23076_Raleigh MGP II_Final EMP_20210408

W CABARRUS ST
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP)
400 S WEST ST AND 561 AND 600 W CABARRUS ST, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
BROWNFIELDS PROJECT NUMBER: 13022-09-92
(VERSION 1.1)

Prepared for:

NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management
Brownfields Program
217 W Jones St.
Raleigh, NC 27699

Prepared by:

Aptus Management, PLLC
109 Amber Court
Carrboro, NC 27510

NC Firm Engineering License # P-1130

John Gallagher, P.E., RSM

April 8, 2021

CONTENTS

EMP Form

Appendices

Appendix A Site Location Maps and Figures
Appendix B Construction Schedule
Appendix C Brownfields Agreement
Appendix D Redevelopment Plans

1 | P a g e

NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in the
North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.

The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory-compliant
decision-making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP, including
contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have questions.

Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development-related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project, and
approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of the
EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be cause for
a reopener

So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.

☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is
complete and has been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project
Manager.

Extensive site sampling and assessment has been completed associated with
the 2011 BFA, MGP IHSB cleanup, and LUST response action and NFA.
Additional sub-slab soil gas sampling will be conducted in the Clancy & Theys
shop area and former Amtrak building, and soil sampling will be completed in
the area where a swimming pool will be constructed at the depth of
maximum disturbance. Separate workplans for these assessment activities
will be provided.

☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the
project, submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments,
as relevant and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:

2 | P a g e

☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if
available; if not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans
are drafted.

☒ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of
contamination for each media.

☒ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.

☒ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that
would remain on site after construction grading.

☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).

☒ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.

☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e., soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each
impacted media applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☐ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.

☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source,
such as aerial photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site
history, necessary for brownfields approval.

☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow
sources, detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the
Brownfields Property.

☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the
Brownfields Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields
Program Guidelines.

☒ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils
proposed for export and sampling data from those areas.

☒ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the
Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by
a NC Professional Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under
separate cover. (To be submitted under separate cover.)

3 | P a g e

Date: April 8, 2021 Revision Date (if applicable): Click or tap to enter a date.

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: FORMER RALEIGH MGP #2 (aka W Cabarrus St.)

Brownfields Project Number: 13022-09-92

Brownfields Property Address: 400 S West St and 561 and 600 W Cabarrus St, Raleigh, NC
Brownfields Property Area (acres): The site consists of 5.91 acres of land located on three lots. A
Location Map is attached as Figure 1 and the Existing Conditions C1.00 plan prepared by McAdams is
attached as Figure 2.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.

A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site
workers that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water.
Additionally, a copy of the EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during
redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE-SPECIFIC
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.

Prospective Developer (PD): KL PLatform, LLC
Contact Person: Allen McCollum
Phone Numbers: Office: 919.719.3572 Mobile: [phone]
Email: Allen McCollum <[e-mail]>
Contractor for PD: Clancy & Theys
Contact Person: Fleming Herring
Phone Numbers: Office: 919.834.3601 Mobile: [phone]
Email: Fleming Herring <[e-mail]>

Environmental Consultant: Aptus Management, PLLC
Contact Person: John Gallagher, PE Phone Numbers: Office: 919.522.7289 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Brownfields Program Project Manager:
Phone Numbers: Office: 919.707.8294 Mobile: [phone]
Email: Irick, Hayley M <[e-mail]>

Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous
Site)Branch, Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
GENERAL INFORMATION
COMMUNICATIONS

4 | P a g e

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each
box to accept minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of
onsite task:

On-site assessment or remedial activities: ……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior ☒

Construction or grading start: ……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior ☒

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ……………………………………………………………………. Within 48 hours ☒

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g., dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):.…………………………..… Within 48 hours ☒

Installation of mitigation systems: ……………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior ☒

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ………………………………………………………………. Within 30 days ☒

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☒Residential ☐Recreational ☐Institutional ☒Commercial ☒Office ☒Retail ☐Industrial
☒Other specify:
Mixed-use development

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth-
moving activities at the site:
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
☐ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel
lines, utility lines, etc.
☒ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors

3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS

5 | P a g e

The redevelopment program consists of demolition of existing improvements, construction of a
new stormwater culvert through the site and followed by construction of a mixed-use 436,000-
sq-ft building of made up of 443 apartment units. The building is seven levels in total, one
ground level of amenity and commercial areas with six levels of apartments above. The ground
level contains approximately 27,000 square feet of commercial/retail space, 12,250 square feet
of lobby space. A 592-space parking structure is completely wrapped by the commercial and
residential portion.

