23020 Beltex Mill EMP 20190715

#1269 Engineering
#C-245 Geology

Environmental Management Plan
Beltex Mill
Belmont, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 23020-19-036
July 16, 2019
H&H Job No. DRY-003
CONTENTS
Completed EMP Template Form
Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Summary of Soil Analytical Data
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data
Summary of Sub-Slab Vapor Analytical Data
Summary of Indoor Air Analytical Data
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Site Location Map
Sample Location Map
Appendix
Appendix A Proposed Subsurface Construction Activities
Table 4

1
EMP Version 2, June 2018
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.

The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory-compliant
decision-making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.

Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development-related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project,
and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be
cause for a reopener

So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.

☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.
☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.

2
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:

☐ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.

☒ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.

☐ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.

☐ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
on site after construction grading.

☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).

☐ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.

☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☐ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.

☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.

☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.

☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.

☐ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.

☐ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.

3
EMP Version 2, June 2018
GENERAL INFORMATION

Date: 7/16/2019 Revision Date (if applicable): Click or tap to enter a date.

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Beltex Mill

Brownfields Project Number: 23020-19-036

Brownfields Property Address: 130 Performance Drive, Belmont, Gaston County

Brownfields Property Area (acres): 22.45
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.

COMMUNICATIONS

A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.

Prospective Developer (PD): WXLY, LLC and Dry Pro Basement Systems, Inc.
Contact Person: Ron Weatherly
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-523-9111 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: [e-mail]

Contractor for PD: Click or tap here to enter text.
Contact Person: Click or tap here to enter text.
Phone Numbers: Office: Click or tap here to enter text. Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: Click or tap here to enter text.

Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC
Contact Person: Matt Bramblett, PE
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-586-0007 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Brownfields Program Project Manager: Bill Schmithorst
Phone Numbers: Office: 919-707-8159 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: [e-mail]

Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,

4
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
Click or tap here to enter text.

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:

On-site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior ☒

Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior ☒

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours ☒

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours ☒

Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior ☒

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days ☒

REDEVELOPMENT PLANS

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☐Residential ☐Recreational ☐Institutional ☐Commercial ☐Office ☐Retail ☒Industrial
☐Other specify:
Click or tap here to enter text.

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth-moving activities
at the site:
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
☒ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
☒ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors

3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
The Site is currently developed and large-scale development or demolition is not planned.

5
EMP Version 2, June 2018
However, utility installation and building updates that will disturb soil at the Site are proposed.
The proposed activities include installation of subgrade plumbing and power utilities and
construction of a loading ramp located on the western portion of the building. The construction
of the loading ramp will require the installation of footer to approximately 1.5 ft below ground
surface. Locations of proposed subgrade construction activities and construction plans are
included in Appendix A. A parking lot may be constructed later that will generally be placed
above existing grade.

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
☐ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.

5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
☐ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.

6) Which category of risk-based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
☐ Residential ☒ Non-Residential or Industrial/Commercial

7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 8/9/2019

b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
August 2019 to October 2019

c) Additional phases planned? ☐ Yes ☐ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: No other phases planned with a known timeframe
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.

6
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: No new buildings are anticipated at
this time

CONTAMINATED MEDIA

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil:……………………………………….……………. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater:.……………………….……..……. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water:.……………...……..…………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment:.……………...……..…………………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor:…..…………...……..…………………. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 6. Sub-Slab Soil Vapor:……...……..…………….. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air:...……..…………………………………. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.

PART 1. Soil – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.

1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
A tabular summary of available soil sample analytical data in comparison to the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary
Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) is included as Table 1 and soil sample locations are shown in
Figure 2. Previous soil sampling conducted at the Site has indicated concentrations of
methylene chloride at levels below PSRGs. The detections are likely a result of laboratory
contamination and no other contaminants have been identified in Site soil.
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Soil samples containing methylene chloride were collected from depths ranging from 1 to 7 feet
below ground surface (ft bgs). 3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
As indicated above, large scale redevelopment is not planned. Currently proposed utility trench
locations and the location of the proposed loading ramp are provided in Appendix A.

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):

7
EMP Version 2, June 2018
No greater than approximately 8 ft bgs for planned utility work.

5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
Mass grading or excavation is not planned at the site. Approximately 15 cubic yards of soil will
be excavated in the as part of the footer installation for the loading ramp construction

6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
Excavation of impacted soil is not anticipated.

7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
Excavation of impacted soil is not anticipated.

Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ☐Yes ☒No
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained-Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained-In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes ☐ No

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED-OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED-IN POLICY THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes ☒ No
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
☐ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text.

8
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ If no, explain rationale:
Soil analytical data does not indicate detections capable of exceeding toxicity
characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) criteria using the Rule of 20.

d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
☐ Preliminary Health-Based Residential SRGs
☒ Preliminary Health-Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
☒ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
☐ Site-specific risk-based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Click or tap here to enter text.

Additional comments:
Click or tap here to enter text.

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known
☒ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☒
☒ Describe cap or fill:
In the unlikely event impacted soil is encountered during construction activities above risk-
based levels, the impacted soil will be placed beneath impervious surfaces (asphalt
pavement, sidewalks, access roads, buildings, etc.) or a minimum of 2 ft of clean fill.

9
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-recorded if
actions are Post-Recordation).
☒ GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
☐ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:

4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
☒ Yes, describe the method will include:
During construction activities, the on-Site contractors will consider conditions such as wind
speed, wind direction, and moisture content of soil during excavation and stockpiling
activities to minimize dust generation. In the unlikely event that potentially contaminated
soil is encountered during such work, particular attention will be paid by contractors to
implement dust control measures as needed based on Site and atmospheric conditions (i.e.
by controlled water application, hydro-seeding, and/or mulch, stone, or plastic cover).
Potentially impacted soil will be managed as described below.

☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Field Screening of site soil
☒ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
During soil disturbance at the Site, the workers or contractors will observe soils for
evidence of suspected impacts. Evidence of suspected impacted soil includes a distinct
unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e.
chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be noted during Site work, the contractor
will contact the project environmental professional to observe the suspect condition. If
the project environmental professional confirms that the material may be impacted
through professional judgement and/or organic vapor analyzer screening, then the
procedures below will be implemented. In addition, the DEQ Brownfields project manager
will be contacted within 48 hours to advise of the condition. If the environmental
professional determines through professional judgement or screening of soils that soil
sampling and analyses are necessary, the environmental professional will subsequently
prepare a brief, PE/PG sealed report, sufficiently describing the location, investigation, lab
results, and soil management.

☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Soil Sample Collection
☐ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in-situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
Click or tap here to enter text.

10
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ No, explain rationale:
Collection of additional soil samples is not anticipated based on results of previous Site
assessment activities. If suspected soil impacts are encountered during excavation and/or
installation or removal of utilities or other construction activities, excavation will proceed
only as far as needed to allow for such work to continue and/or only as far as needed to
allow alternate corrective measures as described below. Suspect impacted soil excavated
during maintenance/repair, construction, and/or utility line installation or removal may
be stockpiled and covered in a secure area to allow such work to progress. Suspect
impacted soil will be underlain by and covered with minimum 10-mil plastic sheeting. If
the project environmental professional through professional judgement and/or organic
vapor analyzer screening determines the suspected soil is potentially impacted, at least
one representative sample of the soil will be collected for analysis as listed below. If the
results of analysis of the sample indicate that the soil could potentially exceed toxicity
characteristic hazardous waste criteria, then the soil will also be analyzed by TCLP for
those compounds that could exceed the toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria.
Impacted soil will be handled in the manner described below based upon the laboratory
analyses:
i. If no organic compounds are detected in a sample (other than which are
attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts) and metals are below IHSB Industrial
PSRGs, thresholds based on risk calculations, or are consistent with background levels,
then the soil will be deemed suitable for use as on-Site fill. If soil export is necessary, the
procedures in Part 1.C. will be followed.
ii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed IHSB Industrial
PSRGs or thresholds based on risk calculations (other than which are attributable to
sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with Site-specific background
levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then
the soil may be used on-Site as fill without conditions.
iii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the IHSB Industrial
PSRGs or thresholds based on risk calculations (other than which are attributable to
sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with background levels for
metals) and the TCLP concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil,
with DEQ’s written approval, may be used on-Site as fill below an impervious surface, or
at least 2 ft of compacted clean soil. If the impacted soil with concentrations above IHSB
Industrial PSRGs is moved to an on-Site location, the impacted soil will be placed beneath
at least 2 ft of compacted clean soil or an impervious surface and will be covered with a
geotechnical fabric so its location can be identified in the future, and its location and
depth will be documented and presented to DEQ on an updated survey plat.
iv. As noted in Part 1.C., impacted soil may be transported to a permitted facility such
as a landfill provided that the soil is accepted at the disposal facility. In the unlikely event
that the sample data indicates concentrations above TCLP hazardous waste criteria, then

11
EMP Version 2, June 2018
the soil must be transported off-site to a permitted disposal facility that can accept or
treat hazardous waste.

If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): EPA Methods 6020/7471
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199

☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:

☐ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (Check all that apply):
☐ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☐ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Click or tap here to enter text.

12
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Click or tap here to enter text.

Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, a work plan for
final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ If final grade sampling was NOT selected please explain rationale:
Significant Site redevelopment and soil disturbance are not currently anticipated. Currently
planned construction activities will be conducted in limited areas at the Site that are
predominantly covered with impervious surfaces such as concrete or asphalt. Therefore,
final grade sampling will not be conducted during the upcoming maintenance/repair work.
However, following completion of any future Site development (i.e., after grading), an
environmental professional will be contracted to assess the Site for areas that are not
covered with clean fill soil, building foundations, sidewalks, or asphalt or concrete parking
areas and driveways, or other similar impervious areas. If such areas exist, a plan will be
prepared for final grade sampling for DEQ Brownfields review and approval. If no such
areas exist, documentation will be provided to the DEQ Brownfields project manager.

Part 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL

NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner.”

Requirements for importing fill:

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
170 cubic yards

3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range
of depths, please list the range.)
Soil will be imported to the Site to build up the grade below the concrete surface of the proposed
loading ramp. The soil will be installed from ground surface up to approximately 5 ft above grade.

4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,

13
EMP Version 2, June 2018
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
Click or tap here to enter text.

5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use at the Brownfields property.
Prior to placement at the site, import soil will be submitted for laboratory analysis at a rate of 1
sample per every 500 cubic yards or a Brownfield “pre-approved” import site will be utilized.
Proposed laboratory analyses of the import fill from non-Brownfield “pre-approved” sites are
provided below.

DEQ approval of the analytical results will be obtained prior to transporting import soil to the
Site.

6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): EPA Methods 6020/7471
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199

7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in-situ
borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought
onto the Brownfields Property.
Click or tap here to enter text.

Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN

14
EMP Version 2, June 2018
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.

1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.
Should soil need to be exported from the Brownfields property, a sampling plan will be
developed and submitted to DEQ Brownfields for review and approval once the volume of soil
for export is known. Generally, soil samples will be collected from export soil at a rate of 1
sample per every 400-500 cubic yards of export.

DEQ approval of the sampling plan and analytical results will be obtained prior to transporting
export soil from the Site. Based on analytical results of soil samples collected from the export
soil, the soil will be transported off-Site to a suitable location. The PD will notify DEQ
Brownfields of the location receiving the export soil. If not a permitted facility, DEQ Brownfields
approval and written approval from the receiving facility will be obtained prior to transporting
the soil off-Site.

2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
☒ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
☒ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting Landfill;
☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility
☒ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property – determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and that a record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
☒ Use as Beneficial Fill off-site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.

3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).
The environmental professional will contact DEQ Brownfields to obtain DEQ Brownfields and
DEQ Solid Waste approval prior to exporting soil to a non-Brownfields property or non-
permitted disposal facility, as appropriate.

15
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES

☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)

☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original
depth from which it was excavated.

☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ If no, include rationale here:
Previous assessment conducted at the Site does not indicate that soil vapor is a concern.

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Although not anticipated, in the event contaminated soil and/or vapor is encountered in utility
trenches during construction or maintenance/repair activities, the trench will be evacuated and
appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be performed to protect workers. If results indicate
further action is warranted in response to vapors to protect workers, appropriate engineering
controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.

The contractor and workers will observe soil for potential impacts during utility work at the Site.
Evidence of potential suspected impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled
or previously disposed materials of concern (i.e. chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be
noted during utility work, the contractor will contact the project environmental professional to
observe the suspect condition and screen the soil using a photo-ionization detector (PID) or other
similar vapor field screening instrument. If the project environmental professional confirms that the
material may be impacted, then the procedures outlined in Managing On-Site Soil above (Part 1.A.)
will be implemented. In addition, the environmental professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields
project manager within 48 hours to advise of the condition.

PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below.
1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
Previous assessment activities conducted at the Site indicates that groundwater is
approximately 30 to 35 ft bgs.
2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☐onsite ☐offsite ☐both or ☒unknown
sources? Describe source(s):

16
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) has been detected at concentrations exceeding the 15A North
Carolina Administrative Code 2L Groundwater Standard in a groundwater samples collected from
a temporary well (TMW-1) installed north of the Site building near a manhole oil pit. It is
unknown whether the impacts originated from the Site property. The McAdenville Dump pre-
regulatory landfill site abuts the Site property to the northwest, and wastes from the
McAdenville Dump were recently removed from the western portion of the Site. PCE has not
been identified in Site soil during assessment activities, and former industrial properties and the
McAdenville Dump are in close proximity to the Site, such that an off-Site source of the dissolved
PCE is possible.

A summary of groundwater analytical data is provided in Table 2 and locations of groundwater
samples collected at the Site are shown in Figure 2.

3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
The direction of groundwater flow at the Site has not been verified. However, because the site is
located on a topographic high groundwater is expected to flow in multiple directions away from
the Site building.
4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
☐Yes ☒No
If yes, describe these activities:
Click or tap here to enter text. Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or sampling procedures).
Based on the anticipated depth to groundwater, groundwater is not anticipated to be
encountered during proposed maintenance/repair or utility construction activities. Although
not anticipated at this time, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken if
groundwater gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted (based
on strong odor, unnatural color, sheen, etc.) during such activities. The contractor will contact
the environmental professional to observe the suspected condition. The accumulated water
will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent that the time for dissipation does not
disrupt the work schedule. Should the time needed for natural dissipation of accumulated
water be deemed inadequate, the water will be tested and disposed off-Site (if impacted), or
tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ surface water standards)
in accordance with applicable municipal and State regulations for erosion control and
construction stormwater control.

5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☐Yes ☒No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes ☐No

6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously

17
EMP Version 2, June 2018
unidentified wells.
☐ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program’s intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
☐ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
☐ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
☒ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.

7) Please provide additional details as needed:

Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.

PART 3. SURFACE WATER -Please fill out the information below.
1) Is surface water present at the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes ☒ No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
If surface water run-off gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted
during maintenance/repair or construction activities, appropriate worker safety measures will be
undertaken. The accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent that
the time for dissipation does not disrupt the work schedule. Should the time needed for natural
dissipation of accumulated water be deemed inadequate, the water will be tested and disposed
off-Site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ
surface water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and State regulations for
erosion control and construction stormwater control.

Click or tap here to enter text.

18
EMP Version 2, June 2018
PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below.

1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No

2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No

3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No

4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.

5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
Not Applicable.

PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below.
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
Groundwater:.….☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
Groundwater:…..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?

4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities
(trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management
of such contact:
In the unlikely event contaminated soil vapors are encountered during future
One soil gas point (SG-1) was installed to a depth of 5 ft bgs on the northern portion of the Site, near
the McAdenville Dump property boundary, for field screening of landfill gases. Methane and hydrogen
sulfide were not identified in the soil gas point. Carbon dioxide (1.4%), oxygen (19.4%), and carbon
monoxide (2 parts per million) were detected in the soil gas point. VOC sampling has not been
conducted in soil gas points at the Site.

19
EMP Version 2, June 2018
maintenance/repair or construction activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety
screening of the vapors will be performed. If results indicate further action is warranted,
appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.

PART 6. SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.
1) Are sub-slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
2) If data indicate that sub-slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map
showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub-slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☐0-6 inches ☒Other, please
describe:
A total of seven sub-slab vapor samples were collected at the Site. Two of the seven sub-slab
vapor sample were collected beneath the basement slab located in the northern portion of the
Site building. The estimated depth of the samples collected in the basement were approximately
9 ft below site grade. One of the sub-slab samples collected in the basement contained a
concentration of PCE above the IHSB Residential Soil Gas Screening Level (SGSL) screening level
but below the IHSB Non-Residential SGSL. No other compounds were detected above IHSB
Residential or Non-Residential SGLSs in the sub-slab samples collected.

A summary of sub-slab soil vapor data collected at the site is included on Table 3, and locations of
the sub-slab soil gas points are shown on Figure 2.

4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub-slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list activities for management of such contact
In the unlikely event impacted soil vapors are encountered during future maintenance/repair or
construction activities, worker breathing zone will be monitored using a calibrated
photoionization detector. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering
controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.

PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below.
1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk-based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated

20
EMP Version 2, June 2018
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:

VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM – Please fill out the information below.
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☐ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
Click or tap here to enter text. VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer
If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
Previous assessment results for the property do not indicate a vapor intrusion concern based on
indoor air concentrations. Additionally, the PCE concentration in soil vapor exceeds the
residential screening level, but cumulative carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks are within
EPA and DEQ acceptable levels. There are no plans to redevelopment the Site for residential use

CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials

In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this EMP.
In the unlikely event there is evidence of potential indoor air issues (i.e. unusual odors) during future
construction activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the indoor air
will be performed. If warranted during such work, screening procedures will include periodically
screening indoor air for volatile organic vapors with a calibrated photoionization detector. If results
indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans)
will be implemented.

A summary of previous indoor air analytical data collected at the site is included on Table 4, and
locations of the indoor air samples are shown on Figure 2.

21
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site-specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
EPA Methods 6020/7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199 Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
During maintenance/repair or construction activities, contractors may encounter unknown sub-
surface environmental conditions (i.e. tanks, drums, or waste materials) that if encountered, will
require proper management. Prior to beginning such work, H&H or the PD will discuss this EMP
with the contractors. This discussion will include the various scenarios when it would be necessary
to notify H&H of the discovery of unknown subsurface features or potentially impacted media at
the Site.

In the event that such conditions are encountered during maintenance/repair or construction
activities, the environmental actions noted below will be used.

Underground Storage Tanks:
In the event a UST or impacts associated with a UST release are discovered at the Site during
maintenance/repair or construction activities, the UST and/or UST related impacts will likely be
addressed through the Brownfields Program. If beneficial to the project, the UST can be addressed
under UST regulations.

