HomeMy WebLinkAbout20026_ Kaiser Fluids _EMP Signed 20221026_503 Sugar Creek Parcel
CONTENTS
Completed EMP Template Form
Figures
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site and Sample Location Map
Figure 3 Proposed Building Layout and Sample Location Map
Appendices
Appendix A Preliminary Site Plan
Appendix B Previous Environmental Assessment Data Tables
Appendix C Preliminary Site Grading Plan
Appendix D Preliminary Cut/Fill Analysis
Appendix E Construction Schedule
1
EMP Version 2, January 2021
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.
The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory‐compliant
decision‐making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development‐related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project,
and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be
cause for a reopener.
The EMP is valid only for the scope of work described herein and must be updated to be
applicable for new phases of redevelopment or after significant changes in applicable
regulatory guidance.
Voluntary Metrics Tab
The NC Brownfields Program updates estimated capital investment (from the Brownfields
Property Application) and estimated jobs created (from the Brownfields Agreement) whenever
possible. As a voluntary measure, you may opt to complete the below information for capital
investment and jobs created as estimated by your final redevelopment plans for the Brownfields
Property:
1. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: Click or tap here to enter
text.
2. Estimated jobs created:
a. Construction Jobs: Click or tap here to enter text.
b. Full Time Post-Redevelopment Jobs: Click or tap here to enter text.
2
EMP Version 2, January 2021
Table of Contents
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................... 1
GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................ 4
COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 4
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ............................................................................... 5
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS ........................................................................................................................ 6
CONTAMINATED MEDIA ......................................................................................................................... 7
PART 1. Soil ......................................................................................................................................... 8
PART 2. GROUNDWATER ................................................................................................................. 20
PART 3. SURFACE WATER .................................................................................................................. 22
PART 4. SEDIMENT ............................................................................................................................ 22
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR ......................................................................................................................... 22
PART 6. SUB‐SLAB SOIL VAPOR ........................................................................................................ 23
PART 7. INDOOR AIR ......................................................................................................................... 24
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM ............................................................................................. 25
CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials ..................... 26
POST‐REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING ..................................................................................................... 28
APPROVAL SIGNATURES ....................................................................................................................... 29
3
EMP Version 2, January 2021
So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.
☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.
☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:
☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.
☒ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.
☒ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.
☐ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
on site after construction grading.
☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).
☒ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.
☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
☐ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.
☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.
☒ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.
4
EMP Version 2, January 2021
☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.
☐ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.
☒ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Date: 9/13/2022 Revision Date (if applicable): 10/26/2022
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Kaiser Fluids Tech II
Brownfields Project Number: 20026‐16‐060
Brownfields Property Address: 530 East Sugar Creek Road and 4100 Raleigh Street, Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Brownfields Property Area (acres): The Brownfields Property is comprised of two contiguous parcels
of land (Parcel Identification Numbers 09107104 and 09107204) that total approximately 8.2 acres.
The Brownfields Property parcels are bisected by Raleigh Street. The northern parcel (530 E. Sugar
Creek Road; former Kaiser Fluids) consists of vacant land with the exception of a former building slab
and parking lot. The southern parcel (4100 Raleigh Street; former Henkel Chemical) is being
redeveloped for various commercial purposes including retail, restaurants, art galleries, music venues,
breweries, and/or co‐working spaces. The southern parcel is being redeveloped in accordance with a
DEQ‐approved EMP (Revision‐1) dated May 3, 2019. This EMP includes planned redevelopment
activities proposed on the northern parcel (530 E. Sugar Creek Road). A Site location map is provided
as Figure 2.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
COMMUNICATIONS
A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE‐SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.
5
EMP Version 2, January 2021
Prospective Developer (PD): Trailhead 530 Owner, LLC
Contact Person: Hank Farmer
Phone Numbers: Office: Click or tap here to enter text. Mobile: (404) 312‐4743
Email: hankf@thirdandurban.com
Contractor for PD: NRP Construction
Contact Person: Jon Finney
Phone Numbers: Office: (844) 677‐0002 Mobile: (843) 259‐5613
Email: jfinney@nrpgroup.com
Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC
Contact Person: Matt Ingalls
Phone Numbers: Office: (704) 887‐4617 Mobile: (704) 560‐5767
Email: mingalls@harthickman.com
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Carolyn Minnich
Phone Numbers: Office: (704) 661‐0330 Mobile: (704) 661‐0330
Email: carolyn.minnich@ncdenr.gov
Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
Chris Clark – NC DEQ IHSB – phone : 336‐776‐9679 ; email : chris.clark@ncdenr.gov
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:
On‐site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior ☒
Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior ☒
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours ☒
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours ☒
Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior ☒
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days ☒
6
EMP Version 2, January 2021
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☒Residential ☒Recreational ☐Institutional ☒Commercial ☒Office ☒Retail ☐Industrial
☒Other specify:
The 530 E. Sugar Creek Road parcel will be improved with a mixed‐use transit‐oriented
development to include commercial, office, retail, restaurants, and/or multi‐family residential
uses.
2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth‐moving activities
at the site:
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
☐ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
☐ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
The PD plans to redevelop the 530 E. Sugar Creek Road parcel with two five‐story mixed‐use
commercial and residential apartment buildings, a parking deck, access roadways, and asphalt‐
paved surface parking. Future plans may include construction of a multi‐story office building in
the southwestern portion of the parcel. Prior to redevelopment, the existing on‐site building
slab and asphalt‐paved parking areas will be removed, and mass grading will be conducted at the
Site. A preliminary Site Plan is included as Appendix A.
4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.
5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.
6) Which category of risk‐based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
7
EMP Version 2, January 2021
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
☒ Residential ☐ Non‐Residential or Industrial/Commercial
7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 2/22/2023
b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
Redevelopment activities completed under the current phase of construction (activities
outlined above) are expected to take up to two to three years to complete. Initial Site work
is anticipated to begin in February 2023 followed Site grading, foundation work, and utilities.
Initial Phase construction is anticipated to begin in August 2023 and end in October 2024. A
second Phase of building construction is anticipated to begin October 2024 and end in
February 2025. Note that these construction milestones are subject to change.
c) Additional phases planned? ☒ Yes ☐ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known: October 2024
Start Date: 10/1/2024
Planned Activity:
An additional phase of construction is anticipated for the southwestern portion of the 530 E.
Sugar Creek Road parcel and includes proposed construction of an office building. However,
construction plans have not been developed at this time.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 10/29/2024
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Please fill out the sections below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas
of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure overlaying new
construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil:……………………………………….……………. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown
Part 2. Groundwater:.……………………….……..……. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown
Part 3. Surface Water:.……………...……..…………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown
8
EMP Version 2, January 2021
Part 4. Sediment:.……………...……..…………………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown
Part 5. Soil Vapor:…..…………...……..…………………. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown
Part 6. Sub‐Slab Soil Vapor:……...……..…………….. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown
Part 7. Indoor Air:...……..…………………………………. ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☒ Unknown
2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.
PART 1. Soil
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
H&H conducted Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) activities at the 530 E. Sugar Creek
Road parcel in November 2011 and conducted Brownfields assessment activities at the parcel in
October 2018. Tabular summaries of the soil analytical data are provided in Appendix B. Soil
sample locations are shown on Figure 3 and a brief summary of the results is provided below.
TPH‐DRO
The results of soil sample analyses indicate that detected concentrations of TPH‐DRO exceed the
North Carolina Action Level of 100 mg/kg in SB‐8 (0 to 2 ft), SB‐9 (6 to 8 ft), SB‐10 (0 to 2 ft), and
SB‐13 (3 to 4 ft). These samples were collected in the vicinity of the former numerical control
lathes, the former RCRA room, the loading dock and former hazardous waste storage area, and
the former O&R room floor drain. Sample were not collected for analysis of TPH‐DRO during the
October 2018 Brownfields assessment.
VOCs
Trichloroethylene (TCE) was detected above the Residential PSRG of 0.87 mg/kg in SB‐4 (0‐2 ft)
and above the Industrial/Commercial PSRG of 4.0 mg/kg in SB‐10 (6‐8 ft) during the November
2011 Phase II ESA. These samples were collected in the vicinity of the former TCE degreaser and
the former loading dock and hazardous waste storage area. No VOCs were detected above the
Residential or Industrial/Commercial PSRGs during the October 2018 Brownfields assessment.
SVOCs
SVOCs were not detected during the October 2018 Brownfields assessment at concentrations
above PSRGs. SVOCs were not analyzed during the November 2011 Phase II ESA.
Metals
The results of the metals analyses indicate that concentrations of arsenic were detected above
laboratory reporting limits during the October 2018 Brownfields assessment in each soil sample
collected at concentrations ranging from 1.5 J mg/kg to 8.5 mg/kg and in the November 2011
Phase II ESA at concentrations between <0.58 to 4.7 mg/kg. The arsenic concentrations are
generally within the range of Site‐specific background concentrations (3.1 mg/kg to 3.7 mg/kg)
collected in October 2018. Arsenic was detected in two samples at concentrations above the
Site‐specific background range and the Industrial/ Commercial PSRG of 3 mg/kg, including: HHSB‐
1 (8.5 mg/kg) and HHSB‐7 (5.7 mg/kg).
9
EMP Version 2, January 2021
Analytical results indicate that concentrations of hexavalent chromium were detected in 10 of
the 12 soil samples and each of the four background soil samples at concentrations ranging from
0.18 J mg/kg to 0.44 J mg/kg. Multiple soil samples contained hexavalent chromium detections at
concentrations above the Residential PSRG of 0.31 mg/kg but below the Industrial/Commercial
PSRG of 6.5 mg/kg during both the 2011 and 2018 assessments. The hexavalent chromium
detections were generally consistent in concentration and were collected from depths ranging
from 0 to 8 ft bgs from across the Site. No other metals were detected in the soil samples
collected at concentrations above background and PSRGs.
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Sample depths are noted above and include depth ranges between 0 and 8 ft bgs.
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
Approximately 196,020 square feet (4.5 acres; the entire 530 E. Sugar Creek Rd parcel) will be
disturbed during Site redevelopment.
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
To achieve the desired grade at the Site, soils will generally be imported to raise the existing
grade by up to 5 feet. Because this is a net‐import site, significant excavation is not planned.
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
This is a net soil import site based on current grading plans and cut/fill analysis. Limited
excavation activities could occur during initial scraping of surficial asphalt/gravel grading
activities. If possible, these materials will be utilized on‐Site.
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
As noted above, limited excavation activities could occur during initial scraping of surficial
asphalt/gravel grading activities. The scraping materials do not appear to be impacted based on
previous assessment activities.
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
Excavation of impacted soil is not anticipated. Any soil excavated at the Site is proposed to be
re‐used in fill areas during redevelopment.
Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).
1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31‐261.35?....................................... ☐Yes ☒No
10
EMP Version 2, January 2021
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained‐Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained‐In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes ☐ No
b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED‐OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED‐IN POLICY THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes ☒ No
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
☐ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ If no, explain rationale:
Soil analytical data does not indicate detections capable of exceeding TCLP
criteria using the Rule of 20 and does not contain a Listed Waste as defined in
the North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31‐261.35.
d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
☒ Preliminary Health‐Based Residential SRGs
☐ Preliminary Health‐Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
☒ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
☐ Site‐specific risk‐based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
11
EMP Version 2, January 2021
Click or tap here to enter text.
Additional comments:
Click or tap here to enter text.
3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known
☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☒
☒ Describe cap or fill:
Should potentially impacted soil or fill materials be encountered during redevelopment that
do not require removal for geotechnical or construction purposes, the potentially impacted
soil or fill materials may be placed beneath impervious surfaces (asphalt pavement,
sidewalks, access roads, buildings, etc.) or a minimum of 2 ft of clean fill. PD plans to import
soil onto the 530 E. Sugar Creek Road property from the southern portion of the
Brownfields property (4100 Raleigh Street) excluding the areas previously identified with
PCB‐impacts.
☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re‐recorded if
actions are Post‐Recordation).
☒ GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
☐ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:
4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
☒ Yes, describe the method will include:
Significant areas of contaminated soil are not expected to be encountered or disturbed
during Site redevelopment activities based upon soil sampling data and preliminary grading
plan. The grading contractor will consider conditions such as wind speed, wind direction,
and moisture content of soil during soil grading and stockpiling activities to minimize dust
generation. In the unlikely event that contaminated soil is encountered during site
redevelopment that requires excavation, particular attention will be paid by contractors to
implement dust control measures as needed based on site and atmospheric conditions (i.e.,
Click or tap here to enter text.
12
EMP Version 2, January 2021
by controlled water application, hydro‐seeding, and/or mulch, stone, or plastic cover).
Potentially impacted soil will be managed as described below.
☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Field Screening of site soil
☒ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
During soil disturbance at the Site, the workers or contractors will observe soils for
evidence of potential significantly impacted soil. Evidence of potential significantly
impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously
disposed materials of concerns (i.e., chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be
noted during sitework, the contractor will contact the environmental professional to
observe the suspect condition. If the environmental professional confirms that the
material may be impacted, then the procedures below will be implemented. In addition,
the environmental professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within
two business days to advise that person of the condition.
☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Soil Sample Collection
☐ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in‐situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ No, explain rationale:
Collection of additional soil samples is not anticipated based on results of previous Site
assessment activities and the fact that this is a soil import‐site, and the beneficial fill will
be tested prior to placement at the Site (if not obtained from a commercial quarry as
discussed further in Part 1.B. below). If soil impact is encountered during grading and/or
installation or removal of utilities, excavation will proceed only as far as needed to allow
grading and/or construction of the utility to continue and/or only as far as needed to
allow alternate corrective measures described below. Suspect impacted soil excavated
during redevelopment activities may be stockpiled and covered in a secure area to allow
construction to progress. Suspect impacted soil will be stockpiled in accordance with
Figure 2, NCBP Diagram for Temporary Containment of Impacted or Potentially Impacted
Soil. At least one representative soil sample (no less than 3 aliquot soil samples for non‐
VOC analysis) at a sample ratio of 1 soil sample per every approximately 1,000 cubic yards
of soil will be collected for analysis of total VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA metals, and hexavalent
chromium. If the soil sample laboratory analytical results indicate that the soil could
potentially exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria, then the soil will also
be analyzed by TCLP for those compounds that could exceed the toxicity characteristic
13
EMP Version 2, January 2021
hazardous waste criteria. Impacted soil will be handled in the manner described below
based upon the laboratory analyses:
i. If no organic compounds are detected in a sample (other than which are attributable
to sampling or laboratory artifacts) and metals are below the Protection of Groundwater
or Residential PSRG (whichever is lower for the detected compounds) and are consistent
with Site‐specific background levels with acceptable cumulative risk calculator results,
then the soil will be deemed suitable for use as on‐Site fill without conditions or as off‐
Site fill with DEQ approval. The proposed location(s) for off‐Site placement of soil (other
than a subtitle D landfill or permitted landfarm facility) along with the receiving facility’
written approval for acceptance of the soil will be provided to DEQ for approval prior to
taking the soil off‐Site.
ii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed Residential PSRGs
(other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts) and the TCLP
concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil may be used on‐Site as
fill without conditions.
iii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the Residential PSRGs
(other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are
consistent with background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations are below
hazardous waste criteria, then the soil, with DEQ’s written approval, may be used on‐Site
as fill below an impervious surface, at least 2 ft of compacted demonstrably clean soil, or
overlain by a geotechnical fabric. If the impacted soil with concentrations above
Residential PSRGs is moved to an on‐Site location, its location and depth will be
documented and provided to DEQ and the impacted soil will be placed beneath at least 2
ft of compacted demonstrably clean soil, an impervious surface, or covered by a
geotechnical fabric.
iv. Impacted soil may be transported to a permitted facility (i.e., MSWLF or DEQ
permitted land farm) provided that the soil is accepted at the disposal facility. If soil is
transported to a permitted facility, the permitted facility’s written approval to dispose of
soil from the Site will be included with the final EMP report. In the unlikely event that the
sample data indicates concentrations above TCLP hazardous waste criteria, then the soil
must be transported off‐Site to a permitted disposal facility that can accept or treat
hazardous waste.
v. If soil export is necessary, the procedure(s) in Part 1.c. Export Soils will be followed.
If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Methods 6020/7471
14
EMP Version 2, January 2021
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7196 (assuming appropriate method
detection limits can be met by the laboratory) or 7199
☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:
☒ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Methods 6020/7471
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Analyze for PCBs if soil is imported from the adjacent former Henkel property.
☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7196 (assuming appropriate method
detection limits can be met by the laboratory) or 7199
Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0‐2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1‐2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, indicate if a work
plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
Following completion of soil disturbance for future Site development (i.e., after grading
and utility construction), an environmental professional will observe the Site for areas that
Click or tap here to enter text.
15
EMP Version 2, January 2021
will not be covered upon completion of the redevelopment with a minimum of 2 ft of
demonstrably clean fill soil, building foundations, sidewalks, asphalt or concrete parking
areas, driveways, or other impervious areas (e.g., tightly spaced pavers or bricks). If such
areas exist, a Work Plan will be prepared for final grade sampling for DEQ Brownfields
review and approval. It is anticipated that one final grade soil sample will be collected for
laboratory analysis for each approximately 100 ft of linear landscape area or every
approximately 1,000 sq ft of open area.
Final grade soil samples will consist of a maximum of five (5) aliquot soil samples collected
from within each evaluation area which will be combined and homogenized to form one
composite soil sample for laboratory analysis of SVOCs and RCRA metals plus hexavalent
chromium. In addition, one grab soil sample will be collected from each evaluation area
and submitted for laboratory analysis of VOCs.
If no such areas exist, documentation will be provided to the DEQ Brownfields project
manager and/or the DEQ Brownfields Property Management Unit.
☐ If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Part 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL
NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner.”
Requirements for importing fill:
1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
Based on preliminary grading plans and cut/fill analysis, up to approximately 20,500 cubic yards of
fill will need to be imported to the 530 E. Sugar Creek Road portion of the Site although the PD is
currently working on reducing the amount of import required to achieve the desired grades.
