26043_Carpet Warehouse_EMP_Final Signed_20240326

1
EMP Version 3, March 2023
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Redevelopment Section at the direction of a Brownfields
project manager.
The EMP is a standard requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an effort
to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory-compliant
decision-making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development-related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the EMP to be valid for use, it must be
completed, reviewed by the Section, signed by all parties working on the project, and
approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of the
EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a recorded agreement, be cause for
a reopener.
The EMP is valid only for the scope of work described herein and must be updated to be
applicable for new phases of redevelopment or after significant changes in applicable
regulatory guidance. Risk characterization of a Brownfields Property to DEQ’s written
satisfaction is required prior to EMP approval.
Voluntary Metrics Tab The NC Brownfields Redevelopment Section updates estimated capital investment (from the Brownfields Property Application) and estimated jobs created (from the Brownfields Agreement) whenever possible. As a voluntary measure, you may opt to complete the below information for capital investment and jobs created as estimated by your final redevelopment
plans for the Brownfields Property:
1.Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: $60,000,000
2.Estimated jobs created:
a.Construction Jobs: 100
b.Full Time Post-Redevelopment Jobs: 8-10
2
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Table of Contents
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION .................................................................. 1
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................................................................... 1
GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................ 4
COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 4
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION ..................................................... 5
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS ........................................................................................................................ 5
CONTAMINATED MEDIA ......................................................................................................................... 7
PART 1. SOIL ........................................................................................................................................ 8
PART 2. GROUNDWATER .................................................................................................................. 17
PART 3. SURFACE WATER .................................................................................................................. 19
PART 4. SEDIMENT ............................................................................................................................ 19
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR ......................................................................................................................... 19
PART 6. INDOOR AIR ......................................................................................................................... 20
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM ............................................................................................. 21
CONTINGENCY PLAN ............................................................................................................................. 21
POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING..................................................................................................... 24
APPROVAL SIGNATURES ....................................................................................................................... 25
3
EMP Version 3, March 2023
So that the EMP provides value in protecting Brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing all of the following is premature and may
be returned without comment.
☒Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields project manager.
☒Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields project manager.
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:
☒A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not, conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.
☒A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.
☒Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.
☒A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
onsite after construction grading.
☒Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).
☒A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.
☒Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
☒Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
☐A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.
☐If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
Brownfields approval.
☐Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for import to the Brownfields Property.
4
EMP Version 3, March 2023
☐A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Guidelines.
☐A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.
☐If a Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) is required by the Brownfields
Redevelopment Section, the VIMS plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Date: 5/23/2023 Revision Date (if applicable): 3/4/2024
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Carpet Warehouse
Brownfields Project Number: 26043-22-034
Brownfields Property Address: 923 N. Liberty Street, Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, NC
Brownfields Property Area (acres): 3.41
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
COMMUNICATIONS
A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities in an area that is prominently accessible to site workers. NOTE, THE EMP DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE-SPECIFIC
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.
Prospective Developer (PD): DPJ Residential Acquisitions, LLC
Contact Person: D. Porter Jones
404-735-2134 404-735-2134
Email: [e-mail]

5
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Contractor for PD: Stimmel
Contact Person: Brian Crafford, PE
336-723-1067 x1112 Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: [e-mail]

Environmental Consultant: Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Contact Person: Laura Elliott, PG
336-854-8135 919-451-9710
Email: [e-mail]

Brownfields Redevelopment Section Project Manager: Seth Titley
Phone Numbers: Office: Mobile:
Email: [e-mail]

Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
[e-mail]

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields project manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:

On-site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior ☒

Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior ☒

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours ☒

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours ☒

Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior ☒

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days ☒

REDEVELOPMENT PLANS

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☒Residential ☐Townhomes (Prior written DEQ approval REQUIRED regardless of ownership
structure) ☐Recreational ☐Institutional ☐Commercial ☐Office ☐Retail ☐Industrial

6
EMP Version 3, March 2023
☐Other specify:
Multi-family apartments are planned for the site.

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth-moving activities
at the site:
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
☒ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
☒ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
Remove existing buildings and parking lots, grade site, and redevelop with multi-family
residential building. 46 Units will sit on slab. There are podiums at level 1 within the club and
leasing space (approx. 10,123sf); also at level 2 at the club space (approx. 2,642sf). A Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System planned, and has been submitted to the Brownfields Program.

Commercial: Approx 8,359 square feet
Residential: Approx 247,889 square feet (289 Units planned)
Parking: Approx 117,836 square feet
Open Space: Approx 18,268 square feet (included pool courtyard, dog park, courtyards 1 and 2,
and garage vent courts)

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.

5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
S&EC requirements can be found at: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-and-land-
resources/erosion-and-sediment-control/erosion-and-sediment-control-laws-and-rules
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that earth-work will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.

7
EMP Version 3, March 2023
6) Which category of risk-based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
☒ Residential ☐ Non-Residential or Industrial/Commercial

7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 6/21/2024

b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):

2. Earthwork Phase: July 21, 2024 through January 21, 2025
3. Construction Phase: January 21,2025 through December 21, 2026

c) Additional phases planned? ☐ Yes ☒ No

If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text. d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 12/1/2025

CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Please fill out the sections below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas
of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure overlaying new
construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown
Part 2. Groundwater: .................................... ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown
Part 3. Surface Water: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown ☒ N/A
Part 4. Sediment: .......................................... ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown ☒ N/A
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ......................................... ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown
Part 6. Sub-Slab Soil Vapor: .......................... ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown

8
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Part 7. Indoor Air: ......................................... ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☒ Unknown

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.

PART 1. SOIL
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
The previous Phase I Environmental Site Assessment activities in 2022 identified the potential of
a former on-site dry cleaner, the off-site and up-gradient Salvage Building Materials property,
and the off-site and cross-gradient 893 North Liberty Street Brownfields Site as Recognized
Environmental Conditions. Soil samples collected during the Brownfields Assessment contained
the following constituents at concentrations exceeding the Residential and Protection of
Groundwater PSRGs:
VOCs: Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) (at soil borings B-1 at 3 feet bgs and B-2 at 3 feet bgs),
trichloroethylene (TCE), and 1,2-DCE
SVOCs: (at soil boring B-3)
Metals: Arsenic (at soil borings B-1, B-2, B-3, B-4, B-5, B-6, B-7, B-8, and B-9 at depths between 3
and 7 feet bgs)
Exhibits 3 through 6 and Tables 1 through 3 present summaries of soil, groundwater, and soil

2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):

3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
Appendix B

5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
Appendix B

6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
None. VOC and SVOC constituents in soil samples B-1 and B-3 were detected at relatively low
concentrations and were not detected in underlying groundwater samples.

Soil excavated beyond depths of 3-7 feet bgs should be screened for staining and odors and in

7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:

9
EMP Version 3, March 2023

PART 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ☐Yes ☒No
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).

☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained-Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained-In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes ☒ No

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED-OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED-IN POLICY, THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ONSITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes ☒ No
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
☐ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)

☒ If no, explain rationale:
Field observations and soil sample analyses did not identify VOC, SVOC, or
metals constituents at concentrations likely to exhibit features of characteristic

10
EMP Version 3, March 2023
d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ONSITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH
DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
☒ Preliminary Health-Based Residential SRGs
☐ Preliminary Health-Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
☒ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
☐ Site-specific risk-based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Click or tap here to enter text.

Additional comments:
Click or tap here to enter text.

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields project manager.
☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil onsite map to
Brownfields project manager once known.
☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☐
☒ Describe cap or fill:
Cap would likely be asphalt parking lot/driveway area.
☒ Confer with NC BF project manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-recorded if
actions are Post-Recordation).
☒ GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
☒ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:

4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
VOC-impacted soils already known to be impacting groundwater cannot be moved around the site
and will be left in place.

11
EMP Version 3, March 2023
management of site soils:
☒ Check to confirm that management of fugitive dust from site activities will be handled in
accordance with applicable local, state, and federal requirements.

Field screening of site soil
At a minimum, contractors shall be made aware of protocols should impacted soils (e.g. staining,
unusual odors, fill materials) be identified.

Describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting field
screening:
evidence of potential impacted soil. Evidence of potential impacted soil includes a distinct
unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concern (i.e.
chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be noted during site work, the contractor
will contact the environmental consultant to observe the suspect condition. If the
environmental consultant confirms that the material may be impacted, then the
procedures below will be implemented. In addition, the environmental consultant will
contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within 48 hours to advise that person of

Soil sample collection
☒ Yes

☐ Not anticipated - In order to avoid delays in construction, a plan shall be in place for sampling
of suspect soils should they be encountered during redevelopment. If soil sample collection is
not anticipated but the need to do so is identified during redevelopment, notify the Brownfields
project manager of the anticipated sample and report dates for scheduling purposes.

Describe the sampling method (e.g., in-situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.) and confirm that all
procedures outlined in applicable DEQ guidance for assessment shall be followed Typically, at
least one representative sample (per 500 yd3 for residential and 1,000 yd3 for commercial)
consisting of a 3 to 5-point composite sample with grab sample for VOCs based on the highest PID
reading is required to determine soil management options:
removal of utilities, excavation will proceed only as far as needed to allow grading and/or
construction of the utility to continue.
Suspect impacted soil will be stockpiled in accordance with Appendix E: NCBP Diagram for
Temporary Containment of Impacted or Potentially Impacted Soil.
At least one representative composite soil sample (no less than 3 aliquot soil samples) at
a sample ratio of one soil sample per every approximately 500-cubic yards of soil will be
collected for analysis of total VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium.
If the soil sample laboratory analytical results indicate that the soil could potentially
exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria, then the soil will also be analyzed
by TCLP for those compounds that could exceed the toxicity characteristic hazardous
waste criteria.

12
EMP Version 3, March 2023
with metals below background but above PSRGs will be placed onsite without conditions.
Soil with constituents above PSRGs and/or metals above background levels will be

Check applicable chemical analytes for soil samples:
☒ Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method
8260; Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA
List + Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides):

☒ Check to confirm that by the owner’s signature and the North Carolina Professional
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect
soil sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the
sealing professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines and
methodologies are followed and reported to DEQ for determination and approval of soil
placement prior to final relocation.

If impacted soils above applicable PSRGs and/or site specific risk thresholds are proposed to be
relocated on-site, prior to final placement on-site, the following shall be submitted for DEQ
review/approval
- Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the above referenced frequency and
following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum Requirements Checklist (Checklist) and in
accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of Contaminated Sites
(Guidelines)
- Figure outlining planned soil placement and any future site features including
buildings/hardscape/open areas
- A North Carolina PE/PG recommendation of placement

Impacts Options
Onsite Placement without
conditions
Onsite placement under 2 ft
of cap or clean fill1, 2
All Constituents below applicable
PSRGs X
Constituents3 below applicable
PSRGs; Metals below background X
Constituents3 below applicable

13
EMP Version 3, March 2023
X
1: Requires Prior Written DEQ Approval
2: VOC impacted soils above applicable PSRGs shall not be placed directly beneath building footprints
without prior written DEQ approval.
3: Constituents indicate any samples evaluated for other than metals.

☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted in
accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion control,
prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing
contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as needed:

☒ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes below
(Check all that apply):
☒ Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method
8260; Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA
List + Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides):

Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, indicate if a work
plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
A final grade sampling workplan is provided in Appendix D.

☐ If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale:

PART 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL

NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM
THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION. According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting
Click or tap here to enter text.

14
EMP Version 3, March 2023
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written approval
in advance by the Brownfields Redevelopment Section), will safeguard the liability protections
provided by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective
developer/property owner.”

Requirements for importing fill:
☒ Check to confirm that the import volumes outlined below have been confirmed based on
geotechnical evaluations.

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
activities. Should fill materials be required to support construction activities the fill soils will be
obtained from a local quarry permitted by the North Carolina Mining Inventory Program.

3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range
of depths, list the range.)
Fill soils, if required, would likely be placed at depths of less than approximately 11.5 feet bgs

PRIOR TO SOIL PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, a Soil Import Request must be
submitted for DEQ Brownfields review and approval. The request shall consist of a data
package that details:

- Fill source location/history (Phase I if available, current aerials, etc.)
- Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the below frequency and
following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum Requirements Checklist (Checklist)
and in accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of
Contaminated Sites (Guidelines)
- A table comparing the import soil to existing site concentrations
- A PE/PG recommendation of import
- All relevant attachments listed in the Checklist

Soil Import Sampling Requirements:
Virgin Material from DEQ
Brownfields Pre-None (Contact Brownfields project manager for list of pre-
approved Quarries
DEQ Permitted Quarry
(Not Brownfields Pre-
approved)
representative sample
from area of planned
Metals, any site specific
COCs (e.g. pesticides,

15
EMP Version 3, March 2023
per 1,000 yd3 consisting
of a 3-point composite
sample with grab sample
for VOCs based on the
COCs (e.g. pesticides,
PCBs, etc.) Off-site
unpermitted/regulated
property
from Commercial Vendor No Sampling Required

If other special considerations apply, discuss:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Check to confirm that by the owner’s signature and the North Carolina Professional
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect soil
sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the sealing
professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines are followed and reported in
the Soil Import Request for DEQ approval. Failure to meet these requirements could result in
resampling and/or failure to approve import.

