22031_Former K-Town Furniture EMP- Final 20180808

Via Email

August 8, 2018

NC DEQ – Brownfields Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646

Attn: Mr. Bill Schmithorst, PG
Re: Environmental Management Plan (Revision 2)
Former K-Town Furniture
Proposed Ballpark and Entertainment Venue
Kannapolis, North Carolina Brownfields Project No. 22031-18-013
H&H Job No. KAN-012

Dear Bill:
Enclosed is the Environmental Management Plan (EMP), Revision 2 for the former K-Town Furniture (Proposed Ballpark and Entertainment Venue) site located in Kannapolis, North Carolina
(Brownfields Project No. 22031-18-013) for your review and approval. If no further modifications
are necessary, please provide a signed copy of the EMP approval page for our records.
Thank you for your assistance with this project. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call us at [phone].

Sincerely, Hart & Hickman, PC
Shannon Cottrill
Project Manager

Enclosure
cc: Ms. Mary Katherine Stukes, Parker Poe (Via Email)
Mr. Walter M. Safrit, II, City of Kannapolis (Via Email)
Mr. Wilmer Melton, III, City of Kannapolis (Via Email)

Environmental Management Plan

Former K-Town Furniture
Proposed Ballpark and Entertainment Venue
Kannapolis, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 22031-18-013

H&H Job No. KAN-012
August 8, 2018
Revision 2

i
S:\AAA-Master Projects\City of Kannapolis - KAN\KAN-012 Infrastructure, Streetscape, & Baseball Projects\EMP\EMP Cover and Contingency Plan.docx
Environmental Management Plan (Revision 2) Former K-Town Furniture
Proposed Ballpark and Entertainment Venue
Kannapolis, North Carolina
Brownfield Project #22013-18-013 H&H Job No. (KAN-012)
Table of Contents

Completed EMP Template Form (EMP Version 2 – dated June 1, 2018)

List of Tables

Table 1 Summary of Phase II ESA and Brownfields Soil Analytical Data
Table 2 Summary of Soil Stockpile Analytical Data
Table 3 Summary of Groundwater Elevation Data
Table 4 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data

List of Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Sample Location Map
Figure 4 Soil Stockpile Sample Location Map

List of Appendices

Appendix A Site Layout/Grading Plan/Cut and Fill Maps
Appendix B Redevelopment Schedule
Appendix C Export Site Information

1
EMP Version 2, June 2018
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.

The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory-compliant
decision-making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.

Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development-related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project,
and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be
cause for a reopener

So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.

☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.

☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.

2
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:

☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.

☒ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.

☒ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.

☒ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
on site after construction grading.

☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).

☒ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.

☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☒ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.

☒ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.

☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.

☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.

☒ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.

☐ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.

3
EMP Version 2, June 2018
GENERAL INFORMATION

Date: 8/8/2018 Revision Date (if applicable): Revision 1

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Former K-Town Furniture

Brownfields Project Number: 22031-18-013

Brownfields Property Address: Parcel Nos. 56135999040000, 56145052510000, 56145083040000,
56145073590000, and 56146002540000, Cabarrus County. A Site Location Map is included as Figure 1,
and a Site Map is included as Figure 2.

Brownfields Property Area (acres): approximately 7.7 acres
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Not applicable
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Not applicable

COMMUNICATIONS

A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.

Prospective Developer (PD): City of Kannapolis
Contact Person: c/o Ms. Mary Katherine Stukes (Parker Poe)
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-335-9495 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: [e-mail]

Contractor for PD: Barton Malow
Contact Person: Ms. Haley Hassler, Pre-Construction Manager
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-817-8690 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: [e-mail]

Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC
Contact Person: Mr. Shannon Cottrill
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-586-0007 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Brownfields Program Project Manager: Mr. William Schmithorst, P.G.
Phone Numbers: Office: 919-707-8159 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: [e-mail]

4
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch – Collin Day, Ph. (336) 776-79675, [e-mail];
Water Quality Regional Operations Section – Corey Basinger, Ph. [phone],
[e-mail].

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:

On-site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior ☒

Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior ☒

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours ☒

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours ☒

Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior ☒

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days ☒

REDEVELOPMENT PLANS

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☒Residential ☒Recreational ☐Institutional ☒Commercial ☒Office ☒Retail ☐Industrial
☒Other specify:
Redevelop plans include the construction of a minor league baseball stadium in the western
portion of the Site and mixed used commercial/retail buildings in the eastern and southeastern
portion of the Site. One level of subgrade parking is anticipated below the mixed used
commercial/retail buildings and residential apartments are planned to be constructed above the
mixed used commercial/retail building spaces.

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth-moving activities
at the site:
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
☐ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility

5
EMP Version 2, June 2018
lines, etc.
☒ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors

3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
The Site consists of five parcels of land (Parcel Nos. 56135999040000, 56145052510000,
56145083040000, 56145073590000, and 56146002540000) in Kannapolis, Cabarrus County, that
total approximately 7.7 acres. The Site is currently developed with an asphalt/gravel covered
parking lot and two primarily vacant retail buildings. A commercial building (former K-Town
Furniture) in the southwestern portion of the Site was recently demolished. The Site is bisected
by Wellness Way/W. A Street and Oak Avenue.

Parcel 56145073590000 and a portion of parcel 56145083040000 currently are subject to a
brownfields agreement entered into by Castle & Cooke North Carolina, LLC for an adjacent
property (NCBP #0929-05-13) (the “Research Campus Brownfields Agreement”). This area is
generally referred to in the Research Campus Brownfields Agreement as the “water vault” area.

Current redevelopment plans include removal of asphalt and gravel surfaces from the parking
lot; City street closures and removal of asphalt/concrete surfacing; decommissioning/relocation
of utilities beneath Wellness Way/W. A Street and Oak Avenue; building demolition and removal
of concrete foundations in the eastern and southeastern portions of the Site; grading the Site;
construction of a minor league baseball stadium and associated walkways and entrances in the
western portion of the Site; and construction of one level of subgrade parking beneath two
mixed use commercial/retail buildings in the eastern and southeastern portion of the Site.
Residential apartments are planned to be constructed above the mixed use commercial/retail
spaces. The proposed Site layout and grading plans for the baseball stadium portion of the
project are included as Appendix A.

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.

5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.

6
EMP Version 2, June 2018

6) Which category of risk-based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
☒ Residential ☐ Non-Residential or Industrial/Commercial

7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 7/16/2018

b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
Site grading is scheduled to begin for baseball stadium in mid July 2018. The stadium
building foundations are anticipated to be constructed in December 2018, and construction
completion is anticipated in March 2020. Demolition of the existing buildings in the eastern
and southeastern portion of the Site are anticipated to begin in October 2018. Grading
activities are anticipated to begin immediately following demolition of the existing buildings
in the eastern and southeastern portions of the Site. A copy of the most current
redevelopment schedule is included as Appendix B.

c) Additional phases planned? ☐ Yes ☐ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.

d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 3/1/2020

CONTAMINATED MEDIA

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil:……………………………………….……………. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater:.……………………….……..……. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water:.……………...……..…………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment:.……………...……..…………………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor:…..…………...……..…………………. ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Suspected

7
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Part 6. Sub-Slab Soil Vapor:……...……..…………….. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air:...……..…………………………………. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.

PART 1. Soil – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.

1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
In January and March 2018, H&H advanced 32 soil borings to depths of up to 30 feet below
ground surface (bgs) at the Site. Seventeen soil borings were advanced within the footprint of
the proposed baseball stadium (SB-1 though SB-12 and B-1 through B-5) and 15 soil borings (SB
13 through SB-26) were advanced in the eastern and southeastern portions of Site in the vicinity
of the proposed subgrade parking and/or commercial/retail building areas. Sample locations are
shown on the attached Figure 1, and the sample analytical methods are shown in Table 1.
Laboratory analytical results of the soil samples indicate the presence of benzo[a]pyrene above
the Inactive Hazardous Site Branch (IHSB) Residential and Industrial/Commercial Preliminary Soil
Remedial Goals (PSRGs) in soil samples B-1 (0-2 ft) and B-1 (6-8 ft). Benzo[a]pyrene was
detected above the IHSB Residential PSRG in soil samples SB-17 (3-3.5 ft), SB-21 (0.5-1.5 ft), B-3
(0-2 ft), and B-4 (11-13 ft). Benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, and indeno[1,2,3-
cd]pyrene were detected above their IHSB Residential PSRGs in soil samples B-1 (0-2 ft) and B-1
(6-8 ft). Dibenz[a,h]anthracene was detected in soil sample B-1 (6-8 ft) above the IHSB
Residential PSRG. Hexavalent chromium was detected above the IHSB Residential PSRG in soil
sample SB-21 (0.5-1.5 ft). With the exception of naturally occurring metals (i.e., arsenic), no
other compounds were detected above the Industrial/Commercial or Residential PSRGs.
However, several other compounds [including tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in SB-2 (2-4 ft) and SB-9
(2-4 ft), benzo[a]anthracene in SB-17 (3-3.5 ft), and selenium in SB-13 through SB-26 (at depths
ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 ft bgs] were detected above their respective IHSB Protection of
Groundwater (POG) PSRGs. A summary of the soil analytical data is provided as Table 1.

2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Laboratory analytical results of the soil samples indicate the presence of benzo[a]pyrene above
the IHSB Industrial/Commercial Preliminary PSRG in soil samples B-1 (0-2 ft) and B-1 (6-8 ft).
Benzo[a]pyrene was detected above the IHSB Residential PSRG in soil samples SB-17 (3-3.5 ft),
SB-21 (0.5-1.5 ft), B-3 (0-2 ft), and B-4 (11-13 ft). Benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[b]fluoranthene,
and indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene were detected above their respective IHSB Residential PSRGs in soil
samples B-1 (0-2 ft) and B-1 (6-8 ft). Dibenz[a,h]anthracene was detected in soil sample B-1 (6-8
ft) above the IHSB Residential PSRG. Hexavalent chromium was detected above the IHSB
Residential PSRG in soil sample SB-21 (0.5-1.5 ft). With the exception of naturally occurring

8
EMP Version 2, June 2018
metals (i.e., arsenic), no other compounds were detected above the Industrial/Commercial or
Residential PSRGs.

3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
In order to achieve the desired grade for the baseball stadium portion of the project, the western
portion of the Site (approximately 6.39 acres or 278,723 thousand square ft) will be graded.
Grading activities will be conducted utilizing grading equipment (i.e., backhoes, front end
loaders, excavators, bull dozers, etc.) and the Site development contractor will implement best
management practices (i.e., implementation of silt fencing and berming) to manage soil on-site
during redevelopment activities. A grading plan and cut and fill maps for the baseball stadium
portion of the Site are included as Appendix A. A grading plan for the proposed mix use
commercial buildings in the eastern and southern portions of the Site is not yet available. Once
that plan is available, an addendum to this EMP may be needed.

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
Approximately 5 to 13 ft of soil will be excavated to construct the field of the baseball stadium in
the western portion of the Site. Near the completion of site grading activities, the stormwater
retention pond will be filled during site grading activities for the purpose of achieving the desired
level grade.

5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
Based upon the grading plans, it is anticipated that approximately 25,200 net cubic yards of soil
will be excavated on-site to achieve the desired grade for the baseball park. This volume
includes approximately 10 ft of soil that was excavated in December 2017 and January 2018 to
construct a stormwater retention pond in the southwest portion of the Site in accordance with
the Site’s approved Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. Soil excavated from the stormwater
retention pond area was stockpiled on an asphalt-covered surface in the western portion of the
Site. Soil stockpile analytical results indicate concentrations of benzo[a]anthracene,
benzo[a]pyrene, and dibenz[a,h]anthracene above IHSB Residential PSRGs and concentrations of
PCE, naphthalene, p-isopropyltoluene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, and 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene
above the IHSB POG PSRGs. With the exception of naturally occurring metals (i.e., arsenic), no
other compounds were detected above the Industrial/Commercial, Residential, or POG PSRGs.
The stockpiled soil was covered with plastic sheeting. A summary of the soil stockpile analytical
data is included as Table 2.

The covered soil stockpiles remain on-site and none of the soil disturbed as the result of grading
activities has been exported from the Site. The covered soil stockpile is estimated to contain
approximately 4,300 cubic yards.

Thus, the total volume of soil which is anticipated to be excavated and exported from the Site is
25,200 net cubic yards of soil.

9
EMP Version 2, June 2018
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
Based upon previous soil assessment data, approximately 10,300 cubic yards of impacted soil is
estimated to be present on-site which will be excavated during redevelopment activities for the
baseball stadium. This volume includes approximately 6,000 cubic yards of impacted soil in the
vicinity of soil boring B-1 adjacent to the former water vault where average cuts are anticipated
to be approximately 8 ft and the approximate 4,300 cubic yards of impacted soil which is
stockpiled on the western portion of the Site. A grading plan and cut and fill maps are not yet
available for the proposed mixed used commercial/retail buildings in the eastern and
southeastern portions of the Site. Once that plan is available, an addendum to this EMP may be
needed.

7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
It is anticipated that approximately 10,300 cubic yards of impacted soil will be disposed of off-
site. Any soil sent off-site will be disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations.

Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ☐Yes ☒No
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained-Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained-In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes ☐ No

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED-OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED-IN POLICY THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes ☒ No
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
☐ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.

10
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ If no, explain rationale:
Laboratory analysis of soil samples collected during assessment activities did not
identify compound concentrations at characteristically hazardous levels or levels
capable of exceeding TCLP criteria using the Rule of 20. If soils are disturbed
during grading which are suspected to contain concentrations above hazardous
waste levels [based on visual observation or field screening with a properly
calibrated photoionization detector (PID)], they will be sampled and properly
disposed off-site in accordance with applicable regulations.

d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
☒ Preliminary Health-Based Residential SRGs
☐ Preliminary Health-Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
☐ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
☐ Site-specific risk-based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Click or tap here to enter text.

Additional comments:
Click or tap here to enter text.

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known
☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.

11
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Provide description of material:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☒
☒ Describe cap or fill:
Soils above IHSB Residential PSRGs will either be placed under an impervious cap (i.e.,
building foundations, concrete pavement, etc.), capped with a 2 ft layer of clean fill, or will
be transported off-site for proper disposal.

☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-recorded if
actions are Post-Recordation).
☐ GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
☐ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:

4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
☒ Yes, describe the method will include:
Significant areas of contaminated soil are not expected to be encountered or disturbed
during future Site redevelopment activities based upon previous soil sampling data and field
screening during previous assessment activities. However, if suspected impacted soil is
encountered, the soil will be segregated and covered with plastic sheeting to control dust
and stormwater erosion. During excavation of the impacted soil, the contractor will
implement dust control measures such as using a water mist to mitigate dust generation, as
needed.

☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Field Screening of site soil
☒ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
During soil disturbance at the Site, the workers or contractors will observe soils for
evidence of potential significantly impacted soil that may not be suitable to leave in place
in exposed areas at a residential use site. Evidence of potential significant impacted soil
includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of
concern (i.e., chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be noted during Site work,
the contractor will contact the project environmental consultant to observe the suspect
condition. The environmental professional, under direct oversight by a NC licensed
engineer or geologist, will use a properly calibrated PID or other suitable equipment, to
screen soils for suspected contaminants. If the project environmental consultant confirms
that the material may be impacted, then the procedures below will be implemented. In
Click or tap here to enter text.

12
EMP Version 2, June 2018
addition, the environmental consultant will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager
within two business days to advise that person of the condition.

☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Soil Sample Collection
☒ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in-situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
Collection of additional soil samples is not anticipated based on results of previous Site
assessment activities. If significant soil impact is encountered during grading and/or
installation or removal of utilities, excavation will proceed only as far as needed to allow
grading and/or construction of the utility to continue and/or only as far as needed to
allow alternative corrective measures as described in the Contingency Plan (See
Contingency Plan Section – Part 9 below).

☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.

If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, selenium, and silver by EPA Method 6010 or 6020, and mercury by EPA Method 7471
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7196A or 7199A

☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:
A covered soil stockpile was already generated as described above. The stockpiled soil was placed on
an asphalt-paved surface and covered with plastic to preclude contact with surface water. The

13
EMP Version 2, June 2018

☒ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, selenium, and silver by EPA Method 6010 or 6020, and mercury by EPA Method 7471
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7196A or 7199A

Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, a work plan for
final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
Final grade soil sampling will be conducted for the Brownfields Property which is not
covered by an impervious surface. A work plan for final grade sampling will be submitted
under separate cover.

☐ If final grade sampling was NOT selected please explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Part 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL

NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner.”

