HomeMy WebLinkAbout15035_Sun Chemical_IAS reportIndoor Air Sampling Report
Sun Chemical FacilitySun Chemical Facility
1701 Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No 15035 11 60BrownfieldsProject No. 15035-11-60
H&H Job No. PPA-038
February 28, 2012
2923 South Tryon Street
S ite 100Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
704-586-0007
3334 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-847-4241
#C-1269 Engineering
#C-245 Geology
Via E-mail
February 28, 2012 North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Brownfields Section 1646 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1646
Attention: Ms. Carolyn Minnich
Re: Indoor Air Sampling Report Sun Chemical Facility
1701 Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 15035-11-60 H&H Job No. PPA-038
Dear Carolyn:
1.0 Introduction
On behalf of Selwyn Property Group Investments, LLC, Hart & Hickman, P.C. (H&H) is
presenting this report of indoor air sampling for the Sun Chemical facility located at 1701
Westinghouse Blvd. in Charlotte, North Carolina. In November and December 2011, H&H
conducted a Brownfields site assessment which included soil, groundwater, and subslab soil
vapor sampling. As part of the assessment activities, eight subslab soil vapor samples were
collected from below the site buildings. The locations of the soil vapor samples, labeled SV-1
through SV-8, are indicated in Figure 1. Results of analysis of the subslab samples indicated the
presence of tetrachloroethene (PCE) and/or 1,2,4-trimethlybenzene (1,2,4-TMB) at
concentrations above the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(DENR) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) commercial/industrial soil vapor screening
levels in samples collected below the northern warehouse (SV-2), the western manufacturing
area (SV-3), the office area (SV-5), and the maintenance building (SV-8).
Ms. Carolyn Minnich
February 28, 2012
Page 2
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Parker Poe Adams (PPA)\PPA-038 sun chemical selwyn group\Brownfields Assessment\Indoor Air Assessment\Sun Chem IAS report.doc
H&H recommended that indoor air samples be collected from those areas with subslab soil vapor
samples above screening levels to determine if compound concentrations are present in indoor
air at levels of potential concern. A work plan for the indoor air sampling was submitted to
DENR on January 6, 2012, and DENR approved the work plan in a letter dated January 12,
2012.
The methods, results, and conclusions of the of the indoor air sampling are presented below.
2.0 Facility Information
The facility has historically been used for ink production. The facility is occupied by Sun
Chemical which recently shut down ink production. Activities being conducted at the facility at
this time include shipping raw materials and finished inks from the facility and plant
decommissioning. The laboratory in the northeastern portion of the building is still being used
for small batch formulation and testing of ink products.
The two warehouse buildings and the manufacturing area have ventilation systems which are
used to draw in fresh air because these areas of the facility are or were used for storage and
manufacture of flammable materials. The office and laboratory areas and maintenance building
have standard heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. In addition, the
laboratory area has bench-top ventilation systems which draw air out of the laboratory.
H&H contacted Sun Chemical to determine if any of the compounds for which the indoor air
samples were analyzed are suspected to be present in chemicals or products that may be stored or
used at the facility. Based upon their review, Sun Chemical indicated that it does not purchase or
store any of the compounds for which the indoor air samples were analyzed.
Ms. Carolyn Minnich
February 28, 2012
Page 3
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Parker Poe Adams (PPA)\PPA-038 sun chemical selwyn group\Brownfields Assessment\Indoor Air Assessment\Sun Chem IAS report.doc
3.0 Indoor Air Sampling and Analysis
In accordance with the approved work plan, H&H collected six indoor air samples and one
background sample at the site on January 19, 2012. The locations of the samples are indicated in
Figure 1 and a description of the sample locations is provided below:
• IAS-1 was collected from the northern warehouse building where PCE and 1,2,4-TMB
were detected above the commercial/industrial soil vapor screening levels during subslab
vapor sampling activities.
• IAS-2, IAS-3, and IAS-5 were collected from the office and laboratory areas where PCE
was detected above the soil vapor screening level during subslab vapor sampling
activities. IAS-2 was collected in an office in the northern portion of the office area
(labeled office 216), IAS-3 was collected inside the training/conference of the office area
(labeled room 213), and IAS-5 was collected from western portion of the laboratory area
(labeled lab area 129).
• IAS-4 was collected from the western portion of the manufacturing area where 1,2,4-
TMB was detected above the soil vapor screening level in previous sampling.
• IAS-6 was collected from the maintenance building where PCE was detected above the
screening level during previous sampling.
