23037_Environmental Management Plan _ Elan Indian Trail_03.09.2020

March 6, 2020

Mr. Cody J. Cannon, Project Manager
Brownfields Section-Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
217 West Jones Street
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646

Re: Environmental Management Plan (revised)
Elan Indian Trail
SE Intersection of Chestnut Pkwy & Hwy 74
Indian Trail, North Carolina
Brownfields Project Number #23037-19-090

Dear Mr. Cannon:

On behalf of Greystar GP II LLC, Resolve Environmental PLLC presents the attached final draft of the Environmental
Management Plan (EMP) for the proposed development of the properties located at the southeast intersection of
Chestnut Parkway and Highway 74 in Indian Trail, Union County, North Carolina. In addition to the EMP, the
following sheets, figures and tables are included with the EMP and are listed below.

Resolve Environmental Services, PLLC Figures:
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Soil Quality Map (based on Land Design Inc. 2.0)
Figure 3: Ground Water Quality Map (based on Land Design Inc. 2.0)

Resolve Environmental Services, PLLC Tables:
Table 1: Summary of Laboratory Analyses- Soil Samples
Table 3: Summary of Laboratory Analyses- Ground and Surface Water Samples

Appendices: Civil Engineering and Architectural Sheets (Land Design Inc.):
Sheet SD-1.0: Cover Sheet
Sheet SD-1.1: Survey
Sheet SD-2.0: Layout Plan
Sheet SD-2.1: Site Details
Sheet SD-3.0: Grading Plan
Sheet SD-4.0: Storm Drainage Plan
Sheet SD-5.0: Sanitary Sewer Plan
Sheet SD-6.0: Water Plan
Architectural Site Plan
Cut and Fill Analysis

Please do not hesitate to call with any further questions and/or comments during your review.

Sincerely,
Resolve Environmental Services, PLLC

Terry D. Kennedy, P.G.

enclosures

1
EMP Version 2, June 2018
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.

The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory-compliant
decision-making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.

Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development-related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project,
and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be
cause for a reopener

So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.

☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.

☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.

2
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:

☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.

☒ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.

☒ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.

☐ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
on site after construction grading.

☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).

☐ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.

☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☒ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.

☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.

☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.

☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.

☐ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.

☐ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.

3
EMP Version 2, June 2018
GENERAL INFORMATION

Date: 3/2/2020 Revision Date (if applicable): Click or tap to enter a date.

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Elan Indian Trail

Brownfields Project Number: 23037-19-090

Brownfields Property Address: US Highway 74 East and Chestnut Parkway, Indian Trail, North Carolina

Brownfields Property Area (acres): 31.68
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.

COMMUNICATIONS

A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.

Prospective Developer (PD): Greystar GP II, LLC
Contact Person: Josh Glover
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-379-1868 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Contractor for PD: Greystar Development and Construction, LP
Contact Person: Tony Grohman
Phone Numbers: Office: 843-576-5743 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Environmental Consultant: Resolve Environmental Services, PLLC
Contact Person: Terry D. Kennedy, P.G.
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-289-5881 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Brownfields Program Project Manager: Cody Cannon
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-235-2168 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,

4
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
Click or tap here to enter text.

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:

On‐site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior ☒

Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior ☒

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours ☒

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours ☒

Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior ☒

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days ☒

REDEVELOPMENT PLANS

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☒Residential ☐Recreational ☐Institutional ☒Commercial ☐Office ☐Retail ☐Industrial
☐Other specify:
The property will be developed as “The Hub” which is planned as a multi-use development
including two apartment complexes and potentially a planned hotel.

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth‐moving activities
at the site:
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
☒ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
☒ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors

3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:

5
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Phase 1 is planned to consist of 350 Class-A, affordable/workforce housing rental multifamily
units, with associated parking, leasing, and amenity facilities. The apartments are planned to be
housed in 9 apartment buildings. Phase I will also include the construction of a community
clubhouse and pool. Square footages of the proposed 9 structures are as follows (refer to
Architectural Site Plan included in Appendix A): Building #1 (clubhouse): 6,906, Building #2:
35,019, Building #3: 37,915, Building #4: 26,939, Building #5: 26,939, Building #6: 37,915,
Building #7: 28,147, Building #8 (fire wall included): 136,797, Building #9: 28,147 and Building
#10: 35,109.

Phase II remains in initial planning, but is planned to consist of +/- 250 Class-A
affordable/workforce housing rental multifamily units, with separate associated parking, leasing,
and amenity facilities. An amended EMP will be submitted to NCDEQ for Phase II activities.

Demolition of the two existing buildings will be conducted prior to the initiation of Phase II.

Major utility improvements including water and sewer will be necessary during the
implementation of Phase I.

Cutting and filling will be necessary to bring the site to construction grade. An estimated 502,634
ft2 of the property will be regraded according to the cut and fill analysis. An estimated 24,415
yd3 of cutting and 1975 yd3 of fill will be required to will be required bring the property to
proper construction grade.

Relevant A/E Plans completed to date for Phase I are included in Appendix A.

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.

5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.

6) Which category of risk‐based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
☒ Residential ☐ Non‐Residential or Industrial/Commercial

6
EMP Version 2, June 2018
7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 5/1/2020

b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
Site construction currently is slated to commence 1 May 2020.

Following receipt of necessary permits, the Phase I portion of the site will be regraded
according to the grading plan. Perimeter lighting installation and curbing would also be
completed.

Subsequently, the apartment buildings will be framed, and the roofing, HVAC, electrical,
plumbing, interior and exterior walls will be installed. This phase is anticipated to be 12
months in duration.

Paving and landscaping will be the final stage of the project. These activities are estimated to
take 30 days to complete.

More detailed timelines for the phases and phase durations will be determined by the
awarded contractor.

c) Additional phases planned? ☐ Yes ☐ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: 5/1/2022
Planned Activity:
Phase II remains in initial planning, but is planned to consist of +/- 250 Class-A rental
multifamily units, with separate associated parking, leasing, and amenity facilities.

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:

d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 5/1/2022

CONTAMINATED MEDIA

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil:……………………………………….……………. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected

7
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Part 2. Groundwater:.……………………….……..……. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water:.……………...……..…………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment:.……………...……..…………………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor:…..…………...……..…………………. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 6. Sub‐Slab Soil Vapor:……...……..…………….. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air:...……..…………………………………. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.

PART 1. Soil – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.

1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
Arsenic was detected at concentrations exceeding residential PSRGs in soil and/or streambed
sediment samples at the site. However, these metals concentrations are interpreted to be
naturally occurring.

Detectable and or estimated concentrations of petroleum VOC compounds MTBE, cis-1,2-
Dichloroethylene, Di-Isopropyl Ether and SVOC compounds 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine and bis(2-
Ethylhexyl)phthalate were reported in ground water samples collected at the site, but below NC
2L Standards.

Detectable or estimated concentrations of arsenic, barium, total chromium and/or lead were
reported in collected surface water samples at the site. The metals concentrations are
interpreted as background levels.

2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
0-2

3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
502,634

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
0.25-3.75

5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
24,415

6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
It can be anticipated that much of the excavated soil will exceed the residential standards for
metals (arsenic) based on background conditions due to the parent rock and weathered soil

8
EMP Version 2, June 2018
underlying the site. These metals are interpreted to be naturally occurring and will be regraded
into the site contours.

7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
N/A

Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31‐261.35?....................................... ☐Yes ☒No
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained‐Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained‐In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes ☐ No

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED‐OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED‐IN POLICY THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes ☒ No
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
☐ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
Click or tap here to enter text.

9
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☐ If no, explain rationale:
Characteristic waste was not identified during the assessment activities
completed to date at the site.

d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
☒ Preliminary Health‐Based Residential SRGs
☐ Preliminary Health‐Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
☐ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
☐ Site‐specific risk‐based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Although not anticipated, any soils suspected to be contaminated that are encountered
during excavation will be segregated, stockpiled in accordance with applicable NCDEQ
guidelines and screened with an OVA.

Additional comments:
Click or tap here to enter text.

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known
☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☐
☐ Describe cap or fill:
Concrete /asphalt

☐ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re‐recorded if
actions are Post‐Recordation).
☒ GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
☐ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:
Click or tap here to enter text.

10
EMP Version 2, June 2018

4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
☒ Yes, describe the method will include:
If necessary, to control contaminated soils, BMPs, including spraying soils with water to
minimize visible dust, will be followed during management of soils. The excavation
contractor will excavate and grade during appropriate weather conditions to minimize
fugitive dust.

☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Field Screening of site soil
☐ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
Any soils exhibiting odors, staining or other characteristics of contamination is
encountered at the site, the environmental professional (Resolve) will immediately be
notified. Based on site observations, Resolve will (if necessary), screen soils with a PID
and/or collect an appropriate number of samples for the analytical methods detailed
below. The affected soils will be stockpiled.

☒ No, explain rationale:
Field screening for natural occurring metals is not feasible.

Soil Sample Collection
☒ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in‐situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
Any soils exhibiting odors, staining or other characteristics of contamination will be
stockpiled and sampled using the analytical methods detailed below. One composite
sample (comprised of 4-5 grab samples) per 1,000 cubic yards of soil for SVOCs (8270) and
RCRA Metals (6020). One grab sample (based on observed impacts/screenings) submitted
for VOCs (8260).

☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.

If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

11
EMP Version 2, June 2018

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:

☒ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Click or tap here to enter text.

Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, a work plan for
final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
Final grade sampling will be carried out in accordance with a DEQ-approved plan (to be
submitted at a later date) prior to occupancy of onsite structures.

Click or tap here to enter text.

