25097-21-032 Eno Industrial EMP 2022-12-19

r�?rnAR�^• �C�P.•
Welcome Venture Park, LLC
5858 Westheimer, Suite 800
Houston, TX 77057
PREPARED 'S ,'
S&ME, Inc.
3201 Spring Forest Road
Raleigh, NC 27605
Corporate Registration for Licensing of NC Geologists No. C-145
NC Engineering Firm No. F-0176
December 15, 2022

r
December 15, 2022
North Carolina Brownfields Program
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management
217 West Jones Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Attention: Ms. Shristi Shrestha
Brownfields Project Manager
via email: shristi.shresthaCncdenr.gov
Reference: Environmental Management Plan - Welcome Venture Park — Revision 1
1420 Old Oxford Road, 1225, 1507, and 1539 Hamlin Road
Durham, Durham County, North Carolina
Brownfields Project Name: Eno Industrial Park
Brownfields Project No.: 25097-21-032
S&ME Project No. 218154A
Dear Ms. Shrestha:
On behalf of our client, Welcome Venture Park LLC (WVP, Client), S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is submitting this revised
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the above -referenced Brownfields redevelopment site in Durham,
Durham County, North Carolina. The EMP will support site development activities that are scheduled to
commence during December 2022/January 2023.
S&ME provides the following summary of the proposed site development activities under this EMP (Appendix 1)
and supporting documents required by the North Carolina Brownfields Program (NCBP) for approval. The
revisions to the EMP are based on discussions between NCBP and S&ME during a video conference on December
14, 2022.
* Proposed Site Development
The Prospective Developer (PD), WVP, intends to redevelop the property with 1.1 million to 1.5 million square feet
(SF) of light industrial warehouses. Phase 1 of the development encompasses approximately 61 acres and will
include roads, utilities, and five single -story commercial/light industrial buildings. Anticipated construction of
Phase 1 is scheduled to start in December 2022, with an anticipated 24-month completion schedule. Future
phases will be dictated by market conditions and tenant demand, but would likely be after the 24-month
construction is completed in Phase 1. The five (5) buildings in Phase 1 have the following preliminary designations
and square footage: Building C—100,000 SF, Building D—103,200 SF, Building E — 74,400 SF, Building F — 192,000
SF and Building G — 25,200 SF.
At this time, the PD anticipates soil will be borrowed ("cut") from the central portion of the site to fill portions of
the Phase 1 development to achieve the desired elevation. The anticipated depth of excavation in the Borrow
Area is approximately 19 to 30 feet below ground surface (ft-bgs). For Phase 1 development, no soil is anticipated
to be exported from the site. The proposed, on -site Borrow Area was the subject of soil assessment in July/August
S&ME, Inc. 13201 Spring Forest Road I Raleigh, NC 27616 1 p 919.872.2660 1 www.smeinc.com

2022 as part of the NCBP-approved assessment, reported in the Technical Report —Assessment of Soil,
Groundwater and Soil Gas, dated November 9, 2022, prepared by S&ME.
,t EMP Supporting Documents
The NC Brownfields Program Environmental Management Plan checklist form is provided in Appendix I. S&ME
provides the following additional documents and information in support of the EMP:
• Appendix II — Overall Storm Drainage and Grading Plan
• Appendix III — Redevelopment Plans
• Appendix IV — Preliminary Construction Schedule
• Appendix V — Soil, Groundwater and Soil Gas Summary Tables
• Appendix VI — Brownfields Assessment Figures
• Appendix VII — Borrow Area Historical Aerial Photographs and Maps
• Appendix Vill — Import Fill Quarry Information
• Appendix IX — NCDEQ Risk Calculator Output
• Appendix X — Amendments to Brownfields Environmental Management Plan
Please contact us with any questions or comments regarding this report at 919-872-2660.
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
Lucas A. Barroso-Giachetti, P.E., CHMM
Senior Environmental Engineer
[e-mail]
Samuel P. Watts, P.G.
Sr. Principal Geologist/Sr. Environmental Consultant
[e-mail]
cc: Sharon Eckard ([e-mail]) — NC Brownfields Program
Randy Warren [e-mail] — RW2 Development Company, LLC
Ted Kakambouras tkakambouras a welcome rou .com —Welcome Group, LLC
George House (,house(@brookspierce.com) — Brooks Pierce Law Firm
Enclosure: Environmental Management Plan, dated December 15, 2022
December 15, 2022

