25046_Harrelson Ford EMP_20231020

Hanley Environmental, PLLC
323 Manning Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina 28209
NC Engineering License P-2407
T: [phone]
www.hanleyenvironmental.com
ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT PLAN

Harrelson Ford Brownfields Property

6500 South Boulevard
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 25046-21-060
Project Number: PJ23030

Revision 1
October 20, 2023

Prepared for:
Tri Pointe Homes Holdings, Inc.

1
MP Version 3, March 2023
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Redevelopment Section at the direction of a Brownfields
project manager.

The EMP is a standard requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an effort
to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory-compliant
decision-making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.

Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development-related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the EMP to be valid for use, it must be
completed, reviewed by the Section, signed by all parties working on the project, and
approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of the
EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a recorded agreement, be cause for
a reopener.

The EMP is valid only for the scope of work described herein and must be updated to be
applicable for new phases of redevelopment or after significant changes in applicable
regulatory guidance. Risk characterization of a Brownfields Property to DEQ’s written
satisfaction is required prior to EMP approval.

Voluntary Metrics Tab
The NC Brownfields Redevelopment Section updates estimated capital investment (from the
Brownfields Property Application) and estimated jobs created (from the Brownfields
Agreement) whenever possible. As a voluntary measure, you may opt to complete the below
information for capital investment and jobs created as estimated by your final redevelopment
plans for the Brownfields Property:

1. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: $40,000,000
2. Estimated jobs created:
a. Construction Jobs: Click or tap here to enter text.
b. Full Time Post-Redevelopment Jobs: Click or tap here to enter text.

2
MP Version 3, March 2023
Table of Contents
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION .................................................................. 1
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................................................................... 1
GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................ 4
COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 4
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION ..................................................... 5
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS ........................................................................................................................ 6
CONTAMINATED MEDIA ......................................................................................................................... 7
PART 1. SOIL ........................................................................................................................................ 8
PART 2. GROUNDWATER .................................................................................................................. 19
PART 3. SURFACE WATER .................................................................................................................. 22
PART 4. SEDIMENT ............................................................................................................................ 22
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR ......................................................................................................................... 23
PART 6. INDOOR AIR ......................................................................................................................... 25
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM ............................................................................................. 25
CONTINGENCY PLAN ............................................................................................................................. 26
POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING..................................................................................................... 28
APPROVAL SIGNATURES ....................................................................................................................... 29
Figures
Figure 1 Subject Property Location Map
Figure 2 Subject Property Map
Figure 3 Historical Sampling Locations Overlaying Redevelopment Plans
Figure 4 Excavation Extents and Proposed Excavation Areas
Figure 5 NCBP Diagram for Temporary Containment of Impacted or Potentially Impacted
Soil

Appendices
Appendix A Preliminary Site Development Plans
Appendix B Preliminary Grading Plan and Cut/Fill Analysis
Appendix C Construction Schedule
Appendix D Historical Data Summary
Appendix E Previously Approved EMP dated November 4, 2022

3
MP Version 3, March 2023
So that the EMP provides value in protecting Brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing all of the following is premature and may
be returned without comment.

☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields project manager.

☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields project manager.

Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:

☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not, conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.

☒ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.

☒ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.

☐ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
onsite after construction grading.

☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).

☒ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.

☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☐ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.

☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
Brownfields approval.

☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for import to the Brownfields Property.

4
MP Version 3, March 2023

☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Guidelines.

☐ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.

☒ If a Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) is required by the Brownfields
Redevelopment Section, the VIMS plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.

GENERAL INFORMATION

Date: 10/2/2023 Revision Date (if applicable): Previously approved EMP
dated November 4, 2023, covered excavation activities and
removal of impacted soil at the site.

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Harrelson Ford

Brownfields Project Number: 25046-21-060

Brownfields Property Address: 6500 South Boulevard, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County

Brownfields Property Area (acres): The Brownfields property area is approximately 10.58 acres. The
location of the site is presented on Figure 1 and a map depicting site features is included as Figure 2.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.

COMMUNICATIONS

A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities in an area that is
prominently accessible to site workers. NOTE, THE EMP DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE-SPECIFIC
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.

Prospective Developer (PD): Tri Pointe Homes
Contact Person: Margaret Puckett
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-944-4420 Mobile: [phone]

5
MP Version 3, March 2023
Email: [e-mail]

Contractor for PD: To Be Determined
Contact Person: Click or tap here to enter text.
Phone Numbers: Office: Click or tap here to enter text. Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: Click or tap here to enter text.

Environmental Consultant: Hanley Environmental, PLLC
Contact Person: David Hanley, PE
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-317-6086 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Brownfields Redevelopment Section Project Manager: Bill Schmithorst, PG
Phone Numbers: Office: 919-441-3606 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: [e-mail]

Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
Brownfields Property Management Unit
[e-mail]

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields project manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:

On-site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior ☒

Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior ☒

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours ☒

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours ☒

Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior ☒

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days ☒

6
MP Version 3, March 2023
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☐Residential ☒Townhomes (Prior written DEQ approval REQUIRED regardless of ownership
structure) ☐Recreational ☐Institutional ☐Commercial ☐Office ☐Retail ☐Industrial
☐Other specify:
The proposed redevelopment plans for the Brownfields property include razing the existing site
buildings and all other on-site features for construction of 26 three-story townhome buildings
totaling 165 for-sale, individually owned units. Preliminary site development plans are included
in Appendix A. Planned site features in addition to the townhome buildings include driveways,
parking areas, sidewalks, and dumpster/recycling enclosure. Brownfields approval for townhome
development has been obtained for a portion of the site, and additional approval for townhome
development on the remainder of the site will be sought following completion of additional
excavation activities to be performed after the existing buildings are removed.

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth-moving activities
at the site:
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
☐ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
☐ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors

3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
A copy of the most recent redevelopment plans is included in Appendix A and a copy of the
grading plan and cut and fill analysis are provided in Appendix B. As noted above,
redevelopment plans include razing the existing site buildings and all other on-site features,
removing concrete foundations, and leveling the site for development of 26 three-story
townhome buildings totaling 165 for-sale, individually owned units. In addition to townhomes,
redevelopment plans include construction of new access roads, parking areas, sidewalks,
dumpster/recycling enclosure and limited landscaped areas.

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.

5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?

7
MP Version 3, March 2023
S&EC requirements can be found at: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-and-land-
resources/erosion-and-sediment-control/erosion-and-sediment-control-laws-and-rules
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that earth-work will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.

6) Which category of risk-based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
☒ Residential ☐ Non-Residential or Industrial/Commercial

7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule): Appendix C
a) Construction start date: 10/2/2023

b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
Asbestos abatement (if needed) and demolition will begin in October 2023 and are expected
to conclude in March 2024. Excavation of impacted soil as described in Part 1.A below will be
conducted following abatement and demolition activities. Grading activities are scheduled to
begin in June 2024 along with sewer and stormwater utility installation which is expected to
conclude in October 2024. Townhome occupancy is expected to begin in January 2025, with
final occupancy of all townhomes in July 2025.

c) Additional phases planned? ☐ Yes ☒ No

If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 1/1/2025

CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Please fill out the sections below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas
of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure overlaying new

8
MP Version 3, March 2023
construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown
Part 2. Groundwater: .................................... ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown
Part 3. Surface Water: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown ☐ N/A
Part 4. Sediment: .......................................... ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown ☐ N/A
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ......................................... ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown
Part 6. Sub-Slab Soil Vapor: .......................... ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown
Part 7. Indoor Air: ......................................... ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☒ Unknown

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.

Tabulated data and sample location figures are provided as Appendix D. A historical sample
location map overlying redevelopment plans is provided as Figure 3.

PART 1. SOIL
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
Soil assessment activities were conducted by others at the Brownfields property in August 2021,
February 2022, and May 2022. Following assessment activities, a soil excavation was completed
from January 2023 through March 2023 to remove soil containing tetrachloroethene (PCE) and
trichloroethene (TCE) beneath Buildings 3 and 4 slabs as shown on Figure 4. Post-excavation soil
samples were collected following excavation activities. A tabular summary of the soil sample
laboratory analytical results for samples collected pre- and post-excavation at the Brownfields
property are included in Appendix D, and soil sample locations are provided on figures included
in Appendix D. A summary of the soil assessment results post-excavation are provided below.

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
VOCs were not detected above Residential or Non-Residential Preliminary Soil Remediation
Goals (PSRGs). VOCs detected above the Protection of Groundwater PSRGs following excavation
activities include chloromethane, methylene chloride, PCE, TCE, and cis-1,2-dichloroethene.

Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
One SVOC, 1-methylnapthalene, was detected above the NCDEQ Protection of Groundwater
PSRG in one soil sample collected beneath Building 3 prior to excavation activities. The
concentration of 1-methylnapthalene was below the Residential and Non-Residential PSRG. Soil
from this location was removed and disposed off-site during excavation activities. Other SVOCs
were detected above laboratory method detection limits, but below NCDEQ PSRGs. Confirmation
soil samples were not analyzed for SVOCs following removal of impacted soil beneath Building 3.

Metals

9
MP Version 3, March 2023
The concentrations of metals detected at the Brownfields property were generally within site-
specific background concentrations. One soil sample collected beneath Building 3 prior to
excavation activities indicated the presence of selenium above the NCDEQ Protection of
Groundwater PSRG and above the Site-specific background range.

Hexavalent chromium was detected above the NCDEQ Residential PSRG in soil samples collected
prior to excavation activities from locations near former in-ground lifts, trench drains associated
with an oil/water separator system, former wash bay floor drain, and near the former
automotive repair operations on the northern side of Building 3. Hexavalent chromium impacted
soil near the former in-ground lifts and trench drains was removed during excavation activities.
However, confirmation soil samples were not analyzed for metals following excavation activities.

Remaining metals concentrations detected were within background ranges and/or below NCDEQ
PSRGs.

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons – Diesel Range Organics (TPH-DRO)
TPH-DRO was previously detected at concentrations above the NCDEQ underground storage tank
(UST) Section Action Level in soil samples collected beneath Building 3 prior to excavation
activities. Confirmation soil samples were not analyzed for TPH-DRO following removal of
impacted soil beneath Building 3.

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
PCBs were not detected during soil assessment activities at concentrations above the NCDEQ
PSRGs.

2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Compounds detected at concentrations above the NCDEQ PSRGs in soil samples collected at the
site range from ground surface to ten feet below ground surface.

3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
The entire site (approximately 10.6 acres) is expected to be disturbed during redevelopment. Soil
will be disturbed for grading activities and excavation of known impacted soil to prepare the site
for development of townhomes. Soil excavation activities have occurred and additional
excavation will be conducted following building demolition and slab removal pursuant to a
previously approved EMP dated November 4, 2022, which covers soil excavation activities but
did not include site redevelopment. A copy of the preliminary grading plan is provided as
Appendix B. A copy of the previously approved EMP is provided as Appendix E.

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
Soil excavation will be conducted in the areas labeled as “Areas with Detectable Levels of PCE
and/or TCE Above the Remedial Goals” on Figure 4. Contaminated soil excavation activities will
be conducted pursuant to a previously approved EMP dated November 4, 2022. It is anticipated

10
MP Version 3, March 2023
that the maximum excavation depth will be 9 feet below ground surface based on previous
assessment activities and depth to groundwater. An excavation work plan has been submitted to
NCDEQ under a separate cover to describe planned excavation activities.

During site grading activities, excavation/cut will be performed to depths up to approximately 12
feet, as shown on the preliminary cut/fill report.

5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
It is estimated that 100 to 150 cubic yards of impacted soil will be excavated and disposed of off-
site in connection with the excavation work described above. Excavation activities will be
conducted pursuant to a previously approved EMP dated November 4, 2022.

During grading activities, soil import is expected, with an import volume of approximately 14,500
cubic yards based on preliminary estimates.

6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
It is estimated that 100 to 150 cubic yards of impacted soil will be excavated and disposed of off-
site during redevelopment activities in connection with the excavation work described above.
No other soil export is anticipated.

7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
It is estimated that 100 to 150 cubic yards of impacted soil will be excavated and disposed of off-
site during redevelopment activities.

PART 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ☐Yes ☒No
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained-Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained-In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes ☐ No

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED-OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA

11
MP Version 3, March 2023
CONTAINED-IN POLICY, THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ONSITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes ☒ No
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
☐ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ If no, explain rationale:
Soil analytical results from previous site investigation and post-excavation
sampling activities did not identify soil impacts at characteristically hazardous
concentrations or concentrations exceeding the TCLP criteria using the Rule of
20.

d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ONSITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH
DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
☒ Preliminary Health-Based Residential SRGs
☐ Preliminary Health-Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
☒ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
☒ Site-specific risk-based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Per the Brownfields Agreement, excavation of the areas of soil impacted with chlorinated
solvent compounds (i.e., PCE and TCE) at concentrations above the NCDEQ Protection of
Groundwater PSRGs as identified in the Soil Excavation Completion Report by Hart &
Hickman, P.C., dated March 30, 2023 will be conducted per the previously approved EMP
dated November 4, 2022. Confirmation soil sampling following excavation activities will be
performed in accordance with an excavation work plan previously submitted to NCDEQ for
approval.

12
MP Version 3, March 2023

Impacted soil in areas outside of the areas labeled as “Areas with Detectable Levels of PCE
and/or TCE Above the Remedial Goals” in the Soil Excavation Completion Report (if any) will
be screened using Residential PSRGs and/or the Division of Waste Management Risk
Calculator.

Additional comments:
For compounds other than chlorinated solvents, Residential PSRGs will be used for initial
screening, and then the risk calculator may be used as a second step of screening if PSRGs are
exceeded.

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields project manager.
☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil onsite map to
Brownfields project manager once known.
☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☒
☒ Describe cap or fill:
Should known impacted soil or potentially impacted soil be encountered during
redevelopment outside of the areas labeled as “Areas with Detectable Levels of PCE
and/or TCE Above the Remedial Goals” in the Soil Excavation Completion Report, soil
may be placed beneath impervious surfaces (asphalt or concrete driveways, sidewalks,
dumpster enclosure, etc.) or a minimum of 2 ft of demonstrably clean fill. Known or
potentially impacted soil will not be placed beneath townhome lots.

☒ Confer with NC BF project manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-recorded if
actions are Post-Recordation).
☒ GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
☐ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:

4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
☒ Check to confirm that management of fugitive dust from site activities will be handled in
accordance with applicable local, state, and federal requirements.

Click or tap here to enter text.

13
MP Version 3, March 2023
Field screening of site soil
At a minimum, contractors shall be made aware of protocols should impacted soils (e.g. staining,
unusual odors, fill materials) be identified.

Describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting field
screening:
During grading and other soil disturbance activities at the Brownfields property,
contractors will observe soil for evidence of potential impacts including unnatural color,
strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concern (i.e., chemicals, tanks,
drums, etc.). If evidence of potential impacts is observed, the contactor will notify the
environmental professional to observe the suspect soil. The environmental professional
will be responsible for assessing whether soil may be impacted. NCDEQ Brownfields
project manager will be notified within 48 hours if suspect soil is confirmed by the
environmental professional.

Excavation of chlorinated solvent impacted soil in the areas labeled as “Areas with
Detectable Levels of PCE and/or TCE Above the Remedial Goals” in the Soil Excavation
Completion Report will be performed in accordance with procedures in the previously
approved EMP dated November 4, 2022.

Soil sample collection
☐ Yes

☒ Not anticipated - In order to avoid delays in construction, a plan shall be in place for sampling
of suspect soils should they be encountered during redevelopment. If soil sample collection is
not anticipated but the need to do so is identified during redevelopment, notify the Brownfields
project manager of the anticipated sample and report dates for scheduling purposes.

Describe the sampling method (e.g., in-situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.) and confirm that all
procedures outlined in applicable DEQ guidance for assessment shall be followed Typically, at
least one representative sample (per 500 yd3 for residential and 1,000 yd3 for commercial)
consisting of a 3 to 5-point composite sample with grab sample for VOCs based on the highest PID
reading is required to determine soil management options:
If potentially impacted soil is encountered during grading or installation of building
footers or utilities, the potentially impacted soil may be stockpiled on top of and covered
with minimum 10-mil plastic sheeting as shown on Figure 5 to not delay construction
activities. The excavation of potentially impacted soil will only progress as needed to
complete redevelopment activities. If potentially impacted soil is encountered beneath
planned townhome lots, NCDEQ Brownfields will be notified within two business days to
determine if additional sampling will be required. For potentially impacted, stockpiled soil
and for any soil proposed for export, at least one representative composite sample (made
up of at least 3 aliquot soil samples) will be collected per every 500 cubic yards of soil for
analyses listed below. Each collected aliquot will be split into two containers. One aliquot

14
MP Version 3, March 2023
container will be used for field screening and the other aliquot container will remain
undisturbed. A VOC sample will be collected directly from the undisturbed aliquot sample
that exhibits the highest potential for impact based on field screening (odor, staining, PID
response). Aliquots will be collected from representative locations of the stockpiled soil
and for any soil proposed for export. Aliquots will be field screening with a PID prior to
compositing. Based on the soil analytical results, a TCLP sample may be analyzed to
assess if soil exceeds the toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria. The soil will be
handled as outlined in the tables below as provided by NCDEQ.

Check applicable chemical analytes for soil samples:
☒ Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method
8260; Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA
List + Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Check to confirm that by the owner’s signature and the North Carolina Professional
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect
soil sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the
sealing professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines and
methodologies are followed and reported to DEQ for determination and approval of soil
placement prior to final relocation.
Note: An approved excavation work plan will dictate sampling and analyses to be used for excavation of
the currently known areas of soil impacted with chlorinated solvent compounds beneath Building 3 and
Building 4. No work plans for suspect soil sample collection other than those areas will be submitted
beyond this EMP.

If impacted soils above applicable PSRGs and/or site specific risk thresholds are proposed to be
relocated on-site, prior to final placement on-site, the following shall be submitted for DEQ
review/approval
- Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the above referenced frequency and
following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum Requirements Checklist (Checklist) and in
accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of Contaminated Sites
(Guidelines)
- Figure outlining planned soil placement and any future site features including
buildings/hardscape/open areas
- A North Carolina PE/PG recommendation of placement

15
MP Version 3, March 2023
Impacts
Options
Onsite Placement without
conditions
Onsite placement under 2 ft
of cap or clean fill1, 2
All Constituents below applicable
PSRGs X
Constituents3 below applicable
PSRGs; Metals below background
but above PSRGs
X
Constituents3 below applicable
PSRGs; Metals above Background
/PSRGs
X
Constituents above Applicable
PSRGs X
1: Requires Prior Written DEQ Approval
2: VOC impacted soils above applicable PSRGs shall not be placed directly beneath building footprints
without prior written DEQ approval.
3: Constituents indicate any samples evaluated for other than metals.

☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted in
accordance with Figure 5 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion control,
prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing
contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as needed:

☒ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes below
(Check all that apply):
☒ Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method
8260; Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA
List + Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides):
Click or tap here to enter text.

Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, indicate if a work
plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
Following completion of redevelopment activities (i.e., grading and utility construction) but
prior to building occupancy, a final grade sampling plan will be prepared and submitted to
Refer to Figure 5.

16
MP Version 3, March 2023
NCDEQ for approval. The final grade sampling scope will be based on an evaluation of
areas of exposed, disturbed soil at the site or areas not capped with 2 ft of demonstratively
clean fill. The work plan will include a diagram of soil sampling locations, number of
samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.

☐ If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.

PART 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL

NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM
THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION. According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written approval
in advance by the Brownfields Redevelopment Section), will safeguard the liability protections
provided by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective
developer/property owner.”

Requirements for importing fill:
☒ Check to confirm that the import volumes outlined below have been confirmed based on
geotechnical evaluations.

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
Import volume of approximately 14,500 cubic yards is anticipated based on preliminary estimates.

3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range
of depths, list the range.)
Based on the grading plan and cut/fill analysis provided in Appendix B depths of fill will range up
to approximately 9 feet.

PRIOR TO SOIL PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, a Soil Import Request must be
submitted for DEQ Brownfields review and approval. The request shall consist of a data
package that details:

- Fill source location/history (Phase I if available, current aerials, etc.)
- Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the below frequency and
following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum Requirements Checklist (Checklist)
and in accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of
Contaminated Sites (Guidelines)
- A table comparing the import soil to existing site concentrations
- A PE/PG recommendation of import
- All relevant attachments listed in the Checklist

17
MP Version 3, March 2023
Soil Import Sampling Requirements:
Source Sample Frequency Sample Analysis
Virgin Material from DEQ
Brownfields Pre-
approved Quarry
None (Contact Brownfields project manager for list of pre-
approved Quarries
DEQ Permitted Quarry
(Not Brownfields Pre-
approved)
At least one
representative sample
from area of planned
import
VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA
Metals, any site specific
COCs (e.g. pesticides,
PCBs, etc.)
Other NC DEQ
Brownfields Property
At least one
representative sample
per 1,000 yd3 consisting
of a 3-point composite
sample with grab sample
for VOCs based on the
highest PID reading
VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA
Metals, any site specific
COCs (e.g. pesticides,
PCBs, etc.)
Off-site
unpermitted/regulated
property
Bulk Landscape Material
from Commercial Vendor
(i.e. topsoil)
No Sampling Required

If other special considerations apply, discuss:
Organic-rich topsoil for use in landscaping and clean gravel (e.g. 57-stone) for use beneath
building pads will be imported. These materials will be obtained from commercial material
vendors and will not be sampled prior to import.

☒ Check to confirm that by the owner’s signature and the North Carolina Professional
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect soil
sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the sealing
professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines are followed and reported in
the Soil Import Request for DEQ approval. Failure to meet these requirements could result in
resampling and/or failure to approve import.

PART 1.C. SOIL EXPORT

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION. Failure to obtain approval may violate a brownfields
agreement causing a reopener or jeopardizing eligibility in the Section, endangering liability
protections and making said action possibly subject to enforcement. Justifications provided
below must be approved by the Section in writing prior to completing transport activities. Refer
to Brownfields IR 15 for additional details.

1) If export from the Brownfields Property is anticipated, export soil must be sampled at a
frequency of one sample per 1,000 yd3 consisting of a 3-point composite sample with a
grab sample for VOCs based on the highest PID reading. Samples shall be analyzed at a
minimum for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals plus any site specific COCs.

18
MP Version 3, March 2023
PRIOR TO EXPORT FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, a Soil Export Request must be
submitted for DEQ Brownfields review and approval. The request shall consist of a Data
Package that details:

- Proposed Receiving Facility
- Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the above referenced
frequency and following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields
Redevelopment Section Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum
Requirements Checklist (Checklist) and in accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for
Assessment and Cleanup of Contaminated Sites (Guidelines)
- A table comparing the export soil to concentrations on the receiving site concentrations
including risk comparison (Note that calculated risk cannot be increased on the receiving
site)
- A North Carolina PE/PG recommendation of export
- Written approval from the receiving site property owner representative for export
- All relevant attachments listed in the Checklist

Soil Export Options
Impacts
Options
Use as
Beneficial Fill
Off-site disposal at
other Brownfields
Property2,6,7
Off-site disposal
at LCID/CD
Landfill1, 3
Off-site disposal at Subtitle
D MSW/Permitted
Landfarm4
All Constituents below
applicable PSRGs X X X X
Constituents5 below
applicable PSRGs; Metals
below background but
above PSRGs
X X X
Constituents5 below
applicable PSRGs; Metals
above Background /PSRGs
X X X
Constituents above
Applicable PSRGs X X
1: Requires Prior Written DEQ Approval
2: VOC impacted soils above applicable PSRGs shall not be placed directly beneath building footprints
without prior written DEQ approval.
3: Requires comparison to site specific metals concentrations.
4: Facility to determine if they can accept soil within their permit.
5: Constituents indicate any samples evaluated for other than metals.
6: Requires written approval from receiving site property owner representative.
7. Site COCs must be in comparable concentrations to receiving site and not significantly raise risk of
the receiving site.

☒ Check to confirm that by the owner’s signature and the North Carolina Professional
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect soil
sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the sealing
professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines are followed and reported in
the Soil Export Request for DEQ approval. Failure to meet these requirements could result in

19
MP Version 3, March 2023
resampling and/or failure to approve export.

If other special considerations apply, discuss:
Soil export to a lined, Subtitle D municipal solid waste landfill (e.g., Republic Charlotte Motor
Speedway Landfill) may be performed without advanced approval from DEQ. In this case, soil
sampling and characterization requirements will be determined by the landfill in accordance with
the landfill’s permit. Soil export to a lined, Subtitle D municipal solid waste landfill will be
documented in the Redevelopment Summary Reports.

PART 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES

☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)

☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were
removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth
from which it was excavated.

☒ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants.
☒ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials or provide the results of this evaluation in the
Vapor Mitigation Plan. Note that if vapor mitigation is planned for site buildings, utility corridors
will need to be evaluated as part of mitigation designs:
This evaluation will be conducted as part of the VIMS design, and justification for using or
omitting barriers along utilities (e.g., trench dams) will be provided along with specifications for
barriers (if warranted).

☐ If no, include rationale here:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Unknown, details to be provided in the Vapor Mitigation Plan for site buildings

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Click or tap here to enter text.
PART 2. GROUNDWATER

1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
Historical groundwater assessment activities indicated the depth to groundwater was measured
ranging from approximately 9.5 feet below ground surface in the eastern portion of the
Brownfields property to approximately 17 feet below ground surface located in the southern
portion of the Brownfields property.

20
MP Version 3, March 2023
2) What is the maximum depth of soil disturbance onsite?
Based on review of the preliminary grading plan and cut/fill analysis, and in consideration of
excavation activities to be conducted during redevelopment, the maximum depth of soil
disturbance will be approximately 12 feet below ground surface. Groundwater is not expected
to be encountered during grading activities. A copy of the grading plan and cut/fill analysis is
included in Appendix B, and soil excavation activities is discussed in Part 1.

3) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☐onsite ☐offsite ☒both or ☐unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
Historical groundwater assessment activities included collection of six groundwater samples by
others for laboratory analysis in August 2021 and June 2022. Historical groundwater data is
summarized in a table and a figure depicting sample locations provided on Figure 3 and in
Appendix D. A summary of the previously completed groundwater assessment results is
provided below:

Volatile Organic Compounds
Groundwater sample analytical results indicated the presence of PCE at a concentration above
the 15A NCAC 02L .0202 Groundwater Standard (2L Standard) in one groundwater sample
(TMW-6) and associated duplicate sample. PCE concentrations were below the NCDEQ
Residential and Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSLs). TMW-6
was located immediately north of Building 3. Acetone, benzene, 2-hexanone, and methyl tert-
butyl ether (MTBE) were also detected in one or more samples at concentrations below 2L
Standards and Residential and Non-Residential GWSLs.

Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
No SVOCs were detected at concentrations above laboratory method detection limits in
groundwater samples collected.

Metals
Groundwater sample analytical results indicated the presence of several metals including
arsenic, barium, chromium (total), lead, and selenium at concentrations above laboratory
method detection limit in site groundwater but below 2L Standards and Residential and Non-
Residential GWSLs, if applicable.

4) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
A potentiometric groundwater map generated from groundwater assessment activities in August
2021 indicates shallow groundwater at the Brownfields property mimics surface topography and
generally flows toward the east (Appendix D).

5) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities (e.g.
footer/utility construction or helical pilings?)
☐Yes ☒No
If yes, describe these activities:
Shallow groundwater is not expected to be encountered during site work. Management of
groundwater encountered during contaminated soil excavation activities described in Part 1 will
be conducted pursuant to a previously approved EMP dated November 4, 2022.

21
MP Version 3, March 2023

In the event that groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if no is
checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering
of groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to
sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or sampling procedures).
If groundwater is encountered, an environmental professional will be contacted to observe
groundwater for potential impacts (based on strong odor, unnatural color, sheen, etc.). If the
environmental professional considers that the groundwater is likely impacted, appropriate
worker safety measures will be taken to manage groundwater. Accumulated groundwater will
be allowed to evaporate or infiltrate soil if such activities do not impede construction progress.
If time required for groundwater infiltration is infeasible, groundwater shall be pumped to a
holding tank and sampled. One representative groundwater sample will be collected for analysis
of VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, and RCRA metals by EPA Method
6020/7199. The groundwater sample will be collected directly from the holding tank using a
decontaminated scoop or directly into laboratory supplied containers.

If groundwater is sampled and constituent concentrations are below the 15A NCAC subchapter
02B Standards (2B Standards) based on analytical results, the accumulated groundwater may be
used on the Brownfields property for dust control purposes or transferred to a frac or holding
tank. If off-site disposal of groundwater is deemed necessary, groundwater will be tested by an
environmental professional. Impacted groundwater will be disposed of off-site at a permitted
facility and non-impacted groundwater (as determined by analytical results in comparison to
NCDEQ 2B Standards) may be discharged to the storm sewer in accordance with applicable
municipal and state regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control.

6) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☐Yes ☒No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes ☐No

7) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
☐ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Redevelopment Section’s intent to allow proper abandonment of
well(s) as specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active
monitoring through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
☐ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
☐ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
☒ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.

8) Please provide additional details as needed:

Click or tap here to enter text.

22
MP Version 3, March 2023
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.

PART 3. SURFACE WATER
1) Is surface water present at the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No
2) If yes, attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities or as part of the final redevelopment? ☐ Yes ☐ No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
Surface water is not present at the Brownfields property.
Should surface water (in the form of stormwater runoff) collect in an excavated area determined
to be impacted during redevelopment activities, the accumulated surface water will be allowed
to evaporate or infiltrate soils if such activities do not impede construction progress. If time
required for surface water infiltration is infeasible, surface water shall be pumped to a holding
tank and sampled. One representative surface water sample will be collected for analysis of
VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, and RCRA metals by EPA Method
6020/7199. The surface water sample will be collected directly from the holding tank using a
decontaminated scoop or directly into laboratory supplied containers.
If surface water is sampled and constituent concentrations are below NCDEQ 2B Standards based
on analytical results, the accumulated surface water may be used on the Brownfields property
for dust control purposes or transferred to a frac or holding tank. If off-site disposal of surface
water is deemed necessary, surface water will be tested by an environmental professional.
Impacted surface water will be disposed of off-site at a permitted facility and non-impacted
surface water (as determined by analytical results in comparison to NCDEQ standards) may be
discharged to the storm sewer in accordance with applicable municipal and state regulations for
erosion control and construction stormwater control.

PART 4. SEDIMENT
1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No
4) Attach a map showing the location of known contaminated sediment at the property.

23
MP Version 3, March 2023
5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
Sediment is not present at the Brownfields property.

PART 5. SOIL VAPOR

1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:

Groundwater Exterior Soil Vapor Sub-Slab Soil Vapor
Residential ☐ Yes ☒ No
☐ Unknown
☒ Yes ☐ No
☐ Unknown
☒ Yes ☐ No
☐ Unknown
Commercial ☐ Yes ☒ No
☐ Unknown
☒ Yes ☐ No
☐ Unknown
☒ Yes ☐ No
☐ Unknown

2) Attach a map showing the locations of all soil vapor samples including any soil vapor
contaminants that exceeds screening levels and overlays planned site development features.

A map showing the locations of soil vapor samples is provided as Figure 3.

3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is exterior soil vapor known to be contaminated?
Sixteen exterior soil gas samples (SG-1 through SG-15) were collected in August 2021 and one exterior
soil gas sample (SG-16) was collected in February 2022. Exterior soil gas samples were collected at
depths ranging from 5.5 to 7 feet below ground surface. A summary of the results and compounds
detected above Residential SGSLs are presented below.

 PCE, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, m&p-xylene, o-xylene, n-heptane, and
n-hexane exceeded Residential SGSLs in a sample collected adjacent to Building 3 (SG-7).
 Chloroform was detected above the Residential SGSL in samples SG-4, SG-5, SG-9, SG-10, and
SG-11.
 Bromodichloromethane was detected in three samples (SG-2, SG-10, and SG-15) at
concentrations exceeding Residential SGSLs.
 Benzene was detected in soil gas samples SG-3, SG-8, SG-11, SG-12, and SG-14 above the
Residential SGSL.
 Naphthalene was detected in three samples (SG-12, SG-14, and SG-15) at a concentration
above the Residential SGSL.
 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane was detected in one sample (SG-13) at a concentration above the
Residential SGSL.
 Methyl tert-butyl ether was detected in one sample (SG-8) at a concentration above the
Residential SGSL.
 Naphthalene and benzene were detected above Residential SGSLs in soil gas sample SG-16.

Following completion of the excavation activities described in Part 1.A, confirmation soil vapor

24
MP Version 3, March 2023

4) If applicable, at what depth(s) is sub-slab soil vapor known to be contaminated?
☒0-6 inches ☐Other, please describe:
Six sub-slab soil vapor samples were collected in February 2022 beneath Buildings 2, 3 and 4, and
four additional sub-slab soil vapor samples were collected in May 2022 beneath Buildings 3 and 4.
Sub-slab soil gas samples were collected from directly beneath the slab using Vapor Pin® sampling
points. A summary of the results and compounds detected above Residential SGSLs are presented
below.

Building 2
PCE, chloroform, and naphthalene were detected at concentrations exceeding their Residential
SGSLs.

Building 3
PCE was detected at a concentration exceeding the Residential SGSL.

Building 4
PCE, TCE, vinyl chloride, benzene, 1,3-butadiene, and ethylbenzene were detected at
concentrations exceeding their Residential SGSLs.

5) Will workers encounter contaminated exterior or sub-slab soil vapor during planned
redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
In the event that apparent contaminated soil vapor is encountered (based on elevated PID
readings, unusual odors, etc.) during redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or
other subsurface work,) list activities for management of such contact, INCLUDING notification to
DEQ within 48 hours of identification of the issue for determination of additional requirements:
It should be noted that previous soil vapor samples were collected prior to excavation activities
beneath Buildings 3 and 4, and concentrations may be reduced compared to concentrations
detected in the previous assessments. If contaminated soil vapors are encountered during
redevelopment activities based on photoionization detector (PID) screening or other indications
such as strong odors, the excavation area will be evacuated, and appropriate safety screening of
the vapors will be performed. Safety screening will include screening of the breathing zone with
a PID or similar instrument to identify the potential for compounds at concentrations above
permissible exposure limits (PELs). If flammable/explosive gases (e.g., methane) are suspected,
concentrations will be evaluated in comparison to appropriate explosive limits. If results indicate
further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will
be implemented. The contractor will be responsible for performing work in accordance with
applicable Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations.

sampling will be conducted pursuant to a work plan recently submitted to NCDEQ.

25
MP Version 3, March 2023
PART 6. INDOOR AIR

1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No
2) If applicable, attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site
screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk-based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown ☒ N/A

☐ If no, include rationale here:
Proposed redevelopment plans include razing of site buildings and all other on-site features.
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:

VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM
1) Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

☐ If no or unknown, include rationale here as well as plans for pre-occupancy sampling, as
necessary:
Click or tap here to enter text.

If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☒ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
Based on the proposed development of townhomes and in consideration of the Minimum
Requirements for Townhome Developments dated May 2020, a VIMS Plan will be submitted
under separate cover for review and approval prior to construction. The VIMS will be developed
in general accordance with NCDEQ VIMS Design Submittal Requirements, New Construction
Minimum Requirements Checklist.

VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer and follow the DEQ
Brownfields Redevelopment Section’s Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System Design Submittal
Requirements.

Note that approval of this EMP does not imply approval with any vapor intrusion mitigation land
In the event there is evidence of potential indoor air issues such as unusual odors during
redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated, and appropriate safety screening of the indoor
air will be performed. Screening of indoor air will include periodically screening indoor air for volatile
organic vapors with a calibrated photoionization detector when workers are present in the building to
identify potential indoor air issues. Appropriate engineering controls (such as active ventilation) may
be implemented based on the screening results.

26
MP Version 3, March 2023
use restrictions or requirements of the recorded or draft Brownfields Agreement and that
separate approval of mitigation measures will be required.

CONTINGENCY PLAN

In this section, please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields project manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields project manager will be notified, and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site-specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
☒ Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260;
Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA List +
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Click or tap here to enter text.

Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.

Underground Storage Tanks – Note that UST Section guidelines must be followed for sample
frequency during UST closure. Unless damage to onsite structures to remain as part of
redevelopment would occur, USTs shall be removed from the Brownfields Property:
Three potential underground storage tanks (USTs) may be located near the northwest corner of
Building 3 based on observations of vent lines. A geophysical survey completed in August 2021 did
not identify anomalies consistent with USTs. USTs encountered during redevelopment will be
addressed through the NCDEQ Brownfields Redevelopment Section (rather than the UST Program).
NCDEQ Brownfields will be notified within 48 hours of discovery of previously-unknown USTs.

27
MP Version 3, March 2023
Upon UST discovery, the UST will be inspected for tank condition and the presence of fluid. Residual
fluids will be sampled for disposal characterization and transported off-site for disposal based on
the laboratory analytical results. The UST will then be removed and transported off-site for disposal
at a permitted facility. Following removal, confirmatory soil sampling will be conducted in
accordance with NCDEQ UST guidance. Impacted soil associated with the UST will be managed in
accordance with Part 1.A. Managing On-Site Soil of the EMP. If a UST is encountered that cannot be
excavated and removed or does not require removal for geotechnical or redevelopment purposes,
the UST may be abandoned in place using methods from the NCDEQ UST Section guidance, with
prior NCDEQ Brownfields approval.

Sub-Grade Feature/Pit:
If encountered, sub-grade features/pits that do not require removal for geotechnical or
construction purposes will be filled with soil or suitable fill and construction will proceed. If
appropriate, the base of the sub-grade feature/pit may be punctured to prevent the accumulation
of fluids. If the pit contains waste, the waste may be staged in a secure location until the waste
material can be properly characterized for disposal. If the pit must be removed, the sub-grade
feature/pit concrete will be visually inspected. If visual inspections indicate that concrete may be
potentially contaminated, the concrete will be sampled and analyzed by methods specified by the
permitted disposal facility. If impacted soils are discovered near the sub-grade feature/pit, the soils
will be managed in accordance with Part 1.A. Managing On-Site Soil of the EMP.
Buried Waste Material – Note that if buried waste, non-native fill, or any obviously filled materials
is encountered, the DEQ Brownfields Redevelopment Section must be notified to determine if
investigation of landfill gases is required:
If buried waste material or obviously filled materials are discovered during redevelopment activities,
the contractor will notify the environmental professional to review the material and collect samples
as necessary. If the material is excavated, confirmation samples will be collected from the base and
sidewalls of the excavation for analysis as detailed in Part 1.A. Landfill gas screening or analysis may
be required as determined by the NCDEQ Brownfields Redevelopment Section. NCDEQ will be
notified within 48 hours of identifying the site condition.

Re-Use of Impacted Soils Onsite:
Please refer to Part 1.A. Managing On-Site Soil of the EMP for a description of re-use of impacted
soils on-site.

If unknown, impacted soil is identified onsite, management onsite can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
project manager approval prior to final placement onsite.

If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
Click or tap here to enter text.

28
MP Version 3, March 2023
POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING

☒ Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the project manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 1/31/2025

The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment-related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).

☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement.

