24050_Vernon Packaging_EMP_20210630_Signed

1
EMP Version 2, June 2018
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.

The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory-compliant
decision-making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.

Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development-related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project,
and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be
cause for a reopener

So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.

☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.

☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.

2
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:

☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.

☐ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.

☒ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.

☐ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
on site after construction grading.

☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).

☐ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.

☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☐ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.

☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.

☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.

☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.

☐ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.

☒ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.

3
EMP Version 2, June 2018
GENERAL INFORMATION

Date: 4/5/2021 Revision Date (if applicable): 6/30/2021

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Vernon Packaging

Brownfields Project Number: 24050-20-034

Brownfields Property Address: 848, 850 and 860 N. Trade Street, Winston-Salem, NC

Brownfields Property Area (acres): 4.03 acres
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.

COMMUNICATIONS

A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.

Prospective Developer (PD): CCC Trade Street LLC
Contact Person: D. Porter Jones
Phone Numbers: Office: n/a Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Contractor for PD: Harold K. Jordan & Co., Inc.
Contact Person: Kris Swedberg
Phone Numbers: Office: 919-303-3652 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Environmental Consultant: Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Contact Person: Mark I. Miller, P.G. / Senior Geologist
Phone Numbers: Office: 336-854-8135 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Brownfields Program Project Manager: Peter Doorn
Phone Numbers: Office: 919-707-8200 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,

4
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
n/a

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:

On‐site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior ☒

Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior ☒

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours ☒

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours ☒

Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior ☒

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days ☒

REDEVELOPMENT PLANS

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☒Residential ☐Recreational ☐Institutional ☐Commercial ☐Office ☐Retail ☐Industrial
☐Other specify:
Multi-family apartments are planned for the site.

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth‐moving activities
at the site:
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
☐ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
☒ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors

3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
Prospective developer intends to construct multi-family apartments on the site. Refer to

5
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Attachment A, Conceptual Development Plan.

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.

5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.

6) Which category of risk‐based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
☒ Residential ☐ Non‐Residential or Industrial/Commercial

7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 6/1/2021

b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
Demolition Phase: June 1, 2021 through July 1, 2021
Earthwork Phase: July 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021
Construction Phase: January 1, 2022 through October 2022.

c) Additional phases planned? ☐ Yes ☐ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: n/a
Planned Activity:
n/a

Start Date: n/a
Planned Activity:
n/a

Start Date: n/a
Planned Activity:
n/a

d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 10/1/2022

6
EMP Version 2, June 2018

CONTAMINATED MEDIA

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil:……………………………………….……………. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater:.……………………….……..……. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water:.……………...……..…………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment:.……………...……..…………………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor:…..…………...……..…………………. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 6. Sub‐Slab Soil Vapor:……...……..…………….. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air:...……..…………………………………. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.

PART 1. Soil – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.

1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
Previous Phase I Environmental Site Assessment activities did not identify obvious on-site
sources of contamination. Potential off-site, up-gradient sources include a gas station and
historical manufacturing activities. Three drycleaners were identified north and cross-gradient to
down-gradient relative to the site. One soil sample collected during the Brownfields
Investigation contained the VOC 1,2-dibromoethane and the RCRA metal selenium at
concentrations exceeding their respective IHSB Protection of Groundwater PSRGs but below
their respective IHSB Residential Health-Based PSRGs. The same soil sample contained the RCRA
metal arsenic at a concentration exceeding its IHSB Residential Health-Based PSRG. Two
groundwater samples contained the RCRA metal chromium at concentrations exceeding its 15A
NCAC 2L Groundwater Quality Standard. However, unknown or unidentified areas of localized
soil impacts may have escaped detection.

2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Impacted soils were encountered at a depth of approximately 7 feet below ground surface.

3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
Approximately 187,308 square feet (4.3 acres)

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
Approximately 9.5 feet

7
EMP Version 2, June 2018
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
See Attachment B, Grading Plan

6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
None. One soil sample collected during the Brownfields Investigation at a depth of
approximately 7 feet below ground surface contained the VOC 1,2-dibromoethane and the RCRA
metal selenium at concentrations exceeding their respective IHSB Protection of Groundwater
PSRGs but below their respective IHSB Residential Health-Based PSRGs. The same soil sample
contained the RCRA metal arsenic at a concentration exceeding its IHSB Residential Health-Based
PSRG. Grading plans indicate that soils in this area will not be excavated but that the area will
instead receive 2 to 4 feet of fill.