Additionally, the PD plans to import limited amounts of organic rich topsoil from a commercial
landscape material vendor for use in proposed landscaped areas.
3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range
of depths, please list the range.)
0 to 9 feet
16
EMP Version 2, January 2021
4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
The source(s) of the fill material has not been determined at this time. The PD may utilize existing
soil data for the Site (including the 4100 Raleigh Street portion of the Brownfields Site) and other
local Brownfields Properties to determine a suitable import source. Once a suitable source has
been identified, the PD will provide the information and proposed import source to the DEQ
Brownfields Program for approval.
Alternatively, the PD may import fill material from the Vulcan Materials Company quarry located
near Pineville, NC or from the Martin Marietta quarry located on Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte,
NC. In addition, and as noted previously, a portion of the imported fill material may be sourced
from the southern Brownfields parcel (4100 Raleigh Street). If soil is imported from the southern
Brownfields parcel, the soil will be cut from areas outside of the “Areas of Known PCB
Contamination” on the property.
5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use at the Brownfields property.
To demonstrate that imported soil from an off‐site source is suitable for use at residential
property, the fill soil will be sampled and approved by DEQ Brownfields prior to being brought to
the Site. A sampling plan will be developed and submitted for DEQ Brownfields review under
separate cover and will generally consist of one sample per 1,000 cubic yards consisting of a
minimum 3 composite sample for non‐VOC analysis and a grab sample for VOC analysis based on
field screening results (e.g., odor, PID readings, staining, etc.). DEQ approval of the sampling
plan and analytical results is required prior to bringing soil on Site from an off‐site source. Soil
will be considered suitable for use at the Site if it does not contain compound concentrations
above Residential PSRGs or Site‐specific background levels for metals.
6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Methods 6020/7471
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):.
☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e., Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
17
EMP Version 2, January 2021
Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7196 (assuming appropriate method
detection limits can be met by the laboratory) or 7199
7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in‐situ
borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought
onto the Brownfields Property.
The PD will follow the procedures outlined below to demonstrate import soil from an off‐site
source meets acceptable standards applicable to the Site:
‐ If the PD plans to import virgin fill material (i.e., not reused, or recycled material) from Vulcan
Materials Company quarry located near Pineville, NC or from the Martin Marietta quarry located
on Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, NC, no samples of the import material will be collected as
adequate analytical data is available in the DEQ Brownfields database to demonstrate material
from these facilities is suitable for use as structural fill at a Brownfields property.
‐If fill soil is obtained from a developed (or previously developed) off‐Site property that is not a
known permitted quarry, soil samples will be collected for laboratory analyses indicated above at
a general rate of approximately one sample per 500 cubic yards. The sample will consist of a
minimum 3‐point composite sample for non‐VOC analysis and a grab sample for VOC analysis.
‐If the proposed borrow source has not been previously developed (i.e., virgin land), soil samples
will be collected for laboratory analyses indicated above at a general rate of one sample per 1,000
cubic yards. The sample will consist of a minimum 3‐point composite sample for non‐VOC analysis
and a grab sample for VOC analysis.
Fill soil will be considered suitable for use at the Site if it does not contain compound
concentrations above DEQ Residential PSRGs, metals concentrations are generally consistent with
Site‐specific background levels, or the results of risk calculations using the latest version of the
DEQ Risk Calculator indicate that VOC, SVOC, and metals concentrations detected in fill soil are
suitable under a residential use exposure scenario. DEQ approval of the analytical results will be
obtained prior to transporting import soil to the Site.
The PD also plans to import limited amounts of virgin topsoil from a commercial landscape
material vendor for use in proposed landscaped areas. The PD does not plan to collect samples of
landscaping materials prior to placement at the Site.
Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL
NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
18
EMP Version 2, January 2021
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.
1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.
Soil export is not anticipated at this time. Excavated soil is planned for use as fill material at the
Site. However, if soil export is deemed necessary, in‐situ or stockpile sampling may be
performed. The results of the export soil assessment will be presented to DEQ Brownfields
under separate cover if assessment activities are conducted.
In general, it is anticipated that export soil sampling will include laboratory analysis of VOCs by
EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, RCRA metals by EPA Method 6020/7471, and
hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199. It is anticipated that the composite samples will be
collected at a rate of approximately 1 sample per 1,000 cubic yards. Sample volume for SVOCs
and metals analysis will be collected from up to 5 sample aliquot locations to form one (1)
composite sample. Each aliquot will be field screened for the presence of VOCs using a
calibrated photoionization detector (PID). VOC samples will be collected as grab from the aliquot
which exhibits the highest indication of impact during field screening.
Following completion of the soil sampling activities and receipt of the analytical data, H&H will
prepare a data summary package for DEQ review. The data summary package will include a
tabular summary of the laboratory analytical results in comparison to the regulatory screening
levels and background metals concentrations, and a copy of the laboratory analytical report.
H&H assumes that the data summary package can be reviewed by DEQ to provide guidance
regarding potential export site selection. Based on analytical results of soil samples collected
from the export soil, the soil will be transported off‐Site to a suitable location. The PD will notify
DEQ Brownfields of the location receiving the export soil. If not a permitted facility (e.g., another
Brownfields property), written approval from DEQ Brownfields and the receiving facility will be
obtained prior to transporting the soil off‐Site. If the receiving facility is a non‐Brownfields
property, DEQ Solid Waste Section approval will be obtained prior to transporting the soil off‐
Site.
2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
☒ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
☒ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting Landfill;
☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility
☒ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property – determination that a
19
EMP Version 2, January 2021
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and that a record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
☒ Use as Beneficial Fill off‐site at a non‐Brownfields Property ‐ Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.
3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).
The environmental professional will contact DEQ Brownfields to obtain DEQ Brownfields and
DEQ Solid Waste approval prior to exporting soil to a non‐permitted facility (i.e., landfill). If soils
are transferred to another Brownfields Property, DEQ Brownfields approval will be obtained
prior to transport.
Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)
☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original
depth from which it was excavated.
☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials or provide the results of this evaluation in the
Vapor Mitigation Plan. Note that if vapor mitigation is planned for site buildings, utility
corridors will need to be evaluated as part of mitigation designs:
Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ If no, include rationale here:
As indicated in Section 7, the PD intends to install a vapor mitigation system for the proposed
redevelopment.
☐ Unknown, details to be provided in the Vapor Mitigation Plan for site buildings
Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
The environmental professional will remain on call on an as‐needed‐basis during redevelopment
activities at the Site. In the event suspected contaminated soil and/or vapors are encountered in
20
EMP Version 2, January 2021
utility trenches during redevelopment activities (based on observed soil staining or discoloration,
unusual and/or strong odors, or physical effects such as dizziness, lightheadedness, coughing,
difficulty breathing, etc.), the trench will be evacuated, and the environmental professional will be
called to perform appropriate safety screening of the soil/vapors. Safety screening activities include
screening the soil using a PID and monitoring the worker breathing zone with a multi‐gas monitor (or
similar instrument[s] capable of detecting VOCs and combustible gases) for VOCs, methane, oxygen,
carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide photoionization detector.
If the environmental professional confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures
outlined in Part 1.A. Managing On‐Site Soil above will be implemented, and appropriate engineering
controls (such as the use of industrial fans) will be implemented. In addition, the environmental
professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within 48‐hours to advise that person
of the condition.
PART 2. GROUNDWATER
1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
Based on previous environmental assessment at the Site, depth to groundwater ranges from
approximately 17 ft to 22 ft below ground surface.
2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☒onsite ☐offsite ☐both or ☐unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
Groundwater impacts are likely to be the result of previous Site operations. Previous
groundwater assessment activities at the 530 E. Sugar Creek Road parcel have indicated the
presence of groundwater impacts above 2L Standards are present in the vicinity of the former
settling tank (HHTMW‐2), former loading dock (HHTMW‐4), and former numerical lathes (TMW‐
2). Tabular summaries of the groundwater analytical data are provided in Appendix B and
groundwater sample locations are shown on Figure 3.
VOCs
1,4‐dioxane was detected at a concentration of 300 µg/L (2L Standard: 3 µg/L) and vinyl chloride
was detected at an estimated concentration of 0.61 J µg/L (2L Standard: 0.03 µg/L) in HHTMW‐4.
Additionally, TCE was detected at an estimated concentration of 1.4 J µg/L in groundwater
sample HHTMW‐4, which slightly exceeds the Residential GWSL of 1 µg/L but is below the 2L
Standard of 3 µg/L. Of the compounds detected above 2L Standards, only the TCE detection
from the former loading dock was above the Residential GWSL.
Metals
Chromium (total) was detected at concentrations of 21 µg/L (TMW‐2) and 20 µg/L (HHTMW‐2),
which are above the 2L Standard of 10 µg/L.
3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
During previous groundwater assessment, the hydraulic gradient at the Site was generally
21
EMP Version 2, January 2021
determined to be to the northwest towards Little Sugar Creek.
4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
☐Yes ☒No
If yes, describe these activities:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered
during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent
management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or
sampling procedures).
Although it is not anticipated that groundwater will be encountered during redevelopment,
appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken if groundwater gathers in an open
excavation within an area determined to be impacted (based on strong odor, unnatural color,
sheen, etc.) during construction activities. The contractor will contact the environmental
professional to observe the area(s) suspected to be impacted. The accumulated water will be
allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent time for dissipation does not disrupt the
construction schedule. Should the time needed for natural dissipation of accumulated water be
deemed inadequate, the water will be tested for the presence of VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA
metals and disposed off‐Site (if impacted) or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not
impacted above DEQ surface water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and
State regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control.
5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☒Yes ☐No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes ☒No
6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
☒ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program’s intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
☒ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
☐ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
☒ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.
7) Please provide additional details as needed:
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
Existing monitoring wells on the Site will be abandoned as part of the current phase of
redevelopment.
22
EMP Version 2, January 2021
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.
PART 3. SURFACE WATER
1) Is surface water present at the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes ☐ No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run‐off, stormwater impacts):
Not Applicable
PART 4. SEDIMENT
1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No
4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.
5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
Not Applicable
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
Groundwater:.….☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
Groundwater:…..☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown Note ‐ Mercury was initially detected above non‐
residential vapor intrusion groundwater screening levels in a MW‐3 groundwater sample collected
23
EMP Version 2, January 2021
in October 2018. Mercury was not detected above laboratory detection in a groundwater sample
collected from MW‐3 or its duplicate collected in February 2019.
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?
4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during
redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list
activities for management of such contact:
The environmental professional will remain on call on an as‐needed‐basis during redevelopment
activities at the Site. If contaminated soil vapors are suspected during redevelopment activities
(based on unusual or strong odors, dizziness, lightheadedness, coughing, difficulty breathing,
etc.), the excavation area will immediately be evacuated, and the environmental professional will
be called to perform appropriate safety screening of the vapors. Safety screening activities
include monitoring the worker breathing zone with a calibrated multi‐gas monitor (or similar
instrument[s] capable of detecting VOCs and combustible gases) for VOCs, methane, oxygen,
carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide photoionization detector. If results indicate further action
is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be
implemented. In addition, the environmental professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields
project manager within 48 hours regarding the condition.
PART 6. SUB‐SLAB SOIL VAPOR
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in sub‐slab soil vapor:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
Groundwater:.….☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
Contaminated soil vapor has been identified at depths ranging from approximately 10 ft to 15 ft bgs at
the 530 E. Sugar Creek Road parcel. Tabular summaries of the soil vapor analytical data are provided
in Appendix B and soil vapor sample locations are shown on Figure 3.
Results of previous exterior soil gas assessment activities conducted on the Site parcel identified
benzene, 1,3‐butadiene, ethylbenzene, ethylene dibromide (also known as 1,2‐dibromoethane), TCE,
and xylenes (total) in one or more samples at concentrations that exceed the DEQ Residential and/or
Non‐Residential Sub‐Slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs). Further, the exterior and
sub‐slab soil gas to indoor air risk calculator results for select samples indicate that cumulative
carcinogenic and non‐carcinogenic health risks exceed the DEQ acceptable levels for a residential land
use scenario. As indicated in Section 7, the PD intends to install a vapor mitigation system for the
proposed mixed‐use redevelopment.
24
EMP Version 2, January 2021
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
2) Groundwater:…..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown If data indicate that sub‐slab soil vapor
concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub‐slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☒0‐6 inches ☐Other, please
describe:
Contaminated sub‐slab soil vapor has been identified associated with the existing building slab at
the 530 E. Sugar Creek Road parcel. Tabular summaries of the sub‐slab soil vapor analytical data
are provided in Appendix B and sub‐slab soil vapor sample locations are shown on Figure 3.
Results of previous sub‐slab soil vapor assessment activities conducted on the Site parcel
identified ethylene dibromide (also known as 1,2‐dibromoethane) and TCE in one or more
samples at concentrations that exceed the DEQ Residential and/or Non‐Residential SGSLs.
Further, the exterior and sub‐slab soil gas to indoor air risk calculator results for select samples
indicate that cumulative carcinogenic and non‐carcinogenic health risks exceed the DEQ
acceptable levels for a residential land use scenario. As indicated in Section 7, the PD intends to
install a vapor mitigation system for the proposed mixed‐use redevelopment.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub‐slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
☐ If no, include rationale here:
Click or tap here to enter text.
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
The environmental professional will remain on call on an as‐needed‐basis during redevelopment
activities at the Site. If contaminated soil vapors are suspected during redevelopment activities
(based on unusual or strong odors, dizziness, lightheadedness, coughing, difficulty breathing,
etc.), the excavation area will immediately be evacuated, and the environmental professional will
be called to perform appropriate safety screening of the vapors. Safety screening activities
include monitoring the worker breathing zone with a calibrated multi‐gas monitor (or similar
instrument[s] capable of detecting VOCs and combustible gases) for VOCs, methane, oxygen,
carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide photoionization detector. If results indicate further action
is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be
implemented. In addition, the environmental professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields
project manager within 48 hours regarding the condition.
PART 7. INDOOR AIR
1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
25
EMP Version 2, January 2021
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk‐based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☐ If no, include rationale here:
No buildings are currently located on the 530 E. Sugar Creek Road parcel.
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
Note – a VIMS is proposed for installation on the 530 E. Sugar Creek Road portion of the
Brownfields property but not on the 4100 Raleigh Street portion of the Brownfields property. Also,
the decision on a VIMS for a potential office pad proposed in the southwestern portion of the Site
will be determined in the future.
☐ If no or unknown, include rationale here as well as plans for pre‐occupancy sampling, as
necessary:
Click or tap here to enter text.
If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☒ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
The PD plans to install vapor intrusion mitigation systems during construction of the proposed
mixed‐use buildings.
VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer
If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Note that approval of this EMP does not imply approval with any vapor intrusion mitigation land
use restrictions or requirements of the recorded or draft Brownfields Agreement and that
separate approval of mitigation measures will be required.
In the unlikely event there is evidence of potential indoor air issues (i.e., unusual odors are identified,
or workers report lightheadedness or other unusual physical reaction) during future redevelopment
activities, the area will be evacuated, and appropriate safety screening of the indoor air will be
performed. If warranted, safety screening procedures will include periodically screening indoor air for
volatile organic vapors with a calibrated PID. If results indicate further action is warranted,
appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.
26
EMP Version 2, January 2021
CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials
In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.
Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site‐specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.
Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
EPA Methods 6020/7471
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7196 (assuming appropriate method detection
limits can be met by the laboratory) or 7199
Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
During construction activities, contractors may encounter unknown subsurface environmental
conditions (i.e., tanks, drums, or waste materials) that if encountered, will require proper
management. Prior to beginning Site work, the project environmental professional will attend a
pre‐construction kick‐off meeting with the PD and the redevelopment contractors to discuss the
DEQ‐approved EMP and various scenarios when it would be appropriate and necessary to notify the
project environmental professional of the discovery of unknown subsurface features or potentially
impacted media at the Site.
In the event that such conditions are encountered during Site development activities, the
27
EMP Version 2, January 2021
environmental actions noted below will be used to direct actions to be taken during these activities
and sampling data for potentially impacted soil and the disposition of impacted soil will be provided
to DEQ when the data becomes available.
Underground Storage Tanks:
In the event a previously unidentified UST (orphan UST) or impacts suspected to be associated with
a previously removed UST are discovered at the Site during redevelopment activities, the orphan
UST removal and/or previously removed UST‐related impacts will be addressed through the DEQ
Brownfields Program.
If the orphan UST contains residual fluids, the fluids will be removed, sampled for VOCs, SVOCs, and
RCRA metals, and transported off‐Site for disposal at a suitable facility based on the laboratory
analytical results. Impacted soil will be managed in accordance with Part 1.A. above and UST
removal will be addressed in coordination with the DEQ Brownfields Program.
Sub‐Grade Feature/Pit:
If a sub‐grade feature or pit is encountered during redevelopment, it will be removed in
coordination with the DEQ Brownfields Program. If the pit has waste in it, the waste will be set
aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste disposal purposes for TCLP VOCs, SVOCs, and
metals and disposed off‐Site at a permitted facility or the waste will be managed in accordance with
Part 1.A. above, whichever is most applicable based on the type of waste present. If the observed
waste characteristics indicate the concrete in the pit may potentially be contaminated to a
significant degree, the concrete will be sampled and analyzed by methods specified by the disposal
facility.
Buried Waste Material – Note that if buried waste, non‐native fill, or any obviously filled materials
is encountered, the DEQ Brownfields Program must be notified to determine if investigation of
landfill gases is required:
If excavation into buried wastes or significantly impacted soils occurs, the contractor is instructed to
stop work in that location and notify the environmental consultant. The environmental consultant
will observe the suspect materials and collect samples if warranted. In this event, confirmation
sampling will be conducted at representative locations in the base and the sidewalls of the
excavation after the waste or significantly impacted soil is removed. The confirmation samples will
be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals (or other analyses as appropriate based on the type
of waste material). Information will be provided to DEQ Brownfields regarding the permitted
facility used for disposal of the waste or significantly impacted soil. Areas of suspected
contaminated soil that remain at the Site after excavation is complete above the DEQ Residential
PSRGs will be managed pursuant to this plan.
