22034_Fairey Finishing Plant_UST Section File Review 2012_05_10

Q._ 1y� 1 7 2012
NCDENR -
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor Dee Freeman, Secretary
Division of Waste Management
UST Section Dexter R. Matthews, Director
September 1,4, 2012
Ms. Wanda Maggart
Durham Technical Community College
1637 East Lawson Street
Durham, NC 27703
Re: Notice of No Further Action
15A NCAC 2L .0407(d)
Risk -based Assessment and Corrective Action
for Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks
Allpack assembly
1637 East Lawson Street, Durham
Durham County
Incident number: 39154
Risk Classification: Low
Dear Ms. Maggart:
The Limited Site Assessment received by the UST Section, Raleigh Regional Office on July 18,
2012 and the Notice of Residual Petroleum received on August 17, 2012 have been reviewed. The review
indicates that soil contamination exceeds the residential maximum soil contaminant concentrations
(MSCCs) established in Title 15A NCAC 2L .0411 and groundwater contamination meets the cleanup
requirements for a low -risk site but exceeds the groundwater quality standards established in Title 15A
NCAC 2L .0202.
The UST Section determines that no further action is warranted for this incident. This
determination shall apply unless the UST Section later finds that the discharge or release poses an
unacceptable risk or a potentially unacceptable risk to human health or the environment. Pursuant to Title
15A NCAC 2L .0407(a) you have a continuing obligation to notify the Department of any changes that
might affect the risk or land use classifications that have been assigned.
Be advised that as groundwater contamination exceeds the groundwater quality standards
established in Title 15A NCAC 2L .0202, groundwater within the area of contamination or within the area
where groundwater contamination is expected to migrate is not suitable for use as a water supply. Be
advised that as soil contamination exceeds the residential MSCCs, the property containing the
contamination is suitable only for industrial/ commercial use (The term "residential is inclusive of, but not
limited to, private houses, apartment complexes, schools, nursing homes, parks, recreation areas and day
care centers), as stipulated in the Notice of Residual Petroleum (attached).
As groundwater contamination exceeds the groundwater quality standards established in Title
15A NCAC 2L .0202 and soil contamination exceeds the residential MSCCs, pursuant to NCGS 14313-
279.9 and 14313-279.11, you must file the approved Notice of Residual Petroleum (attached) with the
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer - 50 % Recycled 110 % Post Consumer Paper

Register of Deeds in the county in which the release is located and submit a certified copy to the US'i,
Section within 30 days of receipt of this letter. This No Further Action determination will not become
valid until the UST Section receives a certified copy of the -Notice of Residual Petroleum which is filed'
with the Register of Deeds.
As groundwater contamination exceeds the groundwater quality standards established in Title
15A NCAC 2L .0202 and soil contamination exceeds the lower of the soil -to -groundwater or residential
MSCCs, public notice in accordance with 15A NCAC 2L :0409(b) also is required. Thus, within 30 days
of receipt of this letter, a copy of the letter must be provided by certified mail, or by posting in a
prominent place, if certified mail is impractical, to the local health director, the chief administrative
officer of each political jurisdiction in which the contamination occurs, all property owners and occupants
within or contiguous to the area containing contamination, and all property owners and occupants within
or contiguous to the area where the contamination is expected to migrate. Within 60 days of receiving
this no further action letter, this office must be provided with proof of receipt of the copy of the letter or _
of refusal by the addressee to accept delivery of the copy of the letter or with a description of the manner
in which the letter was posted. This No Further Action determination will not become valid until public
notice requirements are completed. Interested parties may examine the Soil Cleanup Report/ Site Closure
Request by contacting > this regional office and may submit comments on the site to the regional office at
the address or telephone number listed below.
This No Further, Action determination applies only to the subject incident; for any other incidents
at the subject site, the responsible party must continue to address contamination as required.
If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact me at the address or telephone
number listed below.
Sincerely,
Mark R. Powers
Regional Supervisor
UST. Section, DWM, NCDENR
Raleigh Regional Office.
Attachments: Notice of Residual Petroleum.
cc: Robert Brown, Durham County Health Department
Michael W. Pfeifer — S&ME 3201 Spring Forest Road, Raleigh, NC 27616
RRO UST Incident files/WER
UST Regional Offices
Asheville (ARO) — 2090 US Highway 70, Swannanoa, NC 28778 (828) 2964500
Fayetteville (FAY) — 225 Green Street, Suite 714, Systel Building, Fayetteville, NC 28301 [phone]
Mooresville (MOR) — 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 [phone]
Raleigh (RRO) — 1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 [phone]
Washington (WAS) — 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 (252) 946'6481
Wilmington (WIL) — 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405 [phone]
Winston-Salem (WS) — 585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, NC 21107 [phone]
Guilford County Environmental Health, 4.00 West Market Street, Suite 300, Greensboro, NC 27401, [phone]
1-"FP: NFA low-NRP NOR0512.dot

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor Division of Waste Management Dee Freeman, Secretary
UST Section Dexter R. Matthews, Director
May 10, 2012
Ms. Wanda Maggart
Durham Technical Community College
1637 East Lawson Street
Durham, NC 27703
Re: Notice of Regulatory Requirements
15A NCAC 2L .0405
Risk -based Assessment and Corrective Action
for Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks
Allpack assembly
1637 East Lawson Street, Durham
Durham County
Incident number: 39154
Risk Classification: Pending
Ranking: Pending
Dear Ms. Maggart:
The Initial Abatement Action Report received by the UST Section, Raleigh Regional Office on
April 2, 2012 has been reviewed. The report indicates that soil contamination exceeds or equals the 10
mg/kg total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) screening limit (or exceeds the lower of the residential or soil -
to -groundwater maximum soil contaminant concentrations (MSCCs) established in Title 15A NCAC 2L
.0411). Therefore, the UST Section hereby confirms that you must comply with assessment and reporting
requirements of Title 15A NCAC 2L .0405, within the timeframes specified in the attached rule.
The requirements of Title 15A NCAC 2L .0405 include the preparation and submittal of a
Limited Site Assessment (LSA) Report, in accordance with the rule and the most recent version of the
Guidelines for Assessment and Corrective Action for UST Releases, within 120 days of discovery of the
release.
Because a release or discharge has been confirmed, a Licensed Geologist or a Professional
Engineer, certified by the State of North Carolina, is required to prepare and certify all reports submitted
to the Department in accordance with Title 15A NCAC 2L .0103(e) and 2L .011 l(b).
Please note that before you sell, transfer, or request a "No Further Action" determination for a
property that has not been remediated to below "unrestricted use" standards, you must file a Notice of
Residual Petroleum ("Notice") with the Register of Deeds in the county where the property is located
(NCGS 143B-279.9 and 143B-279.11).
Failure to comply with the State's rules in the manner and time specified may result in the
assessment of civil penalties and/or the use of other enforcement mechanisms.
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer- 50 % Recycled , 10 °o Post Consumer Paper

Jul 1
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor Division of Waste Management Dee Freeman, Secretary
UST Section Dexter R. Matthews, Director
July 19, 2012
Ms. Wanda Maggart
Durham Technical Community College
1637 East Lawson Street
Durham, NC 27703
Re: Notice of Regulatory Requirements
NCGS 143B-279.9 and 143B-279.11
Notice of Residual Petroleum
Allpack assembly
1637 East Lawson Street, Durham
Durham County
Incident number: 39154
Risk Classification: Low
Dear Ms. Maggart:
North Carolina General Statute (NCGS) 143B279.9 and. 143B-279.11 require a Notice of
Residual Petroleum (Notice) to be filed with the Register of Deeds in Durham County, where the release
is located, when a release from an underground storage tank has not been remediated to below
"unrestricted use standards". The Notice is required either prior to conveyance of a contaminated
property or prior to receiving a Notice of No Further Action. "Unrestricted use standards" for
groundwater are the groundwater quality standards and interim standards contained in Title 15A NCAC
2L .0202, and "unrestricted use standards" for soil are the residential maximum soil contaminant
concentrations (MSCCs) established in Title 15A NCAC 2L .0411.
The Notice must be prepared in accordance with the attached instructions and format. It must
contain a legal description of the property containing the source of contamination and legal descriptions
of any other properties which you own (or control) which are contaminated by the release. The Notice
must also include appropriate land use restrictions for these properties. In addition, the Notice must
identify all other properties (adjacent, adjoining, downgradient, etc.) on which contamination is known to
exist at the time the Notice is prepared.
The Notice must be sent to this regional office of the UST Section within 30 days of the date of
this letter for approval and notarization. The approved and notarized Notice must.then be filed by you
with the Register of Deeds, and a certified copy of the filed Notice must be submitted to this office within
30 days of its return to you.
Effective October 1, 2004, the Department requires that all work following the submittal of the
Limited Site Assessment Report (Title 15A NCAC 2L .0405) be preapproved if State Trust Fund
reimbursement is anticipated. To comply with this requirement, a completed Preapproval/Claim
Authorization Form, encompassing the required remedial activities, must be received in this office within
14 days of the date of this letter. Upon completion of the preapproved activities, you should submit your
An Equa! Cpportt!nity A!'!ir.mat!Ve Action rmp!eyer- 50 ",i, Rcryoled 110 Pon[ Consumler Paper

