26049 - Bevs Touch Cleaners_EMP_20230921

Via Email
July 5, 2023

NCDEQ – Division of Waste Management
Brownfields Program
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646

Attn: Mr. Bill Schmithorst

Re: Environmental Management Plan
Former Bevs Touch Cleaners
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 26049-22-060
H&H Project No. AKR-008

Dear Bill:

On behalf of KA 1427 South Property Owner LLC, enclosed is the Environmental Management
Plan for the former Bevs Touch Cleaners Brownfields property (Brownfields Project No. 26049-
22-060) located in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County for your review and approval.

Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact
us at [phone].

Sincerely,
Hart & Hickman, PC
Matt Bramblett, PE Haley Martin, PG
Principal Senior Project Geologist

Enclosure

cc: Mr. Dan Coith and Mr. Dan Outen, Akridge (Via Email)
Ms. Kary Katherine Stukes, Moore & Van Allen, PLLC (Via Email)
#C-1269 Engineering
#C-245 Geology

Environmental Management Plan

Former Bevs Touch Cleaners
1427 South Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 26049-22-060

July 5, 2023
H&H Job No. AKR-008

CONTENTS
Completed EMP Template Form

Tables

Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Data
Table 2 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data
Table 3 Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Data

Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Sample Location Map
Figure 4 Soil, Soil Gas, and Groundwater Screening Level Exceedances Map

Appendices

Appendix A Preliminary Redevelopment Plan
Appendix B Preliminary Grading Plan and Cut/Fill Analysis
Appendix C Preliminary Construction Schedule

1 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION  
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in 
the North Carolina Brownfields Redevelopment Section at the direction of a Brownfields 
project manager. 

The EMP is a standard requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA).  Its purpose is to clarify 
actions to be taken during demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an effort 
to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other 
environmental conditions.  The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and 
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory‐compliant 
decision‐making at the site.  As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP, 
including contingency planning for unknowns.  Consult your project manager if you have 
questions. 

Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all 
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any 
earthmoving or other development‐related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at 
the Brownfields Property, including demolition.  For the EMP to be valid for use, it must be 
completed, reviewed by the Section, signed by all parties working on the project, and 
approved by the Brownfields project manager.  Failure to comply with the requirements of the 
EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a recorded agreement, be cause for 
a reopener.   

The EMP is valid only for the scope of work described herein and must be updated to be 
applicable for new phases of redevelopment or after significant changes in applicable 
regulatory guidance.  Risk characterization of a Brownfields Property to DEQ’s written 
satisfaction is required prior to EMP approval. 

Voluntary Metrics Tab 
The NC Brownfields Redevelopment Section updates estimated capital investment (from the
Brownfields Property Application) and estimated jobs created (from the Brownfields
Agreement) whenever possible. As a voluntary measure, you may opt to complete the below
information for capital investment and jobs created as estimated by your final redevelopment
plans for the Brownfields Property:

1. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: Confidential; See
Brownfields Property Application
2. Estimated jobs created:
a. Construction Jobs: 300
b. Full Time Post-Redevelopment Jobs: 40

2 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
Table of Contents
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION .................................................................. 1 
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................................................................... 1 
GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................ 4 
COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 4 
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION ..................................................... 5 
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS ........................................................................................................................ 6 
CONTAMINATED MEDIA ......................................................................................................................... 7 
PART 1. SOIL ........................................................................................................................................ 8 
PART 2. GROUNDWATER .................................................................................................................. 19 
PART 3. SURFACE WATER .................................................................................................................. 22 
PART 4. SEDIMENT ............................................................................................................................ 22 
PART 5.  SOIL VAPOR ......................................................................................................................... 22 
PART 6. INDOOR AIR ......................................................................................................................... 24 
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM ............................................................................................. 24 
CONTINGENCY PLAN ............................................................................................................................. 25 
POST‐REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING ..................................................................................................... 27 
APPROVAL SIGNATURES ....................................................................................................................... 28 

3 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
So that the EMP provides value in protecting Brownfields eligibility and public health, the 
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the 
EMP for review.  Any EMP prepared without completing all of the following is premature and may 
be returned without comment.   

☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has 
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields project manager. 

☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project, 
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields project manager. 

Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant 
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment: 

☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if 
not, conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted. 

☒ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for 
each media. 

☒ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis. 

☒ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain 
onsite after construction grading.  No soil impacts are expected to remain in current 
location.   

☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.). 

☒ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction. 

☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas, 
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment. 

☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media 
applicable to the proposed redevelopment. 

☒ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final. 

☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial 
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for 
Brownfields approval. 

☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources, 

4 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
detailing the type of material proposed for import to the Brownfields Property. 

☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields 
Property.  Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Redevelopment Section 
Guidelines. 

☒ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export 
and sampling data from those areas.  See Figure 3, Table 1, and Appendix B.  

☒ If a Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) is required by the Brownfields 
Redevelopment Section, the VIMS plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional 
Engineer.  The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover. 

GENERAL INFORMATION 

Date: 7/5/2023 Revision Date (if applicable):  

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Former Bevs Touch Cleaners 

Brownfields Project Number:  26049‐22‐060 

Brownfields Property Address: 1427 South Boulevard, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina  

Brownfields Property Area (acres):  The Brownfields property consists of one parcel that is 
approximately 0.9 acre of land.  A Site location map is provided as Figure 1; and the Site and 
surrounding area are shown in Figure 2.   
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes   ☒ No 
If yes enter Permit No.:  
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes   ☒ No 
If yes, enter Permit No.:  

COMMUNICATIONS 

A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers 
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water.  Additionally, a copy of the 
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities in an area that is 
prominently accessible to site workers.  NOTE, THE EMP DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE‐SPECIFIC 
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN. 

Prospective Developer (PD): KA 1427 South Property Owner LLC  
Contact Person:  Dan Coith  
Phone Numbers:   Office: 402‐326‐5800 Mobile:   
Email: [e-mail]   

5 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  

Contractor for PD: To be determined    
Contact Person:    
Phone Numbers:   Office:    Mobile:    
Email:       

Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC    
Contact Person: Haley Martin  
Phone Numbers:   Office: 704‐786‐0007 Mobile: 704‐506‐8107   
Email: [e-mail]  

Brownfields Redevelopment Section Project Manager:  Bill Schmithorst 
Phone Numbers:   Office: 919‐707‐8159 Mobile: 919‐441‐3606   
Email: [e-mail]; [e-mail]   

Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch, 
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):  
Not applicable 

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION 

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields project manager: Check each box to accept 
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task: 

On‐site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior        ☒ 

Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior       ☒

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously 
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours   ☒

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in 
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours  ☒ 

Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior         ☒

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment 
activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days     ☒ 

6 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS 

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply): 
☒Residential ☐Townhomes (Prior written DEQ approval REQUIRED regardless of ownership 
structure) ☐Recreational ☐Institutional  ☒Commercial  ☒Office  ☒Retail  ☐Industrial 
☒Other specify: 
Proposed redevelopment of the Brownfields property includes razing the existing Site building 
and leveling the Site for construction of a high rise apartment, commercial retail, and amenities 
building, and an associated non‐enclosed parking deck.  Redevelopment activities also include 
installation of new access drives and landscaped areas.  The preliminary redevelopment plan is 
provided as Appendix A.   

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth‐moving activities 
at the site: 
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps) 
☐ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility 
lines, etc. 
☐ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors 

3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if 
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature): 
 Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building 
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:  
A copy of the most recent Site Plan prepared for the redevelopment of the Brownfields property 
is included in Appendix A.  Copies of the preliminary grading plan and cut and fill analysis are 
provided as Appendix B.  A copy of the preliminary construction schedule is provided as 
Appendix C.  As noted above, redevelopment plans include razing the existing Site building for 
development of a high rise apartment building and parking deck.  In addition to construction of 
the apartment building, redevelopment plans include construction of new access drives and 
landscaped areas.   

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?: 
   ☒ Yes  ☐ No ☐ Unknown  
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with 
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos 
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public 
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.  If available, please 
provide a copy of your demolition permit.  

5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?  
S&EC requirements can be found at: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy‐mineral‐and‐land‐
resources/erosion‐and‐sediment‐control/erosion‐and‐sediment‐control‐laws‐and‐rules 
  ☒ Yes    ☐ No    ☐ Unknown  

7 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
☒  If yes, please check here to confirm that earth‐work will be conducted in accordance with 
applicable legal requirements.  If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion 
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.  

6) Which category of risk‐based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the 
Brownfields Agreement?  Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall 
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes. 
☒ Residential   ☐ Non‐Residential or Industrial/Commercial 

7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule): 
a) Construction start date: 9/27/2023 

b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):  
Demolition: September to December 2023 
Grading: December 2023 – January 2024  
Foundations: January/February 2024 
Vertical Construction: February 2024 – October 2025 
Paving/Landscaping: September 2025 – December 2025 

c) Additional phases planned? ☐ Yes  ☒ No   

  If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:  
Start Date:   
  Planned Activity: 

Start Date:   
  Planned Activity: 

Start Date:  
  Planned Activity: 

d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 9/15/2025

CONTAMINATED MEDIA 
Please fill out the sections below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas 
of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan.  Provide a figure overlaying new 
construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations. 

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property 
Part 1. Soil:     ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown 
Part 2. Groundwater: .................................... ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown 

8 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
Part 3. Surface Water:    ☐  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown  ☒ N/A 
Part 4. Sediment: .......................................... ☐  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown  ☒ N/A 
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ......................................... ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown 
Part 6. Sub‐Slab Soil Vapor: .......................... ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown 
Part 7. Indoor Air: ......................................... ☐  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☒ Unknown 

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data 
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.  

PART 1. SOIL 
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants): 
Soil samples were collected at the Brownfields property in July 2022 during Phase II 
Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)activities completed by H&H to evaluate the potential for 
impacts associated with historical on‐Site and nearby off‐Site operations.  Soil assessment 
activities completed at the Brownfields property included collection of eight (8) soil samples for 
laboratory analysis.  A tabular summary of soil analytical data in comparison to the January 2023 
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Residential and 
Industrial/Commercial Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) is included as Table 1.  Soil 
sample locations are shown on Figures 3, and soil compound concentrations above the DEQ 
PSRGs are shown in Figure 4.  A brief summary of the results is provided below. 

Organic Compounds 
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were not detected in soil samples at concentrations above 
Residential or Industrial/Commercial PSRGs.  Semi‐VOCs (SVOCs) were not detected in soil 
samples at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limits. 

Metals 
Soil sample analytical results indicate hexavalent chromium (up to 2.99 milligrams per kilogram 
[mg/kg]) was detected above the Residential PSRG (0.31 mg/kg) in multiple samples collected at 
the Brownfields property.  Remaining detections of metals in soils at the Brownfields property 
are generally consistent with naturally occurring levels found in the general area.   

2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet): 
Soil impacts have been confirmed at depths of approximately 0‐2 feet below ground surface ( ft 
bgs). 

3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet): 
The entire Site (approximately 39,200 sq ft) is expected to be disturbed during grading and 
construction activities.  A copy of the preliminary grading plan is provided as Appendix B.  

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet): 
Based on the grading plan and cut/fill analysis, planned cut depths as part of mass grading are 
not expected to extend beyond 2.5 ft below current grade elevations.  Deeper excavations 

9 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
associated with elevator pits and foundation work may extend to depths up to approximately 70 
ft below current grade.  Copies of the preliminary grading plan and cut/fill analysis are provided 
as Appendix B.   

5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan): 
Grading and construction activities for the proposed redevelopment at the Site will generate 
approximately 852 cubic yards of cut soil (0.5 ft bgs to 2.5 ft bgs) to achieve proposed final 
grade elevations.   

6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:             
The volume of impacted soil to be excavated at the Site is unknown.  As noted in Section 1 
above, hexavalent chromium was detected at concentrations above the DEQ PSRGs and 
background concentrations at shallow depths of 0 to 2 ft bgs.  Based on review of the cut/fill 
analysis, up to 852 cubic yards of soil will be generated as part of grubbing/stripping and shallow 
grading activities.   

7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:   
It is anticipated that limited grading and leveling will result in a net import.  The PD may elect 
to export shallow soil generated during grubbing and stripping activities or deeper soil 
generated during installation of deeper foundations.  If potentially impacted soil is 
encountered and cannot be reused on‐Site as fill, it will be sampled and managed in 
accordance with the procedures described in the following sections.   

PART 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL 
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields 
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please 
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are 
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).   

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:  
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous 
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31‐261.35?....................................... ☐Yes   ☒No 
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes 
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed). 

☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained‐Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the 
North Carolina Contained‐In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes   ☐ No 

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS 
THE CONTAINED‐OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA 
CONTAINED‐IN POLICY, THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ONSITE AND MUST BE 
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND 
REGULATIONS.    

10 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
c)  Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes   ☒ No 
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results). 
☐ Ignitability  Click or tap here to enter text.               
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual 
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory 
TCLP standard)   

☒ If no, explain rationale:  
Total chromium (120 mg/kg) was detected in soil sample SB‐4 (0‐2) at a 
concentration above the Rule of 20 concentration of 100 mg/kg.  Due to the 
total chromium concentration in SB‐4, the lab also analyzed soil sample SB‐4 for 
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) chromium.  Results of TCLP 
analysis did not identify chromium at concentrations above the hazardous 
waste characteristic threshold of 5.0 milligrams per liter (mg/L) in leachate from 
the sample.  Based on results of soil assessment activities and TCLP chromium 
analysis, no compounds have been identified at characteristically hazardous 
waste levels.   

d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE 
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ONSITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH 
DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS. 

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in 
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite): 
      ☒ Preliminary Health‐Based Residential SRGs  
      ☒ Preliminary Health‐Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs  
           ☒ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only) 
    ☐ Site‐specific risk‐based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for 
determination/explanation.  

Additional comments:  

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property boundary, 
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of 
same.   Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.      

11 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields project manager. 
☐ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil onsite map to 
Brownfields project manager once known. 
☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.  
Provide description of material:  

☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒  or clean fill ☒  
☒ Describe cap or fill:  
Should potentially impacted soil or fill materials be encountered during redevelopment that 
do not require removal for geotechnical or construction purposes, the potentially impacted 
soil may be placed beneath impervious surfaces (asphalt pavement, sidewalks, access 
roads, buildings, etc.) or a minimum of 2 ft of clean fill.  

☒ Confer with NC BF project manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re‐recorded if 
actions are Post‐Recordation).  
☒ GPS the location and provide site map with final location. 
☐ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:  

4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and 
management of site soils: 
☒ Check to confirm that management of fugitive dust from site activities will be handled in 
accordance with applicable local, state, and federal requirements.   