12
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☐ If final grade sampling was NOT selected please explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Part 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL

NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner.”

Requirements for importing fill:

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown

2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
Limited amount of fill may be required to prepare land and reach grade level during building
construction. The amount of fill necessary will be determined based upon the suitability of the
site soils for building construction. The volume of imported soil is currently unknown. Once the
final grading plan is completed the volume of fill can be estimated.

3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range
of depths, please list the range.)
Approximately 2-6 feet

4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
Based upon the local barrow pits and quarries in the vicinity of the site, crushed stone imported
for fill will likely originate from the Martin Marietta Bakers Quarry in Monroe, NC. Imported soil
will likely be acquired from the permitted JB Pressler borrow pit in Monroe, NC. However, the
imported soil will be determined by the GC. A sampling plan for the imported fill facilities will be
provided for DEQ approval prior to import activities.

5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use at the Brownfields property.
If imported soil will be used, soil will be sampled and analyzed for the methods specified below.
Samples will be collected from borrow material and collected with a hand auger. The analytical
results will be provided to the Brownfields Project Manager for approval prior to importation of
soil to demonstrate it meets acceptable standards for imported fill. The awarded contractor will
determine the fill source for fill and stone. Once the specific source(s) of fill are known, a
sampling plan will be submitted for NCDEQ review and approval.

13
EMP Version 2, June 2018

6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 6020

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Click or tap here to enter text.

7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in-situ
borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought
onto the Brownfields Property.
If soil is obtained from an offsite property that is not a known permitted quarry, a sampling plan
will be developed and submitted for DEQ review. The plan will consist of collecting one sample
(per quarry) for VOCs, SVOCs and metals. DEQ approval of the sampling plan and analytical
results will be obtained prior to transporting import soil the property. However, if the borrow
source has not be previously developed (virgin land) soil samples will be collected for the
laboratory analysis indicated above at a general rate of 1 per 500 to 1000 cu yds. If the borrow
source property has been previous developed, the soil samples will be collected for laboratory
analysis indicated above at a general rate or 1 per 400 cu yds.

Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.

1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.

14
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Export of soil has not been determined at this time. It is anticipated that any cut material will be
reincorporated into the planned final grade at the site and capped if necessary, to the greatest
extent possible. However, any soil deemed necessary to export will be stockpiled on site in roll-
off containers or on plastic, bermed and covered in plastic (see Figure 1). Stockpile soil grab-type
samples will be collected from the stockpiled soil and analyzed as detailed below for waste
characterization and prior to disposal option determination. The soil sampling data will be
forwarded to the Brownfields Program manager and the most cost-effective and appropriate
disposal options will be presented to the Brownfields Program manager for review and approval.
It is anticipated that any export soil will either be transported to another, as yet undetermined,
Brownfields facility or to a permitted waste facility based upon the waste characterization.

2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
☒ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
☒ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting Landfill;
☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility
☒ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property – determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and that a record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
☒ Use as Beneficial Fill off-site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.

3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).
Click or tap here to enter text.

Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES

☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)

☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original
depth from which it was excavated.

15
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ If no, include rationale here:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Click or tap here to enter text.

PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below.

1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
11-16 feet BGS

2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☒onsite ☐offsite ☐both or ☐unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
Groundwater at the site has been affected by VOCs and SVOCs from an offsite source. The
contaminated ground water does not exceed the MCLs or NCDEQ’s T15 ANCAC 2L .0202
Standards.

3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
Northwest to southeast

4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
☐Yes ☒No
If yes, describe these activities:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered
during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent
management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or
sampling procedures).
Allow ground water to re-infiltrate for approximately 24 hours before dewatering from
excavations and foundations. Containerize the ground water, collect sample(s) and analyze for
VOCs using EPA Method 8260 for use in developing a profile for proper offsite disposal.

5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☒Yes ☐No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes ☒No

6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.

16
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☒ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program’s intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
☒ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
☐ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
☐ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.

7) Please provide additional details as needed:

Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.

PART 3. SURFACE WATER -Please fill out the information below.
1) Is surface water present at the property? ☒ Yes ☐ No
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes ☒ No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run‐off, stormwater impacts):
In the unlikely event that impacted surface water is encountered, the PD will prevent rainwater
runoff from entering the disturbed areas by setting up barriers to divert flow from disturbed
soils. Containerize any surface water that comes in contact with disturbed soils. Collect
sample(s) of containerized surface water and analyze for VOCs using EPA Method 8260 for use in
developing a profile for proper offsite disposal.

PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below.

1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ☒ Yes ☐ No

2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No
Click or tap here to enter text.

17
EMP Version 2, June 2018

3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No

4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.

5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
BMP for sedimentation and erosion control will be used to prevent runoff from entering the
stream. Wetlands will be properly marked to prevent the crossing of the stream bed by vehicular
traffic. Any streambed disturbance will be stockpiled and sampled for waste characterization,
prior to determination of disposal requirements.

PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below.

1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
Groundwater:.….☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
Groundwater:…..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?

4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities
(trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management
of such contact:
If suspected contaminated soil vapor is encountered during site work, soil vapor will be
monitored with an OVA during excavation activities. If contaminated soil vapors are
encountered, NCDEQ will be notified. The area will be evacuated and appropriate safety
screening of vapors will be performed. If results indicate further action is warranted,
appropriate engineering controls, such as use of a fan and/or personal protective equipment will
be implemented. In addition, the potential need for building vapor mitigation will be considered
at that time.

Unknown

18
EMP Version 2, June 2018

PART 6. SUB‐SLAB SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.
1) Are sub‐slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) If data indicate that sub‐slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map
showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub‐slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☐0‐6 inches ☐Other, please
describe:
Unknown

4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub‐slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
In the unlikely event that contaminated vapor is encountered during site development, the
contractor will remove personnel from the area of contaminated soil vapor and allow the vapors
to disperse, as determined by PID monitoring.

PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below.

1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk‐based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:

VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM – Please fill out the information below.
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☐ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
Click or tap here to enter text.
The two existing buildings are elevated above the ground and will be demolished.

19
EMP Version 2, June 2018

VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer

If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
No detectable concentrations exceeding the NCDEQ’s vapor intrusion screening levels were
reported in collected ground water samples during assessment activities at the site.

CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials

In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site-specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Click or tap here to enter text.

Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
Encountering items or issues of environmental concern during the development of the site will be
reported to the NCDEQ Brownfields Project Manager.

20
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Underground Storage Tanks:
Should a previously unreported underground storage tank (UST) be identified during site development
activities, excavation activities in the vicinity of the UST will be put on hold and the discovery will be
reported to the environmental consultant, who will assess the situation and report to the DEQ within
48 hours of discovery. The tank will be inspected to determine if any product remains in the tank. The
contents of the tank will be evaluated, analyzed, and disposed of at a licensed offsite facility in
accordance with regulatory requirements and DEQ approval. The tank will be removed and soil
sampled in consultation with DEQ.

Sub-Grade Feature/Pit:
If a subsurface feature, pit or impoundment be discovered during site development, excavation and
activities in the vicinity of the feature will be placed on hold and the discovery will be reported to
the environmental consultant. The consultant will assess the situation and report to the DEQ within
48 hours of discovery. Any contents of the feature will be evaluated, analyzed, and disposed of at a
licensed offsite facility in accordance with regulatory requirements and DEQ approval. The
subsurface feature will be removed and sampled in consultation with DEQ.

Buried Waste Material:
Should buried waste material be discovered during excavation activities, the contractor will
immediately notify the environmental consultant. The consultant will assess the situation and
report to the DEQ within 48 hours of discovery. The contents of the waste material will be sampled
and removed in consultation with DEQ.

Re-Use of Impacted Soils On-Site:
Coordinate with the NCDEQ regarding reuse and sample the material using the methods specified at
the beginning of this section.

If unknown, impacted soil is identified on-site, management on-site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on-site.

If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
The environmental consultant will be notified in the event that other indications of potential
environmental concern or impact are identified at the site and report discoveries to DEQ within 48-
hours.

POST‐REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING

☒ Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the

21
EMP Version 2, June 2018
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 1/31/2021

The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment-related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).

☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement.

23
EMP Version 2, June 2018

FIGURES
SITE LOCATIONFigure 1 Site Location Elan-Indian Trail SE Intersection of Chestnut Pkwy & Hwy 74Indian Trail, Union County, NCBrownfields Project ID No. 23037-19-090Project No. 5225500 M2000 FTDate: 11/21/19Location: 35.084471° N 80.664309° W Dad
N
E
L
S
O
N

