25046 Harrelson Ford Brownfields Assessment Report 20220322

Via Email

March 22, 2022

NCDEQ – Division of Waste Management
Brownfields Program
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, Noth Carolina 27699-1646

Attn: Mr. Bill Schmithorst

Re: Brownfields Assessment Report
Harrelson Ford
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 25046-21-060
H&H Project No. ACO-002

Dear Mr. Schmithorst:

On behalf of TAC Harrelson Ford, LLC, enclosed please find a copy of the Brownfields
Assessment Report documenting recent sampling activities completed at the Harrelson Ford
Brownfields property located in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County.

Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact
us at [phone].

Sincerely,
Hart & Hickman, PC
Haley Martin, PG Ralph McGee, PG
Senior Project Geologist Project Manager

Enclosure

cc: Mr. Tyson Reilly, The Ardent Companies (Via Email)
Mr. Sam Lumpkin, McGuireWoods (Via Email)
i

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
Brownfields Assessment Report
Harrelson Ford
6500 South Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 25046-21-060
H&H Job No. ACO-002

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................1 
1.1 Previous Assessment Activities .............................................................................................1 
1.2 Brownfields Activities ...........................................................................................................5 
2.0 Brownfields Assessment Activities ........................................................................................6 
3.0 Soil Assessment Activities .......................................................................................................7 
3.1 Soil Sampling Activities ........................................................................................................7 
3.2 Soil Sample Analytical Results .............................................................................................8 
4.0 Soil Gas Assessment Activities ...............................................................................................9 
4.1 Soil Gas Sampling Activities .................................................................................................9 
4.2 Soil Gas Sampling Results ..................................................................................................12 
4.3 Vapor Intrusion Risk Evaluation .........................................................................................13 
5.0 Quality Assurance – Quality Control ..................................................................................15 
6.0 Summary and Conclusions ..................................................................................................16 

ii

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
List of Tables

Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Data
Table 2 Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Data

List of Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Sample Location Map

List of Appendices

Appendix A Soil Gas Field Forms and Soil Boring Logs
Appendix B Laboratory Analytical Report
Appendix C DEQ Risk Calculators

1

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
Brownfields Assessment Report
Harrelson Ford
6500 South Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 25046-21-060
H&H Job No. ACO-002

1.0 Introduction

On behalf of TAC Harrelson Ford, LLC, Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) has prepared this report to
document Brownfields assessment activities recently completed at the Harrelson Ford
Brownfields property (Brownfields Project No. 25046-21-060) located at 6500 South Boulevard
in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (Site). The Site consists of one parcel (Parcel
Identification No. 17304204) that totals approximately 10.6 acres of land located in a mixed light
industrial, commercial, and residential use area approximately five miles south of uptown
Charlotte. A Site location map is provided as Figure 1.

The northern portion of the Site is developed with an unoccupied approximate 2,000 square foot
(sq ft) warehouse (Building 1), an approximate 9,300 sq ft service garage (Building 2), an
unoccupied approximate 20,000 square foot (sq ft) vehicle showroom and service garage
(Building 3), and one unoccupied approximate 14,000 sq ft service garage (Building 4).
Remaining portions of the Site consist of paved access drives, parking areas, and equipment
material staging areas. The Site and surrounding area are shown in Figure 2.

Proposed redevelopment of the Brownfields property includes razing the existing Site buildings
and leveling the Site for construction of a townhome development. This report has been
prepared to document additional soil and soil gas assessment activities completed in the areas of
Building 2 through Building 4 of the Harrelson Ford Brownfields Property.

1.1 Previous Assessment Activities

March 2021 Phase I ESA
In March 2021, H&H completed Phase I ESA activities and identified the following
2

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
environmental concerns in connection with the Site:

 The Site has been utilized for automotive repair and maintenance operations since the
early 1970s. Automotive repair operations likely used petroleum products and/or
chlorinated solvents. The Site is also listed in the environmental databases as generator
of hazardous wastes as early as 1989. There are no release incidents reported in the
environmental databases associated with hazardous wastes or historical automotive repair
and maintenance operations at the Site. However, H&H observed oil staining, degraded
surfaces, unlabeled 55-gallon drums and 275-gallon plastic totes of unknown fluids, a
wash bay with associated floor drains, and open waste oil pans/containers in multiple
areas in and around the Site buildings during the Site reconnaissance. Based on the
reported use of hazardous materials and observations at the time of Site reconnaissance
activities, the potential for impact from an undocumented release or releases associated
with over 40 years of on-Site auto repair operations was identified as an environmental
concern.

 During the Site reconnaissance, H&H observed evidence of four (4) potential
underground storage tanks (USTs) within and adjacent to Building 3 (i.e., fill ports and/or
vent piping). Aside from the UST removed in 1993 (discussed below), no other USTs
are listed for the Site in the environmental databases. The potential for impact from an
undocumented release associated with the potential USTs and the potential for additional
unidentified USTs was identified as an environmental concern.

 H&H observed approximately twenty out-of-use in-ground hydraulic lifts in the service
garage of Building 3 and one out-of-use in-ground hydraulic lift in the service garage of
Building 2. Details associated with the in-ground lifts (i.e., installation dates, service
records, closure records, etc.) were not available at the time of the Phase I ESA. Based
on the lack of reports documenting lift system closure, the potential for impact to the Site
from an undocumented release from the hydraulic lift systems was identified as an
environmental concern.

 A trench drain and oil-water separator (OWS) system was installed during construction of
3

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
the southern Site building (Building 4) in the mid- to late-1990s. At the time of Site
reconnaissance activities, standing fluids were observed within the trench drains located
in the maintenance area of the Site building. Based on the age of the trench drain and
OWS system and the observed conditions of the trench drain within the building, the
potential for impacts to the Site associated with a release from the trench drain and OWS
system was identified as an environmental concern.

A Historical Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC) is generally defined as an
environmental concern which involves a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum
products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority and that
is not subject to activity and/or use limitations. H&H identified the following HREC in
connection with the Site:

 Based upon review of available environmental reports, one 3,000-gallon motor oil UST
was removed from the Site in February 1993. After removal of the UST, three soil
samples were collected for laboratory analysis from the base of the UST basin. Two soil
samples were submitted for laboratory analysis of oil and grease by EPA Method 9071
and halogenated solvents by EPA Method 8021 and one soil sample was submitted for
metals by toxicity characteristic leachate procedure (TCLP).

Soil sample laboratory analytical results indicated that oil and grease (up to 630
milligrams per kilogram {mg/kg}) was detected at concentrations above the North
Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) UST Section Action Level at the
time of 250 mg/kg (Incident No. 13888). Halogenated solvents and metals were not
detected in the soil samples at concentrations above the regulatory screening criteria.

A Site Sensitivity Evaluation (SSE) was completed for the Site to evaluate potential risks
associated with residual oil and grease concentrations in soil in the area of the former
UST. Results of the SSE indicated that no water supply wells were identified within a
1,500 ft radius of the release incident. Based on results of the SSE, the DEQ UST
Section issued a No Further Action (NFA) letter on August 6, 1996. Based on the closed
4

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
regulatory status of the incident without implementation of land or activity use
restrictions, the release associated with the former 3,000-gallon motor oil UST represents
a HREC in connection with the Site.

2021 Phase II ESA
In August 2021, H&H performed Phase II ESA activities at the Site. Assessment activities
included the advancement of eight (8) soil borings near areas of concern (i.e., drains, former and
suspect USTs, and an OWS), three (3) background soil borings, and twenty-four (24) soil
borings adjacent to former in-ground hydraulic lifts for a total of thirty-four (34) soil samples
selected for laboratory analysis. Assessment activities also included groundwater sample
collection from five (5) temporary monitoring wells. Additionally, fifteen (15) soil gas samples
were collected within the footprint of proposed townhome buildings. Soil, groundwater, and soil
gas sample locations from the 2021 Phase II ESA are depicted in Figure 3.

Results of the soil assessment activities completed in the vicinity of the former in-ground
hydraulic lifts identified total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel range organics (TPH-DRO)
concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Level of 100 mg/kg at six of the twenty-four
lift systems. Hexavalent chromium was detected in samples collected near the former in-ground
hydraulic lifts, trench drains associated with the OWS system, and former wash bay floor drain
above the DEQ Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Residential Preliminary Soil
Remediation Goals (PSRGs) and background concentrations. No other compounds were
detected at concentrations above the DEQ screening criteria in soil samples collected at the Site.

Results of groundwater assessment activities completed in upgradient and downgradient portions
of the Site and in areas of environmental concern did not identify compounds at concentrations
above DEQ 2L Groundwater Quality Standards (2L Standards) or the DEQ Division of Waste
Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSLs).

Results of soil gas assessment activities completed within the footprint of the proposed
townhome buildings identified several compounds at concentrations above the DEQ DWM
Residential and/or Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs). The
5

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
compounds ethylbenzene was detected in sample SG-7, installed adjacent to Building 3 (Figure
3), at a concentration above the DWM Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSL of 490 µg/m3.
Laboratory analytical results for sample SG-7 also detected concentrations of 1,2,4-
trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-trimethybenzene, m&p-xylene, o-xylene, n-heptane, n-hexane, and
tetrachloroethene (PCE) exceeding the DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSLs. Risk
calculator results using compound concentrations detected in the soil gas samples indicate that
the worst-case calculated cumulative lifetime incremental carcinogenic risk (LICR) and hazard
index (HI) values exceed the DEQ and EPA acceptable thresholds of 1 x 10-4 and 1.0,
respectively.

1.2 Brownfields Activities

To address environmental concerns associated with historical on-Site and off-Site operations, the
Site was entered into the DEQ Brownfields Program and received eligibility in a letter dated
October 29, 2021. The PD elected to participate in the Brownfields Program Redevelopment
Now option. As part of this process, a kick-off meeting with PD, environmental counsel for the
PD, DEQ Brownfields personnel, and H&H was held on January 13, 2022 to discuss prior Site
history, proposed redevelopment plans, previous sampling data, and the proposed schedule for
completing the Brownfields Agreement.

The purpose of the Brownfields assessment activities described herein were completed to address
DEQ Brownfields Program requests for additional assessment provided in an email dated
January 24, 2022. DEQ Brownfields requests for additional assessment included collection of
sub-slab soil gas samples within Building 2 through Building 4 where no samples were
previously collected, and collection of an exterior soil gas sample north of Building 3 to further
evaluate impacts in the area of Phase II ESA soil gas sample SG-7 (Figure 3). In addition, DEQ
requested collection of a soil sample for laboratory analysis in the area of Phase II ESA soil gas
sample location SG-7 to evaluate the potential for impacts in soil adjacent to Building 3.
6

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
2.0 Brownfields Assessment Activities

To address the DEQ Brownfields Program request for additional assessment, H&H prepared a
Brownfields Assessment Work Plan (Work Plan) dated February 7, 2022. The DEQ Brownfields
Program provided approval of the Work Plan in an email dated February 11, 2022. H&H
completed the additional assessment activities at the Site on February 16 and 17, 2022.

The assessment activities were conducted in general accordance with the DEQ Inactive
Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of Contaminated Sites
(Guidelines) dated January 2020, the DEQ DWM Vapor Intrusion Guidance (VI Guidance)
dated March 2018, most recent versions of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Region IV Laboratory Services and Applied Science Division (LSASD) Field Branches Quality
System and Technical Procedures guidance, and the DEQ-approved Work Plan.

Prior to conducting the assessment field activities, H&H contacted North Carolina 811, the
public utility locator, to mark subsurface utilities located on the Site. H&H also contracted with
a private utility locator to screen proposed sample locations for subgrade utilities that may not
have been marked by the public locator. Additionally, boring locations were hand cleared to
approximately 5 ft bgs prior to use of mechanical drilling equipment to further screen the boring
locations for the presence of subsurface utilities.

A summary of the soil sample activities and results is provided in Section 3.0, and the soil gas
sampling activities and results are described in Section 4.0. Quality control and quality
assurance details are provided in Section 5.0, and summary and conclusions based on results of
the assessment activities are provided in Section 6.0.
7

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
3.0 Soil Assessment Activities

3.1 Soil Sampling Activities

On February 17, 2022, H&H collected one soil sample (SB-9) to evaluate the potential for
impacts from former auto repair operations on the northern side of Building 3 where impacts
were identified in soil gas (SG-7) during previous Phase II sampling activities. The location of
the soil boring is shown in Figure 3.

The soil boring was advanced utilizing a decontaminated stainless-steel hand auger to
approximately 5 ft bgs and a track-mounted direct push technology (DPT) drill rig to
approximately 10 ft bgs. During boring advancement, continuous soil samples were collected
from the center of the hand auger bucket or from acetate lined DPT macrocore sleeves. The soil
samples were logged for lithological description and field screened for indication of potential
impacts by observation for obvious staining, unusual odors, and the presence of volatile organic
vapors using a calibrated photoionization detector (PID).

Results of field screening did not indicate obvious evidence of potential impacts. Therefore, a
soil sample was collected from the 6 to 7 ft bgs depth interval similar to the depth of previous
Phase II ESA soil gas sample SG-7. A duplicate soil sample was also collected from the SB-9
soil boring from the 6 to 7 ft bgs depth interval. A boring log including lithologic descriptions
and field screening results for the SB-9 soil boring are provided in Appendix A.

The soil sample selected for laboratory analysis was placed in dedicated laboratory supplied
sample containers, labeled with the sample identification, date, and requested analysis, and
placed in a laboratory supplied cooler with ice. The sample was delivered to a Waypoint
Analytical (Waypoint) under standard chain of custody protocols for laboratory analysis of semi-
VOCs (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
metals by EPA Methods 6020/7471, and hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199. In
addition, a sample from an undisturbed portion of soil was collected for volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260.
8

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
Following sampling activities, the soil boring was properly abandoned and the surface was
repaired similar to pre-drilling conditions. In addition, the soil boring location was estimated
using a hand-held global positioning system (GPS) unit.

3.2 Soil Sample Analytical Results

Laboratory analytical results were compared to the DEQ IHSB Residential and
Industrial/Commercial Preliminary Soil Remedial Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2022. In
addition to the IHSB PSRGs, metals results were compared to published concentrations for
naturally occurring metals in North Carolina soil as well as Site-specific background levels.

A tabular summary of the soil sample laboratory analytical results for organic constituents is
presented Table 1A, and a tabular summary of the soil sample laboratory analytical results for
metals is provided in Table 1B. In addition to the SB-9 soil sample analytical results, laboratory
analytical results for samples collected during previous Phase II ESA activities are also
summarized in Table 1A and Table 1B. A copy of the SB-9 soil sample laboratory analytical
report and chain of custody record is provided in Appendix B.

Laboratory analytical results indicate that a low level of hexavalent chromium (0.91 mg/kg) was
detected at a concentration above the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRG of 0.31 mg/kg and
background concentrations in the SB-9 soil sample. No other compounds, including petroleum-
related compounds or chlorinated solvents detected in SG-7 were detected at concentrations
above the DEQ IHSB PSRGs.

Results of soil sampling completed in the vicinity of the soil gas sample SG-7 indicate that there
is not obvious evidence of a soil source adjacent to the northern side of Building 3.
9

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
4.0 Soil Gas Assessment Activities

To further evaluate the potential for structural vapor intrusion, H&H installed six (6) temporary
sub-slab soil gas (SSV-1 through SSV-6) monitoring points within the footprints of existing Site
buildings. In addition, one (1) exterior soil gas (SG-16) monitoring point was installed and
sampled to further evaluate the potential for structural vapor intrusion into proposed townhome
buildings in areas located northeast of Building 3. Please note, that soil gas monitoring point
SSV-5 was proposed to be installed as a typical sub-slab soil gas monitoring point for collection
of vapor just beneath the slab. However, due to perched water encountered beneath the western
portion of the Building 3 slab, the monitoring point was installed into soil beneath the slab and is
considered representative of soil gas conditions beneath the building. This deviation from the
DEQ-approved Work Plan was discussed and approved by the Brownfield Program project
manager on a call held on February 17, 2022.

The approximate locations of the soil gas and sub-slab soil gas sampling point locations are
shown in Figure 3. Details of the sampling activities and results are described below.

4.1 Soil Gas Sampling Activities

Soil Gas Sample Point Installation
Under the direction of H&H, Mid-South Environmental advanced two (2) soil borings for the
installation of temporary soil gas monitoring points (SG-16 and SSV-5) to further evaluate the
potential for structural vapor intrusion into proposed townhome buildings in areas located
northeast of Building 3 and within the western portion of the existing Site Building 4. As noted
above, sub-slab soil gas sampling point SSV-5 was installed in soil beneath Building 4 due to the
presence of perched water just beneath the slab. The locations of the temporary soil gas
sampling points are shown on Figure 3.

The soil gas monitoring points were installed to a depth of 7 ft bgs and above the estimated depth
of the water table capillary fringe. Each soil boring was advanced using DPT drilling methods
however, SSV-5 was installed utilizing a concrete core drill until soil was encountered and then
advanced using DPT drilling methods. Continuous soil samples were collected from the soil gas
10

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
monitoring point borings and logged for lithologic description, observed for obvious evidence of
staining and unusual odors, and field screened for the presence of volatile organic compounds
using a calibrated PID. Field screening results did not indicate obvious evidence of potential
impacts in the soil gas monitoring point borings.

Once at target depth, a six-inch stainless steel vapor implant screen attached to a length of
Teflon® tubing was then placed at the base of the borehole. Annular space around the vapor
implant screen was filled with filter sand to a depth of approximately 6-inches above the top of
the vapor screen. The temporary monitoring points were completed by placing hydrated
bentonite from the top of the filter sand to the ground surface. Soil gas sampling points were
allowed to equilibrate after installation and prior to sample collection. Boring logs including
lithologic descriptions, field screening results, and soil gas monitoring point construction details
are provided in Appendix A.

Sub-Slab Soil Gas Sample Point Installation
H&H installed five (5) sub-slab soil gas sample points (SSV-1 through SSV-4, and SSV-6)
within the existing Site buildings (Building 2, Building 3, and Building 4) and collected samples
to further evaluate impacts associated with historical auto repair operations. The sub-slab soil
gas sample locations are shown on Figure 3.

The sub-slab soil gas sampling points were installed using a rotary hammer drill and 1½-inch
diameter drill bit to advance a pilot hole into the concrete slab to a depth of approximately 1¾
inches below the slab surface. A drill guide was then placed within the pilot hole, and a 5/8-inch
diameter drill bit was utilized to advance a boring through the concrete slab and approximately 5
to 6-inches into the underlying soil. Following concrete borehole advancement, loose concrete
cuttings were removed from each boring using a bottlebrush. A Cox-Colvin Vapor PinTM (vapor
pin) assembly (brass sampling point and silicone sleeve) was then seated in the borehole using an
installation/extraction tool and dead blow hammer to form an air tight seal. Upon installation of
the vapor pin assembly, dedicated Teflon® sample tubing was connected to the barbed end of the
vapor pin.
11

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
Soil Gas and Sub-Slab Soil Gas Sampling
Each soil gas and sub-slab soil gas sample was collected utilizing a 1-liter laboratory supplied
batch certified stainless-steel Summa® canister connected to an air-flow regulator calibrated by
the laboratory to collect the soil gas sample at a rate of approximately 100 milliliters per minute.
Prior to sample collection, a “shut-in” test was conducted on the sampling train and helium leak
checks were conducted at each sampling point. The purpose of the shut-in test and helium leak
check is to ensure short circuiting with ambient air does not occur during sampling. A
description of the shut-in test and helium leak testing procedures is provided below.

The shut-in test was conducted by connecting the flow regulator with the vacuum gauge to the
Summa® canister and sealing the flow regulator with the laboratory provided brass cap. Once
the sampling train was “closed”, the sample valve on the Summa® canister was opened and the
reading on the vacuum gauge was recorded. The Summa® canister sample valve was then closed
and the vacuum gauge was observed to ensure there was no vacuum loss due to an unsealed
connection in the sampling equipment train. If the vacuum reading remained the same, the shut-
in test was considered successful. If vacuum loss occurred, connections in the sampling
equipment train were adjusted/tightened, the brass cap was reseated, and the shut-in test was
repeated until the vacuum reading remained stable. Each sample train passed the shut-in test.

Following the shut-in test, the Summa® canister was connected to the sample point Teflon®
sample tubing using a brass nut and ferrule assembly to create an air tight seal and the leak check
was performed. The leak check was performed by constructing a shroud over the completed
sample train at each sampling point and flooding the air with helium gas. Helium concentrations
inside the shroud were measured using a calibrated helium gas detector and maintained at
concentrations of approximately 15% to 17%. Once helium concentrations stabilized within the
shroud, the sample tubing was purged outside of the shroud using a syringe and a three-way
valve to collect purged soil gas into a Tedlar® bag. The purged soil gas was then analyzed using
the helium gas detector to ensure that helium concentrations in the sampling train are less than
10% of the helium concentrations measure within the shroud. Each soil gas sampling point
passed the helium check criteria.
12

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
Following a successful leak check, the soil gas samples were collected by opening the intake
valve on the Summa®. Vacuum readings on the Summa® canister were recorded prior to and
following the sampling period to ensure adequate sample volume was collected. A vacuum of
approximately 5 inches of mercury or more was maintained within the canisters at the conclusion
of the sampling event in accordance with DEQ DWM guidance.

Following sample collection, the Summa® canisters were placed in laboratory supplied shipping
containers, properly labeled, and shipped under standard chain-of-custody protocols to Waypoint
for analysis of VOCs by EPA Method TO-15. Upon receipt of the samples, the laboratory
recorded the final received vacuum pressure for each Summa® canister.

After sample collection, the sample locations were estimated by measuring from known
benchmarks within the building (e.g., doors, windows, exterior walls, etc.). The sample
locations were properly abandoned and the surfaces were repaired similar to pre-drilling
conditions.

4.2 Soil Gas Sampling Results

A tabular summary of the soil gas sample analytical results is provided as Table 2. Laboratory
analytical results for the soil gas samples were compared to the DEQ DWM Residential and
Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSLs dated January 2022. A copy of the laboratory analytical
reports and chain of custody record is provided in Appendix B.

Sub-slab soil gas sample laboratory analytical results identified the presence of PCE at a
concentration above the DEQ DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion Soil Gas Screening Level
(SGSL) of 280 µg/m3 in soil gas samples collected in Building 2 (523 micrograms per cubic
meter {µg/m3}), Building 3 (range from 1,090 µg/m3 to 6,670 µg/m3), and Building 4 (647
µg/m3). Note that the PCE concentration detected in sub-slab soil gas sample SSV-2 collected
within Building 3 also exceeds the Non-Residential SGSL of 3,500 µg/m3.

In addition to PCE, results of sub-slab soil gas samples collected within Building 4 indicate that
13

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
TCE (26.9 µg/m3) and vinyl chloride (11,700 µg/m3) were detected at concentrations of the DEQ
DWM Vapor Intrusion SGSLs. The non-chlorinated compounds benzene (up to 25.9 µg/m3),
1,3-butadiene (up to 22.1 µg/m3), chloroform (up to 12.1 µg/m3), ethylbenzene (up to 61.6
µg/m3), and naphthalene (up to 2.91 µg/m3) were also detected at concentrations above the DEQ
DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSLs in soil gas samples collected at the Site.

Low concentrations of benzene (20.9 µg/m3) and naphthalene (2.91 µg/m3) were detected at
concentrations above the Residential SGSL in exterior soil gas sample SG-16 collected north of
previous soil gas sample SG-7. No other compounds including chlorinated solvents were
detected in the SG-16 soil gas sample.

No other constituents were detected at concentrations exceeding DEQ DWM Vapor Intrusion
SGSLs in the soil gas samples collected at the Site.

4.3 Vapor Intrusion Risk Evaluation

The DEQ DWM SGSLs are conservative and based upon a Target Cancer Risk (TCR) of 1 x 10-6
for potential carcinogenic effects and a Target Hazard Quotient (THQ) of 0.2 for potential non-
carcinogenic effects. Vapor intrusion mitigation or additional assessment is not typically
warranted if the calculated cumulative lifetime incremental carcinogenic risk (LICR) is 1 x 10-4
or less and the acceptable level for non-carcinogenic risk is a hazard index (HI) of 1.0 or less.

H&H utilized the DEQ Risk Calculator (January 2022) assuming a residential land use scenario
to further evaluate potential cumulative risks for the soil gas to indoor air vapor intrusion
pathway for the proposed residential buildings. To model the potential for vapor intrusion under
a hypothetical “worst-case” scenario, H&H conservatively calculated the cumulative risks using
the highest concentration of any compound detected in any soil gas sample collected within Site
Building 2, Building 3, Building 4, and in the exterior area of the proposed townhome buildings
located north of Building 3. Risk calculator results are summarized in the table below.
14

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc

Risk calculator results indicate that under a hypothetical worst-case scenario for the soil gas to
indoor air vapor intrusion pathway for residential use, the cumulative LICR is less than the
acceptable risk level of 1 x 10-4 for Building 2 and the exterior area north of Building 3.
However, the cumulative risks exceed the acceptable levels using sample data from Building 3
and Building 4.

H&H understands that a DEQ Brownfields Program approved vapor intrusion mitigation system
designed by a North Carolina licensed Professional Engineer will be installed during
construction of the proposed buildings. Copies of the completed risk calculators are provided in
Appendix F.
Evaluation Area Land Use
Scenario
Calculated
Cumulative
LICR
Calculated
Cumulative HI
Exceedance of
Acceptable
Levels?
Building 2 (interior) Residential 5.6 x 10-6 0.41 No
Non-Residential 4.3 x 10-7 0.033 No
Building 3 (interior) Residential 2.0 x 10-5 4.9 Yes
Non-Residential 1.5 x 10-6 0.39 No
Building 4 (interior) Residential 2.1 x 10-3 5.6 Yes
Non-Residential 4.3 x 10-5 0.45 No
North of Building 3
(exterior)
Residential 3.3 x 10-6 0.084 No
Non-Residential 2.5 x 10-7 0.0066 No
15

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
5.0 Quality Assurance – Quality Control

For quality assurance and quality control purposes (QA/QC), non-dedicated equipment and tools
were decontaminated prior to use at each boring or sampling location or following exposure to
soil. In addition, H&H collected duplicate soil and soil gas samples to evaluate the ability of the
laboratory to reproduce sample results. Duplicate samples were submitted to the laboratory for
the same analysis as the corresponding parent sample.

The duplicate soil sample was collected directly into an individual laboratory supplied sample
container using sampling methodologies described in Section 3.0. The duplicate soil gas sample
was collected concurrently with the parent sample using a laboratory supplied T-fitting which
allowed for collection of two soil gas samples from one soil gas sampling point simultaneously.
The samples were analyzed for the same parameters as the parent samples, and the analytical
results were compared with those of the parent sample. The analytical results of the parent
sample and the duplicate sample were used to evaluate the cumulative precision of the analytical
method, sample matrix, and sample collection techniques.

Duplicate sample laboratory analytical results for each sample media are presented in the
summary tables (Table 1A and Table 1B for soil, and Table 2 for soil gas). Review of the
duplicate sample results in comparison to the parent sample results indicated that the duplicate
samples had good analytical reproducibility.
16

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
6.0 Summary and Conclusions

In February 2022, H&H completed Brownfields assessment activities at the Harrelson Ford
Brownfields property in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County. The assessment activities were
completed to address DEQ Brownfields Program requests for the collection of soil, and sub-slab
and exterior soil gas samples to further evaluate impacts associated with historical auto repair
operations conducted at the Site and in the area of previous Phase II ESA sample location SG-7
where impacts were identified in soil gas north of Building 3. A brief summary of the
Brownfields assessment activities is provided below.

Soil Sampling
One (1) soil sample was collected in the vicinity of the previously assessed soil gas sample SG-7,
located north of Building 3. Laboratory analytical results indicated a low level of hexavalent
chromium at a concentration above the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs and background metals
but below the DEQ IHSB Commercial/Industrial PSRGs. No organic compounds with the
exception of a trace level of acetone were detected at concentrations above the laboratory method
detection limits.

Soil Gas Sampling
Soil gas sample laboratory analytical results identified multiple chlorinated solvents at
concentrations exceeding the DEQ DWM Residential and Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion
SGSLs at the Site. In addition, multiple non-chlorinated compounds were also detected at
concentrations above the DEQ DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSLs in soil gas samples
collected at the Site. Soil gas sample SSV-2, collected from the western interior portion of
Building 3, and soil gas sample SSV-5, collected from the interior western portion of Building 4,
indicated the presence of PCE and vinyl chloride exceeding the DEQ Non-Residential Vapor
Intrusion SGSLs. Chloroform, benzene, ethylbenzene, naphthalene, PCE, and TCE were
detected above the Residential SGSLs in other soil gas samples.

To further evaluate the potential vapor intrusion risks for the proposed Site buildings, H&H
utilized the DEQ Risk Calculator (January 2022) using the highest compound concentrations
17

https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/masterfiles-1/shared documents/aaa-master projects/ardent - aco/aco.002 - 6500
south boulevard/brownfields/assessment/report/25046 - brownfields assessment report_harrelson ford.doc
detected in any soil gas sample within each building footprint to simulate a hypothetical “worst-
case” scenario for residential use. The results of the risk calculations for the interior of Building
2 and the exterior area, north of Building 3, did not indicate cumulative risk exceeding the
acceptable risk levels. However, the results of the risk calculations for the interior areas of
Building 3 and Building 4 indicated cumulative carcinogenic LICR and HI values above the
above the acceptable level of 1 x 10-4 and 1.0, respectively.

In summary, chlorinated solvent and petroleum-related impacts are present in sub-slab and soil
gas in Site buildings historically used for auto repair operations. Groundwater and exterior soil
gas sample analytical results from 2021 Phase II ESA activities, and exterior soil gas sample
laboratory analytical results did not identify chlorinated compounds at concentrations above the
applicable screening levels in samples collected near the existing Site buildings and in areas
downgradient of auto repair operations.

Based on the chlorinated compound concentrations detected within the Site buildings, it appears
there may be a release to soil beneath the existing buildings (i.e., soil source) that may need to be
managed during proposed redevelopment (if identified). Additionally, the shallow soil beneath
the Site buildings will be characterized and managed during grading activities and prior to being
re-used on-Site as fill or transported to a DEQ-approved disposal facility. Management of soil
beneath existing building slabs will also be incorporated into the Environmental Management
Plan (EMP). Potential vapor intrusion into proposed residential buildings will be managed in
accordance with the DEQ Brownfields Program approved Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Plan.

