21050_South Saunders Street Assemblage_EMP_12082021_BF SIGNED

Environmental Management Plan
South Saunders Street Assemblage
Brownfields Project No. 21050-17-092
South Saunders Street,
Raleigh, North Carolina
H&H Job No. KCO-001
December 8, 2021
hart � hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
#C-1269 Engineering
#C-245 Geology
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3921 Sunset Ridge Rd, Suite 301
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www,harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919.847.4241 main

Completed EMP Template Form
CONTENTS
Tables
Table 1
Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Data
Table 2
Summary of Soil Analytical Data
Table 3
Summary of Well Construction Details & Groundwater Elevation Data
Table 4
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data
Table 5
Summary of Surface Water Analytical Data
Table 6
Summary of Sediment Analytical Data
Table 7
Summary of TCLP Analytical Data
Figures
Figure 1
Site Location Map
Figure 2
Site Map
Figure 3
Sample Location Map
Figure 4
Cut -Fill Sample Location Map
Appendices
Appendix A Redevelopment Plans
Appendix B Grading Plan and Cut -Fill Analysis
Appendix C Utility Plan
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in the
North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.
The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory -compliant
decision -making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP, including
contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have questions.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development -related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project, and
approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of the
EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be cause for
a reopener.
The EMP is valid only for the scope of work described herein and must be updated to be
applicable for new phases of redevelopment or after significant changes in applicable
regulatory guidance.
Voluntary Metrics Tab
The NC Brownfields Program updates estimated capital investment (from the Brownfields
Property Application) and estimated jobs created (from the Brownfields Agreement) whenever
possible. As a voluntary measure, you may opt to complete the below information for capital
investment and jobs created as estimated by your final redevelopment plans for the Brownfields
Property:
1. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: Approximately $120M
2. Estimated jobs created:
a. Construction Jobs: 200
b. Full Time Post -Redevelopment Jobs: To be determined
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Table of Contents
NORTH CAROLINA BROWN FIELDS PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................... 1
GENERALINFORMATION........................................................................................................................
4
COMMUNICATIONS................................................................................................................................
4
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM...............................................................................
5
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS........................................................................................................................
5
CONTAMINATEDMEDIA.........................................................................................................................
7
PART1. Soil.........................................................................................................................................
8
PART 2. GROUNDWATER.................................................................................................................
20
PART 3. SURFACE WATER..................................................................................................................
22
PART 4. SEDIMENT............................................................................................................................
23
PART5. SOIL VAPOR.........................................................................................................................
23
PART 6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR........................................................................................................
24
PART 7. INDOOR AIR.........................................................................................................................
25
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM.............................................................................................
25
CONTINGENCY PLAN — encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials .....................
26
POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING.....................................................................................................
29
APPROVAL SIGNATURES.......................................................................................................................
30
EMP Version 2, January 2021

So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.
® Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields' objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.
® Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant and
applicable to the proposed redevelopment:
M A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.
M A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.
® Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.
❑ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain on
site after construction grading.
❑ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).
❑ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.
® Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas, etc.)
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
® Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
❑ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.
❑ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.
❑ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.
EMP Version 2, January 2021

❑ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.
❑ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export and
sampling data from those areas.
® If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor Intrusion
Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer.
The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.
Date: 12/8/2021
GENERAL INFORMATION
Revision Date (if applicable): Click or tap to enter a date.
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: South Saunders Street Assemblage
Brownfields Project Number: 21050-17-092
Brownfields Property Address: South Saunders Street, Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina (Figure 1)
Brownfields Property Area (acres): 9.15 acres
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ....................... ❑ Yes ® No
If yes enter Permit No.: -i" -i, - i— , horn to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit ............ ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
COMMUNICATIONS
A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE -SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.
Prospective Developer (PD): Kane Realty Corporation
Contact Person: Mr. Drew Yates
Phone Numbers: Office: Click or tap hereto enter text. Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Contractor for PD: Samet Corporation
Contact Person: Maria Houle
Phone Numbers: Office: Click or tap hereto enter text. Mobile: [phone]
Email: :lick or tap here to enter text.
4
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC
Contact Person: Mr. Justin Ballard
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
Email: iballard(@harthickman.com
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Kelly Johnson
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
k or tap here
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsitetask:
On -site assessment or remedial activities: .................................................... 10 days Prior
Construction or grading start: .......................................................................... 10 days Prior
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ................................................................................ Within 48 hours
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones): ................................... Within 48 hours
Installation of mitigation systems: ................................................................ 10 days Prior
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ................................................................................. Within 30 days
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
©Residential ©Recreational El Institutional ®Commercial ®Office ®Retail ❑ Industrial
©Other specify:
Parking, Open Space
2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth -moving activities
at the site:
EMP Version 2, January 2021

® Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
❑ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
❑ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
Redevelopment plans for the central and northern portions of the Brownfields property include
razing the existing Site buildings (including in the southern portion of the Site) and construction of
four connected multi -use buildings with ground floor commercial, retail, office, amenity space,
and/or parking, and upper -level residential spaces with the exception of the building located in
the southeastern portion of the Site. The southeastern building is proposed for residential use is
and is located in a fill area. See the Contaminated Media Section for details regarding cut/fill
information. In summary, the proposed redevelopment consists of up to 11 stories that total
approximately 371,640 gross square feet (sq ft). A copy of the current redevelopment Site plan is
included in Appendix A.
Once details associated with redevelopment plans for the southern portion of the Brownfields
property are available, those plans will be provided to the DEQ Brownfields Program for review. If
warranted based upon DEQ's review, a revised EMP will be prepared for the southern portion of
the Site.
4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
® If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please provide
a copy of your demolition permit.
5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
® If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.
6) Which category of risk -based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
® Residential ❑ Non -Residential or Industrial/Commercial
7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
EMP Version 2, January 2021

a) Construction start date: 11/29/2021
b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
Redevelopment activities are expected to take up to approximately 28 months (i.e., Q1 2024)
to complete. As previously mentioned, if warranted based upon DEQs review, a revised EMP
will be prepared for the southern portion of the Site
c) Additional phases planned? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: 10/1/2022
Planned Activity:
Possible additional phases of redevelopment include new construction in the southern
portion of the Brownfields property.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter te"'
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 11/1/2023
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Please fill out the sections below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas of
contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure overlaying new construction
onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil: ..............................................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 2. Groundwater: ............................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 3. Surface Water: ..........................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 4. Sediment: ...................................................
©
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ..................................................
❑
Yes
❑ No
® Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 6. Sub -Slab Soil Vapor: ..................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 7. Indoor Air: ...................................................
❑
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
® Unknown
2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.
EMP Version 2, January 2021

PART 1. Soil
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
Soil sampling has been completed at the Brownfields property as part of assessment activities
documented in Hart & Hickman, P.C.'s (H&H's) Brownfields Assessment Report dated March 17,
2020. A tabular summary of the soil analytical data in comparison to the DEQ's Inactive Hazardous
Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) is included as Table 1 and soil
sample locations are shown in Figure 2. A brief summary of the soil assessment results is included
below.
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Laboratory analytical results indicated low levels of several VOCs were detected in soil samples
above laboratory reporting limits, but below their respective Residential PSRGs.
Semi -Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
Laboratory analytical results indicated SVOCs benz(a)anthracene (13.6 milligrams per kilogram
[mg/kg] in SB-7 and 5.4 mg/kg in SB-9), benzo(b)fluoranthene (16.9 mg/kg in SB-7 and 6.3 mg/kg
in SB-9), and indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (9.2 mg/kg in SB-7 and 2.5 mg/kg in SB-9) were detected at
concentrations above the Residential PSRGs. In addition, benzo(a)pyrene (13.3 mg/kg in SB-7 and
4.6 mg/kg in SB-9) was detected at concentrations above the Industrial/Commercial PSRG. No
other SVOCs were detected at concentrations above their respective Residential PSRGs.
Metals
As expected, naturally occurring levels of several metals were detected at concentrations above
laboratory reporting limits. Of the metals detected, arsenic was detected at concentrations up to
9.84 mg/kg in the soil sample collected from SB-11, which is above the Industrial/Commercial
PSRG, but within published background levels for North Carolina soils. In addition, hexavalent
chromium was detected at concentrations up to 4.85 mg/kg in soil sample SB-9, which is above
the Residential PSRG.
Results of soil assessment activities indicated that lead was detected in soil samples SB-4 (1,870
mg/kg), SB-7 (723 mg/kg) and SB-11 (1,320 mg/kg) at concentrations above the DEQ Residential
and/or Industrial/Commercial PSRG, Site -specific background levels, and toxicity characteristic
leaching procedure (TCLP) criteria using the Rule of 20. Results of TCLP analyses indicated that
the leachate concentrations for soil samples SB-4, SB-7, and SB-11 do not exceed toxicity
characteristic levels for lead or any other Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metal.
A summary of TCLP laboratory analytical results is included in Table 7.
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
1 to 6 ft below ground surface (bgs)
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
8
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Based on the preliminary site plan and grading plan (Appendices A and B, respectively), up to
approximately 248,549 sq ft is expected to be disturbed during redevelopment activities.
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
Grading activities are generally expected to include areas of cut up to approximately 7 ft bgs,
excavations of up to approximately 7 ft bgs for installation of stormwater management
infrastructure, and excavations of 7 ft or less in other redevelopment areas. A grading plan and
cut -fill analysis, and utility plan are included in Appendices B and C, respectively.
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
Grading activities are generally expected to include excavation of approximately 2,300 cubic yards
(cy) of soil, which will be re -used on -Site as beneficial fill. A grading plan and cut -fill analysis is
included in Appendix B.
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
If impacted soil is encountered, it will be managed as noted in Part 1.A.
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
Excavation of impacted soil for off -Site disposal is not anticipated; however, if warranted, export
soil will be managed in accordance with Part 1.C. of this EMP.
Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated fromthe Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminarydata available).
1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINAT
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous Waste
Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ❑Yes ®No
❑ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ If yes, do the soils exceed the "Contained -Out" levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained -In Policy? ................................................. ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED -OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED -IN POLICYTHE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
EMP Version 2, January 2021

DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE? .................................... ❑ Yes ® No
❑ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
❑ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
© If no, explain rationale:
Results of soil assessment activities indicated that lead was detected in soil
samples S13-4 (1,870 mg/kg), S13-7 (723 mg/kg) and SB-11 (1,320 mg/kg) at
concentrations above TCLP criteria using the Rule of 20. However, results of
TCLP analyses indicated that the leachate concentrations for soil samples S13-4,
S13-7, and SB-11 do not exceed toxicity characteristic levels for lead or any other
RCRA metal.
d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAYNOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH
DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
® Preliminary Health -Based Residential SRGs
❑ Preliminary Health -Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
® Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
❑ Site -specific risk -based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Click or tap here to enter text.
Additional comments:
Click or tap here to enter text.
3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary, please
check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of same.
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
❑ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
® Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map to
Brownfields Project Manager once known
❑ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
Click or tap here to enter text.
® Manage soil under impervious cap ® or clean fill
® Describe cap or fill:
Should impacted soil be encountered during redevelopment, the potentially impacted soil
will be concentrated with other potentially impacted soils in non-recreational/open space
areas and placed beneath impervious surfaces (asphalt pavement, sidewalks, access roads,
buildings, etc.), or a minimum of 2 ft of clean fill, with both scenarios involving notification of
placement of potentially impacted soil to DEQ. As it pertains to soils associated with samples
which exceed DEQ Residential and/or Industrial PSRGs and Site -specific and/or published
background ranges for North Carolina soils (i.e., S13-4, S13-7, S13-9, and S13-11), these soils are
located in areas of proposed fill, insignificant cut, and/or beneath future impervious surfaces
(Figure 4).
❑ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re -recorded if
actions are Post -Recordation).
® GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
❑ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:
Click or tap here to enter text.
4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
® Yes, describe the method will include:
The grading contractor will consider conditions such as wind speed, wind direction, and
moisture content of soil during grading and stockpiling (if warranted) activities to minimize
dust generation. In the unlikely event that contaminated soil is encountered during Site
redevelopment that requires excavation, particular attention will be paid by contractors to
implement dust control measures as needed based on Site and atmospheric conditions (i.e.,
by controlled water application, hydro -seeding, and/or mulch, stone, or plastic cover).
Should dust control measures be warranted, the contractor will contact the project
environmental professional and the project environmental professional will contact the DEQ
11
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Brownfields project manager within two business days to advise that person of the
condition. Potentially impacted soil will be managed as described below.
❑ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Field Screening of site soil
® Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
During soil disturbance at the Site, the workers or contractors will observe soils for evidence
of potential impacted soil, such as a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or
previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e., chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the
above be noted during Site work, the contractor will contact the project environmental
professional to observe the suspect condition. If the project environmental professional
confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures below will be
implemented. In addition, the environmental professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields
project manager within two business days to advise that person of the condition.
During disturbance of soils in the vicinity of samples SB-4, SB-7, SB-9, and SB-11, the project
environmental professional will be on -Site to observe grading activities.
❑ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Soil Sample Collection
❑ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in -situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
Click or tap here to enter text.
® No, explain rationale:
Collection of additional soil samples is not anticipated based on results of previous Site
assessment activities. If significant soil impact is encountered during grading and/or
installation or removal of utilities, excavation will proceed only as far as needed to allow
grading and/or construction of the utility to continue and/or only as far as needed to allow
alternate corrective measures described below. Suspect significantly impacted soil
excavated during grading and/or utility line installation or removal may be stockpiled and
covered in a secure area to allow construction to progress. Suspect impacted soil will be
underlain by and covered with minimum 10-mil plastic sheeting. Specifically, one
representative sample of the soil will be collected for analysis of VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA
metals at a frequency of one sample per approximately 500 to 2,000 cy. If the results of
analysis indicate that the soil could potentially exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous
12
EMP Version 2, January 2021

waste criteria, then the soil will also be analyzed by TCLP for those compounds that could
exceed the toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria. Impacted soil will be handled in
the manner described below based upon the laboratory analyses:
i. If no organic compounds are detected in a sample (other than those attributable to
sampling or laboratory artifacts [subject to DEQ review and approval]) and metals are
below Residential PSRGs or are consistent with Site -specific and/or published background
ranges for North Carolina soils, then the soil will be deemed suitable for use as on -Site fill
or as off -Site fill. The proposed location(s) for off -Site placement of soil (other than a
permitted facility), other applicable off -Site information (i.e., sampling results, if available),
and the receiving facility's written approval for acceptance of the soil will be provided to
DEQ for approval prior to taking the soil off -Site.
If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed the DEQ
Residential PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts for
which DEQ is the arbiter, or which are consistent with Site -specific and/or published
background ranges for metals in North Carolina soils) and the TCLP concentrations are
below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil may be used on -Site as fill without
conditions.
iii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the DEQ Residential
PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts for which DEQ
is the arbiter, or which are consistent with Site -specific and/or published background
ranges for metals in North Carolina soils) and the TCLP concentrations are below hazardous
waste criteria, then the soil, with DEQ's written approval, may be used on -Site as fill in
non-recreational/open space areas and below an impervious surface, or at least 2 ft of
compacted clean soil. If the impacted soil with concentrations above Residential PSRGs is
moved to an on -Site location, its location and depth will be documented, covered with a
geotextile fabric so that its location can be identified if encountered in the future, and its
location will be provided to DEQ and identified on the Brownfields plat (if not already
recorded with the executed Brownfields Agreement).
iv. Impacted soil may be transported to a permitted facility such as a Subtitle D lined
landfill. Transport to another permitted facility such as an LCID or C&D landfill will require
DEQ's prior written approval and comparison to site -specific concentrations from the
receiving facility. If soil is transported to a permitted facility, the permitted facility's
written approval to dispose of soil from the Site will be included with the final EMP report.
In the unlikely event that the sample data indicates concentrations above TCLP hazardous
waste criteria, then the soil must be transported off -Site to a permitted disposal facility
that can accept or treat hazardous waste.
V. If soil export is necessary, the procedure(s) in Part 1.c. Export Soils will be followed.
If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
13
EMP Version 2, January 2021

® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Methods 6020/7471
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
UICK or tap nere to enter text.
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
© Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Soil samples will be collected for hexavalent chromium and put on hold for
potential analysis by EPA Method 7199. The laboratory will be directed to hold all
hexavalent chromium analyses pending the results of the total chromium analyses.
If total chromium is detected in any of the soil samples above the current
hexavalent chromium Residential PSRG, the sample exhibiting the highest total
chromium concentration will be analyzed for hexavalent chromium. If hexavalent
chromium is detected in that sample above the current hexavalent chromium
Residential PSRG, the remaining soil samples may be analyzed for hexavalent
chromium subject to approval by DEQ Brownfields.
® Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted in
accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:
lick or tap here to enter text.
® Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (Check all thatapply):
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Methods 6020/7471
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
14
EMP Version 2, January 2021

❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to ente-+-
® Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Soil samples will be collected for hexavalent chromium and put on hold for
potential analysis by EPA Method 7199. The laboratory will be directed to hold
all hexavalent chromium analyses pending the results of the total chromium
analyses. If total chromium is detected in any of the soil samples above the
current hexavalent chromium Residential PSRG, the sample exhibiting the
highest total chromium concentration will be analyzed for hexavalent chromium.
If hexavalent chromium is detected in that sample above the current hexavalent
chromium Residential PSRG, the remaining soil samples may be analyzed for
hexavalent chromium subject to approval by DEQ Brownfields.
Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, indicate if a work
plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
nick or tap here to enter text.
❑ If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale:
Following completion of soil disturbance for any discrete future Site development (i.e., after
grading and utility construction), an environmental professional will be contracted to assess
residential development areas of high foot traffic for surfaces that are not covered with a
minimum of 2 ft of clean fill soil or topsoil, building foundations, sidewalks, asphalt or
concrete parking areas, driveways or other impervious surfaces. Specific attention will be
paid to identify recreational and open space areas that will be frequented by the users of
the Brownfields property. If such areas exist, a Work Plan will be prepared for final grade
sampling for DEQ review and approval. If no such areas exist, documentation will be
provided to DEQ.
Part 1.13. IMPORTED FILL SOIL
NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM
THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, "Documenting imported soil
(by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written approval in advance by
the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided by the brownfields
agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property owner."
Requirements for importing fill:
EMP Version 2, January 2021

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ................................................ © Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
Approximately 12,500 cy of soil will be imported to the Site to reach final proposed grades.
3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range
of depths, please list the range.)
Fill soils are planned to be placed at the Site at depths up to approximately 11 feet. A cut/fill
analysis is included in Appendix B.
4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
The borrow source for fill material is unknown at this time. Upon determination of the borrow
source, DEQ will be notified for pre -approval and the procedures outlined below will be
implemented.
5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use atthe Brownfields property.
The PD plans to import limited amounts of organic rich topsoil from a commercial landscape
material vendor for use in proposed landscaped areas. The PD does not plan to collect samples of
landscaping materials prior to placement at the Site; however, DEQ Brownfields will be notified of
the volume of landscaping material needed and the proposed source of the material prior to
placement in proposed landscaping areas. See No. 7 below for details outlining the proposed plan
to demonstrate import soil meets acceptable standards to the Site.
6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
© Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Methods 6020/7471
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter texl
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tdF, „—
1i
EMP Version 2, January 2021

® Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.):
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199
7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan submitted
separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in -situ borrow
sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought onto the
Brownfields Property.
The PD will follow the procedures outlined below to demonstrate import soil meets acceptable
criteria for Site use.
If the PD plans to import virgin fill material from a DEQ Brownfields pre -approved borrow source
(such as the Wake Stone Corporation quarry located in Knightdale, North Carolina), no samples of
the import material will be collected because adequate analytical data is available in the DEQ
Brownfields database to demonstrate material from these facilities is suitable for use as structural
fill at a Brownfields property.
If fill soil (other than topsoil) is obtained from an off -Site property that is not a known permitted
quarry or is recycled material from a DEQ Brownfields pre -approved borrow source, the borrow
source will be sampled in general accordance with the most recent versions of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region IV Science and Ecosystem Support Division (SESD)
Field Branches Quality System and Technical Procedures guidance. If the proposed borrow
material is a byproduct of crushing stone (referred to as "fines") from a permitted quarry, no
samples will be collected for laboratory analysis. If the proposed borrow source is soil from a
permitted quarry, one soil sample will be collected for laboratory analysis. If the proposed borrow
source has not been previously developed (i.e., virgin land), soil samples will be collected for
laboratory analysis at a general rate of approximately one per 1,000 cubic yards. If the borrow
source property has been previously developed, soil samples will be collected for laboratory
analysis at a general rate of approximately one per 500 cubic yards.
Specifically, soil samples for the above scenarios will be collected using a hand auger. For metals
and SVOC analyses, a composite sample will be comprised of soil from four grab sample locations
(i.e., aliquots). The composite soil samples will be collected directly into dedicated laboratory -
supplied sample containers and submitted to a North Carolina certified laboratory under standard
chain of custody protocols for analysis of SVOCs by EPA Method 8270 and RCRA metals plus
hexavalent chromium by EPA Methods 6020/7471/7199. For VOC analysis, one representative
grab soil sample will also be collected. The grab soil samples will be collected from undisturbed
portions of soil directly into laboratory -supplied glassware for laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA
Method 8260.
The DEQ Brownfields project manager will be contacted should an alternate sampling frequency be
sought for either type of borrow source property.
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Fill soil will be considered suitable for use at the Site if it does not contain compound
concentrations above DEQ Residential PSRGs, DEQ Risk Calculator risk thresholds, or typical metals
concentrations which are consistent with published background ranges for metals in regional soils.
DEQ approval of the analytical results will be obtained prior to transporting import soil to the Site.
Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL
NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.
1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will be
excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of export
and sampling results included.
Export soil is not anticipated at this time. However, should soil need to be exported from the
Brownfields property during redevelopment, soil will be sampled in general accordance with the
most recent versions of the EPA Region IV SESD Field Branches Quality System and Technical
Procedures guidance.
Samples will be collected from export soil at a rate of one sample for every approximately 1,000
cubic yards of export for laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method
8270, and RCRA metals by EPA Methods 6020/7471. SVOCs and metals will be collected as
composite samples using a decontaminated stainless -steel hand auger. Soil samples will also be
collected for hexavalent chromium and put-on hold for potential analysis by EPA Method 7199.
The laboratory will be directed to hold hexavalent chromium analyses pending the results of the
total chromium analyses. If total chromium is detected in the soil samples above the current
hexavalent chromium Residential PSRG, the sample exhibiting the highest total chromium
concentration will be analyzed for hexavalent chromium. If hexavalent chromium is detected in
that sample above the current hexavalent chromium Residential PSRG, the remaining soil samples
may be analyzed for hexavalent chromium subject to approval by DEQ Brownfields.
For each soil sample, three individual sample aliquots will be collected and be combined to form
one sample for laboratory analysis of metals and SVOCs. The aliquots will also be field screened
for the presence of VOCs using a calibrated photoionization detector (PID). In the general area of
the aliquot which exhibits the highest indication of impact during field screening, a grab sample
will be collected using a decontaminated stainless -steel hand auger for analysis of VOCs. The soil
samples will be placed in dedicated laboratory -supplied sample containers, covered with ice, and
18
EMP Version 2, January 2021

shipped to a North Carolina -certified laboratory under standard chain of custody protocols.
DEQ approval of the analytical results will be obtained prior to transporting export soil from the
Site. Based on analytical results of soil samples collected from the export soil, and if applicable,
other applicable off -Site information (i.e., sampling results, if available), the soil will be
transported off -Site to a suitable permanent location. The PD will notify DEQ Brownfields of the
location receiving the export soil. If not a permitted facility, DEQ Brownfields approval and
written approval from the receiving facility will be obtained prior to transporting the soil off -Site.
2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
© Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
® Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be determined
by the accepting Landfill;
® Landfarm or other treatment facility
© Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property — determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase the
potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and thata record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of the
receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
® Use as Beneficial Fill off -site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is provided
in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.
3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).
The environmental professional will contact DEQ Brownfields to obtain DEQ Brownfields and
DEQ Solid Waste approval prior to exporting soil to a non-Brownfields property or lined Subtitle
D MSW landfill.
Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
❑ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)
® Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths theywere
removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth
from which it was excavated.
EMP Version 2, January 2021

❑ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
❑ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials or provide the results of this evaluation in the
Vapor Mitigation Plan. Note that if vapor mitigation is planned for site buildings, utility corridors
will need to be evaluated as part of mitigation designs:
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ If no, include rationale here:
® Unknown, details to be provided in the Vapor Mitigation Plan for site buildings
Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Although not anticipated, in the event contaminated soil and/or vapors (based on unusual odors) are
encountered in utility trenches during redevelopment activities, the trench will be evacuated and
appropriate safety screening (i.e., with a calibrated photoionization detector [PID] and/or similar
instrument depending on the conditions) of the vapors will be performed to protect workers. If results
indicate further action is warranted in response to vapors to protect workers, appropriate engineering
controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.
The contractor and workers will observe soil for potential impacts during utility installation activities.
Evidence of potential impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or
previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e., chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be
noted during utility work, the contractor will contact the project environmental professional to observe
the suspect condition. If the project environmental professional confirms that the material may be
impacted, then the procedures outlined Managing On -Site Soil above will be implemented. In addition,
the environmental professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within two business
days to advise that person of the condition.
PART 2. GROUNDWATER
1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
Based upon groundwater assessment activities conducted at the Site, groundwater is generally
present at depths of approximately 7 to 20 ft bgs.
2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ®onsite ❑offsite ❑both or ❑unknown sources?
Describe source(s):
Groundwater assessment activities conducted at the Brownfields property have identified the
presence of benzene, bromodichloromethane, ethylbenzene, naphthalene, tetra chloroethylene
(PCE), toluene, total xylenes, 1-methylnapthalene, 2-methylnaphthalene, bis(2-
20
EMP Version 2, January 2021

ethyl hexyl)phthaIate, and total chromium at concentrations above the DEQ 2L Groundwater
Quality Standards (2L Standards).
3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
Groundwater flow direction at the Brownfields property is generally expected to flow towards
Rocky Branch Creek, which is located in the north and eastern portions of the Site.
4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, describe these activities:
Groundwater is not expected to be encountered during redevelopment activities. However, if
groundwater is encountered, the PD or the PD's contractor will contact the project environmental
professional. The environmental professional will update the DEQ Brownfields project manager
within two business days.
Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during
redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent
management of groundwater (e.g., dewateringof groundwater from excavations or
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or
sampling procedures).
Although not anticipated, if groundwater is encountered during installation of foundation
infrastructure, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken if groundwater gathers in
an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted (based on strong odor, unnatural
color, sheen, etc.) during construction activities. The contractor will contact the environmental
professional to observe the suspected condition. The accumulated water will be allowed to
evaporate/infiltrate to the extent time for dissipation does not disrupt the construction
schedule. Should the time needed for natural dissipation of accumulated water be deemed
inadequate, the water will be tested for the presence of VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals and
disposed off -Site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted
above Title 15A NCAC 2B Surface Water Standards [213 Standards] and not considered listed
hazardous waste) in accordance with applicable municipal and State regulations for erosion
control and construction stormwater control. Documentation of approvals, if applicable, will be
provided to DEQ Brownfields.
The volume of groundwater that will require management during foundation installations is
unknown, as it is largely dependent on Site -specific geological and hydrogeological conditions.
The minority of drilling spoils is anticipated to be saturated soil, which will be managed as noted
in Part 1.A. and Part 1.C. If free -flowing groundwater can be reasonably captured, it will be
pumped to lined and covered roll -off containers or an aboveground tank prior to testing for the
presence of VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals. The groundwater will then be disposed off -Site (if
impacted) or discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above 2B Standards and not
considered listed and/or characteristic hazardous waste). Alternatively, additional groundwater
21
EMP Version 2, January 2021

sampling may be conducted under a DEQ-approved work plan in the areas of foundation
installations to evaluate contaminant concentrations for potential discharge to storm sewer.
Local officials will be contacted for approval prior to discharge of groundwater to the storm
sewer. Documentation of approvals, if applicable, will be provided to DEQ Brownfields.
5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................❑XYes ❑No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................❑Yes ®No
6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
© Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program's intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as specified
in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring through another
section of DEQ or the EPA.
❑ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
❑ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
❑ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.
7) Please provide additional details as needed:
Monitoring wells MW-3 and MW-7 (Figure 3) were installed during historical UST assessment activities
in the northern portion of the Brownfields property and will be abandoned as part of redevelopment
activities.
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.
PART 3. SURFACE WATER
1) Is surface water present at the property? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ® Yes ❑ No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ® No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities,
or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of such events
(e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
EMP Version 2, January 2021

If surface water run-off gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted
during construction activities, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken. The
accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent time for dissipation does
not disrupt the construction schedule. Should the time be needed for natural dissipation of
accumulated water be deemed inadequate, the water will be tested and disposed off -Site (if
impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above 2B Standards and
not considered listed hazardous waste) in accordance with applicable municipal and State
regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control. Documentation of
approvals, if applicable, will be provided to DEQ Brownfields.
PART 4. SEDIMENT
1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ® Yes ❑ No
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ® No
4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.
5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
Not applicable.
PARTS. SOIL VAPOR
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ❑ No © Unknown
Groundwater:.....® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
Groundwater:.....® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Click or tap here to enter text.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during
planned redevelopment activities?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑X Unknown In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during
redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list
activities for management of such contact:
In the unlikely event impacted soil vapors are encountered during future redevelopment
activities, worker breathing zone will be monitored using a calibrated PID detector. If results
indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial
fans) will be implemented.
PART 6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in sub -slab soil vapor:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:...........© Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Groundwater:.....® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:...........® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
2) Groundwater: ..... ❑x Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown If data indicate that sub -slab soil vapor
concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub -slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? 90-6 inches ❑Other, please
describe:
LaN I � enter teAL.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub -slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑X Unknown
❑ If no, include rationale here:
Click or tap here to enter text.
In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
In the unlikely event impacted soil vapors are encountered during future redevelopment
activities, worker breathing zone will be monitored using a calibrated PID. If results indicate
further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will
be implemented. Based upon the proposed redevelopment plans and Site assessment results,
2 i'
EMP Version 2, January 2021

exposure of workers to significant soil vapor impacts is not anticipated.
PART 7. INDOOR AIR
1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk -based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
❑ If no, include rationale here:
CH,— —,here too f r+ov+
In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:
In the unlikely event there is evidence of potential indoor air issues (i.e., unusual odors) during future
redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the indoor air
will be performed. If warranted, safety screening procedures will include periodically screening indoor
air for volatile organic vapors with a calibrated PID and calibrated methane gas detector. If results
indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans)
will be implemented.
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
© Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
❑ If no or unknown, include rationale here as well as plans for pre -occupancy sampling, as
necessary:
'lick or tap here `,) ent— tex
If yes, ❑ VIMS Plan Attached or © VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
The PD understands that the Brownfields Program is requesting pre -occupancy vapor intrusion
assessment following construction of the Site buildings. As such, the PD is electing to proactively
install vapor intrusion mitigation systems (VIMSs) in the proposed Site buildings. VIMS details will
EMP Version 2, January 2021

be provided to DEQ Brownfields under separate cover.
VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer
If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
Note that approval of this EMP does not imply approval with any vapor intrusion mitigation land
use restrictions or requirements of the recorded or draft Brownfields Agreement and that
separate approval of mitigation measures will be required.
CONTINGENCY PLAN — encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials
In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown potential
new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon that
unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, orother waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.
Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site impacts,
the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be prepared based
on the EMP requirements and site -specific factors. Samples will generally be collected to
document the location of the potential impacts.
Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
EPA Method 6020 and EPA Method 7471
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text
© Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Soil samples will be collected for hexavalent chromium and put on hold for potential
analysis by EPA Method 7199. The laboratory will be directed to hold all hexavalent
EMP Version 2, January 2021

chromium analyses pending the results of the total chromium analyses. If total
chromium is detected in any of the soil samples above the current hexavalent
chromium Residential PSRG, the sample exhibiting the highest total chromium
concentration will be analyzed for hexavalent chromium. If hexavalent chromium is
detected in that sample above the current hexavalent chromium Residential PSRG, the
remaining soil samples may be analyzed for hexavalent chromium subject to approval
by DEQ Brownfields.
Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly encountered
issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
During construction activities, contractors may encounter unknown subsurface environmental
conditions (i.e., tanks, drums, or waste materials) that if encountered, will require proper
management. Prior to beginning Site work, H&H will attend a pre -construction meeting with the PD
and the redevelopment contractors to discuss the DEQ approved EMP and various scenarios when it
would be appropriate and necessary to notify H&H of the discovery of unknown subsurface features
or potentially impacted media at the Site.
In the event that such conditions are encountered during Site development activities, the
environmental actions noted below will be used to direct environmental actions to be taken during
these activities, and sampling data for potentially impacted soil and the disposition of impacted soil
will be provided to DEQwhen the data becomes available. In addition, the environmental
professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within two business days to advise
that person of the condition
Underground Storage Tanks:
In the event a UST or impacts associated with a UST release are discovered at the Site during
redevelopment activities, the UST and/or UST related impacts will be addressed through the
Brownfields Program in accordance with the DEQ UST Section Guidance: Guidelines for Site Checks,
Tank Closure and Initial Response and Abatement, May 17, 2021 version (UST Guidance) except that
the collection of MADEP samples will not be necessary.
If a UST is encountered, DEQ will be notified and the UST will be removed and transported off -Site
for disposal at a suitable facility. If the UST contains residual fluids, the fluids will be sampled for
VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals, and transported off -Site for disposal at a suitable facility based on
the laboratory analytical results prior to removing the UST from the ground. If a UST is encountered
that cannot be removed or does not require removal for geotechnical or construction purposes, with
DEQ prior approval it will be abandoned in -place and construction will proceed. Impacted soil in the
vicinity of the UST will be managed in accordance with the Managing On -Site Soil section outlined
above in the EMP. Impacted soil will be removed and confirmation samples will be collected from
the base and sidewalls of the UST excavation, and along any product lines at a rate of 1 sample for
every 10 feet of line. The analytical program will consist of EPA Methods 8260, 8270, and RCRA
metals.
27
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Sub -Grade Feature/Pit:
If a sub -grade feature or pit is encountered and does not require removal for geotechnical or
construction purposes, DEQ Brownfields will be notified and the feature or pit will be filled with soil
or suitable fill and construction will proceed. Where appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated
before back filling to prevent fluid accumulation. If the pit has waste in it, the waste may be set
aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste disposal purposes for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs,
and TCLP metals and disposed off -Site at a permitted facility or the waste will be managed in
accordance with the Managing On -Site Soil section outlined above in the EMP, whichever is most
applicable based on the type of waste present. If the pit must be removed and the observed waste
characteristics indicate the concrete may potentially be contaminated, the concrete will be sampled
and analyzed by methods specified by the disposal facility. Confirmation samples will be collected
from the base and sidewalls of the excavation. The analytical program will consist of EPA Methods
8260, 8270, and RCRA metals.
Buried Waste Material — Note that if buried waste, non-native fill, or any obviously filled materials is
encountered, the DEQ Brownfields Program must be notified to determine if investigation of landfill
gases is required:
If excavation into buried wastes or impacted soils occurs, the contractor is instructed to stop work in
that location and notify the environmental consultant, who will then notify the DEQ Brownfields
Program. The environmental consultant will review the materials and collect confirmation samples
at representative locations in the base and the sidewalls of the excavation after the waste or
impacted soil is removed. The confirmation samples will be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA
metals. Areas of suspected contaminated soil that remain at the Site after excavation is complete
above the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs will be managed pursuant to this plan.
Re -Use of Impacted Soils On -Site:
Please refer to description outlined in the Managing On -Site Soil section of the EMP above.
If unknown, impacted soil is identified on -site, management on -site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part I.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on -site.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
Click or tap here to enter text.
28
EMP Version 2, January 2021

POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
® Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be due
by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of this
EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final Redevelopment
Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of redevelopment. Based on the
estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary Report is anticipated to be
submitted on 1/31/2022
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment -related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed to
be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).
X❑ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site's Brownfields Agreement.
29
EMP Version 2, January 2021

APPROVAL SIGNATURES
Brownfields Project Number: 21050-17-092
Brownfields Project Name: South Saunders Street Assemblage
Prospective Developer: Kane Realty Corporation
Date ck or tap to enter a dat,
Printed Name/Title/Company: Mr. Drew Yates / Senior Development Manager / Kane Realty Corporation
Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC
Date Click or tap to enter a date.
Printed Name/Title/Company: Mr. Justin Ballard, P.G. / Project Manager / Hart & Hickman, PC
/l QAq' L�? �fv�l?i December 8, 2021
BrownfieloPr(64ct Ma#ger: Mr. Kelly Johnson
Date Click or tap to enter a dat(
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Figure 1
NCBP Diagram for Temporary
Containment of Impacted or Potentially
Impacted Soil
Cross -Section View
Top Plastic Cover Sheeting: Underliner: 1 layer, minimum of 10
(1 Layer, minimum: 10 mil thick) mil thick plastic
Berm
(Straw bales,
composted earth, etc.)
Land
Surface
\ z
Straw Bale Berm
0
Weight
(If plastic
cover used)
Contaminated Soils
I' \
Map View
■ E:1 [0c ght
.1, ..................... .......... . . 5�ZNj
Contaminated Soils
.. .......................................................
000 o Plastic
\ Sheeting
Note: Adapted from NC DEQ UST Section "Guidelines for Ex Situ Petroleum Contaminated Soil Remediation" dated December, 1, 2013
32
EMP Version 2, January 2021

APPROXIMATE
w 0 2000 4000
SCALE IN FEET
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
RALEIGH WEST, NORTH CAROLINA, 2002
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)

I (IIWVVRY'f it6=1)
9"ol :✓AFeALclJILTA! I SIC
SSVP.
TMW-9
C\
/
SC
'
SB
---^
- / TMW-8
ELEVATION
soo-YEArs \
\FLOG ATON
10+00
I
07a
:0
S
5s
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PARCEL LINES
CAPITAL AREA GREENWAY - ROCKY BRANCH
TRAIL
6Afil - - - ROCKY BRANCH CREEK
INV-243.7r ANV�2
/ / �INV=243.7s PERMANENT GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
'! - (INSTALLED BY OTHERS)
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL LOCATION (H&H)
SOIL BORING LOCATION H&H
( )
00
A SURFACE WATER / SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATION
(H&H)
l- - - - SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR SAMPLE LOCATION (H&H)
TMW-3 TMW-2 `MW-3.► MW-7 T , -
� FVE-zs7.o / INv= Iis>j ; PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR RETAIL, AMENITY
SB-6 W-1/S
® SSVP_8 / �L SPACE, OR OFFICE SPACE
,_7 3.0
PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR RESIDENTIAL
FFE-259.0 SB-1• _.�� ,� SPACE
SB-8 PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE
noe
/ E�pppp--yY�E�gg -J
o-YYEAR
NA
Ji,/,///ii%� 10,
-SW-3/SED-3
yi ,,/� y, // / � � PROPOSED MULTI -USE PATH
SSVP-7
-TMW-1,'%,�/-�,L/:'%
)SIDN
I + ROW OF I
woad Pos
FLOOD ELEVATION \
ELEVATION FLOOD
too-1EAe �, v A �/
sp
/I i'EL/ATION/
500-1�E'nN
s=-�-�--
�--/ +
-2/SED-2� j _
NOTES:
1. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM ESRI GIS SERVICES
(2019).
2. BASE DATA OBTAINED FROM WAKE COUNTY GIS (2020).
1O0-YEAH FLOOD
ELEVATION
APPROXIMATE
0 70 140
-a0 ELEVA ON
a
/ m I
Elevations Table
Number
Minimum Elevation
Maximum Elevation
Area
Color
1
-6.36
-1.53
24585.59
2
-1.53
-0.25
17802.32
3
-0.25
0.04
10714.13
4
0.04
0.32
13966.08
5
0.32
0.74
13599.80
6
0.74
1.74
24970.74
-
]
1.74
3.85
32409,96
8
L
3.85
11.18
1 34961.73
_
SCALE IN FEET
I TITLE
CUT -FILL SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
IrOJECT SOUTH SAUNDERS STREET ASSEMBLAGE
RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
BROWNFIELDS PROJECT NO. 21050-17-092
H&H JOB NO. MRG-003
■
/
t9
hart � h i c k m a n
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
`
919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(1}
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
l )
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 15 30 60
DATE: 8-24-21
REVISION NO.0
/
JOB NO. ACO-001
FIGURE NO. 4

Table 1
Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Data
South Saunders Street Assemblage
Raleigh, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 21050-17-092
H&H Job No. MRG-003
SSVP-4
SSVP-8
Sample ID
SSVP-1
SSVP-2
SSVP-3
SSVP-5
SSVP-6
SSVP-7
SSVP-4 DUP-1
SSVP-8 DUP-2
Residential
Non -Residential
Sample Date
12/12/2018
12/12/2018
12/12/2018
12/12/2018
12/12/2018
12/12/2018
12/12/2019
Sub -Slab SGSL(')
Sub -Slab SGSL(''
Address
1001 South Saunders Street
1015A South Saunders Street
1015B South Saunders Street
927 South Saunders Street
Units
Ng/m3
VOCs (TO-15)
Acetone
37
48
180 J
390
490
160
3,000
290
510
480
220,000
2,700,000
Benzene
<0.64
<0.64
44
230
190
1.7
3.1
5.6 J
0.46 J
0.50 J
120
1,600
2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone; MEK)
4.0 J
<24
<240
<240
<240
7.5
81
26 J
11 J
9.6 J
35,000
440,000
Carbon Tetrachloride
<1.3
48
<13
<13
<13
17
<1.3
<13
<1.3
<1.3
160
2,000
Chloroform
4.2
2.7
<9.8
130
<9.8
<0.98
<0.98
<9.8
<0.98
<0.98
41
530
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
<1.2
<1.2
<12
<12
<12
<1.2
1.3
<12
<1.2
<1.2
NE
NE
1,1-Dichloroethane
<0.81
13
4,300
360
320
<0.81
<0.81
<8.1
<0.81
<0.81
580
7,700
1,1-Dichloroethene
<0.79
150
27,000
2,900
2,600
21
<0.79
<7.9
<0.79
<0.79
1,400
18,000
Ethanol
87
74
230
210
310
2,100
2,600
1,100
170
170
NE
NE
Ethyl Acetate
<1.4
11
<7.2
<7.2
<7.2
<1.4
<1.4
<14
<1.4
<1.4
490
6,100
Ethylbenzene
<0.87
<0.87
<8.7
1,300
1,100
8.5
10
13
1.5
1.5
370
4,900
4-Ethyltoluene
<0.98
<0.98
<9.8
2,800
2,400
17
16
24
1.6
1.6
NE
NE
Heptane
<0.82
<0.82
<8.2
140
110
<0.82
10
9.8
0.72 J
<0.82
2,800
35,000
Hexane
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
410
<28
<28
4,900
61,000
2-Hexanone
<0.82
<0.82
<8.2
<8.2
<8.2
<0.82
14
<8.2
<0.82
<0.82
210
2,600
Isopropanol
9.0 J
13 J
<200
<200
<200
35
200
350
59
57
1,400
18,000
Methylene Chloride
1.3 J
2.5 J
<69
<69
<69
<6.9
<6.9
<69
<6.9
<6.9
4,200
53,000
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
<0.82
<0.82
<10
<8.2
<8.2
<8.2
19
<8.2
<0.82
<0.82
21,000
260,000
Naphthalene
<1.0
<1.0
<140
<10
<10
<1.0
2.7
<10
<1.0
<1.0
21
260
Styrene
<0.85
<0.85
<8.5
<8.5
<8.5
1.6
<0.85
<8.5
<0.85
<0.85
7,000
88,000
Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
570
31
<14
78
87
160
340
7,000
25
24
280
3,500
Toluene
2.6
14
11
3,500
3,000
30
61
170
4.0
3.9
35,000
440,000
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
<1.1
300
50,000
10,000
8,700
110
140
<11
<1.1
<1.1
35,000
440,000
Trichloroethene (TCE)
550
11
<11
<11
32
5.1
<1.1
<11
<1.1
<1.1
14
180
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1.6 J
2.5 J
<45
<45
<45
1.1 J
1.3 J
<45
1.1 J
1.1 J
NE
NE
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
<0.98
2.8
<9.8
2,800
2,400
17
21
28
1.6
1.6
420
5,300
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
<0.98
1.3
<9.8
1,700
1,400
9.2
5.9
9.8
1.3
1.2
420
5,300
m&p-Xylene
<1.7
6.4
<17
8,000
6,800
48
46
46
12
13
700
8,800
o-Xylene
<0.87
6.2
<8.7
4,800
4,100
28
19
23
6.4
6.4
700
8,800
Risk Evaluation (Soil Gas to Indoor Air)(z)
3.7E-05
4.7E-06
7.7E-05
9.2E-05
5.3E-05
2.2E-06
2.5E-06
2.0E-05
1.5E-07
1.5E-07
Residential Carcinogenic Risk
Residential Hazard Index
8.3E+00
2.3E-01
4.2E+00
6.7E+00
6.1E+00
2.4E-01
3.5E-01
5.1E+00
3.4E-02
3.3E-02
Non -Residential Carcinogenic Risk
2.0E-06
3.5E-07
5.9E-06
7.0E-06
4.0E-06
1.6E-07
1.9E-07
1.5E-06
1.1E-08
1.1E-08
Non -Residential Hazard Index
6.6E-01
1.8E-02
3.3E-01
5.3E-01
4.9E-01
1.9E-02
2.8E-02
4.0E-01
2.7E-03
2.7E-03
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Sub -slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) (February 2018).
2) Risk evaluation performed using the December 2019 DEQ Risk Calculator for the soil gas to indoor air vapor intrusion pathway.
Only volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detected in at least one sample are shown.
Compound concentrations reported to the laboratory method detection limits.
Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (pg/m').
Laboratory analytical method is shown in parentheses.
Bold values indicate compounds detected above DEQ Residential SGSLs (February 2018).
Underlined values indicate compounds detected above DEQ Non -Residential SGSLs (February 2018).
Highlighted risk values exceed DEQ's acceptable risk limits of 1.0E-04 for carcinogenic risk or 1.0E+00 for hazard index.
J = Estimated value that is less than the laboratory reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit.
ft bgs = feet below the ground surface; NE = Not Established; -- = Not Applicable.
Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)
S ~-Master Prcj.WWerge Capital (MRG)\MRG-W3 S. Saunders Street AssemblageS-fields Assessment\Tables\S. Saunders DaW Tables_20200303 Hatt &Hickman, PC
3/5/2020

Table 2
Summary of Soil Analytical Data
South Saunders Street Assemblage
Raleigh, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 21050-17-092
H&H Job No. MRG-003
Site -Specific Background Levels
SB-2
Sample ID
Industrial/
Regional Background
SB-1
SB-3
SB-4
SB-5
SB-6
SB-7
SB-8
SB-9
SB-21
SB-22
SB-2 I DUP-SOIL
Residential
PSRGs('(
Commercial
PSRGs(')
Metals in Soil(2)
Depth (ft bgs)
5-6
1-2
1-2
1-2
2-3
2-3
1-2
7-8
5-6
1-2
1-2
Sample Date
12/12/2019
12/12/2019
Range Mean Ref.
12/12/2019
12/12/2019 12/12/2019
12/12/2019
12/12/2019
12/12/2019
12/11/2019
12/11/2019
12/12/2019
12/10/2019
Units
mg/kg
VOCs (8260B1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,700
7,600
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.00083
<0.00091
<0.00089
<0.00088
<0.00077
<0.00077
<0.00095
<0.0011
<0.00082
<0.00098
1,1-Dichloroethane
3.8
17
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.00070
<0.00077
<0.00075
<0.00074
<0.00065
<0.00065
<0.00080
<0.00097
<0.00069
<0.00083
1,1-Dichloroethene
48
210
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.0011
<0.0012
<0.0012
<0.0012
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0013
<0.0015
<0.0011
<0.0013
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
63
370
NA
NA
-
--
-
<0.0019
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0017
<0.0017
<0.0021
0.017
<0.0018
<0.0022
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
56
320
NA
NA
-
--
-
<0.0016
<0.0018
<0.0017
<0.0017
<0.0015
<0.0015
<0.0018
0.0090
<0.0016
<0.0019
Acetone
12,000
140,000
NA
NA
-
--
--
<0.0090
<0.0099
<0.0096
0.041J
0.012J
<0.0083
<0.010
0.15
0.017J
0.045J
Benzene
1.2
5.4
NA
NA
-
--
-
<0.00086
<0.00094
<0.00091
<0.00091
<0.00080
<0.00079
<0.00098
<0.0012
<0.00085
0.0013J
Bromomethane
1.4
6.4
NA
NA
-
--
-
<0.0022
<0.0025
<0.0024
<0.0024
<0.0021
<0.0021
<0.0026
<0.0031
<0.0022
<0.0027
Chloromethane
23
99
NA
NA
-
--
--
<0.0031
<0.0034
<0.0033
<0.0033
<0.0029
<0.0029
<0.0036
<0.0043
<0.0031
<0.0037
Ethylbenzene
6.1
27
NA
NA
-
--
-
<0.0010
<0.0011
<0.0011
<0.0011
<0.00094
<0.00094
<0.0012
<0.0014
<0.0010
<0.0012
Methylene Chloride
58
650
NA
NA
-
--
--
<0.0056
<0.0062
<0.0060
<0.0060
<0.0052
<0.0052
<0.0065
<0.0078
<0.0056
<0.0067
Tetrachloroethene
17
82
NA
NA
-
--
--
<0.0015
<0.0017
<0.0016
<0.0016
0.0020J
<0.0014
<0.0017
<0.0021
<0.0015
<0.0018
Toluene
990
9,700
NA
NA
-
--
--
<0.0015
<0.0017
<0.0017
<0.0016
<0.0014
<0.0014
<0.0018
0.0025J
<0.0015
0.0022J
Xylene (Total)
120
530
NA
NA
-
--
--
<0.0033
1 <0.0037
<0.0036
<0.0035
<0.0031
<0.0031
<0.0038
<0.0046
<0.0033
<0.0040
SVOCs(8270D)
1-Methylnaphthalene
18
73
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.097
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.50
<0.49
<0.094
'0.61
<0.51
<0.49
2-Methylnaphthalene
48
600
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.093
<0.097
<0.099
<0.10
<0.48
<0.47
<0.090
1.1J
<0.49
<0.47
Acenaphthene
720
9000
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.094
<0.098
<0.10
<0.10
<0.49
<0.47
<0.091
0.951
<0.50
1.4.1
Anthracene
3,600
45000
NA
NA
-
--
--
<0.095
<0.099
<0.10
<0.10
<0.49
<0.48
<0.091
2.9J
<0.50
2.1
Benz(a)anthracene
1.1
21
NA
NA
-
--
--
<0.12
<0.12
<0.12
<0.12
<0.60
<0.59
<0.11
13.6
<0.61
5.4
Benzo(a)pyrene
0.11
2.1
NA
NA
-
--
--
<0.16
<0.17
<0.17
<0.17
<0.82
<0.80
<0.15
13.3
<0.83
4_6
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
1.1
21
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.15
<0.15
<0.16
<0.16
<0.76
<0.74
<0.14
16.9
<0.78
6.3
Benzo(g,hJ)perylene
NE
NE
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.14
<0.15
<0.15
<0.15
<0.74
<0.72
<0.14
11.1
<0.75
2.8
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
11
210
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.15
<0.16
<0.16
<0.16
<0.80
<0.78
<0.15
6.4
<0.81
2.5
Butylbenzylphthalate
290
1,200
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.097
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.50
<0.49
<0.094
<0.81
<0.51
2.0
Chrysene
110
2,100
NA
NA
-
--
--
<0.11
<0.11
<0.11
<0.11
<0.55
<0.54
<0.10
12.0
<0.56
4.4
Dibenzofuran
15
210
NA
NA
-
--
--
<0.091
<0.095
<0.097
<0.098
<0.47
<0.46
<0.088
<0.76
<0.48
0.46J
Fluoranthene
480
6,000
NA
NA
-
--
--
<0.11
<0.12
<0.12
<0.12
<0.57
0.85J
<0.11
16.3
<0.58
11.5
Fluorene
480
6,000
NA
NA
-
--
--
<0.098
<0.10
<0.10
<0.10
<0.51
<0.49
<0.094
<0.81
<0.52
0.74J
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1.1
21
NA
NA
-
--
--
<0.17
<0.17
<0.18
<0.18
<0.87
<0.84
<0.16
9.2
<0.88
2.5
Phenanthrene
NE
NE
NA
NA
-
--
--
<0.092
<0.096
<0.097
<0.098
<0.48
<0.46
<0.089
8.8
<0.49
9.3
Pyrene
360
4,500
NA
NA
-
--
--
<0.10
I <0.10
<0.11
<0.11
1 <0.52
1.01
1 <0.097
20.7
1 <0.53
9.4
RCRA Metals (602017471171991
Arsenic
0.68
3
0.842
2.44
1.0-18
4.8
A
0.630
0.612
0.667
1.32
3.22
2.31
0.1911
4.53
3.34
2.94
Barium
3,100
47,000
121
87.8
50-1,000
356
A
77.5
131
147
146
68.4
58.5
28.9
189
83.3
142
Cadmium
7.5
110
<0.0861
<0.0985
1.0-10
4.3
B
0.122J
<0.0873
<0.104
<0.0932
1.00
0.221J
<0.0860
3.34
0.459J
3.93
Chromium (total)
NE
NE
24.4
51.3
7.0-300
65
A
22.7
19.6
19.3
26.6
19.0
13.4
0.879J
31.6
17.1
27.2
Hexavalent Chromium
0.31
6.5
<0.274
0.644J
NE
NE
--
<0.294
<0.278
<0.332
<0.297
0.3101
<0.278
<0.274
1.23
<0.304
4.85
Trivalent Chromium
23,000
100,000
24.4
50.7
NE
NE
--
22.7
19.6
19.3
26.6
18.7
13.4
0.879J
30.4
17.1
22.4
Lead
400
800
7.70
14.4
BRL-50
16
A
4.98
15.7
15.3
11.2
11,870
48.9
3.58
723
126
159
Selenium
78.0
1,200
0.377J
0.811
<0.1-0.8
0.121
A
0.578
0.333.1
0.555.1
0.567J
0.440J
0.524J
0.440J
0.897
0.512J
0.789
Silver
78.0
1,200
<0.167
<0.191
BRL-5.0
0.42
C
<0.179
<0.169
<0.202
<0.181
0.1801
<0.169
<0.167
<0.187
<0.185
<0.176
Mercury
1 2.3
1 9.7
1 0.0149J
0.0850
0.03-0.52
NS
I A
0.0212J
0.00939J
0.0167J
I 0.0294J
1 0.195
1 0.0318J
1<0.00301
1 0.146
1 0.0817
1 0.0645
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (December 2019).
2) Range and mean of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekid, 2005.
Ref. A. North Carolina soils, B. Southeastern US soils, C. Soils of the conterminous USA
With the exception of metals, only analytes with concentrations above the laboratory reporting limit are shown.
Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
Only VOCs and SVOCs detected in at least one sample are shown.
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
Bold values indicate compounds detected above Residential PSRGs and Site -specific background levels for metals.
Underlined values indicate compounds detected above Industrial/Commercial PSRGs and Site -specific background levels for metals.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi -volatile organic compounds; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act;
ft bgs = feet below the ground surface; NA = Not Analyzed; NE = Not Established; -- = Not Applicable.
J = Estimated value that is less than the laboratory reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit.
Table 2 (Page 1 of 2)
L612020 a-PrgeckV.�e Gapibl(MRG)VA 03 S-d--Assemblage\&own 1d, Asse55mmPTab1,e Saw GMa Tades_20200305 Hart &Hickman, P(^

Table 2
Summary of Soil Analytical Data
South Saunders Street Assemblage
Raleigh, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 21050-17-092
H&H Job No. MRG-003
Site -Specific Background Levels
Sample ID
Industrial/
Regional Background
SB-10
SB-11
SB-12
SB-13
SB-14
SB-15
SB-16
SB-17
SB-18
SB-19
SB-20
SB-21
SB-22
Residential
PSRGs''
Commercial
PSRGs"
Metals in Soili2'
Depth (ft bgs)
5-6
1-2
2-3
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
Sample Date
12/12/2019
12/12/2019
Range Mean Ref.
12/12/2019
12/10/2019
12/10/2019
12/10/2019
12/11/2019
12/11/2019
12/11/2019
12/11/2019
12/10/2019
12/11/2019
12/11/2019
Units
VOCs(8260B)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,700
7,600
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.00083
<0.00080
<0.00094
<0.00079
<0.00088
0.093
<0.00091
<0.0011
<0.00075
<0.0011
<0.0014
1,1-Dichloroethane
3.8
17
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.00070
<0.00068
<0.00079
<0.00067
<0.00074
0.015
<0.00077
<0.00092
<0.00063
<0.00093
<0.0012
1,1-Dichloroethene
48
210
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.0011
<0.0011
<0.0012
<0.0011
0.0012J
0.045
<0.0012
<0.0015
<0.0010
<0.0015
<0.0019
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
63
370
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.0019
<0.0018
<0.0021
<0.0018
0.0072
<0.0024
<0.0020
<0.0024
<0.0017
<0.0025
<0.0032
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
56
320
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.0016
<0.0015
<0.0018
<0.0015
0.0037J
<0.0021
<0.0018
<0.0021
<0.0014
<0.0021
<0.0027
Acetone
12,000
140,000
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.0090
0.053J
<0.010
0.029J
0.084J
<0.012
0.013J
<0.012
0.15
0.16
0.051J
Benzene
1.2
5.4
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.00085
0.0012J
<0.00096
<0.00081
<0.00091
<0.0011
<0.00094
<0.0011
<0.00077
<0.0011
<0.0015
Bromomethane
1.4
6.4
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.0022
<0.0022
<0.0025
<0.0021
0.0071J
<0.0029
<0.0025
<0.0030
<0.0020
<0.0030
<0.0039
Chloromethane
23
99
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.0031
<0.0030
<0.0035
<0.0030
0.011
<0.0041
<0.0034
<0.0041
<0.0028
<0.0041
<0.0054
Ethylbenzene
6.1
27
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.0010
<0.00098
<0.0011
<0.00096
0.0033J
<0.0013
<0.0011
<0.0013
<0.00091
<0.0013
<0.0017
Methylene Chloride
58
650
NA
NA
--
--
--
0.011J
<0.0054
0.00901
<0.0054
0.0068J
<0.0073
<0.0062
<0.0074
<0.0051
<0.0075
<0.0097
Tetrachloroethene
17
82
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.0015
<0.0015
<0.0017
<0.0014
<0.0016
<0.0020
<0.0017
<0.0020
<0.0014
<0.0020
<0.0026
Toluene
990
9,700
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.0015
<0.0015
<0.0017
<0.0015
0.0068
<0.0020
<0.0017
<0.0020
<0.0014
0.0021J
<0.0027
Xylene(Total)
120
530
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.0033
1 <0.0032
<0.0038
<0.0032
1 0.027
<0.0043
1 <0.0037
<0.0044
1 <0.0030
<0.0044
<0.0058
SVOCs(8270D)
1-Methylnaphthalene
18
73
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.52
<1.0
<0.095
<0.98
<0.94
<0.96
<0.097
<0.097
0.14J
<0.11
<0.12
2-Methylnaphthalene
48
600
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.50
<0.98
<0.091
<0.93
<0.90
<0.92
<0.093
<0.093
0.12J
<0.11
<0.12
Acenaphthene
720
9000
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.51
<0.99
<0.092
<0.94
<0.91
<0.93
<0.094
<0.094
<0.10
<0.11
<0.12
Anthracene
3,600
45000
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.51
<1.0
<0.092
<0.95
<0.91
<0.94
<0.094
<0.095
<0.10
<0.11
<0.12
Benz(a)anthracene
1.1
21
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.63
<1.2
<0.11
<1.2
<1.1
<1.2
<0.12
<0.12
<0.13
<0.14
<0.14
Benzo(a)pyrene
0.11
2.1
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.85
<1.7
<0.15
<1.6
<1.5
<1.6
<0.16
<0.16
<0.17
<0.19
<0.20
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
1.1
21
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.79
<1.6
<0.14
<1.5
<1.4
<1.5
<0.15
<0.15
<0.16
<0.17
<0.18
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
NE
NE
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.77
<1.5
<0.14
<1.4
<1.4
<1.4
<0.14
<0.14
<0.15
<0.17
<0.18
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
11
210
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.83
<1.6
<0.15
<1.5
<1.5
<1.5
<0.15
<0.15
<0.17
<0.18
<0.19
Butylbenzylphthalate
290
1,200
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.52
<1.0
<0.095
<0.98
<0.94
<0.96
<0.097
<0.097
<0.11
<0.11
<0.12
Chrysene
110
2,100
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.57
<1.1
<0.10
<1.1
<1.0
<1.0
<0.11
<0.11
<0.11
<0.13
<0.13
Dibenzofuran
15
210
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.49
<0.97
<0.089
<0.92
<0.88
<0.90
<0.091
<0.091
<0.099
<0.11
<0.11
Fluoranthene
480
6,000
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.59
1.7J
<0.11
<1.1
<1.1
<1.1
<0.11
<0.11
<0.12
<0.13
<0.14
Fluorene
480
6,000
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.53
<1.0
<0.095
<0.98
<0.94
<0.97
<0.097
<0.098
<0.11
<0.12
<0.12
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1.1
21
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.90
<1.8
<0.16
<1.7
<1.6
<1.7
<0.17
<0.17
<0.18
<0.20
<0.21
Phenanthrene
NE
NE
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.50
<0.97
<0.090
<0.92
<0.89
<0.91
<0.092
<0.092
<0.10
<0.11
<0.11
Pyrene
360
4,500
NA
NA
--
--
--
<0.54
1.7J
<0.098
<1.0
1 <0.97
<1.0
I <0.10
<0.10
I <0.11
<0.12
<0.13
RCRA Metals (6020/7471171991
Arsenic
0.68
3
0.842
2.44
1.0-18
4.8
A
1.36
9.84
0.306J
1.38
1.95
2.53
0.439J
0.893
0.861
1.49
1.20
Barium
3,100
47,000
121
87.8
50-1,000
356
A
173
770
57.3
45.9
89.1
82.7
103
74.6
105
148
93.1
Cadmium
7.5
110
<0.0861
<0.0985
1.0-10
4.3
B
0.122J
1.83
<0.0878
0.496J
<0.0875
0.195J
<0.0896
<0.0915
0.195J
<0.104
<0.111
Chromium (total)
NE
NE
24.4
51.3
7.0-300
65
A
25.2
38.8
4.04
19.7
21.0
12.1
13.2
13.4
41.4
118
53.5
Hexavalent Chromium
0.31
6.5
<0.274
0.644J
NE
NE
--
<0.314
0.649.1
<0.280
0.476J
0.488J
<0.288
<0.286
<0.292
0.565J
0.684.1
<0.353
Trivalent Chromium
23,000
100,000
24.4
50.7
NE
NE
--
25.2
38.2
4.04
19.2
20.51
12.1
13.2
13.4
40.8
117
53.5
Lead
400
800
7.70
14.4
BRL-50
16
A
59.9
1.320
4.62
ill
119
234
5.78
21.5
24.2
15.5
20.4
Selenium
78.0
1,200
0.377J
0.811
<0.1-0.8
0.121
A
0.411J
0.497J
<0.208
0.327J
0.437J
0.493J
0.289J
0.439J
0.670
0.92
0.691J
Silver
78.0
1,200
<0.167
<0.191
BRL-5.0
0.42
C
<0.191
0.294J
<0.170
<0.183
<0.169
0.214J
<0.174
<0.177
<0.201
<0.202
<0.214
Mercury
1 2.3
1 9.7
1 0.0149J
0.0850
0.03-0.52
INS
I A
1 0.233
1 0.617
1 <0.00307
1 0.0324J
1 0.0878
1 0.101
1 <0.00314
1 0.0319J
1 0.0466
1 0.0258J
0.0782
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (December 2019).
2) Range and mean of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005.
Ref. A. North Carolina soils, B. Southeastern US soils, C. Soils of the conterminous USA
With the exception of metals, only analytes with concentrations above the laboratory reporting limit are shown.
Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
Only VOCs and SVOCs detected in at least one sample are shown.
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
Bold values indicate compounds detected above Residential PSRGs and Site -specific background levels for metals.
Underlined values indicate compounds detected above Industrial/Commercial PSRGs and Site -specific background levels for metals.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi -volatile organic compounds; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act;
ft bgs = feet below the ground surface; NA = Not Analyzed; NE = Not Established; -- = Not Applicable.
J = Estimated value that is less than the laboratory reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit.
Table 2 (Page 2 of 2)
3 020 askr PrgeckV.1erge Gapibl(MRG�V.IRG-0035. Sauntlen S�reM Assemblage\Brpwnfieltls Asse55n,enNTables\5. SawMers �Ma Tades_20200303 Hart & Hickman, PC

