09005_Canac Kitchens_EMP for Slab Renovations_2023Apr14_Final

1
EMP Version 3, March 2023
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDSREDEVELOPMENT SECTION
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Redevelopment Section at the direction of a Brownfields
project manager.

The EMP is a standard requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an effort
to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory-compliant
decision-making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.

Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development-related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the EMP to be valid for use, it must be
completed, reviewed by the Section, signed by all parties working on the project, and
approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of the
EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a recorded agreement, be cause for
a reopener.

The EMP is valid only for the scope of work described herein and must be updated to be
applicable for new phases of redevelopment or after significant changes in applicable
regulatory guidance.
satisfaction is required prior to EMP approval.

Voluntary Metrics Tab
The NC Brownfields Redevelopment Section updates estimated capital investment (from the
Brownfields Property Application) and estimated jobs created (from the Brownfields
Agreement) whenever possible. As a voluntary measure, you may opt to complete the below
information for capital investment and jobs created as estimated by your final redevelopment
plans for the Brownfields Property:

1. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: Click or tap here to enter
text.
2. Estimated jobs created:
a. Construction Jobs: Click or tap here to enter text.
b. Full Time Post-Redevelopment Jobs: Click or tap here to enter text.

2
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Table of Contents
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION .................................................................. 1
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................................................................... 1
GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................ 4
COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 5
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION ..................................................... 5
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS ........................................................................................................................ 6
CONTAMINATED MEDIA ......................................................................................................................... 8
PART 1. SOIL ........................................................................................................................................ 9
PART 2. GROUNDWATER .................................................................................................................. 19
PART 3. SURFACE WATER .................................................................................................................. 21
PART 4. SEDIMENT ............................................................................................................................ 21
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR ......................................................................................................................... 21
PART 6. INDOOR AIR ......................................................................................................................... 23
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM ............................................................................................. 23
CONTINGENCY PLAN ............................................................................................................................. 24
REPORTING..................................................................................................... 26
APPROVAL SIGNATURES ....................................................................................................................... 28

Figures

Figure 1 NCBP Diagram for Temporary Containment of Impacted or Potentially Impacted Soil
Figure 2 Proposed Slab Modifications and Soil Excavation Areas
Figure 3 Map of Proposed Excavated Soil Re-Use Area

Appendices

Appendix A Plat Map and Notice of Brownfields Property
3
EMP Version 3, March 2023
So that the EMP provides value in protecting Brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing all of the following is premature and may
be returned without comment.

Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields project manager.

Based on a March 7, 2023 meeting between DEQ, Terracon, and the PD, additional
sampling prior to development and implementation of this EMP for construction is not
necessary.

Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields project manager.

See Figure 2.

Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:

A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not, conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.

See Figure 2.

A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.

Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.

A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
onsite after construction grading.

Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).

A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.

Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

See Appendix A.

4
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

See Appendix A.

A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.

If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
Brownfields approval.

Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for import to the Brownfields Property.

A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Guidelines.

A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.

See Figure 2

If a Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) is required by the Brownfields
Redevelopment Section, the VIMS plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.

GENERAL INFORMATION

Date: 4/10/2023 Revision Date (if applicable): Click or tap to enter a date.

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Canac Kitchens

Brownfields Project Number: 19007-05-049

Brownfields Property Address: 607 Meacham Road, Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina 28677

Brownfields Property Area (acres): 28 acres
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?....................... Yes No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit . Yes No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.

5
EMP Version 3, March 2023
COMMUNICATIONS

A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities in an area that is
prominently accessible to site workers. NOTE, THE EMP DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE-SPECIFIC
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.

Prospective Developer (PD): Dura Supreme Cabinets
Contact Person: Bill Wickesberg
Phone Numbers: Office: 952-292-4077 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: [e-mail]

Contractor for PD: Allstar Concrete Specialists
Contact Person: Jose Gonzalez
Phone Numbers: Office: Click or tap here to enter text. Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Environmental Consultant: Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Contact Person: Will Frazier
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-324-7375 Mobile: [phone]
Email: Click or tap here to enter text.

Brownfields Redevelopment Section Project Manager: David Peacock
Phone Numbers: Office: 910-796-7401 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
Click or tap here to enter text.

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields project manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:

On site assessment or remedial activities:. 10 days Prior

Construction or grading start:. 10 days Prior

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: .Within 48 hours

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
6
EMP Version 3, March 2023
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):. Within 48 hours

Installation of mitigation systems:.. 10 days Prior

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): .Within 30 days
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
Residential Townhomes (Prior written DEQ approval REQUIRED regardless of ownership
structure)Recreational Institutional Commercial Office Retail Industrial
Other specify:
Interior upfitting and operational function modifications. This EMP pertains to modifications of
the existing building slab that are necessary as part of the operational upfits.