August 15, 2012
NCDENR, Division of Waste Management
Raleigh Regional Office
UST Section
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Attention: Mr. Mark Powers
Regional Supervisor
F— -
rg
12 I
14C G�i`1R
Reference: Notice of Residual Petroleum
Allpack Assembly Property (Incident No. 39154)
1604 East Lawson Street
Durham, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1054-11-195D
Dear Mr. Powers:
On behalf of our client, Durham Technical Community College, S&ME, Inc. is
submitting duplicate executed and notarized copies of the Notice of Residual Petroleum
(NORP). The NORP was prepared in response to your Notice of Regulatory
Requirements, dated July 19, 2012, and identifies the one parcel subject to Perpetual
Land Use Restrictions regarding soil and groundwater usage.
Please review the enclosed NORP, execute, and notarize, then return to us to have the
NORP recorded at the Durham County Register of Deeds office. One final certified copy
will be returned to your office. Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed
NORP, please contact us by email or by phone at [phone].
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
Mich fei
Project Manager
mpfeifer(a,s meinc.com
Enclosures:
Thomas Raymond, P.E.
Senior Consultant
traymond(fi), smeinc.com
Two originals of Durham Technical Community College executed Notice of Residual
Petroleum, dated August 14, 2012
S&ME, INC. / 3201 Spring Forest Road / Raleigh, NC 27616 / p 919.872.2660 f 919.876.3958 / www.smeinc.com

September 24, 2012
NCDENR, Division of Waste Management
Raleigh Regional Office
UST Section
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Attention: Mr. Mark Powers
Regional Supervisor
�.' SEP 2 6 2012
Reference: Filing of Notice of Residual Petroleum
Allpack Assembly Property (Incident No. 39154)
1604 East Lawson Street
Durham, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1054-11-195D
Dear Mr. Powers:
On behalf of our client, Durham Technical Community College, S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is
submitting a certified copy of the filing of the Notice of Residual Petroleum (NORP) at
the Durham County Registar of Deeds Office. We understand, per your letter of
September 14, 2012, that the No Further Action determination will not become valid until
the UST Section receives this certified filing.
S&ME will be preparing a notification to property owners and occupants within or
contiguous to the area containing contamination, property owners and occupants within
or contiguous to the area where the contamination is expected to migrate, and the local
health director, and the chief administrative office of each political jurisdiction in which
the contamination occurs. This notification will include a copy of the September 14,
2012 Notice of No Further Action letter. Proof of this notification will be submitted to
your office with 60 days of receipt of the September 14, 2012 Notice of No Further
Action Letter.
Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed filing of the NORP, please contact
us by email or by phone at [phone].
Sincerely,
S&ME, Inc.
Micha
Project Manager
mpfeiferAsmeinc.com
cc: Wanda Maggart, Durham Technical Community College
Enclosure: Certified copy of Recorded Notice of Residual Petroleum
S&ME, INC. / 3201 Spring Forest Road / Raleigh, NC 27616 / p 919.872.2660 f 919.876,3958 / www.smeinc.com

Willie L. Covington
Durham, Dior 'Caro 'na� 27701 �
� tw � ,t `��1 aY,
Af
State of North CaroIma
County of Durham
)(td ereby ertifyhis to be a true c o`e attached doe Yi mentyfiled
recorded in the,afo esa d county aV=evideeded i' B o, No. 7074 Page No. 31.'a
h :
Page�'l'To'71. a
Witness my hand ancl�' eal thi 2,1st da' of . Atem er 2�01
Willie LCovington, gister of Deeds
rf r 1
Signature o�fmm eput Rega N
is e. ,. Deus ' ' ; �u
.fix�+�
Official Seal of Registe ?'I Dbe s e F y a V
\/ ! *'Faux �'` '" • ��'^�t,��^a."" tS * °
�T cr `'kf i �r ;a,• .n,' `� �',�
of i i
to k5it �u $,4 s z "ell
Certification Form
Durham County North Carolina
December 2002
with

FOR REGISTRATION REGISTER OF DEEDS
WL.
DURHnM COUNTY. NCn
2012 SEP 21 09:17:46 AM
BK:7074 PG ; 361-371 FEE: $26. 00
NOTICE OF RESIDUAL PETROLEUM
Allpack Assembl , Durham County, North Carolina -+c ; 3Zy Sp#, i:mert Id
(Site name) l�lc?-tJo 1)iIVG.2-1G i6
The property that is the subject of this Notice (hereinafter referred to as the "Site") contains
residual petroleum and is an Underground Storage Tank (UST) incident under North Carolina's
Statutes and Regulations, which consist of N.C.G.S. 143-215.94 and regulations adopted thereunder.
This Notice is part of a remedial action for the Site that has been approved by the Secretary (or
his/her delegate) of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (or its
successor in function), as authorized by N.C.G.S. Section 14313-279.9 and 14313-279.11. The North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources shall hereinafter be referred to as
"DENR".
NOTICE
Petroleum product was released and/or discharged at the Site. Petroleum constituents remain on
the site, but are not a danger to public health and the environment, provided that the restrictions
described herein, and any other measures required by DENR pursuant to N.C.G.S. Sections 143B-
279.9 and 14313-279.11, are strictly complied with. This "Notice of Residual Petroleum" is composed
of a description of the property, the location of the residual petroleum and the land use restrictions on the
Site. The Notice has been approved and notarized by DENR pursuant to N.C.G.S. Sections 143B-279.9
and 143B-279.11 and has/shall be recorded at the Durham County Register of Deeds' office
(name ofcounty)
Book Page
Any map or plat required by DENR has been/shall be recorded at the Durham County Register of
(name of county)
Deeds' office Book ,Page , and has been/shall be incorporated into the Notice by this reference.
Source Property
Trustees of Durham Technical Community College of Durham, North Carolina is the
(owner's name) (city & state ofhomeowner)
owner in fee simple of all or a portion of the Site, which is located in the County of Durham, State of
North Carolina, and is known and legally described as:
3 Revised February 1, 2010

Durham County Register of Deeds' office, Book 6869, Page86-889 (NC PIN 0830-06-49-8285)
Beginning at an iron stake on the south side of Lawson Street, said stake being south 89 degrees 00
minutes East 250 feet from the intersection of the south side of Lawson Street, extended, and on the east
side of Troy Street, extended; thence from said point of beginning South 1 degree 00 minutes West 650.00
feet to an iron stake on the North side of Cooper Avenue; thence along and with the north side of Cooper
Avenue North 59 degrees 00 minutes West 220 feet to a monument; thence continuing around the
intersection of Cooper Avenue and Troy Street in a general northwest direction along the arc of a circle
with a radius of 30 feet, a distance of 47.12 feet to an iron stake on the East side of Troy Street; thence
along and with the east side of Troy Street North 1 degree 00 minutes East 590 feet to an iron stake; thence
continuing around the intersection of Troy Street and Lawson Street in a general northeasterly direction
along an arc of a circle with a radius of 30 feet, a distance of 47.12 feet to an iron stake on the South side
of Lawson Street; thence continuing along and with the south side of Lawson Street South 89 degrees 00
minutes East 220 feet to an iron stake, the place and point of BEGINNING, and being the property of the
Durham Investment Corporation, Durham, N.C., as per plat and survey of Credle Engineering Company
dated May 1964, recorded in the Office of the Registrar of Deeds, Durham County, in Plat Book 48, page
106, to which reference is hereby made for a more particular description of same.
Additional Affected Property Also Subject to Restrictions
of _ , North Carolina is the owner in
(owner's Name) (city &state of owner)
fee simple of a portion of the Site, which is located in the County of , State of North Carolina.
Petroleum contamination is located on this property at the time this Notice is approved. This property was
also owned or controlled by the underground storage tank owner or operator or another party responsible
for the petroleum discharge or release at the time the discharge or release was discovered or reported, or at
any time thereafter. This property is known and legally described as:
For protection of public health and the environment, the following land use restrictions required by
N.C.G.S. Section 143B-279.9(b) shall apply to all of the above -described real property. These restrictions
shall continue in effect as long as residual petroleum remains on the site in excess of unrestricted use
standards and cannot be amended or cancelled unless and until the Durham County Register of Deed
receives and records the written concurrence of the Secretary (or his/her delegate) of DENR (or its
successor in function).
Additional Affected Property Not Subject to Restrictions
Residual petroleum is also located on the following property. The following property is not subject to land
use restrictions pursuant to N.C.G.S. Section 143B-279.9(b). The following property is known and legally
described as:
Revised February 1, 2010
4

Not applicable.
PERPETUAL LAND USE RESTRICTIONS
soil: The Site shall be used for industrial/commercial use only. Industrial/Commercial use means
a use where exposure to soil contamination is limited in time and does not involve exposure to
children or other sensitive populations such as the elderly or sick. The real property shall not
be developed or utilized for residential purposes, including but not limited to, primary or
secondary residences (permanent or temporary), schools, daycare centers, nursing homes,
playgrounds, parks, recreation areas and/or picnic areas.
Groundwater: Groundwater from the site is prohibited from use as a water supply. Water supply wells
of any kind shall not be installed or operated on the site.
ENFORCEMENT
The above land use restriction(s) shall be enforced by any owner, operator, or other party
responsible for the Site. The above land use restriction(s) may also be enforced by DENR through any of
the remedies provided by law or by means of a civil action, and may also be enforced by any unit of local
government having jurisdiction over any part of the Site. Any attempt to cancel this Notice without the
approval of DENR (or its successor in function) shall be subject to enforcement by DENR to the full extent
of the law. Failure by any party required or authorized to enforce any of the above restriction(s) shall in no
event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter as to the same violation or as to one occurring
prior or subsequent thereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Trustees of Durham Technical Community College has caused this
Notice to be executed pursuant to N.C.G.S. Sections 143B-279.9 and 143B-279.11, this day of
2012.--
W
name of responsible party if agerl-is signing)
By: >L ` lo="
(sign re of responsible Party, attorney orpther i there�is one)
f
(Title of agent for responsible party if there is one)
Signatory's name typed or printed: W A, N 0 6- S• M A G G,A-a
Revised February 1, 2010