PART 1.C. SOIL EXPORT

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION. Failure to obtain approval may violate a brownfields
agreement causing a reopener or jeopardizing eligibility in the Section, endangering liability
protections and making said action possibly subject to enforcement. Justifications provided
below must be approved by the Section in writing prior to completing transport activities. Refer
to Brownfields IR 15 for additional details.

1) If export from the Brownfields Property is anticipated, export soil must be sampled at a
frequency of one sample per 1,000 yd3 consisting of a 3-point composite sample with a
grab sample for VOCs based on the highest PID reading. Samples shall be analyzed at a
minimum for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals plus any site specific COCs.

PRIOR TO EXPORT FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, a Soil Export Request must be
submitted for DEQ Brownfields review and approval. The request shall consist of a Data
Package that details:

- Proposed Receiving Facility
- Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the above referenced
frequency and following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields
Redevelopment Section Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum
Requirements Checklist (Checklist) and in accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for
Assessment and Cleanup of Contaminated Sites (Guidelines)
- A table comparing the export soil to concentrations on the receiving site concentrations
including risk comparison (Note that calculated risk cannot be increased on the receiving

16
EMP Version 3, March 2023
site)
- A North Carolina PE/PG recommendation of export
- Written approval from the receiving site property owner representative for export
- All relevant attachments listed in the Checklist

Soil Export Options
Impacts
Options
Use as
Beneficial Fill
Off-site disposal at
other Brownfields
2,6,7
at LCID/CD
1, 3 D MSW/Permitted
4
All Constituents below
applicable PSRGs X X X X
Constituents5 below
applicable PSRGs; Metals
below background but X X X
Constituents5 below
applicable PSRGs; Metals X X X
Constituents above
Applicable PSRGs X X
1: Requires Prior Written DEQ Approval
2: VOC impacted soils above applicable PSRGs shall not be placed directly beneath building footprints
without prior written DEQ approval.
3: Requires comparison to site specific metals concentrations.
4: Facility to determine if they can accept soil within their permit.
5: Constituents indicate any samples evaluated for other than metals.
6: Requires written approval from receiving site property owner representative.
7. Site COCs must be in comparable concentrations to receiving site and not significantly raise risk of
the receiving site.

☒ Check to confirm that by the owner’s signature and the North Carolina Professional
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect soil
sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the sealing
professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines are followed and reported in
the Soil Export Request for DEQ approval. Failure to meet these requirements could result in
resampling and/or failure to approve export.

If other special considerations apply, discuss:
Click or tap here to enter text.

PART 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES

☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)

17
EMP Version 3, March 2023
☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were
removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth
from which it was excavated.

☒ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants.
☒ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials or provide the results of this evaluation in the
Vapor Mitigation Plan. Note that if vapor mitigation is planned for site buildings, utility corridors
will need to be evaluated as part of mitigation designs:

☐ If no, include rationale here:

☐ Unknown, details to be provided in the Vapor Mitigation Plan for site buildings

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Soil samples collected during the collected during the Brownfields Assessment contained the
following constituents at concentrations exceeding state action levels:
VOCs: Tetrachloroethylene (samples B-1 at 3 feet bgs and B-2 at 3 feet bgs)
Metals: Arsenic (samples B-1, B-2, B-3, B-4, B-5, B-6, B-7, B-8, and B-9 at depths between 3 and
7 feet bgs).
Arsenic was detected in 12 soil samples, and given similar concentrations evenly distributed
over the site, arsenic is likely a naturally occurring element.
Should impacted soils be encountered in utility trenches, the procedures described above in Part
1A. Managing Onsite Soils will be implemented. The analytical results will be compared to the
respective Health Based Residential PSRGs and NCDEQ vapor intrusion screening levels, and the

PART 2. GROUNDWATER

1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
Approximately 17 to 29 feet below ground surface

2) What is the maximum depth of soil disturbance onsite?
Approximately 11.5 feet bgs

3) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☐onsite ☐offsite ☒both or ☐unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
ranging from 1.56 to 4.98 μg/L, which exceed the 15A NCAC 2L Groundwater Quality Standard.
These three samples are located at the northwest portion of the site.

18
EMP Version 3, March 2023

4) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?

5) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities (e.g.
footer/utility construction or helical pilings?)
☐Yes ☒No
If yes, describe these activities:
In the event that groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or sampling procedures).
activities in such a way that it impedes progress, dewatered groundwater will be containerized
for characterization prior to off-site disposal at a facility permitted to accept the water.

6) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☒Yes ☐No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes ☒No

7) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
☒ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Redevelopment Section’s intent to allow proper abandonment of
well(s) as specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active
monitoring through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
☐ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
☐ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
☒ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.

8) Please provide additional details as needed:

Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.

19 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
PART 3. SURFACE WATER 
1) Is surface water present at the property?  ☐ Yes ☒ No  
2) If yes, attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property 
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes  ☒ No  ☐ Unknown 
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment 
activities or as part of the final redevelopment?    ☐ Yes  ☒ No 
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment 
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of 
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run‐off, stormwater impacts): 
Excavations will be protected from stormwater runoff by utilizing berms and drainage trenches  

PART 4. SEDIMENT 
1) Are sediment sources present on the property?  ☐ Yes  ☒ No 
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes  ☐ No ☐ Unknown 
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment 
activities?   ☐ Yes ☒ No 
4) Attach a map showing the location of known contaminated sediment at the property. 
5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance): 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

PART 5.  SOIL VAPOR 

1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the 
vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media: 

 Groundwater Exterior Soil Vapor Sub‐Slab Soil Vapor 
Residential ☒ Yes ☐ No   
☐ Unknown 
☒ Yes ☐ No   
☐ Unknown 
☒ Yes ☐ No   
☐ Unknown 
Commercial ☒ Yes ☐ No   
☐ Unknown 
☒ Yes ☐ No   
☐ Unknown 
☒ Yes ☐ No   
☐ Unknown 

2) Attach a map showing the locations of all soil vapor samples including any soil vapor 
contaminants that exceeds screening levels and overlays planned site development features.  

3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is exterior soil vapor known to be contaminated?  
  10 feet bgs in SVP‐1, SVP‐2, and SVP‐3 
20
EMP Version 3, March 2023
4)If applicable, at what depth(s) is sub-slab soil vapor known to be contaminated?
☒0-6 inches ☐Other, please describe:
5) Will workers encounter contaminated exterior or sub-slab soil vapor during plannedredevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
In the event that apparent contaminated soil vapor is encountered (based on elevated PID
readings, unusual odors, etc.) during redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or
other subsurface work,) list activities for management of such contact, INCLUDING notification to
DEQ within 48 hours of identification of the issue for determination of additional requirements:
Soil vapor probe samples SVP-1, SVP-2, and SVP-3, all advanced in the area of the former dry
cleaner, contained elevated concentrations of PCE, cis-1,2-DCE, and vinyl chloride; sample SVP-2
also contained TCE. Other VOCs were also detected in the samples. The Risk Calculator indicated
that, for direct contact with soil and water, the carcinogenic and hazard index risk values were
not exceeded for site residents or non-residential workers. For vapor intrusion, the carcinogenic
and hazard index risk values were exceeded for residents for the soil gas to indoor air pathway.
pathway (residents) and the soil gas to indoor air pathway (non-
that potentially contaminated soil vapor is encountered during the redevelopment activities, an
environmental professional will assess the condition, notify the DEQ within 48 hours of
identification, and discuss options with the Brownfields Program, and collect additional soil
vapor samples in accordance with Brownfields Program guidance.
Sub-slab soil vapor concentrations were elevated in SVP-10. The existing on-site buildings will be
demolished prior to earthwork and construction activities commencing at the site. The vapor
mitigation system being installed beneath the new foundation will reduce the potential for site
workers to encounter contaminated sub-slab soil vapor. In the event that potentially
contaminated sub-slab soil vapor is encountered during the redevelopment activities, an
environmental professional will assess the condition, notify the DEQ within 48 hours of
identification, and discuss options with the Brownfields Program, and collect additional soil

PART 6. INDOOR AIR
1)Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No
2)If applicable, attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site
screening levels.
3)If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk-based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown ☐ N/A
☐If no, include rationale here:
21
EMP Version 3, March 2023

4)In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM
1)Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☒Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☐If no or unknown, include rationale here as well as plans for pre-occupancy sampling, as
necessary:
If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☒ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:

VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer and follow the DEQ Brownfields Redevelopment Section’s Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System Design Submittal Requirements.
Note that approval of this EMP does not imply approval with any vapor intrusion mitigation land
use restrictions or requirements of the recorded or draft Brownfields Agreement and that
separate approval of mitigation measures will be required.
CONTINGENCY PLAN
In this section, please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields project manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.
the findings of the Brownfields Assessment, it does not appear likely that contaminated indoor air
would be encountered during redevelopment activities. If potentially contaminated indoor air is
encountered, an industrial hygienist will assess the condition and determine what types of samples
(soil, soil vapor, sub-slab soil vapor, indoor air), if any, need to be collected. Worker protections could
include the installation of engineering controls during construction to recirculate outdoor air into the
building. Depending on the preliminary findings, Terracon will discuss options with the Brownfields
Program, and develop potential response options in accordance with Brownfields Program guidance.
22
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields project manager will be notified, and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site-specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.
Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
☒Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260;
Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA List +
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199
☐Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
☐PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
☐Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
Underground Storage Tanks – Note that UST Section guidelines must be followed for sample
frequency during UST closure. Unless damage to onsite structures to remain as part of
redevelopment would occur, USTs shall be removed from the Brownfields Property:
environmental professional can visit the site. The environmental professional will assess the
situation and report to the DEQ within 48 hours of discovery. The tank will be inspected to
determine if any product remains in the tank. The contents of the tank will be evaluated, analyzed,
and disposed of at a licensed off-site facility in accordance with regulatory requirements and DEQ
approval. Unless an alternative approach is approved by DEQ, the tank will be removed in
accordance with applicable UST regulations. Following appropriate health and safety protocols
surrounding soil and soil at the base of the tank will be screened with a photoionization detector
(PID) and flame ionization detector (FID), the breathing zone will be monitored using a PID/FID,
and confirmatory soil sampling and/or remedial activities will be conducted to the
satisfaction of DEQ.
Sampling locations will be selected as outlined in the most recent version of Site Checks, Tank
Closure and initial Response and Abatement for UST Releases (UST Section, DEQ, Division of Waste
Management). Samples will be analyzed as referenced above, and impacted soil associated with
the UST will be managed in accordance with the Managing On-Site Soil section of this EMP.
Sub-Grade Feature/Pit:

23
EMP Version 3, March 2023
unusual odors or staining, construction activities will cease in the immediate area until an
environmental professional can visit the site. The environmental professional will assess the feature
and screen soils for the potential presence of volatile organic constituents using a PID. If it appears
that the sub-grade feature or pit contains impacted soils, a minimum volume of impacted soils
necessary to support construction will be removed and stockpiled on-site pending characterization.
For characterization, at least one representative composite soil sample (no less than 3 aliquot soil
samples) at a sample ratio of one soil sample per every approximately 500-cubic yards of soil will be
collected for analysis of total VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium. Analysis
may include TCLP if deemed necessary for disposal purposes.
The sub-grade feature or pit will then be removed or backfilled in accordance with construction
specifications. Confirmation sampling will be conducted at representative locations in the base and
sidewalls of the excavation for the parameters noted above. The environmental professional will
notify the Brownfields Project Manager within 48 hours of discovery of the conditions encountered

Buried Waste Material – Note that if buried waste, non-native fill, or any obviously filled materials
is encountered, the DEQ Brownfields Redevelopment Section must be notified to determine if
investigation of landfill gases is required:
until an environmental professional can visit the site. The environmental professional will assess the
buried materials and screen soils for the potential presence of volatile organic constituents using a
PID, and methane using a flame-ionization detector (FID). The buried waste will be removed to the
extent practicable, and if it appears that impacted soils are present, only the volume of soils
planned to support construction at that location will be removed and stockpiled on-site pending
characterization.
For characterization, at least one representative composite soil sample (no less than 3 aliquot soil
samples) at a sample ratio of one soil sample per every approximately 500-cubic yards of soil will be
collected for analysis of total VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium. Analysis
may include TCLP if deemed necessary for disposal purposes.
Confirmation sampling will be conducted at representative locations in the base and sidewalls of
the excavation for the parameters noted above. The environmental professional will notify the
Brownfields Project Manager within 48 hours of discovery and will report on the conditions
encountered and actions taken. If waste materials cannot be fully excavated their continued
presence will need to be evaluated from both a geotechnical perspective and for methane and/or
soil vapor generating potential. The environmental professional will contact the Brownfields
Project Manager for guidance.

Re-Use of Impacted Soils Onsite:
Please refer to Part 1.A above.

