22075 Seaboard Station_Approved EMP

NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.
The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory -compliant
decision -making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development -related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project,
and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be
cause for a reopener
So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.
® Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields' objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.
® Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:
® A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.
❑ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.
® Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.
❑ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
on site after construction grading.
❑ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).
® A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.
® Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
® Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
❑ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.
❑ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.
❑ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.
❑ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.
® A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.
® If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Date: 10/2/2020
GENERAL INFORMATION
Revision Date (if applicable): 10/2/2020
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Seaboard Station
Brownfields Project Number: 22075-18-092
Brownfields Property Address: 605 Halifax St., 721 Halifax St., 5 Seaboard Ave., 18 Seaboard Ave., 8 W.
Peace St., 10 W. Franklin St., and 802 Semart Dr., Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
Brownfields Property Area (acres): 6.72-acres
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ....................... ❑ Yes ® No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit............ ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
COMMUNICATIONS
A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE -SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.
Prospective Developer (PD): Seaboard Station Joint Venture LP
Contact Person: Robert Steward
Phone Numbers: Office: Click or tap hereto enter text. Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Contractor for PD: Clancy & Theys Construction
Contact Person: John Andras, Vice President
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Environmental Consultant: ECS Southeast, LLP
Contact Person: Scott M. Werley, P.G.
Phone Numbers: Office: 919-861-9846 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Brad Atkinson
Phone Numbers: Office: 919-707-8748 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
3
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
Hazardous Waste Sites — NCDSCA DC920046
Michael Cunningham
919-707-8361
[e-mail]
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsitetask:
On -site assessment or remedial activities: .................................................... 10 days Prior
IK
Construction or grading start: .......................................................................... 10 days Prior
IK
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ................................................................................ Within 48 hours
IK
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones): ................................... Within 48 hours
Installation of mitigation systems: ................................................................ 10 days Prior
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ................................................................................. Within 30 days
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
®Residential ❑Recreational ❑Institutional ®Commercial ®Office ®Retail ❑ Industrial
El Other specify:
The redevelopment plan will include a large-scale mixed -use center planned in three stages
consisting of approximately 650 apartment units, a hotel, and approximately 100,000 square feet
of retail space and associated structured parking.
2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth -moving activities
at the site:
® Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
❑ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
4
EMP Version 2, June 2018

❑ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
The existing buildings are planned to be demolished and the concrete slabs and foundations also
removed. Phase I demolition is set to take place in approximately mid -September 2020.
Excavation will occur in multiple phases. Phase I includes two stages, Block A and Block B. Block A
consists of the 8 W. Peace St, 605 Halifax St, and 5 Seaboard Ave parcels. Block B consists of the
18 Seaboard Ave and 721 Halifax St parcels. In Blocks A & B, current plans exist to demolish
existing buildings and ancillary structures, hardscapes, landscapes, concrete, pavement,
sidewalks, inclusive of existing tennis courts, fencing, and lighting. Existing trees and shrubbery
will be cleared and grubbed. Demolition includes complete removal and/or safe termination of
existing utilities in accordance with applicable code. Construction waste will be legally disposed
of. Upon completion of demolition, the site shall be completely clear of debris and ready for
mass grading. If encountered, demolition shall include removal of known underground storage
tanks or other underground infrastructure in accordance with applicable local code. Block A will
undergo approximately 21,000 cubic yards (CY) of cut excavation for the construction of partial
subgrade parking in support of a hotel. Block B will undergo approximately 85,000 CY of cut
excavation for the construction of subgrade parking in support of apartment units. New concrete
foundations and footers will be constructed, as well as a private drive for the retail corridor.
Landscaping and street lights will be designed and placed around each building, with trees
planted along the east side of the apartment complex.
On Block A, a six story hotel and one floor of associated partial subgrade parking will be
constructed. The lower subgrade story consisting of only parking, with the upper of the two
consisting of parking and areas to support the management of the hotel. The ground level will
consist of the lobby and meal area. Floors two through six will consist of living areas with
approximately 37 hotel rooms on each floor. The plans include approximately 185 hotel rooms in
total.
On Block B, a six story apartment building and two floors of associated subgrade parking will be
constructed. The two subgrade floors will consist entirely of parking space. The ground level will
consist of some parking to the southeast, retail space along the west and north, and residential
townhomes along the northeast portion of Block B. There will be apartments in the areas above
the retail spaces. Floors two through six will consist of apartment units along the outer edges of
the proposed building with some open air space in the center of the proposed building. There
will be approximately 650 apartment units in total.
The Phase I Block A and B plans will result in approximately 90,555 sq. ft. of retail space, 77,285
sq. ft. of hotel space, 624,775 sq. ft. of residential space, 30,935 sq. ft. of roof amenity, and
424,450 sq. ft. of parking space. 'FINAL PARKING SQ FOOTAGE MAY VARY HAVE DUE TO
EMP Version 2, June 2018

POTENTIAL CHANGES ASSOCIATED VALUE ENGINEERING ON BLOCK A***
The additional phases, beyond Phase I, have not been scheduled at this time.
4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
N Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
N If Yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.
5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
N Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
N If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.
6) Which category of risk -based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
N Residential ❑ Non -Residential or Industrial/Commercial
7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 1/1/2021
b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
One Year
c) Additional phases planned? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date. Yes, additional phases are planned, but not scheduled at this time. If required an
amended/updated EMP will be submitted for Phase II, and for future phases, if there are
significant changes in redevelopment & utility plans from Phase I.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Start Date: Planned to follow Phase I completion sometime in 2021. Notification of start of
additional phases will be provided to DEQ. If substantial changes to Phase II plans are made the
EMP will need to be amended/updated.
Planned Activity:
Phase II redevelopment is not included in this EMP.
6
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Start Date: Unknown
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: Early 2022
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Propert
Part 1. Soil: ..............................................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater: ............................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water: ..........................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment: ...................................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ..................................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
Part 6. Sub -Slab Soil Vapor: ..................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air: ...................................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.
PART 1. Soil — Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Semi -Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) and RCRA-8
Metals
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Soil thickness above the inferred soil to groundwater interface is approximately 17 to 35 feet
based upon historical depth to water measurements reported in monitoring wells identified as
GW-4 and GW-2 and during in -situ soil sampling assumed depths to groundwater.
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
Block A will have approximately 46,500 sq. ft. of total disturbed area including resurfacing,
constructing new building foundations, and landscape initiatives. Removed bushes, hedges,
and/or trees will be required to have residual soil removed from their root structures via
mechanical means such as tumblers or shakers, if necessary, to dislodge soil material from
organic debris prior to disposal offsite.
Block B will have approximately 132,600 sq. ft. of total disturbed area including resurfacing,
7
EMP Version 2, June 2018

constructing new building foundations, and landscaping initiatives. Removed bushes, hedges,
and/or trees will be required to have residual soil removed from their root structures via
mechanical means such as tumblers or shakers, if necessary, to dislodge soil material from
organic debris prior to disposal offsite.
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
Excavation required for subgrade parking and utility updates will be a minimum of 5 feet deep
and a maximum of 35 feet deep depending on the existing elevations of the ground surface.
Excavation required for repaving will be a maximum of approximately 5 feet deep.
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
Approximately 21,000 cubic yards of soil will be excavated from Block A in support of subgrade
parking. Approximately 85,000 cubic yards of soil will be excavated from Block B in support of
subgrade parking. A total of approximately 106,000 cubic yards of soil will be excavated. See
attached renovation plans.
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
1,600 cubic yards
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
1,600 cubic yards
Part I.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminarydata available).
1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ❑Yes ®No
❑ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Click or tap here to ente ` -
❑ If yes, do the soils exceed the "Contained -Out" levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained -In Policy? ................................................. ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED -OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED -IN POLICYTHE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
EMP Version 2, June 2018

REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE? .................................... ❑ Yes ® No
❑ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
❑ Ignitability _lick or tap here to enter text.
❑ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Toxicity ick or tap here to enter text.
❑ TCLP results slick or tap here to enter text.
❑ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
Click oI Ldp I ICI I. LU enter text.
® If no, explain rationale:
Soil vapor results have not indicated the presence of an onsite soil source, but
instead a groundwater source. Additionally, the site's recognized environmental
conditions have been primarily reported to be associated with documented
offsite sources.
Extensive in -situ soil testing completed on the Blocks A and B included 54
borings spread out across the property. Results of the samples collected from
these borings at five foot depth intervals did not report concentrations of
constituents that would constitute a characteristic waste determination.
d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAYNOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
® Preliminary Health -Based Residential SRGs
® Preliminary Health -Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
® Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
❑ Site -specific risk -based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Click or tap here to enter text.
Additional comments:
Click or tap here to enter text.
9
EMP Version 2, June 2018

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
® Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
® Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known
❑ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
Click or tap here to enter text.
® Manage soil under impervious cap ® or clean fill
® Describe cap or fill:
If contaminated soil is encountered and reused onsite, it will either be:
1.) Located underneath asphalt/concrete parking and/or drive areas; or,
2.) Placed below two (2) feet of demonstrably clean fill cap material.
It will not be placed below potential future structures built for occupancy.
® Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re -recorded if
actions are Post -Recordation).
® GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
❑ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:
Click or tap here to ent— i-
4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
® Yes, describe the method will include:
Based upon current redevelopment plans and previous in -situ sampling results, significant
areas of contaminated soil are not expected to be encountered or disturbed during the
construction period. If required, an amended/updated EMP will be prepared for the future
planned phases. If applicable, grading contractor will take into account conditions such as
wind speed, wind direction, and moisture content of soil during soil grading and stockpiling
activities to minimize dust generation. In the unlikely event that contaminated soil is
encountered during Site redevelopment that requires excavation, particular attention will
be paid by contractors to implement dust control measures as needed based on Site and
atmospheric conditions (i.e. by controlled water application, hydro -seeding, and/or mulch,
stone, or plastic cover). Potentially impacted soil will be managed as described below.
❑ No, explain rationale:
.lick or tap here to enter text.
10
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Field Screening of site soil
® Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
During soil disturbance at the Site ECS will conduct an initial visit. Subsequently the
workers or contractors will observe soils for evidence of potential significantly impacted
soil not initially discovered during in -situ testing and will contact ECS if evidence of
potential significantly impacted soil including a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or
non-native fill or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e. chemicals, tanks, drums,
etc.) are observed. On an occurrence type basis, should the above be noted during Site
work, the contractor will contact ECS to observe the suspect condition and conduct field
screening for volatile organic vapors using a PID, FID, or similar device. If ECS confirms that
the material may be impacted, then the procedures below will be implemented. In
addition, ECS will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager to advise that person of
the condition.
❑ No, explain rationale:
Soil Sample Collection
® Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in -situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
If suspected soil impact that was not previously discovered during extensive in -situ soil
testing assessment is encountered during excavation or installation or removal of utilities,
excavation will proceed only as far as needed to allow alternate corrective measures
described below.
Suspect impacted soil encountered during excavation may be stockpiled and covered in a
secure area to allow construction to progress. Stockpiling must be conducted in a manner
consistent with the guidance provided herein as Figure 1. If soil stockpiling occurs outside
of the extent previously sampled during the in -situ sampling event and samples are
required, the stockpile will be gridded off in approximately 1,000 cubic yard (CY) cells,
unless an alternative volume is approved by the Program, for the collection of
approximately one 5 point composite sample for every 1,000 CY and, unless a reduced
sampling frequency is approved by the Program, in general accordance with the January
2020 Inactive hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup of
Contaminated Sites.
Construction debris such as asphalt and concrete will be segregated from soil and
disposed of as construction debris. This debris will be required to shaken, tumbled, etc. if
necessary in order to ensure no soil is adhered to the construction debris prior to
disposal.
❑ No, explain rationale:
11
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Click or tap here to enter text.
If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 6020 & 7471B
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
® Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
If detections indicate a potential for the soil to be hazardous, TCLP analysis will be
utilized. If RCRA metals are analyzed, the sample exhibiting the highest reported
concentration of total chromium will be analyzed for hexavalent chromium by EPA
Method 7199 while additional sample volumes are held pending receipt of the
analytical results. If the sample analyzed for Cr VI reports a concentration of Cr VI
in exceedance of its respective Residential PSRG, the remainder of the soil samples
shall be analyzed for Cr VI. If the laboratory analytical results of the sample
analyzed for Cr VI reports concentrations of Cr VI below its respective Residential
PSRG, it is reasonable to assume that other samples would not exceed Cr VI's
Residential PSRG standard.
® Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:
Click or tap here to enter text.
® Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (Check all thatapply):
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 6020
12
EMP Version 2, June 2018

❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
.. __ here to Pry..-+. '
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
iicK or tap nere to enter texL
® Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
If detections indicate a potential for the soil to be hazardous, TCLP analysis will
be utilized. If RCRA metals are analyzed, unless otherwise approved by the
Program, hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199 will also be analyzed.
Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, a work plan for
final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
(ACK or tap nere to enter text,
® If final grade sampling was NOT selected please explain rationale:
Final grade sampling will be required for areas not covered by building foundations or
impervious surfaces. Following completion of soil disturbance for any future Site
development (i.e. after grading and building construction), an environmental professional
will be contacted to assess the Site for areas that are not covered with a minimum of 2
feet of demonstrably clean fill soil or topsoil from a landscaping company, building
foundations, sidewalks, or asphalt or concrete parking areas, driveways or other
impervious surfaces. If such areas exist and are outside of the extent of previous in -situ soil
sampling efforts, a Work Plan will be prepared for final grade sampling for DEQ review and
approval. If no such area exist, documentation will be provided to the NCDEQ.
Part I.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL
NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, "Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner."
Requirements for importing fill:
1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ................
13
EMP Version 2, June 2018
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown

2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
N/A
3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (if a range
of depths, please list the range.)
N/A
4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
If import is needed, for permitted locations on the Division of Energy, Mines, and Land Resources
(DEMLR) list, one soil sample will need to be collected from the approximate area of the quarry
from where the soil material is to be cut from for import to the site. That soil sample will be
required to be collected in accordance with the methods and analyses described immediately
below in this Section's item 5).
5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use atthe Brownfields property.
Sampling protocol of one composite soil sample, except for VOCs which will be grab samples,
collected for approximately every 1,000 cubic yards of imported soil fill will be conducted
following NCDEQ approval of the work plan. ABC stone, 57 stone, and fines from crushed rock
will not require analysis as long as it is documented to the NCDEQ that it is new material and not
mixed with recycled material brought into the quarry.
IF REQUIRED, and in lieu of a separate work plan, soil sampling will occur from representative
areas of a selected DEMLR permitted facility (borrow pit) for NCDEQ approval prior to importing
to the site. The soil will be stockpiled at the borrow pit, or that area of the borrow pit from
where the cuts for import to the site are to occur, will be sited prior to mobilization by ECS to
perform the sampling. Each representative composite sample collected will be comprised of five
individual grab soil samples collected in re -sealable bags from various locations of the borrow
pit's stockpiled/sited soil to be imported to the project site. Each individual sample will be
duplicated and then one of the two re -sealable bags screened using a photoionization detector
(PID) for volatile vapors. The individual grab soil sample with the highest PID reading will have its
duplicate re -sealable bag appropriately packaged and submitted to a North Carolina certified
laboratory to be analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method 8260. Subsequently, each of the other
grab soil samples will be gently mixed together and one composite soil sample will be submitted
for analysis by EPA Method 8270 for SVOCs, total RCRA 8-metals using EPA Method 6020, and for
hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199. If the borrow source selected is not a DEMLR
permitted facility, then the sampling frequency for the above listed parameters shall be one for
every 500 CY of soil to be imported.
6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
14
EMP Version 2, June 2018

® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 6020 and 7471B
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
® Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199
7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in -situ
borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought
onto the Brownfields Property.
Virgin soil, ABC stone, 57 stone, and fines from crushed stone from a NCDEQ approved quarry, if
necessary.
Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL
NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.
1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.
Approximately 106,000 total cubic yards of soil excavated during construction will need to be
exported for proper disposal. In Block A, approximately 21,000 cubic yards of soil ranging from
zero to 20 feet in depth will be exported from the site. In Block B, approximately 85,000 cubic
yards of soil ranging from zero to thirty-five feet in depth will be exported from the site. To
determine the contents of the soil, an approved, in-depth in -situ soil testing work plan for Block
A and Block B was completed.
Based on this in -situ assessment findings, limited and low-level detections of VOCs, SVOCs,
and detections of arsenic, indicative of naturally occurring background concentrations were
15
EMP Version 2, June 2018

reported. The soil is not expected to pose an unacceptable risk associated with
redevelopment of the Block A or Block B portions of the Seaboard Station site with the
potential exception of the following:
➢ Soil in Block B composited from boring locations B-1, B-2, and B-3 from 10 to 15 feet
bgs in the Cell identified as Area 1 from which the horizontal composite sample
identified as B1-3 indicated a reported detection of Cr VI above Residential PSRGs. Soil
that has exhibited concentrations of hexavalent chromium in exceedance of its
respective PSRG will not be transported to a receiving site until approval from the
Program has been granted.
Based on the thoroughness of the sampling protocol and the relative absence of reported soil
impact, ECS believes that excess fill from grading and construction activities may be beneficially re-
used at NCDEQ approved off -site commercial/industrial locations, other brownfields sites, and
municipal solid waste (MSW), construction/demolition (C&D), or land clearing/inert debris (LCID)
landfills.
2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
® Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
® Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting Landfill;
® Landfarm or other treatment facility
® Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property — determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and that record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
® Use as Beneficial Fill off -site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.
3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).
Soil will be transported to the most appropriate type of facility based upon prior testing results
and Brownfields program manager approval. These test results have been addressed through a
Brownfields approved work plan prior to assessment.
Generally, and in accordance with NCDEQ Brownfields Program approved Work Plans for export
projects of this size, soil samples are collected from export soil at a rate of one sample per every
approximate 2,000 CY or less of export.
16
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
❑ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)
® Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original
depth from which it was excavated.
❑ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
❑ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials:
® If no, include rationale here:
Impacted soil is not anticipated to be encountered.
Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
If the contractor/workers encounters suspected impacted soil based upon staining or odors that have
not already been analyzed by a laboratory during previous in -situ soil sampling activities, they will
contact ECS. ECS will mobilize to the site to observe, document, and field screen with a PID prior to
placing it back into the trenches as fill at the approximate depths from which they were removed.
Soil that cannot go back into the trench, will be used as beneficial fill on site or be disposed of at a
Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (MSWLF). Prior to soil re -use onsite, and if the contents have
not been determined via previous in -situ soil sampling, representative sampling will need to occur in
accordance with this EMP's Section 1.B.6; this will also be dependent on soil placement i.e. under
asphalt (impervious surface) vs. exposed soils.
PART 2. GROUNDWATER — Please fill out the information below.
1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
Soil thickness above the inferred soil to groundwater interface is approximately 17 to 35 feet
based upon historical depth to water measurements reported in monitoring wells identified as
GW-4 and GW-2 and during in -situ soil sampling assumed depths to groundwater.
2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ❑onsite ❑offsite ®both or ❑unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
Potential Historical Onsite Source(s):
1.) A groundwater sampling event conducted by ECS on February 5, 2020 reported groundwater
17
EMP Version 2, June 2018

as having detected concentrations of chlorinated solvents tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and
trichloroethylene (TCE) greater than the North Carolina groundwater quality 2L standards
(NC2LGWQS); and
2.) The former B.J.T., Inc. property, located at 10 W. Franklin Street (Adjacent to the Phase I
Redevelopment Area) had a 10,000-gallon UST that was installed in 1972 and removed in
1990. No UST Closure Report was available for the former UST.
Potential Offsite Source(s):
Several properties within the minimum ASTM search distances were identified in a Phase I ESA
Report prepared by ECS and dated October 3, 2018 including:
Flints Laundry and Dry Cleaning, located approximately 1,000 feet south and upgradient from
the subject property participates in the North Carolina Dry Cleaning Solvent Clean Up Act
(NCDSCA) program. A Hart & Hickman Monitoring Report dated October 27, 2016 reported that
MW-7, associated with the chlorinated solvent plume from Flints Laundry, is located on the
subject property. MW-10, also associated with the chlorinated solvent plume from Flints
Laundry, is located just outside of the subject property to the northeast. In September 2016,
Hart & Hickman collected groundwater samples from MW-7 and MW-10 that resulted in
concentrations of PCE and TCE above the DSCA Tier 1 Risk Based Screening Levels (RSBLs).
A building on a nearby property at 804 Semart Drive was reported to have at least one
unregistered UST, according to a March 25, 2004 Limited Site Assessment Report by GeoLogix. A
UST closure report was not available and the USTs may still exist. Laboratory analysis reported
concentrations of benzene and ethylbenzene of at least ten times above the NC2LGWQS.
A No Further Action (NFA) letter with a Notice of Residual Petroleum (NORP) was issued by the
NCDEQ on October 19, 2004; and
3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
The topography of the property and general surface water flow grades gently downward toward
the north/northwest. Shallow groundwater as reported in previous assessments conducted
indicates flow is to the north/northwest in the site vicinity.
4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, describe these activities:
According to field observations obtained during the previous in -situ soil sampling event,
groundwater may be encountered during excavation activities performed on Block B, although it
is unlikely. A City of Raleigh Industrial User Permit Application Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTW) general permit has been applied for and regulatory considerations regarding the
potential need for dewatering are underway to prevent potential delays during redevelopment.
If required, in accordance with the permit, pre -discharge samples for laboratory analysis will be
collected from temporary on -site containment vessels. A connection from the containment
18
EMP Version 2, June 2018

vessel to the nearest city sewer discharge point would be installed with temporary hosing to
facilitate discharge.
Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered
during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent
management of groundwater (e.g., dewateringof groundwater from excavations or
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or
sampling procedures).
If groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities, appropriate worker safety
measures will be undertaken and groundwater will be allowed to re -infiltrate for approximately
24 hours (if it does not affect the construction schedule). If accumulated water remains,
samples of the accumulated water will be collected and analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA 8-
metals to determine if contaminants are present. Accumulated water that contains
contaminants above NCAC 2B Surface Water Standards will be containerized and disposed at an
off -site permitted facility in accordance with regulatory requirements. Accumulated water that
does not contain contaminants above NCAC 2B Surface Water Standards will be managed on
the site by allowing to re -infiltrate to the ground or discharged to the storm sewer in
accordance with municipal, state and federal requirements.
5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property? ................. ❑X Yes ❑ No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................OYes ❑No
6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
® Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program's intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
® Location of existing monitoring wells marked
® Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
® Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.
7) Please provide additional details as needed:
NCDSCA site Flints Laundry and Dry Cleaning has monitoring well identified as MW-7 is located on the
property. The monitoring wells are associated with the ongoing monitoring of the Flint Laundry and
Dry Cleaning (NCDEQ DSCA Site #DC920046). These wells will be properly abandoned in accordance
with applicable regulations and relocated and reinstalled at another location. Avoiding disturbance is
not feasible as they are inside of the disturbance area.
These wells will be required to be abandoned and then reinstalled per the Inactive Hazardous Site
Branch (IHSB).
19
EMP Version 2, June 2018

NCDSCA (Flints Laundry and Dry Cleaning — DC920046) — Contact: Mike Cunningham, Raleigh, NC
27603 PH [phone]
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.
PART 3. SURFACE WATER -Please fill out the information below.
1) Is surface water present at the property? ❑ Yes ® No
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ❑ Yes ® No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ® No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
If contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities, appropriate
worker safety measures will be undertaken. Surface water/precipitation which enters an open
excavation will be allowed to infiltrate for approximately 24 hours (if it does not affect the
construction schedule). If accumulated water remains, samples of the accumulated water will be
collected and analyzed for VOCs to determine if contaminants are present. Accumulated water
that contains contaminants above NCAC 2B Surface Water Standards will be containerized and
disposed at an off -site permitted facility in accordance with regulatory requirements.
Accumulated water that does not contain contaminants above NCAC 2B Surface Water Standards
will be managed on the site or discharged to the storm sewer in accordance with municipal, state
and federal requirements.
PART 4. SEDIMENT — Please fill out the information below.
1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ❑ Yes ® No
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ❑ Yes ® No
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ® No
4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.
20
EMP Version 2, June 2018

5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
Not Applicable
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR — Please fill out the information below.
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:...........® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Groundwater:.....® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:...........® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Groundwater:.....® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?
Soil vapor is known to be contaminated at concentrations exceeding residential regulatory standards
at 1-2 feet below ground surface on Block A and also at approximately 23 feet below ground surface
on Block A, which is within five feet of the water table.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities
(trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management
of such contact:
If contaminated soil vapor is encountered or ventilation is warranted, work in the vicinity will be
halted, the NCDEQ will be notified and additional assessment will be discussed with Brownfields.
PART 6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR — Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.
1) Are sub -slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
2) If data indicate that sub -slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map
showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub -slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ®0-6 inches ❑Other, please
describe:
21
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Sub -slab soil vapor sample identified as SG-11 was collected from the former Sunflower Cafe on
Block A. Tetrachloroethylene in SG-11 was reported to be in excess of the 2017 Residential VISLs;
however, concentrations were below Non -Residential VISLs.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub -slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ❑ No M Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
If contaminated soil vapor is encountered or ventilation is warranted, work in the vicinity will be
halted, the NCDEQ will be notified and additional assessment will be discussed with Brownfields.
PART 7. INDOOR AIR — Please fill out the information below.
1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes M No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk -based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes M No ❑ Unknown
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:
Indoor air quality data is unknown to exist for the site.
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM — Please fill out the information below.
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
M Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
If yes, ❑ VIMS Plan Attached or M VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
A VIMS design in accordance with the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality's
Brownfields Program Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System Design Submittal New Construction
Minimum Requirements Checklist will be submitted at a later date (to be determined).
VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer
If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
UICK or tap nere to enter tex
22
EMP Version 2, June 2018

CONTINGENCY PLAN —encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials
In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, orother waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.
Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site -specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.
Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
EPA Method 6020 and 7471B.
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
�ucic ur Lap nere w enLer LVXL
® Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199
Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
Unforeseen conditions will be handled on a case by case basis. If encountered the contractor shall
notify ECS who will advise the Brownfields Program. The Brownfields Program will be notified in
accordance with the Notifications page. Soil and/or ponded groundwater samples will be collected
in accordance with applicable regulations.
Underground Storage Tanks:
USTs will be removed and transported offsite for disposal following evacuation of residual liquids
with a vacuum truck and receipt of a permit by the Wake County Fire Marshall. Residual liquids will
be disposed of properly at an approved offsite waste water treatment facility. If the UST cannot be
removed, Brownfields approval will be obtained prior to its abandonment in place.
23
EMP Version 2, June 2018