7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
None

Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31‐261.35?....................................... ☐Yes ☒No
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained‐Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained‐In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes ☐ No

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED‐OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED‐IN POLICY THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes ☒ No
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
☐ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.

8
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ If no, explain rationale:
The Brownfields Investigation did not identify on-site VOC or SVOC contaminants
at concentrations exceeding their respective IHSB Residential Health-Based
PSRGs. Detections of arsenic and the method detection limit for hexavalent
chromium exceeded their respective IHSB Residential PSRGs but are believed to
be naturally occurring. In addition, the concentrations of RCRA metal detected
above the analytical method’s reporting limits were less than the Rule of 20 (e.g.,
less than 20 times total analytical results for an individual hazardous constituent
on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory TCLP standard.

d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
☒ Preliminary Health‐Based Residential SRGs
☐ Preliminary Health‐Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
☐ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
☐ Site‐specific risk‐based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Click or tap here to enter text.

Additional comments:
Click or tap here to enter text.

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
☐ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known

9
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☒
☒ Describe cap or fill:
Documented impacted soils will be covered with impervious surfaces (asphalt pavement,
sidewalks, access roads, buildings, etc.) or a minimum of 2 feet of demonstrably clean fill
during redevelopment.

☐ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re‐recorded if
actions are Post‐Recordation).
☐ GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
☒ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:

4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
☒ Yes, describe the method will include:
The grading contractor will take into account conditions such as wind speed, wind direction,
and moisture content of soil during grading and stockpiling activities to minimize dust
generation. The soil moisture content will be maintained with a water truck using water
from an on-site municipal source.

☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Field Screening of site soil
☒ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
During soil disturbance at the site, the workers or contractors will observe soils for
evidence of potential impacted soil. Evidence of potential impacted soil includes a distinct
unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concern (i.e.
chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be noted during site work, the contractor
will contact the environmental consultant to observe the suspect condition. If the
environmental consultant confirms that the material may be impacted, then the
procedures below will be implemented. In addition, the environmental consultant will
contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within 48 hours to advise that person of the
condition.
In the event that potentially impacted soils are encountered during construction, an environmental
professional will visit the site to assess the conditions, screen the soils with a photoionization detector
(PID), and analyze the soil as described below. Based on the analytical results soil will be managed as
described below.

10
EMP Version 2, June 2018

☐ No, explain rationale:

Soil Sample Collection
☐ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in‐situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ No, explain rationale:
Collection of additional soil samples is not anticipated based on results of previous site
assessment activities. If previously unknown soil impact is encountered during grading
and/or installation or removal of utilities, excavation will proceed only as far as needed to
allow grading and/or construction of the utility to continue and/or only as far as needed
to allow alternate corrective measure described below.

Suspect impacted soil excavated during grading and/or utility line installation or removal
will be stockpiled and covered in a secure area to allow construction to progress. Suspect
impacted soil will be underlain by and covered with minimum 10-mil plastic sheeting. At
least one representative soil sample (no less than 3 aliquot soil samples) at a sample ratio
of 1 soil sample per every approximately 1,000 cubic yards of soil will be collected for
analysis of total VOCs, SVOCs and RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium. If the soil
sample laboratory analytical results indicate that the soil could potentially exceed toxicity
characteristic hazardous waste criteria, then the soil will also be analyzed by TCLP for
those compounds that could exceed the toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria.