If unknown, impacted soil is identified onsite, management onsite can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
project manager approval prior to final placement onsite.
24
EMP Version 3, March 2023
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
Click or tap here to enter text.
POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
☒Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the project manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 1/31/2025
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment-related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1.actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2.soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3.methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4.stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5.removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).
☒Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement.
3/26/24

26
EMP Version 3, March 2023

EXHIBITS

Exhibit 1 – Site Location Map
Exhibit 2 – Site Map
Exhibit 3 – Soil Analytical Results (April 2023)
Exhibit 4 – Groundwater Analytical Data (April 2023)
Exhibit 5 – Exterior Soil Vapor Analytical Data (April 2023)
Exhibit 6 – Sub-Slab Soil Vapor Analytical Data (April 2023)
SITE LOCATION MAP
Carpet Warehouse
923 N. Liberty Street Winston-Salem, NC
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IMAGE COURTESY OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
7327 W Friendly Ave Ste G
Greensboro, NC 27410-6253
75227127Project Manager:
Drawn by:
Checked by:
Approved by:
JWR
EW
EW
1”=2,000’
Warehouse
April 2023
Project No.
Scale:
File Name:
Date: 1
LRE Exhibit
APPROXIMATE
SITE BOUNDARY
EXHIBIT NO.
File Path:
Date:
PM:
Drawn By:
Checked By:
Approved By:
Project No.
Scale:
2
75227127LRE
JWR
EW
7327-G West Friendly Avenue Greensboro, NC 27410
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]/2023
Site Map
Carpet Warehouse923 N. Liberty Street
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, NC
Service Layer Credits:Source: Esri, Maxar,Earthstar Geographics,and the GIS UserCommunity
Legend
Site Boundary
Parcel Boundaries
Assumed Location of Possible Former Drycleaner
6835-39-4843.000
(Former Salvage Building Supply)
6835-39-8567.0006835-39-7585.000
6835-39-8642.000
6835-39-7523.000
6832-39-4439.000
Martin Luth
e
r

K
i
n
g

J
r
.

D
r
i
v
e
0 125 25062.5 Feet
As Shown
6835-39-5574.000
6835-39-7772.000
6835-39-8563.000
North L
i
b
e
r
t
y

S
t
r
e
e
t
Ivy

A
v
e
<---(US Brownfields site toward west)
&>
&>
&>
&>
&>
&>
&>
&>
&>
EXHIBIT NO.
File Path:
Date:
PM:
Drawn By:
Checked By:
Approved By:
Project No.
Scale:
3
75227127LRE
JWR
EW
EW 7327-G West Friendly Avenue Greensboro, NC 27410
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]/2023
Soil Analytical Results (April 2023)
Legend
&>Soil Boring
Site Boundary
Parcel Boundaries
Martin Luther King Jr. Drive
0 160 32080Feet
As Shown
SVP-3 / B-3
SVP-2 / B-2
SVP-1 / B-1
SVP-7 / B-7
SVP-8 / B-8
SVP-9 / B-9
SVP-5 / B-5
SVP-6 / B-6
SVP-4 / B-4
North Liberty Street
Ivy Ave
B-1 (3 ft bgs)VOCs by Method 8260Dcis-1,2-Dichloroethene: 0.0117 mg/kgTetrachloroethylene:0.041 mg/kgTrichloroethylene: 0.0124 mg/kgMetals by 6020BArsenic: 5.42 mg/kgBarium: 48.5 mg/kgChromium: 34 mg/kgLead: 21.2 mg/kgSelenium: 1.00 J mg/kgMercury by 7471BMercury: 0.11 mg/kg
B-1 (7 ft bgs)VOCs by Method 8260DCis-1,2-Dichloroethene: 0.00618 mg/kgTetrachloroethylene: 0.00307 J mg/kgMetals by 6020BArsenic: 3.98 mg/kgBarium: 28.2 mg/kgChromium: 65.3 mg/kgLead: 27.2 mg/kgSelenium: 1.13 J mg/kgMercury by 7471BMercury: 0.0245 J mg/kg
B-2 (3 ft bgs)VOCs by Method 8260Dcis-1,2-Dichloroethene: 0.0317 mg/kgTetrachloroethylene:0.00755 mg/kgMetals by 6020BArsenic: 5.5 mg/kgBarium: 36.2 mg/kgChromium: 90.7 mg/kgLead: 22.5 mg/kgSelenium: 1.28 J mg/kgMercury by 7471BMercury: 0.0434 J mg/kg
B-2 (7 ft bgs)VOCs by Method 8260DCis-1,2-Dichloroethene: 0.0268 mg/kgTetrachloroethylene:0.00524 mg/kgMetals by 6020BArsenic: 3.57 mg/kgBarium: 18.8 mg/kgChromium: 31.6 mg/kgLead: 18.3 mg/kgSelenium: 1.10 J mg/kgMercury by 7471BMercury: 0.0454 J mg/kg
B-3 (3 ft bgs)VOCs by Method 8260DCis-1,2-Dichloroethene: 0.00462 J mg/kgStyrene: 0.00677 J mg/kgTotal Xylenes: 0.00241 J mg/kgSVOCs by Method 8270CBenzo(b)fluoranthene: 0.0111 J mg/kgBenzo(a)pyrene: 0.0112 J mg/kgPyrene: 0.0109 J mg/kgMetals by 6020BArsenic: 6.74 mg/kgBarium: 53.5 mg/kgChromium: 48.7 mg/kgLead: 18.6 mg/kgSelenium: 1.00 J mg/kgMercury by 7471BMercury: 0.133 mg/kg
B-3 (7 ft bgs)VOCs by Method 8260DBenzene: 0.000766 J mg/kgcis-1,2-Dichloroethene: 0.0107 mg/kg1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene: 0.00267 J mg/kgTotal Xylenes: 0.00242 J mg/kgMetals by 6020BArsenic: 6.01 mg/kgBarium: 34.7 mg/kgChromium: 72.3 mg/kgLead: 18.1 mg/kgSelenium: 1.27 J mg/kgMercury by 7471BMercury: 0.0390 J mg/kg
B-4 (3 ft bgs)Metals by 6020BArsenic: 4.6 mg/kgBarium: 15.1 mg/kgChromium: 88.3 mg/kgLead: 12.6 mg/kgSelenium: 1.22 J mg/kgMercury by 7471BMercury: 0.0320 J mg/kg
B-4 (7 ft bgs)Metals by 6020BArsenic: 2.41 mg/kgBarium: 9.64 mg/kgChromium: 46.2 mg/kgLead: 10 mg/kgSelenium: 0.816 J mg/kg
B-5 (3 ft bgs)Metals by 6020BArsenic: 8.41mg/kgBarium: 57.6 mg/kgChromium: 80.4 mg/kgLead: 20 mg/kgSelenium: 1.43 J mg/kgMercury by 7471BMercury: 0.122 mg/kgHexavalent Chromium by 7199Hexavalent Chromium: 2.32 J mg/kg
B-5 (7 ft bgs)Metals by 6020BArsenic: 1.27 mg/kgBarium: 86 mg/kgChromium: 64.6 mg/kgLead: 5.54 mg/kgSelenium: 0.381 J mg/kg
B-6 (3 ft bgs)Metals by 6020BArsenic: 5.89 mg/kgBarium: 52.2 mg/kgChromium: 53.2 mg/kgLead: 15.4 mg/kgSelenium: 1.13 J mg/kgMercury by 7471BMercury: 0.106 mg/kg
DUP-1 (B-6 at 3 ft bgs)Metals by 6020BArsenic: 3.35 mg/kgBarium: 67.1 mg/kgChromium: 35.4 mg/kgLead: 12 mg/kgSelenium: 0.962 J mg/kgMercury by 7471BMercury: 0.0349 J mg/kg
B-6 (10 ft bgs)Metals by 6020BArsenic: 1.26 J mg/kgBarium: 81.9 mg/kgChromium: 44.3 mg/kgLead: 16.1 mg/kgSelenium: 0.604 J mg/kg
B-8 (3 ft bgs)Metals by 6020BArsenic: 6.57 mg/kgBarium: 45 mg/kgChromium: 53.9 mg/kgLead: 18.4 mg/kgSelenium: 1.16 J mg/kgMercury by 7471BMercury: 0.0625 mg/kg
B-8 (7 ft bgs)VOCs by Method 8260DToluene: 0.00211 J mg/kgMetals by 6020BArsenic: 2.16 mg/kgBarium: 86.2 mg/kgChromium: 88.7 mg/kgLead: 12.8 mg/kgSelenium: 0.685 J mg/kg
B-9 (3 ft bgs)VOCs by Method 8260DToluene: 0.00345 J mg/kgMetals by 6020BArsenic: 1.72 mg/kgBarium: 34.6 mg/kgChromium: 39.8 mg/kgLead: 15.2 mg/kgSelenium: 0.604 J mg/kg
B-9 (7 ft bgs)Metals by 6020BBarium: 117 mg/kgChromium: 50.2 mg/kgLead: 3.43 mg/kgSelenium: 0.325 J mg/kg
Carpet Warehouse923 N. Liberty Street
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, NC
Concentrations above the Protection of Groundwater PSRG are in BOLDCencentrations above the Residential Health Based PSRG are in RED
µg/L = micrograms per literBDL = Analytes below laboratory method detection limitsVOCs = Volatile organic compoundsft bgs = feet below ground surfacemg/kg = milligrams per kilogramJ: Reported value is an estimate
B-7 (3 ft bgs)Metals by 6020BArsenic: 6.08mg/kgBarium: 34.9 mg/kg
Chromium: 78.1 mg/kgLead: 18.5 mg/kgSelenium: 1.29 J mg/kgMercury by 7471BMercury: 0.116 mg/kg
B-7 (7 ft bgs)Metals by 6020BArsenic: 1.05 J mg/kgBarium: 100 mg/kgChromium: 48.3 mg/kgLead: 4.01 mg/kgSelenium: 0.403 J mg/kg
@A
@A
@A
@A
@A
EXHIBIT NO.
File Path:
Date:
PM:
Drawn By:
Checked By:
Approved By:
Project No.
Scale:
4
75227127LRE
JWR
EW
EW 7327-G West Friendly Avenue Greensboro, NC 27410Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]/2023
Groundwater Analytical Data (April 2023)
Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, Maxar,Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS UserCommunity
Legend
@A Monitoring Well
Site BoundaryParcel Boundaries
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
Martin Luther King Jr. Drive
0 190 38095Feet
As Shown
MW-5
North Liberty Street Ivy Ave
MW-1VOCs by 8260Dcis-1,2-Dichloroethene = 0.434 J μg/LTetrachloroethylene = 4.98 μg/L1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene = 0.226 J μg/L1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene = 0.170 J μg/LSVOCs by 8270ENDMercury by 7470AMercury = 0.639 μg/LHexavalent Chromium by 3500 CrNDMetals by 6020BBarium = 317 μg/LChromium = 8.75 J μg/L
Concentrations above 2L Standards are in BOLDµg/L = micrograms per literND = Analytes not detected above laboratory method detection limitsJ: Reported value is an estimate
MW-3VOCs by 8260DNDSVOCs by 8270EBenzo(a)anthracene = 0.234 J μg/LBenzo(b)fluoranthene = 0.139 J μg/LBenzo(k)fluoranthene = 0.153 J μg/LBenzo(a)pyrene = 0.105 J μg/LChrysene = 0.176 J μg/LDibenz(a,h)anthracene = 0.101 J μg/LFluoranthene = 0.233 J μg/LPyrene = 0.221 J μg/LMercury by 7470AMercury = 0.122 J μg/LHexavalent Chromium by 3500 CrNDMetals by 6020BArsenic= 12.5 μg/LBarium = 86.9 μg/L
MW-4VOCs by 8260DTetrachloroethylene = 0.432 J μg/LSVOCs by 8270ENDMercury by 7470ANDHexavalent Chromium by 3500 CrNDMetals by 6020BArsenic: 7.02 J μg/LBarium = 79.1 μg/L
MW-5VOCs by 8260DBenzene = 65.6 μg/Ln-Butylbenzene = 0.261 J μg/Lsec-Butylbenzene = 0.234 J μg/LChloroform = 0.440 J μg/L1,2-Dichloroethane = 1.23 μg/Lcis-1,2-Dichloroethene = 0.210 J μg/LDi-Isopropyl Ether = 0.976 J μg/LEthylbenzene = 4.66 μg/LIsopropylbenzene = 1.49 μg/L4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) = 0.492 J μg/Ln-propylbenzene = 1.89 μg/LTetrachloroethylene = 2.10 μg/LToluene = 0.897 J μg/L1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene = 11.5 μg/L1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene = 10.0 μg/L1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene = 3.73 μg/LTotal Xylenes = 77.6 μg/LSVOCs by 8270EIsophorone = 0.158 J μg/LNaphthalene = 0.655 J μg/LMercury by 7470ANDHexavalent Chromium by 3500 CrNDMetals by 6020BBarium = 115 μg/LLead = 3.25 J μg/LChromium = 47.2 μg/L
DUP-1VOCs by 8260DBenzene = 49.0 μg/Ln-Butylbenzene = 0.233 J μg/Lsec-Butylbenzene = 0.168 J μg/LChloroform = 0.396 J μg/L1,2-Dichloroethane = 0.978 J μg/LDi-Isopropyl Ether = 0.782 J μg/LEthylbenzene = 3.17 μg/LIsopropylbenzene = 1.07 μg/Ln-Propylbenzene = 1.32 μg/LTetrachloroethylene = 1.56 μg/LToluene = 0.679 J μg/L1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene = 9.65 μg/L1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene = 7.83 μg/L1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene = 3.08 μg/LTotal Xylenes = 58.1 μg/LSVOCs by 8270ENaphthalene = 0.962 J μg/LMercury by 7470ANDHexavalent Chromium by 3500 CrNDMetals by 6020BLead = 6.05 μg/LBarium = 116 μg/LChromium = 33.0 μg/L
Carpet Warehouse923 N. Liberty StreetWinston-Salem, Forsyth County, NC
MW-2VOCs by 8260DBDLSVOCs by 8270EBDLMercury by 7470ABDLHexavalent Chromium by 3500 CrBDLMetals by 6020BLead = 3.13 J μg/LBarium = 47.9 μg/LChromium = 3.96 J μg/L
#*
#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
EXHIBIT NO.
File Path:
Date:
PM:
Drawn By:
Checked By:
Approved By:
Project No.
Scale:
5
75227127LRE
JWR
EW
EW 7327-G West Friendly Avenue Greensboro, NC 27410
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]/2023
Exterior Soil Vapor Analytical Data (April 2023)
Service Layer Credits:Source: Esri, Maxar,
Earthstar Geographics,and the GIS User
Community
Legend
#*Soil Vapor Probe
Site Boundary
Parcel Boundaries
SVP-3
SVP-2
SVP-6
SVP-5
SVP-7
Martin Luther King Jr. Drive
0 100 20050Feet
As Shown
SVP-8
SVP-9
SVP-1
SVP-4North Liberty Street
Ivy Ave
SVP-1VOCs by Method TO-15Benzene: 260 J µg/m3Cyclohexane: 3,500 µg/m3cis-1,2-Dichloroethene: 4,200 µg/m3trans-1,2-Dichloroethene: 550 J µg/m3Heptane: 1,800 µg/m3Hexane: 7,900 µg/m3Tetrachloroethylene: 7,600 µg/m3Toluene: 200 J µg/m3Trichloroethylene: 900 J µg/m31,2,4-Trimethylbenzene: 360 J µg/m31,3,5-Trimethylbenzene: 750 J µg/m32,2,4-Trimethylpentane: 69,000 µg/m3Vinyl Chloride: 690 µg/m3
SVP-2VOCs by Method TO-15Cyclohexane: 24,000 µg/m3cis-1,2-Dichloroethene: 16,000 µg/m3trans-1,2-Dichloroethene: 530 J µg/m3Heptane: 26,000 µg/m3Hexane: 51,000 µg/m3Tetrachloroethylene: 12,000 µg/m3Trichloroethylene: 3,400 µg/m32,2,4-Trimethylpentane: 570,000 µg/m3Vinyl Chloride: 2,800 µg/m3
SVP-3VOCs by Method TO-15Cyclohexane: 57,000 µg/m3cis-1,2-Dichloroethene: 34,000 µg/m3Ethylbenzene: 7,500 µg/m34-Ethyltoluene: 2,400 J µg/m3Heptane: 79,000 µg/m3Hexane: 100,000 µg/m3Propylbenzene: 1,500 J µg/m3Tetrachloroethylene: 4,200 J µg/m3Toluene: 3,000 J µg/m3Trichloroethylene: 3,100 J µg/m31,2,4-Trimethylbenzene: 4,200 J µg/m31,3,5-Trimethylbenzene: 1,800 J µg/m32,2,4-Trimethylpentane: 1,600,000 µg/m3Vinyl Chloride: 7,400 µg/m3m,p-Xylenes: 16,000 µg/m3o-Xylenes: 1,700 J µg/m3
SVP-4VOCs by Method TO-15Acetone: 260 µg/m3Benzene: 2.4 J µg/m3Cumene: 3.6 J µg/m3Ethanol: 24 µg/m3Ethylbenzene: 13 µg/m34-Ethyltoluene: 26 µg/m3Freon 11: 2.0 J µg/m3Hexane: 4.1 µg/m32-Butanone (MEK): 25 µg/m32-Propanol: 16 µg/m3Propylbenzene: 6.9 µg/m3Tetrachloroethylene: 3.9 J µg/m3Toluene: 140 µg/m31,2,4-Trimethylbenzene: 30 µg/m31,3,5-Trimethylbenzene: 12 µg/m32,2,4-Trimethylpentane: 18 µg/m3m,p-Xylenes: 54 µg/m3o-Xylenes: 16 µg/m3
SVP-5VOCs by Method TO-15 Acetone: 180 µg/m3Benzene: 3.0 J µg/m3Cyclohexane: 1.2 J µg/m3Ethanol: 22 µg/m3Ethylbenzene: 1.5 J µg/m3Freon 12: 2.3 J µg/m32-Butanone (MEK): 27 µg/m32-Propanol: 9.8 J µg/m3 Tetrachloroethylene: 6.2 J µg/m3 Toluene: 52 µg/m3 1,2,3-Trimethylbenzene 2.8 J µg/m3 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene: 2.2 J µg/m3 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane: 13 µg/m3 m&p-Xylenes: 3.2 J µg/m3o-Xylenes: 1.4 J µg/m3
SVP-6VOCs by Method TO-15Acetone: 200 µg/m3Ethanol: 28 µg/m3Freon 12: 2.0 J µg/m3 2-Butanone (MEK): 15 µg/m32-Propanol: 7.0 J µg/m3Tetrachloroethylene: 46 µg/m3Toluene: 4.2 J µg/m3 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane: 1.8 J µg/m3
SVP-7VOCs by Method TO-15Acetone: 140 µg/m3Benzene: 1.6 J µg/m3Ethanol: 23 µg/m3Freon 12: 2.1 J µg/m3 Hexane: 3.6 J µg/m3 2-Butanone: 12 J µg/m32-Propanol: 12 µg/m3Toluene: 33 µg/m32,2,4-Trimethylpentane: 14 µg/m3
SVP-8VOCs by Method TO-15Acetone: 220 µg/m3Ethanol: 20 J µg/m3 Freon 12: 1.9 J µg/m32-Butanone (MEK): 26 µg/m32-Propanol: 11 J µg/m3 Toluene: 5.1 J µg/m3 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane: 9.8 µg/m3
SVP-9VOCs by Method TO-15Acetone: 170 µg/m3Ethanol: 12 J µg/m3Freon 12: 2.4 J µg/m32-Butanone: 12 J µg/m32-Propanol: 5.2 J µg/m3
Carpet Warehouse923 N. Liberty Street
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, NC
#*
#*#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
EXHIBIT NO.
File Path:
Date:
PM:
Drawn By:
Checked By:
Approved By:
Project No.
Scale:
6
75227127LRE
JWR
EW
EW 7327-G West Friendly Avenue Greensboro, NC 27410
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]/2023
Sub-Slab Soil Vapor Analytical Data (April 2023)
Service Layer Credits:Source: Esri, Maxar,Earthstar Geographics,and the GIS UserCommunity
Legend
#*Soil Vapor Probe
Site Boundary
Parcel Boundaries
SVP-11 (DUP-1)
SVP-10
Martin Luther King Jr. Drive
0 60 12030Feet
As Shown
SVP-12
SVP-13
SVP-14
SVP-15 SVP-16
North Liberty Street
SVP-10VOCs by Method TO-15Acetone: 150 µg/m3Ethanol: 21 µg/m3Freon 11: 1.5 J µg/m3Freon 12: 2.6 J µg/m32-Butanone (MEK): 13 µg/m32-Propanol: 14 µg/m3Tetrachloroethylene: 2,000 µg/m31,1,1-Trichloroethane: 2.0 J µg/m3
SVP-11VOCs by Method TO-15Acetone: 220 µg/m3Ethanol: 32 µg/m3Freon 11: 1.5 J µg/m3Freon 12: 2.5 J µg/m3 2-Butanone (MEK): 21 µg/m32-Propanol: 12 µg/m3Tetrachloroethylene: 110 µg/m3
DUP-1VOCs by Method TO-15Acetone: 140 µg/m3Ethanol: 15 J µg/m3Freon 11: 1.4 J µg/m3Freon 12: 2.4 J µg/m32-Butanone (MEK): 20 µg/m32-Propanol: 9.8 J µg/m3Tetrachloroethylene: 100 µg/m3 SVP-12VOCs by Method TO-15Acetone: 16 J µg/m3Freon 11: 1.4 J µg/m3Freon 12: 2.4 J µg/m3 Tetrachloroethylene: 26 µg/m3
SVP-13VOCs by Method TO-15Acetone: 380 µg/m3Ethanol: 26 µg/m3Freon 11: 1.3 J µg/m3Freon 12: 2.3 J µg/m32-Butanone (MEK): 20 µg/m32-Propanol: 15 µg/m3Tetrachloroethylene: 57 µg/m3m,p Xylenes: 2.2 J µg/m3
SVP-14VOCs by Method TO-15Acetone: 36 µg/m3Freon 12: 2.0 J µg/m32-Butanone: 2.2 J µg/m32-Propanol: 6.0 J µg/m3Tetrachloroethylene: 35 µg/m3Trichloroethylene: 1.3 J µg/m3
SVP-15VOCs by Method TO-15Acetone: 17 J µg/m3 Freon 12: 2.2 J µg/m32-Butanone: 1.7 J µg/m3Tetrachloroethylene: 110 µg/m3Trichloroethylene: 1.9 J µg/m3
SVP-16VOCs by Method TO-15Acetone: 17 J µg/m3 Freon 12: 2.0 J µg/m3Tetrachloroethylene: 27 µg/m3
Carpet Warehouse923 N. Liberty Street
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, NC