If impacted soil is encountered it will be managed in accordance with this EMP's Part 1.A. Managing
On Site Soil above.
UST closure samples will be collected in accordance with applicable NCDEQ UST Section guidance.
Sub -Grade Feature/Pit:
If outside of the extent of previous in -situ soil testing, or if impacts not previously encountered
exist, soil samples will be collected for VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270,
RCRA 8-Metals by EPA Method 6020, and Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199 for every 20
linear feet. If ponded groundwater is encountered, then ponded groundwater samples will be
collected from the sub -grade feature/pit for VOCs by EPA Method 8260 and for SVOCs by EPA
Method 8270.
If encountered these features will be attempted to be removed if feasible. If unable to be physically
removed due to redevelopment plans, current site structure, and/or economic feasibility purposes,
they shall be tested and documented to the satisfaction of the Brownfields Program for future
placement on the Brownfields Plat.
Buried Waste Material:
Soil samples will be collected for VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, RCRA 8-
Metals by EPA Method 6020, and Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199 for every 250 cubic
yards of waste material affected soil. Waste would be handled separately from potential waste
affected soil as it will not be allowed to be reburied on site.
Re -Use of Impacted Soils On -Site:
Although not anticipated, if soils that are outside of the extent of previous in -situ soil testing efforts
are to be reused on -site, soil samples will be collected for VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA
Method 8270, RCRA 8-Metals by EPA Method 6020, and Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method
7199 and managed in accordance with this EMP's Part 1.A. Managing On Site Soil above.
If unknown, impacted soil is identified on -site, management on -site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on -site.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
Ui LdP i lure to enter text.
POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
24
EMP Version 2, June 2018

® Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 1/31/2021
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment -related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).
X❑ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site's Brownfields Agreement.
25
EMP Version 2, June 2018

APPROVAL SIGNATURES
Brownfields Project Number: 22075-18-092
Brownfields Project Name: Seaboard Station
October 8, 2020
Prospective Developer: Seaboard Station Joint Ven, �{iA�I,A Date Click or tap to enter a date.
Printed Name/Title/Company: Mark Dorigan,P ntCA {�''•.•
a� ' rw.w...,,•� 1 0 • •j
0
ram= •'+
Consultant: ECS S .0 east, LLP n bate Click or tap to enter a date.
Printed Name/Title/Company: Scott M. W
.OL O G;: G� o••
Brownfields Project Manager: Brad Atkinson
26
EMP Version 2, June 2018
10.9.2020
Date Click or tap to enter a date.

Figure 1
NCBP Diagram for Temporary
Containment of Impacted or Potentially
Impacted Soil
Cross -Section View
Top Plastic Cover Sheeting: Underliner: 1 layer, minimum of 10
(1 Layer, minimum: 10 mil thick) mil thick plastic
Berm
(Straw bales, Weight
composted earth, etc.) (If plastic
cover used)
Land Contaminated Soils
Surface
\ z 11 F
Straw Bale Berm
Map View
' ■ El ■ ght
�ZzNj
■ Contaminated Soils I ■
■
o Plastic
Sheeting
Note: Adapted from NC DEQ UST Section "Guidelines for Ex Situ Petroleum Contaminated Soil Remediation" dated December, 1, 2013
27
EMP Version 2, June 2018

rn
Q 04 N
M NN N
-----------
Cl) M N N N M N
NO N N P- N �O 'AN N (O O 00
LL
________________________
O
04
00 O N N O N In N
M O N N N N N N Vl Y
O
`_ - `----------_ \ N _______N_nl_�f1 ____(�1- -_O- (D- G
N N O� C4 izz
N M O O 04 .N N a
(M M O _ N D N
------------------------ '_
\ Z
N �
N
LL O 0
O
- _----_�_ _____________________________________
Z N N N N
CV '__________ ________�____'_____ -_O _O O N _O------ N ________________________________________
N- -------------p�
Q N O O
_____________
N N - • - N C.
(n • N O _ 0 0 N O O
________________________________
S O O O 00 N-.
CT
1 U m
0 U
a
CD
� N \_ O O ________________________________________.
O)
O O N N
Z O) m
- - - * -O -------------'----- • '------- ----------------- '-----------
------------
---------- _____________________________________
O
N
S
s (n 00 f� N N f� In (O (O (O N In (O (O M 00 •� •.
N O z N 0 0 N O O N N OO OO (M N N O N N O p N N
N N N N N (n O (n (O (O
lL
O O O O O O O O - N N N N N N N N
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
N 00 (N N n N N f�N N O N
zz O O O O \ W N OO N O O N N N O OO
+� 00 N � Cl)n N M N O O O N M M f� In Q
Un 0 0 0 O 01010 0 O 0 0 O O O O O O O
co 3 0 0 0 00 LO O O O O O O (D (D O f� M O O D O O M O) f� � y"r
0 0 N M N 00 f� 'n ('M 1 w 00 M (() N +�+ U
Z
07
W o R
IL
U U
z O 0
U U U cn
w w w
J Z Z
H
J m � U oiS at3
W
D Y O H >
<) LL J Z Z_
H m O H W W Y Q Y ¢
lA m fA U L m O w U m H w U H
O O Y � U� U W
W z J O cnO OW m V
w mz UmO z0w Czo ow =
mLL nw o a
O0 zz U U O?� U O 7 UWz a o~ UpOaJ
W W J J W Z H U` J U� H H Z ?> H H H Z H H H
a U Z 0 0 w z 0 z �s U Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z U
U O ¢ w O U F z w w} O w w w} w w w W
d U)i O~ a w w w u~i Q ~ w p w z O 0
Z z U [l U • 0 0 U J W = O U (A (A W z (A (A (A w (A (A (q N
O W C7 C7 U` C7 [Y Z O 0 U U f] w w W W w w w w w w
Z O m
Z U d Z W Z Z Z Q J¢ W J J • Q W W Z W
H W O Y O O S101,
J1cFF0�%0U .0 U J¢ J¢ Z¢ HH H d H H H LL t`o2J zmZ m''''w 0 0 0 uJ uJ Q U U, O J 00 0 0 0 0 0 (0U J O (� Z m U mun
m U LL U (n LL W UU Z U Z Z Z m N
p m m U Q 5
Z" • c 2 W 0 N O JLIZ-0
Z Z W U Z (�
U U H H U Q UU) U OU N N (� D (� U 0-zaaZ0- (ALL(n mmmmmwwm0-wwz0zzz�

I VE 1
CiD
f�
IE 00
0 0,�
m
W PEACE
1 P" `at l i
1 HE [y�F�" SST ` "` v
E'HITAKER MILL RD
o�' CEO
rOw'N
�- -
y� � G R1?
F
ati �zyo fit
t�VIS � �5a
j 'c
a
r
L
- 401 y —one uvy
'
GLASCOCK ST
mt-�
70
�f
SASSER STD
401
a
a
HOLDEN ST1
yam,
E FRANK Nzi
Ln
3
.0
N BaUNQARY--ST Fp-
>z E Oakwood Cem {
L7
Q y
Z '`S 0 .. YW OD AVE
� � f J ❑
2' E qp
Lu
E. EDENT0r1 s SITE a
h�V I \—INEW� BERN AVER
N 1 FIGURE 1
L SOURCE: SITE TOPOGRAPHIC LOCATION
L USGS MAP:
RALEIGH WEST, NC
2019 SEABOARD STATION
RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NC
SCALE 1:24,000 BROWNFIELDS # 22075-18-092
TM ECS PROJECT: 49:4841-G

,.�.. ; c"
:i. IL
!� 1-
r
s`
5
10 W. FRANKLIN
;+
.�
BLOCK A�-
N
�F
s SOURCE:
WAKE COUNTY GIS
AERIAL PHOTO DATE: 2018
Q 55 113 22Q R
802 SEMART F`
BLOCK B
FIGURE 2
BROWNFIELD PARCEL LOCATION
MAP:
SEABOARD STATION
RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NC
BROWNFIELDS # 22075-18-092
ECS PROJECT NO 49:4841-G

Iwo
N
�e
S
SOURCE:
GOOGLE EARTH AERIAL
PUBLISHED: 2015
NOT TO SCALE
N
�a
■
u
i
o
0
00
J
Z
0
Q O
O
Q
QU)
2
}
0
(7
J
Z
a-
0
ZO
O
W
=
�z
Q
Q
00
O
U
�
�
Q
J
W
J
_
C)
L
W
W
O
0
N
0Lu
z
U
m
�
W ti
00
U� o
J
Z
Z
w N
�Q
O
J z
Z
N
00
Z
0�
m
Lu
N
�
U
0
00
00
m
X
W
o
o
W
Z
J
W
°� N
w
O
Hopes
Q
U
w
X
Z
O0°
0
�
jw
a
Q
00
a�0
w�
Qmz
Q
o�
Zm
FIGURE 3
HISTORICAL SAMPLE LOCATION
MAP
SEABOARD
STATION
RALEIGH, WAKE
COUNTY, NC
BROWNFIELDS
# 22075-18-092
ECS PROJECT NO 49:4841-G

11
GW-4 / GW-DUP
2
ri.IL
B-15 ?�
1 SG"3 :tee
-
}":
W. FRANKLIN ST.
lIk*F SB-5-1 /SB-5-2 -,
SG 88 ' SG-7 F SG-6 * ^�
16.
Q i' ❑ "� SG-5
X
Q
5
LL
0
F— rt I z SB-6-1 / SB-6-2 / SB-
SG ;4.
� •� � SG-1 `�`� s
w ❑ 1
MW-7 .
--.I
t ANC*d' SEABOARD AVE.r
4 SG-10
PEACE ST.
N
�F
s SOURCE:
WAKE COUNTY GIS
AERIAL PHOTO DATE: 2018
Q 55 113 220 R
FIGURE 4
HISTORICAL LOCATION MAP:
SEABOARD STATION
RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NC
BROWNFIELDS # 22075-18-092
ECS PROJECT NO 49:4841-G

t.
p Ph
Q A-1
A-10 ti
A-2 1A-0
7
0 4ft
•' J�w
IV";_
N
SOURCE:
NC CGIA, MICROSOFT
AERIAL PHOTO DATE: 2018
FIGURE 5
IN -SITU SAMPLE BORING
LOCATION MAP
(BLOCK A):
SEABOARD STATION
RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NC
BROWNFIELDS # 22075-18-092
ECS PROJECT NO 49:4841-G

7
rt
- _ Iio
�r
B-5
B-7
B-2
•• B-8
B-1 B-6
B-10 B 11
B-3 B-14
B-13
-
B-16 r•+• B_15
B-17 B-20
T JJ; j B-19 B-23
� m B-18 am
B-21 B-22 r
B-24
B-25 B-28
B-30
4
t �
B-35
B-39 .
B-26 -
B-34 r
WAZ
UIL
fir
Boring Locations -
Cell Borders I
Proposed Building Border Each Area = —6,000 CY
FIGURE 6
we
SOURCE: IN -SITU SAMPLE BORING
S LOCATION MAP (BLOCK B):
WAKE COUNTY GIS SEABOARD STATION -BLOCK B
AERIAL PHOTO DATE: 2018EKS RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NC
BROWNFIELDS # 22075-18-092
Q 55 „0 22Uft ECS PROJECT NO 49:4841-G
f•� I

1
-
tij
i 6 '
Li
M
s
s
i k■I
FIGURE 7
SOURCE: PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT
AND CURRENT EXTENT OF PCE
NC CGIA, MICROSOFT GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
AERIAL PHOTO DATE: 2018 ra
SEABOARD STATION
RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NC
I M BROWNFIELDS # 22075-18-092
ECS PROJECT NO 49:4841-G

I
OAKCHASELANE
-oil
' I❑ N I ry "Y 'Y� � � MW-13� R II I®I
(28T32) I WS`W-3
/ I
/ 2S. 4 — —
(zsa.55) I I i HAYNES STREET
I
I I I I I
I
I
I
M W-1
' I (28d.7U)
I ' _I 1WSW-
cm
'NMw-11
(296.04— �
C
m
IQ—
/ p 0
� I
MW-12
/ (zsd.as)
I
I I I
I
O I W
�O
MW-7 p I
(zslsa)_ , y I
SEABOARDAVENUE R
LL I M
MW-9
N
290.18)
3
2 �
(3U1.23) �
I
N
WES PEACESTREET _
I
I I 296.90) _
J I , O MVil1& ----
J I �ASPHA � � ; I
� \ I
I •Y I I INS -1 O 1
I c �
^Ab- I PARKING MW'2
GARAGE MW-19(29492)
/ —
J I ARCEDALE
MW-5 BUILDING
(297.46) 1
A2 1
I / (29343) I ) 11
A 1
I I MW E
/ ' (30323)
� � I
296 \ I ~ I BURES IOLD NG �FORN
PARKINLI
ES
I \ G LAUNDRY REVENUE I L
II 1 O GARAGE, \ h 1 BUILDING 2 _ POLK STREET — — — —
� 1 SUBSORFACE I �
m PARKING Z I—
\ MW 2& GARAGE
I \\ ❑ 1 2 I `GRASS I (I $MOw, .-1
MW-18 (30544)
PARKING
I
O--
-
GARAGE MW 15 —
/ \ I303-92)
LE END IIJV\
SOURCE PROPERTY BOUNDARY GROUNDWATER GRADIENT MAP
N
P(AUGUST 2016)
PROPERTY LINE
RAILROAD TRACKS FLINT'S LAUNDRY AND DRY CLEANING
APPROXIMATE DSCA ID: DC920046
TYPE II MONITORING WELL 0 200 400
430 N. SALISBURY ST.
TYPE III MONITORING WELL SCALE IN FEET RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY
® WATER SUPPLY WELL 2923 South Tryon Sneet-Spire 100
hart'. hickman Chazlotre, N.Uh C—a. 28203
(303.92) GROUNDWATER ELEVATION (FT MSL) • 704586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f
NOTES ydAR1IX BFMI, F M.- 60WI10M License # C-1269 / #C-N5 G-1.gy
300 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOUR (FT MSL) 1 MONITORING WELLS GAUGED ON 8122/16 DATE. 1 0-27-1 6 REVISION NO. 0
ESTIMATED GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION 2. MONITORING WELLS M— MW-11, AND MW-14 ARE
COMPLETED IN BEDROCK. JOB NO. DSO-67 ATTACHMENT NO. 4

