23052_ Southern Steel_EMP Signed 2021.03.04

Environmental Management Plan

Southern Steel
3015 Wilkinson Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina

Brownfields Project No. 23052-19-060
H&H Job No. ANR-007 March 4, 2021
#C-1269 Engineering
#245 Geology

CONTENTS
Completed EMP Template Form

Tables

Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Data
Table 2 Summary of Composite Soil Analytical Data
Table 3 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data

Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site and Sample Location Map
Figure 3 Soil Characterization Sample Location Map
Appendices

Appendix A Site Redevelopment Plan
Appendix B Cut/Fill Analysis

1
EMP Version 2, June 2018
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.

The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory-compliant
decision-making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.

Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development-related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project,
and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be
cause for a reopener

So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.

☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.

☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.
2
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:

☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.

☐ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.

☒ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.

☐ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
on site after construction grading.

☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).

☐ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.

☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☐ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.

☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.

☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.

☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.

☐ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.

☐ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.
3
EMP Version 2, June 2018
COMMUNICATIONS

Date: 3/4/2021 Revision Date (if applicable):

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Southern Steel

Brownfields Project Number: 23052-19-060

Brownfields Property Address: 3015 Wilkinson Boulevard, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina (Figure 1)

Brownfields Property Area (acres): 5.19

Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.:
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.:

A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.

Prospective Developer (PD): Wilkinson Steel Yard, LLC Contact Person: Trent Haston Phone Numbers: Office: 704-334-5477 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Contractor for PD: Roby Commercial Contact Person: Corey Shanks Phone Numbers: Office: 704-334-5477 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC
Contact Person: Bo Cappleman
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-586-0007 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Brownfields Program Project Manager: Carolyn Minnich Phone Numbers: Office: 704-661-0330 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
GENERAL INFORMATION
4
EMP Version 2, June 2018
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
Not Applicable

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:

On-site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior ☒

Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior ☒

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours ☒

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours ☒

Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior ☒

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement
redevelopment activities: (as applicable): ……………………….……………………Within 30 days ☒

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☐ Residential ☐Recreational ☐Institutional ☒Commercial ☒Office ☒Retail ☒Industrial
☐ Other specify:
Warehousing, brewery or food production facility, and restaurant

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth-moving activities
at the site:
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
☒ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
☐ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors

3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
5
EMP Version 2, June 2018

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
☐ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.
5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.
6) Which category of risk-based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
☒ Residential ☐ Non-Residential or Industrial/Commercial
7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 3/15/2021

b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):

c) Additional phases planned? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: TBD
Planned Activity:

Start Date:
Planned Activity:

The first phase of site redevelopment is non-residential; however, future redevelopment in
the mid- to long term could include high-density residential.
Redevelopment activities are expected to begin in March 2021 and be completed in January
2022. Activities include grading (March/April 2021), foundation construction (May/June
2021), building construction (July-November 2021), paving (December 2021), and
landscaping (January 2022).
The PD proposes to construct three 20,077-square foot warehouse buildings that will be used for
predominantly warehousing/distribution and office purposes. Surrounding grounds will consist
of predominantly asphalt parking areas/driveways and concrete loading areas/walkways. A Site
Plan showing the proposed redevelopment is included as Appendix A.
6
EMP Version 2, June 2018
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
PART 1. Soil – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
Start Date:
Planned Activity:

d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: TBD

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil:……………………………………….……………. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater:.……………………….……..……. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water:.……………...……..…………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment:.……………...……..…………………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor:…..…………...……..…………………. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 6. Sub-Slab Soil Vapor:……...……..…………….. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air:...……..…………………………………. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.

1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):

A tabular summary of soil analytical data in comparison to the July 2020 North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) is
included as Table 1. Soil sample locations are shown on Figure 2. A brief summary of the results
is provided below.

Chloroform (0.81 mg/kg) was detected at an estimated “j-flag” concentration in sample SS-1 (2-4
ft) above the residential PSRG of 0.34 mg/kg but below the industrial/commercial PSRG of 1.5
mg/kg. Sample SS-1 was collected from the western portion of the Site in the southeastern
portion of proposed Building 1. Chloroform is a common laboratory contaminant; therefore, the
detection may not be representative of site soil conditions.

Several polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were detected at concentrations above the
residential PSRGs in soil sample SS-1A (2-3 ft), which was collected adjacent to sample SS-1 in the
southeastern portion of proposed Building 1.
7
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Hexavalent chromium was detected above the residential PSRG at concentrations ranging from
2.48 mg/kg to 4.01 mg/kg in samples SB-10 (1-3 ft), SB-11 (1-3 ft), SB-13 (1-3 ft), and SB-14 (1-3
ft), which were collected near former steel fabrication areas in the western, central, and eastern
portions of the site.

Arsenic (up to 3.51 mg/kg) was also detected above residential and/or industrial/commercial
PSRGs is samples collected from the western, central, and eastern portions of the site.

Lead was detected in multiple samples collected in the central and western portions of the site
at concentrations above the residential and/or industrial/commercial PSRGs. Lead detections
above the PSRGs ranged from 534 mg/kg in sample SB-2 (1-3 ft) to 1,240 mg/kg in sample SB-3
(1-3 ft). Subsequent waste characterization sampling was performed and indicated
characteristically hazardous levels of lead may be present in an approximate 0.3-acre area to a
depth of at least 4 ft within and adjacent to the west, north, and east of proposed Building 1 in
the western portion of the site. Specifically, lead was detected in leachate from composite
samples B1-A( (13.5 mg/L), B1-B (26 mg/L), Comp-1 (11.4 mg/L), and Comp-3 (5.8 mg/L) at
concentrations above the EPA Maximum Concentration for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedure (TCLP) of 5.0 mg/L. The results of soil characterization sampling are summarized in
Table 2. The approximate area of potential characteristically hazardous lead in soil (referred to
as “Area 1”) is depicted on Figure 3.

Additional metals, including barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, manganese,
mercury, nickel, and selenium, were detected at concentrations below PSRGs.
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
1.0-4.0 feet.

3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
The area of potential soil disturbance is estimated to be approximately 3.22 acres
(approximately144,586 square feet) of the 5.19-acre site. The area of potential disturbance will
consist of the existing gravel/grass-covered area located north of the Norfolk Southern railroad
right-of-way and south of the access road located along the northern site boundary.

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):

5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
Based on conservative estimates of up to 3,000 cubic yards of excavation during grading, up to
Shallow soil disturbance (i.e., up to 1 ft) is currently planned as part of initial grading activities to
remove organic-rich topsoil beneath proposed building foundations. Cut depths in the eastern
portion of the Site range from approximately 1 to 4 ft bgs. Excavation for the installation of new
utilities may include trenching to depths of up to 8 ft bgs. Beneath proposed building
foundations, aggregate piers will be installed to partially weathered rock at depths of
approximately 20 ft bgs.
8
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL

6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:

7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
See answer to Part 1, Section 6 above.

If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).
1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ☐Yes ☒No
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).

☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained-Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained-In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes ☒ No

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED-OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED-IN POLICYTHE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITHDEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☒ Yes ☐ No
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
☐ Ignitability
Excavation of up to approximately 2,000-2,500 cubic yards of impacted soil is anticipated. The
impacted soil is proposed to be used as fill material in areas of proposed parking lots and
driveways. Excavated soils that cannot be re-used as fill material on-site will be transported to a
municipal solid waste landfill under standard manifest protocol or stockpiled for composite
sampling as outlined in Part 1.C. Soil removed from “Area 1” will be stockpiled and treated by
blending/lead-stabilization methods, tested through composite sampling to confirm that the soil
is characteristically non-hazardous, and placed in a designated area on-site. The final on-site
location(s) of soil from “Area 1” will be depicted on the Brownfields Plat. Refer to Part 1.A., Item
4 for further discussion of soil management procedures for “Area 1”.
500 cubic yards of soil removal during installation of aggregate piers, up to 500 cubic yards of soil
excavation during construction of spread footings, and additional soil during utility installation,
approximately 4,000-4,500 cubic yards of soil may be disturbed.
9
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☐ Corrosivity
☐ Reactivity
☐ Toxicity
☒ TCLP results Results of soil characterization sampling indicate that lead is
present at characteristically hazardous levels in an approximate 0.3-acre area

☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)

☐ If no, explain rationale:

d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAYNOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped
in place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed
offsite):
☐ Preliminary Health-Based Residential SRGs
☒ Preliminary Health-Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
☒ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
☐ Site-specific risk-based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.