Requirements for importing fill:
stockpiled soil area was bermed and silt fence was installed around the stockpile to prevent potential
runoff.

14
EMP Version 2, June 2018

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown

2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
Click or tap here to enter text.

3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range
of depths, please list the range.)
Click or tap here to enter text.

4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
Click or tap here to enter text.

5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use at the Brownfields property.
Click or tap here to enter text.

6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, selenium, and silver by EPA Method 6010 or 6020, and mercury by EPA Method 7471
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7196A or 7199A

7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in-situ
borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought
onto the Brownfields Property.
Import soil is not anticipated to be needed to achieve desired grade. However, if import fill is
needed, and is sourced from a pre-approved Brownfields import site, sampling will not be
required. If import soil is sourced from a borrow site not pre-approved by DEQ, it will be sampled
at a rate of 1 sample per 1,000 cubic yards. Samples collected from sources not pre-approved by
the Brownfields Program will be sampled using the analytical methods selected above.

15
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.

1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.
Based upon the grading plans, it is anticipated that approximately 25,000 net cubic yards of soil
will be excavated/exported from the Site to achieve the desired grade for the baseball park.
This volume includes approximately 20,700 cubic yards which will be excavated from within the
central portion of the footprint of the stadium where additional cuts are proposed to achieve
the desired grade and approximately 4,300 cubic yards of stockpile soil which was excavated
from the southwest portion of the site in December 2017 and January 2018 during construction
of the stormwater retention pond. The excavated soil is proposed to be exported to the
adjacent former Pillowtex Plant 1 Brownfields property (NCBP #09029-05-13) for use as fill in a
former sediment basin.

2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
☐ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
☐ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting Landfill;
☐ Landfarm or other treatment facility
☒ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property – determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and that a record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
☐ Use as Beneficial Fill off-site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.

16
EMP Version 2, June 2018
3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).
The export fill from the Site is proposed to be transported to the adjacent former Pillowtex
Plant 1 Brownfields Property (NCBP #09029-05-13) for use as fill in a former sediment basin
located on the northern portion of the property. The former sediment basin is located less than
a half a mile from the Site. The export fill is proposed to be transported to the former sediment
basin using covered dump trucks. The export fill would be placed and compacted in 1 to 2 foot
increments (i.e., lifts) in the former sediment basin. The export fill soil containing impacts
above IHSB industrial PSRGs will not be placed within the top 2 ft fill in the sediment basin. A
copy of the approved Erosion Control Plan and grading plan for placement of the export fill soil
is included as Appendix C. A copy of the agreement between the City of Kannapolis and the
owner of the adjacent former Pillowtex Plant 1 Brownfields Property for acceptance of the
export fill from the Site is included in Appendix C.

The soil impacts at the Site are similar in nature and concentration to soil impacts documented
at the former Pillowtex Plant 1 Brownfields Property. For example, PAHs including
benzo[a]pyrene at concentrations up to 0.69 mg/kg and arsenic up to 8.1 mg/kg have been
documented on the receiving former Pillowtex Plant 1 Brownfields Property (See former
Pillowtex Plant 1 Brownfields Agreement and referenced Environmental Reports therein).

A soil characterization work plan for the collection and analyses of soil samples from the
proposed excavation area has been submitted under separate cover.

Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES

☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)

☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original
depth from which it was excavated.

☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials:
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ If no, include rationale here:
High-performance polypropylene (HP Storm), reinforced concrete pipe (RCP), and/or high-
density polyethylene (HDPE) are proposed to be used at the stadium project. The HP pipe has a
dual wall with a smooth interior. The pipe joints have a watertight gasketed integral bell and

17
EMP Version 2, June 2018
spigot joint.

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Although not anticipated, in the event contaminated soil and/or vapors are encountered in utility
trenches during redevelopment activities, the trench will be evacuated and appropriate safety
screening of the vapors will be performed to protect workers. If results indicate further action is
warranted in response to vapors to protect workers, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of
industrial fans/ventilation) will be implemented. Per EMP notification requirements, the NC
Brownfields project manager will be notified within 48 hours of discovery of previously unknown
contamination.

PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below.

1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
Based on groundwater sampling activities conducted in January 2018, groundwater was
measured at depths ranging from approximately 15 to 24 ft below ground surface (bgs).

2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☒onsite ☐offsite ☐both or ☐unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
The locations of previous groundwater samples are shown on Figure 3. A summary of previous
groundwater data is provided in Table 4. As noted in H&H’s Phase II ESA and Brownfields
Assessment report, groundwater sampling activities conducted in January 2018 did not indicate
the presence of compounds in groundwater above the North Carolina Administrative Code
(NCAC) 15A 2L Groundwater Standards (2L Standards).

3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
Groundwater at the Site is expected to mimic topographic gradient and flow toward the
southwest toward an unnamed tributary of Irish Buffalo Creek.

4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
☐Yes ☒No
If yes, describe these activities:
Encountering groundwater during future redevelopment of the Site is not anticipated.

Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered
during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent
management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or
sampling procedures).
Although not anticipated, if suspected impacted groundwater is encountered during
redevelopment activities, groundwater samples will be collected to determine if impacts are
present. If collected, groundwater samples will be analyzed for VOCs and SVOCs. If the
analytical results do not indicate the presence of compounds above 2L Groundwater Standards,
then the groundwater will be discharged in accordance with standard construction practices. If

18
EMP Version 2, June 2018
the environmental professional determines that the excavation likely contains impacted
groundwater, then appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken to manage
groundwater than gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted
during construction activities. The accumulated water will be tested and disposed off-site (if
impacted), tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ surface water
standards) per 2H.0106, or used for dust control at the Site with prior approval from NC
Brownfields project manager if impacted). Discharge to the storm sewer will be in accordance
with the Site’s sediment and erosion control plan. In addition, the environmental professional
will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within 48 hours regarding the condition.

5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☐Yes ☒No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes ☐No

6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
☒ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program’s intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
☐ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
☐ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
☒ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.

7) Please provide additional details as needed:

Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.

PART 3. SURFACE WATER -Please fill out the information below.
1) Is surface water present at the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes ☒ No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No
Click or tap here to enter text.

19
EMP Version 2, June 2018
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
If surface water run-off gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted
during construction activities, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken. The
accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate, tested and disposed off-site (if impacted), or
tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ surface water standards).
It may also be used on-site for dust control with prior approval of NC Brownfields project
manager if impacted.

PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below.

1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No

2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☐ No

3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No

4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.

5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
No contaminated sediment has been identified during previous site assessment activities. No
surface water bodies (with the exception of the stormwater retention pond) are present on-site.

PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below.
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
Groundwater:.….☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
Groundwater:…..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?

20
EMP Version 2, June 2018

4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities
(trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management
of such contact:
In the unlikely event contaminated soil vapors are encountered during future redevelopment
activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be
performed. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such
as the use of industrial fans or local exhaust) will be implemented. Soil vapor sampling will be
conducted in the areas of the former dry cleaners (former Wrenn’s Cleaner and Star Cleaners) in
the locations of the existing buildings (and proposed new buildings) in the eastern and
southeastern portions of the Site. The proposed soil vapor sampling work plan will be submitted
under separate cover for prior approval by the NC Brownfields Program.

PART 6. SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.
1) Are sub-slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) If data indicate that sub-slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map
showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub-slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☐0-6 inches ☒Other, please
describe:
No sub-slab vapor samples have been collected at the Site.

4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub-slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
In the unlikely event soil vapors are encountered during future redevelopment activities, worker
breathing zones will be monitored using a calibrated PID. If results indicate further action is
warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as the use of industrial fans or local exhaust)
will be implemented. The NC Brownfields project manager will be notified per EMP
requirements for discovery of unknown contamination.

PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below.

1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
Click or tap here to enter text.

21
EMP Version 2, June 2018
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk-based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:

VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM – Please fill out the information below.
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☐ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
Click or tap here to enter text.

VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer

If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
Because groundwater impacts above 2L Standard have not been identified on the Site, a vapor
intrusion mitigation system is not being proposed for the property at this time. If the results of
the proposed soil vapor sampling assessment indicate a vapor intrusion risk is present in the
eastern and southeastern portions of the Site, an addendum to the EMP may be needed.

CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials

In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
In the unlikely event there is evidence of potential indoor air issues (i.e., unusual or offensive odors)
during future redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of
the indoor air will be performed. If warranted, safety screening procedures will include periodical
screening of indoor air for volatile organic vapors with a calibrated PID when workers present in the
lower level of the building(s) identify potential indoor air issues. If the results indicate further action
is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as the use of industrial fans or local exhaust) will
be implemented. The NC Brownfields project manager will be notified per EMP requirements for
discovery of unknown contamination.

22
EMP Version 2, June 2018
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site-specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
Arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, selenium, and silver by EPA Method 6010
or 6020, and mercury by EPA Method 7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7196A or 7199A

Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
In January and March 2018, H&H conducted Phase II ESA and Brownfields soil assessment activities
at the Site. The results of the assessment activities indicate the presence of arsenic and PAHs above
the IHSB Residential and Industrial/Commercial PSRGs and hexavalent chromium above the IHSB
Residential PSRGs. No other compounds were detected above the Residential or
Industrial/Commercial PSRGs. Because cuts are anticipated in the area of known soil impacts above
the IHSB Residential and Commercial/Industrial PSRGs, the impacted soil will require proper off-site
management during redevelopment activities.

Although it is not anticipated that soil impacts will be encountered in other areas during
construction activities, contractors may encounter unknown sub-surface environmental conditions
that, if encountered, will require proper management. In the event that such conditions are
encountered during Site redevelopment activities, the environmental actions noted below will be
used to direct environmental responses.

1. During soil disturbance at the Site, the workers or contractors will observe soils for evidence of

23
EMP Version 2, June 2018
impacted soil that may not be suitable to leave in place in exposed areas at a residential use
site. Evidence of potential impacted soil includes a distinct color, discoloration, strong odor,
and/or observance of previously disposed materials of concern (i.e., chemicals, tanks, drums,
etc.). Should any of the above be noted during Site work, the contractor will contact the project
environmental professional to observe the suspect condition. If the environmental professional
confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures below will be implemented.
In addition, the environmental professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager
within 48 hours of discovery to advise that person of the condition. In addition, H&H will visit
the construction Site to check for environmental concerns multiple times during Site work.
Based on the results of laboratory analyses and specific operations planned in the vicinity of the
environmental impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Program will be notified and additional sampling
may be required.
2. If significant soil impact is encountered during grading and/or installation or removal of utilities,
excavation will proceed only as far as needed to allow grading and/or construction of the utility
to continue.
3. Suspect significantly impacted soil (i.e., does not appear to be associated with prior known soil
contamination) excavated during grading and/or utility line installation or removal may be
stockpiled and covered in a secure area on-site to allow construction to progress. Suspected
impacted soil will be underlain by and covered with minimum 10-mil plastic sheeting. At least
one representative sample of the soil will be collected per 800 cubic yards of stockpiled soil for
analysis of total VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals (including speciation for chromium). If the
results of analysis of the sample indicate that the soil could potentially exceed characteristically,
hazardous waste criteria, then the soil will also be submitted for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedure (TCLP) analyses for appropriate compounds. Impacted soil will be managed in
accordance with Paragraph 4 below.
4. Soil sampled in accordance with Paragraph 3 of this section will be handled in the manner
described below based upon the laboratory analyses:
i. If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed the DEQ IHSB
Residential PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts
or which are consistent with background levels identified by Hart & Hickman for metals)
and the TCLP concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil may be
used on-site as fill without conditions.
ii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the DEQ IHSB Residential
PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which
are consistent with background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations are
below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil, with DEQ’s written approval, may be used
on-site as fill below a hardscape surface or beneath at least 2 ft of compacted clean soil.
iii. Impacted soil may be transported to a permitted facility such as a landfill after the soil is
profiled and accepted at the disposal facility. In the unlikely event that the composite
sample data indicates concentrations above TCLP hazardous waste criteria, then the soil
must be pre-treated on-site and/or transported off-site to a permitted disposal facility
that can accept or treat hazardous waste. Copies of waste manifests will be provided to

24
EMP Version 2, June 2018
the DEQ Brownfields Program.

Sampling data for potential impacted soil and the disposition of impacted soil will be provided
to DEQ if and when the data becomes available.
5. If determined to be warranted, confirmation samples will be used to determine the
appropriate corrective measure for soil beyond the excavation limits required for grading
and/or utility line installation or removal. Such corrective measures are specified in the items
below.
6. If surface water run-off gathers in an open excavation determined during construction that
appears to be impacted, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken. The
accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate, be tested and disposed off-site (if impacted),
or be tested and discharged as typical construction stormwater (if not impacted above DEQ
surface water standards) in accordance with applicable regulations.
7. In the event that soil within an excavation cannot be dried adequately for construction purposes
using the methods described above, the soil may be amended with clean soil, aggregate, inert
drying agents, and/or stabilizing agents to achieve the desired geotechnical qualities.

Underground Storage Tanks:
In the event that impacts associated with a UST release are found to be present on the Site, they
will be addressed through the Brownfields Program. However, the methods used to remove the
UST will be consistent with Section 5.2 of the NC DEQ UST Section Guidelines for Site Checks, Tank
Closure, and Initial Response and Abatement for UST Releases.

Sub-Grade Feature/Pit:
If a sub-grade feature or pit is encountered and does not require removal for geotechnical or
construction purposes, it will be filled with soil or suitable fill and construction will proceed. Where
appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before back filling to prevent fluid accumulation. If the
pit has waste in it, the waste may be set aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste
disposal purposes for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, and TCLP RCRA metals and disposed off-site at a
permitted facility in accordance with applicable regulations, or the waste will be managed in
accordance with Paragraph 3 above, whichever is most applicable based on the type of waste
present. If the pit must be removed and the observed waste characteristics indicate the concrete
may potentially be contaminated to a significant degree, the concrete will be sampled and analyzed
by methods specified by the disposal facility.

If buried piping is encountered and must be removed to allow construction to proceed, the
contractor will inspect the pipe for fluids, collect the fluids where appropriate, and look for signs of
a release using field methods. The collected fluids will be sampled for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA
metals to determine appropriate disposition of the fluid.

Buried Waste Material:

25
EMP Version 2, June 2018
If excavation into buried wastes or significantly impacted soil occurs, the contractor is instructed to
stop work in that location and notify the environmental consultant. The environmental consultant
will observe the materials and collected samples if warranted. In this event, confirmation sampling
will be conducted at representative locations in the base and sidewalls of the excavation after the
waste or significantly impacted soil is removed. The confirmation samples will be analyzed for
VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals (including speciation for chromium). Areas of suspected
contaminated soil that remain at the Site after excavation is complete above the DEQ IHSB
Residential PSRGs will be managed pursuant to this plan and incorporated into the Brownfields plat.
Disturbed buried wastes will be sampled for waste characterization purposes and disposed off-site
at a permitted facility in accordance with applicable regulations. Copies of waste manifests will be
provided to the DEQ Brownfields Program.

If determined to be warranted, confirmation samples will be used to determine the appropriate
corrective measure for soil beyond the excavation limits required for grading and/or utility line
installation or removal. Such corrective measures are specified in the items below.

Re-Use of Impacted Soils On-Site:
See Paragraph 4 of this section above.

If unknown, impacted soil is identified on-site, management on-site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on-site.

If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
Click or tap here to enter text.

POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING

☒ Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 1/31/2019

The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment-related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:

26
EMP Version 2, June 2018
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).

☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement.