Field screening of site soil 
At a minimum, contractors shall be made aware of protocols should impacted soils (e.g. staining, 
unusual odors, fill materials) be identified.  

Describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting field 
screening:  
During soil disturbance at the Site, the workers or contractors will observe soils for 
evidence of potential impacts.  Evidence of potentially impacted soil includes a distinct 
unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e., 
chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.).  Should the above be noted during Site work, the 
contractor will contact the project environmental professional to observe the suspect 
condition.  If the project environmental professional confirms that the material may be 
impacted, then the procedures below will be implemented.  In addition, the DEQ 
Brownfields project manager will be contacted within 48 hours to advise of the condition.   

Soil sample collection 
☐ Yes 

12 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
☒ Not anticipated ‐ In order to avoid delays in construction, a plan shall be in place for sampling 
of suspect soils should they be encountered during redevelopment.  If soil sample collection is 
not anticipated but the need to do so is identified during redevelopment, notify the Brownfields 
project manager of the anticipated sample and report dates for scheduling purposes.   
Describe the sampling method (e.g., in‐situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.) and confirm that all 
procedures outlined in applicable DEQ guidance for assessment shall be followed.  Typically, at 
least one representative sample (per 500 yd3 for residential and 1,000 yd3 for commercial) 
consisting of a 3 to 5‐point composite sample with grab sample for VOCs based on the highest PID 
reading is required to determine soil management options:  
Collection of additional soil samples is not anticipated based on results of previous Site 
assessment activities.  If previously unknown significant soil impact is encountered during 
grading and/or installation or removal of utilities, excavation will proceed only as far as needed 
to allow grading and/or construction of the utility to continue and/or only as far as needed to 
allow alternate corrective measures described below.   

Suspect impacted soil excavated during grading and/or utility line installation or removal may be 
stockpiled and covered in a secure area to allow construction to progress.  Suspect impacted soil 
will be underlain by and covered with minimum 10‐mil plastic sheeting.  At least one 
representative composite soil sample (targeting 5 aliquot soil samples) at a sample ratio of 1 soil 
sample per every approximately 1,000 cubic yards of soil will be collected for the analyses 
selected below (i.e., total VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium).  This 
sampling frequency considers the general absence of contaminants demonstrated in Brownfields 
assessment soil data.  The VOC sample would be a grab sample of the aliquot with the highest 
evidence of impact based on field screening.  If the soil sample laboratory analytical results 
indicate that the soil could potentially exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria, 
then the soil will also be analyzed by TCLP for those compound classes that could exceed the 
toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria.   

Newly identified impacted soil uncovered during grading will be managed in the manner 
described below based upon the laboratory analyses:     

i. If no organic compounds are detected in a sample (other than which are attributable to 
sampling or laboratory artifacts) and metals are below the Protection of Groundwater or 
Residential PSRG (whichever is lower for the detected compounds) and are consistent 
with Site‐specific background levels with acceptable cumulative risk calculator results, 
then the soil will be deemed suitable for use as on‐Site fill or as off‐Site fill.  The 
proposed location(s) for off‐Site placement of soil (other than a permitted facility) along 
with the receiving property’s written approval for acceptance of the soil will be provided 
to DEQ for approval prior to taking the soil off‐Site.   
ii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which are below DEQ Residential PSRGs or 
are at acceptable levels (LICR <1.0 x 10‐4 and HI <1.0) based on the DEQ risk calculator 
(other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are 
consistent with Site‐specific background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations, 
if necessary and analyzed for TCLP, are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil may 
be used on‐Site as fill.  If VOCs or other vapor intrusion risks are suspected based on the 

13 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
soil concentrations, the soil will not be placed under the footprint of the building.   
iii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the DEQ Residential PSRGs, 
the DEQ risk calculator results are above acceptable levels (other than which are 
attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with background 
levels for metals) and the soil is not hazardous waste, then the soil, with DEQ written 
approval, may be used on‐Site as fill below an impervious surface, or at least 2 ft of 
documented compacted clean soil.  If VOCs or other vapor intrusion risks are suspected 
based on the soil concentrations, the soil will not be placed under the footprint of the 
building. If impacted soil with concentrations above acceptable cumulative risk calculator 
results is moved to an on‐Site location, its location and depth will be documented, and 
its location will be provided to DEQ.   
iv. Impacted soil may be transported to a DEQ permitted facility such as a Subtitle D lined 
landfill or permitted impacted soil landfarm provided that the soil is accepted at the 
disposal facility.  If soil is transported to a permitted facility, the permitted facility’s 
written approval or acceptance to dispose of soil from the Site will be included with the 
final redevelopment report.  In the unlikely event that the sample data indicate 
concentrations above TCLP hazardous waste criteria, then the soil will be managed as 
hazardous waste.  Additional approvals from DEQ are not required to execute disposal 
per item iv.   
*Please note that should the PD elect to transport export soil to a permitted facility or to a DEQ 
Brownfields pre‐approved receiving facility, soil will be direct loaded onto trucks for transport 
off‐Site. 

Check applicable chemical analytes for soil samples: 
☒ Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 
8260; Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA 
List + Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199 

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides): 

☒ Check to confirm that by the owner’s signature and the North Carolina Professional 
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect 
soil sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the 
sealing professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines and 
methodologies are followed and reported to DEQ for determination and approval of soil 
placement prior to final relocation.  

If impacted soils above applicable PSRGs and/or site‐specific risk thresholds are proposed to 
be relocated on‐site, prior to final placement on‐site, the following shall be submitted for DEQ 
review/approval 

14 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
‐ Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the above referenced frequency and 
following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields Redevelopment Section 
Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum Requirements Checklist (Checklist) and in 
accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of Contaminated Sites 
(Guidelines) 
‐ Figure outlining planned soil placement and any future site features including 
buildings/hardscape/open areas 
‐ A North Carolina PE/PG recommendation of placement 

Impacts 
Options 
Onsite Placement without 
conditions 
Onsite placement under 2 ft 
of cap or clean fill1, 2 
All constituents below applicable 
PSRGs or acceptable risk calculator 
results  
X  
Constituents3 below applicable 
PSRGs; metals below background 
but above PSRGs 
X  
Constituents3 below applicable 
PSRGs; metals above background 
and PSRGs 
 X 
Constituents above applicable 
PSRGs or acceptable risk calculator 
results  
 X 
1: Requires Prior Written DEQ Approval 
2: VOC impacted soils above applicable PSRGs shall not be placed directly beneath building footprints 
without prior written DEQ approval. 
3: Constituents indicate compounds other than metals. 

☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted in 
accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP.  Stockpile methodology should provide erosion control, 
prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing 
contaminated runoff.  Explain any variances or provide additional details as needed: 

☐ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or 
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes below 
(Check all that apply): 
☐ Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 
8260; Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA 
List + Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199 

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  

15 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides): 

Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil 
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.  
Samples should be collected from 0‐2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs 
which should be taken from 1‐2 ft below ground surface.  Alternatively, indicate if a work 
plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover. 

☒ If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale: 
Based on the proposed redevelopment plan and lack of impacts to Site soil above 
background levels, final grade soil sampling is not recommended.  Following completion of 
soil disturbance for future Site development (i.e., after grading and utility construction), an 
environmental professional will assess the Site for areas that will not be covered upon 
completion of the redevelopment with a minimum of 2 ft of documented clean fill soil 
and/or landscaping materials, building foundations, sidewalks, asphalt or concrete parking 
areas and driveways, or other similar impervious areas (e.g., tightly spaced pavers or 
bricks).  If such areas exist, a Work Plan will be prepared for final grade soil sampling for 
DEQ Brownfields review and approval.   

PART 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL 

NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM 
THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION.  According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting 
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written approval 
in advance by the Brownfields Redevelopment Section), will safeguard the liability protections 
provided by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective 
developer/property owner.” 

Requirements for importing fill: 
☒ Check to confirm that the import volumes outlined below have been confirmed based on 
geotechnical evaluations. 

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☒ Yes  ☐ No  ☐ Unknown 

2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?  
Based on conversations with the PD, the preliminary grading plan, and the preliminary cut/fill 
analysis, grading is expected to result in a net import.  According to the preliminary cut/fill 
analysis, approximately 830 cubic yards of soil will need to be imported to the Site to reach final 
grade elevations. 

16 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range 
of depths, list the range.) 
In general, fill areas associated with the proposed redevelopment are located across the entire 
Site (Appendix B).  The thickness of the planned fill ranges up to approximately 1.5 ft. 

PRIOR TO SOIL PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, a Soil Import Request must be 
submitted for DEQ Brownfields review and approval. The request shall consist of a data 
package that details:  

‐ Fill source location/history (Phase I if available, current aerials, etc.) 
‐ Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the below frequency and 
following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields Redevelopment Section 
Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum Requirements Checklist (Checklist) 
and in accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of 
Contaminated Sites (Guidelines) 
‐ A table comparing the import soil to existing site concentrations 
‐ A PE/PG recommendation of import 
‐ All relevant attachments listed in the Checklist 

Soil Import Sampling Requirements: 
Source Sample Frequency Sample Analysis 
Virgin Material from DEQ 
Brownfields Pre‐
approved Quarry 
None (Contact Brownfields project manager for list of pre‐
approved Quarries) 
DEQ Permitted Quarry 
(Not Brownfields Pre‐
approved) 
At least one 
representative sample 
from area of planned 
import 
VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA 
Metals, any site specific 
COCs (e.g. pesticides, 
PCBs, etc.) 
Other NC DEQ 
Brownfields Property 
At least one 
representative sample 
per 1,000 yd3 consisting 
of a 3‐point composite 
sample with grab sample 
for VOCs based on the 
highest PID reading 
VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA 
Metals, any site specific 
COCs (e.g. pesticides, 
PCBs, etc.) 
Off‐site 
unpermitted/regulated 
property 
Bulk Landscape Material 
from Commercial Vendor 
(i.e. topsoil) 
No Sampling Required 

If other special considerations apply, discuss:  

☒ Check to confirm that by the owner’s signature and the North Carolina Professional 
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect soil 
sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the sealing 
professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines are followed and reported in 
the Soil Import Request for DEQ approval. Failure to meet these requirements could result in 
resampling and/or failure to approve import.   

17 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
PART 1.C. SOIL EXPORT 

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE 
BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION.  Failure to obtain approval may violate a brownfields 
agreement causing a reopener or jeopardizing eligibility in the Section, endangering liability 
protections and making said action possibly subject to enforcement.  Justifications provided 
below must be approved by the Section in writing prior to completing transport activities.  Refer 
to Brownfields IR 15 for additional details.  

1) If export from the Brownfields Property is anticipated, export soil must be sampled at a 
frequency of one sample per 1,000 yd3 consisting of a 3‐point composite sample with a 
grab sample for VOCs based on the highest PID reading.  Samples shall be analyzed at a 
minimum for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals plus any site specific COCs.   

PRIOR TO EXPORT FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, a Soil Export Request must be 
submitted for DEQ Brownfields review and approval. The request shall consist of a Data 
Package that details:  

‐ Proposed Receiving Facility 
‐ Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the above referenced 
frequency and following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields 
Redevelopment Section Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum 
Requirements Checklist (Checklist) and in accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for 
Assessment and Cleanup of Contaminated Sites (Guidelines) 
‐ A table comparing the export soil to concentrations on the receiving site concentrations 
including risk comparison (Note that calculated risk cannot be increased on the receiving 
site) 
‐ A North Carolina PE/PG recommendation of export 
‐ Written approval from the receiving site property owner representative for export 
‐ All relevant attachments listed in the Checklist 

Soil Export Options 
Impacts 
Options 
Use as 
Beneficial Fill 
Off‐site disposal at 
other Brownfields 
Property2,6,7 
Off‐site disposal 
at LCID/CD 
Landfill1, 3 
Off‐site disposal at Subtitle 
D MSW/Permitted 
Landfarm4 
All Constituents below 
applicable PSRGs X X X X 
Constituents5 below 
applicable PSRGs; Metals 
below background but 
above PSRGs 
 X X X 
Constituents5 below 
applicable PSRGs; Metals 
above Background /PSRGs 
 X X X 
Constituents above 
Applicable PSRGs  X  X 

18 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
1: Requires Prior Written DEQ Approval 
2: VOC impacted soils above applicable PSRGs shall not be placed directly beneath building footprints 
without prior written DEQ approval. 
3: Requires comparison to site specific metals concentrations. 
4: Facility to determine if they can accept soil within their permit. 
5: Constituents indicate any samples evaluated for other than metals. 
6: Requires written approval from receiving site property owner representative. 
7. Site COCs must be in comparable concentrations to receiving site and not significantly raise risk of 
the receiving site. 

☒ Check to confirm that by the owner’s signature and the North Carolina Professional 
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect soil 
sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the sealing 
professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines are followed and reported in 
the Soil Export Request for DEQ approval. Failure to meet these requirements could result in 
resampling and/or failure to approve export.  

If other special considerations apply, discuss:  

PART 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES 

☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill 
(Preferred) 

☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a 
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were 
removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth 
from which it was excavated. 

☒ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, 
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants. 
☒ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials or provide the results of this evaluation in the 
Vapor Mitigation Plan. Note that if vapor mitigation is planned for site buildings, utility corridors 
will need to be evaluated as part of mitigation designs: 
The PD plans to install a passive vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) during construction of 
the multi‐family building.  As part of the VIMS design, the locations of sub‐grade utilities will be 
evaluated to determine if utility trench dams may be warranted to mitigate potential 
contaminated vapor migration.  The Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Plan will be submitted under 
separate cover.   

☐ If no, include rationale here: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☒ Unknown, details to be provided in the Vapor Mitigation Plan for site buildings 

19 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:  
The contractor and workers will observe soil for potential impacts during utility installation 
activities.  Evidence of potentially impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, unexpected 
chemical or petroleum odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e., 
chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.).  Should the above be noted during utility work, the contractor will 
contact Hart & Hickman to observe the suspect condition.  If Hart & Hickman confirms that the 
material may be impacted, then the procedures outlined in Managing On‐Site Soil above will be 
implemented.  In addition, Hart & Hickman will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager 
within 48 hours to advise that person of the condition. 

Should impacted soil be discovered during utility trenching activities, appropriate safety 
screening will be performed to protect workers during utility installation activities.  Safety 
screening activities include monitoring the worker breathing zone with a calibrated 
photoionization detector or similar instrument when workers are in utility trenches.  If safety 
screening results indicate further action is warranted, the work zone will be evacuated until 
appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) are implemented. 