If a UST is encountered and cannot be removed for geotechnical or construction purposes, it will be
abandoned in-place (with DEQ’s prior prompt approval) such that work can proceed. If abandoned

22
EMP Version 2, June 2018
in place, samples will be collected in accordance with DEQ UST Section protocols. If the UST is
removed, it will be properly removed and disposed and appropriate risk-based sampling will be
conducted beneath the tank. If the UST contains residual petroleum fluids, the fluids will be
sampled for VOCs and SVOCs and removed. If the fluid is waste oil, the fluid will also be analyzed
for RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium. Following characterization, the fluids will be
transported off-Site for disposal at a suitable facility based on the laboratory analytical results.
Impacted soil will be managed in accordance with Part 1.A. An updated survey plat may be required
depending on the results of the UST work.

Sub-Grade Feature/Pit:
If a sub-grade feature or pit is encountered and does not require removal for geotechnical or
maintenance/repair or construction purposes, it will be filled with soil or suitable fill and work will
proceed. Where appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before back filling to prevent fluid
accumulation. If the pit has waste in it, the waste may be set aside in a secure area and sampled for
waste disposal purposes for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, and TCLP metals. Based on the results, it will
be disposed off-Site at a permitted facility or the waste will be managed in accordance with the
Managing On-Site Soil section outlined above in the EMP, whichever is most applicable based on
the type of waste present. If the pit must be removed and the observed waste characteristics
indicate the concrete may potentially be contaminated to a significant degree, the concrete will be
sampled and analyzed by methods specified by the disposal facility.

Buried Waste Material:
If excavation into buried wastes or suspected impacted soils occurs, the contractor is instructed to
stop work in that location and notify the environmental professional. The environmental
professional will observe the materials and collect samples if warranted. In this event, confirmation
sampling will be conducted at representative locations in the base and the sidewalls of the
excavation after the waste or suspected impacted soil is removed. The confirmation samples will be
analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium. Areas of suspected
contaminated soil that remain at the Site after excavation is complete above the DEQ IHSB
Industrial PSRGs will be managed pursuant to this plan.

Re-Use of Impacted Soils On-Site:
Please refer to description outlined in the Managing On-Site Soil section (Part 1.A.) of the EMP
above.

If unknown, impacted soil is identified on-site, management on-site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on-site.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
Click or tap here to enter text.

23
EMP Version 2, June 2018

POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING

☒ Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 3/18/2020

The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment-related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).

☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement.

