20026_Kaiser Fluid_EMP_2019.05.03

CONTENTS
Completed EMP Form

Tables
Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Table 2 Summary of Well Construction and Groundwater Elevation Data
Table 3 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Table 4 Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Results
Table 5 Summary of Sub-Slab Vapor Analytical Results

Figures
Figure EMP-1 Site Location Map
Figure EMP-2 Sample Location Map (Former Kaiser Fluids Technologies)
Figure EMP-3 Sample Location Map (Former Henkel Chemical Corporation)

Appendices
Appendix A Site Plans
Appendix B Grading Plan

1
EMP Version 2, June 2018
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.
The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory-compliant
decision-making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development-related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project,
and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be
cause for a reopener
So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.
☒Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.
☒Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.

2
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:

☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.

☒ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.

☒ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.

☒ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
on site after construction grading.

☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).

☐ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.

☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.

☐ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.

☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.

☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.

☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.

☐ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.

☐ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.

3
EMP Version 2, June 2018
GENERAL INFORMATION
Date: 1/14/2019 Revision Date (if applicable): 5/3/2019
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Kaiser Fluids Tech II
Brownfields Project Number: 20026-16-060
Brownfields Property Address: 530 East Sugar Creek Road and 4100 East Raleigh Street (formerly
addressed at 600 East Sugar Creek Road), Charlotte, Mecklenburg County
Brownfields Property Area (acres): Approximately 8.221 acres consisting of Mecklenburg County
Parcel Nos. 09107104 and 09107204. The Site location is presented on Figure EMP-1.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
COMMUNICATIONS
A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.
Prospective Developer (PD): Sugar Creek One, LLC and Sugar Creek Station, LLC c/o Flywheel
Group, LLC (Flywheel)
Contact Person: Anthony (Tony) M. Kuhn
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Contractor for PD: Vannoy Construction – Charlotte
Contact Person: Robert Skaff, PE
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC
Contact Person: Matt Ingalls
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Carolyn Minnich
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: [phone]

4
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Email: [e-mail]

Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
N/A

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:

On-site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior ☒

Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior ☒

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours ☒

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours ☒

Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior ☒

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days ☒

REDEVELOPMENT PLANS

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☒Residential ☒Recreational ☐Institutional ☒Commercial ☒Office ☒Retail ☐Industrial
☒Other specify:
The Site will be improved with a mixed-use transit-oriented development. Site redevelopment
plans for the former Kaiser Fluids (530 E. Sugar Creek Road; see Figure EMP-2) portion of the Site
have not yet been determined but may include various retail, commercial, office, and/or residential
use. The former Henkel Chemical building (4100 Raleigh Street; see Figure EMP-3), known as The
Station House, is planned to be redeveloped for various commercial purposes including retail,
restaurants, art galleries, music venues, breweries, and/or co-working spaces.

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth-moving activities
at the site:
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)

5
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☒ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
☐ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors

3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
Current redevelopment plans include the demolition of an approximately 10,200 ft2 portion of the
Henkel building (known as Warehouse #2) and replacement with a four-story structure,
construction of a five-story building addition on the northwest portion of the building, and parking
lot expansion and improvements (see Figure EMP-3). Additionally, other portions of the Henkel
building will undergo some minor renovations and tenant upfits as redevelopment proceeds.

The demolition of Warehouse #2 will include the removal of concrete loading docks, building, slab,
and footers. The building addition will require the removal of concrete pavement. Existing
pavement in the western portion of the Site will be removed and replaced including the concrete
slab of the former storage building located in the southwestern portion of the Site. Additionally,
the subgrade truck scale located in the northwestern portion of the Site will be removed. Imported
beneficial fill will be used to raise the northwestern portion of the Henkel property including the
location of the former R&D building by approximately one foot prior to capping with the parking lot
expansion. Significant soil excavation is not anticipated. Soil excavation activities will proceed only
to the minimum depth required to allow the installation of the new building foundations.
Additionally, limited soil excavation will be required to allow utility line installation and the
installation of a restaurant-style grease trap.

In accordance with the notification provisions on page 4 of this EMP, Flywheel will notify the
Brownfields Project Manager in writing before beginning demolition and renovations to the Site
structures which may involve disturbance to building slabs or soils. Redevelopment of the Site is
expected to occur in phases; however, currently no additional redevelopment is scheduled to occur
beyond those described above. Prior to each phase of redevelopment, an addendum to the EMP
will be submitted to the Brownfields Program and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager
before initiating the proposed work. The addendum will include the most up-to-date Site plans.
Demolition and construction plans for the redevelopment work covered in this EMP is included as
Appendix A and a grading plan is included as Appendix B.

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.
6
EMP Version 2, June 2018
5)Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
☒Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.
6)Which category of risk-based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
☒ Residential ☒ Non-Residential or Industrial/Commercial
7)Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a)Construction start date: 6/1/2019
b)Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
Redevelopment activities completed under the current phase of construction (activities
outlined above) are expected to take up to one year to complete. Demolition activities are
anticipated to begin in June 2019 followed by foundation work, utilities, and Site grading in
August 2019. Tenant upfit construction in the western portions of the former Henkel building
will be conducted concurrently with demolition and new construction activities. Completion
of shell construction is anticipated for June 2020. Note that these construction milestones are
subject to change.
c)Additional phases planned? ☐ Yes ☐ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date:
Planned Activity:
Additional phases of construction are anticipated for the northern (former Kaiser) portion of the
Site; however, construction plans have not been developed at this time.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
d)Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 6/1/2020
X

7
EMP Version 2, June 2018
CONTAMINATED MEDIA

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil:……………………………………….……………. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater:.……………………….……..……. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water:.……………...……..…………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment:.……………...……..…………………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor:…..…………...……..…………………. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 6. Sub-Slab Soil Vapor:……...……..…………….. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air:...……..…………………………………. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.

PART 1. Soil – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.

1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
As summarized in H&H’s Brownfields Assessment Report dated December 21, 2018, residual soil
impact in several areas may be present and include:

VOCs
Analytical results indicate that no VOCs were detected in any of the soil samples at concentrations
exceeding Residential or Industrial/Commercial PSRGs.

SVOCs
Analytical results indicate that the polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) benzo(a)anthracene
(1.2 mg/kg) and benzo(a)pyrene (0.47 mg/kg) were detected in soil sample HHSB-22 (Henkel;
former rail spur) at concentrations slightly above the Residential PSRGs of 1.1 mg/kg and 0.11
mg/kg, respectively (see Figure EMP-3). However, the duplicate soil sample collected at this
location (DUP-S2) did not exhibit concentrations of these two SVOCs at or above the laboratory
method detection limits. No other SVOCs were detected in the soil samples collected at
concentrations above Residential PSRGs and no concentrations were detected above
Industrial/Commercial PSRGs.

Metals
The results of the metals analyses indicate that concentrations of arsenic were detected above
laboratory reporting limits in each soil sample at concentrations ranging from 0.91 J mg/kg to 8.5
mg/kg and generally within the range of Site-specific background concentrations (3.1 mg/kg to 3.7

8
EMP Version 2, June 2018
mg/kg). Arsenic was detected in four samples at concentrations above the Site-specific background
range and the Industrial/Commercial PSRG of 3 mg/kg, including: HHSB-1 (8.5 mg/kg) and HHSB-7
(5.7 mg/kg) on the Kaiser portion of the Site (Figure EMP-2) and HHSB-18 (4.4 mg/kg) and HHSB-23
(5.6 mg/kg) on the Henkel portion of the Site (Figure EMP-3).

Analytical results indicate that concentrations of hexavalent chromium were detected in 25 of the
28 soil samples and each of the four background soil samples at concentrations ranging from 0.20 J
mg/kg to 2.31 mg/kg. Multiple soil samples contained hexavalent chromium detections at
concentrations above the Residential PSRG of 0.31 mg/kg but below the Industrial/Commercial
PSRG of 6.5 mg/kg. The hexavalent chromium detections were generally consistent in
concentration and were collected from depths ranging from zero to ten ft bgs from across the Site.
No other metals were detected in the soil samples collected at concentrations above background
and Industrial/Commercial PSRGs.

PCBs
Analytical results indicate that the PCB Aroclors 1242 and 1248 were detected in the northwestern
portion of the Henkel property (former R&D lab) at concentrations of up to 270 mg/kg (HHSB-15)
which exceeds the Residential PSRG of 0.23 mg/kg and the Industrial/Commercial PSRG of 0.95
mg/kg (Figure EMP-3). The HHSB-15 sample was collected from a depth of eight to ten ft bgs.
Based upon the HHSB-15 sample results, tiered step-out samples were collected in February 2019
to further delineate the “Area of Known PCB Contamination” in the northwestern portion of the
Site. The location of the former R&D lab building currently contains an unpaved grassy surface and
is proposed to be covered with up to one foot of imported beneficial fill and capped with pavement
during the planned parking lot expansion.

Additionally, the PCB Aroclor 1248 was detected in the southeastern portion of the Henkel
property (HHSB-27; abandoned catch basin) at a concentration of 250 mg/kg, which exceeds the
Residential PSRG of 0.23mg/kg the Industrial/Commercial PSRG of 0.96 mg/kg. The HHSB-27
sample was collected from a depth of five to seven ft bgs. Based upon the HHSB-27 sample results,
tiered step-out samples were collected in February 2019 to further delineate the “Area of Known
PCB Contamination” in the southeastern portion of the Site. The former catch basin located
adjacent to HHSB-27 has been abandoned (filled with concrete) and the surrounding area is
covered with asphalt pavement. Current redevelopment plans indicate no proposed construction
in this portion of the Site.

The areas containing elevated PCB concentrations are labeled “Areas of Known PCB
Contamination” on the attached Figure EMP-3.

Laboratory analytical results of the soil samples collected at the Site during previous Brownfields
assessment activities are summarized in Table 1. Sample locations are presented on Figures EMP-2
and EMP-3.

9
EMP Version 2, June 2018
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Residual PCB soil impact in the “Areas of Known PCB Contamination” (northwestern and
southeastern portions of the Henkel property) ranges from approximately five to ten ft bgs.
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
Approximately 89,300 square feet (2.05 acres) will be disturbed during Site redevelopment. As
indicated above, with northwestern portion of the Henkel property will be raised with up to one
foot of beneficial fill. Grading activities will be conducted in accordance with applicable local, state,
and federal regulations including submittal of an erosion control plan to Mecklenburg County. The
grading contractor will utilize grading equipment (i.e., backhoes, front end loaders, bull dozers,
etc.) and will implement best management practices (i.e., installation of silt fencing) to manage soil
on-Site during Site redevelopment activities.

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
The following planned redevelopment activities will require soils to be temporarily exposed:
1) Warehouse #2 building demolition including slab removal and uncovering building footers for
removal and replacement (anticipated to be approximately 4 to 5 ft bgs);
2) removing the subgrade truck scale (anticipated to be approximately 4 ft bgs); and
3) installing a subgrade grease trap (anticipated to be up to 5 ft bgs).

5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
N/A – Soil removed for the above purposes is expected to be minimal in volume and will be
redistributed in the area in which it was removed and covered with clean fill, an impervious
surface, or building. In general, concrete pavement/slab/footers will be cleaned using dry methods
(e.g. broom swept) to remove adhered residual soils prior to disposal. Note that soil excavation in
the “Areas of Known PCB Contamination” are not anticipated. If soil or concrete from the “Areas of
Known PCB Contamination” are moved to another portion of the Site in the future, prior approval
will be obtained from DEQ Brownfields and the Brownfields plat will be revised. A grading plan is
included as Appendix B.
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
Excavation of impacted soil is not anticipated.

7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
No soil is currently planned to be disposed off-Site. Some concrete may be disposed off-Site. If
contaminated concrete is disposed off-Site, it will be handled in accordance with applicable local,
state, and federal disposal regulations and disposal documentation will be maintained.

10
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ☐Yes ☒No
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Please note that while not defined as a Listed Hazardous Waste under 40 CFR Part
261.31-261.35, disposal of PCB-contaminated soil with concentrations of 50 mg/kg
or greater are regulated under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA)
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and are excluded from Subtitle D Municipal
Solid Waste Landfills (MSWLFs).

☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained-Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained-In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes ☐ No

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED-OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED-IN POLICY THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes ☒ No
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
☐ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ TCLP results
☒ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
Click or tap here to enter
text.

☒ If no, explain rationale:

11
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Soil analytical data does not indicate detections capable of exceeding TCLP criteria
using the Rule of 20 and does not contain a Listed Waste as defined in the North
Carolina Hazardous Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35. Please note
that previous assessment has indicated the presence of PCB-impacted soils in two
portions of the Site (see Figure EMP-3) that are subject to disposal under the EPA
TSCA guidance. However, PCBs are not included on the TCLP list.

d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
☒ Preliminary Health-Based Residential SRGs
☒ Preliminary Health-Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
☒ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
☐ Site-specific risk-based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Click or tap here to enter text.

Additional comments:
Currently, redevelopment of the Site is intended for commercial purposes only; however, future
development may include residential use.

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known
☒ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
Demarcation geotextile or fencing
☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☒
☒ Describe cap or fill:
Potential impacted soil (if encountered) may be placed below impervious surface (i.e.
pavement, building or hardscaping) or below compacted clean fill, with prior approval by DEQ
Brownfields.

12
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-recorded if
actions are Post-Recordation).
☒ GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
☐ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:

4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken
during and following excavation and management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
☒ Yes, describe the method will include:
The construction contractor will consider conditions such as wind speed, wind direction, and
moisture content of soil during surface removal and repaving activities to minimize dust
generation. In the event that contaminated soil is encountered during Site redevelopment
that requires excavation, particular attention will be paid by contractors to implement dust
control measures as needed based on Site and atmospheric conditions (i.e. by controlled
water application, hydro-seeding, and/or mulch, stone, or plastic cover). Potentially impacted
soil will be managed as described below.

☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter
text.

Field Screening of site soil
☒ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
During soil disturbance, the workers or contractors will observe soils for evidence of a
distinct unnatural color, strong odor, sheen, or fill disposed materials of concerns (i.e., dried
sludge, chemicals, tanks, drums, subsurface piping, etc.). Should the above be noted during
site work, the contractor will contact the project environmental professional to observe the
suspect condition. If the environmental professional confirms that the material may be
impacted (using field observations and screening with a photo-ionization detector [PID]),
then the soils will be managed in accordance with this EMP and the Brownfields Program
Project Manager will be contacted within 48 hours to advise of the condition.
Workers conducting soil disturbance activities in the “Areas of Known PCB Contamination”
(as defined on Figure EMP-3) should don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) to
reduce the potential for dermal contact with residual soils (e.g. nitrile gloves, long sleeves,
etc.). An environmental professional will be on-Site when soil disturbance activities are being
conducted in the “Areas of Known PCB Contamination” located in the northwestern and
southeastern portions of the Henkel property.

☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter
text.
Click or tap here to enter
text.