Impacted soils will be managed in the manner described below based upon the laboratory
analyses:

i. If no organic compounds are detected in a sample (other than those that are
attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts), metals are below the Protection of
Groundwater or Residential PSRG (whichever is lower for the detected compounds)
and are consistent with the site-specific background levels, and detected analytical
concentrations do not exceed a cumulative risk exceedance using the DEQ provided
risk calculator, then the soil will be deemed suitable for use as on-site fill or as off-site
fill. The proposed location(s) for off-site placement of soil (other than a permitted
facility) along with the receiving facility’s written approval for acceptance of the soil
will be provided to DEQ for approval prior to taking the soil off-site.
ii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed the DEQ IHSB
Residential PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory
artifacts or which are consistent with site‐specific background levels for metals), the
TCLP concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, and detected analytical
concentrations for not exceed a cumulative risk exceedance using the DEQ provided
risk calculator, then the soil may be used on‐site as fill without conditions.

11
EMP Version 2, June 2018
iii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the DEQ IHSB Residential
PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which
are consistent with background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations are
below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil, with DEQ written approval, may be used
on‐site as fill below an impervious surface, or at least 2 ft of documented compacted
clean soil. If the impacted soil with concentrations above Residential PSRGs is moved
to an on‐site location, its location and depth will be documented, its location will be
provided to DEQ, and the plat will be updated with the on‐site location.
iv. Impacted soil may be transported to a permitted facility such as a landfill or permitted
petroleum impacted soil landfarm provided that the soil is accepted at the disposal
facility. If soil is transported to a permitted facility, the permitted facility’s approval
(e.g., approved waste profile, waste manifests, weight tickets, email approval, etc.) to
dispose of soil from the Site will be included with the final redevelopment report. In
the unlikely event that the sample data indicates concentrations above TCLP
hazardous waste criteria, then the soil must be transported off‐Site to a permitted
disposal facility that can accept or treat hazardous waste.

*Please note that should the PD elect to transport export soil to a permitted facility or to a
DEQ Brownfields pre‐approved receiving facility, soil will be direct loaded onto trucks for
transport off‐site.

If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Methods 6010D and 7471B

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Hexavalent Chromium using Method 3060A/7196A

☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:
Click or tap here to enter text.

12
EMP Version 2, June 2018

☒ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 6010/7470

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Hexavalent Chromium using Method 3060A/7196A

Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, a work plan for
final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
A workplan for final grade sampling will be submitted under separate cover

☐ If final grade sampling was NOT selected please explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Part 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL

NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner.”

Requirements for importing fill:

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?

13
EMP Version 2, June 2018
At this time it appears that approximately 1,000 to 3,000 cubic yards of soil may be imported to
the site as part of the construction activities. Should fill materials be required to support
construction activities the fill soils will be obtained from a local quarry permitted by the North
Carolina Mining Inventory Program.

3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range
of depths, please list the range.)
Fill soils, if required, would likely be placed at depths of less than approximately 9.5 feet.

4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
If necessary, fill materials will be obtained from a local quarry permitted by the North Carolina
Mining Inventory Program.

5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use at the Brownfields property.
If necessary, fill materials will be obtained from a local quarry permitted by the North Carolina
Mining Inventory Program. For every 1,000 yards of soil, one soil sample collected from the area
of the quarry likely to supply the fill will be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA 8 Metals and
hexavalent chromium using the analytical methods described previously. A grab sample will be
used for the VOC analysis and a composite of three grab samples will be used for the SVOC and
metals analysis. The analytical data will be submitted to the NCDEQ for approval prior to
importing soil onto the site.

6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 6010/7470

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Hexavalent Chromium using Method 3060A/7196A

7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in-situ
borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought

14
EMP Version 2, June 2018
onto the Brownfields Property.
A workplan for import soil sampling will be provided under separate cover. DEQ approval of the
sampling plan and analytical results will be obtained prior to transporting import soil to the
Brownfields Property.

Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.

1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.
The current building plans indicate that up to approximately 500 cubic yards of excess soils may
be exported from the property. The areas of cut and fill proposed for the property are illustrated
on the Grading Plan in Attachment B. Prior to transporting soil off-site to other than a Subtitle D
landfill, a sampling plan will be developed and submitted to DEQ Brownfields for review and
approval. Should soil export be required to support construction activities, the soils will be
exported to a local Subtitle D landfill for use as daily cover. In the event the soils do not qualify
for use as landfill daily cover, due to the presence of intermixed organic materials such as grass
and shrubbery, the soils may be disposed as waste at the Subtitle D Landfill. Soils exported to
any location other than a Subtitle D landfill will be sampled and approved for export in
accordance with a workplan approved by the NCDEQ Brownfields Program.

