HomeMy WebLinkAboutWS-96272_96937_CA_IAR_20230131
P.O. Box 16265 • Greensboro, NC 27416
503 Industrial Ave • Greensboro, NC 27406
Phone (336)335-3174 • Fax (336)691-0648 • Toll Free (866)545-9507
Email: Info@pyramidenvironmental.com
www.pyramidenvironmental.com
January 31, 2023
Mr. Cameron Clubb
Buck’s Wrecker Service
5007 Ball Park Road
Thomasville, NC 27360
Email : wbclubb11@gmail.com
RE: Spill Cleanup Report / Initial Assessment Report
Highway I‐85 South (Exit 84) near Linwood, Davidson County, NC 27299
Spill Location: N. Lat. 35.739756°/ W. Long ‐80.365408°
Responsible Party: NBX Logistics, Inc.
9555 Armelle Way
Jacksonville, FL 32257‐8897
NCDEQ Incident # Pending
Pyramid #2023‐027
Mr. Clubb:
As requested by Buck’s Wrecker Service, Pyramid Environmental and Engineering, P.C.,
(Pyramid) has completed the environmental services for the diesel fuel spill cleanup on the side
of I‐85 south near exit 84 in Linwood, Randolph County, North Carolina. The work included soil
screening, contaminated soil excavation supervision, soil sampling, laboratory analyses for
petroleum, regulatory and data evaluation, and spill cleanup reporting
1.0 Tractor Trailer Accident
On the afternoon of January 17, 2022 a box truck carrying Pine Glo cleaning products swerved
into a guardrail and then off the side of I‐85 Southbound near Exit 84. The truck flipped over
spilling the contents releasing approximately 50 gallons of diesel fuel. During the accident
approximately 400 gallons of Pine Glo Ocean Antibacterial & Disinfectant Cleaner was spilled.
The majority of the spilled diesel fuel collected in a ditch on the northwest side of I‐85 south.
The affected area was an elongated area between the ditch and the road which measured
approximately 102 feet long and 10 to 20 feet wide. The location of the spill is shown on the
figures included in Attachment A.
Buck’s Wrecker Services – Spill Cleanup on I‐85 South Near Exit 84, Linwood, NC page 2
Pyramid Environmental Project # 2023‐027 Jan. 31, 2023
2.0 Spill Cleanup Planning
On January 17, 2023, Buck’s Wrecker Services responded to the accident and immediately
removed the box truck, cleaned the road surface, and applied granular petroleum absorbent
material to the spill along the shoulder of the road. On January 17, 2023 Buck’s Wrecker
Services contacted Pyramid Environmental & Engineering, P.C. (Pyramid) to provide
environmental services including soil screening, soil sampling, laboratory analyses of soil, and
spill cleanup reporting.
The wreck occurred on a Tuesday afternoon, and the NCDOT would not approve a lane closure
for I‐85 south the same day. Buck’s arranged the lane closure for 9:00 am on January 18, 2023
to allow cleanup work on the side of the road in I‐85 southbound near Exit 84.
At 8:00 on January 18, 2023, Pyramid mobilized to the site to assess the extent of the spill area
and help Buck’s excavate the contaminated soil at the site. Buck’s Wrecker Service arranged for
the roll‐off containers, the lane closure, and provided the equipment for the soil excavation.
Pyramid screened soils in the spill area to determine the boundaries of the spill and collected
soil samples for laboratory analyses. The petroleum analyses were completed using Ultraviolet
Fluorescence (UVF) analyses at RedLab, in Wilmington, NC.
3.0 Spill Excavation, Soil Sampling, & Soil Analytical Results
On January 18, 2023, Buck’s Wrecker Service and Pyramid coordinated to excavate the
petroleum contaminated soil. The contaminated soil in the spill area was excavated and loaded
into three roll‐off containers. The soil was sent to AES of NC, LLC disposal facility in Thomasville,
NC for treatment and disposal. Selected photos taken before and during the spill cleanup
activities are included in Attachment B. The following tasks were performed before and during
the excavation of contaminated soil:
Prior to start of work, Buck’s Wrecker Services coordinated emergency utility locating
and traffic control (lane closure) activities. Most of the spill was located in a ditch near
the side of the road. Photos of the spill area on the side of the road on I‐85 southbound
are shown on the photos included in Attachment B.
Pyramid screened the surface soils in the visibly stained area and determined the aerial
extent of the petroleum impacts to surficial soils in the spill area. A copy of the Standard
Procedures used by Pyramid is include in Attachment C.
Buck’s Wrecker Services – Spill Cleanup on I‐85 South Near Exit 84, Linwood, NC page 3
Pyramid Environmental Project # 2023‐027 Jan. 31, 2023
Pyramid collected three pre‐excavation soil samples (Spill Composite Sample/Disposal
Sample – DS‐1 DS‐2 and DS‐3) from the most contaminated areas of the spill. DS‐1 was
saturated with Pine Glo. The analytical results for sample DS‐1 through DS‐3 detected
high concentrations of diesel range organics (DRO) of 4332 milligrams per kilogram
(mg/kg) and elevated concentrations of gasoline range organics (GRO) of 2,750 mg/kg.
Copies of the RedLab laboratory report and associated chain‐of‐custody form are
included in Attachment D.
The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) initial cleanup action
levels are 50 mg/kg for GRO and 100 mg/kg for DRO. Pyramid personnel collected soil
samples for field screening using a calibrated Photoionization Detector (PID) as the
excavation proceeded. The field screening was used to guide the excavation width,
length, and depth.
The soil near the roadway and in the dich was hard packed in most areas and the diesel
spill did not soak in beyond a depth of 6‐10 inches.
The contaminated soils were removed first from the wreck site, where most of the
petroleum spill occurred. The soil was removed to a depth of about 8‐inches over most
of the area, and to a depth of 12 inches where the truck flipped over.
On January 18, 2023, three roll‐of containers were loaded with approximately 29.51
tons of petroleum contaminated soil from the spill area. The soil was contained and
covered in the lined roll‐off containers. The soil was initially staged by Buck’s Wrecker
Service pending laboratory analyses.
