Final EMP_Hoke St Passage Home_DEQ signed

NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in the
North Carolina Brownfields Redevelopment Section at the direction of a Brownfields project
manager.
The EMP is a standard requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an effort to
avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory -compliant
decision -making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP, including
contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have questions.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development -related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the EMP to be valid for use, it must be
completed, reviewed by the Section, signed by all parties working on the project, and approved
by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of the EMP could
jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a recorded agreement, be cause for a reopener.
The EMP is valid only for the scope of work described herein and must be updated to be for
new phases of redevelopment or after significant changes in applicable regulatory guidance.
Risk characterization of a Brownfields Property to DEQ's written satisfaction is required prior
to EMP approval.
Voluntary Metrics Tab
The NC Brownfields Redevelopment Section updates estimated capital investment (from the
Brownfields Property Application) and estimated jobs created (from the Brownfields Agreement)
whenever possible. As a voluntary measure, you may opt to complete the below information for
capital investment and jobs created as estimated by your final redevelopment plans for the
Brownfields Property:
1. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: $40M for low-income, age -
restricted multifamily apartment complex. Further detail to be provided in a future
EMP (see Redevelopment Plans Section)
2. Estimated jobs created:
a. Construction Jobs: To be provided in a future EMP (see Redevelopment Plans
Section)
b. Full Time Post -Redevelopment Jobs: To be provided in a future EMP (see
Redevelopment Plans Section)
EMP Version 3, March 2023

Table of Contents
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION.................................................................. 1
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN....................................................................................................
1
GENERAL INFORMATION........................................................................................................................
4
COMMUNICATIONS................................................................................................................................
4
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION
..................................................... 5
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS........................................................................................................................
5
CONTAMINATED MEDIA.........................................................................................................................
7
PART1. SOIL........................................................................................................................................
8
PART 2. GROUNDWATER..................................................................................................................
17
PART 3. SURFACE WATER..................................................................................................................
19
PART 4. SEDIMENT............................................................................................................................
19
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR.........................................................................................................................
20
PART 6. INDOOR AIR.........................................................................................................................
20
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM.............................................................................................
21
CONTINGENCY PLAN.............................................................................................................................
21
POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING.....................................................................................................
23
APPROVAL SIGNATURES.......................................................................................................................
24
2
EMP Version 3, March 2023

So that the EMP provides value in protecting Brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing all of the following is premature and may be
returned without comment.
® Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields' objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields project manager.
® Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields project manager.
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant and
applicable to the proposed redevelopment:
® A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not, conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.
❑ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.
❑ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.
❑ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
onsite after construction grading.
® Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e., demolition, etc.). We will provide the
demolition permit we obtained.
® A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction (Note:
for demolition only at this time).
® Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e., soil, groundwater, soil gas, etc.)
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
® Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
❑ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.
❑ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
Brownfields approval.
❑ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
3
EMP Version 3, March 2023

detailing the type of material proposed for import to the Brownfields Property.
❑ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Redevelopment Section Guidelines.
❑ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export and
sampling data from those areas.
❑ If a Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) is required by the Brownfields
Redevelopment Section, the VIMS plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Date: 9/28/2023 Revision Date (if applicable): Click or tap to enter a date.
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Hoke Street Passage Home
Brownfields Project Number: 21007-17-092
Brownfields Property Address: 500 and 506 Hoke Street; 1402 and 1412 Garner Road, Raleigh, Wake
County, North Carolina. This Environmental Management Plan has been prepared for building
demolition (including asbestos abatement) and underground storage tank (UST) removal at the 1402
Garner Road parcel. Work is being funded via grant from the City of Raleigh pursuant to the American
Rescue Plan Act of 2021 and the City's Community Health Initiative Capital Projects.
Brownfields Property Area (acres): 3.95 acres
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ....................... ❑ Yes M No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit............ ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, enter Permit No.: UICK or tap here to enter text.
COMMUNICATIONS
A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities in an area that is
prominently accessible to site workers. NOTE, THE EMP DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE -SPECIFIC
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.
Prospective Developer (PD): Hoke Street PH Redevelopment, LLC & Passage Home, Inc.
Contact Person: Steve Vebber, Action CEO
Phone Numbers: Office: Click or taD hereto enter text. Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
4
EMP Version 3, March 2023

Contractor for PD: Ammons Resource Group, Inc. (UST removal contractor)
Contact Person: Fred Ammons (Ammons Resource Group, Inc.)
Phone Numbers: Office: ­ —'- ^- *ap here +^ --ter text. Mobile: [phone] (Ammons)
Email: [e-mail]
Environmental Consultant: Aptus Management, PLLC; Hart & Hickman, PC
Contact Person: John Gallagher (Aptus Management, PLLC)
Phone Numbers: Office: .ip here to enter text. Mobile: [phone] (John Gallagher)
Email: [e-mail]
Brownfields Redevelopment Section Project Manager: Aditi Posek
Phone Numbers: Office: Click or tap here =_nter text Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
Click or tap here to enter text.
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION
Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields project manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsitetask:
On -site assessment or remedial activities: .................................................... 10 days Prior
Construction or grading start: .......................................................................... 10 days Prior
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ................................................................................ Within 48 hours
IK
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones): ................................... Within 48 hours
Installation of mitigation systems: ................................................................ 10 days Prior ❑
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ................................................................................. Within 30 days
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
®Residential ❑Townhomes (Prior written DEQ approval REQUIRED regardless of ownership
structure) ❑Recreational ❑Institutional ❑Commercial ❑Office ❑Retail ❑ Industrial
®Other specify:
Apartment complex and parking
5
EMP Version 3, March 2023

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth -moving activities
at the site:
® Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
® Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
® Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
Redevelopment plans for the Hoke Street Property include combining the four parcels, razing the
existing buildings, and construction of a four-story senior living apartment building with
associated parking, access drives, and stormwater control measures. However, as previously
noted, this EMP is for building demolition and UST removal solely at the 1402 Garner Road parcel
The UST removal will be conducted in accordance with applicable UST Section guidance, with the
exception that MADEP analyses will not be conducted on site samples. The work is being paid for
via a one-year grant from the City of Raleigh pursuant to the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021
and the City's Community Health Initiative Capital Projects.
At least two heating oil USTs remain at the 1402 Garner Road parcel. Specifically, the USTs are
located south of the former convenience store building (Suspect UST #2) and west of the former
automotive repair building (Suspect UST #3) as shown in Figure 2. The tank dimensions could
range from approximately 5 to 10 ft long and about 4 ft wide, with capacities ranging from 500 to
1,000 gallons. Additionally, tank ventilation pipes, a fuel dispenser concrete island, and utility
and/or product piping were observed in the southern and eastern portions of the parcel. As such,
it is possible that a UST is or was present there (i.e., Suspect UST #1, Figure 2). H&H was unable to
locate records pertaining to the three suspect UST contents.
Once details associated with full redevelopment plans for the Brownfields property are available,
those plans will be provided to the DEQ Brownfields Program for review in a revised EMP. We
expect this will occur sometime in late 2024 to early 2025.
4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
® If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please provide
a copy of your demolition permit.
The building improvements at the 1412 Garner Rd parcel and the warehouse at 500 Hoke St were
demolished in early September 2023. A copy of the demo permit is provided with this EMP.
Building slabs remain and the demo work did not entail ground disturbance.
5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
S&EC requirements can be found at: https://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-and-land-
resources/erosion-and-sediment-control/erosion-and-sediment-control-laws-and-rules
6
EMP Version 3, March 2023

❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
The work entails just demolition of two small buildings and removal of USTs. The area ground
disturbance is below thresholds which would trigger stormwater S&EC measures.
❑ If ves, please check here to confirm that earth -work will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.
6) Which category of risk -based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
® Residential ❑ Non -Residential or Industrial/Commercial
7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 10/9/2023
This is the earliest anticipated start date for the UST removal work.
b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
Two to three weeks
c) Additional phases planned? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: No earlier than Q4 2024 to Q2 2025 for development of the apartment complex
Planned Activity:
Construction of the apartment complex.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: Click or tap to enter a date.
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Please fill out the sections below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas of
contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure overlaying new construction
onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Propert
Part 1. Soil: ® Yes
Part 2. Groundwater: .................................... ® Yes
Part 3. Surface Water: ❑ Yes
Part 4. Sediment: .......................................... ❑ Yes
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ......................................... ® Yes
7
EMP Version 3, March 2023
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown ® N/A
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown ® N/A
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown

Part 6. Sub -Slab Soil Vapor: .......................... ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Suspected ❑ Unknown
For the 500 Hoke St warehouse only not at 1412 Garner Rd
Part 7. Indoor Air: ......................................... ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Suspected ❑ Unknown
We have data only for the former 500 Hoke St warehouse only not at 1412 Garner Rd
2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.
PART 1. SOIL
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
Multiple environmental assessments have been conducted at the Brownfields Property. For the
1402 Garner Road portion, a site assessment, including soil testing, was conducted by Hart &
Hickman (Brownfields Assessment Report, February 16, 2023). Figures 3 and 4 show soil sample
locations and Tables 1 and 2 (attached) provide the analytical data from the H&H report. A
summary of the soil assessment results for the 1402 Garner Road parcel is provided below.
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Low levels of VOCs were detected above laboratory method detection limits in several soil
samples. However, no VOCs were detected above the Residential or Industrial/Commercial PSRGs,
including the samples collected adjacent to UST locations.
Semi -Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
Low levels of SVOCs, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, were detected in multiple soil
samples above laboratory method detection limits. Benzo(a)pyrene (up to 0.496 milligrams per
kilogram [mg/kg)), was detected above the Residential PSRG in soil samples SB-16, SB-22 and SB-
23. No other SVOCs were detected at above Residential or Industrial/Commercial PSRGs.
Matnlc
Naturally -occurring background levels of several metals were detected at concentrations above
laboratory method detection limits. However, only arsenic, hexavalent chromium and lead were
detected at concentrations above their respective Residential PSRGs.
Arsenic and total chromium were detected at concentrations below and/or within published and
site -specific background levels. Speciation of total chromium was performed to determine the
hexavalent chromium (Cr6+) concentrations in soil. Cr6+ was measured above the Residential
PSRG, but below the Industrial/Commercial PSRG. The Cr6+ found could be indicative of
background conditions due to natural speciation of chromium between its trivalent and
hexavalent valence states, and not associated with a release.
Lead was detected in samples SB-20 (445 mg/kg) and SB-23 (950 mg/kg) at concentrations above
the Residential PSRG, Industrial/Commercial PSRG (SB-23 only), and 20 times the hazardous
characteristic threshold concentration. Results of Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
(TCLP) analyses for SB-23 indicated lead at a concentration of 6.27 milligrams per liter (mg/L),
which is above the Federal Toxicity Characteristic Level of 5 mg/L (40 CFR Subpart C 261.24).
8
EMP Version 3, March 2023

As mentioned below, we will limit soil disturbance when we remove the USTs and minimize soil
removal from in and around the tank graves. All excavated soil will be removed and disposed
offsite.
Additional steps to minimize contact by future uses to impacted soils will be evaluated as part of
the future development plans for the site. This EMP is solely for the upcoming UST removal work.
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Up to approximately 6 ft bgs.
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
USTs will be removed in a manner to limit surface disturbance to approximately 50 square ft (sq
ft) or less. Otherwise, no other ground surface disturbance is planned.
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
Minimal soil disturbance is expected to remove the USTs. Excavation depth will be limited to the
base of the USTs, expected to be approximately 4-5 ft bgs.
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
Minimal (approximately 5 cubic yards [cy] or less) soil disturbance is expected to occur during the
removal of the USTs.
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
Up to approximately 5 cy.
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
Soil disturbed during UST removal will be disposed of offsite at Triangle Area Earth, a licensed
disposal facility, and will not be used as backfill for the UST excavation pits unless the soil is tested
and shown to be below residential screening levels. There will be no mass grading or other
ground disturbance associated with the UST removal work covered by this EMP.
Future ground disturbance, grading, and foundation work for the apartment complex will be
subject to a separate EMP.
PART 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminarydata available).
1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous Waste
Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ❑Yes ®No
❑ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
9
EMP Version 3, March 2023

❑ If yes, do the soils exceed the "Contained -Out" levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained -In Policy? ................................................. ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED -OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED -IN POLICY,THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE -USED ONSITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE? .................................... ® Yes ❑ No
® If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
❑ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Toxicity ick or tap here to enter text.
® TCLP results The results of the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
(TCLP) laboratory analyses indicated lead at a concentration of 6.27 mg/L in SB-
23, which exceeds the TCLP level of 5 mg/L defined in 40 CFR Subpart C 261.24.
Lead -impacted soil excavated from in and around the SB-23 sampling location
during the UST removal work will not be used as backfill.
® Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
Results of soil assessment indicated that lead in soil samples SB-20 (445
mg/kg) and SB-23 (950 mg/kg) at concentrations above the TCLP Rule of 20.
However, the results of TCLP analyses indicated that the leachate
concentration for soil sample SB-20 does not exceed toxicity characteristic
levels for lead.
❑ If no, explain rationale:
d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAYNOT BE RE -USED ONSITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH
DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
© Preliminary Health -Based Residential SRGs
❑ Preliminary Health -Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
® Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
10
EMP Version 3, March 2023

❑ Site -specific risk -based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Click UI Ld P I ICI C LV CI ILCI LUAL.
Additional comments:
LaN I I enter text.
3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property boundary, please
check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of same.
Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
We will be removing USTs and any soil we disturb from the tank graves will be removed and disposed
offsite and not reused. As needed, clean fill from Wake Stone Knightdale or 57 stone will be used as
backfill in the tank graves.
❑ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields project manager.
❑ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil onsite map to
Brownfields project manager once known.
❑ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
Click or t7~ ""re to enter tee
❑ Manage soil under impervious cap ❑ or clean fill
El Describe cap or fill:
Click or tap here to ­__ —
❑ Confer with NC BF project manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re -recorded if
actions are Post -Recordation).
❑ GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
❑ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:
Click or tap here to enter text.
4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
® Check to confirm that management of fugitive dust from site activities will be handled in
accordance with applicable local, state, and federal requirements. The demolition contractor will
consider conditions such as wind speed and direction, and moisture content of soil during
demolition and UST removal to minimize dust generation. In the unlikely event that contaminated
soil requires excavation, contractors will implement dust control measures (e.g., controlled water
application, hydro -seeding, and/or mulch, stone, or plastic cover). Impacted soil will be managed as
described below.
Field screenine of site soil
At a minimum, contractors shall be made aware of protocols should impacted soils (e.g. staining,
unusual odors, fill materials) be identified.
11
EMP Version 3, March 2023

Describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting field
screening:
During UST removal work, the contractors will observe for evidence of potential impacted soil,
such as a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or disposed materials (e.g., chemicals,
tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be noted, the contractor will contact the project
environmental professional. If the project environmental professional confirms that the material
may be impacted, the following procedures will be implemented. In addition, the environmental
professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within two business days.
Soil sample collection
® Yes
❑ Not anticipated - In order to avoid delays in construction, a plan shall be in place for sampling
of suspect soils should they be encountered during redevelopment. If soil sample collection is not
anticipated but the need to do so is identified during redevelopment, notify the Brownfields
project manager of the anticipated sample and report dates for scheduling purposes.
Describe the sampling method (e.g., in -situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.) and confirm that all
procedures outlined in applicable DEQ guidance for assessment shall be followed Typically, at least
one representative sample (per 500 yd'for residential and 1,000 yd3 for commercial) consisting of a
3 to 5-point composite sample with grab sample for VOCs based on the highest PID reading is
required to determine soil management options:
Soil samples will be collected from the four sidewalls and base of the tank grave excavations prior
to backfilling. The samples will be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals, plus Cr6+.
This phase of the project will not entail mass grading or other planned significant ground
disturbance. We will be removing USTs and disposing of soil at Tringle Area Earth that we disturb
from the tank graves. Additional soil testing will be completed as may be necessary to meet
Triangle Area Earth's requirements.
Check applicable chemical analytes for soil samples:
® Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method
8260; Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA
List + Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter t.
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
® Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides):
TCLP for Pb if total Pd exceeds the RCRA 20X rule
® Check to confirm that by the owner's signature and the North Carolina Professional
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect soil
12
EMP Version 3, March 2023

sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the sealing
professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines and methodologies are
followed and reported to DEQ for determination and approval of soil placement prior to final
relocation.
If impacted soils above applicable PSRGs and/or site -specific risk thresholds are proposed to be
relocated on -site, prior to final placement on -site, the following shall be submitted for DEQ
review/approval
- Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the above referenced frequency and
following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum Requirements Checklist (Checklist) and in
accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of Contaminated Sites
(Guidelines)
Figure outlining planned soil placement and any future site features including
buildings/hardscape/open areas
A North Carolina PE/PG recommendation of placement
Options
Onsite Placement without
Onsite placement under 2 ft
Impacts
conditions
of cap or clean fill', 2
All Constituents below applicable
X
PSRGs
Constituents' below applicable
PSRGs; Metals below background
X
but above PSRGs
Constituents3 below applicable
PSRGs; Metals above Background
X
/PSRGs
Constituents above Applicable
X
PSRGs
1: Requires Prior Written DEQ Approval
2: VOC impacted soils above applicable PSRGs shall not be placed directly beneath building footprints
without prior written DEQ approval.
3: Constituents indicate any samples evaluated for other than metals.
® Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted in
accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion control,
prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing
contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as needed:
Click or tad, , , e to enter text
❑ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes below
(Check all thatapply):
This EMP is for UST removal work only. Future final grade sampling will be considered as part of the
future redevelopment of the site with an apartment complex.
❑ Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method
13
EMP Version 3, March 2023

8260; Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA
List + Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
— yap here t^ -ntPr text
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
l ICK or tap nere to enter text.
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides):
Click or tap here to enter text.
Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, indicate if a work
plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
l.11l.l� VI LGIP IICIC lV CIIICI ICA.
® If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale:
Final grade sampling will not be conducted as part of the UST removal work — but will be
considered in planning for development of the future apartment complex. This will be
addressed in a separate EMP for the site's redevelopment.
PART I.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL
NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM
THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION. According to the Brownfields IR 15, "Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written approval in
advance by the Brownfields Redevelopment Section), will safeguard the liability protections provided
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner."
Requirements for importing fill:
❑ Check to confirm that the import volumes outlined below have been confirmed based on
geotechnical evaluations.
1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ................................................ ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
In the event backfill material is needed to fill the UST graves; we would utilize 57 stone aggregate
of fill sourced from Wake Stone Knightdale.
3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range
of depths, list the range.)
Less than 10 ft to fill tank graves
14
EMP Version 3, March 2023

PRIOR TO SOIL PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, a Soil Import Request must be
submitted for DEQ Brownfields review and approval. The request shall consist of a data package
that details:
- Fill source location/history (Phase I if available, current aerials, etc.)
- Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the below frequency and
following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum Requirements Checklist (Checklist)
and in accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of Contaminated
Sites (Guidelines)
- A table comparing the import soil to existing site concentrations
- A PE/PG recommendation of import
- All relevant attachments listed in the Checklist
Soil Import Sampling Requirements:
Source
Sample Frequency
I Sample Analysis
Virgin Material from DEQ
None (Contact Brownfields project manager for list of pre-
Brownfields Pre -
approved Quarries
approved Quarry
DEQ Permitted Quarry
At least one
VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA
(Not Brownfields Pre-
representative sample
Metals, any site specific
approved)
from area of planned
COCs (e.g., pesticides,
import
PCBs, etc.)
Other NC DEQ
At least one
Brownfields Property
representative sample
VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA
per 1,000 yd3 consisting
Metals, any site specific
Off -site
of a 3-point composite
COCs (e.g., pesticides,
unpermitted/regulated
sample with grab sample
PCBs, etc.)
property
for VOCs based on the
highest PID reading
Bulk Landscape Material
from Commercial Vendor
No Sampling Required
(i.e. topsoil)
If other special considerations apply, discuss:
® Check to confirm that by the owner's signature and the North Carolina Professional
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect soil
sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the sealing
professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines are followed and reported in
the Soil Import Request for DEQ approval. Failure to meet these requirements could result in
resampling and/or failure to approve import.
PART I.C. SOIL EXPORT
NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
15
EMP Version 3, March 2023

BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION. Failure to obtain approval may violate a brownfields
agreement causing a reopener or jeopardizing eligibility in the Section, endangering liability
protections and making said action possibly subject to enforcement. Justifications provided
below must be approved by the Section in writing prior to completing transport activities. Refer
to Brownfields IR 15 for additional details.
1) If export from the Brownfields Property is anticipated, export soil must be sampled at a
frequency of one sample per 1,000 yd3 consisting of a 3-point composite sample with a
grab sample for VOCs based on the highest PID reading. Samples shall be analyzed at a
minimum for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals plus any site specific COCs.
PRIOR TO EXPORT FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, a Soil Export Request must be
submitted for DEQ Brownfields review and approval. The request shall consist of a Data
Package that details:
- Proposed Receiving Facility
- Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the above referenced
frequency and following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields
Redevelopment Section Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum
Requirements Checklist (Checklist) and in accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for
Assessment and Cleanup of Contaminated Sites (Guidelines)
- A table comparing the export soil to concentrations on the receiving site concentrations
including risk comparison (Note that calculated risk cannot be increased on the receiving
site)
- A North Carolina PE/PG recommendation of export
- Written approval from the receiving site property owner representative for export
- All relevant attachments listed in the Checklist
Soil Export Options
Options
Use as
Off -site disposal at
Off -site disposal
Off -site disposal at Subtitle
Impacts
Beneficial Fill
other Brownfields
at LCID/CD
D MSW/Permitted
Property2,6,'
Landfill', I
Landfarm4
All Constituents below
applicable PSRGs
X
X
X
X
Constituents5 below
applicable PSRGs; Metals
X
X
X
below background but
above PSRGs
Constituents5 below
applicable PSRGs; Metals
X
X
X
above Background /PSRGs
Constituents above
X
X
Applicable PSRGs
1: Requires Prior Written DEQ Approval
2: VOC impacted soils above applicable PSRGs shall not be placed directly beneath building footprints
without prior written DEQ approval.
3: Requires comparison to site specific metals concentrations.
4: Facility to determine if they can accept soil within their permit.
16
EMP Version 3, March 2023

5: Constituents indicate any samples evaluated for other than metals.
6: Requires written approval from receiving site property owner representative.
7. Site COCs must be in comparable concentrations to receiving site and not significantly raise risk of the
receiving site.
® Check to confirm that by the owner's signature and the North Carolina Professional
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect soil
sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the sealing
professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines are followed and reported in
the Soil Export Request for DEQ approval. Failure to meet these requirements could result in
resampling and/or failure to approve export.
If other special considerations apply, discuss:
Click or tap here to enter text.
PART 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
❑ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)
❑ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were
removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth
from which it was excavated.
❑ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants.
❑ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials or provide the results of this evaluation in the
Vapor Mitigation Plan. Note that if vapor mitigation is planned for site buildings, utility corridors
will need to be evaluated as part of mitigation designs:
Click or tap here to enter tex,
❑ If no, include rationale here:
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Unknown, details to be provided in the Vapor Mitigation Plan for site buildings
Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Not applicable for UST removal activities included in this EMP.
PART 2. GROUNDWATER
1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
Based upon groundwater assessment activities conducted at the 1402 Garner Road parcel,
groundwater is present at depths ranging from approximately 27 to 29 ft bgs.
17
EMP Version 3, March 2023

2) What is the maximum depth of soil disturbance onsite?
Depths of disturbance will extend to the base of the USTs, which is expected to be approximately
4-8 ft bgs.
3) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ❑onsite ❑offsite El both or El unknown sources?
Describe source(s):
Groundwater assessment activities conducted at the 1402 Garner Road parcel have indicated no
VOCs, SVOCs, or metals at concentrations above Title 15A NCAC 2L Groundwater Standards (2L
Standards).
4) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
Groundwater flow direction is to the south.
5) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities (e.g.,
footer/utility construction or helical pilings?)
❑Yes ®No
If yes, describe these activities:
In the event that groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if no is
checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewateringof
groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to
sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or sampling procedures).
While unlikely if groundwater is encountered, the contractor will contact the environmental
professional, who will update the DEQ Brownfields manager within two business days. Although
not anticipated, appropriate worker safety measures to eliminate contact with groundwater (i.e.,
movement of workers away from the area and/or the use of personal protection equipment
[PPE]) will be undertaken if groundwater gathers in an open excavation within an area
determined to be impacted (based on strong odor, unnatural color, sheen, etc.). The
accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent that time for dissipation
does not disrupt the construction schedule. Should the time needed for natural dissipation of
accumulated water be deemed to slow, the water will be tested for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA
metals and disposed of off -Site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not
impacted above Title 15A NCAC 2B Surface Water Standards and not considered listed hazardous
waste) in accordance with applicable City of Raleigh stormwater regulations.
If free -flowing groundwater can be reasonably captured, it will be pumped to lined and covered
roll -off containers or an aboveground tank prior to testing for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals.
The groundwater will then be disposed of off -Site (if impacted) or discharged to the storm sewer
(if not impacted above 2B Standards and not considered listed hazardous waste).
6) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property? ................. ❑Yes ®No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?.................................................................................................................. Dyes ❑ No
7) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
18
EMP Version 3, March 2023

❑ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Redevelopment Section's intent to allow proper abandonment of
well(s) as specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active
monitoring through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
❑ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
❑ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
® Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.
8) Please provide additional details as needed:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.
PART 3. SURFACE WATER
1) Is surface water present at the property? ❑ Yes ® No
2) If yes, attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities or as part of the final redevelopment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities,
or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of such events
(e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
If surface water run-off gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted
during construction, appropriate worker safety measures to eliminate contact with surface water
(i.e., movement of workers away from the area and/or the use of PPE) will be undertaken. The
accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent time for dissipation does
not disrupt the construction schedule. Should the time be needed for natural dissipation of
accumulated water be deemed inadequate, the water will be tested and disposed off -Site (if
impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above 2B Standards and
not considered listed hazardous waste) in accordance with applicable City of Raleigh regulations
for stormwater control.
PART 4. SEDIMENT
1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ❑ Yes ® No
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ® No
19
EMP Version 3, March 2023

4) Attach a map showing the location of known contaminated sediment at the property.
5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
Not applicable.
PARTS. SOIL VAPOR
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
Groundwater
Exterior Soil Vapor
Sub -Slab Soil Vapor
Residential
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Unknown
❑ Unknown
❑ Unknown
Commercial
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Unknown
❑ Unknown
❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the locations of all soil vapor samples including any soil vapor
contaminants that exceeds screening levels and overlays planned site development features.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is exterior soil vapor known to be contaminated?
Approximately 5 ft bgs
4) If applicable, at what depth(s) is sub -slab soil vapor known to be contaminated?
❑0-6 inches ❑Other, please describe:
Click or tap here to enter text.
5) Will workers encounter contaminated exterior or sub -slab soil vapor during planned
redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑X Unknown
In the event that apparent contaminated soil vapor is encountered (based on elevated PID
readings, unusual odors, etc.) during redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or
other subsurface work,) list activities for management of such contact, INCLUDING notification to
DEQ within 48 hours of identification of the issue for determination of additional requirements:
In the unlikely event impacted soil vapors are encountered during UST removal activities, the
worker breathing zone will be monitored continuously using a calibrated PID. If results indicate
further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as the use of industrial fans or
PPE) will be implemented.
Figure 4 and Table 5 provide vapor intrusion -related sampling results from the February 2023
Brownfields Assessment Report.
PART 6. INDOOR AIR
1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ® Yes ❑ No
(For the warehouse located at 500 Hoke St, but not the buildings which were located at 1402 Garner
20
EMP Version 3, March 2023

E
2) If applicable, attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site
screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk -based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown ® N/A
❑ If no, include rationale here:
Click or tap here to enter tex
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:
Click or tap here to enter text.
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM
1) Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
❑ Yes ®No ❑ Unknown
® If no or unknown, include rationale here as well as plans for pre -occupancy sampling, as
necessary:
This EMP is for removal of USTs only. No decisions are being made with respect to the need for a
VIMS in future improvements. Results of vapor intrusion assessment testing at the 1402 Garner
Road parcel indicated benzene was detected at a concentration above the Residential SGSL in one
soil gas sample. No other VOCs were detected at concentrations above Residential SGSLs in sub -
slab vapor or soil gas samples.
If yes, ❑ VIMS Plan Attached or ❑ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
Click or tap here to enter tex,
VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer and follow the DEQ
Brownfields Redevelopment Section's Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System Design Submittal
Requirements.
Note that approval of this EMP does not imply approval with any vapor intrusion mitigation land
use restrictions or requirements of the recorded or draft Brownfields Agreement and that
separate approval of mitigation measures will be required.
CONTINGENCY PLAN
In this section, please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown potential
new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon that
unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, orother waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields project manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.
Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site impacts,
21
EMP Version 3, March 2023

the DEQ Brownfields project manager will be notified, and a sampling plan will be prepared based
on the EMP requirements and site -specific factors. Samples will generally be collected to
document the location of the potential impacts.
Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
® Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260;
Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270; and_Metals RCRA List +
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
N VI LCIP I ICI C lV CI IICI MCA,
❑ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Click or tap here to enter text.
Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly encountered
issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
Underground Storage Tanks — Note that UST Section guidelines must be followed for sample
frequency during UST closure. Unless damage to onsite structures to remain as part of
redevelopment would occur, USTs shall be removed from the Brownfields Property:
If an additional UST(s) is encountered, the environmental professional will be consulted to
determine the appropriate course of action. In addition, the DEQ project manager will be informed.
The UST will be removed and disposed, and the area in the vicinity of the UST assessed for evidence
of a release. The sampling protocol will include analysis of soil samples for VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA
metals and Cr (VI) to allow for risk -based decision making. The other procedures outlined above for
the planned UST removal work will be followed.
Sub -Grade Feature/Pit:
If a sub -grade feature or pit is encountered, DEQ Brownfields will be notified, and the feature or pit
will be filled with soil or suitable fill. Where appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before
backfilling to prevent fluid accumulation. If the pit has waste in it, the waste may be set aside in a
secure area and will be sampled for waste disposal purposes for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, and TCLP
metals and disposed off -Site at a permitted facility or the waste will be managed in accordance with
the Managing On -Site Soil section outlined above in the EMP, whichever is most applicable based on
the type of waste present. If the pit must be removed and the observed waste characteristics
indicate the concrete may potentially be contaminated, the concrete will be sampled and analyzed
by methods specified by the disposal facility. Confirmatory soil samples below the pit (sidewalls and
base) will be collected.
Buried Waste Material — Note that if buried waste, non-native fill, or any obviously filled materials is
encountered, the DEQ Brownfields Redevelopment Section must be notified to determine if
investigation of landfill gases is required:
If excavation into buried wastes or impacted soils occurs, the contractor is instructed to stop work in
that location and notify the environmental consultant, who will then notify the DEQ Brownfields
22
EMP Version 3, March 2023

Program. The environmental consultant will review the materials and collect samples and/or
conduct soil gas monitoring. Confirmation sampling will be conducted at representative locations in
the base and the sidewalls of the excavation after the waste or impacted soil is removed. The
confirmation samples will be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals. Areas of suspected
contaminated soil that remain after excavation is complete above the DEQ Residential PSRGs will be
managed pursuant to this plan.
Re -Use of Impacted Soils Onsite:
Please refer to the description outlined in the Managing On -Site Soil section of the EMP above.
If unknown, impacted soil is identified onsite, management onsite can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
project manager approval prior to final placement onsite.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
® Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be due
by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of this
EMP (as agreed upon with the project manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final Redevelopment
Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of redevelopment. Based on the
estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary Report is anticipated to be
submitted on 1/31/2024
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment -related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed to
be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).
X❑ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site's Brownfields Agreement.
23
EMP Version 3, March 2023

APPROVAL SIGNATURES
Brownfields Project Number: 21007-17-092
Brownfields Project Name: Hoke Street Passage Home
S'7`ev� (/e66er
box SIGN 13X972K4-15XJJ65X
Prospective Developer: Hoke Street PH Redevelopment, LLC
Printed Name/Title/Company: Steve Vebber, Acting CEO
Consultant: Aptus Management, PLLC
Printed Name/Title/Company: John Gallagher, PE
PE/PG Professional License #: 024199
Firm PE/PG License #: P-1130
Brownfields PrAect Manager: Aditi Posek
24
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Date 9/28/2023
`►%tiltV IIfflr�
H GAR
O�Gss
r
Q4 rj9l,�
_ SEAL
0
024199
D4
Date 9/28/2023
Date 10/3/2023

Figure 1
NCBP Diagram for Temporary
Containment of Impacted or Potentially
Impacted Soil
Cross -Section View
Top Plastic Cover Sheeting: Underliner: 1 layer, minimum of 10
(1 Layer, minimum: 10 mil thick) mil thick plastic
Berm
(Straw bales, Weight
composted earth, etc.) (If plastic
cover used)
Land ' Contaminated Soils
Surface `17
\ z
Straw Bale Berm
Map View
' ■ El j. . ................ ___ ................................ . ... lki Weight
O^
■� Contaminated Soils
.....................................................
000 o Plastic
\ Sheeting
Note: Adapted from NC DEQ UST Section "Guidelines for Ex Situ Petroleum Contaminated Soil Remediation" dated December, 1, 2013
25
EMP Version 3, March 2023