2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
☒ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
☒ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting Landfill;
☐ Landfarm or other treatment facility
☒ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property – determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and that a record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.

15
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☒ Use as Beneficial Fill off-site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.

3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).
Soils exported to any location other than a Subtitle D landfill will be sampled and approved for
export in accordance with a workplan approved by the NCDEQ Brownfields Program

Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES

☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)

☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original
depth from which it was excavated.

☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ If no, include rationale here:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Soil and groundwater data collected during the Brownfields Assessment did not indicate that residual
contaminants are present in site soils at concentrations exceeding their respective Health-Based
Residential PSRGs. However, should impacted soils be encountered in utility trenches, the procedures
described above in Managing On-site Soils will be implemented. The analytical results will be
compared to the respective Health-Based Residential PSRGs and NCDEQ vapor intrusion screening
levels, and the utility trench will be evaluated as a preferential pathway for soil vapor migration.

PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below.

1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
Approximately 40-45 feet below ground surface

2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☐onsite ☐offsite ☐both or ☐unknown

16
EMP Version 2, June 2018
sources? Describe source(s):
On-site sources of potential groundwater contamination have not been identified

3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
Towards the northwest

4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
☐Yes ☒No
If yes, describe these activities:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered
during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent
management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or
sampling procedures).
If contaminated groundwater is encountered during the construction activities in such a way
that it impedes progress, it will be containerized for characterization and possible off-site
disposal.

5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☒Yes ☐No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes ☒No

6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
☒ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program’s intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
☐ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
☐ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
☒ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.

7) Please provide additional details as needed:

Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.

Click or tap here to enter text.

17
EMP Version 2, June 2018
PART 3. SURFACE WATER -Please fill out the information below.
1) Is surface water present at the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes ☒ No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run‐off, stormwater impacts):
Excavations will be protected from stormwater runoff by utilizing berms and drainage trenches.

PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below.

1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No

2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☐ No

3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No

4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.

5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
In the event that potentially impacted sediments are encountered, an environmental professional
will assess the condition, discuss options with the Brownfields Program, and sample the materials
in accordance with Brownfields Program guidance.

PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below.

1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
Groundwater:.….☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
Groundwater:…..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown

18
EMP Version 2, June 2018
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?

4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities
(trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management
of such contact:
Based on the findings of the Brownfields Assessment, it does not appear likely that contaminated
soil vapor would be encountered during redevelopment activities. If potentially VOC-impacted
soil is encountered during the construction process, an environmental professional will assess
the condition and screen the impacted soil with a PID and collect soil samples and soil vapor
samples as needed to assess whether additional sampling or protections are warranted. Soil
samples collected to characterize the soil conditions will also be interpreted for soil vapor using
the NCDEQ Risk Calculator for short term exposures to assess whether additional sampling or
protections are warranted. If necessary, additional protections could include increased
ventilation or the use of vapor-suppressing liquids.

PART 6. SUB‐SLAB SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.
1) Are sub‐slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) If data indicate that sub‐slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map
showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub‐slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☐0‐6 inches ☐Other, please
describe:
n/a

4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub‐slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
Based on the findings of the Brownfields Assessment, it does not appear likely that contaminated
soil vapor would be encountered during redevelopment activities. If potentially VOC-impacted
Chloroform was detected at 10 feet below ground surface in three of eight soil vapor samples
collected at the site, at concentrations exceeding the current IHSB Residential Vapor Intrusion
Screening Level (VISLs). Other VOCs were detected in the samples at concentrations below the IHSB
Residential VISLs. The NCDEQ Risk Calculator indicated that the soil vapor concentrations do not
exceed the Carcinogenic or Hazard Index Risk values.

