26012_Admiration Hosiery Mill_EMP_20231108

Environmental Management Plan
Admiration Hosiery Mill
4210 Yancey Road, 315-351 E. Peterson Drive,
and 4201-4225 S. Tryon Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 26012-22-060
H&H Job No. WPP-015
September 7, 2023
hart � hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
#C-1269 Engineering
#C-245 Geology
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3921 Sunset Ridge Rd, Suite 301
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919.847.4241 main

Completed EMP Template Form
CONTENTS
Tables
Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Table 2 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Table 3 Summary of Sub -Slab and Exterior Soil Gas Analytical Results
Figures
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Sample Location Map
Appendices
Appendix A Site Plan/Grading Plan
Appendix B Cut/Fill Analysis
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.
The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory -compliant
decision -making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development -related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project,
and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be
cause for a reopener.
The EMP is valid only for the scope of work described herein and must be updated to be
applicable for new phases of redevelopment or after significant changes in applicable
regulatory guidance.
Voluntary Metrics Tab
The NC Brownfields Program updates estimated capital investment (from the Brownfields
Property Application) and estimated jobs created (from the Brownfields Agreement) whenever
possible. As a voluntary measure, you may opt to complete the below information for capital
investment and jobs created as estimated by your final redevelopment plans for the Brownfields
Property:
1. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: Click or tap here to enter text.
2. Estimated jobs created:
a. Construction Jobs: Click or tap here to enter text.
b. Full Time Post -Redevelopment Jobs: Click or tap here to enter text.
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Table of Contents
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................... 1
GENERAL INFORMATION........................................................................................................................ 4
COMMUNICATIONS................................................................................................................................
4
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM...............................................................................
5
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS........................................................................................................................ 5
CONTAMINATED MEDIA......................................................................................................................... 7
PART1. Soil.........................................................................................................................................
8
PART 2. GROUNDWATER..................................................................................................................
19
PART 3. SURFACE WATER..................................................................................................................
21
PART 4. SEDIMENT............................................................................................................................
21
PARTS. SOIL VAPOR.........................................................................................................................
22
PART6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR........................................................................................................
23
PART 7. INDOOR AIR.........................................................................................................................
24
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM.............................................................................................
24
CONTINGENCY PLAN — encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials .....................
25
POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING.....................................................................................................
28
APPROVAL SIGNATURES.......................................................................................................................
29
2
EMP Version 2, January 2021

So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.
® Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields' objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.
® Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:
® A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.
❑ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.
® Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.
❑ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
on site after construction grading.
❑ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).
® A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.
Please see Item 7b on Page 6.
® Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
® Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
❑ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.
❑ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.
❑ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.
EMP Version 2, January 2021

❑ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.
❑ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.
❑ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Date: 9/7/2023 Revision Date (if applicable):
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Admiration Hosiery Mill
Brownfields Project Number: 26012-22-060
Brownfields Property Address: 335-351 E. Peterson Drive, 4201-4225 S. Tryon Street, and 4210 Yancey
Road in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (see Figures 1 and 2)
Brownfields Property Area (acres): approximately 7.736 acres (see Figure 2)
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ....................... ❑ Yes ® No
If yes enter Permit No.:
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit............ ❑ Yes © No
If yes, enter Permit No.:
COMMUNICATIONS
A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE -SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.
Prospective Developer (PD): HLJ Mill, LLC and MLJ Multi, LLC
Contact Person: Jay W. Levell
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Contractor for PD: Benco Construction, LLC
Contact Person: David Anderson
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-275-0433 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC
Contact Person: Bo Cappleman
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Stephanie Graham
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-235-2195 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
Not Applicable
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsitetask:
On -site assessment or remedial activities: .................................................... 10 days Prior
Construction or grading start: .......................................................................... 10 days Prior
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ................................................................................ Within 48 hours
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones): ................................... Within 48 hours
Installation of mitigation systems: ................................................................ 10 days Prior
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies toimplement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ................................................................................. Within 30 days
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
®Residential ®Recreational ❑Institutional ®Commercial ®Office ®Retail ❑ Industrial
®Other specify:
Parking
2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth -moving activities
at the site:
5
EMP Version 2, January 2021

® Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
® Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
❑ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
Planned redevelopment at the Brownfields property includes construction of a multi -family
apartment complex with amenity space(s), surface parking, structured parking, a dog park/dog
run, and landscaped areas. Adaptive re -use for commercial purposes is currently planned for the
existing commercial building located in the southern portion of the site. Prior to redevelopment,
mass grading will be completed to achieve proposed final grade elevations. A copy of the
preliminary Site Plan prepared by Land Design is provided as Appendix A.
4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
❑ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.
5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
® If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.
6) Which category of risk -based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
® Residential ❑ Non -Residential or Industrial/Commercial
7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 10/1/2023
b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Q4 2023 — Commercial upfits to existing building
Grading —January 2024
Subgrade utilities —January/February 2024
Deep foundations — February/March 2024
Installation of subgrade components of vapor intrusion mitigation system (proposed
residential building only) and shallow foundation — March -August 2024
Vertical construction/interior improvements/installation of above -grade components of
vapor intrusion mitigation system — September to October 2025
Paving/landscaping — November/December 2025
a) Additional phases planned? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: Unknown
Planned Activity:
An additional phase of redevelopment will occur in the northern portion of the site; however,
the scope of this development is unclear at this time. The development will include one or
more multi -family residential buildings. A revised EMP will be prepared prior to the next
phase of development.
Planned Activity:
Start Date:
Planned Activity:
b) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: see below
Occupancy of the existing commercial building is planned for January 2024, and occupancy of the
multi -family residential building is planned for December/January 2025.
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Please fill out the sections below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas
of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure overlaying new
construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil: ..............................................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 2. Groundwater: ............................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 3. Surface Water: ..........................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 4. Sediment: ...................................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part S. Soil Vapor: ..................................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 6. Sub -Slab Soil Vapor: ..................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 7. Indoor Air: ...................................................
❑
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
® Unknown
7
EMP Version 2, January 2021

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.
PART 1. Soil
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
In 2015, a fuel oil underground storage tank (UST) was removed from the southern portion of the
site and no petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in two UST closure soil samples. In October
and November 2022, H&H conducted Brownfields Assessment activities at the site. A tabular
summary of the Brownfields Assessment soil analytical data in comparison to the January 2023
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Residential and Industrial/Commercial
Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) is included in Table 1. Approximate soil sample
locations are shown on Figure 3, and a brief summary of the results is provided below.
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Laboratory analytical results indicate that trace levels of several VOCs were detected at
concentrations above the laboratory method detection limits in multiple soil samples. No
detected VOC concentrations exceed the DEQ Residential or Industrial/Commercial PSRGs in soil
samples collected at the site. The chlorinated solvents tetra chloroethene (PCE) and
trichloroethene (TCE) were not detected in soil samples at concentrations above the laboratory
method detection limits.
Semi -Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
Benzo(a)pyrene was detected in composite sample COMP-5 (2-4) at a concentration above the
Residential PSRG but below the Industrial/Commercial PSRG. No other SVOCs were detected at
concentrations above Residential or Industrial/Commercial PSRGs.
Metals
Hexavalent chromium was detected in the COMP-4 (2-4) soil sample at a concentration above the
Residential PSRG but below the Industrial/Commercial PSRG. No other metals were detected at
concentrations above PSRGs and Site -specific or regional background levels. Metals detections
are likely naturally occurring.
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Soil samples were collected at depths ranging from 0 to 4 ft from across the site.
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
The majority of the Brownfields property (except the far southern portion beneath the existing
commercial building) will be disturbed as part of mass grading activities (approximately 369,900
square feet).
8
EMP Version 2, January 2021

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
The preliminary grading plan and cut/fill analysis are provided in Appendix B. Cut areas range in
depth from approximately 0.25 ft to approximately 6.5 ft below ground surface (bgs). Excavation
for the installation of new utilities may include trenching to estimated depths of 5 to 10 ft bgs.
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
Grading and construction activities for the proposed redevelopment at the site will generate
approximately 5,900 cubic yards of surficial cut (<_0.5 ft bgs) and approximately 4,150 cubic yards
of subsurface cut (0.5 to 6.5 ft) to achieve proposed final grade elevations. The site is anticipated
to be a net import site and efforts will be made to reuse the excavated soil from cut areas as fill
on the Site.
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
No impacted soil excavation is anticipated except for in the area of sample COMP-5 in the
southern portion of the site.
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
None. Soil excavated at the site is proposed to be re -used in fill areas during redevelopment.
Part I.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminarydata available).
1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ❑Yes ®No
❑ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
❑ If yes, do the soils exceed the "Contained -Out" levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained -In Policy? ................................................. ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED -OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED -IN POLICYTHE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
EMP Version 2, January 2021

c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE? .................................... ❑ Yes ® No
❑ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
❑ Ignitability
❑ Corrosivity
❑ Reactivity
❑ Toxicity
❑ TCLP results
❑ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
® If no, explain rationale:
The concentrations of total chromium detected in soil samples COMP-1 (0-2 ft)
and COMP-4 (2-4 ft) exceed the Rule of 20 concentration. However, Toxicity
Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) results did not indicate concentrations
of chromium compounds above the TCLP regulatory level in leachate from the
samples.
d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAYNOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
© Preliminary Health -Based Residential SRGs
❑ Preliminary Health -Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
© Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
❑ Site -specific risk -based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Additional comments:
3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
® Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
® Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known
10
EMP Version 2, January 2021

® Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
The use of a geotextile is not planned but will be considered.
® Manage soil under impervious cap ® or clean fill
® Describe cap or fill:
Should potentially impacted soil or fill materials be encountered during redevelopment that
do not require removal for geotechnical or construction purposes, the potentially impacted
soil may be placed beneath impervious surfaces (asphalt pavement, sidewalks, access roads,
buildings, etc.) or a minimum of 2 ft of clean fill pending DEQ Brownfields approval.
® Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re -recorded if
actions are Post -Recordation).
® GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
❑ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:
4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
® Yes, describe the method will include:
Significant areas of contaminated soil are not expected to be encountered or disturbed during
site redevelopment activities based upon soil sampling data. The grading contractor will
consider conditions such as wind speed, wind direction, and moisture content of soil during soil
grading and stockpiling activities to minimize dust generation. Particular attention will be paid
by contractors to implement dust control measures as needed based on Site and atmospheric
conditions and may be controlled using water application, hydro -seeding, and/or mulch, stone,
or plastic cover. Potentially impacted soil will be managed as described below.
❑ No, explain rationale:
Field Screening of site soil
® Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
During soil disturbance at the Site, the workers or contractors will observe soils for evidence
of potential impacts. Evidence of potentially impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural
color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e., chemicals,
tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be noted during site work, the contractor will contact
the project environmental professional to observe the suspect condition. If the project
environmental professional confirms that the material may be impacted, then the
procedures below will be implemented. In addition, the DEQ Brownfields project manager
will be contacted within 48 hours to advise of the condition.
11
EMP Version 2, January 2021

❑ No, explain rationale:
Soil Sample Collection
® Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in -situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
PCBs may be present within concrete and/or underlying soils in the vicinity of a hydraulic
freight elevator within the existing commercial building. Prior to disturbance of the
stained concrete and underlying soil, one sample will be collected from the hydraulic oil
contained within the elevator motor, one sample will be collected of stained concrete,
and one sample will be collected of soil beneath the concrete slab for laboratory analysis
of PCBs by EPA Method 8082A. H&H will provide the results of analysis to DEQ, and
disposal of PCB -containing hydraulic oil, concrete, and/or soil will be conducted in
accordance with applicable EPA regulations.
® No, explain rationale:
If soil impact is encountered during grading and/or installation or removal of utilities,
excavation will proceed only as far as needed to allow grading or other construction -
related activity to continue and/or only as far as needed to allow alternate corrective
measures as described below. Suspect impacted soil excavated during redevelopment
activities may be stockpiled and covered in a secure area to allow construction to
progress. Suspect impacted soil will be stockpiled in accordance with Figure 1, NCBP
Diagram for Temporary Containment of Impacted or Potentially Impacted Soil. At least
one representative soil sample (no less than 3 aliquot soil samples) at a sample ratio of 1
soil sample per every approximately 1,000 cubic yards of soil will be collected for analysis
of total VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA metals, and hexavalent chromium. If the soil sample
laboratory analytical results indicate that the soil could potentially exceed toxicity
characteristic hazardous waste criteria, then the soil will also be analyzed by TCLP for
those compounds that could exceed the toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria.
Impacted soil will be handled in the manner described below based upon the laboratory
analyses:
i. If no organic compounds or metals are detected in a sample (other than which are
attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with
background levels for metals) above protection of groundwater or Residential
PSRGs (whichever is lower for the detected compounds), the TCLP concentrations
are below hazardous waste criteria, and the cumulative risk calculator results are
acceptable, then the soil will be deemed suitable for use as on -site fill or as off -
site fill with DEQ approval. The proposed location(s) for off -site placement of soil
(other than a Municipal Solid Waste Landfill [MSWLF] or other permitted facility)
along with the receiving facility's written approval for acceptance of the soil will
be provided to DEQ for approval prior to taking the soil off -site.
ii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed Residential PSRGs
(other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are
consistent with background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations are
12
EMP Version 2, January 2021

below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil may be used on -site as fill without
conditions.
iii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the Residential PSRGs
(other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are
consistent with background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations are
below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil, with DEQ's written approval, may
be used on -site as fill below an impervious surface, at least 2 ft of compacted
demonstrably clean soil, or overlain by a geotechnical fabric and at least 1 ft of
demonstrably clean soil. If the impacted soil with concentrations above
Residential PSRGs is moved to an on -site location, its location and depth will be
documented and provided to DEQ and the impacted soil will be placed beneath at
least 2 ft of compacted demonstrably clean soil, an impervious surface, or
covered by a geotechnical fabric.
iv. Impacted soil may be transported to a MSWLF or DEQ permitted landfarm provided
that the soil is accepted at the disposal facility. DEQ Solid Waste Section and DEQ
Brownfields Program approval will be requested for any potential export to an
off -Site facility other than a MSWLF or DEQ permitted landfarm. If soil is
transported to a MSWLF or DEQ permitted landfarm, the facility's written
approval in the form of waste manifests or similar will be included with the
annual redevelopment report. In the unlikely event that the sample data
indicates concentrations above TCLP hazardous waste criteria, then the soil must
be transported off -Site to a MSWLF that can accept or treat hazardous waste.
* Please note that should the PD elect to transport export soil to a MSWLF, DEQ
permitted landfarm, or to a DEQ Brownfields pre -approved receiving facility, soil will be
direct -loaded onto trucks for transport off -site.
If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Methods 6020/7471
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
® PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 8082A (only applicable to potential samples beneath freight elevator)
® Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199
13
EMP Version 2, January 2021

® Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:
® Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (Check all thatapply):
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Methods 6020/7471
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
® Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199
Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, indicate if a work
plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
A Final Grade Sampling Plan will be prepared following review of final landscape/hardscape
plans for the site. The work plan will be submitted to DEQ Brownfields Program under
separate cover. If no areas exist that warrant final grade sampling, documentation will be
provided to the DEQ Brownfields project manager and/or the DEQ Brownfields Property
Management Unit.
❑ If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale:
14
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Part 1.13. IMPORTED FILL SOIL
NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, "Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner."
Requirements for importing fill:
1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ................................................ ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
Based on preliminary grading plans and cut/fill analysis, approximately 11,000 cubic yards of fill
will need to be imported to the site to achieve the desired grades. Additionally, limited amounts
of virgin organic rich topsoil may be imported from a commercial landscape material vendor for
use in proposed landscaped areas.
3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (if a range
of depths, please list the range.)
approximately 0 to 6.5 feet
4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
The source of the fill material has not been determined at this time. The PD may utilize existing soil
data for the site and other local Brownfields Properties to determine a suitable import source. Once
a suitable source has been identified, the PD will provide the information and proposed import
source to the DEQ Brownfields Program for approval. Alternatively, the PD will import fill material
from the Vulcan Materials Company quarry located near Pineville, NC or from the Martin Marietta
quarry located on Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, NC.
5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use atthe Brownfields property.
To demonstrate that imported soil is suitable for use at the site (other than fill obtained from DEQ
Brownfields pre -approved borrow sites), the fill soil will be sampled and approved by DEQ
Brownfields prior to being brought to the site. See Part 1.B. 7 below for details outlining the
proposed plan to demonstrate that import soil meets acceptable standards applicable to the site.
6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
© Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
15
EMP Version 2, January 2021

® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Methods 6020/7471
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
® Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199
7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in -situ
borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought
onto the Brownfields Property.
The PD will follow the procedures outlined below to demonstrate import soil meets acceptable
standards applicable to the Site:
- If the PD plans to import virgin fill material (i.e., not reused or recycled material) from Vulcan
Materials Company quarry located near Pineville, NC or from the Martin Marietta quarry located
on Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, NC, no samples of the import material will be collected as
adequate analytical data is available in the DEQ Brownfields database to demonstrate material from
these facilities is suitable for use as structural fill at a Brownfields property.
- If fill soil is obtained from a developed (or previously developed) off -site property that is not a
known permitted quarry, soil samples will be collected for laboratory analyses indicated above at
a general rate of approximately one sample per 500 cubic yards. The sample will consist of a
composite sample (with a minimum 3 aliquots samples) for non-VOC analysis and a grab sample
for VOC analysis.
- If the proposed borrow source has not been previously developed (i.e., virgin land), soil samples
will be collected for laboratory analyses indicated above at a general rate of one sample per 1,000
cubic yards. The sample will consist of a composite sample (with a minimum 3 aliquots samples)
for non-VOC analysis and a grab sample for VOC analysis.
Fill soil will be considered suitable for use at the site if it does not contain compound concentrations
above DEQ Residential PSRGs, metals concentrations are generally consistent with regional
background levels or background levels consistent with concentrations previously identified at the
Brownfields Property, or the results of risk calculations using the latest version of the DEQ Risk
Calculator indicate that VOC, SVOC, and metals concentrations detected in fill soil are suitable for
a residential exposure scenario. DEQ approval of the analytical results will be obtained prior to
transporting import soil to the site.
16
EMP Version 2, January 2021

The PD also plans to import limited amounts of virgin topsoil from a commercial landscape material
vendor for use in proposed landscaped areas. The PD does not plan to collect samples of
landscaping materials prior to placement at the Site.
Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL
NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.
1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.
Up to approximately 10,000 cubic yards of soil is anticipated to be generated during site grading
activities. Excavated soil is planned for use as fill at the site. However, if soil export is deemed
necessary, in -situ or stockpile sampling may be performed. In -situ composite sampling will be
performed in proposed cut areas at the site in accordance with a DEQ-approved Work Plan. The
results of the export soil assessment will be presented to DEQ Brownfields under separate cover
if assessment activities are conducted.
In general, it is anticipated that export soil sampling will include the collection of grab samples for
laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260 and collection of composite samples for
laboratory analysis of SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, RCRA metals by EPA Method 6020/7471, and
hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199. It is anticipated that the composite samples will be
collected at a rate of approximately one sample per 1,000 cubic yards. Sample volume for SVOCs
and metals analysis will be collected from up to five sample aliquot locations to form one
composite sample. Each aliquot will be field screened for the presence of VOCs using a calibrated
photo -ionization detector (PID). VOC samples will be collected as grab samples from the aliquot
which exhibits the highest indication of impact during field screening.
Following completion of the soil sampling activities and receipt of the analytical data, H&H will
prepare a data summary package for DEQ review. The data summary package will include a tabular
summary of the laboratory analytical results in comparison to the regulatory screening levels and
background metals concentrations, and a copy of the laboratory analytical report. H&H assumes
that the data summary package can be reviewed by DEQ to provide guidance regarding potential
export site selection. Based on analytical results of soil samples collected from the export soil, the
soil will be transported off -Site to a suitable location. The PD will notify DEQ Brownfields of the
location receiving the export soil. If not a permitted facility (e.g., another Brownfields property),
17
EMP Version 2, January 2021

written approval from DEQ Brownfields and the receiving facility will be obtained prior to
transporting the soil off -site. If the receiving facility is a non-Brownfields property, DEQ Solid
Waste Section approval will be obtained prior to transporting the soil off -site.
2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
® Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
® Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting Landfill;
® Landfarm or other treatment facility
® Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property — determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and thata record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
® Use as Beneficial Fill off -site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.
3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).
The environmental professional will contact DEQ Brownfields to obtain DEQ Brownfields and
DEQ Solid Waste approval prior to exporting soil to a non-MSWLF.
Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
❑ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)
® Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is nota
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original
depth from which it was excavated.
❑ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
❑ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials or provide the results of this evaluation in the
Vapor Mitigation Plan. Note that if vapor mitigation is planned for site buildings, utility
corridors will need to be evaluated as part of mitigation designs:
18
EMP Version 2, January 2021

❑ If no, include rationale here:
® Unknown, details to be provided in the Vapor Mitigation Plan for site buildings
Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Although not anticipated, in the event that evidence of contaminated soil and/or vapors (e.g., unusual
odors and/or stained soil) is encountered in utility trenches during redevelopment activities, the trench
will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be performed to protect workers.
If results indicate further action is warranted in response to vapors to protect workers, appropriate
engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.
The contractor and workers will observe soil for potential impacts during utility installation activities.
Evidence of potential significant impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled
or previously disposed materials of concern (i.e., chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be
noted during utility work, the contractor will contact the project environmental professional to observe
the suspect condition and screen the soil using a PID or other similar vapor field screening instrument.
If the project environmental professional confirms that the material may be impacted, then the
procedures outlined above in Managing On -Site Soil (Part 1.A.) will be implemented. In addition, the
environmental professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within 48 hours to advise
that person of the condition.
PART 2. GROUNDWATER
1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
The depth to groundwater measured in monitoring wells installed at the Site in December 2021
and October 2022 ranged from approximately 12.70 ft bgs to approximately 21.79 ft bgs.
2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ❑onsite ❑offsite ❑both or ®unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
Groundwater assessment at the Brownfields property included the collection of seven (7)
groundwater samples for laboratory analysis. Locations of previous groundwater samples are
shown in Figure 3, and a tabular summary of groundwater sample laboratory analytical results is
included as Table 2. A brief summary of the groundwater assessment results is provided below.
VOCs and SVOCs
Groundwater assessment results indicate that 1,2-dichloroethane was detected in the TMW-2
groundwater sample collected from the central portion of the southern site parcel on 12/20/2021
at a concentration above the DEQ 2L Standard. 1,2-Dichloropropane was detected in the TMW-3
groundwater sample collected from the west -central portion of the site on 10/21/2022 at a
concentration above the 2L Standard. The detected concentrations of 1,2-dichloroethane and 1,2-
dichloropropane in groundwater did not exceed Residential or Non -Residential GWSLs. No other
organic compounds were detected at concentrations above the DEQ 2L Standard or DEQ DWM
19
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Vapor Intrusion GWSLs in groundwater samples collected at the Site.
Metals
Chromium was detected in the TMW-3 groundwater sample collected from the southwestern
portion of the southern site parcel on 12/21/2021 at a concentration above the 2L Standard. No
other metals were detected at concentrations above the DEQ 2L Standards or DEQ DWM Vapor
Intrusion GWSLs in groundwater samples collected at the Site.
3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
Groundwater at the Site flows generally to the west-northwest towards unnamed tributaries of
Irwin Creek.
4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, describe these activities:
Based on the depth to water data and preliminary grading plans, it is not anticipated that
groundwater will be encountered during planned redevelopment activities.
Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered
during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent
management of groundwater (e.g., dewateringof groundwater from excavations or
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or
sampling procedures).
Appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken if groundwater gathers in an open
excavation within an area determined to be impacted (based on previous sampling data, strong
odor, unnatural color, sheen, etc.) during construction activities. The contractor will contact the
environmental professional to observe the area(s) suspected to be impacted. The accumulated
water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent time for dissipation does not disrupt
the construction schedule. Should the time needed for natural dissipation of accumulated water
be deemed inadequate, the water will be tested for the presence of VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA
metals and disposed off -site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not
impacted above DEQ surface water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and State
regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control.
5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property? ................. ❑Yes ®No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................❑Yes ❑No
6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
❑ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program's intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
20
EMP Version 2, January 2021

❑ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
❑ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
® Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.
7) Please provide additional details as needed:
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.
PART 3. SURFACE WATER
1) Is surface water present at the property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ❑ Yes ® No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ® No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
Surface water features are not present at the Site.
If surface water run-off gathers in an open excavation within an area suspected to be impacted
during construction activities, appropriate worker safety and groundwater management
measures will be undertaken. The contractor will contact the environmental professional to
observe the area(s) suspected to be impacted. The accumulated water will be allowed to
evaporate/infiltrate to the extent that the time for dissipation does not disrupt the construction
schedule. Should the time needed for natural dissipation of accumulated water be deemed
inadequate, the water will be tested for the presence of VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals and
disposed off -Site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted
above DEQ surface water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and State
regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control.
PART 4. SEDIMENT
1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ❑ Yes ® No
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
21
EMP Version 2, January 2021

3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ® No
4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.
5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
Not applicable
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:...........® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Groundwater: ..... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:...........® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Groundwater: ..... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?
As part of the November 2022 assessment activities, 11 exterior soil gas samples were collected within
the proposed apartment building footprint. Laboratory analytical results indicate the presence of
multiple VOCs at concentrations above the DEQ Vapor Intrusion Sub -Slab and Exterior Soil Gas
Screening Levels (SGSLs). A tabular summary of the soil gas laboratory analytical results is provided in
Table 3, and sample locations are presented on Figure 3.
Results of soil gas sampling identified benzene, 1,3-butadiene, chloroform, and ethylbenzene at
concentrations above the Residential SGSLs in at least one sample. Chloroform was detected in the
SG-3 soil gas sample at a concentration exceeding the Non -Residential SGSL.
Results of worst -case risk calculations performed for the SG-1 through SG-11 soil gas samples did not
indicate a significant vapor intrusion concern under a residential use scenario. However, as indicated
in Section 7, the PD intends to install a vapor intrusion mitigation system in the proposed apartment
building.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑X Unknown In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during
redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list
activities for management of such contact:
The environmental professional will remain on call on an as -needed -basis during redevelopment
22
EMP Version 2, January 2021

activities at the Site. If contaminated soil vapors are suspected during redevelopment activities
(based on unusual or strong odors, dizziness, lightheadedness, coughing, difficulty breathing,
etc.), the excavation area will be evacuated, and the environmental professional will be called to
perform appropriate safety screening of the vapors. Safety screening activities include
monitoring the worker breathing zone with a calibrated multi -gas monitor (or similar
instrument[s] capable of detecting VOCs and combustible gases) for VOCs, methane, oxygen,
carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate
engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented. In addition, the
environmental professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within 48 hours
regarding the condition.
PART 6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in sub -slab soil vapor:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:...........® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Groundwater: ..... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) Groundwater:..... ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown If data indicate that sub -slab soil vapor
concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub -slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? 00-6 inches El Other, please
describe:
As part of the December 2021 and November 2022 assessment activities, 13 sub -slab vapor
samples were collected from the existing commercial building, which is planned for non-
residential purposes only. The results of analysis of the sub -slab vapor samples indicated the
presence of 1,3-butadiene in one sample at a concentration above the Residential SGSL but below
the Non -Residential SGSL. No TCE was detected above the laboratory method detection limits in
any sub -slab vapor sample.
Results of cumulative risk calculations utilizing the highest concentration of each compound
detected in any sub -slab vapor sample collected in December 2021 and November 2022 indicate
that the cumulative carcinogenic and non -carcinogenic risks are orders of magnitude below the
DEQ and EPA acceptable levels for a non-residential scenario. Specifically, the calculated hazard
index is 0027 for a non-residential exposure scenario. As indicated in Section 7, vapor mitigation
is not planned for commercial reuse of the existing commercial building.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub -slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑X Unknown
❑ If no, include rationale here:
23
EMP Version 2, January 2021