Additional comments:

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known

☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:

☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☒
as “Area 1” and is depicted on Figure 3.
to a depth of at least 4 ft within and adjacent to the west, north, and east of
proposed Building 1 in the western portion of the site. This area is identified
10
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☒ Describe cap or fill:

☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-recorded if
actions are Post-Recordation).
☒ GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
☐ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:

4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
☒ Yes, describe the method will include:

☐ No, explain rationale:

Field Screening of site soil
☒ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:

☐ No, explain rationale:

Soil Sample Collection
☒ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in-situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
During soil disturbance at the site, the workers or contractors will observe soils for
evidence of potential impacts. Evidence of potentially impacted soil includes a distinct
unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e.
chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be noted during site work, the contractor
will contact the project environmental professional to observe the suspect condition. If
the project environmental professional confirms that the material may be impacted, then
the procedures below will be implemented. In addition, the DEQ Brownfields project
manager will be contacted within 48 hours to advise of the condition.
The grading contractor will consider conditions such as wind speed, wind direction, and
moisture content of soil during soil grading and stockpiling activities to minimize dust
generation. If suspect contaminated soil is encountered during site redevelopment that
requires excavation, particular attention will be paid by contractors to implement dust
control measures as needed based on site and atmospheric conditions (i.e. by controlled
water application, hydro-seeding, and/or mulch, stone, or plastic cover). Potentially
impacted soil will be managed as described below.
Should impacted soil be encountered during redevelopment, the potentially impacted soil
will be placed beneath impervious surfaces (asphalt pavement, sidewalks, buildings, etc.) or
a minimum of 2 ft of demonstrably clean fill.
11
EMP Version 2, June 2018

☒ No, explain rationale:
Collection of additional soil samples other than composite sampling noted above is not
anticipated based on the results of previous site assessment activities. However, if
significant soil impact is encountered in areas not previously assessed, excavation will
proceed only as far as needed to allow grading or other construction-related activity to
continue only as far as needed to allow alternate corrective measures as described below.
Suspect significantly impacted soil excavated during redevelopment activities may be
stockpiled and covered in a secure area to allow construction to progress. Suspect
impacted soil will be stockpiled in accordance with Figure 1, NCBP Diagram for Temporary
Containment of Impacted or Potentially Impacted Soil. At least one representative
sample of the soil will be collected for analysis of total VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA metals, and
hexavalent chromium as outlined in Part 1.C. If the results of analysis of the sample
indicate that the soil could potentially exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous waste
criteria, then the soil will also be analyzed by TCLP for those compounds that could
exceed the toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria. Impacted soil will be handled
in the manner described below based upon the laboratory analyses:
i. If no organic compounds are detected in a sample (other than which are
attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts) and metals are below
industrial/commercial PSRGs or are consistent with site-specific background levels, then
the soil will be deemed suitable for use as on-site fill or as off-site fill. The proposed
location(s) for off-site placement of soil (other than a Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
[MSWLF]) along with the receiving facility’s written approval for acceptance of the soil will
be provided to DEQ for approval prior to taking the soil off-site.
ii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed
industrial/commercial PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory
artifacts or which are consistent with site-specific background levels for metals) and the
TCLP concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil may be used on-
site as fill without conditions.
The PD will perform composite sampling of stockpiled soil generated during grading
activities, aggregate pier installation, and foundation construction in “Area 1”. Soil will be
stockpiled in accordance with Figure 1 – NCBP Diagram for Temporary Containment of
Impacted or Potentially Impacted Soil. Soil excavated from “Area 1” will be segregated
from the remainder of material that will be stockpiled prior to export from the site. Refer
to Part 1.C. for a description of sampling procedures for exported soil.

Sampling procedures for soil excavated from the “Area 1” will outlined in a Hazardous Soil
Removal and Treatment Work Plan, which will be submitted for DEQ Brownfields Program
approval prior to disturbance of “Area 1”.
12
EMP Version 2, June 2018

If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260

☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270

☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): EPA Method 6020/7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199

☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:

☒ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (Check all that apply):

☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
iii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the
industrial/commercial PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or
laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with background levels for metals) and
the TCLP concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil, with
DEQ’s written approval, may be used on-site as fill below an impervious surface, at
least 2 ft of compacted clean soil, or a geotechnical fabric. If the impacted soil with
concentrations above industrial/commercial PSRGs is moved to an on-site location,
its location and depth will be documented and provided to DEQ and the impacted
soil will be placed beneath at least 2 ft of compacted demonstrably clean soil, an
impervious surface, or covered with a geotechnical fabric.
iv. Impacted soil may be transported to a MSWLF provided that the soil is accepted at
the disposal facility. If soil is transported to a permitted facility, the permitted facility’s
written approval to dispose of soil from the site will be included with the final EMP report.
In the unlikely event that the sample data indicates concentrations above TCLP hazardous
waste criteria, then the soil must be transported off-site to a MSWLF that can accept or
treat hazardous waste.
13
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Part 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270

☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): EPA Methods 6020/7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199

Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology. Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, a work plan for
final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.

☐ If final grade sampling was NOT selected please explain rationale:

NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner.”

Requirements for importing fill:

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

Following completion of soil disturbance for any future site development (i.e. after grading
and utility construction), an environmental professional will be contracted to assess the
site for areas that are not covered with demonstrably clean fill soil, building foundations,
sidewalks, asphalt or concrete parking areas, driveways, or other impervious surfaces. If
such areas exist, a Work Plan will be prepared for final grade sampling for DEQ review and
approval. If no such areas exist, documentation will be provided to the DEQ Brownfields
project manager.
14
EMP Version 2, June 2018
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?

3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range
of depths, please list the range.)
0 to 5 feet

4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:

5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use at the Brownfields property.

6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270

☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 6020/7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199

Please see No. 7 below for details outlining the proposed plan to demonstrate import soil meets
acceptable standards applicable to the site. The PD also plans to import limited amounts of
virgin topsoil from a commercial landscape material vendor for use in proposed landscaped
areas. The PD does not plan to collect samples of landscaping materials prior to placement at
the Site. DEQ Brownfields will be notified of the volume of landscaping material needed and the
proposed source of the material prior to placement in proposed landscaping areas.
The source(s) of fill material have not been confirmed. However, the PD intends to use existing
soil data for the site and other local Brownfields properties to identify a DEQ-approved
Brownfields export site. Alternatively, the PD will import fill material from the Vulcan Materials
Company quarry located near Pineville, NC or from the Martin Marietta quarry located on
Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, NC.
Up to approximately 9,000 cubic yards of structural fill is anticipated to be imported to the site. In
addition, limited amounts of virgin topsoil may be imported from a commercial landscape
material vendor for use in proposed landscaped areas.
15
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL
7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in-situ
borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought
onto the Brownfields Property.

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.

1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.

Up to approximately 2,000 cubic yards of export soil is anticipated to be generated during
grading, foundation construction, trenching, and aggregate pier installation. As noted in Part
1.A. Section 4 (Soil Sample Collection), composite sampling of soil stockpiles will be performed.

If stockpiled soil which originated outside of “Area 1” cannot be reused on-site, the soil will be
characterized prior to export from the site. H&H will sample the soil stockpile(s)

The PD will follow the procedures outlined below to demonstrate import soil meets acceptable
standards applicable to the site: -
- If the PD plans to import fill material from Vulcan Materials Company quarry located near
Pineville, NC or from the Martin Marietta quarry located on Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, NC,
no samples of the import material will be collected as adequate analytical data is available in the
DEQ Brownfields database to demonstrate material from these facilities is suitable for use as
structural fill at a Brownfields property.
- If fill soil is obtained from an off-site property that is not a known permitted quarry, soil samples
will be collected for laboratory analyses indicated above at a general rate of one per 1,000 cubic
yards. If the borrow source property has been previously developed, soil samples will be
collected for laboratory analyses indicated above at a general rate of approximately one per 500
cubic yards. Composite soil samples for SVOC, RCRA metals, and hexavalent chromium analysis
will consist of 3-5 sample aliquots, and grab soil samples will be collected for VOC analysis. Fill soil
will be considered suitable for use at the site if it does not contain compound concentrations
above DEQ IHSB industrial/commercial PSRGs and metals concentrations are generally consistent
with the subject property.
16
EMP Version 2, June 2018
at a rate of approximately one sample per 500 cubic yards. Stockpile samples will be collected
for laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, RCRA metals
by EPA Method 6020/7471, and hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199. Sample volume for
SVOCs and metals analysis will be collected as composite samples using a decontaminated
stainless-steel hand auger. The composite samples will consist of five sample aliquots that are
combined to form one sample for laboratory analysis. Each aliquot will be field screened for the
presence of VOCs using a calibrated PID. VOC samples will be collected as grab samples using a
decontaminated stainless-steel hand auger from the general area of the aliquot which exhibits
the highest indication of impact during field screening. The soil collected for VOC analysis shall
be collected from non-homogenized, non-screened soils to reduce volatilization of potential
contaminants.

Following completion of the soil assessment activities and receipt of the analytical data, H&H will
prepare a data summary package for DEQ review. The data summary package will include a
tabular summary of the laboratory analytical results in comparison to the regulatory screening
levels and background metals concentrations, and a copy of the laboratory analytical report.
H&H assumes that the data summary package can be reviewed by DEQ to provide guidance
regarding potential export site selection. Based on analytical results of soil samples collected
from the export soil, the soil will be transported off-site to a suitable location. The PD will notify
DEQ Brownfields of the location receiving the export soil. If not a MSWLF (e.g., another
Brownfields property or a non-Brownfields property), DEQ Brownfields and Solid Waste Section
approval and written approval from the receiving facility will be obtained prior to transporting
the soil off-site.

2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
☒ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
☒ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting Landfill;
☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility
☒ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property – determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and that a record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
☒ Use as Beneficial Fill off-site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.

17
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).

☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)

☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth from which it was excavated.

☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials:

☒

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:

Although not anticipated, in the event that evidence of contaminated soil and/or vapors are
encountered in utility trenches during redevelopment activities (e.g., unusual odors are identified or
workers report lightheadedness or other unusual physical reaction), the trench will be evacuated and
appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be performed to protect workers. If results indicate
further action is warranted in response to vapors to protect workers, appropriate engineering
controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.