19
EMP Version 2, June 2018
soil is encountered during the construction process, an environmental professional will assess
the condition and screen the impacted soil with a PID, and collect soil samples and soil vapor
samples as needed to assess whether additional sampling or protections are warranted. Soil
samples collected to characterize the soil conditions will also be interpreted for soil vapor using
the NCDEQ Risk Calculator for short term exposures to assess whether additional sampling or
protections are warranted. If necessary, additional protections could include increased
ventilation or the use of vapor-suppressing liquids.

PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below.

1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk‐based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:

VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM – Please fill out the information below.
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☐ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
n/a

VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer

Existing buildings will be demolished as part of the site recevelopment process. In addition, based on
the findings of the Brownfields Assessment, it does not appear likely that contaminated indoor air
would be encountered during redevelopment activities. If potentially contaminated indoor air is
encountered, Terracon will dispatch an indoor air professional to assess the condition and determine
what types of samples (soil, soil vapor, sub-slab soil vapor, indoor air), if any, need to be collected.
Worker protections could include the installation of engineering controls during construction to
recirculate outdoor air into the building. Depending on the preliminary findings, Terracon will discuss
options with the Brownfields Program, and potential response options in accordance with Brownfields
Program guidance

20
EMP Version 2, June 2018
If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
A vapor mitigation plan is not warranted for the site based on the presence of J-value levels of
VOCs in soil and groundwater samples, low concentrations of VOCs in soil vapor samples, and the
NCDEQ Risk Calculator findings that VOC concentrations in environmental media at the site do
not exceed Carcinogenic or Hazard Index risk values.

CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials

In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site-specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Hexavalent Chromium using Method 3060A/7196A

Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
Click or tap here to enter text.

21
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Underground Storage Tanks:
If a UST is encountered, construction activities will cease in the immediate area until an
environmental professional can visit the site. The environmental professional will assess the
situation and report to the DEQ within 48 hours of discovery. The tank will be inspected to
determine if any product remains in the tank. The contents of the tank will be evaluated, analyzed,
and disposed of at a licensed off-site facility in accordance with regulatory requirements and DEQ
approval. Unless an alternative approach is approved by DEQ, the tank will be removed in
accordance with applicable UST regulations. Following appropriate health and safety protocols
surrounding soil and soil at the base of the tank will be screened with a photoionization detector
(PID) and flame ionization detector (FID), the breathing zone will be monitored using a PID/FID, and
confirmatory soil sampling and/or remedial activities will be conducted to the satisfaction of DEQ.
Sampling locations will be selected as outlined in the most recent version of Site Checks, Tank
Closure and initial Response and Abatement for UST Releases (UST Section, DEQ, Division of Waste
Management). Samples will be analyzed as referenced above, and impacted soil associated with
the UST will be managed in accordance with the Managing On-Site Soil section of this EMP.
Sub-Grade Feature/Pit:
If a sub-grade feature or pit is encountered that displays evidence of environmental impacts such as
unusual odors or staining, construction activities will cease in the immediate area until an
environmental professional can visit the site. The environmental professional will assess the feature
and screen soils for the potential presence of volatile organic constituents using a PID. If it appears
that the sub-grade feature or pit contains impacted soils, a minimum volume of impacted soils
necessary to support construction will be removed and stockpiled on-site pending characterization.
Characterization will consist of analyzing one grab sample per 100 tons of material for VOCs, SVOCs,
RCRA 8 metals and hexavalent chromium in accordance with Part 1.A above and may include TCLP
analyses if deemed necessary for disposal purposes. The sub-grade feature or pit will then be
removed or backfilled in accordance with construction specifications. Confirmation sampling will be
conducted at representative locations in the base and sidewalls of the excavation for the
parameters noted above. The environmental professional will notify the Brownfields Project
Manager within 48 hours of discovery of the conditions encountered and corrective actions taken.
Buried Waste Material:
If buried waste materials are encountered, construction activities will cease in the immediate area
until an environmental professional can visit the site. The environmental professional will assess
the buried materials and screen soils for the potential presence of volatile organic constituents
using a PID, and methane using a flame-ionization detector (FID). The buried waste will be removed
to the extent practicable, and if it appears that impacted soils are present, a minimum volume of
impacted soils necessary to support construction will be removed and stockpiled on-site pending
characterization. Characterization will consist of analyzing one grab sample per 100 tons of material
for VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA 8 metals and hexavalent chromium in accordance with Part 1.A above, and
may include TCLP analyses if deemed necessary for disposal purposes. Confirmation sampling will
be conducted at representative locations in the base and sidewalls of the excavation for the
parameters noted above. The environmental professional will notify the Brownfields Project
22
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Manager within 48 hours of discovery and will report on the conditions encountered and actions
taken. If waste materials cannot be fully excavated their continued presence will need to be
evaluated from both a geotechnical perspective and for methane and/or soil vapor generating
potential. The environmental professional will contact the Brownfields Project Manager for
guidance.
Re-Use of Impacted Soils On-Site:
Please refer to Part 1.A above.
If unknown, impacted soil is identified on-site, management on-site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on-site.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
Click or tap here to enter text.
POST‐REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
☒Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 5/31/2022
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment-related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1.actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2.soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3.methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4.stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5.removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).
23
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☒Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement.