5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
The environmental professional will remain on call on an as -needed -basis during redevelopment
activities at the Site. If contaminated soil vapors are suspected during redevelopment activities
(based on unusual or strong odors, dizziness, lightheadedness, coughing, difficulty breathing,
etc.), the excavation area will immediately be evacuated, and the environmental professional
will be called to perform appropriate safety screening of the vapors. Safety screening activities
include monitoring the worker breathing zone with a calibrated multi -gas monitor (or similar
instrument[s] capable of detecting VOCs and combustible gases) for VOCs, methane, oxygen,
carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide photoionization detector. If results indicate further action
is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be
implemented. In addition, the environmental professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields
project manager within 48 hours regarding the condition.
PART 7. INDOOR AIR
1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk -based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Not Applicable
❑ If no, include rationale here:
As indicated above, sub -slab vapor sample analysis within the existing commercial building did
not indicate the presence of a vapor intrusion concern.
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:
In the unlikely event there is evidence of potential indoor air issues (i.e., unusual odors are identified
or workers report lightheadedness or other unusual physical reaction) during future redevelopment
activities, the area will be evacuated, and appropriate safety screening of the indoor air will be
performed. If warranted, safety screening procedures will include periodically screening indoor air for
volatile organic vapors with a calibrated PID. If results indicate further action is warranted,
appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
❑ If no or unknown, include rationale here as well as plans for pre -occupancy sampling, as
necessary:
24
EMP Version 2, January 2021

If yes, ❑ VIMS Plan Attached or ® VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
A VIMS Plan will be submitted under separate cover to DEQ Brownfields for the proposed
residential development at the site.
VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer
If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
No vapor intrusion mitigation is warranted for the commercial building, which is planned for
non-residential purposes only. The results of analysis of the sub -slab vapor samples indicated
the presence of 1,3-butadiene in one sample at a concentration above the Residential SGSL but
below the Non -Residential SGSL. No TCE was detected above the laboratory method detection
limits in any sub -slab vapor sample.
Results of cumulative risk calculations utilizing the highest concentration of each compound
detected in any sub -slab vapor sample collected in December 2021 and November 2022 indicate
that the cumulative carcinogenic and non -carcinogenic risks are orders of magnitude below the
DEQ and EPA acceptable levels for a non-residential scenario. Specifically, the calculated hazard
index is 0027 for a non-residential exposure scenario.
Note that approval of this EMP does not imply approval with any vapor intrusion mitigation land
use restrictions or requirements of the recorded or draft Brownfields Agreement and that
separate approval of mitigation measures will be required.
CONTINGENCY PLAN — encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials
In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, orother waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.
Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site -specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.
Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
EPA Methods 6020/7471
25
EMP Version 2, January 2021

❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
® Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199
Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
During construction activities, contractors may encounter unknown subsurface environmental
conditions (i.e., tanks, drums, or waste materials) that if encountered, will require management.
Prior to beginning site work, H&H will attend a pre -construction kick-off meeting with the PD and
the redevelopment contractors to discuss the DEQ-approved EMP and various scenarios when it
would be appropriate and necessary to notify H&H of the discovery of unknown subsurface features
or potentially impacted media at the site.
In the event that such conditions are encountered during site development activities, the
environmental actions noted below will be used to direct environmental actions to be taken during
these activities and sampling data for potentially impacted soil and the disposition of impacted soil
will be provided to DEQ when the data becomes available.
Underground Storage Tanks:
In the event a UST or impacts associated with a UST release are discovered at the Site during
redevelopment activities, the UST and/or UST related impacts will be addressed through the
Brownfields Program. DEQ Brownfields will be notified within 48 hours of discovery of the UST.
If an undocumented UST is encountered, residual fluids (if present) will be removed, sampled for
VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals, and transported off -Site for disposal at a suitable facility based on
the laboratory analytical results. Following the removal of residual fluids, the tank will be removed
and closure soil sampling will be performed. The number of soil samples will be consistent with
DEQ UST Section guidelines. The soil samples will be submitted for laboratory analysis of VOCs,
SVOCs, RCRA metals, and hexavalent chromium. Impacted soil will be managed in accordance with
the Managing On -Site Soil (Part LA.) section outlined above.
If the UST cannot be removed for geotechnical or construction purposes, DEQ will be notified for
approval of in -place closure. Following DEQ approval, closure soil sampling will be performed in
general accordance with the DEQ UST Section guidelines. Where appropriate, the bottom of the
UST may be penetrated before abandonment to prevent fluid accumulation. If the UST contains
residual fluids, the fluids will be removed, sampled for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals, and
transported off -site for disposal at a suitable facility based on the laboratory analytical results. A
26
EMP Version 2, January 2021

survey plat update may also be needed in the event of in -place closure of USTs.
Sub -Grade Feature/Pit:
If a sub -grade feature or pit is encountered and does not require removal for geotechnical or
construction purposes, it will be filled with soil or suitable fill and construction will proceed. Where
appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before back filling to prevent fluid accumulation. If the
pit has waste in it, the waste may be set aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste
disposal purposes for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, and TCLP metals and disposed off -site at a permitted
facility or the waste will be managed in accordance with the Managing On -Site Soil (Part LA.)
section outlined above, whichever is most applicable based on the type of waste present. If the pit
must be removed and the observed waste characteristics indicate the concrete may potentially be
contaminated to a significant degree, the concrete will be sampled and analyzed by methods
specified by the disposal facility.
Buried Waste Material — Note that if buried waste, non-native fill, or any obviously filled materials
is encountered, the DEQ Brownfields Program must be notified to determine if investigation of
landfill gases is required:
If excavation into buried wastes or significantly impacted soils occurs, the contractor is instructed to
stop work in that location and notify the environmental consultant. The environmental consultant
will observe the suspect materials and collect samples if warranted. In this event, confirmation
sampling will be conducted at representative locations in the base and the sidewalls of the
excavation after the waste or significantly impacted soil is removed. The confirmation samples will
be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA metals, hexavalent chromium (or other analyses as appropriate
based on the type of waste material). Information will be provided to DEQ Brownfields regarding
the permitted facility used for disposal of the waste or significantly impacted soil. Areas of
suspected contaminated soil that remain at the site after excavation is complete above the DEQ
Residential PSRGs will be managed pursuant to this plan.
Re -Use of Impacted Soils On -Site:
Please refer to description outlined in the Managing On -Site Soil section (Part LA.) of the EMP
above.
If unknown, impacted soil is identified on -site, management on -site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part I.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on -site.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
27
EMP Version 2, January 2021

POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
® Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 1/31/2024
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment -related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).
❑X Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site's Brownfields Agreement.
28
EMP Version 2, January 2021

APPROVAL SIGNATURES
Brownfields Project Number: 26012-22-060
Brownfields Project Name:: Admiration Hosiery Mill
Prospective Developer: HU Mill, LLC and HLJ Multi, LLC Date
Printed Name/Title/Company: Jay W. Levell/Manager/
HU Mill, LLC and HU Multi, LLC
G
11-1-23
Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC Date
Printed Name/Title/Company: Bo Cappleman/Due Diligence
Manager/Hart & Hickman, PC
11/8/2023
Brown, ields Project Manager: Stephanie Graham Date
29
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Figure 1
NCBP Diagram for Temporary
Containment of Impacted or Potentially
Impacted Soil
Cross -Section View
Top Plastic Cover Sheeting: Underliner: 1 layer, minimum of 10
(1 Layer, minimum: 10 mil thick) mil thick plastic
Berm
(Straw bales,
composted earth, etc.)
Land
Surface
\ x
Straw Bale Berm
Contaminated Soils
Map View
Uo o0*1- - -37
�L..
""' Contaminated Soils
Weight
(If plastic
cover used)
I�
Weight
.......................................................
aO Plastic
Sheeting
Note: Adapted from NC DEQ UST Section "Guidelines for Ex Situ Petroleum Contaminated Soil Remediation" dated December, 1, 2013
30
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Table 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Admiration Hosiery Mill
Yancey Road, S. Tryon Street, and E. Peterson Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project #26012-22-060
H&H Job No. WPP-015
Sample ID
COMP-1
COMP-2
COMP-3
COMP-DUP
COMP-4
COMP-5
BG-1
Published Background
Maximum
Date Sample Collected
10/28/2022
1 10/28/2022
10/27/2022
10/27/2022
10/28/2022 1 10/28/2022
10/28/2022 1 10/28/2022
10/28/2022 1 10/28/2022
Proposed Area of Cut Northeast
Prop
Proposed Area of Cut Southwest
p
Residential
Industrial/
Commercial
Metals Concentrations for North
Concentration of
Contaminants for
Sample Location
Footprint of Proposed Apartment
Proposed Area of Cut in the
the Former OMB
of the Former OMB
Undisturbed Area in the
�)
PSRGs (
Carolina Soils (2)
Building
Northeastern Portion of the Site
Southwestern Portion of the Site
PSRGs (')
Toxicity
Aof dministrative Offices
Administrative Offices
(5)
Characteristic
Depth (ft bgs)
0-2
0-2
0-2
0-2
2-4
0-2
2-4
0-2
2-4
Range
Mean
VOCs (8260D)
Acetone
0.013 J
0.091
0.014 J
0.022
0.021 J
0.041
0.019 J
0.013 J
NA
NA
14,000
210,000
2-Butanone (MEK)
<0.0008
0.011 J
<0.0008
<0.001
<0.0009
<0.0009
<0.0008
<0.0008
NA
NA
5,500
40,000
Carbon disulfide
<0.0008
0.001 J
<0.0007
<0.0007
<0.0009
<0.0009
0.006
<0.0008
NA
NA
160
740
4-Isopropyl toluene
<0.001
0.006
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
NA
NA
NS
NS
Methylene chloride
<0.001
0.003 J
<0.001
<0.001
<0.002
<0.002
<0.001
<0.001
NA
NA
58
650
SVOCs (8270E)
Benzo(a)anthrace ne
<0.163
<0.159
<0.160
<0.152
<0.193
<0.190
<0.165
0.355 J
NA
NA
1.1
21
Benzo(a)pyrene
<0.173
<0.169
<0.169
<0.161
<0.204
<0.201
<0.174
0.293 J
NA
NA
0.11
2.1
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
0.196 J
<0.168
<0.168
<0.160
<0.203
<0.199
<0.173
0.334 J
NA
NA
1.1
21
Chrysene
<0.167
<0.163
<0.163
<0.155
<0.197
<0.194
<0.168
0.321 J
NA
NA
110
2,100
Fluoranthene
0.278 J
0.202 J
<0.142
<0.135
<0.171
<0.168
0.183 J
0.652 J
NA
NA
480
6,000
Phenanthrene
<0.245
<0.239
<0.240
<0.228
<0.289
<0.284
<0.247
0.300 J
NA
NA
NS
NS
Pyrene
0.252 J
0.197 J
<0.154
<0.147
<0.186
<0.183
0.167 J
0.571 J
NA
NA
360
4,500
Metals (6020B/7471B/7199)
1.92
1.94
1.06
1.31
1.59
1.27
1.18
0.687
1.34
2.28
0.68
3.0
1.0 - 18
4.8
Arsenic
Barium
46.3
49.8
42.8
32.7
39.6
56.9
98.9
164
75.1
37.4
3,100
47,000
50 - 1,000
356
Cadmium
0.116 J
0.249 J
0.0615 J
0.0497 J
<0.0360
<0.0354
0.151 J
0.0803 J
0.400
<0.0334
1.4
20
1.0 - 10(3)
4.3(3)
Trivalent Chromium
131
40.4
66.5
71.3
64.3
164.75
40.4
45.6
38.3
56.5
23,000
350,000
7.0 - 300
65
Hexavalent Chromium
<0.170
<0.163
<0.162
<0.158
<0.198
1.25
<0.167
<0.175
<0.173
<0.181
0.31
6.5
NS
NS
Total Chromium
131
40.4
66.5
71.3
64.3
166
40.4
45.6
38.3
56.5
7.0 - 300
65
Lead
42.9
28.3
37.8
30.8
6.93
7.35
14.0
12.3
63.2
10.9
400
800
ND - 50
16
Mercury
0.0285 J
0.0980
0.0246 J
0.0232 J
0.0449
0.0304 J
0.0288 J
0.117
0.0454
0.0440
4.7
70
0.03 - 0.52
0.12
Selenium
0.442
0.423
0.262 J
0.432
0.382
0.419
0.331
0.161 J
0.558
0.776
78
1,200
<0.1 - 0.8
0.42
Silver
0.0390 J
0.0285 J
0.0215 J
0.0199 JB
0.0125 J
0.0093 J
0.0337 J
0.0249 J
0.0573 JB
0.0228 JB
78
1,200
ND - 5.0(')
NS
ITCLP Chromium (6010D)
5.0
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (January2023)
2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils published in Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005.
3) Background values reported for soils of the southeastern United States.
4) Background values reported for soils of the conterminous United States.
5) Obtained from Chapter 7 of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) SW-846 Compendium: Introductory and Regulatory Definitions Pertaining to Hazardous Waste Characteristics (2004).
Trivalent chromium calculated as total chromium minus hexavalent chromium.
Aside from metals, only constituents detected in at least one sample are shown.
Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.
VOC, SVOC, and metals data are shown in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). TCLP data are shown in milligrams per liter (mg/L).
Bold indicates concentration exceeds DEQ IHSB Residential PSRG and is above Site -specific and regional background levels.
J = estimated concentration that is above the laboratory method detection limit (MDL) but below the laboratory reporting limit
B = analyte was detected in a method blank
NS = no standard has been established
NA = not analyzed for specified constituent
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram; mg/L = milligrams per Liter
Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)
https://haAhick.sharcpoint.com/sites/Maste Files-1/Shared Documents/AAA-MasterP jwWWhite Point Pon-(WPP)/WPP-015 Yancey Road/Bro nSelds/EMP/Data Tables
2/27/2023 Hart & Hickman, PC

