25008_North Hills Expansion_Ph I_20191031

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT North Hills - NHX Redevelopment Multiple Addresses Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina 27609 Prepared for: J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. 270 Park Avenue, 7th floor New York, New York 10017 Prepared by: Targus Associates, LLC 1900 Diplomat Drive Dallas, Texas 75234 [phone] Targus Project T19-4079 October 31, 2019
© 2019, Targus Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

October 31, 2019 J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. 270 Park Avenue, 7th floor New York, New York 10017
Attention: Mr. Phil Stasulli, Subject: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment North Hills - NHX Redevelopment Multiple Addresses Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina 27609 Targus Project T19-4079 Dear Mr. Stasulli: Targus Associates, LLC (Targus) is pleased to submit this report of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Additional Environmental Services for the North Hills - NHX Redevelopment property located in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina. This report discusses background information, purpose and scope of work, execution of work, and conclusions. ASTM E1527-13 states that an ESA “meeting or exceeding” this practice is presumed to be
valid if the report is being relied on by the user for whom the assessment was originally prepared and the following components were completed less than 180 days prior to the date of acquisition or intended transaction: interviews, searches for recorded environmental cleanup liens, regulatory review, site visit, and the declaration by the environmental professional responsible for the assessment. Based on this requirement, this report is presumed to be valid for 180 days after October 4, 2019.
We appreciate your selection of Targus for this project and look forward to assisting you further on other projects. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact either of the undersigned. Sincerely, Targus Associates, LLC
Christopher Davis Tommy Kim
Staff Professional Project Professional
M:\Projects\T19-4079 JPM North Hills NHX Redevelopment\Report Text\T19-4079 JPM North Hills Phase I ESA.docx
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Property Location and Legal Description ............................................................. 6 2.1.1 Current Use of the Property .......................................................................... 6 2.1.2 Descriptions of Improvements on the Subject Property ............................ 7 2.1.3 Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties ................................................... 7 2.2 Purpose .................................................................................................................. 7
2.3 Detailed Scope-of-Services ................................................................................... 9 2.4 Significant Assumptions ......................................................................................11 2.5 Limitations, Deviations and Exceptions ..............................................................11 2.6 Special Terms and Conditions .............................................................................12 2.7 User Reliance ........................................................................................................12 2.7.1 Third Party Reliance by Contract ............................................................... 12 3.0 USER-PROVIDED INFORMATION ...............................................................................12 3.1 Title Records .........................................................................................................14 3.2 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations ........................................14 3.3 Specialized Knowledge or Experience of the User .............................................14 3.4 Actual Knowledge of the User – User Questionnaire .........................................14 3.5 Reason for Significantly Lower Purchase Price .................................................15 3.6 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information ...........................15 3.7 Reasons for Performing Phase I ..........................................................................15 3.8 Other ......................................................................................................................15 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW .....................................................................................................15 4.1 Standard Federal, State, and Tribal Environmental Records .............................15 4.2 Additional Federal, State, Tribal, and Local Environmental Record Sources ...24 4.3 Physical Setting Source(s) ...................................................................................24 4.4 Historical Use Information on the Property .........................................................26 4.5 Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties ...........................................27 4.6 Jurisdiction ............................................................................................................28 4.7 Document Request ...............................................................................................28 4.8 Knowledge of Environmental Proceedings .........................................................28 4.9 Review of the Environmental Site Setting ...........................................................29 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ...........................................................................................29 5.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions ................................................................29 5.1.1 Areas Reviewed During the Site Visit ........................................................ 29 5.2 Observations .........................................................................................................29 5.2.1 General Subject Property Reconnaissance ............................................... 29 5.3 Prior Assessment Usage ......................................................................................33 5.4 Uses and Conditions ............................................................................................34 5.4.1 Environmental Compliance ........................................................................ 34 5.4.2 Evidence of Leaks or Spills ........................................................................ 34 5.4.3 Storage of Hazardous Substances ............................................................. 34 5.4.4 Mitigation Systems ...................................................................................... 34 6.0 INTERVIEWS ................................................................................................................34 7.0 EVALUATION ...............................................................................................................35 7.1 Findings .................................................................................................................35 7.2 Opinion ..................................................................................................................36 7.3 Additional Investigation ........................................................................................36
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page ii

7.4 Data Gaps and Deviations ....................................................................................36 7.5 Conclusions and Recommendations ...................................................................37 7.5.1 Non-ASTM Issues ........................................................................................ 38 7.6 Additional Services ..............................................................................................38
7.7 Limiting Conditions, Deviations, and Deletions .................................................38 7.8 References .............................................................................................................38 7.9 Signature of Environmental Professional ...........................................................39 7.10 Environmental Professional Statement .............................................................39 8.0 ADDITIONAL (NON-ASTM STANDARD) SERVICES ..................................................39 8.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials ............................................................................39 8.2 Biological Agents ..................................................................................................41 8.2.1 Legionella .................................................................................................... 41 8.3 Cultural and Historic Resources ..........................................................................41 8.4 Endangered Species .............................................................................................41 8.5 Indoor Air Quality ..................................................................................................42 8.6 Lead Based Paint ..................................................................................................42 8.7 Lead-In-Drinking Water .........................................................................................42 8.8 Mold / Microbial Growth ........................................................................................43 8.9 Radon .....................................................................................................................43 8.10 Regulatory Compliance ......................................................................................43 8.10.1 Potential for Environmental Liabilities ..................................................... 44
8.11 Wetlands ..............................................................................................................44 8.12 High-voltage Powerlines .....................................................................................44
Appendices Appendix A - Figures:
Topographic Map Site Plan Site (Vicinity) Map
Appendix B - Photographs Appendix C - Historical Research Documentation Appendix D - Regulatory Records Documentation Appendix E - Interview Documentation Appendix F - Qualifications of Environmental Professionals Appendix G - Information Requested from Client/Excerpts from Documents Provided by the Client or Others
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 1

1.0 SUMMARY
Client Name: JP Morgan Investment Management, Inc. Property Visit Date: October 10 and 11, 2019
Client Contact: Phil Stasulli Property Contact: Kallie Walker, Kane Realty Corporation
Project No.: T19-4079 Date of Construction: 1960s – JCPenney 2004 to 2008 – Remainder
Project Manager: Britt Blaylock No. Bldgs./Units: Six
Phone No.: [phone] No. of Stories: Between one and three stories except the Renaissance Hotel (nine stories) Email: [e-mail] Bldg. Square Footage: Not available
Property Name: North Hills - NHX Redevelopment Property Acreage: ~12
Property Address: Multiple Addresses Basement/Slab on grade: Slab-on grade and subgrade parking garage Property Town, County, State: Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina Property Use: Retail
Property Identification:
Assessor PIN Nos. 1705593807, 1705592477, 1705597841, 1705594776, 1705595377, and 1705595341
Property History: Undeveloped Land/ Single-family residences/ North Hills Mall
Other Improvements: See report text
FINDINGS
Report Section
Assessment Item No Further Investi-gation
HREC REC CREC VEC Non-ASTM Risk
Opinion of Probable Cost
4.1 Groundwater Contamination X (3) NA
4.1 Soil Contamination X
5.2 Stressed Vegetation X
5.2 Surficial Disturbance or
Staining X
4.1 USTs/LUSTs X
4.1, 4.4 ASTs X
5.2 PCBs (incl. ballasts) X
5.2 Petroleum X
5.2 Waste Generation/
Disposal Issues X
5.2 Operational Issues X
4.1 Nearby Property Issues X (1), (2) NA
4.1, 4.5 Adjacent Property Issues X
4.4, 4.5 Historical Issues X
4.4, 5.3 Previous Report Issues X
4.1 Regulatory Review Issues X
5.2 Chemical or Hazardous
Substance Issues X
8.5 Odors X
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 2

Report Section
Assessment Item No Further Investi-gation
HREC REC CREC VEC Non-ASTM Risk
Opinion of Probable Cost 8.1 ACMs (4) $148,500 budgeted
8.2 Biological Agents X
8.3 Cultural and Historic Resources X
8.4 Endangered Species X
8.5 Indoor Air Quality X
8.6 Lead-Based Paint X
8.7 Lead in Drinking Water X
8.8 Mold and Microbial Growth X
8.9 Radon X
8.10 Regulatory Compliance X
8.11 Wetlands X
8.0 JPM Additional Scope Items X
8.0 Other (as necessary,
including recommendations for other non-scope investigations)
X

HREC = Historical Recognized Environmental Condition REC = Recognized Environmental Condition CREC = Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition VEC = Vapor Encroachment Condition J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. (JPMIM) engaged Targus Associates, LLC
(Targus) to perform a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) and Additional Environmental Services of the North Hills - NHX Redevelopment property located in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina (subject property). The subject property encompassed approximately 12 acres of land that was improved with six buildings utilized as part of an outdoor retail mall with restaurants. Construction and/ or renovations of an original 1960s era building (JCPenney’s) were completed from 2004 to 2009. The remainder of the buildings were constructed between 2004 and 2008. Private roads were located on-site and adjoining to the subject property as part of the shopping center. These roads included The Circle at North Hills Street, Main at North Hills Street, and Lassiter at North Hills Avenue. It should be noted that Targus previously prepared a Phase I ESA for JPMIM in 2013 that included the subject property. Information from the previous Phase I ESA was also utilized to prepare this
Phase I ESA. Based on the information obtained to date, Targus' findings, opinion, and conclusions are as
follows: 1.) A former Firestone automotive repair facility was located within approximately 280 feet to
the northeast and up-gradient of the subject property; this area is presently a parking lot. This facility operated between the early 1960s and 2004 and utilized 14 hydraulic lifts, a 200-gallon gasoline underground storage tank (UST), and a 550-gallon used oil UST. The USTs and hydraulic lifts were removed, the building razed, and release incidents closed by the North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources (DENR) via No Further Action (NFA) letters. Subsurface impact to soil and/or groundwater from the Firestone activities was reported to have been localized to the Firestone property.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 3

Additionally, extensive groundwater sampling efforts in relation to a nearby Exxon and/or former Brothers Cleaners (both discussed below) included wells in the immediate vicinity
of the former Firestone. No material impact to groundwater that did not appear attributable to the Exxon or Brothers facilities was reported in available documents. Based on distance, the cessation of operations, regulatory closure, interviews, and groundwater sampling efforts in the immediate vicinity; Targus does not consider the former Firestone a recognized environmental condition. 2.) The North Hills Exxon (Exxon) was located was located approximately 450 feet northeast and up-gradient of the subject property. A release from this facility resulted in an area wide (including the subject property) groundwater impact by petroleum volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Numerous prior assessments and subsurface investigations have been conducted for the Exxon. Remedial efforts included groundwater monitoring, soil
vapor extraction (SVE), and air sparging (AS). Kane Realty (Kane) provided a copy of the
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report by Mid-Atlantic Associates (Mid-Atlantic) that was reviewed by the DENR prior to issuing a NFA letter. Free product was
no longer detected in the monitoring wells for at least four consecutive quarters. Review of the latest available annual groundwater sampling results (dated March to October 2014), indicated that the groundwater contamination was still present at the facility and at
least one constituent (MTBE) was under the subject property. However, in May 2015, the DENR issued a NFA letter for the release acknowledging that even though groundwater contamination exceeded the groundwater quality standards and was not suitable for use as water supply, concentrations met cleanup requirements for a low-risk site. Review of available resources has not identified occupants or operations on the subject property that would appear likely to have contributed to the groundwater impact. Targus considers the former Exxon, and the associated petroleum compounds in groundwater to present a
historical recognized environmental condition. 3.) A former Brothers Cleaner (4221 Six Forks Road) was located approximately 900 feet north/northeast and up-gradient of the subject property. This location was a parking lot
during Targus’ recent area reconnaissance. The former Brothers Cleaners incurred a release incident that resulted in a plume of chlorinated VOCs in groundwater that have migrated beneath the area including the subject property. According to Mr. Mike Cunningham, the project manager for the Brothers Cleaners’ case who is with the Dry-Cleaning Solvent Program (DSCA) of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NC DEQ), the case is considered fully assessed; however, they will not be issuing
a NFA letter at this time and they will continue to monitor the groundwater. Mr. Cunningham acknowledged that there is still tetrachloroethylene (PCE) exceedances beneath the subject property. However, because of the relatively low levels, he indicated that it does not appear that vapor intrusion would be a concern for commercial use based on the groundwater and/or soil gas concentrations collected as recently as February 2019. Because the case is not closed out, the agency has not imposed land use restrictions in area, except that North Carolina prohibits installation of water supply wells in areas of known groundwater contamination. The responsible party has been identified for this off-site release and active monitoring of the release incident is on-going under the supervision DEQ. Review of available resources has not identified occupants or operations on the subject property that would appear likely to have contributed to the groundwater impact.
Targus considers the former Brothers Cleaners, and the associated hazardous substances in groundwater beneath the subject property present a recognized environmental condition.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 4

In accordance with the proposed scope of work, Targus included certain non-ASTM scope considerations as enumerated in Section 8.0. Asbestos is discussed further below.
4.) The JCPenney store and associated parking structure was constructed in the 1960s. Suspect ACM observed in the on-site buildings on the day of the assessment included various wall and ceiling systems (including wallboard, joint compound and texture), flooring system (tiles/ carpet) and associated mastic, caulking, pipe insulation, and ceiling tiles. On the exterior of the improvements Targus observed suspect ACM including roofing materials and stucco plaster. The suspect ACM was observed by Targus to be in good condition and non-friable except for the ceiling tiles which were in good condition. Regardless of past renovations and in the absence of data to the contrary, Targus cannot rule out ACM remaining at the subject property. Targus understands that the JCPenney structure is planned to be demolished in the near future and the developer has budgeted
for asbestos sampling and/or abatement. Based on the good condition of the suspect ACM identified and because a budget for ACM abatement appear to have been established, asbestos is not considered to be a business environmental risk to the subject property at
this time. ASTM Issues
Targus has performed a Phase I ESA of the North Hills - NHX Redevelopment property located in North Hills Avenue in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-13 and the authorized scope of work. Exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 7.4 of this report. Based upon the information obtained, as reflected in this report, this assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property except as follows:
• Chlorinated solvent-impacted groundwater that has migrated under the subject property as a result of operations by the former Brothers Cleaners. Targus understands that the subject property will be redeveloped for continued commercial use. Given the presence of contaminated groundwater beneath the subject property and in
the area, if groundwater is encountered during the redevelopment, it should be managed in accordance with local and federal regulations to prevent potential discharge of impacted materials. If existing monitoring wells on the subject property will be affected by the
redevelopment activities, they will need to be plugged and abandoned in accordance with regulations. It should also be noted that the DEQ may require reinstallation of these wells at a later time.
In addition, although vapor sampling has been conducted in select locations on the subject property and interview with the DSCA representative suggested vapor intrusion is unlikely, Targus recommends the potential for vapor intrusion conditions (present or future) be considered as part of the redevelopment. Future construction considerations to mitigate vapor concerns may include installation of a passive vapor mitigation system, installation of vapor barriers, or similar alternatives.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 5

Non-ASTM Issues
In accordance with the proposed scope of work, Targus conducted additional environmental services as discussed in Section 8.0 of this report. Based on Targus’ understanding of the Client’s objectives, risk tolerance, and plans for the subject property, this assessment/review did not identify business environmental risk associated with the additional environmental services performed; however, this conclusion is specifically conditional on proper future management of confirmed or suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) in accordance with applicable regulations. It is Targus’ opinion that obtaining additional information is not warranted to better evaluate these business environmental risks.
This summary is for convenience only and should not be relied upon without first reading the full contents of this report, including appendix materials1.

1 Irrespective of verb tense used in the text, this report is considered to be written and effective as of the date of the site visit.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 6

2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1 PROPERTY LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property was located at the northeastern corner of Lassiter Mill Road and Interstate 440 (multiple addresses - see below) in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina. Figures depicting the subject property are in the appendices. A survey for the subject property was provided by Kane. Except for the western boundary, the boundaries indicated on Targus’ site plan were identified on the provided survey and confirmed by Kane. Communication with JPMIM identified the eastern side of Lassiter Mill Road as the appropriate western boundary for the subject property. 2.1.1 Current Use of the Property
The subject property encompassed part of the North Hills Mall, an outdoor retail mall with multiple restaurants. In addition, it encompassed the western part of the Renaissance Hotel.
Other improvements include surface parking lots, subgrade parking, and landscaped areas. The following is a list of the retail businesses that are located on-site within the North Hills Mall District:

SREC-Suspect recognized environmental condition
Tenant List
Address/ Suite Number Tenant Description of Activities SREC Y/N If Yes, Section Discussed
4100 Main at North Hills Street
4100-114 Mia Francesca Restaurant N
4100 Renaissance Hotel Hotel N
4151 Main at North Hills Street
4151-100 Sunglass Hut Retail N
4151-103 Paper Source Retail N
4151-105 Lou & Grey Retail N
4151-115 Anthropologie Retail N 4151-120 Paysage Home Retail N 4321 Lassiter at North Hills Avenue
4321-100 Kendra Scott Retail N
4321-105 Bonobos Retail N
4321-110 Southern Tide Retail N
4321-115 Fleur Retail N
4321-120 Fink’s Jewelers Retail N
4361 Lassiter at North Hills Avenue
4361-110 Viva Chicken North Hills Restaurant N
4361-105 Peter Millar Retail N 4361-100 Vacant Vacant N
4217 Six Forks Road
4217-100 JCPenney’s Retail Y Section 4.1
4381 Lassiter Mill Road
4381-100 Ruth’s Chris Steak House Restaurant N
4381-105 South Moon Under Retail N
4121 Main at North Hills Street
4121-100 Mason’s Famous Lobster Rolls Restaurant N
4121-105 Bartaco Restaurant N
4121-110 Mura Restaurant N
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 7

2.1.2 Descriptions of Improvements on the Subject Property
The subject property encompassed approximately 12 acres of land that was improved with six buildings utilized as part of an outdoor retail mall with restaurants. Construction and/ or renovations of original 1960s era building (JCPenney’s) were completed from 2004 to 2009. The remainder of the buildings were constructed between 2004 and 2008. The subject property consisted of private roads that were located on-site and adjoining. These roads included The Circle at North Hills Street, Main at North Hills Street, and Lassiter at North Hills Avenue. 2.1.3 Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties
Observed uses of adjoining properties are discussed as follows according to their respective geographic relationship to the subject property. Historical use of the adjoining properties is discussed in Section 4.5.
North The subject property was bordered to the north by Lassiter Mill road followed by the Alexan
Apartment (Alexan) development. The Alexan development included ground floor retail spaces that were occupied by Quail Ridge Books, Good Chandler, Relax the Back, The Spectacle, Von Kekel, Vivace, Quintessentials, J.M. Laughlin, Lamb’s Ear, Paperbuzz, Fleur, and Uniquities. Northeast The subject property was bordered to the northeast by multi-tenant retail buildings that were occupied (from northwest to southeast) by Ethan Allen, Moe’s Southwest Grill, Beyondblue, Liles Clothing Studio, Charlotte’s Jewelry & Gifts, Lily Rain, Blue Mercury, Vineyard Vines, and Firebirds Wood Fired Grill. East/ Southeast The subject property was bordered to the southeast by multi-tenant retail buildings that were occupied (from north to south) by Monkee’s, Starbucks, Ben and Jerry’s, Brighton, Scout and
Molly’s, Copper Penny, Smoothie King, Fitness Connection, Lou, Marta’s and part of the Renaissance Hotel.
South The subject property was bordered to the south by Interstate 440, followed by single-family residences.
West The subject property was bordered to the west by Lassiter Mill Road, followed by (from south to north) single family residences 2.2 PURPOSE The purpose of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was to identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. As defined by ASTM E1527-13, “The term recognized environmental conditions means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any
release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 8

(3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.” The presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products considers substances present in
any form or phase, whether solid, liquid, or gas, at the surface or subsurface in soil, water, or vapor. The term historical recognized environmental condition applies to “a past release of any
hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the
property to any required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). Before calling the past release a
historical recognized environmental condition, the environmental professional [EP] must determine whether the past release is a recognized environmental condition at the time the
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is conducted (for example, if there has been a change in the regulatory criteria). If the EP considers the past release to be a recognized environmental condition at the time the Phase I ESA is conducted, the condition shall be
included in the conclusions section of the report as a recognized environmental condition.” Similarly, a controlled recognized environmental condition is “a recognized environmental
condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (for example, as evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria established by regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). A condition considered by the environmental professional to be a controlled recognized
environmental condition shall be listed in the findings section of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report, and as a recognized environmental condition in the conclusions section of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report.” A de minimis condition is “a condition that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Conditions determined to be
de minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions nor controlled recognized
environmental conditions.”
The term suspect recognized environmental condition as used throughout this report is cited from Section 12.5 of ASTM E1527-13. Targus uses this term for conditions that have a potential to be known recognized environmental conditions, controlled recognized
environmental conditions, historical recognized environmental conditions, or de minimis
conditions and warrants further discussion as presented within the text of this report. Section 7.0 summarizes each of the known or suspect recognized environmental conditions associated with the subject property and presents Targus’ opinion of the potential impact a known or suspect recognized environmental condition has on the subject property and whether or not the suspect recognized environmental condition is currently a de minimis condition, a recognized environmental condition, a controlled recognized environmental
condition or a historical recognized environmental condition, based on site-specific characteristics. ASTM E1527-13 states that an ESA “meeting or exceeding” this practice is presumed to be
valid if the report is being relied on by the user for whom the assessment was originally
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 9

prepared and the following components were completed less than 180 days prior to the date of acquisition or intended transaction: interviews, searches for recorded environmental
cleanup liens, regulatory review, site visit, and the declaration by the environmental professional responsible for the assessment. The ASTM E1527-13 practice also states that within this 180-day period, if the assessment will be used by a user different than whom the assessment was originally prepared, the subsequent user must also satisfy the user’s responsibilities. 2.3 DETAILED SCOPE-OF-SERVICES The scope of services was performed in general conformance with the ASTM E 1527-13 document Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessment: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process2 and Client-specified requirements (see Section 2.6).
The Phase I ESA consisted of a historical review of the subject property and area use, regulatory database review, assessment of the physical setting, subject property and area
reconnaissance, and a report of Targus’ findings, opinions, and conclusions. Data gaps or deviations from this standard, if applicable, are described in Section 7.4.
Subject Property and Area Use Using selected sources of reasonably ascertainable public information, Targus attempted to review the current and historical uses of the subject property. The Phase I ESA historical review extends back until 1940 or, for uses prior to that date, back to the time the subject property was undeveloped. Sources of historical use information relating to the subject property and its adjoining properties were acquired and reviewed according to the reasonable availability of the information, the time limits provided for data acquisition and review, as permitted, by the project schedule and cost, and Targus’ judgment of the likely value of the information for indicating environmental conditions. Historical sources reviewed by Targus are listed in Section 7.8 and typically include local city directories, aerial photographs, and a topographic map. If available through the database provider, the historical sources reviewed also included Fire Insurance Maps.
Regulatory Status Review Targus reviewed a report of select regulatory databases published for the local area to identify
facilities potentially constituting a suspect recognized environmental condition in regard to the subject property. Targus reviewed the databases to identify recorded facilities located on, or in proximity to, the subject property using the ASTM E 1527-13 standard environmental record
sources and recommended approximate minimum search distances. Targus attempted to obtain additional information regarding listed facilities that, in its professional judgment, may constitute recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. In addition, local agencies were contacted regarding recorded information, incidents, or activities of environmental concern relating to the subject property and its immediate environs.

2 ASTM E 1527-13 is incorporated by reference; Targus can assist the Client with obtaining a copy upon request. It should be noted that the ASTM standard is not intended to represent or replace the standard of care by which the adequacy of a given professional service must be judged, nor should the document be applied without consideration of a project's many unique aspects. The word “Standard” in the title of the document means only that the document has been approved through the ASTM consensus process.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 10

Subject Property Physical Setting
Targus obtained and reviewed reasonably ascertainable published subject property information to characterize the physical setting of the subject property. Sources reviewed are listed in Section 7.8 of this report. If reasonably ascertainable, Targus reviewed the current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map showing the area on which the subject property is located. Targus reviewed one or more physical setting sources at the discretion of the environmental professional to obtain information about the geological, hydrogeological, hydrological, or topographical characteristics of the subject property. Discretionary physical setting sources may have been sought if (1) conditions had been identified in which hazardous substances or petroleum products are likely to be present on-site or to migrate to the subject property from off-site sources and (2) more information is generally obtained, pursuant to local good
commercial or customary practice. Subject Property and Area Reconnaissance
The site reconnaissance consisted of field observations of the subject property and adjoining land areas by Targus personnel experienced in environmental site assessments. Targus
observed and documented current uses of the subject property and indicators of hazardous substances, petroleum products, storage tanks, odors, pools of liquid, drums, containers, liquid PCBs, heating and cooling systems, stains, corrosion, drains and sumps, pits, ponds, lagoons, stressed vegetation, wastes, wells, and septic systems. The area reconnaissance was performed on foot within areas that were reasonably accessible and at Targus’ discretion by automobile along publicly accessible roads. Non-ASTM Issues As requested by the Client, Targus included certain non-ASTM scope considerations in an attempt to identify business environmental risk associated with the subject property. As defined by ASTM E 1527-13, the term business environmental risk is a potential environmental condition or environmentally-driven financial impact that could materially affect the current or planned use of the subject property. These conditions are not necessarily limited
to those environmental issues required to be assessed under ASTM E 1527-13. Rather, consideration of business environmental risk typically is associated with one or more Client-specified, non-ASTM scope assessment activities such as described in Section 8.0 of this
report. Report
Targus has prepared this report, which includes the findings concerning known or suspect recognized environmental conditions and an opinion as to the potential impact those conditions would have on the subject property. Targus’ services also included assessment of
recognized environmental conditions or other issues that may constitute potential business environmental risks at the time of the Phase I ESA. Finally, this report concludes whether or not the assessment revealed recognized environmental conditions, or business environmental risks, and provides recommendations, if appropriate.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 11

2.4 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS
Targus relied on information obtained from the Client, the Client’s representative, individuals interviewed, and prior environmental reports unless Targus’ reasonable inquiries clearly revealed otherwise3. Conditions observed were considered to be representative of areas that were not observed unless otherwise indicated. Explanation of our understanding of groundwater can be found in Section 4.3 2.5 LIMITATIONS, DEVIATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS
The findings and opinions presented are relative to the dates the work was conducted and should not be relied on to represent conditions at later dates. The opinions included herein are based on information obtained during the assessment and Targus' experience. If
additional information becomes available that may impact Targus' environmental assessment findings, Targus requests the opportunity to review the information, reassess the potential concerns, and modify Targus' opinions, if warranted.
This assessment included visual observations to identify obvious features or conditions indicative of recognized environmental conditions. Although this assessment has attempted to identify recognized environmental conditions, Targus cannot eliminate all uncertainty as to recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property nor represent or warrant that the subject property contains no hazardous substances or petroleum products or other latent conditions beyond those identified through the scope of work identified herein. Other features, conditions, and constituents may have escaped detection due to: (1) the limited scope of this assessment as driven by Client objectives, (2) the inaccuracy of public records, (3) environmental incidents
that may have gone undetected or unreported prior to this assessment, (4) inaccessible areas, and/or (5) deliberate concealment of detrimental information.
Although this assessment has attempted to identify business environmental risk, potential
business environmental risk may have escaped detection due to: (1) the limited scope of this assessment, (2) the inaccuracy of public records, (3) the presence of undetected or
unreported environmental incidents, (4) inaccessible areas, (5) deliberate concealment of detrimental information, (6) the subjective nature of materiality to the user with respect to business environmental risk, (7) a lack of understanding of the future use of the subject property, and/or (8) the limited degree of the current state of knowledge for certain non-ASTM scope items.
Targus' professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar conditions, by reputable environmental consultants undertaking similar studies and practicing in this locality during the same timeframe. No other
warranty, express or implied, is intended or made with respect to this report or Targus’ services. This assessment was not exhaustive and users of this report should consider the scope and limitations related to these services when developing opinions as to risks associated with the subject property. These potential risks may be more thoroughly evaluated
3 Pursuant to ASTM E1527-13 Section 7.5.2.1.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 12

as an additional service in an effort to further reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty. Upon request Targus can provide options for additional research or assessment and anticipated
additional cost and timing requirements. This report presents an assessment of the subject property as defined by information provided by the Client, Client’s representative, or Key Site Manager. Targus’ findings, opinions, and conclusions are based on the locations and boundaries of the subject property as evident in the field and on maps or plats provided by the Client, Client’s representative, or Key Site Manager. 2.6 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS The work was conducted in general conformance with JP Morgan Environmental Site
Assessment Work Order – Exhibit A, dated October 4, 2019 (Targus Proposal P19-5895) and the terms and conditions established therein. The User of this Phase I ESA is Targus’ Client, JPMIM.
There are no special terms and conditions between the user and Environmental Professional.
2.7 USER RELIANCE This report represents Targus’ services as of the date hereof. As Targus’ final document, it may not be altered after final issuance. This assessment and report were prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of JPMIM solely for its use and reliance, subject to the terms and conditions agreed upon between Targus and JPMIM. The Client and Targus were solely involved in shaping the scope of services. Accordingly, reliance on this report by any other party may involve assumptions leading to an unintended interpretation of findings and opinions. As such, reliance by other parties on the contents of this document is not granted, and any such reliance shall be at the sole risk of the using party. With the consent of Targus and the Client and for a fee, Targus may offer reliance to third parties or contract with other parties to develop findings and opinions related to such party’s specific risk management objectives. Except as otherwise agreed in writing, any and all third-party reliance upon this Phase I ESA shall be subject to the terms in Targus’ standard Terms and Conditions; the
$50,000 liability limitation listed in Targus’ standard Terms and Conditions (available upon request) constitutes Targus’ aggregate liability to any and all relying third parties for any and all claims.
2.7.1 Third Party Reliance by Contract Client retains the right, at no additional cost, to provide this report to affiliates, successors, assigns, lenders and third parties for use and Targus agrees that such parties at no additional cost, shall have the right to rely on information provided within the report, subject to the terms of the Master Service Agreement between Targus and JPMIM. 3.0 USER-PROVIDED INFORMATION ASTM E 1527-13 requires that the environmental professional request from the user of the Phase I ESA, the Client, certain information (discussed as follows) concerning the subject property that will help identify the possibility of recognized environmental conditions in
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 13

connection with the subject property or to request from the user the names of other individuals who can provide this information.
To meet the requirements of 40 CFR 312.20 and 312.25, a search for the existence of environmental liens and AULs that are filed or recorded against the property must be conducted. ASTM E 1527-13 assigns to the Client or its representative the responsibility to report to the environmental professional any environmental liens or AULs4 (including institutional controls, physical or engineered controls, land use restrictions, restrictive covenants, easements, etc.) known to it. That practice does not impose on the environmental
professional the responsibility to undertake a review of recorded land title records and judicial records for environmental liens and AULs. The user should either: (1) engage a title company, real estate attorney, or title professional to undertake a review of reasonably ascertainable recorded land title records and lien records for environmental liens and AULs recorded against
or relating to the property, or (2) negotiate such an engagement of a title company, real estate attorney, or title professional as an addition to the scope of work of the environmental professional. The search for environmental liens and AULs is in addition to the environmental
professional’s search of institutional control and engineering control registries. Depending on available information and specific site conditions, Targus may conclude that
the failure of the user to provide environmental lien/AUL search documentation does not present a significant data gap and therefore, can declare that Targus has developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. However, failure of the user to provide the information or to engage the environmental consultant or others to obtain and consider that information may separately weaken a defense to liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). If the Client or its representative is aware of specialized knowledge or experience that is material to the identification of recognized environmental conditions, or if it has actual knowledge that the purchase price of the subject property is significantly less than the
purchase price of comparable properties, ASTM E 1527-13 assigns to the Client the obligation to communicate that information to the environmental professional prior to the site reconnaissance. ASTM E 1527-13 requires that an explanation of a significant decrease in
purchase price be provided in writing. ASTM E 1527-13 assigns to the Client or its representative the responsibility to inform the
environmental professional of the reason it wants the Phase I ESA performed and to provide commonly known, reasonably available information about the subject property that is material to recognized environmental conditions. Absent information to the contrary, the purpose for assessment is assumed to be in preparation for a commercial real estate transaction. As part of Targus’ engagement to conduct this work, this information was requested from JPMIM or its representative. In addition, Targus has requested from JPMIM or its representative helpful documents such as those specified in Section 10.8 of ASTM E 1527-13 and as listed in the appendices. Finally, Targus inquired whether JPMIM or its representative was aware of: (1) any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property; (2) any pending,
4 See ASTM E2091 for additional information about activity and use limitations (AULs), their use and function, and standard means to check for existence and evaluate compliance with these controls. TARGUS can assist the Client with obtaining a copy on request.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 14

threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the subject property; or (3) any notices from governmental
entities regarding possible violations of environmental laws or possible liabilities relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products. Information known to and reported by the Client and provided at the time of authorization is discussed below in Sections 3.1 through 3.8. Information provided by others is discussed in Section 6.0. Information and excerpts from reports provided by JPMIM, its representative, or others are included in the Appendices of this report and are listed in Section 7.8. 3.1 TITLE RECORDS JPMIM or its representative did not provide Targus with title records that documented the
chain of historical ownership. However, at the request of JPMIM, Targus obtained chains-of-title from Texas Environmental Research. Available information indicated that the subject property was owned from prior to 1939 until present by various individuals and business
entities. Available information did not document prior occupants or use that indicated suspect
recognized environmental conditions.
3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS No information indicative of environmental liens, AULs, or governmental notification relating to past or recurrent violations of environmental laws with respect to the subject property was reported to Targus by JPMIM or its representative. However, at the request of JPMIM, Targus obtained an environmental lien/ AUL search from Texas Environmental Research. According to the search, no environmental liens/AULs were identified for the subject property. A copy of the environmental lien/ AUL search has been included in the appendices. It should be noted that there is known groundwater impact in the area of and under the subject property. The groundwater impacts originated from the off-site Exxon and former Brothers Cleaners. Both facilities are further discussed in Section 4.1. Although the DEQ has not imposed land use restrictions in the area, North Carolina prohibits installation of water supply wells in areas of known groundwater contamination.
3.3 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE OR EXPERIENCE OF THE USER
Specialized environmental knowledge or experience indicative of possible recognized
environmental conditions in connection with the subject property was reported to Targus by JPMIM or its representative.
3.4 ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE USER – USER QUESTIONNAIRE JPMIM was not aware of pending, threatened, or past litigation or administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in connection with the subject property. Additionally, JPMIM was not aware of notices from any governmental entity regarding possible violations of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products in connection with the subject property. No knowledge of environmental cleanup liens against the property or AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional controls was reported.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 15

3.5 REASON FOR SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER PURCHASE PRICE
No information indicating that the purchase price of the subject property was significantly less than the purchase price of comparable properties was reported to Targus at the project outset by JPMIM or its representative. 3.6 COMMONLY KNOWN OR REASONABLY ASCERTAINABLE INFORMATION No commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the subject property within the local community that was material to recognized environmental conditions was reported to Targus at the project outset JPMIM or its representative. 3.7 REASONS FOR PERFORMING PHASE I
Targus understands this assessment was required prior to the proposed acquisition of an interest in the subject property. Targus understands that the purpose of this assessment was
to complete an evaluation that meets the applicable standard of “all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses of the subject property consistent with good commercial or customary practice” with the objective of assembling documentation that may help to support
one of the threshold criteria for satisfying one or more defenses to CERCLA liability (landowner liability protections5) and to assist the Client in understanding potential environmental conditions that could materially impact the operation of the business associated with the subject property (business environmental risk). 3.8 OTHER Other information that was provided is listed in Section 7.8 and is discussed throughout this report in applicable sections. 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW 4.1 STANDARD FEDERAL, STATE, AND TRIBAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Targus reviewed selected federal, state, and local regulatory information in an attempt to identify recorded information concerning environmental impacts or conditions or concerns
associated with the subject property. Targus reviewed the regulatory report included in the following table as obtained from a third party database search provider. Pertinent sections of the database report are attached in the appendices, including a listing of the databases, an
explanation of each database, and figures depicting the approximate locations of regulated facilities in the near vicinity of the subject property. Regulatory listings are limited and include only those facilities or incidents that are known to the regulatory agencies at the time of publication to be contaminated, in the process of evaluation for potential contamination, or to store/ generate potentially hazardous substances, waste, or petroleum. Those listings are compiled by the third-party information services

5 Landowner liability protections (LLPs) include the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, and bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on CERCLA liability; see CERCLA (1980), SARA (1986), “Lender Liability Act” (1996), and “Brownfields Amendments” (2001).
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 16

provider engaged by Targus, who is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of its work product.
Federal, State, and Tribal Lists The following table includes the approximate minimum search distances and a list of the databases reviewed. These databases were selected based on minimum requirements of ASTM E 1527-13. The search distances in the third-party regulatory database report were extended by 1.5 miles due to the size of the subject property. The number of facilities indicates the number of regulated facilities identified by the database provider to be present within the approximate minimum search distance for a particular database.
ASTM FEDERAL, STATE, & TRIBAL DATABASE LISTS
Database Approximate Minimum Search Distance * No. of Facilities
NPL/Equivalents One Mile 0
Delisted NPL One-half Mile 0
SEMS (formerly CERCLIS)/ Equivalents One-half Mile 0 SEMS-ARCHIVE (Formerly CERC-NFRAP) Sites One-half Mile 0 CORRACTS or Violators/ Enforcement One Mile 0
RCRA Generators Subject Property and Adjoining 0 RCRA TSD Facilities One-half Mile 0 ERNS Subject Property 0
SHWS One Mile 0 SWF/LF Report One-half Mile 0 LUST List (including LTANKS or LPST) One-half Mile 15 UST List Subject Property and Adjoining 0 VCP List One-half Mile 0 AST Subject Property and Adjoining 0 LIENS Subject Property 0
Drycleaners One-Quarter Mile 2 AUL Subject Property and Adjoining 0 Institutional Control/ Engineering Control Registries Subject Property and Adjoining 3
Brownfields Sites One-half Mile 0
*If a facility was listed more than once on a particular database, it was counted as one facility for the purposes of this table. Targus reviewed the regulatory information provided in the database report to identify listed
facilities located within the approximate minimum search distances. The subject property was listed in the regulatory database report as discussed below.
Significant off-site facilities identified are included in the following table along with their distance from the subject property, the regulatory database on which the facility was listed, the apparent hydrological relationship to the subject property, information provided in the
database report, Targus’ observation of the facility during the area reconnaissance (if pertinent) and/or comments, and whether or not the facility was considered to be a suspect recognized environmental condition to the subject property. Additional facilities may have
been identified by the database provider but not presented as follows based on Targus’ judgment of significance. Those facilities are documented for reference by the reader in the appended report.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 17

Facility Information Apparent Hydrologic Relationship Database Information Additional Information SREC? (Y/N)
North Hills Mall 4217 Six Forks Road Subject Property
On-site RCRA NonGen (Non-Generator)/ NLR/ FINDS/ ECHO:
• Classification: Non-Generator
• Historical Generators: Large Quantity Generator (LQG) – 2004; Not a generator – 2003; and Conditionally-Exempt Small Quantity Generator (CESQG) – 1993
• Violation Status: No Violations Found BROWNFIELDS:
• No pertinent details were provided.
Also identified on the orphan list at North Hills Shopping Center. See discussion below.
Y
JCPenney ASBESTOS
• Approximately 2,215 SF of asbestos was removed in 2015. Firestone Store 100 North Hills South ~280 feet NE
Cross- to Up-gradient UST:
• 1/ 550-gallon UST/ oil, new/used/mix/ installed date: 03-16-1968/ removed 03-29-1996/ construction: single wall steel LUST/ IMD: • Date occurred: 07-01-1983
• Contamination Type: Groundwater
• Incident Description: Gasoline dispenser
• Material: gasoline/diesel • Source: Leak – Underground
• Incident Phase: closed out Soil cleaned up to residential standard
Also identified as 4305 Six Forks Road. See discussion below.
Y
Target Store 4191 The Circle at North Hills ~325 feet SE
Cross- to Down-gradient
RCRA-LQG:
• Classification: Large Quantity Generator (LQG) • Historical Generators: LQG (2011) and CESQG (2006)
• Hazardous Waste Summary: ignitable hazardous wastes, corrosive hazardous waste, arsenic, barium, various metals, etc. Compliance reviews for 2011, 2012, 2015, and 2017 did not identify violations at the facility
Target Store is a retail facility with a grocery store and limited quantities of hazardous substance for sale or use at the facility. The facility does not have an automotive repair department, and waste generation is expected to be related to photo development and/or disposal of off-spec or damaged products.
N
North Hills Exxon Service 4359 Six Forks Road ~450 feet NE
Up-gradient UST/ Financial Assurance
• 1/ 4,000-gallon UST/ gasoline-gas mix/ installed: 04-05-1976/ removed 10-30-1986/ construction: single wall steel
• 1/ 10,000-gallon UST/ gasoline-gas mix/ installed: 04-04-1974/ temporarily closed/ construction: single wall steel
• 1/ 10,000-gallon UST/ gasoline-gas mix/ installed: 01-01-1986/ status: current/ construction: single wall FRP
• 1/ 10,000-gallon UST/ gasoline-gas mix/ installed: 04-05-1976/ removed 10-30-1986/ construction: single wall steel
• 1/ 12,000-gallon UST/ gasoline-gas mix/ installed: 01-01-1986/ status: current/ construction: single wall FRP
• 1/ 3,000-gallon UST/ gasoline-gas mix/ installed: 04-05-1976/ removed 10-30-1986/ construction: single wall steel
See discussion below Y
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 18

Facility Information Apparent Hydrologic Relationship Database Information Additional Information SREC? (Y/N)
• 1/ 8,000-gallon UST/ gasoline-gas mix/ installed: 01-01-1988/ status: current/ construction: single wall FRP
• 1/ 3,000-gallon UST/ diesel/ installed: 04-05-1976/ removed 10-30-1986/ construction: single wall steel
• 1/ 10,000-gallon UST/ fuel oil/ installed: 01-01-1988/ status: current/ construction: single wall FRP
• 1/ 8,000-gallon UST/ gasoline-gas mix/ installed: 04-05-1978/ removed 10-30-1986/ construction: single wall steel
• 1/ 500-gallon UST/ oil, new/used/mix/ installed: 01-01-1988/ status: current/ construction: single wall FRP LUST/ RGA LUST/ LUST TRUST/ IMD:
• Date Occurred: 04-17-1998
• Date Closed: 05-15-2015 • Contamination Type: Groundwater • Product Type: Petroleum
• Corrective Action Plan Type: Air sparging and soil vapor extraction
• Incident Description: There was free product in 3 monitoring wells INST CONTROL:
• No Further Action with media restrictions RCRA-CESQG, FINDS:
• Classification: Conditionally-Exempt Small Quantity Generator (CESQG)
• Hazardous Waste Summary: ignitable hazardous wastes
• Violations: Generators (General); Date violation determined: 10-19-1995; Date achieved compliance: 11-06-1995 EDR Hist Auto Stat:
• Payne Services/ North Hills Exxon Services (1970 – 2014) North Hills Laundry & Dry Cleaning 4201D Six Forks Road ~425 feet E
Cross-gradient DRYCLEANERS • No specific details were provided except this listing was related to a 1965 city directory listing.
This location was a parking lot during Targus’ area reconnaissance. The facility was not identified in the other regulatory databases for releases or violations. Based on available aerial photographs, there was a commercial building present in 1965. Aerial photographs dated prior (1959) and after (1971) depicted this the location to be vacant/ undeveloped or a parking lot. The building appeared to have been present approximately 10 years or less. Based on separation distance, cross-gradient location, and lack of documented releases or violations, this facility was not considered a suspect recognized environmental condition.
N
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 19

Facility Information Apparent Hydrologic Relationship Database Information Additional Information SREC? (Y/N)
First Union Bank 4300 Six Forks Road ~515 feet NE
Cross-gradient LUST/ RGA LUST/ LUST TRUST/ IMD:
• Date occurred: 01-31-1994
• Incident Description: Release found during removal of 550-gal diesel generator tank
• Contamination Type: Soil • Corrective Action Plan Type: excavation • Received closure in 01-1996
Based on distance, cessation of activities, gradient, type of impact (soil), and regulatory closure, this facility is not considered a suspect recognized environmental condition.
N
Brothers Cleaners 4441 Six Forks Road ~800 feet NNE
Up-gradient EDR Hist Cleaners:
• Brothers Cleaners (2006 and 2010 – 2012) North Hills Cleaners & LNDR (2008 – 2009)
Active business - drop off station only. N
North Hills Cleaners 4421 Six Forks Road” ~745 feet NE
Up-gradient RCRA NonGen/ NLR, FINDS:
• Classification: Non-Generator
• Hazardous Waste Summary: ignitable hazardous waste
• Violations: Generators (general); Date violation determined: 11-23-1994; Date achieved compliance: 12-08-1994 EDR Hist Cleaner: North Hills Cleaners (1997 – 2003)
See discussion below Y
Brothers Cleaners 4221 Six Forks Road ~900 feet NNE
Up-gradient RCRA NonGen:
• Classification: Non-Generator
• Historical Generators: LQG (2009 – 2010) and SQG (2005 – 2006) • Hazardous Waste Summary: spent halogenated solvents
• Violations: No Violations Found DRYCLEANERS: • Facility ID: 092-0017
• Certified in the DSCA Program Status: Assessment with Low Priority
See discussion below Y
SREC-Suspect recognized environmental condition - if yes, see following discussion
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 20

Based on information provided in the preceding table, Targus considers the following facilities to constitute a suspect recognized environmental condition to the subject property. Additional
information concerning these suspect recognized environmental conditions is presented as follows. As indicated in the table, the remaining facilities were not considered to be suspect recognized environmental conditions and are not further discussed. North Hills Mall (4217 Six Forks Road) The shopping mall of which the subject property is a part was identified on the RCRA and FINDS databases with no reported violations. North Hills Mall Ownership Organization, LLC (NHMOO, LLC - owner entity) and Dillard’s Department Stores were identified in 2000 as Non-Generators. Review of regulatory information indicated that historically, Oklahoma Installation (store fixtures company) was a Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity generator in 1993 and not a generator in 2003. North Hills Mall was identified as a Large Quantity generator in 2004.
The subject property had no reported violations; however, it had extensive demolition and construction from 2000 to 2004 with removal and abatement of asbestos containing materials (ACM). Additionally, JCPenney was listed for asbestos removal in 2015. During these times,
no suspect tenants appear to have been in operation to have contributed to the RCRA listing, except for the removal of the ACMs. For the Brownfields’ listing, Targus contacted the DEQ’s Brownfields Program and spoke with Ms. Shirley Liggins, Program Administrative Assistant.
Ms. Liggins stated that they received a Letter of Intent to enter the Brownfields program back in June 2003. However, she reported that the project never progressed. There are no ongoing efforts or requirements from the agency. Information from prior reports indicated the application was submitted due to groundwater and soil contamination that originated from Exxon and former Brothers Cleaners. Based on the lack of documented releases/ violations, Targus does not consider the on-site regulatory listings for the subject property to present a
recognized environmental condition at this time. North Hills Exxon (4359 Six Forks Road) The North Hills Exxon utilized five USTs at the facility that included one 12,000-gallon diesel fuel UST, two 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs, one 8,000-gallon gasoline UST, and one 1,000-gallon used oil UST. The facility has a known release with assessments that were supervised by the DENR (predecessor to DEQ) and monitored by Kane as representative for the owner NHMOO, LLC.
Numerous prior assessments and subsurface investigations have been conducted for the Exxon facility. Review of prior reports and regulatory file information identified that in 1998,
approximately two feet of gasoline free product was detected in the groundwater at and south of the Exxon. Additionally, the petroleum plume was reported to extend across the area including the subject property. Between 1998 and 2001, approximately five aggressive fluid
vapor recovery (AFVR) events were conducted at this facility which removed free product and water. In 2002, a remediation system involving a combination of soil vapor extraction (SVE) and air sparging (AS) was installed at this facility. Annual groundwater monitoring has been conducted for the facility and on the subject property since 2006. In 2011, a new release was identified by the appearance of free product in two of the groundwater monitoring wells. The release was identified to have been from a pump island of which was replaced, and the release apparently halted. The SVE and AS systems were again implemented to aid in the capture of free product. The 2012 groundwater report did not identify free product within the wells sampled but did depict the petroleum plume to continue to extend under the North Hills Mall portions of the subject property. Kane provided a copy of the Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report by Mid-Atlantic that was reviewed by the DENR prior to
issuing a No Further Action (NFA) letter. The 2014 report stated that free product had not
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 21

been detected in monitoring wells for at least four consecutive quarters. However, review of the latest available annual groundwater sampling results (dated March to October 2014),
indicated that the groundwater contamination was still present at this facility and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) was depicted on plume maps to extend under the subject property. Nevertheless, in May 2015, the DENR issued a NFA letter for the release acknowledging that even though groundwater contamination exceeded the groundwater quality standards and was not suitable for use as water supply, concentrations met cleanup requirements for a low-risk site. The responsible party has been identified for the off-site release and an NFA has been issued. Review of available resources has not identified occupants or operations on the subject property that would appear likely to have contributed to the groundwater impact. Targus considers the former Exxon, and the associated petroleum compounds in groundwater to
present a historical recognized environmental condition. Firestone Store (100 North Hills South)
The former Firestone automotive repair facility was located approximately 280 feet to the northeast of the subject property. This area is presently a parking lot. This facility operated between the early 1960s and 2004 and utilized 14 hydraulic lifts, a 200-gallon gasoline UST,
and a 550-gallon used oil UST. The USTs and hydraulic lifts were removed, the building razed, and release incidents closed by the DENR via NFA letters. Subsurface impact to soil and groundwater from the Firestone activities was reported to have been localized to the Firestone property. Additionally, extensive groundwater sampling efforts in relation to the aforementioned Exxon and Brothers Cleaners (discussed below) included wells in the immediate vicinity of the former Firestone. No material impact to groundwater that did not appear attributable to the Exxon or Brothers facilities was reported in available documents. Targus previously interviewed Ms. Karen Harmon with DENR whom indicated that the original release was discovered in 1983 but was not reported until 2003, after the building and UST system had been removed. Both JCPenney (original owner of the building) and Bridgestone/ Firestone were determined to be Responsible Parties, but Bridgestone/Firestone performed the required assessment and reporting. Soil and groundwater were impacted but it was reported to have been localized; DENR determined the incident was low risk as the
groundwater contamination was not considered to be a threat to potential receptors. Ms. Harmon stated that “…if it (groundwater contamination from Firestone) had appeared to have been co-mingled to the west with the much larger contaminant plumes from the Exxon release
then the incident would not have been allowed NFA”. Based on distance, the cessation of operations, regulatory closure, interviews, and groundwater sampling efforts in the immediate vicinity; Targus does not consider the former Firestone a recognized environmental condition. North Hills Cleaners (4421 Six Forks Road) The former North Hills Cleaners operated during the mid-1990s. The former dry cleaner was identified as a Non-Generator with one reported violation in 1994 (written violation for lack of a safety/ waste management program) which received compliance in 1994. No other pertinent information was identified within the regulatory report. Targus interviewed Mr. Jennings Glen of Kane Realty Corporation during our 2013 Phase I ESA. Mr. Glenn represented the previous owner of the subject property at the time of Targus’ 2013 ESA. According to Mr. Glenn, the former dry cleaner was located in a prior building attached to the northeast corner of 4421 Six Forks Road. This area has been redeveloped
for commercial/ retail use. During Targus 2013 ESA, we reviewed a prior that quoted Mr.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 22

Jeffrey Tyburske, P.G. of Mid-Atlantic. According to Mr. Tyburske, this area was excavated down 15 to 20 feet during redevelopment activities and no signs of contamination were found.
According to Mr. Glenn, no reports were generated for the prior dry cleaner, but Mid-Atlantic conducted the excavation and found no evidence of contamination to warrant further investigation. According to the DENR, Brothers Cleaners (discussed below) is the identified responsible party for known chlorinated contamination in the area. No other file information was found for the former dry cleaner. Based on the on-going groundwater monitoring in the vicinity of the former dry cleaner, cessation of activities, reported removal of soil with no reported contamination found, and because a responsible party has been identified, Targus does not consider the former North Hills Cleaners to represent a recognized environmental condition to the subject property at this time.
Brothers Cleaners (4221 Six Forks Road) The former Brothers Cleaners, a PCE dry-cleaning facility, operated from 1967 to early 2000s
in stand-alone building located near the southwest corner of Rowan Street and Six Forks Road. Brothers Cleaners operated as a drop-station in the prior building until it was demolished in 2002 and redeveloped into a parking area. The present Brothers Cleaners
location (4441 Six Forks Road) is also a drop-station only. The prior Brothers facility was assigned DSCA Site #92-0017 by DENR Division of Waste Management (DWM) DSCA. Following building demolition, soil excavation was conducted in 2002 in former building and dumpster locations to remove PCE-impacted soil. Groundwater PCE impacts exceeding state comparison criteria were present. The highest PCE concentrations were extended south across the area including the subject property with the plume extending more than 2,000 feet south from former cleaner building. In 2011, PCE attributed to the Brothers release was detected in surface water across Interstate Highway 440 to the south of the subject property. Targus review the latest available limited groundwater monitoring event from September 2016. According to the consultant (Hart & Hickman) performing the assessment and monitoring of the release for the DENR, the primary constituent of concern at the site is PCE, which was detected in numerous wells at concentrations above the DSCA Tier 1 Risk-Based
Screening Level (RBSL). Trichloroethylene (TCE) has also been detected in a down-gradient wells at concentrations slightly above the Tier 1 RBSL; cis-1,2-DCE has been detected in a few down-gradient wells at concentrations below the Tier 1 RBSL. Hart & Hickman concluded
that the facility was not a potential candidate for closure because the plume has not been delineated. They stated that soil gas concentrations on non-source properties may also be an obstacle. Hart & Hickman recommended additional groundwater monitoring. Subsurface soil gas investigations have been conducted across the area including the subject property during different phases between 2010 and 2019. Seven of the vapor sampling points (indoor air and soil gas) were located on the subject property. Based on the analytical data, the target chemicals of concern (PCE, TCE and vinyl chloride) were not detected above their respective screening levels. Targus noted that in April 2017, two subsurface soil gas monitoring points (SVMP-19 and -20) were installed along the southern portion of the subject property, down-gradient of the mall development, including the on-site buildings. Vapor
samples were analyzed for chlorinated VOCs. Low concentrations of PCE and vinyl chloride were detected. Hart & Hickman utilized the DSCA Programs risk calculator to evaluate potential vapor intrusion risks. Under both residential and non-residential use scenarios, no
unacceptable exposure risks were identified.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 23

Brothers Cleaners has been identified as the source of the PCE release. Targus contacted Mr. Mike Cunningham, the project manager for the Brothers Cleaners’ case who is with the
DSCA. According to Mr. Cunningham, the case is considered fully assessed; however, they will not be issuing a NFA letter at this time. One of the soil gas point, SVMP-8 (approximately 2,000 feet northeast), failed the residential use criteria. As a result, there will be on-going groundwater monitoring. With respect to the subject property, Mr. Cunningham acknowledge that there is still PCE exceedances on-site. However, because of the relatively low levels, he indicated that it does not appear that vapor intrusion would be a concern for commercial use based on the groundwater and soil gas concentrations. Because the case is not closed out, the agency has not imposed land use restrictions in area, except that North Carolina prohibits installation of water supply wells in areas of known groundwater contamination. The responsible party has been identified for the off-site release and active monitoring of the
release incident is on-going under the supervision of DEQ. Review of available resources has not identified occupants or operations on the subject property that would appear likely to have contributed to the groundwater impact. Targus considers the former Brothers Cleaners, and
the associated hazardous substances in groundwater beneath the subject property present a
recognized environmental condition.
The remaining facilities identified within their respective approximate minimum search distance included one or more LUST and INST CONTROL facilities. These facilities were located at least 500 feet from the subject property in topographically down- to cross-gradient positions. Based on distance and other facility-specific characteristics, these facilities are not considered to constitute suspect recognized environmental conditions to the subject property. Several other facilities were identified on the database report. Area research did not indicate that these facilities were located within their respective approximate minimum search distances. The database report listed two “orphan” facilities (facilities that were not mapped in the
database report due to poor or inadequate address information). The orphan facilities did not appear to be present within the respective minimum search distances for the databases listed with the exception of North Hills Shopping Center that is discussed above. Based upon Targus’ area reconnaissance, apparent distances of separation, type of regulatory listings identified for the listed facilities, and/or conditions typical of the identified facility activities, the remaining orphan facility (Chestnut Hills Gulf Service) do not constitute a suspect recognized
environmental condition to the subject property. The regulatory database vendor provides proprietary databases that may identify historical cleaners, auto stations, and manufactured gas plants that are identified, typically based on city directory reviews and/or Sanborn Maps. Facilities included on this database typically operated before modern regulations requiring notification/ registration. These facilities may not be listed on regulatory databases but may be suspect recognized environmental
conditions due to proximity to the subject property. Targus reviewed the proprietary databases, and two facilities, Payne’s Service (4359 Six Forks Road) and North Hills Cleaners (4421 and 4421 Six Forks Road), were identified to be suspect recognized environmental conditions, and discussed above. There are no additional historical cleaners, auto stations, or
manufactured gas plants.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 24

4.2 ADDITIONAL FEDERAL, STATE, TRIBAL, AND LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES
Targus conducted the following local inquiries to enhance and supplement the ASTM E 1527-13 standard environmental record sources when, in the judgment of the environmental professional, such additional records were deemed to be reasonably ascertainable; were sufficiently useful and accurate, and complete in light of the objective of the records review; and were generally obtained pursuant to local good commercial or customary practice.
Additional Environmental Record Sources/ Local Inquiries
Database/ Source Entity Facility Response Received Y/N
Pertinent Information Available Y/N
Local Inquiry
Raleigh City Fire Department Subject Property Y No pertinent information found.
County Inquiry Wake County Public Records
Subject Property Y No pertinent information found.
Brothers Cleaners – 4221 Six Forks Road N Pending.
Exxon – 4359 Six Forks Road N Pending.
State Inquiry
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Subject Property Y No pertinent information found.
Brothers Cleaners – 4221 Six Forks Road Y A formal response was not received but Targus reviewed available documents on the agency’s online database. In addition, Targus interviewed the Project Manager at DSCA regarding the Brothers Cleaners. See discussion in Section 4.1.
Exxon – 4359 Six Forks Road Y
Based upon review of other regulatory information discussed above and in Section 4.1.1, findings indicating suspect recognized environmental conditions to the subject property not
otherwise addressed were not anticipated from the outstanding local inquiry(s) presented above. ASTM E 1527-13 requires regulatory agency files to be obtained and reviewed if the subject or any adjoining property is identified on one or more of the standard federal, state, or tribal environmental record sources as listed in Section 8.2.1 of the ASTM standard. File review as
required by ASTM E 1527-13 was conducted as discussed in Section 4.1.1. 4.3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE(S) Physical setting sources specified in Section 7.8 of this report were reviewed to provide information about the geology and hydrogeology of the subject property.
Surface Drainage Based upon the topographic map reviewed, the subject property sloped to the south toward an unnamed intermittent stream of Big Branch Creek depicted along the southeastern boundary of the subject property. Big Branch Creek, a branch of Crabtree Creek, is depicted approximately 1,200 feet to the southeast of the subject property and Crabtree Creek is
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 25

depicted approximately 3,500 feet to the south of the subject property (see the Topographic Map in the appendices). The subject property had an average surface elevation of
approximately ranging from 360 to 380 feet above the National Geodetic Vertical Datum presented on the topographic map reviewed. Observation of the subject property topography corresponded with information presented on the topographic map. Geologic Setting Review of the referenced sources indicated that the subject property is located in the Southern Piedmont Physiographic Region in an area underlain by the Milton and Raleigh Belts. The Milton Belt consists of gneiss, schist, and metamorphosed intrusive rocks, while the Raleigh Belt consists of granite, gneiss, and schist. The Piedmont is characterized by broad gently rolling inter-stream areas and steeper slopes along drainage ways.
Groundwater
Review of referenced sources indicated the shallowest aquifer in the area is within the Piedmont and Blue Ridge aquifer formation. The Piedmont and Blue Ridge aquifer is a crystalline rock aquifer, with estimated groundwater levels of less than 100 feet to greater than
1,000 feet below ground surface (bgs). The Piedmont and Blue Ridge aquifers consist of bedrock overlain by unconsolidated material called regolith. Included in the regolith is saprolite, which is a layer of earthy, decomposed rock developed by weathering of the bedrock; soil that develops on the upper part of the saprolite; and alluvium, which is mainly confined to stream valleys and may overlie soil, saprolite, and bedrock. Because the crystalline rocks formed under intense heat and pressure, they have few primary pore spaces, and the porosity and permeability of the unweathered and unfractured bedrock are extremely low. Groundwater can be obtained from two sources: the regolith, and fractures in the rock. Review of boring logs for well installation for the subject property and adjoining north Exxon facility indicated that generally subsurface soils consisted of reddish orange silty sand, followed by yellow, brown, and pink micaceous silty sand; reddish brown sandy silt with trace clay; tan and brown micaceous sandy silt; tan, brown, and red micaceous clay silt; tan, brown, and gray micaceous silt with trace clay; and reddish brown micaceous silty clay from below
concrete to 35 feet bgs. Shallow (“perched”) groundwater often is encountered in the region at or near the top of
bedrock but, as a result of inconsistent yield, typically is not used as a source of drinking water. Perched water levels will vary and will depend upon seasonal moisture fluctuations and local waterway levels. Based on several investigations by Mid-Atlantic for the Exxon and Brothers Cleaners as discussed in Section 4.1, shallow groundwater often is encountered at a range of 20 to 35 feet bgs. The measured groundwater flow direction across the majority of the subject property was identified to be to the south towards Crabtree Creek. According to the EDR Well Search information, no water wells were located within one-quarter mile of the subject property. However, reviewed regulatory reports for the Exxon facility and Brothers Cleaners identify several private residential water wells in the nearby neighborhoods. No depth to groundwater or construction dates/information was provided but
some of the nearby private wells were required by the DENR to be sampled for the potential to have been impacted. One of those wells warrants additional discussion. A private well at 4218 Camelot (Samuel Moore residence) would have been located within approximately
1,100 feet east/northeast and cross-gradient of the subject property. This well was sampled
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 26

in 2004 and again in early 2005 and found to have concentrations of the petroleum products naphthalene and 4-isopropyltoluene. According to Ms. Harmon of the DENR, the
concentrations were below comparison criteria on the second round and non-detect during a third round of sampling in mid-2005. The DENR did not require additional sampling of the well; they opined that the petroleum was not a result of the Exxon release but likely due to small releases from residential heating oil tanks that had been left in the ground in the neighborhood to the north. Given the distance from the subject property and sampling results, it is unlikely that contaminants identified in the Samuel Moore well would have impacted the subject property and it is not considered to present a suspect recognized environmental
condition. 4.4 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON THE PROPERTY
Historical sources specified in Section 7.8 of this report were reviewed to assess on-site historical activities. Targus’ findings are presented in the following table. A 2018 aerial photograph of the subject property is appended to this report, as are additional aerial
photographs reviewed.
Table of Historical Subject Property Usage
Current Use/Location Prior Use Source Comments
North Hills Mall Multiple Addresses: 4100, 4121, and 4151 Main at North Hills Street 4321 4361, and 4381 Lassiter at North Hills Street 4217 Six Forks Road
Wooded undeveloped land single-family residences Prior to 1917 to 1963 Strip Mall 1963 to 1968 North Hills Mall 1968 to 2000 Demolition and construction 2000 to 2004 North Hills Mall District 2004 to present
A, COT, CD, GFR, I, PR, T The subject property was identified during the regulatory review as North Hills Mall at 4217 Six Forks Road. See discussion in Section 4.1.
A - Aerial Photographs COT – Chain-of-Title CD - City Directory abstract6 I – Interviews PR – Prior Report T - Topographic Map GFR – Government File Reviews No evidence or regulatory listings of fuel oil USTs at the former single-family residences was identified or reported to be present on the subject property. If single-family residences or prior on-site structures had been equipped with fuel oil USTs, the tanks would have likely been removed with the extensive redevelopment (including excavations) of the subject property areas. Targus does not consider the potential for former on-site fuel oil USTs a suspect
recognized environmental condition.
In addition to the historical information presented in the table above, an assessment as to whether or not historical uses are considered to present a suspect recognized environmental condition to the subject property was based on whether or not addresses for the subject
property were listed on the regulatory databases reviewed (Section 5.1), interviews with local