**,)0&W-$"(./, -W
JGTE;?9B8MW*JG@97OW(QD69JW   W
JGTE;?9B8MW*JG@97OW(5D9W:CP:UW'>CCW


*JGMI97O?S9W9S9BGI9JW23&4W&&W5E8WLVW*JGW5M9D9EOW-VMO9DMW$E7W 5O9W


W
*J?EO98W(5D9.?OB9GDI5EVW'JW,GEW295O=9JBVW


GEMQBO5EOW#5JOW
W#?7AD5EW*W 5O9W


W
*J?EO98W(5D9.?OB9GDI5EVW'5OOWJ5D6B9OOW* *J?E7?I5BW
JGTE;?9B8MW*JG@97OW'5E5<9J?BBW-7=D?O=GJMOW 5O9W


W
W
!'+W1:KN>HFWW%RF:WW


25
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Table 1Summary of Soil Analytical DataBeltex MillBelmont, North CarolinaH&H Job No. DRY-003Sample IDSB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4Depth (ft)5-7 3-5 3-5 1-2VOCs (8260B/5035A) mg/kgMethylene chloride0.025 58 650 6.2 J 5.5 J<23.07.5 JPAHs (8270D) mg/kg-- -- --BRL BRL BRL BRLTPH-DRO (8015C) mg/kg-- -- --<5.5 NA NA NATPH-GRO (8015C) mg/kg-- -- --<5.0 NA NA NANotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (May 2019).For VOCs, only those compounds detected in at least one sample shown above.Methylene Chloride is likely laboratory-introduced contaminantMethod number follows parameter in parenthesismg/kg = milligrams/kilogram; SB = Soil BoringVOCs = volatile organic compoundsTPH-DRO = diesel range total petroleum hydrocarbonsTPH-GRO = gasoline range total petroleum hydrocarbonsPAHs = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsBRL = below reporting limitNA = not analyzed, -- = not applicableDEQ IHSB Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1) (mg/kg)DEQ IHSB Residential Use PSRGs (1) (mg/kg)DEQ IHSB Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1) (mg/kg)S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dry Pro Basement Systems (DRY)\DRY-003\Tables\EMP Data Tables6/28/2019Table 1Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data Beltex MillBelmont, North CarolinaH&H Job No. DRY-003Sample IDTMW-1 WSW-1 TMW-2 TMW-3TMW-DUP (3)Field BlankDate10/13/2018 10/12/2018 4/18/2019 4/19/2019 4/19/2019 4/19/2019VOCs (8260B) µg/LBromodichloromethane 0.6 38<1.01.6BRL BRL BRL BRL4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) NE 1,900,000<5.00.60 JBRL BRL BRL BRLTetrachlorothene 0.7 4877.7<1.0 BRL BRL BRL BRLTrichloroethene 3 4.40.81 J<1.0BRL BRL BRL BRLToluene 600 16,000 0.27 J<1.0BRL BRL BRL BRLXylenes 500 320<1.01.1 JBRL BRL BRL BRLSVOCs (8270) µg/L-- --BRL (only PAHs analyzed)BRL (only PAHs analyzed)BRL BRL NA NARCRA Metals (6020/7470) Total µg/LArsenic 10--NA NA0.496 J 0.526 JNA NABarium 700--NA NA67.2 11.1NA NACadmium 2--NA NA <0.160 <0.160 NA NAChromium 10--NA NA4.38 6.57NA NALead 15--NA NA1.02 J<0.240 NA NAMercury 1 0.75NA NA <0.0490 <0.0490 NA NASelenium 20--NA NA0.409 J 0.718 JNA NASilver 20--NA NA <0.310 <0.310 NA NARCRA Metals (6020/7470) Dissolved µg/LArsenic 10--NA NA <0.2500.423 JNA NABarium 700--NA NA26.6 7.81NA NACadmium 2--NA NA <0.160 <0.160 NA NAChromium 10--NA NA <0.5400.709 JNA NALead 15--NA NA0.893 J<0.240 NA NAMercury 1 0.75NA NA <0.0490 <0.0490 NA NASelenium 20--NA NA <0.380 <0.380 NA NASilver 20--NA NA <0.310 <0.310 NA NANotes:1) North Carolina 15A NCAC 02L Groundwater Standards (NC 2L Standard) (April 2013) 2) North Carolina Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSL) (Feburary 2018)3) TMW-DUP sample was collected from the parent monitoring well TMW-3Method detection limits are shown above for non-detections in 2019; Reporting limits are shown above for non-detections in 2018Bold concentrations exceed the NC 2L StandardBold and underlined exceed the NC 2L Standard and the GWSLConstituents detected in at least one sample are shown above; with the exception of the 8 RCRA metals, refer to the laboratory report Method number follows parameter in parenthesisµg/L = micrograms/literVOCs = volatile organic compoundsSVOCs = semi-volatile organic compoundsPAHs = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsRCRA= Resource Conservation and Recovery ActJ = value above laboratory detection level but below the reporting limit, therefore is an estimationNE = not established; NA = not analyzed; BRL = below reporting limits-- = not applicableNC 2L Standard (1) (µg/L)NC Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion GWSL (2) (µg/L)S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dry Pro Basement Systems (DRY)\DRY-003\Tables\EMP Data Tables6/28/2019Table 2Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3Summary of Sub-Slab Vapor Analytical Data Beltex Mill130 Performance DriveBelmont, North CarolinaH&H Job No. DRY-003Sample LocationSample ID SSSV-1 SSSV-2 SSSV-3 SSSV-4 SSSV-5 SSSV-6SSSV-DUP (SSV-6)SSSV-7Sample Date 3/26/19 3/26/19 3/26/19 3/26/19 3/26/19 3/26/19 3/26/19 3/26/19Units µg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ Acetone16 J3049245014 J8.1 J16 J220,0002,700,0002-Butanone (MEK)14 J4.2 J4.2 J<244.9 J<24<24<2435,000440,000Carbon Tetrachloride1.4<1.3<1.3<1.3<1.3<1.3<1.3<1.31602,000Chloromethane<0.280.88<0.83<0.83<0.83<0.83<0.83<0.836307,900Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)156.8<0.99120<0.993.63.7127008,800Ethanol82 V-05 110 V-05 110 V-05 42 V-05 84 V-05 34 V-05 31 V-05 41 V-05NENEEthylbenzene0.85 J0.78 J<0.87<0.87<0.87<0.87<0.87<0.873704,900Isopropanol3.4 J5.6 J17 J<206.5 J<20<203.9 J1,40018,000Methylene Chloride1.1 J1.1 J<6.9<6.91.7 J<6.90.88 J<6.94,20053,000Naphthalene<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.03.321260Tetrachloroethylene3.29.51240<1.41,0001,0001302803,500Toluene1.91.61.91.21.40.74 J0.950.8735,000440,0001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene<1.5<1.5<1.5<1.5<1.5<1.5<1.52.514180Trichloroethylene<1.1<1.1<1.1<1.1<1.13.94.31.0 J14180Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)2.1 J2.0 J1.3 J1.2 J1.1 J1.1 J1.9 J1.4 JNENEm&p-Xylene1.6 J1.5 J<1.7<1.7<1.7<1.7<1.7<1.77008,800o-Xylene0.73 J0.66 J<0.87<0.87<0.87<0.87<0.87<0.877008,800Notes:Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).1) North Carolina Department of Enviornmental Quality (DEQ) Division of WasteManagement (DWM) Residential Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSL) (February 2018)2) North Carolina Department of Enviornmental Quality (DEQ) Division of WasteManagement (DWM) Non-Residential Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSL) (February 2018)Underline indicates concentration exceeds Non-Residential SGSLNE = Not establishedJ = Compound detected above laboratory method detection limit, but below laboratory reporting limit; and therefore reported value is an estimated value.V-05 = Continuing calibration verification (CCV) did not meet method specifications. Reported value is likely to be biased low.<1.7 = Compound not detected at laboratory reporting limit valueOffice Area Warehouse BasementDWM Residential Sub-Slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening LevelDWM Non-Residential Sub-Slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening LevelS:\AAA-Master Projects\Dry Pro Basement Systems (DRY)\DRY-003\Tables\EMP Data TablesTable 3Hart & Hickman