=0
List of Appendices
Appendix I — NC Brownfields Program Environmental Management Plan
Appendix Il — Overall Storm Drainage and Grading Plan
Appendix III — Redevelopment Plans
Appendix IV — Preliminary Construction Schedule
Appendix V — Soil, Groundwater and Soil Gas Summary Tables
Appendix VI — Brownfields Assessment Figures
Appendix VII — Borrow Area Historical Aerial Photographs and Maps
Appendix VIII — Import Fill Quarry Information
Appendix IX— NCDEQ Risk Calculator Output
Appendix X —Amendments to Brownfields Environmental Management Plan
December 15, 2022 3

Appendix I - Environmental Management Plan

NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.
The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory -compliant
decision -making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development -related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project,
and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be
cause for a reopener.
The EMP is valid only for the scope of work described herein and must be updated to be
applicable for new phases of redevelopment or after significant changes in applicable
regulatory guidance.
Voluntary Metrics Tab
The NC Brownfields Program updates estimated capital investment (from the Brownfields
Property Application) and estimated jobs created (from the Brownfields Agreement) whenever
possible. As a voluntary measure, you may opt to complete the below information for capital
investment and jobs created as estimated by your final redevelopment plans for the Brownfields
Property:
1. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: Approximately $100
Million to $200 Million.
2. Estimated jobs created:
a. Construction Jobs: Per the Brownfield Application, the project will create
many construction jobs based on the scale of the proposed development.
b. Full Time Post -Redevelopment Jobs: Per the Brownfield Application, many
permanent post -development jobs will be generated as a result of site
construction.
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Table of Contents
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................... 1
GENERALINFORMATION........................................................................................................................ 4
COMMUNICATIONS................................................................................................................................ 4
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM............................................................................... 5
REDEVELOPMENTPLANS........................................................................................................................ 5
CONTAMINATEDMEDIA......................................................................................................................... 7
PART1. Soil......................................................................................................................................... 8
PART2. GROUNDWATER.................................................................................................................. 17
PART3. SURFACE WATER.................................................................................................................. 19
PART4. SEDIMENT............................................................................................................................ 19
PART5. SOIL VAPOR......................................................................................................................... 20
PART6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR........................................................................................................ 20
PART7. INDOOR AIR......................................................................................................................... 21
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM............................................................................................. 22
CONTINGENCY PLAN — encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials ..................... 22
POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING..................................................................................................... 24
APPROVALSIGNATURES....................................................................................................................... 25
2
EMP Version 2, January 2021

So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.
® Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields' objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.
® Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:
® A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.
® A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.
® Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.
❑ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
on site after construction grading.
❑ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).
® A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.
® Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
® Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
❑ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.
® If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.
® Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.
EMP Version 2, January 2021

❑ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.
❑ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.
❑ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.
Date: 11/9/2022
GENERAL INFORMATION
Revision Date (if applicable): 12/15/2022
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Welcome Venture Park/Eno Industrial Park
Brownfields Project Number: 25097-21-032
Brownfields Property Address: 1420 Old Oxford Road, 1225 Hamlin Road, 1507 Hamlin Road and 1539
Hamlin Road, Durham, Durham County, North Carolina
Brownfields Property Area (acres): 160
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ....................... ❑ Yes to No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit ............ ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
COMMUNICATIONS
A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE -SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.
Prospective Developer (PD): Welcome Venture Park, LLC
Contact Person: C. Randy Warren, Jr.
Phone Numbers: Office: Click or tap hereto enter text.
Email: [e-mail]
Contractor for PD: Choate Construction
Contact Person: Chris Spies
Phone Numbers: Office: 919.719.4709
Email: csoiesC choateco.com
4
EMP Version 2, January 2021
Mobile: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]

Environmental Consultant: S&ME
Contact Person: Sam Watts, P.G.
Phone Numbers: Office: 919.954.6226 Mobile: [phone]
Email:
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Shristi Shrestha
Phone Numbers: Office: 919.707.8381 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: [e-mail]4
Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
Click or tap here to enter text
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsitetask:
On -site assessment or remedial activities: .................................................... 10 days Prior
Construction or grading start: .......................................................................... 10 days Prior
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ................................................................................ Within 48 hours
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones): ................................... Within 48 hours
Installation of mitigation systems: ................................................................ 10 days Prior
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ................................................................................. Within 30 days
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
❑Residential ❑Recreational ❑Institutional ❑Commercial ®Office []Retail ®Industrial
❑Other specify:
The prospective developer intends to redevelop the property with 1.1 million to 1.5 million
square feet of office and light industrial warehouses. The project will involve multiple buildings
occupied by a variety of tenants.
5
EMP Version 2, January 2021

