Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout22062_Smokey Hollow 2_DM_20190809DECISION MEMORANDUM DATE: August 9, 2019 FROM: Sharon Eckard, PG TO: BF Assessment File RE: Smokey Hollow 2 Former addresses 413 N. Harrington Street, and 0, 506, 516, 520 & 524 N. West Street Raleigh, Wake County Brownfields Project #22062-18-092 Based on the following information, it has been determined that the above referenced site, whose intended use is for no uses other than as office, retail, high -density residential, and associated recreational space and parking, and subject to DEQ's prior written approval, other commercial uses. Introduction: The Brownfields Property was formerly comprised of six parcels totaling 3.57 acres. Parcels 1 through 6 had been assigned Parcel ID Nos. 1704512292,1704511285, 1704512404, 1704511469, 1704511562, and 1704512525, and the addresses 413 N. Harrington Street, 506 N. West Street, 516 N. West Street, 520 N. West Street, 0 N. West Street, and 524 N. West Street, respectively. As the result of a recombination of these parcels effective June 3, 2019, the Brownfields Property consists of two parcels totaling 3.47 acres and has been assigned Parcel ID Nos. 1704512232 and 1704513421, and the addresses 500 N. West Street, and 421 N. Harrington Street, respectively. The recombination also included minor corrections and the transfer of approximately 0.08 acres from these parcels to the N. West Street and N. Harrington Street public right-of- ways. In addition, the original Parcel lwas formerly comprised of three parcels with the addresses 413, 441, & 447 N. Harrington Street. That portion of the Brownfields Property is subject to a prior Brownfields Agreement (BF Project No. 20031-16-092), which was recorded on January 6, 2017 (Wake County Registry of Deeds, Book 016661, Page 01312). This Brownfields Agreement supersedes the original Brownfields Agreement for Parcel 1 (413 N. Harrington Street) previously recorded in 2017 as referenced above (Brownfields Project No. 20031-16-092), and replaces those land use restrictions respective to these parcels with those provided in paragraph 15 of the Brownfields Agreement for this property. It is the intent of DEQ and the co-PDs that the execution and recordation of this Agreement between DEQ and the co-PDs shall not in any way impact any other person's existing liability protection under the Brownfields Property Reuse Act and previously entered Brownfields Agreements. Specifically, this Agreement shall not alter the existing liability protection of any applicable person identified in Section 130A-310.33 of the Brownfields Property Reuse Act as provided by the respective agreement attached as Exhibit A to the Harrington Street Notice of Brownfields Property that was originally recorded on January 6, 2017 at the Wake County Registry of Deeds (Book 016661, Page 01312). Under that Notice of Brownfields Property, Land Use Restriction No. 2, which required that development activities be conducted under a DEQ-approved Environmental Management Plan (EMP), has been complied with for grading and other work done on the Brownfields Property prior to the effective date of this agreement. Redevelopment Plans: The Prospective Developer is comprised of four entities, each controlled by the management, and operating as co -Prospective Developers (co-PDs) with joint and several liability. The co -Prospective Developers are WK Smokey Hollow, LLC, WK Smokey Hollow 2, LLC, WK Smokey Hollow 3, LLC, and WK Smokey Hollow 4, LLC; these entities are each manager -managed limited liability corporations registered in North Carolina on January 8, 2016, December 8, 2017, March 26, 2018, and June 28, 2018, respectively. The principal address of the co-PDs is 4321 Lassiter at North Hills, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609. WK Smokey Hollow, LLC, WK Smokey Hollow 2, LLC, WK Smokey Hollow 3, LLC, and WK Smokey Hollow 4, LLC are managed by John M. Kane. The co-PDs wish to redevelop the Brownfields Property for no uses other than office, retail, high -density residential, and associated recreational space and parking, and subject to DEQ's prior written approval, other commercial uses. Demolition of existing structures commenced in March 2019 and the site is currently under construction. Site History: The Brownfields Property was initially developed as single family residences from at least 1914 to 1959. Pigeon Branch Creek flowed north through the northwestern area of this parcel before it was culvertized in the mid-1960s. Around 1965, as part of a downtown Raleigh redevelopment initiative, the residences were razed. Incorporated into historic deeds circa 1966 for these parcels were a number of restrictive covenants that prohibited specific uses including manufacturing, disposal, or residential uses; however, language in the deeds conveying these parcels from the Raleigh Redevelopment Commission provided for the automatic termination of these restrictive covenants at midnight, November 6, 1990. Hence, these restrictive covenants no longer apply. Since that time the primary use has been office space and associated parking. From the mid- 1960s through 2018, the primary uses of the Brownfields Property on the various parcels had been office space, a fur storage facility, antique shop, and associated surface parking. The original six parcels comprising the Brownfields Property and their relationship to the two new parcels are summarized in the table below: 2 Former New Parcel New Parcel New Former Former Parcel ID Former Reference & ID No. Acreage2 Parcel Address Acreage No. Address Lot 2- 413 N. 1' Harrington 1704512292 2.17 421 N. 1704513421 0.95 Harrington St. St. 506 N. 2 1704511285 0.66 West St. 516 N. 3 1704512404 0.51 West St. Lot 1- 520 N. 4 1704511469 0.04 500 N. West 1704512232 2.52 West St. 5 1704511562 0.05 West St. 524 N. 6 1704512525 0.14 West St. 'Encompasses the past recombination of three parcels with the former addresses of 413, 437, & 441 N. Harrington Street that is subject to a prior Brownfields Agreement (BF Project No. 20031-16-092), which was recorded on January 6, 2017 (Wake County Registry of Deeds, Book 016661, Page 01312). 