Table 2
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Admiration Hosiery Mill
Yancey Road, S. Tryon Street, and E. Peterson Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project #26012-22-060
H&H Job No. WPP-015
Sample ID
TMW-1
TMW-2
TMW-3
TMW-1
TMW-2
TMW-3
TMW-4
TMW-DUP
Trip Blank
NC 2L
Groundwater
a
Residential
Non -Residential
Date Sample Collected
12/20/2021
12/20/2021
12/21/2021
10/31/2022
10/31/2022
10/31/2022
10/31/2022
10/31/2022
10/31/2022
Southwestern Portion
Standards
GWSLs (2)
GWSLs (3)
Location Description
Eastern Portion of the
Central Portion of the
of the Southern Site
Northwestern Portion
Northeastern Portion
West -Central Portion
East-Central Portion of the Site
Southern Site Parcel
Southern Site Parcel
of the Site
of the Site
of the Site
Parcel
Units
µ /L
VOCs (8260D)
Acetone
<1.80
2.70 J
2.62 J
<1.80
<1.80
<1.80
<1.80
<1.80
<1.80
6,000
NS
NS
Bromobenzene
<0.210
<0.210
<0.210
<0.210
<0.210
<0.210
<0.210
<0.210
0.654
NS
120
520
Chloroform
<0.220
0.408 J
0.337 J
<0.220
<0.220
<0.220
<0.220
<0.220
<0.220
70
0.81
3.6
Dibromomethane
<0.230
3.78
<0.230
<0.230
<0.230
<0.230
<0.230
<0.230
<0.230
NS
25
100
1,2-Dichloroethane
<0.240
0.760
<0.240
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
0.4
22
98
1,2-Dichloropropane
<0.190
<0.190
<0.190
<0.190
<0.190
0.828
<0.190
<0.190
<0.190
0.6
6.6
30
Methylene Chloride
<0.330
<0.330
0.409 J
<0.330
<0.330
<0.330
<0.330
<0.330
0.376 J
5
760
4,000
Trichlorofluoromethane
<0.180
0.395 J
<0.180
<0.180
<1.80
<1.80
<1.80
<1.80
<1.80
2,000
NS
NS
SVOCs (8270E)
All Below Laboratory Method Detection Limits
NA
RCRA Metals (6020A-B. 7470A)
Arsenic
<0.170
<0.170
0.447 J
<0.490
<2.45
<2.45
<0.490
<0.490
NA
10
Barium
23.8
31.7
149
191
63.0
148
98.6
91.6
NA
700
Cadmium
<0.160
<0.160
<0.160
0.216 J
<0.750
<0.750
<0.150
<0.150
NA
2
Chromium
<0.790
1.70 J
94.9
<1.00
<5.00
<5.00
7.45
1.01 J
NA
10
Lead
<0.260
<0.260
0.699 J
<0.500
<2.50
3.77 J
<0.500
<0.500
NA
15
Mercury
<0.07
<0.07
<0.07
<0.07
<0.07
0.13 J
<0.07
<0.07
NA
1
0.18
0.75
Selenium
1.79 J
1.88 J
1.78 J
<2.30
<11.5
<11.5
<2.30
<2.30
NA
20
Silver
<0.110
<0.110
<0.110
<0.130
<0.650
<0.650
<0.130
<0.130
NA
20
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) 15A NCAC 02L.0202 Groundwater Standards (2L Standards) (April 2022)
2) NC DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Residential Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSLs) (January 2023)
3) NC DEQ DWM Non -Residential Vapor Intrusion GWSLs (January 2023)
Compound concentrations reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L)
Aside from metals, only constituents detected in at least one sample are shown.
Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L).
Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
Bold indicates concentration exceeds DEQ 2L Standard and/or GWSLs
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi -volatile organic compounds; RCRA 0
NA = Not Analyzed; -- = Not Applicable
J = Estimated concentration that is above the laboratory MDL but below the laboratory reporting limit
Table 2 (Page 1 of
11)
htttpsz 23hick.sharcpoint.com/sitm/Maste Files-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/White Point Partners(WPP)/WPP-015 Yancey Road/Fro,nHelds/EMP/Data Tables Hart &Hickman, !C

Table 1
Summary of Sub -Slab & Exterior Soil Gas Analytical Results
Admiration Hosiery Mill
Yancey Road, S. Tryon Street, and E. Peterson Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project #26012-22-060
H&H Job No. WPP-015
Evaluation Area
Footprint of Proposed Apartment Building
Screening Criteria
Sample ID
SGA
SG-2
SG-3
SG-4
SG-5
SG-6
SG-7
SG-8
SG-9
SG-10
SG-11/SG-DUP
Sample Date
11/1/2022
11/1/2022
11/1/2022
11/1/2022
11/1/2022
11/2/2022
11/1/2022
11/1/2022
11/2/2022
11/1/2022
11/1/2022 11/1/2022
Residential
SGSLs I'I
Non -Residential
SGSLs (1)
Sample Type
Exterior Soil Gas
Units
Ng/m3
VOCs (TO-15)
Acetone
11.2
14.0
10.4
14.7
12.0
28.7
43.5
8.47
14.5
5.04
11.4
7.80
NE
NE
Benzene
9.01
5.58
12.8
14.8
27.3
7.87
42.9
26.5
1.31 J
29.0
30.3
27.7
12
160
Bromodichloromethane
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
0.811 J
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
2.5
33
Bromomethane
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
0.423 J
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
35
440
1,3-Butadiene
<0.328
13.2
3.18
2.22
3.87
2.34
23.3
<0.328
<0.328
<0.328
0.436 J
<0.328
3.1
41
2-Butanone (MEK)
1.47
2.20
1.93
16.7
2.25
5.37
11.2
1.29 J
2.13
0.832 J
1.71
0.938 J
35,000
440,000
Carbon Disuffide
41.3
70.8
136
108
103
24.1
400
143
3.27 J
140
143
137
4,900
61,000
Carbon Tetrachloride
<0.155
<0.155
1.05 J
<0.155
0.786 J
<0.155
<0.155
<0.155
0.528 J
0.956 J
<0.155
0.931 J
16
200
Chlorobenzene
<0.107
2.79
<0.107
<0.107
<0.107
1.40 J
<0.107
<0.107
<0.107
<0.107
1.39 J
<0.107
350
4,400
Chloroform
1.91 J
<0.0864
58.8
21.9
18.8
0.723 J
26.6
16.8
0.410 J
36.0
1.53 J
35.3
4.1
53
Chloromethane
2.38
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
0.756 J
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
630
7,900
Cyclohexane
3.79
9.61
6.97
<0.161
9.07
25.3
20.4
6.44
13.2
<0.161
4.94
<0.161
42,000
530,000
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
0.703 J
<0.186
0.986 J
0.896 J
<0.186
8.5
110
Dichlorodifluoromethane
2.45 J
3.21
2.53
2.25 J
2.40 J
<0.134
2.21 J
2.35 J
2.31 J
2.36 J
2.32 J
2.40 J
700
8,800
1,4-Dioxane
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
19
250
Ethyl acetate
0.782 J
<0.136
<0.136
<0.136
<0.136
1.27 J
<0.136
0.944 J
1.26 J
0.847 J
1.14 J
<0.136
490
6100
Ethylbenzene
40.9
6.08
48.1
27.7
68.1
6.92
70.9
69.7
0.695 J
98.9
88.5
98.6
37
490
4-Ethyltoluene
<0.128
0.826 J
15.2
5.24
22.8
0.664 J
15.0
14.5
<0.128
25.6
21.4
26.1
NE
NE
n-Heptane
20.0
66.4
132
503
326
71.3
1,010
55.3
1.02 J
297
102
295
2,800
35,000
n-Hexane
1.67 J
15.2
6.76
21.0
11.7
10.3
77.1
2.86
0.969 J
18.5
2.51
17.7
4,900
61,000
2-Hexanone
<0.285
<0.285
<0.285
<0.285
<0.285
<0.285
<0.285
<0.285
<0.285
<0.285
<0.285
<0.285
210
2,600
Isopropyl Alcohol
1.15 JB
1.08 B1,J
0.895 B1,J
3.73 J
1.47 JB
3.37 J
0.922 JB
0.639 JB
2.51 JB
0.949 JB
1.05 JB
0.850 JB
1,400
18,000
Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
0.681 J
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
360
4,700
Methylene Chloride
2.33
1.39 J
2.27
1.89
1.28 J
1.34 J
1.85
0.813 J
0.907 J
1.21 J
1.39 J
2.00
3,400
54,000
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
<0.121
<0.121
<0.121
<0.121
<0.121
<0.121
<0.121
<0.121
<0.121
<0.121
<0.121
<0.121
21,000
260,000
Naphthalene
<0.183
<0.183
<0.183
<0.183
0.493 J
<0.183
0.786 J
<0.183
<0.183
0.540 J
0.487 J
<0.183
2.8
36
Propylene
<0.242
527
6.34
22.9
10.4
69.5
263
3.10
<0.242
5.88
2.37
5.72
21,000
260,000
Styrene
<0.124
<0.124
<0.124
0.388 J
0.426 J
<0.124
1.61 J
<0.124
<0.124
<0.124
<0.124
<0.124
7,000
88,000
Tetrachloroethene
2.87 J
119
3.30 J
2.43 J
3.16 J
1.81 J
3.74
5.47
1.11 J
5.17
4.90
5.91
280
3,500
Tetrahydrofuran
<0.107
<0.107
1.54
2.66
2.82
<0.107
1.94
1.26 J
<0.107
2.61
3.23
2.51
14,000
180,000
Toluene
251
49.5
234
213
430
37.7
531
427
9.47
657
572
658
35,000
440,000
Trichloroethene
<0.199
4.97
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
14
180
Trichlorofluoromethane
1.45 J
<0.130
1.94 J
1.45 J
1.52 J
1.36 J
1.53 J
1.44 J
1.27 J
1.58 J
2.44 J
1.72 J
NE
NE
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
<0.561
<0.561
0.667 J
<0.561
<0.561
<0.561
<0.561
<0.561
<0.561
<0.561
<0.561
<0.561
35,000
440,000
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
11.3
1.24 J
40.8
14.0
65.1
2.07 J
38.5
44.2
0.433 J
82.6
62.3
84.1
420
5,300
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
7.23
0.418 J
11.7
5.20
18.0
0.600 J
12.6
7.26
<0.236
25.5
18.3
25.9
420
5,300
Vinyl acetate
<0.224
17.5
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
1,400
18,000
o-Xylene
62.8
9.68
55.1
28.4
77.1
6.27
66.4
73.0
0.777 J
106
103
105
700
8,800
m&p-Xylene
109
20.3
148
80.7
210
19.1
213
181
<0.217
299
272
301
700
8,800
Xylene (total)
172
30.0
203
109
287
25.4
279
254
0.777 J
405
375
406
700
8,800
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Sub -Slab & Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated January 2023.
Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (pg/m3).
Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).
Laboratory analytical method is shown in parentheses.
Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the above table.
Bold values exceed the DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSL.
Underlined values exceed the DWM Non -Residential SGSL.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; NE = not established
B = Analyte detected in blank.
J = Estimated concentration that is above the laboratory MDL but below the laboratory reporting limit
https:Hharthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/White Point Partners (WPP)/WPP-015 Yancey Road/Brownfields/EMP/Data Tables Table 3 (Page 1 of 2)
2/27/2023 Hart & Hickman, PC