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in
accordance with applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those
related to lead and asbestos abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards
Control Unit within the Division of Public Health of the North Carolina Department of
Health and Human Services. If available, please provide a copy of your demolition
permit.

5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in
accordance with applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to
install sediment and erosion control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is
approved.
6) Which category of risk-based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified
in the Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential
screening levels shall be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
☒ Residential ☐ Non-Residential or Industrial/Commercial

7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 5/3/2021

b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):

c) Additional phases planned? ☒Yes ☐ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: 2022-2023
Planned Activity:
Redevelopment of the east side of the site. A separate EMP will be provided for additional
future phases of development.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Redevelopment is expected to take on the order 24-30 months to complete. Site work is
anticipated to begin in June 2021. Completion is anticipated to be in November 2023.

6 | P a g e

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date. Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: Summer of 2023

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil: ……………………………………….……………. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater: .……………………….……..……. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water: .……………...……..…………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment:.……………...……..…………….….…… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor:…..…………...……..……………….…. ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Suspected
Part 6. Sub-Slab Soil Vapor: ……...……..…………..… ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air: ...……..…………………………….…... ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Suspected

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach
tabulated data summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample
locations.

1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
The property was home to various industrial operations dating back to the late 1800s, including,
most importantly, a manufactured gas plant (MGP)1 that operated from 1916 until 1953. The
MGP operations caused contamination due to spillage and onsite disposal of tars and other
wastes. By 1989, PSNC Energy Company had dismantled all MGP equipment and structures.
Starting in 2001 and culminating in 2011, PSNC implemented four large-scale cleanup actions
that included removal and offsite disposal of approximately 54,000 tons of contaminated
material and using treatment reagents to degrade the remaining pollution. The remediation was
overseen by DEQ’s Waste Management Division, IHSB, Special Remediation Branch.
The past cleanup actions removed much of the contamination caused by the MGP operations.
Remediation was conducted across the former MGP footprint and the cleanup areas were
backfilled and covered with clean fill to allow site reuse and redevelopment. Nevertheless, un-
remediated contamination remains in some areas below the ground surface in soil and
groundwater.

1 From the 1800’s through the mid-1900’s, before natural gas was available as an energy source, manufactured gas plants (MGPs) existed throughout North Carolina and the United States. These plants used coal and oil to produce a burnable gas for lighting, heating, and cooking. Legacy environmental problems were common at MGP locations.
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
PART 1. Soil – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.

7 | P a g e

In addition to the MGP operations, there were leaking underground storage tanks (USTs) located
next to the Clancy & Theys office building. Clancy & Theys removed the USTs in 1989, responded
to the release and received a Notice of No Further Action (NFA) from DEQ in 2010. Residual
petroleum contamination remains in soil and groundwater in and around the UST cleanup area.
Specific pollutants that remain above DEQ standards and guidelines include chlorinated solvents,
BTEX compounds and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The cleanup areas and the remaining
residual pollution is shown in the attached Brownfields Survey Plat as Figure 3. Known residual
contamination in relation to the existing and proposed stormwater culverts and other site
features is also shown in Figure 4. The extend of the MGP cleanup and areas of clean fill and the
location of the UST tank graves are shown in Figure 5, which also shows the brownfields site
boundaries that will be established by recombination.

2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Contamination extends into the underlying groundwater and may be present from 5-20 bgs.
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):

6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
A total of 14,400 cubic yards
• 50% of Foundation Spoils [2,200 CY]
• 100 % of Deep Foundation Spoils [2,200 CY]
• Culvert trench - [10,000 CY]