After completion of the contaminated soil excavation, soil samples were collected from
the limits of the excavation and screened with the PID. The soil sample PID screening
results for the post‐excavation samples ranged from 0.7 to 2.0 ppm.
The majority of the post‐excavation soil samples were collected from the center of the
excavation, which was between 6‐inches and 10 inches deep.
The names and locations of soil samples are shown in Figure #2 in Attachment A. A summary
of the GRO and DRO soil sample analytical results are provided in Table 1 below.
Buck’s Wrecker Services – Spill Cleanup on I‐85 South Near Exit 84, Linwood, NC page 4
Pyramid Environmental Project # 2023‐027 Jan. 31, 2023
Table 1
UVF Analytical Results
Sampling
Date
Sample
ID
Sample Depth
(below land surface)
Sample
PID Reading
GRO
[mg/kg]
DRO
[mg/kg]
01/18/23 DS‐1 (Pine Glo)
pre‐excavation sample
Composite
(Pine Glo)
14 ppm <0.39 0.91
01/18/23 DS‐2
pre‐excavation sample
Composite
(Diesel)
110 ppm 2750 4332
01/18/23 DS‐3
pre‐excavation sample
Composite
(Diesel)
230 ppm 1538 2721
01/18/23 SS1 6 in. 0.7 ppm <0.58 0.58
01/18/23 SS2 6 in. 1.6 ppm <0.31 <0.31
01/18/23 SS3 6 in. 1.3 ppm <0.3 2.1
01/18/23 SS4 6 in. 0.9 ppm <0.33 <0.33
01/18/23 SS5 6 in. 0.9 ppm <0.31 0.31
01/18/23 SS6 6 in. 2.0 ppm <0.36 <0.36
01/18/23 SS7 6 in. 1.2 ppm <0.35 <0.35
01/18/23 SS8 10 in. 1.0 ppm <0.32 <0.32
01/18/23 SS9 6 in. 1.3 ppm <0.31 <0.31
01/18/23 SS10 6 in. 0.6 ppm <0.29 <0.29
01/18/23 SS11 6 in. 1.2 ppm <0.3 <0.3
01/18/23 SS12 6 in. 1.1 ppm <0.28 0.36
01/18/23 SS13 6 in. 1.0 ppm <0.31 1.9
01/18/23 SS14 6 in. 1.1 ppm <0.29 0.68
NCDEQ Cleanup Levels [mg/kg] 50 100
* ppm = parts per million * mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
The soil analytical results for DRO concentrations for all post‐excavation samples are
below 2.1 mg/kg, which is below the NCDEQ Action Level of 100 mg/kg for diesel range
organics in soil.
The soil analytical results for GRO concentrations for all post‐excavation samples are
below <0.58 mg/kg, which is below the NCDEQ Action Level of 50 mg/kg for gasoline
range organics in soil.
Buck’s Wrecker Services – Spill Cleanup on I‐85 South Near Exit 84, Linwood, NC page 6
Pyramid Environmental Project # 2023‐027 Jan. 31, 2023
Attachments:
Attachment A: Figures
Attachment B: Selected Photos of the Cleanup
Attachment C: Standard Procedures
Attachment D: RedLab Analytical Report
Attachment E: Notification of Discharge Documents ‐ UST‐62 Form
Attachment F: AES Waste Disposal Documents
AttachmentA
%BWJETPO
6RXWKPRQW1&
1$
,6SLOO1HDU([W/LQZRRG1RUWK&DUROLQD
%XFN
V:UHFNHU6HUYLFH
1RUWK &DUROLQD/LQZRRG
,QHDU([W
7RSRJUDSKLF 0DS
0*-
%'0
Spill Location
SS-1SS-3SS-6SS-7SS-8SS-9SS-10SS-11SS-12SS-13SS-14SS-5SS-4SS-2Approximate Location of Fiber Optic CableFigure 2Sample Location Map Linwood Pine Glo Spill Linwood, NCApproximate Spill Area
AttachmentB
AttachmentC
StandardFieldProcedures:Revision10.6Page1
PyramidEnvironmental&Engineering,P.C.Revisiondate01Ͳ06Ͳ2020
Standard Field Procedures
Pyramid Environmental & Engineering, P.C.
________________________________________________________________________
1.0 Equipment Decontamination
Equipmentdecontaminationisessentialtoassurerepresentativeenvironmentalsamples
arecollectedandtoeliminatethepotentialforcrossͲcontaminationbetweensamplepoints.
Pyramidstrivestocleanallfieldequipmentpriortoleavingtheoffice;however,field
decontaminationisstillrequiredonmostprojects.Theproceduresfordecontaminationof
waterlevelprobes,handaugers,samplingprobes,trowels,andotherfieldequipmentare
listedbelow.
1.1 EPA Region IV Decontamination Procedures
Drillingandsoilsamplingequipmentisdecontaminatedpriortoeachuseusingapressure
washerorsteamcleaner.Reusablesamplingequipment(handaugers,samplingprobes,
trowels,splitspoonsamplers,watersamplingequipment,etc.…)aredecontaminatedusing
thegeneralproceduredescribedbelow.x WashwithnonͲphosphatedetergent,water,&brushtoremoveparticulatematter
x Rinsewithtapwater
x Rinsewith10percentnitricacidsolution(onlyifsamplingformetals)
x RinsewithdeͲionizedwater
x RinsewithpesticideͲgradeisopropylalcohol
x RinsewithdeͲionizedwater
x AirͲdryaslongaspossible
Thelevelofdecontaminationusedisappropriatetotheanalyticalparametersselectedand
thematerialofthesamplingdevicebeingusedforsampling.Forexample,ifmetalsanalyses
arerequired,thenthe10%nitricacidsolutionisusedfordecontaminationofstainlessͲsteel
equipment.PyramidusesdeͲionizedordistilledwaterfordecontamination.Equipmentthat
isnotusedimmediatelyafterdecontaminationiswrappedinaluminumfoilpriortostorage.
2.0 Soil Borings & Sampling
2.1 Soil Borings
SoilboringsareusedbyPyramidtoinvestigateandcharacterizethesubsurfaceatsites.