Tables
Table 1ASummary of Organic Constituent Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDHL-1 HL-2 HL-3 HL-4 HL-5 HL-6 HL-7 HL-8 HL-9 HL-10 HL-11 HL-12 HL-13 HL-14Depth (ft bgs)Sample DateUnitsTPH (8015C)DRO (C10-C28)<3.6 <3.8 <3.7 <4.14.1 J 4.5 J<3.94.9 J<3.81,3104.3 J<3.7 <3.710.2-- --100PCBs (8082A)ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL-- ----VOCs (8260D)AcetoneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.35NA NA NA NA14,000 210,000--2-Butanone (MEK)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.031 NA NA NA NA5,500 40,000--n-ButylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.12NA NA NA NA780 12,000--sec-ButylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0028 NA NA NA NA1,600 23,000--ChloroformNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0039 NA NA NA NA0.340 1.5--1,1-DichloroethaneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.0035 JNA NA NA NA3.8 17--cis-1,2-DichloretheneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0022 NA NA NA NA31 470--EthylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.042NA NA NA NA627--Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0022 NA NA NA NA410 2,100--p-IsopropyltolueneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0031 NA NA NA NANE NE--Methylene ChlorideNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.017 NA NA NA NA58 650--Methyl-tert-butyl etherNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0024 NA NA NA NA49 220--NaphthaleneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.052NA NA NA NA2.1 8.8--n-PropylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0023 NA NA NA NA780.0 5,100.0--TetrachloroetheneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.14NA NA NA NA17 82--TolueneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.039NA NA NA NA990 9,700--TrichloroetheneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.012NA NA NA NA0.87 4--1,2,4-TrimethylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.38NA NA NA NA63 430--1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.17NA NA NA NA56 320--m&p-XyleneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.17NA NA NA NA120 140--o-XyleneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.084NA NA NA NA140 590--Xylene (Total)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.25NA NA NA NA120 530--SVOCs (8270E)Di-n-butylphthalateNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.31 JNA NA NA NA1,300 16,000--bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.15 NA NA NA NA39 160--1-MethylnaphthaleneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.13 NA NA NA NA18 73--2-MethylnaphthaleneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.15 NA NA NA NA48 600--PhenanthreneNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.12 NA NA NA NANE NE--Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2022. 2) DEQ Division of Waste Management Underground Storage Tank (UST) Section Action Level (December 2013).Samples were collected by H&H during Phase II Environmental Site Assessment activities in August 2021 and during Brownfields asssessment activities in February 2022.Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Residential PSRG or UST Action Level. VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; TPH = total petroleum hydrocarbons; DRO = diesel range organics NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NE = no established standard; BDL = below laboratory method detection limits; OWS = oil/water separatorJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. Screening Criteria Former In-Ground Hydraulic Lifts8-108/3/2021mg/kgResidential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Action Level (2)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Assessment/tables/draft Data Tables (combined).xlsx3/17/2022Table 1A (Page 1 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1ASummary of Organic Constituent Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDHL-15 HL-16 HL-17 HL-18 HL-19 HL-20 HL-21 HL-22 HL-24Depth (ft bgs)Sample Date8/4/2021UnitsTPH (8015C)DRO (C10-C28)<3.7 <3.72,780 338<4.1413<4.2107 874 896<4.7-- --100PCBs (8082A)ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL-- ----VOCs (8260D)AcetoneNA NA <0.035 <0.051 NA <0.057 NA <0.0440.18 0.20NA14,000 210,000--2-Butanone (MEK)NA NA <0.026 <0.038 NA <0.042 NA <0.0330.13 0.15NA5,500 40,000--n-ButylbenzeneNA NA0.49<0.0037 NA0.0056 JNA <0.0027 <0.0029 <0.0027 NA780 12,000--sec-ButylbenzeneNA NA0.32 0.0052 JNA <0.0039 NA <0.0030 <0.0027 <0.0025 NA1,600 23,000--ChloroformNA NA <0.0033 <0.0048 NA <0.0054 NA0.0056 J<0.0037 <0.0034 NA0.340 1.5--1,1-DichloroethaneNA NA <0.0023 <0.0033 NA <0.0036 NA <0.0028 <0.0025 <0.0023 NA3.8 17--cis-1,2-DichloretheneNA NA0.0077 0.046NA <0.0030 NA0.0081<0.0021 <0.0019 NA31 470--EthylbenzeneNA NA0.032<0.0037 NA0.036NA <0.0032 <0.0028 <0.0026 NA627--Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)NA NA0.063<0.0027 NA <0.0030 NA <0.0023 <0.0021 <0.0019 NA410 2,100--p-IsopropyltolueneNA NA0.60<0.0039 NA <0.0043 NA <0.0033 <0.0030 <0.0028 NANE NE--Methylene ChlorideNA NA <0.015 <0.022 NA <0.024 NA <0.019 <0.17 <0.015 NA58 650--Methyl-tert-butyl etherNA NA <0.0021 <0.0030 NA <0.0033 NA <0.0025 <0.0023 <0.0021 NA49 220--NaphthaleneNA NA0.11<0.0042 NA0.55NA0.015<0.00320.0055 JNA2.1 8.8--n-PropylbenzeneNA NA0.19<0.0028 NA <0.0031 NA <0.0024 <0.0022 <0.0020 NA780.0 5,100.0--TetrachloroetheneNA NA0.014<0.0025 NA0.93NA0.018 0.085 0.082NA17 82--TolueneNA NA0.012 0.0082NA0.026NA0.012 0.0050 J 0.0043 JNA990 9,700--TrichloroetheneNA NA <0.0014 <0.0020 NA0.041NA <0.0018 <0.0016 <0.0015 NA0.87 4--1,2,4-TrimethylbenzeneNA NA1.2<0.0022 NA0.73NA0.022 0.025 0.024NA63 430--1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneNA NA0.51<0.0027 NA <0.0030 NA <0.00230.012<0.0019 NA56 320--m&p-XyleneNA NA <0.0038 <0.0054 NA0.14NA <0.00470.0062 J 0.0062 JNA120 140--o-XyleneNA NA0.014<0.0035 NA0.083NA0.0061 J 0.0032 J<0.0025 NA140 590--Xylene (Total)NA NA0.014<0.0045 NA0.22NA0.0061 J 0.0094 J 0.0062 JNA120 530--SVOCs (8270E)Di-n-butylphthalateNA NA0.35 J 0.33 JNA0.42 JNA <0.130.37 J<0.13 NA1,300 16,000--bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalateNA NA0.27 J<0.18 NA <0.19 NA <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 NA39 160--1-MethylnaphthaleneNA NA0.18 J<0.16 NA <0.17 NA <0.14 <0.13 <0.13 NA18 73--2-MethylnaphthaleneNA NA0.25 J<0.18 NA <0.19 NA <0.16 <0.15 <0.15 NA48 600--PhenanthreneNA NA0.14 J<0.15 NA <0.16 NA <0.13 <0.13 <0.12 NANE NE--Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2022. 2) DEQ Division of Waste Management Underground Storage Tank (UST) Section Action Level (December 2013).Samples were collected by H&H during Phase II Environmental Site Assessment activities in August 2021 and during Brownfields asssessment activities in February 2022.Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Residential PSRG or UST Action Level. VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; TPH = total petroleum hydrocarbons; DRO = diesel range organics NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NE = no established standard; BDL = below laboratory method detection limits; OWS = oil/water separatorJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. Action Level (2)Former In-Ground Hydraulic LiftsScreening Criteria 8-108/3/2021mg/kgHL-23 / SB-DUP-1Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Assessment/tables/draft Data Tables (combined).xlsx3/17/2022Table 1A (Page 2 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1ASummary of Organic Constituent Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSuspect UST Floor Drain Former USTOWSSample IDSB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-5 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8Depth (ft bgs)8-10 2-4 8-10 2-4 2-4 2-4 8-10Sample Date8/2/2021 8/3/2021 8/2/2021 8/3/2021 8/2/2021 8/2/2021 8/2/2021 Range MeanUnitsTPH (8015C)DRO (C10-C28)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA-- -- -- --100PCBs (8082A)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA-- -- -- ----VOCs (8260D)Acetone<0.0342 <0.0400 <0.0367 <0.0353 <0.030 <0.02830.0793 J<0.0347 <0.0340.005 J 0.004 J14,000 210,000 -- ----2-Butanone (MEK)<0.026 <0.030 <0.027 <0.026 <0.022 <0.021 <0.032 <0.026 <0.025 <0.0008 <0.00085,500 40,000 -- ----n-Butylbenzene<0.0025 <0.0029 <0.0027 <0.0026 <0.0022 <0.0021 <0.0032 <0.0026 <0.0025 <0.0006 <0.0006780 12,000 -- ----sec-Butylbenzene<0.0023 <0.0027 <0.0025 <0.0024 <0.0021 <0.0019 <0.0030 <0.0024 <0.0023 <0.0007 <0.00071,600 23,000 -- ----Chloroform<0.0032 <0.0038 <0.0035 <0.0033 <0.0028 <0.0027 <0.0041 <0.0033 <0.0032 <0.001 <0.0010.340 1.5 -- ----1,1-Dichloroethane<0.0022 <0.0026 <0.0024 <0.0023 <0.0019 <0.0018 <0.0028 <0.0022 <0.0022 <0.001 <0.0013.8 17 -- ----cis-1,2-Dichlorethene<0.0008 <0.0021 <0.0020 <0.0019 <0.0016 <0.00150.0141<0.0018 <0.0018 <0.0010 <0.001031 470 -- ----Ethylbenzene<0.0025 <0.0029 <0.0027 <0.0026 <0.0022 <0.0021 <0.0031 <0.0025 <0.0025 <0.0007 <0.0007627------Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)<0.0018 <0.0021 <0.0019 <0.0019 <0.0016 <0.0015 <0.0023 <0.0018 <0.0018 <0.0006 <0.0006410 2,100 -- ----p-Isopropyltoluene<0.0026 <0.0031 <0.0028 <0.0027 <0.0023 <0.0022 <0.0033 <0.00270.0167<0.001 <0.001NE NE -- ----Methylene Chloride<0.0146 <0.0171 <0.0157 <0.0151 <0.0128 <0.01210.0748 0.0596 0.0596<0.001 <0.00158 650 -- ----Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.002.0 <0.0023 <0.0021 <0.0021 <0.0017 <0.0016 <0.0025 <0.00200.0032 J<0.0008 <0.000849 220 -- ----Naphthalene<0.0028 <0.0033 <0.0030 <0.0029 <0.0025 <0.00230.0158<0.0028 <0.0028 <0.001 <0.0012.1 8.8 -- ----n-Propylbenzene<0.0019 <0.0022 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0017 <0.0016 <0.0024 <0.0019 <0.0019 <0.0007 <0.0007780.0 5,100.0 -- ----Tetrachloroethene<0.00170.0183<0.0018 <0.0017 <0.0015 <0.00140.114 0.473<0.0017 <0.001 <0.00117 82 -- ----Toluene<0.0015 <0.0018 <0.0016 <0.0016 <0.0013 <0.00130.0209<0.0015 <0.0015 <0.0008 <0.0008990 9,700 -- ----Trichloroethene<0.00140.0075<0.0015 <0.0014 <0.0012 <0.00110.0116 0.0058<0.0014 <0.001 <0.0010.87 4 -- ----1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene<0.0015 <0.0017 <0.0016 <0.0015 <0.0013 <0.00120.084.9<0.0015 <0.0014 <0.0006 <0.000663 430 -- ----1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.0018 <0.0021 <0.0019 <0.0018 <0.0016 <0.00150.0494<0.0018 <0.0018 <0.0007 <0.000756 320 -- ----m&p-Xylene<0.0036 <0.0043 <0.0039 <0.0038 <0.0032 <0.00300.121<0.0037 <0.0036 <0.001 <0.001120 140 -- ----o-Xylene<0.0024 <0.0028 <0.0025 <0.0024 <0.0021 <0.0019 <0.0030 <0.0024 <0.0023 <0.0006 <0.0006140 590 -- ----Xylene (Total)<0.0015 <0.0035 <0.0039 <0.0031 <0.0027 <0.00250.121<0.0031 <0.0030 <0.0006 <0.0006120 530 -- ----SVOCs (8270E)Di-n-butylphthalate<0.14 <0.13 <0.14 <0.13 <0.13 <0.12 <0.13 <0.67 <0.13 <0.134 <0.1351,300 16,000-- ----bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate<0.17 <0.15 <0.16 <0.15 <0.15 <0.14 <0.15 <0.78 <0.15 <0.150 <0.15139 160-- ----1-Methylnaphthalene<0.15 <0.14 <0.14 <0.14 <0.13 <0.13 <0.14 <0.70 <0.13 <0.132 <0.13418 73-- ----2-Methylnaphthalene<0.17 <0.15 <0.16 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.16 <0.80 <0.15 <0.125 <0.12648 600-- ----Phenanthrene<0.14 <0.13 <0.13 <0.13 <0.12 <0.12 <0.13 <0.65 <0.12 <0.260 <0.263NE NE-- ----Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2022. 2) DEQ Division of Waste Management Underground Storage Tank (UST) Section Action Level (December 2013).Samples were collected by H&H during Phase II Environmental Site Assessment activities in August 2021 and during Brownfields asssessment activities in February 2022.Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Residential PSRG or UST Action Level. VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; TPH = total petroleum hydrocarbons; DRO = diesel range organics NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NE = no established standard; BDL = below laboratory method detection limits; OWS = oil/water separatorJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. mg/kgSB-9 / SB-DUP6-72/17/2022SB-4 / SB-DUP-22-48/3/2021Northern Exterior Wall of Building 3Screening Criteria Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Background Metals (2)Action Level (2)Former Wash-Bay Floor Drains Trench Drain - Building 4https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Assessment/tables/draft Data Tables (combined).xlsx3/17/2022Table 1A (Page 3 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1BSummary of Metals Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDHL-1 HL-2 HL-3 HL-4 HL-5 HL-6 HL-7 HL-8 HL-9 HL-10 HL-11 HL-12 HL-13 HL-14Depth (ft bgs)Sample DateRange MeanUnitsMetals (6020B/7471B/7199)ArsenicNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.836 JNA NA NA NA0.68 3.01.0 - 18 4.8BariumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA22.2NA NA NA NA3,100 47,00050-1,000 356CadmiumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0958 NA NA NA NA14 2001.0 - 10 4.3Chromium (Total)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA7.31NA NA NA NA -- --7.0 - 300 65Hexavalent ChromiumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.286 NA NA NA NA0.31 6.5NS NSTrivalent ChromiumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA7.31NA NA NA NA23,000 350,000NS NSLeadNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA4.61NA NA NA NA400 800ND - 50 16MercuryNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0202 NA NA NA NA4.7 700.03 - 0.52 0.121SeleniumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.350 JNA NA NA NA78 1,200<0.1 - 0.8 0.42SilverNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0969 NA NA NA NA78 1,200ND - 5.0 NSNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2022. 2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Drugan and Chekiri, 2005. Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils. 3) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management Underground Storage Tank (UST) Section Action Level (December 2013).Samples were collected by H&H during Phase II Environmental Site Assessment activities in August 2021 and during Brownfields asssessment activities in February 2022.Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Residential PSRG and background concentrations. NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NS = not specified; ND = not detected; OWS = oil/water separator; UST - underground storage tankJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. mg/kg8/3/20218-10Former In-Ground Hydraulic LiftsResidential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Background Metals (2)Screening Criteria https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Assessment/tables/draft Data Tables (combined).xlsx3/17/2022Table 1B (Page 1 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1BSummary of Metals Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSample IDHL-15 HL-16 HL-17 HL-18 HL-19 HL-20 HL-21 HL-22 HL-24Depth (ft bgs)Sample Date8/4/2021 Range MeanUnitsMetals (6020B/7471B/7199)ArsenicNA NA1.42 2.77NA2.28NA1.89 0.621 J 1.02 JNA0.68 3.01.0 - 18 4.8BariumNA NA43.1 94.1NA84.0NA114 16.4 27.9NA3,100 47,00050-1,000 356CadmiumNA NA <0.0997 <0.107 NA0.146 JNA <0.111 <0.0966 <0.0969 NA14 2001.0 - 10 4.3Chromium (Total)NA NA15.5 40.8NA47.8NA34.3 27.1 19.2NA -- --7.0 - 300 65Hexavalent ChromiumNA NA <0.2970.487 JNA <0.366 NA <0.3320.603 J<0.289 NA0.31 6.5NS NSTrivalent ChromiumNA NA15.5 40.31NA47.8NA34.3 26.49 19.2NA23,000 350,000NS NSLeadNA NA8.98 7.09NA11.4NA7.66 9.10 7.53NA400 800ND - 50 16MercuryNA NA <0.0210 <0.0224 NA <0.0259 NA <0.0234 <0.02030.0420 JNA4.7 700.03 - 0.52 0.121SeleniumNA NA0.580 J 2.98 JNA1.02 JNA1.33 J<0.2030.668 JNA78 1,200<0.1 - 0.8 0.42SilverNA NA <0.101 <0.108 NA <0.124 NA <0.113 <0.0977 <0.0980 NA78 1,200ND - 5.0 NSNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2022. 2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Drugan and Chekiri, 2005. Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils. 3) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management Underground Storage Tank (UST) Section Action Level (December 2013).Samples were collected by H&H during Phase II Environmental Site Assessment activities in August 2021 and during Brownfield sssessment activities in February 2022.Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Residential PSRG and background concentrations. NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NS = not specified; ND = not detected; OWS = oil/water separator; UST - underground storage tankJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. mg/kgHL-23 / SB-DUP-1Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Background Metals (2)8-108/3/2021Screening Criteria Former In-Ground Hydraulic Liftshttps://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Assessment/tables/draft Data Tables (combined).xlsx3/17/2022Table 1B (Page 2 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1BSummary of Metals Soil Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002LocationSuspected USTFloor Drain Former USTOWSSample IDSB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-5 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8 BG-1 BG-2 BG-3Depth (ft bgs)8-10 2-4 8-10 2-4 2-4 2-4 8-10Sample Date8/2/2021 8/3/2021 8/2/2021 8/3/2021 8/2/2021 8/2/2021 8/2/2021Range MeanUnitsMetals by 6020B/7471B/7199Arsenic0.567 B,J 0.536 B,J 0.210 B,J 0.324 B,J 0.403 B,J,ML 0.454 B,J 0.541 B,J 0.456 B,J 0.932 B,J 1.86 1.75 0.910 B,J 0.813 B,J 0.750 B,J 0.68 3.01.0 - 18 4.8Barium301 55.2 11.8 10.1 10.8 5.82 149 142 38.0 19.4 18.4 81.6 123 59.7 3,100 47,00050-1,000 356Cadmium<0.122 <0.104 <0.103 <0.0990 <0.0997 <0.0975 <0.104 <0.102 <0.101 <0.0828 <0.0835 <0.09710.107 J<0.092214 2001.0 - 10 4.3Chromium (Total)28.6 17.5 2.45 J 9.44 19.3 14.8 14.7 16.9 12.9 70.1 75.3 21.2 11.5 0.989 J-- --7.0 - 300 65Hexavalent Chromium0.736 J 0.875 J<0.3070.865 J 1.34 1.35 0.715 J 0.882 J<0.3020.62 0.91<0.290 <0.282 <0.2750.31 6.5NS NSTrivalent Chromium27.86 16.63 2.45 J 8.58 17.96 13.15 13.99 16.02 12.9 69.5 74.4 21.2 11.5 0.989 J 23,000 350,000NS NSLead4.87 5.99 2.90 B 4.39 6.12 5.51 1.99 B,J 3.00 B 5.32 12.0 12.8 12.6 11.5 7.38 400 800ND - 50 16Mercury<0.0257 <0.0219 <0.0482 <0.0463 <0.0210 ML,R1 <0.0456 <0.0219 <0.02150.0260 J<0.0151 <0.01520.0226 J<0.0199 <0.01944.7 700.03 - 0.52 0.121Selenium0.305 J<0.219 <0.217 <0.208 <0.210 <0.205 <0.219 <0.2150.242 J<0.929 <0.9370.543 J 0.379 J 0.408 J 78 1,200<0.1 - 0.8 0.42Silver<0.123 <0.609 <0.104 <0.100 <0.101 <0.0986 <0.105 <0.103 <0.102 <0.0589 <0.0594 <0.0982 <0.0958 <0.093378 1,200ND - 5.0 NSNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated January 2022. 2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Drugan and Chekiri, 2005. Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils. 3) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management Underground Storage Tank (UST) Section Action Level (December 2013).Samples were collected by H&H during Phase II Environmental Site Assessment activities in August 2021 and during Brownfield sssessment activities in February 2022.Hydraulic lift samples were submitted for VOCs, SVOCs, and metals analysis for only those samples with TPH-DRO at concentrations above the DEQ UST Section Action Limit. Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses. Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Bold values indicate compound exceeds the Residential PSRG and background concentrations. NA = not analyzed; -- = not applicable; NS = not specified; ND = not detected; OWS = oil/water separator; UST - underground storage tankJ = Compound was detected at a concentration above the laboratory method detection limits, but below the laboratory reporting limits resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration. mg/kgFormer Wash-Bay Floor Drains Trench Drain - Building 4 Background8/2/2021SB-4 / SB-DUP-2Northern Exterior Wall of Building 3Residential PSRGs (1)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)Background Metals (2)2-40-28/3/2021SB-9 / SB-DUP6-72/17/2022Screening Criteria https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles‐1/Shared Documents/AAA‐Master Projects/Ardent ‐ ACO/ACO.002 ‐ 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Assessment/tables/draft Data Tables (combined).xlsx3/17/2022Table 1B (Page 3 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2Summary of Soil Gas Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002Evaluation AreaSample IDSG-1 SG-2 SG-3 SG-4 SG-5 SG-6 SG-7 SG-8Sample DateSample TypeUnitsVOCs (TO-15)1,1,1−Trichloroethane<0.39 <0.38 <0.39 <0.47 <0.41 <0.59 <196 <0.4735,000 440,0001,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane<0.78 <0.75 <0.78 <0.94 <0.81 <1.2 <391 <0.941.6 211,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane0.64 J 0.91 J 1.3 J 1.1 J 11.9<0.91 <304 <0.7335,000 440,0001,1-Dichloroethane<0.35 <0.33 <0.35 <0.42 <0.36 <0.52 <173 <0.42587701,2,4-Trimethylbenzene0.97 J 10.5 1.6 J 1.6 J 2.9 3.62,1508.4 420 5,3001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.613.0 0.78 J<0.730.89 J 2.1 J1,8105.0 420 5,3001,3-Butadiene<0.25 <0.24 <0.25 <0.30 <0.26 <0.38 <126 <0.303.1 411,3-Dichlorobenzene11.8 6.6 7.9 5.6 J 16.5 12.1<535 <1.3NE NE1,4-Dichlorobenzene<1.8 <1.8 <1.8 <2.2 <1.9 <2.8 <922 <2.28.5 1101,4-Dioxane NANANANANANANANA19 2502-Butanone (MEK)8.1 19.0 24.9 23.4 15.1 25.3<48964.0 35,000 440,0002-Hexanone<0.931.5 J<0.932.3 J 2.8 J 3.4 J<46517.2 210 2,6002-Propanol (Isopropanol)1.9 J<1.01.8 J<1.336.5 6.0 J<535 <1.31,400 18,0004-Ethyltoluene<0.994.6 J 3.2 J<1.2 <1.0 <1.51,390 J 1.8 J NE NE4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)3.5 J 3.0 J 2.4 J 2.5 J 3.4 J 4.1 J<3376.9 J 21,000 260,000Acetone37.5 26.6 51.3 34.6 89.5 133<1,900552 NE NEBenzene0.79 J 1.619.14.6 2.8 10.3<12019.412 160Bromodichloromethane<0.505.30.65 J 0.87 J 0.78 J<0.75 <249 <0.602.5 33Bromomethane<0.320.61 J<0.32 <0.38 <0.33 <0.47 <1580.48 J 35 440Carbon disulfide68.4 42.3 101 29.7 52.3 113<136217 4,900 61,000Carbon tetrachloride<0.59 <0.57 <0.59 <0.71 <0.61 <0.88 <294 <0.7116 200Chlorobenzene<0.33 <0.31 <0.33 <0.39 <0.34 <0.49 <163 <0.39350 4,400Chloroethane<0.470.93 J 1.8 0.58 J<0.49 <0.71 <235 <0.5628,000 350,000Chloroform1.4 J87.612019.2 35.6<0.58 <1920.92 J 4.1 53Chloromethane<0.18 <0.17 <0.183.7 0.73 J 2.0<89.5 <0.21630 7,900cis-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.41 <0.39 <0.41 <0.49 <0.43 <0.62 <205 <0.49NE NECyclohexane1.1 J 2.9 J 52.2 2.5 J 1.4 J 8.7 27,800 63.5 42,000 530,000Dibromochloromethane<1.1 <1.0 <1.1 <1.3 <1.1 <1.6 <541 <1.3NE NEDichlorodifluoromethane2.5 3.3 2.3 2.7 63.1 2.1 J<198 <0.47700 8,800Ethanol18.4 7.6 29.5 2.7 J 38.7 46.4<62266.8 NE NEEthyl acetate1.5 J<0.260.67 J<0.33 <0.29 <0.41 <1381.3 J 490 6,100Ethylbenzene<0.6512.6 4.3 3.2 5.8 2.2 J2,0904.3 37 490Methylene Chloride<1.2 <1.210.4 2.3 J<1.3 <1.9 <623 <1.53,400 53,000Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.26 <0.25 <0.26 <0.32 <0.28 <0.40 <132651360 4,700Naphthalene<4.6 <4.4 <4.6 <5.5 <4.8 <6.9 <2,280 <5.52.8 36n-Heptane1.6 J 4.4 33.8<0.465.7 7.325,10027.4 2,800 35,000n-Hexane2.4 16.9 84.0 7.7 8.3 18.114,80074.1 4,900 61,000m&p-Xylene2.0 J 41.6 6.0 11.5 19.6 6.45,79015.4 700 8,800o-Xylene0.62 J 20.6 3.5 3.6 5.6 2.7 J4,5006.3 700 8,800Propylene7.3 46.9 787 47.7 21.9 275 1,070<0.3321,000 260,000Styrene<0.81 <0.781.4 J<0.97 <0.84 <1.2 <405 <0.977,000 88,000Tetrachloroethene33.1 23.7 1.7 20.5 2.6 2.1 J1,74016.3 280 3,500Tetrahydrofuran<0.38 <0.36 <0.38 <0.454.3<0.57 <189 <0.4514,000 180,000Toluene8.0 32.8 20.1 25.8 48.2 10.3 3,080 31.9 35,000 440,000trans-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.35 <0.34 <0.35 <0.42 <0.37 <0.53 <177 <0.42280 3,500Trichloroethene<0.41 <0.40 <0.410.58 J<0.43 <0.62 <206 <0.4914 180Trichlorofluoromethane1.3 J 1.2 J 0.96 J 1.2 J 2.5 J 1.6 J<2452.6 J NE NEVinyl chloride<0.18 <0.182.0<0.22 <0.19 <0.27 <91.2 <0.225.6 280Xylene (Total)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 700 8,800Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated January 2022.Samples were collected by H&H during Phase II Environmental Site Assessment activities in August 2021 and during Brownfields assessment activities in February 2022.Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).Laboratory analytical method is shown in parentheses.Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values exceed the Residential SGSL.Underlined values exceed the Non-Residential SGSL.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; NE = not established; NA = not analyzed Note that due to dilution factor for sample SG-7, MDLs are above the DEQ DWM SGSLs for select compounds. J = Compound concentration was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.B = Compound was detected in the laboratory method blank.Screening Criteria Proposed Residential Building 8/5/2021Residential SGSLs (1)Non-Residential SGSLs (1)Exterior Soil Gasµg/m3µg/m3https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Ardent - ACO/ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Assessment/tables/draft Data Tables (combined).xlsxTable 2 (Page 1 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2Summary of Soil Gas Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002Evaluation AreaSample IDSG-10 SG-11 SG-12 SG-13 SG-14 SG-15Sample DateSample TypeUnitsVOCs (TO-15)1,1,1−Trichloroethane<0.38 <0.38 <0.36 <0.38 <0.38 <0.45 <0.49 <0.3335,000 440,0001,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane<0.75 <0.75 <0.72 <0.75 <0.771.7 J<0.99 <0.671.6 211,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane0.70 J 0.66 J 0.74 J<0.58 <0.602.9 J<0.770.93 J 35,000 440,0001,1-Dichloroethane<0.33 <0.33 <0.32 <0.33 <0.340.46 J<0.44 <0.30587701,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1.7 J 1.6 J 0.74 J 1.1 J 10.7 12.0 12.8 7.3 420 5,3001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene0.65 J<0.59 <0.56 <0.594.8 5.4 3.0 2.2 420 5,3001,3-Butadiene<0.24 <0.24 <0.23 <0.24 <0.25 <0.29 <0.32 <0.223.1 411,3-Dichlorobenzene<1.0 <1.09.3<1.0 <1.013.4<1.42.7 J NE NE1,4-Dichlorobenzene<1.8 <1.8 <1.7 <1.8 <1.8 <2.1 <2.3 <1.68.5 1101,4-Dioxane NANANANANANANANA19 2502-Butanone (MEK)8.8 6.0 J 4.3 J 13.0 7.7 11.2 43.9 19.6 35,000 440,0002-Hexanone3.1 J 3.2 J 1.4 J 4.2 J<0.919.9 J<1.21.7 J 210 2,6002-Propanol (Isopropanol)3.5 J 5.6 10.1 4.6 J<1.031.7 158 94.6 1,400 18,0004-Ethyltoluene<0.95 <0.95 <0.92 <0.951.7 J 2.5 J 5.2 J 1.6 J NE NE4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)1.7 J 1.6 J 0.89 J 2.6 J 3.3 J 4.9 J 8.3 J 6.9 J 21,000 260,000Acetone36.9 33.1 23.3 102 354 66.6 285 103 NE NEBenzene2.6 2.5 0.6918.1 19.210.724.72.0 12 160Bromodichloromethane1.5 J 1.5 J3.8<0.48 <0.49 <0.57 <0.6381.82.5 33Bromomethane1.1 J 0.36 J<0.290.98 J 1.9<0.362.9 0.49 J 35 440Carbon disulfide31.6 31.9 7.6 196 6.4 39.8 211 9.8 4,900 61,000Carbon tetrachloride<0.57 <0.57 <0.54 <0.57 <0.58 <0.67 <0.74 <0.5016 200Chlorobenzene<0.31 <0.310.91 J<0.31 <0.32 <0.37 <0.410.93 J 350 4,400Chloroethane<0.45 <0.45 <0.43 <0.45 <0.46 <0.545.3 0.90 J 28,000 350,000Chloroform24.7 24.0 13.0 4.7<0.38 <0.4473.47164.1 53Chloromethane2.3<0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.183.9<0.23 <0.15630 7,900cis-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.39 <0.39 <0.38 <0.39 <0.40 <0.47 <0.52 <0.35NE NECyclohexane1.9 J 1.8 J 16.4 15.0 218 52.4 20.4 12.4 42,000 530,000Dibromochloromethane<1.0 <1.03.3 J<1.0 <1.1 <1.2 <1.431.8 NE NEDichlorodifluoromethane2.6 2.8 2.2<0.38 <0.392.8 2.0 J 2.3 700 8,800Ethanol10.2 8.0 J 118 10.2 13.0 82.6 760 421 NE NEEthyl acetate<0.26 <0.261.3 J<0.26 <0.2717.0 4.7 7.2 490 6,100Ethylbenzene2.9 2.8 0.80 J 1.3 J 1.6 J 28.9 36.4 5.5 37 490Methylene Chloride<1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 <1.23.8 J 13.3 22.1 3,400 53,000Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.25 <0.25 <0.24 <0.25 <0.26 <0.30 <0.34 <0.23360 4,700Naphthalene<4.4 <4.4 <4.2 <4.45.8<5.26.0 J 8.62.8 36n-Heptane3.0 2.8 1.8 20.4 9.1 8.9 21.9 4.8 2,800 35,000n-Hexane6.7 5.9 3.1 J 34.8 4.3 16.3 28.4 6.1 4,900 61,000m&p-Xylene9.2 8.8 2.7 J 3.5 J 8.9 11.3 20.8 15.6 700 8,800o-Xylene3.1 3.0 0.94 J 1.5 J 9.3 5.5 31.4 6.4 700 8,800Propylene59.7 50.8<0.25 <0.26 <0.27 <0.31434 18.5 21,000 260,000Styrene<0.78 <0.78 <0.75 <0.78 <0.79 <0.92 <1.00.72 J 7,000 88,000Tetrachloroethene<0.59 <0.592.2<0.591.6 1.9 12.0 2.1 280 3,500Tetrahydrofuran<0.36 <0.36 <0.35 <0.36 <0.37 <0.43 <0.48 <0.3214,000 180,000Toluene17.2 16.5 11.8 6.7 6.3 50.6 59.4 197 35,000 440,000trans-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.34 <0.34 <0.33 <0.34 <0.35 <0.40 <0.45 <0.30280 3,500Trichloroethene<0.40 <0.40 <0.38 <0.40 <0.40 <0.471.0 J 0.79 J 14 180Trichlorofluoromethane1.5 J 1.5 J 1.5 J<0.47 <0.481.5 J 1.6 J 1.4 J NE NEVinyl chloride<0.18 <0.18 <0.17 <0.18 <0.18 <0.21 <0.23 <0.165.6 280Xylene (Total)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 700 8,800Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated January 2022.Samples were collected by H&H during Phase II Environmental Site Assessment activities in August 2021 and during Brownfields assessment activities in February 2022.Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).Laboratory analytical method is shown in parentheses.Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values exceed the Residential SGSL.Underlined values exceed the Non-Residential SGSL.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; NE = not established; NA = not analyzed Note that due to dilution factor for sample SG-7, MDLs are above the DEQ DWM SGSLs for select compounds. J = Compound concentration was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.B = Compound was detected in the laboratory method blank.Screening Criteria Proposed Residential Building 8/5/2021Non-Residential SGSLs (1)Residential SGSLs (1)SG-9 / SG-DUPExterior Soil Gasµg/m3µg/m3https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Ardent - ACO/ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Assessment/tables/draft Data Tables (combined).xlsxTable 2 (Page 2 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2Summary of Soil Gas Analytical DataHarrelson FordCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ACO-002Evaluation AreaBuilding 2ExteriorSample IDSSV-1 SSV-3 SSV-4 SSV-5 SSV-6 SG-16Sample Date2/17/20222/17/2022 2/16/2022 2/17/2022Sample TypeSoil GasUnitsVOCs (TO-15)1,1,1−Trichloroethane<0.1441.86 J 1.84 J<0.144 <0.144 <2.88 <0.144 <0.14435,000 440,0001,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane<0.104 <0.104 <0.104 <0.104 <0.104 <2.08 <0.104 <0.1042211,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane<0.561 <0.561 <0.561 <0.561 <0.561 <11.2 <0.5611.12 J35,000 440,0001,1-Dichloroethane<0.101 <0.101 <0.101 <0.101 <0.101 <2.02 <0.101 <0.10158 7701,2,4-Trimethylbenzene2.81 1.22 J 1.33 J 4.42 1.68 J<2.202.91 5.67420 5,3001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene0.703 J<0.236 <0.2361.32 J 0.408 J<4.720.732 J 1.97 J420 5,3001,3-Butadiene<0.328 <0.328 <0.328 <0.328 <0.32822.1<0.328 <0.3283.1 411,3-Dichlorobenzene<0.174 <0.174 <0.174 <0.174 <0.174 <3.48 <0.174 <0.174NE NE1,4-Dichlorobenzene<0.186 <0.186 <0.186 <0.186 <0.186 <3.721.67 J<0.1868.5 1101,4-Dioxane 1.86 1.03 J 0.951 J 4.04<0.435 <8.69 <0.435 <0.43519 2502-Butanone (MEK)1.70 4.93 5.71 2.94 3.35 9.73 J 15.9 15.635,000 440,0002-Hexanone<0.2853.23 3.22 3.28 3.50<5.713.93<0.285210 2,6002-Propanol (Isopropanol)4.99 22.8 23.1 21.6 2.11 JB 7.67 J 61.2<0.1391,400 18,0004-Ethyltoluene0.555 J<0.128 <0.1280.777 J<0.12811.4 J 0.600 J 1.96 JNE NE4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)<0.1210.508 J<0.1211.18 J 1.01 J<2.424.48 3.5621,000 260,000Acetone30.1 38.9 42.6 33.5 33.1 24.4 J 398 72.5NE NEBenzene0.588 J 0.262 J 0.303 J 0.668 J 0.326 J35.90.393 J20.912 160Bromodichloromethane<0.150 <0.150 <0.150 <0.150 <0.150 <3.00 <0.150 <0.1502.5 33Bromomethane<0.115 <0.115 <0.115 <0.115 <0.115 <2.30 <0.115 <0.11535 440Carbon disulfide2.06 J 2.29 J 2.25 J 0.532 J 1.93 J 25.9 J 3.86 J 12.04,900 61,000Carbon tetrachloride<0.155 <0.155 <0.155 <0.155 <0.155 <3.10 <0.1551.26 J16 200Chlorobenzene<0.107 <0.107 <0.107 <0.107 <0.107 <2.14 <0.107 <0.107350 4400Chloroethane<0.164 <0.164 <0.164 <0.164 <0.16412.1 J<0.164 <0.16428,000 350,000Chloroform12.1<0.0864 <0.0864 <0.0864 <0.0864 <1.730.425 J<0.08644.1 53Chloromethane<0.0673 <0.0673 <0.0673 <0.0673 <0.0673 <1.34 <0.06730.977 J630 7,900cis-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.0955 <0.0955 <0.0955 <0.0955 <0.095513,500 1.13 J<0.0955NE NECyclohexane5.42<0.1614.69 6.91 6.81 72.0 8.80 21.142,000 530,000Dibromochloromethane<0.208 <0.208 <0.208 <0.208 <0.208 <4.16 <0.208 <0.208NE NEDichlorodifluoromethane2.77 2.79 2.75 2.72 2.76<2.682.62 3.1670 8,800EthanolNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NEEthyl acetate<0.136 <0.136 <0.136 <0.136 <0.136 <2.72 <0.136 <0.136490 6,100Ethylbenzene1.18 J 0.395 J 0.399 J 2.09 J 0.577 J61.60.903 J 15.837 490Methylene Chloride0.841 J 0.750 J 0.750 J 0.604 J 0.986 J<9.750.938 J 2.173,400 53,000Methyl-tert-butyl ether<0.0336 <0.0336 <0.0336 <0.0336 <0.0336252<0.0336 <0.0336360 4,700Naphthalene2.81<0.183 <0.1832.75 2.70<3.66 <0.1832.912.8 36n-Heptane0.750 J<0.143 <0.1430.533 J<0.14323.8 J 1.14 J 26.12,800 35,000n-Hexane0.779 J<0.0472 <0.04721.10 J<0.047250.3<0.047257.04,900 61,000m&p-Xylene4.45 J 1.55 J 1.48 J 12.7 2.19 J 227 3.55 J 55.0700 8,800o-Xylene1.97 J 0.734 J 0.677 J 12.6 1.15 J 74.6 1.61 J 15.2700 8,800Propylene<0.242 <0.242 <0.24221.0<0.242393<0.24215221,000 260,000Styrene0.596 J 0.430 J 0.405 J 0.741 J 0.575 J<2.480.835 J 1.58 J7,000 88,000Tetrachloroethene523 6,6706,4401,0903.37 J 32.2 J6472.44 J280 3,500Tetrahydrofuran<0.107 <0.1070.779 J<0.1070.457 J<2.14 <0.1071.5714,000 180,000Toluene5.18 2.03 1.82 J 4.02 2.72 224 7.22 25935,000 440,000trans-1,2-Dichloroethene<0.108 <0.108 <0.108 <0.108 <0.108132<0.108 <0.108280 3,500Trichloroethene<0.1991.54 J 1.50 J<0.199 <0.199 <3.9826.9<0.19914 180Trichlorofluoromethane1.65 J 1.12 J 1.11 J 1.32 J 1.43 J<2.601.33 J 2.57 JNE NEVinyl chloride<0.127 <0.127 <0.127 <0.127 <0.12711,700<0.127 <0.1275.6 280Xylene (Total) 6.42 J 2.28 J 2.16 J 25.3 3.34 J 302 5.16 J 70.2700 8,800Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated January 2022.Samples were collected by H&H during Phase II Environmental Site Assessment activities in August 2021 and during Brownfields assessment activities in February 2022.Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).Laboratory analytical method is shown in parentheses.Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits (MDLs).Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.Bold values exceed the Residential SGSL.Underlined values exceed the Non-Residential SGSL.VOCs = volatile organic compounds; NE = not established; NA = not analyzed Note that due to dilution factor for sample SG-7, MDLs are above the DEQ DWM SGSLs for select compounds. J = Compound concentration was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.B = Compound was detected in the laboratory method blank.Sub-Slab Soil GasScreening Criteria Residential SGSLs (1)Non-Residential SGSLs (1)Building 3SSV-2/SSV-DUPµg/m32/16/2022Building 4https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Ardent - ACO/ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard/Brownfields/Assessment/tables/draft Data Tables (combined).xlsxTable 2 (Page 3 of 3)Hart & Hickman, PC

