22017-18-092_Motor Pool_Approved EMP_20210913

NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.
The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory -compliant
decision -making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development -related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project,
and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be
cause for a reopener.
The EMP is valid only for the scope of work described herein and must be updated to be
applicable for new phases of redevelopment or after significant changes in applicable
regulatory guidance.
Voluntary Metrics Tab
The NC Brownfields Program updates estimated capital investment (from the Brownfields
Property Application) and estimated jobs created (from the Brownfields Agreement) whenever
possible. As a voluntary measure, you may opt to complete the below information for capital
investment and jobs created as estimated by your final redevelopment plans for the Brownfields
Property:
1. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: $20 million
2. Estimated jobs created:
a. Construction Jobs: 50
b. Full Time Post -Redevelopment Jobs: 5
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Table of Contents
NORTH CAROLINA BROWN FIELDS PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................... 1
GENERAL INFORMATION........................................................................................................................
4
COMMUNICATIONS................................................................................................................................
4
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM...............................................................................
5
REDEVELOPMENTPLANS........................................................................................................................
5
CONTAMINATEDMEDIA.........................................................................................................................
7
PART1. Soil.........................................................................................................................................
7
PART 2. GROUNDWATER.................................................................................................................
16
PART 3. SURFACE WATER..................................................................................................................
17
PART4. SEDIMENT............................................................................................................................
18
PARTS. SOIL VAPOR.........................................................................................................................
18
PART 6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR........................................................................................................
19
PART7. INDOOR AIR.........................................................................................................................
19
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM.............................................................................................
20
CONTINGENCY PLAN — encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials .....................
20
POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING.....................................................................................................
22
APPROVAL SIGNATURES.......................................................................................................................
23
2
EMP Version 2, January 2021

So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.
® Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields' objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.
® Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:
® A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.
® A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.
® Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.
® A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
on site after construction grading.
❑ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e., demolition, etc.).
® A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.
® Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e., soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
® Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
❑ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.
❑ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.
❑ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.
EMP Version 2, January 2021

❑ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.
❑ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.
® If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Date: 9/7/2021 Revision Date (if applicable): Click or tap to enter a date.
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Motor Pool Site Redevelopment
Brownfields Project Number: 22017-18-092
Brownfields Property Address: 415 S Blount St, Raleigh
Brownfields Property Area (acres): 1.33
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ....................... ❑ Yes ® No
If yes enter Permit No.: 11i,1, — +ten horn to enter text
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit............ ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
COMMUNICATIONS
A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE -SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.
Prospective Developer (PD): Person St Apartments, LLC (owner) and Chaucer Investments, LLC
(developer
Contact Person: Owen Williams
Phone Numbers: Office: 919.781.7107
Email: [e-mail]
Contractor for PD: Williams Realty & Building Co., Inc.
Contact Person: Brandon Watson
Phone Numbers: Office: 919.781.7107
Email: [e-mail]
EMP Version 2, January 2021
Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.

Environmental Consultant: Aptus Mgmt, PLLC
Contact Person: John Gallagher, PE
Phone Numbers: Office: 1-1;rl, „r +ao here to enter text. Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Brad Atkinson
Phone Numbers: Office: 919-707-8748 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
Click or tap here to er-r +o.,+
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsitetask:
On -site assessment or remedial activities: .................................................... 10 days Prior
Construction or grading start: .......................................................................... 10 days Prior
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ................................................................................ Within 48 hours
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g., dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures
in area of contamination, ventilation of work zones): ................................... Within 48 hours
Installation of mitigation systems: ................................................................ 10 days Prior
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ................................................................................. Within 30 days
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
®Residential ❑Recreational ❑Institutional ❑Commercial ❑Office ❑Retail ❑ Industrial
❑Other specify:
Mixed use
2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth -moving activities
EMP Version 2, January 2021