Soilboringsprovideinformationconcerningsoiltypesanddensity,depthtorefusal,depth
tobedrock,organicvaporsthatmaybepresent,andcanbeusedtoobtainsamplesfor
laboratoryanalysis.
StandardFieldProcedures:Revision10.6Page2
PyramidEnvironmental&Engineering,P.C.Revisiondate01Ͳ06Ͳ2020
Pyramidconductsboringsinseveraldifferentways,usinghandaugers,directͲpush
equipment(Geoprobe),sampleprobes,splitͲspoonsamplers(ASTMD1586Ͳ84),auger
drilling,airdrilling,andVibroͲCore.ThefollowingproceduresareusedbyPyramid
Environmentalwhenperformingsoilborings:
1. Soilboringlocationsarechosen,andtheULOCOutilitylocatingserviceiscalledto
markallpublicutilities.Pyramidlocatesprivateutilitiesatmanyprojectsitesusing
Pyramidlocatingequipment,orusesaprivateutilitylocatingservice.
2. Downholedrillingequipmentiscleanedpriortouseandbetweenboringsusing
pressurewashingorsteamcleaning.Additionaldecontaminationproceduresin
Section1.1areusedforsamplingtoolssuchassplitspoonsordirectͲpushpoints.
3. SoilboringsareadvancedusingdirectͲpush,drillingrigs,handaugers,orother
appropriatemeans.NearͲsurfacesoilsamplesmayalsobecollectedusingstainless
steelpushprobes,shovels,scoops,orothersamplingdevices.
4. Soilsamplesarenormallycollectedataminimumof5Ͳfootintervals.Eachsampleis
dividedintotwoparts.Soilsamplesforlaboratoryanalysesarejarredfromtheinitial
samplevolume.Theremainingsoilisstoredinasealedcontainerforheadspace
analysisandgeologicaldescription.
5. Afterscreeningthesoilwiththefieldinstruments,eachsoilsampleisdescribedby
thefieldgeologistandageologicdescriptionisrecordedinprojectdocumentation.
6. Soilsaretypicallydescribedinthefieldbytheprojectgeologistorsoilscientistand
areclassifiedaccordingtotheUnifiedSoilClassificationSystem(ASTMD2488Ͳ84).
7. Soilsamplesselectedforlaboratoryanalysisareplacedinproperlyprepared,
laboratorysuppliedcontainersandimmediatelypackedinacooleronice.Sample
custodyismaintainedusingstandardchainͲofͲcustody(COC)proceduresthrough
deliverytotheanalyticallaboratory.
8. Soilborings,whicharenotcompletedasmonitoringwells,aregroutedusinga
Portlandcement,bentonite,orbackfilledwithsoilcuttings.
9. Soilcuttingsaregenerallyspreadnearthesoilboringormonitoringwelllocationas
directedbyStateregulatorymanagers.Drillcuttingsaredrummed(containerized)
wheresiteconditionsorregulatoryrequirementsprohibitspreadingcuttings,and
aredisposedoffͲsite(afterwastedeterminationismade).
StandardFieldProcedures:Revision10.6Page3
PyramidEnvironmental&Engineering,P.C.Revisiondate01Ͳ06Ͳ2020
2.2 Soil Headspace Screening
Soilsamplesareroutinelyscreenedforvolatileorganiccompounds(VOCs)whichmaybean
indicationoforganicorpetroleumhydrocarboncontamination.Thetypicalscreening
procedureincludesimmediatelytransferringthesoilfromthesamplingdevicestoasealed
container(sealed1ͲgallonZiplockplasticbag).Thesoilcontainerisfilledapproximately
halfwaywithsoilandsealed.ThiscreatesheadspaceabovethesoilinwhichVOCsmay
accumulate.Thecontainerisallowedtostandfor5to15minutesfortheVOCstoequilibrate
intheheadspaceofthecontainer.Theheadspaceofthecontaineristhenscreenedusinga
calibratedorganicvaporanalyzer(PIDorFID).Thescreeningisconductedbycrackingthe
sealonlyenoughtoallowinsertionoftheprobeintotheheadspacesoasnottodilutethe
sample.Inmostcaseswherethecontaminantofconcernincludesvolatileorganics,the
highestor“Peak“fieldͲscreeningresultisdocumentedforeachsample.Thesoilsamples
showingthehighestreadingfromeachboringaretypicallyselectedforlaboratoryanalysis.
2.3 Soil Sample Collection for Laboratory Analysis
Afterthetargeteddepthhasbeenreached,soilsamplesarecollectedusingavarietyof
samplingdevices.SoilsampledevicesusedincludesplitͲspoons,stainlessͲsteelhandaugers,
stainlessͲsteelpushͲprobesandsamplingscoops,anddirectlyfromthecenterofthe
excavatorbucket.Thesampletechnicianusesdisposablenitrilegloves,whicharechanged
betweensamplestoavoidcrossͲcontaminationofsamples,andeachsamplingdeviceis
decontaminatedpriortouse.
Onlylaboratoryprovidedcontainersareusedforsamplecollection.Samplesarecollected
inaccordancewiththepreservationmethodsrequiredbytherequestedanalyticalmethod.
Samplesarehandledaslittleaspossibleandpreservedinthefieldasspecifiedforthe
analyticalmethod.Thesamplesarestoredandtransportedtothelaboratoryinaninsulated
coolerchilledtoapproximately4degreescentigrade.Thesamplesarelabeledwitha
minimumofthefollowinginformation:Pyramid,projectnameornumber,sample
identification,datecollected,samplername,andanalysisrequested.Samplecustodyis
maintainedusingstandardchainͲofͲcustodyproceduresthroughdeliverytotheanalytical
laboratory.Notesofthesamplingeventsarerecordedinprojectdocumentation.
Incrementalsamplingmethodology(ISM)isastructuredcompositesamplingand
processingprotocolthatreducesdatavariabilityandprovidesareasonablyunbiased
estimateofmeancontaminantconcentrationsinavolumeofsoiltargetedforsampling.
ISMprovidesrepresentativesamplesofspecificsoilvolumesdefinedasdecisionunits
(DUs)bycollectingnumerousincrementsofsoil(typically30–100increments)thatare
combined,processed,andsubsampledaccordingtospecificprotocols.ISMSamplingwill
befurtherexplainedinasiteͲspecificWorkPlandocuments.