6 Targus reviewed an abstract of city directories in an attempt to identify prior occupants of the subject property or adjoining parcels. The abstract was obtained from a third-party service provider Environmental Data Resources (EDR) who is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of its work product.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 27

agency personnel (Section 5.2), information obtained from prior reports (Section 5.6), Targus' subject property reconnaissance observations (Section 6.0), or interviews with the Key Site
Manager and/or owner’s representative (Sections 6.0 and 7.0). Based on information obtained by Targus and as presented in the above-referenced sections, other than as discussed above, historical uses of the subject property do not present suspect recognized environmental
conditions to the subject property. 4.5 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON ADJOINING PROPERTIES
Nearby property usage could potentially impact the surface and subsurface conditions at a subject property. Developing a history of past uses or occupancies can provide an indication of the potential for recognized environmental conditions associated with the subject property.
Historical information specified in Section 7.8 of this report was reviewed to assess off-site activities. Targus’ findings are presented in the following table.
Table of Historical Surrounding Land Usage
Current Use/Location Prior Use Source Comments
North: Lassiter Mill Road followed by: Alexan Apartments with ground floor commercial tenants 4209 Lassiter Mill Road
Wooded undeveloped land Prior to 1949 to 1963 Cleared land 1963 to 1965 US Postal Service / parking lot 1965 to 2004 Alexan Apartments with ground floor commercial tenants 2004 to present
A, CD, PR, T
Observed ground floor tenants included: Quail Ridge Books, Good Chandler, Relax the Back, The Spectacle, Von Kekel, Vivace, Quintessentials, J.M. Laughlin, Lamb’s Ear, Paperbuzz, Fleur, and Uniquities. No suspect
recognized environmental conditions were identified.
Northeast: Multi-tenant commercial space 4350 and 4380 Lassiter at North Hills Avenue Note: This was part of North Hills Mall that includes the subject property.
Wooded undeveloped land single-family residences Prior to 1917 to 1963 Construction 1963 to 1968 Paved Parking Lot 1968 to 2000 Demolition and construction 2000 to 2004 Part of the North Hills Mall 2004 to present
A, CD, PR, T Observed ground floor tenants included: Ethan Allen, Moe’s Southwest Grill, Beyondblue, Liles Clothing Studio, Charlotte’s Jewelry & Gifts, Lily Rain, Blue Mercury, Vineyard Vines, and Firebirds Wood Fired Grill.
East/ Southeast: Multi-tenant commercial space and part of Renaissance Hotel 4100 – 4160 Main at North Hills Street Note: This was part of North Hills Mall that includes the subject property.
Wooded undeveloped land single-family residences Prior to 1917 to 1963 Strip Mall 1963 to 1968 North Hills Mall 1968 to 2000 Demolition and construction 2000 to 2004 Part of the North Hills Mall 2004 to present
A, CD, PR, T Observed ground floor tenants included: Monkee’s, Starbucks, Ben and Jerry’s, Brighton, Scout and Molly’s, Copper Penny, Smoothie King, Fitness Connection, Lou Lou, and Marta’s. Renaissance Hotel was constructed in the late 2000s.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 28

South: Interstate 440 (or Raleigh Beltline) followed by: Single-family residences Various addresses
Wooded undeveloped land and a rural residence Prior to 1959 to 1960s Residential 1960s to present
A, CD, PR, T
No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
Southwest: Interstate 440 and Lassiter Mill Road intersection followed by: Single-family residences Various addresses
Unknown commercial use Prior to 1959 to late 2000s Residential Late 2000s to present
A, CD, PR, T
The unknown commercial use was present until the late 2000s. No information on the historical use of this facility was available during this assessment. However, given its period of operation (including post-1980), if significant quantities of petroleum products and/ or hazardous substances were utilized, the facility would have been subjected to registration requirement. This facility was not identified on the regulatory databases. Based on separation distance, down-gradient location and lack of documented releases or violations, Targus does not consider the unknown commercial facility to present a suspect recognized environmental condition. West: Lassiter Mill Road followed by: Single-family residences Various addresses
Wooded undeveloped land and a rural residence Prior to 1959 to 1960s Residential 1960s to present
A, CD, PR, T
No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
A - Aerial Photographs CD - City Directories PR - Previous Report T - Topographic Map An assessment as to whether or not historical adjoining land use was considered to present
a suspect recognized environmental condition to the subject property was based on whether or not the property or occupants were listed on the regulatory databases reviewed (Section 4.1), information obtained from prior reports (Section 5.3), interviews with local agency
personnel (Section 4.2), Targus' area reconnaissance observations (Section 2.1.3), and interviews with the site contact and/or owner’s representative (Sections 5.0 and 6.0). Based on information obtained by Targus and as presented in the above-referenced sections, other
than discussed above, prior historical surrounding land usage was not considered a suspect
recognized environmental condition to the subject property. 4.6 JURISDICTION Agencies that may have jurisdiction over on-site operations are listed in Section 8.10. 4.7 DOCUMENT REQUEST Targus requested additional documents such as environmental reports, construction details, and budget information from Kane Realty (owner representative). Documents received are
provided in Appendix G. Details of pertinent reports are included in Section 5.3. 4.8 KNOWLEDGE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEEDINGS
The Key Site Manager, Mr. David Parker of Kane, responded to Targus questions on the subject property via e-mail on October 15, 2019. Mr. Parker had been associated with the
subject property since early 2002 when his company redeveloped of the land. No information regarding environmental liens or AULs was reported to Targus during this interview. In addition, the Key Site Manager was not aware of (1) any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 29

property; (2) any pending, threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or from the subject property; or (3) any
notices from governmental entities regarding possible violations of environmental laws or possible liabilities relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products. 4.9 REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE SETTING Information pertaining to the environmental site setting is presented in Section 4.3. 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 5.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
Targus visually and physically observed accessible areas of the subject property. The periphery of the subject property was visually and/or physically observed, as well as the
periphery of structures on the subject property. The subject property was viewed from adjacent public thoroughfares. In the interiors of structures, Targus observed accessible common areas expected to be used by occupants or the public, as well as maintenance and
storage areas. Targus also observed a representative sample of tenant spaces. Limitations imposed by physical obstructions or other limiting conditions included:
• Access to the JCPenney’s hydraulic and freight elevator pits was not provided.
• Access to the Renaissance Hotel was limited to commonly accessible areas. Targus’ did not have access to the mechanical and storage areas at the hotel.
5.1.1 Areas Reviewed During the Site Visit The site reconnaissance was conducted on October 10 and 11, 2019. Areas viewed included the interiors of the accessible buildings, exterior areas located on the subject property, the parking garage/lots, and the exterior of the surrounding buildings located adjacent to the subject property. 5.2 OBSERVATIONS 5.2.1 General Subject Property Reconnaissance The Client requested that Targus contact Mr. Parker to obtain information and access to the subject property. Targus was escorted during the site reconnaissance by Mr. Parker. Mr. Parker stated that he had been familiar with the subject property since approximately 2002
and that he had good knowledge of the current uses and physical characteristics of the subject property and was therefore considered the Key Site Manager.
The subject property reconnaissance was performed by Mr. Christopher Davis, a professional experienced in environmental site assessments, in an attempt to identify apparent visual indications of present or past activities that have or could have contaminated the subject
property. The observed use of the subject property was discussed in Section 2.1.1. A description of structures, roads, and other improvements on the subject property, if any, was presented in Section 2.1.2.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 30

General Subject Property Observations
Description
Reported or Observed
On-site (Y/N)
Comments (Observations considered to be SRECs are further discussed
after the table.)
Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products in Connection with Identified Uses
Y Small quantities of paints, maintenance, and cleaning supplies were noted in the maintenance office and storage room and in flammable cabinets. Additionally, there were approximate three-gallon containers (less than 10) of gasoline and diesel. The fuel containers were used for lawn care equipment and golf carts. The chemicals were in closed containers without apparent leakage or spills.
Storage Tanks Y One 150-gallon and one 250-gallon polyethylene tank were observed on the P2 level of the parking garage in the vicinity of the maintenance shop. The polyethylene containers were filled with water and used to run the power washer.
Strong, Pungent, or Noxious Odors N
Pools of Liquid N
Drums Y Targus observed one 55-gallon drum within the sump room in the parking garage. The drum was empty and used to collect water from sump pumps located within the elevator pits, if necessary. Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products Containers Not in Connection with Identified Uses
N
Unidentified Substance Containers N
Potential Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)-Containing Equipment
Y Pad-mounted electrical transformers were observed on the subject property. The transformers were labeled as “non-PCB Units.” The transformers were in observed to be in undamaged physical condition and displayed no visible evidence of leakage. According to the KSM, the transformers were owned by Duke, the reported apparent electrical power delivery utility. Hydraulic Equipment Y Hydraulic Trash Compactors Targus observed several hydraulic trash compactors in the service and loading areas throughout the subject property. No leaks, spills, or releases for the system were reported or observed during the site visit. Based on observations, the hydraulic trash compactors are not considered a suspect recognized
environmental condition to the subject property. Hydraulic Elevator Six hydraulic elevators that provided access to the various floors of the buildings for the North Hills Mall were observed on the subject property. The presence of hydraulic elevators presents a suspect recognized environmental condition and is discussed below. It should be noted that elevators at the Renaissance Hotel were traction-driven.
Contracted Maintenance Services
Y Lawn care and pest control activities were reported by the site representative to be generally conducted by contracted maintenance services. No chemicals typically associated with lawn care or pest control activities were observed by Targus during the site reconnaissance or reported to be present on site by the Key Site Manager except for the fuel containers mentioned above.
Utilities and Storm Water Management
Y Natural gas was supplied to the subject property by PSNC Energy. Electricity was supplied to the subject property by Duke
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 31

General Subject Property Observations
Description
Reported or Observed
On-site (Y/N)
Comments (Observations considered to be SRECs are further discussed
after the table.)
Energy. The City of Raleigh provided water and wastewater services to the subject property. Surface water runoff from the subject property was expected to drain into various storm drain inlets located throughout the parking lots, parking garage, and into adjoining street-side gutters. No stains or evidence of improper disposal of petroleum or hazardous substances were noted in relation to the observed stormwater areas on the day of the assessment. Other N Food Grease Traps Several in-ground grease traps were reported and observed throughout and adjacent to the subject property, as depicted on the site plan in Appendix A. Mr. Parker reported that the grease traps serviced the various on-site restaurants. The grease traps were serviced monthly or as-needed by a licensed service group. Mr. Parker reported that the grease traps function properly and are well maintained. The in-ground grease traps are not considered suspect recognized environmental conditions to the subject property. Additionally, three (150-gallon containers) used cooking grease containers were in the service and loading areas on the subject property. The used cooking grease was collected from restaurant tenant spaces at the subject property. No significant staining was observed in the area of the used cooking oil containers, with exception of the rear of Mura. Targus observed surface staining from spills around the used cooking grease containers. The surface staining was limited and restricted to the concrete around the containers. While better housekeeping practices should be employed, due to the containment to paved areas and type of staining (cooking oil vs. petroleum or other hazardous substances), Targus does not consider the used cooking grease containers suspect recognized environmental conditions to the subject property. There were two air compressors on-site. Evidence of equipment oil leaks was not observed in the vicinity of the compressor.
Hydraulic Elevators
Six hydraulic elevators were observed on the subject property as follows:

• Elevator #1 (Parking Garage) is a passenger elevator that provided access from parking lot P1 to second floor. This elevator was installed in 2004.
• Elevator #2 (Parking Garage) is a passenger elevator that provided access from parking lot P1 to second floor. This elevator was installed in 2004.
• Elevator #3 (Parking Garage) is a passenger elevator that provided access from parking lot P1 to third floor. This elevator was installed in 2004.
• Elevator #4 (Parking Garage) is a passenger elevator that provided access from parking lot P1 to third floor. This elevator was installed in 2004.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 32

• Elevator #5 (JCPenney) is a passenger elevator that provided access from the 1st floor
to second floor. This elevator was installed in 1968.
• Elevator #6 (JCPenney) is a freight elevator that provided access from the 1st floor to the
third floor. This elevator was installed in 1968. Mr. Parker stated that to his knowledge, the elevators function properly and had not been
repaired for fluid loss or removed from service. According to Mr. Parker, the elevators were maintained by Schindler Elevator Corporation under a service agreement. Mr. Parker provided Targus with access to the reservoir/pump rooms. Targus observed that the
reservoir/pump equipment for the hydraulic elevators appeared to be in good condition. With regards to the elevator pits, Mr. Parker only had access to the JCPenney’s passenger elevator pit. The remaining elevator pits were inaccessible during Targus’ site reconnaissance. The JCPenney’s elevator pit did not exhibit indication of equipment failure (leaks, etc.). Targus left messages with Schindler Elevator Corporation for additional information for the on-site elevators. As of the issuance of this report, a response by Schindler has not been received. Based on the information provided concerning the elevator construction, that the property management was unaware of significant releases of hydraulic fluid, the age of the majority elevators (2004 ), limited observations, and interview, the elevators on the subject property are not considered recognized environmental conditions.
Exterior Observations
Description
Reported or Observed On-site (Y/N)
Comments (Observations considered to be SRECs are further discussed after the table.)
Pits, Ponds, Lagoons, and Surface Waters N
Stained Soil or Pavement Y Typical parking lot staining, associated with automobile crankcase leakage, was observed. Stressed Vegetation N
Solid Waste Y Solid waste dumpsters and hydraulic trash compactors were observed in the service/ loading areas of the subject property buildings. The hydraulic trash compactors are discussed above. According to the site representative, an off-site contractor serviced the dumpsters on a regular basis. Process/ Industrial Wastewater Discharges N No process or industrial wastewater discharges were identified.
Wells Y Monitoring wells were observed on-site. Based on available information, the wells were associated with releases form Exxon and former Brothers Cleaners. These facilities are further discussed in Section 4.1. Septic Systems N No evidence of septic systems was identified or reported to be present on the subject property.

Interior Observations
Description
Reported or
Observed On-site (Y/N)
Comments
(Observations considered to be SRECs are further discussed after the table.)
Heating/ Cooling Y Natural gas heating and electric cooling units. According to property management, no fuel oil and/or oil burners remain or are utilized on the subject property.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 33

Interior Observations
Description
Reported or Observed On-site (Y/N)
Comments (Observations considered to be SRECs are further discussed after the table.)
Stains or Corrosion Y Targus observed limited oil staining within the maintenance storage room in the ground floor of the parking garage. The oil staining appeared to be from limited equipment and vehicle maintenance of carts. The staining was limited to the paved concrete surface and no nearby floor drains were observed. Based on observations, Targus does not consider the limited surface oil staining a suspect
recognized environmental condition. Drains and Sumps Y Drains were not observed or reported to be present on the subject property, other than drains in the janitorial closets, kitchens, restrooms and storm drains in the parking areas/ driveways. Additionally, the sumps for the elevator pits were directed to the aforementioned 55-gallon drum. Targus did not observe stains; strong, pungent, or noxious odors; or evidence of improper disposal of material associated with these drains.

5.3 PRIOR ASSESSMENT USAGE Targus reviewed several prior reports that were provided by the Client. It should be noted
that numerous prior reports and assessments were reviewed during Targus’ 2013 Phase I ESA. Only pertinent information and excerpts are discussed and included in this report as deemed applicable.
Consultant, Report Title, Date Pertinent Information Conclusions
Targus Associates LLC (Targus) Report of Phase I ESA North Hills Retail, 4217 Six Forks Road, Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina 26709 October 15, 2013
Targus previously prepared a Phase I ESA on a larger tract that included the subject property. The assessed property included adjoining/ surrounding properties retail/ commercial properties to the north, northeast, and east/ southeast. Construction of the on-site improvements was completed in the 1960s and early 2000s with extensive renovations completed from 2004-2009. At the time of Targus site and area reconnaissance, the subject property and adjoining facilities consisted of retail/ commercial tenants, single-family residences and a multifamily development. Other nearby properties included an active Exxon Station (discussed in Section 4.1). During subject property reconnaissance Targus observed limited oil staining within the maintenance storage room in the parking garage at the North Hills Mall. The staining was restricted to the concrete and Targus considered it to be a de minimis condition and not a recognized environmental condition. Targus also observed one 55-gallon drum of high alkaline solvent based degreaser in the maintenance storage room. The drum was located on a spill preventive secondary pallet with limited staining around the pallet. Targus observed several pieces of hydraulic equipment: trash compactors, a cardboard baler, a dumbwaiter, and several elevators. Targus discussion on features identified during our 2019 site reconnaissance is presented in Section 5.2. During regulatory and prior reports review, Targus identified a 2,000-plus foot contamination plume related to release events from the Exxon service station and a former Brothers Cleaners (4221 Six Forks Road) located beyond adjoining to the property. This plume consisted of petroleum and/or chlorinated solvents in groundwater having migrated underneath the subject properties. Targus considered these facilities and the associated petroleum and hazardous substances in groundwater beneath the subject property
Targus concluded that the Exxon, former Brothers Cleaners and their associated petroleum and/ or chlorinated solvent-impacted groundwater that migrated under the subject property were recognized environmental conditions. Given the off-site nature of the release incidents and in consideration that the responsible parties were cooperating with the DENR to assess and remediate the impact, Targus did not recommend additional action related to the Exxon or former Brothers Cleaners.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 34

Consultant, Report Title, Date Pertinent Information Conclusions
to present a recognized environmental condition. Targus’ discussion on these facilities is presented in Section 4.1. A former Firestone automotive repair facility was located approximately 280 feet northeast of the subject property. The facility operated between the early 1960s and 2004 and utilized several hydraulic lifts and two USTs (200-gallon gasoline and 550-gallon used oil). The USTs and hydraulic lifts were removed, the building razed, and release incidents closed by the DENR via NFA letters. Based on the cessation of operation, regulatory closure, interviews, and groundwater sampling efforts in the immediate vicinity; Targus considers the former Firestone a historical recognized environmental condition and not a recognized environmental condition. The JCPenney’s store and associated parking structure in the North Hills Mall District were constructed in the 1960s and renovated from 2004 to 2009. Due to this and the absence of data to the contrary, Targus could not rule out ACM remaining at the subject property. Based on the good condition of the suspect ACM identified, asbestos was not considered to be a business environmental risk to the subject property.
5.4 USES AND CONDITIONS
5.4.1 Environmental Compliance Based on Targus’ observations, current activities at the subject property appear to be in general compliance with current environmental regulations. Targus understands that future demolition is planned for a portion of the subject property. Those activities, particularly related to asbestos and/or lead-based paint (if present), should be performed in accordance with applicable regulations. 5.4.2 Evidence of Leaks or Spills Targus observed evidence of leaks or spills in the vicinity of the maintenance shop as further discussed in Section 5.2.1. 5.4.3 Storage of Hazardous Substances
With the exception of limited paints, gasoline containers and general maintenance chemicals, no other chemical storage was observed on the day of the subject property reconnaissance,
as discussed in Section 5.2.1. 5.4.4 Mitigation Systems No environmental mitigation systems (e.g., vapor barrier, sub-slab depressurization system, radon mitigation system) were reported or observed to be in place at the subject property. 6.0 INTERVIEWS ASTM E 1527-13 requires that a reasonable attempt be made to interview past and present owners, operators, and occupants who are likely to have material information about uses and
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 35

conditions that could constitute a suspect recognized environmental condition to the subject property. ASTM E 1527-13 requires that the owner or its representative be asked to identify a
person with good knowledge of the uses and physical characteristics of the subject property who is defined as the Key Site Manager. The interviews were conducted in person, by telephone, or in writing and are discussed in the following table.
Name/ Company Title/ Position Comments
NHMOO, LLC/ NHM Owner-1, LLC/ Black Sapphire D Raleigh 2014, LLC, North Hills Unit 6 Owner, LLP/ North Hills Owner, LP
Owner The owner of the subject property was not available. Targus interviewed a representative of the owner, the Key Site Manager, as mentioned below.
Past Owner/ Occupant The prior owner of the subject property was not available.
Mr. David Parker Kane Realty
Key Site Manager The Key Site Manager was not aware of (1) any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property; (2) any pending, threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on or from the subject property; or (3) any notices from governmental entities regarding possible violations of environmental laws or possible liabilities relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products. Occupant Due to the confidential nature of this project, Targus did not interview the occupants. Local Gov. Official Information obtained from interviews and contact with local governmental officials is discussed in Section 4.2 of this report. Individuals interviewed during Targus prior ESA
Targus interview various individuals during the 2013 Phase I ESA. An excerpted copy of Targus Phase I ESA from 2013 is included in the appendices. Pertinent information that was obtained at the time was also used in preparation of this report.
Records of communication for the interviews conducted are provided in the appendices. 7.0 EVALUATION
7.1 FINDINGS Based on the information obtained by Targus to date, the following summarizes Targus’ findings and opinion regarding the known or suspect recognized environmental conditions identified and the environmental professional’s rationale for concluding that a condition is a recognized environmental condition, a controlled recognized environmental condition, a
historical recognized environmental condition, a de minimis condition, or not a recognized environmental condition.

Description (Address) Location Section (s) Discussed
North Hills Mall Regulatory Listings (4217 Six Forks Road) Subject Property 4.1
Hydraulic Elevators Subject Property 5.2.1
Firestone Store (100 North Hills South) Approximately 280 feet northeast 4.1 North Hills Exxon (4359 Six Forks Road) Approximately 450 feet northeast 4.1 North Hills Cleaners (4421 Six Forks Road) Approximately 745 feet northeast 4.1
Brothers Cleaners (4221 Six Forks Road) Approximately 900 feet north/ northeast 4.1

North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 36

7.2 OPINION
Based on the information obtained by Targus to date, the following summarizes Targus’ opinion of the impact on the subject property of known or suspect recognized environmental conditions identified in Targus’ findings (Section 7.1) and the environmental professional’s rationale for concluding that a condition is currently a recognized environmental condition,
historical recognized environmental condition, controlled recognized environmental condition, de minimis condition, or not a recognized environmental condition.
Description (Address) Opinion
North Hills Mall Regulatory Listings (4217 Six Forks Road)
Based on the lack of documented releases/ violations, Targus does not consider the on-site regulatory listings for the subject property to present a recognized environmental condition at this time.
Hydraulic Elevators Based on the information provided concerning the elevator construction, that the property management was unaware of significant releases of hydraulic fluid, the age of the majority elevators (2004 to 2009), limited observations, and interview, the elevators on the subject property are not considered recognized environmental
conditions. Firestone Store (100 North Hills South) Based on distance, the cessation of operations, regulatory closure, interviews, and groundwater sampling efforts in the immediate vicinity; Targus does not consider the former Firestone a recognized environmental condition.
North Hills Exxon (4359 Six Forks Road) The responsible party has been identified for the off-site release and an NFA has been issued. Review of available resources has not identified occupants or operations on the subject property that would appear likely to have contributed to the groundwater impact. Targus considers the former Exxon, and the associated petroleum compounds in groundwater to present a historical recognized
environmental condition. North Hills Cleaners (4421 Six Forks Road) Based on the on-going groundwater monitoring in the vicinity of the former dry cleaner, cessation of activities, reported removal of soil with no reported contamination found, and because a responsible party has been identified, Targus does not consider the former North Hills Cleaners to represent a recognized environmental condition to the subject property at this time.
Brothers Cleaners (4221 Six Forks Road) The responsible party has been identified for the off-site release and active monitoring of the release incident is on-going under the supervision of DEQ. Review of available resources has not identified occupants or operations on the subject property that would appear likely to have contributed to the groundwater impact. Targus considers the former Brothers Cleaners, and the associated hazardous substances in groundwater beneath the subject property present a recognized environmental condition.
7.3 ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION
No additional investigations were conducted as part of this assessment except for non-ASTM services discussed in Section 8.0.
7.4 DATA GAPS AND DEVIATIONS Data gaps are defined as a lack of or inability to obtain information required by ASTM E 1527-05 despite good faith efforts. Data gaps identified are discussed below and were not considered to be significant data gaps that affected the ability of the environmental professional to identify recognized environmental conditions. Known deviations or deletions from the scope of work defined by ASTM E 1527-05 were not intentionally made.

North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 37

• Data failure (a type of data gap) was encountered during the historical review of the subject
property. The historical use and occupancy of the subject property could not be documented prior to 1917 or from the first developed use of the subject property. Historical data sources may have had gaps of greater than a five-year interval. Targus does not
consider the data failure discussed above to present a significant data gap.
• Certain regulatory agency files requested for the subject had not been received as of the issuance of this report. In light of the collective information received and as reviewed/ discussed in this report, Targus does not consider these files omitted from review to
constitute a significant data gap. The listed standard historical sources were not reviewed. It is Targus’ opinion that these sources would not provide additional meaningful and complete information, or the sources were not considered to be practically reviewable or reasonably ascertainable.
• Building department records; and
• Zoning/ land use records. 7.5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Targus has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the North Hills NHX Redevelopment property located at 4321 Lassiter at North Hills Avenue in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-13. Exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 7.4 of this report. Based upon the information obtained, as reflected in this report, this assessment has revealed
no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property except as follows:
• Chlorinated solvent-impacted groundwater that has migrated under the subject property as a result of operations by the former Brothers Cleaners. Targus understands that the subject property will be redeveloped for continued commercial use. Given the presence of contaminated groundwater beneath the subject property and in
the area, if groundwater is encountered during the redevelopment, it should be managed in accordance with local and federal regulations to prevent potential discharge of impacted materials. If existing monitoring wells on the subject property will be affected by the redevelopment activities, they will need to be plugged and abandoned in accordance with regulations. It should also be noted that the DEQ may require reinstallation of these wells at a later time.
In addition, although vapor sampling has been conducted in select locations on the subject property and interview with the DSCA representative suggested vapor intrusion is unlikely, Targus recommends the potential for vapor intrusion conditions (present or future) be considered as part of the redevelopment. Future construction considerations to mitigate vapor concerns may include installation of a passive vapor mitigation system, installation of vapor barriers, or similar alternatives.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 38

7.5.1 Non-ASTM Issues
In accordance with the proposed scope of work, Targus conducted additional environmental services as discussed in Section 8.0 of this report. Based on Targus’ understanding of the Client’s objectives, risk tolerance, and plans for the subject property, this assessment/review did not identify business environmental risk associated with the additional environmental services performed; however, this conclusion is specifically conditional on proper future management of confirmed or suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) in accordance with applicable regulations. 7.6 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Additional services are discussed in Section 8.0.
7.7 LIMITING CONDITIONS, DEVIATIONS, AND DELETIONS
Limiting conditions are discussed in Section 5.1. Deviations and deletions are discussed in Section 7.4.
7.8 REFERENCES
• Raleigh West, North Carolina, Quadrangle, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 minute series Topographic Map, photorevised 1993;
• Soil Survey of Wake County, North Carolina, United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, dated 1980;

• EDR-Radius Map with GeoCheck, North Hills NHX Redevelopment, 4217 Six Forks Road,
Inquiry Number 5817008.2s, dated October 4, 2019;
• Aerial photographs purchased from EDR, dated 1959, 1965, 1971, 1983, 1993, 2008, and 2012;
• Aerial photograph obtained from Google Earth, dated 2018;
• Haines and Polk City Directories, dated 1961, 1965, 1969, 1974, 1979, 1984, 1989, 1994, 1999, 2004, and 2008, reviewed at the Olivia Raney Local History Library;
• Historical Fire Insurance Maps were requested from EDR. According to EDR, no Historical Fire Insurance Maps were available for the subject property;
• Environmental Lien Searches and Chain-of-Title reports by Texas Environmental Research, dated October 9, 2019;
• USFWS NWI map, obtained online at http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html;
• EPA Map of Radon Zones, viewed online at http://www.epa.gov/radon/zonemap.html;
• Administrative Site Review plans dated 2019, unsigned and prepared by The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.;
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 39

• Phase I ESA, North Hills Retail, 4217 Six Forks Road, Raleigh, NC, prepared by Targus Associates, Inc. dated October 15, 2013;
• Interviews with Mr. David Parker of Kane Realty Corporation (Key Site Manager);
• Interviews with Mr., Mike Cunningham, Project Manager/ Hydrogeologist, Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Program, Division of Waste Management for the DEQ;

• Open records request submitted to City of Raleigh (including Fire Department);

• Open records request submitted to Wake County Public Records; and

• Open records request submitted to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. 7.9 SIGNATURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL
Britt A. Blaylock Environmental Professional
In accordance with ASTM E 1527-13, this report includes the qualifications of the environmental professional, and the qualifications of the personnel conducting the site
reconnaissance and interviews, if conducted by someone other than an environmental professional. These qualifications are documented in the appendices. A Statement of Qualifications for the company has not been included with this report but can be provided
upon request. 7.10 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of an environmental professional as defined in Section 312.10 of 40 CFR 312, and I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. 8.0 ADDITIONAL (NON-ASTM STANDARD) SERVICES
In accordance with the scope of work presented in the proposal, Targus has included certain non-ASTM scope considerations as presented in this section of the report.
8.1 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS A visual asbestos survey of the subject property was performed on October 10 and 11, 2019
by Mr. Christopher Davis. This survey consisted of a walk-through of limited building areas,
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 40

and observation of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM). On-site personnel provided access to the areas observed by Targus. No asbestos O&M program was provided or reported
to exist for the subject property. The visual asbestos survey scope of work was intended to identify the potential presence of major classes of accessible suspect ACM at the subject property and addresses very limited objectives relating to the characterization of asbestos within the project. Estimation and determination of exact quantities and locations of these materials at the subject property was beyond the scope of this survey. These data alone are not appropriate for planning specific response actions or for health hazard assessment, nor are they sufficient for renovation or demolition activities. In the event renovation or demolition activities are planned, a comprehensive asbestos survey would be required prior to initiation of such activities.
The subject property consisted of an outdoor retail mall. Improvements included six buildings, surface lots, and parking par and parking decks. The majority of the subject property buildings were constructed from 2004 to 2009. The JCPenney store and associated parking structure
were constructed in 1968. Multiple asbestos surveys/ abatements have taken place at the JCPenney. These reports were reviewed during Targus 2013 ESA. According to Targus review, it was noted that the identified ACM from prior assessments was removed during
renovation activities; however, during Targus’ site visit (2013 and 2019), suspect ACM materials were observed. As mentioned previously, Targus understands that portions of the subject property are planned for demolition/renovation. In consideration, Kane provided a copy of an
Asbestos Abatement Cost Estimate dated July 31, 2019 prepared by Matrix Health & Safety Consultants, LLC that included a budget for asbestos management during the planned activities. Suspect ACM observed in the on-site buildings on the day of the assessment included various wall and ceiling systems (including wallboard, joint compound and texture), flooring system (tiles/ carpet) and associated mastic, caulking, pipe insulation, and ceiling tiles. On the exterior of the improvements Targus observed suspect ACM including roofing materials and stucco
plaster. The suspect ACM was observed by Targus to be in good condition and non-friable except for the ceiling tiles which were in good condition. Regardless of past renovations and in the absence of data to the contrary, Targus cannot rule out ACM remaining at the subject property. Although testing was not conducted, in buildings of similar age and type of construction the
presence of large quantities of asbestos in major suspect materials is uncommon. Notwithstanding date of construction or likelihood of asbestos, the National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations consider certain building materials that have not been thoroughly tested to be suspect ACM regardless. Such materials number in excess of 30,000 products, but those commonly encountered in modern building systems include flooring materials, mastics, sealants, finish textures, ceiling tiles, non-fiberglass thermal and other insulation, roofing components, and fireproofing. NESHAP regulations require that all ACM be identified prior to potential disturbance of suspect ACM such as demolition or renovation activities. The limited asbestos survey performed as part of this project was not intended to meet the performance standard established under NESHAP regulations for demolition and renovation.
Based on the good condition of the suspect ACM identified and because a budget for ACM handling/abatement appears to have been established, asbestos is not considered to be a
business environmental risk to the subject property at this time. However, the asbestos survey
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 41

was not comprehensive and should not be relied upon in preparation of renovation or demolition projects. Prior to demolition/ renovation activities or other activities that could
potentially disturb suspect ACM, additional sampling and analysis of the materials using protocols specified in AHERA (40 CFR 763) should be performed. Alternatively, the material can be assumed to contain asbestos and treated accordingly. Future activities that involve the disturbance or removal of confirmed or suspect ACM are required to be conducted in accordance with NESHAP and other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 8.2 BIOLOGICAL AGENTS 8.2.1 Legionella Targus conducted a visual inspection of the facility water systems (hot and cold-water
supplies, cooling and air handling systems, and any chemical treatment systems) on October 10, 2019 to identify any obvious vulnerabilities that may allow for amplification of Legionella. Mechanical systems for the subject property were generally located on the rooftop level or
basement and included air handlers, a cooling tower, chiller, and water holding tanks. No evidence of stagnation in connection with the mechanical systems was observed during the site reconnaissance.
Information from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicates the ideal water temperature range for Legionella growth is 77 to 108 degrees Fahrenheit. Mr. Parker indicated that the hot water temperature at the subject property is maintained at approximately 110 degrees Fahrenheit on a recirculating system. The City of Raleigh supplied fresh water to the subject property. Information from the 2018
Drinking Water Quality report indicated no health-based violations associated with bacteria in the supplied water. Residual disinfectant in the supplied water is chlorine. Mr. Parker indicated there has not been pressure drop, boil water advisories or water disruption to the subject property.
8.3 CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES
The subject property was developed with mixed-use commercial retail facilities in the early 1960s when the property was converted to a shopping mall. A review of the North Carolina Office of Archives & History, the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office, North
Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, and the North Carolina Division of Historical Resources websites did not identify significant archaeological sites, historic structures, or other known cultural resources in the vicinity of the subject property. Based on this
information, the project will likely have no effect on significant cultural resources. 8.4 ENDANGERED SPECIES Based on information reviewed on the USFWS Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) website, endangered species for Wake County, and their listing status’ are identified as follows.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 42

Common Name Scientific Name Type
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Bird
Carolina Madtom Norturus furiosus Fish
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Clam
Michaux’s Sumac Rhus michauxii Flowering Plant
As part of this assessment, Targus’ endangered species review included the following:
• On-site observations for listed species and/or their critical habitat as documented on the USFWS website;
• The utilization of the USFWS IPaC application; and
• A comparison of critical habitat and territory information to conditions observed on the subject property.
Based on the list of endangered species identified within Wake County, local observations, habitat comparisons, development within the immediate site vicinity, and absence of critical habitat on the subject property (according to the IPaC application), the potential for endangered species to be present at the subject property on a non-transient basis is considered to be low. 8.5 INDOOR AIR QUALITY
As discussed in Section 4.1, releases associated with the former Brothers Cleaners and Exxon resulted in an area wide groundwater contamination by VOCs (chlorinated and
petroleum). According to Mr. Cunningham of the DSCA, it does not appear that vapor intrusion would be a concern for commercial use based on the relatively low levels of VOCs in groundwater and soil gas concentrations at the subject property. In 2017, Hart & Hickman
assessment included two soil gas monitoring points on the southern end of the subject property. Hart & Hickman utilized the DSCA Programs risk calculator to evaluate potential intrusion risks. Under both residential and non-residential use scenarios, no unacceptable exposure risks were identified.
Targus understands that the subject property will be redeveloped for continued commercial use with ventilated parking garages and retail spaces. Although vapor sampling has been conducted in select locations on the subject property and interview with the DSCA representative suggested vapor intrusion is unlikely, Targus recommends the potential for vapor intrusion conditions (present or future) be considered as part of the redevelopment.
8.6 LEAD BASED PAINT Based upon the recent construction and/or renovation dates of the on-site improvements (2004 through 2009), and in consideration that the subject property was commercially occupied with no on-site residents, a survey for lead-based paint was not conducted per the client scope of work.
8.7 LEAD-IN-DRINKING WATER Drinking water for the subject property was supplied by the City of Raleigh. Targus reviewed the consumer confidence water system report for water distributed by this system. Targus reviewed the consumer confidence water system report for water distributed by this system.
Data published in 2018 did not identify health-based violations associated with lead-in-drinking water supplied by this system.
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 43

8.8 MOLD / MICROBIAL GROWTH
A limited survey for visible fungal growth and physical deficiencies conducive to mold (i.e., “mold survey”) of the subject property was performed by Targus’ field observer on October 10 and 11, 2019. The objective of this mold survey was to observe and report on the apparent presence of, or potential for, moisture intrusion and visible fungal growth in readily accessible representative areas of the subject property to the extent feasible within the process described in Targus’ authorized scope. This mold survey was not intended to be comprehensive in all or most building systems and was not intended to eliminate the risk of moisture intrusion or fungal growth. No limited survey can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for moisture intrusion or fungal growth. Targus’ field observer made visual observations of the interiors of the subject property
improvements. Those observations included readily-accessible common areas (doorways, windows, vents), offices, restrooms, the maintenance shop, and the parking garage. In general, interior areas selected for observation included toilet room vanities, along window
frames and perimeter walls and wall penetrations, and near HVAC equipment. These named areas were included as locations where moisture infiltration and fungal growth commonly occur and can often be evident from visual observations. Additional interior areas may have
also been observed as judged by the field observer to merit inclusion. No indicators of interior excessive moisture, water-affected building materials, visible fungal growth, or other conditions were observed. Based on Targus’ observation and proposed redevelopment, potential mold/ moisture intrusion concerns are not considered a business environmental risk at this time. 8.9 RADON Radon (Rn222) is a naturally occurring inert, colorless, odorless radioactive gas derived from the decay of radium (Ra226). Radium occurs in geological formations containing uranium, granite, shale, phosphate, or pitchblende and was commercially used in luminescent products. Radium decays into reactive, radioactive daughter particles that attach themselves to other particles such as dust and are a lung cancer risk. Radon can move through permeable
rocks and soils and can eventually seep into buildings. The movement of radon into buildings is controlled largely by the soil permeability under a foundation and access to the interior of buildings through openings in the foundation.
According to the EPA Map of Radon Zones and the EDR-Radius Map with GeoCheck, Wake County was located in EPA Radon Zone 2 (average indoor levels greater than 2 and less than
4 picoCuries per liter [(pCi/L]). Based upon published information and non-residential site usage, radon does not appear to present a business environmental risk to the subject property. 8.10 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE The subject property did not appear to engage in environmentally related activities at the time of the assessment. However, planned future demolition and redevelopment activities are expected to include removal of remnant chemicals, possible abatement of asbestos and/or lead-based paint. These activities each have respective regulatory requirements which should be followed for the planned future activities.

North Hills - NHX Redevelopment October 2019 Targus Project No. T19-4079 Page 44

Likewise, contaminated groundwater is present beneath the subject property and in the area. If groundwater is encountered during redevelopment, it should be managed/discharged in
accordance with local and federal regulations. The aforementioned groundwater impact is being monitored and will be in the future. If existing monitoring wells on the subject property will be affected by the redevelopment activities, they will need to be plugged and abandoned in accordance with regulations. It should also be noted that the DEQ may require reinstallation of these wells at a later time. The following authorities may have authority regarding certain environmental matters that may be pertinent at, and in proximity to, the subject property: City of Raleigh Fire Department [phone] City of Raleigh Public Works [phone]
City of Raleigh Department of Public Health [phone] City of Raleigh Planning [phone] City of Raleigh Development Services Department [phone]
Wake County Environmental Health [phone] North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality [phone] US Environmental Protection Agency [phone]
8.10.1 Potential for Environmental Liabilities The potential for environmental liabilities was identified in relation to demolition and abatement of building materials as well as existing groundwater impacts as discussed in Section 8.10 above. 8.11 WETLANDS Review of historical aerial photographs, topographic maps, and the United Stated Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map did not indicate the presence of wetlands, ponds, or streams located on the subject property. During the site reconnaissance no on-site marshy areas, ponds of water, low-lying areas, or streams were identified.
8.12 HIGH-VOLTAGE POWERLINES
No high-power transmission lines were noted within a 500-foot approximate minimum search distance of the subject property. Above-ground electric supply lines were observed along the southern and western boundaries of the subject property. Based on the absence of major
transmission lines in close proximity and non-residential occupancy, an electromotive force (EMF) survey was not indicated and was not conducted.

Appendices

This copy of the report is not exhaustive. The full version of this
assessment may include additional appendix materials that are not
contained herein due to practical or technological limitations.
Those additional materials are available to the Client and relying
parties on request and are hereby incorporated by reference.

Appendix A
Figures

Source: Raleigh West, Raleigh East, NC Quadrangle, USGS 7.5 minute series Topographic Map, Photo-revised 1993
Not to Scale

N

TOPOGRAPHIC MAP

NORTH HILLS NHX REDEVELOPMENT
4217 SIX FORKS ROAD
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609

Targus Project T19-4079

Subject Property

N

SITE (VICINITY) MAP

NORTH HILLS - NHX REDEVELOPMENT
MULTIPLE ADDRESSES
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609

Targus Project T19-4079

Source: Google Earth, 2018
Not to Scale

Source: Google Earth, 2018
Not to Scale
Subject Property
Subject Property

Appendix B
Photographs

North Hills NHX Redevelopment
Targus Project T19-4079
Date of Photographs: October 10 and 11, 2019

1. Exterior view of the on-site JCPenney. 2. General interior view of the JCPenney’s retail area.
3.View of the parking garage located on the southern
portion of the subject property.
4. View of the maintenance shop located in the
parking garage.
5. View of the various gasoline/ diesel containers
located within the maintenance shop.
6. Representative view of a pad-mounted transformer
located on the subject property.

North Hills NHX Redevelopment
Targus Project T19-4079
Date of Photographs: October 10 and 11, 2019

7. Representative view of the accessible hydraulic
elevator pit.

8. View of the rooftop HVAC unit at the JCPenney’s
building.

9. Representative view of an aboveground used
cooking oil dumpster/ container.
10. Representative view of an on-site hydraulic trash
compactor and solid waste dumpsters.
11. Representative view of a monitoring well located
on-site.

12. View of an on-site commercial/ retail building.

North Hills NHX Redevelopment
Targus Project T19-4079
Date of Photographs: October 10 and 11, 2019
13. Maintenance chemicals in an on-site flammable
closet.

14. Representative view of on-site stained concrete
surfaces.
15. Representative view of the on-site air compressor. 16. Representative view of the polyethylene water
tank.
17. View of the 55-gallon drum for containing
stormwater from the garage sump.

18. View of an on-site floor drain.

Appendix C
Historical Research Documentation
Image Provided By EDR Aerials
Boundaries are approximate
AERIAL - 2014
Not to Scale
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Multiple Addresses
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment
Image Provided By Targus Associates
Boundaries are approximate
AERIAL - 2005
Not to Scale
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Multiple Addresses
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment
Image Provided By Targus Associates
Boundaries are approximate
AERIAL - 1993
Not to Scale
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Multiple Addresses
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment
Image Provided By Targus Associates
Boundaries are approximate
AERIAL - 1983
Not to Scale
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Multiple Addresses
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment
Image Provided By Targus Associates
Boundaries are approximate
AERIAL - 1971
Not to Scale
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Multiple Addresses
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment
Image Provided By Targus Associates
Boundaries are approximate
AERIAL - 1965
Not to Scale
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Multiple Addresses
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment
Image Provided By Targus Associates
Boundaries are approximate
AERIAL - 1959
Not to Scale
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Multiple Addresses
North Hills - NHX Redevelopment
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com
North Hills NHX Redevelopment
4217 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
October 04, 2019
5817008.3
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Certified Sanborn Results:
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
page-
The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million
fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris &
Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track
historical property usage in approximately 12,000
American cities and towns. Collections searched:
Library of Congress
University Publications of America
EDR Private Collection
The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™
Limited Permission To Make Copies
Sanborn® Library search results
Contact:EDR Inquiry #
Site Name: Client Name:
Certification #
PO #
Project
10/04/19
4217 Six Forks Road
North Hills NHX Redevelopment Targus Associates
1900 Diplomat Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
5817008.3
Dallas, TX 75234
Tawanna Williams
The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Targus Associates were
identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection
includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is
authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results
can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn.
The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the
day this report was generated.
E2EA-45EE-9041
T19-4079
UNMAPPED PROPERTY
North Hills NHX Redevelopment
This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library,
LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target
property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property
were not found.
Certification #: E2EA-45EE-9041
Targus Associates (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report
solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the
client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their
agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request.
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2019 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
5817008 3 2
DATE: 10-9-2019

TAWANNA WILLIAMS

TARGUS ASSOCIATES
1900 DIPLOMAT DRIVE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75234

TARGUS: T19-4079
CHAIN OF TITLE

TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

126 SCEPTRE DRIVE TEL: (972) 772-4283
ROCKWALL, TEXAS 75032 FAX: (972) 772-4283

95 YEAR ENVIRONMENTAL SEARCH

THE ATTACHED REPORT IS BEING PROVIDED TO APPLICANT SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING LANDOWNER OR PURCHASE DEFENSES WHICH MAY BE AVAILABLE UNDER THE LIABILITY ACT OF 1980, AS AMENDED. IT IS PROVIDED FOR THE SOLE USE AND BENEFIT OF APPLICANT AND MAY NOT BE
USED OR RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY FOR ANY REASON.
NOTE: THIS SEARCH REPRESENTS SURFACE CONVEYANCES ONLY. TOTAL LIABILITY OF TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMPANY
IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.
THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN AN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD INSPECTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY.

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL: 0326268, LASSITER MILL ROAD, WAKE COUNTY,
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA.

CURRENT OWNER: NORTH HILLS OWNER L.P.

DATE : JANUARY 2, 2019
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NORTH HILLS OWNER L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS OWNER L.P.
FILE NO. : 17331417

DATE : JULY 3, 2014
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NHM OWNER 1 L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS OWNER L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 157111948

DATE : DECEMBER 22, 2004
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NHMOO L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NHM OWNER 1 L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 111552060

T19-4079 (1)

DATE : JANUARY 12, 2001
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NAGS HEAD PROPERTIES L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NHMOO L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 8780196

DATE : AUGUST 28, 1998
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NORTH HILLS MALL L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NAGS HEAD PROPERTIES L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 81342194

DATE : DECEMBER 31, 1997
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : P.F. PROPERTIES L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS MALL L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 7830410

DATE : APRIL 29, 1997
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NORTH HILLS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
GRANTEE : P.F. PROPERTIES L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 7437149

T19-4079 (2)
DATE : AUGUST 13, 1981
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : ALGIE I STEVENS
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
FILE NO. : 2951150

DATE : OCTOBER 10, 1978
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : WALTER H. EMORY
GRANTEE : ALGIE I STEVENS
FILE NO. : 2668483

DATE : DECEMBER 21, 1977
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : LUNA P. COOPER
GRANTEE : WALTER H. EMORY
FILE NO. : 2574691

DATE : OCTOBER 8, 1977
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : JOHN EDWARD COOPER, ET AL
GRANTEE : LUNA P. COOPER
FILE NO. : 2573927

T19-4079 (3)
DATE : OCTOBER 10, 1960
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : J.W. PHILLIPS
GRANTEE : JOHN EDWARD COOPER, ET AL
FILE NO. : 1424438

DATE : DECEMBER 16, 1917
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : W.C. BREWER
GRANTEE : J.W. PHILLIPS
FILE NO. : 352135

EASEMENTS : UTILITY EASEMENT.

T19-4079 (4)

ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN RESEARCH

AFTER COMPLETING AN ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN SEARCH A

FINDING THAT NO ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS HAVE BEEN FILED
OF PUBLIC RECORD AND THAT IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT

THE PROPERTY RESEARCHED IN THIS REPORT COMPLIES WITH
ASTM E 1527-13-SEC. 8.3.4.4 AND SECTION 6.2

THIS REPORT MEETS OR EXCEEDS A.S.T.M. E 1527-13.
DATE: 10-8-2019

TAWANNA WILLIAMS

TARGUS ASSOCIATES
1900 DIPLOMAT DRIVE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75234

TARGUS: T19-4079
CHAIN OF TITLE

TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

126 SCEPTRE DRIVE TEL: (972) 772-4283
ROCKWALL, TEXAS 75032 FAX: (972) 772-4283

95 YEAR ENVIRONMENTAL SEARCH

THE ATTACHED REPORT IS BEING PROVIDED TO APPLICANT SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING LANDOWNER OR PURCHASE DEFENSES WHICH MAY BE AVAILABLE UNDER THE LIABILITY ACT OF 1980, AS AMENDED. IT IS PROVIDED FOR THE SOLE USE AND BENEFIT OF APPLICANT AND MAY NOT BE
USED OR RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY FOR ANY REASON.
NOTE: THIS SEARCH REPRESENTS SURFACE CONVEYANCES ONLY. TOTAL LIABILITY OF TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMPANY
IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.
THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN AN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD INSPECTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY.

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL: 0326265, 4217 LASSITER MILL ROAD, WAKE
COUNTY, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA.

CURRENT OWNER: NHMOO L.L.C.

DATE : JANUARY 12, 2001
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NAGS HEAD PROPERTIES L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NHMOO L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 8780196

DATE : AUGUST 28, 1998
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NORTH HILLS MALL L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NAGS HEAD PROPERTIES L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 81342194

DATE : DECEMBER 31, 1997
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : P.F. PROPERTIES L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS MALL L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 7830410

T19-4079 (1)
DATE : APRIL 29, 1997
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NORTH HILLS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
GRANTEE : P.F. PROPERTIES L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 7437149

DATE : AUGUST 13, 1981
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : ALGIE I STEVENS
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
FILE NO. : 2951150

DATE : OCTOBER 10, 1978
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : WALTER H. EMORY
GRANTEE : ALGIE I STEVENS
FILE NO. : 2668483

DATE : DECEMBER 21, 1977
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : LUNA P. COOPER
GRANTEE : WALTER H. EMORY
FILE NO. : 2574691

T19-4079 (2)

DATE : OCTOBER 8, 1977
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : JOHN EDWARD COOPER, ET AL
GRANTEE : LUNA P. COOPER
FILE NO. : 2573927

DATE : DECEMBER 11, 1918
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : J.W. PHILLIPS
GRANTEE : JOHN EDWARD COOPER, ET AL
FILE NO. : 334132

EASEMENTS : UTILITY EASEMENT.

T19-4079 (3)

ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN RESEARCH

AFTER COMPLETING AN ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN SEARCH A

FINDING THAT NO ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS HAVE BEEN FILED
OF PUBLIC RECORD AND THAT IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT

THE PROPERTY RESEARCHED IN THIS REPORT COMPLIES WITH
ASTM E 1527-13-SEC. 8.3.4.4 AND SECTION 6.2

THIS REPORT MEETS OR EXCEEDS A.S.T.M. E 1527-13.
DATE: 10-9-2019

TAWANNA WILLIAMS

TARGUS ASSOCIATES
1900 DIPLOMAT DRIVE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75234

TARGUS: T19-4079
CHAIN OF TITLE

TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

126 SCEPTRE DRIVE TEL: (972) 772-4283
ROCKWALL, TEXAS 75032 FAX: (972) 772-4283

95 YEAR ENVIRONMENTAL SEARCH

THE ATTACHED REPORT IS BEING PROVIDED TO APPLICANT SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING LANDOWNER OR PURCHASE DEFENSES WHICH MAY BE AVAILABLE UNDER THE LIABILITY ACT OF 1980, AS AMENDED. IT IS PROVIDED FOR THE SOLE USE AND BENEFIT OF APPLICANT AND MAY NOT BE
USED OR RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY FOR ANY REASON.
NOTE: THIS SEARCH REPRESENTS SURFACE CONVEYANCES ONLY. TOTAL LIABILITY OF TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMPANY
IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.
THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN AN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD INSPECTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY.

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL: 0347221, LASSITER MILL ROAD, WAKE COUNTY,
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA.

CURRENT OWNER: NHM OWNER 1 L.L.C.

DATE : DECEMBER 22, 2004
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NHMOO L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NHM OWNER 1 L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 111552060

DATE : JANUARY 12, 2001
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NAGS HEAD PROPERTIES L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NHMOO L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 8780196

DATE : AUGUST 28, 1998
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NORTH HILLS MALL L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NAGS HEAD PROPERTIES L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 81342194

T19-4079 (1)
DATE : DECEMBER 31, 1997
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : P.F. PROPERTIES L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS MALL L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 7830410

DATE : APRIL 29, 1997
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NORTH HILLS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
GRANTEE : P.F. PROPERTIES L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 7437149

DATE : AUGUST 13, 1981
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : ALGIE I STEVENS
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
FILE NO. : 2951150

DATE : OCTOBER 10, 1978
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : WALTER H. EMORY
GRANTEE : ALGIE I STEVENS
FILE NO. : 2668483

T19-4079 (2)
DATE : DECEMBER 21, 1977
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : LUNA P. COOPER
GRANTEE : WALTER H. EMORY
FILE NO. : 2574691

DATE : OCTOBER 8, 1977
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : JOHN EDWARD COOPER, ET AL
GRANTEE : LUNA P. COOPER
FILE NO. : 2573927
DATE : OCTOBER 10, 1960
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : J.W. PHILLIPS
GRANTEE : JOHN EDWARD COOPER, ET AL
FILE NO. : 1424438

DATE : DECEMBER 16, 1917
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : W.C. BREWER
GRANTEE : J.W. PHILLIPS
FILE NO. : 352135

EASEMENTS : UTILITY EASEMENT.

T19-4079 (3)

ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN RESEARCH

AFTER COMPLETING AN ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN SEARCH A

FINDING THAT NO ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS HAVE BEEN FILED OF PUBLIC RECORD AND THAT IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT

THE PROPERTY RESEARCHED IN THIS REPORT COMPLIES WITH ASTM E 1527-13-SEC. 8.3.4.4 AND SECTION 6.2

THIS REPORT MEETS OR EXCEEDS A.S.T.M. E 1527-13.
DATE: 10-9-2019

TAWANNA WILLIAMS

TARGUS ASSOCIATES
1900 DIPLOMAT DRIVE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75234

TARGUS: T19-4079
CHAIN OF TITLE

TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

126 SCEPTRE DRIVE TEL: (972) 772-4283
ROCKWALL, TEXAS 75032 FAX: (972) 772-4283

95 YEAR ENVIRONMENTAL SEARCH

THE ATTACHED REPORT IS BEING PROVIDED TO APPLICANT SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING LANDOWNER OR PURCHASE DEFENSES WHICH MAY BE AVAILABLE UNDER THE LIABILITY ACT OF 1980, AS AMENDED. IT IS PROVIDED FOR THE SOLE USE AND BENEFIT OF APPLICANT AND MAY NOT BE
USED OR RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY FOR ANY REASON.
NOTE: THIS SEARCH REPRESENTS SURFACE CONVEYANCES ONLY. TOTAL LIABILITY OF TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMPANY
IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.
THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN AN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD INSPECTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY.

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL: 0051361, 4381 LASSITER MILL ROAD, WAKE
COUNTY, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA.

CURRENT OWNER: NORTH HILLS OWNER L.P.

DATE : JANUARY 2, 2019
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NORTH HILLS OWNER L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS OWNER L.P.
FILE NO. : 17331417

DATE : JULY 3, 2014
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NHM OWNER 1 L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS OWNER L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 157111948

DATE : DECEMBER 22, 2004
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NHMOO L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NHM OWNER 1 L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 111552060

T19-4079 (1)

DATE : JANUARY 12, 2001
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NAGS HEAD PROPERTIES L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NHMOO L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 8780196

DATE : AUGUST 28, 1998
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NORTH HILLS MALL L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NAGS HEAD PROPERTIES L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 81342194

DATE : DECEMBER 31, 1997
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : P.F. PROPERTIES L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS MALL L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 7830410

DATE : APRIL 29, 1997
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NORTH HILLS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
GRANTEE : P.F. PROPERTIES L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 7437149

T19-4079 (2)
DATE : AUGUST 13, 1981
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : ALGIE I STEVENS
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
FILE NO. : 2951150

DATE : OCTOBER 10, 1978
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : WALTER H. EMORY
GRANTEE : ALGIE I STEVENS
FILE NO. : 2668483

DATE : DECEMBER 21, 1977
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : LUNA P. COOPER
GRANTEE : WALTER H. EMORY
FILE NO. : 2574691

DATE : OCTOBER 8, 1977
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : JOHN EDWARD COOPER, ET AL
GRANTEE : LUNA P. COOPER
FILE NO. : 2573927

T19-4079 (3)
DATE : OCTOBER 10, 1960
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : J.W. PHILLIPS
GRANTEE : JOHN EDWARD COOPER, ET AL
FILE NO. : 1424438

DATE : DECEMBER 16, 1917
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : W.C. BREWER
GRANTEE : J.W. PHILLIPS
FILE NO. : 352135

EASEMENTS : UTILITY EASEMENT.

T19-4079 (4)

ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN RESEARCH

AFTER COMPLETING AN ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN SEARCH A

FINDING THAT NO ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS HAVE BEEN FILED
OF PUBLIC RECORD AND THAT IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT

THE PROPERTY RESEARCHED IN THIS REPORT COMPLIES WITH
ASTM E 1527-13-SEC. 8.3.4.4 AND SECTION 6.2

THIS REPORT MEETS OR EXCEEDS A.S.T.M. E 1527-13.
DATE: 10-8-2019

TAWANNA WILLIAMS

TARGUS ASSOCIATES
1900 DIPLOMAT DRIVE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75234

TARGUS: T19-4079
CHAIN OF TITLE

TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

126 SCEPTRE DRIVE TEL: (972) 772-4283
ROCKWALL, TEXAS 75032 FAX: (972) 772-4283

95 YEAR ENVIRONMENTAL SEARCH

THE ATTACHED REPORT IS BEING PROVIDED TO APPLICANT SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING LANDOWNER OR PURCHASE DEFENSES WHICH MAY BE AVAILABLE UNDER THE LIABILITY ACT OF 1980, AS AMENDED. IT IS PROVIDED FOR THE SOLE USE AND BENEFIT OF APPLICANT AND MAY NOT BE
USED OR RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY FOR ANY REASON.
NOTE: THIS SEARCH REPRESENTS SURFACE CONVEYANCES ONLY. TOTAL LIABILITY OF TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMPANY
IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.
THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN AN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD INSPECTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY.

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL: 0326266, 4321 LASSITER AT NORTH HILLS AVENUE,
WAKE COUNTY, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA.

CURRENT OWNER: NORTH HILLS UNIT 6 OWNER L.P.

DATE : JANUARY 2, 2019
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NORTH HILLS UNIT 6 OWNER L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS UNIT 6 OWNER L.P.
FILE NO. : 17331425

DATE : JULY 3, 2014
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NHMOO L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS UNIT 6 OWNER L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 157111941

DATE : JANUARY 12, 2001
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NAGS HEAD PROPERTIES L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NHMOO L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 8780196

T19-4079 (1)
DATE : AUGUST 28, 1998
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NORTH HILLS MALL L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NAGS HEAD PROPERTIES L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 81342194

DATE : DECEMBER 31, 1997
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : P.F. PROPERTIES L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS MALL L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 7830410

DATE : APRIL 29, 1997
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NORTH HILLS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
GRANTEE : P.F. PROPERTIES L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 7437149

DATE : AUGUST 13, 1981
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : ALGIE I STEVENS
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
FILE NO. : 2951150

T19-4079 (2)
DATE : OCTOBER 10, 1978
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : WALTER H. EMORY
GRANTEE : ALGIE I STEVENS
FILE NO. : 2668483

DATE : DECEMBER 21, 1977
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : LUNA P. COOPER
GRANTEE : WALTER H. EMORY
FILE NO. : 2574691

DATE : OCTOBER 8, 1977
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : JOHN EDWARD COOPER, ET AL
GRANTEE : LUNA P. COOPER
FILE NO. : 2573927

DATE : DECEMBER 11, 1918
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : J.W. PHILLIPS
GRANTEE : JOHN EDWARD COOPER, ET AL
FILE NO. : 334132
EASEMENTS : UTILITY EASEMENT.
T19-4079 (3)

ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN RESEARCH

AFTER COMPLETING AN ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN SEARCH A

FINDING THAT NO ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS HAVE BEEN FILED
OF PUBLIC RECORD AND THAT IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT

THE PROPERTY RESEARCHED IN THIS REPORT COMPLIES WITH
ASTM E 1527-13-SEC. 8.3.4.4 AND SECTION 6.2

THIS REPORT MEETS OR EXCEEDS A.S.T.M. E 1527-13.
DATE: 10-8-2019

TAWANNA WILLIAMS

TARGUS ASSOCIATES
1900 DIPLOMAT DRIVE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75234

TARGUS: T19-4079
CHAIN OF TITLE

TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

126 SCEPTRE DRIVE TEL: (972) 772-4283
ROCKWALL, TEXAS 75032 FAX: (972) 772-4283

95 YEAR ENVIRONMENTAL SEARCH

THE ATTACHED REPORT IS BEING PROVIDED TO APPLICANT SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING LANDOWNER OR PURCHASE DEFENSES WHICH MAY BE AVAILABLE UNDER THE LIABILITY ACT OF 1980, AS AMENDED. IT IS PROVIDED FOR THE SOLE USE AND BENEFIT OF APPLICANT AND MAY NOT BE
USED OR RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY FOR ANY REASON.
NOTE: THIS SEARCH REPRESENTS SURFACE CONVEYANCES ONLY. TOTAL LIABILITY OF TEXAS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMPANY
IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.
THIS REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN AN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD INSPECTION OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY.

LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL: 0306023, 4100 MAIN AT NORTH HILLS STREET,
WAKE COUNTY, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA.

CURRENT OWNER: BLACK SAPPHIRE D RALEIGH.

DATE : MAY 22, 2015
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : KANE CONCORD HOTEL L.L.C.
GRANTEE : BLACK SAPPHIRE D RALEIGH
FILE NO. : 16024112

DATE : DECEMBER 14, 2006
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NHM-HOTEL L.L.C.
GRANTEE : KANE CONCORD HOTEL L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 123102212

DATE : DECEMBER 14, 2006
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NHMOO L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NHM-HOTEL L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 123102212

T19-4079 (1)
DATE : JANUARY 12, 2001
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NAGS HEAD PROPERTIES L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NHMOO L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 8780196

DATE : AUGUST 28, 1998
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NORTH HILLS MALL L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NAGS HEAD PROPERTIES L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 81342194

DATE : DECEMBER 31, 1997
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : P.F. PROPERTIES L.L.C.
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS MALL L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 7830410

DATE : APRIL 29, 1997
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : NORTH HILLS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
GRANTEE : P.F. PROPERTIES L.L.C.
FILE NO. : 7437149

T19-4079 (2)
DATE : AUGUST 13, 1981
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : ALGIE I STEVENS
GRANTEE : NORTH HILLS PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
FILE NO. : 2951150

DATE : OCTOBER 10, 1978
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : WALTER H. EMORY
GRANTEE : ALGIE I STEVENS
FILE NO. : 2668483

DATE : DECEMBER 21, 1977
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : LUNA P. COOPER
GRANTEE : WALTER H. EMORY
FILE NO. : 2574691

DATE : AUGUST 10, 1956
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : J.A. COOPER ESTATE
GRANTEE : LUNA P. COOPER
FILE NO. : 1119474

T19-4079 (3)

DATE : DECEMBER 11, 1918
INSTRUMENT: WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR : J.W. PHILLIPS
GRANTEE : J.A. COOPER ESTATE
FILE NO. : 334132

EASEMENTS : UTILITY EASEMENT.

T19-4079 (4)

ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN RESEARCH

AFTER COMPLETING AN ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN SEARCH A

FINDING THAT NO ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS HAVE BEEN FILED
OF PUBLIC RECORD AND THAT IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT

THE PROPERTY RESEARCHED IN THIS REPORT COMPLIES WITH
ASTM E 1527-13-SEC. 8.3.4.4 AND SECTION 6.2

THIS REPORT MEETS OR EXCEEDS A.S.T.M. E 1527-13.