PART 2. GROUNDWATER  

1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property? 
During groundwater assessment activities completed at the Site, depth to groundwater ranged 
from approximately 19 ft bgs in higher areas in the northern portion of the Brownfields 
property to approximately 20 ft bgs in lower lying areas located in the central and southern 
portions of the Brownfields property. 

2) What is the maximum depth of soil disturbance onsite?  
The maximum excavation depth is estimated to be approximately 5 ft at proposed elevator 
pits.  Additionally, deep foundation caissons will be installed to depths of up to 70 ft bgs at the 
Site.  The soil cuttings from the caissons will be managed in accordance with Section 1 of this 
EMP.  It is noted that no chlorinated solvents were detected in saturated zone sample SB‐4 
(26‐28 ft).  See below for groundwater management procedures. 

3) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☐onsite  ☒offsite   ☐both or ☐unknown 
sources?  Describe source(s):  
Previous groundwater assessment at the Brownfields property included collection of four (4) 
groundwater samples for laboratory analysis.  Locations of the groundwater samples are shown 
on Figures 3.  A tabular summary of groundwater sample laboratory analytical results is included 
in Table 3.  Compound concentrations exceeding the DEQ NCAC 15A 2L Groundwater Quality 
Standard (2L Standard) and/or the DEQ Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSLs) 
are shown in Figure 4.  A brief summary of the groundwater assessment results is provided 
below. 

VOCs and SVOCs 
Groundwater sample analytical results indicate that VOCs cis‐1,2‐dichloroethene (up to 682 

20 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
micrograms per liter [µg/L), 1,1‐dichloroethane (up to 8.3 µg/L), methylene chloride (up to 36.1 
C9 µg/L, trichloroethene or TCE (up to 118 µg/L), and tetrachloroethene or PCE (up to 612 µg/L) 
were detected above the 2L Standards in the TMW‐2/GW‐DUP samples, which were collected 
cross‐gradient from the former McCorkles Cleaners (DSCA Site DC600077) dry‐cleaning facility.  
VOCs 1,1‐dichloroethane, PCE, and TCE were also detected above the Residential and/or Non‐
Residential Vapor Intrusion GWSLs in groundwater samples TMW‐2/GW‐DUP.  PCE and related 
chlorinated VOCs were not detected above the Vapor Intrusion GWSLs in the remaining 
groundwater samples collected at the Site.  Based on the groundwater flow direction and the 
location where chlorinated VOCs were detected, the source of the chlorinated solvents is not 
originating on the Site.   

No other VOCs were detected at concentrations above the 2L Standards or Residential and Non‐
Residential Vapor Intrusion GWSLs in groundwater samples collected at the Site.  No SVOCs were 
detected at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limits. 

Metals 
Metals were not detected at concentrations above the 2L Standards or Vapor Intrusion GWSLs.   

4) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?  
Shallow groundwater is expected to mimic surface topography which slopes generally 
east/southeast in the northern and southern portions of the Site (Figure 1).   

5) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities (e.g. 
footer/utility construction or helical pilings?)   
☒Yes    ☐No  
If yes, describe these activities: 
Groundwater was encountered approximately 19 to 20 ft bgs at the Brownfields property.  
Grading activities will not result in a decreased surface elevation and are proposed to reach 
depths of 0.5 to 2.5 ft bgs in the northern and southern portions of the Site.  The deepest 
trenches for utility installations are proposed for 5 to 8 ft bgs following grading.  Deeper 
excavations associated with elevator pits and foundation work (including caissons) may extend 
to depths up to approximately 70 ft below current grade.  Therefore, encountering 
groundwater during foundation installation is anticipated.   

In the event that groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if no is 
checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering 
of groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to 
sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or sampling procedures).  
Groundwater generated during dewatering activities in the southern portion of the Site will be 
transferred to an approved frac tank or other enclosed containers such as a 55‐gallon drum 
depending on the volume of water within the chlorinated solvent water management area as 
depicted on Figure 3 and Figure 4.  Because the source of the PCE appears to be the McCorkles 
Cleaners, the containers will be staged within a temporary double‐walled secondary 
containment system or a lined and bermed secondary containment system and will be managed 
as listed hazardous waste unless laboratory analysis demonstrates that drycleaning solvents are 
not present in the water.  If concentrations of dry‐cleaning solvents are detected above 
laboratory reporting limits, water within the container will be transported off‐Site for disposal 

21 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
at a facility permitted to accept/treat hazardous waste.   

If results of samples collected from the containerized water do not contain dry‐cleaner solvents 
at concentrations above the laboratory reporting limits and remaining compound 
concentrations are below the 2L Standards and DEQ 2B Surface Water Standards (2B 
Standards), water will be transported off‐Site as non‐hazardous waste, re‐used on‐Site as dust 
control, or discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ surface water standards) 
in accordance with applicable municipal and State regulations for erosion control and 
construction stormwater control. 

Appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken if groundwater gathers in an open 
excavation within an area determined to be impacted (based on previous sampling data, strong 
odor, unnatural color, sheen, etc.) during construction activities.  The contractor will contact the 
environmental professional to observe the area(s) suspected to be impacted.  The accumulated 
water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent time for dissipation does not disrupt 
the construction schedule.  Should the time needed for natural dissipation of accumulated 
water be deemed inadequate, the water will be tested for the presence of VOCs, SVOCs, and 
RCRA metals and disposed off‐site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if 
not impacted above DEQ surface water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and 
State regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control.  Equipment that has 
been in contact with saturated soil within the chlorinated solvent water management area as 
depicted on Figure 3 and Figure 4 will be rinsed before leaving the Brownfields Property. 

6) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☐Yes   ☒No    
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other 
agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes   ☐No  

7) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously 
unidentified wells.   
☒ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations.  It 
is the Brownfields Redevelopment Section’s intent to allow proper abandonment of 
well(s) as specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active 
monitoring through another section of DEQ or the EPA.   
☐ Location of existing monitoring wells marked 
☐ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance  
☒ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further 
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for 
abandonment is given. 

8) Please provide additional details as needed:   

The PD is not aware of existing monitoring wells located on the Brownfields property.  DEQ will be 
notified if newly identified monitoring wells are found on the Brownfields property.  

22 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not 
permissible.  If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD 
be responsible for replacement of the well.   

PART 3. SURFACE WATER 
1) Is surface water present at the property?  ☐ Yes ☒ No  
2) If yes, attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property 
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes  ☒ No  ☐ Unknown 
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment 
activities or as part of the final redevelopment?    ☐ Yes  ☒ No 
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment 
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of 
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run‐off, stormwater impacts): 
If surface water run‐off gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted 
during construction activities, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken.  The 
accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent that the time for 
dissipation does not disrupt the construction schedule.  Should the time needed for natural 
dissipation of accumulated water be deemed inadequate, the water will be tested and disposed 
off‐Site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ 
surface water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and State regulations for 
erosion control and construction stormwater control.   

PART 4. SEDIMENT 
1) Are sediment sources present on the property?  ☐ Yes  ☒ No 
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes  ☐ No ☐ Unknown 
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment 
activities?   ☐ Yes ☒ No 
4) Attach a map showing the location of known contaminated sediment at the property. 
5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance): 
Not applicable. 

PART 5.  SOIL VAPOR 

1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the 
vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media: 

 Groundwater Exterior Soil Vapor Sub‐Slab Soil Vapor 
Residential ☒ Yes ☐ No   
☐ Unknown 
☒ Yes ☐ No   
☐ Unknown 
☐ Yes ☒ No   
☐ Unknown 

23 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
Commercial ☒ Yes ☐ No   
☐ Unknown 
☐ Yes ☒ No   
☐ Unknown 
☐ Yes ☒ No   
☐ Unknown 

2) Attach a map showing the locations of all soil vapor samples including any soil vapor 
contaminants that exceeds screening levels and overlays planned site development features.  

3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is exterior soil vapor known to be contaminated?  

4) If applicable, at what depth(s) is sub‐slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? 
☐0‐6 inches ☒Other, please describe:   
Assessment activities previously completed at the Site included collection of two (2) sub‐slab 
vapor samples within existing Site buildings in July 2022.  A tabular summary of the sub‐slab vapor 
sample laboratory analytical results is provided in Table 3, and locations of the sub‐slab vapor 
samples are shown on Figure 3 and Figure 4.   

Several VOCs were detected in sub‐slab vapor samples at concentrations above the laboratory 
method detection limits, but below Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSLs. 

As noted above, results of worst‐case risk calculations do not indicate a significant vapor intrusion 
concern for a residential or non‐residential use scenario.  However, as indicated above, the PD 
intends to install a VIMS during construction of the Site building. 
H&H collected four (4) exterior soil gas samples for laboratory analysis in July 2022.  The soil gas 
samples were collected at approximately 6 ft bgs within the footprint of the proposed retail and 
amenity spaces to evaluate the potential for structural vapor intrusion.  Soil gas sample locations are 
shown on Figures 3 and 4, and a tabular summary of the laboratory analytical data is provided in 
Table 3. 

As shown in Table 3, the VOC benzene (up to 20 micrograms per cubic meter [µg/m3] was detected in 
the four (4) exterior soil gas samples at concentrations exceeding the Residential Vapor Intrusion Sub‐
Slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs).  Chloroform (up to 31 µg/m3) was also detected in 
soil gas samples SG‐2 and SG‐3 at concentrations above the Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSL.  
Ethylbenzene (up to 77 µg/m3) was detected in soil gas samples SG‐1 and SG‐3 at concentrations 
exceeding the Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSL.  No other VOCs were detected at concentrations 
exceeding the Vapor Intrusion SGSLs. 

Hypothetical worst‐case residential use scenario risk calculator results for the soil gas to indoor air 
vapor intrusion pathway (LICR 1.5 x 10‐5 and HI 0.33) did not exceed the target threshold values for 
cumulative carcinogenic or noncarcinogenic risks.  Although results of residential risk calculations do 
not exceed the target threshold values, the PD intends to proactively install a DEQ Brownfields 
approved VIMS designed by a North Carolina licensed Professional Engineer during construction of 
the proposed apartment building.  The vapor intrusion mitigation plan will be provided as a separate 
document.   

24 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  

5) Will workers encounter contaminated exterior or sub‐slab soil vapor during planned 
redevelopment activities?  ☐ Yes  ☐ No ☒ Unknown   
In the event that apparent contaminated soil vapor is encountered (based on elevated PID 
readings, unusual odors, etc.) during redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or 
other subsurface work,) list activities for management of such contact, INCLUDING notification to 
DEQ within 48 hours of identification of the issue for determination of additional requirements:  
If impacted soil vapors are encountered during future redevelopment activities, worker 
breathing zones will be monitored using a calibrated photoionization detector by an 
environmental professional.  If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate 
engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.   

PART 6. INDOOR AIR 

1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes   ☒ No 
2) If applicable, attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site 
screening levels. 
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk‐based screening levels will 
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated 
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Unknown  ☒ N/A 

☒ If no, include rationale here: 
As indicated above, sub‐slab vapor sample analysis within the existing commercial building did 
not indicate the presence of a vapor intrusion concern.  Further, the Site will be razed as part of 
the proposed redevelopment.  
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such contact: 

VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM 
1) Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property? 
☒ Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Unknown 

☐ If no or unknown, include rationale here as well as plans for pre‐occupancy sampling, as 
necessary: 

If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☒ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately   
In the unlikely event there is evidence of potential indoor air issues (i.e., unusual odors) during 
redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated, and appropriate safety screening of the 
indoor air will be performed.  If warranted, safety screening procedures will include periodically 
screening of indoor air for volatile organic vapors with a calibrated photoionization detector when 
workers are present in the Site buildings.  If results indicate further action is warranted, 
appropriate engineering controls (such as the use of industrial fans) will be implemented.  

25 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
If submitted separately provide date:  
The PD intends to install a DEQ Brownfields approved passive vapor intrusion mitigation system 
designed by a North Carolina licensed Professional Engineer during construction of the proposed 
apartment and retail building.   

VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer and follow the DEQ 
Brownfields Redevelopment Section’s Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System Design Submittal 
Requirements. 

Note that approval of this EMP does not imply approval with any vapor intrusion mitigation land 
use restrictions or requirements of the recorded or draft Brownfields Agreement and that 
separate approval of mitigation measures will be required.  

CONTINGENCY PLAN  

In this section, please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown 
potential new sources of contamination.   During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon 
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.  
Notification to DEQ Brownfields project manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other 
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of 
contamination are discovered.  These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this 
EMP.   

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site 
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields project manager will be notified, and a sampling plan will be 
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site‐specific factors.  Samples will generally be 
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.   

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases: 
☒ Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260; 
Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA List + 
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199 

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  

☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides) 
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should 
be conducted, even if not listed here.  

Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly 
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties. 

26 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
During construction activities, contractors may encounter unknown sub‐surface environmental 
conditions (i.e., tanks, drums, or waste materials) that if encountered, will require proper 
management.  Prior to beginning Site work, H&H will attend a pre‐construction kick‐off meeting 
with the PD and the redevelopment contractors to discuss the DEQ approved EMP and various 
scenarios when it would be appropriate and necessary to notify H&H of the discovery of unknown 
subsurface features or potentially impacted media at the Site. 

In the event that such conditions are encountered during site development activities, the following 
environmental actions noted below will be used.  Sampling data for potentially impacted soil and 
the disposition of impacted soil will be provided to DEQ when the data become available. 

Underground Storage Tanks – Note that UST Section guidelines must be followed for sample 
frequency during UST closure. Unless damage to onsite structures to remain as part of 
redevelopment would occur, USTs shall be removed from the Brownfields Property: 
In the event a UST or impacts associated with a UST release are discovered at the Site during 
redevelopment activities, the UST and/or UST‐related impacts will be addressed through DEQ 
Brownfields.  DEQ Brownfields will be notified within 48 hours of discovery of the UST. 

If a UST is encountered, the UST will be pumped out and removed, if possible.  The UST will be 
transported off‐Site for disposal at a suitable facility.  If the UST contains residual fluids, the fluids 
will be removed, sampled for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals, and transported off‐site for disposal 
at a suitable facility based on the laboratory analytical results.  If a UST is encountered that cannot 
be removed or does not require removal for geotechnical or construction purposes, it may be 
abandoned in‐place with prior DEQ approval and construction will proceed.  Where appropriate, the 
bottom may be penetrated before abandonment to prevent fluid accumulation.  Impacted soil in 
the vicinity of the UST will be managed in accordance with the Managing On‐Site Soil section 
outlined above in the EMP. 

Following UST removal or closure in place, closure soil sampling will be performed in general 
accordance with the DEQ UST Section guidelines.   