PyramidwillcontractanonͲsitelaboratoryforimmediateanalysesasneeded.
StandardFieldProcedures:Revision10.6Page4
PyramidEnvironmental&Engineering,P.C.Revisiondate01Ͳ06Ͳ2020
2.4 Sediment Sample Collection for Laboratory Analysis
Nearsurfacesedimentmaybepresentinasurfacewaterditch,stream,ordryintermittent
streambed.Sedimentsamplesaretypicallysoilrelatedsamplesandmaybecollectedwith
avarietyofsamplingtools.PyramidwillusestainlessͲsteelsamplerswhichhavebeen
decontaminatedaccordingtotheproceduredetailedinsection1.1ofthisdocument.After
thesedimentsamplesarecollected,thelocation,depth,conditions,andsample
compositionaredocumentedintheprojectrecords.Thesampleswillbescreenedinthe
fieldtodetectvolatileorganicvaporsandvisuallyexaminedforcontamination.Sediment
sampleswillbepreservedinlaboratorypreparedcontainersinaccordancewithsample
preservationrecommendationoftheanalyticallaboratory.Samplesarehandledaslittleas
possibleandpreservedinthefieldasspecifiedfortheanalyticalmethod.Thesamplesare
storedandtransportedinaninsulatedcoolerchilledtoapproximately4degreescentigrade.
Thesamplesarelabeledwithaminimumofthefollowinginformation:Pyramid,project
nameornumber,sampleidentification,datecollected,samplername,andanalysis
requested.SamplecustodyismaintainedusingstandardchainͲofͲcustodyprocedures
throughdeliverytotheanalyticallaboratory.Documentationofthesamplingeventsare
recordedintheprojectdocumentation.
3.0 Direct-Push Sampling Procedures
DirectͲpushsamplingtechniqueshavebeenusedatmanysitestocollectsoiland
groundwatersamplesrapidlyandinexpensively.TrackͲmounted,directͲpushrigscanaccess
hardtoreachareasandallowboringsandmonitoringwellstobeinstalled.Forsoilsampling,
typically,thedirectͲpushsteeldrivetubeisdecontaminatedusingapressurewasher,anda
newplasticsamplelinerisinsertedinthesteeldrivetubetocollectsoilsamples.Thesoil
samplesarecollectedinnewpolyethylenesampletubeswithinthesteeldrivetube.Thesoil
samplesarethenextractedfromthepolyethylenelinerandpreservedasrequiredfor
laboratoryanalysis.
Forgroundwatersampling,asteelprobewitharetractablescreensectionandtubingare
driventodepthandthescreenedsectionisopenedtoallowgroundwatertoenterthe
tubing.ThewatersamplesarewithdrawnusingnewpolyethyleneandTeflon®tubingwith
eitheradecontaminatedstainlessͲsteelcheckball,orperistalticpump.Thegroundwater
sampleisplaceddirectlyintotheappropriatelaboratorycontainersandsealedimmediately.
TopreventcrossͲcontaminationofsamples,newdisposabletubingisusedforeach
groundwatersamplepoint.Disposablenitrileglovesarewornbyfieldpersonnelduring
developmentandgroundwatersampling,andglovesarechangedbetweensamples.
GroundwatersamplingproceduresaredetailedmoreinSection5.0,asappropriateforeach
analyticalmethod.
StandardFieldProcedures:Revision10.6Page5
PyramidEnvironmental&Engineering,P.C.Revisiondate01Ͳ06Ͳ2020
4.0 Monitoring Well Installation
Groundwatermonitoringwellsareinstalledinmanysubsurfaceenvironments;Coastal
Plain,sedimentary,Piedmontsaprolite,weatheredrockformations,andmountainterrains
tolistafew.Formationsencounteredincludeunconsolidatedandconsolidatedsediments,
fillmaterial,organicsoils,saproliticsoils,weatheredrockformations,andbedrock.
Groundwatermonitoringwellsprovideastablesamplingpointatdiscreteintervalswithin
theconfinedorunconfinedaquifers.Monitoringwellsareinstalledforanumberofreasons,
andaretypicallyinstalledas1Ͳinch,2Ͳinch,4Ͳinch,or6Ͳinchdiameterwells.Construction
maybeofPVC,stainlessͲsteel,HDPE,orotherappropriatematerials.Thefollowing
proceduresareusedbyPyramidwhenperformingboringsandmonitoringwellinstallations.x Ifrequired,monitoringwellpermitsareobtainedfromtheState,County,orCity.
x Boringandmonitoringwelllocationsarechosen,andutilitiesaremarkedbythe
publicutilitylocatingcompany.Asneeded,thelocationsmaybescannedforutilities
byPyramidusingourlocatingequipment,oraprivateutilitylocatingcompany.
x Inselectingadrillsite,careistakentoavoidoverheadpowerlines,andsubsurface
utilitieswheneverpossible.
x DownͲholedrillingequipmentisdecontaminatedpriortouseandbetweenborings.
x BoringsareadvancedusingdirectͲpush,drillingrigs,handaugers,solidͲstemaugers,
hollowͲstemaugers,airrotarydrilling,orairhammerdrilling.
x Soilsamplesarenormallycollectedataminimumof5Ͳfootintervals.Eachsampleis
dividedintotwoparts.Soilsamplesforlaboratoryanalysesarejarredfromtheinitial
samplevolume.Theremainingsoilisstoredinasealedcontainerforheadspace
analysiswithanorganicvaporanalyzer(PIDorFID).
x Afterscreeningthesoilwiththefieldinstruments,eachsoilsampleisdescribedby
thefieldgeologistandageologicdescriptionisrecordedintheproject
documentation.
TypeIImonitoringwellsareusuallyinstalledusing2Ͳinchdiameterschedule40PVCriser
and2Ͳinch,0.010Ͳinchmachineslottedwellscreen.Thescreenedintervallengthvarieswith
thegeologicsiteconditions,expectedvariationsinwaterlevel,andtheinvestigationgoals
forthewell.Thewellconstructiondetailsarepresentedontheboringlog.