Table 3
Summary of Well Construction Details & Groundwater Elevation Data
South Saunders Street Assemblage
Raleigh, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 21050-17-092
H&H Job No. MRG-003
Well ID
Installation
Date
TOC Elevation
(ft)
Well Diameters
(inches)
Total Depth
(ft bgs)
Screen Interval
(ft)
Static Depth to
Groundwater
(ft below TOC)
Groundwater
Elevation
(ft)
TMW-1
12/09/19
486.85
1.0
19
9-19
14.49
472.36
TMW-2
12/09/19
490.16
1.0
20
10-20
14.43
475.73
TMW-3
12/09/19
493.55
1.0
20
10-20
10.46
483.09
TMW-4
12/10/19
494.26
1.0
18
8-18
7.14
487.12
TMW-5
12/10/19
500.69
1.0
18
8-18
11.57
489.12
TMW-6
12/10/19
499.88
1.0
19
9-19
18.09
481.79
TMW-7
12/10/19
497.98
1.0
24
14-24
16.84
481.14
TMW-8
12/10/19
504.31
1.0
24
14-24
20.45
483.86
TMW-9
12/10/19
506.51
1.0
21
11-21
13.64
492.87
Notes:
Depth to groundwater measurements collected on December 11, 2019.
TOC elevations surveyed by the John R. McAdams Company on 12/11/19.
TOC = top of casing; ft = feet; bgs = below ground surface.
Table 3 (Page 1 of 1)
SAAAA-Master Projects\Merge Capital (MRG)\MRG-003 S. Saunders Street Assemblage\Brownfields Assessment\Tables\S. Saunders Data Tables_20200303 Hart & Hickman, PC

Table 4
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data
South Saunders Street Assemblage
Raleigh, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 21050-17-092
H&H Job No. MRG-003
MW-7
TMW-3
DEQ Vapor Intrusion GWSLs
Sample ID
MW-3
TMW-1
TMW-2
TMW-4
TMW-5
TMW-6
TMW-7
TMW-8
TMW-9
NC 2L
MW-7 DUP-1
TMW-3
DUP-GW
Groundwater
Sample Date
12/13/2018
12/13/2018
12/11/2019
12/11/2019
12/12/2019
12/12/2019
12/12/2019
12/12/2019
12/12/2019
12/12/2019
12/12/2019
12/12/2019
Standard)
Residential
GWSLs (2)
Non -Residential
GWSLS(2)
Address
927 South Saunders Street
927 South Saunders Street
1001 South Saunders Street
1015 South Saunders Street
1017 South Saunders Street
Units
pg/L
VOCs (820613)
Acetone
<20.0
<20.0
<20.0
<6.2
<61.7
<154
<154
<6.2
<6.2
10.3J
<6.2
<6.2
<6.2
6,000
4,500,000
19,000,000
Benzene
<5.00
36.9
45.0
<0.15
<1.5
<3.8
<3.8
<0.15
<0.15
<0.15
<0.15
<0.15
<0.15
1
16
69
Bromodichloromethane
<5.00
<5.00
<5.00
<0.26
<2.6
<6.4
<6.4
<0.26
<0.26
<0.26
<0.26
<0.26
1.90
0.6
8.8
38
Chloroform
<5.00
<5.00
<5.00
<2.3
<23.4
<58.5
<58.5
<2.3
<2.3
<2.3
<2.3
<2.3
13.9
70
8.1
36
Ethylbenzene
7.36
10.7
12.9
<0.26
202
1520
1�30
<0.26
<0.26
<0.26
<0.26
0.5901
<0.26
600
35
150
Isopropylbenzene (cumene)
38.9
28.8
44.2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
70
180
750
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
<5.00
<5.00
<5.00
<0.28
<2.8
<6.9
<6.9
<0.28
<0.28
0.470J
<0.28
<0.28
<0.28
20
4,500
20,000
Naphthalene
120
<5.00
<5.00
<0.35
303
1590
1�90
<0.35
<0.35
<0.35
0.490J
<0.35
<0.35
6
35
150
n-Butylbenzene
4.60J
5.51
8.08
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
70
NE
NE
N-Propylbenzene
30.5
28.7
38.1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
70
490
2,000
sec-Butylbenzene
4.81J
6.56
8.04
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
70
NE
NE
Styrene
<5.00
<5.00
<5.00
<0.27
<2.7
24.9J
24.8J
<0.27
<0.27
<0.27
<0.27
<0.27
<0.27
70
1,900
7,800
tert-Butylbenzene
2.11J
3.12J
4.28J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
70
NE
NE
Tetrachloroethene
<5.00
<5.00
<5.00
2.90
<1.6
<4.0
<4.0
6.00
<0.16
<0.16
<0.16
<0.16
<0.16
0.7
12
48
Toluene
<5.00
15.6
19.7
<0.24
<2.4
707
664
<0.24
<0.24
<0.24
<0.24
0.280J
<0.24
600
3,800
16,000
Trichloroethene
<5.00
<5.00
<5.00
0.830J
<2.2
<5.5
<5.5
<0.22
<0.22
<0.22
<0.22
<0.22
<0.22
3
1.0
4.4
Xylene (Total)
<10.0
10.4
9.88J
<0.63
627
9 920
9550
<0.63
<0.63
<0.63
<0.63
3.40
<0.63
500
77
320
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
<5.00
<5.00
<5.00
13.0
<2.9
14.7J
14AJ
<0.29
<0.29
<0.29
<0.29
<0.29
<0.29
70
NE
NE
p-Isopropyltoluene
<5.00
5.45
7.01
<0.21
<2.1
<5.3
<5.3
<0.21
<0.21
<0.21
<0.21
<0.21
<0.21
25*
NE
NE
SVOCs (8270D)
1-Methylnaphthalene
3.17
5.08
5.02
<1.4
61.1
134
138
<1.4
<1.4
<1.4
<1.4
<1.4
<1.4
1*
NE
NE
2-Methylnaphthalene
5.61
7.09
7.86
<1.4
83.0
200
201
<1.4
<1.4
<1.4
<1.4
<1.4
<1.4
30
NE
NE
Naphthalene
40.1
<1.76
<1.76
<1.4
196
813
819
<1.4
<1.4
<1.4
<1.4
<1.4
<1.4
6
35
150
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
<92.6
<92.6
<92.6
11.3
9.30
<2.1
<2.1
<2.1
<2.1
<2.1
<2.1
<2.1
<2.1
3
NE
NE
Metals (6020B/7470A)
Arsenic
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
0.483J
0.715J
0.344J
0.290J
<0.250
0.355J
1.62J
<0.250
0.416J
<0.250
10
NE
NE
Barium
276
455
467
102
207
297
296
63.3
156
92.2
74.2
80.7
37.1
700
NE
NE
Cadmium
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<0.160
<0.160
<0.160
<0.160
<0.160
<0.160
<0.160
<0.160
<0.160
<0.160
2
NE
NE
Chromium
2.08
2.10
<2.00
<0.540
0.770J
<0.540
0.688J
1.29J
<0.540
17.5
2.97
4.38
1.68J
10
NE
NE
Lead
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
0.423J
1.34J
2.71
3.07
0.572J
0.792J
4.43
3.01
1.34J
1.14J
15
NE
NE
Selenium
<5.00
<5.00
<5.00
<0.380
<0.380
0.424J
<0.380
0.423J
<0.380
1.48J
0.526J
<0.380
<0.380
20
NE
NE
Silver
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<0.310
<0.310
<0.310
<0.310
<0.310
<0.310
<0.310
<0.310
<0.310
<0.310
20
NE
NE
Mercury
<0.200
<0.200
<0.200
<0.0490
<0.0490
<0.0490
<0.0490
<0.0490
<0.0490
<0.0490
<0.0490
<0.0490
<0.0490
1
0.18
NE
General Chemistry (OIA 1677)
Cyanide (available)
<0.00200
<0.00200
<0.00200
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
70
NE
NE
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) 15A NCAC 02L.0202 Groundwater Standards (NC 2L Standards) (April 2013).
2) DEQ Vapor Intrusion Ground Water Screening Levels (GWSLs) (February 2018).
*2L Standard has not been established; therefore, the Interim Maximum Allowable Concentration was used.
Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown.
Compound concentrations reported to the laboratory method detection limits.
Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (pg/L).
Laboratory analytical method is shown in parentheses.
Bold values indicate compounds detected above NC 2L Standard (April 2013).
Underlined values indicate compounds detected above Residential GWSLs.
Highlighted values indicate compounds detected above Non -Residential GWSLs.
J = Estimated value that is less than the laboratory reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi -volatile organic compounds; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act;
NA = Not Analyzed; NE = Not Established.
Table 4 (Page 1 of 1)
SAAAA-Master Projects\Merge Capital (MRG)\MRG-003 S. Saunders Street Aa-blageS-fields Assessmenffables\S. Saunders Data Tables_20200303
3/5/2020 Hart & Hickman, PC

Table 5
Summary of Surface Water Analytical Data
South Saunders Street Assemblage
Raleigh, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 21050-17-092
H&H Job No. MRG-003
SW-2
Sample ID
SW-1
SW-3
NC 2B Surface Water Standards
SW-2
DUP-SW
Sample Date
12/12/2019
12/12/2019
12/12/2019
Chronic
Acute
Location
Upstream
Mid -Stream
Downstream
Units
pg/L
VOCs (8206B)
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
13.2
11.8
12.3
34,000*
--
Trichloroethene
<0.22
0.57J
30
--
SVOCs (8270D)
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
10.7
9.5
12.6
12.5
0.37*
--
Metals (6020B/7470A)
Arsenic
<0.250
<0.250
0.280J
0.361 J
340
150
Barium
61.5
63.4
64.7
63.1
1,000
NS
Cadmium
<0.160
<0.160
<0.160
<0.160
2.33 (h)
0.37 (h)
Calcium
22,000
22,900
22,900
22,500
NE
NE
Chromium
0.794J
0.744J
0.644J
0.837J
489.12 (h)
63.63 (h)
Lead
1.16J
0.821 J
0.824J
1.46J
52.69 (h)
2.05 (h)
Magnesium
6,240
6,490
6,540
6,340
NE
NE
Selenium
<0.380
<0.380
<0.380
<0.380
5 (t)
NE
Silver
<0.310
<0.310
<0.310
<0.310
2.33 (h)
0.06
Mercury
<0.0490
<0.0490
<0.0490
<0.0490
0.012 (t)
NE
Hardness SM 2340
Median Hardness Value
Hardness
80,700
83,800
84,200
82,200
83,000
Notes:
1. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality's (DEQ's) 15A NCAC 02B Surface Water Quality Standards and Criteria for Class C; NSW waters (213 Standards) (June 10, 2019).
2. Standard derived using the DEQ Hardness -Dependent Metal Calculator dated September 22, 2017 using the median hardness for the samples collected of 83 milligrams per liter as CaCO3.
With the exception of metals, only analytes with concentrations above the laboratory reporting limit are shown.
Surface water concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (pg/L).
Bold indicates concentration 213 Standard.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi -volatile organic compounds; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act;
-- = Not Applicable; BRL = Below Laboratory Reporting Limit; NA = Not Analyzed; NE = Not Established.
J = Estimated value that is less than the laboratory reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit.
(h) = metal is hardness -dependent. See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 for more information.
(t) = based upon measurement of total recoverable metal. See 15A NCAC 02B .0211 for more information.
* = No NC 2B Standard established, value shown is the lower of the North Carolina In -Stream Target Value or EPA National Water Quality Criteria dated June 2019.
Table 5 (Page 1 of 1)
3/ 52020 SAAAA-Master Projects\Merge Capital (MRG)\MRG-003 S. Saunders Street Assemblage\Brownfields Assessment\Tables\S. Saunders Data Tables_20200303 Hart &Hickman, PC

Table 6
Summary of Sediment Analytical Data
South Saunders Street Assemblage
Raleigh, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 21050-17-092
H&H Job No. MRG-003
SED-2
Sample ID
SED-1
SED-3
Residential
PSRGs')
Industrial/
Commercial
PSRGs(')
Site -Specific Background Levels
Regional Background
Metals in Soil(2)
SED-2
DUP-SED
Sample Date
12/12/2019
12/12/2019
12/12/2019
SB-21
SB-22
Location
Upstream
Mid -Stream
Downstream
12/12/2019
12/12/2019
Range
Mean
Ref.
Units
mg/kg
VOCs (8206B)
Acetone
<0.0091
<0.011
<0.012
0.049J
12,000
140,000
NA
NA
--
--
--
Toluene
<0.0016
<0.0019
0.0024J
<0.0015
990
9,700
NA
NA
--
--
--
SVOCs (8270D)
Acenaphthylene
<0.10
<0.11
<0.11
0.15J
NE
NE
NA
NA
--
--
--
Benz(a)anthracene
<0.13
<0.15
<0.15
0.20J
1.1
21
NA
NA
--
--
--
Benzo(a)pyrene
<0.18
<0.20
<0.21
0.20J
0.11
2.1
NA
NA
--
--
--
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
<0.17
<0.19
<0.19
0.24J
1.1
21
NA
NA
--
--
--
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
<0.17
<0.18
<0.19
0.16J
NE
NE
NA
NA
--
--
--
Chrysene
<0.12
<0.14
<0.14
0.14J
110
2,100
NA
NA
--
--
--
Fluoranthene
<0.13
<0.14
0.21 J
0.23J
480
6,000
NA
NA
--
--
--
Phenanthrene
<0.11
<0.12
0.13J
0.12J
NE
NE
NA
NA
--
--
--
Pyrene
<0.12
<0.13
0.29J
0.34J
360
4,500
NA
NA
--
--
--
RCRA Metals (6020B/7470A/7199)
Arsenic
0.406J
1.36
1.27
0.246J
0.68
3
0.842
2.44
1.0-18
4.8
A
Barium
16.2
63.8
57.7
11.5
3,100
47,000
121
87.8
50-1,000
356
A
Cadmium
<0.0987
0.171J
0.141J
<0.0958
7.5
110
<0.0861
<0.0985
1.0-10
4.3
B
Chromium (total)
4.48
14.0
12.7
2.82
NE
NE
24.4
51.3
7.0-300
65
A
Hexavalent Chromium
<0.314
0.448J
0.954.1
<0.305
0.31
6.5
<0.274
0.644J
NE
NE
--
Trivalent Chromium
4.48
13.55
11.75
2.82
23,000
100,000
24.4
50.7
NE
NE
--
Lead
5.99
21.1
20.5
4.56
400
800
7.70
14.4
BRL-50
16
A
Selenium
<0.234
0.295J
0.372J
<0.228
78.0
1,200
0.377J
0.811
<0.1-0.8
0.121
A
Silver
<0.191
<0.223
<0.222
<0.186
78.0
1,200
<0.167
<0.191
BRL-5.0
0.42
C
Mercury
<0.00345
0.0222J
0.0389J
0.0121J
2.3
9.7
0.0149J
0.0850
0.03-0.52
NS
A
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (December 2019).
2) Range and mean of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005.
Ref. A. North Carolina soils, B. Southeastern US soils, C. Soils of the conterminous USA
With the exception of metals, only analytes with concentrations above the laboratory reporting limit are shown.
Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
Bold values indicate compounds detected above Residential PSRGs and Site -specific background concentrations.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi -volatile organic compounds; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; NE = Not Established; -- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Analyzed.
J = Estimated value that is less than the laboratory reporting limit and greater than or equal to the method detection limit.
Table 6 (Page 1 of 1)
SAAAA-Master Projects\Merge Capital (MRG)\MRG-003 S. Saunders Street Assemblage\Brownfields Assessment\Tables\S. Saunders Data Tables_20200303
3/5/2020 Hart & Hickman, PC

Table 7
Summary of TCLP Analytical Data
South Saunders Street Assemblage
South Saunders Street
Raleigh, North Carolina
H&H Job No. KCO-001
Depth
TCLP
TCLP
TCLP
TCLP
TCLP
TCLP
TCLP
TCLP
Sample ID
Sample Date
(ft bgs)
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for the Toxicity
5.0
100.0
1.0
5.0
5.0
0.2
1.0
5.0
Characteristic October 2009
Units
mg/L
SB-4
2-3
8/30/2021
0.60
0.0066 J
0.019 J
SB-7
5-6
8/30/2002
0.69
0.0043 J
0.0045 J
SB-11
1-2
8/30/2021
1
1.20
0.012
0.052 J
Notes:
mg/L = milligrams per liter; TCLP = toxicity characteristic leaching procedure
Analytical Method:
EPA Method 6010D
Table 7 (Page 1 of
11)
hhtttp52 21 rthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Kane Realty Corporation (KCO)/EMP/Soil Data for Metals.xlsx Hart &Hickman, PC

Appendix A
Redevelopment Plans
10
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

PARK CITY SOUTH — PHASE 1A PD DESIGN PRINCIPLES — POD A
PD/UDO PRINCIPLE
ADDRESSED IN POD A
PROHIBITED USES
CAR WASH VEHICLE REPAIR
NONE OF THESE USES ARE PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT
GAS STATION
FREIGHT AND SERVICE FACILITY
TRAILER STORAGE AND DROP OFF LOT
BUS BARN
TRUCKING OPERATION
TRUCK OR MOTOR FREIGHT TERMINAL FACILITY
PAWN SHOPS
ADULT ESTABLISHMENTS
BUILDING HEIGHT
20 STORIES MAX
PROPOSED 11 STORIES
POD A MAXIMUM
OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL — 700,000 SF
PROPOSED 16,800 SF RETAIL/OFFICE SPACE AND
DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY
RETAIL — 167,000 SF
336 RESIDENTIAL UNITS
LODGING UNITS — 150 UNITS
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS — 510
OVERALL DEVELOPMENT
NO MORE THAN 50% OF OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL MAY BE INDUSTRIAL
NO INDUSTRIAL USES ARE PROPOSED FOR THIS POD
INDUSTRIAL SPACE
OVERALL DEVELOPMENT
AT LEAST 5% OF THE DWELLING UNITS CONSTRUCTED ON THE
5% OF DWELLING UNITS ARE NO GREATER THAN 550 GSF
HOUSING VARIATION
PROPERTY SHALL BE NO LARGER THAN 550 GSF
PROTECTIVE YARDS
NO PROTECTIVE YARDS (STREET OR TRANSITIONAL) REQUIRED
NO PROTECTIVE YARDS PROVIDED
BUILDING/PARKING SETBACKS
S. SAUNDERS — 0'
NO SETBACK ALONG S. SAUNDERS
DAWSON — 5' + TCA WIDTH
NO BUILDING OR PARKING IS LOCATED WITHIN 5' OF TCA
ALONG DAWSON
SIGHT TRIANGLES
NO BUILDING SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN A SIGHT DISTANCE
NO BUILDING IS LOCATED WITHIN A SIGHT DISTANCE
TRIANGLE EASEMENT
TRIANGLE EASEMENT
BUILD TO
S. SAUNDERS — 0'-20' AT 407.
SHEET C2.1 SHOWS BUILDING MEETS BUILD —TO
REQUIREMENT ALONG S. SAUNDERS
GROUND STORY
THE GROUND STORY OF STRUCTURED PARKING MUST HAVE
THE GROUND STORY SURROUNDING THE PARKING DECK IS
SURROUNDING PARKING
ACTIVE USES LOCATED BETWEEN THE PARKING STRUCTURE AND
PROPOSED TO BE RETAIL/OFFICE SPACE FACING
THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ALONG S SAUNDERS STREET
S. SAUNDERS
BUILDING ENTRANCES
EACH BUILDING FRONTING ALONG S SAUNDERS SHALL HAVE AT
POD A PROPOSES AT LEAST 2 ENTRANCES ALONG
LEAST ONE ENTRANCE FACING S SAUNDERS. FOR A BUILDING
S SAUNDERS
THAT HAS A LENGTH GREATER THAN 150 FEET ALONG
S SAUNDERS, ONE ADDITIONAL ENTRANCE FACING S SAUNDERS
MULTIPLE BUILDINGS
THERE SHALL BE A DIFFERENCE OF AT LEAST 2 STORIES IN
FOR ZONING PURPOSES, 1 BUILDING IS PROPOSED FOR
HEIGHT BETWEEN THE TALLEST BUILDING AT SHORTEST BUILDING
THE SITE
WITHIN IN POD
AMENITY AREA
MINIMUM OF 10% TOTAL SITE AREA — CAN BE REALLOCATED
POD A IS PROVIDING MORE THAN THE REQUIRED 10% FOR
AMONG PODS WITHIN DEVELOPMENT
THE POD. THE ADDITIONAL AMENITY AREA WILL BE USED
TO COUNT TOWARDS THE AMENITY AREA REQUIREMENT ON
OTHER PODS
TREE CONSERVATION
MINIMUM OF 10% OF TOTAL SITE AREA — APPLIED TO THE
POD A WILL PROVIDE 10% TCA FOR THE PHASE 1A SITE
PROPERTY AS A WHOLE RATHER THAN ON A POD —BY —POD
AREA. ADDITIONAL TCA WILL BE PROVIDED ON OTHER
BASIS
PODS AT LATER PHASES TO MEET THE ENTIRE SITE TCA
REQUIREMENT.
PARKING
A MINIMUM OF ONE PARKING SPACE IS REQUIRED PER
DWELLING UNIT. NO VEHICLE PARKING REQUIRED FOR FIRST 16
DWELLING UNITS.
ONE PARKING SPACE PER 500 SF FOR ALL NONRESIDENTIAL GSF,
OR THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES SET FORTH IN
UDO SECTION 7.1.2.C, WHICHEVER IS LESS. NO VEHICLE PARKING
IS REQUIRED FOR THE FIRST 10,000 GSF.
POD A WILL COMPLY WITH THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS
SET FORTH IN THE PD. COMPLIANCE IS SHOWN ON SHEET
NO VEHICLE PARKING IS REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLOWING USES
C2.0.
AND USE CATEGORIES UP TO 30,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS
FLOOR AREA PROVIDED WHEN AT LEAST 25% OF THE GROUND
FLOOR OF THE BUILDING IS DEVOTED TO SUCH USES: INDOOR
RECREATION; PERSONAL SERVICE; RESTAURANT; RETAIL SALES;
AND BANKS. NO COMBINATION OF THE ABOVE SHALL EXCEED
30,000 EXEMPTED SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA.
NO PARKING IS REQUIRED FOR AN INDOOR MOVIE THEATER.
PARKING FOR OVERNIGHT LODGING REQUIRES ONLY ONE—HALF
OF THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN UDO SEC. 7.1.2
STREET TYPES
S. SAUNDERS STREET:
POD A COMPLIES WITH ALL STREET SECTIONS.
AND SIDEWALK WIDTHS
MAIN STREET WITH PARALLEL PARKING (NO UDO MODIFICATION)
INTERIOR STREET SECTIONS A AND B:
AS DESCRIBED PER THE PD (UDO MODIFICATION)
BLOCK PERIMETER
BLOCK PERIMETER STANDARDS SHALL BE SATISFIED FOR THE
THE FUTURE INTERNAL PUBLIC ROAD WILL SATISFY THE
DEVELOPMENT BASED UPON THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED
BLOCK PERIMETER REQUIREMENT FOR THE ENTIRE
PUBLIC STREET NETWORK.
DEVELOPMENT.
LAKE WHEELER ROAD AND
THE APPLICANT WILL DEDICATE THE LAND AREA NECESSARY TO
THE PROPOSED RIGHT—OF—WAY DEDICATION "BUMP OUT"
S. SAUNDERS INTERSECTION
CONSTRUCT THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE LAKE WHEELER AND
IS BASED ON THE FUTURE S SAUNDERS ROAD ALIGNMENT.
S SAUNDERS INTERSECTION
THE PROJECT WILL CONSTRUCT THE CURB LINE IN THE
"BUMP OUT" BASED ON THIS FUTURE ROAD ALIGNMENT.
PUBLIC ACCESS/GREENWAY
A 75' WIDE CITY OF RALEIGH GREENWAY EASEMENT AND A 10'
THE EASEMENTS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED ON THE PLANS.
EASEMENT
WIDE PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF
ROCKY BRANCH CREEK ARE REQUIRED PER THE PD.
BICYCLE REPAIR STATION
AT LEAST ONE BICYCLE REPAIR STATION SHALL BE LOCATED
POD A WILL PROVIDE A BICYCLE REPAIR STATION WITHIN
WITHIN EACH OF THE PODS.
THE BUILDING TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.
DUMPSTERS
DUMPSTERS WILL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDINGS.
PHASE 1A COMPLIES.
ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL
CITY OF RALEIGH AND/OR NCDOT STANDARDS AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
SURVEY NOTE:
EXISTING INFORMATION TAKEN FROM BOUNDARY/TOPOGRAPHIC
SURVEY PROVIDED BY KCI ASSOCIATES OF NC, 4505 FALLS
OF NEUSE RD., FLOOR 4, RALEIGH, NC 27609. PHONE:
919-783-9266 AND DATED DECEMBER 1, 2020.
PROJECT OWNER AND CONSULTANT
OWNER:
CS SMITH LLC
2321 BLUE RIDGE RD, SUITE 202
RALEIGH, NC 27607
PHONE: [phone]
ATTN.: COREY MASON
[e-mail]
SITE DEVELOPER:
KANE REALTY CORPORATION
4321 LASSITER AT NORTH HILLS AVE #250
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PHONE: [phone]
ATTN.: DREW YATES
[e-mail]
CIVIL ENGINEER:
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
421 FAYETTEVILLE ST., SUITE 600
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27601
PHONE: [phone]
ATTN.: CHRIS BOSTIC, P.E.
[e-mail]
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
421 FAYETTEVILLE ST., SUITE 600
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27601
PHONE: [phone]
ATTN.: MATT GROSS, PLA
[e-mail]
SURVEYOR:
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NC
4505 FALLS OF NEUSE ROAD, FLOOR 4
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PHONE: [phone]
ATTN.: ERIC M. MANTRUCK, PLS
[e-mail]
N
W E
S
GREENSBORO
• 4 0 ■III/
OXFORD
501
15
L0UIS BURG
00 1
URHAM
� WAKE FOREST
40
E
5
APEX Is
t
SANFORD
v KNIGHTDAL6000-
CARY• LE • 9
440 PROJECT
GARNER • LOCATION
CLAYTON
• (�
540
FUQUAY—VARINA 11 10000
95
PROJECT LOCATION
NTS
ADMINISTRATIVE SITE REVIEW
PARK CITY SOUTH
- PHASE 1 A
ASR-0006-2021
SKETCH TRANS.# SCOPE-0150-2020
PARK CITY SOUTH — OVERALL MAXIMUM DESIGN INTENSITIES
EXISTING
PROPOSED
ALLOWABLE INTENSITY
INTENSITY
INTENSITY
POD A
OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL — 700,000 SF
0 SF
RETAIL/OFFICE — 16,800 SF
RETAIL — 167,000 SF
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS — 336
LODGING UNITS — 150 UNITS
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS — 510
POD B
OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL — 700,000 SF
0 SF
0 SF
RETAIL — 167,000 SF
LODGING UNITS — 240 UNITS
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS — 510
POD C
OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL — 700,000 SF
0 SF
0 SF
RETAIL — 167,000 SF
LODGING UNITS — 240 UNITS
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS — 510
POD D
OPEN SPACE AND RECREATIONAL USES
0 SF
0 SF
OVERALL
OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL — 1,042,600 SF
0 SF
RETAIL/OFFICE — 16,800 SF
MAXIMUM
RETAIL — 312,500 SF
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS — 336
LODGING UNITS — 382 UNITS
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS — 975
NO MORE THAN 50% OF OFFICE/
INDUSTRIAL MAY BE INDUSTRIAL
Administrative Site Review Application
Planning and Development Customer Service Center • One Exchange Plaza, Suite 400 1 Raleigh, NC 27601 1 919-996-2500
MP-3-18
927 S SAUNDERS ST.
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603
A DEVELOPMENT BY: KANE REALTY COPORATION
4321 LASSITER AT NORTH HILLS AVE #250
RALEIGH, NC 27609
A
�00/
00
1
Raleigh
This form is required when submitting site plans as referenced in Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Section
10.2.8. Please check the appropriate building types and include the plan checklist document when submitting.
Office Use Only: Case #: _ Planner (print):
Please review UDO Section 10.2.8. as amended by text change case TC-14-19 to determine the site plan tier. If
assistance determining a Site Plan Tier is needed a Site Plan Tier Verification request can be submitted online via the
Permit and Development Portal. (Note: There is a fee for this verification service.)
Site Plan Tier: Tier Two Site Plan ❑ Tier Three Site Plan ❑✓
Building Type Site Transaction History
❑ Detached
❑ General
Subdivision case #:
❑SCOping/sketch
Attached
❑✓ Mixed use
plan Case #: SCOPE-0150-2020
Certificate of Appropriateness #:
❑ Apartment
❑ Open lot
Board of Adjustment #:
❑ Townhouse
❑ Civic
Zoning Case #: Z-32-18
—
Administrative Alternate #:
GENERAL INFORMATION
Development name: Park City South - Phase 1A
Inside City limits? Yes
v-
No
Property address(es).927 S Saunders Street, Raleigh, NC
Site P.I.N.(s): 1703442683,1703442592, 1703444408, 1703444451, 1703446541, 1703442776,1703444797,1703453051
Please describe the scope of work. Include any additions, expansions, and change of use.
-Project includes the demolition of existing buildings, parking areas, and associated infrastructure and
the construction of a proposed multi -use development with multi -family residential and ground floor
retail, restaurants, and office space with associated infrastructure. The project also includes the
construction of a greenway on the site.
Current Property Owner/Developer Contact Name: Drew Yates (Kane Realty)
NOTE: please attach purchase agreement when submitting this form.
Company: CS Smith LLC Title:
Address:2321 Blue Ridge Rd, Suite 202, Raleigh, INC 27607
Phone #: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Applicant Name: Tim Carter, E.I.
Company: Kimley-Horn and Associates, LLC
Address: 421 Fayetteville St, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27601
Phone #: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
DEVELOPMENT TYPE + SITE DATE TABLE
(Applicable to all developments)
SITE DATA
BUILDING DATA
Zoning district (if more than one, please provide the
acreage of each):
PD
Existing gross floor area (not to be demolished):
0
Existing gross floor area to be demolished:
15,250
Gross site acreage:6.14
New gross floor area: 371,640
# of parking spaces required:377
Total sf gross (to remain and new):371,640
# of parking spaces proposed: 683
Proposed # of buildings:1
Overlay District (if applicable): N/A
Proposed # of stories for each: 1 o
Existing use (UDO 6.1.4): Retail, Vehicle Service, Vacant
round Story Uses, and Multi -Family Residential
Proposed use (UDO 6.1.4): Retail, Restaurant. Otfice, other
STORMWATER INFORMATION
Existing Impervious Surface.
Proposed Impervious Surface:
Acres: '.35 Square Feet: 58.810
Acres: 3.33 Square Feet: 145.054
Is this a flood hazard area? Yes7 No ✓
If yes, please provide:
Alluvial soils:
Flood study:
FEMA Map Panel #:
Neuse River Buffer Yes ❑ No ❑✓ I Wetlands Yes ❑ No ❑✓
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS
Total # of dwelling units: 336
1 Total # of hotel units: 0
# of bedroom units: 1 br 244 20r 87 3br 5 4br or more 0
# of lots:l
I Is your project a cottage court? Yes❑ No ✓❑
SIGNATURE BLOCK
In filing this plan as the property owner(s), I/we do hereby agree and firmly bind ourselves, my/our heirs,
executors, administrators, successors, and assigns jointly and severally to construct all improvements and make
all dedications as shown on this proposed development plan as approved by the City of Raleigh.
I hereby designate Klrnley-Nonnand A,`ovaw-, In.to serve as my agent regarding
this application, to receive and response to administrative comments, to resubmit plans on my behalf, and to
represent me in any public meeting regarding this application.
I/we have read, acknowledge, and affirm that this project is conforming to all application requirements applicable
with the proposed development use. I a nowledge that this application is subject to the filing calendar and
submittal policy, which s appli swill expire after 180 days of inactivity.
Signature:
Date:
Printed Name: /1/jgyaj( ['g 5 t
Page 1 of 2 REVISION 11.1920 Page 2 of 2
raleighnc.gov
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: NC CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION: F-0102
) iorn
© 2021 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET — SUITE 600 — RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27601
PHONE: [phone]
i
REVISION 11.18.20
raleighnc.gov
This document, together with the concepts and
designs presented herein, as an instrument of
services, is intended only for the specific purpose
and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and
improper reliance on this document without written
authorization and adaptation by Kimley—Horn and
Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley—Horn
Copyright Kimley—Horn and Associates, Inc., 2021
I,eadDr
fn Dorothea Dr
e Wary
\ ` _ esters alvd.
ROckY Pronch
k5w eJ, 70
r o
Dord6* �011
00
Cate+sd � �l
s y M
A
alin Lirthmr Kin
Q
­tton Elementary
PROJECT
SITE
�i
�OrkY Bran��
CARALE1 H/FULLER
HEIGHTS
a+ 70
cMount Hope Cemetery s
401 i
N c
l
VICINITY MAP N SCALE: 1 = 500'
W E
S
U U
m
Ld
o
00 00
z z Cn
w LJ z
O
O O
w
U U
N O
KANE
REALTY CORPORATION
IlVerae CaDitall
SHEET LIST TABLE
Sheet Number
Sheet Title
CO.0
COVER SHEET
COA
ALTERNATE MATERIAL REQUEST
CO.2
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
C1.0
EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITON PLAN
C2.0
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
C2.1
PRELIMINARY BUILD —TO TRUCK TURN EXHIBIT
C2.2
PLAT EXHIBIT
C3.0
PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C4.0
PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
C10.0
SAND FILTER DETAILS
TC1.0
TREE CONSERVATION PLAN
1-1.0
LANDSCAPE PLAN
L2.0
LANDSCAPE DETAILS
ARCH
ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS
JANUARY 27, 2021
JOB NUMBER:
011440027
Kimley*Horn
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
RALEIGH, NC 27601
PHONE: [phone]
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
#F-0102
JDAVIS>I
z
:�i
:�i
m
H
3:
U
U
0
O
N
O
LLJ N
O
u
00
N
�\
r
r
o N
mLd
o
o
Q
\
w
Z
Z
Y
= O
_J
c�
O
Q
Cn
Q
w
0
W
D_
=
cn
o
o
0
W
W
2
W
O
U
1
U
z
Z
OQ��
LL
LIJ
U)
0
Q
w
0.
LLJ
W
Wi1�
Z
1..�
CD
Q
LL-
O
0
^
U
SHEET NUMBER
C0.0