Figures
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP ElevationProgram, Geographic Names Information System, National HydrographyDataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset,and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S.Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data;U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAANational Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal ReliefModel. Data refreshed May, 2020.
SITE LOCATION MAP
HARRELSON FORD6500 SOUTH BOULEVARDCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: 6-23-21
JOB NO: ACO-002
REVISION NO: 0
FIGURE. 1
2923 South Tryon Street - Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (f)License # C-1269 / # C-245 Geology
TITLE
PROJECT
0 2,000 4,000
SCALE IN FEET
Path: S:\AAA-Master Projects\Ardent - ACO\ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard\Figures\Figure-1.mxdN
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
CHARLOTTE EAST, NORTH CAROLINA 2013CHARLOTTE WEST, NORTH CAROLINA 2013
QUADRANGLE7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
SITE
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. ACO-002
DATE: 2-1-22
FIGURE NO. 2
HARRELSON FORD
6500 SOUTH BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE MAP
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PARCEL BOUNDARY
RAILROAD
TRENCH DRAIN
RECTANGULAR FLOOR DRAIN
CIRCULAR FLOOR DRAIN
WASTE OIL AST
NEW OIL AST
FORMER UST
CONCRETE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
VENT PIPE
OUT-OF-USE IN-GROUND HYDRAULIC LIFT
OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
PARKING
NOTES:
1.PARCEL DATA OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG COUNTY
GIS, 2021.
2.AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS, 2021.OLD PINEVILLE ROADSOUTH BOULEVARDVICTORY CHRISTIAN CAMPUS
(7000 OLD PINEVILLE ROAD)
BANNER
(6424 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
ADAMS CAR SALES AND SERVICE
(6501 & 6511 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
FISHY FISH MARKET
(6531 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
AMERICAN AUTO SALES
(6535 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
LIFT AUTO AND SALES
(6543 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
SOUTH BOULEVARD CAR WASH CENTER
(6547 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
GOODWILL
(6607 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
LA PREFERIDA
(6625 SOUTH BOULEVARD)
PAVED PARKING
(NO ASSIGNED ADDRESS)
BUILDING #1 -
VACANT
WAREHOUSE
BUILDING #2 -
MULTI-TENANT
AUTO REPAIR
OFFICES/
STORAGE
OFFICES
BUILDING #4 -
MAINTENANCE BAYS
WITH ABOVEGROUND
HYDRAULIC LIFTS
BUILDING #3 -
MAINTENANCE BAYS WITH
OUT-OF-USE IN-GROUND
HYDRAULIC LIFTS
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Ardent - ACO\ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard\Brownfields\Assessment\Work Plan\Figures\Figures 20220201.dwg, FIG 2, 2/2/2022 12:22:03 PM, sperry
BG-3
BG-2
BG-1
SB-6 SB-7
SB-3
SB-5
SB-4
SB-2
SG-5
SG-1
SG-6
SG-11
SG-12SG-7
SG-2
SG-3
SG-8
SG-13
SG-14
SG-4
SG-9
SG-10
SG-15
TMW-1
TMW-5
TMW-3/SB-8
TMW-4/SB-1
TMW-2
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. ACO-002
DATE: 2-1-22
FIGURE NO. 3
HARRELSON FORD
6500 SOUTH BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PARCEL BOUNDARY
EXISTING BUILDING LOCATION
RAILROAD
2' ELEVATION CONTOURS (FT. MSL)
TRENCH DRAIN
RECTANGULAR FLOOR DRAIN
CIRCULAR FLOOR DRAIN
FORMER UST
VENT PIPE
OUT-OF-USE IN-GROUND HYDRAULIC LIFT
OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
PROPOSED TOWNHOME DEVELOPMENT
FORMER MONITORING WELL LOCATION
FORMER CO-LOCATED SOIL BORING AND
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL LOCATION
FORMER SOIL BORING LOCATION
FORMER BACKGROUND SOIL BORING
LOCATION
FORMER SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
SOIL BORING LOCATION
SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
SUB-SLAB SAMPLE LOCATION
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
PARKING
NOTES:
1.PARCEL DATA OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG COUNTY
GIS, 2021.
2.PRELIMINARY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PREPARED BY
LAND DESIGN.
3.ELEVATION CONTOURS OBTAINED FROM MECKLEBURG
COUNTY LIDAR, 2017.
4.FORMER SOIL, GROUNDWATER, AND SOIL GAS SAMPLES
COLLECTED BY H&H IN AUGUST 2021.
5.UST = UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
FT. MSL = FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVELOLD PINEVILLE ROADSOUTH BOULEVARDBUILDING 1
BUILDING 2
BUILDING 4
BUILDING 3
644
SB-9
SSV-1
SSV-2
SSV-3
SSV-4
SSV-5 SSV-6
SG-16
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Ardent - ACO\ACO.002 - 6500 South Boulevard\Brownfields\Assessment\Work Plan\Figures\Figures 20220201.dwg, FIG 3, 2/28/2022 8:27:21 AM, shaynes

Appendix A

Soil Gas Field Forms and Soil Boring Logs
&Žƌŵ^dͲϭ6XPPD&DQLVWHU6KXWLQ7HVW)LHOG)RUP3URMHFW1RBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 6DPSOHUBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB,QLWLDO3UHVVXUH3DVV"!+J7LPH&DQLVWHU3UHVVXUH3DVV"5HJXODWRU=HUR3UHVVXUH7LPH&DQLVWHU3UHVVXUH3DVV"PPGG\\ +J <HV1R KU +J <HV1R +J KU +J <HV1R6WDUW0LGGOH(QG6WDUW0LGGOH(QG6WDUW0LGGOH(QG6WDUW0LGGOH(QG6WDUW0LGGOH(QG6WDUW0LGGOH(QG& FDQLVWHU,'5 UHJXODWRU,'+J LQFKHVRIPHUFXU\/DVWXSGDWHG1RWHV^ŚƵƚͲ/ŶdĞƐƚƐŚŽƵůĚďĞƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚǁŝƚŚŵĂƚĐŚŝŶŐĐĂŶŝƐƚĞƌǁŝƚŚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌĂƐůŝƐƚĞĚďLJůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJŽŶĐĂŶŝƐƚĞƌƚĂŐ͕ĂŶĚƐŚŽƵůĚůĂƐƚĨŽƌĂĚƵƌĂƟŽŶŽĨĂƚůĞĂƐƚϱŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ͘ZĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌΗĞƌŽΗWƌĞƐƐƵƌĞсƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽĨƌĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌĚĞƚĂĐŚĞĚĨƌŽŵ^ƵŵŵĂ;ŝĨŶŽƚϬΗ,Ő͕ƚŚĞŶƚŚŝƐŶĞĞĚƐƚŽďĞĂĐĐŽƵŶƚĞĚĨŽƌĚƵƌŝŶŐƐĂŵƉůŝŶŐͿ͘^ƵŵŵĂ/ŶŝƚŝĂůWƌĞƐƐƵƌĞсƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽĨ^ƵŵŵĂŝŵŵĞĚŝĞƚĞůLJĂĨƚĞƌĐůŽƐŝŶŐǀĂůǀĞ;ƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞůŝŬĞůLJƚŽĚĞĐƌĞĂƐĞƐůŝŐŚůƚLJŽŶĐĞǀĂůǀĞŝƐĐůŽƐĞĚͿ͘6DPSOH,'7HVW3HLRG͗Z͗͗Z͗͗Z͗͗Z͗͗Z͗͗Z͗6KXWLQ5HWHVWLIQHHGHG6KXWLQ7HVW1RWHV6XPPD3UHVVXUH&KHFN'DWH͗ͰhƐĞƌƐͰŵǀĂǁƚĞƌͰƌŽƉďŽdžͰLJKƚŚĞƌͰ&ŽƌŵĚŝƚƐͰ/YͲ^^sͰsĂƉŽƌ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐ&ŽƌŵƐͺsϲ͘Ϭ^ƵďͲ^ůĂďͬ^Žŝů'ĂƐ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐ^ŚƵƚͲŝŶdĞƐƚ&ŝĞůĚ&Žƌŵ,ĂƌƚΘ,ŝĐŬŵĂŶ͕WACO-002 LES1430611362113782/14/22-301409 -301412 -301407 -30Y0Y2/14/221408 -29.5-29.5 Y1410 -29.5Y065551413 -292/15/225935131281157 -30-30 Y1159 -30Y01202 -29.5*replacement can for 5999*59822/17/22162201316 -30-30 Y1318 -29.75Y01321 -29.752/17/2205911162191344 -28-28 Y1346 -28Y1349 -28
&Žƌŵ^dͲϭ6XPPD&DQLVWHU6KXWLQ7HVW)LHOG)RUP3URMHFW1RBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 6DPSOHUBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB,QLWLDO3UHVVXUH3DVV"!+J7LPH&DQLVWHU3UHVVXUH3DVV"5HJXODWRU=HUR3UHVVXUH7LPH&DQLVWHU3UHVVXUH3DVV"PPGG\\ +J <HV1R KU +J <HV1R +J KU +J <HV1R6WDUW0LGGOH(QG6WDUW0LGGOH(QG6WDUW0LGGOH(QG6WDUW0LGGOH(QG6WDUW0LGGOH(QG6WDUW0LGGOH(QG& FDQLVWHU,'5 UHJXODWRU,'+J LQFKHVRIPHUFXU\/DVWXSGDWHG1RWHV^ŚƵƚͲ/ŶdĞƐƚƐŚŽƵůĚďĞƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚǁŝƚŚŵĂƚĐŚŝŶŐĐĂŶŝƐƚĞƌǁŝƚŚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌĂƐůŝƐƚĞĚďLJůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJŽŶĐĂŶŝƐƚĞƌƚĂŐ͕ĂŶĚƐŚŽƵůĚůĂƐƚĨŽƌĂĚƵƌĂƟŽŶŽĨĂƚůĞĂƐƚϱŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ͘ZĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌΗĞƌŽΗWƌĞƐƐƵƌĞсƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽĨƌĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌĚĞƚĂĐŚĞĚĨƌŽŵ^ƵŵŵĂ;ŝĨŶŽƚϬΗ,Ő͕ƚŚĞŶƚŚŝƐŶĞĞĚƐƚŽďĞĂĐĐŽƵŶƚĞĚĨŽƌĚƵƌŝŶŐƐĂŵƉůŝŶŐͿ͘^ƵŵŵĂ/ŶŝƚŝĂůWƌĞƐƐƵƌĞсƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞŽĨ^ƵŵŵĂŝŵŵĞĚŝĞƚĞůLJĂĨƚĞƌĐůŽƐŝŶŐǀĂůǀĞ;ƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞůŝŬĞůLJƚŽĚĞĐƌĞĂƐĞƐůŝŐŚůƚLJŽŶĐĞǀĂůǀĞŝƐĐůŽƐĞĚͿ͘6DPSOH,'7HVW3HLRG͗Z͗͗Z͗͗Z͗͗Z͗͗Z͗͗Z͗6KXWLQ5HWHVWLIQHHGHG6KXWLQ7HVW1RWHV6XPPD3UHVVXUH&KHFN'DWH͗ͰhƐĞƌƐͰŵǀĂǁƚĞƌͰƌŽƉďŽdžͰLJKƚŚĞƌͰ&ŽƌŵĚŝƚƐͰ/YͲ^^sͰsĂƉŽƌ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐ&ŽƌŵƐͺsϲ͘Ϭ^ƵďͲ^ůĂďͬ^Žŝů'ĂƐ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐ^ŚƵƚͲŝŶdĞƐƚ&ŝĞůĚ&Žƌŵ,ĂƌƚΘ,ŝĐŬŵĂŶ͕WACO-002 LES6553594159992/14/22-29.51346 -29.51349 -29.51344 -29.5Y0Y2/14/221347 -29.5 1354 -29.5-29.5 Y1349 -28.5N01356 -28.5131151352 -28 1359 -28N*got replacement can*2/14/226000143161358 -30-30 Y1400 -30Y01403 -30113652/14/22143161358 -30-30 Y1400 -30Y01403 -302/14/2205981143271400 -30-30 Y1402 -30Y1405 -302/14/22113551404 -30-30 Y1406 -29Y065691410 -29
&Žƌŵ^sͲϭ6XE6ODE6RLO*DV9DSRU,QVWDOODWLRQ)LHOG)RUP3URMHFW1RBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB6DPSOHUBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB:HDWKHUBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB6XUIDFH0DWHULDO6ODE7KLFNQHVVLIDSSO0DWHULDO%HORZ6ODELIDSSO'HSWKRI6FUHHQLIDSSO7\SH 'DWH 7LPH$PELHQW7HPS3XUJH0HWKRG9ROXPH3XUJHG6KURXG+HOLXP&RQF3XUJH+HOLXP&RQF/HDN7HVW3DVV"VHHQRWH666*3HUP7HPS&RQFUHWHVRLOJUDYHODVSKDOW,QFKHV*UDYHOVDQGFOD\HWFIWEJV)XOOVDPSOHWUDLQRUSRLQWRQO\PPGG\\KUR)6\ULQJHSXPS/LWHUVVHHQRWHVIRUFDOFRUSSPLQGLFDWHXQLWVEHORZ<HV1R^͗͗Z͗^͗͗Z͗^͗͗Z͗^͗͗Z͗^͗͗Z͗^͗͗Z͗6 VDPSOH,'& FDQLVWHU,'5 UHJXODWRU,'66 VXEVODE6* VRLOJDV3HUP SHUPDQHQW7HPS WHPSRUDU\9ROXPH3XUJHG [SXUJHYROXPHV 
/
D/DVWXSGDWHG+J LQFKHVRIPHUFXU\SSP SDUWVSHUPLOOLRQ1RWHVBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB6DPSOH,'7\SH9DSRU0RQLWRULQJ3RLQW&RQVWUXFWLRQ +HOLXP/HDN7HVWEŽƚĞ͗>ĞĂŬdĞƐƚZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐWĞƌEYtDsĂƉŽƌ/ŶƚƌƵƐŝŽŶ'ƵŝĚĂŶĐĞ͕ůĞĂŬƚĞƐƚƉĂƐƐĞƐŝĨŚĞůŝƵŵĐŽŶĐĞŶƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŝŶƉƵƌŐĞĂŝƌŝƐůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶϭϬйŽĨŚĞůŝƵŵĐŽŶĐĞŶƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŝŶƐŚƌŽƵĚ͘/ OHQJWKRIWXELQJSLSHIWD IRUGLDPHWHU/IWD IRUGLDPHWHU/IW͗ͰhƐĞƌƐͰŵǀĂǁƚĞƌͰƌŽƉďŽdžͰLJKƚŚĞƌͰ&ŽƌŵĚŝƚƐͰ/YͲ^^sͰsĂƉŽƌ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐ&ŽƌŵƐͺsϲ͘Ϭ^ƵďͲ^ůĂďͬ^Žŝů'ĂƐ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐsĂƉŽƌ/ŶƐƚĂůůĂƚŝŽŶ&ŝĞůĚ&Žƌŵ,ĂƌƚΘ,ŝĐŬŵĂŶ͕WSSP&RQFUHWH&RQFUHWHSSP&RQFUHWH&RQFUHWH&RQFUHWH&RQFUHWHACO-002LESSunny, 50sSSV-26000SS T ~6in Clay N/A Full 52 Syringe 1L 16.1% Yes14316SSV-DUP11365SS T ~6in Clay N/A Full 52 Syringe 1L 16.1% Yes14316SSV-35935SS T ~6in Clay N/A Full 52 Syringe 1L 15.4% 0 ppm Yes13128SSV-45981SS T ~6in Clay N/A Full 52 Syringe 1L 15.3% 0 ppm Yes14327SSV-611362SS T ~6in Clay N/A Full 52 Syringe 1L 16.1% 0 ppm Yes14306SSV-111355SS T ~6in Clay N/A Full 64 Syrigne 1L 16.0% 0 ppm Yes6569
&Žƌŵ^sͲϭ6XE6ODE6RLO*DV9DSRU,QVWDOODWLRQ)LHOG)RUP3URMHFW1RBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB6DPSOHUBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB:HDWKHUBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB6XUIDFH0DWHULDO6ODE7KLFNQHVVLIDSSO0DWHULDO%HORZ6ODELIDSSO'HSWKRI6FUHHQLIDSSO7\SH 'DWH 7LPH$PELHQW7HPS3XUJH0HWKRG9ROXPH3XUJHG6KURXG+HOLXP&RQF3XUJH+HOLXP&RQF/HDN7HVW3DVV"VHHQRWH666*3HUP7HPS&RQFUHWHVRLOJUDYHODVSKDOW,QFKHV*UDYHOVDQGFOD\HWFIWEJV)XOOVDPSOHWUDLQRUSRLQWRQO\PPGG\\KUR)6\ULQJHSXPS/LWHUVVHHQRWHVIRUFDOFRUSSPLQGLFDWHXQLWVEHORZ<HV1R^͗͗Z͗^͗͗Z͗^͗͗Z͗^͗͗Z͗^͗͗Z͗^͗͗Z͗6 VDPSOH,'& FDQLVWHU,'5 UHJXODWRU,'66 VXEVODE6* VRLOJDV3HUP SHUPDQHQW7HPS WHPSRUDU\ 9ROXPH3XUJHG [SXUJHYROXPHV 
/
D/DVWXSGDWHG+J LQFKHVRIPHUFXU\SSP SDUWVSHUPLOOLRQ1RWHVBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB6DPSOH,'7\SH9DSRU0RQLWRULQJ3RLQW&RQVWUXFWLRQ +HOLXP/HDN7HVWEŽƚĞ͗>ĞĂŬdĞƐƚZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐWĞƌEYtDsĂƉŽƌ/ŶƚƌƵƐŝŽŶ'ƵŝĚĂŶĐĞ͕ůĞĂŬƚĞƐƚƉĂƐƐĞƐŝĨŚĞůŝƵŵĐŽŶĐĞŶƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŝŶƉƵƌŐĞĂŝƌŝƐůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶϭϬйŽĨŚĞůŝƵŵĐŽŶĐĞŶƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŝŶƐŚƌŽƵĚ͘/ OHQJWKRIWXELQJSLSHIWD IRUGLDPHWHU/IWD IRUGLDPHWHU/IW͗ͰhƐĞƌƐͰŵǀĂǁƚĞƌͰƌŽƉďŽdžͰLJKƚŚĞƌͰ&ŽƌŵĚŝƚƐͰ/YͲ^^sͰsĂƉŽƌ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐ&ŽƌŵƐͺsϲ͘Ϭ^ƵďͲ^ůĂďͬ^Žŝů'ĂƐ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐsĂƉŽƌ/ŶƐƚĂůůĂƚŝŽŶ&ŝĞůĚ&Žƌŵ,ĂƌƚΘ,ŝĐŬŵĂŶ͕W&RQFUHWH&RQFUHWHSSPACO-002 LES Sunny, 60sSSV-511355SG T ~6in gravel 5.5 Full 64 Syringe 1L 16.8% Yes6569SG-165982SG T N/A clay 7.0 Full 64 Syringe 1L 16.5% 0 ppm Yes16220SSV-5 was converted to a SG point due to water
&Žƌŵ^sͲϮ6XE6ODE6RLO*DV9DSRU6DPSOLQJ)LHOG)RUP3URMHFW1RBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 6DPSOHUBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB :HDWKHUBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB'DWH3URSRVHG6DPSOLQJ'XUDWLRQ7LPH&DQLVWHU3UHVVXUH2XWGRRU7HPSHUDWXUH2XWGRRU+XPLGLW\,QGRRU7HPSHUDWXUH,QGRRU+XPLGLW\PPGG\\ 0LQXWHVKU+JR)R)^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG6 VDPSOH,'& FDQLVWHU,'5 UHJXODWRU,'66 VXEVODE6* VRLOJDV3HUP SHUPDQHQW7HPS WHPSRUDU\/DVWXSGDWHG+J LQFKHVRIPHUFXU\1RWHVBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗6DPSOH,'^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗6DPSOLQJ,QIRUPDWLRQ ,QGRRU3DUDPHWHUV2XWGRRU3DUDPHWHUV6DPSOLQJ3HULRGEŽƚĞ͗WĞƌEYtDsĂƉŽƌ/ŶƚƌƵƐŝŽŶ'ƵŝĚĂŶĐĞ͕ƐŚƵƚͲŝŶƚĞƐƚĂŶĚŚĞůŝƵŵůĞĂŬĐŚĞĐŬŵƵƐƚďĞƉĂƐƐĞĚďĞĨŽƌĞƐĂŵƉůŝŶŐ͗͘ͰhƐĞƌƐͰŵǀĂǁƚĞƌͰƌŽƉďŽdžͰLJKƚŚĞƌͰ&ŽƌŵĚŝƚƐͰ/YͲ^^sͰsĂƉŽƌ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐ&ŽƌŵƐͺsϲ͘Ϭ^ƵďͲ^ůĂďͬ^Žŝů'ĂƐ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐsĂƉŽƌ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐ&ŝĞůĚ&Žƌŵ,ĂƌƚΘ,ŝĐŬŵĂŶ͕WACO-002LESSunny, 50sSSV-21L60002/16/22 100.1L/min1228 -1552 61 61143161234 -51220 -2840sSSV-DUP1L1220 -28113652/16/22 101228 -1552 61 40s 610.1L/min143161234 -5SSV-31332 -281L131282/16/22 1052 61 40s 6159350.1L/min1339 -151344 -5SSV-41409 -291L59812/16/22 101416 -1552 61 40s 61143270.1L/min1421 -5SSV-61455 -291L113622/16/22 101503 -1552 61 40s 610.1L/min143061508 -5SSV-11L1304 -292/17/2211355101311 -1565 78 60s 7065690.1L/min1317 -5
&Žƌŵ^sͲϮ6XE6ODE6RLO*DV9DSRU6DPSOLQJ)LHOG)RUP3URMHFW1RBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 6DPSOHUBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB :HDWKHUBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB'DWH3URSRVHG6DPSOLQJ'XUDWLRQ7LPH&DQLVWHU3UHVVXUH2XWGRRU7HPSHUDWXUH2XWGRRU+XPLGLW\,QGRRU7HPSHUDWXUH,QGRRU+XPLGLW\PPGG\\ 0LQXWHV KU +JR)R)^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG6 VDPSOH,'& FDQLVWHU,'5 UHJXODWRU,'66 VXEVODE6* VRLOJDV3HUP SHUPDQHQW7HPS WHPSRUDU\/DVWXSGDWHG+J LQFKHVRIPHUFXU\1RWHVBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗6DPSOH,'^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗6DPSOLQJ,QIRUPDWLRQ ,QGRRU3DUDPHWHUV2XWGRRU3DUDPHWHUV6DPSOLQJ3HULRGEŽƚĞ͗WĞƌEYtDsĂƉŽƌ/ŶƚƌƵƐŝŽŶ'ƵŝĚĂŶĐĞ͕ƐŚƵƚͲŝŶƚĞƐƚĂŶĚŚĞůŝƵŵůĞĂŬĐŚĞĐŬŵƵƐƚďĞƉĂƐƐĞĚďĞĨŽƌĞƐĂŵƉůŝŶŐ͗͘ͰhƐĞƌƐͰŵǀĂǁƚĞƌͰƌŽƉďŽdžͰLJKƚŚĞƌͰ&ŽƌŵĚŝƚƐͰ/YͲ^^sͰsĂƉŽƌ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐ&ŽƌŵƐͺsϲ͘Ϭ^ƵďͲ^ůĂďͬ^Žŝů'ĂƐ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐsĂƉŽƌ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐ&ŝĞůĚ&Žƌŵ,ĂƌƚΘ,ŝĐŬŵĂŶ͕WACO-002 LES 60s, SunnySSV-51L59112/17/22 100.1L/min1433 -1570 78 70162191438 -51424 -2760sSG-161L1342 -2959822/17/22 101349 -1570 78 N/A N/A0.1L/min162201354 -5
NOTES: Borehole cleared to 5' bgs using a hand auger.
generated using GroundLogs.online
Client:
Project:
Address:
ACO.002
BORING LOG
Boring No.
Page:
SG-16
1 of 1
Drilling Start Date:
Drilling End Date:
Drilling Company:
Drilling Method:
Drilling Equipment:
Driller:
Logged By:
2/17/2022
2/17/2022
Mid-South
Direct Push
GeoProbe DT54
Loryn Smith
Boring Depth (ft):
Boring Diameter (in):
Sampling Method(s):
DTW During Drilling (ft):
DTW After Drilling (ft):
Ground Surface Elev. (ft):
Location (X,Y):
7.0
3.25
Direct Push
DEPTH (ft)LITHOLOGYWATER LEVELBORINGCOMPLETIONCOLLECT
Sample TypeTimeBlow CountsRecovery (ft)SOIL/ROCK VISUAL DESCRIPTION
MEASURE
PID (ppm)Lab SampleDEPTH (ft)0
5
10
15
DP (0') Asphalt
(0.5') Clayey SILT (MH); trace fine-medium sand, medium stiff, moist, light tan and red
(4') Clayey SILT (MH); medium stiff, moist, red
(6') Silty CLAY (CL); stiff, moist, red
(6.5') Silty CLAY (CL); stiff, moist, gray brown and red
(7') Boring terminated
0.9
0.9
0.5
1.5
0
5
10
15
Harrelson Ford
6500 South Boulevard, Charlotte, NC
NOTES: Borehole cleared to 5' bgs using a hand auger.
generated using GroundLogs.online
BORING LOG
Boring No.
Page:
SSV-5
1 of 1
Drilling Start Date:
Drilling End Date:
Drilling Company:
Drilling Method:
Drilling Equipment:
Driller:
Logged By:
2/17/2022
2/17/2022
Mid-South
Direct Push
GeoProbe DT54
Loryn Smith
Boring Depth (ft):
Boring Diameter (in):
Sampling Method(s):
DTW During Drilling (ft):
DTW After Drilling (ft):
Ground Surface Elev. (ft):
Location (X,Y):
5.5
3.25
Direct Push
DEPTH (ft)LITHOLOGYWATER LEVELBORINGCOMPLETIONCOLLECT
Sample TypeTimeBlow CountsRecovery (ft)SOIL/ROCK VISUAL DESCRIPTION
MEASURE
PID (ppm)Lab SampleDEPTH (ft)0
5
10
15
DP (0') Concrete
(0.5') Clayey SILT (MH); medium stiff, moist, tan and brown
(2.5') Clayey SILT (MH); medium stiff, moist, gray and green
(5') Silty CLAY (CL); stiff, moist, red and brown
(5.5') Boring terminated
18.0
11.6
5.8
0
5
10
15
Client:
Project:
Address:
ACO.002
Harrelson Ford
6500 South Boulevard, Charlotte, NC
NOTES: Borehole cleared to 5' bgs using a hand auger
generated using GroundLogs.online
BORING LOG
Boring No.
Page:
SB-9
1 of 1
Drilling Start Date:
Drilling End Date:
Drilling Company:
Drilling Method:
Drilling Equipment:
Driller:
Logged By:
2/17/2022
2/17/2022
Mid-South
Direct Push
GeoProbe DT54
Loryn Smith
Boring Depth (ft):
Boring Diameter (in):
Sampling Method(s):
DTW During Drilling (ft):
DTW After Drilling (ft):
Ground Surface Elev. (ft):
Location (X,Y):
10.0
3.25
Grab
DEPTH (ft)LITHOLOGYWATER LEVELBORINGCOMPLETIONCOLLECT
Sample TypeTimeBlow CountsRecovery (ft)SOIL/ROCK VISUAL DESCRIPTION
MEASURE
PID (ppm)Lab SampleDEPTH (ft)0
5
10
15
GR
GR 1.50
(0') Asphalt
(0.5') Clayey SILT (MH); trace fine-medium sand, medium stiff, moist, tan, brown,
and red
(2.5') Clayey SILT (MH); trace fine-medium sand, medium stiff, moist, red
(4.5') Clayey SILT (MH); stiff, moist, orange and red
(5') Clayey SILT (MH); stiff, moist, light tan with orange mottling
(6.5') Clayey SILT (MH); medium stiff, moist, dark brown, red, and orange
(7') Sandy SILT (ML); soft, moist, orange, red, and tan
(10') Boring terminated
1.4
1.1
1.6
1.6
1.3
2.0
1.8
2.0
2.3
1.9
SB-9
0
5
10
15
Client:
Project:
Address:
ACO.002
Harrelson Ford
6500 South Boulevard, Charlotte, NC

Appendix B

Laboratory Analytical Report

Laboratory's liability in any claim relating to analyses performed shall be limited to, at laboratory's option, repeating the
analysis in question at laboratory's expense, or the refund of the charges paid for performance of said analysis.