L
E
M
M
O
N
D

D
R
4
L
E
V
E
L
S 105+00EA
S
T

I
N
D
E
P
E
N
D
E
N
C
E

B
L
V
D
CHE
S
T
N
U
T
P
K
W
Y
25.00'25.
0
0
'
R9.50'
7.
0
0
'9.75'2
4
.
0
0
'
1
8
.
0
0
'9.00'PROPERTY
BOUNDARY (TYP.)
STREAM
(TYP.)
COMMON
OPEN SPACE (TYP.)
MULT-FAMILY BUILDING (TYP.)
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY (TYP.)
(87)60 DEGREE PARKING SPACES
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
(TYP.)
PHA
SE LI
N
E
100 YEAR
FLOOD PLAIN
(TYP.)
WETLAND
(TYP.)TRASH ENCLOSURE (TYP.)
ENTRY GATE
(TYP.)
ENTRY GATE
(TYP.)
ENTRY GATE
(TYP.)
PHASE 2
HEAVY DUTY
ASPHALT(TYP.)
POOL DECK PAVING (TYP.)
7' CONCRETE
SW (TYP.)
P.A.
WETLAND
(TYP.)
POOL
STREAM
BUFFER (TYP.)
MONUMENT
SIGNAGE
EXISTING SS
EASEMENT
(TYP)
CLUBHOUSE
ADA
SPACES (TYP.)
ENTRY GATE
(TYP.)
LIGHT DUTY
ASPHALT(TYP.)
10' CONCRETE
SW (TYP.)
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
CONCRETE
SIDEWALK (TYP.)
P.A.
P.A.
HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE (TYP.)
1'-6" CURB
& GUTTER (TYP.)
BUILDING
6
BUILDING
7
BUILDING
8
BUILDING
9
BUILDING
5
BUILDING
4
BUILDING
1
BUILDING
2
BUILDING
3
18.00'36.00'24.00'18.00'24.00'P.A.
THE HUB AT
INDIAN TRAIL
GREYSTAR GP II, LLC
US 74 & CHESTNUT PARKWAY
INDIAN TRAIL. NC
1019204
LAYOUT PLAN
LDI
JEM
MEK
SD-2.0
8/16/2019 3:10 PM MARK TAYLOR N:\_2019\1019204\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\SD\19204_PLN_LAYOUT SD.DWG
0
1"=60'
30'60'120'
KEY MAP
SEAL
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE
PROJECT
NORTH
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
HORZ:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704.333.0325
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE # C-0658
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SEAL
VERT:
LEGEND
COMMON OPEN SPACE
±86,417 SF (1.98 ACRES)
15.94%
PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL UNITS:350 UNITS
REQUIRED: DWELLINGS, MULTI-FAMILY
1.5 SPACES/UNIT
350 UNITS = 525 SPACES
PROVIDED: 525 SPACES ON-SITE
INCLUDING 20 ADA SPACES
MUNICIPAL INFORMATION & ZONING
TOTAL SITE ACREAGE: +/-28.284 AC.
MUNICIPALITY: TOWN OF INDIAN TRAIL, NC
ZONING:MXD (CD)
MINIMUM SETBACKS
EAST INDEPENDENCE BLVD:0 FT
N INDIAN TRAIL RD:0 FT
NELSON LEMMOND DR 0 FT
CHESTNUT PKWY:0 FT
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT:70 FEET
INDIAN TRAIL UDO TREE MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
NON-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE REPLANTING PLAN
SHALL BE AT 25% RATIO:
EXISTING CALIPER INCH = X
CALCULATION = X" CALIPER TREE X 25% = X" CALIPER
REPLACEMENT TREE OR TREES EQUIVALENT TO THAT
CUMULATIVE CALIPER.
MIN. REPLACEMENT TREE CALIPER: 2.5"
TREE SURVEY
A BASIC MEASURE OF STAND DENSITY FROM FIXED PLOTS
WAS USED TO DETERMINE THE NUMBER HERITAGE TREES
PER UNIT AREA, IN THIS CASE HERITAGE TREES PER ACRE
(HTPA). THE ONLY TREES INCLUDED IN THE CALCULATION ARE
TREES THAT ARE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 14INCHES DBH
FOR DECIDUOUS TREES AND 18 INCHES DBH FRO EVERGREEN
TREES.
DETERMINING HTPA FROM FIXED PLOTS:
1.DETERMINE THE EXPANSION FACTOR (THE NUMBER OF
TREES PER ACRE A GIVEN PLOT TREE REPRESENTS) BY
TAKING THE DENOMINATOR OF THE PLOT SIZE (1/10TH
ACRE) AND DIVIDING BY THE NUMBER OF PLOTS.
2.ADD UP THE TOTAL NUMBER OF HERITAGE TREES FOR
ALL THE PLOTS IN THE STAND.
3.MULTIPLY THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PLOT HERITAGE
TREES BY THE EXPANSION FACTOR TO DETERMINE THE
TOTAL HTPA FOR THE STAND.

LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT
+/-81,883 SF
HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT
+/-185,332 SF
HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE
+/-273 SF
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
+/-30,555 SF
POOL DECK PAVING
+/-5,394 SF
PLANTING AREA P.A.
LANDSCAPING/SCREENING
PARKING AREA TREE REQUIREMENTS: 1 LARGE OR 2 SMALL TREES
SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH 12 PARKING SPACES.
TOTAL SPACES: 525/12 = 44 TREES REQUIRED.
EACH SPACE SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 65' OF TREE
PARKING AREAS SHALL BE SCREENED FROM ADJACENT PUBLIC
ROADS WITH SHRUBS BASED ON THE MUNICIPALITY'S SPECIES LIST.
STORM BASIN DETENTIONS SHALL BE SCREENED WITH FENCING
AND OR SHRUBS AS DETERMINED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR AND
SHALL BE DEPENDANT UPON THE SIZE, LOCATION, AND USE OF THE
BASIN.
PLOT #COMMUNITY TYPE/#HERITAGE TREES PER PLOT
DESCRIPTION 14" DECIDUOUS 18" EVERGREEN
1 LOBLOLLY PINE DOMINATED 0
SUCCESSIONAL WOODS
2 MIXED HARDWOOD 4
DOMINATED PIEDMONT
BOTTOMLAND FOREST
3 LOBLOLLY PINE DOMINATED 0
SUCCESSIONAL FOREST
4 LOBLOLLY PINE DOMINATED 0
SUCCESSIONAL FOREST
5 LOBLOLLY PINE DOMINATED 0
SUCCESSIONAL FOREST
6 WHITE OAK DOMINATED 2
MESIC MIXED HARDWOOD
FOREST
7 LOBLOLLY PINE DOMINATED 0
SUCCESSIONAL FOREST
TOTAL #6
HERITAGE TREES
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
EXPANSION FACTOR = PLOT SIZE DENOMINATOR/PLOTS: 10/7 = 1.42
HTPA = #HERITAGE TREES X EXPANSION FACTOR
HTPA = 6 X 1.42 = 8.52 TREES
N
E
L
S
O
N

L
E
M
M
O
N
D

D
R
4
L
E
V
E
L
S 105+00EA
S
T

I
N
D
E
P
E
N
D
E
N
C
E

B
L
V
D
CHE
S
T
N
U
T
P
K
W
Y
25.00'25.
0
0
'
R9.50'
7.
0
0
'9.75'2
4
.
0
0
'
1
8
.
0
0
'9.00'PROPERTY
BOUNDARY (TYP.)
STREAM
(TYP.)
COMMON
OPEN SPACE (TYP.)
MULT-FAMILY BUILDING (TYP.)
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY (TYP.)
(87)60 DEGREE PARKING SPACES
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
(TYP.)
PHA
SE LI
N
E
100 YEAR
FLOOD PLAIN
(TYP.)
WETLAND
(TYP.)TRASH ENCLOSURE (TYP.)
ENTRY GATE
(TYP.)
ENTRY GATE
(TYP.)
ENTRY GATE
(TYP.)
PHASE 2
HEAVY DUTY
ASPHALT(TYP.)
POOL DECK PAVING (TYP.)
7' CONCRETE
SW (TYP.)
P.A.
WETLAND
(TYP.)
POOL
STREAM
BUFFER (TYP.)
MONUMENT
SIGNAGE
EXISTING SS
EASEMENT
(TYP)
CLUBHOUSE
ADA
SPACES (TYP.)
ENTRY GATE
(TYP.)
LIGHT DUTY
ASPHALT(TYP.)
10' CONCRETE
SW (TYP.)
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
CONCRETE
SIDEWALK (TYP.)
P.A.
P.A.
HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE (TYP.)
1'-6" CURB
& GUTTER (TYP.)
BUILDING
6
BUILDING
7
BUILDING
8
BUILDING
9
BUILDING
5
BUILDING
4
BUILDING
1
BUILDING
2
BUILDING
3
18.00'36.00'24.00'18.00'24.00'P.A.
THE HUB AT
INDIAN TRAIL
GREYSTAR GP II, LLC
US 74 & CHESTNUT PARKWAY
INDIAN TRAIL. NC
1019204
LAYOUT PLAN
LDI
JEM
MEK
SD-2.0
8/16/2019 3:10 PM MARK TAYLOR N:\_2019\1019204\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\SD\19204_PLN_LAYOUT SD.DWG
0
1"=60'
30'60'120'
KEY MAP
SEAL
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE
PROJECT
NORTH
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
HORZ:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704.333.0325
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE # C-0658
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SEAL
VERT:
LEGEND
COMMON OPEN SPACE
±86,417 SF (1.98 ACRES)
15.94%
PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL UNITS:350 UNITS
REQUIRED: DWELLINGS, MULTI-FAMILY
1.5 SPACES/UNIT
350 UNITS = 525 SPACES
PROVIDED: 525 SPACES ON-SITE
INCLUDING 20 ADA SPACES
MUNICIPAL INFORMATION & ZONING
TOTAL SITE ACREAGE: +/-28.284 AC.
MUNICIPALITY: TOWN OF INDIAN TRAIL, NC
ZONING:MXD (CD)
MINIMUM SETBACKS
EAST INDEPENDENCE BLVD:0 FT
N INDIAN TRAIL RD:0 FT
NELSON LEMMOND DR 0 FT
CHESTNUT PKWY:0 FT
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT:70 FEET
INDIAN TRAIL UDO TREE MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
NON-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE REPLANTING PLAN
SHALL BE AT 25% RATIO:
EXISTING CALIPER INCH = X
CALCULATION = X" CALIPER TREE X 25% = X" CALIPER
REPLACEMENT TREE OR TREES EQUIVALENT TO THAT
CUMULATIVE CALIPER.
MIN. REPLACEMENT TREE CALIPER: 2.5"
TREE SURVEY
A BASIC MEASURE OF STAND DENSITY FROM FIXED PLOTS
WAS USED TO DETERMINE THE NUMBER HERITAGE TREES
PER UNIT AREA, IN THIS CASE HERITAGE TREES PER ACRE
(HTPA). THE ONLY TREES INCLUDED IN THE CALCULATION ARE
TREES THAT ARE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 14INCHES DBH
FOR DECIDUOUS TREES AND 18 INCHES DBH FRO EVERGREEN
TREES.
DETERMINING HTPA FROM FIXED PLOTS:
1.DETERMINE THE EXPANSION FACTOR (THE NUMBER OF
TREES PER ACRE A GIVEN PLOT TREE REPRESENTS) BY
TAKING THE DENOMINATOR OF THE PLOT SIZE (1/10TH
ACRE) AND DIVIDING BY THE NUMBER OF PLOTS.
2.ADD UP THE TOTAL NUMBER OF HERITAGE TREES FOR
ALL THE PLOTS IN THE STAND.
3.MULTIPLY THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PLOT HERITAGE
TREES BY THE EXPANSION FACTOR TO DETERMINE THE
TOTAL HTPA FOR THE STAND.

LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT
+/-81,883 SF
HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT
+/-185,332 SF
HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE
+/-273 SF
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
+/-30,555 SF
POOL DECK PAVING
+/-5,394 SF
PLANTING AREA P.A.
LANDSCAPING/SCREENING
PARKING AREA TREE REQUIREMENTS: 1 LARGE OR 2 SMALL TREES
SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH 12 PARKING SPACES.
TOTAL SPACES: 525/12 = 44 TREES REQUIRED.
EACH SPACE SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 65' OF TREE
PARKING AREAS SHALL BE SCREENED FROM ADJACENT PUBLIC
ROADS WITH SHRUBS BASED ON THE MUNICIPALITY'S SPECIES LIST.
STORM BASIN DETENTIONS SHALL BE SCREENED WITH FENCING
AND OR SHRUBS AS DETERMINED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR AND
SHALL BE DEPENDANT UPON THE SIZE, LOCATION, AND USE OF THE
BASIN.
PLOT #COMMUNITY TYPE/#HERITAGE TREES PER PLOT
DESCRIPTION 14" DECIDUOUS 18" EVERGREEN
1 LOBLOLLY PINE DOMINATED 0
SUCCESSIONAL WOODS
2 MIXED HARDWOOD 4
DOMINATED PIEDMONT
BOTTOMLAND FOREST
3 LOBLOLLY PINE DOMINATED 0
SUCCESSIONAL FOREST
4 LOBLOLLY PINE DOMINATED 0
SUCCESSIONAL FOREST
5 LOBLOLLY PINE DOMINATED 0
SUCCESSIONAL FOREST
6 WHITE OAK DOMINATED 2
MESIC MIXED HARDWOOD
FOREST
7 LOBLOLLY PINE DOMINATED 0
SUCCESSIONAL FOREST
TOTAL #6
HERITAGE TREES
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
EXPANSION FACTOR = PLOT SIZE DENOMINATOR/PLOTS: 10/7 = 1.42
HTPA = #HERITAGE TREES X EXPANSION FACTOR
HTPA = 6 X 1.42 = 8.52 TREES

TABLES
Soil DUP A Soil DUP B SED-EFF SED-INF
Date Sampled 10/5/2019 10/5/2019 10/5/2019 10/5/2019 10/5/2019 10/5/2019 10/5/2019 10/5/2019 10/5/2019 10/5/2019 10/5/2019 10/5/2019 10/5/2019 10/5/2019 10/5/2019 10/5/2019
Acetone 0.186 J 0.667 0.161 J 0.536 0.199 J 0.376 0.414 0.157 J NR NR NR NR ND 0.269 0.230 J ND 61,000 670,000 2.9
Benzene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NR NR NR NR ND ND 0.0040 J ND 1.2 5.1 0.00023
2-Butanone (MEK)ND 0.0320 J ND ND ND ND 0.0128 J ND NR NR NR NR ND 0.0093 J 0.0268 J ND 27,000 190,000 1.2
Ethyl Alcohol ND 0.185 J ND ND ND ND 0.120 J 0.355 J NR NR NR NR ND 0.255 J 0.935 ND NE NE NE
p-Isopropyltoluene ND ND ND 0.0161 0.0058 J 0.0121 ND ND NR NR NR NR ND ND ND ND NE NE NE
Toluene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NR NR NR NR ND ND 0.0346 ND 4,900 47,000 0.69
Benzoic Acid ND ND ND ND ND 1.49 ND ND NR NR NR NR ND ND ND NR 250,000 3,300,000 15
Benzo(b)flouranthene ND 0.0341 J ND ND ND ND ND ND NR NR NR NR ND ND ND NR 1.1 21 0.3
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NR NR NR NR ND ND 0.273 J NR NE NE NE
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 0.0818 J 0.0619 J ND 0.0516 J ND ND 0.0403 J ND NR NR NR NR ND ND ND NR 39 160 1.3
Flouranthene ND 0.0528 J ND ND ND ND ND ND NR NR NR NR ND ND ND NR 24,000 30,000 89
Phenanthrene ND 0.0619 J ND ND ND ND ND ND NR NR NR NR ND ND ND NR NE NE NE
Pyrene ND 0.0528 J ND ND ND ND ND ND NR NR NR NR ND ND ND NR 1,800 23,000 13
Arsenic 18.6 10.8 2.4 7.3 4.1 3.2 1.8 20.8 3.9 6.7 2.0 2.5 2.7 1.7 ND NR 0.68 3.0 0.0015
Barium 14.9 104 25.0 36.0 57.6 11.8 35.9 12.5 42.8 51.8 33.7 33.3 26.2 27.3 24.4 NR 15,000 220,000 82
Cadmium ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NR 71 980 0.38
Chromium 15.2 37.5 8.9 32.5 39.6 31.4 14.0 14.3 26.1 26.8 9.9 10.1 10.1 8.5 8.1 NR NE NE 180,000
Lead 7.1 15.8 6.9 6.5 16.0 7.2 10.3 7.1 13.5 8.7 18.6 15.5 10.6 3.5 3.1 NR 400 800 14
Mercury 0.063 ND ND ND 0.074 ND ND 0.065 ND 0.091 ND ND ND ND ND NR 11 460 0.033
Selenium 2.0 9.6 ND ND ND 0.93 1.2 2.5 2.0 1.6 ND ND ND 1.5 1.7 NR 390 5,800 0.26
Silver ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND NR 390 5,800 0.80
Notes: .
Soil and Sediment results reported in milligrams per kilogram
Trip blank results reported in micrograms per liter.
Concentrations in bold font exceed the NC Residential Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals.
Concentrations in bold font and italics exceed the NC Industrial/Commercial Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals.
J: Estimated value
ND: Not detected.
NR: Not requested.
Summary of Laboratory Analyses-Soil Samples
Elan - Indian Trail
Indian Trail, NC
Project ID: 21037-19-090
All results reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
GC/MS Semi-volatiles (SW846 8270D)
Metals Analysis
Table 1
SB-6 (2')
NCDEQ Preliminary
Soil Remediation
Goals ResIdential
(mg/kg)
SB-1 (2')SB-2 (2')SB-5 (2')SB-9 (2')SB-10 (2')SED DUP DSample ID:SB-4 (2')SB-3 (2')
EPA Regional Screening
Levels Protection of
Groundwater
(mg/kg)
SB-7 (2')SB-8 (2')Trip Blank
NCDEQ Preliminary Soil
Remediation Goals
Industrial/Commercial
(mg/kg)
11/23/2019
MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 DW-1 DUP TRIP BLANK SW-INF SW-EFF SW-DUP C
GC/MS Volatiles 8260D unit
Acetone ug/l <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 20.4J <10 6,000 NE
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/l <0.28 0.44 J <0.28 <0.28 <0.28 <0.28 <0.28 <0.28 <0.28 70 70
Di-Isopropyl Ether ug/l <0.24 0.52J <0.24 <0.24 <0.24 <0.24 <0.24 <0.24 <0.24 70 NE
Methyl Tert Butyl Ether ug/l <0.23 3.1 <0.23 0.70J <0.23 <0.23 <0.23 <0.23 <0.23 20 NE
p-Isopropyltoluene ug/l <0.21 <0.21 <0.21 <0.21 <0.21 <0.21 <0.21 1.1 <0.21 25 NE
Toluene ug/l <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 1.7 <0.30 600 1,000
GC/MS Semi-volatiles 8270 unit
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine ug/l <0.72 <0.72 0.83J <0.72 <0.72 NR <0.72 <7.6 <0.72 NE NE
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ug/l <0.94 <0.94 <0.94 1.1J <0.94 NR <0.95 <10 <0.95 3 6
3&4-Methylphenol ug/l <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 <0.92 NR <0.93 18.0J <0.93 NE NE
Phenol ug/l <0.47 <0.47 <0.47 <0.47 <0.47 NR <0.48 7.5J <0.48 30 NE
Metals Analysis unit
Arsenic ug/l <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 NR 2.3 23.3 <2.0 10 10
Barium ug/l 31.7 12.2 15.6 10.8 14.8 NR 177 1,630 99.7 700 2,000
Cadmium ug/l <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 NR <2.0 <20 <2.0 2 5
Chromium ug/l 6.4 <2.0 4.2 2.0 4.4 NR 7.6 277 2.5 10 100
Lead ug/l <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 NR 6.2 194 <2.0 15 15
Mercury ug/l <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 NR <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 1 2
Selenium ug/l 2.1 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 NR <2.0 <20 <2.0 20 50
Silver ug/l <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 NR <2.0 <20 <2.0 20 NE
Notes:
Results reported in micrograms per liter.
J: Estimated value.
MCL: Maximum contamination level.
NE: Not established.
NR: Analysis not requested.
TABLE 3
ELAN INDIAN TRAIL
INDIAN TRAIL, NORTH CAROLINA
Sample
Date Sampled 10/14/2019 10/14/2019
PROJECT ID 23037-19-090
10/14/2019 10/14/2019 10/14/2019 10/14/2019
NC 2L
Standard EPA MCL
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS-GROUND & SURFACE WATER SAMPLES
10/5/2019 10/5/201910/5/2019
Page 3