7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
Up to 14,400 cubic yards (10,000 cu yd from the culvert trench + 4,400 cu yd from foundations
spoils) may be disposed offsite. However, we will be evaluating the suitability of beneficial reuse
Approximate 100,000 sq ft (2 acres) of land area may be disturbed for grading where material will
be “cut” from the northern portion of the site to provide fill to increase the grade in the southern
portion. Construction of a new stormwater culvert will disturb an additional 25,000 sq ft of the
property for a 25-foot wide by 1,000 linear feet long trench excavated for the culvert.
Proposed grading will include excavations of up to approximately 11 ft in the northern portion of
the site that will occur in previously remediated areas now covered with clean fill.
Footings/pilings/foundations: up to 4 feet below existing grade. The culvert excavations will
extend to 15 ft to 20 ft below ground surface. Most of the culvert construction is in previously
remediated portions of the site, but subsurface contamination may be encountered. See Figure
6a and 6b for site grading and Figure 7 for the box culvert.
The total to be excavated is 29,600 cubic yards, including grading, foundations and culvert
trenching
• Foundation Spoils [4,400 CY]
• Deep Foundation Spoils [2,200 CY]
• Cut to Fill [9,000 CY] – assumed to be clean fill
• Fill disturbed for the culvert trench [14,000 CY]

8 | P a g e

during construction. This will occur in real time as work is underway when we can observe materials
and evaluate structural suitability for reuse. For material excavated from the culvert, in particular, we
will follow DEQ’s “last-out, first-in” principle for both clean and impacted soils that are geotechnically
and structurally suitable for reuse. Where possible, impacted soils will be used as below-grade
backfill in the culvert trench. Therefore, the estimated volume of contaminated soil for disposal may
be decreased.

If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the
Brownfields Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment
activities, please provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill
(approximate areas & volumes are acceptable, if only preliminary data available).

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina
Hazardous Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-
261.35?....................................... ☐Yes ☒No
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding
processes generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results
as needed).
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained-Out” levels in Attachment
1 of the North Carolina Contained-In
Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes ☒ No

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
AND EXCEEDS THE CONTAINED-OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE
NORTH CAROLINA CONTAINED-IN POLICY THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED
ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITHDEQ
HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?................................... ☐ Yes ☒ No
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
☐ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an
individual hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test
method, exceed regulatory TCLP standard)
Click or tap here to enter text.
Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL

9 | P a g e

If no, explain rationale:
The Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) is not used for determining whether
material impacted by manufactured gas plant (MGP) waste is hazardous. MGP-impacted
material is considered a solid waste, but not hazardous. As outlined above, we plan to
evaluate the possible reuse of impacted soil (especially associated with the culvert trench
work) following DEQ’s “last-out, first-in” principle.

d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS
WASTE, THE SOIL MAYNOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED
OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in
place, capped in place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location
and capped, removed offsite):
☒ Preliminary Health-Based Residential SRGs
☐ Preliminary Health-Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
☒ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
☐ Site-specific risk-based cleanup level. Please provide details of
methods used for determination/explanation.
Click or tap here to enter text.

Additional comments:
Click or tap here to enter text.

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property
Boundary, please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement
and documentation of same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil
on site map to Brownfields Project Manager once known
☐ Geotextile to mark depth of
fill material. Provide
description of material:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☒
☒ Describe cap or fill:
Impacted material may be returned to the below-grade excavation areas as backfill where it
originated associated with the stormwater culvert and other utilities. Impacted material may
also be reused as below-grade structural fill under parking and other impervious services.

10 | P a g e

☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-
recorded if actions are Post-Recordation).
☒ GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
☐ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:
Click or tap here to enter text.

4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
☒ Yes, describe the method will include:

☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Field Screening of site soil
☒ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person
conducting field screening:

Traditional construction erosion and dust management practices including wetting of soils
to prevent dust creation.

Stormwater Culvert - During trenching for the culvert, full-time field screening will be
conducted. Unsaturated overburden soil not displaying indications of impacts will be stockpiled
and saved for reuse as trench backfill. Saturated fill may be temporarily stockpiled and
dewatered or otherwise conditioned to address high moisture content before being loaded for
offsite disposal. We will, however, be evaluating reuse of all suitable fill (both clean and
impacted) under DEQ’s “last-out, first-in” principle.
Foundations – Shallow foundation spoils will be field screened and spoils not displaying
indications of impacts will be stockpiled and saved for reuse as onsite backfill. Deep foundation
spoils will be assumed to be impacted and will be temporarily stockpiled and loaded for offsite
disposal.
General Grading – Much of the site was remediated and covered with clean fill or is believed to
be unimpacted- including the western portion of the property outside of the footprint of the
former MGP facility or USTs (See Figures 3, 4 & 5).
Grading will consist of lowering the grade in the northern portion of the site and using the
graded material to increase the grade elevation to the south. Grading is “balanced” meaning if
was designed for the cut and fill quantities to be equal with no net import or export.
During grading, the general contractor and grading contractor will observe for evidence of
potential impacts, such as staining, odors, or waste disposal. If a concern is noted, the
contractor will contact the environmental engineer to investigate the suspect condition. If the
environmental engineer confirms that material is impacted, then the procedures below will be
implemented.