3/1/2022
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte) Haley Martin
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100 Charlotte, NC, 28203
Ref: Analytical Testing
Lab Report Number: 22-048-0004 Client Project Description: ACO-002
Dear Haley Martin:
Waypoint Analytical, LLC (Charlotte) received sample(s) on 2/17/2022 for the analyses presented in the
following report.
The above referenced project has been analyzed per your instructions. The analyses were performed in accordance with the applicable analytical method.
The analytical data has been validated using standard quality control measures performed as required by the
analytical method. Quality Assurance, method validations, instrumentation maintenance and calibration for all parameters were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the USEPA (including 40 CFR 136
Method Update Rule May 2021) unless otherwise indicated. Certain parameters (chlorine, pH, dissolved oxygen, sulfite...) are required to be analyzed within 15 minutes of sampling. Usually, but not always, any field parameter analyzed at the laboratory is outside of this holding time.
Refer to sample analysis time for confirmation of holding time compliance.
The results are shown on the attached Report of Analysis(s). Results for solid matrices are reported on an as-received basis unless otherwise indicated. This report shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to
the samples included in this report. Please do not hesitate to contact me or client services if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely,
Angela D Overcash Senior Project Manager
Page 1 of 56
Certification Summary
Laboratory ID: WP CNC: Waypoint Analytical Carolina, Inc. (C), Charlotte, NC
State Program Lab ID Expiration Date
07/31/202237735State ProgramNorth Carolina
12/31/2022402State ProgramNorth Carolina
07/31/202299012State ProgramSouth Carolina
12/31/202199012State ProgramSouth Carolina
Page 1 of 1 00016/22-048-0004
Page 2 of 56
Report Number:
Sample Summary Table
Client Project Description:
22-048-0004
ACO-002
Lab No Client Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received Method Lab ID
02/17/2022 11:20Solids 94336 SB-9(6-7)02/17/2022 11:55 7199
02/17/2022 11:20Solids 94336 SB-9(6-7)02/17/2022 11:55
02/17/2022Solids 94337 SB-DUP 02/17/2022 11:55 7199
02/17/2022Solids 94337 SB-DUP 02/17/2022 11:55
: Eurofins Eaton Analytical, Inc. - PA Lab, Lancaster, PA
Page 3 of 56
Summary of Detected Analytes
QualifiersAnalyzedUnitsResult
Report Number:
Client Sample ID
Method Parameters
Lab Sample ID
22-048-0004
Report Limit
Project:ACO-002
V 94336SB-9(6-7)
1.86 02/21/2022 19:126020BArsenicmg/Kg - dry 0.172
19.4 02/21/2022 19:126020BBariummg/Kg - dry 1.76
70.1 02/21/2022 19:126020BChromiummg/Kg - dry 0.248
12.0 02/21/2022 19:126020BLeadmg/Kg - dry 0.183
J0.005 02/17/2022 16:068260DAcetonemg/Kg - dry 0.003
20.3 02/21/2022 15:35SW-DRYWT Moisture %
V 94337SB-DUP
1.75 02/21/2022 18:086020BArsenicmg/Kg - dry 0.173
18.4 02/21/2022 18:086020BBariummg/Kg - dry 1.77
75.3 02/21/2022 18:086020BChromiummg/Kg - dry 0.250
12.8 02/21/2022 18:086020BLeadmg/Kg - dry 0.185
J0.004 02/17/2022 16:348260DAcetonemg/Kg - dry 0.003
21.0 02/21/2022 15:35SW-DRYWT Moisture %
Page 4 of 56
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-048-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
Received : 02/17/2022
ACO-002
Report Date : 03/01/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SB-9(6-7)
94336 Matrix:
2/17/2022 11:20
Solids
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Method
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
20.3 %Moisture 1 02/21/22 15:35 SW-DRYWTTJW
1.86 mg/Kg - dry 0.172 1.25Arsenic 10 02/21/22 19:12 6020BEDV
19.4 mg/Kg - dry 1.76 12.5Barium 10 02/21/22 19:12 6020BEDV
<0.0828 mg/Kg - dry 0.0828 0.627Cadmium 10 02/21/22 19:12 6020BEDV
70.1 mg/Kg - dry 0.248 1.25Chromium 10 02/21/22 19:12 6020BEDV
12.0 mg/Kg - dry 0.183 1.25
Lead 10 02/21/22 19:12 6020BEDV
<0.0151 mg/Kg - dry 0.0151 0.0376Mercury (Total)1 02/22/22 15:04 7471BEDV
<0.929 mg/Kg - dry 0.929 2.51Selenium 10 02/22/22 13:59 6020BEDV
<0.0589 mg/Kg - dry 0.0589 0.627Silver 10 02/21/22 19:12 6020BEDV
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 5 of 56
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-048-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
Received : 02/17/2022
ACO-002
Report Date : 03/01/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SB-9(6-7)
94336 Matrix:
2/17/2022 11:20
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
5035 LOW
8260D Prep Batch(es):V15100 02/17/22 08:00
0.005 J mg/Kg - dry 0.003 0.025Acetone 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.025Acrolein 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0009 mg/Kg - dry 0.0009 0.025Acrylonitrile 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006Benzene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.006Bromobenzene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Bromochloromethane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Bromodichloromethane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Bromoform 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.002 mg/Kg - dry 0.002 0.012
Bromomethane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.006n-Butylbenzene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006sec-Butyl benzene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.006tert-Butyl benzene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.006Carbon Disulfide 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Carbon Tetrachloride 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.006Chlorobenzene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006
Chlorodibromomethane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.012Chloroethane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Chloroform 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.012Chloromethane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.0062-Chlorotoluene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0005 mg/Kg - dry 0.0005 0.0064-Chlorotoluene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0009 mg/Kg - dry 0.0009 0.006Di-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 6 of 56
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-048-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
Received : 02/17/2022
ACO-002
Report Date : 03/01/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SB-9(6-7)
94336 Matrix:
2/17/2022 11:20
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
5035 LOW
8260D Prep Batch(es):V15100 02/17/22 08:00
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.0121,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.0061,2-Dibromoethane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006Dibromomethane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0004 mg/Kg - dry 0.0004 0.0061,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0005 mg/Kg - dry 0.0005 0.0061,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.0061,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.012Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.0061,1-Dichloroethane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006
1,2-Dichloroethane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0009 mg/Kg - dry 0.0009 0.0061,1-Dichloroethene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0010 mg/Kg - dry 0.0010 0.006cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.0061,2-Dichloropropane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.0061,3-Dichloropropane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.0062,2-Dichloropropane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0010 mg/Kg - dry 0.0010 0.006
1,1-Dichloropropene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.017 mg/Kg - dry 0.017 0.313Ethanol 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006Ethylbenzene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.062Ethyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (ETBE)1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0010 mg/Kg - dry 0.0010 0.012Hexachlorobutadiene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 7 of 56
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-048-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
Received : 02/17/2022
ACO-002
Report Date : 03/01/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SB-9(6-7)
94336 Matrix:
2/17/2022 11:20
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
5035 LOW
8260D Prep Batch(es):V15100 02/17/22 08:00
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.012n-Hexane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.0252-Hexanone 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.006Isopropylbenzene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.0064-Isopropyl toluene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.025Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.006Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.018 mg/Kg - dry 0.018 0.0254-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.012Methylene Chloride 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.012
Naphthalene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006n-Propylbenzene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Styrene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.0061,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0004 mg/Kg - dry 0.0004 0.0061,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Tetrachloroethene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.006Toluene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.012
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.0121,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.0061,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.0061,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Trichloroethene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.002 mg/Kg - dry 0.002 0.012Trichlorofluoromethane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0009 mg/Kg - dry 0.0009 0.0061,2,3-Trichloropropane 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 8 of 56
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-048-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
Received : 02/17/2022
ACO-002
Report Date : 03/01/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SB-9(6-7)
94336 Matrix:
2/17/2022 11:20
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
5035 LOW
8260D Prep Batch(es):V15100 02/17/22 08:00
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.0061,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.0061,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.012Vinyl Acetate 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.012Vinyl Chloride 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.006o-Xylene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.012m,p-Xylene 1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.006Xylene (Total)1 02/17/22 16:06 V15101
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101 Limits: 70-130%02/17/22 16:061 TBL V15101
Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 101 Limits: 84-123%02/17/22 16:061 TBL V15101
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 98.0 Limits: 76-129%02/17/22 16:061 TBL V15101
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
3546
8270E Prep Batch(es):V15151 02/21/22 08:35
<0.145 mg/Kg - dry 0.145 0.829Acenaphthene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.131 mg/Kg - dry 0.131 0.829Acenaphthylene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.190 mg/Kg - dry 0.190 0.829Aniline 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.179 mg/Kg - dry 0.179 0.829Anthracene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.174 mg/Kg - dry 0.174 0.829
Benzo(a)anthracene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.184 mg/Kg - dry 0.184 0.829Benzo(a)pyrene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.183 mg/Kg - dry 0.183 0.829Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.170 mg/Kg - dry 0.170 0.829Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 9 of 56
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-048-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
Received : 02/17/2022
ACO-002
Report Date : 03/01/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SB-9(6-7)
94336 Matrix:
2/17/2022 11:20
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
3546
8270E Prep Batch(es):V15151 02/21/22 08:35
<0.171 mg/Kg - dry 0.171 0.829Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.727 mg/Kg - dry 0.727 2.51Benzoic Acid 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.131 mg/Kg - dry 0.131 0.829Benzyl alcohol 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.148 mg/Kg - dry 0.148 0.829Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.134 mg/Kg - dry 0.134 0.829Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.170 mg/Kg - dry 0.170 0.414Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.150 mg/Kg - dry 0.150 0.829Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.136 mg/Kg - dry 0.136 0.8294-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.141 mg/Kg - dry 0.141 0.414
Butyl benzyl phthalate 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.116 mg/Kg - dry 0.116 0.8294-Chloro-3-methylphenol 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.140 mg/Kg - dry 0.140 0.4144-Chloroaniline 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.145 mg/Kg - dry 0.145 0.8292-Chloronaphthalene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.123 mg/Kg - dry 0.123 0.8292-Chlorophenol 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.158 mg/Kg - dry 0.158 1.254-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.178 mg/Kg - dry 0.178 0.829Chrysene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.288 mg/Kg - dry 0.288 0.829
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.149 mg/Kg - dry 0.149 0.829Dibenzofuran 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.118 mg/Kg - dry 0.118 0.8291,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.122 mg/Kg - dry 0.122 0.8291,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.122 mg/Kg - dry 0.122 0.4141,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.184 mg/Kg - dry 0.184 0.8293,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.120 mg/Kg - dry 0.120 0.8292,4-Dichlorophenol 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 10 of 56
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-048-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
Received : 02/17/2022
ACO-002
Report Date : 03/01/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SB-9(6-7)
94336 Matrix:
2/17/2022 11:20
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
3546
8270E Prep Batch(es):V15151 02/21/22 08:35
<0.225 mg/Kg - dry 0.225 0.829Diethyl phthalate 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.218 mg/Kg - dry 0.218 0.829Dimethyl phthalate 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.135 mg/Kg - dry 0.135 0.4142,4-Dimethylphenol 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.134 mg/Kg - dry 0.134 0.829Di-n-butyl phthalate 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.301 mg/Kg - dry 0.301 1.884,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.652 mg/Kg - dry 0.652 1.882,4-Dinitrophenol 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.121 mg/Kg - dry 0.121 0.8292,4-Dinitrotoluene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.135 mg/Kg - dry 0.135 0.8292,6-Dinitrotoluene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.179 mg/Kg - dry 0.179 0.414
Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.154 mg/Kg - dry 0.154 0.829Fluoranthene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.160 mg/Kg - dry 0.160 0.829Fluorene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.132 mg/Kg - dry 0.132 0.829Hexachlorobenzene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.122 mg/Kg - dry 0.122 0.829Hexachlorobutadiene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.196 mg/Kg - dry 0.196 0.829Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.099 mg/Kg - dry 0.099 0.829Hexachloroethane 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.224 mg/Kg - dry 0.224 0.829
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.239 mg/Kg - dry 0.239 0.829Isophorone 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.132 mg/Kg - dry 0.132 0.8291-Methylnaphthalene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.125 mg/Kg - dry 0.125 0.8292-Methylnaphthalene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.121 mg/Kg - dry 0.121 0.8292-Methylphenol 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.106 mg/Kg - dry 0.106 0.8293&4 Methylphenol 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.180 mg/Kg - dry 0.180 0.829Naphthalene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 11 of 56
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-048-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
Received : 02/17/2022
ACO-002
Report Date : 03/01/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SB-9(6-7)
94336 Matrix:
2/17/2022 11:20
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
3546
8270E Prep Batch(es):V15151 02/21/22 08:35
<0.121 mg/Kg - dry 0.121 0.8292-Nitroaniline 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.150 mg/Kg - dry 0.150 0.8293-Nitroaniline 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.117 mg/Kg - dry 0.117 0.4144-Nitroaniline 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.145 mg/Kg - dry 0.145 0.414Nitrobenzene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.111 mg/Kg - dry 0.111 0.8292-Nitrophenol 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.146 mg/Kg - dry 0.146 0.8294-Nitrophenol 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.329 mg/Kg - dry 0.329 0.829N-Nitrosodimethylamine 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.227 mg/Kg - dry 0.227 0.829N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.148 mg/Kg - dry 0.148 0.829
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.435 mg/Kg - dry 0.435 1.25Pentachlorophenol 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.260 mg/Kg - dry 0.260 0.829Phenanthrene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.140 mg/Kg - dry 0.140 0.829Phenol 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.168 mg/Kg - dry 0.168 0.829Pyrene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.099 mg/Kg - dry 0.099 0.414Pyridine 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.134 mg/Kg - dry 0.134 0.8291,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.120 mg/Kg - dry 0.120 0.829
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
<0.121 mg/Kg - dry 0.121 0.8292,4,6-Trichlorophenol 1 02/21/22 19:22 V15214JMV
8270ESurrogate: Phenol-d5 101 Limits: 34-121%02/21/22 19:221 JMV
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 71.9 Limits: 44-115%02/21/22 19:221 JMV V15214
Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 91.3 Limits: 35-115%02/21/22 19:221 JMV V15214
Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 67.1 Limits: 37-122%02/21/22 19:221 JMV V15214
Surrogate: 4-Terphenyl-d14 81.4 Limits: 54-127%02/21/22 19:221 JMV V15214
Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 78.4 Limits: 39-132%02/21/22 19:221 JMV V15214
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 12 of 56
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-048-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
Received : 02/17/2022
ACO-002
Report Date : 03/01/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SB-DUP
94337 Matrix:
2/17/2022 0:00
Solids
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Method
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
21.0 %Moisture 1 02/21/22 15:35 SW-DRYWTTJW
1.75 mg/Kg - dry 0.173 1.27Arsenic 10 02/21/22 18:08 6020BEDV
18.4 mg/Kg - dry 1.77 12.7Barium 10 02/21/22 18:08 6020BEDV
<0.0835 mg/Kg - dry 0.0835 0.633Cadmium 10 02/21/22 18:08 6020BEDV
75.3 mg/Kg - dry 0.250 1.27Chromium 10 02/21/22 18:08 6020BEDV
12.8 mg/Kg - dry 0.185 1.27
Lead 10 02/21/22 18:08 6020BEDV
<0.0152 mg/Kg - dry 0.0152 0.0380Mercury (Total)1 02/22/22 15:20 7471BEDV
<0.937 mg/Kg - dry 0.937 2.53Selenium 10 02/22/22 13:52 6020BEDV
<0.0594 mg/Kg - dry 0.0594 0.633Silver 10 02/21/22 18:08 6020BEDV
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 13 of 56
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-048-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
Received : 02/17/2022
ACO-002
Report Date : 03/01/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SB-DUP
94337 Matrix:
2/17/2022 0:00
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
5035 LOW
8260D Prep Batch(es):V15100 02/17/22 08:00
0.004 J mg/Kg - dry 0.003 0.025Acetone 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.025Acrolein 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0009 mg/Kg - dry 0.0009 0.025Acrylonitrile 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006Benzene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.006Bromobenzene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Bromochloromethane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Bromodichloromethane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Bromoform 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.002 mg/Kg - dry 0.002 0.012
Bromomethane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.006n-Butylbenzene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006sec-Butyl benzene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.006tert-Butyl benzene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.006Carbon Disulfide 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.002 mg/Kg - dry 0.002 0.006Carbon Tetrachloride 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.006Chlorobenzene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006
Chlorodibromomethane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.012Chloroethane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Chloroform 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.012Chloromethane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.0062-Chlorotoluene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0005 mg/Kg - dry 0.0005 0.0064-Chlorotoluene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0009 mg/Kg - dry 0.0009 0.006Di-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 14 of 56
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-048-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
Received : 02/17/2022
ACO-002
Report Date : 03/01/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SB-DUP
94337 Matrix:
2/17/2022 0:00
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
5035 LOW
8260D Prep Batch(es):V15100 02/17/22 08:00
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.0121,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.0061,2-Dibromoethane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006Dibromomethane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0004 mg/Kg - dry 0.0004 0.0061,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0005 mg/Kg - dry 0.0005 0.0061,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.0061,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.012Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.0061,1-Dichloroethane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006
1,2-Dichloroethane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0009 mg/Kg - dry 0.0009 0.0061,1-Dichloroethene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.0061,2-Dichloropropane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.0061,3-Dichloropropane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.0062,2-Dichloropropane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0010 mg/Kg - dry 0.0010 0.006
1,1-Dichloropropene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.017 mg/Kg - dry 0.017 0.316Ethanol 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006Ethylbenzene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.063Ethyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (ETBE)1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.012Hexachlorobutadiene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 15 of 56
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-048-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
Received : 02/17/2022
ACO-002
Report Date : 03/01/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SB-DUP
94337 Matrix:
2/17/2022 0:00
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
5035 LOW
8260D Prep Batch(es):V15100 02/17/22 08:00
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.012n-Hexane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.0252-Hexanone 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.006Isopropylbenzene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.0064-Isopropyl toluene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.025Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.006Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.018 mg/Kg - dry 0.018 0.0254-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.012Methylene Chloride 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.012
Naphthalene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.006n-Propylbenzene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Styrene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.0061,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0004 mg/Kg - dry 0.0004 0.0061,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Tetrachloroethene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.006Toluene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.012
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0008 mg/Kg - dry 0.0008 0.0121,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.0061,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.0061,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.006Trichloroethene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.002 mg/Kg - dry 0.002 0.012Trichlorofluoromethane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0009 mg/Kg - dry 0.0009 0.0061,2,3-Trichloropropane 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 16 of 56
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-048-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
Received : 02/17/2022
ACO-002
Report Date : 03/01/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SB-DUP
94337 Matrix:
2/17/2022 0:00
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
5035 LOW
8260D Prep Batch(es):V15100 02/17/22 08:00
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.0061,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0007 mg/Kg - dry 0.0007 0.0061,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.012Vinyl Acetate 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.012Vinyl Chloride 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.006o-Xylene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.001 mg/Kg - dry 0.001 0.012m,p-Xylene 1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101TBL
<0.0006 mg/Kg - dry 0.0006 0.006Xylene (Total)1 02/17/22 16:34 V15101
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.5 Limits: 70-130%02/17/22 16:341 TBL V15101
Surrogate: Dibromofluoromethane 101 Limits: 84-123%02/17/22 16:341 TBL V15101
Surrogate: Toluene-d8 98.4 Limits: 76-129%02/17/22 16:341 TBL V15101
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
3546
8270E Prep Batch(es):V15151 02/21/22 08:35
<0.146 mg/Kg - dry 0.146 0.835Acenaphthene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.132 mg/Kg - dry 0.132 0.835Acenaphthylene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.192 mg/Kg - dry 0.192 0.835Aniline 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.181 mg/Kg - dry 0.181 0.835Anthracene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.175 mg/Kg - dry 0.175 0.835
Benzo(a)anthracene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.186 mg/Kg - dry 0.186 0.835Benzo(a)pyrene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.184 mg/Kg - dry 0.184 0.835Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.172 mg/Kg - dry 0.172 0.835Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 17 of 56
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-048-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
Received : 02/17/2022
ACO-002
Report Date : 03/01/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SB-DUP
94337 Matrix:
2/17/2022 0:00
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
3546
8270E Prep Batch(es):V15151 02/21/22 08:35
<0.173 mg/Kg - dry 0.173 0.835Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.734 mg/Kg - dry 0.734 2.53Benzoic Acid 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.132 mg/Kg - dry 0.132 0.835Benzyl alcohol 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.149 mg/Kg - dry 0.149 0.835Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.135 mg/Kg - dry 0.135 0.835Bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.172 mg/Kg - dry 0.172 0.417Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.151 mg/Kg - dry 0.151 0.835Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.137 mg/Kg - dry 0.137 0.8354-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.143 mg/Kg - dry 0.143 0.417
Butyl benzyl phthalate 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.116 mg/Kg - dry 0.116 0.8354-Chloro-3-methylphenol 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.141 mg/Kg - dry 0.141 0.4174-Chloroaniline 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.146 mg/Kg - dry 0.146 0.8352-Chloronaphthalene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.124 mg/Kg - dry 0.124 0.8352-Chlorophenol 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.159 mg/Kg - dry 0.159 1.274-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.179 mg/Kg - dry 0.179 0.835Chrysene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.291 mg/Kg - dry 0.291 0.835
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.150 mg/Kg - dry 0.150 0.835Dibenzofuran 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.119 mg/Kg - dry 0.119 0.8351,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.123 mg/Kg - dry 0.123 0.8351,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.123 mg/Kg - dry 0.123 0.4171,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.186 mg/Kg - dry 0.186 0.8353,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.121 mg/Kg - dry 0.121 0.8352,4-Dichlorophenol 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 18 of 56
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-048-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
Received : 02/17/2022
ACO-002
Report Date : 03/01/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SB-DUP
94337 Matrix:
2/17/2022 0:00
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
3546
8270E Prep Batch(es):V15151 02/21/22 08:35
<0.227 mg/Kg - dry 0.227 0.835Diethyl phthalate 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.220 mg/Kg - dry 0.220 0.835Dimethyl phthalate 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.136 mg/Kg - dry 0.136 0.4172,4-Dimethylphenol 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.135 mg/Kg - dry 0.135 0.835Di-n-butyl phthalate 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.303 mg/Kg - dry 0.303 1.904,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.658 mg/Kg - dry 0.658 1.902,4-Dinitrophenol 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.122 mg/Kg - dry 0.122 0.8352,4-Dinitrotoluene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.136 mg/Kg - dry 0.136 0.8352,6-Dinitrotoluene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.181 mg/Kg - dry 0.181 0.417
Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.155 mg/Kg - dry 0.155 0.835Fluoranthene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.162 mg/Kg - dry 0.162 0.835Fluorene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.134 mg/Kg - dry 0.134 0.835Hexachlorobenzene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.123 mg/Kg - dry 0.123 0.835Hexachlorobutadiene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.198 mg/Kg - dry 0.198 0.835Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.100 mg/Kg - dry 0.100 0.835Hexachloroethane 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.226 mg/Kg - dry 0.226 0.835
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.241 mg/Kg - dry 0.241 0.835Isophorone 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.134 mg/Kg - dry 0.134 0.8351-Methylnaphthalene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.126 mg/Kg - dry 0.126 0.8352-Methylnaphthalene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.122 mg/Kg - dry 0.122 0.8352-Methylphenol 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.107 mg/Kg - dry 0.107 0.8353&4 Methylphenol 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.182 mg/Kg - dry 0.182 0.835Naphthalene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Method Quantitation LimitMQL
Page 19 of 56
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-048-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
Received : 02/17/2022
ACO-002
Report Date : 03/01/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SB-DUP
94337 Matrix:
2/17/2022 0:00
Solids
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
3546
8270E Prep Batch(es):V15151 02/21/22 08:35
<0.122 mg/Kg - dry 0.122 0.8352-Nitroaniline 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.151 mg/Kg - dry 0.151 0.8353-Nitroaniline 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.118 mg/Kg - dry 0.118 0.4174-Nitroaniline 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.146 mg/Kg - dry 0.146 0.417Nitrobenzene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.112 mg/Kg - dry 0.112 0.8352-Nitrophenol 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.148 mg/Kg - dry 0.148 0.8354-Nitrophenol 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.332 mg/Kg - dry 0.332 0.835N-Nitrosodimethylamine 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.229 mg/Kg - dry 0.229 0.835N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.149 mg/Kg - dry 0.149 0.835
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.439 mg/Kg - dry 0.439 1.27Pentachlorophenol 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.263 mg/Kg - dry 0.263 0.835Phenanthrene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.141 mg/Kg - dry 0.141 0.835Phenol 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.169 mg/Kg - dry 0.169 0.835Pyrene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.100 mg/Kg - dry 0.100 0.417Pyridine 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.135 mg/Kg - dry 0.135 0.8351,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.121 mg/Kg - dry 0.121 0.835
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
<0.122 mg/Kg - dry 0.122 0.8352,4,6-Trichlorophenol 1 02/21/22 19:44 V15214JMV
8270ESurrogate: Phenol-d5 73.6 Limits: 34-121%02/21/22 19:441 JMV
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 76.6 Limits: 44-115%02/21/22 19:441 JMV V15214
Surrogate: 2-Fluorophenol 75.1 Limits: 35-115%02/21/22 19:441 JMV V15214
Surrogate: Nitrobenzene-d5 105 Limits: 37-122%02/21/22 19:441 JMV V15214
Surrogate: 4-Terphenyl-d14 80.8 Limits: 54-127%02/21/22 19:441 JMV V15214
Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 82.9 Limits: 39-132%02/21/22 19:441 JMV V15214
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Estimated valueJDilution FactorDF
Page 20 of 56
Page 21 of 56
Page 22 of 56
Page 23 of 56





 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Page 24 of 56
















Page 25 of 56






 


     




 


     



Page 26 of 56







 
    
  




 
    
  




 
    
  




 
    
  

Page 27 of 56







 
      
 
 



 
      
 
 



    

 
  







   

 
  







   

 
  







    

 
  





Page 28 of 56





    
  
  
  
  
  

    
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   


    
  
  

Page 29 of 56






    

 











   

 








     
    
     



    

 











   

 








     
    
     



Page 30 of 56





 
  


   
 

Page 31 of 56



 
 
 
 






Page 32 of 56



   
   
   

Page 33 of 56
Page 34 of 56



 
