TypeIIIwellsareusuallyinstalledasdoubleͲcasedwellstomonitorthedeeperportionsof
theaquifer.Thefirstcasingisusuallya5to6ͲinchdiametersolidPVCwellcasingdrilledto
bedrockoranappropriatedepthwithinthesurficialzone.The5to6Ͳinchdiametercasing
isthensetandgroutedintheborehole.Afterthecementgrouthassetfor12to24Ͳhours,
theboreholeiscompletedtothedesireddepthusingairrotarydrillingorairhammer
drilling.TheinsidecasingoftheTypeIIImonitoringwellisusuallyconstructedof2Ͳinch
diameterSCH40PVCcasingand2ͲinchdiameterSCH40PVC0.010Ͳinchslottedwellscreen.
StandardFieldProcedures:Revision10.6Page6
PyramidEnvironmental&Engineering,P.C.Revisiondate01Ͳ06Ͳ2020
Inmostapplications,asandfilterpackof#2wellsand(orappropriatelysizedwellsand).
Sandistypicallyinstalledtoalevelof2feetabovethetopofthescreenineachwell.
Aminimum2Ͳfootthickbentonitesealisusuallyplacedontopofthefilterpackand
hydratedwithdeͲionizedordistilledwater.Theremainingannularspaceofatypicalwellis
backfilledtogradewithaPortlandcement/bentonitegrout.Inmonitoringwellswherethe
watertableisclosetosurface,theamountofsandabovethescreenandbentonitewillbe
reducedtoallowforaminimumof2–3feetofcementgroutinthewellbore.
Atthesurface,eachwellissecuredwithalockingcapandasteelwellprotector.Depending
onthesurfaceconditions,thewellmaybeprotectedbyaflushͲmountedmanholesetinthe
surroundingsurfaceinaconcretepad.Insomecases,stickͲupwellprotectorsareusedto
securethewellandallowthewelltobemoreeasilylocatedinwoodedoropenareas.
Eachgroundwatermonitoringwellisdevelopedbysurging,pumping,orbailingtoremove
sedimentbeforesampling.Waterremovedduringdevelopmentismanagedaccordingto
individualStateregulatoryguidance.
5.0 Water Sampling Procedures
Pyramidreliesonwatersamplingasaprimarymethodforassessmentofsubsurface
groundwaterconditions.Watersamplingtypicallyincludessamplinggroundwaterfrom
monitoringwells,watersupplywells,surfacewaterbodies,stormwater,wastesumps,etc.
Thefollowingprovidestypicalsamplingproceduresforthewatersamples.
5.1 Monitoring Wells
Priortosamplingeachmonitoringwell,depthtoliquidand/orliquidsandtotalwelldepth
aremeasuredusingaproperlydecontaminatedelectricinterfaceprobe.IfphaseͲseparated
petroleumproductisdetectedinawell,theproductmeasurementsarerecordedalongwith
thewaterlevelineachwell.Thisinformationisrecordedinthefieldrecordandthevolume
ofthewaterinthewellcasingiscalculated.Topurgestagnantwaterfromeachmonitoring
well,threetofivewellcasingvolumesofwaterareremovedfromeachwellpriorto
sampling.Alternately,forlowͲflowsampling,developmentcontinuesuntilthefield
parameters(pH,conductivity,dissolvedoxygen,ORP,andtemperature)havestabilized.
Ifthewaterinthemonitoringwellisremoveduntilthewellisdry,thenthewellissampled
thereafter.Waterremovedfromwellsduringpurgingismanagedinaccordancewith
individualStateregulatoryguidance.
Groundwatersamplesaretypicallycollectedusinganewdisposablepolyethylenebailerand
anewlengthofnyloncord.TopreventcrossͲcontaminationofsamplesbetweenwells,a
newdisposablebailerisusedforeachwell.Thebailerisloweredintothegroundwater
StandardFieldProcedures:Revision10.6Page7
PyramidEnvironmental&Engineering,P.C.Revisiondate01Ͳ06Ͳ2020
slowlyandremovedslowly.Anewpairofdisposableglovesiswornbyfieldpersonnel
duringpurgingandsampling,andischangedbetweenwells.Inthecaseofsmalldiameter
monitoringwellsordirectͲpushwatersamples,watersamplesmaybecollectedusinga
peristalticpumpandnewpolyethylenetubing.Anothermethodistouseasegmentofnew
samplingtubingandastainlessͲsteelcheckballtocreatea“TubeBailer”.
Groundwatersamplesselectedforlaboratoryanalysisareimmediatelyplacedinproperly
prepared,laboratorysuppliedcontainersandpreservedinacooleronice.Samplesare
maintainedunderstandardchainͲofͲcustodyproceduresfromsamplecollectionthrough
laboratoryanalysis.
5.2 Water Supply Well Sampling
Priortosamplingeachwatersupplywell,thewellowneriscontactedtoprovideaccessto
thewell.Thewellownerisinterviewedtolocatethefaucetclosesttothewellforsampling.
Iftherearenofaucetslocatedonthewell,thenwaterfromanoutsidefaucetatthebuilding
isusuallysampled.Iftherearenooutsidefaucetsavailable,thenthewatersamplesare
collectedfromaninsidefaucet.Thelocationofthesampleisrecordedinthefieldrecord.
Theownerisinterviewedtoseeifthereisachlorinationsystemonthewell,orifthewell
hasbeenrecentlychlorinated.Recentchlorinationcouldaffectthelaboratorydetection
limits.Inmostcases,thesamplesarepreservedusingsodiumthiosulfateorascorbicacidto
removetheinteractionsofchlorine,whichmaybepresentinthesamples.
IfthewellistreatedwithaPointͲofͲEntry(POE)treatmentsystem,thenthe“raw”water
samplemustbecollectedbeforethetreatmentsystem.Anassociatedtreatedwatersample
isusuallycollectedaswelltodemonstrateeffectivetreatment.
Topurgestagnantwaterfromthewatersupplywellsystem,thefaucetisallowedtorunon
fullstreamforaminimumof15minutes.Theaeratorisremovedfromthetapifoneis
present.Waterremovedfromwellsduringpurgingismanagedaccordingtoregulatory
standards.