11 | P a g e

Soil Sample Collection
☒ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in‐situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
Historical assessment activities have provided extensive data to characterize the site and to
allow fill management decision making. This includes the extensive testing associated with the
2011 BFA, the four phases of MGP cleanups and LUST response action near the Clancy & Theys
office, which resulted in an NFA.
Additional soil samples will be collected to the depth of maximum disturbance beneath the
proposed pool location. A workplan for the pool-area sampling will be provided to DEQ for
review and approval.
Additional sampling and analysis may be conducted on an as-need basis for the following:
• There may be the need to collect and analyze additional samples as required to obtain
offsite disposal approvals. The particular sampling and analyses will be dictated by the
particular disposal site’s requirements.
• Additional testing may be conducted at the direction of a CIH or other contractor safety
professional to provide information for hazard assessments and site safety procedures.
• We know that some portion of the fill excavated for foundations and the culvert
trench, in particular, will be impacted. We have planned accordingly and have suitable
data from post-cleanup sampling and analyses conducted for the MGP and UST
cleanups to inform the fill management procedures outlined in this EMP, which include
disposal and onsite reuse. But at the direction of the environmental professional or
DEQ, additional testing may be conducted if unforeseen conditions are encountered or
to otherwise help with fill management decision making. Sampling would follow IHSB
guidelines and could include insitu, grab, discrete and composites sampling, depending
on the situation. Samples may be analyzed for VOC, SVOCs, RCRA metals and
hexavalent chromium. Additional testing, as may be needed, would be summarized in a
plan and provided to DEQ for approval

☐ No, explain rationale:
If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260

☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270

☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 6020/7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.

12 | P a g e

☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Hexavalent Chromium EPA Method 7199

☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be
conducted in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology
should provide erosion control, prohibiting contact between surface
water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as needed:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under
buildings or permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade
samples with check boxes below (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270

☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 6020/7471

☒ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) by EPA Method 8081

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199 2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?

3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property?
(If a range of depths, please list the range.)

4) Provide the source of fill, including location, site history, nearby environmental
concerns, etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow
source site history:
We have designed grading to be balanced and construction plans minimize the need for fill
import. Some structurally suitable import material may be needed to achieve final-grade
elevations and other structural applications. We expect this would be 2000 cubic yards or less.
Clean imported fill may be placed as backfill at depths up to 20 ft in the culvert trench, and up to
10 ft elsewhere at the site. Suitable onsite materials will be used where possible for backfilling
before structural fill will be imported.

13 | P a g e

5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to
analyze fill soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable
to the site and can be approved for use at the Brownfields property.

6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270

☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 6020/7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199

7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work
Plan submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location
maps for in-situ borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type
of material to be brought onto the Brownfields Property.

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A
BROWNFIELDS AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN
The borrow source for fill material (if needed) is not known at this time. Upon determination of
the borrow source, DEQ will be notified and the procedures outlined below will be implemented.
If possible, we will use DEQ pre-approved fill suppliers, including Wake Stone’s Knightdale facility.
We will first seek to use fill suppliers which are DEQ-approved. If a candidate fill supplier is
not DEQ-approved, we will provide an analysis plan to demonstrate the fill meets acceptable
standards. Also, for permitted quarries, if not a pre-approved supplier, but on the DEMLR
mining inventory list, in lieu of submitting an analysis plan, one three-point composite sample
representative of the fill for metals and SVOCs and one discrete representative sample for
VOCs will be collected. (see: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-
resources/energy-mineral-land-permits/mining-program)

There is some possibility that we will seek DEQ pre-approval to receive alternative fill, including
from another nearby NC Brownfields site. We currently have no specific plans for this, but there
are several active brownfields sites in greater Durham, and some will be generating excess fill.
We will provide a separate sampling plan if needed.
Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL

14 | P a g e

THE PROGRAM, ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION
POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields
IR 15 for additional details.