13
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Soil Sample Collection
☒ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in-situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
Site redevelopment plans for the former Kaiser Fluids portion of the Site have not yet been
determined. Once redevelopment plans are available, additional soil assessment may be
warranted in that portion of the Brownfields Property prior to future construction activities.
If additional soil assessment is warranted for the former Kaiser Fluids portion of the Site, a
Work Plan will be prepared for DEQ review and approval.

☒ No, explain rationale:
Collection of additional soil samples is not anticipated at this time in the former Henkel
portion of the Site. H&H conducted Brownfields Assessment activities at the Site in October
2018 and February 2019. The February 2019 assessment included the collection of discrete
soil samples from areas of the Henkel portion of the Site that are anticipated to be
temporarily exposed as a result of construction and demolition activities (new building
addition and Warehouse #3) for soil characterization and worker protection purposes. A
summary report is being prepared that documents the methods and results of the February
2019 assessment activities. The report will be sealed by a North Carolina Professional
Engineer or Licensed Geologist and submitted to DEQ under separate cover. A summary of
the analytical results from the October 2018 and February 2019 assessments are included in
the attached tables.

If significant soil impact is encountered during redevelopment activities, excavation will
proceed only as far as needed to allow construction to continue and/or to allow the
alternate corrective measures described below. Suspect significantly impacted soil
excavated during grading and/or utility line installation or removal may be stockpiled and
covered in a secure area to allow construction to progress. Suspect impacted soil will be
underlain by and covered with minimum 10-mil plastic sheeting. At least one representative
sample of the soil will be collected for analysis of total VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA metals plus
hexavalent chromium, and PCBs. If the results of analysis of the sample indicate that the
soil could potentially exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria, then the soil
will also be analyzed by TCLP for those compounds that could exceed the toxicity
characteristic hazardous waste criteria. Impacted soil will be handled in the manner
described below based upon the laboratory analyses:

i. If no organic compounds are detected in a sample (other than which are attributable
to sampling or laboratory artifacts) and metals are below Residential PSRGs or are
consistent with Site-specific background levels, then the soil will be deemed suitable for use
as on-Site fill or as off-Site fill. The proposed location(s) for off-Site placement of soil (other
than a permitted facility) along with the receiving facility’s written approval for acceptance
of the soil will be provided to DEQ for approval prior to taking the soil off-Site.

14
EMP Version 2, June 2018

ii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed the Residential
PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are
consistent with background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations are below
hazardous waste criteria, then the soil may be used on-Site as fill without conditions.

iii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the Residential PSRGs
(other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are
consistent with background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations are below
hazardous waste criteria, then the soil, with DEQ’s written approval, may be used on-Site as
fill below an impervious surface (i.e. parking lot), or below at least 2 ft of compacted clean
soil. If the impacted soil with concentrations above Residential PSRGs is moved to an on-
Site location, its location and depth will be documented, covered with a geotextile fabric so
that its location can be identified if encountered in the future, and its location will be
provided to DEQ in an updated survey plat.

iv. Impacted soil may be transported to a permitted facility such as a landfill provided
that the soil is accepted at the disposal facility. If soil is transported to a permitted facility,
the permitted facility’s written approval to dispose of soil from the Site will be included with
the final redevelopment summary report. In the event that the sample data indicates
concentrations above TCLP hazardous waste criteria, then the soil must be transported off-
Site to a permitted disposal facility that can accept or treat hazardous waste.

If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): EPA Methods 6020/7471
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): EPA Method 8082. A sample will also be collected for possible analysis of PCB congeners according to EPA Method 1668 based on the results of the 8082 analysis.
☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199

☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion

15
EMP Version 2, June 2018
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:

☒ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): EPA Methods 6020/7471
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): EPA Method 8082
☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199

Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, a work plan for
final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover. Following completion of soil disturbance for any future Site development (i.e. after grading and utility construction), an environmental professional will be contracted to assess the Site for areas that are not covered with a minimum of 2 ft of clean fill soil or topsoil from a landscaping company, building foundations, sidewalks, permanent hardscape, or asphalt or concrete parking areas, driveways or other impervious surfaces. If such areas exist, a Work Plan will be prepared for final grade sampling for DEQ review and approval. If no such areas exist, documentation will be provided to DEQ.

☐ If final grade sampling was NOT selected please explain rationale:

Click or tap here to enter
text.

16
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Part 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL

NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner.”

Requirements for importing fill:

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
Approximately 2,500 cubic yards of beneficial fill are anticipated to be imported to the Site to
achieve the desired grades. Additionally, the PD plans to import limited amounts of organic rich
topsoil from a commercial landscape material vendor for use in proposed landscaped areas.

3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range
of depths, please list the range.)
Beneficial fill will be used to raise the grade by up to one foot in the far northwestern portion of the
Henkel property (former R&D building location).

4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
The source of fill has not been determined at this time. However, when a proposed source of fill has
been identified, the procedures outlined below will be followed.

5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use at the Brownfields property.
To demonstrate that imported soil is suitable for use at commercial property, the fill soil will be
sampled and approved by DEQ Brownfields prior to being brought to the Site. A sampling plan will
be developed and submitted for DEQ Brownfields review under separate cover. DEQ approval of
the sampling plan and analytical results is required prior to bringing soil on Site. Soil will be
considered suitable for use at the Site if it does not contain compound concentrations above
Residential PSRGs or Site-specific background levels for metals.

6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): EPA Methods 6020/7471

17
EMP Version 2, June 2018

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Hexavalent Chromium (EPA Method 7199)

7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in-situ
borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought
onto the Brownfields Property.
A sampling plan will be developed and submitted for DEQ Brownfields review under separate cover.
DEQ Brownfields approval of the sampling plan and analytical results is required prior to bringing
soil on Site. If virgin fill materials are cut from an established commercial quarry (such as Vulcan
Materials – Pineville or Martin Marietta – Beatties Ford Road), then with DEQ approval, sampling
may not be necessary based on the results of previous sampling for other Brownfields properties. If
virgin materials cut from an established commercial quarry are not utilized for the import soil, then
soil sample(s) will be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium,
chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver) plus hexavalent chromium. Soil will be considered
suitable for use at the Site if it does not contain compound concentrations above DEQ Residential
PSRGs or Site-specific background levels for metals.

Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.

1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.
Export soil is not anticipated at this time. Should soil need to be exported from the Brownfields
property during redevelopment, a sampling plan will be developed and submitted to DEQ
Brownfields for review and approval once the volume of soil for export is known. Generally, soil
samples will be collected from export soil at a rate of 1 sample per every 400-500 cubic yards of
export.

18
EMP Version 2, June 2018

DEQ approval of the sampling plan and analytical results will be obtained prior to transporting
export soil from the Site. Based on analytical results from the export soil, the soil will be
transported off-Site to a suitable location. The PD will notify DEQ Brownfields of the location
receiving the export soil. If not a permitted facility, DEQ Brownfields approval and written approval
from the receiving facility will be obtained prior to transporting the soil off-Site.

2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
☒ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
☒ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting Landfill;
☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility
☒ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property – determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and that a record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
☒ Use as Beneficial Fill off-site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.

3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).
The environmental professional will contact DEQ Brownfields to obtain DEQ Brownfields and DEQ
Solid Waste approval prior to exporting soil to a non-Brownfields property.

Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES

☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)

☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original
depth from which it was excavated.

☒ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials:

19
EMP Version 2, June 2018

☒ If no, include rationale here:
Based on the redevelopment plans, utility trenches are not anticipated in the “Areas of Known PCB
Contamination”. Additionally, the results of previous vapor intrusion assessment conducted at the
Site in January 2018, October 2018, and February 2019 indicated that vapor mitigation is not
warranted in the Henkel portion of the Site based on the acceptable calculated carcinogenic and
non-carcinogenic risks under both residential and non-residential use scenarios.

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Although not anticipated, in the event contaminated soil and/or vapors are encountered in utility
trenches during redevelopment activities, the trench will be evacuated, and appropriate safety
screening of the vapors will be performed to protect workers. If results indicate further action is
warranted in response to vapors to protect workers, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of
industrial fans) will be implemented.

The contractor and workers will observe soil for potential impacts during utility installation activities.
Evidence of potential significant impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or
previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e. chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be
noted during utility work, the contractor will contact the environmental professional to observe the
suspect condition and screen the soil using a PID or similar vapor field screening instrument. If the
environmental professional confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures outlined
in Part 1.A. above will be implemented. In addition, the environmental professional will contact the DEQ
Brownfields project manager within two business days to advise that person of the condition.

PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below.
1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
Depth to groundwater ranges from approximately 10 ft bgs in the southern portion of the Site to
approximately 18 ft bgs in the northwestern portion of the Site (see Table 2).
2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☒onsite ☐offsite ☐both or ☐unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
Groundwater impacts are likely to be the result of previous Site operations. Previous groundwater
assessment activities have indicated the presence of groundwater impacts above 2L Standards are
present in the central portion of the Site in the area north of the Henkel building and in the vicinity
of the former Kaiser loading dock. The VOC 1,4-dioxane was detected in both the Henkel and
Kaiser portions of the Site above 2L Standards. TCE and vinyl chloride were detected in one
groundwater sample collected near the former Kaiser loading dock at concentrations above 2L
Standards. Of the compounds detected above 2L Standards, only the TCE detection from the
former Kaiser loading dock was above the Residential GWSL.

20
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Elevated concentrations of chromium (total) were detected above the 2L Standard in the vicinity of
the former Henkel R&D lab and the former Kaiser settling tank excavation area. In October 2018,
mercury was detected in groundwater in the area north of the Henkel building (MW-3) at a
concentration above the 2L Standard and GWSLs. However, MW-3 was resampled in February
2019 and the results indicated that mercury was not detected above the laboratory method
detection limit in MW-3 (or duplicate sample). Groundwater laboratory analytical results are
summarized in Table 3.

3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
During previous groundwater assessment, the hydraulic gradient at the Site was generally
determined to be to the northwest towards Little Sugar Creek.
4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
☐Yes ☒No
If yes, describe these activities:
Click or tap here to enter
text.
Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or sampling procedures).
Based on the historical depth to groundwater, groundwater is not anticipated to be encountered
during proposed redevelopment activities. Although not anticipated, if groundwater suspected to
be impacted (based on strong odor, unnatural color, sheen, etc.) is encountered during Site work,
the contractor will contact the environmental professional to observe the suspect condition. If the
environmental professional determines that the excavation likely contains impacted groundwater,
then appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken to manage groundwater that gathers
in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted during construction activities.
The accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate (if feasible), tested and disposed off-Site (if
impacted), or used for dust control at the Site (with Brownfields prior approval). In addition, the
environmental professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within 48 hours
regarding the condition.

5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☒Yes ☐No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes ☒No

6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
☒ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program’s intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.

21
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☒ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
☒ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
☒ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.

7) Please provide additional details as needed:

Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.

PART 3. SURFACE WATER -Please fill out the information below.
1) Is surface water present at the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes ☒ No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
If surface water run-off gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted
during construction activities, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken. The
accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate (if feasible), tested and disposed off-Site (if
impacted based on strong odor, unnatural color, sheen, etc.), or used for dust control at the Site
(with Brownfields prior approval). In addition, the environmental professional will contact the DEQ
Brownfields project manager within 48 hours regarding the condition.

PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below.

1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No
Existing monitoring wells on the Henkel portion of the Site will be abandoned as part of the current
phase of redevelopment. Existing monitoring wells on the Kaiser portion of the Site will be marked and
protected from disturbance at this time. DEQ approval will be obtained prior to abandoning wells at the
Site. The locations of the monitoring wells are provided on Figure EMP-2 and Figure EMP-3.

22
EMP Version 2, June 2018

2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☐ No

3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No

4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.

5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):

PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below.
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
Groundwater:.….☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
Groundwater:…..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?

4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities
(trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management
of such contact:
In the event contaminated soil vapors are encountered during redevelopment activities, the
excavation area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be
performed. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such
as use of industrial fans) will be implemented. In addition, the environmental professional will
contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within 48 hours regarding the condition.

Contaminated soil vapor has been identified at depths ranging from approximately 10 ft to 15 ft bgs in
the northern portion of the Kaiser property and the western portion of the Henkel property. Soil gas
laboratory analytical results are summarized in Table 4.

23
EMP Version 2, June 2018

PART 6. SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.
1) Are sub-slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
2) If data indicate that sub-slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map
showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub-slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☒0-6 inches ☐Other, please
describe:
Sub-slab vapor laboratory analytical results are summarized in Table 5 and presented of Figure EMP-
2 and Figure EMP-3.

4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub-slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
In the event that contaminated soil vapors are encountered during future redevelopment
activities, the area will be evacuated, and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be
performed. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such
as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.

PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below.

1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk-based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:

Indoor air samples were collected from the Henkel building in February 2019 and analyzed for mercury
by NIOSH Method 6009. The results of the indoor air sampling did not indicate mercury at
concentrations above the laboratory method detection limits in any of the three samples (or duplicate
sample) collected.

24
EMP Version 2, June 2018
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM – Please fill out the information below.
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☒ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
The results of previous vapor intrusion assessments conducted in January 2018, October 2018, and
February 2019 indicated that vapor mitigation is not warranted in the Henkel portion of the Site
based on the acceptable calculated carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks under both residential
and non-residential use scenarios. However, the results of the cumulative risk calculations for the
Kaiser portion of the Site indicate acceptable carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks under a non-
residential use scenario but indicate unacceptable risk (Hazard Index > 1) under a residential use
scenario. Therefore, future residential development in the Kaiser portion of the Site will warrant
vapor mitigation controls or additional assessment to further evaluate the potential vapor intrusion
into future buildings in this area of the Site.

The potential for vapor intrusion associated with future Site buildings in the Kaiser portion of the
Site will be managed through a Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) Plan that will be sealed
by a NC Professional Engineer and submitted to DEQ for approval under separate cover prior to
construction of future proposed Site buildings. VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
Click or tap here to enter
text.

CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials

In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site-specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:

25
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
EPA Method 6010 and Method 7471)

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EPA Method 8082. A sample will also be collected for possible analysis of PCB congeners
according to EPA Method 1668 based on the results of the 8082 analysis.

☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Hexavalent chromium by EPA Method 7199 Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
During construction activities, contractors may encounter unknown sub-surface environmental
conditions (i.e. tanks, drums, or waste materials) that if encountered, will require proper
management. Prior to beginning Site work, H&H will attend a pre-construction kick-off meeting with
the PD and the redevelopment contractors to discuss the DEQ approved EMP and various scenarios
when it would be appropriate and necessary to notify H&H of the discovery of unknown subsurface
features or potentially impacted media at the Site.

In the event that such conditions are encountered during Site redevelopment activities, the
environmental actions noted below will be used to direct environmental actions to be taken during
these activities and sampling data for potentially impacted soil and the disposition of impacted soil will
be provided to DEQ when the data becomes available.

