREET, Suite 1100
Raleigh, NC 27603
Optima Engineering
1927 S. TRYON STREET, SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
LandDesign
223 N GRAHAM STREET,
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
1200 Metropolitan Ave. Charlotte,
NC 28204
NORTHWOOD RAVIN
558 E STONEWALL STREET,
SUITE 120 CHARLOTTE NC
28202
704.714.9640
DAVID RAVIN
2023.02.24
FTG PERMIT
1/8" = 1'-0"S215.2
1 1ST FLOOR FOUNDATION PLAN - PART A
A
1 2021.09.10 Schematic Design Set
2 2021.11.23 Design Development
3 2022.02.15 FTG PERMIT
4 2022.02.28 DD Addendum
5 2022.04.19 50% CD
A 2023.06.15 FTG PMTREV-1 RESP
ID Task Name % Work Complete Duration Start Finish Predecessors Notes
1 1200 METRO - Early Works - Project Schedule 0%
2 DESIGN - PRECONSTRUCTION 0%540 days Mon 1/24/22 Fri 2/16/24
3 Plan Development 0%620 days Tue 2/15/22 Mon 7/1/24
13 Land Development - Civil 0%561 days Fri 1/28/22 Fri 3/22/24
21 City - Utility - Misc 0%120 days Mon 9/25/23 Fri 3/8/24
22 Duke Power - Primary Design 50%60 days Mon 12/18/23 Fri 3/8/2418
23 LD - Greenway - Easements 75%75 days Mon 9/25/23 Fri 1/5/2417
24 CDOT Signal 0%170 days Mon 7/3/23 Fri 2/23/24
25 Traffic Signal Pole Relocation Design/Approval 75%140 days Mon 7/3/23 Fri 1/12/2417SS
26 Mast Arm - Temp 0%30 days Mon 1/15/24 Fri 2/23/2425
27 CONSTRUCTION 0%166 days Mon 11/27/23 Mon 7/15/24
28 Notice to Proceed (Early Works - Site & Foundations)0%0 days Mon 11/27/23 Mon 11/27/23
29 SITEWORKS 0%156 days Mon 12/11/23 Mon 7/15/24
30 Siteworks Phase 1 0%65 days Mon 12/11/23 Fri 3/8/24
31 LD Precon - Grading Permit 0%1 day Mon 12/11/23 Mon 12/11/2328FS+10 days
32 Erosion Control - Phase 1 0%20 days Mon 12/11/23 Fri 1/5/2431SS
33 Site Demolition & Grading - Phase 1 0%10 days Mon 1/8/24 Fri 1/19/2432
34 Storm & Sewer - Phase 1 0%35 days Mon 1/22/24 Fri 3/8/2433
35 Storm Detention 0%20 days Mon 3/11/24 Mon 4/8/2434
36 Continued Grading - Export 0%60 days Mon 4/22/24 Mon 7/15/2443SS+10 days
37 Primary Distributions 0%90 days Mon 3/11/24 Fri 7/12/24
38 Primary from Kings - Conduit & Pole 0%20 days Mon 3/11/24 Fri 4/5/2434
39 Temp Transformer 0%10 days Mon 4/8/24 Fri 4/19/2438
40 Conduit Distribution for Pads/Site/Utility 0%60 days Mon 4/22/24 Fri 7/12/2439
41 VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION 0%60 days Mon 4/8/24 Mon 7/1/24
42 STRUCTURE 0%60 days Mon 4/8/24 Mon 7/1/24
43 Deep Foundations 0%60 days Mon 4/8/24 Mon 7/1/2435,20
44 Substantial Completion (Early Works)0%0 days Mon 7/1/24 Mon 7/1/2443
DESIGN - PRECONSTRUCTION
Duke Power - Primary Design
LD - Greenway - Easements
Mast Arm - Temp
11/27
LD Precon - Grading Permit
Erosion Control - Phase 1
Site Demolition & Grading - Phase 1
Storm & Sewer - Phase 1
Storm Detention
Continued Grading - Export
Primary from Kings - Conduit & Pole
Temp Transformer
Conduit Distribution for Pads/Site/Utility
Deep Foundations
7/1
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
4th Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter2024
EXHIBIT B - PROJECT SCHEDULE
1200 METRO - EARLY WORKS
CHARLOTTE, NC
Page 1 Print Date: Fri 11/17/23