I
OAKCHASELAyNE
❑a ! pp �_- W13 -
I
6.0772 I I i� WSW-3 I
�\ I
I I <0. p100 1 ' I `yI \HAYNES STREET
I I I I
I I I I \ 1
I /
r —SW- I
I / I '000j
I r I I I \
z
_MW-11�
IoW i - 0.00208 �
IQ I I 1 p I
0.0007
I / �
I I I I
I I I I I
I -
I /
I I I I~ I I Ir
MW-7
SEAB ARDAVENUE x I
\ _ I
MW-9
g
WES PEACE STR ET
M IN
J I j \ GO ¢O I MW14O/
`ASPHALT D: ;
� I d 1 I
® \ I n
I I WSW
I m
I I ❑ I // �MW-3 -\ \\ o
I
MIN 2
W
I I I GARAGE � M-19 �
/
J I ARCHDALE
MW-5 BUILDING
M�2 I 0.0227
L � I
1 / i 1 II
1 I I
W_g
0.145
I❑
1 I DORES RIMER h II I I,
W BUIRIMERLDING FLINT'S
PARKING \ I LAUNDRY EVENUE 1
II I GARAGE 1 ? 1 BUILDING 2 POLK STREET — - - —
1 \ 'U6SIJRFACF I I--
// m l \J PARY.I NG
_. lPl III
LEGEND
— - - — SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
- - - PROPERTY LINE
RAILROAD TRACKS
TYPE II MONITORING WELL
0 TYPE III MONITORING WELL
® WATER SUPPLY WELL
0.145 PCE CONCENTRATION IN ITI
0.07 PCE ISOCONTOUR LINE IN mg/L
(DASHED WHERE INFERRED)
IG \1
I I MW-18
...��� I
3E � �
MW-15
I
iJ
GROUNDWATER PCE ISOCONCENTRATION MAP
(SEPTEMBER 2016)
FLINT'S LAUNDRY AND DRY CLEANING
APPROXIMATE
DSCA ID: DC920046
0
200 400
430 N. SALISBURY ST.
SCALE IN FEET
RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY
hart hickman
Chazl. N.Uh Carolina 282030
O
704586-0007(p) 704586-0373(f
NOTES
SIAMIR BIV�MN.EIIfAL SOWIIONS License # C-1269 / #C-N5 Gedogy
1. SAMPLES COLLECTED USING PASSIVE DIFFUSION BAGS DEPLOYED ON 8122/16
AND RETRIEVED ON 916/16.
DATE: 10-27-16
REVISION NO. 0
2. HISTORICAL DATA CONSIDERED IN CONTOURING FOR WELLS NOT SAMPLED.
JOB NO. DSO-67
ATTACHMENT NO. 5A

TABLE 1. CONTAMINATED MEDIA
The most recent environmental sampling at the Brownfields Property reported in the Environmental Reports occurred on February 5, 2020. The
following tables set forth, for contaminants present at the Brownfields Property above unrestricted use standards or screening levels, the maximum or
most recent concentration found at each sample location, and the applicable standard or screening level. Screening levels and groundwater standards
are shown for reference only and are not set forth as cleanup levels.
SOIL
Soil contaminants are in milligrams per kilogram (the equivalent to parts per million), the screening levels for which are derived from the Preliminary
Residential and Industrial/Commercial Health -Based Soil Remediation Goals of the Department of Environmental Quality (February 2018 version):
Contaminant
Sample Location
Date of Sampling
Concentration Exceeding
Screening Level (mg/Kg)
Residential Screening
Leveli (mg/Kg)
Non -Residential' Level
lSoil
(mg/Kg)
Arsenic
SB-5-1
February 4, 2020
5.2
0.68
3.0
SB-5-2
February 4, 2020
1.8
0.68
3.0
SB-6-1
February 4, 2020
3.9
0.68
3.0
SB-6-2
February 4, 2020
1.7
0.68
3.0
SB-DUP (SB-6-2)
February 4, 2020
1.7
0.68
3.0
Hexavalent Chromium
(Cr VI)
SB-5-1
February 4, 2020
<0.326'
0.31
6.5
SB-6-1
February 4, 2020
<0.333
0.31
6.5
'Screening levels displayed for non -carcinogens are for a hazard quotient equal to 0.2. Screening levels displayed for carcinogens are for a 1.0E-5
lifetime incremental cancer risk.
Laboratory Results for soil samples SB-5-1 and SB-6-1 had a detection limit for Hexavalent Chromium that was at a higher concentration than the
Residential Screening Limit. Hexavalent Chromium was reported below these detection limits.
Bold - Reported concentration in exceedance of Non -Residential Screening Level.
GROUNDWATER
Groundwater contaminants are in micrograms per liter (the equivalent of parts per billion), the standards for which are
contained in Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2L (21L), Rule .0202, (April 1, 2013 Version):
Groundwater Contaminant
Sample Location
Date of Sampling
Concentration Exceeding
Sc In Level /L
NC2LGWQS (µg/L)
Tetrachloroethene(PCE)
M W-7
September 6, 2016
60.6
0.7
GW-1
February 5, 2020
72.1
0.7
GW-2
February 5, 2020
9.7
0.7
GW-4
February 5, 2020
3.5
0.7
GW-DUP (GW-4)
February 5, 2020
3.4
0.7
Trichloroethene (TCE)
MW-7
September 6, 2016
9.95
3.0
GW-1
February 5, 2020
8.3
3.0
Groundwater contaminants with potential for vapor intrusion (VI) are in micrograms per liter (the equivalent of parts per billion), the vapor intrusion
screening levels for which are derived from the Residential and Non -Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels of the Division of Waste
Management (February 2018 version):
Groundwater Contaminant
Sample Location
Date of Sampling
Concentration Exceeding
Screening Level(µg/L)
Residential Screening
Level (µg/L)
Non -Residential
li Screening Level
(pg/L)
Tetrachloroethene(PCE)
MW-7
September 6, 2016
60.6
12
48
GW-1
February 5, 2020
72.1
12
48
GW-2
February 5, 2020
9.7
12
48
GW-4
February 5, 2020
3.5
12
48
GW-DUP (GW-4)
February 5, 2020
3.4
12
48
Trichloroethene (TCE)
MW-7
September 6, 20Ti
9.95
1.0
4.4
GW-1
February 5, 2020
8.3
1.0
14.4
'Screening levels displayed for non -carcinogens are for a hazard quotient equal to 0.2. Screening levels displayed for carcinogens are for a 1.0E-5
lifetime incremental cancer risk.
Bold - Reported concentration in exceedance of Non -Residential Screening Level.
SOIL GAS
Soil gas contaminants are in micrograms per cubic meter, the screening levels for which are derived from Residential and Non -Residential Vapor
Intrusion Screening Levels of the Division of Waste Management (February 2018 Version):
Non -Residential
Concentration Exceeding
Residential Screening
Sub -Slab Vapor Contaminant
Sample Location
Date of Sampling
3
Screening Level (µg/m)
Level'(µg/m3)
Screening Level'
(pg/m)
SG-9
February 4, 2020
3,640
280
3,500
SG-10
February 4, 2020
7,770
280
3,500
Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
SG-11'
February 3, 2020
625
280
3,500
SG-DUP' (SG-11)
February 3, 2020
518
280
3,500
Trichloroethene (TCE)
SG-9
February 4, 2020
<14.73
14
180
SG-30
February 4, 2020
85.6
14
180
Total Xylenes
SG-9
February 4, 2020
2,065
700
8,800
'Screening levels displayed for non -carcinogens are for a hazard quotient equal to 0.2. Screening levels displayed for carcinogens are for a 1.0E-5
lifetime incremental cancer risk.
'Samples SG-11 and SG-DUP were collected as sub -slab soil gas samples.
3Laboratory Results for soil gas sample SG-9 had a detection limit for Trichloroethene that was at a higher concentration than the Residential Screening
Limit. Trichloroethene was reported below these detection limits.
Bold - Reported concentration in exceedance of Non -Residential Screening Level.

_
5 £
0
u
�§\\
rm ®
« cn $
g % G /
. o u E
J % 2 a
0®J§
¢ �
E
k
m
4)°
\/\�\k@&/E
°
n
o
0
¥\
m
£
)
j
$
m
y
w't/
=mr-
r
\
\j\27z\/\@
)
�
\ OP
maim
n��������
-
iiiii
w
\
j/06m
I-�
MN
0=-1-1
mm
\
�ontNco
CO
r=
_
CO
j
04
§d�iii7\
_
-j
-j�
r
CO
w
�
§
k
co
a
�
Lu
7
m
mmmm®awmmm
/
))))a)))sf
mmmm
mmmw�
C�
\
))§§®iiiii
n�����
°g)))e\
/
m
y
k
{
e
e
m
A
G
w
_
/(ok
0
c
]
)
c
ems§/m
§2
@
e
$
ec[2
§
(OD
fg
?2
&
0
/
/
j�)�(
w2-
fe
m
%§==f-««04s
7
m
ecoC)w
ewe
m
\
\
/
2
\
\
)
/
cm
/
/
\
>
»
\
}
}
2
2
\ u
} ?
\ °
/> _0
E)m E
:
/k\) .>m)C<
/%g-ƒ/
)/\\//
bnn0
U) z „
§J§/�\=
5% e (D u X o
zf)fzwzmm

\ 0
J � «
§ "0 �
q z q
04 rco
k« 2 �
- m o
e J 2 O .
■ 2 a
/ w
E _
Etm
I 2
k
2�
o
S§
�/
z u
«
/
co
In
2
<
/j
co
m
\
/j
m
\
q
/%
\
7
\_
2
\
«
//
w
m
<
00
/j
m
f
/j
\
«
__
\
ii
\
E
\
�
0
o
g
/
/
EE
7
7
/
ƒ
m
m
ee
e
\
k
�
_
/
/
@
f
§
�
E
2
\
I
/
/
E
/
2
/
_
_
\
O
\
z
/
}
%
\
k
2 §
=zm
( 0 m L)
k�@esE
�3zJ}S
@E\o0)
g 2 % & e
g o E: 0
f CD-
/ 0 / ƒ
S3 5)$
=2=q/2
\C) o--
11
§�§r00
egOƒIIe
zwzeocl

Table 3: Summary of Soil Laboratory Analytical Results
EPA Method 8260, EPA Method 8270, & EPA Method 6010D/7471 B (RCRA 8-Metals)
Seaboard Station & Vicinity Parcels
- - Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina 27604
ECS Project 49:4841-D
Table Date: 10/25/2018
EPA Method 8260
Sample ID
B-21 1.0 - 5.0'
B-21 18.5 - 20.0'
B-22 3.5 - 5.0'
B-22 13.5 - 15.0'
Comparison
Criteria
Sample Depth (Feet)
1.0 to 5.0
18.5 to 20.0
3.5 to 5.0
1
13.5 to 15.0
Protection of
Groundwater
PSRG
Residential
PSRG
Non -
Residential
PSRG
Percent Moisture (%)
9.4
13.5
11.0
11.6
Sample Date
10/8/2018
Method (Parameter)
EPA Method 8260
Detected Compounds
All Results in m /K
1
Acetone
0.176 BRL 11 0.150
25
1 12,000
1140,000
EPA Method 8270
Sample ID
B-21 1.0 - 5.0'
B-21 18.5 - 20.0'
B-22 3.5 - 5.0' 1
B-22 13.5 - 15.0,
Comparison
Criteria
Sample Depth (Feet)
1.0 to 5.0
18.5 to 20.0
3.5 to 5.0
13.5 to 15.0
Protection of
Groundwater
PSRG
Residential
PSRG
Non -
Residential
PSRG
Percent Moisture (%)
9.4
13.5
11.0
11.6
Sam le Date
10/8/2018
Method (Parameter)
EPA Method 8270
Detected Compounds
All Results in m /K
No EPA Method 8270 Analytes Reported Above Laboratory Method Detection
Limits.
EPA Method 601 OD and 7471 B (Total RCRA 8-Metals)
Sample ID
B-21 1.0 - 5.0'
B-21 18.5 - 20.0'
B-22 3.5 - 5.0'
B-22 13.5 - 15.0,
Comparison
Criteria
Sample Depth (Feet)
1.0 to 5.0
18.5 to 20.0
3.5 to 5.0
13.5 to 15.0
Protection of
Groundwater
PSRG
Residential
PSRG
Non -
Residential
PSRG
Percent Moisture (%)
9.4
13.5
11.0
11.6
Sample Date
10/8/2018
Method (Parameter)
EPA Method 601OD & 7471B
Selected Compounds
All Results
in mg/Kg
Arsenic
BRI
RL
BRL
BRL
5.8
0.68
3.0
Barium
92.1
116
121
52.8
580
3,100
47,000
Cadmium Diet
BRI
t3RL
BRL
BRL
3.0
14
200
Chromium (Total)
5.3
14.5
5.2
3.6
3.8
0.31
6.5
Lead
4.4
3.3
4.5
4.5
270
400
800
Selenium
BRL
BRL
BRL
2.1
78
1,200
Silver
BRL
BRL
BRL
3.4
78
1,200
Mercury (Elemental)
0.0067
BRL
0.017
1.0
2.3
9.7
Notes:
Results presented in (mg/kg)
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Practical Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs), February 2018.
BRL = Below Reporting Limit, Refer to analytical laboratory report for individual analyte reporting limits.
Embolded data indicates an exceedance of the Residential PSRGs.
Embolded data in shaded cells indicates an exceedance of the Residential and Protection of Groundwater PSRGs.
Non -Residential PSRGs were not exceeded in any sample.
Page 5 of 5