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth -moving activities
at the site:
® Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
❑ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
® Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
• Phase I ESA by ASTM E1527-13 has been completed for the property
3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
The attached redevelopment plans in Appendix II and Appendix III show the proposed grading
plan, structures, parking areas and surrounding landscaping located within Phase I. Soils will be
graded and balanced in accordance with the attached plans, including importing soils from the
on -site Borrow Area, which has been assessed.
4) Do plans include demolition of structures)?:
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
❑ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.
5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
® If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.
6) Which category of risk -based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
❑ Residential ® Non -Residential or Industrial/Commercial
7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 1/2/2023
b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
6
EMP Version 2, January 2021
AL

Phase 1 construction schedule duration is approximately 24-months. Summary of start
anticipated start dates for significant site development milestones:
1/2/23 — Mobilize, Install Phase 1 erosion control measures
1/2/23 — Install erosion control measures for Borrow Area
3/6/23 — Mass grading
8/4/23 — Building Pad D
8/18/23 — Building Pad E
9/1/23 — Building Pad F
9/18/23 — Building Pad G
3/20/24 — Building D Complete
3/29/24— Building E Complete
5/24/24 — Building F Complete
5/31/24— Building G Complete
A detailed (preliminary) construction schedule is included in Appendix IV.
c) Additional phases planned? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Phase 2 of the development is not anticipated to commence until 2024 or 2025.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
To be determined.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
To be determined.
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 6/1/2024
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Please fill out the sections below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas
of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure overlaying new
construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil: .............................................................. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Suspected ❑ Unknown
Part 2. Groundwater: ............................................ ® Yes ® No ❑ Suspected ❑ Unknown
VA
EMP Version 2, January 2021
�(G

Part 3. Surface Water: ..........................................
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 4. Sediment: ...................................................
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part S. Soil Vapor: ..................................................
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 6. Sub -Slab Soil Vapor: ..................................
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 7. Indoor Air: ...................................................
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.
Appendix V includes tables summarizing the analytical results for soil, groundwater and soil gas
from the following reports prepared by S&ME:
• Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment, dated February 22, 2022
• Technical Report —Assessment of Soil, Groundwater and Soil Gas, dated November 9, 2022
Appendix VI includes figures presenting the analytical results from the following reports prepared
by S&ME:
• Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, dated February 22, 2022
• Technical Report —Assessment of Soil, Groundwater and Soil Gas, dated November 9, 2022
Report
PART 1. Soil
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
There is one localized area of soil contaminated with Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in the
south-central portion of the site, which is scheduled for excavation and disposal at a licensed
solid waste facility.
As shown on the tables and figures in Appendix V and VI, arsenic was the only constituent
detected above the applicable Industrial /Commercial Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals
(PSRGs). However, it should be noted:
• The calculated mean of the arsenic data set for the development is below the Industrial
/Commercial PSRG.
• Arsenic is naturally occurring in soil and rocks in this locality at a concentration that
exceeds the PSRGs.
• Arsenic was detected in on -site "background" samples
Therefore, most on -site soils will be considered non -impacted during the development activities
and managed without restrictions onsite.
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Approximately 15 cubic yards of PCB -containing soil located within surficial soils (12 inches below
ground surface based on 2022 assessment results).
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
8
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Total --> 160 acres or approximately 7,000,000 square feet
Phase 1 Development --> Roughly estimated at 61 acres or 2,700,000 square feet.
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
• Approx 15 cubic yards of PCB -containing soil will be excavated to 1 foot below ground surface
(ft-bgs), prior to site grading.
Across the remainder of the site, grading excavation will range from 30-40 feet below existing
grade.
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
To be determined. Roughly estimated at—700,000 cubic yards based on the current plans for
Phase 1 Development.
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
Less than 15 cubic yards of PCB -containing soil are impacted in one localized area. This material
will be directly loaded onto trucks for proper disposal at the Republic Services Upper Piedmont
Landfill in Rougemont, North Carolina (Landfill). As of the date of this EMP, the Landfill has
approved the Waste Profile and will receive the PCB -impacted soils under a Non -Hazardous
Waste Manifest.
Across the remainder of the site, impacted soils are not anticipated based on the soil assessment
results.
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
Approximately 15 cubic yards of PCB -containing surficial soils. (Plus an Electric Transformer with
less than 10 gallons of PCB -containing oil and PCB -contaminated equipment.)
Part I.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminarydata available).
1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... []Yes ®No
❑ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ If yes, do the soils exceed the "Contained -Out" levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained -In Policy? ................................................. ❑ Yes ❑ No
9
EMP Version 2, January 2021