v U >-
m m m
0
M
Q
a
0
i
0
T
0
E
Y
0
0
c
0
0
Q
0
0
a
� Y
T
C
0
r o
Q
0 0
a
0 °
0
0
C
0
0
N
0
Q
J o
In -
n 0
o �
E
� O
O �
0
Q 0
0
N N
m �
0 C
-C:: 0
0 a
C �
0 Q
� o
O
� o
T �
N
0 a
a o
Q
u
J
J o
Y 0
a
c
0
b 0
� a
„ U
U
a
T
o
o
0
C
O
�J C
Y �
J
Q�
r
- o
Q
> c
E
Z
Y .C:
0
0
J .T
0 a
� 0
0
_J c
0
cn
Q
r o
- a
J a
C
Y o
r 0
QQ
0
�U
3
�E
D
O
0 O
Q) a
o�
.I
=' Raleigh Fire Department
Office of the Fire Marshal
310 W. Martin Street, Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27602
Office: [phone]
Alternate Material, Design or Methods Application
Transaction No. ASR-0006-2021
Design Professional: Chris Bostic, PE Phone #: [phone]
,TtTIIl1y/,
Signature:
Building Address: sunders St. 032562
I N
Alternate Material, Design or Methods Application requires 10 bi1'sst11l4S1s`Ai 3R fol? review. In
accordance with 2018 NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AND POLICIES
Section 105 Alternative Material, Design or Methods.
I am requesting review of an alternate or modification to the provisions of Section
503.2.3 _ of the 2018 NCFPC, Chapter 5 CODE:
This code section requires: Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained
to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all-weather
driving capabilities.
ProposedAlternate: (Include drawings to clearly illustrate request, before and
after if appropriate) 503.2.3 - Grasspave2 Structural Soil system and asphalt greenway
located within the fire access path along the City of Raleigh Greenway. The path runs on the east
side of the proposed building from the SE corner to the NW corner of the site.
Reason for Request: To achieve required hose pull lengths for the Phase 1 A building.
GRASSPAVE2 FIRELANE
STRAPPING TAPE
CONTAINS ENHEI
GRAVEL. NOWSHRNK
MORTAR, CONCRETE
ETC.
FLUSH MOUNTED S
MARKER WITH
NTEGRATE0 OR
REM OVARIE ANCHI
(BY OTHERS)
GRASSPAVE2 FIRELANE
SHRUB MASS
EASED
t A A ACURB, HEI
��1E•�itiIGA�If�irlll��ElVARES
GRAVELROADBASE CURB
«» a► «
i �:•i:•i•: is t•t `
0
UPLIGHT
FIMRE
�11�ti►,
_ A A n•�
it'i�A
NOTE:
THIS DETAL IS SCHEMATIC N NATURE. DESIGNER SHALL SPECIFY SPACING AND DESIGN OF EDGE
TREATMENTS. SPACING WILL VARY WITH TURF TYPE, SLOPE, FIRE OEPARTMRNT REQUIREMENTS, ETC..
NOT TO SCALE
GRASSPAVE2
SIDLE 9TRUCTUREa"
InV'sible Structures, Inc.
GP2Firelanel I .dW9
INVISIBLE
STRUCTURES'
303-233-8383
W W w.invisiblestructures.com
V4.1
Request For Alternate Material, Design or Methods
Staff Use Only
Page 2 of 2
Date Received- 1� _ Z)_ Z U 2 1
Evaluation of Proposal by: RFD Office of the Fire Marshal
Suitability:
Strength:
Effectiveness:
Fire Resistance:
Durability:
Safety:
Sanitation:
Recommended Action: APPROVE DENY By:
Conditions:
Additional Information on Proposed Alternate:
Approved by:
,S- 2 1-2)
Compressive Test Results - GRASSPAVE2 and GRAVELPAVE2
A • G • Wassenaar 2IBO South Ivanhoe Street. Salta 5
0--or, Colorado 80222-5710
303-750.8100 Fax [phone]
Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants www.agwassenaar,com
ASTM D1621-10 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH RESULTS
MARCH 13, 2015
Grasspave2 Sand -filled Ring Units
Source: 1001% Recycled HDPE Resins
Form Tested: Four sand -filled Rings attached by grid and confined by taping (see
photographs)
I14e1 Area o.nu x o.uu x l u = ;01.st9 sq. in.
Total Load Gross Area Net Area Deflection
Sample No. Ibt sjs Strength (psi) Strength (psi) fial
1
500,000* 15,940 15,940 0.575
2
500,000* 15,940 15,940 0.581
3
500,000* 15,940 15,940 0.579
Average 15,940 15,940 0.578
Note: 1.
*Maximum total load was not achieved, 500,000 pounds is the maximum load of this
testing machine.
2.
Testing Machine: Forney Model No. F-502F-F96
Serial No. 03040
Capacity: 500,000 pounds
3.
Silica Sand: Oglebay/Norton washed silica sand, Colorado Springs, Colorado
4.
Sand was confined by taping ring edges,
5.
i
Area calculated is the total gross and net area including the area filled by sand.
I
I
INVISIBLE
STRUCTURES'
§DGRASSPAVE2 �GRAVELPAVEZ
Soil Permeability Rates
Data from "Civil Engineering Design Manual",
1995-
Soil Type Coeff cm/sec Rate cm/sec
Rate in/min
Rate in/hr
Description
GW 2.5 EE -2 0.16
3.78
226.77
Well graded, clean gravels, gravel/sand mixtures
GP 5 EE -2 0.04
0.94
56.69
Poorly graded, clean gravels, gravel/sand mixtures
SW 5 EE -4 0.0016
0.04
2.27
Well graded, clean sands, gravely sands
SP 5 EE -4 0.0016
0.04
2.27
poorly graded, clean sands, sand/gravel mix
Best base course for GP2 and GV2 would be mix of 2/3GP and 1/3GW
Rate cm/sec
Rate in/min
Rate in/hr
0.0272
0.64
38.55
TABLE
;SAUNDERS
IED 10'
r GREENWAY
t
J I
r
i
H-20 and HS-20 loading
H-20 Loading HS-20 Loading
8000 lbs 32,000 lbs 8000 lbs 32,000 lbs 32,000 lb,
Dynamic •.• Sample Calculation
Wheel. oad = WL= 8000Ibs (32,000 lb axle / 4)
32,000 lb load for single rear axle
Dynamic Force = Fa =1.2 (20%greater than static force)
Spread 'Area = A = 256 si (12"cover w/45 degree angle)
32,000 lbs / 4 tires per
Weight of base = dy = 0.97 psi (12" road base @ 140 lbs/
rear axle = 8000 lbs per tire
cf )
=(WLxFd /A)+dy
100sgin=contact area (10"x101
ova
ova = (8000 lbs x 1.2 / 256 sgin), + 0.97 lbs.
8000 Ibs / 100 sq inches = 80 psi
ova= 38.5 psi load results at top of RS3 Chamber
38.5 psi (256 kPa) on Rainstore3 Chamber with
80 psi (552 kPa) Static at Top
H-20/HS-20 Loads
of Cover
E47.8 psi (330 kPa with HS-25 Loads]
Rainstore3 has been independently field and laboratory tested to INVISIBLE
meet H-20 Bridge Loading.
S T R U G T U R E S`
Lab tests determine average Rainstore3 load capacity to be 93 psi at
2x safety factor. www.invisiblestructures.com
Grasspave2, Gravelpave2, and Slopetame2 can withstand 15,940 psi 303-233-8383
with fill material (109,906 kPa) or 2.3 mil lbs/sq ft.
H-25 Loading
_(7MF"MW77
10,000 lbs 40,000 Ibs
HS-25 Loading
10,000 lbs 40,000 Has 40,000 lbs
GRASSPAVE2 ILLI
BY INVISIBLE STRUCTURES'
100% Grass Covered Porous Pavement
CD
CD
0
r�
0
Grasspave2 Flexible Plastice Porous Pavement • Maximum porosity
• 1,ow to zero runoff
Grasspave2 protects and en- • Free air/water movement
hances the environment in three • Permits more trees
ways: First, made from 100% • Cooler site
recycled plastic, Grasspave2 ; • Greater oxygen
keeps common consumer and in- • Removes air pollutants
m dustrial products frogoing into • Can preserve existing trees
landfills. Second, grass paving ° • Helps to meet "Green Coverage Codes"
(n
Cn
directly improves the environ- • Fast, low cost installation
Z
Z
(n
ment by recharging water tables :°. 2 • Competes in cost with asphalt paving
W
W
Z
on site (reducing flooding hazards • No gutter and rain system needed
>
O
downstream), reducing sources • No added land required for detention
:5
:5of
(n
oils and solvents from asphalt, facilities
O
O
absorbing carbon dioxide, and • Lower life cycle costs
O
O
creating oxygen. Third, it en-
arasa, ed {thin) Applications
hances the beauty and quality of rsodd,dilNln)
the built environment - replacing oQod&S sana Rn
Grasspave2 -I In, 2.5 cln
°%Rm
U
U
hot asphalt paved areas with cool, HYe 09rowChurch/employee parking
sparking green lawn -like ° sand and9-.1 •Overflow and event parking
base wure..OWo121n . Golf cart aths
Product DescriptionP
�I�I=1��� subgrede
'HI ,1 I I�IJ1=Compacted
IIII-1111- -1111- .Residential driveways
Grasspave2 has thin -walled • Firelanes
independent plastic rings con-
nected by an interlocking geogrid structure, which, because it is Specifications
installed below the surface, is invisible in the completed project.
While the rings are rigid, the grid itself is flexible, which makes Unit Size - 20"x 20"x 1" (50 x 50 x 2.5cm)
N
O
it easy to install on uneven grades, and reduces usual cut and fill Unit Weight - 18oz (5 10 grams)
Z
requirements. Strength - 15,940 psi (109,906 kPa)
Connector Pull Apart Strength (Tensile) - 458 lbf/in
The rings transfer loads from the surface to the grid structure and Color - Black
engineered base course material below, thus preventing compac- Resin - 100% recycled HDPE with 3%" carbon black
tion of the upper root zone of the grass. A single ring supports Shipped in Rolls (431 sq ft standard, other roll sizes available)
IQ\NE
small loads, such as shoes, several rings support tires and large 92% Void Space (8% plastic by volume)
loads.
Invisible Structures, Inc.
REALTY CORPORATION
The rings also act to contain the root zone medium (sand) and 303-233-8383
prevent lateral migration away from tires, feet, or other loads, www.invisiblestructures.com INVISIBLE
This protects the grass root system, enabling roots to grow deep US Patent #5,250,340 S T R U C T U R E S"
into the porous base course. The result is healthy, green turf at
the surface.
One person can easily install the Grasspave2 rolls at a rate of
Merge Capita
70m2 (750 ft2) per hour, plus time for base course preparation
and grass installation (seeding, sod or sprigging). Step-by-step
instructions are included in our Installation Instructions, which w
accompany each order. (� M
Features and Benefits
Kimley)))Horn
• Allows 100% grass coverage instead of asphalt
• Made from 100% post consumer plastic
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
• High strength to weight load -bearing capacity
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
• Supports vehicular and pedestrian traffic
RALEIGH, NC 27601
PHONE: [phone]
WWW.KlmLEY-HORN.COM
#F-0102
Material Safety Data Sheet
Grasspave2 Grass Reinforcement System
JDAVIS>
Effective Date 15 May 1993
Invisible Structures, Inc.
3510 Himalaya Rd, Ste 200
Aurora, CO 80011
Emergency Phone: [phone]
Product Identification: Product Grasspave2
Description: Solid plastic resin 20"x20"x1"high Injection molded grid integral with raised rings.
Product Materials: HDPE (high density polyethylene) plastic resin, primarily from post -consumer and N�
post-industrial recycled sources. May contain small percentages of other resins
such as polypropylene, low density PE, or polyester.
Health Hazard: Not Hazardous - per OSHA HCS 29-CFR-1910.1200.
z :5 :5 m
Fire Hazard: Treat as solid which will burn. Dense smoke emitted when burned without 3:O O O
sufficient oxygen, which may emit carbon dioxide or other organics. Wear O N O O
LLJpositive pressure, SCBA in any closed space. D N O
N
Extinguish Media - Water fog, foam, alcohol foam, CO2, dry chemical. 0 � \ U m >_
Flash point & Flammable Limits - Not Applicable. Q F-- Q m
N C� m C�
\
Spills or Leaks: Not Applicable. Q = Z w
S O � 0U
Storage Instructions: Plastic materials used have been modified with Ultraviolet light inhibitors to resist O U w � =
degradation. Normal storage outdoors for periods of up to 4 weeks should not vn o o U
cause any damage to the product. If longer storage is required, cover the product
with a tarp which will protect the product from sunlight.
Waste Disposal: Recycling of this material is encouraged. Landfill disposal of waste product may
be made in accordance with local government regulations. This product should
be considered non -biodegradable. /r
Disclaimer: The information contained herein is believed to be accurate. However, it is provided solely for customer \�
consideration, investigation and verification. Invisible Structures, Inc. hereby specifically disclaims any and all
warranties - expressed or implied, regarding the accuracy and completeness of such information, and makes no
representation with respect thereto. w
V /
WJ
Irrlr I D
0
Q w
Z
0.r'
W
IIIIIIIIIIII IJ
Q
U
Z
N
O
iIL
U/
O
J
W
U)
Q
LLJ
Q
La
w
W
U=�Z
W
J
Q
nQ
0
SHEET NUMBER
C0.1

J
Q
z
Q
0
Q
U
Li
lL
Q
0_
N
O
cn
_C
U)
2
a
U
N
O
O
0
i
Ld
0
J
Q
,.
I:
00
N
O
N
J
Q
z
Q
Q
u
LL
LL
Q
N
O
U
0
J
E
i
c�
m
0
v
m
v
m
m
N
N
LLJ
6
O
0
Q
C
O
Q
Q
C
O
I
T
N
E
Y
O
T
(n
U)
U
Z
W
z
LLJ
cn
z
o
J
Li
N?
1E�
O
O
w
.
S MCDOWELL
ST.
S SAUNDERS
ST.
NB
D
� L
U)
0
— w
w0
c
`�
Q
Q
wo
0
wZ
Q
N
O
z
a
0
S DAWSON
ST.
U) Z
90
50'
E
—♦
—,
w
CD
=
3Y
REALTY CORPORATION
Q
w
�/0
°
RESERVE
AT LEAST
320 SQUARE FEET OF
SPACE
z
o
ON —SITE
FOR BIKE
SHARE INFRASTRUCTURE
z
Merge ergeCapital
6
I
I
g
JJ
c
o
:°
I
I
I
I
Q z
�
U
ZD
Q
Kimley)))Horn
I
I
0
0
Q
w ~
No 3
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
cn
o w
� m
RALEIGH, -6 2760120
PHONE: [phone]
RESTRIPE EXISTING
PEDESTRIAN
CROSSWALK
I
SI
TE
I
w
Q
a J
WWWKI#F 0102RN.COM
0
ON SOUTHBOUND
APPROACH TO
CONSIST
OF HI —VISIBILITY
I
I
o
_j
w=
MARKINGS AND UPGRADE
CURB
RAMPS
z �
< �'
w
~N
Q)
oN
Q
z l
O
oZ
JDAVIS>
E
DV)
I
I
LLJ
0
I �-�--�
�-�--�
I
Z w
ic
J (/
o g
c
°
J
V)
I
C/�
I
0
0 0
U
w
o N
w Q
g�
o
0
Q
0
N Q
g�oP
E
Of
LLI
`—'=150'(RESTRIPE)100' �
N o
co
31:
LLJ
NJ
Of
a
`
•
��
O X
U
W N
—3:
N
O
N
O
=
U
U
O
O
6
Wm
N
m
o
m
m
o
Q
200'
Z
�O
= 0
1
—
z
z
w
)
�a
C)wc
�
=
U_
U
/ /1
QQ
Z
3
Q
Q
o
= J
Q
QQ
U Z
ozQ
wo
wQ
U
Q
a
Q
= U
Q
N
=Of
W =
./
z~
-
v
Uwe
J
uJ
N
0
T
o
O
LdLL
4y*
3
Q)
a
Q
�
J
Q
V) F-
wZ
Q
w
w
0
o=
N
i
D
J
LEGEND
Z
``
~
O
0
Ld
w
O
N
F- w
°
`0
EXISTING LANE
ZC)
Q
Q
00
z
J = U EXISTING STOP SIGN
wD
U)o
O
EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL
~�
3
TI
1
Ld
W
Lv Z
0
Q
RECOMMENDED
LANE
�w
w
tU
o�
0 J
°
co
RECOMMENDED
STOP
SIGN
~w
U) ° Q
zO
W N
0 W
�i
XX
STORAGE LENGTH
Dm
Q
~ Q
0
0-
w W
U=
Y
_ �-
O
O
Q
F_
w
n/ J
I..L Q
LL_
O
o
U
E
SHEET NUMBER
O
co
0.2
I

° U U
c I
\
u
°
Q
a
c
°
L Is,
o
T �\
E
\
Y \
\ I\
o
EX. ASPHALT TO BE RIM_
SMH
Q SAWCUT AND TYARD INLET IN,
\\ INV IN5254.33' 8" CLAY STUB (N)cy / y�
REMOVED (TYP.) INV IN: 261.52' 15" RCP (N) \ INV IN=254.63' 6" CLAY (SW) / 4
o ""' " 261.23' 15" RCP (SW) \ INV OUT=254.28' 8" CLAY (S) /
261.20' 18" RCP (E) \
z EX. STORM EX. POWER POLE TO EX. POWER POLE TO CURB INLET
Q ° DRAINAGE TO BE BE REMOVED (TYP.) BE REMOVED (TYP.) TOP=257.97'\
° ABANDONED IN EX. POWER POLE EX. LIGHT POLE INV Irv=z55.87' 15" RCP (S) EX. POWER POLE /� �eH�
TO BE REMOVED INV IN=255.12' 18" RCP (W) TO BE RELOCATED / j EX. POWER POLE TO 10.0' w x a.o' H TRIPLE
z o PLACE TYP.) TO BE REMOVED - \ EX. TRAFFIC SIGNAL BE RELOCATED BARREL CULVERT
INV OUT=254.98' 24" RCP (E) /
o ° (TYP.) (TYP) (CONTRACTOR TO / /
m
\
\
LLJ
�
O
r7
O
I-
­­
z
w
z
w
cn
z
O
O
U
O
U
Li
U
U
J
.o IN o ��� �'�� SMH COORDINATE WITH / / \ POLE TO REMAIN. (CONTRACTOR TO INV=243.96' O
o N EX. POWER POLE RIM=260.37' - \ \ CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH N z
EX. BUILDING TO CURB INLET INV IN=251.79' 8" CLAY (N) UTILITY PROVIDER) / / \ PROTECT IN PLACE Q TO BE REMOVED PLR CIS) TOP=2so.3s'' UTILITY PROVIDER
Ld TION Box BE DEMOLISHED CURB INL INV OUT=251.70' 8" CLAY (E) -(TYP.) \ / \ / / \ TYP. ) DEMOLITION NOTES
w a 1 V OUT=257.81' 15" RCP (N) ) ( )
L (TYP.) (TYP.) roP=266 5' \/ / \ .(TYP.)- - - -
O I V OUT 260.9 yA� y
_ � iS O'' P-- ---OHP --- ��� -OHP
Q o - � �OHP - `� -oHP - - - - -- -OHP - -OHP -oHP_ _ _ - - - - -OHP - - - - - - T \ / /, 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF RALEIGH TO OBTAIN ALL
_ _ _ EX. SIDEWALK TO BE \
< _ - - EX. ASPHALT \ r„ REMOVED (TYP.) EX. CB TO BE \ ' , ' NECESSARY DEMOLITION PERMITS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION WORK.
S SAUNDERS STREE TO BE REMOVED METAL CONVERTED TO JB
Z (D \ VER AL SIGN � �p SIGN Post EX. PROPERTY / �` PosslP__ NcYIo ox 2. SAW CUT AND REMOVE CONCRETE CURB TO LIMITS REQUIRED FOR NEW WORK.
O / (TYP.) 0- N ONCRETE � ( ) \ (PER GIs) (TYP.) -��
IQ\Nl
16" CIP WATER LINE PRIMARY STREET) \ _ W No SIG LINE TYP. \ -\ EX. CURB & REALTY CORPORATIO
o Y _ - - uRe INLET
\ \ GUTTER TO BE - _ _ - 3. REMOVE VEGETATION AND GRASS IN AREAS TO RECEIVE NEW ASPHALT AND
Z T - �/(VARIA E WI H PUBLIC F IV) 6" CIP TER LIN I / \ / 16" CIP WATR' LINE / �0 pOP=257.6
o I "� ti / g D� `L ��,� �� �,� ,°� a INV IN=2 Sss 1s R°P (S)�^ REMOVED (TYP.) -� - / CONCRETE PAVEMENTS.
^ - - - - 6 _' - N _5 -4 IN IN� .75' 24"
zi_ �- / /1P I UT=250.10' 3s" RCP - - �� 25� �� 4. SAW CUT AND REMOVE ALL ASPHALT PAVEMENT TO LIMITS INDICATED ON PLAN.
z / _ 1 I / \ - - -- Q• pp rr�� }ram
/ / _ / S 32'07Rwr- _5. DEMOLITION MATERIALS SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE PER STATE
X ° ® .10% - i N / ✓ / REGULATIONS.
w Z OR EL 9.50 C / „� ✓ _ - -
0 0 / 20. / eLocK ,-sr qr euILDwG /ZfYc,` 5 / I r ;1'q \, 6. ALL PRIMARY UTILITIES DISCOVERED DURING DEMOLITION OPERATIONS THAT SERVE
AREA: 4 SF. r; / \•�` /
/ "
1 ( ACTIVITIES OTHER THAN THE PROJECT SITE SHALL BE PROPERLY PRESERVED AND
(� C J) \ 11( FFE: s.1,• L O I I / / / I E E
I -x / \ ' I v 242�23' PROTECTED. Kimley*Horn
w �' � I � rn / ��\ INV=2'42
/ - I I (I PIN# 17034427 \� STO / cs SMITH LLc / I�� / I (/ fI II 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER AND ENGINEER ANY
CONCRETE w FAME, • \\� 0 PIN 1703453051 J I
n } Cs- MITH LLc RACE n I I' I V DB 16758, PG 276 "�0 L DRAIN G / DB 11428, PG 486 c� I / / / / ll/ / I ///f INV=241.97' UNFORESEEN OR ADVERSE CONDITIONS, INCLUDING UNCHARTED UTILITIES, © 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
PIN 1703442339 5F. s LL� I (1001 S SAUNDERS ST) / AB D9NED I OIL TANK / �/ / / / DISCOVERED DURING DEMOLITION OPERATIONS. 421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
° \ # 1 I , II'\ 8,356 SQ. FT. O \ J GRAVEL 49,985 SQ. FT. \' / EX. BUILDING TO / / /Y
� L � DB 17330, PG 1278 23. I I / / I GRAV / � � RALEIGH, NC 27601
1 \ OD 0.19 AC. - (T \ J 1.15 AC. BE DEMOLISHED / / / // / / / SFHA 8. SUBSURFACE FEATURES ARE SHOWN IN APPROXIMATE LOCATION. CONTRACTOR IS PHONE: [phone]
/ ( U21 B S SAUNDERS STREET) J, \ I1 \ - \'• 3- / / o \ EXJCONCRETE TO BE ' TYP. / // / / / 1 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
r \ \ o / / (TYP.) / /J✓/ /// / I \FLOODWAY LINE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBSURFACE UTILITY EXPLORATION TO DETERMINE UTILITY 6,454 s EX. ASPHALT / / EX. BUILDING TO a! / \ l , '� / / I #F-0102
o.1s TO BE REMOVED \ ) // / / °�� BE DEMOLISHED mow, / \�% REMOVED/(TYP.) ,' //1 // / / ///� 1 LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS.
TYP. EX. OIL TANK ./ �`y / I I
0 3dau," //` oyA ( ) �� y \ \ _ - 1 /// / / 6pZL� / (TYP.) m�\\ �,� / (TYP.) / `f ���1�� ��\\, //// ( �- I ' 9. EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE CONNECTION CANNOT BE DISCONNECTED UNTIL NEW
v - �7• \ CS SMITH LLC . /// / :S `� / / J` /1
v # �' s LeoLLARD / RElvl TREES BE \ \ / j y ✓ / / \ I o STORM DRAINAGE IS IN PLACE.
PIN 1703442683 I / / O 7 N ✓✓�
cs SMITH LLc - // jl�'Y E ) / / \ \ (� // / / //// r # DB 17288, PG 1so1 0 SMH // / // � / / , v 10. EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION CANNOT BE DISCONNECTED UNTIL NEW
j PIN 1703PG 127 \ } EX. BUILDING TO / \ (1015 S SAUNDERS ST ` / a , /
DB 17330, PG 1278 \�\ \ 21,612 SQ. FT. //� ✓`7 / RIM=25�.96' < �\� ��/ �/ / '-1 SANITARY SEWER IS IN PLACE.
H>(1oz1 s SAUNDERS sT)�^ \ JDAVIS>
BE DEMOLISHED _ / I Y J
6 \\ \ 0.50 AC. ////� / l 1 V IN=25 .44' 8" CLAY/(NW)
>o / (`
o \ P (TYP.) - 6' G IN� OUT=24
0.06' 8" CLA (NE) 2n / �!
D a 4,894 sQ. FT. J \\�� _ / / // �.'9� / o, I / ROW TO BE / / e /�/ /
PARI���R / c
PIN# 170344341z ` � / N ,per EX. SS R TO EX. STORM \ /
�. DB 16872, PG 1643 / / / % \ ABANDONED TYP. BE REMOVED �\ / /
\ \ �' // L .o (TYP.) / DRAINAGE TO BE
> + \ 1019 S SAUNDERS ST / \ �I -1 \ a / /
S• \( )� / \ ° / / �w \ / / \ / / / (TYP.) REMOVED (TYP.) - / / // %�//�
o Y \ +2s•S / ��� 5,504 SQ. FT. / / \ I \ ErnL� �� 61. \ _ i / A /� ✓ " `( it / / \
° yFo \ 0.13 Ac. / \ \ / \ LLA&K/ /�// . 1, 2 FENCE TO BE \ / //
Q ° LLc 1 / ° \ \\ / �o°' i / / \ s// // /� / - / I m CURI
° ,08 \\ �� \\ \ e \ \ / \\ GRA/xEL / j�//// - EX. CONCRETE TO BE , 60' REMOVED,,(TYF `56 _( / /// / / = SIGN / TOP:
.o_ 1643 / \\ \ \ \ / / \\ / LEAN 0 - / /// •cP REMOVED (TYP.) FENCE�ip Ts EX. S ORM DRAINAGE TO �• '\ //�// / / / / %�/- o INV
/ / \ \ \ \\ UILDi aoLLA� j / - L \-255 42" CMP
2S ST) I \ \ \ \ \ / / i N� /
o L \ \ \\ Q \ \ // TREES TO BE\ / AREA a sF. / /// \ _ .25 MAIN. CONTRACTOR \ N INV-2
rn r. wti/EMOVED TYP. \ / / HEits.o .� /// / / \ T PROTECT IN PLACE 1 / - ,�ice x
aL a J I \ \ PARIS FAMILY PARTNER. (TYP.) / \ i / / _ �' �� / _\ % / �j/jj//� WOOD POS / �I
U 0 ✓� \' R \ ` ' ✓ \ DB 16872,,3PG41643 \ \ $ / -253- / /�/ j // }
o 'N' # \ \ // / \/ /� l J
/ / / I 9 s, * �- \- ^ (1019 MOUNT HOPE DRIVE) - / / / / / �� / // / / ////// / 500-YEAR \ /
E \ \ �- - - - / / �- // I \ FLOOD ELEVATION
� •- / ✓ 17,228 SQ. FT. / / / / / / / k FEMA FLOODWAY / _ _ / / \ / / /
o a r / PARIS FAMILY /0.40 AC. / -�' -✓ o�' L�-/
\ PARTNERSHIP LLC / \ / / - I / / 2 - - - \ . / J / // /
- -` / (TYP ) / - /// / v\ ^ ✓ / �\ ` 100-YEAR FLOOD
# 7 _ r �_ / J \ / // ELEVATION
/� _ \ I _ _ / S8_ \ / y / / /i / 251- // / / /
° \'I PIN 1703443344 I \ \ /A / - \\ - - / ////
N o \ 4 DB 16872, PG 1662 1 988, I \\ \\ / - �-�///�����
029 S SAUNDERS ST L `/ /� - �/ / / j/ ✓-�� \\ \ - �" • ` /
o ) ' \ PROPERTY LINE TO / ` -- / \ / / - // /
/ /�/� i/ / /// /
O u� \ '\ �` �- / -YEA
\ \ 5,214 SO. FT. / _ L -�\ �\ ABANDONED �T� / /// // 1` / 1A
- - /_ � /� / /moo �,F�� _ / rn
\ \� / 500CIV
EAR
O o \ \ \ I �- / \ \ \ 26 ,\ / / / - _ h ✓ ` CS SMITH LLC
//// mac, /� , �S PIN# 1703444797 i / // / r.��/ _ ✓/ - -
\ \\ VL / '� \ \ \ 96$\\ / / �' % DB 16758, PG 2767Ld
/ ` - // /i/�i / // -
O �\ e 24,293 SQ. FT.
JI 1\ \ \ \ I 1 ( / /-`09\\\///l �l I ROW TO BE 2.8s Ac./�,/ /_ _ j//i% /� ' `�
\ \, / // /\ 2� S-
/ � -\ ABANDONED (TYP.) �/ /�/ // // �� � �I� �1. /
36" FES /
+ INV=242.88'/
I
\ \ I \ PARIS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP ILL \ / I ' / % / /� FLOODWA� �/ 67 // SMH
\ \ \ / �'' �` /// /�/ LINE f _ / ✓/ RIM=251.12'
PIN# 1703444451 \\ _ // / rod I /_ ✓ / _ �� / / /
\ \ DB 16872, PG 1662 \\\ / //� ✓ - `� I ✓ ✓T //� , / // //% / / / X�L+/ INV IN: 24.80 " DIP E)
/ / , / / �� / / / / INV IN:246.80 6" DIP (E) I
� 0 \ \ \\ / (1027 S SAUNDERS \ \\\\ ` n
\\ \ \ / / �\\\ \ \ �� / �// `C�J��,k _\\ \\2$6_ // // %�' //// J�OP OF BANK%�/� j/// / /// / INV OUT=246.57 8" DIP (s)
13,008 S0. F \ ✓OH
\ \ \ ( 0.30 A \ ! ��/ / / FENCE TO BE \ / / / % / // _ (TYP.) / / RIM=255.42
/ / \ Q / / / �% / �� // / INV IN=248.92' 4" PVC (w) \
/ c, \S / REMOVED TYP. / / NV _
PIN# 1703444351 �'� l / ( ) / / / , 11/I / J �� / - / / / // / >j INV OUT 247.878"BCLAY (E
/ " 25j-
J PARIS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLC / \✓ e ;� �i \ k/ / / //// 24OG ✓ / \ J
� - DB 16872, PG 1643 / / j� /� / � � \ � � / / / � }/ //� / � / - _ / / / / / / �// / � / DIP
° / (1025 S SAUNDERS ST) / �/ \ \ / \ 50' STREAM /i / j // /// \ ,oYEA}2 FLOo / - ^/ / / / // / / ✓ //
250•71 / BUFFER (TYP.)
6,467 SQ. FT. // / / _ ✓ } //// / // 100-YEAR
/ / / pi ]� /H/OMELESS /
0.38 AC. �/ // / // / I / cAMP S / //
C FM
L/EVkT� �1
° / �/ / ///// /// 4 J/ / 25 �/ (1 / \ / X/J/ FLOODWAY LINE N rn o
cn 2� I S ` // / SFHA o A
//�- / 1, / / - ////// / \ \ / / / y 2" CPP
18" CPP INV=246.51' �� z
� \ / / / / INV=246.08' _--
0 �,� 100-YEAR FLOOD o� �
a / / ////%/� // / / o J // I / / / ��/� ✓j - ELEVATION
-- / / / \���/i �f 18" CPP k/ RMH251.40'
/> INV -243.5 '
m///✓i / //1.1� s� YYo/ / S�IH ' / y /// /� //// / / % / / /_
0 - / INV OUT 424 08 8" DIP
() )
���,P //RIM-251.37 - /
Z / / / / j / // \ _/ / - ���yaa 4A. (W) / / / /',',,o'
-• � / / / / // ✓ / / INV IN=2 97' 6" CLAY /
Q / %// /// // e Dc� / �� / / INV IN=2 92 6" CLAYI(SW)
7 / _-
o 500-YEAR
/�� / INV IN=2 2.9T 6" CLAY�IJ) \ / \ \.`?244
18" CPP FLOOD ELEVATION /
Z ? /6j + f - INV OUT= 42.92 6" CLAVSE) / / j� // / D� / 4 \ / / l i
//// /// /� 5✓; S L S // �a / / \ \ / / / // /�/ d/ - 3\\\ / 1 i INV=244.38' / /�
/ /L'q41 t4 / / l PF�OPERTY LINE=\ TO \ / �� / 2 ✓ J > a / 20,
/�� /
' t / eF� da • �6f / / Y \ Cs SMITH ILL �Y �. "O /// /�j / rD
O a / ��� ti - ^ `�i j /2/ / / l� I l PIN# 170344654I ABANDONED �YP.) / s %// / '� / �245-
( / S��,�>�
�9 DB 16758, PG 2773 / / `S" / / /� / �� -{ / NRP GATEWAY PARK LP
LLJ
o \ ✓ PIN 1703448901
0� r�\ / / �/ \ \ \ \ 39,806 sQ. Fr. S3\ `/ / / / sFHA / � EX. PROPERTY / / /o DB 0898, PG 818
0.91 AC. \ \ / // o / FLOOD LINE i LINE TYP. o
\ / \ / / ( ) / / A BM 2002, PG 1698
Q a \\\\ I \ / \ \ \ \ / / / / / / / /�/ )
° \ \\ \\\ \ / \ \ \ \ �2 / / //j�//� / / / // / / SMH (ABANDONED)
RIM=249.42' /
' \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ / // / INV IN=245.57' 8" DIP (N) r /
Z \ \ \\\\ \ \ I 100-YEAR'\ \ / / / // / /�y INV OUT=2145.67 8" DIP NE ° I
\\\\\ \ ` \ ELEVATION \ \ \ \ \ �- /��/ ( )
Q o \�� \ \ \� \\ 500-YEAR \ \ \ 2$1 /
\\\ \\\ \ FLOOD ELEVATION///
�\ \\\ \ \�sr
O ° \\\\� EX. PROPERTY \
:\ LINE TYP. \\\ \ \ \ \ 2 / / / SMH /
Z \\\\\\\�\ \ \ \� \\\�\\ \ \ \ \ \ 5(8 ✓ _ !/g / / RESERVED FOR RIM=251.16' /
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / GREEN WAY EASEMEN /
\\ 25(� / / INV IN=241.96' 8" DIP (NW)
n\\\\ \\ \ \\ \ �\ S 2 �- / I BM 2002, PG 16 8) INV OUT=241.85 8" DIP (SE)
X \� \\\\ \� \\\ \ \ \ 1 ,• 4s. /LLI
///� N
XC
\\
D
0 as
a S H \\_ \\ \\\ \ \ \ o �/
\\\\ -RIM=248.77'
/ �\\INV IN=(FULL OF WATER) \\ \\ / / / \ 1 FLOODWAY LINE 1 l
_ ° / \ INV OUT=(FULL OF WATER)\\�\� \ ° /
TOP OF WATER:242.77' \ \\\ a
00 K1 BOTTOM OF BOX:240.27' \\ \\ \� / ✓ �� l /
GO 0
o \ \ \ \ F 100-YEAR FLOOD
ELEVATION /
\ \ 500 YEAR ( /
n / I ♦ \ \\ \ \�\\ \ M� FLOOD ELEVATION -�
3 \ \
E / \ \\� 8.0' Wx8.0'H
PEDESTRIAN TUNNEL
o �y // ♦ / \
♦ / \ GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
/ / I / �\ / 0 20 40 80
D
// I
0 a / / ♦ / �� \ X / I \ \ \
o�
LEGEND
O
BOUNDARY MONUMENT FOUND
Co
O
BOUNDARY MONUMENT SET
O SAN SEWER CLEANOUT
�
CALCULATED POINT
S SAN SEWER MANHOLE
■
CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND
❑E ELECTRIC BOX
©
GAS METER
GV
N
GAS VALVE
DECIDUOUS TREE
O
LP TANK
CONIFEROUS TREE
0
BOLLARD
SHRUB
CATV
CABLE BOX
<�H
FIRE HYDRANT
RIP
RAP ❑ CONCRETE
WV
H
WATER VALVE
®
WATER METER
®
MONITORING WELL
ID
TELEPHONE BOX
Q
TELEPHONE MANHOLE
®
HVAC UNIT
E3
FIBER OPTIC MARKER
cQ,
UTILITY POLE
GUY WIRE
>Yc
LIGHT POLE
MAILBOX
-o-
SIGN
SURVEY CONTROL POINT
®
STORM INLETS
®
FLARED END SECTION
STORM DRAIN LINE
OHP
OVERHEAD POWER LINE
FW
FEMA FLOODWAY LINE
FEMA 100 YR FLOODPLAIN LINE
-
- FEMA 500 YR FLOODPLAIN LINE
CREEK LINE
TR
TRAFFIC SIGNAL LINE
SS
SANITARY SEWER LINE
X
FENCELINE
GUARDRAIL
WOODLINE
3:
U
U
O
NO
w N
O
=
O O
LLJ c\
�\
�_
N
Q
m
0
0
Q
O
\
w
Z
Z
Y
Y
O
Q
cn
Q
w
V)
0
0
0
p
Z
J
Q
(D
Z
z
Z
�
O
O
�
X
w
-
J
0
z
O
w
U
p
U
z
Z
D
0<
LL
LIJ
U)
0
w
0�
<
w
LLLI
Z
Q
CD
J
Q
LL-
0
O
n
c�
SHEET NUMBER
cl .0