FIGURES

108/22/23PJ23030NAH0Figure No.DateProject No.Drawn ByRevision No.Title and ProjectNotes:
1. Topographic image obtai
ne
d fr
om U
nit
ed Stat
e
s G
eol
ogi
cal
Servi
c
e
s i(USGS)
onlin
e interf
a
ce ma
na
ge
d
b
y t
he USGSNatio
nal Ge
o
sp
atial Pro
gr
am (NGP)
on Au
gu
st 2
2, 2
02
3.HANLEY ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC323 MANNING DRIVECHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINANC LICENSE P-2407Subject Property Location MapHarrelson Ford Brownfields PropertyBrownfields Project Number 25046-21-0606500 South BoulevardCharlotte, North CarolinaLegendWESN1,0002,000 FTSubject Pr
o
pert
y B
o
un
dar
y
© 2023 Microsoft Corporation © 2023 Maxar ©CNES (2023) Distribution Airbus DS Building 1 - VacantWarehouseBuilding 2 -Multi-TenantAutomotive RepairBuilding 3 - VacantBuilding 4 - VacantOWSASTUSTASTASTFormer AirCompressor ShedASTASTASTUsed OilASTsUsed Oil ASTwith StainingNew OilASTs andDrums withStainingHydraulicPistons fromIn-Ground LiftsPetroleum-BasedSolvent DrumASTASTAutomotiveTransmissionFluid ASTsSoyLecithinToteFormer AirCompressor ShedThree PotentialUST Vent LinesUST Vent LineDDASTASTASTAir CompressorsUsed OilASTUsed OilASTMiscellaneous Oiland PetroleumDrums and TotesMiscellaneousDrums and TotesDAir CompressorSink HoleAutomotivePaintToteUsed OilASTsSOUTH BLVD
Norfolk-Southern
R
a
i
l
w
a
y
City of Charlotte

B
l
u
e
l
i
n
e

(
L
i
g
h
t

R
a
i
l
)Borrow Pit forExcavated SoilsBeneath Buildings3 and 4Paved Parking AreaOld Pineville Roa
d
208/22/2023PJ23030NAH0Subject Property MapHarrelson Ford Brownfields PropertyBrownfields Project Number 25046-21-0606500 South BoulevardCharlotte, North CarolinaFigure No.DateProject No.Drawn ByRevision No.Title and ProjectLegendNotes:1.Aerial image obtained f
rom AutoCAD Geolo
catio
n featu
re © 2023 Microsoft Cor
poration© 2023 Maxar © CNES (2
023) Di
stribution Airbus DS.2.Subject property boundary
pro
vi
ded i
n ALTA/NSPS
Land Title S
ur
vey pre
par
ed by A.G.Zoutewelle Survey
or
s dated Augu
st 31,
2021.HANLEY ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC323 MANNING DRIVECHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINANC LICENSE P-2407WESN30 ft60 ftOWSUSTASTDSubject Property BoundaryAboveground Storage TankOil Water SeparatorFormer Underground Storage TankCommercial DumpsterFloor DrainAboveground Hydraulic LiftPole-Mounted TransformerOut of Use In-Ground Hydraulic Lift
BLDG #21BLDG #20BLDG #19BLDG #18BLDG #17BLDG #15BLDG #14BLDG #11BLDG #10BLDG #7BLDG #12BLDG #9BLDG #8BLDG #25BLDG #26BLDG #6BLDG #5BLDG #4BLDG #3BLDG #2BLDG #1BLDG #22BLDG #23BLDG #24BLDG #16BLDG #13TMW-4/SB-1TMW-3/SB-8TMW-1TMW-6TMW-5TMW-2SG-6BG-1BG-2BG-3SB-2SB-9SB-3SB-5SB-4SB-6SB-7SG-11SG-12SSV-4SG-13SG-14SG-15SG-10SG-9SG-4SG-5SG-3SG-8SSV-5SSV-6SG-2SSV-2SSV-3SG-16SSV-1SG-1SG-7MP-3MP-18MP-43MP-30MP-3AMP-3BMP-3CMP-3DMP-18AMP-18BMP-18CMP-18DMP-30AMP-30BMP-30CMP-30DMP-43AMP-43BMP-43CMP-43DHL-3HL-4HL-6HL-2HL-8HL-14HL-13HL-5HL-7HL-12HL-9HL-10HL-23HL-20HL-18HL-17HL-16HL-15HL-19HL-11HL-22HL-21308/23/2023PJ23030NAH0Historical Sampling Locations OverlayingRedevelopment PlansHarrelson Ford Brownfields PropertyBrownfields Project Number 25046-21-0606500 South BoulevardCharlotte, North CarolinaFigure No.DateProject No.Drawn ByRevision No.Title and ProjectLegendNotes:1.Site redevelopment pla
n pr
ovided b
y LandDe
si
gn, In
c. date
d Ma
y 17, 202
3.2.Subject property boun
dar
y pro
vided in ALTA/NSPS Lan
d Titl
e Surv
ey p
repa
red
by A.G. Zoutewelle Su
r
veyo
r
s dated Augu
st 31,
2021.3.Sample locations estimate
d bas
ed on p
re
viou
s a
sse
ssment reports. Sample location
s for HL-1 and HL
-24 were not fou
nd on p
re
viou
sasses
sment
repo
rt
s.4.Excavation co
nfirmation
sample lo
cations
are pr
ovided on Figures 3 and 4 of the S
oil Ex
ca
vatio
n Completio
n Report prepared b
y Hart &Hickma
n, PC dat
ed Marc
h 30, 202
3.HANLEY ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC323 MANNING DRIVECHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINANC LICENSE P-2407WESN30 ft60 ftSubject Property BoundarySoil Sample LocationGroundwater Sample LocationCo-Located Soil and GroundwaterSample LocationSub-Slab Soil Gas Sample LocationExterior Soil Gas Sample LocationApproximate Excavation ExtentPreviously Completed
30 ft60 ft409/08/2023PJ23030NAH0Excavation Extents and Proposed Excavation AreasHarrelson Ford Brownfields PropertyBrownfields Project Number 25046-21-0606500 South BoulevardCharlotte, North CarolinaFigure No.DateProject No.Drawn ByRevision No.Title and ProjectLegendNotes:1.Aerial image obtained from AutoCAD Geoloc
ation feature © 2023 Microsoft Co
rpo
ration © 2023 Maxar ©CNES (2023) Dist
ri
butio
n Ai
rbu
s DS.
2.Subject property bou
ndar
y p
ro
vided in ALTA/NSPS Lan
d Title Su
rv
ey p
repa
red by A.G. Zoutewelle Su
r
veyo
r
s
dated A
ugust 31, 202
1.
3.Exca
vati
on extents
are approximated base
d on S
oil E
xca
vati
on Completed Rep
ort
dated M
ar
ch 30,
2023.4.PCE = tetrachloroethene; TCE = tri
chlo
roet
heneHANLEY ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC323 MANNING DRIVECHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINANC LICENSE P-2407WESNSubject Property BoundaryApproximate Excavation ExtentPreviously CompletedAreas with Detectable Levels of PCEand/or TCE Above Remedial GoalsBorrow Fill Taken to FillPreviously Completed ExcavationExcavation AExcavation DExcavation BExcavation CExcavation E

31
EMP Version 3, March 2023

5

APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS
OHE OHE
FO FO FO
FO FO >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>FO FO FO FO
FO
OHE
GASFO
UE
OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE6W6W6W OHE6W6W6W6WPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLGASGAS6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W
16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16WGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS
Tax # 173-041-73
Tax # 173-041-81Tax # 173-041-82
Tax # 173-041-85 Tax # 173-041-67 Tax # 173-041-84
Tax #
173-041-83(6625 South Blvd)
(6607 South Blvd)(6547 South Blvd)(6543 South Blvd)
(6535 South Blvd)
(6531 South Blvd)
(6501 South Blvd)
FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FOFOFO
2726 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 3512346758910112021192223242513141215161718
49
48
50
51
52
53
43
42
44
45
46
47
36
37
38
39
40
41
55
56
54
57
58
59
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
60
61
62
63
64
65
76
77
75
78
79
80
86
87
88
89
81
82
83
84
85
91
92
93
94
95
90
96
97
9899
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
108
109
110
107
111
112
113
121
120
122
123
124 114
115
116
117
118
119
158157
156
159
155154
153
152
164 165
163162161160
BLDG #1 BLDG #2 BLDG #3 BLDG #4 BLDG #5 BLDG #6BLDG # 7BLDG # 8BLDG # 9BLDG # 10BLDG # 11BLDG # 14BLDG # 15BLDG # 17BLDG # 18BLDG # 19BLDG # 20BLDG # 21BLDG # 16BLDG # 13BLDG # 12BLDG # 22
BLDG # 23
BLDG # 24
BLDG # 25
BLDG # 26
149
150
148
147
146
151
145
144
143
140
141
139
138
137
142
136
134
135
131
132
130
129128
133
127
126
125
CRUISETOWN DR (PRIVATE)RESIDENTIAL ALLEY (20' WIDE)R AF EE DR
(R ESIDENTI A L AL L EY (20 'WIDE))
KINGSPAN DR (PRIVATE)
RESIDENTIAL ALLEY (20' WIDE)SWALING ST (PRIVATE)RESIDENTIAL ALLEY (20' WIDE)BYBLOS LN (PRIVATE)RESIDENTIAL ALLEY (20' WIDE)BEIRUT DR (PRIVATE)
RESIDENTIAL ALLEY (20' WIDE)HARRELSON RD (PRIVATE)RESIDENTIAL ALLEY (20' WIDE)DRUMALEE CR (PRIVATE)
RESIDENTIAL ALLEY (20' WIDE)CASTLEREA DR (PRIVATE)RESIDENTIAL ALLEY (20' WIDE)BYBLOS LN (PRIVATE)100' PROTECTED STEM22.0'
BOC
20.0'
EOP
30'
R9.0' BOC
R10.0' EOP
18'
9'
21'112.0'64'5.5'5.5'112'112.0'
5.5'
5.5'
96'
21.0'
64.0'
5.5'
5.5'
16'
REDI-ROCK GRAVITY RETAINING
WALL & SAFETY RAIL (TO BE
DESIGNED BY OTHERS)
60'
30'
30'
33'
5.5'
5.5'
21'21'
21'
21'
5.5'
144.0'
5.5'
20.0'
5.5'
144.0'
5.5'
20.0'
5.5'
144.0'
5.5'
33.1'
5.5'
128.0'
5.5'5.5'
96.0'
5.5'
PROPOSED MAIL
KIOSK
20' BUILD-TO ZONE
24' SETBACK
FROM FUT BOC
PROP RIGHT-OF-WAY (NCDOT)
CLASS III MAJOR THOROUGHFARE
FUTURE BOC (STREETS MAP)
4+ AVENUE
24' SETBACK
FROM FUT B
O
C
AREA
RESERVED FOR
FUTURE
DUMPSTER AND
RECYCLING
ENCLOSURE.
SEE C3-12
30' EX R/W
20.0' R/W DEDICATION
SEE C8-28
8' PS
8' SW
112'
128'
144'
64'
80'
64'
96'96'
80'
96'
96'96'
96'
8.5'
OPEN SPACE (±0.49 AC.)
OPEN SPACE
(±0.09 AC.)
OPEN SPACE
(±0.12 AC.)
OPEN SPACE
(±0.09 AC.)
OPEN SPACE
(±0.08 AC.)
OPEN SPACE
(±0.16 AC.)30' SDE30' SDE20' SDE
20' SDE
DIRECTIONAL TYPE 1B CURB
RAMP PER NCDOT
STANDARDS. SEE C8-29
PROP. ON-STREET
GUEST PARKING
20' EOP
22' BOC
R10.0' EOPR9.0' BOC R9.0' BOCR10.0' EOP
38'SUE (2' BEHIND SW)
8' PS
8' SW
8' SW
12' OFFSET PS
8' PS
8' SW
CASTLEREA DR (PRIVATE)100' PROTECTED STEMEXISTING STORM DRAINAGE
SEE C5-00
20' EOP
30' EOP
6' SW
7' SW
20' EOP
8' PS
18.4' SDE
EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE
SEE C5-00
EXISTING
STORM
DRAINAGE
SEE C5-00
REDI-ROCK GRAVITY RETAINING
WALL & SAFETY RAIL (TO BE
DESIGNED BY OTHERS)
20' DW
20'
DW
20'
DW
25'
10' LIMITED

A
C
C
E
S
S

S
E
T
B
A
C
K
STAIRS &
HANDRAIL
(SEE C3-10)
RELOCATED DUKE ENERGY
POLE
RELOCATED DUKE ENERGY
POLE
RELOCATED DUKE ENERGY
POLE
RELOCATED DUKE ENERGY
POLERELOCATED DUKE ENERGY
POLE
PROP. GUEST PARKING
OPEN SPACE
(±0.05 AC.)
20'
DW
20'
DW
20'
DW
7' DW
7.0' DW
96'
80'
7' SW 7' SW 7' SW 7' SW 7' SW
6' SW
6' SW
7' SW
6' SW
6' SW
6' SW
6' SW
7' SW
6' SW 7' SW
6' SW
7' SW
6' SW
6' SW
8' SW
ACCESSIBLE SPACE
(SEE C3-12)
6' SW
6' SW
SIDEWALK
BRIDGING PER
CLDSM 40.11
6500 SOUTH BLVD
TAC HARRELSON FORD, LLC
6500 SOUTH BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NC
1020338
LAYOUT PLAN
N/A
JSI
JHF
JSI
C3-00
6/27/2023 3:50 PM JONATHAN FLEHAN P:\CLT\_2020\1020338\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\1020338_PLN_LYOT.DWG
KEY MAP
SEAL
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE
PROJECT
NORTH
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
VERT:
HORZ:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704.333.0325
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE # C-0658
ENG FIRM #: C-0658

LAND DEVELOPMENT -
2ND SUBMITTAL 05.17.2023
LAND DEVELOPMENT -
1ST SUBMITTAL 03.31.2023
SDRU-2022-00002
APPROVAL 02.09.2023
1" = 40'
8040020
SOLID WASTE
1.PER CITY ORDINANCE SEC 10.99 ROLLOUT CONTAINER COLLECTION
SERVICE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO SINGLE RESIDENTIAL UNITS,
PROVIDED SUCH SPECIAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE NOT PART OF A
MULTIFAMILY COMPLEX CONTAINING 30 OR MORE UNITS. THE
APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CONFIGURATIONS, LOT LINES, PHASE
LINES, OR VARIATIONS IN FORMS OR TIMING OF OWNERSHIP THAT
MAY BE APPROVED UNDER ANY PROVISIONS OF THE CITY
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND/OR THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE
AFTER INITIAL APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CONFIGURATIONS, LOT
LINES, PHASE LINES, OR VARIATIONS IN FORMS OR TIMING OF
OWNERSHIP, WILL NOT EXEMPT THE DEVELOPMENT OR ANY
PORTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT FROM THE APPLICABLE
PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION.
2.IF THE PROPERTY DECIDES TO HAVE THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE
PROVIDE GARBAGE/RECYCLE SERVICE ON THE CITY'S MULTIFAMILY
CONTRACT, THE PROPERTY WILL NEED A DUMPSTER OR
COMPACTOR AND DESIGNATED SPACE FOR RECYCLE CARTS ON
SITE. CONTACT SOLID WASTE ADMINISTRATION IF YOU HAVE ANY
QUESTIONS. 704-432-3537
UTILITIES:
1.ALL ON-SITE UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND
DEVELOPMENT DATA TABLE
REZONING PETITION NUMBER:#2021-074
SITE AREA: 10.58 ACRES
TAX PARCEL:173-042-04
ZONING:TOD-NC
WATERSHED:LOWER LITTLE SUGAR
PROPOSED USE:SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOMES
ATTACHED (FOR SALE)
PROPOSED UNITS:165 UNITS
MIN BUILDING HEIGHT:24'
MAX BUILDING HEIGHT:75'
PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT:48'
MIN. SETBACK FROM FUTURE BOC:24.0'
MIN LIMITED ACCESS SETBACK:10'
BUILD-TO ZONE FROM SETBACK:0-20'
MIN BUILD-TO PERCENTAGE:60%
MIN. SIDE YARD:0'
MIN. REAR YARD:0'
GARAGE SETBACK:BETWEEN 5-7 FT OR 20+ FT
FROM BACK OF ALLEY
MIN BUILDING SEPARATION:10.0'
MAX BUILDING LENGTH:400'
DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE:165/10.58 = 15.6 DUA
IMPERVIOUS AREA: 5.89 AC (256,615 SF)
OPEN SPACE REQUIRED:
TOTAL LOT AREA:10.58 AC
REQUIRED OPEN SPACE:10.58 AC * 0.10 = 1.06 AC
PROVIDED OPEN SPACE:47,180 SF = 1.08 AC
TREE SAVE AREA:
SITE IS PART OF THE TRANSIT STATION REGULATORY TREE AREA AND IS
THEREFORE EXEMPT FROM TREE SAVE REQUIREMENTS OF ORDINANCE
PARKING SUMMARY
PROVIDED ENCLOSED PARKING:1 SPACES/UNIT = 165
ALLOWABLE UNENCLOSED PARKING:1 SPACE/UNIT = 165
0.10 VISITOR/UNIT = 18
PROVIDED UNENCLOSED PARKING: ON-STREET: 8
DRIVEWAY:66
PULL-IN:74
ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED:PULL-IN: 5
TOTAL:ON-STREET:153
VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES REQUIRED:0
VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES PROVIDED:0
BICYCLE PARKING:
SHORT-TERM REQUIRED:NONE
SHORT-TERM PROVIDED:NONE
LONG-TERM REQUIRED:NONE
LONG-TERM PROVIDED:NONE
BUFFER REQUIREMENTS:NONE
COMPLETION TIMETABLE:
START:APRIL 2022
END:APRIL 2023
FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS [SEE C3-02]:
FLOOR AREA (16 FT UNIT):640 SF
NUMBER OF FLOORS:3
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE:VB
SOLID WASTE SUMMARY:
SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS
REQUIRED: (1) 8 CY COMPACTOR / 90
UNITS = (2) REQ
PROVIDED: AREA SUFFICIENT TO HOUSE
(2) 8 CY COMPACTORS
RECYCLING CONTAINERS
REQUIRED:144 SF / 80 UNITS = 288 SF
PROVIDED: AREA SUFFICIENT TO HOUSE
288 SF OF RECYCLING
CONTAINERS
CDOT NOTES (UPDATED 04.03.2023)
1.NON-STANDARD ITEMS (IE: PAVERS, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, ETC.) IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRE A RIGHT-OF-WAY ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE
CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION/NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BEFORE INSTALLATION. FOR CITY OF CHARLOTTE
MAINTAINED STREETS, CONTACT [e-mail].
2.DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES DURING ALL PHASES OF
CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE CDOT WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL HANDBOOK (WATCH), THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD), AND THE NCDOT ROADWAY STANDARD DRAWINGS.
3.ANY WORK WITHIN THE CITY'S ROW OR CITY MAINTAINED INFRASTRUCTURE MUST BE APPROVED BY CDOT AND WILL REQUIRE A ROW USE PERMIT OR ROW LEASE
DEPENDING UPON THE PROPOSED SCOPE AND DURATION OF CLOSURE. THESE APPROVALS ARE IN ADDITION TO SITE PLAN APPROVALS AND SHOULD BE
COORDINATED WITH CDOT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT [e-mail] AT LEAST 5 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO
BEGINNING WORK FOR IMPACTS LESS THAN 30 DAYS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT [e-mail] AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOR
IMPACTS GREATER THAN 30 DAYS. EVERY EFFORT SHALL BE MADE TO CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS WITH MINIMAL IMPACT TO ALL USERS OF THE PUBLIC ROW.
4.THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONTACT THE IMPLEMENTATION SECTION MANAGER, TONY TAGLIAFERRI, OF THE CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CDOT)
OR THEIR DESIGNEE AT 704-336-4119 TO IDENTIFY ANY CONFLICTS WITH TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION EQUIPMENT. 60- 90 DAYS WILL BE REQUIRED TO COORDINATE
RELOCATION. DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELATED RELOCATION COST AND/OR ANY REPAIR COST CAUSED BY THE CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER.
5.PEDESTRIAN-SCALE LIGHTING AND/OR STREET LIGHTING SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHOUT REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF CDOT.
DEVELOPER TO CONTACT CANDACE INGE (704-336-3932 OR [e-mail]) FOR LOCAL STREET LIGHTING CRITERIA WITH RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION PROJECTS AND TO CONTACT BRUCE HORLDT (704-589-5836 OR [e-mail]) FOR ALL OTHER PROJECTS LIGHTING
REQUIREMENTS. COORDINATE WITH DUKE ENERGY AND CDOT AS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE LIGHTING LEVELS, LIGHTING LAYOUT AND REQUIREMENTS FOR
INSTALLATION.
6.PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT UTILITY RELOCATION COORDINATION - FOR UTILITY COORDINATION RELATED TO BOTH EXISTING UTILITY RELOCATION NEEDS AND
PROPOSED NEW UTILITY INSTALLATIONS, PLEASE CONTACT [e-mail].
7.IT IS THE DEVELOPER, PROPERTY OWNER, OR A DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE’S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT DUKE ENERGY AND THE OTHER UTILITIES ON THE
ADJACENT POLE LINE(S) (E.G. – AT&T, SPECTRUM, ETC.) EARLY IN THE PLANNING AND DESIGN PHASE OF THE PROJECT TO DETERMINE IF INITIAL PLANS CAN SAFELY
ACCOMMODATE OVERHEAD UTILITIES WITHOUT CREATING ANY NESC/OSHA VIOLATIONS. IF THERE IS AN EXISTING NESC/OSHA OVERHEAD UTILITY CLEARANCE
REQUIREMENT THAT CONFLICTS WITH THE BUILD-TO ZONE REQUIREMENT, AND IN CONSULTATION WITH CDOT R/W SECTION STAFF AND DUKE ENERGY IT HAS BEEN
DETERMINED THAT BURYING UTILITY LINES ARE INFEASIBLE, THEN A NEW BUILD-TO LINE SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AT THE EDGE OF THE OVERHEAD UTILITY
CLEARANCE REQUIREMENT. CONTACT KARIF TAYLOR AT DUKE ENERGY ([e-mail]) FOR OVERHEAD UTILITY CLEARANCE REQUIREMENT
CONFLICTS.
8.A JOINT USE MANHOLE (MEET-ME MANHOLE) IS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER TO ACCOMMODATE ALL UTILITY TELECOM SERVICE PROVIDERS. THE JOINT USE
MANHOLE SHALL BE LOCATED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OUTSIDE OF THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
2023.06.28 09:14:44-04'00'
EROSION CONTROL
ENGINEERING
CDOT
URBAN FORESTRY
NOTE: SCHEDULE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGAT LEAST 48 HRS. PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY USING THE ONLINE FORM FOUND AT http://charlottenc.gov/ld
NOTE: THIS PLAN APPROVAL DOES NOT INCLUDE COMMERCIAL ZONING. ALL BUILDING PERMITS AND ZONING APPROVALS CAN BE OBTAINED AT MECKLENBURG COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT. PLEASE CALL CTAC AT
704-314-CODE(2633) FOR MORE INFORMATION.
PCSO / DETENTION / DRAINAGE PLAN
TREE ORDINANCE
PLANNING
UMUDD / MUDD / PED / TOD
NOTE: THIS PLAN APPROVAL DOES NOT INCLUDE CHARLOTTE WATER. FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CALL 704-336-5499 OR
VISIT http://charlottewater.org
FINAL APPROVAL
PROJECT NUMBER:
7/7/2023
SDRUR-2023-00003
Keith Schell
Peter Rodriguez
Craig Robinson
Jacobus Peeters
APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Josh Weaver
07/07/2023

APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN AND CUT/FILL ANALYSIS
OHE
OHE
GAS
GAS GAS GASFO FO UEWWWWWUE
OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE OHE
FO FO
FO OHEO
H
E
OHE OHE OHE OHE
OHEOHEOHEOHE OHE
W
W
W
WOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE
FO FO FOOHEOHE OHE UEUEUEUEUEUE>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>OHE OHE OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OH
E
OH
E
OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE
O
H
E
O
H
E
O
H
E
OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE
FO FO FO FO
FOOHEOHEOHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE
OHE
OH
E
OH
E
UE UEUEUE
OHE
GASFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOUE
UE
UE
FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO
GAS
UE UE UE UE UE UE UEUEUE
UEUEGAS
GAS
GAS
GAS
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE6W6W6WUEUEUEUEUEUEUE
UE UE UE UE UE UE OHEOHEOHE
OHE
OHE OHEOHEOHEOHEOHE
OHE
OHE
UE UE UEUE
UEFOFOFO
FOFOOHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE
OHE OHE OHE OHE6W6W6W6WPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPL
FO FO
FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FOGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS
GASGAS6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W 6W
UE UE UE UE UE UE UE
OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEUE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE
16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16WGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS GAS GAS GAS
Tax # 173-041-73
Tax # 173-041-81Tax # 173-041-82
Tax # 173-041-85 Tax # 173-041-67 Tax # 173-041-84
Tax #
173-041-83(6625 South Blvd)
(6607 South Blvd)(6547 South Blvd)(6543 South Blvd)
(6535 South Blvd)
(6531 South Blvd)
(6501 South Blvd)GASGASOHE OHE OHE OHE
OHEGASFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO
COORDINATE RELOCATION
OF EX XFORMER ON POLE
COORDINATE RELOCATION
OF POWER SERVICE TO
OFFSITE BILLBOARD
RELOCATE EXISTING STREET LIGHT.
COORDINATE W/ DUKE ENERGY
REMOVE EX. SITE
LIGHTING AND
ASSOCIATED WIRING
(TYP)
REMOVE EX. SITE
LIGHTING AND
ASSOCIATED WIRING
(TYP)
REMOVE EX. SITE
LIGHTING AND
ASSOCIATED WIRING
(TYP)
REMOVE EX. SITE
LIGHTING AND
ASSOCIATED WIRING
(TYP)
RELOCATE EXISTING STREET LIGHT.
COORDINATE W/ DUKE ENERGY
RELOCATE EXISTING STREET LIGHT.
COORDINATE W/ DUKE ENERGY
RELOCATE EX. POWER SERVICE POLE.
COORDINATE W/ DUKE ENERGY
RELOCATE EXISTING STREET LIGHT.
COORDINATE W/ DUKE ENERGYEXISTING WATER SERVICE TO BE DISMANTLED BY
CLTW (METER #XXXXX). CONTRACTOR SHALL CUT AND
PLUG PRIVATE PIPING JUST BEHIND THE WATER
SERVICE METER BOX (ON THE BUILDING SIDE).
DISMANTLEMENT OF EXISTING WATER SERVICE
METER, BOX & TAP SHALL BE DONE BY CLTW.
EX. PUBLIC FH TO
BE RELOCATED
EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO BE DISMANTLED BY
CLTW (METER #XXXXX). CONTRACTOR SHALL CUT AND
PLUG PRIVATE PIPING JUST BEHIND THE WATER
SERVICE METER BOX (ON THE BUILDING SIDE).
DISMANTLEMENT OF EXISTING WATER SERVICE
METER, BOX & TAP SHALL BE DONE BY CLTW.
EX. BACKFLOW TO BE REMOVED
FOLLOWING METER DISMANTLEMENT.
EX. SEWER LATERAL TO BE REMOVED.
COORDINATE ABANDONMENT WITH CLTW
EX. BUILDING TO BE REMOVED
EX. BUILDING TO BE REMOVED
EX. BUILDING TO BE REMOVED
EX. BUILDING TO BE REMOVED
EX. SEGRA FIBER MAIN TO BE
RELOCATED. CONTRACTOR TO
COORDINATE WITH SEGRA
EX. COMM SERVICE TO BE
REMOVED
EX. 48" PIPE TO BE REMOVED OR
GROUTED AND ABANDONED IN PLACE
EX. SEGRA FIBER MAIN TO BE
RELOCATED. CONTRACTOR TO
COORDINATE WITH SEGRA
SAW CUT LINE FOR PAVEMENT
WIDENING. SEE CHAPTER 8 -
OFFSITE ROADWAY
SAW CUT LINE FOR PAVEMENT
WIDENING. SEE CHAPTER 8 -
OFFSITE ROADWAY
SAW CUT LINE FOR EX SIDEWALK.
SEE CHAPTER 8 - OFFSITE
ROADWAY
COORDINATE GAS SERVICE
REMOVAL WITH PNG
EXISTING 15" RCP TO BE
ABANDONED IN PLACE
EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE
TO BE ABANDONED IN PLACE
EXISTING 15" RCP TO BE
ABANDONED IN PLACE
REMOVE EX. SITE
LIGHTING AND
ASSOCIATED WIRING
(TYP)
SAW CUT LINE FOR EX SIDEWALK.
SEE CHAPTER 8 - OFFSITE
ROADWAY
COORDINATE FIBER OPTIC
SERVICE REMOVAL W/
SERVICE PROVIDER
6500 SOUTH BLVD
TAC HARRELSON FORD, LLC
6500 SOUTH BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NC
1020338
EXISTING CONDITIONS &
DEMOLITION PLAN
N/A
JSI
JHF
JSI
C2-00
3/31/2023 12:44 PM JONATHAN FLEHAN P:\CLT\_2020\1020338\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\1020338_PLN_DEMO.DWG
KEY MAP
SEAL
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE
PROJECT
NORTH
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
VERT:
HORZ:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704.333.0325
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE # C-0658
ENG FIRM #: C-0658

SDRU-2022-00002
APPROVAL 02.09.2023
1" = 40'
8040020
DEMOLITION NOTES:
1.DEMOLITION, GRUBBING, CLEARING, AND/OR GRADING SHALL NOT OCCUR UNTIL PLANS
APPROVED AND PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING IS CONDUCTED. DEMOLITION AND
REMOVAL OPERATIONS SHALL COMMENCE AFTER REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES ARE IN PLACE AND ARE FUNCTIONAL. COORDINATE WITH CITY EROSION
CONTROL INSPECTOR ON EXTENT OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED TO
HANDLE BUILDING DEMOLITION.
EXTENT OF SITE CLEARING IS SHOWN ON EROSION CONTROL PLANS.
2.CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING REQUIRED DEMOLITION PERMITS PRIOR
TO BEGINNING DEMOLITION.
3.SITE DEMOLITION WORK INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO:
A. BUILDING DEMOLITION
B. CONCRETE & ASPHALT SURFACES
B. SITE UTILITIES
C. LANDSCAPING
4.CONDUCT SITE DEMOLITION OPERATIONS TO ENSURE MINIMUM INTERFERENCE WITH
ROADS, STREETS, WALKS, AND OTHER ADJACENT OCCUPIED OR USED FACILITIES. DO
NOT CLOSE OR OBSTRUCT STREETS, WALKS OR OTHER OCCUPIED OR USED
FACILITIES WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION.
5.DEMOLITION DEBRIS, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE NOTED, SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY
OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. ALL DEBRIS SHALL BE
DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR IN A LEGAL LANDFILL IN A TIMELY
MANNER. NO SALVAGE OR SALE OF DEMOLISHED MATERIALS ON SITE WILL BE
ALLOWED WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER.
6.CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE EXISTING ABOVE GROUND AND UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES IN AREAS OF WORK. IF UTILITIES ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE, PROVIDE
ADEQUATE MEANS OF SUPPORT AND PROTECTION DURING DEMOLITION OPERATION.
7.SHOULD UNCHARTED, OR INCORRECTLY CHARTED PIPING OR OTHER UTILITIES BE
ENCOUNTERED DURING DEMOLITION, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT PROJECT
ENGINEER AND UTILITY OWNER FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION.
8.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, SIDEWALKS, PAVEMENTS,
AND OTHER FACILITIES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY SETTLEMENT, LATERAL MOVEMENT,
UNDERMINING, WASHOUT AND OTHER HAZARDS CREATED BY THE DEMOLITION
OPERATION.
9.CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR
BETTER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR AS PART OF CONTINUING CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY PER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS AS PERMITTED.
10.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL VISIBLE OR REASONABLY IDENTIFIABLE MATERIAL,
EQUIPMENT, ETC. FROM THE SITE IF NOT NEEDED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE.
11.THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DETERMINED
FROM AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE
CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER AND OWNER ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR
INACCURACY. CONTRACTOR IS FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL
APPROPRIATE PARTIES AND ASSURING THAT UTILITIES ARE LOCATED PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. CALL NC ONE CALL (PREVIOUSLY ULOCO) AT
1-800-632-4949 FOR UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND DEPTH
OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
12.ALL DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING
CODES AND LOCAL RESTRICTIONS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH ALL OF
THE CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES.
13.PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF DEMOLITION, CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE
HIS ACTIVITIES WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES SERVING THIS AREA TO LOCATE ALL
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING PRIVATE
AND PUBLIC UTILITIES AS REQUIRED. RELOCATION COORDINATION SHALL BE THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. ASSOCIATED FEES SHALL BE THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER.
14.ALL PAVING REMOVAL AND DEMOLITION SHALL BE PERFORMED AS SHOWN ON THE
PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER OR OWNER.
15.RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF OVERHEAD OR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE
COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY.
16.ALL PROPOSED PAVEMENT CUTS SHALL BE SAW CUT ONLY.
17.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS ADVANCE NOTICE TO THE
OWNER PRIOR TO STARTING DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES.
18.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND PROTECT ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES. ANY WORK
ASSOCIATED WITH SAID UTILITIES TO BE COORDINATED WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY
COMPANY. DEMOLITION OF UTILITIES WHICH ARE ACTIVE SHALL BE SEQUENCED TO
ALLOW FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW OR REROUTED LINES, PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF
EXISTING PORTION. REFER TO UTILITY PLANS FOR PROPOSED WORK.
19.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE OR ABANDON IN PLACE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
PREVIOUSLY SERVING EXISTING STRUCTURES UNLESS INDICATED ON DEMOLITION
PLAN TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED.
20.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE STORM DEMOLITION WITH STORM DRAIN
IMPROVEMENTS TO MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
21.SHOULD THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY ADDITIONAL ITEMS THAT MAY REQUIRE
DEMOLITION (FENCES, GUARD RAIL, ETC.) - THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE
ENGINEER FOR FURTHER DIRECTION.
22.ALL EXISTING WATER METERS SHALL BE DISMANTLED BY CHARLOTTE WATER.
CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE, CUT, AND CAP EXISTING PRIVATE WATER SERVICES
BEHIND THE METER. ABANDONMENT OF WATER METERS AND NEW SERVICE
APPLICATIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED AT THE SAME TIME FOR COORDINATION OF
CAPACITY FEE CREDITS.
23.DEMOLITION WITHIN ADJACENT RIGHT OF WAYS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MOST RECENT
EDITION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC
CONTROL DETAILS AND SHEETS C8-25 & C8-26. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL NEW
CURB AND GUTTER AND STREET PAVEMENT IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING DEMOLITION
ACTIVITIES THAT OCCUR IN THE RIGHT OF WAY PER SITE PLAN.
24.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT NCDOT AT 980-523-0000 PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, TO
OBTAIN THE NECESSARY RIGHT OF WAY & DRIVEWAY PERMITS FOR ANY
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AND COORDINATION OF
PEDESTRIAN ROUTING WHEN SIDEWALK HAS BEEN REMOVED.
NOTE: ALL ENTITIES IN RED TO BE REMOVED
TREE PROTECTION FENCE
EX. FENCE
EX. WATER LINE
EX. SANITAY SEWER LINE
EX. UNDER GROUND POWER
EX. FIBER OPTIC LINE
EX. OVERHEAD UTILITY
EX. STORM DRAINAGE
EX. GAS LINE
EX. UNDER GROUND CONDUIT UGC
ST
UGP
SS
W
X
LEGEND
EX. CURB, WALL AND UTILITY REMOVAL
EX. PAVEMENT REMOVAL
MISC. DEMO
EX. 1.5" PAVEMENT MILL &
OVERLAY
2023.03.31 15:18:09-04'00'
EROSION CONTROL
ENGINEERING
CDOT
URBAN FORESTRY
NOTE: SCHEDULE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGAT LEAST 48 HRS. PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY USING THE ONLINE FORM FOUND AT http://charlottenc.gov/ld
NOTE: THIS PLAN APPROVAL DOES NOT INCLUDE COMMERCIAL ZONING. ALL BUILDING PERMITS AND ZONING APPROVALS CAN BE OBTAINED AT MECKLENBURG COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT. PLEASE CALL CTAC AT
704-314-CODE(2633) FOR MORE INFORMATION.
PCSO / DETENTION / DRAINAGE PLAN
TREE ORDINANCE
PLANNING
UMUDD / MUDD / PED / TOD
NOTE: THIS PLAN APPROVAL DOES NOT INCLUDE CHARLOTTE WATER. FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CALL 704-336-5499 OR
VISIT http://charlottewater.org
FINAL APPROVAL
PROJECT NUMBER:
7/7/2023
SDRUR-2023-00003
Keith Schell
Peter Rodriguez
Craig Robinson
Jacobus Peeters
APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Josh Weaver
07/07/2023
OHE OHE
FO FO FO
FO FO >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>FO FO FO FO
FO
OHE
GASFO
UE
OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE6W6W6W OHE6W6W6W6WPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLGASGAS6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W
16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16WGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS
FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FOFOFO
2726 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 3512346758910112021192223242513141215161718
49
48
50
51
52
53
43
42
44
45
46
47
36
37
38
39
40
41
55
56
54
57
58
59
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
60
61
62
63
64
65
76
77
75
78
79
80
86
87
88
89
81
82
83
84
85
91
92
93
94
95
90
96
97
9899
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
108
109
110
107
111
112
113
121
120
122
123
124 114
115
116
117
118
119
158157
156
159
155154
153
152
164 165
163162161160
BLDG #1 BLDG #2 BLDG #3 BLDG #4 BLDG #5 BLDG #6BLDG # 7BLDG # 8BLDG # 9BLDG # 10BLDG # 11BLDG # 14BLDG # 15BLDG # 17BLDG # 18BLDG # 19BLDG # 20BLDG # 21BLDG # 16BLDG # 13BLDG # 12BLDG # 22
BLDG # 23
BLDG # 24
BLDG # 25
BLDG # 26
149
150
148
147
146
151
145
144
143
140
141
139
138
137
142
136
134
135
131
132
130
129128
133
127
126
125
662.63 TW
657.55 BW
5.08 FT
661.62 TW
657.41 BW
4.20 FT
662.51 TW
656.11 BW
6.41 FT
662.11 TW
654.09 BW
8.02 FT
661.37 TW
654.99 BW
6.38 FT
658.69 TW
653.87 BW
4.81 FT
656.72 TW
652.72 BW
4.00 FT
658.56 TW
653.02 BW
5.54 FT
661.74 TW
655.11 BW
6.63 FT
664.39 TW
656.33 BW
8.06 FT
665.71 TW
657.16 BW
8.55 FT
665.80 TW
657.54 BW
8.26 FT
STOOP:653.84
STOOP:
653.18
STOOP:
652.51
STOOP:
651.84
STOOP:
649.62
STOOP:
648.95
STOOP:648.29 STOOP:
647.62 STOOP:646.95
STOOP:
646.95 STOOP:646.95 STOOP:644.82 STOOP:644.15 STOOP:
643.49
STOOP:
642.82
STOOP:
642.82
STOOP:
642.15 STOOP:642.15
STOOP:642.03 STOOP:
642.03
STOOP:642.70 STOOP:643.36 STOOP:643.36
STOOP:
644.03
STOOP:644.70
FFE: 654.17
GFE: 652.71
FFE: 653.31
GFE: 652.04
FFE: 652.84
GFE: 651.38
FFE: 652.17
GFE: 650.71
FFE: 649.95
GFE: 649.03
FFE: 649.28
GFE: 648.36
FFE: 648.62
GFE: 647.70
FFE: 647.95
GFE: 647.03
FFE: 647.28
GFE: 646.36
FFE: 647.28
GFE: 646.36
FFE: 647.28
GFE: 646.36
FFE: 645.15
GFE: 644.23
FFE: 644.48
GFE: 643.56
FFE: 643.82
GFE: 642.90
FFE: 643.45
GFE: 642.23
FFE: 643.15
GFE: 642.23
FFE: 642.48
GFE: 641.56
FFE: 642.48
GFE: 641.56
FFE: 642.36
GFE: 641.44
FFE: 642.36
GFE: 641.44
FFE: 643.03
GFE: 642.11
FFE: 643.69
GFE: 642.23
FFE: 643.69
GFE: 642.77
FFE: 644.36
GFE: 643.44
FFE: 645.03
GFE: 644.11
FFE: 647.42
GFE: 646.50
FFE: 647.42
GFE: 646.50
FFE: 648.09
GFE: 646.63
FFE: 648.75
GFE: 647.29
FFE: 649.42
GFE: 647.96
FFE: 650.09
GFE: 648.63
FFE: 651.83
GFE: 650.37
FFE: 652.50
GFE: 651.04
FFE: 653.83
GFE: 652.37
FFE: 654.50
GFE: 653.04
STOOP:647.09 STOOP:647.09
STOOP:
647.76
STOOP:648.42 STOOP:
649.09
STOOP:
649.76
STOOP:
651.50 STOOP:652.17
STOOP:
653.50
STOOP:
654.17FFE: 652.82GFE: 651.36STOOP:652.49FFE: 652.82GFE: 651.36STOOP:652.49FFE: 652.82GFE: 651.90STOOP:652.49FFE: 653.49GFE: 652.03STOOP:653.16FFE: 653.49GFE: 652.57STOOP:653.16FFE: 653.49GFE: 652.57STOOP:653.16STOOP:654.05STOOP:654.05STOOP:654.72STOOP:655.38STOOP:655.38STOOP:656.05GFE: 653.46GFE: 653.46GFE: 654.13GFE: 654.25GFE: 654.76GFE: 654.92FFE: 654.38FFE: 654.38FFE: 655.05FFE: 655.71FFE: 655.71FFE: 656.38FFE: 655.76GFE: 654.84STOOP:655.43FFE: 655.76GFE: 654.84STOOP:655.43FFE: 655.76GFE: 654.84STOOP:655.43FFE: 655.09GFE: 654.17STOOP:654.76FFE: 655.09GFE: 654.17STOOP:654.76FFE: 654.43GFE: 653.51STOOP:654.10FFE: 653.52GFE: 652.60STOOP:653.19FFE: 653.52GFE: 652.60STOOP:653.19FFE: 652.85GFE: 651.93STOOP:652.52FFE: 652.85GFE: 651.93STOOP:652.52FFE: 652.19GFE: 651.27STOOP:651.86FFE: 652.19GFE: 651.27STOOP:651.86FFE: 647.70GFE: 646.24STOOP:647.37FFE: 647.70GFE: 646.24STOOP:647.37FFE: 648.37GFE: 646.91STOOP:648.04FFE: 648.37GFE: 646.91STOOP:648.04FFE: 649.04GFE: 647.57STOOP:648.71FFE: 649.04GFE: 647.57STOOP:648.71FFE: 650.48GFE: 649.02STOOP:650.15FFE: 651.15GFE: 649.69STOOP:650.82FFE: 651.15GFE: 649.69STOOP:650.82FFE: 651.82GFE: 650.35STOOP:651.49FFE: 652.48GFE: 651.02STOOP:652.15FFE: 648.85GFE: 647.93FFE: 648.85GFE: 647.93FFE: 648.18GFE: 647.26FFE: 647.52GFE: 646.60FFE: 647.52GFE: 646.60FFE: 646.85GFE: 645.93FFE: 652.25GFE: 650.79FFE: 651.59GFE: 650.12FFE: 650.25GFE: 648.79FFE: 649.59GFE: 648.12FFE: 646.25GFE: 644.79FFE: 644.92GFE: 643.45FFE: 652.75GFE: 651.29FFE: 652.09GFE: 650.62FFE: 651.42GFE: 649.95FFE: 650.75GFE: 649.29FFE: 650.08GFE: 648.62FFE: 648.75GFE: 647.29FFE: 648.25GFE: 646.79FFE: 647.59GFE: 646.12FFE: 646.92GFE: 645.45FFE: 651.33GFE: 650.41FFE: 651.33GFE: 650.41FFE: 650.66GFE: 649.74FFE: 650.00GFE: 649.08FFE: 649.42GFE: 647.95FFE: 655.61GFE: 654.69FFE: 654.94GFE: 654.02FFE: 654.28GFE: 653.36FFE: 652.94GFE: 652.02FFE: 653.61GFE: 652.69FFE: 645.61GFE: 644.69FFE: 645.61GFE: 644.69FFE: 646.28GFE: 645.36FFE: 646.94GFE: 646.02FFE: 647.61GFE: 646.69FFE: 646.24GFE: 645.32FFE: 649.57GFE: 648.65FFE: 650.24GFE: 649.32FFE: 650.91GFE: 649.99FFE: 651.57GFE: 650.65FFE: 652.32GFE: 651.40FFE: 653.65GFE: 652.73FFE: 654.32GFE: 653.40FFE: 654.99GFE: 654.07FFE: 655.65GFE: 654.73FFE: 652.99FFE: 647.57GFE: 646.65FFE: 646.91GFE: 645.99FFE: 648.91GFE: 647.99FFE: 649.28GFE: 648.36FFE: 649.95GFE: 649.03FFE: 650.61GFE: 649.69FFE: 651.28GFE: 650.36STOOP:645.28STOOP:645.28STOOP:645.95STOOP:646.61STOOP:647.28STOOP:648.95STOOP:649.62STOOP:650.28STOOP:650.955.50%STOOP:644.59STOOP:645.92STOOP:646.59STOOP:647.26STOOP:647.92STOOP:649.26STOOP:649.92STOOP:651.26STOOP:651.92STOOP:645.91STOOP:646.58STOOP:647.24STOOP:649.24STOOP:649.91STOOP:650.58STOOP:651.24TS: 646.52BS: 644.52STOOP:648.42STOOP:651.99STOOP:652.66STOOP:649.09STOOP:649.75STOOP:653.32STOOP:653.99STOOP:650.42STOOP:651.09STOOP:654.66STOOP:655.32STOOP:651.76STOOP:652.42GFE: 652.07STOOP:652.61STOOP:653.28STOOP:653.95STOOP:654.61STOOP:655.28-5.00%-5.01%6.09%-2.50%-2.50%-5.00%-5.00%-4.99%-5.00%-2.00%-2.65%-1.03%642.30644.77651.42
652.50 649.47 646.72
642.28 644.67 646.25 648.74 651.63 652.53
644.48
644.75
FFE: 655.05
GFE: 652.50
FFE: 655.05
GFE: 652.50
FFE: 655.72
GFE: 653.17
FFE: 657.05
GFE: 655.59
FFE: 655.72
GFE: 653.71
FFE: 656.39
GFE: 653.84
GFE: 654.38
FFE: 656.39
GFE: 654.92
FFE: 656.39
FFE: 657.05
GFE: 655.59656.28656.20
STOOP:
656.72
STOOP:
656.72
STOOP:
656.06
STOOP:
656.06
STOOP:
656.06
STOOP:
655.39
STOOP:
655.39
STOOP:
654.72
STOOP:
654.72
FFE: 654.91
GFE: 652.36
FFE: 654.91
GFE: 652.36
FFE: 654.91
GFE: 652.36
FFE: 654.91
GFE: 652.36
FFE: 654.91
GFE: 652.36
FFE: 655.57
GFE: 653.03
GFE: 653.03
FFE: 654.91
GFE: 652.36
FFE: 655.57
FFE: 654.91
GFE: 652.36654.31654.36STOOP:
654.58
STOOP:
654.58
STOOP:
654.58
STOOP:
655.24
STOOP:
655.24
STOOP:
654.58
STOOP:
654.58
STOOP:
654.58
STOOP:
654.58
FFE: 653.12
GFE: 650.57
FFE: 653.12
GFE: 650.57
FFE: 653.12
GFE: 650.57
FFE: 653.78
GFE: 651.78
FFE: 653.12
GFE: 651.11
FFE: 653.12
GFE: 651.11
GFE: 651.24
FFE: 653.78
GFE: 651.24
FFE: 653.78
FFE: 653.78
GFE: 651.78653.13653.08STOOP:
653.45
STOOP:
653.45
STOOP:
653.45
STOOP:
653.45
STOOP:
652.79
STOOP:
652.79
STOOP:
652.79
STOOP:
652.79
STOOP:
652.79
FFE: 657.24
FFE: 656.57
FFE: 653.90
FFE: 656.57
FFE: 655.90
FFE: 655.24
FFE: 655.90
FFE: 654.57653.86654.07STOOP:
653.57
STOOP:
654.24
STOOP:
654.91
STOOP:
655.57
STOOP:
655.57
STOOP:
656.24
STOOP:
656.24
STOOP:
656.91
FFE: 657.78
FFE: 657.78
FFE: 657.78
FFE: 657.78
STOOP:
657.45
STOOP:
657.45
STOOP:
657.45
STOOP:
657.45
FFE: 657.78 FFE: 657.78657.03657.06
STOOP:
657.45
STOOP:
657.45656.93656.96657.03657.13657.16657.23657.26657.33657.36657.38657.41GFE: 655.23
GFE: 654.57
GFE: 654.57
GFE: 653.90
GFE: 653.36
GFE: 652.69
GFE: 652.57
GFE: 651.90
GFE: 655.78 GFE: 655.78 GFE: 655.78 GFE: 656.32 GFE: 656.32 GFE: 656.32
656.31
657.41
654.40
652.01 652.42
651.81
650.76
650.30
652.37
654.86
655.87
656.23
REDI-ROCK GRAVITY RETAINING
WALL (TO BE DESIGNED BY
OTHERS)
650
650 655
6
5
5
655651651652
652 65265
2 6536
5
3 6546
5
4
6546
5
6
6566
5
7
657645
650
644
646
647
648
649
650655651652653654656656656657658A42-JB (RIM 658.11)A54-AD (RIM 657.37)
A12-JB (RIM 655.03)
A50A-DI (RIM 656.92)
A33-AD (RIM 656.63)
A52-AD (RIM 656.55)
A11-JB (RIM 655.35)
A29-DI (RIM 654.87)
A34-AD (RIM 655.19)
A55-AD (RIM 654.58)
A50-DI (RIM 654.62)
A32-AD (RIM 653.85)
A39-DI (RIM 650.00)
A46-AD (RIM 653.33)
A53-AD (RIM 653.03)
A49-DI (RIM 652.89)
A47-AD (RIM 652.45)
A23-DI (RIM 651.43)
A30-DI (RIM 651.39)
A45-DI (RIM 651.08)
A17B-DI (RIM 650.80)
A41-DI (RIM 650.32)
A44-DI (RIM 649.86)
A38-DI (RIM 649.66)
A22-DI (RIM 649.57)
A19A-DI (RIM 647.63)
A40-DI (RIM 647.21)
A17A-DI (RIM 646.05)
A48-AD (RIM 646.80)
A28-AD (RIM 647.77)
A30-CB (RIM 645.20)
A37-DI (RIM 645.92)A36-DI (RIM 645.69)
A21-DI (RIM 645.99)A20-DI (RIM 645.61)
A6-JB (RIM 643.98)
A15-DI (RIM 644.64)
A25-AD (RIM 644.35)
A5-CB (RIM 643.24)
A24-AD (RIM 644.37)
A18-DI (RIM 642.51)
A16-DI (RIM 642.84)
A19-DI (RIM 642.79)
A14-CB (RIM 644.15)
A13-CB (RIM 643.59)
A10-JB (RIM 642.58)
A17-DI (RIM 640.95)
A27-CB (RIM 641.82)A26-CB (RIM 641.22)
A8-CB (RIM 637.99)
A7-CB (RIM 637.98)6456506
4
2
6
4
2 643
643643643 6446446446
4
6647648649651652652 FOUNDATION WALL
FOUNDATION WALL
645
650
64
2
643
644
646
647
648
649
651
645
650
644646
647
648
649
651
652
645
642
643
644
646
647
648
649
645
65
0
6
4
6
64
7
64
8
64
9
65
5
6
5
1
6
5
2
6
5
3
6
5
4
64064564164264364464564
2
643 644646A15A-DA (RIM 645.06)A19B-DI (RIM 643.51)
651
652
653
654
650646 647648649651652653640640 6456456506506556396
3
9 64164
1
642642643643644644646646647647648648649649651651652652653653
65465665765
8 659660
658
659
SWALING STRAFEE DR
CASTLEREA DRCRUISETOWN DRBYBLOS LNHARRELSON RDBEIRUT DR
DRUMALEE CR
KINGSPAN DR
6500 SOUTH BLVD
TAC HARRELSON FORD, LLC
6500 SOUTH BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NC
1020338
GRADING PLAN
N/A
JSI
JHF
JSI
C4-00
6/27/2023 3:52 PM JONATHAN FLEHAN P:\CLT\_2020\1020338\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\1020338_PLN_GRAD.DWG
KEY MAP
SEAL
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE
PROJECT
NORTH
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
VERT:
HORZ:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704.333.0325
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE # C-0658
ENG FIRM #: C-0658