Choice One: Instrument signed by one person
NORTH CAROLINA
714,ehq lyL COUNTY
(Name of county in which acknowledgment was taken)
I certify that the following person per o ally a peafed before me this y, acknowledging to that he or
she signed the foregoing document: Q � S• Q Gy�.
Date:
(Official Seal) (si tuurre f atftry Pu lic
printed o typed name of Notary Public)
Notary Public
My commission expires: evo. C 07e/o
Choice Two: Acknowledge by attorney in fact
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY
(Name of county in which acknowledgment was taken)
a Notary Public for said County and State, do hereby certify that
attorney in fact for , personally appeared
before me this day, and being by me duly sworn, says that he executed the foregoing and annexed
instrument for and in behalf of the said , and that his authority to execute
and acknowledge said instrument is contained in an instrument duly executed, acknowledged, and
recorded in the office of in the County of State of
on the day of 200 and that this
instrument was executed under and by virtue of the authority given by said instrument granting him power
of attorney.
I do further certify that the said acknowledged the due execution of the
foregoing and annexed instrument for the purposes therein expressed for and in behalf of the said
WITNESS my hand and official seal, this the day of
(Official Seal)
9
(signature of Notary Public)
printed or typed name of Notary Public)
Notary Public
My commission expires:
i
Revised February 1, 2010

Choice Three: Conveying security interest in personal property of a corporation
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY
(Name of county in which acknowledgment was taken)
I,
a Notary Public for said County and State, do hereby certify that
personally came before me this day and acknowledged that he is
of and acknowledged, on behalf of
the grantor the due execution of the foregoing instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal, this the day of , 200
(Official Seal)
Approved for the purposes of N.C.G.S. 14313-279.11
.01
(signature of Regional Supervisor)
M -4 /ZK R Pm A✓ _ R S , Regional Supervisor
(printed name of Regional Supervisor)
Al L C/G N Regional Office
UST Section
Division of Waste Management
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
NORTH CAROLINA
(. a -et' COUNTY
(Name of county in which acknowledgment was taken)
(signature of Notary Public)
printed or typed name of Notary Public)
Notary Public
My commission expires:
I certify that the following person(s) personally appeared before me this day, each acknowledging to me
that he or she signed the foregoing document: Mary- 12 . TDLL)(,r5(full printed name of Regional Supervisor)
Date: A%.�r�,a1ALt,.i'--ooni7
�1••c'A� Er`t ��
(sign N�e ubh�
i •; _ `
V
printed or typed name of Notary Public)
1'.,�+,
Notary Public
o��v `,�;
�0100611100"
My commission expires: March 2-7 'WI-1
I
Revised February 1, 2010

(Page 1 of,4}
201'10�4'161Y�'��!�GVb�
:OR REGISTRATION REGISTER OF DEEDS
Willie L. Covington
DURHAM COUNTY, NO
2011 DEC 22 1237:5I PM
BK : 6869 PG 886-889 FEE 126 , 00
NC REV STRNP:$3i600.00
NIMBI # N11N9161'
$M00.00
Excise Tax Recardinz Time Book and Page
Tax Lot No.: Parcel, identifier -No.
Mail after recording to Grantee (a(MailingAddresr Blow)
This instrument was prepared -by: Jonathan W. Biggs; Siubbs, Cole,_Breedlove, Prentis &Biggs, P.L.L.C.
122 East Parrish Street; Durham, North Carolina 27701
Brief description for the Index: Fa;rev Finich;na pta.,r nr,,::.;..*hr L
Property Lawson Street
NORTH CAROLINA SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED
(PREPARED WITHOUT THE 'BENEFIT OF TITLE EXAMINATION)
THIS DEED made as of this f 5 t' day of December,;2011, by and between
GRANTOR
FAIREY FINISHING PLANT, INC.
Mailing Address:.
Attn: Robert L. Fairey
3838 Regent Road
Durham, North Carolina 27707
GRANTEE
TRUSTEES OF DURHAM TECHNICAL
COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Property,Address:
1604:East.Lawson Street
Durham, North Carolina 27703
Mailing Address;
1637 Lawson Street
Durham, North Carolina 27703
Eisler in epptopriatc block for each party; name, address, and;,if appropriate; character of entity; e.g., corporation or partnership..
The designation. Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors,
and shall include singular, plural,: masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
assigns,
WI NESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that
certain lot or parcel of land situated in the Durham County, North Carolina, and more particularly described as
follows:
SEE EXHIBIT A WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATE HEREIN AS IF SET FORTH IN ITS ENTIRETY.

(Page 2 of, 4)
The property bereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument(s) recorded in Book 1182 at Page 846
in the Durham County, North Carolina, Public Registry (the "Registry,").
In me liurnam �Iounry, Nonn Uarouna, eunite xegisrry tme --xegistry-).
THE PROPERTY IS NOT THE PRIMARY RESIDENCE OF EITHER THE GRANTOR OR THE GRANTEE,
TO HAVE AND TO tIOLD the aforesaid lot or parcelof land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto
belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And Grantor covenants with Grantee, that Grantor has done nothing to impair such title as Grantor received, and
Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, under or through
Grantor, except for the exceptions hereinafter stated.
Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
1. Easement to Duke Power Compahy recorded•in Deed Book 300 at Page 605.. ✓
2; Easement to Trustees of Durham Technical Community College recorded in, Deed Book 6223 at Page,
902 of the Durham County Registry.
3. Easement to Diixie. Beari4g5,. nc, re_ corded in Deed Book 1046 at Page 22 of the Durham County -�
Registry..
4:. Matters shown onPlat recorded in Plat Book 48 at Page 166 of the Durham'County. Registry. ✓
5. Markers shown on Plat recorded in Plat, Book 99 at Page 36 of the Durham County Registry
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the. Grantor has hereunto-sethis hand and seal, or if 'corporate, has: caused this
instrument to be signed ib it$ .carporate name by its duly authorized officers the day and year first above written.
GRANTOR:
FAIREY FINISHING PLANT, INC,
a North Carolina business. corporation
BY: G `ilk// 'A" f-e—,.
ROBERT L. FAIREY, President
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF DURH
I, i-en n t., t ' `' Lola, Notary Public, certify that the following person personally appeared
before me this day, each ackndwledging, to me that he or she voluntarily signed the foregoing document for the
purpose stged therein and in the capacity indicated:' Robert L. Fairey. Witness my hand and. official stamp or seal,
this ,2i— day of December, 2011.
My commission expires: M, Q f } t ��
'7-2(a - `o?016 �'a��� LOG Notary Pub
(Official Seal) 1
A G =U
UBL�_rC

(Page 3 oft 44
EXHIBIT A
I-EGAT, nF.R(".RiPTTnN
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BEGINNING at an iron stake on the south side of Lawson. Street, said stake being
south 89 dooread'00 minutes East 260 feet from the,int®.rseetion of the south
side of Lawson Street, extended, and on the east side of Troy Street, extended;.*
thence from said point, of beginning South I degree oO minutes West 550..00 feet
to an iron stake on the North side of Cooper Avenue;, thence along and with the
north side of Cooper Avenue North 89 degrees 00_minutes West 220 feet to d
monument; thence continuing around the intersection of Cooper Avenue and Troy
Street. -in:a general northwest direction along the arc; of a circle with a
radius of 30 feet':, :a distance of d7.i2 feet to an iron stake on the East side
of Troy Street; thence along and with the East aide. of Troy Street North 1
degree 00 minutes East,590 feet town iron stake; thence continuing around.
the intersection of Troy Street and. Lawson Street in a, general northeasterly
direction along the.arc of a'circle with a radius of 30 feet, a distance of
47,12'feet to. an iron stake on the South side of Lawson Street; thence
continuing along_ and with: the 'South sideofLawson Street, South.89 degrees
OO minutes East 220 feet to an iron stake., the place and po nt,of BE4INNYNQ,
and being the property of Durham Investment Corporation, Durham, N. C.,
as per plat and survey thereof of Credle Engineering Company dated May 3964,,
recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds, Durham County, in. Plat Hook 48,:
page 206, to which:: reference .is'hereby made for a: more particular description
of same;.