1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details
regarding the proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths,
location from which soil will be excavated on site, related sampling results,
etc. Provide a site map with locations of export and sampling results included.

2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
☒ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by landfill)
☐ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e., LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to
be determined by the accepting Landfill
☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility
☐ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property – determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not
increase the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the
receiving Brownfields property, and that a record of the acceptance of such
soil from the property owner of the receiving site is provided to Brownfields.
Please provide additional details below.
☐ Use as Beneficial Fill off-site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill
material. This will also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section.
Additional information is provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details
below.

3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above,
please provide details related to the proposed plans).

☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling
As indicated above, 14,400 cubic yards (Assuming 10,000 cu yd from the culvert trench + ½ of
the foundations spoils+100% of deep foundation spoils) may be exported for offsite disposal.
The quantity exported my be reduced if safe onsite reuse is possible.

We are evaluating ways to reuse impacted but otherwise geotechnically suitable fill material in
a safe manner to minimize offsite disposal. This includes reusing material as backfill in utility
excavations and as below-grade structural fill following DEQ’s last out, first in approach.

We currently do not anticipate export of Brownfields soil for beneficial offsite reuse. Soil and
fill transported from the site will be disposed.

Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES

15 | P a g e

with clean fill (Preferred)

☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and
is not a hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately
the depths they were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a
greater depth than the original depth from which it was excavated.

☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor
transport, and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with
contaminants?
☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ If no, include rationale here:

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:

1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
Groundwater is shallow and may be encountered a 6 ft below ground surface.

2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☒onsite ☒offsite ☒both and
☒unknown sources? Describe source(s):

Groundwater is contaminated by the former MGP, onsite UST releases and other possible
onsite and offsite sources.

3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?

4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
A large trench will be excavated for the installation of a new stormwater box culvert through the center
of the site. Unsaturated overburden soil/fill in the areas where the new convert will be built is expected
to be predominantly uncontaminated based on the prior MGP cleanup work. Some portion of the
saturated soil/fill removed from below the water table for the culvert trench may be impacted and/or
geotechnically unsuitable for re-use. Impacted material that is not a candidate for beneficial reuse as
backfill following DEQ’s “last-out, first-in” principle, will be removed, stockpiled and transported for
offsite disposal.
The contractor will observe all soil for potential impacts during utility installation. Evidence of
potential impacted soil includes a staining, strong odors, waste materials or other concerns (i.e.
chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be noted, the contractor will contact the
environmental engineer. If the environmental engineer confirms that the material may be
impacted, then the procedures outlined Managing On-Site Soil above will be implemented. In
addition, the environmental engineer will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within two
business days to advise that person of the condition.

Groundwater flow is north to south
PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below.

16 | P a g e

☒Yes ☐No
If yes, describe these activities:

Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or sampling procedures).

5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property? .............. ☒Yes ☐No
6) If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?................................................................................................................ ☒Yes ☐No

7) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously unidentified
wells.
☒ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It is
the Brownfields Program’s intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as specified in the
Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring through another section of
DEQ or the EPA.
☒Location of existing monitoring wells marked
☒Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
☐ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further disturbance
until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for abandonment is given.

8) Please provide additional details as needed:
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not permissible. If
monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD be responsible for
replacement of the well.

Groundwater will be encountered during redevelopment activities including, most importantly
during construction of the stormwater box culvert. Groundwater may be encountered during
work on foundations.
Dewatering will be needed for the construction of the stormwater culvert and may be needed
for other foundation construction. Contaminated groundwater dewatering will be collected,
pretreated and discharged to the City of Raleigh POTW under a temporary Industrial User
Permit. A copy of the permit and all associated analytical data and reports will be provided to
DEQ.
There are nine wells that are sampled associated with the IHSB MGP cleanup completed in 2011.
Semiannual sampling is conducted by Hart & Hickman on behalf of Dominion Energy. We have
consulted with Hart & Hickman to review the location of the wells and status of ongoing monitoring
obligations. Some of the IHSB wells are in areas of redevelopment and will be properly abandoned.
As needed, we will ensure the wells continue to be available for monitoring or provide new wells
based on review with Hart & Hickman and DEQ IHSB officials.

