Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWI-96043_96920_CA_IAR_20230123 3502 Hayes Road • Monroe, North Carolina 28110 113 West Firetower Road, Suite G • Winterville, North Carolina 28590 Phone (704) 845-4010 • (888) 870-4133 • Fax (704) 845-4012 Initial Abatement Action Report January 2023 Ludie Brown Road Saddle Tank Spill GPS Coordinates 34.82768°N, 77.769803°W Chinquapin, Duplin County North Carolina GRI Project Number: 6340 Ethan Rogerson, GIT Project Manager January 23, 2023 Warsaw, NC 28398 1585 NC 24 and 50 Tarheel Concrete Mr. Bryan Kennedy Prepared for: Report Editor Samuel L. McKay, III, P.G. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Prepared by: Geological Resources, Inc. Initial Abatement Action Report Prepared on: January 19, 2023 Ludie Brown Road Saddle Tank Spill Project Manager: Ethan Rogerson, GIT GRI Project No. 6340 i SITE INFORMATION 1. Site Identification  Ludie Brown Road Saddle Tank Spill  Incident Number: Pending – Risk Ranking Undetermined  Location of Release: GPS Coordinates 34.82768°N, 77.769803°W Chinquapin, NC Duplin County 2. Information about Contacts Associated with the Release Responsible Party Julio Figueroa 1315 Nash Johnsons Pond Road Magnolia, NC 28453 Email No. Unknown Phone No. Unknown Property Owner NCDOT 1501 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1501 Unknown Unknown Consultant Geological Resources, Inc. (GRI) 3502 Hayes Road Monroe, NC 28110 egr@geologicalresourcesinc.com 704-845-4010 Cleanup Contractor Tarheel Concrete 1585 NC 24 and 50 Warsaw, NC 28398 tarheelconcrete@yahoo.com 910-284-6888 UVF Analytical Geological Resources, Inc. 3502 Hayes Road Monroe, NC 28110 egr@geologicalresourcesinc.com 704-845-4010 3. Information about Release  Release occurred on December 27, 2022.  Reportedly, approximately 100 gallons of diesel fuel was released from a leaking saddle tank on a tractor trailer owned by Julio Figueroa. Certification: I, Samuel L. McKay, III, a Licensed Geologist for Geological Resources, Inc., do certify that the information contained in this report is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Geological Resources, Inc. is licensed to practice geology and engineering in North Carolina. The certification numbers of the corporation are C-127 and C-2727, respectively. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Prepared by: Geological Resources, Inc. Initial Abatement Action Report Prepared on: January 19, 2023 Ludie Brown Road Saddle Tank Spill Project Manager: Ethan Rogerson, GIT GRI Project No. 6340 TABLE OF CONTENTS SITE INFORMATION ............................................................................................................................ i A. RELEASE Information AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................................1 B. SOURCE INVESTIGATION ..........................................................................................................1 C. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................2 D. LIMITATIONS ...........................................................................................................................2 FIGURES Figure 1: Site Location Map Figure 2: Site Map Figure 3: Soil Quality Map TABLE Table 1: Summary of Soil Sample Analytical Results APPENDICES Appendix A: UST-62 Form Appendix B: Soil Disposal Manifest Appendix C: Analytical Laboratory Report and Mobile Laboratory Results _____________________________________________________________________________________ Prepared by: Geological Resources, Inc. Initial Abatement Action Report Prepared on: January 19, 2023 Ludie Brown Road Saddle Tank Spill Project Manager: Ethan Rogerson, GIT GRI Project No. 6340 1 A. RELEASE INFORMATION AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS 1. Incident Information: The site of the release is located on the shoulder of Ludie Brown Road, Chinquapin, Duplin County, NC (Figure 1). Reportedly, a truck owned by Julio Figueroa had a leaking saddle tank due to a vehicle accident on December 27, 2022. Approximately 100 gallons of diesel fuel was released from the leaking saddle tank onto shoulder of the Ludie Brown Road. Initial abatement activities were conducted by Tarheel Concrete. On January 3, 2023, impacted soil was excavated until soil samples reported concentrations less than the Regulatory Action Level (RAL). On January 4, 2023, a UST-62 Form was submitted to North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). A copy of the UST-62 Form is included as Appendix A. A Site Map is included as Figure 2. 