Appendix D
Regulatory Records Documentation
FORM-LBD-GON
®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
North Hills NHX Redevelopment
4217 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Inquiry Number: 5817008.2s
October 04, 2019
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary 81
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting Source Map A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
TC5817008.2s Page 1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2019 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5817008.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
4217 SIX FORKS ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27609
COORDINATES
35.8370040 - 35˚ 50’ 13.21’’Latitude (North):
78.6442110 - 78˚ 38’ 39.15’’Longitude (West):
Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator:
712781.8UTM X (Meters):
3968232.0UTM Y (Meters):
366 ft. above sea levelElevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
5948670 RALEIGH WEST, NCTarget Property Map:
2013Version Date:
5948668 RALEIGH EAST, NCEast Map:
2013Version Date:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
20140618Portions of Photo from:
USDASource:
5817008.2s Page 2
39 DOETSCH PROPERTY (JE 121 DARTMOUTH ROAD LUST, LUST TRUST, INST CONTROL Lower 1594, 0.302, ENE
G38 LATTIMORE, GEORGE F. 4401 CAMELOT DR LUST, LUST TRUST, IMD Higher 1369, 0.259, NE
G37 LATTIMORE, GEORGE F. 4401 CAMELOT DRIVE RGA LUST Higher 1369, 0.259, NE
G36 LATTIMORE PROPERTY ( 4401 CAMELOT DRIVE RGA LUST Higher 1369, 0.259, NE
G35 LATTIMORE, GEORGE PR 4401 CAMELOT DRIVE RGA LUST Higher 1369, 0.259, NE
G34 LATTIMORE, GEORGE F. 4401 CAMELOT DR RGA LUST Higher 1369, 0.259, NE
G33 LATTIMORE, GEORGE F. 4401 CAMELOT DR IMD Higher 1369, 0.259, NE
F32 KIRKHART RESIDENCE ( 604 MACON PLACE LUST, IMD Higher 1314, 0.249, NW
F31 KIRKHART, KEVIN - RE 604 MACON PLACE RGA LUST Higher 1314, 0.249, NW
F30 KIRKHART KEVIN RESID 604 MACON PLACE RGA LUST Higher 1314, 0.249, NW
F29 KIRKHART RESIDENCE ( 604 MACON PLACE RGA LUST Higher 1314, 0.249, NW
D28 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS 4441 SIX FORKS RD EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 852, 0.161, NNE
27 WHEELS FOR WISHES 4208 SIX FORKS ROAD SWRCY Lower 821, 0.155, East
E26 FIRST UNION BANK(BTI 4300 SIX FORKS ROAD RGA LUST Higher 775, 0.147, NE
E25 FIRST UNION BANK(BTI 4300 SIX FORKS RD RGA LUST Higher 775, 0.147, NE
E24 FIRST UNION BANK(BTI 4300 SIX FORKS RD LUST, LUST TRUST, IMD Higher 775, 0.147, NE
E23 FIRST UNION BANK 4300 SIX FORKS RD. RGA LUST Higher 775, 0.147, NE
D22 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS 4421 SIX FORKS RD EDR Hist Cleaner Higher 745, 0.141, NNE
D21 NORTH HILL CLEANERS 4421 SIX FORKS RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 745, 0.141, NNE
20 TARGET STORE T1892 4191 THE CIRCLE AT N RCRA-LQG Lower 525, 0.099, ESE
B19 NORTH HILLS EXXON 4359 SIX FORKS RD RCRA-VSQG, LUST TRUST Higher 489, 0.093, NE
B18 PAYNE SERVICES INC 4359 SIX FORKS RD EDR Hist Auto Higher 489, 0.093, NE
B17 EXXON 4-0010 NORTH H 4359 SIX FORKS ROAD INST CONTROL, IMD Higher 489, 0.093, NE
B16 EXXON 4-0010 NORTH H 4359 SIX FORKS ROAD RGA LUST Higher 489, 0.093, NE
B15 EXXON 4-0010 NORTH H 4359 SIX FORKS RD RGA LUST Higher 489, 0.093, NE
B14 EXXON 4-0010 N HILLS 4359 SIX FORKS ROAD RGA LUST Higher 489, 0.093, NE
B13 NORTH HILLS EXXON SE 4359 SIX FORKS ROAD LUST, UST, Financial Assurance Higher 489, 0.093, NE
B12 EXXON-NORTH HILLS 4359 SIX FORKS RD. RGA LUST Higher 489, 0.093, NE
C11 NORTH HILLS LAUNDRY 4201D SIX FORKS ROAD DRYCLEANERS Higher 426, 0.081, East
B10 FIRESTONE TIRE CENTE 100 N HILLS SHOPPING LUST Higher 405, 0.077, NE
C9 BROTHERS CLEANERS 4221 SIX FORKS RD DRYCLEANERS Higher 395, 0.075, ENE
C8 BROTHERS CLEANERS 4221 SIX FORKS RD RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 395, 0.075, ENE
C7 NCDSCA 092-0017 (BRO 4221 SIX FORKS RD, S RCRA-SQG Higher 395, 0.075, ENE
B6 FIRESTONE TIRE CENTE 100 N. HILLS SHOPPIN IMD Higher 347, 0.066, NE
B5 FIRESTONE STORE 05Y/ 100 NORTH HILLS SOUT UST Higher 347, 0.066, NE
A4 JC PENNY 1603 4217 SIX FORKS ROAD ASBESTOS TP
A3 NORTH HILLS MALL 4217 SIX FORKS RD BROWNFIELDS TP
A2 NORTH HILLS MALL (NH 4217 SIX FORKS RD RCRA NonGen / NLR TP
A1 NORTH HILLS MALL 4217 SIX FORKS RD FINDS, ECHO TP
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
4217 SIX FORKS ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27609
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS
5817008.2s Page 3
55 PERRY PROPERTY 4401 YADKIN DRIVE LUST, LUST TRUST, INST CONTROL Lower 2599, 0.492, NW
54 ELLIS PROPERTY (HELE 4217 LAMBETH DRIVE LUST Lower 2565, 0.486, ENE
K53 FERRELL ESTATE PROPE 3708 ROCK CREEK DRIV LUST, LUST TRUST Lower 2514, 0.476, SE
K52 FERRELL ESTATE PROPE 3708 ROCK CREEK DRIV RGA LUST Lower 2514, 0.476, SE
L51 ST. MARKS METHODIST 4801 SIX FORKS ROAD RGA LUST Higher 2475, 0.469, North
L50 ST. MARKS METHODIST 4801 SIX FORKS ROAD LUST Higher 2475, 0.469, North
K49 PALMER RESIDENCE (BE 3627 ROCK CREEK DR RGA LUST Lower 2457, 0.465, SE
K48 PALMER RESIDENCE (BE 3627 ROCK CREEK DR LUST, LUST TRUST Lower 2457, 0.465, SE
I47 WYCHEL PROPERTY (DAV 221 DARTMOUTH ROAD LUST Lower 2307, 0.437, East
J46 JOHNSON RESIDENCE (H 222 REYNOLDS ROAD RGA LUST Lower 2166, 0.410, ENE
J45 JOHNSON RESIDENCE (H 222 REYNOLDS ROAD LUST, LUST TRUST, IMD Lower 2166, 0.410, ENE
I44 HOWELL ESTATE PROPER 210 DARTMOUTH ROAD LUST Lower 2076, 0.393, East
H43 LAMBERT PROPERTY (TO 217 LYNWOOD LANE RGA LUST Lower 1863, 0.353, ENE
H42 LAMBERT PROPERTY (AI 217 LYNWOOD LANE RGA LUST Lower 1863, 0.353, ENE
H41 LAMBERT, TOM - PROPE 217 LYNWOOD LANE RGA LUST Lower 1863, 0.353, ENE
H40 LAMBERT PROPERTY (TO 217 LYNWOOD LANE LUST, LUST TRUST, IMD Lower 1863, 0.353, ENE
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
4217 SIX FORKS ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27609
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5817008.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this
property see page 8 of the attached EDR Radius Map report:
EPA IDDatabase(s)Site
NORTH HILLS MALL
4217 SIX FORKS RD
RALEIGH, NC 27609
N/AFINDS
Registry ID:: 110004011961
ECHO
Registry ID: 110004011961
NORTH HILLS MALL (NH
4217 SIX FORKS RD
RALEIGH, NC 27609
NC0000056903RCRA NonGen / NLR
EPA ID:: NC0000056903
NORTH HILLS MALL
4217 SIX FORKS RD
RALEIGH, NC
N/ABROWNFIELDS
Project ID: 07013-03-092
JC PENNY 1603
4217 SIX FORKS ROAD
RALEIGH, NC
N/AASBESTOS
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5817008.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
DEBRIS Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
LCID Land-Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
AST AST Database
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5817008.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS Spills Incident Listing
Other Ascertainable Records
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5817008.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS Air Quality Permit Listing
COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP Animal Operation Permits Listing
CCB Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
SEPT HAULERS Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
PCSRP Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)
of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or
dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity
generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous
waste per month.
A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/25/2019 has revealed that there is 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC5817008.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 2 records.
Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________
CHESTNUT HILLS GULF SERVICE LUST
NORTH HILLS SHOPPING CENTER FINDS
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
138 kV 440400
360
440
360
280400400
40040040 0
320
3 2 0
3202402 8 0
360
360
360
3 603 60360 360360240
3 2 0360
32 0
320
3 2 0
320
3 20320320
320
320320 320280280280
280 2 8 0
28 0
28028028 0
2 8 0280280
200240
2
4020
0
2 0 0
200
2002002
4
0
2
424024 0 240240240240240240
2402 4 02402402402402402802
80 2802 8 02 80
3 2032028024028
280
2 802
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
138 kV
400
360 360360360360
320320
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS
Federal Delisted NPL site list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL
Federal CERCLIS list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF
Federal RCRA generators list
1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250RCRA-LQG
1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250RCRA-SQG
1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250RCRA-VSQG
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL
Federal ERNS list
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NC HSDS
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SHWS
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500OLI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LCID
TC5817008.2s Page 4
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LAST
15 NR NR 11 2 2 0.500LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST
9 NR NR 7 1 1 0.500LUST TRUST
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST
2 NR NR NR 0 2 0.250UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
3 NR NR 2 0 1 0.500INST CONTROL
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP
State and tribal Brownfields sites
1 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500 1BROWNFIELDS
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500HIST LF
1 NR NR 0 1 0 0.500SWRCY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL
Local Land Records
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2
Records of Emergency Release Reports
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS
8 NR NR 4 2 2 0.500IMD
TC5817008.2s Page 5
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
Other Ascertainable Records
3 NR NR NR 1 1 0.250 1RCRA NonGen / NLR
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPABANDONED MINES
1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1FINDS
1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1ECHO
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPAIRS
1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1ASBESTOS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH
2 NR NR NR 0 2 0.250DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPAOP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CCB
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSEPT HAULERS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PCSRP
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP
TC5817008.2s Page 6
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250EDR Hist Auto
2 NR NR NR 2 0 0.250EDR Hist Cleaner
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000RGA HWS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RGA LF
21 NR NR 11 6 4 0.500RGA LUST
74 0 0 35 15 19 5- Totals --
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC5817008.2s Page 7
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110004011961DFR URL:
110004011961Registry ID:
1016674064Envid:
ECHO:
additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report.
Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access
the state of North Carolina.
comprehensive information about environmental regulated entities in
common facility identifier in order to improve accessibility to
(NCDENR) Facility Identification Template for States that provides a
is North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources’
NC-FITS (North Carolina - Facility Identification Template For States)
corrective action activities required under RCRA.
program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and
and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA
events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport,
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of
RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource
Environmental Interest/Information System
110004011961Registry ID:
FINDS:
Site 1 of 4 in cluster A
Actual:
366 ft.

Property RALEIGH, NC 27609
Target ECHO4217 SIX FORKS RD N/A
A1 FINDSNORTH HILLS MALL 1016674064
Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription:
Non-GeneratorClassification:
04EPA Region:
Not reportedContact email:
919-291-8363Contact telephone:
USContact country:
RALEIGH, NC 27609
SIX FORKS RDContact address:
BOB RILEYContact:
RALEIGH, NC 27609
SIX FORKS RDMailing address:
NC0000056903EPA ID:
RALEIGH, NC 27609
4217 SIX FORKS RDFacility address:
NORTH HILLS MALL (NHMOO LLC)Facility name:
06/16/2004Date form received by agency:
RCRA NonGen / NLR:
Site 2 of 4 in cluster A
Actual:
366 ft.

Property RALEIGH, NC 27609
Target 4217 SIX FORKS RD NC0000056903
A2 RCRA NonGen / NLRNORTH HILLS MALL (NHMOO LLC)1004744275
TC5817008.2s Page 8
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
NoUsed oil transporter:
NoUsed oil transfer facility:
NoUsed oil Specification marketer:
NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner:
NoUser oil refiner:
NoUsed oil processor:
NoUsed oil fuel burner:
NoFurnace exemption:
NoOn-site burner exemption:
NoUnderground injection activity:
NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW:
NoTransporter of hazardous waste:
NoRecycler of hazardous waste:
NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive):
NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste:
Handler Activities Summary:
Not reportedOwner/Op end date:
01/01/2000Owner/Op start date:
OwnerOwner/Operator Type:
PrivateLegal status:
Not reportedOwner/operator extension:
Not reportedOwner/operator fax:
Not reportedOwner/operator email:
Not reportedOwner/operator telephone:
USOwner/operator country:
RALEIGH, NC 27609
4300 SIX FORKS RD SUITE 430Owner/operator address:
NHMOO LLCOwner/operator name:
Not reportedOwner/Op end date:
01/01/2000Owner/Op start date:
OperatorOwner/Operator Type:
PrivateLegal status:
Not reportedOwner/operator extension:
Not reportedOwner/operator fax:
Not reportedOwner/operator email:
Not reportedOwner/operator telephone:
USOwner/operator country:
NC
Not reportedOwner/operator address:
NHMOO LLCOwner/operator name:
Not reportedOwner/Op end date:
Not reportedOwner/Op start date:
OwnerOwner/Operator Type:
PrivateLegal status:
Not reportedOwner/operator extension:
Not reportedOwner/operator fax:
Not reportedOwner/operator email:
501-376-5251Owner/operator telephone:
Not reportedOwner/operator country:
LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201
1600 CANTRELLOwner/operator address:
DILLARDS DEPT STORESOwner/operator name:
Owner/Operator Summary:
NORTH HILLS MALL (NHMOO LLC) (Continued) 1004744275
TC5817008.2s Page 9
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
No violations foundViolation Status:
THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.
LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF
ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS
CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF
2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS
KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE,
THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name:
F005. Waste code:
MIXTURES.
BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT
MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL
SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR
CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED
NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS
MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT
ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT
ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL
THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name:
F003. Waste code:
IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name:
D001. Waste code:
Hazardous Waste Summary:
Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorClassification:
OKLAHOMA INSTALLATION CO #440Site name:
11/17/1993Date form received by agency:
Not a generator, verifiedClassification:
OKLAHOMA INSTALLATION CO #440Site name:
09/03/2003Date form received by agency:
Large Quantity GeneratorClassification:
NORTH HILLS MALL ( NHMOO LLC )Site name:
06/16/2004Date form received by agency:
Historical Generators:
NORTH HILLS MALL (NHMOO LLC) (Continued) 1004744275
759609.13517Y Coord:
2106559.808X Coord:
03/05/2008Status Date:
0BF Acreage:
Lisa TaberBF Manager:
07013-03-092Project ID:
No Further InterestProject Type:
RALEIGH, NCCity,State,Zip:
4217 SIX FORKS RDAddress:
NORTH HILLS MALLName:
BROWNFIELDS:
Site 3 of 4 in cluster A
Actual:
366 ft.

Property RALEIGH, NC
Target 4217 SIX FORKS RD N/A
A3 BROWNFIELDSNORTH HILLS MALL S123565366
TC5817008.2s Page 10
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
RType:
0Cubic Feet:
2,156Square Feet:
0Linear Feet:
Not reportedDemo End Date:
Not reportedDemo Start Date:
01-31-15Removal End Date:
01-27-15Removal Start Date:
[phone]Phone:
J C Penny IncOwner Name:
The Winter Construction CompanyContractor:
47798NESHAP Number:
NC25014Permit Number:
RALEIGH, NCCity,State,Zip:
4217 SIX FORKS ROAD STE 100Address:
JC PENNY 1603Name:
ASBESTOS:
Site 4 of 4 in cluster A
Actual:
366 ft.

Property RALEIGH, NC
Target 4217 SIX FORKS ROAD STE 100 N/A
A4 ASBESTOSJC PENNY 1603 S121479749
Single Wall SteelDecode for TCONS_KEY:
UnknownLeak Detection Name:
UnknownSpill Protection Name:
UnknownOverfill Protection Name:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
Not reportedManifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
550Tank Capacity:
Oil, New/Used/MixProduct Name:
03/29/1996Perm Close Date:
03/16/1968Installed Date:
RemovedTank Status:
1Tank Id:
0Longitude:
0Latitude:
WakeFIPS County Desc:
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145-0057Contact City/State/Zip:
Not reportedContact Address2:
PO BOX 45057Contact Address1:
J C PENNEY CORP. INC.Contact:
00-0-0000006004Facility Id:
RALEIGH, NC 27609City,State,Zip:
100 NORTH HILLS SOUTHAddress:
FIRESTONE STORE 05Y/017590Name:
UST:
347 ft. Site 1 of 11 in cluster B
0.066 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
385 ft.

< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC 27609
NE 100 NORTH HILLS SOUTH N/A
B5 USTFIRESTONE STORE 05Y/017590 U001435224
TC5817008.2s Page 11
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
UnknownDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for PCONS_KEY:
FIRESTONE STORE 05Y/017590 (Continued) U001435224
Not reported45 Day Report:
3/22/2004NORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
Closed OutIncident Phase:
5/21/2004Last Modified:
26412Facility ID:
DWMAgency:
7GPS:
78.6413888888889Longitude Decimal:
35.8383333333333Latitude Decimal:
783829Longitude Number:
355018Latitude Number:
-78.64138888Longitude:
35.83833333Latitude:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
Not reported7.5 Min Quad:
Not reportedSamples Include:
NoneSampled By:
Not reportedWells Contam:
Not reportedNum Affected:
NoWells Affected:
KAHDem Contact:
Not reportedPriority Update:
Not reportedPriority Code:
Not reportedSite Priority:
HRisk Site:
Not reportedSetting:
FacilityLocation:
Gasoline/dieselType:
Leak-undergroundSource:
Not reportedQty Recovered 1:
Not reportedQty Lost 1:
Not reportedMaterial:
CommercialOperation:
PrivateOwnership:
DALLAS, TX 75301-2105Oper City,St,Zip:
DALLASOperator City:
P.O. BOX 10001Operator Address:
J.C. PENNY COMPANY, INC.Owner Company:
Not reportedContact Phone:
RAYMOND EMMAOperator:
Gasoline DispenserIncident Desc:
NoSoil Contam:
Yes, Groundwater Contamination has been detectedGW Contam:
10/15/2003Submit Date:
7/1/1983Date Occurred:
26412Facility ID:
RALRegion:
IMD:
347 ft. Site 2 of 11 in cluster B
0.066 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
385 ft.

< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC
NE 100 N. HILLS SHOPPING CTR. N/A
B6 IMDFIRESTONE TIRE CENTER S105895951
TC5817008.2s Page 12
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Sighned:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
FIRESTONE TIRE CENTER (Continued) S105895951
Not reportedOwner/operator email:
Not reportedOwner/operator telephone:
USOwner/operator country:
RALEIGH, NC 27619
PO BOX 19107Owner/operator address:
OBERLIN ACQUISITION LLCOwner/operator name:
Not reportedOwner/Op end date:
09/12/2002Owner/Op start date:
OperatorOwner/Operator Type:
OtherLegal status:
Not reportedOwner/operator extension:
Not reportedOwner/operator fax:
Not reportedOwner/operator email:
919-508-8483Owner/operator telephone:
USOwner/operator country:
RALEIGH, NC 27699
MAIL SERVICE CTROwner/operator address:
PETITIONER(S) FOR DSCA SITE ID 092-0017Owner/operator name:
Owner/Operator Summary:
hazardous waste at any time
waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of
hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous
waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of
Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription:
Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification:
04EPA Region:
[e-mail] email:
919-508-8483Contact telephone:
USContact country:
RALEIGH, NC 27699
MAIL SERVICE CTRContact address:
DIANNE B THOMASContact:
RALEIGH, NC 27699
MAIL SERVICE CTRMailing address:
NCR000140392EPA ID:
RALEIGH, NC 27609
4221 SIX FORKS RD, SUITE 100Facility address:
NCDSCA 092-0017 (BROTHERS CLEANERS)Facility name:
09/10/2010Date form received by agency:
RCRA-SQG:
395 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster C
0.075 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
379 ft.

< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC 27609
ENE 4221 SIX FORKS RD, SUITE 100 NCR000140392
C7 RCRA-SQGNCDSCA 092-0017 (BROTHERS CLEANERS) 1009399530
TC5817008.2s Page 13
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND
ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F004, AND
USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE
TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE
ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND 1,1,2,
CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE,
METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE,
THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,. Waste name:
F002. Waste code:
Hazardous Waste Summary:
Small Quantity GeneratorClassification:
BROTHERS CLEANERS - NORTH HILLS MALLSite name:
10/25/2005Date form received by agency:
Small Quantity GeneratorClassification:
NCDSCA 092-0017 (BROTHERS CLEANERS)Site name:
07/11/2006Date form received by agency:
Large Quantity GeneratorClassification:
NCDSCA 092-0017 (BROTHERS CLEANERS)Site name:
07/05/2009Date form received by agency:
Large Quantity GeneratorClassification:
NCDSCA 092-0017 (BROTHERS CLEANERS)Site name:
02/22/2010Date form received by agency:
Large Quantity GeneratorClassification:
NCDSCA 092-0017(BROTHERS CLEANERS)Site name:
03/01/2010Date form received by agency:
Historical Generators:
NoUsed oil transporter:
NoUsed oil transfer facility:
NoUsed oil Specification marketer:
NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner:
NoUser oil refiner:
NoUsed oil processor:
NoUsed oil fuel burner:
NoFurnace exemption:
NoOn-site burner exemption:
NoUnderground injection activity:
NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW:
NoTransporter of hazardous waste:
NoRecycler of hazardous waste:
NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive):
NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste:
Handler Activities Summary:
Not reportedOwner/Op end date:
06/01/2001Owner/Op start date:
OwnerOwner/Operator Type:
PrivateLegal status:
Not reportedOwner/operator extension:
Not reportedOwner/operator fax:
NCDSCA 092-0017 (BROTHERS CLEANERS) (Continued) 1009399530
TC5817008.2s Page 14
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
No violations foundViolation Status:
SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.
NCDSCA 092-0017 (BROTHERS CLEANERS) (Continued) 1009399530
NoUsed oil transporter:
NoUsed oil transfer facility:
NoUsed oil Specification marketer:
NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner:
NoUser oil refiner:
NoUsed oil processor:
NoUsed oil fuel burner:
NoFurnace exemption:
NoOn-site burner exemption:
NoUnderground injection activity:
NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW:
NoTransporter of hazardous waste:
NoRecycler of hazardous waste:
NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive):
NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste:
Handler Activities Summary:
Not reportedOwner/Op end date:
10/25/2005Owner/Op start date:
OwnerOwner/Operator Type:
PrivateLegal status:
Not reportedOwner/operator extension:
Not reportedOwner/operator fax:
Not reportedOwner/operator email:
Not reportedOwner/operator telephone:
USOwner/operator country:
NC
Not reportedOwner/operator address:
OBERLIN ACQUISITION LLCOwner/operator name:
Owner/Operator Summary:
Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription:
Non-GeneratorClassification:
04EPA Region:
Not reportedContact email:
919-508-8400Contact telephone:
USContact country:
RALEIGH, NC 27606
OBERLIN RDContact address:
DIANNE THOMASContact:
RALEIGH, NC 27606
OBERLIN RDMailing address:
NCS000000411EPA ID:
RALEIGH, NC 27609
4221 SIX FORKS RDFacility address:
BROTHERS CLEANERSFacility name:
10/25/2005Date form received by agency:
RCRA NonGen / NLR:
395 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster C
0.075 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
379 ft.

< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC 27609
ENE 4221 SIX FORKS RD NCS000000411
C8 RCRA NonGen / NLRBROTHERS CLEANERS 1009217800
TC5817008.2s Page 15
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
No violations foundViolation Status:
BROTHERS CLEANERS (Continued) 1009217800
Certified in the DSCA ProgramComments:
367Object ID:
35.840174188Y Coordinates:
-78.643498853X Coordinates:
[phone]Phone Number:
Mike CunninghamProject Manager:
09/12/2002Certified Date:
The Lassiter At North HillsShopping Center:
35.840174187 -78.643498853Lat/Long:
Not reportedHCS Scale:
1 footHCS Res:
Shapefile: Wake_Property_2010_05.shp - Wake County GIS OfficeHCS Ref:
3HCS Code:
A1Rank:
LowPriority:
AssessmentStatus:
DC920017Facility ID:
RALEIGH, NC 27609-5715City,State,Zip:
4221 SIX FORKS RDAddress:
BROTHERS CLEANERSName:
DRYCLEANERS:
395 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster C
0.075 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
379 ft.

< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC 27609
ENE 4221 SIX FORKS RD N/A
C9 DRYCLEANERSBROTHERS CLEANERS S120705572
LRisk Class Based On Review:
HRisk Classification:
COMMERCIALCommercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
0# Of Supply Wells:
RTank Regulated Status:
ResidentialLevel Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
05/21/2004Close Out:
Not reportedClosure Request:
07/01/1983Cleanup:
07/01/1983Date Occur:
10/15/2003Date Reported:
PProduct Type:
Leak-undergroundSource Type:
GWContamination Type:
26412Incident Number:
RA-4775UST Number:
00-0-000Facility ID:
RALEIGH, NC 27609-City,State,Zip:
100 N. HILLS SHOPPING CTR.Address:
FIRESTONE TIRE CENTERName:
LUST:
405 ft. Site 3 of 11 in cluster B
0.077 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
384 ft.

< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC 27609
NE 100 N HILLS SHOPPING CTR N/A
B10 LUSTFIRESTONE TIRE CENTER S108664893
TC5817008.2s Page 16
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedRelease Code:
Not reportedPirf/Min Soil:
Not reported5 Minute Quad:
57#5 Minute Quad:
Not reportedSamples Include:
NWells Affected Y/N:
Not reportedPriority Update:
Not reportedSite Priority:
1Location:
3Type:
6Operation Type:
4Ownership:
Not reportedOwner/Operator:
Gasoline DispenserDescription Of Incident:
2003-10-15 00:00:00Date Reported:
1983-07-01 00:00:00Date Occurred:
26412Facility Id:
PIRF:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
Firestone’s Debra Hamlin and Hart & Hickman’s Matt Br
to Firestone, who is doing the work required of Penneys. Called
1/21/04- Sent NORR est. low risk and requiring SAR to Penneys(RP) and
12/ 20/2003- LSA received1/20/04: low risk, residential land use.Comments:
Not reportedRP County:
DALLAS, TX 75301-2105RP City,St,Zip:
P.O. BOX 10001RP Address:
Not reportedTelephone:
RAYMOND EMMAContact Person:
J.C. PENNY COMPANY, INC.Company:
RALRegion:
KAHRegional Officer Project Mgr:
Not reportedTestlat:
35.8386 -78.6423Lat/Long Decimal:
FalseValid:
NError Code:
0Error Flag:
FalseRPOP:
FalseRPOW:
28Reel Num:
262CD Num:
FalseRPL:
3PETOPT:
Cleanups to 2L.0202 standardsRBCA GW:
File Located in ArchivesCurrent Status:
0Release Detection:
Not reportedLUR Filed:
NoFlag1:
YesFlag:
NoMTBE1:
NoMTBE:
ResidentialLand Use:
Not reportedSite Risk Reason:
1Phase Of LSA Req:
Not reportedSite Priority:
Not reportedNORR Issue Date:
Not reportedNOV Issue Date:
Not reportedCorrective Action Plan Type:
FIRESTONE TIRE CENTER (Continued) S108664893
TC5817008.2s Page 17
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
156CD Num:
FalseRPL:
3PETOPT:
Not reportedRBCA GW:
File Located in ArchivesCurrent Status:
0Release Detection:
Not reportedLUR Filed:
NoFlag1:
YesFlag:
UnknownMTBE1:
NoMTBE:
Not reportedLand Use:
Not reportedSite Risk Reason:
Not reportedPhase Of LSA Req:
Not reportedSite Priority:
Not reportedNORR Issue Date:
Not reportedNOV Issue Date:
Not reportedCorrective Action Plan Type:
LRisk Class Based On Review:
LRisk Classification:
COMMERCIALCommercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
0# Of Supply Wells:
NTank Regulated Status:
ResidentialLevel Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
06/29/1996Close Out:
1996-07-16 00:00:00Closure Request:
03/26/1996Cleanup:
03/26/1996Date Occur:
07/16/1996Date Reported:
PProduct Type:
Leak-undergroundSource Type:
SLContamination Type:
33329Incident Number:
RA-486UST Number:
00-0-000Facility ID:
RALEIGH, NC 27609-City,State,Zip:
100 N HILLS SHOPPING CTRAddress:
FIRESTONE TIRE CENTERName:
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Signed:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
Not reportedIncident Phase:
Not reportedLast Modified:
AUst Number:
ASource:
Not reportedCause:
2Err Type:
Not reportedSource Code:
FIRESTONE TIRE CENTER (Continued) S108664893
TC5817008.2s Page 18
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Signed:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
Not reportedIncident Phase:
Not reportedLast Modified:
PUst Number:
Not reportedSource:
Not reportedCause:
2Err Type:
Not reportedSource Code:
Not reportedRelease Code:
Not reportedPirf/Min Soil:
Not reported5 Minute Quad:
Y7#5 Minute Quad:
Not reportedSamples Include:
NWells Affected Y/N:
Not reportedPriority Update:
Not reportedSite Priority:
1Location:
4Type:
6Operation Type:
4Ownership:
Not reportedOwner/Operator:
Not reportedDescription Of Incident:
1996-07-16 00:00:00Date Reported:
1996-03-26 00:00:00Date Occurred:
33329Facility Id:
PIRF:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
Not reportedComments:
Not reportedRP County:
ROLLING MEADOWS, NC 60008-RP City,St,Zip:
2550 WEST GOLF ROADRP Address:
8479812200Telephone:
DEBRS HAMLINContact Person:
BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC.Company:
RALRegion:
JFMRegional Officer Project Mgr:
Not reportedTestlat:
35.8386 -78.6424Lat/Long Decimal:
FalseValid:
NError Code:
0Error Flag:
FalseRPOP:
FalseRPOW:
127Reel Num:
FIRESTONE TIRE CENTER (Continued) S108664893
TC5817008.2s Page 19
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Raleigh 1965 City Directory, Cleaners & Dyers ListingComments:
3735Object ID:
35.8370825Y Coordinates:
-78.6409255X Coordinates:
Not reportedPhone Number:
Not reportedProject Manager:
Not reportedCertified Date:
Not reportedShopping Center:
35.8370825 -78.6409255Lat/Long:
Not reportedHCS Scale:
Not reportedHCS Res:
Google API GeocoderHCS Ref:
51HCS Code:
Not reportedRank:
Not reportedPriority:
City DirectoryStatus:
Not reportedFacility ID:
RALEIGH, NCCity,State,Zip:
4201D SIX FORKS ROADAddress:
NORTH HILLS LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANINGName:
DRYCLEANERS:
426 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster C
0.081 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
378 ft.

< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC
East 4201D SIX FORKS ROAD N/A
C11 DRYCLEANERSNORTH HILLS LAUNDRY & DRY CLEANING S125086597
2000 EXXON-NORTH HILLS 4359 SIX FORKS RD.
2001 EXXON-NORTH HILLS 4359 SIX FORKS RD.
2002 EXXON-NORTH HILLS 4359 SIX FORKS RD.
RGA LUST:
489 ft. Site 4 of 11 in cluster B
0.093 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
386 ft.

< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC
NE 4359 SIX FORKS RD. N/A
B12 RGA LUSTEXXON-NORTH HILLS S115617387
Not reportedClosure Request:
07/22/1998Cleanup:
04/17/1998Date Occur:
07/22/1998Date Reported:
PProduct Type:
Leak-undergroundSource Type:
GWContamination Type:
20113Incident Number:
RA-2968UST Number:
00-0-000Facility ID:
RALEIGH, NC 27609-City,State,Zip:
4359 SIX FORKS ROADAddress:
EXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLSName:
LUST:
489 ft. Site 5 of 11 in cluster B
0.093 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
386 ft.

< 1/8 Financial AssuranceRALEIGH, NC 27609
NE UST4359 SIX FORKS ROAD N/A
B13 LUSTNORTH HILLS EXXON SERVICES U003414839
TC5817008.2s Page 20
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
1/07 in MW35. VOCs in system effluent decreasing. 6/20/08. Potential
to increase surface area for FP vaporization. Benzene at 5,780ppb in
observed since (1/07 and 2/07 events). Note that socks were installed
(<0.22’) in MW1,10, & 11. System restarted 10/3/06 and no FP has been
system shutdown 9/14 to see if FP would rebound. FP did rebound
except for 20 days (9/14-10/3). FP not detected from 4/06 -9/06 so
events 7/11-12/06; 9/14/06, 1/3-4/07, and 2/19/07. SVE/AS operated,
required to confirm trend. 4/30/07 RMR report for 3/06 - 4/07: 4 mon.
levels are now below GCLs and next 1-2 years of monitoring will be
expense. 11/6/09 B decreased to max 3780 in /09 event ; dissolvd
sidegradient of MTBE plume, M-AA intend to replace it at NHMOO
construction at south end of MTBE contaminant plumes. BDL and
In 5/07, MW25 was abandoned as was located under area of hotel
in MW35, but socks are still in place and AS/SVE fully operational.
2/07. FP not detected by 1/07 and benzene is decreased to max. 5,780
4/27/07 most recent mon. report for evnts in 7/06, 9/06,1/07 andComments:
Not reportedRP County:
RALEIGH, NC 27609-RP City,St,Zip:
4359 SIX FORKS ROADRP Address:
Not reportedTelephone:
PHIL PAYNEContact Person:
PAYNE SERVICES, INC.Company:
RALRegion:
KAHRegional Officer Project Mgr:
Not reportedTestlat:
35.8392 -78.6426Lat/Long Decimal:
TrueValid:
NError Code:
0Error Flag:
FalseRPOP:
FalseRPOW:
Not reportedReel Num:
Not reportedCD Num:
FalseRPL:
3PETOPT:
Cleanups to alternate standardsRBCA GW:
File Located in HouseCurrent Status:
0Release Detection:
03/11/2015LUR Filed:
NoFlag1:
NoFlag:
YesMTBE1:
NoMTBE:
Industrial/commercialLand Use:
GSSite Risk Reason:
2Phase Of LSA Req:
60Site Priority:
02/13/2002NORR Issue Date:
Not reportedNOV Issue Date:
air sparging and soil vapor extractionCorrective Action Plan Type:
LRisk Class Based On Review:
HRisk Classification:
COMMERCIALCommercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
1# Of Supply Wells:
RTank Regulated Status:
ResidentialLevel Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
05/15/2015Close Out:
NORTH HILLS EXXON SERVICES (Continued) U003414839
TC5817008.2s Page 21
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Signed:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
2011-09-30 00:00:00NORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
Closed OutIncident Phase:
2003-05-31 00:00:00Last Modified:
Not reportedUst Number:
Not reportedSource:
Not reportedCause:
Not reportedErr Type:
PIRFSource Code:
Not reportedRelease Code:
Not reportedPirf/Min Soil:
15 Minute Quad:
37#5 Minute Quad:
Not reportedSamples Include:
NWells Affected Y/N:
1999-06-24 00:00:00Priority Update:
60ISite Priority:
1Location:
3Type:
6Operation Type:
4Ownership:
Not reportedOwner/Operator:
THERE IS FREE PRODUCT IN 3 MONITOR WELLS.Description Of Incident:
1999-06-24 00:00:00Date Reported:
1998-07-22 00:00:00Date Occurred:
20113Facility Id:
PIRF:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
target FP areas. TA 20113-19. 9/22/11
diss. levels. M-AA plans to restart AS/SVE for about 4 months to
biodegradation occurring in plumes despite localized FP and higher
nitrate/nitrite,Fe+2,ORP,pH, alk) sampled for 4/5/10 indicate
events(4/10-6/10). Nat.att parameters (DO,
FP was found in MW4,15,&30 (the max of 0.5 ft and SVE-76 in 3 gauging
4/10 mon event. (AS/SVE shutdwn since 4/09 as FP was ND & GW<GCLs).
monitoring will be required to confirm trend. 10/1/10 RMR Reporting
5/09 event ; dissolvd levels are now below GCLs and next 1-2 years of
requiring site check. 11/6/09 RMR 11/6/09 B decreased to max 3780 in
to observe contaminant levels at present. May need to send NOV
May be due to WL fluctuations and /or increased AS in area. Continue
release,. Will investigate by intensified monitoring in this area.
immediately dg of UST system in 2007-2008 may indicate a second
w/in 1500’ of source to the east and SE. 8/7/08 RMR Increase in cont
properly abandoned. 8 ws wells including 4 used for DW still exist
under the demolished Bennigans but not connected to it and was
not be found WW12 was properly abandoned. WS14 was found unexpectedly
receptor update report. WS11 and 13, presumed earlier to exist, could
NORTH HILLS EXXON SERVICES (Continued) U003414839
TC5817008.2s Page 22
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
east side of the facility was observed to have a significant release
present) the newly installed, sumpless diesel dispenser no. 12 on the
9/26/11 During PIB inspection by W. Bailey (with K.Harmon, CABComments:
Not reportedRP County:
Raleigh, NC 27609RP City,St,Zip:
P.O.Box 19107RP Address:
9198227755Telephone:
John M. Kane, Registered AgentContact Person:
NHMOO, L.L.C.Company:
RALRegion:
KAHRegional Officer Project Mgr:
Not reportedTestlat:
35.8392 -78.6426Lat/Long Decimal:
FalseValid:
NError Code:
0Error Flag:
FalseRPOP:
FalseRPOW:
0Reel Num:
0CD Num:
FalseRPL:
3PETOPT:
Not reportedRBCA GW:
File Located in HouseCurrent Status:
0Release Detection:
Not reportedLUR Filed:
NoFlag1:
NoFlag:
UnknownMTBE1:
NoMTBE:
Industrial/commercialLand Use:
Not reportedSite Risk Reason:
1Phase Of LSA Req:
Not reportedSite Priority:
Not reportedNORR Issue Date:
Not reportedNOV Issue Date:
Not reportedCorrective Action Plan Type:
LRisk Class Based On Review:
HRisk Classification:
COMMERCIALCommercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
0# Of Supply Wells:
RTank Regulated Status:
Not reportedLevel Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
05/15/2015Close Out:
Not reportedClosure Request:
09/26/2011Cleanup:
09/26/2011Date Occur:
09/26/2011Date Reported:
PProduct Type:
Leak-undergroundSource Type:
SLContamination Type:
39075Incident Number:
RA-6935UST Number:
00-0-000Facility ID:
RALEIGH, NC 27609City,State,Zip:
4359 SIX FORKS ROADAddress:
EXXON 4-0010 N HILLS DISP12Name:
NORTH HILLS EXXON SERVICES (Continued) U003414839
TC5817008.2s Page 23
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
0460801Tank Id:
-78.64184Longitude:
35.83866Latitude:
WakeFIPS County Desc:
BARTLESVILLE, OK 74004-0000Contact City/State/Zip:
Not reportedContact Address2:
686 ADAMS BLDG ATTN LARRY HARJOContact Address1:
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANYContact:
00-0-0000006193Facility Id:
RALEIGH, NC 27609City,State,Zip:
4359 SIX FORKS RD.Address:
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY #016687Name:
UST:
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Signed:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
2011-09-26 00:00:00NORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
Closed OutIncident Phase:
Not reportedLast Modified:
PUst Number:
CSource:
4Cause:
4Err Type:
Not reportedSource Code:
Not reportedRelease Code:
Not reportedPirf/Min Soil:
Not reported5 Minute Quad:
N7#5 Minute Quad:
Not reportedSamples Include:
NWells Affected Y/N:
Not reportedPriority Update:
Not reportedSite Priority:
1Location:
13Type:
6Operation Type:
4Ownership:
Not reportedOwner/Operator:
dispenser base.
above solenoid valve in dispenser and into soil under sumpless
At PIB inspection, diesel fuel was observed flowing from locationDescription Of Incident:
2011-09-26 00:00:00Date Reported:
2011-09-26 00:00:00Date Occurred:
39075Facility Id:
PIRF:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
shut dispenser down immediately. NORR for IAA sent 9/30/11
of diesel fuel from above the solenoid. Mike Barker, UST operator
NORTH HILLS EXXON SERVICES (Continued) U003414839
TC5817008.2s Page 24
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedLeak Detection Name:
Catchment BasinSpill Protection Name:
Auto Shutoff DeviceOverfill Protection Name:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
0Manifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
10000Tank Capacity:
Gasoline, Gas MixProduct Name:
Not reportedPerm Close Date:
01/01/1986Installed Date:
CurrentTank Status:
1ATank Id:
UnknownDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for TCONS_KEY:
UnknownLeak Detection Name:
UnknownSpill Protection Name:
UnknownOverfill Protection Name:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
Not reportedManifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
4000Tank Capacity:
Gasoline, Gas MixProduct Name:
10/30/1986Perm Close Date:
04/05/1976Installed Date:
RemovedTank Status:
1Tank Id:
UnknownDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for TCONS_KEY:
Not reportedLeak Detection Name:
UnknownSpill Protection Name:
UnknownOverfill Protection Name:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
YesRegulated:
NoCommercial:
Not reportedManifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
10000Tank Capacity:
Gasoline, Gas MixProduct Name:
Not reportedPerm Close Date:
04/04/1974Installed Date:
Temporarily ClosedTank Status:
NORTH HILLS EXXON SERVICES (Continued) U003414839
TC5817008.2s Page 25
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedManifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
3000Tank Capacity:
Gasoline, Gas MixProduct Name:
10/30/1986Perm Close Date:
04/05/1976Installed Date:
RemovedTank Status:
3Tank Id:
Pressurized SystemDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall FRPDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall FRPDecode for TCONS_KEY:
Not reportedLeak Detection Name:
Catchment BasinSpill Protection Name:
Auto Shutoff DeviceOverfill Protection Name:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
0Manifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
12000Tank Capacity:
Gasoline, Gas MixProduct Name:
Not reportedPerm Close Date:
01/01/1986Installed Date:
CurrentTank Status:
2ATank Id:
UnknownDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for TCONS_KEY:
UnknownLeak Detection Name:
UnknownSpill Protection Name:
UnknownOverfill Protection Name:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
Not reportedManifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
10000Tank Capacity:
Gasoline, Gas MixProduct Name:
10/30/1986Perm Close Date:
04/05/1976Installed Date:
RemovedTank Status:
2Tank Id:
Pressurized SystemDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall FRPDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall FRPDecode for TCONS_KEY:
NORTH HILLS EXXON SERVICES (Continued) U003414839
TC5817008.2s Page 26
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedPerm Close Date:
01/01/1988Installed Date:
CurrentTank Status:
4ATank Id:
UnknownDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for TCONS_KEY:
UnknownLeak Detection Name:
UnknownSpill Protection Name:
UnknownOverfill Protection Name:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
Not reportedManifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
3000Tank Capacity:
DieselProduct Name:
10/30/1986Perm Close Date:
04/05/1976Installed Date:
RemovedTank Status:
4Tank Id:
Pressurized SystemDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall FRPDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall FRPDecode for TCONS_KEY:
Not reportedLeak Detection Name:
Catchment BasinSpill Protection Name:
Auto Shutoff DeviceOverfill Protection Name:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
0Manifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
8000Tank Capacity:
Gasoline, Gas MixProduct Name:
Not reportedPerm Close Date:
01/01/1988Installed Date:
CurrentTank Status:
3ATank Id:
UnknownDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for TCONS_KEY:
UnknownLeak Detection Name:
UnknownSpill Protection Name:
UnknownOverfill Protection Name:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
NORTH HILLS EXXON SERVICES (Continued) U003414839
TC5817008.2s Page 27
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
No PipingDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall FRPDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall FRPDecode for TCONS_KEY:
Not reportedLeak Detection Name:
Catchment BasinSpill Protection Name:
25 Gal or Less TransferOverfill Protection Name:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
0Manifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
500Tank Capacity:
Oil, New/Used/MixProduct Name:
Not reportedPerm Close Date:
01/01/1988Installed Date:
CurrentTank Status:
5ATank Id:
UnknownDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall SteelDecode for TCONS_KEY:
UnknownLeak Detection Name:
UnknownSpill Protection Name:
UnknownOverfill Protection Name:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
Not reportedManifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
8000Tank Capacity:
Gasoline, Gas MixProduct Name:
10/30/1986Perm Close Date:
04/05/1978Installed Date:
RemovedTank Status:
5Tank Id:
Pressurized SystemDecode for PSYS_KEY:
Single Wall FRPDecode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall FRPDecode for TCONS_KEY:
Not reportedLeak Detection Name:
Catchment BasinSpill Protection Name:
Auto Shutoff DeviceOverfill Protection Name:
Not reportedOther CP Tank:
YesRegulated:
YesCommercial:
0Manifold Tank:
NoCompartment Tank:
NoMain Tank:
Not reportedRoot Tank Id:
10000Tank Capacity:
Fuel OilProduct Name:
NORTH HILLS EXXON SERVICES (Continued) U003414839
TC5817008.2s Page 28
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
04/30/2013Ended Date:
05/01/2012Started Date:
NHMOO, L.L.CFinancial Responsibility Name:
Self-InsuranceFinancial Responsibility Desc:
1Region:
00-0-0000005126Facility ID:
RALEIGH, NC 27609City,State,Zip:
4359 SIX FORKS ROADAddress:
NORTH HILLS EXXON SERVICESName:
NC Financial Assurance 1:
NORTH HILLS EXXON SERVICES (Continued) U003414839
2012 EXXON 4-0010 N HILLS DISP12 4359 SIX FORKS ROAD
RGA LUST:
489 ft. Site 6 of 11 in cluster B
0.093 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
386 ft.

< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC
NE 4359 SIX FORKS ROAD N/A
B14 RGA LUSTEXXON 4-0010 N HILLS DISP12 S115617132
2004 EXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS 4359 SIX FORKS RD
2005 EXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS 4359 SIX FORKS RD
RGA LUST:
489 ft. Site 7 of 11 in cluster B
0.093 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
386 ft.

< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC
NE 4359 SIX FORKS RD N/A
B15 RGA LUSTEXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS S115617133
2003 EXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS 4359 SIX FORKS ROAD
2006 EXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS 4359 SIX FORKS ROAD
2007 EXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS 4359 SIX FORKS ROAD
2008 EXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS 4359 SIX FORKS ROAD
2009 EXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS 4359 SIX FORKS ROAD
2010 EXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS 4359 SIX FORKS ROAD
2011 EXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS 4359 SIX FORKS ROAD
2012 EXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS 4359 SIX FORKS ROAD
RGA LUST:
489 ft. Site 8 of 11 in cluster B
0.093 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
386 ft.

< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC
NE 4359 SIX FORKS ROAD N/A
B16 RGA LUSTEXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS S115617134
TC5817008.2s Page 29
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
IRisk Site:
UrbanSetting:
FacilityLocation:
Gasoline/dieselType:
Leak-undergroundSource:
Not reportedQty Recovered 1:
Not reportedQty Lost 1:
GASOLINEMaterial:
CommercialOperation:
PrivateOwnership:
RALEIGH, NC 27609-Oper City,St,Zip:
RALEIGHOperator City:
4359 SIX FORKS ROADOperator Address:
PAYNE SERVICES, INC.Owner Company:
Not reportedContact Phone:
PHIL PAYNEOperator:
THERE IS FREE PRODUCT IN 3 MONITOR WELLS.Incident Desc:
NoSoil Contam:
Yes, Groundwater Contamination has been detectedGW Contam:
6/24/1999Submit Date:
4/17/1998Date Occurred:
20113Facility ID:
RALRegion:
IMD:
760571.10011Y Coord:
2105917.6839X Coord:
Not reportedPlat Date:
Not reportedPlat:
Recorded 3-10-2015Deed Date:
Not reportedDeed:
Notice and RestrictionInstrument:
Not reportedPlat PG:
Not reportedPlat BK:
Not reportedDeed PG:
Not reportedDeed BK:
EffectiveInstrument Status:
Not reportedPlant Reception Date:
NoneCertification:
Media Restrictions OnlyAllowed Use:
Multi-MediaRestricted Media:
3/10/2015Received Date:
UST SystemContamination Source:
Multi COCCOC:
No Further ActionProject Status:
Underground Storage Tank SectionDWM Program:
Raleigh Regional Office [phone]DWM Contact:
2914Object ID:
RA-2968Project Number:
RALEIGH, NCCity,State,Zip:
4359 SIX FORKS ROADAddress:
EXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLSName:
INST CONTROL:
489 ft. Site 9 of 11 in cluster B
0.093 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
386 ft.

< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC
NE IMD4359 SIX FORKS ROAD N/A
B17 INST CONTROLEXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS S103916803
TC5817008.2s Page 30
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Sighned:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
REIncident Phase:
Not reportedLast Modified:
20113Facility ID:
DWMAgency:
7GPS:
78.6425Longitude Decimal:
35.8391666666667Latitude Decimal:
783833Longitude Number:
355021Latitude Number:
-78.6425Longitude:
35.83916666Latitude:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
Not reported7.5 Min Quad:
Groundwater SamplesSamples Include:
Responsible PartiesSampled By:
Not reportedWells Contam:
Not reportedNum Affected:
NoWells Affected:
KAHDem Contact:
6/24/1999Priority Update:
IPriority Code:
60ISite Priority:
EXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS (Continued) S103916803
Gasoline Service Stations1986 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations1985 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations1983 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations1982 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations1980 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations1979 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations1978 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations1977 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations1976 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations1975 PAYNE SERVICE INC
Gasoline Service Stations1974 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations1973 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations1972 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations1971 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations1970 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Type:Year: Name:
EDR Hist Auto
489 ft. Site 10 of 11 in cluster B
0.093 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
386 ft.

< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC 27601
NE 4359 SIX FORKS RD N/A
B18 EDR Hist AutoPAYNE SERVICES INC 1020833965
TC5817008.2s Page 31
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
General Automotive Repair Shops2014 NORTH HILLS EXXON SERVICE
General Automotive Repair Shops2013 NORTH HILLS EXXON SERVICE
General Automotive Repair Shops2012 NORTH HILLS EXXON SERVICE
General Automotive Repair Shops2011 NORTH HILLS EXXON SERVICE
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2010 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2009 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2008 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2007 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2006 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2005 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2004 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2003 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2002 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2001 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2000 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC1999 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC1998 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC1997 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC1996 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC1995 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC1994 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC1993 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC1992 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC1991 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC1990 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations, NEC1989 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations1988 PAYNE SERVICES INC
Gasoline Service Stations1987 PAYNE SERVICES INC
PAYNE SERVICES INC (Continued)1020833965
other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any
waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or
month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous
or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar
month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time;
Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendarDescription:
Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorClassification:
PrivateLand type:
04EPA Region:
Not reportedContact email:
919-787-2432Contact telephone:
USContact country:
RALEIGH, NC 27609
4359 SIX FORKS RDContact address:
PHIL PAYNEContact:
RALEIGH, NC 27609
SIX FORKS RDMailing address:
NCD986191757EPA ID:
RALEIGH, NC 27609
4359 SIX FORKS RDFacility address:
NORTH HILLS EXXONFacility name:
10/27/1995Date form received by agency:
RCRA-VSQG:
489 ft. Site 11 of 11 in cluster B
0.093 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
386 ft.

< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC 27609
NE LUST TRUST4359 SIX FORKS RD NCD986191757
B19 RCRA-VSQGNORTH HILLS EXXON 1000535846
TC5817008.2s Page 32
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reported Enf. disp. status date:
Not reported Enf. disposition status:
10/19/1995 Enforcement action date:
WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action:
StateViolation lead agency:
11/06/1995Date achieved compliance:
10/19/1995Date violation determined:
Generators - GeneralArea of violation:
SR - 262.41Regulation violated:
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name:
D001. Waste code:
Hazardous Waste Summary:
NoUsed oil transporter:
NoUsed oil transfer facility:
NoUsed oil Specification marketer:
NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner:
NoUser oil refiner:
NoUsed oil processor:
NoUsed oil fuel burner:
NoFurnace exemption:
NoOn-site burner exemption:
NoUnderground injection activity:
NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW:
NoTransporter of hazardous waste:
NoRecycler of hazardous waste:
NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive):
NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste:
Handler Activities Summary:
Not reportedOwner/Op end date:
Not reportedOwner/Op start date:
OwnerOwner/Operator Type:
PrivateLegal status:
Not reportedOwner/operator extension:
Not reportedOwner/operator fax:
Not reportedOwner/operator email:
919-787-2432Owner/operator telephone:
Not reportedOwner/operator country:
RALEIGH, NC 27609
4359 SIX FORKS ROADOwner/operator address:
JAMES W PAYNEOwner/operator name:
Owner/Operator Summary:
hazardous waste
the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely
any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from
time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of
hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any
from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely
of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting
land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less
NORTH HILLS EXXON (Continued)1000535846
TC5817008.2s Page 33
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
0Sum 3rd Party Amt Applied:
1000003rd Party Deductable Amt:
20000Deductable Amount:
Not reportedPriority Rank:
100% CommercialCommercial Find:
TrueSite Eligible?:
other claims! 2/27/13
2/20/02. Site owes us money, please see Leann before processing any
SITE IS NEARING 1.5 MIL LIMIT.Eligibility transferred to NHMOO, LLCSite Note:
20113Site ID:
0-005126Facility ID:
LUST TRUST:
StateEvaluation lead agency:
11/06/1995Date achieved compliance:
Generators - GeneralArea of violation:
FOCUSED COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONEvaluation:
10/19/1995Evaluation date:
StateEvaluation lead agency:
11/06/1995Date achieved compliance:
Generators - GeneralArea of violation:
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE EVALUATIONEvaluation:
11/06/1995Evaluation date:
Evaluation Action Summary:
Not reported Paid penalty amount:
Not reported Final penalty amount:
Not reported Proposed penalty amount:
State Enforcement lead agency:
NORTH HILLS EXXON (Continued)1000535846
residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the
during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any
calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste
Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription:
Large Quantity GeneratorClassification:
PrivateLand type:
04EPA Region:
[e-mail] email:
800-587-2228Contact telephone:
USContact country:
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440
PO BOX 111Contact address:
STEVE MUSSERContact:
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440
PO BOX 111Mailing address:
NCR000140038EPA ID:
RALEIGH, NC 27609-5712
4191 THE CIRCLE AT NORTH HILLS STFacility address:
TARGET STORE T1892Facility name:
03/01/2018Date form received by agency:
RCRA-LQG:
525 ft.
0.099 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
365 ft.

< 1/8 RALEIGH, NC 27609
ESE 4191 THE CIRCLE AT NORTH HILLS ST NCR000140038
20 RCRA-LQGTARGET STORE T1892 1009399500
TC5817008.2s Page 34
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
TARGET STORE T1892Site name:
01/29/2016Date form received by agency:
Historical Generators:
NoUsed oil transporter:
NoUsed oil transfer facility:
NoUsed oil Specification marketer:
NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner:
NoUser oil refiner:
NoUsed oil processor:
NoUsed oil fuel burner:
NoFurnace exemption:
NoOn-site burner exemption:
NoUnderground injection activity:
NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW:
NoTransporter of hazardous waste:
NoRecycler of hazardous waste:
NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive):
NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste:
Handler Activities Summary:
Not reportedOwner/Op end date:
10/06/2004Owner/Op start date:
OperatorOwner/Operator Type:
PrivateLegal status:
Not reportedOwner/operator extension:
Not reportedOwner/operator fax:
Not reportedOwner/operator email:
800-587-2228Owner/operator telephone:
Not reportedOwner/operator country:
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440
PO BOX 111Owner/operator address:
TARGET CORPORATIONOwner/operator name:
Not reportedOwner/Op end date:
10/06/2004Owner/Op start date:
OwnerOwner/Operator Type:
PrivateLegal status:
Not reportedOwner/operator extension:
Not reportedOwner/operator fax:
Not reportedOwner/operator email:
800-587-2228Owner/operator telephone:
Not reportedOwner/operator country:
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440
PO BOX 111Owner/operator address:
TARGET CORPORATIONOwner/operator name:
Owner/Operator Summary:
100 kg of that material at any time
hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than
from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely
of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting
kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less
hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1
waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely
cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous
TARGET STORE T1892 (Continued)1009399500
TC5817008.2s Page 35
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
D018. Waste code:
2,4-D (2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID). Waste name:
D016. Waste code:
SILVER. Waste name:
D011. Waste code:
SELENIUM. Waste name:
D010. Waste code:
MERCURY. Waste name:
D009. Waste code:
LEAD. Waste name:
D008. Waste code:
CHROMIUM. Waste name:
D007. Waste code:
CADMIUM. Waste name:
D006. Waste code:
BARIUM. Waste name:
D005. Waste code:
ARSENIC. Waste name:
D004. Waste code:
REACTIVE WASTE. Waste name:
D003. Waste code:
CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name:
D002. Waste code:
IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name:
D001. Waste code:
Hazardous Waste Summary:
Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorClassification:
TARGET STORE #1892Site name:
01/27/2006Date form received by agency:
Large Quantity GeneratorClassification:
TARGET STORE #1892Site name:
09/13/2011Date form received by agency:
Large Quantity GeneratorClassification:
TARGET STORE #T1892Site name:
02/15/2012Date form received by agency:
Large Quantity GeneratorClassification:
TARGET STORE T1892Site name:
02/12/2014Date form received by agency:
Large Quantity GeneratorClassification:
TARGET STORE T1892 (Continued)1009399500
TC5817008.2s Page 36
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
U122. Waste code:
BENZENE, 1,4-DICHLORO- (OR) P-DICHLOROBENZENE. Waste name:
U072. Waste code:
2-OXIDE (OR) CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE
2H-1,3,2-OXAZAPHOSPHORIN-2-AMINE, N,N-BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)TETRAHYDRO-,. Waste name:
U058. Waste code:
CHLOROFORM (OR) METHANE, TRICHLORO-. Waste name:
U044. Waste code:
BENZENEBUTANOIC ACID, 4-[BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)AMINO]- (OR) CHLORAMBUCIL. Waste name:
U035. Waste code:
ACETALDEHYDE, TRICHLORO- (OR) CHLORAL. Waste name:
U034. Waste code:
2-PROPANONE (I) (OR) ACETONE (I). Waste name:
U002. Waste code:
1,2,3-PROPANETRIOL, TRINITRATE (R) (OR) NITROGLYCERINE (R). Waste name:
P081. Waste code:
SALTS
NICOTINE, & SALTS (OR) PYRIDINE, 3-(1-METHYL-2-PYRROLIDINYL)-,(S)-, &. Waste name:
P075. Waste code:
ALPHA-DIMETHYL-
ALPHA,ALPHA-DIMETHYLPHENETHYLAMINE (OR) BENZENEETHANAMINE, ALPHA,. Waste name:
P046. Waste code:
EPINEPHRINE
1,2-BENZENEDIOL, 4-[1-HYDROXY-2-(METHYLAMINO)ETHYL]-, (R)- (OR). Waste name:
P042. Waste code:
1-ACETYL-2-THIOUREA (OR) ACETAMIDE, N-(AMINOTHIOXOMETHYL)-. Waste name:
P002. Waste code:
SALTS, WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3%
WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% (OR) WARFARIN, &
2H-1-BENZOPYRAN-2-ONE, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3-OXO-1-PHENYLBUTYL)-, & SALTS,. Waste name:
P001. Waste code:
METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name:
D035. Waste code:
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE. Waste name:
D028. Waste code:
CRESOL. Waste name:
D026. Waste code:
M-CRESOL. Waste name:
D024. Waste code:
BENZENE. Waste name:
TARGET STORE T1892 (Continued)1009399500
TC5817008.2s Page 37
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
185Amount (Lbs):
BARIUMWaste name:
D005Waste code:
21Amount (Lbs):
ARSENICWaste name:
D004Waste code:
575Amount (Lbs):
DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE.
THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE
USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN
OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS
CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN
CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A
A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 ISWaste name:
D002Waste code:
656Amount (Lbs):
WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE.
MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT
WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE
FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET,
CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE
LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS
IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name:
D001Waste code:
Annual Waste Handled:
Last Biennial Reporting Year: 2017
Biennial Reports:
CARBARYL (OR) 1-NAPHTHALENOL, METHYLCARBAMATE. Waste name:
U279. Waste code:
1,3-BENZENEDIOL (OR) RESORCINOL. Waste name:
U201. Waste code:
(3BETA, 16BETA, 17ALPHA, 18BETA, 20ALPHA)-
11,17-DIMETHOXY-18-[(3,4,5-TRIMETHOXYBENZOYL)OXY]-, METHYL ESTER,
RESERPINE (OR) YOHIMBAN-16-CARBOXYLIC ACID,. Waste name:
U200. Waste code:
PHENOL. Waste name:
U188. Waste code:
METHANOL (I) (OR) METHYL ALCOHOL (I). Waste name:
U154. Waste code:
L-PHENYLALANINE, 4-[BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)AMINO]- (OR) MELPHALAN. Waste name:
U150. Waste code:
5ALPHA, 6BETA)- (OR) LINDANE
CYCLOHEXANE, 1,2,3,4,5,6-HEXACHLORO-, (1ALPHA, 2ALPHA, 3BETA, 4ALPHA,. Waste name:
U129. Waste code:
FORMALDEHYDE. Waste name:
TARGET STORE T1892 (Continued)1009399500
TC5817008.2s Page 38
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
129Amount (Lbs):
ACETONE (I)Waste name:
U002Waste code:
14Amount (Lbs):
NICOTINE, & SALTSWaste name:
P075Waste code:
14Amount (Lbs):
WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3%
2H-1-BENZOPYRAN-2-ONE, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3-OXO-1-PHENYLBUTYL)-, & SALTS,Waste name:
P001Waste code:
586Amount (Lbs):
METHYL ETHYL KETONEWaste name:
D035Waste code:
21Amount (Lbs):
CRESOLWaste name:
D026Waste code:
21Amount (Lbs):
M-CRESOLWaste name:
D024Waste code:
129Amount (Lbs):
BENZENEWaste name:
D018Waste code:
21Amount (Lbs):
2,4-DWaste name:
D016Waste code:
150Amount (Lbs):
SILVERWaste name:
D011Waste code:
21Amount (Lbs):
SELENIUMWaste name:
D010Waste code:
61Amount (Lbs):
MERCURYWaste name:
D009Waste code:
202Amount (Lbs):
LEADWaste name:
D008Waste code:
185Amount (Lbs):
CHROMIUMWaste name:
D007Waste code:
37Amount (Lbs):
CADMIUMWaste name:
D006Waste code:
TARGET STORE T1892 (Continued)1009399500
TC5817008.2s Page 39
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
StateEvaluation lead agency:
Not reportedDate achieved compliance:
Not reportedArea of violation:
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation:
02/09/2011Evaluation date:
StateEvaluation lead agency:
Not reportedDate achieved compliance:
Not reportedArea of violation:
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation:
05/31/2012Evaluation date:
StateEvaluation lead agency:
Not reportedDate achieved compliance:
Not reportedArea of violation:
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation:
11/10/2015Evaluation date:
StateEvaluation lead agency:
Not reportedDate achieved compliance:
Not reportedArea of violation:
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation:
12/07/2017Evaluation date:
Evaluation Action Summary:
No violations foundViolation Status:
129Amount (Lbs):
METHANOL (I)Waste name:
U154Waste code:
21Amount (Lbs):
BENZENEBUTANOIC ACID, 4-[BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)AMINO]-Waste name:
U035Waste code:
TARGET STORE T1892 (Continued)1009399500
PrivateLand type:
04EPA Region:
Not reportedContact email:
919-787-1125Contact telephone:
USContact country:
RALEIGH, NC 27609
4421 SIX FORKS RDContact address:
GREG PAPPASContact:
RALEIGH, NC 27612
PLEASANT VALLEY RDMailing address:
NCD981856503EPA ID:
RALEIGH, NC 27609
4421 SIX FORKS RDFacility address:
NORTH HILL CLEANERSFacility name:
12/15/1998Date form received by agency:
RCRA NonGen / NLR:
745 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster D
0.141 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
396 ft.