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth moving activities
at the site:
Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.

A subcontract utility locate will be engaged to conduct a ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey
in the areas of proposed disturbance prior to saw cutting of the building foundation slab to
determine if sub-grade utilities are present. If potential utilities are identified in the proposed
excavation areas, alternate excavation methodology (e.g. soft dig, air-knife) may be
implemented to safely lower the grade to the necessary depth to accommodate the desired
new slab thickness (see item 3 below). If the GPR survey identifies a suspect UST, the
Brownfields Project Manager will be contacted to discuss follow up actions that may be
necessary.

Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors

3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:

Dura Supreme Cabinets (Dura) is engaging in a lease agreement with the Follow-On Owner (GTIS
Partners) of the Brownfields Property to occupy the on-site facility. Dura proposes to complete
interior upfits of the facility building to accommodate its planned manufacturing activities.
Among these upfits are renovations to 40 discrete areas of the building foundation slab, as
shown in Figure 2. The purpose of the slab renovations is as follows:
7
EMP Version 3, March 2023

1) To fill former equipment pits with crushed virgin stone and install new slab to bring these
areas up to the same finished grade as the surrounding floor (x 3; shown in red on Figure
2);
2) To repair areas where the slab is cracked via replacement of the concrete (x 32; shown in
black on Figure 2; three of the repair areas coincide with planned isolation pads); and
3) To create vibration isolation pads for planned heavy manufacturing equipment (x 8;
shown in red on Figure 2; three isolation pads coincide with areas slated for repair)

The first of these tasks will not involve ground disturbance or result in worker contact with on-
site soils. Sub-slab soils likely will be encountered during execution of the latter two tasks, as
soils will likely be stuck to the underside of the concrete to be removed and, depending on the
thickness of the slabs removed, soil may require excavation to allow for the replacement slab to
be 6-inches thick (in the case of task number 2) and 8-inches thick (in the case of task number 3).

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
Yes No Unknown
If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.

5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
S&EC requirements can be found at: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-and-land-
resources/erosion-and-sediment-control/erosion-and-sediment-control-laws-and-rules
Yes No Unknown
If yes, please check here to confirm that earth-work will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.

6) Which category of risk based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
Residential Non Residential or Industrial/Commercial

7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 4/7/2023

b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
Approximately 2 months

8
EMP Version 3, March 2023
c) Additional phases planned? Yes No

While additional redevelopment phases are not planned at this time, the procedures and
protocols included within this EMP shall be applicable to potential future planned phases of
ground disturbance associated with building foundation slab modifications. Prior to additional
phases of slab modification, DEQ will receive written notification.

If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 4/1/2023

Dura will likely begin occupation of the office portions of the on-site building prior to the
completion of the slab renovation project (required before they begin manufacturing
operations).

CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Please fill out the sections below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas
of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure overlaying new
construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil: Yes No Suspected Unknown
Part 2. Groundwater: .................................... Yes No Suspected Unknown
Part 3. Surface Water: Yes No Suspected Unknown N/A
Part 4. Sediment: .......................................... Yes No Suspected Unknown N/A
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ......................................... Yes No Suspected Unknown
Part 6. .......................... Yes No Suspected Unknown
Part 7. Indoor Air: ......................................... Yes No Suspected Unknown

9
EMP Version 3, March 2023
2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.

Impacted environmental media has not been identified in the areas of proposed soil
disturbance. Impacted media identified at the site are documented in Tables A and B of the
Notice of Brownfields Property, Appendix A. Copies of the NBP and associated Plat Map
showing the sample locations are provided as an attachment to this EMP.

PART 1. SOIL
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
Soil in portions of the site is known to be impacted above applicable standards for lead and
chromium. The soil impacts identified are limited to the northwestern portion of the building, in
the vicinity of a former plating line used in the former furniture manufacturing operations on
site. Additional soil impacts above applicable standards have not been identified.

2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Approximately 2 feet below land surface (bls)

3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
Approximately 13,933 square feet of soil will be exposed after the slab has been saw cut.

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
The exact depths of soil to be excavated from the saw cuts is not known. The client requires an
at least 6-inch-thick slab in the areas of concrete requiring repair due to cracks and at least an 8-
inch-thick slab in areas where the vibration isolation pads are to be installed.