(Pagel of11)
14,
PG
0 E;
I�r
• Vie- Yg�
TROY STREET w.
a m a —
x z x mI
-i m °- z
Zm ? Z
m m J p eeo.00'
t7 1 �I $ i ie-fi8'W N
z n m m
Q z m w '.
's i c .1 r^
o a w
ate.• '_' oa °
:' •..;rye... ..•�+r �

LEGEND GRAPHIC SCALE
B APPROXIMATE MONITOR WELL LOCATION so o 25 50 100
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE COLLECTED JUNE 8, 2012
• INDICATES EXCDEEDENCE OF 21. STANDARD ( IN FEET )
IMAGE SOURCE: NC ONEMAP, DATED 2010
1 ° = 109
JULY 2012 *vS&ME
Iv` BTR
WWW.SMEINC.COM
'NO: NC ENGINEER LICENSE #F-0176
1054-11-195C 3201 SPRING FOREST RD, RALEIGH, NC 27615
GROUNDWATER CONSTITUENT MAP
ALLPACK - 1604 E LAWSON STREET
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
A-3160
FIGURE NO,

WILLIE L. COVINGTON
REGISTER OF DEEDS, DURHAM COUNTY
DURHAM COUNTY COURTHOUSE
200 E. MAIN STREET
DURHAM, NC 27701
PLEASE RETAIN YELLOW TRAILER PAGE
It is part of recorded document, and must be submitted with original for re-recording
and/or cancellation.
Filed For Registration: 09/21/2012 09:17:46 AM
Book: RE 7074 Page: 361-371
Document No.: 2012033331
NOTICE 11 PGS $26.00
Recorder: SHARON M CEARNEL
2012033331

Michael WQag
Project Ma
O"d, ee"z
Candy El ' tt
Staff Scientist
PHASE 1 LIMITED SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
ALLPACK ASSEMBLY
1604 EAST LAWSON STREET
DURHAM, DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NCDENR INCIDENT NO. 39154
Prepared for: ` E 2
17,.
JUL
urham Technical 18 ?0
Y..:,.+ mmuniryr College 12
" iD q
Durham Technical Community College face
1637 Lawson Street
Durham, Durham County, North Carolina
Prepared by:
3201 Spring Forest Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27616
S&ME Project No. 1054-11-195C
l
Thomas P. Itay o , P.E.
Senior Consultant
July 16, 2012

Phase I Limited Site Assessment SWE Project No. 1054-11-195C
Allpack Assembly Durham Durham County North Carolina July 16, 2012
SITE IDENTIFICATION
Site Name:
Site Location:
Incident Number:
Responsible Parry
Former UST:
Current Property Owner:
Consultant:
Release Information:
Source Latitude/Longitude
Allpack Assembly
1604 East Lawson Street
Durham, Durham County, NC
39115
Durham Technical Community College
1637 East Lawson Street
Durham, North Carolina
One 1,000-Gallon Heating Oil (reportedly removed in
early 1990s).
Durham Technical Community College
1637 East Lawson Street
Durham, North Carolina
S&ME, Inc.
Contact: Michael Pfeifer
3201 Spring Forest Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27616
[phone]
Date Discovered: ' October 17, 2011
Estimated Quantity: Unknown
Cause of Release: Possible leaking UST
Licensed Professional Engineer:
35' 54' 02.11" North
780 51' 37.31" West
Thomas P. Raymond, P.E.
CA1?0'a
FESS/p �i•''•.
10
S
a 18760
•S ��,rC�r
F
may''%qS P. R�„/

Phase I Limited Site Assessment SWE Project No. 1054-11-195C
Allpack Assembly, Durham, Durham County, North Carolina July 16, 2012
1.0 SITE HISTORY
The Allpack Assembly, Inc. (Allpack) facility is located at 1604 East Lawson Street in
Durham, Durham County, North Carolina. The site consists of a 4.335-acre parcel
developed with six warehouse buildings with asphalt paved loading dock areas and gravel
parking on the west side of the buildings. Surrounding properties consist of institutional
buildings (Durham Technical Community College) and industrial tracts. A vicinity map
and general site map are provided on Figures 1 and 2, respectively.
Allpack receives general retail merchandise in bulk, stores the merchandise and repackages
it for distribution to various clients including single item mail orders and point of purchase
displays for large commercial retailers.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Initial Abatement Action
On July 22, 2011, S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) prepared a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
(Phase I ESA) for Durham Technical Community College (Durham Tech) as part of an
impending property transaction. According to an interview with the previous property
owner documented in the Phase I ESA, an approximately 1,000-gallon heating oil
underground storage tank (UST) was excavated and removed from the property sometime in
the early 1990s, however, no documentation of the UST removal was provided to S&ME.
The UST was reportedly located in a grassy area between Buildings 1 & 2 and Buildings 3
& 4. The locations of the buildings and the former UST area are shown on Figure 2. No
other USTs or aboveground storage tanks are located on the property.
In October 2011, S&ME prepared an Initial Abatement Action Report documenting soil
and groundwater sampling in the vicinity of the former tank basin, and the removal of
contaminated soil from the former tank basin. Two soil borings, B-1 and B-2, were
advanced to 10 feet below ground surface (ft. bgs) and soil samples were collected from,
each boring at depths of 8.5 and 6 ft. bgs, respectively. Soil samples were analyzed for
total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) diesel range organics (DRO) and gasoline range
organics (GRO). A temporary piezometer was installed at one of the borings and a
groundwater sample was collected. The groundwater sample was analyzed for volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) and semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs). Analytical
results indicated that TPH-DRO was detected at a concentration above the North Carolina
Action Levels in the soil sample collected from boring B-2 at 6 ft. bgs. No VOCs or
SVOCs were reported at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limits in
the groundwater sample collected from the temporary piezometer.
S&ME returned to the site in March 2012 to excavate contaminated soils associated with
the former heating oil UST. Approximately 104 tons of impacted soils were removed
from the site, and eight post -excavation samples were collected from the base and
sidewalls of the excavation. Soil samples were analyzed for TPH DRO and the soil
sample exhibiting the highest TPH DRO detection was subsequently analyzed for volatile
petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH), extractible petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH), and SVOCs.
Analytical results indicated that VPH/EPH was reported at a concentration in excess of
4

Phase I Limited Site Assessment SWE Project No. 1054-11-195C
Allpack Assembly, Durham, Durham County, North Carolina July 16 2012
3.0 RECEPTOR INFORMATION
S&ME, Inc., (S&ME) performed a receptor survey in general accordance with the
NCDENR Guidelines for Assessment and Correction Action, December 2008
(Guidelines). The Limited Site Assessment Risk Classification and Land Use Form is
included in Appendix II. Information pertaining to the receptors identified within 1,500
feet of the subject site is summarized below. Figure 3 shows the locations of adjacent
property owners. No water supply wells were identified in the vicinity.
3.1 Water Supply Wells
On June 12, 2012, S&ME personnel conducted a site reconnaissance and receptor survey
for the Allpack Assembly site. Letters requesting water supply well information were
mailed to 61 addresses located within 1,500 feet north of the subject site. To date, 21
surveys have been returned. One water supply well (WSW-1), located at 619 Troy
Avenue, was identified by the property owner, Jacqueline S. Brown. According to the
survey, the well is not used and the property is connected to public water. The well is
located approximately 1,300 ft. from the source area. If information is received by
S&ME that requires an update to the receptor survey, S&ME will submit an addendum to
this report. A copy of the Request for Water Supply Well Information Letter and the
responses to the letter received by S&ME are included in Appendix III. No water
supply wells were identified during the site reconnaissance.
3.2 Public Water Supplies
S&ME personnel observed fire hydrants and water meters along the streets located within
1,500 feet of the subject property. According to the City of Durham Water Resources
Department, potable water is available to all properties within 1,500 feet of the site. The
City of Durham receives its water from the Lake Michie reservoir. At its nearest point,
Lake Michie is located approximately 13 miles northeast of the subject site.
3.3 Surface Water
According to the 2002 Southwest Durham NC USGS Quadrangle Map, and S&ME's site
reconnaissance, an unnamed stream lies approximately 1,300 ft. southeast of the subject
property.
3.4 Wellhead Protection Areas
S&ME personnel accessed the NCDENR Wellhead Protection Program website at
http://www.deh.enr.state.nc.us/pws/wellhead/u-pdate/al)l)roved_ wellheadJ)lans htm on

Phase I Limited Site Assessment SWE Project- - No. 1054 11 195C
Aback Assembly Durham Durham County North Carolina July 16 2012
June 29, 2012. According to the website, the site is not located within a designated
protected wellhead area.
3.5 Subsurface Structures
A small drainage ditch is located on the site and drains to the east of the site. Municipal
water and sewer lines run along Lawson and Cooper Streets to the north and south of the
site. No other subsurface structures, such as vaults or basements, were identified on the
site or adjacent properties.
3.6 Property Owners and Occupants
The names and addresses of the property owners and occupants within and contiguous to
the site are summarized in Table 1. These properties are identified numerically on the
Adjacent Owner map which is included as Figure 3.
According to the City of Durham Planning Department Zoning Atlas website, accessed
on June 21, 2012, the site and properties to the north, east, and west are zoned light
industrial (IL), and the properties to the south are zones office institutional (OI) and
residential urban (RU).
3.7 Risk Classification
Based on the information from the receptor survey and the groundwater analytical results
from MW-1, the site meets the criteria for "Low Risk", however, the NCDENR will
make the risk determination for the site.
f=�

Phase I Limited Site Assessment S&ME Project No. 1054-11-195C
Allpack Assembly Durham, Durham County, North Carolina July 10 —A2
4.0 SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
S&ME reviewed the Geologic Map of North Carolina dated 1985. The site is located
within the Piedmont Physiographic Province and more specifically in the Durham
Triassic Basin of the Triassic Newark Group. The Durham Basin was formed during
rifting in the early Mesozoic geologic age and was filled with deposits of fluvial and
lacustrine origin during the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic periods. Based on the
Geologic map of southeast Durham, the parent bedrock at the subject site is comprised of
sandstone with interbedded siltstone. Typically the sandstones will weather to coarser
grained silts and sands with the siltstones weathering to fine-grained silts and clays. Also
common in the Durham Triassic Basin are numerous intrusions of diabase dikes and sills.
Dikes are usually steeply dipping to vertical and can extend up to several miles in length.
�! 4.1 Soil Lithology
S&ME personnel accessed the United States Department of Agriculture website at
<h!W://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/> on June 29, 2012. According to the internet based
Soil Survey of Durham County, North Carolina, prepared by the United States
Department of Agriculture and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (1976),
surficial soils in the vicinity of the site have been classified as White Store sandy loam.
The White Store soils are reportedly moderately well drained with slopes of two to ten
percent. The typical profile of these soils consists of a surface layer of sandy loam and
subsoil of very firm clay or silty clay. White Store soils formed under forest vegetation,
in material weathered from Triassic Mudstone. The depth to bedrock for White Store
soils is reported to be greater than 4 feet:
-� Soils encountered during the June 7, 2012 monitor well installation consisted of gravel
fill material from the ground surface to a depth of approximately eight feet below ground
surface, which was placed into the soil excavation in March 2012. Dense silt, typical of
-� the Triassic Basin, was encountered directly below the fill to a termination depth of 35 ft.
bgs. Soils encountered during the excavation consisted of sandy silt and dense silt. A
copy of the well construction record for monitor well MW-1 is included in Appendix IV.
4.2 Groundwater Flow
S&ME personnel used an electronic water level indicator to measure the depth -to -
groundwater from the top of the groundwater monitoring well MW-1 on June 7, 2012.
Groundwater was measured at 29.7 ft bgs at the time of boring (TOB) and measured at
29.66 ft bgs feet below top of casing (ft BTOC) prior to sampling (June 8, 2012). The
groundwater level measurement and monitor well construction data are summarized in
Table 2. Since only one groundwater monitor well has been installed at the site,
1 groundwater flow direction cannot be accurately evaluated. Based upon the topography at
the site it appears that groundwater may flow to the south.
0

Phase I Limited Site Assessment SWE Project No. 1054-11-195C
Allpack Assembly, Durham, Durham County North Carolina July 16 2012
5.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
The project was performed under a site -specific health and safety plan prepared by
S&ME. Field activities were performed in general accordance with the procedures
outlined in the Guidelines. The investigative derived wastes (IDW), such as soil cuttings,
decontamination water, and purge water, that were generated during the field activities
were disposed in accordance with the procedures specified in the Guidelines. The purge
water and soil cuttings were spread on the ground at the site.
Equipment used to advance the borings and to collect samples was decontaminated
before and after its use to minimize the potential transfer of contaminated media.
5.1 Monitor Well Installation
On June 7, 2012, S&ME installed one monitoring well, MW-1, at the site. The
monitoring well was installed using a track -mounted Geoprobe® with the ability to turn 4
1/4-inch diameter hollow -stem augers and air rotary capabilities. The soil boring for MW-
1 was advanced in the area of the former UST. Figure 4 presents the monitor well
location. The boring log and Non -Residential Well Construction Record (NCDENR Form
GW-lb) for MW-1 are included in Appendix IV.
During the advancement of the boring, auger refusal was encountered at approximately 8
ft. bgs. The tooling on the Geoprobe was switched to air hammer equipment to facilitate
drilling into more consolidated material. Indications of perched groundwater were
observed at a depth of approximately 8 feet below ground surface. The boring was
advanced to a final depth of 35 ft. bgs.
Monitoring well MW-1 was installed using a 15-foot long section of two-inch diameter
polyvinyl chloride (PVC) slotted (0.010-inch) screen and sufficient riser pipe to bring the
well to the ground surface. The well was completed by placing #2 filter sand in the
boring annulus to two feet above the screen -section (sand pack). Approximately four feet
of hydrated bentonite was tremied above the sand pack, and neat cement grout was then
tremied from the top of the bentonite to approximately six inches below ground surface.
The new well extends to the ground surface where it was encased with a flush -mounted
protective steel casing with a bolted manhole cover. A concrete pad was used to finish
the surface of the well. The monitor well construction details are summarized in Table 2.
The monitor well was installed to a total depth of 35 feet below ground surface. The
static water level was measured at the time of well completion at a depth of 29.20 feet
below the top of casing (TOC).
5.2 Groundwater Sampling
On June 8, 2012, S&ME collected a groundwater sample from MW-1. Prior to
sampling, the well was purged by evacuating groundwater from the well until the
groundwater became relatively clear using a new polyethylene bailer. Approximately
two casing volumes of water was removed from the well, at which time the well was dry.

Phase I Limited Site Assessment SWE Project No. 1054-11-195C
Aback Assembly, Durham, Durham County North Carolina July 16 2012
iField parameters were measured after each well volume was purged for pH, temperature,
and specific conductance. The well was allowed to recharge and a groundwater sample
was collected from the monitor well using a new, disposable bailer.
Containers provided by the laboratory were filled directly from the bailer, labeled, and
placed in an insulated cooler with ice for transport to the laboratory for analysis. Field
measurement sheets are included in Appendix V.
Sample management was documented from collection through delivery to Environmental
Science Corporation (ESC) in Mt. Juliette, Tennessee, a North Carolina certified
laboratory, for analysis following standard chain -of -custody procedures. The
groundwater sample from MW-1 was analyzed for selected VOCs by EPA Method
6200B, for SVOCs by EPA Method 625, for VPH/EPH by the Massachusetts Department
of Environmental Protection (MADEP) Methods.
5.3 Groundwater Sampling Results
The laboratory analytical results for groundwater sample MW-1 indicated that one
targeted constituent, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, was detected above the 2L Standard. Bis
(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate is used in the production of PVC, and is not associated with a
petroleum release (see EPA factsheet located at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/uatw/hlthef/eth-
phth.html).
A summary of the groundwater analytical results is presented in Table 3 and Figure 4.
A copy of the laboratory analytical results and chain of custody form is included in
Appendix VI.
10

Phase I Limited Site Assessment SWE Project No. 1054-11-195C
Allpack Assembly, Durham, Durham County North Carolina July 16 2012
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
S&ME has completed this Phase T Limited Site Assessment, in general accordance with
the UST Section Guidelines for Assessment and Corrective Action for UST Releases,
dated July 15, 2008. The findings at the site are as follows:
• The results of a Phase I ESA indicated that a 1,000-gallon heating oil tank had
been removed from the site in the 1990s; however, no documentation of proper
closure was located.
• An Initial Abatement Action Report completed in October 2011 and March 2012
indicated that TPH-DRO was reported in concentrations exceeding the Action
Levels and VPH/EPH was reported at concentrations exceeding MSCCs in soil
samples collected from the former tank basin.
• S&ME installed and sampled one monitor well, MW-1, in the former UST basin.
Based on the laboratory analytical results of the groundwater sample collected
from monitor well MW-1, groundwater at the site has not been impacted by
petroleum hydrocarbons.
• The results of the receptor survey indicated that one private water supply well
(WSW-1) is located within 1,500 feet of the site. The well is approximately 1,300
feet from the site, is not in use, and the home is connected to municipal water.
S&ME recommends site closure with land use restrictions for soil.
11

N
a
F
b
6
.o
c
Id
H
N
3
0
0
0
�a
0
0
p
0
j
0
on to
y�
9 U
H w w
b O 0
oa
o H
6� o
U
D y
y w cn Q
wozz
- Z
�w
N In <h

O
Q��z
M
�kn
rW-1
a A 3
c o
(D `�
o
�xo
ava
o ��az
a
a
A
V]

LEGEND
S APPROXIMATE MONITOR WELL LOCATION
IMAGE SOURCE: NC ONEMAP, DATED 2010
1"=100'
JULY 2012 S&ME
BY: BTR
VMM.SMEINC.COM
T N0: NC ENGINEER LICENSE #F-0176
1054-11-195C 3201 SPRING FOREST RD, RALEIGH, NC 27616
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
( IN FEET )
SITE MAP
ALLPACK - 1604 E LAWSON STREET
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
A-3158
FIGURE

LEGEND -
APPROXIMATE WATER SUPPLY WELL LOCATION GRAPHIC SCALE
10 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER ID NUMBER 250 0 125 250 Soo
( IN FEET )
IMAGE SOURCE: NC ONEMAP, DATED 2010 A-3159
SCALE: 1„ _ 500
DATE: JULY 2012 S&ME RECEPTOR SURVEY MAP WITH FIGURE NO.
DRAWN BY: BTR ^_,� ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS 3
WWW.SMEINC.COM ALLPACK- 1604 E LAWSON STREET
PROJECT NO: NC ENGINEER LICENSE #F-0176 DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
1054-11-195C 3201 SPRING FOREST RD, RALEIGH, NC 27616

LEGEND GRAPHIC SCALE
APPROXIMATE MONITOR WELL LOCATION so a 25 so 100
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE COLLECTED JUNE 8, 2012
* INDICATES EXCDEEDENCE OF 2L STANDARD ( IN FEET )
IMAGE SOURCE: NC ONEMAP, DATED 2010
1" = 100,
J2 S&ME
Y: BTR BTR WWW.SMEINC.COM
NO: NC ENGINEER LICENSE 9F-0176
1054-11-195C 3201 SPRING FOREST RD, RALEIGH, NC 27616
GROUNDWATER CONSTITUENT MAP-
ALLPACK - 1604 E LAWSON STREET
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
A-3160
FIGURE NO.