28
EMP Version 2, June 2018

29
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Table 1 (Page 1 of 2)
Summary of Phase II ESA and Brownfields Soil Analytical Data
Proposed Baseball Stadium
Kannapolis, North CarolinaH&H Job No. KAN-012
Location
Petroleum
Impacted Soil
Identified During Grading
Sample ID SB-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 SB-5 SB-6 SB-7 SB-8 SB-9 SB-10 SB-11 SB-12 SB-13 SB-14 SB-15 SB-16 SB-17 SB-18 SB-18A SB-18A (DUP-1)
Date 01/26/18 01/26/18 01/22/18 01/22/18 01/23/18 01/26/18 01/23/18 01/26/18 01/23/18 01/23/18 01/23/18 01/22/18 3/27/2018 3/27/2018 3/27/2018 3/27/2018 3/27/2018 3/27/2018 3/27/2018 3/27/2018
Depth (ft)2-4 2-4 12-15 14-16 4-6 2-4 4-6 2-4 2-4 4-6 0-2 8-10 3-3.5 3-3.5 3-3.5 3-3.5 3-3.5 2-2.5 3-3.5 3-3.5
VOCs (8260B)
Acetone --25 12,000 140,000 ----<0.0532 <0.0450 NA NA <0.0498 <0.0595 <0.0531 <0.0588 <0.0618 NA NA <0.0511 0.021 0.023 0.024 0.020 J 0.020 J 0.013 J 0.024 0.033
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene --0.41 31 470 ----<0.00213 0.0209 NA NA <0.00199 <0.00238 <0.00213 <0.00235 <0.00247 NA NA <0.00204 <0.00023 <0.00024 <0.00023 <0.00024 <0.00024 <0.00023 <0.00024 <0.00028
Methyl Acetate --29 16,000 230,000 ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.00081 <0.00084 <0.00082 <0.00086 <0.00085 <0.00083 <0.00085 <0.00098
2-Butanone (MEK)--17 5,500 40,000 ----<0.0532 <0.0450 NA NA <0.0498 <0.0595 <0.0531 <0.0588 <0.0618 NA NA <0.0511 <0.00048 <0.00050 <0.00049 <0.00052 <0.00051 <0.00049 <0.00051 <0.00058
Tetrachloroethylene --0.0063 17 82 ----<0.00213 0.0719 NA NA <0.00199 <0.00238 <0.00213 <0.00235 0.0203 NA NA 0.00353 <0.00025 <0.00026 <0.00026 <0.00027 <0.00027 <0.00026 <0.00027 <0.00031
Trichloroethylene --0.021 0.87 4.0 ----<0.00213 0.00202 NA NA <0.00199 <0.00238 <0.00213 <0.00235 <0.00247 NA NA <0.00204 <0.00035 <0.00036 <0.00035 <0.00037 <0.00036 <0.00035 <0.00037 <0.00042
PAHs/SVOCs (8270D)
Acenaphtylene --41 NE NE ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0781 <0.0890 <0.0738 <0.053 <0.054 <0.051 <0.054 <0.053 <0.052 <0.055 <0.055
Anthracene --1,300 3,600 45,000 ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0781 <0.0890 <0.0738 <0.059 <0.060 <0.060 <0.061 0.20 J <0.058 <0.061 <0.061
Benzo[a]anthracene --0.35 1.1 21 ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0781 <0.0890 <0.0738 <0.048 <0.049 <0.049 <0.049 0.47 <0.047 <0.049 <0.049
Benzo[a]pyrene --0.12 0.11 2.1 ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0781 <0.0890 <0.0738 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.041 0.31 J <0.039 <0.041 <0.041
Benzo[b]fluoranthene --1.2 1.1 21 ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0781 <0.0890 <0.0738 <0.043 <0.043 <0.043 <0.044 0.42 <0.041 <0.044 <0.044
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene --15,600 NE NE ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0781 <0.0890 <0.0738 <0.040 <0.041 <0.041 <0.041 0.17 J <0.039 <0.041 <0.041
Benzo[k]fluoranthene --12 11 210 ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0781 <0.0890 <0.0738 <0.043 <0.049 <0.049 <0.049 0.13 J <0.047 <0.049 <0.050
Chrysene --36 110 2,100 ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0781 <0.0890 <0.0738 <0.046 <0.047 <0.047 <0.047 0.40 <0.045 <0.047 <0.048
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene --0.38 0.11 2.1 ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0781 <0.0890 <0.0738 <0.045 <0.045 <0.045 <0.046 <0.045 <0.043 <0.046 <0.046
Fluoranthene --670 480 6,000 ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0781 <0.0890 <0.0738 <0.047 <0.047 <0.047 <0.048 0.86 <0.046 <0.048 <0.048
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene --3.9 1.1 21 ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0781 <0.0890 <0.0738 <0.042 <0.043 <0.043 <0.043 0.20 J <0.041 <0.043 <0.043
Phenanthrene --134 NE NE ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0781 <0.0890 <0.0738 <0.048 <0.048 <0.048 <0.049 1.1 <0.046 <0.049 <0.049
Pyrene --440 360 4,500 ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.0781 <0.0890 <0.0738 <0.049 <0.049 <0.049 <0.050 0.85 <0.047 <0.050 <0.050
VPH (MADEP)------------NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA All BRL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
EPH (MADEP)------------NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA All BRL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
TPH-DRO (8015C)100 ----------<5.69 25.1 NA NA <5.74 <5.90 <5.94 <6.07 <6.02 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
TPH-GRO (8015C)50 ----------<6.17 <6.62 22.4 <6.01 <5.63 <6.30 <7.16 <6.59 <5.68 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
RCRA Metals (6010D/6020B/7471B)
and Hexavalent Chromium (7196A)Range Average
Arsenic --5.8 0.68 3.0 1 - 18 4.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1.6 J 1.7 1.9 1.4 J 1.5 J 1.3 J 1.3 J 1.4 J
Barium --580 3,100 47,000 50 - 1,000 356 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 160 140 150 140 110 100 110 100
Cadmium --3.0 14 200 1 - 10 (5)4.3 (5)NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.021 0.023 J 0.026 J <0.022 <0.021 <0.020 <0.022 <0.022
Chromium --3.8 0.31 6.5 7 - 300 65 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 11 15 20 11 16 11 8.7 8.9
Hexavalent Chromium --3.8 0.31 6.5 ----NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.15 <0.14 <0.15 <0.15
Trivalent Chromium --360,000 23,000 100,000 ----11 15 20 11 16 11 8.7 8.9
Lead --270 400 (4)800 (4)ND - 50 16 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 26 30 31 25 37 22 21 25
Mercury --1.0 2.3 9.7 0.03 - 0.52 0.121 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.0092 J 0.019 J 0.0052 J <0.0022 0.031 <0.0021 0.023 0.031
Selenium --2.1 78 1,200 0.1-0.8 0.42 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.0 3.1 2.5 2.3 2.3
PCBs (8082A)------------NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Notes:
1) NC DEQ Action Limits for Total 2) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (October 2017).3) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils obtained from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005.4) Values shown are based on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) (November 2017).
5) Southeastern U.S.A. values are shown, as North Carolina background levels are not specified.
Bold indicates concentration exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.Bold indicates concentration exceeds the Residential Use PSRG.Bold and highlighted values exceed the Industrial/Commercial PSRG.Concentrations reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
Method number follows parameter in parenthesis
VOCs = volatile organic compoundsSVOCs = semi-VOCsPAHs = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsVPH = volatile petroleum hydrocarbonsEPH = extractable petroleum hydrocarbons
TPH-DRO = diesel-range total petroleum hydrocarbons
TPH-GRO = gasoline-range total petroleum hydrocarbonsMADEP = Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BRL = below reporting limitNA = not analyzed, -- = not applicable
All Below Method Detection Limits
Former Goodyear Service GarageTimber Pilings
Former Bob's
Laundry/Puritan
Laundry and Cleaners
Former Gas Station Former Automotive Repair Shops
DEQ UST Section
Action Levels (1)
DEQ IHSB Protection of
Groundwater PSRGs (2)
DEQ IHSB
Residential Use
PSRGs (2)
DEQ IHSB Industrial/Commercial
PSRGs (2)North Carolina
Background Levels (3)
S:\AAA-Master Projects\City of Kannapolis - KAN\KAN-012 Infrastructure, Streetscape, & Baseball Projects\EMP\Data Tables 7-16-187/16/2018
Table 1 (Page 1 of 2)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1 (Page 2 of 2)
Summary of Phase II ESA and Brownfields Soil Analytical Data
Proposed Baseball Stadium
Kannapolis, North CarolinaH&H Job No. KAN-012
Location
Sample ID
Date
Depth (ft)
VOCs (8260B)
Acetone --25 12,000 140,000 ----
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene --0.41 31 470 ----
Methyl Acetate --29 16,000 230,000 ----
2-Butanone (MEK)--17 5,500 40,000 ----
Tetrachloroethylene --0.0063 17 82 ----
Trichloroethylene --0.021 0.87 4.0 ----
PAHs/SVOCs (8270D)
Acenaphtylene --41 NE NE ----
Anthracene --1,300 3,600 45,000 ----
Benzo[a]anthracene --0.35 1.1 21 ----
Benzo[a]pyrene --0.12 0.11 2.1 ----
Benzo[b]fluoranthene --1.2 1.1 21 ----
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene --15,600 NE NE ----
Benzo[k]fluoranthene --12 11 210 ----
Chrysene --36 110 2,100 ----
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene --0.38 0.11 2.1 ----
Fluoranthene --670 480 6,000 ----
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene --3.9 1.1 21 ----
Phenanthrene --134 NE NE ----
Pyrene --440 360 4,500 ----
VPH (MADEP)------------
EPH (MADEP)------------
TPH-DRO (8015C)100 ----------
TPH-GRO (8015C)50 ----------
RCRA Metals (6010D/6020B/7471B)
and Hexavalent Chromium (7196A)Range Average
Arsenic --5.8 0.68 3.0 1 - 18 4.8
Barium --580 3,100 47,000 50 - 1,000 356
Cadmium --3.0 14 200 1 - 10 (5)4.3 (5)
Chromium --3.8 0.31 6.5 7 - 300 65
Hexavalent Chromium --3.8 0.31 6.5 ----
Trivalent Chromium --360,000 23,000 100,000 ----
Lead --270 400 (4)800 (4)ND - 50 16
Mercury --1.0 2.3 9.7 0.03 - 0.52 0.121
Selenium --2.1 78 1,200 0.1-0.8 0.42
PCBs (8082A)------------
Notes:
1) NC DEQ Action Limits for Total 2) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (October 2017).3) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils obtained from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005.4) Values shown are based on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) (November 2017).
5) Southeastern U.S.A. values are shown, as North Carolina background levels are not specified.
Bold indicates concentration exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.Bold indicates concentration exceeds the Residential Use PSRG.Bold and highlighted values exceed the Industrial/Commercial PSRG.Concentrations reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
Method number follows parameter in parenthesis
VOCs = volatile organic compoundsSVOCs = semi-VOCsPAHs = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsVPH = volatile petroleum hydrocarbonsEPH = extractable petroleum hydrocarbons
TPH-DRO = diesel-range total petroleum hydrocarbons
TPH-GRO = gasoline-range total petroleum hydrocarbonsMADEP = Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection BRL = below reporting limitNA = not analyzed, -- = not applicable
DEQ UST Section
Action Levels (1)
DEQ IHSB Protection of
Groundwater PSRGs (2)
DEQ IHSB
Residential Use
PSRGs (2)
DEQ IHSB Industrial/Commercial
PSRGs (2)North Carolina
Background Levels (3)
SB-19 SB-20 SB-21 SB-22 SB-23 SB-24 SB-25 SB-26
3/27/2018 3/27/2018 3/27/2018 3/27/2018 3/27/2018 3/27/2018 3/27/2018 3/27/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018
1-2 0.5-1.5 0.5-1.5 1-2 0.5-1.5 0.5-1.5 0.5-1.5 0.5-1.5 0-2 6-8 11-13 0-2 6-8 11-13 0-2 6-8 11-13 0-2 6-8 11-13 0-2 6-8 11-13
0.0053 J 0.013 J 0.029 0.016 J 0.027 0.024 0.042 0.027 <0.0452 <0.0545 <0.0489 <0.0526 <0.0544 <0.0590 <0.0523 <0.0538 <0.0481 <0.0476 <0.0454 <0.0510 <0.0519 <0.0479 <0.0430
<0.00025 <0.00022 <0.00024 <0.00024 <0.00021 <0.00021 <0.00024 <0.00023 <0.00181 <0.00218 <0.00196 <0.00210 <0.00218 <0.00236 <0.00209 <0.00215 <0.00193 <0.00190 <0.00182 <0.00204 <0.00208 <0.00191 <0.00172
<0.00088 <0.00078 <0.00086 <0.00086 <0.00074 0.017 <0.00087 <0.00083 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
<0.00053 <0.00047 <0.00051 <0.00052 <0.00045 0.0022 J <0.00052 <0.00050 <0.0452 <0.0545 <0.0489 <0.0526 <0.0544 <0.0590 <0.0523 <0.0538 <0.0481 <0.0476 <0.0454 <0.0510 <0.0519 <0.0479 <0.0430
<0.00028 <0.00025 <0.00027 <0.00027 <0.00023 <0.00024 <0.00027 <0.00026 <0.00181 <0.00218 <0.00196 <0.00210 <0.00218 <0.00236 <0.00209 <0.00215 <0.00193 <0.00190 <0.00182 <0.00204 <0.00208 <0.00191 <0.00172
<0.00038 <0.00034 <0.00037 <0.00037 <0.00032 <0.00033 <0.00037 <0.00035 <0.00181 <0.00218 <0.00196 <0.00210 <0.00218 <0.00236 <0.00209 <0.00215 <0.00193 <0.00190 <0.00182 <0.00204 <0.00208 <0.00191 <0.00172
<0.052 <0.059 <0.061 <0.058 <0.056 <0.057 <0.056 <0.056 0.420 0.510 <0.0778 <0.0759 <0.0850 <0.0842 <0.0718 <0.0870 <0.0843 <0.0750 <0.0754 <0.0781 <0.0861 <0.0792 <0.0785
<0.058 <0.065 0.11 J <0.065 <0.062 <0.064 <0.062 <0.063 0.566 1.08 <0.0778 <0.0759 <0.0850 <0.0842 <0.0718 <0.0870 <0.0843 <0.0750 <0.0754 <0.0781 <0.0861 <0.0792 <0.0785
<0.047 <0.053 0.30 J <0.053 <0.051 <0.052 <0.050 <0.051 2.22 3.17 <0.0778 <0.0759 <0.0850 <0.0842 0.130 <0.0870 <0.0843 0.0932 <0.0754 0.130 0.0905 <0.0792 <0.0785
<0.039 <0.044 0.21 J <0.044 <0.042 <0.043 <0.042 <0.042 2.59 3.85 <0.0778 <0.0759 <0.0850 <0.0842 0.148 <0.0870 <0.0843 0.100 <0.0754 0.157 0.0915 <0.0792 <0.0785
<0.042 <0.047 0.30 J <0.047 <0.045 <0.046 <0.045 <0.045 2.82 3.78 <0.0778 <0.0759 <0.0850 <0.0842 0.161 <0.0870 <0.0843 0.131 <0.0754 0.167 0.141 <0.0792 <0.0785
<0.039 <0.044 0.12 J <0.044 <0.042 <0.043 <0.042 <0.043 1.56 2.45 <0.0778 <0.0759 <0.0850 <0.0842 0.0847 <0.0870 <0.0843 <0.0750 <0.0754 0.0852 <0.0861 <0.0792 <0.0785
<0.047 <0.053 <0.055 <0.053 <0.051 <0.052 <0.051 <0.051 1.29 1.92 <0.0778 <0.0759 <0.0850 <0.0842 0.0868 <0.0870 <0.0843 <0.0750 <0.0754 <0.0781 <0.0861 <0.0792 <0.0785
<0.045 <0.051 0.27 J <0.051 <0.049 <0.050 <0.049 <0.049 1.97 3.03 <0.0778 <0.0759 <0.0850 <0.0842 0.134 <0.0870 <0.0843 <0.0750 <0.0754 0.126 <0.0861 <0.0792 <0.0785
<0.044 <0.049 <0.051 <0.049 <0.047 <0.048 <0.047 <0.047 <0.374 0.777 <0.0778 <0.0759 <0.0850 <0.0842 <0.0718 <0.0870 <0.0843 <0.0750 <0.0754 <0.0781 <0.0861 <0.0792 <0.0785
<0.046 <0.052 0.52 <0.051 <0.049 <0.051 <0.049 <0.049 5.46 11.5 <0.0778 <0.0759 <0.0850 <0.0842 0.240 <0.0870 <0.0843 0.151 0.0764 0.377 0.224 <0.0792 <0.0785
<0.041 <0.046 0.14 J <0.046 <0.044 <0.046 <0.044 <0.045 1.39 2.21 <0.0778 <0.0759 <0.0850 <0.0842 0.0744 <0.0870 <0.0843 <0.0750 <0.0754 <0.0781 <0.0861 <0.0792 <0.0785
<0.047 <0.053 0.47 <0.052 <0.050 <0.052 <0.050 <0.050 2.31 4.11 <0.0778 <0.0759 <0.0850 <0.0842 0.0962 <0.0870 <0.0843 <0.0750 <0.0754 0.221 0.126 <0.0792 <0.0785
<0.047 <0.054 0.49 <0.053 <0.051 <0.053 <0.051 <0.051 4.34 6.68 <0.0778 <0.0759 <0.0850 <0.0842 0.199 <0.0870 <0.0843 0.121 <0.0754 0.268 0.158 <0.0792 <0.0785
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1.4 J 2.2 2.8 2.2 1.5 J 1.7 J 1.8 2.5 3.55 2.91 2.77 2.71 2.95 4.09 3.40 3.18 3.71 3.62 4.47 4.67 5.20 3.08 2.87
330 260 110 320 94 98 130 150 119 105 32.7 113 85.3 296 99.7 96.8 183 102 186 173 315 98.0 63.4
<0.021 <0.023 <0.024 <0.023 <0.022 <0.023 0.026 J <0.022 <1.15 <1.14 <1.12 <1.13 <1.25 <1.26 <1.03 <1.26 <1.23 <1.06 <1.09 <1.12 <1.29 <1.18 <1.16
12 10 12 8.7 7.2 8.5 8.2 8.7 7.65 16.7 4.72 4.56 7.86 6.10 3.50 5.22 3.69 7.69 4.67 6.98 4.74 4.76 11
<0.14 <0.16 0.53 <0.16 0.17 J <0.16 <0.15 <0.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12 10 11.47 8.7 7.03 8.5 8.2 8.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
16 22 38 27 21 22 30 28 19.4 17.5 17.1 15.9 43.8 27.6 14.5 28.9 25.5 16.1 16.2 22.2 31.8 15.2 21.7
<0.021 0.0039 J 0.033 <0.0023 0.024 0.030 0.098 0.016 J <0.115 <0.114 <0.112 <0.115 0.193 <0.127 <0.108 <0.129 <0.123 <0.111 <0.116 <0.115 <0.128 <0.115 <0.119
3.9 7.4 3.0 5.6 3.0 2.9 3.2 5.0 <2.30 <2.29 <2.24 <2.26 <2.50 <2.52 <2.06 <2.52 <2.46 <2.13 <2.18 <2.24 <2.58 <2.37 <2.31
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
North Carolina Research Campus Brownfields Property (Northern Portion of the Site)
B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5
Former Star Cleaners Former Wrenn's Cleaners
S:\AAA-Master Projects\City of Kannapolis - KAN\KAN-012 Infrastructure, Streetscape, & Baseball Projects\EMP\Data Tables 7-16-187/16/2018
Table 1 (Page 2 of 2)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2
Summary of Soil Stockpile Analytical Data
Proposed Baseball Stadium
Kannapolis, North Carolina
H&H Job No. KAN-012
Date 1/31/2018 1/31/2018 1/31/2018 1/31/2018 1/31/2018 1/31/2018 1/31/2018 1/31/2018 1/31/2018 1/31/2018
VOCs (8260)
Isopropylbenzene --2.3 270 270 ----<0.00168 <0.00174 <0.00186 <0.00174 0.00779 <0.00224 <0.00194 <0.00174 <0.00188 <0.00194
Naphthalene --0.39 4.1 18 ----0.00678 <0.00434 <0.00465 <0.00436 1.08 0.00638 <0.00485 <0.00436 <0.00470 <0.00484
n-Butylbenzene --4.5 110 110 ----<0.00168 <0.00174 <0.00186 <0.00174 3.64 <0.00224 <0.00194 <0.00174 <0.00188 <0.00194
N-Propylbenzene --2.6 260 260 ----<0.00168 <0.00174 <0.00186 <0.00174 0.478 <0.00224 <0.00194 <0.00174 <0.00188 <0.00194
p-Isopropyltoluene --1.24 NE NE ----<0.00168 <0.00174 <0.00186 <0.00174 2.70 <0.00224 <0.00194 <0.00174 <0.00188 <0.00194
sec-Butylbenzene --4.1 150 150 ----<0.00168 <0.00174 <0.00186 <0.00174 1.54 <0.00224 <0.00194 <0.00174 <0.00188 <0.00194
tert-Butylbenzene --3.1 180 180 ----<0.00168 <0.00174 <0.00186 <0.00174 0.567 <0.00224 <0.00194 <0.00174 <0.00188 <0.00194
Tetrachloroethene --0.0063 17 82 ----0.0217 0.00532 0.0383 0.0113 0.00823 0.0833 0.0647 0.0210 0.00772 0.0983
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene --12 63 220 ----0.00183 <0.00174 <0.00186 <0.00174 11.7 <0.00224 <0.00194 <0.00174 <0.00188 <0.00194
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene --11 56 180 ----<0.00168 <0.00174 <0.00186 <0.00174 <0.00224 <0.00194 <0.00174 <0.00188 <0.00194
SVOCs (8270D)
Acenaphthene --16 720 9,000 ----<0.0790 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 0.274 <0.0839 <0.0810 <0.0728 <0.0812 <0.0820
Acenaphtylene --NE NE NE ----<0.0790 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 0.100 <0.0839 <0.0810 0.0813 <0.0812 <0.0820
Anthracene --1,300 3,600 45,000 ----<0.0790 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 0.290 <0.0839 <0.0810 <0.0728 <0.0812 <0.0820
Benzo[a]anthracene --0.35 1.1 21 ----<0.0790 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 1.95 <0.0839 <0.0810 <0.0728 <0.0812 <0.0820
Benzo[a]pyrene --0.12 0.11 2.1 ----<0.0790 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 0.660 <0.0839 <0.0810 0.0767 <0.0812 <0.0820
Benzo[b]fluoranthene --1.2 1.1 21 ----<0.0790 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 1.09 <0.0839 <0.0810 <0.0728 <0.0812 <0.0820
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene --15,600 NE NE ----<0.0790 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 0.341 <0.0839 <0.0810 0.115 <0.0812 <0.0820
Benzo[k]fluoranthene --12 11 210 ----<0.0790 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 1.11 <0.0839 <0.0810 <0.0728 <0.0812 <0.0820
Chrysene --36 110 2,100 ----0.0855 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 2.28 <0.0839 <0.0810 0.0744 <0.0812 <0.0820
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene --0.38 0.11 2.1 ----<0.0790 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 0.180 <0.0839 <0.0810 <0.0728 <0.0812 <0.0820
Fluoranthene --670 480 6,000 ----0.181 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 8.02 <0.0839 <0.0810 0.121 <0.0812 <0.0820
Fluorene --670 480 6,000 ----<0.0790 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 0.247 <0.0839 <0.0810 <0.0728 <0.0812 <0.0820
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene --3.9 1.1 21 ----<0.0790 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 0.352 <0.0839 <0.0810 <0.0728 <0.0812 <0.0820
1-Methylnaphthalene --0.11 18 73 ----<0.0790 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 0.202 <0.0839 <0.0810 <0.0728 <0.0812 <0.0820
2-Methylnaphthalene --3.1 48 600 ----<0.0790 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 0.272 <0.0839 <0.0810 <0.0728 <0.0812 <0.0820
Naphthalene --0.39 4.1 18 ----<0.0790 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 0.882 <0.0839 <0.0810 <0.0728 <0.0812 <0.0820
Phenanthrene --134 NE NE ----0.108 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 0.628 <0.0839 <0.0810 0.107 <0.0812 <0.0820
Pyrene --440 360 4,500 ----0.127 <0.0800 <0.0812 <0.0743 3.68 <0.0839 <0.0810 0.125 <0.0812 <0.0820
RCRA Metals (6010C/7471B)Range Average
Arsenic --5.8 0.68 3.0 1 - 18 4.8 2.63 2.91 4.56 3.67 3.01 3.19 3.43 <2.19 3.69 3.72
Barium --580 3,100 47,000 50 - 1,000 356 185 208 211 225 142 199 173 85.4 174 212
Chromium --360,000 23,000 100,000 7 - 300 65 7.15 6.58 7.47 6.32 9.89 8.08 6.15 2.63 12.9 11.9
Lead --270 400 (4)800 (4)ND - 50 16 31.4 23.8 30.7 23.1 37.9 31.2 22.7 22.7 35.0 41.3
Mercury --1.0 2.3 3.10 0.03 - 0.52 0.121 <0.115 <0.118 <0.120 <0.112 <0.111 <0.126 <0.119 <0.109 <0.123 <0.122
TPH-DRO (8015C)100 NE NE NE ----7.50 7.02 <5.88 <5.63 114 <6.26 <6.03 <5.47 <6.09 <6.03
TPH-GRO (8015C)50 NE NE NE ----<6.42 <5.82 <5.88 <5.19 207 <6.46 <6.09 <4.58 <5.90 <7.75
Notes:
Petroleum Hydrocarbons (January 2) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (October 2017).3) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils obtained from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005.4) Values shown are based on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) (November 2017).Values reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
For VOCs, SVOCs, and metals, only those compounds detected in at least one sample shown above.
Bold indicates concentration exceeds the Protection of Groundwater PSRG.Bold indicates concentration exceeds the Residential Use PSRG.
Bold and highlighted values exceed the Industrial/Commercial PSRG.
Method number follows parameter in parenthesis
VOCs = volatile organic compoundsSVOCs = semi-VOCsTPH-DRO = diesel-range total petroleum hydrocarbonsTPH-GRO = gasoline-range total petroleum hydrocarbons
MADEP = Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
NA = not analyzed, -- = not applicable
NE = not established
SPE-4 SPE-5 SPW-1 SPW-2Sample ID DEQ IHSB Protection of
Groundwater PSRGs (2)
DEQ IHSB Residential Use
PSRGs (2)
DEQ IHSB Industrial/Commercial
PSRGs (2)
North Carolina
Background Levels (3)
DEQ UST Section Action
Levels (1)
SPE-1 SPE-2 SPW-3 SPW-4 SPW-5SPE-3
S:\AAA-Master Projects\City of Kannapolis - KAN\KAN-012 Infrastructure, Streetscape, & Baseball Projects\EMP\Data Tables 7-16-187/16/2018
Table 2 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3
Summary of Groundwater Elevation Data
Proposed Baseball Stadium
Kannapolis, North Carolina
H&H Job No. KAN-012
Well Well Screened Water
Monitoring Well Diameter Depth Interval Table Depth
Identification (inches)(ft)(ft)(ft bgs)
TMW-1 1 26 11-26 23.53
TMW-2 1 25 15-25 24.50
TMW-3 1 22 12-22 15.34
TMW-4 1 25 10-25 16.03
TMW-5 1 30 20-30 21.89
TMW-6 1 25 15-25 24.34
TMW-7 1 28 18-28 24.41
Notes:
Depth to groundwater measurements collected from the monitoring wells on January 23 or 26, 2018.
ft bgs = feet below ground surface
S:\AAA-Master Projects\City of Kannapolis - KAN\KAN-012 Infrastructure, Streetscape, & Baseball Projects\EMP\Data Tables 7-16-18
7/16/2018
Table 3 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data
Proposed Baseball Stadium
Kannapolis, North Carolina
H&H Job No. KAN-012
Location
Former Bob's
Laundry/Puritan
Laundry and
Cleaners
Former Gas Station
Downgradient of
Former Wrenn's
Cleaners
Downgradient to
Cross-Gradient of
Former Goodyear
and Star Cleaners
Downgradient of
Former Off-Site Gas
Station
Sample ID TMW-1 TMW-2 TMW-3 TMW-4 TMW-5 TMW-6 TMW-7
Date 1/26/2018 1/23/2018 1/26/2018 1/26/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018 1/23/2018
VOCs (8260B)
Chloroform 70 36 9.36 5.78 2.61 3.12 4.49 <1.00 <1.00
Toluene 600 16,000 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 1.55 <1.00
SVOCs (8270D)----BRL NA BRL BRL NA NA NA
VPH (MADEP)----BRL BRL BRL BRL NA NA BRL
EPH (MADEP)----BRL NA BRL BRL NA NA NA
Notes:1) North Carolina 15A NCAC 02L Groundwater Standards (NC 2L Standard) (April 2013)
2) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels dated February 2018
For VOCs, only those compounds detected in at least one sample shown above
Method number follows parameter in parenthesis
Values reported in micrograms/liter (µg/L).
GW = Groundwater
VOCs = volatile organic compounds
SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds
MADEP = Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
EPH = extractable petroleum hydrocarbons
VPH = volatile petroleum hydrocarbons
NA = not analyzed; BRL = below reporting limits
-- = not applicable
NC 2L Standard (1)
Former Automotive Repair ShopsScreening Criteria
Non-Residential
GW VISLs (2)
S:\AAA-Master Projects\City of Kannapolis - KAN\KAN-012 Infrastructure, Streetscape, & Baseball Projects\EMP\Data Tables 7-16-18
7/16/2018
Table 4 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
SITE LOCATION MAP
PROPOSED BASEBALL STADIUM
OAK AVENUE & W. A STREET
KANNAPOLIS, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
JOB NO:
REVISION NO:
FIGURE NO:
7-30-18 0
1KAN-012
0 2000 4000
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
N
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100Charlotte, NC 28203704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f)
KANNAPOLIS, NC 1996
SITE
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. KAN-012
DATE: 7-30-18
FIGURE NO. 2
PROPOSED BASEBALL STADIUM
OAK AVENUE & W. A STREET
KANNAPOLIS, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE MAP
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PAD-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER
POLE-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER
ELEVATOR
BOILER ROOM
DUMPSTER
APPROXIMATE AREA SUBJECT TO
EXISTING BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT FOR NC RESEARCH
CAMPUS (INCLUDING WATER VAULT)
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
WATSO
N