APPENDICES

S 40°

1
4
'

1
8
.
8
"

E
N 49° 50'

0
3
.
9
"
E
N 45° 52'

0
6
.
0"

E
S 40° 1
4
'

1
8
.
8
"

E
S 88° 02' 24.9" ES 89° 06' 29.4" E
S 40° 14'

1
8
.
8
"

E
S 40° 14
'

1
8
.
8
"

E
S 88° 02' 24.9" E
S 40° 14'

1
8
.
8
"

E
CR
CR
CR
CR
CRCR
= 46°
5
7
'

3
4
.
3
"

(
R
T
)
DD = 79
°

3
4
'

3
8
.
9
"
T = 31.
2
8
'e = EXI
S
T
I
N
G
-DRV1
-
PI Sta
5
+
6
6
.
1
3
L = 5
9
.
0
1
'
R = 7
2
.
0
0
'
VICINITY MAP
DATE:
PROJECT TEAMSHEET INDEX
8/16/2019 3:10 PM MARK TAYLOR N:\_2019\1019204\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\SD\19204_COVER SD.DWG
08/16/19
TOWN OF INDIAN TRAIL, UNION COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PHASE I SCHEMATIC DESIGN PACKAGE
THE HUB AT INDIAN TRAIL
SD-1.0 COVER SHEET
SD-1.1 SURVEY
EAS
T

INDEPENDENCE
B
LVD
SITE
LANDDESIGN, INC
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
CONTACT: MARK KIME, PLA
704.333.0325
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
OWNER/DEVELOPER
GREYSTAR GP II, LLC
521 E MOREHEAD ST, SUITE 400
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
CONTACT: JOSH GLOVER
704.379.1868
LANDDESIGN, INC
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
CONTACT: KRIS ROWE, PE
704.333.0325
CIVIL ENGINEER
SURVEYOR
LDSI, INC.
201 W 29TH ST
CHARLOTTE, NC 28026
CONTACT: DAVID BOYLES
704.309.8216
N IN
DI
A
N T
RAIL
R
DINDIAN TRAIL RDB
L
Y
T
H

D
R
SD-2.0 LAYOUT PLAN
SD-3.0 GRADING PLAN
SD-4.0 STORM DRAINAGE PLAN
SD-5.0 SANITARY SEWER PLAN
SD-6.0 WATER PLAN
CHESTNUT PKWYSD-2.1 SITE DETAILS
THE HUB AT
INDIAN TRAIL
GREYSTAR GP II, LLC
US 74 & CHESTNUT PARKWAY
INDIAN TRAIL. NC
1019204
SURVEY
LDI
JEM
MEK
SD-1.1
8/16/2019 3:10 PM MARK TAYLOR N:\_2019\1019204\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\SD\19204_SURVEY SD.DWG
(NOT TO SCALE)
NTS
KEY MAP
SEAL
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE
PROJECT
NORTH
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
HORZ:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704.333.0325
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE # C-0658
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SEAL
VERT:
NOT TO SCALE
N
E
L
S
O
N

L
E
M
M
O
N
D

D
R
4
L
E
V
E
L
S 105+00EA
S
T

I
N
D
E
P
E
N
D
E
N
C
E

B
L
V
D
CHE
S
T
N
U
T
P
K
W
Y
25.00'25.
0
0
'
R9.50'
7.
0
0
'9.75'2
4
.
0
0
'
1
8
.
0
0
'9.00'PROPERTY
BOUNDARY (TYP.)
STREAM
(TYP.)
COMMON
OPEN SPACE (TYP.)
MULT-FAMILY BUILDING (TYP.)
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY (TYP.)
(87)60 DEGREE PARKING SPACES
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
(TYP.)
PHA
SE LI
N
E
100 YEAR
FLOOD PLAIN
(TYP.)
WETLAND
(TYP.)TRASH ENCLOSURE (TYP.)
ENTRY GATE
(TYP.)
ENTRY GATE
(TYP.)
ENTRY GATE
(TYP.)
PHASE 2
HEAVY DUTY
ASPHALT(TYP.)
POOL DECK PAVING (TYP.)
7' CONCRETE
SW (TYP.)
P.A.
WETLAND
(TYP.)
POOL
STREAM
BUFFER (TYP.)
MONUMENT
SIGNAGE
EXISTING SS
EASEMENT
(TYP)
CLUBHOUSE
ADA
SPACES (TYP.)
ENTRY GATE
(TYP.)
LIGHT DUTY
ASPHALT(TYP.)
10' CONCRETE
SW (TYP.)
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
P.A.
CONCRETE
SIDEWALK (TYP.)
P.A.
P.A.
HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE (TYP.)
1'-6" CURB
& GUTTER (TYP.)
BUILDING
6
BUILDING
7
BUILDING
8
BUILDING
9
BUILDING
5
BUILDING
4
BUILDING
1
BUILDING
2
BUILDING
3
18.00'36.00'24.00'18.00'24.00'P.A.
THE HUB AT
INDIAN TRAIL
GREYSTAR GP II, LLC
US 74 & CHESTNUT PARKWAY
INDIAN TRAIL. NC
1019204
LAYOUT PLAN
LDI
JEM
MEK
SD-2.0
8/16/2019 3:10 PM MARK TAYLOR N:\_2019\1019204\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\SD\19204_PLN_LAYOUT SD.DWG
0
1"=60'
30'60'120'
KEY MAP
SEAL
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE
PROJECT
NORTH
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
HORZ:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704.333.0325
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE # C-0658
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SEAL
VERT:
LEGEND
COMMON OPEN SPACE
±86,417 SF (1.98 ACRES)
15.94%
PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL UNITS:350 UNITS
REQUIRED: DWELLINGS, MULTI-FAMILY
1.5 SPACES/UNIT
350 UNITS = 525 SPACES
PROVIDED: 525 SPACES ON-SITE
INCLUDING 20 ADA SPACES
MUNICIPAL INFORMATION & ZONING
TOTAL SITE ACREAGE: +/-28.284 AC.
MUNICIPALITY: TOWN OF INDIAN TRAIL, NC
ZONING:MXD (CD)
MINIMUM SETBACKS
EAST INDEPENDENCE BLVD:0 FT
N INDIAN TRAIL RD:0 FT
NELSON LEMMOND DR 0 FT
CHESTNUT PKWY:0 FT
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT:70 FEET
INDIAN TRAIL UDO TREE MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
NON-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE REPLANTING PLAN
SHALL BE AT 25% RATIO:
EXISTING CALIPER INCH = X
CALCULATION = X" CALIPER TREE X 25% = X" CALIPER
REPLACEMENT TREE OR TREES EQUIVALENT TO THAT
CUMULATIVE CALIPER.
MIN. REPLACEMENT TREE CALIPER: 2.5"
TREE SURVEY
A BASIC MEASURE OF STAND DENSITY FROM FIXED PLOTS
WAS USED TO DETERMINE THE NUMBER HERITAGE TREES
PER UNIT AREA, IN THIS CASE HERITAGE TREES PER ACRE
(HTPA). THE ONLY TREES INCLUDED IN THE CALCULATION ARE
TREES THAT ARE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 14INCHES DBH
FOR DECIDUOUS TREES AND 18 INCHES DBH FRO EVERGREEN
TREES.
DETERMINING HTPA FROM FIXED PLOTS:
1.DETERMINE THE EXPANSION FACTOR (THE NUMBER OF
TREES PER ACRE A GIVEN PLOT TREE REPRESENTS) BY
TAKING THE DENOMINATOR OF THE PLOT SIZE (1/10TH
ACRE) AND DIVIDING BY THE NUMBER OF PLOTS.
2.ADD UP THE TOTAL NUMBER OF HERITAGE TREES FOR
ALL THE PLOTS IN THE STAND.
3.MULTIPLY THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PLOT HERITAGE
TREES BY THE EXPANSION FACTOR TO DETERMINE THE
TOTAL HTPA FOR THE STAND.