Page 35 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Metals Analyses
6020B
V15206QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
3050B
QC Prep:V15160
Associated Lab Samples: 94336, 94337
LRB-V15160 Matrix: SOLLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
02/21/22 17:551.000.137<0.137mg/KgArsenic
02/21/22 17:5510.01.40<1.40mg/KgBarium
02/21/22 17:550.5000.0660<0.0660mg/KgCadmium
02/21/22 17:551.000.198<0.198mg/KgChromium
02/21/22 17:551.000.146<0.146mg/KgLead
02/21/22 17:552.000.741<0.741mg/KgSelenium
02/21/22 17:550.5000.0470<0.0470mg/KgSilver
LCS-V15160Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
92.011.512.5mg/KgArsenic 80-120
97.012.112.5mg/KgBarium 80-120
94.011.712.5mg/KgCadmium 80-120
93.011.612.5mg/KgChromium 80-120
94.011.812.5mg/KgLead 80-120
94.011.712.5mg/KgSelenium 80-120
90.04.495.00mg/KgSilver 80-120
V 94337-MS-V15160 V 94337-MSD-V15160Matrix Spike & Matrix Spike Duplicate
MS Result
Parameter
Max
RPD
MS
%Rec
MSD
Result
MSD
Spike
Conc.
MS Spike
Conc.ResultUnits
%Rec
Limits
MSD
%Rec RPD
11.1 78.011.612.512.51.38mg/KgArsenic 82.0 75-125 4.4 20
28.8 11430.612.512.514.5mg/KgBarium 129*75-125 6.0 20
11.9 95.012.412.512.5<0.0660mg/KgCadmium 99.0 75-125 4.1 20
71.7 98.080.612.512.559.5mg/KgChromium 169*75-125 11.6 20
Page 1 of 19* QC Fail Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 36 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Metals Analyses
6020B
V15206QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
3050B
QC Prep:V15160
V 94337-MS-V15160 V 94337-MSD-V15160Matrix Spike & Matrix Spike Duplicate
MS Result
Parameter
Max
RPD
MS
%Rec
MSD
Result
MSD
Spike
Conc.
MS Spike
Conc.ResultUnits
%Rec
Limits
MSD
%Rec RPD
22.0 95.023.012.512.510.1mg/KgLead 103 75-125 4.4 20
11.2 90.011.612.512.50.786mg/KgSelenium 93.0 75-125 3.5 20
4.54 91.04.725.005.00<0.0470mg/KgSilver 94.0 75-125 3.8 20
V 94337-PDS-V15160Post Digestion Spike
Parameter
Analyzed%
Recovery
PDS
ResultUnits
02/21/22 18:2711014.6mg/KgArsenic
02/21/22 18:2710821.4mg/KgBarium
02/21/22 18:2711013.7mg/KgCadmium
02/21/22 18:2710443.9mg/KgChromium
02/21/22 18:2710618.7mg/KgLead
02/21/22 18:2711214.0mg/KgSelenium
02/21/22 18:2710913.6mg/KgSilver
Page 2 of 19Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 37 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Solids Total Mercury Analysis - CVAA
7471B
V15239QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
7471B (Prep)
QC Prep:V15178
Associated Lab Samples: 94336, 94337
LRB-V15178 Matrix: SOLLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
02/22/22 14:570.03000.0120<0.0120mg/KgMercury (Total)
LCS-V15178Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
1060.4410.417mg/KgMercury (Total)80-120
V 94336-MS-V15178 V 94336-MSD-V15178Matrix Spike & Matrix Spike Duplicate
MS Result
Parameter
Max
RPD
MS
%Rec
MSD
Result
MSD
Spike
Conc.
MS Spike
Conc.ResultUnits
%Rec
Limits
MSD
%Rec RPD
0.398 96.00.4300.4170.417<0.0120mg/KgMercury (Total)103 80-120 7.7 20
V 94336-PDS-V15178Post Digestion Spike
Parameter
Analyzed%
Recovery
PDS
ResultUnits
02/22/22 15:1497.00.202mg/KgMercury (Total)
Page 3 of 19Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 38 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8260D
V15101QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
5035 LOW
QC Prep:V15100
Associated Lab Samples: 94336, 94337
LRB-V15100 Matrix: SOLLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
02/17/22 13:190.0200.002<0.002mg/KgAcetone
02/17/22 13:190.0200.001<0.001mg/KgAcrolein
02/17/22 13:190.0200.0008<0.0008mg/KgAcrylonitrile
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0006<0.0006mg/KgBenzene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0005<0.0005mg/KgBromobenzene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0008<0.0008mg/KgBromochloromethane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.001<0.001mg/KgBromodichloromethane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.001<0.001mg/KgBromoform
02/17/22 13:190.0100.001<0.001mg/KgBromomethane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kgn-Butylbenzene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0006<0.0006mg/Kgsec-Butyl benzene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kgtert-Butyl benzene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0006<0.0006mg/KgCarbon Disulfide
02/17/22 13:190.0050.001<0.001mg/KgCarbon Tetrachloride
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0007<0.0007mg/KgChlorobenzene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0009<0.0009mg/KgChlorodibromomethane
02/17/22 13:190.0100.0009<0.0009mg/KgChloroethane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.001<0.001mg/KgChloroform
02/17/22 13:190.0100.0006<0.0006mg/KgChloromethane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kg2-Chlorotoluene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0004<0.0004mg/Kg4-Chlorotoluene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0007<0.0007mg/KgDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)
02/17/22 13:190.0100.0004<0.0004mg/Kg1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0006<0.0006mg/Kg1,2-Dibromoethane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0006<0.0006mg/KgDibromomethane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0003<0.0003mg/Kg1,2-Dichlorobenzene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0004<0.0004mg/Kg1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Page 4 of 19Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 39 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8260D
V15101QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
5035 LOW
QC Prep:V15100
Associated Lab Samples: 94336, 94337
LRB-V15100 Matrix: SOLLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0006<0.0006mg/Kg1,4-Dichlorobenzene
02/17/22 13:190.0100.001<0.001mg/KgDichlorodifluoromethane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0008<0.0008mg/Kg1,1-Dichloroethane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.001<0.001mg/Kg1,2-Dichloroethane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0007<0.0007mg/Kg1,1-Dichloroethene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0008<0.0008mg/Kgcis-1,2-Dichloroethene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.001<0.001mg/Kgtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0004<0.0004mg/Kg1,2-Dichloropropane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0006<0.0006mg/Kg1,3-Dichloropropane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.001<0.001mg/Kg2,2-Dichloropropane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0008<0.0008mg/Kg1,1-Dichloropropene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kgcis-1,3-Dichloropropene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0008<0.0008mg/Kgtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene
02/17/22 13:190.2500.014<0.014mg/KgEthanol
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0006<0.0006mg/KgEthylbenzene
02/17/22 13:190.0500.0008<0.0008mg/KgEthyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (ETBE)
02/17/22 13:190.0100.0008<0.0008mg/KgHexachlorobutadiene
02/17/22 13:190.0100.0007<0.0007mg/Kgn-Hexane
02/17/22 13:190.0200.0006<0.0006mg/Kg2-Hexanone
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0005<0.0005mg/KgIsopropylbenzene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.001<0.001mg/Kg4-Isopropyl toluene
02/17/22 13:190.0200.0007<0.0007mg/KgMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0006<0.0006mg/KgMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
02/17/22 13:190.0200.015<0.015mg/Kg4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
02/17/22 13:190.0100.001<0.001mg/KgMethylene Chloride
02/17/22 13:190.0100.0010<0.0010mg/KgNaphthalene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kgn-Propylbenzene
Page 5 of 19Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 40 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8260D
V15101QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
5035 LOW
QC Prep:V15100
Associated Lab Samples: 94336, 94337
LRB-V15100 Matrix: SOLLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
02/17/22 13:190.0050.001<0.001mg/KgStyrene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.001<0.001mg/Kg1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0003<0.0003mg/Kg1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0009<0.0009mg/KgTetrachloroethene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0007<0.0007mg/KgToluene
02/17/22 13:190.0100.0005<0.0005mg/Kg1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
02/17/22 13:190.0100.0006<0.0006mg/Kg1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.001<0.001mg/Kg1,1,1-Trichloroethane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kg1,1,2-Trichloroethane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0009<0.0009mg/KgTrichloroethene
02/17/22 13:190.0100.002<0.002mg/KgTrichlorofluoromethane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0007<0.0007mg/Kg1,2,3-Trichloropropane
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kg1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kg1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
02/17/22 13:190.0100.0005<0.0005mg/KgVinyl Acetate
02/17/22 13:190.0100.0005<0.0005mg/KgVinyl Chloride
02/17/22 13:190.0050.0005<0.0005mg/Kgo-Xylene
02/17/22 13:190.0100.001<0.001mg/Kgm,p-Xylene
02/17/22 13:194-Bromofluorobenzene (S)101 70-130
02/17/22 13:19Dibromofluoromethane (S)99.2 84-123
02/17/22 13:19Toluene-d8 (S)99.0 76-129
LCS-V15100 LCSD-V15100Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
0.081 81.083.30.0830.100mg/KgAcetone 29-198 2.7 20
Page 6 of 19Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 41 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8260D
V15101QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
5035 LOW
QC Prep:V15100
LCS-V15100 LCSD-V15100Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
0.089 89.290.10.0900.100mg/KgAcrolein 70-130 1.0 20
0.090 90.991.00.0910.100mg/KgAcrylonitrile 65-134 0.1 20
0.045 90.294.20.0470.050mg/KgBenzene 74-127 4.3 20
0.044 89.691.80.0450.050mg/KgBromobenzene 73-125 2.4 20
0.047 94.495.00.0470.050mg/KgBromochloromethane 72-134 0.6 20
0.047 94.696.40.0480.050mg/KgBromodichloromethane 75-122 1.8 20
0.048 96.496.80.0480.050mg/KgBromoform 66-135 0.4 20
0.049 99.61050.0520.050mg/KgBromomethane 20-180 5.6 20
0.043 87.091.60.0450.050mg/Kgn-Butylbenzene 65-135 5.1 20
0.043 86.289.60.0440.050mg/Kgsec-Butyl benzene 66-131 3.8 20
0.042 85.088.80.0440.050mg/Kgtert-Butyl benzene 67-132 4.3 20
0.042 84.087.60.0430.050mg/KgCarbon Disulfide 61-129 4.1 20
0.037 74.680.40.0400.050mg/KgCarbon Tetrachloride 64-143 7.4 20
0.046 92.294.20.0470.050mg/KgChlorobenzene 74-118 2.1 20
0.047 95.896.40.0480.050mg/KgChlorodibromomethane 73-122 0.6 20
0.047 95.299.00.0490.050mg/KgChloroethane 33-149 3.9 20
0.046 92.895.80.0470.050mg/KgChloroform 73-127 3.1 20
0.042 85.093.80.0460.050mg/KgChloromethane 45-143 9.8 20
0.045 90.292.00.0460.050mg/Kg2-Chlorotoluene 67-124 1.9 20
0.044 89.291.60.0450.050mg/Kg4-Chlorotoluene 71-126 2.6 20
0.046 92.094.40.0470.050mg/KgDi-Isopropyl Ether (DIPE)59-159 2.5 20
0.045 91.491.40.0450.050mg/Kg1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 55-157 0.0 20
0.046 93.494.40.0470.050mg/Kg1,2-Dibromoethane 70-132 1.0 20
0.046 93.694.80.0470.050mg/KgDibromomethane 74-133 1.2 20
0.046 92.494.40.0470.050mg/Kg1,2-Dichlorobenzene 72-123 2.1 20
0.045 90.894.00.0470.050mg/Kg1,3-Dichlorobenzene 71-120 3.4 20
Page 7 of 19Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 42 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8260D
V15101QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
5035 LOW
QC Prep:V15100
LCS-V15100 LCSD-V15100Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
0.045 91.693.40.0460.050mg/Kg1,4-Dichlorobenzene 71-123 1.9 20
0.038 77.882.60.0410.050mg/KgDichlorodifluoromethane 26-146 5.9 20
0.045 91.094.20.0470.050mg/Kg1,1-Dichloroethane 74-127 3.4 20
0.045 91.492.60.0460.050mg/Kg1,2-Dichloroethane 68-128 1.3 20
0.042 84.688.60.0440.050mg/Kg1,1-Dichloroethene 67-149 4.6 20
0.045 91.895.00.0470.050mg/Kgcis-1,2-Dichloroethene 76-134 3.4 20
0.043 87.491.40.0450.050mg/Kgtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene 73-132 4.4 20
0.046 92.094.60.0470.050mg/Kg1,2-Dichloropropane 73-130 2.7 20
0.045 91.693.40.0460.050mg/Kg1,3-Dichloropropane 75-124 1.9 20
0.042 85.890.60.0450.050mg/Kg2,2-Dichloropropane 50-142 5.4 20
0.042 84.489.00.0440.050mg/Kg1,1-Dichloropropene 71-130 5.3 20
0.046 93.096.00.0480.050mg/Kgcis-1,3-Dichloropropene 71-125 3.1 20
0.047 94.095.80.0470.050mg/Kgtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 68-123 1.8 20
1.17 93.693.61.171.25mg/KgEthanol 70-130 0.0 20
0.044 88.692.20.0460.050mg/KgEthylbenzene 74-128 3.9 20
0.078 78.683.40.0830.100mg/KgEthyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (ETBE)70-130 5.9 20
0.042 85.892.20.0460.050mg/KgHexachlorobutadiene 64-125 7.1 20
0.042 84.489.60.0440.050mg/Kgn-Hexane 70-130 5.9 20
0.043 86.088.20.0440.050mg/Kg2-Hexanone 61-157 2.5 20
0.043 86.290.00.0450.050mg/KgIsopropylbenzene 68-126 4.3 20
0.043 86.490.20.0450.050mg/Kg4-Isopropyl toluene 68-129 4.3 20
0.035 71.272.00.0360.050mg/KgMethyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)63-149 1.1 20
0.041 83.686.00.0430.050mg/KgMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)70-130 2.8 20
0.042 85.487.00.0430.050mg/Kg4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 57-162 1.8 20
0.045 90.893.00.0460.050mg/KgMethylene Chloride 74-129 2.3 20
0.045 91.694.60.0470.050mg/KgNaphthalene 57-157 3.2 20
Page 8 of 19Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 43 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8260D
V15101QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
5035 LOW
QC Prep:V15100
LCS-V15100 LCSD-V15100Laboratory Control Sample & LCSD
LCSD
ResultParameter Max
RPD
LCSD
% Rec
LCS
%Rec
LCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits RPD
0.043 86.489.20.0440.050mg/Kgn-Propylbenzene 67-130 3.1 20
0.048 97.61000.0500.050mg/KgStyrene 77-121 2.4 20
0.046 92.293.20.0460.050mg/Kg1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 72-115 1.0 20
0.044 88.890.40.0450.050mg/Kg1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 56-126 1.7 20
0.043 86.089.60.0440.050mg/KgTetrachloroethene 68-130 4.1 20
0.045 90.293.60.0460.050mg/KgToluene 71-129 3.6 20
0.046 92.896.80.0480.050mg/Kg1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 68-130 4.2 20
0.046 93.697.60.0480.050mg/Kg1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 66-125 4.1 20
0.043 86.690.60.0450.050mg/Kg1,1,1-Trichloroethane 67-131 4.5 20
0.046 93.494.80.0470.050mg/Kg1,1,2-Trichloroethane 70-133 1.4 20
0.044 89.694.20.0470.050mg/KgTrichloroethene 75-133 5.0 20
0.044 89.495.40.0470.050mg/KgTrichlorofluoromethane 44-146 6.4 20
0.044 88.689.40.0440.050mg/Kg1,2,3-Trichloropropane 60-137 0.8 20
0.044 89.092.40.0460.050mg/Kg1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 69-129 3.7 20
0.044 88.291.40.0450.050mg/Kg1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 69-128 3.5 20
0.047 94.692.80.0460.050mg/KgVinyl Acetate 60-140 1.9 20
0.042 84.689.20.0440.050mg/KgVinyl Chloride 48-147 5.2 20
0.045 91.294.20.0470.050mg/Kgo-Xylene 74-126 3.2 20
0.089 89.893.60.0930.100mg/Kgm,p-Xylene 75-124 4.1 20
98.098.44-Bromofluorobenzene (S)70-130
99.099.6Dibromofluoromethane (S)84-123
10099.2Toluene-d8 (S)76-129
Page 9 of 19Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 44 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Semivolatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8270E
V15214,V15323QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
3546
QC Prep:V15151
Associated Lab Samples: 94336, 94337
LRB-V15151 Matrix: SOLLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
02/21/22 14:560.6600.116<0.116mg/KgAcenaphthene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.105<0.105mg/KgAcenaphthylene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.152<0.152mg/KgAniline
02/21/22 14:560.6600.143<0.143mg/KgAnthracene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.139<0.139mg/KgBenzo(a)anthracene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.147<0.147mg/KgBenzo(a)pyrene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.146<0.146mg/KgBenzo(b)fluoranthene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.136<0.136mg/KgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.137<0.137mg/KgBenzo(k)fluoranthene
02/21/22 14:562.000.580<0.580mg/KgBenzoic Acid
02/21/22 14:560.6600.105<0.105mg/KgBenzyl alcohol
02/21/22 14:560.6600.118<0.118mg/KgBis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
02/21/22 14:560.6600.107<0.107mg/KgBis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
02/21/22 14:560.3300.136<0.136mg/KgBis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
02/21/22 14:560.6600.120<0.120mg/KgBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
02/21/22 14:560.6600.109<0.109mg/Kg4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
02/21/22 14:560.3300.113<0.113mg/KgButyl benzyl phthalate
02/21/22 14:560.6600.092<0.092mg/Kg4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
02/21/22 14:560.3300.112<0.112mg/Kg4-Chloroaniline
02/21/22 14:560.6600.116<0.116mg/Kg2-Chloronaphthalene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.098<0.098mg/Kg2-Chlorophenol
02/21/22 14:561.000.126<0.126mg/Kg4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
02/21/22 14:560.6600.142<0.142mg/KgChrysene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.230<0.230mg/KgDibenz(a,h)anthracene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.119<0.119mg/KgDibenzofuran
02/21/22 14:560.6600.094<0.094mg/Kg1,2-Dichlorobenzene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.097<0.097mg/Kg1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Page 10 of 19Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 45 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Semivolatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8270E
V15214,V15323QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
3546
QC Prep:V15151
Associated Lab Samples: 94336, 94337
LRB-V15151 Matrix: SOLLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
02/21/22 14:560.3300.097<0.097mg/Kg1,4-Dichlorobenzene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.147<0.147mg/Kg3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
02/21/22 14:560.6600.095<0.095mg/Kg2,4-Dichlorophenol
02/21/22 14:560.6600.180<0.180mg/KgDiethyl phthalate
02/21/22 14:560.6600.174<0.174mg/KgDimethyl phthalate
02/21/22 14:560.3300.108<0.108mg/Kg2,4-Dimethylphenol
02/21/22 14:560.6600.107<0.107mg/KgDi-n-butyl phthalate
02/21/22 14:561.500.240<0.240mg/Kg4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
02/21/22 14:561.500.520<0.520mg/Kg2,4-Dinitrophenol
02/21/22 14:560.6600.096<0.096mg/Kg2,4-Dinitrotoluene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.108<0.108mg/Kg2,6-Dinitrotoluene
02/21/22 14:560.3300.143<0.143mg/KgDi-n-Octyl Phthalate
02/21/22 14:560.6600.123<0.123mg/KgFluoranthene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.128<0.128mg/KgFluorene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.106<0.106mg/KgHexachlorobenzene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.097<0.097mg/KgHexachlorobutadiene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.157<0.157mg/KgHexachlorocyclopentadiene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.079<0.079mg/KgHexachloroethane
02/21/22 14:560.6600.179<0.179mg/KgIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.191<0.191mg/KgIsophorone
02/21/22 14:560.6600.106<0.106mg/Kg1-Methylnaphthalene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.100<0.100mg/Kg2-Methylnaphthalene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.097<0.097mg/Kg2-Methylphenol
02/21/22 14:560.6600.084<0.084mg/Kg3&4 Methylphenol
02/21/22 14:560.6600.144<0.144mg/KgNaphthalene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.096<0.096mg/Kg2-Nitroaniline
02/21/22 14:560.6600.120<0.120mg/Kg3-Nitroaniline
Page 11 of 19Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 46 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Semivolatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8270E
V15214,V15323QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
3546
QC Prep:V15151
Associated Lab Samples: 94336, 94337
LRB-V15151 Matrix: SOLLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
02/21/22 14:560.3300.093<0.093mg/Kg4-Nitroaniline
02/21/22 14:560.3300.116<0.116mg/KgNitrobenzene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.088<0.088mg/Kg2-Nitrophenol
02/21/22 14:560.6600.117<0.117mg/Kg4-Nitrophenol
02/21/22 14:560.6600.263<0.263mg/KgN-Nitrosodimethylamine
02/21/22 14:560.6600.181<0.181mg/KgN-Nitrosodiphenylamine
02/21/22 14:560.6600.118<0.118mg/KgN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
02/21/22 14:561.000.347<0.347mg/KgPentachlorophenol
02/21/22 14:560.6600.208<0.208mg/KgPhenanthrene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.112<0.112mg/KgPhenol
02/21/22 14:560.6600.134<0.134mg/KgPyrene
02/21/22 14:560.3300.079<0.079mg/KgPyridine
02/21/22 14:560.6600.107<0.107mg/Kg1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
02/21/22 14:560.6600.096<0.096mg/Kg2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
02/21/22 14:560.6600.096<0.096mg/Kg2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
02/21/22 14:562-Fluorobiphenyl (S)70.0 44-115
02/21/22 14:562-Fluorophenol (S)67.5 35-115
02/21/22 14:56Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)65.2 37-122
02/21/22 14:564-Terphenyl-d14 (S)79.6 54-127
02/21/22 14:562,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)71.4 39-132
02/21/22 14:56Phenol-d5 (S)68.1 34-121
LCS-V15151Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
79.01.321.67mg/KgAcenaphthene 40-123
82.01.371.67mg/KgAcenaphthylene 32-132
Page 12 of 19Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 47 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Semivolatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8270E
V15214,V15323QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
3546
QC Prep:V15151
LCS-V15151Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
88.61.481.67mg/KgAniline 12-197
82.01.371.67mg/KgAnthracene 47-123
79.01.321.67mg/KgBenzo(a)anthracene 49-126
96.41.611.67mg/KgBenzo(a)pyrene 45-129
85.01.421.67mg/KgBenzo(b)fluoranthene 45-132
78.41.311.67mg/KgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 43-134
82.01.371.67mg/KgBenzo(k)fluoranthene 47-132
0.0*1.061.67mg/KgBenzoic Acid 10-83
74.81.251.67mg/KgBenzyl alcohol 29-122
82.61.381.67mg/KgBis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 36-121
75.41.261.67mg/KgBis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 31-120
74.81.251.67mg/KgBis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 33-131
90.41.511.67mg/KgBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 51-133
82.61.381.67mg/Kg4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 46-124
89.81.501.67mg/KgButyl benzyl phthalate 48-132
78.41.311.67mg/Kg4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 45-122
63.41.061.67mg/Kg4-Chloroaniline 17-106
78.41.311.67mg/Kg2-Chloronaphthalene 41-114
80.21.341.67mg/Kg2-Chlorophenol 34-121
79.01.321.67mg/Kg4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 45-121
80.81.351.67mg/KgChrysene 50-124
69.41.161.67mg/KgDibenz(a,h)anthracene 45-134
79.01.321.67mg/KgDibenzofuran 44-120
65.81.101.67mg/Kg1,2-Dichlorobenzene 33-117
67.01.121.67mg/Kg1,3-Dichlorobenzene 30-115
63.41.061.67mg/Kg1,4-Dichlorobenzene 31-115
53.40.8921.67mg/Kg3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 22-121
Page 13 of 19* QC Fail Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 48 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Semivolatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8270E
V15214,V15323QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
3546
QC Prep:V15151
LCS-V15151Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
76.01.271.67mg/Kg2,4-Dichlorophenol 40-122
79.61.331.67mg/KgDiethyl phthalate 50-124
78.41.311.67mg/KgDimethyl phthalate 48-124
82.01.371.67mg/Kg2,4-Dimethylphenol 30-127
87.41.461.67mg/KgDi-n-butyl phthalate 51-128
0.0*1.301.67mg/Kg4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 29-132
0.0*1.291.67mg/Kg2,4-Dinitrophenol 27-129
85.61.431.67mg/Kg2,4-Dinitrotoluene 48-126
86.81.451.67mg/Kg2,6-Dinitrotoluene 46-124
89.81.501.67mg/KgDi-n-Octyl Phthalate 45-140
80.21.341.67mg/KgFluoranthene 50-127
79.61.331.67mg/KgFluorene 43-125
80.81.351.67mg/KgHexachlorobenzene 45-122
66.41.111.67mg/KgHexachlorobutadiene 32-123
61.01.021.67mg/KgHexachlorocyclopentadiene 32-117
71.21.191.67mg/KgHexachloroethane 28-117
78.41.311.67mg/KgIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 45-133
67.61.131.67mg/KgIsophorone 30-122
68.81.151.67mg/Kg1-Methylnaphthalene 40-119
68.81.151.67mg/Kg2-Methylnaphthalene 38-122
77.81.301.67mg/Kg2-Methylphenol 32-122
74.81.251.67mg/Kg3&4 Methylphenol 34-119
64.61.081.67mg/KgNaphthalene 35-123
83.81.401.67mg/Kg2-Nitroaniline 44-127
79.61.331.67mg/Kg3-Nitroaniline 33-119
77.21.291.67mg/Kg4-Nitroaniline 63-147
67.01.121.67mg/KgNitrobenzene 34-122
Page 14 of 19* QC Fail Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 49 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Semivolatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8270E
V15214,V15323QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
3546
QC Prep:V15151
LCS-V15151Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
69.41.161.67mg/Kg2-Nitrophenol 36-123
85.61.431.67mg/Kg4-Nitrophenol 30-132
41.20.6891.67mg/KgN-Nitrosodimethylamine 10-146
98.81.651.67mg/KgN-Nitrosodiphenylamine 38-127
80.21.341.67mg/KgN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 36-120
1051.761.67mg/KgPentachlorophenol 25-133
81.41.361.67mg/KgPhenanthrene 50-121
77.21.291.67mg/KgPhenol 34-121
85.01.421.67mg/KgPyrene 47-127
34.40.5751.67mg/KgPyridine 10-80
64.61.081.67mg/Kg1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 34-118
80.81.351.67mg/Kg2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 41-124
83.21.391.67mg/Kg2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 39-126
69.42-Fluorobiphenyl (S)44-115
69.92-Fluorophenol (S)35-115
58.0Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)37-122
74.84-Terphenyl-d14 (S)54-127
73.52,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)39-132
67.2Phenol-d5 (S)34-121
V 94192-MS-V15151 V 94192-MSD-V15151Matrix Spike & Matrix Spike Duplicate
MS Result
Parameter
Max
RPD
MS
%Rec
MSD
Result
MSD
Spike
Conc.
MS Spike
Conc.ResultUnits
%Rec
Limits
MSD
%Rec RPD
0.413 0.0*1.571.671.67<0.580mg/KgAcenaphthene 94.0 40-123 81.6*20
0.566 0.0*1.371.671.67<0.525mg/KgAcenaphthylene 82.0 32-132 69.9*20
0.616 0.0*0.5431.671.67<0.760mg/KgAniline 0.0*12-197 0.0 20
Page 15 of 19* QC Fail Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 50 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Semivolatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8270E
V15214,V15323QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
3546
QC Prep:V15151
V 94192-MS-V15151 V 94192-MSD-V15151Matrix Spike & Matrix Spike Duplicate
MS Result
Parameter
Max
RPD
MS
%Rec
MSD
Result
MSD
Spike
Conc.
MS Spike
Conc.ResultUnits
%Rec
Limits
MSD
%Rec RPD
4.28 256*3.511.671.67<0.715mg/KgAnthracene 210*47-123 19.7 20
1.15 68.81.161.671.67<0.695mg/KgBenzo(a)anthracene 69.4 49-126 0.8 20
1.29 77.21.331.671.67<0.735mg/KgBenzo(a)pyrene 79.6 45-129 3.0 20
1.16 69.41.211.671.67<0.730mg/KgBenzo(b)fluoranthene 72.4 45-132 4.2 20
1.53 91.61.121.671.67<0.680mg/KgBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 67.0 43-134 30.9*20
1.08 64.61.111.671.67<0.685mg/KgBenzo(k)fluoranthene 66.4 47-132 2.7 20
0.784 0.0*1.121.671.67<2.90mg/KgBenzoic Acid 0.0*10-83 0.0 20
1.08 64.61.061.671.67<0.525mg/KgBenzyl alcohol 63.4 29-122 1.8 20
1.23 73.61.171.671.67<0.590mg/KgBis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane 70.0 36-121 5.0 20
1.10 65.81.071.671.67<0.535mg/KgBis(2-Chloroethyl)ether 64.0 31-120 2.7 20
0.729 43.60.6271.671.67<0.680mg/KgBis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 37.5 33-131 15.0 20
1.31 78.41.331.671.67<0.600mg/KgBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 79.6 51-133 1.5 20
1.31 78.41.601.671.67<0.545mg/Kg4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 95.8 46-124 19.9 20
1.09 65.21.281.671.67<0.565mg/KgButyl benzyl phthalate 76.6 48-132 16.0 20
2.13 128*1.331.671.67<0.462mg/Kg4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 79.6 45-122 46.2*20
0.908 54.30.9801.671.67<0.560mg/Kg4-Chloroaniline 58.6 17-106 7.6 20
<0.116 0.0*1.111.671.67<0.580mg/Kg2-Chloronaphthalene 66.4 41-114 50.8*20
0.826 49.40.8461.671.67<0.491mg/Kg2-Chlorophenol 50.6 34-121 2.3 20
1.14 68.21.071.671.67<0.630mg/Kg4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 64.0 45-121 6.3 20
1.15 68.81.101.671.67<0.710mg/KgChrysene 65.8 50-124 4.4 20
1.29 77.21.351.671.67<1.15mg/KgDibenz(a,h)anthracene 80.8 45-134 4.5 20
<0.119 0.0*<0.1191.671.67<0.595mg/KgDibenzofuran 0.0*44-120 0.0 20
0.945 56.50.9161.671.67<0.472mg/Kg1,2-Dichlorobenzene 54.8 33-117 3.1 20
0.918 54.90.8881.671.67<0.487mg/Kg1,3-Dichlorobenzene 53.1 30-115 3.3 20
0.936 56.00.9151.671.67<0.488mg/Kg1,4-Dichlorobenzene 54.7 31-115 2.2 20
0.291 0.0*0.2941.671.67<0.735mg/Kg3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 0.0*22-121 0.0 20
Page 16 of 19* QC Fail Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 51 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Semivolatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8270E
V15214,V15323QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
3546
QC Prep:V15151
V 94192-MS-V15151 V 94192-MSD-V15151Matrix Spike & Matrix Spike Duplicate
MS Result
Parameter
Max
RPD
MS
%Rec
MSD
Result
MSD
Spike
Conc.
MS Spike
Conc.ResultUnits
%Rec
Limits
MSD
%Rec RPD
1.12 67.01.061.671.67<0.479mg/Kg2,4-Dichlorophenol 63.4 40-122 5.5 20
<0.180 0.0*1.071.671.67<0.900mg/KgDiethyl phthalate 64.0 50-124 47.3*20
<0.174 0.0*0.9691.671.67<0.870mg/KgDimethyl phthalate 58.0 48-124 37.9*30
1.58 94.61.031.671.67<0.540mg/Kg2,4-Dimethylphenol 61.6 30-127 42.1*20
1.27 76.01.271.671.67<0.535mg/KgDi-n-butyl phthalate 76.0 51-128 0.0 20
0.661 0.0*0.6811.671.67<1.20mg/Kg4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 0.0*29-132 0.0 20
<0.520 0.0*0.8031.671.67<2.60mg/Kg2,4-Dinitrophenol 0.0*27-129 0.0 20
0.638 0.0*1.411.671.67<0.483mg/Kg2,4-Dinitrotoluene 84.4 48-126 72.4*20
1.51 90.41.351.671.67<0.540mg/Kg2,6-Dinitrotoluene 80.8 46-124 11.1 20
1.79 1071.251.671.67<0.715mg/KgDi-n-Octyl Phthalate 74.8 45-140 35.5*20
1.56 93.41.441.671.67<0.615mg/KgFluoranthene 86.2 50-127 8.0 20
<0.128 0.0*2.111.671.672.54mg/KgFluorene -24*43-125 105*20
1.51 90.41.381.671.67<0.530mg/KgHexachlorobenzene 82.6 45-122 8.9 20
1.27 76.01.251.671.67<0.488mg/KgHexachlorobutadiene 74.8 32-123 1.5 20
0.708 42.30.7381.671.67<0.785mg/KgHexachlorocyclopentadiene 44.1 32-117 4.1 20
4.24 254*2.871.671.67<0.396mg/KgHexachloroethane 172*28-117 38.5*20
1.54 92.21.521.671.67<0.895mg/KgIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 91.0 45-133 1.3 20
1.95 1171.041.671.67<0.955mg/KgIsophorone 62.2 30-122 60.8*20
8.88 -170*5.761.671.6711.8mg/Kg1-Methylnaphthalene -360*40-119 42.6*20
13.2 -320*8.621.671.6718.8mg/Kg2-Methylnaphthalene -590*38-122 41.9*20
0.946 56.60.8651.671.67<0.485mg/Kg2-Methylphenol 51.7 32-122 8.9 20
0.840 50.20.6201.671.67<0.425mg/Kg3&4 Methylphenol 0.0*34-119 24.0*20
3.88 -59*3.071.671.674.87mg/KgNaphthalene -90*35-123 23.3*20
0.817 48.93.291.671.67<0.484mg/Kg2-Nitroaniline 197*44-127 120*20
0.826 49.40.7911.671.67<0.600mg/Kg3-Nitroaniline 47.3 33-119 4.3 20
0.097 0.0*1.531.671.67<0.467mg/Kg4-Nitroaniline 91.6 63-147 129*20
Page 17 of 19* QC Fail Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 52 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
QC Prep Batch Method:
Semivolatile Organic Compounds - GC/MS
8270E
V15214,V15323QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
3546
QC Prep:V15151
V 94192-MS-V15151 V 94192-MSD-V15151Matrix Spike & Matrix Spike Duplicate
MS Result
Parameter
Max
RPD
MS
%Rec
MSD
Result
MSD
Spike
Conc.
MS Spike
Conc.ResultUnits
%Rec
Limits
MSD
%Rec RPD
1.10 65.80.7151.671.67<0.580mg/KgNitrobenzene 42.8 34-122 42.4*20
1.85 1111.071.671.67<0.444mg/Kg2-Nitrophenol 64.0 32-123 53.4*20
0.720 43.11.381.671.67<0.585mg/Kg4-Nitrophenol 82.6 30-132 62.8*20
0.448 0.0*0.5231.671.67<1.32mg/KgN-Nitrosodimethylamine 0.0*10-146 0.0 30
5.65 338*4.731.671.67<0.905mg/KgN-Nitrosodiphenylamine 283*38-127 17.7 20
1.63 97.60.6341.671.67<0.590mg/KgN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 0.0*36-120 84.7*20
1.52 91.01.541.671.67<1.74mg/KgPentachlorophenol 92.2 25-133 1.3 20
4.11 -61*3.331.671.675.13mg/KgPhenanthrene -90*50-121 20.9*20
1.20 71.81.081.671.67<0.560mg/KgPhenol 64.6 34-121 10.5 20
1.79 1071.651.671.671.49mg/KgPyrene 9.5*47-127 8.1 20
0.175 0.0*0.2551.671.67<0.396mg/KgPyridine 0.0*10-80 0.0 20
1.00 59.81.031.671.67<0.535mg/Kg1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 61.6 34-118 2.9 20
0.411 0.0*1.281.671.67<0.481mg/Kg2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 76.6 41-124 63.9*20
1.52 91.01.451.671.67<0.483mg/Kg2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 86.8 39-126 4.7 20
71.82-Fluorobiphenyl (S)70.0 44-115
61.52-Fluorophenol (S)62.7 35-115
104Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)73.0 37-122
60.44-Terphenyl-d14 (S)65.8 54-127
90.02,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)93.9 39-132
61.5Phenol-d5 (S)57.9 34-121
Page 18 of 19* QC Fail Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 53 of 56
Quality Control Data
22-048-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
ACO-002
Dry Weight Determination
SW-DRYWT
V15195QC Analytical Batch:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
V 94189-DUPDuplicate
Max RPD
Parameter
AnalyzedRPDDUP
Result
Result
Units
20.0 02/21/22 15:351.223.923.6%Moisture
Page 19 of 19Date:03/01/2022 03:38 PM
Page 54 of 56
Fed Ex
UPS
US Postal
Client
Lab
Courier
Other :
Shipment Receipt Form
Customer Number:
Customer Name:
Report Number:22-048-0004
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
01102
Shipping Method
Shipping container/cooler uncompromised?
Thermometer ID:IRT 15 3.2
Chain of Custody (COC) present?Yes No
Yes No Not Present
Yes No Not Present
Yes No
COC agrees with sample label(s)? Yes No
COC properly completed
Samples in proper containers?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)?
All samples received within holding time?
Cooler temperature in compliance?
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes NoCooler/Samples arrived at the laboratory on ice.
Samples were considered acceptable as cooling
process had begun.
Yes No
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/ASoil VOA method 5035 – compliance criteria met
Water - Sample containers properly preserved
Water - VOA vials free of headspace Yes No N/A
Trip Blanks received with VOAs
ü
Low concentration EnCore samplers (48 hr)
High concentration pre-weighed (methanol -14 d) Low conc pre-weighed vials (Sod Bis -14 d)ü
High concentration container (48 hr)
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Number of coolers/boxes received
Yes No
1
Signature:Angela D Overcash Date & Time:02/17/2022 12:16:17
Special precautions or instructions included?
Comments:
Page 55 of 56
Page 56 of 56

Laboratory's liability in any claim relating to analyses performed shall be limited to, at laboratory's option, repeating the
analysis in question at laboratory's expense, or the refund of the charges paid for performance of said analysis.

2/25/2022
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte) Haley Martin
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100 Charlotte, NC, 28203
Ref: Analytical Testing
Lab Report Number: 22-049-0004 Client Project Description: Harrelson Ford
ACO-002
Dear Haley Martin:
Waypoint Analytical, LLC (Charlotte) received sample(s) on 2/18/2022 for the analyses presented in the following report.
The above referenced project has been analyzed per your instructions. The analyses were performed in
accordance with the applicable analytical method.
The analytical data has been validated using standard quality control measures performed as required by the analytical method. Quality Assurance, method validations, instrumentation maintenance and calibration for all
parameters were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the USEPA (including 40 CFR 136 Method Update Rule May 2021) unless otherwise indicated. Certain parameters (chlorine, pH, dissolved oxygen, sulfite...) are required to be analyzed within 15 minutes of
sampling. Usually, but not always, any field parameter analyzed at the laboratory is outside of this holding time. Refer to sample analysis time for confirmation of holding time compliance.
The results are shown on the attached Report of Analysis(s). Results for solid matrices are reported on an as-
received basis unless otherwise indicated. This report shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the samples included in this report. Please do not hesitate to contact me or client services if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Angela D Overcash Senior Project Manager
Page 1 of 52
Certification Summary
Laboratory ID: WP CNC: Waypoint Analytical Carolina, Inc. (C), Charlotte, NC
State Program Lab ID Expiration Date
07/31/202237735State ProgramNorth Carolina
12/31/2022402State ProgramNorth Carolina
07/31/202299012State ProgramSouth Carolina
12/31/202199012State ProgramSouth Carolina
Page 1 of 1 00016/22-049-0004
Page 2 of 52
Report Number:
Sample Summary Table
Client Project Description:
22-049-0004
Harrelson Ford
ACO-002
Lab No Client Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received
02/16/2022 12:20Air 94422 SSV-2 02/18/2022 10:53
02/16/2022Air 94423 SSV-DUP 02/18/2022 10:53
02/16/2022 14:55Air 94424 SSV-6 02/18/2022 10:53
02/17/2022 14:27Air 94425 SSV-5 02/18/2022 10:53
02/17/2022 13:42Air 94426 SG-16 02/18/2022 10:53
02/16/2022 14:09Air 94427 SSV-4 02/18/2022 10:53
02/17/2022 13:04Air 94428 SSV-1 02/18/2022 10:53
02/16/2022 13:32Air 94429 SSV-3 02/18/2022 10:53
Page 3 of 52
Summary of Detected Analytes
QualifiersAnalyzedUnitsResult
Report Number:
Client Sample ID
Method Parameters
Lab Sample ID
22-049-0004
Report Limit
Project:Harrelson Ford
V 94422SSV-2
38.9 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 Acetone µg/m3 0.202
J0.262 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 Benzene µg/m3 0.0733
J2.29 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 Carbon Disulfide µg/m3 0.0608
2.79 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 Dichlorodifluoromethane µg/m3 0.134
J1.03 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 1,4-Dioxane µg/m3 0.435
J0.395 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 Ethylbenzene µg/m3 0.106
3.23 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 2-Hexanone µg/m3 0.285
22.8 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 Isopropyl Alchohol µg/m3 0.139
4.93 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)µg/m3 0.224
J0.508 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone µg/m3 0.121
J0.750 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 Methylene Chloride µg/m3 0.489
J0.430 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 Styrene µg/m3 0.124
6670 02/22/2022 21:40TO-15 Tetrachloroethene µg/m3 9.07
2.03 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 Toluene µg/m3 0.0901
J1.86 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane µg/m3 0.144
J1.54 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 Trichloroethene µg/m3 0.199
J1.12 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 Trichlorofluoromethane µg/m3 0.130
J1.22 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.110
J0.734 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 o-Xylene µg/m3 0.157
J1.55 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 m,p-Xylene µg/m3 0.217
J2.28 02/22/2022 23:10TO-15 Xylene (Total)µg/m3 0.157
V 94423SSV-DUP
42.6 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 Acetone µg/m3 0.202
J0.303 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 Benzene µg/m3 0.0733
J2.25 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 Carbon Disulfide µg/m3 0.0608
4.69 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 Cyclohexane µg/m3 0.161
2.75 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 Dichlorodifluoromethane µg/m3 0.134
J0.951 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 1,4-Dioxane µg/m3 0.435
J0.399 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 Ethylbenzene µg/m3 0.106
3.22 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 2-Hexanone µg/m3 0.285
23.1 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 Isopropyl Alchohol µg/m3 0.139
5.71 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)µg/m3 0.224
J0.750 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 Methylene Chloride µg/m3 0.489
J0.405 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 Styrene µg/m3 0.124
6440 02/22/2022 22:18TO-15 Tetrachloroethene µg/m3 9.07
J0.779 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 Tetrahydrofuran µg/m3 0.107
Page 4 of 52
Summary of Detected Analytes
QualifiersAnalyzedUnitsResult
Report Number:
Client Sample ID
Method Parameters
Lab Sample ID
22-049-0004
Report Limit
Project:Harrelson Ford
V 94423SSV-DUP
J1.82 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 Toluene µg/m3 0.0901
J1.84 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 1,1,1-Trichloroethane µg/m3 0.144
J1.50 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 Trichloroethene µg/m3 0.199
J1.11 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 Trichlorofluoromethane µg/m3 0.130
J1.33 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.110
J0.677 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 o-Xylene µg/m3 0.157
J1.48 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 m,p-Xylene µg/m3 0.217
J2.16 02/23/2022 00:01TO-15 Xylene (Total)µg/m3 0.157
V 94424SSV-6
398 02/19/2022 07:22TO-15 Acetone µg/m3 4.04
J0.393 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 Benzene µg/m3 0.0733
J3.86 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 Carbon Disulfide µg/m3 0.0608
J0.425 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 Chloroform µg/m3 0.0864
8.80 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 Cyclohexane µg/m3 0.161
J1.67 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 1,4-Dichlorobenzene µg/m3 0.186
2.62 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 Dichlorodifluoromethane µg/m3 0.134
J1.13 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene µg/m3 0.0955
J0.903 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 Ethylbenzene µg/m3 0.106
J0.600 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 4-Ethyltoluene µg/m3 0.128
J1.14 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 Heptane µg/m3 0.143
3.93 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 2-Hexanone µg/m3 0.285
61.2 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 Isopropyl Alchohol µg/m3 0.139
15.9 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)µg/m3 0.224
4.48 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone µg/m3 0.121
J0.938 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 Methylene Chloride µg/m3 0.489
J0.835 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 Styrene µg/m3 0.124
647 02/19/2022 07:22TO-15 Tetrachloroethene µg/m3 3.62
7.22 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 Toluene µg/m3 0.0901
26.9 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 Trichloroethene µg/m3 0.199
J1.33 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 Trichlorofluoromethane µg/m3 0.130
2.91 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.110
J0.732 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.236
J1.61 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 o-Xylene µg/m3 0.157
J3.55 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 m,p-Xylene µg/m3 0.217
J5.16 02/22/2022 16:52TO-15 Xylene (Total)µg/m3 0.157
Page 5 of 52
Summary of Detected Analytes
QualifiersAnalyzedUnitsResult
Report Number:
Client Sample ID
Method Parameters
Lab Sample ID
22-049-0004
Report Limit
Project:Harrelson Ford
V 94425SSV-5
J24.4 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 Acetone µg/m3 4.04
35.9 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 Benzene µg/m3 1.46
22.1 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 1,3-Butadiene µg/m3 6.53
J25.9 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 Carbon Disulfide µg/m3 1.22
J12.1 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 Chloroethane µg/m3 3.28
72.0 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 Cyclohexane µg/m3 3.22
13500 02/22/2022 17:30TO-15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene µg/m3 9.54
132 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene µg/m3 2.16
61.6 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 Ethylbenzene µg/m3 2.12
J11.4 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 4-Ethyltoluene µg/m3 2.56
J23.8 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 Heptane µg/m3 2.86
50.3 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 n-Hexane µg/m3 0.943
J7.67 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 Isopropyl Alchohol µg/m3 2.78
J9.73 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)µg/m3 4.48
252 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)µg/m3 0.673
393 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 Propene µg/m3 4.84
J32.2 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 Tetrachloroethene µg/m3 3.62
224 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 Toluene µg/m3 1.80
11700 02/22/2022 17:30TO-15 Vinyl Chloride µg/m3 12.7
74.6 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 o-Xylene µg/m3 3.14
227 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 m,p-Xylene µg/m3 4.34
302 02/19/2022 08:01TO-15 Xylene (Total)µg/m3 3.14
V 94426SG-16
72.5 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Acetone µg/m3 0.202
20.9 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Benzene µg/m3 0.0733
12.0 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Carbon Disulfide µg/m3 0.0608
J1.26 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Carbon Tetrachloride µg/m3 0.155
J0.977 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Chloromethane µg/m3 0.0673
21.1 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Cyclohexane µg/m3 0.161
3.16 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Dichlorodifluoromethane µg/m3 0.134
15.8 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Ethylbenzene µg/m3 0.106
J1.96 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 4-Ethyltoluene µg/m3 0.128
J1.12 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane µg/m3 0.561
26.1 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Heptane µg/m3 0.143
57.0 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 n-Hexane µg/m3 0.0472
15.6 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)µg/m3 0.224
Page 6 of 52
Summary of Detected Analytes
QualifiersAnalyzedUnitsResult
Report Number:
Client Sample ID
Method Parameters
Lab Sample ID
22-049-0004
Report Limit
Project:Harrelson Ford
V 94426SG-16
3.56 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone µg/m3 0.121
2.17 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Methylene Chloride µg/m3 0.489
2.91 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Naphthalene µg/m3 0.183
152 02/25/2022 11:39TO-15 Propene µg/m3 1.21
J1.58 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Styrene µg/m3 0.124
J2.44 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Tetrachloroethene µg/m3 0.181
1.57 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Tetrahydrofuran µg/m3 0.107
259 02/25/2022 11:39TO-15 Toluene µg/m3 0.450
J2.57 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Trichlorofluoromethane µg/m3 0.130
5.67 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.110
J1.97 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.236
15.2 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 o-Xylene µg/m3 0.157
55.0 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 m,p-Xylene µg/m3 0.217
70.2 02/22/2022 18:24TO-15 Xylene (Total)µg/m3 0.157
V 94427SSV-4
33.1 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 Acetone µg/m3 0.202
J0.326 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 Benzene µg/m3 0.0733
J1.93 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 Carbon Disulfide µg/m3 0.0608
6.81 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 Cyclohexane µg/m3 0.161
2.76 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 Dichlorodifluoromethane µg/m3 0.134
J0.577 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 Ethylbenzene µg/m3 0.106
3.50 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 2-Hexanone µg/m3 0.285
JB2.11 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 Isopropyl Alchohol µg/m3 0.139
3.35 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)µg/m3 0.224
J1.01 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone µg/m3 0.121
J0.986 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 Methylene Chloride µg/m3 0.489
2.70 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 Naphthalene µg/m3 0.183
J0.575 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 Styrene µg/m3 0.124
J3.37 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 Tetrachloroethene µg/m3 0.181
J0.457 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 Tetrahydrofuran µg/m3 0.107
2.72 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 Toluene µg/m3 0.0901
J1.43 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 Trichlorofluoromethane µg/m3 0.130
J1.68 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.110
J0.408 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.236
J1.15 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 o-Xylene µg/m3 0.157
J2.19 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 m,p-Xylene µg/m3 0.217
Page 7 of 52
Summary of Detected Analytes
QualifiersAnalyzedUnitsResult
Report Number:
Client Sample ID
Method Parameters
Lab Sample ID
22-049-0004
Report Limit
Project:Harrelson Ford
V 94427SSV-4
J3.34 02/22/2022 19:16TO-15 Xylene (Total)µg/m3 0.157
V 94428SSV-1
30.1 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 Acetone µg/m3 0.202
J0.588 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 Benzene µg/m3 0.0733
J2.06 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 Carbon Disulfide µg/m3 0.0608
12.1 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 Chloroform µg/m3 0.0864
5.42 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 Cyclohexane µg/m3 0.161
2.77 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 Dichlorodifluoromethane µg/m3 0.134
1.86 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 1,4-Dioxane µg/m3 0.435
J1.18 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 Ethylbenzene µg/m3 0.106
J0.555 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 4-Ethyltoluene µg/m3 0.128
J0.750 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 Heptane µg/m3 0.143
J0.779 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 n-Hexane µg/m3 0.0472
4.99 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 Isopropyl Alchohol µg/m3 0.139
1.70 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)µg/m3 0.224
J0.841 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 Methylene Chloride µg/m3 0.489
2.81 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 Naphthalene µg/m3 0.183
J0.596 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 Styrene µg/m3 0.124
523 02/19/2022 10:44TO-15 Tetrachloroethene µg/m3 3.62
5.18 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 Toluene µg/m3 0.0901
J1.65 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 Trichlorofluoromethane µg/m3 0.130
2.81 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.110
J0.703 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.236
J1.97 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 o-Xylene µg/m3 0.157
J4.45 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 m,p-Xylene µg/m3 0.217
J6.42 02/22/2022 20:10TO-15 Xylene (Total)µg/m3 0.157
V 94429SSV-3
33.5 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 Acetone µg/m3 0.202
J0.668 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 Benzene µg/m3 0.0733
J0.532 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 Carbon Disulfide µg/m3 0.0608
6.91 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 Cyclohexane µg/m3 0.161
2.72 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 Dichlorodifluoromethane µg/m3 0.134
4.04 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 1,4-Dioxane µg/m3 0.435
J2.09 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 Ethylbenzene µg/m3 0.106
J0.777 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 4-Ethyltoluene µg/m3 0.128
J0.533 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 Heptane µg/m3 0.143
Page 8 of 52
Summary of Detected Analytes
QualifiersAnalyzedUnitsResult
Report Number:
Client Sample ID
Method Parameters
Lab Sample ID
22-049-0004
Report Limit
Project:Harrelson Ford
V 94429SSV-3
J1.10 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 n-Hexane µg/m3 0.0472
3.28 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 2-Hexanone µg/m3 0.285
21.6 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 Isopropyl Alchohol µg/m3 0.139
2.94 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)µg/m3 0.224
J1.18 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone µg/m3 0.121
J0.604 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 Methylene Chloride µg/m3 0.489
2.75 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 Naphthalene µg/m3 0.183
21.0 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 Propene µg/m3 0.242
J0.741 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 Styrene µg/m3 0.124
1090 02/19/2022 11:20TO-15 Tetrachloroethene µg/m3 3.62
4.02 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 Toluene µg/m3 0.0901
J1.32 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 Trichlorofluoromethane µg/m3 0.130
4.42 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.110
J1.32 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.236
12.6 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 o-Xylene µg/m3 0.157
12.7 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 m,p-Xylene µg/m3 0.217
25.3 02/22/2022 21:02TO-15 Xylene (Total)µg/m3 0.157
Page 9 of 52