• A background sample (BAS-1) was collected from the exterior southeastern portion of a
background location upwind of the site building. Based on the general wind direction for
that day (east and southeast), BAS-1 was placed in the southeast corner of the site
property
The indoor air and background samples were collected with stainless steel 6-liter Summa
canisters. The Summa canisters were connected to an airflow regulator that regulated the air
intake to collect a sample over an approximate eight hour sample time and a 3 ft long sampling
Ms. Carolyn Minnich
February 28, 2012
Page 4
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Parker Poe Adams (PPA)\PPA-038 sun chemical selwyn group\Brownfields Assessment\Indoor Air Assessment\Sun Chem IAS report.doc
cane. The 3 ft long sampling cane was connected to the Summa canister in order to collect the
sample at a total height of approximately 5 ft above grade (typical breathing zone height). A
sampling cane was not used for sample location IAS-5 because the Summa canister was placed
on top of a laboratory bench.
The indoor air samples were collected during a regular work day. All HVAC systems and
ventilation systems were operating normally. Doors and dock doors were kept closed during the
sampling event, except doors that were normally opened and closed as part of regular workday
activities. Photographs of the sample locations are provided in Appendix A.
As part of the sampling effort, H&H measured the office area/outdoor air pressure differential in
each unit, warehouse, and office space near the start, middle, and end of the 8-hour sampling
period using a manometer sensitive to 0.01 inches water. In addition, exterior wind speed,
exterior wind direction, and indoor/outdoor temperature were recorded near the start, middle, and
end of the sampling period. Results of the differential pressure measurements and weather
conditions are recorded on Table 1.
Following sample collection, the Summa canisters were shipped to Con-Test Laboratories under
standard chain-of-custody protocol. In accordance with the work plan, the samples were
analyzed for PCE, trichloroethylene (TCE), cis-1,2-dichlororethylene (cis-1,2-DCE), vinyl
chloride, and 1,2,4-TMB by EPA Method TO-15. A copy of the laboratory report and chain-of-
custody is included in Appendix B.
Ms. Carolyn Minnich
February 28, 2012
Page 5
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Parker Poe Adams (PPA)\PPA-038 sun chemical selwyn group\Brownfields Assessment\Indoor Air Assessment\Sun Chem IAS report.doc
4.0 Results and Conclusions
Field measurements collected during the sampling event indicate a slight negative pressure inside
the buildings as compared to outside the building in most of the areas where indoor sampling
was conducted. The greatest differential pressure was in the laboratory where there are bench
top exhaust fans to outdoor air which is likely contributing the slight negative pressure inside this
area. Exterior temperatures during the sampling event were in the range of 44 to 48 oF.
The results of analysis of the indoor air samples are summarized in Table 2. Low concentrations
of PCE ranging from 0.12 µg/m3 to 1.2 µg/m3 were detected in the indoor air samples. PCE was
detected in the background sample at a concentration of 0.11 µg/m3, and the detections in IAS-1,
IAS-2, IAS-3, and IAS-4 were all similar to the background level. The detected PCE
concentrations are below the IHSB Industrial/Commercial screening level of 2.1 µg/m3 which is
calculated based upon a conservative lifetime incremental cancer risk (LICR) of 1 x 10-6. TCE
was detected in sample IAS-6 (maintenance building) only at a concentration of 0.65 µg/m3
which is below the screening level of 1.76 µg/m3 (also based upon a LICR of 1 x 10-6). The PCE
and TCE detections are significantly below the IHSB screening levels based upon a LICR of 1 x
10-4. Vinyl chloride and cis-1,2-DCE were not detected in any of the samples.
Low concentrations of 1,2,4-TMB were detected in each of the indoor air samples at
concentrations ranging from 0.13 µg/m3 to 2.5 µg/m3. 1,2,4-TMB was also detected in the
background sample at a concentration of 0.1 µg/m3, and the 1,2,4-TMB concentrations in
samples IAS-1, IAS-2, IAS-3, and IAS-4 were similar to the background level. The detected
1,2,4-TMB concentrations are below the IHSB Industrial/Commercial screening level of 6.2
µg/m3 which is based upon a non-carcinogenic hazard index of 0.2.
In summary, no compounds were detected in indoor air above DENR conservative screening
levels. DENR Brownfields typically does not request further assessment of the vapor intrusion
pathway if detected compound concentrations are below the most conservative screening levels.
Based upon the indoor air sampling results and because the sampling was conducted in the
Ms. Carolyn Minnich
February 28, 2012
Page 6
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Parker Poe Adams (PPA)\PPA-038 sun chemical selwyn group\Brownfields Assessment\Indoor Air Assessment\Sun Chem IAS report.doc
winter when higher levels of indoor air concentrations may occur, H&H recommends no further
evaluation of vapor intrusion in the site buildings.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact me. We look forward to your
approval of this report and completion of the Brownfields agreement for this site.