17 | P a g e

1) Is surface water present at the property? ☐Yes ☒ No
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes ☒ No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned
redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during
redevelopment activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list
activities for management of such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface
water run-off, stormwater impacts):

1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No

2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No

3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned
redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No

4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.

5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment
activities, list activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):

Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following
vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
Groundwater:.….☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Contaminated groundwater and precipitation will accumulate in the stormwater culvert
excavation area and may accumulate in other foundation construction areas. As indicated
above, dewatering will be needed for the construction of the culvert and may be needed for
other foundation work. Accumulated water will be collected, pretreated and discharged to the
City of Raleigh POTW under a temporary Industrial User Permit.
Conventional stormwater management will be addressed by the NPDES General Construction
Permit issued by the City of Raleigh and associated erosion and sedimental controls that will be
implemented.

PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below.
If impacted sediment is encountered, it will be removed and disposed offsite.
PART 3. SURFACE WATER -Please fill out the information below.
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below.

18 | P a g e

Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
Groundwater:…..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
1) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that
exceed site screening levels. N/A – we do not have soil vapor data
2) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?
No applicable.

3) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
4) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management of
such contact:

1) Are sub-slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) If data indicate that sub-slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels,
attach a map showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub-slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☐0-6 inches
☐Other, please describe:
N/A we do not have sub-slab soil vapor data.

4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub-slab soil vapor during planned
redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
There is the potential for exposure to hazardous substances in soil/fill, groundwater and vapors in
construction activities in areas where impacted materials were not removed during prior site
remediation. Most importantly, for subsurface work, ground disturbance and excavations below the
water table. Construction crews working on the culvert subsurface construction, in particular, have the
highest potential for encountering contaminated media.
Contractors engaged in ground disturbing activities, including the culvert work, excavations,
foundation construction and grading, will comply with the applicable provisions of Occupational
Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) regulations, as well as all other applicable federal, State of
North Carolina and local safety regulations.
To comply with OSHA requirements for protection of their work force, contractors and their safety
managers will review site conditions, conduct a workplace exposure assessment and plan for OSHA
compliance and worker protection and training. Control measures, among others, can include limiting
disturbed area (such as during trenching/backfilling), temporarily covering exposed saturated soils if
areas not ready for final backfill, the use of personal protective equipment, mitigation measures such
as venting, and limiting worker entry into trenches and other subsurface work areas as much as is
feasible.

PART 6. SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.

19 | P a g e

5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment
activities, list activities for management of such contact

1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening
levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk-based screening
levels will not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers
encounter contaminated indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐Yes
☒ No ☐ Unknown
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list activities for management of such contact:

Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☒Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☒ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately If submitted
separately provide date:

VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer
If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:

In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage
unknown potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities,
it is not uncommon that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department,
Based on the contaminant levels at the site, exposure to vapors is likely during construction
and, as a result, safety and mitigation measures will be implemented during construction. For
new improvements and construction, a protective VIMS will be installed at the site. Design of
the VIMS will be provided separately.
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM – Please fill out the information below.

PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below.

CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials

20 | P a g e

and/or other officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential
source(s) of contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this EMP.

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known
site impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling
plan will be prepared based on the EMP requirements and site-specific factors.
Samples will generally be collected to document the location of the potential
impacts.

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver)
EPA Method 6020 and EPA Method 7471
☒ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) by EPA Method 8081

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.) Please note, if field observations indicate the need for
additional analyses, they should be conducted, even if not listed here.
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199

Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following
commonly encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.

Underground Storage Tanks:
If a UST is encountered, the environmental professional will be consulted to determine the
appropriate course of action. In addition, the Brownfield Program Project Manager will be
informed. The UST will be removed, disposed and the area in the vicinity of the UST assessed
for evidence of a release. The sampling protocol will follow DEQ UST Section guidance;
however, we anticipate the analysis of soil samples would be for VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA metals
and Cr (VI) to allow for risk-based decision making.

Sub-Grade Feature/Pit:
If a sub-grade feature/pit is encountered, the environmental professional will be consulted to
determine the appropriate course of action. In addition, the Brownfield Program Project
Manager will be informed of the discovery. The feature/pit will be assessed to determine if
environmental assessment or cleanup is warranted.

