The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About22069 Okey Hosiery Final EMP 20190711Environmental Management Plan Okey Hosiery Brownfields 110 and 118 E. Kingston Avenue Charlotte, North Carolina Brownfields Project No. 22069-18-060 H&H Job No. WPP-007 July 10, 2019 #C-1269 Engineering #245 Geology CONTENTS Completed EMP Template Form Tables Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Data Table 2 Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Data Table 3 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data Figures Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site and Sample Location Map Appendices Appendix A Site Redevelopment Plan 1 EMP Version 2, June 2018 NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager. The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory-compliant decision-making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP, including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have questions. Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any earthmoving or other development-related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project, and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be cause for a reopener So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature. ☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager. ☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project, submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager. 2 EMP Version 2, June 2018 Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant and applicable to the proposed redevelopment: ☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted. ☐ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for each media. ☐ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis. ☐ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain on site after construction grading. ☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.). ☐ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction. ☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas, etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment. ☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media applicable to the proposed redevelopment. ☐ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final. ☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for brownfields approval. ☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources, detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property. ☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines. ☐ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export and sampling data from those areas. ☐ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover. 3 EMP Version 2, June 2018 GENERAL INFORMATION Date: 7/10/2019 Revision Date (if applicable): Click or tap to enter a date. Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Okey Hosiery Brownfields Project Number: 22069-18-060 Brownfields Property Address: 110 & 118 E. Kingston Avenue, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (Figure 1) Brownfields Property Area (acres): 1.2 acres Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes ☒ No If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text. Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text. COMMUNICATIONS A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN. Prospective Developer (PD): WP Kingston, LLC Contact Person: Jay W. Levell Phone Numbers: Office: 704-412-7112 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text. Email: jay@whitepointpartners.com Contractor for PD: Liles Construction Contact Person: Paul Liles Phone Numbers: Office: 704-707-2496 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text. Email: pliles@lilesconstruction.com Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC Contact Person: Bo Cappleman Phone Numbers: Office: 704-586-0007 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text. Email: bcappleman@harthickman.com Brownfields Program Project Manager: Bill Schmithorst Phone Numbers: Office: 919-707-8159 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text. Email: william.schmithorst@ncdenr.gov 4 EMP Version 2, June 2018 Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch, Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste): Not Applicable NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task: On-site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior ☒ Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior ☒ Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours ☒ Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours ☒ Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior ☒ Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days ☒ REDEVELOPMENT PLANS 1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply): ☐Residential ☐Recreational ☐Institutional ☒Commercial ☒Office ☒Retail ☐Industrial ☐Other specify: Click or tap here to enter text. 2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth-moving activities at the site: ☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps) ☒ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility lines, etc. ☐ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors 3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature): Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures: 5 EMP Version 2, June 2018 PD’s initial redevelopment plans include adaptive re-use of the existing buildings for a mixture of retail, office, and restaurants with an outdoor patio space on the western portion of the Site. A Preliminary Site Layout of the proposed redevelopment is included as Appendix A. The proposed redevelopment includes re-paving the existing parking lot and adding landscaped areas. PD’s future redevelopment plans have not yet been determined, but may include commercial/retail (including restaurants, bars, breweries, and distilleries), office, hotel/hospitality, open space, multi-family residential, recreational, institutional, light industrial, warehousing, and parking. 4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown ☐ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please provide a copy of your demolition permit. 5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown ☐ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved. 6) Which category of risk-based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes. ☒ Residential ☐ Non-Residential or Industrial/Commercial 7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule): a) Construction start date: 8/1/2019 b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase): Redevelopment activities are expected to begin in August 2019 and be completed in June 2021. Activities include re-paving of the parking lot areas and installation of landscaped areas. Redevelopment of the existing structures will also occur and will not disturb the subsurface. c) Additional phases planned? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known: Start Date: N/A Planned Activity: Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date. Planned Activity: 6 EMP Version 2, June 2018 Click or tap here to enter text. Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date. Planned Activity: Click or tap here to enter text. d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: TBD CONTAMINATED MEDIA 1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property Part 1. Soil:……………………………………….……………. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected Part 2. Groundwater:.