U
o NOTE:
.-
° 1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN
Q U.S. SURVEY FEET. (UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED)
0 2. ALL BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE
E PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 1983/2011).
0
= 3. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
T
E
0
.J'
0
0
3
°
0
°
0
°
U)
o BUILDING OR WALL
as°
min min 36"
o � PEDESTRIAN CLEARANCE
min 72"
SIDEWALK
4s" Y
min o
TREE GRATE 96 min 36" Y
Lu
Mmin m T
BIKE RACK BIK� min 48"
min 36"
Q 12.5' FUTURE
ROADWAY
0 C/L TO BOC-
= STOP SIGN
(TYP.)
E 36.5' C/L TO
Y PROPOSED ROW
>1 15' X 3 4 0'
SIGHT TRIANGLE STOP BAR
° 15' X 340' (TYP.)
° SIGHT TRIANGL
Q --
TIE INTO EX. CURB
0 & GUTTER (TYP.) S SAUNDERS TREET
o (PRIMARY STREE ) —
�yARIABLE WIDTH PUBLI R/W)
N
— —
o —
_ __ -------
(n
-- 62.10'
VEL
3 L 79.50'1 _ S 10'49'57" W —
--- r
Q o 3e 'N CONCRETE
\ SIDEWALK
(TYP.)
�o-A � PROPOSED ROW
y wi TETE
w n FRAME DEDICATION
E } a CS SMITH LLC RAGE F \
O \ PIN# 1703442339 SF. \ �,y CS SMITH LLC
0 IDS 17330, PG 1278 23. Ry, PIN# 1703442592 \ I
N -0 Q3 DB 17288, PG 1501
(� \ 021 B S SAUNDERS STREET)
/ (1017 S SAUNDERS ST) \
} / 6,454 SQ. FT. 15,096 SO. FT.
o Z
� \ \ 0.15 A\\/ tigg98 0.35 AC. 5' AWNING
v, s
/off gss9 23 tiw 3goa, (TYP.)
� cs SMITH LLC �Y a DOOR TYP.
PIN# 1703442374 POD A
N DB 17330, PG 1278
a (1021 S SAUNDERS ST) \ )- BOUNDARY
a o * PARIS FAMILY 3 ' CURB &
a 4,894 SQ. FT. PARTNERSHIP LLC
U E \ 0.11 AC. / PIN# 1703443412 / GUTTERN(TYP.)
DID 16872, PG 1643 \
�s �} (1019 S SAUNDERS ST) A, R7 Jr
/ PIS FAMILY s)y� U�� 5,504 SQ. FT. OA�� POD A S.0'
0 NERSHIP LLC A� .0� 0.13 AC. ar,• BOUNDARY
O 0 17034432081,
872, PG 1643
Q 0 SAUNDERS ST) O�\
ti'°
06 SQ. FT. a w PARIS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLC /
o 011 AC. PROPOSED PROPERTY
� g S•
a 9eSRo1F LINE (TYP.)-
/ Q /,—o DQ. F I.
� PARIS FAMILY 0.40 ACcn
. /
o� PARTNERSHIP LLC PUBLIC ACCESS
b 6 PIN# 1703443344
3 �o DB 16872, PG 1662 AND CORPUD O•\
�• ` �'�s "\�(1029 S SAUNDERS ST) UTILITY EASMENT
/y 5,214 SFT.
3 A / O
� \- 0.12 AC.
N IILY J� 7411
/ e
0 .0 - LLc\" CORPUD UTILITY T 20.0e r4.O'
3 1643EASEMENT
)ERS ST) ) PARIS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLO 0PIN# 17034444 60 DB 16872, PG 1662/FT.> D- (1027 S SAUNDERS S
LLJC) 30' CORPUD SS_ 30.0'o Q / \ 13,008 s EASEMENT �! w 0.30
. /tip X.
(D /q .c„�i PIN# 1703444351 0� PROPOSED BIKE
/ 0- ,� $ g0 PARIS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLC �RACK (TYP.)
DB 16872, PG 1643
° (1025 S SAUNDERS ST)
0 16,467 SO. FT.
oT 0.38 AC. �A 20' PUBLIC DRAINAGE /
0 0\lps.
EASEMENT (TYP.) /004
Lo
Ln
O AiP.
° 100-YEAR FLOOD / ,O• All -
ELEVATION
CONCRIETE
��
O500-YEAR \ FLOOD ELEVATION (TYP.) y4°
0
29.76'
0lcv
`A S
0 9 ' \ • /p /
°
POD A --
BOUNDARY --/ \
_j
10' AS
ULTI-USE-PATH
(TYP.)
o °
100-YEAR FLOOD
N L \ \ ELEVATION
(-D \
o A 500-YEAR
FLOOD ELEVATION
o
10' PUBLIC ACCESS \
EASEMENT (TYP.)
_ °
� a o
s
U) oo•
CL -cE /
°
°
� U
— O \
Q) — S
� �w
Q
�-
3 so °
E
c,
L
U � `
\ v
0] Q
U
-6 O
0�
STREET
nuviv v nui-"
BOLLARDS, TYP. / / RALEIGH GREENWAY /
■ ■ ■ ■ / EASEMENT, (TYP.) /
P / s 10' GRASS
PUBLIC ACCESS / / PAVERS (TYP o� J
EASMENT / �O
/ p,
• O• / / EX. PROPERTY
/ �W';^ LINE (TYP.)
\ / 50' STREAM /
BUFFER (TYP.)
6
RESERVED FOR
/
(20,GREENWAY EASEMENT /
/ ROOF OVERHANG (BM 2002, PG 1698)
292
NO TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENCROACHMENTS (INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO CLEARING, GRADING, FENCING, AND THE
INSTALLATION OF RETAINING WALLS OR OTHER STRUCTURES)
ARE PERMITTED WITHIN THE GREENWAY EASEMENT AREA
WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH.
IN,
_OADING
ZONE \ EX. TRAFFIC SIGNAL
POLE -TO _REMAIN.
100-YEAR FLOOD ROOF OVERHANG/
�Fw ELEVATION \
500-YEAR
FLOOD ELEVATION
"OE10' ASPHALT /
MULTI -USE -PATH
i
I
I
NEW POWER POLE
(TYP.) EXACT/
4
LOCATION WILL BE/
COORDINATED WITH
PROVIDERS AT START
/ OF CONSTRUCTION
PROPOSED
CROSSWALK
i
VALLEY CURBING
AT FIRE ACCESS
TIE INTO EX. CURB
& GUTTER R (TYP.)
Ll-
v / C
��
:ESS X,00
30' CORPUD SS
X�
EASEMENT
(TYP.)
-�Fl i <
wti a POD A rn
BOUNDARY \
YEAR FLOOD
FLOOD ELEVATION \
100-YEAR FLOOD k
ELEVATION
/ SF
FLOODWAY
TANG LINE PEDESTRIANyX�x
GREENWAY
--� BRIDGE
TOP OF BANK tico
(TYP.)
100-YEAR FLOOD
ELEVATION
0-YEAR m
DOD ELEVATION / X N m o
X� SFHA
FLOOp N T
DWAY LIN N �O�
100-YEAR FLOOD ro
ELEVATION /
500- oti YEAR
/FLOOD ELEVATION
NRP GATEWAY PARK LP /
PIN# 1703448901
c BM 2002, PCC1698 /
/ 5
"J
a /
EX. CITY OF RALEIGH
ROCKY BRANCH / \
GREENWAY TRAIL
l
FLOODWAY LINE 1 l
/ 1 z
3
EX. CITY OF RALEIGH
ROCKY BRANCH
GREENWAY TRAIL
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
100-YEAR FLOOD
ELEVATION
/Y 500-YEAR
I
I
I
1
I
SITE LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
EASEMENT LINE
FENCE
STANDARD CURB AND GUTTER
O$
PARKING SPACE COUNT
SIGN (SEE PLAN)
❑-o-❑
LIGHT POLE
0
WHEEL STOP
Wl
ACCESSIBLE PARKING MARKING
(VINDICATES VAN ACCESSIBLE)
DIRECTIONAL PAVEMENT ARROWS
ACCESSIBLE RAMP
4—
DEPRESSED CURB RAMP
LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT
HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT
STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE
a • o
GRASS PAVERS
•
•
• '
ASPHALT GREENWAY
�' • •
HARDSCAPE
SITE DATA
PROPERTY INFORMATION
EXISTING ZONING:
PD
EXISTING USE:
AUTOMOTIVE, RETAIL, VACANT
GROSS SITE AREA:
6.02 AC (265,514 SF)
RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION:
0.32 AC (13,965 SF)
NET SITE AREA:
5.70 AC (248,549 SF)
BUILDING SETBACKS:
PRIMARY STREET = 0'
SIDE STREET = 0'
SIDE LOT LINE = 0'
REAR LOT LINE = 0'
PARKING SETBACKS:
PRIMARY STREET = 0'
SIDE STREET = 0'
SIDE LOT LINE = 0'
REAR LOT LINE = 0'
PROJECT DATA
PROPOSED USE:
OFFICE/INSTITUTIONAL, RETAIL, RESTAURANT, RESIDENTIAL
PIN#
1703442683, 1703442592, 1703444408, 1703444451,
1703446541, 1703442776, 1703444797, 1703453051
PROPOSED # OF BUILDINGS
1
BUILDING GROSS FLOOR AREA:
371,640 SF
PARKING:
REQUIRED:
RESTAURANT - 1 PER 500 SF
RESIDENTIAL - 1 SPACE PER DWELLING UNIT
NO PARKING REQUIRED FOR FIRST 16 DWELLING UNITS.
1*(16,800/500)+(336-16)*1 = 354 SPACES
PROVIDED:
691 SPACES
ACCESSIBLE PARKING:
REQUIRED:
14 SPACES
PROVIDED:
21 SPACES TOTAL (4 VAN ACCESSIBLE)
SHORT TERM BIKE PARKING:
REQUIRED:
OFFICE/RETAIL - 1 SPACE PER 5,000 SF, MINIMUM 4
RESIDENTIAL - 1 SPACE PER 20 UNITS, MINIMUM 4
1 *(16,800/5,000)+1 *(336/20) = 20 SPACES
PROVIDED:
20 SPACES
LONG TERM BIKE PARKING:
REQUIRED:
OFFICE/RETAIL - 1 SPACE PER 5,000 SF, MINIMUM 4
RESIDENTIAL - NONE
1*(16,800/5,000) = 4 SPACES
PROVIDED:
4 SPACES
AMENITY AREA:
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR DETAILS
REQUIRED: 248,549 SF X 10% = 24,855 SF
PROVIDED: 36,416 SF
SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA:
EXISTING (PRE-DEV.):
=58,810 SF (22.68%)
PROPOSED (POST-DEV.):
=145,054 SF (55.94%)
COMMON OPEN SPACE:
REQUIRED:
10% OF TOTAL POD AREA
248,549*10% = 24,855 SF
PROVIDED:
51,499 PRIMARY COMMON OPEN SPACE (21%)
I— ---
z z cn
LLl w z
O
O O
U U LLJ
u u
N O
KANE
REALTY CORPORATION
IlVerae CaDitall
Kimley)))Horn
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
RALEIGH, NC 27601
PHONE: [phone]
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
#F-0102
JDAVIS>I
z
U
U
m
N
3:
O
a�
cl:�
O
w N
O
=
00
N
�\
�_
N
Q
m
o
Ld
o
Q
O
\
w
z
z
LLJ
0
w
<
_
v
cn
o
0
0
w
aQ
Z J
J
W
u
z
Z
0<
LL
LLJ0
U)
w
<0-w
Z
Y
i
CD
w
J
LL-
0
0
SHEET NUMBER
C2.0

o
NOTE:
U
°
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN
Q
U.S. SURVEY FEET. (UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED)
0
2. ALL BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE
L
PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 1983/2011).
0
3. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
E
Y
O
T
0
0
0
0
0
U)
U
c
N
0
U
O
U)
Q
a
O
cy
3
0
=
�
I
�
T
N
m
E
=
X
Y
LT
z
D-'
O
a
6 S SAUNDERS ST
o _ (PRIMARY •ti i rtcr i
ARIABLE WIDTI -'I INf C
- --
m=--—--—----- —
N-—— ------- ----� - — — — — — — — oe
U o
L GRAVEL
-c �/ x
(0 O
c c t 2" METAL
6 3 _ PIPE \
/ CONCRETE
N w n FR qM\
N I
E } CS SMITH LLC RAGE \
° \ PIN# 1703442339 sE ( CS SMITH LLC
o / DB 17330, PG 1278 23. CS
1703442592 \ I e
U0 (1021 B S SAUNDERS STREET) (D� DB 17288, PG 1501 \
N (1017 S SAUNDERS ST)
�� } / 6,454 SQ. FT. �(D
\ 0.15 AC. 15,096 SQ. FT.
o
� U
C cc��LL
a CS SMITH LLC IN..I
PIN# 1703442374 \ }
DB 17330, PG 1278
°J �(1021 S SAUNDERS ST)
0 IN.I °
� / \ � PARIS FAMILY '
4,894 SO, FT.
a � PARTNERSHIP LLC
E I-,0.11 AC. / PIN# 1703443412
\
DB 16872, PG 1643 \
(1019 S SAUNDERS ST)
U o PIS FAMILY / 5,504 SQ. FT.
NERSHIP LLC 0.13 AC.
-t N 1703443208 +
U ° 872, PG 1643
(D SAUNDERS ST) 1 '
Q 0011SAC FT. / PARIS HIP LLC
PIN# 1703444408/ 7
r DB 16872, PG 1643 /
N (1019 MOUNT HOPE DRIVE)
CD a 17,228 SO. FT. w
PARIS FAMILY 0,40 AC.
p PARTNERSHIP LLC
PIN# 1703443344
CD DB 16872, PG 1662 /
(1029 S SAUNDERS ST) r ' D
C) 12 5,201SO. ACFT, A° > °
3
QI
% 4 Ly
c 1643 L —
0 ' LLC \ T
}3285
\ I I >r °
E° )ERS ST) PARIS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LL I I I I A
C) 0 PIN# 1703444451
o FT. DB 16872, PG 1662 I \I i ■
O Q (1027 S SAUNDERS
Lo Q 13,008 SQ. F
w 0.30 A I I I r
(D / PIN# 1703444351
PARIS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLC
N
O (D� DB 16872, PG 1643
N (D (1025 S SAUNDERS ST)
0 16,467 SO. FT. /
0.38 AC.
E, E
O
m ° 100-YEAR FLOOD / / �o•
ELEVATION
X
Ed .� 500-YEAR
z FLOOD ELEVATION
Y
U
H- (D
O
m
IN,
m 0
0
100-YEAR FLOOD
N C \ ELEVATION
C)
0 500-YEAR
�
r�� FLOOD ELEVATION
o
J c
0 \
� \ /
> N
0 a /
< O r
ri-
c
U) O
Q) -c �trgR� ...
N°°vvrR0 AvsT a a
FOqCRFFT
m E
U /O
Q)
-N
0
/
10'
a /
SFHA
FLOODWAY UNEol
RESERVED O GREENWAY EASEMENT
(BM 2002, PG 1698)
a �
0 o V \ //
as �
o
x ..
as �
a /
a k /
\k
IN,
I �
I
LL
\
\ I
V
686.4
118.8'
9
s D. > ° ° ° 0 D.
0 bk
0 1 a
s °
ma
■ ■ WWYQLAZA
saw
♦ / / / 1
■ ■ FLOODWA,
/ j c—
■ 20 BUILD TO LINE ♦ i // D
/
■ -- ♦ ♦ / /// // /// D
■ // // // / �� D
o
■ 'in L D \ ■ / /� J // / / o SFHA
I N
RETAIL/RESTAURANT TERRACE / / j / / / / "IFLOOUNE—
Y// } I I ill
lool
■ } \
500-YEAR
FLOOD ELEVATION /
■ / / / `� <
100-YEAR FLOOD
ELEVATION / \
100 YEAR
ELEVATION
500-YEAR +/ /
FLOOD ELEVATION
SFHAFLOODWAY
UNE /
/ X
0-YEAR FLOOD /
EVATION
JAT10N � / /
\ SFHA o
FLOODWAY UNE /Ir N �n O � I
100-YEAR FLOOD 1 /
ELEVATION
YEAR
oti FLOOD ELLEVATION
/ y �
20,
NRP GATEWAY PARK LP /
PIN# 1703448901
DB 10898, PG 818
BM 2002, PG 1698
/
a
Y
rn�
J r
l �
VAY UNE lI l
1 z
� / 1
GRAPH C SCALE IN FEET
/ 0 2 40 80
100-YEAR FLOOD
ELEVATION
/y 500 YEAR � �
3UILD TO:
'RIMARY STREET: 0'-20'
REQUIRED: 40%
PROPOSED: 374' FRONTAGE/686' = 54.5i
3" SURFACE COURSE (S-9.5A IN 2 LIFTS)
8° AGGREGRATE BASE COURSE (NCDOT CABC)
COMPACTED SUBGRADE (SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT)
REGULAR DUTY ASPHALT PAVING DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
c� c� m
m m m
N
\ LIJ
cD �
\ � o
O O
u� GO
� H—
z z cn
LLJ LLJ z
O
O O
O O LLJ
O O
KANE
REALTY CORPORATION
IMerae CaDital
Kimley*Horn
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
RALEIGH, NC 27601
PHONE: [phone]
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
#F-0102
J DAVIS �I
3:
O
O
O
N
O
LLJ N
O
O O
N
c=
�\
N
Q
m
0
LLJ
o
Q
O
\
LLJ
Z
Z
LLJ
Y
C)
Y
O
Q
U)
Q
(n
0
0
0
W
Z
�
X
�O
w
J
Z
W
0
J
W
U
z
D
0
/
C/
O
LL
LIJ
U)
0
Q
LLJ
�Qww
i
CD
w
L.L
J
Q
LL-
0
o
n
U
SHEET NUMBER
C2. 1

C
IM"
W
.0 NOTE:
0
1. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN
Q U.S. SURVEY FEET. (UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED)
° 2. ALL BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE
o PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 1983/2011).
3. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
PROPERTY LINE
EASEMENT
POD BOUNDARY
E
0
T
E
0
0
0)
a
u
�i
U
0
U
0
cn
S SAUNDERS STREET
EX. PROPERTY
(PRIMARY STREET) ROW OSED LINE (TYP.) PROPOSED PROPERTY
(VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC R/W) CORPUD SS LINE (TYP.)
EASEMENT
(TYP.)
E
Y
PROPOSED ROW
DEDICATIONsop
o \ r CS SMITH LLC LLC
/ I
a \ \ I I J I D13 167583PG 2761 / PN 8, PC08
o CS SMITH LLC DB 17428, PG 486
c / \ CS SMITH LLC L (1001 S SAUNDERS ST)
o_ i CS SMITH LLC PIN# 1703442339 I / \ / /
8,356 SA FT.
DB 17330, PG 1278 PIN# 1703442592 \ w I 49,985 SQ. FT. / / %
PIN# 1703442235 DB 17288, PG 1501 I 0.19 AC. / / \ 1.15 AC.
CS SMITH LLC (OBS1 SAUNDERS ST) (1021 B S SAUNDERS STREET) (1017 S SAUNDERS ST) \ui
PUBLIC/
o PIN# 1703442220 6,454 SO. FT.
15,096 SQ. FT. ACCESS / \ /// /�/ // ��' / // / /
DB 18091, PG 1831 \ 0.15 AC. EASEMENT / \
o (1035 S SAUNDERS ST) 6 g0 16SAAC.FT / \ 0.35 AC. I / / // // / /
3
4,483 SA FT. CS SMITH LLC / / / / // /
83 Q. I PROPERTY LINE TO BE i / / /
m I I CS SMITH LLC / I FIN# 1703442683 / ABANDONED (TYP.)
X I \ I k101B5 1S SAUNDERS 0ST)
PIN# 1703442374 / \
LJ DB 17330, PG 1278
21,612 SQ. FT.
(1021 s SAUNDERS sr)
F- \ I 0.50 Ac.
Q PARIS FAMILY // / / I
J 3 \ 4, oi1 sAC Fr. PARTNERSHIP LLC \ / / / // // j / / / EASEMENT CORPUD POD A BOUNDARY I
PIN# 1703443412 / I / /
\ NEW LOT 1 \
\ DB 16872, PG 1643 \ / / /
N 1019 S SAUNDERS ST / I \ / \ // // / / (TYP.)
E ;T) ( ) / 248,549 S.F. / / // / / /
j 0 PARIS FAMILY 5,504 SQ. FT. I PUBLIC ACCESS / 5.70 AC I / / r'0 . �/ // / / /�
PARTNERSHIP LLC 0.13 Ac. POD A EASMENT I I / / O- / //
N PIN# 1703443208 BOUNDARY / J
DB 16872, PG 1643 , I I I--___—_—=a—�� --� / < // /
- (1023 S SAUNDERS ST) / — —
J
20' PUBLIC DRAINAGE
0 4,606 SO. FT. / I / I / / / — / / / \ EASEMENT (TYP.) / /
� -11
0 PARIS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLC
0.11 AC. / PIN# 1703444408 \ / L Z —� — — -—_—_—_—_ —— — — / _ / /
/ c DB 16872, PG 1643 // /
(1019 MOUNT HOPE DRIVE) / \ I / / / j_ — — — / \ \ / I
/ 17,228 SQ. FT. PUBLIC DRAINAGE / / / / — — — — — \ \ \ /
\ PARIS FAMILY CORPUD UTILITY 0.40 AC. /
EASEMENT (TYP.)
-0 PARTNERSHIP LLC
0 0-o \ PIN# 1703443344 EASEMENT (TYP.) �� — /' \ I / / / / / \ \ / /
a DB 16872, PG 1662 / \ — — /
\ (1029 S SAUNDERS ST)
\ 5,214 SQ. FT.
a PUBLIC ACCESS / CS SMITH LLC
o / / / / PIN# 1703444797
a EASMENT / / DB 16758, PG 2767
� PARIS FAMILY L / / / a 293 SQ. FT. / / / �,
0' PARTNERSHIP LLC\ POD_ T T T / / ROW TO BE 85 AC.
0 PIN 1703443285 I
# BOUNDARY /' / ABANDONED (CITY
DB 16872, PG 1643 \
Q (1033 S SAUNDERS ST) PARIS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLC ` I I I �/ COUNCIL RESOLUTION / POD A BOUNDARY / / / / / EX. 20' CORPUD SS
/ a \ PIN# 1703444451 I I / 261 2021-/ / /
4,794 SQ. FT. DB 16872, PG 1662 N0. I I ) / / EASEMENT (TYP.)
a \ 0.11 AC. (1027 s SAUNDERS ST) 30.0' / PROPERTY LINE TO BE
0 13,008 SQ. FT. /
3 \ 0.30 AC. ABANDONED (TYP.) / / / TOP OF BANK �j //
/ (TYP.) \ I I / / / /
/ PIN# 1703444351 / /
u / PARIS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLC 3O' CORPUD SS 20.0' I / // / / / / // /
0 3 DB 16872, D 1643 EASEMENT (/TYP.
Q (1025 S SAUNDERS ST) (TYP.) o / PARIS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLC I I / / / / 75' CITY OF / /
I� 16,467 SQ. FT.
N , PIN# 1703444164 0.38 AC. \ 20' PUBLIC DRAINAGE /
o DB 16872, PG 1643 J / RALEIGH GREENWAY
o EASEMENT (TYP.) PROPERTY LINE TO BE / /
�
(1031 S SAUNDERS ST) \ / / I ABANDONED (TYP.) / / // EASEMENT, (TYP.)/ / // �m� I
c 13,407 SQ. FT.
0.31 AC. ol
w10
<w \ EX. 20' CORPUD SS /�O / / / / / p.
/ EASEMENT (TYP.)
E / �S SMITH LLC
o / P # 1 0 446541
DB 67 8, PG 2773
�/ / / EX. PROPERTY / / / / NRPIN#T1703448901 LP
/ 39, 06 Q.T�.� /
o 0 / / DB 10898, PG 818
Lo 0
\ / \ ��� / / / / LINE (TYP.) BM 2002, PG 1698 /
a \ 50' STREAM
B' F
�FFER (TYP.)qo-
.L EX. PROPERTY \ // �-/ /
W LINE (TYP.) 10' PUBLIC ACCESS \ / / / \
o EASEMENT (TYP.) / �p / � RESERVED EQR\,� /
/ GREENWAY EASEMEN ` /
(BM 2002, PG 18)
x \ Ld n
\ /
Q c
/
0
0
w/ortiq
a c°NTR�t"AV
o° 110gT�QFF I
0 a �C 4�
c J
� 6
� \
0
0
U)+� N
N �
E ` GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
L
N
U
L
U
�
M
7
U
N
0�
d:
F--
N
LJJ
cD �
\ � o
�D r7
O 0
u� cr)
z z cn
w LLJ z
o
O O >
U U W
u u
INl —lzl
IQ\Nl
REALTY CORPORATION
IMerae CaDital
Kimley*Horn
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
RALEIGH, NC 27601
PHONE: [phone]
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
#F-0102
J DAVIS �I
z
ii
ii
m
3:
O
O
O
N
O
w N
O
=
O O
N
�\
N
Q
m
0
LLJ
o
Q
= O
\
-1
o
3:
LLJ
0
Y
O
Q
Fn
Q
w
V)
o
o
0
In
x
w
Q
J
1
U
z
D
0
c^
v,
O
LL
Q
LIJ
U)
0
Q
w
Q
w
LLJ 111
Y
i
CD
w
J
LL-
O
0
^
SHEET NUMBER
C2.2