Client: Hart & Hickman (Charlotte) CASE NARRATIVE
Project: Harrelson Ford Lab Report Number: 22-049-0004
Date: 2/25/2022
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS Method TO-15 Sample 94425 (SSV-5) QC Batch No: V15362/V15360
The sample was diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix. Reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly.

Page 10 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-2
94422 Matrix:
2/16/2022 12:20
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00
38.9 µg/m3 0.202 4.75Acetone 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
0.262 J µg/m3 0.0733 1.60Benzene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.148 µg/m3 0.148 10.4Benzyl Chloride 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.150 µg/m3 0.150 3.35Bromodichloromethane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.153 µg/m3 0.153 5.17Bromoform 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.115 µg/m3 0.115 1.94Bromomethane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.328 µg/m3 0.328 1.111,3-Butadiene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
2.29 J µg/m3 0.0608 6.23Carbon Disulfide 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.155 µg/m3 0.155 3.15
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 2.30Chlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.208 µg/m3 0.208 4.26Chlorodibromomethane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.164 µg/m3 0.164 1.32Chloroethane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.0864 µg/m3 0.0864 2.44Chloroform 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.0673 µg/m3 0.0673 1.03Chloromethane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.161 µg/m3 0.161 3.44Cyclohexane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.151 µg/m3 0.151 3.84
1,2-Dibromoethane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.0963 µg/m3 0.0963 3.011,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.174 µg/m3 0.174 12.01,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.186 µg/m3 0.186 3.011,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
2.79 µg/m3 0.134 2.47Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.101 µg/m3 0.101 2.021,1-Dichloroethane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.129 µg/m3 0.129 2.021,2-Dichloroethane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 11 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-2
94422 Matrix:
2/16/2022 12:20
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 1.981,1-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.0955 µg/m3 0.0955 1.98cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.108 µg/m3 0.108 1.98trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.205 µg/m3 0.205 2.311,2-Dichloropropane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.623 µg/m3 0.623 3.501,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
1.03 J µg/m3 0.435 1.801,4-Dioxane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.136 µg/m3 0.136 1.80
Ethyl Acetate 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
0.395 J µg/m3 0.106 2.17Ethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.128 µg/m3 0.128 2.464-Ethyltoluene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.561 µg/m3 0.561 3.831,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.143 µg/m3 0.143 2.05Heptane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.330 µg/m3 0.330 5.33Hexachlorobutadiene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.0472 µg/m3 0.0472 1.76n-Hexane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
3.23 µg/m3 0.285 2.05
2-Hexanone 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
22.8 µg/m3 0.139 4.92Isopropyl Alchohol 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
4.93 µg/m3 0.224 1.47Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.0336 µg/m3 0.0336 1.80Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
0.508 J µg/m3 0.121 2.054-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
0.750 J µg/m3 0.489 1.74Methylene Chloride 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.183 µg/m3 0.183 2.62Naphthalene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 12 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-2
94422 Matrix:
2/16/2022 12:20
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00
<0.242 µg/m3 0.242 0.861Propene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
0.430 J µg/m3 0.124 2.13Styrene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.104 µg/m3 0.104 3.431,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
6670 µg/m3 9.07 170Tetrachloroethene 50 02/22/22 21:40 V15298ENM
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 1.47Tetrahydrofuran 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
2.03 µg/m3 0.0901 1.88Toluene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.209 µg/m3 0.209 3.711,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
1.86 J µg/m3 0.144 2.731,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.0877 µg/m3 0.0877 2.73
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
1.54 J µg/m3 0.199 2.15Trichloroethene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
1.12 J µg/m3 0.130 2.81Trichlorofluoromethane 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
1.22 J µg/m3 0.110 2.461,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.236 µg/m3 0.236 2.461,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.224 µg/m3 0.224 1.76Vinyl Acetate 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
<0.127 µg/m3 0.127 1.28Vinyl Chloride 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
0.734 J
µg/m3 0.157 2.17
o-Xylene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
1.55 J µg/m3 0.217 5.65m,p-Xylene 1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298ENM
2.28 J µg/m3 0.157 2.17Xylene (Total)1 02/22/22 23:10 V15298
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 95.8 Limits: 70-130%02/22/22 23:101 ENM V15298
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 97.2 Limits: 70-130%02/22/22 21:4050 ENM V15298
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 13 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-DUP
94423 Matrix:
2/16/2022 0:00
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00
42.6 µg/m3 0.202 4.75Acetone 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
0.303 J µg/m3 0.0733 1.60Benzene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.148 µg/m3 0.148 10.4Benzyl Chloride 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.150 µg/m3 0.150 3.35Bromodichloromethane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.153 µg/m3 0.153 5.17Bromoform 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.115 µg/m3 0.115 1.94Bromomethane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.328 µg/m3 0.328 1.111,3-Butadiene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
2.25 J µg/m3 0.0608 6.23Carbon Disulfide 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.155 µg/m3 0.155 3.15
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 2.30Chlorobenzene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.208 µg/m3 0.208 4.26Chlorodibromomethane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.164 µg/m3 0.164 1.32Chloroethane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.0864 µg/m3 0.0864 2.44Chloroform 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.0673 µg/m3 0.0673 1.03Chloromethane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
4.69 µg/m3 0.161 3.44Cyclohexane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.151 µg/m3 0.151 3.84
1,2-Dibromoethane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.0963 µg/m3 0.0963 3.011,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.174 µg/m3 0.174 12.01,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.186 µg/m3 0.186 3.011,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
2.75 µg/m3 0.134 2.47Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.101 µg/m3 0.101 2.021,1-Dichloroethane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.129 µg/m3 0.129 2.021,2-Dichloroethane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 14 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-DUP
94423 Matrix:
2/16/2022 0:00
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 1.981,1-Dichloroethene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.0955 µg/m3 0.0955 1.98cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.108 µg/m3 0.108 1.98trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.205 µg/m3 0.205 2.311,2-Dichloropropane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.623 µg/m3 0.623 3.501,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
0.951 J µg/m3 0.435 1.801,4-Dioxane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.136 µg/m3 0.136 1.80
Ethyl Acetate 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
0.399 J µg/m3 0.106 2.17Ethylbenzene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.128 µg/m3 0.128 2.464-Ethyltoluene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.561 µg/m3 0.561 3.831,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.143 µg/m3 0.143 2.05Heptane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.330 µg/m3 0.330 5.33Hexachlorobutadiene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.0472 µg/m3 0.0472 1.76n-Hexane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
3.22 µg/m3 0.285 2.05
2-Hexanone 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
23.1 µg/m3 0.139 4.92Isopropyl Alchohol 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
5.71 µg/m3 0.224 1.47Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.0336 µg/m3 0.0336 1.80Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.121 µg/m3 0.121 2.054-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
0.750 J µg/m3 0.489 1.74Methylene Chloride 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.183 µg/m3 0.183 2.62Naphthalene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 15 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-DUP
94423 Matrix:
2/16/2022 0:00
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00
<0.242 µg/m3 0.242 0.861Propene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
0.405 J µg/m3 0.124 2.13Styrene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.104 µg/m3 0.104 3.431,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
6440 µg/m3 9.07 170Tetrachloroethene 50 02/22/22 22:18 V15298ENM
0.779 J µg/m3 0.107 1.47Tetrahydrofuran 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
1.82 J µg/m3 0.0901 1.88Toluene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.209 µg/m3 0.209 3.711,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
1.84 J µg/m3 0.144 2.731,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.0877 µg/m3 0.0877 2.73
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
1.50 J µg/m3 0.199 2.15Trichloroethene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
1.11 J µg/m3 0.130 2.81Trichlorofluoromethane 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
1.33 J µg/m3 0.110 2.461,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.236 µg/m3 0.236 2.461,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.224 µg/m3 0.224 1.76Vinyl Acetate 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
<0.127 µg/m3 0.127 1.28Vinyl Chloride 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
0.677 J
µg/m3 0.157 2.17
o-Xylene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
1.48 J µg/m3 0.217 5.65m,p-Xylene 1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298ENM
2.16 J µg/m3 0.157 2.17Xylene (Total)1 02/23/22 00:01 V15298
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 97.8 Limits: 70-130%02/23/22 00:011 ENM V15298
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 97.5 Limits: 70-130%02/22/22 22:1850 ENM V15298
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 16 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-6
94424 Matrix:
2/16/2022 14:55
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00 V15360 02/17/22 09:00
398 µg/m3 4.04 95.0Acetone 20 02/19/22 07:22 V15362ENM
0.393 J µg/m3 0.0733 1.60Benzene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.148 µg/m3 0.148 10.4Benzyl Chloride 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.150 µg/m3 0.150 3.35Bromodichloromethane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.153 µg/m3 0.153 5.17Bromoform 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.115 µg/m3 0.115 1.94Bromomethane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.328 µg/m3 0.328 1.111,3-Butadiene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
3.86 J µg/m3 0.0608 6.23Carbon Disulfide 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.155 µg/m3 0.155 3.15
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 2.30Chlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.208 µg/m3 0.208 4.26Chlorodibromomethane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.164 µg/m3 0.164 1.32Chloroethane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
0.425 J µg/m3 0.0864 2.44Chloroform 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.0673 µg/m3 0.0673 1.03Chloromethane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
8.80 µg/m3 0.161 3.44Cyclohexane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.151 µg/m3 0.151 3.84
1,2-Dibromoethane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.0963 µg/m3 0.0963 3.011,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.174 µg/m3 0.174 12.01,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
1.67 J µg/m3 0.186 3.011,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
2.62 µg/m3 0.134 2.47Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.101 µg/m3 0.101 2.021,1-Dichloroethane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.129 µg/m3 0.129 2.021,2-Dichloroethane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 17 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-6
94424 Matrix:
2/16/2022 14:55
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00 V15360 02/17/22 09:00
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 1.981,1-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
1.13 J µg/m3 0.0955 1.98cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.108 µg/m3 0.108 1.98trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.205 µg/m3 0.205 2.311,2-Dichloropropane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.623 µg/m3 0.623 3.501,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.435 µg/m3 0.435 1.801,4-Dioxane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.136 µg/m3 0.136 1.80
Ethyl Acetate 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
0.903 J µg/m3 0.106 2.17Ethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
0.600 J µg/m3 0.128 2.464-Ethyltoluene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.561 µg/m3 0.561 3.831,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
1.14 J µg/m3 0.143 2.05Heptane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.330 µg/m3 0.330 5.33Hexachlorobutadiene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.0472 µg/m3 0.0472 1.76n-Hexane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
3.93 µg/m3 0.285 2.05
2-Hexanone 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
61.2 µg/m3 0.139 4.92Isopropyl Alchohol 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
15.9 µg/m3 0.224 1.47Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.0336 µg/m3 0.0336 1.80Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
4.48 µg/m3 0.121 2.054-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
0.938 J µg/m3 0.489 1.74Methylene Chloride 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.183 µg/m3 0.183 2.62Naphthalene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 18 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-6
94424 Matrix:
2/16/2022 14:55
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00 V15360 02/17/22 09:00
<0.242 µg/m3 0.242 0.861Propene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
0.835 J µg/m3 0.124 2.13Styrene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.104 µg/m3 0.104 3.431,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
647 µg/m3 3.62 67.8Tetrachloroethene 20 02/19/22 07:22 V15362ENM
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 1.47Tetrahydrofuran 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
7.22 µg/m3 0.0901 1.88Toluene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.209 µg/m3 0.209 3.711,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.144 µg/m3 0.144 2.731,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.0877 µg/m3 0.0877 2.73
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
26.9 µg/m3 0.199 2.15Trichloroethene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
1.33 J µg/m3 0.130 2.81Trichlorofluoromethane 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
2.91 µg/m3 0.110 2.461,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
0.732 J µg/m3 0.236 2.461,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.224 µg/m3 0.224 1.76Vinyl Acetate 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
<0.127 µg/m3 0.127 1.28Vinyl Chloride 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
1.61 J
µg/m3 0.157 2.17
o-Xylene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
3.55 J µg/m3 0.217 5.65m,p-Xylene 1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298ENM
5.16 J µg/m3 0.157 2.17Xylene (Total)1 02/22/22 16:52 V15298
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 89.7 Limits: 70-130%02/22/22 16:521 ENM V15298
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 93.6 Limits: 70-130%02/19/22 07:2220 ENM V15362
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 19 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-5
94425 Matrix:
2/17/2022 14:27
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15360 02/17/22 09:00 V15403 02/22/22 09:00
24.4 J µg/m3 4.04 95.0Acetone 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
35.9 µg/m3 1.46 31.9Benzene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<2.94 µg/m3 2.94 207Benzyl Chloride 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<3.00 µg/m3 3.00 67.0Bromodichloromethane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<3.05 µg/m3 3.05 103Bromoform 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<2.30 µg/m3 2.30 38.8Bromomethane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
22.1 µg/m3 6.53 22.11,3-Butadiene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
25.9 J µg/m3 1.22 125Carbon Disulfide 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<3.10 µg/m3 3.10 62.9
Carbon Tetrachloride 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<2.14 µg/m3 2.14 46.0Chlorobenzene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<4.16 µg/m3 4.16 85.2Chlorodibromomethane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
12.1 J µg/m3 3.28 26.4Chloroethane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<1.73 µg/m3 1.73 48.8Chloroform 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<1.34 µg/m3 1.34 20.6Chloromethane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
72.0 µg/m3 3.22 68.8Cyclohexane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<3.02 µg/m3 3.02 76.8
1,2-Dibromoethane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<1.92 µg/m3 1.92 60.11,2-Dichlorobenzene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<3.48 µg/m3 3.48 2411,3-Dichlorobenzene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<3.72 µg/m3 3.72 60.11,4-Dichlorobenzene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<2.68 µg/m3 2.68 49.4Dichlorodifluoromethane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<2.02 µg/m3 2.02 40.51,1-Dichloroethane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<2.58 µg/m3 2.58 40.51,2-Dichloroethane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 20 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-5
94425 Matrix:
2/17/2022 14:27
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15360 02/17/22 09:00 V15403 02/22/22 09:00
<2.14 µg/m3 2.14 39.61,1-Dichloroethene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
13500 µg/m3 9.54 198cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 100 02/22/22 17:30 V15406ENM
132 µg/m3 2.16 39.6trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<4.10 µg/m3 4.10 46.21,2-Dichloropropane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<12.4 µg/m3 12.4 69.91,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<3.56 µg/m3 3.56 45.4cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<3.56 µg/m3 3.56 45.4trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<8.69 µg/m3 8.69 36.01,4-Dioxane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<2.72 µg/m3 2.72 36.0
Ethyl Acetate 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
61.6 µg/m3 2.12 43.4Ethylbenzene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
11.4 J µg/m3 2.56 49.24-Ethyltoluene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<11.2 µg/m3 11.2 76.61,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
23.8 J µg/m3 2.86 41.0Heptane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<6.62 µg/m3 6.62 107Hexachlorobutadiene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
50.3 µg/m3 0.943 35.2n-Hexane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<5.71 µg/m3 5.71 41.0
2-Hexanone 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
7.67 J µg/m3 2.78 98.3Isopropyl Alchohol 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
9.73 J µg/m3 4.48 29.5Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
252 µg/m3 0.673 36.1Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<2.42 µg/m3 2.42 41.04-Methyl-2-Pentanone 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<9.75 µg/m3 9.75 34.7Methylene Chloride 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<3.66 µg/m3 3.66 52.4Naphthalene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 21 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-5
94425 Matrix:
2/17/2022 14:27
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15360 02/17/22 09:00 V15403 02/22/22 09:00
393 µg/m3 4.84 17.2Propene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<2.48 µg/m3 2.48 42.6Styrene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<2.08 µg/m3 2.08 68.61,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
32.2 J µg/m3 3.62 67.8Tetrachloroethene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<2.14 µg/m3 2.14 29.5Tetrahydrofuran 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
224 µg/m3 1.80 37.7Toluene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<4.18 µg/m3 4.18 74.21,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<2.88 µg/m3 2.88 54.61,1,1-Trichloroethane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<1.75 µg/m3 1.75 54.6
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<3.98 µg/m3 3.98 43.0Trichloroethene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<2.60 µg/m3 2.60 56.2Trichlorofluoromethane 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<2.20 µg/m3 2.20 49.21,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<4.72 µg/m3 4.72 49.21,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
<4.48 µg/m3 4.48 35.2Vinyl Acetate 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
11700 µg/m3 12.7 128Vinyl Chloride 100 02/22/22 17:30 V15406ENM
74.6 µg/m3 3.14 43.4
o-Xylene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
227 µg/m3 4.34 113m,p-Xylene 20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362ENM
302 µg/m3 3.14 43.4Xylene (Total)20 02/19/22 08:01 V15362
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 94.4 Limits: 70-130%02/22/22 17:30100 ENM V15406
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 90.8 Limits: 70-130%02/19/22 08:0120 ENM V15362
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 22 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SG-16
94426 Matrix:
2/17/2022 13:42
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00 V15402 02/25/22 09:00
72.5 µg/m3 0.202 4.75Acetone 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
20.9 µg/m3 0.0733 1.60Benzene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.148 µg/m3 0.148 10.4Benzyl Chloride 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.150 µg/m3 0.150 3.35Bromodichloromethane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.153 µg/m3 0.153 5.17Bromoform 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.115 µg/m3 0.115 1.94Bromomethane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.328 µg/m3 0.328 1.111,3-Butadiene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
12.0 µg/m3 0.0608 6.23Carbon Disulfide 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
1.26 J
µg/m3 0.155 3.15
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 2.30Chlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.208 µg/m3 0.208 4.26Chlorodibromomethane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.164 µg/m3 0.164 1.32Chloroethane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.0864 µg/m3 0.0864 2.44Chloroform 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
0.977 J µg/m3 0.0673 1.03Chloromethane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
21.1 µg/m3 0.161 3.44Cyclohexane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.151 µg/m3 0.151 3.84
1,2-Dibromoethane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.0963 µg/m3 0.0963 3.011,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.174 µg/m3 0.174 12.01,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.186 µg/m3 0.186 3.011,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
3.16 µg/m3 0.134 2.47Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.101 µg/m3 0.101 2.021,1-Dichloroethane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.129 µg/m3 0.129 2.021,2-Dichloroethane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 23 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SG-16
94426 Matrix:
2/17/2022 13:42
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00 V15402 02/25/22 09:00
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 1.981,1-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.0955 µg/m3 0.0955 1.98cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.108 µg/m3 0.108 1.98trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.205 µg/m3 0.205 2.311,2-Dichloropropane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.623 µg/m3 0.623 3.501,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.435 µg/m3 0.435 1.801,4-Dioxane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.136 µg/m3 0.136 1.80
Ethyl Acetate 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
15.8 µg/m3 0.106 2.17Ethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
1.96 J µg/m3 0.128 2.464-Ethyltoluene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
1.12 J µg/m3 0.561 3.831,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
26.1 µg/m3 0.143 2.05Heptane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.330 µg/m3 0.330 5.33Hexachlorobutadiene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
57.0 µg/m3 0.0472 1.76n-Hexane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.285 µg/m3 0.285 2.05
2-Hexanone 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.139 µg/m3 0.139 4.92Isopropyl Alchohol 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
15.6 µg/m3 0.224 1.47Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.0336 µg/m3 0.0336 1.80Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
3.56 µg/m3 0.121 2.054-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
2.17 µg/m3 0.489 1.74Methylene Chloride 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
2.91 µg/m3 0.183 2.62Naphthalene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 24 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SG-16
94426 Matrix:
2/17/2022 13:42
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00 V15402 02/25/22 09:00
152 µg/m3 1.21 4.30Propene 5 02/25/22 11:39 V15405ENM
1.58 J µg/m3 0.124 2.13Styrene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.104 µg/m3 0.104 3.431,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
2.44 J µg/m3 0.181 3.39Tetrachloroethene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
1.57 µg/m3 0.107 1.47Tetrahydrofuran 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
259 µg/m3 0.450 9.42Toluene 5 02/25/22 11:39 V15405ENM
<0.209 µg/m3 0.209 3.711,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.144 µg/m3 0.144 2.731,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.0877 µg/m3 0.0877 2.73
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.199 µg/m3 0.199 2.15Trichloroethene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
2.57 J µg/m3 0.130 2.81Trichlorofluoromethane 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
5.67 µg/m3 0.110 2.461,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
1.97 J µg/m3 0.236 2.461,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.224 µg/m3 0.224 1.76Vinyl Acetate 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
<0.127 µg/m3 0.127 1.28Vinyl Chloride 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
15.2 µg/m3 0.157 2.17
o-Xylene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
55.0 µg/m3 0.217 5.65m,p-Xylene 1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298ENM
70.2 µg/m3 0.157 2.17Xylene (Total)1 02/22/22 18:24 V15298
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 91.1 Limits: 70-130%02/22/22 18:241 ENM V15298
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 92.7 Limits: 70-130%02/25/22 11:395 ENM V15405
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 25 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-4
94427 Matrix:
2/16/2022 14:09
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00
33.1 µg/m3 0.202 4.75Acetone 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
0.326 J µg/m3 0.0733 1.60Benzene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.148 µg/m3 0.148 10.4Benzyl Chloride 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.150 µg/m3 0.150 3.35Bromodichloromethane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.153 µg/m3 0.153 5.17Bromoform 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.115 µg/m3 0.115 1.94Bromomethane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.328 µg/m3 0.328 1.111,3-Butadiene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
1.93 J µg/m3 0.0608 6.23Carbon Disulfide 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.155 µg/m3 0.155 3.15
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 2.30Chlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.208 µg/m3 0.208 4.26Chlorodibromomethane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.164 µg/m3 0.164 1.32Chloroethane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.0864 µg/m3 0.0864 2.44Chloroform 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.0673 µg/m3 0.0673 1.03Chloromethane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
6.81 µg/m3 0.161 3.44Cyclohexane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.151 µg/m3 0.151 3.84
1,2-Dibromoethane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.0963 µg/m3 0.0963 3.011,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.174 µg/m3 0.174 12.01,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.186 µg/m3 0.186 3.011,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
2.76 µg/m3 0.134 2.47Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.101 µg/m3 0.101 2.021,1-Dichloroethane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.129 µg/m3 0.129 2.021,2-Dichloroethane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 26 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-4
94427 Matrix:
2/16/2022 14:09
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 1.981,1-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.0955 µg/m3 0.0955 1.98cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.108 µg/m3 0.108 1.98trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.205 µg/m3 0.205 2.311,2-Dichloropropane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.623 µg/m3 0.623 3.501,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.435 µg/m3 0.435 1.801,4-Dioxane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.136 µg/m3 0.136 1.80
Ethyl Acetate 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
0.577 J µg/m3 0.106 2.17Ethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.128 µg/m3 0.128 2.464-Ethyltoluene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.561 µg/m3 0.561 3.831,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.143 µg/m3 0.143 2.05Heptane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.330 µg/m3 0.330 5.33Hexachlorobutadiene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.0472 µg/m3 0.0472 1.76n-Hexane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
3.50 µg/m3 0.285 2.05
2-Hexanone 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
2.11 JB µg/m3 0.139 4.92Isopropyl Alchohol 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
3.35 µg/m3 0.224 1.47Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.0336 µg/m3 0.0336 1.80Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
1.01 J µg/m3 0.121 2.054-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
0.986 J µg/m3 0.489 1.74Methylene Chloride 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