=U-
November 3, 2011
Durham Technical Community College
1637 E. Lawson Street
Durham, North Carolina 27703
Attention: Ms. Wanda Maggart via email: maagartRc durhamtech edu
Senior Vice President
Reference: Limited Phase II Soil and Groundwater Assessment
Allpack Assembly, Inc. (Former Fairey Finishing Plant)
1604 E. Lawson Street
Durham, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 1054-11-195A
Dear Ms. Maggart:
S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) has completed a Limited Phase II Soil and Groundwater Assessment
at the above -referenced site located in Durham, North Carolina. This report presents 1)
project information, 2) scope of services, 3) results, and 4) our conclusions based on the
site observations and analytical reports. Our scope of services were performed according
to S&ME's Change Order Proposal No. 1054-11-195 (Change Order 1) and dated October
5, 2011 between Durham Technical Community College (Durham Tech) and S&ME. This
report, Limited Phase 11 Soil and Groundwater Assessment, includes the assessment results
from the soil and groundwater sampling conducted on October 17, 2011.
PROJECT INFORMATION
S&ME completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Report for the Allpack
Assembly Inc. site (report dated July 22, 2011, S&ME Project No. 1054-11-195). The
following recognized environmental condition (REC) was identified during the Phase I
ESA:
An approximately 1, 000-gallon UST for heating oil was previously located on the
property.
At the request of Durham Tech, S&ME prepared a Scope of Services (S&ME Proposal No.
1054-11-195A, Change Order No. 1, dated October 5, 2011) to conduct a limited soil and
groundwater assessment at the site to evaluate possible shallow soil and groundwater
impacts from the former 1,000-gallon heating oil underground storage tank (UST). The
Scope of Services for the limited soil and groundwater assessment was approved by
Durham Tech on October 7, 2011. Figure 1 shows the site vicinity and Figure 2 shows
the subject site.
S&ME, INC. / 3201 Spring Forest Road / Raleigh, NC 27616 / p 919.872.2660 /f9l9.876.3958/www.smeinc.com

Limited Phase II Soil and Groundwater Assessment Report SWE Project No.,1054-11-195A
Allnark Ascamh1y1n irham Tarh Sits ni irham hr Ain amhar 99n1 i
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Task 1 — Scope Preparation, Health & Safety
The Scope of Services were designed to address potential soil and groundwater
contamination from the former 1,000-gallon heating oil UST by conducting soil and
groundwater sampling at two locations on the subject site. Prior to site activities, S&ME
prepared a site -specific health and safety plan (HASP), notified North Carolina One -Call to
have subsurface utilities marked and hired a private utility locator for additional subsurface
utility location, and scheduled the limited assessment activities for October 17, 2011.
Task 2 - Limited Phase II Soil and Groundwater Assessment
Soil Assessment
On October 17, 2011, S&ME utilized a track -mounted Geoprobe® that uses hydraulic
pressure to advance a stainless steel macrocore sampler with internal five-foot long acetate
q sampling tubes to advance two soil borings below the ground surface at the site (labeled as
1 B-1 and B-2). The borings were advanced in the area of the former 1,000-gallon heating
oil UST, as indicated to S&ME during the Phase I ESA by Mr. Fairey, the property
owner's representative. The boring locations are indicated on Figure 3. Soils recovered in
1 the sample tubes were visually classified on -site by S&ME personnel. Grass and
vegetation and natural organic topsoil were encountered in the upper portion of borings
from the ground surface to depths of 0.5 feet below ground surface (ft-bgs)]. Sandy silts
were encountered in the soil borings to termination depths of 10 ft-bgs in each of the soil
borings.
A photo -ionization detector (PID) was used to scan the soil samples in the field for
indication of possible contaminants. A summary of the field soil screening measurements
and lithologic descriptions and PID readings of the soils encountered during the
installation of the soil borings are included as an attachment. The sample exhibiting the
highest readings on the PID from each of the soil borings was selected for laboratory
analysis.
One soil sample from each soil boring (labeled as S-1 from boring 13-1 and S-2 from
boring B-2) were collected into laboratory=supplied containers, placed in an insulated
cooler with ice for transport to the laboratory for analysis. Soil sample S-1 was collected
from a depth of approximately 8.5 ft-bgs and S-2 was collected at a depth of approximately
6 ft.-bgs. Sample management was documented from collection through delivery to
Environmental Science Corporation (ESC), a North Carolina certified laboratory for
analysis following standard chain -of -custody procedures. The soil samples were analyzed
for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) diesel range organics (DRO) and gasoline range
organics (GRO) by EPA Method 8015 5030/3550.
Groundwater Assessment
At one of the soil boring locations (B-1), the Geoprobe© rig was used to advance the
boring into the upper -most groundwater table so that a groundwater sample could be

Limited Phase II Soil and Groundwater Assessment Report
A11S2ME Project No. 1054-11-195A
n 6 A-....—Ll..11l.._L-_ r__� ....— _ ..�
collected. Groundwater was encountered in the soil boring at approximately nine ft-bgs.
A temporary piezometer (two-inch PVC well screen and conductor casing) was placed in
the boring for sample collection at depths of approximately 10 ft-bgs.
Soil boring B-2 was converted into temporary groundwater monitoring point by installing
a five foot section of two-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) slotted (0.010-inch)
screen into the boring and adding sufficient riser pipe to bring the temporary sampling
point above ground surface.
The groundwater sample (labeled as B-2) was collected from temporary piezometer B-2
using a new polyethylene bailer. Containers provided by the laboratory were filled directly
from the bailer, labeled, and placed in an insulated cooler with ice for transport to the
laboratory for analysis. Sample management was documented from collection through
delivery to ESC for analysis following standard chain -of -custody procedures. The
groundwater sample was analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA
Method 602 and poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by EPA Method 8270.
After collection of the groundwater sample, the temporary well was closed by removing
the PVC well materials and filling the borehole with bentonite pellets and soil.
Investigative derived wastes (IDW), such as soil cuttings generated during the soil boring
advancement and groundwater sampling, were disposed of in accordance with the
procedures specified by NCDENR. Specifically, the soil cuttings were spread and the
purged groundwater poured onto the ground surface.
Task 3 — Report
S&ME prepared this report to summarize the findings of the soil and groundwater
assessment and laboratory analysis. Figure 1 shows the site vicinity and Figure 3 shows
the subject site and the locations where soil and groundwater samples were collected. The
soil and groundwater samples were collected using a Geoprobe®. The attached boring
logs provide lithologic descriptions and PID readings of the soils encountered in the
borings. This report also contains the laboratory data report.
RESULTS
Soil Sampling Results
The laboratory analytical results of the soil samples collected from the soil borings
indicated that TPH-DRO was detected at a concentration of 27 milligrams per kilogram
(mg/Kg), in soil sample S-2, which exceeds the North Carolina UST Action Level of 10
mg/Kg. Concentrations of TPH-GRO did not exceed the laboratory's detection limits in
soil sample S-2. In addition, TPH-DRO and TPH-GRO were below the laboratory's
detection limits in soil sample S-1 collected from soil boring B-1. A summary of the soil
analytical results is included in Table 1, and the laboratory analytical report is included as
an attachment.

I
Limited Phase 11 Soil and Groundwater Assessment Report SWE Project No. 1054-11-195A
Allnark Arxcamhly/nurham Tarh Siff-. rinrham Nr Nn amhPr 9 7n11
Groundwater Sampling Results
The laboratory analytical results for the groundwater samples collected from temporary
piezometer 13-1 indicated that no VOCs or PAHs were present above the laboratory
method detection limits. As a point of reference, the detected constituentss are -are
compared to Nerth Earelina groundwater quality standards promulgated by Title 15A of
the North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2L (15A NCAC 2L). A summaryof
the laboratory analytical report is included on Table 2 and a copy of the laboratory
analysis report is included as an attachment.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
S&ME has completed a limited soil and groundwater sampling program in general
accordance with the October 5, 2011 Scope of Services.
The results of the soil assessment indicated TPH-DRO was detected in soil sample S-2
(collected from soil boring B-2) in a concentration exceeding the North Carolina Action
Level. TPH-GRO was not detected above the laboratory's detection limits in B-1, and
TPH-DRO and TPH-GRO were not detected above the laboratory's detection limits in the
soil sample collected from B-1.
The results of the groundwater assessment indicated that no VOCs or PAHs were detected
in the groundwater sample collected from temporary piezometer B-2.
The detection of TPH-DRO in soil sample S-2 (collected from B-2 at a depth of
approximately 6 ft-bgs) is indicative of a release from the former 1,000-gallon heating oil
UST at the site. Since the soil sample results present a detection of contamination, the
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) requires
notification. The notification is required from the owner, operator or responsible party. In
addition, S&ME recommends an excavation of the soils in the vicinity of the former UST.
S&ME will prepare a separate proposal for the soil excavation and. post -excavation
confirmatory soil sampling.
This report and its conclusions are limited to the area where the assessment was conducted
and does not represent a comprehensive assessment of the entire site.