APPENDIX B

Grading Plan

Job: 1020219-X-EWRK
Units: Ft-CY
Tue Oct 17, 2023 15:41:46 Page 1
Volume Report
Subgrade vs Stripped
Area Volume Comp/Ratio Compact Export Change
Total Cut Fill OnGrade Cut Fill Cut Fill Cut Fill -Import Per 0.1 ft
BMP 2,368 2,368 0 0 807 0 1.00 1.15 807 0 807 10
Unspecified 44,148 12,909 29,072 2,168 303 1,624 1.00 1.15 303 1,868 -1,565 188
Job Total 46,516 15,277 29,072 2,168 1,110 1,624 1,110 1,868 -758 198
Plane Slope
Stripping Qtys Area Area Depth Volume
STRIPPING 46,516 46,665 0.500 864
Plane Slope
Sectional Qtys Area Area Depth Volume
BMP 2,368 2,379 10.000 881
SITE 44,148 44,137 0.670 1,095
Sectional Total 46,516 46,516 1,976
´Traffic Circle

APPENDIX C

Historical Analytical Tables and Figures

DRAWN BY: DATE:
ENG. CHECK:
JOB NO:DRAFTCHECK: GIS NO:
SUBJECT PROPERTY
´
1:24,000SCALE:
North Carolina
South Carolina
§¨¦I- 485
§¨¦I- 77 §¨¦I- 85
Newton
Monroe
Concord
Matthews
Gastonia
Rock Hill
Salisbury
Mint Hill
Cornelius
Charlotte
Kannapolis
Mooresville
Indian Trail
Huntersville
York Union
Rowan
Gaston
Mecklenburg
Lincoln
Cabarrus
Stanly
Catawba
Chester
Iredell
Lancaster Chesterfield
0 2,000 4,0001,000 Feet
REFERENCES:1. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE: CHARLOTTE EAST, NC - 20192. INSET MAP DATA DOWNLOADED FROM DATA.GOV
FIGURE 1 - SITE LOCATION MAPMETROPOLITAN RESIDENTIAL PAD1224 METROPOLITAN AVENUECHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA APPROVAL:
NOVEMBER 2020
05G-H1515.00-01FIG NO: 1
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 10 FEET
GDI
000H1515.00
#*
#*
#*
#*
S King
s