……………………….……..……. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected Part 3. Surface Water:.……………...……..…………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected Part 4. Sediment:.……………...……..…………………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected Part 5. Soil Vapor:…..…………...……..…………………. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected Part 6. Sub-Slab Soil Vapor:……...……..…………….. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected Part 7. Indoor Air:...……..…………………………………. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected 2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations. PART 1. Soil – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations. 1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants): A tabular summary of soil analytical data in comparison to the February 2018 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) is included as Table 1. Soil sample locations are shown in Figure 2. A brief summary of the results is provided below. VOCs have not been detected in soil samples at concentrations above residential or industrial/commercial PSRGs. Several polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were detected at concentrations above the residential and/or industrial/commercial PSRGs in soil sample SB-4 (1.5-2.5 ft), which was collected from the approximate location of former on-Site gasoline underground storage tanks (USTs). 7 EMP Version 2, June 2018 Hexavalent chromium was detected above residential PSRGs in samples SB-1 (0.5-1.0 ft) and SB-2 (0.5-1.5 ft), which were collected in a former dye room in the southern portion of the site. Hexavalent chromium was also detected in sample SB-3 (0.5-1.5 ft), which was collected within the footprint of a former coal storage shed in the central portion of the site. Arsenic was also detected in sample SB-3 (0.5-1.5 ft) above the industrial/commercial PSRG and the published average background level for North Carolina soils. However, the arsenic detection in SB-3 (0.5- 1.5 ft) is within the range of published background levels for North Carolina soils. The detected hexavalent chromium and arsenic concentrations appear to be naturally occurring. Additional metals, including barium, cobalt, copper, mercury, nickel, and selenium, were detected at concentrations generally consistent with published average background levels for North Carolina soils. 2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet): 0.5-2.5 feet. 3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet): The area of potential soil disturbance is estimated to be approximately 0.5 acres (21,780 sq ft) of the 1.2-acre site. The area of potential disturbance will consist of the existing parking areas (future parking lot and patio) and landscaped areas. The remainder of the site will remain covered by the existing buildings and the light rail and adjacent walkways. 4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet): Shallow soil disturbance (i.e., less than 1 ft) on the Brownfields property is currently planned as part of re-paving of the parking lot. Excavation for the installation of new utilities may include trenching to depths of up to 5 ft bgs. 5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan): Based on conservative estimates of potential disturbance of up to 2 ft across an approximately 0.5-acre area, approximately 1,600 cubic yards of soil may be disturbed. 6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants: Excavation of impacted soil is not anticipated. 7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable: Export of impacted soil is not anticipated. Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are acceptable, if only preliminary data available). 8 EMP Version 2, June 2018 1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION: a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ☐Yes ☒No ☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed). Click or tap here to enter text. ☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained-Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the North Carolina Contained-In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes ☒ No b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS THE CONTAINED-OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA CONTAINED-IN POLICY THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS. c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results). ☐ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text. ☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text. ☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text. ☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text. ☐ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text. ☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory TCLP standard) Click or tap here to enter text. ☒ If no, explain rationale: Soil analytical data does not indicate detections capable of exceeding Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) criteria using the Rule of 20. d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS. 2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite): ☒ Preliminary Health-Based Residential SRGs ☒ Preliminary Health-Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs 9 EMP Version 2, June 2018 ☒ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only) ☐ Site-specific risk-based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for determination/explanation. Click or tap here to enter text. Additional comments: Click or tap here to enter text. 3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary, please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map. ☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager ☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map to Brownfields Project Manager once known ☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material. Provide description of material: Click or tap here to enter text. ☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☒ ☒ Describe cap or fill: Should impacted soil be encountered during redevelopment, the potentially impacted soil will be placed beneath impervious surfaces (asphalt pavement, sidewalks, buildings, etc.) or a minimum of 2 ft of clean fill. ☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-recorded if actions are Post-Recordation). ☒ GPS the location and provide site map with final location. ☐ Other. Please provide a description of the measure: 4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and management of site soils: Management of fugitive dust from site ☒ Yes, describe the method will include: Significant areas of contaminated soil are not expected to be encountered or disturbed during site redevelopment activities based upon soil sampling data. The grading contractor will consider conditions such as wind speed, wind direction, and moisture content of soil during soil grading and stockpiling activities to minimize dust generation. In the unlikely event that contaminated soil is encountered during site redevelopment that requires excavation, particular attention will be paid by contractors to implement dust control measures as needed based on site and atmospheric conditions (i.e. by controlled water application, hydro-seeding, and/or mulch, stone, or plastic cover). Potentially impacted soil Click or tap here to enter text. 10 EMP Version 2, June 2018 will be managed as described below. ☐ No, explain rationale: Click or