Table 1
Summary of Sub -Slab & Exterior Soil Gas Analytical Results
Admiration Hosiery Mill
Yancey Road, S. Tryon Street, and E. Peterson Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project #26012-22-060
H&H Job No. WPP-015
Evaluation Area
Former OMB Administrative Offices/Warehouse
Screening Criteria
Sample ID
SSV-1
SSV-2
SSV-3
SSV-4
SSV-5
SSV-6
SSV-7 / SSV-DUP
SSV-8
SSV-9
SSV-10
SSV-11
SSV-12
SSV-13
Sample Date
12/6/2021
12/6/2021
12/6/2021
12/6/2021
12/6/2021
12/6/2021
11/10/2022 1 11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
11/10/2022
Residential
SGSLs I'1
Non -Residential
SGSLs (1)
Sample Type
Sub -Slab Soil Vapor
Units
Ng/m3
VOCs (TO-151
Acetone
11.6
253
17.5
146
37.2
52.2
18.9
19.1
454
23.8
14.7
63.1
280
47.2
NE
NE
Benzene
0.671 J
7.92
0.319 J
0.508 J
0.422 J
0.482 J
0.399 J
<0.0733
0.310 J
0.457 J
0.339 J
0.326 J
0.364 J
0.409 J
12
160
Bromodichloromethane
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
<0.150
2.5
33
Bromomethane
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
<0.115
35
440
1,3-Butadiene
<0.328
16.2
<0.328
<0.328
<0.328
<0.328
<0.328
<0.328
<0.328
<0.328
<0.328
<0.328
<0.328
<0.328
3.1
41
2-Butanone (MEK)
2.24
73.4
2.87
5.41
3.44
3.22
1.83
1.90
13.1
2.28
1.34 J
2.56
4.11
2.13
35,000
440,000
Carbon Disuffide
3.90 J
19.1
2.34 J
5.03 J
2.83 J
7.68
1.83 JB
1.87 JB
5.70 J
17.3
3.80 JB
2.06 JB
1.68 JB
8.87
4,900
61,000
Carbon Tetrachloride
<0.155
<0.155
<0.155
<0.155
<0.155
<0.155
<0.155
<0.155
<0.155
<0.155
<0.155
<0.155
<0.155
<0.155
16
200
Chlorobenzene
<0.107
<0.107
<0.107
<0.107
<0.107
<0.107
<0.107
<0.107
<0.107
<0.107
<0.107
<0.107
<0.107
<0.107
350
4,400
Chloroform
<0.0864
<0.0864
<0.0864
0.810 J
1.87 J
0.625 J
<0.0864
<0.0864
<0.0864
<0.0864
<0.0864
<0.0864
2.64
<0.0864
4.1
53
Chloromethane
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
<0.0673
630
7,900
Cyclohexane
<0.161
39.4
<0.161
7.48
5.49
5.01
<0.161
<0.161
3.71
<0.161
<0.161
<0.161
<0.161
<0.161
42,000
530,000
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
<0.186
8.5
110
Dichlorodifluoromethane
2.84
2.07 J
2.95
2.86
<0.134
2.76
2.50
2.45 J
2.39 J
2.60
2.38 J
2.39 J
2.36 J
2.34 J
700
8,800
1,4-Dioxane
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
<0.435
1.82
<0.435
19
250
Ethyl acetate
<0.136
<0.136
1.07 J
1.49 J
0.814 J
17.6
<0.136
<0.136
<0.136
<0.136
<0.136
<0.136
0.587 J
<0.136
490
6100
Ethylbenzene
<0.106
0.851 J
<0.106
2.24
1.75 J
0.695 J
<0.106
<0.106
<0.106
<0.106
<0.106
<0.106
<0.106
0.412 J
37
490
4-Ethyltoluene
<0.128
<0.128
<0.128
1.31 J
0.841 J
<0.128
<0.128
<0.128
0.914 J
<0.128
<0.128
<0.128
<0.128
<0.128
NE
NE
n-Heptane
<0.143
106
<0.143
1.73 J
<0.143
0.402 J
0.484 J
<0.143
<0.143
<0.143
<0.143
<0.143
<0.143
<0.143
2,800
35,000
n-Hexane
0.314 J
87.9
0.426 J
0.476 J
0.444 J
<0.0472
0.723 J
0.789 J
0.508 J
0.574 J
0.539 J
0.462 J
0.458 J
0.483 J
4,900
61,000
2-Hexanone
0.385 J
<0.285
0.414 J
<0.285
0.426 J
<0.285
0.414 J
0.487 J
1.12 J
0.696 J
<0.285
<0.285
<0.285
<0.285
210
2,600
Isopropyl Alcohol
3.24 J
62.2
3.24 J
7.43
3.93 J
8.07
3.66 JB
3.52 JB
199
4.94
2.55 JB
3.84 JB
16.0
4.54 J
1,400
18,000
Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
<0.0336
360
4,700
Methylene Chloride
1.81
2.62
2.32
2.64
1.76
2.50
7.53
21.7
42.8
54.2
58.0
60.4
50.1
40.9
3,400
54,000
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
<0.121
<0.121
0.700 J
0.844 J
0.397 J
1.12 J
0.877 J
0.905 J
1.71 J
0.586 J
<0.121
0.496 J
1.47 J
0.434 J
21,000
260,000
Naphthalene
1.08 J
0.708 J
0.446 J
0.729 J
0.482 J
0.550 J
0.812 J
0.917 J
0.671 J
0.519 J
0.566 J
0.461 J
0.482 J
0.571 J
2.8
36
Propylene
2.51
77.2
<0.242
<0.242
<0.242
<0.242
<0.242
<0.242
<0.242
<0.242
<0.242
<0.242
<0.242
<0.242
21,000
260,000
Styrene
<0.124
0.409 J
<0.124
0.392 J
<0.124
0.349 J
<0.124
<0.124
<0.124
<0.124
<0.124
<0.124
<0.124
<0.124
7,000
88,000
Tetrachloroethene
2.87 J
1.78 J
14.2
1.05 J
3.85
5.93
2.72 J
2.82 J
0.868 J
<0.181
1.69 J
1.68 J
<0.181
8.11
280
3,500
Tetrahydrofuran
<0.107
2.90
2.17
0.655 J
<0.107
3.85
1.85
1.93
0.840 J
<0.107
0.658 J
0.383 J
0.587 J
0.239 J
14,000
180,000
Toluene
0.976 J
6.70
1.06 J
7.15
5.90
2.14
0.667 J
0.550 J
1.16 J
1.13 J
0.573 J
1.17 J
1.07 J
1.15 J
35,000
440,000
Trichloroethene
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
<0.199
14
180
Trichlorofluoromethane
2.54 J
<0.130
1.75 J
1.76 J
1.57 J
1.83 J
1.52 J
1.48 J
1.62 J
1.84 J
1.30 J
1.61 J
1.40 J
1.40 J
NE
NE
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
<0.561
<0.561
<0.561
<0.561
1.32 J
<0.561
<0.561
<0.561
<0.561
<0.561
<0.561
<0.561
<0.561
<0.561
35,000
440,000
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
0.531 J
1.81 J
<0.110
5.51
3.21
0.880 J
1.50 J
0.890 J
22.6
0.796 J
0.762 J
0.919 J
0.939 J
1.40 J
420
5,300
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
<0.236
0.890 J
<0.236
1.15 J
0.614 J
<0.236
0.447 J
<0.236
8.43
<0.236
<0.236
<0.236
<0.236
<0.236
420
5,300
Vinyl acetate
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
<0.224
1,400
18,000
o-Xylene
<0.157
1.43 J
0.378 J
5.06
3.55
1.71 J
0.412 J
<0.157
0.630 J
0.439 J
<0.157
0.369 J
1.14 J
1.20 J
700
8,800
m&p-Xylene
0.634 J
3.47 J
0.829 J
10.1
7.06
3.05 J
<0.217
<0.217
<0.217
<0.217
<0.217
<0.217
<0.217
<0.217
700
8,800
Xylene (total)
0.634 J
4.90 J
1.21 J
15.2
10.6
4.76 J
0.412 J
<0.157
0.630 J
0.439 J
<0.157
0.369 J
1.14 J
1.20 J
700
8,800
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Sub -Slab & Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated January 2023.
Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (pg/m3).
Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).
Laboratory analytical method is shown in parentheses.
Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the above table.
Bold values exceed the DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSL.
Underlined values exceed the DWM Non -Residential SGSL.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; NE = not established
B = Analyte detected in blank.
J = Estimated concentration that is above the laboratory MDL but below the laboratory reporting limit
https:Hharthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/White Point Partners (WPP)/WPP-015 Yancey Road/Brownfields/EMP/Data Tables Table 3 (Page 2 of 2)
2/27/2023 Hart & Hickman, PC

wf
Af
SITE •�� .,- �+ �� '�,.� � -
�, a a • 4w .
- Vel
- t t-•• � ,�.� • Syr ; / ~l
'L , �nr� Meer->� ' � r•` ! ` . - 11 = •y ; � ,,�,`•.� �_ - �.
r, L_ � � J a• �L . P'wer.«Hi
CopyrigMt�OO 2013 National Geographic Soeiety,!i=cubed
y:
TITLE
0 2,000 4,000 SITE LOCATION MAP
N SCALE IN FEET PROJECT ADMIRATION HOSIERY MILLS
YANCEY ROAD, S. TRYON STREET &
E. PETERSON DRIVE
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
2923 South Tryon Street - Suite 100
CHARLOTTE WEST, NORTH CAROLINA2013 hart 10%w hickman Charlotte, North Carolina28203
CHARLOTTE EAST, NORTH CAROLINA2013 Livens #C-I 69/#C-245Geoo
SMARTER EP7V[R4NfV1ENTAL 54LLlTf4N5 License # C-1269 / # C-245 Geology
QUADRANGLE DATE: 3-29-21 REVISION NO: 0
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) rJOB NO: WPP-015 FIGURE NO: 1

)-4304 S. TRYON STREET)_
ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT CO.
(351 ORCHARD CIRCLE)
. {� �'W,
4 S. TRYON
S. TRYON
ES &ROSES (7008 LOSO COMMONS WAY) _®
I
S. TRYON STREET)
RESIDENTIAL
FORMER RESIDENCE
(4201 S. TRYON STREET)
FORMER RESIDENCE
SG-1 (351 E. PETERSON STREE) I
TMW-1 FORMER RESIDENCE
RESIDENTIAL (335 E. PETERSON DRIVE
APARTMENT COMPLEX
(UNDER CONSTRUCTION) 1
(4320 YANCEY ROAD)
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
(4301 YANCEY ROAD)
i
91/'"'
A OLDE MECKLENBURG BRE
✓� (4150 YANCEY ROAD
1ULTI-OCCUPANT
MERCIAL PROPEI
SOUTHSIDE DRD
e
® A
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PARCELBOUNDARY
— — -
SURFACE WATER FEATURE
PROPOSE BUILDING FOOTPRINT
®
APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF BASEMENT
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE LOCATION (10/2022)
COMPOSITE SOIL SAMPLE AREA (10/2022)
®
SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION (11/2022)
SOIL ALIQUOT SAMPLE LOCATION (10/2022)
®
SUB -SLAB VAPOR SAMPLE LOCATION (11/2022)
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE LOCATION (12/2021)
®
SUB -SLAB VAPOR SAMPLE LOCATION (12/2021)
NOTES:
1. PARCEL DATA OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS, 2022. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS (2020).
P
1� 1•�T.
APPROXIMATE
0 150 300
mommimi
SCALE IN FEET
TITLE
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
ADMIRATION HOSIERY MILL
YANCEY ROAD, S. TRYON STREET &
E. PETERSON DRIVE
CHARLOTTE NORTH CAROLINA
r;
• 2923 South Tryon Street -Suite 100
hart h i c k m a n Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p)704-586-0373(f
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
u
DATE: 4-11-23 REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. WPP-015 FIGURE NO. 3

Appendix A
Site Plan/Grading Plan
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