The contractor and workers will observe soil for potential impacts during utility installation activities.
Due to the lack of obvious field evidence of lead contamination and the extent of lead-impacted soil
identified during previous assessment of the site, field screening for the presence of lead is not
warranted. However, contractors will be observed by an environmental professional when trenching
within the “Area 1” to ensure that appropriate worker safety measures are implemented. Evidence
of potential significant impacted soil from contaminants such as VOCs and SVOCs includes a distinct
unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e., chemicals,
tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be noted during utility work, the contractor will contact the
project environmental professional to observe the suspect condition and screen the soil using a
photo-ionization detector (PID) or other similar vapor field screening instrument. If the project
environmental professional confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures
outlined Managing On-Site Soil above (Part 1.A.) will be implemented.
The environmental professional will contact DEQ Brownfields to obtain DEQ Brownfields and
DEQ Solid Waste approval prior to exporting soil to a non-MSWLF.
If no, include rationale here:
VOCs are not considered site-specific contaminants of concern. Therefore, evaluation of soil
vapor is not warranted during site redevelopment.
18
EMP Version 2, June 2018
PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below.

1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?

2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☒onsite ☐offsite ☐both or ☐unknown
sources? Describe source(s):

3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
Groundwater flow at the site is expected to mimic topography and flow toward the southwest.
4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒No
If yes, describe these activities:

Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or sampling procedures).

Although not anticipated at this time, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken if
groundwater gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted (based
on previous sampling data, strong odor, unnatural color, sheen, etc.) during construction
Groundwater is not anticipated to be encountered during the proposed redevelopment of the
site. See below for groundwater management procedures in the unlikely event that
groundwater is encountered.
A tabular summary of historical groundwater analytical data in comparison to the North Carolina
Administrative Code (NCAC) 2L Groundwater Standards (2L Standards) is included as Table 3, and
groundwater sample locations are shown on Figure 2. A summary is provided below.

Several metals, including arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, copper, cobalt, lead,
manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium and/or silver, were detected in groundwater samples
collected at the site. In 2010, arsenic, barium, chromium, lead, and/or mercury were detected at
concentrations above the 2L Standards in samples BH-8 and BH-12, which were collected near a
former septic tank and UST. Based on groundwater data for sample TMW-1, which was collected
in 2019 near former samples BH-8 and BH-12, the 2010 metals detections in groundwater may
be associated with high turbidity. Cobalt and manganese were detected at concentrations above
the regional background concentration and 2L Standard or Interim Maximum Allowable
Concentration (IMAC) in samples TMW-1, TMW-2, and TMW-3, which were collected in the
western portion of the site in March 2019. Chromium was detected slightly above the 2L
Standard in background sample TMW-4, which was collected in the northeastern (upgradient)
portion of the site.
Depth to groundwater was measured at approximately 5.5 to 10 ft bgs in temporary monitoring
wells installed at the site.
In addition, the environmental professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within
48 hours to advise that person of the condition.
19
EMP Version 2, June 2018
PART 3. SURFACE WATER -Please fill out the information below.

5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☐Yes ☒No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes ☐No

6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
☐ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program’s intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
☐ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
☐ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
☒ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.

7) Please provide additional details as needed:

Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.

1) Is surface water present at the property? ☒ Yes ☐ No
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes ☒ No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
activities. The contractor will contact the environmental professional to observe the area(s)
suspected to be impacted. The accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the
extent time for dissipation does not disrupt the construction schedule. Should the time needed
for natural dissipation of accumulated water be deemed inadequate, the water will be tested
and disposed off-site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not
impacted above DEQ surface water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and
State regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control.
20
EMP Version 2, June 2018
PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below.
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below.

1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ☒ Yes ☐ No

2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No

3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No

4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.

5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):

1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
Groundwater:.….☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
Groundwater:…..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
A stream is present in the southwestern portion of the site and within the Norfolk Southern
railroad right-of-way. No disturbance of the stream or associated sediment is anticipated as part
of site redevelopment activities.
A stream is present in the southwestern portion of the site and within the Norfolk Southern
railroad right-of-way. No disturbance of the stream is anticipated as part of site redevelopment
activities.

If surface water run-off gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted
during construction activities (based on previous sampling data, strong odor, unnatural color,
sheen, etc.), appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken. The accumulated water
will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent time for dissipation does not disrupt the
construction schedule. Should the time needed for natural dissipation of accumulated water be
deemed inadequate, the water will be tested and disposed off-site (if impacted), or tested and
discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ surface water standards) in
accordance with applicable municipal and State regulations for erosion control and construction
stormwater control.
21
EMP Version 2, June 2018
PART 6. SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.
PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below.
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?
N/A

4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities
(trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management
of such contact:

1) Are sub-slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) If data indicate that sub-slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map
showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub-slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☐0-6 inches ☐Other, please
describe:
N/A

4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub-slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact

1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk-based screening levels will
In the unlikely event that evidence of impacted soil vapors are encountered (e.g., unusual odors
are identified or workers report lightheadedness or other unusual physical reaction), worker
breathing zone will be monitored using a calibrated photoionization detector. If results indicate
further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will
be implemented.
In the unlikely event contaminated soil vapors are encountered (e.g., unusual odors are
identified or workers report lightheadedness or other unusual physical reaction) during future
redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the
vapors will be performed. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering
controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.
22
EMP Version 2, June 2018
In the unlikely event there is evidence of potential indoor air issues (i.e. unusual odors) during future
redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the indoor
air will be performed. If warranted, safety screening procedures will include periodically screening
indoor air for volatile organic vapors with a calibrated photoionization detector. If results indicate
further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be
implemented.
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM – Please fill out the information below.
CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:

Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☐ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:

VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer

If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:

In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site-specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
Based on the results of prior soil and groundwater sampling at the site, VOCs are not site-specific
contaminants of concern. Therefore, there does not appear to be a vapor intrusion risk for non-
residential workers in the proposed on-site structures, and a vapor mitigation plan is not
warranted for the proposed redevelopment of the site.
23
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
EPA Method 6020 and EPA Method 7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):

☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199 and RCRA metals by TCLP

Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.

Underground Storage Tanks:

based on the laboratory analytical results. Impacted soil will be managed in accordance with the
Managing On-Site Soil section outlined above in the EMP.
In the event a UST or impacts associated with a UST release are discovered at the site during
redevelopment activities, the UST and/or UST related impacts will be addressed through the
Brownfields Program. Given the potential residential use of the site in the future, the fluids (if
present) and the UST will be removed and transported off-site for disposal at a suitable facility
During construction activities, contractors may encounter unknown sub-surface environmental
conditions (i.e. tanks, drums, or waste materials) that if encountered, will require proper
management. Prior to beginning site work, H&H will attend a pre-construction kick-off meeting
with the PD and the redevelopment contractors to discuss the DEQ approved EMP and various
scenarios when it would be appropriate and necessary to notify H&H of the discovery of unknown
subsurface features or potentially impacted media at the site.

In the event that such conditions are encountered during site development activities, the
environmental actions noted below will be used to direct environmental actions to be taken during
these activities and sampling data for potentially impacted soil and the disposition of impacted soil
will be provided to DEQ when the data becomes available.
24
EMP Version 2, June 2018
POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
Sub-Grade Feature/Pit:

Buried Waste Material:

Re-Use of Impacted Soils On-Site:

If unknown, impacted soil is identified on-site, management on-site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on-site.

If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:

☒ Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 1/31/2022

Please refer to description outlined in the Managing On-Site Soil section (Part 1.A.) of the EMP
above.
If excavation into buried wastes or significantly impacted soils occurs, the contractor is instructed to
stop work in that location and notify the environmental consultant. The environmental consultant
will review the materials and collect samples if warranted. In this event, confirmation sampling will
be conducted at representative locations in the base and the sidewalls of the excavation after the
waste or significantly impacted soil is removed. The confirmation samples will be analyzed for the
laboratory parameters listed above. Areas of suspected contaminated soil that remain at the site
after excavation is complete above the DEQ residential PSRGs will be managed pursuant to this
plan.
If a sub-grade feature or pit is encountered, it will be removed and the excavation will be filled with
soil or suitable fill and construction will proceed. If the pit has waste in it, the waste may be set
aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste disposal purposes for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs,
and TCLP metals and disposed off-site at a permitted facility or the waste will be managed in
accordance with the Managing On-Site Soil section outlined above in the EMP, whichever is most
applicable based on the type of waste present. If the observed waste characteristics indicate the
concrete or other construction material (e.g., brick) from the pit may potentially be contaminated to
a significant degree, the concrete or other construction material (e.g., brick) will be sampled and
analyzed by methods specified by the disposal facility.
25
EMP Version 2, June 2018
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment-related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).

☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement.
03/05/2021
27
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Table 1 (Page 1 of 3)
Summary of Soil Analytical DataFormer Southern Steel Facility
Brownfields Project No. 23052-19-060
3015 Wilkinson Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. ANR-007
Area of Potential Concern
Former
Septic Tank
Compressor
Condensate
Drain
Former UST 2010 PCB
Excavation
Sample ID
WBN-1 WBN-2 WBN-3 WBS-1 WBS-2 WBS-3 BH-8 BH-9 BH-12 BH-13
Date 10/7/2010 10/7/2010 10/7/2010 10/7/2010 10/7/2010 10/7/2010 11/24/2010 11/24/2010 11/24/2010 11/24/2010
Depth (ft bgs)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 6-8 0.5-1.5 2-4 0-4
VOCs (8260)Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.081J NA 0.054 J NA 12,000 140,000 -- --n-Butylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 780 12,000 -- --sec-Butylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,600 23,000 -- --Chloroform NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0064 NA <0.0013 NA 0.34 1.5 -- --Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0023 NA <0.0015 NA 6.1 27 -- --Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0024 NA <0.0016 NA NE NE -- --p-Isopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE -- --Methylene chloride NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0038 NA <0.0025 NA 58 650 -- --
Methyl acetate NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0018 NA <0.0012 NA 16,000 230,000 -- --
Methylcyclohexane NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0019 NA <0.0012 NA NE NE -- --
Methyl tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0019 NA <0.0013 NA 49 220 -- --
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.1 8.8 -- --
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 63 370 -- --Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0022 NA <0.0015 NA 990 9,700 -- --
SVOCs (8270)Acenaphthene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.11 N/A <0.093 NA 720 9,000 -- --Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.12 N/A <0.096 NA 720 9,000 -- --Anthracene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.11 N/A <0.091 NA 3,600 45,000 -- --Benzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.094 N/A <0.075 NA 1.1 21 -- --Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.094 N/A <0.077 NA 0.11 2.1 -- --Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.085 N/A <0.070 NA 1.1 21 -- --Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.12 N/A <0.10 NA NE NE -- --
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.097 N/A <0.080 NA 11 210 -- --
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.065 N/A <0.054 NA 110 2,100 -- --
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.080 N/A <0.066 NA 16 230 -- --
Fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.071 N/A <0.059 NA 480 6,000 -- --
Fluorene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.10 N/A <0.083 NA 480 6,000 -- --
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.10 N/A <0.083 NA 1.1 21 -- --
1-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA N/A NA NA 18 73 -- --
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.11 N/A <0.087 NA 48 600 -- --Naphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.12 N/A <0.099 NA 2.1 8.8 -- --Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.082 N/A <0.067 NA NE NE -- --Pyrene NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.083 NA <0.069 NA 360 4,500 -- --
Oil and Grease (9071)560 570 460 290 500 400 <104 254 NA 938 NE NE -- --
PCBs (8082)
PCB-1620 (Aroclor 1260) <0.99 <0.99 <0.99 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NA NA NA 0.0429 0.24 0.99 -- --
Metals (6010/6020/7471/7196)Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.98 NA 2.3 NA 0.68 3.0 1.0 - 18 4.8BariumNA NA NA NA NA NA 42.9 NA 56.2 NA 3,100 47,000 50 - 1,000 356BerylliumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 31 470 ND - 2.0 0.11CadmiumNA NA NA NA NA NA 1.4 NA 1.6 NA 14 200 1.0 - 10 (3)4.3 (3)
Chromium (Total)NA NA NA NA NA NA 23.8 NA 23.3 NA 0.31 6.5 7.0 - 300 65Hexavalent chromium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.31 6.5 NE NE
Cobalt NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.7 70 ND - 50 14.2
Lead 500 440 440 350 450 390 6.7 NA 543 NA 400 800 ND - 50 16
Manganese NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2,200 32,000 <8.0 - 3,394 (3)594 (3)
Mercury NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.096 NA 0.99 NA 2.3 9.7 0.03 - 0.52 0.121
Nickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 310 4,700 ND - 150 23SeleniumNA NA NA NA NA NA <0.35 NA <0.25 NA 78 1,200 <0.1 - 0.8 0.42SilverNANANANANANA0.032 J NA <0.02 NA 78 1,200 ND - 5.0 (3)NE
Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (July 2020).2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005.3) Background values for North Carolina soils are not specified; therefore, background values for soils of the southeastern United States are shown.Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.Underlined values exceed the Residential PSRG and average published background levels for North Carolina soil.Yellow shaded values exceed the Industrial/Commercial PSRG and published background levels for North Carolina soil.J = estimated concentration between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory reporting limitVOC = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons; PCBs = polychlorinated biphenyls;RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; NA = not analyzed; NE = Not Established
Industrial/
Commercial
PSRGs (1)
Residential
PSRGs (1)
Range
Background
Soil (2)
Mean
Background
Soil (2)
Northern Portion of 2010 Excavation Southern Portion of 2010 Excvation Screening Criteria
Published Background Levels for North Carolina Soil
S:\AAA‐Master Projects\Roby Realty (ANR)\ANR‐007 ‐ 3015 Wilkinson Blvd (former Southern Steel)\EMP\Data Tables\Soil & GW Data Tables
12/15/2020
Table 1 (Page 1 of 3)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1 (Page 2 of 3)
Summary of Soil Analytical DataFormer Southern Steel Facility
Brownfields Project No. 23052-19-060
3015 Wilkinson Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. ANR-007
Area of Potential Concern
Former UST Former
Shop No. 1
Former
Shop No. 2
Former
Shop No. 4
Former
Paint
Storage
Sample ID
SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 SB-5 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8 SB-9
Date 3/18/2019 3/18/2019 3/18/2019 3/19/2019 3/19/2019 3/19/2019 3/19/2019 3/18/2019 3/18/2019
Depth (ft bgs)2-4 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-3 2-4 1-3
VOCs (8260)Acetone NA NA NA <0.108 <0.0931 <0.0866 <0.0833 <0.097 <0.0991 12,000 140,000 -- --n-Butylbenzene NA NA NA <0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0043 <0.0042 <0.0048 <0.005 780 12,000 -- --sec-Butylbenzene NA NA NA <0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0043 <0.0042 <0.0048 <0.005 1,600 23,000 -- --Chloroform NA NA NA <0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0043 <0.0042 <0.0048 <0.005 0.34 1.5 -- --Ethylbenzene NA NA NA <0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0043 <0.0042 <0.0048 <0.005 6.1 27 -- --Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA <0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0043 <0.0042 <0.0048 <0.005 NE NE -- --p-Isopropyltoluene NA NA NA <0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0043 <0.0042 <0.0048 <0.005 NE NE -- --Methylene chloride NA NA NA <0.0216 <0.0186 <0.0173 <0.0167 <0.0194 <0.0198 58 650 -- --
Methyl ccetate NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 16,000 230,000 -- --
Methylcyclohexane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE -- --
Methyl tert-butyl ether NA NA NA <0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0043 <0.0042 <0.0048 <0.005 49 220 -- --
Naphthalene NA NA NA <0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0043 <0.0042 <0.0048 <0.005 2.1 8.8 -- --
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA <0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0043 <0.0042 <0.0048 <0.005 63 370 -- --Toluene NA NA NA <0.0054 <0.0047 <0.0043 <0.0042 <0.0048 <0.005 990 9,700 -- --
SVOCs (8270)Acenaphthene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 720 9,000 -- --Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 720 9,000 -- --Anthracene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3,600 45,000 -- --Benzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.1 21 -- --Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.11 2.1 -- --Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.1 21 -- --Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE -- --
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 11 210 -- --
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 110 2,100 -- --
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 16 230 -- --
Fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 480 6,000 -- --
Fluorene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 480 6,000 -- --
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.1 21 -- --
1-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 18 73 -- --
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 48 600 -- --Naphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.1 8.8 -- --Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE -- --Pyrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 360 4,500 -- --
Oil and Grease (9071)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE -- --
PCBs (8082)
PCB-1620 (Aroclor 1260) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.24 0.99 -- --
Metals (6010/6020/7471/7196)Arsenic 1.26 1.48 1.52 1.22 3.51 1.41 1.74 2.32 2.82 0.68 3.0 1.0 - 18 4.8Barium 42.3 69.5 162 59.3 59.8 73.1 42.9 74.2 1,060 3,100 47,000 50 - 1,000 356Beryllium 0.274 J 0.267 J 0.355 J 0.257 J 0.317 J 0.283 J 0.170 J 0.198 J 2.21 31 470 ND - 2.0 0.11Cadmium 0.163 J 0.112 J 0.146 J <0.0938 0.186 J <0.0950 0.108 J 0.325 J <0.102 14 200 1.0 - 10 (3)4.3 (3)
Chromium (Total) 23.8 18.8 25.4 20.9 63.1 34.0 11.6 78.3 21.2 0.31 6.5 7.0 - 300 65Hexavalent chromium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.31 6.5 NE NE
Cobalt 2.72 1.89 4.10 2.25 7.33 9.33 2.13 5.38 13.1 4.7 70 ND - 50 14.2
Lead 1,050 534 1,240 188 826 209 139 1,020 23.0 400 800 ND - 50 16
Manganese 81.9 60.7 159 172 429 272 104 258 274 2,200 32,000 <8.0 - 3,394 (3)594 (3)
Mercury 0.0681 0.106 0.0500 0.0701 0.0494 0.0314 0.0581 0.0926 0.0118 J 2.3 9.7 0.03 - 0.52 0.121
Nickel 3.42 2.22 6.45 2.27 6.44 11.0 2.21 8.12 6.47 310 4,700 ND - 150 23Selenium 0.305 J 0.342 J 0.425 J 0.340 J 0.408 J 0.423 J 0.308 J 0.452 J 1.71 78 1,200 <0.1 - 0.8 0.42Silver<0.191 <0.184 <0.186 <0.182 <0.180 <0.184 <0.175 <0.187 <0.197 78 1,200 ND - 5.0 (3)NE
Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (July 2020).2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005.3) Background values for North Carolina soils are not specified; therefore, background values for soils of the southeastern United States are shown.Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.Underlined values exceed the Residential PSRG and average published background levels for North Carolina soil.Yellow shaded values exceed the Industrial/Commercial PSRG and published background levels for North Carolina soil.J = estimated concentration between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory reporting limitVOC = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons; PCBs = polychlorinated biphenyls;RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; NA = not analyzed; NE = Not Established
Former Shop No. 3 Published Background Levels for North Carolina Soil
Residential
PSRGs (1)
Mean
Background
Soil (2)
Former Excavation Area Related to Transformer Oil
Release
Screening Criteria
Industrial/
Commercial
PSRGs (1)
Range
Background
Soil (2)
S:\AAA‐Master Projects\Roby Realty (ANR)\ANR‐007 ‐ 3015 Wilkinson Blvd (former Southern Steel)\EMP\Data Tables\Soil & GW Data Tables
12/15/2020
Table 1 (Page 2 of 3)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1 (Page 3 of 3)
Summary of Soil Analytical DataFormer Southern Steel Facility
Brownfields Project No. 23052-19-060
3015 Wilkinson Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. ANR-007
Area of Potential Concern
Sample ID
SB-10 SB-11 SB-12 SB-Dup-1 SB-13 SB-14 SB-15 SS-1 SS-1A
Date 2/15/2020 2/15/2020 2/15/2020 2/16/2020 2/15/2020 2/15/2020 2/15/2020 10/30/2019 2/24/2020
Depth (ft bgs)1-3 1-3 1-3 1-4 1-3 1-3 1-3 2-4 2-3
VOCs (8260)Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.8 <0.318 12,000 140,000 -- --n-Butylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.7 <0.095 780 12,000 -- --sec-Butylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.88 J <0.0714 1,600 23,000 -- --Chloroform NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.81J <0.0357 0.34 1.5 -- --Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.6 <0.0357 6.1 27 -- --Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.28 <0.0488 NE NE -- --p-Isopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 34.3 <0.0812 NE NE -- --Methylene chloride NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2.2 J <0.199 58 650 -- --
Methyl ccetate NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 16,000 230,000 -- --
Methylcyclohexane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE -- --
Methyl tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.55 <0.0963 49 220 -- --
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.82 0.981 2.1 8.8 -- --
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.46 J <0.0657 63 370 -- --Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.31 <0.0546 990 9,700 -- --