C
R
I
C
K

D
R
I
V
E
UNDEVELOPED
VACANT
(200 & 206 OAK AVENUE MALL DRIVE)
OAK AVENUE MALL
(318-358 OAK AVENUE MALL DRIVE)
CAROLINAS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM
(201 DALE EARNHARDT BOULEVARD)
FORMER PURITAN/ BOB'S LAUNDRY &
DRY CLEANERS (DEMOLISHED)
(311 WEST A STREET)
VACANT OFFICES
(201 & 203 OAK AVENUE MALL DRIVE)VACANTCROSSFIT
(134 WEST AVENUE)
VIRGINIA'S
(213 WEST A STREET)
ROWAN CABARRUS COMMUNITY COLLEGE
(120 WEST AVENUE)VACANTCAROLINA INTERIORS
(115 OAK AVENUE)
FORMER STAR CLEANERS
(108 WEST AVENUE)
FORMER GOODYEAR
SERVICE GARAGE
(100 WEST AVENUE)
NORTH CAROLINA RESEARCH CAMPUS
(FORMER FIELDCREST CANNON PLANT #1)
(2014 N. MAIN STREET)
LA
U
R
E
A
T
E

W
A
Y
CHES
T
N
U
T

A
V
E
N
U
EWELLNESS WAYOAK AVENUEWEST AVENUES. MAIN STREETW. A
STREET
W.
1
S
T

S
T
R
E
E
T
VACANT RETAIL
(215 W. A. STREET)
W.
B

S
T
R
E
E
T
55-GALLON DRUM OF
WASTE COMPRESSOR OIL
VACANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING (DEMOLISHED)
(134-144 OAK AVENUE)
SOIL STOCKPILES
FORMER WATER VAULT
FORMER WRENN'S CLEANERS
(136 WEST AVENUE)
FORMER GAS STATION W/ THREE USTs
(134 OAK AVENUE)
FORMER AUTO REPAIR SHOPS (DEMOLISHED)
(136-138 OAK AVENUE)
FORMER WASTEWATER
TREATMENT LINES
FORMER DYE
PROCESS AREA
FORMER FIELDCREST CANNON PLANT
NO. 1 BLEACHING BUILDING
FORMER GAS STATION
(400 W. A STREET)
W.
A

S
T
R
E
E
T
S:\AAA-Master Projects\City of Kannapolis - KAN\KAN-012 Infrastructure, Streetscape, & Baseball Projects\Phase II ESA\Figures\Site Map.dwg, FIG 2, 7/30/2018 12:36:22 PM, erichardson
WELLNESS WAY
TMW-5
TMW-7
B-4
SB-15
SB-13
SB-19
SB-20
SB-23
SB-24
SB-25SB-26
FORMER GAS STATION
(400 W. A STREET)
W.
B

S
T
R
E
E
TOAK AVENUEFORMER WRENN'S CLEANERS
(136 WEST AVENUE)
SB-3
SB-4/
TMW-2
SB-5
SB-7
SB-8/
TMW-4
SB-9
SB-10
B-1
B-2
SB-11
B-5B-3
SB-1/
TMW-1
SB-2
SB-6/
TMW-3
TMW-6
SB-17
SB-16
SB-14
SB-18
SB-18A
SB-21
SB-22
SB-12
FORMER AUTO REPAIR SHOPS (DEMOLISHED)
(136-138 OAK AVENUE)
FORMER GAS STATION W/ THREE USTs
(134 OAK AVENUE)
FORMER WATER VAULT
FORMER STAR CLEANERS
(108 WEST AVENUE)
FORMER PURITAN/ BOB'S LAUNDRY &
DRY CLEANERS (DEMOLISHED)
(311 WEST A STREET)
W.
A