0 2
M C.4 # C,4
k00
2
© %
0 2 w
0���
.0 Go
■v
�LU >2$
ad
k § a 4)
■o0
kco���
Cl)
0-0
2 % % LU
0 4)
§Im
s
k� ��
w
§ �
m
We -
o }
� 7 $
_ >
2 \ \
o
o
m
o
®
k c
o •-
a
9
o
'
CO®
\
0
2 §
>
o
>
/
Q
2CO
�02
w
Z-
L
0
U
kE§
?
o
//±
/
Ea/
m¢
c
C)o
o
/
04
r>
�
>
a-
o
2
o
0
o
�
a $
m
$
2 -
\
/
/
\
r
±
/
/
L
>
>
0 2
cn
0
<
N
2@mI-ItE
22
2
w
2
Z
2
//
k,:
Z
k
//
cn
6
-i
Im
Wq
m
nrl-
"
R
2
0
00
6\
&&
L
Z
>
Z
Z
00
/C
�
2
2
2
n
a
2
2
\
2m
zz
>-
co
>224_
r
2
J
Z
2
2
2
2
E
2
2
0
Z
N
Z
Z
Z
Z
U
z
z
a
g
/
k
/
Ci
2
/
k
/
/
\
U
�
w
z
�
o
=
_
m
0
��
2
Fu
0
/
<
k
w
/
m
m
U
_
CO)
\
>
t
E
>
2
2
-:sC:
2
f
2
\
\
/
$
co
I
/CD�
�
C
04
0
\
E
2
R
E
co/
\ƒ
5
§
f
Lu
IL
2
0
212
/
3
2
13
/ /
e
/ /
co
/
= 2 d
LO m < %
/ k
o / /
/ \ b
k04/ /
0
U co §
/�f D
ƒ a)\
ƒ d 0 /
L£7Z
< Z k \ /
$�v//
\ 75 < E $
/ (
= c 2 e "
t� 020
k § \ f
/
f®� ? (D
§ 0 = f
72Uy�
2 » 0
U) kkƒ
o o m
\g\%S
2 \ E c 0
g = 0 0
Co 2 t U n
�-0M 0
% ) S a)o ± / § -0
< IL- o -0
U o � - o
ZZ£km
k
k
f
L
k
11
Z
0
f
2
/
2
Z
0
_
2
1

E
O
s
U
x
2
rn
rn
ti
O
s
d
Q
V)a
W
U) od
d
� y O
y N
'5'22 V fC
L
f6co
—
W
Y
O d' s 0
m " 2 t T
Lm OCrn
f� 06
J ti C r U
O C
ink ° °a
Co
U
0 to � � m U
0 R W
m s O
E
7 c
cn a
M W
m ti
00
O
s
N
Q
a
W
O
O
N
00
O
s
Y
d
a
a
W
W
OR
@
c C�
O
O
C N
O
Z a (n
O
R
�
m
U
c f7
O
m
o
N
L(
N d
m
�
Q
O
O N
U
0 3 c7
LO
f�
N
0 o
a c7
0
C6
o
C6
0
o
r
Y
O
�
O
04
b
Lo
M
m
O
N
W
O
CO
O
�
M
p
O
C
r
Lo
O
O
m
0
L6
O
�
o
�
CO
to
Y
M
N
00
CM
E
N
M
O
N
s
N
m
0
a
°
o
o
w
Q
O
CD
Ln
o
Lo
ri
N
Lq
O
N
M
m
�
0
0
0
0
N
�
00
o
M
Y
Ln
b
N
m
O
Ln
O
Ln
CO
_
O
O
N
m
a
c
N
O
O
CL
a
U
LL
L
O
7,
O
O
Q
O
Q)
a
c
Q
O_
O_
U
O_
p
M
M
N
M
U
cn
cn
a
cn
Q
3
c
O
U
O
to
N
co
O
s
a�
Q
a
w
L=
(�
O
O
0 co
O
�a
m
R
U
c t9
O
m
=cn
o
N
N d
N
L
d
Q
O
O d
U
3 c9
0LO
U r- cn
N
2 = a
0 0
a
0
0
0
N
6
O
N
J
m
O
m
O
06
m
O
W
O
co
O
co
LO
O
O
co
Co.
O
O
O
Lfi
m
0
O
�
N
oN
r
�
Y
fl
O
to
N
O
co
0
O
C.0
O
O
s
d
o
p
W
—
Q
o
M
O
�
v
�
N
O
o
O
N
�
C6
0
O
p
C
O
N
O
V
M
J
06
00
0
-1-
06
m
0
co
0
p
co
O
J
m
O
m
a
c
N
E
O
°
2
E
o
a
U
L
O
O
O
O
O_
O_
U
O_
O
M
cn
M
co
N
a
M
co
U
Q
C C�
O
z U, a
°
m
U
c f7
m �
o
a U
U)
7A d
d
Q
O
O N
U
0 3 c7
u C U
�' = a
0 0
a c7
0
06
0
06
O
O
�
O
Lo
LO
O
J
°
N
U
N
O
N
LO
O
�
�
L
�
O
O
�
�
m
O
m
�
o
O
ol
J
O
N
Y
M
00
E
-0
N
a
O
Q
o
m
y
o
d
LO
O
W
Q
Ln
O
Lo
Co
Q
N
M
O
O
N
co
O
O
O
N
O
�
LO
O
06
Q
Ln
d
—w
w
N
O
m
z
O
L
O
O
O
O
N
m
z
E
D
00-
2
E
a°i
a
U
L
O
O
O
Q
N
0-0-
U
m
m
N
m
co0
U)
C C�
O
z�a
°
�L
m
U
c f7
�
m �
(n
cn d
.r
m
N4)
LL
O
O N
U
o 3 0
a
0 0
a C7
0
00
N
6
N
O
O
M
N
�
O
O
C6
�
J
m
O
O
O
�
06
O
0
Co
O
O
0
C,
O
47
Lri
�
m
O
m
�
o
p
O
m
N
p
N
O
Y
J
00
o
o
co
00�
CD
O
(p
O
O
Q
O
s
00
�0-
d
cn
a
o
a
I'-
o
w
Q
cn
r0
an
O
>
O
C
Q
N
m
O
N
co
o
-6
0
0
°
O
L
O
NO
CO
�o
d
,;t
06
w
m
Z
0
C6O
O
O
O
'
O
m
N
C
N
E
O
°
CL
a°i
a
U
L
O
O
O
Q
N
°
o
O
a
°
�
a
° -
U
M
a
M
UM:),
N
O
°
M
a

7
E
O
s
U
x
2
rn
rn
T
ti
O
C�
L
a
_Ya
3 w
v! ca
(D
� y O
�O
y+ r
V N y N
M 00 i
r !6 —
Q a °w
� M
Oa' Go
L m O O)
Zv
J ti C r V
on O C
O p V 3 0
w O N a
O`O� °'co
L)
0 O R W
E O N
cna�''�
a
M w
_N
00
O
L
N
a
w
O
�O
N
00
L
G1
a
w
E
2
E
m
C�
O
O
�
O
Lf)
O
O
Lf)
O
O
O
f�
Z 'O U)
('7
"
N
(
`O
f0
N
N
6j
N a
M
O
lC
d
CD,
q
O
GOOM
C
(0
OMT
MOM
GNG
1-
nN
to
Vl a
l6
�
O
O G)
3�
V
a000aooaooTv,0
N
N
d a (n
=a
N
M
M
O
M
M
N
M
T
0 0
a C9
0
co
C)
06
J
J
J
J
O
Z
Z
V
o
LO
Ln
CO
m
O
N
O
(o
C)
CD
M
p
J
J
N
Q
Q
commo
J
J
O
�o
mLnm
TZZ
0]
m
o
��
r
❑
EmLOm
(>Zm
ammo
O
C
N
r
C
"
m
75
O
O
N
LO
C)
Q
l0
O
CL
2'
N
`
N
7
Q.
Ln
M
LO
co
w
m
r
O
-
m
m
m
m
N
M
m
N
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
W-�
4
Q
w
M
x
w
w
W
L
m
r
m
T
Z
M
M
m
m
in
N
r
m
0
L6
o
O
Q
Q'
r
0'
M
O
Q
Z
r
0
m
m
m
m
m
0
CDN
m
o�
�
c
d
N
00
w
c
T
E
N
cu
U
7
7
-p
�0
E
2N
Q
L
CD
U
❑~
L
-
U
E
N
�❑
a)
o
r)
m
❑
a)
a,
E
U
c
W
E
CD
E
E
N
O
C
_N
°�
Eo
x
E
E
2
E
>
I),
ID
in
in°-U)
¢`m(iv�=�in�
Ca)
O
O
H
C)
LO
O
CD
O
LO
O
O
O
I--
Z a fn
co
,-
N
(O
C)(OLO
N
N
Oj
N a
co
c
{6
U
C
N JX
o
co
o
M
c
O
M
OO
coOo
coOo
0
O
M
r
O
C,V
N
VJ a
N
Q
O
O N
Ucu
3U
o000000000rvo
N
O C (nL
0
yOj
M
M
O
M
N
M
r
0a 0
0
Cl)
a c7
0
00
N
O
N
00
�
J
T
Q
Q
J
J
N
0)N
aoo
i.°rm
Ldzz
aimmo
r
C)
m
O
w
O
O
M
O
J
O
J
N
Q
Q
J
J
co
LO
�O
O
Oj
r
m
m
T
Z
ZCD
M
m
m
r
�
00
m
o
CD
No
o
N
n
v
n
cm
Y
J
J
J
J
J
(Oo
MZZ
LOmmm
O
G
E
mrm
(p
N
C
NN
r
Q
O
pp
ao
to
O
O
O
O
Q
O
M
Q
J
O
I
N
Q
r
J
J
Of
N
OR
N
W
m
M
0
0
Z
O
m
m
p
C)
�
m
O
O
O
O
�
O
C'j
Of
O
of
00Q
ZZ
Q
O
vmmm
w
w
w
_oo
mrm
r
m
0
0
0
O
O
CO
J
I--
V
I
Q
Q
00
O
J
J
N
C
m
(O
CD
N
Z.
Z
m
m
m
O
d
a�
c
E
O
w
^
EO
E
ocu
0
EC
ii
o
-
aci
Q
w
2
t
a?
U
H
L
U
E
o
O
o
g�
U
o
w
E
E
U
N
C
O
U
ID-0
E
,7
c6
N
m
-a
7
c
U
E
E
2
E
2
>
x
co
a
cncnain
QmUU�2-iinin�
vi
� cu
U) E
�
a
a)
m
00�
U
N
7
OL 7
t6 O
a
p 0
c
O O
O O
LL -
N 'ffiO2
O
N
O
C N
d
N
a
m a
0.9
a) U
(9
O
O U
N
U
C
U An
f6 O
OfOf 0)
a
N
U) N T
d :5 N
E �
m o m
OOf
@
a
O U E
O O
cn
C N
a `� O
m
U ::
w U N .0
U
N C U
a O
O m O C
C
N (n O
N O
O O
C +O+
a)
N
U O
N O
N C p
C
fn
x C O
cm
O
N - N M
a)
U
m 3
J
E m O)
N '-
O O <nca
C
U L
Ca
C N N
C C a
C O S T
m m N 'O
fl❑
0
0 0
m o
0 Z
0 o
'O 'O a)
O❑
7
N J 11
o m U W Q
M M r
E E m
Z ofZ m Z
w w Z w
7%
5