Initial Abatement Action Report S&ME Project No. 1054-11-1958
Allpack Assembly, Inc.
Durham, Durham County, North Carolina March 28, 2012
1.0 SITE IDENTIFICATION
Site Name: Allpack Assembly, Inc. (Former Fairey Finishing Plant)
Site Location: 1604 E. Lawson Street
Durham, Durham County, North Carolina
Incident Number: Not Assigned
Current UST Owner: None— 1,000-gallon heating oil UST removed in early
1990s
Current Property Owner: Trustees of Durham Technical Community College
1637 E. Lawson Street
Durham, North Carolina 27703
Consultant: S&ME, Inc.
3201 Spring Forest Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27616
Mr. Michael Pfeifer
[phone]
Release Information: Date Discovered: October 2011
Estimated Quantity: Unknown
Cause of Release: Unknown
Source Latitude/Longitude: 35° 58' 02.11" North
78' 52' 55.51" West
Licensed Professional Engineer:
�L�tit��N/�1�nnrygya,�
H C q'4p''�,
O;OFESS/p2��'
EAL
= s 8760 o
O�GINE�Q-: O=
S p: R'N
ly
/
11
� IIIl f111111111111
Thomas P. Raymond, P.E., S&ME, Inc.

Initial Abatement.Action Report
S&ME Project No. 1054-11-1958
Allpack Assembly, Inc.
i Durham, Durham County, North Carolina. March 28, 2012
2.0 SITE HISTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION
The Allpack Assembly, Inc. (Allpack) facility is located at 1604 East Lawson Street in
Durham, Durham County, North Carolina. The site consists of a 4.335-acre parcel
developed with six warehouse buildings with asphalt paved loading dock areas and gravel
parking on the west side of the buildings. Surrounding properties consist of institutional
buildings (Durham Technical Community College) and industrial tracts. A vicinity map
and general site map are provided on Figures 1 and 2, respectively.
Allpack receives general retail merchandise in bulk, stores the merchandise and repackages
it for distribution to various clients including single item mail orders and point of purchase
displays for large commercial retailers.
On July 22, 2011, S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) prepared a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
(Phase I ESA) for Durham Technical Community College (Durham Tech) as part of an
impending property transaction. According to an interview with the previous property
owner documented in the Phase I ESA, an approximate 1,000-gallon heating oil
underground storage tank (UST) was excavated and removed from the property sometime in
the early 1990s, however, no documentation of the UST removal was provided to S&ME.
The UST was reportedly located in a grassy area between Buildings 1 & 2 and Buildings 3
& 4. The locations of the buildings and the former UST area are shown on Figure 2. No
other USTs or aboveground storage tanks are located on the property. Limited historical
information is provided in Appendix I.
S&ME reviewed the Geologic Map of North Carolina dated 1985. The site is located
within the Piedmont Physiographic Province and more specifically in the Durham
Triassic Basin of the Triassic Newark Group. The Durham Basin was formed during
rifting in the early Mesozoic geologic age and was filled with deposits of fluvial and
lacustrine origin during the Late Triassic and Early Jurassic periods. Based on the
Geologic map of southeast Durham, the parent bedrock at the subject site is comprised of
sandstone with interbedded siltstone. Typically the sandstones will weather to coarser
grained silts and sands with the. siltstones weathering to fine-grained silts and clays. Also
common in the Durham Triassic Basin are numerous intrusions of diabase dikes and sills.
Dikes are usually steeply dipping to vertical and can extend up to several miles in length.
S&ME reviewed the Durham County Soil and Water Conservation District Soil Survey,
issued in 1977, to obtain soil classification information for the subject site. The subject
site lies in an area consisting mainly of Mayodan and White Store sandy loam. The
survey indicated that the Mayodan and White Store soils consist of nearly level to
moderately steep, well -drained soils on uplands. The landscape is one of rounded divides
and steep side slopes. Mayodan and White Store soils formed under forest vegetation, in
material weathered from Triassic Mudstone. The depth to bedrock for Mayodan and
White Store soils is reported to be greater than 4 feet.

Initial Abatement Action Report S&ME Project No. 1054-11-195B
Allpack Assembly, Inc.
Durham, Durham County, North Carolina March 28, 2012
Soils encountered in the soil borings consisted of sandy silts to termination depths of 10 ft-
bgs. The surrounding properties consist of other light industrial and institutional uses.
3

Initial Abatement Action Report S&ME Project No. 1054-11-195B
Allpack Assembly, Inc.
Durham, Durham County, North Carolina March 28, 2012
3.0 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES
3.1 Soil and Groundwater Sampling- October 17, 2011
On October 17, 2011, S&ME conducted a Limited Phase II Investigation (LSI) in the
area of the former 1,000-gallon heating oil UST. S&ME advanced two soil borings to 10
feet below ground surface (ft.-bgs) utilizing a track -mounted Geoprobe®. One soil
sample was collected from each of the soil borings at depths of 8.5 ft-bgs and 6 ft-bgs,
respectively. The soil samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH)
gasoline range organics (GRO) and diesel range organics (DRO) by EPA Methods 8015
5030/3550. Soil boring locations are shown on Figure 3.
At one of the soil boring locations (B-1), the Geoprobe® rig was used to advance the
boring into the upper -most groundwater table so that a groundwater sample could be
collected. Groundwater was encountered in the soil boring at approximately nine ft-bgs.
A temporary piezometer (two-inch PVC well screen and conductor casing) was placed in
the boring for sample collection at depths of approximately 10 ft-bgs. The groundwater
sample (labeled as B-2) was collected from temporary piezometer B-2 and analyzed for
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 602 and poly aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) by EPA Method 8270.
3.2'. Soil and Groundwater Sampling Results- October 17, 2011
The laboratory analytical results of the soil samples collected from the soil borings
indicated that TPH-DRO was detected at a concentration of 27 milligrams per kilogram
(mg/Kg), in soil sample S-2, which exceeds the North Carolina. UST Action Level of 10
mg/Kg. Concentrations of TPH-GRO did not exceed the laboratory's detection limits in
soil sample S-2. In addition, TPH-DRO and TPH-GRO were below the laboratory's
detection limits in soil sample S-1 collected from soil boring B-1. A summary of the soil
analytical results is included in Table 1, and the laboratory analytical report is included
as Appendix IV.
The laboratory analytical results for the groundwater sample collected from temporary
piezometer B-1 indicated that no VOCs or PAHs were present above the laboratory
method detection limits. A summary of the groundwater analytical report is included on
Table 2 and a copy of the laboratory analysis report is included as Appendix IV.
3.3 Soil Excavation— March 1 - 2, 2012
S&ME returned to the site on March 1 and 2, 2012 to excavate contaminated soils. The
excavation was performed by S&ME's excavation subcontractor, EP&S of Vermont
(EPS). Prior to the start of the excavation, subsurface utilities were located and marked
by Bateman Civil Survey.
The excavation area was approximately 22 feet long by 18 feet wide, and extended from
3 to 8 feet deep. While extending the excavation westward, fill material was encountered _
4

Initial Abatement Action Report S&ME Project No. 1054-11-195B
Allpack Assembly, Inc.
Durham, Durham County, North Carolina March 28, 2012
in what was likely the former tank basin. The fill appeared to be soils mixed with trash
and debris; petroleum odor and staining were observed. The excavation was continued to
approximately 8 ft.-bgs, until competent rock was encountered. The southern boundary
of the excavation was extended to approximately 3 feet from the building, at which point
native soils were encountered. The western and northern extent of the excavation were
extended until native soils were encountered, at which point confirmation soil samples
were collected. Groundwater was not encountered during the excavation of the
contaminated soils. The soil excavation was performed using a track -mounted backhoe
and loading equipment. The excavated soils were temporarily stockpiled on -site, then
directly loaded onto trucks for transportation and off -site disposal. A photographic log of
the excavation is included in Appendix II. Approximately 104 tons of petroleum
contaminated soils were excavated and removed from the site. The soils were transported
to Soilworks. Inc., a North Carolina permitted facility, in Selma, North Carolina for
disposal. Copies of the weigh tickets and soil disposal manifests are included in
Appendix III. The excavation was backfilled with clean imported fill material and
compacted with a backhoe to the original surface grade.
S&ME collected 8 post -excavation soil samples from the sidewalls (SW-N, SW -NE, SW -
SE, SW -NW, SW -SW, and SW-s), and base (B-N and B-S) of the excavation pit (Figure
4). The soil samples were collected directly from the bucket of the excavation equipment
using new nitrile gloves. Samples were screened using a photoionization detector to
evaluate the impacts to the soils and determine the extent of the excavation.
The soil samples were collected into laboratory supplied containers and shipped under
chain of custody to ESC Lab Sciences, a North Carolina certified laboratory. These
samples were analyzed for TPH gasoline -range organics (GRO) and diesel -range
organics (DRO). Pending the results of the TPH GRO/DRO analysis, the sample with the
highest reported detections (B-N) was analyzed for risk -based parameters, which includes
volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH) and extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH)
by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) method,
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA method 8260, and semi -volatile organic
compounds (SVOCs) by EPA method 8270.
3.4 Soil Excavation Sample Results — March 1 - 2, 2012
The laboratory analytical results of soil samples B-N, B-S, SW -SE, SW -NE, and SW-N
reported detections of TPH above the North Carolina Action Level of 10 mg/kg.
Additionally, laboratory analytical results for sample B-N, which exhibited the highest
detection of TPH, reported VPH/EPH carbon fractions C9-C18 and C9-C22 above the
Residential Maximum Contaminant Soil Concentrations (MSCCs). A summary of the
soil analytical results and a comparison to NCDENR's standards is shown on Table 1,
and a map indicating soil sample locations and detections is shown on Figure 4. The
laboratory analytical report and chain of custody forms are included in Appendix IV.