2.70 µg/m3 0.183 2.62Naphthalene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 27 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-4
94427 Matrix:
2/16/2022 14:09
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00
<0.242 µg/m3 0.242 0.861Propene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
0.575 J µg/m3 0.124 2.13Styrene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.104 µg/m3 0.104 3.431,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
3.37 J µg/m3 0.181 3.39Tetrachloroethene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
0.457 J µg/m3 0.107 1.47Tetrahydrofuran 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
2.72 µg/m3 0.0901 1.88Toluene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.209 µg/m3 0.209 3.711,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.144 µg/m3 0.144 2.731,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.0877 µg/m3 0.0877 2.73
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.199 µg/m3 0.199 2.15Trichloroethene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
1.43 J µg/m3 0.130 2.81Trichlorofluoromethane 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
1.68 J µg/m3 0.110 2.461,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
0.408 J µg/m3 0.236 2.461,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.224 µg/m3 0.224 1.76Vinyl Acetate 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
<0.127 µg/m3 0.127 1.28Vinyl Chloride 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
1.15 J
µg/m3 0.157 2.17
o-Xylene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
2.19 J µg/m3 0.217 5.65m,p-Xylene 1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298ENM
3.34 J µg/m3 0.157 2.17Xylene (Total)1 02/22/22 19:16 V15298
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 95.8 Limits: 70-130%02/22/22 19:161 ENM V15298
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 28 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-1
94428 Matrix:
2/17/2022 13:04
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00 V15360 02/17/22 09:00
30.1 µg/m3 0.202 4.75Acetone 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
0.588 J µg/m3 0.0733 1.60Benzene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.148 µg/m3 0.148 10.4Benzyl Chloride 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.150 µg/m3 0.150 3.35Bromodichloromethane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.153 µg/m3 0.153 5.17Bromoform 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.115 µg/m3 0.115 1.94Bromomethane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.328 µg/m3 0.328 1.111,3-Butadiene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
2.06 J µg/m3 0.0608 6.23Carbon Disulfide 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.155 µg/m3 0.155 3.15
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 2.30Chlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.208 µg/m3 0.208 4.26Chlorodibromomethane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.164 µg/m3 0.164 1.32Chloroethane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
12.1 µg/m3 0.0864 2.44Chloroform 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.0673 µg/m3 0.0673 1.03Chloromethane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
5.42 µg/m3 0.161 3.44Cyclohexane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.151 µg/m3 0.151 3.84
1,2-Dibromoethane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.0963 µg/m3 0.0963 3.011,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.174 µg/m3 0.174 12.01,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.186 µg/m3 0.186 3.011,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
2.77 µg/m3 0.134 2.47Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.101 µg/m3 0.101 2.021,1-Dichloroethane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.129 µg/m3 0.129 2.021,2-Dichloroethane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 29 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-1
94428 Matrix:
2/17/2022 13:04
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00 V15360 02/17/22 09:00
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 1.981,1-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.0955 µg/m3 0.0955 1.98cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.108 µg/m3 0.108 1.98trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.205 µg/m3 0.205 2.311,2-Dichloropropane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.623 µg/m3 0.623 3.501,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
1.86 µg/m3 0.435 1.801,4-Dioxane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.136 µg/m3 0.136 1.80
Ethyl Acetate 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
1.18 J µg/m3 0.106 2.17Ethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
0.555 J µg/m3 0.128 2.464-Ethyltoluene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.561 µg/m3 0.561 3.831,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
0.750 J µg/m3 0.143 2.05Heptane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.330 µg/m3 0.330 5.33Hexachlorobutadiene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
0.779 J µg/m3 0.0472 1.76n-Hexane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.285 µg/m3 0.285 2.05
2-Hexanone 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
4.99 µg/m3 0.139 4.92Isopropyl Alchohol 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
1.70 µg/m3 0.224 1.47Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.0336 µg/m3 0.0336 1.80Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.121 µg/m3 0.121 2.054-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
0.841 J µg/m3 0.489 1.74Methylene Chloride 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
2.81 µg/m3 0.183 2.62Naphthalene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 30 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-1
94428 Matrix:
2/17/2022 13:04
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00 V15360 02/17/22 09:00
<0.242 µg/m3 0.242 0.861Propene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
0.596 J µg/m3 0.124 2.13Styrene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.104 µg/m3 0.104 3.431,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
523 µg/m3 3.62 67.8Tetrachloroethene 20 02/19/22 10:44 V15362ENM
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 1.47Tetrahydrofuran 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
5.18 µg/m3 0.0901 1.88Toluene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.209 µg/m3 0.209 3.711,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.144 µg/m3 0.144 2.731,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.0877 µg/m3 0.0877 2.73
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.199 µg/m3 0.199 2.15Trichloroethene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
1.65 J µg/m3 0.130 2.81Trichlorofluoromethane 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
2.81 µg/m3 0.110 2.461,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
0.703 J µg/m3 0.236 2.461,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.224 µg/m3 0.224 1.76Vinyl Acetate 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
<0.127 µg/m3 0.127 1.28Vinyl Chloride 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
1.97 J
µg/m3 0.157 2.17
o-Xylene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
4.45 J µg/m3 0.217 5.65m,p-Xylene 1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298ENM
6.42 J µg/m3 0.157 2.17Xylene (Total)1 02/22/22 20:10 V15298
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 94.7 Limits: 70-130%02/22/22 20:101 ENM V15298
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 93.9 Limits: 70-130%02/19/22 10:4420 ENM V15362
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 31 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-3
94429 Matrix:
2/16/2022 13:32
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00 V15360 02/17/22 09:00
33.5 µg/m3 0.202 4.75Acetone 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
0.668 J µg/m3 0.0733 1.60Benzene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.148 µg/m3 0.148 10.4Benzyl Chloride 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.150 µg/m3 0.150 3.35Bromodichloromethane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.153 µg/m3 0.153 5.17Bromoform 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.115 µg/m3 0.115 1.94Bromomethane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.328 µg/m3 0.328 1.111,3-Butadiene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
0.532 J µg/m3 0.0608 6.23Carbon Disulfide 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.155 µg/m3 0.155 3.15
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 2.30Chlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.208 µg/m3 0.208 4.26Chlorodibromomethane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.164 µg/m3 0.164 1.32Chloroethane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.0864 µg/m3 0.0864 2.44Chloroform 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.0673 µg/m3 0.0673 1.03Chloromethane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
6.91 µg/m3 0.161 3.44Cyclohexane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.151 µg/m3 0.151 3.84
1,2-Dibromoethane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.0963 µg/m3 0.0963 3.011,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.174 µg/m3 0.174 12.01,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.186 µg/m3 0.186 3.011,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
2.72 µg/m3 0.134 2.47Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.101 µg/m3 0.101 2.021,1-Dichloroethane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.129 µg/m3 0.129 2.021,2-Dichloroethane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 32 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-3
94429 Matrix:
2/16/2022 13:32
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00 V15360 02/17/22 09:00
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 1.981,1-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.0955 µg/m3 0.0955 1.98cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.108 µg/m3 0.108 1.98trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.205 µg/m3 0.205 2.311,2-Dichloropropane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.623 µg/m3 0.623 3.501,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
4.04 µg/m3 0.435 1.801,4-Dioxane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.136 µg/m3 0.136 1.80
Ethyl Acetate 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
2.09 J µg/m3 0.106 2.17Ethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
0.777 J µg/m3 0.128 2.464-Ethyltoluene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.561 µg/m3 0.561 3.831,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
0.533 J µg/m3 0.143 2.05Heptane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.330 µg/m3 0.330 5.33Hexachlorobutadiene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
1.10 J µg/m3 0.0472 1.76n-Hexane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
3.28 µg/m3 0.285 2.05
2-Hexanone 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
21.6 µg/m3 0.139 4.92Isopropyl Alchohol 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
2.94 µg/m3 0.224 1.47Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.0336 µg/m3 0.0336 1.80Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
1.18 J µg/m3 0.121 2.054-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
0.604 J µg/m3 0.489 1.74Methylene Chloride 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
2.75 µg/m3 0.183 2.62Naphthalene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 33 of 52
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
22-049-0004
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Haley Martin
Charlotte
ACO-002 Received : 02/18/2022
Harrelson Ford
Report Date : 02/25/2022
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:SSV-3
94429 Matrix:
2/16/2022 13:32
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V15292 02/22/22 09:00 V15360 02/17/22 09:00
21.0 µg/m3 0.242 0.861Propene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
0.741 J µg/m3 0.124 2.13Styrene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.104 µg/m3 0.104 3.431,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
1090 µg/m3 3.62 67.8Tetrachloroethene 20 02/19/22 11:20 V15362ENM
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 1.47Tetrahydrofuran 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
4.02 µg/m3 0.0901 1.88Toluene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.209 µg/m3 0.209 3.711,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.144 µg/m3 0.144 2.731,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.0877 µg/m3 0.0877 2.73
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.199 µg/m3 0.199 2.15Trichloroethene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
1.32 J µg/m3 0.130 2.81Trichlorofluoromethane 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
4.42 µg/m3 0.110 2.461,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
1.32 J µg/m3 0.236 2.461,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.224 µg/m3 0.224 1.76Vinyl Acetate 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
<0.127 µg/m3 0.127 1.28Vinyl Chloride 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
12.6 µg/m3 0.157 2.17
o-Xylene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
12.7 µg/m3 0.217 5.65m,p-Xylene 1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298ENM
25.3 µg/m3 0.157 2.17Xylene (Total)1 02/22/22 21:02 V15298
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 95.0 Limits: 70-130%02/22/22 21:021 ENM V15298
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 90.5 Limits: 70-130%02/19/22 11:2020 ENM V15362
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 34 of 52
Quality Control Data
22-049-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Harrelson Ford
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V15298QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V15292
Associated Lab Samples: 94422, 94423, 94424, 94426, 94427, 94428, 94429
LRB-V15292 Matrix: AIRLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
02/22/22 12:434.750.2020.321µg/m3Acetone
02/22/22 12:431.600.0733<0.0733µg/m3Benzene
02/22/22 12:4310.40.148<0.148µg/m3Benzyl Chloride
02/22/22 12:433.350.150<0.150µg/m3Bromodichloromethane
02/22/22 12:435.170.153<0.153µg/m3Bromoform
02/22/22 12:431.940.115<0.115µg/m3Bromomethane
02/22/22 12:431.110.328<0.328µg/m31,3-Butadiene
02/22/22 12:436.230.0608<0.0608µg/m3Carbon Disulfide
02/22/22 12:433.150.155<0.155µg/m3Carbon Tetrachloride
02/22/22 12:432.300.107<0.107µg/m3Chlorobenzene
02/22/22 12:434.260.208<0.208µg/m3Chlorodibromomethane
02/22/22 12:431.320.164<0.164µg/m3Chloroethane
02/22/22 12:432.440.0864<0.0864µg/m3Chloroform
02/22/22 12:431.030.0673<0.0673µg/m3Chloromethane
02/22/22 12:433.440.161<0.161µg/m3Cyclohexane
02/22/22 12:433.840.151<0.151µg/m31,2-Dibromoethane
02/22/22 12:433.010.0963<0.0963µg/m31,2-Dichlorobenzene
02/22/22 12:4312.00.174<0.174µg/m31,3-Dichlorobenzene
02/22/22 12:433.010.186<0.186µg/m31,4-Dichlorobenzene
02/22/22 12:432.470.134<0.134µg/m3Dichlorodifluoromethane
02/22/22 12:432.020.101<0.101µg/m31,1-Dichloroethane
02/22/22 12:432.020.129<0.129µg/m31,2-Dichloroethane
02/22/22 12:431.980.107<0.107µg/m31,1-Dichloroethene
02/22/22 12:431.980.0955<0.0955µg/m3cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
02/22/22 12:431.980.108<0.108µg/m3trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
02/22/22 12:432.310.205<0.205µg/m31,2-Dichloropropane
02/22/22 12:433.500.623<0.623µg/m31,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
Page 1 of 12Date:02/25/2022 03:46 PM
Page 35 of 52
Quality Control Data
22-049-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Harrelson Ford
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V15298QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V15292
Associated Lab Samples: 94422, 94423, 94424, 94426, 94427, 94428, 94429
LRB-V15292 Matrix: AIRLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
02/22/22 12:432.270.178<0.178µg/m3cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
02/22/22 12:432.270.178<0.178µg/m3trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
02/22/22 12:431.800.435<0.435µg/m31,4-Dioxane
02/22/22 12:431.800.136<0.136µg/m3Ethyl Acetate
02/22/22 12:432.170.106<0.106µg/m3Ethylbenzene
02/22/22 12:432.460.128<0.128µg/m34-Ethyltoluene
02/22/22 12:433.830.561<0.561µg/m31,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
02/22/22 12:432.050.143<0.143µg/m3Heptane
02/22/22 12:435.330.330<0.330µg/m3Hexachlorobutadiene
02/22/22 12:431.760.0472<0.0472µg/m3n-Hexane
02/22/22 12:432.050.285<0.285µg/m32-Hexanone
02/22/22 12:434.920.1390.339µg/m3Isopropyl Alchohol
02/22/22 12:431.470.224<0.224µg/m3Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)
02/22/22 12:431.800.0336<0.0336µg/m3Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
02/22/22 12:432.050.121<0.121µg/m34-Methyl-2-Pentanone
02/22/22 12:431.740.489<0.489µg/m3Methylene Chloride
02/22/22 12:432.620.183<0.183µg/m3Naphthalene
02/22/22 12:430.8610.242<0.242µg/m3Propene
02/22/22 12:432.130.124<0.124µg/m3Styrene
02/22/22 12:433.430.104<0.104µg/m31,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
02/22/22 12:433.390.181<0.181µg/m3Tetrachloroethene
02/22/22 12:431.470.107<0.107µg/m3Tetrahydrofuran
02/22/22 12:431.880.0901<0.0901µg/m3Toluene
02/22/22 12:433.710.209<0.209µg/m31,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
02/22/22 12:432.730.144<0.144µg/m31,1,1-Trichloroethane
02/22/22 12:432.730.0877<0.0877µg/m31,1,2-Trichloroethane
02/22/22 12:432.150.199<0.199µg/m3Trichloroethene
Page 2 of 12Date:02/25/2022 03:46 PM
Page 36 of 52
Quality Control Data
22-049-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Harrelson Ford
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V15298QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V15292
Associated Lab Samples: 94422, 94423, 94424, 94426, 94427, 94428, 94429
LRB-V15292 Matrix: AIRLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
02/22/22 12:432.810.130<0.130µg/m3Trichlorofluoromethane
02/22/22 12:432.460.110<0.110µg/m31,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
02/22/22 12:432.460.236<0.236µg/m31,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
02/22/22 12:431.760.224<0.224µg/m3Vinyl Acetate
02/22/22 12:431.280.127<0.127µg/m3Vinyl Chloride
02/22/22 12:432.170.157<0.157µg/m3o-Xylene
02/22/22 12:435.650.217<0.217µg/m3m,p-Xylene
02/22/22 12:434-Bromofluorobenzene (S)97.7 70-130
LCS-V15292Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
10112.011.9µg/m3Acetone 70-130
10416.616.0µg/m3Benzene 70-130
11229.025.9µg/m3Benzyl Chloride 70-130
10735.933.5µg/m3Bromodichloromethane 70-130
11157.251.7µg/m3Bromoform 70-130
10620.619.4µg/m3Bromomethane 70-130
10211.311.1µg/m31,3-Butadiene 70-130
11317.615.6µg/m3Carbon Disulfide 70-130
10432.831.5µg/m3Carbon Tetrachloride 70-130
11025.323.0µg/m3Chlorobenzene 70-130
11348.342.6µg/m3Chlorodibromomethane 70-130
10313.613.2µg/m3Chloroethane 70-130
10325.224.4µg/m3Chloroform 70-130
10711.010.3µg/m3Chloromethane 70-130
10017.217.2µg/m3Cyclohexane 70-130
Page 3 of 12Date:02/25/2022 03:46 PM
Page 37 of 52
Quality Control Data
22-049-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Harrelson Ford
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V15298QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V15292
LCS-V15292Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
11343.238.4µg/m31,2-Dibromoethane 70-130
11233.730.1µg/m31,2-Dichlorobenzene 70-130
10932.730.1µg/m31,3-Dichlorobenzene 70-130
10732.130.1µg/m31,4-Dichlorobenzene 70-130
10325.524.7µg/m3Dichlorodifluoromethane 70-130
10922.020.2µg/m31,1-Dichloroethane 70-130
10220.720.2µg/m31,2-Dichloroethane 70-130
11122.019.8µg/m31,1-Dichloroethene 70-130
10921.619.8µg/m3cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 70-130
11121.919.8µg/m3trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 70-130
10524.223.1µg/m31,2-Dichloropropane 70-130
10335.935.0µg/m31,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 70-130
11125.222.7µg/m3cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 70-130
11125.222.7µg/m3trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 70-130
11921.418.0µg/m31,4-Dioxane 70-130
11320.418.0µg/m3Ethyl Acetate 70-130
10823.521.7µg/m3Ethylbenzene 70-130
11428.024.6µg/m34-Ethyltoluene 70-130
10138.638.3µg/m31,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 70-130
10521.620.5µg/m3Heptane 70-130
11360.053.3µg/m3Hexachlorobutadiene 70-130
10518.417.6µg/m3n-Hexane 70-130
10722.020.5µg/m32-Hexanone 70-130
97.512.012.3µg/m3Isopropyl Alchohol 70-130
10615.714.8µg/m3Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)70-130
99.417.918.0µg/m3Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)70-130
11223.020.5µg/m34-Methyl-2-Pentanone 70-130
Page 4 of 12Date:02/25/2022 03:46 PM
Page 38 of 52
Quality Control Data
22-049-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Harrelson Ford
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V15298QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V15292
LCS-V15292Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
10017.417.4µg/m3Methylene Chloride 70-130
11129.226.2µg/m3Naphthalene 70-130
1008.648.61µg/m3Propene 70-130
11223.921.3µg/m3Styrene 70-130
11338.834.3µg/m31,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 70-130
10736.233.9µg/m3Tetrachloroethene 70-130
10515.414.7µg/m3Tetrahydrofuran 70-130
10620.018.8µg/m3Toluene 70-130
11341.937.1µg/m31,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70-130
98.526.927.3µg/m31,1,1-Trichloroethane 70-130
11029.927.3µg/m31,1,2-Trichloroethane 70-130
95.125.626.9µg/m3Trichloroethene 70-130
10629.928.1µg/m3Trichlorofluoromethane 70-130
11728.824.6µg/m31,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 70-130
11628.624.6µg/m31,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 70-130
11019.317.6µg/m3Vinyl Acetate 70-130
10313.212.8µg/m3Vinyl Chloride 70-130
11023.821.7µg/m3o-Xylene 70-130
10947.443.4µg/m3m,p-Xylene 70-130
1014-Bromofluorobenzene (S)70-130
Page 5 of 12Date:02/25/2022 03:46 PM
Page 39 of 52
Quality Control Data
22-049-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Harrelson Ford
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V15362QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V15360
Associated Lab Samples: 94424, 94425, 94428, 94429
LRB-V15360 Matrix: AIRLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
02/18/22 23:414.750.2020.230µg/m3Acetone
02/18/22 23:411.600.0733<0.0733µg/m3Benzene
02/18/22 23:4110.40.148<0.148µg/m3Benzyl Chloride
02/18/22 23:413.350.150<0.150µg/m3Bromodichloromethane
02/18/22 23:415.170.153<0.153µg/m3Bromoform
02/18/22 23:411.940.115<0.115µg/m3Bromomethane
02/18/22 23:411.110.328<0.328µg/m31,3-Butadiene
02/18/22 23:416.230.06081.92µg/m3Carbon Disulfide
02/18/22 23:413.150.155<0.155µg/m3Carbon Tetrachloride
02/18/22 23:412.300.107<0.107µg/m3Chlorobenzene
02/18/22 23:414.260.208<0.208µg/m3Chlorodibromomethane
02/18/22 23:411.320.164<0.164µg/m3Chloroethane
02/18/22 23:412.440.0864<0.0864µg/m3Chloroform
02/18/22 23:411.030.0673<0.0673µg/m3Chloromethane
02/18/22 23:413.440.161<0.161µg/m3Cyclohexane
02/18/22 23:413.840.151<0.151µg/m31,2-Dibromoethane
02/18/22 23:413.010.0963<0.0963µg/m31,2-Dichlorobenzene
02/18/22 23:4112.00.174<0.174µg/m31,3-Dichlorobenzene
02/18/22 23:413.010.186<0.186µg/m31,4-Dichlorobenzene
02/18/22 23:412.470.134<0.134µg/m3Dichlorodifluoromethane
02/18/22 23:412.020.101<0.101µg/m31,1-Dichloroethane
02/18/22 23:412.020.129<0.129µg/m31,2-Dichloroethane
02/18/22 23:411.980.107<0.107µg/m31,1-Dichloroethene
02/18/22 23:411.980.108<0.108µg/m3trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
02/18/22 23:412.310.205<0.205µg/m31,2-Dichloropropane
02/18/22 23:413.500.623<0.623µg/m31,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
02/18/22 23:412.270.178<0.178µg/m3cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Page 6 of 12Date:02/25/2022 03:46 PM
Page 40 of 52
Quality Control Data
22-049-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Harrelson Ford
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V15362QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V15360
Associated Lab Samples: 94424, 94425, 94428, 94429
LRB-V15360 Matrix: AIRLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
02/18/22 23:412.270.178<0.178µg/m3trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
02/18/22 23:411.800.435<0.435µg/m31,4-Dioxane
02/18/22 23:411.800.136<0.136µg/m3Ethyl Acetate
02/18/22 23:412.170.106<0.106µg/m3Ethylbenzene
02/18/22 23:412.460.128<0.128µg/m34-Ethyltoluene
02/18/22 23:413.830.561<0.561µg/m31,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
02/18/22 23:412.050.143<0.143µg/m3Heptane
02/18/22 23:415.330.330<0.330µg/m3Hexachlorobutadiene
02/18/22 23:411.760.0472<0.0472µg/m3n-Hexane
02/18/22 23:412.050.285<0.285µg/m32-Hexanone
02/18/22 23:414.920.1390.300µg/m3Isopropyl Alchohol
02/18/22 23:411.470.224<0.224µg/m3Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)
02/18/22 23:411.800.0336<0.0336µg/m3Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
02/18/22 23:412.050.121<0.121µg/m34-Methyl-2-Pentanone
02/18/22 23:411.740.489<0.489µg/m3Methylene Chloride
02/18/22 23:412.620.183<0.183µg/m3Naphthalene
02/18/22 23:410.8610.242<0.242µg/m3Propene
02/18/22 23:412.130.124<0.124µg/m3Styrene
02/18/22 23:413.430.104<0.104µg/m31,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
02/18/22 23:413.390.181<0.181µg/m3Tetrachloroethene
02/18/22 23:411.470.107<0.107µg/m3Tetrahydrofuran
02/18/22 23:411.880.0901<0.0901µg/m3Toluene
02/18/22 23:413.710.209<0.209µg/m31,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
02/18/22 23:412.730.144<0.144µg/m31,1,1-Trichloroethane
02/18/22 23:412.730.0877<0.0877µg/m31,1,2-Trichloroethane
02/18/22 23:412.150.199<0.199µg/m3Trichloroethene
02/18/22 23:412.810.130<0.130µg/m3Trichlorofluoromethane
Page 7 of 12Date:02/25/2022 03:46 PM
Page 41 of 52
Quality Control Data
22-049-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Harrelson Ford
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V15362QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V15360
Associated Lab Samples: 94424, 94425, 94428, 94429
LRB-V15360 Matrix: AIRLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
02/18/22 23:412.460.110<0.110µg/m31,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
02/18/22 23:412.460.236<0.236µg/m31,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
02/18/22 23:411.760.224<0.224µg/m3Vinyl Acetate
02/18/22 23:412.170.157<0.157µg/m3o-Xylene
02/18/22 23:415.650.217<0.217µg/m3m,p-Xylene
02/18/22 23:414-Bromofluorobenzene (S)96.6 70-130
LCS-V15360Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
94.111.211.9µg/m3Acetone 70-130
98.715.816.0µg/m3Benzene 70-130
10326.825.9µg/m3Benzyl Chloride 70-130
10033.633.5µg/m3Bromodichloromethane 70-130
10152.451.7µg/m3Bromoform 70-130
10119.619.4µg/m3Bromomethane 70-130
92.710.311.1µg/m31,3-Butadiene 70-130
10616.515.6µg/m3Carbon Disulfide 70-130
98.030.931.5µg/m3Carbon Tetrachloride 70-130
10223.523.0µg/m3Chlorobenzene 70-130
10444.242.6µg/m3Chlorodibromomethane 70-130
94.612.513.2µg/m3Chloroethane 70-130
98.724.124.4µg/m3Chloroform 70-130
10410.710.3µg/m3Chloromethane 70-130
94.716.317.2µg/m3Cyclohexane 70-130
10439.938.4µg/m31,2-Dibromoethane 70-130
10331.130.1µg/m31,2-Dichlorobenzene 70-130
Page 8 of 12Date:02/25/2022 03:46 PM
Page 42 of 52
Quality Control Data
22-049-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Harrelson Ford
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V15362QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V15360
LCS-V15360Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
10030.230.1µg/m31,3-Dichlorobenzene 70-130
97.329.330.1µg/m31,4-Dichlorobenzene 70-130
95.923.724.7µg/m3Dichlorodifluoromethane 70-130
10320.920.2µg/m31,1-Dichloroethane 70-130
95.519.320.2µg/m31,2-Dichloroethane 70-130
10520.719.8µg/m31,1-Dichloroethene 70-130
10520.819.8µg/m3trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 70-130
93.921.723.1µg/m31,2-Dichloropropane 70-130
98.234.435.0µg/m31,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 70-130
10323.322.7µg/m3cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 70-130
10323.322.7µg/m3trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 70-130
10919.618.0µg/m31,4-Dioxane 70-130
10619.018.0µg/m3Ethyl Acetate 70-130
10021.721.7µg/m3Ethylbenzene 70-130
10525.824.6µg/m34-Ethyltoluene 70-130
96.336.938.3µg/m31,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 70-130
98.520.220.5µg/m3Heptane 70-130
10455.253.3µg/m3Hexachlorobutadiene 70-130
10117.817.6µg/m3n-Hexane 70-130
10120.720.5µg/m32-Hexanone 70-130
91.011.212.3µg/m3Isopropyl Alchohol 70-130
10315.314.8µg/m3Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)70-130
97.217.518.0µg/m3Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)70-130
10621.720.5µg/m34-Methyl-2-Pentanone 70-130
97.116.917.4µg/m3Methylene Chloride 70-130
10226.826.2µg/m3Naphthalene 70-130
92.37.958.61µg/m3Propene 70-130
Page 9 of 12Date:02/25/2022 03:46 PM
Page 43 of 52
Quality Control Data
22-049-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Harrelson Ford
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V15362QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V15360
LCS-V15360Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
10422.221.3µg/m3Styrene 70-130
10134.634.3µg/m31,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 70-130
10234.733.9µg/m3Tetrachloroethene 70-130
97.914.414.7µg/m3Tetrahydrofuran 70-130
10018.818.8µg/m3Toluene 70-130
11843.637.1µg/m31,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70-130
94.525.827.3µg/m31,1,1-Trichloroethane 70-130
10027.427.3µg/m31,1,2-Trichloroethane 70-130
94.025.326.9µg/m3Trichloroethene 70-130
10128.328.1µg/m3Trichlorofluoromethane 70-130
10626.124.6µg/m31,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 70-130
10726.224.6µg/m31,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 70-130
11119.617.6µg/m3Vinyl Acetate 70-130
10222.221.7µg/m3o-Xylene 70-130
10043.543.4µg/m3m,p-Xylene 70-130
1014-Bromofluorobenzene (S)70-130
Page 10 of 12Date:02/25/2022 03:46 PM
Page 44 of 52
Quality Control Data
22-049-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Harrelson Ford
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V15405QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V15402
Associated Lab Samples: 94426
LRB-V15402 Matrix: AIRLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
02/25/22 10:400.8610.242<0.242µg/m3Propene
02/25/22 10:401.880.0901<0.0901µg/m3Toluene
02/25/22 10:404-Bromofluorobenzene (S)96.0 70-130
LCS-V15402Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
1159.948.61µg/m3Propene 70-130
11321.218.8µg/m3Toluene 70-130
99.74-Bromofluorobenzene (S)70-130
Page 11 of 12Date:02/25/2022 03:46 PM
Page 45 of 52
Quality Control Data
22-049-0004Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Harrelson Ford
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V15406QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V15403
Associated Lab Samples: 94425
LRB-V15403 Matrix: AIRLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
02/22/22 12:431.980.0955<0.0955µg/m3cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
02/22/22 12:431.280.127<0.127µg/m3Vinyl Chloride
02/22/22 12:434-Bromofluorobenzene (S)97.7 70-130
LCS-V15403Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
10921.619.8µg/m3cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 70-130
10313.212.8µg/m3Vinyl Chloride 70-130
1014-Bromofluorobenzene (S)70-130
Page 12 of 12Date:02/25/2022 03:46 PM
Page 46 of 52
Fed Ex
UPS
US Postal
Client
Lab
Courier
Other :
Shipment Receipt Form
Customer Number:
Customer Name:
Report Number:22-049-0004
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
01102
Shipping Method
Shipping container/cooler uncompromised?
Thermometer ID:N/A
Chain of Custody (COC) present?Yes No
Yes No Not Present
Yes No Not Present
Yes No
COC agrees with sample label(s)? Yes No
COC properly completed
Samples in proper containers?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)?
All samples received within holding time?
Cooler temperature in compliance?
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes NoCooler/Samples arrived at the laboratory on ice.
Samples were considered acceptable as cooling
process had begun.
Yes No
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/ASoil VOA method 5035 – compliance criteria met
Water - Sample containers properly preserved
Water - VOA vials free of headspace Yes No N/A
Trip Blanks received with VOAs
Low concentration EnCore samplers (48 hr)
High concentration pre-weighed (methanol -14 d) Low conc pre-weighed vials (Sod Bis -14 d)
High concentration container (48 hr)
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Number of coolers/boxes received
Yes No
1
Signature:Sarah J. Locklear Date & Time:02/18/2022 11:12:42
Special precautions or instructions included?
Comments:
Page 47 of 52
Page 48 of 52
Page 49 of 52
Page 50 of 52
Page 51 of 52
Page 52 of 52