TABLES

Table 1 – Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Table 2 – Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Table 3 – Summary of Soil Vapor Analytical Results
TABLE 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Carpet Warehouse
923 N. Liberty Street
Winston‐Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
Terracon Project No. 75227127
Method 7471B Method 7199
Sample
I.D. Depth (ft)
Date Collected
(mm/dd/yy)
B-1@3 ft 3 04/04/23 <0.00108 0.0117 <0.000530 0.041 <0.00301 0.0124 <0.00366 <0.00204 <0.00984 <0.00981 <0.0103 5.42 48.5 34 21.2 1.00 J 0.11 <1.01
B-1@7 ft 7 04/04/23 <0.000768 0.00618 <0.000377 0.00307 J <0.00214 <0.000960 <0.00260 <0.00145 <0.00807 <0.00804 <0.00842 3.98 28.2 65.3 27.2 1.13 J 0.0245 J <0.831
B-2@3 ft 3 04/04/23 <0.000771 0.0317 <0.000378 0.00755 <0.00215 <0.000964 <0.00261 <0.00145 <0.00806 <0.00804 <0.00841 5.5 36.2 90.7 22.5 1.28 J 0.0434 J <0.831
B-2@7 ft 7 04/04/23 <0.000803 0.0268 <0.000394 0.00524 <0.00223 <0.00100 <0.00272 <0.00151 <0.00822 <0.00819 <0.00858 3.57 18.8 31.6 18.3 1.10 J 0.0454 J <0.847
B-3@3 ft 3 04/04/23 <0.00105 0.00462 J 0.00677 J <0.00202 <0.00293 <0.00132 <0.00356 0.00241 J 0.0111 J 0.0112 J 0.0109 J 6.74 53.5 48.7 18.6 1.00 J O1 0.133 <0.999
B-3@7 ft 7 04/04/23 0.000766 J 0.0107 <0.000334 <0.00131 <0.00190 <0.000852 0.00267 J 0.00242 J <0.00751 <0.00749 <0.00784 6.01 34.7 72.3 18.1 1.27 J 0.0390 J <0.774
B-4@3 ft 3 04/04/23 <0.000911 <0.00143 <0.000477 <0.00175 <0.00254 <0.00114 <0.00308 <0.00172 <0.00896 <0.00894 <0.00935 4.6 15.1 88.3 12.6 1.22 J 0.0320 J <0.924
B-4@7 ft 7 04/04/23 <0.00103 <0.00161 <0.000504 <0.00197 <0.00286 <0.00128 <0.00346 <0.00193 <0.00964 <0.00961 <0.0101 2.41 9.64 46.2 10 0.816 J <0.0621 <0.994
B-5@3 ft 3 04/04/23 <0.000877 <0.00138 <0.000430 <0.00168 <0.00244 <0.00110 <0.00297 <0.00165 <0.00880 <0.00878 <0.00919 8.41 57.6 80.4 20 1.43 J 0.122 2.32 J
B-5@7 ft 7 04/04/23 <0.000618 <0.000971 <0.000303 <0.00119 <0.00172 <0.000773 <0.00209 <0.00116 <0.00721 <0.00719 <0.00752 1.27 86 64.6 5.54 0.381 J <0.0464 <0.743 P1
B-6@3 ft 3 04/04/23 <0.000970 <0.00152 <0.000476 <0.00186 <0.00270 <0.00121 <0.00914 <0.00183 <0.00922 <0.00919 <0.00962 5.89 52.2 53.2 15.4 1.13 J 0.106 <0.950
DUP-1 (B-6@3 ft) 3 04/04/23 <0.000876 <0.00138 <0.000429 <0.00168 <0.00244 <0.00110 <0.00825 <0.00165 <0.00872 <0.00825 <0.00910 3.35 67.1 35.4 12 0.962 J 0.0349 J <0.899
B-6@10 ft 10 04/04/23 <0.00116 <0.00182 <0.000570 <0.00224 <0.00323 <0.00145 <0.00393 <0.00218 <0.00910 <0.00907 <0.00950 1.26 J 81.9 44.3 16.1 0.604 J <0.0264 <0.938
B-7@3 ft 3 04/04/23 <0.000935J3 <0.00147 J3 <0.000458 J <0.00179 J3 <0.00260 J3 <0.00117 J3 <0.0316 J3 <0.00176 J3 <0.00916 <0.00913 <0.00956 6.08 34.9 78.1 18.5 1.29 J 0.116 <0.944
B-7@7 ft 7 04/04/23 <0.000679 <0.00107 <0.000333 <0.00130 <0.00189 <0.000850 <0.00230 <0.00128 <0.00761 <0.00759 <0.00794 1.05 J 100 48.3 4.01 0.403 J <0.0221 <0.784
B-8@3 ft 3 04/04/23 <0.000959 <0.00151 <0.000470 <0.00184 <0.00267 <0.00120 <0.00325 <0.00181 <0.00939 <0.00936 <0.00980 6.57 45 53.9 18.4 1.16 J 0.0625 <0.968
B-8@7 ft 7 04/04/23 <0.000714 <0.00112 <0.000350 <0.00137 0.00211 J <0.000893 <0.00262 0.00135 <0.00773 <0.00770 <0.00806 2.16 86.2 88.7 12.8 0.685 J <0.0224 <0.797
B-9@3 ft 3 04/04/23 <0.000960 <0.00151 <0.000470 <0.00184 0.00345 J <0.00120 <0.00325 <0.00181 <0.00925 <0.00922 <0.00966 1.72 34.6 39.8 15.2 0.604 J <0.0268 <0.954
B-9@7 ft 7 04/04/23 <0.000854 <0.00134 <0.000419 <0.00164 <0.00238 <0.00107 <0.00290 <0.00161 <0.00810 <0.00808 <0.00845 0.828 J 117 50.2 3.43 0.325 J <0.0235 <0.835
0.01 0.41 1.5 0.0063 8.3 0.021 12 9.9 1.2 0.12 440 5.8 580 360,000 NE 270 NE 3.8
1.2 13 1200 17 990 0.87 63 120 1.1 0.11 360 0.68 3100 23,000 400 400 4.7 0.31
Notes:Concentrations reported in mg/kg (mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram)
ft = feet below ground surface Bold denotes concentrations above the laboratory Method Detection Limits (MDLs).
VOC, SVOC, Metals, Mercury, and Hexavalent Chromium goals pursuant to NCDEQ Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2023 Concentration exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG
NE: Not Established Concentration exceeds the Residential Health-Based PSRG
J: Reported value is an estimate
J3: The associated batch QC was outside the established quality control range for precision.
O1: The analyte failed the method required serial dilution test and/or subsequent post-spike criteria. These failures indicate matrix interference.
P1: RPD value not applicable for sample concentrations less than 5 times the reporting limit.
Ch
r
o
m
i
u
m
Ba
r
i
u
m
Tr
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
Le
a
d
Be
n
z
o
(
a
)
p
y
r
e
n
e
Py
r
e
n
e
Analytical Method
Contaminant of Concern →
Cis
-
1
,
2
-
D
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
e
n
e
Te
t
r
a
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
Me
r
c
u
r
y