Initial Abatement Action Report S&ME Project No. 1054-11-195B
Allpack Assembly, Inc.
Durham, Durham County, North Carolina March 28, 2012
4.0 CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
S&ME has completed this Initial Abatement Action Report, in general accordance with
the UST Section Guidelines for the Investigation and Remediation of Contamination
from Non -UST Petroleum Releases, dated July 1, 2007. A copy of the UST- 61 24-Hour
Notification of Discharge Form, which was filed by S&ME for Allpack, is included as
Appendix V. The findings at the site are as follows:
• One 1,000 gallon heating oil UST was closed by removal in the early 1990's,
although no documentation of the closure was provided.
• Results of the Phase II LSI in October 2011 indicated that TPH-DRO was
reported at a concentration exceeding the Action Level in boring B-2 (soil sample
S-2). The laboratory analytical results of a groundwater sample collected from a
temporary piezometer installed in boring B-2 indicated that no VOCs or PAHs
were detected in the sample.
• On March 1 and 2, 2012, approximately 104 tons of impacted soils were removed
from the former UST basin and surrounding area. Eight confirmation soil samples
were collected from the base and sidewalls of the excavation.
The laboratory analytical results indicated detections of TPH GRO/DRO above
the North Carolina Action Levels in five samples; B-N, B-S, SW -SE, SW -NE,
and SW-N. Additional laboratory analysis of soil sample B-N reported detections
of carbon fractions C9-C-18 and C9-C22 above the Residential MSCCs.
Impacted soil remains and appears that it may be confined in the vicinity of the
former UST.
In accordance with the North Carolina UST Section Guidelines for Assessment and
Corrective Action, S&ME recommends conducting a Phase I Limited Site Assessment to
determine if groundwater at the site has been impacted by the apparent release from the
former heating oil UST, and to determine the risk ranking for the site.
6

LEGEND GRAPHIC SCALE
• SAMPLE LOCATION is 0 7.5 15 30
ug/L - MICROGRAMS PER LITER
mg/Kg - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM ( IN FEET )
BDL - BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
TPH-DRO - TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS - DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS
TPH-GRO - TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS - GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS
(6.0') - SAMPLE DEPTH - FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE
* INDICATES EXCEEDENCE OF NC ACTION LEVEL
SOIL & GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED OCT. 17, 2011
IMAGE SOURCE: NC ONEMAP, DATED 2010
1 DATE' MARCH 2012
JDRAWN BY: BTR
1054-11-195B
*S&ME SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
WITH CONSTITUENTS - OCT. 2011
WWW.SMEINC.COM ALLPACK - 1604 E LAWSON STREET
ENGINEER LICENSEDURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
)1 SPRING FOREST RD, RAL RALEIGH, NC 27616
A-2994
FIGURE NO.
0,

LEGEND
• SAMPLE LOCATION
m91K9 - MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM
TPH-DRO - TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS - DIESEL RANGE ORGANICS
TPH-GRO - TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS - GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS
(7.0') - SAMPLE DEPTH - FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE
" INDICATES EXCEEDENCE OF INC ACTION LEVEL OR MSCC GRAPHIC SCALE
SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED MARCH 2, 2012
15 0 7.5 15 30
IMAGE SOURCE: NC ONEMAP, DATED 2010 ( IN FEET )
SCALE: 1 „ = 30' A-2980
*S&ME
DATE: EXCAVATION AREA AND SOIL FIGURE N0.
DRAWN BY: BTR
MARCH 2O12 SAMPLE RESULTS MAP -March 2012 PROJECT NO: 4WWW.SMEINC.COM ALLPACK - 1604 E LAWSON STREET
NC ENGINEER LICENSE #F-0176 DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA
1054-11-195B 3201 SPRING FOREST RD, RALEIGH, NC 27616

Fn'
u �9
F 9
r/1 4
•tar�nz�F
•� U
w w w a
�d
u q
In
'�
Mum=
o0
j.
v
v
sapsgdrlV SID +
eqn v
A Qq
C O+
w
m
a h
au 7eq q eu
u
u
in
v
_
'EEw
x
a
x
a
z
z
s
R
O
O
auazua97,fy7amr -ti
y
N
c
Vl
aG
r
CO
O
uazuyjaj��g{7,Cdoad-
c
'
cv, �
k NF„ � •auan�o pCdo.rdasr
auazua4[�7u4-a�s
o
F
m y
auazua97 nq'u
N
„y
c
Oil
-
Sa, `Ni."�.,.•� t�
c�
m
aA0
In
-k?Otdi
✓'�..
yk«�y3 �+S44'.4ydj ryy�
�i ��WY:1 ��'Yd�k .F� ��N 1""J�
A A fAi
:1'fw11�:
�b��V1
1 m �
4 t4'. 4:•
�yy1 oda0 {i �i
(;{ Dom. "
xfiy 7 •S3' R1y1 �y Y id3H 1�,,�
fIL��' jk. 2S t� +t•
N
O
C
N
�t
1�
a-xa.f.{'
.j] o o ^ o;!
•y
,+i
4�a
��0'il •����}�
!
�y�. FYI t�fi
-
f�•" �� C�f��� W �>Y�
{
Ir a,
xa* v
"CS i yp Jti'Y'�` 9 7
OF G
P'^` [}yayyyy{{T
.N.
.N.
N
N
Nr„i
w S¢
iFt���,,,>�L ii
r' ity�I U
l-Z
l-
'�M9t
,f 7aq�r/
f t�
�YF f f he I

bleases
NC
Name:
'his form should be completed and submitted to the UST Section's regional office following a known or suspectea relautm
an underground storage tank (UST) system. This form is required release submitted within 24 hours of discovery of a known or
susDect
Former Fairey
1604 East Lawson Street
Suspected Contamination? (YIN) Y
Confirmed GW Contamination? (YIN) N
• Confirmed Soil Contamination ?(YIN) Y
~` Samples Taken?(Y/N) __
Ir Free Product? (Y/N) NL_ If Yes, State Greatest
INCIDENT DESCRIPTION
Facillty ID Number. Unknown
Date Leak DiscoveredDcj,2QJL—
Comm/Non-Commerd8l? Comm.
Reg/Non-regulated? Non-Ret:,�
ing Plant
County: Durham
Fayetteville,
rn: Durham Zip Code: 27703 ale�gh, Washington, Wilmington, Winston-Salem
(dedmei degrees): Longitude (dedmel deg—) :-78.882161 Obtained by:
35.973217 se: priciuding but not limited to: nature
ascribe suspected 3 confirmed releaof release, date of release, amount ® GPS
se amount of free product prosent and recoveryefforts initial res ones conducted, Impacts to race tors ❑ Topographic map
;sence of a former 1,000-gallon heating oil UST was confirmed from an interview with the former ❑ GIs Address matching
•y owner during a Phase I ESA for an impending property transaction. The UST was reportedly
A in the early 1990s. Two soil borings were advanced in the area of the former UST in October ❑ Other
Soil samples collected from the soil borings indicated that TPH-DRO was present in a concentration ❑ Unknown
ing the Action Level in one of the soil borings. The nature and date of the release is unknown. Describe location:
HOW RELEASE WAS DISCOVERED (Release code)
(Check one)
lease Detection Equipment or Methods
ring UST Closure/Removal
)party Transfer
ource of Release
rck one to Indicate primary
source)
ank
liping
lispenser
submersible Turbine Pump
)elivery Problem
)ther
Jnknown
itions presented on reverse
ersh�—
unicipal 2. Military 3. Unki
❑ VisuaVOdor
❑ Water In Tank
❑ Water Supply Well Contamination
SOURCE OF
Cause of Release
(Check one to Indicate primary
cause)
❑ Spill
❑ Overfill
❑ Corrosion
❑ Physical or Mechanical
Damage
❑ Install Problem
❑ Other
® Unknown
Detlnttlons presented on reverse
sown 4. Private 5. Federal 6. Cos
AMINA
Type of Release
(Check one)
® Petroleum
❑ Non -Petroleum
❑ Both
Location
(Check one)
® Facility
❑ Residence
❑ Other
inty 7. State
LOGroundwater Contamination
urface Water Contamination
ther (spedfy)
Product Type
Released
(Check one to Indicate primary product We
released)
❑
Gasoline/ Dieseil
❑ DleseWeg. Oil
Kerosene
Blend
®
Heating Oil
❑ Vegetable 011 100%
❑
Other Petroleum
❑ E10 — E20
Products
❑ E21— E84
❑
Metals
❑
Other Inorganics
❑ E85 — E99
❑
Other Organics
❑ Ethanol 100%
❑ E01— E09
ration Tyne
ublic Service 2. Agricultural 3. Residential 4. Education/Relig. 5. Industrial 02ommeEal 7. Mining
Page 1 of 2
Form 61(02/08)