2\2\2\2\
$G/G$G/G
a
=
J
a
J
0
.Fe3a3e32
\C
aC
aC
a
7
@
===B===e
0
/
^m^I^I�
z\
=e=e=e=a
7777777g
7
J
oLo
CD
Lo
E
mCNmnmCNm-
\
k
Cie
�
§
\C
dC?
d\
C
m
§co
w .
\ \
°
LU E
M
k
5
y
w: a)
Lu g CO'D
<
■
o
c
w
r
a
w
R
R
w
\
CMD
) \
%
\
\
z m
� I
§§§}7
g)Nx00
�U)C;
23{\&�mE
$
§
\
z E 3 g z
°
R
a
6
w
a
\
o m E w-
e
§ k � 2 \
E
,
2/ig0-
�C co
t )
z§ s a u
o
o E _ >
/ \ \
2
�
§
\
\
o
e
�
/
\
\
§ LU
�
\
0 $
o
E 2
2
k
/
2
2
Cl
§
_
\
2 '
E
/
\
Cl)/
0
�CD
CD
I-
\
w
d }
&
\
&
\
P /
_
2
J
=
\
2
\
j
CN
m
CD
\
\
/
z
/
4
/
/
4
0
\
/
\
9
r
\
f
0
\
/
\
�
\�
t
\\

TABLE 2: SUMMARY OF SOIL GAS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Seaboard Station
Seaboard Ave., Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina
North Carolina Brownfields Project No. 22075-18-092
ECS Project No. 49-4841-H
Parameter
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Acceptable
Residential Vapor
Intrusion
Screening Levels
(May 2019)
Acceptable Non -
Residential Vapor
Intrusion
Screening Levels
(May 2019)
Location
Exterior
Sub -Slab
Sample ID
SG-9
I SG-10
SG-11
SG-DUP
Date Sampled
2/4/2020
2/3/2020
Acetone
U.1t
24.8
73.6
116
220,000
2,700,000
Benzene
77.7
28
<0.30
<0.3(
120
1,600
2-Butanone (MEK)
<21.5
6.9
<0.72
9
35,000
440,000
Carbon Disulfide
<12.7
9.4
<0.42
<0.4,
4,900
61,000
Chloroform
<11.4
4.2
<0.38
<0.3f
41
530
Chloromethane
<9.1
<0.29
<0.30
4.6
630
7,900
Cyclohexane
<20.5
26.3
<0.68
<0.0�
42,000
530,000
Dichlorodifluoromethane
<41.8
15.4
52.1
51.9
700
8,800
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
-497
4.6
<0.42
<0.42
NS
NS
Ethylbenzene
297
86.4
<0.59
<0.59
370
4,900
4-Ethyltoluene
<33.2
7.9
1.1
<1.1
NS
NS
n-Heptane
250
56.4
<0.7,
<0.74
2,800
35,000
n-Hexane
375
50.6
3.4
3.8
4,900
61,000
Napthalene
<76.2
<z..
5.8
<2.5
21
260
Propylene
4,900
378
1.2
2.1
21,000
260,000
Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
3,640
7,770
625
518
280
3,500
Tetrahydrofuran
-�15.2
2.7
85.7
88.2
NS
NS
Toluene
2,220
1,060
<0.68
<0.6E
35,000
44,000
Trichloroethene (TCE)
<14.7
85.6
<0.49
<0.49
14
180
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
8.5
24.8
28.6
NS
NS
1,2,4-Trimethyl benzene
195
12.3
<0.88
2.6
420
5,300
1,3,5-Trimethyl benzene
78.6
8.4
<0.77
<0.77
420
5,300
m&p-Xylene
1,640
370
-.1.4
<1.4
700
8,800
o-Xylene
425
90.9
3.67
<0.67
700
8,800
Notes:
Concentrations are presented in micrograms per cubic meter (pg/m3)
Bold conentration on sample result indicates and exceedance of the Residential Vapor Intrustion Screening Levels (VISLs), May 2019.
Bold Red conentration on sample result indicates and exceedance of the Non -Residential VISLs, May 2019.
Red Shaded Cells indicate Maximum Laboratory Reported Detection for the Compound.
Italicized MDLs in sample SG-9 are higher than maximum laboratory reported detection for the respective compounds.
NS = No Standard
SG-Dup = Duplicate of Sample SG-11

u_
2222
R
\/
x
\
r
\LO
_
\
\
\
\
) \
\
\
2
(D
-0mo
o
=
R
=
/
®
CD®
®
^
) 7 )
CD -
-
w
a
&
®
2
r
m
�D
0
a$
oo-
2 $
_
"I:o
77
a\
a)
Cl)
}p
j
LO
�
°CD
\
j
\
J
/
%
/
}
a
A
G
\
R
Cj
§
_%
CD\
)
/
2
/
/
/CD
k
§
/
/
\
v
/
ci
cu
�
J
3
(.0-
%
w
Cl)
2
G
4
a
v°?
7
a
S
_
2®
m
CN
1
a
Cl)
o
§
-
G
{
©
\
\
\
%
°
`
a
i
\
2
0
\
§
/
£
0
3
_
ƒ
k
L
E
ƒ
/
w
\
M
a
�
a
>,
#
o
o
>,
0-0
o
EEE
E
c
z
U)
z
_
»
,
k}\\
0
3
E
E
E
3)
0
2\§
)/
k
2
2
2
2#
2
2
3
6
6«
17

0 2
M C.4 # C,4
k00
2
© %
© M EL 2M co
2
qI�2 It
L. z V
�
k § a
■ooc
kco��
Cl)
0k�kw
MIm
s
k� ��
Ew M
m
Lol
. I
o }
° \ \
■ § �
1.0
k o 3
mf
t
#
\ §
f� o
§ m
z 3
o M u)
mod\
» § )
o
\
§
/
CD w
/cn
�
� \ 2
« k \
o
~
»
0
r
k § 2
®
o
E
cn
a
E
R
C)
C
e
=
c
k
AAA\
/
ƒ
q
�����/
c
L�/0///)Z
o
&
>
n
n
n
-
:
00
m
/
2
ƒ
k
®
\
/
O
>
0
7
2
a.
U
m
\
C.,i
z
k
o
0
o
A
1-
f
)
®
o
a)
Lu
2
�
\
/
$
o
co
Co
7±
«
_
(�
/
0
L
§
/
®\
»
m
0
m
a2E//$r->
>
\
0
�00/)(»g\
2
0
\
§-
vI�og==m
o\
0
a)
k
a
§
m
\
U
L
2
\
'B
a)
R@
\
\
z
�
2
\
z
\
�
2
�
k
/
/
k
\ %
§ \
\ k2
k £U)
g ®2$
OD t % \ 2 7
/CN
\ q / $ _0
±
a) 0 2 ?
\/z
c L o
0 @±£
\ z \/0
.> - ^ ® E
0
\ /\/
E� \ w 2
§ 2 S /
J a")2 \ / k X 2
\/2" M
/ O 0 --0
e E�
o t ® \ e
z-
11 0--
/ / B
\ cu = §
co/ c § a)ƒ
-0a- _
2 @ $
U) -0/ \ 2 §
% G
M ± e o o /
» § Co 0
7 0 C m / £
�zo2co @o
@®\%£§
0 5 _ o
? CDm � _
~ a)0 3 S J
§ / 7 S $
0
zk </2I

O N
Z N
2 0
c Z
0 y
x 'o
a`
o m
O <
p � m O
a m Z
a '2 .a
o o U a
at0i a`0i o U
fn f) Z W
`m
a
E v
E m (�
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
m O m d.
O
C)
N
O
O
W
O
N
2 V r
a
Z
N
m
0
M
ri
N
0
O
W
N
N
O)
N 2
-Jo
c
U
c a
N N
O
W
O
0
O
7
O
O
O
O
O
M
N
Z
N
d' m
N
m L
m=
= N
x
V
O
N
r
M
O
h
O_
O
O
O
O
O
N
L
N
Q
Lo
p
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
V
n
Z
M
O
Ov
O
G
O
v
0
V
v
V
O
V
O
p
v
V
V
M
m
7
O
m
V
N
N
M
r
N
N
O
O
m
O
V
Q
7
O
0
0
0
0
0
r
z
cc
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
v
v
o
o
V
v
v
v
Q
n
a
o
rn
v3
o
p
p
o
0
0
0
0
0
Lo
�+
p
z
of
o
0
a
o
o
vv
0
v
O
o
o
v
v
v
6
o
V
a
o
O
v
N
M
7
O
N
M
O
M
N
MO
m
O
O
O
O
O
00
0
O
O
O
aN0
O
M
^
N
Q
Z
V
7
O
O
O
Ov
OV
0
p
O
v
O
v
O
V
O
V
17
W
04
7
M
CA
co
h
p
O
q O
O
Op
cq
O)
N
O
O
N
O
O
Q
O
O
6
o
O
O
O
p
O)
v
O
O)
V
V
O
O
N
0
N
V
O
O
c0
t0
0
LO
O
Q
O
M
O
M
O
Q
in
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
z
O
O
O
O
Ov
Ov
OV
v
V
O
O
V
V
O
O
a0
O
N
M
N
'
m
0)o
v
0
0
0
o
v
m
o
Q
0
0
Q
o
0
0
o
0
V
0
0
0
0
0
V
p
o
o
v
v
p
O
O
O
O
O
COO
V
Oi
Q
Z
M
l0
O
N
Q
O
p
p
O
v
O
v
v
V
O
O
O
OV
p
O
O
V
V
V
V
O
N
O
0
00
O
O
Q
M
O
a
N
N
O
Q
N
p
v
V
O
V
V
O
v
V
Ov
O
D
�O
v
v
o
v
M�
O
�
O
O
NO
N
N
00
LO
�
O
M
10
0
"T
O)
Q
o
o
p
o
0
0
0
o
n
Z
rn
o
0
0
0
0
o
v
c
V
v
v
o
v
v
o
v
v
v
O)
N
7
r
O
O
W
OD
MN
0
00
0
N
0
N
o
LO
CO
n
Q
Z
Cl!
O')
o
O
O
Q
o0
00
00
0
00
O
p
of
0
0
v
v
v
o
v
O
v
v
N
o
0
o
n
oo
�
�
v
v
Q
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
n
M
p
O
Z
O
p
Q
O
O
O
v
C
V
V
O
v
V
O
N
O
M
N
7
0
0
p
p
0
W
Q
CO
M
0
OD
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
p
O
Z
6
QN
O
O
O
V
V
O
O
V
O
O
O
N
O
�2
�2
Q
N
O
o
O
0
O
0
O
Cl
O
CV
N
O
z
O
O
O
o
v
O
ci
v
`n
vv
O
W
n
M
o
o
N'
1
M
0)00
M
O
O
N
�
OD
O
M
M
Q
7
M
M
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
OO
O
O
O
O
6
Z
m
O
OV
O
o
O
0
O
p
d
v
V
OJ
O)
V
p
o
w
L
N
O
Q
7
O
O
O
O
0
•M-
Lp[1
W
N
n
7
O
N
Q
O
O
O
UO
V
O
V
p
W
T
O
0
O
Ov
O
U
O
O
N
h
O
O
N
O
N
'
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
a
.�-
OO
n
(O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
Q
OO
O
O
00
v
v
O
O
O
O
O
O
a
E
m
O
N
ci
O
O
a
U
Q
j
°
E
-'
a
E
4
o
d
m
o
W
o
J
ns
w
U
Y
rn
c
a
y
E
{F
v
U
C
C
m
p
O
L
N
CS
E
U
0
0Uco0n
0
gf�
Uo
UE
J`d
p
p
xo
Lm
>
.y
7
2oNai
Ld
C1
xmai
ay
>mmm
O)
m
N
i
Q
1-
N
aEi
y
N
Z
w
Q
m
0
U
J
fn
fn
O

U
da
E 0.
O
O
N O mcc
O
pp
(n
N
O
O
O
N
p0
O
O
r
P776
N
m
W
N
N
O
7
M
N 2
a
C
L_
A
S �
m N
o0
o
O
O
c a
p
o
w
tq
m
N
O
m
o
a
o
n>
O
V
pp
r
m
n
M
N N
N
N
Z
�
N
o
(V
N l0
S m
N
2
d
m
"'
m
o
0
0
0
�°
r
o
00
Q
m
N
O
O
O
LL7
o
m
Z
m
p
O
O
O
O
O
o
V
V
o
tp
o
n
n
o
m
o
M
m
M
O
O
00
O
O
N
O
Q
Z
V
m
p
O
00
m
N
0
O
O
O
O
Ih
O
o
V
r
W
N
N
O
o
O
O
N
M
O
N
Z
O
O
M
m
N
O
O
O
OV
O
O
O
o
o
V
m
N
O
O
O
O
v
o
O
O
V
Ov
O
V
v
O
O
V
O
V
N
N
M
MO
t0o
o
O
O
.-
V
o
a
Q
h
M
3
m
O
O
O
O
o
O
V
O
V
O
M
o
V
m
Z
M
O
O
V
O
V
7
p
O
00
M
m
N
Q
7
p
N
0
O
O
O
o
m
O
Z
m
'O
o
O
V
O
p
V
O
M
m
o
O
O
O
O
V
V
p
O
O
O
O
N
m
N
O
p
O
O
O
V
O
Z
.6MO
O
V
o
O
�2
voV
V
V
O
V7
a
V
O
O
Ov
OV
M
N
OV
O
G
O
O
O
p
V
O
V
OV
V
N^
00
O
00
O
O
Q
N
O
p
O
O
O
eq
N
N
Z
V
O
O
O
m
O
O
V
p
v
O
V
o
v
v
V
O
O
D)
M
M
p
Z
pV
a0
m
LL7
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
V
Ov
V
V
N
v
o
O
O
00
O
N
l0
00
00
N
00
R
a
Q
I�
(h
N
00
m
O
a
O
O
fN
Z
N
O
p
N
p
O
v
O
V
v
O
V
o
a
m
O
NO
O
t
O
O
O
V
V
o
V
vOv
oO
V
VVv
v
v
0
v
d
o
N
O
O
Q
p
N
m
ui
N
O
6
p
0
O
0
O
6
uu"
o
m
m
o
�O
Z
O
o
0
o
ov
v
v
m
N
N
00
00
00
00
T
M
Np
u)
Q
M
m
O
0
0
o
o
pv
m
Z
O
o
o
o
v
v
v
n
v
O
v
a
A
O
O
m
O
o
o
s
d
w
Q
r
¢
a
¢
a
W
¢
a
m
O
W
(1
T
W
16
d
d
Lu
F
d
N
T
L
H
L
V
W
L
0
U
N
N
N
O
L
>
«
9
v>
a
d
N
m
a�i
m
aai
d
c
m
>.
y
ao
E
E
d
°�
t
o¢
2
E
o
o
d
E
E
E
a
ai
ai
a
y
N
fq
C
Q
m
Z
d
0
LL
OUC
Q
m
U
U
U
(A
(n
w

`m
a
N
y o 00 2
0
o
m
N
o
0
0
0
o
u>
o0
0
o
n
x L iA
O
Z
N
O
M
N
O
(O
W
N
N
01
M
O
r
a
M
�x
v
c
L
m
S �
mS
o
y a
o
Q
U
W
m
o
a
o
r>
o
ro
m
M
a s
o
N
N
v
z
N
o
ni
o
v
n
n
N
N N
M
N
N t0
� m
fA
M
m
O
O
O
m
m
m
M
N
Q
a
MO
7
m
00
N
Z
fp
v
p
p
N
O
VV
O
OV
V
O
O
V
V
O
V
N
N
O
00
O
O
O
I
M
O
0
N
O
N
O
M
M
O
h
m
O
N
O
O
O
O
00
O
V
6
0
Z
7
v
V
Ov
O
0
0
v
v
O
O
O
Q
MO
m
O
00
00
00
00
O
m
0
Z
W
.
O
N
O
V
v
v
V
O
O
N
N
V
O
�
m
O
O
00
O
O
00
Ol
O
Z
W
v
0
O
O
V
O
V
0
v
v
v
O
V
n
W
p
O
o
a
o
O
M
Q
O
a
p
m
In
O
O
O
O
0
m
0
00
Z
O
0
O
O
O
V
Ov
V
O
V
V
V
p
N
N
O
O
O
lN'1
10
p
Q
N
M
O
w
0
0
00
0
00
00
o
n
0
z
o
0
0
o
V
V
p
v
v
v
o
0
m
N
O
00
00
00
po
O
m
Z
fp
v
O
V
0
O
O
N
m
N
O
00
00
00
O
m
Z
1�
O
O
O
0
O
O
V
m
o
ui
o
0
0
0
0
ov
0
tO
o
M
z
n
o
0
0
No
N
0
0
v
v
v
o
v
v
O
O
N
I[1
m
O'
NO
O
O
0
O
W
0
N
Z
V
p
O
0
0
0
0
v
V
0
0
v
o
V
NN
O
NO
Q
In
p
M
O
00l
m
C2
Z
N
N
O
m
O
0
OV
O
p
O
O
v
V
G
0
V
0
V V
O
D7
Q
N
O
O
M
m
o
0
po
ov
N
o
z
m
0
O
000
v
T
0
v
v
0
0
v
0
N
O
MO
Q
m
0
n0
O
00
O
O
0
Ov
M
Z
cM0
0
O
0
N
0
O
O
O
V
V
O
V
0
N
O
6
^
O
N
0
Q
N
0
M
0
0
O
0
O
o
N
O
n
Z
O
m
p
0
O
V
0
O
V
O
V
v
O
v
v
O
O
N
m
V
M
^
m
d
m
m
o
o
o
m^
o
a
Q
o
o
m
d
p
0
0
0
0
0
o
M
0
0
z
N
ov
o0
0
0
N
m
in
N
m
m
Ln
O
0
O
0
O
A
0
v
O
v
V
V
V
O
v
a
n
O
O
b
O
O
O
r
L
N
N
a
0
a
a
¢
a
w
a
a
m
O
W
�
W
F
t
V
w
o
p
U
a
m
m
m
m
m
d
da�
o
o£
£
E
m
a
N)
U
Qz
ma
a
w
am
U
U
(d
(nW

a
s$
o
p
O
0
o
y G m
o
o
M
N
N
o
o
0
0
0
o
u>
o
O
0
o
0
x V L N
O
O
Z
N
O
M
r
N
O
(O
M
N
N
a7
m
a
M
mx
v
c
L
m
x�
C 1
a s
o
�
v
z
a
o
M
ri
o
v
n
n
N
tll N
N
N
N l0
Q m
N
x
m
O
M
p
O
O
O
O
v
O
V
O
00
m
Z
I�
O
O
O
O
V
O
p0
O
M
O
d
Np
N
O
O
o0
O
00
O
O
N
r
N
p
Q
Z
OD
V
O
p
O
V
v
V
V
O
O
V
O
V
O
O
O
O
O
o0
W
m
p
O
O
O
O
O
O
n
n0
r
Z
it1
O
OV
N
Ln
N
V
V
V
O
O>
^
Q
O
O
O
M
M
Q
M
M
C?
M
p
m
N
o0
O
00
O
p
O
y
Z
m
O
O
O
N
V
N
O
p
N
p
V
O
O
V
O
C;
V
O
a
^O
O
N
O
O
N
O
O
Q
O
N
O
m
O
W
O
m
o0
O
O
M
Z
m
O
O
00
O
O
V
O
V
p
V
p
V
V
O
O
m
O
O
O
V
V
a
Q
m
m
p
O
m
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Z
m
7
O
O
p
V
V
�
p
v
O
N
O
O
�
O
M
T
O
m
4n
O
p
C
0
Z
O
O
O
O
o
O
V
O
O
V
O
V
n
GO
MO
O
O
O
O
th
O
^
Z
N
N
O
O
m
O
O
O
O
V
vp
Ir
M
O
O
O
m
Q
N
M
O
O
m
M
O
00
00
00
O
O
M
Z
it1
O
O
C;V
V
V
O
V
o
V
M
N
O
m
N
O
O
p0
O
O
M
p
m
Z
V
O
O
V
V
O
V
V
C;
O
V
N
7
O
p0
O
M
O
OD
Q
I�
M
M
O�
m
N
p
o0
O
o0
O
O
O
m
Z
�D
O
O
O
O
V
V
O
V
N
V
V
V
O
O
nN
^
O
p0
O
Q
V
M
00
m
O
u�
O
p
O
p
O
O
o
M
Z
r
O
O
O
p
N
O
V
�
V
O
V
O
V
V
C;
O
a
M
O
O
N
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
V
O
v
m
Z
6
V
O
O
O
V
O
O
O
O
O
n
O
y
O
O
M
T
O
O
N
00
Q
Z
M
v:
O
N
O
N
O
G
O
V
O
V
O
V
O
O
O
V
O
a
m
n
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
M
Z
M
O
O
O
m
u')
p
V
p
V
p
V
O
V
O
oy
V
O
O
V
O
f�
O
O
O
p
OI
Z
N
MO
n
O
m
o
p
o
p
o
V
C
v
V
o
0
v
v
v
o
a
r
O
O
b
O
O
N
L
t00
N
a
0
¢
a
¢
a
w
¢
a
m
o
W
m
W
'C6
ci
w
>.
_
r
O
a
N
L
N
U
w
2
o
r
U
tl!
w
.-.
5
0
V,
a
ro
0
m
0
.0d�
c
.0
¢
d
N
N
N
W
N
�
E
E
Z`
E
E
E
U'
°
m
a
s
w
`0
¢
a�i
E
o
o
v
d
c'i
N
A
en
(N
U)
G
Q
Z
d
G
LL
R
Q
0�0
U
U
U
J
(n
N T
m m
o O
ro ro
R itl
00
C?dT ad
Z 0 O

U
N a
E y
o
E m
o
0
o
O
N O m 2
O
o
ro
N
o
o
o
u)
o
O
h
S U N
p
Z
p
M
^
N
O
(O
m
N
N
m
- m IT
N 2
C
L_
A
2 �
c a
o
o
4
N
m
o
w
o
v
po
O
pp
M
9 a
o
N
v
z�
a
o
rpi
o
v
n
n
N
w m
2 m
N
2
O
m
NO
O
O
p
v
V
Z
O
O
O
N
p
V
OV
V
V
V
O
O
00
V
MO
O
p
m
M
M
N
OO
00
O
0o
00
O
p
00
cs
O
o
7
<O
m
O
I�
¢
Z
6
m
V
v
O
O
O
V
V
6M
7
O
O
N
^
m
¢
r
M
MO
O
m
In
N
p
p
O
O
p
O
O
p
V
O
V
O
O
M
Z
6
O
V
Oy
O
O
V
O
m
N
O
C0
O
O
V
v
p
v
CS
v
y
O
v
V
O
O
n
N
N
M
¢
m
M
V
p
MO
p^j
O
LL)
O
00
00
O
O
n
O
N
Z
m
O
m
o
v
O
V
m
MO
p
m
O
O
O
O
OO
O
O
M
O
v
m
O
W
7
O
O
p
z
O
O
V
v
O
O
O
V
N
yMj
p
T
r
O
N
O
00
O
O
p
7
M
tM0
Z
O
p
p
m
N
Oy
p
Oy
O
V
O
00
N
V
v
Oy
cs
V
O
m
O
N
O
O
p
00
O
O
00
N
O
M
N
¢
M
O
m
N
00
O
v
OV
O
O
p
N
O
V
y
V
O
O
V
O
O
W
M
mO
iD
M
O
O
p0
O
O
p0
h
I�
Q
M
M
O
m
N
O
00
o
O
O
<O
O
m
Z
u')
v
O
O
N
V
M
O
p0
O
O
M
O
m
pO
CMj
O
O
O
7
h
O
00
Q
Z
C1
Lf)
O
N
O
v
O
O
0
O
v
N
V
V
n
M
N
N
M
MO
O
m
O
O
O
'
r
O
N
p
f�
O
O
O
p
O
V
O
V
O
p
V
V
V
O
V
7
y
M
N
O
p0
O
N
m
M
MO
O
O
O
00
M
r
p
D)
¢
r
O
m
O
O
Ci
W
Z
O)
O
O
O
y
OV
y
O
O
V
y
O.
N
00
O
p0
Np
y
5
m
N
N
o
p
p0
0
N
p
Oy
O
Oy
00
OV
O
O
Oy
OV
Oy
V
M
O
00
M
fD
O
M
Q
LL2
O
O
m
Lb
O
p
O
O
p
O
O
V
O
O
Z
O
V
O
O
p
V
oV
V
o
N
O
V
V
n
N
N
^
W
M
m
M
O
m
m
O
O
O
p
V
V
O
v
J
v
o
A
a
O
O
V
V
O
O
m
p
O
h
O
L
W
¢
a
¢
a
w
¢
a
m
O
W
0]
T
wo
O
Y
a
a
m
N
W
O
U
N
m
L
O
UcL
,
a
p
p
c
d
¢
N
)
V
d
m
d
v
m
O
m
>,
v
c
ao
>
>
E
Z,
d
°p
`mo
¢
E
o
d
£
£
E
a
a�i
o
v
c'i
y
w
M
G
Q
m
Z
G
cc
Q
m
U
0
0
(n
y
�a
Z 0

E
y G m
o
o
m
U
o
0
0
0
0
o
In
o
0
o
n
x U r m
O
O
Z
N
O
M
n
N
O
(O
W
N
N
o1
m
a
M
mx
a
c
L
m
x�
c a
o
o
U
m
o
m
o
a
o
M
o
ro
w
M
9 V
O
N
LQ
10
V
Z
O
M
M
O
V
n
n
Nj
N N
N
N m
cc
fA
2
m
O
p0
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
V
O
V
O
Z
O
v
O
O
V
n
O
N
V
N
O
p
MO
W
N
M
O
O
O
O
n
n
0
m
Q
m
V
O
m
mp
O
o
O
v
o
IN
Z
v
o
0
M
O
y
y
V
V
v
y
O
N
N
M
M
O
N
o.
O
n
m
Q
m
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
Z
m
O
O
O
O
y
v
v
v
v
v
y
N
NO
Z
m
O'
N
o
O
o
O
O
y
o
p0
0]
m
v
O
V
NN
(h
m0
o
O
O
N
n
O
N
Q
M
M
M
m
yj
NO
O
O
O
p
O
'
Omo
Z
m
O
o
0
m
O
y
O
v
o
V
v
O
Ov
m
o
O
6
v
v
V
O
v
v
V
O
N
7
O
00
O
O
N
N
11')
Q
a
�
MO
m
N
O
O
O
p
O
v
O
In
O
m
Z
N
v
o
O
p
N
10
p
V
v
V
V
O
M
V
O
o
0
0
O'
Q
m
(m').
MO
O
m
o
M
o
0
6
0
0
o
0
o
10
o
n
Z
a6
0
o
o
0
v
v
M
M
O
o
O
o
O
N
O
O
Q
r
M
m
M
O
O
O
o
O
o
W
Z
m
O
O
O
o
v
OV
v
V
V
O
O
M
M
O
O
O
O
-7
m
Q
N
In
In
m
N
O
p
O
v
O
O
v
O
V
OV
Oy
O
v
Z
m
v
O
O
O
O
v
M
N
m
M
Q
m
y
O
m
O
N
O
p0
p0
p0
O
O
o
w
Z
m
O
O
O
O
v
v
V
O
O
N
v
N
N
O
N
o
o
�2
N
Q
m
V
�2
N
O
O
O
v
O>
x
Z
w
O
O
O
m
O
O
y
v
�
v
o
0
v
N
n
o
00
0
0
o
o
Q
N
a
v
a
m
$
o
o
00
v
0
0o
v
po
v
0
0
0
v
of
z
ai
o
0
o
0
v
M
m
O
O
p0
O
0
0
00
O
m
Z
m
O
o
O
O
v
v
y
V
v
v
O
�
o
N
a
O
m
v
o
O
o
z
o
0
0
0
0
0
n
v
0
0
v
n
N
e
O
O
n
O
L
m
a
=
a
a
¢
w
¢
a
a
O
^
w
m
w
O
w
a
w
r
a
H
w
L
m
o
t
O
U
N
cL
O
O
L
0
W
_
^
a
16
d
c
aci
¢
m
N
V
E
d
d
N
W
N
O
N
N
N
c
U
O
O
E
Z`
d
r
d
o
o
o
d
£
E
E
a
OaC
ac
v
y
N
M
G
Q
m
z
C
LL
OUC
Q
a�0
U
U
U
(�
(n