2. Historical Information: No historical information is available for the site. 3. Comprehensive Description of the Release: Reportedly, approximately 100 gallons of diesel was released from a saddle tank of a truck involved in a vehicle accident. 4. Description of the Site Characteristics: The spill occurred on the shoulder of Ludie Brown Road approximately 445 feet west of Willie Hatcher Road. The impacted soil from the spill covered an area of approximately 361 square feet to a depth 2 feet below ground surface (bgs). The surrounding area is residential and agricultural. Public water is available to the surrounding area. 5. Summary of Initial Abatement Actions, Assessment Activities, and Corrective Actions: On January 3, 2023, Tarheel Concrete initiated abatement activities by using a track mounted excavator to remove impacted soil. GRI personal supervised excavation activities based on UVF analytical results and field observations. Impacted soil was excavated until the total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) gasoline-range organics (GRO) and diesel-range organics (DRO) values were less than the regulatory action levels (RAL). 6. Contaminated Soil and Water Storage/Treatment and/or Disposal: On January 3, 2022, the excavation of 22.37 tons of impacted soil from the spill area was loaded directly into a dump truck and transported to a permitted disposal facility. A soil disposal manifest is included as Appendix B. B. SOURCE INVESTIGATION 1. Investigation Performed To-Date to Determine the Source of the Release: The release was the result of a saddle tank of a truck involved in a vehicle accident. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Prepared by: Geological Resources, Inc. Initial Abatement Action Report Prepared on: January 19, 2023 Ludie Brown Road Saddle Tank Spill Project Manager: Ethan Rogerson, GIT GRI Project No. 6340 2 2. Soil Excavation and Sampling Based upon onsite mobile laboratory results from January 3, 2022, GRI personnel supervised the excavation of 22.37 tons of soil from area of approximately 361 square feet to a depth 2 feet bgs. During excavation activities, GRI personnel collected soil samples (SS-1-2’ through SS-5-2’) that were analyzed on-site using a mobile UVF laboratory. Concentrations of TPH-DRO and TPH-GRO less than the RALs were reported in all soil samples SS-1-2’ through SS-5-2’. Soil sample locations and soil quality information for the soil samples collected on January 3, 2023, are shown on Figure 3. A summary of analytical results for the soil samples collected on January 3, 2023, are included as Table 1. A copy of the UVF analytical report for soil samples collected in January 2023 is included as Appendix C. C. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS  On December 27, 2023, reportedly, approximately 100 gallons of diesel fuel was released from the saddle tank of a truck during a vehicular accident on Ludie Brown Road in Chinquapin, NC.  The impacted soil from the spill covered an area of approximately 361 square feet to a depth 2 feet below ground surface bgs.  Based upon onsite mobile laboratory results from January 3, 2022, GRI personnel supervised the excavation of 22.37 tons of soil from area of approximately 361 square feet to a depth 2 feet bgs. During excavation activities, GRI personnel collected soil samples (SS-1-2’ through SS-5-2’) that were analyzed on-site using a mobile UVF laboratory. Concentrations of TPH-DRO and TPH-GRO less than the RALs were reported in all soil samples SS-1-2’ through SS-5-2’.  22.37 tons of impacted soil was excavated from the release area and transported to a licensed disposal facility.  On January 4, 2023, a UST-62 Form was submitted to NCDEQ.  Based on this information, impacted soil has been successfully removed and no further abatement activities are warranted. The incident should be closed with the issuance of a No Further Action. D. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Tarheel Concrete and NCDEQ for specific application to the referenced site in Duplin County, North Carolina. The assessment was conducted based on the scope of work and level of effort desired by NCDEQ and with resources adequate only for that scope of work. Our findings have been developed in accordance with generally accepted standards of environmental practices in the State of North Carolina, available information, and our professional judgment. No other warranty is expressed or implied. The data that are presented in this report are indicative of conditions that existed at the precise locations sampled and at the time the samples were collected. In addition, the data obtained from samples would be interpreted as being meaningful with respect to parameters indicated in the laboratory report. No additional information can logically be inferred from these data. FIGURES SITE LOCATION Figure 1 Site Location Ludie Brown Road Saddle Tank Spill Ludie Brown Road Chinquapin, North Carolina Duplin County Incident No. N/A GRI Project No. 6340 Date: 01/19/2023 Location: 34.82768°N -77.769803°W D a d TABLE Date: 1/4/2023 Sample ID Sample Discription Date Collected (mm/dd/yy) Sample Depth 50 100 SS-1-2'01/03/23 2'<10 <2 SS-2-2'01/03/23 2'<10 <2 SS-3-2'01/03/23 2'10.2 4.2 SS-4-2'01/03/23 2'<10 2.6 SS-5-2'01/03/23 2'10.8 6.4 DUP SS-5-2'01/03/23 ---<10 6 Excavation Area Regulatory Action Levels (mg/kg) Notes: • Results reported in mg/kg; samples analyzed onsite by UVF. • ft-BGS: feet below ground surface. TABLE 1 LUDIE BROWN ROAD SADDLE TANK SPILL (INCIDNET # PENDING) SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS Analytical Method UVF Analysis Contaminant of Concern TPH-GROTPH-DROPage 1 of 1 APPENDICES APPENDIX A UST-62 Form UST-62 24-Hour Notification of Discharge Form For Non-UST Releases of Petroleum in NC This form should be completed and submitted to the UST Section’s regional office following a known or suspected release of petroleum from a source other than an underground storage tank. This form is required to be submitted within 24 hours of discovery of a known or suspected petroleum release (DWM USE ONLY) Incident # ___________ Priority Rank (H,I,L,U) _____ Received (time/date) ___________________________ Received by ________________ Region __________ Reported by (circle one): Phone, Fax or Report Release discovered (time/date):______________ _______________________ INCIDENT DESCRIPTION Incident Name: Address (street number/name): County: Zip Code:City/Town:Regional Office (circle one): Asheville, Mooresville, Fayetteville, Raleigh, Washington, Wilmington, Winston-Salem Latitude (decimal degrees): Longitude (decimal degrees) : Obtained by: Describe suspected or confirmed release (nature of release, time/date of release, quantity of release, amount of free product): T GPS T Electronic topographic map T GIS Address matching Describe initial response/abatement (time/date release stopped, cleanup begun/completed, quantity of product soil removed, confirmation sampling): T Other T Unknown Describe impacted receptors: Describe location: HOW RELEASE WAS DISCOVERED (Release Code) (Check one) T Observation of Release at Occurrence T Visual or Olfactory Evidence T Soil Contamination T Groundwater Contamination T Water Supply Well Contamination T Surface Water Contamination T Other (specify) _______________ NCONTAMINATIOSOURCE OF Source of Release (Check one to indicate primary source) Cause of Release (Check one to indicate primary cause) Type of Release (Check one) Product Type Released (Check one to indicate primary petroleum product type released) T AST (tank) T AST Piping/ Dispenser T AST Delivery Problem T OTR Vehicle Tank T OTR Bulk Transport Tank T RR Bulk Transport Tank T Transformer T Unknown T Other ______________ Definitions presented on reverse T Spill (Accidental) T Spill (Intentional) T Corrosion T Physical or Mechanical Damage T Equipment Failure T AST Overfill T AST Installation Problem T Unknown T Other ______________ Definitions presented on reverse T Petroleum T Both Petroleum & Non-Petroleum Location (Check one) T Facility T Residence T Highway/Road T Railway T Other T Gasoline/ Diesel/ Kerosene T E11 – E20 T E21 – E84 T E85 – E99 T Ethanol 100% T Diesel/Veg. Oil Blend T Vegetable Oil 100% T Heating Oil T Waste Oil T Mineral Oil-no PCBs T Mineral Oil-PCBs T Other Petroleum Products ________ Ownership 1. Municipal 2. Military 3. Unknown 4. Private 5. Federal 6. County 7. State Operation Type 1. Public Service 2. Agricultural 3. Residential 4. Education/Relig. 