D
r
Ke
n
i
l
w
o
r
t
h

A
v
Baxte
r

S
t
Metro
p
o
l
i
t
a
n

A
v
´
DRAWN BY:
LEGEND
#*Soil-Gas SampleLocations07014035Feet
1:600SCALE =
GDI
DHN
SG-1SG-2
SG-3
SG-4
TABLE 1
Soil Vapor Analytical Summary
Midtown Square Mall
1200 Metropolitan Avenue, Charlotte, North Carolina
NCDEQ Brownfields Project #09058-05-060Mid-Atlantic Project #H1824.00
Sample ID SG-2 SG-3 SG-4
Sample Depth (ft bgs)6.0 6.0 6.0
Sample Date 11/2/2023 11/2/2023 11/2/2023
Sample Location
VOCs (EPA Method TO-15)
Acetone NE NE --72 73 150 73 71
Benzene 12 160 --7.6 7.6 4.2 8.9 5.6
Bromodichloromethane 2.5 33 --<0.36 1.2 <0.36 <0.36 <0.36
2-Butanone 35,000 440,000 --<6.6 <6.6 12 7.3 <6.6
Carbon Disulfide 4,900 61,000 --35 36 10 17 24
Carbon Tetrachloride 16 200 --0.75 0.81 0.38 0.45 0.78
Chloroform 4.1 53 --19 19 13 5.1 4.9
Chloromethane 630 7,900 --<0.17 0.35 <0.17 <0.17 0.59
Cyclohexane 42,000 530,000 --28 28 7.3 16 22
Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)700 8,800 --1.3 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.3
Ethanol NE NE --35 36 57 46 52
Ethyl Acetate 490 6,100 --2.2 <2.1 3.3 <2.1 <2.1
Ethylbenzene 3.7 490 --4.5 4.5 3.0 2.5 2.3
4-Ethyltoluene NE NE --0.9 1.0 0.94 0.73 0.67
Heptane 2,800 35,000 --6.6 6.4 3.1 5.0 4.9
Hexane 4,900 61,000 --15 15 <9.3 21 15
Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)360 4,700 --1.0 1.1 <0.35 <0.35 0.53
Methylene chloride 3,400 53,000 --2.3 2.4 2.6 2.0 2.3
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)21,000 260,000 --3.6 3.7 4.2 2.9 3.3
Propene 21,000 260,000 --39 40 <3.7 77 23
Styrene 7,000 88,000 --0.66 0.65 0.63 0.5 0.61
Tetrachloroethylene 280 3,500 --110 120 0.79 1.1 <0.51
Tetrahydrofuran 14,000 180,000 --6.5 6.9 7.5 1.8 <1.2
Toluene 35,000 440,000 --54 53 34 27 25
Trichloroethylene 14 180 --0.9 1.1 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)NE NE --2.3 2.4 6.0 4.4 1.4
35,000 440,000 --0.8 1.2 0.43 0.74 0.46
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 420 5,300 --4.1 4.4 4.4 3.7 3.8
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 420 5,300 --0.77 0.81 0.65 0.59 0.67
m&p-Xylene 700 8,800 --13 13 10 8.2 8.2
o-Xylene 700 8,800 --4.4 4.4 3.6 3.0 3.0
Residential Risk Calculator
LICR ----< 1.00E-04
Non-Carcinogenic HI ----< 1
Non-Residential Risk Calculator
LICR ----< 1.00E-04
Non-Carcinogenic HI ----< 1
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) (July 2023).
2) NCDEQ DWM Risk Calculator (July 2023).
3) Risk Calculator results were calculated using the highest concentrations of each constituent detected in soil vapor samples across entire site.
Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown
Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parantheses
values indicate the VOC was below the laboratory method reporting limit
Bold values indicates the an exceedance of the Residential SGSL or the cumulative LICR/HI exceeds the risk level
VOCs = volatile organic compounds
LICR = Lifetime Incremental Carcinogenic Risk; HI = Hazard Index
NE = Not Established; -- = Not Applicable
ft bgs = feet below ground surface
values indicate the concentration was below the laboratory method detection limit
Residential
SGSLs (1)
DEQ Acceptable Cumulative Risk
Levels (3)Non-Residential
Proposed Residential High Rise
11/2/2023
6.0
SG-1 / DUP-1
Page 1 of 1
Version Date:
Basis:
Site Name:
Site Address:
DEQ Section:
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID:
Submittal Date:
Reviewed By:
11/21/2023
Prepared By:Shane Sisco, P.G.
Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc.
Greg Icenhour, P.G.
Soil Vapor (Highest Concentrations)
Midtown Square Mall
1200 Metropolitan Avenue, Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields
09058-05-060
July 2023
May 2023 EPA RSL Table
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Table of Contents
Version Date: July 2023
Basis: May 2023 EPA RSL Table
Site ID: 09058-05-060
Exposure Unit ID: Soil Vapor (Highest Concentrations)
Form No.
Input Form 1A Complete Exposure Pathways
Input Form 1B Exposure Factors and Target Risks
Input Form 1C Contaminant Migration Parameters
Input Form 1D Sample Statistics
Input Form 2A
Input Form 2B Groundwater Exposure Point Concentration Table
Input Form 2C Surface Water Exposure Point Concentration Table
Input Form 2D Soil Gas Exposure Point Concentration Table
Input Form 2E Indoor Air Exposure Point Concentration Table
Output Form 1A Risk for Individual Pathways
Output Form 1B Sitewide Risk
Output Form 2A Resident Soil
Output Form 2B Resident Groundwater Use
Output Form 2C Non-Residential Worker Soil
Output Form 2D Non-Residential Worker Groundwater Use
Output Form 2E Construction Worker Soil
Output Form 2F Recreator/Trespasser Soil
Output Form 2G Recreator/Trespasser Surface Water
Output Form 3A Resident Groundwater to Indoor Air
Output Form 3B Resident Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Output Form 3C Resident Indoor Air
Output Form 3D Non-Residential Worker Groundwater to Indoor Air
Output Form 3E Non-Residential Worker Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Output Form 3F Non-Residential Worker Indoor Air