Re‐Use of Impacted Soils On‐Site:
Please refer to the description outlined in Part 1.A. above.
If unknown, impacted soil is identified on‐site, management on‐site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
28
EMP Version 2, January 2021
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on‐site.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
Click or tap here to enter text.
POST‐REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
☒ Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one‐year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 1/31/2024
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment‐related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).
☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement.
29
EMP Version 2, January 2021
APPROVAL SIGNATURES
Brownfields Project Number: 20026‐16‐060
Brownfields Project Name: Kaiser Fluids Tech II
Prospective Developer: Trailhead 530 Owner, LLC Date October __, 2022
Printed Name/Title/Company: Hank Farmer
Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC Date October __, 2022
Printed Name/Title/Company: Matt Ingalls / Sr. Project
Manager / Hart & Hickman, PC
Brownfields Project Manager: Carolyn Minnich Date October __, 2022
27
27
10/27/2022
30
EMP Version 2, January 2021
Figures
UP
CHECK TYPE
CHECK TYPE
CHECK TYPE
CHECK TYPE
SUGAR CREEK LYNX
STATION & PARKING
(4020 RALEIGH STREET)
DEBRIS PILE
MW-11
SB-3
ASPHALT/GRAV
E
L
PARKING LOT
MW-10
MW-5
RW-2
RW-1
RW-4
RW-3
MW-1
MW-2
MW-8
MW-3
MW-7
MW-4
MW-6
SB-6/TMW-2
SB-2
SB-4
SB-5
SB-7
SB-8
SB-12
SB-13
SB-11
SB-10
COMPRESSORS,
RECEIVERS AN
D
TRANSFORME
R
FORMER
DEBURRING
AREA
FORMER
SETTLING
TANK
FORMER
TCE DEGREAS
E
R
OLD
BOILER
ROOM
FORMER
DESIGN/
ENGINEERING
FORMER
OFFICE/
ADMIN
FORMER
OFFICE/
ADMIN
FORMER RCRA
ROOM
FORMER
R & O
ROOM
FORMER
ENG.
LAB
FORMER
ASSEMBLY
FORMER HYDRA
U
L
I
C
PUMPS AND
COMPRESSORS
R
O
O
M
FORMER HAZA
R
D
O
U
S
WASTE STORAG
E
A
R
E
A
LOADING
DOCK
FO
R
M
E
R
GR
I
N
D
I
N
G
FORMER
TOOLING/MILLIN
G
FORMER
NUMERICAL
CONTROL LAT
H
E
S
FORMER
PAINT BOOTH
CONCRETE
PATCHED
PITS
RW-1A
PAINT BOOTH
SUMP
SB-9/TMW-3
MW-9
SB-1/TMW-1
HHTMW-1
HHTMW-2
HHTMW-3
HHTMW-4
HHSB-1
HHSG-1
HHSB-2 HHSG-2
HHSB-29
HHSB-3
HHSB-4
HHSB-5
HHSG-3
HHSG-4
HHSG-5
HHSG-6
HHSB-6
HHSB-9
HHSB-7 HHSB-8
HHSS-1
HHSS-2
HHSS-3
HHSS-4
HHSB-10
HHSB-11
CONCRETE SLA
B
KEITH CLINIC ESTRAMONTE
CHIROPRACTIC
(402 E. SUGAR CREEK ROAD)
CONCRETE SUPPLY CO.
(3940 GREENSBORO STREET)
MULTI-TENANT WAREHOUSE /
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING
(4001 RALEIGH STREET)
FORMER HENKEL CHEMICAL CORP.
PORTION OF BROWNFIELDS SITE
(4100 RALEIGH STREET)
VACANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING -
FORMER TRYON MALL CLEANING
CENTER DRY CLEANER
(451 E. SUGAR CREEK ROAD)
VACANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING -
FORMER AUTOMOTIVE GARAGE
(501 E. SUGAR CREEK ROAD)
PARKING LOT
(441 E. SUGAR CREEK ROAD)
RALEIGH STR
E
E
T
E
.
S
U
G
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
R
O
A
D
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. T&U-004
DATE: 5/17/22
FIGURE NO. 3
FORMER KAISER FLUIDS
530 E. SUGAR CREEK ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE PLAN AND SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PARCEL BOUNDARY
DUMPSTER
POLE-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER
ABANDONED GROUNDWATER MONITORING
WELL
SOIL BORING (SEPTEMBER 2011)
SOIL BORING AND TEMPORARY
MONITORING WELL (SEPTEMBER 2011)
SOIL BORING (OCTOBER 2018)
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL
(OCTOBER 2018)
SOIL GAS SAMPLE (OCTOBER 2018)
SUB-SLAB VAPOR SAMPLE (OCTOBER 2018)
FLOOR DRAIN
TRENCH DRAIN
FORMER SETTLING TANK EXCAVATION
STORM DRAIN
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
NOTES:
1.AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS (2021).
S:
\
A
A
A
-
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
T
h
i
r
d
&
U
r
b
a
n
\
T
&
U
-
0
0
4
5
3
0
E
S
u
g
a
r
C
r
e
e
k
R
o
a
d
(
F
o
r
m
e
r
K
a
i
s
e
r
F
l
u
i
d
s
T
e
c
h
S
i
t
e
)
\
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
T
U
-
0
0
4
_
S
i
t
e
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
.
d
w
g
,
F
I
G
3
,
5
/
1
8
/
2
0
2
2
1
1
:
4
3
:
4
7
A
M
,
a
k
a
i
r
y
Appendix A
Preliminary Site Plan
PROPOSED
4-STORYRESIDENTIALBUILDINGFF=731.75
PROPOSED4-STORYRESIDENTIALBUILDING
FF=731.75
PROPOSE
D
5-STORY
PARKING
D
E
C
K
FF=731.75
FUTUREOFFICEBUILDING
COURTYARD
COURTYARD
RALEIGH STREET
E
A
S
T
S
U
G
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
R
O
A
D
PROPOSED
4-STORYRESIDENTIALBUILDINGFF=731.75
PROPOSED4-STORYRESIDENTIALBUILDING
FF=731.75
PROPOSE
D
5-STORY
PARKING
D
E
C
K
FF=731.75
FUTUREOFFICEBUILDING
COURTYARD
COURTYARD
RALEIGH STREET
E
A
S
T
S
U
G
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
R
O
A
D
RALEIGH STREET
E
A
S
T
S
U
G
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
R
O
A
D
PROJECT # :
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
SHEET TITLE:
SHEET NUMBER:
This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and shallremain the property of the Architects and shall notbe reproduced, published or used in any way withoutthe permission of the Architect.
C1.2
ENLARGED SITEPLAN
J-29753.0000
JKS
JIS
53
0
S
U
G
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
TH
I
R
D
&
U
R
B
A
N
53
0
E
.
S
U
G
A
R
C
R
E
E
K
R
D
.
CH
A
R
L
O
T
T
E
,
N
C
3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W.Suite 600
Atlanta, GA 30305
T 404 365 7600
www.nilesbolton.com
No. Description Date
NC#F-08711020 Euclid AvenueCharlotte, NC 28203
www.thomasandhutton.com
11-5-2021
No. Description Date
SCHEMATIC DESIGN 11/05/21
Appendix B
Previous Environmental Assessment Data Tables
Table 1
Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Results
Kaiser Fluids Tech II
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. AMK-011
Ac
e
t
o
n
e
1,
3
-
B
u
t
a
d
i
e
n
e
Be
n
z
e
n
e
Br
o
m
o
m
e
t
h
a
n
e
2-
B
u
t
a
n
o
n
e
(
M
E
K
)
Ca
r
b
o
n
D
i
s
u
l
f
i
d
e
Ch
l
o
r
o
f
o
r
m
Ch
l
o
r
o
m
e
t
h
a
n
e
Cy
c
l
o
h
e
x
a
n
e
Dic
h
l
o
r
o
d
i
f
l
u
o
r
o
m
e
t
h
a
n
e
(F
r
e
o
n
1
2
)
1,
1
-
D
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
1,
2
-
D
i
b
r
o
m
o
e
t
h
a
n
e
ci
s
-
1
,
2
-
D
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
1,
3
-
D
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
Et
h
a
n
o
l
Et
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
Et
h
y
l
A
c
e
t
a
t
e
4-
E
t
h
y
l
t
o
l
u
e
n
e
1,
1
,
2
-
T
r
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
-
1
,
2
,
2
-
tr
i
f
l
u
o
r
o
e
t
h
a
n
e
(
F
r
e
o
n
1
1
3
)
HHSG-1 10/4/2018 <5.2 <2.0 192 <1.7 <2.5 60.1 <2.0 <0.64 75.4 <1.6 <1.3 <2.8 <0.91 188 <8.3 380 17 102 <2.6
HHSG-2 10/4/2018 40.1 38.5 18 <0.85 <1.2 7.5 <0.98 <0.31 3.4 J <0.84 <0.67 <1.4 <0.48 98 11 96 20 14 <1.3
HHSG-3 10/4/2018 52.3 <2.0 114 <1.7 9.1 J 82.5 <2.0 <0.64 15 <1.6 36 <2.8 <0.91 194 19 J 208 15 47 6,280
HHSG-4 10/4/2018 80.3 <3.1 31 <2.6 21 23 <2.9 9.7 J 43 <2.5 <2.0 152 <1.4 127 <12 734 17 J <4.4 <4.0
HHSG-5 10/4/2018 Former Settling Tank Excavation Area 42 6.4 33.9 <0.34 9.1 21 <0.39 2.1 4.8 2.2 J <0.27 <0.55 <0.19 134 12 77.7 12 26 21
25.2 <0.40 3.5 <0.34 5.6 1.5 J <0.39 1.4 J 70.2 3.2 J <0.27 <0.55 10 22 9.8 33 15 21 <0.52
22 <0.40 1.5 J <0.34 4.1 <0.29 <0.39 1.2 J 25 2.9 J <0.27 <0.55 3.6 11 8.7 13 10 8.4 <0.52
HHSG-7 10/4/2018 Former R&D Lab 23 <1.0 6.4 <0.85 3.5 J 7.2 <0.98 <0.31 3.4 J 110 <0.67 <1.4 <0.48 119 8.9 J 285 15 22 <1.3
HHSG-8 10/4/2018 West-Central Portion of Site 24.5 <0.40 47 2.6 J 10 20 <0.39 <0.13 3.8 22 <0.27 <0.55 <0.19 12 13 145 14 66.9 <0.52
HHSG-9 10/4/2018 Former Storage Building 17 <0.82 70.9 <0.70 <1.0 23 3.9 J <0.25 7.9 25 <0.52 <1.1 <0.37 13 <3.2 199 8.6 87 <1.1
HHSG-10 2/18/2019 <33 <1.4 110 <2.7 <4.6 45 <1.8 <1.4 53 <2.1 <1.6 <3.0 <1.6 23 58 J 170 <2.7 100 <4.6
HHSG-11 2/18/2019 <16 <0.70 49 <1.3 45 J 84 <0.91 <0.70 <1.2 <1.1 <0.80 <1.5 <0.81 27 74 64 26 <1.5 <2.3
220,000 14 120 35 35,000 4,900 41 630 42,000 700 1,400 1.6 NE NE NE 370 490 NE 35,000
2,700,000 180 1,600 440 440,000 61,000 530 7,900 530,000 8,800 18,000 20 NE NE NE 4,900 6,100 NE 440,000
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Enviornmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste
Management (DWM) Residential Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels
(SGSLs) (February 2018)
2) DEQ DWM Non-Residential SGSLs (February 2018)
Bold indicates concentration exceeds DWM Residential SGSL
Underlined indicates concentrations exceeds DWM Non-Residential SGSL
Only compounds detected in at least one sample shown
µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; NS = Not Established; NA = Not Analyzed
J = estimated value between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory
reporting limit
HHSG-6 /
Duplicate
Non-Residential Screening Level (2)
Residential Screening Level (1)
Sa
m
p
l
e
I
D
Sa
m
p
l
i
n
g
D
a
t
e
Ar
e
a
o
f
C
o
n
c
e
r
n
10/4/2018
An
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l
M
e
t
h
o
d
µg/m3Po
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
S
i
t
e
Former Kaiser
Technologies
Northern Portion of Site
Former Compressor, Receivers, and
Transformers Area TO-15
Former Henkel
Chemical
New Building Addition
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables
9/9/2019
Table 1 (Page 1 of 2)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1
Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Results
Kaiser Fluids Tech II
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. AMK-011
HHSG-1 10/4/2018
HHSG-2 10/4/2018
HHSG-3 10/4/2018
HHSG-4 10/4/2018
HHSG-5 10/4/2018 Former Settling Tank Excavation Area
HHSG-7 10/4/2018 Former R&D Lab
HHSG-8 10/4/2018 West-Central Portion of Site
HHSG-9 10/4/2018 Former Storage Building
HHSG-10 2/18/2019
HHSG-11 2/18/2019
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Enviornmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste
Management (DWM) Residential Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels
(SGSLs) (February 2018)
2) DEQ DWM Non-Residential SGSLs (February 2018)
Bold indicates concentration exceeds DWM Residential SGSL
Underlined indicates concentrations exceeds DWM Non-Residential SGSL
Only compounds detected in at least one sample shown
µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; NS = Not Established; NA = Not Analyzed
J = estimated value between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory
reporting limit
HHSG-6 /
Duplicate
Non-Residential Screening Level (2)
Residential Screening Level (1)
Sa
m
p
l
e
I
D
Sa
m
p
l
i
n
g
D
a
t
e
Ar
e
a
o
f
C
o
n
c
e
r
n
10/4/2018
An
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l
M
e
t
h
o
d
Po
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
S
i
t
e
Former Kaiser
Technologies
Northern Portion of Site
Former Compressor, Receivers, and
Transformers Area TO-15
Former Henkel
Chemical
New Building Addition
He
p
t
a
n
e
He
x
a
n
e
Is
o
p
r
o
p
a
n
o
l
Me
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
C
h
l
o
r
i
d
e
Pr
o
p
y
l
e
n
e
1,
1
,
1
-
T
r
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
a
n
e
1,
2
,
4
-
T
r
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
1,
2
,
4
-
T
r
i
m
e
t
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
1,
3
,
5
-
T
r
i
m
e
t
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
2,
2
,
4
-
T
r
i
m
e
t
h
y
l
p
e
n
t
a
n
e
Te
r
t
i
a
r
y
B
u
t
y
l
A
l
c
o
h
o
l
Te
t
r
a
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
To
l
u
e
n
e
Tr
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
Tr
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
f
l
uo
r
o
m
e
t
ha
n
e
(F
r
e
o
n
1
1
)
m,
p
-
X
y
l
e
n
e
o-
X
y
l
e
n
e
Xy
l
e
n
e
s
(
T
o
t
a
l
)
758 500 <3.2 <1.0 785 <3.6 <13 191 60 3,300 <0.85 40 2,660 8.1 <3.1 1,330 345 1,680
46.7 35.2 <1.6 <0.52 519 <1.8 <6.6 28 10 182 <0.42 <2.1 261 <1.0 <1.6 337 102 439
194 205 <3.2 <1.0 2,280 116 <13 85.0 27 481 <0.85 56 1,480 24 <3.1 721 194 916
105 119 14 J <1.5 1,750 <5.5 <20 <4.9 <4.9 118 <1.3 9.5 107 <3.1 <4.8 2,890 925 3,810
59.8 35 9.3 <0.20 110 <0.71 6.4 62.4 19 174 3.0 1.9 437 <0.41 <0.62 282 85.6 368
109 36.3 5.7 3.8 29.5 <0.71 <2.6 89.5 43 <0.41 1.2 J 6.1 39.6 8.6 <0.62 131 54.7 185
41.8 14 2.9 3.8 10 <0.71 <2.6 37 18 <0.41 <0.17 3.4 17 3.4 <0.62 53.9 22 75.6
37 35 <1.6 <0.52 <0.27 <1.8 <6.6 42 19 275 <0.42 17 65.9 <1.0 607 1,230 296 1,520
57.8 21 54.1 <0.20 8.1 <0.71 <2.6 156 42 178 2.9 423 577 1.1 81.5 552 169 721
85.2 43 <1.3 <0.42 16 <1.5 <5.3 204 57.5 294 <0.33 125 1,020 <0.81 93.8 756 225 977
150 380 <3.0 <4.2 200 <2.0 <5.1 390 90 NA NA <3.8 1,000 <2.2 <3.3 720 230 950
74 150 8.1 J <2.1 340 <1.0 <2.6 190 45 NA NA <1.9 400 <1.1 <1.6 260 79 339
2,800 4,900 1,400 4,200 21,000 35,000 14 420 420 NE NE 280 35,000 14 NE 700 700 700
35,000 61,000 18,000 53,000 260,000 440,000 180 5,300 5,300 NE NE 3,500 440,000 180 NE 8,800 8,800 8,800
µg/m3
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables
9/9/2019
Table 1 (Page 2 of 2)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2
Summary of Sub-Slab Vapor Analytical Results
Kaiser Fluids Tech II
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. AMK-011
Ac
e
t