c
ui
0
U
O
Q
O
C
L
O
I
T
E
Y
O
T
p
3
0
0
U)
U
C
N
N
O
U
O
O
Q
a
p
0
0
I
T
N
Y
T
3 �
� o
__jQ
Q p
w °
� a
L
� p
w
� O
�N
�o
Z _c
Q �
U) p
O c
. 0
U 3
Q) o
p L
/E
U U
0
.0
p �
U "
I
Lo O
a 0
/ U
U p
0
a �
Q
C 0
�E
a a
/ p
� O
0
0
0
0
cy
U
L
C5 p
a 0-
I �
� 0-
N
O o
o
O .p
> 3
w L
� o
0
Q
� U
/
Y o
E 0
a �
a� Q
0
a� w
Lo U
a
O
0
O 0
N
T
0
� 0
� a
� 0
U
� m
Q .-
1­ 6
w U
>
� N
~ o
J
w �
� N
z E
Q i
O —
0 0
v
0 .�
0
p 0
z �
o
a
b
L
Q a
D_ 0
p
N �
� Q
�c
N O
_c U
U N
p _
_ 3
U
6
N �
0
a
U +'
U
E
m D
U
0
Q�
aL0
15" RCP
OUTLET PIPE
0.50% MIN
6" SOLID WALL PVC DRAIN
FROM FILTER CHAMBER. FASTEN
TO BOTTOM WITH STAINLESS
STEEL STRAPS 2.0' O.C.
20.00'
I
CONTRACTOR NOTE:
ALL SAND HIL I ERb I U BE WA I EK I IGH I . CUN I KAC I UK
TO CONTACT APPROPRIATE MANUFACTURER AND
ENSURE WATERTIGHT APPLICATION IS PROVIDED.
OVERFLOW WEIR.
SEE OVERFLOW WEIR
DETAIL THIS SHEET
-PENETRATION IN SEPARATOR
WALL FOR FLOW DISTRIBUTION
PIPING. TYPICAL EVERY 10
FEET. SEE FLOW DISTRIBUTION
PIPING DETAIL THIS SHEET
45.00'
SAND FILTER - 1
SEDIMENT AREA = 300.0 SF C7
�O
FILTER AREA = 300.0 SF
O
D
i
KEYNOTES
SEDIMENT CHAMBER AREA
FILTER CHAMBER AREA
OUTFALL STRUCTURE AREA
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 5 10 20
15" RCP
INLET PIPE
4" PERFORATED PVC
PIPING FULL LENGTH OF
FILTER CHAMBER. SEE
SECTION A THIS SHEET.
TOP= 259.00
1—INCH STORM
ELEVATION: 255.05
6" PVC INLET
FROM RD
INV: 253.50
BOTTOM OF SPUTTER BOX
INV= 253.50
15" RCP OUTLET TO SAND
FILTER INV= 253.50
ROOF SLAB
SEDIMENT
CHAMBER
" DIA. STAINLESS STEEL
CONCRETE EXPANSION
ANCHOR (TYP)
4" 90' PVC ELBOW
4" SOLID WALL —
PVC PIPING
0
14 GAUGE 4" STAINLESS
STEEL STRAP (TYP)
6" SOLID WALL PVC DRAIN
FROM FILTRATION CHAMBER
TOP= no nn
BAFFLE WALL
ELEVATION: 255.05
15" RCP OUTLET
TO MH 15" RCP
INV: 253.50 SAND FILTER IPV V. LJ J.Ju
SPUTTER BOX -41 PROFILE
FILTER
CHAMBER
(NTS)
INV= 253.50
1—INCH STORM/BAFFLE WALL
ELEVATION: 255.05
=R BOX
SAND FILTER — 1 LOCATION DETAIL
Iq
4" PERFORATED PVC PIPING
0 FULL LENGTH OF FILTER CHAMBER
" PERFORATIONS @ 6" O.C.
(4) PERFORATIONS PER ROW
air
14 GAUGE 4" STAINLESS
STEEL STRAPS @ 2' O.C.
SAND
p FILTER
MEDIA
FLOW DISTRIBUTION PIPING
NOT TO SCALE
CONTROL STRUCTURE
TYPICAL FOR SEDIMENT CHAMBER
ADJACENT TO OUTFALL
STRUCTURE
NOT TO SCALE
250.00'
REFER TO THIS SHEET
rnn ["A\In rll Trn ["Tnl InTI Inr nl\Ir\I["InAI C`
ACCESS STEPS (TYP)
4" PVC ELBOW AND TURNDOWN
SEE FLOW DISTRIBUTION PIPING
DETAIL, THIS SHEET.
SECTION A
TYPICAL FOR SEDIMENT CHAMBER
ADJACENT TO FILTER CHAMBER
NOT TO SCALE
FINISHED GRADE
PAVEMENT
AGGREGATE BASE
ACCESS STEPS (TYP)
255.26'
251.50'
250.00'
6" PERFORATED PVC UNDERDRAIN
PIPE IN SOCK. FASTEN TO WALL
WITH STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS
AT 2' ON CENTER
(INVERT TO MATCH BOTTOM OF
STRUCTURE)
(f) U7
z z cn
w w z
: O
O O
U U W
� � m
U u
REALTY CORPORATIO
IlVerae Capital
Kimley*Horn
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
RALEIGH, NC 27601
PHONE: [phone]
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
#F-0102
JDAVIS>I
U
U
O
U
N
O
D N
O
N
c=
N
Q
m
0
LLJ
0
Q
O
w
Z
Z
w
Y
Y
O
w
<
_
v
cn
0
0
0
1
U
z
0<
Wr^
�
O
LL
Q
w
0
w
0-
W
U=az=_
QCD
Lv
O
0
n
U
SHEET
NUMBER
Cl
0.0

U
0HP ----
S. SAUNDERS STREET
I PROPERTY LINE
—OHP —OHP�� — — — wnr —OH1
I �
I �
0
W -- - - - - - - - - - - -
_W_
--- —------w-- --
W- ---
Tr
y
0 IN L—wim PR
0
I
0
o
\ I Q I
E \9yQ /
\
T \ LU
N
E L.L.
Y I �
z .0 / \
a ° / U
�Q
° /
z
o� / J
>LLJ° / 1
D- o /
p
0
U � /
-C
p
o oo,
i
U O I I
° I I I I II p(/ ° •
■
7
■
—W------W------W---
i
i
to ° p — — —�-- — —
° �— I
b.p ° \\ \
\ \/
• , // �
.�
20' FIRE ACCESS / /
DRIVE (TYP.) �/ / �(
/
BUFFER TO BE SUPPLEMENTED @ RATE OF
■I 2 CANOPY TREES PER 50 LF PER SECTION 9.1.4� �/ / J O
� \\ � PROPERTY LINE /
--�----- ��---- — / GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
>pF—
0 15 30 60
z z cn
Lv Lv z
0
0 0
U U W
N O
KANFJ
REALTY CORPORATION
erge Capital
KimlepMorn
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
RALEIGH, NC 27601
PHONE: [phone]
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
#F-0102
_;� \\ \ �z TREE CONSERVATION NOTES: J DAV IS
_ TREE CONSERVATION AREA - \ X
1. A TREE CONSERVATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED TO
GREENWAY (3,388 SF) (0.078 ACRES) / \\ ESTABLISH TREE CONSERVATION AREAS IN THE FIELD.
2. A TREE CONSERVATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO
ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT.
N 10' ASPHALT / / 3. PRIOR TO OBTAINING A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING
MULTI -USE -PATH --- WILL BE RECORDED WITH THE WAKE COUNTY REGISTER OF
/� / � Ss� �
. / DEEDS:
F� (TYP) A.) TREE CONSERVATION AREA MUST BE RECORDED
o� "1� PRIOR TO OBTAINING A BUILDING PERMIT PER UDO
9.1.5.A.2. Q4v G
4. NEW PLANTINGS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE 1 FO
E / i CRITICAL ROOTZONE OF ANY EXISTING TREE LOCATED �O
o
II I G�� / / /l WITHIN A TREE CONSERVATION AREA.
Q I I II lb. , 5. TREE CONSERVATION AREAS IN THE NEUSE RIVER BUFFER
-C° 20' PRIVATE I I II I / F� �`� / / ZONE 2 AND TREE CONSERVATION - GREENWAY AREAS
o co DRAINAGE I I II �= QP` _ / / / >, SHALL BE PLANTED AT A RATE OF TWO SHADE TREES PER � � � of
/ F `' �` _ /� / / / 50 LINEAR FEET WHEN EXISTING VEGETATION IS U N O Q Q �
\ EASEMENT (TYP.) I I II / R / ,l
(''� / / % — INSUFFICIENT. _D N O c=n
a I II �I ■ // O j �l il� �� 6. CRZ =CRITICAL ROOT ZONE O ~ \ m m
i Q �
rI I �� / ` PEDESTRIAN GREENWAY BRIDGE
o \ ?: Z / I I ■ ■ //�� ,/ (EXACT LOCATION AND
/ REQUIREMENTS TO BE
I / F� // / / DETERMINED AT SITE PERMIT
� / I / REVIEW LEVEL)
> I / I I ■ / S� / TOP OF BANK
(TYP) 50' STREAM /
JI THOROUGHFARE T /
/ / / �' BUFFER TYP. /
Q ° / / / �� , / j ( )
_FCA AREA 2/ 2 / / /
FLOODWAY (TYP)
// 75' GREENWAY
L Q THOROUGHFARE / I / EASEMENT TYP.
° \ TCA AREA 1 I (TYP.)
75' GREENWAY
� EASEMENT (TYP.)
0
\ �/ � TREE CONSERVATION AREA-
L6 _0�� \\ / / 50' STREAM / GREENWAY (7,498 SF) (0.172 ACRES)
0)
° BUFFER (TYP.) /
-_ � = � � / �� �� �� /
TREE CONSERVATION AREA - / EXISTING 10 ASPHALT
GREENWAY (10,398 SF) (0.239 ACRES) %� / MULTI -USE -PATH (TYP.)
w
EXISTING TREE CRZ (TYP.) N /
o EXISTING TREE (TYP.)
N
Q 0.1% OF CRZ OUTSIDE TCA '
11.7% OF CRZ OUTSIDE TCA — >, 28.1% OF CRZ OUTSIDE TCA
EXISTING TREES NOT COUNTED / �� (SEE NOTE 7)
w TOWARDS BASAL AREA CALCULATIONS 15.8% OF CRZ OUTSIDE TCA
A o (SEE NOTE 8)
o PRIMARY TREE CONSERVATION
J AREA -THOROUGHFARE \ /
(4,264 SF) (0.098 ACRES)
21.4% OF CRZ OUTSIDE TCA
0
Q
♦ �
•V
n 40' ♦ At
' ;
U
Ar I'
o
Q
_�
0
a)
C,
L
O
LL
�
E
m
D
U
U
O
�U)
0�
■
■
■
.aa_�
PHASE 1 A TCA CALCULATIONS
DESCRIPTION
AREA (SF)
NETS ITE AREA
(GROSS SITE AREA LESS
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION)
248,549
REQUIRED TCA (10%)
24,855
PRIMARY TCA
THOROUGHFARE
4,264
GREENWAY
AREA TOTAL
21,284
TOTAL PROPOSED SF
25,548
(10.3%)
LEGEND
PRIMARY TREE
CONSERVATION AREA
TREE CONSERVATION
AREA - GREENWAY
(OVERLAPS WITH ZONE 2
NEUSE BUFFER)
EXISTING TREE
CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (CRZ)
EXISTING TREE NOT
COUNTED TOWARDS BASAL
AREA CALCULATIONS
CODE
NAME
T1
Southern Sugar Maple
T2
Boxelder Maple
T3
Red Maple
T4
Silver Maple
T5
Pecan
T6
Southem Hackberry
T7
Chinese Elm
T8
Flowering Dogwood
T9
Persimmon
T10
American Beech
T11
American Holly
T12
Black Walnut
T13
Eastern Red Cedar
T14
Yellow Poplar
T15
Sweetgum
T16
Yellow Poplar
T17
Red Mulberry
T18
Blackgum
T19
Loblolly Pine
T20
Sycamore
T21
Princess Tree
T22
Black Cherry
T23
Callery Pear
T24
Swamp Whlte Oak
T25
Willow Oak
T26
Northern Red Oak
T27
Black Locust
T28
I Black Willow
T29
lAmerican Elm
SITE AERIAL
SCALE: 1 " = 200'
7. TREES OVER 10 INCHES DBH WITH 25% OR MORE OF THEIR
o INQ
o
m
o
CRITICAL ROOT ZONE IMPACTED BY DEVELOPMENT OR
Q —
\
z
z
Y
LOCATED OUTSIDE TREE CONSERVATION AREAS WILL NOT
= O
r
O
w
J
c°
<
Q
�
w
BE COUNTED TOWARDS BASAL AREA CALCULATIONS.
8. TREES LISTED ON THE CITY OF RALEIGH INVASIVE SPECIES
LIST WILL NOT BE COUNTED TOWARDS BASAL AREA
CALCULATIONS.
9. TREE PROTECTION FENCE IS SHOWN OFFSET FOR CLARITY.
Z
FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON TCA BOUNDARY.
0
GENERAL NOTES:
1. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 9.1 OF THE CITY OF RALEIGH
UDO WILL BE REQUIRED AT SITE PLAN OR SUBDIVISION.
Q
2. TREE LOCATIONS ON THIS PLAN HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM
A TREE SURVEY PERFORMED BY KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOC.
/
DATED AUGUST 8, 2020.
3. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND
W
Z
DISTANCES IN U.S. SURVEY FEET. (UNLESS OTHERWISE
U)
v�
Q
STATED)
Z
J
4. ALL BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH CAROLINA
^
L.L
STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM (NAD 1983/2011).
O
5. ALL AREAS WHERE TREE CONSERVATION HAS BEEN
`
PROPOSED WITHIN THE ZONE 2 BUFFER SHALL BE
V
SUPPLEMENTED AS NECESSARY PER CITY OF RALEIGH
w
UDO SECTION 9.1
Nw
I
U Iz
E
0<
VJ
�
O
Q
LIJ
VJ
0
w
<
W
LLJ
Z
Q
CD
w
J
Q
0
O
^
L.L
�
C-)
SHEET NUMBER
TC1.0

0 0 M
m m m
0
6
0
O
O
N
Q
a
O
i
O
I
T
E
Y
O
.1
6
0
0
0
0
('t
U)
=5X40' SIGHT TIE INTO EX. CURB
0 1 TRIANGLE & GUTTER (TYP.)
1
1
Ocn
1
\'9�\
PROPOSED PROPOSED � � \�t\ \ \
ROW �
ROW 15' X 390'---°w------ ---- Cw------- ---� --
/--------
_ _ ____—---------- SIGHT
/
- TRIANGLE _
15' X 390' SIGHT
15' X 340' SIGHT EXISTING EXISTING LOCKABLE/REMOVABLE
TRIANGLE PROPOSED BIKE �+ LOADING I / EXISTING TRIANGLE
RACK (TYP.) ROW ROW S . SAU N D E RS STREET ZONE j ROW BOLLARDS, TYP.
_z— I j PROPOSED BIKE _ /
�- - - - - - - - - - ------------------------ I ---- --- RACK TYP. /
--- _---(8)UPA ---- _ _ ------ _--------- _ -- (TYP.) _ EXISTING _
�---------------- ------------------ -- ---------------___--- — - SIDEWALK -------- - - - _------------
- - ---- —
--- --
-�� ------ ----------------�= WALK----- -
0 1 � - �- --•-- Z�r- �.����� �.'--•--'-__ �---�- -�--r - - -- - __ - - - _ ---•------r---- �r=--- ____�----- E (TYP) --- r-----�---� �-�---'� ------r--- r----'ter-----r-----r----- ----�--- --w
_ ROW
to s
'� j
__ ---
--------------- ---------- —® C1 --------------- --- — — — — _ D a ° — —25.
---
_ . n .QI g< (3) UPA _ — _ _ 1Q'102 — — r 1124 0 E 05. 1 —
��t�?c—
r 62.10' —
° 79.50' S 10_49'57" W — > — — — — — —
1 S 45-2w055602" W� ♦ CONCRET I n--------- —
Y8' 3+ + + \
+ % SIDEWAL
° �'° \s? PROPOSED ROW
V'C� DEDICATION
0 "t
(D
Q 30" CURB &
O\ /+ GUTTER (TYP.)
z o
/n E /�� ` j /o� PROPOSED PROPERTY r` /
�w LINE (TYP.)
� j
o /
98SR�'c PUBLIC ACCESS
j o �, \ EASMENT /
;�,y EDGE OF
° \/i PAVEMENT /
01
a ic, I /
a s Op-
Qa FF J +
o POD A
o, BOUNDARY I I I A + +
L On \\ \ LONG TERM BIKE I I j 1 I
Q)) \ PARKING LOCATED
Q \ \ IN BUILDING I I 1 + +I
\ 30 CORPUD SS 1
-3 vti5 \ rn EASEMENT I I 1 I
0
\b� PROPOSED BIKE
RACK (TYP.) I 1 +
0 3 0�
20' PRIVATE DRAINAGE
0- 0 SA. EASEMENT (TYP.) � I
o CONCRETE /�
\ SIDEWALK
(TYP.)
orx i i rrr
o 2.9.76' a,
0- N 044_5'09" E�x, 20' CITY OF LOCKABLE/REMOVABLE I +
a - y 2s, RALEIGH SANITARY BOLLARDS, TYP. s+
/ 0 `/R�, SEWER EASEMENT X + +I
POD A ,v 20• f I +
Q\+ 1'5 s2` BOUNDARY
6,2
o °
a TREE PROTECTION FENCE
° (TYP.) \
c
n .N PRIMARY TREE \ _
CONSERVATION AREA (SEE
.L SHEET TC1.0) S R
10' PUBLIC ACCESS
Q o / EASEMENT (TYP.) 2g2 1.
_j \+ sr/..
(D /
i
Q —00 \ +\+
U) \ r \+
Zo
+ + + + + + + >
PROPOSED ROW ++ I+ + ++ +
+ ++ ++ + ++ + + + ++ ++ + + +
+ + +�—+ ` /
+ +++ �ENTRYPLAZA ++++ + ++ +}++
Q+ + + + ++ + + ++ + + ++ + PROPOSED ROW + + + ++ Oi / +LU
w -
+ + + + + + +
+ + + + + + TYPICAVAMENITY�I A
U)I + + ++ ++ + +�++ TYPICAL MENITY ARE ++ + //' + + //i /i / (37,6V F) /
+/
U + + + + + (36,416 SF + + + /' / + + �' i // // //
J +++ +++ ++i' /+ i / / /
m + // 6
+ + +� +I} + + + ' /i + s'+ � 20' FIRE ACCESS 30' CORPUD SS
I
+ + + + + j" + + + + + �' + + / DRIVE (TYP.) // EASEMENT + + // / + � I
/ /}+ ++ + ++ ++ + + ++ + �/� 20' PUBLIC DRAINAGE ///// / ` .•
I +II + + + + + I I + + + + + + + + + i + + / i EASEMENT / // / S / •�'
II+ + + + I� __ _ + + �_+_ �_+� /' + + /' // /
PRIVATE DRAINAGE + + + + + +� �+ +++ + + + + // /+ + // /// / / �� •' +/ /
II + + + + I + + + + + TERRA E + + + + /' / / / // /i ///
EASEMENT (TYP.) It + + + + + + + + + + + + /+ + +" / // ✓ /'�J /+
/ II + ++ + + ++ + + + + + + + + -�� + /// /// /�/ //// " J
r s -
/ + + + + + + + + + + + ♦ r( • S/ / r
/ + + ++ + + + + + + + + + / \ \ / \ // / / / /
/ >��` + / +01
— — — — — — — — — — — — — —__ i
�'+ P _ _ _ TREE CONSERVATION AREA -
+ + / • GREENWAY SUPPLEMENTAL /
+ PLANTINGS
+
+ / + + ` D -- - 4 + + + + + + + + �// / Fw (7) NS
+ % +° +° + +° + + -� / Fw� (7)TD TREE PROTECTION
+9/+� + ++ + + TYPICAL AMENITY AREA i�� + ++ + + +�' \• 10' ASPHALT FENCE (TYP.) (SEE
LEGEND
PRIMARY TREE
CONSERVATION AREA
TREE CONSERVATION AREA - GREENWAY
(DENOTES AREAS WHERE GREENWAY
OVERLAPS ZONE 2 NEUSE BUFFER)
PRIMARY COMMON
OPEN SPACE
+ + ++
+ +
AMENITY AREA
EXISTING TREE LOCATION
i 1 CRITICAL ROOT ZONE
1 /
„F TREE PROTECTION FENCE
NOTES:
13REES CANNOT BE PLANTED WITHIN A TREE
CONSERVATION AREA OR THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE
OF AN EXISTING TREE AND MUST BE PLANTED AT
LEAST15 FEET FROM ANY OTHER TREE AND NO
FURTHER THAN 50 FEET FROM ANY OTHER TREE,
MEASURED FROM TREE TRUNK TO TREE TRUNK
(UDO 5.3.1.F.3.C). IF PROPOSED TREES CONFLICT
WITH EXISTING TREES, FINAL PLANTING AREAS
SHALL BE FIELD ADJUSTED AS REQUIRED
2. ALL TREES LOCATED WITHIN A SITE DISTANCE
TRIANGLE SHALL BE LIMBED UP AND MAINTAINED 8'
MIN ABOVE FINISHED GRADE TO PROVIDE CLEAR
SITE LINES.
3. TREE PROTECTION FENCE IS SHOWN OFFSET FOR
CLARITY. FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON TCA
BOUNDARY.
+/+ ++ + + + + + 36,416 SF ++ "' / MULTI -USE -PATH
+ + + + \ NOTE 3) ✓ ® /
+ (TYP.) -�Ile✓
�+
+ + + + + + + + + PRIMARY COMMON OPEN + ++ ++ + + ++ ++ • SPACE (51,449 SF)
+ + + ++ + O ++ + + + AMENITY POOL + ` �' �' �/ EX. CITY OF RALEIGH
+ + + + + + DECK + + ` ROCKY BRANCH I
—� + + + + p + + + + + + PEDESTRIAN I� -x x
+ +p+ + + + + + + + + i/ / GREENWAY / ��� / �.� GREENWAY TRAIL
* •� '
+ +O + ++ ++ + ++ / ++ 4~ BRIDGE
+ + ++ + /++ +, ; /� N / / / % , ,�-' PLANT SCHEDULE
+ / CANOPY TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT. CALIPER HEIGHT REMARKS
++++++++++ ++ i , ++ / � / QO G / O / /' / + / / I
+ + + / + / / / TOP OF BANK
+ ++ ++ + + ++ +/ ++ / / // // (TYP.) ,\ //I *�*/ / + BN 9 BETULA NIGRA I RIVER BIRCH 10 GAL 1.5" CAL 6'-8' HT. PLANTED SHADE TREES
+
+ + + + + + / J1L '' / .!� / / 1 MUST BE FREE OF
+ ++ ++ + ++/! + ++ / / / / / r - /� / CIRCLING ROOTS AT TIME
+ + + +� + + fj / / / �e , OF PLANTING
/ I
® + ++ + ' �/ /'" E 50' STREAM % �_ _ - -/ NS 8 NYSSA SYLVATICA BLACK GUM 10 GAL 1.5" CAL 6'-8' HT. PLANTED SHADE TREES
+ ''� + / / ♦ (4) NS BUFFER (TYP.) - % / MUST BE FREE OF
10' GRASS r►�� / / % y CIRCLING ROOTS AT TIME
PAVERS (TYP.) / , / I OF PLANTING
k
+ • 75' GREENWAY ' (e) Qa
+ �i + +/� 4, EASEMENT (TYP.) , �+ / / QB 10 QUERCUS BICOLPR SWAMP WHITE OAK 10 GAL 1.5" CAL 6'-8' HT. PLANTED SHADE TREES
+ / + / + / �c + , / / / MUST BE FREE OF
+// + + // *� / CIRCLING ROOTS AT TIME
+ -+ ++ �/ ++ TREE CONSERVATION (4)Ty / / /
+ + + + AREA (SEE SHEET TC1.0) r 75' GREENWAY /
/ / 1 OF PLANTING
\ ++ /+ ++ + • �� / / / /j �r / EASEMENT (TYP.) i
+/
a SD ;
O �� / ��•
� m t
Q a \ , �1
Cn
c o �� ff
-C if / , / ..� off ; i
E
-0
Q �
0
0 0,
L O
LL
m
0
-6 O
0�
d: ---
I
Ell
/ 50' STREAM / EX. PROPERTY
BUFFER (TYP.) LINE (TYP.)
TREE CONSERVATION AREA - t�
GREENWAY SUPPLEMENTAL /
PLANTINGS
i
EX. CITY OF RALEIGH /
ROCKY BRANCH
GREENWAY TRAIL
PRIMARY COMMON OPEN
SPACE (51,449 SF)
TREE CONSERVATION/
AREA (SEE SHEET TC1.0)
i /60
\
\
NJ
xis "'ice \
TD 8 TAXODIUM DI S ICHUM BALD CYPRESS 10 GAL 1.5" CAL 6'-8' HT. PLANTED SHADE TREES
/ MUST BE FREE OF
/ CIRCLING ROOTS AT TIME
OF PLANTING
• UPA 11 ULMUS PARVIFOLIA'ALLEE' ALLEE LACEBARK ELM B&B 3" CAL 14'-16' HT.
UNDERSTORY TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME
0 PC 9 PiSTACIA CHINENSIS
COMMON NAME CONT. CALIPER HEIGHT REMARKS
CHINESE PISTACHE B&B 1.5" CAL 10'-12' HT.
LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS & CALCULATIONS
Z-32-18 MP-3-18 PD Narrative
SQUARE FEET/
AREA TO BE LANDSCAPED
REQUIREMENT
TOTAL QUANTITY REQUIRED
TOTAL QUANTITY PROVIDED
LINEAR FEET
CANOPYTREES SPACED 40' O.C.
S SAUNDERS STREET
600 LF
600 / 40 = 15 STREET TREES
17 STREET TREES*
IN TREE GRATES
INTERIOR STREET A
CANOPYTREES SPACED 40' O.C.
114 LF
114 / 40 = 3 STREET TREES
3 STREET TREES
IN TREE GRATES
TREE CONSERVATION AREA -
2 CANOPYTREES PER 50 LF OF
GREENWAY
TCA - GREENWAY AREA NOT
865 LF
(865 / 50) * 2 = 35 CANOPY TREES
35 CANOPY TREES
(SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS)
CONTAINING EXISTING TREES
AMENTY SPACE
10% OF TOTAL POD AREA
248,549SF
248,549 SF * 10% = 24,855 SF
36,416 SF (15% )
51,449 SF PRIMARY COMMON OPEN
COMMON OPEN SPACE
10% OF TOTAL POD AREA
248,549 SF
248,549 SF * 10% = 24,855 SF
SPACE** (21%)
* Understory trees spaced 20' o.c. in tree grates have been proposed in place of canopy trees where overhead ponerline conflicts exist. Strees trees are spaced a minimum of 30'
from proposed stop sign location.
Primary Open Space provided exceeds the requirement, therefore provisions of secondary and tertiary open space has not been allocated.
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
N
W
O O
z z Cn
LL LLJ z
O
0 o >
U U W
m
U U
INl—izl
KANE
REALTY CORPORATION
erge Capital
Kimley*Horn
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
RALEIGH, NC 27601
PHONE: [phone]
WWW.KIMLEY—HORN.COM
#F-0102
J DAV I S `-
N
O
Q
Q
:�E
LLJ N
O
=
O O
N
LLJDO
Q
m
DO
0
Ld
o
Q
O
\
LLJ
Z
Z
Y
Y
O
w
<
_
v
V)
0
0
O
Z
J
0-
LU
I..L
C) U)/
0
Z
J
1
U
z
D
0
LL
LIJ
U/
0
w
Q
w
LLJ
Z
1..�
CD
LLJ
LL-
O
0
n
U
SHEET NUMBER
L1.0