Table 4Summary of Indoor Air Quality Samples Beltex Mill130 Performance DriveBelmont, North CarolinaH&H Job No. DRY-003Sample LocationAmbient Outdoor AirSample IDIAQ-1 IAQ-2 IAQ-3 IAQ-4 IAQ-5 IAQ-6 IAQ-7IAQ-DUP (IAQ-7)IAQ-BACKGROUNDSample Date3/25/19 3/25/19 3/25/19 3/25/19 3/25/19 3/25/19 3/25/19 3/25/193/25/19Unitsµg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ µg/m³ Acetone2417151614131414116,50027,000Benzene0.61 0.70 0.62 0.59 0.51 0.40 0.75 0.670.310.361.6Benzyl chloride<0.18 <0.18 <0.18 <0.18 <0.18 0.084 J <0.18 <0.18<0.180.0570.25Bromodichloromethane<0.24 <0.24 <0.24 <0.24 <0.24 0.10 J <0.24 <0.24<0.240.7600.33Bromoform<0.36 <0.36 <0.36 <0.36 <0.36 0.17 J <0.36 <0.36<0.362.611Bromomethane<0.14 <0.14 <0.14 <0.14 <0.14 0.16 L-03 <0.14 <0.14<0.141.04.42-Butanone (MEK)6.0 2.2 J 1.8 J 1.9 J 1.9 J 1.9 J 2.4 J 1.9 J2.2 J1,0004,400Carbon Tetrachloride0.49 0.45 0.56 0.58 0.48 0.55 0.57 0.550.480.472Chlorobenzene<0.16 <0.16 <0.16 <0.16 <0.16 0.10 J <0.16 <0.16<0.161044Chloroform<0.17 0.20 0.20 <0.17 <0.17 0.18 <0.17 <0.17<0.170.120.53Chloromethane<0.14 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.20.901979Dibromochloromethane<0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.14 J <0.30 <0.30<0.30NENEDichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)6.4 6.6 4.6 6.2 13 2.5 4.4 4.44.921881,1-Dichloroethane<0.14 <0.14 <0.14 <0.14 <0.14 0.045 J <0.14 <0.14<0.141.87.71,2-Dichloroethane1.2 <0.14 <0.14 <0.14 <0.14 0.14 J <0.14 <0.14<0.140.110.471,2-Dichloropropane0.52 <0.16 <0.16 <0.16 <0.16 <0.16 <0.16 <0.160.058 J0.763.31,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane (Freon 114)<0.25 <0.25 <0.25 0.3 <0.25 0.25 <0.25 <0.25<0.25NENEEthanol42 V-05 27 V-05 10 V-05 14 V-05 11 V-05 10 V-05 31 V-05 22 V-056.9 V-05NENEEthyl Acetate6.0 L-03 <0.13 <0.13 <0.13 <0.13 0.24 L-03 20 L-03 13 L-03<0.131561Ethylbenzene1.0 0.42 0.40 0.39 0.30 0.17 0.55 0.43<0.131.14.94-Ethyltoluene0.45 <0.17 0.42 0.44 0.38 0.17 J 0.46 <0.17<0.17NENEHeptane0.61 <0.14 <0.14 <0.14 <0.14 0.18 <0.14 <0.14<0.1483350Hexachlorobutadiene<0.37 <0.37 <0.37 <0.37 <0.37 0.22 J <0.37 <0.37<0.370.130.56Hexane0.79 J 0.74 J <4.9 0.73 J <4.9 0.32 J 0.57 J <4.9<4.91506102-Hexanone (MBK)<0.14 <0.14 <0.14 <0.14 <0.14 1.0 <0.14 <0.14<0.14626Isopropanol4.2 3.0 J 1.6 J 1.6 J 1.3 J 0.76 J 4.5 3.0 J0.69 J42180Methylene Chloride1.9 0.87 J 0.71 J 0.58 J 0.58 J 0.55 J 1.4 0.95 J0.45 J1005304-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)0.54 <0.14 <0.14 <0.14 <0.14 0.16 <0.14 <0.14<0.146302,600Naphthalene<0.18 <0.18 <0.18 <0.18 <0.18 0.15 J <0.18 <0.18<0.180.0830.36Propene<2.4 <2.4 <2.4 <2.4 <2.4 1.9 J <2.4 <2.4<2.4NENEStyrene<0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 0.54 <0.15<0.152108801,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane<0.24 <0.24 <0.24 <0.24 <0.24 0.12 J <0.24 <0.24<0.240.0481.7Tetrachloroethylene1.8 0.28 0.26 0.26 <0.24 0.40 0.59 0.37<0.208.335Tetrahydrofuran<1.0 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.22 0.64 0.51<0.104201,800Toluene120 7.1 5.2 4.7 3.8 1.5 215.60.381,0004,4001,1,1-Trichloroethane<0.19 <0.19 <0.19 <0.19 <0.19 0.080 J <0.19 <0.19<0.191,0004,400Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)1.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 2.1 1.3 1.5 1.51.4NENE1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (Freon 113)<1.1 <1.1 <1.1 0.66 J 2.1 0.53 J <1.1 <1.11.2NENE1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene0.49 0.51 0.50 0.55 0.46 0.19 0.52 0.46<0.1513531,3,5-Trimethylbenzene<0.17 <0.17 0.20 0.21 <0.17 0.12 J 0.21 0.20<0.151353m&p-Xylene3.2 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.0 0.44 1.6 1.2<0.262188o-Xylene1.3 0.50 0.49 0.49 0.37 0.18 0.60 0.48<0.132188Notes:Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).1)North Carolina Department of Enviornmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste ManagementResidential Indoor Air Screening Levels (IASLs) dated February 2018 (TCR = 1.0E-06 and THQ =0.2)2)North Carolina Department of Enviornmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste ManagementNon-Residential Indoor Air Screening Levels (IASLs) dated February 2018 (TCR = 1.0E-06 and THQ =0.2)Underline indicates concentration exceeds Non-Residential IASL; NE = Not establishedJ = Compound detected above laboratory method detection limit, but below laboratory reporting limit; therefore, reported value is an estimated value.L-05 = Laboratory control sample recovery outside of acceptable limits. Reported value is likely to be biased high.V-05 = Continuing calibration verification (CCV) did not meet method specifications. Reported value is likely to be biased low.<0.17 = Compound not detected at laboratory reporting limit valueOffice Area Warehouse BasementDEQ DWM Residential IASLs DEQ DWM Non-Residental IASLs S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dry Pro Basement Systems (DRY)\DRY-003\Tables\EMP Data TablesTable 4Hart & Hickman
TITLE
PROJECT
SITE LOCATION MAP
INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY
130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE
BELMONT, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
JOB NO:
REVISION NO:
FIGURE:
6/28/2019 0
1DRY-003
SITE
0 2000 4000
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
N
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
MOUNT HOLLY, NORTH CAROLINA, 1993
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. DRY-003
DATE: 10-31-18
FIGURE NO. 2
INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY
130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE
BELMONT, NORTH CAROLINA
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
FORMER LEACHFIELD LINES
CURRENT LEACHFIELD LINES
SEPTIC SYSTEM
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL
LOCATION
SOIL BORING LOCATION
SOIL GAS POINT LOCATION
INDOOR AIR QUALITY SAMPLE
SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR SAMPLE
WATER SUPPLY WELL
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 GeologyMC
A
D
E
N
V
I
L
L
E

RO
A
D
SG-1
SB-4
TMW-1/SB-1
SB-3
SB-2
PERF
O
R
M
A
N
C
E
D
RI
V
E
PERFORMANCE DR
IVE
RAMSEY PRODUCTS
CORPORATION
(135 PERFORMANCE DRIVE)
FORMER BELTEX
CORPORATION
(345 MCADENVILLE ROAD)
MCADENVILLE DUMP
(332 McADENVILLE ROAD)
DUKE ENERGY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY
(130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE)
IAQ-5/SSSV-5
IAQ-6/SSSV-6
IAQ-7/SSSV-7
IAQ-4/SSSV-4
IAQ-3/SSSV-3
IAQ-2/SSSV-2
IAQ-1/SSSV-1
IAQ-BACKGROUND
SEPTIC SYSTEMS (2)
TMW-2
TMW-3
WSW-1

Appendix A
Construction Plans
MINOR ELECTRICAL BOXES
PUMP BOX
PROPOSED 40' CONCRETE
PAD AT DOCK HEIGHT AND
40' RAMP WITH 10' CURB
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. DRY-003
DATE: 6-28-19
APPENDIX A
INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY
130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE
BELMONT, NORTH CAROLINA
PROPOSED SUBSURFACE CONSTRUCTION
------------------------ACTIVITIES
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PROPOSED SUBGRADE POWER TO
GATES
PROPOSED SUBGRADE PLUMBING
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 GeologyPERFORMANCE DR
IVE
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY
(130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE)
PLUMBING GENERAL NOTESPLUMBING MATERIALS AND NOTESPLUMBING LEGENDPLUMBING FIXTURE AND EQUIPMENT SCHEDULEWATER HEATER DETAIL1TRAP GUARD SCHEMATIC2P0.1PLUMBINGLEGEND, NOTESAND SCHEDULE4201-J STUART ANDREW BLVD.CHARLOTTE, NC 28217Cell: 704.305.2770OWNER:PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYISSUE DATEDATEREVISIONFOR CONSTRUCTION3731 Ashton Drive Charlotte, NC 28210 (704) 293-801118285MTATHL06.19.19DRY PRODRY PRO
RENOVATION FOR:
130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE
BELMONT, NC
DOMESTIC WATER DEMOLITION PLAN1DOMESTIC WATER DEMOLITION NOTESP1.1DOMESTIC WATERDEMOLITION PLAN4201-J STUART ANDREW BLVD.CHARLOTTE, NC 28217Cell: 704.305.2770OWNER:PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYISSUE DATEDATEREVISIONFOR CONSTRUCTION3731 Ashton Drive Charlotte, NC 28210 (704) 293-801118285MTATHL06.19.19DRY PRODRY PRO
RENOVATION FOR:
130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE
BELMONT, NC
WASTE AND VENT DEMOLITION NOTESWASTE AND VENT DEMOLITION PLAN1P1.2WASTE AND VENTDEMOLITION PLAN4201-J STUART ANDREW BLVD.CHARLOTTE, NC 28217Cell: 704.305.2770OWNER:PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYISSUE DATEDATEREVISIONFOR CONSTRUCTION3731 Ashton Drive Charlotte, NC 28210 (704) 293-801118285MTATHL06.19.19DRY PRODRY PRO
RENOVATION FOR:
130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE
BELMONT, NC
STORM DRAINAGE DEMOLITION PLAN1P1.3STORM DRAINAGEDEMOLITION PLAN4201-J STUART ANDREW BLVD.CHARLOTTE, NC 28217Cell: 704.305.2770OWNER:PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYISSUE DATEDATEREVISIONFOR CONSTRUCTION3731 Ashton Drive Charlotte, NC 28210 (704) 293-801118285MTATHL06.19.19DRY PRODRY PRO
RENOVATION FOR:
130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE
BELMONT, NC
RECEPTION100CONFERENCE RM104STORAGE101HALLWAY102HALLWAY103OFFICE105OPEN OFFICE106MTG RM107MTG RM108STORAGE109OFFICE110OFFICE111OFFICE116OFFICE117OPEN OFFICE112OFFICE113OFFICE114OFFICE115EXECUTIVE OFFICE118OPEN OFFICE119OFFICE120OFFICE121OFFICE122UNIFORM ROOM123MENSLOCKER RM124MENSTOILET RM125JANITOR 126MENS127WOMENS128IT ROOM129HALLWAY130BREAK ROOM131TRAINING ROOM132MEN133WOMEN134WOMEN135MEN136WAREHOUSE137DOMESTIC WATER NEW WORK PLAN1P1.4DOMESTIC WATERNEW WORK PLAN4201-J STUART ANDREW BLVD.CHARLOTTE, NC 28217Cell: 704.305.2770OWNER:PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYISSUE DATEDATEREVISIONFOR CONSTRUCTION3731 Ashton Drive Charlotte, NC 28210 (704) 293-801118285MTATHL06.19.19DRY PRODRY PRO
RENOVATION FOR:
130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE
BELMONT, NC
RECEPTION100CONFERENCE RM104STORAGE101HALLWAY102HALLWAY103OFFICE105OPEN OFFICE106MTG RM107MTG RM108STORAGE109OFFICE110OFFICE111OFFICE116OFFICE117OPEN OFFICE112OFFICE113OFFICE114OFFICE115EXECUTIVE OFFICE118OPEN OFFICE119OFFICE120OFFICE121OFFICE122UNIFORM ROOM123MENSLOCKER RM124MENSTOILET RM125JANITOR 126MENS127WOMENS128IT ROOM129HALLWAY130BREAK ROOM131TRAINING ROOM132MEN133WOMEN134WOMEN135MEN136WAREHOUSE137WASTE AND VENT NEW WORK PLAN1P1.5WASTE AND VENTNEW WORK PLAN4201-J STUART ANDREW BLVD.CHARLOTTE, NC 28217Cell: 704.305.2770OWNER:PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYISSUE DATEDATEREVISIONFOR CONSTRUCTION3731 Ashton Drive Charlotte, NC 28210 (704) 293-801118285MTATHL06.19.19DRY PRODRY PRO
RENOVATION FOR:
130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE
BELMONT, NC
RECEPTION100CONFERENCE RM104STORAGE101HALLWAY102HALLWAY103OFFICE105OPEN OFFICE106MTG RM107MTG RM108STORAGE109OFFICE110OFFICE111OFFICE116OFFICE117OPEN OFFICE112OFFICE113OFFICE114OFFICE115EXECUTIVE OFFICE118OPEN OFFICE119OFFICE120OFFICE121OFFICE122UNIFORM ROOM123MENSLOCKER RM124MENSTOILET RM125JANITOR 126MENS127WOMENS128IT ROOM129HALLWAY130BREAK ROOM131TRAINING ROOM132MEN133WOMEN134WOMEN135MEN136WAREHOUSE137STORM DRAINAGE NEW WORK PLAN1P1.6STORM DRAINAGENEW WORK PLAN4201-J STUART ANDREW BLVD.CHARLOTTE, NC 28217Cell: 704.305.2770OWNER:PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYISSUE DATEDATEREVISIONFOR CONSTRUCTION3731 Ashton Drive Charlotte, NC 28210 (704) 293-801118285MTATHL06.19.19DRY PRODRY PRO
RENOVATION FOR:
130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE
BELMONT, NC