o
n
e
1,
3
-
B
u
t
a
d
i
e
n
e
Be
n
z
e
n
e
Br
o
m
o
f
o
r
m
Br
o
m
o
m
e
t
h
a
n
e
Br
o
m
o
e
t
h
a
n
e
2-
B
u
t
a
n
o
n
e
(
M
E
K
)
Ca
r
b
o
n
D
i
s
u
l
f
i
d
e
Ch
l
o
r
o
f
o
r
m
Ch
l
o
r
o
m
e
t
h
a
n
e
Cy
c
l
o
h
e
x
a
n
e
1,
2
-
D
i
b
r
o
m
o
e
t
h
a
n
e
1,
1
-
D
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
a
n
e
1,
1
-
D
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
1,
2
-
D
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
1,
4
-
D
i
o
x
a
n
e
Di
c
h
l
o
r
o
d
i
f
l
u
o
r
o
m
e
t
h
a
n
e
(F
r
e
o
n
1
2
)
ci
s
-
1
,
2
-
D
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
Et
h
a
n
o
l
Et
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
Et
h
y
l
A
c
e
t
a
t
e
4-
E
t
h
y
l
t
o
l
u
e
n
e
He
p
t
a
n
e
SSVP-1 1/4/2018 114 <1.8 <2.6 <8.3 <3.1 <3.5 2.3 J <2.5 <3.9 <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.2 2.7 J 21 2.0 J <3.2 78.2 <3.5 <2.9 <3.9 <3.3
1/4/2018 72.7 <1.8 <2.6 <8.3 <3.1 <3.5 4.1 2.6 <3.9 <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.2 <4.8 6.5 2.2 J <3.2 35.8 <3.5 <2.9 <3.9 <3.3
2/13/2019 22 <0.28 <0.26 <0.93 <0.53 NA 3.8 J <0.43 <0.36 <0.28 <0.49 <0.60 <0.25 <0.32 <0.58 <4.6 2.6 <0.32 23 <0.50 <0.54 <0.60 <0.48
SSVP-3 1/4/2018 Offices 1,070 <2.7 <3.8 <12 <4.7 <5.2 4.1 4.0 <5.9 <2.5 <4.1 <9.2 <4.9 <4.8 <7.2 19 <5.9 <4.8 415 <5.2 <4.3 <5.9 <4.9
SSVP-4 1/4/2018 Warehouse #1 Storage Room 494 <1.8 <2.6 <8.3 <3.1 <3.5 38.6 3.4 <3.9 <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.2 <4.8 7.9 2.6 J <3.2 80.5 <3.5 <2.9 <3.9 <3.3
SSVP-5 1/4/2018 Former Boiler Room 36.3 <1.8 <2.6 <8.3 <3.1 <3.5 2.9 3.4 <3.9 <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.2 <4.8 <2.9 2.4 J <3.2 143 <3.5 <2.9 <3.9 <3.3
SSVP-6 1/4/2018 17 <1.8 <2.6 <8.3 <3.1 <3.5 1.4 J <2.5 <3.9 <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.2 <4.8 <2.9 <4.0 <3.2 21.1 <3.5 <2.9 <3.9 <3.3
SSVP-7 /8.6 <1.8 <2.6 <8.3 <3.1 <3.5 <2.4 2.0 J <3.9 <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.2 <4.8 <2.9 2.2 J <3.2 8.9 <3.5 <2.9 <3.9 <3.3
Duplicate 16 <1.8 <2.6 <8.3 <3.1 <3.5 2.5 2.0 J <3.9 <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.2 <4.8 <2.9 2.3 J <3.2 11 <3.5 4.7 <3.9 <3.3
1/4/2018 112 <1.8 <2.6 <8.3 <3.1 <3.5 1.4 J 4.7 <3.9 <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.2 <4.8 1.5 J 2.4 J <3.2 152 <3.5 <2.9 <3.9 <3.3
2/13/2019 22 <0.28 <0.26 <0.93 <0.53 NA 4.0 J <0.43 <0.36 <0.28 <0.49 <0.60 <0.25 <0.32 <0.58 <4.6 2.2 <0.32 29 <0.50 <0.54 <0.60 <0.48
HHSS-1 10/4/2018 Former TCE Degreaser 91.7 <1.8 7.7 299 14 1.7 J 28 17 <3.9 <1.7 <2.8 15 <3.2 <3.2 <4.8 2.4 J 3.2 J <3.2 148 <3.5 <2.9 <3.9 1.6 J
HHSS-2 10/4/2018 Former Tooling/Milling 47.5 <1.8 62.9 <8.3 <3.1 <3.5 12 1.3 J <3.9 0.81 J 3.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.2 <4.8 2.8 J 2.9 J <3.2 58.4 18 12 8.4 8.6
HHSS-3 10/4/2018 Former Hazardous Waste Storage Area 449 <1.8 <2.6 <8.3 3.8 <3.5 213 9.0 3.4 J <1.7 <2.8 2.9 J <3.2 <3.2 <4.8 <2.9 3.0 J <3.2 106 <3.5 30 <3.9 <3.3
HHSS-4 10/4/2018 Former Pump/Compressor Room 142 7.5 5.4 <8.3 <3.1 <3.5 23 21 2.8 J <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 26 10 <4.8 <2.9 3.0 J 12 184 3.3 J 20 <3.9 2.6 J
220,000 14 120 850 35 NS 35,000 4,900 41 630 42,000 1.6 580 1,400 1,400 190 700 NS NS 370 490 NS 2,800
2,700,000 180 1,600 11,000 440 NS 440,000 61,000 530 7,900 530,000 20 7,700 18,000 18,000 2,500 8,800 NS NS 4,900 6,100 NS 35,000
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Enviornmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM)
Non-Residential Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) (February 2018)
2) DEQ DWM Non-Residential SGSLs (February 2018)
**Building removed with only concrete slab remaining
Only compounds detected in at least one sample shown
µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; NS = Not Specified; NA = Not Analyzed
J = estimated concentration above laboratory method detection limit and below report limit
Bold indicates concentration exceeds DWM Residential SGSL
Underlined indicates concentrations exceeds DWM Non-Residential SGSL
Non-Residential Screening Level (2)
µg/m3
Warehouse #1
Residential Screening Level (1)
Sa
m
p
l
e
I
D
Sa
m
p
l
i
n
g
D
a
t
e
An
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l
M
e
t
h
o
d
1/4/2018
SSVP-2
SSVP-8
Ar
e
a
o
f
C
o
n
c
e
r
n
Po
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
S
i
t
e
Former Kaiser
Technologies**
TO-15
Warehouse #2
Warehouse #3
Former Henkel
Chemical
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables
9/9/2019
Table 2 (Page 1 of 2)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2
Summary of Sub-Slab Vapor Analytical Results
Kaiser Fluids Tech II
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. AMK-011
SSVP-1 1/4/2018
1/4/2018
2/13/2019
SSVP-3 1/4/2018 Offices
SSVP-4 1/4/2018 Warehouse #1 Storage Room
SSVP-5 1/4/2018 Former Boiler Room
SSVP-6 1/4/2018
SSVP-7 /
Duplicate
1/4/2018
2/13/2019
HHSS-1 10/4/2018 Former TCE Degreaser
HHSS-2 10/4/2018 Former Tooling/Milling
HHSS-3 10/4/2018 Former Hazardous Waste Storage Area
HHSS-4 10/4/2018 Former Pump/Compressor Room
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Enviornmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM)
Non-Residential Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) (February 2018)
2) DEQ DWM Non-Residential SGSLs (February 2018)
**Building removed with only concrete slab remaining
Only compounds detected in at least one sample shown
µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; NS = Not Specified; NA = Not Analyzed
J = estimated concentration above laboratory method detection limit and below report limit
Bold indicates concentration exceeds DWM Residential SGSL
Underlined indicates concentrations exceeds DWM Non-Residential SGSL
Non-Residential Screening Level (2)
Warehouse #1
Residential Screening Level (1)
Sa
m
p
l
e
I
D
Sa
m
p
l
i
n
g
D
a
t
e
An
a
l
y
t
i
c
a
l
M
e
t
h
o
d
1/4/2018
SSVP-2
SSVP-8
Ar
e
a
o
f
C
o
n
c
e
r
n
Po
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
S
i
t
e
Former Kaiser
Technologies**
TO-15
Warehouse #2
Warehouse #3
Former Henkel
Chemical
He
x
a
n
e
2-
H
e
x
a
n
o
n
e
Is
o
p
r
o
p
a
n
o
l
Me
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
C
h
l
o
r
i
d
e
Me
t
h
y
l
I
s
o
b
u
t
y
l
K
e
t
o
n
e
Pr
o
p
y
l
e
n
e
St
y
r
e
n
e
1,
1
,
1
-
T
r
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
a
n
e
1,
2
,
4
-
T
r
i
m
e
t
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
1,
3
,
5
-
T
r
i
m
e
t
h
y
l
b
e
n
z
e
n
e
2,
2
,
4
-
T
r
i
m
e
t
h
y
l
p
e
n
t
a
n
e
Te
r
t
i
a
r
y
B
u
t
y
l
A
l
c
o
h
o
l
Te
t
r
a
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
Te
t
r
a
h
y
d
r
o
f
u
r
a
n
To
l
u
e
n
e
Tr
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
e
t
h
y
l
e
n
e
Tr
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
f
l
u
o
r
o
m
e
t
h
a
n
e
(F
r
e
o
n
1
1
)
1,
1
,
2
-
T
r
i
c
h
l
o
r
o
-
1
,
2
,
2
-
tr
i
f
l
u
o
r
o
e
t
h
a
n
e
(
F
r
e
o
n
1
1
3
)
Vin
y
l
C
h
l
o
r
i
d
e
Vin
y
l
A
c
e
t
a
t
e
m,
p
-
X
y
l
e
n
e
o-
X
y
l
e
n
e
Xy
l
e
n
e
s
(
T
o
t
a
l
)
<2.8 <3.3 125 <2.8 <3.3 <3.4 <3.4 <4.4 <3.9 <3.9 <3.7 1.7 J 12 <2.4 3.8 <0.86 <4.5 <6.1 <2.0 <2.8 2.0 J <3.5 2.0 J
<2.8 <3.3 15 <2.8 2.0 J <3.4 <3.4 <4.4 <3.9 <3.9 <3.7 1.3 J 3.3 <2.4 <3.0 <0.86 <4.5 <6.1 <2.0 <2.8 3.0 J <3.5 3.0 J
<1.2 <0.49 <0.60 <0.84 <0.39 <0.34 <0.53 <0.41 <0.63 <0.62 NA NA 5.8 <0.39 0.99 <0.43 1.6 J <0.93 <0.32 3.1 J <1.0 <0.54 <1.54
<4.2 <4.9 1,360 <4.2 <4.9 <5.3 <5.1 <6.5 <5.9 <5.9 <5.6 6.1 8.1 <3.5 3.8 J <1.3 <6.7 <9.2 <3.1 <4.2 8.7 2.6 J 11
<2.8 2.0 J 33.9 <2.8 2.5 J 2.6 J <3.4 <4.4 <3.9 <3.9 <3.7 4.9 <1.1 <2.4 1.4 J 2.5 <4.5 <6.1 <2.0 <2.8 <3.5 <3.5 <3.5
<2.8 <3.3 8.4 <2.8 <3.3 <3.4 <3.4 <4.4 <3.9 <3.9 <3.7 1.5 J 1.5 <2.4 1.4 J 1.6 <4.5 <6.1 <2.0 <2.8 <3.5 <3.5 <3.5
<2.8 <3.3 <2.0 <2.8 <3.3 1.7 J <3.4 <4.4 <3.9 <3.9 <3.7 1.2 J 168 <2.4 <3.0 12 <4.5 <6.1 <2.0 <2.8 <3.5 <3.5 <3.5
<2.8 <3.3 <2.0 <2.8 <3.3 1.2 J <3.4 <4.4 <3.9 <3.9 <3.7 <2.4 10 <2.4 <3.0 <0.86 <4.5 <6.1 <2.0 <2.8 <3.5 <3.5 <3.5
<2.8 <3.3 <2.0 <2.8 <3.3 1.3 J <3.4 <4.4 <3.9 <3.9 <3.7 <2.4 15 <2.4 <3.0 0.91 <4.5 <6.1 <2.0 <2.8 <3.5 <3.5 <3.5
<2.8 <3.3 36.6 <2.8 <3.3 1.5 J <3.4 3.2 J <3.9 <3.9 <3.7 1.4 J 6.8 <2.4 1.5 J <0.86 <4.5 <6.1 <2.0 <2.8 <3.5 <3.5 <3.5
<1.2 <0.49 2.6 J <0.84 <0.39 <0.34 <0.53 4.6 <0.63 <0.62 NA NA 6.4 <0.39 1.2 <0.43 1.5 J <0.93 <0.32 <0.34 <1.0 <0.54 <1.54
3.0 <3.3 40.3 3.5 <3.3 10 <3.4 228 <3.9 <3.9 <3.7 3.9 161 14 5.7 66.6 3.5 J 3.6 J <2.0 <2.8 4.0 1.8 J 5.6
13 <3.3 8.1 4.5 <3.3 <3.4 2.0 J 2.3 J 28 5.4 4.5 <2.4 3.7 <2.4 9.0 37 2.4 J <6.1 <2.0 <2.8 66 7.8 73.8
1.8 J 155 16 <2.8 191 21.8 <3.4 5.5 <5.9 <3.9 <3.7 83.7 4.8 <2.4 5.3 5.9 2.4 J <6.1 <2.0 12 4.0 <3.5 4.0
2.5 J 2.1 J 45.5 <2.8 <3.3 160 <3.4 86.8 <5.9 <3.9 <3.7 6.7 113 <2.4 5.7 493 <4.5 <6.1 1.7 J <2.8 13 4.2 17
4,900 210 1,400 4,200 35,000 21,000 7,000 35,000 420 420 NS NS 280 14,000 35,000 14 NS 35,000 56 1,400 700 700 700
61,000 2,600 18,000 53,000 260,000 260,000 88,000 440,000 5,300 5,300 NS NS 3,500 180,000 440,000 180 NS 440,000 2,800 18,000 8,800 8,800 8,800
µg/m3
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables
9/9/2019
Table 2 (Page 2 of 2)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 5
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Kaiser Fluids Tech II
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. AMK-011
Portion of Site
Area of Concern
Downgradient Portion
of Site
Former Settling Tank
Excavation Area Former TCE Degreaser Loading Dock
Former R&D Lab /
Downgradient Portion
of Site
Former AST Area Western Portion of Site
Sample ID HHTMW-1 HHTMW-2 HHTMW-3 HHTMW-4 HHTMW-5 HHTMW-6 MW-2 MW-3 Trip Blank
Date 10/2/2018 10/4/2018 10/4/2018 10/4/2018 10/4/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018
VOCs (8260) µg/LAcetone 6,000 4,500,000 19,000,000 <0.31 15 8.5 J 16 7.6 J <0.31 <0.31 <0.31 NA NA <0.31 <0.31 <0.31
Chlorobenzene 50 82 340 <0.062 <0.062 <0.062 <0.062 <0.062 0.56 J <0.062 <0.062 NA NA <0.062 <0.062 <0.0621,1-Dichloroethane 6 76 330 <0.083 1.4 <0.083 2.0 <0.083 <0.083 <0.083 <0.083 NA NA <0.083 <0.083 <0.083
1,1-Dichloroethylene 7 39 160 0.53 J <0.083 <0.083 1.8 <0.083 <0.083 <0.083 <0.083 NA NA <0.083 <0.083 <0.083
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 70 NS NS <0.056 <0.056 <0.056 26 <0.056 <0.056 <0.056 <0.056 NA NA <0.056 <0.056 <0.056
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 100 NS NS <0.094 <0.094 <0.094 0.50 J <0.094 <0.094 <0.094 <0.094 NA NA <0.094 <0.094 <0.094
1,4-Dioxane 3 29,000 130,000 <14 <14 <14 300 <14 <14 <14 64 J NA NA <14 <14 <14
Ethylbenzene 600 35 150 0.73 J <0.061 <0.061 <0.061 <0.061 <0.061 <0.061 <0.061 NA NA <0.061 <0.061 <0.061
Toluene 600 3,800 16,000 <0.044 0.32 J <0.044 0.63 J 0.28 J <0.044 <0.044 <0.044 NA NA <0.044 <0.044 <0.044
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 1,500 6,200 0.50 J 1.4 <0.061 <0.061 <0.061 <0.061 <0.061 <0.061 NA NA <0.061 <0.061 <0.061
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 200 48 200 3.1 J 1.1 J <0.079 <0.079 <0.079 <0.079 <0.079 <0.079 NA NA <0.079 <0.079 <0.079Trichloroethylene314.4 <0.078 <0.078 0.65 J 1.4 J <0.078 <0.078 <0.078 <0.078 NA NA <0.078 <0.078 <0.078
Vinyl Chloride 0.03 1.5 25 <0.097 <0.097 <0.097 0.61 J <0.097 <0.097 <0.097 <0.097 NA NA <0.097 <0.097 <0.097
m+p Xylene 500 71 300 3.0 <0.12 0.55 J <0.12 <0.12 <0.12 <0.12 <0.12 NA NA <0.12 <0.12 <0.12o-Xylene 500 98 410 1.1 <0.044 <0.044 <0.044 <0.044 <0.044 <0.044 <0.044 NA NA <0.044 <0.044 <0.044
SVOCs (8270) µg/LPentachlorophenol 0.3 NS NS <1.3 <1.3 <1.2 <1.2 12 <1.2 <1.2 <1.2 NA NA <1.2 <1.2
Metals (6020/7471) µg/L
Arsenic 10 NS NS 0.31 J 0.17 J 0.64 J 0.53 J 0.62 J 1.6 0.083 J 0.29 J NA NA 0.14 J 0.056 J
Barium 700 NS NS 8.8 1.9 J 93 130 66 81 29 50 NA NA 14 14Cadmium2NSNS<0.078 <0.078 <0.078 <0.078 <0.078 0.12 J <0.078 <0.078 NA NA <0.078 <0.078Chromium (Total)10 NS NS 2.1 20 0.22 J 0.75 J 19 0.34 J 4.6 0.90 J NA NA 3.0 3.0
Lead 15 NS NS 0.38 J 0.18 J 0.12 J 0.21 J 0.31 J 3.6 <0.093 0.18 J NA NA <0.093 <0.093
Mercury 1 0.18 0.75 <0.036 <0.036 <0.036 <0.036 <0.036 0.34 <0.036 61 <0.036 <0.036 <0.036 <0.036
Selenium 20 NS NS 0.66 J <0.63 0.67 J 1.2 J 1.0 J 1.2 J <0.63 <0.63 NA NA 0.82 J <0.63Silver 20 NS NS <0.063 <0.063 0.063 J <0.063 <0.063 <0.063 <0.063 <0.063 NA NA <0.063 <0.063
Turbidity (NTU)------8.57 5.41 6.43 11.60 8.43 6.62 7.46 7.51
Notes:
1) North Carolina 15A NCAC 02L Groundwater Standards (2L Standards) (April 2013)
2) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Residential Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSLs) (February 2018)
3) DEQ - Division of Waste Management (DWM) Non-Residential GWSLs (February 2018)
Only compounds detected in at least one sample shown above
Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L)
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses
Bold values exceed a 2L Standard or DEQ IMACUnderlined values exceed a Residential GWSLBold, italicized, and underlined values exceed 2L and Industrial/Commercial GWSL
J = estimated value between the laboratory detection limit and the laboratory reporting limit