2The new acreage is less approximately 0.1 acres that was transferred to adjacent public right-of-ways. Summary of Environmental Conditions: The Brownfields Property is situated in an area of Raleigh that moved from predominantly residential to commercial uses in the 1960s. The Brownfields Property is not listed on any regulatory environmental databases, except that a portion of the Brownfields Property as noted above is a NC Brownfields Property. Several nearby and neighboring properties are listed on regulatory databases. Chemical use at the Brownfields Property was minimal given its use as residential or office property; a printer service was located on one of the parcels for a time, but no environmental concerns have been detected at the Property stemming from that use. Bulk oil storage facilities and underground storage tank incidents are known within the area, including hydraulically upgradient of the BF property. Environmental investigations at the Brownfields Property consisted of soil, groundwater, and/or vapor intrusion assessments conducted in 2004, 2013, 2015, 2016, and 2019. The results of these investigations are discussed below. An EMP required by the original BFA for the Harrington Street Brownfields Property addressed handling impacted soil or unexpected conditions upon their discovery during construction for the entirety of the Smokey Hollow 2 Brownfields Property. Potential Receptors: Potential receptors are construction workers, workers, residents, visitors, and trespassers. Contaminated Media Summary: DEQ has evaluated data collected from the following media at the subject property: groundwater, soil, and soil vapor. DEQ relies on the following data to base its conclusions regarding the subject property and its suitability for its intended reuse. Soil Although low concentrations of benzene, toluene, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and metals were detected in site soil, these concentrations did not exceed DWM Residential Preliminary Soil Remedial Goals, except for arsenic concentrations which ranged from 1.2 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) to 4.2 mg/kg, in excess of the residential PSRG of 0.68 mg/kg. Groundwater Available groundwater results indicated one well location from 2015 with benzene (4.9 µg/L) and C5-C8 aliphatic petroleum hydrocarbons (2,400 µg/L) at temporary well TMW-2 in excess of 2L standards of 1 µg/L and 400 µg/L, respectively. Groundwater sampling conducted in 2019 indicated exceedances of cadmium, iron, and manganese from groundwater samples TMW-1W, TMW-2W, & TMW-3W, although this could have been related to improper development of the temporary wells prior to sampling. Surface Water There is no surface water at the Brownfields Property, although Pigeon House Branch flows below a portion of the northwestern area of the site in a culvert. Soil Vapor Soil gas sampling was not originally conducted at the Harrington Street Brownfields Property due to the limited VOCs in groundwater, and that for those contaminants detected, the concentrations in groundwater did not exceed the applicable DWM Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels (VISLs) to indicate soil vapor sampling. Sub -Slab Vapor Because new construction slated for the larger Brownfields Property contained several elevator shafts, sub -slab vapor data were collected at a depth of about one (1) foot below existing concrete slabs or below asphalt or concrete parking surfaces to evaluate the potential for vapor intrusion in the elevator areas of the new construction and near offsite sources of contamination. Several volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected across the Brownfields Property; however, no VOCs exceeded established DWM VISLs; only three VOCs, 1,3,-dichlorobenzene, ethanol, and trichlorofluoromethane, were detected and reported in Exhibit 2, but they did not have established VISLs. Indoor Air Indoor air data were not collected due to the low concentrations of VOCs in site groundwater and sub -slab data. 2 Risk Calculations The available site data was entered into the DWM Risk Calculator (May 2019 version). The results of the risk calculations are provided below: Risk for Individual Pathways Version Date: May 2019 Basis: May 2019 EPA RSL Table Site ID: 22062-18-092 Exposure Unit ID: Site Wide DIRECT CONTACT SOIL AND WATER CALCULATORS Receptor Pathway Carc�skenic Hazard Index Risk exceeded? Resident Soil 8.6E-06 3.9E-01 NO Groundwater Use* 2.8E-05 3.2E+01 YES Non -Residential Worker Soil 1.5E-06 5.6E-02 NO Groundwater Use* 6.5E-06 7.3E+00 YES Construction Worker Soil 3.0E-07 4.9E-01 NO Recreator/Trespasser Soil 4.8E-06 1.3E-01 NO Surface Water* NC NC NC VAPOR INTRUSION CALCULATORS Receptor Pathway Carcinogenic Risk Hazard Index Risk exceeded? Resident Groundwater to Indoor Air 6.9E-06 4.8E+02 YES Soil Gas to Indoor Air 3.9E-07 2.2E-02 NO Indoor Air 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 NO Non -Residential Worker Groundwater to Indoor Air 1.6E-06 1.2E+02 YES Soil Gas to Indoor Air 3.0E-08 1.8E-03 NO Indoor Air 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 NO From the risk calculator's output, groundwater use for residential or non-residential worker scenarios indicate an exceedance of the non cancer hazard index threshold of 1.0. Soil exposures for residential, non-residential and construction worker also do not exceed either an acceptable carcinogenic risk range nor the threshold non cancer risk hazard index threshold of 1.0. Although groundwater to indoor air risk calculations exceed the non cancer hazard index of 1.0 for both residential and non-residential exposure scenarios, the soil gas to indoor air calculations indicate that an acceptable environmental carcinogenic risk and the non cancer hazard index are not exceeded for either exposure scenario. Required Land Use Restrictions — Land use restrictions will include the standard Environmental Management Plan, groundwater, soil disturbance, and known contaminants LURs. Due to the low concentrations of VOCs in onsite groundwater, and resulting risk calculator results, the vapor mitigation system LUR is not included. Based on the site -specific data provided to the Brownfield program, the site reuse is suitable for the site as long as the agreed upon land use restrictions in the BFA are abided by. 5