25
EMP Version 2, June 2018

ATTACHMENT A

CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

DPJ - Artreaux
Winston-Salem, NC
Illustrative Site Plan
This site plan is for illustrative purposes to show the
proposed design intent. The plan is subject to change
based on local jurisdiction review, code requirements,
and final architectural and engineering documents.
North
0’30’
Scale: 1” = 30’
60’
#20-088 | 09.28.2020
WINSTON-SALEM, NC CHARLOTTE, NC www.stimmelpa.com 336.723.1067
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
CIVIL ENGINEERING
L AND PLANNING
stimmel
Parking Deck
Pool
Courtyard
Secondary
CourtyardDog ParkApartments
(5 - Stories)Townhomes(2 - Stories)Lobby/
Leasing
Club
Area Fitness Area
W 8th Street
9th Street Extension 9th Street
NW 10th Street
N Martin Luther King Jr. DriveN Che
r
ry
S
t
ree
t Trade Street NWOak Street

ATTACHMENT B

GRADING PLAN
942.25941.60939.04939.11938.66938.58938.44941.19940.83940.61942.47937.23937.36937.45937.23938.55938.10942.26936.32937.95937.91937.51937.59937.45936.71936.85UPUPUP942.00 TOS942.00 TOS942.00 TOS940.50 TOS940.50 TOS940.50 TOS940.50 TOS940.50 TOS939.50 TOS932.25939.50 TOS939.67 TOS942.00 TOS939.00 TOS939.00 TOS940.58940.08TOSWATERMAINELEC.LEASINGOFFICESMAILROOMCLUBELEV.LOBBYLOUNGEFIRE/SPRINKLERELEV. 1ELEV2FITNESS940.50 TOS938.50939.50ELEVELEV.LOBBYMAINDATAMAINT.POOLEQUIP.STAIR 4VANEVEVCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
C C FDCCCCCFD
STIMMEL ASSOCIATES, P.A.SHEET NO.:SCALE:JOB. NO:SHEET TITLE:DATE:DRAWN:REVISIONS:CLIENT:WINSTON SALEM, NC PROJECT:SEALS:MR. PORTER JONESDPJ RESIDENTIAL, LLC1539 TIPPAH PARK COURTCHARLOTTE, NC 28205(980)[e-mail]20-0889/18/20ARTREAUX APARTMENTS
A DPJ RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 1"=30'0SCALE: 1" = 30' 30306090NorthCUT/ FILL LEGEND:FILL AREAN/FEIGHT THIRTY OAKCONDOMINIUMOWNERSASSOCIATION, INCDB 3429 PG 3305PIN# 6835-19-0758N/FOAK STREETPARTNERS, LLCDB 3384 PG 2346PIN# 6835-19-1868N/FCITY OF WINSTONSALEMDB 1166 PG 263PIN# 6836-10-4266N/FNEW BETHELBAPTIST CHURCHDB 1168 PG 1230PIN# 6836-10-6157N/FNOTRA LAND &BUILDING LLCDB 3342 PG 2500PIN# 6836-10-9054N/FNOTRA LAND &BUILDING LLCDB 3342 PG 2500PIN# 6835-29-0843N/FCHAMBERS FAMILYTRUSTDB 1954 PG 1905PIN# 6835-19-2620N/FTHE LIBERTY GROUP, LLCDB 3361 PG 4098PIN# 6835-19-2536N/FCITY OF WINSTON SALEMDB 1376 PG1742PIN# 6835-19-2417N/FJOSH CONOR & FINN LLCDB 3360 PG 1993PIN# 6835-19-2351N/F9TH STREETPROPERTIES, LLCDB 2963 PG 3712PIN# 6835-19-9308TRADE STREET(50' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY )
OAK STREET(40' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY )TENTH STREET(60' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY)EX-1.0BWCEARTHWORKEXHIBITF10th St WTrade St NWOak St NWW 8th StW 9th StOak St NWN Cherry StMarshall St NSpruce St NN Main StN Liberty StTrade St NWN Chestnut StSITEN Martin Luther King Jr DrNorthVICINITY MAPNINTH STREET(55' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY)CUT AREA
UPUPUP942.00 TOS942.00 TOS942.00 TOS940.50 TOS940.50 TOS940.50 TOS940.50 TOS940.50 TOS939.50 TOS932.25939.50 TOS939.67 TOS942.00 TOS939.00 TOS939.00 TOS940.58940.08TOSWATERMAINELEC.LEASINGOFFICESMAILROOMCLUBELEV.LOBBYLOUNGEFIRE/SPRINKLERELEV. 1ELEV2FITNESS940.50 TOS938.50939.50ELEVELEV.LOBBYMAINDATAMAINT.POOLEQUIP.STAIR 4VANEVEVCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
C C FDCCCCCFD
STIMMEL ASSOCIATES, P.A.SHEET NO.:SCALE:JOB. NO:SHEET TITLE:DATE:DRAWN:REVISIONS:CLIENT:WINSTON SALEM, NC PROJECT:SEALS:MR. PORTER JONESDPJ RESIDENTIAL, LLC1539 TIPPAH PARK COURTCHARLOTTE, NC 28205(980)[e-mail]20-0889/18/20ARTREAUX APARTMENTS
A DPJ RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 1"=30'0SCALE: 1" = 30' 30306090NorthCUT/ FILL LEGEND:N/FEIGHT THIRTY OAKCONDOMINIUMOWNERSASSOCIATION, INCDB 3429 PG 3305PIN# 6835-19-0758N/FOAK STREETPARTNERS, LLCDB 3384 PG 2346PIN# 6835-19-1868N/FCITY OF WINSTONSALEMDB 1166 PG 263PIN# 6836-10-4266N/FNEW BETHELBAPTIST CHURCHDB 1168 PG 1230PIN# 6836-10-6157N/FNOTRA LAND &BUILDING LLCDB 3342 PG 2500PIN# 6836-10-9054N/FNOTRA LAND &BUILDING LLCDB 3342 PG 2500PIN# 6835-29-0843N/FCHAMBERS FAMILYTRUSTDB 1954 PG 1905PIN# 6835-19-2620N/FTHE LIBERTY GROUP, LLCDB 3361 PG 4098PIN# 6835-19-2536N/FCITY OF WINSTON SALEMDB 1376 PG1742PIN# 6835-19-2417N/FJOSH CONOR & FINN LLCDB 3360 PG 1993PIN# 6835-19-2351N/F9TH STREETPROPERTIES, LLCDB 2963 PG 3712PIN# 6835-19-9308TRADE STREET(50' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY )
OAK STREET(40' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY )TENTH STREET(60' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY)EX-1.0BWCEARTHWORKEXHIBITF10th St WTrade St NWOak St NWW 8th StW 9th StOak St NWN Cherry StMarshall St NSpruce St NN Main StN Liberty StTrade St NWN Chestnut StSITEN Martin Luther King Jr DrNorthVICINITY MAPNINTH STREET(55' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY)NumberMinimum Elevation-9.526-6.000-4.000-2.0000.0002.000Maximum Elevation-6.000-4.000-2.0000.0002.0004.000Color6.0008.3754.0006.000CUTFILL