6
O
Q
O
C
O
E
O
0
3
0
0
0
Q
0
T
E
Y
0
Q
� o
W
J
Q
W CO
o�
t
W .N
� O
Q
U �
U o
Z �
Q
J
o
N �
J O
u
O
�o
U O
L
0
Q
o
QQ
E
w ry
U O
a
Q
o
N
0
o
o
/o
W
o
u
J
Q
/ O
cn
O
D
7
E�
a w
00
N �
0
O
0
N �
O
N O
Ln �
T)
T L
O
W -
J N
Q O
LL N
co
W O
Q O
U N
E
W L
z
Q
o 0
N cn
J o
o
T
0 0
J
� O
co
N
un a
u)
O
Y o
Q �
W O
N
u a
0 �
0 0
U
E
Q �
o c,
L
o
Q
LL �
m
0�
DO NOT PRUNE LEADER. PRUNE OR CUT ONLY
DEAD OR DAMAGED BRANCHES TO AMERICAN NATIONAL
STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI) A300 STANDARDS
REMOVE EXCESS SOIL TO EXPOSE THE ROOT FLARE.
THE ROOT FLARE SHALL BE PLANTED AT GRADE,
NO HIGHER THAN 2" ABOVE GRADE, AND NEVER
BELOW GRADE. TREE SHALL BE SET PLUMB
MULCH DEPTH NOT MORE THAN 3". KEEP MULCH 3"
FROM ROOT FLARE AND DO NOT CONTACT STEM
PLANTING SOIL MIX AROUND ROOT BALL. 600 CU FT
OF SOIL OR STRUCTURAL SOIL REQUIRED PER TREE
COMPLETELY REMOVE TOP HALF OF BURLAP,
LACING STRAPS, NAILS AND WIRE BASKET AND
DISCARD FROM HOLE. ALL SYNTHETIC BURLAP
MUST BE REMOVED FROM SIDES OF ROOT BALL.
ROOT BALL SHALL BE PLACED DIRECTLY ON
COMPACTED SUBGRADE. HANDLE TREE BY THE
ROOT BALL ONLY.
CONTACT INFORMATION:
CITY OF RALEIGH PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL
RESOURCES DEPARTMENT URBAN FORESTER:
[e-mail]
WWW.RALEIGHNC.GOV
NOTES:
1. TREES MUST MEET THE TREE QUALITY STANDARDS
IN CH. 2 OF THE CITY TREE MANUAL.
2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
ADEQUATE DRAINAGE OF ALL PLANTING PITS.
(POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM PIT)
3. TREES SHALL BE PLANTED BETWEEN
OCTOBER 1ST AND APRIL 30TH.
4. A TREE IMPACT PERMIT IS REQUIRED.
5. ELECTRICAL OUTLETS AND OTHER UTILITIES
ARE PROHIBITED IN THE PLANTING AREA
IMMEDIATELY SURROUNDING THE TREE.
6. IF STAKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY
TREE MANUAL, THE STAKING MUST BE REMOVED
WITHIN ONE YEAR.
7. TREES WILL HAVE A MINIMUM 1 YEAR WARRANTY
AFTER THE INITIAL PLANTING IS APPROVED BY THE CITY.
73 3/8" FRAME
721/4" FRAME
36"
i®I
GRAY IRON, RECTANGULAR 4'X6', 1.5" MIN. THICK, WITH 1/4"
OPENING OR LESS
NOTES:
1. GRATE DESIGN MUST BE ADA COMPLIANT.
2. GENERAL PATTERN DESIGN MUST BE AS SHOWN.
3. EXCEPTIONS OR PERSONALIZATION MUST BE REVIEWED
AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH.
4. A TREE IMPACT PERMIT IS REQUIRED.
5. ADHERE TO STANDARDS IN THE CITY TREE MANUAL.
6. ELECTRIC OUTLETS AND OTHER UTILITIES ARE
PROHIBITED IN THE GRATE AREA.
CONTACT INFORMATION:
CITY OF RALEIGH PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL
RESOURCES DEPARTMENT URBAN
FORESTER:[e-mail]
WWW.RALEIGHNC.GOV
9.
®® �® m --
we
/', dal\\\\ \\
-
E IL_ ..A'!III-
ALL
M M
SLOTS ARE -
Y" WIDE MAX.
BOLT TREE GRATE HALVES TOGETHER w/
(2)1l2"A 3 x 3" STNL. STL. HEX BOLTS,
GALV. FLAT WASHERS AND STNL. STL. HEX NUT
�.f
7"
1 1 /4 11
A -
4 3/44
4 3/4"
1" I II I �1 3/4' N
m m
NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE IN ENGLISH
MATERIAL: CAST GRAY IRON ASTM A48, CLASS 35B
FINISH: NO PAINT
WEIGHT: 608#/SET
Nz
O O
� U
J W
ON
m O
0
CV co
z
0
�w
o
co
W
a
FRAMES ARE ASSEMBLED
USING A 6" X 1 1/4" X 1/4"
THICK STEEL PLATE BOLTED
TO FRAME w/ (2) 3/8-16UNC
—1 1/2" X 1 STNLS STL. FLAT HD.
— 3/4" CAP SCREWS
I
BOLTED PLATE (2) 3/8-16UNC
TAPPED HOLES
ASSEMBLY DETAIL
Z
W
0
W
�0
+I OCL
Q ,
M W Q
U �
u-of
ca
m
co
NOTE: SEE TREE
PLANTING DETAIL
SECTION
MULCH 3" DEEP MAX. AND 3" MIN. FROM THE
BASE OF THE TREE
SIDEWALK PAVING AND SUBBASE
PLANTING SOIL
4" DIAMETER PVC PIPE WRAPPED IN FABRIC
LOCATED IN THE LOWEST POINT AND CONNECTED TO
THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM WHERE APPLICABLE
COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE
NOTES:
1. A SITE SPECIFIC PLAN MUST BE DEVELOPED TO ENSURE THAT:
1.1. EACH TREE IS PROVIDED A MIN. ROOT -ACCESSIBLE SOIL VOLUME OF 600 CUBIC FEET.
1.2. THE TREE ROOT AREA BENEATH THE SIDEWALK IS EXPANDED TO MAXIMIZE ROOT ACCESSIBLE SOIL SPACE UNDER
THE PAVEMENT.
1.3. CONNECT SOIL SPACE FOR ROOT EXPANSION WHERE POSSIBLE TO ALLOW ROOT SYSTEMS OF TREES TO OVERLAP
AND COLONIZE A SHARED SOIL SPACE.
1.4. ANY COMBINATION OF STRUCTURAL SOILS, SOIL CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (e.g., SILVA CELL), OR ROOT CHANNELING (e.g.,
SOIL STRIP DRAIN/AERATION SYSTEM) THAT PERFORMS AS SPECIFIED IS ACCEPTABLE.
3. 40' X 6' WIDTH MINIMUM APPLIES TO BOTH STRUCTURAL SOILS AND SUBSURFACE SOIL CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS.
4. SUBSURFACE APPLICATION SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY CITY OF RALEIGH PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL
RESOURCES URBAN FORESTRY DIVISION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
STRUCTURAL SOIL SYSTEM
CONTACT INFORMATION:
CITY OF RALEIGH PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
URBAN FORESTER: [e-mail]
WWW.RALEIGHNC.GOV
asioll
NG/PATHWAYS
ROAD
CITY OF RALEIGH
STANDARD DETAIL
REVISIONS I DATE: &2020 NOT TO SCALE
TREE PLANTING IN
SIDEWALK WITHIN ROW
TPP-07
co
� H-
z z cn
w w z
O
O O
U U L1J
m
u u
I I I I INI—IzI
KANE
REALTY CORPORATION
erge Capital
Kimley*Horn
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
RALEIGH, NC 27601
PHONE: [phone]
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
#F-0102
J DAV IS `
N
O
Q
Q
:E
LLJD N
O
u
O 0
N
LLJ\
r
r
o N
mLd
o
o
Q
\
W
z
z
Y
�0
U)
Q
o
Q
W
0
W
D_
=
U)
o
o
0
U)
1
TYPICAL CITY OF RALEIGH TREE PLANTING DETAIL TYPCIAL CITY OF RALEIGH TREE GRATE IN SIDEWALK WITHIN ROW TYPCIAL CITY OF RALEIGH TREE PLANTING IN SIDEWALK WITHIN ROW LJJ
0 NTS SECTION NTS SECTION NTS
LnJJ
rC)
V
0
Z
J
1
z
Z
0<
v /
�
O
LlJ
U)
�0
LL
L LJ
~
Q
LJJ
w
N
1..�
C
J
LL-
0
�
n
Li
\
u
SHEET NUMBER
L2.0

vilrilow
joi �I jim
INS 11-11 Eli 3, hal
Al W
' ' _ �■ :r: ' ' I I in X.—
mill1 I 1 ilirl
�111
oil ��� 1 1�. ����1
- �,�i.li..*■"To I ii ■-i i
A111 i: m m i
v.d!
MONISM=
V ■, ■ �I�w��. ��,! l.■■■■.■■.■■■■■ M■. 11
_I 11! I IM! 1 __■_1'''I__I 1 I_ •
11■■1■I■ �■le■■1■I�
NOW
11■■ 1■■I■ IE1 11 111111110in I _k�,
1!■��1■I■�1■■11■■1.I�
:1:1 in, :1 pool
:1:11 _!�_ ■ � r :111; i I ill
11Mimi : m1 �■®. +mill 1■I�
i I ��■ � [ill:1 �- i +��
"'
72
: : ■�i.�: :.i.i i 1 1 ■ ■ ■ ■im
.i .�■ ■s. __n I,1 ■ ■ ■!w
III '■■ ■ ■NIMMI
:E :�: :C _ I,1 ■ ■ . ■ ■■
R
■i ■i�+l ii C 1 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
■i ■.W%/ ■i I,1 ■ ■ ■MMMN.. ■
■i our:
� !,1 ■ ■ ■.■ ■
■i ■
.i Nor, - 1 1 ■ ■ ■ ■.■
a :MMWP� i 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
►1►I►I�
V, lr, ■w..,9►, RW.,�i_
.. ,..:� PASSTHRU 7
99
aw■ -
oil =
No
■ ■ = ■ ■
NEW
■
1:19.0.14i ffm
�■i■■!,1■11,1■■II■i,1■■I,1■11■■i■llli■1■■III■i■1■11■1
■■
log
I I
I Arm
PEI
rI�IIIillill■ �- �■
1m,�■�1' 1■ :I �■■ d ��� i�■� �■� .t_ -mil-. ■1 ■ .� I■ —■ ■ ■1 .� .m
11 on owl 411
IIIIIiIPfIIIRfIII� _ '� - �
MEN No
lilt_ �r;I ��1 �■ 5
I: NINE
jII ■■■ �■■■i �� 11 i� I ,�_H� -,
■� WIN 111-1II I:on:I I::::I I: OEM A III :: �I II■j �I IIyy��' I'll
�■ I. �1 ,1�. �I I■ ■■ IIII ■■ Ill I. . ■ �I I■ . ■ ■ Il . ■ IIII ,�� - I I II� � II
.� �■ �■ I■■I � Ilil III ,... I � �■ I �■
r � I■
lion��1^ I�::I I::::I I:::I I: ::I I: as •I 1� :: �I I :zp,
!!! ; I ;I ; ;I
I It 1 1 ■■■ ■ i■ ■ 1■ 1 ■ ■■ ■ 1 ■■ llm.1.■I I■ ■ ■ �I 1■ ■ ■ 11 I� 1 ■ •I I■ ;■ ■ ■I Il . ■ >II I I I,J IIII II
I-li� m � . �■
1■ 11 ■I 1� ■I I■ ■on ■ III III :::I I: A I �I I� ::I I � :: 1 � I ICI � �� I I� IIII II
�■ �. �I. ■■■ IIII ,�
kil IIITlIFIf =:� .'ll � , ! IIII I � II, �I I-
ME .�■ ■ I loll
1 �N !'ll NN !I I��Ih to mc.uui.1.
I II III■ �■■:■■■��:I�rl■:■�� � �!�■■:■■■■:■:■�
RONNIE
■■! ! !!_!=■:■�:��■:■■:■■■■��:■:
-INN �■■■�■-�ME In
I I■■�■■:■■� loin
■_���__■-� NEW ■■■■mC■■l
II:1 AU 1F 1 1 10
■■ INS ■■■
I■ ■■■� 1�._ ..
Mimi,; ■ I■■=_1i■i■� ■1N —mm■I SE■N ■_ _■■■ --
s ma %Eqg w-
:1 its MKW40r, I C I ro,
o11
1
:U�li[I

264.98
AVERAGE EXI G GR
S SAUNDERS (MOST RE
*NOTE: SIGNAGE IS
PERMITTED SEPARATELY
ELEVATIONS
1Q.V\IE
REALTY CORPORATION
Merge Capital
PARKING DECK
PARK CITY SOUTH
SP2.01
11 - 11 RES 1_ 1 n
373.00'
10-10RES 1_ 0
362.33'
09 - RES 0_ 9 n
351.67'
08 -RES
341.00'
07 - RES 0_ 7 n
330.0
06 -RES 0_ 6 I1
319.67' 1
05 - RES 0_ 5 I1
309.00' 1
04 -RES 0_ 4 n
298.33' V
03 - RES 0_ 3 n
287.67' 1
02 -RES
277.00' 1
00 - RETAIL LEVEL n
258.00'
EAST ELEVATION
1" = 20'-0"
Kiomley))) Horn J DAVIS >

LEVEL
TYPE
COUNT LEVEL
TYPE
COUNT
PARKING DECK- FIRST FLOOR (1
PARKING DECK
01 FIRST FLOOR
8'-6" X 18' - 90 DEG ADA
2
01 FIRST FLOOR
9'-0" X 18' - 90 DEG VAN
4
01 FIRST FLOOR
9'-0" X 18' - 90 DEG
62
68
02 SECOND FLOOR
8'-6" X 18' - 90 DEG ADA
2
02 SECOND FLOOR
9'-0" X 18' - 90 DEG
66
68
03 THIRD FLOOR
8'-6" X 18' - 90 DEG ADA
2
03 THIRD FLOOR
9'-0" X 18' - 90 DEG
66
68
04 FOURTH FLOOR
8'-6" X 18' - 90 DEG ADA
2
04 FOURTH FLOOR
9'-0" X 18' - 90 DEG
66
68
05 FIFTH FLOOR
8'-6" X 18' - 90 DEG ADA
2
05 FIFTH FLOOR
9'-0" X 18' - 90 DEG
66
68
06 SIXTH FLOOR
8'-6" X 18' - 90 DEG ADA
2
06 SIXTH FLOOR
9'-0" X 18' - 90 DEG
66
68
n
0
E 85.90'
/
/
/ \
/ N \
lf) \
PARKING DECK- TYPICAL FLOORS (2-10)12
1116"=1'-0
07 SEVENTH FLOOR
8'-6" X 18' - 90 DEG ADA
2
07 SEVENTH FLOOR
9'-0" X 18' - 90 DEG
66
68
08 EIGHTH FLOOR
8'-6" X 18' - 90 DEG ADA
1
08 EIGHTH FLOOR
9'-0" X 18' - 90 DEG
67
68
09 NINTH FLOOR
8'-6" X 18' - 90 DEG ADA
1
09 NINTH FLOOR
9'-0" X 18' - 90 DEG
67
68
10 TENTH FLOOR
8'-6" X 18' - 90 DEG ADA
1
10 TENTH FLOOR
9'-0" X 18' - 90 DEG
67
68
11 ELEVENTH FLOOR
8'-6" X 18' - 90 DEG ADA
0
11 ELEVENTH FLOOR
9'-0" X 18' - 90 DEG
11
11
TOTAL
8'-4" X 16' - 90 DEG ADA
21
8'-8" X 18' - 60 DEG
670
691
NCBC 1106:
2% OF TOTALSPACES
OR
1 FOR EACH TYPE A UNIT
336 RESIDENTIAL UNITS
5% TO BE TYPE A UNITS = 17 TYPE A UNITS
17 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED (3 OF WHICH WOULD BE
VAN SPACES)
OR
TOTAL SPACES, 2%= 16 REQUIRED TO BE ACCESSIBLE 3 OF WHICH
WOULD BE VAN SPACES
PROVIDED
18 ADA SPACES
3 VAN SPACES
670 REGULAR SPACES
691 TOTAL SPACES
� 1
_PARKING DECK- TOP FLOOR (11) 3
1116" = V-0"
Merge Capital
REALTY CORPORATION
PARK CITY SOUTH
SP3.01
Kimley>>>Horn

r
271' - 0"
FLEX SPACE A FLEX SPACE B
I 140 150
2,093 SF 2,123 SF
■
272' -10"
�v
269 - 0"
FLEX SPACE C
160
2,603 SF
15
4 270' -11"
XFORMERS MAIN ELEC v
135 136
� 5.99%
269 - 0"
I o
■
266' - 0" \ /
D&-M—Es TIC \ N / I J
WATER 2�' °"
u RESIDENTIAL
LOBBY
too
LILJ
■
/
\
\
42'-0"
101'-6"
\
\
\
270, - 0"
I
"
4.93%
_ i
265' - 0"
7
I
u
UTIL
131
15
\
\
LOADING &
■ ■ ■
■ ■ ■ ■ ■
■
s
TRASH
130
■
■
IL
— —
■
000
■
�■
i
263' 0�
•
a
•
_
�
M
0000
/ ♦
`
//
/
263' - 0"
26Z - 0"
■ °
/
0000
I
BIKE ROOM
I
I 120
Il�
LOFT UNIT ABOVE
LOFT UNIT ABOVE
I (NO GROUND LEVEL
(NO GROUND LEVEL
ACCESS)
I
ACCESS)
LOFT UNIT ABOVE
LOFT UNIT ABOVE
(NO GROUND LEVEL
(NO GROUND LEVEL
ACCESS)
ACCESS)
LOFT UNIT ABOVE
LOFT UNIT ABOVE
(NO GROUND LEVEL
(NO GROUND LEVEL
ACCESS)
ACCESS)
LOFT UNIT ABOVE II
•
P
--
(NO GROUND LEVEL
■ ACCESS)
LOFT UNIT ABOVE
(NO GROUND LEVEL
ACCESS)
I v 26T - 0" '
It
FLOOR PLAN -LEVEL 01
REALTY CORPORATION
m!
Merge Capital
PARK CITY SOUTH
I I I I
�'� RETAIL Al—
/� 181
RETAIL A2 ♦ 3,216 SF
3,691 SF
O 259' - 0" RESIDENTIAL
LOBBY
260' _ °„ 260, _ 9' 0 _ °„ 190
RETAIL B2 RETAIL Bl
257' - 0"
r77170 171 TRASH 0 /
1,960 SF 1,765 SF ELECTRICAL ♦ //
■ ❑ ❑ ■ 191
/
— a
-LLB—'—�— ��.�♦♦. �
CAI/ .�♦s�♦�♦�♦�
SP4.01 im e orn
It
A
JD/�VIS>

L�-- # UNITS <550S F 3 14 14 14 14 14 73
TOTAL # U NITS 36 59 59 59 59 59 330
FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 02
1Q.V\IE
REALTY CORPORATION
Merge Capital
PARK CITY SOUTH
S P4.02
22.1 %
Kimley>>>Horn J DAVIS >

FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 03
1Q.V\IE
REALTY CORPORATION
Merge Capital
PARK CITY SOUTH
SP4.03
Kimley>>>Horn J DAVIS
>

FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 04
1Q.V\IE
REALTY CORPORATION
Merge Capital
PARK CITY SOUTH
S P4.04
Kimley>>>Horn J DAVIS
>

FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 05
1Q.V\IE
REALTY CORPORATION
Merge Capital
PARK CITY SOUTH
SP4.05
Kimley>>>Horn J DAVIS
>

FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 06
1Q.V\IE
REALTY CORPORATION
Merge Capital
PARK CITY SOUTH
SP4.06
Kimley>>>Horn J DAVIS
>

FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 07
1Q.V\IE
REALTY CORPORATION
Merge Capital
PARK CITY SOUTH
SP4.07
Kimley>>>Horn J DAVIS
>

Appendix B
Grading Plan and Cut -Fill Analysis
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLVTI DNS

U
I
0
GRADING AND DRAINAGE LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
< \ \ \ I TCE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
o
I LL STORM DRAIN (> 12 INCH)
L
° \ I STORM DRAIN (< 12 INCH)
I
RD ROOF DRAIN
E l
Y \ UNDER DRAIN
o
T \ CURB AND GUTTER
o IN,\ / SPILL CURB AND GUTTER
\ss \ I CL CLEARING LIMITS
\ \ EXISTING CONTOUR
\ \ l 805 PROPOSED CONTOUR
IN, SMH
N YARD INLET �\ RIM 257.88' 826.00 SPOT ELEVATION
u TOP-263.52' \ INV IN=254.33' 8" CLAY STUB (N)
c INV IN: 261.52' 15" RCP (N) \ INy IN=254.63' 6" CLAY (SW) _ ® CATCH BASIN (CB)
INV IN: 261.23' 15" RCP (SW) V A OUT=254.28' 8" CLAY (S)
INV OUT=261.20' 18" RCP (E) \� I / SD MANHOLE (SDMH)
CURB INLET
v TOP=257.97' yi /
o SMH INV IN=255.87' 15" RCP (S) A / / -lam � CLEANOUT (SDCO)
Z Q RIM=259.01' NV IN=255.12' 18" RCP (W) / r:��
10.0' Wx 8.0' H TRI< -a INV IN=251.16' 8" CLAY (W)NV OUT=254.98' 24" RCP (E) / BARREL CULVERT ■ DROP INLET (DI)
INV OUT=251.06' 8" CLAY (SE) SMH 0) � INV=243.96'
INV=243.73'LPROPOSED INV IN=251.79' 8CA60 �N� /� \ <tcuRB wLET ��INV=243.75' � AREA DRAIN (AD)
0 p TOP=260.36' BLE JUNCTION BOX CATCH BASIN, INV OUT=251.70' 8" CLAY (E) / \< Z INV OUT=257.81' 15' RCP (N) TYP. / - - -CONTROL STRUCTURE (CS)
SS --OH�---
0 •_ - - - - _ _ REPLACE EXISTING ® FLARED END SECTION (FES)
' CATCH BASIN, t-
D' � ---OHP-----OHP ---- OHP---- -- J PROPOSED
z 31 \ CATCH BASIN WITH TYP. < J / I / Q CONCRETE HEADWALL (HW)
< 1' S SAUNDERS STREET PROPOSED STORM \ PROPOSED STORM \ \ / r \ I JUNCTION BOX / I \
0 16' CIP WATER LINE PRIMARY STREET PIPE, TYP. - PIPE, TYP. \ -1 / - - 1s" cIP
z RIA E WI H P LIC I I - \ _ - -- - - � - '� -\ - - - RD INLET -Z
/ - - RIP -RAP APRON
Q a _ - ) ^� 6 CIP � TER LI^�F. - / - CIP WATE LINE - - - - - ��5 -R� �- /
_ '�� -� FLOW ARROW
-- -=`ti= - - ---N - - 6- -f0--- `l• `l/ - - CL - - - - RCP h - -
o-�W-� -�- _ -1�� - - - - - _ -- - 1 - �M- - s - - - - - - - -W- / T- RCP E -W- -CL
a / Iva
-/ - - - / \r TW TOP OF WALL (GRADE ELEV.)
Mj ° - ------ --- - -- -- -f- I- - � 2)3-rL1''j /_r'�� b. ^ �^�--�_, �% tJ•� - -N= �c065 �' N ° p, 11 11 ° \
/ I / g` / ��c, `�'� TN=>_N -cow_ 6'cP� =�� �N- �dr rn� - s - - - - ►�- - - °D �o - - �b BW BOTTOM OF WALL (GRADE ELEV.)
> ■ ■ aJ ■ C� ° N 1 / / > - ? - �� - - - TP TOP OF PAVEMENT (GRADE ELEV.)
/ FLEX SPACE A FLEX SPACE B EX S p rp N p e ° A � .4� r \ \ \
Q N \ �i
/ _� ��/ u / /
/ n 140 160
/ / M� N -r��r �� TC TOP OF CURB (GRADE ELEV.)
l // } / / \ 2 P PEA PROPOSED 1 / ^ E: 273.17 , FFE=269.0 oMEsrl ~ram �,°�O N I ��' / 256.59 / I \
° T / / �J / 1% DOGHOUSE / N P: 272.95 FFE=271.0 I I I I WATER \ //� I ( ���� �_�____� s CO - 1i� FFE=257.0CL 257.00 ♦ < i / INv=2 s 42. 3'
/ w Fa \ CATCH BASIN \\� FFE=272.0 ■ ■ III I ■ FFE=266.0 FFE=263.0 �EiV'TRY P�AZA ` n/ FFE=258.0 ^ / / I I _
/ / I� / I / / /III TC/TP FLUSH CURB (GRADE ELEV.)
cs SMITH LLC RACE \ I \\� / ^ 0 I I \ 1 / /crRl PROPOSED STORM \ I / /� /l / I / I
L ` � / / / // / INV-241.97' WT WATER TIGHT JOINTS WT
•- 3 // PIN# 1703442339 sF. / CS SMITH LLC \� N RB5IDENTIAL / 91 S PIPE, TYP. ♦ PROPOSED ///// ( )
- \ DB 17330, PG 1278 PIN# 1703442592 III /% J LOBBY ��� ��������� - �_� c0 JUNCTION BOX,
/ \ z 3' DB 17288, PG 1501 \\ \ / oo -� REdD ♦ / SFHA
\ / RETAIL / /
0 o (1021 B S SAUNDERS STREET) 017 S SAUNDERS ST V I I I \ ) gg g G3 - - - OBBY / / / LOODWAY UNE
U _ } / I / / / Fes• 1■ 180 ` / / _ •1O� /" //
6,454 SQ. FT. N ( / / f0
\ 15,096 so. Fr. /IPROPOSED - - -
0.15 AC. 0.35 AC. c / r � AIL B2 TAIL B7
FORM MAIN ELEC 7 / / �\ SPLITTER BOX ,o�7, / N /
/ ti.0 / N \ 135 136 5.99k \ / 4f pc�i
o o 1 - - / / \ / ° / /'� L� FFE=261.0 FFE-260.0 / 75 / / / / �ha�� v�'
a / cs sMITH LLc\\ �J �p / 1 FFE=269.0 / /'� /
PIN# 1703442374 \ \\ `} ^ / /
.N t DB 17330, PG 1278 _ / J 1 ■ - \ \ PROPOSED SAND 20 PUBLIC DRAINAGE .►�._
\ // FILTER OUTLET 7 / / /
(1021 s RIDERS ST), v _ I I///EASEMENT (TYP.)
- b\ \ A * PARIS FAMILY / / / I A \ / / / �/ ' c"
4,894 SQ. FT. ROOFDRAIN
To
9 Ir / \ / / / 2 j/ /
o \\ � PARTNERSHIP LLC / / 25 �` PIPE AND / �/ / • � - ,y //� °° } �,, z '
U ( r J \ \ \ # N / TERRACEDRAIN
0.11 AC. \\ PIN 1703443412 / / / \ \ v �` r// SAND FILTER / \
DB 16872, PG 1643 J
' VA(1019 S SAUNDERS ST) �/ / �-� // N / 42.� //� / ?�1. V� / / V / / I ZfJ �l Z �S / //// �INC
-3 .RIS FAMILY \ 4' L7 >
s 5,504 SO. FT. \ D
26 ti /�� \\ \ \ / \ \ N ���°� 1 -4.93r �\ 1 \� - PROPOSED I M-o ET L/RES AURANT TERRACE / / ^ PROPOSED BUILDING / / j I j�ll
FNERSHIP LLC FQ / �^ \ 0.13 AC. I \\ f0 \ / / Frl / /
a 1703443208 // \ \\ \ \\ \ \ / % / // l �� ��
o �672, PG 1643 �S' \ \\ \ � / / \ / �// �Sg; � \ �� _SAND FILTER �% _ / , x \slcN
a > SAUNDERS sT) / / / \ \ \ \ \\\ \ /�/// �/ \ 266 / / \ 9^ / �� 42" P CONNECTION
} o
L -sob SQ. FT. \ \ \ °/ FFE=266.0 / \'' �lh ' - / //// /
0.11 AC. I �\ , / w \ Nv woos OF
\ PARIS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLC / \ \ �- ��lp �� - / / / / /
I / \ N
a a ,�A\ � PIN# 1703444408 / / �}
J DB 16872, PG 1643 5 i ■ - �� // / / } 500-YEAR /
NO \C/ (1019 17,MOUNT SO.PFT.DRIVE) 28 /LOADINH`�6 / / ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 10' PUBLIC DRAINAGE , _ % / ��1 nF2' ^ \ / / \ \ \�- \
\ ✓ / ■ / _ / / _\ TIE INTO EXISTING / / / FLOOD ELEVATION
O N \ \ PA FAMILY _ / i o.4o AC. 5 130 / - - 2g EASEMENT (TYP.) / - �J % ` / / I k
\ / / / /ii PROPOSED
\ \ PARTNERSHIP LLC / • \\ i I/ _ - - - _ -256 '"' jam. / STORMWATER PIPE ��/ / 100-YEAR FLOOD
� \ \ \\ PIN# 1703443344 ; I \\ / G - /� \ _ _ - \ \ PROPOSED �� - DOGHOUSE -_ / J \ ri \ - / / ELEVATION // \
\ DB 16872, PG 1662 ^\\ JUNCTION BOX \� I // /// // J
0 a \ (1029 S SAUNDERS ST ' L \ ?64�"p ��_ _~ �/ / ■ J / \ / TYPCTION BOX, - `
s,214 so. FT L -\ _■-� / ■ - /i' 1�0-YEAR /� 0)
LLJ AC. / / -- - \� 2 // //� > ° - - \ / h�N _ J % / i /� �V� -� / _ / 26iEVAT10 \ -/ /// (V /
263' 500-YEAR] I F
57
QI o \ \ \ \ \� �o // \- • �s, -
3 \ 20' PUBLIC DRAINAGE L Sco
/ 1 PROPOSED
I EASEMENT TYP. / TERRACE DECK /
/ LY \ \ ) // /' DRAINS TYP. \RESIDENTIAL /�// / /
P LLCM _ / / / / /� //�
Y 43285 I \ \ b'2 \ / C;' \ // �/ F \ ✓ / Jl 2 // /'
c 1643 ` \ I \ \ ( PROPOSED STORM y AMENITY / r�
DERS ST `\ ( \ I PARIS FAMILY P PIPE, \\ `� / 63 \ �j,0�a/y/ _ + SMH
3 \ \\ TYP. '20.0 j� 2 POOL DECK /// / / UNE % t � /
\ \ PIN# 17G / / x� / RIM=251.12'
0 o FT. \ \ DB 16872, PG 1662 \\ \ \ ♦ / // �// /// / �// / / / X NV IN=246.64 8" DIP (W)
m - \ 1 / 1027 S SAUNDERS \\ \ 6� \ 256 4j' /// /// / //�/ / C/ / / / �+ I NV IN:246.80 6" DIP (E)
c� - \ \ \ \\ t l \\ ( \ \ /�II '%/ /"/Nv our-246.57 8" DIP (s)
13,008 SQ. F \ 4- BHfERUOM.. .�./�/X� MH
0� A \ \ _ �6 ♦ /'��1'I(�/ i // Nv IN5248.92' 4" PVC (W)
U INV IN=248.04' 8" CLAY (�
o \ � ` PIN# 170344435125%� li 2¢/
\y PARIS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLC // \ 9\ / /// / _� / / / / �j NV OUT=247.87' 8+ (E) / \\
N m / / DB 16872, PG 1643 /� 7,� / //�/ / 10 /Y/E FL00�/ / /
O o \ (1025 S SAUNDERS ST / / /// \ �l'� N
16,467 SO. FT. 250 \ AI ■ / ■ ■ �� / / �/ %/% \ - EL ONE
/ /// / 5 0 YEAR
/ / 1 '38 AC � t j \ i �� /� FLOOD E WMON
/ SFHA
N 'U ' 1 / / / / �� FLOODWAY LINE N O
/ /// / / l 249 5a ■ ■ ■ ■ `� / / / / I \ / z_ � I
a X2 _ / //lam //`12"CPP //PROPOSED CATCH I / //// / \ /
/ / 100-YEAR FLOOD/BASIN, TYP. / I ` r / / / //// wv=246.5r//�//// � 4, / ■ I■ ■ 1� / / /// \ / / 118'-246.08' � 1 � y
o / \ ELEVATION
Q /// // /� / / / 1` / 18" CPR >c / SMH
�.a \/ , /
Y� 2 INV=243.50 NV IN=246.15' 8" DIP (N)
� RIM=251.40' �
25s P / / //// / i r l 1-1
Ld
o j// /� // i / 257' / / /// / / _
�D _ - f Nv our=246.08 a" DIP /
p3 / - 500-YEAR
__�i� I / / / / j / /// % / �� / -�- - �` / / / 18" CPR
FLOOD ELEVATION
a �J///// �77L / / I I \ / / 0 / 24 \ 7 / INV=244.38' / m
c �% // ///%� / / �// / / // J g
z .N / j // - ^ �2 / I \ \/ �o� 245-
� NRP GATEWAY PARK LP
cp
.21
� o o , PROPOS D I l 2 / / ���// // //// / / / r - - / /� / / /�\� 1 PIN# 1703448901
z " \ \ (\ / JUNCTION BOX, \ \ \ � o /i j SFHA DB 1o89a, PG 81a
\ // FLOODWAY LINE /
< o �\ \\ \\\ \ \� I \ / TYP. / / /// / // / / / �� / / / / /.� BM 2002, PG 1698
SMH (ABANDONED) a
r, RIM-249.42'"� J
\\\ \ \� \\\ \\�\\ \ I `� 100-YEAR FLOOD ' / / / // / //� / l / INV IN=245.57' 8" DIP (N)
\\~\ \ \ \ \�\�\ \ / \ /% / ice -� / ( )
NV OUT-2145.67 8" DIP NE r
Q \ \ \ �\ \\\\ \ ELEVATION
z _
FLOOD EOLEOVATION
W c \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \' \ \\�\ �' -G /
o �� \\�\ \� \� \ \ \ \ \ 2�9- - // / SMH
D \ \ \\ \
\ \\\�\ RESERVED FOR RIM=251.16
'V GREEN WAY EASEMENT _
2 6•' �/ J/ i / INV OUT 2-
\ 1 4 / PROPOSED BUILDING r (BM 2002, PG 1698)
\\\�\\\\\\\� \\\ I//// ROOF DRAIN /
o I \\\ \ \\� \ \ \� \ \�\� � PROPOSED FES \ / CONNECTION
AND RIP RAP
0
SMH
o
O c I / � \\\\RIM=248.77'
U) ° / / �\'INV IN=(FULL OF WATER) \\ \\r '\\\ / \ 1 FLOODWAYUNE
INV OUT=(FULL OF WATER) /
I \ \ TOP OF WATER: 242.77'
0ll'O BOTTOM OFF
L �
In U
\ \ \ \ \\\\ `\�" \ 00-YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION
/ "11 �\ \ \\\ \\� \ / 500-YEAR\\\ �\\\ \ \ j�� / FLOOD ELEVATION -�
0
8.0' W x 8.0, H
/ PEDESTRIAN TUNNEL
AVERAGE GRADE CALCULATIONS (S SAUNDERS STREET)
EXISTING HIGH
EXISTING LOW
AVERAGE
PROPOSED
PROPOSED LOW
AVERAGE
POINT
POINT
EXISTING
HIGHT POINT
POINT
PROPOSED
GRADE
GRADE
273.17
256.59
264.98
272.95
257.00
265.91
EXISTING AVERAGE GRADE
(MOST RESTRICTIVE)
264.88
PROPOSED AVERAGE GRADE
264.98
1
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
0 20 40 80
I- �
z z cn
W LLJ z
O
O O
U U W
� � m
0 u
N �
Z
KANT
REALTY CORPORATIO
IlVerae Caaitall
Kimley*Horn
© 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
RALEIGH, NC 27601
PHONE: [phone]
WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM
#F-0102
JDAVIS>I
cl\l
,V��'o� GO
z
I
I
I
w N
O
O O
N
C
��
�_
N
Q
m
0
LLJ
0
Q
O
w
Z
Z
Y
Y
O
<
in
<
w
V)
0
0
0
Z
0
�
Q
�
Q
Z
(D
LLJ
�
Z
CD
w
Q
Q
Q
llcll�
�(D
o
m I
m
D
0
r^
v,
�
O
LL
Q
W
U)
�0
w
0.
aLI
W
L
Z
CD
LJJ
J
Q
�
0
n
u
°1_c
SHEET NUMBER
C3.0

OHP/ / �-
/ *, oyP - / 10.0' W x 8 0' H TRIPLE
BARREL CULVERT
0/ J I - - / 7 p, `VO / / \ \ INV=243.73' INV=243. 6'
INV=243.75'
rn co L0
/O� / / / \ ��
r L 0 rn w co -
N O M sF / -- - ,`4jX / - - / i
� M r O r rn ---- N M�--
Z02 -- - oOHP------OH ----- �- OHP
--- O ---- + ----- --- --- - -- -- - - - -OH-----OHP--- + r °°AUNDEF STRE 1 r d CL d a a a 1 ° 9+00 (PRIMARYTREET) 10+00 \
11+00 12+o
\ 8 0o ARIABLE WIDT PUBLIC R/W) - -
Ov- IV�O ro 6 0 cb N O J / �� /
? / / / S4 5.1 5.0� /5 \ �° 2 / / �° /�k S �� �� �� 14
10
2 / /
7- �Fqw -1 ---IWP F
ko
cc
-41
0) \ \
/ I s
� ssD
/ 2° �ETAL FFE=269.0 JjOi \car
I,o _ II IIIIIII IIII IIII \ / f / I INS/= 42.�3
/ /PIPE !III FFE=272.o III FFE=266.0 I o- : I, �I IIIIIII �JINIIIH z5.- \
FFE=257.0 \ \ �.o /K // I INV=2r42.6
\ - II !!I. IIIIIII nnm IIIII�I� �� � � IIIIIII IIII � .IIIIII � 1
CONCRETE/ \\ I ICI - 255.00 FFE=263.o II III IIIIII IIIIIIIII IIIII d IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII,II
n FR/ME \ / \\ \ 1 III: I FFE- 272.5� pp- `� pm� r - _ /I / / lie / I
/ \ CS IT -ELc ,RACE IIII q _ I _ _ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII / IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII , �', o \ / / /� / // / / I INV=241.s7'
1703442339 I SF. v / G SMITH LLc v �v I 1 hll - \ - � I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIII' �;]IIII�11111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII ;ti / J i
PIN#3PC127 0 A\ IIII . nl' / •
DB 17330, PG 1278 23, \ / PIN 1703442592 \\\\ \„ I 1 I I/ nnl 11111111111 llll ,rlllnnnlllllllllllllllllllllW IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIP o- I � / //-i/'
/ 021 B S SAUNDERS STREET 1288, PG 1501 \ \ ;, ,I IIIIII IIIIIIIII III I ml�rl///SFHA
�(� )\FFE=259.0 / \ / / / / \^(101S SAUNDERS ST) % 1I II ! !!!!I !! I/ ♦ / / /�/ / / / / / // / LOODWAY LINE
>✓ �r45a\SQ. FT. _ _282 \ ,� ( - V ' IIIIII ulllllllll IIIII!J I 260 IIIIIIIII ... 1 �� / / / /`Y // // / �
/ \ - 15,096 SQ. FT. / v lilul IIIIIIIWn.._....1
/ r / / / a 1.., _ ..._I ..�� muii -
� o.35 AC. � �
rW1!111111 171
VI I
_`_ -- J y �I IIIIII II II IIII-
F =270.0 IIIII! nrrli�ll' /IIII ,IIIII■iml�ll f (/ / °' / / //// / /1000,
o - - - - -, s �{ �� FFE=261.0 FFE=261.0 m / j / / j / / //i / /
SMITH LLc _- \�tiA l _ / / \ / �lut I!llll �ulllllll IIIII-�inlll
PIN# 170344237�� \\ A II�I����I ' IIII!!!!!! , ....� I!!!! I!!!!!1► / / / / // / / /
�L
�\ DB 17330, PG r - =:516. p I • ill m: pnnnn, ! /
+ ~ \\ �021 S SAUNDERS' � \ \ � \\ � -QS � / r /,/ ��'' �11lII ,I -r'I � IIII �ill�Illllle � / /
�/ Y - / _
PARIS FAMILY / V A , i - - �.��_� I 1
v / 4 894 SQ. FT! \ -� / / / / / / / /
\ � / ® IIIIIII IIIli Illlllllllliial. ` /i/ � // // _ �� i// �/� //
o /
0.11 AC/ -/ \\\\\\QARTI»-�Lc__ ��� / / \� - �I�- J• / /`���
'W 4,ZO3443412 - i / / \ \ \ J !!-_ / / ® II II ��
�Bil Q-Y-2� '6- �43 278 y / r ■ ■ \ .m ��,II IIII h IIIIIIIIIIiIII►; /
IIIIIII dlllll __.....r III. .�I�IIIP�I IIII Illllllllllllilllllnl_nalll � /
= nnmlL- •, Ilr Ir V' II 1 I ""i 1 - i `i''/ / / / / / /
/ / IIIIIII Illlllllnnvnnu� nnillllllllllllllllll lill.� Ilellla�l!! _ un 1111111111l�!!lIa1.9------ / /
/ „ m m m m m m m nri m ,�gllrrn/nr ns lu III m.,• \ I
\ \ \ s �6 � � � \ ^ / �; � \, , ■I \ - - IIIII•;II �- IIIIIl1111l�111!lIIIIlIIIIl111111111111111lllllllllluill�lllll,l� � •�Ililrllillll� / ///
RI FA ILV Sh o� - \ \ `S,�$,SQL\\ \ ^ / \ "� $ �
\ � � �� II m ll Illllllllllllllllllllllllllllhlli,nlil�llllllllllllll�llilllll � - IIIIV/ � / / /.� � � / � / �. ( I
\E� sHI\ L c / / \ \ \3��\ \\ J \ J 4.94 �IIIIIIIIIII'Illlllllll�illlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllAlllllllPl' ,Illy.,. \ (+�. / �' / ///i� m
1703443 _ IIIIIIIIIII �► -- / / �,� / //i
872, �G 43 \ oo // / \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ / / SIGN /
/ J II
SAUNC�ERS\ S f \ / \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ //� 6.5 ® /�
/ / IIIIIIIIIIIIIIVIIIII / / //� ✓ / %//// / / + I
\�, / \ \ \ \ \ \�' \ \ \\ \ /j/ _ / � � � / � Illlllllallll:iil - ,..._ - � � / //i/ /i /
I \ \ \\ // /� I I - "91111�E••� - .� /// \ Zg5' //�///� / �� �i// / ROW OF
>p6 SO. T. \\,e\��IJ �k�ERSHIP LLc I- =266.0 ,�__ ; / 15 J `f - - \ i� / ( /�/ //// l wooD PosT /
11 AC.� 1
V.`���S�F44408 N - - �±E / � II I Vic/ /�� � l
PG 1643 LJ / / / 2s / / \ \ \/ / /�%// / J / 500-YEAR \
/ \ \ �n9 f � _. ` // /� / / / / �` -- FLOOD ELEVATION
vUNT HOPE DR�VE � �� ��
' \
/ 17,228 SQ. FT. /
�\\\\ ) �$ 0 _ _, 1 '1� � I_ J 1 � -ice/%� / � 2S / \\� \ �\/ �i \ i-
\\\ ( P�A� 1 FAMIL /' \\\\ \ 0.40 AC. -
\ PARERSHIP L`�C \\ \ / / i//\ �� �/ \ /� / I / /2 / / \ \ / / 100-YEAR FLOODIN7034433 4 // \ ///�/ l /
DID 1 872, PG 1 62 ELEVATION /
\ \\ \ 029 SAUNDER ST
\ \ ( ( ) I I 2g sue\ - / �� / ✓/ /// /
I �\ / 100-YEAR FL
\ \ , A 4 SQ. F L / L _26AS� \ \ I o '^ ���1`.
\ \ - •siii �.. / - %� ii/ / i _ ` I ELEVATION
\ \ \ \\\ 12 A C. / - 263 -
�500-EAR
\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \� / / \ \ `I. � •.��� � ���♦ �f � � _ 2 � _ - - - _ -FtOAB-ELC�i,�ilON
pm„
\ 262 T
� I L Y \ \ I ! / / \ � / � � � ( .♦ ♦....� / /� // / / /� i � � D� �' // LLC
'00,//
43 85 \ \
$ l I I \ � A �� 1 ( -�O � /- = � v vI I � � � ' � �� � FFE= 26 3.0 pios�Y:>• � _
�\ \ PA IS f1AMIL`(/PARTI OAS IP/L \\ \ \ I � � / 25 / / / FLOOD -
D E R S \S T) \ 1 \ \\\ 1 I `b %� \ \ • ®®���������������<�'' / // /
PIN 1703441+/ \ \\ - -� ♦.♦ i.��.�•� ////�/ // / _ LINE
�1 a Wig
T. \ 1 I D 1 q 872,A G /�j F Y \ \\\ " 0�000:�00. 000;"; �s°•o
\ \ \ \ \ f \\ \ 07 S A'U N` ///
\ � \\ 1 / \ - / FFE= 26 4.0 ••i'®`i000' �✓ OO�i .000s' `�1' / // / / / �o
� 1 � \ \ 1 1 I \ 1, \ �\ \ I / / �/ / � I' � •.••,9s33::�3i,:•�'►:,•�, / 111 �/ /i ,- � /�, � �/ / / - � \ I
\ / PIN.o# 17t34)4311
P�R�SI F/WILY AR NER HIP LI[C /(�// / 1 - �, - _ - • O 2 / \ �i i
%/ / D� 16 72, G 1643 / '�! / / / II'rr'*1� •� / / /// /j/
lot A) // //// �A ! �� r / ///// // i \ ELg;A EAR FLOOCY / -
/ / I \16,V 6 7 S Q. F7,
/
/ - --- / //
Cy.3 AC./ // j///�//// // / / 1 II - TII.1 '"� ` , Q / i ///�/ //� / FL(�DD ELF1A'fION ^
�� �� 5b0-YEAR /
// /i _
/ . / /�/ \ "\ // 7► \/ X� SFHA o n
////// r1 J ❑� .. / /�l / \ L
11� � � / \ � \ \ / r / ` -+ ' /- �� FLOODWAY LINE N � 0
I
249 - /
4_ \
/// /
%i� cif �F �Y //// / - - - - �I}o/ / I / /�
/ /
/ /// /// //// �// / j \ - 100-YEAR FLOOD /
/ / / / / / / - - - J . I - -� / / /� k _-- ELEVATION
l /l//11
- 247- /5`11� c� /;Xf�
-' - - - / /
- / / / / FLOOD ELEVATION
,` -� - /l/ / / � 500-YEAR
�_//�j - -J\\\/ l // ��
/ / _/� / / / 20
/
J I �; I S� ///�/ // /� / /'/NRP GATEWAY PARK LP
/ / // o PIN 198, PC 901
SFHA
/ / BM 2002, PC 1698 /
818
FLOODWAY LINE \/
\ \ \ \
\\ \\ \\\\41100-YEAR FL
ELEVATION
// / /
500-YEAR
\\\\\\\ \\\\\ \\\ \ \ \ \ I -251� �// ///
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ FLOOD ELEVATION \ / / �
\ \ \ \ \ \\\ \\ \\ \ \\I -- \ \ \ \ \ I / / � ,
250-�� ���/ /
\\\\� \ // 0 j
I
I
/
a \ \\\ \ \\� \ \\\ `\ \ \ \ �• \ \249 /
RESERVED FOR
� 1-1
\ 24 -- jL f
\\ \\ \\ \ �\ \ \ ` / \ �24 8 J ky, / GREENWAY EASEME
\� NT\ /
\\\� ��/246�' (BM 2002, PG 1698) /
I \\\ \�\\\\\\\\ \ \�/ 1
pA / 1
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
/ \ \ SFHA
��� \�\\� �\\\\\ , \\\\ / /� / I
\\� \\\\\\\\\ \ \\\ / / I % FLOODWAY LINE 0 15 30 60
� ' /
/ I yc°/vrRI�NST Cut/+'i'il Summary
\`may \ \ � N a� Cut Factor Fill Factor 2d Area Cut Fill Net
/ I % \XN
N\� � t''�'�\\ \�\ \\\` 1 I EARTHWORKS 1.000 1.000 4.00acres 2234.45 Cu. Yd. 14789.38 Cu. Yd. / 12554.93 Cu. Yd.<Fill>
100-YEAR FLOOD Totals 4.00acres 2234.45 Cu. Yd. 14789.38 Cu. Yd. 12554.93 Cu. Yd.<Fill>
/ l
1-1
Elevations Table
Number
Minimum Elevation
Maximum Elevation
Area
Color
1
-6.36
-1.53
24585.59
2
-1.53
-0.25
17802.32
3
-0.25
0.04
10714.13
4
0.04
0.32
13966.08
5
0.32
0.74
13599.80
6
0.74
1.74
24970.74
7
1.74
3.85
32409.96
0
8
3.85
11.18
34961.73
E/

Appendix C
Utility Plan
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLVTI DNS

UTILITY LEGEND �_ m
o \ N N
o \ - - PROPERTY LINE \ �
Q `\ WATER LINE \ \ o
\ \ I 0O 0
FW FIRE LINE
E \
o \ SANITARY SEWER LINE
A A E ELECTRIC
E ` SMH
V YARD INLET \ RIM=257.88' FO FIBER OPTIC
o TOP RCP ( ) INV IN-254.33' 8" CLAY STUB (N)
'INV IN: 261.52' 15" RCP (N) � IN IN=254.63' 6" CLAY (SW) � � G GAS � �
INV IN: 261.23' 15" RCP (SW) A I OUT=254.28' 8" CLAY (S) z Z (n
INV OUT=261.20' 18" RCP (E)
CURB INLET \ P POWER LLJ LLJ z
: O
TOP=257.97' `SS\ -OHP T TELECOMMUNICATION � U)
O
RIM=259.01' INV IN=255.12' 18" RCP (W) Hp - � \ �� 10.0' W x 8.0' H TRIPLE O O W
INV IN=251.16' 8" CLAY (W) NV OUT=254.98' 24" RCP (E) BARREL CULVERT TV CABLE
INV=243.96'
0 INV OUT=251.06' 8" CLAY (SE) SMH / A \ INV=243.73 �
GATE RIM=260.37' �--L,,_�--� LIGHT POLE U U
8" TAPPING SLEEVE VALVE CURB INLET INV IN=251.79' 8" CLAY (N) / \� \ INV=243.75' I__f I__I
TOP=260.36' INV OUT=251.70' 8" CLAY (E)
AND VALVE TYP.) (TYP.) INV OUT-257.81' 15' RCP (N) / �� A V -m WATER METER
- - - - - - ] --- ----oHPI - oHP
f P--OHP ----- 8" TAPPING SLEEVE ' '
P 6 TAP_ GATE VALVE
AND VALVE (TYP.)
PUBLIC FIRE 8" TAPPING GATE TIE INTO CORPUD SS/ C / / E 5 POINT OF CONNECTION
S SAUNDERS STREET HYDRANT 4" WATER SERVICE SLEEVE AND VALVE VALVE I EX. SSWR EASEMENT (TYP.) SSWR MANHOLE
(TYP.) METER TYP. TYP. - - - 1s" CIP - / / BACKFLOW PREVENTOR o
0 5" CIP WATER LINE PRIMARY STREET - (TYP.) 1" IRRIGATION -� - - - _ - - - -MANHOLE I c RB INLET (TYP.) - - _ - �{ - / m N z
Q -(VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC R/W 1s" cIP WATER LINE - - - - - - - - -- -- -METER (TYP. - - - - _ _/-sr6s = _ _ - -
_ ) - - - - - - - INN 250.55' 18" RCP (S) PRIVATE FIRE / / I1 Imo' I-� I=I I�I PIPE TEE/BENDS
- - - - - _
----- - --- - -- --- - - = HYDRANT (TYP.)
0 _---W------ =-Y(�= - --- - - ---- --- - -- 24 Rc - --
- - - _ - - -- - - -- - - - - - I05505 0' - 6F RCP E R
L .�- � - - - I �- - E REDUCER
-
o - - a - �- --- °_� ° 4" DIP WATER 1 IRRIGATION _ ° ° FIRE HYDRANT
GAT
---- - - - -
_------- ------ -- +_ -'- - - SERVICE N
- cep ° � � � � S p, -VALVE Y (FH)
LINE D 6" DIP ° ° °a $� . ° ' (TYP.) -
GRAVEL ® _ , - 3 ■ ■ . FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC)
- I o FIRE LINE > ° c1+ -
FLEXSPACEA FLEX SPACE B FLEX SPACE C ° 5 REALTY CORPORATION
Y _ _ n 8' DIP WATER ° I 1ao so so D. - ° > °
KANE
T 11 = \ LINE (TYP.) C OMESTI1GREASE D \® SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT (SSCO)
2 METAL �-1 �,. FDC FOR WATER PUBLIC FIRE _ 8" PVC SSWR / ' INV=242.23' �.
o \ \ INTERCEPTOR__ (i INV=242.62'
b o 8" DIP - PIPE TYP. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SSMH
o � o � PARKING iss HYDRANT (TYP.) � � ( ) / ® ( )
z ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ FIRE LINE ■ (TYP.) SANITARY SEWER REIAILAI
ONCRETE w n FagM` I DECK I a,
a CS SMITH LLC RAGE V ■ ■ I (TYP.) 0 INV=241.97' ® SANITARY SEWER GREASE TRAP ��� a ita
PIN# 1703442339 SF. (5L CS SMITH LLC �� RESIDENTIAL CLEAN OUT TYP.
o De n33o, PG 1278 PI 17o3442s92 \ I ° FDC FOR 1" IRRIGATION RPDA (AMES = -
2.3 ({� DB 17288, PG 1501 RESID RETAILA2 ♦ / / 8" RPDA (AMES MAXIM
021 B s sauvDERs STREET) APARTMENTS SFHA
(1017 s sauvDERs sr) \ ° MAXIM LF500) BACKFLOW - LOBBY 80 - / / LF500) BACKFLOW LOODWAY LINE
0 6 F- 15, 0 3s SO.
FT. e AND -DETAIL 4"RPDA (AMES MAXIM PRE\\\\\�IIN BUILDING RETAIL RETAIL BI 90 / / / / / 0, / / / / GROUNDPREVENER IN HEATED ENCLOSURE
STANDARD UTILITY NOTES (AS APPLICABLE )
\\/ I PREVENTERFW00 IN BUILDING LF500) (AMES
OW ■ ■ ° ■ ■TRASH ♦ / / 1. ALL MATERIALS & CONSTRUCTION METHODS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF Kimley*Horn
\ \oyQ FORMER MAIN36LEC ) 8" RPDA AMES MAXIM / / �� / RALEIGH DESIGN STANDARDS, DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS (REFERENCE: CORPUD
o ° ■ / HANDBOOK, CURRENT EDITION .
PREVENTER WITHIN BUILDING / / ' ) © 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
I / / / / ` �� I : 421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 600
SMITH LLC �y RALEIGH, NO 27601
� ° no3442374 \ } � 3 ° ■ ♦ ♦ / � o / / / / '�% = 2. UTILITY SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS:
�30, PG 1278
SAUNDERS Sr \ I ° / / / 5� / / �/ (`o f A) A DISTANCE OF 100' SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN SANITARY SEWER & ANY PHONE: [phone]
Q )° PARIS FAMILY ' r ■ ■ 2 X 8" PVC ■ // ' 100, z (� PRIVATE OR PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SOURCE SUCH AS AN IMPOUNDED RESERVOIR www.KIMLEY-HORN.coM
4 S0. FT. PARTNERSHIP LLC SSWR PIPE c #F-0102
.11 AC. \ I / / / I / USED AS A SOURCE OF DRINKING WATER. IF ADEQUATE LATERAL SEPARATION CANNOT
CL PIN# 1703443412 / �e TYP. `� ° C BE ACHIEVED, FERROUS SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE SPECIFIED & INSTALLED TO
/ DB 16872, PG 1643 \ GREASE INTERCEPTOR (TYP.), ■ ( ) / / F 30' CORPUD SS ° +
o (1019 S SAUNDERS ST) / 42.0' CONNECTION TO BE I ■ / / / ? WATERLINE SPECIFICATIONS. HOWEVER, THE MINIMUM SEPARATION SHALL NOT BE LESS
s• O` � _ ?I - � "'� EASMENT (TYP.) � /
+zs• COORDINATED WITH PLUMBING '�� / 5� SFHA I < THAN 25' FROM A PRIVATE WELL OR 50' FROM A PUBLIC WELL.
5,504 SQ. FT. FLOODWAY
Fo 0.13 AC. o. I RETAIL/RESTAURANT TERRACE / . / + I I-j"� cul B) WHEN INSTALLING WATER &/OR SEWER MAINS, THE HORIZONTAL SEPARATION
0 _ ass' ' / 10.5 SEPARATION BETWEEN \ / TOE BETWEEN UTILITIES SHALL BE 10'. IF THIS SEPARATION CANNOT BE MAINTAINED DUEJDAVIS>
o ° / 8" DIP WATER / °� / ■--- ---_- = / WATER AND STORM-'/ o SIGN IN,, TO EXISTING CONDITIONS, THE VARIATION ALLOWED IS THE WATER MAIN IN A
LINE (TYP.) I _ D / 42' SiuP / / / of SEPARATE TRENCH WITH THE ELEVATION OF THE WATER MAIN AT LEAST 18"ABOVE
NV 46.90'
/ ° / ROW OF x / THE TOP OF THE SEWER & MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DIRECTOR.
r,r PARTNERSHIP LLC / UTIL ■ �N \ / / S I
� � PARIS FAMILY
/ PIN# 1703444408 / ° _ 131L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - / \ / / WOOD POST. ALL DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM OUTSIDE DIAMETER TO OUTSIDE DIAMETER.
° -172, PG 1643 ■ C WHERE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PROPER SEPARATION, OR ANYTIME A SANITARY
IT HOPE DRIVE) LOADING ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ \ PRIVATE FIRE OGHOUSE FLOOD
)
/ CORPUD UTILITY \ / , \ / �� FLOOD ELEVATION / \ SEWER PASSES OVER A WATERMAIN, DIP MATERIALS OR STEEL ENCASEMENT EXTENDED
o so. FT. TRASH MANHOLE
� PARIS r EASEMENT (TYP.) Ac. / � / � � HYDRANT (TYP.) � / l 10' ON EACH SIDE OF CROSSING MUST BE SPECIFIED &INSTALLED TO WATERLINE
PARTNER`_ LLc , / / 30 ■ l// \ '< SPECIFICATIONS.
PIN 1703443344 - - /` � � � / � 100-YEAR FLOOD /
# ` ELEVATION 1 D) 5.0' MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN ALL SANITARY SEWER
m 0 DB 16872, PG 1662 / ■ �- FW 36" FES J
- 1029 S SAUNDERS ST ■ ■ ° / &STORM SEWER FACILITIES, UNLESS DIP MATERIAL IS SPECIFIED FOR SANITARY SEWER. �G
� j > WATER `' INV=242.88/
4 / A ■ ■ � T, 10O-YEAR FLOC-/ / -� E) MAINTAIN 18"MIN. VERTICAL SEPARATION AT ALL WATERMAIN & RCP STORM DRAIN
s,20112SO. cFT. /\ I / / / s a ° - TY LINE (TYP.) ELEVATION �/ CROSSINGS; MAINTAIN 24"MIN. VERTICAL SEPARATION AT ALL SANITARY SEWER & RCP
° o / \ I y, / / �✓ D -VC\\, M 500-YEAR EX. SSWR /� / \ +/ STORM DRAIN CROSSINGS. WHERE ADEQUATE SEPARATIONS CANNOT BE ACHIEVED,
/ \ / ■ ■ / FLOOD ELEVATION (TYP.), /� SPECIFY DIP MATERIALS & A CONCRETE CRADLE HAVING 6"MIN. CLEARANCE (PER
Lo _
a- PUBLIC FIRE L_ / / / ° %� / 5/ / / / CORPUD DETAILS W-41 & S-49).
HYDRANT (TYP.) - / ° ♦ // /5 / / + F) ALL OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL CROSS WATER & SEWER FACILITIES WITH
T e/ ♦ RESIDENTIAL i � F.N / / / / 18"MIN. VERTICAL SEPARATION REQUIRED.
0 8" RPDA (AMES MAXIM I I I ° �\ AMENITY / SFHA
° LF500) BACKFLOW I -� POOL DECKS // FLOODWAY / / / / / SMH 3. ANY NECESSARY FIELD REVISIONS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW & APPROVAL OF AN AMENDED
�. A\ POOL OUTLET, LINE / �s X RIM=251.12' z O O m
PREVENTER IN ABOVE I ♦ \\\\\\ / / / /5`' / / �X INV IN=246.64 8" DIP (W) PLAN &/OR PROFILE BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO m m O
■ ♦ MAX. DISCHARGE / H H O
•E o' GROUND HEATED ENCLOSURE I I ♦ / � / / / \ INv IN:246.80 6" DIP (E) � CONSTRUCTION. O � N O
\I I I �� 50 GPM / �/ r y \ NV OUT=246.57 8" DIP (S) � N O =
\ 13,008 s F I WATER 30.0' BIKE ROOM �� / MH \ 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN CONTINUOUS WATER & SEWER SERVICE TO EXISTING O w N
o A� 0.30 y RIM=255.42' m >-
\\D "LINE (TYP.) I ' 0 �� i INV IN=24a.92' 4" PVC (w) RESIDENCES &BUSINESSES THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT. ANY NECESSARY Q Q > m
NV IN=248.04' 8" CLAY SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS SHALL BE PRECEDED BY A 24 HOUR ADVANCE NOTICE TO THE o N o m o
Q �# no3444351 I I _ GATE / ( w w
11LY PARTNERSHIP LLC �j NV OUT=247.87' a' (E) CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. \ z z
° 16872, PG 1643 30' CORPUD SS I I / VALVE Cr P w Y
S SAUNDERS ST) GATE VALVE TYP. 100-YEAR FLOOD / ✓ Y O Q Q U Q w
_ EASEMENT (TYP.) I TYP. ( ) ELEVATION / / / / 5. 3.0' MINIMUM COVER IS REQUIRED ON ALL WATER MAINS & SEWER FORCEMAINS. 4.0' 0 LLw m =
v 6,467 S0. FT. I A ■ (TYP.) ■ /
PRIVATE FIRE 500-YEAR / " \ MINIMUM COVER IS REQUIRED ON ALL REUSE MAINS.
0.38 AC. \ 8" PVC SSWR / V
FLOOD ELEVATION\ HYDRANT / /_SFHA o ➢ 6. IT IS THE DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ABANDON OR REMOVE EXISTING WATER &
PIPE (TYP.) / - y`� FLOODWAY LINE N r� O
■ ■ ■ ■ / �A SEWER SERVICES NOT BEING USED IN REDEVELOPMENT OF A SITE UNLESS OTHERWISE
o / / zc DIRECTED BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. THIS INCLUDES
PRIVATE FIRE / � �` 12" CPR N w , m ABANDONING TAP AT MAIN &REMOVAL OF SERVICE FROM ROW OR EASEMENT PER
o HYDRANT TYP. / `� 18" CPP Nv=246.51' � z
100-YEAR FLOOD �o / ti I ■ : ■) ■ F� � // / 100-YEAR FLOOD CORPUD HANDBOOK PROCEDURE.
/ INV=246.08' MH
It 0 ELEVATION SSWR MANHOLE / / 18" CPR k SMH ELEVATION
a / / / - 7. INSTALL 4" DIP WATER SERVICES WITH METERS LOCATED AT ROW OR WITHIN A 2'X2'
500-YEAR / (TYP.) yf INV=243.` RIM= =240'
o o P / wv w=z46.1s' 6" DIP (N) WATERLINE EASEMENT IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT. NOTE: IT IS THE APPLICANT'S
FLOOD ELEVATION / / INV our=246.oa 8" oIP (s) RESPONSIBILITY TO PROPERLY SIZE THE WATER SERVICE FOR EACH CONNECTION TO
w ° / / / / a I I 8" DIP WATER / / PROVIDE ADEQUATE FLOW & PRESSURE.
o Q / / �. - I I 10.5' / LINE (TYP.) / ��� / .� / / 500-YEAR
/ / 8" CPP / oti FLOOD ELEVATION
10.5' SEPARATION BETWEEN 0
\ / / o / / �� N" 78, / / / ' 8. INSTALL 8" PVC SEWER SERVICES ® 1.0% MINIMUM GRADE WITH CLEANOUTS LOCATED AT
Q ° �\ WATER AND STORM I I / // ROW OR EASEMENT LINE & SPACED EVERY 50 LINEAR FEET MAXIMUM.
_ /. - - Y o r 7
/ / �j ,�'>i/ z / 9. PRESSURE REDUCING VALVES ARE REQUIRED ON ALL WATER SERVICES EXCEEDING 80 PSI;
NRP GATEWAY PARK LP / BACKWATER VALVES ARE REQUIRED ON ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES HAVING BUILDING Q
PIN# 1703448901 DRAINS LOWER THAN 1.0'ABOVE THE NEXT UPSTREAM MANHOLE.
/ SFHA q DB 10898, PG 818
\ / / \ M / / FLOODWAY UNE / / Ai BM 2002, PG 1698 J
o EX. SSWR / \ / / SMH (ABANDONED) / / 10. ALL ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM
N \� PIPE (TYP.) `� \ �/ RIM-249.42' NCDWQ, USACE &/OR FEMA FOR ANY RIPARIAN BUFFER, WETLAND &/OR FLOODPLAIN Z / = INV IN=245.57' 8" DIP (N) r IMPACTS (RESPECTIVELY) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. `�
O o a.
100-YEAR FLOOD
NV OUT=2145.67 8" DIP (NE) �� I
ELEVATION
N oo \ 500-YEAR / / / 11. NCDOT / RAILROAD ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR ANY UTILITY WORK 5
L k FLOOD ELEVATION I / (INCLUDING MAIN EXTENSIONS & SERVICE TAPS) WITHIN STATE OR RAILROAD ROW PRIOR G
TO CONSTRUCTION.
SMH /
RESERVED FOR 12. GREASE INTERCEPTOR / OIL WATER SEPARATOR SIZING CALCULATIONS & INSTALLATION
GREEN WAY EASEMENT RIM-251.16'
/ \ INV IN=241.96' 8" DIP (NW) / SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CORPUD FOG PROGRAM COORDINATOR PRIOR w
.� / \� (BM zoo2, PG 1698) 1> INV OUT-241.85 8" DIP (SE) TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. CONTACT TIM BEASLEY AT [phone] OR
[e-mail] FOR MORE INFORMATION.
/
o ` 13. CROSS -CONNECTION CONTROL PROTECTION DEVICES ARE REQUIRED BASED ON DEGREE OF
HEALTLIC
Q o a / / / / l WATER H SYSTEMS IN HAZARD INVOLVED
CAROL NEA..THESE GUIDELIND IN ES
ARE THE MINIMUM F THE RULES OEREQUIREMRNING EN S.
E \ a
THE DEVICES SHALL MEET AMERICAN SOCIETY OF SANITARY ENGINEERING (ABBE) C�
>- a SMH a ya \ / / /- STANDARDS OR BE ON THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA APPROVAL LIST. THE z
RIM=248.77' \� a a DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND TESTED (BOTH INITIAL AND PERIODIC TESTING
_J INV IN -(FULL OF WATER) I / FLOODWAY LINE
° INV OUT=(FULL OF WATER) \ a THEREAFTER) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS OR THE
o \ TOP of WATER-242.77' I a a `\ LOCAL CROSS -CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM, WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT. CONTACT
o S BorroM of Box:24o.27' a / JOANIE HARTLEY AT [phone] OR JOANIE.HARTLEY@RALEIGHNC. GOV FOR MORE
/ \ O,9V�S a aN41/ �� / INFORMATION.
0 / a i
o
0 <
O � M
0 � , 100-YEAR FLOOD W 0 W
c
/ ELEVATION /
--\\� 500-YEAR ((( � )
FLOOD ELEVATION �/ /
0
Q w LLJ
/ 8.0' Wx8.0'H / a
Q a � / / / PEDESTRIAN TUNNEL /
CD
/ O w
5 -5 �y' // I
\ / _
5 / / \ \ Q 0
NO TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENCROACHMENTS (INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO CLEARING GRADING FENCING AND THE
� � GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET �
�� / / / INSTALLATION OF RETAINING WALLS OR OTHER STRUCTURES) 0 20 40 80 U
ARE PERMITTED WITHIN THE GREENWAY EASEMENT AREA
u / 10.0' W x 8.O' H TRIPL / \ I WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH. SHEET NUMBER
-0 / J* / BARREL CULVERT 7 \ `l
U \
o�C4.0
CL