5. Industrial 6. Commercial 7. Mining Guidance presented on reverse UST Form 62 (04/10) Page 1 of 2 Suspected Contamination? (Y/N) ___ Confirmed GW Contamination? (Y/N) ___ Confirmed Soil Contamination ?(Y/N) ___ Samples taken?(Y/N) ___ Free product? (Y/N) ___ If Yes(free product), state greatest thickness: _____feet IMPACT ON DRINKING WATER SUPPLIES Water Supply Wells Affected? 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown Number of Water Supply Wells Affected ______ List of Water Supply Wells Contaminated: (Include Users Names, Addresses and Phone Numbers. Attach additional sheet if necessary) 1. 2. 3. PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR RELEASE (if the source of the release is not an AST system or if it is an AST system and there is a responsible party other than the AST system owner/ operator) Name of Person/Company Address City State Zip Code Telephone Number AST SYSTEM OWNER (if the source of the release is an AST system) AST Owner/Company Address City State Zip Code Telephone Number AST SYSTEM OPERATOR (if the source of the release is an AST system) UST Operator/Company Address City State Zip Code Telephone Number LANDOWNER AT LOCATION OF INCIDENT Landowner Address City State Zip Code Telephone Number Draw Sketch of Area or Provide Map (showing incident site, location of release, two major road intersections, potential receptors) Attach sketch or map to form. Give Directions to Incident Site Attach directions to form if necessary. Person Reporting Incident Company Telephone Number Title Address Date UST Form 62 (04/10) Page 2 of 2 Definitions of Sources AST (Tank): means the tank is used to store product AST Piping: means the piping and connectors running from the tank to the dispenser or other end-use equipment AST Dispenser: includes the dispenser and the equipment used to connect the dispenser to the piping AST Delivery Problem: identifies releases that occurred during product delivery to the tank. OTR Vehicle Tank: means the tank is used to store product to fuel an over the road vehicle OTR Bulk Transport Tank: means a tank that is used to transport product in bulk over the road (by truck) RR :bulk Transport Tank: means a tank that is used to transport product in bulk by train Transformer: means electrical transformer Other: serves as the option to use when the release source is known but does not fit into one of the preceding categories Unknown: identifies releases for which the source has not been determined Definitions of Causes Spill (Accidental): use this cause when a spill occurs accidentally(e.g., when the delivery hose is disconnected from a fill pipe) Spill (Intentional): use this cause when a spill occurs intentionally (e.g., intentional dumping or breakage) Corrosion: use when a metal tank, piping, or other component has a release due to corrosion Physical or Mechanical Damage: use for all types of physical or mechanical damage, except corrosion Equipment failure: use when a release occurs due to equipment failure other than corrosion or physical or mechanical damage AST Overfill: use when an overfill occurs (e.g., overfills may occur from the fill pipe at the tank or when the nozzle fails to shut off at the dispenser) AST Installation Problem: use when the problem is determined to have occurred specifically because the AST system was not installed properly Other: use this option when the cause is known but does not fit into one of the preceding categories Unknown: use when the cause has not been determined Guidance: Ownership and Operator Type Ownership select the category which describes owner of the AST system, bulk transport tank, or other release source Operator Type select the category which describes the operation in which owner uses the AST system, bulk transport tank, or other release source Excavation Area Soil Sample Legend Ludie Brown Rd. Spill 1/3/2023Date 1/3 APPENDIX B Soil Disposal Manifest APPENDIX C UVF Analytical Results 3502 Hayes Road • Monroe, North Carolina 28110 113 West Firetower Road, Suite G • Winterville, North Carolina 28590 Phone (704) 845-4010 • (888) 870-4133 • Fax (704) 845-4012 Engineering Certification: C-2727 • Geology Certification: C-127 UVF Trilogy Analytical Report Samples Collected: January 3, 2023 Samples Analyzed: January 3, 2023 Site Name: Ludie Brown Road Saddle Tank SPill Site Address: Ludie Brown Road, Chinquapin, NC GRI Project Number: 6340 January 3, 2023 Ethan Rogerson, GIT Operator Technical Procedures Calibration The UFV Trilogy has standard calibrations stored for the following analysis:  GRO  DRO  Total PAH  Target PAH  Heavy PAH Prior to use, calibration standards are used to perform a 5-point verification on the factory stored calibrations for GRO and DRO. The calibration standards used are as follows: GRO  0.5 ppm  1 ppm  3 ppm  5 ppm  10 ppm DRO  0.1 ppm  0.5 ppm  1 ppm  3 ppm  5 ppm Operation Sample Extraction  5mg of soil are weighed into a clean extraction jar  Methanol is added to the extraction jar to create a 2x or 4x dilution o 2x Dilution: 10 mL of methanol o 4x Dilution: 20 mL of methanol  The extraction jar is shaken for several minutes to thoroughly mix the soil with solvent (methanol)  The mixture is allowed to settle for several minutes  A clean syringe is used to draw liquid from the extraction jar  A clean filter is attached to the end of the syringe and the liquid dispensed through the filter into a clean test tube  This liquid is referred to as the extraction Dilution Preparation  An adjustable micropipette is used to precisely measure out the amount of extract needed for the dilution  The measured out amount of the extract is added to a clean test tube and methanol is added dilute the extract. Examples of dilutions are shown below: Extract Amount 500 μL 200 μL 100 μL 50 μL 25 μL Add Solvent to the 5 mL line 5 mL line 5 mL line 5 mL line 5 mL line 2x Extract Dilution Factor 20x 50x 100x 200x 400x 4x Extract Dilution Factor 40x 100x 200x 400x 800x Technical Procedures Sample Analyzation  The dilution is shaken to thoroughly mix, then poured into a clean glass cuvette  The desired module is inserted into the UVF Trilogy and the corresponding factory calibration is selected  “Measure Fluorescence” is pressed on the touchscreen and the reading is recorded  The reading should be between the concentrations of the calibration standards (GRO: 0.5-10 ppm; DRO 0.1-5 ppm) o Reading below the calibration standard range are recorded as below the detection limit  Detection Limit = (lower range of calibration standards range) x dilution factor (i.e. a GRO sample with a 100x dilution factor has a detection limit of 50 ppm) o Readings above the calibration standard range should be further diluted and reanalyzed o Negative readings are an indication of quenching (see below)  The reading is multiplied by the dilution factor to calculate the final concentration  Check suspected contaminated samples for quenching by running additional dilutions o According to the siteLAB Quick Reference Guide: “Quenching” can occur when the detector is swamped by too many hydrocarbons or organic interferences, producing low or negative concentrations. Test the sample at multiple dilutions to confirm results are linear and accurate.” QA/QC Method Blank  A method blank of methanol will be analyzed following calibration and following the last sample analyzed each day Duplicates  One duplicate will be analyzed for every 20 samples  The duplicate will be prepared from the extract of the sample and diluted to the same factor as the sample analyzed Project Name:Date Collected: Project Number:Date Analysed: Project Manager:Operator: Sample ID Matrix Dilution Factor x GRO Output (ppm) =GRO Value (mg/Kg) Dilution Factor x DRO Output (ppm) =DRO Value (mg/Kg) SS-1-2'Soil 20 <0.5 <10 20 <0.1 <2 SS-2-2'Soil 20 <0.5 <10 20 <0.1 <2 SS-3-2'Soil 20 0.51 10.2 20 0.21 4.2 SS-4-2'Soil 20 <0.5 <10 20 0.13 2.6 SS-5-2'Soil 20 0.54 10.8 20 0.32 6.4 DUP SS-5-2'Soil 20 <0.5 <10 20 0.3 6 Soil <0 <0 Soil <0 <0 Soil <0 <0 Soil <0 <0 Soil <0 <0 Soil <0 <0 Soil <0 <0 Soil <0 <0 Soil <0 <0 Soil <0 <0 Soil <0 <0 Soil <0 <0 Soil <0 <0 UVF Analytical Report siteLAB UVF Trilogy 1/3/2023 1/3/2023 Ethan Rogerson Ludie Brown Road Saddle Tank Spill 6340 Ethan Rogerson Site: Ludie Brown Road Saddle Tank Spill Report Date: 1/4/2023 Page: 1 of 1