LIGHT DUTY ASPHALT
+/-81,883 SF
HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT
+/-185,332 SF
HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE
+/-273 SF
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
+/-30,555 SF
POOL DECK PAVING
+/-5,394 SF
PLANTING AREA P.A.
LANDSCAPING/SCREENING
PARKING AREA TREE REQUIREMENTS: 1 LARGE OR 2 SMALL TREES
SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH 12 PARKING SPACES.
TOTAL SPACES: 525/12 = 44 TREES REQUIRED.
EACH SPACE SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 65' OF TREE
PARKING AREAS SHALL BE SCREENED FROM ADJACENT PUBLIC
ROADS WITH SHRUBS BASED ON THE MUNICIPALITY'S SPECIES LIST.
STORM BASIN DETENTIONS SHALL BE SCREENED WITH FENCING
AND OR SHRUBS AS DETERMINED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR AND
SHALL BE DEPENDANT UPON THE SIZE, LOCATION, AND USE OF THE
BASIN.
PLOT #COMMUNITY TYPE/#HERITAGE TREES PER PLOT
DESCRIPTION 14" DECIDUOUS 18" EVERGREEN
1 LOBLOLLY PINE DOMINATED 0
SUCCESSIONAL WOODS
2 MIXED HARDWOOD 4
DOMINATED PIEDMONT
BOTTOMLAND FOREST
3 LOBLOLLY PINE DOMINATED 0
SUCCESSIONAL FOREST
4 LOBLOLLY PINE DOMINATED 0
SUCCESSIONAL FOREST
5 LOBLOLLY PINE DOMINATED 0
SUCCESSIONAL FOREST
6 WHITE OAK DOMINATED 2
MESIC MIXED HARDWOOD
FOREST
7 LOBLOLLY PINE DOMINATED 0
SUCCESSIONAL FOREST
TOTAL #6
HERITAGE TREES
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
EXPANSION FACTOR = PLOT SIZE DENOMINATOR/PLOTS: 10/7 = 1.42
HTPA = #HERITAGE TREES X EXPANSION FACTOR
HTPA = 6 X 1.42 = 8.52 TREES
THE HUB AT
INDIAN TRAIL
GREYSTAR GP II, LLC
US 74 & CHESTNUT PARKWAY
INDIAN TRAIL. NC
1019204
SITE DETAILS
LDI
JEM
MEK
SD-2.1
8/16/2019 3:10 PM MARK TAYLOR N:\_2019\1019204\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\SD\19204_DTL_SITE_SD.DWG
(NOT TO SCALE)
NTS
KEY MAP
SEAL
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE
PROJECT
NORTH
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
HORZ:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704.333.0325
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE # C-0658
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SEAL
VERT:
NOTES:
1. CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY THIS PAVEMENT SECTION WITH
CONSULTING GEOTECH PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
2. SEE LAYOUT PLAN FOR CONTROL JOINT AND EXPANSION
JOINT SPACING.
3. CONCRETE SHALL BE 4000psi @ 28 DAYS.
4. SEE PAVING PLAN FOR CONCRETE FINISH.
5. WATERPROOFING SEALANT TO MATCH CONCRETE COLOR
1/2inBITUMINOUS EXPANSION JOINT @ 20ft MAX SPACING
AND AT VERTICAL WALLS. ALLOW 1/2in RECESS
BELOW TOP OF SLAB TO SEAL w/WATERPROOF SEALANT
CONTROL JOINT
TOOLED JOINTS PER PAVING AND LAYOUT PLAN
JOINTS TO BE 1/4inX 1-1/2in DEEP w/WATERPROOF SEALANT
8in AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, COMPACTED
95% COMPACTED SUBGRADE6"8"CONSTRUCTION JOINT
IF USED, INSTALL 5/8in DIA. SMOOTH STEEL DOWELS 18in O.C.,
3ft LONG. GREASE ON SIDE OF STEEL AND SEAL AS DESCRIBED
FOR CONTROL JOINTS (TOOLED JOINT)FACE OF WALLHEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT
3/4" = 1'-0"SECTIONSD-2.1
1
NOTES:
1. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW AND APPROVE ASPHALT
PAVEMENT DESIGN PER ACTUAL SOIL CONDITIONS AND OWNERS
LOADING REQUIREMENTS.
2. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE MIN. 5' x 5' MOCK-UP OF PAVERS AND
CONCRETE PAVING FOR CLIENT AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
REVIEW AND APPROVAL
SURFACE COURSE
SF9.5B - FINAL LIFT TO BE APPLIED AFTER 75% DEVELOPMENT
OCCUPANCY OR 1 YEAR FROM INTERMEDIATE COURSE PLACEMENT
(WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST).
INTERMEDIATE COURSE
I- 19.0B
BASE COURSE
COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
SUBGRADE
COMPACTED SUBGRADE (SEE SECTION 1.A.18)
1. SURFACE COURSE
1-2 SURFACE COURSE
HB BINDING COURSE
C.A.B.C.
2. BASE COURSE
ASPHALT PAVING
2. INTERMEDIATE COURSE
NOTE
TACK COAT
(SEE SECTION 1.E.4)
* APPLIED IN TWO EQUAL LIFTS SEE TABLE BELOWASPHALT TIE IN SECTION *NOT TO SCALE
MATCH EXISTING
FINISH ASPHALT
GRADE ELEVATIONEXISTING
ASPHALT
NEW ASPHALT
2'-0" MIN.
MILL 2'-0" MIN.
OF EXISTING
ASPHALT
SURFACE
COURSE
ASPHALT PAVEMENT
3/4" = 1'-0"SECTION
REGULAR
PARKING
SPACE
REGULAR
DRIVE
LANE
HEAVY
DUTY
2" *
1.5" *
6"
2" *
1.5" *
6"
2" *
1.5" *
8"
SD-2.1
2 STANDARD CURB + GUTTER
NTSSECTIONSD-2.1
3
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
NTSDETAIL SUBTITLESD-2.1
4
4
L
E
V
E
L
S
105
+00
E
A
S
T