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED -OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED -IN POLICYTHE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE? .................................... ❑ Yes ® No
❑ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
❑ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
k._: ;a.,: c't1ter teai.
® If no, explain rationale:
Laboratory analysis detected PCBs in the dielectric fluid (oil) from inside the
transformer at a concentration of 5.87 parts per million (ppm) and in soil at
0.129 ppm, which are less than 50 ppm, the concentration at which PCBs are
regulated for disposal under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). At lower
PCB concentrations (2 ppm to less than 50 ppm), PCB -containing soil/oil is only
subject to restrictions listed in title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
section 761.20(e), 40 CFR part 279, and is regulated by the EPA and applicable
state and local laws.
Laboratory analysis of soil samples, collected from the site, detected arsenic at a
concentration greater than its Industrial/Commercial Preliminary Soil
Remediation Goal (PSRG). However, the following should be noted:
• The calculated mean of the arsenic data set for the development is below the
Industrial /Commercial PSRG.
• Arsenic is naturally occurring in soil and rocks in this locality at a
concentration that exceeds the PSRGs.
• Arsenic was detected in the on -site "background" sample.
d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAYNOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
10
EMP Version 2, January 2021
�(L

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
❑ Preliminary Health -Based Residential SRGs
® Preliminary Health -Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
❑ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
❑ Site -specific risk -based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Additional comments:
3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
❑ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
® Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known
❑ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
❑ Manage soil under impervious cap ❑ or clean fill ❑
❑ Describe cap or fill:
x enter text.
® Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re -recorded if
actions are Post -Recordation).
® GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
❑ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:
Click or tap here
4) Please describe the following action(s) to betaken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
® Yes, describe the method will include:
General practices for the management of fugitive dust will include the following:
■ The use of dust control methods such as water spraying of dry material and/or
limiting activities when winds exceed a sustained velocity of 20 miles per hour may
11
EMP Version 2, January 2021
.21