S
T
R
E
E
T
CHES
T
N
U
T

A
V
E
N
U
E
LA
U
R
E
A
T
E

W
A
Y
FORMER GOODYEAR
SERVICE GARAGE
(100 WEST AVENUE)
BURIED TIMBER PILINGS W. A
STREET
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. KAN-012
DATE: 7-30-18
FIGURE NO. 3
PROPOSED BASEBALL STADIUM
OAK AVENUE & W. A STREET
KANNAPOLIS, NORTH CAROLINA
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL
LOCATION
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL/
SOIL BORING LOCATION
SOIL BORING LOCATION
APPROXIMATE AREA SUBJECT TO
EXISTING BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT FOR NC RESEARCH
CAMPUS (INCLUDING WATER VAULT)
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
LA
U
R
E
A
T
E

W
A
Y
CHES
T
N
U
T

A
V
E
N
U
EWELLNESS WAYOAK AVENUEW.
B

S
T
R
E
E
T
W.
A

S
T
R
E
E
T
FORMER PURITAN/ BOB'S LAUNDRY &
DRY CLEANERS (DEMOLISHED)
(311 WEST A STREET)
FORMER STAR CLEANERS
(108 WEST AVENUE)
FORMER GOODYEAR
SERVICE GARAGE
(100 WEST AVENUE)FORMER WATER VAULT
FORMER GAS STATION W/ THREE USTs
(134 OAK AVENUE)
FORMER AUTO REPAIR SHOPS (DEMOLISHED)
(136-138 OAK AVENUE)
FORMER GAS STATION
(400 W. A STREET)
BURIED TIMBER PILINGS
FORMER WRENN'S CLEANERS
(136 WEST AVENUE)S:\AAA-Master Projects\City of Kannapolis - KAN\KAN-012 Infrastructure, Streetscape, & Baseball Projects\Phase II ESA\Figures\Sample Location Map.dwg, FIG 3, 7/30/2018 12:31:20 PM, erichardson
JOB NO. KAN-012
REVISION NO. 0DATE: 7-30-18
FIGURE NO. 4
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF SOIL
STOCKPILE
SOIL BORING LOCATION
PROPOSED BASEBALL STADIUM
OAK AVANUE & W. A STREET
KANNAPOLIS, NORTH CAROLINA
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
SPW-1
SPW-2 SPW-3
SPW-4
SPW-5
SPE-3 SPE-2
SPE-5 SPE-1
SPE-4
STOCKPILE EAST
(SPE)
STOCKPILE WEST
(SPW)W.
A
STREETWELLNESS WAYS:\AAA-Master Projects\City of Kannapolis - KAN\KAN-012 Infrastructure, Streetscape, & Baseball Projects\Phase II ESA\Figures\Stockpile Sample Location Map.dwg, FIG 4, 7/30/2018 12:37:52 PM, erichardson