SVOCs (8270)Acenaphthene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.98 4.78 720 9,000 -- --Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.9 0.642 720 9,000 -- --Anthracene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.99 7.9 3,600 45,000 -- --Benzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.2 4.05 1.1 21 -- --Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.6 1.76 0.11 2.1 -- --Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.5 2.73 1.1 21 -- --Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.5 0.698 NE NE -- --
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.6 1.08 11 210 -- --
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.1 3.76 110 2,100 -- --
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.95 2.84 16 230 -- --
Fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.1 14.1 480 6,000 -- --
Fluorene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 5.86 480 6,000 -- --
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.7 0.703 1.1 21 -- --
1-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <1.0 0.924 18 73 -- --
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.97 1.35 48 600 -- --Naphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.91 0.702 2.1 8.8 -- --Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.96 18.1 NE NE -- --Pyrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.96 9.6 360 4,500 -- --
Oil and Grease (9071)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NE NE -- --
PCBs (8082)
PCB-1620 (Aroclor 1260) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.24 0.99 -- --
Metals (6010/6020/7471/7196)Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.37 NA 0.68 3.0 1.0 - 18 4.8BariumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA 86.0 NA 3,100 47,000 50 - 1,000 356BerylliumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 31 470 ND - 2.0 0.11CadmiumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.168 J NA 14 200 1.0 - 10 (3)4.3 (3)
Chromium (Total)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 33.4 NA 0.31 6.5 7.0 - 300 65Hexavalent chromium 3.76 2.48 <0.342 <0.318 3.58 4.01 <0.331 NA NA 0.31 6.5 NE NE
Cobalt NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.7 70 ND - 50 14.2
Lead NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 230 NA 400 800 ND - 50 16
Manganese NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2,200 32,000 <8.0 - 3,394 (3)594 (3)
Mercury NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.034 NA 2.3 9.7 0.03 - 0.52 0.121
Nickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 310 4,700 ND - 150 23SeleniumNA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.514 J NA 78 1,200 <0.1 - 0.8 0.42SilverNANANANANANANA<0.171 NA 78 1,200 ND - 5.0 (3)NE
Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (July 2020).2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005.3) Background values for North Carolina soils are not specified; therefore, background values for soils of the southeastern United States are shown.Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.Underlined values exceed the Residential PSRG and average published background levels for North Carolina soil.Yellow shaded values exceed the Industrial/Commercial PSRG and published background levels for North Carolina soil.J = estimated concentration between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory reporting limitVOC = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons; PCBs = polychlorinated biphenyls;RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; NA = not analyzed; NE = Not Established
Southeastern Portion of Proposed Building 1Northern Portion of the Site Central Portion of the Site Eastern Portion of the Site Published Background Levels for North Carolina Soil
Residential
PSRGs (1)
Industrial/
Commercial
PSRGs (1)
Range
Background
Soil (2)
Mean
Background
Soil (2)
Screening Criteria
S:\AAA‐Master Projects\Roby Realty (ANR)\ANR‐007 ‐ 3015 Wilkinson Blvd (former Southern Steel)\EMP\Data Tables\Soil & GW Data Tables
12/15/2020
Table 1 (Page 3 of 3)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2
Summary of Composite Soil Sample Analytical Data
Former Southern Steel Facility
Brownfields Project No. 23052-19-060
3015 Wilkinson Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. ANR-007
Area of Site
Sample ID B1-A B1-B B1-C B2-A B2-B B2-C B3-A B3-B B3-C Comp-1 Comp-2 Comp-3 Comp-4 Comp-5 Comp-6
Sample Date 9/24/2019 9/24/2019 9/24/2019 9/24/2019 9/24/2019 9/24/2019 9/24/2019 9/24/2019 9/24/2019 10/30/2019 10/30/2019 10/30/2019 10/30/2019 10/30/2019 10/30/2019
Sample Type Composite Composite Composite Composite Composite Composite Composite Composite Composite Composite Composite Composite Composite Composite Composite
Sample Depth (ft bgs)0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4
Metals (6010D/7470A TCLP)
Arsenic <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.0047 0.0070 J 0.016 J <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.0047 5.0
Barium 0.51 0.53 0.53 0.95 0.59 0.70 0.50 0.41 0.52 0.90 0.75 0.76 0.90 0.63 0.72 100
Cadmium 0.0015 J 0.0015 J 0.0013 J <0.00040 0.0040 J 0.0043 J 0.0028 J 0.0050 <0.00040 0.0054 0.0036 J 0.0028 J 0.0034 J 0.0030 J 0.0036 J 1.0
Chromium (total)<0.0010 0.0038 J <0.0010 <0.0010 0.0044 J <0.0010 <0.0010 0.0020 J <0.0010 0.031 J 0.015 J 0.011 J 0.011 J 0.025 J 0.0057 J 5.0
Lead 13.5 26.0 4.3 0.78 0.43 2.2 0.19 0.13 0.017 J 11.4 4.5 5.8 4.0 1.8 2.5 5.0
Mercury <0.00010 <0.00010 <0.00010 <0.00010 <0.00010 <0.00010 <0.00010 <0.00010 <0.00010 <0.00010 <0.00010 <0.00010 <0.00010 <0.00010 <0.00010 0.2
Selenium <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.0047 0.0056 J <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.0047 <0.0047 0.0078 J 0.024 J <0.0047 0.0088 J 1.0
Silver <0.0025 <0.0025 <0.0025 0.0028 J <0.0025 <0.0025 0.0042 J 0.0031 J <0.0025 <0.0025 <0.0025 <0.0025 <0.0025 <0.0025 <0.0025 5.0
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
Proposed Building No. 1 Proposed Building No. 2 Proposed Building No. 3 EPA's Maximum
Concentration For
Toxicity
Characteristic
Leaching Procedure
(mg/L)1
Area Between Proposed Building Nos.1 and 2
Notes
1) EPA Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) regulatory level (November 2004).
J = estimated concentration above the laboratory method detection limit but below the laboratory reporting limit
Soil concentrations are reported in miligrams per liter (mg/L).
Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limit.
Bold indicates an exceedance of EPA's Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for TCLP regulatory level.
ft bgs = feet below ground surface
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Roby Realty (ANR)\ANR-007 - 3015 Wilkinson Blvd (former Southern Steel)\EMP\Data Tables\TCLP_SoilTable
3/4/2020
Table 2
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data
Former Southern Steel Facility
Brownfields Project No. 23052-19-060
3015 Wilkinson Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. ANR-007
Sample ID
BH-8 BH-12 TMW-1 TMW-2 TMW-3 TMW-4
Date 11/24/2010 11/24/2010 3/19/2019 3/19/2019 3/19/2019 3/19/2019
Sample Location
Former Septic Tank
Downgradient of
Former Steel
Fabrication Shops
Former Shop No. 4 Background
VOCs (8260) Acetone 5.5 J <2.2 <25 <25 <25 NA 6,000Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.37 J <0.21 <1 <1 <1 NA 3.0Chloromethane <0.11 0.25 J <1 <1 <1 NA 20
SVOCs (8270) All BDL All BDL NA NA NA NA --
RCRA Metals (6010/6020/7470)
Arsenic 230 J 13 0.294 J <0.250 1.38 J <0.250 10
Barium 2,800 530 74.9 53.6 96.2 113 700
Beryllium NA NA <0.120 <0.120 <0.120 0.292 J 2.0
Cadmium <25 3.0 <0.160 <0.160 <0.160 <0.160 2.0
Chromium 2,400 180 0.738 J 0.553 J 0.756 J 11.9 10
Cobalt NA NA 16.5 12.5 3.57 0.825 J 1.0 (2)
Lead 4,200 2,000 0.835 J 0.892 J 0.424 J 0.370 J 15
Manganese NA NA 3,020 605 336 16.9 50
Mercury 3.3 3.0 <0.0490 <0.0490 <0.0490 <0.0490 1.0
Nickel NA NA 2.52 2.58 0.942 J 5.38 100
Selenium <190 <3.8 <0.380 0.520 J 0.418 J 1.04 J 20Silver<5 <0.10 <0.310 0.632 J <0.310 <0.310 20
Oil and Grease (1664)6,800 NA NA NA NA NA --
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) 15A NCAC 02L.0202 Groundwater Standards (2L Standards) (April 2013).2) DEQ Interim Maximum Allowable Concentration (IMAC) established October 1, 2010.
3) Elevated metals concentrations for samples BH-8 and BH-12 are likely due to turbidity.
With the exception of metals, only constituents detected in at least one sample are shown.
Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L).
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.Bold values exceed 2L Standards.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOC = semi-volatile organic compounds; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act;
J = estimated concentration between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory reporting limitBDL = Below Laboratory Detection Limit; NA = Not Analyzed; -- = not applicable
2L Standards (1)
Former UST
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Roby Realty (ANR)\ANR-007 - 3015 Wilkinson Blvd (former Southern Steel)\EMP\Data Tables\Soil & GW Data Tables
3/5/2020
Table 3
Hart & Hickman, PC
0 2000 4000
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEETN
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
CHARLOTTE WEST, NORTH CAROLINA 1996
TITLE
PROJECT
SITE LOCATION MAP
FORMER SOUTHERN STEEL FACILITY3015 WILKINSON BOULEVARDCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
JOB NO:
REVISION NO:
FIGURE:
2-12-20 0
1ANR-007
SITE
SB-9
SB-6 SB-7
SB-2
SB-3
SB-8/TMW-3
SB-1/TMW-1
TMW-2
SB-4
SB-5
TMW-4
ANDREW JACKSON HIGHWAYASHLEY ROADASHLEY ROADASHLEY ROADASHLEY ROAD
WILKINSON BOULEVARD WEYLAND AVENUESB-10
SB-11
SB-12
SB-13
SB-14
SB-15
BH-9
BH-13
BH-12
BH-8
SS-1/
SS-1A
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. ANR-007
DATE: 3-3-2020
FIGURE NO. 2
FORMER SOUTHERN STEEL FACILITY
3015 WILKINSON BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE AND SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
RAILROAD TRACKS
SOIL BORING LOCATION
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL
LOCATION
CO-LOCATED SOIL BORING /
TEMPORARY WELL LOCATION
PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
NOTES
1. BASE MAP OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG
COUNTY GIS.
2. SOIL SAMPLES SB-1 THROUGH SB-9 COLLECTED
BY H&H ON 3/18/19 AND 3/19/19.
3. TEMPORARY MONITORING WELLS TMW-1
THROUGH TMW-4 SAMPLED BY H&H ON 3/19/19.
4. SOIL SAMPLES SB-10 THROUGH SB-15
COLLECTED BY H&H ON 2/15/2020.
5. PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN WAS
PREPARED BY AMERICAN ENGINEERING
ASSOCIATES - SOUTHEAST, P.A.
6. SOIL AND/OR GROUNDWATER SAMPLES BH-8,
BH-9, BH-12, AND BH-13 WERE COLLECTED BY
CRA GEOLOGICAL SERVICES, INC. ON 11/23/2010
AND 11/24/2010.
7. SOIL SAMPLES WBN-1 THROUGH WBN-3 AND
WBS-1 THROUGH WBS-3 WERE COLLECTED BY
CRA GEOLOGICAL SERVICES, INC. ON 10/7/2010.
EASTWAY WRECKER SERVICE
(2801 WILKINSON BLVD)
PARKER VETERINARY HOSPITAL
(2820 WILKINSON BLVD)
BBQ KING
(2800 WILKINSON BLVD)
QUIKTRIP
(3025 WILKINSON BLVD)
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS
BUS MAINTENANCE FACILITY
(3101 WILKINSON BLVD)
ABC STORE
(2915 WILKINSON BLVD)
PROPOSED
BUILDING
NO.1
PROPOSED
BUILDING
NO.2
PROPOSED
BUILDING
NO.3
WBS-3
WBS-1
WBN-1WBN-3
WBN-2
WBS-2
TRANSFORMER RELEASE EXCAVATION AREA
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Roby Realty (ANR)\ANR-007 - 3015 Wilkinson Blvd (former Southern Steel)\Soil Assessment\Figures\Site and Sample Location Map.dwg, FIG 2 SITE MAP, 3/6/2020 10:19:52 AM, sperry
ASHLEY ROADASHLEY ROADASHLEY ROAD
WILKINSON BOULEVARD WEYLAND AVENUEREVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. ANR-007
DATE: 3-3-20
FIGURE NO. 3
FORMER SOUTHERN STEEL FACILITY
3015 WILKINSON BOULEVARD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SOIL CHARACTERIZATION SAMPLELOCATION MAP
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
RAILROAD TRACKS
COMPOSITE SOIL BORING
$5($1 BASED ON TCLP
/($''$7$
PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT
PREVIOUSLY PROPOSEDBUILDING FOOTPRINT
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
NOTES
AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURGCOUNTY GIS.
COMPOSITE SOIL SAMPLES B1-A THROUGH B3-CCOLLECTED ON 9/24/19. COMPOSITE SOIL SAMPLES
COMP-1 THROUGH COMP-6 COLLECTED ON 10/30/19.
COMPOSITE SAMPLES ARE COMPRISED OF SOILALIQUOTS FROM 0-2 FEET BELOW GROUNDSURFACE (BGS) AND 2-4 FEET BGS FROM EACHCOMPOSITE SOIL BORING IN EACH AREA.
SAMPLE LOCATIONS ESTIMATED USING TRIMBLEGPS.
SOIL CHARACTERIZATION SAMPLING WAS LIMITED
TO THE AREAS OF PREVIOUSLY PROPOSEDBUILDING FOUNDATIONS AND THE AREA BETWEEN
PROPOSED BUILDING 1 AND BUILDING 2.
PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN WASPREPARED BY AMERICAN ENGINEERINGASSOCIATES - SOUTHEAST P.A. ASHLEY ROADASHLEY ROAD
WILKINSON BOULEVARD WEYLAND AVENUEQUIKTRIP(3025 WILKINSON BLVD)
MECKLENBURG COUNTY ABC
(2915 WILKINSON BLVD)
MECKLENBURG COUNTY SCHOOLS BUS
MAINTENANCE FACILITY(3101 WILKINSON BLVD)
EASTWAY WRECKER SERVICES
(2801 WILKINSON BLVD)
MULTI-TENANT STRIP MALL
SHELL GAS STATION(3000 WILKINSON BLVD)
BAR-B-Q KING(2900 WILKINSON BLVD)
PARKER VETERINARY
HOSPITAL(2820 WILKINSON BLVD)
QUICK AUTO SALES(2926 WILKINSON BLVD)
PROPOSED BUILDING 1
PROPOSED BUILDING 2 PROPOSED BUILDING 3
COMP-1 COMP-2
COMP-3 COMP-4
COMP-5 COMP-6
B1-B
B1-A
B1-C
B2-A
B2-B
B2-C
B3-A
B3-B
B3-C
B1-A-2 B1-A-3
B1-A-4
B1-B-1
B1-B-3
B1-C-1
B1-C-3
B1-B-2
B1-B-4
B1-C-2
B1-C-4
B2-A-1
B2-A-2 B2-A-3
B2-A-4
B2-B-1
B2-B-3
B2-C-1
B2-C-3 B2-C-4
B2-C-2
B2-B-4
B2-B-2
B3-A-1 B3-A-2 B3-A-3
B3-A-4
B3-B-1
B3-B-3
B3-C-1
B3-C-3
B3-B-2
B3-B-4
B3-C-2
B3-C-4
A B
DC
A B
DC
A B
DC
A B
DC
A B A B
DC
B1-A-1
DC
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Roby Realty (ANR)\ANR-007 - 3015 Wilkinson Blvd (former Southern Steel)\Soil Assessment\Figures\Site and Sample Location Map.dwg, FIG 3 FINAL, 3/6/2020 10:24:44 AM, sperryAREA 1