I
N
D
E
P
E
ND
E
N
C
E

B
L
VD
CHE
S
T
N
U
T
P
K
W
Y
N
E
L
S
O
N

L
E
M
M
O
N
D

D
R
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY (TYP.)
STREAM
BUFFER (TYP.)
STREAM
(TYP.)
WETLAND
(TYP.)
POOL
MONUMENT
SIGNAGE
COMMON
OPEN SPACE (TYP.)
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY (TYP.)
(87)60 DEGREE PARKING SPACES
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
(TYP.)
ADA
SPACES (TYP.)
EXISTING SS
EASEMENT
(TYP)100 YEAR
FLOOD PLAIN
(TYP.)
WETLAND
(TYP.)TRASH ENCLOSURE (TYP.)
ENTRY GATE
(TYP.)
PHASE 2
BUILDING 1
FFE = 685.00
BUILDING 4
FFE = 684.00
BUILDING 5
FFE = 684.00
BUILDING 7
FFE = 683.00
BUILDING 8
FFE = 683.00
BUILDING 9
FFE = 682.00
BUILDING 6
FFE = 682.00
CLUBHOUSE
FFE = 682.00BUILDING 2
SPLIT-LEVEL
FFE = 691.00
FFE = 682.00
BUILDING 3
SPLIT-LEVEL
FFE = 696.00
FFE = 687.00
94.0
86.0
94.5
85.2
87.0
78.0
TC 81.7
BC 81.2
RIM 80.1
TC 81.7
BC 81.2
RIM 80.3
80.9
80.0
TC 81.7
BC 81.2
RIM 80.1
RIM 80.1
TC 81.7
BC 81.2
TC 81.7
BC 81.2
TC 81.7
BC 81.2
RIM 80.3
TC 80.8
BC 80.3
TC 80.8
BC 80.3
TC 81.7
BC 81.2
TC 81.7
BC 81.2
TC 81.7
BC 81.2
TC 82.7
BC 82.2
TC 82.7
BC 82.2
TC 82.7
BC 82.2
TC 82.7
BC 82.2
TC 83.7
BC 83.2
TC 83.7
BC 83.2
TC 83.7
BC 83.2
TC 83.7
BC 83.2
TC 83.7
BC 83.2
TC 84.7
BC 84.2
TC 84.7
BC 84.2
TC 81.7
BC 81.2
TC 81.7
BC 81.2
TC 86.7
BC 86.2
TC 86.7
BC 86.2
TC 86.7
BC 86.2
RIM 82.9
RIM 82.7
RIM 82.8
RIM 82.3
TC 82.7
BC 82.2
RIM 81.3
80.2
RIM 80.3
RIM 82.4
RIM 84.1
RIM 82.4
RIM 82.1
TC 83.7
BC 83.2
RIM 82.6
RIM 84.6
RIM 81.5
TC 82.7
BC 82.2
TC 82.6
BC 82.1
82.6
RIM 80.0
RIM 80.5
RIM 82.9
80.5
TC 83.4
BC 82.9
80.2
6926936946
9
4
694
693
692
692
6
9
2
6
9
0
6
8
7
6
9
0
6
9
1
6
9
0
6
8
9
6
8
8
6
8
7
6
8
6
6
8
5
6
9
3
6
8
4
6
8
6
6
8
8
6
9
0
6
9
2
6
8
5
6
8
7
6
8
9
6
9
1
690 685680675670
690
685
690685 684683681
68568
0
6
7
56756
8
568
0
690
688 686 684
6
9
2
694684682680678680
678
676674684 682682
682
682684684
686684692690
688
686
684
684680
6
8
0
6
7
6
6826826
8
2 680682
STORM PIPE (TYP.)
UNDERGROUND
DETENTION
THE HUB AT
INDIAN TRAIL
GREYSTAR GP II, LLC
US 74 & CHESTNUT PARKWAY
INDIAN TRAIL. NC
1019204
GRADING PLAN
LDI
JEM
MEK
SD-3.0
8/16/2019 3:11 PM MARK TAYLOR N:\_2019\1019204\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\SD\19204_PLN_GRADING SD.DWG
0
1"=60'
30'60'120'
KEY MAP
SEAL
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE
PROJECT
NORTH
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
HORZ:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704.333.0325
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE # C-0658
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SEAL
VERT:
KEY MAP
SEAL
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE
PROJECT
NORTH
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
HORZ:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704.333.0325
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE # C-0658
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SEAL
VERT:
SSSSSSSSSSSSW
W
W
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
SS
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
WWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
WSSW
SS
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWCI-28
RIM: 687.20
15" INV. OUT: 682.70 (CI-29)
CI-29
RIM: 686.00
15" INV. IN: 681.50 (CI-28)
15" INV. OUT: 681.50 (CI-31)
CI-31
RIM: 682.70
15" INV. IN: 677.75 (CI-29)
15" INV. IN: 677.75 (CI-30)
18" INV. OUT: 677.50 (CI-32)
CI-32
RIM: 682.60
18" INV. IN: 677.15 (CI-31)
CI-33
RIM: 682.60
24" INV. IN: 676.17 ()
24" INV. OUT: 676.17 (CI-34)
CI-34
RIM: 683.50
24" INV. IN: 675.16 (CI-33)
42" INV. IN: 667.45 (CI-27)
42" INV. OUT: 667.45 (MH-37)
CI-36
RIM: 682.40
15" INV. IN: 676.95 (CI-35)
15" INV. OUT: 676.95 (MH-37)
CI-27
RIM: 680.30
42" INV. IN: 667.95 (CI-26)
42" INV. OUT: 667.95 (CI-34)
CI-24
RIM: 680.30
36" INV. IN: 669.45 (CI-23)
42" INV. OUT: 668.95 (CI-25)
CI-16
RIM: 680.10
15" INV. IN: 675.62 (CI-15)
36" INV. IN: 671.85 (CI-14)
36" INV. OUT: 671.85 (CI-17)
CI-14
RIM: 680.00
30" INV. IN: 672.63 (CI-12)
15" INV. IN: 675.50 (CI-13)
36" INV. OUT: 672.13 (CI-16)
CI-22
RIM: 677.80
15" INV. IN: 673.06 (CI-21)
15" INV. OUT: 673.06 (CI-23)
CI-21
RIM: 677.80
15" INV. OUT: 673.30 (CI-22)
CI-1
RIM: 682.80
15" INV. OUT: 678.30 (CI-2)
CI-3
RIM: 682.30
15" INV. IN: 677.44 (CI-2)
18" INV. OUT: 677.19 (CI-4)
CI-4
RIM: 680.50
18" INV. IN: 675.75 (CI-3)
24" INV. OUT: 675.25 (CI-9)
CI-9
RIM: 680.30
24" INV. IN: 674.76 (CI-4)
15" INV. IN: 675.50 (CI-6)
15" INV. IN: 675.50 (CI-8)
30" INV. OUT: 674.26 (CI-10)
CI-5
RIM: 682.40
15" INV. OUT: 677.90 (CI-6)
CI-6
RIM: 682.10
15" INV. IN: 677.14 (CI-5)
15" INV. OUT: 677.14 (CI-9)
CI-11
RIM: 682.90
30" INV. IN: 673.76 (CI-10)
30" INV. OUT: 673.76 (CI-12)
CI-12
RIM: 681.30
30" INV. IN: 673.31 (CI-11)
30" INV. OUT: 673.31 (CI-14)
CI-7
RIM: 682.00
15" INV. OUT: 677.50 (CI-8)
CI-8
RIM: 682.00
15" INV. IN: 677.26 (CI-7)
15" INV. OUT: 677.26 (CI-9)
CI-35
RIM: 682.10
15" INV. OUT: 677.60 (CI-36)
CI-15
RIM: 680.20
15" INV. OUT: 675.70 (CI-16)
CI-17
RIM: 680.10
36" INV. IN: 670.89 (CI-16)
36" INV. OUT: 670.89 (CI-19)
CI-19
RIM: 680.10
36" INV. IN: 670.19 (CI-17)
15" INV. IN: 675.60 (CI-18)
36" INV. OUT: 670.19 (CI-20)
CI-18
RIM: 681.60
15" INV. OUT: 677.10 (CI-19)
BMP OUT
24" INV. OUT: 667.27 (HW-38)
HW-38
24" INV. IN: 666.74
CI-30
RIM: 682.90
15" INV. OUT: 678.40 (CI-31)
CI-26
RIM: 680.30
42" INV. IN: 668.02 (CI-25)
42" INV. OUT: 668.02 (CI-27)
BMP IN
42" INV. IN: 667.27 (MH-37)
CI-2
RIM: 682.80
15" INV. IN: 678.22 (CI-1)
15" INV. OUT: 678.22 (CI-3)
MH-37
RIM: 681.70
15" INV. IN: 676.35 (CI-36)
42" INV. IN: 667.31 (CI-34)
42" INV. OUT: 667.31 (BMP IN)
CI-13
RIM: 680.60
15" INV. OUT: 676.10 (CI-14)
CI-10
RIM: 680.50
30" INV. IN: 674.18 (CI-9)
30" INV. OUT: 674.18 (CI-11)
CI-25
RIM: 680.30
42" INV. IN: 668.54 (CI-24)
42" INV. OUT: 668.54 (CI-26)
CI-20
RIM: 679.80
36" INV. IN: 670.00 (CI-19)
36" INV. OUT: 670.00 (CI-23)
CI-23
RIM: 679.80
15" INV. IN: 672.12 (CI-22)
36" INV. IN: 669.79 (CI-20)
36" INV. OUT: 669.79 (CI-24)
35.30 LF OF 15" RCP @ 3.40%
119.22
L
F

O
F

1
5
"

R
C
P

@

3
.
1
4
%
59.38 LF OF 18" RCP @ 0.60%
80.00 LF OF 24" RCP @ 0.60%166.86 LF OF 24"
R
C
P
@ 0.60
%
99.97 LF OF 15" RCP @ 0.60%
99.00 LF OF 42" RCP @ 0.50%
24.04 LF OF 15" RCP @ 1.00%
157.03

L
F

O
F
1
5
"

R
C
P
@

0
.
6
0
%
14.03 LF OF 15" RCP @ 0.60%
96.32 LF OF 18" RCP @ 1.49%
99.00 LF OF 24" RCP @ 0.50%
1
2
6
.
0
1

L
F

O
F

1
5
"
R
C
P
@

0
.
6
0%
88.57 LF OF 15" RCP @ 1.85%
14.03 LF OF 30" RCP @ 0.50%
24.06 LF OF 15" RCP @ 1.00%
52.09 LF OF 15" RCP @ 3.37%
1
0
8
.
0
0

L
F

O
F

1
5
"

R
C
P
@

0
.
6
0%
81.29 LF OF 42" RCP @ 0.50%
14.10 LF OF 15" RCP @ 0.60%
191
.
4
9

L
F

O
F

3
6
"

R
C
P

@

0
.
5
0
%
68.36 LF OF 36" RCP @ 0.50%
61.84 LF OF 15" RCP @ 2.43%
106.60 LF OF 24" RCP @ 0.50%
1
0
8
.
0
0

L
F

O
F

1
5
"

R
C
P
@

0
.
6
0%
14.03 LF OF 42" RCP @ 0.50%
8.07 LF OF 42" RCP @ 0.50%
29.02 LF OF 42" RCP @ 0.50%
105.12 LF OF 42" RCP @ 0.50%
84.97 LF OF 30" RCP @ 0.50%
56.16 LF OF 36" RCP @ 0.50%
1
4
1
.
0
6

L
F

O
F

3
6
"

R
C
@

0
.
5
0
%
1
2
9
.
9
7

L
F
O
F

1
5
"

R
C
P
@

0
.
6
0%
89.96 LF OF 30" RCP @ 0.50%135.78 LF OF 30" RC @ 0.50%22.51 LF OF 15" RCP @ 2.67%
38.35 LF OF 36" RCP @ 0.50%
41.04 LF OF 36" RCP @ 0.50%
THE HUB AT
INDIAN TRAIL
GREYSTAR GP II, LLC
US 74 & CHESTNUT PARKWAY
INDIAN TRAIL. NC
1019204
STORM DRAINAGE PLAN
KWR
LDI
LDI
SD-4.0
8/16/2019 3:11 PM MARK TAYLOR N:\_2019\1019204\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\SD\19204_PLN_STORM.DWG
0
1"=60'
30'60'120'
KEY MAP
SEAL
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE
PROJECT
NORTH
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
HORZ:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704.333.0325
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE # C-0658
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SEAL
VERT:
E