Appendix A
Site Layout/Grading Plan/Cut and Fill Maps
BW 806.00BW 806.00BW 806.00BW 806.00BW 806.00BW 806.00BW 806.00BW 806.00BW 806.00BW 806.00BW 806.00BW 806.00BW 806.00BW 806.00BW 806.00BW 806.00806.60806.50806.40806.30806.20806.10
806.10806.10806.10806.10806.20806.20 806.20806.20806.20WT 806.20WT 806.20WT 806.20 WT 806.20WT 806.20WT 806.20WT 806.20WT 806.20WT 806.20WT 806.20WT 806.20WT 806.20WT 806.20WT
8
0
6
.
2
0 WT 806.205/24/2018 5:17 PMPROJECT NO.Copyright CISSUED BY:ISSUED DATE:SHEET TITLE: DISCIPLINE - CATEGORY - SUB CATEGORY - SHEETREVISIONSArchitecture, Planning,Interiors, Programming4800 Main Street, Suite 300Kansas City, Missouri 64112816-221-1500®®®®www.populous.comwww.creech-design.comwww.JezerinacGroup.comwww.hei-eng.comwww.LandDesign.comABCDEFGHwww.wcandpartners.comMINOR LEAGUE BALLPARK
& ENTERTAINMENT VENUE 4/19/2018 4:34:44 PMKannapolis, North Carolina Associate ArchitectCreech & AssociatesStructural EngineerJezerinac Group, PLLCMechanical, Electrical and Plumbing EngineerHenderson Engineers, Inc.Civil Engineer and Landscape ArchitectLandDesign, Inc.Food Service ConsultantWC & PartnersCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSMAY 25, 201816.434720181000 W. Morehead Street, Suite 120Charlotte, North Carolina 28208704-376-60004400 PGA Boulevard, Suite 306Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410561-622-85858345 Lenexa Drive, Suite 300Lenexa, Kansas 66214913-742-5000223 N Graham StreetCharlotte, North Carolina 28202704-333-03258055 East Tufts Ave, Suite 1320Denver, CO 80237303-649-1600NO. DATEDESCRIPTIONMAY 25, 2018PLAYING FIELDGRADING PLANPF2.01PROJECT NORTH03216SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"2 4 8NATURAL TURFPROFILERE: A/PF1.03INFIELD SKINNEDAREA PROFILERE: D/PF1.03WARNINGTRACK PROFILERE: C/PF1.03PLAYING FIELDLEGEND1.3%1.3%0.7%1.0%
1.0%1.0%1.0%1.0%1.3%
1.3%0.7%0.75%0.75%0.75%FLAT OUTFIELD+ 806.20 +FLAT OUTFIELD+ 806.20 +FLAT INFIELD+ 806.60 +FLAT OUTFIELD+ 806.20 +PROPOSEDMAJOR CONTOUR300PROPOSED MINORCONTOUR301BASE OF WALLFINISHED GRADEELEVATIONBW XX.XXEDGE OFWARNING TRACKELEVATIONWT XX.XXPROPOSED FLATCONTOURPLAYING FIELDNOTES1. RE: ARCH. DRAWINGS FORSTADIUM WALL LAYOUT &MATERIALS NOTES.2. GRADE FIELD TO A SMOOTH,EVEN PLAYING SURFACE TOTHE SPOT ELEVATIONS ANDCONTOURS INDICATED.3. CONTOUR INTERVAL ISONE-TENTH FOOT, UNLESSOTHERWISE INDICATED.FIELD WALLRE: ARCHITECTURALFIELD WALLRE: ARCHITECTURALFIELD WALLRE: ARCHITECTURALFIELD WALLRE: ARCHITECTURALFIELD WALLRE: ARCHITECTURALFIELD WALLRE: ARCHITECTURAL
806.60806.50806.40806.30806.20806.10
806.10806.10806.10806.10806.20806.20 806.20806.20806.2020'-0" O.C. TYP.20'-0" O.C. TYP.20'-0" O.C. TYP.20'-0" O.C. TYP.
20'-0" O.C. TYP.20'-0" O.C. TYP.20'-0"5'-0"20'-0"5'-0"
2
0
'
-
0
"20'-0"10'-0"1
0
'
-
0
"5'-0"10'-0"10'-0"5'-0"5/24/2018 5:17 PMPROJECT NO.Copyright CISSUED BY:ISSUED DATE:SHEET TITLE: DISCIPLINE - CATEGORY - SUB CATEGORY - SHEETREVISIONSArchitecture, Planning,Interiors, Programming4800 Main Street, Suite 300Kansas City, Missouri 64112816-221-1500®®®®www.populous.comwww.creech-design.comwww.JezerinacGroup.comwww.hei-eng.comwww.LandDesign.comABCDEFGHwww.wcandpartners.comMINOR LEAGUE BALLPARK
& ENTERTAINMENT VENUE 4/19/2018 4:34:44 PMKannapolis, North Carolina Associate ArchitectCreech & AssociatesStructural EngineerJezerinac Group, PLLCMechanical, Electrical and Plumbing EngineerHenderson Engineers, Inc.Civil Engineer and Landscape ArchitectLandDesign, Inc.Food Service ConsultantWC & PartnersCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSMAY 25, 201816.434720181000 W. Morehead Street, Suite 120Charlotte, North Carolina 28208704-376-60004400 PGA Boulevard, Suite 306Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410561-622-85858345 Lenexa Drive, Suite 300Lenexa, Kansas 66214913-742-5000223 N Graham StreetCharlotte, North Carolina 28202704-333-03258055 East Tufts Ave, Suite 1320Denver, CO 80237303-649-1600NO. DATEDESCRIPTIONMAY 25, 2018PLAYING FIELDSUBDRAINAGE PLANPF3.01PROJECT NORTH03216SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"2 4 8NATURAL TURFPROFILERE: A/PF1.03INFIELD SKINNEDAREA PROFILERE: D/PF1.03WARNINGTRACK PROFILERE: C/PF1.03PLAYING FIELDLEGENDCO-A1FG = 806.16RIM = 805.83INV. IN (NW) 12" HDPE =801.27INV. IN (NE) 12" HDPE = 803.04INV. OUT (SE) 15" HDPE = 801.02CO-A2FG = 806.12RIM = 805.79INV. IN (NE) 12" HDPE = 802.47INV. OUT (SW) 12" HDPE = 802.47CO-A3FG = 806.05RIM = 805.72INV. IN (E) 6" HDPE = 803.58INV. OUT (S) 12" HDPE = 803.08CO-A4FG = 806.15RIM = 805.82INV. OUT (W) 6" HDPE = 804.23CO-B1FG = 806.35RIM = 805.68INV. IN (NW) 15" HDPE = 801.47INV. OUT (S) 15" HDPE = 801.47CO-B2FG = 806.10RIM = 805.77INV. IN (NW) 8" HDPE = 803.26INV. IN (SE) 8" HDPE = 803.21INV. OUT (SW) 15" HDPE = 802.63CO-B2BFG = 806.10RIM = 805.77INV. OUT (N) 8" HDPE = 804.02CO-C3FG = 806.10RIM = 805.77INV. OUT (S) 6" HDPE = 804.18CO-C1FG = 806.12RIM = 805.79INV. IN (NE) 12" HDPE = 802.22INV. OUT (SW) 12" HDPE = 802.22CO-C2FG = 806.08RIM = 805.75INV. IN (NE) 6" HDPE = 803.45INV. OUT (W) 12" HDPE = 802.95CO-AFG = 806.07RIM = 805.74INV. IN (W) 15" HDPE = 800.30INV. IN (N) 15" HDPE = 800.71INV. IN (E) 12" HDPE = 801.75INV. OUT (S) 18" HDPE = 800.05CO-B2AFG = 806.15RIM = 805.82INV. OUT (E) 8" HDPE = 804.07CO-A2AFG = 806.60RIM = 805.93INV. OUT (SW) 12" HDPE = 803.77131.35 L.F. 6" PERFORATED HDPE COLLECTOR PIPE @ 0.5%122.02 L.F. 12" PERFORATED HDPE COLLECTOR PIPE @ 0.5%239.93 L.F. 12" PERFORATED HDPE COLLECTOR PIPE @ 0.5%145.24 L.F. 12" PERFORATED HDPE COLLECTOR PIPE @ 0.5%143.02 L.F. 15" PERFORATED HDPE COLLECTOR PIPE @ 0.5%230.92 L.F. 15" PERFORATED HDPE COLLECTOR PIPE @ 0.5%152.74 L.F. 15" PERFORATED HDPE COLLECTOR PIPE @ 0.5%161.54 L.F. 8" PERFORATED HDPE COLLECTOR PIPE @ 0.5%161.54 L.F. 8" PERFORATED HDPE COLLECTOR PIPE @ 0.5%146.18 L.F. 6" PERFORATED HDPE COLLECTOR PIPE @ 0.5%108.86 L.F. 12" PERFORATED HDPE COLLECTOR PIPE @ 0.5%95.02 L.F. 12" PERFORATED HDPE COLLECTOR PIPE @ 0.5%QCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDQCDPERIMETER TRENCH DRAIN WITHCATCH BASINS @ EVERY 15m AS SHOWNRE: E/PF3.02CONNECT TO PERIMETER COLLECTOR PIPEWITH 6" SOLID HDPE & INSERT-A-TEEPERIMETER TRENCH DRAIN WITHCATCH BASINS @ EVERY 15m AS SHOWNRE: E/PF3.02CONNECT TO PERIMETER COLLECTOR PIPEWITH 6" SOLID HDPE & INSERT-A-TEE6" PERFORATED HDPE PERIMETER WALL DRAINWITH CLEANOUTS LOCATED EVERY 50 L.F. AS SHOWNRE: D & H/PF3.02CONNECT TO PERIMETER COLLECTOR PIPEWITH 6" SOLID HDPE & INSERT-A-TEE6" PERFORATED HDPE PERIMETER WALL DRAINWITH CLEANOUTS LOCATED EVERY 50 L.F. AS SHOWNRE: D & H/PF3.02CONNECT TO PERIMETER COLLECTOR PIPEWITH 6" SOLID HDPE & INSERT-A-TEE6" PERFORATED HDPE PERIMETER WALL DRAINWITH CLEANOUTS LOCATED EVERY 50 L.F. AS SHOWNRE: D & H/PF3.02CONNECT TO PERIMETER COLLECTOR PIPEWITH 6" SOLID HDPE & INSERT-A-TEE6" PERFORATED HDPE PERIMETER WALL DRAINWITH CLEANOUTS LOCATED EVERY 50 L.F. AS SHOWNRE: D & H/PF3.02CONNECT TO PERIMETER COLLECTOR PIPEWITH 6" SOLID HDPE & INSERT-A-TEE6" PERFORATED HDPE PERIMETER WALL DRAINWITH CLEANOUTS LOCATED EVERY 50 L.F. AS SHOWNRE: D & H/PF3.02CONNECT TO PERIMETER COLLECTOR PIPEWITH 6" SOLID HDPE & INSERT-A-TEE6" PERFORATED HDPE PERIMETER WALL DRAINWITH CLEANOUTS LOCATED EVERY 50 L.F. AS SHOWNRE: D & H/PF3.02CONNECT TO PERIMETER COLLECTOR PIPEWITH 6" SOLID HDPE & INSERT-A-TEEPROPOSEDMAJOR CONTOUR300PROPOSED MINORCONTOUR3016" PERFORATEDHDPE LATERAL PIPESLOTTED HDPECOLLECTOR PIPE(SIZE PER PLAN)COLLECTORCLEANOUTRE: C & G/PF3.02COPLAYING FIELDNOTES1. CONTRACTOR TO AVOIDEXCESSIVE TRAFFIC OVERCOMPLETED DRAINAGESYSTEM TO AVOID CRUSHINGOF PIPE.2. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEPROOF OF POSITIVEDRAINAGE PRIOR TOBACKFILLING OF PIPE.3. LATERAL PIPING SHALL HAVEA MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.5%4. COLLECTOR PIPING TO HAVEA MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.5%77.91 L.F. 18" SOLID HDPE PLAYING FIELDDRAINAGE COLLECTOR OUTLET PIPE @ 0.5%UNDER SEATING BOWL TO DRAINAGE STRUCTUREWITHIN CONCOURSE (PER CIVIL PLANS)INV. IN AT CIVIL STRUCTURE = 799.666" PERFORATEDHDPE WALL DRAINRE: D/PF3.02PERIMETER WALLDRAIN QUCK CAPCLEANOUTRE: H/PF3.02QCD20'-0"5'-4"16'-2"28'-0"28'-0"6" PERFORATED HDPE LATERAL PIPE @ 0.5% - TYP.6" PERFORATED HDPE LATERAL PIPE @ 0.5% - TYP.6" PERFORATED HDPE LATERAL PIPE @ 0.5% - TYP.6" PERFORATED HDPE LATERAL PIPE @ 0.5% - TYP.6" PERFORATED HDPE LATERAL PIPE @ 0.5% - TYP.6" PERFORATED HDPE LATERAL PIPE @ 0.5% - TYP.6" PERFORATED HDPE LATERAL PIPE @ 0.5% - TYP.
6" PERFORATED HDPE LATERAL PIPE @ 0.5% - TYP.
CONCOURSE LEVEL819' - 0"
BA
PLAYING FIELD806' - 0"
2'-6"
4 TREADS @ 1'-0"
4'-0"5'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"
815'-11 1/2"
815'-4"815'-3 1/2"
814'-8"814'-7 1/2"
814'-0"813'-11 1/2"
813'-4"813'-3 1/2"
812'-8"812'-7 1/2"
812'-0"811'-11 1/2"
811'-4"811'-3 1/2"
810'-8"810'-7 1/2"
810'-0"809'-11 1/2"
809'-4"809'-3 1/2"
808'-8"808'-7 1/2"
808'-0"807'-11 1/2"
807'-4"807'-3 1/2"
806'-8"806'-7 1/2"
805'-11 1/2"806'-0"
ATTACH BACKSTOPNETTING TO TOP OFCONCRETE CURB
SLOPE TO DRAIN
SLOPE 1/2", TYP.8"1"6"5 EQ. RISERS2'-8 3/4"818'-8"
818'-8 3/4"
CONCOURSE LEVEL819' - 0"
BA
DUGOUT803' - 8"
PLAYING FIELD806' - 0"
815'-11 1/2"
815'-4"815'-3 1/2"
814'-8"814'-7 1/2"
814'-0"813'-11 1/2"
813'-4"813'-3 1/2"
812'-8"812'-7 1/2"
812'-0"811'-11 1/2"
811'-4"811'-3 1/2"
810'-8"
810'-8 1/2"
SLOPE 1/2", TYP.
SLOPE TO DRAIN
7'-6"5"4"ATTACH BACKSTOP NETTINGTO TOP OF DUGOUT LIDA8-2-213
8"7'-0"4'-0"11'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-6"8'-0"
816'-0"
816'-8"4 EQ. RISERS2'-4"4 TREADS @ 12"
4'-0"
818'-8"
816'-9"
0'
PROJECT NO.
Copyright C
ISSUED BY:
ISSUED DATE:
SHEET TITLE:
DISCIPLINE - CATEGORY - SUB CATEGORY - SHEET
REVISIONS
Architecture, Planning,Interiors, Programming4800 Main Street, Suite 300Kansas City, Missouri 64112816-221-1500
®
®
®
®
www.populous.com
www.creech-design.com
www.JezerinacGroup.com
www.hei-eng.com
www.LandDesign.com
A
B
C D E
F
G
H
1'2'4'
www.wcandpartners.com MINOR LEAGUE BALLPARK& ENTERTAINMENT VENUE5/24/2018 4:25:22 PMKannapolis, North CarolinaAssociate ArchitectCreech & Associates
Structural EngineerJezerinac Group, PLLC
Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing EngineerHenderson Engineers, Inc.
Civil Engineer and Landscape ArchitectLandDesign, Inc.
Food Service ConsultantWC & Partners
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
MAY 25, 2018
BOWL DETAILS
A8-1-1
16.4347
MAY 25, 2018
2018
1000 W. Morehead Street, Suite 120Charlotte, North Carolina 28208704-376-6000
4400 PGA Boulevard, Suite 306Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410561-622-8585
8345 Lenexa Drive, Suite 300Lenexa, Kansas 66214913-742-5000
223 N Graham StreetCharlotte, North Carolina 28202704-333-0325
8055 East Tufts Ave, Suite 1320Denver, CO 80237303-649-1600
1/2" = 1'-0" RE: A2-1-B/ 11BOWL SECTION - TYPICAL AISLE
1/2" = 1'-0" RE: A2-1-B/ 12BOWL SECTION - DUGOUT TOILET
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
CONCOURSE LEVEL819' - 0"
BA
PLAYING FIELD806' - 0"
8"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"3'-0"
814'-8"814'-7 1/2"
814'-0"813'-11 1/2"
813'-4"813'-3 1/2"
812'-8"812'-7 1/2"
812'-0"811'-11 1/2"
811'-4"811'-3 1/2"
810'-8"810'-7 1/2"
810'-0"809'-11 1/2"
809'-4"809'-3 1/2"
808'-8"808'-7 1/2"
808'-0"807'-11 1/2"
FIELD WALL PAD
807'-4"
815'-3 1/2"
BACKSTOP NETTING
CONCOURSE LEVEL819' - 0"
A B
PLAYING FIELD806' - 0"
SLOPE TO DRAINSLOPE TO DRAINFIELD WALL PAD
SLOPE
SLOPE
8"12'-0"1'-4"
4 TREADS @ 1'-0"
4'-0"6'-8"1'-4"
4 TREADS @ 1'-0"
4'-0"6'-8"1'-4"
4 TREADS @ 1'-0"
4'-0"9'-2"
809'-11 1/2"810'-1 1/2"
812'-7 1/2"812'-9 1/2"
815'-3 1/2"
807'-4"5 EQ. RISERS5 EQ. RISERS5 EQ. RISERS0'
PROJECT NO.
Copyright C
ISSUED BY:
ISSUED DATE:
SHEET TITLE:
DISCIPLINE - CATEGORY - SUB CATEGORY - SHEET
REVISIONS
Architecture, Planning,Interiors, Programming4800 Main Street, Suite 300Kansas City, Missouri 64112816-221-1500
®
®
®
®
www.populous.com
www.creech-design.com
www.JezerinacGroup.com
www.hei-eng.com
www.LandDesign.com
A
B
C D E
F
G
H
1'2'4'
www.wcandpartners.com MINOR LEAGUE BALLPARK& ENTERTAINMENT VENUE5/24/2018 4:25:26 PMKannapolis, North CarolinaAssociate ArchitectCreech & Associates
Structural EngineerJezerinac Group, PLLC
Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing EngineerHenderson Engineers, Inc.
Civil Engineer and Landscape ArchitectLandDesign, Inc.
Food Service ConsultantWC & Partners
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
MAY 25, 2018
BOWL DETAILS
A8-1-2
16.4347
MAY 25, 2018
2018
1000 W. Morehead Street, Suite 120Charlotte, North Carolina 28208704-376-6000
4400 PGA Boulevard, Suite 306Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410561-622-8585
8345 Lenexa Drive, Suite 300Lenexa, Kansas 66214913-742-5000
223 N Graham StreetCharlotte, North Carolina 28202704-333-0325
8055 East Tufts Ave, Suite 1320Denver, CO 80237303-649-1600
1/2" = 1'-0" RE: A2-1-D/ 11BOWL SECTION - RIGHT FIELD @ BULLPEN AREA
1/2" = 1'-0" RE: A2-1-E/ 12BOWL SECTION - RIGHT FIELD HI TOP BOXES
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
A
DUGOUT803' - 8"
PLAYING FIELD806' - 0"
A8-9-16
8"7'-0"4'-0"5'-0"3'-0"2'-4"3'-4"1'-10"5"4"4 TREADS @ 12"
4'-0"
ATTACH BACKSTOP NETTINGTO TOP OF DUGOUT ROOF
SLOPE TO DRAIN
SLOPE TO DRAIN4 EQ. RISERS2'-4"A8-2-214
SLOPE TO DRAIN
R B3RB5
PAINT ALL EXPOSED SURFACES OF DUGOUT WALL AND ROOF
CONCOURSE LEVEL819' - 0"
BA
PLAYING FIELD806' - 0"
2'-6"
5 TREADS @ 1'-0"
5'-0"7'-0"
4 TREADS @ 1'-0"
4'-0"8'-0"
4 TREADS @ 1'-0"
4'-0"8'-0"
4 TREADS @ 1'-0"
4'-0"8'-0"8"
SLOPE
SLOPE TO DRAIN
SLOPE TO DRAIN SLOPE TO DRAIN 807'-4"FIELD WALL PAD
SLOPE
SLOPE 815'-3 1/2"
812'-9 1/2"
809'-11 1/2"810'-1 1/2"
812'-7 1/2"
815'-5 1/2"
818'-8 3/4"6 EQ. RISERS5 EQ. RISERS5 EQ. RISERS5 EQ. RISERSCONCOURSE LEVEL819' - 0"
FW
PLAYING FIELD806' - 0"
BA
819'-0"
815'-0"814'-11"
811'-0"VARIES
819'-0"
816'-11"817'-0"3 EQ. RISERS8"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"3'-0"
2 TREADS @ 1'-0"
2'-0"
0'
PROJECT NO.
Copyright C
ISSUED BY:
ISSUED DATE:
SHEET TITLE:
DISCIPLINE - CATEGORY - SUB CATEGORY - SHEET
REVISIONS
Architecture, Planning,Interiors, Programming4800 Main Street, Suite 300Kansas City, Missouri 64112816-221-1500
®
®
®
®
www.populous.com
www.creech-design.com
www.JezerinacGroup.com
www.hei-eng.com
www.LandDesign.com
A
B
C D E
F
G
H
1'2'4'
www.wcandpartners.com MINOR LEAGUE BALLPARK& ENTERTAINMENT VENUE5/24/2018 4:25:31 PMKannapolis, North CarolinaAssociate ArchitectCreech & Associates
Structural EngineerJezerinac Group, PLLC
Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing EngineerHenderson Engineers, Inc.
Civil Engineer and Landscape ArchitectLandDesign, Inc.
Food Service ConsultantWC & Partners
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
MAY 25, 2018
BOWL DETAILS
A8-1-3
16.4347
MAY 25, 2018
2018
1000 W. Morehead Street, Suite 120Charlotte, North Carolina 28208704-376-6000
4400 PGA Boulevard, Suite 306Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410561-622-8585
8345 Lenexa Drive, Suite 300Lenexa, Kansas 66214913-742-5000
223 N Graham StreetCharlotte, North Carolina 28202704-333-0325
8055 East Tufts Ave, Suite 1320Denver, CO 80237303-649-1600
1/2" = 1'-0" RE: A2-1-B/ 12BOWL SECTION - TYPICAL DUGOUT
1/2" = 1'-0" RE: A2-1-A/ 11BOWL SECTION - LEFT FIELD PICNIC TERRACES
1/2" = 1'-0" RE: A2-2-F/ 13BOWL SECTION - RIGHT FIELD BAR TERRACES
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
Job: KANNAPOLIS - BROWNFIELD-806Units: Ft-CYTue Feb 20, 2018 12:27:23 Page 1 Volume Report Subgrade vs. Stripped Area Volume Comp/Ratio Compact Export Change Total Cut Fill OnGrade Cut Fill Cut Fill Cut Fill -Import Per .1 Ft FIELD 19,634 19,634 0 0 6,134 0 1.00 1.15 6,134 0 6,134 84 STADIUM/CONCOURSE 20,181 10,385 9,424 372 1,515 330 1.00 1.15 1,515 379 1,136 86 Regions Total 39,815 30,019 9,424 372 7,649 330 7,649 379 7,270 170 Unspecified 11,105 204 10,900 2 61 494 1.00 1.15 61 568 -507 47 Job Total 50,920 30,223 20,324 374 7,710 824 7,710 947 6,763 217 Plane Slope Stripping Qtys Area Area Depth Volume -STRIPPING AREA 50,920 51,036 0.667 1,261 Plane Slope Sectional Qtys Area Area Depth Volume FIELD 19,634 19,634 1.500 1,091 STADIUM/CONCOURSE 20,181 20,616 0.667 509 Sectional Total 39,815 40,250 1,600 11.25 10.50 9.75 9.00 8.25 7.50 6.75 6.00 5.25 4.50 3.75 3.00 2.25 1.50 0.75 ± .100 0.75 1.50 2.25 3.00 3.75 4.50 5.25 6.00 6.75 7.50 8.25 9.00 9.75 10.50 11.25BROWNFIELD AREA - FFE:806
Job: KANNAPOLIS - NON BROWNFIELD-806Units: Ft-CYTue Feb 20, 2018 11:08:03 Page 1 Volume Report Subgrade vs. Stripped Area Volume Comp/Ratio Compact Export Change Total Cut Fill OnGrade Cut Fill Cut Fill Cut Fill -Import Per .1 Ft FIELD 110,622 105,150 5,309 163 36,079 499 1.00 1.15 36,079 574 35,505 471 STADIUM/CONCOURSE 128,286 36,226 81,790 10,270 5,477 18,880 1.00 1.15 5,477 21,712 -16,235 546 Regions Total 238,908 141,376 87,099 10,433 41,556 19,379 41,556 22,286 19,270 1,017 Unspecified 48,410 9,249 36,161 3,000 1,044 5,924 1.00 1.15 1,044 6,813 -5,769 206 Job Total 287,318 150,625 123,260 13,433 42,600 25,303 42,600 29,099 13,501 1,223 Plane Slope Stripping Qtys Area Area Depth Volume -STRIPPING AREA 147,290 147,442 0.667 3,642 Plane Slope Sectional Qtys Area Area Depth Volume FIELD 110,622 110,629 1.500 6,146 STADIUM/CONCOURSE 128,286 128,915 0.667 3,185 Sectional Total 238,908 239,544 9,331 11.25 10.50 9.75 9.00 8.25 7.50 6.75 6.00 5.25 4.50 3.75 3.00 2.25 1.50 0.75 ± .100 0.75 1.50 2.25 3.00 3.75 4.50 5.25 6.00 6.75 7.50 8.25 9.00 9.75 10.50 11.25NON-BROWNFIELD - FIELD FFE: 806
TMW-5
TMW-7
B-4
SB-15
SB-13
SB-19
SB-20
SB-23
SB-24
SB-25SB-26
SB-3
SB-4/TMW-2
SB-5
SB-7SB-8/TMW-4
SB-9
SB-10
B-1
B-2
SB-11
B-5B-3
SB-1/TMW-1
SB-2
SB-6/TMW-3
TMW-6
SB-17
SB-16
SB-14
SB-18
SB-18A
SB-21
SB-22
SB-12
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. KAN-012
DATE: 7-13-18
FIGURE NO. 5
PROPOSED BASEBALL STADIUM
OAK AVENUE & WELLNESS WAY
KANNAPOLIS, NORTH CAROLINA
CUT FILL OVERLAY
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELLLOCATION
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL/
SOIL BORING LOCATION
SOIL BORING LOCATION
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
S:\AAA-Master Projects\City of Kannapolis - KAN\KAN-012 Infrastructure, Streetscape, & Baseball Projects\Phase II ESA\Figures\Sample Location Map.dwg, CUT FILL OVERLAY, 7/13/2018 11:46:26 AM, erichardson