Appendix A Site Redevelopment Plan

Appendix B Cut/Fill Analysis
PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE
PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCE
PCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCE
P
C
C
E
P
C
C
E
PCCE
PCCE
PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCE PCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE OEOEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE
OE
OE
OE
OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEG G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
G G
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGW W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
DYH
OEOEOEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OEOEOEOEG
WWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSOEOEOEEX. 15" RCP
EX. 15" RCPEX. 18" RCP
OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE
PCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCEPCCE50' EX. R/WDAVID L. WILLIAMS
D.B. 11826, PG. 825
TAX PARCEL #117-011-15
EX. 30"RCP
LP
10'x70'35'x35'10'x70'35
'
x
3
5
'
35'x35'
10'x70'35'x35'10'x70'
20' TRANSITIONAL SETBACK
Concrete
PARCEL 1
QUIKTRIP CORPORATION
MB. 54, PG. 565
DB. 29066, PG. 563
TAX PARCEL #11701122
TOTAL AREA: 118,875 SF (2.73 AC)N01°45'56"E 144.08'S03°19'33"W 144.02'PP
EX. 30" Curb & GutterEX. 30" RCP
EX. Concrete Sidewalk 75' FUTURE R/WWMWM
OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE
EX. 36"RCPEX. 36"RCP
E
X
.

1
8
"
R
C
P
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSLP
8" TERROEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEAsphalt
FH
SS SS
S03°19'33"W 608.56'(TOTAL)EXISTING REGIONALSTORMWATERMANAGEMENT BASINDRY DETENTIONPP
LOT 1
MB 61, PG 61
MECKLENBURG COUNTY ABC
DB. 30170, PG. 567
TAX PARCEL #11701122
EX
.

P
D
E
S03°24'51"W 337.71'2
0
'

T
R
A
N
S
I
T
I
O
N
A
L

S
E
T
B
A
C
K
PARCEL 4
MB 57, PG 114
WILKINSON HOLDINGS I, LLC
DB. 27179, PG. 152
TAX PARCEL #11701124
TOTAL AREA: 39,028 SF (0.896 AC)
FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY9,971 SF (0.229 AC)S12°28'49"E

143
.01
'(TOTAL)S86°35'09"W 120.50'
S86°35'09"W 323.33'S86°35'09"W 288.32'
N86°38'06"W 43.11'
TOP OF BANK FIELD LOCATED
EX. HEADWALL
N88°05'56"W 651.56'
N88°05'56"W 109.64'
S76°00'03
"
W
2038.30' G
R
O
U
N
D
2037.98'
G
R
I
D
NGS MONUMENT "254 AZ MK"
NC GRID NAD83
N: 541,723.45 FT (37.5984387° / 37°35'54.3
8
"

N
)
E: 1,437,993.26 FT (84.0318138° / -84°01'54
.
5
3
"

E
)
CGF: 0.99984316
CONTROL CORNER
NC CORNER NAD83
N: 541,230.37 (37.5984387° / 37°35'34.62
"

N
)
E: 1,436,015.50 (-84.0331665° / 84°01'59
.
4
"

E
)EX. 54" CMPCONTROL CORNER
NC CORNER NAD83
N: 541,255.63
E: 1,435,254.72
S
2
4
°
5
6
'2
2
"
E

25
0
.
0
1
'
LP
30' CROSS ACCESS AND UTILITIESPERMANENT DETENTION EASEMENT
EX. 20' PCCE TO WILKINSON BLVD 36' CROSS ACCESS AND UTILITIESPERMANENT DETENTION EASEMENTPPPP
STOPSIGN
DO NOTENTER SIGN
S
S
S
S
EX. Concrete Sidewalk EX. PDES
N1°34'50"E 340.79'EX. 18" RCPEX. 54" CMPEX. RCP EX.
2
4
"

R
C
P
E
X
.

R
C
P
E
X
.

R
C
PEX.
RCP
EX. RCP
EX. RCP
EX. RCP EX
.

R
C
P
R/W R/W R/WR/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W
SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
F
U
T
U
R
E

R
I
G
H
T
-
O
F
-W
A
Y
S
LOT 2
MB 61, PG 61
END SPOT 1, LLC
DB. 33272, PG. 665
TAX PARCEL #11701122
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
METAL RETAINING WALL EX. 24" RCPAPPROX. LOCATION END
OF PIPE AS PER
PREVIOUS SURVEY.
POSSIBLY BURIED
INV. 725.49
EX. 36"RCP
RIM:731.72
IN(A):724.72
IN(B):724.60
OUT:724.66
RIM:730.24
IN(A):726.09
IN(B):726.33
OUT:726.00
RIM:733.17
IN:728.82
OUT:728.72
RIM:729.45
IN:723.21
OUT:723.10
INV:723.01
(B)
(A)
(B)(A)20' STREAMSIDE ZONE15'UPLANDZONE35' SWIM BUFFERTOP OF BANK FIELD LOCATED
35' SWIM BUFFER20' STREAMSIDE ZONE15'UPLANDZONEWD732
730730729 731732
733
72572672772872972372372472572672772872973
0
731 733732732
733
732
732
740
73
0
732
730
729
728725 729 730
731
7
3
2
733
731
731 731 732 73373
4 7457
3
2 735
740
73
1
745
7
3
3
7
3
4
735
2
4
"

R
C
P
24" RCP
24" RCP 24" RCP15" RCP15" RCP15" RCP15" RCPA1-CB
A2-DIA4-DI
A3-DI
A6-DI
A5-DI
A7-DI
A8-DI
BUILDING
CBUILDING
BBUILDING
A
EX. DRY
DETENTION
POND
LP: 731.34
LP: 732.30
LP: 732.23
LP: 732.12
LP: 732.42
LP: 732.16
LP: 732.69
LP: 732.03
QUIK TRIP ABC STORE
HP: 732.79
HP: 732.82
HP: 734.05
HP: 733.47
HP: 733.54
733.51
734.25 734.25
733.23733.23
732.99 732.99
733.06
733.26733.74
733.22
-2:1-2:1
100' NORFOLK SOUTHERN R/W733.11
733.11733.10
733.10
TC: 733.47FL: 732.97
TC: 733.09FL: 732.59
TC: 733.51FL: 733.01
TC: 734.08FL: 733.58
TC: 733.46FL: 732.96
TC: 733.50FL: 733.00
TC: 733.55FL: 733.05
TC: 734.11FL: 733.61
TC: 734.21FL: 733.71
TC: 734.11FL: 733.61
TC: 733.52FL: 733.02
TC: 733.39
FL: 732.89
TC: 734.03FL: 733.53
TC: 733.62FL: 733.12
TC: 733.60FL: 733.10
TC: 733.57FL: 733.07
TC: 733.60FL: 733.10
TC: 733.60
FL: 733.10
TC: 733.12
FL: 732.62
TC: 733.08FL: 732.58
TC: 733.53FL: 733.03
TC: 733.53
FL: 733.03
TC: 733.50FL: 733.00
TC: 733.69FL: 733.19
TC: 734.11FL: 733.61
TC: 734.11
FL: 733.61
TC: 732.97FL: 732.47
TC: 732.33FL: 731.83
TC: 733.53FL: 733.03
TC: 733.53FL: 733.03
TC: 733.00FL: 732.50
TC: 733.57FL: 733.07
TC: 733.55FL: 733.05
TC: 733.60
FL: 733.10
TC: 733.60FL: 733.10
TC: 733.60
FL: 733.10
TC: 733.19FL: 732.69
TC: 733.12FL: 732.62
TC: 733.01FL: 732.51
TC: 732.47FL: 731.97
TC: 732.31FL: 731.81
TC: 735.00FL: 734.50MEET EX.TC: 734.03FL: 733.53MEET EX.TC: 732.68FL: 732.18
MEET EX.
TC: 731.63FL: 731.13MEET EX.
TC: 731.24FL: 730.74
MEET EX.
TC: 732.08FL: 731.58MEET EX.
TC: 733.26
FL: 732.76MEET EX.
TC: 731.92FL: 731.42MEET EX.
-1.00%-5.49%
-1.01%-0.76%-1.00%-2.18%
-1.23%
-2.00%-3.00%-1.00%-1.00%-1.30%-1.69%-1.00%-1.00%-1.00%-3.65%-1.79%-2.71%-1.00%-2.14%-1.67%-1.16%-1.37%-1.59%-1.00%-1.00%-1.84%-1.47%-1.47%-1.19%-1.19%-1.28%-1.18%-1.31%-1.31%-1.16%-2.00%-2.00%-1.00%-2.00%-1.59%-1.00%-2.16%-1.00%-1.72%
-1.11%-0.45%-1.49%
-0.89%-0.43%-2.00%
-1.54%-1.00%-2.00%
-2.00%0.00%-0.95%
-1.68%0.53%WILKINSON BLVD (US-29 / NC-74)
100' NCDOT PUBLIC R/W
730.52
CONVERT EX. CB
TO DI
EX. 20' PCCE TO WILKINSON BLVDPB 57 PG 114
732
733
733
73
3 733734
734ADJUST EX JBRIM TO GRADE -1.00%-1.00%-0.95%
-1.00%3.76%3.76%-2.00%-1.00%EX. ACCESS EASEMENTPB 57 PG 114 100' R/WEX. CBRIM: 733.17INV IN: 728.82INV OUT: 728.72
EX. CBRIM: 731.72INV IN: 724.72INV IN: 724.60INV OUT: 724.66
EX. JB A-9RIM: 729.45INV IN: 723.21INV OUT: 723.10
EX. FES A-10INV OUT: 723.01
EX. CBRIM: 730.30INV OUT: 726.60
EX. CB
EX. CB
EX. CB EX. JB EX. CBRIM: 734.92INV OUT: 730.07EX. CBRIM: 734.94INV IN: 729.53INV OUT: 729.53
EX.OUTLETSTRUCTURE
EX. 36" RCPEX. 36" RCPEX.
2
4
"

R
C
P
E
X
.

