10040_Almont Shipping-New-NWP-EMP

NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in the
North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.
The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory -compliant
decision -making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP, including
contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have questions.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development -related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project, and
approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of the
EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be cause for
a reopener
So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.
® Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields' objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.
® Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant and
applicable to the proposed redevelopment:
® A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if not
conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted. See Attachment 1
® A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for each
media. See Attachment 2 for extent of the Brownfields property. It is assumed that some
degree of soil contamination is present under all of the property. The extent of
contamination under the Brownfields program is documented in previous reports. It is
assumed that all of the portions of the site that received dredge spoil from the Marina that
were deposited on the site to the depths shown on Attachment 2 are contaminated with
low levels of metals based upon the analyses included in Attachment 2
© Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis. See Attachment 3 Cut and Fill Analysis
® A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain on site
after construction grading. See Attachment 2 — All impacted soil will remain on site — see
table in Attachment 3 for impacted soil volume to be reused on site
© Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.). See Attachment 4 -
Approved Sediment and Erosion Control Plan. An Industrial Discharge Permit has been
applied for with Cape Fear Public Utility Authority for discharge of dewatering water and is
in process. — See Attachment 5 The Stormwater Permit for the project is in the approval
process — See Attachment 6.
® A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction. See
Attachment 7
© Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas, etc.)
applicable to the proposed redevelopment. See Attachment 2
© Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment. See Attachment 2
© A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final. See Sheets
and in Attachment 1.
® If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for brownfields
approval. To be Determined and Approved by Brownfields
® Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources, detailing
the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property. To be
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Determined and Approved by Brownfields
® A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines. To be
determined and submitted to Brownfields once the sources of materials subject to
sampling and analysis are identified
© A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export and
sampling data from those areas. No materials from the site are to be exported
permanently. See Attachment 3 for the volume of clean cap material to be removed,
stored temporarily at a site to be determined, mixed with mulch and brought back on site.
❑ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor Intrusion
Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer. The
VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover. Not Applicable to Site
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Date:4/18/2019
GENERAL INFORMATION
Revision Date (if applicable): Click or tap to enter a date.
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Almont Shipping — North Waterfront Park Portion
Brownfields Project Number: 10040-06-65
Brownfields Property Address: Between Harnett and Cowan Streets West of Front Street
Brownfields Property Area (acres): 6.5
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ....................... ❑ Yes ® No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit............ ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, enter Permit No.: l ICK or tap n�, � LJ enter text.
COMMUNICATIONS
A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers that may
be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the EMP shall be
maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP DOES NOT TAKE THE
PLACE OF A SITE -SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.
Prospective Developer (PD): City of Wilmingron
Contact Person: Amy Beatty
Phone Numbers: Office: 910-341-7854
Email: [e-mail]
Contractor for PD: Clancy & Theys Construction Company
Contact Person: David Gadalla
Phone Numbers: Office: 910.392.5220
Email: [e-mail]
Environmental Consultant: Eagle Resources, P.A.
Contact Person: Eric Lappala
Phone Numbers: Office: Click or tap hereto enter text.
Email: [e-mail]
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Samuel P. Watson
Phone Numbers: Office: 910-796-7408
Email: mailto:[e-mail]
Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Mobile: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
Mobile: `'lick or tap here to enter text.
Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch, Hazardous
Waste, Solid Waste):
4
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Click or tap here to enter text.
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept minimum
advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsitetask:
On -site assessment or remedial activities: .................................................... 10 days Prior
Construction or grading start: .......................................................................... 10 days Prior
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously unknown
contamination: ................................................................................ Within 48 hours
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in area of
contamination, ventilation of work zones): ................................... Within 48 hours IK
Installation of mitigation systems: ................................................................ 10 days Prior
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies toimplement redevelopment activities: (as
applicable): ................................................................................. Within 30 days
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
❑Residential ®Recreational ❑Institutional ❑Commercial ❑Office ❑Retail ❑ Industrial
El Other specify:
Click or tap here to enter text.
2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth -moving activitiesat the
site:
® Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
® Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility lines,
etc.
® Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if detailed
plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
See Attachment 1
4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?: See Sheet C-101-PI in Attachment 1
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
EMP Version 2, June 2018