Output Form 4A Soil to Groundwater - Forward Mode
Output Form 4B Groundwater to Groundwater - Forward Mode
Output Form 4C Soil to Surface Water - Forward Mode
Output Form 4D Groundwater to Surface Water - Forward Mode
Output Form 4E Soil to Groundwater - Backward Mode
Output Form 4F Groundwater to Groundwater - Backward Mode
Output Form 4G
Output Section 4 - Contaminant Migration Worksheets
Output Section 3 - Vapor Intrusion Calculators
TOC
Description
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Complete Exposure Pathways
Version Date: July 2023
Basis: May 2023 EPA RSL Table
Site ID: 09058-05-060
Exposure Unit ID: Soil Vapor (Highest Concentrations)
Note: Risk output will only be calculated for complete exposure pathways.
Receptor Pathway
Check box if
pathway
complete
Soil
Groundwater Use
Soil
Groundwater Use
Construction Worker Soil
Soil
Surface Water
Groundwater to Indoor Air
Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Indoor Air
Groundwater to Indoor Air
Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Indoor Air
Source Soil
Source Groundwater
Source Soil
Source Groundwater
Input Form 1A
VAPOR INTRUSION PATHWAYS
DIRECT CONTACT SOIL AND WATER PATHWAYS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
Recreator/Trespasser
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
CONTAMINANT MIGRATION PATHWAYS
Groundwater
Surface Water
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Exposure Point ConcentrationsVersion Date: July 2023
Basis: May 2023 EPA RSL TableSite ID: 09058-05-060
Exposure Unit ID: Soil Vapor (Highest Concentrations)
Description of Exposure Point Concentration Selection:
Exposure Point Concentration
(ug/m3)Notes:CAS Number Chemical Minimum Concentration (Qualifier)
Maximum Concentration (Qualifier)
Units Location of Maximum Concentration
Detection Frequency
Range of Detection Limits
Concentration Used for Screening
Background Value
Screening Toxicity Value (Screening Level) (n/c)
Potential ARAR/TBC Value
Potential ARAR/TBC Source
COPC Flag (Y/N)
Rationale for Selection or Deletion
150 67-64-1 Acetone
8.9 71-43-2 Benzene
1.2 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane3575-15-0 Carbon Disulfide
0.81 56-23-5 Carbon Tetrachloride
19 67-66-3 Chloroform
0.59 74-87-3 Chloromethane
28 110-83-8 Cyclohexene
1.3 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane
3.3 141-78-6 Ethyl Acetate
4.5 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene6.6 142-82-5 Heptane, N-
21 110-54-3 Hexane, N-
12 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)
4.2 108-10-1 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone)
1.1 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
2.6 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride
77 115-07-1 Propylene
0.66 100-42-5 Styrene120127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene
54 108-88-3 Toluene
1.2 76-13-1 Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane, 1,1,2-
1.1 79-01-6 Trichloroethylene
6 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane
4.4 95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-
0.81 108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-
17.4 1330-20-7 Xylenes
Input Form 2D
Soil Gas Exposure Point Concentration Table
Note: Chemicals highlighted in orange are non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion risk, no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.If the chemical list is changed from a prior calculator run, remember to select "See All Chemicals" on the data output sheet or newly added chemicals will not be included in risk calculations
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Risk for Individual Pathways Output Form 1A
Version Date: July 2023
Basis: May 2023 EPA RSL Table
Site ID: 09058-05-060
Exposure Unit ID: Soil Vapor (Highest Concentrations)
Receptor Pathway Hazard Index Risk exceeded?
Soil NC NC NC
Groundwater Use*NC NC NC
Soil NC NC NC
Groundwater Use*NC NC NC
Construction Worker Soil NC NC NC
Soil NC NC NC
Surface Water*NC NC NC
Receptor Pathway Hazard Index Risk exceeded?
Groundwater to Indoor Air NC NC NC
Soil Gas to Indoor Air 6.5E-06 1.3E-01 NO
Indoor Air NC NC NC
Groundwater to Indoor Air NC NC NC
Soil Gas to Indoor Air 4.9E-07 1.0E-02 NO
Indoor Air NC NC NC
Pathway Source
Source Soil NC
Source Groundwater NC
Source Soil NC
Source Groundwater NC
DIRECT CONTACT SOIL AND WATER CALCULATORS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
Recreator/Trespasser
NC 2B Standards, appropriate remediation and/or institutional control measures will be necessary to be eligible for a risk-based
Surface Water
VAPOR INTRUSION CALCULATORS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
CONTAMINANT MIGRATION CALCULATORS
Target Receptor Concentrations Exceeded?
Groundwater
1. If lead concentrations were entered in the exposure point concentration tables, see the individual calculator sheets for lead
concentrations in comparison to screening levels. Note that lead is not included in cumulative risk calculations.
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Sout
h