Sub‐Grade Feature/Pit: 
If a sub‐grade feature or pit is encountered and does not require removal for geotechnical or 
construction purposes, it will be filled with soil or suitable fill and construction will proceed.  Where 
appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before back filling to prevent fluid accumulation.  If the 
pit has waste in it, the waste will be set aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste 
disposal purposes for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, and TCLP metals and disposed off‐site at a permitted 
facility or the waste will be managed in accordance with the Managing On‐Site Soil section outlined 
above in the EMP, whichever is most applicable based on the type of waste present.  If the pit must 
be removed and the observed waste characteristics indicate the concrete may potentially be 
contaminated to a significant degree, the concrete will be sampled and analyzed by methods 
specified by the disposal facility.   

27 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  
Buried Waste Material – Note that if buried waste, non‐native fill, or any obviously filled materials 
is encountered, the DEQ Brownfields Redevelopment Section must be notified to determine if 
investigation of landfill gases is required: 
If excavation into buried wastes or significantly impacted soils occurs, the contractor is instructed to 
stop work in that location and notify the environmental consultant.   The environmental consultant 
will review the materials and collect samples, if warranted.  In this event, confirmation sampling will 
be conducted at representative locations in the base and the sidewalls of the excavation after the 
waste or significantly impacted soil is removed.  The confirmation samples will be analyzed for 
VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals.  Areas of suspected contaminated soil that remain at the Site after 
excavation is complete above the DEQ Residential PSRGs will be managed pursuant to this plan.   

Re‐Use of Impacted Soils Onsite: 
Please refer to description outlined in the Managing On‐Site Soil section of the EMP above. 

If unknown, impacted soil is identified onsite, management onsite can be considered after the 
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields 
project manager approval prior to final placement onsite.  

If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as 
needed below: 

POST‐REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING 

☒  Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the 
project.  If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be 
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one‐year anniversary of the effective date of 
this EMP (as agreed upon with the project manager).  These reports will be required for as long as 
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final 
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of 
redevelopment.  Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary 
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 1/31/2024, unless another date is specified in the 
recorded Brownfields Agreement for this Brownfields Property.   

The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment‐related activities since the last 
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:  
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;   
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;  
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of 
environmental media;  
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and 
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed 
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and  

29 
EMP Version 3, March 2023  

Tables
Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical DataFormer Bevs Touch Cleaners Charlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. AKR-008Evaluation AreaSample IDSB-1 SB-2 SB-3SB-5Date7/12/2022 7/12/2022 7/12/20227/11/2022Depth (ft bgs)0-2 0-2 0-2 0-2 0-2 26-28 8-10Sample Type Range Mean RangeUnitsVOCs (8260D)Acetone<0.04530.0414 J<0.05380.0502 J 0.0526 J<0.0368 <0.044514,000 210,000-- -- -- --2-Butanone (MEK) 0.0481 J 0.0452 J 0.0604 J 0.0489 J 0.0462 J 0.0550 J 0.0391 J 5,500 40,000-- -- -- --Ethylbenzene<0.0033 <0.0029 <0.0039 <0.00350.0042 J 0.0029 J 0.0035 J 6.1 27-- -- -- --Tetrachloroethene<0.0022 <0.0019 <0.0026 <0.00240.0060 J<0.0018 <0.002217 82-- -- -- --Xylene (Total) 0.0071 J<0.0035 <0.0048 <0.00430.0185 0.0051 J 0.0136 J 120 530-- -- -- --m&p-Xylene<0.0048 <0.0042 <0.0057 <0.00520.0082 J<0.00390.0066 J 120 500-- -- -- --o-Xylene 0.0071<0.0027 <0.0037 <0.00330.0103 0.0051 J 0.0070 140 590-- -- -- --SVOCs (8270E)ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL NA ALL BDL -- -- -- -- -- --Metals (6020B/7471B/7199)Arsenic2.80.901.1 2.7 1.9NA0.24 J0.68 3.0--1.0 - 18 4.8 2.93 - 4.02Barium207192121 77.3 68.4NA63.83,100 47,000--50 - 1,000 356 19.6 - 44.8Cadmium <0.0340.047 J<0.0350.040 J<0.034 NA <0.0341.4 20--1.0 - 10 4.3<0.106 - 0.135 JChromium (total)51.726.826.2 120 87.9NA2.0 JNE NE--7.0 - 300 65 65.2 - 7.2Chromium (VI)0.964 J<0.2880.396 J 2.99 1.80NA <0.3160.31 6.5--NS NS<0.323 - <0.338Chromium (III)50.7426.5125.80 117.01 86.1NA1.6823,000 350,000--NS NS 72.2 - 65.2Lead2.51.77.4 17.1 16.8NA1.9400 800--ND - 50 16 11.2 - 17.3Mercury0.012 J<0.00930.029 0.062 0.051NA <0.00944.7 70--0.03 - 0.52 0.121 0.0953 - 0.0962Selenium 0.51 J 0.16 J 0.32 J 0.52 J 0.53 JNA<0.1278 1,200--<0.1 - 0.8 0.42 0.980 - 1.310Silver<0.24 <0.21 <0.24 <0.23 <0.24NA<0.2378 1,200--ND - 5.0 NS<0.196 - <0.205 Metals (6010D TCLP)ChromiumNA NA NA <0.0037 mg/L NA NA NA-- --5.0 mg/L-- -- --Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2023.2) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Toxicity Characteristic Hazardous Waste Threshold Level obtained from the EPA Hazardous Waste Characteristics Reference Document (dated October 2009).3) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005; Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils.4) Background metals data collected from Woodlawn Green Brownfields property (Brownfields Project No. 22023-18-060). Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) unless otherwise noted.Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.With the exception of metals, only constituents detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Composite soil samples that were analyzed for VOCs were collected from undisturbed portions of soil and placed directly into laboratory supplied glassware.Bold values exceed the Residential PSRGs and background levels in the case of metals. VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-VOCs; ft bgs= feet below ground surface; mg/L= milligrams per liter; NS = not specified; NE = not established; -- = not applicableJ = Compound was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. Screening Criteriamg/kgResidential PSRGS (1)GrabIndustrial/Commercial PSRGS (1)Maximum Concentration for TCLP (2)Background Metals on Nearby Brownfields Properties (4)Regional Background Metals in Soil (3)Northwestern Portion of Site Cross-Gradient of Former McCorkles CleanersSB-4/SB-DUP-17/11/2022https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Akridge/AKR.008 1427 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Data TablesTable 1 (Page 1 of 2)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical DataFormer Bevs Touch Cleaners Charlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. AKR-008Evaluation AreaSample IDSB-6 SB-7Date7/12/2022 7/11/2022Depth (ft bgs)0-2 0-2Sample Type Range Mean Range UnitsVOCs (8260D)Acetone 0.0996 J<0.0572 <0.0476 <0.048514,000 210,000-- -- -- --2-Butanone (MEK) 0.128 J 0.0569 J 0.0443 J 0.0485 J 5,500 40,000-- -- -- --Ethylbenzene<0.00450.0048 J<0.00350.0043 J 6.1 27-- -- -- --Tetrachloroethene<0.0030 <0.0028 <0.0023 <0.002417 82-- -- -- --Xylene (Total) 0.0188 J 0.0182<0.01480.0094 J 120 530-- -- -- --m&p-Xylene 0.0091 J 0.0087 J<0.0148 <0.0052120 500-- -- -- --o-Xylene 0.0098 0.0095<0.00330.0094 140 590-- -- -- --SVOCs (8270E)ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL -- -- -- -- -- --Metals (6020B/7471B/7199)Arsenic1.3 1.7 3.4 1.60.68 3.0--1.0 - 18 4.8 2.93 - 4.02Barium243 31.3 84.3 48.93,100 47,000--50 - 1,000 356 19.6 - 44.8Cadmium 0.053 J<0.0380.13 0.051 J1.4 20--1.0 - 10 4.3<0.106 - 0.135 JChromium (total)46.2 36.2 35.6 21.9NE NE--7.0 - 300 65 65.2 - 7.2Chromium (VI)0.439 J 0.385 J 0.665 J 0.756 J0.31 6.5--NS NS<0.323 - <0.338Chromium (III)45.76 35.82 34.94 21.1423,000 350,000--NS NS 72.2 - 65.2Lead17.7 7.2 53.0 22.7400 800--ND - 50 16 11.2 - 17.3Mercury0.024 0.016 J 0.062 0.0714.7 70--0.03 - 0.52 0.121 0.0953 - 0.0962Selenium0.65 0.54 J0.42 J 0.34 J 78 1,200--<0.1 - 0.8 0.42 0.980 - 1.310Silver<0.26 <0.26<0.25 <0.2578 1,200--ND - 5.0 NS<0.196 - <0.205 Metals (6010D TCLP)ChromiumNA NA NA NA-- --5.0 mg/L-- -- --Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2023.2) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Toxicity Characteristic Hazardous Waste Threshold Level obtained from the EPA Hazardous Waste Characteristics Reference Document (dated October 2009).3) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005; Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils.4) Background metals data collected from Woodlawn Green Brownfields property (Brownfields Project No. 22023-18-060). Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) unless otherwise noted.Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.With the exception of metals, only constituents detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Composite soil samples that were analyzed for VOCs were collected from undisturbed portions of soil and placed directly into laboratory supplied glassware.Bold values exceed the Residential PSRGs and background levels in the case of metals. VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-VOCs; ft bgs= feet below ground surface; mg/L= milligrams per liter; NS = not specified; NE = not established; -- = not applicableJ = Compound was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. Grab mg/kgAdjacent to Former Gas StationScreening CriteriaBackground Metals in Nearby Brownfield Properties (4)Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/ Commercial PSRGs (1)Maximum Concentration for TCLP (2)Regional Background Metals in Soil (3)SB-8/SB-DUP-27/12/20220-2https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Akridge/AKR.008 1427 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Data TablesTable 1 (Page 2 of 2)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2 Summary of Groundwater Analytical DataFormer Bevs Touch CleanersCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. AKR-008Evaluation AreaUpgradient Portion of SiteDowngradient Portion of Site Former Gas StationSample IDTMW-1 TMW-3 TMW-4Date7/13/2022 7/13/2022 7/13/2022UnitsVOCs (8260D)Di-Isopropyl Ether 2.1<1.5 <1.5 <0.311.370 1,4005,9001,1-Dichloroethane <0.378.38.1<0.37 <0.3767.6331,1-Dichloroethene <0.355.4 5.3<0.35 <0.35350 39160cis-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.38682 671<0.38 <0.3870 50210trans-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.404.7 J 4.4 J<0.40 <0.40100 22 91Methylene Chloride <2.036.1 C933.7 C9<2.0 <2.05 760 4,000Tetrachloroethene <0.29612576<0.29 <0.290.7 12 48Trichloroethene<0.38118113<0.38 <0.3831.04.4SVOCs (8270E)ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL -- -- --Metals (6020B/7470A)Arsenic<0.0870.11 J 0.094 J 0.22 J 0.48 J 10 NE NEBarium 73.3 51.2 51.5 82.4 73.8 700 NE NECadmium<0.060 <0.060 <0.060 <0.0600.062 J 2 NE NEChromium (Total) 0.70 J 2.4 2.4 2.0 8.0 10 NE NELead<0.077 <0.077 <0.0770.30 J 0.58 J 15 NE NEMercury<0.12 <0.12 <0.12 <0.12 <0.121 0.18 0.75Selenium<0.0722.2 2.2 0.15 J 0.076 J 20 NE NESilver<0.070 <0.070 <0.070 <0.070 <0.07020 NE NENotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) 15A NCAC 02L.0202 Groundwater Standards (2L Standards) dated April 2022.2) DEQ Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSLs) dated January 2023.Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L).Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.With the exception of metals, only constituents detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values exceed the 2L Standard.Underlined values exceed the DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion GWSLs. Shaded values exceed the DWM Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion GWSLs. VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; NE = not establishedC9 = Common laboratory contaminant. J = Compound was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. µg/LScreening Criteria 2L Standards (1) Residential GWSLs (2)Non-Residential GWSLs (2)TMW-2/GW-DUPCross-Gradient of Former McCorkles Cleaners7/13/2022https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Akridge/AKR.008 1427 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Data Tables6/27/2023Table 2 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3Summary of Soil Gas Analytical DataFormer Bevs Touch CleanersCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. AKR-008Evaluation AreaSample IDSSV-1 SSV-2 SG-1 SG-2 SG-3Sample Date7/14/2022 7/14/2022 7/13/2022 7/13/2022 7/13/2022Sample Type UnitsVOCs (TO-15)Acetone 55 4,200 210 48 70 47 53 NE NEBenzene 2.4 1.916 19 20 14 2012 160Bromoform<1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.4 <1.41.7 J 2.8 85 1,1002-Butanone (MEK)<6.37.1 J 16 J 7.4 J 9.4 J 8.1 J 8.4 J 35,000 440,000Carbon Disulfide 1.3 J 1.7 J 92 50 120 61 100 4,900 61,000Chloroethane<0.47 <0.47 <0.47 <0.47 <0.47 <0.471.4 28,000 350,000Chloroform 0.96 J 3.3<0.9331 8.24.0 4.0 4.1 53Chloromethane 0.39 J 1.2<0.334.6<0.332.2 4.3 630 7,900Cyclohexane 5.4 1.6 4.7<0.42 <0.42 <0.424.0 42,000 530,000Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.5 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.2 2.5 700 8,800Ethanol 1,500 2,800 87 17 23 13 J 18 NE NEEthyl acetate<3.67.0 J 50<3.6 <3.6 <3.64.1 J 490 6,100Ethylbenzene 8.5 1577287713 J 25 37 4904-Ethyltoluene<0.60 <0.6026 10 17 3.9 3.5 NE NEn-Heptane 1.3<0.5253 20 54 21 40 2,800 35,000Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene<1.8 <1.8 <1.8 <1.8 <1.8 <1.8 <1.84.3 56n-Hexane<3.7 <3.724 J 8.4 J 11 J 36 36 4,900 61,000Isopropyl Alcohol 5.4 J, L-03, V-05 560 L-03, V-05<3.4 <3.4 <3.4 <3.4 <3.41,400 18,000Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 0.71 J<0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56 <0.56360 4,7004-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)<0.44 <0.4419 2.2<0.44 <0.44 <0.4421,000 260,000Naphthalene<0.79 <0.790.94 J 0.82 J 0.80 J 1.0 J<0.792.8 36Propylene<3.0 <3.069 18 8.7 J 42<3.021,000 260,000Styrene<0.45 <0.451.4 1.9 0.68 J 1.5 1.4 J 7,000 88,000Tetrachloroethene 11<1.040 3.3 11 21 37 280 3,500Tetrahydrofuran<0.97 <0.975.1<0.971.6 J<0.97 <0.9714,000 180,000Toluene 1.3 1.8 390 150 410 63 170 35,000 440,0001,1,1-Trichloroethane1.0 J<0.86 <0.86 <0.86 <0.86 <0.86 <0.8635,000 440,000Trichlorofluoromethane 1.7 J 1.4 J 3.6 J 2.9 J 2.1 J 2.2 J 1.7 J NE NE1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane<1.7 <1.711 25 120 13 17 35,000 440,0001,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.69 J 0.59 J 61 27 30 5.6 7.2 420 5,3001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.52 <0.5221 7.5 11 2.1 3.1 420 5,300Vinyl chloride<0.46 <0.46 <0.460.89<0.460.70 0.95 5.6 280o-Xylene 38 51 270 92 230 42 74 700 8,800m&p-Xylene 29 27 88 30 75 16 26 700 8,800Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Vapor Intrusion Sub-Slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated January 2023.Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Laboratory analytical method is shown in parentheses. Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the above table.Bold values exceed the DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSL. VOCs = volatile organic compounds; NE = not establishedJ = Compound was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.L-03 = Laboratory fortified blank/laboratory control sample recovery is outside of control limits resulting in a concentration that is likely biased on the low side for this compound.V-05 = Continuing calibration did not meet method specifications and was biased on the low side of this compound. Increased uncertainty is associated with the reported value which is likely to be biased on the low side for this compound. µg/m3Non-Residential SGSLs (1)Screening CriteriaSG-4/SG-DUPExisting Commercial Building Proposed Retail and Amenity SpaceExterior Soil Gas Sub-Slab Soil GasResidential SGSLs (1)7/13/2022https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Akridge/AKR.008 1427 South Boulevard/Brownfields/EMP/Tables/Data Tables6/27/2023Table 3 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PC

Figures
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. AKR-008
DATE: 5-30-23
FIGURE NO. 2
FORMER BEVS TOUCH CLEANERS
1427 SOUTH BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE MAP
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PARCEL LINE
PAD-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER
DUMPSTER
NOTES:
1. AERIAL IMAGERY AND BASE DATA OBTAINED FROM
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS, 2022.
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
BETTER MED URGENT CARE
(1431 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
SOU
T
H
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
CLEVELAND AVENUEVEGETATED
LAND
RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS
(222 E. BLAND STREET)
(1225 S. CALDWELL STREET)
106
105
104
103
102
101
UNIT TENANT
101 CENTRE SOUTH
102 SAVVY SECONDS
103 FRESH NAILS BAR
104 MODERN MAN
105 LUCKY FISH SEAFOOD &
MEAT MARKET
106 DESTINE TO MAKE IT FITNESS
SECOND FLOOR = VACANT
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Akridge\AKR.008 1427 South Boulevard\Figures\SITE MAP.dwg, FIG 2, 5/31/2023 9:03:10 AM, kmckinney
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. AKR-008
DATE: 5-30-23
FIGURE NO. 3
FORMER BEVS TOUCH CLEANERS
1427 SOUTH BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PARCEL LINE
CHLORINATED SOLVENT WATER
MANAGEMENT AREA
PAD-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER
DUMPSTER
RETAIL/AMENITY SPACE
LOADING DOCK AND SPEED RAMP
SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
SUB-SLAB GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL
LOCATION
SOIL BORING LOCATION
CO-LOCATED SOIL BORING AND
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL
CO-LOCATED SOIL BORING AND
SOIL GAS SAMPLE
NOTES:
1.AERIAL IMAGERY AND BASE DATA OBTAINED FROM
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS, 2022.
2.PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT BASED ON A PRELIMINARY
SITE PLAN DATED 3/24/2022.
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
BETTER MED URGENT CARE
(1431 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
SOU
T
H
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
CLEVELAND AVENUEVEGETATED
LAND
RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS
(222 E. BLAND STREET)
(1225 S. CALDWELL STREET)
SB-6
SG-3
TMW-4/
SB-7
SB-8
TMW-1
SG-2/
SB-3
SG-1/
SB-2
SSV-2
SG-4SSV-1
TMW-3/
SB-5
TMW-2/
SB-4
SB-1
106
105
104
103
102
101
UNIT TENANT
101 CENTRE SOUTH
102 SAVVY SECONDS
103 FRESH NAILS BAR
104 MODERN MAN
105 LUCKY FISH SEAFOOD &
MEAT MARKET
106 DESTINE TO MAKE IT FITNESS
SECOND FLOOR = VACANT
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Akridge\AKR.008 1427 South Boulevard\Brownfields\EMP\Figures\SITE MAP-20230602.dwg, FIG 3, 6/27/2023 6:43:55 AM, shaynes
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. AKR-008
DATE: 6-5-23
FIGURE NO. 4
FORMER BEVS TOUCH CLEANERS
1427 SOUTH BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION MAP
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PARCEL LINE
CHLORINATED SOLVENT WATER
MANAGEMENT AREA
RETAIL/AMENITY SPACE
LOADING DOCK AND SPEED RAMP
SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
SUB-SLAB GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL
LOCATION
SOIL BORING LOCATION
CO-LOCATED SOIL BORING AND
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL
CO-LOCATED SOIL BORING AND
SOIL GAS SAMPLE
NOTES:
1.BASE DATA OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG COUNTY
GIS, 2022.
2.SOIL, GROUNDWATER, AND VAPOR SAMPLES COLLECTED
BY H&H FROM 7/11/22 TO 7/14/22.
3.FOR SOIL, ONLY SAMPLES WITH RESIDENTIAL
EXCEEDENCES ABOVE THE RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY
SOIL REMEDIATION GOALS (PSRGs) DATED JANUARY
2023 ARE SHOWN.
FOR SOIL GAS, ONLY SAMPLES WITH EXCEEDENCES
ABOVE THE NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY (DEQ) DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT (DWM)
VAPOR INTRUSION SUB-SLAB & EXTERIOR SOIL GAS
SCREENING LEVELS (SGSLs) DATED JANUARY 2023 ARE
SHOWN.
FOR GROUNDWATER, ONLY SAMPLES WITH RESIDENTIAL
DEQ DWM VAPOR INTRUSION GROUNDWATER
SCREENING LEVELS AND/OR NC DEQ 15A NCAC 02L.0202
GROUNDWATER STANDARDS (2L STANDARDS) ARE
SHOWN.
4.mg/kg = MILIGRAMS PER KILIGRAM
µg/m3 = MICROGRAMS PER METER CUBED
µg/L = MICROGRAMS PER LITER
5.J = LABORATORY ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION
C9 = COMMON LABORATORY CONTAMINANT
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
BETTER MED URGENT CARE
(1431 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
SOU
T
H
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
CLEVELAND AVENUEVEGETATED
LAND
RESIDENTIAL APARTMENTS
(222 E. BLAND STREET)
(1225 S. CALDWELL STREET)
SB-6
SG-3
TMW-4/
SB-7
SB-8
TMW-1
SG-2/
SB-3
SG-1/
SB-2
SSV-2
SG-4SSV-1
TMW-3/
SB-5
TMW-2/
SB-4
SB-1
SB-1
(SOIL AT 0-2 FT)7/12/22
CHROMIUM (VI)0.964 J mg/kg
CONSTITUENT CONCENTRATION
SAMPLE ID
SAMPLE DATE
SB-1
(SOIL AT 0-2 FT)7/12/22
CHROMIUM (VI)0.964 J mg/kg
SB-3
(SOIL AT 0-2 FT)7/12/22
CHROMIUM (VI)0.396 J mg/kg
SB-6
(SOIL AT 0-2 FT)7/12/22
CHROMIUM (VI)0.439 J mg/kg
SG-1
(SOIL GAS)7/13/22
BENZENE 16 µg/m3
ETHYLBENZENE 77 µg/m3
SG-2
(SOIL GAS)7/13/22
BENZENE 19 µg/m3
CHLOROFORM 31 µg/m3
SB-8/SB-DUP-2
(SOIL AT 0-2 FT)7/12/22
CHROMIUM (VI)0.665 J mg/kg, 0.756 J mg/kg
TMW-2/GW-DUP
(GROUNDWATER)7/13/22
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 8.3 µg/L, 8.1 µg/L
cis-1,2,-DICHLOROETHYLENE 682 µg/L, 671 µg/L
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 36.1 C9 µg/L, 33.7 C9 µg/L
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 612 µg/L, 576 µg/L
TRICHLOROETHYLENE 118 µg/L, 113 µg/L
SB-7
(SOIL AT 0-2 FT)7/11/22
CHROMIUM (VI)0.385 J mg/kg
SG-3
(SOIL GAS)7/13/22
BENZENE 20 µg/m3
CHLOROFORM 8.2 µg/m3
ETHYLBENZENE 77 µg/m3
SB-4/SB-DUP-1
(SOIL AT 0-2 FT)7/11/22
CHROMIUM (VI)2.99 mg/kg, 1.80 mg/kg
SG-4/SG-DUP
(SOIL GAS)7/13/22
BENZENE 14 µg/m3, 20 µg/m3
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Akridge\AKR.008 1427 South Boulevard\Brownfields\EMP\Figures\SITE MAP-20230602.dwg, FIG 4 (2), 6/27/2023 6:44:19 AM, shaynes

Appendix A

Preliminary Redevelopment Plan

UP
BUILDING ELEMENTS
N 278.485
E 141.501
10.000
ELEVATION (MAY BE RELATIVE TO
PROJECT BENCHMARK OR OTHER
DATUM- REFER TO GENERAL NOTES
COORDINATES AT POINT (MAY BE
RELATIVE TO PROJECT BENCHMARK OR
OTHER DATUM- REFER TO GENERAL
NOTES)
PROPERTY LINE (REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS
AND SURVEY FOR PROPERTY INFORMATION)
SITE PLAN LEGEND
A B C E F G
1
2
5
8
3
RETAIL
TRASH/RECYCLING
68
RESIDENTIAL
STORAGE
67
BACKFLOW
64
FCC
76
AUX.
PACKAGE
75
4
6
7
F.5 F.7E.7A.5 E.2
5.8
6.5
3.1
E.5
SERVICE
RIGHT OUT
ONLY
LOADING
(10' x 30')
ONE WAY/
SERVICE ONLY TRUCKSOUTH BLVD
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK
D
RETAIL
100
PET
WASH
80
BIKE
STORAGE
06
STAIR 3
66
STAIR 1
65
MAINTENANCE
OFFICE
04
DW/FP
03
ELECTRICAL
02
GENERATOR
01
STAIR 2
77
ELEV.
VESTIBULE
99
TRASH
RECYCLING
133
0.9
RESIDENTIAL
RECYCLING
STAGING
AND
BULK
STORAGE
69
B.7 B.9A.2 A.3 A.7 C.7 C.9 D.5 D.9 E.3 E.4 F.4 F.6 F.8 G.1
1.3
1.9
2.3
3.5
5.1
6.9
6.1
AA
1.2
1.4
3.2
F.9
5.9
6.4
6.6
6.2 RETAIL GREASE TRAP5'-1 5/8"A B C
E
F G
1
2
5
8
3
4
6
7
F.5 F.7E.7A.5 E.2
5.9
6.5
3.1
E.5D
1. EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS AT MASONRY VENEER ARE COURSING, NOT ACTUAL,
AND ARE TO FACE OF MASONRY.
2. EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS AT EIFS VENEER ARE TO FACE OF FINISH EIFS.
3. EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS AT PRECAST ARE TO FACE OF PRECAST.
4. INTERIOR DIMENSIONS INDICATED ARE TO FACE OF GWB, FACE OF MASONRY
AND CENTERLINES OF COLUMNS, UNO.
5. LOCATE DOOR OPENINGS 4" FROM NEAREST PERPENDICULAR WALL.
6. RATED WALLS/PARTITIONS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TIGHT TO STRUCTURE. ALL
PENETRATIONS AND TERMINAL JOINTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN IN
APPLICABLE UL JOINT OR PENETRATION DETAIL.
7. WHERE PARTITIONS OF DIFFERENT FIRE RATINGS INTERSECT, THE HIGHEST
RATED PARTITION SHALL CONTINUE THROUGH. MAINTAIN PARTITION FIRE
RATING BEHIND RECESSED FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS.
8. RATED WALLS INTERSECTING EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL EXTEND TO THE INSIDE
FACE OF EXTERIOR SHEATHING.
9. INSTALL BLOCKING IN PARTITIONS FOR CASEWORK, WALL MOUNTED
EQUIPMENT, TRIM, AND RELATED CONSTRUCTION.
10. SEE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR LOCATIONS OF FIRE RATED AND SMOKE WALLS
11. SEE SHEET FOR CONSTRUCTION SUBSYSTEMS (OR PARTITION
SCHEDULE)
12. SEE SHEET FOR INTERIOR ELEVATIONS, ACCESSORY DESCRIPTIONS &
MOUNTING HEIGHTS.
13. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SLAB DEPRESSIONS AND CUTOUTS.
14. SEE BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS FOR LOCATION OF EXTERIOR MASONRY
CONTROL JOINTS.
15. FIELD VERIFY LOCATION OF INTERIOR WALL & CEILING CONTROL JOINTS
REQUIRED IN THE SPECIFICATION WITH ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
16. WALLS, INCLUDING GYP. BD. AT PERIMETER OF ROOMS/SPACES WITHOUT
CEILINGS, I.E. EXPOSED STRUCTURE, SHALL EXTEND TO STRUCTURE ABOVE.
17. PROVIDE (5) FLOOR DRAINS PER PARKING LEVEL. SEE PLUMBING.
18. AT FIRE SERVICE ACCESS ELEVATORS PROVIDE JR SMITH STAINLESS STEEL
THRESHOLD DRAIN.
19. SEE _____ FOR EXTERIOR WALL RATING REQUIREMENTS.
20. SEE BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR WINDOW TYPES.
A-001
FLOOR PLAN SHEET NOTES
G-100THE LINE SHOWN ABOVE IS EXACTLY ONE INCH LONG AT THIS SHEETS ORIGINAL PAGE SIZELS3P PROJECT:ORIG
SUBMISSION:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NAME:
SHEET:
A
B
C
D
E
1 2 3 4 5 6
DATE DESCRIPTION∆
COPYRIGHT 2021 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED OR
ELECTRONIC DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTATION MAY
NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT WRITTEN
PERMISSION FROM LS3P ASSOCIATES LTD.
12/16/2022
12/16/2022 10:39:27 AMA-050
ARCHITECTURAL
SITE PLAN 9512-2229701427 SOUTH BLVD.CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 282031427 SOUTH BLVD100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
NORTH
TRUE
NORTH
WWW.LS3P.COM
227 WEST TRADE STREET, SUITE 700
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28202
TEL. [phone] FAX. [phone]
3/32" = 1'-0"A1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN

Appendix B

Preliminary Grading Plan and Cut/Fill Analysis
Not EnclosedPACKAGE73A0"RESIDENTIALSTORAGE67RETAILTRASH/RECYCLING68BACKFLOW64STAIR 366STAIR 1654557.53 SFRETAIL100246.29 SFAUX.PACKAGE75311.68 SFFCC76STAIR 277TRASHRECYCLING13399ELEV.VESTIBULE73APACKAGE69RESIDENTIALRECYCLINGSTAGINGAND BULKSTORAGE04MAINTENANCEOFFICE03DW/FP02ELECTRICAL06BIKESTORAGEGENERATOR01PETWASH80VESTIBULE8110%[No Slope]6.25%6.25%6"0"-1'-3"0"0"-1'-3"0"0"11.79%6"-6"-5"0"0"4.35%10%0"0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"5.05%-1'-3"0"-1'-3"0"0"0"0"0"0"3206ELEVATORLOBBY1119.58 SFLOBBY3207998.92 SFMAIL3208PCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCE PCCE
PCCE WUGPUGP
UGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGPUGP UGP UGP
UGPUGPUGP
UGP UGP UGP
UGPUGPUGP
GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS
WWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS SS SS SS
W TC 731.65G 731.15TC 731.28G 730.78730.90 FGTC 730.60G 730.10TC 730.27G 729.77TC 729.02G 728.52TC 729.62G 729.12TC 730.90G 730.40TC 731.13G 730.631.50%1.00%1.50%
1.50%728.77 FGFG 732.00FG 732.00FG 731.68FG 731.50FG 731.50FG 730.25FG 730.25FG 729.43FG 731.50FG 731.00EX. 725.19EX. 730.65EX. 728.89EX. 732.00EX. 729.16EX. 727.35EX. 728.11FG 730.25FG 731.50FG 731.50FG 731.50FG 731.50FG 731.50FG 731.50FG 731.59FG 731.77FG 731.98FG 731.63FG 731.38FG 731.38FG 731.37FG 731.28FG 731.28FG 730.80FG 730.40FG 730.09FG 730.08FG 731.49FG 731.31FG 731.21FG 731.07FG 730.91FG 730.58FG 730.24FG 729.90FG 729.80FG 731.40FG 730.97FG 730.53FG 730.25FG 731.88FG 731.73FG 729.96FG 729.78EX. 729.08FG 729.94FG 729.82EX. 729.04FG 729.92FG 729.82EX. 729.01FG 730.03FG 729.94EX. 729.02FG 730.13FG 730.04EX. 728.43FG 730.23FG 730.20FG 730.25FG 730.25EX. 726.99FG 730.25FG 731.85FG 731.90FG 731.94FG 731.50FG 731.50FG 731.50FG 731.50FG 731.50FG 731.00FG 731.50TW 731.44BW 729.82FG 731.50FG 730.51FG 730.56FG 730.60FG 730.66FG 730.69FG 730.76FG 730.54FG 730.61FG 730.29FG 730.36FG 730.01FG 730.09FG 729.39FG 729.56EX. 730.71FG 730.75FG 729.86EX. 729.21EX. 729.95EX. 730.25EX. 730.52EX. 730.64EX. 730.39EX. 730.14EX. 729.59EX. 730.33EX. 730.91EX. 731.39EX. 731.62EX. 732.11EX. 732.35EX. 732.46FG 730.83FG 730.10FG 730.01FG 730.74FG 731.15FG 731.07FG 731.41FG 731.34FG 731.74FG 731.83FG 732.28FG 730.14FG 730.25FG 730.25FG 730.25FG 731.41FG 731.49FG 731.41FG 731.50FG 731.41FG 731.50FG 732.10FG 732.01FG 731.84FG 731.72FG 731.71FG 731.83FG 729.98FG 730.10FG 730.11FG 729.99FG 729.98FG 730.10FG 731.502.18%
4.65%1.72%1.04%1.53%1.00%1.10%3.11%2.97%2.68%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%1.50%TS 730.96FG 730.46TS 731.46FG 730.963.48%TS 731.46FG 730.96TS 730.96FG 730.46TW 731.44BW 729.52TW 729.79BW 728.33TW 729.30BW 726.32TW 730.11BW 727.39TW 730.20BW 727.63TW 730.09BW 728.78FG 730.23731
730
726 3:1 MAX3:1 MAXTW 731.44BW 729.20FG 730.27FG 730.18FG 730.103.36%7307317321.07%FG 731.37FG 731.14PID: 123-021-02HORIZON DEVELOPMENTPROPERTIES, INC.DB 33075 PG 824EX. LAND USE: HOME FOR THEAGED EX. ZONING: TOD-MOPID: 123-021-03HORIZON DEVELOPMENTPROPERTIES, INC.DB 33075 PG 824EX. LAND USE: HOME FOR THE AGEDEX. ZONING: TOD-MOPID: 123-028-18MERIDIAN COMMERCIAL LLCDB 32218 PG 502-506EX. LAND USE: COMMERCIALEX. ZONING: TOD-UC1427 SOUTH BLVDAKRIDGE + KETTLER1427 SOUTH BOULEVARDCHARLOTTE, NC 282031022096GRADING PLANN/ALDILDILDIC4-0012/15/2022 9:38 AM KEVIN HOPKINS \\CORP.LANDDESIGN.COM\LDCORPDATA\PROJECTS\CLT\_2022\1022096\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\1022096_PLN_GRAD.DWGKEY MAPSEALSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLELANDDESIGN PROJ.#SCALEPROJECTNORTHREVISION / ISSUANCEORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 30" X 42"VERT:HORZ:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:223 NORTH GRAHAM STREETCHARLOTTE, NC 28202704.333.0325WWW.LANDDESIGN.COMNC ENG. FIRM LICENSE # C-0658NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSITESEALSEALNO. DESCRIPTION DATE109.14.2022SD SUBMITTAL210.28.202250% DD SUBMITTAL312.16.2022100% DD SUBMITTALSOUTH BLVD(100' PUBLIC R/W)4+ AVENUE/ BOULEVARD0 1"=5' 10'20'10'FFE: 730.25FFE: 730.25FFE: 732.00FFE: 731.50FFE: 731.50FFE: 731.50FFE: 731.50FFE: 730.25FFE: 730.25FFE: 730.25FFE: 731.50FFE: 731.50FFE: 731.50FFE: 731.00FFE: 731.50FFE: 731.50PROP. 174 LF OFRETAINING WALLFFE: 730.25
2.25 2.10 1.95 1.80 1.65 1.50 1.35 1.20 1.05 0.90 0.75 0.60 0.45 0.30 0.15 ± .075 0.15 0.30 0.45 0.60 0.75 0.90 1.05 1.20 1.35 1.50 1.65 1.80 1.95 2.10 2.25Job: 1022096-X-AGTEK 2Units: Ft-CYFri Oct 28, 2022 09:20:11 Page 1 Volume Report Subgrade vs Stripped Area Volume Comp/Ratio Compact Export Change Total Cut Fill OnGrade Cut Fill Cut Fill Cut Fill -Import Per 0.1 ftREPORT REGION 45,954 4,582 36,796 4,576 59 885 1.00 1.00 59 885 -826 170 Plane SlopeStripping Qtys Area Area Depth Volume STRIPPING 45,954 46,010 0.500 852 Plane SlopeSectional Qtys Area Area Depth Volume BUILDING 7,155 7,168 1.000 265BUILDING 19,511 19,511 1.000 723BUILDING 6,919 6,919 1.000 256 BUILDING Sub: 33,585 33,598 1.000 1,244 ROADWAY 1,013 1,047 1.000 39ROADWAY 735 741 1.000 27 ROADWAY Sub: 1,748 1,788 1.000 66 SIDEWALK 1,077 1,102 0.333 14SIDEWALK 2,404 2,419 0.333 30SIDEWALK 1,875 1,875 0.333 23 SIDEWALK Sub: 5,356 5,396 0.333 67 Sectional Total 40,689 40,782 1,377

Appendix C

Preliminary Construction Schedule
Activity Name Original
Duration
Start Finish
1427 SOUTH BLVD - MAY 2023 - 100 DD Schedule821 07-Jun-22 A 28-Jul-26
MILESTONES 652 02-Jan-24 28-Jul-26
NTP/Construction Start 0 02-Jan-24*
Issue Full Building Permit 0 22-Jan-24
Above Grade Structure Start 0 27-Feb-24
Windows Start 0 05-Feb-25
Above Grade Structure Complete 0 29-Apr-25
Tower Crane Removed 0 20-May-25
Full Building Enclosed 0 07-Aug-25
Temporary Hoist Removed 0 19-Sep-25
L1 Retail Turnover 0 15-Jan-26
Weather Allowance (15 Days)15 13-Apr-26 01-May-26
Substantial Completion 0 01-May-26
Final Completion 0 28-Jul-26
SUMMARY SCHEDULE 592 02-Jan-24 01-May-26
FOUNDATIONS 39 02-Jan-24 26-Feb-24
CONCRETE - TOWER 298 27-Feb-24 29-Apr-25
BUILDING ENVELOPE 343 26-Jun-24 31-Oct-25
EXTERIOR SHEATHING WALLS 257 26-Jun-24 01-Jul-25
RESIDENTIAL BUILDOUT 413 13-Sep-24 01-May-26
EIFS 254 31-Oct-24 31-Oct-25
LOBBY & AMENITY BUILDOUT 358 08-Nov-24 10-Apr-26
WINDOWS 164 16-Dec-24 07-Aug-25
CONCRETE - PODIUM LEAVE-OUT 100 21-May-25 10-Oct-25
HOIST INFILL & ASSOCIATED BUILDOUT 109 22-Sep-25 26-Feb-26
L10 EXTERIOR AMENITY & POOL BUILDOUT 125 13-Oct-25 10-Apr-26
DESIGN 125 07-Jun-22 A 25-Oct-23
DRAWING DEV 125 07-Jun-22 A 25-Oct-23
Concept Design 0 07-Jun-22 A
Schematic Design 45 08-Jun-22 A 01-Aug-22 A
Issue SD's 0 01-Aug-22 A
50% Design Development 40 02-Aug-22 A 03-Oct-22 A
Issue 50% DD Package 0 03-Oct-22 A
100% Design Development 40 04-Oct-22 A 16-Dec-22 A
Issue 100% DD 0 16-Dec-22 A
75% Construction Documents 40 19-Dec-22 A 19-May-23
Foundation Permit Set 64 01-May-23 31-Jul-23
90% Construction Documents (GMP Set)70 22-May-23 29-Aug-23
Issued For Construction (IFCs)40 30-Aug-23 25-Oct-23
Full Building Permit Set 23 30-Aug-23 02-Oct-23
Issue IFCs 0 25-Oct-23
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 183 01-Jul-22 A 22-Jan-24
MISC.183 01-Nov-22 A 22-Jan-24
Geotech Report Development 20 01-Nov-22 A 07-Dec-22 A
Determine Water Sampling Contamination 0 07-Dec-22 A
Final Geotech Report Issued 0 07-Dec-22 A
Submit Land Development 0 01-May-23*
Submit CDOT Lease Agreement Plan 45 01-May-23*03-Jul-23
Preliminary Load Letters to Duke (Clark)0 12-May-23 A
Duke Vault Size Validation 0 26-May-23
Charlotte Fire Review 0 22-Jan-24*
PERMITS 183 01-May-23 22-Jan-24
Notification of Permit Application 0 01-May-23*
Permit Delineation/Strategy 0 01-May-23*
Permitting Preliminary Review 0 01-May-23*
Submit for Foundation Permit 0 31-Jul-23
Submit Utility Relocate CDOT Permit 20 01-Aug-23*28-Aug-23
Superstructure Permit Review 80 01-Aug-23 21-Nov-23
Contaminated Water Permit Approval 90 01-Aug-23 07-Dec-23
Grading/Erosion Control Permit Review 60 01-Aug-23*24-Oct-23
Issue Utility Relocate Permit 0 29-Aug-23*
CDOT Encroachment Utility Permit (AHJ)0 29-Aug-23*
Submit for Full Building Permit 0 02-Oct-23
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
2023 2024 2025 2026
NTP/Construction Start
Issue Full Building Permit
Above Grade Structure Start
Windows Start
Above Grade Structure Complete
Tower Crane Removed
Full Building Enclosed
Temporary Hoist Removed
L1 Retail Turnover
Weather Allowance (15 Days)
Substantial Completion
Final Completion
FOUNDATIONS
CONCRETE - TOWER
BUILDING ENVELOPE
EXTERIOR SHEATHING WALLS
RESIDENTIAL BUILDOUT
EIFS
LOBBY & AMENITY BUILDOUT
WINDOWS
CONCRETE - PODIUM LEAVE-OUT
HOIST INFILL & ASSOCIATED BUILDOUT
L10 EXTERIOR AMENITY & POOL BUILDOUT
75% Construction Documents
Foundation Permit Set
90% Construction Documents (GMP Set)
Issued For Construction (IFCs)
Full Building Permit Set
Issue IFCs
Determine Water Sampling Contamination
Submit Land Development
Submit CDOT Lease Agreement Plan
Preliminary Load Letters to Duke (Clark)
Duke Vault Size Validation
Charlotte Fire Review
Notification of Permit Application
Permit Delineation/Strategy
Permitting Preliminary Review
Submit for Foundation Permit
Submit Utility Relocate CDOT Permit
Superstructure Permit Review
Contaminated Water Permit Approval
Grading/Erosion Control Permit Review
Issue Utility Relocate Permit
CDOT Encroachment Utility Permit (AHJ)
Submit for Full Building Permit
1427 SOUTH BLVD - MAY 2023 - 100 DD Schedule CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC Page 1 of 6
1427 S Boulevard - Charlotte, North Carolina
Akridge/Kettler 100% DD Schedule May 15th, 2023
Activity Name Original
Duration
Start Finish
Full Bldg Permit Review 75 03-Oct-23 19-Jan-24
Issue Mass Grading/Erosion Control Permit 0 25-Oct-23*
Issue Demolition Permit 0 01-Nov-23*
Issue Foundation Permit 0 08-Dec-23*
Issue Full Bldg Permit 0 22-Jan-24*
BUDGET & PRICING 131 01-Jul-22 A 02-Nov-23
Concept Budget Package 20 01-Jul-22 A 01-Aug-22 A
MEP Procurement 40 01-May-23*26-Jun-23
100% DD Budget Update 15 01-May-23 19-May-23
Glazing Procurement 20 30-Aug-23*27-Sep-23
Review and Approve GMP Estimate 45 30-Aug-23 01-Nov-23
CD's Budget Update 5 27-Oct-23 02-Nov-23
Execute GMP Owner Agreement 0 02-Nov-23*
PROCUREMENT 65 27-Jun-23 28-Sep-23
BIDDING & AWARD 65 27-Jun-23 28-Sep-23
Award MEP Subcontractors 0 27-Jun-23*
Select Site Utility Contractor 0 29-Aug-23*
Award Demo/Excavation Subcontractor 0 29-Aug-23*
Award Concrete Subcontractor 0 21-Sep-23*
Award Elevator Subcontractor 0 21-Sep-23
Award Glazing Subcontractor 0 28-Sep-23*
CONSTRUCTION 642 27-Sep-23 10-Apr-26
SITE PREP/MOBILIZATION 65 27-Sep-23 29-Dec-23
Site Enabling Start 0 01-Nov-23
DEMOLITION 40 01-Nov-23 29-Dec-23
Existing Utility Relocation 20 01-Nov-23 30-Nov-23
Existing Site Demo/Clearing 20 01-Dec-23 29-Dec-23
SITEWORK 55 27-Sep-23 14-Dec-23
Pre Cores for Foundations (Pre Bldg Demo)25 27-Sep-23 31-Oct-23
Pre Cores for Foundations (Post Bldg Demo)5 08-Dec-23 14-Dec-23
FOUNDATIONS 49 02-Jan-24 11-Mar-24
Caissons 25 02-Jan-24 05-Feb-24
Caps/Grade Beams 15 06-Feb-24 26-Feb-24
Tower Crane Pad 5 06-Feb-24 12-Feb-24
Mat Slab Concrete 10 13-Feb-24 26-Feb-24
MEP Underground 15 20-Feb-24 11-Mar-24
Vapor Mitigation Install 10 27-Feb-24 11-Mar-24
SUPERSTRUCTURE 413 27-Feb-24 10-Oct-25
GARAGE PODIUM 414 27-Feb-24 10-Oct-25
L1-L2 Walls & Columns 10 27-Feb-24 11-Mar-24
L2 Concrete Deck - 21,000 sf 15 05-Mar-24 25-Mar-24
CIP Concrete SOG 10 12-Mar-24 25-Mar-24
L2-L3 Walls & Columns 10 19-Mar-24 01-Apr-24
L3 Concrete Deck 15 26-Mar-24 15-Apr-24
L3-L4 Walls & Columns 10 02-Apr-24 15-Apr-24
L4 Concrete Deck 15 09-Apr-24 29-Apr-24
L4-L5 Walls & Columns 10 16-Apr-24 29-Apr-24
L5 Concrete Deck 15 23-Apr-24 13-May-24
L5-L6 Walls & Columns 10 30-Apr-24 13-May-24
L6 Concrete Deck 15 07-May-24 28-May-24
L6-L7 Walls & Columns 10 14-May-24 28-May-24
L7 Concrete Deck 15 21-May-24 11-Jun-24
L7-L8 Walls & Columns 10 29-May-24 11-Jun-24
L8 Concrete Deck 15 05-Jun-24 25-Jun-24
L8-L9 Walls & Columns 10 12-Jun-24 25-Jun-24
L9 Concrete Deck 15 19-Jun-24 10-Jul-24
L9-L10 Walls & Columns 10 26-Jun-24 10-Jul-24
L10 Concrete Deck 15 03-Jul-24 24-Jul-24
L10-L11 Walls & Columns 10 11-Jul-24 24-Jul-24
L11 Concrete Deck 15 18-Jul-24 07-Aug-24
L1-L2 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)5 21-May-25 28-May-25
L2 Concrete Deck - 12,000 sf (Podium Leave Out)10 29-May-25 11-Jun-25
L2-L3 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)5 12-Jun-25 18-Jun-25
L3 Concrete Deck (Podium Leave Out)10 19-Jun-25 02-Jul-25
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
2023 2024 2025 2026
Full Bldg Permit Review
Issue Mass Grading/Erosion Control Permit
Issue Demolition Permit
Issue Foundation Permit
Issue Full Bldg Permit
MEP Procurement
100% DD Budget Update
Glazing Procurement
Review and Approve GMP Estimate
CD's Budget Update
Execute GMP Owner Agreement
Award MEP Subcontractors
Select Site Utility Contractor
Award Demo/Excavation Subcontractor
Award Concrete Subcontractor
Award Elevator Subcontractor
Award Glazing Subcontractor
Site Enabling Start
Existing Utility Relocation
Existing Site Demo/Clearing
Pre Cores for Foundations (Pre Bldg Demo)
Pre Cores for Foundations (Post Bldg Demo)
Caissons
Caps/Grade Beams
Tower Crane Pad
Mat Slab Concrete
MEP Underground
Vapor Mitigation Install
L1-L2 Walls & Columns
L2 Concrete Deck - 21,000 sf
CIP Concrete SOG
L2-L3 Walls & Columns
L3 Concrete Deck
L3-L4 Walls & Columns
L4 Concrete Deck
L4-L5 Walls & Columns
L5 Concrete Deck
L5-L6 Walls & Columns
L6 Concrete Deck
L6-L7 Walls & Columns
L7 Concrete Deck
L7-L8 Walls & Columns
L8 Concrete Deck
L8-L9 Walls & Columns
L9 Concrete Deck
L9-L10 Walls & Columns
L10 Concrete Deck
L10-L11 Walls & Columns
L11 Concrete Deck
L1-L2 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)
L2 Concrete Deck - 12,000 sf (Podium Leave Out)
L2-L3 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)
L3 Concrete Deck (Podium Leave Out)
1427 SOUTH BLVD - MAY 2023 - 100 DD Schedule CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC Page 2 of 6
1427 S Boulevard - Charlotte, North Carolina
Akridge/Kettler 100% DD Schedule May 15th, 2023
Activity Name Original
Duration
Start Finish
L3-L4 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)5 26-Jun-25 02-Jul-25
L4 Concrete Deck (Podium Leave Out)10 03-Jul-25 17-Jul-25
L4-L5 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)5 11-Jul-25 17-Jul-25
L5 Concrete Deck (Podium Leave Out)10 18-Jul-25 31-Jul-25
L5-L6 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)5 25-Jul-25 31-Jul-25
L6 Concrete Deck (Podium Leave Out)10 01-Aug-25 14-Aug-25
L6-L7 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)5 08-Aug-25 14-Aug-25
L7 Concrete Deck (Podium Leave Out)10 15-Aug-25 28-Aug-25
L7-L8 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)5 22-Aug-25 28-Aug-25
L8 Concrete Deck (Podium Leave Out)10 29-Aug-25 12-Sep-25
L8-L9 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)5 08-Sep-25 12-Sep-25
L9 Concrete Deck (Podium Leave Out)10 15-Sep-25 26-Sep-25
L9-L10 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)5 22-Sep-25 26-Sep-25
L10 Concrete Deck (Podium Leave Out)10 29-Sep-25 10-Oct-25
RESI TOWER 198 08-Aug-24 20-May-25
CIP Concrete L12 10 08-Aug-24 21-Aug-24
CIP Concrete L13 10 22-Aug-24 05-Sep-24
CIP Concrete L14 8 06-Sep-24 17-Sep-24
CIP Concrete L15 8 18-Sep-24 27-Sep-24
CIP Concrete L16 8 30-Sep-24 09-Oct-24
CIP Concrete L17 8 10-Oct-24 21-Oct-24
CIP Concrete L18 8 22-Oct-24 31-Oct-24
CIP Concrete L19 8 01-Nov-24 12-Nov-24
CIP Concrete L20 8 13-Nov-24 22-Nov-24
CIP Concrete L21 8 25-Nov-24 06-Dec-24
CIP Concrete L22 8 09-Dec-24 18-Dec-24
CIP Concrete L23 8 19-Dec-24 31-Dec-24
CIP Concrete L24 8 02-Jan-25 13-Jan-25
CIP Concrete L25 8 14-Jan-25 23-Jan-25
CIP Concrete L26 8 24-Jan-25 04-Feb-25
CIP Concrete L27 8 05-Feb-25 14-Feb-25
CIP Concrete L28 8 17-Feb-25 26-Feb-25
CIP Concrete L29 8 27-Feb-25 10-Mar-25
CIP Concrete L30 8 11-Mar-25 20-Mar-25
CIP Concrete L31 8 21-Mar-25 01-Apr-25
CIP Concrete L32 (Roof)10 02-Apr-25 15-Apr-25
CIP Concrete Penthouse & PH Roof 10 16-Apr-25 29-Apr-25
Roof Picks for Misc. Trades 5 30-Apr-25 06-May-25
Tower Crane Dismantle 10 07-May-25 20-May-25
ENCLOSURE 343 26-Jun-24 31-Oct-25
EXTERIOR FRAMING/SHEATHING 329 26-Jun-24 10-Oct-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L2 10 26-Jun-24 10-Jul-24
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L3 10 11-Jul-24 24-Jul-24
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L4 10 25-Jul-24 07-Aug-24
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L5 10 08-Aug-24 21-Aug-24
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L6 10 22-Aug-24 05-Sep-24
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L7 10 06-Sep-24 19-Sep-24
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L8 10 18-Sep-24 01-Oct-24
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L9 10 30-Sep-24 11-Oct-24
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L10 10 10-Oct-24 23-Oct-24
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L11 10 22-Oct-24 04-Nov-24
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L12 15 01-Nov-24 21-Nov-24
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L13 15 13-Nov-24 05-Dec-24
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L14 15 25-Nov-24 17-Dec-24
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L15 15 09-Dec-24 30-Dec-24
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L16 15 19-Dec-24 10-Jan-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L17 15 02-Jan-25 22-Jan-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L18 15 14-Jan-25 03-Feb-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L19 15 24-Jan-25 13-Feb-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L20 15 05-Feb-25 25-Feb-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L21 15 17-Feb-25 07-Mar-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L22 15 27-Feb-25 19-Mar-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L23 15 11-Mar-25 31-Mar-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L24 15 21-Mar-25 10-Apr-25
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
2023 2024 2025 2026
L3-L4 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)
L4 Concrete Deck (Podium Leave Out)
L4-L5 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)
L5 Concrete Deck (Podium Leave Out)
L5-L6 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)
L6 Concrete Deck (Podium Leave Out)
L6-L7 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)
L7 Concrete Deck (Podium Leave Out)
L7-L8 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)
L8 Concrete Deck (Podium Leave Out)
L8-L9 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)
L9 Concrete Deck (Podium Leave Out)
L9-L10 Walls & Columns (Podium Leave Out)
L10 Concrete Deck (Podium Leave Out)
CIP Concrete L12
CIP Concrete L13
CIP Concrete L14
CIP Concrete L15
CIP Concrete L16
CIP Concrete L17
CIP Concrete L18
CIP Concrete L19
CIP Concrete L20
CIP Concrete L21
CIP Concrete L22
CIP Concrete L23
CIP Concrete L24
CIP Concrete L25
CIP Concrete L26
CIP Concrete L27
CIP Concrete L28
CIP Concrete L29
CIP Concrete L30
CIP Concrete L31
CIP Concrete L32 (Roof)
CIP Concrete Penthouse & PH Roof
Roof Picks for Misc. Trades
Tower Crane Dismantle
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L2
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L3
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L4
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L5
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L6
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L7
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L8
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L9
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L10
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L11
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L12
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L13
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L14
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L15
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L16
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L17
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L18
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L19
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L20
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L21
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L22
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L23
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L24
1427 SOUTH BLVD - MAY 2023 - 100 DD Schedule CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC Page 3 of 6
1427 S Boulevard - Charlotte, North Carolina
Akridge/Kettler 100% DD Schedule May 15th, 2023
Activity Name Original
Duration
Start Finish
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L25 15 02-Apr-25 22-Apr-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L26 15 11-Apr-25 01-May-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L27 15 22-Apr-25 12-May-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L28 15 01-May-25 21-May-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L29 15 12-May-25 02-Jun-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L30 15 21-May-25 11-Jun-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L31 15 02-Jun-25 20-Jun-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L32 15 11-Jun-25 01-Jul-25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - Hoist Leaveout 15 22-Sep-25 10-Oct-25
EXTERIOR WORK: EIFS, BRICK, METAL PANEL, WINDOWS 259 24-Oct-24 31-Oct-25
NORTH ELEVATION 219 24-Oct-24 05-Sep-25
BRICKWORK, METAL PANELS, WINDOWS 70 24-Oct-24 04-Feb-25
Set Hydro-Mobiles - North to L10 5 24-Oct-24 30-Oct-24
EIFS & Brick Veneer - North L1-10 30 31-Oct-24 13-Dec-24
Windows & Metal Panels North L1-L10 35 16-Dec-24 04-Feb-25
EIFS & WINDOWS 100 16-Apr-25 05-Sep-25
Set Swing Stages - North Roof 5 16-Apr-25 22-Apr-25
Punch Windows & Waterproofing North L11-L31 35 23-Apr-25 11-Jun-25
EIFS - North L11-Roof 60 12-Jun-25 05-Sep-25
SOUTH ELEVATION (EIFS)140 16-Apr-25 31-Oct-25
Set Swing Stages - South Roof 5 16-Apr-25 22-Apr-25
Punch Windows & Waterproofing South L10-Roof 35 23-Apr-25 11-Jun-25
EIFS - South L10-Roof 60 12-Jun-25 05-Sep-25
EIFS - Hoist Leaveout 15 13-Oct-25 31-Oct-25
EAST ELEVATION 222 18-Dec-24 31-Oct-25
BRICKWORK, ETC.70 18-Dec-24 28-Mar-25
Set Swing Stages/Hydros - East L15 5 18-Dec-24 24-Dec-24
EIFS - East L2-15 30 26-Dec-24 06-Feb-25
Punch Windows East L2-L15 35 07-Feb-25 28-Mar-25
EIFS & WINDOWS 100 12-Jun-25 31-Oct-25
Set Swing Stages - East Roof 5 12-Jun-25 18-Jun-25
Punch Windows & Waterproofing East L16-L31 35 19-Jun-25 07-Aug-25
EIFS - East L16-Roof 60 08-Aug-25 31-Oct-25
WEST ELEVATION 212 18-Dec-24 17-Oct-25
BRICKWORK, METAL PANELS, ETC 60 18-Dec-24 14-Mar-25
Set Swing Stages/Hydros - West L15 5 18-Dec-24 24-Dec-24
EIFS - West L2-15 30 26-Dec-24 06-Feb-25
Punch Windows West L2-L15 25 07-Feb-25 14-Mar-25
EIFS & WINDOWS 90 12-Jun-25 17-Oct-25
Set Swing Stages - West Roof 5 12-Jun-25 18-Jun-25
Punch Windows & Waterproofing West L16-L31 25 19-Jun-25 24-Jul-25
EIFS - West L16-Roof 60 25-Jul-25 17-Oct-25
ROOFING 227 25-Nov-24 17-Oct-25
Temp Roof - L15 5 25-Nov-24 03-Dec-24
Temp Roof - Elevator Machine Room & L32 Openings 10 30-Apr-25 13-May-25
Install Permanent L32 Roof 25 15-Sep-25 17-Oct-25
VERTICAL TRANSPORTATION 353 29-May-24 17-Oct-25
TEMPORARY HOIST 333 29-May-24 19-Sep-25
Install Hoist 10 29-May-24 11-Jun-24
Hoist Service 313 12-Jun-24 05-Sep-25
Remove Hoist 10 08-Sep-25 19-Sep-25
PERMANENT ELEVATORS 120 30-Apr-25 17-Oct-25
Elevator Machine Room Buildout 10 30-Apr-25 13-May-25
Expedited Service Elevator 80 14-May-25 05-Sep-25
Passenger Elevator Buildout 110 14-May-25 17-Oct-25
BUILDOUT 473 29-May-24 10-Apr-26
PARKING BUILDOUT 135 29-Aug-25 12-Mar-26
Parking Buildout - L2 15 29-Aug-25 19-Sep-25
Parking Buildout - L3 15 22-Sep-25 10-Oct-25
Parking Buildout - L4 15 13-Oct-25 31-Oct-25
Parking Buildout - L5 15 03-Nov-25 21-Nov-25
Parking Buildout - L6 15 24-Nov-25 16-Dec-25
Parking Buildout - L7 15 17-Dec-25 08-Jan-26
Parking Buildout - L8 15 09-Jan-26 29-Jan-26
Parking Buildout - L9 15 30-Jan-26 19-Feb-26
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
2023 2024 2025 2026
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L25
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L26
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L27
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L28
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L29
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L30
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L31
Ext Framing/Sheathing - L32
Ext Framing/Sheathing - Hoist Leaveout
Set Hydro-Mobiles - North to L10
EIFS & Brick Veneer - North L1-10
Windows & Metal Panels North L1-L10
Set Swing Stages - North Roof
Punch Windows & Waterproofing North L11-L31
EIFS - North L11-Roof
Set Swing Stages - South Roof
Punch Windows & Waterproofing South L10-Roof
EIFS - South L10-Roof
EIFS - Hoist Leaveout
Set Swing Stages/Hydros - East L15
EIFS - East L2-15
Punch Windows East L2-L15
Set Swing Stages - East Roof
Punch Windows & Waterproofing East L16-L31
EIFS - East L16-Roof
Set Swing Stages/Hydros - West L15
EIFS - West L2-15
Punch Windows West L2-L15
Set Swing Stages - West Roof
Punch Windows & Waterproofing West L16-L31
EIFS - West L16-Roof
Temp Roof - L15
Temp Roof - Elevator Machine Room & L32 Openings
Install Permanent L32 Roof
Install Hoist
Hoist Service
Remove Hoist
Elevator Machine Room Buildout
Expedited Service Elevator
Passenger Elevator Buildout
Parking Buildout - L2
Parking Buildout - L3
Parking Buildout - L4
Parking Buildout - L5
Parking Buildout - L6
Parking Buildout - L7
Parking Buildout - L8
Parking Buildout - L9
1427 SOUTH BLVD - MAY 2023 - 100 DD Schedule CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC Page 4 of 6
1427 S Boulevard - Charlotte, North Carolina
Akridge/Kettler 100% DD Schedule May 15th, 2023
Activity Name Original
Duration
Start Finish
Parking Buildout - L10 15 20-Feb-26 12-Mar-26
MEP RISERS 264 29-May-24 11-Jun-25
MEP Risers - L2 15 29-May-24 18-Jun-24
MEP Risers - L3 15 12-Jun-24 02-Jul-24
MEP Risers - L4 15 26-Jun-24 17-Jul-24
MEP Risers - L5 15 11-Jul-24 31-Jul-24
MEP Risers - L6 15 25-Jul-24 14-Aug-24
MEP Risers - L7 15 08-Aug-24 28-Aug-24
MEP Risers - L8 15 22-Aug-24 12-Sep-24
MEP Risers - L9 15 06-Sep-24 26-Sep-24
MEP Risers - L10 15 18-Sep-24 08-Oct-24
MEP Risers - L11 15 30-Sep-24 18-Oct-24
MEP Risers - L12 15 10-Oct-24 30-Oct-24
MEP Risers - L13 15 22-Oct-24 11-Nov-24
MEP Risers - L14 15 01-Nov-24 21-Nov-24
MEP Risers - L15 15 13-Nov-24 05-Dec-24
MEP Risers - L16 15 25-Nov-24 17-Dec-24
MEP Risers - L17 15 09-Dec-24 30-Dec-24
MEP Risers - L18 15 19-Dec-24 10-Jan-25
MEP Risers - L19 15 02-Jan-25 22-Jan-25
MEP Risers - L20 15 14-Jan-25 03-Feb-25
MEP Risers - L21 15 24-Jan-25 13-Feb-25
MEP Risers - L22 15 05-Feb-25 25-Feb-25
MEP Risers - L23 15 17-Feb-25 07-Mar-25
MEP Risers - L24 15 27-Feb-25 19-Mar-25
MEP Risers - L25 15 11-Mar-25 31-Mar-25
MEP Risers - L26 15 21-Mar-25 10-Apr-25
MEP Risers - L27 15 02-Apr-25 22-Apr-25
MEP Risers - L28 15 16-Apr-25 06-May-25
MEP Risers - L29 15 30-Apr-25 20-May-25
MEP Risers - L30 15 07-May-25 28-May-25
MEP Risers - L31 15 14-May-25 04-Jun-25
MEP Risers - Stub to Roof 15 21-May-25 11-Jun-25
UNIT BUILDOUT 414 11-Jul-24 26-Feb-26
Buildout - MOCKUP UNIT 45 11-Jul-24 12-Sep-24
Buildout - L2 100 13-Sep-24 05-Feb-25
Buildout - L3 100 20-Sep-24 12-Feb-25
Buildout - L4 100 27-Sep-24 19-Feb-25
Buildout - L5 100 04-Oct-24 26-Feb-25
Buildout - L6 100 11-Oct-24 05-Mar-25
Buildout - L7 100 18-Oct-24 12-Mar-25
Buildout - L8 100 25-Oct-24 19-Mar-25
Buildout - L9 100 01-Nov-24 26-Mar-25
Buildout - L10 100 08-Nov-24 02-Apr-25
Buildout - L11 100 15-Nov-24 09-Apr-25
Buildout - L12 170 22-Nov-24 25-Jul-25
Buildout - L13 170 06-Dec-24 06-Aug-25
Buildout - L14 170 18-Dec-24 18-Aug-25
Buildout - L15 170 31-Dec-24 28-Aug-25
Buildout - L16 170 13-Jan-25 10-Sep-25
Buildout - L17 170 23-Jan-25 22-Sep-25
Buildout - L18 170 04-Feb-25 02-Oct-25
Buildout - L19 170 14-Feb-25 14-Oct-25
Buildout - L20 170 26-Feb-25 24-Oct-25
Buildout - L21 170 10-Mar-25 05-Nov-25
Buildout - L22 170 20-Mar-25 17-Nov-25
Buildout - L23 170 01-Apr-25 01-Dec-25
Buildout - L24 170 11-Apr-25 11-Dec-25
Buildout - L25 170 23-Apr-25 23-Dec-25
Buildout - L26 170 02-May-25 05-Jan-26
Buildout - L27 170 13-May-25 14-Jan-26
Buildout - L28 170 22-May-25 23-Jan-26
Buildout - L29 170 03-Jun-25 03-Feb-26
Buildout - L30 170 12-Jun-25 12-Feb-26
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
2023 2024 2025 2026
Parking Buildout - L10
MEP Risers - L2
MEP Risers - L3
MEP Risers - L4
MEP Risers - L5
MEP Risers - L6
MEP Risers - L7
MEP Risers - L8
MEP Risers - L9
MEP Risers - L10
MEP Risers - L11
MEP Risers - L12
MEP Risers - L13
MEP Risers - L14
MEP Risers - L15
MEP Risers - L16
MEP Risers - L17
MEP Risers - L18
MEP Risers - L19
MEP Risers - L20
MEP Risers - L21
MEP Risers - L22
MEP Risers - L23
MEP Risers - L24
MEP Risers - L25
MEP Risers - L26
MEP Risers - L27
MEP Risers - L28
MEP Risers - L29
MEP Risers - L30
MEP Risers - L31
MEP Risers - Stub to Roof
Buildout - MOCKUP UNIT
Buildout - L2
Buildout - L3
Buildout - L4
Buildout - L5
Buildout - L6
Buildout - L7
Buildout - L8
Buildout - L9
Buildout - L10
Buildout - L11
Buildout - L12
Buildout - L13
Buildout - L14
Buildout - L15
Buildout - L16
Buildout - L17
Buildout - L18
Buildout - L19
Buildout - L20
Buildout - L21
Buildout - L22
Buildout - L23
Buildout - L24
Buildout - L25
Buildout - L26
Buildout - L27
Buildout - L28
Buildout - L29
Buildout - L30
1427 SOUTH BLVD - MAY 2023 - 100 DD Schedule CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC Page 5 of 6
1427 S Boulevard - Charlotte, North Carolina
Akridge/Kettler 100% DD Schedule May 15th, 2023
Activity Name Original
Duration
Start Finish
Buildout - L31 170 23-Jun-25 23-Feb-26
Buildout - Hoist Unit Leaveouts & Comeback Work 95 13-Oct-25 26-Feb-26
LOBBY/AMENITY BUILDOUT 358 08-Nov-24 10-Apr-26
Buildout L10 Amenity (Interior)150 08-Nov-24 13-Jun-25
Install Lobby Storefront 15 06-Mar-25 26-Mar-25
Buildout Lobby 150 27-Mar-25 27-Oct-25
Buildout L31 Amenity Space 180 19-Jun-25 05-Mar-26
Install Retail Storefront/Ext Walls 20 22-Sep-25 17-Oct-25
Buildout L10 Amenity (Exterior)126 13-Oct-25 10-Apr-26
L1 Retail Buildout (Core and Shell)60 20-Oct-25 15-Jan-26
L10 Amenity Buildout (Ext./Podium Leave-Out)125 13-Oct-25 10-Apr-26
Knee Wall Layout 5 13-Oct-25 17-Oct-25
Concrete Pads and Curbs 5 20-Oct-25 24-Oct-25
Set Condensing Units 15 27-Oct-25 14-Nov-25
Pool Curbs and Walls 8 27-Oct-25 05-Nov-25
CIP Steps at Area Wells 3 06-Nov-25 10-Nov-25
Set Drain Bodies 3 06-Nov-25 10-Nov-25
Trellis Structures 5 06-Nov-25 12-Nov-25
Stair 3 - CMU Walls 5 06-Nov-25 12-Nov-25
Misc. Metals and Other Support 10 13-Nov-25 26-Nov-25
Stair 3 - Roofing 5 13-Nov-25 19-Nov-25
Condensing CMU Walls/Etc.10 13-Nov-25 26-Nov-25
Condensing Well Knee Walls/Curbs/Etc.6 17-Nov-25 24-Nov-25
Stair 3 - Cladding 10 20-Nov-25 05-Dec-25
Waterproof - Area Wells/MEP 5 25-Nov-25 03-Dec-25
Handrails, Guardrails, Bollards, Etc.10 01-Dec-25 12-Dec-25
Waterproof - Planters/Boxes 5 15-Dec-25 19-Dec-25
Set SST Trench Drain 8 15-Dec-25 24-Dec-25
Waterproof - Walkways 15 26-Dec-25 16-Jan-26
Waterproof - Pool 10 19-Jan-26 30-Jan-26
Elevated Wood Walkways/Decks 15 19-Jan-26 06-Feb-26
Set Planter Boxes 5 09-Feb-26 13-Feb-26
Pedestal Pavers 29 09-Feb-26 20-Mar-26
Soil, Plants, and Trees 20 17-Feb-26 16-Mar-26
Pool Fill, Testing, Commissioning 15 23-Mar-26 10-Apr-26
MEP 289 25-Jul-24 12-Sep-25
Electrical Vault Construction 30 25-Jul-24 05-Sep-24
Switchgear, ATS Rooms 30 08-Aug-24 19-Sep-24
Generator Room 20 22-Aug-24 19-Sep-24
Set Roof Top Equipment 15 30-Apr-25 20-May-25
Rooftop Mechanical (Condensers)80 21-May-25 12-Sep-25
LANDSCAPE/HARDSCAPE 60 22-Sep-25 16-Dec-25
Site Hardscape 30 22-Sep-25 31-Oct-25
Site Landscaping 30 03-Nov-25 16-Dec-25
OCCUPANCY & COMMISSIONING 146 15-Sep-25 10-Apr-26
Commissioning L2-L11 50 15-Sep-25 21-Nov-25
Commissioning L12-L22 50 18-Nov-25 30-Jan-26
Commissioning & Life Safety L23-Roof 50 02-Feb-26 10-Apr-26
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
2023 2024 2025 2026
Buildout - L31
Buildout - Hoist Unit Leaveouts & Comeback Work
Buildout L10 Amenity (Interior)
Install Lobby Storefront
Buildout Lobby
Buildout L31 Amenity Space
Install Retail Storefront/Ext Walls
Buildout L10 Amenity (Exterior)
L1 Retail Buildout (Core and Shell)
Knee Wall Layout
Concrete Pads and Curbs
Set Condensing Units
Pool Curbs and Walls
CIP Steps at Area Wells
Set Drain Bodies
Trellis Structures
Stair 3 - CMU Walls
Misc. Metals and Other Support
Stair 3 - Roofing
Condensing CMU Walls/Etc.
Condensing Well Knee Walls/Curbs/Etc.
Stair 3 - Cladding
Waterproof - Area Wells/MEP
Handrails, Guardrails, Bollards, Etc.
Waterproof - Planters/Boxes
Set SST Trench Drain
Waterproof - Walkways
Waterproof - Pool
Elevated Wood Walkways/Decks
Set Planter Boxes
Pedestal Pavers
Soil, Plants, and Trees
Pool Fill, Testing, Commissioning
Electrical Vault Construction
Switchgear, ATS Rooms
Generator Room
Set Roof Top Equipment
Rooftop Mechanical (Condensers)
Site Hardscape
Site Landscaping
Commissioning L2-L11
Commissioning L12-L22
Commissioning & Life Safety L23-Roof
1427 SOUTH BLVD - MAY 2023 - 100 DD Schedule CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC Page 6 of 6
1427 S Boulevard - Charlotte, North Carolina
Akridge/Kettler 100% DD Schedule May 15th, 2023