Se
l
e
n
i
u
m
Ar
s
e
n
i
c
Be
n
z
o
(
b
)
f
l
u
o
r
a
n
t
h
e
n
e
He
x
a
v
a
l
e
n
t

C
h
r
o
m
i
u
m

Protection of Groundwater PSRG
Residential Health Based PSRG
Metals By Method 6020BSVOCs by Method 8270C
Be
n
z
e
n
e
St
y
r
e
n
e
To
l
u
e
n
e
1,2
,
4
-
T
r
i
m
e
t
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
VOCs by Method 8260D
To
t
a
l

X
y
l
e
n
e
s
TABLE 2
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Carpet Warehouse
923 N. Liberty Street
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
Terracon Project No. 75227127
Mercury
by 7470A
3500Cr
C-2011
We
l
l
I.
D
.
Da
t
e

C
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d

(m
m
/
d
d
/
y
y
y
y
)
MW-1 4/12/2023 <0.0941 <0.157 <0.125 <0.111 <0.0819 0.434 J <0.105 <0.137 <0.105 <0.478 <0.0993 4.98 <0.278 <0.322 0.226 J 0.170 J <0.174 <0.199 <0.130 <0.120 <0.0381 <0.130 <0.0644 <0.102 <0.143 <0.159 <0.107 0.639 <4.40 <2.99 317 8.75 J <3.00 T8
MW-2 4/12/2023 <0.0941 <0.157 <0.125 <0.111 <0.0819 <0.126 <0.105 <0.137 <0.105 <0.478 <0.0993 <0.300 <0.278 <0.322 <0.104 <0.104 <0.174 <0.199 <0.130 <0.120 <0.0381 <0.130 <0.0644 <0.102 <0.143 <0.159 <0.107 <0.100 <4.40 3.13 J 47.9 3.96 J <3.00
MW-3 4/12/2023 <0.0941 <0.157 <0.125 <0.111 <0.0819 <0.126 <0.105 <0.137 <0.105 <0.478 <0.0993 <0.300 <0.278 <0.322 <0.104 <0.104 <0.174 0.234 J 0.139 J 0.153 J 0.105 J 0.176 J 0.101 J 0.233 J <0.143 <0.159 0.221 J 0.122 J 12.5 <2.99 86.9 <1.40 <3.00
MW-4 4/12/2023 <0.0941 <0.157 <0.125 <0.111 <0.0819 <0.126 <0.105 <0.137 <0.105 <0.478 <0.0993 0.432 J <0.278 <0.322 <0.104 <0.104 <0.174 <0.199 <0.130 <0.120 <0.0381 <0.130 <0.0644 <0.102 <0.143 <0.159 <0.107 <0.100 7.02 B J <2.99 79.1 <1.40 <3.00
MW-5 4/12/2023 65.6 0.261 J 0.234 J 0.440 J 1.23 0.210 J 0.976 J 4.66 1.49 0.492 J 1.89 2.1 0.897 J 11.5 10.0 3.73 77.6 <0.199 <0.130 <0.120 <0.0381 <0.130 <0.0644 <0.102 0.158 J 0.655 J <0.107 <0.100 <4.40 3.25 J 115 47.2 <3.00 T8
DUP-1
(MW-5)4/12/2023 49.0 0.233 J 0.168 J 0.396 J 0.978 J <0.126 0.782 J 3.17 1.07 <0.478 1.32 1.56 0.679 J 9.65 7.83 3.08 58.1 <0.199 <0.130 <0.120 <0.0381 <0.130 <0.0644 <0.102 <0.143 0.962 J <0.107 <0.100 <4.40 6.05 116 33.0 <3.00 T8
Trip Blank 4/12/2023 <0.0941 <0.157 <0.125 <0.111 <0.0819 <0.126 <0.105 <0.137 <0.105 <0.478 <0.0993 <0.300 <0.278 <0.322 <0.104 <0.104 <0.174 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1 70 70 70 0.4 70.0 70.0 600 70 100 70 0.7 600 400 NE 400 500 0.05 0.05 0.5 0.005 5 0.005 300 40 6 200 1 10 15 700 10 10
Notes:Only analytes detected above laboratory reporting limits are included in the table.Bold denotes concentrations above the Method Detection Limits (MDLs).
NE: Not Established indicates concentrations exceeding 2L Standards
NA: Not Analyzed B: The same analyte is found in the associated blank
All concentrations reported in µg/L = micrograms per liter J: Reported value is an estimate
Groundwater Standards pursuant to Title 15A NCAC 2L Groundwater Quality Standards (2L Standards) T8 - Sample(s) received past/too close to holding time expiration.
se
c
-
B
u
t
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
n-
B
u
t
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
To
l
u
e
n
e
4-
M
e
t
h
y
l
-
2
-
P
e
n
t
a
n
o
n
e

(
M
I
B
K
)
Di-
I
s
o
p
r
o
p
y
l

E
t
h
e
r
ci
s
-
1
,
2
-
D
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
e
n
e
Ch
l
o
r
o
f
o
r
m
SVOCs by 8270E
Py
r
e
n
e
Na
p
h
t
h
a
l
e
n
e
Is
o
p
h
o
r
o
n
e
Fl
u
o
r
a
n
t
h
e
n
e
Dib
e
n
z
(
a
,
h
)
a
n
t
h
r
a
c
e
n
e
Ch
r
y
s
e
n
e
Be
n
z
o
(
a
)
p
y
r
e
n
e
Be
n
z
o
(
k
)
f
l
u
o
r
a
n
t
h
e
n
e
Be
n
z
o
(
b
)
f
l
u
o
r
a
n
t
h
e
n
e
Be
n
z
o
(
a
)
a
n
t
h
r
a
c
e
n
e
Analytical Method
Contaminant of Concern
→
Me
r
c
u
r
y

Te
t
r
a
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e

(
P
C
E
)
2L Standard
VOCs by 8260D
To
t
a
l

X
y
l
e
n
e
s
1,
2
,
3
-
T
r
i
m
e
t
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
1,
2
,
4
-
T
r
i
m
e
t
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
n-
P
r
o
p
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
Is
o
p
r
o
p
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e

(
C
u
m
e
n
e
)
Et
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
1,
2
-
D
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
a
n
e
Be
n
z
e
n
e
1,
3
,
5
-
T
r
i
m
e
t
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
Le
a
d
Metals by 6020B
Ar
s
e
n
i
c
He
x
a
v
a
l
e
n
t

C
h
r
o
m
i
u
m
Ba
r
i
u
m

Ch
r
o
m
i
u
m
TABLE 3
Summary of Soil Vapor Analytical Results
Carpet Warehouse
923 N. Liberty Street
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
Terracon Project No. 75227127
SVP-1 SVP-2 SVP-3 SVP-4 SVP-5 SVP-6 SVP-7 SVP-8 SVP-9 SVP-10 SVP-11
DUP-1
(Duplicate of
SVP-11
SVP-12 SVP-13 SVP-14 SVP-15 SVP-16
5/1/2023 4/25/2023 4/25/2023 4/25/2023 4/26/2023 4/26/2023 4/26/2023 4/26/2023 4/26/2023 4/27/2023 4/27/2023 4/27/2023 4/27/2023 4/27/2023 4/27/2023 4/27/2023 4/27/2023
Method Analyte Result Result Result Result Result Result Result Result Result Result Result Result Result Result Result Result Result
PID TOTAL VOCs*18.3 9.6 2 0.2 6.4 6.8 2.8 5.7 0.7 2.3 0.6 0.7 0.5 1.2 1.2 0.7 1.4 18.3 --
ACETONE <4,600 <1,100 <21,000 260 180 200 140 220 170 150 220 140 16 J 380 36 17 J 17 J 380 NE
BENZENE 260 J <1,500 <2,900 2.4 J 3.0 J <3.6 1.6 J <3.8 <3.6 <3.4 <3.8 <3.4 <3.8 <3.5 <3.6 <3.5 <3.5 260 12
CUMENE / ISOPROPYLBENZENE <960 <2,300 <4,400 3.6 J <5.6 <5.6 <5.5 <5.8 <5.6 <5.2 <5.8 <5.2 <5.9 <5.4 <5.6 <5.4 <5.4 3.6 2800
CYCLOHEXANE 3,500 24,000 57,000 <4.0 1.2 J <3.9 <3.8 <4.1 <3.9 <3.6 <4.1 <3.7 <4.1 <3.8 <3.9 <3.8 <3.8 57,000 42,000
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 4,200 16,000 34,000 <4.6 <4.5 <4.5 <4.4 <4.7 <4.5 <4.2 <4.7 <4.2 <4.7 <4.4 <4.5 <4.3 <4.3 34,000 280
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE 550 J 530 J <3,600 <4.6 <4.5 <4.5 <4.4 <4.7 <4.5 <4.2 <4.7 <4.2 <4.8 <4.4 <4.5 <4.3 <4.3 550 280
ETHANOL <3,700 <8,700 <17,000 24 22 28 23 20 J 12 J 21 32 15 J <22 26 <21 <21 <21 32 NE
ETHYLBENZENE <850 <2,000 7,500 13 1.5 J <5.0 <4.9 <5.1 <5.0 <4.6 <5.1 <4.6 <5.1 <4.9 <5.0 <4.8 <4.8 7,500 37
4-ETHYLTOLUENE <960 <2,300 2,400 J 26 <5.6 <5.6 <5.5 <5.8 <5.6 <5.2 <5.8 <5.3 <5.8 <5.5 <5.6 <5.4 <5.4 2,400 NE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE / FREON 11 <1100 <2,600 <5,100 2.0 J <6.4 <6.4 <6.3 <6.6 <6.4 1.5 J 1.5 J 1.4 J 1.4 J 1.3 J <6.3 <6.2 <6.2 2.0 NE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE / FREON 12 <960 <2,300 <4,500 <5.8 2.3 J 2.0 J 2.1 J 1.9 J 2.4 J 2.6 J 2.5 J 2.4 J 2.4 J 2.3 J 2.0 J 2.2 J 2.0 J 2.6 700
HEPTANE 1,800 26,000 79,000 <4.8 <4.7 <4.7 <4.6 <4.8 <4.7 <4.3 <4.8 <4.4 <4.8 <4.6 <4.7 <4.5 <4.5 79,000 2,800
HEXANE 7,900 51,000 100,000 4.1 <4.0 <4.0 3.6 J <4.2 <4.0 <3.7 <4.2 <3.8 <4.2 <3.9 <4.0 <3.8 <3.8 100,000 4,900
2-BUTANONE (MEK)<2,300 <5,400 <11,000 25 27 15 12 J 26 12 J 13 21 20 <14 20 2.2 J 1.7 J <13 27 35,000
2-PROPANOL <1,900 <4,500 <8,900 16 9.8 J 7.0 J 12 11 J 5.2 J 14 12 9.8 J <12 15 6.0 J <11 <11 16 NE
PROPYLBENZENE <960 <2,300 1,500 J 6.9 <5.6 <5.6 <5.5 <5.8 <7.7 <5.2 <5.8 <5.3 <5.8 <5.5 <5.6 <5.4 <5.4 1,500 7,000
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 7,600 12,000 4,200 J 3.9 J 6.2 J 46 <7.6 <8.0 <6.1 2,000 110 100 26 57 35 110 27 12,000 280
TOLUENE 200 J <3,500 3,000 J 140 52 4.2 J 33 5.1 J <8.6 <7.9 <8.9 <8.1 <8.9 <8.3 <8.6 <8.2 <8.2 3,000 35,000
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE <1100 <2500 <4900 <6.4 <6.2 <6.2 <6.1 <6.4 <6.2 2.0 J <6.4 <5.8 <6.5 <6.0 <6.2 <6.0 <6.0 2.0 35,000
TRICHLOROETHYLENE 900 J 3,400 3,100 J <6.3 <6.2 <6.2 <6.1 <6.3 <6.2 <5.6 <6.3 <5.8 <6.3 <6.1 1.3 J 1.9 J <5.9 3,400 14
1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 360 J <2,300 4,200 J 30 2.8 J <5.6 <5.5 <5.8 <5.6 <5.2 <5.8 <5.2 <5.8 <5.5 <5.6 <5.4 <5.4 4,200 420
1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 750 J <2,300 1,800 J 12 2.2 J <5.6 <5.5 <5.8 <5.6 <5.2 <5.8 <5.3 <5.8 <5.5 <5.6 <5.4 <5.4 1,800 420
2,2,4-TRIMETHYLPENTANE 69,000 570,000 1,600,000 18 13 1.8 J 14 9.8 <5.3 <4.9 <5.5 <5.0 <5.6 <5.1 <5.3 <5.1 <5.1 1,600,000 NE
VINYL CHLORIDE 690 2,800 7,400 <3.0 <2.9 <2.9 <2.8 <3.0 <2.9 <2.7 <3.0 <2.7 <3.0 <2.8 <2.9 <2.8 <2.8 7,400 5.6
M&P-XYLENES <1700 <4,000 16,000 54 3.2 J <9.9 <9.7 <10 <9.9 <9.1 <10 <9.3 <10 2.2 J <9.9 <9.5 <9.5 16,000 700
O-XYLENE <850 <2,000 1,700 J 16 1.4 J <5.0 <4.9 <5.1 <5.0 <4.6 <5.1 <4.6 <5.2 <4.9 <5.0 <4.8 <4.8 1,700 700
Notes:
VOCs - Volatile Organic Compounds
PID - Photo Ionization Detector
Only compounds detected in one or more samples are shown in this table.
*PID Concentrations listed in parts per million (ppm)
Concentrations of analytes are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3)
Bold indicates a concentration above the laboratory Detection Limit
indicates a concentration exceeding the NCDEQ Residential Vapor Intrustion Screening Levels, updated July 2023
NE - Not Established
J - Estimated Value
TO-15
Date Collected
Sample ID Sub-Slab and
Exterior Soil
Gas Screening
Level
Maximum
Concentration
Reported

APPENDIX A

Redevelopment Plans

APPENDIX B
Grading Plan and Earthwork Exhibits
UP
FD
UP
MECH.
ELEC.
MECH.
938.00 T.O.S
938.00 T.O.S
935.50 T.O.S
938.00 T.O.S
937.00 T.O.S
936.00 T.O.S
UP
FD
UP
FD
UP
DN
6.5% SLOPE
UP
DN
2.3
%

S
L
O
P
E
UP
925.17 T.O.S
927.24 T.O.S
924.50 T.O.S
925.25 T.O.S
926.31 T.O.S
924.50 T.O.S 926.00 T.O.S
926.31 T.O.S
927.24 T.O.S
925.75 T.O.S
924.75 T.O.S
926.31 T.O.S
925.31 T.O.S
924.50
925.23
924.81 T.O.S
924.81 T.O.S
CV
CV
V
VANEV
VA
N
VVV
VVV
CV
CV
FD
FD
FD
C
V
FD
FD
FD
FD
FD
DN
FD
UP
FD
UP
MECH.
ELEC.
MECH.
938.00 T.O.S
938.00 T.O.S
935.50 T.O.S
938.00 T.O.S
937.00 T.O.S
936.00 T.O.S
UP
FD
UP
FD
UP
DN
6.5% SLOPE
UP
DN
2.3
%

S
L
O
P
E
UP
925.17 T.O.S
927.24 T.O.S
924.50 T.O.S
925.25 T.O.S
926.31 T.O.S
924.50 T.O.S 926.00 T.O.S
926.31 T.O.S
927.24 T.O.S
925.75 T.O.S
924.75 T.O.S
926.31 T.O.S
925.31 T.O.S
924.50
925.23
924.81 T.O.S
924.81 T.O.S
CV
CV
V
VANEV
VA
N
VVV
VVV
CV
CV
FD
FD
FD
C
V
FD
FD
FD
FD
FD
DN
FD
RL
RL
RL RL
RL RL
RL
SS
SS
RL
RL
RL
W
W
W
G
G
G
G
G
COMM
COMM
COMM
COMM
COMM
COMM
COMM
COMM
COMM
RL
RL
RL RL
925
925
92
0
915
920
925
930
936
935
932
931
936
935
935
935
930
925
920
920
920
922
923
925 926
923
927
928
930
932
934
935
933
936
936
924
925
926
925
926 925 924 923 922
921
920
91
9
919
920
921
922
925
926
928
930
92
9
92
7
93
1
932
933 934
934
935
937
936
935
925
925
924
930
935
93
7
93593
5
93
5
936
93
6
93
5
924
92
392
2
92
1
922
924
927
STIMMEL ASSOCIATES, P.A.
SHEET NO.:
SCALE:
JOB. NO:
SHEET TITLE:
DATE:
DRAWN:
REVISIONS:
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
SEALS:
MR. PORTER JONES
DPJ RESIDENTIAL, LLC
1539 TIPPAH PARK COURT
CHARLOTTE, NC 28205
[phone]
[e-mail]
22-118
01/18/23
WI
N
S
T
O
N

S
A
L
E
M
,

N
C
TH
E

B
Y
R
U
M

A
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
S

A
D
P
J

R
E
S
I
D
E
N
T
I
A
L

D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T

C-3.20
1"=40'
OVERALL
GRADING PLAN
RLW
0
SCALE: 1" = 40'
40 40 80 120
North
BEFORE YOU DIG!
CALL 811 N.C. ONE-CALL CENTER
IT'S THE LAW!
UNDERGROUNDUTILITYPROTECTIONACTALLCONSTRUCTIONMUSTCONFORMTOTHE
THE BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
HEREIN IS FROM SURVEY INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY:
SACKS SURVEYING & MAPPING, P.C.
3308-B EDGEFIELD RD., GREENSBORO, NC 27409(336)931-0566
STIMMEL ASSOCIATES, P.A. IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR
UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES NOT SHOWN ON PLANS.
GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE
CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL EXISTING AND
PROPOSED UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO BEGINNING
CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF TREES.
SURVEY DISCLAIMER
N. LIB
E
R
T
Y

S
T
.
N.
L
I
B
E
R
T
Y
ST
.
N.
M
A
I
N
ST
.
N.
C
H
E
S
T
N
U
T
ST
.
N.

P
A
T
T
E
R
S
O
N

AV
E
.
IV
Y

A
V
E
.
N.

R
E
S
E
A
R
C
H

P
K
W
Y
.
U.S
.

H
W
Y
.

5
2
MARTIN

L
U
T
H
E
R
KING J
r
.
,

D
R
.
N. C
H
E
S
T
N
U
T
ST.
E. 9th ST.
E. 10th ST.
E. 11th ST.
E. 10th
S
T
.
IV
Y

A
V
E
.
LIN
D
E
N

S
T
.
SCALE: NOT TO SCALEVICINITY MAP
SITE
N. LIBERT
Y

S
T
R
E
E
T
(60' PUBL
I
C

R
I
G
H
T
-
O
F
-
W
A
Y
)
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. DRIVE
(PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY VARIES)
IV
Y

A
V
E
N
U
E
(4
0
'

P
U
B
L
I
C

R
I
G
H
T
-
O
F
-
W
A
Y
)
N.
P
A
T
T
E
R
S
O
N

A
V
E
N
U
E
(P
U
B
L
I
C

R
/
W

V
A
R
I
E
S
)
DANNER, JAMES E
DB 3069 PG 3627
PIN# 6835-39-4843
TRIAD REAL ESTATE
INVESTMEMTS, LLC
DB 2325 PG 4186
PIN# 6835-39-6914
WILLARD, FRED E JR
DB 2096 PG 182
PIN# 6835-39-6966
WILLARD, FRED
EUGENE JR
DB 2084 PG 4478
PIN# 6836-30-7011
WILLARD, FRED E JR
& KAREN
DB 1700 PG 1781
PIN# 6836-30-7093
SALVAGE BUILDING
MATERIALS INC
DB 1369 PG 1007
PIN# 6835-39-9832
KQC INVESTORS LLC
DB 3693 PG 1482
PIN# 6835-49-0634
NC BAPTIST HOSPITALS INC
DB 2079 PG 1697
PIN# 6835-39-6170
CITY OF
WINSTON SALEM
DB 1920 PG 1793
PIN# 6835-39-4202
VICTORY FINANCIAL
UNION LLC
DB 2645 PG 147
PIN# 6835-39-2360
VICTORY FINANCIAL
UNION LLC
DB 2645 PG 147
PIN# 6835-39-2365
VICTORY FINANCIAL
UNION LLC
DB 2645 PG 147
PIN# 6835-39-2364
HENNEBERG, ROBERT &
LLUVIA
DB 3219 PG 1331
PIN# 6835-39-2701
FFE: 924.50
FFE: 927.24
FFE: 926.31
FF
E
:

9
2
5
.
2
5
FFE: 936.0
FFE: 935.5
FFE: 937.0
FFE: 938.0
FFE: 938.0
FFE: 938.0
FFE: 938.0

APPENDIX D

Final Grade Sampling Plan

FINAL GRADE SAMPLING
WORK PLAN

Carpet Warehouse
923 N. Liberty Street
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
NCBP #26043-22-034

March 1, 2024
Revision No.: Original Version
Terracon Project No. 75227127

Prepared for:
DPJ Residential, LLC
Charlotte, North Carolina

Prepared by:
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Greensboro, North Carolina

Terracon Consultants, Inc. 7327-G West Friendly Avenue Greensboro, NC 27410
P [phone] F [phone] terracon.com

March 1, 2024

Mr. Seth Titley
Brownfields Project Manager
Division of Waste Management – Brownfields Program
NC Department of Environmental Quality
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646

P: [phone]
E: [e-mail]

Re: Final Grade Sampling Work Plan
Carpet Warehouse
923 N. Liberty Street
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
NCBP #26043-22-034
Terracon Project No. 75227127

Dear Mr. Titley:

On behalf of DPJ Residential, LLC, the Prospective Developer (PD), Terracon Consultants, Inc.
(Terracon) is pleased to submit this Final Grade Sampling Work Plan for the above-referenced
site. Terracon has prepared this work plan based on a review of historical on-site sampling data.
The PD is seeking your approval of the work plan so that the assessment activities can be
completed, and a Brownfields Agreement can be obtained for this site.

Terracon appreciates the opportunity to present this work plan to the North Carolina Brownfields
Program (NCBP). Terracon Consultants, Inc. is licensed to practice geology in North Carolina.
The certification number of the corporation is F-0869. Should you have any questions or require
additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us at [phone].

Sincerely,
Terracon Consultants, Inc.

F. Christopher Driscoll, P.G. Laura R. Elliott, P.G.
Project Geologist Department Manager
Environmental Services

Cc: Mr. D. Porter Jones, DPJ Residential, LLC
TABLE OF CONTENTS

ii

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1
1.1 General Site Description ...................................................................................... 1
1.2 On-site and Off-Site Concerns ............................................................................. 1
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK .......................................................................................................... 3
3.0 SAMPLING METHODS ................................................................................................... 5
4.0 SAMPLE ANALYSES ..................................................................................................... 6
5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL ............................................................ 6
6.0 INVESTIGATION DERIVED WASTE MANAGEMENT ................................................... 7
7.0 FINAL GRADE SAMPLING REPORT ............................................................................. 7

Exhibits

Exhibit 1 – Topographic Map
Exhibit 2 – Site Plan with Sampling Locations

Table

Table 1 – Proposed Sampling and Analysis Plan

Appendix A

NCBP Minimum Requirements Checklist for Site Assessment Work Plans and Reports

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 1
FINAL GRADE SAMPLING WORK PLAN
CARPET WAREHOUSE
923 N. LIBERTY STREET
WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

NCBP #26043-22-034
Terracon Project No. 75227127
March 1, 2024

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 General Site Description

The site consists of eight parcels of land located in downtown Winston-Salem, Forsyth County,
North Carolina (Exhibit 1). The parcels are listed by Forsyth County as:

◼ Parcel ID No. 6835-39-4439: 951 N. Liberty Street, 0.44 acres
◼ Parcel ID No. 6835-39-5574: 923 N. Liberty Street, 1.25 acres
◼ Parcel ID No. 6835-39-7772: 0 N. Liberty Street, 0.83 acres
◼ Parcel ID No. 6835-39-7523: 331 N. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive, 0.22 acres
◼ Parcel ID No. 6835-39-7585: 347 N. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive, 0.22 acres
◼ Parcel ID No. 6835-39-8642: 0 Ivy Avenue, 0.17 acres
◼ Parcel ID No. 6835-39-8567: 916 Ivy Avenue, 0.08 acres
◼ Parcel ID No. 6835-39-8563: 0 N. Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive, 0.11 acres

The site properties comprise a total of 3.41 acres of land. The parcel at 923 N. Liberty Street is
developed with a commercial office/warehouse building that operated as a Carpet Warehouse
until April 2023. The site is bordered to the north by N. Liberty Street followed by Taylor’s
Warehouse and C&T Truck and Auto Repair, to the south by N. Martin Luther King Jr. Drive
followed by the Atrium Health Downtown Health Plaza, to the east by Ivy Avenue NE followed by
Salvage Building Materials and a vacant commercial building, and to the west by Patterson
Avenue followed by Truliant Federal Credit Union. The site configuration is shown on Exhibit 2.

The site was accepted into the North Carolina Brownfields Program (NCBP) on January 11, 2023.
The NCBP is the lead regulatory agency for this project.

1.2 On-site and Off-site Concerns

Terracon completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the property and
provided our findings, conclusions and recommendations in a report dated June 7, 2022
(Terracon Project No. 75227075). The Phase I ESA identified the following Recognized
Environmental Conditions (RECs) potentially affecting the site:
Final Grade Sampling Work Plan
Carpet Warehouse ■ Winston-Salem, NC
March 1, 2024 ■ Terracon Project No. 75227127

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 2

REC/Site Concern Description
Historical Site Use
◼ The former Vine Dry Cleaners facility was reportedly located
adjacent to or on the site, as identified in the DRYCLEANERS
database and EDR’s proprietary Historical Cleaners
database. According to the Historical Cleaners database, the
Vine Dry Cleaners operated from at least 1970 through 1979.
The exact location (on-site or off-site) is unknown.
Potentially Up-Gradient
Off-site Concerns
◼ The Salvage Building Materials facility was formerly located
approximately 50 feet north and topographically up-gradient
relative to the site and is identified in the State Hazardous
Waste Sites (SHWS) database, and the Incident
Management Database (IMD). Two gasoline USTs and one
Kerosene UST were closed by removal, leaving a waste oil
UST in the ground. A groundwater sample from a monitoring
well contained the chlorinated solvent trichloroethylene (TCE)
and the volatile organic compound chloroform at
concentrations exceeding 15A North Carolina Administrative
Code (NCAC) 2L Groundwater Quality Standards (2L
Standards). Based on the lack of documentation concerning
the source or extent of the chlorinated solvent Terracon
considers the former Salvage Materials facility to represent a
REC to the site.
◼ The 893 North Liberty Street / 747 North Chestnut Street
facility located approximately 70 feet west and topographically
cross-gradient relative to the site is identified in the U.S.
Brownfields database. Other records or reports for this facility
were not identified or made available. Based on distance and
gradient relative to the site and the lack of information
regarding the US Brownfields listing Terracon consider it to
represent a REC to the site.

Terracon subsequently completed a Brownfields Assessment at the site and provided our
findings, conclusions and recommendations in a report dated October 11, 2023 (Terracon Project
No. 75227127). The assessment included the collection of 18 soil samples and five groundwater
samples for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs),
eight Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals, and hexavalent chromium
analyses. Sixteen soil vapor samples (nine exterior and seven sub-slab) were collected and
analyzed for VOCs.
Final Grade Sampling Work Plan
Carpet Warehouse ■ Winston-Salem, NC
March 1, 2024 ■ Terracon Project No. 75227127

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 3
The assessment identified several VOCs and three SVOCs in soils reported at concentrations
above the laboratory Method Detection Limits (MDLs). Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) was detected
in four soil samples; two at concentrations exceeding the Protection of Groundwater Preliminary
Soil Remediation Goal (PSRG). Hexavalent chromium was reported in the 3-foot below ground
surface (bgs) soil sample collected from soil boring B-5 at a concentration exceeding the
Residential Health-Based PSRG. Arsenic was detected in every soil sample at concentrations
exceeding the Residential Health-Based PSRG or the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.

The groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-5 were reported to
contain PCE at concentrations exceeding the 2L Standard. The groundwater sample collected
from monitoring well MW-5 also was reported by the laboratory to have three VOCs at
concentrations above the 2L Standards. SVOC analytes were reported in the groundwater sample
collected from monitoring well MW-3 at concentrations as “J” qualified data exceeding the 2L
Standards. Arsenic was detected at a concentration above the 2L Standard in the sample from
monitoring well MW-3, and chromium was detected in one groundwater sample (MW-5) at
concentrations above the 2L Standard.

Soil vapor concentrations were elevated in vapor samples SVP-1, SVP-2, and SVP-3, which may
be evidence of a historical dry-cleaning operation on or near the site in this location. Soil vapor
samples SVP-1, SVP-2, and SVP-3 contained elevated soil vapor concentrations of several
VOCs, including vinyl chloride and trichloroethylene (TCE). Due to the elevated VOC
concentrations in these three vapor samples, the laboratory dilutions were high, and some of the
MDLs exceed the NCDEQ sub-slab and exterior soil gas screening levels (SGSLs).

The Risk Calculator indicated that, for direct contact with soil and water, the carcinogenic and
hazard index risk values were not exceeded for site residents or non-residential workers. For
vapor intrusion, the carcinogenic and hazard index risk values were exceeded for residents for
the soil gas to indoor air pathway. The hazard index, but not the carcinogenic risk, exceeded the
residential groundwater to indoor air pathway and the non-residential soil gas to indoor air
pathway. The residential hazard indices for vapor intrusion were calculated to be above 1.0.

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

Assessment activities at the site did not identify on-site sources of contamination, and the site is
not being regulated by other North Carolina environmental agencies. Therefore, it is Terracon’s
understanding that the primary concern of the NCBP is how human health could be affected
during and after redevelopment activities at the site. The purpose of the final grade sampling
activities is to ensure that areas of shallow soil that will remain exposed following construction at
the site do not contain VOCs, SVOCs, or metals at concentrations exceeding NCDEQ health-
based action levels.

Final Grade Sampling Work Plan
Carpet Warehouse ■ Winston-Salem, NC
March 1, 2024 ■ Terracon Project No. 75227127

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 4
Sample locations were selected based on the available planned exposed soil areas based on
Based on Terracon’s review of the Overall Landscape Plan prepared by Stimmel Associates and
dated January 18, 2023, the landscape plan shows a total planter area of approximately 20,840
square feet. Terracon proposes to collect a total of six final grade grab samples and six final grade
composite samples across six areas of undeveloped soil on the site (Exhibit 2). Terracon will use
the most recent IHSB Program Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of Contaminated Sites
as a protocol for the assessment activities. Terracon has included the completed NCBP Minimum
Requirement Checklist for Site Assessment Work Plans and Reports in Appendix A.

The assessment will generally consist of the following elements:

◼ Revise existing Health and Safety Plan
◼ Advance 18 soil borings (3 each in 6 general areas) with a decontaminated hand auger to
depths of 2 feet below ground surface (bgs)
◼ Collect soil samples from the 1-2 foot boring interval
◼ Screen soil samples for VOCs using a photoionization detector (PID)
◼ Collect one grab soil sample with the highest relative PID reading from the 3 borings
advanced in each area (6 grab samples total) for VOC analysis.
◼ Prepare one composite sample using equal aliquots of soil from the 3 soil samples
advanced in each area (6 composite samples total) for SVOC and metals analysis
◼ Interpret data
◼ Prepare and submit assessment report

The soil borings will be advanced in the approximate locations shown on the attached Exhibit 2.
We divided the site into 6 general areas based on the layout of the apartment buildings. The
borings are not intended to address any specific areas of concern at the site because none were
identified during the Brownfields Investigation. There are three courtyard areas with planters (one
with a pool), and planter areas located around the buildings and site perimeter. The borings will
be advanced with a decontaminated hand auger to depths of approximately 2 feet bgs. Soil
samples will be collected in the 1-2 foot soil boring interval.

Boring No. Sample Depth
FG-1a 1-2 feet Analyze one grab sample with highest PID for VOCs
Analyze one composite sample for SVOCs and
metals
FG-1b 1-2 feet
FG-1c 1-2 feet
FG-2a 1-2 feet Analyze one grab sample with highest PID for VOCs
Analyze one composite sample for SVOCs and
metals
FG-2b 1-2 feet
FG-2c 1-2 feet
FG-3a 1-2 feet Analyze one grab sample with highest PID for VOCs
FG-3b 1-2 feet
Final Grade Sampling Work Plan
Carpet Warehouse ■ Winston-Salem, NC
March 1, 2024 ■ Terracon Project No. 75227127

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 5
Boring No. Sample Depth
FG-3c 1-2 feet Analyze one composite sample for SVOCs and
metals
FG-4a 1-2 feet Analyze one grab sample with highest PID for VOCs
Analyze one composite sample for SVOCs and
metals
FG-4b 1-2 feet
FG-4c 1-2 feet
FG-5a 1-2 feet Analyze one grab sample with highest PID for VOCs
Analyze one composite sample for SVOCs and
metals
FG-5b 1-2 feet
FG-5c 1-2 feet
FG-6a 1-2 feet Analyze one grab sample with highest PID for VOCs
Analyze one composite sample for SVOCs and
metals
FG-6b 1-2 feet
FG-6c 1-2 feet

Please refer to the attached Table 1 for the proposed sampling and analysis plan. The proposed
boring locations may be modified in the field to account for utility clearance, access limitations,
and/or site conditions. The client will be notified of any significant modifications to the sampling
locations.

The hand auger will be cleaned using an Alconox® detergent wash and potable water rinse prior
to commencement of the project and after collection of each sample. The sample locations
(horizontal control only) will be documented by a North Carolina licensed surveyor.

3.0 SAMPLING METHODS

Soil sampling techniques outlined in this work plan are in general accordance with the NCDEQ,
IHSB Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of Contaminated Sites dated September 2022.
The soil samples will be inspected to document lithology, color and relative moisture content. Soil
type, relative moisture content, and other lithologic characteristics will be documented in field
notes only; boring logs will not be prepared in the field based on the shallow depth of the borings
and the presence of fill soils in the planters. Terracon will screen the soils in the field using a PID
that detects and quantifies volatile vapors. In the event that soil samples from a boring exhibit
elevated PID readings, the sample collected with the highest PID reading in each designated area
will be collected for analysis.

Soil samples will be collected at the depth intervals described in the Sampling and Analysis Plan
(Table 1). The soil samples will generally be collected in the 1- to 2-foot interval of soils present
in the selected planter areas. The soil samples will be placed into laboratory-supplied glass
containers, labeled with pertinent sample information with a permanent marker and stored in an
ice-packed cooler pending submittal to Pace Analytical Laboratories in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee, a
Final Grade Sampling Work Plan
Carpet Warehouse ■ Winston-Salem, NC
March 1, 2024 ■ Terracon Project No. 75227127

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 6
North Carolina certified laboratory. Chain of custody documentation will accompany the samples
to the laboratory.

Soil sample results will be compared to the IHSB’s Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs)
for unrestricted use and residential use. Additionally, constituent concentrations in the soils will
be evaluated using the NC Brownfields Program’s Soil Risk Calculator under Residential and
Non-Residential exposure scenarios.

4.0 SAMPLE ANALYSES

A total of 6 soil samples will be analyzed by Pace Analytical laboratory located in Mount Juliet,
Tennessee (NC Laboratory Accreditation No. Env375). Six grab samples, one from each of 6
designated site areas, will be analyzed for VOCs using USEPA Method 8260. Six composite soil
samples, one from each of 6 designated site areas, will be analyzed for SVOCs using USEPA
Method 8270, eight Resource and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals using USEPA Method 6010,
mercury using USEPA Method 7471 and hexavalent chromium using USEPA Method 7199.
Level II Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) data packages will be provided from the
laboratory for all analyses.

5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL

Laboratory samples will be analyzed in conjunction with standard laboratory QA/QC procedures
including appropriate blanks, duplicates, continuing calibration standards, surrogate standards,
and matrix spiking standards in accordance with approved methodologies to monitor both
instrument and analyst performance. The laboratory will include estimated concentrations for
compounds that are detected at levels above the laboratory detection but below the laboratory
reporting limit (J flags). Laboratory results not meeting reporting limits with be identified within
the QA/QC discussion of the report.

Based on the number of samples to be collected, field duplicate samples will not be collected or
analyzed, and a trip blank will not be analyzed as part of the project.

A level II QA/QC data package will be requested from the analytical laboratory for the soil
samples. Terracon will require that laboratory reporting limits (RL) and Method Detection Limits
(MDL) be below applicable standards and screening levels, to the extent feasible. Terracon will
also request “J-Flag” values to be included in the laboratory analytical reports.