Very truly yours,
Hart & Hickman, PC
Steven C. Hart, PG
Principal
cc: Pat Pierce – Selwyn Property Investment Group
Tom Griffin – Parker Poe
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Parker Poe Adams (PPA)\PPA-038 sun chemical selwyn group\Brownfields Assessment\Indoor Air Assessment\Tables 2012-01-27 IAS.xlsxTables 2012-01-27 IAS.xlsx
Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Time
Temperature
oF
Differential
Pressure
(in Water)
Temperature
oF
Wind
Direction
Wind
Speed
(mph)
Precipitation
(inches)
9:20 NA NA 40 SE-E 5 None
12:00 NA NA 44 E-SE 5 None
15:00 NA NA 48 S-SW 3 None
Beginning 66.7 0.000
Middle 67 -0.003
End 65 -0.005
Beginning 70 -0.015
Middle 72 -0.017
End 72 -0.017
Beginning 70 -0.015
Middle 72 -0.017
End 72 -0.017
Beginning 67 0.000
Middle 68 0.004
End 68 -0.027
Beginning 71 -0.021
Middle 71 -0.027
End 71 -0.023
Beginning 67 -0.005
Middle 65 0.000
End 67 -0.004
Notes:
Information from on-site weather station set up at southeast corner of site property by H&H on January 19, 2012 during indoor air sampling event.
Negative Differential Pressure denotes higher pressure outside building
Differential pressure and temperature readings taken from each sample location at the beginning, middle, and end during the 8-hour sample collection
NA = Not Applicable
mph = miles per hour
Conference Room
IAS-1
Table 1
Sun Chemical Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PPA-038
Indoor and Outdoor Air Monitoring Data
Outdoor
BAS-1 South East Property
Boundary- Outdoor
IAS-5
IAS-6
Office
Manufacturing
Laboratory
Maintenance
IAS-3
IAS-4
Sample ID Sample Location
Indoor
Warehouse
IAS-2
Table 2 (Page 1 of 1)
Summary of Indoor Air Analytical Data
Sun Chemical Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina
Hart & Hickman Project No. PPA-038
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Parker Poe Adams (PPA)\PPA-038 sun chemical selwyn group\Brownfields Assessment\Indoor Air Assessment\Tables 2012-01-27 IAS.xlsxTables 2012-01-27 IAS.xlsx
Table 2 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PCcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneTetrachloroethyleneTrichloroethylene1,2,4-TrimethylbenzeneVinyl ChlorideIAS-1 Northern Warehouse 01/19/12 TO-15 <0.070 0.21 J <0.19 0.21 <0.090
IAS-2 Office Area 01/19/12 TO-15 <0.070 0.16 J <0.19 0.16 J <0.090
IAS-3 Office Area 01/19/12 TO-15 <0.070 0.12 J <0.19 0.13 J <0.090
IAS-4 Western Manufacturing 01/19/12 TO-15 <0.070 0.13 J <0.19 0.23 <0.090
IAS-5 Laboratory 01/19/12 TO-15 <0.070 1.2 <0.19 0.62 <0.090
IAS-6 Maintenance Building 01/19/12 TO-15 <0.070 0.79 0.65 2.5 <0.090
BAS-1 Exterior Background (Southeast Property Boundary)01/19/12 TO-15 <0.070 0.11 J <0.19 0.10 J <0.090
NE 2.1 1.76 6.2 2.8
NE 210 176 31 280
Notes:
Screening Levels from table dated Janaury 2012
IHSB = Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
LICR = Lifetime Incrcemental Cancer Risk; HI = Non-carcinogenic Hazard Index
J flag indicates compound was detected below the reporting limit. Listed value is estimated.Sample IDIHSB Industrial/Commercial Indoor Air Screening Concentration
(Based upon LICR of 1 x 10-6 and HI of 0.2)
NE = Not Established, µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
TO-15 Method abbreviated to report only the compounds listed aboveSample LocationSampling Date Analytical Methodµg/m3
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Indoor Air Screening Concentration
(Based upon LICR of 1 x 10-4 and HI of 1)
Appendix A Photographs
Photograph 1: IAS-1 in northern warehouse.
Photograph 2: IAS-2 in office area.FPG-002SUN CHEMICAL
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
Photograph 3: IAS-3 in office area conference room.FPG-002SUN CHEMICAL
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
Photograph 4: IAS-4 in western manufacturing area.
Photograph 5: IAS-5 in laboratory.FPG-002SUN CHEMICAL
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
Photograph 6: IAS-6 in maintenance building.
Photograph 7: Background sample BAS-1 in southeast portion of site.FPG-002SUN CHEMICAL
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
Appendix B Laboratory Analytical Data