1/8-1/4 RALEIGH, NC 27609
NNE 4421 SIX FORKS RD NCD981856503
D21 RCRA NonGen / NLRNORTH HILL CLEANERS 1000405975
TC5817008.2s Page 40
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reported Paid penalty amount:
Not reported Final penalty amount:
Not reported Proposed penalty amount:
State Enforcement lead agency:
Not reported Enf. disp. status date:
Not reported Enf. disposition status:
11/23/1994 Enforcement action date:
WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action:
StateViolation lead agency:
12/08/1994Date achieved compliance:
11/23/1994Date violation determined:
Generators - GeneralArea of violation:
SR - 130A-294-1Regulation violated:
Facility Has Received Notices of Violations:
IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name:
D001. Waste code:
Hazardous Waste Summary:
NoUsed oil transporter:
NoUsed oil transfer facility:
NoUsed oil Specification marketer:
NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner:
NoUser oil refiner:
NoUsed oil processor:
NoUsed oil fuel burner:
NoFurnace exemption:
NoOn-site burner exemption:
NoUnderground injection activity:
NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW:
NoTransporter of hazardous waste:
NoRecycler of hazardous waste:
NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive):
NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste:
Handler Activities Summary:
Not reportedOwner/Op end date:
Not reportedOwner/Op start date:
OwnerOwner/Operator Type:
PrivateLegal status:
Not reportedOwner/operator extension:
Not reportedOwner/operator fax:
Not reportedOwner/operator email:
919-787-1125Owner/operator telephone:
Not reportedOwner/operator country:
RALEIGH, NC 27609
4421 SIX FORKS RDOwner/operator address:
TOM HILKEROwner/operator name:
Owner/Operator Summary:
Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription:
Non-GeneratorClassification:
NORTH HILL CLEANERS (Continued) 1000405975
TC5817008.2s Page 41
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
StateEvaluation lead agency:
Not reportedDate achieved compliance:
Not reportedArea of violation:
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation:
04/20/1994Evaluation date:
StateEvaluation lead agency:
12/08/1994Date achieved compliance:
Generators - GeneralArea of violation:
FOLLOW-UP INSPECTIONEvaluation:
11/23/1994Evaluation date:
StateEvaluation lead agency:
Not reportedDate achieved compliance:
Not reportedArea of violation:
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE EVALUATIONEvaluation:
12/08/1994Evaluation date:
Evaluation Action Summary:
NORTH HILL CLEANERS (Continued) 1000405975
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC2003 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC2002 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC2001 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC2000 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC1999 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC1998 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC1997 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Type:Year: Name:
EDR Hist Cleaner
745 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster D
0.141 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
396 ft.

1/8-1/4 RALEIGH, NC 27609
NNE 4421 SIX FORKS RD N/A
D22 EDR Hist CleanerNORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY 1018925685
1995 FIRST UNION BANK 4300 SIX FORKS RD.
1996 FIRST UNION BANK 4300 SIX FORKS RD.
1997 FIRST UNION BANK 4300 SIX FORKS RD.
2000 FIRST UNION BANK 4300 SIX FORKS RD.
2001 FIRST UNION BANK 4300 SIX FORKS RD.
2002 FIRST UNION BANK 4300 SIX FORKS RD.
RGA LUST:
775 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster E
0.147 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
381 ft.

1/8-1/4 RALEIGH, NC
NE 4300 SIX FORKS RD. N/A
E23 RGA LUSTFIRST UNION BANK S115618362
TC5817008.2s Page 42
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
201 NORTH TRYON ST., 20TH FLR.RP Address:
Not reportedTelephone:
CHIP MILLERContact Person:
WACHOVIA CORPORATE REAL ESTATECompany:
RALRegion:
WDPRegional Officer Project Mgr:
Not reportedTestlat:
35.8392 -78.6415Lat/Long Decimal:
FalseValid:
NError Code:
0Error Flag:
FalseRPOP:
FalseRPOW:
30Reel Num:
262CD Num:
FalseRPL:
3PETOPT:
Cleanups to 2L.0202 standardsRBCA GW:
File Located in ArchivesCurrent Status:
0Release Detection:
Not reportedLUR Filed:
NoFlag1:
NoFlag:
NoMTBE1:
NoMTBE:
ResidentialLand Use:
Not reportedSite Risk Reason:
Not reportedPhase Of LSA Req:
15ESite Priority:
Not reportedNORR Issue Date:
Not reportedNOV Issue Date:
excavationCorrective Action Plan Type:
LRisk Class Based On Review:
LRisk Classification:
COMMERCIALCommercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
0# Of Supply Wells:
RTank Regulated Status:
Soil to GroundwaterLevel Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
08/11/2004Close Out:
Not reportedClosure Request:
03/28/1994Cleanup:
01/31/1994Date Occur:
03/28/1994Date Reported:
PProduct Type:
Leak-undergroundSource Type:
SLContamination Type:
14548Incident Number:
RA-2270UST Number:
Not reportedFacility ID:
RALEIGH, NC 27609-City,State,Zip:
4300 SIX FORKS RDAddress:
FIRST UNION BANK(BTI BLDG)Name:
LUST:
775 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster E
0.147 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
381 ft.

1/8-1/4 IMDRALEIGH, NC 27609
NE LUST TRUST4300 SIX FORKS RD N/A
E24 LUSTFIRST UNION BANK(BTI BLDG)S101643350
TC5817008.2s Page 43
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
0Sum 3rd Party Amt Applied:
03rd Party Deductable Amt:
0Deductable Amount:
LowPriority Rank:
100% Non-CommercialCommercial Find:
TrueSite Eligible?:
Not reportedSite Note:
14548Site ID:
Not reportedFacility ID:
LUST TRUST:
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Signed:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
Closed OutIncident Phase:
2004-08-11 00:00:00Last Modified:
Not reportedUst Number:
Not reportedSource:
Not reportedCause:
Not reportedErr Type:
PirfSource Code:
J39XRelease Code:
Not reportedPirf/Min Soil:
25 Minute Quad:
37#5 Minute Quad:
0Samples Include:
Not reportedWells Affected Y/N:
1998-04-16 00:00:00Priority Update:
15ESite Priority:
1Location:
3Type:
6Operation Type:
4Ownership:
ROBERT PENNINGTONOwner/Operator:
RELEASE FOUND DURING REMOVAL OF 550 GAL. DIESEL GENERATOR TANK.Description Of Incident:
1995-09-01 00:00:00Date Reported:
1995-01-31 00:00:00Date Occurred:
14548Facility Id:
PIRF:
Not reported5 Min Quad:
indicated contamination below pit and in sidewal
was excavated to depth of 14’ bls and soil confirmatory samples
diesel 550 gal UST (used for emergency generator) was removed. Soil
First Union Bank (BTI Bldg.), inc.no. 14548 Chronology: 1/31/94 A aComments:
Not reportedRP County:
CHARLOTTE, NC 28288-0340RP City,St,Zip:
FIRST UNION BANK(BTI BLDG) (Continued) S101643350
TC5817008.2s Page 44
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedClose-out Report:
Not reportedClosure Request Date:
Not reportedRS Designation:
Not reportedReclassification Report:
Not reportedSOC Sighned:
Not reportedCorrective Action Planned:
Not reportedPublic Meeting Held:
Not reported45 Day Report:
Not reportedNORR Issued:
Not reportedNOV Issued:
Closed OutIncident Phase:
Not reportedLast Modified:
14548Facility ID:
DWMAgency:
NODGPS:
78.6411111111111Longitude Decimal:
35.8380555555556Latitude Decimal:
783828Longitude Number:
355017Latitude Number:
-78.64111111Longitude:
35.83805555Latitude:
J39X5 Min Quad:
Not reported7.5 Min Quad:
Soil SamplesSamples Include:
Responsible PartiesSampled By:
Not reportedWells Contam:
0Num Affected:
Not reportedWells Affected:
WDPDem Contact:
4/16/1998Priority Update:
LPriority Code:
15ESite Priority:
LRisk Site:
IndustrialSetting:
FacilityLocation:
Gasoline/dieselType:
Leak-undergroundSource:
Not reportedQty Recovered 1:
Not reportedQty Lost 1:
Not reportedMaterial:
CommercialOperation:
PrivateOwnership:
CHARLOTTE, NC 28288-0340Oper City,St,Zip:
CHARLOTTEOperator City:
201 NORTH TRYON ST., 20TH FLR.Operator Address:
WACHOVIA CORPORATE REAL ESTATEOwner Company:
Not reportedContact Phone:
CHIP MILLEROperator:
RELEASE FOUND DURING REMOVAL OF 550 GAL. DIESEL GENERATOR TANK.Incident Desc:
YesSoil Contam:
No Groundwater Contamination detectedGW Contam:
9/1/1995Submit Date:
1/31/1994Date Occurred:
14548Facility ID:
RALRegion:
IMD:
FIRST UNION BANK(BTI BLDG) (Continued) S101643350
TC5817008.2s Page 45
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
2004 FIRST UNION BANK(BTI BLDG) 4300 SIX FORKS RD
2005 FIRST UNION BANK(BTI BLDG) 4300 SIX FORKS RD
2006 FIRST UNION BANK(BTI BLDG) 4300 SIX FORKS RD
2007 FIRST UNION BANK(BTI BLDG) 4300 SIX FORKS RD
2008 FIRST UNION BANK(BTI BLDG) 4300 SIX FORKS RD
2009 FIRST UNION BANK(BTI BLDG) 4300 SIX FORKS RD
2010 FIRST UNION BANK(BTI BLDG) 4300 SIX FORKS RD
2011 FIRST UNION BANK(BTI BLDG) 4300 SIX FORKS RD
2012 FIRST UNION BANK(BTI BLDG) 4300 SIX FORKS RD
RGA LUST:
775 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster E
0.147 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
381 ft.

1/8-1/4 RALEIGH, NC
NE 4300 SIX FORKS RD N/A
E25 RGA LUSTFIRST UNION BANK(BTI BLDG)S115618357
2003 FIRST UNION BANK(BTI BLDG) 4300 SIX FORKS ROAD
RGA LUST:
775 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster E
0.147 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
381 ft.

1/8-1/4 RALEIGH, NC
NE 4300 SIX FORKS ROAD N/A
E26 RGA LUSTFIRST UNION BANK(BTI BLDG)S115618358
- Eastern North Carolina ;Company Service Area:
- Broker;- Automotive;Company Type:
27609Mailing Zip:
NCMailing State:
RaleighMailing City:
4208 Six Forks Road Suite 1000Mailing Address:
RALEIGH, NC 27609City,State,Zip:
4208 SIX FORKS ROAD SUITE 1000Address:
WHEELS FOR WISHESName:
SWRCY:
821 ft.
0.155 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
360 ft.

1/8-1/4 RALEIGH, NC 27609
East 4208 SIX FORKS ROAD SUITE 1000 N/A
27 SWRCYWHEELS FOR WISHES S114040104
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC2007 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC2006 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC2005 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC2004 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Type:Year: Name:
EDR Hist Cleaner
852 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster D
0.161 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
397 ft.

1/8-1/4 RALEIGH, NC 27609
NNE 4441 SIX FORKS RD N/A
D28 EDR Hist CleanerNORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY 1018595547
TC5817008.2s Page 46
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC2014 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC2013 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC2012 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC2011 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC2010 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC2009 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs, NEC2008 NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY
NORTH HILLS CLEANERS & LAUNDRY (Continued) 1018595547
2000 KIRKHART RESIDENCE (KEVIN) 604 MACON PLACE
2001 KIRKHART RESIDENCE (KEVIN) 604 MACON PLACE
2002 KIRKHART RESIDENCE (KEVIN) 604 MACON PLACE
2003 KIRKHART RESIDENCE (KEVIN) 604 MACON PLACE
2004 KIRKHART RESIDENCE (KEVIN) 604 MACON PLACE
2005 KIRKHART RESIDENCE (KEVIN) 604 MACON PLACE
2006 KIRKHART RESIDENCE (KEVIN) 604 MACON PLACE
2007 KIRKHART RESIDENCE (KEVIN) 604 MACON PLACE
2008 KIRKHART RESIDENCE (KEVIN) 604 MACON PLACE
2009 KIRKHART RESIDENCE (KEVIN) 604 MACON PLACE
2010 KIRKHART RESIDENCE (KEVIN) 604 MACON PLACE
2011 KIRKHART RESIDENCE (KEVIN) 604 MACON PLACE
2012 KIRKHART RESIDENCE (KEVIN) 604 MACON PLACE
RGA LUST:
1314 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster F
0.249 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
369 ft.

1/8-1/4 RALEIGH, NC
NW 604 MACON PLACE N/A
F29 RGA LUSTKIRKHART RESIDENCE (KEVIN)S115626956
2000 KIRKHART KEVIN RESIDENCE 604 MACON PLACE
2001 KIRKHART KEVIN RESIDENCE 604 MACON PLACE
2002 KIRKHART KEVIN RESIDENCE 604 MACON PLACE
RGA LUST:
1314 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster F
0.249 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
369 ft.

1/8-1/4 RALEIGH, NC
NW 604 MACON PLACE N/A
F30 RGA LUSTKIRKHART KEVIN RESIDENCE S115626955
2003 KIRKHART, KEVIN - RESIDENCE 604 MACON PLACE
RGA LUST:
1314 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster F
0.249 mi.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
369 ft.

1/8-1/4 RALEIGH, NC
NW 604 MACON PLACE N/A
F31 RGA LUSTKIRKHART, KEVIN - RESIDENCE S115626957
TC5817008.2s Page 47
ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 2 records.RALEIGH S123800974CHESTNUT HILLS GULF SERVICE5265 & 5275 SIX FORKS ROAD27609LUSTRALEIGH 1012118526NORTH HILLS SHOPPING CENTERNE QUAD OF SIX FORKS ROAD AND27609FINDSTC5817008.2s Page 81
TC5817008.2s Page A-1
geologic strata.
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
2013Version Date:
5948668 RALEIGH EAST, NCEast Map:
2013Version Date:
5948670 RALEIGH WEST, NCTarget Property Map:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
366 ft. above sea levelElevation:
3968232.0UTM Y (Meters):
712781.8UTM X (Meters):
Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator:
78.644211 - 78˚ 38’ 39.16’’Longitude (West):
35.837004 - 35˚ 50’ 13.21’’Latitude (North):
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
RALEIGH, NC 27609
4217 SIX FORKS ROAD
NORTH HILLS NHX REDEVELOPMENT
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM®
TC5817008.2s Page A-2
should be field verified.
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 366 ft.
North South
West East202205248280256280282315354366380395402411417429436441436226249263260255314344360383366373368341332288280284266230General SouthGeneral Topographic Gradient:
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC5817008.2s Page A-3
For additional site information, refer to Physical Setting Source Map Findings.
Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile SSW1G
Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile SSW1
GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION
GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapRALEIGH WEST
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property
FEMA FIRM Flood data3720171500J
FEMA FIRM Flood data3720171600J
FEMA FIRM Flood data3720170600J
Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data3720170500J
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
and bodies of water).
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC5817008.2s Page A-4

> 10 inchesDepth to Bedrock Max:
> 10 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil.
Not reportedSoil Drainage Class:
Not reportedHydrologic Group:
variableSoil Surface Texture:
URBAN LAND Soil Component Name:
The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data.
in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Metamorphic RocksCategory:PaleozoicEra:
PennsylvanianSystem:
Felsic paragneiss and schistSeries:
mm1Code: (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC5817008.2s Page A-5
No Wells Found
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
1.000State Database
Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS
1.000Federal USGS
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
sandy loamDeeper Soil Types:
sandy clay
clay
clay loamShallow Soil Types:
loam
fine sandy loam
sandy loamSurficial Soil Types:
loam
fine sandy loam
sandy loamSoil Surface Textures:
appear within the general area of target property.
Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may
OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA
Min: 0.00
Max: 0.00
Min: 0.00
Max: 0.00Not reportedNot reportedvariable 6 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Permeability
Rate (in/hr)
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC5817008.2s Page A-6
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
No Wells Found
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
No PWS System Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
2 80
440320320400360
440
2 80320320320400400 400400400
320
32 0
3202402 80
360
360
3 60
3 6 0
3 6 0
360 36036036 0 3602 4
0
2 40
3 20360320
320
3 2 0
320
3 20320320
320
320320 3202 80280280280 280280280
280 2 8 0
28 0
280280280
2 8 028
0280
200240
240200
2 0 0
200 200200402
4
0
2
4024024 0 240240
240 24024 0240 240240
2402 402402402402402402802
80
2
8
0 2802 802 80
2803203203 2 0320320
36036 0 36028024 0
2802 802
80280 280
280
3 203203
280
240NC
TC5817008.2s Page A-8
Date: 04/11/1996
Depth to rock - average: Not Reported
Depth to rock - deepest: Not Reported
Depth to rock - shallowest: Not Reported
Average Water Table Depth: 43.0
Deepest Water Table Depth: Not Reported
Shallowest Water Table Depth: Not Reported
Groundwater Flow: Not Reported
Site ID: 153461G
SSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
40622AQUIFLOW
Date: 04/11/1996
Depth to rock - average: Not Reported
Depth to rock - deepest: Not Reported
Depth to rock - shallowest: Not Reported
Average Water Table Depth: 43.0
Deepest Water Table Depth: Not Reported
Shallowest Water Table Depth: Not Reported
Groundwater Flow: Not Reported
Site ID: 153461
SSW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
40622AQUIFLOW
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC5817008.2s Page A-9
NC50008978Edr id:
162924Gisid:EEostat:
MPrecision1:AElclass:
NC50008978NC_NHEO
Map ID
DirectionDistance EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC5817008.2s Page A-10
0%33%67%2.967 pCi/LBasement
Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor
0%33%67%3.300 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor
% >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea
Number of sites tested: 3
Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 27609
: Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
: Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Federal EPA Radon Zone for WAKE County: 2
38.40.610.799
9.40.53.0564
__________________________________
Max pCi/LMin pCi/LAvg pCi/LNum Results
Radon Test Results
State Database: NC Radon
AREA RADON INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
®
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOW Information SystemR
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC5817008.2s Page PSGR-1
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic) that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site’s significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or high quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC5817008.2s Page PSGR-2
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC5817008.2s Page PSGR-3
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED

Subject Property
Laboratory staff from The City of Raleigh’s Water Treatment Division perform an exceptional level of testing
to ensure your drinking water is safe. The drinking water laboratories are certified and approved by the
State of North Carolina and the USEPA to perform water quality analysis. In 2018, staff chemists,
microbiologist and technicians at the drinking water laboratory collected, tested and analyzed Raleigh’s
drinking water between 6,000 and 7,000 times a month for many substances such as trace metals,
petroleum products, pesticides and bacteria. During 2016, the City of Raleigh was in compliance with all
national Primary Drinking Water Regulations.
Water Quality Data
Contaminant (units) MCL Violation Y/N Your Water MCLG MCL Like Source of Contamination
E. Coli (presence or absence) N 0 0
(Note: If either an original routine sample and/
or its repeat samples(s) are E. coli positive, a Tier
1 violation exists)
Human and animal fecal waste
MICROBIOLOGICAL CONTAMINANTS
E.M. Johnson Plant
Contaminant (units)
Treatment Tech-
nique (TT) Viola-
tion Y/N
Your Water Treatment Technique (TT) Violation if: Like Source of Contamination
Turbidity (NTU) - Highest single tur-
bidity measurement N 0.15 Turbidity > 1 NTU
Soil runoff Turbidity (NTU) - Lowest monthly
percentage (%) of samples meeting
turbidity limits
N 100% Less than 95% of monthly turbidity measure-
ments are ≤ 0.3 NTU
TURBIDITY
Contaminant (units) Sample Date MCL Viola-
tion Y/N Your Water Range
Low High MCLG MCL Like Source of Contamination
Fluoride (ppm) 1/9/2018 N 0.71 N/A 4 4 Erosion of natural deposits; water additive
which promotes strong teeth; discharge from
fertilizer and aluminum factories
INORGANIC CONTAMINANTS
Contaminant (units) Sample Date Your Water # of sites found
above the AL MCLG MCL Like Source of Contamination
Copper (ppm) (90th percentile) 2016 0.04 0 1.3 AL = 1.3 Corrosion of household plumbing systems; erosion of natural
deposits; leaching from wood preservatives
Lead (ppb) (90th percentile) 2016 <3 1 0 AL = 15 Corrosion of household plumbing systems, erosion of natural
deposits
LEAD AND COPPER CONTAMINANTS
*Turbidity is a measure of the cloudiness of the water. We monitor it because it is a good indicator of the effectiveness of our filtration system.
The Tubidity rule requires that 95% or more of the monthly samples must be less than or equal to 0.3 NTU.

Excerpted Regulatory Files:

Exxon
4359 Six Forks Road

Excerpted Regulatory Files:

Brothers Cleaners
4221 Six Forks Road

Via E-Mail
February 26, 2019
Mr. Mike Cunningham
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management, Superfund Section
Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Program
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646
Re: Vapor Intrusion Assessment Activities
Brothers Cleaners
4221 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
DSCA ID No. DC920017
H&H Job No. DS0-39N
Dear Mike:
1.0 Introduction
Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) has prepared this letter report to document vapor intrusion
assessment activities performed at the above referenced Brothers Cleaners site in Raleigh, North
Carolina. Specifically, indoor air sampling was conducted at the City of Raleigh Fire Station #9
(fire station), an off-source property located at 4465 Six Forks Road. A site location map is
included as Figure 1. The work was completed under the North Carolina Dry-cleaning Solvent
Cleanup Act (DSCA) Program State Lead Authorization for Work (SLAW) #22.
Prior vapor intrusion assessment at the fire station included soil gas and indoor air sampling in
February and April 2014, respectively. The results of the 2014 assessment activities indicated
exceedances of residential risk levels in the soil gas sample (SVMP-8) collected in closest
proximity to the source property. However, indoor air samples indicated no exceedances of
residential or non-residential risk levels. In April 2018, additional soil gas samples were
Mr. Mike Cunningham
February 26, 2019
Page 2
\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\DSCA - DS0\DS0-39 Brothers Cleaners\Reports\2019 Indoor Air - Fire
Department\Report\DC920017_20190226_VILetter.doc
collected from the source property along the shared property boundary with the fire station. The
results of the 2018 soil gas sampling indicated exceedances of residential risk levels.
In December 2018, H&H performed additional evaluation of the previously collected sampling
data using exposure assumptions that were more indicative of actual exposures for fire station
occupants. Based on discussions with fire station personnel, H&H understands that employees
work in shift cycles consisting of 24 hours (hrs) on, 24 hrs off, 24 hrs on, 24 hrs off, 24 hrs on,
96 hr off, and then the cycle starts again. This equates to exposure for approximately 122 days
over the course of a year with 24 hrs of exposure per day. The NC Risk Calculator was used to
evaluate risk levels associated with this exposure scenario. The results of the evaluation indicated
exceedances of acceptable risk levels based on soil gas concentrations, but no exceedances of
acceptable risk levels based on indoor air concentrations. Since indoor air concentrations do not
exceed acceptable levels, vapor intrusion does not pose a risk to building occupants under
current conditions.
This report documents additional indoor air samples collected in the fire station during winter
months to evaluate estimated “worst-cast” vapor intrusion conditions.
2.0 Indoor Air Sampling
On January 10, 2019, H&H collected indoor air sample IAS-2 from the fire station. The air
sample was collected in the fire station’s sleeping quarters area and at breathing zone height,
approximately 3 to 5 feet above ground surface. The sample was collected using a 6-liter Summa
canister regulated to collect the sample over a 24-hour period. After sample collection, the
canister was shipped to Con-Test Analytical Laboratory for analysis of tetrachloroethylene
(PCE), trichloroethylene (TCE), cis-1,2-dichloroethylene (DCE), trans-1,2-DCE, and vinyl
chloride by EPA Method TO-15. The laboratory analytical report and chain-of-custody record is
provided in Appendix A. A photograph of the air sampling location is provided in Appendix B.
Mr. Mike Cunningham
February 26, 2019
Page 3
\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\DSCA - DS0\DS0-39 Brothers Cleaners\Reports\2019 Indoor Air - Fire
Department\Report\DC920017_20190226_VILetter.doc
The results of the indoor air analysis indicated a detectable concentration of PCE in the indoor
air sample. A summary of laboratory analytical results is provided in the attached Table 1. The
results are also shown on Figure 2.
H&H used the DSCA Program’s Indoor Air Risk Calculator to evaluate the risk associated with
the detected PCE concentration under both non-residential and residential use scenarios. In
addition, H&H used the NC Risk Calculator to evaluate the risk under the site-specific fire
station exposure scenario, which assumes exposure for approximately 122 days over the course
of a year with 24 hrs of exposure per day, as discussed in Section 1.0. Copies of the risk
calculators are provided in Appendix C, and the results are summarized below.
Sample
ID Date
Residential Non-Residential Fire Station Scenario
Carcin-
ogenic
Risk
Hazard
Index
Carcino-
genic
Risk
Hazard
Index
Carcino-
genic
Risk
Hazard
Index
IAS-2 1/10/2019 1.9E-07 0.048 4.2E-08 0.011 6.2E-08 0.017
The DSCA Program’s acceptable risk limits are a cumulative carcinogenic risk 1.0E-04 and non-
carcinogenic hazard index (HI) of 1.0. As shown above, indoor air concentrations in the fire
station do not exceed the DSCA Program’s acceptable risk limits under residential, non-
residential, or fire station specific exposure scenarios.
3.0 Summary and Recommendations
On January 10, 2019, H&H collected indoor air sample IAS-2 from the City of Raleigh Fire
Station #9. The results of the sampling indicate no exceedances of acceptable risk levels under
residential, non-residential, or fire station specific exposure scenarios.
Mr. Mike Cunningham
February 26, 2019
Page 4
\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\DSCA - DS0\DS0-39 Brothers Cleaners\Reports\2019 Indoor Air - Fire
Department\Report\DC920017_20190226_VILetter.doc
H&H appreciates the opportunity to work with you on this project. Should you have any
questions or need any additional information, please feel free to contact us.
Sincerely,
Hart & Hickman, PC
Justin Ballard, PG Genna Olson, PG
Senior Project Geologist Senior Project Manager
Attachments
Table 1: Analytical Data for Indoor and Outdoor AirDSCA ID No.: DC920017Benzenecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneEthylbenzeneMethyl tert-butyl ether(MTBE)NaphthaleneTetrachloroethyleneToluenetrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneTrichloroethyleneVinyl chlorideXylenes (total)IAS-1 11/09/10 C SU 8hNA<0.0372NA NA NA0.367NA<0.03760.0438 J0.139NABAS-1 11/09/10 SU 8hNA<0.0367NA NA NA0.0841NA<0.03700.0225 J<0.0241NA04/11/14 C SU 8hNA0.81NA NA NA0.53NA0.20<0.19 <0.090 NA01/10/19 C SU 24hNA<0.14NANANA2.0NA <0.14 <0.19 <0.090 NAIAS-3 04/08/14 C SU 8hNA <0.14 NA NA NA0.84NA <0.14 <0.19 <0.090 NAIAS-4 04/08/14 C SU 8hNA <0.14 NA NA NA1.8NA <0.14 <0.190.21NA3.6 NE 11 110 0.63 8.3 1,000 NE 0.42 1.7 2116 NE 49 470 26 35 4,400 NE 1.8 28 88DEQ Non-Residential IASLsNotes:1. NA = Not Analyzed; NE = Not Established2. Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Non-Residential and Residential Indoor Air Screening Levels (IASLs) based on a target carcinogenic risk of 1E-05 and hazard quotient of 0.2 (February2018) are provided for reference.3. Samples were analyzed using EPA Method TO-15.4. J flag denotes estimated concentration between laboratory reporting limit and method detection limit.DEQ Residential IASLsSample Location 1Sampling Duration 3Sampling Method 2IAS-2Sample IDSampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[μg/m3]ADT 1Page 1 of 1
RESID
E
N
C
E
S
RETAIL
,

A
N
D
PARKI
N
G

G
A
R
A
G
E,
BONEF
I
S
H
GRILL
PANER
ABREAD
NORTH HILLS MALLNORTH HILLS MALLTHE R
E
SI
D
E
N
C
E
S
AT LAS
SI
T
E
R
PARKINGPARKING
WALGR
E
E
N
S
TOTAL
WINE LASSITER

M
I
L
L

R
O
A
D
EXXON STATION
DARTM
O
U
T
H
R
O
A
D
SIX

FO
RK
S
RO
AD
CLIFF BENSON
B
E
L
T
L
I
N
E

-

I
N
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E

4
4
0
LAKESTON
E

D
R
I
V
E LASSITER MILL ROADROCKINGHAM DRIVEROWAN STREETPAMLICO
DR
IVE
FORMER LOCATION OFBROTHERS CLEANERS
SVMP-20SVMP-19
SVMP-1
SVMP-2
SVMP-9
SVMP-10
SVMP-8SVMP-11
SVMP-7
SVMP-12
SVMP-6
SVMP-5
SVMP-4
SVMP-3
SVMP-13
SVMP-14
SVMP-15
SVMP-16
SVMP-17SVMP-18
IAS-2
IAS-3
IAS-4
IAS-1 BAS-1
W. ROW
A
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
IAS-2 4/11/14 1/10/19
PCE 0.53 2.0
cis-1,2-DCE 0.81 <0.14
trans-1,2-DCE 0.20 <0.14
RES CR 4.9E-08 1.9E-07
RES HI 1.3E-02 4.8E-02
NON-RES CR 1.1E-08 4.2E-08
NON-RES HI 3.0E-03 1.1E-02
LEGEND
SOURCE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
NON-SOURCE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
SURFACE WATER FEATURE
TEMPORARY SOIL GAS MONITORING
POINT
INDOOR AIR SAMPLE LOCATION
JOB NO. DS0-39
REVISION NO. 0DATE: 1-21-19
ATTACHMENT NO. 
BROTHERS CLEANERS
DSCA ID: DC920017
4221 SIX FORKS ROAD
RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY
INDOOR AIR & SOIL GAS CONTAMINANT
CONCENTRATION MAP
CONCENTRATION
(μg/m3)
SAMPLE DATE
RISK VALUE
NOTES:
1. PCE = TETRACHLOROETHYLENETCE = TRICHLOROETHYLENE
DCE = DICHLOROETHYLENEVC = VINYL CHLORIDE
RES CR = CARCINOGENIC RISK (RESIDENTIAL)RES HI = NON-CARCINOGENIC HAZARD INDEX (RESIDENTIAL)
NON-RES CR = CARCINOGENIC RISK (NON-RESIDENTIAL)NON-RES HI = NON-CARCINOGENIC HAZARD INDEX
(NON-RESIDENTIAL)J = ESTIMATED VALUE
2. CARCINOGENIC RISK & HAZARD INDEX VALUES IN BOLDEXCEED DSCA PROGRAM'S ACCEPTABLE LIMITS OF 1E-04 FORCARCINOGENIC RISK OR 1.0E+00 FOR HAZARD INDEX.
3. YELLOW SHADING INDICATES OWNER OF PROPERTY HAS THESAME MAILING ADDRESS AS THE SOURCE PROPERTY OWNER &
IS THEREFORE ASSUMED TO BE AFFILIATED WITH THE SOURCEPROPERTY OWNER.
SVMP-17 (2/28/14)
PCE 2,000
TCE 6.8
cis-1,2-DCE 3.3
RES CR 6.0E-06
RES HI 1.5E+00
NON-RES CR 4.5E-07
NON-RES HI 1.2E-01
IAS-2 4/11/14 1/10/19
PCE 0.53 2.0
cis-1,2-DCE 0.81 <0.14
trans-1,2-DCE 0.20 <0.14
RES CR 4.9E-08 1.9E-07
RES HI 1.3E-02 4.8E-02
NON-RES CR 1.1E-08 4.2E-08
NON-RES HI 3.0E-03 1.1E-02
SVMP-9 (2/27/14)
PCE 470
TCE 0.39 J
RES CR 1.3E-06
RES HI 3.4E-01
NON-RES CR 1.0E-07
NON-RES HI 2.7E-02
SVMP-8 (2/27/14)
PCE 4,200
TCE 1.2
RES CR 1.2E-05
RES HI 3.0E+00
NON-RES CR 8.9E-07
NON-RES HI 2.4E-01
SVMP-6 (2/27/14)
PCE 8,600
TCE 3.7
RES CR 2.4E-05
RES HI 6.2E+00
NON-RES CR 1.8E-06
NON-RES HI 5.0E-01
SVMP-5 (2/27/14)
PCE 2,500
TCE 1.6
RES CR 7.0E-06
RES HI 1.8E+00
NON-RES CR 5.4E-07
NON-RES HI 1.4E-01
SVMP-4 (2/27/14)
PCE 1,100
TCE 3.8
cis-1,2-DCE 0.20 J
trans-1,2-DCE 0.20 J
RES CR 3.3E-06
RES HI 8.5E-01
NON-RES CR 2.5E-07
NON-RES HI 6.7E-02
SVMP-3 (2/27/14)
PCE <1.10
TCE 18
cis-1,2-DCE 21
RES CR 4.7E-06
RES HI 1.2E+00
NON-RES CR 3.4E-07
NON-RES HI 9.5E-02
SVMP-13 (2/28/14)
PCE 680
TCE 17
cis-1,2-DCE 16
trans-1,2-DCE 0.52
RES CR 3.0E-06
RES HI 7.3E-01
NON-RES CR 2.0E-07
NON-RES HI 5.8E-02
SVMP-14 (2/28/14)
PCE 190
TCE 0.33 J
VC 0.24 J
RES CR 5.9E-07
RES HI 1.4E-01
NON-RES CR 4.2E-08
NON-RES HI 1.1E-02
SVMP-15 (2/28/14)
PCE 390
TCE 1.2
cis-1,2-DCE 0.44
trans-1,2-DCE 0.25 J
RES CR 1.2E-06
RES HI 3.0E-01
NON-RES CR 8.7E-08
NON-RES HI 2.4E-02
SVMP-16 (2/28/14)
PCE 5,300
TCE 17
cis-1,2-DCE 14
trans-1,2-DCE 0.49
RES CR 1.6E-05
RES HI 4.1E+00
NON-RES CR 1.2E-06
NON-RES HI 3.2E-01
SVMP-18 (2/28/14)
PCE 1,400
TCE 9.7
RES CR 4.5E-06
RES HI 1.1E+00
NON-RES CR 3.3E-07
NON-RES HI 9.1E-02
SVMP-19 (4/18/17)
PCE 27
VC 0.47 J
RES CR 3.3E-07
RES HI 2.0E-02
NON-RES CR 1.1E-08
NON-RES HI 1.6E-03
SVMP-20 (4/18/17)
PCE 5.5
VC 1.4
RES CR 2.7E-07
RES HI 4.4E-03
NON-RES CR 6.2E-09
NON-RES HI 3.5E-04
SVMP-2 (8/26/10)
PCE <1.10
RES CR 0
RES HI 0
NON-RES CR 0
NON-RES HI 0
SVMP-1 (8/26/10)
PCE 680
TCE 1.75 J
RES CR 2.0E-06
RES HI 5.1E-01
NON-RES CR 1.5E-07
NON-RES HI 4.1E-02
IAS-3 (4/11/14)
PCE 0.84
RES CR 7.8E-08
RES HI 2.0E-02
NON-RES CR 1.8E-08
NON-RES HI 4.8E-03
SVMP-12 (2/28/14)
PCE 34
RES CR 9.4E-08
RES HI 2.4E-02
NON-RES CR 7.2E-09
NON-RES HI 1.9E-03
SVMP-7 (2/27/14)
PCE 550
TCE 0.35 J
RES CR 1.5E-06
RES HI 4.0E-01
NON-RES CR 1.2E-07
NON-RES HI 3.2E-02
SVMP-11 (2/27/14)
PCE 520
TCE 0.19 J
RES CR 1.5E-06
RES HI 3.8E-01
NON-RES CR 1.1E-07
NON-RES HI 3.0E-02
SVMP-10 (2/27/14)
PCE 3.5
RES CR 9.7E-09
RES HI 2.5E-03
NON-RES CR 7.4E-10
NON-RES HI 2.0E-04
IAS-4 (4/11/14)
PCE 1.8
VC 0.21
RES CR 1.4E-06
RES HI 4.5E-02
NON-RES CR 1.1E-07
NON-RES HI 1.1E-02
BAS-1 (11/9/10)
PCE 0.0841
TCE 0.0225 J
RES CR 5.5E-08
RES HI 1.3E-02
NON-RES CR 9.3E-09
NON-RES HI 3.0E-03
IAS-1 (11/9/10)
PCE 0.367
TCE 0.0438 J
VC 0.139
RES CR 4.5E-07
RES HI 3.1E-02
NON-RES CR 7.2E-08
NON-RES HI 7.4E-03
SAMPLE ID
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301Raleigh, North Carolina 27607919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
S:\AAA-Master Projects\DSCA - DS0\DS0-39 Brothers Cleaners\Reports\2017 Comprehensive Figures for Closure\Figures\DC920017_20190121.dwg, ATT 13 14, 1/21/2019 2:15:33 PM,SVincentF,5(67$7,21
DSCA ID No.:
Submittal Date:
Reporting Period:to
Type of Report:One-Time Event Quaterly
Semi-Annual Annual
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100, Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
Hart & Hickman, PC
November 30, 2016
DC920017
August/September 2016
Groundwater Monitoring Report Forms
for
North Carolina Dry-Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act Program
Prepared By:
Facility Name: Brothers Cleaners
4221 Six Forks Road, Raleigh, Wake County
Table of Contents
DSCA ID No.: DC920017
Form/Att
. No.
Check box
if included
Form 1 Report Summary
Form 2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures
Form 3 Results, Conclusions and Recommendations
Att. 1
Att. 2
Att. 3
Att. 4
Att. 5
Att. 6
Att. 7
Att. 8
Site Map
Groundwater Gradient Map
GWMR TOC
Description
Grooundwater Monitoring Report Attachments
Groundwater Monitoring Report Forms
Groundwater Contaminant Concentration Map
Groundwater Concentration Trend Plots
Laboratory Analytical Report
Disposal of IDW receipts from receiving facilities, or any required harzardous
Site Location Map
Report Summary
DSCA ID No.: DC920017
Dates samples were collected:
Number of existing monitoring wells:
List the sampled monitoring wells:
List the sampled water supply wells:
List surface water samples collected:
Date analyses were performed:
Were any holding times exceeded?
Dates monitoring/supply wells were gauged:
disposal?
Average depth to groundwater:
Groundwater flow direction:
Was the static groundwater level above the top of the well screen in any wells?
If Yes, indicate which wells:
Is the aquifer:
Were any existing monitoring wells damaged?
If Yes, indicate which wells:
Has the groundwater plume been defined?
Any ongoing assessment activities?
If Yes, provide details in the space below:
Any ongoing remediation activites?
If Yes, provide details in the space below:
Any significant changes in the subsurface conditions?
If Yes, provide details in the space below:
MW-14, MW-15, MW-15D, and MW-16
08/24/16
South
MW-5, MW-6, MW-7, MW-8, MW-8D, MW-9, MW-10, MW-11,
None
None
MW-12, MW-13, MW-13D, MW-14, MW-15, MW-16, MW-17, MW-18, EMW,-26 and EMW-40
approximately 30 ft (excluding deep wells)
09/07/16
22 DSCA wells and multiple Exxon Wells
MW-1, MW-3, MW-8, MW-8D, MW-13, MW-13D,
09/16/16
Does investigation derived waste (IDW) generated during these activities still remain at the site pending
GWMR Form 1
Yes No
Yes No
Confined Unconfined Perched
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures
DSCA ID No.: DC920017
Describe the specific sampling technicque employed during the collection of all ground water samples.
Groundwater samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260B by Prism
Laboratories, Inc. The maximum holding time for VOC analysis is 14 days from the sample collection date
(when the sample is preserved in HCl). All samples were analyzed within this timeframe.
GWMR Form 2
Describe the standard quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures which are practiced in order to
ensure that the samples are representative of actual conditions and that analytical results are valid.
Describe the EPA approved methods used to extract and analyze the samples submitted the laboratory.
Reference the maximum holding time for each type of analysis performed.
The water level meter was decontaminated using isopropanol, liquinox, and deionized water after each well
was gauged or measured to avoid cross-contamination. New passive diffusion bags and nylon cord were used
at each well. Stainless steel weights were decontaminated before use in wells. New sterile nitrile gloves were
used for sampling of each monitoring well. Samples were collected directly into laboratory-prepared sample
containers, labeled with the site and sample identification, time, date, sampler's initials, and analysis method.
Samples were secured in protective wrap or bags before being covered with ice and cooled to 4 degrees Celcius
in a cooler. A sample chain-of-custody was completed and placed in the sample cooler. The coolers were
delivered by field personnel to the shipment company for delivery to Prism Laboratories, Inc. The laboratory
ran standard Type II QC measures.
Passive diffusion bags (PDBs) were utilized for collection of the groundwater samples. The PDBs were
received from the supplier in sealed plastic bags. Prior to deployment of the PDBs, the water level in each well
was gauged using a decontaminated water level meter. Nylon bailer cord was attached to a decontaminated,
stainless steel weight, and the PDB was tied to the cord such that the bottom of each PDB would be
approximately two feet above the bottom of the well. Each PDB was slowly lowered into the well to minimize
disturbance. Following a two-week equilibration time, the PDBs were removed. Samples were collected by
inserting a PDB manufacturer-supplied plastic straw into the PDBs and pouring the water into laboratory-
provided sample containers. Field parameters were not collected during groundwater sampling activities.
Results, Conclusions and Recommendations
DSCA ID No.:
Sampling
Date Sample ID Concentration
[mg/L]
Sampling
Date Sample ID Concentration
[mg/L]
09/07/16 MW-13 0.210 06/17/09 MW-13 0.74
09/07/16 MW-13 0.002 11/25/08 MW-13 0.0057
09/07/16 ND ND ND ND ND
09/07/16 MW-15 0.0087 06/17/09 MW-15 0.061
Note: Several petroleum constituents associated with the Exxon release have also been detected historically,
primarily in the vicinity of the Exxon site.
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
GWMR Form 3
Results
Maximum Concentration Detected in Groundwater
Chemical
Most Recent Event Detected at Site To-date
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl Chloride
The site is not currently a potential candidate for site closure, because the plume has not been delineated. Soil
gas concentrations on non-source properties may also be an obstacle to site closure. H&H recommends
conducting limited groundwater monitoring at a frequency of approximately once every two years, until the site
can be put on a track towards closure.
Instructions: Discuss any trends or changes noted in analytical results.
Conclusions
Recommendations
Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) completed a limited groundwater monitoring event at the Brothers Cleaners site to evaluate
current groundwater concentrations in nine of the site monitoring wells. The primary constituent of concern at the site is
PCE, which has been detected in numerous wells at concentrations above the DSCA Tier 1 RBSL. TCE has also been
detected in a few downgradient wells at concentrations slightly above the Tier 1 RBSL, and cis-1,2-DCE has been
detected in a few downgradient wells at concentrations below the Tier 1 RBSL.
Graphs depicting PCE concentrations versus time are provided in Attachment 6. PCE concentrations detected in August
and September 2016 were generally consistent with or lower than historical concentrations. Although PCE
concentrations have fluctuated in some wells over time, concentrations generally appear to be stable or decreasing at the
site.
DSCA ID No.:
Submittal Date:
Analytical Data Tables
for
North Carolina Dry-Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act Program
Prepared By:
Facility Name:Brothers Cleaners
4221 Six Forks Road, Raleigh, Wake County
3334 Hillsborough Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Hart & Hickman, PC
November 30, 2016
DC920017
Table of Contents
DSCA ID No.: DC920017
Table/
Att. No.
Check box
if included
Table 1 Site Chronology
Table 2 Analytical Data for Soil
Table 3 Analytical Data for Sub-slab Gas
Table 4 Analytical Data for Soil Gas
Table 5 Analytical Data for Indoor and Outdoor Air
Table 6 Monitoring Well Construction Data
Table 7 Groundwater Elevation Data
Table 8 Analytical Data for Groundwater
Table 9 Analytical Data for Surface Water
Table 10 Water Well(s) Survey Data
Table 11 Analytical Data for Water Supply Well(s)
Table 12 Analytical Data for Natural Attenuation Parameters
Att. 1 Site map showing location(s) of soil boring(s).
Att. 2
Att. 3 Soil isoconcentration maps.
Att. 4 Site map showing location(s) of monitoring well(s).
Att. 5
Att. 6 Groundwater gradient map for each sampling event.
Att. 7
Att. 8
Att. 9 Map showing location(s) of surface water sample(s) (if applicable).
Att. 10
Att. 11
Att. 12
Att. 13
Att. 14 Air and soil gas concentration map showing the concentration at each sampling point.
Att. 15
Att. 16
Att. 17
Att. 18
Att. 19
Att. 20
Att. 21
Note:
1. All maps must include a bar scale, north arrow, site name, DSCA ID No., and date.
ADT TOC
Description
Attachments
Tables
Groundwater concentration trend plots.
USGS Quad map with plotted water well location(s) within the 1,500 foot and 0.5
mile radii of the site (if applicable).
Signed laboratory analytical reports including chain-of custody and quality
assurance/quality control (QA/QC) documentation (only if not previously
submitted).
Soil contaminant concentration maps showing the concentration at each sampling
point.
Site map showing location(s) of indoor air, outdoor air, or soil gas samples.
Well completion diagrams and records of construction submitted to state.
PCE concentration map showing the concentration at each sampling point and
isoconcentration map. However, if there are significant plumes for other dry-
cleaning contaminants, contaminant concentration maps for each chemical of
concern should be included.
Surface water concentration map showing the concentration at each sampling
point (if applicable).
Site map showing location(s) of monitoring well(s) for natural attenuation paramete
Page 1 of 2
Table 1: Site Chronology
DSCA ID No.: DC920017
Chronology of Events
November 2000
A Phase II environmental site assessment (ESA) was conducted by Withers and Ravenel. The assessment revealed
groundwater impacts in exceedance of NCAC 2L groundwater standards (2L standards). NCDENR was notified of the
results in December 2000.
August 2002 A Petition for Certification for the site to be entered into the DSCA Program was submitted. In September 2002, the
petition was accepted, and the site was entered into the Program.
September 2003
A Prioritization Assessment (PA) report was completed by Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc. (Mid-Atlantic). PA activities
included: a receptor survey; soil sample collection; and monitoring well installation and sampling (MW-1 through MW-
4). Soil excavation as an interim corrective action was also performed. Soil was excavated in two areas, the extent and
details of which are provided in the Prioritization Assessment Report, dated 09/16/2003.
September 2003
(North Hills Exxon)
Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA) activities at an Exxon gas station located downgradient of the Brothers site
revealed PCE and daughter product impacts off-site on the North Hills Mall property. The Exxon CSA included a
receptor survey that included sampling of 5 private supply wells; PCE was not detected.
February 2006
ENSR updated the PA by: updating the receptor survey (1,500 ft radius), installing one additional well (MW-5), and
collecting groundwater samples from the site's five wells (MW-1 through MW-5). Surface water samples (SW-1 through
SW-3) were collected from three tributaries of Crabtree Creek . ENSR re-scored the Site using the current NCDENR
Prioritization Ranking Form (PRF) and obtained a score of 1.4 due to surface water detections above the 2B Standard.
November 2006
ENSR installed five additional groundwater monitoring wells (MW-6, MW-7, MW-8, MW-9 and MW-10) and collected
groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-2 through MW-10. Surface water samples were again collected at the
SW-1, SW-2, & SW-3 locations.
November 2007
ENSR installed seven off-site, groundwater monitoring wells (MW-8D, MW-11, MW-12, MW-13, MW-13D, MW-14
and MW-15). After well installation, the site entered a semi-annual groundwater monitoring schedule. Groundwater
samples were collected from the 17 DSCA-owned monitoring wells and from eight monitoring wells associated with the
North Hills Exxon station (EMW-3, EMW-7, EMW-10, EMW-15, EMW-37, EMW-39, EMW-40 and EMW-43).
Surface water samples were again collected at the SW-1, SW-2, & SW-3 locations.
May 2008
As part of the semi-annual groundwater monitoring schedule, groundwater samples were collected from the 17 DSCA-
owned monitoring wells and from eight monitoring wells associated with the North Hills Exxon station (EMW-3, EMW-
7, EMW-10, EMW-15, EMW-37, EMW-39, EMW-40 and EMW-43). Surface water samples were again collected at
the SW-1, SW-2, & SW-3 locations.
November 2008
Hart & Hickman, PC conducted semi-annual groundwater sampling; samples were collected from the 17 DSCA-owned
monitoring wells and from eight monitoring wells associated with the North Hills Exxon station (EMW-3, EMW-7,
EMW-10, EMW-15, EMW-26, EMW-28, EMW-32, and EMW-42). Surface water samples could not be collected due
to lack of water at the three locations previously sampled (SW-1, SW-2, & SW-3).
June 2009
Hart & Hickman, PC conducted semi-annual groundwater sampling with the use of passive diffusion bags (PDBs).
Groundwater samples were collected from the 17 DSCA-owned monitoring wells and from eight monitoring wells
associated with the North Hills Exxon station (EMW-3, EMW-7, EMW-10, EMW-15, EMW-26, EMW-28, EMW-32,
EMW-37, EMW-40, EMW-42, and EMW-43). Surface water samples could not be collected due to lack of water at the
three locations previously sampled (SW-1, SW-2, & SW-3). An Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report documenting
the November 2008 and June 2009 sampling events was submitted to DSCA in August 2009.
August 2009 H&H installed and sampled monitoring wells MW-16 through MW-19 and MW-15D to further delineate the
groundwater plume. H&H submitted the analytical results for the new wells to DSCA on via email on October 20, 2009.
April 22, 2010 H&H conducted a semi-annual groundwater monitoring event at select wells using passive diffusion bags.
Instructions: Brief description of all significant events that have occurred since a problem was
suspected at the facility. Commence with the first date a problem was suspected and continue
through the most recent activity described in the current report.
Date
ADT 1
Page 2 of 2
Table 1: Site Chronology
DSCA ID No.: DC920017
Chronology of Events
Instructions: Brief description of all significant events that have occurred since a problem was
suspected at the facility. Commence with the first date a problem was suspected and continue
through the most recent activity described in the current report.
Date
ADT 1
August 26, 2010
H&H collected subsurface soil gas samples near monitoring well MW-13 to evaluate the potential for vapor intrusion
from groundwater impacts associated with the site. PCE was detected above IHSB vapor intrusion screening levels in
one of the subsurface soil gas samples (SVMP-1)
November 9, 2010
H&H collected one background, outdoor air sample and one indoor air sample (inside the tenant space near SVMP-1,
4381-105 Lassiter at North Hills Ave) to further evaluate potential for vapor intrusion at the site. Low concentrations of
dry-cleaning constituents below the EPA RSLs for industrial air were detected in the indoor air sample.
October 28, 2010 H&H conducted a semi-annual groundwater monitoring event at select wells using passive diffusion bags.
December 7, 2010
H&H submitted a Vapor Intrusion Assessment Results letter to the DSCA Program documenting the results of
subsurface soil gas and ambient air sampling activities. The calculated indoor air cumulative risk for the site was
determined to be less than 1 x 10-6; thus, no additional vapor intrusion assessment activities were recommended.
January 13, 2011 H&H submitted a Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report documenting the April 2010 and October 2010
sampling events.
August - September
2012
H&H conducted a limited groundwater monitoring to evaluate current groundwater concentrations at select wells using
passive diffusion bags. On October 19, 2012, H&H submitted a Groundwater Monitoring Report to the DSCA Program
to document the sampling activities and results.
February and April
2014
H&H collected 16 near-slab subsurface soil gas samples at locations adjacent to on- and off-site occupied buildings.
Based on soil gas analytical results, three indoor air samples were collected in a City of Raleigh fire station and two
tenant spaces. On June 26, 2014, H&H submitted a letter report to the DSCA Program documenting the vapor intrusion
assessment activities and results.
August 2014
H&H conducted a limited groundwater monitoring to evaluate current groundwater concentrations in select monitoring
wells using passive diffusion bags. On October 31, 2014, H&H submitted a Groundwater Monitoring Report to the
DSCA Program to document the sampling activities and results.
August and
September 2016
H&H conducted a limited groundwater monitoring to evaluate current groundwater concentrations in select monitoring
wells using passive diffusion bags. On November 30, 2016, H&H submitted a Groundwater Monitoring Report to the
DSCA Program to document the sampling activities and results.
Page 1 of 1Table 6: Monitoring Well Construction DataDSCA ID No.: DC920017Well IDDate Installed(mm/dd/yy)Number of SamplesWell Depth[feet]Well Diameter [inch]Screen Interval[feet]Status(Active/Inactive)MW-1 02/04/03 10 40 1 30 - 40 ActiveMW-2 02/04/03 9 40 1 30 - 40 ActiveMW-3 02/04/03 11 42 1 32 - 42 ActiveMW-4 02/04/03 9 40 1 30 - 40 ActiveMW-5 02/07/05 8 45 2 35 - 45 ActiveMW-6 11/08/06 7 48 2 38 - 48 ActiveMW-7 11/17/06 7 45 2 35 - 45 ActiveMW-8 11/07/06 9 46 2 41 - 46 ActiveMW-8D 10/26/07 8 69 2 64 - 69 ActiveMW-9 11/07/06 7 48 2 43 - 48 ActiveMW-10 11/08/06 7 49.5 2 44.5 - 49.5 ActiveMW-11 10/26/07 6 50 2 45 - 50 ActiveMW-12 10/30/07 5 48 2 43 - 48 ActiveMW-13 10/23/07 9 60 2 55 - 60 ActiveMW-13D 10/25/07 9 85 2 80 - 85 ActiveMW-14 10/30/07 8 85 2 80 - 85 ActiveMW-15 10/22/07 9 55 2 50 - 55 ActiveMW-15D 07/21/09 6 175 2 165 - 175 ActiveMW-16 07/16/09 6 55 2 45 - 55 ActiveMW-17 07/16/09 4 40 2 20 - 40 ActiveMW-18 07/16/09 3 50 2 40 - 50 ActiveMW-19 07/16/09 3 40 2 30 - 40 ActiveEMW-3 08/18/98 2 40 2 20 - 40 ActiveEMW-7 07/27/00 5 35 2 20 - 35 ActiveEMW-10 07/27/00 2 35 2 20 - 35 ActiveEMW-15 08/16/00 2 35 2 20 - 35 ActiveEMW-26 08/30/01 9 40 2 25 - 40 ActiveEMW-28 09/04/01 7 62 2 38 - 58 ActiveEMW-32 03/28/02 3 36 2 26 - 36 ActiveEMW-37 03/29/02 1 34 2 24 - 34 ActiveEMW-40 11/14/03 8 55 2 50 - 55 ActiveEMW-42 NA 6 NA 2 NA ActiveEMW-43 01/07/04 3 50 2 35 - 50 ActiveNotes:1. The number of sampling events identified for the EMW wells above represents only the data available to H&H for these wells. Additional sampling events may have been completed for these wells as part of assessment activities being conducted at the North Hills Exxon.2. MW-8D, MW-13D, and MW-15D are Type III wells constructed with 6-inch diameter PVC outer casing set at 50 ft, 71 ft, and 165 ft bgs, respectively.3. NA denotes not availableADT 6
Page 1 of 7Table 7: Groundwater Elevation DataDSCA ID No.: DC920017Groundwater Sampling PointSampling Date(mm/dd/yy)TOC Elevation[feet]Depth to Water[feet bgs]Groundwater Elevation[feet]Depth to NAPL[feet bgs]NAPL Thickness[feet]Corrected* Groundwater Elevation [feet]02/04/03 33.39366.13NA NA NA02/10/06 32.58366.94NA NA NA11/14/06 34.91364.61NA NA NA02/15/07 32.87366.65NA NA NA10/29/07 33.33366.19NA NA NA04/30/08 34.53364.99NA NA NA11/24/08 34.73364.79NA NA NA06/04/09 33.69365.83NA NA NA08/24/09 33.85365.67NA NA NA04/08/10 34.08365.44NA NA NA10/14/10 34.04365.48NA NA NA08/29/12 35.17364.35NA NA NA08/13/14 33.28366.24NA NA NA08/24/16NMNMNA NA NA02/04/03 34.67366.08NA NA NA02/10/06 33.8366.95NA NA NA11/14/06 34.17366.58NA NA NA02/15/07 34.13366.62NA NA NA10/29/07 34.89365.86NA NA NA04/30/08 35.81364.94NA NA NA11/24/0836.16 364.59NA NA NA06/04/0934.96 365.79NA NA NA08/24/0935.19 365.56NA NA NA04/08/1035.43 365.32NA NA NA10/14/1035.43 365.32NA NA NA08/29/1236.55 364.20NA NA NA08/13/1434.59 366.16NA NA NA08/24/1635.05 365.70NA NA NA02/04/03 34.02364.23NA NA NA02/10/06 33.13365.12NA NA NA11/14/06 33.39364.86NA NA NA02/15/07 33.46364.79NA NA NA10/29/07 34.20364.05NA NA NA04/30/08 35.20363.05NA NA NA11/24/08NMNMNA NA NA06/04/09 34.51363.74NA NA NA08/24/09 34.60363.65NA NA NA04/08/10 34.98363.27NA NA NA10/14/10 35.03363.22NA NA NA08/29/12 35.85362.40NA NA NA08/13/14 34.07364.18NA NA NA08/24/16 34.63363.62NA NA NAMW-1 399.52MW-2 400.75MW-3 398.25ADT 7
Page 2 of 7Table 7: Groundwater Elevation DataDSCA ID No.: DC920017Groundwater Sampling PointSampling Date(mm/dd/yy)TOC Elevation[feet]Depth to Water[feet bgs]Groundwater Elevation[feet]Depth to NAPL[feet bgs]NAPL Thickness[feet]Corrected* Groundwater Elevation [feet]ADT 702/04/03 34.63364.69NA NA NA02/10/06 31.14368.18NA NA NA11/14/06 31.50367.82NA NA NA02/15/07 31.45367.87NA NA NA10/29/07 32.19367.13NA NA NA04/30/08 33.14366.18NA NA NA11/24/08 33.31366.01NA NA NA06/04/09 32.23367.09NA NA NA08/24/09 32.42366.90NA NA NA04/08/10 32.49366.83NA NA NA10/14/10 32.44366.88NA NA NA08/29/12 33.67365.65NA NA NA08/13/14 31.73367.59NA NA NA08/24/16 32.24367.08NA NA NA02/10/06 32.19366.18NA NA NA11/13/06 32.45365.92NA NA NA02/15/07 32.46365.91NA NA NA10/29/07 33.11365.26NA NA NA04/30/08 34.12364.25NA NA NA11/24/08 34.34364.03NA NA NA06/04/09 33.39364.98NA NA NA08/24/09 33.49364.88NA NA NA04/08/10 33.73364.64NA NA NA10/14/10 33.68364.69NA NA NA08/29/12 34.90363.47NA NA NA08/13/14 33.01365.36NA NA NA08/24/16 33.80364.57NA NA NA11/17/06 45.04352.63NA NA NA02/15/07 28.93368.74NA NA NA10/29/07 28.36369.31NA NA NA04/30/08 35.92361.75NA NA NA11/24/08 28.92368.75NA NA NA06/03/09 30.23367.44NA NA NA08/24/09 28.28369.39NA NA NA04/08/10 28.62369.05NA NA NA10/14/10 28.20369.47NA NA NA08/29/12 29.25368.42NA NA NA08/13/14 28.17369.50NA NA NA08/24/16 28.76368.91NA NA NAMW-5 398.37MW-6 397.67MW-4 399.32
Page 3 of 7Table 7: Groundwater Elevation DataDSCA ID No.: DC920017Groundwater Sampling PointSampling Date(mm/dd/yy)TOC Elevation[feet]Depth to Water[feet bgs]Groundwater Elevation[feet]Depth to NAPL[feet bgs]NAPL Thickness[feet]Corrected* Groundwater Elevation [feet]ADT 711/20/06 28.32365.97NA NA NA02/15/07 25.40368.89NA NA NA10/29/07 26.05368.24NA NA NA04/30/08 27.56366.73NA NA NA11/24/08 27.11367.18NA NA NA06/03/09 26.87367.42NA NA NA08/24/09 26.51367.78NA NA NA04/08/10 26.01368.28NA NA NA10/14/10 26.02368.27NA NA NA08/29/12CNL CNL NA NA NA08/13/14 25.46368.83NA NA NA08/24/16 23.56370.73NA NA NA11/17/06 31.10362.14NA NA NA02/15/07 31.25361.99NA NA NA10/29/07 31.74361.50NA NA NA04/30/08 33.04360.20NA NA NA11/24/08 34.75358.49NA NA NA06/03/09 33.36359.88NA NA NA08/24/09 32.59360.65NA NA NA04/08/10 33.08360.16NA NA NA10/14/10 33.04360.20NA NA NA08/29/12 34.02359.22NA NA NA08/13/14 32.35360.89NA NA NA08/24/16 33.04360.20NA NA NA11/02/07 30.76361.42NA NA NA04/30/08 31.82360.36NA NA NA11/24/08 32.05360.13NA NA NA06/03/09 31.38360.80NA NA NA08/24/09 31.28360.90NA NA NA04/08/10 31.71360.47NA NA NA10/14/10 31.76360.42NA NA NA08/29/12 32.73359.45NA NA NA08/13/14 31.02361.16NA NA NA08/24/16 31.64360.54NA NA NAMW-8 393.24MW-8D 392.18MW-7 394.29
Page 4 of 7Table 7: Groundwater Elevation DataDSCA ID No.: DC920017Groundwater Sampling PointSampling Date(mm/dd/yy)TOC Elevation[feet]Depth to Water[feet bgs]Groundwater Elevation[feet]Depth to NAPL[feet bgs]NAPL Thickness[feet]Corrected* Groundwater Elevation [feet]ADT 702/15/07 32.58362.34NA NA NA10/29/07 33.20361.72NA NA NA04/30/08 34.18360.74NA NA NA11/24/08 34.47360.45NA NA NA06/03/09 33.94360.98NA NA NA08/24/09 33.84361.08NA NA NA04/08/10 34.34360.58NA NA NA10/14/10 34.35360.57NA NA NA08/29/12 34.05360.87NA NA NA08/13/14 33.02361.90NA NA NA08/24/16 33.62361.30NA NA NA02/15/07 33.88365.49NA NA NA10/29/07 34.25365.12NA NA NA04/30/08 35.31364.06NA NA NA11/24/08 35.67363.70NA NA NA06/03/09 34.80364.57NA NA NA08/24/09 34.96364.41NA NA NA04/08/10 35.26364.11NA NA NA10/14/10 35.33364.04NA NA NA08/29/12 36.28363.09NA NA NA08/13/14 34.38364.99NA NA NA08/24/16 34.91364.46NA NA NA11/02/07 26.14360.77NA NA NA04/30/08 26.96359.95NA NA NA11/24/08 27.38359.53NA NA NA06/04/09 26.93359.98NA NA NA08/24/09 26.93359.98NA NA NA04/08/10 27.15359.76NA NA NA10/14/10 27.28359.63NA NA NA08/29/12 28.05358.86NA NA NA08/13/14 29.09357.82NA NA NA08/24/16 27.17359.74NA NA NA11/02/07 23.88353.98NA NA NA04/30/08 23.90353.96NA NA NA11/24/08NMNMNA NA NA06/03/09 23.67354.19NA NA NA08/24/09 23.33354.53NA NA NA04/08/10 23.76354.10NA NA NA10/14/10 23.76354.10NA NA NA08/29/12 24.93352.93NA NA NA08/13/14 24.30353.56NA NA NA08/24/16 24.36353.50NA NA NA394.92MW-10 399.37MW-11 386.91MW-12 377.86MW-9
Page 5 of 7Table 7: Groundwater Elevation DataDSCA ID No.: DC920017Groundwater Sampling PointSampling Date(mm/dd/yy)TOC Elevation[feet]Depth to Water[feet bgs]Groundwater Elevation[feet]Depth to NAPL[feet bgs]NAPL Thickness[feet]Corrected* Groundwater Elevation [feet]ADT 711/02/07 25.06352.47NA NA NA04/30/08 25.66351.87NA NA NA11/24/08 25.62351.91NA NA NA06/03/09 25.38352.15NA NA NA08/24/09 25.23352.30NA NA NA04/08/10 25.46352.07NA NA NA10/14/10 25.20352.33NA NA NA08/29/12 26.45351.08NA NA NA08/13/14 25.61351.92NA NA NA08/24/16 26.68350.85NA NA NA11/02/07 24.58352.55NA NA NA04/30/08 25.16351.97NA NA NA11/24/08 25.08352.05NA NA NA06/03/09 24.91352.22NA NA NA08/24/09 24.75352.38NA NA NA04/08/10 25.05352.08NA NA NA10/14/10 24.82352.31NA NA NA08/29/12 26.01351.12NA NA NA08/13/14 25.17351.96NA NA NA08/24/16 24.56352.57NA NA NA11/02/07 45.63330.58NA NA NA04/30/08 46.68329.53NA NA NA11/24/0846.99 329.22NA NA NA06/03/0947.01 329.20NA NA NA08/24/0946.89 329.32NA NA NA04/08/1046.74 329.47NA NA NA10/14/1045.95 330.26NA NA NA08/29/1248.41 327.80NA NA NA08/13/14NM NMNA NA NA08/24/1645.11 331.10NA NA NA11/02/07 42.19325.97NA NA NA04/30/08 43.21324.95NA NA NA11/24/08 43.64324.52NA NA NA06/04/09 43.76324.40NA NA NA08/24/09 43.25324.91NA NA NA04/08/10 43.27324.89NA NA NA10/14/10 42.50325.66NA NA NA08/29/12 44.90323.26NA NA NA08/13/14 44.84323.32NA NA NA08/24/16 41.90326.26NA NA NA377.53MW-13D 377.13MW-14 376.21MW-15 368.16MW-13
Page 6 of 7Table 7: Groundwater Elevation DataDSCA ID No.: DC920017Groundwater Sampling PointSampling Date(mm/dd/yy)TOC Elevation[feet]Depth to Water[feet bgs]Groundwater Elevation[feet]Depth to NAPL[feet bgs]NAPL Thickness[feet]Corrected* Groundwater Elevation [feet]ADT 708/24/09 42.05326.37NA NA NA04/08/10 41.87326.55NA NA NA10/14/10 41.25327.17NA NA NA08/29/12 43.91324.51NA NA NA08/13/14 42.23326.19NA NA NA08/24/16 40.21328.21NA NA NA08/24/09 43.17313.01NA NA NA04/08/10 44.34311.84NA NA NA10/14/10 42.02314.16NA NA NA08/29/12 46.08310.10NA NA NA08/13/14 44.68311.50NA NA NA08/24/16 44.05312.13NA NA NA08/24/09 9.10313.38NA NA NA04/08/10 6.43316.05NA NA NA10/14/10 8.07314.41NA NA NA08/29/12 9.37313.11NA NA NA08/13/14 6.17316.31NA NA NA08/24/16 6.53315.95NA NA NA08/24/09 13.58349.02NA NA NA04/08/10 13.33349.27NA NA NA10/14/10 13.73348.87NA NA NA08/29/12 14.94347.66NA NA NA08/13/14 13.20349.40NA NA NA08/24/16 13.44349.16NA NA NA08/24/09 33.13367.05NA NA NA04/08/10 33.18367.00NA NA NA10/14/10 33.16367.02NA NA NA08/29/12 34.12366.06NA NA NA08/13/14 32.41367.77NA NA NA08/24/16 32.36367.82NA NA NA11/24/08 23.53334.36NA NA NA06/04/09 23.73334.16NA NA NA08/24/09 23.24334.65NA NA NA04/08/10 23.75334.14NA NA NA10/14/10 22.83335.06NA NA NA08/29/12CNL CNL NA NA NA08/13/14 23.76334.13NA NA NA08/24/16 21.58336.31NA NA NAMW-19 400.18EMW-26 357.89MW-16 356.18MW-18 362.60MW-17 322.48MW-15D 368.42
Page 7 of 7Table 7: Groundwater Elevation DataDSCA ID No.: DC920017Groundwater Sampling PointSampling Date(mm/dd/yy)TOC Elevation[feet]Depth to Water[feet bgs]Groundwater Elevation[feet]Depth to NAPL[feet bgs]NAPL Thickness[feet]Corrected* Groundwater Elevation [feet]ADT 710/30/07 31.79325.13NA NA NA04/30/08 32.60324.32NA NA NA11/24/08NANANA NA NA06/04/09 33.38323.54NA NA NA08/24/09 33.31323.61NA NA NA04/08/10 33.41323.51NA NA NA10/14/10 32.97323.95NA NA NA08/29/12CNL CNL NA NA NA08/13/14 33.76323.16NA NA NA08/24/16 33.01323.91NA NA NA10/30/07 43.42315.78NA NA NA04/30/08 43.70315.50NA NA NA11/24/08NANANA NA NA06/04/09 44.16315.04NA NA NA08/24/09 44.02315.18NA NA NA04/08/10 43.81315.39NA NA NA10/14/10 43.49315.71NA NA NA08/29/12 44.07315.13NA NA NA08/13/14 44.06315.14NA NA NA08/24/16 43.82315.38NA NA NANotes:EMW-43 359.20EMW-40 356.921. NA denotes not available.2. NM denotes not measured.3. CNL denotes could not locate.
Page 1 of 14Table 8: Analytical Data for GroundwaterDSCA ID No.: DC920017Benzenecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneEthylbenzeneMethyl tert-butyl ether(MTBE)NaphthaleneTetrachloroethyleneToluenetrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneTrichloroethyleneVinyl chlorideXylenes (total)1,2-Dichloroethane(EDC)Chloroform1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneAcetoneBromodichloromethaneChloromethaneIsopropyl ether (IPE)Isopropylbenzene02/05/03NA NA NA NA NA0.23NA NA NA NA NA NA ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA02/10/06<0.0002 <0.001 <0.0001 <0.0003 <0.00040.14<0.0002 <0.0004 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0003 <0.0004 <0.001NA NA NA NA NA NA NA10/29/07<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.052<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0075<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001005/01/080.0031<0.0010.0110.00082J0.0079 0.00790.033<0.002 <0.002 <0.0020.051<0.0010.0075 0.0120.0025<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001011/25/08<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.084<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020<0.002 <0.0010.013<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.071<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.014<0.0010 <0.00100.019<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.089<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0040<0.0010 <0.00100.031<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001008/29/12<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0414<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0030 <0.00100.00143<0.0010 <0.0010<0.050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001008/28/14<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.005000.0499<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00200 <0.001000.00126<0.00100 <0.00100<0.0250<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00200 <0.0010009/07/16<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.00100.015<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.0015<0.000500.0012<0.00050 <0.000500.022<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.0005002/05/03NA NA NA NA NA0.20NA NA NA NA NA NANDNA NA NA NA NA NA NA02/10/06<0.0002<0.001<0.0001 <0.0003 <0.00040.159<0.0002 <0.0004<0.001 <0.001<0.0003 <0.0004<0.001NA NA NA NA NA NA NA11/14/06<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.058<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0016<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001010/29/07<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.031<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0038<0.0010 <0.0010<0.0100.00076 J<0.002<0.0010 <0.001005/01/08<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.013<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0071<0.0010 <0.0010<0.0100.0011<0.002<0.0010 <0.001011/25/08<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.023<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020<0.002 <0.0010.0076<0.0010 <0.0010<0.0100.00070 J<0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0078<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0058<0.0010 <0.00100.022<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0082<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0065<0.0010 <0.00100.046<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0080<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0046<0.0010 <0.00100.0058J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001002/05/03NA NA NA NA NA0.71NA NA NA NA NA NA ND NA NA NA NA NA NA NA02/10/06<0.001 <0.005 <0.005 <0.002 <0.0020.428<0.001 <0.002 <0.001 <0.005 <0.003 <0.002 <0.005NA NA NA NA NA NA NA11/04/06<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.22<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.00065J<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001010/29/07<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.17<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.00057J<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001005/01/08<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.15<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.00059J<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.16<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.022<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.15<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0016<0.0010 <0.00100.019<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.13 E<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0022<0.0010 <0.00100.0077J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001008/29/12<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0648<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0030 <0.00100.00237<0.0010 <0.0010<0.050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001008/28/14<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.005000.0292<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00200 <0.001000.00345<0.00100 <0.00100<0.0250<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00200 <0.0010009/07/16<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.00100.020<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.0015<0.000500.011<0.00050 <0.000500.012<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050MW-2MW-3MW-1Groundwater Sampling PointSampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[mg/L]ADT 8
Page 2 of 14Table 8: Analytical Data for GroundwaterDSCA ID No.: DC920017Benzenecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneEthylbenzeneMethyl tert-butyl ether(MTBE)NaphthaleneTetrachloroethyleneToluenetrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneTrichloroethyleneVinyl chlorideXylenes (total)1,2-Dichloroethane(EDC)Chloroform1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneAcetoneBromodichloromethaneChloromethaneIsopropyl ether (IPE)IsopropylbenzeneGroundwater Sampling PointSampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[mg/L]ADT 802/05/03NA NA NA NA NA0.039NA NA NA NA NA NA0.008NA NA NA NA NA NA NA02/10/06<0.0002<0.001<0.0001 <0.0003 <0.00040.014<0.0002 <0.0004<0.001 <0.001<0.0003 <0.00040.004NA NA NA NA NA NA NA11/14/06<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.0097<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.008<0.0010 <0.0010<0.0100.0012<0.002<0.0010 <0.001010/29/07<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.0057<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0026<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001005/01/08<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.0024<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0074<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001011/25/08<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020<0.002 <0.0010.0082<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0015<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0052<0.0010 <0.00100.023<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0013<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0040<0.0010 <0.00100.034<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0014<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0028<0.0010 <0.00100.0085J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001002/10/06<0.0002<0.001<0.0001 <0.0003 <0.00040.103<0.0002 <0.0004<0.001 <0.001<0.0003 <0.00040.002N/ANANANANANANA11/13/06<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.078<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0034<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001010/29/07<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.006<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.005<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001005/01/08<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.038<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0073<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001011/26/08<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.035<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020<0.002 <0.0010.0071<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0040<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0082<0.0010 <0.00100.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0050<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0053<0.0010 <0.00100.0057J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0027<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0038<0.0010 <0.00100.013<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001011/17/06<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001010/29/07<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001005/01/08<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.0021<0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001011/25/08<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020<0.002 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.015<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.0010MW-4MW-5MW-6
Page 3 of 14Table 8: Analytical Data for GroundwaterDSCA ID No.: DC920017Benzenecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneEthylbenzeneMethyl tert-butyl ether(MTBE)NaphthaleneTetrachloroethyleneToluenetrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneTrichloroethyleneVinyl chlorideXylenes (total)1,2-Dichloroethane(EDC)Chloroform1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneAcetoneBromodichloromethaneChloromethaneIsopropyl ether (IPE)IsopropylbenzeneGroundwater Sampling PointSampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[mg/L]ADT 811/20/06<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001010/29/07<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001005/02/08<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001011/24/08<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020<0.002 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.016<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0057J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0061J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001011/17/06<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.19<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0016<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001010/29/07<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.028<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.001<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001005/02/08<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.13<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0016<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001011/25/08<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.140<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020<0.002 <0.0010.0016<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.091<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0017<0.0010 <0.00100.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.11<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0033<0.0010 <0.00100.0079J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.041<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0032<0.0010 <0.00100.013<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001008/28/14<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.005000.00903<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00200 <0.001000.00288<0.00100 <0.00100<0.0250<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00200 <0.0010009/07/16<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.00100.011<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.0015<0.000500.0023<0.00050 <0.000500.0053<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.0005011/02/07<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.16<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0011NA NA NA NA NA NA NA05/02/08<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.11<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0011<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001011/25/08<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.100<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020<0.002 <0.0010.00095J<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.00100.00056 J<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.087<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.00093J<0.0010 <0.00100.012<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.00100.0017<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.075<0.0010 <0.00200.00053J<0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0014<0.0010 <0.00100.0077J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.033<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0013<0.0010 <0.00100.013<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001008/28/14<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.005000.00894<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00200 <0.001000.00355<0.00100 <0.00100<0.0250<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00200 <0.0010009/07/16<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.00100.0087<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.0015<0.000500.0039<0.00050 <0.000500.0057<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.0005011/13/06<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001010/29/07<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001005/02/08<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001011/24/08<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020<0.002 <0.0010.001<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0011<0.0010 <0.00100.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.00051J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0020<0.0010 <0.00100.0072J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0010<0.0010 <0.00100.0058J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.0010MW-7MW-9MW-8MW-8D
Page 4 of 14Table 8: Analytical Data for GroundwaterDSCA ID No.: DC920017Benzenecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneEthylbenzeneMethyl tert-butyl ether(MTBE)NaphthaleneTetrachloroethyleneToluenetrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneTrichloroethyleneVinyl chlorideXylenes (total)1,2-Dichloroethane(EDC)Chloroform1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneAcetoneBromodichloromethaneChloromethaneIsopropyl ether (IPE)IsopropylbenzeneGroundwater Sampling PointSampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[mg/L]ADT 811/17/06<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.0071<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 NA <0.0010.00067 J<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001010/29/07<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.028<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001005/01/08<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.037<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001011/25/08<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.026<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020<0.002 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.012<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.00081J<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0085<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0021<0.0010 <0.00100.0077J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0034<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0024<0.0010 <0.00100.023<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001011/02/07<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.00170.00054J<0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.00059JNA NA NA NA NA NA NA05/01/08<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.003<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.001 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001011/26/08<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0026<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020<0.002 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0026<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0085 J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0025<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0051J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.028<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001011/02/07<0.0010.0024<0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.30.0036<0.0020.0019J<0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0018NA NA NA NA NA NA NA04/30/08<0.0010.0018<0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.26<0.001 <0.0020.0017J<0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0019<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.00100.0019<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.14<0.0010 <0.00200.0019J<0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0024<0.0010 <0.00100.0086 J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.00100.0021<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.15<0.0010 <0.00200.0019J<0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0022<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.00100.0019<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.060<0.0010 <0.00200.0014J<0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0020<0.0010 <0.00100.0056J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001011/02/07<0.0010.0069<0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.160<0.001 <0.0020.0043<0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0020NA NA NA NA NA NA NA05/02/08<0.0010.0059<0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.60<0.0010.00052 J0.0049<0.002 <0.001 <0.0010.0024<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001011/25/08<0.00100.0073<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.72<0.0010 <0.00200.0057<0.0020<0.002 <0.0010.0024<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.0100.0058 J<0.010 <0.010 <0.0100.74<0.010 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020<0.0030<0.010 <0.020 <0.010 <0.010 <0.100 <0.010 <0.020 <0.010 <0.01004/23/10<0.00100.0045<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.59<0.0010 <0.00200.0042<0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0026<0.0010 <0.00100.0054J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.00100.0038<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.27<0.0010 <0.00200.0034<0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0024<0.0010 <0.00100.013<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001008/29/12<0.00100.00236<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.466<0.0010 <0.00100.00349<0.0010 <0.0030 <0.00100.00177<0.0010 <0.0010<0.050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001008/28/14<0.001000.00241<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.005000.123<0.00100 <0.001000.00218<0.00100 <0.00200 <0.001000.00174<0.00100 <0.00100<0.0250<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00200 <0.0010009/07/16<0.000500.0017<0.00050 <0.00050<0.00100.21<0.00050 <0.000500.0020<0.00050<0.0015<0.000500.0019<0.00050 <0.000500.0068<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050MW-13MW-12MW-10MW-11
Page 5 of 14Table 8: Analytical Data for GroundwaterDSCA ID No.: DC920017Benzenecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneEthylbenzeneMethyl tert-butyl ether(MTBE)NaphthaleneTetrachloroethyleneToluenetrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneTrichloroethyleneVinyl chlorideXylenes (total)1,2-Dichloroethane(EDC)Chloroform1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneAcetoneBromodichloromethaneChloromethaneIsopropyl ether (IPE)IsopropylbenzeneGroundwater Sampling PointSampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[mg/L]ADT 811/02/07<0.0010.0068<0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.18<0.001 <0.0020.0046<0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0020NA NA NA NA NA NA NA05/02/08<0.0010.0011<0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.14<0.001 <0.0020.0016J<0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0020<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001011/25/08<0.00100.0012<0.00100.0011<0.00100.16<0.0010 <0.00200.0012J<0.0020<0.002 <0.0010.0022<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.00100.00091 J<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.18<0.0010 <0.00200.00072 J<0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0028<0.0010 <0.00100.0087 J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/23/10<0.00100.00079J<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.16<0.0010 <0.00200.00070J<0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0031<0.0010 <0.00100.0055J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.00100.00055J<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.085<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0029<0.0010 <0.00100.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001008/29/12<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.130<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0030 <0.00100.00208<0.0010 <0.0010<0.050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001008/28/14<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.005000.0456<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00200 <0.001000.00238<0.00100 <0.00100<0.0250<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00200 <0.0010009/07/16<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.00100.067<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.0015<0.000500.0023<0.00050 <0.000500.0064<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.0005011/02/07<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.00310.00072J<0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0011NA NA NA NA NA NA NA05/01/08<0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.0010.0053<0.001 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0013<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001011/25/08<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0040<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020<0.002 <0.0010.0014<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0023<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0012<0.0010 <0.00100.0066 J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0020<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0016<0.0010 <0.00100.0085J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.00076J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.00069J<0.0010 <0.00100.012<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001009/12/12<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.00277<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0030 <0.00100.0015<0.0010 <0.0010<0.050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001009/07/16<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.00100.00069<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.0015<0.000500.0015<0.00050 <0.000500.0070<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.0005011/02/07<0.0010.00058J<0.0010.0013<0.0010.10<0.001 <0.0020.00081J<0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0014NA NA NA NA NA NA NA05/01/08<0.0010.0088 J<0.0010.0014<0.0010.17<0.001 <0.0020.0014J<0.002 <0.002 <0.0010.0016<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010<0.002<0.0010 <0.001011/26/08<0.00100.0023<0.00100.0016<0.00100.21<0.0010 <0.00200.0014J<0.0020<0.002 <0.0010.0019<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001006/17/09<0.00100.061<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.017<0.0010 <0.00200.0029<0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0008J<0.0010 <0.00100.0073 J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.00100.0097<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.11<0.0010 <0.00200.0031<0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0033<0.0010 <0.00100.013<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.00100.0059<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.036<0.0010 <0.00200.0015J<0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0016<0.0010 <0.00100.020<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001009/12/12<0.00100.00169<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.150<0.0010 <0.00100.00140<0.0010 <0.0030 <0.00100.00142<0.0010 <0.0010<0.050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001008/28/14<0.001000.00200<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.005000.0216<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00200 <0.001000.00111<0.00100 <0.00100<0.0250<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00200 <0.0010009/07/16<0.000500.0087<0.00050 <0.00050<0.00100.051<0.00050 <0.000500.0015<0.00050<0.0015<0.000500.0018<0.00050 <0.000500.0068<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.0005008/24/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0064 J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.010<0.00100.0024<0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.013<0.0010<0.0020<0.0010 <0.001008/29/12<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001008/28/14<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00500 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100<0.0020<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100<0.0250<0.00100 <0.00100<0.0020<0.0010009/07/16<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.0010<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.0015<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.000500.0074<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050MW-13DMW-14MW-15DMW-15
Page 6 of 14Table 8: Analytical Data for GroundwaterDSCA ID No.: DC920017Benzenecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneEthylbenzeneMethyl tert-butyl ether(MTBE)NaphthaleneTetrachloroethyleneToluenetrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneTrichloroethyleneVinyl chlorideXylenes (total)1,2-Dichloroethane(EDC)Chloroform1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneAcetoneBromodichloromethaneChloromethaneIsopropyl ether (IPE)IsopropylbenzeneGroundwater Sampling PointSampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[mg/L]ADT 808/24/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0007J0.00075J<0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.00079J<0.0010 <0.00100.0089 J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0071<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.00056J<0.0010 <0.00100.0077 J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0072<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0058J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001009/12/12<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0030 <0.00100.00185<0.0010 <0.0010<0.050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001008/28/14<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.005000.00245<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100<0.0020<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100<0.0250<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00200 <0.0010009/07/16<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.00100.0039<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.0015<0.000500.0015<0.00050 <0.000500.0074<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050MW-17 (20')08/24/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.0010MW-17 (40')08/24/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.00058 J<0.0010 <0.00100.0056 J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010<0.0010<0.0010 <0.00100.0052J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010<0.0010<0.0010 <0.00100.0051J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001008/24/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.00087J<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.00073J<0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.00063J<0.0010 <0.00100.013<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001008/24/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0020<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.010<0.0010 <0.00100.0066 J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0069<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0079<0.0010 <0.00100.0077J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0042<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0030 <0.00100.0038<0.0010 <0.00100.0050J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0010 <0.001004/02/02BQL NA BQL BQL BQL0.050BQL NA BQL NA BQL NA BQL NA NA NA NA NA BQL NA02/02/04BQL NA BQL BQL BQL0.081BQL NA0.00102NA BQL NA BQL NA NA NA NA NA BQL NA01/17/05BQL NA BQL BQL BQL0.196BQL NA BQL NA BQL NA BQL NA NA NA NA NA BQL NA07/11/06BQL NA BQL BQL BQL0.238BQL NA BQL NA BQL NA BQL NA NA NA NA NA BQL NA08/24/07BQL NA BQL BQL BQL0.190BQL NA0.0021JNA BQL NA BQL NA NA NA NA NA BQL NA11/26/08<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.037<0.0010 <0.00200.00079 J<0.0020<0.002 <0.001<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.00100.02706/17/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.025<0.0010 <0.00200.00071 J<0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0098 J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.00100.02804/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.016<0.0010 <0.00200.00065 J<0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0070 J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.00100.007410/28/10<0.00100.00065J<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.029<0.0010 <0.00200.00077 J<0.0020 <0.0030 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.010<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.00100.0087MW-19EMW-26MW-17MW-18MW-16
Page 7 of 14Table 8: Analytical Data for GroundwaterDSCA ID No.: DC920017Benzenecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneEthylbenzeneMethyl tert-butyl ether(MTBE)NaphthaleneTetrachloroethyleneToluenetrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneTrichloroethyleneVinyl chlorideXylenes (total)1,2-Dichloroethane(EDC)Chloroform1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneAcetoneBromodichloromethaneChloromethaneIsopropyl ether (IPE)IsopropylbenzeneGroundwater Sampling PointSampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[mg/L]ADT 801/12/061.010NA BQL0.526 0.129NABQLNANANA1.286NA BQL0.09760.0792NA NA NA0.9550.0304J07/12/060.830NA BQL0.664 0.0512NABQLNANANA1.013NA BQL0.1580.0544NA NA NA0.7140.0256J01/03/070.686NA BQL0.820BQL NA BQL NA NA NA0.738NA BQL0.1130.0744NA NA NA0.562 0.093605/22/080.106NA BQL1.260BQL NA BQL NA NA NA0.0368JNA BQL BQL BQL NA NA NA0.4680.0144J11/19/080.044NA BQL1.560BQL NA BQL NA NA NA0.0176JNA BQL BQL BQL NA NA NA0.434BQL06/18/090.054<0.0010 <0.00100.63<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.00200.0180.007J<0.0010<0.010 <0.010 <0.100 <0.010<0.00200.40<0.01004/22/100.018<0.0010 <0.00100.710.00360.00092J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.00200.00623J0.0054<0.00100.0012<0.00100.011<0.0010 <0.00200.350.001410/28/100.022<0.010 <0.0100.51<0.010 <0.010 <0.010<0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020<0.030 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.10 <0.010 <0.0200.27<0.01006/17/09<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.042<0.00100.022<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0021 <0.0020 <0.00300.0018 0.0022<0.0010 <0.00100.012<0.0010 <0.00200.026<0.001004/22/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.053<0.00100.034<0.0010 <0.00200.00082 J<0.0020 <0.00300.0014 0.0015<0.0010 <0.00100.0098 J<0.0010 <0.00200.027<0.001010/28/10<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.023<0.00100.016<0.0010 <0.00200.00069 J<0.0020 <0.00300.00098J0.0016<0.0010 <0.00100.0062 J<0.0010 <0.00200.015<0.00100.001 0.07 0.003 0.02 0.004 0.0007 0.6 0.076 0.001 0.00003 0.0940.00040.00073 0.0058 0.4 60.00060.003 0.07 0.07EMW-43Notes: 1. Bold values exceed DSCA Tier 1 RBSL (or NC 2L groundwater standard, if RBSL not established).2. J = estimated value between laboratory reporting limit and method detection limit; E = estimated concentration above calibration limit; NE = not established; BQL = below quantitation limit.3. EMW monitoring wells are associated with the Exxon site. Additional data may be available for these wells. Some EMW data was obtained from Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc.4. Samples in 6/09, 4/10, 11/10, 8/12, and 8/14 were collected using passive diffusion bags (PDBs).DSCA Tier 1 RBSL(or NC 2L Standard)EMW-40
Page 8 of 14Table 8(1): Analytical Data for Groundwater (User Specified Chemicals)DSCA ID No.: DC920017Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)n-Propylbenzenep-Isopropyltoluenesec-ButylbenzeneTrichlorofluoromethaneDichlorodifluoromethane02/05/03NA NA NA NA NA NA02/10/06NA NA NA NA NA NA10/29/07<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA05/01/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA11/25/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002<0.002006/17/09 0.23<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002009/12/12<0.050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001008/28/14<0.0500<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.0010009/07/16<0.0050<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.001002/05/03NA NA NA NA NA NA02/10/06NA NA NA NA NA NA11/14/06<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA10/29/07<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA05/01/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA11/25/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002006/17/09 0.23<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002002/05/03NA NA NA NA NA NA02/10/06NA NA NA NA NA NA11/04/06<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA10/29/07<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA05/01/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA06/17/09 0.210<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002009/12/12<0.050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001008/28/14<0.0500<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.0010009/07/16<0.0050<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.0010MW-2MW-3MW-1Sampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[mg/L]Groundwater Sampling PointADT 8(1)
Page 9 of 14Table 8(1): Analytical Data for Groundwater (User Specified Chemicals)DSCA ID No.: DC920017Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)n-Propylbenzenep-Isopropyltoluenesec-ButylbenzeneTrichlorofluoromethaneDichlorodifluoromethaneSampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[mg/L]Groundwater Sampling PointADT 8(1)02/05/03NA NA NA NA NA NA02/10/06NA NA NA NA NA NA11/14/06<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA10/29/07<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA05/01/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA11/25/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002006/17/09 0.200<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002002/10/06NA NA NA NA NA NA11/13/06<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA10/29/07<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA05/01/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA11/26/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002006/17/09<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/10 0.0073<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002011/17/06<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA10/29/07<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA05/01/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA11/25/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002006/17/09<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/10 0.0067<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020MW-4MW-5MW-6
Page 10 of 14Table 8(1): Analytical Data for Groundwater (User Specified Chemicals)DSCA ID No.: DC920017Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)n-Propylbenzenep-Isopropyltoluenesec-ButylbenzeneTrichlorofluoromethaneDichlorodifluoromethaneSampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[mg/L]Groundwater Sampling PointADT 8(1)11/20/06<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA10/29/07<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA05/02/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA11/24/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002006/17/09<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/10 0.0052<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002011/17/06<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA10/29/07<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA05/02/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA11/25/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002006/17/09<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/10 0.0052<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002008/28/14<0.0500<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.0010009/07/16<0.0050<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.001011/02/07NA NA NA NA NA NA05/02/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA11/25/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002006/17/09<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/10 0.0065<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002008/28/14<0.0500<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.0010009/07/16<0.0050<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.001011/13/06<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA10/29/07<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA05/02/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA11/24/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002006/17/09<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/100.0043J<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020MW-7MW-9MW-8MW-8D
Page 11 of 14Table 8(1): Analytical Data for Groundwater (User Specified Chemicals)DSCA ID No.: DC920017Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)n-Propylbenzenep-Isopropyltoluenesec-ButylbenzeneTrichlorofluoromethaneDichlorodifluoromethaneSampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[mg/L]Groundwater Sampling PointADT 8(1)11/17/06<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA10/29/07<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA05/01/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA11/25/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002006/17/09<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/10 0.011<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002011/02/07NA NA NA NA NA NA05/01/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA11/26/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002006/17/09<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/10 0.017<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002011/2/07NA NA NA NA NA NA4/30/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA06/17/09<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/10 0.0052<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002011/02/07NA NA NA NA NA NA05/02/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA11/25/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002006/17/09<0.050 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.020 <0.02004/23/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/10 0.0069<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002009/12/12<0.050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001008/28/14<0.0500<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.001000.0010309/07/16<0.0050<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.0010MW-13MW-10MW-11MW-12
Page 12 of 14Table 8(1): Analytical Data for Groundwater (User Specified Chemicals)DSCA ID No.: DC920017Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)n-Propylbenzenep-Isopropyltoluenesec-ButylbenzeneTrichlorofluoromethaneDichlorodifluoromethaneSampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[mg/L]Groundwater Sampling PointADT 8(1)11/02/07NA NA NA NA NA NA05/02/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA11/25/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002006/17/09<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/23/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/10 0.011<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002009/12/12<0.050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001008/28/14<0.0500<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.0010009/07/16<0.0050<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.001011/02/07NA NA NA NA NA NA05/01/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010<0.002 NA11/25/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002006/17/09<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/100.0026J<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.005010/28/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002009/12/12<0.050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001009/07/16<0.0050<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.001011/02/07NA NA NA NA NA NA05/01/08<0.0050 <0.00100.0051<0.0010<0.002 NA11/26/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002006/17/09<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.005010/28/10 0.0093<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.00200912/12<0.050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001008/28/14<0.0500<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.001000.0056209/07/16<0.0050<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.001008/24/090.0024 J<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/100.0027J<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.005010/28/10 0.0068<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002009/12/12<0.050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.001008/28/14<0.0500<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.0010009/07/16<0.0050<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050<0.0010MW-13DMW-14MW-15MW-15D
Page 13 of 14Table 8(1): Analytical Data for Groundwater (User Specified Chemicals)DSCA ID No.: DC920017Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)n-Propylbenzenep-Isopropyltoluenesec-ButylbenzeneTrichlorofluoromethaneDichlorodifluoromethaneSampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[mg/L]Groundwater Sampling PointADT 8(1)08/24/090.0029 J<0.00100.00086 J<0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.022<0.002010/28/10 0.0053<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0078<0.002009/12/12<0.050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.00100.0353<0.001008/28/14<0.0500<0.00100 <0.00100 <0.001000.00199<0.0010009/07/16<0.0050<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.000500.0043<0.0010MW-17 (20')08/24/09<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020MW-17 (40')08/24/090.0021 J<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/100.0039J<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002008/24/090.0021 J<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/10 0.0068<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002008/24/09<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/10 0.0050<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/02/02NA NA NA NA NA NA02/02/04NA NA NA NA NA NA01/17/05NA NA NA NA NA NA07/11/06NA NA NA NA NA NA08/24/07NA NA NA NA NA NA11/26/08<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002006/17/09<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/10 0.0053<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.0020MW-17MW-18MW-19EMW-26MW-16
Page 14 of 14Table 8(1): Analytical Data for Groundwater (User Specified Chemicals)DSCA ID No.: DC920017Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)n-Propylbenzenep-Isopropyltoluenesec-ButylbenzeneTrichlorofluoromethaneDichlorodifluoromethaneSampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[mg/L]Groundwater Sampling PointADT 8(1)01/12/06NA NA NA NA BQL NA07/12/06NA NA NA NA BQL NA01/03/07NA NA NA NA BQL NA05/22/08NA NA NA NA BQL NA11/19/08NA NA NA NA BQL NA06/18/09<0.050 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010<0.0020<0.02004/22/100.0024J<0.0010 <0.00100.00098J<0.0020 <0.005010/28/10<0.050 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.020 <0.02006/17/09<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002004/22/10<0.0050 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.002010/28/100.0043J<0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0020 <0.00204 0.07 0.025 0.07 0.07 1Notes: 1. Bold values exceed DSCA Tier 1 RBSL (or NC 2L groundwater standard, if RBSL not established).2. J = estimated value between laboratory reporting limit and method detection limit; E = estimated concentration above calibration limit; NE = not established; BQL = below quantitation limit.3. EMW monitoring wells are associated with the Exxon site. Additional data may be available for these wells. Some EMW data was obtained from Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc.4. Samples in 6/09, 4/10, 11/10, 8/12, and 8/14 were collected using passive diffusion bags (PDBs).EMW-40EMW-43DSCA Tier 1 RBSL(or NC 2L Standard)
Appendix E
Interviews

RECORD OF CONVERSATION ( ) MEETING (X)

Date: October 10, 2019 Job Name /#: T19-4079 North Hills NHX
Redevelopment
Recorded By: Christopher Davis Owner / Client: JP Morgan
Talked With: David Parker Of: Kane Realty
Position: Construction
Manager
Phone: [phone]

Main Subject: On-site Interview

Targus interviewed Mr. David Parker, Construction Manager for the subject property. Mr. Parker
indicated that he had been associated with the subject property for approximately the past
seventeen years. The owner was identified by Mr. Parker as Kane Realty. Mr. Parker stated that
he had good knowledge of the uses and physical characteristics of the subject property and is,
therefore, considered the Key Site Manager.

According to Mr. Parker, he was not aware of information regarding environmental liens, AULs,
or governmental notification relating to past or recurrent violations of environmental laws with
respect to the subject property. Targus inquired whether the Key Site Manager was aware of:
(1) any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum
products in, on, or from the property; (2) any pending, threatened, or past administrative
proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the subject
property; or (3) any notices from governmental entities regarding possible violations of
environmental laws or possible liabilities relating to hazardous substances or petroleum
products. Mr. Parker replied that he was not aware of litigation, proceedings, or notices of these
types.

RECORD OF CONVERSATION (X) MEETING ()
TARGUS PROJECT NO.: T19-4079 CONTACT: Shirley Liggins
DATE: October 22, 2019 COMPANY: North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality’s Brownfields Program
TIME: 1445 TITLE: Program Administrative Assistant
TARGUS CONTACT: Tommy Kim PHONE: [phone]

CONCERNING: Case Status

The subject property was identified on the Brownfields’ database. Ms. Liggins stated that they received a Letter of
Intent to enter the Brownfields program back in June 2003. However, the project never progressed. There are no
ongoing efforts or requirements from the agency.

1
Tommy Kim
From:Cunningham, Mike <[e-mail]>
Sent:Thursday, October 24, 2019 3:11 PM
To:Tommy Kim
Subject:RE: [External] Brothers Cleaners Status
Mr. Kim, 

I wasn’t saying the solvent plume doesn’t extend onto the subject property your client is interested in (that you outlined 
in red) – it does. I was just saying that the concentrations are pretty low on the property your client is interested in I 
don’t think it extends over the area across Lassiter Mill and even if it did the concentrations are low enough (and also 
the soil gas concentrations) that it doesn’t warrant further VI investigation across Lassiter Mill to the west of the 
property your client is interested in. 

Thanks, 

Mike 

https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/waste‐management/dry‐cleaning‐solvent‐cleanup‐act‐program 

From: Tommy Kim [mailto:[e-mail]]  
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 4:01 PM 
To: Cunningham, Mike <[e-mail]> 
Cc: Genna Olson ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]> 
Subject: RE: [External] Brothers Cleaners Status  

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to 
[e-mail] 

Good afternoon Mr. Cunningham,  

Thank you for the response. It is very helpful.  I am a bit confused on your second point below. The latest available 
groundwater report that I downloaded from the DEQ website was from 2016. You mentioned below that the 
groundwater plume doesn’t extend to our subject property; however, MW‐13/13D and MW‐15 still have exceedances of 
PCE in groundwater.   Is there more recent groundwater data that you are referring to? OR, are you saying there’s isn’t a 
plume based on the soil gas data. The seven vapor points that we have on‐site did not have exceedances of PCE, TCE or 
VC.  I attached the concentration maps that I am looking at for reference.  I added red boxes around the on‐site points 
for reference.   

2
Sorry in advance for the questions. We are just trying to have something to demonstrate and explain to our client about 
the GW and vapor conditions. 

Sincerely,  

Tommy R. Kim - Targus Associates, LLC
O: 972-247-7229 / F: 972-499-9242 / M: 325-669-2024

PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. 

From: Cunningham, Mike <[e-mail]>  
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 7:25 AM 
To: Tommy Kim <[e-mail]> 
Cc: Genna Olson ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]> 
Subject: RE: [External] Brothers Cleaners Status  

Mr. Kim, 

I’m the project manager for the Brothers Cleaners site in Raleigh, so I’ll be happy to answer your questions about the 
site. 

1. The site is now considered to be fully assessed. We have not identified any significant or current risks that need 
to be addressed. We had hoped that we might be able to close the site out and issue a ‘no further action’ status 
for it, however that is looking highly unlikely at this point due to an offsite soil vapor data point to the north of 
the site (SVMP‐8). The City of Raleigh Fire Station property has the SVMP‐8 soil gas point that exceeds the 
acceptable concentration for residential use. We tested indoor air in the fire station and it is OK. However, 
under our risk based rules we need to account for current and future risk for onsite and offsite properties and as 
such we would need to get the city to voluntarily agree to a land use restriction on the fire station property. We 
asked the city about this and it appears that they are not amenable to signing any land use restrictions for that 
property. Since the site can’t close out, we’ll periodically (most likely every three to four years) check the 
groundwater at some of the monitoring wells and check their condition. 
2. We didn’t do any vapor intrusion testing across Lassiter Mill Rd. since the groundwater plume doesn’t extend 
over there, and based on the soil vapor testing that we’ve done on the North Hills Mall property it doesn’t 
appear to be a concern or pose any risks over there. 
3. Since the property isn’t closed out, we have not imposed any land use restrictions on the subject property that 
you are looking into. It doesn’t appear that vapor intrusion would be a concern for commercial use based on the 
groundwater and soil gas concentrations. Based on the soil gas points SVMP‐16, 17 and 18, it does appear that 
there could be a potential concern for residential development on the north portion of the subject property. 
There isn’t any soil contamination on the subject property you are looking at that we are aware of, and if there 
is it wouldn’t be related to the Brothers Cleaners. The only other concern would be use of groundwater. North 
Carolina regulations prohibit installing a water supply well in an area of known groundwater contamination. 
Also, we would like to have the monitoring wells on the subject property preserved if possible, or if not, properly 
abandoned in accordance w/ NC regulations. 

I hope this helps and please let me know if you have any further questions or need any further information. 

Thanks, 

Mike 

3

https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/waste‐management/dry‐cleaning‐solvent‐cleanup‐act‐program 

From: Tommy Kim [mailto:[e-mail]]  
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 5:26 PM 
To: Cunningham, Mike <[e-mail]> 
Subject: [External] Brothers Cleaners Status  

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to 
[e-mail] 

Good afternoon Mr. Cunningham,  

My company is currently working on the Phase I ESA for the site North Hills Mall in Raleigh, NC.  I left you a voicemail but 
also wanted to email you in case email communication is easier for you.  I found your name on recent assessment 
reports that were submitted to NCDEQ.  Our regulatory research identified a chlorinated plume underneath the mall and 
surrounding areas that originated from the former Brothers Cleaners (DSCA ID. No. DC920017).   

Attached are the vapor and GW concentration maps for reference. I also attached map depicting the location of our 
subject property in relation to the former drycleaner.  Based on the information that we reviewed from the NCDEQ 
website, we had some additional questions (below).  Any feedback that you could provide would be helpful and greatly 
appreciated.   

 What is the latest status on this case?  
 Has there already been vapor intrusion assessment performed for the mall area on the south/east side of 
Lassiter Mill Road?  
 If the subject property was to be redeveloped, would the NCDEQ have any requirements with respect to soil, 
groundwater, or vapor?  

Thank you in advance for your time and assistance.  

Sincerely,

Tommy R. Kim
Project Professional
1900 Diplomat Drive
Dallas, Texas 75234
1900 Diplomat Drive
Dallas, TX 75234
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email Transmission
To: John McGrath From: Christopher Davis
Company: Raleigh FD Project: T19-4079 North Hills NHX
Redevelopment
Email: [e-mail] Date: 10-7-2019
Phone: [phone] Pages: 1
Re: CC:
 Urgent  For Review  Please Comment  Please Reply  Please Recycle
Targus is currently performing a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment at the following addresses:
4321 Lassiter at North Hills Ave
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609

122 Mary Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Your assistance and file information for this address is requested to identify potential sources of
environmental concern that may have occurred. Such information may consist of fuel or chemical
storage activities, drycleaner information, compliance and inspection reports, septic system,
drainage and water quality, environmental enforcement activities, brownfields, underground
storage tanks, wells, solid waste, permitting, emergency responses to fires, hazardous material
responses, spills, and/or releases or observations noted during routine fire inspections.

We appreciate your help with this project. Please contact Christopher Davis by telephone at [phone] or via email at [e-mail] or facsimile at [phone] with
any questions or comments regarding this inquiry. Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,
Targus Associates, LLC

Christopher Davis
Staff Professional

From:FirePrevention
To:Chris Davis
Subject:RE: Open Records Request
Date:Tuesday, October 08, 2019 5:56:36 AM
Thank you for contacting Raleigh Fire Prevention and Administration:

Due to the amount of requests regarding Property Condition Assessment, Environmental
Assessment or Site Assessments, the Raleigh Fire Marshal’s Office has made all public record reports
available on our website free of charge. Please visit www.rfdreports.net for Fire Inspection Reports
and Fire/Incident Reports. Fire code violations & incident reports that are public record are available
however this does not include EMS or investigation reports. This website updates overnight. If you
experience problems with the website, please contact us during normal business hours.

Please note the website navigation requires input of the street name without “Road”, “Street”,
“Drive”, etc. and streets must be spelled correctly.
Example: Prefix/Abbreviations:
• West Martin
• W Martin
• Martin
Example: With/without spaces
• Boldleaf
• Bold leaf

Due to record retention policies not all records will be available. For older records that may be
archived please see below:

The Records Management Unit is responsible for assisting City Planning and Development Services
with public records requests. For due diligence requests, property assessments, and zoning code
violations please contact Records Administrator. Public records requests must include: Requestor
name, Company Name, Address, Phone Number, Email Address and Request Descriptions. This
information must be included with all requests. Please include as much detail as possible to help
assure the completeness and accuracy of the City's response. The complexity of the request and the
amount of City resources required to fulfill the request will determine the amount of time needed to
compile the response. Simple requests usually take six or fewer work days to fulfill.
Email   [e-mail]

The City of Raleigh has building permits and Certificates of Occupancy going back to 2000. They are
available through the City of Raleigh Online Development Center. Website
https://energovcitizenaccess.tylertech.com/RaleighNC/SelfService#/search

Thank you,
Raleigh Fire Prevention
http://www.raleighnc.gov/fire

From: Chris Davis <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2019 4:40 PM
To: FirePrevention <[e-mail]>
Subject: Open Records Request

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
verify that the attachment and content are safe. If you believe this email is suspicious, please click the 'Phish Alert'
link in the banner to report this message.

Good Afternoon Mr. McGrath,

Please see the attached open records request.

Thank you in advance for your time and effort,

/
Email
[e-mail]
Name
Christopher Davis
Phone
[phone]
Street Address
If you are a human, ignore this eld
REQUEST A PUBLIC RECORD
Documents, photos, emails, videos, data and other records.
YOUR INFORMATION
 Everything in this request box will be displayed publicly if the agency makes your request
public.

Targus is currently performing a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment at the following
addresses:
4321 Lassiter at North Hills Ave
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609

122 Mary Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609

Your assistance and file information for this address is requested to identify potential
sources of environmental concern that may have occurred. Such information may 
Select a department (optional)
/
1900 Dipolmat Drive
City
Dallas
State
Texas
Zip
75234
Company
Targus Associates
* Indicates required eld
Cancel
Wake County is committed to fullling public records requests as promptly as possible.
However, because of a large volume of requests received by the county and our legal
obligation to protect condential information, it often takes time to identify the responsive
records.
To avoid unnecessary delay in processing your request, please be as specic as possible
about the records you are requesting. If a request is vague or overly broad, (e.g. “all
documents” on a topic, “all emails” for multiple people or not including a specic timeframe),
it will take longer to identify and collect potentially responsive records.
Tips:
A valid email address is required in order to access your request.
Don't include personal information, like your social security number in your request
If you don't know the name of the record, describe the information you believe is
contained in it.
Be specic about what you need. Including names, dates, keywords or other details that
can help expedite the processing of your request.
Understand that requests are processed in the order they are received.
Let us know (mailto:[e-mail]) if you have questions.
Make Request
1900 Diplomat Drive
Dallas, TX 75234
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email Transmission
To: Rick Bolich From: Christopher Davis
Company: NCDEQ Project: T19-4079 North Hills NHX
Redevelopment
Email: [e-mail] Date: 10-7-2019
Phone: [phone] Pages: 1
Re: CC:
 Urgent  For Review  Please Comment  Please Reply  Please Recycle
Targus is currently performing a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment at the following addresses:
4321 Lassiter at North Hills Ave
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609

122 Mary Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Additionally Targus is interested in any files pertaining to the following addresses:

4359 Six Forks Rd, Raleigh, NC 27609

4221 Six Forks Rd, Raleigh, NC 27609
Your assistance and file information for this address is requested to identify potential sources of environmental concern that may have occurred. Such information may consist of fuel or chemical storage activities, drycleaner information, compliance and inspection reports, septic system,
drainage and water quality, environmental enforcement activities, brownfields, underground
storage tanks, wells, solid waste, permitting, emergency responses to fires, hazardous material
responses, spills, and/or releases or observations noted during routine fire inspections.

We appreciate your help with this project. Please contact Christopher Davis by telephone at (972)
247-7229 or via email at [e-mail] or facsimile at [phone] with
any questions or comments regarding this inquiry. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Targus Associates, LLC

Appendix F
Qualifications of Environmental Professionals
CHRISTOPHER DAVIS
Staff Professional

EDUCATION
Bachelors Environmental Studies: Natural Resource Management, Baylor University, August 2017

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS, AND TRAINING

FEMA Incident Command System -100
FEMA IS-700
Certified Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Operations
(HAZWOPER)

CAREER SUMMARY
Mr. Davis entered the environmental field in October 2017, in pursuit of a career as an environmental
professional at Alpha Testing, Inc. While at Alpha Testing he assisted and performed multiple Phase I
Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments. He joined Targus
Associates in February of 2019. He has also compiled data related to lead (Pb) exposure while at Baylor
University.

REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS: Mr. Davis has performed assessments of various
properties including vacant/undeveloped land, office buildings, multifamily properties, and commercial/
retail facilities. Responsibilities have included reviewing regulatory data, regulatory agency interaction,
additional services relating to historical impact, drinking water quality, endangered species, wetlands,
environmental impacts, project coordination, preparation and oversight of report and appendix materials,
and client and contractor relations.

Some of Mr. Davis’ previous projects have included multi-tenant commercial office buildings, historic
commercial properties, medical office buildings, and auto parts and repair shops.

PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS: Mr. Davis has been involved with multiple Phase II
Environmental Site Assessments on properties that have been identified as potentially impacted by adverse
environmental conditions, including dry cleaning solvents and other volatile organic compounds, metals,
and petroleum hydrocarbons. These projects included the collection of soil, groundwater, and soil vapor
samples from the identified sites for laboratory analyses, technical oversight of remediation, cleanup,
excavation and backfill activities, and comparison of laboratory data to regulatory action limits.

SOIL REMEDIATION OVERSIGHT: Mr. Davis has been involved in soil remediation oversight of properties
contaminated with PCE. This work involved the removal of existing slab, excavation of contaminated soil
and the mixing of contaminated soil with agricultural lime and recompacting of that soil. This work also
included the sampling of soil and groundwater.

TOMMY R. KIM
Project Environmental Professional

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Biology, University of California
Executive MBA Candidate, Baylor University

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS, CERTIFICATION AND TRAINING
OSHA 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Operations / Annual 8-hr Hazardous Waste Operations
Texas Licensed Asbestos Inspector – No. 602776
ASTM 1527-13 Environmental Professional

CAREER SUMMARY
Mr. Kim has more than ten years of experience in environmental consulting. Mr. Kim has performed
Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) on nationwide properties including Voluntary Cleanup
Program, Leaking Petroleum Storage Tank, Corrective Action, and Enforcement sites. The assessments
were completed for private equity, commercial lenders, legal, healthcare, and other institutional clients
such as insurers and financiers. Mr. Kim also participated in risk-based investigation (e.g. Phase II
investigations, sediment sampling, etc.) and remediation projects (e.g., source area removal, waste
dispositions, radon mitigation, etc.).

REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS: Mr. Kim has performed Phase I ESAs on various
properties including automotive repair shops, downtown high-rise developments, service stations, dry
cleaners, golf courses, retail shopping centers, vacant land, industrial facilities, and multifamily
developments. Additionally, Mr. Kim managed multi-site portfolios for state right-of-way property
acquisition projects. The assessments included performance of environmental historical research;
regulatory records review at local, state and federal agencies; data evaluation; geological and
hydrogeological analyses; limited asbestos surveys; wetlands evaluation; radon assessment; cultural
resources review; endangered species review; and lead-in-drinking water testing.

SITE CONTAMINATION/ REMEDIATION ASSESSMENT: Mr. Kim has conducted subsurface
investigations which included the installation of soil borings/ monitoring wells to evaluate the potential
presence, source, magnitude, and extent of petroleum hydrocarbon and/ or hazardous substances
contamination in surface soil, subsurface soil, and groundwater at various properties. In addition, Mr. Kim
performed oversight and managed remediation activities that included source area excavation,
confirmation sampling, waste characterization, and barrier-based treatment of soil/groundwater utilizing
the Regenesis products Oxygen Release Compound Advanced (ORC-A®) and Hydrogen Release
Compound (HRC®).

RADON MITIGATION: Mr. Kim provided project management and oversight of radon mitigation activities
for a mid-rise apartment complex. Activities included conducting diagnostic tests in to evaluate sub-slab
vacuum and varying radial distances from an extraction point. Subsequent to the diagnostic testing, sub-
slab depressurization systems (SSDSs) were installed in select units. Prior to drilling the extraction points
in the interior of the units, a ground penetrating radar (GPR) was utilized to survey each area for post-
tension cables. Once the SSDS installations were complete, follow-up long-term tests (approximately 90
days) were conducted utilizing Alpha Track samplers to confirm the effectiveness of the SSDSs and that
radon levels were below the EPA action level of 4.0 pCi/L.

BRITT BLAYLOCK Principal Environmental Professional

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science in Rangeland Ecology & Management, Texas A&M University, 1995 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND TRAINING
Environmental Professional – U.S. EPA All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) Rule (40 CFR § 312.20) OSHA 40-Hour HAZWOPER Certified
CAREER SUMMARY
Mr. Blaylock has 23 years of experience in environmental science and consulting. He began his career performing emergency response for hazardous material incidents. Since, he has completed/managed numerous assessments in 30-plus states. These projects have been conducted for commercial, legal, lending, and other institutional clients. Services have included Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), Phase II subsurface assessments, UST removals, and remediation project planning and implementation. Mr. Blaylock’s experience also includes asbestos surveys, NEPA investigations, and multifamily property assessments per the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Multifamily Accelerated Processing guidelines. Additional duties include training and supervision of staff and development of client relationships. Project management skills and client relations associated with the above activities have led to the successful completion of multi-site and multi-tasked portfolios across the United States.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
Institutional Investment, Nationwide – Successfully managed the completion of multiple portfolios of commercial, light industrial, and multifamily residential properties. Assessment activities included Phase I and II ESAs, Asbestos Surveys, Lead-in-Drinking Water Surveys, Radon Surveys, Mold Surveys, and similar scope of work items. Real Estate Advisor, Nationwide – Successfully managed and performed environmental site assessments on 42 storage facilities in 13 states. These projects were performed under an expedited schedule and included asbestos and lead paint surveys as well as additional services such as wetlands and floodplain research. Responsibilities included technical oversight, project coordination, and regulatory agency interaction in several states. Mortgage Company, Nationwide – Successfully manage the completion of approximately 20 to 30
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and HUD 4128 projects annually. Assessment activities
include additional services such as historic preservation, floodplain hazard, wetlands, endangered species, and noise assessments. Engineering Client / City of Tahoka, Texas Principal over environmental assessment (per 31 TAC 363.14 of the TWDB rules) to evaluate potential environmental issues/contamination and the potential impact of such issues on a state-funded water line replacement for the City. Required consideration of alternatives to the project and document preparation. Industrial Park, Houston, TX – Performed Phase II Environmental Site Assessment on a 25-acre multi-tenant industrial warehouse property. Assessment included the installation of approximately 60 soil borings and 14 groundwater monitoring wells. Soil and groundwater sampling events occurred over an extended period of time resulting in the division of the property into three impacted sections
that were entered into the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and Texas Railroad Commission Voluntary Cleanup Programs individually.

Appendix G
Information Requested From Client
Excerpts from Documents Provided by
Client or Others

Environmental Site Assessment Document List – Attachment A ver 3/17/2017
Page 1 of 3
Environmental Site Assessment
Document List – Attachment A

Important: A copy must be provided to consultant and JPMorgan
Document Current Status (as of October 30, 2019) Description of Document(s) Provided
1. Environmental site assessment reports Received Targus Phase I ESA (2013)
2. Environmental audit reports Not applicable
3. Environmental permits (e.g. solid waste disposal permits, hazardous waste disposal permits, wastewater permits and NPDES
permits)
Not applicable
4. Registrations for underground and above-
ground storage tanks
Not applicable
5. Safety, preparedness and prevention plans Not applicable
6. Spills prevention, countermeasure and
control plans, etc.
Not applicable
7. Legal (ALTA) survey Received McAdams undated/ unsigned site plans
8. Notices or other correspondence from any government agency relating to past or current violations of environmental laws
with respect to the property or relating to
environmental liens encumbering the property
Not applicable
9. Documentation regarding any pending,
threatened or past litigation or
administrative proceedings in, on or from the property
None – Not applicable

Environmental Site Assessment Document List – Attachment A ver 3/17/2017
Page 2 of 3
Document Current Status (as of October 30, 2019) Description of Document(s) Provided
10. Hazardous waste generator notices or
reports
None – Not applicable
11. Geotechnical studies Not received.
12. Asbestos surveys, ACM abatement
documents, ACM O&M plans and IAQ
reports or tests
Received. Received as part of the 2013 Phase I
ESA.
13. Documentation regarding environmental insurance claims. Any current or past
environmental insurance policies in place.
None – Not applicable
14. Documentation regarding mold or microbial
contaminants insurance claims. Mold and microbial growth O&M plan
None – Not applicable
15. Tenant complaint log and maintenance records Not applicable
16. Prior Vapor Encroachment Screenings
(VES)
None – Not applicable
17. Legionella Water Management Program
(for buildings over 10 stories, centralized hot water systems, cooling towers, hot tubs,
decorative fountains, or centralized
humidifiers) and chemical water treatment system maintenance contract and records.
None – Not applicable
Additional documents requested during due diligence:
18. (by consultant or JPMorgan, as necessary)
19.

Environmental Site Assessment Document List – Attachment A ver 3/17/2017
Page 3 of 3
Responses to the Current Status should be:
1. Received (see Note below) 2. Not Received (but applicable to the project and awaiting receipt)
3. Not Available (applicable to the project but seller indicates they cannot or will not deliver the item) 4. Not Applicable (to the project) 5. For particular documents, any additional status information beyond the labels above is welcomed.
Note: For any documents on the above list that are made available to the consultant on site, a copy must still be sent to JPMorgan as
requested.

REPORT OF PHASE I
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

NORTH HILLS RETAIL
4217 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina 26709

Prepared for:

J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.
270 Park Avenue, 7th floor
New York, New York 10017

Prepared by:

Targus Associates, LLC
1900 Diplomat Drive
Dallas, Texas 75234
[phone]

Targus Project T13-2754

October 15, 2013

© 2013, Targus Associates, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

October 15, 2013

J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.
270 Park Avenue, 7th floor
New York, New York 10017

Attention: David Ridley

Subject: Report of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
North Hills Retail
4217 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina 27609
Targus Project T13-2754

Dear Mr. Ridley:

Targus Associates, LLC (Targus) is pleased to submit this report of the Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment for the North Hills Retail property, located at 4217 Six Forks
Road in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina. This report discusses background
information, purpose and scope of work, execution of work, conclusions, and
recommendations for the subject property.

ASTM E 1527-05 states that an ESA “meeting or exceeding” this practice and completed
less than 180 days prior to the date of acquisition or intended transaction is presumed to be
valid if the report is being relied on by the user for whom the assessment was originally
prepared and the following components were completed: interviews, searches for recorded
environmental cleanup liens, the regulatory review, site visit, and the declaration by the
environmental professional responsible for the assessment. Based on this requirement, this
report is presumed to be valid for 180 days after September 26, 2013.

We appreciate your selection of Targus for this project and look forward to assisting you
further on other projects. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact either
of the undersigned.

Sincerely,
Targus Associates, LLC
Christopher Schmitt Britt Blaylock
Associate Environmental Professional Senior Environmental Professional

http://companyweb/ip/Inactive Projects/T13-2754 JPM North Hills Retail/Report Text/2754 - North Hills Mall Phase I ESA Final.docx
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................iii
2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1
2.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................. 1
2.2 Detailed Scope-of-Services ................................................................................... 2
2.3 Significant Assumptions ....................................................................................... 3
2.4 Limitations and Exceptions ................................................................................... 4
2.5 Special Terms and Conditions .............................................................................. 5
2.6 User Reliance ......................................................................................................... 5
2.6.1 Third Party Reliance by Contract ....................................................................... 5
3.0 SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ......................................................................... 5
3.1 Location and Legal Description ............................................................................ 5
3.2 Subject Property and Vicinity General Characteristics ....................................... 5
3.3 Current Use of the Property .................................................................................. 6
3.4 Descriptions of Structures, Roads, Other Improvements on the Subject
Property ..................................................................................................................10
3.5 Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties ...........................................................10
4.0 USER-PROVIDED INFORMATION ...............................................................................11
4.1 Title Records .........................................................................................................12
4.2 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations ........................................13
4.3 Specialized Knowledge .........................................................................................13
4.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ..................................................13
4.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information ...........................13
4.6 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information .......................................13
4.7 Reason for Performing Phase I ............................................................................14
4.8 Other ......................................................................................................................14
5.0 RECORDS REVIEW .....................................................................................................14
5.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources ...........................................................14
5.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources .........................................................26
5.3 Physical Setting Source(s) ...................................................................................26
5.4 Historical Use Information on the Subject Property ...........................................28
5.5 Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties ...........................................30
5.6 Review of Previous Reports .................................................................................35
6.0 SUBJECT PROPERTY RECONNAISSANCE ..............................................................46
6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions ................................................................46
6.2 General Subject Property Setting ........................................................................46
6.3 Exterior Observations ...........................................................................................51
6.4 Interior Observations ............................................................................................52
7.0 INTERVIEWS ................................................................................................................52
8.0 FINDINGS .....................................................................................................................53
9.0 OPINION .......................................................................................................................54
10.0 CONCLUSIONS ..........................................................................................................55
10.1 ASTM Issues ........................................................................................................55
10.2 Non-ASTM Issues ................................................................................................56
11.0 DATA GAPS AND DEVIATIONS ................................................................................56
12.0 Non-ASTM SCOPE ITEMS .........................................................................................57
12.1 Asbestos ..............................................................................................................57
12.2 Radon ...................................................................................................................58
12.3 Lead-Based Paint ................................................................................................58
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page ii

12.4 Lead-in-Drinking Water .......................................................................................58
12.5 Wetlands ..............................................................................................................59
12.6 Regulatory Compliance ......................................................................................59
12.7 Cultural and Historic Resources ........................................................................59
12.8 Endangered Species ...........................................................................................60
12.9 IAQ/Microbial Contamination ............................................................................60
12.10 High-Voltage Power Lines ................................................................................60
13.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................60
14.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S) ......................................62
15.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S) ...............................62

Appendices

Appendix A - Figures:
Topographic Map
Site Plan
Site (Vicinity) Map
Appendix B - Photographs
Appendix C - Historical Research Documentation
Appendix D - Regulatory Records Documentation
Appendix E - Interview Documentation
Appendix F - Qualifications of Environmental Professionals
Appendix G - Information Requested from Client/Excerpts from Documents
Provided by the Client or Others

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page iii

1.0 SUMMARY

Client Name: JP Morgan Investment
Management, Inc. Property Visit Date: October 1, 2013
Client Contact: David Ridley Property Contact: Mr. Jennings Glenn, Kane
Realty
Project No.: T13-2754 Date of Construction:
1960s - (JC Penny and 4421 Six
Forks Road)
2004 - North Hills Mall District
2006 - Alexan and Lassiter District
2009 - Park & Market District
Project Manager: Britt Blaylock No. Bldgs./Units: 15
Phone No.: [phone] No. of Stories:
Between one and three-story
buildings. Ground floor retail for
Alexan District and Park & Market
District
Email: [e-mail] Bldg. Square Footage: ~ 695,000 sf of retail
~ 101,000 sf of offices.
Property Name: North Hills Retail Property Acreage: ~ 29 Acres
Property Address: 4217 Six Forks Road Basement/Slab on grade: Slab-on-Grade and subgrade
parking garage
Property Town,
County, State:
Raleigh, Wake County,
North Carolina Property Use: Retail / Commercial
Property
Identification:
North Hills Retail (North
Hills Mall District / Alexan
District / Lassiter District /
Park & Market District)
Property History:
Vacant Land / Single- and
Multifamily Residences /
North Hills Mall.
Other Improvements: See report text

Report
Section

Assessment Item

No Further
Investigation

HREC

REC
Non-
ASTM
Risk

Opinion of
Probable
Cost
5.1 Groundwater
Contamination X (1) NA
5.1 Soil Contamination X
6.2 Stressed Vegetation X
6.2, 6.4 Surficial Disturbance or
Staining (2) NA
5.1, 6.2 USTs/LUSTs X
5.1, 6.2 ASTs X
6.2, 6.4 PCBs (incl. ballasts) X
5.1 Petroleum X
5.1, 6.2, 6.3 Waste Generation/
Disposal Issues (3)
5.2, 12.6,
12.7 Operational Issues X
3.5, 5.1, 5.5 Nearby Property Issues X NA
3.5, 5.1, 5.5 Adjacent Property
Issues X (4) NA
5.4, 5.5 Historical Issues (5) NA
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page iv

Report
Section

Assessment Item

No Further
Investigation

HREC

REC
Non-
ASTM
Risk

Opinion of
Probable
Cost
5.6 Previous Report Issues X
5.1, 5.2 Regulatory Review
Issues X
5.2, 6.3, 6.4 Chemical or Hazardous
Substance Issues X
12.6, 12.7 Proposed Use Issues X
6.3, 6.4, 12.9 Odors X
12.1 ACMs (6) O&M
$2,500
12.2 Radon X
12.3 Lead-Based Paint X
12.4 Lead in Drinking Water X
12.5 Wetlands X
12.6 Regulatory Compliance X
12.7 Cultural and Historic
Resources X
N/A Industrial Hygiene N/A
N/A Health and Safety N/A
N/A Ecological Resources N/A
12.8 Endangered Species X
12.9 IAQ/Microbial
Contamination X
12.10 High Voltage Power
Lines X

J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. (JPMIM) has engaged Targus Associates, LLC
(Targus) to perform a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) on the North Hills
Retail property, located at 4217 Six Forks Road (primary address) in Raleigh, Wake County,
North Carolina (subject property). The subject property encompassed approximately 29
acres of land and was improved with 15 mixed-use buildings for an outdoor retail mall and
apartments on upper floors. The apartment portions of the buildings (Alexan Apartments and
Park & Market Apartments) are excluded from the subject property. The retail mall portions
of the site consisted of ground floor retail, restaurants, second/third floor offices, multiple
outparcels, surface lots and parking decks (above and below grade). The on-site buildings
were surrounded by asphalt-paved parking lots and access roads, as well as landscaped
areas. Construction and/or renovations of original 1960s era buildings (JC Penney’s and
4421 Six Forks Road) were completed from 2004 to 2009. A Chuy’s restaurant was under
construction at the Park & Market District. The current occupant of the subject property was
North Hills Retail; a tenant list is included in the appendices. The subject property was
located in an area characterized by retail/ commercial businesses, banks, single- and
multifamily residences, and restaurants.

Based on the information obtained to date, Targus' conclusions and recommendations are
as follows:

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page v

1.) The North Hills Mall District and Lassiter District portions of the subject property are
adjoined by an Exxon service station and the location of two former dry cleaners
(Brothers Cleaners and North Hills Cleaners), respectively. The Brothers and North Hills
Cleaners locations are presently used as parking lot areas in the northeast corner of the
Lassiter District. Both the Exxon and Brothers Cleaners have incurred release incidents
resulting in plumes of petroleum and/or chlorinated solvents in groundwater having
migrated beneath the Lassiter and North Hills Mall District properties. Responsible
parties have been identified for the off-site release incidents and active
remediation/monitoring of both release incidents is on-going under the supervision of the
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). Targus
notes that the North Hills Cleaners was situated down-gradient of and within the area of
the former Brothers Cleaners groundwater plume. No release incident was identified for
the North Hills Cleaners and groundwater monitoring results from that immediate area
do not support an additional release from those prior operations. Review of available
resources has not identified occupants or operations on the subject property that would
appear likely to have contributed to the groundwater impact. Targus considers the
Exxon, former Brothers Cleaners, and the associated petroleum and hazardous
substances in groundwater beneath the subject property to present a recognized environmental condition.

2.) Targus observed limited oil staining within the maintenance storage room in the parking
garage at the North Hills Mall District. The staining originated from maintenance of
equipment, carts, and four wheelers within the storage room. The staining was
restricted to the concrete and Targus considers it to be a de minimis condition and not a recognized environmental condition to the subject property at this time.

3.) The subject property (NHMOO LLC, Dillard’s, and/or Oklahoma Installation) was
identified on the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and FINDS
databases with no reported violations. The listings are not related to current operations
and appear primarily to be related to generation/disposal of materials (including
asbestos) during times of renovations. Listings did not appear to be related to spills,
release events, or similar circumstances. Based on lack violations and no present waste
generator listings, Targus does not consider the on-site regulatory listings for the subject
property to be a recognized environmental condition.

4.) A former Firestone automotive repair facility was located within approximately 50 feet of
eastern boundary of the North Hills Mall District; this area is presently a parking lot. This
facility operated between the early 1960s and 2004 and utilized 14 hydraulic lifts, a 200-
gallon gasoline underground storage tank (UST), and a 550-gallon used oil UST. The
USTs and hydraulic lifts were removed, the building razed, and release incidents closed
by the DENR via No Further Action (NFA) letters. Subsurface impact to soil and/or
groundwater from the Firestone activities was reported to have been localized to the
Firestone property. Additionally, extensive groundwater sampling efforts in relation to the
aforementioned Exxon and Brothers Cleaners included wells in the immediate vicinity of
the former Firestone. No material impact to groundwater that did not appear attributable
to the Exxon or Brothers facilities was reported in available documents. Ms. Karen
Harmon with DENR stated that “…if it (groundwater contamination from Firestone) had
appeared to have been co-mingled to the west with the much larger contaminant plumes
from the Exxon release then the incident would not have been allowed NFA”. Based on
the cessation of operations, regulatory closure, interviews, and groundwater sampling
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page vi

efforts in the immediate vicinity; Targus considers the former Firestone a historical recognized environmental condition and not a recognized environmental condition.

5.) A 1959 aerial photograph depicts a building near the southeastern boundary of the North
Hills Mall District parcel that by positioning of the building near an intersection and
driveways around the structure has the potential to have been a filling station. Prior
consultants reported a similar opinion. The potential for a filling station to have been on
the subject property presents a suspect recognized environmental condition; however,
extensive groundwater sampling efforts in relation to the aforementioned Exxon and
Brothers Cleaners included wells down-gradient of the former facility. No impact to
groundwater that did not appear attributable to the Exxon or Brothers facilities was
identified and the facility had been removed by 1965. Based on a lack of regulatory
listings, redevelopment of the area over 45 years ago, and recent groundwater sampling
results; Targus does not consider the former facility to present a recognized
environmental condition.

In accordance with the proposed scope of work, Targus included certain non-ASTM scope
considerations as enumerated in Section 12.0. Asbestos is discussed further below.

6.) The building at 4421 Six Forks Road in the Lassiter District and the JC Penney store and
associated parking structure in the North Hills Mall District were constructed in the 1960s.
Suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM) observed in these and the other on-site
buildings on the day of the assessment included various wall and ceiling systems
(including wallboard, joint compound and texture), numerous colors and patterns of
sheet flooring (linoleum) and floor tile with floor tile mastic, caulking, spray-applied fire
proofing, and ceiling tiles. The suspect ACM was observed by Targus to be in generally
good condition. Regardless of past renovations and in the absence of data to the
contrary, Targus cannot rule out ACM remaining at the subject property. Based on the
good condition of the suspect ACM identified, asbestos is not considered to be a business environmental risk to the subject property at this time.

ASTM Issues

Targus has performed a Phase I ESA of the North Hills Retail property, located at 4217 Six
Forks Road in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina in general conformance with the scope
and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-05. Exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice
are described in Section 11.0 of this report.

Based upon the information obtained, as reflected in this report, this assessment has
revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject
property except as follows:

• The adjacent Exxon and Brothers Cleaners facilities and their associated petroleum
and/or chlorinated solvent-impacted groundwater that has migrated under the subject
property.

Given the off-site nature of the release incidents and in consideration that the responsible
parties are cooperating with the DENR to assess and remediate the impact, it is Targus’
opinion that additional information is not warranted to obtain greater certainty regarding the
identified recognized environmental condition.

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page vii

Targus notes that agreements between the responsible parties and the DENR through the
Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act have afforded certain liability protections to affected non-
source property owners so long as assessment and monitoring activities are not impeded
and contingent upon certain other conditions. As allowed by the statutes, liability protections
may also be provided to future owners of contaminated down-gradient properties (such as
portions of the subject property) in appropriate circumstances.

Additionally, according to Ms. Karen Harmon, Project Manager with the DENR for the Exxon
release, responsible parties (NHMOO and Payne Services, original Exxon owner) are
actively cooperating with the DENR to assess and cleanup the release through the State’s
Trust Fund for leaking underground storage tanks (LUSTs). Further, Ms. Harmon reported
that the DENR UST Section has no innocent landowner programs or similar liability
protections but, that such protection would not be needed for the renter/purchaser of a
building located over a dissolved contaminant plume clearly originating from a UST system
with a known owner and operator “(the only person that would be held responsible for the
contamination)”.

With regard to both the Exxon and Brothers Cleaners releases, Targus understands that
JPMIM will confirm with counsel the organization of business partnerships to confirm
continued applicability of liability protections to future owning entities.

Targus also recommends better housekeeping practices in regards to the observed surface
staining from spills around the used cooking grease containers at various locations around
the subject property as well as to prevent additional motor oil spills or staining in
maintenance areas.

Non-ASTM Issues

In accordance with the proposed scope of work, Targus included certain non-ASTM scope
considerations as discussed in Section 12.0 of this report. Based on Targus’ understanding
of the Client’s objectives, risk tolerance, and future plans for the subject property, this
assessment/review did not identify business environmental risk associated with the non-
ASTM items; however, this conclusion is specifically conditional on proper future
management of ACM and suspect ACM in accordance with applicable regulations. Targus
has found that written O&M programs assist owners in maintaining compliance with these
regulations.

Targus recommends a written O&M program be prepared and implemented for the subject
property.

This summary is for convenience only and should not be relied upon without first reading the
full contents of this report, including appendix materials.

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 1

2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 PURPOSE

The purpose of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was to identify
recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property. As defined by
ASTM E 1527-05, “The term recognized environmental conditions means the presence or
likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under
conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release
of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into the structures on the property or
into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term includes hazardous
substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term
is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a threat to
human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an
enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.”

The term historical recognized environmental condition as defined by ASTM is an
“environmental condition which in the past would have been considered a recognized environmental condition, but which may or may not be considered a recognized
environmental condition currently.” ASTM further defines a historical recognized
environmental condition by stating “If a past release of any hazardous substances or
petroleum products has occurred in connection with the property and has been remediated,
with such remediation accepted by the responsible regulatory agency… this condition shall
be considered a historical recognized environmental condition…”

The term suspect recognized environmental condition as used throughout this report is cited
from Section 12.5 of ASTM E 1527-05. Targus uses this term for conditions that have a
potential to be a de minimis condition, a recognized environmental condition, a historical
recognized environmental condition, or not a recognized environmental condition for the
subject property and requires further discussion as presented within the text of this report.
Section 8.0 summarizes each of the known or suspect recognized environmental conditions
associated with the subject property. In Section 9.0, Targus presents its opinion of the
potential impact a known or suspect recognized environmental condition has on the subject
property and whether or not the suspect recognized environmental condition is currently a
de minimis condition, a recognized environmental condition, or a historical recognized environmental condition, based on site-specific characteristics.

ASTM E 1527-05 states that an ESA “meeting or exceeding” this practice and completed
less than 180 days prior to the date of acquisition or intended transaction is presumed to be
valid if the report is being relied on by the user for whom the assessment was originally
prepared. The components of the practice to be completed within 180 days include:
interviews, searches for recorded environmental cleanup liens, the regulatory review, site
visit and the declaration by the environmental professional responsible for the assessment.
The ASTM E 1527-05 practice also states that within this 180 day period, if the assessment
will be used by a different user than whom the assessment was originally prepared, the
subsequent user must also satisfy the user’s responsibilities.

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 2

2.2 DETAILED SCOPE-OF-SERVICES

The scope of services was performed in general conformance with the ASTM E 1527-05
document Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessment: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process1 and Client-specified requirements (see Section 2.5).

The Phase I ESA consisted of a historical review of the subject property and area use,
regulatory database review, assessment of the physical setting, subject property and area
reconnaissance, and a report of Targus’ findings, opinions, and conclusions. Data gaps or
deviations from this standard, if applicable, are described in Section 11.0.

Subject Property and Area Use

Using selected sources of reasonably ascertainable public information, Targus attempted to
review the current and historical uses of the subject property. The Phase I ESA historical
review extends back until 1940 or, for uses prior to that date, back to the time the subject
property was undeveloped. Sources of historical use information relating to the subject
property and its adjoining properties were acquired and reviewed according to the
reasonable availability of the information, the time limits provided for data acquisition and
review, as permitted, by the project schedule and cost, and Targus’ judgment of the likely
value of the information for indicating environmental conditions. Historical sources reviewed
by Targus are listed in Section 13.0 and typically include local city directories, aerial
photographs, and a topographic map. If available through the database provider, the
historical sources reviewed also included Fire Insurance Maps.

Regulatory Status Review

Targus reviewed a report of select regulatory databases published for the local area to
identify facilities potentially constituting a suspect recognized environmental condition in
regard to the subject property. Targus reviewed the databases to identify recorded facilities
located on, or in proximity to, the subject property using the ASTM E 1527-05 standard
environmental record sources and recommended approximate minimum search distances.

Targus attempted to obtain additional information regarding listed facilities that, in its
professional judgment, may constitute recognized environmental conditions in connection
with the subject property. In addition, local agencies were contacted regarding recorded
information, incidents, or activities of environmental concern relating to the subject property
and its immediate environs.

Subject Property Physical Setting

Targus obtained and reviewed reasonably ascertainable published subject property
information to characterize the physical setting of the subject property. Sources reviewed
are listed in Section 13.0 of this report. If reasonably ascertainable, Targus reviewed the
current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map showing the area on which the subject property
is located. Targus reviewed one or more physical setting sources at the discretion of the
environmental professional to obtain information about the geologic, hydrogeologic,
1 ASTM E 1527-05 is incorporated by reference; Targus can assist the Client with obtaining a copy of
this standard on request.
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 3

hydrologic, or topographic characteristics of the subject property. Discretionary physical
setting sources may have been sought if (1) conditions had been identified in which
hazardous substances or petroleum products are likely to be present on-site or to migrate to
the subject property from off-site sources and (2) more information is generally obtained,
pursuant to local good commercial or customary practice.

Subject Property and Area Reconnaissance

The subject property reconnaissance consisted of field observations of the subject property
and adjoining land areas by Targus personnel experienced in environmental site
assessments. Targus observed and documented current uses of the subject property and
indicators of hazardous substances, petroleum products, storage tanks, odors, pools of
liquid, drums, containers, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), heating and cooling systems,
stains, corrosion, drains and sumps, pits, ponds, lagoons, stressed vegetation, wastes,
wells, and septic systems. The area reconnaissance was performed on foot within areas
that were reasonably accessible and at Targus’ discretion by automobile along publicly
accessible roads.

Non-ASTM Issues

As requested by the Client, Targus included certain non-ASTM scope considerations in an
attempt to identify business environmental risk associated with the subject property. As
defined by ASTM E 1527-05, the term business environmental risk is a potential
environmental condition or environmentally-driven financial impact that could materially
affect the current or planned use of the subject property. These conditions are not
necessarily limited to those environmental issues required to be assessed under ASTM E
1527-05. Rather, consideration of business environmental risk typically is associated with
one or more Client-specified, non-ASTM scope assessment activities such as described in
Section 12.0 of this report.

Report

Targus has prepared this report, which includes the findings concerning known or suspect
recognized environmental conditions and an opinion as to the potential impact those
conditions would have on the subject property. Targus’ services also included assessment
of recognized environmental conditions that may constitute potential business environmental
risks at the time of the Phase I ESA. Finally, this report concludes whether or not the
assessment revealed recognized environmental conditions, and whether the recognized environmental conditions are considered a business environmental risk.

2.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS

Information obtained from the Client, the Client’s representative, individuals interviewed, and
prior environmental reports were considered to be accurate unless Targus’ reasonable
inquiries clearly revealed otherwise.

Conditions observed were considered to be representative of areas that were not observed
unless otherwise indicated.

The primary direction of groundwater flow was assumed to be dictated by topography,
unless otherwise indicated by measurement of potentiometric surface or other quantifiable
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 4

data. Additionally, the groundwater flow direction was assumed to control the distribution of
impact, if present.

2.4 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS

The findings and opinions presented are relative to the dates the work was conducted and
should not be relied on to represent conditions at later dates. The opinions included herein
are based on information obtained during the assessment and Targus' experience. If
additional information becomes available that may impact Targus' environmental
assessment findings, Targus requests the opportunity to review the information, reassess
the potential concerns, and modify Targus' opinions, if warranted.

This assessment included visual observations to identify obvious features or conditions
indicative of recognized environmental conditions.

Although this assessment has attempted to identify recognized environmental conditions,
Targus cannot eliminate all uncertainty as to recognized environmental conditions in
connection with the subject property nor represent or warrant that the subject property
contains no hazardous substances or petroleum products or other latent conditions beyond
those identified through the scope of work identified herein. Other features, conditions, and
constituents may have escaped detection due to: (1) the limited scope of this assessment as
driven by Client objectives, (2) the inaccuracy of public records, (3) environmental incidents
that may have gone undetected or unreported prior to this assessment, (4) inaccessible
areas, and/or (5) deliberate concealment of detrimental information.

Although this assessment has attempted to identify business environmental risk, potential
business environmental risk may have escaped detection due to: (1) the limited scope of
this assessment, (2) the inaccuracy of public records, (3) the presence of undetected or
unreported environmental incidents, (4) inaccessible areas, (5) deliberate concealment of
detrimental information, (6) the subjective nature of materiality to the user with respect to
business environmental risk, (7) a lack of understanding of the future use of the subject
property, and/or (8) the limited degree of the current state of knowledge for certain non-
ASTM scope items.

Targus' professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill
ordinarily exercised, under similar conditions, by reputable environmental consultants
undertaking similar studies and practicing in this locality during the same timeframe. No
other warranty, express or implied, is intended or made with respect to this report or Targus’
services. This assessment was not exhaustive and users of this report should consider the
scope and limitations related to these services when developing opinions as to risks
associated with the subject property. These potential risks may be more thoroughly
evaluated as an additional service in an effort to further reduce, but not eliminate,
uncertainty. Upon request Targus can provide options for additional research or assessment
and anticipated additional cost and timing requirements.

This report presents an assessment of the subject property as defined by information
provided by the Client, Client’s representative, or Key Site Manager. Targus’ findings,
opinions, and conclusions are based on the locations and boundaries of the subject property
as evident in the field and on maps or plats provided by the Client, Client’s representative, or
Key Site Manager.

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 5

2.5 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

The work was conducted in general conformance with JP Morgan Environmental Site
Assessment Work Order – Exhibit A, dated September 25, 2013 (Targus Proposal P13-
4034); the Master Services Agreement, dated July 27, 2011; Exhibit B, dated July 27, 2011;
Exhibit C, dated July 27, 2011; and the terms and conditions established therein. The User
of this Phase I ESA is Targus’ Client, J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. (JPMIM).

There are no special contractual conditions between the user and Environmental
Professional.

2.6 USER RELIANCE

This report represents Targus’ services as of the date hereof. As Targus’ final document, it
may not be altered after final issuance. This assessment and report were prepared on
behalf of and for the exclusive use of JPMIM solely for its use and reliance, subject to the
terms and conditions agreed upon between Targus and JPMIM. The Client and Targus were
solely involved in shaping the scope of services. Accordingly, reliance on this report by any
other party may involve assumptions leading to an unintended interpretation of findings and
opinions. As such, reliance by other parties on the contents of this document is not granted,
and any such reliance shall be at the sole risk of the using party. With the consent of Targus
and the Client and for a fee, Targus may offer reliance to third parties or contract with other
parties to develop findings and opinions related to such party’s specific risk management
objectives. Except as otherwise agreed in writing, any and all third party reliance upon this
Phase I ESA shall be subject to the terms in Targus’ standard Terms and Conditions; the
$50,000 liability limitation listed in Targus’ standard Terms and Conditions (available upon
request) constitutes Targus’ aggregate liability to any and all relying third parties for any and
all claims.

2.6.1 THIRD PARTY RELIANCE BY CONTRACT

Client retains the right, at no additional cost, to provide this report to affiliates, successors,
assigns, lenders and third parties for use and Targus agrees that such parties at no
additional cost, shall have the right to rely on information provided within the report, subject
to the terms of the Master Service Agreement between Targus and JPMIM.

3.0 SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

3.1 LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION

The subject property was located at 4217 Six Forks Road in Raleigh, Wake County, North
Carolina. Figures depicting the subject property are located in the appendices. The site
boundaries indicated on Targus’ site plan were identified by a marked North Hills Directory
Map and confirmed by the site contact specified by JPMIM.

3.2 SUBJECT PROPERTY AND VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS

The subject property and area reconnaissance, performed on October 3, 2013, consisted of
visual observations made during a foot and vehicular tour of the subject property and
adjoining land areas. The area reconnaissance was performed on foot within areas that
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 6

were reasonably accessible and at Targus’ discretion by automobile along publicly
accessible roads. Targus’ area reconnaissance observations are described in Section 3.5,
and subject property observations are described in Section 6.0.

3.3 CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY

The subject property is an outdoor retail mall approximately containing 695,000 square feet
of owned retail, and approximately 101,000 square feet second/third floor offices, multiple
outparcels, surface lots and parking decks. The North Hills Retail is divided into four
districts: North Hills Mall District, Alexan District, Lassiter District, and Park & Market District.
The following is a description and tenant list for each District

North Hills Mall District
North Hills Mall District consists of outdoor retail mall and The Offices at North Hills, which is
comprised of approximately 101,000 square feet of office space in multiple two and three-
story buildings by three separate addresses.

The Offices at North Hills
4120 Main at North Hills Street was a two-story building with second floor office space
totaling approximately 6,000 square feet. This building includes two passenger elevators
that travel directly from the two levels of the parking deck below. 4120 Main at North Hills
was occupied by Windstream Hosted Solutions. 4321 Lassiter at North Hills was a two-story
building with second floor office space totaling approximately 20,500 square feet. This
Building includes two passenger elevators that travel directly from the two levels of the
parking deck below. The second floor offices at 4321 Lassiter at were occupied by Kane
Realty Corporation and Windstream Hosted Solutions. 4350 Lassiter is a three-story
building with second and third floor office space totaling approximately 74,500 square feet
with two passenger elevators and one service elevator. The second and third floor offices at
4350 Lassiter at North Hills were occupied by Bio-Rad, Best Practices, Cushman &
Wakefield | Thalhimer, DTS Software, Fleishman Hillard Inc, Graebe Hanna & Welborn
PLLC, K&L Gates, RKJ/Wells Fargo Advisors, and the Wake Family Law Group.

The following is tenant list of retail / commercial at North Hills Mall District and ground floor
retail:

North Hills Mall District Tenant List
Address/
Suite Number
Tenant Description of Activities SREC
Y/N
If Yes,
Section Discussed
4120 Main at North Hills Street
4120-100 Natural Body Retail N
4120-105 Fitness Connection Fitness N
4120-110 Keva Juice Restaurant N
4120-115 Mitchell’s Hair Salon N
4120-120 Vacant Vacant N
4120-125 Brighton Collectibles Retail N
4120-130 AT&T Service N
4120-135 The Q Shack Retail N
4120-140 Which Wich? Restaurant N
4120-145 Omega Sports Retail N
4120-150 Sports Clips Salon N
4120-155 Five Guys Restaurant N
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 7

North Hills Mall District Tenant List
Address/
Suite Number
Tenant Description of Activities SREC
Y/N
If Yes,
Section Discussed
4150 Main at North Hills Street
4150-100 Regal Cinemas 14 Theater N
4151 Main at North Hills Street
4151-105 Lil’s Chef Restaurant N
4151-110 Vacant Vacant N
4151-115 Vacant Vacant N
4151-120 Vacant Vacant N
4151-100 Lenscrafters Retail N
4154 Main at North Hills Street
4154-135 Game Stop Retail N
4154-140 Chick-Fil-A Restaurant N
4158 Main at North Hills Street
4158-100 Monkee’s Retail N
4158-101 Sunglass Hut Retail N
4158-103 Cinellii’s Restaurant N
4158-125 Fox and Hound Restaurant N
4270 The Circle at North Hills Street
4270-100 North State Bank Bank N
4121-100 Plow & Hearth Retail N
4121-110 Mura Retail N
4291 The Circle at North Hills Street
4291-100 REI Retail N
4351 The Circle at North Hills Street
4351-101 Sleepy’s Retail N
4351-105 Bijuju Retail N
4351-107 Artsource Retail N
4351-111 Cameron Clothing Retail N
4351-115 Vacant Vacant N
4351-119 Coquette Retail N
4321 Lassiter at North Hills Avenue
4321-100 Kerry Catherine
Jewelry
Retail N
4321-102 Vermillion Retail N
4321-105 Learning Express Service N
4321-110 Apricot Lane Retail N
4321-115 Fleur Retail N
4321-120 Fink’s Jewelers Retail N
4350 Lassiter at North Hills Avenue
4350-100 Moe’s Southwest Grill Restaurant N
4350-104 Beyond Blue Retail N
4350-106 Lilies Clothing Studio Retail N
4350-110 Varsity Men’s Wear Retail N
4350-112 HPW Coldwell Banker Service N
4350-114 Comfortable Soles Retail N
4350-118 Firebirds Rocky
Mountain Grill
Restaurant N
4380 Lassiter at North Hills Avenue
4380-100 Ethan Allen Retail N
4217 Six Forks Road
4217-100 JC Penny Retail Y 5.2
4261 Six Forks Road
4261-119 Bank of America Bank N
4261-130 Office Deport Retail N
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 8

North Hills Mall District Tenant List
Address/
Suite Number
Tenant Description of Activities SREC
Y/N
If Yes,
Section Discussed
4220 Lassiter Mill Road
4220-100 Wells Fargo Bank N
4381 Lassiter Mill Road
4381-100 Ruth’s Chris Steak
House
Restaurant N
4381-105 Rodolfo Gonzales
Interior Design
Service N
SREC-Suspect recognized environmental condition

Alexan District
The subject property at the Alexan District consisted of the ground floor retail spaces and
excludes the apartment complex floor above. The following is tenant list of retail /
commercial on ground floor:

Alexan District Tenant List
Address/
Suite Number
Tenant Description of
Activities
SREC
Y/N
If Yes,
Section Discussed
4209 Lassiter Mill Road
4209-100 Traditions by Anna Retail N
4209-102 Whalebone Urban Surf Retail N
4209-106 Gena Chandler Retail N
4209-108 Relax the Back Service N
4209-110 The Spectacle Retail N
4209-112/114 Von Kekel Salon Spa Spa N
4209-115 Vivace Retail N
4209-117 Alexan Office Administrative offices N
4209-119 Quintessentials Retail N
4209-121 J. McLaughlin Retail N
4209-123 Lamb’s Ear Retail N
4209-125 Paper Buzz Retail N
4209-126 Luxe Retail N
4209-127 Uniquities Retail N
4209-128 Flink’s Retail N
4209-130 Kitchen & Bath Galleries Retail N
4209-132 Trends N Traditions Retail N
4209-133 Glo De Vie Med Spa Spa N
4209-134 Pure Barre Retail N
4209-136 Black Cat Retail N
SREC-Suspect recognized environmental condition

Lassiter District
The Lassiter District consists of two one-story buildings for retail / commercial with Building
4421 having been renovated from original 1960s construction, and Building 4441
constructed in 2009. The following is tenant list of retail / commercial on ground floor:

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 9

Lassiter District Tenant List
Address/ Suite
Number
Tenant Description of
Activities
SREC
Y/N
If Yes,
Section Discussed
4421 Six Forks Road
4421-101/102A Lee Spa Nails Spa N
4421-102B Exclusive Alterations Service N
4421-103A Vacant Vacant N
4421-103B Serotta’s Restaurant N
4421-104 Monograms, Inc Retail N
4421-105 Midtown Olive Press Service N
4421-107 Vacant Vacant N
4421-109A Elaine Miller Retail N
4421-109B Cool Sweats Retail N
4421-110 Yogen Fruz Restaurant N
4421-111 Total Wine Retail N
4421-113 Lululemon Athletica Retail N
4421-114 Main & Taylor Retail N
4421-115 Midtown Bar Restaurant N
4421-116A Pharaoh’s Restaurant N
4421-116B Starbuck’s Restaurant N
4421-117 GNC Retail N
4421-118/119 Panera Bread Restaurant N
4421-120 Woof Gang Bakery Restaurant N
4421-121 Verizon Service N
4421-122 Bonefish Grill Restaurant N
4421-123 Vacant Vacant N
4441 Six Forks Road
4441-100B Brother’s Cleaners Dry-off dry cleaner N
4441-104B Planet Beach Service / Retail N
4441-106B UPS Store Service / Retail N
4441-110B Kerr Retail N
SREC-Suspect recognized environmental condition

Park & Market District
The subject property at the Park & Market District consisted of three buildings, one of which
(141 Park at North Hill Street) consists of the ground floor retail spaces and excludes the
apartment complex floor above. This building includes two passenger elevators that travel
directly from the parking deck below. The following is tenant list of retail / commercial
properties for the subject property:

Park & Market District Tenant List
Address/
Suite Number
Tenant Description of
Activities
SREC
Y/N
If Yes,
Section Discussed
141 The Circle at North Hills Street
141-100 Piola Service N
141-104 Massage Envy Spa N
141-106 Midtown Mail Spa Spa N
141-108 Salon Blu Salon N
141-111 Saxby’s Coffee Restaurant N
141-112 Zoe’s Kitchen Restaurant N
141-114 Cardinal Sales Office Administrative Offices N
141-116 Ideal Image Service N
141-120 Sparians Bowling Service N
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 10

Park & Market District Tenant List
Address/
Suite Number
Tenant Description of
Activities
SREC
Y/N
If Yes,
Section Discussed
110 Park at North Hills Street
110 Bruegger’s Restaurant N
4020 Market at North Hills Street
4020 Chuy’s (under construction) Restaurant N
SREC-Suspect recognized environmental condition

3.4 DESCRIPTIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADS, OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ON THE
SUBJECT PROPERTY

The subject property encompassed approximately 29 acres of land and was improved with
15 mixed-use buildings for an outdoor retail mall and apartments on upper floors. The
apartment portions of the buildings (Alexan Apartments and Park & Market Apartments) are
excluded from the subject property. The retail mall portions of the site consisted of ground
floor retail, restaurants, second/third floor offices, multiple outparcels, surface lots and
parking decks (above and below grade). The on-site buildings were surrounded by asphalt-
paved parking lots and access roads, as well as landscaped areas. Construction and/or
renovations of original 1960s era buildings (JC Penney’s and 4421 Six Forks Road) were
completed from 2004 to 2009. A Chuy’s restaurant was under construction at the Park &
Market District.

The North Hills Retail consisted of private roads on-site and adjoining. North Hills Mall
District included: The Circle at North Hills Street, Main at North Hills Street, and Lassiter at
North Hills Avenue. Park & Market District included: Park Street, Front Street, Market
Street, Cardinal Street, and State Street. The Alexan and Lassiter Districts did not include
separately named roadways.

3.5 CURRENT USES OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES

Observed current uses of adjoining properties are discussed as follows according to their
respective geographic relationship to the subject property.

North
The North Hills Mall District portions of the subject property were bordered to the north by
parking lots, and Lassiter Mill Road. The Alexan and Lassiter District portions of the subject
property were bordered to the north by The Alexan Apartments, vacant land, a fire station,
and Rowan Street; followed by single-family residences and St. Thomas Episcopal Church
& School. The Park & Market District portions of the subject property were bordered to the
north by vacant land, parking lots, Park & Market Apartments, Midtown Green (under
construction), and St. Albans Drive, followed by wooded vacant land and single-family
residences beyond.

East
The North Hills Mall District portions of the subject property were bordered to the east by
parking lots, Exxon, and Six Forks Road. The Alexan and Lassiter District portions of the
subject property were bordered to the east by parking lots, followed by Six Forks Road with
BB&T Bank, a vacant building, and First Citizen Bank. The Park & Market District portions
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 11

of the subject property were bordered to the east by Midtown Green and Midtown Park
(under construction) and vacant land.

South
The North Hills Mall District portions of the subject property were bordered to the south by
parking lots, Target, Renaissance Raleigh Hotel and The Circle at North Hills private road,
followed by the Interstate Highway 440 with single and multifamily residences beyond. The
Alexan and Lassiter Districts portions of the subject property were bordered to the south by
parking lots and Lassiter Mill Road. The Park & Market District portion of the subject
property were bordered to the south by vacant land, Hyatt House, parking lots, and Captrust
Tower.

West
The North Hills Mall District portions of the subject property were bordered to the west by
parking lots, and Lassiter Mill Road, followed by single-family residences. The Alexan and
Lassiter Districts portions of the subject property were bordered to the west by Pamlico
Drive, followed by single-family residences. The Park & Market District portion of the subject
property were bordered to the west by parking lots and Six Forks Road.

4.0 USER-PROVIDED INFORMATION

ASTM E 1527-05 requires that the environmental professional request from the user of the
Phase I ESA, the Client, certain information (discussed as follows) concerning the subject
property that will help identify the possibility of recognized environmental conditions in
connection with the subject property or to request from the user the names of other
individuals who can provide this information.

ASTM E 1527-05 assigns to the Client or its representative the responsibility to provide the
environmental professional with information pertaining to environmental liens or AULs2
(including institutional controls, physical or engineered controls, land use restrictions,
restrictive covenants, easements, etc.) applicable to the subject property, whether recorded
or not. ASTM E 1527-05 states that the user can engage a title company or title professional
as an addition to the scope of work to be performed by the environmental professional.
ASTM E 1527-05 and the supporting regulation3 state that the search for environmental
liens/AULs by the user may be a significant component in the Environmental Protection
Agency’s (EPA’s) determination of whether a property owner has satisfied the requirements
for landowner liability protection against the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) liability.

Depending on available information and specific site conditions, Targus may conclude that
the failure of the user to provide environmental lien/AUL search documentation does not
present a significant Data Gap and therefore, can declare that Targus has developed and
performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set
2 See ASTM E2091 for additional information about activity and use limitations (AULs), their use and
function, and standard means to check for existence and evaluate compliance with these controls.
TARGUS can assist the Client with obtaining a copy on request. 3 40 CFR 312 Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 12

forth in 40 CFR Part 312. However, failure of the user to provide the information or to
engage the environmental consultant or others to obtain and consider that information may
separately weaken a defense to CERCLA liability.

If the Client or its representative is aware of specialized knowledge or experience that is
material to the identification of recognized environmental conditions, or if it has actual
knowledge that the purchase price of the subject property is significantly less than the
purchase price of comparable properties, ASTM E 1527-05 assigns to the Client the
obligation to communicate that information to the environmental professional prior to the
subject property reconnaissance. ASTM E 1527-05 requires that an explanation of a
significant decrease in purchase price be provided in writing.

ASTM E 1527-05 assigns to the Client or its representative the responsibility to inform the
environmental professional of the reason it wants the Phase I ESA performed and to provide
commonly known, reasonably available information about the subject property that is
material to recognized environmental conditions. Absent information to the contrary, the
purpose for assessment is assumed to be in preparation for a commercial real estate
transaction.

As part of Targus’ engagement to conduct this work, this information was requested from
JPMIM or its representative. In addition, Targus has requested from JPMIM or its
representative helpful documents such as those specified in Section 10.8 of ASTM E 1527-
05 and as listed in the appendices. Finally, Targus inquired whether JPMIM or its
representative was aware of (1) any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to
hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property; (2) any pending,
threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or
petroleum products in, on or from the subject property; or (3) any notices from governmental
entities regarding possible violations of environmental laws or possible liabilities relating to
hazardous substances or petroleum products.

Information known to and reported by the Client and provided at the time of authorization is
discussed below in Sections 4.1 through 4.8. Information provided by others is discussed in
Section 7.0. Information and excerpts from reports provided by JPMIM, its representative, or
others are included in the Appendices of this report and are listed in Section 13.0.

4.1 TITLE RECORDS

JPMIM or its representative did not provide Targus with title records for review. However, at
the request of JPMIM, Targus obtained a chain-of-title from Texas Environmental Research.
Available information indicated that the subject property was owned from prior to 1910 until
present by various individuals and financial institutions. Available information did not
document prior ownerships that indicated suspect recognized environmental conditions.
However, from April 25, 1961 to June 18, 1964, Bashford Plumbing and Heating Company
was identified to have owned Parcels 0410669, 141 Park at North Hills Street (currently
retail and apartment building) and Parcel 0366506, Market at North Hills Street (currently
Bruegger’s Bagels). These parcels were identified in the early 1960s to be residential
properties. Review of historical documents (city directories, aerial photographs, prior
reports, interviews), these parcels were identified to be occupied by either residential
properties or vacant land during the early 1960s and the prior owner is not considered a
suspect recognized environmental conditions.

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 13

4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS

No information indicative of environmental liens, AULs, or governmental notification relating
to past or recurrent violations of environmental laws with respect to the subject property was
reported to Targus by JPMIM or its representative. However, at the request of JPMIM,
Targus obtained an environmental lien/AUL search from Texas Environmental Research.
According to the search, no environmental liens/AULs were identified for the subject
property. A copy of the Texas Environmental Research environmental lien/AUL search has
been included in the appendices.

4.3 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE

Specialized environmental knowledge or experience indicative of possible recognized
environmental conditions in connection with the subject property was reported to Targus by
JPMIM or its representative. JPMIM identified possible recognized environmental conditions
associated with the off-site Exxon station and known releases of petroleum. The Exxon is
further discussed in Section 5.1.

4.4 VALUATION REDUCTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

No information indicating that the purchase price of the subject property was significantly
less than the purchase price of comparable properties was reported to Targus by JPMIM or
its representative.

4.5 COMMONLY KNOWN OR REASONABLY ASCERTAINABLE INFORMATION

No commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the subject property
within the local community that was material to recognized environmental conditions was
reported to Targus by JPMIM or its representative.

4.6 OWNER, PROPERTY MANAGER, AND OCCUPANT INFORMATION

The Client requested that Targus contact Mr. Jennings Glenn of Kane Realty Corporation
(Kane) to obtain information and access to the subject property. Mr. Glenn indicated that
Kane was a representative of the owner of the subject property and had been associated
with the subject property since 1999. Mr. Glenn stated that he had good knowledge of the
uses and physical characteristics of the subject property and is therefore considered the Key
Site Manager. Information obtained from interviews with the Key Site Manager is presented
in Section 7.0.

The owner was identified by Mr. Glenn as NHM OWNER 1 L.L.C. However, the COT search
by Texas Environmental Research identified the following current owners for the various
subject property parcels:

• Parcel: 0376201, 110 Park at North Hills Street - NORTH HILLS EAST OVERLOOK
PARK L.L.C.
• Parcel: 0410669, 141 Park at North Hills Street - PARK AT MARKET RETAIL L.L.C.
• Parcel: 0366506, 4020 Market at North Hills Street - NORTH HILLS EAST MASTER
DEVELOPER L.P
• Parcel: 0306022, 4191 The Circle at North Hills Street - TARGET CORPORATION
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 14

• Parcel: 0303610, 4209 The Circle at North Hills Street - ALEXAN RETAIL AT
LASSITER L.L.C.
• Parcel: 0320423, 4209 Lassiter Mill Road - LASSITER MILL ROAD APARTMENTS
• Parcel: 0051366, 4401 Six Forks Road - LASSITER A AND B L.L.C.
• Parcel: 0326269, 4220 Lassiter Mill Road; Parcel: 0051361, 4381 Lassiter Mill Road;
Parcel: 0051361, 4381 Lassiter Mill Road; Parcel: 0326266, 1261 Lassiter Mill Road;
Parcel: 0326267, 4270 The Circle at North Hills Street - NHM OWNER 1 L.L.C.
• Parcel: 0306023, 4100 Main at North Hills Street - KANE CONCORD HOTEL L.L.C.

At the time of the subject property reconnaissance, Targus noted that the subject property
was occupied by an outdoor retail mall with multiple retail and commercial tenants, as listed
in Section 3.3.

4.7 REASON FOR PERFORMING PHASE I

Targus understands this assessment was required prior to the proposed acquisition of an
interest in the subject property. Targus understands that the purpose of this assessment
was to complete an evaluation that meets the applicable standard of “all appropriate inquiry
into the previous ownership and uses of the subject property consistent with good
commercial or customary practice” with the objective of assembling documentation that may
help to support one of the threshold criteria for satisfying one or more defenses to CERCLA
liability (LLPs4) and to assist the Client in understanding potential environmental conditions
that could materially impact the operation of the business associated with the subject
property (business environmental risk).

4.8 OTHER

Other information that was provided is listed in Section 13.0 and is discussed throughout
this report in applicable sections.

5.0 RECORDS REVIEW

5.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES

Targus reviewed selected federal and state regulatory information in an attempt to identify
recorded information concerning environmental impacts or conditions or concerns
associated with the subject property. Targus reviewed the regulatory report included in the
following table as obtained from Environmental Data Resources (EDR). Pertinent sections of
the database report are attached in the appendices, including a listing of the databases, an
explanation of each database, and figures depicting the approximate locations of regulated
facilities in the near vicinity of the subject property.

Regulatory listings are limited and include only those facilities or incidents that are known to
the regulatory agencies at the time of publication to be contaminated, in the process of
evaluation for potential contamination, or to store/generate potentially hazardous
substances, waste, or petroleum. Those listings are compiled by the third-party information
4 Innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser; see CERCLA
(1980), SARA (1986), “Lender Liability Act” (1996), and “Brownfields Amendments” (2001).
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 15

services provider engaged by Targus, who is responsible for the accuracy and
completeness of its work product.

Federal, State, and Tribal Lists

The following table includes the approximate minimum search distances and a list of the
databases reviewed. These databases were selected based on minimum requirements of
ASTM E 1527-05. The number of facilities indicates the number of regulated facilities
identified by the database provider to be present within the approximate minimum search
distance for a particular database.

ASTM FEDERAL, STATE, & TRIBAL DATABASE LISTS
Database Approximate Minimum Search
Distance
No. of
Facilities
NPL/Equivalents One Mile 0
Delisted NPL One-half Mile 0
CERCLIS/Equivalents One-half Mile 0
CERC-NFRAP Sites One-half Mile 0
CORRACTS or Violators/ Enforcement One Mile 0
RCRA Generators Subject Property and Adjoining 6
RCRA TSD Facilities One-half Mile 0
ERNS Subject Property 0
SHWS/HSDS One Mile 0
SWF/LF Report One-half Mile 0
OLL One-half Mile 0
IMD Subject Property and Adjoining 5
LUST/LUST TRUST List One-half Mile 18
UST List Subject Property and Adjoining 2
VCP/ INDIAN VCP One-half Mile 0
AST/LAST Subject Property and Adjoining 0
LIENS Subject Property 0
Drycleaners One-Quarter Mile 1
Institutional Control/Engineering Control Registries Subject Property and Adjoining 0
Brownfields Sites One-half Mile 0

Targus reviewed the regulatory information provided in the database report to identify listed
facilities located within the approximate minimum search distances. Significant facilities
identified are included in the following table along with their distance from the subject
property, the regulatory database on which the facility was listed, the apparent hydrologic
relationship to the subject property, information provided in the database report, Targus’
observation of the facility during the area reconnaissance (if pertinent) and/or comments,
and whether or not the facility was considered to be a suspect recognized environmental
condition to the subject property. Additional facilities may have been identified by the
database provider but not presented as follows based on Targus’ judgment of significance.
Those facilities are documented for reference by the reader in the appended report.

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 16

Significant Facilities Identified Within Approximate Minimum Search Distance
Facility Name
and Address
~Distance
&
Direction
Database
Apparent
Hydrologic
Relationship
Database Information Additional Information SREC? (Y/N)
North Hills Mall
(NHMOO LLC)
4217 Six Forks Road
Subject
Property
RCRA
NonGen /
NLR, FINDS (2)
On-site RCRA NonGen (Non-Generator)/NLR, FINDS:
• Date form received by agency: 06-16-2004
• Classification: Non-Generator • Historical Generators: Large Quantity Generator (LQG) – 2004; Not a generator – 2003; and
Conditionally-Exempt Small Quantity Generator (CESQG) – 1993 • Violation Status: No Violations Found
Also identified on the
orphan list at North
Hills Shopping Center.
See discussion below.
Y
Brothers Cleaners
4441 Six Forks
Road
Subject
Property
EDR US Hist
Cleaners (2)
On-site EDR US Historical Cleaners (Hist Cleaners):
• Brothers Cleaners (2006 and 2010 – 2012) • North Hills Cleaners & LNDR (2008 – 2009)
Drop off station only. N
North Hills
Cleaners
4421 Six Forks
Road”.
Adjoining
NE of 4421
Six Forks
Road
(Lassiter
District)
RCRA
NonGen /
NLR, FINDS,
Up-gradient RCRA NonGen/NLR, FINDS:
• Date form received by agency: 12-15-1998
• Classification: Non-Generator • Hazardous Waste Summary: ignitable hazardous waste • Violations: Generators (general); Date violation determined: 11-23-1994; Date achieved
compliance: 12-08-1994
See discussion below Y
Brothers Cleaners
4221 Six Forks
Road
Adjoining
NE of 4441
Six Forks
Road (Lassiter
District)
RCRA
NonGen /
NLR, RCRA-
SQG, FINDS,
Drycleaner,
IMD
Up-gradient RCRA-Small Quantity Generator (SQG):
• Date form received by agency: 09-10-2010
• Classification: Small Quantity Generator (SQG) • Historical Generators: LQG (2009 – 2010) and SQG (2005 – 2006)
• Hazardous Waste Summary: spent halogenated solvents
• Violations: No Violations Found

DRYCLEANERS:
• Facility ID: 092-0017
• Status: Monitoring • Shopping Center: The Lassiter at North Hills
• Certified Date: 09-12-2002
See discussion below Y
North Hills Exxon
Service
4359 Six Forks
Road
Adjoining E
to 4220
Lassiter Mill
Road
(North Hills
Mall
District)
EDR US Hist
Auto Stat,
LUST, UST,
Financial
Assurance,
RCRA-
CESQG,
FINDS,
LUST Trust,
IMD
Up-gradient EDR US Historical Auto Station (Hist Auto Stat): • North Hills Exxon Services (2002, 2004- 2005, 2007, and 2009-2012) • Tower Exxon (2003)
• Exxon Corp/Exxon (2006 and 2008)

Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST):
• Date Occurred: 04-17-1998
• Contamination Type: Groundwater/Both
• Product Type: Petroleum • Corrective Action Plan Type: Air sparging and soil vapor extraction
• Notice of Regulatory Requirement (NORR) Letter Issued: 09-26-2011
• Incident Phase: Response

See discussion below Y

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 17

Significant Facilities Identified Within Approximate Minimum Search Distance
Facility Name
and Address
~Distance
&
Direction
Database
Apparent
Hydrologic
Relationship
Database Information Additional Information SREC? (Y/N)
Underground Storage Tank (UST)/Financial Assurance/LUST Trust:
• 1/ 4,000-gallon UST/ gasoline-gas mix/ installed: 04-05-1976/ status: removed/ permanent
close date: 10-30-1986/ construction: single wall steel
• 1/ 10,000-gallon UST/ gasoline-gas mix/ installed: 01-01-1986/ status: current/ construction:
single wall FRP
• 1/ 10,000-gallon UST/ gasoline-gas mix/ installed: 04-05-1976/ status: removed/ permanent
close date: 10-30-1986/ construction: single wall steel
• 1/ 12,000-gallon UST/ gasoline-gas mix/ installed: 01-01-1986/ status: current/ construction:
single wall FRP
• 1/ 3,000-gallon UST/ gasoline-gas mix/ installed: 04-05-1976/ status: removed/ permanent
close date: 10-30-1986/ construction: single wall steel
• 1/ 8,000-gallon UST/ gasoline-gas mix/ installed: 01-01-1988/ status: current/ construction: single wall FRP • 1/ 3,000-gallon UST/ diesel/ installed: 04-05-1976/ status: removed/ permanent close date: 10-30-1986/ construction: single wall steel • 1/ 10,000-gallon UST/ fuel oil/ installed: 01-01-1988/ status: current/ construction: single wall FRP • 1/ 8,000-gallon UST/ gasoline-gas mix/ installed: 04-05-1978/ status: removed/ permanent
close date: 10-30-1986/ construction: single wall steel • 1/ 500-gallon UST/ oil, new/used/mix/ installed: 01-01-1988/ status: current/ construction:
single wall FRP
RCRA-CESQG, FINDS:
• Date form received by agency: 10-27-1995 • Classification: Conditionally-Exempt Small Quantity Generator (CESQG)
• Hazardous Waste Summary: ignitable hazardous wastes
• Violations: Generators (General); Date violation determined: 10-19-1995; Date achieved
compliance: 11-06-1995

Incident Management Database (IMD):
• Date occurred: 04-17-1998
• GW Contam: Yes, groundwater contamination has been detected
• Soil Contam: No • Incident Description: There is free product in 3 monitoring wells • Material: Gasoline
• Source: Leak – Underground
• Sampled by: responsible parties • Samples include: groundwater samples

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 18

Significant Facilities Identified Within Approximate Minimum Search Distance
Facility Name
and Address
~Distance
&
Direction
Database
Apparent
Hydrologic
Relationship
Database Information Additional Information SREC? (Y/N)
Firestone Store
100 North Hills
South
Adjoining N
to 4350
Lassiter at North Hills
Ave (North
Hills Mall
District)
UST, IMD,
EDR US Hist
Auto Stat
Up-gradient UST:
• 1/ 550-gallon UST/ oil, new/used/mix/ installed date: 03-16-1968/ permanent close date: 03-29-
1996/ status: removed/ construction: single wall steel

IMD:
• Date occurred: 07-01-1983
• GW Contamination: Yes, groundwater contamination has been detected
• Soil Contamination: No • Incident Description: Gasoline dispenser • Material: gasoline/diesel
• Source: Leak – Underground
• Incident Phase: closed out • NORR Issued: 03-22-2004
Also identified as 4305
Six Forks Road
See discussion below
Y
Target Store
4191 The Circle at
North Hills
Adjoining S
to 4150
Main at
North Hills
Street
(North Hills Mall
District)
RCRA-LQG Down-gradient RCRA-LQG:
• Date form received by agency: 02-15-2012
• Classification: Large Quantity Generator (LQG)
• Historical Generators: LQG (2011) and CESQG (2006)
• Hazardous Waste Summary: ignitable hazardous wastes, corrosive hazardous waste, arsenic,
barium, various metals, etc. • Violations: No Violations Found • Compliance reviews for 2011 and 2012 did not identified violations at the facility
Target Store is a retail
facility with a grocery
store and limited
quantities of hazardous
substance for sale or
use at the facility. The facility does not have
automotive repair
department, and waste
generation is expected
to be related to photo
development and/or
disposal of off-spec or
damaged products.
N
Miracle Air Duct &
Carpet Cleaning
4208 Six Forks
Road
Adjoining
SW to 110
Park Drive
(Park & Market
District)
EDR US Hist
Cleaners
Down-gradient EDR US Hist Cleaners:
Miracle Air Duct & Carpet Cleaning (1999 – 2001)
The facility was
identified as the North
Hills Mall Office
Building in 1999 city directories. This
appears as a business
office with no reported
on-site dry cleaning
operations conducted.
N

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 19

Significant Facilities Identified Within Approximate Minimum Search Distance
Facility Name
and Address
~Distance
&
Direction
Database
Apparent
Hydrologic
Relationship
Database Information Additional Information SREC? (Y/N)
First Union Bank
4300 Six Forks
Road
150 ft ENE IMD, LUST,
LUST Trust
Up-gradient IMD:
• Date occurred: 01-31-1994
• GW Contamination: No groundwater contamination detected • Soil Contamination: Yes
• Incident Description: Release found during removal of 550 gal diesel generator tank
• Material: gasoline/diesel
• Source: Leak – Underground • Incident Phase: closed out
• NORR Issued: Not reported
• Sampled by: responsible parties
• Samples include: soil samples

LUST, LUST Trust:
• Date Occurred: 01-31-1994 • Contamination Type: Soil
• Product Type: Petroleum
• Corrective Action Plan Type: excavation
• Close Out: 08-11-2004
See discussion below Y
FastLube
4405 Gates Street
300 ft. NW EDR US Hist
Auto Station
Up-gradient EDR US Hist Auto Stat:
• Fast Lube (2002)
Address location is
residential in 2002 and not an automotive
station as indicated
within the regulatory
report.
N

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 20

Significant Facilities Identified Within Approximate Minimum Search Distance
Facility Name
and Address
~Distance
&
Direction
Database
Apparent
Hydrologic
Relationship
Database Information Additional Information SREC? (Y/N)
Lattimore, George
F. Property
4401 Camelot Drive
620 ft N IMD, LUST,
LUST Trust
Up-gradient IMD:
• Date occurred: 05-19-2000
- GW Contamination: No groundwater contamination detected
- Soil Contamination: Yes
- Incident Description: Soil contamination discovered upon UST removal - Material: gasoline/diesel
- Source: Leak – Underground
- Incident Phase: closed out
- NORR Issued: Not reported
• Date occurred: 05-19-2000
- GW Contamination: Yes, groundwater contamination has been detected
- Soil Contamination: No
- Incident Description: (1) 275 gal heating oil UST removed 5/19/2000. Soil contamination
detected in sample collected at closure (8,940 mg/kg) EPA 3550 in sample “S-1”; water
supply well on-site
- Material: gasoline/diesel
- Source: Leak – Underground
- Incident Phase: closed out - NORR Issued: Not reported

LUST, LUST Trust:
• Date Occurred: 05-19-2000
• Contamination Type: Soil • Product Type: Petroleum • Corrective Action Plan Type: excavation
• Close Out: 08-03-2001
• NORR Issue Date: 01-25-2001
Based on soil only
contamination, on-site
assessment for petroleum products,
distance, and
observations, this
single-family residential
property is not considered a suspect
recognized
environmental
condition.
N

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 21

Significant Facilities Identified Within Approximate Minimum Search Distance
Facility Name
and Address
~Distance
&
Direction
Database
Apparent
Hydrologic
Relationship
Database Information Additional Information SREC? (Y/N)
Lambert Property
217 Lynwood
Drive
870 ft N IMD, LUST,
Lust Trust
Up-gradient IMD:
• Date occurred: 08-27-2001
• GW Contamination: No groundwater contamination detected • Soil Contamination: Yes
• Incident Description: one 280 gallon heating oil UST removed; soil contamination detected in
samples: 2,867 mg/kg TPH 3550 in sample CS-1
• Material: gasoline/diesel
• Source: Leak – Underground
• Incident Phase: Response • NORR Issued: Not reported

LUST, LUST Trust: • Date Occurred: 08-27-2001
• Contamination Type: Soil
• Product Type: Petroleum
• Corrective Action Plan Type: excavation • NORR Issue Date: 04-19-2002
Based on soil only
contamination, on-site
assessment for petroleum products,
distance, and
observations, this
single-family residential
property is not considered a suspect
recognized
environmental
condition.
N
SREC-Suspect recognized environmental condition - if yes, see following discussion

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 22

Based on information provided in the preceding table, Targus considers the following
facilities to constitute suspect recognized environmental conditions to the subject property.
Additional information concerning these suspect recognized environmental conditions are
presented as follows. As indicated in the table, the remaining facilities are not considered to
be suspect recognized environmental conditions and are not further discussed.

North Hills Mall (4217 Six Forks Road)
The subject property was identified on the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) and FINDS databases with no reported violations. North Hills Mall Ownership
Organization, LLC (NHMOO, LLC - owner entity) and Dillard’s Dept. Stores were identified in
2000 as Non-Generators. Review of regulatory information indicated that historically,
Oklahoma Installation (store fixtures company) was a Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
generator in 1993 and not a generator in 2003. North Hills Mall was identified as performing
activities as a Large Quantity generator in 2004. The subject properly had no reported
violations. The subject property had extensive demolition and construction from 2000 to
2004 with removal and abatement of asbestos containing material previously identified at
the former mall facility and Lassiter of North Hills. During these times, no suspect tenants
appear to have been in operation to have contributed to the RCRA listing, with the exception
of removal of asbestos containing materials. Based on lack violations, RCRA listing prior to
current developments of the subject property, and removal / abatement reports reviewed,
Targus does not consider the on-site regulatory listings for the subject property to be a recognized environmental condition at this time.

North Hills Cleaners (4421 Six Forks Road)
The former North Hills Cleaners was reported to have operated on the Lassiter District tract
during the mid-1990s. The former dry cleaner was identified as a Non Generator with one
reported violation in 1994 (written violation for lack of a safety/waste management program)
which received compliance in 1994. No other pertinent information was identified within the
regulatory report.

According to Mr. Glenn, the former dry cleaner was located in a prior building attached to
the northeast corner of 4421 Six Forks Road (outside of the footprint of the current subject
property) that was demolished, excavated, and paved to the present parking lot adjacent to
Bonefish Grill. Review of a prior report by ATC in 2004 stated “According to Jeffrey
Tyburske, P.G. of MMA (Mid-Atlantic Associates), this area was excavated down fifteen to
twenty feet during redevelopment activities and no signs of contamination were found. ATC
does not consider the existence of this former drycleaner to be an environmental concern to
the property.” According to Mr. Glenn, no reports were generated for the prior dry cleaner,
but Mid-Atlantic (consultant for the present subject property owner) conducted the
excavation and found no evidence of contamination to warrant further investigation.

Additionally, MW-5 and 6 for the Brothers Cleaners are located within the area of the former
dry cleaner. Chlorinated solvent results from these well did not reveal an increase of
contamination at the former location that would be indicative of a secondary release from
the North Hills Cleaners. According to the DENR, Brothers Cleaners is the identified
responsible party for known chlorinated contamination in the area. No other file information
was found for the former dry cleaner. Based on the on-going groundwater monitoring in the
vicinity of the former dry cleaner, cessation of activities, reported removal of soil with no
reported contamination found, and lack of separate spikes within the PCE plume identified
for Brother Cleaners, Targus does not consider the former North Hills Cleaners to represent
a recognized environmental condition to the subject property at this time.
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 23

Brothers Cleaners (4221 Six Forks Road)
The former Brothers Cleaners, a PCE dry-cleaning facility operated from 1967 to early
2000s in stand-alone building located in the northeast corner of the Lassiter District.
Brothers Cleaners operated as a drop-station in the prior building until it was demolished in
2002 and redeveloped into parking area for the Lassiter District. The present Brothers
Cleaners location on the subject property remains as a drop-station only. The prior Brothers
facility has been assigned DSCA Site #92-0017 by the North Carolina Department of
Environmental and Natural Resources (DENR) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Dry-
Cleaning Solvent Program (DSCA).

Following building demolition, soil excavation was conducted in 2002 in former building and
dumpster locations to remove PCE-impacted soil. Groundwater PCE impacts exceeding
state comparison criteria were present in groundwater. The highest PCE concentrations
were located across the Lassiter and North Hills Mall District of the subject property with the
plume extending more than 2,000 feet south from former cleaner building. In 2011, PCE
attributed to the Brothers release was detected in surface water to the across Interstate
Highway 440 to the south of the subject property.

Targus review the latest available limited groundwater monitoring event from October 2012.
According to the consultant (Hart & Hickman) performing the assessment and monitoring of
the release for the DENR, the primary constituent of concern at the site is PCE, which was
detected in numerous wells at concentrations above the DSCA Tier 1 Risk-Based Screening
Level (RBSL). Trichloroethylene (TCE) has also been detected in a down-gradient wells at
concentrations slightly above the Tier 1 RBSL; cis-1,2-DCE has been detected in a few
down-gradient wells at concentrations below the Tier 1 RBSL. Hart & Hickman further
reported that PCE concentrations detected in August/September 2012 were generally
consistent with or lower than historical concentrations. Additionally, source area monitoring
wells MW-1 and MW-3 on the Lassiter District exhibited a decreasing trend over time.
Concentrations in down-gradient wells at the North Hills Mall District were reported to have
exhibited fluctuating concentrations over time and additional sampling would be needed to
further evaluate concentration trends.

Targus notes that Brothers Cleaners has been identified as the source of the PCE release
and concentrations of chlorinated solvents continue to exhibit elevated levels in groundwater
across both the Lassiter and North Hills Mall Districts. According to Ms. Dianne Thomas,
Project Manager with the DENR for the Brothers release, responsible parties (Oberlin
Acquisition, LLC/ Robert Hilker – President, Brothers Cleaners) are actively cooperating with
the DENR to assess and cleanup the release through the DSCA. Ms. Thomas does not
expect the release to receive closure soon, but did state that if a no further action (NFA)
status is achieved, it would more than likely include land use restrictions, particularly
prohibition of the use of groundwater.

Responsible parties have been identified for the off-site release and active
remediation/monitoring of the release incident is on-going under the supervision of DENR.
Review of available resources has not identified occupants or operations on the subject
property that would appear likely to have contributed to the groundwater impact. Targus
considers the former Brothers Cleaners, and the associated hazardous substances in
groundwater beneath the subject property present a recognized environmental condition.

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 24

North Hills Exxon (4359 Six Forks Road)
Currently, the North Hills Exxon utilizes five USTs at the facility that include one 12,000-
gallon diesel fuel UST, two 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs, one 8,000-gallon gasoline UST,
and one 1,000-gallon used oil UST. The North Hills Exxon facility has a known release with
assessment being supervised by the DENR and monitored by Kane Realty Corporation as
representative for the owner NHMOO, LLC.

Numerous prior assessments and subsurface investigations have been conducted for the
Exxon facility. Review of these prior reports identified that in 1998, approximately two feet
of gasoline free product was detected in the groundwater at and south of the Exxon.
Additionally, the petroleum plume was reported to extend across the majority of the subject
property (North Hills Mall District). Between 1998 and 2001, approximately five aggressive
fluid vapor recovery (AFVR) events were conducted at this facility which removed free
product and water. In 2002, a remediation system involving a combination of soil vapor
extraction (SVE) and air sparging (AS) was installed at this facility. Annual groundwater
monitoring has been conducted for the facility and on the subject property since 2006. In
2011, a new release was identified by the appearance of free product in two of the
groundwater monitoring wells. The release was identified to have been from a pump island
of which was replaced and the release apparently halted, The SVE and AS systems were
again implemented to aid in the capture of free product. The 2012 groundwater report did
not identify free product within the wells sampled but did depict the petroleum plume to
continue to extend under the North Hills Mall District portions of the subject property.

Review of the latest annual groundwater sampling report (dated July 2013 / sampling data
from November 2012), indicated that the groundwater contamination was still present at this
facility and under the subject property.
Targus notes that Exxon has been identified as the source of the petroleum release.
According to Ms. Karen Harmon, Project Manager with the DENR for the Exxon release,
responsible parties (NHMOO and Payne Services, original Exxon owner) are actively
cooperating with the DENR to assess and cleanup the release through the State’s LUST
Trust Fund. However, the facility is nearing its 1.5 million dollar budget for remediation and
monitoring. Ms. Harmon indicated that additional funds beyond the 1.5 million dollar Trust
Fund budget may fall to the responsibility of the owner of the Exxon.

Further, Ms. Harmon reported that the DENR UST Section has no innocent landowner
programs or similar liability protections but, that such protection would not be needed for the
renter/purchaser of a building located over a dissolved contaminant plume clearly originating
from a UST system with a known owner and operator “(the only person that would be held
responsible for the contamination)”.

Responsible parties have been identified for the off-site release and active
remediation/monitoring of the release incident is on-going under the supervision of DENR.
Review of available resources has not identified occupants or operations on the subject
property that would appear likely to have contributed to the groundwater impact. Targus
considers the former Exxon, and the associated petroleum in groundwater beneath the
subject property to present a recognized environmental condition.

Firestone Store (100 North Hills South)
A former Firestone automotive repair facility was located within approximately 50 feet of
eastern boundary of the North Hills Mall District; this area is presently a parking lot. This
facility operated between the early 1960s and 2004 and utilized 14 hydraulic lifts, a 200-
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 25

gallon gasoline UST, and a 550-gallon used oil UST. The USTs and hydraulic lifts were
removed, the building razed, and release incidents closed by the DENR via NFA letters.
Subsurface impact to soil and/or groundwater from the Firestone activities was reported to
have been localized to the Firestone property. Additionally, extensive groundwater sampling
efforts in relation to the aforementioned Exxon and Brothers Cleaners included wells in the
immediate vicinity of the former Firestone. No material impact to groundwater that did not
appear attributable to the Exxon or Brothers facilities was reported in available documents.

Targus interviewed Ms. Karen Harmon with DENR whom indicated that the original release
was discovered in 1983 but was not reported until 2003, after the building and UST system
had been removed. Both JC Penney’s (original owner of the building) and
Bridgestone/Firestone were determined to be Responsible Parties, but
Bridgestone/Firestone did the required assessment and reporting. Soil and groundwater was
impacted but it was reported to have been localized; DENR determined the incident was low
risk as the groundwater contamination was not considered to be a threat to potential
receptors. Ms. Harmon stated that “…if it (groundwater contamination from Firestone) had
appeared to have been co-mingled to the west with the much larger contaminant plumes
from the Exxon release then the incident would not have been allowed NFA”. Based on the
cessation of operations, regulatory closure, interviews, and groundwater sampling efforts in
the immediate vicinity; Targus considers the former Firestone a historical recognized
environmental condition and not a recognized environmental condition.

First Union Bank (4300 Six Forks Road)
The First Union Bank building was identified to have a 550-gallon UST (emergency
generator) that was removed from the facility in 1994. During removal, petroleum impacted
soils were identified and excavated to a depth of approximately 14 feet. According to the
regulatory data, further assessment submitted in August 1995 indicated that “No
Groundwater Contamination detected”. The facility received site closure on January 29,
1996. Based on distance, cessation of activities, and regulatory closure, the former release
is not considered a recognized environmental condition to the subject property.

The remaining facilities identified within their respective approximate minimum search
distance included one or more LUST, IMD, Lust Trust facilities. These facilities were located
at least 850 feet from the subject property in topographically down- to cross-gradient
positions. Based on distance and other facility-specific characteristics, these facilities are not
considered to present suspect recognized environmental conditions to the subject property.

Several other facilities were identified on the database report. Area research did not indicate
that these facilities were located within their respective approximate minimum search
distances.

The database report listed 35 “orphan” facilities (facilities that were not mapped in the
database report due to poor or inadequate address information). The orphan facilities did
not appear to be present within the respective minimum search distances for the databases
listed with the exception of a FINDS listing for the North Hills Mall as discussed above.
Based upon Targus’ area reconnaissance, apparent distances of separation, type of
regulatory listings identified for the listed facilities, and/or conditions typical of the identified
facility activities, the other orphan facilities do not present suspect recognized environmental
conditions to the subject property.

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 26

EDR provides proprietary databases that may identify historical cleaners, auto stations, and
manufactured gas plants that are known to EDR, typically based on city directory reviews
and/or Sanborn Maps. Facilities included on this database typically operated before current
regulations requiring notification/registration. These facilities may not be listed on regulatory
databases but may be suspect recognized environmental conditions due to proximity to the
subject property. Targus reviewed the proprietary databases and four facilities were
identified to be suspect recognized environmental conditions, as discussed above; Brothers
Cleaners (4441 Six Forks Road), Brother Cleaners (4221 Six Forks Road), North Hills
Cleaners, and North Hills Exxon Service. Miracle Air Duct & Carpet Cleaning at 4208 Six
Forks Road and FastLube at 4405 Gates Street are also discussed above in the table and
not considered a suspect recognized environmental condition.

5.2 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES

Targus conducted the following local inquiries to enhance and supplement the ASTM E
1527-05 standard environmental record sources when, in the judgment of the environmental
professional, such additional records were deemed to be reasonably ascertainable; were
sufficiently useful and accurate, and complete in light of the objective of the records review;
and were generally obtained pursuant to local good commercial or customary practice.

Additional Environmental Record Sources/Local Inquiries
Database/Source Entity Facility
Response
Received
Y/N
Pertinent Information
Available
Y/N
Municipal Inquiry City of Raleigh Office of the City
Clerk
Subject Property N NA
Municipal Inquiry City of Raleigh Fire Department Subject Property N NA
Municipal Inquiry City of Raleigh Office of
Planning & Development
Subject Property N NA
County Inquiry Wake County Environmental
Services Department
Subject Property N NA
State Inquiry North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural
Resources
Subject Property

Brothers Cleaners

Exxon
Y

Y

Y
Y-See Section 5.1

Y-See Section 5.1

Y-See Section 5.1

Based upon review of other regulatory information discussed above and in Section 5.1,
findings indicating suspect recognized environmental conditions to the subject property were
not anticipated from the local inquiry(s) presented above.

Copies of the requests and records of communication for these inquiries are included in the
Appendices of this report.

5.3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE(S)

Physical setting sources specified in Section 13.0 of this report were reviewed to provide
information about the geology and hydrogeology of the subject property.

Surface Drainage

Based upon the topographic map reviewed, the subject property sloped to the south toward
an unnamed intermittent stream of Big Branch Creek depicted along the southeastern
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 27

boundary of the subject property. Big Branch Creek, a branch of Crabtree Creek, is
depicted approximately 1,200 feet to the southeast of the subject property and Crabtree
Creek is depicted approximately 3,500 feet to the south of the subject property (see the
Topographic Map in the appendices). The subject property had an average surface
elevation of approximately ranging from 430 to 320 feet above the National Geodetic
Vertical Datum presented on the topographic map reviewed. Observation of the subject
property topography corresponded with information presented on the topographic map.

Geologic Setting

Review of the referenced sources indicated that the subject property is located in the
Southern Piedmont Physiographic Region in an area underlain by the Milton and Raleigh
Belts. The Milton Belt consists of gneiss, schist, and metamorphosed intrusive rocks, while
the Raleigh Belt consists of granite, gneiss, and schist. The Piedmont is characterized by
broad gently rolling inter-stream areas and steeper slopes along drainage ways.

Groundwater

Review of referenced sources indicated the shallowest aquifer in the area is within the
Piedmont and Blue Ridge aquifer formation. The Piedmont and Blue Ridge aquifer is a
crystalline rock aquifer, with estimated groundwater levels of less than 100 feet to greater
than 1,000 feet below ground surface (bgs). The Piedmont and Blue Ridge aquifers consist
of bedrock overlain by unconsolidated material called regolith. Included in the regolith is
saprolite, which is a layer of earthy, decomposed rock developed by weathering of the
bedrock; soil that develops on the upper part of the saprolite; and alluvium, which is mainly
confined to stream valleys and may overlie soil, saprolite, and bedrock. Because the
crystalline rocks formed under intense heat and pressure, they have few primary pore
spaces, and the porosity and permeability of the unweathered and unfractured bedrock are
extremely low. Groundwater can be obtained from two sources: the regolith, and fractures in
the rock.

Review of boring logs for well installation for the subject property and adjoining north Exxon
facility indicated that generally subsurface soils consisted of reddish orange silty sand,
followed by yellow, brown, and pink micaceous silty sand; reddish brown sandy silt with
trace clay; tan and brown micaceous sandy silt; tan, brown, and red micaceous clay silt; tan,
brown, and gray micaceous silt with trace clay; and reddish brown micaceous silty clay from
below concrete to 35 feet bgs.

Shallow (“perched”) groundwater often is encountered in the region at or near the top of
bedrock but, as a result of inconsistent yield, typically is not used as a source of drinking
water. Perched water levels will vary and will depend upon seasonal moisture fluctuations
and local waterway levels. Based on several investigations, Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc.
(Mid-Atlantic) for the Exxon and Brothers Cleaners as discussed in Section 5.1, shallow
groundwater often is encountered at a range of 20 to 35 feet below ground surface (bgs).
The measured groundwater flow direction across the majority of the subject property was
identified to be to the south towards Crabtree Creek.

According to the EDR Well Search information, no water wells were located within one-
quarter mile of the subject property. However, reviewed regulatory reports for the Exxon
facility and Brothers Cleaners identify several private residential water wells in the nearby
neighborhoods. No depth to groundwater or construction dates/information was provided
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 28

but some of the nearby private wells were required by the DENR to be sampled for the
potential to have been impacted. One of those wells warrants additional discussion. A
private well at 4218 Camelot (Samuel Moore residence) would have been located within
approximately 150 feet northwest and up-gradient of the Park & Market District. This well
was sampled in 2004 and again in early 2005 and found to have concentrations of the
petroleum products naphthalene and 4-isopropyltoluene. According to Ms. Harmon of the
DENR, the concentrations were below comparison criteria on the second round and non-
detect during a third round of sampling in mid-2005. The DENR did not require additional
sampling of the well; they opined that the petroleum was not a result of the Exxon release
but likely due to small releases from residential heating oil tanks that had been left in the
ground in the neighborhood to the north. Given the distance from the subject property and
sampling results, it is unlikely that contaminants identified in the Samuel Moore well would
have impacted the subject property and it is not considered to present a suspect recognized
environmental condition.

5.4 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY

Historical sources specified in Section 13.0 of this report were reviewed to assess on-site
historical activities. Targus’ findings are presented in the following table. A 2012 aerial
photograph of the subject property is appended to this report, as are additional aerial
photographs reviewed.

Table of Historical Subject Property Usage
Current Use/Location Prior Use Source Comments
North Hills Mall District
4120, 4150, 4151, 4154,
4158 Main at North Hills
Street

4261, 4217 Six Forks Road

4291, 4270, 4351 The
Circle at North Hills Street

4220, 4381 Lassiter Mill Road

4321, 4350, 4380 Lassiter
at North Hills Avenue
Wooded undeveloped land
single-family residences,
and a possible filling station
Prior to 1940 to 1963

Strip Mall
1963 to 1968

North Hills Mall
1968 to 2000
Demolition and construction
2000 to 2004

North Hills Mall District 2004 to present
A, COT, CD,
GFR, I, PR
The subject property was identified
during the regulatory review for North
Hills Mall at 4217 Six Forks Road. See
discussion in Section 5.1.

A possible filling station was identified on
the 1959 aerial and is discussed below.
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 29

Table of Historical Subject Property Usage
Current Use/Location Prior Use Source Comments
Alexan and Lassiter
District
4421, 4441 Six Forks Road

4209 Lassiter Mill Road
Wooded undeveloped land /
single-family residences
Prior to 1940 to 1963

Strip Mall and Brothers
Cleaners drop station
(Lassiter District) 1967 to 2004

Office Building/Bank/Post
Office (Alexan District)
1967 to 2004

Redevelopment and
construction
2004 to 2006

Alexan and Lassiter District
2004 to present
A, COT, CD,
GFR, I, PR
No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
Park & Market District
141 The Circle at North
Hills Street

110 Park at North Hills
Street
4020 Market at North Hills
Street
Wooded undeveloped land /
single-family residences
Prior to 1940 to 1960s

Wooded undeveloped land,
residential, North Hills Terrance Apartments
1960s to 1982

Wooded undeveloped land,
residential, North Hills
Terrance Apartments,
Portions of Bennigans and
Comfort Inn
1982 to 2006
Redevelopment and
construction
2006 to 2009

Park & Market District 2009 to present
A, COT, CD,
GFR, I, PR
No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.

Subject property building at 110 Park at
North Hills Street appeared to occupy the
parking lot between Comfort Inn and Bennigans.
A - Aerial Photographs COT – Chain-of-Title CD - City Directories GFR – Government File Reviews I – Interviews PR - Previous Report
T - Topographic Map

A 1959 aerial photograph depicts a building near the southeastern boundary of the North
Hills Mall District parcel that by positioning of the building near an intersection and
driveways around the structure has the potential to have been a filling station. Prior
consultants reported a similar opinion. The potential for a filling station to have been on the
subject property presents a suspect recognized environmental condition; however,
extensive groundwater sampling efforts in relation to the Exxon and Brothers Cleaners
(discussed in Section 5.1) included wells down-gradient of the former facility. No impact to
groundwater that did not appear attributable to the Exxon or Brothers facilities was identified
and the facility had been removed by 1965. Based on a lack of regulatory listings,
redevelopment of the area over 45 years ago, and recent groundwater sampling results;
Targus does not consider the former facility to present a recognized environmental
condition.

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 30

No evidence or regulatory listings of fuel oil USTs at the former single-family residences was
identified or reported to be present on the subject property. If single-family residences or
prior on-site structures had been equipped with fuel oil USTs, the tanks would have likely
been removed with the extensive redevelopment (including excavations) of the subject
property areas. Targus does not consider the potential for former on-site fuel oil USTs a
suspect recognized environmental condition.

In addition to the historical information presented in the table above, an assessment as to
whether or not historical uses are considered to present a suspect recognized
environmental condition to the subject property was based on whether or not addresses for
the subject property were listed on the regulatory databases reviewed (Section 5.1),
interviews with local agency personnel (Section 5.2), information obtained from prior reports
(Section 5.6), Targus' subject property reconnaissance observations (Section 6.0), or
interviews with the Key Site Manager and/or owner’s representative (Sections 6.0 and 7.0).
Based on information obtained by Targus and as presented in the above-referenced
sections, other than as discussed above, historical uses of the subject property do not
present suspect recognized environmental conditions to the subject property.

5.5 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION ON ADJOINING PROPERTIES

Nearby property usage could potentially impact the surface and subsurface conditions at a
subject property. Developing a history of past uses or occupancies can provide an indication
of the potential for recognized environmental conditions associated with the subject
property. Historical information specified in Section 13.0 of this report was reviewed to
assess off-site activities. Targus’ findings are presented in the following tables.

NORTH HILLS MALL DISTRICT
Table of Historical Surrounding Land Usage
Current Use/Location Prior Use Source Comments
North:
Parking Lot
100 North Hills Shopping Center
Wooded undeveloped
land and filling station
Prior to 1949 to 1963

Cleared land 1963 to 1965

Firestone Service
1965 to 2005

Parking lot
2005 to present
A, CD, GFR, I,
PR, T
Firestone Service was identified during
the regulatory review and is discussed
in Section 5.1.
East:
Parking lot

Undeveloped land and
residential
Prior to 1949 to 1963

Parking lot
1961 to present

A, CD, I, PR, T
No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
Exxon
4359 Six Forks Road
Wooded undeveloped
land
Prior to 1949 to 1963

Exxon
1961 to present
A, CD, GFR, I,
PR, T
Exxon was identified during the
regulatory review and is discussed in
Section 5.1.

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 31

Table of Historical Surrounding Land Usage
Current Use/Location Prior Use Source Comments
South:
Target
4191 The Circle at North Hills

Undeveloped land
Prior to 1949 to 1963

Strip Mall
1963 to 1968
North Hills Mall
1968 to 2000

Demolition and
construction
2000 to 2004

Target
2004 to present

A, CD, I, PR, T

Target was identified during the
regulatory review and is discussed in
Section 5.1.
Renaissance Raleigh Hotel
4100 Main at North Hills Street

Undeveloped land
Prior to 1949 to 1963

Strip Mall 1963 to 1968

North Hills Mall
1968 to 2000
Demolition and
construction
2000 to 2004

Renaissance Raleigh
Hotel
2004 to present
A, CD, I, PR, T No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
Parking lot

Undeveloped land and
residential
Prior to 1949 to 1963

Strip Mall and parking lot
1963 to 1968

Parking lot
2000 to present
A, CD, PR, T No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
Raleigh Beltline (Highway 1 /
Interstate 440)
Wooded undeveloped
land and residential
Prior to 1949 to 1960
Raleigh Beltline
1960 to present
A, PR, T No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
West:
Single-family residences
4025 to 4121 Lassiter Mill Road

Wooded undeveloped
land and residential
Prior to 1949 to 1960

residential
1980 to present

A, CD, I, PR, T

No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
A - Aerial Photographs CD - City Directories GFR – Government File Reviews I – Interviews PR - Previous Report T - Topographic Map

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 32

ALEXAN AND LASSITER DISTRICTS
Table of Historical Surrounding Land Usage
Current Use/Location Prior Use Source Comments
North:
Alexan Apartments
4209 Lassiter Mill Road

Wooded undeveloped
land
Prior to 1949 to 1963
Cleared land
1963 to 1965

US Postal Service / parking lot
1965 to 2004

Alexan Apartments
2004 to present

A, CD, I, PR, T

No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
Vacant land and parking lot Wooded undeveloped
land
Prior to 1949 to 1963

Cleared land
1963 to 1965

Parking lot
1965 to 2004

Vacant land / parking lot
2004 to present
A, CD, I, PR, T No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
Fire Station
4465 Six Forks Road
Wooded undeveloped
land
Prior to 1949 to 1961

Fire station
1961 to present
A, CD, I, PR, T No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
Single-family residences Wooded undeveloped
land
Prior to 1949 to 1961

Fire station
1961 to present
A, CD, I, PR, T No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
St. Thomas Episcopal Church &
School
St. Thomas Church
Prior to 1949 to present

St. Thomas Episcopal
Church & School
1970 to present
A, CD, I, PR, T No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
East:
Parking Lot
4221 East Forks Road

Wooded undeveloped
land
Prior to 1949 to 1967

Brothers Cleaners
1967 to 2004
Parking lot
2004 to present

A, CD, GFR, I,
PR, T

Brothers Cleaners and North Hills
Cleaners were identified during the
regulatory review and are discussed in
Section 5.1.
BB&T Bank
4460 Six Forks Road

Undeveloped land
Prior to 1959 to 1965

Real Estate offices 1965 to Late 1980s

Bank
1980s to present

A, CD, T

No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 33

Table of Historical Surrounding Land Usage
Current Use/Location Prior Use Source Comments
Vacant Building
4450 Six Fork Road
Undeveloped land
Prior to 1959 to 1975

Bank
1975 to present
A, CD, T No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
First Citizen Bank
4300 Six Forks Road
Undeveloped land
Prior to 1959 to 1961

Cameron-Brown Building
1965 to 2000

First Citizen Bank
2000 to present
A, CD, GFR, I,
PR, T
First Union Bank (aka First Citizen
Bank) was identified during the
regulatory review and is discussed in
Section 5.1.
South:
Parking Lots
Wooded undeveloped
land and residential
Prior to 1949 to 1963
Parking Lots
1967 to present
A, CD, GFR, I,
PR, T
No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
West:
Single-family residences
Various address along Pamlico
Drive

Wooded undeveloped
land
Prior to 1949 to 1961

Single-family residences
1961 to present

A, CD, PR, T

No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
A - Aerial Photographs CD - City Directories GFR – Government File Reviews
I – Interviews PR - Previous Report T - Topographic Map

PARK & MARKET DISTRICT
Table of Historical Surrounding Land Usage for the
Current Use/Location Prior Use Source Comments
North:
Vacant land and parking

Wooded undeveloped
land
Prior to 1949 to 1960s

Residential
1960s to 2006
Vacant land and parking
2006 to present

A, CD, PR, T

No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
Park & Market Apartments Wooded undeveloped
land and residential
Prior to 1940 to 1960s
Wooded undeveloped
land, residential, North
Hills Terrance Apartments
1960s to 1982
Redevelopment and
construction
2006 to 2009

Park & Market
Apartments
2009 to present
A, CD, PR, T No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 34

Table of Historical Surrounding Land Usage for the
Current Use/Location Prior Use Source Comments
Midtown Green Apartments
(under construction)
Wooded undeveloped
land
Prior to 1940 to 1960s

North Hills Terrance
Apartments
1960s to 1982
Cleared land
2006 to 2011

Midtown Green
Apartments
(construction
2011to present
A, CD, PR, T No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
Wooded vacant land Wooded undeveloped
land
Prior to 1940 to present
A, CD, PR, T No suspect recognized environmental
conditions were identified.
East:
Midtown Park and vacant land

Wooded undeveloped
land
Prior to 1940 to 1960s

North Hills Terrance
Apartments
1960s to 1982

Cleared land
2006 to 2011

Midtown Park
(construction 2011to present

A, CD, PR, T

No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
South:
Vacant land

Wooded undeveloped land and residential
Prior to 1949 to 1960s

Bil Few Building/Da Vinci
Building, Simson Hanley
Building
1960s to 2006

Vacant land
2006 to present

A, CD, PR, T

Historical tenants for the Bil few Building and Simson Hanley Building
were identified to be financial, medical,
and administrative office tenants.
Based on review of city directories,
every five years since construction,
none of the occupants’ names indicated
companies that utilized chemicals such
as dry cleaners or printers.

No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
Hyatt House Hotel
160 Park Ave

Wooded undeveloped
land
Prior to 1940 to 1960s

North Hills Terrance
Apartments
1960s to 1982

Cleared land
2006 to 2009

Hyatt House Hotel
2011to present

A, CD, GFR, I,
PR, T

No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 35

Table of Historical Surrounding Land Usage for the
Current Use/Location Prior Use Source Comments
Captrust Tower
4208 Six Forks Road
Wooded undeveloped
land and residential
Prior to 1940 to 1960s

Bennigans and North Hills
Offices
1960s to 2006
Cleared land
2006 to 2009

Captrust Tower
2009 to present
A, CD, GFR, I,
PR, T
Miracle Air Duct & Carpet Cleaning
was identified during the regulatory
review and is discussed in Section 5.1

West:
parking lots

Wooded undeveloped
land and residential
Prior to 1940 to 1960s

Wachovia
1960s to 2006
Cleared land
2006 to 2009

Parking lots 2009 to present

A, CD, I, PR, T

No suspect recognized environmental conditions were identified.
A - Aerial Photographs CD - City Directories GFR – Government File Reviews I – Interviews PR - Previous Report T - Topographic Map

An assessment as to whether or not historical adjoining land use was considered to present
a suspect recognized environmental condition to the subject property was based on whether
or not the property or current and past occupants were listed on the regulatory databases
reviewed (Section 5.1), interviews with local agency personnel (Section 5.2), information
obtained from prior reports (Section 5.6), Targus' area reconnaissance observations
(Section 3.5), and interviews with the site contact and/or owner’s representative (Sections
6.0 and 7.0). Based on information obtained by Targus and as presented in the above-
referenced sections, other than discussed above, prior historical surrounding land usage is
not considered a suspect recognized environmental condition to the subject property.

5.6 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS REPORTS

Targus reviewed portions and excerpts of several prior reports provided by the client,
subject property management, and/or obtained by file review from the DENR. A full list is
located in Appendix G.

Select pertinent prior reports illustrating environmental issues for the subject property and
provided by client, subject property management, and/or obtained by file review from the
DENR are summarized in the following table.

North Hills Retail October 2013
Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 36

Summary of Prior Reports
Consultant/
Report Title Date Pertinent Information Conclusions
GeoTechnologies
Inc.(GTI)/ Phase I
Environmental Evaluation
– North Hills Mall, 4217
Six Forks Road, Raleigh, North Carolina
February 1995 Based on descriptive information (no figures were provided), the property
assessed by GTI appeared to include the North Hills Mall property (North Hills
Mall District and an approximately additional 22 acres of land / parking areas),
which consisted of a two-story retail/commercial shopping center, a two-level
parking deck, and three outparcels (Wachovia Bank, Firestone, and Exxon).

The subject property reportedly utilized hydraulic elevators (number of
elevators was not reported) and one hydraulic trash compactor (located at the
rear (west side) of the mall adjacent to the parking deck). A backup generator
was also located in the JC Penny store. GTI reported no evidence of leaks or
releases from the hydraulic equipment or generator. Under the parking deck at
the rear of the mall was a lawn maintenance area, in which was stored
herbicides, insecticides, and petroleum products. These items were reportedly
properly stored without evidence of release.
At the Firestone outparcel, GTI observed a spill of what appeared to be
hydraulic oil, located adjacent to the 550-gallon waste oil tank. Granulated clay
had been placed atop the spill to contain it, but the clay had not been removed.
GTI reported that Firestone and Exxon utilized USTs. The details regarding the
on-site USTs were reportedly included in pages appended to the GTI report, which were not provided to Targus. GTI reportedly reviewed State files, as well
as interviewed individuals knowledgeable of the USTs, and no leakage
problems or loss of product inventory were known to have occurred from the
USTs.
GTI concluded that they had “found no
evidence during our public record review to
indicate that past or present activities on the
property have (1) led to the deposition of
hazardous waste and/or hazardous materials, or (2) violated environmental regulations.”

GTI recommended that the contaminated
granulated clay be removed from the site and
property disposed. Additionally, GTI
recommended that, due to the presence of
USTs, consideration be given to performing
tightness testing to provide additional
information regarding the integrity of the tanks.
Carolina Environmental,
Inc. (CEI) / Asbestos Floor
Plans – North Hills Mall
November 14,
1996
Based on descriptive information, the only portion of the subject property
included in this document is JC Penny. Asbestos-containing material (ACM)
was identified in 2’ x 4’ ceiling tile on the second floor of JC Penny. The
samples of 2’ x 4’ ceiling tile collected from the first floor and styling salon of JC
Penny tested negative for asbestos. Additional ACM identified at JC Penny
included 12” x 12” beige floor tile (first floor Administration, Locker Room, BLA
Room, and Stockroom; second floor stairwells), and off-white linoleum (first
floor stock room and decorating room).
No environmental conclusions were reported.
North Hills Retail October 2013
Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 37

Summary of Prior Reports
Consultant/
Report Title Date Pertinent Information Conclusions
Withers & Ravenel
Engineering & Surveying,
Inc (WRES) / Limited
Demolition Asbestos
Survey – North Hills Mall
Property, Raleigh, Wake
County, North Carolina
September 21,
2000
Based on descriptive information, the property assessed by WRES
corresponded to the North Hills Mall property, which consisted of five buildings,
a parking deck, and asphalt parking areas. The five buildings included the
main mall building, a maintenance building, a Wachovia Bank, Exxon, and
Firestone. The majority of the main mall building was two-stories, with two
retail stores having a third floor. The remaining buildings were each one-story.

WRES indicated that, due to the date of construction, ACM was not anticipated to exist in the Wachovia building; therefore, an asbestos survey was not
performed in the Wachovia building. Additionally, WRES was not granted
access to one retail area, several storage areas, and several office areas within
the main mall building.
WRES recommended an Operations and
Management Plan be generated for the
property. WRES also recommended that all
friable ACM observed to be in poor condition
be repaired or removed by a licensed asbestos
abatement contractor.
WRES / Phase II Site
Assessment – Brothers
Cleaners, 4421 Six Forks
Road, Raleigh, North
Carolina
November 14,
2000
The Phase II was performed to complete a limited assessment of groundwater
quality immediately adjacent to the on-site dry-cleaning building.

On November 3, 2000, WRES advanced three Geoprobe soil borings (SB-1,
SB-2, SB-3). SB-1 was near the approximate center of the south wall of the
building; SB-2 was near the southwest corner of the building, and SB-3 was
near the northeast corner of the building SB-2 encountered refusal at
approximately 32 feet bgs, and groundwater was not encountered. SB-1 and
SB-3 were terminated at depths of approximately 40 feet bgs, and
subsequently converted to temporary groundwater monitoring wells. The
results of groundwater analysis indicated impact by tetrachloroethene (PCE) to
both soil and groundwater. SB-1 had concentrations of 50.9 micrograms per
liter (µg/L), and SB-3 had concentrations of 518 µg/L. SB-1 also contained 1.3
µg/L of chloroform. WRES noted the North Carolina Administration Code (NCAC) Subchapter 2L groundwater standard for PCE was 0.7 µg/L.
WRES concluded that “the results of our
investigation indicate that impacts have
occurred to the site as a result of historical dry-
cleaning operations. Specifically, groundwater
has been impacted by the common dry-
cleaning solvent, (PCE), at concentrations that
significantly exceed its NCAC groundwater
standard.”
North Hills Retail October 2013
Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 38

Summary of Prior Reports
Consultant/
Report Title Date Pertinent Information Conclusions
Mid-Atlantic Associates
(Mid-Atlantic) / Petition for
Certification into the North
Carolina Dry-Cleaning
Solvent Cleanup Act
Program, Brothers
Cleaners, North Hills
Shopping Center, Raleigh, North Carolina
September 13,
2001
This document outlines the requirements and process to enter the Brothers
Cleaners property into the North Carolina Dry-Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act
(DSCA) Program. Certification into the program requires that subsurface
contamination be confirmed as a result of previous dry-cleaning operations,
which had been done by prior assessment. Brothers Cleaners additionally met
the requirements to be classified as an abandoned dry-cleaning facility because
it was no longer used for active dry-cleaning. Mid-Atlantic indicated the
requirement for an abandoned side included a certification of the ability to pay a $25,000 deductible and maximum copayment of $14,000, for a total of up to
$39,000 out-of-pocket cost. Costs in excess of this amount would be covered
by the DSCA Program. Mid-Atlantic indicated Brothers Cleaners appeared to
meet the requirements to be accepted into the DSCA Program, assuming the
ability to certify they could pay the maximum costs.

This document included a PCE Concentration Map dated September 11, 2001,
prepared by Armstrong Geological & Engineering Services, P.C. The map
shows concentrations of 5 µg/L northeast of Wachovia, 3 µg/L southwest of
Wachovia, a concentration of 45 µg/L between the North Hills Mall building and
parking deck, 0.5 µg/L at the south central portion of the main North Hills Mall
building, and 1 µg/L east-southeast of the parking deck. A plume of “Free
Product” was also depicted originating from the Exxon Station and travelling
between Wachovia and Firestone.
No environmental conclusions were reported.
Mid-Atlantic / Report of
Phase I ESA – North Hills
Mall, 4217 Six Forks
Road, Raleigh, North Carolina
September 27,
2002
The document provided to Targus for review was not the full Phase I ESA, but
a summary of environmental issues provided by Cherokee Investment Partners
II, L.P. (Cherokee). This document was prepared for the benefit of Target
Corporation (Target), and related information as it affected the parcel in which Target was interested, which was not defined in the document. Cherokee and
Kane Realty Corporation (Kane) purchased the North Hills Mall property under
the name NHMOO LLC, and reportedly implemented a comprehensive risk
management program to address environmental liabilities at the property.

Cherokee stated that there was no evidence that environmental matters were
causing harm at the mall or to nearby residents and businesses, and there
were no known environmental suits or claims outstanding against Cherokee,
Kane, or NHMOO. The main environmental issue was reportedly a release of
gasoline from USTs at Exxon, which was in the process of being remediated under a $1.5 million state-funded cleanup program.

Additional reported environmental issues included ACM identified in the mall
(mainly non-friable floor tile) that reportedly would be removed prior to
demolition and redevelopment, “trace levels” of dry-cleaning solvent (PCE) in groundwater along the northern boundary of the property (but not in the vicinity
of the Target parcel) from an off-site dry-cleaning facility, and a historical
service station and drycleaner that were located at the property until the early
1960s.
Mid-Atlantic concluded “we believe that the
environmental situation at North Hills Mall is
minimal and we have effective risk
management controls in place to ensure no impact to Target in their development of their
store at our site.”
North Hills Retail October 2013
Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 39

Summary of Prior Reports
Consultant/
Report Title Date Pertinent Information Conclusions
ATC Associates (ATC) /
Limited Phase II ESA –
Lassiter at North Hills,
Lassiter Mill Road and
Pamlico Drive, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27609
May 1, 2003 Based on figures and descriptive information, the property assessed by ATC
appears to correspond to the property currently identified as the Alexan District,
located at the northeast quadrant of Lassiter Mill Road and Pamlico Drive. ATC
reportedly performed a Phase I ESA of the assessed property on July 23, 2002.
During the Phase I, ESA, ATC identified that Brothers Cleaners operated a full
service dry-cleaning facility from approximately 1965 to 1998 on a parcel
located northeast of the assessed property.
ATC reviewed prior subsurface assessment from Brothers Cleaners in 2000
(discussed above) and from Exxon (not provided to Targus). Files reviewed for
Exxon indicated that PCE and other chlorinated compounds were present in
groundwater monitoring wells located southeast of the assessed property. PCE
was also detected in a surface water body located further to the south. ATC
reported that Brothers Cleaners was accepted into the DSCA program on
September 12, 2002.

ATC reviewed a figure depicting sampling data collected in February 2002.
ATC reported that four monitoring wells and two soil borings were installed in
the vicinity of the former Brothers Cleaners location. Each of the soil and
groundwater samples analyzed returned detectable concentrations of PCE.

As part of the Limited Phase II performed by ATC, borings B-1, B-2, and B-3
were advanced at the assessed property. B-1 was advanced east of the former First Citizens’ Bank, B-2 was advanced south of B-1 near Lassiter Mill Road,
and B-3 was advanced near Lassiter Mill Road and the former automatic teller
machine (ATM). Soil samples were not collected for analysis because,
according to ATC, the borings were located a sufficient distance from the
source area such that soil impact was not a concern. Groundwater was
encountered at a depth of approximately 35 feet in B-2 and B-3. Groundwater
was not sampled from B-1, as probe refusal was met at depths above
groundwater. Groundwater was collected from B-2 and B-3, and analyzed for
volatile organics by EPA Method 8260. Groundwater analytical results
reportedly did not indicate detectable levels of volatile organics in B-2 and B-3.
It should be noted the analytical results were not included in the copy of the
report provided to Targus.
ATC concluded that “the results of the Limited
Phase II investigation did not indicate evidence
of groundwater impact due to chlorinated
compounds at the site. ATC recommends that
no further action be taken.”
North Hills Retail October 2013
Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 40

Summary of Prior Reports
Consultant/
Report Title Date Pertinent Information Conclusions
ATC / Phase I ESA –
North Hills Mall, 4217 Six
Forks Road, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27609
October 12,
2004
Based on descriptive information (figures were not included in the copy of the
report provided to Targus), the property assessed by ATC included the North
Hills Mall District, which consisted of an approximately 23 acre parcel
containing a commercial shopping center with associated office space that was
under construction at the time of ATC’s assessment.

ATC reported that the assessed property was historically wooded and
agricultural land, with single-family residences on the eastern portion of the assessed property. A gasoline station was reportedly located on or near the
southeastern portion of the assessed property until the early 1960s. The
property was developed into a strip shopping center in 1963. In 1968, it was
converted into a mall shopping center, with additional outparcels constructed
between 1964 and 1989. The main mall building was demolished in 2002, with
the exception of the JC Penny portion, for redevelopment of a new shopping
center and office buildings. A drycleaner was reportedly located at the former
mall, northeast of the former Dillard’s store for approximately 3-5 years. The
area of the historical drycleaner was reportedly excavated down 15-20- feet
during redevelopment activities, and no signs of contamination were reported.

ATC identified the most significant environmental issue at the assessed
property to be a release of gasoline from USTs at the adjoining northeast
Exxon facility. The release was reportedly being remediated by NHMOO, and
the case was active at the time of the ATC assessment.
According to ATC, groundwater at the northern portion of the assessed
property was contaminated with PCE originating from Brothers Cleaners,
approximately 1,500-feet north. Brothers Cleaners was reportedly entered into
the DSCA Program. PCE concentrations between 2 and 3.67 µg/L (above the
NCAC groundwater standard) were found in monitoring wells sampled in May
2004, associated with the semi-annual sampling event for Exxon.

ATC identified subsurface contamination at the adjoining Firestone outparcel.
Approximately 10.25 tons of soils were excavated during the removal of a 550-
gallon waste oil UST in 1996. NHMOO reportedly had no known liability
associated with Firestone, and Firestone had received a No Further Action
(NFA) letter from the DENR.

ATC reportedly reviewed asbestos surveys, an O&M Policy Manual, and a
demolition survey for the assessed property, and opined that the asbestos
issues were “being dealt with appropriately.” JC Penny was the only remaining
store at the time of the ATC assessment. ATC reportedly observed signs of
water intrusion throughout the business offices at JC Penny. Water stains were
located throughout the carpeting, and on the lower portions of drywall. Kane
reported two water intrusion events at JC Penny, for which a contractor was hired for cleanup and repair, including air quality testing.
ATC provided the following conclusions:

• Because of the extensive redevelopment
in the area of the historical gasoline
station, ATC did not consider it to be an
environmental concern. • Based on excavation of the area and lack
of reported contamination, ATC did not consider the existence of the drycleaner at
the former mall building an environmental
concern. Targus’ discussion of dry
cleaners identified on-site is included in
Section 5.1. • Although an aggressive remediation plan
had been implemented at the Exxon facility, ATC considered the Exxon release
a recognized environmental condition due
to migration of the plume onto the
assessed property.
• ATC considered the PCE impact to
groundwater at the assessed property
from Brothers Cleaners a recognized
environmental condition. • Because an NFA was issued for the
release, ATC did not consider the
Firestone to be an environmental concern
to the assessed property.
• ATC indicated that the small amount of
asbestos remaining in the JC Penny
building would be abated as
redevelopment of the property proceeded.
• ATC recommended that Kane should
ensure proper documentation is
maintained with regard to the corrective
action and repair relating to the noted
water intrusion at the JC Penny.
North Hills Retail October 2013
Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 41

Summary of Prior Reports
Consultant/
Report Title Date Pertinent Information Conclusions
Mid-Atlantic / Proposal for
Environmental Services –
Firestone Building
Demolition, North Hills,
Six Forks Road, Raleigh,
North Carolina
January 4, 2005 Based on descriptive information, this document pertains only to the Firestone
building. The Firestone building was reportedly constructed in the early 1960s,
and was historically utilized for automotive repair. A 200-gallon gasoline UST
and 550-gallon waste oil UST were also historically utilized at the Firestone
property. The USTs were located on the southeast portion of the facility, and
had been previously removed. An Environmental Investigation Report, dated
July 23, 2003 prepared by Mid-Atlantic, identified the presence of gasoline in
subsurface soils and groundwater from the former gasoline pump islands on the southeast portion of the Firestone property.

Mid-Atlantic reported that previous assessment did not identify other significant
sources of contamination associated with the Firestone facility. However, four
failed hydraulic lifts (out of a total of 14 hydraulic lifts), subsurface floor drain
sump/sediment trap systems, and poor housekeeping practices indicate the
potential presence of isolated areas of subsurface contamination that may be
encountered during demolition activities. Mid-Atlantic indicated the floor drain
system and hydraulic lift systems will need to be decommissioned prior to their
removal. Additionally, excessively stained portions of the concrete floor and/or
sludge residues would need to be removed prior to demolition.

According to Mid-Atlantic, a soil vapor extraction (SVE) and air sparge (AS)
system were in operation at the adjoining Exxon. Several SVE, AS, and
groundwater monitoring wells were reportedly located adjoining the Firestone facility that would require abandoning, modification, or protection prior to
demolition activities at Firestone.

Mid-Atlantic indicated the potential presence of ACBM and lead-paint at the
Firestone building. ACBM likely to be encountered included floor tile, roofing
materials, and transite panels. Firestone also reportedly utilized fluorescent
light fixtures with may have contained PCBs, which would require special
handling and disposal.
No environmental conclusions were provided.
ECS Carolinas, LLC
(ECS) / Phase I ESA –
North Hills East, 18
Parcels, Raleigh, Wake
County, North Carolina
April 12, 2007 Based on figures and descriptive information, the property assessed by ECS
corresponded to the area currently known as the Park and Market District,
which included three parcels of the current subject property (parcels 3, 4, 5, 6e,
7, 8, 12, and 13 of the ECS report). At the time of the ECS assessment, the
property consisted of one single-family residence, five vacant lots which formerly consisted of single-family residences, one vacant bank with associated
offices, one vacant hotel, one vacant restaurant, two vacant office buildings,
one occupied office building, one vacant church, one vacant apartment
complex, and four undeveloped lots. ECS determined the assessed property
was historically agricultural and wooded land prior to development of the structures, which began in the 1950s.

North Hills Mall was reportedly listed in the State Brownfields database due to
groundwater and soil contamination, which originated from the Exxon and
ECS concluded that, “as documented and
qualified in this report, this assessment has not
revealed evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with
the subject property.”
North Hills Retail October 2013
Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 42

Summary of Prior Reports
Consultant/
Report Title Date Pertinent Information Conclusions
Brothers Cleaners facilities. ECS indicated that the contamination originating
from Exxon was migrating toward the southwest, and not toward the assessed
property. The vertical and horizontal extent of contamination originating from
Brothers Cleaners had reportedly not yet been delineated. Additionally, the
presence of 4-isopropyltoluene and naphthalene above regulatory limits was
identified in 2004 and 2005 in a water supply well located at 4218 Camelot
Drive; the origin of the contamination was unknown.
ECS reviewed prior Phase I ESAs for each of the assessed property parcels.
Mid-Atlantic reportedly previously recommended a limited soil and groundwater
assessment be conducted within the Wachovia building (Parcel 6a), where a
250-gallon hydraulic fluid AST utilized with the elevator was located. Mid-
Atlantic also previously recommended a limited soil and groundwater
assessment be conducted near a culvert which drained into a wooded area on
the Episcopal Diocese Church property (Parcel 13). Justification for the Phase
II was not provided.

One AST, presumably containing heating oil, was observed in the basement of
the residence on Parcel 1, with associated piping outside the building. In a
subsequent visit, the AST and product had reportedly been properly removed
and disposed at a licensed facility. Parcels 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6b were vacant land
formerly developed with residences, which were demolished between 2002 and
2007. Parcel 6a was a vacant, three-story Wachovia building. Parcels 6c, 6d, and 6e were undeveloped land. Parcel 7 was a two and one-half story Comfort
Inn hotel. Parcel 8 was a vacant, one-story Bennigans Restaurant. Parcel 9
was developed with three vacant buildings. Parcel 10 was developed with a
vacant three-story office building. Parcel 11 was developed with a two-story
office building occupied by insurance and promotions businesses. Parcel 12
was developed with an apartment complex in the process of demolition. Parcel
13 was developed with a vacant church. Parcel 14 was undeveloped
woodlands.
Mid-Atlantic / Report of
Environmental Services,
Soil Gas Survey – The
Lassiter at North Hills,
4421 Six Forks Road, Raleigh, North Carolina
July 3, 2007 Based on figures, the property assessed by Mid-Atlantic corresponded to the
area currently identified as the Lassiter District. Mid-Atlantic collected a total of
17 soil gas samples at the Lassiter District property. Fourteen samples were
collected at a depth of approximately one foot, while the remaining three
samples were collected at a depth of four to five feet. Two samples were obtained from inside the southern building (Unit 1), and the remaining 15
samples were collected from along the exteriors of Unit 1 and Unit 2 (northern
building). The 14 shallow slab samples were collected under the asphalt in the
parking lot and beneath the top of the concrete floor in an interior hallway. The
three deep samples were paired with sub slab samples on the northern and southern sides of the east corner of Unit 1, and adjacent to the shallow
sampled collected in the interior hallway.

Mid-Atlantic concluded that “test results
indicate PCE and TCE in shallow/sub slab soil
gas samples at concentrations below
screening levels that were adjusted for the
commercial use of the site. Based upon this
information and the general conservatism still
inherent in the screening levels, it is unlikely
that the soil gas concentrations detected in this
study would exceed current EPA indoor air
quality screening levels. “
Mid-Atlantic recommended that the Soil Gas
Survey be submitted to the DCSC Program for
further evaluation.
North Hills Retail October 2013
Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 43

Summary of Prior Reports
Consultant/
Report Title Date Pertinent Information Conclusions
Laboratory test results indicated the presence of PCE in 13 of the 14 sub slab
samples, and each of the three deep samples. Trichloroethene (TCE) was also
detected in one deep and four sub slab samples. Several other constituents
were detected at relatively low concentrations, and were reported to be likely
related to field and/or laboratory artifacts, not associated with the underlying
solvent plume. Concentrations of PCE were generally higher in the three deep
sample locations, as compared to the adjacent paired shallow locations,
suggesting that attenuation of vapor concentrations was occurring at shallower depths.
Kilpatrick Stockton LLP
(KS) / Letter in concerns
for soil vapor assessment,
Lassiter property
November 13,
2007
The letter was provided to give an update on the status of soil vapor sampling
discussed above in July 2007. Mid-Atlantic compared the results of its soil gas
study to a site-specific screening level for commercial uses that Mid-Atlantic
developed in accordance with EPA's Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance.
The results of the soil gas sampling indicated that soil gas levels beneath The
Lassiter are 27% to 77% of EPA's site-specific screening levels. Mid-Atlantic
did not recommend further site investigation nor remediation.
Mid-Atlantic, provided a copy of the prior report
to the DENR DWM. According to KS, “DWM
responded that it would not take any action in
response to the report because the results of
the study did not indicate any imminent hazard
or other actionable information.”
Hart & Hickman (H&H) /
Groundwater Monitoring Report – Brothers
Cleaners, 4221 Six Forks
Road, Raleigh, Wake
County, North Carolina
October 19,2012 This document consists of Groundwater Monitoring Report Forms, as required
by the DSCA Program, and completed by H&H based on a sampling event on September 19, 2012. Sampled monitoring wells were reported to be MW-1,
MW-3, MW-13, MW-13D, MW-14, MW-15, MW-15D, and one additional
monitoring well, the identifier for which was not visible in the copy of the form
provided to Targus. Average depth to groundwater was reported at 33.21 feet
bgs, with flow direction measure to the south.

Groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260B.
Maximum concentrations of PCE were identified in MW-13 in 2009 at 0.74 mg/L
(740 µg/L) and in 2012 at 0.466 mg/L (466 µg/L). Maximum concentrations of
TCE were identified in MW-13 in 2008 at 0.0057 mg/L (5.7 µg/L) and in 2012 at
0.00349 mg/L (3.49 µg/L). Maximum concentrations of cis-1,2-dichloroethene
(cis-1,2-DCE) were identified in MW-15 in 2009 at 0.061 mg/L (61 µg/L) and in
2012 at 0.00236 mg/L (2.36 µg/L). Vinyl chloride had not reportedly been
detected. It was noted that several petroleum constituents associated with the
Exxon release had also been detected, primarily in the vicinity of the Exxon property.

Review of plume maps depicted chlorinated plume approximately 2,000 feet
south and covering the majority of the North Hills Mall District property. The
Exxon and former Firestone areas were exempt in plume description based on
lack of sampling for VOCs within the area.
H&H concluded that PCE concentrations
detected in 2012 were generally consistent with or lower than historical concentrations.
Source area wells (MW-1 and MW-3) were
exhibiting a decreasing trend over time.
Concentrations in down-gradient well MW-13
have fluctuated over time, and the PCE
concentration in 2012 was lower than the
historical high concentration detected in this
well.

H&H recommended periodic groundwater
monitoring using passive diffusion bags
(PDBs) to further evaluate concentration trends
over time.
North Hills Retail October 2013
Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 44

Summary of Prior Reports
Consultant/
Report Title Date Pertinent Information Conclusions
Mid-Atlantic / Draft Annual
2012 Active Remediation
Monitoring Report – 2012,
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills,
Facility ID#: 0-005126,
4359 Six Forks Road,
Raleigh, Wake County,
North Carolina, Incident Number 20113
July 25, 2013 According to Mid-Atlantic, a fueling and automobile repair station has been
operating at this property since approximately 1960. The former UST owner,
Payne Services (Payne), operated the station from 1964 to 2010, when the
property was sold to NHMOO, who now leases the property and USTs to WMB
of North Hills, Inc. A release of gasoline from the UST system was discovered
on April 17, 1998. A Corrective Action Plan (CAP) was prepared by Mid-
Atlantic for Exxon on June 28, 2002, outlining soil and groundwater remediation
activities utilizing SVE, AS, and natural attenuation. The SVE/AS system was installed between November 2002 and June 2003. The remediation system
was turned off between April 2009 and January 2011, since available data
indicated that the free product and benzene Gross Contaminant Level (GCL)
corrective action goals had been met. Localized areas of free product were
identified, and the remediation system was subsequently turned back on from
January to May 2011. Groundwater sampling conducted on July 11, 2011
indicated there had been a new release of petroleum from the current UST
system, in the vicinity of the Lassiter Mill Road pump island. The pumps were
replaced in January 2011 and, available data suggested that the release was
eliminated through replacement of the pumps.

The new release was addressed by the DENR in two Notices of Regulatory
Requirements (NORR) for Investigation and Confirmation of Suspected
Release and Risk-Based Assessment and Corrective Action for Petroleum
USTs, both dated September 30, 2011. Additional assessment and corrective action was taken to satisfy the requirements of the NORR, including an attempt
to advance hand auger borings around the pump islands and free product
recovery including the performance of a 96-hour Mobile Multi-Phase Extraction
(MMPE) event, initiated on March 19, 2012. Zone A of the existing SVE/AS
system included the area of the Lassiter Mill Road pump islands, and this SVE
portion of the remediation system was restarted in April 2012. AS wells AS-1
through AS-8 were also restarted in April 2012. The SVE system was operated
continuously for an approximate five-month period, and the AS wells were
operated for a one week period for each of the five months, ending in
September 2012.

In November 2012, groundwater measurements were collected from selected
wells during the monitoring event. The shallow groundwater flow direction at
the property was generally measured to the south. Groundwater elevations
within the AS/SVE network continue to be variable and did not indicate a uniform water table. This reportedly suggested that the water table in the
AS/SVE network may have not stabilized even though the system had been
turned off for approximately two months prior to the gauging event.

Previous data indicated a notable change in groundwater flow direction on the
southern portion of the site in the vicinity of the new hotel building.
Approximately 100 caissons were installed through the water table in bedrock
Mid-Atlantic indicated that “additional operation
of the remediation system is not warranted at
this time.” Mid-Atlantic recommended
groundwater monitoring for selected monitoring
wells to further establish the following:
• Free product has been removed from the
site;
• Dissolved groundwater concentrations are below applicable GCL’s; That the
groundwater plume is stable or
decreasing; and
• To obtain groundwater sampling data
from selected wells for at least four
sampling events (at least quarterly in
frequency).
The collection of soil samples should be
conducted in areas where previous sampling
(prior to the initiation of the remedial system in
2003) indicated the presence of petroleum
constituents in excess of Industrial Maximum
Soil Contaminant Concentrations (MSCCs).
North Hills Retail October 2013
Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 45

Summary of Prior Reports
Consultant/
Report Title Date Pertinent Information Conclusions
in this area for the building’s foundation. Ongoing evaluation of groundwater
data since the hotel was constructed suggests that the caissons may be acting
as a “dam” causing groundwater elevations to increase up-gradient of the
caissons. In turn, this appears to be causing a more southeasterly shallow
groundwater flow direction around the caissons.

Free product thickness for MW-30 decreased from 1.35 feet (2010-2011) to
0.66 feet after approximately five months of operation of the remediation system. During the MMPE event, a total of 5,905 gallons of water, 25 gallons
of free product as liquid, and 11.29 gallons of free product as vapor were
recovered. Free product was not detected in selected monitoring wells during
the 2012 monitoring event following the combined use of MMPE and operation
of Zone A of the remediation system. Additionally, gauging of monitoring wells
MW-4 and MW-30 on July 19 and 22, 2013 also did not indicate the presence
of free product, indicating the combination of MMPE and operation of Zone A of
the remediation system was effective in removing free product.

Of the seven wells sampled in November 2012, no petroleum constituents were
detected in excess of their GCLs. Several constituents were detected in
excess of their respective ground quality standards (GQS). None of the wells
sampled showed overall increasing concentrations of petroleum constituents
over time. Constituents from the release of dry-cleaning solvents at Brothers
Cleaners have historically been detected in groundwater at this property. Analysis did not indicate detectable concentrations of these constituents during
the November 2012 monitoring event.

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 46

6.0 SUBJECT PROPERTY RECONNAISSANCE

6.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS

Targus visually and physically observed accessible areas of the subject property. The
periphery of the subject property was visually and/or physically observed, as well as the
periphery of structures on the subject property. The subject property was viewed from
adjacent public thoroughfares. In the interiors of structures, Targus observed accessible
common areas expected to be used by occupants or the public, as well as maintenance and
repair areas. Targus also observed a representative sample of tenant spaces. Limitations
imposed by physical obstructions or other limiting conditions included:
• Targus was unable to observe the elevator equipment room and pit for the JC Penny
freight elevator, and the elevator pits throughout the subject property.

6.2 GENERAL SUBJECT PROPERTY SETTING

The subject property reconnaissance was performed by Mr. Christopher Schmitt, a
professional experienced in environmental site assessments, in an attempt to identify
apparent visual indications of present or past activities that have or could have
contaminated the subject property. Targus was accompanied during the subject property
reconnaissance by the operations manager, Mr. Herbert Ubbens. Mr. Ubbens had been
familiar with the subject property for since 1999 years. A Site Plan has been included in the
appendices.

The current use of the subject property was discussed in Section 3.3. A description of
structures, roads, and other improvements on the subject property, if any, was presented in
Section 3.4.

General Subject Property Observations
Description
Reported
or
Observed
On-site
(Y/N)
Comments
(Observations considered to be SRECs are further discussed
after the table.)
Hazardous Substances and
Petroleum Products in
Connection with Identified
Uses
Y Small quantities of paints, maintenance, and cleaning supplies
were noted in the janitorial closets, maintenance office, and
storage rooms. The chemicals were in closed containers without
apparent leakage or spills.

Targus observed large quantities of paints, three fire cabinets of
three-gallon containers of gasoline and diesel, and maintenance
supply chemicals within the maintenance storage room at the
ground floor of the parking garage along the southern boundary of
the subject property’s North Hills Mall District. The containers
were used for lawn care equipment and no leaks, spills, or
releases was observed or noted around the fire cabinets or
containers.

Targus observed one full 55-gallon drum of high alkaline, solvent
based degreaser maintenance storage room. The drum was
located on a spill preventive secondary pallet. Targus observed
limited surface staining around the pallet
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 47

General Subject Property Observations
Description
Reported
or
Observed
On-site
(Y/N)
Comments
(Observations considered to be SRECs are further discussed
after the table.)
Storage Tanks N
Strong, Pungent, or
Noxious Odors
N
Pools of Liquid N
Drums Y Targus observed one full 55-gallon drum of high alkaline, solvent
based degreaser maintenance storage room as discussed above.
The solvent is reportedly completely spent during operations with
no waste generated for removal. Targus observed four empty 55-
gallon drums of the degreaser in a staging area within the ground
floor of the parking garage. No leaks, spills, releases, or surfacing
staining was observed within the area. Based on observations,
non-chlorinated solvent, and no waste generated by use, Targus
does not consider the solvent drums to be a suspect recognized environmental condition to the subject property.

Targus observed 55-gallon drums with the elevator equipment
rooms. The drums were empty and used to collect water from
sump pumps located within the elevator pits, if necessary.

Targus observed two 55-gallon drums as used cooking oil
containers within the Alexan District service area. The drums are
discussed below.

Targus observed one empty 55-gallon in service area behind
Cinelli’s (Suite 4158-103). According to Mr. Ubbens, the drum
had been placed there and had remained for months. He
believes it was owned by Cinelli’s. Labeling indicated it contained
Fruit Punch Drink Base.
Hazardous Substances and
Petroleum Products
Containers Not in
Connection with Identified
Uses
N
Unidentified Substance
Containers
N
Potential Polychlorinated
Biphenyls (PCB)-
Containing Equipment
Y “Dry-type” electrical transformers were observed on various areas
of the subject property. These transformers were in undamaged
physical condition.

Pad-mounted electrical transformers were observed on the
subject property. The transformers were in undamaged physical
condition and displayed no visible evidence of leakage. Duke
Energy was the apparent owning utility and typically would be
responsible for leaks or spills associated with its equipment. The
transformers were labeled as “non-PCB Units.”

Property management reported a grease fire next to one pad-
mounted electrical transformer in 2012. The fire occurred next to
the transformer and the transformer was damaged. The
transformer was replaced by Duke Energy in 2012 and no
releases of oils were identified by property management. Targus
observed the area of the former fire and noted visual signs of a
fire upon the asphalt and concrete surfacing, but noted the
transformer was new without indication of former leaks, spills, or
release.
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 48

General Subject Property Observations
Description
Reported
or
Observed
On-site
(Y/N)
Comments
(Observations considered to be SRECs are further discussed
after the table.)
Hydraulic Equipment Y Hydraulic Trash Compactors
Targus observed hydraulic trash compactors in service and
loading areas throughout the subject property. No leaks, spills, or
releases for the system were reported or observed during the site
visit. Based on observations, the hydraulic trash compactors are
not considered a suspect recognized environmental condition to
the subject property.

Hydraulic Cardboard Baler
One hydraulic cardboard baler was observed in the loading dock
area of the Alexan District building on the subject property. No
evidence of leaks, spills, or releases was observed in the vicinity
of the baler; therefore, Targus does not consider the hydraulic
baler to be a suspect recognized environmental condition to the
subject property.

Hydraulic dumbwaiter
A dumbwaiter was observed and reported within the Cameron
Cloth tenant space. The dumbwaiter was an above-ground
hydraulic pulley system and not considered a suspect recognized environmental condition to the subject property

Hydraulic Elevator
Two traction elevators, which provided access to all levels of the
building for the Alexan Apartments, were observed on the subject
property.

Numerous hydraulic elevators that provided access to the various
floors of the buildings for the North Hills Mall and Park & Market
Districts were observed on the subject property. The presence of
hydraulic elevators presents a suspect recognized environmental
condition and is discussed below.
Contracted Maintenance
Services

Y Lawn care and pest control activities were reported by the site
representative to be conducted by contracted maintenance
services. No chemicals typically associated with lawn care or pest
control activities were observed by Targus during the site
reconnaissance or reported to be present on site by the Key Site
Manager.
Utilities and Stormwater
Management

Y Natural gas was supplied to the subject property by PSNC
Energy. Electricity was supplied to the subject property by Duke
Energy. The City of Raleigh provided water and wastewater
services to the subject property.

Surface water runoff from the subject property was expected to
drain into various storm drain inlets located throughout the parking
lots, parking garage, and on-site streets of the subject property
and into adjoining street-side gutters. Stormwater from
surrounding properties was not expected to drain onto the subject
property. No stains or evidence of improper disposal of petroleum
or hazardous substances noted in relations to the observed
stormwater areas on the day of the assessment.
Other Y Freezers
Targus observed walk-in freezers were located within the subject
property buildings. According to Mr. Ubbens, no Freon was stored
on the subject property and maintenance conducted on the
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 49

General Subject Property Observations
Description
Reported
or
Observed
On-site
(Y/N)
Comments
(Observations considered to be SRECs are further discussed
after the table.)
freezers, including the removal of spent Freon, was performed by
vendors. No Freon was observed to be stored at the subject
property.

Food Grease Traps
Several in-ground grease traps were reported and observed
throughout and adjacent to the subject property, as depicted on
the site plan in Appendix A. Mr. Glenn and Mr. Ubbens reported
that the grease traps serviced the various restaurants. The grease
traps were serviced monthly and/or at 25% full by a licensed
service group. Mr. Ubbens reported that the grease traps function
properly and are well maintained. The in-ground grease traps are
not considered suspect recognized environmental conditions to
the subject property.

Additionally, seven (55-gallon drums and 150-gallon containers)
used cooking grease containers were located in the service and
loading areas throughout the subject property. The used cooking
grease was collected from restaurant tenant spaces at the subject
property. No significant staining was observed in the area of the
used cooking oil containers, with exception of two 55-gallon
drums in service area the Alexan District building, to the rear of
Bonefish grill at the Lassiter District, and rear of Mura at the North
Hills Mall District.

Targus observed surface staining from spills around the used
cooking grease containers. The surface staining was limited and
restricted to the concrete around the containers. While better
housekeeping practices should be employed, due to the
containment to paved areas and type of staining (cooking oil vs.
petroleum or other hazardous substances), Targus does not
consider the used cooking grease containers suspect recognized environmental conditions to the subject property.

Backup Generator
Targus observed a natural gas backup generator on the subject
property located behind Fox and Hound tenant space at the North
Hills Mall District. Based on type of fuel (natural gas),
observations, and lack of reported release, Targus does not
consider the natural gas generator to be a suspect recognized environmental condition to the subject property.

Hydraulic Elevators

Numerous hydraulic elevators were reported and observed on the subject property within
the outdoor retail shopping mall. The elevators were identified as the following:
North Hills Mall District elevators/lifts
• Elevator #1 (Building Elevator) is a passenger elevator that provides access from
parking lot P1 to second floor. This elevator was installed in 2004.
• Elevator #2 (Building Elevator) is a passenger elevator that provides access from
parking lot P1 to second floor. This elevator was installed in 2004.
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 50

• Elevator #3 (Building Elevator) is a passenger elevator that provides access from
ground floor retail to second floor. This elevator was installed in 2004.
• Elevator #4 (Building Elevator) is a passenger elevator that provides access from
ground floor retail to second floor. This elevator was installed in 2004.
• Elevator #5 (Building Elevator) is a passenger elevator that provides access from
parking lot P1 to third floor. This elevator was installed in 2004.
• Elevator #6 (Building Elevator) is a passenger elevator that provides access from
parking lot P1 to third floor. This elevator was installed in 2004.
• Elevator #7 (Building Elevator) is a passenger elevator that provides access from
parking lot P1 to second floor. This elevator was installed in 2004.
• Elevator #8 (Building Elevator) is a passenger elevator that provides access from
parking lot P1 to second floor. This elevator was installed in 2004.
• Elevator #9 (Parking Garage Elevator) is a passenger elevator that provides access
from parking lot P1 to ground floor retail. This elevator was installed in 2004.
• Elevator #10 (JC Penny passenger) is a passenger elevator that provides access from
the 1st floor to second floor. This elevator was installed in 1968.
• Elevator #11 (JC Penny freight) is a freight elevator that provides access from the 1st
floor to the second floor. This elevator was installed in 1968.
• Above ground one-story hydraulic lift next to Fitness Connection. This lift was installed
in 2007.
• Above ground one-story hydraulic lift next to Fox and Hound. This lift was installed in
2006.

Alexan District elevators/lifts:
• Above ground one-story hydraulic lift. This lift was installed in 2007
• Elevator #1 (Building Elevator) is a passenger elevator that provides access from
basement to fourth floor. This elevator was installed in 2006.

Park & Market District elevators/lifts:
• Above ground one-story hydraulic lift. This lift was installed in 2009
• Elevator #1 (Building Elevator) is a passenger elevator that provides access from
basement to fourth floor. This elevator was installed in 2009.
• Elevator #2 (Building Elevator) is a passenger elevator that provides access from
basement to fourth floor. This elevator was installed in 2009.

Property management stated that the elevators function properly and had not been repaired
for fluid loss or removed from service since installation. According to property management,
the elevators were maintained by Schindler Elevator Corporation under a service
agreement.

On-site personnel provided Targus with access to the reservoir/pump rooms, but Targus
was not provided to the elevator pits associated with the hydraulic systems, with the
exception of the JC Penny’s passenger elevator pit. Targus observed that the
reservoir/pump equipment for the hydraulic elevators appeared to be in good condition. Mr.
Ubbens stated that the elevators were installed in 2004 by Schindler (Mr. Ubbens was not
sure of the JC Penny elevators) and that to his knowledge had not experienced leaks
associated with the piston seals. Additionally, Targus reviewed on-site maintenance records
from October 2006 to present, which did not indicate hydraulic oil leaks or releases for the
systems.

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 51

Targus was not able to observe the elevator pit for the JC Penny freight elevator. However,
based on observations of the adjoining passenger elevator pit, maintenance records within
the elevator equipment room, maintenance equipment, and lack of reported problems with
the older freight elevator, Targus considers the freight elevator at JC Penny’s to likely be in
reason equal condition to the other equipment observed. Targus left messages with
Schindler Elevator Corporation for additional information for the on-site elevators. As of the
issuance of this report, a response by Schindler has not been received.

Based on the information provided concerning the elevator construction, that the property
management was unaware of significant releases of hydraulic fluid, the age of the majority
elevators (2004 to 2009), observations, and interviews, the elevators on the subject property
are not considered to be recognized environmental conditions.

6.3 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS

Exterior Observations
Description
Reported
or
Observed
On-site
(Y/N)
Comments
(Observations considered to be SRECs are further discussed
after the table.)
Pits, Ponds, Lagoons, and
Surface Waters
Y Targus observed a detention pond located on the east corner of
the North Hills Mall District. No stains or evidence of improper
disposal of petroleum or hazardous substances noted in relations
to the observed detention pond on the day of the assessment.
Stained Soil or Pavement

Y Surface staining around the used cooking grease container is
discussed above.
Stressed Vegetation N
Solid Waste Y Numerous dumpsters recycle dumpsters, and hydraulic trash
compactors were observed within the in service and loading areas
of the subject property buildings. The hydraulic trash compactors
are discussed above. According to the site representative, an off-
site contractor serviced these dumpsters on a regular basis.
Process/industrial
Wastewater Discharges
N The local municipality has provided sanitary disposal services to
the subject property since its first developed use, with exception
of the single-family residences on the eastern portion of the
subject property. Sanitary sewer discharges were expected to be
consistent with typical domestic wastewater discharges.
Wells Y Numerous groundwater monitoring wells were located on the
subject property (including in subgrade parking garage areas) and
adjoining for on-going groundwater assessments for the Exxon
facility and Brothers Cleaners as discussed in Section 5.1 above.
Septic Systems N No evidence of septic systems was identified or reported to be
present on the subject property. However, during the historical
review, Targus identified that a single-family residences had been
located on-site prior to the current development that may have
been equipped with a septic system. Prior septic systems would
have likely been removed with redevelopment of the subject
property areas, during that 1960s construction and/or during
extensive redevelopment in the 2000s.

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 52

6.4 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS

Interior Observations
Description
Reported
or
Observed
On-site
(Y/N)
Comments
(Observations considered to be SRECs are further discussed
after the table.)
Heating/Cooling Y Electrical heating and cooling units. According to property
management, no fuel oil and/or oil burners remain or are utilized
on the subject property.
Stains or Corrosion Y Targus observed oil staining within the maintenance storage room
at the ground floor of the parking garage along the southern
boundary of the subject property’s North Hills Mall District. The oil
staining appeared to be from equipment and vehicle maintenance
of carts and four wheelers within the storage room. The staining
was limited to and restricted to the concrete. Based on
observations, Targus considers the surface oil staining observed
to be a de minimis condition and not a recognized environmental
condition to the subject property at this time.
Drains and Sumps

Y Sumps were observed within the concrete loading dock areas, the
ground floor of the parking garage, and within the elevator pits.
According to Mr. Ubbens the sumps identified for the concrete
loading dock areas and the ground floor of the parking garage
were reported to be directed to the sanitary sewer. Mr. Ubbens
stated that the sumps were functioning with no reported problems
like spills or releases had occurred in the sump areas.
Additionally, the sumps for the elevator pits were directed to 55-
gallon drums within the elevator equipment rooms.

Drains were observed and reported throughout the subject
property building within janitorial closets, kitchens, bathrooms,
common areas, and the parking garage. Targus did not observe
stains; strong, pungent, or noxious odors; or evidence of improper
disposal of material associated with these drains.

7.0 INTERVIEWS

ASTM E 1527-05 requires that a reasonable attempt be made to interview past and present
owners, operators, and occupants who are likely to have material information about uses
and conditions that could present a suspect recognized environmental condition to the
subject property. ASTM E 1527-05 requires that the owner or its representative be asked to
identify a person with good knowledge of the uses and physical characteristics of the subject
property who is defined as the Key Site Manager. The interviews were conducted in person,
by telephone, or in writing and are discussed in the following table.
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 53

Name/
Company
Title/
Position Comments
Past
Owner/
Occupant
The prior owner of the subject property was not available.
Mr.
Jennings
Glenn /

Kane
Realty
Corp.
Manager

Key Site
Manager
Targus interviewed the Key Site Manager. Information provided is included in
relevant sections of this report. No information regarding environmental liens, AULs,
or governmental notification relating to past or recurrent violations of environmental
laws with respect to the subject property were reported to Targus during this
interview. Targus inquired whether the Key Site Manager was aware of (1) any
pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum
products in, on, or from the property; (2) any pending, threatened, or past
administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products
in, on or from the subject property; or (3) any notices from governmental entities
regarding possible violations of environmental laws or possible liabilities relating to
hazardous substances or petroleum products. Targus also requested whether the
Key Site Manager could provide helpful documents such as those specified in
Section 10.8 of ASTM E 1527-05 and as listed in the appendices. Documents
provided by the Key Site Manager are listed in Section 13.0.
Mr.
Herbert
Ubbens /
Kane
Realty
Corp.
Operations
Manager
Information obtained from interviews and contact with Mr. Ubbens is discussed
presented in pertinent sections of this report.
Ms. Diane
Thomas

DENR
Project
Manager
Information obtained from interviews and contact with Ms. Thomas is discussed
presented in pertinent sections of this report.
Ms. Karen
Harmon

DENR
Project
Manager
Information obtained from interviews and contact with Ms. Harmon is discussed
presented in pertinent sections of this report.
Local Gov.
Officials
Information obtained from interviews and contact with local governmental officials is
discussed presented in pertinent sections of this report.
Occupants Multiple tenants occupied the subject property at the time of Targus’ assessment. A
list of tenants is included in Section 3.3. Information from tenants is presented in
pertinent sections of this report.
Individuals
interviewed
for prior
ESAs
Targus reviewed prior reports that contained documentation of interviews with
individuals familiar with the subject property. In accordance with ASTM E 1527-05,
these individuals were not questioned concerning information already discussed.
Information obtained from the prior interviews is presented in Section 5.6. Targus
also interviewed certain individuals to obtain information concerning conditions at the
subject property since the prior interview. This information is presented in pertinent
sections of this report.

Records of communication for the interviews conducted are provided in the appendices.

8.0 FINDINGS

Based on the information obtained by Targus to date, known or suspect recognized environmental conditions associated with the subject property, including historical
recognized environmental conditions, de minimis conditions, and other environmental
conditions, are summarized as follows:

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 54

Description (Address) Location Section (s)
Discussed
North Hills Mall Regulatory Listings (4217
Six Forks Road)
North Hills Mall District 5.1
Possible Former Filling Station North Hills Mall District 5.4
Hydraulic Elevators Alexan, North Hills Mall, and Park & Market
Districts
6.2
Maintenance Storage Room Staining North Hills Mall District 6.4
Brothers Cleaners (4221 Six Forks Road) Adjoining NE of Lassiter District 5.1
North Hills Cleaners (4421 Six Forks Road) Adjoining NE of Lassiter District 5.1
North Hills Exxon (4359 Six Forks Road) Adjoining N of North Hills Mall District 5.1
Firestone Store (100 North Hills South) Adjoining N of North Hills Mall District 5.1
First Union Bank (4300 Six Forks Road) 150 ft E 5.1

9.0 OPINION

Based on the information obtained by Targus to date, the following summarizes Targus’
opinion of the impact on the subject property of known or suspect recognized environmental
conditions identified in Targus’ findings (Section 8.0) and the environmental professional’s
rationale for concluding that a condition is currently a recognized environmental condition, historical recognized environmental condition, de minimis condition, or not a recognized
environmental condition.

Description
(Address) Opinion
North Hills Mall
Regulatory Listings
(4217 Six Forks Road)
Based on lack violations, RCRA listing prior to current developments of
the subject property, and removal / abatement reports review, Targus
does not consider the on-site regulatory listings for the subject property to
be a recognized environmental condition at this time.
Possible Former Filling
Station
(North Hills Mall
District)
Based on a lack of regulatory listings, redevelopment of the area over 45
years ago, and recent groundwater sampling results; Targus does not
consider the former facility to present a recognized environmental
condition.
Hydraulic Elevators Based on the information provided concerning the elevator construction,
that the property management was unaware of significant releases of
hydraulic fluid, the age of the majority elevators (2004 to 2009),
observations, and interviews, the elevators on the subject property are
not considered to be recognized environmental conditions.
Maintenance Storage
Room Staining
The staining was limited to and restricted to the concrete. Based on
observations, Targus considers the surface oil staining observed to be a de minimis condition and not a recognized environmental condition to the
subject property at this time.
Brothers Cleaners
(4221 Six Forks Road)
Responsible parties have been identified for the off-site release and
active remediation/monitoring of the release incident is on-going under
the supervision of DENR. Review of available resources has not identified
occupants or operations on the subject property that would appear likely
to have contributed to the groundwater impact. Targus considers the
former Brothers Cleaners, and the associated hazardous substances in
groundwater beneath the subject property present a recognized environmental condition.
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 55

Description
(Address) Opinion
North Hills Cleaners
(4421 Six Forks Road)
Based on the on-going groundwater monitoring in the vicinity of the
former dry cleaner, cessation of activities, reported removal of soil with no
reported contamination found, and lack of separate spikes within the PCE
plume identified for Brother Cleaners, Targus does not consider the
former North Hills Cleaners to represent a recognized environmental condition to the subject property at this time.
North Hills Exxon
(4359 Six Forks Road)
Responsible parties have been identified for the off-site release and
active remediation/monitoring of the release incident is on-going under
the supervision of DENR. Review of available resources has not identified
occupants or operations on the subject property that would appear likely
to have contributed to the groundwater impact. Targus considers the
former Exxon, and the associated petroleum in groundwater beneath the
subject property to present a recognized environmental condition.
Firestone Store (100
North Hills South)
Based on the cessation of operations, regulatory closure, interviews, and
groundwater sampling efforts in the immediate vicinity; Targus considers
the former Firestone a historical recognized environmental condition and
not a recognized environmental condition.
First Union Bank
(4300 Six Forks Road)
Based on distance, cessation of activities, and regulatory closure, the
former release is not considered a recognized environmental condition to
the subject property.

10.0 CONCLUSIONS

10.1 ASTM ISSUES

Targus has performed a Phase I ESA of the North Hills Retail property, located at 4217 Six
Forks Road in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina in general conformance with the scope
and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-05. Exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice
are described in Section 11.0 of this report.

Based upon the information obtained, as reflected in this report, this assessment has
revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject
property except as follows:

• The adjacent Exxon and Brothers Cleaners facilities and their associated petroleum
and/or chlorinated solvent-impacted groundwater that has migrated under the subject
property.

Given the off-site nature of the release incidents and in consideration that the responsible
parties are cooperating with the DENR to assess and remediate the impact, it is Targus’
opinion that additional information is not warranted to obtain greater certainty regarding the
identified recognized environmental condition.

Targus notes that agreements between the responsible parties and the DENR through the
Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act have afforded certain liability protections to affected non-
source property owners so long as assessment and monitoring activities are not impeded
and contingent upon certain other conditions. As allowed by the statutes, liability protections
may also be provided to future owners of contaminated down-gradient properties (such as
portions of the subject property) in appropriate circumstances.
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 56

Additionally, according to Ms. Karen Harmon, Project Manager with the DENR for the Exxon
release, responsible parties (NHMOO and Payne Services, original Exxon owner) are
actively cooperating with the DENR to assess and cleanup the release through the State’s
Trust Fund for LUSTs. Further, Ms. Harmon reported that the DENR UST Section has no
innocent landowner programs or similar liability protections but, that such protection would
not be needed for the renter/purchaser of a building located over a dissolved contaminant
plume clearly originating from a UST system with a known owner and operator “(the only
person that would be held responsible for the contamination)”.

With regard to both the Exxon and Brothers Cleaners releases, Targus understands that
JPMIM will confirm with counsel the organization of business partnerships to confirm
continued applicability of liability protections to future owning entities.

Targus also recommends better housekeeping practices in regards to the observed surface
staining from spills around the used cooking grease containers at various locations around
the subject property as well as to prevent additional motor oil spills or staining in
maintenance areas.

10.2 NON-ASTM ISSUES

In accordance with the proposed scope of work, Targus included certain non-ASTM scope
considerations as discussed in Section 12.0 of this report. Based on Targus’ understanding
of the Client’s objectives, risk tolerance, and future plans for the subject property, this
assessment/review did not identify business environmental risk associated with the non-
ASTM items; however, this conclusion is specifically conditional on proper future
management of ACM and suspect ACM in accordance with applicable regulations. Targus
has found that written O&M programs assist owners in maintaining compliance with these
regulations.

Targus recommends a written O&M program be prepared and implemented for the subject
property.

11.0 DATA GAPS AND DEVIATIONS

Data gaps are defined as a lack of or inability to obtain information required by ASTM E
1527-05 despite good faith efforts. Data gaps identified are discussed below and were not
considered to be significant data gaps that affected the ability of the environmental
professional to identify recognized environmental conditions. Known deviations or deletions
from the scope of work defined by ASTM E 1527-05 were not intentionally made.

• Data failure (a type of data gap) was encountered during the historical review of the
subject property. The historical use and occupancy of the subject property could not
be documented prior to 1949 or from the first developed use of the subject property.
Historical data sources may have had gaps of greater than a five-year interval.
Targus does not consider the data failure discussed above to present a significant
data gap.
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 57

12.0 Non-ASTM SCOPE ITEMS

In accordance with the scope of work presented in the proposal, Targus has included certain
non-ASTM scope considerations as presented in this section of the report.

12.1 ASBESTOS

A visual asbestos survey of the subject property was performed on October 1, 2013 by Mr.
Christopher Schmitt, an EPA-certified asbestos inspector experienced in regulations and
procedures governing asbestos. This survey consisted of a walk-through of limited building
areas, observation, of suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACM). On-site personnel
provided access to the areas observed by Targus. No asbestos O&M program was provided
or reported to exist for the subject property by Mr. Jennings Glenn and/or property
management.

The limited asbestos survey scope of work was intended to identify the potential presence of
major classes of accessible ACM at the subject property and addresses very limited
objectives relating to the characterization of asbestos within the project. Estimation and
determination of exact quantities and locations of these materials at the subject property
was beyond the scope of this survey. These data alone are not appropriate for planning
specific response actions or for health hazard assessment, nor are they sufficient for
renovation or demolition activities. In the event renovation or demolition activities are
planned, a comprehensive asbestos survey would be required prior to initiation of such
activities.

The subject property consisted of an outdoor retail mall. Improvements included 15 buildings
of retail, second/third floor offices, multiple outparcels, surface lots and parking decks. The
majority of the subject property was constructed from 2004 to 2009. The building at 4421
Six Forks Road in the Lassiter District was constructed in the 1960s and was reported by
Mr. Glenn as “stripped down to bare structure. Any asbestos would have been removed
during demo”. Additionally, The JC Penney store and associated parking structure on the
North Hills Mall District parcel were constructed in 1968. Multiple asbestos
surveys/abatements have taken place at the JC Penny and North Hills Mall. Review of
asbestos abatement report for JC Penny reports that identified ACM from prior assessments
was removed during renovation activities; however, during Targus’ site visit, suspect ACM
materials were observed.

Suspect ACM observed in the on-site buildings on the day of the assessment included
various wall and ceiling systems (including wallboard, joint compound and texture),
numerous colors and patterns of sheet flooring (linoleum) and floor tile with floor tile mastic,
caulking, spray-applied fire proofing, and ceiling tiles. On the exterior of the improvements
Targus observed suspect ACM including roofing materials and stucco plaster. The suspect
ACM was observed by Targus to be in good condition and non-friable. Regardless of past
renovations and in the absence of data to the contrary, Targus cannot rule out ACM
remaining at the subject property.

Although testing was not conducted, in buildings of similar age and type of construction the
presence of large quantities of asbestos in major suspect materials is uncommon.
Notwithstanding date of construction or likelihood of asbestos, the National Emission
Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations consider certain building
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 58

materials that have not been thoroughly tested to be suspect ACM regardless. Such
materials number in excess of 30,000 products, but those commonly encountered in modern
building systems include flooring materials, mastics, sealants, finish textures, ceiling tiles,
non-fiberglass thermal and other insulation, roofing components, and fireproofing. NESHAP
regulations require that all ACM be identified prior to potential disturbance of suspect ACM
such as demolition or renovation activities. The limited asbestos survey performed as part of
this project was not intended to meet the performance standard established under NESHAP
regulations for demolition and renovation.

Based on the good condition of the suspect ACM identified, asbestos is not considered to be
a business environmental risk to the subject property at this time. However, the asbestos
survey was not comprehensive and should not be relied upon in preparation of renovation or
demolition projects. Prior to demolition/renovation activities or other activities that could
potentially disturb suspect ACM, additional sampling and analysis of the materials using
protocols specified in AHERA (40 CFR 763) should be performed. Alternatively, the material
can be assumed to contain asbestos and treated accordingly. Future activities that involve
the disturbance or removal of suspect ACM are required to be conducted in accordance with
NESHAP and other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. Targus has found that
written O&M programs can assist owners in maintaining compliance with these applicable
regulations. As mentioned above, an O&M Program was not reported to have been
prepared for the subject property. Targus recommends a written O&M program be prepared
and implemented for the subject property.

12.2 RADON

Radon (Rn222) is a naturally occurring inert, colorless, odorless radioactive gas derived from
the decay of radium (Ra226). Radium occurs in geologic formations containing uranium,
granite, shale, phosphate, or pitchblende and was commercially used in luminescent
products. Radium decays into reactive, radioactive daughter particles that attach themselves
to other particles such as dust and are a lung cancer risk. Radon can move through
permeable rocks and soils and can eventually seep into buildings. The movement of radon
into buildings is controlled largely by the soil permeability under a foundation and access to
the interior of buildings through openings in the foundation.

According to the EPA Map of Radon Zones and the EDR-Radius Map with Geocheck, Wake
County was located in EPA Radon Zone 2 (average indoor levels greater than 2 and less
than 4 picoCuries per liter [(pCi/L]). Based upon published information and non-residential
site usage, radon does not appear to present a business environmental risk to the subject
property.

12.3 LEAD-BASED PAINT

Based upon the recent construction and/or renovation dates of the on-site improvements
(2004 through 2009), and in consideration that the subject property was commercially
occupied with no on-site residents, a survey for lead-based paint was not conducted per the
client scope of work.

12.4 LEAD-IN-DRINKING WATER

Drinking water for the subject property was supplied by the City of Raleigh. Targus reviewed
the consumer confidence water system report for water distributed by this system. Data
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 59

published since 2012 did not identify health-based violations associated with lead-in-drinking
water supplied by this system. Because the subject property was commercially occupied with
no on-site residents, no lead-in-drinking water testing was called for by JPMIM’s scope of
work, and no testing was conducted.

12.5 WETLANDS

During the subject property reconnaissance no on-site marshy areas, ponds of water, low-
lying areas, or streams were identified. It was noted that the subject property was paved or
covered by buildings with the exception of small landscaped areas. A detention pond for
stormwater control was observed on the eastern corner of the North Hills Mall District.
Review of historical aerial photographs, topographic maps, and the United Stated Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map did not indicate the
presence of wetlands, ponds, or streams located on the subject property. Based on the
review of this information, there is a low probability that wetlands are located on the subject
property.

12.6 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

The subject property was utilized as mixed-use commercial retail center and did appear to
engage in environmentally related activities that would require a permit at the time of the
assessment. The following authorities were identified to have authority over certain
environmental matters that may be pertinent at, and in proximity to, the subject property:

City of Raleigh Fire Department [phone]
City of Raleigh Public Works [phone]
City of Raleigh Health Department [phone]
City of Raleigh Planning & Development [phone]
Wake County Environmental Health [phone]
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources [phone]

It should be noted that Exxon and Brothers Cleaners groundwater monitoring is currently
being conducted on-site and supervised by DENR. DENR identified responsible parties for
the off-site sources of release, but regulatory requirements will require the subject property
owners to allow access to the property and not impede with on-going and future monitoring,
assessments, or remediation efforts.

12.7 CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES

The subject property was developed with mixed-use commercial retail facilities in the early
1960s when the property was converted to a shopping mall. A review of the North Carolina
Office of Archives & History, the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office, North
Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, and the North Carolina Division of Historical
Resources websites did not identify significant archaeological sites, historic structures, or
other known cultural resources in the vicinity of the subject property. Based on this
information, the project will likely have no affect on significant cultural resources.
North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 60

12.8 ENDANGERED SPECIES

Based upon subject property and area development and Targus’ review of the available
published information and inquiries, the potential for endangered species to be present at
the subject property is low.

12.9 IAQ/MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION

The on-site building was newly-constructed and/or renovated North Hills Retail. During the
subject property reconnaissance, Targus’ representative did not note indications of potential
air quality concerns/microbial contamination (such as odors and/or water intrusion).

A prior report by ATC in 2004 reported that water damage was observed in the bottom floor
of the JC Penney and along the eastern edge of the building. A musty odor was present, the
floor and carpeting had water damage, and the baseboards had been removed. ATC
reported no signs of mold. Water damage was also noted throughout the office area
ceilings where past water intrusion has stained the ceilings. Possible mold was noted
around the edges of some of the damaged areas. During Targus’ assessment, no mold or
water damaged materials appeared to remain within the prior identified areas or other areas
observed by Targus. According to Mr. Ubbens, there were no mold or water intrusion
problems presently at the subject property and property management has an immediate
response to possible mold and/or water leaks within the buildings.

Provided that future maintenance includes timely and pro-active identification of moisture
intrusion and vigorous response to fungal growth and tenant complaints and cleaning,
repair, or replacement of affected building material in accordance with an accepted standard
industry practice, mold growth at the subject property is not considered to constitute a
business environmental risk.

12.10 HIGH-VOLTAGE POWER LINES

No high-power transmission lines were noted within a 500-foot approximate minimum
search distance of the subject property. Above-ground electric supply lines were observed
along the southern and western boundaries of the subject property. Based on the absence
of major transmission lines in close proximity and non-residential occupancy, an
electromotive force (EMF) survey was not indicated and was not conducted.

13.0 REFERENCES

• Raleigh West, North Carolina, Quadrangle, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 minute
series Topographic Map, photorevised 2013;

• Soil Survey of Wake County, North Carolina, United States Department of Agriculture,
Natural Resources Conservation Service, dated 1980;

• EDR-Radius Map with Geocheck, North Hills Retail, 4217 Six Forks Road, Inquiry
Number 3740406.2s, dated September 26, 2013;

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 61

• Aerial photographs purchased from EDR, dated 1959, 1965, 1971, 1983, 1993, 2008,
and 2012;

• Aerial photograph obtained from Google Earth, dated 2010;

• Haines and Polk City Directories, dated 1961, 1965, 1969, 1974, 1979, 1984, 1989,
1994, 1999, 2004, and 2008, reviewed at the Olivia Raney Local History Library;

• Historical Fire Insurance Maps were requested from EDR. According to EDR, no
Historical Fire Insurance Maps were available for the subject property;

• Environmental Lien Search performed by Texas Environmental Research, dated
October 6, 2013;

• USFWS NWI map, obtained online at http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html;

• EPA Map of Radon Zones, viewed online at http://www.epa.gov/radon/zonemap.html;

• Land Lease Plan Map, North Hills East, prepared by Integrated Design, 2012;

• Land Lease Plan Map, North Hills South, prepared by Integrated Design, 2012;

• Land Lease Plan Map, North Hills North, prepared by Integrated Design, 2012;

• ALTA/ASCM Title Survey in North Hills, 4217 Six Forks Road, dated December 14,
2004;

• Interviews with Mr. Jennings Glenn of Kane Realty Corporation and Key Site Manager;

• Interviews with Mr. Herbert Ubbens, Operations Manager for the subject property;

• Interviews with Ms. Dianne Thomas, Project Manager, Dry Cleaning Solvent Cleanup
Program, Division of Waste Management for the DENR;

• Interviews with Ms. Karen Harmon, Hydrogeologist, Underground Storage Tank
Department, Division of Waste Management for the DENR;

• Open records request submitted to Wake County Environmental Services;

• Open records request submitted to City of Raleigh Office of the City Clerk;

• Open records request submitted to City of Raleigh Office of Planning & Development;

• Open records request submitted to the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources;

North Hills Retail October 2013 Targus Project No. T13-2754 Page 62

14.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S)

I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of an
environmental professional as defined in Section 312.10 of 40 CFR 312, and I have the
specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of
the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I have developed and performed the
all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR
Part 312.
Christopher Schmitt
Environmental Professional

15.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S)

In accordance with ASTM E 1527-05, this report includes the qualifications of the
environmental professional, and the qualifications of the personnel conducting the site
reconnaissance and interviews, if conducted by someone other than an environmental
professional. These qualifications are documented in the appendices. A Statement of
Qualifications for the company has not been included with this report but can be provided
upon request.

Appendices

This copy of the report is not exhaustive. The full version of this
assessment may include additional appendix materials that are not
contained herein due to practical or technological limitations.
Those additional materials are available to the Client and relying
parties on request and are hereby incorporated by reference.
November 24, 2014
Mr. Jennings Glenn
Kane Realty Corporation
Post Office Box 19107
Raleigh, North Carolina 27619
Subject: ANNUAL 2014 ACTIVE REMEDIATION MONITORING REPORT
EXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS
FACILITY ID#: 0-005126
4359 SIX FORKS ROAD
RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
INCIDENT NUMBER 20113
MID-ATLANTIC JOB NO. 000R1169.20
Dear Mr. Glenn:
Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc. (Mid-Atlantic) is pleased to submit the enclosed Active
Remediation Monitoring Report. In accordance with regulatory requirements, Mid-Atlantic
has submitted a copy of this report to the Raleigh Regional Office of the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Waste Management,
Underground Storage Tank Section for agency review and comment.
Mid-Atlantic appreciates the opportunity to provide environmental services to you for this
project. If you have any questions, please contact us at 250-9918.
Sincerely,
MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
Jeffrey Tyburski, PG, RSM
Senior Geologist
LTM/O&M Projects/1169_20/2014Monitoring Report /JT/jnc
November 24, 2014
Ms. Karen Harmon
Raleigh Regional Office
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management, UST Section
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
Subject: ANNUAL 2014 ACTIVE REMEDIATION MONITORING REPORT
REQUEST FOR NO FURTHER ACTION STATUS
EXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS
FACILITY ID#: 0-005126
4359 SIX FORKS ROAD
RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
INCIDENT NUMBER 20113
MID-ATLANTIC PROJECT NO. 000R1169.20
Dear Ms. Harmon:
On behalf of NHMOO, LLC, Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc. submits the enclosed 2014
Active Remediation Monitoring Report for the above-referenced site. The work was
conducted in accordance with Pre-approval Task Authorization Numbers 20113-22 and
20113-23 and subsequent change orders. This work included soil sampling in areas
where historical source area releases occurred to evaluate the effectiveness of the Soil
Vapor Extraction (SVE) system, groundwater monitoring to further evaluate the
effectiveness of groundwater remediation activities, groundwater modeling to evaluate
groundwater plume stability, and an updated receptor survey.
Based on the data presented in the attached report, Mid-Atlantic is requesting a No
Further Action (NFA) Status for the subject site pending final North Carolina Department
of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) review and approval. The request is
based on meeting the cleanup standards detailed in the Corrective Action Plan (CAP),
dated June 28, 2002 as summarized below:
• Results for the sampling of soils in the areas where historical releases of
petroleum occurred indicate that residual petroleum has been successfully
remediated to non-detected concentrations or to concentrations below Residential
MSCCs. Petroleum-related constituents are still present at concentrations above
applicable Soil-to-Groundwater MSCCs at two locations.
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 14, 2014
Request for No Further Action Status Page 2
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills
• Groundwater monitoring results indicate that free product is no longer present and
has not been detected in monitoring and remediation wells for at least four
consecutive quarterly (or longer) monitoring events.
• Benzene has not been detected in excess of its Gross Contaminant Level (GCL)
for at least four consecutive quarterly (or longer) monitoring events. No other
petroleum-related constituents have been detected in groundwater at the site
above their respective GCLs during previous monitoring events.
• Groundwater modeling data from BIOSCREEN suggests that the BTEX
contaminant plume will gradually migrate downgradient between 2014 and 2051.
However, modeling results indicate that the BTEX contaminant plume is unlikely to
reach the previously identified downgradient stream at concentrations above
applicable surface water quality standards.
• A half-life of two years was utilized for the groundwater monitoring simulations to
calibrate the model. This value is on the high end of the reported half-life for
benzene as reported in the literature. The actual half-life applicable to the site is
likely higher due to the significant reduction in contaminant concentrations. This
provides a level of conservatism to the modeling results to provide “worst case”
predictions.
• Historical groundwater monitoring results indicate that groundwater contaminant
concentrations continue to decrease at the site. This includes downgradeint
reductions in contaminant concentrations and reductions within the source area of
the release (i.e. within the former active SVE/AS remediation area). Notable
contaminant reductions within the source area have continued since the
remediation system was shut down in September of 2012. This provides a line of
evidence that natural attenuation of groundwater contamination continues to occur
at the site and that the plume is stable and decreasing. This information is
consistent with well gauging results that indicate the free product is no longer
present at the site.
• Combined with the groundwater modeling data, these lines of data indicate that it
is unlikely for residual petroleum in groundwater to impact the downgradient
stream in excess of applicable surface water standards over time.
• The results of an updated receptor survey indicate that six active residential water
supply wells are still located between approximately 950 and 1,500 feet northeast
of the source area of the release. These residences still use the wells as a source
of drinking water and/or for irrigation and car washing. Two wells are located
approximately 700 and 1,500 feet of the source area of the release that are
inactive but not abandoned. Groundwater monitoring conducted since 2002
demonstrate that these water supply wells are located upgradient of the source
area of the release. Combined with groundwater modeling data discussed above,
available data indicates it is unlikely that these wells will be impacted by residual
groundwater contamination.
• Based on previous and updated receptor information, the site meets Low Risk
Criteria.
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 14, 2014
Request for No Further Action Status Page 2
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills
Available information indicates that a Notice of Residual Petroleum will need to be
recorded on the deed to the property as a condition of the NFA to document that residual
petroleum is still present in soils at concentrations above Soil-to-Groundwater but below
Residential MSCCs and that groundwater contamination is still present at concentrations
above applicable GQSs.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 250-9918.
Sincerely,
MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
Jeffrey Tyburski, PG, RSM
Senior Geologist
cc: Mr. Jennings Glenn, Kane Realty

LTM/O&M Projects/1169_20/2014 Monitoring Report /JT/jnc
ANNUAL 2014
ACTIVE REMEDIATION MONITORING REPORT
EXXON 4-0010 NORTH HILLS
FACILITY ID #: 0-005126
4359 SIX FORKS ROAD
RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
INCIDENT NUMBER 20113
Source of Release: Gasoline UST System
Date Release Discovered: April 17, 1998
Latitude: 35° 50’ 21”N
Longitude: 78° 38’ 33”W
Risk Classification: High
Land Use: Residential
Prepared For:
Mr. Jennings Glenn
Kane Realty
Post Office Box 19107
Raleigh, North Carolina 27619
[phone]
Prepared By:
Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc.
409 Rogers View Court
Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
[phone]
November 24, 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1
2.0 POTENTIAL RECEPTOR INFORMATION .......................................................... 3
3.0 SOIL SAMPLING – PUMP ISLANDS .................................................................. 4
4.0 WATER TABLE AND FREE PRODUCT MEASUREMENTS ............................... 5
4.1 Water Table Measurements .......................................................................... 6
4.2 Free Product Measurements ......................................................................... 6
5.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS ........................... 7
5.1 Fuel Related Organics ................................................................................... 8
5.2 Other Organics (Non-Fuel Related) ............................................................... 8
6.0 SURFACE WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS ......................... 9
7.0 MONITORED NATURAL ATTENUATION PARAMETER MEASUREMENTS ..... 9
AND GROUNDWATER MODELING .............................................................................. 9
7.1 Monitored Natural Attenuation Measurements .............................................. 9
7.2 Groundwater Model Selection ..................................................................... 10
7.3 BIOSCREEN Input Parameters and Model Simulations .............................. 11
7.4 BIOSCREEN Model Results ........................................................................ 12
8.0 ANALYSIS OF SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION EFFLUENT ................................. 14
9.0 ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF CONTAMINANTS REMOVED ................................ 14
10.0 PERIODIC OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COSTS ................................ 14
11.0 OVERALL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE .............................................................. 14
12.0 PROPOSED SYSTEM CHANGES, CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................... 15
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
DRAWINGS
Drawing 1.1 Topographic Site Map
Drawing 1.2 Site Map
Drawing 2.1 Water Supply Well Location Map Update
Drawing 3.1 Summary of Laboratory Test Results, Soil Sampling – August 2014
Drawing 4.1 Estimated Water Table Contour Map – October 2014
Drawing 4.2 Free Product Detection Summary – March 2014
Drawing 5.1 Benzene in Groundwater – March 2014
Drawing 5.2 Toluene in Groundwater – March 2014
Drawing 5.3 Ethylbenzene in Groundwater – March 2014
Drawing 5.4 Total Xylenes in Groundwater – March 2014
Drawing 5.5 MTBE in Groundwater – March 2014
TABLES
Table 2.1 Water-Supply Well Information Update
Table 3.1 Summary of Parameters Detected in Soil – August 2014
Table 4.1 Groundwater Elevation Data (October 8, 2014)
Table 5.1 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results (March, 24, 2014)
Table 5.2 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results (July 3, 2014)
Table 5.3 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results (October 8, 2014)
Table 7.1 Summary of Monitored Natural Attenuation Parameters
APPENDICES
Appendix A Drawings – Summary of Previous Soil Sampling Results From 2002
Appendix B Laboratory Analytical Report and Chain-of-Custody Record – Soil
Samples
Appendix C Historical Gauging and Analytical Data, and
Monitoring Well Construction Data
Appendix D Laboratory Analytical Reports and Chain-of-Custody Records –
Groundwater Samples
Appendix E Input Data to BIOSCREEN Model and Modeling Results
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The subject site is the North Hills Exxon Station, Incident No. 20113 (North Hills Exxon)
located at 4359 Six Forks Road in Raleigh, North Carolina (Drawings 1.1 and 1.2) and
is located in the northeast corner of the North Hills Mall property. A gasoline/diesel and
automobile repair/service station has been operating at the site since about 1960. The
former underground storage tank (UST) owner, Payne Services (Payne), operated the
station from 1964 through 2010. The current property owner is NHMOO, LLC, which
acquired the USTs from Payne in December of 2010 and now leases the property and
the USTs to WMB of North Hills, Inc. The release of gasoline from the UST system was
discovered on April 17, 1998, and reported on April 28, 1998 (GZA, 1998), which
initiated assessment and corrective action activities.
After several investigations, Mid-Atlantic Associates, Inc. (Mid-Atlantic) prepared a
Corrective Action Plan (CAP) for the site dated June 28, 2002, in accordance with 15A
NCAC 2L .0106(k). This CAP outlined soil and groundwater remediation activities using
soil vapor extraction (SVE), air sparging (AS), and natural attenuation. The SVE/AS
system was installed at the site from November 2002 through June 2003. The SVE
system was started on June 9, 2003. On November 17, 2003, twelve of the 24 AS wells
were activated in areas where free product was removed as a result of SVE operations.
On August 2, 2004 five additional AS wells were activated. In April of 2006, the remaining
AS wells (with the exception of AS-2 located adjacent to the east side of the Exxon
station) were activated. In July of 2007, AS-2 was activated, making all of the AS wells
operational. The remediation system was turned off between April 27, 2009 and January
4, 2011 since data available at that time had indicated that the free product and benzene
Gross Contaminant Level (GCL) corrective action goals had been met. On January 4,
2011, the remediation system was turned back on after results of the previous monitoring
event indicated the presence of localized areas of free product. The system was turned
off on May 19, 2011. Groundwater sampling was conducted on July 11, 2011 to evaluate
the effectiveness of the active remediation. Results indicated the localized presence of
free product in MW-4 and MW-30. Available data indicated that there was a new release
of petroleum from the current UST system in the vicinity of the Lassiter Mill Road pump
island.
Based on available groundwater monitoring data, the source of the new release appears
to have been from one or more former gasoline dispenser pumps on the northern pump
canopy adjacent to Lassiter Mill Road. These pumps were replaced in January of 2011
under new ownership of the station. Available data, including tightness testing results for
the current UST system that was presented to NCDENR under separate cover, suggest
that the release was eliminated through replacement of the pumps. Information about this
release was described in Mid-Atlantic’s Summary Letter of Environmental Activities, dated
June 8, 2012 that was submitted to NCDENR. This new release was subsequently
addressed by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR) in two Notices of Regulatory Requirements (NORR) for Investigation and
Confirmation of Suspected Release and Risk-Based Assessment and Corrective Action
for Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks, both dated September 30, 2011. One of the
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 24, 2014
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills Page 2
Raleigh, North Carolina
notices was for a suspected release of diesel fuel from a leaking valve from dispenser
pump No. 12 adjacent to Six Forks Road.
As described in Mid-Atlantic’s Summary Letter of Environmental Activities report,
additional assessment and corrective action was taken to satisfy the requirements of the
NORRs. This included an attempt to advance hand auger borings around the pump
islands and free product recovery including the performance of a 96-hour Mobile Multi-
Phase Extraction (MMPE) event. The scope of work for the event was provided in a pre-
approval letter to Ms Harmon dated February 21, 2012. MMPE activities were initiated on
March 19, 2012.
In addition to MMPE activities, Mid-Atlantic submitted a scope of work to operate a portion
of the existing remediation system for a five-month period to conduct additional cleanup
of the recent release at the Lassiter Mill Road pump islands and to conduct ongoing
remediation for the original 1998 release. This included the operation of Zone A of the
existing AS and SVE remediation system (The remediation system was originally
designed to include three separate zones for SVE well operation and to allow individual
operation of the AS wells to provide cost-effective alternatives to operate the system).
Zone A encompasses the Lassiter Mill Road pump island which is the approximate
location of the new and previous 1998 releases.
Zone A of the SVE portion of the remediation system was restarted on April 16, 2012. Air
sparge wells AS-1 through AS-8 were restarted on April 19, 2012. The SVE system was
operated continuously for an approximate five-month period, and the AS wells were
operated for a one week period for each of the five months, ending on September 19,
2012. Monthly gauging of monitoring wells was conducted in addition to remediation
system operations and maintenance activities. A groundwater monitoring event was
conducted on November 16, 2012 to evaluate the effectiveness of cleanup activities
involving free product gauging and the collection of groundwater samples from selected
site monitoring wells. This information was presented in the Annual 2012 Active
Remediation Monitoring Report, dated February 20, 2014.
After review of the Annual 2012 Active Remediation Monitoring Report, NCDENR
indicated that available data could potentially support a NFA status for the site. Additional
data collection would be required to evaluate if a NFA status is appropriate for the site.
Data needs that were identified included soil sampling in the area where historical
releases were identified to evaluate the effectiveness of SVE activities. Data needs also
included additional groundwater monitoring to confirm the absence of free product and
benzene concentrations below its GCL over at least four consecutive quarterly events,
and an updated receptor survey focusing on the status of water supply wells within a
1,500-foot radius of the source area of the release. This also included groundwater
modeling to evaluate if the groundwater plume is stable and will not impact the previously
identified downgradient stream. These data collection needs were addressed in
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 24, 2014
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills Page 3
Raleigh, North Carolina
subsequent Preapproval Task Authorization Requests that were approved by NCDENR,
the results of which are presented in this report.

2.0 POTENTIAL RECEPTOR INFORMATION
As described in the previous section of this report, Ms. Karen Harmon, North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Incident Manager
requested an updated receptor survey. This includes an update of the status of known
and potential residential water supply wells identified from the receptor survey conducted
by Mid-Atlantic for the Exxon Station Cleanup (Exxon 4-0010 North Hills, Incident No.
20113 - Fourth Quarterly Groundwater Sampling Report dated June 16, 2004) and the
potential receptors update by Mid-Atlantic (Potential Receptors Update and Notice of
Residential Well Abandonment dated June 20, 2008).
A review of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR) surface water
classification website1 indicates that Crabtree Creek shown downgradient of the subject
site is classified as a Class C nutrient sensitive surface water (“C; NSW”) as ranked by
the Division of Water Quality, NCDENR in April 1988. This C NSW classification also
applies to tributaries flowing into the section of Crabtree Creek near the site. Therefore,
the unnamed tributary downgradient of the site and shown on Drawing 1.2 is subject to
the surface water standards applicable to Class C waters. This information is consistent
with the stream classification data previously reported for the site.
Mid-Atlantic conducted a visual reconnaissance of the above-referenced water supply
wells (Table 2.1 and Drawing 2.1) on July 31, 2014. Note that this update only included
the review of the above-referenced water supply wells and did not include additional field
reconnaissance or contacting of area residents within the specified search distance.
Results indicate that eight water supply wells are currently located within a 1,500-foot
radius of the North Hills Exxon station. This includes four residential water supply wells
(properties 1, 4, 7, and 8) that provide groundwater as a primary drinking water source
and two wells (properties 2 and 3) that are connected to city water but still use well
water for car washing, irrigation, etc. These six wells are located between 950 and
1,500 feet northeast of the site. Two inactive (but not abandoned) wells (properties 6
and 9) are located in the same general area between 700 and 1,500 feet to the
northeast.

1
http://nc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=5f5cce7640a1499b83a7b7efaf55
24a4
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 24, 2014
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills Page 4
Raleigh, North Carolina
Mid-Atlantic contacted the Wake County Groundwater Department to obtain records for
the existing wells identified at properties 6, 7 and 9 and the potential well identified at
property 5. According to the Groundwater Department, the presence of a water supply
well on Property 9 was verified by the department after demolition of the home and the
well is currently inactive. The Groundwater Department did not have records for
properties 5, 6, and 7.
At the time of the previous receptor update (June 2008), it was uncertain if a water supply
well was located on property 9 (4313 Camelot Drive). On July 31, 2014, Mid-Atlantic
observed an apparent inactive water supply well on property 9 near the northern
boundary of the parcel. The former residence located at the site has been removed and
the site is currently vacant and undeveloped.
Additionally, on property 7 (114 Reynolds Road), Mid-Atlantic observed what appeared to
be a new well cover possibly indicating that the water supply well at the site has been
recently repaired or replaced. The Wake County Groundwater Department does not have
a permit on file for the residence indicating that the well was installed before the current
record keeping system (starting in approximately the late 1980s) which has not been
improved or modified since then.
3.0 SOIL SAMPLING – PUMP ISLANDS
Soil sampling was previously conducted at the Exxon Station prior to 2003 to identify
the source areas of the release and the magnitude and extent of petroleum impacts.
Results indicated that releases of petroleum occurred from the distribution lines and
pump islands. Soil sampling results were summarized in the Second Addendum
Comprehensive Site Assessment (CSA) Report, dated June 20, 2002. Results
indicated the presence of several petroleum-related constituents in soil above their
respective Soil-to-Groundwater and Residential MSCCs. Laboratory summary tables
and drawings from the Second CSA Report are provided in Appendix A.
Soil sampling was conducted on August 24, 2014 in the pump island area to evaluate the
effectiveness of the SVE system at remediating soil contamination. As shown in Drawing
3.1, five soil borings (GP-1 through GP-5) were advanced at locations where the
previously described assessment activities identified the highest concentrations of
petroleum in soils. Note that soil boring GP-1 was advanced adjacent to pump No. 12 to
address the September 30, 2011 NORR for a release of diesel fuel from this pump. The
approximate locations of the SVE wells and associated piping for the remedation system
is also provided in Drawing 3.1.
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 24, 2014
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills Page 5
Raleigh, North Carolina
The soil borings were advance by Quantex under the supervision of Mid-Atlantic using
direct push. Because the locations of current single-walled fiberglass UST distribution
lines are unknown, an air knife was used to advance the first three to five feet of each
soil boring. As a precaution, the UST system was temporarily shut down and the
distribution lines were drained of fuel. The distribution lines were also pressurized with
nitrogen so that any damage to the distribution lines would be identified through the
pressure loss alarm for the UST system.
Each boring was advanced to a depth above the seasonally high water table to a depth of
approximately 25 feet below land surface (BLS). Soil samples were collected continuously
at each soil boring location using a macrocore sampler. Four to five soil samples were
collected from each boring at five foot intervals for laboratory analyses. Table 3.1
provides the depth intervals for the samples collected from each boring.
The soil samples (23 samples) were submitted to Prism Laboratories in Charlotte, North
Carolina. Each soil sample was initially be analyzed for Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection (MADEP) Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH) and
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH). Based on laboratory test results, two soil
samples from each soil boring (10 samples total) with the most elevated VPH and EPH
concentrations were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and semi-volatile
organic compounds (SVOCs) using EPA methods 8260 and 8270 (base neutrals only),
respectively. Table 3.1 identifies which soil samples from each boring were selected for
additional laboratory analyses and summarizes laboratory test results. The laboratory
test report is included in Appendix B. Results. Drawing 3.1 also provides a summary of
the maximum concentration of detected constituents for each soil boring.
Test results indicate that target analytes were not detected in the soil samples collected
from soil boring GP-1 and GP-3. Only non-petroleum constituents (acetone and
bromomethane) were detected in soil samples from soil boring GP-4. These constituents
are likely sampling and/or laboratory artifacts and are not associated with the petroleum
release. Evidence of petroleum impacts were identified in soil samples from borings GP-2
and GP-5, but target analytes were detected at concentrations below applicable
Residential Maximum Soil Contaminant Concentrations (MSCCs) and Soil-to-
Groundwater MSCCs.
4.0 WATER TABLE AND FREE PRODUCT MEASUREMENTS
Depth to groundwater measurements were collected for selected monitoring wells during
the three groundwater monitoring events conducted on March 24, 2014, July 3, 2014, and
October 8, 2014. The data collected from the October 8th event is presented in Table 4.1.
The data from all three events is also provided in the historical gauging tables found in
Appendix C.
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 24, 2014
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills Page 6
Raleigh, North Carolina
4.1 Water Table Measurements
The October 8, 2014 depth-to-groundwater measurements were used to evaluate shallow
groundwater elevation. Water levels were measured using an electronic oil/water level
indicator, using a marked location on the top of each well casing as a reference point.
The oil/water interface probe is also capable of detecting free product. The elevation of
the shallow water table was calculated by subtracting the depth to water from the
surveyed elevation of the reference point. Table 4.1 provides a summary of the measured
depth-to-groundwater, and calculated shallow groundwater elevations.
An estimated water table contour map was prepared using the October 8, 2014 data from
Table 4.1 as shown in Drawing 4.1. The water level measurements from monitoring wells
MW-6, MW-40, MW-44, and MW-48 were not used to generate the shallow water table
contour map since these are "deep" Type III monitoring wells. The SVE wells were only
used to obtain free product thickness measurements and were not used since the
referenced measuring point on these wells have not been surveyed to the site monitoring
wells’ elevation reference.
As shown on Drawing 4.1, shallow groundwater flow direction at the site is generally
towards the south. Groundwater elevation and flow characteristics across the site are
consistent with previous gauging events. No significant changes in groundwater flow
direction have been observed over time since the hotel building on the southern portion
of the property near the I-440 highway was constructed. Groundwater elevation
changes over time appear to be within normal seasonal ranges. This information
indicates that groundwater flow conditions are stable at the site including typical
seasonal fluctuations of the elevation of the water table.
4.2 Free Product Measurements
Gauging data for this reporting period is provided in Table 4.1 and historical gauging data
is included in Appendix A.
At the start of the previous 2010-2011 reporting period, free product was detected in
monitoring well MW-30 at 1.35 feet and SVE-76 and 0.08 feet. The increase in free
product in MW-30 was a consistent trend since July of 2009 and was associated with the
release of gasoline from the Lassiter Mill Road pump island area. The product thickness
for MW-30 decreased to 0.66 feet after approximately five months of operation of the
remediation during the previous 2010-2011 reporting period. The source of the release
appears to have been eliminated when new gasoline dispenser pumps were installed in
January of 2011.
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 24, 2014
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills Page 7
Raleigh, North Carolina
As previously described, MMPE was conducted in March of 2012 for monitoring wells
MW-4 and MW-30. Zone A of the remediation system was then operated for an
approximate 5 month period to remove free product from the new release. Subsequent
monitoring events did not detect free product in selected monitoring wells during the
following November 16, 2012 monitoring event. Additionally, gauging of monitoring wells
MW-4 and MW-30 and additional wells on July 19 and 22, 2013, March 24, July 3 and
October 8, 2014 also did not indicate the presence of free product. This gauging data was
collected over at least four or more gauging events separated by at least three months.
This information indicates the combination of MMPE and operation of the remediation
system was effective in removing remaining free product.
5.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS
This report includes the results from three separate groundwater sampling events that
were conducted on March 24, July 3 and October 8, 2014. Analytical data for the
sampling events are included in Tables 5.1 through 5.3 (one table per event).
Monitoring well locations are presented in Drawing 1.2.
Prior to collecting a groundwater sample from each well, the monitoring well was purged
by removing a minimum of three standing volumes of water or until the well exhibited
dryness. New nitrile gloves were worn by the sampler and a new polyethylene
disposable bailer was used for purging and collecting the groundwater sample at each
well. The groundwater samples were decanted into new, pre-labeled laboratory-
supplied containers, packed in ice, and transported under chain-of-custody to Prism
Laboratories. Groundwater samples from all three monitoring events were analyzed for
VOCs using EPA Method 6200B including methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), and
diisopropylether (DIPE). Groundwater samples from monitoring wells sampled during
the July 3, 2014 event were also analyzed for volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH)
and extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) using the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection (MADEP). Additionally, field parameters for dissolved oxygen,
oxygen/reduction potential, temperature pH specific conductance were collected for the
monitoring wells sampled during the October 8, 2014 sampling event. The additional
analyses were conducted to support groundwater modeling as presented later in this
report. A summary of laboratory test results compared to applicable NC DENR’s 2L
Groundwater Quality Standards (GQS) and GCLs are provided in Tables 5.1 through
5.3. Historical analytical data is provided in Appendix C. Copies of the laboratory test
reports are included in Appendix D.
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 24, 2014
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills Page 8
Raleigh, North Carolina
Isopleth maps of the dissolved phase concentrations of BTEX compounds and MTBE
were created using of the March 24, 2014 sampling data as presented in Drawings 5.1
through 5.5, respectively. This information was provided to show the lateral extent of
dissolved phase contamination at the site for each constituent. Isopleth maps were not
provided for the subsequent July and October 2014 sampling events as only a small
number of wells were sampled to collect concentration data over time to support
groundwater modeling as described in Section 7.0 of this report. A detailed discussion of
the analytical results is provided in Section 5.1 and 5.2.
5.1 Fuel Related Organics
For the three sampling events, no petroleum constituents were detected in excess of
established GCLs. Several constituents were detected in excess of their respective
GQSs. Continued reductions in the concentrations of fuel related constituents over time
were noted for key monitoring wells MW-3, MW-8, MW-10, MW-11, MW-19, MW-35,
MW-36, MW-37, and MW-40. Concentration vs time data for these wells is provided in
the graph included at the front of Appendix C. These wells are located within the source
area or immediately downgradient of where free product was previously detected.
Appendix C also provides concentration of time data for all site monitoring wells.
Monitoring well MW-30 is located within the source area of both the previous and most
recent release of gasoline. Substantial reductions in total BTEX in groundwater from
monitoring well MW-30 have been observed since free product was removed from the
well in 2012 through MMPE and operation of the remediation system. Total BTEX
concentrations were detected at a maximum concentration of 18,000 micrograms per
liter (ug/l) during the November 16, 2012 sampling event and were most recently
detected at a concentration of 2,660 ug/l during the October 8, 2014 sampling event.
Overall, concentrations of fuel related organics in site monitoring wells were generally
observed to be decreasing with no evidence of increasing concentrations trends. Since
the remediation system has not been operational since September of 2012, this
information indicates that continued reduction of fuel related organics is occurring at the
site through natural attenuation.
5.2 Other Organics (Non-Fuel Related)
Styrene, chloroform, and methyl isobutyl keytone were detected in groundwater during
the sampling events, but at concentrations below their respective GQSs. These
constituents appears to be likely sampling or laboratory artifacts.
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 24, 2014
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills Page 9
Raleigh, North Carolina
Constituents from the release of dry-cleaning solvent from the former Brothers Cleaners
have historically been detected in groundwater at the site. Test results did indicate
detectable concentrations of common dry-cleaning solvent constituents during the
monitoring events. The detection of these constituents is consistent with the results of
previous monitoring events.
6.0 SURFACE WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Surface water samples have previously been collected from the unnamed tributary of
Crabtree Creek. The stream was sampled during the March 24, 2014 event and the
water sample was analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method 6200B including methyl tert-
butyl ether (MTBE), and diisopropylether (DIPE). No target analytes were detected.
This information is consistent with previous monitoring results.
7.0 MONITORED NATURAL ATTENUATION PARAMETER MEASUREMENTS
AND GROUNDWATER MODELING
7.1 Monitored Natural Attenuation Measurements
On October 8, 2014, Mid-Atlantic personnel measured pH, dissolved oxygen (D.O.),
specific conductivity, oxygen reduction potential (ORP) and temperature in site
monitoring wells. The measurements were made using a YSI-556 meter. Field-
measured values for pH, D.O., conductivity, ORP, and temperature are summarized in
Table 7.1.
• Dissolved Oxygen (D.O.): Lower concentrations of D.O. are present in
groundwater at wells inside the contaminant plume in comparison to wells
located upgradient or cross-gradient. The D.O. in upgradient and cross-gradient
wells was approximately 4.75 mg/L, compared with D.O. measurements ranging
from 0.62 to 1.71 mg/L inside the plume. If biodegradation of contaminants is
occurring, lower levels of D.O. are expected inside the contaminant plume
compared with D.O. levels outside the contaminant plume (ASTM, 1995). The
D.O. values inside the plume that are below 1 mg/L (0.62 mg/L at MW-30 and
0.88 mg/L at MW-1) suggest a marginal aerobic to anaerobic environment for
biodegradation. However, the D.O. level of approximately 4.75 mg/L upgradient
of the plume indicates that oxygen may continue to be an electron acceptor
source for aerobic biodegradation.
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 24, 2014
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills Page 10
Raleigh, North Carolina
• ORP: Values of ORP at +50 millivolts (mV) or higher suggest oxidizing conditions
potentially conducive to aerobic biodegradation. Values <+50mV suggest
reducing conditions potentially conducive to anaerobic biodegradation. The ORP
values at plume wells ranged from -42.8 mV (MW-1) to +45 mV (MW-30). The
ORP value upgradient was +195.6 (MW-7), cross-gradient it was +193.6 mV
(MW-12) and downgradient it was +68.6 mV (MW-49). The ORP data for wells
inside the plume suggests reducing conditions; however, the ORP at upgradient
well MW-7 (+195.6) suggests water moving into the plume area is under
oxidizing conditions.
• pH and Temperature: Trends in pH and temperature between plume wells and
outside wells may indicate that biological activity is occurring. The plume wells
had pH readings generally ranging from 6.4 to 6.6 while the background and
cross-gradient wells had lower pH values of 5.5 to 5.7. If biological activity is
occurring in a plume the groundwater temperature may be higher inside the
plume vs. outside. The temperature data obtained by Mid-Atlantic indicated
slightly higher temperatures in water from upgradient and cross-gradient wells in
comparison with the plume wells (Table 7.1).
In summary, the geochemical parameter results indicate that biodegradation is
occurring within the contaminant plume at the site.
7.2 Groundwater Model Selection
The nearest receptor is an unnamed tributary of Crabtree Creek located approximately
1,650 feet to the south and hydraulically downgradient of the source area of release.
Laboratory analytical data indicates that historically benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene
and naphthalene have exceeded ten times the NCSWQS for groundwater samples
collected from site monitoring wells.

In order to evaluate BTEX contaminant fate and transport at the site, Mid-Atlantic
utilized the groundwater modeling software BIOSCREEN Version 1.4 (July 1997). This
software contains simple screening models which simulate groundwater remediation by
natural attenuation (RNA) of petroleum hydrocarbons at leaking UST sites. The
software is programmed in the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet environment and was
created by Groundwater Services, Inc. and the Air Force Center for Environmental
Excellence. It is also referenced in EPA guidance documents as an appropriate
screening tool to determine if natural attenuation may be applicable at sites impacted
with petroleum compounds and chlorinated solvents. Three different types of models
can be simulated using the BIOSCREEN software. These models include:
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 24, 2014
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills Page 11
Raleigh, North Carolina
(1) Model A - solute transport without decay
(2) Model B - solute transport with biodegradation by first-order decay
(3) Model C - solute transport modeled as an instantaneous biodegradation
reaction with multiple electron acceptors, including dissolved oxygen, nitrate
and sulfate
Simulations were conducted utilizing Model B noted above, the solute transport model
with biodegradation by first-order decay, to evaluate the potential for the on-site release
to impact the downgradient unnamed tributary of Crabtree Creek. Our review of
historical groundwater laboratory test results indicates that biodegradation of
contaminants is occurring over time. The BIOSCREEN User Manual (User Manual) does
not recommend Model A for petroleum service station sites where contaminant
concentrations are declining and evidence of RNA has been documented (EPA, 1996).
Model C was not used because laboratory analyses of groundwater samples for nitrate
and sulfate has not been completed in recent years, and dissolved oxygen has
sporadically been measured during sampling events. The results for the first-order
decay model (Model B) are discussed in Section 7.3. According to the User Manual, the
BIOSCREEN software assumes that vertical flow gradients are not significant enough to
affect contaminant transport (i.e. flow is lateral).
7.3 BIOSCREEN Input Parameters and Model Simulations
Hydrogeologic input parameters and BTEX concentrations utilized in the groundwater
modeling simulations were determined based on results from Mid-Atlantic’s prior 2003
BIOSCREEN modeling at the site and the results from groundwater sampling events
completed in July 2011, November 2012, March 2014, July 2014 and October 2014. The
2003 modelling effort was completed before contaminated soil and groundwater was
remediated within the source area between June of 2003 and September of 2012 as
detailed in the CAP and subsequent monitoring reports. For this 2014 modeling effort
using BIOSCREEN, we selected a start date of July 2011 for the modeling simulations as
this is the year that active remediation was successful in removing free product at the site
and lowering groundwater contaminant concentrations below applicable GCLs.
The site-specific dimensions for the overall model area were set at 190 feet in width by
500 feet in length for simulations between July 2011 and October 2014. The length of
the model area was chosen to be slightly longer and wider than the furthest reaching
plume for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and toluene (BTEX) constituents. The
groundwater contaminant plume for benzene was approximately 450 in length by 180
feet in width in July 2011. For simulations of plume extent for future years, the model
length was set to 1,650 feet, the distance to the downgradient receptor. The width of
the model area was not changed for the simulations run prior to October 2014 and the
simulations run for future dates. A detailed summary of input values for the modeling
simulations are provided in Appendix E.
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 24, 2014
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills Page 12
Raleigh, North Carolina
The table provided below identifies target dates and elapsed time (in years) from the
start date for the BIOSCREEN model (July 2011). Laboratory results were used for
comparison of predicted results vs. actual results for selected wells from sampling
events in July 2011, November 2012, March 2014, July 2014 and October 2014. Wells
chosen for comparison of predicted and actual concentrations are located along the
approximate centerline of the contaminant plume and its projected, potential path to the
unnamed tributary of Crabtree Creek. Among the wells used for comparison, one or
more wells were not sampled on the five sampling dates noted above. After comparing
the results from each simulation, the model was calibrated by adjusting the first order
decay coefficient (FODC) and dispersivity values input into the model (Appendix E).
After calibration, predicted future results were then generated from the modeling
simulations for 2021, 2031, 2051 and 2061.
Date and Comments Year
July 2011 – Initial Date of Model
Note: Simulation ran for year 0.1 to provide
results for comparison
0
November 2012 1.3
March 2014 2.6
July 2014 3.0
October 2014 3.3
2021 10
2031 20
2051 40
2061 50
7.4 BIOSCREEN Model Results
The results of the solute transport with biodegradation by first-order decay model (first
order decay) simulations are provided in Appendix E. The models were calibrated by
adjusting first-order decay coefficients (FODC), dispersivity values, and/or the source
area concentrations, and then comparing the predicted concentrations to the laboratory
results. Ratios were calculated to compare the predicted results vs. the actual results
using different FODC and dispersivity values (the primary and secondary calibration
parameters for the first-order decay model). A summary of the predicted vs. actual
results and corresponding ratios are included in Appendix E. A ratio of 1.0 on the table
means that the predicted and actual BTEX concentration were the same value. Given
the wide range of total BTEX concentration values, ratios near 1 were difficult to obtain.
We considered a predicted concentration within 39% of the actual concentration as a
“good” result (i.e. ratio values ranging from 0.61 to 1.39). Ratios considered “fair” fall
within 40% to 55% of the laboratory results (i.e. 0.45 to 0.6 for ratios lower than 1 and
1.4 to 1.55 for ratios greater than 1).
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 24, 2014
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills Page 13
Raleigh, North Carolina
FODC values were calculated based on half-lives presented in the User Manual.
Considerable time was spent calibrating the model with the first order decay coefficient
(FODC), as discussed in Section 4 of Appendix E. Eventually an FODC corresponding
with a half-life of 2 years was selected to calibrate the model to existing laboratory
results for monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-4. The predicted results from March 2014
(model year 2.6) fell within 30% of the actual BTEX concentration at well MW-1 and
nearly matched the concentration at MW-4. The model under-predicted the actual
concentration at MW-35. The predicted results from October 2014 were 37% less than
the actual concentration at well MW-11 (considered a “fair” fit) and under-predicted the
results at MW-35. The higher BTEX concentrations at MW-35 relative to the other wells
could not be simulated with the BIOSCREEN model. This is because predicted
concentrations generally decrease with distance from the source area. In an attempt to
model the MW-35 concentrations, we reset the “source area” for the model at a location
50 feet upgradient of well MW-35, and then ran a second set of simulations to compare
the predicted results to actual concentrations at MW-35, MW-49 and MW-41. The
second set of simulations are referred to as the “MW-35 and downgradient” model. The
FODC and dispersivity values were modified as indicated above to calibrate the model
to actual results from October 2014. The predicted results nearly matched the actual
concentration from MW-35. For both sets of simulations, please note that the actual
half-life representative of site conditions may be smaller (i.e. quicker breakdown).
Simulations for future years (2021, 2031, 2051 and 2061) were run after the model was
calibrated. In 2021, the leading edge of the BTEX plume (concentration of 0.005 mg/L)
is 825 feet downgradient from the source area. In 2031 and 2051, the leading edges of
the BTEX plume (0.001 mg/L) are at 1,320 feet and 1,485 feet from the source area,
respectively. In 2061, the leading edge of the BTEX plume (0.001 mg/L) is at the same
position as 2051.
Future simulations were also run for the “MW-35 and downgradient” model for the years
2021, 2031, 2051 and 2061. A similar half-life and FODC were used, however the
dispersivity values and retardation factor used in the model varied from the “whole site”
model discussed earlier in this section (see Appendix E for details). In 2021, the leading
edge of the BTEX plume (concentration of 0.001 mg/L) is 640 feet downgradient from
well MW-352. In 2031 the leading edge of the BTEX plume (0.002 mg/L) is 916 feet
from well MW-35. In 2051, the leading edge of the BTEX plume (0.001 mg/L) is 1,054
feet from well MW-35. In 2061, the leading edge of the BTEX plume (0.001 mg/L) is
1,104 feet from well MW-35.
2 Well MW-35 is located 50 feet from a second “source area”. This is an arbitrary point we
placed in the plume 50 feet upgradient from MW-35 and was used only for modeling purposes
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 24, 2014
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills Page 14
Raleigh, North Carolina
Note that modeling results are conservative in nature to predict “worst case” conditions
and that total BTEX concentrations continue to decrease in concentration over time to
less than 1.0 ug/l on the leading edge of the plume which are near or below the Method
Detection Limit (i.e. “non-detected” concentrations) for the laboratory test methods
utilized for groundwater analysis.

8.0 ANALYSIS OF SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION EFFLUENT
The remediation system was not operated during this reporting period and has not been
operated since September 19, 2012. Additional operation of the remediation system was
not conducted since previous groundwater monitoring results indicated that groundwater
cleanup goals presented in the CAP had likely been achieved.
9.0 ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF CONTAMINANTS REMOVED
Since the June 9, 2003 to September 19, 2012, approximately 22,987 pounds (3,760
gallons) of gasoline have been removed from the subsurface through active operation of
the SVE/AS system and the March 2012 MMPE event. These estimated do not include
additional mass removal through natural attenuation.
10.0 PERIODIC OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE COSTS
The DENR pre-approved cost for groundwater sampling, laboratory analyses,
groundwater monitoring, project management, and reporting costs, during the period of
March through November of 2014 (including the preparation of this report), is
approximately $23,065.
11.0 OVERALL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
Operation of the remediation system (in addition to the March 2012 MMPE event) was
effective in meeting CAP goals for soil and groundwater remediation and free product
removal. This includes both the original release of petroleum as documented in the CAP
and the new release of gasoline from the Lassiter Mill Road pump island area.
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 24, 2014
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills Page 15
Raleigh, North Carolina
12.0 PROPOSED SYSTEM CHANGES, CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the data presented in this report, Mid-Atlantic concludes that the criteria for a
No Further Action (NFA) Status have been satisfied. This includes the following:
• Results for the sampling of soils in the areas where historical releases of
petroleum occurred indicate that residual petroleum has been successfully
remediated to non-detected concentrations or to concentrations below Residential
MSCCs. Petroleum-related constituents are still present at concentrations above
applicable Soil-to-Groundwater MSCCs at two locations.
• Groundwater monitoring results indicate that free product is no longer present and
has not been detected in monitoring and remediation wells for at least four
consecutive quarterly (or longer) monitoring events.
• Benzene has not been detected in excess of its Gross Contaminant Level (GCL)
for at least four consecutive quarterly (or longer) monitoring events. No other
petroleum-related constituents have been detected in groundwater at the site
above their respective GCLs during previous monitoring events.
• Groundwater modeling data from BIOSCREEN suggests that the BTEX
contaminant plume will gradually migrate downgradient between 2014 and 2051.
However, modeling results indicate that the BTEX contaminant plume is unlikely to
reach the previously identified downgradient stream at concentrations above
applicable surface water quality standards.
• A half-life of two years was utilized for the groundwater monitoring simulations to
calibrate the model. This value is on the high end of the reported half-life for
benzene as reported in the literature. The actual half-life applicable to the site is
likely higher due to the significant reduction in contaminant concentrations. This
provides a level of conservatism to the modeling results to provide “worst case”
predictions.
• Historical groundwater monitoring results indicate that groundwater contaminant
concentrations continue to decrease at the site. This includes downgradeint
reductions in contaminant concentrations and reductions within the source area of
the release (i.e. within the former active SVE/AS remediation area). Notable
contaminant reductions within the source area have continued since the
remediation system was shut down in September of 2012. This provides a line of
evidence that natural attenuation of groundwater contamination continues to occur
at the site and that the plume is stable and decreasing. This information is
consistent with well gauging results that indicate the free product is no longer
present at the site.
• Combined with the groundwater modeling data, these lines of data indicate that it
is unlikely for residual petroleum in groundwater to impact the downgradient
stream in excess of applicable surface water standards over time.
Annual 2014 Active Remediation Monitoring Report November 24, 2014
Exxon 4-0010 North Hills Page 16
Raleigh, North Carolina
• The results of an updated receptor survey indicate that six active residential water
supply wells are still located between approximately 950 and 1,500 feet northeast
of the source area of the release. These residences still use the wells as a source
of drinking water and/or for irrigation and car washing. Two wells are located
approximately 700 and 1,500 feet of the source area of the release that are
inactive but not abandoned. Groundwater monitoring conducted since 2002
demonstrate that these water supply wells are located upgradient of the source
area of the release. Combined with groundwater modeling data discussed above,
available data indicates it is unlikely that these wells will be impacted by residual
groundwater contamination.
• Based on previous and updated receptor information, the site meets Low Risk
Criteria.
Based on this information, Mid-Atlantic recommends submitting this report to NCDENR
with a request for a NFA status. Available information indicates that a Notice of Residual
Petroleum will need to be recorded on the deed to the property as a condition of the NFA
to document that residual petroleum is still present in soils at concentrations above Soil-
to-Groundwater but below Residential MSCCs and that groundwater contamination is still
present at concentrations above applicable GQSs.
-7'+1


-7
-7
'+1
-7'+1
'+1-7
-7'+1
-7'+1


-7'+1
-7'+1
-7'+1