be required.
■ Stockpile locations are expected to move around the site based on the construction
schedule and available areas of the site. If the material is to be stockpiled for a
period longer than one work day, then it should be placed in a designated stockpile
area, with appropriate E&SC measures.
❑ No, explain rationale:
_ .L12rtext.
Field Screening of site soil
❑ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
Click or tap here to enter text.
® No, explain rationale:
Based on the soil analytical results generated during the soil assessment, field screening of
soils during site development activities is not warranted.
Soil Sample Collection
❑ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in -situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
® No, explain rationale:
Confirmatory soil samples have already been collected at the limits of the anticipated soil
excavation in the Electrical Transformer/PCB-impacted soils area. Based on the soil
analytical results generated during the soil assessment, no additional soil sampling is
warranted.
If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
❑ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
❑ Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
❑ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
. IILiL Ui 1di7 OLf:: LCi tlllNl �r-.�.•
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tao here in Pnter tex,
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
12
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
..,-..w,;. L��;. %:c
® Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:
Acknowledged. If an alternate stockpile methodology is planned due to construction considerations
and/or safety concerns, S&ME will submit the proposed alternate methodology to the Brownfields
Project Manager for review and approval prior to implementation.
® Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (Check all thatapply):
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 6010/7471
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
y11LR Vi LGF. .CiZ LLB ltZn-
® PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 8082 and PCB Congeners by EPA Method 1668.
® Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199
Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, indicate if a work
plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
If contaminated soil is encountered, exposed, and managed onsite, then final sample
locations will be coordinated with NCBP Project Manager priorto occupancy of relevant
buildings near the exposed soil.
® If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale:
Based on the analytical results generated during the assessment activities, site soils are not
considered to be impacted at levels above their applicable Industrial/Commercial Health
Based PSRGs for this development. Therefore, post -grading soil sampling is not proposed
or warranted for this Brownfields development.
13
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Less than 15 cubic yards of PCB -containing soil are impacted in one localized area. This
material will be directly loaded onto trucks for proper disposal at the Republic Services
Upper Piedmont Landfill in Rougemont, North Carolina (Landfill). As of the date of this
EMP, the Landfill has approved the Waste Profile and will receive the PCB -impacted soils
under a Non -Hazardous Waste Manifest.
Across the remainder of the site, impacted soils are not anticipated based on the soil
assessment results.
Part I.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL
NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, "Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner."
Requirements for importing fill:
1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ................................................ ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
Not applicable.
3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (if a range
of depths, please list the range.)
Approximately 15 feet below proposed grade.
4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
The PD will excavate soil from the on -site Borrow Area identified in the attached figures
(Appendix VI) and manage them during the development of Phase I. The history of the Borrow
Area included within the site was assessed during Phase I ESA completed by S&ME and was
included in the NCBP-approved Work Plan Assessment completed during July 2022 (reported in
S&ME's report: Technical Report —Assessment of Soil, Groundwater and Soil Gas, dated
November 9, 2022). Historical aerial photographs and USGS Topographic Maps are provided in
Appendix VI1.
An estimated 23,000 cubic yards of gravel/stone will be imported for retaining wall construction,
foundation and utility support, drainage, equipment support pad (laydown), parking, driveway,
and general grading. At this time, the PD has identified two possible sources for imported stone:
14
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Martin Marietta Raleigh -Durham Quarry Carolina Sunrock Quarry
6028 Triangle Drive 100 Sunrock Drive
Raleigh, NC 27617 Butner, NC 27509
5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use atthe Brownfields property.
No soil is planned to be imported to the site.
6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 6010/7471.
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
U.;.K L)i iUp LICI L� LQ laiLCf �tr.
® Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199.
7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in -situ
borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought
onto the Brownfields Property.
If imported soil is proposed for the site development, S&ME will submit a Work Plan to NCBP for
review and approval.
Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL
NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.
15
EMP Version 2, January 2021

1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.
Approximately 15 cubic yards of PCB -containing soils will be excavated to a minimum of 1 foot
below ground surface (ft-bgs), prior to site grading. This material will be directly loaded onto
trucks for proper disposal at the Republic Services Upper Piedmont Landfill in Rougemont, North
Carolina (Landfill). As of the date of this EMP, the Landfill has approved the Waste Profile and
will receive the PCB -impacted soils under a Non -Hazardous Waste Manifest. The location of the
PCB -impacted soils and results of the confirmation sampling are summarized in S&ME's report,
Technical Report —Assessment of Soil, Groundwater and Soil Gas. Tables and figures from this
report detailing the sampling activities and analytical results are provided in Appendix V and
Appendix VI, respectively.
Due to the shallow depth of the PCB -impacted soils, the excavation will not be backfilled. No
other soil is expected to be disturbed to be exported offsite, at this time.
2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
® Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
❑ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting Landfill;
® Landfarm or other treatment facility
❑ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property — determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and thata record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
❑ Use as Beneficial Fill off -site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.
3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).
Transfer of site soils to another Brownfields development is not proposed at this time.
Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
❑ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
16
EMP Version 2, January 2021
A(