“”1120 GREENWOOD CLIFFCHARLOTTE, NC 28204Cell: 704.305.2770DRY PROFOR CONSTRUCTIONOF: 5PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYISSUE DATEDATEREVISION18285SBGEMS6/21/19DRY PRO
RENOVATION FOR:
130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE
BELMONT, NCSCHEDULES ANDNOTESE1
JANITORCLOSETSHOWER ROOMEX. CEILING AT +/-13'-5"TV MONITOR28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"DUMPSTERDUMPSTER161'-0"10'-0"40'-0"40'-0"EXISTING RAMPTO REMAININSTALL 40'-0" CONCRETE PADAT DOCK HEIGHT AND 40'-0"RAMP WITH 10" CURB.INDICATES EXTERIOR FLOOD LIGHT LOCATIONS-VERIFY FINAL LOCATIONS AND LIGHT SPEC WITH TENANT.RECEPTION100CONFERENCE RM104STOR101HALLWAY102HALLWAY103OFFICE105OPEN OFFICE106MTG RM107MTG RM108STORAGE109OFFICE110OFFICE111OFFICE116OFFICE117OPEN OFFICE112OFFICE113OFFICE114OFFICE115EXECUTIVE OFFICE118OPEN OFFICE119OFFICE120OFFICE121OFFICE122UNIFORM ROOM123MENSLOCKER RM124MENSTOILET RM125JANITOR 126MENS127WOMENS128IT ROOM129HALLWAY130BREAK ROOM131TRAINING ROOM132MEN133WOMEN134WOMEN135MEN136WAREHOUSE137ALL NEW DROPPED CEILING,NEW TILE, GRID AND LIGHTS.OPEN TO DECKOPEN TO DECKOPEN TO DECKOPEN TO DECKTIE INTO EXISTING GYP CEILING.HEADER TO DECKEXISTING CEILING GRID TO REMAIN.REPLACE WITH NEW CEILING TILES.REPLACE WITH ALL NEW LED LIGHTSEXISTING CEILINGTILE TO REMAIN.EXISTING CEILINGTILE TO REMAIN.14'-5" TO DECK11'-6" TO BEAMSGREEN ROOM1387'-2"SOFFITABOVE MILLWORKTV MONITORADD EXTRA INSULATIONABOVE CEILING FOR SOUND.66'-0"EXISTING 2 HOURRATED WALLNEW FIRESHUTTER DOOREXISTING FIRESHUTTER DOORNEW FIRESHUTTER DOORNEW 1 HOURRATED WALLEXISTING SHELL WALLEXISTING SHELL WALLEXISTING SHELL WALLEXISTINGSHELL WALLHUFCOR PANEL PARTITION ANDTRACK VERIFY FINAL SPEC FOR LAYOUT.HUFCOR PANEL PARTITIONAND TRACK VERIFYFINAL SPEC FOR LAYOUT.2A1.65'-91
4"“”1120 GREENWOOD CLIFFCHARLOTTE, NC 28204Cell: 704.305.2770DRY PROFOR CONSTRUCTIONOF: 5PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYISSUE DATEDATEREVISION18285SBGEMS6/21/19DRY PRO
RENOVATION FOR:
130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE
BELMONT, NCLIGHTING PLANE2
TV MONITOR28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"TVREQUIRED FLOOR BOXESFURNITURE SYSTEM TBDFURNITURE SYSTEM TBDF FLOOR BOXACDUMPSTERDUMPSTERAVAV161'-0"10'-0"40'-0"40'-0"EXISTING RAMPTO REMAININSTALL 40'-0" CONCRETE PADAT DOCK HEIGHT AND 40'-0"RAMP WITH 10" CURB.INDICATES EXTERIOR FLOOD LIGHT LOCATIONS-VERIFY FINAL LOCATIONS AND LIGHT SPEC WITH TENANT.RECEPTION100CONFERENCE RM104STOR101HALLWAY102HALLWAY103OFFICE105OPEN OFFICE106MTG RM107MTG RM108STORAGE109OFFICE110OFFICE111OFFICE116OFFICE117OPEN OFFICE112OFFICE113OFFICE114OFFICE115EXECUTIVE OFFICE118OPEN OFFICE119OFFICE120OFFICE121OFFICE122UNIFORM ROOM123MENSLOCKER RM124MENSTOILET RM125JANITOR 126MENS127WOMENS128IT ROOM129HALLWAY130BREAK ROOM131TRAINING ROOM132MEN133WOMEN134WOMEN135MEN136WAREHOUSE137GREEN ROOM138TV MONITOR ON SWIVEL MOUNT.HEIGHT TBDFFFFFFFFFFFF FLOOR BOXVERIFY FINAL LOCATIONS FLOOR BOXVERIFY FINAL LOCATIONSFFFFTV MONITORTV (POLE MOUNTED FROM CEILING(POWER AND DATA)TVTVTV MONITORTV MONITORTV MONITORTV MONITORTVPOWER, DATA ANDAV CHASE IN FLOOR BOX66'-0"EXISTING 2 HOURRATED WALLNEW FIRESHUTTER DOOREXISTING FIRESHUTTER DOORNEW FIRESHUTTER DOORNEW 1 HOURRATED WALLEXISTING SHELL WALLEXISTING SHELL WALLEXISTING SHELL WALLEXISTINGSHELL WALL1120 GREENWOOD CLIFFCHARLOTTE, NC 28204Cell: 704.305.2770DRY PROFOR CONSTRUCTIONOF: 5PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYISSUE DATEDATEREVISION18285SBGEMS6/21/19DRY PRO
RENOVATION FOR:
130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE
BELMONT, NCPOWER PLANE3
TV MONITOR28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"28"RECEPTION100CONFERENCE RM104STOR101HALLWAY102HALLWAY103OFFICE105OPEN OFFICE106MTG RM107MTG RM108STORAGE109OFFICE110OFFICE111OFFICE116OFFICE117OPEN OFFICE112OFFICE113OFFICE114OFFICE115EXECUTIVE OFFICE118OPEN OFFICE119OFFICE120OFFICE121OFFICE122UNIFORM ROOM123MENSLOCKER RM124MENSTOILET RM125JANITOR 126MENS127WOMENS128IT ROOM129HALLWAY130BREAK ROOM131TRAINING ROOM132MEN133WOMEN134WOMEN135MEN136WAREHOUSE137GREEN ROOM138TV MONITOR1120 GREENWOOD CLIFFCHARLOTTE, NC 28204Cell: 704.305.2770DRY PROFOR CONSTRUCTIONOF: 5PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYISSUE DATEDATEREVISION18285SBGEMS6/21/19DRY PRO
RENOVATION FOR:
130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE
BELMONT, NCMECHANICALCONNECTIONSE4
“”1120 GREENWOOD CLIFFCHARLOTTE, NC 28204Cell: 704.305.2770DRY PROFOR CONSTRUCTIONOF: 5PROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYISSUE DATEDATEREVISION18285SBGEMS6/21/19DRY PRO
RENOVATION FOR:
130 PERFORMANCE DRIVE
BELMONT, NCRISERS ANDNOTESE5