-- = Not Applicable; NS = Not Specified; NA = Not Analyzed; NTU = Nephelometric Turbidity Unit; VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds; SVOCs = Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
8.85
Downgradient Portion of Site
5.04
North Carolina 2L
Groundwater
Standards (1)
Residential Vapor
Intrusion
Groundwater
Screening
Levels (2)
Non-Residential
Vapor Intrusion
Groundwater
Screening
Levels (3)
Former Kaiser Technologies Former Henkel Chemical
West of Warehouse #2
MW-3 / Dup-GW-1 MW-4 / Dup-W
10/3/20182/13/2019
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables
9/9/2019
Table 5 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 6A
Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Kaiser Fluids Tech II
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. AMK-011
Portion of Site
Area of Concern
Former TCE
Degreaser
Paint Booth
Sump
Former Boiler
Room
Former
Tooling /
Milling
Sample ID HHSB-29 HHSB-30 HHSB-31 HHSB-32 HHSB-1 HHSB-2 HHSB-3 HHSB-4 HHSB-5 HHSB-6 HHSB-7 HHSB-8 HHSB-9 HHSB-10
Date 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/1/2018
Depth* (ft bgs)0-2 0-2 0-2 0-2 0-2 4-6 0-2 2-4 0-2 2-4 6-8 2-4 2-4 2-4
VOCs (8260) mg/kg
1,1-Dichloroethane 3.8 17 NA NA NA NA <0.00016 <0.00013 <0.00015 <0.00014 <0.00014 <0.00015 <0.00013 <0.00014 <0.00013 0.035 0.019 0.049
1,1-Dichloroethylene 48 210 NA NA NA NA <0.00026 <0.00020 <0.00023 <0.00022 <0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00021 <0.00022 <0.00020 0.072 0.059 0.12
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 13 190 NA NA NA NA <0.00033 <0.00026 <0.00030 <0.00028 <0.00029 <0.00030 <0.00027 <0.00029 <0.00026 <0.00034 <0.00029 <0.00034
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 12 55 NA NA NA NA <0.00043 <0.00033 <0.00039 <0.00037 <0.00039 <0.00039 <0.00036 <0.00038 <0.00034 <0.00044 <0.00038 <0.00045
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 380 2,000 NA NA NA NA <0.00027 <0.00021 <0.00025 <0.00023 <0.00024 <0.00025 <0.00023 <0.00024 <0.00022 <0.00028 <0.00024 <0.000281,3-Dichlorobenzene NE NE NA NA NA NA <0.00039 <0.00030 <0.00035 <0.00033 <0.00034 <0.00035 <0.00032 <0.00033 <0.00030 <0.00039 <0.00034 <0.000401,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.8 12 NA NA NA NA <0.00023 <0.00018 <0.00021 <0.00020 <0.00020 <0.00021 <0.00019 <0.00020 <0.00018 <0.00023 <0.00020 <0.00024
1,4-Dioxane 5.4 25 NA NA NA NA <0.012 <0.0091 <0.011 <0.010 <0.010 0.12 <0.0097 <0.010 <0.0092 0.12 0.026 J 0.13
Acetone 12,000 140,000 NA NA NA NA 0.12 0.061 <0.0013 <0.0012 <0.0013 <0.0013 0.017 J <0.0012 <0.0011 <0.0014 0.015 J <0.0015
Benzene 1.2 5.4 NA NA NA NA <0.00034 <0.00026 <0.00030 <0.00029 <0.00030 <0.00031 <0.00028 <0.00029 <0.00027 <0.00034 <0.00030 <0.00035
Bromomethane 1.4 6.4 NA NA NA NA 0.0028 J <0.00055 <0.00065 <0.00061 <0.00064 <0.00065 <0.00059 <0.00062 <0.00056 <0.00073 <0.00063 <0.00074Carbon Disulfide 160 740 NA NA NA NA <0.00029 <0.00022 <0.00026 <0.00024 <0.00025 <0.00026 <0.00024 <0.00025 <0.00022 <0.00029 <0.00025 <0.00029Chlorobenzene 58 280 NA NA NA NA <0.00031 <0.00024 <0.00028 <0.00026 <0.00028 <0.00028 <0.00026 <0.00027 <0.00024 <0.00031 <0.00027 <0.00032
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 31 470 NA NA NA NA <0.00025 <0.00019 <0.00022 <0.00021 <0.00022 0.14 0.071 <0.00022 <0.00019 1.6 0.18 0.13
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 310 4,700 NA NA NA NA <0.00035 <0.00027 <0.00031 <0.00030 <0.00031 <0.00031 <0.00029 <0.00030 <0.00027 0.011 0.006 0.012
Ethylbenzene 6.1 27 NA NA NA NA <0.00022 <0.00017 <0.00020 <0.00019 <0.00020 <0.00020 <0.00019 <0.00019 <0.00018 <0.00023 <0.00020 <0.00023
Methylcyclohexane NE NE NA NA NA NA <0.00050 <0.00038 <0.00045 <0.00042 <0.00044 <0.00045 0.0047 J <0.00043 <0.00039 <0.00050 0.0022 J <0.00051
Methyl Acetate 16,000 230,000 NA NA NA NA <0.00088 <0.00068 <0.00079 <0.00075 <0.00078 <0.00079 <0.00073 <0.00076 <0.00069 <0.00089 <0.00078 <0.00091Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)5,500 40,000 NA NA NA NA <0.00053 <0.00041 <0.00047 <0.00045 <0.00047 <0.00048 <0.00044 <0.00046 <0.00041 <0.00053 <0.00046 <0.00054
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 7,000 30,000 NA NA NA NA <0.00050 <0.00038 <0.00045 <0.00042 <0.00044 <0.00045 <0.00041 <0.00043 <0.00039 <0.00050 <0.00044 <0.00051
Trichloroethylene 0.87 4.0 NA NA NA NA <0.00038 <0.00029 <0.00034 <0.00032 <0.00034 0.19 <0.00031 <0.00033 <0.00030 0.0094 0.17 0.57
Vinyl Chloride 0.061 1.7 NA NA NA NA <0.00028 <0.00022 <0.00025 <0.00024 <0.00025 <0.00025 <0.00023 <0.00024 <0.00022 0.016 0.027 0.053
m,p-Xylenes 120 500 NA NA NA NA <0.00054 <0.00041 <0.00048 <0.00046 <0.00048 <0.00049 <0.00044 <0.00047 <0.00042 <0.00054 <0.00047 <0.00055o-Xylene 140 590 NA NA NA NA <0.00024 <0.00018 <0.00021 <0.00020 <0.00021 <0.00022 <0.00020 <0.00021 <0.00019 <0.00024 <0.00021 <0.00025
PCBs (8082) mg/kg
Aroclor 1242 0.23 0.95 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Aroclor 1248 0.23 0.96 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
SVOCs (8270) mg/kg
2-Methylnaphthalene 48 600 NA NA NA NA <0.065 <0.064 <0.072 <0.063 <0.059 <0.072 <0.066 <0.069 <0.067 <0.075 <0.072 <0.073
Acenaphthene 720 9,000 NA NA NA NA <0.055 <0.055 <0.061 <0.054 <0.050 <0.062 <0.056 <0.059 <0.057 <0.064 <0.062 <0.066Benzo(a)anthracene 1.1 21 NA NA NA NA <0.053 <0.053 <0.059 <0.052 <0.049 <0.059 <0.054 <0.057 <0.055 <0.061 <0.059 <0.063
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.11 2.1 NA NA NA NA <0.044 <0.043 <0.048 <0.043 <0.040 <0.049 <0.045 <0.047 <0.045 <0.051 <0.049 <0.052
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.1 21 NA NA NA NA <0.047 <0.047 <0.052 <0.046 <0.043 <0.053 <0.048 <0.050 <0.048 <0.054 <0.052 <0.056
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NE NE NA NA NA NA <0.045 <0.044 <0.049 <0.043 <0.041 <0.050 <0.045 <0.048 <0.046 <0.051 <0.050 <0.053
Chrysene 110 2,100 NA NA NA NA <0.051 <0.051 <0.056 <0.050 <0.047 <0.057 <0.052 <0.055 <0.053 <0.059 <0.057 <0.061
Fluoranthene 480 6,000 NA NA NA NA <0.052 <0.051 <0.057 <0.051 <0.047 <0.058 <0.053 <0.055 <0.053 <0.060 <0.058 <0.062Fluorene 480 6,000 NA NA NA NA <0.058 <0.058 <0.064 <0.057 <0.053 <0.065 <0.059 <0.062 <0.060 <0.067 <0.065 <0.070Pentachlorophenol 1.0 4.0 NA NA NA NA <0.048 <0.047 <0.053 <0.047 <0.044 <0.054 <0.049 <0.051 <0.049 <0.055 <0.053 <0.057
Penenathrene NE NE NA NA NA NA <0.053 <0.052 <0.058 <0.051 <0.048 <0.059 <0.054 <0.056 <0.054 <0.061 <0.059 <0.063Pyrene3604,500 NA NA NA NA <0.054 <0.053 <0.059 <0.052 <0.049 <0.060 <0.054 <0.057 <0.055 <0.062 <0.060 <0.064
Metals (6020/7471/7199) mg/kg
Arsenic 0.68 3.0 3.1 B 3.3 B 3.7 B 3.3 B 8.5 3.3 2.8 2.4 1.5 J 3.1 5.7 2.0 1.6 J 2.7 3.5 2.9
Barium 3,100 47,000 65 E 79 E 62 58 92 40 92 57 51 32 140 57 76 73 330 67
Cadmium 14 200 0.38 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 0.88 J, BL, B 0.19 J 0.030 J 0.042 J 0.031 J 0.037 J 0.038 J 0.13 J 0.038 J 0.070 J 0.063 J 0.21 J 0.059 J
Chromium (Total)NE NE 46 35 50 37 19 33 39 44 19 33 64 57 40 50 52 59Hexavalent Chromium 0.31 6.5 0.18 J 0.38 J 0.44 J 0.25 J 1.5 0.25 J 0.48 J 0.20 J 0.54 0.61 J <0.57 0.33 J 0.58 <0.64 1.04 0.57 J
Trivalent Chromium**23,000 350,000 45.82 34.62 49.56 36.75 17.5 32.75 38.52 43.8 18.46 32.39 64 56.67 39.42 50 50.96 58.43
Lead 400 800 30 5.8 14 8.7 9.1 10 8.6 4.4 1.6 6.8 22 7.1 3.7 9.4 12 8.3
Mercury 2.3 9.7 0.037 0.014 J 0.028 0.022 J 0.022 J 0.068 0.075 0.16 0.0039 J 0.098 0.028 0.046 0.029 0.057 0.10 0.27
Selenium 78 1,200 3.9 Ac, B 6.7 Ac, B 5.3 Ac, B 2.9 Ac, B 1.8 0.68 J 1.3 J 1.5 0.44 J 1.2 J 5.4 1.1 J 1.8 1.3 J 1.8 2.0 J, Aa
Silver 78 1,200 0.078 J 0.20 J 0.18 J 0.15 J 0.14 J 0.026 J <0.026 <0.023 <0.021 <0.026 0.062 J <0.025 <0.024 <0.027 0.059 J 0.036 J
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB)
Health Based Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (May 2019)
* = VOCs were collected as grab samples from within the specified interval
**Trivalent Chromium = Chromium (Total) - Hexavalent Chromium
*** Two values were reported by the laboratory for detections of hexavalent chromium. Only the higher of the two values is shown on this table.
BOLD indicates concentration exceeds the Residential PSRGs and background for metals
Underline indicates concentration exceeds the Industrial/Commercial PSRGs and background for metals
Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds
NA = not analyzed; NE = not established; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; -- = not applicable
Aa = Final CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.
Ab = Initial CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.
Ac = Initial LLICV recovery outside the control limits. Result may have a low bias.
B = Analyte is found in the associated blank.
E = Estimated concentration above the calibration range.
J = Detected above the laboratory method detection limit but below the laboratory reporting limit. Therefore, the concentration reported is an estimate.
Residential
PSRGs (1)
(mg/kg)
Industrial/
Commercial
PSRGs (1)
(mg/kg)4-6
Screening Criteria
Former Kaiser Technologies
Northern Portion of Site Loading Dock
10/1/2018
HHSB-11 / DUP-S1
Site Specific Background
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables9/9/2019
Table 6A (Page 1 of 5)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 6A
Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Kaiser Fluids Tech II
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. AMK-011
Portion of Site
Area of Concern
Sample ID HHSB-29 HHSB-30 HHSB-31 HHSB-32
Date 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018
Depth* (ft bgs)0-2 0-2 0-2 0-2
VOCs (8260) mg/kg
1,1-Dichloroethane 3.8 17 NA NA NA NA
1,1-Dichloroethylene 48 210 NA NA NA NA
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 13 190 NA NA NA NA
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 12 55 NA NA NA NA
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 380 2,000 NA NA NA NA1,3-Dichlorobenzene NE NE NA NA NA NA1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.8 12 NA NA NA NA
1,4-Dioxane 5.4 25 NA NA NA NA
Acetone 12,000 140,000 NA NA NA NA
Benzene 1.2 5.4 NA NA NA NA
Bromomethane 1.4 6.4 NA NA NA NACarbon Disulfide 160 740 NA NA NA NAChlorobenzene58280NANANANA
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 31 470 NA NA NA NA
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 310 4,700 NA NA NA NA
Ethylbenzene 6.1 27 NA NA NA NA
Methylcyclohexane NE NE NA NA NA NA
Methyl Acetate 16,000 230,000 NA NA NA NAMethyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)5,500 40,000 NA NA NA NA
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 7,000 30,000 NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethylene 0.87 4.0 NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 0.061 1.7 NA NA NA NA
m,p-Xylenes 120 500 NA NA NA NAo-Xylene 140 590 NA NA NA NA
PCBs (8082) mg/kg
Aroclor 1242 0.23 0.95 NA NA NA NA
Aroclor 1248 0.23 0.96 NA NA NA NA
SVOCs (8270) mg/kg
2-Methylnaphthalene 48 600 NA NA NA NA
Acenaphthene 720 9,000 NA NA NA NABenzo(a)anthracene 1.1 21 NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.11 2.1 NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.1 21 NA NA NA NA
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NE NE NA NA NA NA
Chrysene 110 2,100 NA NA NA NA
Fluoranthene 480 6,000 NA NA NA NAFluorene4806,000 NA NA NA NAPentachlorophenol1.0 4.0 NA NA NA NA
Penenathrene NE NE NA NA NA NAPyrene3604,500 NA NA NA NA
Metals (6020/7471/7199) mg/kg
Arsenic 0.68 3.0 3.1 B 3.3 B 3.7 B 3.3 B
Barium 3,100 47,000 65 E 79 E 62 58
Cadmium 14 200 0.38 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 0.88 J, BL, B
Chromium (Total)NE NE 46 35 50 37Hexavalent Chromium 0.31 6.5 0.18 J 0.38 J 0.44 J 0.25 J
Trivalent Chromium**23,000 350,000 45.82 34.62 49.56 36.75
Lead 400 800 30 5.8 14 8.7
Mercury 2.3 9.7 0.037 0.014 J 0.028 0.022 J
Selenium 78 1,200 3.9 Ac, B 6.7 Ac, B 5.3 Ac, B 2.9 Ac, B
Silver 78 1,200 0.078 J 0.20 J 0.18 J 0.15 J
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB)
Health Based Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (May 2019)
* = VOCs were collected as grab samples from within the specified interval
**Trivalent Chromium = Chromium (Total) - Hexavalent Chromium
*** Two values were reported by the laboratory for detections of hexavalent chromium. Only the higher of the two values is shown on this table.
BOLD indicates concentration exceeds the Residential PSRGs and background for metals
Underline indicates concentration exceeds the Industrial/Commercial PSRGs and background for metals
Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds
NA = not analyzed; NE = not established; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; -- = not applicable
Aa = Final CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.
Ab = Initial CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.
Ac = Initial LLICV recovery outside the control limits. Result may have a low bias.
B = Analyte is found in the associated blank.
E = Estimated concentration above the calibration range.
J = Detected above the laboratory method detection limit but below the laboratory reporting limit. Therefore, the concentration reported is an estimate.