Appendix B
Redevelopment Schedule

Kannapolis Sports & Entertainment VenueDRAFT Summary Level Schedule

Appendix C
Export Site Information
48ST 48ST 48ST 48ST 48ST
12ST12ST48ST 48ST 48ST
16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W 16W
8W
8WWCAPWCAPWCAPWCAPWCAP
WCAPWCAP
WCAPWCAPWCAPWCAPWCAPWCAPWCAPWCAPSSSSSSSSSSSSSSFMSSSSGGGGGGG6W6W3W3WWWWW12W12W12W12W12W12W12W12W12W6RUWWWCAP
WCAPWCAPWCAP
WCAPWCAP
WCAPWCAP6WSSOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEWCAPWCAP6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G
6
G
6
G
6
G
6
G
6
G
6
G
6
G
6
G
6
G
6
GSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS6RU6RU6RU6RU6RU6RU6RU6RU6RU
8
R
U
8
R
U
8
R
U6G6GWCAPWCAP WCAP
6G
1
2W
1
2W
1
2W
SSSSSSSSSSSSSS6G 6G 6G6G 6G 6G 6G 6G 6G 6G 6G 6G 6G 6G 6G 6G 6GSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
SS SS SSSSSS6RU 6RU 6RU 6RU 6RU 6RU 6RU 6RU 6RU6W6WGG 6GGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASUG
C
U
G
C
U
G
C
W WWWWWWWWWWW8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 16SS16SS16SS16SS16SS16SS16SS16SS16SS16SS16SS16SS16SSOHE
OHE OHE OHE OHEW15
S
T
18
S
T
15ST15ST12ST12
S
T
12
S
T24ST18ST
18ST 18ST
15ST 15ST 15ST
12ST8SS10SS 10SS
15ST15ST8SS8SS8SS8SS8SS8SS8SS15ST
12ST8SS
8
S
S
8
S
S
24ST
24ST42ST 42ST 42ST 42ST
15ST
GATEGATEGATEW.E. 823.6W.E. 770.1OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X X X X X X XXXXCCSTSTSTSTST ST STSTSTSTSTST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST S
T
S
T
S
T
S
T
ST ST STST ST ST ST ST ST
S
TST
STST ST ST
S
T
S
T
S
T
S
T
STSTS
T
S
T
S
TSTST
STSTS
T
S
T
S
T
STUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGC
UGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGC6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6G6GWWUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGE UGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGEUGE6RU6RU6RU6RU6RU6RU6RU6RU6RU6RU6RU6RU6RU6RU6RU6RUSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
S
S
S
S
SSUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCU
G
C UGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGCUGC
UGCUGCUGCUGC
WWWWWWW
WWWWWWWWWWW15340'8888773794792791787
774775776779780783780
784
782
786786
782
780
777
782
785
783
791
787
787791
788 790
786
790 785
789 784
788 783
787
786785778783
777
775783820821822822821821819818819819818816 815 814 813 81281181080980880780680580479879779679
7
796
7
9
5794
7
9
3
7
9
2
7
9
1
7
9
0
7
8
5
77
9
7
8
0
77
5
7
7
1
770771772775
779
780
785
790
79
5
800806786768770
775
780
785
768770795802800
768770775783780774777781755770775780
784
785 7928208158108050800818816 816816815810805800 818819
806
809
770772775773775781
780785790
773772770768766
76
0 755
750
745
74
5
750
755
760
765
770
769805
809
810815
800
815
810798807804805
8038
0
1
802
803
802804
805
80680
7
809
808
80
9
8
0
8
8
06
8
05
80
4804806
809
810
815 819 8208058
0
6
80
3
80
2
801 800
799
805
804
799
799800804805800795790785780775770768757763772777778
79
5 796811810805800798786779774773775774 810805
8
0
0
7
95
79
8
797
80
2 804805817 815
810805800801802795798790790
785800
795
790
78
5 817809805815818
810
805801VICINITY MAPSCALE: N.T.S.LOOP ROAD(75' PUBLIC R/W)EX.SEDIMENT BASINTO BE FILLED IN(REFER TO CONSTRUCTIONSEQUENCING NOTE)NORTH CAROLINA RESEARCH CAMPUSCASTLE & COOKE NC LLC PROPERTYPIN: 56146292570000PARCEL# 5614N. LOOP ROADKANNAPOLIS NC, 28081EXISTING SANITARY SEWER(TO REMAIN)DIVERSION DITCH(REFER TO PROPOSED CHANNEL SECTION #1)NORTH AMERICAN GREEN SC250 EROSIONCONTROL MATTING OR APPROVED EQUAL SHALLBE USED TO STABILIZE CHANNEL ON SITEEXISTING STORM DRAINAGE(TO REMAIN)EXISTING RIP RAP(TO REMAIN)EXISTING HEADWALL(TO REMAIN)PROPOSED CHANNEL SECTION #1NOT TO SCALE2:12:110'6'10'5'DEPTH5'BERMTIE TO EX.GRADETIE TOPROPGRADELINED/STABILIZED CHANNELREVISIONS:DATE:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
Q.C. BY:
SHEET #:
SCALE:
PROJECT #:
223 N Graham Street Charlotte, NC 28202
V: 704.333.0325 F: 704.332.3246
www.LandDesign.com
TM
DOWNTOWN KANNAPOLIS
PHASE 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE & STREETSCAPE PROJECT
Kannapolis, NC | City of Kannapolis
06-19-2018
1016120
NC Engineering Firm License # C-0658
N:\_2016\1016120\CAD\Construction Documents\NCRC Erosion Plans\1016120 - NCRC Erosion Control Plan.dwg Jun 25, 2018 - 11:36am
Not for Construction
Issued for Construction
Issued for Bidding
Issued for Permit Approval0'25'25' 50'100'NCRC EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE I & II
MTGMTGARWNLD1" = 50'
C-4.5 PROJECT NARRATIVE:1. THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN THE YADKIN- PEE-DEE RIVER BASIN.2. THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF PHASE 1 AND 2 CONSTRUCTION.3. PHASE I INCLUDES CONSTRUCTION OF A TEMPORARY DIVERSIONDITCH AND TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING IN COMPLIANCE WITHNCDEQ (#6.20 & 6.70).4. PHASE II INCLUDES STOCKPILING OFFSITE SOILS WITH A VOLUMEOF APPROXIMATELY 41,000 CY.CONTACT INFORMATION:CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ALL EXISTING UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TOAND DURING CONSTRUCTION WITH REGARDS TO ANY CONFLICTS WITH EXISTINGUTILITIES ON SITE:PSNC ENERGY CONTACT: FRANKLIN S. CRAIG, P.E. EMAIL: [e-mail] PHONE: [phone]WINDSTREAM CONTACT: WAYNE CLEMONSEMAIL: [e-mail]: 704-722-2620SPECTRUM CONTACT: COLIN CARPENTEREMAIL: [e-mail]: 704-991-6502DUKE ENERGY CONTACT: MILTON THOMPSONEMAIL: [e-mail]: 704-395-4363PUBLIC WATER/SEWER WILMER MELTON, III, CITY OF KANNAPOLISCONTACT:EMAIL: [e-mail]: 704-920-4231BARTLETT TREE EXPERTS BRIAN S. FRIERSON, ARBORIST REPRESENTATIVECONTACT: EMAIL: [e-mail] PHONE: [phone]BARTON MALOW HALEY HASSLER, PRECONSTRUCTION MANAGERCONTACT: EMAIL: HALEY.HASSLER@BARTON MALOW.COM PHONE: [phone]SURVEY NOTES:1. BASE MAP DATA FROM CITY OF CHARLOTTE PLANAMETRICS, GIS TOPO,PARCEL DATA, AND FIELD SURVEY PREPARED BY LDSI DATED4-21-2017.2. VERTICAL UTILITY LOCATE INFORMATION COMPLETED BY LDSI DATED04-17-2017.DUKE ENERGY NOTE:1. DIG AROUND SERVICES IN CONDUIT WITH EASE2. CONTACT 1-800-POWER-ON IF CABLE IS DAMAGED3. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING DUKE MANHOLEDIMENSIONS AND COORDINATE W/ DUKE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION ANDCONNECTION OF PROPOSED DUCT BANK.FIBER OPTIC / COMMUNICATION LINES NOTE:1. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO EXERCISE CAUTION WHILE WORKING IN THEVICINITY OF INSTALLED FIBER OPTIC / COMMUNICATION LINES.2. IN THE EVENT CONFLICTS ARISE, CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ANDCOORDINATE WITH CITY INSPECTOR.3. CITY INSPECTOR TO COORDINATE WITH CITY UTILITY COORDINATORFOR RESOLUTION.MAITENANCE NOTE:1. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH WILMER MELTON, III, FOR THEUP KEEP AND MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES:WILMER MELTON, III, CITY OF KANNAPOLISEMAIL: [e-mail]: 704-920-4231GENERAL NOTES:1. ALL PROPERTY AFFECTED BY THIS WORK SHALL BE RESTORED TO ACONDITION EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN THE EXISTING UNLESS OTHERWISESPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY THESE PLANS.2. THE CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OFEXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDSOF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, PREVIOUS DESIGN DOCUMENTS, ANDWHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATIONIS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE LOCATION OFEXISTING UTILITIES MUST BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE CONTRACTORPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANDENGINEER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELDCONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SHALL WAIT FORINSTRUCTIONS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING.4. PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TOVERIFY THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEENOBTAINED FROM ALL REGULATORY AUTHORITIES AND SHALL BETHOROUGHLY FAMILIAR WITH CONDITIONS OF SAID PERMITS ANDINSPECTION REQUIREMENTS.5. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL OWNERS OF EASEMENTS,UTILITIES AND RIGHT-OF-WAYS, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, PRIOR TO WORKING INTHESE AREAS.6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DAMAGE TO ANY EXISTINGITEM AND/OR MATERIAL INSIDE OR OUTSIDE THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE SITE IN A MANNER SO THAT WORKMENAND PUBLIC ARE PROTECTED FROM INJURY.8. LANDDESIGN SHALL NOT BE IN CONTROL OR CHARGE OF, AND SHALL NOT BERESPONSIBLE FOR ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES,PROCEDURES, OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE WORK,OR FOR THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF CONTRACTORS OR ANY OTHERPERSONS NOT UNDER THE EMPLOYMENT OF LANDDESIGN.EROSION CONTROL NOTES:SOIL TYPES:CfB CECIL-URBAN LAND COMPLEX, 2 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPESCeB CECIL-URBAN LAND COMPLEX, 2 TO 10 PERCENT SLOPESPcC2 PACOLET SANDY CLAY LOAM, 8 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPESUr URBAN LAND1. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED INACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT N.C. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLPLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL (WEBSITE: HTTPS://DEQ.NC.GOV)2. ALL "STD." NUMBERS REFER TO THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OFENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3. ON-SITE BURIAL PITS REQUIRE AN ON-SITE DEMOLITION LANDFILL PERMITFROM THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR.4. ANY GRADING BEYOND THE DENUDED LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLAN IS ANVIOLATION OF THE STATE'S EROSION CONTROL STATUTES AND IS SUBJECTTO A FINE.5. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL MEASURES THROUGH DRYWEATHER PERIODS UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED.6. CONTRACTOR MAY NEED TO SPRAY DISTURBED AREA WITH WATER TOMAINTAIN DUST CONTROL AS NEEDED DURING DRY WEATHER PERIODS.REFER TO NCDEQ #6.84.7. GRADING MORE THAN ONE ACRE WITHOUT AN APPROVED EROSIONCONTROL PLAN IS A VIOLATION OF THE STATE'S EROSION CONTROLSTATUTES AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.8. STABILIZATION IS THE BEST FORM OF EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARYSEEDING IS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE EROSION CONTROL ON LARGEDENUDED AREAS AND ESPECIALLY WHEN SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED AS PARTOF THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE SHOWN ON THE PLAN.9. GROUND STABILIZATION MUST OCCUR WITHIN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETION OFGRADING ON PERIMETER AREAS AND ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1.GROUND STABILIZATION MUST OCCUR WITHIN 14 DAYS OF COMPLETION OFGRADING ON ALL OTHER AREAS OF THE PROJECT.10. ANY AREAS DISTURBED WHERE SEDIMENT CONTROL IS NOT FEASIBLE OREROSION WILL CAUSE SEDIMENT TO ENTER WATER COURSE (CREEK BANKS,CREEK BED, DISTURBED CHANNELS) MUST BE STABILIZED THE SAME DAYTHE AREA IS DISTURBED.11. ANY OFFSITE BORROW PITS, BURY PITS OR STOCKPILE AREAS MUST HAVEAN APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PERMIT.12. FAILURE TO SCHEDULE AN ON-SITE MEETING WITH THE STATE'S EROSIONCONTROL COORDINATOR 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBINGACTIVITY IS A VIOLATION OF STATE STATUTES AND IS SUBJECT TO FINE.13. ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT MAY BEREQUIRED BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY OF KANNAPOLISENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OR NCDEQ.14. ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY > 5 ACRES REQUIRES COMPLIANCE WITHALL CONDITIONS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORM WATERUNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM(PERMIT NO. NCG010000).15.TOTAL PROJECT DISTURBED AREA = 8.11 AC16. SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED NO STEEPER THAN 2:1, UNLESS DIRECTED BYTHE ENGINEER.17. SAND OR SCREENING SHOULD BE REQUIRED BENEATH EXCAVATEDMATERIAL THAT IS STOCKPILED ON STREETS OR PAVED SURFACES.18. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH CITY OF KANNAPOLIS & BARTLETT TREEEXPERTS (BRIAN FRIERSON) FOR TREE REMOVAL AND ADEQUATE TREEPROTECTION.EROSION CONTROL LEGENDTEMPORARY SILT FENCING (NCDEQ 6.62)DENUDED LIMITSCONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (NCDEQ 6.06)ROCK CHECK DAM (NCDEQ 6.83)(REFER TO SHEET C-4.6 FOR DETAILS)CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCEPHASE I1. CONTRACTOR TO SET UP AN ON-SITE PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITHNCQEQ EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR TO DISCUSS EROSION CONTROLMEASURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL A CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE TIRE WASH, SILT FENCE, AND TREE PROTECTION (NCDEQ #6.05)AS NEEDED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING ACTIVITIES.3. CONTRACTOR TO GRADE A DIVERSION DITCH AND MAINTAIN EXISTINGSTORM DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE, INCLUDING RIP-RAP, TO ADEQUATELYDIVERT RUNOFF FROM THE PROPOSED STOCKPILE LOCATION.4. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR EXISTING HEADWALL AS NEEDED. CONTRACTORTO COORDINATE WITH CITY OF KANNAPOLIS AND ENGINEER PRIOR TOHEADWALL REPAIR.5. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL A TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING PER NCDEQ#6.70, UTILIZING A 48" CMP FOR DRAINAGE, ACROSS PROPOSEDPERMANENT DIVERSION DITCH AS DEPICTED.6. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL ALL ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURESSHOWN ON THIS PLAN INCLUDING ROCK CHECK DAMS PRIOR TO PHASE IICONSTRUCTION.7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DILIGENTLY AND CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ALLEROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND STRUCTURES. ALL EROSION CONTROLMEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED AND CLEANED AFTER EVERY STORM EVENT.8. ALL STREETS SURROUNDING THE PROJECT SHALL REMAIN CLEAN ANDCLEAR OF DEBRIS AT ALL TIMES.9. AS THE CONTRACTOR COMPLETES DEMOLITION WORK, THE DISTURBEDAREA SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF GRADINGON PERIMETER AREAS AND ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1. GROUNDSTABILIZATION MUST OCCUR WITHIN 14 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF GRADINGAND ON ALL OTHER AREAS OF THE PROJECT. REFER TO STABILIZATIONTIMEFRAME SHOWN ON THIS SHEET.PHASE II1. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN EXISTING EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLMEASURES AS NOTED IN PHASE I CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING.2. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE TEMPORARY TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGPER NCDEQ #6.70 FOR ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED STOCKPILE LOCATION.3. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING SKIMMER AND OUTLET STRUCTURE.4. CONTRACTOR TO FILL EXISTING SEDIMENT BASIN. CONTRACTOR TO DUMPAND SPREAD SOIL IN LIFTS OF 1' INCREMENTS.5. CONTRACTOR TO PLACE GEOTEXTILE LINER OVER ENTIRE IMPORT AREA.CONTRACTOR TO CAP ARE ABY PLACING 2' OF APPROVED CLEAN OFFSITEIMPORT IN 1' LIFTS. THE FINAL 6" IS TO BE STABILIZED WITH VEGETATIVECOVER (± 10,000 CY)6. CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO FINAL GRADES SHOWN ON PLAN.7. CONTRACTOR TO SEED AND STABILIZE PER STABILIZATION TABLE SHOWNON C-4.6.8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DILIGENTLY AND CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ALLEROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND STRUCTURES. ALL EROSION CONTROLMEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED AND CLEANED AFTER EVERY STORM EVENT.9. ALL STREETS SURROUNDING THE PROJECT SHALL REMAIN CLEAN ANDCLEAR OF DEBRIS AT ALL TIMES.10. AS THE CONTRACTOR COMPLETES DEMOLITION WORK, THE DISTURBEDAREA SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF GRADINGON PERIMETER AREAS AND ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1. GROUNDSTABILIZATION MUST OCCUR WITHIN 14 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF GRADINGAND ON ALL OTHER AREAS OF THE PROJECT. REFER TO STABILIZATIONTIMEFRAME SHOWN ON THIS SHEET.CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCETIRE WASH (CLDS 30.11B)FO
R
E
S
T

A
V
E
LOOP ROAD
(75' PUBLIC R/W)LAUREATE WAY(VARIABLE PUBLIC R/W)CHARLES BABBAGE LANEEXISTING PARKING LOT(TO REMAIN)PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(NCDEQ 6.06) LOCATIONLAT. = 35.503690°LONG. = -80.625736°PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCETIRE WASH (CLDS 30.11B)PROPOSED (1) TEMPORARY 48" CMP @1.00 MINIMUM SLOPETEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING(NCDEQ #6.70)BIOTECHNOLOGY LANE(VARIABLE PUBLIC R/W)
B
IO
T
E
C
H
NO
L
OG
Y

L
A
N
E
(
V
A
R
I
A
B
L
E

P
U
B
L
I
C

R
/W
)EXISTING 60" RCP STORMDRAINAGE (TO REMAIN)DENUDED LIMITS (TYP.)PROPOSED DOUBLE ROW SILT FENCE(NCDEQ #6.62) (TYP.)PROPOSED SILT FENCE(NCDEQ #6.62) (TYP.)EXISTING HEADWALL(TO REMAIN)EXISTING HEADWALL(TO REMAIN)EX. 60" RCP STORM DRAINAGESYSTEM (TO REMAIN)EX BUILDING (TO REMAIN)PROPOSED HAUL ROUTE (TYP.)NOTENORTH AMERICAN GREEN SC250EROSION CONTROL MATTING ORAPPROVED EQUAL SHALL BE USEDTO STABILIZE CHANNEL ON SITECONTRACTOR TO PLACE GEOTEXTILE LINER OVERENTIRE IMPORT AREA. CONTRACTOR TO CAP AREABY PLACING 2' OF APPROVED CLEAN OFFSITEIMPORT IN 1' LIFTS. THE FINAL 6" IS TO BESTABILIZED WITH VEGETATIVE COVER (± 10,000 CY)PROPOSED GEOTEXTILE LINER WITH 2'OF CLEAN IMPORT CAPPING SOIL (± 10,000 CY) BROWNFIELD AGREEMENT NOTE :THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO A BROWNFIELD AGREEMENT.ALL WORK WITHIN THESE PROJECT LIMITS ARE TO BE CARRIEDOUT IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS.E
X
.