1
5
"

H
D
P
E
EX CBRIM: 730.43INV OUT: 724.93
EX CB
EX CB EX CB
EX 15" HDPE EX 15" HDPE
EX 15" HD
P
E
EX CB
EX. 36" RCP
EX. 18" RCP EX. 12" RCPEX. PDEEX
.

P
D
E
EX
.

1
5
"

R
C
PEX. 18" RCPEX. 1.5' CURB & GUTTER
EX. 1.5' CURB & GUTTER
EX. 1.5' CURB & GUTTER
EX. 1.5' CURB & GUTTER
EX. ASPHALT EX. ASPHALTEX. 1.5' CURB & GUTTEREX. 1.5' CURB & GUTTEREX. ASPHALT
EX. CONC.
EX. CONC.DRIVEWAY
EX. ASPHALTDRIVEWAY
EX. 2.0' CURB & GUTTER
EX. 2.0' CURB & GUTTER
EX. CONC. PAVEMENT
EX. 2.0' CURB & GUTTER
EX. 2.0' CURB & GUTTER
EX. CONC. PAVEMENT
EX. CONC.DRIVEWAY EX. ASPHALTEX. 2.5' CURB & GUTTEREX. CBRIM: 730.24INV IN: 726.09INV IN: 726.33INV OUT: 726.00
-1.00%-1.29%-2.00%TC: 733.14FL: 732.64
-2.53%
732
-1.00%-1.00%-1.00%TC: 733.56
FL: 733.06
733734733733731.05
732.07
733.67
733.37
733.27
733.08
732.98733.59 733.34 733.34
733.91
733.85 733.85
734.05
-1.00%733.67
731.12
731.15
732.17
733.47 732.66 TC: 734.11
FL: 733.61
TC: 733.67FL: 733.17
TC: 733.57FL: 733.07
TC: 733.22FL: 732.72
TC: 733.22FL: 732.72
TC: 733.50FL: 733.00
733
73
3
73
3 734734
7327337
3
2 733-1.71%-1.00%-1.00%TC: 733.35
FL: 732.85
TC: 733.19
FL: 732.69
TC: 734.20FL: 733.70
734.25
733.57
FFE = 733.67 FFE = 734.25
FFE = 733.74
731.88
732.77
731
EX. 24" RCPINV: 729.45
EX. 24" RCP BEGINNIGLOCATION UNKNOWN
REMOVE EX. 24" RCP UNDERPROPOSED PAVEMENT. PLUG
PIPE END PER NCDOT STD. 840.71
10" HDPE
ROOF DRAIN@ MIN. 1.0%
8" HDPEROOF DRAIN
@ MIN. 1.0%
8" HDPE
ROOF DRAIN
@ MIN. 1.0%
8" HDPEROOF DRAIN
@ MIN. 1.0%
8" HDPEROOF DRAIN@ MIN. 1.0%
10" HDPE
ROOF DRAIN
@ MIN. 1.0%
10" HDPEROOF DRAIN
@ MIN. 1.0%
8" HDPE
ROOF DRAIN@ MIN. 1.0%
8" HDPEROOF DRAIN@ MIN. 1.0%
10" HDPEROOF DRAIN@ MIN. 1.0%
10" HDPE
ROOF DRAIN
@ MIN. 1.0%
8" HDPE
ROOF DRAIN
@ MIN. 1.0%
8" HDPE
ROOF DRAIN
@ MIN. 1.0%
8" HDPEROOF DRAIN@ MIN. 1.0%
8" HDPEROOF DRAIN@ MIN. 1.0%
10" HDPEROOF DRAIN@ MIN. 1.0%8" HDPEROOF DRAIN
@ MIN. 1.0%
8" HDPEROOF DRAIN@ MIN. 1.0%
R2-COGRND = 733.62
INV = 730.73
R4-COGRND = 733.62INV = 729.80
R6-COGRND = 733.62
INV = 729.45
R9-CO
GRND = 733.62INV = 728.92
R8-COGRND = 733.62
INV = 729.33
R14-CO
GRND = 733.55INV = 728.92
R13-CO
GRND = 733.55INV = 729.33
R11-COGRND = 733.55INV = 729.45
R21-CO
GRND = 734.13INV = 729.55R16-DSGRND = 733.55INV = 729.32
R19-COGRND = 733.19INV = 728.85
R18-COGRND = 733.55
INV = 729.31
R23-COGRND = 734.13INV = 729.54
R24-COGRND = 733.69INV = 729.08
R26-CO
GRND = 733.76INV = 729.61
R29-CO
GRND = 733.52
INV = 729.14
R28-CO
GRND = 734.21
INV = 729.61
ROOF DRAINS DISCHARGE TOGRADE ALONG FRONT OF THEBUILDING SEE SHEET C5.1 FOR
TRIBUTARY AREAS
ROOF DRAINS DISCHARGE TOGRADE ALONG FRONT OF THEBUILDING SEE SHEET C5.1 FOR
TRIBUTARY AREAS
ROOF DRAINS DISCHARGE TOGRADE ALONG FRONT OF THEBUILDING SEE SHEET C5.1 FOR
TRIBUTARY AREAS
R15-DSGRND = 730.13INV = 729.38
R17-DSGRND = 730.13INV = 729.37
R10-DSGRND = 730.27
INV = 729.51
R12-DSGRND = 730.15
INV = 729.39
R22-DSGRND = 730.36
INV = 729.60
R20-DSGRND = 730.37INV = 729.61
R25-DS
GRND = 730.43INV = 729.67
R27-DS
GRND = 730.43INV = 729.67
R1-DS
GRND = 731.55INV = 730.79
R3-DSGRND = 730.62
INV = 729.86
R5-DSGRND = 730.27
INV = 729.51
R7-DS
GRND = 730.15INV = 729.39 EX. 5' CONC. SIDEWALKEX. 5' CONC. SIDEWALKWILKINSON BLVD (US-29 / NC-74)
100' NCDOT PUBLIC R/W
TC: 735.24
FL: 734.74
UGEUGEUGEUGEUGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE
UGEUGEUGEUGEUGE UGE UGE
UTUTUTUT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT
UGEUGEUGEUGEUGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGE UGE UGE
UTUTUTUT UT UT UT
UTUTUTUT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UT UTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUTUT UT UT UT
AREA 1
CUT/FILL
ANALYSIS
--
PROPOSED TREE PROTECTION FENCE
( IN FEET )
0
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 inch = 30 ft.
15 30 6030
LOCATION MAP
SCALE: 1" = 1,500'
Wilkinson Blvd
Remount RoadDonald
Ross
Road
As
h
l
e
y
RoadWest Blv
d
N
C-
1
6
0
Greenland Ave
SITE
To I-77
To I-485
Old Steele Creek RdWeyland AveUE UE
DROP INLET & PIPE
CATCH BASIN & PIPE
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE & PIPED
POWER LINE (UNDERGROUND)
LEGEND:
R/W
e e e
G G
E E
SS SS
FO FO FO
W W
EASEMENT
RIGHT-OF-WAY
SETBACK
GAS LINE
POWER LINE (OVERHEAD)
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
STORM DRAIN PIPE
TELEPHONE LINE (UNDERGROUND)
WATER LINE
PROPERTY LINE
X X FENCE
TP TP
680
677
680
677
EX. MAJOR CONTOUR
EX. MINOR CONTOUR
TO WILKINSON BLVDINTERSECTION WITHASHLEY ROADPROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT
PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT
PAVEMENT
PROPOSED STANDARD ASPHALTPAVEMENT
4-13-20
1
1
1
1
2
Elevations Table
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Minimum Elevation
-4.00
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
Maximum Elevation
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
Area
1455.05
2737.22
5259.51
15276.05
28434.38
27936.75
35301.14
24552.73
1725.18
Color
American Engineering Associates - Southeast, P.A.8008 Corporate Center Dr - Suite 110Charlotte, NC 28226704-375-2438AMERICANEngineeringFIRM # C-3881 *** 3 Days Before Digging ***
North Carolina 811
811 or 1-800-632-4949
Remote Ticket Entry
http://nc811.org/remoteticketentry.htm
L
ARPONISSEFO
ENGINE RE
33046
SEAL
JOB NUMBER:
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
C190079
CT
CDA
2-21-2020
2-21-20
1-28-2021
NOTES:
1.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FILL MATERIAL WITHIN PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINTS,UP TO 1 FT OF CUT WILL OCCUR TO REMOVE STRUCTURALLY UNSUITABLE SOILS WITHHIGH ORGANIC CONTENT.
2.AREA 1 NOTED BELOW CONTAINS POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS LEVELS OF LEAD. SOILSREMOVED FROM THIS AREA MUST BE STOCKPILED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEDEQ-APPROVED ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN AND CHARACTERIZED PRIORTO EXPORT FROM THE SITE OR PRIOR TO PLACEMENT IN A DESIGNATED AREA ON THESITE.