at the site:
® Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
® Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
® Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
Redevelopment will occur in two phases. The first phase is construction of a structured parking
deck and apartments built on top of the deck. The second phase is construction of a hotel by
South Blount Hotel, LLC starting in late 2022.
4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
❑ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.
5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
® If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.
6) Which category of risk -based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
® Residential ❑ Non -Residential or Industrial/Commercial
7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 9/30/2021
b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
See attached schedule
c) Additional phases planned? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: Q3 2022
Planned Activity: Hotel construction
6
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Hotel development
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
UICK or Lap here to enter text.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: Click or tap to enter a date.
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Please fill out the sections below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas
of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure overlaying new
construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil: ..............................................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 2. Groundwater: ............................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 3. Surface Water: ..........................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 4. Sediment: ...................................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ..................................................
❑
Yes
❑ No
® Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 6. Sub -Slab Soil Vapor: ..................................
❑
Yes
❑ No
® Suspected
❑ Unknown
Part 7. Indoor Air: ...................................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
❑ Unknown
2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.
PART 1. Soil
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
Lead and petroleum constituents
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
2-3 ft or greater
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
60,000 scl ft (1.3 acres)
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
Nominal excavation — slab on grade construction
7
EMP Version 2, January 2021

5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
3000 for export
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
3000
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
3000
Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated fromthe Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminarydata available).
1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINAT
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ❑Yes ®No
❑ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ If yes, do the soils exceed the "Contained -Out" levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained -In Policy? ................................................. ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED -OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED -IN POLICYTHE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE? .................................... ❑ Yes ® No
❑ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
❑ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ TCLP results 'lick or tap here to enter text.
❑ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
8
EMP Version 2, January 2021

TCLP standard)
Click or tap here to enter text.
® If no, explain rationale:
No data indicating characteristic hazardous wastes are present
d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAYNOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
® Preliminary Health -Based Residential SRGs
® Preliminary Health -Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
® Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
❑ Site -specific risk -based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
-- tap here to enter
Additional comments:
+-, r k r + n+-,- tPXt
3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
® Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
❑ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known
❑ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
k-11L.I. UI Ldp I ICI C LU U1ILCI LCXL.
❑ Manage soil under impervious cap ❑ or clean fill ❑
❑ Describe cap or fill:
-._1K,K UI Ldp I ICI C LU Cnter tei
❑ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re -recorded if
actions are Post -Recordation).
❑ GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
® Other. Please provide a description of the measure:
9
EMP Version 2, January 2021

There will be nominal grading and ground disturbance
4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
® Yes, describe the method will include:
Traditional construction erosion and dust management practices including wetting of soils
to prevent dust creation.
❑ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Field Screening of site soil
® Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
During soil disturbance at the Site, contractors will observe soils for evidence of
potential significantly impacted soil, such as a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or
filled or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e., chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.).
Should the above be noted during Site work, the contractor will contact the project
environmental engineer to observe the suspect condition. If the project environmental
engineer confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures below will
be implemented. In addition, the environmental engineer will contact the DEQ
Brownfields project manager within two business days to advise that person of the
condition.
❑ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Soil Sample Collection
❑ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in -situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
Click or tap here to enter text.
® No, explain rationale:
Collection of additional soil samples is not anticipated based on results of
previous Site assessment activities. If significant soil impact is encountered
during grading and/or installation or removal of utilities, excavation will
proceed only as far as needed to allow grading and/or construction of the
utility to continue and/or only as far as needed to allow alternate corrective
measures described below. Suspect significantly impacted soil excavated
during grading and/or utility line installation or removal will be underlain by
and covered with minimum 10-mil plastic sheeting and stockpiled and
covered in a secure area to allow construction to progress. At least one
representative sample of the soil will be collected for analysis of total VOCs,
10
EMP Version 2, January 2021

SVOCs, and RCRA metals. If the results of analysis of the sample indicate
that the soil could potentially exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous waste
criteria, then the soil will also be analyzed by TCLP for those compounds
that could exceed the toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria. Please
note that total chromium concentrations detected at the Site will be
considered trivalent chromium as no hexavalent chromium has been
detected at the Site and there is no indication that historical operations
included the use of hexavalent chromium containing materials.
Impacted soil will be handled in the manner described below based upon
the laboratory analyses:
i. If no organic compounds are detected in a sample (other than which are
attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts) and metals are below
Residential PSRGs, meet risk levels based on the February 2018 DEQ Risk
Calculator, or are consistent with Site -specific background levels, then
the soil will be deemed suitable for use as on -Site fill. For soil export, the
proposed location(s) for off- Site placement of soil (other than a
permitted facility) along with the receiving facility's written approval for
acceptance of the soil will be provided to DEQ for approval prior to
taking the soil off -site
ii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed DEQ
acceptable risk levels based on the February 2018 DEQ Risk Calculator
(other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or
which are consistent with background levels for metals), the TCLP
concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil may be
used on -Site as fill below an impervious surface, or at least 2 ft of
compacted clean soil. If the impacted soil with concentrations above
acceptable risk levels is moved to an on -Site location, its location and
depth will be documented, covered with a geotextile fabric so that its
location can be identified if encountered in the future, and its location
will be providedto DEQ.
iii. Impacted soil may be transported to a permitted facility such as a
landfill provided that the soil is accepted at the disposal facility. If soil is
transported to a permitted facility, the permitted facility's documentation
for disposal of soil from the Site will be included with the final report. In the
unlikely event that the sample data indicates concentrations above TCLP
hazardous waste criteria, then the soil must be pre-treated or transported
off- site to a permitted disposal facility that can accept or treat hazardous
waste.
If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
11
EMP Version 2, January 2021

® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
_.;ck or tap here to enter tc
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e., Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Cr6+ if needed
® Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:
lick or tap here to t
® Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (Check all thatapply):
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e., Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
12
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, indicate if a work
plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
Following completion of soil disturbance (i.e., after grading and utility construction), an
environmental professional will be contracted to assess the Site for areas that are not
covered with a minimum of 2 ft of clean fill soil or topsoil from a landscaping company,
building foundations, sidewalks, or asphalt or concrete parking areas, driveways or other
impervious surfaces. The clean fill soil or topsoil will be from a landscaping company and
not arranged for sale from an unknown borrow location. If such areas exist, a Work Plan
will be prepared for final grade sampling for DEQ review and approval. If no such areas
exist, documentation will be provided to DEQ.
❑ If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text
Part 1.6. IMPORTED FILL SOIL
NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, "Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner."
Requirements for importing fill:
1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ................................................ ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
According to the grading plan and cut -fill analysis, no fill is expected to be imported other
than for use as structural backfill or small quantities for final grading. Estimated volumes are
—1,500 cubic yards of structurally suitable import material.
3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range
of depths, please list the range.)
0-5 ft
4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
The borrow source for fill material is unknown at this time. But it is likely we would source from
a DEQ-approved quarry (e.g., Wake Stone). Upon final determination of the borrow source, DEQ
will be notified.
13
EMP Version 2, January 2021

5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use atthe Brownfields property.
We plan to import only DEQ approved fill, as may be needed, and do not anticipate further fill
analyses.
6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
❑ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
❑ Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
❑ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or iap nere io enter tex,
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e., Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Fick o. cap here to enter tt.,
7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in -situ
borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought
onto the Brownfields Property.
NA — our plans are currently to import fill only from a DEQ-approved source. If fill is obtained from
a non-DEQ-approved location, a sampling plan will be developed and submitted for DEQ review
prior to fill import.
Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL
NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.
1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.
We anticipate up to 3000 cubic yds of soil may be excess and exported for offsite disposal.
14
EMP Version 2, January 2021

2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
® Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
® Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e., LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting Landfill;
® Landfarm or other treatment facility
® Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property — determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and thata record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
❑ Use as Beneficial Fill off -site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.
3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).
Soil sampling and analysis may be conducted on an as -need basis for the following:
• There may be the need to collect and analyze additional samples as required to obtain
offsite disposal approvals. The particular sampling and analyses will be dictated by the
particular disposal site's requirements.
• While unlikely, additional testing may be conducted at the direction of a CIH or other
contractor safety professional to provide information for hazard assessments and site
safety procedures.
• We know that some portion of the fill excavated for foundations may be impacted. At
the direction of the environmental professional or DEQ, additional testing may be
conducted if unforeseen conditions are encountered or are needed to help with fill
management decision making. Sampling would follow IHSB guidelines and could include
insitu, grab, discrete and composites sampling, depending on the situation. Samples may
be analyzed for VOC, SVOCs, RCRA metals and hexavalent chromium. Additional testing,
as may be needed, would be summarized in a separate plan and provided to DEQ for
approval
Part I.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
❑ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)
15
EMP Version 2, January 2021

® Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original
depth from which it was excavated.
❑ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
❑ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials or provide the results of this evaluation in the
Vapor Mitigation Plan. Note that if vapor mitigation is planned for site buildings, utility
corridors will need to be evaluated as part of mitigation designs:
Click or tap here to enter tex
® If no, include rationale here:
The contractor will observe soil for potential impacts during utility installation. Evidence of
potential impacted soil includes staining, strong odors, waste materials or other concerns
(e.g., chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be noted, the contractor will contact
the environmental engineer. If the environmental engineer confirms that the material may
be impacted, then sampling may be conducted. In addition, the environmental engineer will
contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within two business days to advise on the
condition.
❑ Unknown, details to be provided in the Vapor Mitigation Plan for site buildings
Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Click or tap here to enter text.
PART 2. GROUNDWATER
1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
25-27 ft bgs
2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ®onsite ❑offsite ❑both or ❑unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
Former UST releases
3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
To the southeast
4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, describe these activities:
Click or tap here to enter text.
16
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered
during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent
management of groundwater (e.g., dewateringof groundwater from excavations or
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or
sampling procedures).
Contaminated groundwater if encountered, while unlikely, would be collected and transported
for offsite disposal at a permitted facility.
5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................❑Yes ®No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................❑Yes ❑No
6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
® Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program's intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
❑ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
❑ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
❑ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.
7) Please provide additional details as needed:
slick or tap here to enter text.
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.
PART 3. SURFACE WATER
1) Is surface water present at the property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ❑ Yes ❑ No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g., flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
r,l:-I, -, +.,_ k --- �_ ,.rater tex-
17
EMP Version 2, January 2021

PART 4. SEDIMENT
1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ❑ Yes ® No
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ❑ No
4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.
5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
�nuK or tap nere to enter text.
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
Groundwater:.....® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
Groundwater:.....® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?
Click or tap here to enter text.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during
redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list
activities for management of such contact:
Contractors engaged in ground disturbing activities, including the excavations, foundation
construction and grading, will comply with the applicable provisions of Occupational Health and
Safety Administration (OSHA) regulations, as well as all other applicable federal, State of North
Carolina and local safety regulations.
To comply with OSHA requirements for protection of their work force, contractors and their
safety managers will review site conditions, conduct a workplace exposure assessment and plan
for OSHA compliance and worker protection and training. Control measures, among others, can
18
EMP Version 2, January 2021

include limiting disturbed area (such as during trenching/backfilling), temporarily covering
exposed saturated soils if areas not ready for final backfill, the use of personal protective
equipment, mitigation measures such as venting, and limiting worker entry into trenches and
other subsurface work areas as much as is feasible.
PART 6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in sub -slab soil vapor:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Unknown
Groundwater:.....® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Unknown
2) Groundwater:.....0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown If data indicate that sub -slab soil vapor
concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub -slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ❑0-6 inches ®Other, please
describe:
Based on groundwater contaminant levels, there may be elevated soil gas levels and the potential
for VI risk.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub -slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
0 If no, include rationale here:
There are no existing slabs
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
If exposure to vapors may occur during construction, safety and mitigation measures will be
implemented. For new improvements and construction, a protective VIMS may be installed
at the site. Design of the VIMS will be provided separately.
PART 7. INDOOR AIR
1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk -based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
19
EMP Version 2, January 2021

❑ If no, include rationale here:
UILK ur Lap here w enter text
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:
Click or tap here to enter text.
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
® If no or unknown, include rationale here as well as plans for pre -occupancy sampling, as
necessary:
We are evaluating the need for a VIMS. Groundwater is contaminated above groundwater to soil
vapor guidelines. But, on the other hand, groundwater is 25 bgs and, as a result, unacceptable VI
risks may not be present.
If yes, ❑ VIMS Plan Attached or ❑ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
ck or tap nere to e,iter tex,
VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer
If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
We are evaluating the need for a VIMS. Groundwater is contaminated above groundwater to soil
vapor guidelines. But, on the other hand, groundwater is 25 bgs and, as a result, unacceptable VI
risks may not be present.
Note that approval of this EMP does not imply approval with any vapor intrusion mitigation land
use restrictions or requirements of the recorded or draft Brownfields Agreement and that
separate approval of mitigation measures will be required.
CONTINGENCY PLAN — encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials
In this section, please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, orother waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.
20
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site -specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.
Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
dick or iap nere to enter text.
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
__ }ap here `- '_..
® Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e., Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Hexavalent chromium
Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
Click or tap here to enter te,.
Underground Storage Tanks:
If a UST is encountered, the environmental professional will be consulted to determine the
appropriate course of action. In addition, the Brownfield Program Project Manager will be
informed. The UST will be removed, disposed and the area in the vicinity of the UST assessed for
evidence of a release. The sampling protocol will follow DEQ UST Section guidance; however, we
anticipate the analysis of soil samples would be for VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA metals and Cr (VI) to
allow for risk -based decision making.
Sub -Grade Feature/Pit:
If a sub -grade feature/pit is encountered, the environmental professional will be consulted
to determine the appropriate course of action. In addition, the Brownfield Program Project
Manager will be informed of the discovery. The feature/pit will be assessed to determine if
environmental assessment or cleanup is warranted.
Buried Waste Material:
In the event buried waste is encountered, the environmental professional will be consulted
to determine the appropriate course of action. In addition, the Brownfield Program Project
Manager will be informed of the discovery. The nature of the waste will be evaluated to
determine if environmental assessment or cleanup is warranted.
21
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Re -Use of Impacted Soils On -Site:
Impacted soil may be reused onsite as backfill in accordance with the section above regarding
impacted onsite soils management.
If unknown, impacted soil is identified on -site, management on -site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part I.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on -site.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
® Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on Click or tap to enter a date.
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment -related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).
0 Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site's Brownfields Agreement.
22
EMP Version 2, January 2021

APPROVAL SIGNATURES
Brownfields Project Number: 22017-18-092
Brownfields Project Name: Motor Pool Redevelopment
Prospective Developer: Chaucer Investments, LLC —Owen Williams Date 9/7/2021
Printed Name/Title/Company:Click or to here to enter text. F� SRo`'"9'
p �o "9
Q SEAL ;
024199
9-7-21 w• GASP.•`
Consultant: Aptus Mgmt, PLLC -John Gallagher, PE Date Click or tap to enter a date.
Printed Name/Title/Company: Click or tap here to enter text.
9.13.21
Brownfields Project Manager: Brad Atkinson Date Click or tap to enter a date.
23
EMP Version 2, January 2021

Figure 1
NCBP Diagram for Temporary
Containment of Impacted or Potentially
Impacted Soil
Cross -Section View
Top Plastic Cover Sheeting: Underliner: 1 layer, minimum of 10
(1 Layer, minimum: 10 mil thick) mil thick plastic
Berm
(Straw bales, Weight
composted earth, etc.) (If plastic
cover used)
Land Contaminated Soils
Surface
Map View
Straw Bale Berm
Weight
O
■ Contaminated Soils ■
i
■
o Plastic
Sheeting
Note: Adapted from NC DEQ UST Section "Guidelines for Ex Situ Petroleum Contaminated Soil Remediation" dated December, 1, 2013
24
EMP Version 2, January 2021

From:
Brandon Watson
To:
John Gallagher
Cc:
Alex Dillon
Subject:
Fwd: Person Street Cut/Fill Analysis
Date:
Thursday, August 12, 2021 12:38:35 PM
John,
Please see below.
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Caudle, Rob <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2021 3:45 PM
To: Brandon Watson
Subject: RE: Person Street Cut/Fill Analysis
Sorry about that Brandon, I should've sent it yesterday, see below. I ran a rough calc on 6" stripping
and 8" stripping both options are in export. I talked to Loftee, he said we should actually be able to
use a lot of that existing gravel out there for backfill under the slab but he wasn't sure if we could
use the existing asphalt for backfill. He suggested we get the geotech's recommendation on how
much we need to strip.
Cut
-1667
Cut
-1667
Fill
536
Fill
536
Net
-1131
Net
-1131
6" Stripped
-730
8" Stripped
-965
Net
-1861
Net
-2096
Thanks,
Rob
From: Brandon Watson <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2021 2:47 PM
To: Caudle, Rob <[e-mail]>
Subject: Person Street Cut/Fill Analysis
M.
Would you be able to shoot over the cut/fill analysis for Person Street?
Thanks,
Brandon
Get Outlook for iOS

GENERALNOTES
Im
THE ARCHRECTURAL DRAWINGS SHOULD BE lASEO W
CCNkAJCTKNJ WITH THE CML, STRUCTURAL, MEP, FIRE
PROTECTION DRAWINGS AND SFECIFICATIOJS
BE BROUGHT TO THE
A30 ��
2T-A' 2T-< 2T-A" 2
2
A302
2T f P tl' 3b 0'
DISCREPENOES SHOULD
ATTENTION OF THE ARCHRECT
2 THE CONTRACTOR ENOUID SE ADVIRED THAT THE
AVAILABLE SPACE FOR ROUTING ALL ELEOTRICAL
MECHANICAL, FLUMBING, FIRE PROTECTION AND
DUCTVrCJRK AlMBE LIMITED IN MANY LOCATIONS THE
pONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL O THE TRADER
WOROJECTS KE ADJUSTMENTS OTHE W1 THE
ATING
RFMSACT'SAPPROVAL TO THE KRESUIT THESE
TE FASREWIRED. ANTAEVARK REPERF PERFORM
THE FA0.URE TO COORDINATEWLL BE PERFORMEDBY
THE DONRACTOR AT MO ADOTIO6UL WST TO THE
D E S I G N
GM ER
3 ALL PENETRATgNS OF FIRE RATED ASSEMBLIEbSHALL
125 N. Hamvgtov 5[
ST-S'
6T-SYf'
20-tl' f-0' B', <" ,3-S'
_ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _
_ _
_ _
BE FIRE ELOCNED PNp SEALED PER 11L REPROVED
RA7eigh, NC 27603
ALL COJCEAIED FIRE RATED ASSEM-E5 SHALL BE
pyO pw,TH
♦313
MOevALK eEE avlL rW EATFNTs
SIONAGE INDICATING THE TYPE OF
A ASS MAU_ R T THE FIRE RATING IN HOURS IN LETTERS
p
T IHIOHRE R SEE NCSBC SECTION TER
NO SMALLER D THE
5 CONTRACTOR IS TO REPLACE ALL AREAS OF NEW FIRE
PROOFIND DAMAGED DIMING THE INSTAl1ATIOJ a
IMORK. REPAIR FIRE FROOFING MIDST BE EWAL TO
REWIRED RESISTMICE RATINGS
THE
9,9/836-12810 FAX
a�Pak.�wEwc com
i g
3tb.6'
51..,p�
g DOORS SMALL PE MWNTED MIN.PFROM
INTERIOR FACE OF WALL TO THE EDGE OF THE DOOR
UMESSOTHERWI3E NOTED.
T BLOCKRING AANDREENFORGNJGASSPONEIBLE REWIREOFORTHE
INSTALLATION OF TOLET PARTR ,, TOUET
ACCE6SOR ES. HANORAtlS, A C MttLWORK INDCATEO
\ / % 311'.0'
b
IN THE DRAWINGS
g IIADE
SIAUC FOR PO6RIV TO BE1AG—DAWAV FROM
-
--
^POp!n
=
wb OATS (ErrtRv
IE%i)Ai PEgeoP ST
9 WOODINCONTACT WMASONRI. CONCRETE OR USED
r
\
?ry
UP
ON ROOF IS TO BE PRESSURE PRESERVATNE
10 TREATED
SEALANT BETWEEN ALL DISSIMILAR
MATERIALS. UNO
_
I
_
/
-
-
1
Jt0'-6' I
' FRONDE SEAVNT BETNEEN Wl'DOW B DJOR FRAMES
1 ANDADIACENTWALLSBOTHSIDES.
12
i
Y
-
_
ERACEOTOTSTR TUFEPBOVE,i OC FACET08E
BRACER TO AVOID UTILRIES. WCTS, ETC
13 WALL PART —LEGEND. SEE G, 30
A STUD.DI.E.ONS ARE FACE" FACESTLOIF.O S.)TO FACED
STUD. FACE OF COLUMN&FACE OF MASONRY/METAL
S
1 _
b
FANELB U N O.
1' AILL REMAIN AS IS
i¢I° ,.'
SEE NTERIOR PlAN56ElEVATKKJSOFOR DETAILS&
sE DE NALL
FROVICU ATIEMSE
''..
L , -
�\
I
LESS NOTED
WI,BQRESTR __SE NOTED
10 GwSI-ANT ROOM LOCATIONS TO BE MOISTIME
RE
18 SCHLUTER IITER TRANSITION TO BE USED AT ALL
1 ...
. 0..
I
FLOOR TRANSRONS
2p. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE KNO. W. AS
REOJREDBYLOCALFIREMAR3HAL ..TOR--
ALLATgN
- N
O E SE
21 THE GENERAL OJNTRACTOR TO PRW DE FIRE
$SHERS AS REQURED BY LDCAL CODE AND
EI Fj
LOCALE REMARSHAL GC T0REV ESTABLISHED
'
L
—110 WIMEA�CTPRIORTOBUILDING S
�/
-
f
��ING FOR III WALL MWNTED
ELEVISIONSLi
Q
n'.A" 2r-A"CL
2b 0
d
E
i
N
C
� G
I I
I
2
A3tt
I
`^ IL
b
F
E
b
RESIDENT RESIDENT A1�10
f
Z
E
16
(D
N
t2
-
y
b
Ile
L
Z b
b
_
m
J
N
m
O
U) OZ
3o D
cc, �IS p
g
FLOOR PLAN LEGEND
v
z / OWICE J A8
14 Y
A3.01
E
O --TYRE -SEE A6.10
\ ;,
c
b
40DDOOR NUMBERRYPEYPSEE AB.Ot
/�,�
1H
WALL TYPE SEE G130
8
/ SO,
6
b
27'.4"
b
<T A
- __t1�
FEB FIRE EORNGUGHER ON BRACKET, 42'A11 TO HANOE
FEC FIRE EMINGUISHER CABINET, 42' A F FTOHANDIf
NOT FOR
b
�JIxISE%RM1
— —//_
`
''
® FLOOR CRAW. BEE MEP IXRAWMGS
CONSTRUCTION
LJ
ACCE551&E
VAN OFFEEAND DININ
M
B
i im
C
p
j �I2
SI�IE
t
O
KEYED NOTES
Al
�'
p
so fY�
Al
.0—
SPACES
(3 COMPACT)
PI LEVEL�lbPMKWG
TOTALPARKSIO
HOTE
RESIDEN
,YSPACES
W
I Jog-p'
t
i \`(/
X V
b
T 100
y
I AT p,.
VV��
—JECT 017216
_- __ _
S-S YA- B'-0' 3'-C 12-tl' 2-
_
ee� DATE 0315.2011
C REVISIONS
it812' 9'-IYA" 1b-0" 1W'3tlA"
-_—__—___
3
1'. tl' 2T-P 27'. f'
2-
21T.0" 30.0" t50'
At 02
A3.02
'
o
PC*
i DRAWN BY. Lc✓Dw I
s C C BY. BJ
PARKINGPiR PLAN-
FIRST FLOOR PLAN - PARKING P1
�®
A1.01