IND
E
P
END
ENC
E
B
LVD
CHESTNUT PARKWAYCH
E
S
TN
U
T

SQ
U
A
R
E
D
R
I
V
E
PROJECT BOUNDARY (TYP)
POOL
CLUBHOUSE
EXIST. WETLNDS (TYP)
EXIST. STREAM (TYP)
30' STREAM BUFFER (TYP)
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN (TYP)
EXIST. WETLNDS (TYP)
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN (TYP)
EXIST. STREAM (TYP)
30' STREAM BUFFER (TYP)
PROJECT BOUNDARY (TYP)
EXIST. SANITARY SEWER (TYP)
PROP. SANITARY SEWER (TYP)
(SEE SHEET SD-5.0)
BUILDING
5
BUILDING
8
BUILDING
9
BUILDING
7
BUILDING
4
BUILDING
3
BUILDING
2
BUILDING
1
BUILDING
6
PROP. WATERMAIN (TYP)
(SEE SHEET SD-6.0)
PROP. 40' X 200' X 5' UNDERGROUND
CONCRETE BOX STRUCTURE
SSSSSSSSSSSSW
W
W
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
SS
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
WWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
WSSW
SS
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWSSMH-7
RIM: 685.59
8" INV. OUT: 681.38 (SSMH-6)
EX. SSMH-0
RIM: 673.28
8" INV. IN: 666.66 (SSMH-1)
8" INV. IN: 666.66
8" INV. OUT: 666.46
SSMH-10
RIM: 683.57
8" INV. OUT: 679.24 (SSMH-9)
SSMH-9
RIM: 682.18
8" INV. IN: 678.06 (SSMH-10)
8" INV. OUT: 677.86 (SSMH-8)
SSMH-8
RIM: 682.00
8" INV. IN: 677.53 (SSMH-9)
8" INV. OUT: 677.33 (SSMH-5)
SSMH-6
RIM: 684.01
8" INV. IN: 678.99 (SSMH-7)
8" INV. OUT: 678.79 (SSMH-5)
SSMH-1
RIM: 680.59
8" INV. IN: 668.01 (SSMH-3)
8" INV. IN: 668.01 (SSMH-2)
8" INV. OUT: 667.81 (EX. SSMH-0)
SSMH-4
RIM: 680.82
8" INV. IN: 675.31 (SSMH-5)
8" INV. OUT: 675.11 (SSMH-3)
SSMH-3
RIM: 680.52
8" INV. IN: 671.72 (SSMH-4)
8" INV. OUT: 672.39 (SSMH-1)
SSMH-2
RIM: 680.62
8" INV. OUT: 676.17 (SSMH-1)
SSMH-5
RIM: 681.99
8" INV. IN: 676.44 (SSMH-6)
8" INV. IN: 676.44 (SSMH-8)
8" INV. OUT: 676.23 (SSMH-4)398.20 LF OF 8" PVC Pipe @ 0.60%94.36 LF OF 8" PVC Pipe @ 2.50%153.63 LF OF 8" P
V
C Pipe
@ 0.60
%
169
.
8
2

L
F

O
F

8
"

P
V
C

P
i
p
e

@

2
.
0
0
%
58.46 LF OF 8" PVC Pipe @ 7.50%
191.55 LF OF 8" PVC Pipe @ 0.60%
1
9
6
.
6
9

L
F

O
F

8
"

P
VC

P
i
p
e
@

0
.
6
0%
54.39 LF OF 8" PVC Pipe @ 0.60%149.51 LF OF 8"
P
V
C
Pipe
@ 0.60
%
1
0
8
.
7
9

L
F
O
F

8
"

P
V
C

P
i
p
e
@

7
.
5
0%
THE HUB AT
INDIAN TRAIL
GREYSTAR GP II, LLC
US 74 & CHESTNUT PARKWAY
INDIAN TRAIL. NC
1019204
SANITARY SEWER PLAN
KWR
LDI
LDI
SD-5.0
8/16/2019 3:11 PM MARK TAYLOR N:\_2019\1019204\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\SD\19204_PLN_SANITARY SEWER.DWG
0
1"=60'
30'60'120'
KEY MAP
SEAL
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE
PROJECT
NORTH
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
HORZ:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704.333.0325
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE # C-0658
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SEAL
VERT:
E

IND
E
P
END
ENC
E
B
LVD
CHESTNUT PARKWAY
CH
E
S
TN
U
T

SQ
U
A
R
E
D
R
I
V
E
PROJECT BOUNDARY (TYP)
POOL
CLUBHOUSE
EXIST. WETLNDS (TYP)
EXIST. STREAM (TYP)
30' STREAM BUFFER (TYP)
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN (TYP)
EXIST. WETLNDS (TYP)
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN (TYP)
EXIST. STREAM (TYP)
30' STREAM BUFFER (TYP)
PROJECT BOUNDARY (TYP)
EXIST. SANITARY SEWER (TYP)
6" SEWER SERVICE
@ 1.00% SLOPE
6" SEWER SERVICE
@ 1.00% SLOPE
6" SEWER SERVICE
@ 1.00% SLOPE
6" SEWER SERVICE
@ 1.00% SLOPE
6" SEWER SERVICE
@ 1.00% SLOPE
6" SEWER SERVICE
@ 1.00% SLOPE
6" SEWER SERVICE
@ 1.00% SLOPE
BUILDING
7
BUILDING
2
BUILDING
1
BUILDING
6
BUILDING
5
BUILDING
8
BUILDING
9
BUILDING
3
BUILDING
4
6" SEWER SERVICE
@ 1.00% SLOPE
6" SEWER SERVICE
@ 1.00% SLOPE
6" SEWER SERVICE
@ 1.00% SLOPE PROP. BMP
PROP. STORM DRAINAGE (TYP)
(SEE SHEET SD-4.0)
PROP. WATER (TYP)
(SEE SHEET SD-6.0)
EXIST. 20' SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT
35' (L) X 15' (W) X 8'(D)
BORE PIT
8' (L) X 5' (W) X 8' (D)
RECEIVING PIT
±115 LF OF 16" STEEL
ENCASING PIPE (t=0.250")
±115 LF OF JACK AND BORE
SSSSSSSSSSSSW
W
W
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
SS
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
WWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
WSSW
SS
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WW105+0
0
THE HUB AT
INDIAN TRAIL
GREYSTAR GP II, LLC
US 74 & CHESTNUT PARKWAY
INDIAN TRAIL. NC
1019204
WATER PLAN
KWR
LDI
LDI
SD-6.0
8/16/2019 3:11 PM MARK TAYLOR N:\_2019\1019204\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\SD\19204_PLN_WATER.DWG
0
1"=60'
30'60'120'
KEY MAP
SEAL
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE
PROJECT
NORTH
NO.DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
HORZ:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704.333.0325
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
NC ENG. FIRM LICENSE # C-0658
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SEAL
VERT:
E

IND
E
P
END
ENC
E
B
LVD
CHESTNUT PARKWAY
C
H
E
S
T
N
U
T

SQU
A
R
E

D
R
I
V
E
PROJECT BOUNDARY (TYP)
PROP. 8" DIP
FIRE LINE (TYP)
PROP. 6" X 6" X 6" TEE
POOL
CLUBHOUSE
EXIST. WETLNDS (TYP)
EXIST. STREAM (TYP)
30' STREAM BUFFER (TYP)
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN (TYP)
EXIST. WETLNDS (TYP)
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN (TYP)
EXIST. STREAM (TYP)
30' STREAM BUFFER (TYP)
PROJECT BOUNDARY (TYP)
EXIST. SANITARY SEWER (TYP)
PROP. SANITARY SEWER (TYP)
(SEE SHEET SD-5.0)
PROP. STORM DRAINAGE (TYP)
(SEE SHEET SD-4.0)
PROP. BACKFLOW
PREVENTION ASSEMBLY
PROP. 8" METER
PROP. 8"-45° BEND
PROP. 8"-11.25° BEND
PROP. 6"-22.5° BEND
PROP. 8"-22.5° BEND
PROP. 6"-90° BEND
PROP. FIRE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY (TYP)
PROP. 8" GATE VALVE
PROP. 8" X 2" REDUCER
PROP. 2" BLOWOFF
PROP. 6"-45° BEND
PROP. 8"-90° BEND
PROP. 8"-11.25° BEND
PROP. 6" X 6" X 6" TEE
6" GATE VALVE
PROP. 6"-90° BEND
PROP. SANITARY SEWER (TYP)
(SEE SHEET SD-5.0)
PROP. FIRE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY (TYP)
PROP. 8"-90° BEND
BMP
100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN (TYP)
PROP. FIRE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY (TYP)
PROP. 6" X 6" X 6" TEE
PROP. 6"-11.25° BEND
TYPICAL BUILDING
WATER SERVICE
TYPICAL BUILDING
WATER SERVICE
TYPICAL BUILDING
WATER SERVICE
TYPICAL BUILDING
WATER SERVICE
TYPICAL BUILDING
WATER SERVICE
TYPICAL BUILDING
WATER SERVICE
TYPICAL BUILDING
WATER SERVICE
TYPICAL BUILDING
WATER SERVICE
TYPICAL BUILDING
WATER SERVICE
TYPICAL BUILDING
WATER SERVICE
PROP. 8" DIP FIRE
LINE (TYP)
BUILDING
5
BUILDING
8
BUILDING
9
BUILDING
7
BUILDING
4
BUILDING
3
BUILDING
2
BUILDING
1
BUILDING
6
PROP. 6"-45° BEND
PROP. 6" DIP
DOMESTIC
WATER LINE (TYP)
PROP. 6"-11.25° BEND
PROP. FIRE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY (TYP)
PROP. 6" METER
PROP. 8"-90° BEND
PROP. 6"-90° BEND
PROP. 6"-11.25° BEND
PROP. 8"-45° BEND
PROP. 6" GATE VALVE
PROP. 6" X 2" REDUCER
PROP. 2" BLOWOFF
PROP. 6" DIP DOMESITC
WATER LINE (TYP)
PROP. 6"-90° BEND
PROP. 8" DIP FIRE
LINE (TYP)
PROP. 6" DIP DOMESITC
WATER LINE (TYP)
PROP. 8" X 8" X 8" TEE
8" GATE VALVE
PROP. 8"-11.25° BEND
PROP. 8"-90° BEND
Note that building 8 is one
building with a fire wall. These
two should be combined.
Job: 1019204_AGTEK 2
Units: Ft-CY
Tue Aug 06, 2019 08:41:50 Page 1

Volume Report
Design vs. Stripped

Area Volume Comp/Ratio Compact Export Change
Total Cut Fill OnGrade Cut Fill Cut Fill Cut Fill -Import Per .1 Ft
_REPORT REGION 502,634 265,111 225,388 12,135 24,415 19,757 1.00 1.00 24,415 19,757 4,658 1,862

Plane Slope
Stripping Qtys Area Area Depth Volume
_STRIPPING AREA 502,634 503,205 1.000 18,637
0 180.2 360.4
3.75
3.50
3.25
3.00
2.75
2.50
2.25
2.00
1.75
1.50
1.25
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
± .100
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
3.50
3.75