I �
0 I
41
S. Tryon Street �X o
� xr I
^ 80' PUBLIC R/W
APPROXIMATE R/W �(NO R/W TAKING DEED FOUND OR PROVIDED)
715.60+ "-..A
CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE �hg1 v 1 > S� CONCRETE CONCRETE 712.66 ^ M--(;QNCRETE �099
713.85 7, q•, g 71 ¢ 87 715.29 715-64 715-90 1 S 715 80 715.46 715.08 714-43 713.84 713.4D 711"OS 710.29 X �, 708 83
X x / x ENTRANCE x ENTRANCE x ENTRANCE X ENTRANCE x ENTRANCE X ` ENTRANCE X x x ENTRANCE ac a� x o9 x x 708.53
713.43X x713.7� 714-52x / 3 715.16x 715.48X 715J1X >475 �s� h5-40 715.24 \ 714.69x 713. 7132� X71z.3D \ x 711.87 X711 33 ` \ x710.76 709:89X�Jy� (\ x708.42 X 708.10
\ \ r " , X 709.33 \
X 711.80 \ X 710.40 \ x 708.61
/ \ \
711.05 \ \
71182X - 1-1 CONCRETE MEDIAN 715.78 71623 \ 715\ 13.73 CONCRETE MEDIAN 712.73 712.42 O 11.9s 40' DEED SETBACK 710.30 709'4� IN °0433 \ CONCRETE 1MEDIAN
713.83 *715.18 \ *716 no 716.03 715.90 715.69 714-39 713.48 711.9.3 71t.t4 IN 704.27 708-87
\ 20' BUILD -TO ZONE _ �: d�2i�S3 /� EgilOVE EXISTING � RIM:704.15
�rJ.��'d�9i�4
SSMH REMOVE EXIST-ING / SSMH --- - SSMH / y SSMH
\ REMOVE EXISTING RIM:715.94 CURB CU
CURB CUT OUT:708.39 CURB CUT $TERR x x x A x
\ PROPERTY LINE REMOVE EX� RflVG SOUTH-TRYON STREET � � / � _ � 7D8-54
TERR. 710.23 709•28 {) 8"TERR.
\ \ � CURB CUT x1 / / / 711.70 / / 71t.°o 20' BUILD -TO ZONE (MH TO MH: 355.5't)
713.35 1 95 714.fi4 71527 71�-�� 24' ZONING SEA CK 715.21 / /14.56 / 713,78 / 712.89 711.67,E X711.31 J /tu.38 � 70 ( X70B.24
X X� x � 715.53 TC - ,< 716-00 TC X X X X
713.75 x ONCRETE X71 ¢'77 716.D3 R� s-716.34 TC- SOUTH T RY O N ST. 7,5-5D B� x x 716.00 TC CONCR E - CONCRETE CONCRETE X 9.4> X 708.69
TRANCE 715.03 715.29 TCrc 7 5 63 5.9a� ! �� S 56 71 4. 6 714s0 Bc 71 a.1s �NTRAN E 714.U0 TC3.59 713.30 712-as I ENTRANCE �11 03 ENTRA CE \
713.88 �: 15.07 TC 714.79 BC 715.84 BC ■ 715.94 TC 713.50 BC
714.53 R„6 00 TC3 715.76 716.06 716.25 716.18 TC 7 .09 TC 715 ] 715.17 TC 1 04 71 20 713.Rn 713-4 X 712 54 S N
SIDEW LK 7 57 BC S a� 715.99 C 71 r;AO TC 716.A0 TC 716.29 TC 715.52 TC �14.A2 TC 713.82 TC 713AD I C 712.00 TC SIDEWALK 711.O0 TC 710.00 TC I 6y
713,96)F-�= �• s 7 716.13 - 7 - 7t 5.686C- �.�, 3 7t 2 713.a 710,42
-i�iri 714.50 BC 715.66 TC 15-SG Dr, - 715.9° BC 715.02 BC 714.42 BC 713.32 BC 712s0 B 111.60 e� 10.60 BC D9.50 BC 00 09
715.42 TC[01 ❑ [0]716.28 TC 716.21 TC / I / x R / �--)� \ �-k1p� I
7111
^4 ,. / 's
714 X 715.40 16.10 I# 716' E� /." 716.58 I?_' ?, 715'-0" / I/ 710-6 I
713.0 000"' b�
11 716.7 716.53 5 7 4. 7119 711-4 711.5
719.98 715'-6 t 716' 9" - \
715. 716.40_ \ 14.WFG 0 \ / 7097 SIDEWALK \
,9- N71665 I
- - - - - _ 714.72 ,715.81 _ /- - C , 715.91 5.3 715.56 715. 9 - - - - \ / Jo <709.5 709- 2 I
716.25 719.98 719.91 TS 719.90 TS >, fO Ctvv 7
YFFE - 719.90 TS 719.90 TS 718.81 1 ---=----J- --�- ICI--- ---- I
FFE 715.00 FFr F 15.83 716.11 BS 716.40 BS FFE 718.77 TS 719.90 TS nl 715.91 BS 715.56BS 1719.9D TS FFE x-, S+ 7D9-9(7) 6.5" RISER6 7" RISERS SERS 7zo 716.58 BS 716.40 BS FFE FFF FFE (8) 6" RISER t20 (8) 6.5" RISERS 18.9E i „6.6tzo O 711$1 no zo 716.256S zo �, 5 lA ALT S1 16,9 1D 1 ,6 X
15.40 BS 719.98 719.98 x (4) 6.75" RISERS (6) 6.75" RISERS 71998 x 71119
/158 16� 1e9 7• 71998 176 72-774 -176 071180 ?,x76T772.3- - - - - - - - - - -
Lz
tb
r REQUIRED SCREEN SHRUBS
77CI'- I" 7 10 7 2-4 715.00 °;,� NK 709 I I PER TOD-NC, TYP.
x> !20'_0�� PAMP �g 6.33'Y, 7 "' t0"may RAMP nN ,1. a,/, v i' - •3- 1 715 w 7°9-B X
a 6 ii - �\ 7. 09.8 • 709. 7
11 4 ELE':-7,1: �, _ = Fv .r 17' ,=rlt F'.'Tkll)A -+ 3 16 71 716' l C C C C C C C C C C C C C c� C C o -, �' 16' ZONING SETBACK
71a.00
>79 ❑ ° ! ® - z x717. O ECTkICA fp J� n \ I \ I s o o x� cn
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SIDEWALK I v ❑ / I I '�2c_.
c '� 17 0 7t71o.7x 134 ��• X x �• x 7108 4- TEMPORARY PHASE 01
713.2 Iy!
1 11B X$1 2p 7c ^� 6� k 5 RASH2� 1 - + N 711-8 24 ,° N LEASING / POP-UP RETAIL
F ^ 151 153 155 157 ® �. 173 175 15- �C�16 1 \ I Xw \ \ 12' X 56'
❑ M+ I± I 1CX716-
1G - 123
1142 141
'o
1 a - N / ,\ 77g 716.00 FG C \ I + I
/ 06 >7654 X f l IBC
>73 1e 71a,5 7702 /
X
713.00 N ❑ 1 E 71\��
k� 140 M' / I 59 8 X 8 z 121 \ l-,
Ix711.1 26 I X� o a N I l
1 ^ _ 139 J 7 'v�C C� V \ C 7\ x711 7 \ 71 - k7t0-almry a'
X INTERIORuCOURTYAR RAMP _ _ \ x 17 C X 5� 1 2. \ "0'1 71 3 �� I 16' ZONING SETBACK
�Ir ❑k a �� �RIUOSE,D MULTI-FAM LY ❑ POOL COURTYARD z 16s' - -� NR� -x�10 ��
�A k 1N$p L_�_. R 712- mm
>72 712.00 I - \ 119 \ �y Q /
J 7 82 35' DEED SETBACK,
718 -2 +
FFt
M x 1GALT a +7tB-9° 7� 13 C 1 I c.
' + 8. 778. S1 - - \ - - - - - - - - - - - - X X I
ti 7
z1z 133 51 $l Sl 2F } A�-Lsc'UI LL�,1 117 717 0 x C
Ic
p. 1 L7 E- E -I E MIX. A • � � �
x V - \ 27 ^' / o
I I I < I 131 129 127 1 B ❑ ° \ I �./ \ I
^ I xo XJ mn
I I1 \I I I♦, /-I -- • --- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- O A \ZiZ
115
36 J ® x71a'a 71g 1A � o ry F 718 C\ II o
ELE�-TEKA_ 1935 X +1^ DO ��z10 mm
T IR B 71 718 / LL ❑ PROPOSED SIDEWALK SLOPES \ z
FFE 719 26 C - m
tz sz w u 7 ,� TO BE UNDER 5% IN ORDER TO
nq I
712.0 IF,' 1 - I 719.t6 � AVOID RAMPS. SLOPED WALKWAY
712.54 7 X a 1 A 4719.82 + S C 4.75 % OR LESS mm
712.601i, E-T�,':= „s / ' �i9 S TEMPORARY PARKING, GRAVEL / m m ro
IX 1 x 5 '�s 91 03 77,85 \ 00 C oa.D LOT WITH WHEEL STOPS, TYP. -i\
712.00 X 865 ,11_-' ❑ / \ x m
X7 �>> \, ,e "1Z 1 71s��6 0 • C \ EXISTING TREES 169 TEMPORARY SPACES TOTAL �` N
'119 A ,fl .53 ^ 719.83 19.717
I FFE 7 IA 2E ` 2E / o❑ 1C � v aN'�9 /71 5X \ xv 720'-0„ /zest \ " I FFE FFE FFE _If' N 719.62 C m
1 �zzxz
FM
' 16 132 7 tzz 1 z2 7zz 128 - �zz F22 26 1C +71 ?Etr54+ 719.98�
�S\ x 124 1 7» G ! >`0 71s:70
713.00 714.28� 776,2 716,2x 222 ',; 1 'P �/ E =c-R X ¢ \ ryp, X720-41 x"
720.13 � \ 1 720.00
7 715.1 VCIT_R FARKI N':720
F`AkKIH,' �L�K
4 Sk �x �4"OAK r K ° �X72o \ 714 6 m m11
_ x 715.7 _
" \ 70 706-6 7073 .0- ' `! �1�4.7 • N� / 'S8x \ 719 718.3 - X �Z
TTT"" T -x 711.19 71 3. 713.98 10 • • 7211' - tl" ,L 6°' 24"OAK '� i 18. ,
P �� x / , C\ x IR-\25.00
9- Q, 72tP32 +7 1 FI Fv, �FFt Y, x719.fi 1 - 0.2
CONCRET CONCRET 71a.o7 Ex 7ts.z5 EX \ 9 - / 715.6 r3 mm
0.3' 705 2 709 7 1.1 A p 721.00 C I \ r'
/ ti / zz \ \ 25 DEED SETBACK
x7Oz.8 3' FFE k nE-r -LE- - ------ ---- � N
712.00 ' • _ m ~co 0 h ti �z1 22 " 7 Idl EL-_✓ R.. L-7. \ / C - a X f
L-j
L1' F�'AMF' LIN _ J
711.00 7 �28 I • n V x719.50
\ lI 7 99p
i. / 766 o7_0 \ k X
5 722
722.00
720.98 1 F=rFA X 2036 +o7031 714.81 RIMS 714.99 20, 721.00 21.0
703.6,
\ I I
2.0" FFE FFE 720 6 \ 720.70 no 723.41 TW / TS TEMPORARY
X703-3 FFE zz.�o zz.�o x FFE 719.77 BS 716.2 �
715.14 EX I ]zi X 1.4 \ 21
_ , �z1 '�2, ❑ (7)6.z5°RISERS � � X1B.7 � '� ��/ PHASE 01 OFFICE
703 fi 703.50 703.50 '' 714.95 BS 18 83
FFE- 0 715.�5 FFE= 71 J.00 TS jjg 55 I t 87 Tkr- 723.00 •
f _ F Y,I\G DECY, � 8 \ 719 6 � rn ro , '
x 0) 710.4a x� 63 720.0 7zz s9 723 OAK 72 .77 �z 1z 1 2 X 56
4 704. 7 o s's + A v CONCRETE x 72D-O9 72 •1 722.68 720 93 719 98 �I1I rI--11
UNKNOWN/ 4+704 L� 1�1 0.7 ' EN \ f zo x70 I '
UNDERGROU D ro 7zz 68 cN . s ? w z z
1 D-oD
UTILITY o 1 I 722 7zza5 rw 72 71s.77 Bw x722 • 2t.57 20. 719.71
• � L 723.O6TW \ f 30 DEED SETBACK
/ 703.25BW J 722.52 f 722.65 722.76 7z1'- 719.89BW 723.DSTW I 2 l �mm 9' -ETut mm I
722.52 722.56 722.99 TC 723.32 C7 91 0 ut in
CONCRETE BS + 722.67 - / �
7U5 714.06 BW I 3 _ " ' oX 1
I I 1720.59 721.59 X 88 - 722.51 TW O 2.8' CONCR I rn u
713.32 TS .N 2.50 TC 723.00 TC p 20 I a°
705. 703.09 BS 71 7 2,35 719.77 BW X
1' 722.41 TC 1722.00 BC 22 g,02,2.51' BC 722-1 1 21.3
.✓ , - 719.68 TW - 720.46 TC 721.46 TC 721.96 BC % 721.91 RIM: 722.79 BC m o BL
7D4.2X X I X / 713.32 TS / BW 71,5 71 4. x� 720.00 EP-721.00 EP ,,�. 722.00 EP -a + •56 723.00 72290 °' \ -21 N27.
722.46 TC 722.06 722.11 723.29 TC 11 ,
713.82 TW to 8'
p 1"702.91 RIM 702.91 RIM 702.91 RIM o N i2- ¢8 N 723 LOADING / 723.3,E % ,i7.°� \ O 2 m
7U3 717.68 BW r N 1
m - f'v^ > f WOOD SHED
IJJ. 713.00 BC PROPOSED O F F 1719.68 TW , • I r o +- - ---- -� �--84 ----� j I� + �/ �=pI 22 FoorPRlNr= 3.4' \ Zo -
A 703 713 4-"TREE `� / 720.52 720 3 721-05 722.00 BC:63 722.54 BC 722.65 BC �7 N x>2?-8> 723.00 f�l D FS HAR F X23.4 p Z� , 3 SQ F�, 1z �, •
I IIw� / \ BIKE RACKS 714-80 a
• 9 + F+ B(EDEE) � 72363 72400B��•�� DROP-OFF � 7 1 13X0> �\TEMPORARY
71,-7z3.50 TC > 723.26 _ V,=7 $'rn > , o C_95'_C•-CE_L SP2 T2 723.00 TC / EX 723 00 BC S I \ > 74 95 24. ' mm 1TC7 PHASE 01 OFFICE
,�Q1 p. •�, l ,I I I I PO YJ111HA -Ah723.5 \X 2 �/ ZO
I II 703.32 BW / o 1 1 II I Iv5Jl ATION R-17,Sc MIN, Al' 722.506C 723.58 723.5 30 'S \ \ Az 24' v 56'
ea ,..... 709.76 TW ,n • m N \ 712.77 BS J 15.25 -720. T T o\ 'F:-F ,I6F O' S A BFNFA-H O 38X / •I X>? 72 720.57 D� I '\
�708.02 BC EX 708, 703.48 BW 713.22 TW 712.05 _ 717.37 BW wX 20.7 N sl ':::oNIT1-N-D SPA C- O. L4 �, ° ° RETE GATE \/ nr�
0 + 3 / 71z.72 BW \ 7, .42 O 21 RETAI N I N 23.42 '� E" X 4.7x rY >? 723 58 N 31 2 MOTOR mm
09148 o U 718.37 TW TREE TO REMAIN f \ 724.55 � � `3 723.53 O� BL HT.= xj x �
.pI �} 709.26T ULCH \ 1-ST Y BRIL,n
> P X x� 2' 3 •7't J w O
X7B5- / 703.936W , I I 1 OR 2 POTENTIAL 1s•9' 21 0' �� F
7o5.D 4'fi • Jos.l6rc . FOOTPRINT 6,558 SO-
10 > �708.98BC - >> N CONCRETE TANK TANK TA K ® 18"OAK > 9 1.5 TOR BR K N z N
00 \ °9, !� P o 712.63TW m BLD. HT. - - 00 T Ln •
718.37 TW - _ 9 25 DEED SETBACK
7 .18 s p m x f TRANSFORMERS- TBD EXPANDED D x724's3 D 1/2'EIR > 3.73x 12-2' 1,254 s• m
rn 712.13 BW 20.2't of
71z.o5EP 714.58 BW r ram,
90¢ ° ° ° I ° �.� DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE 10 '�' z �° ^' ° / I - V�
4'TRE \ 713.50 CONTROL BOX m 7258X x>Z4 97 x REQUIRED SCREEN
+m W. \ �, W 721.72 EX 1 7 > ZS7 $ 2 K m
7D Dry \ 1 \ a r I SERVICE AND LOADING 8 N = N „ > + Jo J
18 EE \ \ 711.52 - EXISTING LOADING TO REMAIN \ TYP.SHRUBS PER TOD-NC
IKE RAC - 1 9 23. w 1"E] - 60 OAK ONG. A�
x 70 / / \ � -+ � - 724.3 - 7 ss o
\ �\ \ / 711.10 BC 12.01 III 726.2 \ 1 m0 X
I EXISTING PARKING TO REMAIN a"TREE >�5 7 2' 12 --�p� X I
1 )>
6 PACES / 714.60 BW eLocK I 30 DEED SETBACK
z ,
AL / 7' 0 �715.6�W 4' EE EXISTING BREWERY TREE TO REMAIN I 237 \ X mrn
& 6> • Og 711.53 BC EX 1 .1 >7�
/ 712.12BS 715.1 N 722.12 BW /� i 726 ( 722.1x� I j °N m �n �� •
\ \ - 03
�1525 I O 75.10 .12 OMB \ •
m SIDE LK V • 72 lvJ I
R I
>D9 L OLHANG - J y �I 15.D8 714.00 BW -
>O87SX->ix I
b, A51# / \ I \ 15.14 7152 4„T E 2.12 N • \ \x
1212
/�\ /\\ /I �1 \ x7 L _ N c 7�4.38 EX W 2,'PIN
\3a"CED \ I N \ In-0i
\ k>°CBI / / .F Y\ >,ORFF / \//\ I \ _ _ �72ss - - ...L ,t724.8� - -x �� 722.2
mc7
4 x711. \ u 714-5 I \ 725.9X I724.9 X-
721.8 mZO
\ S, 1�2INIR 723.4 i nm
J J 1
,0S 3 \ \>0\24 \ />'''o�' o p 1 I N >70
mm
6
_ _ r � I � x�
k>0,> \ \ \ \ /7113] \ w J I
N N W O I J
`FK I / 711 B I I 716.10 BW �
I
\ \ X>o\> -� 09 \ /i o, I 721.80 BW I I xX X, xx
9k I / / 0 4,.OAK I I x j I
A 1- tao
\ FN V 71J8 X721.0 72122 O mrn o0
\T�\ 24 \ ' 8 \ 12 UI�ST /D ON -STREET '4 9 -
\S PAR
KkP� SPACES FOR / LF 5.14' I
\ \ PMVE RUSE PER 2016 PER e• �/ �1X2 71 g
\ APPROVED REZONING F I I ® I
\ ISSIBLL PACES ; >'3,3 I \ 715.45 EX
(PERM N
/ />'z'9 7151x x . EXISTING PARKING I I
goo�o �T0863 \ go 4�Re£\la F 1y,k TO REMAIN
R 116 :N REVISED PARKING I
\ >7 7
\ >7z, j \ X>'3s6 - SSMH 6 ` J / I 716.96 BW I I
\ >77.4 \ o� a : > s8 f xx721, 722.62 TW
>,2\ J >769 Z Faoes / I ��0.9 721.62 BW I
\ \ r
/ >7,. l 722.62 TW KEEP EXISTING I
x>'S48 4 \� �1s 9 I•W CURB AND GUTTER
X I
\ / 718.56 E Fry \
\ cF >zp 7 I
\ y�7>o \ x ;>"s8 ,
/ F
\ \-98 \ \�- X \
>7g P°78
0,14) k \
\ \ R 0
\ \ x >,y� 4 4k \ (NOT USED)EIPw1�2-MR(USED)
\ >"'0 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN��
\ A� STRIPED CROSSWALK - TIE TO
\ >782 EXISTING OMB SIDEWALK
\ �SIGNAGE FOR SERVICE AND, \ Y
LOADING / NO OUTLET
20 UNSTRIPED ON -STREET
aA,,F X y PARKING SPACES FOR OMB PER
2°80 2016 APPROVED REZONING
(PERMISSIBLE SPACES) s
18
P.O.C./ .
NGS MONUMENT "KIMBRELLRELL" x
NO ORD HAD 83(2M 0
COORDINATES
N:525,718.49' O
E:1,439,499.23'
ELEV:730.38'd � O /
OMB MULTI-
PN 1021117 08.03.2022
FAMILY • CHARLOTTE
NC •
GRADING PLAN
O w
SCALE: 1 "=30'
0 15, 30' 45' 75'
8/2/2022 1:34 PM CWEAVER NA 2021\1021117\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\1021117 PLN GRAD.DWG

I �
0 I
41
S. Tryon Street �X o
� xr I
^ 80' PUBLIC R/W
APPROXIMATE R/W �(NO R/W TAKING DEED FOUND OR PROVIDED)
715.60+ "-..A
CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE �hg1 v 1 > S� CONCRETE CONCRETE 712.66 ^ M--(;QNCRETE �099
713.85 7, q•, g 71 ¢ 87 715.29 715-64 715-90 1 S 715 80 715.46 715.08 714-43 713.84 713.4D 711"OS 710.29 X �, 708 83
X x / x ENTRANCE x ENTRANCE x ENTRANCE X ENTRANCE x ENTRANCE X ` ENTRANCE X x x ENTRANCE ac a� x o9 x x 708.53
713.43X x713.7� 714-52x / 3 715.16x 715.48X 715J1X >475 �s� h5-40 715.24 \ 714.69x 713. 7132� X71z.3D \ x 711.87 X711 33 ` \ x710.76 709:89X�Jy� (\ x708.42 X 708.10
\ \ r " , X 709.33 \
X 711.80 \ X 710.40 \ x 708.61
/ \ \
711.05 \ \
71182X - 1-1 CONCRETE MEDIAN 715.78 71623 \ 715\ 13.73 CONCRETE MEDIAN 712.73 712.42 O 11.9s 40' DEED SETBACK 710.30 709'4� IN °0433 \ CONCRETE 1MEDIAN
713.83 *715.18 \ *716 no 716.03 715.90 715.69 714-39 713.48 711.9.3 71t.t4 IN 704.27 708-87
\ 20' BUILD -TO ZONE _ �: d�2i�S3 /� EgilOVE EXISTING � RIM:704.15
�rJ.��'d�9i�4
SSMH REMOVE EXIST-ING / SSMH --- - SSMH / y SSMH
\ REMOVE EXISTING RIM:715.94 CURB CU
CURB CUT OUT:708.39 CURB CUT $TERR x x x A x
\ PROPERTY LINE REMOVE EX� RflVG SOUTH-TRYON STREET � � / � _ � 7D8-54
TERR. 710.23 709•28 {) 8"TERR.
\ \ � CURB CUT x1 / / / 711.70 / / 71t.°o 20' BUILD -TO ZONE (MH TO MH: 355.5't)
713.35 1 95 714.fi4 71527 71�-�� 24' ZONING SEA CK 715.21 / /14.56 / 713,78 / 712.89 711.67,E X711.31 J /tu.38 � 70 ( X70B.24
X X� x � 715.53 TC - ,< 716-00 TC X X X X
713.75 x ONCRETE X71 ¢'77 716.D3 R� s-716.34 TC- SOUTH T RY O N ST. 7,5-5D B� x x 716.00 TC CONCR E - CONCRETE CONCRETE X 9.4> X 708.69
TRANCE 715.03 715.29 TCrc 7 5 63 5.9a� ! �� S 56 71 4. 6 714s0 Bc 71 a.1s �NTRAN E 714.U0 TC3.59 713.30 712-as I ENTRANCE �11 03 ENTRA CE \
713.88 �: 15.07 TC 714.79 BC 715.84 BC ■ 715.94 TC 713.50 BC
714.53 R„6 00 TC3 715.76 716.06 716.25 716.18 TC 7 .09 TC 715 ] 715.17 TC 1 04 71 20 713.Rn 713-4 X 712 54 S N
SIDEW LK 7 57 BC S a� 715.99 C 71 r;AO TC 716.A0 TC 716.29 TC 715.52 TC �14.A2 TC 713.82 TC 713AD I C 712.00 TC SIDEWALK 711.O0 TC 710.00 TC I 6y
713,96)F-�= �• s 7 716.13 - 7 - 7t 5.686C- �.�, 3 7t 2 713.a 710,42
-i�iri 714.50 BC 715.66 TC 15-SG Dr, - 715.9° BC 715.02 BC 714.42 BC 713.32 BC 712s0 B 111.60 e� 10.60 BC D9.50 BC 00 09
715.42 TC[01 ❑ [0]716.28 TC 716.21 TC / I / x R / �--)� \ �-k1p� I
7111
^4 ,. / 's
714 X 715.40 16.10 I# 716' E� /." 716.58 I?_' ?, 715'-0" / I/ 710-6 I
713.0 000"' b�
11 716.7 716.53 5 7 4. 7119 711-4 711.5
719.98 715'-6 t 716' 9" - \
715. 716.40_ \ 14.WFG 0 \ / 7097 SIDEWALK \
,9- N71665 I
- - - - - _ 714.72 ,715.81 _ /- - C , 715.91 5.3 715.56 715. 9 - - - - \ / Jo <709.5 709- 2 I
716.25 719.98 719.91 TS 719.90 TS >, fO Ctvv 7
YFFE - 719.90 TS 719.90 TS 718.81 1 ---=----J- --�- ICI--- ---- I
FFE 715.00 FFr F 15.83 716.11 BS 716.40 BS FFE 718.77 TS 719.90 TS nl 715.91 BS 715.56BS 1719.9D TS FFE x-, S+ 7D9-9(7) 6.5" RISER6 7" RISERS SERS 7zo 716.58 BS 716.40 BS FFE FFF FFE (8) 6" RISER t20 (8) 6.5" RISERS 18.9E i „6.6tzo O 711$1 no zo 716.256S zo �, 5 lA ALT S1 16,9 1D 1 ,6 X
15.40 BS 719.98 719.98 x (4) 6.75" RISERS (6) 6.75" RISERS 71998 x 71119
/158 16� 1e9 7• 71998 176 72-774 -176 071180 ?,x76T772.3- - - - - - - - - - -
Lz
tb
r REQUIRED SCREEN SHRUBS
77CI'- I" 7 10 7 2-4 715.00 °;,� NK 709 I I PER TOD-NC, TYP.
x> !20'_0�� PAMP �g 6.33'Y, 7 "' t0"may RAMP nN ,1. a,/, v i' - •3- 1 715 w 7°9-B X
a 6 ii - �\ 7. 09.8 • 709. 7
11 4 ELE':-7,1: �, _ = Fv .r 17' ,=rlt F'.'Tkll)A -+ 3 16 71 716' l C C C C C C C C C C C C C c� C C o -, �' 16' ZONING SETBACK
71a.00
>79 ❑ ° ! ® - z x717. O ECTkICA fp J� n \ I \ I s o o x� cn
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SIDEWALK I v ❑ / I I '�2c_.
c '� 17 0 7t71o.7x 134 ��• X x �• x 7108 4- TEMPORARY PHASE 01
713.2 Iy!
1 11B X$1 2p 7c ^� 6� k 5 RASH2� 1 - + N 711-8 24 ,° N LEASING / POP-UP RETAIL
F ^ 151 153 155 157 ® �. 173 175 15- �C�16 1 \ I Xw \ \ 12' X 56'
❑ M+ I± I 1CX716-
1G - 123
1142 141
'o
1 a - N / ,\ 77g 716.00 FG C \ I + I
/ 06 >7654 X f l IBC
>73 1e 71a,5 7702 /
X
713.00 N ❑ 1 E 71\��
k� 140 M' / I 59 8 X 8 z 121 \ l-,
Ix711.1 26 I X� o a N I l
1 ^ _ 139 J 7 'v�C C� V \ C 7\ x711 7 \ 71 - k7t0-almry a'
X INTERIORuCOURTYAR RAMP _ _ \ x 17 C X 5� 1 2. \ "0'1 71 3 �� I 16' ZONING SETBACK
�Ir ❑k a �� �RIUOSE,D MULTI-FAM LY ❑ POOL COURTYARD z 16s' - -� NR� -x�10 ��
�A k 1N$p L_�_. R 712- mm
>72 712.00 I - \ 119 \ �y Q /
J 7 82 35' DEED SETBACK,
718 -2 +
FFt
M x 1GALT a +7tB-9° 7� 13 C 1 I c.
' + 8. 778. S1 - - \ - - - - - - - - - - - - X X I
ti 7
z1z 133 51 $l Sl 2F } A�-Lsc'UI LL�,1 117 717 0 x C
Ic
p. 1 L7 E- E -I E MIX. A • � � �
x V - \ 27 ^' / o
I I I < I 131 129 127 1 B ❑ ° \ I �./ \ I
^ I xo XJ mn
I I1 \I I I♦, /-I -- • --- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- O A \ZiZ
115
36 J ® x71a'a 71g 1A � o ry F 718 C\ II o
ELE�-TEKA_ 1935 X +1^ DO ��z10 mm
T IR B 71 718 / LL ❑ PROPOSED SIDEWALK SLOPES \ z
FFE 719 26 C - m
tz sz w u 7 ,� TO BE UNDER 5% IN ORDER TO
nq I
712.0 IF,' 1 - I 719.t6 � AVOID RAMPS. SLOPED WALKWAY
712.54 7 X a 1 A 4719.82 + S C 4.75 % OR LESS mm
712.601i, E-T�,':= „s / ' �i9 S TEMPORARY PARKING, GRAVEL / m m ro
IX 1 x 5 '�s 91 03 77,85 \ 00 C oa.D LOT WITH WHEEL STOPS, TYP. -i\
712.00 X 865 ,11_-' ❑ / \ x m
X7 �>> \, ,e "1Z 1 71s��6 0 • C \ EXISTING TREES 169 TEMPORARY SPACES TOTAL �` N
'119 A ,fl .53 ^ 719.83 19.717
I FFE 7 IA 2E ` 2E / o❑ 1C � v aN'�9 /71 5X \ xv 720'-0„ /zest \ " I FFE FFE FFE _If' N 719.62 C m
1 �zzxz
FM
' 16 132 7 tzz 1 z2 7zz 128 - �zz F22 26 1C +71 ?Etr54+ 719.98�
�S\ x 124 1 7» G ! >`0 71s:70
713.00 714.28� 776,2 716,2x 222 ',; 1 'P �/ E =c-R X ¢ \ ryp, X720-41 x"
720.13 � \ 1 720.00
7 715.1 VCIT_R FARKI N':720
F`AkKIH,' �L�K
4 Sk �x �4"OAK r K ° �X72o \ 714 6 m m11
_ x 715.7 _
" \ 70 706-6 7073 .0- ' `! �1�4.7 • N� / 'S8x \ 719 718.3 - X �Z
TTT"" T -x 711.19 71 3. 713.98 10 • • 7211' - tl" ,L 6°' 24"OAK '� i 18. ,
P �� x / , C\ x IR-\25.00
9- Q, 72tP32 +7 1 FI Fv, �FFt Y, x719.fi 1 - 0.2
CONCRET CONCRET 71a.o7 Ex 7ts.z5 EX \ 9 - / 715.6 r3 mm
0.3' 705 2 709 7 1.1 A p 721.00 C I \ r'
/ ti / zz \ \ 25 DEED SETBACK
x7Oz.8 3' FFE k nE-r -LE- - ------ ---- � N
712.00 ' • _ m ~co 0 h ti �z1 22 " 7 Idl EL-_✓ R.. L-7. \ / C - a X f
L-j
L1' F�'AMF' LIN _ J
711.00 7 �28 I • n V x719.50
\ lI 7 99p
i. / 766 o7_0 \ k X
5 722
722.00
720.98 1 F=rFA X 2036 +o7031 714.81 RIMS 714.99 20, 721.00 21.0
703.6,
\ I I
2.0" FFE FFE 720 6 \ 720.70 no 723.41 TW / TS TEMPORARY
X703-3 FFE zz.�o zz.�o x FFE 719.77 BS 716.2 �
715.14 EX I ]zi X 1.4 \ 21
_ , �z1 '�2, ❑ (7)6.z5°RISERS � � X1B.7 � '� ��/ PHASE 01 OFFICE
703 fi 703.50 703.50 '' 714.95 BS 18 83
FFE- 0 715.�5 FFE= 71 J.00 TS jjg 55 I t 87 Tkr- 723.00 •
f _ F Y,I\G DECY, � 8 \ 719 6 � rn ro , '
x 0) 710.4a x� 63 720.0 7zz s9 723 OAK 72 .77 �z 1z 1 2 X 56
4 704. 7 o s's + A v CONCRETE x 72D-O9 72 •1 722.68 720 93 719 98 �I1I rI--11
UNKNOWN/ 4+704 L� 1�1 0.7 ' EN \ f zo x70 I '
UNDERGROU D ro 7zz 68 cN . s ? w z z
1 D-oD
UTILITY o 1 I 722 7zza5 rw 72 71s.77 Bw x722 • 2t.57 20. 719.71
• � L 723.O6TW \ f 30 DEED SETBACK
/ 703.25BW J 722.52 f 722.65 722.76 7z1'- 719.89BW 723.DSTW I 2 l �mm 9' -ETut mm I
722.52 722.56 722.99 TC 723.32 C7 91 0 ut in
CONCRETE BS + 722.67 - / �
7U5 714.06 BW I 3 _ " ' oX 1
I I 1720.59 721.59 X 88 - 722.51 TW O 2.8' CONCR I rn u
713.32 TS .N 2.50 TC 723.00 TC p 20 I a°
705. 703.09 BS 71 7 2,35 719.77 BW X
1' 722.41 TC 1722.00 BC 22 g,02,2.51' BC 722-1 1 21.3
.✓ , - 719.68 TW - 720.46 TC 721.46 TC 721.96 BC % 721.91 RIM: 722.79 BC m o BL
7D4.2X X I X / 713.32 TS / BW 71,5 71 4. x� 720.00 EP-721.00 EP ,,�. 722.00 EP -a + •56 723.00 72290 °' \ -21 N27.
722.46 TC 722.06 722.11 723.29 TC 11 ,
713.82 TW to 8'
p 1"702.91 RIM 702.91 RIM 702.91 RIM o N i2- ¢8 N 723 LOADING / 723.3,E % ,i7.°� \ O 2 m
7U3 717.68 BW r N 1
m - f'v^ > f WOOD SHED
IJJ. 713.00 BC PROPOSED O F F 1719.68 TW , • I r o +- - ---- -� �--84 ----� j I� + �/ �=pI 22 FoorPRlNr= 3.4' \ Zo -
A 703 713 4-"TREE `� / 720.52 720 3 721-05 722.00 BC:63 722.54 BC 722.65 BC �7 N x>2?-8> 723.00 f�l D FS HAR F X23.4 p Z� , 3 SQ F�, 1z �, •
I IIw� / \ BIKE RACKS 714-80 a
• 9 + F+ B(EDEE) � 72363 72400B��•�� DROP-OFF � 7 1 13X0> �\TEMPORARY
71,-7z3.50 TC > 723.26 _ V,=7 $'rn > , o C_95'_C•-CE_L SP2 T2 723.00 TC / EX 723 00 BC S I \ > 74 95 24. ' mm 1TC7 PHASE 01 OFFICE
,�Q1 p. •�, l ,I I I I PO YJ111HA -Ah723.5 \X 2 �/ ZO
I II 703.32 BW / o 1 1 II I Iv5Jl ATION R-17,Sc MIN, Al' 722.506C 723.58 723.5 30 'S \ \ Az 24' v 56'
ea ,..... 709.76 TW ,n • m N \ 712.77 BS J 15.25 -720. T T o\ 'F:-F ,I6F O' S A BFNFA-H O 38X / •I X>? 72 720.57 D� I '\
�708.02 BC EX 708, 703.48 BW 713.22 TW 712.05 _ 717.37 BW wX 20.7 N sl ':::oNIT1-N-D SPA C- O. L4 �, ° ° RETE GATE \/ nr�
0 + 3 / 71z.72 BW \ 7, .42 O 21 RETAI N I N 23.42 '� E" X 4.7x rY >? 723 58 N 31 2 MOTOR mm
09148 o U 718.37 TW TREE TO REMAIN f \ 724.55 � � `3 723.53 O� BL HT.= xj x �
.pI �} 709.26T ULCH \ 1-ST Y BRIL,n
> P X x� 2' 3 •7't J w O
X7B5- / 703.936W , I I 1 OR 2 POTENTIAL 1s•9' 21 0' �� F
7o5.D 4'fi • Jos.l6rc . FOOTPRINT 6,558 SO-
10 > �708.98BC - >> N CONCRETE TANK TANK TA K ® 18"OAK > 9 1.5 TOR BR K N z N
00 \ °9, !� P o 712.63TW m BLD. HT. - - 00 T Ln •
718.37 TW - _ 9 25 DEED SETBACK
7 .18 s p m x f TRANSFORMERS- TBD EXPANDED D x724's3 D 1/2'EIR > 3.73x 12-2' 1,254 s• m
rn 712.13 BW 20.2't of
71z.o5EP 714.58 BW r ram,
90¢ ° ° ° I ° �.� DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE 10 '�' z �° ^' ° / I - V�
4'TRE \ 713.50 CONTROL BOX m 7258X x>Z4 97 x REQUIRED SCREEN
+m W. \ �, W 721.72 EX 1 7 > ZS7 $ 2 K m
7D Dry \ 1 \ a r I SERVICE AND LOADING 8 N = N „ > + Jo J
18 EE \ \ 711.52 - EXISTING LOADING TO REMAIN \ TYP.SHRUBS PER TOD-NC
IKE RAC - 1 9 23. w 1"E] - 60 OAK ONG. A�
x 70 / / \ � -+ � - 724.3 - 7 ss o
\ �\ \ / 711.10 BC 12.01 III 726.2 \ 1 m0 X
I EXISTING PARKING TO REMAIN a"TREE >�5 7 2' 12 --�p� X I
1 )>
6 PACES / 714.60 BW eLocK I 30 DEED SETBACK
z ,
AL / 7' 0 �715.6�W 4' EE EXISTING BREWERY TREE TO REMAIN I 237 \ X mrn
& 6> • Og 711.53 BC EX 1 .1 >7�
/ 712.12BS 715.1 N 722.12 BW /� i 726 ( 722.1x� I j °N m �n �� •
\ \ - 03
�1525 I O 75.10 .12 OMB \ •
m SIDE LK V • 72 lvJ I
R I
>D9 L OLHANG - J y �I 15.D8 714.00 BW -
>O87SX->ix I
b, A51# / \ I \ 15.14 7152 4„T E 2.12 N • \ \x
1212
/�\ /\\ /I �1 \ x7 L _ N c 7�4.38 EX W 2,'PIN
\3a"CED \ I N \ In-0i
\ k>°CBI / / .F Y\ >,ORFF / \//\ I \ _ _ �72ss - - ...L ,t724.8� - -x �� 722.2
mc7
4 x711. \ u 714-5 I \ 725.9X I724.9 X-
721.8 mZO
\ S, 1�2INIR 723.4 i nm
J J 1
,0S 3 \ \>0\24 \ />'''o�' o p 1 I N >70
mm
6
_ _ r � I � x�
k>0,> \ \ \ \ /7113] \ w J I
N N W O I J
`FK I / 711 B I I 716.10 BW �
I
\ \ X>o\> -� 09 \ /i o, I 721.80 BW I I xX X, xx
9k I / / 0 4,.OAK I I x j I
A 1- tao
\ FN V 71J8 X721.0 72122 O mrn o0
\T�\ 24 \ ' 8 \ 12 UI�ST /D ON -STREET '4 9 -
\S PAR
KkP� SPACES FOR / LF 5.14' I
\ \ PMVE RUSE PER 2016 PER e• �/ �1X2 71 g
\ APPROVED REZONING F I I ® I
\ ISSIBLL PACES ; >'3,3 I \ 715.45 EX
(PERM N
/ />'z'9 7151x x . EXISTING PARKING I I
goo�o �T0863 \ go 4�Re£\la F 1y,k TO REMAIN
R 116 :N REVISED PARKING I
\ >7 7
\ >7z, j \ X>'3s6 - SSMH 6 ` J / I 716.96 BW I I
\ >77.4 \ o� a : > s8 f xx721, 722.62 TW
>,2\ J >769 Z Faoes / I ��0.9 721.62 BW I
\ \ r
/ >7,. l 722.62 TW KEEP EXISTING I
x>'S48 4 \� �1s 9 I•W CURB AND GUTTER
X I
\ / 718.56 E Fry \
\ cF >zp 7 I
\ y�7>o \ x ;>"s8 ,
/ F
\ \-98 \ \�- X \
>7g P°78
0,14) k \
\ \ R 0
\ \ x >,y� 4 4k \ (NOT USED)EIPw1�2-MR(USED)
\ >"'0 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN��
\ A� STRIPED CROSSWALK - TIE TO
\ >782 EXISTING OMB SIDEWALK
\ �SIGNAGE FOR SERVICE AND, \ Y
LOADING / NO OUTLET
20 UNSTRIPED ON -STREET
aA,,F X y PARKING SPACES FOR OMB PER
2°80 2016 APPROVED REZONING
(PERMISSIBLE SPACES) s
18
P.O.C./ .
NGS MONUMENT "KIMBRELLRELL" x
NO ORD HAD 83(2M 0
COORDINATES
N:525,718.49' O
E:1,439,499.23'
ELEV:730.38'd � O /
OMB MULTI-
PN 1021117 08.03.2022
FAMILY • CHARLOTTE
NC •
GRADING PLAN
O w
SCALE: 1 "=30'
0 15, 30' 45' 75'
8/2/2022 1:34 PM CWEAVER NA 2021\1021117\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\1021117 PLN GRAD.DWG