tap here to enter text. Field Screening of site soil ☒ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting field screening: During soil disturbance at the site, the workers or contractors will observe soils for evidence of potential impacts. Evidence of potentially impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e. chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be noted during site work, the contractor will contact the project environmental engineer to observe the suspect condition. If the project environmental engineer confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures below will be implemented. In addition, the DEQ Brownfields project manager will be contacted within two business days to advise of the condition. ☐ No, explain rationale: Click or tap here to enter text. Soil Sample Collection ☐ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in-situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.): Click or tap here to enter text. ☒ No, explain rationale: Collection of additional soil samples is not anticipated based on the results of previous site assessment activities. If significant soil impact is encountered during grading and/or installation or removal of utilities, excavation will proceed only as far as needed to allow grading and/or construction of the utility to continue and/or only as far as needed to allow alternate corrective measures as described below. Suspect significantly impacted soil excavated during grading and/or utility line installation or removal may be stockpiled and covered in a secure area to allow construction to progress. Suspect impacted soil will be underlain by and covered with minimum 10-mil plastic sheeting. At least one representative sample of the soil will be collected for analysis of total VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals. If the results of analysis of the sample indicate that the soil could potentially exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria, then the soil will also be analyzed by TCLP for those compounds that could exceed the toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria. Impacted soil will be handled in the manner described below based upon the laboratory analyses: i. If no organic compounds are detected in a sample (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts) and metals are below unrestricted use PSRGs or are consistent with site-specific background levels, then the soil will be deemed suitable for use as on-site fill or as off-site fill. The proposed location(s) for off-site 11 EMP Version 2, June 2018 placement of soil (other than a permitted facility) along with the receiving facility’s written approval for acceptance of the soil will be provided to DEQ for approval prior to taking the soil off-site. ii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed unrestricted use PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with site-specific background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil may be used on-site as fill without conditions. iii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the unrestricted use PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil, with DEQ’s written approval, may be used on-site as fill below an impervious surface, at least 2 ft of compacted clean soil, or a geotechnical fabric. If the impacted soil with concentrations above unrestricted use PSRGs is moved to an on-site location, its location and depth will be documented and provided to DEQ and the impacted soil will be placed beneath at least 2 ft of compacted clean soil, an impervious surface, or covered with a geotechnical fabric. iv. Impacted soil may be transported to a permitted facility such as a landfill provided that the soil is accepted at the disposal facility. If soil is transported to a permitted facility, the permitted facility’s written approval to dispose of soil from the site will be included with the final EMP report. In the unlikely event that the sample data indicates concentrations above TCLP hazardous waste criteria, then the soil must be transported off-site to a permitted disposal facility that can accept or treat hazardous waste. *Please note that should the PD elect to transport export soil to a permitted facility or to a DEQ Brownfields pre-approved receiving facility, soil will be direct loaded onto trucks for transport off-site. If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes: ☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 ☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 ☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): EPA Method 6020/7471 ☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text. ☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text. ☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text. 12 EMP Version 2, June 2018 ☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as needed: ☒ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes below (Check all that apply): ☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 ☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 ☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): EPA Methods 6020/7471 ☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text. ☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text. ☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Click or tap here to enter text. Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology. Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, a work plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover. Following completion of soil disturbance for any future Site development (i.e. after grading and utility construction), an environmental professional will be contracted to assess the site for areas that are not covered with clean fill soil, building foundations, sidewalks, asphalt or concrete parking areas, driveways, or other impervious surfaces. If such areas exist, a Work Plan will be prepared for final grade sampling for DEQ review and approval. If no such areas exist, documentation will be provided to the DEQ Brownfields project manager. ☐ If final grade sampling was NOT selected please explain rationale: Click or tap here to enter text. Click or tap here to enter text. 13 EMP Version 2, June 2018 Part 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property owner.” Requirements for importing fill: 1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown 2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported? Structural fill is not anticipated to be imported to the site. However, limited amounts of organic rich topsoil may be imported from a commercial landscape material vendor for use in proposed landscaped areas. 3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range of depths, please list the range.) 0 to 2 feet 4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns, etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history: As noted above, importing fill soil is not anticipated at this time. Should import soil be needed during redevelopment of the Brownfields property, DEQ will be notified and the procedures outlined below will be implemented. 5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be approved for use at the Brownfields property. The PD plans to import limited amounts of organic rich topsoil from a commercial landscape material vendor for use in proposed landscaped areas. The PD does not plan to collect samples of landscaping materials prior to placement at the Site. DEQ Brownfields will be notified of the volume of landscaping material needed and the proposed source of the material prior to placement in proposed landscaping areas. Import fill for grading and or construction purposes is not anticipated at this time. However, see No. 7 below for details outlining the proposed plan to demonstrate import soil meets acceptable standards applicable to the Site should import soil be needed during redevelopment. 6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply): ☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 ☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 14 EMP Version 2, June 2018 ☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 6020/7471 ☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text. ☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text. ☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Click or tap here to enter text. 7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in-situ borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought onto the Brownfields Property. The PD will follow the procedures outlined below to demonstrate import soil meets acceptable standards applicable to the Site: - - If the PD plans to import fill material from Vulcan Materials Company quarry located near Pineville, NC or from the Martin Marietta quarry located on Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, NC, no samples of the import material will be collected as adequate analytical data is available in the DEQ Brownfields database to demonstrate material from these facilities is suitable for use as structural fill at a Brownfields property. - If fill soil is obtained from an off-Site property that is not a known permitted quarry, a sampling plan will be developed and submitted for DEQ review. DEQ approval of the sampling plan and analytical results will be obtained prior to transporting import soil to the Site. The specific sampling rate will be outlined in the aforementioned sampling plan. However, if the proposed borrow source has not been previously developed (i.e., virgin land), soil samples will be collected for laboratory analyses indicated above at a general rate of one per 1,000 cubic yards. If the borrow source property has been previously developed, soil samples will be collected for laboratory analyses indicated above at a general rate of approximately one per 500 cubic yards. Fill soil will be considered suitable for use at the Site if it does not contain compound concentrations above DEQ IHSB unrestricted use PSRGs and metals concentrations are generally consistent with previously identified background concentrations at other Brownfields sites in the South End district of Charlotte. Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM, ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN 15 EMP Version 2, June 2018 WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for additional details. 1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of export and sampling results included. Export soil is not anticipated at this time. If exporting soil is ultimately necessary, a sampling plan will be developed and submitted to DEQ Brownfields for review and approval once the volume of soil for export is known. Generally, soil samples will be collected from export soil at a rate of 1 sample per every 400-500 cubic yards of export. DEQ approval of the sampling plan and analytical results will be obtained prior to transporting export soil from the site. Based on analytical results of soil samples collected from the export soil, the soil will be transported off-site to a suitable location. The PD will notify DEQ Brownfields of the location receiving the export soil. If not a permitted facility, DEQ Brownfields approval and written approval from the receiving facility will be obtained prior to transporting the soil off- site. 2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent? ☒ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by landfill) ☒ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be determined by the accepting Landfill; ☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility ☒ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property – determination that a site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields property, and that a record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below. ☒ Use as Beneficial Fill off-site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below. 3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide details related to the proposed plans). The environmental engineer will contact DEQ Brownfields to obtain DEQ Brownfields and DEQ Solid Waste approval prior to exporting soil to a non-Brownfields property. 16 EMP Version 2, June 2018 Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES ☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill (Preferred) ☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth from which it was excavated. ☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants? ☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials: Click or tap here to enter text. ☒ If no, include rationale here: No VOCs have been detected in vapor samples collected at the site at concentrations above the DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels (VISLs). Sub-slab vapor data is summarized in Table 2. Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches: Although not anticipated, in the event contaminated soil and/or vapors are encountered in utility trenches during redevelopment activities, the trench will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be performed to protect workers. If results indicate further action is warranted in response to vapors to protect workers, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented. The contractor and workers will observe soil for potential impacts during utility installation activities. Evidence of potential significant impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e. chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be noted during utility work, the contractor will contact the project environmental engineer to observe the suspect condition and screen the soil using a photo-ionization detector (PID) or other similar vapor field screening instrument. If the project environmental engineer confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures outlined Managing On-Site Soil above (Part 1.A.) will be implemented. In addition, the environmental engineer will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within two business days to advise that person of the condition PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below. 1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property? Depth to groundwater was measured at approximately 12-13 ft bgs in temporary monitoring wells installed at the site. 17 EMP Version 2, June 2018 2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☐onsite ☐offsite ☐both or ☒unknown sources? Describe source(s): A tabular summary of historical groundwater analytical data in comparison to the North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 2L Groundwater Standards (2L Standards) is included as Table 3, and groundwater sample locations are shown on Figure 2. A summary is provided below. The VOCs toluene and chloroform were detected in groundwater at concentrations below their respective 2L Standards and DEQ VISLs. No other VOCs have been detected above laboratory detection limits in historical samples collected at the site. The SVOCs benzoic acid and phenol were detected in groundwater at concentrations below their respective 2L Standards. No other SVOCs have been detected above laboratory detection limits in historical samples collected at the site. Several metals, including barium, cadmium, chromium, copper, cobalt, lead, nickel, and/or selenium, were detected in groundwater samples collected at the site. Cobalt was detected in sample TMW-1 at a concentration above the Interim Maximum Allowable Concentration (IMAC) of 1.0 µg/L. TMW-1 was collected downgradient of the former dye room in the southern portion of the Site. Selenium was detected in sample TMW-3 at a concentration above the 2L Standard. TMW-3 was collected within the footprint of the former carbonic laboratory in the northern portion of the site. 3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property? Groundwater flow at the site is expected to mimic topography and flow toward the northwest. 4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities? ☐Yes ☒No If yes, describe these activities: Groundwater is not anticipated to be encountered during the proposed redevelopment of the Site. See below for groundwater management procedures in the unlikely event that groundwater is encountered. Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or sampling procedures). Although not anticipated at this time, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken if groundwater gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted (based on previous sampling data, strong odor, unnatural color, sheen, etc.) during construction activities. The contractor will contact the environmental professional to observe the area(s) suspected to be impacted. The accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent time for dissipation does not disrupt the construction schedule. Should the time needed for natural dissipation of accumulated water be deemed inadequate, the water will be tested and disposed off-site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ surface water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and 18 EMP Version 2, June 2018 State regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control 5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☐Yes ☒No If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes ☐No 6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously unidentified wells. ☐ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It is the Brownfields Program’s intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring through another section of DEQ or the EPA. ☐ Location of existing monitoring wells marked ☐ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance ☒ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for abandonment is given. 7) Please provide additional details as needed: Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD be responsible for replacement of the well. PART 3. SURFACE WATER -Please fill out the information below. 1) Is surface water present at the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No 2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property. 3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes ☒ No 4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No 5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts): If surface water run-off gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted during construction activities, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken. The accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent time for dissipation does not disrupt the construction schedule. Should the time needed for natural dissipation of accumulated water be deemed inadequate, the water will be tested and disposed off-site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ surface Click or tap here to enter text. 19 EMP Version 2, June 2018 water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and State regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control. PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below. 1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No 2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☐ No 3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No 4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property. 5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance): Not applicable PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below. 1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media: IHSB Residential Screening Levels: Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown Groundwater:.….☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels: Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown Groundwater:…..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown 2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site screening levels. 3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated? 4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown 5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management of such contact: In the unlikely event contaminated soil vapors are encountered during future redevelopment N/A 20 EMP Version 2, June 2018 activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be performed. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented. PART 6. SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or foundations will be retained in the redevelopment. 1) Are sub-slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 2) If data indicate that sub-slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing the location of these exceedances. 3) At what depth(s) is sub-slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☐0-6 inches ☐Other, please describe: N/A 4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub-slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown 5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list activities for management of such contact Proposed redevelopment does not include disturbance of the foundations of the Site structures, and sub-slab soil vapor sampling did not indicate exceedances of residential SGSLs. In the unlikely event impacted soil vapors are encountered during future redevelopment activities, worker breathing zone will be monitored using a calibrated photoionization detector. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented. PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below. 1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown 2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels. 3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk-based screening levels will not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown 4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list activities for management of such contact: In the unlikely event there is evidence of potential indoor air issues (i.e. unusual odors) during future redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the indoor air will be performed. If warranted, safety screening procedures will include periodically screening indoor air for volatile organic vapors with a calibrated photoionization detector. If results indicate 21 EMP Version 2, June 2018 VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM – Please fill out the information below. Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☐ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately If submitted separately provide date: Click or tap here to enter text. VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted: Based on the results of vapor intrusion assessment activities, there does not appear to be a vapor intrusion risk for residential occupants or non-residential workers in the on-site structures. Therefore, a vapor mitigation plan is not warranted for the proposed redevelopment of the site. CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered. Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this EMP. Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be prepared based on the EMP requirements and site-specific factors. Samples will generally be collected to document the location of the potential impacts. Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases: ☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 ☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 ☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver) EPA Method 6020 and EPA Method 7471 further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented. 22 EMP Version 2, June 2018 ☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text. ☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text. ☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.) Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should be conducted, even if not listed here. Click or tap here to enter text. Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties. During construction activities, contractors may encounter unknown sub-surface environmental conditions (i.e. tanks, drums, or waste materials) that if encountered, will require proper management. Prior to beginning site work, H&H will attend a pre-construction kick-off meeting with the PD and the redevelopment contractors to discuss the DEQ approved EMP and various scenarios when it would be appropriate and necessary to notify H&H of the discovery of unknown subsurface features or potentially impacted media at the site. In the event that such conditions are encountered during site development activities, the environmental actions noted below will be used to direct environmental actions to be taken during these activities and sampling data for potentially impacted soil and the disposition of impacted soil will be provided to DEQ when the data becomes available. Underground Storage Tanks: In the event a UST or impacts associated with a UST release are discovered at the site during redevelopment activities, the UST and/or UST related impacts will be addressed through the Brownfields Program. If a UST is encountered that cannot be removed or does not require removal for geotechnical or construction purposes, it will be abandoned in-place and construction will proceed. Where appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before abandonment to prevent fluid accumulation. If the UST contains residual fluids, the fluids will be removed, sampled for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals, and transported off-site for disposal at a suitable facility based on the laboratory analytical results. Impacted soil will be managed in accordance with the Managing On-Site Soil section outlined above in the EMP. Sub-Grade Feature/Pit: If a sub-grade feature or pit is encountered and does not require removal for geotechnical or construction purposes, it will be filled with soil or suitable fill and construction will proceed. Where appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before back filling to prevent fluid accumulation. If the pit has waste in it, the waste may be set aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste 23 EMP Version 2, June 2018 disposal purposes for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, and TCLP metals and disposed off-site at a permitted facility or the waste will be managed in accordance with the Managing On-Site Soil section outlined above in the EMP, whichever is most applicable based on the type of waste present. If the pit must be removed and the observed waste characteristics indicate the concrete may potentially be contaminated to a significant degree, the concrete will be sampled and analyzed by methods specified by the disposal facility. Buried Waste Material: If excavation into buried wastes or significantly impacted soils occurs, the contractor is instructed to stop work in that location and notify the environmental consultant. The environmental consultant will review the materials and collect samples if warranted. In this event, confirmation sampling will be conducted at representative locations in the base and the sidewalls of the excavation after the waste or significantly impacted soil is removed. The confirmation samples will be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals. Areas of suspected contaminated soil that remain at the site after excavation is complete above the DEQ unrestricted use PSRGs will be managed pursuant to this plan. Re-Use of Impacted Soils On-Site: Please refer to description outlined in the Managing On-Site Soil section (Part 1.A.) of the EMP above. If unknown, impacted soil is identified on-site, management on-site can be considered after the project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields Project Manager approval prior to final placement on-site. If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as needed below: Click or tap here to enter text. POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING ☒ Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary Report is anticipated to be submitted on 1/31/2021 The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment-related activities since the last 24 EMP Version 2, June 2018 report, with a summary and drawings, that describes: 1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property; 2. soil grading and cut and fill actions; 3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of environmental media; 4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed to be contaminated with regulated substances; and 5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example, concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required manifests shall be included). ☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement. 26 EMP Version 2, June 2018 Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Results Okey Hosiery Brownfields 110 and 118 E. Kingston Avenue Charlotte, North Carolina H&H Job No. WPP-007 Sample ID SB-1 SOIL-DUP-1 SB-2 SB-3 SB-4 SB-5 Date 11/6/2018 11/5/2018 11/6/2018 11/5/2018 Area of Potential Concern Acetone Vat and Former Dye Room Former Coal Storage Shed Depth (ft bgs)0.5-1.5 0.5-1.5 1.5-2.5 12-14 Range MeanUnits VOCs (8260B)2-Butanone (MEK)<0.0025 <0.0025 0.0034 J <0.0025 <0.0030 <0.0025 5,500 40,000 17 ----Methylene chloride <0.0026 <0.0026 <0.0030 <0.0025 <0.0031 0.0058 J 58 650 0.025 --Naphthalene <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0012 <0.0010 0.0036 J <0.0011 4.1 18 0.39 ----Toluene <0.0016 <0.0015 <0.0018 <0.0015 0.0024 J <0.0016 990 9,700 8.3 ----1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.0017 <0.0017 <0.0020 <0.0017 0.0039 J <0.0018 63 370 12 ---- SVOCs (8270D) Acenaphthene <0.0928 <0.0961 <0.0967 <0.0905 0.136 J <0.0941 720 9,000 16 ---- Acenaphthylene <0.0953 <0.0986 <0.0992 <0.0928 2.76 <0.0966 NS NS 41 Anthracene <0.0904 <0.0936 <0.0941 <0.0881 3.13 <0.0917 3,600 45,000 1,300 ---- Benzo(a)anthracene <0.0745 <0.0771 <0.0776 0.110 J 17.5 <0.0755 1.1 21 0.35 ---- Benzo(a)pyrene <0.0770 <0.0797 <0.0801 <0.0750 16.3 <0.0780 0.11 2.1 0.12 ---- Benzo(b)fluoranthene <0.0696 <0.0721 <0.0725 0.182 J 21.2 <0.0706 1.1 21 1.2 ---- Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <0.103 <0.106 <0.107 <0.100 11.3 <0.104 NS NS 15,600 ---- Benzo(k)fluoranthene <0.0794 <0.0822 <0.0827 <0.0774 8.59 <0.0805 11 210 12 ---- Benzoic acid <0.0733 <0.0759 <0.0763 <0.0714 0.124 J <0.0743 51,000 660,000 120 ---- Chrysene <0.0538 <0.0556 <0.0560 0.150 J 14.0 <0.0545 110 2,100 36 ---- Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.0855 <0.0885 <0.0890 <0.0833 3.39 <0.0867 0.11 2.1 0.38 ---- Fluoranthene 0.0649 J <0.0607 <0.0611 0.387 J 24.0 <0.0594 480 6,000 670 ---- Fluorene <0.0831 <0.0860 <0.0865 <0.0809 0.260 J <0.0842 480 6,000 110 ---- Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene <0.0831 <0.0860 <0.0865 <0.0809 10.0 <0.0842 1.1 21 3.9 ---- 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.0867 <0.0898 <0.0903 <0.0845 0.102 J <0.0879 48 600 3.1 ---- Naphthalene <0.0990 <0.102 <0.103 <0.0964 0.250 J <0.100 4.1 18 0.39 ---- Phenanthrene <0.0672 <0.0696 <0.0700 0.252 J 3.77 <0.0681 NS NS 134 ----Pyrene <0.0684 <0.0708 <0.0712 0.313 J 24.0 <0.0694 360 4,500 440 ---- Metals (6020B/7471B/7199) Antimony 0.359 J 0.249 J 0.280 J NA NA NA 6.3 93 0.9 <1.0 - 8.8 (3)0.76 (3) Arsenic 3.47 3.82 3.77 6.68 4.58 0.441 J 0.68 3.0 5.8 1.0 - 18 4.8 Barium 75.5 74.7 76.0 75.8 56.6 70.1 3,100 47,000 580 50 - 1,000 356 Cadmium <0.0919 <0.0974 <0.0978 0.114 J 0.112 J <0.102 14 200 3.0 1.0 - 10 (4)4.3 (4) Chromium (total)28.7 36.8 42.6 48.8 24.2 17.8 0.31 6.5 3.8 7.0 - 300 65 Hexavalent Chromium 0.482 J 0.390 J 0.578 J 0.430 J <0.322 <0.326 0.31 6.5 3.8 NS NS Trivalent Chromium 28.22 36.41 42.02 48.37 24.2 17.8 230,000 3,500,000 360,000 NS NS Cobalt 10.5 11.7 11.5 NA NA NA 4.7 70 0.90 ND - 50 14.2 Copper 30.0 30.4 30.5 NA NA NA 630 9,300 700 3.0 - 100 34 Lead 23.9 18.7 12.5 28.9 30.6 5.06 400 800 270 ND - 50 16 Mercury 0.0789 0.0539 0.0496 0.0281 0.130 0.00568 J 2.3 9.7 1.0 0.03 - 0.52 0.121 Nickel 8.20 7.31 10.4 NA NA NA 310 4,700 130 ND - 150 23 Selenium 1.11 1.11 1.15 1.20 1.29 0.377 J 78 1,200 2.1 <0.1 - 0.8 0.42Silver<0.178 <0.189 <0.190 <0.181 <0.195 <0.198 78 1,200 3.4 ND - 5.0 (4)NS Notes: 1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (February 2018). 2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005. 3) Background values reported for soils of the eastern United States. 4) Background values reported for soils of the southeastern United States. Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits. Bold values exceed Protection of Groundwater PSRGs and the regional background concentrations for metals Bold and underlined values exceed Residential PSRGs and the regional background concentrations for metals Yellow shaded values exceed Industrial/Commercial PSRGs VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; ft bgs= feet below ground surface UST = underground storage tank; NA = not analyzed; NS = not specified; -- = not applicable; ND = not detected J = estimated value between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory reporting limit mg/kg Published Background Metals Concentrations for North Carolina Soils (2) Protection of Groundwater PSRGs (1) Residential PSRGs (1) Industrial/ Commercial PSRGs (1) 0.5-1.5 11/6/2018 Former Dye Room Former Gasoline USTs S:\AAA-Master Projects\White Point Partners (WPP)\WPP-007 E. Kingston Ave\EMP\Data Tables (3-12-19) 3/21/2019 Table 1 Hart & Hickman, PC Table 2 Summary of Sub-Slab Soil Vapor Analytical Results Okey Hosiery Brownfields 110 and 118 E. Kingston Avenue Charlotte, North Carolina H&H Job No. WPP-007 AcetoneBenzene2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon TetrachlorideDichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)Ethanol4-Ethyltoluene2-Hexanone (MBK)IsopropanolMethylene Chloride4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)NaphthaleneTetrachloroethyleneToluene1,1,1-TrichloroethaneTrichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneXylenes (Total)SSV-1 Former Hosiery Manufacturing Facility 11/7/2018 9.9 J 1.3 <0.92 <0.41 4.5 22.0 <0.60 0.98 <0.60 <0.84 <0.39 4.6 4.1 5.4 1.1 3.4 J <0.63 <0.62 1.0 J SSV-2 Former Hosiery Manufacturing Facility and Near Former Dye Room 11/7/2018 260 <0.26 21 J <0.41 2.6 38 4.5 5.2 15 J <0.84 2.9 <0.80 5.2 11 <0.41 2.0 J 4.5 1.8 2.4 J SSV-3 11 J <0.26 <0.92 <0.41 11 9.2 J <0.60 <0.48 <0.60 <0.84 <0.39 <0.80 130 2.0 19 9.0 <0.63 <0.62 <1.54 SS-DUP-1 8.7 J <0.26 <0.92 3.0 12 22 <0.60 <0.48 <0.60 1.1 J <0.39 <0.80 120 2.0 18 9.2 <0.63 <0.62 <1.54 220,000 120 35,000 4.1 700 NS NS 210 1,400 4,200 21,000 21 280 35,000 35,000 NS 420 420 700 2,700,000 1,600 440,000 2,000 8,800 NS NS 2,600 18,000 53,000 260,000 260 3,500 440,000 440,000 NS 5,300 5,300 8,800 Notes: 1) North Carolina Department of Environment Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Residential Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) (February 2018) 2) North Carlolina DEQ DWM Non-Residential SGSLs (February 2018) Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory detection limits. Compound concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3). J = estimated value between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory reporting limit NS = Not Specified µg/m3 DWM Residential SGSL (1) DWM Non-Residential SGSL (2) TO-15Sample IDSample DateAnalytical MethodSample LocationFormer Furniture Manufacturing Facility 11/7/2018 S:\AAA-Master Projects\White Point Partners (WPP)\WPP-007 E. Kingston Ave\EMP\Data Tables (3-12-19) 3/12/2019 Table 2 Hart & Hickman, PC Table 3 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results Okey Hosiery Brownfields 110 and 118 E. Kingston Avenue Charlotte, North Carolina H&H Job No. WPP-007 Sample ID TMW-1 GW-DUP-1 TMW-2 TMW-3 TMW-4 Date 11/7/2018 11/7/2018 11/7/2018 Location Description Former Coal Storage Shed Downgradient of Former Gasoline USTs Adjacent to Historical Hosiery Manufacturing Facility and Downgradient of Former Off-Site Dry Cleaner and Gas Station Units VOCs (8260B) Chloroform <0.14 <0.14 6.2 <0.14 <0.14 70 8.1 36Toluene<0.26 <0.26 <0.26 <0.26 0.30 J 600 3,800 16,000 SVOCs (8270D) Benzoic acid 34.2 J <21.6 32.8 J <17.3 <18.0 30,000 NS NSPhenol<3.4 6.9 J 3.2 J <2.7 <2.8 30 NS NS RCRA Metals (6020A-B, 7470A) Antimony <0.754 <0.754 NA NA NA 1.0 (2)---- Arsenic <0.250 <0.250 <0.250 <0.250 <0.250 10 ---- Barium 244 223 194 81.6 265 700 ---- Cadmium 0.216 J <0.160 <0.160 <0.160 <0.160 2.0 ---- Chromium 1.47 J 1.39 J 1.32 J 4.27 2.06 10 ---- Copper 24.4 23.4 NA NA NA 1,000 ---- Cobalt 79.8 78.6 NA NA NA 1.0 (2)---- Lead 0.302 J 0.287 J <0.240 <0.240 0.459 J 15 ---- Mercury <0.0490 <0.0490 <0.0490 <0.0490 <0.0490 1.0 0.18 0.75 Nickel 25.0 24.5 NA NA NA 100 ---- Selenium <0.380 <0.380 1.15 J 26.5 <0.380 20 ---- Silver <0.310 <0.310 <0.310 <0.310 <0.310 20 ---- Notes: 1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) 15A NCAC 02L.0202 Groundwater Standards (2L Standards) (April 2013) 2) Interim Maximum Allowable Concentrations under 5A NCAC 02L .0202 3) NC DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Level (GWSLs) (February 2018) With the exception of metals, only constituents detected in at least one sample are shown. Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L). Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits. Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses. Bold values exceed the 2L Standard. VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds, RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act UST = underground storage tank; NA = not analyzed; NS = not specified; -- = not applicable J = estimated value between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory reporting limit µg/L Downgradient of Former Dye Room and Former Off-Site Dry Cleaners and Gas Stations 11/7/2018 Non-Residential GWSL(3) NC 2L Groundwater Standards (1) Residential GWSL(3) S:\AAA-Master Projects\White Point Partners (WPP)\WPP-007 E. Kingston Ave\EMP\Data Tables (3-12-19) 3/12/2019 Table 3 Hart & Hickman, PC SITE LOCATION MAP OKEY HOSIERY BROWNFIELDS 110 AND 118 E. KINGSTON AVENUE CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA DATE: JOB NO: REVISION NO: FIGURE NO: 3-12-2019 0 1WPP-007 0 2000 4000 APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET N U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100Charlotte, NC 28203704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f) CHARLOTTE EAST, NORTH CAROLINA 1991 SITE FORMER BOILER ROOM TMW-3 TMW-4SB-5 SSV-3 TMW-3 TMW-1 SB-4 SB-5 SB-2 SB-1 ACETONE-BASED SOLVENT VAT PAINT AREA FORMER DYE ROOM SSV-1 SSV-2 TMW-2 TMW-4 FORMER HOSIERY MANUFACTURING FACILITY STRIPPING ROOM FORMER CARBONIC LABORATORY REVISION NO. 0 JOB NO. WPP-007 DATE: 3-12-2019 FIGURE NO. 2 OKEY HOSIERY BROWNFIELDS 110 AND 118 E. KINGSTON AVENUE CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA SITE AND SAMPLE LOCATION MAP 2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100 Charlotte, North Carolina 28203 704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f) License # C-1269 / #C-245 GeologyCAMDEN ROADSOUT H BLVD E. K I NG S T O N A V E N U E CAMDEN GALLERY APARTMENTS (1750 CAMDEN ROAD) MILLER SERVICES (100 E. PARK AVENUE) OFFICE DEPOT (1620 SOUTH BOULEVARD) HINNANT PROSTHETICS (120 E. KINGSTON AVENUE) ROSEMONT (1714 SOUTH BOULEVARD) WALGREENS (1728 SOUTH BOULEVARD) MULTI-TENANT OFFICE AND RETAIL (1700 CAMDEN ROAD) FORMER BOILER ROOM FORMER COAL STORAGE SHED VACANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING (1708 SOUTH BOULEVARD) VACANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING (1710 CAMDEN ROAD) FORMER DRY CLEANER (113/115 EAST BLVD)FORMER AUTO REPAIR SHOP FORMER GAS STATION (1728 SOUTH BLVD) FORMER DRY CLEANER AND GAS STATION (1700 SOUTH BLVD) LEGEND SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY CHARLOTTE LIGHT RAIL UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS DEPICTED ON 1951 AND 1953 SANBORN MAPS DUMPSTER PAD-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL AND SOIL BORING SOIL BORING SUB-SLAB VAPOR SAMPLE TMW-2/SB-3 S:\AAA-Master Projects\White Point Partners (WPP)\WPP-007 E. Kingston Ave\Figures\Site Plan.dwg, FIG 2, 12/14/2018 5:48:21 PM,SVincentMULTI-TENANT OFFICE AND RETAIL (1616 CAMDEN ROAD) Appendix A Site Redevelopment Plan PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION, TYP. PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION, TYP. PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION, TYP.SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFPROPOSED SILT FENCE, TYP. ± 85 LF PROPOSED 4" SOLID WALL PVC STORM DRAIN LINE LIMITS OF PROPOSED TREE PIT stamp / seal: REVISIONS DATENO.DESCRIPTION Disclaimer 2019: Information contained in this document is the property of Bloc Design, PLLC. and the project client listed on this document. The reproduction, copying, and other use without written consent is prohibited and may be subject to legal action to the fullest extent possible. N.T.S. N Dilworth Artisan Station Site Improvements 118 East Kingston Avenue Charlotte, NC 28203 VICINITY MAP SURVEY DISCLAIMER SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY RB PHARR, OCTOBER 29, 2018. P-1007 C-390 S:\Projects\00641 Dilworth Artisan Station\Plans\Production DWGs\00641_CG-100 - Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan.dwg 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 320 Charlotte, NC 28203 phone: 704-940-2883 www.bloc-nc.com landscape architecture I planning I civil engineering TRUE NORTH CHECKED BY: MPIC:CCBDATE: 04/18/2019 DRAWN BY: PROJECT NUMBER:00641.00 SCALE: TITLE: SHEET NO.: 1.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACEMENT OF ALL BARRICADES, SIGNAGE, FLAGGERS, SHORING, ETC., TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF WORKERS AND THE PUBLIC.N¬ JTN CCBNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSCALE: 0 20'40'10' 1"= 20' GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN CG-101 GRADING NOTES: 1.ANY GRADING BEYOND THE DENUDED LIMITS INDICATED ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS A VIOLATION AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE. 2.GRADING MORE THAN ONE ACRE WITHOUT AN APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN IS A VIOLATION AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE. 3.APPROVAL OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS NOT AN AUTHORIZATION TO GRADE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. WHEN FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT OFF-SITE GRADING, PERMISSION SHALL BE OBTAINED BY CONTRACTOR FROM THE AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS AND THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL BE NOTIFIED. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EACH STREAM, CREEK, OR BACKWASH CHANNEL IN AN UNOBSTRUCTED CONDITION AND SHALL REMOVE FROM THESE AREAS ALL DEBRIS, LOGS, TIMBER, TRASH, JUNK AND OTHER ACCUMULATIONS. 5.SITE DRAINS TO IDENTIFIED WETLAND AREA. WETLAND AREA SHALL BE FLAGGED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. WETLAND AREAS SHALL NOT BE ACCESSED BY CONTRACTOR EQUIPMENT, LABORERS, SUBCONTRACTORS, ETC. IN THE EVENT DAMAGE TO THE WETLAND AREA OCCURS, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REMEDIATE ALL ISSUES AT NO COST TO THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVES. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN 0.50% SLOPE MINIMUM ON THE CURB AND GUTTERS 7.THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION HAVE NOT REVIEWED AND ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE STRUCTURAL STABILITY OF ANY EXISTING RETAINING WALLS ONSITE. 8.ALL PAVED AREAS (SIDEWALKS, PLAZAS, PATIOS, ETC.) SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROM THE BUILDING AT 2.00% MINIMUM. 9.FOR SLOPE CONSTRUCTION 3:1 AND STEEPER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER ON THE STABILITY OF SOILS PLANNED FOR THESE SLOPES AND FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER FOR SLOPE CONSTRUCTION. ALL SLOPES SHOULD BE TRACKED TOP TO BOTTOM AND STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL MATTING AND STAKED TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 10.SPOT GRADE ELEVATIONS ARE TAKEN AT FINISHED GRADE (ASPHALT, CONCRETE, TURF) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 11.TOC = TOP OF CURB ELEVATION BOC = BOTTOM OF CURB ELEVATION (GUTTER FLOW LINE) HP = HIGH POINT LP = LOW POINT 12.BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATIONS (BW) REFERENCE BOTTOM OF WALL AT FINISHED GRADE, TYPICAL IN ALL AREAS. TOP OF WALL ELEVATIONS ARE DENOTED BY 'TW' ON THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN. 'TW' REFERS TO TOP OF WALL. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR TOP AND BOTTOM OF FOOTING ELEVATIONS. PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA -/- -/- SYMBOL LEGEND DETAIL