LAND DEVELOPMENT -
2ND SUBMITTAL 05.17.2023
LAND DEVELOPMENT -
1ST SUBMITTAL 03.31.2023
SDRU-2022-00002
APPROVAL 02.09.2023
1" = 40'
8040020
GRADING NOTES:
1.EXISTING CONDITIONS FROM INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM A
COMBINATION OF SURVEYS AND GIS INFORMATION. SITE SHOULD BE
SURVEYED TO VERIFY EXISTING GRADES, UTILITY LOCATIONS, AND
EXISTING STRUCTURE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF
CONSTRUCTION.
2.ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS REFLECT FINISHED GRADES.
3.ALL ELEVATIONS ARE IN REFERENCE TO THE BENCHMARK WHICH
MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO
GROUND BREAKING.
4.REFER TO SOILS ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION FOR DIRECTIONS
ON FILL COMPACTION AND ANY STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS.
5.PERMANENT CUT AND FILL SLOPES PLACED ON A SUITABLE
FOUNDATION SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED AT 2:1 (HORIZONTAL AND
VERTICAL) OR FLATTER. PERMANENT SLOPES OF 3:1 SHOULD BE
CONSTRUCTED WHERE MOWING IS DESIRABLE.
6.THE PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOWN IN ROAD SECTIONS ARE
FINISHED ELEVATIONS INCLUDING ASPHALT. REFER TO PAVEMENT
CROSS-SECTION DATA TO ESTABLISH CORRECT SUB-BASE OR
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE ELEVATIONS TO BE COMPLETED UNDER
THIS CONTRACT.
7.LIMITS OF CLEARING SHOWN ARE BASED ON CUT AND FILL SLOPES
OR OTHER GRADING REQUIREMENTS.
8.ANY GRADING BEYOND THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION SHOWN IS
SUBJECT TO A FINE.
9.ALL SLOPES MUST BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITH IN 15 WORKING
DAYS OR 30 CALENDAR DAYS, WHICHEVER IS SHORTER. ALL OTHER
AREAS, 15 WORKING DAYS OR 90 CALENDAR DAYS, WHICHEVER IS
SHORTER. REFER TO EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE FOR
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
10.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS
INDICATED ON EROSION CONTROL PLAN. NO DEVICE MAY BE
REMOVED UNTIL SITE IS STABILIZED.
11.CONTRACTOR SHALL BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY WITH
EXISTING CONTOURS.
12.GRADING MORE THAN 1 ACRE WITHOUT AN APPROVED EROSION
CONTROL PLAN IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.
13.COORDINATE ALL CURB AND STREET GRADES IN INTERSECTION WITH
INSPECTOR.
14.IN ROLLING AND HILLY TERRAINS, SWEEPING OF THE STONE BASE
AND/OR APPLICATION OF A TACK COAT MAY BE REQUIRED NEAR
INTERSECTIONS. THESE REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ESTABLISHED BY
THE INSPECTOR AND BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS.
15.APPROVAL OF THIS SITE PLAN IS NOT AN AUTHORIZATION TO GRADE
ADJACENT PROPERTIES. WHEN FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT
OFF-SITE GRADING, PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE
AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS.
16.IN ORDER TO ENSURE PROPER DRAINAGE, KEEP A MINIMUM OF 0.5%
SLOPE ON THE CURB.
17.SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE
STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY IF DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE INSPECTOR.
18.THE PURPOSE OF THE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT (SDE) IS TO
PROVIDE STORM WATER CONVEYANCE. BUILDINGS ARE NOT
PERMITTED IN THE EASEMENT AREA. ANY OTHER OBJECTS WHICH
IMPEDE STORM WATER FLOW OR SYSTEM MAINTENANCE ARE ALSO
PROHIBITED.
19.HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
INSTALLED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED PUBLIC STREET
RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY'S INSPECTOR PRIOR
TO ANY BACKFILL BEING PLACED. BACKFILL MATERIAL MUST BE
APPROVED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE
MATERIAL WITHIN THE PUBLIC STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY.
20.PE SEALED SHOP DRAWINGS FOR RETAINING WALL MUST BE
SUBMITTED TO CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
21."AS-BUILT" DRAWINGS AND PLANS OF THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM,
INCLUDING DESIGNED DITCHES, MUST BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO
SUBDIVISION FINAL INSPECTION TO THE CITY/COUNTY ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY/COUNTY SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE.
22.THERE SHALL BE NO DEMOLITION LANDFILL ON SITE.
23.MAXIMUM SLOPE ACROSS ACCESSIBLE PARKING SHALL BE 2.0%
ACCESSIBILITY NOTES:
1.MAX CROSS SLOPE ON PAVED SURFACES SHALL BE 2% MAXIMUM,
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
2.MAX RUNNING SLOPE ON PAVED SURFACES SHALL BE 5% MAXIMUM,
UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
3.ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL BE MAINTAINED FREE OF
OVERHANGING OBSTRUCTIONS TO 80" MINIMUM, AND PROTRUDING
OBJECTS GREATER THAN 4" PROJECTION FROM WALL AND ABOVE 27"
AND LESS THAN 80". CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THERE ARE
NO BARRIERS IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL.
4.ALL CURB RAMPS SHALL BE BROOM FINISHED PERPENDICULAR TO
SLOPE.
5.ALL CURB RAMPS SHALL HAVE A 1:12 MAX SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION
OF TRAVEL, 2% MAX CROSS SLOPE.
6.IT IS THE INTENT OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO COMPLY WITH
ALL APPROPRIATE FAIR HOUSING ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES AND
GENERAL NOTES FOR PUBLIC AND COMMON USE FACILITIES. REPORT
ANY DISCREPANCIES TO LANDDESIGN.
INSET A (SEE C4-05)INSET B (SEE C4-05)
2023.06.28 09:14:59-04'00'
EROSION CONTROL
ENGINEERING
CDOT
URBAN FORESTRY
NOTE: SCHEDULE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGAT LEAST 48 HRS. PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY USING THE ONLINE FORM FOUND AT http://charlottenc.gov/ld
NOTE: THIS PLAN APPROVAL DOES NOT INCLUDE COMMERCIAL ZONING. ALL BUILDING PERMITS AND ZONING APPROVALS CAN BE OBTAINED AT MECKLENBURG COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT. PLEASE CALL CTAC AT
704-314-CODE(2633) FOR MORE INFORMATION.
PCSO / DETENTION / DRAINAGE PLAN
TREE ORDINANCE
PLANNING
UMUDD / MUDD / PED / TOD
NOTE: THIS PLAN APPROVAL DOES NOT INCLUDE CHARLOTTE WATER. FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CALL 704-336-5499 OR
VISIT http://charlottewater.org
FINAL APPROVAL
PROJECT NUMBER:
7/7/2023
SDRUR-2023-00003
Keith Schell
Peter Rodriguez
Craig Robinson
Jacobus Peeters
APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Josh Weaver
07/07/2023
PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL
TOTAL EXISTING
IMPERVIOUS (1978)
8.14 AC.PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL
TOTAL EXISTING
IMPERVIOUS (1978)
8.14 AC.
TOTAL ADDED BUA (2008)
0.07 AC.PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL PL
TOTAL REMOVED
IMPERVIOUS 8.20 AC.
TOTAL PLANNED
IMPERVIOUS (2022)
6.82 AC
6500 SOUTH BLVD
TAC HARRELSON FORD, LLC
6500 SOUTH BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NC
1020338
IMPERVIOUS MAP
N/A
JSI
JHF
JSI
C5-03
3/31/2023 12:53 PM JONATHAN FLEHAN P:\CLT\_2020\1020338\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\1020338_PLN_IMP.DWG
KEY MAP
SEAL
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE
PROJECT
NORTH
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
VERT:
HORZ:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704.333.0325
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE # C-0658
ENG FIRM #: C-0658

SDRU-2022-00002
APPROVAL 02.09.2023
1" = 100'
200100050
HATCH LEGEND
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA
PRE-DEVELOPED IMPERVIOUS (1978)
8.14 AC.
PRE-DEVELOPED BUILT UPON AREA (2008)
8.21 AC.
POST-DEVELOPED BUILT UPON AREA (2022)
5.89 AC.
REMOVED IMPERVIOUS AREA
ADDED IMPERVIOUS AREA
PLANNED IMPERVIOUS AREA
POST-DEVELOPED IMPERVIOUS AREA (2022)
5.89 AC.
2023.03.31 15:20:22-04'00'
EROSION CONTROL
ENGINEERING
CDOT
URBAN FORESTRY
NOTE: SCHEDULE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGAT LEAST 48 HRS. PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY USING THE ONLINE FORM FOUND AT http://charlottenc.gov/ld
NOTE: THIS PLAN APPROVAL DOES NOT INCLUDE COMMERCIAL ZONING. ALL BUILDING PERMITS AND ZONING APPROVALS CAN BE OBTAINED AT MECKLENBURG COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT. PLEASE CALL CTAC AT
704-314-CODE(2633) FOR MORE INFORMATION.
PCSO / DETENTION / DRAINAGE PLAN
TREE ORDINANCE
PLANNING
UMUDD / MUDD / PED / TOD
NOTE: THIS PLAN APPROVAL DOES NOT INCLUDE CHARLOTTE WATER. FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CALL 704-336-5499 OR
VISIT http://charlottewater.org
FINAL APPROVAL
PROJECT NUMBER:
7/7/2023
SDRUR-2023-00003
Keith Schell
Peter Rodriguez
Craig Robinson
Jacobus Peeters
APPROVED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Josh Weaver
07/07/2023
272628293031323334351234675891011202119222324251314121516171849485051525343424445464736373839404155565457585966676869707172737460616263646576777578798086878889818283848591929394959096979899100101102103104105106108109110107111112113121120122123124114115116117118119158157156159155154153152164165163162161160BLDG #1BLDG #2BLDG #3BLDG #4BLDG #5BLDG #6BLDG # 7 BLDG # 8
BLDG # 9BLDG # 10
BLDG # 11
BLDG # 14
BLDG # 15
BLDG # 17
BLDG # 18BLDG # 19BLDG # 20BLDG # 21
BLDG # 16
BLDG # 13
BLDG # 12BLDG # 22BLDG # 23BLDG # 24BLDG # 25BLDG # 26149150148147146151145144143140141139138137142136134135131132130129128133127126125OHEOHE
OHEOHEFOFOFOFOFO>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>OHEOHEFOFOFOFOFOOHEGASFOFOUEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE6W 6W 6W
OHEOHEOHEOHE6W 6W
6W 6W
PLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLPLGASGAS6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W6W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16W16WGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASTax # 173-041-73Tax # 173-041-81Tax # 173-041-82Tax # 173-041-85Tax # 173-041-67Tax # 173-041-84Tax #173-041-83(6625 South Blvd)(6607 South Blvd)(6547 South Blvd)(6543 South Blvd)(6535 South Blvd)(6531 South Blvd)(6501 South Blvd)GAS GAS
OHEGASFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFO662.63 TW657.55 BW5.08 FT661.62 TW657.41 BW4.20 FT662.51 TW656.11 BW6.41 FT662.11 TW654.09 BW8.02 FT661.37 TW654.99 BW6.38 FT658.69 TW653.87 BW4.81 FT656.72 TW652.72 BW4.00 FT658.56 TW653.02 BW5.54 FT661.74 TW655.11 BW6.63 FT664.39 TW656.33 BW8.06 FT665.71 TW657.16 BW8.55 FT665.80 TW657.54 BW8.26 FT649.897.01%645.11644.731.03%2.94%646.07645.690.39%1.52%646.83646.450.91%1.00%647.60647.211.97%3.88%648.36647.981.45%3.36%649.12648.740.98%2.89%649.89649.510.51%2.42%8.92%7.48%9.39%7.95%9.86%8.47%10.38%8.94%10.85%9.41%11.32%10.88%12.79%649.51649.12648.74648.36647.98647.60647.21646.83646.45646.07645.69645.11644.73650.27650.651.90%0.00%1.68%2.84%4.00%5.17%2.98%4.14%1.92%2.84%3.61%4.21%647.59647.36647.13646.90646.66646.43646.22646.03645.88645.762.61%3.77%648.55648.323.01%4.18%649.14648.904.04%5.20%649.60649.371.67%2.21%645.59645.48645.65645.548.45%10.01%645.88645.765.16%6.89%646.22646.039.92%12.55%646.66646.433.52%6.85%647.13646.906.30%9.62%647.59647.360.35%2.97%650.07649.844.02%7.35%650.30650.5210.26%6.98%649.60649.371.25%4.57%649.14648.907.90%11.22%648.56648.326.64%9.97%1.71%2.87%650.07649.84651.90652.2211.62%7.05%651.39651.100.05%1.52%652.13651.830.28%1.19%652.71652.420.08%1.55%653.30653.010.49%1.96%655.03654.798.02%11.50%3.58%5.05%3.22%4.69%2.81%4.29%3.14%4.61%653.30653.01652.72652.42652.13651.83651.39651.10650.46650.143.63%8.20%11.26%9.88%651.71651.815.50%7.35%2.55%4.40%2.90%4.75%3.25%5.10%3.65%1.58%2.50%647.02646.65646.28645.91645.54645.17644.80644.43644.06643.69643.13642.955.15%7.00%647.76647.398.10%9.95%648.50648.137.75%9.60%649.24648.87643.13642.767.78%9.63%644.06643.693.15%5.00%644.80644.432.80%4.65%645.54645.172.40%4.25%646.28645.912.05%3.90%648.73648.361.49%3.35%649.47649.101.09%2.94%649.84650.212.24%0.39%647.81647.442.77%4.62%654.36654.205.76%7.95%654.51654.665.86%3.68%654.05653.902.85%5.04%653.74653.595.51%7.69%653.44653.290.31%2.49%653.06652.905.77%7.96%0.97%1.74%2.50%3.27%0.68%1.45%2.21%2.98%0.44%1.21%652.41652.25652.10651.95651.79651.64651.49651.33651.18651.032.26%3.03%650.82650.66650.82650.667.75%9.94%651.20651.052.28%4.46%651.51651.355.62%7.80%651.81651.663.11%5.29%652.12651.976.45%8.63%652.42652.272.08%4.26%0.98%1.75%2.51%3.28%4.04%4.81%2.22%2.99%654.64654.49654.34654.18654.03653.88653.73653.573.75%4.52%2.37%3.13%653.42653.27653.04652.88651.26651.5811.19%6.62%650.62650.9410.91%6.34%648.50648.827.63%3.06%647.86648.187.20%2.63%647.22647.546.91%2.34%646.58646.906.48%1.92%646.08646.304.01%0.89%645.84645.937.42%6.17%645.86645.817.19%7.79%654.18654.482.73%1.26%643.80644.096.10%1.98%643.23643.514.78%0.66%
642.65
642.94
3.60%
0.52%
642.09
642.36
2.00%
1.85%
641.65
641.85
8.34%
5.41%
641.33
641.47
3.30%
1.28%
641.24
641.16
2.85%
4.06%
641.29
641.21
3.91%
4.98%
641.30
641.43
2.06%
0.14%
641.60
641.79
7.35%
4.52%
642.02
642.28
2.95%
0.77%
642.56
642.84
2.98%
0.98%
643.12
643.39
4.62%
0.66%
643.81
644.09
4.28%
0.32%
645.90
645.94
8.61%
8.00%
646.00
645.92
7.09%
8.34%
646.36
646.15
3.82%
6.85%
646.98
646.64
4.49%
9.30%
647.77
647.37
2.75%
8.45%
648.17
648.57
6.62%
0.92%
650.21
649.81
2.25%
7.95%
651.21
650.81
2.42%
3.27%
652.01
651.61
5.16%
10.85%652.81652.41
3.34%9.02%653.30653.010.49%1.96%653.89653.600.90%2.37%654.54654.305.41%8.89%654.05653.814.66%8.14%655.52655.271.06%4.54%653.57653.323.91%7.39%653.08652.849.01%12.49%652.59652.378.24%11.46%652.17652.004.68%7.09%651.93652.016.13%4.99%652.09652.1413.48%12.76%652.16652.1412.50%12.71%652.10652.023.78%4.84%651.94651.865.99%7.13%651.78651.708.27%9.42%651.15651.078.99%10.13%650.99650.9111.27%12.42%650.83650.755.84%6.99%650.67650.598.13%9.27%650.51650.438.56%9.70%650.35650.2710.84%11.99%650.19650.125.42%6.42%3.99%5.46%653.89653.60651.73651.66651.62651.5410.56%11.70%7.16%7.17%650.07650.075.86%6.71%650.16650.105.40%8.99%651.52651.277.78%11.37%652.02651.772.32%5.91%652.53652.284.71%8.29%653.03652.785.19%8.79%653.53653.287.42%10.96%654.03653.781.70%4.31%654.44654.258.69%9.67%655.16655.086.25%8.09%654.73654.606.59%7.66%655.32655.244.34%5.47%655.48655.409.71%10.89%655.64655.567.30%8.50%655.79655.724.92%6.10%655.95655.87651.77651.858.42%7.27%8.99%10.01%649.56649.32653.56653.37653.21653.00652.50652.26651.75651.52647.14646.78646.14645.87645.26644.90644.25643.99
639.38
639.48
639.71
639.81
640.09
640.19
640.39
640.49
640.89
641.07
641.47
641.74
641.98
642.33
645.89
646.09
648.76
648.97
649.32
651.06
651.35
651.62
651.88
652.44
652.69
653.26
653.51 STOOP:653.84STOOP:653.18STOOP:652.51STOOP:651.84STOOP:649.62STOOP:648.95STOOP:648.29STOOP:647.62STOOP:646.95STOOP:646.95STOOP:646.95STOOP:644.82STOOP:644.15STOOP:643.49STOOP:642.82STOOP:642.82STOOP:642.15STOOP:642.15STOOP:642.03STOOP:642.03STOOP:642.70STOOP:643.36STOOP:643.36STOOP:644.03STOOP:644.70649.13648.89648.36648.01 FFE: 654.17GFE: 652.71FFE: 653.31GFE: 652.04FFE: 652.84GFE: 651.38FFE: 652.17GFE: 650.71FFE: 649.95GFE: 649.03FFE: 649.28GFE: 648.36FFE: 648.62GFE: 647.70FFE: 647.95GFE: 647.03FFE: 647.28GFE: 646.36FFE: 647.28GFE: 646.36FFE: 647.28GFE: 646.36FFE: 645.15GFE: 644.23FFE: 644.48GFE: 643.56FFE: 643.82GFE: 642.90FFE: 643.45GFE: 642.23FFE: 643.15GFE: 642.23FFE: 642.48GFE: 641.56FFE: 642.48GFE: 641.56FFE: 642.36GFE: 641.44FFE: 642.36GFE: 641.44FFE: 643.03GFE: 642.11FFE: 643.69GFE: 642.23FFE: 643.69GFE: 642.77FFE: 644.36GFE: 643.44FFE: 645.03GFE: 644.11FFE: 647.42GFE: 646.50FFE: 647.42GFE: 646.50FFE: 648.09GFE: 646.63FFE: 648.75GFE: 647.29FFE: 649.42GFE: 647.96FFE: 650.09GFE: 648.63FFE: 651.83GFE: 650.37FFE: 652.50GFE: 651.04FFE: 653.83GFE: 652.37FFE: 654.50GFE: 653.04STOOP:647.09STOOP:647.09STOOP:647.76STOOP:648.42STOOP:649.09STOOP:649.76646.95
646.74
648.09
648.30
649.14
STOOP:651.50STOOP:652.17STOOP:653.50STOOP:654.17
FFE: 652.82
GFE: 651.36
STOOP:
652.49
FFE: 652.82
GFE: 651.36
STOOP:652.49
FFE: 652.82
GFE: 651.90
STOOP:
652.49
FFE: 653.49
GFE: 652.03
STOOP:653.16
FFE: 653.49
GFE: 652.57
STOOP:653.16
FFE: 653.49
GFE: 652.57
STOOP:653.16
652.05652.10652.14652.19652.30652.35652.46652.51652.62652.67652.78652.83647.42
647.63
653.61653.75653.86654.01654.33654.47654.79654.93655.25655.39655.71655.85STOOP:654.05 STOOP:
654.05 STOOP:654.72
STOOP:
655.38
STOOP:655.38 STOOP:656.05
GFE: 653.46 GFE: 653.46 GFE: 654.13 GFE: 654.25 GFE: 654.76 GFE: 654.92
FFE: 654.38 FFE: 654.38 FFE: 655.05 FFE: 655.71 FFE: 655.71 FFE: 656.38
FFE: 655.76
GFE: 654.84
STOOP:655.43
FFE: 655.76
GFE: 654.84
STOOP:
655.43
FFE: 655.76
GFE: 654.84
STOOP:
655.43
FFE: 655.09
GFE: 654.17
STOOP:
654.76
FFE: 655.09
GFE: 654.17
STOOP:654.76
FFE: 654.43
GFE: 653.51
STOOP:
654.10
FFE: 653.52
GFE: 652.60
STOOP:653.19
FFE: 653.52
GFE: 652.60
STOOP:653.19
FFE: 652.85
GFE: 651.93
STOOP:652.52
FFE: 652.85
GFE: 651.93
STOOP:652.52
FFE: 652.19
GFE: 651.27
STOOP:651.86
FFE: 652.19
GFE: 651.27
STOOP:
651.86 646.85646.96647.06647.17647.43647.54647.79647.91648.16648.28648.65649.78649.96650.10650.27650.66650.83651.22651.39651.78651.95652.34652.51FFE: 647.70
GFE: 646.24
STOOP:647.37
FFE: 647.70
GFE: 646.24
STOOP:
647.37
FFE: 648.37
GFE: 646.91
STOOP:648.04
FFE: 648.37
GFE: 646.91
STOOP:648.04
FFE: 649.04
GFE: 647.57
STOOP:648.71
FFE: 649.04
GFE: 647.57
STOOP:
648.71
FFE: 650.48
GFE: 649.02
STOOP:650.15
FFE: 651.15
GFE: 649.69
STOOP:
650.82
FFE: 651.15
GFE: 649.69
STOOP:650.82
FFE: 651.82
GFE: 650.35
STOOP:651.49
FFE: 652.48
GFE: 651.02
STOOP:
652.15
648.53FFE: 648.85
GFE: 647.93
FFE: 648.85
GFE: 647.93
FFE: 648.18
GFE: 647.26
FFE: 647.52
GFE: 646.60
FFE: 647.52
GFE: 646.60
FFE: 646.85
GFE: 645.93644.39644.55644.68644.85645.21645.37645.73645.89646.28646.46647.06646.87FFE: 652.25
GFE: 650.79
FFE: 651.59
GFE: 650.12
FFE: 650.25
GFE: 648.79
FFE: 649.59
GFE: 648.12
FFE: 646.25
GFE: 644.79
FFE: 644.92
GFE: 643.45 644.96645.23FFE: 652.75GFE: 651.29FFE: 652.09GFE: 650.62FFE: 651.42GFE: 649.95FFE: 650.75GFE: 649.29FFE: 650.08GFE: 648.62FFE: 648.75GFE: 647.29 651.57651.81652.59652.35FFE: 648.25
GFE: 646.79647.58FFE: 647.59
GFE: 646.12646.67646.93FFE: 646.92
GFE: 645.45645.81646.08FFE: 651.33
GFE: 650.41
FFE: 651.33
GFE: 650.41
FFE: 650.66
GFE: 649.74648.84649.02649.43649.62650.21650.02FFE: 650.00
GFE: 649.08
FFE: 649.42GFE: 647.95648.45648.70FFE: 655.61GFE: 654.69FFE: 654.94GFE: 654.02FFE: 654.28GFE: 653.36FFE: 652.94GFE: 652.02 FFE: 653.61GFE: 652.69
FFE: 645.61
GFE: 644.69
FFE: 645.61
GFE: 644.69
FFE: 646.28
GFE: 645.36
FFE: 646.94
GFE: 646.02
FFE: 647.61
GFE: 646.69
FFE: 646.24GFE: 645.32 FFE: 649.57GFE: 648.65 FFE: 650.24GFE: 649.32 FFE: 650.91GFE: 649.99 FFE: 651.57GFE: 650.65FFE: 652.32GFE: 651.40 FFE: 653.65GFE: 652.73 FFE: 654.32GFE: 653.40 FFE: 654.99GFE: 654.07 FFE: 655.65GFE: 654.73FFE: 652.99 FFE: 647.57GFE: 646.65FFE: 646.91GFE: 645.99 FFE: 648.91GFE: 647.99
FFE: 649.28
GFE: 648.36
FFE: 649.95
GFE: 649.03
FFE: 650.61
GFE: 649.69
FFE: 651.28
GFE: 650.36
648.69648.50648.48648.30648.15647.97STOOP:645.28 STOOP:645.28
STOOP:645.95 STOOP:
646.61 STOOP:647.28 STOOP:648.95
STOOP:649.62 STOOP:
650.28
STOOP:
650.955.50%STOOP:644.59 STOOP:645.92
STOOP:
646.59 STOOP:647.26 STOOP:647.92 STOOP:649.26
STOOP:649.92 STOOP:
651.26
STOOP:651.92
STOOP:645.91 STOOP:646.58 STOOP:647.24 STOOP:649.24 STOOP:649.91 STOOP:650.58 STOOP:651.24
647.89648.58649.59649.90650.59651.60651.91648.90650.91TS: 646.52BS: 644.52 STOOP:648.42STOOP:651.99 STOOP:652.66STOOP:649.09 STOOP:649.75STOOP:653.32 STOOP:653.99STOOP:650.42 STOOP:651.09STOOP:654.66 STOOP:655.32STOOP:651.76 STOOP:652.42648.01648.26649.23649.48650.01650.25650.79651.03651.57651.81GFE: 652.07 654.98654.78654.34654.14653.70653.50653.06652.86652.70652.50STOOP:652.61 STOOP:653.28 STOOP:653.95 STOOP:654.61 STOOP:655.28-5.00%-5.01%6.09%-2.50%-2.50%-5.00%
-5.00%
-4.99%
-5.00%
-2.00%
-2.65%
-1.03%642.30644.77651.42652.50649.47646.72642.28644.67646.25648.74651.63652.53644.48644.75FFE: 655.05GFE: 652.50FFE: 655.05GFE: 652.50FFE: 655.72GFE: 653.17FFE: 657.05GFE: 655.59FFE: 655.72GFE: 653.71654.39654.48654.55654.63654.82654.91655.10655.18656.47656.56FFE: 656.39GFE: 653.84GFE: 654.38FFE: 656.39GFE: 654.92655.37655.46655.65655.73655.92656.01FFE: 656.39FFE: 657.05GFE: 655.59656.28656.20STOOP:656.72STOOP:656.72STOOP:656.06STOOP:656.06STOOP:656.06STOOP:655.39STOOP:655.39STOOP:654.72STOOP:654.72FFE: 654
.91GFE: 652.36FFE: 654.91GFE: 652.36FFE: 654.91GFE: 652.36FFE: 654.91GFE: 652.36FFE: 654.91GFE: 652.36653.83653.90653.95654.02654.17654.24654.39654.46654.20654.15FFE: 655.57GFE: 653.03GFE: 653.03FFE: 654.91GFE: 652.36654.61654.68654.68654.63654.52654.47FFE: 655.57FFE: 654.91GFE: 652.36654.31654.36STOOP:654.58STOOP:654.58STOOP:654.58STOOP:655.24STOOP:655.24STOOP:654.58STOOP:654.58STOOP:654.58STOOP:654.58FFE: 653
.12GFE: 650.57FFE: 653.12GFE: 650
.57FFE: 653.12GFE: 650.57FFE: 653
.78GFE: 651.78FFE: 653.12GFE: 651
.11652.27652.27652.27652.27652.29652.34652.46652.51653.22653.26FFE: 653.12GFE: 651
.11GFE: 651.24FFE: 653.78GFE: 651.24652.62652.67652.79652.84652.95652.99FFE: 653
.78FFE: 653
.78GFE: 651
.78653.13653.08STOOP:653.45STOOP:653.45STOOP:653.45STOOP:653.45STOOP:652.79STOOP:652.79STOOP:652.79STOOP:652.79STOOP:652.79FFE: 657.24FFE: 656
.57FFE: 653.90FFE: 656.57656.36656.25656.17656.07655.85655.75653.40653.20FFE: 655
.90FFE: 655.24655.53655.43655.21655.10654.73654.53FFE: 655.90FFE: 654.57653.86654.07STOOP:653.57STOOP:654.24STOOP:654.91STOOP:655.57STOOP:655.57STOOP:656.24STOOP:656.24STOOP:656.91FFE: 657.78FFE: 657.78FFE: 657.78FFE: 657.78STOOP:657.45STOOP:657.45STOOP:657.45STOOP:657.45FFE: 657
.78FFE: 657.78657.03657.06STOOP:657.45STOOP:657.45656.93656.96657.03657.13657.16657.23657.26657.33657.36657.38657.41GFE: 655.23GFE: 654.57GFE: 654
.57GFE: 653.90GFE: 653.36GFE: 652
.69GFE: 652.57GFE: 651.90GFE: 655.78GFE: 655.78GFE: 655.78GFE: 656.32GFE: 656.32GFE: 656.32656.31657.41654.40652.01652.42651.81650.76650.30652.37654.86655.87656.23Elevations TableNumber123456789Minimum Elevation-9.000-6.000-4.000-2.0000.0002.0004.0006.0008.000Maximum Elevation-6.000-4.000-2.0000.0002.0004.0006.0008.00012.000Color7/26/2023 11:08 AM JFLEHAN P:\CLT\_2020\1020338\CAD\CIVIL\1020338-X-GRADE.DWGPN1020338 | 8.10.2023 | TRIPOINT6500 SOUTH BLVD ▪ CHARLOTTE, NC ▪ CUT/FILLSCALE:1" = 40'