❑ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with applicable
legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos abatement that are
administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public Health of the North Carolina
Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please provide a copy of your demolition permit.
5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
® If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with applicable
legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion control measures,
they may not begin until this EMP is approved.
See Attachment 1 Sheets C-112-P1 and C-113-P-1 Note that 30 ft x 50 ft Vehicle Washdown pads will
be included at the construction entrances Each to be 12 inches of #57 stone over non -woven
geotextile.
Attachment 1A: Approved S&EC Permit from NC DEQ. (Washdown pad approval from Land Quality
Division is in process)
6) Which category of risk -based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the Brownfields
Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall be cited in the
Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
❑ Residential ® Non -Residential or Industrial/Commercial
7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 7/8/2019
b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
See Attachment 5
c) Additional phases planned? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
UICK or tap nere to enter text.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
'lick or tap here to enter text.
Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: No buildings will be occupied
EMP Version 2, June 2018

CONTAMINATED MEDIA
1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil: ..............................................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater: ............................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water: ..........................................
❑
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment: ...................................................
❑
Yes
❑ No
® Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ..................................................
❑
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
Part 6. Sub -Slab Soil Vapor: ..................................
❑
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air: ...................................................
❑
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data summaries
for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.
Entire Brownfields portion of property is underlain by dredge spoil from the Wilmington Marina and is
covered with 2 feet of clean cover. See Attachment 2
PART 1. Soil — Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using
known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure overlaying new
construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
See Attachmebnt 2
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
4-10 feet See Attachment 2
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
Approximately 6 acres
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
0 to 9 feet
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
See Attachment 3
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
Approximately 3,600 CY — See Attachment 3
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
None
7
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please provide a
grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are acceptable, if only
preliminarydata available).
1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous Waste
Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ❑Yes ®No
❑ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
' Hrl, nr +nn here to enfnr tnvf
❑ If yes, do the soils exceed the "Contained -Out" levels in Attachment 1 of the North
Carolina Contained -In Policy? ................................................. ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS THE
CONTAINED -OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA CONTAINED -IN POLICY
THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH
DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE? .................................... ❑ Yes ® No
❑ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
❑ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text
❑ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Toxicity (7lick or tap here to enter text.
❑ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual hazardous
constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory TCLP standard)
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ If no, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.
d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE SOIL
MAYNOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ
HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
8
EMP Version 2, June 2018

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in place
with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
❑ Preliminary Health -Based Residential SRGs
❑ Preliminary Health -Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
® Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
❑ Site -specific risk -based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
L,I IL,K VI Ld P IICIC LU CI ILCI LCXL.
Additional comments:
, 11L,A Lei LOP I Lcl c w enter text.
3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary, please check
the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of same. Please attach
a proposed location diagram/site map.
❑ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
® Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map to
Brownfields Project Manager once known
❑ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
See drawing Sheet LS-003-PI in Attachment 1
® Manage soil under impervious cap ® or clean fill
® Describe cap or fill:
2 feet of clean sand fill mixed with organic mulch. Clean sand fill will comprise 1 foot of existing
on -site clean cap removed to off -site facility supplemented with additional clean sand and
organic mulch. Sources of additional clean sand and organic mulch to be identified, sampled, and
tested for the constituents listed in the attached table and results provided to NC Brownfields
contact person. Such materials may not be placed on site without approval of NC Brownfields
❑ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re -recorded if actions are
Post -Recordation).
❑ GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
❑ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:
Click or tap here to enter text.
4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and management of
site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
❑ Yes, describe the method will include:
Periodic wetting of dry areas subject to traffic or other activities that produce potential for
EMP Version 2, June 2018

fugitive dust
❑ No, explain rationale:
vi Lop i ici c ,, enter text.
Field Screening of site soil
❑ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting field
screening:
Click or tap here to enter text.
® No, explain rationale:
Excavated contaminated materials will be replaced on site and do not need screening
Soil Sample Collection
❑ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in -situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
® No, explain rationale:
No contaminated materials are to be removed from the site
If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
❑ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
❑ Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
❑ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click Oi LOP iicic w ciiLci Lcn.
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
rii-i- — tap here to ent— te—
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
or tap here to ente '-
® Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted in
accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion control,
prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing
contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as needed:
See Attachment 4
❑ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or permanent
10
EMP Version 2, June 2018

hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes below (Check all that
apply):
❑ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
❑ Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
❑ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.):
Click or tap here to enter text
Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil sampling
locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology. Samples should
be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs which should be taken
from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, a work plan for final grade sampling may be
submitted under separate cover.
® If final grade sampling was NOT selected please explain rationale:
Final grade will be established using 2 feet of clean sand fill mixed with organic mulch. In all areas not
covered by hardscape. Clean sand fill will comprise 1 foot of existing on -site clean cap removed to off -
site facility supplemented with additional clean sand and organic mulch. Sources of additional clean
sand and organic mulch to be identified, sampled, and tested for the constituents listed in the attached
table and results provided to NC Brownfields contact person. Such materials may not be placed on site
without approval of NC Brownfields.
11
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Part 1. B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL
NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, "Documenting imported soil (by sampling,
analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written approval in advance by the Brownfields
Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided by the brownfields agreement and is in the
best interest of the prospective developer/property owner."
Requirements for importing fill:
1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ................................................ ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
Approximately 1,900 CY of mulch — See Attachment 3
3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (if a range of
depths, please list the range.)
Two feet to 12 feet
4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns, etc.
Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
Clean sand fill will comprise 1 foot of existing on -site clean cap removed to off -site facility
supplemented with additional clean sand and organic mulch. Sources of additional clean sand and
organic mulch to be identified, sampled, and tested for the constituents listed in the attached table
and results provided to NC Brownfields contact person. Such materials may not be placed on site
without approval of NC Brownfields.
The proposed sources of organic material are to be determine by contractor, tested and approved by
Brownfields,
The proposed sources of inorganic sand material are to be determine by contractor, tested and
approved by Brownfields.
5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill soil to
demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be approved for
use atthe Brownfields property.
To be provided by contractor once the source of much is identified.
6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 6020 / 200.8
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Fick or tap here to enter tex
12
EMP Version 2, June 2018

❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
here to Pr
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.):
-"-I- -._ ­.- `- —^ter tex
7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan submitted
separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in -situ borrow sites. If using
a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought onto the Brownfields Property.
To be provided by once mulch source is identified
Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL
NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE BROWNFIELDS
PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWN FIELDS AGREEMENT CAUSING A
REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM, ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS
AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW
MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES.
Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for additional details.
1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will be
excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of export and
sampling results included.
Export will be limited to approximately 9,100 CY of the existing clean cap that will be removed prior to
any other construction and temporarily stored off -site for mixing with organic mulch. See
Attachment 3.
2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent? Not Applicable
❑ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by landfill)
❑ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be determined by
the accepting Landfill;
❑ Landfarm or other treatment facility
❑ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property — determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or similar
contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase the potential for
risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields property, and thata
record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of the receiving site is provided
to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
❑ Use as Beneficial Fill off -site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide documentation of
approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will also require approval by
the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is provided in IR 15. Please provide
additional details below.
3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide details
related to the proposed plans).
+icK or tap nere to enter text.
13
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Part 1. D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
❑ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)
® Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is nota hazardous
waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths theywere removed from
such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth from which it was
excavated.
❑ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, and/or
degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
❑ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials:
Click or tap here to enter text
® If no, include rationale here:
Previous BF Investigations show no vapor hazard under site
Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Click or tap here to enter texl-
PART 2. GROUNDWATER— Please fill out the information below.
1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
Perched watertable at 2-3 feet permanent water table at 8 to 10 feet
2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ®onsite ❑offsite ❑both or ❑unknown sources?
Describe source(s):
Previous usage of site and placement of dredge spoils
3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
East to west towards the Northeast Cape Fear River
4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
®Yes ❑No
If yes, describe these activities:
Excavation of materials adjacent to the NE Cape Fear River, foundation excavations
Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during
redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of
groundwater (e.g., dewateringof groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing,
offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or sampling procedures).
To be disposed of under Industrial Discharge Permit to CFPUA sanitary sewer
5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property? ................. ❑X Yes ❑ No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?.................................................................................................................. Eyes ❑ No
14
EMP Version 2, June 2018

6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously unidentified
wells.
® Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It is the
Brownfields Program's intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as specified in the
Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring through another section of
DEQ or the EPA.
❑ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
❑ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
❑ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further disturbance until
notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for abandonment is given.
7) Please provide additional details as needed:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not permissible.
If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD be responsible for
replacement of the well.
PART 3. SURFACE WATER -Please fill out the information below.
1) Is surface water present at the property? ® Yes ❑ No
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property. See attached site
map in Attachment 2
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ❑ Yes ® No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ® Yes ❑ No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities, or
clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of such events (e.g.
flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
Only equipment contact during excavation of embayment into site from NE Cape Fear River
PART 4. SEDIMENT— Please fill out the information below.
1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ® Yes ❑ No
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ® Yes ❑ No
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment activities? ❑
Yes ® No
4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property. See Attachment 2
15
EMP Version 2, June 2018

5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
See Approved Sediment and Erosion Control Plan in Attachment 4
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR — Please fill out the information below.
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following
vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Groundwater:..... El Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
Groundwater: ..... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site screening
levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?
Click or tap here to enter text.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities
(trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management of such
contact:
Click u, LOP I C CLU �11«l
PART 6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR — Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or foundations will be
retained in the redevelopment.
1) Are sub -slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) If data indicate that sub -slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing the
location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub -slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ❑0-6 inches ❑Other, please
describe:
UIcK or tap nere to enter text.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub -slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
ick or tap here to enter tex
16
EMP Version 2, June 2018

PART 7. INDOOR AIR —Please fill out the information below.
1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk -based screening levels will not be
demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated indoor air during
planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Not Applicable
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list activities
for management of such contact:
LucK Ur LdP f ICf C LU tHU21 B2AL.
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM — Please fill out the information below.
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
If yes, ❑ VIMS Plan Attached or ❑ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
I.III.K UI LOP I ICI C LU CI IICI ICJ,
VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer
If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
Llick or tap here to enter text.
CONTINGENCY PLAN — encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials
In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown potential new
sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon that unknown tanks,
drums, fuel lines, landfills, orother waste materials are encountered. Notification to DEQ Brownfields
Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other officials, as necessary and appropriate, is
required when new potential source(s) of contamination are discovered. These Notification
Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this EMP.
Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be
notified and a sampling plan will be prepared based on the EMP requirements and site -specific factors. Samples will generally be collected to
document the location of the potential impacts.
Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
17
EMP Version 2, June 2018

® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver)
EPA 6020 / 200.8
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should be
conducted, even if not listed here.
Click or tap here to enter text.
Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields
Properties.
Click or tap here to enter text.
Underground Storage Tanks:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Sub -Grade Feature/Pit:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Buried Waste Material:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Re -Use of Impacted Soils On -Site:
Click or tap here to enter text.
If unknown, impacted soil is identified on -site, management on -site can be considered after the project
team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part I.A. Item 11, for Brownfields Project Manager
approval prior to final placement on -site.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as needed below:
Click or tap here to enter text.
POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
® Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the project.
If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be due by January 31
of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of this EMP (as agreed upon
with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as physical redevelopment of the
18
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Brownfields Property continues, except that the final Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted
within 90 days after completion of redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the
first Redevelopment Summary Report is anticipated to be submitted on Click or tap to enter a date.
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment -related activities since the last report,
with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and ultimate
disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed to be
contaminated with regulated substances; and
S. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example, concrete,
demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required manifests shall be
included).
❑ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site's Brownfields Agreement.
19
EMP Version 2, June 2018

APPROVAL SIGNATURES
Brownfields Project Number: 10040-06-65
Brownfields Project Name: Almont Shipping — North Waterfront Park Portion
A, cutai--
ProspectiVe Developer: Click or tap here to enter text. Date 5/8/2019
Printed Name/Title/Company: City of Wilmington
Consultant: Click or tap here to enter text. Date 5/7/2019
Printed Name itle/Company: Eric G. Lappala P.E.
/ 1�201
rownfield Project anagenClick or tap here to enter text. Da Chi or tap to en er a date.
20
EMP Version 2,June 2018

Figure 1
NCBP Diagram for Temporary
Containment of Impacted or Potentially
Impacted Soil
Cross -Section View
Top Plastic Cover Sheeting: Underliner: 1 layer, minimum of 10
(1 Layer, minimum: 10 mil thick) mil thick plastic
Berm
(Straw bales, Weight
composted earth, etc.) (If plastic
cover used)
Land
Surface Contaminated Soils
\i � i
Map View
Straw Bale Berm
EJ Weight
D
O
■ Contaminated Soils ■
■
o Plastic
Sheeting
Note: Adapted from NC DEQ UST Section "Guidelines for Ex Situ Petroleum Contaminated Soil Remediation" dated December, 1, 2013
21
EMP Version 2, June 2018