K
i
n
g
s

D
r
i
v
e
Ke
n
i
l
w
o
r
t
h

A
v
e
n
u
e
Charlottet
o
w
n

A
v
e
n
u
e
SV-4
SV-3
SV-2
SV-5
SV-1
SV-6
SV-7
369
24,000
120,100
2,980
336,000
2,000
100,000
mg/m³
10,000 mg/m³
1,000 mg/m³
Property Line
Existing Building
Historic Building
Soil Vapor Monitor Point Location
Total Concentration of ChlorinatedSolvents in Soil Gas (mg/m³)120,100
Explanation
2
-

S
o
i
l

G
a
s

C
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

M
a
p
Me
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n

M
i
d
t
o
w
n

-

1
1
1
1

M
e
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n

A
v
e
n
u
e
J.
P
.

M
o
r
g
a
n

A
s
s
e
t

M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
27
0

P
a
r
k

A
v
e
n
u
e
,

7
t
h

F
l
o
o
r
Ne
w

Y
o
r
k
,

N
e
w

Y
o
r
k

1
0
0
1
7
75
0
5
6
.
0
0
0
7
_
S
M
AF

N
W

A
S

S
H
O
W
N

1
0
/
2
2
/
1
2

0
9
0
.
7
5
0
5
6
.
0
0
0
7
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
O
.
NO
T
E
S
:
DA
T
E
TIT
L
E
SC
A
L
E
RE
V
.

B
Y
PR
E
P
.

B
Y
CA
D

F
I
L
E
SIT
E

I
D
Sout
h

K
i
n
g
s

D
r
i
v
e
Ke
n
i
l
w
o
r
t
h

A
v
e
n
u
e
Charlottet
o
w
n

A
v
e
n
u
e
GP-22/MW-7
GP-19/MW-5
GP-10/MW-2
GP-1/MW-1
GP-13/MW-3
GP-21/MW-6
GP-12/MW-4
SB-6
SB-7
SB-1
SB-2
SB-3
SB-4
SB-5
GP-4
GP-24
DW-1
1.2
1.1
610
393.7
517.2
5.6
8.1
6.4
3.8
19
135
100 —J/
10 —J/
1 —J/
Property Line
Existing Building
Historic Building
Groundwater Monitor Well Location
Soil Boring Location
Explanation
Total Concentration of ChlorinatedSolvents in Groundwater (µg/L)120
Me
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n

M
i
d
t
o
w
n

-

1
1
1
1

M
e
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n

A
v
e
n
u
e
J.
P
.

M
o
r
g
a
n

A
s
s
e
t

M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
27
0

P
a
r
k

A
v
e
n
u
e
,

7
t
h

F
l
o
o
r
Ne
w

Y
o
r
k
,

N
e
w

Y
o
r
k

1
0
0
1
7
75
0
5
6
.
0
0
0
7
_
S
M
AF

N
W

A
S

S
H
O
W
N

1
0
/
2
2
/
1
2

0
9
0
.
7
5
0
5
6
.
0
0
0
7
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
O
.
NO
T
E
S
:
DA
T
E
TIT
L
E
SC
A
L
E
RE
V
.

B
Y
PR
E
P
.

B
Y
CA
D

F
I
L
E
SIT
E

I
D
Sout
h

K
i
n
g
s

D
r
i
v
e
Ke
n
i
l
w
o
r
t
h

A
v
e
n
u
e
Charlottet
o
w
n

A
v
e
n
u
e
SV-4
SV-3
SV-2
SV-5
SV-1
SV-6
SV-7
369
24,000
120,100
2,980
336,000
2,000
100,000
mg/m³
10,000 mg/m³
1,000 mg/m³
GP-22/MW-7
GP-19/MW-5
GP-10/MW-2
GP-1/MW-1
GP-13/MW-3
GP-21/MW-6
GP-12/MW-4
SB-6
SB-7
SB-1
SB-2
SB-3
SB-4
SB-5
GP-4
GP-24
DW-1
1.2
1.1
610
393.7
517.2
5.6
8.1
6.4
3.8
19
135
100 —J/
10 —J/
1 —J/
Property Line
Existing Building
Historic Building
Soil Vapor Monitor Point Location
Total Concentration of ChlorinatedSolvents in Soil Gas (mg/m³)120,100
Groundwater Monitor Well Location
Soil Boring Location
Explanation
Total Concentration of Chlorinated
Solvents in Groundwater (µg/L)120
Me
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n

M
i
d
t
o
w
n

-

1
1
1
1

M
e
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n

A
v
e
n
u
e
J.
P
.

M
o
r
g
a
n

A
s
s
e
t

M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
27
0

P
a
r
k

A
v
e
n
u
e
,

7
t
h

F
l
o
o
r
Ne
w

Y
o
r
k
,

N
e
w

Y
o
r
k

1
0
0
1
7
75
0
5
6
.
0
0
0
7
_
S
M
AF

N
W

A
S

S
H
O
W
N

1
0
/
2
2
/
1
2

0
9
0
.
7
5
0
5
6
.
0
0
0
7
PR
O
J
E
C
T

N
O
.
NO
T
E
S
:
DA
T
E
TIT
L
E
SC
A
L
E
RE
V
.

B
Y
PR
E
P
.

B
Y
CA
D

F
I
L
E
SIT
E

I
D