5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
The areas of proposed soil excavation are shown on Figure 2. Boring logs from a prior
environmental report completed in 2003 by others reported slab thicknesses in eastern portion
of the on-site warehouse (near Isolation Pads shown in red and numbered 16 through 18) of 6
and 8 inches. It is not known whether the slab in other portions of the building similarly thick.
Conservatively assuming that the existing building slab is 4-inches thick, to provide the necessary
new slab thicknesses, the soils underlying the areas of concrete repair will require excavation to
a depth of 2 inches below base of existing concrete, while the areas in which the vibration
isolation pads will be installed will require excavation to a depth of 4 inches below base of
existing concrete. Based on the above assumptions, approximately 121.5 cubic yards of soil will
be excavated from the beneath the slab.

6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
Existing analytical data has not identified impacted soils in the areas of proposed disturbance;
however, it is unknown whether impacted soils will be encountered during excavation.

10
EMP Version 3, March 2023
7)Estimated volumeof contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
The excavated soils are planned for either re-use on site (if analytical data from sampling of the
temporary stockpile see Section Part 1A below indicates concentrations are suitable for re-
use) or disposed off-site to an appropriately permitted facility (as discussed in Part 1C). Figure 3
shows the proposed area of re-use for the soils, if the data indicates re-use is acceptable.

PART 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part ....................................... Yes No
If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Click or tap here to enter text.

If yes, do the soils exceed the levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained In Policy?................................................. Yes No

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED IN POLICY, THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE USED ONSITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... Yes No
If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text.
TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text.
Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
Click or tap here to enter text.
If no, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.
11
EMP Version 3, March 2023
d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE USED ONSITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH
DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):

SRGs
Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Click or tap here to enter text.

Additional comments:
Soils disturbed during the slab renovations will be temporarily stockpiled within the on-site
building in accordance with Figure 1 of the EMP. Soils will be sampled in accordance with the
protocols outlined in Item 4 of Part 1A below.

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields project manager.
Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil onsite map to
Brownfields project manager once known.
Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Manage soil under impervious cap or clean fill
Describe cap or fill:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Confer with NC BF project manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re recorded if
actions are Post Recordation).
GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
Other. Please provide a description of the measure:

Re-use of impacted soils (if present) is not proposed at the Brownfields Property. If the
excavated soils are determined to be impacted based on the results of the stockpile sampling,
Click or tap here to enter text.
12
EMP Version 3, March 2023
the soils will be exported from the site and disposed of at an appropriately permitted facility in
accordance with Part 1C of the EMP.

4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Check to confirm that management of fugitive dust from site activities will be handled in
accordance with applicable local, state, and federal requirements.

Field screening of site soil
At a minimum, contractors shall be made aware of protocols should impacted soils (e.g. staining,
unusual odors, fill materials) be identified.

Describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting field
screening:

Based on the prior site investigation results, the contaminants of concern at the site are
metals. As such, personal environmental monitors (PEM) will be utilized to screen ambient
air for particulate matter below 10 micrometers in diameter. Should a PEM identify
particulate matter below this diameter, work shall be stopped temporarily and will not
begin until field screening indicates particulate matter in the work area has returned to a
safe level. Should it be necessary to continue work, temporary mitigation measures (e.g.
application of clean water to the soils to tamp down dust, mechanical ventilation, or the
use of PPE for site workers, etc.) may be implemented.

While it is not anticipated that construction workers will encounter volatile vapors from
beneath the slab during the renovation work. However, as a precautionary measure,
Terracon will also utilize a PID to screen ambient air for volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
If PID readings greater than 25 parts per million (ppm) greater than background levels are
identified, work will be temporarily stopped so that further evaluation can be conducted.
Work will not begin again until the vapor field screening indicates concentrations have
returned to background levels. If necessary to continue work, temporary mitigation
measures (e.g. mechanical ventilation, air purifying units, the use of PPE for site workers,
etc.) may be implemented.

possible presence of contaminated soil vapors in excavations beneath the slab. If during
construction, workers identify evidence of elevated vapor concentrations (odor,
lightheadedness, etc.) regardless of PID readings, work will be stopped until it is
determined that it is safe to proceed.

Soil sample collection
Yes

13
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Soils excavated from beneath the slab to accommodate the foundation upfits will be temporarily
stockpiled within the building in accordance with Figure 1. The stockpile will be sampled in
accordance with the protocols outlined below.

Not anticipated - In order to avoid delays in construction, a plan shall be in place for sampling
of suspect soils should they be encountered during redevelopment. If soil sample collection is
not anticipated but the need to do so is identified during redevelopment, notify the Brownfields
project manager of the anticipated sample and report dates for scheduling purposes.

Describe the sampling method (e.g., in situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.) and confirm that all
procedures outlined in applicable DEQ guidance for assessment shall be followed Typically, at
least one representative sample (per 500 yd3 for residential and 1,000 yd3 for commercial)
consisting of a 3 to 5-point composite sample with grab sample for VOCs based on the highest PID
reading is required to determine soil management options:

Based on the assumed depths of excavations described above, it is anticipated that the soil
stockpile will be approximately 121.5 cubic yards in volume. As such, one composite soil
sample will be collected from the stockpile using a decontaminated hand auger in
accordance with the sampling procedures outlined in the NCDEQ Inactive Hazardous Site
2020).

The sample will be composited from three to five individual locations by advancing the hand
auger approximately 2 feet into the stockpile at each location. The soils from each location
will be divided equally with one half placed in a sealed plastic bag that is placed on ice
within a cooler and the other half placed in a sealed plastic bag that is allowed to volatilize
for approximately 5 to 10 minutes. After the volatilization period, the headspace of the
second plastic bag (not placed on ice) will be screened for volatile vapors using a photo-
ionization detector (PID). A grab sample for VOC analysis will be collected from the sealed
plastic bag that had been stored on ice from the location exhibiting the highest PID reading.
For composite sample collection, soils from the sealed plastic bags (placed on ice) from
each set of borings will then be composited using a decontaminated stainless-steel bowl
and spoon via the sample homogenization procedures outlined in the U.S. Environmental
PROC-300-R3 (June 11, 2020) guidance.

The sample will be analyzed for VOCs (8260), SVOCs (8270), RCRA 8 Metals (6010/7471),
and hexavalent chromium (7199), as noted below. In addition to the grab (VOC) and
composite sample (other analyses), Terracon will also collect the following samples for
quality assurance/quality control purposes: one field/equipment blank (collected by
rinsing deionized water over the bucket of the hand auger and the mixing bowl and
collecting the rinsate in laboratory-supplied glassware; sample to be analyzed for VOCs
only), one blind duplicate sample analyzed for the full suite of analyses, and one matrix
spike/matrix spike-duplicate sample analyzed for the full suite of analyses.

14
EMP Version 3, March 2023
A Level II QA/QC package will be requested from the laboratory, whose reporting and
method detection limits will meet applicable screening criteria to the extent technologically
feasible. The analytical report will include the use of J-flags for estimated concentrations.

Check applicable chemical analytes for soil samples:
Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method
8260; EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA
List + Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199

Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides):
Click or tap here to enter text.

Check to confirm that by the North Carolina Professional
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect
soil sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the
sealing professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines and
methodologies are followed and reported to DEQ for determination and approval of soil
placement prior to final relocation.

If impacted soils above applicable PSRGs and/or site-specific risk thresholds are proposed to
be relocated on-site, prior to final placement on-site, the following shall be submitted for DEQ
review/approval

- Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the above referenced frequency and
following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum Requirements Checklist (Checklist) and in
accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of Contaminated Sites
(Guidelines)
- Figure outlining planned soil placement and any future site features including
buildings/hardscape/open areas
- A North Carolina PE/PG recommendation of placement

Impacts
Options
Onsite Placement without
conditions
Onsite placement under 2 ft
of cap or clean fill1, 2
All Constituents below applicable
PSRGs X
Constituents3 below applicable
PSRGs; Metals below background
but above PSRGs
X
15
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Constituents3 below applicable
PSRGs; Metals above Background
/PSRGs
X
Constituents above Applicable
PSRGs X
1: Requires Prior Written DEQ Approval
2: VOC impacted soils above applicable PSRGs shall not be placed directly beneath building footprints
without prior written DEQ approval.
3: Constituents indicate any samples evaluated for other than metals.

Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted in
accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion control,
prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing
contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as needed:

Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes below
(Check all that apply):
Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method
8260; EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA
List + Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199
Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text. PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text. Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides): Click or tap here to enter text.

Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, indicate if a work
plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
Click or tap here to enter text.

If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale:
Final grade sampling will not be completed, as the soils generated during the slab upfits
will have already been characterized during the above-described stockpile sampling and
will have either been deemed suitable for re-use/placement on the site or disposed of off-
site to an appropriately permitted facility.

Click or tap here to enter text.
16
EMP Version 3, March 2023
PART 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL

NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM
THE BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION. According to the Brownfields IR Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written approval
in advance by the Brownfields Redevelopment Section), will safeguard the liability protections
provided by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective

Requirements for importing fill:
Check to confirm that the import volumes outlined below have been confirmed based on
geotechnical evaluations.

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................Yes No Unknown

2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
Approximately 64 cubic yards of virgin, crushed stone material will be imported from the Martin
Marietta Statesville quarry in order to fill three former concrete-lined equipment pits (see blue
areas outlined on Figure 2) and bring the base up to grade so that concrete may be poured flush
with the surrounding slab. Per DEQ during a March 7, 2023 meeting, this crushed stone will not
require characterization prior to import.

3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range
of depths, list the range.)
The equipment pits in question are approximately 3 feet below the top of the existing concrete
slab. The crushed stone will be placed within the pits to approximately 6-inches below the top of
the slab and then topped with new concrete.

PRIOR TO SOIL PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, a Soil Import Request must be
submitted for DEQ Brownfields review and approval. The request shall consist of a data
package that details:

- Fill source location/history (Phase I if available, current aerials, etc.)
- Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the below frequency and
following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields Redevelopment Section
Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum Requirements Checklist (Checklist)
and in accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of
Contaminated Sites (Guidelines)
- A table comparing the import soil to existing site concentrations
- A PE/PG recommendation of import
- All relevant attachments listed in the Checklist

17
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Soil Import Sampling Requirements:
Source Sample Frequency Sample Analysis
Virgin Material from DEQ
Brownfields Pre-
approved Quarry
None (Contact Brownfields project manager for list of pre-
approved Quarries
DEQ Permitted Quarry
(Not Brownfields Pre-
approved)
At least one
representative sample
from area of planned
import
VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA
Metals, any site specific
COCs (e.g. pesticides,
PCBs, etc.)
Other NC DEQ
Brownfields Property
At least one
representative sample
per 1,000 yd3 consisting
of a 3-point composite
sample with grab sample
for VOCs based on the
highest PID reading
VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA
Metals, any site specific
COCs (e.g. pesticides,
PCBs, etc.)
Off-site
unpermitted/regulated
property
Bulk Landscape Material
from Commercial Vendor
(i.e. topsoil)
No Sampling Required

If other special considerations apply, discuss:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Carolina Professional
Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect soil
sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the sealing
professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines are followed and reported in
the Soil Import Request for DEQ approval. Failure to meet these requirements could result in
resampling and/or failure to approve import.

PART 1.C. SOIL EXPORT

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS REDEVELOPMENT SECTION. Failure to obtain approval may violate a brownfields
agreement causing a reopener or jeopardizing eligibility in the Section, endangering liability
protections and making said action possibly subject to enforcement. Justifications provided
below must be approved by the Section in writing prior to completing transport activities. Refer
to Brownfields IR 15 for additional details.

1) If export from the Brownfields Property is anticipated, export soil must be sampled at a
frequency of one sample per 1,000 yd3 consisting of a 3-point composite sample with a
grab sample for VOCs based on the highest PID reading. Samples shall be analyzed at a
minimum for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals plus any site specific COCs.

PRIOR TO EXPORT FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, a Soil Export Request must be
submitted for DEQ Brownfields review and approval. The request shall consist of a Data
18
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Package that details:

- Proposed Receiving Facility
- Analytical data that has been sampled in accordance with the above referenced
frequency and following procedures outlined in the most recent Brownfields
Redevelopment Section Environmental Site Assessment Work Plan Minimum
Requirements Checklist (Checklist) and in accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines for
Assessment and Cleanup of Contaminated Sites (Guidelines)
- A table comparing the export soil to concentrations on the receiving site concentrations
including risk comparison (Note that calculated risk cannot be increased on the receiving
site)
- A North Carolina PE/PG recommendation of export
- Written approval from the receiving site property owner representative for export
- All relevant attachments listed in the Checklist

Soil Export Options
Impacts
Options
Use as
Beneficial Fill
Off-site disposal at
other Brownfields
Property2,6,7
Off-site disposal
at LCID/CD
Landfill1, 3
Off-site disposal at Subtitle
D MSW/Permitted
Landfarm4
All Constituents below
applicable PSRGs X X X X
Constituents5 below
applicable PSRGs; Metals
below background but
above PSRGs
X X X
Constituents5 below
applicable PSRGs; Metals
above Background /PSRGs
X X X
Constituents above
Applicable PSRGs X X
1: Requires Prior Written DEQ Approval
2: VOC impacted soils above applicable PSRGs shall not be placed directly beneath building footprints
without prior written DEQ approval.
3: Requires comparison to site specific metals concentrations.
4: Facility to determine if they can accept soil within their permit.
5: Constituents indicate any samples evaluated for other than metals.
6: Requires written approval from receiving site property owner representative.
7. Site COCs must be in comparable concentrations to receiving site and not significantly raise risk of
the receiving site.

Engineer/Geologist sealing this EMP the consultant understands that no work plan for suspect soil
sample collection will be submitted beyond this EMP, and that it is the responsibility of the sealing
professional and property owner to ensure that all applicable guidelines are followed and reported in
the Soil Export Request for DEQ approval. Failure to meet these requirements could result in
resampling and/or failure to approve export.

19
EMP Version 3, March 2023
If other special considerations apply, discuss:
Click or tap here to enter text.

PART 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES

Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)

Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were
removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth
from which it was excavated.

Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants.
If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials or provide the results of this evaluation in the
Vapor Mitigation Plan. Note that if vapor mitigation is planned for site buildings, utility corridors
will need to be evaluated as part of mitigation designs:
Click or tap here to enter text.

If no, include rationale here:
The project does not involve utility trenches. In addition, based on the prior site investigation
results, the contaminants of concern at the site are metals. As such, it is not anticipated that
vapor intrusion is a concern.

Unknown, details to be provided in the Vapor Mitigation Plan for site buildings

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Click or tap here to enter text.

PART 2. GROUNDWATER

1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
Approximately 30 feet below land surface.

2) What is the maximum depth of soil disturbance onsite?
Approximately 4 inches below base of existing concrete foundation slab (assumed to be
equivalent as current grade).

3) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by onsite offsite both or unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
According to previous environmental reports and as referenced in the Notice of Brownfields
Property (Appendix A), groundwaters are due to a former plating line area within the northern
portion of the facility building.
20
EMP Version 3, March 2023
4) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
Groundwater flows toward the north/northeast.

5) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities (e.g.
footer/utility construction or helical pilings?)
Yes No
If yes, describe these activities:
Click or tap here to enter text.
In the event that groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or sampling procedures).
Should groundwater be encountered within an excavation, it will be allowed to re-infiltrate for
approximately 24 hours, if it does not affect the construction schedule. If the groundwater
must be removed so that construction activities may proceed, the groundwater will be pumped
into a tanker or aboveground storage containers for temporary containerization. Terracon will
contact DEQ to determine an appropriate course of action, which may include sampling of the
containerized water to determine proper management and/or disposal.

6) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................Yes No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................Yes No

7) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.

Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Redevelopment Section intent to allow proper abandonment of
well(s) as specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active
monitoring through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
Location of existing monitoring wells marked
Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.

8) Please provide additional details as needed:

The existing monitoring wells (MW-4, MW-6, MW-7, and MW-8) are located outside, along the
northern exterior wall of the building, as depicted in Figure 3. The proposed slab renovations will
occur on the interior of the southern portion of the building and will not impact the monitoring wells.

21
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.

PART 3. SURFACE WATER
1) Is surface water present at the property? Yes No
2) If yes, attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? Yes No Unknown
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities or as part of the final redevelopment? Yes No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run off, stormwater impacts):
Not applicable. Surface water has not been identified on the site.

PART 4. SEDIMENT
1) Are sediment sources present on the property? Yes No
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated? Yes No Unknown
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? Yes No
4) Attach a map showing the location of known contaminated sediment at the property.

5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
Not applicable. Sediment sources have not been identified on the site.

PART 5. SOIL VAPOR

1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
Groundwater Exterior Soil Vapor Sub-Slab Soil Vapor
Residential Yes No
Unknown
Yes No Unknown Yes No Unknown
Commercial Yes No
Unknown
Yes No
Unknown
Yes No
Unknown

2) Attach a map showing the locations of all soil vapor samples including any soil vapor
contaminants that exceeds screening levels and overlays planned site development features.
22
EMP Version 3, March 2023

3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is exterior soil vapor known to be contaminated?

4) If applicable, at what depth(s) is sub slab soil vapor known to be contaminated?
0 6 inches Other, please describe:
Click or tap here to enter text.
5) Will workers encounter contaminated exterior or sub-slab soil vapor during planned
redevelopment activities? Yes No Unknown
In the event that apparent contaminated soil vapor is encountered (based on elevated PID
readings, unusual odors, etc.) during redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or
other subsurface work,) list activities for management of such contact, INCLUDING notification to
DEQ within 48 hours of identification of the issue for determination of additional requirements:
Based on the prior site investigation results, the contaminants of concern at the site are metals.
As such, it is not anticipated that construction workers will encounter volatile vapors from
beneath the slab during the renovation work. However, as a precautionary measure, Terracon
will be on-site during construction to provide ambient air screening services. Terracon will utilize
a PID to screen ambient air during the slab cuts and soil excavation work. Field screening with a
PID will be conducted during operation of petroleum-fueled equipment utilized to complete the
slab modifications (e.g. excavator, concrete-saw, skid-steers, etc.) to establish a background VOC
concentration. This background concentration may vary with time depending on the types and
amount of equipment in use at any given time. Terracon will update the apparent background
concentration on an as needed basis during the slab modifications and record the concentration
in its field documentation.

If PID readings greater than 25 parts per million (ppm) above background levels are identified,
work will be temporarily stopped so that further evaluation can be conducted. Work will not
begin again until the vapor field screening indicates concentrations have returned to
background levels. If necessary to continue work, temporary mitigation measures (e.g.
mechanical ventilation, air purifying units, the use of PPE for site workers, etc.) may be
implemented.

presence of contaminated soil vapors in excavations beneath the slab. If, during construction,
workers identify evidence of elevated vapor concentrations (odor, lightheadedness, etc.)
regardless of PID readings, work will be stopped until it is determined that it is safe to proceed.

DEQ will be notified of any work stoppages and mitigation measures implemented at the site
within 48 hours of their occurrence to discuss additional requirements that may be necessary.

Click or tap here to enter text.
23
EMP Version 3, March 2023
PART 6. INDOOR AIR

1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? Yes No
2) If applicable, attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site
screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? Yes No Unknown N/A

If no, include rationale here:
Click or tap here to enter text.
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:

VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM
1) Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
Yes No Unknown

If no or unknown, include rationale here as well as plans for pre-occupancy sampling, as
necessary:
Based on the prior site investigation results, the contaminants of concern at the site are metals.

If yes, VIMS Plan Attached or VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
Based on the prior site investigation results, the contaminants of concern at the site are metals. As
such, it is not anticipated that construction workers will encounter volatile vapors from beneath the
slab during the renovation work. However, as a precautionary measure, Terracon will be on-site
during construction to provide ambient air screening services. Terracon will utilize a PID to screen
ambient air during the slab cuts and soil excavation work. If PID readings greater than 25 parts per
million (ppm) above background levels are identified, work will be temporarily stopped so that
further evaluation can be conducted. Work will not begin again until the vapor field screening
indicates concentrations have returned to background levels. If necessary to continue work,
temporary mitigation measures (e.g. mechanical ventilation, air purifying units, the use of PPE for
site workers, etc.) may be implemented.

presence of contaminated soil vapors in excavations beneath the slab. If during construction, workers
identify evidence of elevated vapor concentrations (odor, lightheadedness, etc.) regardless of PID
readings, work will be stopped until it is determined that it is safe to proceed.

DEQ will be notified of any work stoppages and mitigation measures implemented at the site within
48 hours of their occurrence to discuss additional requirements that may be necessary.
24
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Click or tap here to enter text.

VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer and follow the DEQ
Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System Design Submittal
Requirements.

Note that approval of this EMP does not imply approval with any vapor intrusion mitigation land
use restrictions or requirements of the recorded or draft Brownfields Agreement and that
separate approval of mitigation measures will be required.

CONTINGENCY PLAN

In this section, please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields project manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields project manager will be notified, and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site-specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
Minimum Sample Requirements: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260;
EPA Method 8270; and Metals RCRA List +
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 6020/7199

Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (e.g. Herbicides)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Click or tap here to enter text.

Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.

Underground Storage Tanks Note that UST Section guidelines must be followed for sample
frequency during UST closure. Unless damage to onsite structures to remain as part of
redevelopment would occur, USTs shall be removed from the Brownfields Property:
25
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Should a UST(s) and/or related infrastructure be encountered during redevelopment activities, the
environmental manager (Terracon) will be contacted immediately, and the identified item should
remain as encountered. The DEQ Project Manager will be notified by the environmental manager
for the site within 48 hours of discovery. Following notification of the Brownfields Project Manager,
the UST or other containers will be removed from the ground after potential combustible vapors
have been stabilized. Residual fluids, if present, will be removed and sampled for VOCs, SVOCs, and
RCRA 8 metals. The fluids will be transported off-site for disposal at a suitable facility based on the
laboratory analytical results. The UST will be hauled to an off-site facility for proper disposal and soil
samples will be collected from the location of the UST and analyzed for VOCs (EPA Method 8260B),
SVOCs (EPA Method 8270D) and RCRA metals (EPA Methods 6010D and 7471B), in accordance with
the applicable DEQ UST Guidance and Brownfields Program protocols. Impacted soil, if
On-
as outlined above.

Documentation of the UST/container removal activities, UST disposal, and sampling results will be
provided to the Brownfields Project Manager upon receipt by the environmental manager.

Sub-Grade Feature/Pit:
If during redevelopment activities, an unknown sub-grade feature/pit is encountered, the
environmental manager will be notified immediately. The environmental manager (Terracon) will
screen soils adjacent to the feature for potential impacts. Please note that this field screening will
not be used to guide additional excavation and will be completed solely to assess possible risk
implications associated with those potential impacts. The minimum amount of soil excavation
d slab thicknesses will be conducted. The sub-grade feature
will not be removed if it is not necessary to do so in order to achieve the desired slab thickness or to
provide adequate structural support for the planned overlying slab. If necessary, a pit remaining in
place will be filled with virgin crushed stone in accordance with the protocols listed in Part 1B
above. If water is encountered within a sub-grade pit, the procedures outlined in Part 2 will be
followed.

If potential impacts are identified, the Brownfields Project Manager will be notified to discuss
whether the apparent nature of the impacts necessitates additional actions.

Buried Waste Material Note that if buried waste, non-native fill, or any obviously filled materials
is encountered, the DEQ Brownfields Redevelopment Section must be notified to determine if
investigation of landfill gases is required:
The below described protocols apply only to debris encountered during construction. Per
Brownfields requirement, due to the planned re-use, if debris is encountered, it must be removed.

If during redevelopment activities, buried waste materials are encountered, the environmental
manager (Terracon) will be notified immediately, and the identified waste should remain as
encountered. The Brownfields Project Manager will be notified by the environmental manager
within 24 hours of the environmental manager being notified. Following notification of the
26
EMP Version 3, March 2023
Brownfields Project Manager, the environmental manager will supervise exploratory excavation
activities near the waste and soils will be screened for potential impacts. The type of field screening
(i.e. for VOCs, for methane, etc.) will be determined by the apparent nature of the debris and
conversations with the DEQ Project Manager.

The waste will be segregated from surrounding soils, inventoried and evaluated for proper
management. If potential impacts are identified, the Brownfields Project Manager will be notified,
and soil samples will be collected from the area of potential impacts and analyzed for VOCs (EPA
Method 8260B), SVOCs (EPA Method 8270D) and RCRA metals (EPA Methods 6010D and 7471B).
The sample frequency will be determined based on the nature of the debris and will be discussed
with the Brownfields Project Manager prior to the collection of the samples, and a determination
will be made regarding the need for an investigation of landfill gases. Additional laboratory analyses
may be required based on the types of waste discovered. The location of the debris will be recorded
for future reference. Documentation of the waste management activities and sampling results will
be provided to the Brownfields Project Manager upon receipt by the environmental manager.

Re-Use of Impacted Soils Onsite:
Impacted soils will not be reused on site. If the stockpile sampling determines the excavated soils
are impacted, the soils will be disposed of off-site to an appropriate permitted facility in accordance
with the protocols outlined in Part 1C above.

If unknown, impacted soil is identified onsite, management onsite can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
project manager approval prior to final placement onsite.

If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
Click or tap here to enter text.

REPORTING

Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the project manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 8/31/2023

27
EMP Version 3, March 2023
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment-related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).

Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance Agreement.
29
EMP Version 3, March 2023

FIGURE 2 - PROPOSED SLAB MODIFICATIONS
AND SOIL EXCAVATION AREA
- Planned Concrete Repair Areas
(Require 6-inch thick refinished slab)
- Planned Vibration Isolation Pads
(Require 8-inch thick refinished slab)
- Existing Concrete Pits to be Filled with
Virgin Stone Material (No Excavation)
- Approximate area of Contaminated Soil,
per the recorded Notice of Brownfields
Property.
N
Map of Proposed Excavated Soil Re-Use Area FIGURE
NO.
@A @A
@A@A
Proposed Soil
Re-Use Area
Proposed Excavation
Areas (see Figure 2 for
Exact Locations)
MW-4 MW-6
MW-7
MW-8
NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
Legend
@A Monitoring Wells
Site Boundary
Tax Parcels
Environmental Management Plan
Canac Kitchens Brownfields Site
Dura Supreme Slab Modifications
NCBP ID# 09005-05-049
607 Meacham Road
Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina
2701 Westport Road Charlotte, North Carolina 28208
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
0 250 500125
Feet
PM:
Drawn By:
Checked By:
Approved By:
WOF
WOF
RSB
RSB
Project No:
Scale:
Filename:
Date:March 2023
71227537_EMP_3
1 inch = 250 feet
71237109
3

APPENDIX A