Residential
PSRGs (1)
(mg/kg)
Industrial/
Commercial
PSRGs (1)
(mg/kg)
Screening Criteria Site Specific Background
Northwest
Portion of Site
HHSB-12 HHSB-13 HHSB-14 HHSB-15 HHSB-16
10/3/2018 10/1/2018 10/1/2018 10/1/2018 2/6/2019 2/6/2019 2/6/2019 2/6/2019 2/6/2019 2/6/2019 2/6/2019 2/6/2019 2/6/2019 10/3/2018
8-10 4-6 0-4 8-10 0-4 8-10 0-3 0-4 8-10 0-4 8-10 0-2 8-10 0-2
<0.00016 <0.00014 <0.00020 <0.00018 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00015
<0.00025 <0.00022 <0.00032 <0.00029 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00025
<0.00032 <0.00028 <0.00041 <0.00037 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00032
<0.00042 <0.00037 <0.00053 <0.00048 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00041
<0.00027 <0.00023 <0.00034 <0.00030 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00026<0.00037 <0.00033 <0.00047 <0.00043 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00037<0.00022 <0.00020 <0.00028 <0.00026 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00022
<0.011 <0.010 <0.014 <0.013 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.011
<0.0014 <0.0012 0.096 <0.0016 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.085
<0.00033 <0.00029 <0.00042 <0.00038 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00032
<0.00070 <0.00062 <0.00088 <0.00080 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00069<0.00028 <0.00024 <0.00035 <0.00032 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00027<0.00030 <0.00026 <0.00038 <0.00034 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00030
<0.00024 <0.00021 <0.00030 <0.00028 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00024
<0.00034 <0.00030 <0.00043 <0.00039 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00033
<0.00022 <0.00019 0.0046 J <0.00025 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00021
<0.00048 <0.00043 <0.00061 <0.00055 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00047
<0.00085 <0.00075 <0.0011 <0.00098 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00084<0.00051 <0.00045 <0.00065 <0.00059 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00050
<0.00048 <0.00043 <0.00061 <0.00055 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00047
<0.00037 <0.00032 <0.00046 <0.00042 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00036
<0.00027 <0.00024 <0.00035 <0.00031 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00027
<0.00052 <0.00046 0.024 <0.00060 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00051<0.00023 <0.00020 0.0098 <0.00027 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00023
<0.018 0.034 J 0.041 J 270 <0.016 14 <0.015 <0.019 <0.019 <0.014 <0.018 <0.016 <0.018 <0.018 <0.019 <0.019
<0.013 <0.013 <0.014 <0.014 0.28 <0.014 16 <0.014 <0.014 0.046 J <0.014 0.15 <0.014 <0.013 <0.014 <0.014
<0.071 <0.071 <0.071 <0.073 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.076
<0.061 <0.060 <0.061 <0.062 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.065<0.058 <0.058 <0.058 <0.059 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.062
<0.048 <0.048 <0.048 <0.049 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.052
<0.052 <0.051 <0.052 <0.053 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.055
<0.049 <0.048 <0.049 <0.050 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.052
<0.056 <0.056 <0.056 <0.057 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.060
<0.057 <0.056 0.14 J <0.058 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.061<0.064 <0.063 <0.064 <0.065 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.068<0.053 <0.052 0.94 <0.054 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.056
<0.058 <0.057 <0.058 <0.059 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.062<0.059 <0.058 <0.059 <0.060 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.063
0.91 J 2.6 2.7 1.3 J NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.2
110 78 28 J 140 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 44
<0.025 0.032 J 0.035 J 0.041 J NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.027
62 82 20 150 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1700.34 J 2.31 0.82 1.88 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.48
61.66 79.69 19.18 148.12 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 168.52
4.7 14 25 1.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7.0
0.075 0.052 0.051 0.021 J NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.10
0.47 J 1.0 J 0.86 J 0.98 J NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.6
0.087 J <0.025 0.19 J <0.026 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.027
2/6/20219
8-10
Former Henkel Chemical
HHSB-15D
Former R&D Lab
HHSB-15B / DUP-2HHSB-15A HHSB-15C HHSB-15E
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables9/9/2019
Table 6A (Page 2 of 5)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 6A
Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Kaiser Fluids Tech II
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. AMK-011
Portion of Site
Area of Concern
Sample ID HHSB-29 HHSB-30 HHSB-31 HHSB-32
Date 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018
Depth* (ft bgs)0-2 0-2 0-2 0-2
VOCs (8260) mg/kg
1,1-Dichloroethane 3.8 17 NA NA NA NA
1,1-Dichloroethylene 48 210 NA NA NA NA
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 13 190 NA NA NA NA
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 12 55 NA NA NA NA
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 380 2,000 NA NA NA NA1,3-Dichlorobenzene NE NE NA NA NA NA1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.8 12 NA NA NA NA
1,4-Dioxane 5.4 25 NA NA NA NA
Acetone 12,000 140,000 NA NA NA NA
Benzene 1.2 5.4 NA NA NA NA
Bromomethane 1.4 6.4 NA NA NA NACarbon Disulfide 160 740 NA NA NA NAChlorobenzene58280NANANANA
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 31 470 NA NA NA NA
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 310 4,700 NA NA NA NA
Ethylbenzene 6.1 27 NA NA NA NA
Methylcyclohexane NE NE NA NA NA NA
Methyl Acetate 16,000 230,000 NA NA NA NAMethyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)5,500 40,000 NA NA NA NA
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 7,000 30,000 NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethylene 0.87 4.0 NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 0.061 1.7 NA NA NA NA
m,p-Xylenes 120 500 NA NA NA NAo-Xylene 140 590 NA NA NA NA
PCBs (8082) mg/kg
Aroclor 1242 0.23 0.95 NA NA NA NA
Aroclor 1248 0.23 0.96 NA NA NA NA
SVOCs (8270) mg/kg
2-Methylnaphthalene 48 600 NA NA NA NA
Acenaphthene 720 9,000 NA NA NA NABenzo(a)anthracene 1.1 21 NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.11 2.1 NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.1 21 NA NA NA NA
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NE NE NA NA NA NA
Chrysene 110 2,100 NA NA NA NA
Fluoranthene 480 6,000 NA NA NA NAFluorene4806,000 NA NA NA NAPentachlorophenol1.0 4.0 NA NA NA NA
Penenathrene NE NE NA NA NA NAPyrene3604,500 NA NA NA NA
Metals (6020/7471/7199) mg/kg
Arsenic 0.68 3.0 3.1 B 3.3 B 3.7 B 3.3 B
Barium 3,100 47,000 65 E 79 E 62 58
Cadmium 14 200 0.38 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 0.88 J, BL, B
Chromium (Total)NE NE 46 35 50 37Hexavalent Chromium 0.31 6.5 0.18 J 0.38 J 0.44 J 0.25 J
Trivalent Chromium**23,000 350,000 45.82 34.62 49.56 36.75
Lead 400 800 30 5.8 14 8.7
Mercury 2.3 9.7 0.037 0.014 J 0.028 0.022 J
Selenium 78 1,200 3.9 Ac, B 6.7 Ac, B 5.3 Ac, B 2.9 Ac, B
Silver 78 1,200 0.078 J 0.20 J 0.18 J 0.15 J
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB)
Health Based Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (May 2019)
* = VOCs were collected as grab samples from within the specified interval
**Trivalent Chromium = Chromium (Total) - Hexavalent Chromium
*** Two values were reported by the laboratory for detections of hexavalent chromium. Only the higher of the two values is shown on this table.
BOLD indicates concentration exceeds the Residential PSRGs and background for metals
Underline indicates concentration exceeds the Industrial/Commercial PSRGs and background for metals
Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds
NA = not analyzed; NE = not established; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; -- = not applicable
Aa = Final CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.
Ab = Initial CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.
Ac = Initial LLICV recovery outside the control limits. Result may have a low bias.
B = Analyte is found in the associated blank.
E = Estimated concentration above the calibration range.
J = Detected above the laboratory method detection limit but below the laboratory reporting limit. Therefore, the concentration reported is an estimate.
Residential
PSRGs (1)
(mg/kg)
Industrial/
Commercial
PSRGs (1)
(mg/kg)
Screening Criteria Site Specific Background
West of
Warehouse #2
Former
Isopropylene UST
HHSB-17 HHSB-18 HHSB-19 HHSB-20 HHSB-21 HHSB-23 HHSB-24
10/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/2018
6-8 2-4 8-10 4-6 1-3 0-2 6-8
<0.00016 <0.00016 <0.00016 <0.00015 <0.00017 <0.00014 <0.00018 <0.00017 <0.00012
<0.00025 <0.00025 <0.00025 <0.00024 <0.00027 <0.00023 <0.00029 <0.00026 <0.00020
<0.00033 <0.00032 <0.00032 <0.00031 <0.00035 <0.00029 <0.00037 <0.00034 <0.00026
<0.00043 <0.00043 <0.00042 <0.00041 <0.00046 <0.00038 <0.00048 <0.00044 <0.00033
<0.00027 <0.00027 <0.00026 <0.00026 <0.00029 <0.00024 <0.00031 <0.00028 0.0030 J<0.00038 <0.00038 <0.00037 <0.00037 <0.00041 <0.00034 <0.00043 <0.00039 <0.00030<0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00022 <0.00022 <0.00024 <0.00020 <0.00026 <0.00023 0.0085 J
<0.012 <0.012 <0.011 <0.011 <0.013 <0.010 <0.013 <0.012 <0.0091
0.029 0.041 <0.0014 0.038 <0.0015 <0.0012 0.086 0.039 0.026
<0.00034 <0.00033 <0.00033 <0.00032 <0.00036 <0.00030 <0.00038 <0.00035 0.0020 J
<0.00071 <0.00071 <0.00070 <0.00068 <0.00077 <0.00063 <0.00080 <0.00073 <0.00055<0.00028 <0.00028 <0.00028 <0.00027 <0.00030 <0.00025 <0.00032 0.0071 J 0.0082 J<0.00031 <0.00030 <0.00030 <0.00029 <0.00033 <0.00027 <0.00034 0.026 0.12
<0.00025 <0.00024 <0.00024 <0.00024 <0.00026 <0.00022 <0.00028 <0.00025 <0.00019
<0.00034 <0.00034 <0.00034 <0.00033 <0.00037 <0.00031 <0.00039 <0.00036 <0.00027
<0.00022 <0.00022 <0.00022 <0.00021 <0.00024 <0.00020 <0.00025 <0.00023 <0.00017
<0.00049 <0.00049 <0.00048 <0.00047 <0.00053 <0.00044 <0.00055 <0.00051 <0.00038
<0.00087 <0.00086 <0.00085 <0.00083 <0.00094 <0.00077 <0.00098 <0.00090 <0.000680.0046 J <0.00052 <0.00051 <0.00050 <0.00056 <0.00046 0.023 J <0.00054 <0.00041
<0.00049 <0.00049 <0.00048 <0.00047 <0.00053 <0.00044 <0.00055 <0.00051 <0.00038
<0.00037 <0.00037 <0.00037 <0.00036 <0.00040 <0.00033 <0.00042 <0.00039 <0.00029
<0.00028 <0.00028 <0.00027 <0.00027 <0.00030 <0.00025 <0.00031 <0.00029 <0.00022
<0.00053 <0.00053 <0.00052 <0.00051 <0.00057 <0.00047 <0.00060 <0.00055 <0.00041<0.00024 <0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00025 <0.00021 <0.00027 <0.00024 <0.00018
0.044 J 0.032 J <0.019 <0.019 <0.019 <0.017 <0.019 <0.018 <0.016
<0.015 <0.013 <0.014 <0.014 <0.014 <0.012 <0.014 <0.013 <0.012
<0.078 <0.068 <0.073 <0.075 <0.074 <0.066 <0.076 <0.070 <0.064
<0.066 <0.058 <0.063 <0.064 <0.063 0.69 <0.064 <0.060 <0.054<0.064 <0.056 <0.060 <0.061 <0.060 1.2 <0.062 <0.057 <0.052<0.053 <0.046 <0.050 <0.050 <0.050 0.47 <0.051 <0.048 <0.043
<0.056 <0.049 <0.053 <0.054 <0.053 0.38 J <0.055 <0.051 <0.046
<0.053 <0.047 <0.050 <0.051 <0.051 0.18 J <0.052 <0.048 <0.044
<0.061 <0.053 <0.058 <0.059 <0.058 1.5 <0.060 <0.055 <0.050
<0.062 <0.054 <0.059 <0.060 <0.059 0.49 <0.060 <0.056 <0.051<0.070 <0.061 <0.066 <0.067 <0.066 0.79 <0.068 <0.063 <0.058<0.058 <0.050 <0.054 <0.055 <0.054 <0.048 <0.056 <0.052 <0.047
<0.063 <0.055 <0.060 <0.061 <0.060 2.4 <0.062 <0.057 <0.052
<0.064 <0.056 <0.061 <0.062 <0.061 1.7 <0.063 <0.058 <0.053
3.0 4.4 1.7 J 2.5 1.4 J 1.2 J 1.2 J 5.6 1.8
74 32 110 80 99 48 57 68 83
0.045 J <0.024 0.048 J 0.037 J <0.026 <0.024 <0.027 <0.025 0.035 J
55 80 110 49 12 120 120 62 311.35 0.65 0.84 1.69 0.32 0.45 0.66 <0.55 <0.54
53.65 79.35 109.16 47.31 11.68 119.55 119.34 62 31
8.9 10 4.0 13 8.4 7.0 14.0 11 8.9
0.0015 J 0.031 0.0084 J 0.052 0.019 J 0.021 J 0.021 J 0.075 0.036
1.8 1.2 J 1.8 1.8 <0.29 Ab, B <0.26 Ab, B 0.42 J, Aa 0.94 J, Ab, B 1.2 J, Ab, B
<0.028 0.033 J <0.026 <0.027 <0.026 <0.024 <0.027 0.030 J <0.023
2-4
West-Central Portion of Site
Former Henkel Chemical
10/3/2018
Former Storage Building
HHSB-22 / DUP-S2
Former Rail Spur
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables9/9/2019
Table 6A (Page 3 of 5)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 6A
Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Kaiser Fluids Tech II
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. AMK-011
Portion of Site
Area of Concern
Sample ID HHSB-29 HHSB-30 HHSB-31 HHSB-32
Date 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018
Depth* (ft bgs)0-2 0-2 0-2 0-2
VOCs (8260) mg/kg
1,1-Dichloroethane 3.8 17 NA NA NA NA
1,1-Dichloroethylene 48 210 NA NA NA NA
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 13 190 NA NA NA NA
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 12 55 NA NA NA NA
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 380 2,000 NA NA NA NA1,3-Dichlorobenzene NE NE NA NA NA NA1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.8 12 NA NA NA NA
1,4-Dioxane 5.4 25 NA NA NA NA
Acetone 12,000 140,000 NA NA NA NA
Benzene 1.2 5.4 NA NA NA NA
Bromomethane 1.4 6.4 NA NA NA NACarbon Disulfide 160 740 NA NA NA NAChlorobenzene58280NANANANA
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 31 470 NA NA NA NA
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 310 4,700 NA NA NA NA
Ethylbenzene 6.1 27 NA NA NA NA
Methylcyclohexane NE NE NA NA NA NA
Methyl Acetate 16,000 230,000 NA NA NA NAMethyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)5,500 40,000 NA NA NA NA
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 7,000 30,000 NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethylene 0.87 4.0 NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 0.061 1.7 NA NA NA NA
m,p-Xylenes 120 500 NA NA NA NAo-Xylene 140 590 NA NA NA NA
PCBs (8082) mg/kg
Aroclor 1242 0.23 0.95 NA NA NA NA
Aroclor 1248 0.23 0.96 NA NA NA NA
SVOCs (8270) mg/kg
2-Methylnaphthalene 48 600 NA NA NA NA
Acenaphthene 720 9,000 NA NA NA NABenzo(a)anthracene 1.1 21 NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.11 2.1 NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.1 21 NA NA NA NA
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NE NE NA NA NA NA
Chrysene 110 2,100 NA NA NA NA
Fluoranthene 480 6,000 NA NA NA NAFluorene4806,000 NA NA NA NAPentachlorophenol1.0 4.0 NA NA NA NA
Penenathrene NE NE NA NA NA NAPyrene3604,500 NA NA NA NA
Metals (6020/7471/7199) mg/kg
Arsenic 0.68 3.0 3.1 B 3.3 B 3.7 B 3.3 B
Barium 3,100 47,000 65 E 79 E 62 58
Cadmium 14 200 0.38 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 0.88 J, BL, B
Chromium (Total)NE NE 46 35 50 37Hexavalent Chromium 0.31 6.5 0.18 J 0.38 J 0.44 J 0.25 J
Trivalent Chromium**23,000 350,000 45.82 34.62 49.56 36.75
Lead 400 800 30 5.8 14 8.7
Mercury 2.3 9.7 0.037 0.014 J 0.028 0.022 J
Selenium 78 1,200 3.9 Ac, B 6.7 Ac, B 5.3 Ac, B 2.9 Ac, B
Silver 78 1,200 0.078 J 0.20 J 0.18 J 0.15 J
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB)
Health Based Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (May 2019)
* = VOCs were collected as grab samples from within the specified interval
**Trivalent Chromium = Chromium (Total) - Hexavalent Chromium
*** Two values were reported by the laboratory for detections of hexavalent chromium. Only the higher of the two values is shown on this table.
BOLD indicates concentration exceeds the Residential PSRGs and background for metals
Underline indicates concentration exceeds the Industrial/Commercial PSRGs and background for metals
Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds
NA = not analyzed; NE = not established; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; -- = not applicable
Aa = Final CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.
Ab = Initial CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.
Ac = Initial LLICV recovery outside the control limits. Result may have a low bias.
B = Analyte is found in the associated blank.
E = Estimated concentration above the calibration range.
J = Detected above the laboratory method detection limit but below the laboratory reporting limit. Therefore, the concentration reported is an estimate.