A-4CC
Area 2
A-6,..
4
LEGEND
- Soil Boring
Cross Section Traverse
Excavation Cell Limit
and Avenue
• 51 �
■
S
I�
A-10 : )
�A-7 Area 4
A 11G _
A-8
A-13
4rea 3
A-14') Area 5
A-9
A-15
W. Peace Street
0 30 60
1 inch = 60 ft.
PROJECT #: 49-04841
Seaboard Station
DRAWN BY: TL 18 Seaboard Ave. & 721 Halifax St
CHECKED BY: CJ Raleigh, NC 27617
PROJECT MGR: CJ
DATE: August 6, 2020
Block A Figure
REVISED: ----
Cross Section Transect Map
SCALE: 1"=60' 3
PRINTED: 8/6/20204: 10 PM G:\DWG\49-04841-1 Seaboard Station\Cross Sections

A A'
34 outh Area 2 Area 1 a' No h
340
33 Building 330
a 320-3 iD a a a a 320
o
a 31 310
a 30 300
E
o 29 290
a
28 1280
B B'
South > North
_ Area 3 a
34 340
o
33 330
a
32 3 a a l.a 320
o0.61
a 31 310
0.38
a 30 300
E
- 29 290
a 28 280
C v C'
— South a' North
34 Area 5 Area 4 340
o
33 v < 330
3 a a2.
da —
r? 32 a — 1.8 099 320
0.8s
0.e6
31 0.76 022i 310
0. 991
30 300
E
° 29 290
a
28 280
LEGEND
PSRG - Residential Preliminary Soil Remediation Goal
Mg/Kg - Milligrams per Kilogram
0.19 J - Composite Sample Concentration (units mg/Kg)
J - Below the Reporting Limit but Above the Method's Detection Limit and are Estimated Results
BOIL - Below Detection Level
1,8 - Composite Sample Concentration (Bold) Above Residential PSRG
- Arsenic Concentrations Above Residential Preliminary Soil Remediation Goal (PSRG)
- Soil Below (PSRG)
a - Soil Boring (Projected onto Cross Section Traverse)
PROJECT#: 49-04841
Client: Seaboard Station
DRAWN By: TL Site Location:18 Seaboard Ave. & 721 Halifax St
CHECKED By: CJ Raleigh, NC 27617
C PROJECT MGR Cl
0 15 30 DATE: August 6, 2020
Figure
REVISED: Block A Cross Sections
1 inch =30 ft. SCALE: 1"=30' /�
PRINTED: 8/6/20204:10PM G:%—\-0 s-...e srai-wross s--, �}

M:
B-37 •?
W Frank* Street
— i B-5
Area 1 B-2 Area 2
B-4
B-6
B-1
B-10
B-11
B-3
Area 4
B-16
Area 13
Area 6
"B-38
C`B-18
B-39
LEGEND
Soil Boring
Cross Section Traverse
Excavation Cell Limit
,B-25
Area 9
I • B-26
." B-27
!-: B-3
B-19
B-20
B-21 n
Area 7
8-28 Area 10
0 B-29
_jjArea2
1
Seaboard Avenue �
0 30 60
1 inch =60 ft.
PROJECT #: 49-04841
Client: Seaboard Station
DRAWN BY: TL Site Location: 18 Seaboard Ave. & 721 Halifax St
CHECKED BY: CJ Raleigh, NC 27617
PROJECT MGR: CJ
DATE: August 6, 2020
Block B Figure
REVISED: ----
Cross Section Transect Map
SCALE: 1"=60' C
PRINTED: 8/6/20204:10 PM G:\DWG\49-04841-1SeaboardStation\Cross Sections „J

v
t.O
11
00 O O O 00 001 0 N
0 M ON 00 O 0 00 W O
0
N �
n
;—;5 u111u. j .M o
c ^ �
o
« v N
8 m0 Z
0 � y m "e
Y
O
c o m
v,
m J _
L£ 8 Q
L Ci
Ol
3
O
Q
z
S—
o u o
ST
0
x
0
m
E -
M.
E
C 0 V W
LZ8 m� o
6 6 >
7 E E —
`o ° c
E
E o Q u z o
W, V C V
N L - G
'any p[eogea5 'any p�eogea5 Z E �'£- c a `o
0' W. EYat mw«� a
O o - E a o E E v .Q
O m 00 M N A 0 m 00 4+ " �0 2 a
°' w v �—
C E~ L D r u° UC
0 vO0 EooEEw= -
Z
z� umm u°u° a�0 �°LU
W
ado^m�0�� [zs
J G

v
�1 n
1
V OM N O OOi W
/^
M M M M M N N vZ
O 18a;lS ulIgueJB'M
Z n
;aa�1S ui��ue�j .M
2
N �
n �
5- L-9 c ai N N
« v N
` Z O
-o Z0 co
c
`at U
b-9 vvi�z U -
O
c o m
0 8 9 U N =
Gl
in
3
a
OT-8 O
Ti 8
bL fl
£T-8
m G z
o u
fl ST-8
£Z 8
0
x
TZ-8 ~
ZZ 8
bZ 8 0
8Z o
Z£ -
Sf
i
E
c 0
bf E `w w
0 -
z o
Tf-8 0
£ _
--
7 Z�
0 ° 0
-00
E oa
N � o
zEEE ° c
0en>a�`2'
'any pjeogea5 'any pleogea5 E .�°-� - r -, c
E n v
`o E `w
L L v h _
LLB ' �E„ ='o
N T M M M M N N M M m m M N N D E O O E d m m
C 2 12 U N� Na V Q N
Zi
uj
0 'n -o a AII9E8
�

® ®� SEABOARD STATION
BLOCKS A & B C'Ln
STEWART BELOW GRADE LEVEL2E

me
® ®� SEABOARD STATION
BLOCKS A & B C'Ln
STEWART BELOW GRADE LEVEL1E

® SEABOARD STATION
®� BLOCKS A & B C'Ln
STEWART GROUND LEVEL (1 OF 2) E

® SEABOARD STATION
®� BLOCKS A & B
STEWART GROUND LEVEL (2 OF 2) E.

® ®� SEABOARD STATION
BLOCKS A & B
ST E WA RT p E S I N ® TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN - LEVELS 2-6E.

Phase 1-Lower Level
October 23, 2018
1
Lk
Total of all Phases
Rao Amenity
Retail (NSF)
Hotel(GSF)
Residential(GSF)
(GSF)
Pa,king(GSF)
Phase IA
12,660
77,825
86,935
7,450
86,900
Phase 19
32,220
303,635
15,590
151,160
Phase 11
45,675
234,205
7,895
186,390
Totals
90,555
77,825
624,775
30,935
424,450
r-N ma
STEWART
Raleigh, NC FLORIAN COMPANTS

Phase 1 - Street Level
Total of all Phases
Retail(HSF)
Hotel(GSF)
Residential(GSF)
Rao Amenity
(GSF)
Parking(GSF)
Phase IA
12,660
77,825
86,935
7,450
86,900
Phase lB
320220
303,635
15,590
151,160
Phase II
451675
234,205
7,895
186,390
Totals
90,555
77,825
624,775
30,935
424,450
1i a
October 23, 2018
2
6-N
-' r®
STEWART
Raleigh, NC
FLORIAN COMPANTS

Phase 1 - Street Level
ha
mm
IMIll
October 23, 2018
3
FLORIAN COMPANTS
$to-W5TwUDM10 STEWART Raleigh, NC

Phase 1 - Upper Level
ha
mm
IMIll
October 23, 2018
4
111
FLORIAN COMPANTS
$to-W5TwuDM10 STEWART Raleigh, NC

Phase 1 - Typical Upper Level
mm
IMIll
October 23, 2018
5
1
FLORIAN COMPANTS
$to-W5TwuDM10 STEWART Raleigh, NC

Phase 2-Lower Level
October 23, 2018
6
Total of all Phases
Rao Amenity
Retail (NSF)
Hotel(GSF)
Residential(GSF)
(GSF)
Pa,king(GSF)
Phase IA
12,660
77,825
86,935
7,450
86,900
Phase 19
32,220
303,635
15,590
151,160
Phase 11
45,675
234,205
7,895
186,390
Totals
90,555
77,825
624,775
30,935
424p50
111
6-N r-wa
STEWART
Raleigh, NC
FLORIAN COMPANTS

Phase 2 - Street Level
hi
October 23, 2018
7
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
mm
IMIll�
111
FLORIAN COMPANTS
$to-M STEWART Raleigh, NC

Phase 2 - Street Level
hi
W.
mm
IMIll
October 23, 2018
8
FLORIAN COMPANTS
$to-W5TwUDM10 STEWART Raleigh, NC

Phase 2 - Upper Level
W.
Total of all Phases
Retail(HSF)
Hotel(GSF)
Residential(GSF)
Rao Amenity
(GSF)
Parking(GSF)
Phase IA
12,660
77,825
86,935
7,450
86,900
Phase lB
320220
303,635
15,590
151,160
Phase II
451675
234,205
7,895
186,390
Totals
90,555
77,825
624,775
30,935
424,450
1i I
October 23, 2018
9
6-N
-' r®
STEWART
Raleigh, NC FLORIAN COMPANTS

Phase 2 - Typical Upper Level
October 23, 2018
10
Total of all Phases
Roo Amenity
Retail (NSF)
Hotel(GSF)
Residential (GSF)
(GSF)
Parking(GSF)
Phase IA
12,660
77,825
86,935
7,450
86,900
Phase IB
32,220
303,635
15,590
151,160
Phase 11
45,675
234,205
7,895
186,390
Totals
90,555
77,825
624,775
30,935
424,450
FLORIAN COMPANTS
$to-W5TwuDM10 STEWART Raleigh, NC

ON 'HOGIVa 3AV CIUVOSV3S 9
=
V 19MJ`dd - NOliViS (h]V09V9
9
631VIOOSSVVNVW330H
p
p
I

......... ..
I'll o.
0
0
< < 0
LU U) 00
Id
23
KOH

U
O
co
LLJ
o
0
0
a0
0
c0
0
N
00
/�
.M
CO
S
E
N
N
O
co
O
o
}0
>
`U
YJ
a)
W
o
p)
0
7
o
o
OD
0
(O
o
N
W
E
N
N
N
a�
n
L
3
0
w
W
O
uipQOo�
OW dam
ggw~>
N>
O
U w Z 0
Y
Z
uO 6
Q W
UO
O
W
(n
U 0 Q W
Z
WO ~ M >
' O
0W—WU
�U
Z
j W 0 Z
V O
m
> Z O m
Q L Q
F
00
Z
Q W
W N 9
02
U Q L
�H
w Z j
OW m=0
W
cnu)
Uo O Z
U)� m a
Z Q
LO FL 0
M
QU
LL
J Z m W
O 0
rm OU
w�FOa
>Qcn
Z
CO n
LLI 00OO
CO
WO a�
x
U OmYD
o a
=�Z
OLU zO> �W
> OU
0a--iw�
0
wzaommNm0W 66m
x O
W Z
-----------------------------
N
M
�cvdr�tb tr — M —
r
I—
O
Z
<
hqhb,
W
I
H
N
O
O
. ^
v
0
`n
o
LO
I
I
LO
N
�I
�
ui
J
Q
ai
o
H
/
1
N rc o
.LLl.
N
y3`Y
e
�I
I
w w
i mow/ I
I
w m a��„
am
a
b
ao�
I
w
o\
co^
0-
C)
Q
w
o
L
/
_
I\
i
po
m
w
co
Q
LV
r
X
>
�_p-�
�w
z

t- -
r
(n
W
2 U
O
CL
a N
D o
LL LL N
LL
J �
y
y A Ifj
M
LL
a Y
to
U y y
y d 3
> > w
2 M VJ F
1 m
,
�f7 fD OD
N M
N �N4 N

6
ISMI