Appendix B
Cut/Fill Analysis
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Job: PN1021117_AGTEK
Units: Ft-CY
Wed Aug 3, 2022 16:16:33 Page 1
Volume Report
Subarade vs. Stripped
Area Volume Comp/Ratio Compact Export Change
Total Cut Fill OnGrade Cut Fill Cut Fill Cut Fill -Import Per.1 Ft
BLDG REGION 94,965 20,052 70,259 4,654 676 7,835 1.00 1.15 676 9,010 -8,334 404
I ROADS
Regions Total
Unspecified
Job Total
69,007 42,188 21,940 4,879 1,046 815 1.00 1.15 1,046 937 109 294
163,972
62,240
92,199
9,533
1,722 8,650
1,722 9,947 -8,225
698
170,133
33,477
124,821
11,835
2,427 4,437
1.00 1.15 2,427 5,103 -2,676
725
334,105
95,717
217,020
21,368
4,149 13,087
4,149 15,050-10,901
1,423
Plane Slope
Stripping Qtvs Area Area Depth Volume
STRIPPING Sub: 317,100 318,119 0.500 5,891
CO+45 FO+50 FO+85
Plane Slope ...
Sectional Qtvs Area Area Depth Volume
BLDG Sub: 94,965 95,248 0.667 2,353
ROADS Sub: 69,007 69,121 0.833 2,133
FO+36 - F1+11 FO+21 F1+50
Sectional Total 163,972 164,369 4,486 -
FO+75 FO+85 F2+03 CO+44 FO+27 ' FO+98
FO+86 _ F6+42 _ FO+67 CO+68 FO+70 CO+39 i C1+30 FO+69
/F2+37 F3+55 FO+75 CO+19 CO+44 CO+35 CO+97
%+ J F1+48 C2+09 FO+40 /CO+31 C0+41
-7
FO+53 FO+64 CO+36 FO+53 CO+59 FO+70
F3+83 F2+62 ; F3+83 F2+48 F1+04 FO+45
F4+32 F5+63 _ F3+91 CO+44 FO+65
F2+47 .: C2+77
--*,-, 11,
FO+17 FO+12
v
FO+43 - FO+39 i FO+23
3.75
3.50
3.25
3.00
2.75
2.50
2.25
2.00
1.75
1.50
1.25
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
± .100
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
3.50
3.75
OLDE MECKLENBURG BREWERY
PN: 1021117
AUGUST 3RD, 2022