Underground Storage Tanks:
In the event a previously unidentified UST or impacts associated with a UST release are discovered at
the Site during redevelopment activities, the UST and/or UST related impacts will be addressed
through the Brownfields Program.

If a UST is encountered, the UST will be removed and transported off-Site for disposal at a suitable
facility. If the UST contains residual fluids, the fluids will be sampled for disposal characterization, and
transported off-Site for disposal at a suitable facility based on the laboratory analytical results prior to
removing the UST from the ground. If a UST is encountered that cannot be removed or does not
require removal for geotechnical or construction purposes, with DEQ prior approval it will be
abandoned in-place and construction will proceed. Where appropriate, the bottom may be
penetrated before abandonment to prevent fluid accumulation. Impacted soil in the vicinity of the
26
EMP Version 2, June 2018
UST will be managed in accordance with Part 1.A. above
Sub-Grade Feature/Pit:
If a sub-grade feature or pit is encountered and does not require removal for geotechnical or
construction purposes, it will be filled with soil or suitable fill and construction will proceed. Where
appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before back filling to prevent fluid accumulation. If the
pit has waste in it, the waste may be set aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste disposal
purposes for TCLP VOCs, SVOCs, metals, and PCBs and disposed off-Site at a permitted facility or the
waste will be managed in accordance with Part 1.A. above, whichever is most applicable based on the
type of waste present. If the pit must be removed and the observed waste characteristics indicate the
concrete may potentially be contaminated to a significant degree, the concrete will be sampled and
analyzed by methods specified by the disposal facility.
Buried Waste Material:
If excavation into buried wastes or significantly impacted soils occurs, the contractor is instructed to
stop work in that location and notify the environmental professional. The environmental professional
will review the materials and collect samples if warranted. In this event, confirmation sampling will be
conducted at representative locations in the base and the sidewalls of the excavation after the waste
or significantly impacted soil is removed. The confirmation samples will be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs,
RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium, and PCBs. Areas of suspected contaminated soil that remain
at the Site after excavation is complete above the Residential PSRGs will be managed pursuant to this
plan and incorporated into the Brownfields plat.
Re-Use of Impacted Soils On-Site:
Please refer to the description outlined in Part 1.A
above.
If unknown, impacted soil is identified on-site, management on-site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on-site.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:

27
EMP Version 2, June 2018
POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING

☒ Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 1/31/2020

The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment-related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).

☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement.

29
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Tables
Table 1Summary of Soil Analytical Results Kaiser Fluids Tech IICharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. AMK-011Portion of SiteArea of ConcernFormer TCE DegreaserPaint Booth SumpFormer Boiler RoomFormer Tooling / MillingSample IDHHSB-29 HHSB-30 HHSB-31 HHSB-32 HHSB-1 HHSB-2 HHSB-3 HHSB-4 HHSB-5 HHSB-6 HHSB-7 HHSB-8 HHSB-9 HHSB-10Date10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/1/2018Depth* (ft bgs)0-2 0-2 0-2 0-20-2 4-6 0-2 2-4 0-2 2-4 6-8 2-4 2-4 2-4VOCs (8260) mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethane3.817NANANANA<0.00016 <0.00013 <0.00015 <0.00014 <0.00014 <0.00015 <0.00013 <0.00014 <0.000130.035 0.019 0.0491,1-Dichloroethylene48210NANANANA<0.00026 <0.00020 <0.00023 <0.00022 <0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00021 <0.00022 <0.000200.072 0.059 0.121,2,3-Trichlorobenzene13190NANANANA<0.00033 <0.00026 <0.00030 <0.00028 <0.00029 <0.00030 <0.00027 <0.00029 <0.00026 <0.00034 <0.00029 <0.000341,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1255NANANANA<0.00043 <0.00033 <0.00039 <0.00037 <0.00039 <0.00039 <0.00036 <0.00038 <0.00034 <0.00044 <0.00038 <0.000451,2-Dichlorobenzene 380 2,000NANANANA<0.00027 <0.00021 <0.00025 <0.00023 <0.00024 <0.00025 <0.00023 <0.00024 <0.00022 <0.00028 <0.00024 <0.000281,3-Dichlorobenzene NS NSNANANANA<0.00039 <0.00030 <0.00035 <0.00033 <0.00034 <0.00035 <0.00032 <0.00033 <0.00030 <0.00039 <0.00034 <0.000401,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.8 12NANANANA<0.00023 <0.00018 <0.00021 <0.00020 <0.00020 <0.00021 <0.00019 <0.00020 <0.00018 <0.00023 <0.00020 <0.000241,4-Dioxane 5.4 25NANANANA<0.012 <0.0091 <0.011 <0.010 <0.0100.12<0.0097 <0.010 <0.00920.12 0.026 J 0.13Acetone12,000140,000NANANANA0.12 0.061<0.0013 <0.0012 <0.0013 <0.00130.017 J<0.0012 <0.0011 <0.00140.015 J<0.0015Benzene 1.2 5.4NANANANA<0.00034 <0.00026 <0.00030 <0.00029 <0.00030 <0.00031 <0.00028 <0.00029 <0.00027 <0.00034 <0.00030 <0.00035Bromomethane1.46.4NANANANA0.0028 J<0.00055 <0.00065 <0.00061 <0.00064 <0.00065 <0.00059 <0.00062 <0.00056 <0.00073 <0.00063 <0.00074Carbon Disulfide 160 740NANANANA<0.00029 <0.00022 <0.00026 <0.00024 <0.00025 <0.00026 <0.00024 <0.00025 <0.00022 <0.00029 <0.00025 <0.00029Chlorobenzene 58 280NANANANA<0.00031 <0.00024 <0.00028 <0.00026 <0.00028 <0.00028 <0.00026 <0.00027 <0.00024 <0.00031 <0.00027 <0.00032cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 31 470NANANANA<0.00025 <0.00019 <0.00022 <0.00021 <0.000220.14 0.071<0.00022 <0.000191.6 0.18 0.13trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 310 4,700NANANANA<0.00035 <0.00027 <0.00031 <0.00030 <0.00031 <0.00031 <0.00029 <0.00030 <0.000270.011 0.006 0.012Ethylbenzene6.127NANANANA<0.00022 <0.00017 <0.00020 <0.00019 <0.00020 <0.00020 <0.00019 <0.00019 <0.00018 <0.00023 <0.00020 <0.00023Methylcyclohexane 1,400 5,800NANANANA<0.00050 <0.00038 <0.00045 <0.00042 <0.00044 <0.000450.0047 J<0.00043 <0.00039 <0.000500.0022 J<0.00051Methyl Acetate 16,000 230,000NANANANA<0.00088 <0.00068 <0.00079 <0.00075 <0.00078 <0.00079 <0.00073 <0.00076 <0.00069 <0.00089 <0.00078 <0.00091Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)5,50040,000NANANANA<0.00053 <0.00041 <0.00047 <0.00045 <0.00047 <0.00048 <0.00044 <0.00046 <0.00041 <0.00053 <0.00046 <0.00054Methyl Isobutyl Ketone7,00030,000NANANANA<0.00050 <0.00038 <0.00045 <0.00042 <0.00044 <0.00045 <0.00041 <0.00043 <0.00039 <0.00050 <0.00044 <0.00051Trichloroethylene0.874.0NANANANA<0.00038 <0.00029 <0.00034 <0.00032 <0.000340.19<0.00031 <0.00033 <0.000300.0094 0.17 0.57Vinyl Chloride0.0611.7NANANANA<0.00028 <0.00022 <0.00025 <0.00024 <0.00025 <0.00025 <0.00023 <0.00024 <0.000220.016 0.027 0.053m,p-Xylenes120500NANANANA<0.00054 <0.00041 <0.00048 <0.00046 <0.00048 <0.00049 <0.00044 <0.00047 <0.00042 <0.00054 <0.00047 <0.00055o-Xylene140590NANANANA<0.00024 <0.00018 <0.00021 <0.00020 <0.00021 <0.00022 <0.00020 <0.00021 <0.00019 <0.00024 <0.00021 <0.00025PCBs (8082)Aroclor 12420.230.95NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANAAroclor 12480.230.96NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANASVOCs (8270) mg/kg2-Methylnaphthalene48600NANANANA<0.065 <0.064 <0.072 <0.063 <0.059 <0.072 <0.066 <0.069 <0.067 <0.075 <0.072 <0.073Acenaphthene7209,000NANANANA<0.055 <0.055 <0.061 <0.054 <0.050 <0.062 <0.056 <0.059 <0.057 <0.064 <0.062 <0.066Benzo(a)anthracene 1.1 21NANANANA<0.053 <0.053 <0.059 <0.052 <0.049 <0.059 <0.054 <0.057 <0.055 <0.061 <0.059 <0.063Benzo(a)pyrene 0.11 2.1NANANANA<0.044 <0.043 <0.048 <0.043 <0.040 <0.049 <0.045 <0.047 <0.045 <0.051 <0.049 <0.052Benzo(b)fluoranthene1.121NANANANA<0.047 <0.047 <0.052 <0.046 <0.043 <0.053 <0.048 <0.050 <0.048 <0.054 <0.052 <0.056Benzo(g,h,i)peryleneNSNSNANANANA<0.045 <0.044 <0.049 <0.043 <0.041 <0.050 <0.045 <0.048 <0.046 <0.051 <0.050 <0.053Chrysene 110 2,100NANANANA<0.051 <0.051 <0.056 <0.050 <0.047 <0.057 <0.052 <0.055 <0.053 <0.059 <0.057 <0.061Fluoranthene 480 6,000NANANANA<0.052 <0.051 <0.057 <0.051 <0.047 <0.058 <0.053 <0.055 <0.053 <0.060 <0.058 <0.062Fluorene 480 6,000NANANANA<0.058 <0.058 <0.064 <0.057 <0.053 <0.065 <0.059 <0.062 <0.060 <0.067 <0.065 <0.070Pentachlorophenol 1.0 4.0NANANANA<0.048 <0.047 <0.053 <0.047 <0.044 <0.054 <0.049 <0.051 <0.049 <0.055 <0.053 <0.057Penenathrene NS NSNANANANA<0.053 <0.052 <0.058 <0.051 <0.048 <0.059 <0.054 <0.056 <0.054 <0.061 <0.059 <0.063Pyrene364,500NANANANA<0.054 <0.053 <0.059 <0.052 <0.049 <0.060 <0.054 <0.057 <0.055 <0.062 <0.060 <0.064Metals (6020/7471/7199) mg/kgArsenic0.68 3.03.1 B 3.3 B 3.7 B 3.3 B8.53.32.82.41.5 J3.15.72.01.6 J2.73.52.9Barium3,100 47,00065 E 79 E 62 58 92 40 92 57 51 32 140 57 76 73 330 67Cadmium14 2000.38 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 0.88 J, BL, B 0.19 J 0.030 J 0.042 J 0.031 J 0.037 J 0.038 J 0.13 J 0.038 J 0.070 J 0.063 J 0.21 J 0.059 JChromium (Total)NS NS46 35 50 37 19 33 39 44 19 33 64 57 40 50 52 59Hexavalent Chromium0.31 6.50.18 J 0.38 J 0.44 J 0.25 J1.50.25 J0.48 J0.20 J0.54 0.61 J<0.570.33 J0.58<0.641.04 0.57 JTrivalent Chromium**23,000350,00045.8234.6249.5636.7517.5 32.75 38.52 43.8 18.46 32.396456.67 39.425050.96 58.43Lead400800305.8148.79.1108.64.41.66.8227.13.79.4128.3Mercury2.39.70.0370.014 J0.0280.022 J 0.022 J 0.068 0.075 0.16 0.0039 J 0.098 0.028 0.046 0.029 0.057 0.100.27Selenium781,2003.9 Ac, B 6.7 Ac, B 5.3 Ac, B 2.9 Ac, B1.8 0.68 J 1.3 J1.5 0.44 J 1.2 J5.41.1 J1.81.3 J1.8 2.0 J, AaSilver781,2000.078 J0.20 J0.18 J0.15 J0.14 J 0.026 J<0.026 <0.023 <0.021 <0.0260.062 J<0.025 <0.024 <0.0270.059 J 0.036 JNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Health Based Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (February 2018)* = VOCs were collected as grab samples from within the specified interval**Trivalent Chromium = Chromium (Total) - Hexavalent Chromium*** Two values were reported by the laboratory for detections of hexavalent chromium. Only the higher of the two values is shown on this table. BOLD indicates concentration exceeds the Residential PSRGs and background for metalsUnderline indicates concentration exceeds the Industrial/Commercial PSRGs and background for metalsSoil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parenthesesVOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compoundsNA = not analyzed; NS = not specified; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; -- = not applicableAa = Final CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.Ab = Initial CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.Ac = Initial LLICV recovery outside the control limits. Result may have a low bias.B = Analyte is found in the associated blank. E = Estimated concentration above the calibration range.J = Detected but below the reporting limits. The concentration reported is an estimate. Screening CriteriaResidential PSRGs (1)(mg/kg)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)(mg/kg)4-6HHSB-11 / DUP-S1Site Specific BackgroundFormer Kaiser TechnologiesNorthern Portion of SiteLoading Dock10/1/2018S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables4/23/2019Table 1 (Page 1 of 5)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1Summary of Soil Analytical Results Kaiser Fluids Tech IICharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. AMK-011Portion of SiteArea of ConcernSample IDHHSB-29 HHSB-30 HHSB-31 HHSB-32Date10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018Depth* (ft bgs)0-20-20-20-2VOCs (8260) mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethane3.817NANANANA1,1-Dichloroethylene48210NANANANA1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene13190NANANANA1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1255NANANANA1,2-Dichlorobenzene3802,000NANANANA1,3-DichlorobenzeneNSNSNANANANA1,4-Dichlorobenzene2.812NANANANA1,4-Dioxane5.425NANANANAAcetone12,000140,000NANANANABenzene1.25.4NANANANABromomethane1.46.4NANANANACarbon Disulfide160740NANANANAChlorobenzene58280NANANANAcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene31470NANANANAtrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene3104,700NANANANAEthylbenzene6.127NANANANAMethylcyclohexane1,4005,800NANANANAMethyl Acetate16,000230,000NANANANAMethyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)5,50040,000NANANANAMethyl Isobutyl Ketone7,00030,000NANANANATrichloroethylene0.874.0NANANANAVinyl Chloride0.0611.7NANANANAm,p-Xylenes120500NANANANAo-Xylene140590NANANANAPCBs (8082)Aroclor 12420.230.95NANANANAAroclor 12480.230.96NANANANASVOCs (8270) mg/kg2-Methylnaphthalene48600NANANANAAcenaphthene7209,000NANANANABenzo(a)anthracene1.121NANANANABenzo(a)pyrene0.112.1NANANANABenzo(b)fluoranthene1.121NANANANABenzo(g,h,i)peryleneNSNSNANANANAChrysene1102,100NANANANAFluoranthene4806,000NANANANAFluorene4806,000NANANANAPentachlorophenol1.04.0NANANANAPenenathreneNSNSNANANANAPyrene364,500NANANANAMetals (6020/7471/7199) mg/kgArsenic0.68 3.03.1 B 3.3 B 3.7 B 3.3 BBarium3,100 47,00065 E 79 E 62 58Cadmium14 2000.38 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 0.88 J, BL, BChromium (Total)NS NS46 35 50 37Hexavalent Chromium0.31 6.50.18 J 0.38 J 0.44 J 0.25 JTrivalent Chromium**23,000350,00045.8234.6249.5636.75Lead400800305.8148.7Mercury2.39.70.0370.014 J0.0280.022 JSelenium781,2003.9 Ac, B 6.7 Ac, B 5.3 Ac, B 2.9 Ac, BSilver781,2000.078 J0.20 J0.18 J0.15 JNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Health Based Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (February 2018)* = VOCs were collected as grab samples from within the specified interval**Trivalent Chromium = Chromium (Total) - Hexavalent Chromium*** Two values were reported by the laboratory for detections of hexavalent chromium. Only the higher of the two values is shown on this table. BOLD indicates concentration exceeds the Residential PSRGs and background for metalsUnderline indicates concentration exceeds the Industrial/Commercial PSRGs and background for metalsSoil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parenthesesVOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compoundsNA = not analyzed; NS = not specified; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; -- = not applicableAa = Final CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.Ab = Initial CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.Ac = Initial LLICV recovery outside the control limits. Result may have a low bias.B = Analyte is found in the associated blank. E = Estimated concentration above the calibration range.J = Detected but below the reporting limits. The concentration reported is an estimate. Screening CriteriaResidential PSRGs (1)(mg/kg)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)(mg/kg)Site Specific BackgroundNorthwest Portion of SiteHHSB-12 HHSB-13 HHSB-14 HHSB-15HHSB-1610/3/2018 10/1/2018 10/1/2018 10/1/2018 2/6/2019 2/6/2019 2/6/20192/6/2019 2/6/2019 2/6/2019 2/6/2019 2/6/2019 2/6/2019 10/3/20188-104-60-48-100-48-100-30-48-100-48-100-28-100-2<0.00016 <0.00014 <0.00020 <0.00018NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00015<0.00025 <0.00022 <0.00032 <0.00029NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00025<0.00032 <0.00028 <0.00041 <0.00037NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00032<0.00042 <0.00037 <0.00053 <0.00048NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00041<0.00027 <0.00023 <0.00034 <0.00030NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00026<0.00037 <0.00033 <0.00047 <0.00043NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00037<0.00022 <0.00020 <0.00028 <0.00026NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00022<0.011 <0.010 <0.014 <0.013NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.011<0.0014 <0.00120.096<0.0016NANANANANANANANANANANA0.085<0.00033 <0.00029 <0.00042 <0.00038NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00032<0.00070 <0.00062 <0.00088 <0.00080NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00069<0.00028 <0.00024 <0.00035 <0.00032NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00027<0.00030 <0.00026 <0.00038 <0.00034NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00030<0.00024 <0.00021 <0.00030 <0.00028NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00024<0.00034 <0.00030 <0.00043 <0.00039NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00033<0.00022 <0.000190.0046 J<0.00025NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00021<0.00048 <0.00043 <0.00061 <0.00055NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00047<0.00085 <0.00075 <0.0011 <0.00098NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00084<0.00051 <0.00045 <0.00065 <0.00059NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00050<0.00048 <0.00043 <0.00061 <0.00055NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00047<0.00037 <0.00032 <0.00046 <0.00042NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00036<0.00027 <0.00024 <0.00035 <0.00031NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00027<0.00052 <0.000460.024<0.00060NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00051<0.00023 <0.000200.0098<0.00027NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.00023<0.0180.034 J 0.041 J270<0.01614<0.015 <0.019 <0.019 <0.014 <0.018 <0.016 <0.018 <0.018 <0.019 <0.019<0.013 <0.013 <0.014 <0.0140.28<0.01416<0.014 <0.0140.046 J<0.0140.15<0.014 <0.013 <0.014 <0.014<0.071 <0.071 <0.071 <0.073NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.076<0.061 <0.060 <0.061 <0.062NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.065<0.058 <0.058 <0.058 <0.059NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.062<0.048 <0.048 <0.048 <0.049NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.052<0.052 <0.051 <0.052 <0.053NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.055<0.049 <0.048 <0.049 <0.050NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.052<0.056 <0.056 <0.056 <0.057NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.060<0.057 <0.0560.14 J<0.058NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.061<0.064 <0.063<0.064<0.065NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.068<0.053 <0.0520.94<0.054NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.056<0.058 <0.057<0.058<0.059NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.062<0.059 <0.058<0.059<0.060NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.0630.91 J 2.6 2.7 1.3 JNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA2.2110 78 28 J 140NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA44<0.0250.032 J 0.035 J 0.041 JNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.02762 82 20 150NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA1700.34 J2.31 0.82 1.88NANANANANANANANANANANA1.4861.66 79.69 19.18 148.12NANANANANANANANANANANA168.524.7 14 25 1.6NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA7.00.075 0.052 0.051 0.021 JNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.100.47 J 1.0 J 0.86 J 0.98 JNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA1.60.087 J<0.0250.19 J<0.026 NANANANANANANANANANANA<0.0272/6/202198-10Former R&D LabFormer Henkel ChemicalHHSB-15A HHSB-15C HHSB-15EHHSB-15DHHSB-15B / DUP-2S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables4/23/2019Table 1 (Page 2 of 5)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1Summary of Soil Analytical Results Kaiser Fluids Tech IICharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. AMK-011Portion of SiteArea of ConcernSample IDHHSB-29 HHSB-30 HHSB-31 HHSB-32Date10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018Depth* (ft bgs)0-20-20-20-2VOCs (8260) mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethane3.817NANANANA1,1-Dichloroethylene48210NANANANA1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene13190NANANANA1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1255NANANANA1,2-Dichlorobenzene3802,000NANANANA1,3-DichlorobenzeneNSNSNANANANA1,4-Dichlorobenzene2.812NANANANA1,4-Dioxane5.425NANANANAAcetone12,000140,000NANANANABenzene1.25.4NANANANABromomethane1.46.4NANANANACarbon Disulfide160740NANANANAChlorobenzene58280NANANANAcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene31470NANANANAtrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene3104,700NANANANAEthylbenzene6.127NANANANAMethylcyclohexane1,4005,800NANANANAMethyl Acetate16,000230,000NANANANAMethyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)5,50040,000NANANANAMethyl Isobutyl Ketone7,00030,000NANANANATrichloroethylene0.874.0NANANANAVinyl Chloride0.0611.7NANANANAm,p-Xylenes120500NANANANAo-Xylene140590NANANANAPCBs (8082)Aroclor 12420.230.95NANANANAAroclor 12480.230.96NANANANASVOCs (8270) mg/kg2-Methylnaphthalene48600NANANANAAcenaphthene7209,000NANANANABenzo(a)anthracene1.121NANANANABenzo(a)pyrene0.112.1NANANANABenzo(b)fluoranthene1.121NANANANABenzo(g,h,i)peryleneNSNSNANANANAChrysene1102,100NANANANAFluoranthene4806,000NANANANAFluorene4806,000NANANANAPentachlorophenol1.04.0NANANANAPenenathreneNSNSNANANANAPyrene364,500NANANANAMetals (6020/7471/7199) mg/kgArsenic0.68 3.03.1 B 3.3 B 3.7 B 3.3 BBarium3,100 47,00065 E 79 E 62 58Cadmium14 2000.38 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 0.88 J, BL, BChromium (Total)NS NS46 35 50 37Hexavalent Chromium0.31 6.50.18 J 0.38 J 0.44 J 0.25 JTrivalent Chromium**23,000350,00045.8234.6249.5636.75Lead400800305.8148.7Mercury2.39.70.0370.014 J0.0280.022 JSelenium781,2003.9 Ac, B 6.7 Ac, B 5.3 Ac, B 2.9 Ac, BSilver781,2000.078 J0.20 J0.18 J0.15 JNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Health Based Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (February 2018)* = VOCs were collected as grab samples from within the specified interval**Trivalent Chromium = Chromium (Total) - Hexavalent Chromium*** Two values were reported by the laboratory for detections of hexavalent chromium. Only the higher of the two values is shown on this table. BOLD indicates concentration exceeds the Residential PSRGs and background for metalsUnderline indicates concentration exceeds the Industrial/Commercial PSRGs and background for metalsSoil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parenthesesVOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compoundsNA = not analyzed; NS = not specified; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; -- = not applicableAa = Final CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.Ab = Initial CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.Ac = Initial LLICV recovery outside the control limits. Result may have a low bias.B = Analyte is found in the associated blank. E = Estimated concentration above the calibration range.J = Detected but below the reporting limits. The concentration reported is an estimate. Screening CriteriaResidential PSRGs (1)(mg/kg)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)(mg/kg)Site Specific BackgroundWest of Warehouse #2Former Isopropylene USTHHSB-17 HHSB-18 HHSB-19 HHSB-20 HHSB-21HHSB-23 HHSB-2410/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/201810/3/2018 10/3/20186-82-48-104-61-30-26-8<0.00016 <0.00016 <0.00016 <0.00015 <0.00017 <0.00014 <0.00018 <0.00017 <0.00012<0.00025 <0.00025 <0.00025 <0.00024 <0.00027 <0.00023 <0.00029 <0.00026 <0.00020<0.00033 <0.00032 <0.00032 <0.00031 <0.00035 <0.00029 <0.00037 <0.00034 <0.00026<0.00043 <0.00043 <0.00042 <0.00041 <0.00046 <0.00038 <0.00048 <0.00044 <0.00033<0.00027 <0.00027 <0.00026 <0.00026 <0.00029 <0.00024 <0.00031 <0.000280.0030 J<0.00038 <0.00038 <0.00037 <0.00037 <0.00041 <0.00034 <0.00043 <0.00039 <0.00030<0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00022 <0.00022 <0.00024 <0.00020 <0.00026 <0.000230.0085 J<0.012 <0.012 <0.011 <0.011 <0.013 <0.010 <0.013 <0.012 <0.00910.029 0.041<0.00140.038<0.0015 <0.00120.086 0.039 0.026<0.00034 <0.00033 <0.00033 <0.00032 <0.00036 <0.00030 <0.00038 <0.000350.0020 J<0.00071 <0.00071 <0.00070 <0.00068 <0.00077 <0.00063 <0.00080 <0.00073 <0.00055<0.00028 <0.00028 <0.00028 <0.00027 <0.00030 <0.00025 <0.000320.0071 J 0.0082 J<0.00031 <0.00030 <0.00030 <0.00029 <0.00033 <0.00027 <0.000340.026 0.12<0.00025 <0.00024 <0.00024 <0.00024 <0.00026 <0.00022 <0.00028 <0.00025 <0.00019<0.00034 <0.00034 <0.00034 <0.00033 <0.00037 <0.00031 <0.00039 <0.00036 <0.00027<0.00022 <0.00022 <0.00022 <0.00021 <0.00024 <0.00020 <0.00025 <0.00023 <0.00017<0.00049 <0.00049 <0.00048 <0.00047 <0.00053 <0.00044 <0.00055 <0.00051 <0.00038<0.00087 <0.00086 <0.00085 <0.00083 <0.00094 <0.00077 <0.00098 <0.00090 <0.000680.0046 J<0.00052 <0.00051 <0.00050 <0.00056 <0.000460.023 J<0.00054 <0.00041<0.00049 <0.00049 <0.00048 <0.00047 <0.00053 <0.00044 <0.00055 <0.00051 <0.00038<0.00037 <0.00037 <0.00037 <0.00036 <0.00040 <0.00033 <0.00042 <0.00039 <0.00029<0.00028 <0.00028 <0.00027 <0.00027 <0.00030 <0.00025 <0.00031 <0.00029 <0.00022<0.00053 <0.00053 <0.00052 <0.00051 <0.00057 <0.00047 <0.00060 <0.00055 <0.00041<0.00024 <0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00025 <0.00021 <0.00027 <0.00024 <0.000180.044 J 0.032 J<0.019 <0.019 <0.019 <0.017 <0.019 <0.018 <0.016<0.015 <0.013 <0.014 <0.014 <0.014 <0.012 <0.014 <0.013 <0.012<0.078 <0.068 <0.073 <0.075 <0.074 <0.066 <0.076 <0.070 <0.064<0.066 <0.058 <0.063 <0.064 <0.0630.69<0.064 <0.060 <0.054<0.064 <0.056 <0.060 <0.061 <0.0601.2<0.062 <0.057 <0.052<0.053 <0.046 <0.050 <0.050 <0.0500.47<0.051 <0.048 <0.043<0.056 <0.049 <0.053 <0.054 <0.0530.38 J<0.055 <0.051 <0.046<0.053 <0.047 <0.050 <0.051 <0.0510.18 J<0.052 <0.048 <0.044<0.061 <0.053 <0.058 <0.059 <0.0581.5<0.060 <0.055 <0.050<0.062 <0.054 <0.059 <0.060 <0.0590.49<0.060 <0.056 <0.051<0.070 <0.061 <0.066 <0.067 <0.0660.79<0.068 <0.063 <0.058<0.058 <0.050 <0.054 <0.055 <0.054 <0.048 <0.056 <0.052 <0.047<0.063 <0.055 <0.060 <0.061 <0.0602.4<0.062 <0.057 <0.052<0.064 <0.056 <0.061 <0.062 <0.0611.7<0.063 <0.058 <0.0533.04.41.7 J2.51.4 J 1.2 J 1.2 J5.61.874 32 110 80 99 48 57 68 830.045 J<0.0240.048 J 0.037 J<0.026 <0.024 <0.027 <0.0250.035 J55 80 110 49 12 120 120 62 311.35 0.65 0.84 1.690.320.45 0.66<0.55 <0.5453.65 79.35 109.16 47.31 11.68 119.55 119.34 62 318.9 10 4.0 13 8.4 7.0 14.0 11 8.90.0015 J 0.031 0.0084 J 0.052 0.019 J 0.021 J 0.021 J 0.075 0.0361.8 1.2 J 1.8 1.8<0.29 Ab, B <0.26 Ab, B0.42 J, Aa 0.94 J, Ab, B 1.2 J, Ab, B<0.0280.033 J<0.026 <0.027 <0.026 <0.024 <0.0270.030 J<0.0232-4Former Storage BuildingWest-Central Portion of SiteFormer Henkel Chemical10/3/2018HHSB-22 / DUP-S2Former Rail SpurS:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables4/23/2019Table 1 (Page 3 of 5)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1Summary of Soil Analytical Results Kaiser Fluids Tech IICharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. AMK-011Portion of SiteArea of ConcernSample IDHHSB-29 HHSB-30 HHSB-31 HHSB-32Date10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018Depth* (ft bgs)0-20-20-20-2VOCs (8260) mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethane3.817NANANANA1,1-Dichloroethylene48210NANANANA1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene13190NANANANA1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1255NANANANA1,2-Dichlorobenzene3802,000NANANANA1,3-DichlorobenzeneNSNSNANANANA1,4-Dichlorobenzene2.812NANANANA1,4-Dioxane5.425NANANANAAcetone12,000140,000NANANANABenzene1.25.4NANANANABromomethane1.46.4NANANANACarbon Disulfide160740NANANANAChlorobenzene58280NANANANAcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene31470NANANANAtrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene3104,700NANANANAEthylbenzene6.127NANANANAMethylcyclohexane1,4005,800NANANANAMethyl Acetate16,000230,000NANANANAMethyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)5,50040,000NANANANAMethyl Isobutyl Ketone7,00030,000NANANANATrichloroethylene0.874.0NANANANAVinyl Chloride0.0611.7NANANANAm,p-Xylenes120500NANANANAo-Xylene140590NANANANAPCBs (8082)Aroclor 12420.230.95NANANANAAroclor 12480.230.96NANANANASVOCs (8270) mg/kg2-Methylnaphthalene48600NANANANAAcenaphthene7209,000NANANANABenzo(a)anthracene1.121NANANANABenzo(a)pyrene0.112.1NANANANABenzo(b)fluoranthene1.121NANANANABenzo(g,h,i)peryleneNSNSNANANANAChrysene1102,100NANANANAFluoranthene4806,000NANANANAFluorene4806,000NANANANAPentachlorophenol1.04.0NANANANAPenenathreneNSNSNANANANAPyrene364,500NANANANAMetals (6020/7471/7199) mg/kgArsenic0.68 3.03.1 B 3.3 B 3.7 B 3.3 BBarium3,100 47,00065 E 79 E 62 58Cadmium14 2000.38 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 0.88 J, BL, BChromium (Total)NS NS46 35 50 37Hexavalent Chromium0.31 6.50.18 J 0.38 J 0.44 J 0.25 JTrivalent Chromium**23,000350,00045.8234.6249.5636.75Lead400800305.8148.7Mercury2.39.70.0370.014 J0.0280.022 JSelenium781,2003.9 Ac, B 6.7 Ac, B 5.3 Ac, B 2.9 Ac, BSilver781,2000.078 J0.20 J0.18 J0.15 JNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Health Based Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (February 2018)* = VOCs were collected as grab samples from within the specified interval**Trivalent Chromium = Chromium (Total) - Hexavalent Chromium*** Two values were reported by the laboratory for detections of hexavalent chromium. Only the higher of the two values is shown on this table. BOLD indicates concentration exceeds the Residential PSRGs and background for metalsUnderline indicates concentration exceeds the Industrial/Commercial PSRGs and background for metalsSoil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parenthesesVOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compoundsNA = not analyzed; NS = not specified; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; -- = not applicableAa = Final CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.Ab = Initial CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.Ac = Initial LLICV recovery outside the control limits. Result may have a low bias.B = Analyte is found in the associated blank. E = Estimated concentration above the calibration range.J = Detected but below the reporting limits. The concentration reported is an estimate. Screening CriteriaResidential PSRGs (1)(mg/kg)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)(mg/kg)Site Specific BackgroundFormer Maintenance ShopHHSB-25 HHSB-26 HHSB-27HHSB-2810/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/2018 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 10/3/20182-42-45-70-20-28-100-48-100-28-102-4<0.00013 <0.00014 <0.00014NANANANANA<0.088NANANA<0.00015<0.00020 <0.00023 <0.00022NANANANANA<0.095NANANA<0.00023<0.00026 <0.00029 <0.00028NANANANANA0.43 JNANANA<0.00030<0.00034 <0.00038 <0.00037NANANANANA2.5NANANA<0.00039<0.00021 <0.00024 <0.00023NANANANANA78NANANA0.0047 J<0.00030 <0.00034 <0.00033NANANANANA9.2NANANA<0.00035<0.000180.02<0.00019NANANANANA6.9NANANA0.0047 J<0.00910.058 J 0.057 JNANANANANA<1.0NANANA<0.011<0.00110.012 J<0.0012NANANANANA<0.25NANANA<0.0013<0.000260.042<0.00029NANANANANA0.53NANANA0.0083<0.00056 <0.00063 <0.00061NANANANANA0.17 JNANANA<0.00065<0.000220.0028 J<0.00024NANANANANA<0.073NANANA<0.00026<0.000246.4<0.00026NANANANANA5.9NANANA0.19<0.00019 <0.00022 <0.00021NANANANANA<0.070NANANA<0.00023<0.00027 <0.00031 <0.00030NANANANANA<0.076NANANA<0.00032<0.00017 <0.00020 <0.00019NANANANANA<0.076NANANA<0.00020<0.00038 <0.00044 <0.00042NANANANANA<0.079NANANA<0.00045<0.00068 <0.00077 <0.00075NANANANANA<0.097NANANA<0.00080<0.00041 <0.00046 <0.00045NANANANANA<0.054NANANA<0.00048<0.00038 <0.00044 <0.00042NANANANANA<0.058NANANA<0.00045<0.00029 <0.00033 <0.00032NANANANANA<0.072NANANA<0.00034<0.00022 <0.00025 <0.00024NANANANANA<0.092NANANA<0.00026<0.00042 <0.00047 <0.00046NANANANANA0.17 JNANANA<0.00049<0.00018 <0.00021 <0.00020NANANANANA<0.073NANANA<0.00022<0.015 <0.017 <0.016 <0.28 <0.015 <0.015 <0.016 <0.017 <0.018 <0.017 <0.017 <0.016 <0.017<0.012 <0.01325012<0.011 <0.011 <0.012 <0.0120.11<0.0130.031 J<0.0120.045 J<0.061 <0.067 <0.065NANANANANANANANANA<0.067<0.052 <0.057 <0.055NANANANANANANANANA<0.057<0.050 <0.055 <0.053NANANANANANANANANA<0.055<0.041 <0.045 <0.044NANANANANANANANANA<0.046<0.044 <0.049 <0.047NANANANANANANANANA<0.049<0.042 <0.046 <0.044NANANANANANANANANA<0.046<0.048 <0.053 <0.051NANANANANANANANANA<0.053<0.049 <0.054 <0.052NANANANANANANANANA<0.054<0.055 <0.060 <0.058NANANANANANANANANA<0.061<0.045 <0.050 <0.048NANANANANANANANANA<0.050<0.050 <0.055 <0.053NANANANANANANANANA<0.055<0.051 <0.056 <0.054NANANANANANANANANA<0.0561.8 3.2 1.3 JNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA2.662 70 57NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA630.043 J 0.060 J 0.023 JNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.11 J59 61 44NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA771.10<0.491.02NANANANANANANANANA0.25 J57.9 61 42.98NANANANANANANANANA76.756.6 7.5 8.4NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA8.70.075 0.062 0.024NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA0.0361.3 J, Ab, B 2.2 J, Ab, B 1.2 J, Ab, BNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA1.6 J, Ab, B<0.022 <0.024 <0.023 NANANANANANANANANA0.029 J2/7/20198-10HHSB-27A / DUP-3Former AST Area/Trench DrainFormer Henkel ChemicalHHSB-27B HHSB-27C HHSB-27DS:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables4/23/2019Table 1 (Page 4 of 5)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1Summary of Soil Analytical Results Kaiser Fluids Tech IICharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. AMK-011Portion of SiteArea of ConcernSample IDHHSB-29 HHSB-30 HHSB-31 HHSB-32Date10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018Depth* (ft bgs)0-20-20-20-2VOCs (8260) mg/kg1,1-Dichloroethane3.817NANANANA1,1-Dichloroethylene48210NANANANA1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene13190NANANANA1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1255NANANANA1,2-Dichlorobenzene3802,000NANANANA1,3-DichlorobenzeneNSNSNANANANA1,4-Dichlorobenzene2.812NANANANA1,4-Dioxane5.425NANANANAAcetone12,000140,000NANANANABenzene1.25.4NANANANABromomethane1.46.4NANANANACarbon Disulfide160740NANANANAChlorobenzene58280NANANANAcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene31470NANANANAtrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene3104,700NANANANAEthylbenzene6.127NANANANAMethylcyclohexane1,4005,800NANANANAMethyl Acetate16,000230,000NANANANAMethyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)5,50040,000NANANANAMethyl Isobutyl Ketone7,00030,000NANANANATrichloroethylene0.874.0NANANANAVinyl Chloride0.0611.7NANANANAm,p-Xylenes120500NANANANAo-Xylene140590NANANANAPCBs (8082)Aroclor 12420.230.95NANANANAAroclor 12480.230.96NANANANASVOCs (8270) mg/kg2-Methylnaphthalene48600NANANANAAcenaphthene7209,000NANANANABenzo(a)anthracene1.121NANANANABenzo(a)pyrene0.112.1NANANANABenzo(b)fluoranthene1.121NANANANABenzo(g,h,i)peryleneNSNSNANANANAChrysene1102,100NANANANAFluoranthene4806,000NANANANAFluorene4806,000NANANANAPentachlorophenol1.04.0NANANANAPenenathreneNSNSNANANANAPyrene364,500NANANANAMetals (6020/7471/7199) mg/kgArsenic0.68 3.03.1 B 3.3 B 3.7 B 3.3 BBarium3,100 47,00065 E 79 E 62 58Cadmium14 2000.38 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 1.1 J, BL, B 0.88 J, BL, BChromium (Total)NS NS46 35 50 37Hexavalent Chromium0.31 6.50.18 J 0.38 J 0.44 J 0.25 JTrivalent Chromium**23,000350,00045.8234.6249.5636.75Lead400800305.8148.7Mercury2.39.70.0370.014 J0.0280.022 JSelenium781,2003.9 Ac, B 6.7 Ac, B 5.3 Ac, B 2.9 Ac, BSilver781,2000.078 J0.20 J0.18 J0.15 JNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Health Based Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (February 2018)* = VOCs were collected as grab samples from within the specified interval**Trivalent Chromium = Chromium (Total) - Hexavalent Chromium*** Two values were reported by the laboratory for detections of hexavalent chromium. Only the higher of the two values is shown on this table. BOLD indicates concentration exceeds the Residential PSRGs and background for metalsUnderline indicates concentration exceeds the Industrial/Commercial PSRGs and background for metalsSoil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parenthesesVOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compoundsNA = not analyzed; NS = not specified; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; -- = not applicableAa = Final CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.Ab = Initial CCV recovery outside the control limits. The concentration reported may have a high bias.Ac = Initial LLICV recovery outside the control limits. Result may have a low bias.B = Analyte is found in the associated blank. E = Estimated concentration above the calibration range.J = Detected but below the reporting limits. The concentration reported is an estimate. Screening CriteriaResidential PSRGs (1)(mg/kg)Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (1)(mg/kg)Site Specific BackgroundHHSB-34 HHSB-35 HHSB-36HHSB-38 HHSB-39 W2SB-1 W2SB-2 W2SB-3 W2SB-4 W2SB-5 W2SB-6 W2SB-7 W2SB-8 W2SB-9 W2SB-102/6/2019 2/6/2019 2/6/20192/6/2019 2/13/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/20190-60-60-60-60.5-22-40-24-68-100-20-22-42-44-60-2<0.00016 <0.00016 <0.00016 <0.00015 <0.00018 <0.00017NA<0.00016 <0.00016 <0.00015 <0.00014 <0.00015 <0.00017 <0.00016 <0.00016 <0.00015 <0.00016<0.00025 <0.00026 <0.00026 <0.00023 <0.00028 <0.00028NA<0.00026 <0.00026 <0.00023 <0.00022 <0.00024 <0.00026 <0.00025 <0.00025 <0.00024 <0.00026<0.00032 <0.00033 <0.00033 <0.00030 <0.00037 <0.00035NA<0.00033 <0.00033 <0.00030 <0.00029 <0.00031 <0.00034 <0.00032 <0.00032 <0.00031 <0.00034<0.00042 <0.00044 <0.00043 <0.00039 <0.00048 <0.00046NA<0.00044 <0.00044 <0.00039 <0.00037 <0.00041 <0.00044 <0.00042 <0.00042 <0.00041 <0.00044<0.00026 <0.00028 <0.00027 <0.000250.0036 A, J<0.00029NA<0.00028 <0.00028 <0.00025 <0.00024 <0.00026 <0.00028 <0.00026 <0.00026 <0.00026 <0.00028<0.00037 <0.00039 <0.00038 <0.00035 <0.00043 <0.00041NA<0.00039 <0.00039 <0.00035 <0.00033 <0.00036 <0.00040 <0.00037 <0.00037 <0.00036 <0.00039<0.00022 <0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00021 <0.00025 <0.00025NA<0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00021 <0.00020 <0.00022 <0.00024 <0.00022 <0.00022 <0.00022 <0.00023<0.011 <0.012 <0.012 <0.011 <0.013 <0.013NA<0.012 <0.012 <0.011 <0.010 <0.011 <0.012 <0.011 <0.011 <0.011 <0.0120.025 0.018 J 0.026 0.038 0.033<0.0015NA0.051 0.037 0.11 0.053 0.140.11 0.092 0.033 0.068 0.19<0.00032 <0.00034 <0.00034 <0.00030 <0.00037 <0.00036NA<0.00034 <0.00034 <0.00031 <0.00029 <0.00032 <0.00035 <0.00033 <0.00033 <0.00032 <0.00035<0.00069 <0.00073 <0.00072 <0.00064 <0.00079 <0.00077NA<0.00072 <0.000730.0025 J<0.00062 <0.00068 <0.00074 <0.00069 <0.00069 <0.00068 <0.00073<0.00027 <0.00029 <0.00028 <0.00026 <0.00032 <0.00031NA<0.00029 <0.00029 <0.00026 <0.00025 <0.00027 <0.00029 <0.00027 <0.00027 <0.00027 <0.00029<0.00030 <0.00031 <0.00031 <0.00028 <0.00034 <0.00033NA<0.00031 <0.00031 <0.00028 <0.00027 <0.00029 <0.00032 <0.00030 <0.00030 <0.00029 <0.00031<0.00024 <0.00025 <0.00025 <0.00022 <0.00027 <0.00027NA<0.00025 <0.00025 <0.00023 <0.00021 <0.00023 <0.00025 <0.00024 <0.00024 <0.00023 <0.00025<0.00033 <0.00035 <0.00035 <0.00031 <0.00039 <0.00037NA<0.00035 <0.00035 <0.00032 <0.00030 <0.00033 <0.00036 <0.00034 <0.00034 <0.00033 <0.00035<0.00021 <0.00023 <0.00022 <0.00020 <0.00025 <0.00024NA<0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00020 <0.00019 <0.00021 <0.00023 <0.00022 <0.00022 <0.00021 <0.00023<0.00048 <0.00050 <0.00049 <0.00044 <0.00055 <0.00053NA<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00045 <0.00043 <0.00047 <0.00051 <0.00048 <0.00048 <0.00047 <0.000510.0030 J<0.00089 <0.00088 <0.00079 <0.00097 <0.00094NA<0.00089 <0.00089 <0.00080 <0.00076 <0.00083 <0.00090 <0.00085 <0.00085 <0.00083 <0.00090<0.00050 <0.00053 <0.00052 <0.00047 <0.00058 <0.00056NA<0.00053 <0.000530.013 J<0.00045 <0.00049 <0.00054 <0.00051 <0.00051 <0.00050 <0.00054<0.00048 <0.00050 <0.00049 <0.00044 <0.00055 <0.00053NA<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00045 <0.00043 <0.00047 <0.00051 <0.00048 <0.00048 <0.000470.015<0.00036 <0.00038 <0.00038 <0.00034 <0.00042 <0.00040NA<0.00038 <0.00038 <0.00034 <0.00033 <0.00035 <0.00039 <0.00036 <0.00036 <0.00036 <0.00038<0.00027 <0.00029 <0.00028 <0.00025 <0.00031 <0.00030NA<0.00028 <0.00028 <0.00026 <0.00024 <0.00027 <0.00029 <0.00027 <0.00027 <0.00027 <0.00029<0.00051 <0.00054 <0.00054 <0.00048 <0.00059 <0.00057NA<0.00054 <0.00054 <0.00049 <0.00046 <0.00050 <0.00055 <0.00052 <0.00052 <0.00051 <0.00055<0.00023 <0.00024 <0.00024 <0.00021 <0.00026 <0.00026NA<0.00024 <0.00024 <0.00022 <0.00021 <0.00022 <0.00025 <0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00023 <0.00024<0.018 <0.018 <0.018 <0.017 <0.017 <0.019 NA <0.018 <0.0180.017 0.016 0.018 0.017<0.0170.018 0.017 0.018<0.014 <0.014 <0.013 <0.013 <0.013 <0.014 NA<0.013 <0.0130.013 0.014 0.013 0.016<0.0130.014 0.013 0.013<0.072 <0.072 <0.071 <0.066 <0.068 <0.075NA0.26 J<0.072 <0.0670.11 J<0.071 <0.069 <0.069 <0.072 <0.068 <0.071<0.061 <0.062 <0.061 <0.056 <0.058 <0.064NA<0.059 <0.061 <0.057 <0.056 <0.060 <0.059 <0.059 <0.061 <0.057 <0.060<0.059 <0.059 <0.058 <0.054 <0.056 <0.062NA<0.057 <0.059 <0.055 <0.054 <0.058 <0.056 <0.056 <0.059 <0.055 <0.058<0.049 <0.049 <0.048 <0.045 <0.046 <0.051NA<0.047 <0.048 <0.046 <0.044 <0.048 <0.047 <0.047 <0.049 <0.046 <0.048<0.052 <0.053 <0.052 <0.048 <0.050 <0.055NA<0.051 <0.052 <0.049 <0.047 <0.051 <0.050 <0.050 <0.052 <0.049 <0.052<0.050 <0.050 <0.049 <0.045 <0.047 <0.052NA<0.048 <0.049 <0.046 <0.045 <0.049 <0.047 <0.047 <0.049 <0.046 <0.049<0.057 <0.057 <0.056 <0.052 <0.054 <0.059NA<0.055 <0.056 <0.053 <0.052 <0.056 <0.054 <0.054 <0.057 <0.053 <0.056<0.058 <0.058 <0.057 <0.053 <0.055 <0.060NA<0.056 <0.057 <0.054 <0.052 <0.057 <0.055 <0.055 <0.057 <0.054 <0.057<0.065 <0.065 <0.064 <0.059 <0.061 <0.068NA<0.063 <0.064 <0.061 <0.059 <0.064 <0.062 <0.062 <0.064 <0.061 <0.064<0.053 <0.053 <0.053 <0.049 <0.050 <0.056NA<0.052 <0.053 <0.050 <0.048 <0.052 <0.051 <0.051 <0.053 <0.050 <0.053<0.059 <0.059 <0.058 <0.054 <0.056 <0.061NA<0.057 <0.058 <0.055 <0.053 <0.058 <0.056 <0.056 <0.058 <0.055 <0.058<0.060 <0.060 <0.059 <0.055 <0.057 <0.062NA<0.058 <0.059 <0.056 <0.054 <0.059 <0.057 <0.057 <0.059 <0.056 <0.0594.32.52.74.44.12.3NA2.7 2.6 2.55.12.72.72.42.72.92.484721901205736NA645326 J10073806513051640.13 J<0.0260.047 J 0.024 J<0.025 <0.027 NA <0.025 <0.026 <0.024 <0.024 <0.0260.029 J<0.025 <0.026 <0.024 <0.026504134376133NA524323334054373939470.22 J0.53 J<0.06NANANANA0.12 J 0.33 J 0.28 JNA0.44 J0.530.39 J0.680.41 JNA49.78 40.4734NANANANA51.88 42.67 22.72NA39.56 53.47 36.61 38.32 38.59NA297.3319.96.18.8NA8.58.65.4159.18.97.1107.77.80.031 0.036 0.084 0.033 0.084 0.076 0.047 0.029 0.027 0.042 0.027 0.041 0.029 0.023 J 0.013 J 0.035 0.0491.3 J 1.2 J 0.79 J 3.71.1 J1.6NA1.2 J 1.0 J 1.2 J1.61.0 J 1.1 J 1.2 J 1.1 J 1.0 J 1.1 J0.041 J<0.0260.057 J 0.049 J<0.025 <0.027 NA<0.025 <0.026 <0.0240.026 J<0.026 <0.025 <0.0250.026 J 0.027 J<0.0260-6Former Henkel ChemicalFuture Building Addition2/6/2019Warehouse #2HHSB-37 / DUP-1S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables4/23/2019Table 1 (Page 5 of 5)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2Summary of Well Construction and Groundwater Elevation Data Kaiser Fluids Tech IICharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. AMK-011Well IDScreened ZoneTOC Elevation (ft)Total Depth (ft below TOC)Screen Length (ft)Static Depth to Groundwater (ft below TOC)Groundwater Elevation (ft below TOC)HHTMW-1 Shallow 95.81 23 10 18.42 77.39HHTMW-2 Shallow 98.61 18 10 16.90 81.71HHTMW-3 Shallow 100.00 20 10 16.58 83.42HHTMW-4 Shallow 96.49 20 10 10.99 85.50HHTMW-5 Shallow 102.55 20 10 17.65 84.90HHTMW-6 Shallow 105.94 15 10 10.16 95.78MW-2 -- 99.48 -- -- 14.18 85.30MW-3 -- 100.30 -- -- 14.37 85.93MW-4 -- 101.08 -- -- 13.33 87.75Notes:TMW = temporary monitoring well; TOC = top of casing; ft = feetDepth to groundwater measurements collected on October 9, 2018Elevations are approximate and are referenced to an arbitrary datum of 100 ft at HHTMW-3-- = existing monitoring wells installed by others, well construction details are unknownS:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables Table 2 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results Kaiser Fluids Tech IICharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. AMK-011Portion of SiteArea of ConcernDowngradient Portion of SiteFormer Settling Tank Excavation AreaFormer TCE Degreaser Loading DockFormer R&D Lab / Downgradient Portion of SiteFormer AST Area Western Portion of SiteSample IDHHTMW-1 HHTMW-2 HHTMW-3 HHTMW-4 HHTMW-5 HHTMW-6 MW-2 MW-3Trip BlankDate10/2/2018 10/4/2018 10/4/2018 10/4/2018 10/4/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/2/201810/2/2018VOCs (8260) µg/LAcetone6,0004,500,000 19,000,000<0.31158.5 J167.6 J<0.31<0.31<0.31NANA<0.31<0.31<0.31Chlorobenzene5082340<0.062<0.062<0.062<0.062<0.0620.56 J<0.062<0.062NANA<0.062<0.062<0.0621,1-Dichloroethane676330<0.0831.4<0.0832.0<0.083<0.083<0.083<0.083NANA<0.083<0.083<0.0831,1-Dichloroethylene7391600.53 J<0.083<0.0831.8<0.083<0.083<0.083<0.083NANA<0.083<0.083<0.083cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene70NSNS<0.056<0.056<0.05626<0.056<0.056<0.056<0.056NANA<0.056<0.056<0.056trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene100NS NS <0.094 <0.094 <0.0940.50 J<0.094 <0.094 <0.094 <0.094 NA NA <0.094 <0.094 <0.0941,4-Dioxane 3 29,000 130,000<14 <14 <14300<14 <14 <1464 JNA NA <14 <14 <14Ethylbenzene600351500.73 J<0.061<0.061<0.061<0.061<0.061<0.061<0.061NANA<0.061<0.061<0.061Toluene6003,80016,000<0.0440.32 J<0.0440.63 J0.28 J<0.044<0.044<0.044NANA<0.044<0.044<0.0441,1,1-Trichloroethane2001,5006,2000.50 J1.4<0.061<0.061<0.061<0.061<0.061<0.061NANA<0.061<0.061<0.0611,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane200482003.1 J1.1 J<0.079<0.079<0.079<0.079<0.079<0.079NANA<0.079<0.079<0.079Trichloroethylene314.4<0.078<0.0780.65 J1.4 J<0.078<0.078<0.078<0.078NANA<0.078<0.078<0.078Vinyl Chloride0.031.525<0.097<0.097<0.0970.61 J<0.097<0.097<0.097<0.097NANA<0.097<0.097<0.097m+p Xylene500713003.0<0.120.55 J<0.12<0.12<0.12<0.12<0.12NANA<0.12<0.12<0.12o-Xylene500984101.1<0.044<0.044<0.044<0.044<0.044<0.044<0.044NANA<0.044<0.044<0.044SVOCs (8270) µg/LPentachlorophenol0.3NSNS<1.3<1.3<1.2<1.212<1.2<1.2<1.2NANA<1.2<1.2Metals (6020/7471) µg/LArsenic10NSNS0.31 J0.17 J0.64 J0.53 J0.62 J1.60.083 J0.29 JNANA0.14 J0.056 JBarium700NSNS8.81.9 J9313066812950NANA1414Cadmium2NSNS<0.078<0.078<0.078<0.078<0.0780.12 J<0.078<0.078NANA<0.078<0.078Chromium (Total)10NS NS2.1200.22 J 0.75 J190.34 J 4.6 0.90 JNA NA3.0 3.0Lead 15NS NS0.38 J 0.18 J 0.12 J 0.21 J 0.31 J 3.6<0.0930.18 JNA NA <0.093 <0.093Mercury10.180.75<0.036<0.036<0.036<0.036<0.0360.34<0.03661<0.036<0.036<0.036<0.036Selenium20NSNS0.66 J<0.630.67 J1.2 J1.0 J1.2 J<0.63<0.63NANA0.82 J<0.63Silver 20NS NS <0.063 <0.0630.063 J<0.063 <0.063 <0.063 <0.063 <0.063 NA NA <0.063 <0.063Turbidity (NTU)------8.575.416.4311.608.436.627.467.51Notes:1) North Carolina 15A NCAC 02L Groundwater Standards (2L Standards) (April 2013)2) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Residential Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSLs) (February 2018)3) DEQ - Division of Waste Management (DWM) Non-Residential GWSLs (February 2018)Only compounds detected in at least one sample shown aboveConcentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L)Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parenthesesBold values exceed a 2L Standard or DEQ IMACUnderlined values exceed a Residential GWSLBold, italicized, and underlined values exceed 2L and Industrial/Commercial GWSLJ = estimated value between the laboratory detection limit and the laboratory reporting limit-- = Not Applicable; NS = Not Specified; NA = Not Analyzed; NTU = Nephelometric Turbidity Unit; VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds; SVOCs = Semi-Volatile Organic CompoundsMW-4 / Dup-W10/3/20182/13/20198.85Downgradient Portion of Site5.04North Carolina 2L Groundwater Standards (1)Residential Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels (2)Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels (3)Former Kaiser TechnologiesFormer Henkel ChemicalWest of Warehouse #2MW-3 / Dup-GW-1S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables4/23/2019Table 3 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Results Kaiser Fluids Tech IICharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. AMK-011Acetone1,3-ButadieneBenzeneBromomethane2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon DisulfideChloroformChloromethaneCyclohexaneDichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2-Dibromoethanecis-1,2-Dichloroethylenem-DichlorobenzeneEthanolEthylbenzeneEthyl Acetate4-Ethyltoluene1,1,2-Trichloro- 1,2,2-trifluoroethane (Freon 113)HHSG-1 10/4/2018<5.2 <2.0192<1.7 <2.560.1<2.0 <0.6475.4<1.6 <1.3 <2.8 <0.91188<8.338017 102<2.6HHSG-2 10/4/201840.138.518<0.85 <1.27.5<0.98 <0.313.4 J<0.84 <0.67 <1.4 <0.4898 11 96 20 14<1.3HHSG-3 10/4/201852.3<2.0114<1.79.1 J 82.5<2.0 <0.6415<1.636<2.8 <0.91194 19 J 208 15 47 6,280HHSG-4 10/4/201880.3<3.131<2.621 23<2.99.7 J 43<2.5 <2.0152<1.4127<1273417 J<4.4 <4.0HHSG-5 10/4/2018 Former Settling Tank Excavation Area42 6.4 33.9<0.349.1 21<0.392.1 4.8 2.2 J<0.27 <0.55 <0.19134 12 77.7 12 26 2125.2<0.403.5<0.345.6 1.5 J<0.391.4 J 70.2 3.2 J<0.27 <0.5510 22 9.8 33 15 21<0.5222<0.401.5 J<0.344.1<0.29 <0.391.2 J 25 2.9 J<0.27 <0.553.6 11 8.7 13 10 8.4<0.52HHSG-7 10/4/2018Former R&D Lab23<1.06.4<0.853.5 J 7.2<0.98 <0.313.4 J 110<0.67 <1.4 <0.48119 8.9 J 285 15 22<1.3HHSG-8 10/4/2018 West-Central Portion of Site24.5<0.4047 2.6 J 10 20<0.39 <0.133.8 22<0.27 <0.55 <0.1912 13 145 14 66.9<0.52HHSG-9 10/4/2018Former Storage Building17<0.8270.9<0.70 <1.023 3.9 J<0.257.9 25<0.52 <1.1 <0.3713<3.2199 8.6 87<1.1HHSG-10 2/18/2019<33 <1.4110<2.7 <4.645<1.8 <1.453<2.1 <1.6 <3.0 <1.623 58 J 170<2.7100<4.6HHSG-11 2/18/2019<16 <0.7049<1.345 J 84<0.91 <0.70 <1.2 <1.1 <0.80 <1.5 <0.8127 74 64 26<1.5 <2.3220,000 14 120 35 35,000 4,900 41 630 42,000 700 1,400 1.6 NS NS NS 370 490 NS 35,0002,700,000 180 1,600 440 440,000 61,000 530 7,900 530,000 8,800 18,000 20 NS NS NS 4,900 6,100 NS 440,000Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Enviornmental Quality (DEQ) Division of WasteManagement (DWM) Residential Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels(SGSLs) (February 2018)2)DEQ DWM Non-Residential SGSLs (February 2018)Bold indicates concentration exceeds DWM Residential SGSLUnderlined indicates concentrations exceeds DWM Non-Residential SGSLOnly compounds detected in at least one sample shownµg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; NS = Not Specified; NA = Not AnalyzedJ = estimated value between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory reporting limitHHSG-6 / DuplicateNon-Residential Screening Level (2)Residential Screening Level (1)Sample IDSampling DateArea of Concern10/4/2018Analytical Methodµg/m3Portion of SiteFormer Kaiser TechnologiesNorthern Portion of SiteFormer Compressor, Receivers, and Transformers AreaTO-15Former Henkel ChemicalNew Building AdditionS:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables4/23/2019Table 4 (Page 1 of 2)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Results Kaiser Fluids Tech IICharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. AMK-011HHSG-1 10/4/2018HHSG-2 10/4/2018HHSG-3 10/4/2018HHSG-4 10/4/2018HHSG-5 10/4/2018 Former Settling Tank Excavation AreaHHSG-7 10/4/2018Former R&D LabHHSG-8 10/4/2018 West-Central Portion of SiteHHSG-9 10/4/2018 Former Storage BuildingHHSG-10 2/18/2019HHSG-11 2/18/2019Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Enviornmental Quality (DEQ) Division of WasteManagement (DWM) Residential Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels(SGSLs) (February 2018)2)DEQ DWM Non-Residential SGSLs (February 2018)Bold indicates concentration exceeds DWM Residential SGSLUnderlined indicates concentrations exceeds DWM Non-Residential SGSLOnly compounds detected in at least one sample shownµg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; NS = Not Specified; NA = Not AnalyzedJ = estimated value between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory reporting limitHHSG-6 / DuplicateNon-Residential Screening Level (2)Residential Screening Level (1)Sample IDSampling DateArea of Concern10/4/2018Analytical MethodPortion of SiteFormer Kaiser TechnologiesNorthern Portion of SiteFormer Compressor, Receivers, and Transformers AreaTO-15Former Henkel ChemicalNew Building AdditionHeptaneHexaneIsopropyl AlcoholMethylene ChloridePropylene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene2,2,4-TrimethylpentaneTertiary Butyl AlcoholTetrachloroethyleneTolueneTrichloroethyleneTrichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)m,p-Xyleneo-XyleneXylenes (Total)758 500<3.2 <1.0785<3.6 <13191 60 3,300<0.8540 2,660 8.1<3.11,3303451,68046.7 35.2<1.6 <0.52519<1.8 <6.628 10 182<0.42 <2.1261<1.0 <1.6337 102439194 205<3.2 <1.02,280 116<1385.0 27 481<0.8556 1,48024<3.1721194916105 119 14 J<1.51,750<5.5 <20 <4.9 <4.9118<1.39.5 107<3.1 <4.82,890 9253,81059.8 35 9.3<0.20110<0.716.4 62.4 19 174 3.0 1.9 437<0.41 <0.62282 85.6368109 36.3 5.7 3.8 29.5<0.71 <2.689.5 43<0.411.2 J 6.1 39.6 8.6<0.62131 54.7 18541.8 14 2.9 3.8 10<0.71 <2.637 18<0.41 <0.173.4 17 3.4<0.6253.9 2275.637 35<1.6 <0.52 <0.27 <1.8 <6.642 19 275<0.4217 65.9<1.06071,2302961,52057.8 21 54.1<0.208.1<0.71 <2.6156 42 178 2.9423577 1.1 81.5 552 16972185.2 43<1.3 <0.4216<1.5 <5.3204 57.5 294<0.33125 1,020<0.8193.8756225977150 380<3.0 <4.2200<2.0 <5.1390 90NA NA <3.81,000<2.2<3.3720230950741508.1 J<2.1340<1.0 <2.6190 45NANA<1.9400<1.1 <1.6260 793392,800 4,900 NS 4,200 21,000 35,000 14 420 420 NS NS 280 35,000 14 NS 700 700 70035,000 61,000 NS 53,000 260,000 440,000 180 5,300 5,300 NS NS 3,500 440,000 180 NS 8,800 8,800 8,800µg/m3S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables4/23/2019Table 4 (Page 2 of 2)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 5Summary of Sub-Slab Vapor Analytical Results Kaiser Fluids Tech IICharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. AMK-011Acetone1,3-ButadieneBenzeneBromoformBromomethaneBromoethane2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon DisulfideChloroformChloromethaneCyclohexane1,2-Dibromoethane1,1-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2-Dichlorobenzene1,4-DioxaneDichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)cis-1,2-DichloroethyleneEthanolEthylbenzeneEthyl Acetate4-EthyltolueneHeptaneSSVP-1 1/4/2018114<1.8 <2.6 <8.3 <3.1 <3.52.3 J<2.5 <3.9 <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.22.7 J 21 2.0 J<3.278.2<3.5 <2.9 <3.9 <3.31/4/201872.7<1.8 <2.6 <8.3 <3.1 <3.54.1 2.6<3.9 <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.2 <4.86.5 2.2 J<3.235.8<3.5 <2.9 <3.9 <3.32/13/201922<0.28 <0.26 <0.93 <0.53 NA3.8 J<0.43 <0.36 <0.28 <0.49 <0.60 <0.25 <0.32 <0.58 <4.62.6<0.3223<0.50 <0.54 <0.60 <0.48SSVP-3 1/4/2018 Offices1,070<2.7 <3.8 <12 <4.7 <5.24.1 4.0<5.9 <2.5 <4.1 <9.2 <4.9 <4.8 <7.219<5.9 <4.8415<5.2 <4.3 <5.9 <4.9SSVP-4 1/4/2018 Warehouse #1 Storage Room494<1.8 <2.6 <8.3 <3.1 <3.538.6 3.4<3.9 <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.2 <4.87.9 2.6 J<3.280.5<3.5 <2.9 <3.9 <3.3SSVP-5 1/4/2018 Former Boiler Room36.3<1.8 <2.6 <8.3 <3.1 <3.52.9 3.4<3.9 <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.2 <4.8 <2.92.4 J<3.2143<3.5 <2.9 <3.9 <3.3SSVP-6 1/4/201817<1.8 <2.6 <8.3 <3.1 <3.51.4 J<2.5 <3.9 <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.2 <4.8 <2.9 <4.0 <3.221.1<3.5 <2.9 <3.9 <3.3SSVP-7 /8.6<1.8 <2.6 <8.3 <3.1 <3.5 <2.42.0 J<3.9 <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.2 <4.8 <2.92.2 J<3.28.9<3.5 <2.9 <3.9 <3.3Duplicate16<1.8 <2.6 <8.3 <3.1 <3.52.5 2.0 J<3.9 <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.2 <4.8 <2.92.3 J<3.211<3.54.7<3.9 <3.31/4/2018112<1.8 <2.6 <8.3 <3.1 <3.51.4 J 4.7<3.9 <1.7 <2.8 <6.1 <3.2 <3.2 <4.81.5 J 2.4 J<3.2152<3.5 <2.9 <3.9 <3.32/13/201922<0.28 <0.26 <0.93 <0.53 NA4.0 J<0.43 <0.36 <0.28 <0.49 <0.60 <0.25 <0.32 <0.58 <4.62.2<0.3229<0.50 <0.54 <0.60 <0.48HHSS-1 10/4/2018 Former TCE Degreaser91.7<1.87.7299141.7 J 28 17<3.9 <1.7 <2.815<3.2 <3.2 <4.82.4 J 3.2 J<3.2148<3.5 <2.9 <3.91.6 JHHSS-2 10/4/2018 Former Tooling/Milling47.5<1.862.9<8.3 <3.1 <3.512 1.3 J<3.90.81 J 3.8<6.1 <3.2 <3.2 <4.82.8 J 2.9 J<3.258.4 18 12 8.4 8.6HHSS-3 10/4/2018 Former Hazardous Waste Storage Area449<1.8 <2.6 <8.33.8<3.5213 9.0 3.4 J<1.7 <2.82.9 J<3.2 <3.2 <4.8 <2.93.0 J<3.2106<3.530<3.9 <3.3HHSS-4 10/4/2018 Former Pump/Compressor Room142 7.5 5.4<8.3 <3.1 <3.523 21 2.8 J<1.7 <2.8 <6.126 10<4.8 <2.93.0 J 12 184 3.3 J 20<3.92.6 J220,000 14 120 850 35 NS 35,000 4,900 41 630 42,000 1.6 580 1,400 1,400 190 700 NS NS 370 490 NS 2,8002,700,000 180 1,600 11,000 440 NS 440,000 61,000 530 7,900 530,000 20 7,700 18,000 18,000 2,500 8,800 NS NS 4,900 6,100 NS 35,000Notes:1) North Carolina Department of Enviornmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Non-Residential Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) (February 2018)2) DEQ DWM Non-Residential SGSLs (February 2018)**Building removed with only concrete slab remainingOnly compounds detected in at least one sample shownµg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; NS = Not Specified; NA = Not AnalyzedJ = estimated concentration above laboratory method detection limit and below report limitBold indicates concentration exceeds DWM Residential SGSLUnderlined indicates concentrations exceeds DWM Non-Residential SGSLNon-Residential Screening Level (2)µg/m3Warehouse #1Residential Screening Level (1)Sample IDSampling DateAnalytical Method1/4/2018SSVP-2SSVP-8Area of ConcernPortion of SiteFormer Kaiser Technologies**TO-15Warehouse #2Warehouse #3Former Henkel ChemicalS:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables4/23/2019Table 5 (Page 1 of 2)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 5Summary of Sub-Slab Vapor Analytical Results Kaiser Fluids Tech IICharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. AMK-011SSVP-1 1/4/20181/4/20182/13/2019SSVP-3 1/4/2018 OfficesSSVP-4 1/4/2018 Warehouse #1 Storage RoomSSVP-5 1/4/2018 Former Boiler RoomSSVP-6 1/4/2018SSVP-7 /Duplicate1/4/20182/13/2019HHSS-1 10/4/2018Former TCE DegreaserHHSS-2 10/4/2018Former Tooling/MillingHHSS-3 10/4/2018 Former Hazardous Waste Storage AreaHHSS-4 10/4/2018 Former Pump/Compressor RoomNotes:1) North Carolina Department of Enviornmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Non-Residential Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) (February 2018)2) DEQ DWM Non-Residential SGSLs (February 2018)**Building removed with only concrete slab remainingOnly compounds detected in at least one sample shownµg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; NS = Not Specified; NA = Not AnalyzedJ = estimated concentration above laboratory method detection limit and below report limitBold indicates concentration exceeds DWM Residential SGSLUnderlined indicates concentrations exceeds DWM Non-Residential SGSLNon-Residential Screening Level (2)Warehouse #1Residential Screening Level (1)Sample IDSampling DateAnalytical Method1/4/2018SSVP-2SSVP-8Area of ConcernPortion of SiteFormer Kaiser Technologies**TO-15Warehouse #2Warehouse #3Former Henkel ChemicalHexane2-HexanoneIsopropyl AlcoholMethylene ChlorideMethyl Isobutyl KetonePropyleneStyrene1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene2,2,4-TrimethylpentaneTertiary Butyl AlcoholTetrachloroethyleneTetrahydrofuranTolueneTrichloroethyleneTrichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)1,1,2-Trichloro- 1,2,2-trifluoroethane (Freon 113)Vinyl ChlorideVinyl Acetatem,p-Xyleneo-XyleneXylenes (Total)<2.8 <3.3125<2.8 <3.3 <3.4 <3.4 <4.4 <3.9 <3.9 <3.71.7 J 12<2.43.8<0.86 <4.5 <6.1 <2.0 <2.82.0 J<3.52.0 J<2.8 <3.315<2.82.0 J<3.4 <3.4 <4.4 <3.9 <3.9 <3.71.3 J 3.3<2.4 <3.0 <0.86 <4.5 <6.1 <2.0 <2.83.0 J<3.53.0 J<1.2 <0.49 <0.60 <0.84 <0.39 <0.34 <0.53 <0.41 <0.63 <0.62 NA NA5.8<0.390.99<0.431.6 J<0.93 <0.323.1 J<1.0 <0.54 <1.54<4.2 <4.91,360<4.2 <4.9 <5.3 <5.1 <6.5 <5.9 <5.9 <5.66.1 8.1<3.53.8 J<1.3 <6.7 <9.2 <3.1 <4.28.7 2.6 J 11<2.82.0 J 33.9<2.82.5 J 2.6 J<3.4 <4.4 <3.9 <3.9 <3.74.9<1.1 <2.41.4 J 2.5<4.5 <6.1 <2.0 <2.8 <3.5 <3.5 <3.5<2.8 <3.38.4<2.8 <3.3 <3.4 <3.4 <4.4 <3.9 <3.9 <3.71.5 J 1.5<2.41.4 J 1.6<4.5 <6.1 <2.0 <2.8 <3.5 <3.5 <3.5<2.8 <3.3 <2.0 <2.8 <3.31.7 J<3.4 <4.4 <3.9 <3.9 <3.71.2 J 168<2.4 <3.012<4.5 <6.1 <2.0 <2.8 <3.5 <3.5 <3.5<2.8 <3.3 <2.0 <2.8 <3.31.2 J<3.4 <4.4 <3.9 <3.9 <3.7 <2.410<2.4 <3.0 <0.86 <4.5 <6.1 <2.0 <2.8 <3.5 <3.5 <3.5<2.8 <3.3 <2.0 <2.8 <3.31.3 J<3.4 <4.4 <3.9 <3.9 <3.7 <2.415<2.4 <3.00.91<4.5 <6.1 <2.0 <2.8 <3.5 <3.5 <3.5<2.8 <3.336.6<2.8 <3.31.5 J<3.43.2 J<3.9 <3.9 <3.71.4 J 6.8<2.41.5 J<0.86 <4.5 <6.1 <2.0 <2.8 <3.5 <3.5 <3.5<1.2 <0.492.6 J<0.84 <0.39 <0.34 <0.534.6<0.63 <0.62 NA NA6.4<0.391.2<0.431.5 J<0.93 <0.32 <0.34 <1.0 <0.54 <1.543.0<3.340.3 3.5<3.310<3.4228<3.9 <3.9 <3.73.9161145.766.63.5 J 3.6 J<2.0 <2.84.0 1.8 J 5.613<3.38.1 4.5<3.3 <3.42.0 J 2.3 J 28 5.4 4.5<2.43.7<2.49.0372.4 J<6.1 <2.0 <2.866 7.8 73.81.8 J 155 16<2.8191 21.8<3.45.5<5.9 <3.9 <3.783.7 4.8<2.45.3 5.9 2.4 J<6.1 <2.012 4.0<3.54.02.5 J 2.1 J 45.5<2.8 <3.3160<3.486.8<5.9 <3.9 <3.76.7 113<2.45.7493<4.5 <6.11.7 J<2.813 4.2 174,900 210 1,400 4,200 35,000 21,000 7,000 35,000 420 420 NS NS 280 14,000 35,000 14 NS 35,000 56 1,400 700 700 70061,000 2,600 NS 53,000 260,000 260,000 88,000 440,000 5,300 5,300 NS NS 3,500 180,000 440,000 180 NS 440,000 2,800 18,000 8,800 8,800 8,800µg/m3S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Tables\Analytical Data Tables4/23/2019Table 5 (Page 2 of 2)Hart & Hickman, PC

Figures
0 2000 4000
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEETN
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAPS
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
TITLE
PROJECT
SITE LOCATION MAP
KAISER FLUIDS TECH II
530 EAST SUGAR CREEK ROAD &
4100 EAST RALEIGH STREET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
JOB NO:
REVISION NO:
FIGURE:
4-20-19 0
EMP-1AMK-011
Derita, NC 1993
530 E. Sugar Creek Road
2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100Charlotte, NC 28203
704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f)
4100 E. Raleigh Street
MW-11SB-3RALEIGH STREETEAST SUGAR CREEK ROADESTRAMONTE CHIROPRACTIC(402 E. SUGAR CREEK ROAD)CONCRETE SUPPLYCOMPANY(4110 GREENSBORO STREET)GENERALBONDEDWAREHOUSE(4001 RALEIGH STREET)FORMER HENKEL SITE(4100 E. RALEIGH STREET)TRYONMALLCLEANERS(451 E. SUGARCREEK ROAD)COTTSMANTRANSMISSION(501 E. SUGARCREEK ROAD)PARKING LOTMW-10MW-5RW-2RW-1RW-4RW-3MW-1MW-2MW-8MW-3MW-7MW-4MW-6SB-6/TMW-2SB-2SB-4SB-5SB-7SB-8SB-12SB-13SB-11SB-10COMPRESSORS,RECEIVERS ANDTRANSFORMERFORMERDEBURRINGAREAFORMERSETTLINGTANKFORMERTCE DEGREASEROLDBOILERROOMFORMERDESIGN/ENGINEERINGFORMEROFFICE/ADMINFORMEROFFICE/ADMINFORMER RCRAROOMFORMERR & OROOMFORMERENG.LABFORMERASSEMBLYFORMER HYDRAULICPUMPS ANDCOMPRESSORS ROOMFORMER HAZARDOUSWASTE STORAGE AREALOADINGDOCKFORMERGRINDING FORMERTOOLING/MILLINGFORMERNUMERICALCONTROL LATHESFORMERPAINT BOOTHCONCRETEPATCHEDPITSRW-1APAINT BOOTHSUMPKAISER FLUIDS TECH II530 EAST SUGAR CREEK ROADCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA SAMPLE LOCATION MAPSB-1/TMW-1MW-9SB-9/TMW-3LEGENDSITE PROPERTY BOUNDARYFENCE LINEGROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLSOIL BORING (SEPTEMBER 2011)SOIL BORING AND TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL (SEPTEMBER 2011) SOIL BORING (OCTOBER 2018) TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL(OCTOBER 2018)SOIL GAS SAMPLE (OCTOBER 2018)SUB-SLAB VAPOR SAMPLE (OCTOBER2018)FLOOR DRAINTRENCH DRAINFORMER SETTLING TANK EXCAVATIONSTORM DRAIN2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 GeologyAOC #1 - FORMER SETTLINGTANK EXCAVATION AREAAOC #3 - FORMER TCEDEGREASER, PAINT BOOTH,AND LATHE AREAAOC #2 - FORMERCOMPRESSORS, RECEIVERS,AND TRANSFORMER AREAAOC #6 - FLOOR DRAINS INFORMER PUMP / COMPRESSORAND R & O ROOMSAOC #4 - FORMER RCRAROOMAOC #5 - LOADING DOCK ANDFORMER HAZARDOUS WASTESTORAGE AREAHHTMW-1HHTMW-2HHTMW-3HHTMW-4HHSB-1HHSG-1HHSB-2HHSG-2HHSB-29HHSB-3HHSB-4HHSB-5HHSG-3HHSG-4HHSG-5HHSG-6HHSB-6HHSB-9HHSB-7HHSB-8HHSS-1HHSS-2HHSB-30HHSB-31HHSS-3HHSS-4HHSB-10HHSB-11S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Figures\Site Map-R1.1.dwg, FIG 2, 12/7/2018 3:11:54 PM,SVincent
EMP-2GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
KAISER FLUIDS TECH II
4100 EAST RALEIGH STREET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
RAILROAD TRACKS
FORMER RAILROAD SIDING
FENCE LINE
FORMER WASTEWATER EFFLUENTLINE FROM TRENCH DRAINS
FLOOR DRAINS (ABANDONED)
CATCH BASIN (ABANDONED)
PAD-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER
POLE-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
ABANDONED/DESTROYEDMONITORING WELL LOCATION
SUB-SLAB VAPOR SAMPLE
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
SOIL BORING (OCTOBER 2018)
SOIL GAS SAMPLE (OCTOBER 2018)
TEMPORARY WELL (OCTOBER 2018)
SOIL BORING (FEBRUARY 2019)
SOIL GAS SAMPLE (FEBRUARY 2019)
FORMER STORAGE BUILDING(REMOVED IN 2012)
AREAS OF KNOWN PCB SOIL CONTAMINATION
AREA OF KNOWN PCB SLAB CONTAMINATION
PROPOSED EXTENT OF PARKING LOTEXPANSION
NEW BUILDING ADDITION
PORTION OF BUILDING TOBE DEMOLISHED ANDREPLACED
HHTMW-6
HHTMW-5
HHSG-7HHSB-12
HHSB-13 HHSB-14
HHSB-15
HHSG-8
HHSG-9
HHSB-18
HHSB-17
HHSB-21
HHSB-19
HHSB-20
HHSB-22
HHSB-23
HHSB-24
HHSB-25
HHSB-26
HHSB-28
HHSB-32
HHSB-16
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-7
MW-5 MW-6
SSVP-8
SSVP-7
SSVP-6
SSVP-4
SSVP-5
SSVP-3SSVP-2
SSVP-1
CS-8
CS-7
CS-3
CS-5
CS-4
CS-2
CS-1
HHSB-39
HHSB-38
HHSB-37
HHSB-36
HHSB-35
HHSG-11
HHSG-10
HHSB-34
CS-6
W2SB-1
W2SB-2
W2SB-3
W2SB-4
W2SB-5
W2SB-6
W2SB-7
W2SB-8
W2SB-9
W2SB-10
HHSB-27
HHSB-28
HHSB-15B
HHSB-15G
HHSB-15A
HHSB-15C HHSB-15D
HHSB-27H
HHSB-27C HHSB-27F
HHSB-27E
HHSB-27G
HHSB-27A
HHSB-27D
HHSB-15E
HHSB-15H
HHSB-15F
HHSB-27B
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Anthony Kuhn - AMK\AMK-011 Henkel-Kaiser BF Site\Figures\Sample Location Map_Large_R1.dwg, FIG 2, 4/3/2019 1:00:54 PM, erichardsonFIGURE NO. EMP-3
Appendix A
Site Plans
RALEIGH STREET100' Public R/W M.B. 20, PG. 75(CDOT MAINTAINED) 35 MPH E. SUGAR CREEK RD (BRIDGE)Variable Width Public (DOT Proj. No. 57500.2.FRA01)DOT Proj. NO. 57500.2.FRA01Southern Railway Company 200' total R/WPER RIGHT OF WAY AND TRACK MAP OF THE NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY DATED 12-31-1927City of Charlotte Light Rail Line(Blue Line Extension) under constructionCity of Charlotte Light Rail Line(Blue Line Extension) under constructionC CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
NOTES:NO.REVISIONS:BY:DATE:1318-e6 central ave.charlotte, nc 28205urbandesignpartners.comnc firm no: P-0418sc coa no: C-03044P 704.334.3303F 704.334.3305Date:Designed by:Drawn By:Project No:Sheet No:Station House
4100 Raleigh Street, Charlotte, NC 28213
Sugar Creek Station, LLC
Anthony Kuhn
427 Shasta Lane
Charlotte, NC 28211UDPUDP10.19.1818-105Site Plan DEVELOPMENT SUMMARYTAX PARCEL ID #:091-072-04TOTAL SITE AREA:3.72 ACEXISTING ZONING:TOD-M (O)FLOOR AREA RATIO:80%SETBACKS:FRONT :RALEIGH STREET:16' FROM BOCE. SUGAR CREEK:16' FROM EDGE OF BRIDGESIDE: 5'REAR: 5'MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT:40' (10' ADDITIONAL FOR EVERY100' FROM RESIDENTIALYZONED PROPERTY = 85' MAX)DISTANCE FROM RESIDENTIALYZONED PROPERTY:800'PROPOSED USE:OFFICE: 87,000 SFRESTAURANT: 12,000 SFOPEN SPACE:REQUIRED: N/A (ADAPTIVE REUSE)VEHICULAR PARKING:OFFICE:REQUIRED:290 MAX. (1 SPACE / 300 SF)PROPOSED:62 SPACES (9 ON-STREET)RESTAURANT:REQUIRED:40 MIN. (1 SPACE / 300 SF)PROPOSED:80 SPACESTOTAL PROPOSED:ACCESSIBLE:4 REGULAR & 2 VANCOMPACT29 (20% OF TOTAL)BICYCLE PARKING:OFFICE:REQUIRED:LONG-TERM:9 (1 SPACE / 10,000 SF)SHORT-TERM:3 (1 SPACE / 40,000 SF)PROPOSED:LONG-TERM:9 SPACES (INSIDE, REF ARCH)SHORT-TERM:3 SPACESRESTAURANT:REQUIRED:LONG-TERM:2 (1 SPACE / 10,000 SF)SHORT-TERM:4 (5% OF VEHICLE PARKING)PROPOSED:LONG-TERM:2 SPACESSHORT-TERM:4 SPACESC-3.0 PAVEMENT KEY:
RALEIGH STREET100' Public R/W M.B. 20, PG. 75(CDOT MAINTAINED) 35 MPH E. SUGAR CREEK RD (BRIDGE)Variable Width Public (DOT Proj. No. 57500.2.FRA01)DOT Proj. NO. 57500.2.FRA01Southern Railway Company 200' total R/WPER RIGHT OF WAY AND TRACK MAP OF THE NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY DATED 12-31-1927City of Charlotte Light Rail Line(Blue Line Extension) under constructionCity of Charlotte Light Rail Line(Blue Line Extension) under constructionNO.REVISIONS:BY:DATE:1318-e6 central ave.charlotte, nc 28205urbandesignpartners.comnc firm no: P-0418sc coa no: C-03044P 704.334.3303F 704.334.3305Date:Designed by:Drawn By:Project No:Sheet No:Station House
4100 Raleigh Street, Charlotte, NC 28213
Sugar Creek Station, LLC
Anthony Kuhn
427 Shasta Lane
Charlotte, NC 28211UDPUDP10.19.1818-105Demolition Plan DEMO HATCH LEGEND:C-2.1 DEMOLITION NOTES:
TRUE
PROJECT NO:
SHEET IDENTIFIER
CHARLOTTE, NC RICHMOND, VA
CONSULTANT
P.I.C.
P MGR.
P ARCH.
DESIGN BY
JOB CAPTAIN
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
SHEET TITLE
212 South Tryon Street
Suite 980
Charlotte, NC 28281
(T) 704-414-1000 (F) 704-414-1111
www.odell.com
ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION
FULL SET ISSUES
ADDENDA OR MODIFICATION
5 4 3 2 1
5 4 3 2 1
ABCDABCDFOR CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT DOCUMENT12/07/2018CD
12/7/2018 9:38:48 AMBIM 360://4082-002_StationHouse_Phase2_Office/4082-002_StationHouse_Phase2 OFFICE_Arch_20181114.rvt3D Views
4100 RALEIGH ST.
Charlotte, NC 28213
STATION HOUSE -
OFFICE BUILDING
AE900
4082-001
B. BARTHOLOMEW
Checker
M. MONTGOMERY
J. BLAIN
B. BARTHOLOMEW
M. BAUJAN
Author

NORTH WEST CORNER GROUND VIEWSC5

SOUTH WEST CORNER GROUND VIEWA5
SOTH WEST CORNER AERIAL VIEWA3
ODELL Associates, Inc., All Rights Reservedc2018
REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION

NORTH WEST CORNER AERIAL VIEWC3

Appendix B Grading Plan
C CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC RALEIGH STREET100' Public R/W M.B. 20, PG. 75(CDOT MAINTAINED) 35 MPH E. SUGAR CREEK RD (BRIDGE)Variable Width Public (DOT Proj. No. 57500.2.FRA01)DOT Proj. NO. 57500.2.FRA01Southern Railway Company 200' total R/WPER RIGHT OF WAY AND TRACK MAP OF THE NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY DATED 12-31-1927City of Charlotte Light Rail Line(Blue Line Extension) under constructionCity of Charlotte Light Rail Line(Blue Line Extension) under constructionGRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE NOTES:NO.REVISIONS:BY:DATE:1318-e6 central ave.charlotte, nc 28205urbandesignpartners.comnc firm no: P-0418sc coa no: C-03044P 704.334.3303F 704.334.3305Date:Designed by:Drawn By:Project No:Sheet No:Station House
4100 Raleigh Street, Charlotte, NC 28213
Sugar Creek Station, LLC
Anthony Kuhn
427 Shasta Lane
Charlotte, NC 28211UDPUDP10.19.1818-105Grading and Storm Drainage PlanC-4.0POST CONSTRUCTION SUMMARYTAX PARCEL NUMBERS:091-072-04DEVELOPMENT TYPE: MIXED USESUBJECT TO PCCO:YESPOST CONSTRUCTION DISTRICT: CENTRAL CATAWBASITE AREA: 3.72 ACEXISTING IMPERVIOUS:141,825 SF3.26 ACEXISTING BUILT-UPON AREA:88%PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS:139,208 SF3.20 ACPROPOSED BUILT-UPON-AREA:86%DENSITY:HIGHDEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT: REDEVELOPMENTNATURAL AREA REQUIRED:N/ASTREAM BUFFER PROTECTED ONSITE: N/ATRANSIT STATION:YESDISTRESSED BUSINESS DISTRICT:YESMITIGATION TYPE:PAYMENT IN-LIEUNATURAL AREA MITIGATION:N/ABUFFER MITIGATION:N/ATOTAL PHOSPHORUS MITIGATION:N/AGENERAL NOTE:THIS PLAN DOES NOT INCLUDESTORM DRAINAGE QUANTITIES