Appendix C

DEQ Risk Calculator

Version Date:
Basis:
Site Name:
Site Address:
DEQ Section:
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID:
Submittal Date:
Reviewed By:
Prepared By:LES
HHM
Building 2 Soil Gas (SSV-1)
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Risk Calculator
Harrelson Ford
6500 South Boulevard, Charlotte, NC
January 2022
November 2021 EPA RSL Table
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Complete Exposure Pathways
Version Date: January 2022
Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Building 2 Soil Gas (SSV-1)
Note: Risk output will only be calculated for complete exposure pathways.
Receptor Pathway
Check box if
pathway
complete
Soil
Groundwater Use
Soil
Groundwater Use
Construction Worker Soil
Soil
Surface Water
Groundwater to Indoor Air
Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Indoor Air
Groundwater to Indoor Air
Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Indoor Air
Source Soil
Source Groundwater
Source Soil
Source Groundwater
Input Form 1A
VAPOR INTRUSION PATHWAYS
DIRECT CONTACT SOIL AND WATER PATHWAYS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
Recreator/Trespasser
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
CONTAMINANT MIGRATION PATHWAYS
Groundwater
Surface Water
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Exposure Point ConcentrationsVersion Date: January 2022Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL TableSite ID: Exposure Unit ID: Building 2 Soil Gas (SSV-1)Description of Exposure Point Concentration Selection:Exposure Point Concentration (ug/m3)Notes: CAS Number ChemicalMinimum Concentration (Qualifier)Maximum Concentration (Qualifier)UnitsLocation of Maximum ConcentrationDetection FrequencyRange of Detection LimitsConcentration Used for ScreeningBackground ValueScreening Toxicity Value (Screening Level) (n/c)Potential ARAR/TBC ValuePotential ARAR/TBC SourceCOPC Flag (Y/N)Rationale for Selection or Deletion30.1 67-64-1 Acetoneug/m30.58871-43-2Benzeneug/m32.0675-15-0Carbon Disulfideug/m312.167-66-3Chloroformug/m35.42110-82-7Cyclohexaneug/m32.7775-71-8Dichlorodifluoromethaneug/m31.86123-91-1Dioxane, 1,4-ug/m31.18100-41-4Ethylbenzeneug/m30.75142-82-5Heptane, N-ug/m30.779110-54-3Hexane, N-ug/m34.9967-63-0Isopropanolug/m31.778-93-3Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)ug/m30.84175-09-2Methylene Chlorideug/m32.8191-20-3~Naphthaleneug/m30.596100-42-5Styreneug/m3523127-18-4Tetrachloroethyleneug/m35.18108-88-3Tolueneug/m31.6575-69-4Trichlorofluoromethaneug/m32.8195-63-6Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-ug/m30.703108-67-8Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-ug/m36.421330-20-7Xylenesug/m3Input Form 2DSoil Gas Exposure Point Concentration TableNote: Chemicals highlighted in orange are non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion risk, no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.If the chemical list is changed from a prior calculator run, remember to select "See All Chemicals" on the data output sheet or newly added chemicals will not be included in risk calculationsNorth Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Risk for Individual Pathways Output Form 1A
Version Date: January 2022
Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Building 2 Soil Gas (SSV-1)
Receptor Pathway Carcinogenic
Risk Hazard Index Risk exceeded?
Soil NC NC NC
Groundwater Use*NC NC NC
Soil NC NC NC
Groundwater Use*NC NC NC
Construction Worker Soil NC NC NC
Soil NC NC NC
Surface Water*NC NC NC
Receptor Pathway Carcinogenic
Risk Hazard Index Risk exceeded?
Groundwater to Indoor Air NC NC NC
Soil Gas to Indoor Air 5.6E-06 4.1E-01 NO
Indoor Air NC NC NC
Groundwater to Indoor Air NC NC NC
Soil Gas to Indoor Air 4.3E-07 3.3E-02 NO
Indoor Air NC NC NC
Pathway Source
Source Soil NC
Source Groundwater NC
Source Soil NC
Source Groundwater NC
3. NM = Not Modeled
4. NC = Pathway not calculated
DIRECT CONTACT SOIL AND WATER CALCULATORS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
Recreator/Trespasser
2. * = If concentrations in groundwater exceed the NC 2L Standards or IMAC, or concentrations in surface water exceed the
NC 2B Standards, appropriate remediation and/or institutional control measures will be necessary to be eligible for a risk-based
closure.
Surface Water Exceedence of 2B at Receptor?
Exceedence of 2B at Receptor?
VAPOR INTRUSION CALCULATORS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
CONTAMINANT MIGRATION CALCULATORS
Target Receptor Concentrations Exceeded?
Groundwater Exceedence of 2L at Receptor?
Exceedence of 2L at Receptor?
1. If lead concentrations were entered in the exposure point concentration tables, see the individual calculator sheets for lead
concentrations in comparison to screening levels. Note that lead is not included in cumulative risk calculations.
Notes:
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
DEQ Risk Calculator - Vapor Intrusion - Resident Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Version Date: January 2022
Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Building 2 Soil Gas (SSV-1)
CAS #Chemical Name:
Soil Gas
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Calculated
Indoor Air
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Target Indoor
Air Conc. for
Carcinogens @
TCR = 1E-06
Target Indoor Air
Conc. for Non-
Carcinogens @
THQ = 0.2
Calculated
Carcinogenic
Risk
Calculated
Non-
Carcinogenic
Hazard
Quotient
67-64-1 Acetone 30.1 0.903 - -
71-43-2 Benzene 0.588 0.01764 3.6E-01 6.3E+00 4.9E-08 5.6E-04
75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide 2.06 0.0618 - 1.5E+02 8.5E-05
67-66-3 Chloroform 12.1 0.363 1.2E-01 2.0E+01 3.0E-06 3.6E-03
110-82-7 Cyclohexane 5.42 0.1626 - 1.3E+03 2.6E-05
75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.77 0.0831 - 2.1E+01 8.0E-04
123-91-1 Dioxane, 1,4- 1.86 0.0558 5.6E-01 6.3E+00 9.9E-08 1.8E-03
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 1.18 0.0354 1.1E+00 2.1E+02 3.2E-08 3.4E-05
142-82-5 Heptane, N- 0.75 0.0225 - 8.3E+01 5.4E-05
110-54-3 Hexane, N- 0.779 0.02337 - 1.5E+02 3.2E-05
67-63-0 Isopropanol 4.99 0.1497 - 4.2E+01 7.2E-04
78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 1.7 0.051 - 1.0E+03 9.8E-06
75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.841 0.02523 1.0E+02 1.3E+02 2.5E-10 4.0E-05
91-20-3 ~Naphthalene 2.81 0.0843 8.3E-02 6.3E-01 1.0E-06 2.7E-02
100-42-5 Styrene 0.596 0.01788 - 2.1E+02 1.7E-05
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 523 15.69 1.1E+01 8.3E+00 1.5E-06 3.8E-01
108-88-3 Toluene 5.18 0.1554 - 1.0E+03 3.0E-05
75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 1.65 0.0495 - -
95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4- 2.81 0.0843 - 1.3E+01 1.3E-03
108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5- 0.703 0.02109 - 1.3E+01 3.4E-04
1330-20-7 Xylenes 6.42 0.1926 - 2.1E+01 1.8E-03
Cumulative: 5.6E-06 4.1E-01
All concentrations are in ug/m3
Output Form 3B
Carcinogenic risk and hazard quotient cells highlighted in orange are associated with non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion
risk, no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
DEQ Risk Calculator - Vapor Intrusion - Non-Residential Worker Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Version Date: January 2022
Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Building 2 Soil Gas (SSV-1)
CAS # Chemical Name:
Soil Gas
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Calculated
Indoor Air
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Target Indoor
Air Conc. for
Carcinogens @
TCR = 1E-06
Target Indoor Air
Conc. for Non-
Carcinogens @
THQ = 0.2
Calculated
Carcinogenic
Risk
Calculated
Non-
Carcinogenic
Hazard
Quotient
67-64-1 Acetone 30.1 0.301 - -
71-43-2 Benzene 0.588 0.00588 1.6E+00 2.6E+01 3.7E-09 4.5E-05
75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide 2.06 0.0206 - 6.1E+02 6.7E-06
67-66-3 Chloroform 12.1 0.121 5.3E-01 8.6E+01 2.3E-07 2.8E-04
110-82-7 Cyclohexane 5.42 0.0542 - 5.3E+03 2.1E-06
75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.77 0.0277 - 8.8E+01 6.3E-05
123-91-1 Dioxane, 1,4- 1.86 0.0186 2.5E+00 2.6E+01 7.6E-09 1.4E-04
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 1.18 0.0118 4.9E+00 8.8E+02 2.4E-09 2.7E-06
142-82-5 Heptane, N- 0.75 0.0075 - 3.5E+02 4.3E-06
110-54-3 Hexane, N- 0.779 0.00779 - 6.1E+02 2.5E-06
67-63-0 Isopropanol 4.99 0.0499 - 1.8E+02 5.7E-05
78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 1.7 0.017 - 4.4E+03 7.8E-07
75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.841 0.00841 1.2E+03 5.3E+02 6.9E-12 3.2E-06
91-20-3 ~Naphthalene 2.81 0.0281 3.6E-01 2.6E+00 7.8E-08 2.1E-03
100-42-5 Styrene 0.596 0.00596 - 8.8E+02 1.4E-06
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 523 5.23 4.7E+01 3.5E+01 1.1E-07 3.0E-02
108-88-3 Toluene 5.18 0.0518 - 4.4E+03 2.4E-06
75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 1.65 0.0165 - -
95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4- 2.81 0.0281 - 5.3E+01 1.1E-04
108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5- 0.703 0.00703 - 5.3E+01 2.7E-05
1330-20-7 Xylenes 6.42 0.0642 - 8.8E+01 1.5E-04
Cumulative: 4.3E-07 3.3E-02
All concentrations are in ug/m3
Output Form
Carcinogenic risk and hazard quotient cells highlighted in orange are associated with non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion risk,
no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Version Date:
Basis:
Site Name:
Site Address:
DEQ Section:
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID:
Submittal Date:
Reviewed By:
Prepared By:LES
HHM
Building 3 Soil Gas (SSV-2/SSV-DUP, SSV-3, and SSV-4)
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Risk Calculator
Harrelson Ford
6500 South Boulevard, Charlotte, NC
January 2022
November 2021 EPA RSL Table
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Complete Exposure Pathways
Version Date: January 2022
Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Building 3 Soil Gas (SSV-2/SSV-DUP, SSV-3, and SSV-4)
Note: Risk output will only be calculated for complete exposure pathways.
Receptor Pathway
Check box if
pathway
complete
Soil
Groundwater Use
Soil
Groundwater Use
Construction Worker Soil
Soil
Surface Water
Groundwater to Indoor Air
Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Indoor Air
Groundwater to Indoor Air
Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Indoor Air
Source Soil
Source Groundwater
Source Soil
Source Groundwater
Input Form 1A
VAPOR INTRUSION PATHWAYS
DIRECT CONTACT SOIL AND WATER PATHWAYS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
Recreator/Trespasser
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
CONTAMINANT MIGRATION PATHWAYS
Groundwater
Surface Water
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Exposure Point ConcentrationsVersion Date: January 2022Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL TableSite ID: Exposure Unit ID: Building 3 Soil Gas (SSV-2/SSV-DUP, SSV-3, and SSV-4)Description of Exposure Point Concentration Selection:Exposure Point Concentration (ug/m3)Notes: CAS Number ChemicalMinimum Concentration (Qualifier)Maximum Concentration (Qualifier)UnitsLocation of Maximum ConcentrationDetection FrequencyRange of Detection LimitsConcentration Used for ScreeningBackground ValueScreening Toxicity Value (Screening Level) (n/c)Potential ARAR/TBC ValuePotential ARAR/TBC SourceCOPC Flag (Y/N)Rationale for Selection or Deletion42.6 67-64-1 Acetoneug/m30.66871-43-2Benzeneug/m32.2975-15-0Carbon Disulfideug/m36.91110-82-7Cyclohexaneug/m32.7975-71-8Dichlorodifluoromethaneug/m34.04123-91-1Dioxane, 1,4-ug/m32.09100-41-4Ethylbenzeneug/m30.779109-99-9~Tetrahydrofuranug/m30.533142-82-5Heptane, N-ug/m31.1110-54-3Hexane, N-ug/m33.5591-78-6Hexanone, 2-ug/m323.167-63-0Isopropanolug/m35.7178-93-3Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)ug/m31.18108-10-1Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone)ug/m30.98675-09-2Methylene Chlorideug/m32.7591-20-3~Naphthaleneug/m321115-07-1Propyleneug/m30.741100-42-5Styreneug/m36670127-18-4Tetrachloroethyleneug/m34.02108-88-3Tolueneug/m31.8671-55-6Trichloroethane, 1,1,1-ug/m31.5479-01-6Trichloroethyleneug/m31.4375-69-4Trichlorofluoromethaneug/m34.4295-63-6Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-ug/m31.32108-67-8Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-ug/m325.31330-20-7Xylenesug/m3Input Form 2DSoil Gas Exposure Point Concentration TableNote: Chemicals highlighted in orange are non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion risk, no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.If the chemical list is changed from a prior calculator run, remember to select "See All Chemicals" on the data output sheet or newly added chemicals will not be included in risk calculationsNorth Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Risk for Individual Pathways Output Form 1A
Version Date: January 2022
Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Building 3 Soil Gas (SSV-2/SSV-DUP, SSV-3, and SSV-4)
Receptor Pathway Carcinogenic
Risk Hazard Index Risk exceeded?
Soil NC NC NC
Groundwater Use*NC NC NC
Soil NC NC NC
Groundwater Use*NC NC NC
Construction Worker Soil NC NC NC
Soil NC NC NC
Surface Water*NC NC NC
Receptor Pathway Carcinogenic
Risk Hazard Index Risk exceeded?
Groundwater to Indoor Air NC NC NC
Soil Gas to Indoor Air 2.0E-05 4.9E+00 YES
Indoor Air NC NC NC
Groundwater to Indoor Air NC NC NC
Soil Gas to Indoor Air 1.5E-06 3.9E-01 NO
Indoor Air NC NC NC
Pathway Source
Source Soil NC
Source Groundwater NC
Source Soil NC
Source Groundwater NC
3. NM = Not Modeled
4. NC = Pathway not calculated
DIRECT CONTACT SOIL AND WATER CALCULATORS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
Recreator/Trespasser
2. * = If concentrations in groundwater exceed the NC 2L Standards or IMAC, or concentrations in surface water exceed the
NC 2B Standards, appropriate remediation and/or institutional control measures will be necessary to be eligible for a risk-based
closure.
Surface Water Exceedence of 2B at Receptor?
Exceedence of 2B at Receptor?
VAPOR INTRUSION CALCULATORS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
CONTAMINANT MIGRATION CALCULATORS
Target Receptor Concentrations Exceeded?
Groundwater Exceedence of 2L at Receptor?
Exceedence of 2L at Receptor?
1. If lead concentrations were entered in the exposure point concentration tables, see the individual calculator sheets for lead
concentrations in comparison to screening levels. Note that lead is not included in cumulative risk calculations.
Notes:
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
DEQ Risk Calculator - Vapor Intrusion - Resident Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Version Date: January 2022
Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Building 3 Soil Gas (SSV-2/SSV-DUP, SSV-3, and SSV-4)
CAS #Chemical Name:
Soil Gas
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Calculated
Indoor Air
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Target Indoor
Air Conc. for
Carcinogens @
TCR = 1E-06
Target Indoor Air
Conc. for Non-
Carcinogens @
THQ = 0.2
Calculated
Carcinogenic
Risk
Calculated
Non-
Carcinogenic
Hazard
Quotient
67-64-1 Acetone 42.6 1.278 - -
71-43-2 Benzene 0.668 0.02004 3.6E-01 6.3E+00 5.6E-08 6.4E-04
75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide 2.29 0.0687 - 1.5E+02 9.4E-05
110-82-7 Cyclohexane 6.91 0.2073 - 1.3E+03 3.3E-05
75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.79 0.0837 - 2.1E+01 8.0E-04
123-91-1 Dioxane, 1,4- 4.04 0.1212 5.6E-01 6.3E+00 2.2E-07 3.9E-03
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 2.09 0.0627 1.1E+00 2.1E+02 5.6E-08 6.0E-05
109-99-9 ~Tetrahydrofuran 0.779 0.02337 - 4.2E+02 1.1E-05
142-82-5 Heptane, N- 0.533 0.01599 - 8.3E+01 3.8E-05
110-54-3 Hexane, N- 1.1 0.033 - 1.5E+02 4.5E-05
591-78-6 Hexanone, 2- 3.5 0.105 - 6.3E+00 3.4E-03
67-63-0 Isopropanol 23.1 0.693 - 4.2E+01 3.3E-03
78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 5.71 0.1713 - 1.0E+03 3.3E-05
108-10-1 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone) 1.18 0.0354 - 6.3E+02 1.1E-05
75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.986 0.02958 1.0E+02 1.3E+02 2.9E-10 4.7E-05
91-20-3 ~Naphthalene 2.75 0.0825 8.3E-02 6.3E-01 1.0E-06 2.6E-02
115-07-1 Propylene 21 0.63 - 6.3E+02 2.0E-04
100-42-5 Styrene 0.741 0.02223 - 2.1E+02 2.1E-05
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 6670 200.1 1.1E+01 8.3E+00 1.9E-05 4.8E+00
108-88-3 Toluene 4.02 0.1206 - 1.0E+03 2.3E-05
71-55-6 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- 1.86 0.0558 - 1.0E+03 1.1E-05
79-01-6 Trichloroethylene 1.54 0.0462 4.8E-01 4.2E-01 9.7E-08 2.2E-02
75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 1.43 0.0429 - -
95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4- 4.42 0.1326 - 1.3E+01 2.1E-03
108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5- 1.32 0.0396 - 1.3E+01 6.3E-04
1330-20-7 Xylenes 25.3 0.759 - 2.1E+01 7.3E-03
Cumulative: 2.0E-05 4.9E+00
All concentrations are in ug/m3
Output Form 3B
Carcinogenic risk and hazard quotient cells highlighted in orange are associated with non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion
risk, no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
DEQ Risk Calculator - Vapor Intrusion - Non-Residential Worker Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Version Date: January 2022
Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Building 3 Soil Gas (SSV-2/SSV-DUP, SSV-3, and SSV-4)
CAS # Chemical Name:
Soil Gas
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Calculated
Indoor Air
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Target Indoor
Air Conc. for
Carcinogens @
TCR = 1E-06
Target Indoor Air
Conc. for Non-
Carcinogens @
THQ = 0.2
Calculated
Carcinogenic
Risk
Calculated
Non-
Carcinogenic
Hazard
Quotient
67-64-1 Acetone 42.6 0.426 - -
71-43-2 Benzene 0.668 0.00668 1.6E+00 2.6E+01 4.2E-09 5.1E-05
75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide 2.29 0.0229 - 6.1E+02 7.5E-06
110-82-7 Cyclohexane 6.91 0.0691 - 5.3E+03 2.6E-06
75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.79 0.0279 - 8.8E+01 6.4E-05
123-91-1 Dioxane, 1,4- 4.04 0.0404 2.5E+00 2.6E+01 1.6E-08 3.1E-04
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 2.09 0.0209 4.9E+00 8.8E+02 4.3E-09 4.8E-06
109-99-9 ~Tetrahydrofuran 0.779 0.00779 - 1.8E+03 8.9E-07
142-82-5 Heptane, N- 0.533 0.00533 - 3.5E+02 3.0E-06
110-54-3 Hexane, N- 1.1 0.011 - 6.1E+02 3.6E-06
591-78-6 Hexanone, 2- 3.5 0.035 - 2.6E+01 2.7E-04
67-63-0 Isopropanol 23.1 0.231 - 1.8E+02 2.6E-04
78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 5.71 0.0571 - 4.4E+03 2.6E-06
108-10-1 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone) 1.18 0.0118 - 2.6E+03 9.0E-07
75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.986 0.00986 1.2E+03 5.3E+02 8.0E-12 3.8E-06
91-20-3 ~Naphthalene 2.75 0.0275 3.6E-01 2.6E+00 7.6E-08 2.1E-03
115-07-1 Propylene 21 0.21 - 2.6E+03 1.6E-05
100-42-5 Styrene 0.741 0.00741 - 8.8E+02 1.7E-06
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 6670 66.7 4.7E+01 3.5E+01 1.4E-06 3.8E-01
108-88-3 Toluene 4.02 0.0402 - 4.4E+03 1.8E-06
71-55-6 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- 1.86 0.0186 - 4.4E+03 8.5E-07
79-01-6 Trichloroethylene 1.54 0.0154 3.0E+00 1.8E+00 5.1E-09 1.8E-03
75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 1.43 0.0143 - -
95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4- 4.42 0.0442 - 5.3E+01 1.7E-04
108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5- 1.32 0.0132 - 5.3E+01 5.0E-05
1330-20-7 Xylenes 25.3 0.253 - 8.8E+01 5.8E-04
Cumulative: 1.5E-06 3.9E-01
All concentrations are in ug/m3
Output Form
Carcinogenic risk and hazard quotient cells highlighted in orange are associated with non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion risk,
no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Version Date:
Basis:
Site Name:
Site Address:
DEQ Section:
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID:
Submittal Date:
Reviewed By:
Prepared By:LES
HHM
Building 4 Soil Gas (SSV-5 and SSV-6
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Risk Calculator
Harrelson Ford
6500 South Boulevard, Charlotte, NC
January 2022
November 2021 EPA RSL Table
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Complete Exposure Pathways
Version Date: January 2022
Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Building 4 Soil Gas (SSV-5 and SSV-6
Note: Risk output will only be calculated for complete exposure pathways.
Receptor Pathway
Check box if
pathway
complete
Soil
Groundwater Use
Soil
Groundwater Use
Construction Worker Soil
Soil
Surface Water
Groundwater to Indoor Air
Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Indoor Air
Groundwater to Indoor Air
Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Indoor Air
Source Soil
Source Groundwater
Source Soil
Source Groundwater
Input Form 1A
VAPOR INTRUSION PATHWAYS
DIRECT CONTACT SOIL AND WATER PATHWAYS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
Recreator/Trespasser
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
CONTAMINANT MIGRATION PATHWAYS
Groundwater
Surface Water
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Exposure Point ConcentrationsVersion Date: January 2022Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL TableSite ID: Exposure Unit ID: Building 4 Soil Gas (SSV-5 and SSV-6Description of Exposure Point Concentration Selection:Exposure Point Concentration (ug/m3)Notes: CAS Number ChemicalMinimum Concentration (Qualifier)Maximum Concentration (Qualifier)UnitsLocation of Maximum ConcentrationDetection FrequencyRange of Detection LimitsConcentration Used for ScreeningBackground ValueScreening Toxicity Value (Screening Level) (n/c)Potential ARAR/TBC ValuePotential ARAR/TBC SourceCOPC Flag (Y/N)Rationale for Selection or Deletion398 67-64-1 Acetoneug/m335.971-43-2Benzeneug/m322.1106-99-0Butadiene, 1,3-ug/m325.975-15-0Carbon Disulfideug/m30.42567-66-3Chloroformug/m372110-82-7Cyclohexaneug/m31.67106-46-7Dichlorobenzene, 1,4-ug/m32.6275-71-8Dichlorodifluoromethaneug/m313,500156-59-2Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2-ug/m3132156-60-5Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2-ug/m312.175-00-3Ethyl Chloride (Chloroethane)ug/m361.6100-41-4Ethylbenzeneug/m323.8142-82-5Heptane, N-ug/m350.3110-54-3Hexane, N-ug/m33.93591-78-6Hexanone, 2-ug/m361.267-63-0Isopropanolug/m315.978-93-3Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)ug/m34.48108-10-1Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone)ug/m32521634-04-4Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)ug/m30.93875-09-2Methylene Chlorideug/m3393115-07-1Propyleneug/m30.835100-42-5Styreneug/m3647127-18-4Tetrachloroethyleneug/m3224108-88-3Tolueneug/m326.979-01-6Trichloroethyleneug/m31.3375-69-4Trichlorofluoromethaneug/m32.9195-63-6Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-ug/m30.732108-67-8Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-ug/m31170075-01-4Vinyl Chlorideug/m33021330-20-7Xylenesug/m3Input Form 2DSoil Gas Exposure Point Concentration TableNote: Chemicals highlighted in orange are non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion risk, no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.If the chemical list is changed from a prior calculator run, remember to select "See All Chemicals" on the data output sheet or newly added chemicals will not be included in risk calculationsNorth Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Risk for Individual Pathways Output Form 1A
Version Date: January 2022
Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Building 4 Soil Gas (SSV-5 and SSV-6
Receptor Pathway Carcinogenic
Risk Hazard Index Risk exceeded?
Soil NC NC NC
Groundwater Use*NC NC NC
Soil NC NC NC
Groundwater Use*NC NC NC
Construction Worker Soil NC NC NC
Soil NC NC NC
Surface Water*NC NC NC
Receptor Pathway Carcinogenic
Risk Hazard Index Risk exceeded?
Groundwater to Indoor Air NC NC NC
Soil Gas to Indoor Air 2.1E-03 5.6E+00 YES
Indoor Air NC NC NC
Groundwater to Indoor Air NC NC NC
Soil Gas to Indoor Air 4.3E-05 4.5E-01 NO
Indoor Air NC NC NC
Pathway Source
Source Soil NC
Source Groundwater NC
Source Soil NC
Source Groundwater NC
3. NM = Not Modeled
4. NC = Pathway not calculated
DIRECT CONTACT SOIL AND WATER CALCULATORS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
Recreator/Trespasser
2. * = If concentrations in groundwater exceed the NC 2L Standards or IMAC, or concentrations in surface water exceed the
NC 2B Standards, appropriate remediation and/or institutional control measures will be necessary to be eligible for a risk-based
closure.
Surface Water Exceedence of 2B at Receptor?
Exceedence of 2B at Receptor?
VAPOR INTRUSION CALCULATORS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
CONTAMINANT MIGRATION CALCULATORS
Target Receptor Concentrations Exceeded?
Groundwater Exceedence of 2L at Receptor?
Exceedence of 2L at Receptor?
1. If lead concentrations were entered in the exposure point concentration tables, see the individual calculator sheets for lead
concentrations in comparison to screening levels. Note that lead is not included in cumulative risk calculations.
Notes:
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
DEQ Risk Calculator - Vapor Intrusion - Resident Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Version Date: January 2022
Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Building 4 Soil Gas (SSV-5 and SSV-6
CAS #Chemical Name:
Soil Gas
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Calculated
Indoor Air
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Target Indoor
Air Conc. for
Carcinogens @
TCR = 1E-06
Target Indoor Air
Conc. for Non-
Carcinogens @
THQ = 0.2
Calculated
Carcinogenic
Risk
Calculated
Non-
Carcinogenic
Hazard
Quotient
67-64-1 Acetone 398 11.94 - -
71-43-2 Benzene 35.9 1.077 3.6E-01 6.3E+00 3.0E-06 3.4E-02
106-99-0 Butadiene, 1,3- 22.1 0.663 9.4E-02 4.2E-01 7.1E-06 3.2E-01
75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide 25.9 0.777 - 1.5E+02 1.1E-03
67-66-3 Chloroform 0.425 0.01275 1.2E-01 2.0E+01 1.0E-07 1.2E-04
110-82-7 Cyclohexane 72 2.16 - 1.3E+03 3.5E-04
106-46-7 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- 1.67 0.0501 2.6E-01 1.7E+02 2.0E-07 6.0E-05
75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.62 0.0786 - 2.1E+01 7.5E-04
156-59-2 Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2- 13500 405 - -
156-60-5 Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2- 132 3.96 - 8.3E+00 9.5E-02
75-00-3 Ethyl Chloride (Chloroethane) 12.1 0.363 - 8.3E+02 8.7E-05
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 61.6 1.848 1.1E+00 2.1E+02 1.6E-06 1.8E-03
142-82-5 Heptane, N- 23.8 0.714 - 8.3E+01 1.7E-03
110-54-3 Hexane, N- 50.3 1.509 - 1.5E+02 2.1E-03
591-78-6 Hexanone, 2- 3.93 0.1179 - 6.3E+00 3.8E-03
67-63-0 Isopropanol 61.2 1.836 - 4.2E+01 8.8E-03
78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 15.9 0.477 - 1.0E+03 9.1E-05
108-10-1 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone) 4.48 0.1344 - 6.3E+02 4.3E-05
1634-04-4 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 252 7.56 1.1E+01 6.3E+02 7.0E-07 2.4E-03
75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.938 0.02814 1.0E+02 1.3E+02 2.8E-10 4.5E-05
115-07-1 Propylene 393 11.79 - 6.3E+02 3.8E-03
100-42-5 Styrene 0.835 0.02505 - 2.1E+02 2.4E-05
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 647 19.41 1.1E+01 8.3E+00 1.8E-06 4.7E-01
108-88-3 Toluene 224 6.72 - 1.0E+03 1.3E-03
79-01-6 Trichloroethylene 26.9 0.807 4.8E-01 4.2E-01 1.7E-06 3.9E-01
75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 1.33 0.0399 - -
95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4- 2.91 0.0873 - 1.3E+01 1.4E-03
108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5- 0.732 0.02196 - 1.3E+01 3.5E-04
75-01-4 Vinyl Chloride 11700 351 1.7E-01 1.7E+01 2.1E-03 4.2E+00
1330-20-7 Xylenes 302 9.06 - 2.1E+01 8.7E-02
Cumulative:2.1E-03 5.6E+00
All concentrations are in ug/m3
Output Form 3B
Carcinogenic risk and hazard quotient cells highlighted in orange are associated with non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion
risk, no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
DEQ Risk Calculator - Vapor Intrusion - Non-Residential Worker Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Version Date: January 2022
Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Building 4 Soil Gas (SSV-5 and SSV-6
CAS # Chemical Name:
Soil Gas
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Calculated
Indoor Air
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Target Indoor
Air Conc. for
Carcinogens @
TCR = 1E-06
Target Indoor Air
Conc. for Non-
Carcinogens @
THQ = 0.2
Calculated
Carcinogenic
Risk
Calculated
Non-
Carcinogenic
Hazard
Quotient
67-64-1 Acetone 398 3.98 - -
71-43-2 Benzene 35.9 0.359 1.6E+00 2.6E+01 2.3E-07 2.7E-03
106-99-0 Butadiene, 1,3- 22.1 0.221 4.1E-01 1.8E+00 5.4E-07 2.5E-02
75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide 25.9 0.259 - 6.1E+02 8.4E-05
67-66-3 Chloroform 0.425 0.00425 5.3E-01 8.6E+01 8.0E-09 9.9E-06
110-82-7 Cyclohexane 72 0.72 - 5.3E+03 2.7E-05
106-46-7 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- 1.67 0.0167 1.1E+00 7.0E+02 1.5E-08 4.8E-06
75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.62 0.0262 - 8.8E+01 6.0E-05
156-59-2 Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2- 13500 135 - -
156-60-5 Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2- 132 1.32 - 3.5E+01 7.5E-03
75-00-3 Ethyl Chloride (Chloroethane) 12.1 0.121 - 3.5E+03 6.9E-06
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 61.6 0.616 4.9E+00 8.8E+02 1.3E-07 1.4E-04
142-82-5 Heptane, N- 23.8 0.238 - 3.5E+02 1.4E-04
110-54-3 Hexane, N- 50.3 0.503 - 6.1E+02 1.6E-04
591-78-6 Hexanone, 2- 3.93 0.0393 - 2.6E+01 3.0E-04
67-63-0 Isopropanol 61.2 0.612 - 1.8E+02 7.0E-04
78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 15.9 0.159 - 4.4E+03 7.3E-06
108-10-1 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone) 4.48 0.0448 - 2.6E+03 3.4E-06
1634-04-4 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) 252 2.52 4.7E+01 2.6E+03 5.3E-08 1.9E-04
75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.938 0.00938 1.2E+03 5.3E+02 7.6E-12 3.6E-06
115-07-1 Propylene 393 3.93 - 2.6E+03 3.0E-04
100-42-5 Styrene 0.835 0.00835 - 8.8E+02 1.9E-06
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 647 6.47 4.7E+01 3.5E+01 1.4E-07 3.7E-02
108-88-3 Toluene 224 2.24 - 4.4E+03 1.0E-04
79-01-6 Trichloroethylene 26.9 0.269 3.0E+00 1.8E+00 9.0E-08 3.1E-02
75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 1.33 0.0133 - -
95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4- 2.91 0.0291 - 5.3E+01 1.1E-04
108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5- 0.732 0.00732 - 5.3E+01 2.8E-05
75-01-4 Vinyl Chloride 11700 117 2.8E+00 7.0E+01 4.2E-05 3.3E-01
1330-20-7 Xylenes 302 3.02 - 8.8E+01 6.9E-03
Cumulative: 4.3E-05 4.5E-01
All concentrations are in ug/m3
Output Form
Carcinogenic risk and hazard quotient cells highlighted in orange are associated with non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion risk,
no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Version Date:
Basis:
Site Name:
Site Address:
DEQ Section:
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID:
Submittal Date:
Reviewed By:
Prepared By:LES
HHM
Exterior Soil Gas (SG-16)
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Risk Calculator
Harrelson Ford
6500 South Boulevard, Charlotte, NC
January 2022
November 2021 EPA RSL Table
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Complete Exposure Pathways
Version Date: January 2022
Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Exterior Soil Gas (SG-16)
Note: Risk output will only be calculated for complete exposure pathways.
Receptor Pathway
Check box if
pathway
complete
Soil
Groundwater Use
Soil
Groundwater Use
Construction Worker Soil
Soil
Surface Water
Groundwater to Indoor Air
Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Indoor Air
Groundwater to Indoor Air
Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Indoor Air
Source Soil
Source Groundwater
Source Soil
Source Groundwater
Input Form 1A
VAPOR INTRUSION PATHWAYS
DIRECT CONTACT SOIL AND WATER PATHWAYS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
Recreator/Trespasser
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
CONTAMINANT MIGRATION PATHWAYS
Groundwater
Surface Water
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Exposure Point ConcentrationsVersion Date: January 2022Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL TableSite ID: Exposure Unit ID: Exterior Soil Gas (SG-16)Description of Exposure Point Concentration Selection:Exposure Point Concentration (ug/m3)Notes: CAS Number ChemicalMinimum Concentration (Qualifier)Maximum Concentration (Qualifier)UnitsLocation of Maximum ConcentrationDetection FrequencyRange of Detection LimitsConcentration Used for ScreeningBackground ValueScreening Toxicity Value (Screening Level) (n/c)Potential ARAR/TBC ValuePotential ARAR/TBC SourceCOPC Flag (Y/N)Rationale for Selection or Deletion72.5 67-64-1 Acetoneug/m320.9 71-43-2 Benzeneug/m312 75-15-0 Carbon Disulfideug/m31.26 56-23-5 Carbon Tetrachlorideug/m30.977 74-87-3 Chloromethaneug/m321.1 110-82-7 Cyclohexaneug/m33.16 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethaneug/m315.8 100-41-4 Ethylbenzeneug/m31.57 109-99-9 ~Tetrahydrofuranug/m326.1 142-82-5 Heptane, N-ug/m357 110-54-3 Hexane, N-ug/m315.6 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)ug/m33.56 108-10-1 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone)ug/m32.17 75-09-2 Methylene Chlorideug/m32.91 91-20-3 ~Naphthaleneug/m3152 115-07-1 Propyleneug/m31.58 100-42-5 Styreneug/m32.44 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethyleneug/m3259 108-88-3 Tolueneug/m31.12 76-13-1 Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane, 1,1,2-ug/m32.57 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethaneug/m35.67 95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-ug/m31.97 108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-ug/m370.2 1330-20-7 Xylenesug/m3Input Form 2DSoil Gas Exposure Point Concentration TableNote: Chemicals highlighted in orange are non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion risk, no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.If the chemical list is changed from a prior calculator run, remember to select "See All Chemicals" on the data output sheet or newly added chemicals will not be included in risk calculationsNorth Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Risk for Individual Pathways Output Form 1A
Version Date: January 2022
Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Exterior Soil Gas (SG-16)
Receptor Pathway
Carcinogenic
Risk Hazard Index Risk exceeded?
Soil NC NC NC
Groundwater Use* NC NC NC
Soil NC NC NC
Groundwater Use* NC NC NC
Construction Worker Soil NC NC NC
Soil NC NC NC
Surface Water* NC NC NC
Receptor Pathway
Carcinogenic
Risk Hazard Index Risk exceeded?
Groundwater to Indoor Air NC NC NC
Soil Gas to Indoor Air 3.3E-06 8.4E-02 NO
Indoor Air NC NC NC
Groundwater to Indoor Air NC NC NC
Soil Gas to Indoor Air 2.5E-07 6.6E-03 NO
Indoor Air NC NC NC
Pathway Source
Source Soil NC
Source Groundwater NC
Source Soil NC
Source Groundwater NC
3. NM = Not Modeled
4. NC = Pathway not calculated
DIRECT CONTACT SOIL AND WATER CALCULATORS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
Recreator/Trespasser
2. * = If concentrations in groundwater exceed the NC 2L Standards or IMAC, or concentrations in surface water exceed the
NC 2B Standards, appropriate remediation and/or institutional control measures will be necessary to be eligible for a risk-based
closure.
Surface Water Exceedence of 2B at Receptor?
Exceedence of 2B at Receptor?
VAPOR INTRUSION CALCULATORS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
CONTAMINANT MIGRATION CALCULATORS
Target Receptor Concentrations Exceeded?
Groundwater Exceedence of 2L at Receptor?
Exceedence of 2L at Receptor?
1. If lead concentrations were entered in the exposure point concentration tables, see the individual calculator sheets for lead
concentrations in comparison to screening levels. Note that lead is not included in cumulative risk calculations.
Notes:
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
DEQ Risk Calculator - Vapor Intrusion - Resident Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Version Date: January 2022
Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Exterior Soil Gas (SG-16)
CAS # Chemical Name:
Soil Gas
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Calculated
Indoor Air
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Target Indoor
Air Conc. for
Carcinogens @
TCR = 1E-06
Target Indoor Air
Conc. for Non-
Carcinogens @
THQ = 0.2
Calculated
Carcinogenic
Risk
Calculated
Non-
Carcinogenic
Hazard
Quotient
67-64-1 Acetone 72.5 2.175 - -
71-43-2 Benzene 20.9 0.627 3.6E-01 6.3E+00 1.7E-06 2.0E-02
75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide 12 0.36 - 1.5E+02 4.9E-04
56-23-5 Carbon Tetrachloride 1.26 0.0378 4.7E-01 2.1E+01 8.1E-08 3.6E-04
74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.977 0.02931 - 1.9E+01 3.1E-04
110-82-7 Cyclohexane 21.1 0.633 - 1.3E+03 1.0E-04
75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.16 0.0948 - 2.1E+01 9.1E-04
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 15.8 0.474 1.1E+00 2.1E+02 4.2E-07 4.5E-04
109-99-9 ~Tetrahydrofuran 1.57 0.0471 - 4.2E+02 2.3E-05
142-82-5 Heptane, N- 26.1 0.783 - 8.3E+01 1.9E-03
110-54-3 Hexane, N- 57 1.71 - 1.5E+02 2.3E-03
78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 15.6 0.468 - 1.0E+03 9.0E-05
108-10-1 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone) 3.56 0.1068 - 6.3E+02 3.4E-05
75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 2.17 0.0651 1.0E+02 1.3E+02 6.4E-10 1.0E-04
91-20-3 ~Naphthalene 2.91 0.0873 8.3E-02 6.3E-01 1.1E-06 2.8E-02
115-07-1 Propylene 152 4.56 - 6.3E+02 1.5E-03
100-42-5 Styrene 1.58 0.0474 - 2.1E+02 4.5E-05
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 2.44 0.0732 1.1E+01 8.3E+00 6.8E-09 1.8E-03
108-88-3 Toluene 259 7.77 - 1.0E+03 1.5E-03
76-13-1 Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane, 1,1,2- 1.12 0.0336 - 1.0E+03 6.4E-06
75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 2.57 0.0771 - -
95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4- 5.67 0.1701 - 1.3E+01 2.7E-03
108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5- 1.97 0.0591 - 1.3E+01 9.4E-04
1330-20-7 Xylenes 70.2 2.106 - 2.1E+01 2.0E-02
Cumulative: 3.3E-06 8.4E-02
All concentrations are in ug/m3
Output Form 3B
Carcinogenic risk and hazard quotient cells highlighted in orange are associated with non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion
risk, no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
DEQ Risk Calculator - Vapor Intrusion - Non-Residential Worker Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Version Date: January 2022
Basis: November 2021 EPA RSL Table
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID: Exterior Soil Gas (SG-16)
CAS # Chemical Name:
Soil Gas
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Calculated
Indoor Air
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Target Indoor
Air Conc. for
Carcinogens @
TCR = 1E-06
Target Indoor Air
Conc. for Non-
Carcinogens @
THQ = 0.2
Calculated
Carcinogenic
Risk
Calculated
Non-
Carcinogenic
Hazard
Quotient
67-64-1 Acetone 72.5 0.725 - -
71-43-2 Benzene 20.9 0.209 1.6E+00 2.6E+01 1.3E-07 1.6E-03
75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide 12 0.12 - 6.1E+02 3.9E-05
56-23-5 Carbon Tetrachloride 1.26 0.0126 2.0E+00 8.8E+01 6.2E-09 2.9E-05
74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.977 0.00977 - 7.9E+01 2.5E-05
110-82-7 Cyclohexane 21.1 0.211 - 5.3E+03 8.0E-06
75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.16 0.0316 - 8.8E+01 7.2E-05
100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 15.8 0.158 4.9E+00 8.8E+02 3.2E-08 3.6E-05
109-99-9 ~Tetrahydrofuran 1.57 0.0157 - 1.8E+03 1.8E-06
142-82-5 Heptane, N- 26.1 0.261 - 3.5E+02 1.5E-04
110-54-3 Hexane, N- 57 0.57 - 6.1E+02 1.9E-04
78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 15.6 0.156 - 4.4E+03 7.1E-06
108-10-1 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone) 3.56 0.0356 - 2.6E+03 2.7E-06
75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 2.17 0.0217 1.2E+03 5.3E+02 1.8E-11 8.3E-06
91-20-3 ~Naphthalene 2.91 0.0291 3.6E-01 2.6E+00 8.1E-08 2.2E-03
115-07-1 Propylene 152 1.52 - 2.6E+03 1.2E-04
100-42-5 Styrene 1.58 0.0158 - 8.8E+02 3.6E-06
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 2.44 0.0244 4.7E+01 3.5E+01 5.2E-10 1.4E-04
108-88-3 Toluene 259 2.59 - 4.4E+03 1.2E-04
76-13-1 Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane, 1,1,2- 1.12 0.0112 - 4.4E+03 5.1E-07
75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 2.57 0.0257 - -
95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4- 5.67 0.0567 - 5.3E+01 2.2E-04
108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5- 1.97 0.0197 - 5.3E+01 7.5E-05
1330-20-7 Xylenes 70.2 0.702 - 8.8E+01 1.6E-03
Cumulative: 2.5E-07 6.6E-03
All concentrations are in ug/m3
Output Form
Carcinogenic risk and hazard quotient cells highlighted in orange are associated with non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion risk,
no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator