Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout25014_Erwin Terrace Apts_Corr_20211123�% CAPITAL November 23, 2021 Via Federal Express and E-Mail (bruce.nicholsongncdenr.gov and sharon.eckardgncdenr.gov) Bruce Nicholson Sharon Eckard North Carolina Brownfields Program Division of Waste Management North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 217 W. Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Re: Response to Determination of No Eligibility and Withdrawal of Brownfields Application for Erwin Terrace Apartments, 806 Lambeth Circle & Erwin Road, NCBP #25014-21-032 Dear Bruce and Sharon: As you know, SLI Capital has been a strong advocate of the North Carolina Brownfields Program and has worked with your Program to successfully redevelop numerous hindered properties over the years. Like those, SLI was excited to partner with DEQ on the Erwin Terrace Apartments, a planned multi- family residential complex serving the Durham and Duke University (particularly Duke Hospital) communities. We were disappointed to receive your September 24, 2021 letter determining that the project is not eligible to receive a brownfields agreement. The letter states that your Program does not believe the property is sufficiently hindered by the contamination caused by the historical underground storage tank release on site. We appreciate the explanation provided in the letter. However, we are especially disappointed in the approach DEQ used in reaching its decision, and in DEQ's determination that the property was not hindered within the meaning of the Brownfields Property Reuse Act. During a lengthy review process, we provided additional information to demonstrate hindrance based on actual and possible contamination through our several conversations and communications on the topic, our provision of additional information confirming our investor's position on the risk posed by the site's environmental history, and subsequent conversations between our attorneys regarding the meaning of "hindrance" under the Act. Yet, DEQ did not waver from its initial position. This project has great public benefit. It is in a qualified federal Opportunity Zone and has the support of the Durham and Duke communities. The placement, design, and financial strategy (OZ investment requirements) for this project were put together with the full anticipation of working within the Brownfields Program. This expectation was based on well -established precedent of sites with similar (in many cases almost identical) circumstances being accepted into and completing the brownfields process. The length of this process and DEQ's ultimate decision not only excludes the project from a CHAR2\2507370v 1 Bruce Nicholson Sharon Eckard November 23, 2021 Page 2 key component of our development plans, but also exacerbates the risks of the project that this Program was designed to help abate. DEQ's decision not to grant eligibility to this project is inconsistent with its previous decisions, and we strongly object to the framework used by DEQ in reaching its decision and the length of time the process has encompassed. However, after carefully weighing the costs (and the fact DEQ timing continues to move at a pace that is unreasonably slow) and benefits of requesting a judicial determination as to the meaning of "hindrance" under the Act, we have decided not to file a contested case petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings and hereby withdraw our brownfields application. Moving forward, however, we lack confidence in DEQ's consistency in applying the standard against which projects are being measured on this and related topics. We encourage DEQ to formalize its metrics for eligibility evaluations to help the development community accurately plan for its engagement with the Program. We appreciate the time and effort your staff put into conversation with our team about this project, and we regret that we are not able to move forward. Please place a copy of this correspondence on Laserfiche as public record of SLI's position, along with other relevant correspondence discussed above. Sincerely, Bryan Kane cc: Mary Katherine Stukes, Moore & Van Allen PLLC Darin McClure, Mid -Atlantic Associates Jay Osborne, NCDEQ CHAR2\2507370v 1