APPENDIX C
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
﴿(﴾﴾650 South
BLVD NaameADs 5 6 Li gmAmaS nd5VrFD D
%hDV5Fm m5ALAsNCL DVDA pol1b SDia(%﴾yO)yO)﴾O)//yO)2yO)﴾O)3 ﴾
O)9SLaD%4dLAs6 5iVol1rLaa 3y%yO)﴾O)3 (y/%yO)﴾O)3 ﴾
/PiLsmAe9DiVm ﴿y/yO)﴾O)3 ﴿y3yO)﴾O)3 ﴾
3 PiLsmAey9SLaDO)4d ﴿y(yO)﴾O)3 EyO)yO)﴾O)3 ﴾
(6LAm Lil16DGDi ﴿yO)3yO)﴾O)3 EyO)/yO)﴾O)3 ﴾
﴿6 5iV6DGDi EyO)﴿yO)﴾O)3 %﴾yO)/yO)﴾O)3 ﴾
8 w5Ls60CeiLsD %﴾yO)3yO)﴾O)3 %y%yO)﴾O)(﴾
E d0iCLAsP0 Di %﴾yO)3yO)﴾O)3 %O)y(yO)﴾O)3 ﴾
2 9L7mAe %yO)yO)﴾O)(O)y%3yO)﴾O)(﴾
%﴾bRRam Dw5LsvVri57DVDA a ﴿y/yO)﴾O)3 2yO)8yO)﴾O)3 ﴾
%%fL DiwDVLmAmAe %O)y﴿yO)﴾O)3 O)yO)EyO)﴾O)(﴾
%O)gFL G5iIy6msDGLFI O)y%8yO)﴾O)(8yO)yO)﴾O)(﴾
4Wr5i DsRi5Vkmxi5a5R 9i5MDx 5AEy%%yO)﴾O)/9LeD%5RO)
﴿(﴾﴾650 South
BLVD
%hDV5Fm m5ALAsNCL DVDA pol1b SDia(
O)9SLaD%4dLAs6 5iVol1rLaa
/PiLsmAe9DiVm
3 PiLsmAey9SLaDO)4d
(6LAm Lil16DGDi
﴿6 5iV6DGDi
8 w5Ls60CeiLsD
E d0iCLAsP0 Di
2 9L7mAe
%﴾bRRam Dw5LsvVri57DVDA a
%%fL DiwDVLmAmAe
%O)gFL G5iIy6msDGLFI
4Wr5i DsRi5Vkmxi5a5R 9i5MDx 5AEy%%yO)﴾O)/9LeDO)5RO)

APPENDIX D
HISTORICAL DATA SUMMARY

Table 1ASummary of Organic Constituent Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDHL-1 HL-2 HL-3 HL-4 HL-5 HL-6 HL-7 HL-8 HL-9 HL-10 HL-11 HL-12 HL-13 HL-14Depth (ft bgs)Sample DateUnitsTPH (8015C)DRO (C10-C28)<3.6 <3.8 <3.7 <4.14.1 J 4.5 J<3.94.9 J<3.81,3104.3 J<3.7 <3.710.2 ---- --100PCBs (8082A)ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ---- ----VOCs (8260D)AcetoneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.35NA NA NA NA2512,000 140,000--2-Butanone (MEK)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.031 NA NA NA NA175,500 40,000--n-ButylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.12NA NA NA NA4.5780 12,000--sec-ButylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0028 NA NA NA NA4.11,600 23,000--ChloroformNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0039 NA NA NA NA0.390.340 1.5--1,1-DichloroethaneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.0035 JNA NA NA NA0.0343.8 17--cis-1,2-DichloretheneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0022 NA NA NA NA0.4131 470--EthylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.042NA NA NA NA13627--Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0022 NA NA NA NA2.3410 2,100--p-IsopropyltolueneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0031 NA NA NA NANENE NE--Methylene ChlorideNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.017 NA NA NA NA0.02558 650--Methyl-tert-butyl etherNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0024 NA NA NA NA0.0949 220--NaphthaleneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.052NA NA NA NA0.392.1 8.8--n-PropylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0023 NA NA NA NA2.3780.0 5,100.0--TetrachloroetheneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.14NA NA NA NA0.006317 82--TolueneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.039NA NA NA NA8.3990 9,700--TrichloroetheneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.012NA NA NA NA0.0210.87 4--1,2,4-TrimethylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.38NA NA NA NA1263 430--1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.17NA NA NA NA1156 320--Xylene (Total)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.25NA NA NA NA9.9120 530--SVOCs (8270E)Di-n-butylphthalateNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.31 JNA NA NA NA351,300 16,000--bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.15 NA NA NA NA1439 160--1-MethylnaphthaleneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.13 NA NA NA NA0.1118 73--2-MethylnaphthaleneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.15 NA NA NA NA3.148 600--PhenanthreneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.12 NA NA NA NANENE NE--Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated July 2022. 2) DEQ Division of Waste Management Underground Storage Tank (UST) Section Action Level (December 2013).Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit. EPA laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the IHSB Protection of Groundwater PSRG or UST Action Level. VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; TPH = total petroleum hydrocarbons; DRO = diesel range organics NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NE = no established standard; BDL = below laboratory method detection limits; OWS = oil/water separatorJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. mg/kgFormer In-Ground Hydraulic Lifts8-108/3/2021Protection of Groundwater(1)Screening Criteria Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Action Level (2)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Soil/Data Tables_JRL9/23/2022Table 1A (Page 1 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PCPre-Excavation Data
Table 1ASummary of Organic Constituent Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDHL-15 HL-16 HL-17 HL-18 HL-19 HL-20 HL-21 HL-22 HL-24Depth (ft bgs)Sample Date8/4/2021UnitsTPH (8015C)DRO (C10-C28)<3.7 <3.72,780 338<4.1413<4.2107 874 896<4.7---- --100PCBs (8082A)ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL--------VOCs (8260D)AcetoneNA NA <0.035 <0.051 NA <0.057 NA <0.0440.18 0.20NA2512,000 140,000--2-Butanone (MEK)NA NA <0.026 <0.038 NA <0.042 NA <0.0330.13 0.15NA175,500 40,000--n-ButylbenzeneNA NA0.49<0.0037 NA0.0056 JNA <0.0027 <0.0029 <0.0027 NA4.5780 12,000--sec-ButylbenzeneNA NA0.32 0.0052 JNA <0.0039 NA <0.0030 <0.0027 <0.0025 NA4.11,600 23,000--ChloroformNA NA <0.0033 <0.0048 NA <0.0054 NA0.0056 J<0.0037 <0.0034 NA0.390.340 1.5--1,1-DichloroethaneNA NA <0.0023 <0.0033 NA <0.0036 NA <0.0028 <0.0025 <0.0023 NA0.0343.8 17--cis-1,2-DichloretheneNA NA0.0077 0.046NA <0.0030 NA0.0081<0.0021 <0.0019 NA0.4131 470--EthylbenzeneNA NA0.032<0.0037 NA0.036NA <0.0032 <0.0028 <0.0026 NA13627--Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)NA NA0.063<0.0027 NA <0.0030 NA <0.0023 <0.0021 <0.0019 NA2.3410 2,100--p-IsopropyltolueneNA NA0.60<0.0039 NA <0.0043 NA <0.0033 <0.0030 <0.0028 NANENE NE--Methylene ChlorideNA NA <0.015 <0.022 NA <0.024 NA <0.019 <0.17 <0.015 NA0.02558 650--Methyl-tert-butyl etherNA NA <0.0021 <0.0030 NA <0.0033 NA <0.0025 <0.0023 <0.0021 NA0.0949 220--NaphthaleneNA NA0.11<0.0042 NA0.55NA0.015<0.00320.0055 JNA0.392.1 8.8--n-PropylbenzeneNA NA0.19<0.0028 NA <0.0031 NA <0.0024 <0.0022 <0.0020 NA2.3780.05,100.0--TetrachloroetheneNA NA0.014<0.0025 NA0.93NA0.018 0.085 0.082NA0.00631782--TolueneNA NA0.012 0.0082NA0.026NA0.012 0.0050 J 0.0043 JNA8.39909,700--TrichloroetheneNA NA <0.0014 <0.0020 NA0.041NA <0.0018 <0.0016 <0.0015 NA0.0210.874--1,2,4-TrimethylbenzeneNA NA1.2<0.0022 NA0.73NA0.022 0.025 0.024NA1263430--1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneNA NA0.51<0.0027 NA <0.0030 NA <0.00230.012<0.0019 NA1156320--Xylene (Total)NA NA0.014<0.0045 NA0.22NA0.0061 J 0.0094 J 0.0062 JNA9.9120530--SVOCs (8270E)Di-n-butylphthalateNA NA0.35 J 0.33 JNA0.42 JNA <0.130.37 J<0.13 NA351,30016,000--bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateNA NA0.27 J<0.18 NA <0.19 NA <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 NA1439160--1-MethylnaphthaleneNA NA0.18 J<0.16 NA <0.17 NA <0.14 <0.13 <0.13 NA0.111873--2-MethylnaphthaleneNA NA0.25 J<0.18 NA <0.19 NA <0.16 <0.15 <0.15 NA3.148600--PhenanthreneNA NA0.14 J<0.15 NA <0.16 NA <0.13 <0.13 <0.12 NANENENE--Notes:1)North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated July 2022.2)DEQ Division of Waste Management Underground Storage Tank (UST) Section Action Level (December 2013).Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit. EPA laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG or UST Action Level.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; TPH = total petroleum hydrocarbons; DRO = diesel range organicsNA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NE = no established standard; BDL = below laboratory method detection limits; OWS = oil/water separatorJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.Former In-Ground Hydraulic LiftsResidential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Action Level (2)HL-23 / SB-DUP-18-108/3/2021Protection of Groundwater(1)Screening Criteria mg/kghttps://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Soil/Data Tables_JRL9/23/2022Table 1A (Page 2 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PCPre-Excavation Data
Table 1ASummary of Organic Constituent Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSuspect UST Floor Drain Former USTOWSSample IDSB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-5 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8Depth (ft bgs)8-10 2-4 8-10 2-4 2-4 2-4 8-10Sample Date8/2/2021 8/3/2021 8/2/2021 8/3/2021 8/2/2021 8/2/2021 8/2/2021UnitsTPH (8015C)DRO (C10-C28)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA---- --100PCBs (8082A)NANANANANANANANANA--------VOCs (8260D)Acetone<0.0342 <0.0400 <0.0367 <0.0353 <0.030 <0.02830.0793 J<0.0347 <0.0342512,000 140,000--2-Butanone (MEK)<0.026 <0.030 <0.027 <0.026 <0.022 <0.021 <0.032 <0.026 <0.025175,500 40,000--n-Butylbenzene<0.0025 <0.0029 <0.0027 <0.0026 <0.0022 <0.0021 <0.0032 <0.0026 <0.00254.5780 12,000--sec-Butylbenzene<0.0023 <0.0027 <0.0025 <0.0024 <0.0021 <0.0019 <0.0030 <0.0024 <0.00234.11,600 23,000--Chloroform<0.0032 <0.0038 <0.0035 <0.0033 <0.0028 <0.0027 <0.0041 <0.0033 <0.00320.390.340 1.5--1,1-Dichloroethane<0.0022 <0.0026 <0.0024 <0.0023 <0.0019 <0.0018 <0.0028 <0.0022 <0.00220.0343.8 17--cis-1,2-Dichlorethene<0.0008 <0.0021 <0.0020 <0.0019 <0.0016 <0.00150.0141<0.0018 <0.00180.4131 470--Ethylbenzene<0.0025 <0.0029 <0.0027 <0.0026 <0.0022 <0.0021 <0.0031 <0.0025 <0.002513627--Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)<0.0018 <0.0021 <0.0019 <0.0019 <0.0016 <0.0015 <0.0023 <0.0018 <0.00182.3410 2,100--p-Isopropyltoluene<0.0026 <0.0031 <0.0028 <0.0027 <0.0023 <0.0022 <0.0033 <0.00270.0167 NENE NE--Methylene Chloride<0.0146 <0.0171 <0.0157 <0.0151 <0.0128 <0.01210.0748 0.0596 0.05960.02558 650--Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.002.0 <0.0023 <0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0017 <0.0016 <0.0025 <0.00200.0032 J 0.0949 220--Naphthalene<0.0028 <0.0033 <0.0030 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.00230.0158<0.0028 <0.00280.392.1 8.8--n-Propylbenzene<0.0019 <0.0022 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0017 <0.0016 <0.0024 <0.0019 <0.00192.3780.0 5,100.0--Tetrachloroethene<0.00170.0183<0.0018 <0.0017 <0.0015 <0.00140.114 0.473<0.00170.006317 82--Toluene<0.0015 <0.0018 <0.0016 <0.0016 <0.0013 <0.00130.0209<0.0015 <0.00158.3990 9,700--Trichloroethene<0.00140.0075<0.0015 <0.0014 <0.0012 <0.00110.0116 0.0058<0.00140.0210.87 4--1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene<0.0015<0.0017 <0.0016 <0.0015 <0.0013 <0.00120.084.9<0.0015 <0.00141263430--1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.0018 <0.0021 <0.0019 <0.0018 <0.0016 <0.00150.0494<0.0018 <0.00181156 320--Xylene (Total)<0.0015 <0.0035 <0.0039 <0.0031 <0.0027 <0.00250.121<0.0031 <0.00309.9120 530--SVOCs (8270E)Di-n-butylphthalate<0.14 <0.13 <0.14 <0.13 <0.13 <0.12 <0.13 <0.67 <0.13351,30016,000--bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate<0.17 <0.15 <0.16 <0.15 <0.15 <0.14 <0.15 <0.78 <0.151439160--1-Methylnaphthalene<0.15 <0.14 <0.14 <0.14 <0.13 <0.13 <0.14 <0.70 <0.130.111873--2-Methylnaphthalene<0.17 <0.15 <0.16 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.16 <0.80 <0.153.148600--Phenanthrene<0.14 <0.13 <0.13 <0.13 <0.12 <0.12 <0.13 <0.65 <0.12NENENE--Notes:1)North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated July 2022.2)DEQ Division of Waste Management Underground Storage Tank (UST) Section Action Level (December 2013).Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit. EPA laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG or UST Action Level.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; TPH = total petroleum hydrocarbons; DRO = diesel range organicsNA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NE = no established standard; BDL = below laboratory method detection limits; OWS = oil/water separatorJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.Former Wash-Bay Floor Drains Trench Drain - Building 4Action Level (2)Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Protection of Groundwater(1)mg/kgScreening Criteria SB-4 / SB-DUP-22-48/3/2021https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Soil/Data Tables_JRL9/23/2022Table 1A (Page 3 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PCPre-Excavation Data
Table 1BSummary of Metals Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDHL-1 HL-2 HL-3 HL-4 HL-5 HL-6 HL-7 HL-8 HL-9 HL-10 HL-11 HL-12 HL-13 HL-14Depth (ft bgs)Sample DateRange MeanUnitsMetals (6020B/7471B/7199)ArsenicNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.836 JNA NA NA NA5.8 0.68 3.01.0 - 18 4.8BariumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA22.2NA NA NA NA580 3,100 47,00050-1,000 356CadmiumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0958 NA NA NA NA3 14 2001.0 - 10 4.3Chromium (Total)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA7.31NA NA NA NANE-- --7.0 - 300 65Hexavalent ChromiumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.286 NA NA NA NA3.8 0.31 6.5NS NSTrivalent ChromiumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA7.31NA NA NA NA360,000 23,000 350,000NS NSLeadNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA4.61NA NA NA NA270 400 800ND - 50 16MercuryNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0202 NA NA NA NANE 4.7 700.03 - 0.52 0.121SeleniumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.350 JNA NA NA NA2.1 78 1,200<0.1 - 0.8 0.42SilverNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0969 NA NA NA NA3.4 78 1,200ND - 5.0 NSNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated July 2022.2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Drugan and Chekiri, 2005. Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils.Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit.EPA laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses.Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Residential PSRG and background concentrations.Underlined values indicate compound exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRGs and background concentrations.NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NS = not specified; ND = not detected; OWS = oil/water separator; UST - underground storage tankJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.B = Analyte was detected in the associated method blank.ML = Matrix spike recovery and/or matrix spike duplicate recovery was below laboratory control limits. Result may be biased low.R1 = RPD value was outside control limits.Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)mg/kgScreening Criteria 8/3/20218-10Former In-Ground Hydraulic Liftsmg/kgResidential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Background Metals (2)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Soil/Data Tables_JRL9/23/2022Table 1B (Page 1 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PCPre-Excavation Data
Table 1BSummary of Metals Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDHL-15 HL-16 HL-17 HL-18 HL-19 HL-20 HL-21 HL-22 HL-24Depth (ft bgs)Sample Date8/4/2021 Range MeanUnitsMetals (6020B/7471B/7199)ArsenicNA NA1.42 2.77NA2.28NA1.89 0.621 J 1.02 JNA5.8 0.68 3.01.0 - 18 4.8BariumNA NA43.1 94.1NA84.0NA114 16.4 27.9NA580 3,100 47,00050-1,000 356CadmiumNA NA <0.0997 <0.107 NA0.146 JNA <0.111 <0.0966 <0.0969 NA3 14 2001.0 - 10 4.3Chromium (Total)NA NA15.5 40.8NA47.8NA34.3 27.1 19.2NANE-- --7.0 - 300 65Hexavalent ChromiumNA NA <0.2970.487 JNA <0.366 NA <0.3320.603 J<0.289 NA3.8 0.31 6.5NS NSTrivalent ChromiumNA NA15.5 40.31NA47.8NA34.3 26.49 19.2NA360000 23,000 350,000NS NSLeadNA NA8.98 7.09NA11.4NA7.66 9.10 7.53NA270 400 800ND - 50 16MercuryNA NA <0.0210 <0.0224 NA <0.0259 NA <0.0234 <0.02030.0420 JNANE 4.7 700.03 - 0.52 0.121SeleniumNA NA0.580 J 2.98 JNA1.02 JNA1.33 J<0.2030.668 JNA2.1 78 1,200<0.1 - 0.8 0.42SilverNA NA <0.101 <0.108 NA <0.124 NA <0.113 <0.0977 <0.0980 NA3.4 78 1,200ND - 5.0 NSNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated July 2022. 2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Drugan and Chekiri, 2005. Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils. Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit. EPA laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Residential PSRG and background concentrations. Underlined values indicate compound exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRGs and background concentrations.NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NS = not specified; ND = not detected; OWS = oil/water separator; UST - underground storage tankJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. B = Analyte was detected in the associated method blank.ML = Matrix spike recovery and/or matrix spike duplicate recovery was below laboratory control limits. Result may be biased low.R1 = RPD value was outside control limits. Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Screening Criteria HL-23 / SB-DUP-1Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Background Metals (2)8-10mg/kgmg/kgFormer In-Ground Hydraulic Lifts8/3/2021https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Soil/Data Tables_JRL9/23/2022Table 1B (Page 2 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PCPre-Excavation Data
Table 1BSummary of Metals Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSuspected USTFloor Drain Former USTOWSSample IDSB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-5 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8 BG-1 BG-2 BG-3Depth (ft bgs)8-10 2-4 8-10 2-4 2-4 2-4 8-10Sample Date8/2/2021 8/3/2021 8/2/2021 8/3/2021 8/2/2021 8/2/2021 8/2/2021Range MeanUnitsMetals by 6020B/7471B/7199Arsenic0.567 B,J 0.536 B,J 0.210 B,J 0.324 B,J 0.403 B,J,ML 0.454 B,J 0.541 B,J 0.456 B,J 0.932 B,J 0.910 B,J 0.813 B,J 0.750 B,J 5.8 0.68 3.01.0 - 18 4.8Barium301 55.2 11.8 10.1 10.8 5.82 149 142 38.0 81.6 123 59.7 580 3,100 47,00050-1,000 356Cadmium<0.122 <0.104 <0.103 <0.0990 <0.0997 <0.0975 <0.104 <0.102 <0.101 <0.09710.107 J<0.09223 14 2001.0 - 10 4.3Chromium (Total)28.6 17.5 2.45 J 9.44 19.3 14.8 14.7 16.9 12.9 21.2 11.5 0.989 J NE-- --7.0 - 300 65Hexavalent Chromium0.736 J 0.875 J<0.3070.865 J 1.34 1.35 0.715 J 0.882 J<0.302 <0.290 <0.282 <0.2753.8 0.31 6.5NS NSTrivalent Chromium27.86 16.63 2.45 J 8.58 17.96 13.15 13.99 16.02 12.9 21.2 11.5 0.989 J 360000 23,000 350,000NS NSLead4.87 5.99 2.90 B 4.39 6.12 5.51 1.99 B,J 3.00 B 5.32 12.6 11.5 7.38 270 400 800ND - 50 16Mercury<0.0257 <0.0219 <0.0482 <0.0463 <0.0210 ML,R1 <0.0456 <0.0219 <0.02150.0260 J 0.0226 J<0.0199 <0.0194NE 4.7 700.03 - 0.52 0.121Selenium0.305 J<0.219 <0.217 <0.208 <0.210 <0.205 <0.219 <0.2150.242 J 0.543 J 0.379 J 0.408 J 2.1 78 1,200<0.1 - 0.8 0.42Silver<0.123 <0.609 <0.104 <0.100 <0.101 <0.0986 <0.105 <0.103 <0.102 <0.0982 <0.0958 <0.09333.4 78 1,200ND - 5.0 NSNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated July 2022. 2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Drugan and Chekiri, 2005. Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils. Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit. EPA laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Residential PSRG and background concentrations. Underlined values indicate compound exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRGs and background concentrations.NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NS = not specified; ND = not detected; OWS = oil/water separator; UST - underground storage tankJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. B = Analyte was detected in the associated method blank.ML = Matrix spike recovery and/or matrix spike duplicate recovery was below laboratory control limits. Result may be biased low.R1 = RPD value was outside control limits. 2-40-28/3/2021Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Screening Criteria Former Wash-Bay Floor Drains Trench Drain - Building 4 Background8/2/2021SB-4 / SB-DUP-2mg/kgmg/kgResidential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Background Metals (2)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Soil/Data Tables_JRL9/23/2022Table 1B (Page 3 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PCPre-Excavation Data
Table 1CSummary of Soil Analytical Data Harrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002Building IDLocationFormer Wash BaySample IDMP-3 MP-18A MP-18B MP-18C MP-18DDepth (ft bgs)0-1 1-2Sample DateRange Range MeanUnitsVOCs (8260D)Acetone<0.0380.10 J C7 0.097 J C7<0.037 <0.040 <0.040 <0.034 <0.0422514,000 210,000-- -- --cis-1,2-Dichlorethene<0.0020 <0.0026 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0018 <0.00220.4131 470-- -- --Methylene Chloride<0.016 <0.0210.036 C7<0.016 <0.017 <0.017 <0.015 <0.0180.02558 650-- -- --Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.0022 <0.00290.029 C7<0.0021 <0.0023 <0.0023 <0.0020 <0.00240.0949 220-- -- --Naphthalene<0.0031 <0.0040 <0.0031 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.00330.013<0.00340.392.1 8.8-- -- --Tetrachloroethene<0.00190.65 0.16 0.21 0.53 0.18 0.022 0.0730.006317 82-- -- --Toluene<0.00170.012 0.0050 J<0.0016 <0.0018 <0.0018 <0.0015 <0.00188.3990 9,700-- -- --Trichloroethene<0.0015 <0.0020 <0.0015 <0.0015 <0.0016 <0.0016 <0.0014 <0.00170.0210.87 4-- -- --1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene<0.00160.035 0.0071<0.0016 <0.0017 <0.00170.0094<0.00181263 370-- -- --1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.00200.021 0.0042 J<0.0019 <0.0021 <0.00210.0030 J<0.00221156 320-- -- --m&p-Xylene<0.00410.013 J 0.0061 J<0.0039 <0.0043 <0.0043 <0.0037 <0.00449.8120 500-- -- --o-Xylene<0.00260.0073 J 0.0031 J<0.0025 <0.0028 <0.0027 <0.0024 <0.00299.8140 590-- -- --Xylene (Total)<0.00340.021 0.0092 J<0.0033 <0.0036 <0.0035 <0.0031 <0.00379.9120 530-- -- --SVOCs (8270E)NAALL BDLNANANANANANA ------------Metals by 6020B/7471B/7199ArsenicNA0.93NA NA NA NA NA NA5.8 0.68 3.0 0.75 - 0.911.0 - 18 4.8BariumNA116NA NA NA NA NA NA580 3,100 47,000 59.7 - 12350-1,000 356CadmiumNA0.063 JNA NA NA NA NA NA3 1.4 20 ND - 0.107 J1.0 - 10 4.3Chromium (Total)NA26.0NA NA NA NA NA NANE NE NE 0.989 J - 21.27.0 - 300 65Hexavalent ChromiumNA1.47NA NA NA NA NA NA3.8 0.31 6.5 NDNS NSTrivalent ChromiumNA24.5NA NA NA NA NA NA360,000 23,000 350,000 0.989 - 21.2NS NSLeadNA7.3NA NA NA NA NA NA270.0 400 800 7.38 - 12.6ND - 50 16MercuryNA <0.0098 NA NA NA NA NA NANE 4.7 70 ND - 0.0226 J0.03 - 0.52 0.121SeleniumNA0.25 JNA NA NA NA NA NA2.1 78 1,200 0.379 - 0.543<0.1 - 0.8 0.42SilverNA0.23 JNA NA NA NA NA NA3.4 78 1,200 NDND - 5.0 NSNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2022.3) Site specific background metals collected H&H during Phase II Environmental Site Assessment activities on 8/21/2021.2)Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Drugan and Chekiri, 2005. Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils.Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicableNE = not established; BDL = below laboratory method detection limits; AST = aboveground storage tankC7 = Compound is a possible laboratory contaminant.J = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.mg/kg0-1 / DUP-01MP-185/20/20220-1Site Specific Background Metals (2)Maintenance BayBuilding 3Screening Criteria Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)BackgroundMetals (3)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Additional Assessment/Report/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Data Tables (combined).xlsx7/15/2022Table 1C (Page 1 of 2) Hart & Hickman, PCPre-Excavation Data
Table 1CSummary of Soil Analytical Data Harrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002Building IDLocationSample IDMP-30 MP-30A MP-30B MP-30C MP-30D MP-43A MP-43B MP-43C MP-43DDepth (ft bgs)0-1 0-1 0-1 0-1 0-1 1-2 2-3 1-2 0-1 1-2 1-2Sample DateRange Range MeanUnitsVOCs (8260D)Acetone0.041 J C7<0.050 <0.052 <0.040 <0.037 <0.040 <0.044 <0.052 <0.045 <0.039 <0.0632514,000 210,000-- -- --cis-1,2-Dichlorethene<0.0022 <0.0027 <0.0028 <0.0021 <0.00200.0033 J 0.0066 J<0.0028 <0.0024 <0.0021 <0.00330.4131 470-- -- --Methylene Chloride<0.017 <0.0220.064 C7<0.017 <0.016 <0.017 <0.019 <0.022 <0.019 <0.017 <0.0270.02558 650-- -- --Methyl-tert-butyl ether0.019 C7<0.0029 <0.0030 <0.0023 <0.00210.0043 J<0.0025 <0.0030 <0.0026 <0.0023 <0.00370.0949 220-- -- --Naphthalene<0.0033 <0.0041 <0.0043 <0.0032 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0036 <0.0042 <0.0036 <0.0032 <0.00510.392.1 8.8-- -- --Tetrachloroethene<0.0020 <0.0025 <0.0026 <0.0020 <0.00180.14<0.0021 <0.00251.3 0.73<0.00310.006317 82-- -- --Toluene<0.0018 <0.0022 <0.0023 <0.0018 <0.0016 <0.0018 <0.0019 <0.0023 <0.0020 <0.0017 <0.00288.3990 9,700-- -- --Trichloroethene<0.0016 <0.0020 <0.0021 <0.0016 <0.00150.0071<0.0017 <0.00210.0310.020<0.00250.0210.87 4-- -- --1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene<0.0017 <0.0022 <0.0022 <0.0017 <0.0016 <0.0017 <0.0019 <0.0022 <0.0019 <0.0017 <0.00271263 370-- -- --1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.0021 <0.0026 <0.0027 <0.0021 <0.0019 <0.0021 <0.0023 <0.0027 <0.0023 <0.0020 <0.00331156 320-- -- --m&p-Xylene<0.0043 <0.0054 <0.0056 <0.0042 <0.0039 <0.0043 <0.0046 <0.0055 <0.0047 <0.0042 <0.00679.8120 500-- -- --o-Xylene<0.0028 <0.0035 <0.0036 <0.0027 <0.0025 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0036 <0.0031 <0.0027 <0.00439.8140 590-- -- --Xylene (Total)<0.0036 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0035 <0.0033 <0.0036 <0.0039 <0.0046 <0.0040 <0.0035 <0.00569.9120 530-- -- --SVOCs (8270E)NANANANANA ALL BDL NANANANANA------------Metals by 6020B/7471B/7199ArsenicNA NA NA NA NA0.99NA NA NA NA NA5.8 0.68 3.0 0.75 - 0.911.0 - 18 4.8BariumNA NA NA NA NA227NA NA NA NA NA580 3,100 47,000 59.7 - 12350-1,000 356CadmiumNA NA NA NA NA0.1NA NA NA NA NA3 1.4 20 ND - 0.107 J1.0 - 10 4.3Chromium (Total)NA NA NA NA NA33.3NA NA NA NA NANE NE NE 0.989 J - 21.27.0 - 300 65Hexavalent ChromiumNA NA NA NA NA1.27NA NA NA NA NA3.8 0.31 6.5 NDNS NSTrivalent ChromiumNA NA NA NA NA32.03NA NA NA NA NA360,000 23,000 350,000 0.989 - 21.2NS NSLeadNA NA NA NA NA11.2NA NA NA NA NA270.0 400 800 7.38 - 12.6ND - 50 16MercuryNA NA NA NA NA <0.0087 NA NA NA NA NANE 4.7 70 ND - 0.0226 J0.03 - 0.52 0.121SeleniumNA NA NA NA NA0.23 JNA NA NA NA NA2.1 78 1,200 0.379 - 0.543<0.1 - 0.8 0.42SilverNA NA NA NA NA0.17 JNA NA NA NA NA3.4 78 1,200 NDND - 5.0 NSNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2022.3) Site specific background metals collected H&H during Phase II Environmental Site Assessment activities on 8/21/2021.2)Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Drugan and Chekiri, 2005. Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils.Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicableNE = not established; BDL = below laboratory method detection limits; AST = aboveground storage tankC7 = Compound is a possible laboratory contaminant.J = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.Site Specific Background Metals (2)mg/kg5/23/2022Waste Oil AST Storage AreaBuilding 4Screening Criteria Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)BackgroundMetals (3)Trench Drain MP-435/20/2022 5/23/2022https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Additional Assessment/Report/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Data Tables (combined).xlsx7/15/2022Table 1C (Page 2 of 2) Hart & Hickman, PCPre-Excavation Data
Table 2Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data Harrelson FordCharlotte, North Carolina H&H Job No. ACO-002LocationDowngradient of OWSDowngradient of Undocumented USTsDowngradient of Building 4Sample IDTMW-1 TMW-3 TMW-4 TMW-5Sample DateUnitsVOCs (8260D)Acetone<5.1 <5.1 <5.120.2 J<5.1 <5.1 <5.1 <.16,000 NE NEBenzene0.39 J<0.34 <0.34 <0.34 <0.34 <0.34 <0.34 <0.341 1.6 6.92-Hexanone<0.48<0.48<0.48<0.48<0.48<0.480.83 J0.84 JNE1,6006,900Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.42<0.42<0.423.8<0.42<0.42<0.42<0.42204502,000Tetrachloroethene<0.29<0.29<0.29<0.29<0.29<0.292.42.50.71248SVOCs (8270E)ALL BDLALL BDLALL BDLALL BDLALL BDLALL BDLALL BDLALL BDL ------Metals (6020B/7470)Arsenic<1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.11.3 J 0.099 J 0.10 J10-- --Barium37.7 33.4 34.4 46.6 41.2 33.4 35.7 34.6700-- --Cadmium<0.11 <0.11 <0.11 <0.11 <0.11 <0.11 <0.60 <0.0602-- --Chromium (total)3.4 J 1.5 J 1.3 J<1.15.1 6.3 1.1 1.210-- --Lead<0.89 <0.89 <0.89 <0.891.7<0.890.13 J 0.13 J15-- --Mercury<0.12 <0.12 <0.12 <0.12 <0.12 <0.12 <0.12 <0.121 0.18 0.75Selenium<1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.40.27 J 0.27 J20-- --Silver<0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.070 <0.07020-- --Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) 15A NCAC 02L.0202 Groundwater Standards (2L Standards) dated April 20222) DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSLs) dated January 2022Compounds are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).With the exception of metals, only constituents detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L).Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.Bold values indicates compound concentration exceeds 2L Standard.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; -- = not applicable; BDL = below detection limitsUST = underground storage tank; OWS = oil/water separatorJ = Compound was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.µg/LAdjacent to Building 3TMW-6/ TMW-DUP6/30/2022UpgradientScreening Criteria TMW-2 / GW-DUP-12L Standards (1)Residential GWSLs (2) Non-Residential GWSLs (2)8/5/2021https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Additional Assessment/Report/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Data Tables (combined).xlsx7/15/2022Table 2 (Page 1 of 1) Hart & Hickman, PCPre-Excavation Data
Table 4Summary of Soil Gas Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002Evaluation AreaSample IDSG-1 SG-2 SG-3 SG-4 SG-5 SG-6 SG-7 SG-8Sample DateSample TypeUnitsVOCs (TO-15)1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane<0.78 <0.75 <0.78 <0.94 <0.81 <1.2 <391 <0.941.6 211,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane0.64 J 0.91 J 1.3 J 1.1 J 11.9<0.91 <304 <0.7335,000 440,0001,1-Dichloroethane<0.35 <0.33 <0.35 <0.42 <0.36 <0.52 <173 <0.42587701,2,4-Trimethylbenzene0.97 J 10.5 1.6 J 1.6 J 2.9 3.62,1508.4 420 5,3001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.613.0 0.78 J<0.730.89 J 2.1 J1,8105.0 420 5,3001,3-Dichlorobenzene11.8 6.6 7.9 5.6 J 16.5 12.1<535 <1.3NE NE2-Butanone (MEK)8.1 19.0 24.9 23.4 15.1 25.3<48964.0 35,000 440,0002-Hexanone<0.931.5 J<0.932.3 J 2.8 J 3.4 J<46517.2 210 2,6002-Propanol (Isopropanol)1.9 J<1.01.8 J<1.336.5 6.0 J<535 <1.31,400 18,0004-Ethyltoluene<0.994.6 J 3.2 J<1.2 <1.0 <1.51,390 J 1.8 J NE NE4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)3.5 J 3.0 J 2.4 J 2.5 J 3.4 J 4.1 J<3376.9 J 21,000 260,000Acetone37.5 26.6 51.3 34.6 89.5 133<1,900552 220,000 2,700,000Benzene0.79 J 1.619.14.6 2.8 10.3<12019.412 160Bromodichloromethane<0.505.30.65 J 0.87 J 0.78 J<0.75 <249 <0.602.5 33Bromomethane<0.320.61 J<0.32 <0.38 <0.33 <0.47 <1580.48 J 35 440Carbon disulfide68.4 42.3 101 29.7 52.3 113<136217 4,900 61,000Chlorobenzene<0.33 <0.31 <0.33 <0.39 <0.34 <0.49 <163 <0.39350 4,400Chloroethane<0.470.93 J 1.8 0.58 J<0.49 <0.71 <235 <0.5670,000 880,000Chloroform1.4 J87.612019.2 35.6<0.58 <1920.92 J 4.1 53Chloromethane<0.18 <0.17 <0.183.7 0.73 J 2.0<89.5 <0.21630 7,900Cyclohexane1.1 J 2.9 J 52.2 2.5 J 1.4 J 8.7 27,800 63.5 42,000 530,000Dibromochloromethane<1.1 <1.0 <1.1<1.3 <1.1 <1.6 <541 <1.3NE NEDichlorodifluoromethane2.5 3.3 2.3 2.7 63.1 2.1 J<198 <0.47700 8,800Ethanol18.4 7.6 29.5 2.7 J 38.7 46.4<62266.8 NE NEEthyl acetate1.5 J<0.260.67 J<0.33 <0.29 <0.41 <1381.3 J 490 6,100Ethylbenzene<0.6512.6 4.3 3.2 5.8 2.2 J2,0904.3 37 490Methylene Chloride<1.2 <1.210.4 2.3 J<1.3 <1.9 <623 <1.53,400 53,000Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.26 <0.25 <0.26 <0.32 <0.28 <0.40 <132651360 4,700Naphthalene<4.6 <4.4 <4.6<5.5 <4.8 <6.9<2,280 <5.52.8 36n-Heptane1.6 J 4.4 33.8<0.465.7 7.325,10027.4 2,800 35,000n-Hexane2.4 16.9 84.0 7.7 8.3 18.114,80074.1 4,900 61,000m&p-Xylene2.0 J 41.6 6.0 11.5 19.6 6.45,79015.4 700 8,800o-Xylene0.62 J 20.6 3.5 3.6 5.6 2.7 J4,5006.3 700 8,800Propylene7.3 46.9 787 47.7 21.9 275 1,070<0.3321,000 260,000Styrene<0.81 <0.781.4 J<0.97 <0.84 <1.2 <405 <0.977,000 88,000Tetrachloroethene33.1 23.7 1.7 20.5 2.6 2.1 J1,74016.3 280 3,500Tetrahydrofuran<0.38 <0.36 <0.38 <0.454.3<0.57 <189 <0.4514,000 180,000Toluene8.0 32.8 20.1 25.8 48.2 10.3 3,080 31.9 35,000 440,000Trichloroethene<0.41 <0.40 <0.410.58 J<0.43 <0.62 <206 <0.4914 180Trichlorofluoromethane1.3 J 1.2 J 0.96 J 1.2 J 2.5 J 1.6 J<2452.6 J NE NEVinyl chloride<0.18 <0.182.0<0.22 <0.19 <0.27 <91.2 <0.225.6 280Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated June 2021.Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).Laboratory analytical method is shown in parentheses.Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values exceed the Residential SGSL.Underlined values exceed the Non-Residential SGSL.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; NE = not establishedNote that due to dilution factor for sample SG-7, MDLs are above the DEQ DWM SGSLs for select compounds. J = Compound concentration was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.µg/m3µg/m3Screening Criteria Proposed Residential Building 8/5/2021Residential SGSLs (1)Non-Residential SGSLs (1)Exterior Soil Gashttps://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Ardent - ACO/ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard/Phase II Assessment/Tables/Data Tables.xlsxTable 4 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PCPre-Excavation Data
Table 4Summary of Soil Gas Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002Evaluation AreaSample IDSG-10 SG-11 SG-12 SG-13 SG-14 SG-15Sample DateSample TypeUnitsVOCs (TO-15)1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane<0.75 <0.75 <0.72 <0.75 <0.771.7 J<0.99 <0.671.6 211,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane0.70 J 0.66 J 0.74 J<0.58 <0.602.9 J<0.770.93 J 35,000 440,0001,1-Dichloroethane<0.33 <0.33 <0.32 <0.33 <0.340.46 J<0.44 <0.30587701,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1.7 J 1.6 J 0.74 J 1.1 J 10.7 12.0 12.8 7.3 420 5,3001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene0.65 J<0.59 <0.56 <0.594.8 5.4 3.0 2.2 420 5,3001,3-Dichlorobenzene<1.0 <1.09.3<1.0 <1.013.4<1.42.7 J NE NE2-Butanone (MEK)8.8 6.0 J 4.3 J 13.0 7.7 11.2 43.9 19.6 35,000 440,0002-Hexanone3.1 J 3.2 J 1.4 J 4.2 J<0.919.9 J<1.21.7 J 210 2,6002-Propanol (Isopropanol)3.5 J 5.6 10.1 4.6 J<1.031.7 158 94.6 1,400 18,0004-Ethyltoluene<0.95 <0.95 <0.92 <0.951.7 J 2.5 J 5.2 J 1.6 J NE NE4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)1.7 J 1.6 J 0.89 J 2.6 J 3.3 J 4.9 J 8.3 J 6.9 J 21,000 260,000Acetone36.9 33.1 23.3 102 354 66.6 285 103 220,000 2,700,000Benzene2.6 2.5 0.6918.1 19.210.724.72.0 12 160Bromodichloromethane1.5 J 1.5 J3.8<0.48 <0.49 <0.57 <0.6381.82.5 33Bromomethane1.1 J 0.36 J<0.290.98 J 1.9<0.362.9 0.49 J 35 440Carbon disulfide31.6 31.9 7.6 196 6.4 39.8 211 9.8 4,900 61,000Chlorobenzene<0.31 <0.310.91 J<0.31 <0.32 <0.37 <0.410.93 J 350 4,400Chloroethane<0.45 <0.45 <0.43 <0.45 <0.46 <0.545.3 0.90 J 70,000 880,000Chloroform24.7 24.0 13.0 4.7<0.38 <0.4473.47164.1 53Chloromethane2.3<0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.183.9<0.23 <0.15630 7,900Cyclohexane1.9 J 1.8 J 16.4 15.0 218 52.4 20.4 12.4 42,000 530,000Dibromochloromethane<1.0 <1.03.3 J<1.0 <1.1<1.2 <1.431.8 NE NEDichlorodifluoromethane2.6 2.8 2.2<0.38 <0.392.8 2.0 J 2.3 700 8,800Ethanol10.2 8.0 J 118 10.2 13.0 82.6 760 421 NE NEEthyl acetate<0.26 <0.261.3 J<0.26 <0.2717.0 4.7 7.2 490 6,100Ethylbenzene2.9 2.8 0.80 J 1.3 J 1.6 J 28.9 36.4 5.5 37 490Methylene Chloride<1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.23.8 J 13.3 22.1 3,400 53,000Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.25 <0.25 <0.24 <0.25 <0.26 <0.30 <0.34 <0.23360 4,700Naphthalene<4.4 <4.4<4.2 <4.45.8<5.26.0 J 8.62.8 36n-Heptane3.0 2.8 1.8 20.4 9.1 8.9 21.9 4.8 2,800 35,000n-Hexane6.7 5.9 3.1 J 34.8 4.3 16.3 28.4 6.1 4,900 61,000m&p-Xylene9.2 8.8 2.7 J 3.5 J 8.9 11.3 20.8 15.6 700 8,800o-Xylene3.1 3.0 0.94 J 1.5 J 9.3 5.5 31.4 6.4 700 8,800Propylene59.7 50.8<0.25 <0.26 <0.27 <0.31434 18.5 21,000 260,000Styrene<0.78 <0.78 <0.75 <0.78 <0.79 <0.92 <1.00.72 J 7,000 88,000Tetrachloroethene<0.59 <0.592.2<0.591.6 1.9 12.0 2.1 280 3,500Tetrahydrofuran<0.36 <0.36 <0.35 <0.36 <0.37 <0.43 <0.48 <0.3214,000 180,000Toluene17.2 16.5 11.8 6.7 6.3 50.6 59.4 197 35,000 440,000Trichloroethene<0.40 <0.40 <0.38 <0.40 <0.40 <0.471.0 J 0.79 J 14 180Trichlorofluoromethane1.5 J 1.5 J 1.5 J<0.47 <0.481.5 J 1.6 J 1.4 J NE NEVinyl chloride<0.18 <0.18 <0.17 <0.18 <0.18 <0.21 <0.23 <0.165.6 280Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated June 2021.Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).Laboratory analytical method is shown in parentheses.Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values exceed the Residential SGSL.Underlined values exceed the Non-Residential SGSL.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; NE = not establishedNote that due to dilution factor for sample SG-7, MDLs are above the DEQ DWM SGSLs for select compounds. J = Compound concentration was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.µg/m3µg/m3Screening Criteria Proposed Residential Building 8/5/2021Non-Residential SGSLs (1)Residential SGSLs (1)SG-9 / SG-DUPExterior Soil Gashttps://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Ardent - ACO/ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard/Phase II Assessment/Tables/Data Tables.xlsxTable 4 (Page 2 of 2)Hart & Hickman, PCPre-Excavation Data
Table 3Summary of Sub-Slab Vapor Analytical Data Harrelson Ford Charlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002Evaluation AreaSample IDSSV-3SSV-4MP-3SSV-5SSV-6SSV-5MP-30MP-43Sample Date5/16/20222/17/20222/16/20222/17/20225/17/20225/16/2022Sample TypeUnitsVOCs (TO-15)1,1,1-Trichloroethane1.86 J1.84 J<0.144<0.144<0.86<64<64<2.88<0.144<2.88<0.86<0.8635,000440,0001,1-Dichloroethene<0.107<0.107<0.107<0.107<0.60<45<45<2.14<0.1071.2331,40018,0001,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1.22 J1.33 J4.421.68 J2.5<33<33<2.202.91<2.203.96.74205,3001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.236<0.2361.32 J0.408 J0.61 J<39<39<4.720.732 J<4.721.124205,3001,3-Butadiene<0.328<0.328<0.328<0.328<0.37<28<2822.1<0.32822.1<0.37<0.373.1411,4-Dichlorobenzene<0.186<0.186<0.186<0.186<0.79<59<59<3.721.67 J<3.72<0.79<0.798.51101,4-Dioxane1.03 J0.951 J4.04<0.435<0.60<45<45<8.69<0.435<8.69<0.60<0.60192502-Butanone (MEK)4.935.712.943.35<6.3<470<4709.73 J15.99.73 J<6.37.9 J35,000440,0002-Hexanone3.233.223.283.50<0.41<31<31<5.713.93<5.71<0.41<0.412102,6002-Propanol (Isopropanol)22.823.121.62.11 JB6.0 J<250<2507.67 J61.27.67 J130<3.41,40018,0004-Ethyltoluene<0.128<0.1280.777 J<0.1280.81 J<45<4511.4 J0.600 J11.4 J0.83 J1.2NENE4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)0.508 J<0.1211.18 J1.01 J<0.44<33<33<2.424.48<2.42<0.44<0.4421,000260,000Acetone38.942.633.533.122<860<86024.4 J39824.4 J55<11NENEBenzene0.262 J0.303 J0.668 J0.326 J1.0<36<3635.90.393 J35.92.21512160Carbon disulfide2.29 J2.25 J0.532 J1.93 J<0.58<43<4325.9 J3.86 J25.9 J1.3 J<0.584,90061,000Chloroethane<0.164<0.164<0.164<0.164<0.47<35<3512.1 J<0.16412.1 J<0.47<0.4728,000350,000Chloroform<0.0864<0.0864<0.0864<0.08646.9<70<70<1.730.425 J<1.73<0.93<0.934.153Chloromethane<0.0673<0.0673<0.0673<0.0673<0.33<25<25<1.34<0.0673<1.341.4<0.336307,900cis-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.0955<0.0955<0.0955<0.0955<0.581,10099013,5001.13 J13,5001201,500NENECyclohexane<0.1614.696.916.812.5<31<3172.08.8072.0203642,000530,000Dichlorodifluoromethane2.792.752.722.763<72<72<2.682.62<2.682.22.6708,800EthanolNANANANA110 V-06<500<500NANANA50 V-0662 V-06NENEEthyl acetate<0.136<0.136<0.136<0.13662 L-03, V-05, V-34<270<270<2.72<0.136<2.72<3.6<3.64906,100Ethylbenzene0.395 J0.399 J2.09 J0.577 J0.89<38<3861.60.903 J61.62.2337490Methylene Chloride0.750 J0.750 J0.604 J0.986 J<3.2<240<240<9.750.938 J<9.75<3.2<3.23,40053,000Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.0336<0.0336<0.0336<0.0336<0.56<42<42252<0.0336252<0.56273604,700Naphthalene<0.183<0.1832.752.70<0.79<59<59<3.66<0.183<3.66<0.790.84 J2.836n-Heptane<0.143<0.1430.533 J<0.143<0.52<39<3923.8 J1.14 J23.8 J8.94.92,80035,000n-Hexane<0.0472<0.04721.10 J<0.0472<3.7<280<28050.3<0.047250.35916 J4,90061,000m&p-Xylene1.55 J1.48 J12.72.19 J2.4<73<732273.55 J2277.7107008,800o-Xylene0.734 J0.677 J12.61.15 J1.4<33<3374.61.61 J74.63.74.57008,800Propylene<0.242<0.24221.0<0.242<3.0<230<230393<0.242393<3.018021,000260,000Styrene0.430 J0.405 J0.741 J0.575 J<0.45<34<34<2.480.835 J<2.480.56 J0.65 J7,00088,000Tetrachloroethene6,6706,4401,0903.37 J 6957,00055,00032.2 J64732.2 J 874,6002803,500Tetrahydrofuran<0.1070.779 J<0.1070.457 J<0.97<73<73<2.14<0.107<2.14<0.97<0.9714,000180,000Toluene2.031.82 J4.022.727.9<32<322247.22224111735,000440,000trans-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.108<0.108<0.108<0.108<0.62<47<47132<0.1081320.82422803,500Trichloroethene1.54 J1.50 J<0.199<0.1991.3410370<3.9826.9<3.9838 2,00014180Trichlorofluoromethane1.12 J1.11 J1.32 J1.43 J1.5 J<100<100<2.601.33 J<2.601.4 J<1.3NENEVinyl chloride<0.127<0.127<0.127<0.127<0.46<35<3511,700<0.12711,7001.22705.6 280Xylene (Total)2.28 J2.16 J25.33.34 J3.8<106<1063025.16 J30211.414.57008,800Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated July 2022.Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).Laboratory analytical method is shown in parentheses.Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values exceed the Residential SGSL.Bold Underlined values exceed the Non-Residential SGSL.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; NE = not established; NA = not analyzed J = Compound concentration was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.L-03 = Laboratory fortified blank/laboratory control sample recovery is outside of control limits. Reported value for this compound is likely to be based on the low sideV-05 = Continuing calibration verification (CCV) did not meet method specifications and was biased on the low side for this compound.V-06 = Continuing calibration verification (CCV) did not meet method specifications and was biased on the high side for this compound.V-34 = Initial calibration verification (ICV) did not meet method specifications and was biased on the low side for this compound. Reported result is estimated.Screening Criteria Residential SGSLs (1)Non-Residential SGSLs (1)SSV-2/SSV-DUPBuilding 3Sub-Slab Soil Gas2/16/2022MP-18/MP-DUPBuilding 45/16/2022µg/m3https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Ardent - ACO/ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Sub-slab and Soil GasTable 3 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PCPre-Excavation Data
Table 2Summary of Soil Gas Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002Evaluation AreaBuilding 2ExteriorSample IDSSV-1 SSV-3 SSV-4 SSV-5 SSV-6 SG-16Sample Date2/17/20222/17/2022 2/16/2022 2/17/2022Sample TypeSoil GasUnitsVOCs (TO-15)1,1,1−Trichloroethane<0.1441.86 J 1.84 J<0.144 <0.144 <2.88 <0.144 <0.14435,000 440,0001,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane<0.104 <0.104 <0.104 <0.104 <0.104 <2.08 <0.104 <0.1042211,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane<0.561 <0.561 <0.561 <0.561 <0.561 <11.2 <0.5611.12 J35,000 440,0001,1-Dichloroethane<0.101 <0.101 <0.101 <0.101 <0.101 <2.02 <0.101 <0.10158 7701,2,4-Trimethylbenzene2.81 1.22 J 1.33 J 4.42 1.68 J<2.202.91 5.67420 5,3001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene0.703 J<0.236 <0.2361.32 J 0.408 J<4.720.732 J 1.97 J420 5,3001,3-Butadiene<0.328 <0.328 <0.328 <0.328 <0.32822.1<0.328 <0.3283.1 411,3-Dichlorobenzene<0.174 <0.174 <0.174 <0.174 <0.174 <3.48 <0.174 <0.174NE NE1,4-Dichlorobenzene<0.186 <0.186 <0.186 <0.186 <0.186 <3.721.67 J<0.1868.5 1101,4-Dioxane 1.86 1.03 J 0.951 J 4.04<0.435 <8.69 <0.435 <0.43519 2502-Butanone (MEK)1.70 4.93 5.71 2.94 3.35 9.73 J 15.9 15.635,000 440,0002-Hexanone<0.2853.23 3.22 3.28 3.50<5.713.93<0.285210 2,6002-Propanol (Isopropanol)4.99 22.8 23.1 21.6 2.11 JB 7.67 J 61.2<0.1391,400 18,0004-Ethyltoluene0.555 J<0.128 <0.1280.777 J<0.12811.4 J 0.600 J 1.96 JNE NE4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)<0.1210.508 J<0.1211.18 J 1.01 J<2.424.48 3.5621,000 260,000Acetone30.1 38.9 42.6 33.5 33.1 24.4 J 398 72.5NE NEBenzene0.588 J 0.262 J 0.303 J 0.668 J 0.326 J35.90.393 J20.912 160Bromodichloromethane<0.150 <0.150 <0.150 <0.150 <0.150 <3.00 <0.150 <0.1502.5 33Bromomethane<0.115 <0.115 <0.115 <0.115 <0.115 <2.30 <0.115 <0.11535 440Carbon disulfide2.06 J 2.29 J 2.25 J 0.532 J 1.93 J 25.9 J 3.86 J 12.04,900 61,000Carbon tetrachloride<0.155 <0.155 <0.155 <0.155 <0.155 <3.10 <0.1551.26 J16 200Chlorobenzene<0.107 <0.107 <0.107 <0.107 <0.107 <2.14 <0.107 <0.107350 4400Chloroethane<0.164 <0.164 <0.164 <0.164 <0.16412.1 J<0.164 <0.16428,000 350,000Chloroform12.1<0.0864 <0.0864 <0.0864 <0.0864 <1.730.425 J<0.08644.1 53Chloromethane<0.0673 <0.0673 <0.0673 <0.0673 <0.0673 <1.34 <0.06730.977 J630 7,900cis-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.0955 <0.0955 <0.0955 <0.0955 <0.095513,500 1.13 J<0.0955NE NECyclohexane5.42<0.1614.69 6.91 6.81 72.0 8.80 21.142,000 530,000Dibromochloromethane<0.208 <0.208 <0.208 <0.208 <0.208 <4.16 <0.208 <0.208NE NEDichlorodifluoromethane2.77 2.79 2.75 2.72 2.76<2.682.62 3.1670 8,800EthanolNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NEEthyl acetate<0.136 <0.136 <0.136 <0.136 <0.136 <2.72 <0.136 <0.136490 6,100Ethylbenzene1.18 J 0.395 J 0.399 J 2.09 J 0.577 J61.60.903 J 15.837 490Methylene Chloride0.841 J 0.750 J 0.750 J 0.604 J 0.986 J<9.750.938 J 2.173,400 53,000Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.0336 <0.0336 <0.0336 <0.0336 <0.0336252<0.0336 <0.0336360 4,700Naphthalene2.81<0.183 <0.1832.75 2.70<3.66 <0.1832.912.8 36n-Heptane0.750 J<0.143 <0.1430.533 J<0.14323.8 J 1.14 J 26.12,800 35,000n-Hexane0.779 J<0.0472 <0.04721.10 J<0.047250.3<0.047257.04,900 61,000m&p-Xylene4.45 J 1.55 J 1.48 J 12.7 2.19 J 227 3.55 J 55.0700 8,800o-Xylene1.97 J 0.734 J 0.677 J 12.6 1.15 J 74.6 1.61 J 15.2700 8,800Propylene<0.242 <0.242 <0.24221.0<0.242393<0.24215221,000 260,000Styrene0.596 J 0.430 J 0.405 J 0.741 J 0.575 J<2.480.835 J 1.58 J7,000 88,000Tetrachloroethene523 6,6706,4401,0903.37 J 32.2 J6472.44 J280 3,500Tetrahydrofuran<0.107 <0.1070.779 J<0.1070.457 J<2.14 <0.1071.5714,000 180,000Toluene5.18 2.03 1.82 J 4.02 2.72 224 7.22 25935,000 440,000trans-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.108 <0.108 <0.108 <0.108 <0.108132<0.108 <0.108280 3,500Trichloroethene<0.1991.54 J 1.50 J<0.199 <0.199 <3.9826.9<0.19914 180Trichlorofluoromethane1.65 J 1.12 J 1.11 J 1.32 J 1.43 J<2.601.33 J 2.57 JNE NEVinyl chloride<0.127 <0.127 <0.127 <0.127 <0.12711,700<0.127 <0.1275.6 280Xylene (Total) 6.42 J 2.28 J 2.16 J 25.3 3.34 J 302 5.16 J 70.2700 8,800Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated January 2022.Samples were collected by H&H during Phase II Environmental Site Assessment activities in August 2021 and during Brownfields assessment activities in February 2022.Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).Laboratory analytical method is shown in parentheses.Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values exceed the Residential SGSL.Underlined values exceed the Non-Residential SGSL.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; NE = not established; NA = not analyzed Note that due to dilution factor for sample SG-7, MDLs are above the DEQ DWM SGSLs for select compounds. J = Compound concentration was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.B = Compound was detected in the laboratory method blank.Sub-Slab Soil GasScreening Criteria Residential SGSLs (1)Non-Residential SGSLs (1)Building 3SSV-2/SSV-DUPµg/m32/16/2022Building 4https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Ardent - ACO/ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Assessment/tables/draft Data Tables (combined).xlsxTable 2 (Page 3 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PCPre-Excavation Data
Table 4Summary of Soil Gas Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002Evaluation AreaExteriorSample IDSG-2 SG-3 SG-8 SG-12 SG-13 SG-16Sample Date2/17/2022Sample TypeUnitsVOCs (TO-15)1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane<0.75 <0.78 <0.94 <0.771.7 J<0.1041.6 211,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane0.91 J 1.3 J<0.73 <0.602.9 J1.12 J35,000 440,0001,1-Dichloroethane<0.33 <0.35 <0.42 <0.340.46 J<0.101587701,2,4-Trimethylbenzene10.5 1.6 J 8.4 10.7 12.05.67420 5,3001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene3.0 0.78 J 5.0 4.8 5.41.97 J420 5,3001,3-Dichlorobenzene6.6 7.9<1.3 <1.013.4<0.174NE NE2-Butanone (MEK)19.0 24.9 64.0 7.7 11.215.635,000 440,0002-Hexanone1.5 J<0.9317.2<0.919.9 J<0.285210 2,6002-Propanol (Isopropanol)<1.01.8 J<1.3 <1.031.7<0.1391,400 18,0004-Ethyltoluene4.6 J 3.2 J 1.8 J 1.7 J 2.5 J1.96 JNE NE4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)3.0 J 2.4 J 6.9 J 3.3 J 4.9 J3.5621,000 260,000Acetone26.6 51.3 552 354 66.672.5220,000 2,700,000Benzene1.619.1 19.4 19.210.720.912 160Bromodichloromethane5.30.65 J<0.60 <0.49 <0.57<0.1502.5 33Bromomethane0.61 J<0.320.48 J 1.9<0.36<0.11535 440Carbon disulfide42.3 101 217 6.4 39.812.04,900 61,000Carbon tetrachloride<0.57 <0.59 <0.71 <0.58 <0.671.26 JChlorobenzene<0.31 <0.33 <0.39 <0.32 <0.37<0.107350 4,400Chloroethane0.93 J 1.8<0.56 <0.46 <0.54<0.16470,000 880,000Chloroform87.61200.92 J<0.38 <0.44<0.08644.1 53Chloromethane<0.17 <0.18 <0.21 <0.183.90.977 J630 7,900Cyclohexane2.9 J 52.2 63.5 218 52.421.142,000 530,000Dibromochloromethane<1.0 <1.1 <1.3 <1.1 <1.2<0.208NE NEDichlorodifluoromethane3.3 2.3<0.47 <0.392.83.16700 8,800Ethanol7.6 29.5 66.8 13.0 82.6NANE NEEthyl acetate<0.260.67 J 1.3 J<0.2717.0<0.136490 6,100Ethylbenzene12.6 4.3 4.3 1.6 J 28.915.837 490Methylene Chloride<1.210.4<1.5 <1.23.8 J2.173,400 53,000Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.25 <0.26651<0.26 <0.30<0.0336360 4,700Naphthalene<4.4 <4.6 <5.55.8<5.22.912.8 36n-Heptane4.4 33.8 27.4 9.1 8.926.12,800 35,000n-Hexane16.9 84.0 74.1 4.3 16.357.04,900 61,000m&p-Xylene41.6 6.0 15.4 8.9 11.355.0700 8,800o-Xylene20.6 3.5 6.3 9.3 5.515.2700 8,800Propylene46.9 787<0.33 <0.27 <0.3115221,000 260,000Styrene<0.781.4 J<0.97 <0.79 <0.921.58 J7,000 88,000Tetrachloroethene23.7 1.7 16.3 1.6 1.92.44 J280 3,500Tetrahydrofuran<0.36 <0.38 <0.45 <0.37 <0.431.5714,000 180,000Toluene32.8 20.1 31.9 6.3 50.625935,000 440,000Trichloroethene<0.40 <0.41 <0.49 <0.40 <0.47<0.19914 180Trichlorofluoromethane1.2 J 0.96 J 2.6 J<0.481.5 J2.57 JNE NEVinyl chloride<0.182.0<0.22 <0.18 <0.21<0.1275.6 280Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated July 2022.Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).Laboratory analytical method is shown in parentheses.Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values exceed the Residential SGSL.Bold Underlined values exceed the Non-Residential SGSL.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; NE = not establishedJ = Compound concentration was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.µg/m3µg/m3Screening Criteria 8/5/2021Non-Residential SGSLs (1)Residential SGSLs (1)Building 3 and Building 4Exterior Soil Gashttps://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Ardent - ACO/ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Data Tables_JRLTable 4 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PCPre-Excavation Data
BG-3
BG-2
BG-1
SB-6 SB-7
SB-3
SB-5
SB-4 SB-2
SG-5
SG-1
SG-6
SG-11
SG-12SG-7
SG-2
SG-3
SG-8
SG-13
SG-14
SG-4
SG-9
SG-10 SG-15
TMW-1
TMW-5
TMW-3/SB-8
TMW-4/SB-1
TMW-2
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. ACO-002
DATE: 2-1-22
FIGURE NO. 3
HARRELSON FORD6500 SOUTH BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PARCEL BOUNDARY
EXISTING BUILDING LOCATION
RAILROAD
2' ELEVATION CONTOURS (FT. MSL)
TRENCH DRAIN
RECTANGULAR FLOOR DRAIN
CIRCULAR FLOOR DRAIN
FORMER UST
VENT PIPE
OUT-OF-USE IN-GROUND HYDRAULIC LIFT
OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
PROPOSED TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT
FORMER MONITORING WELL LOCATION
FORMER CO-LOCATED SOIL BORING ANDTEMPORARY MONITORING WELL LOCATION
FORMER SOIL BORING LOCATION
FORMER BACKGROUND SOIL BORINGLOCATION
FORMER SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
SOIL BORING LOCATION
SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
SUB-SLAB SAMPLE LOCATION
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
PARKING
NOTES:
1. PARCEL DATA OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG COUNTY
GIS, 2021.2. PRELIMINARY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PREPARED BY
LAND DESIGN.3. ELEVATION CONTOURS OBTAINED FROM MECKLEBURGCOUNTY LIDAR, 2017.4. FORMER SOIL, GROUNDWATER, AND SOIL GAS SAMPLES
COLLECTED BY H&H IN AUGUST 2021.5. UST = UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKFT. MSL = FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVELOLD PINEVILLE ROADSOUTH BOULEVARDBUILDING 1
BUILDING 2
BUILDING 4
BUILDING 3
644
SB-9
SSV-1
SSV-2
SSV-3
SSV-4
SSV-5 SSV-6
SG-16
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Ardent - ACO\ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard\Brownfields\Assessment\Work Plan\Figures\Figures 20220201.dwg, FIG 3, 2/28/2022 8:27:21 AM, shaynesPre-Excavation Data
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. ACO-002
DATE: 6-13-22
FIGURE NO. 3
HARRELSON FORD
6500 SOUTH BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
BUILDING #4
BUILDING #3
OFFICE/STORAGE
OFFICE
OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
HL-18 HL-17 HL-16 HL-15 HL-14
HL-13 HL-12
HL-7HL-4 HL-3
HL-6 HL-5
HL-19
HL-20
HL-21 HL-22 HL-23 HL-11 HL-10 HL-9
HL-8
HL-2
SG-7
SG-2
SB-2
SB-4
SB-5
SB-3
TMW-4/SB-1
SG-3
SG-8
SSV-6
SSV-5
SB-6
SB-7
TMW-3/SB-8
SSV-3 SSV-4
SSV-2
SG-16
SB-9
SG-13
SG-12
TMW-5
MP-1
MP-2
MP-5
MP-6
MP-9
MP-10
MP-13
MP-14
MP-17
MP-18
MP-21
MP-22
MP-25
MP-26
MP-27
MP-28
MP-23
MP-24
MP-19
MP-20
MP-15
MP-16
MP-11
MP-12
MP-7
MP-8
MP-3
MP-4
MP-29
MP-31
MP-32
MP-33
MP-34
MP-35
MP-36
MP-37
MP-38
MP-39
MP-40
MP-44
MP-42
MP-41 MP-45
MP-46
MP-47
MP-48
MP-18A
MP-18B
MP-18C
MP-18D
MP-3A
MP-3B
MP-3C
MP-3D
MP-30A
MP-30B
MP-30C
MP-30D
MP-43A
MP-43B
MP-43C
MP-43D
MP-43B 0-1'
PCE 1.3
TCE 0.031
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
SAMPLE ID
SAMPLE DEPTH
CONCENTRATION
(mg/kg)
CONSTITUENT
MP-18 0-1'1-2'
PCE 0.65 0.21
TCE ND ND
VC ND ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND ND
MP-3 0-1'
NO DETECTIONS
MP-18C 0-1'
PCE 0.022
TCE ND
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
MP-18D 0-1'
PCE 0.073
TCE ND
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
MP-18A 0-1'
PCE 0.53
TCE ND
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
MP-18B 0-1'
PCE 0.18
TCE ND
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
MP-30 0-1'
NO DETECTIONS
MP-30B 0-1'
NO DETECTIONS
MP-30A 0-1'
NO DETECTIONS
MP-30C 0-1'
NO DETECTIONS
MP-30D 0-1'
NO DETECTIONS
MP-43 1-2'2-3'
PCE 0.14 ND
TCE 0.0071 ND
VC ND ND
cis-1,2-DCE 0.0033 J 0.0066 J
MP-43B 0-1'
PCE 1.3
TCE 0.031
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
MP-43A 1-2'
NO DETECTIONS
MP-43D 1-2'
NO DETECTIONS
MP-43C 1-2'
PCE 0.73
TCE 0.020
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
MP-30
MP-43
NOTES:
1. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS, 2021.
2. CVOCs NOT DETECTED AT CONCENTRATIONS ABOVE
MDLs IN GREY SAMPLES.
3. CVOCs DETECTED AT CONCENTRATIONS BELOW DEQ
DWM VAPOR INTRUSION VISLs IN GREEN HIGHLIGHTED
SAMPLES.
4. CVOCs DETECTED AT CONCENTRATIONS ABOVE DEQ
DWM VAPOR INTRUSION VISLs IN BLUE HIGHLIGHTED
SAMPLES.
5. SOIL, GROUNDWATER, SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS, AND
EXTERIOR SOIL GAS SAMPLES COLLECTED BY H&H IN
AUGUST 2021, FEBRUARY 2022, AND MAY 2022.
6.
7.
J FLAG DENOTES ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION BETWEEN
LABORATORY REPORTING LIMIT AND METHOD
DETECTION LIMIT.
BOLD VALUE INDICATES COMPOUND EXCEEDS THE
PROTECTION OF GROUNDWATER PSRG.ONLY VOC COMPOUNDS SHOWN
ACRONYM KEY
PCE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TCE TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VC VINYL CHLORIDE
cis-1,2-DCE cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
ND NOT DETECTED
CVOCs CHLORINATED VOLATILE
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
SGSLs SUB-SLAB AND EXTERIOR SOIL
GAS SCREENING LEVELS
MDLs LABORATORY METHOD
DETECTION LIMITS
HL-10 8-10'
PCE 0.14
TCE 0.012
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
HL-17 8-10'
PCE 0.014
TCE ND
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE 0.0077
HL-18 8-10'
PCE ND
TCE ND
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE 0.046
HL-20 8-10'
PCE 0.93
TCE 0.041
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
HL-22 8-10'
PCE 0.018
TCE ND
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE 0.0081
HL-23 8-10'
PCE 0.085
TCE ND
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
SB-2 2-4'
PCE 0.018
TCE 0.0075
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
SB-6 2-4'
PCE 0.11
TCE 0.012
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE 0.014
SB-7 2-4'
PCE 0.47
TCE 0.0058
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF FLOOR DRAIN
SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS SURVEY MONITORING
POINT
EXTERIOR SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
SOIL BORING LOCATION
CO-LOCATED SOIL BORING AND
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL LOCATION
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL LOCATION
EVALUATION AREA
EVALUATION DESIGNATION
TMW-6
A
A C E G I K M
B D F H J L N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Ardent - ACO\ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard\Brownfields\Additional Assessment\Figures\Figures 20220614.dwg, FIG 5, 7/12/2022 8:07:26 AM, shaynes8.
Pre-Excavation Data
Table 1Summary of Post-Excavation Confirmation Soil Samples for Excavation AHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDEXA-SW-N EXA-SW-S EXA-SW-WDepth (ft bgs)3-6 0-3 3-6 3-6 3-6Sample Date2/6/2023 2/6/2023 2/6/2023 2/6/2023 2/6/2023UnitsVOCs (8260D)Chloromethane0.0118 J 0.0119 J<0.00550.0217<0.00510.015 23 99cis-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.00240.012 0.0094<0.0024 <0.00210.41 13 78Methylene Chloride<0.01910.0216 J,C90.0868 C90.159 C9<0.01680.025 58 650Methyl tert-butyl ether<0.00260.0030 J<0.0024 <0.0026 <0.00230.09 49 220Tetrachloroethene<0.0022 <0.0020 <0.0021 <0.0022 <0.00190.0063 17 82Trichloroethene<0.0056 <0.0052 <0.0053 <0.0056 <0.00490.021 0.87 4.0Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2023. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values indicate compound concentration exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; ft bgs = feet below ground surfaceJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. C9 = Common laboratory contaminant. Screening Criteria Building 3 - Excavation AProtection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)mg/kgResidential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)EXA-SW-Ehttps://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Soil Removal/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Soil Removal Data Tables3/27/2023Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PCPost-Excavation Data
Table 2Summary of Post-Excavation Confirmation Soil Samples for Excavation BHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDEXB-SW-N1-2 EXB-SW-N2-2 EXB-TN-N2 EXB-SW-E1-2 EXB-SW-E2-2 EXB-SW-S2-2 EXB-SW-W1-A EXB-SW-W1-B EXB-SW-W2Depth (ft bgs)3-6 3-6 5-7 3-6 3-6 3-6 3-6 3-6 3-6Sample Date2/14/2023 2/17/2023 2/23/2023 2/14/2023 2//14/2023 2/10/2023 2/16/2023 2/16/2023 2/6/2023UnitsVOCs (8260D)Chloromethane0.0060 J<0.0060 <0.0045 <0.0050 <0.0051 <0.0063 <0.0061 <0.0050 <0.0063 <0.0060 <0.00680.015 23 99Methylene Chloride<0.0179<0.0197<0.0148<0.0162<0.01660.0314 C90.0818 C9<0.0164<0.0205<0.0196<0.02210.02558650Tetrachloroethene<0.00210.01330.0037 J<0.0019<0.0019<0.0024<0.0023<0.0019<0.0024<0.0023<0.00250.00631782Trichloroethene <0.0053 <0.0058<0.0043<0.0048<0.0049<0.0060<0.0059<0.0048<0.0060<0.0058<0.00650.0210.874.0Xylene (Total)<0.0037<0.0041<0.0031<0.0034<0.0035<0.0042<0.0042<0.0034<0.00430.0143<0.00469.9120530m&p-Xylene<0.0045<0.0049<0.0037<0.0040<0.0042<0.0051<0.0050<0.0041<0.00510.0070 J<0.00559.8120500o-Xylene<0.0029<0.0032<0.0024<0.0026<0.0027<0.0033<0.0032<0.0026<0.00330.0073<0.00369.8140590Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2023. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above. Bold values indicate compound concentration exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; ft bgs = feet below ground surfaceJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. C9 = Common laboratory contaminant. Building 3 - Excavation Bmg/kgProtection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Screening Criteria 3-6EXB-SW-S1-2/DUP-02 2/10/2023https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Soil Removal/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Soil Removal Data Tables3/27/2023Table 2 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PCPost-Excavation Data
Table 3Summary of Post-Excavation Confirmation Soil Samples for Excavation CHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDEXC-SW-N EXC-SW-E EXC-SW-S EXC-SW-W EXC-BDepth (ft bgs)3-6 3-6 3-6 3-6 7Sample Date2/6/2023 2/6/2023 2/6/2023 2/6/2023 2/6/2023UnitsVOCs (8260D)Methyl tert-butyl ether0.0071<0.0025 <0.0023 <0.0024<0.00230.09 49 220Methylene Chloride<0.0178 <0.01860.0532 C9<0.0175<0.01670.025 58 650Tetrachloroethene<0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0019 <0.0020<0.00190.0063 17 82Trichloroethene<0.0052 <0.0055 <0.0050 <0.0052<0.00490.021 0.87 4.0Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2023. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values indicate compound concentration exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; ft bgs = feet below ground surfaceC9 = Common laboratory contaminant. mg/kgProtection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Screening Criteria Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Building 3 - Excavation Chttps://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Soil Removal/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Soil Removal Data Tables3/27/2023Table 3 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PCPost-Excavation Data
Table 4Summary of Post-Excavation Confirmation Soil Samples for Excavation DHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDEXD-SW-N-BEXD-SW-N2 EXD-SW-N3 EXD-SW-N4Depth (ft bgs)3-66-9 3-6 3-6Sample Date3/1/20232/14/2023 2/8/2023 2/8/2023UnitsVOCs (8260D)2-Butanone (MEK)<0.0293 <0.0295 <0.0269 <0.0255 <0.0268 <0.0361 <0.0298 <0.0314175,500 40,000cis-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.0021<0.0021<0.0019<0.0018<0.0019<0.0026<0.0021<0.00220.411378n-Butylbenzene<0.0038<0.0039<0.0035<0.0033<0.0035<0.00470.0050 J<0.00414.578012,000sec-Butylbenzene<0.0027<0.0027<0.0025<0.0023<0.0025<0.0033<0.0027<0.00294.11,60023,000Ethylbenzene0.0059 J<0.0029<0.0026<0.0025<0.0026<0.0035<0.0029<0.0030136.127Methylene Chloride<0.0167<0.0168<0.01530.0450 C9<0.01530.0498 C9,B<0.0170.0398 C90.02558650p-Isopropyltoluene<0.0030<0.0030<0.0028<0.0026<0.0027<0.0037<0.0031<0.0032NENENETetrachloroethene<0.0019<0.0019<0.0018<0.0017<0.0018<0.0024<0.0020<0.00210.00631782Toluene0.00890.00800.0049 J<0.0037<0.0039<0.0052<0.0043<0.00458.39909,700Trichloroethene<0.0049<0.0049<0.0045<0.0043<0.0045<0.0061 <50.0050 <0.00530.0210.874.01,2,4-Trimethylbenzene0.0060 J<0.0036<0.0033<0.0032<0.0033<0.0045<0.0037<0.00391263370Xylene (Total)0.0109 J<0.0035<0.0032<0.0030<0.0032<0.0043<0.0035<0.00379.9120530m&p-Xylene0.0109 J<0.0042<0.0038<0.0036<0.0038<0.0051<0.0043<0.00459.8120500o-Xylene<0.0027<0.0027<0.0025<0.0023<0.0025<0.0033<0.0027<0.00299.8120590Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2023. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values indicate compound concentration exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; NE = not established J = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. C9 = Common laboratory contaminant. B = Compound was detected in the laboratory method blank. mg/kgEXD-SW-N-C/DUP-083-63/1/2023EXD-SW-N2/DUP-033-62/10/2023Building 3 - Excavation DScreening Criteria Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Soil Removal/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Soil Removal Data Tables3/28/2023Table 4 (Page 1 of 4)Hart & Hickman, PCPost-Excavation Data
Table 4Summary of Post-Excavation Confirmation Soil Samples for Excavation DHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDEXD-SW-N5 EXD-SW-N6-A EXD-SW-N6-B-2 EXD-SW-E1 EXD-SW-E2Depth (ft bgs)3-6 3-6 3-6 3-6 3-6Sample Date2/8/2023 2/16/2023 2/23/2023 2/16/2023 2/16/2023UnitsVOCs (8260D)2-Butanone (MEK)<0.0327 <0.0292 <0.0294 <0.0297 <0.0301 <0.0317 <0.0296175,500 40,000cis-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.0023<0.00210.0365<0.0021<0.0021<0.0023<0.00210.411378n-Butylbenzene<0.0043<0.0038<0.0039<0.0039<0.0039<0.0042<0.00394.578012,000sec-Butylbenzene<0.0030<0.0027<0.0027<0.0027<0.0028<0.0029<0.00274.11,60023,000Ethylbenzene<0.0032<0.0028<0.00290.0036 J<0.0029<0.0031<0.0029136.127Methylene Chloride0.0659 C9<0.0167<0.0168<0.0170<0.0172<0.0181<0.01690.02558650p-Isopropyltoluene<0.0033<0.0030<0.0030<0.0030<0.0031<0.0032<0.0030NENENETetrachloroethene<0.0022<0.00190.0042 J<0.0020<0.0020<0.0021<0.00200.00631782Toluene<0.0047<0.0042<0.0042<0.0043<0.0043<0.0046<0.00438.39909,700Trichloroethene<0.0055<0.0049<0.0049<0.0050<0.0050<0.0053<0.00500.0210.874.01,2,4-Trimethylbenzene<0.0040<0.0036<0.0036<0.0037<0.0037<0.0039<0.00371263370Xylene (Total)<0.0039<0.0035<0.00350.0153<0.0036<0.0038<0.00359.9120530m&p-Xylene<0.0047<0.0042<0.00420.0064 J<0.0043<0.0045<0.00429.8120500o-Xylene<0.0030<0.0027<0.00270.0089<0.0028<0.0029<0.00279.8120590Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2023. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values indicate compound concentration exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; NE = not established J = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. C9 = Common laboratory contaminant. B = Compound was detected in the laboratory method blank. mg/kgBuilding 3 - Excavation DScreening CriteriaEXD-SW-N7/DUP-053-62/16/2023Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Soil Removal/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Soil Removal Data Tables3/28/2023Table 4 (Page 2 of 4)Hart & Hickman, PCPost-Excavation Data
Table 4Summary of Post-Excavation Confirmation Soil Samples for Excavation DHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDEXD-TS-1 EXD-SW-S2-B EXD-SW-S3 EXD-SW-S4 EXD-SW-S4-2Depth (ft bgs)3-6 6-9 5-7 6-9 3-6 3-6 0-3Sample Date2/14/2023 2/14/2023 2/21/2023 2/14/2023 2/8/2023 2/8/2023 2/9/2023UnitsVOCs (8260D)2-Butanone (MEK)<0.02620.0350 J<0.0259 <0.0254 <0.0269 <0.0270 <0.0273 <0.0281 <0.0271175,500 40,000cis-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.0019<0.0025<0.0018<0.0018<0.0019<0.0019<0.0019<0.0020<0.00190.411378n-Butylbenzene<0.0034<0.0046<0.0034<0.0033<0.0035<0.0035<0.0036<0.0037<0.00364.578012,000sec-Butylbenzene<0.00240.0305<0.0024<0.0023<0.0025<0.0025<0.0025<0.0026<0.00254.11,60023,000Ethylbenzene<0.0025<0.0034<0.0025<0.0025<0.0026<0.0026<0.0026<0.0027<0.0026136.127Methylene Chloride0.258 C9,B0.327 C9<0.01480.222 C9,B0.0783 C9,B0.241 C9,B0.0519 C90.0876 C9<0.01550.02558650p-Isopropyltoluene<0.0027<0.0036<0.0027<0.0026<0.0028<0.0028<0.0028<0.0029<0.0028NENENETetrachloroethene0.5643.81<0.0017<0.0017<0.0018<0.0018<0.0018<0.0018<0.00180.00631782Toluene<0.00380.0226<0.0037<0.0036<0.0039<0.0039<0.0039<0.0040<0.00398.39909,700Trichloroethene<0.00440.0270<0.0044<0.0043<0.0045<0.0045<0.0046<0.0047<0.00460.0210.874.01,2,4-Trimethylbenzene<0.0032<0.0043<0.0032<0.0031<0.0033<0.0033<0.0034<0.0035<0.00341263370Xylene (Total)<0.00310.0356<0.0031<0.0030<0.0032<0.0032<0.0032<0.0033<0.00329.9120530m&p-Xylene<0.00370.0254<0.0037<0.0036<0.0038<0.0038<0.0039<0.0040<0.00399.8120500o-Xylene<0.00240.0102<0.0024<0.0023<0.0025<0.0025<0.0025<0.0026<0.00259.8120590Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2023. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values indicate compound concentration exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; NE = not established J = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. C9 = Common laboratory contaminant. B = Compound was detected in the laboratory method blank. Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Building 3 - Excavation DProtection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Screening Criteria mg/kg2/14/2023EXD-SW-S1 EXD-SW-S2-B/DUP-043-6https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Soil Removal/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Soil Removal Data Tables3/28/2023Table 4 (Page 3 of 4)Hart & Hickman, PCPost-Excavation Data
Table 4Summary of Post-Excavation Confirmation Soil Samples for Excavation DHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDEXD-SW-S5 EXD-SW-S6 EXD-SW-S7 EXD-SW-W2-2 EXD-SW-W3Depth (ft bgs)3-6 3-6 3-6 3-6 6-9 5-7 3-6Sample Date2/8/2023 2/7/2023 2/16/2023 2/14/2023 2/14/2023 2/21/2023 3/1/2023UnitsVOCs (8260D)2-Butanone (MEK)<0.0451 <0.0296 <0.0301 <0.0285 <0.0496 <0.0383 <0.0288175,500 40,000cis-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.00320.0034 J<0.0021<0.0020<0.0035<0.0027<0.00200.411378n-Butylbenzene<0.0059<0.0039<0.0039<0.0037<0.0065<0.0050<0.00384.578012,000sec-Butylbenzene<0.0041<0.0027<0.0028<0.0026<0.0045<0.0035<0.00264.11,60023,000Ethylbenzene<0.0044<0.00290.0041 J<0.0028<0.0048<0.0037<0.0028136.127Methylene Chloride<0.02580.106 C9<0.01720.239 C9,B0.336 C9 <0.0219<0.01640.02558650p-Isopropyltoluene<0.0046<0.0030<0.0031<0.0029<0.0051<0.0039<0.0029NENENETetrachloroethene<0.0030<0.0019<0.0020<0.0019<0.0033<0.0025<0.00190.00631782Toluene<0.0065<0.0042<0.0043<0.0041<0.0071<0.00550.0050 J8.39909,700Trichloroethene<0.0076<0.0050<0.0051<0.0048<0.0083<0.0064<0.00480.0210.874.01,2,4-Trimethylbenzene<0.0056<0.0037<0.0037<0.0035<0.0061<0.0047<0.00361263370Xylene (Total)<0.0054<0.00350.0162<0.0034<0.0059<0.0046<0.00349.9120530m&p-Xylene<0.0064<0.00420.0072 J<0.0041<0.0071<0.0055<0.00419.8120500o-Xylene<0.0042<0.00270.0090<0.0026<0.0046<0.0035<0.00269.8120590Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2023. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values indicate compound concentration exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; NE = not established J = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. C9 = Common laboratory contaminant. B = Compound was detected in the laboratory method blank. Screening Criteria Building 3 - Excavation Dmg/kgEXD-SW-W1Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Soil Removal/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Soil Removal Data Tables3/28/2023Table 4 (Page 4 of 4)Hart & Hickman, PCPost-Excavation Data
Table 5Summary of Post-Excavation Confirmation Soil Samples for Excavation EHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDEXE-SW-1N-A EXE-SW-1N-B EXE-SW-1N-C EXE-SW-2N EXE-SW-3N-A EXE-SW-3N-B EXE-SW-3N-C EXE-SW-4N EXE-SW-5N-A EXE-SW-5N-B EXE-SW-6N-3 EXE-TN-6 EXE-SW-7N-3Depth (ft bgs)2-52-52-52-52-52-52-52-53-63-63-65-73-6Sample Date2/17/2023 2/17/2023 2/17/2023 2/8/2023 2/10/2023 2/10/2023 2/10/2023 2/8/2023 2/20/2023 2/20/2023 2/20/2023 2/22/2023 2/20/2023UnitsVOCs (8260D)Acetone<0.0412 <0.0358 <0.0365 <0.0440 <0.0412 <0.0474 <0.0439 <0.0444 <0.0416 <0.0466 <0.0410 <0.0421 <0.038125 14,000 210,000Bromomethane<0.0199 <0.0173 <0.0176 <0.0212 <0.0199 <0.0229 <0.0212 <0.0214 <0.0201 <0.0225 <0.0198 <0.0203 <0.01840.051.46.4tert-Butylbenzene <0.0023 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0024 <0.0023 <0.0026 <0.0024 <0.0025 <0.0023 <0.0026 <0.0023 <0.0023 <0.00213.11,60023,000Chloromethane<0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0048 <0.0058 <0.0054 <0.0062 <0.0057 <0.0058 <0.0054 <0.0061 <0.0054 <0.0055 <0.00500.01523992-Chlorotoluene<0.023 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0024 <0.0023 <0.0026 <0.0024 <0.0024 <0.0023 <0.0026 <0.0023 <0.0023 <0.00212.03104,700cis-1,2-Dichloroethene0.0436<0.00190.0701 0.211 0.0942 0.0073 J 0.0203 0.0653<0.0022 <0.00250.0056 J<0.0022 <0.00200.411378Diisopropyl ether<0.0017 <0.0015 <0.0015 <0.0018 <0.0017 <0.0020 <0.0018 <0.0019 <0.0018 <0.0020 <0.0017 <0.0018 <0.00160.364802,000Ethylbenzene<0.0030 <0.0026 <0.0026 <0.0032 <0.0030 <0.0034 <0.0032 <0.0032 <0.0030 <0.00340.0036 J<0.0031 <0.0028136.127p-Isopropyltoluene<0.0032 <0.0027 <0.0028 <0.0034 <0.0032 <0.0036 <0.0034 <0.0034 <0.0032 <0.0036 <0.0031 <0.0032 <0.0029NENENEMethyl-tert-butyl ether0.0049 J<0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0026 <0.0024 <0.0028 <0.0026 <0.0026 <0.0024 <0.0027 <0.0024 <0.0025 <0.00220.0949220Methylene Chloride<0.0176 <0.0153 <0.0156 <0.01880.0532 C9<0.02020.0702 C90.0300 C9<0.0178 <0.0199 <0.0175 <0.0180 <0.01630.02558650n-Propylbenzene<0.0023 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0024 <0.0023 <0.0026 <0.0024 <0.0025 <0.0023 <0.0026 <0.0023 <0.0023 <0.00212.67805,100Tetrachloroethene<0.0020 <0.0018 <0.0018 <0.0022 <0.0020 <0.0023 <0.0022 <0.0022 <0.0020 <0.0023 <0.0020 <0.0021 <0.00190.00631782Toluene<0.0044 <0.0038 <0.0039 <0.0047 <0.0044 <0.0051 <0.0047 <0.0048 <0.0045 <0.0050 <0.0044 <0.0045 <0.00418.39909,700Trichloroethene<0.0052 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0055 <0.0052 <0.0060 <0.0055 <0.0056 <0.0052 <0.00590.0057 J<0.0053 <0.00480.0210.874.01,2,4-Trimethylbenzene<0.0038 <0.0033 <0.0034 <0.0041 <0.0038 <0.0044 <0.0041 <0.0041 <0.00390.0047 J 0.0079<0.00390.0054 J12633701,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.0022 <0.0019 <0.0019 <0.0023 <0.0022 <0.0025 <0.0023 <0.0023 <0.0022 <0.00240.0033 J<0.00220.0035 J1156320Xylene (Total)<0.0037 <0.0032 <0.0032 <0.0039 <0.0037 <0.0042 <0.0039 <0.0039 <0.00370.0088 J 0.0082 J<0.00370.0055 J9.9120530m&p-Xylene<0.0044 <0.0038 <0.0039 <0.0047 <0.0044 <0.0051 <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.00440.0088 J 0.0082 J<0.00450.0055 J9.8120500o-Xylene<0.0028 <0.0025 <0.0025 <0.0030 <0.0028 <0.0033 <0.0030 <0.0031 <0.0029 <0.0032 <0.0028 <0.0029 <0.00269.8140590Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2023. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values indicate compound concentration exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; NE = not establishedJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. C9 = Common laboratory contaminant. B = Compound was detected in the laboratory method blank. Building 4 - Excavation E - Northern Sidewallmg/kgScreening Criteria Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Soil Removal/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Soil Removal Data Tables3/28/2023Table 5 (Page 1 of 5)Hart & Hickman, PCPost-Excavation Data
Table 5Summary of Post-Excavation Confirmation Soil Samples for Excavation EHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDEXE-SW-8N-B EXE-SW-1S-B EXE-SW-2S-B EXE-SW-3S-A EXE-SW-4S-A EXE-SW-5S-B EXE-SW-6S-2 EXE-SW-7S-2 EXE-SW-8S EXE-TS-8Depth (ft bgs)2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 3-6 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5Sample Date2/14/2023 2/17/2023 2/17/2023 2/17/2023 2/17/2023 2/8/2023 2/10/2023 2/10/2023 2/10/2023 2/22/2023UnitsVOCs (8260D)Acetone<0.04810.0621 J<0.0381 <0.0384 <0.0396 <0.0380 <0.0383 <0.0414 <0.387 <0.0461 <0.0424 <0.040225 14,000 210,000Bromomethane<0.0232 <0.0187 <0.0184 <0.0185 <0.0191 <0.0184 <0.0185 <0.0019 <0.187 <0.0223 <0.0205 <0.01940.051.46.4tert-Butylbenzene<0.0027 <0.0022 <0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0022 <0.00210.0032 J<0.0023 <0.0215 <0.0026 <0.0024 <0.00223.11,60023,000Chloromethane<0.0063 <0.0051 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0052 <0.00500.0072 J<0.005439.6<0.00600.0067 J<0.00530.01523992-Chlorotoluene<0.0027 <0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0022 <0.00210.0033 J<0.0023 <0.0214 <0.0025 <0.0023 <0.00222.03104,700cis-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.0026 <0.0021 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0021 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0022 <0.02060.0363 0.0188<0.00210.411378Diisopropyl ether<0.0020 <0.0016 <0.0016 <0.0016 <0.0017 <0.00160.0080 0.0055 J<0.0163 <0.0019 <0.00180.0049 J0.364802,000Ethylbenzene<0.00350.0046 J<0.0028 <0.0028 <0.0029 <0.00280.0060 0.0034 J<0.0281 <0.0033 <0.0031 <0.0029136.127p-Isopropyltoluene <0.0037 <0.0030 <0.0029 <0.0029 <0.0030 <0.00290.0040 J<0.0032 <0.0297 <0.0035 <0.0032 <0.0031NENENEMethyl-tert-butyl ether<0.0028 <0.0023 <0.0022 <0.0022 <0.0023 <0.0022 <0.0022 <0.0024 <0.0226 <0.0027 <0.0025 <0.00230.0949220Methylene Chloride0.0576 C9,B<0.0166 <0.0163 <0.0164 <0.01690.0924 C9<0.0163 <0.01771.26 C90.0375 C90.0882 C9<0.01720.02558650n-Propylbenzene<0.0027 <0.0022 <0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0022 <0.00210.0039 J<0.0023 <0.0215 <0.0026 <0.0024 <0.00222.67805,100Tetrachloroethene<0.0024 <0.0019 <0.0019 <0.0019 <0.00190.0217<0.0019 <0.0020 <0.0191 <0.0023 <0.0021 <0.00200.00631782Toluene<0.00520.0069 0.0060<0.0041 <0.0043 <0.00410.0060 0.0046 J<0.0416 <0.0050 <0.0046 <0.00438.39909,700Trichloroethene<0.0060 <0.0049 <0.0048 <0.0048 <0.0050 <0.0048 <0.0048 <0.0052 <0.0486 <0.00580.0058 J<0.00500.0210.874.01,2,4-Trimethylbenzene<0.0045 <0.0036 <0.0035 <0.0036 <0.0037 <0.00350.0039 J<0.0038 <0.0358 <0.0043 <0.0039 <0.003712633701,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.0025 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0021 <0.00200.0045 J<0.0022 <0.0203 <0.0024 <0.0022 <0.00211156320Xylene (Total)<0.00430.0152<0.0034<0.0034 <0.0035 <0.00340.0159 0.0058 J<0.0344 <0.0041 <0.0038 <0.00369.9120530m&p-Xylene<0.00510.0087 J<0.0041 <0.0041 <0.0042 <0.00410.0092 J 0.0058 J<0.0413 <0.0049 <0.0045 <0.00439.8120500o-Xylene<0.00330.0065<0.0026 <0.0026 <0.0027 <0.00260.0067<0.0029 <0.0267 <0.0032 <0.0029 <0.00289.8140590Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2023. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values indicate compound exceed the Protection of Groundwater PSRG, but were below the Residential PSRG.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; NE = not establishedJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. C9 = Common laboratory contaminant. B = Compound was detected in the laboratory method blank. EXE-TS-5/DUP-07252/22/2023mg/kgBuilding 4 - Excavation E - Southern SidewallScreening Criteria Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Soil Removal/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Soil Removal Data Tables3/28/2023Table 5 (Page 2 of 5)Hart & Hickman, PCPost-Excavation Data
Table 5Summary of Post-Excavation Confirmation Soil Samples for Excavation EHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDEXE-SW-1E-2-A EXE-SW-2E-2 EXE-SW-3E-2 EXE-SW-4E EXE-SW-5E EXE-SW-1W EXE-SW-2W EXE-SW-3W EXE-SW-4WDepth (ft bgs)2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5 2-5Sample Date2/14/2023 2/14/2023 2/14/2023 2/10/2023 2/10/2023 2/7/2023 2/7/2023 2/9/2023 2/17/2023UnitsVOCs (8260D)Acetone<0.0466 <0.0482 <0.0427 <0.0435 <0.408 <0.0470 <0.0409 <0.07290.0510 J2514,000210,000Bromomethane<0.0225 <0.0233 <0.0206 <0.0210 <0.197 <0.0227 <0.01970.0355 J<0.01740.051.46.4tert-Butylbenzene<0.0026 <0.0027 <0.0024 <0.0024 <0.0226 <0.0026 <0.0023 <0.0040 <0.00203.11,60023,000Chloromethane<0.0061 <0.0063 <0.0056 <0.005736.9<0.0061 <0.00538.02<0.00470.01523992-Chlorotoluene<0.0026 <0.0027 <0.0024 <0.0024 <0.0225 <0.0026 <0.0023 <0.0040 <0.00202.03104,700cis-1,2-Dichloroethene0.0438 0.0294 0.0176 0.0102<0.02170.1140.138 0.0761 0.01680.411378Diisopropyl ether<0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0018 <0.0018 <0.0172 <0.0020 <0.0017 <0.0031 <0.00150.364802,000Ethylbenzene<0.0034 <0.0035 <0.0031 <0.0032 <0.02960.0049 J 0.0035 J<0.0053 <0.0026136.127p-Isopropyltoluene <0.0036 <0.0037 <0.0033 <0.0033 <0.0313 <0.0036 <0.0031 <0.0056 <0.0028NENENEMethyl-tert-butyl ether<0.0027 <0.0028 <0.0025 <0.0025 <0.0238 <0.00270.0193 0.0117<0.00210.0949220Methylene Chloride0.0624 C9,B0.0555 C9,B0.0991 C9,B0.0502 C91.50 C9<0.0201 <0.0174 <0.0311 <0.01540.02558650n-Propylbenzene<0.0026 <0.0027 <0.0024 <0.0024 <0.0226 <0.0026 <0.0023 <0.0040 <0.00202.67805,100Tetrachloroethene0.0173<0.00240.05480.0054 J<0.0201 <0.0023 <0.0020 <0.0036 <0.00180.00631782Toluene<0.0050 <0.0052 <0.0046 <0.0047 <0.0439 <0.0050 <0.0044 <0.0078 <0.00398.39909,700Trichloroethene0.0397<0.00610.0307<0.0055 <0.0513 <0.0059 <0.0051 <0.0092 <0.00450.0210.874.01,2,4-Trimethylbenzene<0.0043 <0.0045 <0.0039 <0.0040 <0.0378 <0.0043 <0.0038 <0.0067 <0.003312633701,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.0024 <0.0025 <0.0022 <0.0023 <0.0214 <0.0025 <0.0021 <0.0038 <0.00191156320Xylene (Total)<0.0041 <0.0043 <0.0038 <0.0039 <0.03620.0058 J<0.0036 <0.0065 <0.00329.9120530m&p-Xylene<0.0050 <0.0051 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.04350.0058 J<0.0044 <0.0078 <0.00389.8120500o-Xylene<0.0032 <0.0033 <0.0029 <0.0030 <0.0281 <0.0032 <0.0028 <0.0050 <0.00259.8140590Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2023. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values indicate compound exceed the Protection of Groundwater PSRG, but were below the Residential PSRG.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; NE = not establishedJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. C9 = Common laboratory contaminant. B = Compound was detected in the laboratory method blank. Building 4 - Excavation E - Eastern and Western Sidewallsmg/kgScreening Criteria Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Soil Removal/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Soil Removal Data Tables3/28/2023Table 5 (Page 3 of 5)Hart & Hickman, PCPost-Excavation Data
Table 5Summary of Post-Excavation Confirmation Soil Samples for Excavation EHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDEXE-B-1N EXE-B-2N EXE-B-3N EXE-B-4N EXE-B-5N EXE-B-6N-2 EXE-B-7N-2 EXE-B-8N EXE-B-2S EXE-B-2S-2 EXE-B-3S EXE-B-3S-2Depth (ft bgs)555557775555Sample Date2/17/2023 2/8/2023 2/8/2023 2/8/2023 2/8/2023 2/10/2023 2/14/2023 2/14/2023 2/8/2023 2/17/2023 2/9/2023 2/17/2023UnitsVOCs (8260D)Acetone<0.0384 <0.0385 <0.03810.107 J<0.0356 <0.0539 <0.0408 <0.04240.0434 J<0.0360<0.0447<0.039825 14,000 210,000Bromomethane<0.0185 <0.0186 <0.0184 <0.0241 <0.0172 <0.0260 <0.0197 <0.0205 <0.0183 <0.0174<0.0216<0.01920.051.46.4tert-Butylbenzene<0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0028 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0023 <0.0023 <0.0021 <0.0020<0.0025<0.00223.11,60023,000Chloromethane<0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0050 <0.0065 <0.00470.0154 J<0.0053 <0.0055 <0.0050 <0.00470.0130 J<0.00520.01523992-Chlorotoluene<0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0028 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0023 <0.0023 <0.0021 <0.0020<0.0025<0.00222.03104,700cis-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.00200.5310.0859 0.0392 0.0331<0.0029 <0.0022 <0.00230.273<0.00190.0902<0.00210.411378Diisopropyl ether<0.0016 <0.0016 <0.0016 <0.0021 <0.0015 <0.0023 <0.0017 <0.0018 <0.0016 <0.0015<0.0019<0.00170.364802,000Ethylbenzene<0.0028 <0.0028 <0.0028 <0.0036 <0.0026 <0.0039 <0.0030 <0.0031 <0.0028 <0.0026<0.0032<0.0029136.127p-Isopropyltoluene <0.0029 <0.0030 <0.0029 <0.0038 <0.0027 <0.0041 <0.0031 <0.0032 <0.0029 <0.0028<0.0034<0.0030NENENEMethyl-tert-butyl ether<0.0022 <0.0022 <0.0022 <0.0029 <0.00210.0135<0.0024 <0.00250.0083<0.0021<0.0026<0.00230.0949220Methylene Chloride<0.0164 <0.0164 <0.0163 <0.0213 <0.01520.0659 C90.0306 C9,B0.0456 C9,B0.0688 C9<0.01540.303 C9<0.01700.02558650n-Propylbenzene<0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0028 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0023 <0.0023 <0.0021 <0.0020<0.0025<0.00222.67805,100Tetrachloroethene<0.0019 <0.0019 <0.0019 <0.0025 <0.0018 <0.0027 <0.0020 <0.0021 <0.0019 <0.0018<0.0022<0.00200.00631782Toluene0.0043 J<0.0041 <0.0041 <0.0054 <0.0038 <0.0058 <0.0044 <0.0046 <0.0041 <0.0039<0.0048<0.00438.39909,700Trichloroethene<0.0048 <0.0048 <0.0048 <0.0063 <0.0045 <0.0068 <0.0051 <0.0053 <0.0048 <0.0045<0.0056<0.00500.0210.874.01,2,4-Trimethylbenzene<0.0036<0.0036 <0.0035 <0.0046 <0.0033 <0.0050 <0.0038 <0.0039 <0.00350.0038 J<0.0041<0.003712633701,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0026 <0.0019 <0.0028 <0.0021 <0.0022 <0.0020 <0.0019<0.0023<0.00211156320Xylene (Total)<0.0034 <0.0034 <0.0034 <0.0044 <0.0032 <0.0048 <0.0036 <0.0038 <0.00340.0048 J<0.0040<0.00359.9120530m&p-Xylene<0.0041 <0.0041 <0.0041 <0.0053 <0.0038 <0.0057 <0.0044 <0.0045 <0.00400.0048 J<0.0048<0.00429.8120500o-Xylene<0.0026 <0.0027 <0.0026 <0.0034 <0.0024 <0.0037 <0.0028 <0.0029 <0.0026 <0.0025<0.0031<0.00279.8140590Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2023. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values indicate compound exceed the Protection of Groundwater PSRG, but were below the Residential PSRG.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; NE = not establishedJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. C9 = Common laboratory contaminant. B = Compound was detected in the laboratory method blank. mg/kgBuilding 4 - Excavation E - Base Screening Criteria Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Soil Removal/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Soil Removal Data Tables3/28/2023Table 5 (Page 4 of 5)Hart & Hickman, PCPost-Excavation Data
Table 5Summary of Post-Excavation Confirmation Soil Samples for Excavation EHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDEXE-B-4S EXE-B-4S-2 EXE-B-5S EXE-B-5S-2 EXE-B-6S EXE-B-7S EXE-B-7S-2 EXE-B-8S EXE-B-8S-3 EXE-B-1W EXE-B-2W EXE-B-3WDepth (ft bgs)555555557555Sample Date2/9/2023 2/17/2023 2/6/2023 2/8/2023 2/6/2023 2/6/2023 2/13/2023 2/13/2023 2/14/2023 2/7/2023 2/7/2023 2/17/2023UnitsVOCs (8260D)Acetone<0.0447 <0.0408 <0.0363 <0.0358 <0.137 <0.0471 <0.0403 <0.0400 <0.0348 <0.04230.0745 J<0.037525 14,000 210,000Bromomethane<0.0216 <0.0197 <0.0175 <0.0173 <0.0663 <0.0227 <0.0195 <0.0193 <0.0168 <0.0204 <0.0192 <0.01810.051.46.4tert-Butylbenzene<0.0025 <0.0023 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0076 <0.0026 <0.0022 <0.0022 <0.0019 <0.0023 <0.0022 <0.00213.11,60023,000Chloromethane<0.0058 <0.0053 <0.0048 <0.004710.9<0.00620.0068 J<0.0052 <0.0046 <0.0055 <0.0052 <0.00490.01523992-Chlorotoluene<0.0025 <0.0022 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0076 <0.0026 <0.0022 <0.0022 <0.0019 <0.0023 <0.0022 <0.00212.03104,700cis-1,2-Dichloroethene0.0227<0.0022 <0.00190.0058<0.00730.0134 0.201<0.0021 <0.00190.6470.0789<0.00200.411378Diisopropyl ether<0.0019 <0.0017 <0.0015 <0.0015 <0.0058 <0.0020 <0.0017 <0.0017 <0.0015 <0.0018 <0.0017 <0.00160.364802,000Ethylbenzene<0.0032 <0.0030 <0.0026 <0.0026 <0.010 <0.0034 <0.0029 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.0031 <0.0029 <0.0027136.127p-Isopropyltoluene <0.0034 <0.0031 <0.0028 <0.0027 <0.0105 <0.0036 <0.0031 <0.0031 <0.0027 <0.0032 <0.0030 <0.0029NENENEMethyl-tert-butyl ether<0.0026 <0.0024 <0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0080 <0.0027 <0.0023 <0.0023 <0.0020 <0.00250.0125<0.00220.0949220Methylene Chloride<0.0191 <0.01740.183 C9,B0.092 C90.121 C90.108 C9,B0.0273 C9<0.0171 <0.0148 <0.01810.0563 C9<0.01600.02558650n-Propylbenzene<0.0025 <0.0023 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0076 <0.0026 <0.0022 <0.0022 <0.0019 <0.0023 <0.0022 <0.00212.67805,100Tetrachloroethene<0.0022 <0.0020 <0.0018 <0.0018 <0.0068 <0.0023 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0017 <0.0021 <0.0020 <0.00180.00631782Toluene<0.0048 <0.0044 <0.0039 <0.0038 <0.0148 <0.0051 <0.0043 <0.0043 <0.0037 <0.0045 <0.00430.0041 J8.39909,700Trichloroethene<0.0056 <0.0051 <0.0046 <0.0045 <0.0172 <0.0059 <0.0051 <0.0050 <0.0044 <0.0053 <0.0050 <0.00470.0210.874.01,2,4-Trimethylbenzene<0.00410.0038 J<0.0034 <0.0033 <0.0127 <0.0044 <0.0037 <0.0037 <0.0032 <0.0039 <0.00370.0042 J12633701,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.0023 <0.0021 <0.0019 <0.0019 <0.0072 <0.0025 <0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0018 <0.0022 <0.0021 <0.00201156320Xylene (Total)<0.00400.0127 J<0.00320.0041 J<0.0122 <0.0042 <0.0036 <0.0036 <0.0031 <0.0038 <0.00350.0079 J9.9120530m&p-Xylene<0.00480.0074 J<0.00390.0041 J<0.0146 <0.0050 <0.0043 <0.0043 <0.0037 <0.0045 <0.00420.0079 J9.8120500o-Xylene<0.00310.0052 J<0.0025 <0.0025 <0.0095 <0.0032 <0.0028 <0.0028 <0.0024 <0.0029 <0.0027 <0.00269.8140590Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2023. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values indicate compound exceed the Protection of Groundwater PSRG, but were below the Residential PSRG.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; NE = not establishedJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. C9 = Common laboratory contaminant. B = Compound was detected in the laboratory method blank. mg/kgScreening Criteria Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Building 4 - Excavation E - Basehttps://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Soil Removal/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Soil Removal Data Tables3/28/2023Table 5 (Page 5 of 5)Hart & Hickman, PCPost-Excavation Data
EXA-SW-E (3-6)
EXC-SW-E (3-6)
EXA-SW-N (3-6)
EXB-SW-S1-2 (3-6)
EXC-SW-S (3-6)
EXC-SW-W (3-6)EXB-SW-E2 (3-6)
EXD-SW-N6-B-2 (3-6)
EXB-SW-W1-B (3-6)
EXA-SW-S (3-6)
EXD-SW-N4 (3-6)
EXC-SW-N (3-6)
EXA-SW-W (3-6)
EXA-SW-E (0-3)
EXA-SW-N (3-6)
EXA-SW-W (3-6)
EXD-SW-N7 (3-6)
EXD-SW-S7 (3-6)
EXC-SW-S (3-6)
EXB-SW-E2-2 (3-6)EXC-SW-W (3-6)
EXB-SW-W1-A (3-6)
EXB-SW-W2 (3-6)
EXB-SW-S2-2 (3-6)
EXD-SW-S4 (3-6)
EXB-SW-S2-2 (3-6)
EXB-SW-W1-B (3-6)
EXB-SW-S1-2 (3-6)
EXD-SW-W2-2 (5-7)
EXD-SW-N3 (3-6)
EXB-SW-N1-2 (3-6)
EXD-SW-N5 (3-6)
EXB-SW-N1-2 (3-6)
EXD-SW-N3 (3-6)
EXD-SW-N2 (3-6)/EXD-SW-N2 (6-9)EXD-SW-N4 (3-6)
EXD-SW-E1 (3-6)
EXD-SW-N5 (3-6)
EXD-SW-E1 (3-6)
EXD-SW-S5 (3-6)
EXD-SW-E2 (3-6)
EXD-SW-S7 (3-6)
EXD-SW-S6 (3-6)EXD-SW-S6 (3-6)
EXD-SW-E2 (3-6)
EXD-SW-S5 (3-6)
EXD-SW-S4-2 (0-3)
EXD-SW-S3 (3-6)
EXD-SW-S2-B (3-6)
EXD-SW-S4 (3-6)EXD-SW-W2-2 (5-7)
EXD-SW-S1 (3-6)/EXD-SW-S1 (6-9)
EXD-SW-W1 (3-6)/EXD-SW-W1 (6-9)
EXD-SW-S2-B (3-6)
EXA-SW-S (3-6)
EXB-SW-W2 (3-6)
EXC-SW-N (3-6)
EXC-SW-E (3-6)EXC-B
EXB-SW-E1-2 (3-6)
EXB-SW-W1-A (3-6)
EXD-SW-N7 (3-6)
EXD-SW-S3 (3-6)
EXD-SW-N-C (3-6)
EXD-SW-N-B (3-6)
EXD-SW-W3 (3-6)EXD-SW-N6-A (3-6)
10'
EXD-TS-1 (5-7)
EXB-TN-N2 (5-7)
EXB-SW-N2-2 (3-6)
10'
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. ACO-002
DATE: 3-27-23
FIGURE NO. 3
HARRELSON FORD6500 SOUTH BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
POST-EXCAVATION CONFIRMATION SOIL
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP - BUILDING 3
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
LEGEND
EXCAVATION EXTENT
APPROXIMATE EXCAVATION DEPTH 3 FT
APPROXIMATE EXCAVATION DEPTH 7 FT
APPROXIMATE EXCAVATION DEPTH 9 FT
AREAS WITH DETECTABLE LEVELS 2) PCEAND/OR TCE ABOVE THE REMEDIAL GOALS
POST-EXCAVATION CONFIRMATION SOILSAMPLE LOCATION
APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF BUILDING
FOOTPRINT
BUILDING 3
EXD-SW-S1 3-6
PCE 
TCE 
EXD-SW-S1 6-9
PCE 
TCE 
EXD-TS-1 5-7
PCE <0.0017
TCE <0.0044
EXD-SW-N6-B-2 3-6
PCE 0.0042 J
TCE <0.0049
EXB-SW-N2-2 3-6
PCE 
TCE <0.0058
EXB-TN-N2 5-7
PCE 0.0037 J
TCE <0.0043
EXB-TN-N2 5-7
PCE 0.0037 J
TCE <0.0043
SAMPLE ID SAMPLE DEPTH (FT BGS)
CONCENTRATION(mg/kg)
CONSTITUENT
BUILDING 4
NOTES:
1. APPROXIMATE SAMPLE DEPTHS ARE SHOWN INPARENTHESES NEXT TO POST-EXCAVATIONCONFIRMATION SOIL SAMPLE IDs.
2.%2/' CONCENTRATIONS INDICATE AN EXCEEDANCE OFTHE PROTECTION OF GROUNDWATER PSRG
3. PCE = TETRACHLOROETHYLENETCE = TRICHLOROETHYLENE
PSRG - PRELIMINARY SOIL REMEDIATION GOALmg/kg = MILIGRAMS PER KILOGRAMFT BGS = FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE
4. J FLAG DENOTES ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION BETWEENLABORATORY REPORTING LIMIT AND METHOD
DETECTION LIMIT.
5. ONLY POST-EXCAVATION CONFIRMATION SOIL SAMPLESWITH DETECTABLE LEVELS OF PCE AND/OR TCE ARESHOWN WITH CONSTITUENT CONCENTRATION BOXES,WITH THE EXCEPTION OF TEST PIT SAMPLES COLLECTEDOUTSIDE THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT.
INSET 1" = 100'
EXCAVATION A EXCAVATION C
EXCAVATION B
EXCAVATION D
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Ardent - ACO\ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard\Brownfields\Additional Assessment\Figures\ACO-002 20230306.dwg, FIG 3 - BLDG 3, 3/28/2023 8:33:33 AM, kmckinneyEXA-SW-E (3-6)(;$6:(
E
Post-Excavation Data
EXE-SW-2E-2 (2-5)
EXE-SW-4E (2-5)
EXE-SW-5E (2-5)
EXE-SW-1S-B (2-5)EXE-SW-3S-A (2-5)
EXE-SW-5S-B (2-5)
EXE-SW-7S-2 (2-5)
EXE-SW-2S-B (2-5)EXE-SW-4S-A (2-5)EXE-SW-6S-2 (2-5)
EXE-SW-8N-B (2-5)EXE-SW-7N-3 (3-6)EXE-SW-5N-B (3-6)
EXE-SW-5N-A (3-6)
EXE-SW-4N (2-5)
EXE-SW-3N-C (2-5)
EXE-SW-3N-B (2-5)
EXE-SW-3N-A (2-5)
EXE-SW-2N (2-5)
EXE-SW-1N-C (2-5)
EXE-SW-1N-B (2-5)
EXE-SW-1N-A (2-5)
EXE-B-1N
EXE-SW-1W (2-5)
EXE-SW-2W (2-5)
EXE-SW-3W (2-5)
EXE-SW-4W (2-5)
EXE-B-1WEXE-B-2N EXE-B-3N EXE-B-4N EXE-B-5N EXE-B-6N-2 EXE-B-7N-2
EXE-B-2W
EXE-B-3W
EXE-B-2S
EXE-B-2S-2
EXE-B-3S
EXE-B-4S
EXE-B-5S EXE-B-8S-3
EXE-B-7S
EXE-B-6S
EXE-B-3S-2
EXE-B-4S-2
EXE-B-5S-2 EXE-B-8S
EXE-B-7S-2
EXE-B-8N
10'
14'14'
EXE-SW-3E-2 (2-5)
EXE-SW-8S (2-5)
EXE-TS-5 (2-5)EXE-TS-8 (2-5)
EXE-SW-1E-2-A (2-5)
EXE-TN-6 (2-5)
EXE-SW-6N-3 (3-6)
EXE-SW-1E-2-A 2-5
PCE 0.0173
TCE 0.0397
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. ACO-002
DATE: 3-27-23
FIGURE NO. 4
HARRELSON FORD6500 SOUTH BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE EXCAVATION EXTENT
APPROXIMATE EXCAVATION DEPTH 5 FT
APPROXIMATE EXCAVATION DEPTH 7 FT
EXCAVATION DEPTH 9 FT
AREAS WITH DETECTABLE LEVELS OF PCEAND/OR TCE ABOVE THE REMEDIAL GOALS
POST-EXCAVATION CONFIRMATION SOILSAMPLE LOCATION
APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF BUILDING
FOOTPRINT
FORMER TRENCH DRAIN AND OWS SYSTEMPIPING
OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
EXE-TS-5 2-5
PCE <0.0019
TCE <0.0048
EXE-SW-5S-B 2-5
PCE 0.0217
TCE <0.0048
EXE-TS-8 2-5
PCE <0.0020
TCE <0.0050
EXE-SW-8S 2-5
PCE <0.0021
TCE 0.0058 J
EXE-SW-4E 2-5
PCE 0.0054 J
TCE <0.0055
EXE-SW-3E-2 2-5
PCE 0.0548
TCE 0.0307
EXE-SW-1E-2-A 2-5
PCE 0.0173
TCE 0.0397
EXE-SW-6N-3 3-6
PCE <0.0020
TCE 0.0057 J
SAMPLE ID SAMPLE DEPTH (FT BGS)
CONCENTRATION(mg/kg)
CONSTITUENT
BUILDING 3
BUILDING 4
NOTES:
1. APPROXIMATE SAMPLE DEPTHS ARE SHOWN IN
PARENTHESES NEXT TO POST-EXCAVATIONCONFIRMATION SOIL SAMPLE IDs.
2.BOLD CONCENTRATIONS INDICATE AN EXCEEDANCE OFTHE PROTECTION OF GROUNDWATER PSRG
3. PCE = TETRACHLOROETHYLENETCE = TRICHLOROETHYLENEPSRG - PRELIMINARY SOIL REMEDIATION GOALmg/kg = MILIGRAMS PER KILOGRAMFT BGS = FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACEOWS = OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
4. J FLAG DENOTES ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION BETWEENLABORATORY REPORTING LIMIT AND METHOD
DETECTION LIMIT.
5. ONLY POST-EXCAVATION CONFIRMATION SOIL SAMPLESWITH DETECTABLE LEVELS OF PCE AND/OR TCE ARESHOWN WITH CONSTITUENT CONCENTRATION BOXES,WITH THE EXCEPTION OF TEST PIT SAMPLES COLLECTEDOUTSIDE THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT.
POST-EXCAVATION CONFIRMATION SOILSAMPLE LOCATION MAP - BUILDING 4
INSET 1" = 100'
EXE-TN-6 2-5
PCE <0.0021
TCE <0.0053
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Ardent - ACO\ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard\Brownfields\Additional Assessment\Figures\ACO-002 20230306.dwg, FIG 4 - BLDG 4, 3/28/2023 8:35:23 AM, kmckinneyEXCAVATION (

$3352;,0$7(/2&$7,212),17(5,25:$//


Post-Excavation Data

APPENDIX E
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED EMP DATED NOVEMBER 4, 2022
Via Email
November 4, 2022
NCDEQ – Division of Waste Management
Brownfields Program
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646
Attn: Mr. Bill Schmithorst, PG
Re: Environmental Management Plan
Harrelson Ford
6500 South Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 25046-21-060
H&H Project No. ACO-002
Dear Bill:
On behalf of TAC Harrelson Ford, LLC, enclosed is the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for the
Harrelson Ford property (Brownfields Project No. 25046-21-060) located in Charlotte, Mecklenburg
County for your review and approval. The enclosed EMP was prepared to conduct excavation and
removal of impacted soil at the Site. A separate EMP will be prepared and submitted for Site
redevelopment.
Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Hart & Hickman, PC
Ralph McGee, PG Haley Martin, PG
Project Manager Senior Project Geologist
Enclosures:
cc: Mr. Tyson Reilly, The Ardent Companies (Via Email)
Mr. Dave Franchina, McGuireWoods (Via Email)

CONTENTS

Completed EMP Template Form

Tables

Table 1A Summary of Organic Constituent Soil Analytical Data
Table 1B Summary of Metals Soil Analytical Data
Table 1C Summary of Soil Analytical Data
Table 2 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data
Table 3 Summary of Sub-Slab Vapor Analytical Data
Table 4 Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Data

Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Sample Location Map

1 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM 
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in 
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager. 

The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA).  Its purpose is to clarify 
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an 
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other 
environmental conditions.  The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and 
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory‐compliant 
decision‐making at the site.  As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP, 
including contingency planning for unknowns.  Consult your project manager if you have 
questions. 

Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all 
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any 
earthmoving or other development‐related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at 
the Brownfields Property, including demolition.  For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it 
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project, 
and approved by the Brownfields project manager.  Failure to comply with the requirements of 
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be 
cause for a reopener.   

The EMP is valid only for the scope of work described herein and must be updated to be 
applicable for new phases of redevelopment or after significant changes in applicable 
regulatory guidance.   

Voluntary Metrics Tab 
The NC Brownfields Program updates estimated capital investment (from the Brownfields
Property Application) and estimated jobs created (from the Brownfields Agreement) whenever
possible. As a voluntary measure, you may opt to complete the below information for capital
investment and jobs created as estimated by your final redevelopment plans for the Brownfields
Property:

1. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: Confidential; See
Brownfields Property Application
2. Estimated jobs created:
a. Construction Jobs:
b. Full Time Post-Redevelopment Jobs:

2 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
Table of Contents
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................... 1 
GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................ 4 
COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 4 
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ............................................................................... 5 
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS ........................................................................................................................ 5 
CONTAMINATED MEDIA ......................................................................................................................... 7 
PART 1. Soil ......................................................................................................................................... 8 
PART 2. GROUNDWATER .................................................................................................................. 18 
PART 3. SURFACE WATER .................................................................................................................. 20 
PART 4. SEDIMENT ............................................................................................................................ 20 
PART 5.  SOIL VAPOR ......................................................................................................................... 20 
PART 6.  SUB‐SLAB SOIL VAPOR ........................................................................................................ 21 
PART 7. INDOOR AIR ......................................................................................................................... 22 
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM ............................................................................................. 23 
CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials ..................... 23 
POST‐REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING ..................................................................................................... 25 
APPROVAL SIGNATURES ....................................................................................................................... 27 

3 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the 
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the 
EMP for review.  Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.   

☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has 
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager. 

☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project, 
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager. 

Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant 
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:      

☐ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if 
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted. 

☒ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for 
each media. 

☐ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis. 

☐ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain 
on site after construction grading. 

☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.). 

☐ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction. 

☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas, 
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment. 

☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media 
applicable to the proposed redevelopment. 

☐ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final. 

☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial 
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for 
brownfields approval. 

☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources, 
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property. 

4 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
☐A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property.  Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.
☐A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.
☒If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer.  The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.
GENERAL INFORMATION 
Date: 11/04/2022 Revision Date (if applicable): Click or tap to enter a 
date. 
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Harrelson Ford  
Brownfields Project Number: 25046‐21‐060 
Brownfields Property Address: 6500 South Boulevard, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County  
Brownfields Property Area (acres): The Brownfields property consists of one parcel totaling 
approximately 10.6 acres of land.  A Site location map is provided as Figure 1, and the Site and 
surrounding area are shown in Figure 2. 
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes   ☒ No 
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text. 
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes   ☒ No 
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text. 
COMMUNICATIONS 
A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers 
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water.  Additionally, a copy of the 
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities.  NOTE, THE EMP 
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE‐SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN. 
Prospective Developer (PD): TAC Harrelson Ford, LLC  
Contact Person: Tyson Reilly   
Phone Numbers:   Office: 806‐548‐4656  Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.  
Email: [e-mail]  
Contractor for PD:  RCI  

5 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
Contact Person:  Drew Weinstock   
Phone Numbers:   Office: Click or tap here to enter text. Mobile: 704‐301‐0241   
Email:       

Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC    
Contact Person: Ralph McGee, PG  
Phone Numbers:   Office: 704‐887‐4621  Mo
Email: [e-mail]   

Brownfields Program Project Manager:  Bill Schmithorst, PG  
Phone Numbers:   Office: 704‐223‐6549 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.   
Email: [e-mail]   

Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch, 
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):  
Brownfields Property Management Unit 
[e-mail] 

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM  

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept 
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task: 

On‐site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior        ☒ 

Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior       ☒

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously 
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours   ☒

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in 
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours  ☒ 

Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior         ☒

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment 
activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days     ☒ 

REDEVELOPMENT PLANS 

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply): 
☒Residential  ☐Recreational  ☐Institutional  ☒Commercial  ☒Office  ☒Retail  ☐Industrial 
☐Other specify: 

6 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
This Environmental Management Plan (EMP) has been prepared to conduct soil excavation and 
off‐site disposal of tetrachloroethene (PCE) and trichloroethene (TCE) contaminated soil identified 
below Building 3 and Building 4 (Figure 3) at the Site.  A Soil Removal Work Plan (Work Plan) to 
conduct the excavation and off‐site disposal was provided to DEQ on October 6, 2022.  

Proposed redevelopment of the Brownfields property includes razing the existing Site buildings 
and leveling the Site for construction of a townhome development.  A separate EMP for Site 
redevelopment activities will be prepared and submitted under a separate cover. 

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth‐moving activities 
at the site: 
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps) 
☒ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility 
lines, etc. 
☐ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors 

3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if 
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature): 
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building 
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:  
As discussed above, this EMP has been prepared to conduct soil excavation and off‐site disposal 
of PCE and TCE contaminated soil identified below Building 3 and Building 4.  A separate EMP for 
Site redevelopment activities will be prepared and submitted under a separate cover.  The future 
EMP for Site redevelopment will include redevelopment plans.  

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?: 
   ☐ Yes  ☒ No ☐ Unknown  
☐ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with 
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos 
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public 
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.  If available, please 
provide a copy of your demolition permit.  

Demolition of Site structures is not anticipated for removal and disposal of contaminated soil, 
although a limited amount of demolition activities will be conducted to allow for access to the soils 
to be removed pursuant to this EMP.  Please see the Work Plan for additional details.  However, 
the future redevelopment will require the demolition of Site structures.      

5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations? 
  ☐ Yes    ☒ No    ☐ Unknown  
☐  If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with 
applicable legal requirements.  If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion 
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.  

7 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  

6) Which category of risk‐based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the 
Brownfields Agreement?  Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall 
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes. 
☒ Residential   ☐ Non‐Residential or Industrial/Commercial 

7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule): 
a) Construction start date: 11/1/2022 

b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):  
 Excavation and off‐Site disposal of contaminated soil is anticipated to be completed in 
November 2022.   

c) Additional phases planned? ☒ Yes  ☐ No   

  If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:  
Start Date:  Click or tap to enter a date. 
  Planned Activity: 
Following removal and off‐Site disposal of impacted soil, Brownfields redevelopment 
activities will be conducted at the Site.  As indicated above, a separate EMP will be provided 
under a separate cover for the redevelopment activities.  

Start Date:  Click or tap to enter a date. 
  Planned Activity: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date. 
  Planned Activity: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: TBD

CONTAMINATED MEDIA 
Please fill out the sections below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas 
of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan.  Provide a figure overlaying new 
construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations. 

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property 
Part 1. Soil:……………………………………….……………. ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown 
Part 2. Groundwater:.……………………….……..……. ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown 
Part 3. Surface Water:.……………...……..…………… ☐  Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown 
Part 4. Sediment:.……………...……..…………………… ☐  Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown 
Part 5. Soil Vapor:…..…………...……..…………………. ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown 

8 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
Part 6. Sub‐Slab Soil Vapor:……...……..…………….. ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown 
Part 7. Indoor Air:...……..…………………………………. ☐  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☒ Unknown 

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data 
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.  

PART 1. Soil 
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants): 
Soil assessment activities were conducted at the Brownfields property in August 2021 and May 
2022.  A tabular summary of the soil sample laboratory analytical results collected at the 
Brownfields property is included as Table 1A through Table 1C and soil sample locations are shown 
in Figure 3.  A summary of the laboratory analytical results of the soil samples collected at the Site 
is provided below: 

Volatile Organic Compounds 
Soil sample analytical results indicate the presence of low‐level concentrations of volatile organic 
compounds (VOCs).  VOCs were not detected above Residential and Non‐Residential Preliminary 
Soil Remedial Goals (PSRGs).  However, VOCs were detected above their respective Protection of 
Groundwater (POG) PSRGs.  A summary of VOCs detected above POG PSRGs is provided below.  

 Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) was detected above the IHSB Protection of Groundwater (POG) PSRG 
of 0.0063 mg/kg in samples SB‐2, HL‐10, HL‐17, HL‐20, HL‐22, HL‐23, MP‐18, MP‐18A, MP‐18B. 
MP‐18C, and MP‐18D in Building 3 and in soil samples SB‐6, SB‐7, MP‐43, MP‐43B, and MP‐43C 
in Building 4 (Figure 3).  Concentrations of PCE detected above the IHSB POG PSRG ranged from 
0.014 mg/kg (HL‐17) to 1.3 mg/kg (MP‐43B).  

 Trichloroethylene (TCE) was also detected above the IHSB POG PSRG of 0.021 mg/kg in samples 
HL‐20 (0.93 mg/kg) and MP‐43B (0.031 mg/kg).  

 Naphthalene was detected in above the IHSB POG PSRG of 0.39 mg/kg in HL‐20 (0.55 mg/kg) 

 Methylene chloride was detected above the IHSB POG PSRG of 0.025 mg/kg in samples SB‐6 
(0.0748 mg/kg), SB‐7 (0.0596 mg/kg), and SB‐8 (0.0596 mg/kg). 

 No other VOCs were detected above IHSB POG PSRGs. 

Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds 
Soil sample analytical results indicate that trace levels of semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) 
were present in Site soils. The SVOC concentrations detected were below their respective DEQ 
Residential and Non‐Residential PSRGs. 1‐Methylnapthalene was detected above the POG PSRG 
of 0.11 mg/kg in sample HL‐17 (0.18 J mg/kg).  No other SVOCs were detected above PSRGs. 

9 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  

Metals 
Due to the natural presence of metals in soil, metals were detected above the laboratory method 
detection limits. The concentrations of metals detected in soil were generally within Site‐specific 
background concentrations.  However, selenium was detected slightly above the IHSB POG PSRG 
of 2.1 mg/kg and above the Site‐specific background range of 0.543 mg/kg in sample HL‐18 (2.98 
J mg/kg).   

Hexavalent chromium was not detected above laboratory method detection limits in background 
samples collected at the Site.  Hexavalent chromium was detected above the IHSB Residential 
PSRG of 0.31 mg/kg in samples HL‐18, HL‐23, SB‐1, SB‐2, SB‐4/SB‐DUP‐2, SB‐5, SB‐6, SB‐7, and MP‐
18.  Concentrations of hexavalent chromium detected above the Residential PSRG ranged from 
0.487 J mg/kg (HL‐18) to 1.47 mg/kg (MP‐18).  Concentrations of hexavalent chromium detected 
above the Residential PSRG generally correlate with the locations of former in‐ground lifts, trench 
drains associated with the OWS system, former wash bay floor drain, and near the former auto 
repair operations on the northern side of Building 3.  

The remaining metal concentrations detected were within background ranges and/or below IHSB 
PSRGs.  

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons ‐ Diesel Range Organics 
Total petroleum hydrocarbons ‐ diesel range organics (TPH‐DRO) concentrations were detected 
above the DEQ UST Section Action Level of 100 mg/kg in samples HL‐17, HL‐18, HL‐20, HL‐22, and 
HL‐23/SB‐DUP‐1.  Concentrations of TPH‐DRO detected above the DEQ UST Action Level ranged 
from 107 mg/kg (HL‐22) to 2,780 (HL‐17). 

Polychlorinated Biphenyls 
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were not detected in the Brownfields soil assessment activities 
at concentrations above the DEQ PSRGs in soil samples collected at the Site. 

2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet): 
Compounds were detected in soil above the POG PSRG at depths ranging from 0 ft to 1 ft below 
ground surface (bgs) to 8 ft to 10 ft bgs.  

3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet): 
Not applicable 

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet): 
As discussed in the Work Plan, soil excavation will be conducted at the Site to remove PCE and 
TCE impacts.  It is anticipated that the maximum excavation depth will be 10 ft bgs based upon 
previous assessment conducted at the Site and depth to groundwater.  

5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan): 

10 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
As indicated in the Work Plan, field screening methods in conjunction with a mobile laboratory 
will be utilized to determine the lateral and vertical extent of the excavation areas. The volume 
of soil to be excavated is to be determined (TBD), but is estimated that 6,000 cubic yards of soil 
will be excavated.   

6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:             
It is anticipated that the excavated soil will be impacted. As indicated above the volume of soil is 
TBD, but it is estimated that 6,000 cubic yards of soil will be excavated.  

7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:   
It is anticipated that the excavated soil will be disposed of off‐site. As indicated above the 
volume of soil is TBD, but it is estimated that 6,000 cubic yards of soil will be excavated.  Soil will 
be disposed of at Republic Services soil waste landfill in Concord, North Carolina.  

Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL 
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields 
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please 
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are 
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).   

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:  
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous 
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31‐261.35?....................................... ☐Yes   ☒No 
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes 
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed). 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained‐Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the 
North Carolina Contained‐In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes   ☐ No 

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS 
THE CONTAINED‐OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA 
CONTAINED‐IN POLICY THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE 
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND 
REGULATIONS.    
c)  Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes   ☒ No 
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results). 
☐ Ignitability  Click or tap here to enter text.               
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text. 

11 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual 
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory 
TCLP standard)   
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☒ If no, explain rationale:  
Laboratory analysis of soil samples collected during previous assessment 
activities did not identify compound concentrations at characteristically 
hazardous levels or levels which exceed TCLP criteria using the Rule of 20. 

d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE 
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE 
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS. 

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in 
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite): 
      ☒ Preliminary Health‐Based Residential SRGs  
      ☐ Preliminary Health‐Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs  
           ☐ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only) 
    ☒ Site‐specific risk‐based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for 
determination/explanation.  
For the proposed soil excavation activities that are the subject of this EMP, soil impacted 
with PCE and TCE will be removed to the extent required by the Work Plan.  Soil disposition 
decisions for the redevelopment following the soil excavation will be made based‐upon the 
Residential PSRG.  
Additional comments:  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary, 
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of 
same.   Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.      
☐ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager 
☐ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map 
to Brownfields Project Manager once known 
☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.  
Provide description of material:  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

12 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
☐ Manage soil under impervious cap ☐  or clean fill ☐  
☐ Describe cap or fill:  

☐ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re‐recorded if 
actions are Post‐Recordation).         
☐ GPS the location and provide site map with final location. 
☒ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:  

4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and 
management of site soils: 
Management of fugitive dust from site 
☒ Yes, describe the method will include: 
The proposed excavation activities will occur inside Building 3 and Building 4.  As discussed 
in the Work Plan, soil will be direct loaded onto trucks for off‐site disposal, and it is not 
anticipated that impacted soil will be stockpiled outside the buildings.  In the event 
excavated soil is stockpiled in an exterior location, the remedial  contractor will take into 
account conditions such as wind speed, wind direction, and moisture content of soil during 
stockpiling activities to minimize dust generation.  Particular attention will be paid by 
contractors to implement dust control measures as needed based on Site and atmospheric 
conditions and may be controlled using water application or plastic cover. 

☐ No, explain rationale: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Field Screening of site soil 
☒ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting 
field screening:  
During soil excavation, a photo‐ionization detector will be utilized to screen the breathing 
zone and work area for elevated levels for organic vapors.   

☐ No, explain rationale:    
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Soil Sample Collection 
☒ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in‐situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):  
As discussed in the Soil Excavation Work Plan, post‐excavation confirmation samples for 
laboratory analysis from the sidewalls and base of the excavations will be collected.  Please 
note based on the depth to groundwater, it is not anticipated that samples will be collected 
at a depth of greater than 9 ft bgs.  

Soil sample aliquots collected from Building 3 and Building 4 will be collected from shallow 
Soil generated as part of the soil excavation activities described in the EMP will not be reused on‐Site.  

13 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
(0‐3 ft bgs), middle (3‐6 ft bgs), and deeper (6‐9 ft bgs) depth intervals at locations every 10 
linear feet of excavation sidewall and base extents.  The shallow, middle, and deep aliquot 
samples will be field screened for the presence of volatile organic vapors using a calibrated 
PID and hand‐held gas chromatograph.  The soil sample exhibiting the highest likelihood 
for impacts based on field screening results will be collected for laboratory analysis.  If field 
screening results do not indicate the potential for impact in sample aliquots collected from 
a sample location, then the middle depth (3‐6 ft bgs) aliquot will be selected for laboratory 
analysis.   

Soil samples selected for laboratory analysis will be placed in dedicated laboratory‐supplied 
sample containers, labeled with the sample identification, date, and requested analysis, 
and placed in a laboratory‐supplied cooler with ice.  The samples will be submitted to a 
North Carolina‐certified laboratory under standard chain of custody protocols for 
laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260.  For quality control and quality assurance 
purposes, one duplicate soil sample will be collected for every 20 soil samples collected and 
submitted for laboratory analysis for the same parameters as the parent soil sample. 

Based on the results of the confirmation sidewall and base soil samples, H&H will determine 
if over‐excavation activities are warranted.  In the event that confirmation sample analytical 
results indicate the PCE or TCE are present above concentrations described in the Work 
Plan, additional excavation activities will be completed in isolated areas as determined by 
analytical results.  After additional excavation activities are completed, another round of 
confirmation soil samples will be collected in accordance with the methodologies described 
above and as described in the Work Plan.   

☐ No, explain rationale:  

If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes: 
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
☐ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium 
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, 
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 

14 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  

☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted 
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP.  Stockpile methodology should provide erosion 
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, 
and preventing contaminated runoff.  Explain any variances or provide additional details as 
needed: 

☐ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or 
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes 
below (Check all that apply): 
☐ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
☐ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, 
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):    
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent 
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):  

Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil 
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.  
Samples should be collected from 0‐2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs 
which should be taken from 1‐2 ft below ground surface.  Alternatively, indicate if a work 
plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover. 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☒ If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale: 
Final grade sampling is not appliable to this phase of work.  A scope of work for final 
grade sampling will be provided in the future redevelopment EMP  

Part 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL 

NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL 
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM.  According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting 
As discussed above, it is anticipated that excavated soil will be direct loaded onto trucks for transport 
and disposal.  If soil is stockpiled on‐site in an exterior location, soil will be stockpiled in accordance 
with Figure 1 of the EMP.   

15 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written 
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided 
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property 
owner.” 

Requirements for importing fill: 

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☒ Yes  ☐ No  ☐ Unknown 

2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?  
Once post‐excavation laboratory analytical results meet the criteria outlined above, the 
excavations will be backfilled with clean fill.  The clean fill will be sourced from a DEQ‐approved 
facility.  Alternatively, the excavations may be backfilled with soil from other portions of the Site 
that is not impacted.  The volume of soil needed for import is dependent on the excavation 
extents.  As such, the volume of soil import needed is TBD. 

3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range 
of depths, please list the range.) 
The range of fill depth for the soil excavation will be determined based upon the extent of the 
excavation.  However, it is anticipated fill will be placed at depths of 2 ft bgs to 10 ft bgs. 

4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns, 
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history: 
As indicated above, import fill will be sourced from a DEQ‐approved facility.   

5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill 
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be 
approved for use at the Brownfields property. 

6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples.  (Check all that apply): 
☐ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
☐ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, 
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):    
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

16 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent 
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):  

7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan 
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval.  Attach specific location maps for in‐situ 
borrow sites.  If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought 
onto the Brownfields Property. 
The PD will follow the procedures outlined below to demonstrate import soil meets acceptable 
standards applicable to the Site, if necessary. 

The PD plans to import fill material from Vulcan Materials Company quarry located near Pineville, 
NC, or from the Martin Marietta quarry located on Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, NC.  Accordingly, 
no samples of the import material will be collected as adequate analytical data is available in the 
DEQ Brownfields database to demonstrate material from these facilities is suitable for use as 
structural fill at a Brownfields property. 

If fill soil is obtained from an off‐Site property that is not a Brownfields pre‐approved quarry or is 
recycled material from the Vulcan Materials Company quarry or the Martin Marietta quarries, then 
soil samples will be collected for laboratory analyses at a general rate of 1 sample per 1,000 cubic 
yards.  Representative composite soil samples (no less than 3 aliquot soil samples) will be collected 
for VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, and RCRA metals plus hexavalent 
chromium by EPA Methods 6020/7199.  The VOC sample would be a grab sample from the aliquot 
with the highest field screening reading.  DEQ approval of the fill soils will be obtained prior to 
transporting import soil to the Site. 

Imported fill soil laboratory analytical results will not exceed DEQ Residential PSRGs, DWM Risk 
Calculator risk thresholds, or established background metals concentrations.   

Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL 

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE 
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM.  FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS 
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM, 
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO 
ENFORCEMENT.  JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN 
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES.  Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for 
additional details.  

1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the 
proposed export actions.  Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will 
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of 
export and sampling results included. 
As discussed in the Work Plan, soil generated during the excavation activities will be direct 

17 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
loaded onto trucks for off‐Site disposal at Republic Services soil waste landfill in Concord, North 
Carolina.  Based upon previous assessment conducted the Site, excavated soil is anticipated to be 
primarily impacted with PCE above POG PSRGs. The extent of the excavations and volume of soil 
removed will be determined in the field utilizing field screening methods, mobile laboratory, and 
confirmation sampling.  It estimated that approximately 6,000 cubic yards of soil will be 
excavated and disposed of off‐site.  

2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?  
☒ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by 
landfill) 
☐ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be 
determined by the accepting Landfill;  
☐ Landfarm or other treatment facility  
☐ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property – determination that a 
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or 
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase 
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields 
property, and that a record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of 
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields.  Please provide additional details below.  
☐ Use as Beneficial Fill off‐site at a non‐Brownfields Property ‐ Please provide 
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material.  This will 
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section.  Additional information is 
provided in IR 15.  Please provide additional details below.  

3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide 
details related to the proposed plans). 

Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES 

☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill 
(Preferred) 

☐ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a 
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they 
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original 
depth from which it was excavated. 

☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, 
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants? 
☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials or provide the results of this evaluation in the 
Vapor Mitigation Plan. Note that if vapor mitigation is planned for site buildings, utility 
corridors will need to be evaluated as part of mitigation designs: 

18 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  

☒ If no, include rationale here: 
Utility trenches will not be installed during this phase of the project. 

☐ Unknown, details to be provided in the Vapor Mitigation Plan for site buildings 

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:  

PART 2. GROUNDWATER  

1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property? 
During previously completed groundwater assessment activities, the depth to groundwater was 
measured at depths ranging from approximately 9.5 ft bgs in the eastern portion of the 
Brownfields property to approximately 17 ft bgs at higher topographic elevations located in the 
southern portion of the Brownfields property.  

2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☐onsite  ☒offsite   ☐both or ☐unknown 
sources?  Describe source(s):  
Previous groundwater assessment at the Brownfields property included collection of six (6) 
groundwater samples for laboratory analysis. A tabular summary of groundwater sample 
laboratory analytical results is included as Table 2. A brief summary of the groundwater 
assessment results is provided below. 

VOCs 
PCE was detected above the NCAC 15A 2L Groundwater Standard (2L Standard) of 0.7 µg/L in 
sample TMW‐6/TMW‐DUP (2.4 µg/L / 2.5 µg/L), but below the IHSB Residential Vapor Intrusion 
Groundwater Screening Level (GWSL).  No other VOCs were detected above 2L Standards or IHSB 
GWSLs.  The location of TMW‐6 is shown in Figure 3.  

SVOCs 
SVOCs were not detected above 2L Standards.  

Metals 
Groundwater analytical results indicate that arsenic, barium, chromium, and lead were detected 
at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the 2L Standards.  

3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?  
Shallow groundwater is expected to mimic surface topography which slopes generally east. 

4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?   
☒Yes    ☐No  
If yes, describe these activities: 
Shallow groundwater may be encountered during excavation activities.  If groundwater is 

19 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
encountered during excavation activities, the procedures outlined below will be implemented.   

Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered 
during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent 
management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or 
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or 
sampling procedures).  
Based on previous assessment activities, contractors will be made aware of areas at the Site 
where groundwater is impacted and an environmental professional will be contacted to 
conduct safety screening if groundwater is encountered in these predetermined areas.  Should 
groundwater be encountered outside of areas of known impacts, the contractor will contact an 
environmental professional to observe conditions to determine if there are impacts that may 
pose a potential risk to workers.   

Appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken if groundwater gathers in an open 
excavation within an area determined to be impacted during construction activities.  The 
accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent time for dissipation 
does not disrupt the excavation schedule or be used on the Brownfields property for dust 
control purposes.  Should the time needed for natural dissipation of accumulated water be 
deemed inadequate, an environmental professional will be contacted and the water will be 
tested and disposed off‐Site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not 
impacted above DEQ surface water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and 
State regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control. 

5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☐Yes   ☒No    
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other 
agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes   ☐No  

6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously 
unidentified wells.   
☐ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations.  It 
is the Brownfields Program’s intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as 
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring 
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.   
☐ Location of existing monitoring wells marked 
☐ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance  
☒ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further 
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for 
abandonment is given. 

7) Please provide additional details as needed:   

The PD is not aware of existing monitoring wells located on the Brownfields property.  The DEQ will be 
notified if newly identified monitoring wells are found on the Brownfields property. 

20 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not 
permissible.  If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD 
be responsible for replacement of the well.   
PART 3. SURFACE WATER 
1) Is surface water present at the property?  ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown 
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property. 
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes  ☐ No 
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment 
activities?    ☐ Yes  ☐ No 
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment 
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of 
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run‐off, stormwater impacts): 
Surface water is not present at the property.  The proposed excavation will be conducted inside 
Building 3 and Building 4. Therefore, it is not anticipated that surface water will enter open 
excavations. 

PART 4. SEDIMENT 

1) Are sediment sources present on the property?  ☐ Yes  ☒ No 

2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes  ☐ No ☐ Unknown 

3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment 
activities?   ☐ Yes ☒ No 

4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property. 

5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance): 
As indicated above, the proposed excavation activities will be conducted inside Building 3 and 
Building 4.   

PART 5.  SOIL VAPOR 

1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the 
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media: 
IHSB Residential Screening Levels: 
Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No  ☐ Unknown 
Groundwater:.….☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown 
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels: 
Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 
Groundwater:…..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown 

21 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site 
screening levels.  
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?  

4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities? 

  ☒ Yes  ☐ No ☐ Unknown  In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during 
redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list 
activities for management of such contact:  
As noted above, appropriate safety screening will be performed to protect workers during sub‐
grade excavation activities.  Safety screening activities include monitoring the worker breathing 
zone with a calibrated photoionization detector or similar instrument.  If safety screening results 
indicate further action is warranted, an environmental professional will monitor the work zone 
and determine if engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) are warranted.   

PART 6.  SUB‐SLAB SOIL VAPOR 
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the 
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in sub‐slab soil vapor: 
IHSB Residential Screening Levels: 
Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No  ☐ Unknown 
Groundwater:.….☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown 
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels: 
Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 
Groundwater:…..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown   
2) If data indicate that sub‐slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map 
showing the location of these exceedances. 
3) At what depth(s) is sub‐slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☒0‐6 inches ☐Other, please 
describe:   
A total of ten sub‐slab soil gas samples were collected inside Building 3 and Building 4. The sub‐slab 
vapor sample locations are shown in Figure 5 and a tabular summary of the laboratory analytical 
Six soil gas samples were collected in the vicinity of in Building 3 and Building 4 (SG‐2, SG‐3, SG‐8, SG‐
12, SG‐13 and SG‐16)  are shown in Figure 3 and a tabular summary of the laboratory analytical data is 
provided in Table 3.  

Compounds detected above their respective Division of Waste Management (DWM) Residential Soil 
Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) in the soil gas samples collected in the vicinity of Building 3 and Building 
4 include: 1,1,2,2‐ tetrachloroethane, benzene, bromodichloromethane, chloroform, methyl‐tert butyl 
ether, and naphthalene.  Chloroform was also detected above the DWM Non‐Residential SGSLs in the 
soil gas samples collected in the vicinity of Building 3 and Building 4.  

22 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
data is provided in Table 4.  

Compounds detected above their respective DWM Residential SGSLs in the sub‐slab soil gas 
samples included 1,3‐butadiene, benzene, ethylbenzene, PCE, TCE, and vinyl chloride.  PCE, TCE, 
and vinyl chloride were also detected above their respective DWM Non‐Residential SGSLs in the 
sub‐slab soil gas samples collected inside Building 3 and Building 4.  

As discussed in the Work Plan, results of the recent field screening survey, sub‐slab soil gas, soil, 
and groundwater sampling activities confirm the conceptual Site models for Building 3 and Building 
4 and indicate that contributions of chlorinated compound concentrations detected in soil gas are 
attributable to soil impacts below the Site buildings.  As discussed in the Work Plan, the PD has 
proposed removal of PCE and TCE impacted soil from below Building 3 and Building 4 . 

4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub‐slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment 
activities? ☒ Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Unknown 

☐ If no, include rationale here: 

5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such contact 
As noted above, appropriate safety screening will be performed to protect workers during sub‐
grade excavation activities.  Safety screening activities include monitoring the worker breathing 
zone with a calibrated photoionization detector or similar instrument.  If safety screening results 
indicate further action is warranted, an environmental professional will monitor the work zone 
and determine if engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) are warranted.   

PART 7. INDOOR AIR 

1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Unknown 
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels. 
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk‐based screening levels will 
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated 
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes   ☐ No   ☒ Unknown 

☒ If no, include rationale here: 
No indoor air samples have been collected within the existing Site building.  The Site building and 
all other on‐Site features will be razed as part of the proposed redevelopment.  An EMP for 
future redevelopment will be submitted under a separate cover.  
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such contact: 
As noted above, appropriate safety screening will be performed to protect workers during sub‐grade 
excavation activities.  Safety screening activities include monitoring the worker breathing zone with a 

23 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  

VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM 
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property? 
☒ Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Unknown 

☐ If no or unknown, include rationale here as well as plans for pre‐occupancy sampling, as 
necessary: 

If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☒ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately   
If submitted separately provide date:  
The PD intends to install a DEQ Brownfields Program approved passive vapor intrusion mitigation 
system designed by a North Carolina licensed Professional Engineer during construction of the 
proposed apartment building.  The vapor intrusion mitigation plan will be submitted under 
separate cover.  

VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer 

If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:  

Note that approval of this EMP does not imply approval with any vapor intrusion mitigation land 
use restrictions or requirements of the recorded or draft Brownfields Agreement and that 
separate approval of mitigation measures will be required.  

CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials 

In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown 
potential new sources of contamination.   During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon 
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.  
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other 
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of 
contamination are discovered.  These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this 
EMP.   

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site 
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be 
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site‐specific factors.  Samples will generally be 
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.   

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases: 
calibrated photoionization detector or similar instrument.  If safety screening results indicate further 
action is warranted, an environmental professional will monitor the work zone and determine if 
engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) are warranted.   

24 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and 
silver) 
EPA Methods 6020/7471 

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.) 
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should 
be conducted, even if not listed here.  
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199 

Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly 
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties. 
It is anticipated that former hydraulic lift components may be removed as part of the proposed soil 
excavation activities.  However, during excavation activities contractors may encounter previously 
unidentified sub‐surface environmental conditions (i.e., tanks, drums, etc.) that if encountered, will 
require management.  Prior to beginning Site work, H&H notify the redevelopment contractors to 
discuss known conditions and the DEQ approved EMP.  The discussion will include reviewing various 
scenarios when it would be appropriate and necessary to notify H&H and take additional actions.  

In the event that such conditions are encountered during soil excavation, the environmental actions 
noted below will be used to direct environmental actions to be taken during these activities and 
sampling data will be provided to DEQ. 

Underground Storage Tanks:  
In the event a UST or impacts associated with a UST release are discovered at the Site during 
redevelopment activities, the UST and/or UST related impacts will be addressed through the 
Brownfields Program.  DEQ Brownfields will be notified within 48‐hours of discovery of the UST. 

If a UST is encountered, the UST will be removed, if possible, and the UST will be transported off‐Site 
for disposal at a suitable facility.  If the UST contains residual fluids, the fluids will be sampled for 
VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals and transported off‐Site for disposal at a suitable facility based on the 
laboratory analytical results prior to removing the UST from the ground.  If a UST is encountered that 
cannot be removed or does not require removal for geotechnical or future construction purposes, it 
may be abandoned in‐place with prior DEQ approval and excavation activities will proceed.  Where 
appropriate, the bottom of the UST may be penetrated before abandonment to prevent fluid 
accumulation.  Impacted soil in the vicinity of the UST will be managed in accordance with the 
Managing On‐Site Soil section outlined above in the EMP. 

25 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  

Sub‐Grade Feature/Pit: 
As indicated above, it is anticipated that former hydraulic lift components may be removed as part 
of the proposed soil excavation activities. However, if a previously unidentified sub‐grade feature or 
pit is encountered and does not require removal for geotechnical or future construction purposes, it 
will be filled with soil or suitable fill and excavation will proceed.  Where appropriate, the bottom 
may be penetrated before back filling to prevent fluid accumulation.  If the pit has waste in it, the 
waste will be set aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste disposal purposes for TCLP 
VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, and TCLP metals and disposed off‐Site at a permitted facility or the waste will be 
managed in accordance with the Managing On‐Site Soil section outlined above in the EMP, 
whichever is most applicable based on the type of waste present.  If the pit must be removed and 
the observed waste characteristics indicate the concrete may potentially be contaminated to a 
significant degree, the concrete will be sampled and analyzed by methods specified by the disposal 
facility. 

Buried Waste Material – Note that if buried waste, non‐native fill, or any obviously filled materials 
is encountered, the DEQ Brownfields Program must be notified to determine if investigation of 
landfill gases is required: 
If excavation into buried wastes or previously unidentified significantly impacted soil occurs, the 
contractor is instructed to stop work in that location and notify the environmental consultant.  The 
environmental consultant will review the materials and collect samples, if warranted.  Confirmation 
sampling will be conducted at representative locations in the base and the sidewalls of the 
excavation after the waste or significantly impacted soil is removed.  The confirmation samples will 
be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals.  Areas of suspected contaminated soil that remain 
at the Site after excavation is complete above the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs will be managed 
pursuant to this plan. 

Re‐Use of Impacted Soils On‐Site: 
Please refer to the description outlined in the Managing On‐Site Soil section (Part 1A) of the EMP 
above.   

If unknown, impacted soil is identified on‐site, management on‐site can be considered after the 
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields 
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on‐site.  

If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as 
needed below: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

POST‐REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING 

☒  Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the 
project.  If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be 

26 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one‐year anniversary of the effective date of 
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager).  These reports will be required for as long as 
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final 
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of 
redevelopment.  Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary 
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 1/31/2023  

The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment‐related activities since the last 
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:  
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;   
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;  
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of 
environmental media;  
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and 
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed 
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and  
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example, 
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required 
manifests shall be included). 

☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment 
Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement. 

28 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  

Tables
Table 1ASummary of Organic Constituent Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDHL-1 HL-2 HL-3 HL-4 HL-5 HL-6 HL-7 HL-8 HL-9 HL-10 HL-11 HL-12 HL-13 HL-14Depth (ft bgs)Sample DateUnitsTPH (8015C)DRO (C10-C28)<3.6 <3.8 <3.7 <4.14.1 J 4.5 J<3.94.9 J<3.81,3104.3 J<3.7 <3.710.2 ---- --100PCBs (8082A)ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ---- ----VOCs (8260D)AcetoneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.35NA NA NA NA2512,000 140,000--2-Butanone (MEK)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.031 NA NA NA NA175,500 40,000--n-ButylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.12NA NA NA NA4.5780 12,000--sec-ButylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0028 NA NA NA NA4.11,600 23,000--ChloroformNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0039 NA NA NA NA0.390.340 1.5--1,1-DichloroethaneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.0035 JNA NA NA NA0.0343.8 17--cis-1,2-DichloretheneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0022 NA NA NA NA0.4131 470--EthylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.042NA NA NA NA13627--Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0022 NA NA NA NA2.3410 2,100--p-IsopropyltolueneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0031 NA NA NA NANENE NE--Methylene ChlorideNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.017 NA NA NA NA0.02558 650--Methyl-tert-butyl etherNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0024 NA NA NA NA0.0949 220--NaphthaleneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.052NA NA NA NA0.392.1 8.8--n-PropylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0023 NA NA NA NA2.3780.0 5,100.0--TetrachloroetheneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.14NA NA NA NA0.006317 82--TolueneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.039NA NA NA NA8.3990 9,700--TrichloroetheneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.012NA NA NA NA0.0210.87 4--1,2,4-TrimethylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.38NA NA NA NA1263 430--1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.17NA NA NA NA1156 320--Xylene (Total)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.25NA NA NA NA9.9120 530--SVOCs (8270E)Di-n-butylphthalateNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.31 JNA NA NA NA351,300 16,000--bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.15 NA NA NA NA1439 160--1-MethylnaphthaleneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.13 NA NA NA NA0.1118 73--2-MethylnaphthaleneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.15 NA NA NA NA3.148 600--PhenanthreneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.12 NA NA NA NANENE NE--Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated July 2022. 2) DEQ Division of Waste Management Underground Storage Tank (UST) Section Action Level (December 2013).Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit. EPA laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the IHSB Protection of Groundwater PSRG or UST Action Level. VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; TPH = total petroleum hydrocarbons; DRO = diesel range organics NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NE = no established standard; BDL = below laboratory method detection limits; OWS = oil/water separatorJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. mg/kgFormer In-Ground Hydraulic Lifts8-108/3/2021Protection of Groundwater(1)Screening Criteria Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Action Level (2)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Soil/Data Tables_JRL9/23/2022Table 1A (Page 1 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1ASummary of Organic Constituent Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDHL-15 HL-16 HL-17 HL-18 HL-19 HL-20 HL-21 HL-22 HL-24Depth (ft bgs)Sample Date8/4/2021UnitsTPH (8015C)DRO (C10-C28)<3.7 <3.72,780 338<4.1413<4.2107 874 896<4.7---- --100PCBs (8082A)ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL--------VOCs (8260D)AcetoneNA NA <0.035 <0.051 NA <0.057 NA <0.0440.18 0.20NA2512,000 140,000--2-Butanone (MEK)NA NA <0.026 <0.038 NA <0.042 NA <0.0330.13 0.15NA175,500 40,000--n-ButylbenzeneNA NA0.49<0.0037 NA0.0056 JNA <0.0027 <0.0029 <0.0027 NA4.5780 12,000--sec-ButylbenzeneNA NA0.32 0.0052 JNA <0.0039 NA <0.0030 <0.0027 <0.0025 NA4.11,600 23,000--ChloroformNA NA <0.0033 <0.0048 NA <0.0054 NA0.0056 J<0.0037 <0.0034 NA0.390.340 1.5--1,1-DichloroethaneNA NA <0.0023 <0.0033 NA <0.0036 NA <0.0028 <0.0025 <0.0023 NA0.0343.8 17--cis-1,2-DichloretheneNA NA0.0077 0.046NA <0.0030 NA0.0081<0.0021 <0.0019 NA0.4131 470--EthylbenzeneNA NA0.032<0.0037 NA0.036NA <0.0032 <0.0028 <0.0026 NA13627--Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)NA NA0.063<0.0027 NA <0.0030 NA <0.0023 <0.0021 <0.0019 NA2.3410 2,100--p-IsopropyltolueneNA NA0.60<0.0039 NA <0.0043 NA <0.0033 <0.0030 <0.0028 NANENE NE--Methylene ChlorideNA NA <0.015 <0.022 NA <0.024 NA <0.019 <0.17 <0.015 NA0.02558 650--Methyl-tert-butyl etherNA NA <0.0021 <0.0030 NA <0.0033 NA <0.0025 <0.0023 <0.0021 NA0.0949 220--NaphthaleneNA NA0.11<0.0042 NA0.55NA0.015<0.00320.0055 JNA0.392.1 8.8--n-PropylbenzeneNA NA0.19<0.0028 NA <0.0031 NA <0.0024 <0.0022 <0.0020 NA2.3780.05,100.0--TetrachloroetheneNA NA0.014<0.0025 NA0.93NA0.018 0.085 0.082NA0.00631782--TolueneNA NA0.012 0.0082NA0.026NA0.012 0.0050 J 0.0043 JNA8.39909,700--TrichloroetheneNA NA <0.0014 <0.0020 NA0.041NA <0.0018 <0.0016 <0.0015 NA0.0210.874--1,2,4-TrimethylbenzeneNA NA1.2<0.0022 NA0.73NA0.022 0.025 0.024NA1263430--1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneNA NA0.51<0.0027 NA <0.0030 NA <0.00230.012<0.0019 NA1156320--Xylene (Total)NA NA0.014<0.0045 NA0.22NA0.0061 J 0.0094 J 0.0062 JNA9.9120530--SVOCs (8270E)Di-n-butylphthalateNA NA0.35 J 0.33 JNA0.42 JNA <0.130.37 J<0.13 NA351,30016,000--bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateNA NA0.27 J<0.18 NA <0.19 NA <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 NA1439160--1-MethylnaphthaleneNA NA0.18 J<0.16 NA <0.17 NA <0.14 <0.13 <0.13 NA0.111873--2-MethylnaphthaleneNA NA0.25 J<0.18 NA <0.19 NA <0.16 <0.15 <0.15 NA3.148600--PhenanthreneNA NA0.14 J<0.15 NA <0.16 NA <0.13 <0.13 <0.12 NANENENE--Notes:1)North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated July 2022.2)DEQ Division of Waste Management Underground Storage Tank (UST) Section Action Level (December 2013).Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit. EPA laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG or UST Action Level.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; TPH = total petroleum hydrocarbons; DRO = diesel range organicsNA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NE = no established standard; BDL = below laboratory method detection limits; OWS = oil/water separatorJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.Former In-Ground Hydraulic LiftsResidential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Action Level (2)HL-23 / SB-DUP-18-108/3/2021Protection of Groundwater(1)Screening Criteria mg/kghttps://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Soil/Data Tables_JRL9/23/2022Table 1A (Page 2 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1ASummary of Organic Constituent Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSuspect UST Floor Drain Former USTOWSSample IDSB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-5 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8Depth (ft bgs)8-10 2-4 8-10 2-4 2-4 2-4 8-10Sample Date8/2/2021 8/3/2021 8/2/2021 8/3/2021 8/2/2021 8/2/2021 8/2/2021UnitsTPH (8015C)DRO (C10-C28)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA---- --100PCBs (8082A)NANANANANANANANANA--------VOCs (8260D)Acetone<0.0342 <0.0400 <0.0367 <0.0353 <0.030 <0.02830.0793 J<0.0347 <0.0342512,000 140,000--2-Butanone (MEK)<0.026 <0.030 <0.027 <0.026 <0.022 <0.021 <0.032 <0.026 <0.025175,500 40,000--n-Butylbenzene<0.0025 <0.0029 <0.0027 <0.0026 <0.0022 <0.0021 <0.0032 <0.0026 <0.00254.5780 12,000--sec-Butylbenzene<0.0023 <0.0027 <0.0025 <0.0024 <0.0021 <0.0019 <0.0030 <0.0024 <0.00234.11,600 23,000--Chloroform<0.0032 <0.0038 <0.0035 <0.0033 <0.0028 <0.0027 <0.0041 <0.0033 <0.00320.390.340 1.5--1,1-Dichloroethane<0.0022 <0.0026 <0.0024 <0.0023 <0.0019 <0.0018 <0.0028 <0.0022 <0.00220.0343.8 17--cis-1,2-Dichlorethene<0.0008 <0.0021 <0.0020 <0.0019 <0.0016 <0.00150.0141<0.0018 <0.00180.4131 470--Ethylbenzene<0.0025 <0.0029 <0.0027 <0.0026 <0.0022 <0.0021 <0.0031 <0.0025 <0.002513627--Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)<0.0018 <0.0021 <0.0019 <0.0019 <0.0016 <0.0015 <0.0023 <0.0018 <0.00182.3410 2,100--p-Isopropyltoluene<0.0026 <0.0031 <0.0028 <0.0027 <0.0023 <0.0022 <0.0033 <0.00270.0167 NENE NE--Methylene Chloride<0.0146 <0.0171 <0.0157 <0.0151 <0.0128 <0.01210.0748 0.0596 0.05960.02558 650--Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.002.0 <0.0023 <0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0017 <0.0016 <0.0025 <0.00200.0032 J 0.0949 220--Naphthalene<0.0028 <0.0033 <0.0030 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.00230.0158<0.0028 <0.00280.392.1 8.8--n-Propylbenzene<0.0019 <0.0022 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0017 <0.0016 <0.0024 <0.0019 <0.00192.3780.0 5,100.0--Tetrachloroethene<0.00170.0183<0.0018 <0.0017 <0.0015 <0.00140.114 0.473<0.00170.006317 82--Toluene<0.0015 <0.0018 <0.0016 <0.0016 <0.0013 <0.00130.0209<0.0015 <0.00158.3990 9,700--Trichloroethene<0.00140.0075<0.0015 <0.0014 <0.0012 <0.00110.0116 0.0058<0.00140.0210.87 4--1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene<0.0015<0.0017 <0.0016 <0.0015 <0.0013 <0.00120.084.9<0.0015 <0.00141263430--1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.0018 <0.0021 <0.0019 <0.0018 <0.0016 <0.00150.0494<0.0018 <0.00181156 320--Xylene (Total)<0.0015 <0.0035 <0.0039 <0.0031 <0.0027 <0.00250.121<0.0031 <0.00309.9120 530--SVOCs (8270E)Di-n-butylphthalate<0.14 <0.13 <0.14 <0.13 <0.13 <0.12 <0.13 <0.67 <0.13351,30016,000--bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate<0.17 <0.15 <0.16 <0.15 <0.15 <0.14 <0.15 <0.78 <0.151439160--1-Methylnaphthalene<0.15 <0.14 <0.14 <0.14 <0.13 <0.13 <0.14 <0.70 <0.130.111873--2-Methylnaphthalene<0.17 <0.15 <0.16 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.16 <0.80 <0.153.148600--Phenanthrene<0.14 <0.13 <0.13 <0.13 <0.12 <0.12 <0.13 <0.65 <0.12NENENE--Notes:1)North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated July 2022.2)DEQ Division of Waste Management Underground Storage Tank (UST) Section Action Level (December 2013).Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit. EPA laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG or UST Action Level.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; TPH = total petroleum hydrocarbons; DRO = diesel range organicsNA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NE = no established standard; BDL = below laboratory method detection limits; OWS = oil/water separatorJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.Former Wash-Bay Floor Drains Trench Drain - Building 4Action Level (2)Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Protection of Groundwater(1)mg/kgScreening Criteria SB-4 / SB-DUP-22-48/3/2021https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Soil/Data Tables_JRL9/23/2022Table 1A (Page 3 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1BSummary of Metals Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDHL-1 HL-2 HL-3 HL-4 HL-5 HL-6 HL-7 HL-8 HL-9 HL-10 HL-11 HL-12 HL-13 HL-14Depth (ft bgs)Sample DateRange MeanUnitsMetals (6020B/7471B/7199)ArsenicNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.836 JNA NA NA NA5.8 0.68 3.01.0 - 18 4.8BariumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA22.2NA NA NA NA580 3,100 47,00050-1,000 356CadmiumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0958 NA NA NA NA3 14 2001.0 - 10 4.3Chromium (Total)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA7.31NA NA NA NANE-- --7.0 - 300 65Hexavalent ChromiumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.286 NA NA NA NA3.8 0.31 6.5NS NSTrivalent ChromiumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA7.31NA NA NA NA360,000 23,000 350,000NS NSLeadNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA4.61NA NA NA NA270 400 800ND - 50 16MercuryNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0202 NA NA NA NANE 4.7 700.03 - 0.52 0.121SeleniumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.350 JNA NA NA NA2.1 78 1,200<0.1 - 0.8 0.42SilverNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0969 NA NA NA NA3.4 78 1,200ND - 5.0 NSNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated July 2022.2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Drugan and Chekiri, 2005. Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils.Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit.EPA laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses.Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Residential PSRG and background concentrations.Underlined values indicate compound exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRGs and background concentrations.NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NS = not specified; ND = not detected; OWS = oil/water separator; UST - underground storage tankJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.B = Analyte was detected in the associated method blank.ML = Matrix spike recovery and/or matrix spike duplicate recovery was below laboratory control limits. Result may be biased low.R1 = RPD value was outside control limits.Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)mg/kgScreening Criteria 8/3/20218-10Former In-Ground Hydraulic Liftsmg/kgResidential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Background Metals (2)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Soil/Data Tables_JRL9/23/2022Table 1B (Page 1 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1BSummary of Metals Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDHL-15 HL-16 HL-17 HL-18 HL-19 HL-20 HL-21 HL-22 HL-24Depth (ft bgs)Sample Date8/4/2021 Range MeanUnitsMetals (6020B/7471B/7199)ArsenicNA NA1.42 2.77NA2.28NA1.89 0.621 J 1.02 JNA5.8 0.68 3.01.0 - 18 4.8BariumNA NA43.1 94.1NA84.0NA114 16.4 27.9NA580 3,100 47,00050-1,000 356CadmiumNA NA <0.0997 <0.107 NA0.146 JNA <0.111 <0.0966 <0.0969 NA3 14 2001.0 - 10 4.3Chromium (Total)NA NA15.5 40.8NA47.8NA34.3 27.1 19.2NANE-- --7.0 - 300 65Hexavalent ChromiumNA NA <0.2970.487 JNA <0.366 NA <0.3320.603 J<0.289 NA3.8 0.31 6.5NS NSTrivalent ChromiumNA NA15.5 40.31NA47.8NA34.3 26.49 19.2NA360000 23,000 350,000NS NSLeadNA NA8.98 7.09NA11.4NA7.66 9.10 7.53NA270 400 800ND - 50 16MercuryNA NA <0.0210 <0.0224 NA <0.0259 NA <0.0234 <0.02030.0420 JNANE 4.7 700.03 - 0.52 0.121SeleniumNA NA0.580 J 2.98 JNA1.02 JNA1.33 J<0.2030.668 JNA2.1 78 1,200<0.1 - 0.8 0.42SilverNA NA <0.101 <0.108 NA <0.124 NA <0.113 <0.0977 <0.0980 NA3.4 78 1,200ND - 5.0 NSNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated July 2022. 2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Drugan and Chekiri, 2005. Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils. Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit. EPA laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Residential PSRG and background concentrations. Underlined values indicate compound exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRGs and background concentrations.NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NS = not specified; ND = not detected; OWS = oil/water separator; UST - underground storage tankJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. B = Analyte was detected in the associated method blank.ML = Matrix spike recovery and/or matrix spike duplicate recovery was below laboratory control limits. Result may be biased low.R1 = RPD value was outside control limits. Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Screening Criteria HL-23 / SB-DUP-1Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Background Metals (2)8-10mg/kgmg/kgFormer In-Ground Hydraulic Lifts8/3/2021https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Soil/Data Tables_JRL9/23/2022Table 1B (Page 2 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1BSummary of Metals Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSuspected USTFloor Drain Former USTOWSSample IDSB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-5 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8 BG-1 BG-2 BG-3Depth (ft bgs)8-10 2-4 8-10 2-4 2-4 2-4 8-10Sample Date8/2/2021 8/3/2021 8/2/2021 8/3/2021 8/2/2021 8/2/2021 8/2/2021Range MeanUnitsMetals by 6020B/7471B/7199Arsenic0.567 B,J 0.536 B,J 0.210 B,J 0.324 B,J 0.403 B,J,ML 0.454 B,J 0.541 B,J 0.456 B,J 0.932 B,J 0.910 B,J 0.813 B,J 0.750 B,J 5.8 0.68 3.01.0 - 18 4.8Barium301 55.2 11.8 10.1 10.8 5.82 149 142 38.0 81.6 123 59.7 580 3,100 47,00050-1,000 356Cadmium<0.122 <0.104 <0.103 <0.0990 <0.0997 <0.0975 <0.104 <0.102 <0.101 <0.09710.107 J<0.09223 14 2001.0 - 10 4.3Chromium (Total)28.6 17.5 2.45 J 9.44 19.3 14.8 14.7 16.9 12.9 21.2 11.5 0.989 J NE-- --7.0 - 300 65Hexavalent Chromium0.736 J 0.875 J<0.3070.865 J 1.34 1.35 0.715 J 0.882 J<0.302 <0.290 <0.282 <0.2753.8 0.31 6.5NS NSTrivalent Chromium27.86 16.63 2.45 J 8.58 17.96 13.15 13.99 16.02 12.9 21.2 11.5 0.989 J 360000 23,000 350,000NS NSLead4.87 5.99 2.90 B 4.39 6.12 5.51 1.99 B,J 3.00 B 5.32 12.6 11.5 7.38 270 400 800ND - 50 16Mercury<0.0257 <0.0219 <0.0482 <0.0463 <0.0210 ML,R1 <0.0456 <0.0219 <0.02150.0260 J 0.0226 J<0.0199 <0.0194NE 4.7 700.03 - 0.52 0.121Selenium0.305 J<0.219 <0.217 <0.208 <0.210 <0.205 <0.219 <0.2150.242 J 0.543 J 0.379 J 0.408 J 2.1 78 1,200<0.1 - 0.8 0.42Silver<0.123 <0.609 <0.104 <0.100 <0.101 <0.0986 <0.105 <0.103 <0.102 <0.0982 <0.0958 <0.09333.4 78 1,200ND - 5.0 NSNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated July 2022. 2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Drugan and Chekiri, 2005. Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils. Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit. EPA laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Residential PSRG and background concentrations. Underlined values indicate compound exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRGs and background concentrations.NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NS = not specified; ND = not detected; OWS = oil/water separator; UST - underground storage tankJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. B = Analyte was detected in the associated method blank.ML = Matrix spike recovery and/or matrix spike duplicate recovery was below laboratory control limits. Result may be biased low.R1 = RPD value was outside control limits. 2-40-28/3/2021Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Screening Criteria Former Wash-Bay Floor Drains Trench Drain - Building 4 Background8/2/2021SB-4 / SB-DUP-2mg/kgmg/kgResidential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Background Metals (2)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Soil/Data Tables_JRL9/23/2022Table 1B (Page 3 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1CSummary of Soil Analytical Data Harrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002Building IDLocationFormer Wash BaySample IDMP-3 MP-18A MP-18B MP-18C MP-18DDepth (ft bgs)0-1 1-2Sample DateRange Range MeanUnitsVOCs (8260D)Acetone<0.0380.10 J C7 0.097 J C7<0.037 <0.040 <0.040 <0.034 <0.0422514,000 210,000-- -- --cis-1,2-Dichlorethene<0.0020 <0.0026 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0018 <0.00220.4131 470-- -- --Methylene Chloride<0.016 <0.0210.036 C7<0.016 <0.017 <0.017 <0.015 <0.0180.02558 650-- -- --Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.0022 <0.00290.029 C7<0.0021 <0.0023 <0.0023 <0.0020 <0.00240.0949 220-- -- --Naphthalene<0.0031 <0.0040 <0.0031 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.00330.013<0.00340.392.1 8.8-- -- --Tetrachloroethene<0.00190.65 0.16 0.21 0.53 0.18 0.022 0.0730.006317 82-- -- --Toluene<0.00170.012 0.0050 J<0.0016 <0.0018 <0.0018 <0.0015 <0.00188.3990 9,700-- -- --Trichloroethene<0.0015 <0.0020 <0.0015 <0.0015 <0.0016 <0.0016 <0.0014 <0.00170.0210.87 4-- -- --1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene<0.00160.035 0.0071<0.0016 <0.0017 <0.00170.0094<0.00181263 370-- -- --1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.00200.021 0.0042 J<0.0019 <0.0021 <0.00210.0030 J<0.00221156 320-- -- --m&p-Xylene<0.00410.013 J 0.0061 J<0.0039 <0.0043 <0.0043 <0.0037 <0.00449.8120 500-- -- --o-Xylene<0.00260.0073 J 0.0031 J<0.0025 <0.0028 <0.0027 <0.0024 <0.00299.8140 590-- -- --Xylene (Total)<0.00340.021 0.0092 J<0.0033 <0.0036 <0.0035 <0.0031 <0.00379.9120 530-- -- --SVOCs (8270E)NAALL BDLNANANANANANA ------------Metals by 6020B/7471B/7199ArsenicNA0.93NA NA NA NA NA NA5.8 0.68 3.0 0.75 - 0.911.0 - 18 4.8BariumNA116NA NA NA NA NA NA580 3,100 47,000 59.7 - 12350-1,000 356CadmiumNA0.063 JNA NA NA NA NA NA3 1.4 20 ND - 0.107 J1.0 - 10 4.3Chromium (Total)NA26.0NA NA NA NA NA NANE NE NE 0.989 J - 21.27.0 - 300 65Hexavalent ChromiumNA1.47NA NA NA NA NA NA3.8 0.31 6.5 NDNS NSTrivalent ChromiumNA24.5NA NA NA NA NA NA360,000 23,000 350,000 0.989 - 21.2NS NSLeadNA7.3NA NA NA NA NA NA270.0 400 800 7.38 - 12.6ND - 50 16MercuryNA <0.0098 NA NA NA NA NA NANE 4.7 70 ND - 0.0226 J0.03 - 0.52 0.121SeleniumNA0.25 JNA NA NA NA NA NA2.1 78 1,200 0.379 - 0.543<0.1 - 0.8 0.42SilverNA0.23 JNA NA NA NA NA NA3.4 78 1,200 NDND - 5.0 NSNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2022.3) Site specific background metals collected H&H during Phase II Environmental Site Assessment activities on 8/21/2021.2)Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Drugan and Chekiri, 2005. Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils.Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicableNE = not established; BDL = below laboratory method detection limits; AST = aboveground storage tankC7 = Compound is a possible laboratory contaminant.J = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.mg/kg0-1 / DUP-01MP-185/20/20220-1Site Specific Background Metals (2)Maintenance BayBuilding 3Screening Criteria Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)BackgroundMetals (3)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Additional Assessment/Report/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Data Tables (combined).xlsx7/15/2022Table 1C (Page 1 of 2) Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1CSummary of Soil Analytical Data Harrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002Building IDLocationSample IDMP-30 MP-30A MP-30B MP-30C MP-30D MP-43A MP-43B MP-43C MP-43DDepth (ft bgs)0-1 0-1 0-1 0-1 0-1 1-2 2-3 1-2 0-1 1-2 1-2Sample DateRange Range MeanUnitsVOCs (8260D)Acetone0.041 J C7<0.050 <0.052 <0.040 <0.037 <0.040 <0.044 <0.052 <0.045 <0.039 <0.0632514,000 210,000-- -- --cis-1,2-Dichlorethene<0.0022 <0.0027 <0.0028 <0.0021 <0.00200.0033 J 0.0066 J<0.0028 <0.0024 <0.0021 <0.00330.4131 470-- -- --Methylene Chloride<0.017 <0.0220.064 C7<0.017 <0.016 <0.017 <0.019 <0.022 <0.019 <0.017 <0.0270.02558 650-- -- --Methyl-tert-butyl ether0.019 C7<0.0029 <0.0030 <0.0023 <0.00210.0043 J<0.0025 <0.0030 <0.0026 <0.0023 <0.00370.0949 220-- -- --Naphthalene<0.0033 <0.0041 <0.0043 <0.0032 <0.0030 <0.0033 <0.0036 <0.0042 <0.0036 <0.0032 <0.00510.392.1 8.8-- -- --Tetrachloroethene<0.0020 <0.0025 <0.0026 <0.0020 <0.00180.14<0.0021 <0.00251.3 0.73<0.00310.006317 82-- -- --Toluene<0.0018 <0.0022 <0.0023 <0.0018 <0.0016 <0.0018 <0.0019 <0.0023 <0.0020 <0.0017 <0.00288.3990 9,700-- -- --Trichloroethene<0.0016 <0.0020 <0.0021 <0.0016 <0.00150.0071<0.0017 <0.00210.0310.020<0.00250.0210.87 4-- -- --1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene<0.0017 <0.0022 <0.0022 <0.0017 <0.0016 <0.0017 <0.0019 <0.0022 <0.0019 <0.0017 <0.00271263 370-- -- --1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.0021 <0.0026 <0.0027 <0.0021 <0.0019 <0.0021 <0.0023 <0.0027 <0.0023 <0.0020 <0.00331156 320-- -- --m&p-Xylene<0.0043 <0.0054 <0.0056 <0.0042 <0.0039 <0.0043 <0.0046 <0.0055 <0.0047 <0.0042 <0.00679.8120 500-- -- --o-Xylene<0.0028 <0.0035 <0.0036 <0.0027 <0.0025 <0.0028 <0.0030 <0.0036 <0.0031 <0.0027 <0.00439.8140 590-- -- --Xylene (Total)<0.0036 <0.0045 <0.0046 <0.0035 <0.0033 <0.0036 <0.0039 <0.0046 <0.0040 <0.0035 <0.00569.9120 530-- -- --SVOCs (8270E)NANANANANA ALL BDL NANANANANA------------Metals by 6020B/7471B/7199ArsenicNA NA NA NA NA0.99NA NA NA NA NA5.8 0.68 3.0 0.75 - 0.911.0 - 18 4.8BariumNA NA NA NA NA227NA NA NA NA NA580 3,100 47,000 59.7 - 12350-1,000 356CadmiumNA NA NA NA NA0.1NA NA NA NA NA3 1.4 20 ND - 0.107 J1.0 - 10 4.3Chromium (Total)NA NA NA NA NA33.3NA NA NA NA NANE NE NE 0.989 J - 21.27.0 - 300 65Hexavalent ChromiumNA NA NA NA NA1.27NA NA NA NA NA3.8 0.31 6.5 NDNS NSTrivalent ChromiumNA NA NA NA NA32.03NA NA NA NA NA360,000 23,000 350,000 0.989 - 21.2NS NSLeadNA NA NA NA NA11.2NA NA NA NA NA270.0 400 800 7.38 - 12.6ND - 50 16MercuryNA NA NA NA NA <0.0087 NA NA NA NA NANE 4.7 70 ND - 0.0226 J0.03 - 0.52 0.121SeleniumNA NA NA NA NA0.23 JNA NA NA NA NA2.1 78 1,200 0.379 - 0.543<0.1 - 0.8 0.42SilverNA NA NA NA NA0.17 JNA NA NA NA NA3.4 78 1,200 NDND - 5.0 NSNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2022.3) Site specific background metals collected H&H during Phase II Environmental Site Assessment activities on 8/21/2021.2)Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Drugan and Chekiri, 2005. Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils.Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicableNE = not established; BDL = below laboratory method detection limits; AST = aboveground storage tankC7 = Compound is a possible laboratory contaminant.J = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.Site Specific Background Metals (2)mg/kg5/23/2022Waste Oil AST Storage AreaBuilding 4Screening Criteria Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1)Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)BackgroundMetals (3)Trench Drain MP-435/20/2022 5/23/2022https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Additional Assessment/Report/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Data Tables (combined).xlsx7/15/2022Table 1C (Page 2 of 2) Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data Harrelson FordCharlotte, North Carolina H&H Job No. ACO-002LocationDowngradient of OWSDowngradient of Undocumented USTsDowngradient of Building 4Sample IDTMW-1 TMW-3 TMW-4 TMW-5Sample DateUnitsVOCs (8260D)Acetone<5.1 <5.1 <5.120.2 J<5.1 <5.1 <5.1 <.16,000 NE NEBenzene0.39 J<0.34 <0.34 <0.34 <0.34 <0.34 <0.34 <0.341 1.6 6.92-Hexanone<0.48<0.48<0.48<0.48<0.48<0.480.83 J0.84 JNE1,6006,900Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.42<0.42<0.423.8<0.42<0.42<0.42<0.42204502,000Tetrachloroethene<0.29<0.29<0.29<0.29<0.29<0.292.42.50.71248SVOCs (8270E)ALL BDLALL BDLALL BDLALL BDLALL BDLALL BDLALL BDLALL BDL ------Metals (6020B/7470)Arsenic<1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.11.3 J 0.099 J 0.10 J10-- --Barium37.7 33.4 34.4 46.6 41.2 33.4 35.7 34.6700-- --Cadmium<0.11 <0.11 <0.11 <0.11 <0.11 <0.11 <0.60 <0.0602-- --Chromium (total)3.4 J 1.5 J 1.3 J<1.15.1 6.3 1.1 1.210-- --Lead<0.89 <0.89 <0.89 <0.891.7<0.890.13 J 0.13 J15-- --Mercury<0.12 <0.12 <0.12 <0.12 <0.12 <0.12 <0.12 <0.121 0.18 0.75Selenium<1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.40.27 J 0.27 J20-- --Silver<0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.44 <0.070 <0.07020-- --Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) 15A NCAC 02L.0202 Groundwater Standards (2L Standards) dated April 20222) DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSLs) dated January 2022Compounds are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).With the exception of metals, only constituents detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L).Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.Bold values indicates compound concentration exceeds 2L Standard.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; -- = not applicable; BDL = below detection limitsUST = underground storage tank; OWS = oil/water separatorJ = Compound was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.µg/LAdjacent to Building 3TMW-6/ TMW-DUP6/30/2022UpgradientScreening Criteria TMW-2 / GW-DUP-12L Standards (1)Residential GWSLs (2) Non-Residential GWSLs (2)8/5/2021https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Additional Assessment/Report/Tables/Harrelson Ford ‐ Data Tables (combined).xlsx7/15/2022Table 2 (Page 1 of 1) Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3Summary of Sub-Slab Vapor Analytical Data Harrelson Ford Charlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002Evaluation AreaSample IDSSV-3SSV-4MP-3SSV-5SSV-6SSV-5MP-30MP-43Sample Date5/16/20222/17/20222/16/20222/17/20225/17/20225/16/2022Sample TypeUnitsVOCs (TO-15)1,1,1-Trichloroethane1.86 J1.84 J<0.144<0.144<0.86<64<64<2.88<0.144<2.88<0.86<0.8635,000440,0001,1-Dichloroethene<0.107<0.107<0.107<0.107<0.60<45<45<2.14<0.1071.2331,40018,0001,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1.22 J1.33 J4.421.68 J2.5<33<33<2.202.91<2.203.96.74205,3001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.236<0.2361.32 J0.408 J0.61 J<39<39<4.720.732 J<4.721.124205,3001,3-Butadiene<0.328<0.328<0.328<0.328<0.37<28<2822.1<0.32822.1<0.37<0.373.1411,4-Dichlorobenzene<0.186<0.186<0.186<0.186<0.79<59<59<3.721.67 J<3.72<0.79<0.798.51101,4-Dioxane1.03 J0.951 J4.04<0.435<0.60<45<45<8.69<0.435<8.69<0.60<0.60192502-Butanone (MEK)4.935.712.943.35<6.3<470<4709.73 J15.99.73 J<6.37.9 J35,000440,0002-Hexanone3.233.223.283.50<0.41<31<31<5.713.93<5.71<0.41<0.412102,6002-Propanol (Isopropanol)22.823.121.62.11 JB6.0 J<250<2507.67 J61.27.67 J130<3.41,40018,0004-Ethyltoluene<0.128<0.1280.777 J<0.1280.81 J<45<4511.4 J0.600 J11.4 J0.83 J1.2NENE4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)0.508 J<0.1211.18 J1.01 J<0.44<33<33<2.424.48<2.42<0.44<0.4421,000260,000Acetone38.942.633.533.122<860<86024.4 J39824.4 J55<11NENEBenzene0.262 J0.303 J0.668 J0.326 J1.0<36<3635.90.393 J35.92.21512160Carbon disulfide2.29 J2.25 J0.532 J1.93 J<0.58<43<4325.9 J3.86 J25.9 J1.3 J<0.584,90061,000Chloroethane<0.164<0.164<0.164<0.164<0.47<35<3512.1 J<0.16412.1 J<0.47<0.4728,000350,000Chloroform<0.0864<0.0864<0.0864<0.08646.9<70<70<1.730.425 J<1.73<0.93<0.934.153Chloromethane<0.0673<0.0673<0.0673<0.0673<0.33<25<25<1.34<0.0673<1.341.4<0.336307,900cis-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.0955<0.0955<0.0955<0.0955<0.581,10099013,5001.13 J13,5001201,500NENECyclohexane<0.1614.696.916.812.5<31<3172.08.8072.0203642,000530,000Dichlorodifluoromethane2.792.752.722.763<72<72<2.682.62<2.682.22.6708,800EthanolNANANANA110 V-06<500<500NANANA50 V-0662 V-06NENEEthyl acetate<0.136<0.136<0.136<0.13662 L-03, V-05, V-34<270<270<2.72<0.136<2.72<3.6<3.64906,100Ethylbenzene0.395 J0.399 J2.09 J0.577 J0.89<38<3861.60.903 J61.62.2337490Methylene Chloride0.750 J0.750 J0.604 J0.986 J<3.2<240<240<9.750.938 J<9.75<3.2<3.23,40053,000Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.0336<0.0336<0.0336<0.0336<0.56<42<42252<0.0336252<0.56273604,700Naphthalene<0.183<0.1832.752.70<0.79<59<59<3.66<0.183<3.66<0.790.84 J2.836n-Heptane<0.143<0.1430.533 J<0.143<0.52<39<3923.8 J1.14 J23.8 J8.94.92,80035,000n-Hexane<0.0472<0.04721.10 J<0.0472<3.7<280<28050.3<0.047250.35916 J4,90061,000m&p-Xylene1.55 J1.48 J12.72.19 J2.4<73<732273.55 J2277.7107008,800o-Xylene0.734 J0.677 J12.61.15 J1.4<33<3374.61.61 J74.63.74.57008,800Propylene<0.242<0.24221.0<0.242<3.0<230<230393<0.242393<3.018021,000260,000Styrene0.430 J0.405 J0.741 J0.575 J<0.45<34<34<2.480.835 J<2.480.56 J0.65 J7,00088,000Tetrachloroethene6,6706,4401,0903.37 J 6957,00055,00032.2 J64732.2 J 874,6002803,500Tetrahydrofuran<0.1070.779 J<0.1070.457 J<0.97<73<73<2.14<0.107<2.14<0.97<0.9714,000180,000Toluene2.031.82 J4.022.727.9<32<322247.22224111735,000440,000trans-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.108<0.108<0.108<0.108<0.62<47<47132<0.1081320.82422803,500Trichloroethene1.54 J1.50 J<0.199<0.1991.3410370<3.9826.9<3.9838 2,00014180Trichlorofluoromethane1.12 J1.11 J1.32 J1.43 J1.5 J<100<100<2.601.33 J<2.601.4 J<1.3NENEVinyl chloride<0.127<0.127<0.127<0.127<0.46<35<3511,700<0.12711,7001.22705.6 280Xylene (Total)2.28 J2.16 J25.33.34 J3.8<106<1063025.16 J30211.414.57008,800Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated July 2022.Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).Laboratory analytical method is shown in parentheses.Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values exceed the Residential SGSL.Bold Underlined values exceed the Non-Residential SGSL.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; NE = not established; NA = not analyzed J = Compound concentration was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.L-03 = Laboratory fortified blank/laboratory control sample recovery is outside of control limits. Reported value for this compound is likely to be based on the low sideV-05 = Continuing calibration verification (CCV) did not meet method specifications and was biased on the low side for this compound.V-06 = Continuing calibration verification (CCV) did not meet method specifications and was biased on the high side for this compound.V-34 = Initial calibration verification (ICV) did not meet method specifications and was biased on the low side for this compound. Reported result is estimated.Screening Criteria Residential SGSLs (1)Non-Residential SGSLs (1)SSV-2/SSV-DUPBuilding 3Sub-Slab Soil Gas2/16/2022MP-18/MP-DUPBuilding 45/16/2022µg/m3https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Ardent - ACO/ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Sub-slab and Soil GasTable 3 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4Summary of Soil Gas Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002Evaluation AreaExteriorSample IDSG-2 SG-3 SG-8 SG-12 SG-13 SG-16Sample Date2/17/2022Sample TypeUnitsVOCs (TO-15)1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane<0.75 <0.78 <0.94 <0.771.7 J<0.1041.6 211,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane0.91 J 1.3 J<0.73 <0.602.9 J1.12 J35,000 440,0001,1-Dichloroethane<0.33 <0.35 <0.42 <0.340.46 J<0.101587701,2,4-Trimethylbenzene10.5 1.6 J 8.4 10.7 12.05.67420 5,3001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene3.0 0.78 J 5.0 4.8 5.41.97 J420 5,3001,3-Dichlorobenzene6.6 7.9<1.3 <1.013.4<0.174NE NE2-Butanone (MEK)19.0 24.9 64.0 7.7 11.215.635,000 440,0002-Hexanone1.5 J<0.9317.2<0.919.9 J<0.285210 2,6002-Propanol (Isopropanol)<1.01.8 J<1.3 <1.031.7<0.1391,400 18,0004-Ethyltoluene4.6 J 3.2 J 1.8 J 1.7 J 2.5 J1.96 JNE NE4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)3.0 J 2.4 J 6.9 J 3.3 J 4.9 J3.5621,000 260,000Acetone26.6 51.3 552 354 66.672.5220,000 2,700,000Benzene1.619.1 19.4 19.210.720.912 160Bromodichloromethane5.30.65 J<0.60 <0.49 <0.57<0.1502.5 33Bromomethane0.61 J<0.320.48 J 1.9<0.36<0.11535 440Carbon disulfide42.3 101 217 6.4 39.812.04,900 61,000Carbon tetrachloride<0.57 <0.59 <0.71 <0.58 <0.671.26 JChlorobenzene<0.31 <0.33 <0.39 <0.32 <0.37<0.107350 4,400Chloroethane0.93 J 1.8<0.56 <0.46 <0.54<0.16470,000 880,000Chloroform87.61200.92 J<0.38 <0.44<0.08644.1 53Chloromethane<0.17 <0.18 <0.21 <0.183.90.977 J630 7,900Cyclohexane2.9 J 52.2 63.5 218 52.421.142,000 530,000Dibromochloromethane<1.0 <1.1 <1.3 <1.1 <1.2<0.208NE NEDichlorodifluoromethane3.3 2.3<0.47 <0.392.83.16700 8,800Ethanol7.6 29.5 66.8 13.0 82.6NANE NEEthyl acetate<0.260.67 J 1.3 J<0.2717.0<0.136490 6,100Ethylbenzene12.6 4.3 4.3 1.6 J 28.915.837 490Methylene Chloride<1.210.4<1.5 <1.23.8 J2.173,400 53,000Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.25 <0.26651<0.26 <0.30<0.0336360 4,700Naphthalene<4.4 <4.6 <5.55.8<5.22.912.8 36n-Heptane4.4 33.8 27.4 9.1 8.926.12,800 35,000n-Hexane16.9 84.0 74.1 4.3 16.357.04,900 61,000m&p-Xylene41.6 6.0 15.4 8.9 11.355.0700 8,800o-Xylene20.6 3.5 6.3 9.3 5.515.2700 8,800Propylene46.9 787<0.33 <0.27 <0.3115221,000 260,000Styrene<0.781.4 J<0.97 <0.79 <0.921.58 J7,000 88,000Tetrachloroethene23.7 1.7 16.3 1.6 1.92.44 J280 3,500Tetrahydrofuran<0.36 <0.38 <0.45 <0.37 <0.431.5714,000 180,000Toluene32.8 20.1 31.9 6.3 50.625935,000 440,000Trichloroethene<0.40 <0.41 <0.49 <0.40 <0.47<0.19914 180Trichlorofluoromethane1.2 J 0.96 J 2.6 J<0.481.5 J2.57 JNE NEVinyl chloride<0.182.0<0.22 <0.18 <0.21<0.1275.6 280Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated July 2022.Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).Laboratory analytical method is shown in parentheses.Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values exceed the Residential SGSL.Bold Underlined values exceed the Non-Residential SGSL.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; NE = not establishedJ = Compound concentration was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.µg/m3µg/m3Screening Criteria 8/5/2021Non-Residential SGSLs (1)Residential SGSLs (1)Building 3 and Building 4Exterior Soil Gashttps://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Ardent - ACO/ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Data Tables_JRLTable 4 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PC

Figures
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP ElevationProgram, Geographic Names Information System, National HydrographyDataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset,and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S.Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data;U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAANational Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal ReliefModel. Data refreshed May, 2020.
SITE LOCATION MAP
HARRELSON FORD6500 SOUTH BOULEVARDCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: 6-23-21
JOB NO: ACO-002
REVISION NO: 0
FIGURE. 1
2923 South Tryon Street - Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (f)License # C-1269 / # C-245 Geology
TITLE
PROJECT
0 2,000 4,000
SCALE IN FEET
Path: S:\AAA-Master Projects\Ardent - ACO\ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard\Figures\Figure-1.mxdN
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
CHARLOTTE EAST, NORTH CAROLINA 2013CHARLOTTE WEST, NORTH CAROLINA 2013
QUADRANGLE7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
SITE
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. ACO-002
DATE: 2-1-22
FIGURE NO. 2
HARRELSON FORD
6500 SOUTH BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE MAP
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PARCEL BOUNDARY
RAILROAD
TRENCH DRAIN
RECTANGULAR FLOOR DRAIN
CIRCULAR FLOOR DRAIN
WASTE OIL AST
NEW OIL AST
FORMER UST
CONCRETE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
VENT PIPE
OUT-OF-USE IN-GROUND HYDRAULIC LIFT
OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
PARKING
NOTES:
1.PARCEL DATA OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG COUNTY
GIS, 2021.
2.AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS, 2021.OLD PINEVILLE ROADSOUTH BOULEVARDVICTORY CHRISTIAN CAMPUS
(7000 OLD PINEVILLE ROAD)
BANNER
(6424 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
ADAMS CAR SALES AND SERVICE
(6501 & 6511 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
FISHY FISH MARKET
(6531 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
AMERICAN AUTO SALES
(6535 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
LIFT AUTO AND SALES
(6543 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
SOUTH BOULEVARD CAR WASH CENTER
(6547 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
GOODWILL
(6607 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
LA PREFERIDA
(6625 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
PAVED PARKING
(NO ASSIGNED ADDRESS)
BUILDING #1 -
VACANT
WAREHOUSE
BUILDING #2 -
MULTI-TENANT
AUTO REPAIR
OFFICES/
STORAGE
OFFICES
BUILDING #4 -
MAINTENANCE BAYS
WITH ABOVEGROUND
HYDRAULIC LIFTS
BUILDING #3 -
MAINTENANCE BAYS WITH
OUT-OF-USE IN-GROUND
HYDRAULIC LIFTS
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Ardent - ACO\ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard\Brownfields\Assessment\Work Plan\Figures\Figures 20220201.dwg, FIG 2, 2/2/2022 12:22:03 PM, sperry
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. ACO-002
DATE: 6-13-22
FIGURE NO. 3
HARRELSON FORD
6500 SOUTH BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
BUILDING #4
BUILDING #3
OFFICE/STORAGE
OFFICE
OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
HL-18 HL-17 HL-16 HL-15 HL-14
HL-13 HL-12
HL-7HL-4 HL-3
HL-6 HL-5
HL-19
HL-20
HL-21 HL-22 HL-23 HL-11 HL-10 HL-9
HL-8
HL-2
SG-7
SG-2
SB-2
SB-4
SB-5
SB-3
TMW-4/SB-1
SG-3
SG-8
SSV-6
SSV-5
SB-6
SB-7
TMW-3/SB-8
SSV-3 SSV-4
SSV-2
SG-16
SB-9
SG-13
SG-12
TMW-5
MP-1
MP-2
MP-5
MP-6
MP-9
MP-10
MP-13
MP-14
MP-17
MP-18
MP-21
MP-22
MP-25
MP-26
MP-27
MP-28
MP-23
MP-24
MP-19
MP-20
MP-15
MP-16
MP-11
MP-12
MP-7
MP-8
MP-3
MP-4
MP-29
MP-31
MP-32
MP-33
MP-34
MP-35
MP-36
MP-37
MP-38
MP-39
MP-40
MP-44
MP-42
MP-41 MP-45
MP-46
MP-47
MP-48
MP-18A
MP-18B
MP-18C
MP-18D
MP-3A
MP-3B
MP-3C
MP-3D
MP-30A
MP-30B
MP-30C
MP-30D
MP-43A
MP-43B
MP-43C
MP-43D
MP-43B 0-1'
PCE 1.3
TCE 0.031
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
SAMPLE ID
SAMPLE DEPTH
CONCENTRATION
(mg/kg)
CONSTITUENT
MP-18 0-1'1-2'
PCE 0.65 0.21
TCE ND ND
VC ND ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND ND
MP-3 0-1'
NO DETECTIONS
MP-18C 0-1'
PCE 0.022
TCE ND
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
MP-18D 0-1'
PCE 0.073
TCE ND
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
MP-18A 0-1'
PCE 0.53
TCE ND
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
MP-18B 0-1'
PCE 0.18
TCE ND
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
MP-30 0-1'
NO DETECTIONS
MP-30B 0-1'
NO DETECTIONS
MP-30A 0-1'
NO DETECTIONS
MP-30C 0-1'
NO DETECTIONS
MP-30D 0-1'
NO DETECTIONS
MP-43 1-2'2-3'
PCE 0.14 ND
TCE 0.0071 ND
VC ND ND
cis-1,2-DCE 0.0033 J 0.0066 J
MP-43B 0-1'
PCE 1.3
TCE 0.031
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
MP-43A 1-2'
NO DETECTIONS
MP-43D 1-2'
NO DETECTIONS
MP-43C 1-2'
PCE 0.73
TCE 0.020
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
MP-30
MP-43
NOTES:
1. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS, 2021.
2. CVOCs NOT DETECTED AT CONCENTRATIONS ABOVE
MDLs IN GREY SAMPLES.
3. CVOCs DETECTED AT CONCENTRATIONS BELOW DEQ
DWM VAPOR INTRUSION VISLs IN GREEN HIGHLIGHTED
SAMPLES.
4. CVOCs DETECTED AT CONCENTRATIONS ABOVE DEQ
DWM VAPOR INTRUSION VISLs IN BLUE HIGHLIGHTED
SAMPLES.
5. SOIL, GROUNDWATER, SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS, AND
EXTERIOR SOIL GAS SAMPLES COLLECTED BY H&H IN
AUGUST 2021, FEBRUARY 2022, AND MAY 2022.
6.
7.
J FLAG DENOTES ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION BETWEEN
LABORATORY REPORTING LIMIT AND METHOD
DETECTION LIMIT.
BOLD VALUE INDICATES COMPOUND EXCEEDS THE
PROTECTION OF GROUNDWATER PSRG.ONLY VOC COMPOUNDS SHOWN
ACRONYM KEY
PCE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TCE TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VC VINYL CHLORIDE
cis-1,2-DCE cis-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE
ND NOT DETECTED
CVOCs CHLORINATED VOLATILE
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
SGSLs SUB-SLAB AND EXTERIOR SOIL
GAS SCREENING LEVELS
MDLs LABORATORY METHOD
DETECTION LIMITS
HL-10 8-10'
PCE 0.14
TCE 0.012
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
HL-17 8-10'
PCE 0.014
TCE ND
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE 0.0077
HL-18 8-10'
PCE ND
TCE ND
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE 0.046
HL-20 8-10'
PCE 0.93
TCE 0.041
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
HL-22 8-10'
PCE 0.018
TCE ND
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE 0.0081
HL-23 8-10'
PCE 0.085
TCE ND
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
SB-2 2-4'
PCE 0.018
TCE 0.0075
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
SB-6 2-4'
PCE 0.11
TCE 0.012
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE 0.014
SB-7 2-4'
PCE 0.47
TCE 0.0058
VC ND
cis-1,2-DCE ND
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF FLOOR DRAIN
SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS SURVEY MONITORING
POINT
EXTERIOR SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
SOIL BORING LOCATION
CO-LOCATED SOIL BORING AND
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL LOCATION
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL LOCATION
EVALUATION AREA
EVALUATION DESIGNATION
TMW-6
A
A C E G I K M
B D F H J L N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Ardent - ACO\ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard\Brownfields\Additional Assessment\Figures\Figures 20220614.dwg, FIG 5, 7/12/2022 8:07:26 AM, shaynes8.