21 | P a g e

Buried Waste Material:
In the event buried waste is encountered, the environmental professional will be consulted to
determine the appropriate course of action. In addition, the Brownfield Program Project
Manager will be informed of the discovery. The nature of the waste will be evaluated to
determine if environmental assessment or cleanup is warranted.

Re-Use of Impacted Soils On-Site:
Impacted soil may be reused onsite as backfill in accordance with the section above regarding
impacted onsite soils management.

If unknown, impacted soil is identified on-site, management on-site can be considered
after the project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item
11, for Brownfields Project Manager approval prior to final placement on-site.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or
scenarios as needed below:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be due by
January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of this EMP (as
agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as physical
redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final Redevelopment Summary
Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of redevelopment. Based on the estimated
construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary Report is anticipated to be submitted on
January 31, 2022

The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment-related activities
since the last report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory
analysis and ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials
suspected or confirmed to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for
example, concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies
of all legally required manifests shall be included).

☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed,
Redevelopment Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement.

POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
22 | P a g e
Brownfields Project Number: 13022-09-92
Brownfields Project Name: W Cabarrus St
Prospective Developer: KL Platform, LLC Date:
Printed Name/Title/Company: Allen McCollum, Senior Development Manager, Kane Realty Corp
Consultant: Aptus Management, PLLC Date:
Printed Name/Title/Company: John Gallagher, PE, President, Aptus
Brownfields Project Manager: Hayley Irick Date:
APPROVAL SIGNATURES
4/8/21
4/9/2021