Residential
PSRGs (1)
(mg/kg)
Industrial/
Commercial
PSRGs (1)
(mg/kg)
Screening Criteria Site Specific Background Former
Maintenance Shop
HHSB-25 HHSB-26 HHSB-27 HHSB-28
10/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/2018 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 10/3/2018
2-4 2-4 5-7 0-2 0-2 8-10 0-4 8-10 0-2 8-10 2-4
<0.00013 <0.00014 <0.00014 NA NA NA NA NA <0.088 NA NA NA <0.00015
<0.00020 <0.00023 <0.00022 NA NA NA NA NA <0.095 NA NA NA <0.00023
<0.00026 <0.00029 <0.00028 NA NA NA NA NA 0.43 J NA NA NA <0.00030
<0.00034 <0.00038 <0.00037 NA NA NA NA NA 2.5 NA NA NA <0.00039
<0.00021 <0.00024 <0.00023 NA NA NA NA NA 78 NA NA NA 0.0047 J<0.00030 <0.00034 <0.00033 NA NA NA NA NA 9.2 NA NA NA <0.00035<0.00018 0.02 <0.00019 NA NA NA NA NA 6.9 NA NA NA 0.0047 J
<0.0091 0.058 J 0.057 J NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 NA NA NA <0.011
<0.0011 0.012 J <0.0012 NA NA NA NA NA <0.25 NA NA NA <0.0013
<0.00026 0.042 <0.00029 NA NA NA NA NA 0.53 NA NA NA 0.0083
<0.00056 <0.00063 <0.00061 NA NA NA NA NA 0.17 J NA NA NA <0.00065<0.00022 0.0028 J <0.00024 NA NA NA NA NA <0.073 NA NA NA <0.00026<0.00024 6.4 <0.00026 NA NA NA NA NA 5.9 NA NA NA 0.19
<0.00019 <0.00022 <0.00021 NA NA NA NA NA <0.070 NA NA NA <0.00023
<0.00027 <0.00031 <0.00030 NA NA NA NA NA <0.076 NA NA NA <0.00032
<0.00017 <0.00020 <0.00019 NA NA NA NA NA <0.076 NA NA NA <0.00020
<0.00038 <0.00044 <0.00042 NA NA NA NA NA <0.079 NA NA NA <0.00045
<0.00068 <0.00077 <0.00075 NA NA NA NA NA <0.097 NA NA NA <0.00080<0.00041 <0.00046 <0.00045 NA NA NA NA NA <0.054 NA NA NA <0.00048
<0.00038 <0.00044 <0.00042 NA NA NA NA NA <0.058 NA NA NA <0.00045
<0.00029 <0.00033 <0.00032 NA NA NA NA NA <0.072 NA NA NA <0.00034
<0.00022 <0.00025 <0.00024 NA NA NA NA NA <0.092 NA NA NA <0.00026
<0.00042 <0.00047 <0.00046 NA NA NA NA NA 0.17 J NA NA NA <0.00049<0.00018 <0.00021 <0.00020 NA NA NA NA NA <0.073 NA NA NA <0.00022
<0.015 <0.017 <0.016 <0.28 <0.015 <0.015 <0.016 <0.017 <0.018 <0.017 <0.017 <0.016 <0.017
<0.012 <0.013 250 12 <0.011 <0.011 <0.012 <0.012 0.11 <0.013 0.031 J <0.012 0.045 J
<0.061 <0.067 <0.065 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.067
<0.052 <0.057 <0.055 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.057<0.050 <0.055 <0.053 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.055
<0.041 <0.045 <0.044 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.046
<0.044 <0.049 <0.047 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.049
<0.042 <0.046 <0.044 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.046
<0.048 <0.053 <0.051 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.053
<0.049 <0.054 <0.052 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.054<0.055 <0.060 <0.058 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.061<0.045 <0.050 <0.048 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.050
<0.050 <0.055 <0.053 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.055<0.051 <0.056 <0.054 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.056
1.8 3.2 1.3 J NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.6
62 70 57 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 63
0.043 J 0.060 J 0.023 J NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.11 J
59 61 44 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 771.10 <0.49 1.02 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.25 J
57.9 61 42.98 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 76.75
6.6 7.5 8.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 8.7
0.075 0.062 0.024 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.036
1.3 J, Ab, B 2.2 J, Ab, B 1.2 J, Ab, B NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.6 J, Ab, B
<0.022 <0.024 <0.023 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.029 J
2/7/2019
8-10
Former AST Area/Trench Drain
Former Henkel Chemical
HHSB-27B HHSB-27C HHSB-27DHHSB-27A / DUP-3
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables9/9/2019
Table 6A (Page 4 of 5)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 6A
Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Kaiser Fluids Tech II
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. AMK-011
Portion of Site
Area of Concern
Sample ID HHSB-29 HHSB-30 HHSB-31 HHSB-32
Date 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018
Depth* (ft bgs)0-2 0-2 0-2 0-2
VOCs (8260) mg/kg
1,1-Dichloroethane 3.8 17 NA NA NA NA
1,1-Dichloroethylene 48 210 NA NA NA NA
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 13 190 NA NA NA NA
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 12 55 NA NA NA NA
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 380 2,000 NA NA NA NA1,3-Dichlorobenzene NE NE NA NA NA NA1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.8 12 NA NA NA NA
1,4-Dioxane 5.4 25 NA NA NA NA
Acetone 12,000 140,000 NA NA NA NA
Benzene 1.2 5.4 NA NA NA NA
Bromomethane 1.4 6.4 NA NA NA NACarbon Disulfide 160 740 NA NA NA NAChlorobenzene58280NANANANA
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 31 470 NA NA NA NA
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 310 4,700 NA NA NA NA
Ethylbenzene 6.1 27 NA NA NA NA
Methylcyclohexane NE NE NA NA NA NA
Methyl Acetate 16,000 230,000 NA NA NA NAMethyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)5,500 40,000 NA NA NA NA
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 7,000 30,000 NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethylene 0.87 4.0 NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 0.061 1.7 NA NA NA NA
m,p-Xylenes 120 500 NA NA NA NAo-Xylene 140 590 NA NA NA NA
PCBs (8082) mg/kg
Aroclor 1242 0.23 0.95 NA NA NA NA
Aroclor 1248 0.23 0.96 NA NA NA NA
SVOCs (8270) mg/kg
2-Methylnaphthalene 48 600 NA NA NA NA
Acenaphthene 720 9,000 NA NA NA NABenzo(a)anthracene 1.1 21 NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.11 2.1 NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.1 21 NA NA NA NA
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NE NE NA NA NA NA
Chrysene 110 2,100 NA NA NA NA
Fluoranthene 480 6,000 NA NA NA NAFluorene4806,000 NA NA NA NAPentachlorophenol1.0 4.0 NA NA NA NA
Penenathrene NE NE NA NA NA NAPyrene3604,500 NA NA NA NA
Metals (6020/7471/7199) mg/kg
Arsenic 0.68 3.0 3.1 B 3.3 B 3.7 B 3.3 B
Barium 3,100 47,000 65 E 79 E 62 58
Cadmium 14 200 0.38 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 0.88 J, BL, B
Chromium (Total)NE NE 46 35 50 37Hexavalent Chromium 0.31 6.5 0.18 J 0.38 J 0.44 J 0.25 J
Trivalent Chromium**23,000 350,000 45.82 34.62 49.56 36.75
Lead 400 800 30 5.8 14 8.7
Mercury 2.3 9.7 0.037 0.014 J 0.028 0.022 J
Selenium 78 1,200 3.9 Ac, B 6.7 Ac, B 5.3 Ac, B 2.9 Ac, B
Silver 78 1,200 0.078 J 0.20 J 0.18 J 0.15 J
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB)
Health Based Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (May 2019)
* = VOCs were collected as grab samples from within the specified interval
**Trivalent Chromium = Chromium (Total) - Hexavalent Chromium
*** Two values were reported by the laboratory for detections of hexavalent chromium. Only the higher of the two values is shown on this table.
BOLD indicates concentration exceeds the Residential PSRGs and background for metals
Underline indicates concentration exceeds the Industrial/Commercial PSRGs and background for metals
Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds
NA = not analyzed; NE = not established; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; -- = not applicable
Aa = Final CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.
Ab = Initial CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.
Ac = Initial LLICV recovery outside the control limits. Result may have a low bias.
B = Analyte is found in the associated blank.
E = Estimated concentration above the calibration range.
J = Detected above the laboratory method detection limit but below the laboratory reporting limit. Therefore, the concentration reported is an estimate.
Residential
PSRGs (1)
(mg/kg)
Industrial/
Commercial
PSRGs (1)
(mg/kg)
Screening Criteria Site Specific Background
HHSB-34 HHSB-35 HHSB-36 HHSB-38 HHSB-39 W2SB-1 W2SB-2 W2SB-3 W2SB-4 W2SB-5 W2SB-6 W2SB-7 W2SB-8 W2SB-9 W2SB-10
2/6/2019 2/6/2019 2/6/2019 2/6/2019 2/13/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019
0-6 0-6 0-6 0-6 0.5-2 2-4 0-2 4-6 8-10 0-2 0-2 2-4 4-6 0-2 0-2
<0.00016 <0.00016 <0.00016 <0.00015 <0.00018 <0.00017 NA <0.00016 <0.00016 <0.00015 <0.00014 <0.00015 <0.00017 <0.00016 <0.00016 <0.00015 <0.00016
<0.00025 <0.00026 <0.00026 <0.00023 <0.00028 <0.00028 NA <0.00026 <0.00026 <0.00023 <0.00022 <0.00024 <0.00026 <0.00025 <0.00025 <0.00024 <0.00026
<0.00032 <0.00033 <0.00033 <0.00030 <0.00037 <0.00035 NA <0.00033 <0.00033 <0.00030 <0.00029 <0.00031 <0.00034 <0.00032 <0.00032 <0.00031 <0.00034
<0.00042 <0.00044 <0.00043 <0.00039 <0.00048 <0.00046 NA <0.00044 <0.00044 <0.00039 <0.00037 <0.00041 <0.00044 <0.00042 <0.00042 <0.00041 <0.00044
<0.00026 <0.00028 <0.00027 <0.00025 0.0036 A, J <0.00029 NA <0.00028 <0.00028 <0.00025 <0.00024 <0.00026 <0.00028 <0.00026 <0.00026 <0.00026 <0.00028<0.00037 <0.00039 <0.00038 <0.00035 <0.00043 <0.00041 NA <0.00039 <0.00039 <0.00035 <0.00033 <0.00036 <0.00040 <0.00037 <0.00037 <0.00036 <0.00039<0.00022 <0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00021 <0.00025 <0.00025 NA <0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00021 <0.00020 <0.00022 <0.00024 <0.00022 <0.00022 <0.00022 <0.00023
<0.011 <0.012 <0.012 <0.011 <0.013 <0.013 NA <0.012 <0.012 <0.011 <0.010 <0.011 <0.012 <0.011 <0.011 <0.011 <0.012
0.025 0.018 J 0.026 0.038 0.033 <0.0015 NA 0.051 0.037 0.11 0.053 0.14 0.11 0.092 0.033 0.068 0.19
<0.00032 <0.00034 <0.00034 <0.00030 <0.00037 <0.00036 NA <0.00034 <0.00034 <0.00031 <0.00029 <0.00032 <0.00035 <0.00033 <0.00033 <0.00032 <0.00035
<0.00069 <0.00073 <0.00072 <0.00064 <0.00079 <0.00077 NA <0.00072 <0.00073 0.0025 J <0.00062 <0.00068 <0.00074 <0.00069 <0.00069 <0.00068 <0.00073<0.00027 <0.00029 <0.00028 <0.00026 <0.00032 <0.00031 NA <0.00029 <0.00029 <0.00026 <0.00025 <0.00027 <0.00029 <0.00027 <0.00027 <0.00027 <0.00029<0.00030 <0.00031 <0.00031 <0.00028 <0.00034 <0.00033 NA <0.00031 <0.00031 <0.00028 <0.00027 <0.00029 <0.00032 <0.00030 <0.00030 <0.00029 <0.00031
<0.00024 <0.00025 <0.00025 <0.00022 <0.00027 <0.00027 NA <0.00025 <0.00025 <0.00023 <0.00021 <0.00023 <0.00025 <0.00024 <0.00024 <0.00023 <0.00025
<0.00033 <0.00035 <0.00035 <0.00031 <0.00039 <0.00037 NA <0.00035 <0.00035 <0.00032 <0.00030 <0.00033 <0.00036 <0.00034 <0.00034 <0.00033 <0.00035
<0.00021 <0.00023 <0.00022 <0.00020 <0.00025 <0.00024 NA <0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00020 <0.00019 <0.00021 <0.00023 <0.00022 <0.00022 <0.00021 <0.00023
<0.00048 <0.00050 <0.00049 <0.00044 <0.00055 <0.00053 NA <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00045 <0.00043 <0.00047 <0.00051 <0.00048 <0.00048 <0.00047 <0.00051
0.0030 J <0.00089 <0.00088 <0.00079 <0.00097 <0.00094 NA <0.00089 <0.00089 <0.00080 <0.00076 <0.00083 <0.00090 <0.00085 <0.00085 <0.00083 <0.00090<0.00050 <0.00053 <0.00052 <0.00047 <0.00058 <0.00056 NA <0.00053 <0.00053 0.013 J <0.00045 <0.00049 <0.00054 <0.00051 <0.00051 <0.00050 <0.00054
<0.00048 <0.00050 <0.00049 <0.00044 <0.00055 <0.00053 NA <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00045 <0.00043 <0.00047 <0.00051 <0.00048 <0.00048 <0.00047 0.015
<0.00036 <0.00038 <0.00038 <0.00034 <0.00042 <0.00040 NA <0.00038 <0.00038 <0.00034 <0.00033 <0.00035 <0.00039 <0.00036 <0.00036 <0.00036 <0.00038
<0.00027 <0.00029 <0.00028 <0.00025 <0.00031 <0.00030 NA <0.00028 <0.00028 <0.00026 <0.00024 <0.00027 <0.00029 <0.00027 <0.00027 <0.00027 <0.00029
<0.00051 <0.00054 <0.00054 <0.00048 <0.00059 <0.00057 NA <0.00054 <0.00054 <0.00049 <0.00046 <0.00050 <0.00055 <0.00052 <0.00052 <0.00051 <0.00055<0.00023 <0.00024 <0.00024 <0.00021 <0.00026 <0.00026 NA <0.00024 <0.00024 <0.00022 <0.00021 <0.00022 <0.00025 <0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00024
<0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.017 <0.017 <0.019 NA <0.018 <0.018 <0.017 <0.016 <0.018 <0.017 <0.017 <0.018 <0.017 <0.018
<0.014 <0.014 <0.013 <0.013 <0.013 <0.014 NA <0.013 <0.013 <0.013 <0.012 <0.013 <0.016 <0.013 <0.014 <0.013 <0.013
<0.072 <0.072 <0.071 <0.066 <0.068 <0.075 NA 0.26 J <0.072 <0.067 0.11 J <0.071 <0.069 <0.069 <0.072 <0.068 <0.071
<0.061 <0.062 <0.061 <0.056 <0.058 <0.064 NA <0.059 <0.061 <0.057 <0.056 <0.060 <0.059 <0.059 <0.061 <0.057 <0.060<0.059 <0.059 <0.058 <0.054 <0.056 <0.062 NA <0.057 <0.059 <0.055 <0.054 <0.058 <0.056 <0.056 <0.059 <0.055 <0.058
<0.049 <0.049 <0.048 <0.045 <0.046 <0.051 NA <0.047 <0.048 <0.046 <0.044 <0.048 <0.047 <0.047 <0.049 <0.046 <0.048
<0.052 <0.053 <0.052 <0.048 <0.050 <0.055 NA <0.051 <0.052 <0.049 <0.047 <0.051 <0.050 <0.050 <0.052 <0.049 <0.052
<0.050 <0.050 <0.049 <0.045 <0.047 <0.052 NA <0.048 <0.049 <0.046 <0.045 <0.049 <0.047 <0.047 <0.049 <0.046 <0.049
<0.057 <0.057 <0.056 <0.052 <0.054 <0.059 NA <0.055 <0.056 <0.053 <0.052 <0.056 <0.054 <0.054 <0.057 <0.053 <0.056
<0.058 <0.058 <0.057 <0.053 <0.055 <0.060 NA <0.056 <0.057 <0.054 <0.052 <0.057 <0.055 <0.055 <0.057 <0.054 <0.057<0.065 <0.065 <0.064 <0.059 <0.061 <0.068 NA <0.063 <0.064 <0.061 <0.059 <0.064 <0.062 <0.062 <0.064 <0.061 <0.064<0.053 <0.053 <0.053 <0.049 <0.050 <0.056 NA <0.052 <0.053 <0.050 <0.048 <0.052 <0.051 <0.051 <0.053 <0.050 <0.053
<0.059 <0.059 <0.058 <0.054 <0.056 <0.061 NA <0.057 <0.058 <0.055 <0.053 <0.058 <0.056 <0.056 <0.058 <0.055 <0.058<0.060 <0.060 <0.059 <0.055 <0.057 <0.062 NA <0.058 <0.059 <0.056 <0.054 <0.059 <0.057 <0.057 <0.059 <0.056 <0.059
4.3 2.5 2.7 4.4 4.1 2.3 NA 2.7 2.6 2.5 5.1 2.7 2.7 2.4 2.7 2.9 2.4
84 72 190 120 57 36 NA 64 53 26 J 100 73 80 65 130 51 64
0.13 J <0.026 0.047 J 0.024 J <0.025 <0.027 NA <0.025 <0.026 <0.024 <0.024 <0.026 0.029 J <0.025 <0.026 <0.024 <0.026
50 41 34 37 61 33 NA 52 43 23 33 40 54 37 39 39 470.22 J 0.53 J <0.06 <0.06 <0.06 0.25 J NA 0.12 J 0.33 J 0.28 J <0.06 0.44 J 0.53 0.39 J 0.68 0.41 J <0.06
49.78 40.47 34 37 61 32.75 NA 51.88 42.67 22.72 33 39.56 53.47 36.61 38.32 38.59 47
29 7.3 31 9.9 6.1 8.8 NA 8.5 8.6 5.4 15 9.1 8.9 7.1 10 7.7 7.8
0.031 0.036 0.084 0.033 0.084 0.076 0.047 0.029 0.027 0.042 0.027 0.041 0.029 0.023 J 0.013 J 0.035 0.049
1.3 J 1.2 J 0.79 J 3.7 1.1 J 1.6 NA 1.2 J 1.0 J 1.2 J 1.6 1.0 J 1.1 J 1.2 J 1.1 J 1.0 J 1.1 J
0.041 J <0.026 0.057 J 0.049 J <0.025 <0.027 NA <0.025 <0.026 <0.024 0.026 J <0.026 <0.025 <0.025 0.026 J 0.027 J <0.026