6.0 INVESTIGATION DERIVED WASTE MANAGEMENT

Following the completion of sampling activities, each soil boring will be properly abandoned in
general accordance with applicable USEPA Region 4 SESD Guidance Document dated January
Final Grade Sampling Work Plan
Carpet Warehouse ■ Winston-Salem, NC
March 1, 2024 ■ Terracon Project No. 75227127

Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 7
2018. Based on the boring depths of 2 feet bgs and the presence of fill soils, the borings will be
abandoned using the soil cuttings removed during the hand auger boring process. Soil cuttings
generated during the assessment activities that exhibit PID readings in excess of 50 parts per
million (referenced to an isobutylene standard) will be stored in 55-gallon drums pending proper
characterization and disposal.

7.0 FINAL GRADE SAMPLING REPORT

Upon completion of the assessment activities and receipt of the laboratory analytical results, a
Final Grade Sampling Report will be prepared that will include the following items:

▪ Documentation of field activities;
▪ Site plan showing pertinent site features;
▪ Analytical laboratory results;
▪ Data evaluation and presentation of findings including comparison of data to applicable
regulatory standards; and
▪ Recommendations concerning further assessment, if necessary

The report will be completed in a format suitable for submittal to the NCBP. Work associated with
this scope of services will be performed under the direction of, and the final report will be signed
and sealed by a Professional Geologist registered in the State of North Carolina.

EXHIBITS

TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Carpet Warehouse
923 N. Liberty Street Winston-Salem, NC
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IMAGE COURTESY OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
7327 W Friendly Ave Ste G
Greensboro, NC 27410-6253
75227127Project Manager:
Drawn by:
Checked by:
Approved by:
JWR
EW
EW
1”=2,000’
Warehouse
April 2023
Project No.
Scale:
File Name:
Date: 1
LRE Exhibit
APPROXIMATE
SITE BOUNDARY

SITE DIAGRAM
Carpet Warehouse
923 N. Liberty Street
Winston-Salem, NC
7327 W Friendly Ave Ste G
Greensboro, NC 27410-6253
DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
75227127
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY
MICROSOFT BING MAPS
FCD
LRE
LRE
AS SHOWN
CW
Feb 2024
Scale:
2
Exhibit Project Manager:
Drawn by:
Checked by:
Approved by:
Project No.
File Name:
Date:
LRE
Overall Landscape plan
provided by Stimmel and
dated January 18, 2023.

TABLE

BROWNFIELDS INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN
Carpet Warehouse ■ Winston-Salem, NC
Table 1 – Proposed Sampling and Analysis Plan
CARPET WAREHOUSE
923 N. LIBERTY STREET
WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NCBP #26043-22-034
Terracon Project No. 75227127

Notes:
1 Type and Designation: FG = Final Grade soil sample
2 Analytical Methods:
VOCs = volatile organic compounds by EPA 8260 (EPA TO-15 for soil gas)
SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds by EPA 8270
RCRA Metals = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Metals by EPA 6010/7470/7471
Hexavalent Chrome by EPA 7196A
Type and Designation1 Advancem
ent
Method
Estimated
Depth (ft)
No. of Soil
Analytical
Samples
Soil Analytical2 Groundwater
Sample? (y/n)
Groundwater Sampling
Method
Groundwater
Analytical4
Soil Gas Sample? (y/n) Soil Gas Analytical4 QC Samples
FG-1a
Grab
Hand
Auger 1 – 2 2 VOCs n n/a n/a n n/a Y (1 Duplicate)
FG-1a, FG-1b, FG-1c
Composite
Hand
Auger 1 – 2 2
SVOCs
RCRA 8 Metals
Mercury
Hexavalent Cr
n n/a n/a n n/a Y (1 Duplicate)
FG-2a
Grab
Hand
Auger 1 – 2 1 VOCs n n/a n/a n n/a n
FG-2a, FG-2b, FG-2c
Composite
Hand
Auger 1 – 2 1
SVOCs
RCRA 8 Metals
Mercury
Hexavalent Cr
n n/a n/a n n/a n
FG-3a
Grab
Hand
Auger 1 – 2 1 VOCs n n/a n/a n n/a n
FG-3a, FG-3b, FG-3c
Composite
Hand
Auger 1 – 2 1
SVOCs
RCRA 8 Metals
Mercury
Hexavalent Cr
n n/a n/a n n/a n
FG-4a
Grab
Hand
Auger 1 – 2 1 VOCs n n/a n/a n n/a n
FG-4a, FG-4b, FG-4c
Composite
Hand
Auger 1 – 2 1
SVOCs
RCRA 8 Metals
Mercury
Hexavalent Cr
n n/a n/a n n/a n
FG-5a
Grab
Hand
Auger 1 – 2 1 VOCs n n/a n/a n n/a n
FG-5a, FG-5b, FG-5c
Composite
Hand
Auger 1 – 2 1
SVOCs
RCRA 8 Metals
Mercury
Hexavalent Cr
n n/a n/a n n/a n
FG-6a
Grab
Hand
Auger 1 – 2 1 VOCs n n/a n/a n n/a n
FG-6a, FG-6b, FG-6c
Composite
Hand
Auger 1 – 2 1
SVOCs
RCRA 8 Metals
Mercury
Hexavalent Cr
n n/a n/a n n/a n

APPENDIX A
Work Plan and Report Checklist
Version 2 February 2022

Minimum Requirements Checklist
for
Site Assessment
Work Plans and Reports
NCDEQ Brownfields Program – February 2022
Instructional Page
All references to Prospective Developers includes follow-on owners who may be conducting
work in accordance with the Brownfields Property Management Unit.
To increase predictability and most efficiently assess Brownfields Properties and the redevelopment
timing requirements of Prospective Developers or follow-on owners, the Brownfields Program has
standardized the format for Site Assessments. This format has been generated in the form of a
checklist to allow for ease in submission by the prospective developer’s consultant and for the
Brownfields Program’s completeness review. This checklist outlines the minimum requirements and
submittal format under the Brownfields Program for Assessment Requirements and Reporting. All
Assessment Work Plans and Reporting submissions to the Brownfields Program must include this
completed checklist in the outlined format.
These requirements allow DEQ to reduce review time for the Assessment Work Plan and Report
and increase process predictability for prospective developers. This checklist will also provide
reliable data for risk-based decisions and further expedite the project timeline. Any divergence from
these requirements will lengthen the process of assessing risks on the site, may necessitate
reprioritization of a project manager’s queue towards projects that meet these requirements.
Therefore, delaying production of the brownfields agreement and/or environmental management
plan. Any alterations to the checklist on a site- specific basis must be reviewed and approved by the
Program prior to implementation. However, in order to respect the schedule of all projects in house
and keep the program’s entire project pipeline moving, we strongly recommend against seeking
changes to the checklist.
Based on a review of environmental and risk data from our project inventory, please note
there are some new points of emphasis that are included herein:
1. For ALL residential reuses; sub-slab vapor assessment (full list EPA TO-15) is required,
regardless if existing structures will be removed. If no structures or slabs exist on the
Brownfields Property, exterior soil gas assessment is required within all proposed structure
footprints.
2. ALL properties require groundwater data (VOCs, SVOCs and RCRA Metals) from a
minimum of three sample locations, depth to groundwater and a resulting potentiometric
map.
3. Soil shall be assessed based on areas of concern and redevelopment plans and across the
depth interval of the cut/grading.

Work Plan and Report Checklist
Version 2 February 2022

Environmental Site Assessment
Work Plan Checklist
Reviewed and checked by (Name ): _______________________________________
Title Page
The title page should include the following information. Letter style reports are acceptable, as long as this
information is somewhere on the first page.
X Title of Work Plan
X Brownfields Project Name (not the development name)
X Brownfields Project Number
X Date (updated with each revision)
X Revision Number
X Firm PE/PG License Number
X Individual PE/PG seal & signature
X Contact information for Developer, Consultant, and Project Manager

Section 1 – Introduction
X Provide the site location, address, and acreage.
X Provide a BRIEF summary of the history of the property and its history in the program. For example:
reiterate RECs from a Phase I ESA, indicate if the scope of work was negotiated during a Data Gap
Meeting, etc.
X Briefly list and describe the data gaps the assessment is attempting to fill
X Indicate if the assessment data is for the use of any other DEQ programs in addition to the
Brownfields Program (i.e. the site is a regulated UST, IHSB, etc. property)
Section 2 – Scope of Work
X Provide a general description of proposed scope of work covered in this plan (i.e. 2 new monitoring
wells, six groundwater samples, 5 exterior soil gas sampling points and 6 soil borings)
X Discuss samples to be collected by media and source area/location. Generally, the reasoning for the
sample locations selected.
X Describe depths of samples to be collected (Reference Table 1) or how that decision will be made
in the field, if needed.
X State for what each sample will be analyzed (briefly). Reference Table 1.
- For all residential reuses, sub slab vapor is required, if no slabs exist, exterior soil gas is required
within all proposed footprints.
Section 3 – Sampling Methodology
X Reference the guidance documents you intend to use. IHSB, EPA SESD, VI Guidance, Well
Construction Rules (NCAC 2C). Note deviations or methodology planned that is not covered by
such guidance (e.g., multi-increment sampling, passive air samplers, mobile labs, Hapsite,
simultaneous indoor/outdoor radon, high-volume subslab vapor testing, PFAS sampling).
X Describe what will be installed (soil boring, temporary well, permanent well, sub slab vapor, exterior
soil gas, etc.). Include construction details.
X Discuss installation methodology (Hand Auger, DPT, etc.)
X Discuss sample collection procedures. Include the following, at a minimum:
• Equipment to be used
• Purging methods and volumes
Work Plan and Report Checklist
Version 2 February 2022

• Stabilization parameters for groundwater sampling
• Field screening methods
• Leak check procedures for sub-slab vapor and exterior soil gas samples (Note this is
required)
• Discuss how and when vacuum readings will be collected (for summa cans)
X Discuss sample point abandonment

Section 4 – Laboratory Analyses
X Discuss the proposed analyses (include method number, preparation method, if there are concerns
with short hold times, etc).
X Discuss any proposed limitations on the contaminants of concern, if any, and the reason for such
limitation (sufficient previous data, indoor air interferences, etc).
X Discuss laboratory certifications. Please note, NC does not certify labs for air samples. Please
specify what certification the proposed air lab holds.

X Indicate that the Reporting Limits/Method Detection Limits will meet applicable screening criteria
(to the extent feasible). Include Reporting of J-Flags to meet criteria.
X Indicate what Level QA/QC will be reported by the laboratory. Level II QA/QC is typically
acceptable.

Section 5 – QA/QC
X Specify the duplicate sample frequency. Minimum requirement: 1 duplicate per 20 samples, per
media, per method.
Discuss Trip Blank. 1 Trip Blank per cooler/shipment of groundwater VOC analyses is required.
X Discuss how the lab will have sufficient sample volume for MS/MSD analyses.
X Discuss chain of custody and shipping.

Section 6 – Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Management
X Discuss what IDW will be generated and how it is proposed to be managed. Management
recommendations should be in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T.1503 and 15A NCAC 02H. 0106.
Generally, if the Brownfields Property has not previously been assessed, then all IDW must be
containerized and characterized prior to management. Previous assessment data that indicate no
Hazardous Waste (listed or characteristic) is likely to be encountered in the area of proposed
assessment will be required before thin spreading of IDW on-site is permitted.
Section 7 – Reporting
This section should discuss the components of the assessment report which will be prepared as a result of
the above sample collection. At a minimum, the report shall include:
X Reporting/summary of site work conducted for all sections outlined above in this checklist;
X Summary of findings and possible recommendations;
X All applicable tables and figures outlined below with the addition of:
Tables for tabulated analytical data per media sampled and analyzed, compared against
applicable screening levels, sample depths and depth to groundwater;
Figure depicting actual sample locations collected, with each media depicted in the legend,
graphic scale and north arrow; and
Groundwater potentiometric map, with graphic scale and north arrow.
- Boring logs for all soil borings, newly constructed monitoring wells, and exterior soil gas locations
- Well construction and abandonment records, if applicable
Work Plan and Report Checklist
Version 2 February 2022

X Firm PE/PG License Number
X Individual PE/PG seal & signature
Work Plan and Report Checklist
Version 2 February 2022

Attachments
X Table 1 – Proposed Sample Locations and Analyses on a Summary Table that includes:
Sample ID
Sample Objective
Proposed Depth(s)
Analytical Method(s)
QA/QC Samples
Background Samples

X Figure 1 – Site Location Map
Site location on a topographic map base
Graphic scale and north arrow

X Figure 2 – Site Map should include the following
Buildings
Historical sample locations
RECs or other areas of concern
Proposed sample locations
Sample identification labels
Background samples
QA/QC samples
Graphic scale and north arrow
High quality aerial suggested as the base map

Figure 3 – Site Potentiometric Map
- Buildings
-Groundwater sample identification labels
-Graphic scale and north arrow

Figure 4 – Site Plume Maps (groundwater, soil vapor, etc.)

Figure 5 – Proposed Development (if available)
Overlay of historical and proposed sample locations
Graphic scale and north arrow

Appendix – Summary of Historical Analytical Data (if needed) – to include tables and figures only.

APPENDIX E

NCBP Diagram for Temporary Containment of Impacted or
Potentially Impacted Soil

27
EMP Version 3, March 2023