Person Street Development Schedule 081821
ID
0
ITask Mode
ITask Name
IDuration
IStart
IFinish
1
WS
?Ok
?Ok
?Ok
?01
PRECONSTRUCTION
3rd SPR Review - Express (COR)
Site Plan Approval
Prepare Final SPR Mylars (WR)
Prepare 1st Record Plat Submittal (WR)
1st Record Plat Submittal (COR)
Prepare 2nd Record Plat Submittal (WR)
2nd Record Plat Submittal (COR)
Prepare Final Record Plat Submittal (WR)
Final Record Plat (WR)
Price GMP Set (WRBCO)
1st Bldg. Permit Review (COR)
Prepare 2nd Bldg. Permit Set (CDA)
2nd Bldg. Permit Review (COR)
Bldg. Permits Issued (COR)
Close Construction Loan for Apts.
Close on Hotel Parcel
CONSTRUCTION
Mobilization & Sitework
Aggregate Piers
Undergrounds
CIP Footings & Vertical
Framing
MEP Rough-In's
Finishes
Turnover
60 days
5 days
1 day
5 days
9 days
14 days
5 days
7 days
5 days
5 days
11 days
15 days
15 days
10 days
1 day
3 days
3 days
390 days
30 days
15 days
30 days
115 days
120 days
120 days
120 days
20 days
Wed 8/25/21
Wed 8/25/21
Wed 9/1/21
Thu 9/2/21
Thu 9/2/21
Wed 9/15/21
Tue 10/5/21
Tue 10/12/21
Thu 10/21/21
Thu 10/28/21
Wed 9/1/21
Thu 9/16/21
Thu 10/7/21
Thu 10/28/21
Thu 11/11/21
Fri 11/12/21
Fri 11/12/21
Thu 9/30/21
Thu 9/30/21
Thu 11/11/21
Thu 12/2/21
Thu 1/13/22
Thu 6/23/22
Thu 8/4/22
Thu 9/15/22
Thu 3/2/23
Tue 11/16/21
Tue 8/31/21
Wed 9/1/21
Wed 9/8/21
Tue 9/14/21
Mon 10/4/21
Mon 10/11/21
Wed 10/20/21
Wed 10/27/21
Wed 11/3/21
Wed 9/15/21
Wed 10/6/21
Wed 10/27/21
Wed 11/10/21
Thu 11/11/21
Tue 11/16/21
Tue 11/16/21
Wed 3/29/23
Wed 11/10/21
Wed 12/1/21
Wed 1/12/22
Wed 6/22/22
Wed 12/7/22
Wed 1/18/23
Wed 3/1/23
Wed 3/29/23
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
00
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 1