(Preferred)
® Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original
depth from which it was excavated.
❑ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
❑ Ifyes, provide specifications on barrier materials or provide the results of this evaluation in the
Vapor Mitigation Plan. Note that if vapor mitigation is planned for site buildings, utility
corridors will need to be evaluated as part of mitigation designs:
® If no, include rationale here:
Based on the soil gas assessment results and the Hazard Index output from the NCDEQ Risk
Calculator, vapor intrusion is not considered a concern for the development.
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Unknown, details to be provided in the Vapor Mitigation Plan for site buildings
Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Based on the soil analytical results generated during the assessment, soils are not considered to be
contaminated and will be managed as non -impacted material.
PART 2. GROUNDWATER
1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
Depth to water ranges from approximately 8 feet to 23 feet below ground surface based on
measurements from monitoring wells MW-16, MW-17 and MW-19 in August 2022.
2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ❑onsite ❑offsite ®both or ❑unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
A Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc. (MEUS) facility was formerly located southwest of the site.
Chlorinated organic compounds including tetrachloroethene (PCE) and its associated breakdown
products were identified in soil, surface water and groundwater at the MEUS property during
investigations by others and are known to have migrated onto the site. Groundwater
remediation has been performed to help reduce concentrations in groundwater and
groundwater impacts appear to be delineated and appear to be generally decreasing. However,
groundwater and surface water have been shown to flow east towards the site. The assessment
completed by S&ME per the NCBP-approved Work Plan did not identify groundwater and/or soil
gas above their applicable standards in this area of the proposed development outside Phase 1.
3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
Generally to the east/northeast as shown on the groundwater potentiometric figures in
17
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Appendix VI.
4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
®Yes ❑No
If yes, describe these activities:
Based on the proposed Phase I development activities, there is a low likelihood that groundwater
will be encountered. Construction activities may include foundation installation, utilities and
other earthwork activities.
Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered
during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent
management of groundwater (e.g., dewateringof groundwater from excavations or
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or
sampling procedures).
Contaminated groundwater is not anticipated to be encountered during site development. If
obvious signs of contaminated or potentially impacted groundwater is discovered (e.g., sheen,
petroleum odors, the General Contractor shall coordinate with S&ME for the appropriate
investigation and/or mitigation of an environmental impact. If contaminated groundwater is
encountered that will inhibit the progress of site development, the contaminated groundwater
will be pumped from the excavation, contained, sampled, and properly disposed at a licensed
facility if needed.
5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................®Yes ❑No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................®Yes []No
6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
® Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program's intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
® Location of existing monitoring wells marked
® Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
® Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.
7) Please provide additional details as needed:
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.
18
EMP Version 2, January 2021
Z�r

PART 3. SURFACE WATER
1) Is surface water present at the property? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a ma q showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ❑ Yes ® No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ® Yes ❑ No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
Contaminated surface water is not anticipated to be encountered during site development based
on the history of the property and the Phase I ESA completed by S&ME.
S&ME collected environmental samples of sediment and surface water from the on -site pond
and on -site stream for analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, 8
RCRA Metals, and hexavalent chromium by EPA Methods 6010D and 7196A. Laboratory analysis
of the surface water indicated all constituents were less than Surface Water (213) Standards.
If contaminated, or potentially impacted, surface water is encountered that will inhibit the
progress of site development, the contaminated surface water will be contained, sampled, and
properly disposed at a licensed facility, if needed.
PART 4. SEDIMENT
1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ® Yes ❑ No
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ® Yes ❑ No
4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.
5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
The on -site pond will be drained and following Division of Water Quality (DWQ) guidance for
draining ponds and the E&SC Plan for land disturbance. A road crossing will be installed across
the on -site stream.
19
EMP Version 2, January 2021

If contaminated sediment is observed through visual or olfactory observations, the contaminated
sediment will be stockpiled as shown in the attached Figure 1. S&ME will collect a sample from
the stockpiled material for analysis. The stockpiled sediment will be re -used on site, or disposed at
a licensed disposal facility pending analytical results.
PARTS. SOIL VAPOR
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:...........® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Groundwater:.....® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Groundwater: ..... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a may showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?
Based on the soil gas analytical results, the laboratory reported VOCs below their applicable Soil Gas
Screening Levels (SGSLs) for a Non-Residential/Commercial land use. The soil gas analytical results
are summarized on the tables in Appendix V and the figures in Appendix VI.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during
redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list
activities for management of such contact:
PART 6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in sub -slab soil vapor:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Groundwater:.....❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
20
EMP Version 2, January 2021

2) Groundwater: ..... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown If data indicate that sub -slab soil vapor
concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub -slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ❑0-6 inches ®Other, please
describe:
Based on the soil gas analytical results, the analytical laboratory reported VOCs below their
applicable SGSLs for a Non-Residential/Commercial land use.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub -slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ Unknown
® If no, include rationale here:
Based on the soil gas analytical results and the NCDEQ Risk Calculator Hazard Index outputs for
the site of nearly zero, there does not appear to be risks for workers during construction.
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
If contaminated sub -slab vapors are encountered during redevelopment activities that will
inhibit the safe work practices of the construction personnel, a temporary ventilation system will
be installed to divert contaminated vapors away from the breathing zone of the site workers and
the public.
PART 7. INDOOR AIR
1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk -based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
® If no, include rationale here:
There are no structures on -site.
Based on the soil gas data results and the NCDEQ Risk Calculator Hazard Index of 0.03 provided
in Appendix IX, a vapor intrusion mitigation system does not appear warranted for this proposed
Commercial/Industrial development.
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:
S&ME will conduct indoor air quality (IAQ) screening to evaluate the potential for soil vapors that may
pose a health risk. After completion of the IAQ evaluation, S&ME will propose the appropriate
mitigation action, if warranted, which may include a combination of monitoring work activities and/or
engineering controls in the short-term and discuss potential permanent mitigation efforts with NCBP.
21
EMP Version 2, January 2021

VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
® If no or unknown. include rationale here as well as plans for pre -occupancy sampling, as
necessary:
Based on the results of the soil gas assessment, the laboratory reported VOCs below their
applicable Non-Residential/Commercial Soil SGSLs and the NCDEQ Risk Calculator generated a
Hazard Index of 0.03 or near zero for the soil gas to indoor air pathway. Based on the soil gas
data results and the Hazard Index of 0.03, pre -occupancy sampling is not warranted.
If yes, ❑ VIMS Plan Attached or ❑ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
lick or tap here to enter text.
VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer
If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
Based on the soil gas data results and the NCDEQ Risk Calculator Hazard Index of 0.03, a vapor
mitigation plan is not warranted for this Brownfields development.
Note that approval of this EMP does not imply approval with any vapor intrusion mitigation land
use restrictions or requirements of the recorded or draft Brownfields Agreement and that
separate approval of mitigation measures will be required.
CONTINGENCY PLAN —encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials
In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, orother waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.
Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site -specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.
Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
22
EMP Version 2, January 2021

® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
.. to enter le::
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
® PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 8082
® Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199
Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
Underground Storage Tanks:
USTs are not anticipated to be encountered during site development based on the history of the
property and the Phase I ESA completed by S&ME. In the event a UST or potential tank system is
discovered, the PD's General Contractor will coordinate with S&ME for the appropriate
investigation and/or mitigation of an environmental impact. S&ME will notify the Brownfields
Project Manager if additional environmental assessment and/or remediation is proposed during site
development.
Sub -Grade Feature/Pit:
Sub -grade features or pits are not anticipated to be encountered during site development based on
the history of the property and the Phase I ESA completed by S&ME. In the event a sub -grade
feature of concern is discovered, the PD's General Contractor will coordinate with S&ME for the
appropriate investigation and/or mitigation of an environmental impact. S&ME will notify the
Brownfields Project Manager if additional environmental assessment and/or remediation is
proposed during site development.
Buried Waste Material — Note that if buried waste non-native fill or any obviously filled materials
is encountered. the DEQ Brownfields Program must be notified to determine if investigation of
landfill gases is re uired:
Acknowledged.
Re -Use of Impacted Soils On -Site:
As proposed in the NCBP-approved Work Plan for the site, soils from the Borrow Area located
23
EMP Version 2, January 2021

outside of the proposed Phase I development will be excavated, managed and placed throughout
the proposed Phase I development beneath structures, parking lots and landscaping areas. The
soils within the proposed Borrow Area were evaluated as part of the Work Plan assessment in July
2022 and August 2022.
If unknown, impacted soil is identified on -site, management on -site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on -site.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
_-re to enter text.
POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
® Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 1/31/2023
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment -related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).
® Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site's Brownfields Agreement.
24
EMP Version 2, January 2021
�v

APPROVAL SIGNATURES
Brownfields Project Number: 25097-21-032
Brownfields Project Name: Welcome Venture Park/Eno Industrial Park
b ecc'' rv%Ao e r , ZO ZL
Prospective Developer: Welcome Venom-lladtALC Date Click or tap to enter a date.
Printed Name/Title/Company: Click k)r t p here to��ee,nt r tox ,
W , 6 vrt� W S in *J �/ Nf' S �j CEU
f
Consultant: S&ME, Inc. Date: 12/16/2022
PrintedName/Title/Company: Samuel P. Watts, PG / Senior Consultant / S&ME, Inc.
This EMP is approved for Phase I of the development.
c�%l/Z.Gd c��!/ "6621 12/16/2022
Brownfields Project Manager:Click or tap here to enter text.
25
EMP Version 2, January 2021
Date Click or tap to enter a date.