0-6
Former Henkel Chemical
Warehouse #2Future Building Addition
2/6/2019
HHSB-37 / DUP-1
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables9/9/2019
Table 6A (Page 5 of 5)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2 (Page 1 of 1)
Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Former Kaiser Fluid Technologies
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. CAT-001
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Charlotte Area Transit System (CAT)\Phase I and II ESAs\Kaiser Fluid Technologies\Tables\Data Tables
12/16/2011
Table 2 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Location
Paint
Booth
Sample ID SB-2 SB-3 SB-5 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8
Date 9/12/2011 9/12/2011 9/13/2011 9/12/2011 9/12/2011 9/12/2011 9/12/2011 9/12/2011 9/12/2011 9/12/2011 9/13/2011 9/13/2011 9/12/2011 9/12/2011 9/13/2011 9/13/2011 9/12/2011 9/12/2011
Depth (ft)0-2 3-4 0-2 0-2 0-2 4-6 0-2 0-2 0-2 0-2 0-2 6-8 0-2 6-8 0-2 4-6 0-2 3-4
TPH-DRO (8015M)<9.1 <8.0 <17 <8.4 <9.1 <8.6 11 73 12 130 <8.7 200 350 <9.2 <8.2 <9.6 95 240 40 NA NA NA NA
Oil & Grease (9071B)240 <46 200 <48 <52 <49 <48 <50 <49 47 <50 <55 <51 <53 <47 <55 47 60 250 NA NA NA NA
PCBs (8082A)ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NA 0.14 1.0 1.0 NA
VOCs plus TICs (8260B)
Acetone <0.019 <0.018 0.047 <0.019 <0.019 <0.018 <0.019 0.019 <0.017 <0.018 <0.018 <0.022 0.036 <0.021 <0.021 <0.020 0.026 <0.021 NA 24 12,000 120,000NA
1,1-Dichloroethane <0.0047 <0.0044 <0.0047 <0.0049 <0.0048 <0.0046 <0.0047 <0.0044 <0.0043 <0.0044 <0.0046 <0.0055 0.13 0.99 <0.0051 <0.0051 <0.0047 <0.0052 NA 0.03 3.3 17 NA
1,1-Dichloroethylene <0.0047 <0.0044 <0.0047 <0.0049 <0.0048 0.0046 <0.0047 <0.0044 <0.0043 <0.0044 <0.0046 <0.0055 0.054 0.62 <0.0051 <0.0051 <0.0047 <0.0052 NA 0.045 48 220 NA
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene <0.0047 <0.0044 <0.0047 <0.0049 0.099 0.18 <0.0047 <0.0044 <0.0043 <0.0044 <0.0046 <0.0055 0.41 2.3 <0.0051 0.26 <0.0047 <0.0052 NA 0.36 32 400 NA
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene <0.0047 <0.0044 <0.0047 <0.0049 0.0060 0.016 <0.0047 <0.0044 <0.0043 <0.0044 <0.0046 <0.0055 <0.0048 0.015 <0.0051 0.010 <0.0047 <0.0052 NA 0.51 30 140 NA
Toluene <0.0047 <0.0044 <0.0047 <0.0049 <0.0048 <0.0046 <0.0047 <0.0044 <0.0043 <0.0044 <0.0046 <0.0055 0.0057 <0.0052 <0.0051 <0.0051 <0.0047 <0.0052 NA 5.5 820 820 NA
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.0047 <0.0044 <0.0047 <0.0049 <0.0048 <0.0046 <0.0047 <0.0044 <0.0043 <0.0044 <0.0046 <0.0055 <0.0048 0.015 <0.0051 <0.0051 <0.0047 <0.0052 NA 1.2 640 640 NA
Trichloroethylene <0.0047 <0.0044 <0.0047 <0.0049 2.0 <2.4 <0.0047 <0.0044 <0.0043 0.0054 <0.0046 <0.0055 0.46 10 <0.0051 0.063 <0.0047 <0.0052 NA 0.018 2.8 14 NA
Vinyl chloride <0.0094 <0.0089 <0.0094 <0.0097 <0.0096 <0.0092 <0.0094 <0.0089 <0.0086 <0.0089 <0.0092 <0.011 0.024 0.12 <0.010 <0.010 <0.0095 <0.010 NA 0.00019 0.06 1.7 NA
Highest TIC ND ND 0.03 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.072 ND ND ND 0.068 0.0073 0.0085 NA NA NA NA NA
RCRA Metals (6010C/7471B)
Mercury 0.088 0.11 0.036 0.048 0.040 0.039 <0.025 0.064 <0.022 <0.024 <0.026 0.051 0.072 0.047 0.053 <0.029 0.050 0.084 NA 1.0 2.0 3.1 0.03 - 0.52
Arsenic <0.65 <0.58 4.7 0.82 0.80 <0.61 <0.59 1.1 0.64 0.69 1.5 <0.69 <0.65 <0.66 1.8 <0.70 1.2 4.1 NA 5.8 0.39 1.6 1.0 - 18
Barium 35 19 100 93 57 51 51 42 60 52 73 130 37 29 36 67 48 1,000 NA 580 3,000 38,000 50 - 1,000
Chromium 23 18 99 66 40 23 61 43 54 82 40 13 20 34 45 10 50 430 NA NS NS NS 7.0 - 300
Lead 5.1 0.97 23 5.8 10 3.8 2.7 7.3 3.7 3.0 2.0 1.7 3.4 5.5 5.8 3.9 12 15 NA 270 400 800 ND - 50
Selenium 0.97 5.2 4.2 5.2 5.3 5.3 3.0 7.1 5.4 3.3 13 7.0 6.9 5.7 10 7.2 5.3 8.8 NA 2.1 78 1,000 <0.1 - 3.9 3
Silver <0.32 <0.29 <0.31 <0.30 <0.33 <0.31 <0.29 <0.31 <0.30 <0.29 <0.32 <0.35 <0.33 <0.33 <0.29 <0.35 <0.29 <0.34 NA 3.4 78 1,000 <500 - 50,000
Chromium VI (7199) 0.315B 1.04 0.502B <0.297 <0.321 <0.316 <0.305 <0.335 <0.300 1.06 <0.325 <0.357 0.644 <0.356 0.562B <0.341 <0.306 <0.344 NA 4 0.29 6 NA
Notes:
Concentrations reported in mg/kg
Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses
Values in bold exceed background levels (if applicable) and a screening level
Only compounds with at least one detection are shown
NA = Not Applicable; NS = Not Specified; mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram;
VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds; SVOCs = Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds; PAHs = Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons;
RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; SRG = Preliminary Soil Remediation Goal
B = The result is between the reporting detection limit (RDL) and the method detection limit (MDL)
AOC = Area of Concern
TIC = Tentatively Identified Compound
1Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch Soil Remediation Goals (SRGs) dated August 2011
2Background values obtained from Elements in North American Soils, Second Edition (2005)
3Background value obtained from(OHPHQW&RQFHQWUDWLRQVLQ6RLOVDQG2WKHU6XUILFLDO0DWHULDOVRIWKH&RQWHUPLQRXV8QLWHG6WDWHV(1984)
AOC #5 AOC #6AOC #1 AOC #2 AOC #3 AOC #4
Range of
Background
Metals
Concentrations in
North Carolina 2
Protection of
Ground Water
SRG
Industrial Health-
Based SRG
SB-4 SB-10SB-9 SB-11 North Carolina
Action Level
SB-13
Residential
Health-Based
SRG
SB-1 DENR Inactive Sites Branch SRGs 1
Former Settling Tank
Excavation Area TCE Degreaser
Compressors,
Receivers, and
Transformer Numerical Control Lathes RCRA Room
Loading Dock and
Former Hazardous
Waste Storage Area
Hydraulic Pump and Compressor Room and
O&R Room Floor Drains Screening Levels
Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)
Monitoring Well Data Summary
Former Kaiser Fluid Technologies
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. CAT-001
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Charlotte Area Transit System (CAT)\Phase I and II ESAs\Kaiser Fluid Technologies\Tables\Data Tables
12/16/2011
Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Temporary TOC Water
Monitoring Well Date Total Screened Depth
Identification Installed Depth (ft bgs) Interval (ft bgs) (ft bgs)
TMW-1 9/12/2011 17 2 - 17 DRY
TMW-2 9/12/2011 23 8 - 23 17.76
TMW-3 9/13/2011 24 9 - 24 16.21
TOC = Top of Casing
ft bgs = feet below ground surface
Table 3 (Page 1 of 1)
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Former Kaiser Fluid Technologies
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. CAT-001
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Charlotte Area Transit System (CAT)\Phase I and II ESAs\Kaiser Fluid Technologies\Tables\Data Tables
12/16/2011
Table 3 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
AOC #3 AOC #4
Location
Sample ID TMW-2 TMW-3
Date 9/14/2011 9/14/2011
Turbidity 29 89 NS
VOCs (8260B)
Bromomethane 2.6 <1.0 NS
Chloroform 0.83 <0.50 70
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 0.66 <0.50 70
PAHs (8270D)ND ND NA
RCRA Metals (6010C/7470A)
Barium 130 56 700
Chromium 21 7.5 10
Chromium VI (7199)25 <25 NS
Notes:
Concentrations reported in μg/l; Bold indicates exceeds standard
Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses
NA = Not Applicable; ND = Not Detected; NS = Not Specified; μg/l = micrograms per liter;
VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds; PAHs = Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
AOC = Area of Concern
1 15A NCAC 2L .0202 Groundwater Standards effective January 1, 2010
Numerical Control
Lathes RCRA Room
North Carolina
Groundwater
Standards1
(μg/l)
Appendix C
Preliminary Site Grading Plan
Appendix D
Preliminary Cut/Fill Analysis
WinEx GRADE Site Report
File: THIRD & URBAN EARTHWORK TAKEOFF Dec 15, 2021 10:55 am
Info: New header info feature Options: Use File..Options to change this line
Start layer: Existing End layer: Proposed Final
COMPREHENSIVE QUANTITIES FOR JOB
Site Adjustments
Existing grades adjusted down by stripping:
6.00 in Stripping Volume (bank) 3916 yd³
Total Strip Volume (Expanded @ 0%) 3916 yd³
Proposed grades adjusted down by subgrade areas:
Residential Buildings/Parking Deck 6.00 in
LD Pavement 10.00 in
South Entrance 10.00 in
Sidewalks 6.00 in
Basic Site Info Area Acres
Total Work Area 209982 ft² 4.82 acres
Existing Surface Area 211448 ft² 4.85 acres
Proposed Surface Area 215096 ft² 4.94 acres
Plan View Area Cut 8927 ft² 0.20 acres
Plan View Area Fill 200652 ft² 4.61 acres
Perimeter 1849 ft
ALL CUT/FILL CALCULATIONS REFLECT THE ABOVE - QUANTITIES FIGURED FROM STRIP TO SUBGRADE
Summary of Job - Total Work Region
Bank Site Cut: 125 yd³
Bank Site Fill: 20449 yd³
Export: 0 yd³
Import Required (Bank): 20324 yd³
Import Required (Estimated): 20324 yd³
Average Haul Distance: 52 ft
Imported Materials: 2597 yd³
Over Excavation :
Side Cut : 0 yd³
Fill Volume : 0 yd³
Cut/Fill Breakdown:
SITE CUTS
Total Bank Cut 125 yd³ Expanded Cut 125 yd³
SITE FILLS
Total Bank Fill 20449 yd³
Borrow Required (Bank) 20324 yd³
IMPORTED MATERIALS
Total Imported Materials 2597 yd³ 4024 tons
Comprised of: Volume Tons
Crushed Stone 2342 yd³ 3513 tons
Asphalt 156 yd³ 312 tons
Brick Paver 99 yd³ 199 tons
WinEx GRADE Region Report
File: THIRD & URBAN EARTHWORK TAKEOFF Dec 15, 2021 10:55 am
Info: New header info feature Options: Use File..Options to change this line
Start layer: Existing End layer: Proposed Final
Subtotals for Region: LD Pavement
Region Adjustments
Downward for Subgrade materials: 10.00 in
Basic Region Info Area Acres
Region Area 12583 ft² 0.29 acres
Existing Surface Area 12645 ft² 0.29 acres
Proposed Surface Area 12639 ft² 0.29 acres
Plan View Area Cut 4024 ft² 0.09 acres
Plan View Area Fill 8518 ft² 0.20 acres
Perimeter 1211 ft
ALL CUT/FILL CALCULATIONS REFLECT THE ABOVE - QUANTITIES FIGURED FROM STRIP TO SUBGRADE
Summary of LD Pavement
Bank Region Cut: 59 yd³
Bank Region Fill: 342 yd³
Region Export: 0 yd³
Region Borrow Required (Bank): 282 yd³
Region Borrow Required (Estimated): 282 yd³
Average Haul Distance: 146 ft
Imported Materials: 390 yd³
Cut/Fill Breakdown: LD Pavement
REGION CUTS
Region Bank Cut 59 yd³ Expanded Cut 59 yd³
REGION FILLS
Region Bank Fill 342 yd³
Borrow Required (Bank) 282 yd³
IMPORTED MATERIALS
Region Imported Materials 390 yd³ 663 tons
Comprised of: Volume Tons
Crushed Stone 234 yd³ 351 tons
Asphalt 156 yd³ 312 tons
WinEx GRADE Region Report
File: THIRD & URBAN EARTHWORK TAKEOFF Dec 15, 2021 10:55 am
Info: New header info feature Options: Use File..Options to change this line
Start layer: Existing End layer: Proposed Final
Subtotals for Region: South Entrance
Region Adjustments
Downward for Subgrade materials: 10.00 in
Basic Region Info Area Acres
Region Area 8045 ft² 0.18 acres
Existing Surface Area 8047 ft² 0.18 acres
Proposed Surface Area 8050 ft² 0.18 acres
Plan View Area Cut 64 ft² 0.00 acres
Plan View Area Fill 7968 ft² 0.18 acres
Perimeter 542 ft
ALL CUT/FILL CALCULATIONS REFLECT THE ABOVE - QUANTITIES FIGURED FROM STRIP TO SUBGRADE
Summary of South Entrance
Bank Region Cut: 0.37 yd³
Bank Region Fill: 214 yd³
Region Export: 0 yd³
Region Borrow Required (Bank): 214 yd³
Region Borrow Required (Estimated): 214 yd³
Average Haul Distance: 114 ft
Imported Materials: 248 yd³
Cut/Fill Breakdown: South Entrance
REGION CUTS
Region Bank Cut 0.37 yd³ Expanded Cut 0.37 yd³
REGION FILLS
Region Bank Fill 214 yd³
Borrow Required (Bank) 214 yd³
IMPORTED MATERIALS
Region Imported Materials 248 yd³ 422 tons
Comprised of: Volume Tons
Crushed Stone 149 yd³ 224 tons
Brick Paver 99 yd³ 199 tons
WinEx GRADE Region Report
File: THIRD & URBAN EARTHWORK TAKEOFF Dec 15, 2021 10:55 am
Info: New header info feature Options: Use File..Options to change this line
Start layer: Existing End layer: Proposed Final
Subtotals for Region: Sidewalks
Region Adjustments
Downward for Subgrade materials: 6.00 in
Basic Region Info Area Acres
Region Area 10148 ft² 0.23 acres
Existing Surface Area 10175 ft² 0.23 acres
Proposed Surface Area 10698 ft² 0.25 acres
Plan View Area Cut 772 ft² 0.02 acres
Plan View Area Fill 9063 ft² 0.21 acres
Perimeter 3020 ft
ALL CUT/FILL CALCULATIONS REFLECT THE ABOVE - QUANTITIES FIGURED FROM STRIP TO SUBGRADE
Summary of Sidewalks
Bank Region Cut: 7.45 yd³
Bank Region Fill: 542 yd³
Region Export: 0 yd³
Region Borrow Required (Bank): 535 yd³
Region Borrow Required (Estimated): 535 yd³
Average Haul Distance: 199 ft
Imported Materials: 198 yd³
Cut/Fill Breakdown: Sidewalks
REGION CUTS
Region Bank Cut 7.45 yd³ Expanded Cut 7.45 yd³
REGION FILLS
Region Bank Fill 542 yd³
Borrow Required (Bank) 535 yd³
IMPORTED MATERIALS
Region Imported Materials 198 yd³ 297 tons
Comprised of: Volume Tons
Crushed Stone 198 yd³ 297 tons
WinEx GRADE Pad Report
File: THIRD & URBAN EARTHWORK TAKEOFF Dec 15, 2021 10:55 am
Info: New header info feature Options: Use File..Options to change this line
Start layer: Existing End layer: Proposed Final
Subtotals for Pad: Residential Buildings/Parking Deck
Pad Adjustments
Downward for Subgrade materials: 6.00 in
Basic Pad Info Area Acres
Pad Area 95078 ft² 2.18 acres
Existing Surface Area 95147 ft² 2.18 acres
Proposed Surface Area 95078 ft² 2.18 acres
Plan View Area Cut 196 ft² 0.00 acres
Plan View Area Fill 94966 ft² 2.18 acres
Perimeter 3047 ft
ALL CUT/FILL CALCULATIONS REFLECT THE ABOVE - QUANTITIES FIGURED FROM STRIP TO SUBGRADE
Summary of Residential Buildings/Parking Deck
Bank Pad Cut: 2.11 yd³
Bank Pad Fill: 12652 yd³
Pad Export: 0 yd³
Pad Borrow Required (Bank): 12650 yd³
Pad Borrow Required (Estimated): 12650 yd³
Average Haul Distance: 218 ft
Imported Materials: 1761 yd³
Cut/Fill Breakdown: Residential Buildings/Parking Deck
PAD CUTS
Pad Bank Cut 2.11 yd³
PAD FILLS
Pad Bank Fill 12652 yd³
Borrow Required (Bank) 12650 yd³
IMPORTED MATERIALS
Pad Imported Materials 1761 yd³ 2641 tons
Comprised of: Volume Tons
Crushed Stone 1761 yd³ 2641 tons
WinEx GRADE Material Report
File: THIRD & URBAN EARTHWORK TAKEOFF Dec 15, 2021 10:55 am
Info: New header info feature Options: Use File..Options to change this line
Start layer: Existing End layer: Proposed Final
Material Totals for Job
Volume Tons
Crushed Stone 2342 yd³ 3513 tons
Residential Buildings/Parking Deck 1761 yd³ 2641 tons
LD Pavement 234 yd³ 351 tons
South Entrance 149 yd³ 224 tons
Sidewalks 198 yd³ 297 tons
Asphalt 156 yd³ 312 tons
LD Pavement 156 yd³ 312 tons
Brick Paver 99 yd³ 199 tons
South Entrance 99 yd³ 199 tons
Appendix E
Construction Schedule
530 - Development Schedule
Page 1 of 1Exported on October 21, 2022 1:48:38 PM EDT