23 | P a g e

APPENDIX A - SITE LOCATION MAPS & FIGURES
Figure 1 Site Location Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
2013
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Clancy & Theys Site
600 West Cabarrus St
Raleigh, NC 27603
Aptus Management LLC
TP, Raleigh West, 2013, 7.5-minute
NE, Raleigh East, 2013, 7.5-minute
6232078 4 6
NAD GRID (NAD83 2011)
GRAPHIC SCALE02550 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
CLIENT
REVISIONS
PROJECT NO.KAN-17030
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE 01. 05. 2021
N0.DATE
1
X:\Projects\KAN\KAN-17030\Land\Master - Construction\Current Drawings\KAN17030 - SPR - XC1.dwg, 1/5/2021 10:49:49 AM, Vasil, LindaWEST CABARRUS STREETSITE PERMIT REVIEWRALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINASHEET
PLAN INFORMATION
KANE REALTY CORPORATION
4321 LASSITER AT NORTH HILLS AVE SUITE 250
RALEIGH, NC 27609
REVISION DESCRIPTION
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
www.mcadamsco.com
One Glenwood Avenue
phone [phone]fax [phone]license number: C-0293, C-187
Raleigh, NC 27603Suite 201
FINAL DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY NOTE:
C1.00EXISTINGCONDITIONS
Figure 2
FIGURE 3
Impacted Soil at Storm Drainages Basemap Source: McAdams Company Site Permit Review C6.02
APTUS Management, PLLC
Environmental Management Solutions
West Cabarrus Street Redevelopment Project
Raleigh, North Carolina
NCBF# 13022-09-92
3 Samples>100 ppm 6 Samples avg 1400 ppm
2 Samples – No Hits
No Sample Data. But
12/20/19 Geotechnical
Report Indicates Chemical/Petroleum Odors from Surface to 22/ bls.
2 Samples<20 ppm
2 Samples avg 450 ppm
?
DTW: 4’
DTW: 9’
DTW: 8’
DTW: 7’
Figure 4
CLIENT
REVISIONS
PROJECT NO.KAN-17030
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE 01. 05. 2021
N0.DATE
1
X:\Projects\KAN\KAN-17030\Land\Master - Construction\Current Drawings\KAN17030 - SPR- S3.dwg, 1/5/2021 12:14:17 PM, Vasil, LindaWEST CABARRUS STREETSITE PERMIT REVIEWRALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINASHEET
PLAN INFORMATION
KANE REALTY CORPORATION
4321 LASSITER AT NORTH HILLS AVE SUITE 250
RALEIGH, NC 27609
REVISION DESCRIPTION
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
www.mcadamsco.com
One Glenwood Avenue
phone [phone]fax [phone]license number: C-0293, C-187
Raleigh, NC 27603Suite 201
FINAL DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION C2.02RECOMBINATION PLAN
KAN17030-S3
1"=40'
SITE LEGEND
GRAPHIC SCALE02040 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
LOT 1
4.06 AC.
LOT 2
1.64 AC.
EX. LOT 3
0.21 AC.
CLIENT
REVISIONS
PROJECT NO.KAN-17030
FILENAME
CHECKED BY
DRAWN BY
SCALE
DATE 09. 30. 2019
N0.DATE
1 01.02.2020 REVISED PER CITY OF RALEIGH COMMENTS
X:\Projects\KAN\KAN-17030\Land\Master - Construction\Current Drawings\KAN17030 - ASR - G1.dwg, 1/13/2020 4:58:18 PM, Beard, JustinThe John R. McAdams Company, Inc.2905 Meridian ParkwayDurham, NC 27713
phone [phone]fax [phone]license number: C-0293
WEST CABARRUS STREETADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLANRALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINASHEET
PLAN INFORMATION
KANE REALTY CORPORATION
4321 LASSITER AT NORTH HILLS AVE SUITE 250
RALEIGH, NC 27609
PRELIMINARY DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
[e-mail]: Brian Purdy, RLA
KAN17030-G1
LJV
JLB
1"=40'
C3.00GRADING & STORMDRAINAGE PLAN
GRADING LEGEND
GRAPHIC SCALE02040 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
EXISTINGW. CABARRUS ST(EX. 60' PUBLIC R/W)
EXISTINGS. WEST STREET
(PROPOSED 73' PUBLIC R/W)
EXISTINGDUPONT CIRCLE
(PROPOSED 73' PUBLIC R/W)
EXISTINGWEST CABARRUS STREET
(PROPOSED 64' PUBLIC R/W)
EXISTINGDUPONT CIRCLE
(EX.44' PUBLIC R/W)
BUILDING
BUILDING
BUILDING
PARKING DECK
1ST LEVEL FFE=290.50
FFE=291.00
1ST LEVEL FFE=290.50
FFE=291.00
SEE SHEET C0.00 FOR ALL PROJECT, SITE,GRADING, STORM DRAINAGE AND UTILITYNOTES
2ND LEVEL FFE=305.50
2ND LEVEL FFE=305.50
FFE= 290.00 FFE=290.00
FFE= 290.00
FFE=291.00
BOX CULVERT
X:\Projects\KAN\KAN-17030\Land\Master - Construction\Current Drawings\KAN17030 - ASR - P1.dwg, 1/13/2020 5:05:44 PM, Beard, JustinPLAN AND PROFILECLIENTREVISIONS
N0.DATE PROJECT NO.KAN-17030
FILENAME
CHECKED BY ARP
DRAWN BY JRB
SCALE 1"=40'/1"=4'
DATE
WEST CABARRUS STREETADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
www.mcadamsco.com
phone [phone]fax [phone]license number: C-0293, C-187
One Glenwood AvenueSuite 201Raleigh, NC 27603
PLAN INFORMATION
FINAL DRAWING - NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
KANE REALTY CORPORATION
4321 LASSITER AT NORTH HILLS AVE SUITE 250
RALEIGH, NC 27609
EXISTINGWEST CABARRUS STREET
(PROPOSED 64' PUBLIC R/W)
BOX CULVERT
SEE COVER SHEET FOR SITE DATA TABLE. SEESHEET C-2 FOR SITE, GRADING, STORMDRAINAGE, RETAINING WALL, UTILITY ANDLANDSCAPE NOTES
GRAPHIC SCALE02040 80
1 inch = 40 ft.
C5.00BOX CULVERT, STA. 10+00 THRU STA. 19+75
KAN17030 - ASR - P1
02.01.2020
APPENDIX B - CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
Early Site - 5/3/21
Pad Ready, Parking Deck Construction - 11/8/21
Parking Deck Complete - 1/10/23
Parking Deck Turnover - 6/20/23
Residential Phase 1 Complete - 8/8/23
Residential Phase 2 Complete - 10/9/23
Project Complete - 11/21/23
APPENDIX C – BROWNFIELDS AGREEMENT
APPENDIX D – REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
https://www.dropbox.com/s/gokyopnsjhammnx/2021-01-05%20KAN17030%
20Combined%201st%20SPR%20Set.pdf?dl=0