8
"

P
V
C

S
S
EX. 8" PVC SSEX. 48" RCP STORM DRAINAGESYSTEM (TO REMAIN)
REVISIONS:DATE:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
Q.C. BY:
SHEET #:
SCALE:
PROJECT #:
223 N Graham Street Charlotte, NC 28202
V: 704.333.0325 F: 704.332.3246
www.LandDesign.com
TM
DOWNTOWN KANNAPOLIS
PHASE 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE & STREETSCAPE PROJECT
Kannapolis, NC | City of Kannapolis
06-19-2018
1016120
NC Engineering Firm License # C-0658
N:\_2016\1016120\CAD\Construction Documents\NCRC Erosion Plans\1016120 - NCRC Erosion Control Plan.dwg Jun 25, 2018 - 9:58am
Not for Construction
Issued for Construction
Issued for Bidding
Issued for Permit Approval
NCRC EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
MTGMTGARWNLDN.T.S.
C-4.6 EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2010, PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR LAND DISTURBINGACTIVITIES MUST INSPECT A PROJECT AFTER EACH PHASE OF THE PROJECTTO MAKE SURE THAT THE APPROVED EROSION EROSION CONTROL ANDSEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN IS BEING FOLLOWED. SELF-INSPECTIONREPORTS ARE REQUIRED. A SAMPLE SELF-INSPECTION REPORT, AS WELL ASDETAILS OF THE SELF-INSPECTION PROGRAM, CAN BE FOUND ON THE LANDQUALITY WEB SITE:HTTP://WWW.DLR.ENR.STATE.NC.US/PAGES/SEDIMENTAION_NEW.HTMLNOT EVERY PROJECT WILL HAVE ALL POSSIBLE PHASES, BUT A LIST OFPHASES INCLUDE: (1) INSTALLATION OF PERIMETER EROSION AND SEDIMENTCONTROL MEASURES (2) INSTALLATION OF SEDIMENT TRAPS/BASINS. (3)CLEARING AND GRUBBING EXISTING GROUND COVER.NOTE:1. NO STREAM/WETLAND IMPACTS MAY BE PERFORMED UNTIL ALL APPLICABLE PERMITSHAVE BEEN RECEIVED BY THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND NCDEQ.2. ADEQUATE TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE END OFEACH WORK DAY AT ALL STREAM CROSSINGS UNTIL ADEQUATE PERMANENT GROUNDCOVER IS PROVIDED.3. STAGING AREAS AND STOCKPILES MUST BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE STREAM BUFFERZONE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. WORK WITHIN THE STREAM BUFFER SHOULD BESEQUENCED TO MINIMIZE THE LENGTH OF TIME THAT DISTURBED AREAS ARE TOEXPOSED. ALL MATERIALS MUST BE ON HAND BEFORE WORK IS COMMENCED. STREAMBANK STABILIZATION, WHICH INCLUDES THE AREA FROM THE EDGE OF WATER TO THETOP OF BANK, SHOULD BE PHASED SO THAT EACH DAY'S WORK IS COMPLETED ANDADEQUATELY STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY.MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE:1). ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES SHALL BE CHECKED FORSTABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY STORM EVENT, BUT IN NOCASE LESS THAN ONCE EVERY WEEK. ANY REPAIRS OR CLEANINGNECESSARY TO MAINTAIN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICESSHALL BE COMPLETED IMMEDIATELY.2). ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE REFERTILIZED, RESEEDED AS NECESSARY, ANDMULCHED ACCORDING TO THE SEEDING SCHEDULE.3.) MONITORING OF EROSION CONTROL AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLMEASURES IS REQUIRED AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK OR AFTER EVERY HALFINCH OF RAINFALL.NOT TO SCALENCDEQ 6.06GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE1C-4.64C-4.63'-0"3'-0"6" BARK MULCH, PLACE 3'-0"3'-0"FOR GENERAL SPECIFICATION REGARDING TREE PROTECTION.3. REFER TO CITY OF KANNAPOLIS CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS 1. REMOVE ALL BARRIERS UPON COMPLETION OF PROJECT.2. LANDSCAPING PLANS SHALL SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCES.NATIONAL ARBORISTFOR PRUNING SEE2"x4" STANDARDS + 1"x4" RAILSOR SMALLERFOR 2" CAL. TREES NOTES:OR ORANGE SAFETY FENCINGMAY BE USED. OR 1/2 HEIGHT OF TREEWHICHEVER IS GREATERASSOCIATION SPECS.PLAN VIEW OF ROOT ZONEDRIP LINEREMOVALTREE LIMBPROTECTED BY BARRIER.BARK MULCH AT AREAS NOTALLOWED UNDER DRIP LINE.ADJACENT GRADE. NO GRUBBINGGROWTH SHALL BE CUT FLUSH WITH DEAD TREES AND SCRUB OR UNDER6' MINIMUM WIDTHINCH OF TRUNK DIAMETERONE FOOT FOR EACH2C-4.6CROSS SECTIONGENERAL NOTES:1. RIPRAP SIZE TO BE DESIGNED BY ENGINEER.1'-6" MIN.CLASS B RIP RAP# 5 WASHED STONE FLOW2. CHECK DAMS MAY BE USED IN SLOPING DITCHESOR CHANNELS TO SLOW VELOCITY OR TO CREATESEDIMENT TRAPS.MAXIMUM SPACING3.ENSURE THAT MAXIMUM SPACING BETWEEN DAMS PLACES THETOE OF THE UPSTREAM DAM AT THE SAME ELEVATION AS THEDOWNSTREAM DAM (SEE DIAGRAM BELOW).ABA AND B ARE AT EQUAL ELEVATIONS2' MAXAT CENTER214' TO 6'9" MIN.FILTER CLOTH1'-6" MIN.PLANNOT TO SCALETEMPORARY ROCK CHECK DAM9. PREFABRICATED SILT FENCE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.FILTER FABRIC8"6. DO NOT ATTACH FABRIC TO EXISTING TREES.2. DEPTH OF WATER BEHIND FENCE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.5 FEET.8. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE ADEQUATE STORAGE7. INSPECT FENCES WEEKLY AND AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS. REPAIRS SHALL BE5. IF WIRE MESH IS USED, FENCE POST SPACING MAY BE 8' MAXIMUM.4. CONSTRUCT FENCE FROM A CONTINUOUS ROLL. JOINTS SHALL OVERLAP BY3. FOR REINFORCEMENT OF FABRIC, USE 14 GAUGE MESH WITH 6" SPACING.1. DRAINAGE AREA SHALL BE LESS THAN 1/4 ACRE PER 100 FEET OF FENCE. 4' MINIMUM. VOLUMES. MADE IMMEDIATELY.4' MAX.1.5' MAX.SLOPEFENCE IS APPLICABLESLOPE FOR WHICH SEDIMENTMAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTH ANDCOMPACTED FILLSLOPE LENGTH (ft.) 15 25 50 75100>20%<2%10 TO 20%5 TO 10%2 TO 5%SPECIFICATIONS FORSEDIMENT FENCE FABRIC85% (MIN.)REQUIREMENTS30 LB./LIN. INCH (MIN.)STANDARD STRENGTH-50 LB./LIN.IN (MIN.)EXTRA STRENGTH-0.3 GAL/SQ. FT/MIN (MIN.)PHYSICAL PROPERTY20% (MAX.) ELONGATIONTENSILE STRENGTH ATFILTERING EFFICIENCYSLURRY FLOW RATEGENERAL NOTES:WIRE4"OR BURIED OR DRIVEN TO1.33 LB/LF STEEL POST BURIEDDEPTH OF 18" IN THE GROUNDNOT TO SCALENCDEQ 6.62SEDIMENT FENCE (SILT FENCE)PUBLIC ROADGENERAL NOTES:1. A STABILIZED PAD OF CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE LOCATED WHERE TRAFFIC WILL BE ENTERING OR LEAVING A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO OR FROM A PUBLIC STREET.2. STONE TO BE 2 - 3 INCH WASHED STONE.3. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS OR EXISTING PAVEMENT. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR AND/OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT.4. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC STREETS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.5. WHEN NECESSARY WHEELS MUST BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTERING A PUBLIC STREET, WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN.6. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED UNDER THE ENTRANCE/EXIT AND SHALL BE MIRAFI 500 OR EQUAL.NOT TO SCALENCDEQ 6.05TREE PROTECTION5C-4.66C-4.6NOT TO SCALECLDS 30.11BCONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TIRE WASH3C-4.6MIN 6" PVC PIPE TO SEDIMENT TRAPCOLLECTION PIT
ANGLE IRON3" TUBE STEEL2-3" OF WASHED STONE STD. 30.11AWATER SUPPLY6" PIPESEDMENT TRAPA
ASTD. 30.11A2-3" OF WASHED STONE NOTE: MAY BE USED WHERE EXTENSIVEHAULING WILL BE DONE.18' MIN.
18"TREE PROTECTION NOTES:1) NO SOIL DISTURBANCE OR COMPACTION, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, TRAFFIC, BURIAL PITS, TRENCHING OR OTHER LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITYALLOWED IN THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE.2) TREE BARRICADES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE ANY DEMOLITION, GRADING OR CONSTRUCTION BEGINS, AND NOT REMOVED UNTIL FINALINSPECTION.3) TREE PROTECTION BARRICADES MUST MEET OR EXCEED TREE ORDINANCE STANDARDS4) NO GRUBBING WITHIN TREE PROTECTION ZONE. LEAVE SOIL AND LEAF LITTER UNDISTURBED. SUPPLEMENT WITH 1-2 INCHES OF MULCH. RE-SEEDWITH GRASS ONLY IN DISTURBED/GRADED AREAS.5) BRUSH, VINES, AND SMALL TREES (<8IN DIA., OR AS SMALL 2IN CAL) MAY BE HAND CLEARED ONLY, CUT FLUSH WITH GROUND SURFACE. EXISTINGTREES MAY BE LIMBED UP 6 FT LEAVING AT LEAST 2/3 OF THE BRANCHES TO IMPROVE VISIBILITY.6) EXPOSED TREE ROOTS MUST BE CLEANLY CUT WITH A SHARP PRUNING TOOL; BACKFILL ASAP TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE TO AIR.7) TREE BARRICADES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE ANY DEMOLITION/CLEARING/GRADING/CONSTRUCTION/, AND NOT REMOVED UNTIL AFTER FINALINSPECTION BY URBAN FORESTER.GRASS SEED SHALL BE DROUGHT RESISTANT TALL FESCUE AND/ORPERENNIAL RYE UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANT LIST.NEW VARIETIES WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR REVIEW. SEED SHALL HAVE A97% MINIMUM PURITY AND 85% MINIMUM GERMINATION, AND BE FREE OFNOXIOUS WEED SEEDS, AS CERTIFIED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA CO-OPIMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION OR ITS APPROVED EQUIVALENT BY THECONSULTANT.SEASONTYPE OF SEEEDDATETALL FESCUESEEDING SPECIFICATIONSPERENNIAL RYEFALLWINTERSPRING / SUMMERSEP 1 - NOV 15NOV 15 - MARCH 1SEEDING NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS:PERENNIALRYERATE7 LBS/1,000 SF5 LBS/1,000 SF7 LBS/1,000 SFBLEND OF TWO TURFTYPE TALL FESCUE.WITH RYE GRAINCOVER CROPMARCH 1 - SEP 15 LBS/1,000 SFNOTES:PIPES SIZE TO CARRYBANK FULL FLOWDUCTILE IRON, CMPOR RCP ONLYCLASS BEROSION STONEFILTER FABRICNC DOT #5 OR#57 WASHED STONENC DOT #5 OR#57 WASHED STONEMIN 12" OR 12PIPE DIAMETERCLASS BEROSION STONE2-72" 1STREAM CROSSING(INCHES)PIPE SIZETEMPORARY2-48" 2NOT TO SCALENCDEQ 6.70.1TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING1. SLOPE APPROACHES TO CROSSING 2:1 OR FLATTER.2. SPILLWAY LENGTH = BANK TO BANK WIDTH OF STREAMOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.3. PIPE TO EXTEND 1' BEYOND LIMITS OF RIP-RAP4. REMOVE TEMPORAR STREAM CROSSING IMMEDIATELYWHEN THEY ARE NO LONGER NEEDED.EROSION CONTROL NOTES:1. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED INACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT N.C. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLPLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL (WEBSITE: HTTPS://DEQ.NC.GOV)2. ALL "STD." NUMBERS REFER TO THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OFENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.3. ON-SITE BURIAL PITS REQUIRE AN ON-SITE DEMOLITION LANDFILL PERMITFROM THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR.4. ANY GRADING BEYOND THE DENUDED LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLAN IS ANVIOLATION OF THE STATE'S EROSION CONTROL STATUTES AND IS SUBJECTTO A FINE.5. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL MEASURES THROUGH DRYWEATHER PERIODS UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED.6. CONTRACTOR MAY NEED TO SPRAY DISTURBED AREA WITH WATER TOMAINTAIN DUST CONTROL AS NEEDED DURING DRY WEATHER PERIODS.REFER TO NCDEQ #6.84.7. GRADING MORE THAN ONE ACRE WITHOUT AN APPROVED EROSIONCONTROL PLAN IS A VIOLATION OF THE STATE'S EROSION CONTROLSTATUTES AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.8. STABILIZATION IS THE BEST FORM OF EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARYSEEDING IS NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE EROSION CONTROL ON LARGEDENUDED AREAS AND ESPECIALLY WHEN SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED AS PARTOF THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE SHOWN ON THE PLAN.9. GROUND STABILIZATION MUST OCCUR WITHIN 7 DAYS OF COMPLETION OFGRADING ON PERIMETER AREAS AND ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1.GROUND STABILIZATION MUST OCCUR WITHIN 14 DAYS OF COMPLETION OFGRADING ON ALL OTHER AREAS OF THE PROJECT.10. ANY AREAS DISTURBED WHERE SEDIMENT CONTROL IS NOT FEASIBLE OREROSION WILL CAUSE SEDIMENT TO ENTER WATER COURSE (CREEK BANKS,CREEK BED, DISTURBED CHANNELS) MUST BE STABILIZED THE SAME DAYTHE AREA IS DISTURBED.11. ANY OFFSITE BORROW PITS, BURY PITS OR STOCKPILE AREAS MUST HAVEAN APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PERMIT.12. FAILURE TO SCHEDULE AN ON-SITE MEETING WITH THE STATE'S EROSIONCONTROL COORDINATOR 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBINGACTIVITY IS A VIOLATION OF STATE STATUTES AND IS SUBJECT TO FINE.13. ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT MAY BEREQUIRED BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY OF KANNAPOLISENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OR NCDEQ.14. ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY > 5 ACRES REQUIRES COMPLIANCE WITHALL CONDITIONS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORM WATERUNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM(PERMIT NO. NCG010000).15.TOTAL PROJECT DISTURBED AREA = 8.11 AC16. SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED NO STEEPER THAN 2:1, UNLESS DIRECTED BYTHE ENGINEER.17. SAND OR SCREENING SHOULD BE REQUIRED BENEATH EXCAVATEDMATERIAL THAT IS STOCKPILED ON STREETS OR PAVED SURFACES.18. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH CITY OF KANNAPOLIS & BARTLETT TREEEXPERTS (BRIAN FRIERSON) FOR TREE REMOVAL AND ADEQUATE TREEPROTECTION. BROWNFIELD AGREEMENT NOTE :THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO A BROWNFIELD AGREEMENT.ALL WORK WITHIN THESE PROJECT LIMITS ARE TO BE CARRIEDOUT IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS.