NCD024900987_20220301_Holcomb Creosote Company_ISCO Pilot Test Report DRAFT

DRAFT
IN SITU CHEMICAL OXIDATION PILOT TEST REPORT

HOLCOMB CREOSOTE COMPANY SITE
YADKINVILLE, YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

Prepared for:

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, GA 30303-3104

Design and Engineering Services (DES) Contract 68HE0318D0006
Task Order 68HE0419F0104

Prepared by:

HydroGeoLogic, Inc.
DES CLIN 2
HGL Region 4 Office
1745 Phoenix Boulevard, Suite 200
Atlanta, GA 30349

April 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page

U.S. EPA Region 4
i
1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1-1
1.1 SITE OVERVIEW ............................................................................................... 1-1
1.1.1 Site History ............................................................................................ 1-1
1.1.2 Site Geology .......................................................................................... 1-2
1.1.3 Site Hydrogeology ................................................................................. 1-3
1.2 CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN ................................................................... 1-4
2.0 ISCO PILOT TEST OBJECTIVES AND APPROACH ................................................. 2-1
2.1 ISCO PILOT TEST OBJECTIVES ..................................................................... 2-1
2.2 SUMMARY OF ISCO PILOT TEST APPROACH ........................................... 2-1
3.0 ISCO PILOT TEST IMPLEMENTATION ..................................................................... 3-1
3.1 ISCO PILOT TEST INJECTIONS ...................................................................... 3-1
3.1.1 Injection Overview and Schedule .......................................................... 3-1
3.1.2 Performance Monitoring and Injection Well Installation ...................... 3-1
3.1.3 Mobilization and Site Setup .................................................................. 3-3
3.1.4 Injection Equipment .............................................................................. 3-3
3.1.5 Injection Solution Batching ................................................................... 3-4
3.1.6 Injection Process Summary ................................................................... 3-4
3.1.7 Injection Implementation Details and Results ....................................... 3-6
3.1.8 Deviations from the Work Plan During Injection ................................. 3-8
3.1.9 PERFORMANCE MONITORING SAMPLING ................................. 3-9
3.2 INVESTIGATION-DERIVED WASTE ........................................................... 3-10
4.0 BASELINE AND PERFORMANCE MONITORING RESULTS ................................. 4-1
4.1 FIELD PARAMETERS ....................................................................................... 4-1
4.2 SVOCS ................................................................................................................. 4-2
4.3 METALS.............................................................................................................. 4-5
4.4 PERMANGANATE, HYDROGEN PEROXIDE, AND IRON FIELD
TESTS .................................................................................................................. 4-7
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................... 5-1
5.1 INJECTION PROCESS AND PARAMETERS .................................................. 5-1
5.2 GROUNDWATER CHEMISTRY ...................................................................... 5-1
5.3 CONTAMINANT REDUCTION EFFICACY ................................................... 5-1
5.4 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................... 5-2
6.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 6-1

LIST OF APPENDICES

U.S. EPA Region 4
ii
Appendix A Well Install and Sampling Field Forms
Appendix B ISCO Injection Forms and Logs
Appendix C Injection Photolog
Appendix D Soil Boring Logs
Appendix E Well Construction Logs
Appendix F Laboratory Analytical Reports

LIST OF TABLES

Table 3.1 Injection Volume Summary
Table 3.2 Daylighting Summary
Table 3.3 Depth-to-Water During ISCO Injections
Table 3.4 Injection Pressures and Flow Rates Summary
Table 3.5 Geochemical Parameters During ISCO Injections
Table 3.6 ISCO Pilot Test Sampling and Analysis Plan

Table 4.1 Performance Monitoring Sampling Results: Field Parameters, Field Tests, and
SVOCs
Table 4.2 Performance Monitoring Sampling Results: Metals

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1.1 Site Location
Figure 1.2 Site Facility Plan
Figure 1.3A February 2020 Saprolite Groundwater Elevation Contours
Figure 1.3B February 2020 Partially Weathered Rock Groundwater Elevation Contours
Figure 1.3C March 2020 Saprolite Groundwater Elevation Contours
Figure 1.3D March 2020 Partially Weathered Rock Groundwater Elevation Contours

Figure 3.1 ISCO Pilot Test Injection Locations and Monitoring Well Layout

Figure 4.1 Performance Monitoring Target Compounds Results - MW-57
Figure 4.2 Performance Monitoring Target Compounds Results - MW-58
Figure 4.3 Performance Monitoring Target Compounds Results - MW-2
Figure 4.4 Performance Monitoring Target Compounds Results - MW-6
Figure 4.5 Comparison of Week 2 Concentration Decrease to Pore Volume Displacement
Figure 4.6 Comparison of Week 2 to Month 1 Concentration Decrease to Pore Volume
Displacement
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

U.S. EPA Region 4
iii
% percent
µg/L micrograms per liter

BaP benzo(a)pyrene
bgs below ground surface

CoC chain of custody
COC contaminant of concern

DO dissolved oxygen
DPT direct-push technology

EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

ft feet or foot

gal gallon
Geosyntec Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C.
GEX Geologic Exploration, Inc.
gpm gallons per minute

HCC Holcomb Creosote Company
HGL HydroGeoLogic, Inc.

IDW investigation-derived waste
ISCO in situ chemical oxidation

lb pound

MFR modified Fenton’s reagent
mg/L milligrams per liter
msl mean sea level
mV millivolts
MW monitoring well

NTU nephelometric turbidity unit

ORP oxidation-reduction potential

PAH polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
PID photoionization detector
ppm parts per million
psi per square inch
PVC polyvinyl chloride
PWR partially weathered rock

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (Continued)

U.S. EPA Region 4
iv
Redox Tech Redox Tech, LLC
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RD Remedial Design
RI Remedial Investigation
ROD Record of Decision
ROI radius of influence

SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan
Site Holcomb Creosote Company Superfund Site
SVOC semivolatile organic compound

TAL target analyte list
TEQ toxic equivalence

U.S. EPA Region 4
1-1
IN SITU CHEMICAL OXIDATION PILOT TEST REPORT
HOLCOMB CREOSOTE COMPANY SITE
YADKINVILLE, YADKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

1.0 INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) retained HydroGeoLogic, Inc. (HGL) to
conduct Remedial Design (RD) activities for the Holcomb Creosote Company (HCC) Superfund
Site (Site), in Yadkinville, North Carolina (Figures 1.1 and 1.2). The Site (EPA identification
number NCD024900987) is located at 5016 U.S. Highway 601 just north of the town of
Yadkinville, in Yadkin County, North Carolina. EPA published a Record of Decision (ROD) for
the Site in August 2018 to address soil and groundwater contamination (EPA, 2018). The selected
groundwater remedy in the ROD includes treating highly contaminated portions of the
groundwater plume using in situ chemical oxidation (ISCO).
An ISCO pilot test was performed between July 2021 (monitoring and injection well installation)
and December 2021 to support the groundwater RD addressing naphthalene and other semivolatile
organic compound (SVOC) contamination in the saprolite and partially weathered rock (PWR)
aquifer zone. The ISCO pilot test was performed in accordance with Addendum to the Final Work
Plan - In Situ Chemical Oxidation Treatability Study and In Situ Enhanced Bioremediation Pilot
Test (Work Plan) submitted to EPA in July 2021 (HGL, 2021a).
This report describes the procedures followed and results obtained during the ISCO pilot test to
(i) evaluate the in situ oxidation of site contaminants of concern (COCs) via the delivery of two
ISCO reagents (modified Fenton’s reagent [MFR] and sodium permanganate) into the subsurface;
and (ii) assess field injection parameters including radius of influence (ROI) and injection pressure
and flow rate for the saprolite and PWR aquifer zones. HGL and team subcontractor Geosyntec
Consultants of NC, P.C. (Geosyntec) have prepared this report under EPA Design and Engineering
Services contract 68HE0318D0006, Task Order 68HE0419F0104.
1.1 SITE OVERVIEW
1.1.1 Site History
Information in this subsection is based on information provided in the ROD (EPA, 2018) and the
Remedial Investigation (RI) Report (Versar, 2017a) and Feasibility Study Report (Versar, 2017b).
A Site facility plan is provided in Figure 1.2.
From 1951 to 2009, HCC operated a wood treating facility on the Site, manufacturing
pressure-treated posts and lumber using creosote coal tar solutions. During facility operations,
wood products were placed into a pressurized treatment vessel and heated with steam to open the
pores of the wood and remove sap and resin. After an allotted time, the vessel was vented to
decrease the interior pressure, and a vacuum was drawn to remove moisture. Following application
of the vacuum, creosote was forced into the pores of the wood. The vapor stream from the
treatment vessel was passed through a condenser, where the water/creosote mixture was liquefied.
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
1-2
After treatment, condensate from the condenser and from depressurization of the treatment vessel
was pumped to a concrete-lined settling tank (i.e., the concrete storage pit). This liquid was
pumped from the concrete storage pit to a steel settling tank, where the solids settled to the bottom.
The liquids were then pumped to an unlined surface impoundment for storage and evaporation.
After treatment, the wood was transported to a drip pad immediately south of the treatment vessel,
where it was allowed to drip dry. In the early 1990s, HCC reportedly ceased using the drip pad;
instead, the wood was allowed to dry inside the treatment vessel and was then moved to a transfer
area located at the end of the treatment vessel. The transfer area measured approximately 25 feet
(ft) by 100 ft and consisted of soil and gravel over a plastic liner and covered by a metal roof. One
55-gallon (gal) sump was located at each end of the treatment vessel to contain any spills that
occurred when the treatment vessel doors were opened. Spilled creosote was pumped back into the
treatment vessel. A catch basin was also located at the end of the treatment vessel where the treated
lumber was removed. The treatment vessel was cleaned from time to time due to buildup of
creosote and solids. This sludge-like waste was removed and placed in 55-gal containers that were
stored in the drum storage area, until they were shipped off Site for disposal.
The surface impoundment, located at the southeastern corner of the facility, reportedly was 30 ft
by 60 ft by 6 ft deep (approximately 80,000-gal capacity) and was used by HCC to store liquid
wastes until 1983. The surface impoundment contained waste classified as EPA hazardous waste
K001 defined as: “bottom sediment sludge from the treatment of wastewaters from wood
preserving processes that use creosote and/or pentachlorophenol.”
Before 1981, HCC constructed a 0.587-acre landfarm on the east side of an unnamed tributary of
North Deep Creek across from the operations area. Residual liquids from the surface impoundment
were pumped to the landfarm, where an irrigation system was used to spray liquids onto the land
surface. The landfarm was utilized when weather conditions did not allow for evaporation in the
surface impoundment and when the surface impoundment was near its storage capacity. From
1982 to 1983, the landfarm was used as a remediation unit for disposal of K001-contaminated
sludge and wastewater removed during closure of the surface impoundment.
HCC ceased wood treating operations on the property in February 2009 and subsequently sold its
assets at auction later that year. In October 2011, the Site was referred to the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act program to address known and
potentially hazardous waste contamination. The transfer from former regulation under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program was required because all remediation
activities at HCC had ceased due to lack of funds.
1.1.2 Site Geology
Lithologies identified during previous soil boring and monitoring well (MW) installation at the
Site consist of non-native/remolded fill, alluvium, saprolite, PWR, and metamorphic bedrock.
These lithologic features are discussed below.

• Non-native/remolded fill. Fill material in the form of a thin (approximately 1 to 2 ft thick)
orange-brown silty clay was deposited on the Site following an EPA-lead removal of
contaminated soils during 2011. This surface “cap” covers the Site from Highway 601 to
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
1-3
the west to within approximately 10 ft of an unnamed tributary of North Deep Creek to the
east. A similar clay covers the hilltop near the closed RCRA landfarm to the east of the
unnamed tributary. Additional remolded soils are present near the process buildings, likely
remnants of Site construction and grading.
• Alluvium. Alluvial sediments/soil are present flanking the stream channel of the unnamed
tributary of North Deep Creek. Alluvial materials consist of graded beds of clay, silt,
quartz, lithic and mica sands/gravels, and entrained organic/vegetative matter. The
historical stream channel appears to have been broader than its present course, extending
west toward the facility buildings. Reduction in the stream channel breadth is the result of
backfill with remolded soil. Such fill materials cover the western margin of the unnamed
tributary channel to a depth of approximately 5 ft.
• Saprolite. Saprolitic soil at the Site was derived from in-place chemical weathering of the
native metamorphic bedrock. Site-specific geology descriptions from the RI and Feasibility
Study reports describe the saprolite as a predominantly clay matrix with abundant
vermiculite and other silt to sand-sized micaceous phases and angular quartzite sand lenses.
Soil descriptions from the pre-RD soil borings indicate higher than expected content of silt,
sand, and gravel in the saprolite. Pre-RD saprolite soil samples submitted for geotechnical
laboratory analysis were classified as either silty sand or sandy silt.
• PWR. The saprolite transitions to an underlying weathered gneiss unit, identified in
previous Site reports as PWR. Based on review of previous RI boring logs and soil
descriptions from the pre-RD soil borings, the transition from saprolite to PWR occurs at
a relatively consistent elevation of approximately 835 to 840 ft mean sea level (msl) over
most of the western portion of the Site, generally west of the unnamed tributary that
transects the Site from north to south. The upper portion of the PWR is highly weathered
gneiss that consists of moderately dense, fined to coarse grained silty sand that is gray,
white, and black in color. The PWR becomes increasingly dense with depth until it
transitions to the underlying competent metamorphic bedrock.
• Metamorphic bedrock. Bedrock beneath the Site consists of biotite and amphibolite
gneisses with varying concentrations of purple garnet. Foliation dips from near horizontal
to approximately 20 degrees, with localized foliation discontinuities at small scale folds
and faults. Only a limited number of previous Site borings have been advanced into the
bedrock. Review of the previous boring logs indicates that the top of competent rock is
generally found at elevations of approximately 820 to 825 ft msl.
1.1.3 Site Hydrogeology
Hydrogeologic units at the Site include the surficial aquifer and the gneiss bedrock aquifer. The
surficial aquifer is comprised of the saprolite zone and the PWR zone. The saprolite zone is
composed of the highly weathered portion of surficial aquifer closest to the land surface. The PWR
zone contains weathered bedrock and saprolite and sits immediately above the bedrock. The
surficial aquifer is from 10 to 40 ft thick at the former operations area. Water level measurements
collected during the RI and the pre-RD investigations indicate that groundwater flow direction
within the saprolite zone is generally toward the southeast. The flow direction is slightly more to
the east-southeast in the PWR, and more eastward in the bedrock. The groundwater elevation
contours in the saprolite and PWR from the February 2020 and March 2020 pre-RD investigations
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
1-4
are presented in Figures 1.3A to 1.3D. The vertical groundwater gradient is downward from the
saprolite zone to the PWR zone to the bedrock aquifer in the higher surface elevations of the Site,
which act as a recharge area. The distribution of groundwater contamination from the source area
suggests that the unnamed tributary that transects the Site from north to south is acting as a
discharge area and barrier to contaminant movement.
1.2 CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN
Based on the groundwater sampling results obtained during the RI and the human health risk
assessment, the COCs presented below were identified for groundwater (based on assumed use as
a residential drinking water source) and for soil (based on protection of the underlying
groundwater). COCs based on direct contact to soil (ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact)
were not designated because there is no unacceptable risk for direct exposure to the soil for a future
industrial worker. Preliminary remediation goals are provided in parenthesis for the COCs
presented below.
Groundwater

• Cobalt (9 micrograms per liter [µg/L])
• Iron (20,256 µg/L)
• Manganese (694 µg/L)
• 1,1-Biphenyl (400 µg/L)
• 2-Methylnapthalene (30 µg/L)
• Acenaphthene (1,736 µg/L)
• Dibenzofuran (28 µg/L)
• Naphthalene (6 µg/L)
• Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) toxicity equivalent (TEQ) 0.005 µg/L
• Ethyl benzene (600 µg/L)
Soil

• Naphthalene (180 micrograms per kilogram)

The ISCO pilot test targeted SVOCs in groundwater, specifically 1,1-biphenyl,
2-methylnapthalene, acenaphthene, dibenzofuran, and naphthalene.
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
2-1
2.0 ISCO PILOT TEST OBJECTIVES AND APPROACH
This section presents the ISCO pilot test objectives and a summary of the pilot test approach.
2.1 ISCO PILOT TEST OBJECTIVES
The primary objective of the ISCO pilot test is to assess the effectiveness of the application of
permanganate and MFR to degrade naphthalene and other SVOCs in groundwater, and to assess
injection design parameters for the full-scale design of the selected ISCO remedy in the saprolite
and PWR zones.
The specific objectives of the ISCO pilot test are to:
• Assess the effectiveness of sequential or standalone application of permanganate and MFR
to oxidize naphthalene and other SVOCs (i.e., reduce their concentrations);
o Sequential application of MFR and permanganate was tested in the PWR zone.
o Standalone application of permanganate was tested in the saprolite zone.
• Assess oxidant longevity in both the saprolite and PWR zones;
• Assess the injection parameters such as injection flow rate, injection pressure, and injection
ROI; and
• Evaluate potential changes in geochemistry (e.g., pH and oxidation-reduction potential
[ORP], dissolved oxygen [DO], dissolved metals) from the amendment applications.
2.2 SUMMARY OF ISCO PILOT TEST APPROACH
Details of the ISCO pilot test design are provided in the Work Plan Addendum (HGL, 2021a) and
summarized below.
The ISCO pilot test area was located in the former surface impoundment in the vicinity of MWs
MW-2 and MW-6 in the PWR zone and saprolite zone, respectively.
The PWR zone design included the sequential injection of MFR (a combination of a hydrogen
peroxide solution and a chelated iron catalyst solution) and sodium permanganate into the
subsurface. MFR injections included two rounds of field injections, approximately two weeks
apart. During MFR injections multiple injection fluids were injected including potable water (to
establish flow and push material into the subsurface), diluted hydrogen peroxide, and a chelated
iron catalyst solution. Two weeks following the second round of MFR injection, diluted sodium
permanganate was injected into the subsurface.
Two oxidants were selected for the PWR zone because treatability testing results indicated that
each oxidant was effective at reducing concentrations of specific SVOCs. Permanganate treatment
was generally successful at reducing concentrations of naphthalene, acenaphthene,
2-methynapthalene, and BaP TEQ, but was not effective for 1,1-biphenyl and dibenzofuran
degradation. MFR treatment was the most effective for 1,1-biphenyl and dibenzofuran degradation
but less effective than permanganate treatment in reducing BaP TEQ.
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
2-2
The saprolite zone design included the injection of sodium permanganate into the subsurface
during a single mobilization.
RemOx®-L, which is manufactured by Carus Group, Inc., was chosen as the sodium permanganate
amendment. RemOx-L contains 40 percent (%) by weight sodium permanganate. A 30% by weight
hydrogen peroxide solution was selected for the MFR design.
The target intervals for the pilot test were the 10-ft injection intervals in the saturated saprolite
zone above the PWR zone and saturated PWR zone. Direct-push technology (DPT) was used to
deliver the oxidant into the saprolite zone at one location. Four injection wells were installed to
deliver the oxidants into the PWR zone.
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
3-1
3.0 ISCO PILOT TEST IMPLEMENTATION
This section presents details of the ISCO pilot test implementation, including performance
monitoring and injection well installation, ISCO field injections, and performance monitoring
sampling.
3.1 ISCO PILOT TEST INJECTIONS
This section provides details of the implementation of the ISCO pilot test injections. Field forms
documenting performance MW and injection well installation are provided in Appendix A. Field
forms documenting the ISCO injections (including Daily Field Reports, batching and injection
logs, and other monitoring logs) are provided in Appendix B. A photographic record of the
injections is provided in Appendix C.
3.1.1 Injection Overview and Schedule
ISCO pilot test injections were completed across four separate mobilizations. During these
mobilizations performance monitoring and injection wells were installed, MFR and sodium
permanganate were sequentially injected into the PWR zone, and sodium permanganate was
injected into the saprolite zone. The general timeline for pilot test-related activities and a short
summary is provided below. Details of these events are provided in the following subsections.
• Performance Monitoring and Injection Well Installation: 26 to 30 July 2021
o HGL and subcontractors Geosyntec and Geologic Exploration, Inc. (GEX) installed
two MWs and four permanent injection wells.
• MFR Injections – Mobilization 1: 18 and 19 August 2021
o HGL and subcontractors Geosyntec and Redox Tech, LLC (Redox Tech) injected the
first dose of MFR into the PWR zone using permanent injection wells.
• MFR Injections – Mobilization 2: 2 September 2021
o HGL and subcontractors Geosyntec and Redox Tech injected the second dose of MFR
into the PWR zone using permanent injection wells.
• Sodium Permanganate Injections: 15 to 17 September 2021
o HGL and subcontractors Geosyntec and GEX completed sodium permanganate
injections in the PWR zone and saprolite zone. They injected sodium permanganate
into the PWR zone using permanent injections wells and into the saprolite zone using
a temporary DPT injection point.
3.1.2 Performance Monitoring and Injection Well Installation
HGL and subcontractor GEX installed the ISCO pilot test performance MWs (MW-57 and
MW-58) and the ISCO pilot test injection wells (INJ-1 through INJ-4) from 26 to 30 July 2021
using sonic drilling techniques. The well locations are shown on Figure 3.1.
During well installation, continuous soil cores were collected from each performance MW and
injection well location. The soil cores were logged for color and soil classification, and screened
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
3-2
with a photoionization detector (PID) at regular intervals. Soil boring logs are provided in
Appendix D. Transition from saprolite to PWR was gradual at each boring, and appeared to start
at approximately 19 ft below ground surface (bgs). Elevated PID readings (greater than 20 parts
per million [ppm]) were detected from 22 ft bgs to 26 ft bgs (MW-57) and 18 ft bgs to 27 ft bgs
(MW-58), with maximum PID readings of 78.2 ppm (24 ft bgs at MW-57) and 64.8 ppm (21 ft
bgs at MW-58). Compared to the MW soil cores, injection well soil cores exhibited more elevated
PID readings at shallower intervals; PID readings greater than 100 ppm were measured near
ground surface at injection wells INJ-1 and INJ-2.
The MWs in the PWR zone were constructed of 2-inch Schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) with
10 ft, 0.01-inch slotted screens installed from 23 to 33 ft bgs (at MW MW-57, bentonite chips were
placed from 38 ft bgs up to the bottom of the screen at 33 ft bgs). A 20/30 sand filter pack was
placed from the bottom of the screen to 1 ft above the top of screen. Each monitoring and injection
well was constructed with a screen interval located approximately 2 ft below the bottom of the
saprolite aquifer unit to allow for COC monitoring within the PWR layer. Monitoring Well
Construction Forms are provided in Appendix E and the Monitoring Well Development Logs are
provided in Appendix A.
Each MW was constructed with a 3.0-ft bentonite seal above the filter pack, and grout was placed
in the annular space between the borehole and the performance MW casing from the top of the
bentonite seal to ground surface. Each MW was completed with a 2-ft by 2-ft concrete pad and an
above-grade finish. MW casings extend approximately 3 ft above land surface and are protected
with a locking casing.
Each performance MW was developed 2 days following installation using a submersible pump
and new tubing. During development, field parameters were collected, including temperature,
specific conductivity, DO, pH, and turbidity. Approximately 40 gal and 55 gal of groundwater
were purged from wells MW-57 and MW-58, respectively. Turbidity was measured to be 58
nephelometric turbidity units (NTUs) and 21 NTUs upon completion (MW-57 and MW-58,
respectively).
The injection wells were constructed of 2-inch Schedule 40 PVC with 10-ft, 0.01-inch slotted
screens installed from 23 to 33 ft bgs. A 20/30 sand filter pack was placed from the bottom of the
screen to 1 ft above the top of screen, except at INJ-4 (no filter pack was placed above the screen).
Each injection well was constructed with a screen interval located approximately 1 to 2 ft below
the bottom of the saprolite aquifer unit to allow for oxidant injection within the PWR layer.
Injection Well Construction Forms are provided in Appendix E.
Each injection well was constructed with a 3.0 to 7.0-ft bentonite seal above the filter pack, and
grout was placed in the annular space between the borehole and the performance MW casing from
the top of the bentonite seal to ground surface. Each MW was left uncompleted until after the
injections were completed. Following completion of injection, each injection well was completed
with a 2-ft by 2-ft concrete pad and an above-grade finish from 27 to 30 September 2021. Injection
well casings extend approximately 3 ft above land surface and are protected with a locking casing.
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
3-3
3.1.3 Mobilization and Site Setup
HGL and subcontractors Geosyntec and Redox Tech mobilized to the Site on 18 August 2021 to
set up for the MFR injections. Site setup included staging injection and MFR batching equipment
and materials and filling a potable water pillow tank that was staged at the entrance of the site. The
equipment and materials were left on-Site in between MFR injection events.
HGL and subcontractors Geosyntec and GEX mobilized to the Site on 15 September 2021 to set
up for the sodium permanganate injections. Site setup included staging injection and sodium
permanganate batching equipment and materials.
3.1.4 Injection Equipment
Equipment used to inject the MFR solution into injection wells included:
• One 250-gal tote for MFR solution mixing;
• One 4,000-gal pillow tank;
• One diaphragm pump to inject the MFR solution;
o An air compressor was used to operate the diaphragm pump;
• One injection manifold (during the second MFR injection event only), which allowed for
injections to occur at two locations simultaneously, that included the following
components:
o Recordall® Model 25 flow meter to measure the total volume injected;
o Assured Automation WM-PT Series paddle wheel flow meter to measure injection
rates and volumes into one of the two injection locations;
o GPI TM Series flow meter to measure injection rates and volumes into one of the two
injection locations;
o One pressure gauge for each manifold outlet; and
o One ball valve for each manifold outlet flow control;
• Hose, connections, and fittings to connect the injection equipment to the injection wells.
Equipment used to inject the diluted sodium permanganate solution into the injection wells and
DPT tooling included:
• One DPT rig (Geoprobe 7822DT) to advance the temporary injection tooling into the
saprolite zone;
• Two 500-gal sodium permanganate solution mixing tanks;
• One potable water storage tank;
• Diaphragm pumps to transfer RemOx-L to batching tanks and inject the diluted sodium
permanganate solution;
o An air compressor was used to operate the diaphragm pump;
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
3-4
• One injection manifold, which allowed for injections to occur at two locations
simultaneously, that included the following components:
o Assured Automation WM-PT Series paddle wheel flow meters to measure injection
rates and volumes into each injection location;
o One pressure gauge for each manifold outlet; and
o One ball valve for each manifold outlet flow control;
• Injection well wellheads with bleed valves;
• 2-ft DPT injection tooling;
• Hose, connections, and fittings to connect the injection equipment to the injection wells
and DPT injection head; and
• Secondary containment for injection material, mixing equipment, and injection equipment.
3.1.5 Injection Solution Batching
The injection solution batching process was similar for the MFR and sodium permanganate
injections. Prior to injection each day, and as needed throughout the day, the injection solutions
were generated by mixing the liquid oxidant with potable water. For MFR injections, sodium
citrate was also added to each batch as a stabilizer. Across the three mobilizations, multiple mixing
ratios were used based on field conditions, and they are summarized below:
• MFR: Diluted hydrogen peroxide solutions were batched at approximately 8.4%, 4.2%,
and 0.5% by weight using a 34% by weight hydrogen peroxide solution and potable water.
o These relied on mixing ratios (34% hydrogen peroxide : potable water) of
approximately 1 : 3.4, 1 : 8, and 1: 68, respectively.
• Sodium permanganate: Diluted sodium permanganate solutions were batched at
approximately 8.6% and 12.6% by weight sodium permanganate.
o These relied on 500-gal batches with mixing ratios (40% sodium permanganate :
potable water) of 83 : 417 and 126 : 374, respectively.
A ferrous sulfate catalyst was also batched as part of the MFR injections. The catalyst was batched
such that 1 pound (lb) of ferrous sulfate was added to 119 gal of potable water.
MFR liquid measurements were made based on visual observations of levels in the 250-gal totes
used for mixing. Scales were used to measure the amount of sodium citrate and ferrous sulfate.
Sodium permanganate liquid measurements were made using in-line flow meters on the diaphragm
pumps used to transfer RemOx-L and potable water to the 500-gal mixing tanks.
Notes documenting that batching process are provided in Appendix B.
3.1.6 Injection Process Summary
During the ISCO pilot study, two amendment delivery methods, permanent injection wells for the
PWR zone and DPT for the saprolite zone, were used,. The general injection process was the same
for both delivery methods. Low-pressure and low-flow injection techniques were used to inject the
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
3-5
MFR and sodium permanganate solutions into either the four permanent injection wells (INJ-1
through INJ-4) or the temporary DPT injection point (DPT-13). A diaphragm pump or gravity
feeding was used to transfer the MFR or sodium permanganate solutions from the batching area to
the active injection location(s) and into the subsurface. Injection pressures and flow rates were
monitored and adjusted to maintain a sustainable injection rate. During the second MFR
mobilization and sodium permanganate injections, a manifold was used to inject into up to two
locations simultaneously.
During injections, the following measurements were collected (details are provided in the
subsequent section).
• The injection flow rate, injection pressures (at the injection location), and total injection
volumes were recorded at regular intervals.
• Depth-to-water measurements were taken at regular intervals from MWs in and near the
injection area before, during, and immediately following injections each day to evaluate
potential groundwater mounding caused by the injectate. These MWs were MW-2, MW-3,
MW-6, MW-7, MW-57, and/or MW-58.
• Field parameters (pH, temperature, specific conductivity, ORP, and DO) were measured at
MWs in and near the injection area at the beginning and end of each injection day (prior to
injections starting and after injections stopped). Measurements were collected by
deploying a water quality meter directly into each MW. This meter was decontaminated
between wells. Monitoring wells MW-2, MW-3, MW-7, MW-57, and/or MW-58 were
used for monitoring field parameters.
During injection of both MFR and sodium permanganate, daylighting (surfacing of injectate to the
ground surface through a preferential pathway) occurred across the injection area, which resulted
in field adjustments. The field adjustments are reflected in the description of the injection processes
below. Further details of the injections are provided in the subsequent section.
For the PWR zone injections, diluted hydrogen peroxide and sodium permanganate solutions were
injected into each injection well until the target injection volume was achieved or daylighting
occurred. When daylighting occurred, injections were stopped and either restarted at a later time
or moved to another injection well. The overall injection order for the PWR zone injections is
outlined below:
• An 8.4% (by weight) hydrogen peroxide solution was injected into the active injection well
using a diaphragm pump, which resulted in daylighting at most locations.
• A 4.2% (by weight) hydrogen peroxide solution was injected into the active injection well
using a diaphragm pump, which resulted in daylighting at most locations.
• A 0.5% (by weight) hydrogen peroxide solution was injected into active injection wells (up
to two at a time) using gravity feed methods and/or a diaphragm pump, which resulted in
daylighting at most locations.
• An 8.6% (by weight) sodium permanganate solution was injected into active injection wells
(up to two at a time) using gravity feed and/or a diaphragm pump, which resulted in
daylighting at one location (INJ-3).
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
3-6
The overall injection process for the saprolite zone occurred via DPT as outlined below:
• DPT injection tooling was advanced from land surface to the estimated top of the PWR
aquifer zone (i.e., refusal).
• Injection of a 12.6% (by weight) sodium permanganate solution was completed in four 2-
foot intervals or lifts extending from the top of the PWR aquifer zone to 8 ft above the top
of the PWR zone. Due to daylighting and damage to the injection tool, the planned fifth
injection interval was not completed.
• Injection continued in each injection interval until the target injection volume was reached
or daylighting occurred. Once the target injection volume for that interval had been
emplaced into the subsurface, the injection tooling was raised 2 ft and injection began
again, unless subsurface conditions did not allow the target injection volume to be injected
(discussed in the subsequent section).
• The target injection volume of diluted sodium permanganate solution per interval was
131 gal.
At the end of the saprolite injection, the injection borehole was abandoned using tremie grouting
methods from the bottom up. All injection tooling used at an injection location was decontaminated
with a heated pressure washer prior to leaving the Site.
3.1.7 Injection Implementation Details and Results
Table 3.1 summarizes the oxidant quantities injected during the ISCO pilot test. Due to daylighting
(discussed further below), the injection volumes deviated from the design. Field modifications
were made with the goal of injecting the maximum volume of oxidant possible and injecting the
maximum total volume of injection solutions. During the MFR injections, only one injection well
(INJ-2) was able to receive chase water and catalyst (ferrous sulfate); all other injection wells
received only a diluted hydrogen peroxide solution. During sodium permanganate injections, each
injection well received diluted sodium permanganate; however, only INJ-1 and INJ-2 received the
design volume. In total:
• 81 gal of 34% hydrogen peroxide was injected into the injection wells; and
o Design amount: 248 gal of 30% hydrogen peroxide
• 350 gal of RemOx-L was injected into the subsurface (266.5 gal into injection wells and
88.5 gal into DPT-13).
o Design amount: 525 gal
Daylighting occurred during each injection mobilization and with both injection techniques
(injection wells and DPT). A summary of when and where daylighting occurred, including what
oxidant solution was being injected and how much had been injected before daylighting was
observed, is provided in Table 3.2. Notable observations made during the injection are provided
below.
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
3-7
• During the MFR injection, except injection well INJ-2, all injection wells experienced
daylighting. No discernable difference was observed from the lithology of INJ-02 to the
remaining injection wells that would explain the daylighting.
• Injection of the 8.4% (by weight) hydrogen peroxide solution resulted in strong subsurface
reactions that caused daylighting to occur relatively quickly (less than 40 gal of injection)
at INJ-1, INJ-3, and INJ-4. Furthermore, the injection caused the groundwater table to
increase within the injection area and side-gradient to it near MW MW-3. The depth-to-
water measurements are provided in Table 3.3.
o Routine depth-to-water measurements were halted during the 8.4% (by weight)
hydrogen peroxide injections to avoid removing the compression well caps for health
and safety purposes. Groundwater mounding was measured during all injections, but
to a lesser extent when more dilute hydrogen peroxide solutions or dilute sodium
permanganate solutions were injected.
o There was no notable groundwater mounding measured downgradient of the injection
area at MW MW-7.
• Reducing the concentration of hydrogen peroxide did not decrease the occurrence of
daylighting at injection locations INJ-1, INJ-3, and INJ-4.
• Daylighting from the injection wells decreased during sodium permanganate injections, as
INJ-3 was the only well associated with daylighting of sodium permanganate.
• Daylighting in the saprolite zone was observed at the shallowest injection interval of 17 to
19 ft bgs. Injecting at an offset location was not attempted as the injection tool was
damaged and could not be reused, and no other injection tools were on hand.
The range of injection pressures and flow rates measured during the ISCO injections are
summarized in Table 3.4 (no measurements were collected during the first MFR injection event
because flow meters and pressure gauges were not provided by Redox Tech). Since injections used
diaphragm pumps and gravity feeding to emplace oxidant solutions into the subsurface, a wide
range of injection pressures were measured. Generally, injection flow rates were maintained below
3 gallons per minute (gpm) at both injection wells and DPT injection location DPT-13. Injection
pressures were often measured to be 0 lb per square inch (psi) because gravity feeding was used.
When the diaphragm pump was used for injections, pressures were generally between 20 and
35 psi.
Geochemical parameters were measured directly from MWs within and near the ISCO injection
area using a water quality meter, and the results are presented on Table 3.5. Observations from the
geochemical parameter monitoring are provided below.
• Following MFR injections, elevated DO concentrations were measured within the injection
area at MWs MW-57 and MW-58. Two weeks after the second MFR injection (15
September 2021), DO had decreased at MW-57 but remained elevated at MW-58.
Increases in DO were not measured at MWs downgradient (MW-2 and MW-7) or side-
gradient (MW-3) of the injection area.
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
3-8
• In general, an increase in ORP was measured within the injection area at MWs MW-57
and MW-58 following the first round of MFR injections. A similar increase was also
measured at downgradient MW MW-2.
o The increase of ORP measured at MW-2 suggests that injections had an impact on
groundwater geochemistry immediately downgradient of the injection area, as MW-2
was approximately 8 ft from injection well INJ-4.
o All locations exhibited a large decrease in ORP during the last measurement collected
on 17 September 2021, after the sodium permanganate injections were completed. It is
suspected that the water quality meter malfunctioned based on the previous results and
other geochemical readings collected at that time.
During the injection event, other methods were used to assess the distribution of oxidant in the
subsurface. These methods are discussed below.
• Field test kits for hydrogen peroxide were procured and used during the first MFR injection
event; however, the field test kit was unable to be used accurately, likely due to interference
from compounds naturally present in Site groundwater. During pre-injection testing, the
field kit measured elevated concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (up to 30 milligrams per
liter [mg/L]). The field kit was tested against store-bought purified water and hydrogen
peroxide concentrations were measured to be 0.6 mg/L. Based on these results, the
hydrogen peroxide field test kits were not used.
• Visual observations were used to assess the presence of sodium permanganate, which is
purple. Bailers were placed down well or water color was evaluated during geochemical
parameter measurements. No visual evidence of sodium permanganate was observed
during the injections.
Based on the geochemical parameters measured during injections, it appears as if the target ROI
of 6 ft was achieved with the MFR injections. The lack of visual observation of sodium
permanganate suggests that the actual ROI for this oxidant was less than 6 ft.
3.1.8 Deviations from the Work Plan During Injection
Notable deviations from the Work Plan Addendum (HGL, 2021a) during the ISCO injection pilot
test are described below.
• Baseline samples were analyzed only for iron and manganese due to an error in the
Scribe/chain of custody (CoC). By the time the error was discovered, the samples had been
removed by the laboratory for disposal.
• Mercury was not included in the target analyte list (TAL) metals analyses due to errors in
the Scribe/CoCs. The EPA regional laboratory requires that mercury be explicitly
requested as part of TAL metals analysis (i.e., TAL metals plus mercury). By the time the
error was discovered, the samples were outside the 28-day hold time.
• Prior to drilling, the monitoring and injection well locations were located from Site features
using a measuring tape. The final injection locations (Figure 3.1) recorded by a global
positioning system were slightly different than the proposed locations in the Work Plan
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
3-9
Addendum (HGL, 2021a). The shift resulted in the four injection wells, MW-2, MW-57,
and MW-58 being located approximately 5 to 6 ft north-northwest of the proposed
locations in the Work Plan Addendum. This shift did not result in a significant change to
how existing Site MWs could be used to monitor the ISCO pilot test.
• Due to daylighting, the concentration of hydrogen peroxide was decreased from the design
to reduce the reactivity in the subsurface. This change resulted in less total hydrogen
peroxide being injected into the PWR zone across two mobilizations than designed. In
addition, the iron catalyst for MFR was applied only at INJ-2.
• The total volume of injected RemOx-L was less than the design volume based on site
conditions, field observations, and subsurface responses.
• Due to daylighting, the total oxidant solution volumes injected into the permanent injection
wells and temporary DPT injection point were different than designed. Table 3.1 details
how much diluted oxidant solution was injected into each injection location. For
comparison, Table 3.1 includes the design injection volumes from the Work Plan
Addendum (HGL, 2021a).
• The injection interval for DPT-13 was adjusted from the planned interval of 15 to 25 ft bgs.
No sodium permanganate solution was injected at 23 to 25 ft bgs because flow could not
be established, and from 15 to 17 ft bgs due to daylighting.
3.1.9 Performance Monitoring Sampling
HGL completed ISCO pilot test performance monitoring by collecting groundwater samples from
performance MWs MW-2, MW-6, MW-57, and MW-58 on the dates outlined below. The
sampling schedule relative to the timing of the oxidant injections is provided in parenthesis.
• 28 July 2021 (Baseline; prior to MFR or permanganate injection);
• 14 September 2021 (Week 2: approximately 2 weeks post-MFR injection and before
sodium permanganate injection);
• 13 and 14 October 2021 (Month 1: approximately 1 month post-sodium permanganate
injection); and
• 7 December 2021 (Month 3: approximately 3 months post-sodium permanganate
injection).
Monitoring well sampling was conducted in general accordance with the approved Sampling and
Analysis Plan (SAP) (HGL, 2020) and the groundwater samples were analyzed for performance
monitoring parameters presented in the ISCO pilot test monitoring plan provided in Table 3.6 and
described below.
• SVOCs: Naphthalene and other SVOCs were monitored to evaluate the efficacy of ISCO
in reducing contaminant concentrations.
• Dissolved metals: Dissolved metals were monitored to evaluate potential metals
mobilization following ISCO implementation.
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
3-10
• Permanganate: Permanganate was measured using a field test kit to evaluate distribution
and permanganate consumption rates. Following the permanganate injections, the field test
kits were only used when visual evidence (a purple or pink color in groundwater) was not
observed.
• Hydrogen peroxide: Hydrogen peroxide was measured using a field test kit to evaluate the
concentration of residual hydrogen peroxide in the subsurface. As described in Section
3.1.7, comparison of results for hydrogen peroxide solutions diluted with potable water and
Site groundwater indicated that the Site groundwater contained chemicals that interfered
with the test kit results. For this reason, hydrogen peroxide was not measured in the field
after the first MFR injection.
• Iron: Iron was measured using a field test kit during the baseline sampling and the Week 2
sampling following the MFR injections.
• Field parameters: General field parameters were collected using a calibrated water quality
meter during groundwater sampling to evaluate the geochemical characteristics of the
aquifer following the ISCO injections.
Groundwater samples were collected using low-flow groundwater sampling techniques and
submitted to the EPA Region 4 laboratory under CoC protocol. Field screening was conducted for
select compounds (permanganate, hydrogen peroxide, and iron) using field test kits at the
frequency indicated in Table 3.6.
3.2 INVESTIGATION-DERIVED WASTE
Investigation-derived waste (IDW) generated during the implementation of the ISCO pilot test
included soil cuttings from well installation, MW development/purge water, decontamination
fluids, personal protective equipment, and empty oxidant containers. IDW generated during field
activities (e.g., decontamination water, purge water) was placed in 55-gal drums. For solid IDW,
effort was made to reduce that amount of liquid being placed into the solid IDW drums. IDW was
managed, characterized, and disposed of in accordance with the approved Waste Management
Plan, which was included in the SAP (HGL, 2020). Injection subcontractors (Redox Tech and
GEX) managed the empty oxidant containers.

HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
4-1
4.0 BASELINE AND PERFORMANCE MONITORING RESULTS
This section presents the performance monitoring results for the ISCO pilot test, from baseline
monitoring through the Month 3 performance monitoring event (December 2021) at the four
performance MWs (MW-2 [downgradient PWR], MW-6 [downgradient saprolite], MW-57
[within treatment zone], and MW-58 [within treatment zone]). Analytical results are provided on
Table 4.1 (SVOCs) and Table 4.2 (metals). Laboratory analytical reports are provided in Appendix
F.
4.1 FIELD PARAMETERS
Field parameters measured during groundwater sampling are presented on Table 4.1. Select field
parameters collected during the performance monitoring sampling events were used to evaluate
the geochemical characteristics of the aquifers following the ISCO injections. Of particular interest
were DO or ORP, which could be impacted by the injection of MFR (DO, ORP) and sodium
permanganate (ORP). Results for these parameters are summarized below, by MW.
• MW-57 (within treatment zone): DO increased from 0.2 mg/L (baseline) to 17.8 mg/L 2
weeks after MFR injection (September 2021). DO remained elevated 1 month (October
2021) and 3 months (December 2021) after sodium permanganate injections (22.1 mg/L
and 6.7 mg/L respectively). ORP increased from a baseline of 85.1 millivolts (mV) to 153.8
mV 2 weeks after MFR injection. ORP increased further 1 month after sodium
permanganate injections (811.0 mV) and remained elevated 3 months after sodium
permanganate injections (761.1 mV).
o These results indicate that MFR and sodium permanganate injections impacted this
MW.
o DO concentrations measured above saturation in October 2021 indicate that oxygen
generated from hydrogen peroxide injection persisted in the subsurface for at least two
months.
• MW-58 (within treatment zone): DO increased from 0.4 mg/L (baseline) to 17.4 mg/L 2
weeks after MFR injection (September 2021). DO remained elevated 1 month (October
2021) after sodium permanganate injections (7.6 mg/L) and returned to near baseline
conditions 3 months after sodium permanganate injections (December 2021). ORP
increased from negative 147.3 mV (baseline) to 84.4 mV 2 weeks after MFR injection.
ORP continued increasing 1 month and 3 months after sodium permanganate injections
(494.1 mV and 637.8 mV, respectively).
o These results indicate that MFR and sodium permanganate injections impacted this
MW.
o DO concentrations measured above saturation in September 2021, but not October
2021, indicate that oxygen generated from hydrogen peroxide injection persisted in the
subsurface for at least 4 weeks after MFR injections.
• MW-2 (downgradient PWR): DO increased from 1.2 mg/L (baseline) to 4.1 mg/L 2 weeks
after MFR injection (September 2021), then returned to near baseline concentrations
following sodium permanganate injections. ORP fluctuated between baseline (12.2 mV),
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
4-2
2 weeks following MFR injections (56.6 mV), and 1 month following sodium
permanganate injections (3.0 mV). ORP increased by two orders of magnitude 3 months
following sodium permanganate injections (806.3 mV).
o These results indicate that MFR injections and sodium permanganate injections had
some impact on the downgradient area. There was a notable lag in impact following
sodium permanganate injections, as ORP increases were not measured during the
Month 1 monitoring event. This suggests that sodium permanganate migrated into the
vicinity of MW MW-2 area 3 months post-injection.
• MW-6 (downgradient saprolite): DO generally remained low during the performance
monitoring period; the maximum DO measurement was 1.4 mg/L during the Month 2
performance monitoring event. ORP increased from 39.8 mV (baseline) to 545.0 mV
(Month 1) before decreasing back to near baseline conditions (29.0 mV).
o These results indicate that MFR injections in the PWR zone may have had a minor
impact on the downgradient saprolite zone, as DO did not increase but ORP increased
two weeks following MFR injections.
o A continued, and more pronounced ORP increase one month following the sodium
permanganate indicates that sodium permanganate injections in the saprolite zone may
have impacted the downgradient area around MW MW-6.
Based on the field parameter results, MFR and sodium permanganate were distributed within and
downgradient of the treatment zones.
4.2 SVOCs
SVOCs were monitored to evaluate the efficacy of ISCO in reducing contaminant concentrations.
Table 4.1 summarizes the SVOC concentrations. The semivolatile groundwater COCs detected
during the pilot study are acenaphthene, naphthalene, 1,1-biphenyl, 2-methylnaphthalene, and
dibenzofuran. The polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that comprise the BaP TEQ were
not detected. Graphs presenting a comparison of acenaphthene, naphthalene, 1,1-biphenyl, 2-
methylnaphthalene, and dibenzofuran concentrations measured at performance MWs over time,
from baseline through Month 3, are provide on Figure 4.1 (MW-57), Figure 4.26 (MW-58), Figure
4.3 (MW-2), and Figure 4.4 (MW-6). In addition, ORP measurements were also depicted in these
figures to present SVOC concentration changes with respect to changes in ORP. A summary of
results, organized by MW, is provided below.
• MW-57 (within the treatment zone):
o The naphthalene concentration decreased from 11,000 µg/L during the baseline event
to 8,800 µg/L at Week 2 (20% decrease) and 5,800 µg/L at Month 1 (47% decrease),
and then rebounded at Month 3 (7,500 µg/L). The lowest detection of 5,800 µg/L
during Month 1 coincided with the maximum ORP measurement.
o The acenaphthene concentration decreased from 690 µg/L during the baseline event to
510 µg/L after the MFR injection (26% decrease) and then continued to decrease to 27
µg/L during Month 3 (96% decrease).
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
4-3
o Similar to naphthalene, the 2-methylnaphthalene concentration decreased between the
baseline event (980 µg/L) and Week 2 (830 µg/L; 15% decrease) and Month 1 (450
µg/L; 54% decrease), and then increased by Month 3 (730 µg/L).
o The dibenzofuran concentration decreased from a baseline concentration of 360 µg/L
to 320 µg/L at Week 2 (11% decrease) and then to 260 µg/L at Month 1 (28% decrease),
then increased slightly to 290 µg/L at Month 3.
o The 1,1-biphenyl concentration fluctuated between 130 µg/L and 140 µg/L between
the baseline and Month 1 events then increased to 180 µg/L in Month 3.
• MW-58 (within the treatment zone):
o The naphthalene concentration decreased from a baseline value of 6,600 µg/L to 5,200
µg/L at Week 2 (21% decrease) and 3,000 µg/L at Month 1 (55% decrease), then
increased to 7,600 µg/L in Month 3. During the Month 3 sampling event, the ORP was
still elevated and sodium permanganate was observed in the purge water.
o The acenaphthene concentration decreased from 450 µg/L during the baseline event to
410 µg/L at Week 2 (9% decrease) and 9.5 µg/L at Month 1 (98% decrease), then
increased to 460 µg/L during Month 3.
o Similar to naphthalene, the 2-methylnaphthalene concentration decreased from a
baseline detection of 730 µg/L to 480 µg/L at Week 2 (34% decrease) and 230 µg/L at
Month 1 (68% decrease). The concentration increased to 1,000 µg/L during Month 3.
o The dibenzofuran concentration decreased slightly (8%) after the baseline event and
then increased from 230 µg/L at Week 2 to 380 µg/L at Month 3.
o The 1,1-biphenyl concentration decreased from 100 µg/L during the baseline event to
80 µg/L at Week 2 (20% decrease) then increased to 140 µg/L by Month 3.
• MW-2 (downgradient of the treatment zone in PWR):
o The naphthalene concentration was stable between the baseline (5,100 µg/L) and Week
2 (5,000 µg/L) sampling events. Following sodium permanganate injection, the
naphthalene concentration decreased to 2,800 µg/L in Month 1 (45% decrease) and
then increased to 3,800 µg/L in Month 3.
o The acenaphthene concentration was 470 µg/L during both the baseline and Week 2
sampling events, then increased to 590 µg/L at Month 1. Between Month 1 and Month
3, the acenaphthene concentration decreased to 520 µg/L.
o The 2-methylnaphthalene concentration decreased slightly from a baseline value of 810
µg/L to 760 µg/L at Week 2 (6% decrease) then increased to 1,000 µg/L at Month 1
and 1,100 µg/L at Month 3.
o Between the baseline event and Week 2, the dibenzofuran concentration decreased
slightly from 260 µg/L to 240 µg/L (8% decrease). Between Week 2 and Month 3, the
dibenzofuran concentration increased to 290 µg/L.
o The 1,1-biphenyl concentration decreased from a baseline detection of 110 µg/L to 84
µg/L at Week 2 (24% decrease), then increased to 120 µg/L at Month 3.
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
4-4
• MW-6 (downgradient of the treatment zone in saprolite):
o The naphthalene concentration decreased slightly from the baseline event (14,000
µg/L) to Week 2 (13,000 µg/L; 7% decrease), and then decreased further to 9,200 µg/L
at Month 1 (34% decrease) following the injection of sodium permanganate. By Month
3, the naphthalene concentration had rebounded to its baseline level (14,000 µg/L). The
maximum ORP of 545 mV for MW-6 was reported during the Month 1 sampling event.
o The acenaphthene concentration increased from 670 µg/L during the baseline event to
710 µg/L at Week 2, then decreased to 130 µg/L during Month 1 (82% decrease from
the Week 2 concentration). Between Month 1 and Month 3, the acenaphthene
concentration increased to 210 µg/L.
o Similar to acenaphthene, the 2-methylnaphthalene concentration increased slightly
between the baseline event (1,000 µg/L) and Week 2 (1,100 µg/L). Between the Week
2 and Month 1 sampling events, the 2-methylnaphthalene concentration decreased to
580 µg/L; 47% decrease). The concentration then increased to 800 µg/L in Month 3.
o The dibenzofuran concentration increased slightly from a baseline value of 350 µg/L
to 370 µg/L during the Week 2 sampling event, then decreased by 41% to a
concentration of 220 µg/L during the Month 1 sampling event. Between Month 1 and
Month 3, the dibenzofuran concentration increased slightly to 240 µg/L.
o The 1,1-biphenyl concentration was 140 µg/L during the baseline event and 150 µg/L
during the Week 2 sampling event. The results for the Month 1 and Month 3 sampling
events were 120 µg/L and 110 µg/L, respectively. The latter result is 21% lower than
the baseline concentration.
It is possible that some of the slight concentration changes noted above were due to natural
variability instead of the pilot study. In addition, the volume of oxidant solution could have diluted
the SVOC concentrations. The Work Plan Addendum for this pilot study (HGL, 2021a) estimated
the total pore volume of the PWR treatment zone to be 7,107 gal. Between the two MFR injection
events, a total volume of 1,064 gal was injected. This injection volume represents 15% of the pore
volume. The total volume of sodium permanganate solution, 1,669 gal, is 24% of the treatment
zone pore volume.
Figure 4.5 compares the percent concentration decreases observed in MW-57 and MW-58 between
the baseline and Week 2 sampling events to the estimated MFR pore volume displacement of 15%.
Percent concentration decreases at or less than 15% may be solely due to dilution; percent
concentration decreases greater than 15% are likely due to a combination of dilution and
degradation. As shown in Figure 4.5, it is likely that the MFR treatment resulted in some
degradation of naphthalene at both wells, acenaphthene at MW-57, and 2-methylnaphthalene and
1,1-biphenyl at MW-58.
Figure 4.6 compares the percent concentration decreases observed at MW-57 and MW-58 between
the Week 2 and Month 1 sampling events to the pore volume displacement of 24% associated with
the sodium permanganate injection. Percent concentration decreases less than 24% might be due
to dilution instead of actual degradation. Percent concentration decreases greater than 24% are
likely due to degradation in addition to dilution. As shown in Figure 4.6, naphthalene,
acenaphthene, and 2-methylnaphthalene concentrations at both wells in the treatment zone
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
4-5
decreased by more than 24%, indicating that these compounds were degraded in addition to
diluted. The decrease in dibenzofuran concentration at MW-57 could have been solely due to
dilution.
As noted in Section 2.2, the bench-scale study results indicated that sodium permanganate could
effectively degrade the low molecular weight PAHs (naphthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene,
acenaphthene) but was less effective in treating 1,1-biphenyl and dibenzofuran. Conversely, MFR
could effectively degrade the latter two SVOCs but was not effective in treating the low molecular
weight PAHs. The limited degradation of 1,1-biphenyl and dibenzofuran observed during the pilot
study is likely due to the inability to inject the design quantity of hydrogen peroxide. The data
indicate that MFR degraded some of the low molecular weight PAHs. It is not known whether
degradation by MFR occurred through oxidation or aerobic biodegradation from the oxygen
released by the hydrogen peroxide. The sodium permanganate solution degraded the low molecular
weight PAHs. The contaminant rebound that occurred between Month 1 and Month 3 suggests
that sodium permanganate was largely consumed within a month or two after injection.
At downgradient well MW-2, naphthalene was the only SVOC to show a substantial decrease in
concentration. Better treatment was observed at MW-6, where the naphthalene, acenaphthene, 2-
methylnaphthalene, and dibenzofuran concentrations substantially decreased between the baseline
event and Month 1 before rebounding in Month 3. The decrease in dibenzofuran concentration
suggests some downgradient effects of treatment by MFR.
All 1,1-biphenyl and acenaphthene results were less than the cleanup levels, while all naphthalene,
dibenzofuran, and 2-methylnaphthalene results were greater than the cleanup levels. Although the
pilot study decreased concentrations of the latter three compounds, there was not enough
degradation to meet the cleanup levels.
4.3 METALS
Metals may be temporarily mobilized in the aquifer following the ISCO injections due to the
oxidant’s composition and changes in groundwater geochemistry. This section discusses results of
dissolved and total metals analyses. Due to a Scribe/CoC error, baseline monitoring data are
available for only iron and manganese; therefore, changes in other metals can only be evaluated
following MFR injections.
Changes in manganese concentrations can be used qualitatively to assess the presence of sodium
permanganate. At MWs MW-57 and MW-58, manganese concentrations increased by multiple
orders of magnitude between Week 2 and Month 1 performance monitoring events. Concentrations
of dissolved manganese then decreased between the Month 1 and Month 3 performance monitoring
events, indicating that dissolved manganese mostly precipitated at Month 3. The manganese
concentration at downgradient well MW-6 also increased between Week 2 and Month 1, then
decreased between Month 1 and Month 3. At well MW-2, the greatest increase in manganese
concentration occurred between Months 1 and 3, suggesting that sodium permanganate influenced
this downgradient area between 1 month and 3 months post-injection.
Dissolved iron concentrations at each MW were greater than 1,000 µg/L during baseline sampling.
At all MWs, dissolved iron concentrations decreased to non-detectable levels by Month 1 (MW-57,
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
4-6
MW-58, and MW-6) or Month 3 (MW-2). Between Month 1 and Month 3, there was some rebound
towards the baseline concentration measured at MW MW-6.
Many of the metals were not detected in the groundwater samples or did not show appreciable
changes in concentration. The bullets below discuss the metals that exhibited substantial
concentration changes between the Week 2 and Month 3 performance monitoring events.
• Barium: At MW-57, the dissolved barium concentration increased from 61 µg/L during the
Week 2 monitoring event to 510 µg/L during the Month 1 monitoring event, while the
concentration at MW-58 increased from 100 µg/L to 1,300 µg/L. By Month 3, the barium
concentration at both wells had decreased to less than the initial detections. In the
downgradient wells, barium concentrations appeared to have been unaffected by the
permanganate injection.
• Calcium: Calcium concentrations at MW-57 and MW-58 increased by more than an order
of magnitude from less than 10,000 µg/L before sodium permanganate injection to 160,000
µg/L one month after sodium permanganate injection. By Month 3, calcium concentrations
had decreased to 82,000 µg/L at MW-57 and 6,800 µg/L at MW-58. At MW MW-2, the
calcium concentration increased from 6,300 µg/L during Month 1 to 31,000 µg/L during
Month 3 after being stable between Week 2 and Month 1. At MW MW-6, the calcium
concentration appeared to be stable.
• Chromium: Chromium concentrations increased at each MW following sodium
permanganate injection. Concentrations increased from non-detect to greater than 100 µg/L
at MWs MW-57 and MW-58 (160 µg/L and 390 µg/L, respectively) and greater than or
equal to 10 µg/L at MW-2 and MW-6 (10 µg/L and 62 µg/L, respectively). At Month 3,
the dissolved chromium concentration at MW-57 (150 µg/L) remained elevated while the
dissolved chromium concentrations at MW-58 (8.9 µg/L) and MW-6 (46 µg/L) had
decreased. Because the samples were not analyzed for hexavalent chromium, it is not
known how much of the increases in chromium concentrations were due to generation of
hexavalent chromium.
• Lead: Within the treatment zone, the lead concentration increased from non-detectable
levels at MW-57 and MW-58 to 34 µg/L and 78 µg/L, respectively, during the Month 1
monitoring event. This concentration increase was temporary. By Month 3, the lead
concentration had decreased to non-detectable levels at both wells, with reporting limits of
12 µg/L for MW-57 and 16 µg/L for MW-58. Lead was not detected in the filtered samples
from the downgradient wells, suggesting that the temporary increase in lead concentration
within the treatment zone did not migrate downgradient.
• Magnesium: Magnesium concentrations increased by one order of magnitude at MWs
MW-57 and MW-58 following sodium permanganate injections. Concentrations increased
at MW-57 from 1,400 µg/L to 40,000 µg/L and at MW-58 from 2,400 µg/L to 39,000 µg/L.
Concentrations remained elevated through Month 3 at MW MW-57 (23,000 µg/L) but
decreased at MW MW-58 (1,700 µg/L).
• At MW MW-2, the magnesium concentration increased from Month 1 to Month 3 (1,700
µg/L to 9,400 µg/L) after being stable between Week 2 and Month 1. The magnesium
concentration at MW MW-6 did not appear to have been affected by the oxidant injections.
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
4-7
• Nickel: At both MW-57 and MW-58, nickel was not detected in the Week 2 monitoring
event and Month 3 monitoring event samples. During the Month 1 sampling event, the
dissolved nickel concentrations were 34 µg/L in MW-57 and 81 µg/L in MW-58,
suggesting temporary dissolution of this metal. In the downgradient wells, nickel was not
detected until Month 3. At that time, the dissolved nickel concentration was 5.1 µg/L at
MW-2 and 90 µg/L at MW-6. Because the reporting limit for the non-detect results was 40
µg/L, it is not known if the Month 3 detection for MW-2 represented an increase in nickel
concentration. The detection for MW-6 indicates downgradient migration of nickel from
the treatment zone.
• Selenium: Although the detections were not confirmed by the analytical method, the Month
1 selenium results suggest a temporary spike in dissolved selenium concentration within
the treatment zone following the sodium permanganate injection.
• Silver: The dissolved silver concentration within the treatment zone increased from non-
detectable levels during the Week 2 monitoring event to 83 µg/L in MW-57 and 200 µg/L
in MW-58 during the Month 1 monitoring event, then decreased to non-detectable levels
during the Month 3 event. Silver concentrations for MW-2 and MW-6 did not appear to
have been affected by the permanganate injection.
• Thallium: Similar to selenium, the data suggest that the dissolved thallium concentration
within the treatment zone spiked one month after the sodium permanganate injection and
then decreased. Because the detections were not confirmed by the analytical method, there
is uncertainty in these results.
• Sodium: Sodium permanganate injection increased the sodium concentrations at all four
MWs. At MW-2, the change in sodium concentration was not apparent until Month 3. For
all four wells, the Week 2 sodium results ranged from approximately 7,000 µg/L to 8,000
µg/L. At MW MW-57, the sodium concentration increased to 100,000 µg/L during Month
1 and remained elevated through Month 3 (130,000 µg/L). At MW MW-58, the sodium
concentration increased to 380,000 µg/L Month 1 and then decreased to 17,000 µg/L
during Month 3. At MW MW-2, the sodium concentration increased to 19,000 µg/L during
Month 3. At MW MW-6, the sodium concentration increased to 92,000 µg/L during Month
1 and then decreased to 27,000 µg/L during Month 3.
The data indicate that cobalt, which is a groundwater COC, was not affected by the oxidant
injections. In summary, injection of sodium permanganate caused a temporary increase in the
dissolved concentrations of multiple metals.
4.4 PERMANGANATE, HYDROGEN PEROXIDE, AND IRON FIELD TESTS
The results from field tests are provided in Table 4.1. Hydrogen peroxide field tests were not used
during the majority of the performance monitoring due to interference from compounds naturally
present in Site groundwater, as discussed in Section 3.2.8.
Iron field tests were used during only the baseline and Week 2 performance monitoring events per
the Work Plan Addendum (HGL, 2021a). The purpose of this testing was to evaluate the presence
of the iron catalyst associated with MFR. Decreases in iron concentrations were measured at MWs
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
4-8
MW-58, MW-2, and MW-6. The iron concentration increased from 0.9 mg/L to 5.7 mg/L at MW
MW-57.
Permanganate field tests were utilized intermittently during the monitoring period. Following
sodium permanganate injections, visual observations were the primary means of evaluating
whether permanganate was still present in groundwater or whether the oxidant had been consumed.
During the Month 3 performance monitoring event, there was visual evidence of permanganate (a
purple or pink color in groundwater) in MWs MW-57, 58, and MW-2. A measurement was made
at MW-6 during Month 3, and the result was 0.4 mg/L of permanganate. Based on descriptions
provided during Month 1 performance monitoring, permanganate concentrations decreased
between Month 1 and 3 performance monitoring events (color descriptions during Month 3 were
more often described as “light”).
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
5-1
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This section provides conclusions and recommendations from the implementation of the ISCO
pilot test completed at the Site. The following subsections are organized in accordance with the
objectives described in Section 2.0.
5.1 INJECTION PROCESS AND PARAMETERS
Based on the ISCO injection execution, sequential injection of MFR and sodium permanganate is
not appropriate at the Site. It was observed that MFR injections were generally prone to daylighting
regardless of injection rate, and intense reactions occurred in the subsurface when the design
dosage was injected, making it difficult or not possible to inject the required oxidant dosing at the
Site. Permanganate was injected with limited daylighting using low-pressure injection techniques.
It appears that low-pressure injection via DPT or injection wells is an appropriate method for
distributing a permanganate solution in the subsurface.
Injection pressures were generally less than 30 psi and injection rates ranged from less than 1 to 3
gpm. Visual observation and geochemical evidence indicated that an ROI of at least 6 ft can be
achieved in the PWR and saprolite zones at the design volume.
5.2 GROUNDWATER CHEMISTRY
Performance monitoring during the two weeks following the injection of MFR and three months
following the injection of sodium permanganate indicated the following regarding the effect of the
oxidants on the groundwater chemistry, primarily changes in DO and ORP:
• DO generally increased within the treatment zone following MFR injections and was
measured at concentrations greater than saturation levels during the Week 2 performance
monitoring event (MW-57 and MW-58) and Month 1 performance monitoring event (MW-
57). DO increased, but to a lesser extent, at the downgradient PWR MW (MW-2) during
the Week 2 performance monitoring event. DO did not increase at the downgradient
saprolite MW (MW-6), which is expected as MFR was not injected directly into the
saprolite zone.
• ORP generally increased from baseline to Month 3 at performance MWs MW-57, MW-
58, and MW-2. At MW MW-6, ORP increased from baseline through Month 1, then
decreased to near baseline conditions during Month 3. At all MW locations, ORP increases
were greatest following sodium permanganate injections.
5.3 CONTAMINANT REDUCTION EFFICACY
Performance monitoring during the three months following the ISCO injections indicated the
following regarding the ability of MFR and sodium permanganate to reduce target SVOC
concentrations:
• Within the treatment area (MW-57 and MW-58), the MFR injection appeared to have
degraded naphthalene at both wells, acenaphthene at MW-57, and 2-methylnaphthalene
and 1,1-biphenyl at MW-58. The sodium permanganate injection degraded low molecular
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
5-2
weight PAHs (naphthalene, acenaphthene, and 2-methylnaphthalene) at both wells. SVOC
concentrations, however, did not decrease to less than the cleanup values.
• Both downgradient MWs (MW-2 in the PWR and MW-6 in the saprolite) were influenced
by the ISCO injections. At well MW-2, naphthalene was the only SVOC to show a
substantial decrease in concentration. Better treatment was observed at MW-6, where the
naphthalene, acenaphthene, 2-methylnaphthalene, and dibenzofuran concentrations
substantially decreased between the baseline event and Month 1 before rebounding in
Month 3. The decrease in dibenzofuran concentration suggests some downgradient effects
of treatment by MFR.
The limited degradation that occurred after the MFR injection was likely due to the inability to
inject the design quantity of hydrogen peroxide. Sodium permanganate was able to reduce the
concentration of multiple target SVOCs (naphthalene, acenaphthene, and 2-methylnaphthalene),
but was not effective at treating other target SVOCs (1,1-biphenyl and dibenzofuran). Multiple
permanganate injections would likely be required to reduce contaminant concentrations below Site
cleanup target levels, and even then this oxidant might not degrade all of the semivolatile COCs.
Sodium permanganate increased the dissolved concentrations of multiple metals within the
treatment zone, and some of these elevated metal concentrations migrated to the downgradient
wells. The Month 3 data suggest that the increases in metal concentrations are temporary and that
concentrations will return to baseline levels with time.
5.4 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the results presented in Section 4 and the conclusions present above, the following
recommendations and observations should be considered in developing a remedial strategy for the
Site.
• MFR does not appear to be a viable oxidation technology for the Site because of the
challenges delivering the design dose of the oxidant,
• Permanganate is a viable oxidant for the Site. During the pilot test, sodium permanganate
was successful at treating naphthalene, acenaphthene, and 2-methylnaphthalene, but not
1,1-biphenyl and dibenzofuran. If ISCO with sodium permanganate injection is selected as
a remedial technology for the Site, it should be paired with another remedial technology,
such as aerobic bioremediation, to treat all of the target SVOCs. HGL evaluated the
effectiveness of the aerobic bioremediation technology with a pilot test in the saprolite zone
(HGL, 2021b).
• Injection activities can achieve an ROI of at least 6 ft, and the Site’s groundwater flow can
aid in the distribution of oxidant to enhance downgradient distribution.
• Multiple rounds of sodium permanganate injection would likely be required to reduce
concentrations of the target SVOCs below their cleanup levels. The injection frequency
should be selected based on field measurement of residual permanganate levels in the
MWs. The rebound in SVOC concentrations observed during the Month 3 monitoring
event indicates that the oxidant dose administered was consumed within 3 months.
HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
5-3
• Permanganate injection temporarily increases the dissolved concentrations of multiple
metals. If this technology is implemented full-scale, the performance monitoring program
would need to include TAL metals analysis to track changes in dissolved metals
concentrations.

HGL, ISCO Pilot Test Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, NC

U.S. EPA Region 4
6-1
6.0 REFERENCES
HydroGeoLogic, Inc. (HGL), 2020. Final Sampling and Analysis Plan; Volume 1: Field Sampling
Plan and Volume 2 Uniform Federal Policy Quality Assurance Project Plan; Holcomb
Creosote Company Site. January.
HGL, 2021a. Addendum to the Final Work Plan - In Situ Chemical Oxidation Treatability Study
and In Situ Enhanced Bioremediation Pilot Test; Holcomb Creosote Company Site. July
HGL, 2021b. In Situ Enhanced Bioremediation Pilot Test Report; Holcomb Creosote Company
Site. August
EPA, 2018. Record of Decision, Holcomb Creosote Company Superfund Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin
County, North Carolina. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. August.
Versar, 2017a. Final Remedial Investigation Report, Holcomb Creosote Company Superfund Site,
Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North Carolina. May.
Versar, 2017b. Final Feasibility Study Report (Rev 1), Holcomb Creosote Company Superfund
Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North Carolina. December.

TABLES
Table 3.1Injection Volume SummaryIn Situ Chemical Oxidation Pilot Test ReportHolcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North CarolinaInjection LocationInjection Interval (ft bgs) 1Oxidant Design Volume (gal)Oxidant Design ConcentrationCatalyst Design Volume (gal)Date of Injection Injection Solution2Solution Volume Injected (gal)Total Cumulative Volume (gal)Oxidant Cumulative Volume (gal)08/18/21H2O2 (8.4% dose)25.0 25.0MFR/Catalyst Solution08/19/21H2O2 (4.2% dose)40.0 65.009/02/21H2O2 (0.5% dose)50.0 115.009/15/21NaMnO4 (8.6%)246.1 361.1NaMnO4 Solution09/17/21NaMnO4 (8.6%)293.9 655.0540.0Water315.0 15.0MFR/Catalyst SolutionH2O2 (8.4% dose)148.0 163.0Water20.0 183.0H2O2 (4.2%)90.0 273.0Water10.0 283.0Catalyst119.0 402.0H2O2 (4.2%)25.0 427.0Water10.0 437.009/02/21H2O2 (0.5%)346.4 783.4NaMnO4 Solution540 8.6 NA 09/16/21NaMnO4 (8.6%)540.0 1323.4540.008/18/21H2O2 (8.4% dose)25.0 25.0MFR/Catalyst Solution08/19/21H2O2 (4.2% dose)10.0 35.072.5 / 009/02/21H2O2 (0.5% dose)37.5 72.5NaMnO4 Solution540 8.6 NA 09/15/21NaMnO4 (8.6%)109.6 182.1109.608/18/21H2O2 (8.4% dose)40.0 40.0MFR/Catalyst Solution08/19/21H2O2 (4.2% dose)15.0 55.009/02/21H2O2 (0.5% dose)37.6 92.609/15/21NaMnO4 (8.6%)162.2 254.8NaMnO4 Solution09/17/21NaMnO4 (8.6%)336.9 591.7 499.123 to 250.0NaMnO4 Solution21 to 23131.019 to 21131.009/16/2133.233.209/17/2156.389.5Notes:1All injection intervals are presented in ft bgs.% = weight percentage H2O2 = hydrogen peroxide2 Injection solution is presented in the order of injection at each location.DPT = direct push technology MFR = modified Fenton's reagent 3 Water injected at first location to help establish flow in the subsurface.ft bgs = feet below ground surface. NA = not applicablegal = gallons NaMnO4 = sodium permanganate655 12.6 NA5408.4 1198.6 NA238119NA119238 8.4 1192385408.48.6238 8.408/18/2108/19/2109/16/21351.5Injection WellsTemporary Injection LocationDPT 13INJ-1 23 to 33INJ-2 23 to 3317 to 19INJ-4 23 to 33INJ-3 23 to 33NaMnO4 (12.6%)NaMnO4 (12.6%)262.0115.0 / 092.6 / 0783.4 / 119.0Page 1 of 1
Table 3.2Daylighting Summary In Situ Chemical Oxidation Pilot Test ReportHolcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North CarolinaInjection LocationInjection Interval (ft bgs) Date of Injection1Injection Solution2Volume Injected (gal)Daylighting (Y/N)Cumulative Volume Injected(gal)08/18/21H2O2 (8.4% dose)25.0 Y 25.008/19/21H2O2 (4.2% dose)10.0 Y 35.008/19/21H2O2 (4.2% dose)30.0 N 65.009/02/21H2O2 (0.5% dose)12.5 Y 77.509/02/21H2O2 (0.5% dose)37.5 Y 115.009/15/21NaMnO4 (8.6%)246.1 N 361.109/17/21NaMnO4 (8.6%)293.9 N 655.008/18/21H2O2 (8.4% dose) / Water / Catalyst183.0 N 183.008/19/21H2O2 (4.2% dose) / Water / Catalyst254.0 N 437.009/02/21H2O2 (0.5% dose)346.4 N 783.409/16/21NaMnO4 (8.6%)540.0 N 1323.408/18/21H2O2 (8.4% dose)25.0 Y 25.008/19/21H2O2 (4.2% dose)10.0 Y 35.009/02/21H2O2 (0.5% dose)46.5 Y 71.509/15/21NaMnO4 (8.6%)109.6 Y 144.608/18/21H2O2 (8.4% dose)40.0 Y 40.008/19/21H2O2 (4.2% dose)45.0 Y 85.009/02/21H2O2 (0.5% dose)4.2 Y 89.209/15/21NaMnO4 (8.6%)162.2 N 247.209/17/21NaMnO4 (8.6%)336.9 N 584.123 to 25 0.0 N21 to 23 131.0 N19 to 21 131.0 N09/16/21 33.2 Y 33.209/17/21 26.6 Y 59.8Notes:1 Date of injection indicates the date injections occurred at each location. If multiple entries % = weight percentageH2O2 = hydrogen peroxide are presented for a single date, then we observed multiple instances of daylighting at that location.ft bgs = feet below ground surfaceNaMnO4 = sodium permanganate2 Injection solution is presented in the order of injection at each location.gal = gallons Y/N = Yes/NoInjection Wells23 to 3323 to 3323 to 3323 to 33262.0INJ-1INJ-209/16/21DPT - 1317 to 19INJ-3INJ-4NaMnO4 (12.6%)Temporary Injection LocationsPage 1 of 1
Table 3.3
Depth-to-Water During ISCO Injections
In Situ Chemical Oxidation Pilot Test Report
Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North Carolina
Monitoring
Well Date Time
Active Injection
Location1
Depth-to-Water
(ft BTOC)
MW-58 9:09 6.10
MW-57 9:12 6.30
MW-2 9:14 4.43
MW-3 9:17 < 1
MW-58 11:45 2.80
MW-57 11:45 4.34
MW-2 11:45 4.47
MW-58 7:53 6.32
MW-57 7:56 6.62
MW-2 7:57 3.44
MW-3 8:00 0.82
MW-58 8:50 4.26
MW-57 8:52 5.94
MW-2 8:54 4.61
MW-58 9:20 3.93
MW-57 9:21 5.18
MW-2 9:22 4.15
MW-58 9:59 4.26
MW-57 10:00 5.15
MW-2 10:01 3.78
MW-58 11:13 4.13
MW-57 11:12 5.03
MW-2 11:11 3.65
MW-58 11:45 INJ-4 5.48
MW-58 13:11 6.03
MW-57 13:10 6.33
MW-2 13:08 4.30
MW-58 13:20 6.41
MW-57 13:21 6.41
MW-2 13:22 4.46
MW-58 15:02 5.80
MW-57 15:01 6.01
MW-2 14:58 3.91
MW-3 15:09 < 0.5
MW-58 7:39 6.36
MW-57 7:40 6.72
MW-2 7:42 4.70
MW-3 7:43 0.79
MW-7 7:48 2.23
MW-58 9:48 5.75
MW-57 9:49 5.62
MW-2 9:50 4.40
MW-7 9:52 2.06
MW-3 9:53 < 0.5
None (Pre-Injection)
None (Post-injection)
None (Post-injection)
None (Pre-Injection)
INJ-2
08/18/21
08/19/21
08/18/21
08/19/21
08/19/21
08/19/21
08/19/21
08/19/21
08/19/21
08/19/21
09/02/21
INJ-2
INJ-2
INJ-2
INJ-2
09/02/21
None
INJ-3
INJ-1 & 3
Page 1 of 5
Table 3.3 (Continued)
Depth-to-Water During ISCO Injections
In Situ Chemical Oxidation Pilot Test Report
Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North Carolina
Monitoring
Well Date Time
Active Injection
Location1
Depth-to-Water
(ft BTOC)
MW-58 11:17 5.93
MW-57 11:18 5.65
MW-2 11:18 4.16
MW-7 11:19 2.01
MW-3 11:20 < 0.5
MW-58 12:49 4.88
MW-57 12:50 5.76
MW-2 12:57 4.14
MW-7 12:52 2.07
MW-3 12:52 < 0.5
MW-58 14:26 3.80
MW-57 14:28 4.89
MW-2 14:29 3.31
MW-7 14:30 1.95
MW-3 14:31 < 0.5
MW-58 15:45 4.96
MW-57 15:46 5.40
MW-2 15:48 3.96
MW-7 15:49 2.02
MW-3 16:50 < 0.5
MW-6 16:40 4.12
MW-58 8:43 6.71
MW-57 8:44 6.96
MW-2 9:15 5.17
MW-6 9:16 5.04
MW-7 9:17 2.38
MW-58 12:22 5.60
MW-57 12:21 5.79
MW-2 12:20 5.06
MW-6 12:19 4.64
MW-7 12:23 2.41
MW-58 13:25 4.36
MW-57 13:26 4.59
MW-2 13:26 4.17
MW-6 13:26 3.63
MW-7 13:27 2.34
MW-58 14:22 4.42
MW-57 14:23 5.34
MW-2 14:24 3.91
MW-6 14:25 3.79
MW-7 14:26 2.26
MW-58 15:44 5.34
MW-57 15:45 5.72
MW-2 15:46 3.66
MW-6 15:47 3.83
MW-7 15:48 2.24
None (Post-injection)
None (Pre-Injection)
09/15/21
09/15/21 INJ-1
None
09/15/21
09/15/21
09/15/21
INJ-1 &3
INJ-1 &3
09/02/21
09/02/21
09/02/21
09/02/21
INJ-4
INJ-2
INJ-2
Page 2 of 5
Table 3.3 (Continued)
Depth-to-Water During ISCO Injections
In Situ Chemical Oxidation Pilot Test Report
Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North Carolina
Monitoring
Well Date Time
Active Injection
Location1
Depth-to-Water
(ft BTOC)
MW-58 17:40 6.27
MW-57 17:41 6.75
MW-2 17:42 4.65
MW-6 17:44 6.41
MW-7 17:45 2.35
MW-58 7:26 6.69
MW-57 7:27 6.94
MW-2 7:28 5.15
MW-6 7:29 5.01
MW-7 7:30 2.42
MW-58 8:54 6.45
MW-57 8:55 6.88
MW-2 8:56 5.11
MW-6 8:57 4.91
MW-7 8:58 2.41
MW-58 9:17 5.02
MW-57 9:18 6.14
MW-2 9:19 4.91
MW-6 9:19 4.42
MW-7 9:20 2.4
MW-58 10:33 4.80
MW-57 10:34 5.25
MW-2 10:35 4.21
MW-6 10:36 3.64
MW-7 10:37 2.32
MW-58 12:23 5.62
MW-57 12:24 5.54
MW-2 12:24 3.77
MW-6 12:25 3.78
MW-7 12:26 2.19
MW-58 14:14 6.21
MW-57 14:14 6.36
MW-2 14:15 4.51
MW-6 14:14 3.76
MW-7 14:16 2.99
MW-58 15:39 5.95
MW-57 15:40 6.12
MW-2 15:41 4.17
MW-6 15:38 3.51
MW-7 15:42 2.26
MW-58 16:23 5.88
MW-57 16:23 5.94
MW-2 16:24 4.07
MW-6 16:22 3.10
MW-7 16:25 2.24
09/16/21
09/16/21
INJ-2
INJ-2
None (Pre-Injection)
09/15/21
09/16/21
None (Post-injection)
09/16/21
09/16/21
09/16/21
09/16/21
09/16/21
INJ-2
INJ-2
DPT - 13
DPT - 13
DPT - 13
Page 3 of 5
Table 3.3 (Continued)
Depth-to-Water During ISCO Injections
In Situ Chemical Oxidation Pilot Test Report
Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North Carolina
Monitoring
Well Date Time
Active Injection
Location1
Depth-to-Water
(ft BTOC)
MW-58 17:04 5.58
MW-57 17:05 5.65
MW-2 17:06 3.78
MW-6 17:02 2.44
MW-7 17:07 2.22
MW-58 17:29 5.77
MW-57 17:30 6.10
MW-2 17:31 3.95
MW-6 17:27 3.92
MW-7 17:32 2.21
MW-58 7:07 6.65
MW-57 7:08 6.90
MW-2 7:09 5.02
MW-6 7:10 4.92
MW-7 7:11 2.38
MW-58 8:20 6.47
MW-57 8:21 6.74
MW-2 8:22 4.85
MW-6 8:17 4.60
MW-7 8:24 2.37
MW-58 9:03 4.09
MW-57 9:04 4.88
MW-2 9:05 4.42
MW-6 9:07 4.06
MW-7 9:09 2.35
MW-58 9:48 4.36
MW-57 9:49 4.75
MW-2 9:50 3.82
MW-6 9:51 3.76
MW-7 9:53 2.29
MW-58 10:43 4.29
MW-57 10:44 4.57
MW-2 10:45 3.61
MW-6 10:46 3.66
MW-7 10:47 2.24
MW-58 12:16 5.36
MW-57 12:17 5.26
MW-2 12:18 4.25
MW-6 12:19 4.24
MW-7 12:20 2.27
MW-58 13:04 5.69
MW-57 13:05 4.72
MW-2 13:06 3.74
MW-6 13:07 3.79
MW-7 13:08 2.25
09/17/21
09/17/21
09/17/21
09/16/21
09/17/21
09/17/21
09/17/21
09/17/21
09/16/21
INJ-1, INJ-4
INJ-1, INJ-4
INJ-1, INJ-4
INJ-1, INJ-4
INJ-1, INJ-4
DPT - 13
DPT - 13 (17 to 19)
None (Pre-Injection)
None (Post-injection)
Page 4 of 5
Table 3.3 (Continued)
Depth-to-Water During ISCO Injections
In Situ Chemical Oxidation Pilot Test Report
Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North Carolina
Monitoring
Well Date Time
Active Injection
Location1
Depth-to-Water
(ft BTOC)
MW-58 13:53 4.39
MW-57 13:54 4.44
MW-2 13:55 3.44
MW-6 13:56 3.55
MW-7 13:57 2.21
MW-58 14:51 5.36
MW-57 14:52 4.66
MW-2 14:53 3.50
MW-6 14:54 3.72
MW-7 14:55 2.21
MW-58 15:41 4.92
MW-57 15:42 5.38
MW-2 15:43 3.49
MW-6 15:44 3.81
MW-7 15:55 2.21
Notes:
1 Active Injection Location indicates which injection location(s) was/were active during depth-to-water measurement.
< = less than presented value
DPT = direct push technology
ft BTOC = feet below top of casing
ISCO = in situ chemical oxidation
09/17/21
09/17/21 INJ-1, INJ-4
INJ-1, INJ-4
None (Post-injection)
09/17/21
Page 5 of 5
Table 3.4Injection Pressures and Flow Rates Summary In Situ Chemical Oxidation Pilot Test Report Holcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North CarolinaMinimum Maximum Minimum MaximumINJ-1H2O20.0 0.0 0.5 1.7INJ-2H2O2 / Water20.0 25.0 2.0 3.0INJ-3H2O20.0 0.0 1.0 1.3INJ-4H2O20.0 0.0 0.6 2.0INJ-1 1.6 4.0 0.6 1.3INJ-3 0.0 2.1 0.8 3.0INJ-4 0.0 2.6 0.8 1.309/16/21 INJ-2 23 - 33NaMnO411.9 20.7 1.1 3.1INJ-1 0.0 5.5 0.0 2.4INJ-4 0.0 5.6 0.0 1.823-25 35.0 35.0 0.0 0.021-23 34.2 36.4 1.0 1.319-21 23.2 36.8 1.8 3.109/16/2109/17/21Notes:ft bgs = feet below ground surfaceDPT = direct push technologygpm = gallons per minuteH2O2 = hydrogen peroxideNaMnO4 = sodium permanganatepsi = pounds per square inch1Ranges of injection pressures and flow rates were not measured during the first modified Fenton's reagent (MFR) injections in August 2021 because the monitoring equipment (flow meter and pressure gauge) were not provided by the injection subcontractor. Metering equipment was provided during the second injections.Temporary Injection Locations17-1909/16/21 DPT-131.0 2.509/02/2109/15/21NaMnO409/17/2116.1DPT-13NaMnO4NaMnO43.623 - 3323 - 3323 - 33NaMnO4Injection WellsInjection LocationInjection Pressure (psi) Flow Rate (gpm)Date1Injection SolutionInjection Interval (ft bgs)Page 1 of 1
Table 3.5Geochemical Parameters During ISCO Injections In Situ Chemical Oxidation Pilot Test ReportHolcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North CarolinaMonitoring Well Monitoring Event Injection MaterialDate TimepH(S.U.)DO(mg/L)ORP(mV)Specific Conductivity(μS/cm)Temperature(°C)Baseline 10:30 5.10 0.33 -86.7 104.0 18.27INJ-2 Active 12:08 5.63 0.50 -145.4 100.0 18.2308:13 4.98 41.34 -21.9 98.0 15.6315:22 14.94+ 37.56 53.9 95.0 18.37Pre-Injection 08:05 6.15 7.26 153.2 74.0 18.02Post-Injection 16:05 6.05 8.40 75.4 72.0 19.07Pre-Injection 09:00 5.93 0.21 94.4 62.0 18.20Post-Injection 17:51 5.79 0.32 103.4 60.0 19.46Pre-Injection 07:43 5.55 0.30 124.4 64.0 18.58Post-Injection 17:46 5.79 0.33 111.5 62.0 18.65Pre-Injection 07:24 5.90 5.61 149.9 61.0 18.45Post-Injection++ 16:07 11.10 0.42 -278.7 64.0 19.38BaselineH2O208/18/21 10:15 5.83 1.14 -78.8 150.0 19.25Pre-Injection 08:06 5.29 41.77 -12.9 126.0 15.46Post-Injection 15:30 14.94+ 43.74 70.2 116.0 15.96Pre-Injection 08:00 7.06 23.54 146.2 108.0 17.64Post-Injection 15:58 6.25 23.74 80.1 102.0 18.41Pre-Injection 08:53 6.03 16.31 87.6 82.0 17.95Post-Injection 17:46 5.82 17.67 90.2 79.0 18.43Pre-Injection 07:35 5.48 15.95 141.6 78.0 18.05Post-Injection 17:39 5.77 14.80 106.6 79.0 18.22Pre-Injection 07:16 5.89 11.70 168.0 75.0 18.22Post-Injection++ 16:02 11.63 14.13 -94.5 81.0 19.01H2O2H2O2NaMnO4NaMnO4NaMnO4MW-58MW-57INJ-2 StoppedH2O2H2O2H2O2NaMnO4NaMnO4NaMnO4Within ROI (Interior to Pilot Test Area)08/19/2109/02/2109/15/2109/16/2109/17/2108/18/2108/19/2109/02/2109/15/2109/16/2109/17/21Page 1 of 3
Table 3.5 (Continued)Geochemical Parameters During ISCO Injections In Situ Chemical Oxidation Pilot Test ReportHolcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North CarolinaMonitoring Well Monitoring Event Injection MaterialDate TimepH(S.U.)DO(mg/L)ORP(mV)Specific Conductivity(μS/cm)Temperature(°C)BaselineH2O208/18/21 10:34 5.17 0.14 -79.1 148.0 16.80Pre-Injection 08:23 6.91 0.07 -91.8 147.0 14.33Post-Injection 15:04 9.95+ 0.27 -36.9 149.0 14.11Pre-Injection 08:12 5.95 0.54 112.3 135.0 17.31Post-Injection 16:14 6.05 0.26 55.9 138.0 17.54Pre-Injection 09:20 6.18 0.71 56.9 116.0 17.01Post-Injection 17:56 6.03 0.62 58.7 122.0 17.05Pre-Injection 07:55 5.95 0.57 57.8 124.0 16.94Post-Injection 17:51 6.01 0.17 56.3 119.0 17.46Pre-Injection 07:29 6.04 0.36 86.5 114.0 18.35Post-Injection++ 16:13 11.48 0.27 -372.4 118.0 17.77Pre-Injection* 09:15 5.90 0.56 120.7 81.0 17.7716:36 5.37 50.47 65.2 77.0 16.6616:39 5.39 0.05 59.8 77.0 19.77Pre-Injection 09:30 5.82 0.11 87.8 81.0 17.23Post-Injection 18:00 5.68 0.54 87.0 89.0 17.66Pre-Injection 08:04 5.60 0.49 99.4 78.0 17.30Post-Injection 17:56 5.66 1.93 85.8 84.0 18.48Pre-Injection 07:33 5.73 0.41 110.9 79.0 18.31Post-Injection++ 16:20 11.37 0.20 -378.0 85.0 18.01Pre-Injection* 08:19 6.43 0.45 53.6 190.0 18.26Post-Injection 16:22 6.58 0.12 10.0 203.0 17.48Pre-Injection 09:37 6.94 0.08 -55.9 203.0 15.67Post-Injection 18:08 6.81 0.14 -59.7 199.0 17.84Pre-Injection 08:09 6.84 0.15 -42.6 191.0 18.96Post-Injection 18:01 6.82 0.58 -39.5 196.0 19.05Pre-Injection 07:39 6.90 0.23 -20.8 199.0 18.97Post-Injection++ 16:25 12.47 0.33 -322.1 201.0 18.29NaMnO4H2O2H2O2H2O2NaMnO4NaMnO4NaMnO4NaMnO4NaMnO4Downgradient MW-209/15/2109/16/2109/17/2109/02/2109/02/2109/15/2109/16/2109/17/21Post-InjectionH2O2NaMnO4NaMnO4NaMnO4MW-7MW-608/19/2109/02/2109/15/2109/16/2109/17/21Page 2 of 3
Table 3.5 (Continued)Geochemical Parameters During ISCO Injections In Situ Chemical Oxidation Pilot Test ReportHolcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North CarolinaMonitoring Well Monitoring Event Injection MaterialDate TimepH(S.U.)DO(mg/L)ORP(mV)Specific Conductivity(μS/cm)Temperature(°C)BaselineH2O208/18/21 10:39 5.07 3.07 -61.2 94.0 17.79Pre-Injection 08:32 6.59 0.29 -86.0 129.0 15.89Post-Injection 15:15 16.01+ 0.44 -47.5 0.1 15.36Notes:* indicates the monitoring well was not included in the baseline monitoring prior to any injections occurring.+ indicates that the pH probe failed continuing calibration verification and was suspected of malfunctioning.++ indicates that the water quality meter is suspected of malfunctioning based on multiple unexpected geochemical measurements during this event. °C = degrees Celsiusmg/L = milligrams per litermV = millivoltsμS/cm = microsiemens per centimeterDO = dissolved oxygenH2O2 = hydrogen peroxideISCO = in situ chemical oxidationNaMnO4 = sodium permanganateORP = oxidation reduction potentialROI = radius of influenceS.U. = standard unitsH2O2SidegradientMW-308/19/21Page 3 of 3
Table 3.6ISCO Pilot Test Sampling and Analysis PlanIn Situ Chemical Oxidation Pilot Test ReportHolcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North CarolinaSVOCsDissolved Metals Permanganate Field TestHydrogen Peroxide and Iron Field Test SVOCsDissolved Metals Permanganate Field TestHydrogen Peroxide and Iron Field TestSaprolite MW-6 17 to 27 A A A A A AMW-223 to 33 (Partially in the PWR zone)AAAAAAMW-5723 to 33(Within the PWR zone)AAAAAAMW-5823 to 33 (Within the PWR zone)AAAAAASVOCsDissolved Metals Permanganate Field TestHydrogen Peroxide and Iron Field Test SVOCsDissolved Metals Permanganate Field TestHydrogen Peroxide and Iron Field TestSaprolite MW-6 17 to 27 A A Only Visual Observation A A AMW-223 to 33 (Partially in the PWR zone)A A Only Visual Observation A A Only Visual ObservationMW-5723 to 33(Within the PWR zone)A A Only Visual Observation A A Only Visual ObservationMW-5823 to 33 (Within the PWR zone)A A Only Visual Observation A A Only Visual ObservationNotes:1 This occurred approximately 12 days after the second round of modified Fenton's reagent (MFR) injections and before the sodium permanganate injections.2 This occurred approximately 1 month after the sodium permanganate injections.3 This occurred approximately 3 months after the sodium permanganate injections.A= analyzed NA = not analyzedft bgs = feet below ground surface PWR = partially weathered rockISCO = in situ chemical oxidation SVOC = semivolatile organic compound7/28/2021 to 7/29/2021 9/14/2021Treatment ZoneMonitoring WellScreen Interval(ft bgs)Baseline 2 Weeks Post-MFR Injections1AnalytesTreatment IntervalSampling LocationScreen Interval(ft bgs)1 Month Post-Permanganate Injections2PWR10/13/2021 to 10/14/2021 12/7/2021AnalytesPWRNAIron and Manganese Only3 Months Post-Permanganate Injections3NA NAPage 1 of 1
Table 4.1Performance Monitoring Sampling Results: Field Parameters, Field Tests, and SVOCsIn Situ Chemical Oxidation Pilot Test ReportHolcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North CarolinaMonitoring WellScreen Groundwater Cleanup Levels1 7/28/2021(Baseline)9/14/2021 (2 Weeks Post-MFR)210/13/2021 (1 Month Post-Permanganate )312/7/2021 (3 Months Post-Permanganate )47/28/2021(Baseline)9/14/2021 (2 Weeks Post-MFR )210/14/2021 (1 Month Post-Permanganate )312/7/2021 (3 Months Post-Permanganate )47/28/2021(Baseline)9/14/2021 (2 Weeks Post-MFR )210/13/2021 (1 Month Post-Permanganate)312/7/2021 (3 Months Post-Permanganate)47/28/2021(Baseline)9/14/2021 (2 Weeks Post-MFR)210/14/2021 (1 Month Post-Permanganate)312/7/2021 (3 Months Post-Permanganate) 4Field ParametersDissolved Oxygen (mg/L) -- 0.2 17.8 22.1 6.7 0.4 17.4 7.6 0.5 1.2 4.1 1.9 1.9 0.2 0.1 1.4 0.2ORP (mV) -- 85.1 153.8 811.0 761.1 -147.3 84.4 494.1 637.8 12.2 56.6 3.0 806.3 39.8 121.5 545.0 29.0pH (S.U.) -- 5.5 5.9 1.5 6.1 6.0 6.0 5.8 5.9 5.7 6.1 6.8 5.4 5.2 5.7 5.7 5.8Specific Conductivity (μS/cm) -- 109.0 78.0 1,450.0 660.0177.0 103.0 2,340.0 123.0 158.0 126.0138.0 259.0 122.0 85.0 387.0 155.0Temperature (°C) -- 19.7 17.9 19.4 15.7 18.5 18.318.7 14.6 18.5 18.8 18.114.9 17.4 19.1 19.4 15.6Turbidity (NTU) -- 5.2 1.2 63.1 33.1 9.8 9.3 50.7 38.4 12.6 5.2 10.4 63.1 9.8 14.2 41.0 6.5Field Test Kits (mg/L)Hydrogen Peroxide --Not Valid5Not Valid5Not Measured Not MeasuredNot Valid5Not Valid5Not Measured Not Measured Not Valid Not Valid Not Measured Not Measured Not Valid Not Valid Not Measured Not MeasuredIron -- 0.9 5.7 Not Measured Not Measured 8.4 2.3 Not Measured Not Measured 17.4 12.7 Not Measured Not Measured 11.7 4.4 Not Measured Not MeasuredPermanganate -- Not Analyzed 0 Visibly Purple Visibly Light Purple Not Analyzed 0 Visibly Purple Visibly Purple Not Measured 0 Not MeasuredVisibly Light Pink Not Measured 0 Visibly Purple 0.4Semivolatile Organic Compounds (µg/L)(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U1,1-Biphenyl 400 140 130 140 J, QC-2 180 100 80 110 J, QC-2 140 110 84 96 J, QC-2 120 140 150 120 J, QC-2 1101,4-Dioxane -- 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2.1 U 2 U 2.1 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2.1 U 2 U1-Methylnaphthalene -- 430 420 J, QL-2 220 J, QL-2 330 310 260 J, QL-2120 J, QL-2 380 420 420 J, QL-2 540 J,QL-2 560 450 540 J, QL-2 250 J, QL-2 3702,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 U, J, QS-32,4,5-Trichlorophenol -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 U, J, QS-32,4,6-Trichlorophenol -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 U, J, QS-32,4-Dichlorophenol -- 10 U 10 U 500 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 210 U 5 U, J, QS-32,4-Dimethylphenol -- 10 U 10 U 500 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 20 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 210 U 5 U2,4-Dinitrophenol -- 20 U 20 U 20 U 10 U 20 U 20 U 20 U 10 U 21 U 10 U 21 U 10 U 20 U 20 U 21 U 10 U2,4-Dinitrotoluene -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 U2,6-Dinitrotoluene -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 U2-Chloronaphthalene -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 U2-Chlorophenol -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 U2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U2-Methylnaphthalene 30 980 830 450 730 730 480 230 1,000 810 760 1,000 1,100 1,000 1,100 580 8002-Methylphenol -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U2-Nitroaniline -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 U2-Nitrophenol -- 10 U 10 U 500 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 210 U 5 U3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U3-Nitroaniline -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 U4-Chloro-3-methylphenol -- 10 U 10 U 500 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 210 U 5 U, J, QS-34-Chloroaniline -- 10 U 10 U 500 U, J, QC-1 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 210 U, J, QC-1 10 U4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 U4-Nitroaniline -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U4-Nitrophenol -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 UAcenaphthene 1,736 690 510 50 27 450 410 9.5 460 470 470 590 520 670 710 130 210Acenaphthylene -- 4.2 3.4 3.2 5 U 5.9 4 2 U 13 2.1 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 U 5.4 4.1 4.2 12Acetophenone -- 10 U 10 U 7.4 J, Q-2 6.1 J, CLP01 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 3.8 J, CLP01 9.9 U 10 U 4.8 J, Q-2 2.6 J, CLP01Anthracene -- 1 J, Q-2 2 U 2 U 5 U 5.3 1.4 J, Q-2 2 U 2.3 J, CLP01 3.7 3.3 3.9 1.9 J, CLP01 7.4 5 2.1 U 7.2Atrazine -- 10 U10 U, J, QL-1, QR-19.9 U, J, QL-1, QR-1, QC-110 U 10 U10 U, J, QL-1, QR-110 U, J, QL-1, QR-1, QC-110 U 11 U10 U, J, QL-2, QR -110 U, J, QL-1, QR-1, QC-110 U 9.9 U10 U, J, QL-1, QR-110 U, J, QL-1, QR-1, QC-110 UBenzaldehyde -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U, J, CLP16, QC-3 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U, J, CLP16, QC-3 11 U 10 U 10 U10 U, J, CLP16, QC-39.9 U 10 U 10 U10 U, J, CLP16, QC-3Analyte NameMW-2MW-57 MW-58MW-623-33 ft bgs23-33 ft bgs 23-33 ft bgs17-27 ft bgsPage 1 of 2
Table 4.1 (Continued)Performance Monitoring Sampling Results: Field Parameters, Field Tests, and SVOCsIn Situ Chemical Oxidation Pilot Test ReportHolcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North CarolinaMonitoring WellScreen Groundwater Cleanup Levels1 7/28/2021(Baseline)9/14/2021 (2 Weeks Post-MFR)210/13/2021 (1 Month Post-Permanganate )312/7/2021 (3 Months Post-Permanganate )47/28/2021(Baseline)9/14/2021 (2 Weeks Post-MFR )210/14/2021 (1 Month Post-Permanganate )312/7/2021 (3 Months Post-Permanganate )47/28/2021(Baseline)9/14/2021 (2 Weeks Post-MFR )210/13/2021 (1 Month Post-Permanganate)312/7/2021 (3 Months Post-Permanganate)47/28/2021(Baseline)9/14/2021 (2 Weeks Post-MFR)210/14/2021 (1 Month Post-Permanganate)312/7/2021 (3 Months Post-Permanganate) 4Analyte NameMW-2MW-57 MW-58MW-623-33 ft bgs23-33 ft bgs 23-33 ft bgs17-27 ft bgsSemivolatile Organic Compounds (continued)Benzo(a)anthracene -- 2 U 2 U 2 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 5 U 2.1 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 UBenzo(a)pyrene -- 2 U 2 U 2 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 5 U 2.1 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 UBenzo(b)fluoranthene -- 2 U 2 U 2 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 5 U 2.1 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 UBenzo(g,h,i)perylene -- 2 U 2 U 2 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 5 U 2.1 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 UBenzo(k)fluoranthene -- 2 U 2 U 2 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 5 U 2.1 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 UBenzyl alcohol -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U Not Analyzed 10 U 10 U 10 U Not Analyzed 11 U 10 U 10 U Not Analyzed 9.9 U 10 U 10 U Not AnalyzedBenzyl butyl phthalate -- 10 U,J,QL-3 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U, J, QL-3 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U, J, QL-3 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U, J, QL-3 10 U 10 U 5 UBis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 UBis(2-chloroethoxy)methane -- 10 U 10 U 500 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 210 U 5 UBis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 UBis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 UCaprolactam -- 10 U 10 U 500 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 210 U 10 UCarbazole -- 220 240 8.3 18 130 130 2 130 140 170 150 110 420 430 13 200Chrysene -- 2 U 2 U 2 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 5 U 2.1 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 UDibenz(a,h)anthracene -- 2 U 2 U 2 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 5 U 2.1 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 UDibenzofuran 28 360 320 260 290 250 230 240 380 260 240 280 290 350 370 220 240Diethyl phthalate -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 UDimethyl phthalate -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 UDi-n-butylphthalate -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 UDi-n-octylphthalate -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 UFluoranthene -- 2.7 1.8 J, Q-2 0.49 J, Q-2 5 U 7.6 2.6 0.73 J, Q-2 11 10 8.5 12 10 11 8.7 7.4 8.8Fluorene -- 150 120 4.6 J, QL-2 21 130 98 0.82 J, QL-2, Q-2 160 190 160 190 J, QL-2 200 230 240 56 J, QL-2 140Hexachlorobenzene -- 10 U, J, QL-3 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U, J, QL-3 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U, J, QL-3 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U, J, QL-3 10 U 10 U 5 UHexachlorocyclopentadiene -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 UHexachloroethane -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 UIndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene -- 2 U 2 U 2 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 5 U 2.1 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 U 2 U 2 U 2.1 U 5 UIsophorone -- 10 10 U 500 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 210 U 5 UNaphthalene 6 11,000 8,800 5,800 7,500 6,600 5,200 3,000 7,600 5,100 5,000 2,800 3,800 14,000 13,000 9,200 14,000Nitrobenzene -- 10U 10 U 500 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 210 U 5 Un-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 Un-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 5 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 5 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 5 UPentachlorophenol -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 11 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U, J, QS-3Phenanthrene -- 120 120 3.5 22 110 77 0.53 J, Q-2 180 210 180 220 200 170 190 51 100Phenol -- 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 1.4 J, CLP01 11 U 10 U 10 U 10 U 9.9 U 10 U 10 U 10 UPyrene -- 1.2 J, Q-2 0.76 J, Q-2 2 U 5 U 4.2 1.4 J, Q-2 2 U 5.1 5.6 4.3 5.4 4.2 J, CLP01 6.7 5.7 2.1 U 4.7 J, CLP01Notes:1 U.S. Enviornmental Protection Agency, 2018. Record of Decision for Holcomb Creosote Company Superfund Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North CarolinaQualifier Definitions:2 This occurred approximately 12 days after the second round of MFR injections and before the sodium permanganate injections.J = Identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.3 This occurred approximately 1 month after the sodium permanganate injections.U = Analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit.4 This occurred approximately 3 months after the sodium permanganate injections.Q-2 = Result is greater than MDL but less than MRL.5Results Not Valid indicates that the hydrogen peroxide field test did not produce results that were reliable. It is likely that field interference impacted the results.QC-1 = Analyte concentration low in continuing calibration verification standard.Only detected compounds are includedQC-2 = Analyte concentration high in continuing calibration verification standard. -- = not established MDL = method detection limitQC-3 = Analyte calibration criteria not met.°C = degree Celsius MRL = method reporting limitQL-1 = Laboratory control spike recovery is less than method control limits.μg/L = microgram per liter MFR = modified Fenton's reagentQL-2 = Laboratory control spike recovery is greater than method control limits.μS/cm = microsiemens per centimeter NTU = nephelometric turbidity unitQL-3 = Laboratory control spike precision is outside method control limits.mg/L = milligram per liter ORP = oxidation reduction potentialQR-1 = MRL verification recovery is less than the lower control limits.mV = millivolt SVOC = semivolatile organice compoundQS-3 = Surrogate recovery is lower than established control limits.ft bgs = feet below ground surface S.U. = standard unitsCLP01 = Concentration reported is less than the lowest standard on calibration curve.Cleanup level exceededCLP15 = TIC results reported as identified by lab IDs not verified.CLP16 = Initial calibration response erratic.Page 2 of 2
Table 4.2Performance Monitoring Sampling Results: MetalsIn Situ Chemical Oxidation Pilot TestHolcomb Creosote Company Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North CarolinaMonitoring WellScreen Interval Groundwater Cleanup Levels1 7/28/2021(Baseline)9/14/2021 (2 Weeks Post-MFR)210/13/2021 (1 Month Post-Permanganate)312/7/2021 (3 Months Post-Permanganate)47/28/2021(Baseline)9/14/2021 (2 Weeks Post-MFR)210/14/2021 (1 Month Post-Permanganate)312/7/2021 (3 Months Post-Permanganate)47/28/2021(Baseline)9/14/2021 (2 Weeks Post-MFR)210/13/2021 (1 Month Post-Permanganate)312/7/2021 (3 Months Post-Permanganate)47/28/2021(Baseline)9/14/2021 (2 Weeks Post-MFR)210/14/2021 (1 Month Post-Permanganate) 312/7/2021 (3 Months Post-Permanganate)4Metals (µg/L)Aluminum (Total) -- -- 200 U 200 U 51 J, Q-2 -- 200 U 200 U 440 -- 200 U 280 140 J, Q-2 -- 200 U 200 U 25 J, Q-2Aluminum (Dissolved) -- -- 200 U 200 U 19 J, Q-2 -- 200 U 200 U 200 U -- 200 U 200 U 200 U -- 200 U 200 U 200 UAntimony (Total) -- -- 60 U 60 U 60 U -- 60 U 60 U 60 U -- 60 U 60 U 60 U -- 60 U 60 U 60 UAntimony (Dissolved) -- -- 60 U 60 U 60 U -- 60 U 60 U 60 U -- 60 U 60 U 60 U -- 60 U 60 U 60 UArsenic (Total) -- -- 10 U 7.3 J, CLP36, Q-2 16 CLP36 -- 10 U 22 CLP36 10 U -- 10 U 10 U 7.2 J, CLP36, Q-2 -- 10 U 10 U 13 J, CLP36, QM-4Arsenic (Dissolved) -- -- 10 U 8.2 J, CLP36, Q-2 10 U -- 10 U 22 CLP36 10 U -- 10 U 10 U 10 U -- 10 U 10 U 10 UBarium (Total) -- -- 62 J, Q-2 710 82 J, Q-2 -- 98 J, Q-2 1,500 1,500 -- 58 J, Q-2 69 J, Q-2 160 J, Q-2 -- 120 J, Q-2 200 U 89 J, Q-2Barium (Dissolved) -- -- 61 J, Q-2 510 39 J, Q-2 -- 100 J, Q-2 1,300 32 J, Q-2 -- 59 J, Q-2 63 J, Q-2 50 J, Q-2 -- 110 J, Q-2 200 U 91 J, Q-2Beryllium (Total) -- -- 5 U 5 U 5 U -- 5 U 5 U 5 U -- 5 U 5 U 5 U -- 5 U 5 U 5 UBeryllium (Dissolved) -- -- 5 U 5 U 5 U -- 5 U 5 U 5 U -- 5 U 5 U 5 U -- 5 U 5 U 5 UCadmium (Total) -- -- 5 U 5 U 5 U -- 5 U 2.8 J, Q-2 5 U -- 5 U 5 U 5 U -- 5 U 5 U 5 UCadmium (Dissolved) -- -- 5 U 1.2 J, Q-2 5 U -- 5 U 2.8 J, Q-2 5 U -- 5 U 5 U 5 U -- 5 U 5 U 5 UCalcium (Total) -- -- 6,300 150,000 75,000 -- 8,400 160,000 11,000 -- 5,400 6,300 31,000 -- 2,300 J, Q-2 2,500 J, Q-2 1,500 J, Q-2Calcium (Dissolved) -- -- 6,300 160,000 82,000 -- 9,000 160,000 6,800 -- 5,500 6,300 31,000 -- 2,300 J, Q-2 2,200 J, Q-2 1,600 J, Q-2Chromium (Total) -- -- 10 U 150 J, CLP26 130 -- 10 U 370 J, CLP26 15 -- 10 U 10 U 9.5 J, Q-2 -- 10 U 61 J, CLP26 64Chromium (Dissolved) -- -- 10 U 160 J, CLP26 150 -- 10 U 390 J, CLP26 8.9 J, Q-2 -- 10 U 10 U 10 -- 10 U 62 J, CLP26 46Cobalt (Total) -- -- 50 U 50 U 50 U -- 50 U 50 U 10 J, Q-2 -- 16 J, Q-2 19 J, Q-2 17 J, Q-2 -- 50 U 50 U 6.9 J, Q-2Cobalt (Dissolved) 9 -- 50 U 50 U 50 U -- 50 U 50 U 50 U -- 15 J, Q-2 19 J, Q-2 50 U -- 50 U 50 U 7.1 J, Q-2Copper (Total) -- -- 25 U 25 U 25 U -- 25 U 25 U 25 U -- 25 U 25 U 2.8 J, Q-2 -- 25 U 25 U 9.7 J, Q-2Copper (Dissolved) -- -- 25 U 25 U 25 U -- 25 U 25 U 25 U -- 25 U 25 U 25 U -- 25 U 25 U 25 UIron (Total) -- 1,600 900 100 U 100 U 15,000 2,600 100 U 4,600 16,000 13,000 15,000 16,000 11,000 5,400 100 U 3,600Iron (Dissolved) 20,256 1,200 850 100 U 100 U 14,000 2,500 100 U 100 U 15,000 13,000 15,000 100 U 12,000 CR 5,100 100 U 3,200Lead (Total) -- -- 10 U 31 12 -- 10 U 77 19 -- 10 U 10 U 14 -- 10 U 10 U 11Lead (Dissolved) -- -- 10 U 34 12 U, B-4 -- 10 U 78 16 U, B-4 -- 10 U 10 U 12 U, B-4 -- 10 U 10 U 12 U, B-4Magnesium (Total) -- -- 1,400 J, Q-2 39,000 21,000 -- 2,300 J, Q-2 38,000 2,000 J, Q-2 -- 1,300 J, Q-2 1,800 J, Q-2 9,100 -- 950 J, Q-2 1,300 J, Q-2 600 J, Q-2Magnesium (Dissolved) -- -- 1,400 J, Q-2 40,000 23,000 -- 2,400 J, Q-2 39,000 1,700 J, Q-2 -- 1,400 J, Q-2 1,700 J, Q-2 9,400 -- 910 J, Q-2 1,200 J, Q-2 600 J, Q-2Manganese (Total) -- 1,100 820 330,000 15,000 1,700 1,700 840,000 33,000 2,900 2,700 3,600 16,000 3,000 1,800 4,600 2,400Manganese (Dissolved) 694 1,100 880 360,000 750 1,700 1,800 840,000 440 2,900 2,900 3,500 13,000 3,100 CR 1,900 19,000 2,600Nickel (Total) -- -- 40 U 32 J, Q-2 1.9 J, Q-2 -- 40 U 79 6.3 J, Q-2 -- 40 U 40 U 8.8 J, Q-2 -- 40 U 40 U 75Nickel (Dissolved) -- -- 40 U 34 J, Q-2 40 U -- 40 U 81 40 U -- 40 U 40 U 5.1 J, Q-2 -- 40 U 40 U 90Potassium (Total) -- -- 1,600 J, Q-2 5,700 5,000 -- 2,300 J, Q-2 11,000 1,600 J, Q-2 -- 2,500 J, Q-2 2,900 J, Q-2 3,200 J, Q-2 -- 1600 J, Q-2 3400 J, Q-2 690 J, Q-2Potassium (Dissolved) -- -- 1,500 J, Q-2 5,700 4,900 J, Q-2 -- 2,400 J, Q-2 11,000 1,100 J, Q-2 -- 2,500 J, Q-2 2,700 J, Q-2 3,000 J, Q-2 -- 1600 J, Q-2 3300 J, Q-2 630 J, Q-2Selenium (Total) -- -- 35 U 170 CLP36 35 U, J, CLP25 -- 35 U 410 CLP36 35 U, J, CLP25 -- 35 U 35 U 35 U, J, CLP25 -- 35 U 35 U 35 U, J, CLP25Selenium (Dissolved) -- -- 35 U 180 CLP36 35 U, J, CLP25 -- 35 U 420 CLP36 35 U, J, CLP25 -- 35 U 35 U 14 J, CLP36, Q-2 -- 35 U 13 J, CLP36, Q-2 35 U, J, CLP25Silver (Total) -- -- 10 U 78 10 U -- 10 U 200 10 U -- 10 U 10 U 10 U -- 10 U 10 U 10 USilver (Dissolved) -- -- 10 U 83 10 U -- 10 U 200 10 U -- 10 U 10 U 10 U -- 10 U 4.9 J, Q-2 10 USodium (Total) -- -- 7,400 98,000 130,000 -- 7,300 370,000 18,000 -- 7,600 8,600 19,000 -- 8,300 93,000 28,000Sodium (Dissolved) -- -- 7,300 100,000 130,000 -- 7,800 380,000 17,000 -- 7,900 8,600 19,000 -- 8,200 92,000 27,000Thallium (Total) -- -- 25 U130 CLP36 25 U -- 25 U 320 CLP36 25 U -- 25 U 25 U 25 U -- 25 U 25 U 25 UThallium (Dissolved) -- -- 25 U140 CLP36 25 U -- 25 U 340 CLP36 25 U -- 25 U 25 U 25 U -- 25 U 7.4 J, CLP36, Q-2 25 UVanadium (Total) -- -- 50 U 50 U 11 J, Q-2 -- 50 U 50 U 29 J, Q-2 -- 50 U 50 U 14 J, Q-2 -- 50 U 50 U 50 UVanadium (Dissolved) -- -- 50 U 50 U 50 U -- 50 U 50 U 50 U -- 50 U 50 U 13 J, Q-2 -- 50 U 50 U 50 UZinc (Total) -- -- 60 U 53 J, Q-2 64 -- 60 U 63 13 J, Q-2 -- 60 U 60 U 62 -- 60 U 60 U 15 J, Q-2Zinc (Dissolved) --‐‐60 U 41 J, Q-2 17 J, Q-2‐‐60 U 47 J, Q-2 60 U‐‐60 U 60 U 60 U‐‐60 U 22 J, Q-2 19 J, Q-2Notes:1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2018. Record of Decision for Holcomb Creosote Company Superfund Site, Yadkinville, Yadkin County, North CarolinaQualifier Definitions:2 This occurred approximately 12 days after the second round of MFR injections and before the sodium permanganate injectionsU = Analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit.3 This occurred approximately 1 month after the sodium permanganate injectionsB4 = Level in blank impacts MRLs.4 This occurred approximately 3 months after the sodium permanganate injectionsCLP25 = PE sample recover scored as warning-low.μg/L = microgram per literCLP36 = Identification/Concentration of analyte not confirmed by ICP-MS. -- = not established for groundwater cleanup level / not analyzed for resultsJ = Identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.ft bgs = feet below ground surfaceQ-2 = Result greater than MDL but less than MRL.MFR = Modified Fenton's ReagentCR = Dissolved > total; RPD is within method allowed precision.Cleanup level exceededAnalyte NameMW-57 MW-58 MW-2 MW-623-33 ft bgs 23-33 ft bgs 23-33 ft bgs 17-27 ft bgsPage 1 of 1

FIGURES
Dobbins
Pond
Figure 1.1
Site Location
Legend
HGL—ISCO Pilot Test ReportHolcomb Creosote Site—Yadkinville, North Carolina
0 450 900225
Feet
\\aro-01\prj1$\H\HGL\Holcomb Creosote\GIS\aprx\Holcomb_Creosote\Holcomb_Creosote.mxd8/11/2021 JGSource: HGL, JMWaller, Versar ArcGIS Online USGS National Map
!U
^_
Holcomb
Creosote Site
NORTH
CAROLINA
General Location
Holcomb Creosote Property Boundary
Former Holcomb Creosote Operations Area
DDDDDDDDDDDDD
D DDDD
D
DDDDDDDDDD D
D DDDDDDDDDDD£¤601
Land FarmArea Boundary
Drip Pad(removed)
Storage
Office
Treatment Vessel(removed)
Distillation Evaporator(removed)
FormerDrum Storage Area
Concrete Pit(removed)
Creosote Work Tank(removed)
Creosote Storage Tank(removed)Gasoline UST(removed)
Steel Settling Tank(removed)
Overflow CreosoteStorage Tank(removed)
Diesel Tank(removed)
Un
a
m
e
d

T
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y
Figure 1.2Site Facility Plan
Legend
HGL—ISCO Pilo t Test Rep o rtHo lco m b Creo so te Site—Yadkinville, No rth Caro lina
0 80 16040
Feet
³\\aro -01\p rj1$\H\HGL\Ho lco m b Creo so te\GIS\m xd\(2-01)Site_ Facility_ Plan.m xd1/21/2022 JG So urce: HGL, JMWaller, Versar ArcGIS Online Im agery (Clarity)
Note:UST=underground storage tank
FenceD
Surface Water Course
Wetlands
Site Boundary
Landfarm (closed)
Surface Impoundment
Existing Structure
Former Structure
Former Holcomb Creosote Operations Area
DDDDD DD DD D
D DDD
D
DDDD D
D
D D DDD D DD D D D
"´"´
"´"´"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
Dobbins Pond
£¤601
MW-1ANM
U
n
a
m
e
d

T
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y
MW-X857.37
MW-8858.09
MW-7
857.24
MW-6
860.16
MW-5855.17
MW-4858.04
MW-3
858.71
MW-43857.59
MW-39
854.08
MW-37854.87
MW-35858.45
MW-34861.15
MW-33865.43
MW-32864.27
MW-31864.33
MW-30
861.23
MW-28
861.79
MW-27
861.82
MW-25
864.85
MW-24865.55
MW-23868.94
MW-22865.81
MW-21867.27 MW-20863.84
MW-19863.55
MW-17860.90
MW-15
855.87
MW-1B869.44
Production
NM
864862860866858868856864862860866858868
856
Figure 1.3A
February 2020
Saprolite Groundwater
Elevation Contours
Legend
HGL—ISCO Pilot Test ReportHolcomb Creosote Site—Yadkinville, North Carolina
0 90 18045
Feet
\\aro-01\prj1$\H\HGL\Holcomb Creosote\GIS\aprx\Holcomb_Creosote\Holcomb_Creosote.mxd8/11/2021 RRSource: HGL, Versar, JMWaller ArcGIS Online Imagery (Clarity)
EDW
"´
"´
Saprolite Monitoring Well"´
858.45 Groundwater Elevation (ft NAVD88)
Surface Water Course
Landfarm (closed)
Wetlands
Former Holcomb Creosote Operations Area
Notes:
ft=feet
NAVD88=North American Vertical Datum of 1988
NM=not measured
February 2020 Saprolite GroundwaterElevation Contour (ft NAVD88)856
FenceD
Surface Impoundment (closed)
DDDDD DD DD D
D DDD
D
DDDD DDD D DDD D DD D D D
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´"´
"´
"´
"´
Dobbins Pond
£¤601
U
n
a
m
e
d

T
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y
MW-46859.08
MW-44
857.12
MW-41851.94
MW-40
854.06
MW-36854.45
MW-29861.85
MW-26
862.06
MW-18864.74
MW-16
855.76
MW-14855.03
MW-13855.62
MW-12855.33
MW-11856.39
MW-2
859.98
854856858860862864
852854856858860862864852Figure 1.3B
February 2020
Partially Weathered Rock
Groundwater Elevation Contours
Legend
HGL—ISCO Pilot Test ReportHolcomb Creosote Site—Yadkinville, North Carolina
0 90 18045
Feet
\\aro-01\prj1$\H\HGL\Holcomb Creosote\GIS\aprx\Holcomb_Creosote\Holcomb_Creosote.mxd8/11/2021 RRSource: HGL, Versar, JMWaller ArcGIS Online Imagery (Clarity)
EDW
PWR Monitoring Well"´
"´851.94 Groundwater Elevation (ft NAVD88)
Surface Water Course
FenceD
Landfarm (closed)
Wetlands
Surface Impoundment (closed)
Former Holcomb Creosote Operations Area
Notes:
ft=feet
NAVD88=North American Vertical Datum of 1988
PWR=partially weathered rock
February 2020 PWR GroundwaterElevation Contour (ft NAVD88)856
DDDDD DD DD D
D DDD
D
DDDD D
D
D D DDD D DD D D D
"´
"´
"´"´
"´"´"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
Dobbins Pond
£¤601
MW-48
861.21
MW-47
859.22
MW-1ANM U
n
a
m
e
d

T
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y
MW-X857.11
MW-8857.75
MW-7
857.15
MW-6
859.84
MW-5855.24
MW-4857.75
MW-3
859.07
MW-43857.41
MW-39
854.02
MW-37854.80
MW-35858.13
MW-34860.88
MW-33864.65
MW-32862.83
MW-31863.91
MW-30
860.86
MW-28
861.77
MW-27
861.62
MW-25
864.67
MW-24865.44
MW-23NM
MW-22865.79
MW-21867.36 MW-20863.91
MW-19863.59
MW-17860.63
MW-15
855.80
MW-1B869.67
Production
NM
864862860866858868856864862860866858868856
Figure 1.3C
March 2020
Saprolite Groundwater
Elevation Contours
Legend
HGL—ISCO Pilot Test ReportHolcomb Creosote Site—Yadkinville, North Carolina
0 90 18045
Feet
\\aro-01\prj1$\H\HGL\Holcomb Creosote\GIS\aprx\Holcomb_Creosote\Holcomb_Creosote.mxd8/11/2021 RRSource: HGL, Versar, JMWaller ArcGIS Online Imagery (Clarity)
EDW
"´
"´
Saprolite Monitoring Well"´
Surface Water Course
Landfarm (closed)
Wetlands
Former Holcomb Creosote Operations Area
Notes:
ft=feet
NAVD88=North American Vertical Datum of 1988
NM=not measured
March 2020 Saprolite GroundwaterElevation Contour (ft NAVD88)856
FenceD
858.13 Groundwater Elevation (ft NAVD88)
Surface Impoundment (closed)
DDDDD DD DD D
D DDD
D
DDDD DDD D DDD D DD D D D
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
"´
Dobbins Pond
£¤601
MW-49
860.80
MW-50
864.82
MW-52
863.27
MW-51
860.72
TMW-54*
858.86
MW-53
863.51
U
n
a
m
e
d

T
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y
MW-46858.57
MW-44
856.93
MW-41851.91
MW-40
854.02
MW-36854.41
MW-29861.00
MW-26
861.95
MW-18864.87
MW-16
855.66
MW-14854.69
MW-13NM
MW-12854.89
MW-11855.67
MW-2
859.81
854856858860862864852854856858860862864852Figure 1.3D
March 2020
Partially Weathered Rock
Groundwater Elevation Contours
Legend
HGL—ISCO Pilot Test ReportHolcomb Creosote Site—Yadkinville, North Carolina
0 90 18045
Feet
\\aro-01\prj1$\H\HGL\Holcomb Creosote\GIS\aprx\Holcomb_Creosote\Holcomb_Creosote.mxd8/11/2021 RRSource: HGL, Versar, JMWaller ArcGIS Online Imagery (Clarity)
EDW
PWR Monitoring Well"´
Surface Water Course
FenceD
Landfarm (closed)
Wetlands
Surface Impoundment (closed)
Former Holcomb Creosote Operations Area
Notes:
*=temporary well
ft=feet
NAVD88=North American Vertical Datum of 1988
NM=not measured
PWR=partially weathered rock
March 2020 PWR GroundwaterElevation Contour (ft NAVD88)856
851.91 Groundwater Elevation (ft NAVD88)
DDDDDD

D

D
D D D D D D D D DDDDDDDDDDDDD D D D D D D D
D

D

D

D

D
DD D D D D}} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }}
}}

}
}

}
}

}
}

}
}

}
}

}
}

}
}

}
}}} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }}}} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }}}} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }} }}
}}

}
}

}
}

}
}

}
}

}
}

}
}

}
}

}
}

}
}}} }} }}
}
}
}}
}}
}}
}}

}
}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
!'
!'
!'
!'
!'
!'
!'
)"!'
!'
!')"!'
!'
!'
)"!'
)"!'
INJ-3
INJ-1
INJ-2 DPT-13
MW-57
MW-58
INJ-4
MW-9
MW-8
MW-7
MW-6
MW-4
MW-3
MW-2
MW-43
MW-34
MW-17
MW-10
MW-49
MW-48
Figure 3.1
ISCO Pilot Test Injection Locations
and Monitoring Well Layout
0 15 307.5
Feet
\\aro-01\prj1$\H\HGL\Holcomb Creosote\GIS\aprx\Holcomb_Creosote\Holcomb_Creosote.mxd1/20/2022 RRSource: HGL, Versar ArcGIS Online Imagery (Clarity)
HGL— ISCO Pilot Test ReportHolcomb Creosote Site—Yadkinville, North Carolina
Notes:
1. ROI indicates radius of influence
2. PWR indicates partially weatherd rock
3. ISCO indicates in situ chemical oxidation
4. DPT indicates direct push technology
5. µg/L indicates microgram per literDDDDDDDD
D
D0 150 30075
Feet
Legend!'Saprolite Monitoring Well
!'PWR Monitoring Well
!'Bedrock Monitoring Well
)"!'ISCO Pilot Test Performance
Monitoring
Approximate GW Flow Direction - Saprolite
Approximate GW Flow Direction - PWR
Saprolite February/March 2020 Extent
of Naphthalene (Greater than 6 µg/L)
D Fence
Lagoon
Landfarm
Wetlands
Former Holocomb Creosote
Operations Area
PWR February/March 2020 Extent
of Napthalene (Greater than 6 µg/L)
Saprolite DPT Injection Location
(assumed ROI of 6 feet)
PWR Injection Well Location
(assumed ROI of 6 feet)
!'ISCO Pilot Test PWR Performance
Monitoring Well (Installed July 2021)
Surface Water Course
Notes:µg/L - micrograms per litermg/L - milligrams per literPWR - Partially Weathered Rocks1 This occurred after the second round of MFR injections and before the sodium permanganate injections2 This occurred after the sodium permanganate injectionsPerformance Monitoring Target Compounds Results - MW-57PWR Zone - Holcomb Creosote SiteMarch 2022Figure 4.1690510502711,0008,8005,8007,500140130140180980830450730360320260290-505015025035045055065075085002,0004,0006,0008,00010,00012,000Baseline 2-Week Post-MFR Injection 1-Month Post-Permanganate Injection3-Month Post-Permanganate InjectionOxidation Reduction Potential (mV)Target Compound Concentration (μg/L)AcenaphtheneNaphthalene1,1-Biphenyl2-MethylnaphthaleneDibenzofuranOxidation Reduction Potential (ORP)122
Notes:µg/L - micrograms per litermg/L - milligrams per literPWR - Partially Weathered Rocks1 This occurred after the second round of MFR injections and before the sodium permanganate injections2 This occurred after the sodium permanganate injectionsPerformance Monitoring Target Compounds Results - MW-58PWR Zone - Holcomb Creosote SiteMarch 2022Figure 4.24504109.54606,6005,2003,0007,600100801101407304802301,000250230240380-150-505015025035045055065002,0004,0006,0008,00010,00012,000Baseline 2-Week Post-MFR Injection 1-Month Post-Permanganate Injection3-Month Post-Permanganate InjectionOxidation Reduction Potential (mV)Target Compound Concentration (μg/L)AcenaphtheneNaphthalene1,1-Biphenyl2-MethylnaphthaleneDibenzofuranOxidation Reduction Potential (ORP)122
Notes:µg/L - micrograms per litermg/L - milligrams per literPWR - Partially Weathered Rocks1 This occurred after the second round of MFR injections and before the sodium permanganate injections2 This occurred after the sodium permanganate injectionsPerformance Monitoring Target Compounds Results - MW-2PWR Zone - Holcomb Creosote SiteMarch 2022Figure 4.34704705905205,1005,0002,8003,80011084961208107601,0001,100260240280290-505015025035045055065075085002,0004,0006,0008,00010,00012,000Baseline 2-Week Post-MFR Injection 1-Month Post-Permanganate Injection3-Month Post-Permanganate InjectionOxidation Reduction Potential (mV)Target Compound Concentration (μg/L)AcenaphtheneNaphthalene1,1-Biphenyl2-MethylnaphthaleneDibenzofuranOxidation Reduction Potential (ORP)122
Notes:µg/L - micrograms per litermg/L - milligrams per liter1 This occurred after the second round of MFR injections and before the sodium permanganate injections2 This occurred after the sodium permanganate injectionsPerformance Monitoring Target Compounds Results - MW-6Saprolite Zone - Holcomb Creosote SiteMarch 2022Figure 4.467071013021014,00013,0009,20014,0001401501201101,0001,100580800350370220240010020030040050060002,0004,0006,0008,00010,00012,00014,00016,000Baseline 2-Week Post-MFR Injection 1-Month Post-Permanganate Injection3-Month Post-Permanganate InjectionOxidation Reduction Potential (mV)Target Compound Concentration (μg/L)AcenaphtheneNaphthalene1,1-Biphenyl2-MethylnaphthaleneDibenzofuranOxidation Reduction Potential (ORP)122
Notes:% - percent PWR - Partially Weathered RockComparison of Week 2 Concentration Decrease to Pore Volume DisplacementPWR Zone - Holcomb Creosote SiteMarch 2022Figure 4.50%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%Naphthalene Acenaphthene 2-Methylnaphthalene Dibenzofuran 1,1-BiphenylPercent Concentration DecreaseMW-57MW-58Pore volume displacement = 15%
Notes:% - percent PWR - Partially Weathered RockNo concentration decrease was observed for dibenzofuran in MW-58 and for 1,1-biphenyl in both MW-57 and MW-58Comparison of Week 2 to Month 1 Concentration Decrease to Pore Volume DisplacementPWR Zone - Holcomb Creosote SiteMarch 2022Figure 4.60%20%40%60%80%100%120%Naphthalene Acenaphthene 2-Methylnaphthalene Dibenzofuran 1,1-BiphenylPercent Concentration DecreaseMW-57MW-58Pore volume displacement = 24%

APPENDIX A

WELL INSTALL AND SAMPLING FIELD FORMS

APPENDIX B

ISCO INJECTION FORMS AND LOGS

Field Summary Report for Holcomb Creosote Company
in Yadkinville, North Carolina

Summary of Events for Holcomb Creosote Company MFR injections

Redox Tech was tasked with injecting into 4 wells (INJ-01, INJ-02, INJ-03, and INJ-04) located at the former
Holcomb Creosote Company in Yadkinville, NC. Each well was screened from 33-23 ft bgs and had glued on
2” PVC pipe to NPT thread adapters. This was supposed to be a two-event project separated by roughly 2
weeks.

Redox Tech mobilized to the site on August 18th, and accepted forklift and air compressor rentals, along with
chemicals for the first event. Redox Tech also had a 4,000-gallon pillow tank that was filled up via a large
water tanker for use on the project.

Redox Tech used a 250-gallon IBC tote to mix the chemicals together. Water was first pumped from the pillow
tank to the IBC tote, and then 34% wt hydrogen peroxide was added by using the forklift on site to lift the
hydrogen peroxide tote above the mixing tote then drain the required volume through a 2” cam lock hose that
was fed into the top of the mixing tote, by visually looking at the marks on the front of the tote to indicate the
volume remaining in the hydrogen peroxide tote. The first batch was mixed to the original scope of the project,
for 8.4% solution of hydrogen peroxide. The mix tote held 184 gallons of water, and then 54 gallons of 34 wt%
hydrogen peroxide was added as well as 2 lbs of sodium citrate to create the 8.4% solution. Once mixed, the
solution was then pumped into individual wells using a 2” ARO double diaphragm pump. By adjusting the air
Prepared by Zachary Poole on September 9th, 2021
Field Contractor Redox Tech, LLC Client HGL/Geosyntec
Field Lead Zachary Poole Field Lead Mike Burcham
Phone Number 919-920-3641 Phone Number 321-960-9789
Email Address poole@redox-
tech.com
Email Address [e-mail]
m
Start Date August 18th, 2021 End Date September 2nd, 2021
Chemical MFR (Hydrogen Peroxide at 8.4% wt solution, followed by ferrous
sulfate injection)
Injection Points 4 wells screened from 23-33 ft bgs.

pressure to the pump using a regulator, we were able to control the injection flow rate. An inline pressure gauge
allowed us to determine and regulate injection pressure going into the well.

INJ-02 was the first well to receive the amendment. We first injected ~15 gallons of water and then followed
that immediately with the hydrogen peroxide solution. Injections started off as slowly as possible by keeping
the air pressure regulator on the pump as low as possible yet allowing the pump to operate. From initially slow
flow rates, the air pressure regulator was increased until a flow rate of ~0.9 gallons per minute was achieved,
and at this observed flow rate, the observed injection pressures for this well were relatively high (around 40-45
psi). Injections continued at INJ-02 for just over 2 hours, which received ~113 gallons of solution, before
switching to the next well, INJ-04. INJ-04 took ~40 gallons of solution before amendment surfaced at a point
between all the injection and monitoring wells. Final injection pressure was observed to be 40 psi, and the flow
rate was observed to be ~6.7 gallons per minute. INJ-01 took ~25 gallons of solution before it also surfaced at
the same location that INJ-04 surfaced at. The injection pressure observed at INJ-01 was 20 psi, and the flow
rate observed was ~3.6 gallons per minute. Finally INJ-03 received ~25 gallons of solution as well before it
surfaced around a nearby old monitoring well. The observed injection pressure for INJ-03 was 10 psi, with an
observed flow rate of ~1.6 gallons per minute. After observing injections in all four wells, it became apparent
that only INJ-02 was able to receive a reasonable amount of solution without surfacing. Since we had some
remaining solution left from the first batch of 8.4% wt solution that had been mixed up, the remaining solution
was injected into INJ-02, and then flushed with ~20 gallons of water at the end of the day. Refer to the attached
injection data for more detailed information.

The following day, the original plan was modified to test how the wells would do at half the concentration
(~4.2% wt) of the hydrogen peroxide solution. Injections began with the 4.2% wt hydrogen peroxide and 2 lbs
of sodium citrate into INJ-02 to complete the remaining volume that was initially set out in the scope, 238
gallons of hydrogen peroxide solution. The injection pressure at INJ-02 was observed to be about the same as
the day before, ~40-45 psi, and the observed flow rate was ~0.7 gallons per minute. INJ-02 then received ~10
gallons of flush water, and then followed up with 119 gallons of ferrous sulfate solution. The injection pressure
observed during this solution injection was 40 psi, and the flow rate was noticeably faster, as observed to be
~6.3 gallons per minute.

The rest of the day was spent testing the other three injection wells to see how they would respond to the lower
concentration of hydrogen peroxide. The three injection wells received nearly the same volumes into each well
before they surfaced again in the same locations as the day before. While injecting into INJ-04, it was observed

that the 4.2% wt solution had made its way around the MW-57 casing and filled the stick-up vault with the
bubbly peroxide solution. There was some solution remaining after testing the other 3 wells, and that volume
was injected into INJ-02 to get rid of all mixed peroxide solution. It was observed that this last injection into
INJ-02 was seen to have a faster flow rate of ~4.2 gallons per minute at an observed injection pressure of 10 psi.

This concluded the first injection event at the Holcomb Creosote Company. All rentals were called off rent, all
trash was collected and disposed of off-site, and all equipment was packed up except the pillow tank and one
tote of 34% hydrogen peroxide that had 100 gallons remaining in it, and the crew demobed on August 19th,
2021.

On August 27th, a conference call was held to discuss the next injection event at site, and it was decided to try a
0.5% wt hydrogen peroxide solution into each well and see if injections could be completed. The start of this
event would be to see if gravity feeding into the wells was a viable option, and if not, then switch to a pump.
Using a two-way manifold and injecting into two wells at the same time was also discussed to see if that had
any effect to get more product into the ground.

Redox Tech, Geosyntec, and HGL representatives mobilized back to site on September 2nd to try to get more
information about the site as discussed on the conference call on August 27th. Manifolded injections began in
INJ-01 and INJ-03 by gravity feeding water, and then following that by gravity feeding 0.5% wt hydrogen
peroxide solution. Injections into INJ-03 caused surfacing after ~38 gallons of solution in the same location as
the first event. INJ-01 took ~29 gallons of solution before it stalled. The diaphragm pump was then turned on to
continue injections. INJ-01 received ~42 gallons of solution before it surfaced in the same location as the first
event. Gravity feed injections were then started at INJ-04. After ~35 minutes, INJ-04 received ~29 gallons of
solution, and appeared to have slowed down significantly to a point where the flow rate was less than 0.2
gallons per minute. The pump was turned on to continue injections, and it was noticed that INJ-04 started to fill
up the vault again at MW-57. After injecting into INJ-01, INJ-03, and INJ-04 and realizing that the 0.5% wt
solution had little effect on whether we could get more solution into the ground, it was decided to inject the
remaining volume of 357 gallons as per the original scope of the project, into INJ-02. Injections were completed
with the diaphragm pump. The observed injection pressure was 20 psi, and the average flow rate for the well for
the entire volume was observed as ~2.5 gallons per minute. For more details regarding injections, please refer
to the attached spreadsheet that contains all injection data.

This concluded the second event of injections for the Holcomb Creosote Company site. All remaining chemical
and equipment was packed up and carried back to the Redox Tech’s shop in Cary. All trash was collected and
disposed of offsite. And all rental equipment was fueled up and called off rent. HGL, Geosyntec and Redox
Tech, personnel demobed from site on September 2nd, 2021

Figure 1. Location of Injection Wells located at the Holcomb Creosote Company

Figure 2. Pictures of Amendment Surfacing

Figure 2.A Surfacing from INJ-01, in center area of the wells

Figure 2.B MW-57 stick-up vault filling up with Amendment from INJ-04

Figure 2.C Surfacing in center area of wells from INJ-01 second time.

Figure 2.D Surfacing next to old monitoring well, around the casing, from INJ-03

Location:Chemical:
Date:Concentration:
Redox Tech Crew
Pump: Note Taker:
Date Injection
Point Depth Mix / Batch
Number Start Time Stop Time Injection Pressure
(PSI)Flow Rate GPM Planned Volume
Injected
Actual Volume
Injected Notes (flow change, etc.)
8/18/2021 INJ-02 23-33 1 11:31 11:34 35 5.0 15 15 flush water
8/18/2021 INJ-02 23-33 1 11:41 13:51 35 0.9 238 113
8.4% wt h2o2, ~2lbs sodium citrate, increased injection
pressure to 40 psi at 12:43, volume mark around 200 gallons.
tightened cap on MW-57. stopped injections, will put remaining
125 gallons into INJ-4, then come back and put aome ferrous
sulfate mox into well
8/18/2021 INJ-04 23-33 1 14:32 14:38 40 6.7 238 40 8.4% wt h2o2, ~2lbs sodium citrate, surfacing 10ft away
between monitoring wells
8/18/2021 INJ-01 23-33 1 14:59 15:06 20 3.6 238 25 8.4% wt h2o2, ~2lbs sodium citrate, surfacing at same spot as
INJ-4
8/18/2021 INJ-03 23-33 1 15:20 15:36 10 1.6 238 25 8.4% wt h2o2, ~2lbs sodium citrate, surfacing
8/18/2021 INJ-02 23-33 1 16:47 17:25 40 0.9 35 35 8.4% wt h2o2, ~2lbs sodium citrate. remaining volume of first
mix tote, inject to get rid of solution
8/18/2021 INJ-02 23-33 2 17:40 18:24 40 0.5 20 20 flush water
8/19/2021 INJ-02 23-33 2 8:35 10:43 40 0.7 90 90 4.2% H2O2 solution, ~2lbs of sodium citrate
8/19/2021 INJ-02 23-33 3 10:53 10:57 40 2.5 10 10 flush water
8/19/2021 INJ-02 23-33 3 10:57 11:16 40 6.3 119 119 1lb ferrous sulfate
8/19/2021 INJ-04 23-33 4 11:34 11:40 10 2.5 45 15 4.2% H2O2 solution, ~2lbs of sodium, citrate, surfaced around
MW-57 casing
8/19/2021 INJ-01 23-33 4 11:55 11:58 10 10.0 30 30 4.2% H2O2 solution, ~2lbs of sodium, citrate, aurfaced in
middle as before
8/19/2021 INJ-03 23-33 5 13:13 13:23 10 1.0 45 10
4.2% H2O2 solution, ~2lbs of sodium citrate, have ball valve at
injection head barely open to reduce flow rate, surfaced around
old MW
8/19/2021 INJ-01 23-33 5 13:31 13:36 10 2.0 35 10 4.2% H2O2 solution, ~2lbs of sodium citrate, surfaced in center
between all the wells
8/19/2021 INJ-02 23-33 5 13:41 13:47 10 4.2 25 25 4.2% H2O2 solution, ~2lbs of sodium citrate
8/19/2021 INJ-02 23-33 6 13:54 14:11 10 0.6 10 10 flush water
9/2/2021 INJ-01 23-33 7 9:29 9:31 2.5 5 water
9/2/2021 INJ-03 23-33 7 9:29 9:31 2.5 5 water
9/2/2021 INJ-01 23-33 7 9:36 10:31 0.5 29 0.5% H2O3 Solution, started with gravity feed
9/2/2021 INJ-03 23-33 7 9:36 10:06 1.3 37.5 0.5% H2O3 Solution, startwd with gravity, feed, surfaced
9/2/2021 INJ-01 23-33 7 10:34 10:38 10 1.1 4.5 0.5% H2O2 solution, pump on.
9/2/2021 INJ-01 23-33 8 10:59 11:03 10 2.1 8.25 0.5% H2O2 solution, pump on. surfaced in center
9/2/2021 INJ-04 23-33 8 11:09 11:44 0.8 29 0.5% H2O2 solution, gravity feed
9/2/2021 INJ-04 23-33 8 11:44 11:45 10 4.0 4 0.5% H2O2 solution, pump on. started filling up the vault
around MW-57
Redox Tech, LLC Field Injection Log Page No. 1
Zack Poole
Injection Trailer: None
2" Aro Double Diaphragm
Yadkinville, NC
8/18/2021 & 9/02/2021
Zack Poole, Geoff Ives, and Pat Anderson
MFR
8.4%, 4.2% and 0.5% wt solutions
9/2/2021 INJ-04 23-33 8 11:55 11:58 1.3 4
0.5% H2O2 solution, gravity feed, dirext from tote to well
head, raised tote up about 5 ft in air with forklift, filled and
overflowed MW-57 vault
9/2/2021 INJ-01 23-33 8 12:00 12:05 1.1 5.3
0.5% H2O2 solution, gravity feed, dirext from tote to well
head, raised tote uo about 5 ft in air with forklift, surfaced
inncenter again
9/2/2021 INJ-02 23-33 8 12:14 12:17 1.3 3.9 0.5% H2O2 solution, gravity feed
9/2/2021 INJ-02 23-33 8 12:18 12:21 20 2.4 7.1 0.5% H2O2 solution, with pump on
9/2/2021 INJ-02 23-33 9 12:34 13:34 20 2.3 140 0.5% H2O2 solution, with pump on
9/2/2021 INJ-02 23-33 9 13:44 14:46 20 2.3 140 0.5% H2O2 solution, with pump on
9/2/2021 INJ-02 23-33 9 14:54 15:14 20 3.9 77 0.5% H2O2 solution, with pump on

APPENDIX C

INJECTION PHOTOLOG

/APP C - ISCO PT PHOTO LOG.DOCX 1 22.02.24

GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
Photographic Record
Client: HGL Project Number: GR7121
Site Name: Holcomb Creosote
Company Site Site Location: Yadkinville, NC
Photograph ID: 1

Date: 8/18/2021
Direction: E
Comments: ISCO injection area
prior to pilot test implementation.
Monitoring wells have been
completed with well pads and
protective casings. Injection wells
have been left uncompleted.
Photograph ID: 2

Date: 8/18/2021
Direction: NW
Comments: ISCO injection area
during the first MFR injections.
Injection line is connected to INJ-
2.

/APP C - ISCO PT PHOTO LOG.DOCX 2 22.02.24
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
Photographic Record
Client: HGL Project Number: GR7121
Site Name: Holcomb Creosote
Company Site Site Location: Yadkinville, NC
Photograph ID: 3

Date: 8/20/2021
Direction: NE
Comments: Injection equipment
for the first MFR injections. This
includes a 250-gal tote for
hydrogen peroxide dosing,
diaphragm pump for injections,
and air compressor for the pump.
Photograph ID: 4

Date: 8/18/2021
Direction: N/A
Comments: Material information
for hydrogen peroxide used
during MFR injections.

/APP C - ISCO PT PHOTO LOG.DOCX 3 22.02.24
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
Photographic Record
Client: HGL Project Number: GR7121
Site Name: Holcomb Creosote
Company Site Site Location: Yadkinville, NC
Photograph ID: 5

Date: 8/21/2021
Direction: SE
Comments: Daylighting that
occurred during the first MFR
injections at INJ-4.
Photograph ID: 6

Date: 8/20/2021
Direction: N/A
Comments: Monitoring well
MW-3 monitored during the first
MFR injection event. Water
within the outer casing rose
during injections, which appeared
to be related to general
groundwater mounding.

/APP C - ISCO PT PHOTO LOG.DOCX 4 22.02.24
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
Photographic Record
Client: HGL Project Number: GR7121
Site Name: Holcomb Creosote
Company Site Site Location: Yadkinville, NC
Photograph ID: 7

Date: 8/20/2021
Direction: SE
Comments: Actively injecting
into INJ-2 during the first MFR
injection. Daylighting was not
observed when injecting in INJ-2.
Photograph ID: 8

Date: 8/20/2021
Direction: S
Comments: Site conditions after
breaking down and demobilizing
from first MFR injection event.

/APP C - ISCO PT PHOTO LOG.DOCX 5 22.02.24
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
Photographic Record
Client: HGL Project Number: GR7121
Site Name: Holcomb Creosote
Company Site Site Location: Yadkinville, NC
Photograph ID: 9

Date: 9/2/2021
Direction: N/A
Comments: Manifold used for
second MFR injection event.
Photograph ID: 10

Date: 9/2/2021
Direction: S
Comments: Injection area during
the second MFR injection event.
Injections occurring at INJ-1.

/APP C - ISCO PT PHOTO LOG.DOCX 6 22.02.24
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
Photographic Record
Client: HGL Project Number: GR7121
Site Name: Holcomb Creosote
Company Site Site Location: Yadkinville, NC
Photograph ID: 11

Date: 9/2/2021
Direction: N/A
Comments: Diaphragm pump
used for injections during the
second MFR injection event.
Photograph ID: 12

Date: 9/2/2021
Direction: SW
Comments: Injection area during
second MFR injection event.
Minor daylighting has occurred
within the center of the injection
area.

/APP C - ISCO PT PHOTO LOG.DOCX 7 22.02.24
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
Photographic Record
Client: HGL Project Number: GR7121
Site Name: Holcomb Creosote
Company Site Site Location: Yadkinville, NC
Photograph ID: 13

Date: 9/15/2021
Direction: SW
Comments: Injection area set up
during the sodium permanganate
injections. Injection manifold is
visible, and injection lines are
connected to INJ-1 and INJ-3.
Photograph ID: 14

Date: 9/15/2021
Direction: N/A
Comments: Material information
for sodium permanganate used
during ISCO pilot test.

/APP C - ISCO PT PHOTO LOG.DOCX 8 22.02.24
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
Photographic Record
Client: HGL Project Number: GR7121
Site Name: Holcomb Creosote
Company Site Site Location: Yadkinville, NC
Photograph ID: 15

Date: 9/15/2021
Direction: N/A
Comments: Neutralizing material
(hydrogen peroxide, vinegar) that
was used when sodium
permanganate leaked or
daylighted at the surface.
Photograph ID: 16

Date: 9/15/2021
Direction: SE
Comments: GEX applying
neutralizing solution to diluted
sodium permanganate solution
that daylighted during injections.

/APP C - ISCO PT PHOTO LOG.DOCX 9 22.02.24
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
Photographic Record
Client: HGL Project Number: GR7121
Site Name: Holcomb Creosote
Company Site Site Location: Yadkinville, NC
Photograph ID: 17

Date: 9/16/2021
Direction: E
Comments: GEX pushing DPT
injection tooling to depth at DPT-
13.
Photograph ID: 18

Date: 9/16/2021
Direction: N/A
Comments: Injection well head
attached to the DPT-13 DPT
tooling.

APPENDIX D

SOIL BORING LOGS

APPENDIX E

WELL CONSTRUCTION LOGS
WELL CAP SECURITY CASING
CASING LENGTH ABOVE GROUND SURFACE
DIMENSION OF CONCRETE PAD
GROUND SURFACE (REFERENCE POINT)
DEPTH TO TOP OF BENTONITE SEAL
DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK
DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN
END CAP
DEPTH TO BASE OF WELL
BOREHOLE DEPTH
SCREENLENGTH
SAND CELLARLENGTH
GROUT
BENTONITE SEAL
FILTER PACK
LEGEND
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
(describe and draw)
NOT TO SCALE
WELL CONSTRUCTION FORM
(STANDARD WELL)
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: ________________________ TYPE OF FILTER PACK: ____________________________
GRADIATION: ____________________________________
___________________
DRILLING TECHNIQUE: __________________________ TYPE OF BENTONITE: _____________________________
AUGER SIZE AND TYPE: __________________________ AMOUNT BENTONITE USED: ______________________
BOREHOLE IDENTIFICATION: _____________________ TYPE OF CEMENT: _________________________________
BOREHOLE DIAMETER: ___________________________ AMOUNT CEMENT USED: _________________________
WELL IDENTIFICATION: __________________________
WELL CONSTRUCTION START DATE: ______________
WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE DATE: __________ DIMENSIONS OF SECURITY CASING: _______________
SCREEN MATERIAL: ______________________________ TYPE OF WELL CAP: ______________________________
SCREEN DIAMETER: ______________________________ TYPE OF END CAP: _______________________________
STRATUM-SCREENED INTERVAL (FT): _____________
COMMENTS:
CASING MATERIAL: ______________________________
CASING DIAMETER: ______________________________
Page 1 of 6
Justin Hobart (Geosyntec Consultants)
Linda Nyland (HGL)
Geologic Exploration, Inc.
Sonic Mud Rotary
6-inch diameter hollow-stem
MW-57
6 inchesMW-57
7/26/2021
7/30/2021
Schedule 40 PVC
0.010 inches
10 feet
Schedule 40 PVC
2 inches
GP-1 sand (Southern Products & Silica Co.)
---
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: _ ____ AMOUNT OF FILTER PACK USED: __________________
3/8-inch diameter coarse-grade (Holeplug)
2-3 bags
---
GROUT MATERIAL USED: __________________________
~0.3 x 0.3 x 3 feet
Lockable j-plug
Schedule 40 PVC sump cap
Boring drilled to ~38 ft. Boring back-filled with bentonite
from 33-38 ft.
INSTALLED BY: ____________________________ INSTALLATION OBSERVED BY: ___Justin Hobart (Geosyntec Consultants)__________________________
DISCREPANCIES: _______________________________________________________________________________________
Neat cement
Neat cement
23 ft
22 ft
19 ft
10 ft
~ 0.25 ft 38 ft
33 ft
2 ft x 2 ft
~ 3 ft
Brandon Doty
~ 4 bags
WELL CAP SECURITY CASING
CASING LENGTH ABOVE GROUND SURFACE
DIMENSION OF CONCRETE PAD
GROUND SURFACE (REFERENCE POINT)
DEPTH TO TOP OF BENTONITE SEAL
DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK
DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN
END CAP
DEPTH TO BASE OF WELL
BOREHOLE DEPTH
SCREENLENGTH
SAND CELLARLENGTH
GROUT
BENTONITE SEAL
FILTER PACK
LEGEND
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
(describe and draw)
NOT TO SCALE
WELL CONSTRUCTION FORM
(STANDARD WELL)
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: ________________________ TYPE OF FILTER PACK: ____________________________
GRADIATION: ____________________________________
___________________
DRILLING TECHNIQUE: __________________________ TYPE OF BENTONITE: _____________________________
AUGER SIZE AND TYPE: __________________________
TYPE OF CEMENT: _________________________________
BOREHOLE DIAMETER: ___________________________ AMOUNT CEMENT USED: _________________________
WELL IDENTIFICATION: __________________________
WELL CONSTRUCTION START DATE: _______
WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE DATE: __________ DIMENSIONS OF SECURITY CASING: _______________
SCREEN MATERIAL: ______________________________ TYPE OF WELL CAP: ______________________________
SCREEN DIAMETER: ______________________________ TYPE OF END CAP: _______________________________
STRATUM-SCREENED INTERVAL (FT): _____________
COMMENTS:
CASING MATERIAL: ______________________________
CASING DIAMETER: ______________________________
Page 2 of 6
Justin Hobart (Geosyntec Consultants)
Linda Nyland (HGL)
Geologic Exploration, Inc.
Sonic Mud Rotary
6-inch diameter hollow-stem
BOREHOLE IDENTIFICATION:______________________
6 inchesMW-58
7_/27/2021______
7/30/2021
Schedule 40 PVC
0.010 inches
10 feet
Schedule 40 PVC
2 inches
GP-1 sand (Southern Products & Silica Co.)
---
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: _ ____ AMOUNT OF FILTER PACK USED: __________________
3/8-inch diameter coarse-grade (Holeplug)
AMOUNT BENTONITE USED: _______________________
---
GROUT MATERIAL USED: __________________________
~0.3 x 0.3 x 3 feet
Lockable j-plug
Schedule 40 PVC sump cap
INSTALLED BY: ____________________________ INSTALLATION OBSERVED BY: ___Justin Hobart (Geosyntec Consultants)__________________________
DISCREPANCIES: _______________________________________________________________________________________
Neat cement
Neat cement
23 ft
22 ft
19 ft
10 ft
~ 0.25 ft 33 ft
~ 32.75 ft
2 ft x 2 ft
~ 3 ft
Brandon Doty
MW-58
1 bag
~ 4 bags
WELL CAP SECURITY CASING
CASING LENGTH ABOVE GROUND SURFACE
DIMENSION OF CONCRETE PAD
GROUND SURFACE (REFERENCE POINT)
DEPTH TO TOP OF BENTONITE SEAL
DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK
DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN
END CAP
DEPTH TO BASE OF WELL
BOREHOLE DEPTH
SCREENLENGTH
SAND CELLARLENGTH
GROUT
BENTONITE SEAL
FILTER PACK
LEGEND
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
(describe and draw)
NOT TO SCALE
WELL CONSTRUCTION FORM
(STANDARD WELL)
GRADIATION: ____________________________________
___________________
DRILLING TECHNIQUE: __________________________ TYPE OF BENTONITE: _____________________________
______
WELL IDENTIFICATION: __________________________
WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE DATE: __________ DIMENSIONS OF SECURITY CASING: _______________
SCREEN MATERIAL: ______________________________ TYPE OF WELL CAP: ______________________________
SCREEN DIAMETER: ______________________________ TYPE OF END CAP: _______________________________
STRATUM-SCREENED INTERVAL (FT): _____________
COMMENTS:
CASING MATERIAL: ______________________________
CASING DIAMETER: ______________________________
Page 3 of 6
Justin Hobart (Geosyntec Consultants)
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: ________________________ Linda Nyland (HGL) TYPE OF FILTER PACK: _
Geologic Exploration, Inc.
Sonic Mud Rotary
AUGER SIZE AND TYPE: __________________________6-inch diameter hollow-stem
BOREHOLE IDENTIFICATION:__________________
6 inchesINJ-1
WELL CONSTRUCTION START DATE: ____________________________
Schedule 40 PVC
0.010 inches
10 feet
Schedule 40 PVC
2 inches
___________________________GP-1 sand (Southern Products & Silica Co.)
---
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: _ ____ AMOUNT OF FILTER PACK USED: __________________
3/8-inch diameter coarse-grade (Holeplug)
BOREHOLE DIAMETER: ___ __________________ AMOUNT CEMENT USED: ---_________________________
~0.3 x 0.3 x 3 feet
Lockable j-plug
Schedule 40 PVC sump cap
INSTALLED BY: ____________________________ INSTALLATION OBSERVED BY: ___Justin Hobart (Geosyntec Consultants)__________________________
DISCREPANCIES: _______________________________________________________________________________________
TYPE OF CEMENT: ___________Neat cement_____________________
GROUT MATERIAL USED: Neat cement__________________________
23 ft
22ft
19 ft
10 ft
~ 0.25 ft 33 ft
~ 32.75 ft
2 ft x 2 ft
~ 3 ft
Brandon Doty
INJ-____1
AMOUNT BENTONITE USED: ______________________
~ 4 bags
____7/28/2021___
---
Riser pipe and casing materials installed 7/28/2021
through 7/30/21. Security casing and well pad
installed within the following weeks.
1 bag
WELL CAP SECURITY CASING
CASING LENGTH ABOVE GROUND SURFACE
DIMENSION OF CONCRETE PAD
GROUND SURFACE (REFERENCE POINT)
DEPTH TO TOP OF BENTONITE SEAL
DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK
DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN
END CAP
DEPTH TO BASE OF WELL
BOREHOLE DEPTH
SCREENLENGTH
SAND CELLARLENGTH
GROUT
BENTONITE SEAL
FILTER PACK
LEGEND
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
(describe and draw)
NOT TO SCALE
WELL CONSTRUCTION FORM
(STANDARD WELL)
GRADIATION: ____________________________________
___________________
DRILLING TECHNIQUE: __________________________ TYPE OF BENTONITE: _____________________________
______
WELL IDENTIFICATION: __________________________
SCREEN DIAMETER: ______________________________ TYPE OF END CAP: _______________________________
STRATUM-SCREENED INTERVAL (FT): _____________
COMMENTS:
CASING MATERIAL: ______________________________
CASING DIAMETER: ______________________________
Page 4 of 6
Justin Hobart (Geosyntec Consultants)
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: ________________________ Linda Nyland (HGL) TYPE OF FILTER PACK: _
Geologic Exploration, Inc.
Sonic Mud Rotary
AUGER SIZE AND TYPE: __________________________6-inch diameter hollow-stem
6 inchesINJ-2
0.010 inches
10 feet
Schedule 40 PVC
2 inches
___________________________GP-1 sand (Southern Products & Silica Co.)
---
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: _ ____ AMOUNT OF FILTER PACK USED: __________________
3/8-inch diameter coarse-grade (Holeplug)
BOREHOLE DIAMETER: ___ __________________ AMOUNT CEMENT USED: ---_________________________
Schedule 40 PVC sump cap
INSTALLED BY: ____________________________ INSTALLATION OBSERVED BY: ___Justin Hobart (Geosyntec Consultants)__________________________
DISCREPANCIES: _______________________________________________________________________________________
TYPE OF CEMENT: ___________Neat cement_____________________
GROUT MATERIAL USED: Neat cement__________________________
23 ft
22 ft
19 ft
10 ft
~ 0.25 ft 33 ft
~ 32.75 ft
2 ft x 2 ft
~ 3 ft
Brandon Doty
BOREHOLE IDENTIFICATION:_______________________________________INJ-2
AMOUNT BENTONITE USED: ______________________
~ 4 bags
WELL CONSTRUCTION START DATE: ____________________________
WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE DATE: _ ---_________ DIMENSIONS OF SECURITY CASING: _______________~0.3 x 0.3 x 3 feet
Schedule 40 PVC____________SCREEN MATERIAL: ___ _______________ TYPE OF WELL CAP: Lockable j-plug______________________________
Riser pipe and casing materials installed 7/27/2021
through 7/30/21. Security casing and well pad
installed within the following weeks.
1 bag
7/27/2021
WELL CAP SECURITY CASING
CASING LENGTH ABOVE GROUND SURFACE
DIMENSION OF CONCRETE PAD
GROUND SURFACE (REFERENCE POINT)
DEPTH TO TOP OF BENTONITE SEAL
DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK
DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN
END CAP
DEPTH TO BASE OF WELL
BOREHOLE DEPTH
SCREENLENGTH
SAND CELLARLENGTH
GROUT
BENTONITE SEAL
FILTER PACK
LEGEND
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
(describe and draw)
NOT TO SCALE
WELL CONSTRUCTION FORM
(STANDARD WELL)
GRADIATION: ____________________________________
___________________
DRILLING TECHNIQUE: __________________________ TYPE OF BENTONITE: _____________________________
______
WELL IDENTIFICATION: __________________________
SCREEN DIAMETER: ______________________________ TYPE OF END CAP: _______________________________
STRATUM-SCREENED INTERVAL (FT): _____________
COMMENTS:
CASING MATERIAL: ______________________________
CASING DIAMETER: ______________________________
Page 5 of 6
Justin Hobart (Geosyntec Consultants)
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: ________________________ Linda Nyland (HGL) TYPE OF FILTER PACK: _
Geologic Exploration, Inc.
Sonic Mud Rotary
AUGER SIZE AND TYPE: __________________________6-inch diameter hollow-stem
6 inchesINJ-3
0.010 inches
10 feet
Schedule 40 PVC
2 inches
___________________________GP-1 sand (Southern Products & Silica Co.)
---
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: _ ____ AMOUNT OF FILTER PACK USED: __________________
3/8-inch diameter coarse-grade (Holeplug)
BOREHOLE DIAMETER: ___ __________________ AMOUNT CEMENT USED: ---_________________________
Schedule 40 PVC sump cap
INSTALLED BY: ____________________________ INSTALLATION OBSERVED BY: ___Justin Hobart (Geosyntec Consultants)__________________________
DISCREPANCIES: _______________________________________________________________________________________
TYPE OF CEMENT: ___________Neat cement_____________________
GROUT MATERIAL USED: Neat cement__________________________
23 ft
22 ft
16 ft
10 ft
~ 0.25 ft 33 ft
~ 32.75 ft
2 ft x 2 ft
~ 3 ft
Brandon Doty
BOREHOLE IDENTIFICATION:_______________________________________

~ 4 bags
WELL CONSTRUCTION START DATE: _____________
WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE DATE: _ ---_________ DIMENSIONS OF SECURITY CASING: _______________~0.3 x 0.3 x 3 feet
Schedule 40 PVC____________SCREEN MATERIAL: ___ _______________ TYPE OF WELL CAP: Lockable j-plug______________________________
Riser pipe and casing materials installed 7/27/2021 through 7/30/21.
Security casing and well pad installed within the following weeks.
Potential filter pack blow-out sand observed at ~19-20 ft from boring
soil. Bentonite installed from 16-22 ft.
AMOUNT BENTONITE USED: _______________________
7_____/29/2021__________
INJ-3
2 bags
WELL CAP SECURITY CASING
CASING LENGTH ABOVE GROUND SURFACE
DIMENSION OF CONCRETE PAD
GROUND SURFACE (REFERENCE POINT)
DEPTH TO TOP OF BENTONITE SEAL
DEPTH TO TOP OF FILTER PACK
DEPTH TO TOP OF SCREEN
END CAP
DEPTH TO BASE OF WELL
BOREHOLE DEPTH
SCREENLENGTH
SAND CELLARLENGTH
GROUT
BENTONITE SEAL
FILTER PACK
LEGEND
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
(describe and draw)
NOT TO SCALE
WELL CONSTRUCTION FORM
(STANDARD WELL)
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: ________________________ TYPE OF FILTER PACK: ____________________________
GRADIATION: ____________________________________
___________________
DRILLING TECHNIQUE: __________________________ TYPE OF BENTONITE: _____________________________
TYPE OF CEMENT: _________________________________
BOREHOLE DIAMETER: ___________________________ AMOUNT CEMENT USED: _________________________
WELL IDENTIFICATION: __________________________
WELL CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE DATE: __________ DIMENSIONS OF SECURITY CASING: _______________
SCREEN MATERIAL: ______________________________ TYPE OF WELL CAP: ______________________________
SCREEN DIAMETER: ______________________________ TYPE OF END CAP: _______________________________
STRATUM-SCREENED INTERVAL (FT): _____________
COMMENTS:
CASING MATERIAL: ______________________________
CASING DIAMETER: ______________________________
Page 6 of 6
Justin Hobart (Geosyntec Consultants)
Linda Nyland (HGL)
Geologic Exploration, Inc.
Sonic Mud Rotary
AUGER SIZE AND TYPE: __________________________6-inch diameter hollow-stem
BOREHOLE IDENTIFICATION:______________________
6 inchesINJ-4
WELL CONSTRUCTION START DATE: ______ _______
Schedule 40 PVC
0.010 inches
10 feet
Schedule 40 PVC
2 inches
GP-1 sand (Southern Products & Silica Co.)
---
DRILLING CONTRACTOR: _ ____ AMOUNT OF FILTER PACK USED: __________________
3/8-inch diameter coarse-grade (Holeplug)
---
GROUT MATERIAL USED: __________________________
~0.3 x 0.3 x 3 feet
Lockable j-plug
Schedule 40 PVC sump cap
INSTALLED BY: ____________________________ INSTALLATION OBSERVED BY: ___Justin Hobart (Geosyntec Consultants)__________________________
DISCREPANCIES: _______________________________________________________________________________________
Neat cement
Neat cement
23 ft
23ft
16 ft
10 ft
~ 0.25 ft 33 ft
~ 32.75 ft
2 ft x 2 ft
~ 3 ft
Brandon Doty
INJ-4
AMOUNT BENTONITE USED: 2 bag__________s_____________
~ 4 bags
7/____28_______________/2021___
---
Riser pipe and casing materials installed 7/28/2021 through 7/30/21.
Security casing and well pad installed within the following weeks.
Potential blow-out filter pack sand observed in boring soils from ~19-20 ft
and PWR interpreted at 22 ft; therefore bentonite was placed from 17-23 ft.

APPENDIX F

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Laura Ackerman
August 24, 2021
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
FROM:
FINAL Analytical Report
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Laura Ackerman
LSB Inorganic Chemistry Section Chief
Laboratory Services Branch
John Deatrick, ChiefTHRU:
TO:Joydeb Majumder
Attached are the final results for the analytical groups listed below. This report shall not be reproduced except in
full without approval of the Region 4 laboratory. These analyses were performed in accordance with the
Laboratory Services Branch's Laboratory Operations and Quality Assurance Manual (LSB LOQAM) found at
www.epa.gov/region4/sesd/asbsop. Any unique project data quality objectives specified in writing by the data
requestor have also been incorporated into the data unless otherwise noted in the Report Narrative. Chemistry
data have been verified based on the LSB LOQAM specifications and have been qualified by this laboratory if
the applicable quality control criteria were not met. Verification is defined in Chapter 5 of the LSB LOQAM. For
a listing of specific data qualifiers and explanations, please refer to the Data Qualifier Definitions included in
this report. The reported results are accurate within the limits of the method(s) and are representative only of the
samples as received by the laboratory.
Analyses Included in this report:Method Used:Accreditations:
Dissolved Metals (DMTL)
Dissolved Metals ISOEPA 6010 (Water)
Total Metals (TMTL)
Total Metals ISOEPA 6010 (Water)
8/24/21 10:13E213107 DMTL TMTL FINAL 08 24 21 1013Page 1 of 15
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Laura Ackerman
Sample Disposal Policy
Due to limited space for long term sample storage, LSB’s policy is to dispose of samples on a periodic schedule.
Air samples collected in summa canisters will be disposed of 30 days following the issuance of this report. All
other sample media including original samples, sample extracts and or digestates will be disposed of, in
accordance with applicable regulations, 60 days from the date of this report.
This sample disposal policy does not apply to criminal samples which are held until the laboratory is notified by
the criminal investigators that case development and litigation are complete.
These samples may be held in the laboratory's custody for a longer period of time. If samples require storage
beyond the 60-day period, please contact the Sample Control Coordinator by e-mail at
[e-mail].
cc: Nardina Turner
8/24/21 10:13E213107 DMTL TMTL FINAL 08 24 21 1013Page 2 of 15
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Laura Ackerman
Date ReceivedDate CollectedMatrixLaboratory IDSample ID
SAMPLES INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
MW-2 E213107-01 Groundwater 7/28/21 18:30 7/30/21 10:15
MW-57 E213107-02 Groundwater 7/29/21 14:05 7/30/21 10:15
MW-58 E213107-03 Groundwater 7/29/21 16:35 7/30/21 10:15
MW-6 E213107-04 Groundwater 7/28/21 12:40 7/30/21 10:15
8/24/21 10:13E213107 DMTL TMTL FINAL 08 24 21 1013Page 3 of 15
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Laura Ackerman
DATA QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS
CR Dissolved>total. RPD is within method allowed precision.
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
CAS Chemical Abstracts Service
Note: Analytes with no known CAS identifiers have been assigned codes beginning with "E", the EPA ID as assigned by
the EPA Substance Registry System (www.epa.gov/srs), or beginning with "R4-", a unique identifier assigned by the EPA
Region 4 laboratory.
MDL Method Detection Limit - The minimum concentration of a substance (an analyte) that can be measured and
reported with a 99% confidence that the analyte concentration is greater than zero.
MRL Minimum Reporting Limit - Analyte concentration that corresponds to the lowest demonstrated level of acceptable
quantitation. The MRL is sample-specific and accounts for preparation weights and volumes, dilutions, and
moisture content of soil/sediments.
TIC Tentatively Identified Compound - An analyte identified based on a match with the instrument software's mass
spectral library. A calibration standard has not been analyzed to confirm the compound's identification or the
estimated concentration reported.
ACCREDITATIONS:
ISO Accredited to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and accreditation requirements for Forensic Science Testing Laboratories.
Refer to the certificate and scope of accreditation FT-0330 at:
http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-region-4s-science-and-ecosystem-support-division-sesd
NR Not accredited for this test.
DW Accredited for conformance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and testing elements in the Fifth Edition of the Manual for
the Certification of Laboratories Analyzing Drinking Water, EPA 815-R-05-004, 2005.
Refer to the certificate and scope of accreditation AT-2628 at:
http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-region-4s-science-and-ecosystem-support-division-sesd
ISO/DW Accredited to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and accreditation requirements for Forensic Science Testing Labs, and
conformance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and testing elements in the Manual for the Certification of Laboratories
Analyzing Drinking Water.
8/24/21 10:13E213107 DMTL TMTL FINAL 08 24 21 1013Page 4 of 15
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Laura Ackerman
Total Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2 E213107-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/28/21 18:30
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
100Ironug/L EPA 6010160007439-89-6 8/12/2112:548/03/2110:55
5.0Manganeseug/L EPA 601029007439-96-5 8/12/2112:548/03/2110:55
8/24/21 10:13E213107 DMTL TMTL FINAL 08 24 21 1013Page 5 of 15
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Laura Ackerman
Dissolved Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2 E213107-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/28/21 18:30
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
100Ironug/L EPA 6010150007439-89-6 8/12/2112:238/03/2111:19
5.0Manganeseug/L EPA 601029007439-96-5 8/12/2112:238/03/2111:19
8/24/21 10:13E213107 DMTL TMTL FINAL 08 24 21 1013Page 6 of 15
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Laura Ackerman
Total Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57 E213107-02
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/29/21 14:05
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
100Ironug/L EPA 601016007439-89-6 8/12/2112:578/03/2110:55
5.0Manganeseug/L EPA 601011007439-96-5 8/12/2112:578/03/2110:55
8/24/21 10:13E213107 DMTL TMTL FINAL 08 24 21 1013Page 7 of 15
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Laura Ackerman
Dissolved Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57 E213107-02
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/29/21 14:05
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
100Ironug/L EPA 601012007439-89-6 8/12/2112:268/03/2111:19
5.0Manganeseug/L EPA 601011007439-96-5 8/12/2112:268/03/2111:19
8/24/21 10:13E213107 DMTL TMTL FINAL 08 24 21 1013Page 8 of 15
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Laura Ackerman
Total Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58 E213107-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/29/21 16:35
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
100Ironug/L EPA 6010150007439-89-6 8/12/2113:008/03/2110:55
5.0Manganeseug/L EPA 601017007439-96-5 8/12/2113:008/03/2110:55
8/24/21 10:13E213107 DMTL TMTL FINAL 08 24 21 1013Page 9 of 15
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Laura Ackerman
Dissolved Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58 E213107-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/29/21 16:35
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
100Ironug/L EPA 6010140007439-89-6 8/12/2112:348/03/2111:19
5.0Manganeseug/L EPA 601017007439-96-5 8/12/2112:348/03/2111:19
8/24/21 10:13E213107 DMTL TMTL FINAL 08 24 21 1013Page 10 of 15
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Laura Ackerman
Total Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6 E213107-04
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/28/21 12:40
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
100Ironug/L EPA 6010110007439-89-6 8/12/2113:088/03/2110:55
5.0Manganeseug/L EPA 601030007439-96-5 8/12/2113:088/03/2110:55
8/24/21 10:13E213107 DMTL TMTL FINAL 08 24 21 1013Page 11 of 15
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Laura Ackerman
Dissolved Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6 E213107-04
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/28/21 12:40
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
100Ironug/L EPA 601012000CR7439-89-6 8/12/2112:378/03/2111:19
5.0Manganeseug/L EPA 60103100CR7439-96-5 8/12/2112:378/03/2111:19
8/24/21 10:13E213107 DMTL TMTL FINAL 08 24 21 1013Page 12 of 15
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Laura Ackerman
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Total Metals (TMTL) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2108006 - M 200.2 Metals Water
Blank (2108006-BLK1)Prepared: 08/03/21 Analyzed: 08/12/21
EPA 6010
Iron ug/LU100 U
Manganese "U 5.0 U
LCS (2108006-BS1)Prepared: 08/03/21 Analyzed: 08/12/21
EPA 6010
Iron ug/L5183.0 100 5000.0 85-115104
Manganese "513.76 5.0 500.00 85-115103
Matrix Spike (2108006-MS1)Prepared: 08/03/21 Analyzed: 08/12/21 Source: E213107-03
EPA 6010
Iron ug/L19452100 5000.0 14837 75-12592.3
Manganese "2140.2 5.0 500.00 1668.5 75-12594.3
Matrix Spike Dup (2108006-MSD1)Prepared: 08/03/21 Analyzed: 08/12/21 Source: E213107-03
EPA 6010
Iron ug/L19707100 5000.0 14837 2075-12597.4 1.30
Manganese "2180.5 5.0 500.00 1668.5 2075-125102 1.87
MRL Verification (2108006-PS1)Prepared: 08/03/21 Analyzed: 08/12/21
EPA 6010
Iron ug/L101.99 100 100.00 MRL-270-130102
Manganese "6.1776 5.0 5.0000 MRL-270-130124
8/24/21 10:13E213107 DMTL TMTL FINAL 08 24 21 1013Page 13 of 15
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Laura Ackerman
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Dissolved Metals (DMTL) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2108008 - M 200.2 Metals Water
Blank (2108008-BLK1)Prepared: 08/03/21 Analyzed: 08/12/21
EPA 6010
Iron ug/LU100 U
Manganese "U 5.0 U
LCS (2108008-BS1)Prepared: 08/03/21 Analyzed: 08/12/21
EPA 6010
Iron ug/L5184.4 100 5000.0 85-115104
Manganese "513.92 5.0 500.00 85-115103
Matrix Spike (2108008-MS1)Prepared: 08/03/21 Analyzed: 08/12/21 Source: E213107-02
EPA 6010
Iron ug/L6374.2 100 5000.0 1163.1 75-125104
Manganese "1581.0 5.0 500.00 1097.4 75-12596.7
Matrix Spike Dup (2108008-MSD1)Prepared: 08/03/21 Analyzed: 08/12/21 Source: E213107-02
EPA 6010
Iron ug/L6329.8 100 5000.0 1163.1 2075-125103 0.700
Manganese "1584.7 5.0 500.00 1097.4 2075-12597.5 0.230
MRL Verification (2108008-PS1)Prepared: 08/03/21 Analyzed: 08/12/21
EPA 6010
Iron ug/L111.75 100 100.00 MRL-270-130112
Manganese "7.3099 5.0 5.0000 MRL-2,
QR-2
70-130146
8/24/21 10:13E213107 DMTL TMTL FINAL 08 24 21 1013Page 14 of 15
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Laura Ackerman
Notes and Definitions for QC Samples
U The analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit.
MRL-2 MRL verification for Non-Potable Water matrix
QR-2 MRL verification recovery greater than upper control limits.
8/24/21 10:13E213107 DMTL TMTL FINAL 08 24 21 1013Page 15 of 15
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
August 12, 2021
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
FROM:
FINAL Analytical Report
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Stacie Masters
LSB Organic Chemistry Section Chief
Laboratory Services Branch
John Deatrick, ChiefTHRU:
TO:Joydeb Majumder
Attached are the final results for the analytical groups listed below. This report shall not be reproduced except in
full without approval of the Region 4 laboratory. These analyses were performed in accordance with the
Laboratory Services Branch's Laboratory Operations and Quality Assurance Manual (LSB LOQAM) found at
www.epa.gov/region4/sesd/asbsop. Any unique project data quality objectives specified in writing by the data
requestor have also been incorporated into the data unless otherwise noted in the Report Narrative. Chemistry
data have been verified based on the LSB LOQAM specifications and have been qualified by this laboratory if
the applicable quality control criteria were not met. Verification is defined in Chapter 5 of the LSB LOQAM. For
a listing of specific data qualifiers and explanations, please refer to the Data Qualifier Definitions included in
this report. The reported results are accurate within the limits of the method(s) and are representative only of the
samples as received by the laboratory.
Analyses Included in this report:Method Used:Accreditations:
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA)
Semivolatile organic compounds ISOEPA 8270D (Water)
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 1 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Sample Disposal Policy
Due to limited space for long term sample storage, LSB’s policy is to dispose of samples on a periodic schedule.
Air samples collected in summa canisters will be disposed of 30 days following the issuance of this report. All
other sample media including original samples, sample extracts and or digestates will be disposed of, in
accordance with applicable regulations, 60 days from the date of this report.
This sample disposal policy does not apply to criminal samples which are held until the laboratory is notified by
the criminal investigators that case development and litigation are complete.
These samples may be held in the laboratory's custody for a longer period of time. If samples require storage
beyond the 60-day period, please contact the Sample Control Coordinator by e-mail at
[e-mail].
cc: Nardina Turner
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 2 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Date ReceivedDate CollectedMatrixLaboratory IDSample ID
SAMPLES INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
MW-2 E213107-01 Groundwater 7/28/21 18:30 7/30/21 10:15
MW-57 E213107-02 Groundwater 7/29/21 14:05 7/30/21 10:15
MW-58 E213107-03 Groundwater 7/29/21 16:35 7/30/21 10:15
MW-6 E213107-04 Groundwater 7/28/21 12:40 7/30/21 10:15
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 3 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
DATA QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS
U The analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit.
J The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
NJ Presumptive evidence that analyte is present; reported as a tentative identification with an estimated value.
Q-2 Result greater than MDL but less than MRL.
QL-3 Laboratory Control Spike Precision outside method control limits
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
CAS Chemical Abstracts Service
Note: Analytes with no known CAS identifiers have been assigned codes beginning with "E", the EPA ID as assigned by
the EPA Substance Registry System (www.epa.gov/srs), or beginning with "R4-", a unique identifier assigned by the EPA
Region 4 laboratory.
MDL Method Detection Limit - The minimum concentration of a substance (an analyte) that can be measured and
reported with a 99% confidence that the analyte concentration is greater than zero.
MRL Minimum Reporting Limit - Analyte concentration that corresponds to the lowest demonstrated level of acceptable
quantitation. The MRL is sample-specific and accounts for preparation weights and volumes, dilutions, and
moisture content of soil/sediments.
TIC Tentatively Identified Compound - An analyte identified based on a match with the instrument software's mass
spectral library. A calibration standard has not been analyzed to confirm the compound's identification or the
estimated concentration reported.
ACCREDITATIONS:
ISO Accredited to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and accreditation requirements for Forensic Science Testing Laboratories.
Refer to the certificate and scope of accreditation FT-0330 at:
http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-region-4s-science-and-ecosystem-support-division-sesd
NR Not accredited for this test.
DW Accredited for conformance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and testing elements in the Fifth Edition of the Manual for
the Certification of Laboratories Analyzing Drinking Water, EPA 815-R-05-004, 2005.
Refer to the certificate and scope of accreditation AT-2628 at:
http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-region-4s-science-and-ecosystem-support-division-sesd
ISO/DW Accredited to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and accreditation requirements for Forensic Science Testing Labs, and
conformance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and testing elements in the Manual for the Certification of Laboratories
Analyzing Drinking Water.
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 4 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2 E213107-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/28/21 18:30
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
11(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D11U1319-77-3 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
2.11,1-Biphenyl ug/L EPA 8270D11092-52-4 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
2.11,4-Dioxane ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U123-91-1 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
421-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D42090-12-0 8/03/2120:058/02/21 7:56
112,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D11U58-90-2 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
112,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D11U95-95-4 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
112,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D11U88-06-2 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
112,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D11U120-83-2 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
112,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D11U105-67-9 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
212,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D21U51-28-5 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
112,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D11U121-14-2 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
112,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D11U606-20-2 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
112-Chloronaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D11U91-58-7 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
112-Chlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D11U95-57-8 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
112-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D11U534-52-1 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
422-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D81091-57-6 8/03/2120:058/02/21 7:56
112-Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D11U95-48-7 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
112-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D11U88-74-4 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
112-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D11U88-75-5 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
113,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L EPA 8270D11U91-94-1 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
113-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D11U99-09-2 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
114-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D11U101-55-3 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
114-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D11U59-50-7 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
114-Chloroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D11U106-47-8 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
114-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D11U7005-72-3 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
114-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D11U100-01-6 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
114-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D11U100-02-7 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
42Acenaphtheneug/L EPA 8270D47083-32-9 8/03/2120:058/02/21 7:56
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 5 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2 E213107-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/28/21 18:30
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
2.1Acenaphthyleneug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U208-96-8 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11Acetophenoneug/L EPA 8270D11U98-86-2 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
2.1Anthraceneug/L EPA 8270D3.7120-12-7 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11Atrazineug/L EPA 8270D11U1912-24-9 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11Benzaldehydeug/L EPA 8270D11U100-52-7 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
2.1Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U56-55-3 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
2.1Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U50-32-8 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
2.1Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U205-99-2 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
2.1Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U191-24-2 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
2.1Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U207-08-9 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11Benzyl alcohol ug/L EPA 8270D11U100-51-6 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D11U, J, QL-385-68-7 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether ug/L EPA 8270D11U108-60-1 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L EPA 8270D11U111-91-1 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether ug/L EPA 8270D11U111-44-4 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D11U117-81-7 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11Caprolactamug/L EPA 8270D11U105-60-2 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
42Carbazoleug/L EPA 8270D14086-74-8 8/03/2120:058/02/21 7:56
2.1Chryseneug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U218-01-9 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
2.1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U53-70-3 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
42Dibenzofuranug/L EPA 8270D260132-64-9 8/03/2120:058/02/21 7:56
11Diethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D11U84-66-2 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11Dimethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D11U131-11-3 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D11U84-74-2 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D11U117-84-0 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
2.1Fluorantheneug/L EPA 8270D10206-44-0 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
42Fluoreneug/L EPA 8270D19086-73-7 8/03/2120:058/02/21 7:56
11Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)ug/L EPA 8270D11U, J, QL-3118-74-1 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)ug/L EPA 8270D11U77-47-4 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 6 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2 E213107-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/28/21 18:30
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
11Hexachloroethaneug/L EPA 8270D11U67-72-1 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
2.1Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U193-39-5 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11Isophoroneug/L EPA 8270D11U78-59-1 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
210Naphthaleneug/L EPA 8270D510091-20-3 8/05/2116:238/02/21 7:56
11Nitrobenzeneug/L EPA 8270D11U98-95-3 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine ug/L EPA 8270D11U621-64-7 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L EPA 8270D11U122-39-4 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
11Pentachlorophenolug/L EPA 8270D11U87-86-5 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
42Phenanthreneug/L EPA 8270D21085-01-8 8/03/2120:058/02/21 7:56
11Phenolug/L EPA 8270D11U108-95-2 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
2.1Pyreneug/L EPA 8270D5.6129-00-0 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
EPA 8270Dug/L10Biphenylcarboxaldehyde (TIC)NJR4-8001490 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
EPA 8270Dug/L70Dimethylnaphthalene (TIC)NJR4-6507 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
EPA 8270Dug/L10Phenanthridinone (TIC)NJR4-8000020 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
EPA 8270Dug/L20Unidentified Compound(s)JR4-6501 8/03/2117:248/02/21 7:56
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 7 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57 E213107-02
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/29/21 14:05
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U1319-77-3 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
411,1-Biphenyl ug/L EPA 8270D14092-52-4 8/03/2120:378/02/21 7:56
2.01,4-Dioxane ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U123-91-1 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
411-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D43090-12-0 8/03/2120:378/02/21 7:56
102,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U58-90-2 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
102,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-95-4 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
102,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-06-2 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
102,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U120-83-2 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
102,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U105-67-9 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
202,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D20U51-28-5 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
102,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U121-14-2 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
102,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U606-20-2 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
102-Chloronaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-58-7 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
102-Chlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-57-8 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
102-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U534-52-1 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
412-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D98091-57-6 8/03/2120:378/02/21 7:56
102-Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-48-7 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
102-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-74-4 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
102-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-75-5 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
103,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-94-1 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
103-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U99-09-2 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
104-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U101-55-3 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
104-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U59-50-7 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
104-Chloroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U106-47-8 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
104-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U7005-72-3 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
104-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-01-6 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
104-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-02-7 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
41Acenaphtheneug/L EPA 8270D69083-32-9 8/03/2120:378/02/21 7:56
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 8 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57 E213107-02
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/29/21 14:05
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
2.0Acenaphthyleneug/L EPA 8270D4.2208-96-8 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10Acetophenoneug/L EPA 8270D10U98-86-2 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
2.0Anthraceneug/L EPA 8270D1.0 J, Q-2120-12-7 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10Atrazineug/L EPA 8270D10U1912-24-9 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10Benzaldehydeug/L EPA 8270D10U100-52-7 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
2.0Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U56-55-3 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
2.0Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U50-32-8 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
2.0Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U205-99-2 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
2.0Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U191-24-2 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
2.0Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U207-08-9 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10Benzyl alcohol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-51-6 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U, J, QL-385-68-7 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U108-60-1 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-91-1 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-44-4 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-81-7 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10Caprolactamug/L EPA 8270D10U105-60-2 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
41Carbazoleug/L EPA 8270D22086-74-8 8/03/2120:378/02/21 7:56
2.0Chryseneug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U218-01-9 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
2.0Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U53-70-3 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
41Dibenzofuranug/L EPA 8270D360132-64-9 8/03/2120:378/02/21 7:56
10Diethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-66-2 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10Dimethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U131-11-3 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-74-2 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-84-0 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
2.0Fluorantheneug/L EPA 8270D2.7206-44-0 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
41Fluoreneug/L EPA 8270D15086-73-7 8/03/2120:378/02/21 7:56
10Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)ug/L EPA 8270D10U, J, QL-3118-74-1 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)ug/L EPA 8270D10U77-47-4 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 9 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57 E213107-02
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/29/21 14:05
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10Hexachloroethaneug/L EPA 8270D10U67-72-1 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
2.0Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U193-39-5 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10Isophoroneug/L EPA 8270D10U78-59-1 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
200Naphthaleneug/L EPA 8270D1100091-20-3 8/05/2116:558/02/21 7:56
10Nitrobenzeneug/L EPA 8270D10U98-95-3 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U621-64-7 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U122-39-4 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
10Pentachlorophenolug/L EPA 8270D10U87-86-5 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
41Phenanthreneug/L EPA 8270D12085-01-8 8/03/2120:378/02/21 7:56
10Phenolug/L EPA 8270D10U108-95-2 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
2.0Pyreneug/L EPA 8270D1.2 J, Q-2129-00-0 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
EPA 8270Dug/L80Dimethylnaphthalene (TIC)NJR4-6507 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
EPA 8270Dug/L20Thebenidinone (TIC)NJR4-8001489 8/03/2117:568/02/21 7:56
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 10 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58 E213107-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/29/21 16:35
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U1319-77-3 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
401,1-Biphenyl ug/L EPA 8270D10092-52-4 8/03/2121:098/02/21 7:56
2.01,4-Dioxane ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U123-91-1 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
401-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D31090-12-0 8/03/2121:098/02/21 7:56
102,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U58-90-2 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
102,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-95-4 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
102,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-06-2 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
102,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U120-83-2 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
102,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U105-67-9 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
202,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D20U51-28-5 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
102,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U121-14-2 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
102,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U606-20-2 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
102-Chloronaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-58-7 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
102-Chlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-57-8 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
102-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U534-52-1 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
402-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D73091-57-6 8/03/2121:098/02/21 7:56
102-Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-48-7 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
102-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-74-4 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
102-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-75-5 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
103,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-94-1 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
103-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U99-09-2 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
104-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U101-55-3 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
104-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U59-50-7 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
104-Chloroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U106-47-8 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
104-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U7005-72-3 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
104-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-01-6 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
104-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-02-7 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
40Acenaphtheneug/L EPA 8270D45083-32-9 8/03/2121:098/02/21 7:56
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 11 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58 E213107-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/29/21 16:35
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
2.0Acenaphthyleneug/L EPA 8270D5.9208-96-8 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10Acetophenoneug/L EPA 8270D10U98-86-2 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
2.0Anthraceneug/L EPA 8270D5.3120-12-7 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10Atrazineug/L EPA 8270D10U1912-24-9 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10Benzaldehydeug/L EPA 8270D10U100-52-7 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
2.0Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U56-55-3 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
2.0Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U50-32-8 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
2.0Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U205-99-2 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
2.0Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U191-24-2 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
2.0Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U207-08-9 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10Benzyl alcohol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-51-6 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U, J, QL-385-68-7 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U108-60-1 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-91-1 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-44-4 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-81-7 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10Caprolactamug/L EPA 8270D10U105-60-2 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
40Carbazoleug/L EPA 8270D13086-74-8 8/03/2121:098/02/21 7:56
2.0Chryseneug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U218-01-9 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
2.0Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U53-70-3 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
40Dibenzofuranug/L EPA 8270D250132-64-9 8/03/2121:098/02/21 7:56
10Diethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-66-2 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10Dimethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U131-11-3 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-74-2 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-84-0 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
2.0Fluorantheneug/L EPA 8270D7.6206-44-0 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
40Fluoreneug/L EPA 8270D13086-73-7 8/03/2121:098/02/21 7:56
10Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)ug/L EPA 8270D10U, J, QL-3118-74-1 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)ug/L EPA 8270D10U77-47-4 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 12 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58 E213107-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/29/21 16:35
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10Hexachloroethaneug/L EPA 8270D10U67-72-1 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
2.0Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U193-39-5 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10Isophoroneug/L EPA 8270D10U78-59-1 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
200Naphthaleneug/L EPA 8270D660091-20-3 8/05/2117:278/02/21 7:56
10Nitrobenzeneug/L EPA 8270D10U98-95-3 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U621-64-7 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U122-39-4 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
10Pentachlorophenolug/L EPA 8270D10U87-86-5 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
40Phenanthreneug/L EPA 8270D11085-01-8 8/03/2121:098/02/21 7:56
10Phenolug/L EPA 8270D10U108-95-2 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
2.0Pyreneug/L EPA 8270D4.2129-00-0 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
EPA 8270Dug/L70Dimethylnaphthalene (TIC)NJR4-6507 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
EPA 8270Dug/L20Unidentified Compound(s)JR4-6501 8/03/2118:288/02/21 7:56
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 13 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6 E213107-04
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/28/21 12:40
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
9.9(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U1319-77-3 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
401,1-Biphenyl ug/L EPA 8270D14092-52-4 8/03/2121:418/02/21 7:56
2.01,4-Dioxane ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U123-91-1 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
401-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D45090-12-0 8/03/2121:418/02/21 7:56
9.92,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U58-90-2 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.92,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U95-95-4 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.92,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U88-06-2 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.92,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U120-83-2 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.92,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U105-67-9 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
202,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D20U51-28-5 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.92,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U121-14-2 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.92,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U606-20-2 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.92-Chloronaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U91-58-7 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.92-Chlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U95-57-8 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.92-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U534-52-1 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
402-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D100091-57-6 8/03/2121:418/02/21 7:56
9.92-Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U95-48-7 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.92-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U88-74-4 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.92-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U88-75-5 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.93,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U91-94-1 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.93-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U99-09-2 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.94-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U101-55-3 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.94-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U59-50-7 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.94-Chloroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U106-47-8 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.94-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U7005-72-3 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.94-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U100-01-6 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.94-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U100-02-7 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
40Acenaphtheneug/L EPA 8270D67083-32-9 8/03/2121:418/02/21 7:56
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 14 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6 E213107-04
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/28/21 12:40
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
2.0Acenaphthyleneug/L EPA 8270D5.4208-96-8 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9Acetophenoneug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U98-86-2 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
2.0Anthraceneug/L EPA 8270D7.4120-12-7 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9Atrazineug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U1912-24-9 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9Benzaldehydeug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U100-52-7 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
2.0Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U56-55-3 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
2.0Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U50-32-8 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
2.0Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U205-99-2 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
2.0Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U191-24-2 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
2.0Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U207-08-9 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9Benzyl alcohol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U100-51-6 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U, J, QL-385-68-7 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U108-60-1 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U111-91-1 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U111-44-4 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U117-81-7 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9Caprolactamug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U105-60-2 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
40Carbazoleug/L EPA 8270D42086-74-8 8/03/2121:418/02/21 7:56
2.0Chryseneug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U218-01-9 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
2.0Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U53-70-3 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
40Dibenzofuranug/L EPA 8270D350132-64-9 8/03/2121:418/02/21 7:56
9.9Diethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U84-66-2 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9Dimethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U131-11-3 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U84-74-2 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U117-84-0 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
2.0Fluorantheneug/L EPA 8270D11206-44-0 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
40Fluoreneug/L EPA 8270D23086-73-7 8/03/2121:418/02/21 7:56
9.9Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U, J, QL-3118-74-1 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U77-47-4 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 15 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6 E213107-04
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:7/28/21 12:40
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
9.9Hexachloroethaneug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U67-72-1 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
2.0Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U193-39-5 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9Isophoroneug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U78-59-1 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
2000Naphthaleneug/L EPA 8270D1400091-20-3 8/05/2118:318/02/21 7:56
9.9Nitrobenzeneug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U98-95-3 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U621-64-7 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U122-39-4 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
9.9Pentachlorophenolug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U87-86-5 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
40Phenanthreneug/L EPA 8270D17085-01-8 8/03/2121:418/02/21 7:56
9.9Phenolug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U108-95-2 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
2.0Pyreneug/L EPA 8270D6.7129-00-0 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
EPA 8270Dug/L20Cyclopentaphenanthrenone (TIC)NJR4-8000614 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
EPA 8270Dug/L90Dimethylnaphthalene (TIC)NJR4-6507 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
EPA 8270Dug/L10Methyldibenzofuran (TIC)NJR4-8000026 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
EPA 8270Dug/L30Phenanthridinone (TIC)NJR4-8000020 8/03/2119:018/02/21 7:56
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 16 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2108002 - E 3520 LLE
Blank (2108002-BLK1)Prepared: 08/02/21 Analyzed: 08/03/21
EPA 8270D
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/LU10 U
1,1-Biphenyl "U 2.0 U
1,4-Dioxane "U 2.0 U
1-Methylnaphthalene "U 2.0 U
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol "U 10 U
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol "U 10 U
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol "U 10 U
2,4-Dichlorophenol "U 10 U
2,4-Dimethylphenol "U 10 U
2,4-Dinitrophenol "U 20 U
2,4-Dinitrotoluene "U 10 U
2,6-Dinitrotoluene "U 10 U
2-Chloronaphthalene "U 10 U
2-Chlorophenol "U 10 U
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol "U 10 U
2-Methylnaphthalene "U 2.0 U
2-Methylphenol "U 10 U
2-Nitroaniline "U 10 U
2-Nitrophenol "U 10 U
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine "U 10 U
3-Nitroaniline "U 10 U
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether "U 10 U
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol "U 10 U
4-Chloroaniline "U 10 U
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether "U 10 U
4-Nitroaniline "U 10 U
4-Nitrophenol "U 10 U
Acenaphthene "U 2.0 U
Acenaphthylene "U 2.0 U
Acetophenone "U 10 U
Anthracene "U 2.0 U
Atrazine "U 10 U
Benzaldehyde "U 10 U
Benzo(a)anthracene "U 2.0 U
Benzo(a)pyrene "U 2.0 U
Benzo(b)fluoranthene "U 2.0 U
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene "U 2.0 U
Benzo(k)fluoranthene "U 2.0 U
Benzyl alcohol "U 10 U
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 17 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2108002 - E 3520 LLE
Blank (2108002-BLK1)Prepared: 08/02/21 Analyzed: 08/03/21
Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/LU10 U
Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether "U 10 U
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane "U 10 U
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether "U 10 U
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate "U 10 U
Caprolactam "U 10 U
Carbazole "U 2.0 U
Chrysene "U 2.0 U
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene "U 2.0 U
Dibenzofuran "U 2.0 U
Diethyl phthalate "U 10 U
Dimethyl phthalate "U 10 U
Di-n-butylphthalate "U 10 U
Di-n-octylphthalate "U 10 U
Fluoranthene "U 2.0 U
Fluorene "U 2.0 U
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)"U 10 U
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)"U 10 U
Hexachloroethane "U 10 U
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene "U 2.0 U
Isophorone "U 10 U
Naphthalene "U 2.0 U
Nitrobenzene "U 10 U
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine "U 10 U
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine "U 10 U
Pentachlorophenol "U 10 U
Phenanthrene "U 2.0 U
Phenol "U 10 U
Pyrene "U 2.0 U
Tentatively Identified Compounds "U 10 U
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 18 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2108002 - E 3520 LLE
LCS (2108002-BS1)Prepared: 08/02/21 Analyzed: 08/03/21
EPA 8270D
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L57.960 10 60.000 55-11196.6
1,1-Biphenyl "59.170 2.0 60.000 51-11898.6
1,4-Dioxane "40.820 2.0 60.000 41-8968.0
1-Methylnaphthalene "58.250 2.0 60.000 61-12797.1
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol "55.190 10 60.000 45-13492.0
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol "58.800 10 60.000 56-13198.0
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol "57.280 10 60.000 56-12895.5
2,4-Dichlorophenol "58.190 10 60.000 63-12397.0
2,4-Dimethylphenol "49.930 10 60.000 44-10683.2
2,4-Dinitrophenol "116.30 20 120.00 49-12896.9
2,4-Dinitrotoluene "61.570 10 60.000 58-125103
2,6-Dinitrotoluene "60.910 10 60.000 60-122102
2-Chloronaphthalene "56.940 10 60.000 53-11594.9
2-Chlorophenol "48.280 10 60.000 55-11780.5
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol "52.720 10 60.000 62-12587.9
2-Methylnaphthalene "57.580 2.0 60.000 56-11596.0
2-Methylphenol "52.200 10 60.000 52-11187.0
2-Nitroaniline "69.800 10 60.000 58-121116
2-Nitrophenol "53.790 10 60.000 58-12689.6
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine "44.800 10 60.000 10-14474.7
3-Nitroaniline "69.130 10 60.000 38-141115
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether "67.670 10 60.000 61-117113
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol "59.070 10 60.000 64-12298.4
4-Chloroaniline "37.010 10 60.000 18-10261.7
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether "70.040 10 60.000 55-117117
4-Nitroaniline "75.490 10 60.000 15-185126
4-Nitrophenol "51.980 10 60.000 38-13086.6
Acenaphthene "59.040 2.0 60.000 53-11598.4
Acenaphthylene "58.500 2.0 60.000 53-11897.5
Acetophenone "59.920 10 60.000 60-11299.9
Anthracene "59.590 2.0 60.000 65-11099.3
Atrazine "38.760 10 60.000 53-12864.6
Benzaldehyde "77.260 10 60.000 QC-255-152129
Benzo(a)anthracene "53.080 2.0 60.000 52-12188.5
Benzo(a)pyrene "56.390 2.0 60.000 60-11594.0
Benzo(b)fluoranthene "55.070 2.0 60.000 58-11791.8
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene "53.810 2.0 60.000 45-10189.7
Benzo(k)fluoranthene "57.600 2.0 60.000 64-12496.0
Benzyl alcohol "55.190 10 60.000 49-11492.0
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 19 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2108002 - E 3520 LLE
LCS (2108002-BS1)Prepared: 08/02/21 Analyzed: 08/03/21
Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L60.980 10 60.000 58-129102
Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether "64.360 10 60.000 55-113107
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane "59.690 10 60.000 59-11599.5
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether "59.810 10 60.000 53-11799.7
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate "61.860 10 60.000 56-130103
Caprolactam "46.950 10 60.000 33-9478.2
Carbazole "52.170 2.0 60.000 68-11487.0
Chrysene "54.340 2.0 60.000 58-12290.6
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene "45.740 2.0 60.000 46-11376.2
Dibenzofuran "60.050 2.0 60.000 50-133100
Diethyl phthalate "63.850 10 60.000 61-118106
Dimethyl phthalate "61.430 10 60.000 58-120102
Di-n-butylphthalate "65.900 10 60.000 63-117110
Di-n-octylphthalate "62.770 10 60.000 60-125105
Fluoranthene "60.700 2.0 60.000 68-113101
Fluorene "63.210 2.0 60.000 60-117105
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)"63.510 10 60.000 56-120106
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)"50.810 10 60.000 18-10384.7
Hexachloroethane "40.280 10 60.000 35-10567.1
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene "54.680 2.0 60.000 47-11091.1
Isophorone "61.270 10 60.000 60-114102
Naphthalene "57.300 2.0 60.000 55-11395.5
Nitrobenzene "57.700 10 60.000 59-11496.2
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine "58.510 10 60.000 58-11397.5
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine "57.090 10 60.000 65-11595.2
Pentachlorophenol "55.800 10 60.000 47-12293.0
Phenanthrene "59.300 2.0 60.000 63-11198.8
Phenol "55.280 10 60.000 47-10492.1
Pyrene "53.380 2.0 60.000 48-12989.0
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 20 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2108002 - E 3520 LLE
LCS Dup (2108002-BSD1)Prepared: 08/02/21 Analyzed: 08/03/21
EPA 8270D
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L57.950 10 60.000 3055-11196.6 0.0173
1,1-Biphenyl "57.370 2.0 60.000 1851-11895.6 3.09
1,4-Dioxane "43.740 2.0 60.000 5041-8972.9 6.91
1-Methylnaphthalene "56.340 2.0 60.000 2161-12793.9 3.33
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol "54.440 10 60.000 1245-13490.7 1.37
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol "59.850 10 60.000 1456-13199.8 1.77
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol "57.380 10 60.000 1656-12895.6 0.174
2,4-Dichlorophenol "58.840 10 60.000 2563-12398.1 1.11
2,4-Dimethylphenol "49.770 10 60.000 2744-10683.0 0.321
2,4-Dinitrophenol "117.28 20 120.00 1749-12897.7 0.839
2,4-Dinitrotoluene "61.880 10 60.000 1058-125103 0.502
2,6-Dinitrotoluene "61.350 10 60.000 1260-122102 0.720
2-Chloronaphthalene "53.850 10 60.000 1953-11589.8 5.58
2-Chlorophenol "50.420 10 60.000 3555-11784.0 4.34
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol "53.900 10 60.000 1262-12589.8 2.21
2-Methylnaphthalene "56.220 2.0 60.000 2256-11593.7 2.39
2-Methylphenol "53.180 10 60.000 3352-11188.6 1.86
2-Nitroaniline "69.510 10 60.000 1358-121116 0.416
2-Nitrophenol "54.680 10 60.000 2858-12691.1 1.64
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine "39.720 10 60.000 5310-14466.2 12.0
3-Nitroaniline "68.410 10 60.000 1938-141114 1.05
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether "61.130 10 60.000 1261-117102 10.2
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol "59.850 10 60.000 1764-12299.8 1.31
4-Chloroaniline "35.300 10 60.000 4918-10258.8 4.73
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether "61.750 10 60.000 1755-117103 12.6
4-Nitroaniline "71.800 10 60.000 1915-185120 5.01
4-Nitrophenol "50.860 10 60.000 2338-13084.8 2.18
Acenaphthene "57.220 2.0 60.000 1453-11595.4 3.13
Acenaphthylene "56.430 2.0 60.000 1453-11894.0 3.60
Acetophenone "60.760 10 60.000 2760-112101 1.39
Anthracene "56.890 2.0 60.000 1065-11094.8 4.64
Atrazine "39.330 10 60.000 2253-12865.6 1.46
Benzaldehyde "77.420 10 60.000 28 QC-255-152129 0.207
Benzo(a)anthracene "51.020 2.0 60.000 1052-12185.0 3.96
Benzo(a)pyrene "54.570 2.0 60.000 1060-11591.0 3.28
Benzo(b)fluoranthene "53.230 2.0 60.000 2258-11788.7 3.40
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene "51.010 2.0 60.000 2045-10185.0 5.34
Benzo(k)fluoranthene "56.220 2.0 60.000 1964-12493.7 2.42
Benzyl alcohol "56.240 10 60.000 3449-11493.7 1.88
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 21 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2108002 - E 3520 LLE
LCS Dup (2108002-BSD1)Prepared: 08/02/21 Analyzed: 08/03/21
Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L54.990 10 60.000 10 QL-358-12991.6 10.3
Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether "67.390 10 60.000 2055-113112 4.60
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane "61.060 10 60.000 2559-115102 2.27
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether "62.620 10 60.000 2453-117104 4.59
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate "55.640 10 60.000 3956-13092.7 10.6
Caprolactam "45.680 10 60.000 3633-9476.1 2.74
Carbazole "51.690 2.0 60.000 1468-11486.2 0.924
Chrysene "52.090 2.0 60.000 1058-12286.8 4.23
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene "43.430 2.0 60.000 2046-11372.4 5.18
Dibenzofuran "57.580 2.0 60.000 1350-13396.0 4.20
Diethyl phthalate "64.480 10 60.000 1061-118107 0.982
Dimethyl phthalate "61.610 10 60.000 1158-120103 0.293
Di-n-butylphthalate "59.950 10 60.000 1163-11799.9 9.46
Di-n-octylphthalate "56.190 10 60.000 1260-12593.6 11.1
Fluoranthene "58.930 2.0 60.000 1068-11398.2 2.96
Fluorene "60.020 2.0 60.000 1260-117100 5.18
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)"55.050 10 60.000 12 QL-356-12091.8 14.3
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)"45.580 10 60.000 3218-10376.0 10.9
Hexachloroethane "44.230 10 60.000 4535-10573.7 9.35
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene "53.070 2.0 60.000 2047-11088.4 2.99
Isophorone "61.970 10 60.000 2060-114103 1.14
Naphthalene "56.950 2.0 60.000 2755-11394.9 0.613
Nitrobenzene "58.950 10 60.000 2959-11498.2 2.14
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine "59.370 10 60.000 2458-11399.0 1.46
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine "55.000 10 60.000 1065-11591.7 3.73
Pentachlorophenol "54.170 10 60.000 1147-12290.3 2.96
Phenanthrene "56.920 2.0 60.000 1063-11194.9 4.10
Phenol "55.230 10 60.000 3847-10492.0 0.0905
Pyrene "51.600 2.0 60.000 1048-12986.0 3.39
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 22 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2108002 - E 3520 LLE
Duplicate (2108002-DUP1)Prepared: 08/02/21 Analyzed: 08/03/21 Source: E213107-01
EPA 8270D
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/LU10 U 200 U
1,1-Biphenyl "97.602 2.0 108.23 20010.3
1,4-Dioxane "U 2.0 U 200 U
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2,4-Dichlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2,4-Dimethylphenol "U 10 U 200 U
2,4-Dinitrophenol "U 20 U 200 U
2,4-Dinitrotoluene "U 10 U 200 U
2,6-Dinitrotoluene "U 10 U 200 U
2-Chloronaphthalene "U 10 U 200 U
2-Chlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2-Methylphenol "U 10 U 200 U
2-Nitroaniline "U 10 U 200 U
2-Nitrophenol "U 10 U 200 U
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine "U 10 U 200 U
3-Nitroaniline "U 10 U 200 U
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether "U 10 U 200 U
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol "U 10 U 200 U
4-Chloroaniline "U 10 U 200 U
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether "U 10 U 200 U
4-Nitroaniline "U 10 U 200 U
4-Nitrophenol "U 10 U 200 U
Acenaphthylene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Acetophenone "U 10 U 200 U
Anthracene "3.3831 2.0 3.7158 2009.37
Atrazine "U 10 U 200 U
Benzaldehyde "U 10 U 200 U
Benzo(a)anthracene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Benzo(a)pyrene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Benzo(b)fluoranthene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Benzo(k)fluoranthene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Benzyl alcohol "U 10 U 200 U
Benzyl butyl phthalate "U 10 U 200 QL-3, J,
U
Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether "U 10 U 200 U
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 23 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2108002 - E 3520 LLE
Duplicate (2108002-DUP1)Prepared: 08/02/21 Analyzed: 08/03/21 Source: E213107-01
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/LU10 U 200 U
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether "U 10 U 200 U
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Caprolactam "U 10 U 200 U
Chrysene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Diethyl phthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Dimethyl phthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Di-n-butylphthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Di-n-octylphthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Fluoranthene "9.1244 2.0 10.463 20013.7
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)"U 10 U 200 QL-3, J,
U
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)"U 10 U 200 U
Hexachloroethane "U 10 U 200 U
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Isophorone "U 10 U 200 U
Nitrobenzene "U 10 U 200 U
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine "U 10 U 200 U
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine "U 10 U 200 U
Pentachlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
Phenol "U 10 U 200 U
Pyrene "4.9950 2.0 5.5895 20011.2
Dimethylnaphthalene (TIC)"61.891 65.684 NJ5.95
Phenanthridinone (TIC)"12.637 11.895 NJ6.05
Tentatively Identified Compounds "U 10 U 200 U
Thebenidinone (TIC)"19.602 NJ200
Duplicate (2108002-DUP2)Prepared: 08/02/21 Analyzed: 08/03/21 Source: E213107-01RE1
EPA 8270D
1-Methylnaphthalene ug/L404.18 40 421.89 2004.29
2-Methylnaphthalene "779.50 40 807.58 2003.54
Acenaphthene "454.13 40 466.11 2002.60
Carbazole "134.53 40 142.95 2006.07
Dibenzofuran "260.70 40 262.11 2000.539
Fluorene "177.11 40 185.47 2004.61
Phenanthrene "200.40 40 210.53 2004.93
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 24 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2108002 - E 3520 LLE
Duplicate (2108002-DUP3)Prepared: 08/02/21 Analyzed: 08/05/21 Source: E213107-01RE2
EPA 8270D
Naphthalene ug/L5023.9 200 5062.1 2000.758
MRL Verification (2108002-PS1)Prepared: 08/02/21 Analyzed: 08/03/21
EPA 8270D
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L6.7600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J48-10567.6
1,1-Biphenyl "1.3800 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J50-10469.0
1,4-Dioxane "1.0700 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J14-11053.5
1-Methylnaphthalene "1.3100 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J56-11765.5
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol "8.2600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J31-11182.6
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol "7.5000 10 10.000 MRL-2, J42-11575.0
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol "7.3500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J47-11073.5
2,4-Dichlorophenol "7.0600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J49-11670.6
2,4-Dimethylphenol "5.9900 10 10.000 MRL-2, J16-11159.9
2,4-Dinitrophenol "16.670 20 20.000 MRL-2, J10-12483.4
2,4-Dinitrotoluene "7.6200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J53-10876.2
2,6-Dinitrotoluene "7.7500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J55-10677.5
2-Chloronaphthalene "7.1600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J51-10471.6
2-Chlorophenol "6.9600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J46-11169.6
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol "8.0600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J26-11680.6
2-Methylnaphthalene "1.2100 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J51-10660.5
2-Methylphenol "7.1500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J42-10871.5
2-Nitroaniline "8.9600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J48-10989.6
2-Nitrophenol "6.9100 10 10.000 MRL-2, J46-12069.1
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine "5.6600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J10-10356.6
3-Nitroaniline "8.7400 10 10.000 MRL-2, J28-11887.4
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether "8.2400 10 10.000 MRL-2, J58-10682.4
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol "7.2200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J49-11872.2
4-Chloroaniline "4.9800 10 10.000 MRL-2, J20-8549.8
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether "7.9700 10 10.000 MRL-2, J49-10279.7
4-Nitroaniline "10.120 10 10.000 MRL-210-165101
4-Nitrophenol "8.2200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J11-11682.2
Acenaphthene "1.3600 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J51-10068.0
Acenaphthylene "1.3600 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J52-10468.0
Acetophenone "7.2700 10 10.000 MRL-2, J56-10872.7
Anthracene "1.4100 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J48-10870.5
Atrazine "5.4600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J46-12654.6
Benzaldehyde "12.350 10 10.000 MRL-2,
QC-2
40-169124
Benzo(a)anthracene "1.4700 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J52-11773.5
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 25 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2108002 - E 3520 LLE
MRL Verification (2108002-PS1)Prepared: 08/02/21 Analyzed: 08/03/21
Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L1.5900 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J48-11679.5
Benzo(b)fluoranthene "1.7500 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J31-14287.5
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene "1.6400 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J37-11582.0
Benzo(k)fluoranthene "1.5000 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J29-14575.0
Benzyl alcohol "7.2300 10 10.000 MRL-2, J12-13372.3
Benzyl butyl phthalate "10.110 10 10.000 MRL-260-136101
Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether "8.7900 10 10.000 MRL-2, J48-10787.9
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane "7.3200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J53-10773.2
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether "8.6700 10 10.000 MRL-2, J47-10486.7
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate "9.1400 10 10.000 MRL-2, J19-17991.4
Caprolactam "7.0200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J32-8770.2
Carbazole "1.3700 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J67-11968.5
Chrysene "1.5900 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J55-11679.5
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene "1.2600 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J33-11863.0
Dibenzofuran "1.3000 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J53-11365.0
Diethyl phthalate "8.9400 10 10.000 MRL-2, J53-12989.4
Dimethyl phthalate "8.0500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J59-10780.5
Di-n-butylphthalate "9.3500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J69-13993.5
Di-n-octylphthalate "9.5000 10 10.000 MRL-2, J62-12995.0
Fluoranthene "1.4100 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J60-11270.5
Fluorene "1.3300 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J55-10166.5
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)"8.1200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J50-10581.2
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)"6.8700 10 10.000 MRL-2, J10-8568.7
Hexachloroethane "4.8400 10 10.000 MRL-2, J26-8948.4
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene "1.5600 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J37-11478.0
Isophorone "7.9600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J54-10879.6
Naphthalene "1.4900 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J38-13774.5
Nitrobenzene "7.5900 10 10.000 MRL-2, J54-11075.9
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine "8.1800 10 10.000 MRL-2, J49-10681.8
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine "7.3300 10 10.000 MRL-2, J55-10773.3
Pentachlorophenol "8.1200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J20-13681.2
Phenanthrene "1.4000 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J55-11570.0
Phenol "7.2800 10 10.000 MRL-2, J44-9772.8
Pyrene "1.5800 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J51-12279.0
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 26 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0304
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0304, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Notes and Definitions for QC Samples
U The analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit.
J The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
MRL-2 MRL verification for Non-Potable Water matrix
NJ Presumptive evidence that analyte is present; reported as a tentative identification with an estimated value.
QC-2 Analyte concentration high in continuing calibration verification standard
QL-3 Laboratory Control Spike Precision outside method control limits
8/12/21 17:02E213107 SVOA FINAL 08 12 21 1702Page 27 of 27
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
February 2, 2022
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
FROM:
FINAL Analytical Report
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote
4LSASD-QAPSB
Denise Goddard
Quality Assurance Section, Chemist
Quality Assurance Section
Floyd Wellborn, ChiefTHRU:
TO:Joydeb Majumder
Attached are the final results for the analytical groups listed below. These analyses were performed in accordance with
the associated contract Statement Of Work (SOW). In general, project data quality objectives have not been used to
evaluate these data prior to release by the Quality Assurance Section. For a listing of specific data qualifiers and
explanations, please refer to the Data Qualifier Definitions included in this report.
Analyses Included in this report:Method Used:
Dissolved Metals (DMTL)
Dissolved Metals Contract SOW (Water)
Total Metals (TMTL)
Total Metals CLP Inorganics (Water)
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 1 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Report Narrative for Work Order: C215305 Analysis: DMTL
Inorganic Data Review and Validation Report
Site Name: Holcomb Creosote, Yadkinville, NC
Case No.: 49820, Project No.: 22-0051, Work Order Nos.: C215304 (PES), C215305
ELEMENT Sample IDs.: C215304-01-02 (PES), C215305-01-16
Sampling Date(s): 9/14/21-10/13/21
Validated Time of Sample Receipt: 12/1/21
Laboratory Performing Inorganic Analyses: Chemtech Consulting Group, Mountainside, NJ
Date Received from Lab: 12/21/21 (SMO portal)
Analyses conducted: Total Metals and Dissolved Metals (ICP-AES)

The ESAT Work Team has reviewed the above-captioned CLP data package consisting of 18 water samples for total and/or dissolved
metals by ICP-AES analyses according to the contract Statement of Work SFAM01.1 (SOW) and EPA guidelines. This package presents
acceptable contractual and technical performance with qualifications. Additional details are provided below.
The samples were collected between 9/14/21 and 10/13/21 but were not received by the laboratory until 12/1/21.
Examination of laboratory blanks revealed apparent low-level contamination with several metals. Reported detection limits were adjusted
as high as ten times the blank levels to discount possible false positives due to contamination in laboratory blanks.
ICP-AES Analysis
PE Sample Results
The PES recoveries for total metals were scored as within limits by the web-based SPS Web software except for chromium which was
scored warning high in one PES only. All detected chromium results were considered estimated and “J” qualified.
Other QA/QC Results
The sampler did not use separate CLP Nos. as instructed for total and dissolved metals samples so the laboratory was instructed to do so.
Generally, the total metals results were approximately the same results or greater than dissolved metals as expected. However, manganese
was reported as 19,000 ug/L in sample C215305-16 (DBLS6 - dissolved) but 4600 ug/L in sample C215305-15 (DBLR5 - total) for
MW-6_101321 collected 10/13/21 at 15:18. The pH for both samples was measured as <2 by laboratory at the time of digestion. These
reported results were consistent with the raw data submitted.
The laboratory addressed this issue stating that both the samples were analyzed again and “got the same results… [and] suspects the
sampler might have accidentally interchanged total for dissolved and dissolved for total for those two samples as we could see clearly
that the digestate for total metals is lighter in color and the digestate for dissolved is darker.”
A Stage 4 validation consisting of manual review was performed on the inorganic samples submitted for this case.
cc: Nardina Turner
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 2 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Date CollectedMatrixLaboratory IDSample ID
SAMPLES INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
MD#D#
BLR1BLR1MW-2_091421 C215305-01 Groundwater 9/14/21 13:13
BLS2BLS2MW-2_091421_Dis C215305-02 Groundwater 9/14/21 13:13
BLR8BLR8MW-2_101321 C215305-03 Groundwater 10/13/21 15:25
BLS3BLS3MW-2_101321_Dis C215305-04 Groundwater 10/13/21 15:25
BLR2BLR2MW-57_091421 C215305-05 Groundwater 9/14/21 14:20
BLS0BLS0MW-57_091421_Dis C215305-06 Groundwater 9/14/21 14:20
BLR7BLR7MW-57_101321 C215305-07 Groundwater 10/13/21 17:10
BLS4BLS4MW-57_101321_Dis C215305-08 Groundwater 10/13/21 17:10
BLR3BLR3MW-58_091421 C215305-09 Groundwater 9/14/21 15:38
BLR9BLR9MW-58_091421_Dis C215305-10 Groundwater 9/14/21 15:38
BLR6BLR6MW-58_101321 C215305-11 Groundwater 10/13/21 17:28
BLS5BLS5MW-58_101321_Dis C215305-12 Groundwater 10/13/21 17:28
BLR4BLR4MW-6_091421 C215305-13 Groundwater 9/14/21 17:09
BLS1BLS1MW-6_091421_Dis C215305-14 Groundwater 9/14/21 17:09
BLR5BLR5MW-6_101321 C215305-15 Groundwater 10/13/21 15:18
BLS6BLS6MW-6_101321_Dis C215305-16 Groundwater 10/13/21 15:18
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 3 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
DATA QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS
U The analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit.
CLP26 PE sample recovery scored as warning-high.
CLP36 Identification/Concentration of analyte not confirmed by ICP-MS.
J The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
Q-2 Result greater than MDL but less than MRL.
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
CAS Chemical Abstracts Service
Note: Analytes with no known CAS identifiers have been assigned codes beginning with "E", the EPA ID as assigned by
the EPA Substance Registry System (www.epa.gov/srs), or beginning with "R4-", a unique identifier assigned by the EPA
Region 4 laboratory.
MDL Method Detection Limit - The minimum concentration of a substance (an analyte) that can be measured and
reported with a 99% confidence that the analyte concentration is greater than zero.
MRL Minimum Reporting Limit - Analyte concentration that corresponds to the lowest demonstrated level of acceptable
quantitation. The MRL is sample-specific and accounts for preparation weights and volumes, dilutions, and
moisture content of soil/sediments.
TIC Tentatively Identified Compound - An analyte identified based on a match with the instrument software's mass
spectral library. A calibration standard has not been analyzed to confirm the compound's identification or the
estimated concentration reported.
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 4 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Total Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2_091421 C215305-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 13:13
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
D No: BLR1 CHX
MD No: BLR1 CHX
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/01/21Aluminumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/01/21Antimonyug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/01/21Arsenicug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/01/21Bariumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P58J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/01/21Berylliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/01/21Cadmiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/01/21Calciumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P54007440-70-2
10 12/01/21Chromiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-47-3
50 12/01/21Cobaltug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P16J, Q-27440-48-4
25 12/01/21Copperug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/01/21Ironug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P130007439-89-6
10 12/01/21Leadug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7439-92-1
5000 12/01/21Magnesiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1300J, Q-27439-95-4
15 12/01/21Manganeseug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P27007439-96-5
40 12/01/21Nickelug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P40U7440-02-0
5000 12/01/21Potassiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2500J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/01/21Seleniumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U7782-49-2
10 12/01/21Silverug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/01/21Sodiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P76007440-23-5
25 12/01/21Thalliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/01/21Vanadiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/01/21Zincug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-66-6
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 5 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Dissolved Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2_091421_Dis C215305-02
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 13:13
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
D No: BLS2 CHX
MD No: BLS2 CHX
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/06/21Aluminumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/06/21Antimonyug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/06/21Arsenicug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/06/21Bariumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P59J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/06/21Berylliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/06/21Cadmiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/06/21Calciumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P55007440-70-2
10 12/06/21Chromiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-47-3
50 12/06/21Cobaltug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P15J, Q-27440-48-4
25 12/06/21Copperug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/06/21Ironug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P130007439-89-6
10 12/06/21Leadug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7439-92-1
5000 12/06/21Magnesiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1400J, Q-27439-95-4
15 12/06/21Manganeseug/L 12/08/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P29007439-96-5
40 12/06/21Nickelug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P40U7440-02-0
5000 12/06/21Potassiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2500J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/06/21Seleniumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U7782-49-2
10 12/06/21Silverug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/06/21Sodiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P79007440-23-5
25 12/06/21Thalliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/06/21Vanadiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/06/21Zincug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-66-6
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 6 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Total Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2_101321 C215305-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 15:25
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
D No: BLR8 CHX
MD No: BLR8 CHX
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/01/21Aluminumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2807429-90-5
60 12/01/21Antimonyug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/01/21Arsenicug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/01/21Bariumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P69J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/01/21Berylliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/01/21Cadmiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/01/21Calciumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P63007440-70-2
10 12/01/21Chromiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-47-3
50 12/01/21Cobaltug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P19J, Q-27440-48-4
25 12/01/21Copperug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/01/21Ironug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P150007439-89-6
10 12/01/21Leadug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7439-92-1
5000 12/01/21Magnesiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1800J, Q-27439-95-4
15 12/01/21Manganeseug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P36007439-96-5
40 12/01/21Nickelug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P40U7440-02-0
5000 12/01/21Potassiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2900J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/01/21Seleniumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U7782-49-2
10 12/01/21Silverug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/01/21Sodiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P86007440-23-5
25 12/01/21Thalliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/01/21Vanadiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/01/21Zincug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-66-6
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 7 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Dissolved Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2_101321_Dis C215305-04
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 15:25
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
D No: BLS3 CHX
MD No: BLS3 CHX
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/06/21Aluminumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/06/21Antimonyug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/06/21Arsenicug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/06/21Bariumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P63J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/06/21Berylliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/06/21Cadmiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/06/21Calciumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P63007440-70-2
10 12/06/21Chromiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-47-3
50 12/06/21Cobaltug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P19J, Q-27440-48-4
25 12/06/21Copperug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/06/21Ironug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P150007439-89-6
10 12/06/21Leadug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7439-92-1
5000 12/06/21Magnesiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1700J, Q-27439-95-4
15 12/06/21Manganeseug/L 12/08/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35007439-96-5
40 12/06/21Nickelug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P40U7440-02-0
5000 12/06/21Potassiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2700J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/06/21Seleniumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U7782-49-2
10 12/06/21Silverug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/06/21Sodiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P86007440-23-5
25 12/06/21Thalliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/06/21Vanadiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/06/21Zincug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-66-6
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 8 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Total Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57_091421 C215305-05
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 14:20
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
D No: BLR2 CHX
MD No: BLR2 CHX
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/01/21Aluminumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/01/21Antimonyug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/01/21Arsenicug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/01/21Bariumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P62J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/01/21Berylliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/01/21Cadmiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/01/21Calciumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P63007440-70-2
10 12/01/21Chromiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-47-3
50 12/01/21Cobaltug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-48-4
25 12/01/21Copperug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/01/21Ironug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P9007439-89-6
10 12/01/21Leadug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7439-92-1
5000 12/01/21Magnesiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1400J, Q-27439-95-4
15 12/01/21Manganeseug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P8207439-96-5
40 12/01/21Nickelug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P40U7440-02-0
5000 12/01/21Potassiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1600J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/01/21Seleniumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U7782-49-2
10 12/01/21Silverug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/01/21Sodiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P74007440-23-5
25 12/01/21Thalliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/01/21Vanadiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/01/21Zincug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-66-6
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 9 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Dissolved Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57_091421_Dis C215305-06
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 14:20
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
D No: BLS0 CHX
MD No: BLS0 CHX
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/06/21Aluminumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/06/21Antimonyug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/06/21Arsenicug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/06/21Bariumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P61J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/06/21Berylliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/06/21Cadmiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/06/21Calciumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P63007440-70-2
10 12/06/21Chromiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-47-3
50 12/06/21Cobaltug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-48-4
25 12/06/21Copperug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/06/21Ironug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P8507439-89-6
10 12/06/21Leadug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7439-92-1
5000 12/06/21Magnesiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1400J, Q-27439-95-4
15 12/06/21Manganeseug/L 12/08/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P8807439-96-5
40 12/06/21Nickelug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P40U7440-02-0
5000 12/06/21Potassiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1500J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/06/21Seleniumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U7782-49-2
10 12/06/21Silverug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/06/21Sodiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P73007440-23-5
25 12/06/21Thalliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/06/21Vanadiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/06/21Zincug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-66-6
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 10 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Total Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57_101321 C215305-07
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 17:10
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
D No: BLR7 CHX
MD No: BLR7 CHX
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/01/21Aluminumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/01/21Antimonyug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/01/21Arsenicug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P7.3 J, CLP36, Q-27440-38-2
200 12/01/21Bariumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P7107440-39-3
5.0 12/01/21Berylliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/01/21Cadmiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/01/21Calciumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1500007440-70-2
10 12/01/21Chromiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P150J, CLP267440-47-3
50 12/01/21Cobaltug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-48-4
25 12/01/21Copperug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/01/21Ironug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P100U7439-89-6
10 12/01/21Leadug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P317439-92-1
5000 12/01/21Magnesiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P390007439-95-4
750 12/01/21Manganeseug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P3300007439-96-5
40 12/01/21Nickelug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P32J, Q-27440-02-0
5000 12/01/21Potassiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P57007440-09-7
35 12/01/21Seleniumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P170CLP367782-49-2
10 12/01/21Silverug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P787440-22-4
5000 12/01/21Sodiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P980007440-23-5
25 12/01/21Thalliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P130CLP367440-28-0
50 12/01/21Vanadiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/01/21Zincug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P53J, Q-27440-66-6
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 11 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Dissolved Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57_101321_Dis C215305-08
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 17:10
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
D No: BLS4 CHX
MD No: BLS4 CHX
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/06/21Aluminumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/06/21Antimonyug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/06/21Arsenicug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P8.2 J, CLP36, Q-27440-38-2
200 12/06/21Bariumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5107440-39-3
5.0 12/06/21Berylliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/06/21Cadmiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1.2 J, Q-27440-43-9
5000 12/06/21Calciumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1600007440-70-2
10 12/06/21Chromiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P160J, CLP267440-47-3
50 12/06/21Cobaltug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-48-4
25 12/06/21Copperug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/06/21Ironug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P100U7439-89-6
10 12/06/21Leadug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P347439-92-1
5000 12/06/21Magnesiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P400007439-95-4
750 12/06/21Manganeseug/L 12/08/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P3600007439-96-5
40 12/06/21Nickelug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P34J, Q-27440-02-0
5000 12/06/21Potassiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P57007440-09-7
35 12/06/21Seleniumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P180CLP367782-49-2
10 12/06/21Silverug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P837440-22-4
5000 12/06/21Sodiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1000007440-23-5
25 12/06/21Thalliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P140CLP367440-28-0
50 12/06/21Vanadiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/06/21Zincug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P41J, Q-27440-66-6
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 12 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Total Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58_091421 C215305-09
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 15:38
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
D No: BLR3 CHX
MD No: BLR3 CHX
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/01/21Aluminumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/01/21Antimonyug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/01/21Arsenicug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/01/21Bariumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P98J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/01/21Berylliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/01/21Cadmiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/01/21Calciumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P84007440-70-2
10 12/01/21Chromiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-47-3
50 12/01/21Cobaltug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-48-4
25 12/01/21Copperug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/01/21Ironug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P26007439-89-6
10 12/01/21Leadug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7439-92-1
5000 12/01/21Magnesiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2300J, Q-27439-95-4
15 12/01/21Manganeseug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P17007439-96-5
40 12/01/21Nickelug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P40U7440-02-0
5000 12/01/21Potassiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2300J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/01/21Seleniumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U7782-49-2
10 12/01/21Silverug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/01/21Sodiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P73007440-23-5
25 12/01/21Thalliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/01/21Vanadiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/01/21Zincug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-66-6
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 13 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Dissolved Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58_091421_Dis C215305-10
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 15:38
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
D No: BLR9 CHX
MD No: BLR9 CHX
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/06/21Aluminumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/06/21Antimonyug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/06/21Arsenicug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/06/21Bariumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P100J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/06/21Berylliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/06/21Cadmiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/06/21Calciumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P90007440-70-2
10 12/06/21Chromiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-47-3
50 12/06/21Cobaltug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-48-4
25 12/06/21Copperug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/06/21Ironug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25007439-89-6
10 12/06/21Leadug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7439-92-1
5000 12/06/21Magnesiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2400J, Q-27439-95-4
15 12/06/21Manganeseug/L 12/08/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P18007439-96-5
40 12/06/21Nickelug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P40U7440-02-0
5000 12/06/21Potassiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2400J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/06/21Seleniumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U7782-49-2
10 12/06/21Silverug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/06/21Sodiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P78007440-23-5
25 12/06/21Thalliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/06/21Vanadiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/06/21Zincug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-66-6
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 14 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Total Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58_101321 C215305-11
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 17:28
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
D No: BLR6 CHX
MD No: BLR6 CHX
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/01/21Aluminumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/01/21Antimonyug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/01/21Arsenicug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P22CLP367440-38-2
200 12/01/21Bariumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P15007440-39-3
5.0 12/01/21Berylliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/01/21Cadmiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2.8 J, Q-27440-43-9
5000 12/01/21Calciumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1600007440-70-2
10 12/01/21Chromiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P370J, CLP267440-47-3
50 12/01/21Cobaltug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-48-4
25 12/01/21Copperug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/01/21Ironug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P100U7439-89-6
10 12/01/21Leadug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P777439-92-1
5000 12/01/21Magnesiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P380007439-95-4
1500 12/01/21Manganeseug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P8400007439-96-5
40 12/01/21Nickelug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P797440-02-0
5000 12/01/21Potassiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P110007440-09-7
35 12/01/21Seleniumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P410CLP367782-49-2
10 12/01/21Silverug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2007440-22-4
5000 12/01/21Sodiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P3700007440-23-5
25 12/01/21Thalliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P320CLP367440-28-0
50 12/01/21Vanadiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/01/21Zincug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P637440-66-6
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 15 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Dissolved Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58_101321_Dis C215305-12
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 17:28
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
D No: BLS5 CHX
MD No: BLS5 CHX
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/06/21Aluminumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/06/21Antimonyug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/06/21Arsenicug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P22CLP367440-38-2
200 12/06/21Bariumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P13007440-39-3
5.0 12/06/21Berylliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/06/21Cadmiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2.8 J, Q-27440-43-9
5000 12/06/21Calciumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1600007440-70-2
10 12/06/21Chromiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P390J, CLP267440-47-3
50 12/06/21Cobaltug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-48-4
25 12/06/21Copperug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/06/21Ironug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P100U7439-89-6
10 12/06/21Leadug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P787439-92-1
5000 12/06/21Magnesiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P390007439-95-4
1500 12/06/21Manganeseug/L 12/08/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P8400007439-96-5
40 12/06/21Nickelug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P817440-02-0
5000 12/06/21Potassiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P110007440-09-7
35 12/06/21Seleniumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P420CLP367782-49-2
10 12/06/21Silverug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2007440-22-4
5000 12/06/21Sodiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P3800007440-23-5
25 12/06/21Thalliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P340CLP367440-28-0
50 12/06/21Vanadiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/06/21Zincug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P47J, Q-27440-66-6
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 16 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Total Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6_091421 C215305-13
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 17:09
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
D No: BLR4 CHX
MD No: BLR4 CHX
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/01/21Aluminumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/01/21Antimonyug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/01/21Arsenicug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/01/21Bariumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P120J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/01/21Berylliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/01/21Cadmiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/01/21Calciumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2300J, Q-27440-70-2
10 12/01/21Chromiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-47-3
50 12/01/21Cobaltug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-48-4
25 12/01/21Copperug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/01/21Ironug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P54007439-89-6
10 12/01/21Leadug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7439-92-1
5000 12/01/21Magnesiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P950J, Q-27439-95-4
15 12/01/21Manganeseug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P18007439-96-5
40 12/01/21Nickelug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P40U7440-02-0
5000 12/01/21Potassiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1600J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/01/21Seleniumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U7782-49-2
10 12/01/21Silverug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/01/21Sodiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P83007440-23-5
25 12/01/21Thalliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/01/21Vanadiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/01/21Zincug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-66-6
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 17 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Dissolved Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6_091421_Dis C215305-14
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 17:09
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
D No: BLS1 CHX
MD No: BLS1 CHX
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/06/21Aluminumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/06/21Antimonyug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/06/21Arsenicug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/06/21Bariumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P110J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/06/21Berylliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/06/21Cadmiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/06/21Calciumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2300J, Q-27440-70-2
10 12/06/21Chromiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-47-3
50 12/06/21Cobaltug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-48-4
25 12/06/21Copperug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/06/21Ironug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P51007439-89-6
10 12/06/21Leadug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7439-92-1
5000 12/06/21Magnesiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P910J, Q-27439-95-4
15 12/06/21Manganeseug/L 12/08/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P19007439-96-5
40 12/06/21Nickelug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P40U7440-02-0
5000 12/06/21Potassiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1600J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/06/21Seleniumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U7782-49-2
10 12/06/21Silverug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/06/21Sodiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P82007440-23-5
25 12/06/21Thalliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/06/21Vanadiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/06/21Zincug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-66-6
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 18 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Total Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6_101321 C215305-15
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 15:18
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
D No: BLR5 CHX
MD No: BLR5 CHX
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/01/21Aluminumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/01/21Antimonyug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/01/21Arsenicug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/01/21Bariumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7440-39-3
5.0 12/01/21Berylliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/01/21Cadmiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/01/21Calciumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2500J, Q-27440-70-2
10 12/01/21Chromiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P61J, CLP267440-47-3
50 12/01/21Cobaltug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-48-4
25 12/01/21Copperug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/01/21Ironug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P100U7439-89-6
10 12/01/21Leadug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7439-92-1
5000 12/01/21Magnesiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1300J, Q-27439-95-4
15 12/01/21Manganeseug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P46007439-96-5
40 12/01/21Nickelug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P40U7440-02-0
5000 12/01/21Potassiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P3400J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/01/21Seleniumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U7782-49-2
10 12/01/21Silverug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/01/21Sodiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P930007440-23-5
25 12/01/21Thalliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/01/21Vanadiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/01/21Zincug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-66-6
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 19 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0051
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Dissolved Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6_101321_Dis C215305-16
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 15:18
Project: 22-0051, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49820
D No: BLS6 CHX
MD No: BLS6 CHX
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/06/21Aluminumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/06/21Antimonyug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/06/21Arsenicug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/06/21Bariumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7440-39-3
5.0 12/06/21Berylliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/06/21Cadmiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/06/21Calciumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2200J, Q-27440-70-2
10 12/06/21Chromiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P62J, CLP267440-47-3
50 12/06/21Cobaltug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-48-4
25 12/06/21Copperug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/06/21Ironug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P100U7439-89-6
10 12/06/21Leadug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7439-92-1
5000 12/06/21Magnesiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1200J, Q-27439-95-4
30 12/06/21Manganeseug/L 12/08/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P190007439-96-5
40 12/06/21Nickelug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P40U7440-02-0
5000 12/06/21Potassiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P3300J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/06/21Seleniumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P13J, CLP36, Q-27782-49-2
10 12/06/21Silverug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P4.9 J, Q-27440-22-4
5000 12/06/21Sodiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P920007440-23-5
25 12/06/21Thalliumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P7.4 J, CLP36, Q-27440-28-0
50 12/06/21Vanadiumug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/06/21Zincug/L 12/07/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P22J, Q-27440-66-6
2/2/22 10:15C215305 DMTL TMTL FINAL 02 02 22 1015Page 20 of 20
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
September 28, 2021
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
FROM:
FINAL Analytical Report
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote
Stacie Masters
LSB Organic Chemistry Section Chief
Laboratory Services Branch
John Deatrick, ChiefTHRU:
TO:Joydeb Majumder
Attached are the final results for the analytical groups listed below. This report shall not be reproduced except in
full without approval of the Region 4 laboratory. These analyses were performed in accordance with the
Laboratory Services Branch's Laboratory Operations and Quality Assurance Manual (LSB LOQAM) found at
www.epa.gov/region4/sesd/asbsop. Any unique project data quality objectives specified in writing by the data
requestor have also been incorporated into the data unless otherwise noted in the Report Narrative. Chemistry
data have been verified based on the LSB LOQAM specifications and have been qualified by this laboratory if
the applicable quality control criteria were not met. Verification is defined in Chapter 5 of the LSB LOQAM. For
a listing of specific data qualifiers and explanations, please refer to the Data Qualifier Definitions included in
this report. The reported results are accurate within the limits of the method(s) and are representative only of the
samples as received by the laboratory.
Analyses Included in this report:Method Used:Accreditations:
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA)
Semivolatile organic compounds ISOEPA 8270D (Water)
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 1 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Sample Disposal Policy
Due to limited space for long term sample storage, LSB’s policy is to dispose of samples on a periodic schedule.
Air samples collected in summa canisters will be disposed of 30 days following the issuance of this report. All
other sample media including original samples, sample extracts and or digestates will be disposed of, in
accordance with applicable regulations, 60 days from the date of this report.
This sample disposal policy does not apply to criminal samples which are held until the laboratory is notified by
the criminal investigators that case development and litigation are complete.
These samples may be held in the laboratory's custody for a longer period of time. If samples require storage
beyond the 60-day period, please contact the Sample Control Coordinator by e-mail at
[e-mail].
cc: Nardina Turner
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 2 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Date ReceivedDate CollectedMatrixLaboratory IDSample ID
SAMPLES INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote
MW-2 E213804-01 Groundwater 9/14/21 13:13 9/15/21 13:05
MW-57 E213804-02 Groundwater 9/14/21 14:20 9/15/21 13:05
MW-58 E213804-03 Groundwater 9/14/21 15:38 9/15/21 13:05
MW-6 E213804-04 Groundwater 9/14/21 17:09 9/15/21 13:05
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 3 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
DATA QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS
U The analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit.
J The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
NJ Presumptive evidence that analyte is present; reported as a tentative identification with an estimated value.
Q-2 Result greater than MDL but less than MRL.
QL-1 Laboratory Control Spike Recovery less than method control limits
QL-2 Laboratory Control Spike Recovery greater than method control limits
QR-1 MRL verification recovery less than lower control limits.
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 4 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
CAS Chemical Abstracts Service
Note: Analytes with no known CAS identifiers have been assigned codes beginning with "E", the EPA ID as assigned by
the EPA Substance Registry System (www.epa.gov/srs), or beginning with "R4-", a unique identifier assigned by the EPA
Region 4 laboratory.
MDL Method Detection Limit - The minimum concentration of a substance (an analyte) that can be measured and
reported with a 99% confidence that the analyte concentration is greater than zero.
MRL Minimum Reporting Limit - Analyte concentration that corresponds to the lowest demonstrated level of acceptable
quantitation. The MRL is sample-specific and accounts for preparation weights and volumes, dilutions, and
moisture content of soil/sediments.
TIC Tentatively Identified Compound - An analyte identified based on a match with the instrument software's mass
spectral library. A calibration standard has not been analyzed to confirm the compound's identification or the
estimated concentration reported.
ACCREDITATIONS:
ISO Accredited to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and accreditation requirements for Forensic Science Testing Laboratories.
Refer to the certificate and scope of accreditation FT-0330 at:
http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-region-4s-science-and-ecosystem-support-division-sesd
NR Not accredited for this test.
DW Accredited for conformance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and testing elements in the Fifth Edition of the Manual for
the Certification of Laboratories Analyzing Drinking Water, EPA 815-R-05-004, 2005.
Refer to the certificate and scope of accreditation AT-2628 at:
http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-region-4s-science-and-ecosystem-support-division-sesd
ISO/DW Accredited to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and accreditation requirements for Forensic Science Testing Labs, and
conformance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and testing elements in the Manual for the Certification of Laboratories
Analyzing Drinking Water.
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 5 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2 E213804-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 13:13
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U1319-77-3 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
2.01,1-Biphenyl ug/L EPA 8270D8492-52-4 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
2.01,4-Dioxane ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U123-91-1 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
201-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D420J, QL-290-12-0 9/21/2112:349/16/21 8:15
102,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U58-90-2 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
102,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-95-4 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
102,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-06-2 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
102,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U120-83-2 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
102,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U105-67-9 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
202,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D20U51-28-5 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
102,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U121-14-2 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
102,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U606-20-2 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
102-Chloronaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-58-7 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
102-Chlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-57-8 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
102-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U534-52-1 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
202-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D76091-57-6 9/21/2112:349/16/21 8:15
102-Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-48-7 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
102-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-74-4 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
102-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-75-5 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
103,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-94-1 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
103-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U99-09-2 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
104-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U101-55-3 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
104-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U59-50-7 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
104-Chloroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U106-47-8 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
104-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U7005-72-3 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
104-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-01-6 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
104-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-02-7 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
20Acenaphtheneug/L EPA 8270D47083-32-9 9/21/2112:349/16/21 8:15
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 6 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2 E213804-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 13:13
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
2.0Acenaphthyleneug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U208-96-8 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10Acetophenoneug/L EPA 8270D10U98-86-2 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
2.0Anthraceneug/L EPA 8270D3.3120-12-7 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10Atrazineug/L EPA 8270D10U, J, QL-1,
QR-1
1912-24-9 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10Benzaldehydeug/L EPA 8270D10U100-52-7 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U56-55-3 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U50-32-8 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U205-99-2 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U191-24-2 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U207-08-9 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10Benzyl alcohol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-51-6 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U85-68-7 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U108-60-1 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-91-1 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-44-4 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-81-7 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10Caprolactamug/L EPA 8270D10U105-60-2 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
20Carbazoleug/L EPA 8270D17086-74-8 9/21/2112:349/16/21 8:15
2.0Chryseneug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U218-01-9 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
2.0Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U53-70-3 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
20Dibenzofuranug/L EPA 8270D240132-64-9 9/21/2112:349/16/21 8:15
10Diethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-66-2 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10Dimethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U131-11-3 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-74-2 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-84-0 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
2.0Fluorantheneug/L EPA 8270D8.5206-44-0 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
20Fluoreneug/L EPA 8270D16086-73-7 9/21/2112:349/16/21 8:15
10Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)ug/L EPA 8270D10U118-74-1 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 7 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2 E213804-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 13:13
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)ug/L EPA 8270D10U77-47-4 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10Hexachloroethaneug/L EPA 8270D10U67-72-1 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
2.0Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U193-39-5 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10Isophoroneug/L EPA 8270D10U78-59-1 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
200Naphthaleneug/L EPA 8270D500091-20-3 9/21/2114:549/16/21 8:15
10Nitrobenzeneug/L EPA 8270D10U98-95-3 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U621-64-7 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U122-39-4 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
10Pentachlorophenolug/L EPA 8270D10U87-86-5 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
20Phenanthreneug/L EPA 8270D18085-01-8 9/21/2112:349/16/21 8:15
10Phenolug/L EPA 8270D10U108-95-2 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
2.0Pyreneug/L EPA 8270D4.3129-00-0 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
10 EPA 8270Dug/L10Tentatively Identified Compounds UR4-0000 9/21/2117:429/16/21 8:15
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 8 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57 E213804-02
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 14:20
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U1319-77-3 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
201,1-Biphenyl ug/L EPA 8270D13092-52-4 9/21/2113:029/16/21 8:15
2.01,4-Dioxane ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U123-91-1 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
2001-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D420J, QL-290-12-0 9/21/2115:229/16/21 8:15
102,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U58-90-2 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
102,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-95-4 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
102,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-06-2 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
102,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U120-83-2 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
102,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U105-67-9 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
202,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D20U51-28-5 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
102,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U121-14-2 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
102,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U606-20-2 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
102-Chloronaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-58-7 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
102-Chlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-57-8 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
102-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U534-52-1 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
2002-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D83091-57-6 9/21/2115:229/16/21 8:15
102-Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-48-7 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
102-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-74-4 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
102-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-75-5 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
103,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-94-1 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
103-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U99-09-2 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
104-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U101-55-3 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
104-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U59-50-7 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
104-Chloroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U106-47-8 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
104-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U7005-72-3 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
104-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-01-6 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
104-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-02-7 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
20Acenaphtheneug/L EPA 8270D51083-32-9 9/21/2113:029/16/21 8:15
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 9 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57 E213804-02
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 14:20
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
2.0Acenaphthyleneug/L EPA 8270D3.4208-96-8 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10Acetophenoneug/L EPA 8270D10U98-86-2 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
2.0Anthraceneug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U120-12-7 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10Atrazineug/L EPA 8270D10U, J, QL-1,
QR-1
1912-24-9 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10Benzaldehydeug/L EPA 8270D10U100-52-7 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U56-55-3 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U50-32-8 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U205-99-2 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U191-24-2 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U207-08-9 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10Benzyl alcohol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-51-6 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U85-68-7 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U108-60-1 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-91-1 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-44-4 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-81-7 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10Caprolactamug/L EPA 8270D10U105-60-2 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
20Carbazoleug/L EPA 8270D24086-74-8 9/21/2113:029/16/21 8:15
2.0Chryseneug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U218-01-9 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
2.0Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U53-70-3 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
20Dibenzofuranug/L EPA 8270D320132-64-9 9/21/2113:029/16/21 8:15
10Diethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-66-2 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10Dimethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U131-11-3 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-74-2 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-84-0 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
2.0Fluorantheneug/L EPA 8270D1.8 J, Q-2206-44-0 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
20Fluoreneug/L EPA 8270D12086-73-7 9/21/2113:029/16/21 8:15
10Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)ug/L EPA 8270D10U118-74-1 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 10 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57 E213804-02
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 14:20
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)ug/L EPA 8270D10U77-47-4 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10Hexachloroethaneug/L EPA 8270D10U67-72-1 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
2.0Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U193-39-5 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10Isophoroneug/L EPA 8270D10U78-59-1 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
200Naphthaleneug/L EPA 8270D880091-20-3 9/21/2115:229/16/21 8:15
10Nitrobenzeneug/L EPA 8270D10U98-95-3 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U621-64-7 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U122-39-4 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
10Pentachlorophenolug/L EPA 8270D10U87-86-5 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
20Phenanthreneug/L EPA 8270D12085-01-8 9/21/2113:029/16/21 8:15
10Phenolug/L EPA 8270D10U108-95-2 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
2.0Pyreneug/L EPA 8270D0.76 J, Q-2129-00-0 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
10 EPA 8270Dug/L10Tentatively Identified Compounds UR4-0000 9/21/2118:389/16/21 8:15
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 11 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58 E213804-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 15:38
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U1319-77-3 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
2.01,1-Biphenyl ug/L EPA 8270D8092-52-4 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
2.01,4-Dioxane ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U123-91-1 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
2001-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D260J, QL-290-12-0 9/21/2115:509/16/21 8:15
102,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U58-90-2 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
102,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-95-4 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
102,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-06-2 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
102,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U120-83-2 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
102,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U105-67-9 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
202,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D20U51-28-5 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
102,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U121-14-2 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
102,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U606-20-2 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
102-Chloronaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-58-7 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
102-Chlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-57-8 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
102-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U534-52-1 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
2002-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D48091-57-6 9/21/2115:509/16/21 8:15
102-Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-48-7 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
102-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-74-4 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
102-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-75-5 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
103,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-94-1 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
103-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U99-09-2 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
104-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U101-55-3 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
104-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U59-50-7 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
104-Chloroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U106-47-8 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
104-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U7005-72-3 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
104-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-01-6 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
104-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-02-7 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
20Acenaphtheneug/L EPA 8270D41083-32-9 9/21/2113:309/16/21 8:15
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 12 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58 E213804-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 15:38
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
2.0Acenaphthyleneug/L EPA 8270D4.0208-96-8 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Acetophenoneug/L EPA 8270D10U98-86-2 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
2.0Anthraceneug/L EPA 8270D1.4 J, Q-2120-12-7 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Atrazineug/L EPA 8270D10U, J, QL-1,
QR-1
1912-24-9 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Benzaldehydeug/L EPA 8270D10U100-52-7 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U56-55-3 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U50-32-8 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U205-99-2 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U191-24-2 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U207-08-9 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Benzyl alcohol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-51-6 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U85-68-7 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U108-60-1 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-91-1 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-44-4 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-81-7 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Caprolactamug/L EPA 8270D10U105-60-2 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
20Carbazoleug/L EPA 8270D13086-74-8 9/21/2113:309/16/21 8:15
2.0Chryseneug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U218-01-9 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
2.0Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U53-70-3 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
20Dibenzofuranug/L EPA 8270D230132-64-9 9/21/2113:309/16/21 8:15
10Diethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-66-2 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Dimethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U131-11-3 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-74-2 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-84-0 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
2.0Fluorantheneug/L EPA 8270D2.6206-44-0 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
2.0Fluoreneug/L EPA 8270D9886-73-7 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)ug/L EPA 8270D10U118-74-1 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 13 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58 E213804-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 15:38
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)ug/L EPA 8270D10U77-47-4 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Hexachloroethaneug/L EPA 8270D10U67-72-1 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
2.0Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U193-39-5 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Isophoroneug/L EPA 8270D10U78-59-1 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
200Naphthaleneug/L EPA 8270D520091-20-3 9/21/2115:509/16/21 8:15
10Nitrobenzeneug/L EPA 8270D10U98-95-3 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U621-64-7 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U122-39-4 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Pentachlorophenolug/L EPA 8270D10U87-86-5 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
2.0Phenanthreneug/L EPA 8270D7785-01-8 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
10Phenolug/L EPA 8270D10U108-95-2 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
2.0Pyreneug/L EPA 8270D1.4 J, Q-2129-00-0 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
EPA 8270Dug/L100Acenaphthylenone (TIC)NJR4-8001314 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
EPA 8270Dug/L10Fluorenone (TIC)NJR4-6621 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
EPA 8270Dug/L10Methyldibenzothiophene (TIC)NJR4-8000159 9/21/2119:069/16/21 8:15
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 14 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6 E213804-04
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 17:09
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U1319-77-3 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
201,1-Biphenyl ug/L EPA 8270D15092-52-4 9/21/2113:589/16/21 8:15
2.01,4-Dioxane ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U123-91-1 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
2001-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D540J, QL-290-12-0 9/21/2116:189/16/21 8:15
102,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U58-90-2 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
102,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-95-4 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
102,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-06-2 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
102,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U120-83-2 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
102,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U105-67-9 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
202,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D20U51-28-5 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
102,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U121-14-2 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
102,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U606-20-2 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
102-Chloronaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-58-7 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
102-Chlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-57-8 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
102-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U534-52-1 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
2002-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D110091-57-6 9/21/2116:189/16/21 8:15
102-Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-48-7 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
102-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-74-4 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
102-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-75-5 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
103,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-94-1 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
103-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U99-09-2 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
104-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U101-55-3 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
104-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U59-50-7 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
104-Chloroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U106-47-8 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
104-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U7005-72-3 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
104-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-01-6 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
104-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-02-7 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
20Acenaphtheneug/L EPA 8270D71083-32-9 9/21/2113:589/16/21 8:15
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 15 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6 E213804-04
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 17:09
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
2.0Acenaphthyleneug/L EPA 8270D4.1208-96-8 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10Acetophenoneug/L EPA 8270D10U98-86-2 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
2.0Anthraceneug/L EPA 8270D5.0120-12-7 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10Atrazineug/L EPA 8270D10U, J, QL-1,
QR-1
1912-24-9 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10Benzaldehydeug/L EPA 8270D10U100-52-7 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U56-55-3 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U50-32-8 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U205-99-2 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U191-24-2 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
2.0Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U207-08-9 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10Benzyl alcohol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-51-6 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U85-68-7 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U108-60-1 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-91-1 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-44-4 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-81-7 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10Caprolactamug/L EPA 8270D10U105-60-2 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
20Carbazoleug/L EPA 8270D43086-74-8 9/21/2113:589/16/21 8:15
2.0Chryseneug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U218-01-9 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
2.0Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U53-70-3 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
20Dibenzofuranug/L EPA 8270D370132-64-9 9/21/2113:589/16/21 8:15
10Diethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-66-2 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10Dimethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U131-11-3 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-74-2 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-84-0 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
2.0Fluorantheneug/L EPA 8270D8.7206-44-0 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
20Fluoreneug/L EPA 8270D24086-73-7 9/21/2113:589/16/21 8:15
10Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)ug/L EPA 8270D10U118-74-1 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 16 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6 E213804-04
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:9/14/21 17:09
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)ug/L EPA 8270D10U77-47-4 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10Hexachloroethaneug/L EPA 8270D10U67-72-1 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
2.0Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U193-39-5 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10Isophoroneug/L EPA 8270D10U78-59-1 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
2000Naphthaleneug/L EPA 8270D1300091-20-3 9/21/2116:469/16/21 8:15
10Nitrobenzeneug/L EPA 8270D10U98-95-3 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U621-64-7 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U122-39-4 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
10Pentachlorophenolug/L EPA 8270D10U87-86-5 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
20Phenanthreneug/L EPA 8270D19085-01-8 9/21/2113:589/16/21 8:15
10Phenolug/L EPA 8270D10U108-95-2 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
2.0Pyreneug/L EPA 8270D5.7129-00-0 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
EPA 8270Dug/L20Phenanthridinone (TIC)NJR4-8000020 9/21/2119:339/16/21 8:15
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 17 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2109036 - E 3520 LLE
Blank (2109036-BLK1)Prepared: 09/16/21 Analyzed: 09/21/21
EPA 8270D
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/LU10 U
1,1-Biphenyl "U 2.0 U
1,4-Dioxane "U 2.0 U
1-Methylnaphthalene "U 2.0 U
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol "U 10 U
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol "U 10 U
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol "U 10 U
2,4-Dichlorophenol "U 10 U
2,4-Dimethylphenol "U 10 U
2,4-Dinitrophenol "U 20 U
2,4-Dinitrotoluene "U 10 U
2,6-Dinitrotoluene "U 10 U
2-Chloronaphthalene "U 10 U
2-Chlorophenol "U 10 U
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol "U 10 U
2-Methylnaphthalene "U 2.0 U
2-Methylphenol "U 10 U
2-Nitroaniline "U 10 U
2-Nitrophenol "U 10 U
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine "U 10 U
3-Nitroaniline "U 10 U
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether "U 10 U
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol "U 10 U
4-Chloroaniline "U 10 U
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether "U 10 U
4-Nitroaniline "U 10 U
4-Nitrophenol "U 10 U
Acenaphthene "U 2.0 U
Acenaphthylene "U 2.0 U
Acetophenone "U 10 U
Anthracene "U 2.0 U
Atrazine "U 10 U
Benzaldehyde "U 10 U
Benzo(a)anthracene "U 2.0 U
Benzo(a)pyrene "U 2.0 U
Benzo(b)fluoranthene "U 2.0 U
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene "U 2.0 U
Benzo(k)fluoranthene "U 2.0 U
Benzyl alcohol "U 10 U
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 18 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2109036 - E 3520 LLE
Blank (2109036-BLK1)Prepared: 09/16/21 Analyzed: 09/21/21
Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/LU10 U
Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether "U 10 U
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane "U 10 U
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether "U 10 U
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate "U 10 U
Caprolactam "U 10 U
Carbazole "U 2.0 U
Chrysene "U 2.0 U
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene "U 2.0 U
Dibenzofuran "U 2.0 U
Diethyl phthalate "U 10 U
Dimethyl phthalate "U 10 U
Di-n-butylphthalate "U 10 U
Di-n-octylphthalate "U 10 U
Fluoranthene "U 2.0 U
Fluorene "U 2.0 U
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)"U 10 U
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)"U 10 U
Hexachloroethane "U 10 U
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene "U 2.0 U
Isophorone "U 10 U
Naphthalene "U 2.0 U
Nitrobenzene "U 10 U
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine "U 10 U
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine "U 10 U
Pentachlorophenol "U 10 U
Phenanthrene "U 2.0 U
Phenol "U 10 U
Pyrene "U 2.0 U
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 19 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2109036 - E 3520 LLE
LCS (2109036-BS1)Prepared: 09/16/21 Analyzed: 09/21/21
EPA 8270D
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L64.700 10 60.000 55-111108
1,1-Biphenyl "57.080 2.0 60.000 51-11895.1
1,4-Dioxane "37.930 2.0 60.000 41-8963.2
1-Methylnaphthalene "77.860 2.0 60.000 QL-261-127130
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol "52.010 10 60.000 45-13486.7
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol "59.830 10 60.000 56-13199.7
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol "59.680 10 60.000 56-12899.5
2,4-Dichlorophenol "60.780 10 60.000 63-123101
2,4-Dimethylphenol "60.240 10 60.000 44-106100
2,4-Dinitrophenol "119.45 20 120.00 49-12899.5
2,4-Dinitrotoluene "62.540 10 60.000 58-125104
2,6-Dinitrotoluene "62.540 10 60.000 60-122104
2-Chloronaphthalene "61.150 10 60.000 53-115102
2-Chlorophenol "55.070 10 60.000 55-11791.8
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol "58.690 10 60.000 62-12597.8
2-Methylnaphthalene "56.280 2.0 60.000 56-11593.8
2-Methylphenol "56.790 10 60.000 52-11194.6
2-Nitroaniline "62.150 10 60.000 58-121104
2-Nitrophenol "57.590 10 60.000 58-12696.0
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine "43.920 10 60.000 10-14473.2
3-Nitroaniline "57.790 10 60.000 38-14196.3
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether "58.430 10 60.000 61-11797.4
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol "62.720 10 60.000 64-122105
4-Chloroaniline "27.050 10 60.000 18-10245.1
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether "63.390 10 60.000 55-117106
4-Nitroaniline "57.350 10 60.000 15-18595.6
4-Nitrophenol "57.270 10 60.000 38-13095.4
Acenaphthene "59.230 2.0 60.000 53-11598.7
Acenaphthylene "59.510 2.0 60.000 53-11899.2
Acetophenone "61.250 10 60.000 60-112102
Anthracene "57.670 2.0 60.000 65-11096.1
Atrazine "16.490 10 60.000 QL-153-12827.5
Benzaldehyde "50.360 10 60.000 55-15283.9
Benzo(a)anthracene "55.750 2.0 60.000 52-12192.9
Benzo(a)pyrene "48.910 2.0 60.000 60-11581.5
Benzo(b)fluoranthene "54.770 2.0 60.000 58-11791.3
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene "49.980 2.0 60.000 45-10183.3
Benzo(k)fluoranthene "61.770 2.0 60.000 64-124103
Benzyl alcohol "57.780 10 60.000 49-11496.3
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 20 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2109036 - E 3520 LLE
LCS (2109036-BS1)Prepared: 09/16/21 Analyzed: 09/21/21
Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L60.030 10 60.000 58-129100
Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether "55.860 10 60.000 55-11393.1
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane "59.820 10 60.000 59-11599.7
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether "56.650 10 60.000 53-11794.4
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate "63.520 10 60.000 56-130106
Caprolactam "44.260 10 60.000 33-9473.8
Carbazole "55.070 2.0 60.000 68-11491.8
Chrysene "58.830 2.0 60.000 58-12298.0
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene "54.710 2.0 60.000 46-11391.2
Dibenzofuran "58.900 2.0 60.000 50-13398.2
Diethyl phthalate "63.560 10 60.000 61-118106
Dimethyl phthalate "62.610 10 60.000 58-120104
Di-n-butylphthalate "62.610 10 60.000 63-117104
Di-n-octylphthalate "59.190 10 60.000 60-12598.6
Fluoranthene "60.670 2.0 60.000 68-113101
Fluorene "63.890 2.0 60.000 60-117106
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)"60.160 10 60.000 56-120100
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)"53.850 10 60.000 18-10389.8
Hexachloroethane "52.350 10 60.000 35-10587.2
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene "52.730 2.0 60.000 47-11087.9
Isophorone "60.540 10 60.000 60-114101
Naphthalene "57.390 2.0 60.000 55-11395.6
Nitrobenzene "59.400 10 60.000 59-11499.0
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine "59.730 10 60.000 58-11399.6
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine "60.300 10 60.000 65-115100
Pentachlorophenol "56.430 10 60.000 47-12294.0
Phenanthrene "59.920 2.0 60.000 63-11199.9
Phenol "56.780 10 60.000 47-10494.6
Pyrene "52.320 2.0 60.000 48-12987.2
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 21 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2109036 - E 3520 LLE
LCS Dup (2109036-BSD1)Prepared: 09/16/21 Analyzed: 09/21/21
EPA 8270D
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L62.050 10 60.000 3055-111103 4.18
1,1-Biphenyl "57.430 2.0 60.000 1851-11895.7 0.611
1,4-Dioxane "35.420 2.0 60.000 5041-8959.0 6.84
1-Methylnaphthalene "78.110 2.0 60.000 21 QL-261-127130 0.321
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol "52.570 10 60.000 1245-13487.6 1.07
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol "59.770 10 60.000 1456-13199.6 0.100
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol "59.890 10 60.000 1656-12899.8 0.351
2,4-Dichlorophenol "60.230 10 60.000 2563-123100 0.909
2,4-Dimethylphenol "57.520 10 60.000 2744-10695.9 4.62
2,4-Dinitrophenol "123.50 20 120.00 1749-128103 3.33
2,4-Dinitrotoluene "62.610 10 60.000 1058-125104 0.112
2,6-Dinitrotoluene "62.610 10 60.000 1260-122104 0.112
2-Chloronaphthalene "61.700 10 60.000 1953-115103 0.895
2-Chlorophenol "54.040 10 60.000 3555-11790.1 1.89
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol "59.050 10 60.000 1262-12598.4 0.612
2-Methylnaphthalene "55.950 2.0 60.000 2256-11593.2 0.588
2-Methylphenol "55.090 10 60.000 3352-11191.8 3.04
2-Nitroaniline "61.830 10 60.000 1358-121103 0.516
2-Nitrophenol "58.350 10 60.000 2858-12697.2 1.31
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine "48.600 10 60.000 5310-14481.0 10.1
3-Nitroaniline "57.370 10 60.000 1938-14195.6 0.729
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether "59.210 10 60.000 1261-11798.7 1.33
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol "61.240 10 60.000 1764-122102 2.39
4-Chloroaniline "25.540 10 60.000 4918-10242.6 5.74
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether "64.250 10 60.000 1755-117107 1.35
4-Nitroaniline "60.410 10 60.000 1915-185101 5.20
4-Nitrophenol "57.870 10 60.000 2338-13096.4 1.04
Acenaphthene "59.850 2.0 60.000 1453-11599.8 1.04
Acenaphthylene "60.530 2.0 60.000 1453-118101 1.70
Acetophenone "59.560 10 60.000 2760-11299.3 2.80
Anthracene "58.290 2.0 60.000 1065-11097.2 1.07
Atrazine "16.340 10 60.000 22 QL-153-12827.2 0.914
Benzaldehyde "49.690 10 60.000 2855-15282.8 1.34
Benzo(a)anthracene "55.910 2.0 60.000 1052-12193.2 0.287
Benzo(a)pyrene "48.620 2.0 60.000 1060-11581.0 0.595
Benzo(b)fluoranthene "52.610 2.0 60.000 2258-11787.7 4.02
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene "52.310 2.0 60.000 2045-10187.2 4.56
Benzo(k)fluoranthene "60.500 2.0 60.000 1964-124101 2.08
Benzyl alcohol "55.630 10 60.000 3449-11492.7 3.79
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 22 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2109036 - E 3520 LLE
LCS Dup (2109036-BSD1)Prepared: 09/16/21 Analyzed: 09/21/21
Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L56.930 10 60.000 1058-12994.9 5.30
Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether "55.360 10 60.000 2055-11392.3 0.899
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane "58.510 10 60.000 2559-11597.5 2.21
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether "56.530 10 60.000 2453-11794.2 0.212
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate "60.560 10 60.000 3956-130101 4.77
Caprolactam "40.830 10 60.000 3633-9468.0 8.06
Carbazole "56.120 2.0 60.000 1468-11493.5 1.89
Chrysene "58.860 2.0 60.000 1058-12298.1 0.0510
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene "58.270 2.0 60.000 2046-11397.1 6.30
Dibenzofuran "60.030 2.0 60.000 1350-133100 1.90
Diethyl phthalate "63.070 10 60.000 1061-118105 0.774
Dimethyl phthalate "62.360 10 60.000 1158-120104 0.400
Di-n-butylphthalate "63.270 10 60.000 1163-117105 1.05
Di-n-octylphthalate "57.650 10 60.000 1260-12596.1 2.64
Fluoranthene "60.850 2.0 60.000 1068-113101 0.296
Fluorene "64.620 2.0 60.000 1260-117108 1.14
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)"61.150 10 60.000 1256-120102 1.63
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)"57.810 10 60.000 3218-10396.4 7.09
Hexachloroethane "49.290 10 60.000 4535-10582.2 6.02
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene "54.550 2.0 60.000 2047-11090.9 3.39
Isophorone "59.860 10 60.000 2060-11499.8 1.13
Naphthalene "57.080 2.0 60.000 2755-11395.1 0.542
Nitrobenzene "58.810 10 60.000 2959-11498.0 0.998
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine "59.710 10 60.000 2458-11399.5 0.0335
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine "61.230 10 60.000 1065-115102 1.53
Pentachlorophenol "56.460 10 60.000 1147-12294.1 0.0531
Phenanthrene "60.980 2.0 60.000 1063-111102 1.75
Phenol "54.010 10 60.000 3847-10490.0 5.00
Pyrene "50.940 2.0 60.000 1048-12984.9 2.67
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 23 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2109036 - E 3520 LLE
Duplicate (2109036-DUP1)Prepared: 09/16/21 Analyzed: 09/21/21 Source: E213804-01
EPA 8270D
1-Methylnaphthalene ug/L422.60 20 422.51 200 QL-2, J0.0207
2-Methylnaphthalene "756.30 20 761.91 2000.739
Acenaphthene "495.40 20 471.76 2004.89
Carbazole "186.10 20 169.25 2009.49
Dibenzofuran "253.30 20 243.42 2003.98
Fluorene "167.10 20 159.70 2004.53
Phenanthrene "195.30 20 181.21 2007.49
Duplicate (2109036-DUP2)Prepared: 09/16/21 Analyzed: 09/21/21 Source: E213804-01RE1
EPA 8270D
Naphthalene ug/L5129.0 200 4993.0 2002.69
Duplicate (2109036-DUP3)Prepared: 09/16/21 Analyzed: 09/21/21 Source: E213804-01RE2
EPA 8270D
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/LU10 U 200 U
1,1-Biphenyl "87.220 2.0 84.141 2003.59
1,4-Dioxane "U 2.0 U 200 U
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2,4-Dichlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2,4-Dimethylphenol "U 10 U 200 U
2,4-Dinitrophenol "U 20 U 200 U
2,4-Dinitrotoluene "U 10 U 200 U
2,6-Dinitrotoluene "U 10 U 200 U
2-Chloronaphthalene "U 10 U 200 U
2-Chlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2-Methylphenol "U 10 U 200 U
2-Nitroaniline "U 10 U 200 U
2-Nitrophenol "U 10 U 200 U
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine "U 10 U 200 U
3-Nitroaniline "U 10 U 200 U
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether "U 10 U 200 U
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol "U 10 U 200 U
4-Chloroaniline "U 10 U 200 U
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether "U 10 U 200 U
4-Nitroaniline "U 10 U 200 U
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 24 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2109036 - E 3520 LLE
Duplicate (2109036-DUP3)Prepared: 09/16/21 Analyzed: 09/21/21 Source: E213804-01RE2
4-Nitrophenol ug/LU10 U 200 U
Acenaphthylene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Acetophenone "U 10 U 200 U
Anthracene "3.5800 2.0 3.3065 2007.94
Atrazine "U 10 U 200 QL-1, J,
QR-1, U
Benzaldehyde "U 10 U 200 U
Benzo(a)anthracene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Benzo(a)pyrene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Benzo(b)fluoranthene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Benzo(k)fluoranthene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Benzyl alcohol "U 10 U 200 U
Benzyl butyl phthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether "U 10 U 200 U
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane "U 10 U 200 U
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether "U 10 U 200 U
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Caprolactam "U 10 U 200 U
Chrysene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Diethyl phthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Dimethyl phthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Di-n-butylphthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Di-n-octylphthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Fluoranthene "9.0100 2.0 8.5226 2005.56
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)"U 10 U 200 U
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)"U 10 U 200 U
Hexachloroethane "U 10 U 200 U
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Isophorone "U 10 U 200 U
Nitrobenzene "U 10 U 200 U
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine "U 10 U 200 U
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine "U 10 U 200 U
Pentachlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
Phenol "U 10 U 200 U
Pyrene "4.6600 2.0 4.3116 2007.77
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 25 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2109036 - E 3520 LLE
MRL Verification (2109036-PS1)Prepared: 09/16/21 Analyzed: 09/21/21
EPA 8270D
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L7.4900 10 10.000 MRL-2, J48-10574.9
1,1-Biphenyl "1.4000 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J50-10470.0
1,4-Dioxane "0.95000 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J14-11047.5
1-Methylnaphthalene "1.8800 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J56-11794.0
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol "7.4900 10 10.000 MRL-2, J31-11174.9
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol "7.6600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J42-11576.6
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol "7.3300 10 10.000 MRL-2, J47-11073.3
2,4-Dichlorophenol "7.6400 10 10.000 MRL-2, J49-11676.4
2,4-Dimethylphenol "10.730 10 10.000 MRL-216-111107
2,4-Dinitrophenol "18.050 20 20.000 MRL-2, J10-12490.2
2,4-Dinitrotoluene "8.1500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J53-10881.5
2,6-Dinitrotoluene "8.1500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J55-10681.5
2-Chloronaphthalene "7.4900 10 10.000 MRL-2, J51-10474.9
2-Chlorophenol "7.6600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J46-11176.6
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol "8.7600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J26-11687.6
2-Methylnaphthalene "1.3700 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J51-10668.5
2-Methylphenol "7.7800 10 10.000 MRL-2, J42-10877.8
2-Nitroaniline "8.2300 10 10.000 MRL-2, J48-10982.3
2-Nitrophenol "7.8300 10 10.000 MRL-2, J46-12078.3
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine "5.3300 10 10.000 MRL-2, J10-10353.3
3-Nitroaniline "7.2300 10 10.000 MRL-2, J28-11872.3
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether "7.5400 10 10.000 MRL-2, J58-10675.4
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol "7.9300 10 10.000 MRL-2, J49-11879.3
4-Chloroaniline "3.2500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J20-8532.5
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether "7.0900 10 10.000 MRL-2, J49-10270.9
4-Nitroaniline "8.7200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J10-16587.2
4-Nitrophenol "7.2500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J11-11672.5
Acenaphthene "1.4000 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J51-10070.0
Acenaphthylene "1.5000 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J52-10475.0
Acetophenone "7.5200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J56-10875.2
Anthracene "1.5800 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J48-10879.0
Atrazine "2.4200 10 10.000 MRL-2,
QR-1, J
46-12624.2
Benzaldehyde "7.7800 10 10.000 MRL-2, J40-16977.8
Benzo(a)anthracene "1.5100 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J52-11775.5
Benzo(a)pyrene "1.2300 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J48-11661.5
Benzo(b)fluoranthene "1.6000 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J31-14280.0
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene "1.5000 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J37-11575.0
Benzo(k)fluoranthene "1.5000 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J29-14575.0
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 26 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2109036 - E 3520 LLE
MRL Verification (2109036-PS1)Prepared: 09/16/21 Analyzed: 09/21/21
Benzyl alcohol ug/L7.6700 10 10.000 MRL-2, J12-13376.7
Benzyl butyl phthalate "9.0200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J60-13690.2
Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether "8.0100 10 10.000 MRL-2, J48-10780.1
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane "7.9300 10 10.000 MRL-2, J53-10779.3
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether "7.8700 10 10.000 MRL-2, J47-10478.7
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate "8.7200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J19-17987.2
Caprolactam "6.5400 10 10.000 MRL-2, J32-8765.4
Carbazole "1.5800 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J67-11979.0
Chrysene "1.5300 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J55-11676.5
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene "1.4900 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J33-11874.5
Dibenzofuran "1.5200 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J53-11376.0
Diethyl phthalate "8.3600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J53-12983.6
Dimethyl phthalate "8.2400 10 10.000 MRL-2, J59-10782.4
Di-n-butylphthalate "9.8200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J69-13998.2
Di-n-octylphthalate "9.3000 10 10.000 MRL-2, J62-12993.0
Fluoranthene "1.5300 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J60-11276.5
Fluorene "1.4600 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J55-10173.0
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)"7.4900 10 10.000 MRL-2, J50-10574.9
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)"11.310 10 10.000 MRL-2,
QR-2
10-85113
Hexachloroethane "6.8600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J26-8968.6
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene "1.3800 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J37-11469.0
Isophorone "8.3000 10 10.000 MRL-2, J54-10883.0
Naphthalene "1.7500 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J38-13787.5
Nitrobenzene "8.1100 10 10.000 MRL-2, J54-11081.1
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine "8.2300 10 10.000 MRL-2, J49-10682.3
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine "7.6200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J55-10776.2
Pentachlorophenol "8.3900 10 10.000 MRL-2, J20-13683.9
Phenanthrene "1.5200 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J55-11576.0
Phenol "7.9000 10 10.000 MRL-2, J44-9779.0
Pyrene "1.5500 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J51-12277.5
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 27 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 21-0367
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 21-0367, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Notes and Definitions for QC Samples
U The analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit.
J The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
MRL-2 MRL verification for Non-Potable Water matrix
QL-1 Laboratory Control Spike Recovery less than method control limits
QL-2 Laboratory Control Spike Recovery greater than method control limits
QR-1 MRL verification recovery less than lower control limits.
QR-2 MRL verification recovery greater than upper control limits.
9/28/21 16:39E213804 SVOA FINAL 09 28 21 1639Page 28 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
November 9, 2021
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
FROM:
FINAL Analytical Report
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote
Stacie Masters
LSB Organic Chemistry Section Chief
Laboratory Services Branch
John Deatrick, ChiefTHRU:
TO:Joydeb Majumder
Attached are the final results for the analytical groups listed below. This report shall not be reproduced except in
full without approval of the Region 4 laboratory. These analyses were performed in accordance with the
Laboratory Services Branch's Laboratory Operations and Quality Assurance Manual (LSB LOQAM) found at
www.epa.gov/region4/sesd/asbsop. Any unique project data quality objectives specified in writing by the data
requestor have also been incorporated into the data unless otherwise noted in the Report Narrative. Chemistry
data have been verified based on the LSB LOQAM specifications and have been qualified by this laboratory if
the applicable quality control criteria were not met. Verification is defined in Chapter 5 of the LSB LOQAM. For
a listing of specific data qualifiers and explanations, please refer to the Data Qualifier Definitions included in
this report. The reported results are accurate within the limits of the method(s) and are representative only of the
samples as received by the laboratory.
Analyses Included in this report:Method Used:Accreditations:
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA)
Semivolatile organic compounds ISOEPA 8270D (Water)
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 1 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Sample Disposal Policy
Due to limited space for long term sample storage, LSB’s policy is to dispose of samples on a periodic schedule.
Air samples collected in summa canisters will be disposed of 30 days following the issuance of this report. All
other sample media including original samples, sample extracts and or digestates will be disposed of, in
accordance with applicable regulations, 60 days from the date of this report.
This sample disposal policy does not apply to criminal samples which are held until the laboratory is notified by
the criminal investigators that case development and litigation are complete.
These samples may be held in the laboratory's custody for a longer period of time. If samples require storage
beyond the 60-day period, please contact the Sample Control Coordinator by e-mail at
[e-mail].
cc: Nardina Turner
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 2 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Date ReceivedDate CollectedMatrixLaboratory IDSample ID
SAMPLES INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote
MW-2 E214202-01 Groundwater 10/13/21 15:25 10/14/21 12:30
MW-57 E214202-02 Groundwater 10/13/21 17:10 10/14/21 12:30
MW-58 E214202-03 Groundwater 10/13/21 17:28 10/14/21 12:30
MW-6 E214202-04 Groundwater 10/13/21 15:18 10/14/21 12:30
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 3 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
DATA QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS
U The analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit.
J The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
NJ Presumptive evidence that analyte is present; reported as a tentative identification with an estimated value.
Q-2 Result greater than MDL but less than MRL.
QC-1 Analyte concentration low in continuing calibration verification standard
QC-2 Analyte concentration high in continuing calibration verification standard
QL-1 Laboratory Control Spike Recovery less than method control limits
QL-2 Laboratory Control Spike Recovery greater than method control limits
QR-1 MRL verification recovery less than lower control limits.
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 4 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
CAS Chemical Abstracts Service
Note: Analytes with no known CAS identifiers have been assigned codes beginning with "E", the EPA ID as assigned by
the EPA Substance Registry System (www.epa.gov/srs), or beginning with "R4-", a unique identifier assigned by the EPA
Region 4 laboratory.
MDL Method Detection Limit - The minimum concentration of a substance (an analyte) that can be measured and
reported with a 99% confidence that the analyte concentration is greater than zero.
MRL Minimum Reporting Limit - Analyte concentration that corresponds to the lowest demonstrated level of acceptable
quantitation. The MRL is sample-specific and accounts for preparation weights and volumes, dilutions, and
moisture content of soil/sediments.
TIC Tentatively Identified Compound - An analyte identified based on a match with the instrument software's mass
spectral library. A calibration standard has not been analyzed to confirm the compound's identification or the
estimated concentration reported.
ACCREDITATIONS:
ISO Accredited to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and accreditation requirements for Forensic Science Testing Laboratories.
Refer to the certificate and scope of accreditation FT-0330 at:
http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-region-4s-science-and-ecosystem-support-division-sesd
NR Not accredited for this test.
DW Accredited for conformance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and testing elements in the Fifth Edition of the Manual for
the Certification of Laboratories Analyzing Drinking Water, EPA 815-R-05-004, 2005.
Refer to the certificate and scope of accreditation AT-2628 at:
http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-region-4s-science-and-ecosystem-support-division-sesd
ISO/DW Accredited to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and accreditation requirements for Forensic Science Testing Labs, and
conformance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and testing elements in the Manual for the Certification of Laboratories
Analyzing Drinking Water.
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 5 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2 E214202-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 15:25
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U1319-77-3 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
2.11,1-Biphenyl ug/L EPA 8270D96J, QC-292-52-4 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
2.11,4-Dioxane ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U123-91-1 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
411-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D540J, QL-290-12-0 10/22/2115:5310/18/21 8:19
102,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U58-90-2 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
102,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-95-4 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
102,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-06-2 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
102,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U120-83-2 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
102,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U105-67-9 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
212,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D21U51-28-5 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
102,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U121-14-2 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
102,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U606-20-2 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
102-Chloronaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-58-7 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
102-Chlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-57-8 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
102-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U534-52-1 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
412-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D100091-57-6 10/22/2115:5310/18/21 8:19
102-Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-48-7 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
102-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-74-4 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
102-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-75-5 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
103,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-94-1 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
103-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U99-09-2 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
104-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U101-55-3 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
104-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U59-50-7 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
104-Chloroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U106-47-8 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
104-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U7005-72-3 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
104-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-01-6 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
104-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-02-7 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
41Acenaphtheneug/L EPA 8270D59083-32-9 10/22/2115:5310/18/21 8:19
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 6 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2 E214202-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 15:25
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
2.1Acenaphthyleneug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U208-96-8 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10Acetophenoneug/L EPA 8270D10U98-86-2 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
2.1Anthraceneug/L EPA 8270D3.9120-12-7 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10Atrazineug/L EPA 8270D10U, J, QL-1,
QR-1, QC-1
1912-24-9 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10Benzaldehydeug/L EPA 8270D10U100-52-7 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
2.1Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U56-55-3 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
2.1Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U50-32-8 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
2.1Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U205-99-2 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
2.1Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U191-24-2 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
2.1Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U207-08-9 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10Benzyl alcohol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-51-6 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U85-68-7 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U108-60-1 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-91-1 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-44-4 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-81-7 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10Caprolactamug/L EPA 8270D10U105-60-2 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
41Carbazoleug/L EPA 8270D15086-74-8 10/22/2115:5310/18/21 8:19
2.1Chryseneug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U218-01-9 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
2.1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U53-70-3 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
41Dibenzofuranug/L EPA 8270D280132-64-9 10/22/2115:5310/18/21 8:19
10Diethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-66-2 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10Dimethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U131-11-3 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-74-2 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-84-0 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
2.1Fluorantheneug/L EPA 8270D12206-44-0 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
41Fluoreneug/L EPA 8270D190J, QL-286-73-7 10/22/2115:5310/18/21 8:19
10Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)ug/L EPA 8270D10U118-74-1 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 7 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2 E214202-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 15:25
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)ug/L EPA 8270D10U77-47-4 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10Hexachloroethaneug/L EPA 8270D10U67-72-1 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
2.1Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U193-39-5 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10Isophoroneug/L EPA 8270D10U78-59-1 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
210Naphthaleneug/L EPA 8270D280091-20-3 10/26/2115:2710/18/21 8:19
10Nitrobenzeneug/L EPA 8270D10U98-95-3 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U621-64-7 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U122-39-4 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
10Pentachlorophenolug/L EPA 8270D10U87-86-5 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
41Phenanthreneug/L EPA 8270D22085-01-8 10/22/2115:5310/18/21 8:19
10Phenolug/L EPA 8270D10U108-95-2 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
2.1Pyreneug/L EPA 8270D5.4129-00-0 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
10 EPA 8270Dug/L10Tentatively Identified Compounds UR4-0000 10/22/2113:3310/18/21 8:19
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 8 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57 E214202-02
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 17:10
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
9.9(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U1319-77-3 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
991,1-Biphenyl ug/L EPA 8270D140J, QC-292-52-4 10/25/2115:2510/18/21 8:19
2.01,4-Dioxane ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U123-91-1 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
991-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D220J, QL-290-12-0 10/25/2115:2510/18/21 8:19
9.92,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U58-90-2 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.92,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U95-95-4 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.92,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U88-06-2 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
5002,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D500U120-83-2 10/25/2115:2510/18/21 8:19
5002,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D500U105-67-9 10/25/2115:2510/18/21 8:19
202,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D20U51-28-5 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.92,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U121-14-2 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.92,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U606-20-2 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.92-Chloronaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U91-58-7 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.92-Chlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U95-57-8 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.92-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U534-52-1 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
992-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D45091-57-6 10/25/2115:2510/18/21 8:19
9.92-Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U95-48-7 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.92-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U88-74-4 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
5002-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D500U88-75-5 10/25/2115:2510/18/21 8:19
9.93,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U91-94-1 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.93-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U99-09-2 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.94-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U101-55-3 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
5004-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D500U59-50-7 10/25/2115:2510/18/21 8:19
5004-Chloroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D500U, J, QC-1106-47-8 10/25/2115:2510/18/21 8:19
9.94-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U7005-72-3 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.94-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U100-01-6 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.94-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U100-02-7 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
2.0Acenaphtheneug/L EPA 8270D5083-32-9 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 9 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57 E214202-02
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 17:10
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
2.0Acenaphthyleneug/L EPA 8270D3.2208-96-8 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.9Acetophenoneug/L EPA 8270D7.4 J, Q-298-86-2 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
2.0Anthraceneug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U120-12-7 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.9Atrazineug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U, J, QL-1,
QR-1, QC-1
1912-24-9 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.9Benzaldehydeug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U100-52-7 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
2.0Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U56-55-3 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
2.0Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U50-32-8 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
2.0Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U205-99-2 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
2.0Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U191-24-2 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
2.0Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U207-08-9 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.9Benzyl alcohol ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U100-51-6 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.9Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U85-68-7 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.9Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U108-60-1 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
500Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L EPA 8270D500U111-91-1 10/25/2115:2510/18/21 8:19
9.9bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U111-44-4 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.9Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U117-81-7 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
500Caprolactamug/L EPA 8270D500U105-60-2 10/25/2115:2510/18/21 8:19
2.0Carbazoleug/L EPA 8270D8.386-74-8 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
2.0Chryseneug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U218-01-9 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
2.0Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U53-70-3 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
99Dibenzofuranug/L EPA 8270D260132-64-9 10/25/2115:2510/18/21 8:19
9.9Diethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U84-66-2 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.9Dimethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U131-11-3 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.9Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U84-74-2 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.9Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U117-84-0 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
2.0Fluorantheneug/L EPA 8270D0.49 J, Q-2206-44-0 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
2.0Fluoreneug/L EPA 8270D4.6 J, QL-286-73-7 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.9Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U118-74-1 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 10 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57 E214202-02
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 17:10
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
9.9Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U77-47-4 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.9Hexachloroethaneug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U67-72-1 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
2.0Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U193-39-5 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
500Isophoroneug/L EPA 8270D500U78-59-1 10/25/2115:2510/18/21 8:19
990Naphthaleneug/L EPA 8270D580091-20-3 10/25/2116:4910/18/21 8:19
500Nitrobenzeneug/L EPA 8270D500U98-95-3 10/25/2115:2510/18/21 8:19
9.9n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U621-64-7 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.9n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U122-39-4 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.9Pentachlorophenolug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U87-86-5 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
2.0Phenanthreneug/L EPA 8270D3.585-01-8 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
9.9Phenolug/L EPA 8270D9.9 U108-95-2 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
2.0Pyreneug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U129-00-0 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
EPA 8270Dug/L100Acenaphthylenone (TIC)NJR4-8001314 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L20Dibenzothiophenesulfone (TIC)NJR4-8001501 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L40Dimethylnaphthalene (TIC)NJR4-6507 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L10Ethylnaphthalene (TIC)NJR4-8000051 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L100Fluorenone (TIC)NJR4-6621 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L20Isobenzofuranone (TIC)NJR4-8001500 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L50Naphthalenecarbonitrile (TIC)NJR4-8000140 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L20Naphthalic anhydride (TIC)NJR4-8000105 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L20Phenanthridinone (TIC)NJR4-8000020 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L70Unidentified Compound(s)JR4-6501 10/22/2114:0110/18/21 8:19
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 11 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58 E214202-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 17:28
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U1319-77-3 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.01,1-Biphenyl ug/L EPA 8270D110J, QC-292-52-4 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.01,4-Dioxane ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U123-91-1 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
411-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D120J, QL-290-12-0 10/25/2115:5310/18/21 8:19
102,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U58-90-2 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
102,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-95-4 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
102,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-06-2 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
102,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U120-83-2 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
102,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U105-67-9 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
202,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D20U51-28-5 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
102,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U121-14-2 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
102,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U606-20-2 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
102-Chloronaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-58-7 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
102-Chlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-57-8 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
102-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U534-52-1 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
412-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D23091-57-6 10/25/2115:5310/18/21 8:19
102-Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-48-7 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
102-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-74-4 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
102-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-75-5 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
103,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-94-1 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
103-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U99-09-2 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
104-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U101-55-3 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
104-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U59-50-7 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
104-Chloroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U106-47-8 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
104-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U7005-72-3 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
104-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-01-6 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
104-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-02-7 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.0Acenaphtheneug/L EPA 8270D9.583-32-9 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 12 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58 E214202-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 17:28
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
2.0Acenaphthyleneug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U208-96-8 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Acetophenoneug/L EPA 8270D10U98-86-2 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.0Anthraceneug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U120-12-7 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Atrazineug/L EPA 8270D10U, J, QL-1,
QR-1, QC-1
1912-24-9 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Benzaldehydeug/L EPA 8270D10U100-52-7 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.0Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U56-55-3 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.0Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U50-32-8 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.0Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U205-99-2 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.0Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U191-24-2 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.0Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U207-08-9 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Benzyl alcohol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-51-6 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U85-68-7 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U108-60-1 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-91-1 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-44-4 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-81-7 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Caprolactamug/L EPA 8270D10U105-60-2 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.0Carbazoleug/L EPA 8270D2.086-74-8 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.0Chryseneug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U218-01-9 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.0Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U53-70-3 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
41Dibenzofuranug/L EPA 8270D240132-64-9 10/25/2115:5310/18/21 8:19
10Diethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-66-2 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Dimethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U131-11-3 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-74-2 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-84-0 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.0Fluorantheneug/L EPA 8270D0.73 J, Q-2206-44-0 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.0Fluoreneug/L EPA 8270D0.82 J, QL-2, Q-286-73-7 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)ug/L EPA 8270D10U118-74-1 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 13 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58 E214202-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 17:28
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)ug/L EPA 8270D10U77-47-4 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Hexachloroethaneug/L EPA 8270D10U67-72-1 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.0Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U193-39-5 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Isophoroneug/L EPA 8270D10U78-59-1 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
410Naphthaleneug/L EPA 8270D300091-20-3 10/25/2117:1710/18/21 8:19
10Nitrobenzeneug/L EPA 8270D10U98-95-3 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U621-64-7 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U122-39-4 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Pentachlorophenolug/L EPA 8270D10U87-86-5 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.0Phenanthreneug/L EPA 8270D0.53 J, Q-285-01-8 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
10Phenolug/L EPA 8270D10U108-95-2 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
2.0Pyreneug/L EPA 8270D2.0 U129-00-0 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
EPA 8270Dug/L40Acenaphthylenone (TIC)NJR4-8001314 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L40Dimethylnaphthalene (TIC)NJR4-6507 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L100Fluorenone (TIC)NJR4-6621 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L10Hydroxyfluorenone (TIC)NJR4-8001502 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L30Naphthalenecarbonitrile (TIC)NJR4-8000140 10/22/2114:2910/18/21 8:19
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 14 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6 E214202-04
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 15:18
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U1319-77-3 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
411,1-Biphenyl ug/L EPA 8270D120J, QC-292-52-4 10/25/2116:2110/18/21 8:19
2.11,4-Dioxane ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U123-91-1 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
411-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D250J, QL-290-12-0 10/25/2116:2110/18/21 8:19
102,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U58-90-2 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
102,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-95-4 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
102,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-06-2 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
2102,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D210U120-83-2 10/25/2116:2110/18/21 8:19
2102,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D210U105-67-9 10/25/2116:2110/18/21 8:19
212,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D21U51-28-5 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
102,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U121-14-2 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
102,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L EPA 8270D10U606-20-2 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
102-Chloronaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-58-7 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
102-Chlorophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-57-8 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
102-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U534-52-1 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
412-Methylnaphthalene ug/L EPA 8270D58091-57-6 10/25/2116:2110/18/21 8:19
102-Methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U95-48-7 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
102-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U88-74-4 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
2102-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D210U88-75-5 10/25/2116:2110/18/21 8:19
103,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L EPA 8270D10U91-94-1 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
103-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U99-09-2 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
104-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U101-55-3 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
2104-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L EPA 8270D210U59-50-7 10/25/2116:2110/18/21 8:19
2104-Chloroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D210U, J, QC-1106-47-8 10/25/2116:2110/18/21 8:19
104-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U7005-72-3 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
104-Nitroaniline ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-01-6 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
104-Nitrophenol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-02-7 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
41Acenaphtheneug/L EPA 8270D13083-32-9 10/25/2116:2110/18/21 8:19
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 15 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6 E214202-04
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 15:18
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
2.1Acenaphthyleneug/L EPA 8270D4.2208-96-8 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
10Acetophenoneug/L EPA 8270D4.8 J, Q-298-86-2 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
2.1Anthraceneug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U120-12-7 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
10Atrazineug/L EPA 8270D10U, J, QL-1,
QR-1, QC-1
1912-24-9 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
10Benzaldehydeug/L EPA 8270D10U100-52-7 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
2.1Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U56-55-3 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
2.1Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U50-32-8 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
2.1Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U205-99-2 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
2.1Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U191-24-2 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
2.1Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U207-08-9 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
10Benzyl alcohol ug/L EPA 8270D10U100-51-6 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
10Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U85-68-7 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
10Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U108-60-1 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
210Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L EPA 8270D210U111-91-1 10/25/2116:2110/18/21 8:19
10bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether ug/L EPA 8270D10U111-44-4 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
10Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-81-7 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
210Caprolactamug/L EPA 8270D210U105-60-2 10/25/2116:2110/18/21 8:19
2.1Carbazoleug/L EPA 8270D1386-74-8 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
2.1Chryseneug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U218-01-9 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
2.1Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U53-70-3 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
41Dibenzofuranug/L EPA 8270D220132-64-9 10/25/2116:2110/18/21 8:19
10Diethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-66-2 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
10Dimethyl phthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U131-11-3 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
10Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U84-74-2 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
10Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L EPA 8270D10U117-84-0 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
2.1Fluorantheneug/L EPA 8270D7.4206-44-0 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
2.1Fluoreneug/L EPA 8270D56J, QL-286-73-7 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
10Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)ug/L EPA 8270D10U118-74-1 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 16 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6 E214202-04
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:10/13/21 15:18
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)ug/L EPA 8270D10U77-47-4 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
10Hexachloroethaneug/L EPA 8270D10U67-72-1 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
2.1Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U193-39-5 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
210Isophoroneug/L EPA 8270D210U78-59-1 10/25/2116:2110/18/21 8:19
410Naphthaleneug/L EPA 8270D920091-20-3 10/25/2117:4510/18/21 8:19
210Nitrobenzeneug/L EPA 8270D210U98-95-3 10/25/2116:2110/18/21 8:19
10n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U621-64-7 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
10n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L EPA 8270D10U122-39-4 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
10Pentachlorophenolug/L EPA 8270D10U87-86-5 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
2.1Phenanthreneug/L EPA 8270D5185-01-8 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
10Phenolug/L EPA 8270D10U108-95-2 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
2.1Pyreneug/L EPA 8270D2.1 U129-00-0 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
EPA 8270Dug/L200Acenaphthylenone (TIC)NJR4-8001314 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L30Anthracenedione (TIC)NJR4-6608 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L30Dimethylnaphthalene (TIC)NJR4-6507 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L200Fluorenone (TIC)NJR4-6621 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L30Naphthalenecarbonitrile (TIC)NJR4-8000140 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
EPA 8270Dug/L20Naphthalic anhydride (TIC)NJR4-8000105 10/22/2114:5710/18/21 8:19
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 17 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2110040 - E 3520 LLE
Blank (2110040-BLK1)Prepared: 10/18/21 Analyzed: 10/22/21
EPA 8270D
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/LU10 U
1,1-Biphenyl "U 2.0 U
1,4-Dioxane "U 2.0 U
1-Methylnaphthalene "U 2.0 U
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol "U 10 U
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol "U 10 U
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol "U 10 U
2,4-Dichlorophenol "U 10 U
2,4-Dimethylphenol "U 10 U
2,4-Dinitrophenol "U 20 U
2,4-Dinitrotoluene "U 10 U
2,6-Dinitrotoluene "U 10 U
2-Chloronaphthalene "U 10 U
2-Chlorophenol "U 10 U
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol "U 10 U
2-Methylnaphthalene "U 2.0 U
2-Methylphenol "U 10 U
2-Nitroaniline "U 10 U
2-Nitrophenol "U 10 U
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine "U 10 U
3-Nitroaniline "U 10 U
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether "U 10 U
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol "U 10 U
4-Chloroaniline "U 10 U
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether "U 10 U
4-Nitroaniline "U 10 U
4-Nitrophenol "U 10 U
Acenaphthene "U 2.0 U
Acenaphthylene "U 2.0 U
Acetophenone "U 10 U
Anthracene "U 2.0 U
Atrazine "U 10 U
Benzaldehyde "U 10 U
Benzo(a)anthracene "U 2.0 U
Benzo(a)pyrene "U 2.0 U
Benzo(b)fluoranthene "U 2.0 U
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene "U 2.0 U
Benzo(k)fluoranthene "U 2.0 U
Benzyl alcohol "U 10 U
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 18 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2110040 - E 3520 LLE
Blank (2110040-BLK1)Prepared: 10/18/21 Analyzed: 10/22/21
Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/LU10 U
Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether "U 10 U
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane "U 10 U
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether "U 10 U
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate "U 10 U
Caprolactam "U 10 U
Carbazole "U 2.0 U
Chrysene "U 2.0 U
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene "U 2.0 U
Dibenzofuran "U 2.0 U
Diethyl phthalate "U 10 U
Dimethyl phthalate "U 10 U
Di-n-butylphthalate "U 10 U
Di-n-octylphthalate "U 10 U
Fluoranthene "U 2.0 U
Fluorene "U 2.0 U
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)"U 10 U
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)"U 10 U
Hexachloroethane "U 10 U
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene "U 2.0 U
Isophorone "U 10 U
Naphthalene "U 2.0 U
Nitrobenzene "U 10 U
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine "U 10 U
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine "U 10 U
Pentachlorophenol "U 10 U
Phenanthrene "U 2.0 U
Phenol "U 10 U
Pyrene "U 2.0 U
Tentatively Identified Compounds "U 10 U
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 19 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2110040 - E 3520 LLE
LCS (2110040-BS1)Prepared: 10/18/21 Analyzed: 10/22/21
EPA 8270D
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L66.600 10 60.000 55-111111
1,1-Biphenyl "64.680 2.0 60.000 QC-251-118108
1,4-Dioxane "40.980 2.0 60.000 41-8968.3
1-Methylnaphthalene "84.510 2.0 60.000 QL-261-127141
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol "52.600 10 60.000 45-13487.7
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol "60.790 10 60.000 56-131101
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol "58.860 10 60.000 56-12898.1
2,4-Dichlorophenol "63.550 10 60.000 63-123106
2,4-Dimethylphenol "64.400 10 60.000 QL-244-106107
2,4-Dinitrophenol "122.94 20 120.00 49-128102
2,4-Dinitrotoluene "62.590 10 60.000 58-125104
2,6-Dinitrotoluene "62.590 10 60.000 60-122104
2-Chloronaphthalene "63.860 10 60.000 53-115106
2-Chlorophenol "57.300 10 60.000 55-11795.5
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol "59.090 10 60.000 62-12598.5
2-Methylnaphthalene "60.170 2.0 60.000 56-115100
2-Methylphenol "58.120 10 60.000 52-11196.9
2-Nitroaniline "63.440 10 60.000 58-121106
2-Nitrophenol "61.190 10 60.000 58-126102
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine "46.810 10 60.000 10-14478.0
3-Nitroaniline "54.610 10 60.000 38-14191.0
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether "61.450 10 60.000 61-117102
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol "64.620 10 60.000 64-122108
4-Chloroaniline "20.370 10 60.000 18-10234.0
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether "72.800 10 60.000 QL-255-117121
4-Nitroaniline "57.260 10 60.000 15-18595.4
4-Nitrophenol "55.820 10 60.000 38-13093.0
Acenaphthene "67.190 2.0 60.000 53-115112
Acenaphthylene "64.570 2.0 60.000 53-118108
Acetophenone "63.190 10 60.000 60-112105
Anthracene "62.060 2.0 60.000 65-110103
Atrazine "8.0000 10 60.000 QC-1,
QL-1, J
53-12813.3
Benzaldehyde "54.220 10 60.000 55-15290.4
Benzo(a)anthracene "58.160 2.0 60.000 52-12196.9
Benzo(a)pyrene "59.190 2.0 60.000 60-11598.6
Benzo(b)fluoranthene "63.880 2.0 60.000 58-117106
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene "63.100 2.0 60.000 QL-245-101105
Benzo(k)fluoranthene "73.010 2.0 60.000 64-124122
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 20 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2110040 - E 3520 LLE
LCS (2110040-BS1)Prepared: 10/18/21 Analyzed: 10/22/21
Benzyl alcohol ug/L52.490 10 60.000 49-11487.5
Benzyl butyl phthalate "54.700 10 60.000 58-12991.2
Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether "59.900 10 60.000 55-11399.8
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane "63.180 10 60.000 59-115105
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether "59.820 10 60.000 53-11799.7
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate "59.850 10 60.000 56-13099.8
Caprolactam "41.660 10 60.000 33-9469.4
Carbazole "55.230 2.0 60.000 68-11492.0
Chrysene "63.810 2.0 60.000 58-122106
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene "73.970 2.0 60.000 QL-246-113123
Dibenzofuran "63.350 2.0 60.000 50-133106
Diethyl phthalate "66.280 10 60.000 61-118110
Dimethyl phthalate "65.720 10 60.000 58-120110
Di-n-butylphthalate "62.230 10 60.000 63-117104
Di-n-octylphthalate "56.700 10 60.000 60-12594.5
Fluoranthene "63.130 2.0 60.000 68-113105
Fluorene "69.930 2.0 60.000 60-117117
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)"63.360 10 60.000 56-120106
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)"57.720 10 60.000 18-10396.2
Hexachloroethane "49.830 10 60.000 35-10583.0
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene "69.450 2.0 60.000 QL-247-110116
Isophorone "64.470 10 60.000 60-114107
Naphthalene "62.010 2.0 60.000 55-113103
Nitrobenzene "62.960 10 60.000 59-114105
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine "61.730 10 60.000 58-113103
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine "59.770 10 60.000 65-11599.6
Pentachlorophenol "53.140 10 60.000 47-12288.6
Phenanthrene "62.900 2.0 60.000 63-111105
Phenol "57.420 10 60.000 47-10495.7
Pyrene "52.890 2.0 60.000 48-12988.2
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 21 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2110040 - E 3520 LLE
LCS Dup (2110040-BSD1)Prepared: 10/18/21 Analyzed: 10/22/21
EPA 8270D
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L65.820 10 60.000 3055-111110 1.18
1,1-Biphenyl "65.350 2.0 60.000 18 QC-251-118109 1.03
1,4-Dioxane "39.050 2.0 60.000 5041-8965.1 4.82
1-Methylnaphthalene "84.140 2.0 60.000 21 QL-261-127140 0.439
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol "52.680 10 60.000 1245-13487.8 0.152
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol "60.930 10 60.000 1456-131102 0.230
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol "59.040 10 60.000 1656-12898.4 0.305
2,4-Dichlorophenol "62.190 10 60.000 2563-123104 2.16
2,4-Dimethylphenol "58.150 10 60.000 2744-10696.9 10.2
2,4-Dinitrophenol "123.52 20 120.00 1749-128103 0.471
2,4-Dinitrotoluene "63.130 10 60.000 1058-125105 0.859
2,6-Dinitrotoluene "63.130 10 60.000 1260-122105 0.859
2-Chloronaphthalene "65.070 10 60.000 1953-115108 1.88
2-Chlorophenol "57.930 10 60.000 3555-11796.6 1.09
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol "58.970 10 60.000 1262-12598.3 0.203
2-Methylnaphthalene "60.280 2.0 60.000 2256-115100 0.183
2-Methylphenol "59.220 10 60.000 3352-11198.7 1.87
2-Nitroaniline "63.820 10 60.000 1358-121106 0.597
2-Nitrophenol "60.150 10 60.000 2858-126100 1.71
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine "47.940 10 60.000 5310-14479.9 2.39
3-Nitroaniline "54.600 10 60.000 1938-14191.0 0.0183
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether "62.430 10 60.000 1261-117104 1.58
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol "63.260 10 60.000 1764-122105 2.13
4-Chloroaniline "21.820 10 60.000 4918-10236.4 6.87
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether "72.900 10 60.000 17 QL-255-117122 0.137
4-Nitroaniline "57.920 10 60.000 1915-18596.5 1.15
4-Nitrophenol "56.720 10 60.000 2338-13094.5 1.60
Acenaphthene "67.770 2.0 60.000 1453-115113 0.860
Acenaphthylene "64.840 2.0 60.000 1453-118108 0.417
Acetophenone "63.220 10 60.000 2760-112105 0.0475
Anthracene "62.760 2.0 60.000 1065-110105 1.12
Atrazine "8.0600 10 60.000 22 QC-1,
QL-1, J
53-12813.4 0.747
Benzaldehyde "54.510 10 60.000 2855-15290.8 0.533
Benzo(a)anthracene "59.520 2.0 60.000 1052-12199.2 2.31
Benzo(a)pyrene "61.030 2.0 60.000 1060-115102 3.06
Benzo(b)fluoranthene "65.840 2.0 60.000 2258-117110 3.02
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene "64.100 2.0 60.000 20 QL-245-101107 1.57
Benzo(k)fluoranthene "75.640 2.0 60.000 19 QL-264-124126 3.54
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 22 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2110040 - E 3520 LLE
LCS Dup (2110040-BSD1)Prepared: 10/18/21 Analyzed: 10/22/21
Benzyl alcohol ug/L52.640 10 60.000 3449-11487.7 0.285
Benzyl butyl phthalate "56.000 10 60.000 1058-12993.3 2.35
Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether "60.400 10 60.000 2055-113101 0.831
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane "61.840 10 60.000 2559-115103 2.14
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether "61.220 10 60.000 2453-117102 2.31
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate "61.650 10 60.000 3956-130103 2.96
Caprolactam "42.900 10 60.000 3633-9471.5 2.93
Carbazole "55.140 2.0 60.000 1468-11491.9 0.163
Chrysene "65.200 2.0 60.000 1058-122109 2.15
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene "74.060 2.0 60.000 20 QL-246-113123 0.122
Dibenzofuran "64.160 2.0 60.000 1350-133107 1.27
Diethyl phthalate "66.260 10 60.000 1061-118110 0.0302
Dimethyl phthalate "65.340 10 60.000 1158-120109 0.580
Di-n-butylphthalate "63.410 10 60.000 1163-117106 1.88
Di-n-octylphthalate "57.630 10 60.000 1260-12596.0 1.63
Fluoranthene "64.500 2.0 60.000 1068-113108 2.15
Fluorene "70.720 2.0 60.000 12 QL-260-117118 1.12
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)"65.380 10 60.000 1256-120109 3.14
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)"59.460 10 60.000 3218-10399.1 2.97
Hexachloroethane "49.730 10 60.000 4535-10582.9 0.201
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene "70.330 2.0 60.000 20 QL-247-110117 1.26
Isophorone "63.480 10 60.000 2060-114106 1.55
Naphthalene "61.020 2.0 60.000 2755-113102 1.61
Nitrobenzene "61.970 10 60.000 2959-114103 1.58
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine "63.040 10 60.000 2458-113105 2.10
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine "59.910 10 60.000 1065-11599.8 0.234
Pentachlorophenol "54.090 10 60.000 1147-12290.2 1.77
Phenanthrene "63.430 2.0 60.000 1063-111106 0.839
Phenol "57.800 10 60.000 3847-10496.3 0.660
Pyrene "53.390 2.0 60.000 1048-12989.0 0.941
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 23 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2110040 - E 3520 LLE
Duplicate (2110040-DUP1)Prepared: 10/18/21 Analyzed: 10/22/21 Source: E214202-01
EPA 8270D
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/LU10 U 200 U
1,1-Biphenyl "99.580 2.0 95.886 200 QC-2, J3.78
1,4-Dioxane "U 2.0 U 200 U
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2,4-Dichlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2,4-Dimethylphenol "U 10 U 200 U
2,4-Dinitrophenol "U 20 U 200 U
2,4-Dinitrotoluene "U 10 U 200 U
2,6-Dinitrotoluene "U 10 U 200 U
2-Chloronaphthalene "U 10 U 200 U
2-Chlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol "U 10 U 200 U
2-Methylphenol "U 10 U 200 U
2-Nitroaniline "U 10 U 200 U
2-Nitrophenol "U 10 U 200 U
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine "U 10 U 200 U
3-Nitroaniline "U 10 U 200 U
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether "U 10 U 200 U
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol "U 10 U 200 U
4-Chloroaniline "U 10 U 200 U
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether "U 10 U 200 U
4-Nitroaniline "U 10 U 200 U
4-Nitrophenol "U 10 U 200 U
Acenaphthylene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Acetophenone "U 10 U 200 U
Anthracene "4.4400 2.0 3.8549 20014.1
Atrazine "U 10 U 200 QL-1,
QR-1, J,
QC-1, U
Benzaldehyde "U 10 U 200 U
Benzo(a)anthracene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Benzo(a)pyrene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Benzo(b)fluoranthene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Benzo(k)fluoranthene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Benzyl alcohol "U 10 U 200 U
Benzyl butyl phthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether "U 10 U 200 U
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 24 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2110040 - E 3520 LLE
Duplicate (2110040-DUP1)Prepared: 10/18/21 Analyzed: 10/22/21 Source: E214202-01
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/LU10 U 200 U
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether "U 10 U 200 U
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Caprolactam "U 10 U 200 U
Chrysene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Diethyl phthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Dimethyl phthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Di-n-butylphthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Di-n-octylphthalate "U 10 U 200 U
Fluoranthene "11.860 2.0 11.503 2003.06
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)"U 10 U 200 U
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)"U 10 U 200 U
Hexachloroethane "U 10 U 200 U
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene "U 2.0 U 200 U
Isophorone "U 10 U 200 U
Nitrobenzene "U 10 U 200 U
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine "U 10 U 200 U
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine "U 10 U 200 U
Pentachlorophenol "U 10 U 200 U
Phenol "U 10 U 200 U
Pyrene "5.3800 2.0 5.3886 2000.160
Tentatively Identified Compounds "U 10 U 200 U
Duplicate (2110040-DUP2)Prepared: 10/18/21 Analyzed: 10/25/21 Source: E214202-01RE1
EPA 8270D
1-Methylnaphthalene ug/L556.00 40 537.41 200 QL-2, J3.40
2-Methylnaphthalene "1058.2 40 1012.0 2004.46
Acenaphthene "587.60 40 590.88 2000.557
Carbazole "147.00 40 153.16 2004.10
Dibenzofuran "283.60 40 283.73 2000.0460
Fluorene "193.80 40 190.05 200 J, QL-21.95
Phenanthrene "229.40 40 221.35 2003.57
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 25 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2110040 - E 3520 LLE
Duplicate (2110040-DUP3)Prepared: 10/18/21 Analyzed: 10/22/21 Source: E214202-01RE2
EPA 8270D
Naphthalene ug/L4231.0 200 2752.3 20042.3
MRL Verification (2110040-PS1)Prepared: 10/18/21 Analyzed: 10/22/21
EPA 8270D
(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L7.7600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J48-10577.6
1,1-Biphenyl "1.4000 2.0 2.0000 QC-2,
MRL-2, J
50-10470.0
1,4-Dioxane "0.92000 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J14-11046.0
1-Methylnaphthalene "1.7600 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J56-11788.0
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol "7.1500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J31-11171.5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol "7.1500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J42-11571.5
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol "6.9700 10 10.000 MRL-2, J47-11069.7
2,4-Dichlorophenol "7.6300 10 10.000 MRL-2, J49-11676.3
2,4-Dimethylphenol "9.6600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J16-11196.6
2,4-Dinitrophenol "18.690 20 20.000 MRL-2, J10-12493.4
2,4-Dinitrotoluene "8.2900 10 10.000 MRL-2, J53-10882.9
2,6-Dinitrotoluene "8.2900 10 10.000 MRL-2, J55-10682.9
2-Chloronaphthalene "7.1500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J51-10471.5
2-Chlorophenol "7.5500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J46-11175.5
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol "8.7600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J26-11687.6
2-Methylnaphthalene "1.3500 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J51-10667.5
2-Methylphenol "7.3700 10 10.000 MRL-2, J42-10873.7
2-Nitroaniline "8.0300 10 10.000 MRL-2, J48-10980.3
2-Nitrophenol "7.5400 10 10.000 MRL-2, J46-12075.4
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine "5.0400 10 10.000 MRL-2, J10-10350.4
3-Nitroaniline "7.0500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J28-11870.5
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether "7.1500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J58-10671.5
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol "7.6000 10 10.000 MRL-2, J49-11876.0
4-Chloroaniline "2.4800 10 10.000 MRL-2, J20-8524.8
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether "7.4200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J49-10274.2
4-Nitroaniline "7.7600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J10-16577.6
4-Nitrophenol "6.6500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J11-11666.5
Acenaphthene "1.4000 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J51-10070.0
Acenaphthylene "1.4600 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J52-10473.0
Acetophenone "7.3300 10 10.000 MRL-2, J56-10873.3
Anthracene "1.4700 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J48-10873.5
Atrazine "1.1200 10 10.000 QC-1,
MRL-2,
QR-1, J
46-12611.2
Benzaldehyde "7.9700 10 10.000 MRL-2, J40-16979.7
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 26 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA) - Quality Control
US-EPA, Region 4, LSASD
Batch 2110040 - E 3520 LLE
MRL Verification (2110040-PS1)Prepared: 10/18/21 Analyzed: 10/22/21
Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L1.4400 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J52-11772.0
Benzo(a)pyrene "1.5200 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J48-11676.0
Benzo(b)fluoranthene "1.4200 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J31-14271.0
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene "1.8400 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J37-11592.0
Benzo(k)fluoranthene "1.6500 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J29-14582.5
Benzyl alcohol "5.8500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J12-13358.5
Benzyl butyl phthalate "7.5100 10 10.000 MRL-2, J60-13675.1
Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether "7.5800 10 10.000 MRL-2, J48-10775.8
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane "7.6100 10 10.000 MRL-2, J53-10776.1
bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether "7.5000 10 10.000 MRL-2, J47-10475.0
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate "6.4600 10 10.000 MRL-2, J19-17964.6
Caprolactam "6.8200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J32-8768.2
Carbazole "1.3500 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J67-11967.5
Chrysene "1.3800 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J55-11669.0
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene "1.8100 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J33-11890.5
Dibenzofuran "1.4600 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J53-11373.0
Diethyl phthalate "8.2900 10 10.000 MRL-2, J53-12982.9
Dimethyl phthalate "8.2800 10 10.000 MRL-2, J59-10782.8
Di-n-butylphthalate "8.6900 10 10.000 MRL-2, J69-13986.9
Di-n-octylphthalate "7.5000 10 10.000 MRL-2, J62-12975.0
Fluoranthene "1.4800 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J60-11274.0
Fluorene "1.3800 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J55-10169.0
Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)"7.2900 10 10.000 MRL-2, J50-10572.9
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)"11.010 10 10.000 MRL-2,
QR-2
10-85110
Hexachloroethane "6.1200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J26-8961.2
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene "1.7300 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J37-11486.5
Isophorone "8.2500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J54-10882.5
Naphthalene "1.4900 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J38-13774.5
Nitrobenzene "7.8700 10 10.000 MRL-2, J54-11078.7
n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine "7.9800 10 10.000 MRL-2, J49-10679.8
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine "7.0500 10 10.000 MRL-2, J55-10770.5
Pentachlorophenol "7.4200 10 10.000 MRL-2, J20-13674.2
Phenanthrene "1.5000 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J55-11575.0
Phenol "7.9700 10 10.000 MRL-2, J44-9779.7
Pyrene "1.4200 2.0 2.0000 MRL-2, J51-12271.0
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 27 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0009, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Stacie Masters
Notes and Definitions for QC Samples
U The analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit.
J The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
MRL-2 MRL verification for Non-Potable Water matrix
QC-1 Analyte concentration low in continuing calibration verification standard
QC-2 Analyte concentration high in continuing calibration verification standard
QL-1 Laboratory Control Spike Recovery less than method control limits
QL-2 Laboratory Control Spike Recovery greater than method control limits
QR-1 MRL verification recovery less than lower control limits.
QR-2 MRL verification recovery greater than upper control limits.
11/9/21 16:41E214202 SVOA FINAL 11 09 21 1641Page 28 of 28
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
January 27, 2022
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
FROM:
FINAL Analytical Report
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote
4LSASD-QAPSB
Denise Goddard
Quality Assurance Section, Chemist
Quality Assurance Section
Floyd Wellborn, ChiefTHRU:
TO:Joydeb Majumder
Attached are the final results for the analytical groups listed below. These analyses were performed in accordance with
the associated contract Statement Of Work (SOW). In general, project data quality objectives have not been used to
evaluate these data prior to release by the Quality Assurance Section. For a listing of specific data qualifiers and
explanations, please refer to the Data Qualifier Definitions included in this report.
Analyses Included in this report:Method Used:
Dissolved Metals (DMTL)
Dissolved Metals Contract SOW (Water)
Total Metals (TMTL)
Total Metals CLP Inorganics (Water)
1/27/22 14:19C215303 DMTL TMTL FINAL 01 27 22 1419Page 1 of 12
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Report Narrative for Work Order: C215303 Analysis: DMTL
Inorganic Data Review and Validation Report
Site Name: Holcomb Creosote, Yadkinville, NC
Case No.: 49842, Project No.: 22-0052, Work Order Nos.: C215302(PES), C215303
ELEMENT Sample IDs.: C215302-01-02 (PES), C215303-01-08
Sampling Date(s): 12/7/21
Validated Time of Sample Receipt: 12/9/21
Laboratory Performing Inorganic Analyses: Chemtech Consulting Group, Mountainside, NJ
Date Received from Lab: 12/29/21 (SMO portal)
Analyses conducted: Total Metals and Dissolved Metals (ICP-AES)

This report is being re-issued to combine the total metals and dissolved metals data into one report instead of producing two separate
reports.
The ESAT Work Team has reviewed the above-captioned CLP data package consisting of 10 water samples for total and/or dissolved
metals by ICP-AES analyses according to the contract Statement of Work SFAM01.1 (SOW) and EPA guidelines. This package presents
acceptable contractual and technical performance with qualifications. Additonal details are provided below.
Examination of laboratory blanks revealed apparent low-level contamination with several metals. Reported detection limits were adjusted
as high as ten times the blank levels to discount possible false positives due to contamination in laboratory blanks.
ICP-AES Analysis
PE Sample Results
The PES recoveries for total metals were scored as within limits by the web-based SPS Web software except for selenium which was
scored warning low in one PES only. All selenium results were considered estimated and “J” qualified.
Other QA/QC Results
Arsenic was reported as 13 ug/L in the original analysis of sample C215303-07 but as not detected at the CRQL (Contract Required
Quantitation Limit) of 10 ug/L in the duplicate analysis performed. The arsenic result for sample C215303-07 is considered estimated and
“J” qualified.
A Stage 4 validation consisting of manual review was performed on the inorganic samples submitted for this case.
cc: Nardina Turner
1/27/22 14:19C215303 DMTL TMTL FINAL 01 27 22 1419Page 2 of 12
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Date CollectedMatrixLaboratory IDSample ID
SAMPLES INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
MD#D#
BLT0BLT0MW-2 C215303-01 Groundwater 12/7/21 16:37
BLT4BLT4MW-2_Dis C215303-02 Groundwater 12/7/21 16:37
BLT1BLT1MW-57 C215303-03 Groundwater 12/7/21 15:22
BLT5BLT5MW-57_Dis C215303-04 Groundwater 12/7/21 15:22
BLT2BLT2MW-58 C215303-05 Groundwater 12/7/21 16:26
BLT6BLT6MW-58_Dis C215303-06 Groundwater 12/7/21 16:26
BLT3BLT3MW-6 C215303-07 Groundwater 12/7/21 14:18
BLT7BLT7MW-6_Dis C215303-08 Groundwater 12/7/21 14:18
1/27/22 14:19C215303 DMTL TMTL FINAL 01 27 22 1419Page 3 of 12
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
DATA QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS
U The analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit.
B-4 Level in blank impacts MRLs.
CLP25 PE sample recovery scored as warning-low.
CLP36 Identification/Concentration of analyte not confirmed by ICP-MS.
J The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
Q-2 Result greater than MDL but less than MRL.
QM-4 Matrix Precision outside method control limits
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
CAS Chemical Abstracts Service
Note: Analytes with no known CAS identifiers have been assigned codes beginning with "E", the EPA ID as assigned by
the EPA Substance Registry System (www.epa.gov/srs), or beginning with "R4-", a unique identifier assigned by the EPA
Region 4 laboratory.
MDL Method Detection Limit - The minimum concentration of a substance (an analyte) that can be measured and
reported with a 99% confidence that the analyte concentration is greater than zero.
MRL Minimum Reporting Limit - Analyte concentration that corresponds to the lowest demonstrated level of acceptable
quantitation. The MRL is sample-specific and accounts for preparation weights and volumes, dilutions, and
moisture content of soil/sediments.
TIC Tentatively Identified Compound - An analyte identified based on a match with the instrument software's mass
spectral library. A calibration standard has not been analyzed to confirm the compound's identification or the
estimated concentration reported.
1/27/22 14:19C215303 DMTL TMTL FINAL 01 27 22 1419Page 4 of 12
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Total Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2 C215303-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 16:37
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT0 CHM
MD No: BLT0 CHM
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/13/21Aluminumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P140J, Q-27429-90-5
60 12/13/21Antimonyug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/13/21Arsenicug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P7.2 J, CLP36, Q-27440-38-2
200 12/13/21Bariumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P160J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/13/21Berylliumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/13/21Cadmiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/13/21Calciumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P310007440-70-2
10 12/13/21Chromiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P9.5 J, Q-27440-47-3
50 12/13/21Cobaltug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P17J, Q-27440-48-4
25 12/13/21Copperug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2.8 J, Q-27440-50-8
100 12/13/21Ironug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P160007439-89-6
10 12/13/21Leadug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P147439-92-1
5000 12/13/21Magnesiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P91007439-95-4
15 12/13/21Manganeseug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P160007439-96-5
40 12/13/21Nickelug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P8.8 J, Q-27440-02-0
5000 12/13/21Potassiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P3200J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/13/21Seleniumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U, J, CLP257782-49-2
10 12/13/21Silverug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/13/21Sodiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P190007440-23-5
25 12/13/21Thalliumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/13/21Vanadiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P14J, Q-27440-62-2
60 12/13/21Zincug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P627440-66-6
1/27/22 14:19C215303 DMTL TMTL FINAL 01 27 22 1419Page 5 of 12
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Dissolved Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2_Dis C215303-02
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 16:37
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT4 CHM
MD No: BLT4 CHM
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/13/21Aluminumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/13/21Antimonyug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/13/21Arsenicug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/13/21Bariumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/13/21Berylliumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/13/21Cadmiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/13/21Calciumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P310007440-70-2
10 12/13/21Chromiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P107440-47-3
50 12/13/21Cobaltug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-48-4
25 12/13/21Copperug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/13/21Ironug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P100U7439-89-6
10 12/13/21Leadug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P12U, B-47439-92-1
5000 12/13/21Magnesiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P94007439-95-4
15 12/13/21Manganeseug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P130007439-96-5
40 12/13/21Nickelug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.1 J, Q-27440-02-0
5000 12/13/21Potassiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P3000J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/13/21Seleniumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P14J, CLP36, Q-27782-49-2
10 12/13/21Silverug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/13/21Sodiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P190007440-23-5
25 12/13/21Thalliumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/13/21Vanadiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P13J, Q-27440-62-2
60 12/13/21Zincug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-66-6
1/27/22 14:19C215303 DMTL TMTL FINAL 01 27 22 1419Page 6 of 12
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Total Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57 C215303-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 15:22
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT1 CHM
MD No: BLT1 CHM
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/13/21Aluminumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P51J, Q-27429-90-5
60 12/13/21Antimonyug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/13/21Arsenicug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P16CLP367440-38-2
200 12/13/21Bariumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P82J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/13/21Berylliumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/13/21Cadmiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/13/21Calciumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P750007440-70-2
10 12/13/21Chromiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1307440-47-3
50 12/13/21Cobaltug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-48-4
25 12/13/21Copperug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/13/21Ironug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P100U7439-89-6
10 12/13/21Leadug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P127439-92-1
5000 12/13/21Magnesiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P210007439-95-4
15 12/13/21Manganeseug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P150007439-96-5
40 12/13/21Nickelug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1.9 J, Q-27440-02-0
5000 12/13/21Potassiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50007440-09-7
35 12/13/21Seleniumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U, J, CLP257782-49-2
10 12/13/21Silverug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/13/21Sodiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1300007440-23-5
25 12/13/21Thalliumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/13/21Vanadiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P11J, Q-27440-62-2
60 12/13/21Zincug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P647440-66-6
1/27/22 14:19C215303 DMTL TMTL FINAL 01 27 22 1419Page 7 of 12
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Dissolved Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57_Dis C215303-04
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 15:22
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT5 CHM
MD No: BLT5 CHM
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/13/21Aluminumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P19J, Q-27429-90-5
60 12/13/21Antimonyug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/13/21Arsenicug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/13/21Bariumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P39J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/13/21Berylliumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/13/21Cadmiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/13/21Calciumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P820007440-70-2
10 12/13/21Chromiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1507440-47-3
50 12/13/21Cobaltug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-48-4
25 12/13/21Copperug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/13/21Ironug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P100U7439-89-6
10 12/13/21Leadug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P12U, B-47439-92-1
5000 12/13/21Magnesiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P230007439-95-4
15 12/13/21Manganeseug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P7507439-96-5
40 12/13/21Nickelug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P40U7440-02-0
5000 12/13/21Potassiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P4900J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/13/21Seleniumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U, J, CLP257782-49-2
10 12/13/21Silverug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/13/21Sodiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1300007440-23-5
25 12/13/21Thalliumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/13/21Vanadiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/13/21Zincug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P17J, Q-27440-66-6
1/27/22 14:19C215303 DMTL TMTL FINAL 01 27 22 1419Page 8 of 12
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Total Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58 C215303-05
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 16:26
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT2 CHM
MD No: BLT2 CHM
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/13/21Aluminumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P4407429-90-5
60 12/13/21Antimonyug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/13/21Arsenicug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/13/21Bariumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P15007440-39-3
5.0 12/13/21Berylliumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/13/21Cadmiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/13/21Calciumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P110007440-70-2
10 12/13/21Chromiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P157440-47-3
50 12/13/21Cobaltug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10J, Q-27440-48-4
25 12/13/21Copperug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/13/21Ironug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P46007439-89-6
10 12/13/21Leadug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P197439-92-1
5000 12/13/21Magnesiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P2000J, Q-27439-95-4
45 12/13/21Manganeseug/L 12/26/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P330007439-96-5
40 12/13/21Nickelug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P6.3 J, Q-27440-02-0
5000 12/13/21Potassiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1600J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/13/21Seleniumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U, J, CLP257782-49-2
10 12/13/21Silverug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/13/21Sodiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P180007440-23-5
25 12/13/21Thalliumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/13/21Vanadiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P29J, Q-27440-62-2
60 12/13/21Zincug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P13J, Q-27440-66-6
1/27/22 14:19C215303 DMTL TMTL FINAL 01 27 22 1419Page 9 of 12
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Dissolved Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58_Dis C215303-06
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 16:26
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT6 CHM
MD No: BLT6 CHM
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/13/21Aluminumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/13/21Antimonyug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/13/21Arsenicug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/13/21Bariumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P32J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/13/21Berylliumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/13/21Cadmiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/13/21Calciumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P68007440-70-2
10 12/13/21Chromiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P8.9 J, Q-27440-47-3
50 12/13/21Cobaltug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-48-4
25 12/13/21Copperug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/13/21Ironug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P100U7439-89-6
10 12/13/21Leadug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P16U, B-47439-92-1
5000 12/13/21Magnesiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1700J, Q-27439-95-4
15 12/13/21Manganeseug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P4407439-96-5
40 12/13/21Nickelug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P40U7440-02-0
5000 12/13/21Potassiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1100J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/13/21Seleniumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U, J, CLP257782-49-2
10 12/13/21Silverug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/13/21Sodiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P170007440-23-5
25 12/13/21Thalliumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/13/21Vanadiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/13/21Zincug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-66-6
1/27/22 14:19C215303 DMTL TMTL FINAL 01 27 22 1419Page 10 of 12
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Total Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6 C215303-07
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 14:18
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT3 CHM
MD No: BLT3 CHM
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/13/21Aluminumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25J, Q-27429-90-5
60 12/13/21Antimonyug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/13/21Arsenicug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P13J, CLP36, QM-47440-38-2
200 12/13/21Bariumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P89J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/13/21Berylliumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/13/21Cadmiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/13/21Calciumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1500J, Q-27440-70-2
10 12/13/21Chromiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P647440-47-3
50 12/13/21Cobaltug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P6.9 J, Q-27440-48-4
25 12/13/21Copperug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P9.7 J, Q-27440-50-8
100 12/13/21Ironug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P36007439-89-6
10 12/13/21Leadug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P117439-92-1
5000 12/13/21Magnesiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P600J, Q-27439-95-4
15 12/13/21Manganeseug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P24007439-96-5
40 12/13/21Nickelug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P757440-02-0
5000 12/13/21Potassiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P690J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/13/21Seleniumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U, J, CLP257782-49-2
10 12/13/21Silverug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/13/21Sodiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P280007440-23-5
25 12/13/21Thalliumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/13/21Vanadiumug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/13/21Zincug/L 12/23/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P15J, Q-27440-66-6
1/27/22 14:19C215303 DMTL TMTL FINAL 01 27 22 1419Page 11 of 12
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Denise Goddard
Dissolved Metals
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6_Dis C215303-08
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 14:18
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT7 CHM
MD No: BLT7 CHM
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
200 12/13/21Aluminumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P200U7429-90-5
60 12/13/21Antimonyug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P60U7440-36-0
10 12/13/21Arsenicug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-38-2
200 12/13/21Bariumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P91J, Q-27440-39-3
5.0 12/13/21Berylliumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-41-7
5.0 12/13/21Cadmiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P5.0 U7440-43-9
5000 12/13/21Calciumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P1600J, Q-27440-70-2
10 12/13/21Chromiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P467440-47-3
50 12/13/21Cobaltug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P7.1 J, Q-27440-48-4
25 12/13/21Copperug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-50-8
100 12/13/21Ironug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P32007439-89-6
10 12/13/21Leadug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P12U, B-47439-92-1
5000 12/13/21Magnesiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P600J, Q-27439-95-4
15 12/13/21Manganeseug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P26007439-96-5
40 12/13/21Nickelug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P907440-02-0
5000 12/13/21Potassiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P630J, Q-27440-09-7
35 12/13/21Seleniumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P35U, J, CLP257782-49-2
10 12/13/21Silverug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P10U7440-22-4
5000 12/13/21Sodiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P270007440-23-5
25 12/13/21Thalliumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P25U7440-28-0
50 12/13/21Vanadiumug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P50U7440-62-2
60 12/13/21Zincug/L 12/20/21 CLP SFAM01.1 P19J, Q-27440-66-6
1/27/22 14:19C215303 DMTL TMTL FINAL 01 27 22 1419Page 12 of 12
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
January 28, 2022
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:
FROM:
FINAL Analytical Report
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote
4LSASD-QAPSB
Jeffrey Wilmoth
Quality Assurance Section, Chemist
Quality Assurance Section
Floyd Wellborn, ChiefTHRU:
TO:Joydeb Majumder
Attached are the final results for the analytical groups listed below. These analyses were performed in accordance with
the associated contract Statement Of Work (SOW). In general, project data quality objectives have not been used to
evaluate these data prior to release by the Quality Assurance Section. For a listing of specific data qualifiers and
explanations, please refer to the Data Qualifier Definitions included in this report.
Analyses Included in this report:Method Used:
Semi Volatile Organics (SVOA)
Semivolatile organic compounds CLP BNA (Water)
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 1 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Report Narrative for Work Order: C215303 Analysis: SVOA
Organic Data Review and Validation Report
Site Name: Holcomb Creosote, Yadkinville, NC
CLP Case No. 49842, Element® Sample Nos. C215303-01, 03, 05, 07, C215301-01 (PES)
Sampling Date(s): 12/7/21
Validated Time of Sample Receipt: 12/9/21
Laboratory Performing Organic Analysis: Chemtech Consulting Group, Mountainside, NJ
Date Received from Lab: 12/29/21 (posted at SMO portal)
Analyses conducted: Semivolatile Extractables
The ESAT Work Team reviewed data for 4 water samples analyzed for Semivolatile Extractables only, per CLP statement
of Work (SOW) SFAM01.1.
The analytical results were reported in one sample delivery group (SDG) by the laboratory. One performance evaluation
sample (PES) for evaluating the laboratory’s performance with using the method was submitted to the laboratory.
A Stage 4 validation consisting of an electronic/manual review (S4VEM) was performed on the organic samples submitted
for this case. The data package presents acceptable technical performance with qualifications.
The laboratory satisfied all contractual and technical holding time limits.
All results associated with erratic initial calibration (ICAL)) performance were flagged “J” with the appropriate Element®
qualifier (CLP16). The percent difference between an initial calibration (ICAL) and a second source verification standard
exceeded 20% for Benzaldehyde. The associated Benzaldehyde results were qualified “J” (QC-3). Deuterated
Monitoring Compounds (DMCs) were used as surrogates in each sample for GC/MS analysis to monitor extraction
efficiency.
Pertinent data quality factors are discussed below.
1.The performance evaluation sample (PES) recoveries for Semivolatile Extractables were scored within limits by
the web-based SPS Web software. Therefore, no data qualification was required based on these criteria.
2.Percent recovery of the DMC 2,4-Dichlorophenol-d3 was less the lower QC limit in sample C215303-07. The
associated results were non-detects and were qualified “UJ” (QS-3).
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 2 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Data qualification factors are explained by the Region 4 - specific qualifier definitions which are included elsewhere in this
report. Further details are provided in the complete data review report, which is on file in the Region 4 LSASD Records
Center.
cc: Nardina Turner
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 3 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Date CollectedMatrixLaboratory IDSample ID
SAMPLES INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
MD#D#
BLT0BLT0MW-2 C215303-01 Groundwater 12/7/21 16:37
BLT1BLT1MW-57 C215303-03 Groundwater 12/7/21 15:22
BLT2BLT2MW-58 C215303-05 Groundwater 12/7/21 16:26
BLT3BLT3MW-6 C215303-07 Groundwater 12/7/21 14:18
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 4 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
DATA QUALIFIER DEFINITIONS
U The analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit.
CLP01 Concentration reported is less than the lowest standard on calibration curve
CLP15 TIC Results Reported as Identified by Lab - IDs Not Verified
CLP16 Initial Calibration Response Erratic
J The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate.
NJ Presumptive evidence that analyte is present; reported as a tentative identification with an estimated value.
QC-3 Analyte calibration criteria not met
QS-3 Surrogate recovery is lower than established control limits.
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
CAS Chemical Abstracts Service
Note: Analytes with no known CAS identifiers have been assigned codes beginning with "E", the EPA ID as assigned by
the EPA Substance Registry System (www.epa.gov/srs), or beginning with "R4-", a unique identifier assigned by the EPA
Region 4 laboratory.
MDL Method Detection Limit - The minimum concentration of a substance (an analyte) that can be measured and
reported with a 99% confidence that the analyte concentration is greater than zero.
MRL Minimum Reporting Limit - Analyte concentration that corresponds to the lowest demonstrated level of acceptable
quantitation. The MRL is sample-specific and accounts for preparation weights and volumes, dilutions, and
moisture content of soil/sediments.
TIC Tentatively Identified Compound - An analyte identified based on a match with the instrument software's mass
spectral library. A calibration standard has not been analyzed to confirm the compound's identification or the
estimated concentration reported.
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 5 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2 C215303-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 16:37
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT0 CHM
MD No: BLT0 CHM
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10 12/12/21(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U1319-77-3
25 12/12/211,1-Biphenyl ug/L 12/15/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12092-52-4
5.0 12/12/211,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U95-94-3
2.0 12/12/211,4-Dioxane ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B2.0 U123-91-1
250 12/12/211-Methylnaphthalene ug/L 12/16/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B56090-12-0
5.0 12/12/212,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U58-90-2
5.0 12/12/212,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U95-95-4
5.0 12/12/212,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U88-06-2
5.0 12/12/212,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U120-83-2
5.0 12/12/212,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U105-67-9
10 12/12/212,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U51-28-5
5.0 12/12/212,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U121-14-2
5.0 12/12/212,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U606-20-2
5.0 12/12/212-Chloronaphthalene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U91-58-7
5.0 12/12/212-Chlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U95-57-8
10 12/12/212-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U534-52-1
250 12/12/212-Methylnaphthalene ug/L 12/16/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B110091-57-6
10 12/12/212-Methylphenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U95-48-7
5.0 12/12/212-Nitroaniline ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U88-74-4
5.0 12/12/212-Nitrophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U88-75-5
10 12/12/213,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U91-94-1
10 12/12/213-Nitroaniline ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U99-09-2
5.0 12/12/214-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U101-55-3
5.0 12/12/214-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U59-50-7
10 12/12/214-Chloroaniline ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U106-47-8
5.0 12/12/214-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U7005-72-3
10 12/12/214-Nitroaniline ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U100-01-6
10 12/12/214-Nitrophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U100-02-7
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 6 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2 C215303-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 16:37
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT0 CHM
MD No: BLT0 CHM
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
250 12/12/21Acenaphtheneug/L 12/16/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B52083-32-9
5.0 12/12/21Acenaphthyleneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U208-96-8
10 12/12/21Acetophenoneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B3.8 J, CLP0198-86-2
5.0 12/12/21Anthraceneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B1.9 J, CLP01120-12-7
10 12/12/21Atrazineug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U1912-24-9
10 12/12/21Benzaldehydeug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U, J, CLP16,
QC-3
100-52-7
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U56-55-3
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U50-32-8
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U205-99-2
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U191-24-2
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U207-08-9
5.0 12/12/21Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U85-68-7
10 12/12/21Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U108-60-1
5.0 12/12/21Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U111-91-1
10 12/12/21bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U111-44-4
5.0 12/12/21Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U117-81-7
10 12/12/21Caprolactamug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U105-60-2
10 12/12/21Carbazoleug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B11086-74-8
5.0 12/12/21Chryseneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U218-01-9
5.0 12/12/21Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U53-70-3
25 12/12/21Dibenzofuranug/L 12/15/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B290132-64-9
5.0 12/12/21Diethyl phthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U84-66-2
5.0 12/12/21Dimethyl phthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U131-11-3
5.0 12/12/21Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U84-74-2
10 12/12/21Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U117-84-0
5.0 12/12/21Fluorantheneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10206-44-0
25 12/12/21Fluoreneug/L 12/15/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B20086-73-7
5.0 12/12/21Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U118-74-1
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 7 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2 C215303-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 16:37
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT0 CHM
MD No: BLT0 CHM
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
5.0 12/12/21Hexachlorobutadieneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U87-68-3
10 12/12/21Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U77-47-4
5.0 12/12/21Hexachloroethaneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U67-72-1
5.0 12/12/21Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U193-39-5
5.0 12/12/21Isophoroneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U78-59-1
250 12/12/21Naphthaleneug/L 12/16/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B380091-20-3
5.0 12/12/21Nitrobenzeneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U98-95-3
5.0 12/12/21n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U621-64-7
5.0 12/12/21n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U122-39-4
10 12/12/21Pentachlorophenolug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U87-86-5
25 12/12/21Phenanthreneug/L 12/15/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B20085-01-8
10 12/12/21Phenolug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U108-95-2
5.0 12/12/21Pyreneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B4.2 J, CLP01129-00-0
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L30[1,1-Biphenyl]-4-carboxaldehyde NJ, CLP153218-36-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L601(2H)-Acenaphthylenone NJ, CLP152235-15-6
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L101(3H)-Isobenzofuranone NJ, CLP1587-41-2
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L101,1-Biphenyl, 4-methyl-NJ, CLP15644-08-6
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L201-Isopropenylnaphthalene NJ, CLP151855-47-6
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L91-Naphthalenecarboxylic acid NJ, CLP1586-55-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L101-Naphthalenemethanol NJ, CLP154780-79-4
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L102-Acetylbenzoic acid NJ, CLP15577-56-0
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L104,6,8-Trimethylazulene NJ, CLP15941-81-1
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L104H-Cyclopenta[def]phenanthrene NJ, CLP15203-64-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L109,10-Anthracenedione NJ, CLP1584-65-1
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L309H-Fluoren-9-one NJ, CLP15486-25-9
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L10Benzene, [1-(2,4-cyclopentadien-1-NJ, CLP152320-32-3
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L20Benzene, 1,2,3-trimethyl-NJ, CLP15526-73-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L10Benzene, 1-ethyl-3-methyl-NJ, CLP15620-14-4
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 8 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-2 C215303-01
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 16:37
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT0 CHM
MD No: BLT0 CHM
Station ID:MW-2
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L40Dibenzofuran, 4-methyl-NJ, CLP157320-53-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L20DibenzothiopheneNJ, CLP15132-65-0
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L9FenchoneNJ, CLP151195-79-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L8FurfuralNJ, CLP1598-01-1
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L20Heptanoic acid NJ, CLP15111-14-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L40IndaneNJ, CLP15496-11-7
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L30MesityleneNJ, CLP15108-67-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L20Naphthalene, 1,3-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15575-41-7
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L70Naphthalene, 1,6-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15575-43-9
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L6Naphthalene, 1,7-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15575-37-1
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L70Naphthalene, 2,3-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15581-40-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L50Naphthalene, 2-ethyl-NJ, CLP15939-27-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L20NordiphenamidNJ, CLP15954-21-2
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L60p-Cymene NJ, CLP1599-87-6
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 9 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57 C215303-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 15:22
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT1 CHM
MD No: BLT1 CHM
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10 12/12/21(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U1319-77-3
25 12/12/211,1-Biphenyl ug/L 12/15/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B18092-52-4
5.0 12/12/211,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U95-94-3
2.0 12/12/211,4-Dioxane ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B2.0 U123-91-1
25 12/12/211-Methylnaphthalene ug/L 12/15/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B33090-12-0
5.0 12/12/212,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U58-90-2
5.0 12/12/212,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U95-95-4
5.0 12/12/212,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U88-06-2
5.0 12/12/212,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U120-83-2
5.0 12/12/212,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U105-67-9
10 12/12/212,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U51-28-5
5.0 12/12/212,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U121-14-2
5.0 12/12/212,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U606-20-2
5.0 12/12/212-Chloronaphthalene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U91-58-7
5.0 12/12/212-Chlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U95-57-8
10 12/12/212-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U534-52-1
250 12/12/212-Methylnaphthalene ug/L 12/16/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B73091-57-6
10 12/12/212-Methylphenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U95-48-7
5.0 12/12/212-Nitroaniline ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U88-74-4
5.0 12/12/212-Nitrophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U88-75-5
10 12/12/213,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U91-94-1
10 12/12/213-Nitroaniline ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U99-09-2
5.0 12/12/214-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U101-55-3
5.0 12/12/214-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U59-50-7
10 12/12/214-Chloroaniline ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U106-47-8
5.0 12/12/214-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U7005-72-3
10 12/12/214-Nitroaniline ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U100-01-6
10 12/12/214-Nitrophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U100-02-7
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 10 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57 C215303-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 15:22
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT1 CHM
MD No: BLT1 CHM
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
5.0 12/12/21Acenaphtheneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B2783-32-9
5.0 12/12/21Acenaphthyleneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U208-96-8
10 12/12/21Acetophenoneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B6.1 J, CLP0198-86-2
5.0 12/12/21Anthraceneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U120-12-7
10 12/12/21Atrazineug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U1912-24-9
10 12/12/21Benzaldehydeug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U, J, CLP16,
QC-3
100-52-7
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U56-55-3
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U50-32-8
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U205-99-2
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U191-24-2
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U207-08-9
5.0 12/12/21Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U85-68-7
10 12/12/21Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U108-60-1
5.0 12/12/21Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U111-91-1
10 12/12/21bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U111-44-4
5.0 12/12/21Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U117-81-7
10 12/12/21Caprolactamug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U105-60-2
10 12/12/21Carbazoleug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B1886-74-8
5.0 12/12/21Chryseneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U218-01-9
5.0 12/12/21Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U53-70-3
25 12/12/21Dibenzofuranug/L 12/15/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B290132-64-9
5.0 12/12/21Diethyl phthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U84-66-2
5.0 12/12/21Dimethyl phthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U131-11-3
5.0 12/12/21Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U84-74-2
10 12/12/21Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U117-84-0
5.0 12/12/21Fluorantheneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U206-44-0
5.0 12/12/21Fluoreneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B2186-73-7
5.0 12/12/21Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U118-74-1
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 11 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57 C215303-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 15:22
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT1 CHM
MD No: BLT1 CHM
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
5.0 12/12/21Hexachlorobutadieneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U87-68-3
10 12/12/21Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U77-47-4
5.0 12/12/21Hexachloroethaneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U67-72-1
5.0 12/12/21Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U193-39-5
5.0 12/12/21Isophoroneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U78-59-1
1300 12/12/21Naphthaleneug/L 12/17/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B750091-20-3
5.0 12/12/21Nitrobenzeneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U98-95-3
5.0 12/12/21n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U621-64-7
5.0 12/12/21n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U122-39-4
10 12/12/21Pentachlorophenolug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U87-86-5
5.0 12/12/21Phenanthreneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B2285-01-8
10 12/12/21Phenolug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U108-95-2
5.0 12/12/21Pyreneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U129-00-0
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L81,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, mono NJ, CLP15131-70-4
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L401-Acenaphthenol NJ, CLP156306-07-6
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L51-Naphthalenol, 2-amino-NJ, CLP15606-41-7
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L82(1H)-Quinolinone NJ, CLP1559-31-4
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L42(1H)-Quinolinone, 4-methyl-NJ, CLP15607-66-9
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L62-Naphthalenecarboxylic acid NJ, CLP1593-09-4
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L44-Amino-1-naphthol NJ, CLP152834-90-4
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L66(5H)-Phenanthridinone NJ, CLP151015-89-0
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L108-Methylquinolin-2(1H)-one NJ, CLP151000502-93-2
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L709H-Fluoren-9-one NJ, CLP15486-25-9
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L30Benzene, 1,2,3-trimethyl-NJ, CLP15526-73-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L10Benzene, 1,3-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15108-38-3
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L30Benzene, 1-ethyl-3-methyl-NJ, CLP15620-14-4
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L10Benzene, 4-ethyl-1,2-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15934-80-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L10Dibenzofuran, 4-methyl-NJ, CLP157320-53-8
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 12 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-57 C215303-03
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 15:22
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT1 CHM
MD No: BLT1 CHM
Station ID:MW-57
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L10Dibenzothiophene sulfone NJ, CLP151016-05-3
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L10EthylbenzeneNJ, CLP15100-41-4
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L20FenchoneNJ, CLP151195-79-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L200IndaneNJ, CLP15496-11-7
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L80MesityleneNJ, CLP15108-67-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L30Naphthalene, 1,6-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15575-43-9
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L20Naphthalene, 1-ethyl-NJ, CLP151127-76-0
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L20Naphthalene, 2,3-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15581-40-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L20Naphthalic anhydride NJ, CLP1581-84-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L50o-Cymene NJ, CLP15527-84-4
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L4PhenanthridineNJ, CLP15229-87-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L30p-Xylene NJ, CLP15106-42-3
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L10Quinoline, 5-methyl-NJ, CLP157661-55-4
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L6XanthoneNJ, CLP1590-47-1
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 13 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58 C215303-05
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 16:26
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT2 CHM
MD No: BLT2 CHM
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10 12/12/21(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U1319-77-3
50 12/12/211,1-Biphenyl ug/L 12/15/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B14092-52-4
5.0 12/12/211,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U95-94-3
2.0 12/12/211,4-Dioxane ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B2.0 U123-91-1
50 12/12/211-Methylnaphthalene ug/L 12/15/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B38090-12-0
5.0 12/12/212,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U58-90-2
5.0 12/12/212,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U95-95-4
5.0 12/12/212,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U88-06-2
5.0 12/12/212,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U120-83-2
5.0 12/12/212,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U105-67-9
10 12/12/212,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U51-28-5
5.0 12/12/212,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U121-14-2
5.0 12/12/212,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U606-20-2
5.0 12/12/212-Chloronaphthalene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U91-58-7
5.0 12/12/212-Chlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U95-57-8
10 12/12/212-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U534-52-1
100 12/12/212-Methylnaphthalene ug/L 12/16/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B100091-57-6
10 12/12/212-Methylphenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U95-48-7
5.0 12/12/212-Nitroaniline ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U88-74-4
5.0 12/12/212-Nitrophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U88-75-5
10 12/12/213,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U91-94-1
10 12/12/213-Nitroaniline ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U99-09-2
5.0 12/12/214-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U101-55-3
5.0 12/12/214-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U59-50-7
10 12/12/214-Chloroaniline ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U106-47-8
5.0 12/12/214-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U7005-72-3
10 12/12/214-Nitroaniline ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U100-01-6
10 12/12/214-Nitrophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U100-02-7
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 14 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58 C215303-05
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 16:26
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT2 CHM
MD No: BLT2 CHM
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
50 12/12/21Acenaphtheneug/L 12/15/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B46083-32-9
5.0 12/12/21Acenaphthyleneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B13208-96-8
10 12/12/21Acetophenoneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U98-86-2
5.0 12/12/21Anthraceneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B2.3 J, CLP01120-12-7
10 12/12/21Atrazineug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U1912-24-9
10 12/12/21Benzaldehydeug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U, J, CLP16,
QC-3
100-52-7
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U56-55-3
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U50-32-8
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U205-99-2
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U191-24-2
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U207-08-9
5.0 12/12/21Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U85-68-7
10 12/12/21Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U108-60-1
5.0 12/12/21Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U111-91-1
10 12/12/21bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U111-44-4
5.0 12/12/21Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U117-81-7
10 12/12/21Caprolactamug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U105-60-2
10 12/12/21Carbazoleug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B13086-74-8
5.0 12/12/21Chryseneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U218-01-9
5.0 12/12/21Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U53-70-3
50 12/12/21Dibenzofuranug/L 12/15/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B380132-64-9
5.0 12/12/21Diethyl phthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U84-66-2
5.0 12/12/21Dimethyl phthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U131-11-3
5.0 12/12/21Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U84-74-2
10 12/12/21Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U117-84-0
5.0 12/12/21Fluorantheneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B11206-44-0
50 12/12/21Fluoreneug/L 12/15/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B16086-73-7
5.0 12/12/21Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U118-74-1
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 15 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58 C215303-05
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 16:26
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT2 CHM
MD No: BLT2 CHM
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
5.0 12/12/21Hexachlorobutadieneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U87-68-3
10 12/12/21Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U77-47-4
5.0 12/12/21Hexachloroethaneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U67-72-1
5.0 12/12/21Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U193-39-5
5.0 12/12/21Isophoroneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U78-59-1
500 12/12/21Naphthaleneug/L 12/16/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B760091-20-3
5.0 12/12/21Nitrobenzeneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U98-95-3
5.0 12/12/21n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U621-64-7
5.0 12/12/21n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U122-39-4
10 12/12/21Pentachlorophenolug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U87-86-5
50 12/12/21Phenanthreneug/L 12/15/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B18085-01-8
10 12/12/21Phenolug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B1.4 J, CLP01108-95-2
5.0 12/12/21Pyreneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.1129-00-0
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L101,1-Biphenyl, 2-methyl-NJ, CLP15643-58-3
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L601-Acenaphthenol NJ, CLP156306-07-6
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L81H,3H-Naphtho[1,8-cd]pyran-1-one NJ, CLP15518-86-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L71-Isopropenylnaphthalene NJ, CLP151855-47-6
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L202,4,6-Cycloheptatrien-1-one, 2-phe NJ, CLP1514562-09-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L103-Nitrocarbazole NJ, CLP153077-85-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L68-Hydroxyquinoline NJ, CLP15148-24-3
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L79,10-Anthracenedione NJ, CLP1584-65-1
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L209H-Fluoren-3-ol NJ, CLP156344-67-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L99H-Fluoren-9-ol NJ, CLP151689-64-1
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L509H-Fluoren-9-one NJ, CLP15486-25-9
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L6Benzene, [1-(2,4-cyclopentadien-1-NJ, CLP152320-32-3
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L20Benzene, 1,2,3-trimethyl-NJ, CLP15526-73-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L30Benzene, 1,2,4-trimethyl-NJ, CLP1595-63-6
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L9Benzene, 1-ethyl-2,4-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15874-41-9
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 16 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-58 C215303-05
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 16:26
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT2 CHM
MD No: BLT2 CHM
Station ID:MW-58
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L60Benzene, 1-ethyl-2-methyl-NJ, CLP15611-14-3
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L80Benzene, 1-propynyl-NJ, CLP15673-32-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L30Benzofuran, 2-methyl-NJ, CLP154265-25-2
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L10DibenzothiopheneNJ, CLP15132-65-0
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L8DiphenylmethaneNJ, CLP15101-81-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L9d-Limonene NJ, CLP155989-27-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L10FenchoneNJ, CLP151195-79-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L200IndaneNJ, CLP15496-11-7
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L70Naphthalene, 1,3-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15575-41-7
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L6Naphthalene, 1,6-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15575-43-9
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L70Naphthalene, 1,7-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15575-37-1
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L20Naphthalene, 2,6-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15581-42-0
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L40Naphthalene, 2-ethyl-NJ, CLP15939-27-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L40Naphthalic anhydride NJ, CLP1581-84-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L6Quinoline, 4-methyl-NJ, CLP15491-35-0
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 17 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6 C215303-07
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 14:18
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT3 CHM
MD No: BLT3 CHM
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
10 12/12/21(3-and/or 4-)Methylphenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U1319-77-3
50 12/12/211,1-Biphenyl ug/L 12/16/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B11092-52-4
5.0 12/12/211,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U, J, QS-395-94-3
2.0 12/12/211,4-Dioxane ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B2.0 U123-91-1
50 12/12/211-Methylnaphthalene ug/L 12/16/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B37090-12-0
5.0 12/12/212,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U, J, QS-358-90-2
5.0 12/12/212,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U, J, QS-395-95-4
5.0 12/12/212,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U, J, QS-388-06-2
5.0 12/12/212,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U, J, QS-3120-83-2
5.0 12/12/212,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U105-67-9
10 12/12/212,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U51-28-5
5.0 12/12/212,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U121-14-2
5.0 12/12/212,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U606-20-2
5.0 12/12/212-Chloronaphthalene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U91-58-7
5.0 12/12/212-Chlorophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U95-57-8
10 12/12/212-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U534-52-1
50 12/12/212-Methylnaphthalene ug/L 12/16/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B80091-57-6
10 12/12/212-Methylphenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U95-48-7
5.0 12/12/212-Nitroaniline ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U88-74-4
5.0 12/12/212-Nitrophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U88-75-5
10 12/12/213,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U91-94-1
10 12/12/213-Nitroaniline ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U99-09-2
5.0 12/12/214-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U101-55-3
5.0 12/12/214-Chloro-3-methylphenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U, J, QS-359-50-7
10 12/12/214-Chloroaniline ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U106-47-8
5.0 12/12/214-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U7005-72-3
10 12/12/214-Nitroaniline ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U100-01-6
10 12/12/214-Nitrophenol ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U100-02-7
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 18 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6 C215303-07
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 14:18
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT3 CHM
MD No: BLT3 CHM
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
50 12/12/21Acenaphtheneug/L 12/16/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B21083-32-9
5.0 12/12/21Acenaphthyleneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12208-96-8
10 12/12/21Acetophenoneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B2.6 J, CLP0198-86-2
5.0 12/12/21Anthraceneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B7.2120-12-7
10 12/12/21Atrazineug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U1912-24-9
10 12/12/21Benzaldehydeug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U, J, CLP16,
QC-3
100-52-7
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U56-55-3
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U50-32-8
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(b)fluoranthene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U205-99-2
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U191-24-2
5.0 12/12/21Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U207-08-9
5.0 12/12/21Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U85-68-7
10 12/12/21Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl) ether ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U108-60-1
5.0 12/12/21Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U111-91-1
10 12/12/21bis(2-Chloroethyl) Ether ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U111-44-4
5.0 12/12/21Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U117-81-7
10 12/12/21Caprolactamug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U105-60-2
100 12/12/21Carbazoleug/L 12/16/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B20086-74-8
5.0 12/12/21Chryseneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U218-01-9
5.0 12/12/21Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U53-70-3
50 12/12/21Dibenzofuranug/L 12/16/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B240132-64-9
5.0 12/12/21Diethyl phthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U84-66-2
5.0 12/12/21Dimethyl phthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U131-11-3
5.0 12/12/21Di-n-butylphthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U84-74-2
10 12/12/21Di-n-octylphthalate ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U117-84-0
5.0 12/12/21Fluorantheneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B8.8206-44-0
50 12/12/21Fluoreneug/L 12/16/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B14086-73-7
5.0 12/12/21Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U118-74-1
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 19 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6 C215303-07
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 14:18
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT3 CHM
MD No: BLT3 CHM
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
5.0 12/12/21Hexachlorobutadieneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U, J, QS-387-68-3
10 12/12/21Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP)ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U77-47-4
5.0 12/12/21Hexachloroethaneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U67-72-1
5.0 12/12/21Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U193-39-5
5.0 12/12/21Isophoroneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U78-59-1
1300 12/12/21Naphthaleneug/L 12/17/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B1400091-20-3
5.0 12/12/21Nitrobenzeneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U98-95-3
5.0 12/12/21n-Nitroso di-n-Propylamine ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U621-64-7
5.0 12/12/21n-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B5.0 U122-39-4
10 12/12/21Pentachlorophenolug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U, J, QS-387-86-5
50 12/12/21Phenanthreneug/L 12/16/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10085-01-8
10 12/12/21Phenolug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B10U108-95-2
5.0 12/12/21Pyreneug/L 12/14/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B4.7 J, CLP01129-00-0
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L20[1,1-Biphenyl]-4-carboxaldehyde NJ, CLP153218-36-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L801(2H)-Isoquinolinone NJ, CLP15491-30-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L1001-Acenaphthenol NJ, CLP156306-07-6
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L302-Propanol, 1-(2-methoxy-1-methyle NJ, CLP1520324-32-7
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L702-Propanol, 1-butoxy-NJ, CLP155131-66-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L203-Acridinol NJ, CLP157132-70-9
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L109,10-Anthracenedione NJ, CLP1584-65-1
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L409H-Fluoren-9-one NJ, CLP15486-25-9
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L40Benzene, 1,2,3-trimethyl-NJ, CLP15526-73-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L50Benzene, 1,3-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15108-38-3
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L40Benzene, 1-ethyl-2-methyl-NJ, CLP15611-14-3
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L20Benzenepropanal, 2-oxo-NJ, CLP1556485-04-2
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L10BenzofuranNJ, CLP15271-89-6
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L70Benzofuran, 2-methyl-NJ, CLP154265-25-2
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L20DibenzothiopheneNJ, CLP15132-65-0
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 20 of 21
D.A.R.T. Id: 22-0052
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4 Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division
980 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2700
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote - Reported by Jeffrey Wilmoth
Semi Volatile Organics
Sample ID:Lab ID: MW-6 C215303-07
Matrix:Groundwater
Date Collected:12/7/21 14:18
Project: 22-0052, Holcomb Creosote Contract Lab Case: 49842
D No: BLT3 CHM
MD No: BLT3 CHM
Station ID:MW-6
CAS
Number Analyte Results Qualifiers Units MRL Prepared Analyzed Method
Tentatively Identified Compounds:
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L60Dipropylene glycol (isomer 3)NJ, CLP151000506-25-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L20d-Limonene NJ, CLP155989-27-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L30EthylbenzeneNJ, CLP15100-41-4
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L30FenchoneNJ, CLP151195-79-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L400IndaneNJ, CLP15496-11-7
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L1000IndeneNJ, CLP1595-13-6
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L100MesityleneNJ, CLP15108-67-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L20Naphthalene, 1,3-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15575-41-7
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L30Naphthalene, 1,7-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15575-37-1
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L50Naphthalene, 2,3-dimethyl-NJ, CLP15581-40-8
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L40Naphthalene, 2-ethyl-NJ, CLP15939-27-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L40Naphthalic anhydride NJ, CLP1581-84-5
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L80o-Xylene NJ, CLP1595-47-6
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L80p-Cymene NJ, CLP1599-87-6
12/12/21 CLP SFAM01.1 B12/14/21ug/L10Quinoline, 4-methyl-NJ, CLP15491-35-0
1/28/22 14:23C215303 SVOA FINAL 01 28 22 1423Page 21 of 21