Watersupplywellsamplesarecollectedusingappropriatelaboratorypreparedcontainers
foreachanalysis.Theanalyticalmethodsselectedwillvarywiththecontaminantof
interest.TopreventcrossͲcontaminationofsamplesbetweenwells,disposablenitrilegloves
arewornbyfieldpersonnelduringpurgingandsamplingandarechangedbetweenwells.It
ispossiblethatsamplesmayberequiredatseveralplaceswithinthewatersupplysystem.
Thesamplesarecollectedaccordinglyandlabeledtoshowthesourceandlocationsampled.
Supplywellsamplesselectedforlaboratoryanalysisareimmediatelyplacedinproperly
prepared,laboratorysuppliedcontainersandpackedinacooleronice,andchilledto
approximately4degreesCelsius.SamplesaremaintainedunderstandardchainͲofͲcustody
proceduresfromsamplecollectionthroughlaboratoryanalysis.
StandardFieldProcedures:Revision10.6Page8
PyramidEnvironmental&Engineering,P.C.Revisiondate01Ͳ06Ͳ2020
5.3 Surface Water Sampling
Surfacewatersamplesareobtainedusingseveraltechniquesincludinguseofsample
bailers,discretedepthintervalsamples,samplescoops,fromboats,bridges,orwadinginto
astream.Cautionshouldalwaysbeusedwhensamplingsurfacewatertoensurethatthe
watercollectedisrepresentativeofthesiteconditions.Sincestreamoropenwatersampling
istransient,carefuldocumentationofthesiteconditions,weather,surfaceconditions,
sediment,algalorbiologicalmaterial,etc.isrequired.
Inmanystudies,additionalsamplesfromupstreamanddownstreamofthedesiredsample
pointarerequired.SurfacewatersamplingmustbeplannedtoreflectthesiteͲspecific
conditionsduringsampling.Thegeneralproceduresaresimilartothesupplywellsampling
proceduresdetailedabove.Appropriatelaboratorypreparedcontainersareusedforeach
analysis.Theanalyticalmethodsselectedwillvarywiththecontaminantofinterest.
TopreventcrossͲcontaminationofsamplesbetweensamples,disposablenitrileglovesare
wornbyfieldpersonnelduringpurgingandsamplingandarechangedbetweensamples.It
ispossiblethatsamplesmayberequiredatseveralplacesalongthestreamtocheckfor
influencesofupͲstreamfacilities.Sampleswillbecollectedaccordinglyandlabeledtoshow
thesourceandlocationsampled.Samplewillalwaysbecollectedupstreamofthearea
disturbedbythepersonsamplingthestream.Surfacewatersamplesselectedforlaboratory
analysisareplacedinproperlyprepared,laboratorysuppliedcontainersandimmediately
packedinacooleronice.SamplesaremaintainedunderstrictcontrolusingstandardchainͲ
ofͲcustodyproceduresthroughlaboratoryanalysis.
6.0 Quality Assurance / Quality Control
Thefieldandlaboratoryprocedureslistedabovehavebeenimplementedonmanysites
withexcellentresults.Theproceduresareoftenverifiedbyanappropriateuseofthe
followingenvironmentalsamples.
TripBlanks(orTravelblanks)
TheTripBlank(ortravelblanks)areoftenusedtoverifythattheenvironmentalsamplesare
notimpactedduringshipping,andverifythatthesourceoftheglasswareisnotthesource
ofcontamination.ThetripblanksarepreserveddeͲionizedwater,collectedinthe
laboratory,andshippedwiththesamplecontainerstoPyramidorthesite.Thetripblank
remainsinthesamplecoolerandisshippedbacktothelaboratorywiththeenvironmental
samples.Thetripblankismostcommonlyanalyzedforvolatileorganiccompounds(VOCs),
andcorrespondtothetargetanalyses.
StandardFieldProcedures:Revision10.6Page9
PyramidEnvironmental&Engineering,P.C.Revisiondate01Ͳ06Ͳ2020
FieldBlanks
FieldBlanksarequalityassurancesampleswhicharecollectedinthefieldtorepresentthe
conditionspresentatthetimethesamplesarecollected.Forwatersamples,thelaboratory
containersareopenedandfilledinthefieldusingdeͲionized(ordistilled)waterfroma
knownsource.Thesamplesreflectanysiteconditionssuchasvaporsourceswhichmay
affectthewatersamples.Thesamplesthentraveltothelaboratorywiththeothersamples
foranalysis.Comparisonofthefieldblankresultswiththesampleresultsmayindicatea
pervasivesiteconstituentdetectedinthesamples.
EquipmentBlanks
EquipmentBlanksareusedtoverifywhetherthedecontaminationproceduresusedforthe
sampleequipment(orthenewequipment)mayhaveaddedanycontaminantstothe
sampleduringcollection.IfanonͲdisposablesamplingdeviceisused(suchasasampling
treir,scoop,handauger,Teflonbailer,etc.…),thenthedecontaminationofthesampling
deviceisusuallyverifiedusinganequipmentblank.Theequipmentblankiscollectedusing
deͲionized(ordistilled)waterfromaknownsource.Theequipmentisdecontaminated,
allowedtoairdry,thewaterispouredover(orthrough)theequipment,andasampleis
collectedintheappropriatesamplecontainers.Theequipmentblanksamplesarepreserved
withtheotherenvironmentalsamples,andshippedforanalysesforthetargetparameters.
DuplicateSamples
DuplicateSamplesareusedtoverifythesamplingproceduresandevaluatelaboratory
analysisvariability.Theduplicatesamplesmaybecollectedfromsoil,sediment,air,surface
water,wastes,orgroundwater.Thesesamplesarecollectedandsenttothelaboratoryas
blindsamplestohavemaximumeffectiveness.Duplicatesamplesaregenerallyanalyzedfor
thesameanalyticalmethodsastheactualenvironmentalsamplefordirectcomparison.
Duplicatesamplesmayalsobesplitbetweentwodifferentlaboratoriestoprovide
verificationoflaboratorydetectionlimitsorqualityprocessverification.
BackgroundSamples
BackgroundSamplesareatoolforcomparisonofgeneralsiteconditionswithsourcearea
siteconditions.Backgroundsamplesmaybesoil,sediment,air,surfacewater,waste,or
groundwater.Thegoalistoreflectconditionsoutsidetheexpectedareaofcontamination.
Thesesamplesarecollectedoutsidetheexpectedareaofcontaminationandsenttothe
laboratoryforanalyses.Backgroundsamplesaregenerallyanalyzedforthesameanalytical
methodsasthesourceareaenvironmentalsamplesfordirectcomparison.Background
samplesformetalscomparisonarecommontypesofbackgroundsamplesusedin
environmentalinvestigations.
AttachmentD
Hydrocarbon Analysis ResultsClient:PYRAMID ENVIRONMENTALSamples takenWednesday, January 18, 2023Address:503 INDUSTRIAL AVENUESamples extractedWednesday, January 18, 2023GREENSBORO NC 27406Samples analysedFriday, January 20, 2023Contact:BRIAN MAHANOperatorMAX MOYERProject:2023-02710F03640Matrix Sample IDDilution usedBTEX (C6 - C9)GRO (C5 - C10)DRO (C10 - C35)TPH (C5 - C35)Total Aromatics (C10-C35)16 EPA PAHsBaP HC Fingerprint Match% light % mid% heavys SS-1 23.2 <0.58 <0.58 0.58 0.58 0.31 <0.19 <0.023 0 66.3 33.7V.Deg.PHC 77.3%,(FCM),(P)s SS-2 12.5 <0.31 <0.31 <0.31 <0.31 <0.06 <0.1 <0.013 0 0 0,(FCM),(BO)s SS-3 12.1 <0.3 <0.3 2.1 2.1 1.1 <0.1 <0.012 0 69.8 30.2V.Deg.PHC 97.3%,(FCM),(P)s SS-4 13.1 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 <0.07 <0.1 <0.013 0 0 0,(FCM)s SS-5 12.4 <0.31 <0.31 0.31 0.31 0.34 <0.1 <0.012 0 55.7 44.3V.Deg.PHC 71.6%,(FCM)sSS-6 14.6<0.36<0.36<0.36<0.36 <0.07<0.12<0.015000,(FCM),(BO)sSS-7 14.0<0.35<0.35<0.35<0.35 <0.07<0.11<0.014000,(FCM),(BO)s SS-8 12.7 <0.32 <0.32 <0.32 <0.32 <0.06 <0.1 <0.013 0 0 0,(FCM)s SS-9 12.5 <0.31 <0.31 <0.31 <0.31 <0.06 <0.1 <0.013 0 100 0,(FCM)s SS-10 11.6 <0.29 <0.29 <0.29 <0.29 <0.06 <0.09 <0.012 0 0 0,(FCM)InitialCalibratorQCcheckOKFinalFCMQCCheckOK 98.5 %Results generated by a QED HC-1 analyser. Concentration values in mg/kg for soil samples and mg/L for water samples. Soil values are not corrected for moisture or stone contentFingerprints provide a tentative hydrocarbon identification. The abbreviations are:- FCM = Results calculated using Fundamental Calibration Mode : % = confidence for sample fingerprint match to library(SBS) or (LBS) = Site Specific or Library Background Subtraction applied to result : (PFM) = Poor Fingerprint Match : (T) = Turbid : (P) = Particulate presentRatios
Hydrocarbon Analysis ResultsClient:PYRAMID ENVIRONMENTALSamples takenWednesday, January 18, 2023Address:503 INDUSTRIAL AVENUESamples extractedWednesday, January 18, 2023GREENSBORO NC 27406Samples analysedFriday, January 20, 2023Contact:BRIAN MAHANOperatorMAX MOYERProject:2023-02718F03640Matrix Sample IDDilution usedBTEX (C6 - C9)GRO (C5 - C10)DRO (C10 - C35)TPH (C5 - C35)Total Aromatics (C10-C35)16 EPA PAHsBaP HC Fingerprint Match% light % mid% heavys SS-11 12.1 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.06 <0.1 <0.012 0 0 0,(FCM),(BO)s SS-12 11.3 <0.28 <0.28 0.36 0.36 0.16 <0.09 <0.011 0 70.2 29.8V.Deg.PHC 91.2%,(FCM)s SS-13 12.4 <0.31 <0.31 1.9 1.9 0.88 <0.1 <0.012 0 73.6 26.4Deg.PHC 84.7%,(FCM)s SS-14 11.7 <0.29 <0.29 0.68 0.68 0.29 <0.09 <0.012 0 69.1 30.9V.Deg.PHC 91.1%,(FCM)s DS-1 15.6 <0.39 <0.39 0.91 0.91 0.9 <0.12 <0.016 0 58.4 41.6V.Deg.PHC 71.5%,(FCM)s DS-2 2067.0 315.8 2750 4332 7082 1080 40.3 <2.1 97.9 2 0.1Deg.Diesel 91.2%,(FCM)s DS-3 2975.0 <74.4 1538 2721 4259 551.8 <23.8 <3 97.9 2.1 0Deg.Diesel 88.8%,(FCM)InitialCalibratorQCcheckOKFinalFCMQCCheckOK 99.3 %Results generated by a QED HC-1 analyser. Concentration values in mg/kg for soil samples and mg/L for water samples. Soil values are not corrected for moisture or stone contentFingerprints provide a tentative hydrocarbon identification. The abbreviations are:- FCM = Results calculated using Fundamental Calibration Mode : % = confidence for sample fingerprint match to library(SBS) or (LBS) = Site Specific or Library Background Subtraction applied to result : (PFM) = Poor Fingerprint Match : (T) = Turbid : (P) = Particulate presentRatios
QEDHydrocarbonFingerprints
Project: 2023Ͳ027 ##################
QEDHydrocarbonFingerprints
Project: 2023Ͳ027 ##################
AttachmentE
Y NYY N
13:30 1/17/22
Linwood Pine Glo Spill
Near Exit 84 on I-85 South Davidson
Linwood 27299
35.739756°-80.365408°
On 1//17/2022, a box truck carrying Pine Glo Ocean Antibacterial & Disinfectant
Cleaner lost control and wrecked On the side of I-85 south between exits 84 and 86. During the
wreck approximately 50 gallons of diesel fuel and 400 gallons of Pine Glo were spilled.
Shortly after the wreck Buck's Wrecker Service arrived on site
and started to suck up the Pine Glo and put absorbent material down to contain the spill.
None
X
Side of Road on I-85 in
Commercial Area
Google Earth
X
X
Pine Glo Ocean Antibacterial &
Disinfectant Cleaner
X
N/A
No Water Supply Wells Were Affected
N/A OTR Tractor Trailer
N/A OTR Tractor Trailer
NC DOT
Brian Mahan Pyramid Environmental & Engineering
Associate Project Manager 503 Industrial Ave., Greensboro, NC 27406 1/24/2023
(336) 335-3714
NBX Logistics, Inc.
Jacksonville
9555 Armelle Way
FL 32257-8897 (904) 860-8997
See Attached Map
See Attached Map
Hydrocarbon Analysis ResultsClient:PYRAMID ENVIRONMENTALSamples takenWednesday, January 18, 2023Address:503 INDUSTRIAL AVENUESamples extractedWednesday, January 18, 2023GREENSBORO NC 27406Samples analysedFriday, January 20, 2023Contact:BRIAN MAHANOperatorMAX MOYERProject:2023-02710F03640Matrix Sample IDDilution usedBTEX (C6 - C9)GRO (C5 - C10)DRO (C10 - C35)TPH (C5 - C35)Total Aromatics (C10-C35)16 EPA PAHsBaP HC Fingerprint Match% light % mid% heavys SS-1 23.2 <0.58 <0.58 0.58 0.58 0.31 <0.19 <0.023 0 66.3 33.7V.Deg.PHC 77.3%,(FCM),(P)s SS-2 12.5 <0.31 <0.31 <0.31 <0.31 <0.06 <0.1 <0.013 0 0 0,(FCM),(BO)s SS-3 12.1 <0.3 <0.3 2.1 2.1 1.1 <0.1 <0.012 0 69.8 30.2V.Deg.PHC 97.3%,(FCM),(P)s SS-4 13.1 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 <0.33 <0.07 <0.1 <0.013 0 0 0,(FCM)s SS-5 12.4 <0.31 <0.31 0.31 0.31 0.34 <0.1 <0.012 0 55.7 44.3V.Deg.PHC 71.6%,(FCM)s SS-6 14.6 <0.36 <0.36 <0.36 <0.36 <0.07 <0.12 <0.015 0 0 0,(FCM),(BO)s SS-7 14.0 <0.35 <0.35 <0.35 <0.35 <0.07 <0.11 <0.014 0 0 0,(FCM),(BO)s SS-8 12.7 <0.32 <0.32 <0.32 <0.32 <0.06 <0.1 <0.013 0 0 0,(FCM)s SS-9 12.5 <0.31 <0.31 <0.31 <0.31 <0.06 <0.1 <0.013 0 100 0,(FCM)s SS-10 11.6 <0.29 <0.29 <0.29 <0.29 <0.06 <0.09 <0.012 0 0 0,(FCM)InitialCalibratorQCcheckOKFinalFCMQCCheckOK 98.5 %Results generated by a QED HC-1 analyser. Concentration values in mg/kg for soil samples and mg/L for water samples. Soil values are not corrected for moisture or stone contentFingerprints provide a tentative hydrocarbon identification. The abbreviations are:- FCM = Results calculated using Fundamental Calibration Mode : % = confidence for sample fingerprint match to library(SBS) or (LBS) = Site Specific or Library Background Subtraction applied to result : (PFM) = Poor Fingerprint Match : (T) = Turbid : (P) = Particulate presentRatios
Hydrocarbon Analysis ResultsClient:PYRAMID ENVIRONMENTALSamples takenWednesday, January 18, 2023Address:503 INDUSTRIAL AVENUESamples extractedWednesday, January 18, 2023GREENSBORO NC 27406Samples analysedFriday, January 20, 2023Contact:BRIAN MAHANOperatorMAX MOYERProject:2023-02718F03640Matrix Sample IDDilution usedBTEX (C6 - C9)GRO (C5 - C10)DRO (C10 - C35)TPH (C5 - C35)Total Aromatics (C10-C35)16 EPA PAHsBaP HC Fingerprint Match% light % mid% heavys SS-11 12.1 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.06 <0.1 <0.012 0 0 0,(FCM),(BO)s SS-12 11.3 <0.28 <0.28 0.36 0.36 0.16 <0.09 <0.011 0 70.2 29.8V.Deg.PHC 91.2%,(FCM)s SS-13 12.4 <0.31 <0.31 1.9 1.9 0.88 <0.1 <0.012 0 73.6 26.4Deg.PHC 84.7%,(FCM)s SS-14 11.7 <0.29 <0.29 0.68 0.68 0.29 <0.09 <0.012 0 69.1 30.9V.Deg.PHC 91.1%,(FCM)s DS-1 15.6 <0.39 <0.39 0.91 0.91 0.9 <0.12 <0.016 0 58.4 41.6V.Deg.PHC 71.5%,(FCM)s DS-2 2067.0 315.8 2750 4332 7082 1080 40.3 <2.1 97.9 2 0.1Deg.Diesel 91.2%,(FCM)s DS-3 2975.0 <74.4 1538 2721 4259 551.8 <23.8 <3 97.9 2.1 0Deg.Diesel 88.8%,(FCM)InitialCalibratorQCcheckOKFinalFCMQCCheckOK 99.3 %Results generated by a QED HC-1 analyser. Concentration values in mg/kg for soil samples and mg/L for water samples. Soil values are not corrected for moisture or stone contentFingerprints provide a tentative hydrocarbon identification. The abbreviations are:- FCM = Results calculated using Fundamental Calibration Mode : % = confidence for sample fingerprint match to library(SBS) or (LBS) = Site Specific or Library Background Subtraction applied to result : (PFM) = Poor Fingerprint Match : (T) = Turbid : (P) = Particulate presentRatios
QEDHydrocarbonFingerprints
Project: 2023Ͳ027 ##################
QEDHydrocarbonFingerprints
Project: 2023Ͳ027 ##################
AttachmentF