20050_Rite Aid_FINAL EMP_20190328

Environmental Management Plan

Rite Aid Site
(Former Charlotte Army Missile Plant)
Charlotte, North Carolina

Brownfields Project # 20050-16-060

H&H Job No. ATL-001
March 13, 2017
(Revised March 28, 2019)

S:\AAA-Master Projects\ATCO LLC - ATC\Task-012 BF Agreement\EMP\Rite Aid - Cover Pages and Contigency.doc

CONTENTS
Completed EMP Template Form

Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map and Vicinity Map

Appendices

Appendix A Rezoning Plan
Appendix B Data Summary Maps and Tables (includes Exhibit 2)
Appendix C Contingency Plan
Appendix D Brownfields Agreements for the Rite Aid Brownfields Site and the Former
Charlotte Army Missile Plant (MV Hercules) Brownfields Site

1 
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM 
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in the 
North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a project manager for the program.  
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all 
pertinent attachments to their project manager prior to any site earthmoving or other 
development related activities.  For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it must be completed, 
reviewed by the program, and signed by all signers at the bottom.  Consult your project 
manager if you have questions. 

GENERAL INFORMATION 

Date:   3/28/2019 

Brownfields Assigned Project Name:   Rite Aid Facility 

Brownfields Project Number:  20050‐16‐060 

Brownfields Property Address:  1776 Statesville Avenue and 1701‐1705 N. Graham Street, Charlotte, 
NC, Mecklenburg County, 28206 

Brownfields Property Area (acres):  47.76 

Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?     ☐  Yes   ☒ No 
If yes enter Permit No.: Click here to enter text. 

Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit?  ☐ Yes  ☒ No 
  If yes, enter Permit No.: Click here to enter text. 

COMMUNICATIONS 

Prospective Developer (PD):  CAMP Landowner, LP 
Phone Numbers:    Office:  718‐326‐3560…..Mobile:  Click here to enter text. 
Email:  [e-mail] 
Primary PD Contact: Scott Carr – Camp North End 
Phone Numbers:  Office:  704‐682‐7159 or [e-mail]   Mobile:  same 
Email: 
Environmental Consultant:  Hart & Hickman, PC (Attn: Matt Ingalls) 
Phone Numbers:    Office:  (704) 887‐4617…..Mobile:  (704) 560‐5767 
Email:  [e-mail] 
 Brownfields Program Project Manager: Carolyn Minnich 
  Office:  (704) 661‐0330 
2 
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 
  Email:   [e-mail] 

Other DENR Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch, 
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste): Doug Rumford (919‐707‐8334 and [e-mail])    

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM 

Advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager:  Check each box to accept minimum 
notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task: 
On‐site assessment or remedial activities:      Within 10 days ☒  
Construction or grading start:      Within 10 days  ☒ 
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously 
unknown contamination:      Within 48 hours ☒  
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood, or soil erosion control 
measures in area of contamination, venting of explosive environments):   
Within 48 hours  ☒ 
Installation of mitigation systems:        Within 10 days ☒ 
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement 
redevelopment activities: (as applicable):       Within 30 days ☒ 

REDEVELOPMENT PLANS 

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):    
☒ Residential   ☒ Recreational  ☒  Institutional  ☒ Commercial  ☒ Office   ☒Retail  ☒ Industrial   
☒  Other  specify: high‐density residential, parking, entertainment, hotel, storage unit, amenity space, 
and transit 

2)  Summary of Redevelopment Plans (attach conceptual or detailed plans as available):  
a) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:  ☒ Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Unknown 
b)  Do plans include removal of building foundation slab(s) or pavement:   
☒  Yes  ☐ No   ☐ Unknown 
c) Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building 
slabs/pavement and other structures:  The PD is developing the Brownfields Site in stages and 
the proposed uses of the site include office, industrial, commercial, retail, high‐density 
residential, parking, entertainment, hotel, storage unit. amenity space, recreation, institutional, 
and transit.  The site is zoned for UMUDD‐O and preliminary site rezoning documents are 
provided in Appendix A.    

3)  Which category of risk‐based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the 
Brownfields Agreement? 
3 
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 
☒ Residential    ☒ Non‐residential or Industrial/Commercial 

Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall be cited in the Brownfields 
Agreement for comparison purposes.  

4)  Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule): 
a) Phase I start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):                  
4/1/2017 
The first phase of development included subsurface utility installation activities (including removal of 
asphalt pavement) in the northern portion of the site and possible demolition of Building 48.   This first 
phase of work occurred in April‐May 2017.  Projects implemented in 2018 inluded installation of 
canopies in an outdoor public space west of Building 48; renovation to the Gamma Goat Building (a.k.a. 
Bldg 1 A/B located at 1701‐1705 N. Grahma Street); and upfit of Building 3 (Bay 1).  Pending activities 
include installation of a vapor mitigation system within Building 2A and construction of the Keswick Cut 
through the Gamma Goat Building (Building 1 A/B) and Building 2 A/B.   Additional development plans 
will also include renovation of the interior of buildings to accommodate future tenants as needed. 

b) If applicable, Phase 2 start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each 
phase): Click here to enter a date. 
The second phase of development has not yet been determined.    

c) Additional phases planned?  If yes, specify activities if known: 
  ☐ Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Not in the foreseeable future   ☒Decision pending 
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: Click here to enter a date. 

CONTAMINATED MEDIA 
Contaminated Media (attach tabulated data summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with 
sample locations): 
Part 1. Soil:       ☒ Yes   ☐ No    ☐  Suspected         
Part 2. Groundwater:       ☒ Yes  ☐  No   ☐  Suspected         
Part 3. Surface Water:     ☐ Yes  ☒  No   ☐  Suspected         
Part 4.  Sediment:                          ☐ Yes   ☒ No    ☐ Suspected 
Part 5. Soil Vapor:       ☒ Yes  ☐  No   ☐  Suspected         
Part 6. Sub‐Slab Soil Vapor:         ☒  Yes ☐  No   ☐  Suspected         
Part 7. Indoor Air:              ☒  Yes  ☐  No   ☐  Suspected        

PART 1.  SOIL – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate 
using  known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure 
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations. 

4 
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list specific compounds):   Several polynuclear aromatic 
hydrocarbons (PAHs), metals, and chlorinated solvents have been detected at the site at 
concentrations exceeding North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) – Inactive 
Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs).   Of note, PAHs and 
metals (including arsenic, lead, manganese, and hexavalent chromium), were detected above 
Residential and Industrial PSRGs in shallow soil samples (SSB‐10 and HA‐3) collected below the 
water tower.  A recent composite soil sample collected from shallow soil (0‐1 ft bgs) below the 
water tower reported that TCLP lead was detected in the COMP‐1 (0‐1 ft) composite soil sample at a 
concentration (0.95 mg/L) below the maximum concentrations of contaminants for TCLP lead of 5.0 
mg/L.   The remaining RCRA metals analyzed for TCLP were not detected at concentrations above 
laboratory detection limits.  Therefore, the shallow soil (0‐1 ft bgs) located below the water is not 
considered to be hazardous in accordance with the US EPA.                                                                          
Several PAHs, trichloroethylene (TCE), and metals (including arsenic, antimony, chromium, 
hexavalent chromium, manganese, and thallium) were detected above Residential PSRGs in soil 
samples (SB‐8, SB‐25, SB‐26, SB‐28, SB‐29 and/or the Hoffman Pipe Pit Sample) collected adjacent to 
the former plating below and adjacent to Building 1.  The VOC 1,2,4‐trimethylbenzene was detected 
above the Residential PSRG in a soil sample SB‐17 collected adjacent to the UST basin located west 
of Building 48.  Additional detections of PAHs and metals were identified at the site at 
concentrations that exceed Residential PSRGs, which are presented on Exhibit 2 in Appendix B and 
are depicted on the survey plat.  The BF survey plat includes “Areas of Potential Soil Contamination” 
which require additional assessment and management of soil per the Brownfields Agreement.    
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):   Depths of known contaminants range from 
surficial soils (0 to 2 ft) below ground surface (bgs) at the water tower, deeper soil (10 to 12 ft) 
adjacent to a UST basin located west of Building #48, and both surfical (0 to 2 ft bgs) and deeper 
soils (5 to 10 ft bgs) near the former plating pit in Building  #1.   
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):   Soil disturbance has occurred in the 
area of the Gamma Goat Building (1701‐1705 N. Graham St.), in the area of the water 
tower, and near Building 3 – Bay 1 during recent redevelopment activities.  Grading 
activities occurred and will be conducted utilizing grading equipment (i.e. backhoes, front 
end loaders, bull dozers etc.).  The site development contractor has previoulsy and will 
continue to implement best management practices (i.e. implementation of silt fencing and 
berming) to manage soil on‐site during site redevelopment activities.  DEQ has been and 
will continue to be provided with updates and notification per the EMP as each Phase of 
redevelopment begins. 
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):  During recent redevelopment activities, surficial soil (< 2ft 
bgs) have been excavated during parking area grading activities.  It is anticipated the majority of 
future soil excavation will be to surficial (0 to 5 ft) deep soils except for over excavation activities 
that occurred in the area of former USTs which extended to depths as deep as 12 ft bgs. 
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):    To date, 5,000 CYs 
from redevelopment of the Gamma Goat Building (1701‐1705 N. Graham St), installation of 
pavement below the water tower, and removal of eight (8) USTs from tank basin located west of 
Bulding 48. 
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:  To 
date, 50 to100 CYs from removal of eight (8) USTs from tank basin located west of Building 48 (off‐
site disposal to Evo Corp permited facility) and approx. 50 to 100 CYs of soil from below the water 
tower approved by DEQ for disposal in the northeastern portion of the adjacent CAMP (Hercules 
Missile) Brownfields Site.   
5 
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable: To date, 
50 to‐100 CYs from removal of eight (8) USTs from tank basin located west of Building 48 (off‐site 
disposal to Evo Corp permited facility) 
IMPORTED FILL SOIL 

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?     ☒  Yes   ☐  No   ☐ Unknown 
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?  With approval from DEQ 
Brownfields based on sample data, approx. 555 tons (estimated 370 CYs) of clean import fill soil 
from the Railyard Brownfields property (BF #19054‐15‐060) located at 1414 and 1422 S Tryin St. in 
Charlotte, NC was imported and used as backfill in the UST basin located west of Bldg 48 where 
eight (8) x 6K fuel oil USTs were removed in February/March 2018.  
3) If yes, what is the depth of fill soil to be used at the property?    Unknown 
If a range of depths, please list the range. 

4) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide plan to analyze fill soil to 
demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards and can be considered clean for use at the 
Brownfields property (Check all that apply): 
   ☒   Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
 ☒  Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
 ☒   Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury, lead, 
selenium and silver) 
 ☐  Metals –Hazardous Substance List ‐14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium 
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, 
thallium, and zinc) 
 ☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium (speciated 
according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver, thallium, and 
zinc) 
 ☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method:  Click here to enter text. 
☐ Known borrow material (DESCRIBE SOURCE AND ATTACH SAMPLING PROFILE):  The PD 
plans to import limited amounts of organic rich topsoil from a commercial landscape material vendor for 
use in planters and in proposed landscapte areas.  The PD does not plan to collet samples of landscape 
materials prior to placement in the proposed landscape areas.                                                                                 
If imported soil will be brought to the brownfields property, the fill soil will be sampled before being 
brought to the site.  The number of samples to be collected will be dependent upon whether the fill soil 
is obtained from a virgin or previously developed site as follows: If soil is obtained from a known 
permitted quarry, then one soil sample will be collected from the borrow source prior to the soil being 
transported to the site or as approved by DEQ. If fill soil is obtained from an off‐site property that is not 
a known permitted quarry, a sampling plan will be developed and submitted for DEQ review.  DEQ 
approval of the sampling plan and analytical results is required prior to bringing soil on site. The specific 
sampling rate will be outlined in the above work plan.  However, generally if the proposed borrow 
source has not been previous developed (i.e. virgin land) soil samples at a rate of one per 500‐1,000 
cubic yards can be used as an estimate. If the borrow source property has been previously developed, it 
should be estimated that soil samples will be collected at a rate of approximately one per 400 cubic 
yards or as approved by DEQ. The borrow soil samples will be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA 
metals.  Soil will be considered suitable for use at the site if it does not contain compounds at  
6 
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 
concentrations above DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs or typical background levels for metals from samples 
on the Brownfields Property or immediate surrounding area. 

MANAGING ONSITE SOIL  

1) If soil in known or suspected areas of contamination is anticipated to be excavated from the 
Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields Property,or otherwise disturbed during site 
grading or other redevelopment activities, please provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates 
areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are acceptable, if only preliminary data 
available). 

2) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION –  Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the 
North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31‐261.35? ☒ Yes     ☐  No     

If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes generating the 
waste( include pertinent analytical results as needed).  Hexavalent chromium (7,980 mg/kg) has 
been detected in shallow soil below Building #1 within a pipe access area adjacent to a former 
plating area.   

If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained‐Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the North Carolina 
Contained‐In Policy? ☒ Yes     ☐  No     

NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS THE 
CONTAINED‐OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA CONTAINED‐IN POLICY THE 
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR 
HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS. 

3) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION – Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?: 
  ☒ Yes     ☐  No     
If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).   

  ☐ Ignitability 
  ☐ Corrosivity 
  ☐  Reactivity 
  ☐  Toxicity 
  ☒  TCLP results 
  ☒ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual hazardous 
constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory TCLP standard) 

If no, explain rationale: The hexavalent chromium concentrations noted above in shallow soil
below the floor in Building #1 within a pipe access area adjacent to a former plating area exceed
the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) criteria using the Rule of 20. Soil impacts
associated with USTs that stored virgin petroleum products are exempt from RCRA hazardous
waste disposal regulations. The remaining soil analytical data does not indicate detections in soil
capable of exceeding TCLP criteria using the Rule of 20. 

7 
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 
NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE SOIL MAY NOT 
BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR HAZARDOUS WASTE 
SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS. 

4) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in 
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite): 
 ☒  Preliminary Health‐Based Residential SRGs 2/1/2018 
 ☐  Preliminary Health‐Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs  Click here to enter a date. 
 ☐  Site‐specific risk‐based cleanup level, or acceptable concentrations determined via 
calculated cumulative risk. Enter details of methods used for determination/explanation: 
  Click here to enter text. 

5)  Check the following action(s) to be taken during excavation and management of said soils: 

☒  Manage fugitive dust from site: 
  ☒  Yes  ☐ No  
 If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale:  Significant areas of contaminated soil are not 
expected to be encountered or disturbed during the first phase of site redevelopment activities based 
upon previous soil sampling data.  The grading contractor will take into account conditions such as wind 
speed, wind direction, and moisture content of soil during soil grading and stockpiling activities to 
minimize dust generation.  In the event that contaminated soil is encountered during site 
redevelopment that requires excavation, particular attention will be paid by contractors to implement 
dust control measures as needed based on site and atmospheric conditions (i.e. by controlled water 
application, hydro‐seeding, and/or mulch, stone, or plastic cover).  Potentially impacted soil will be 
managed as described below. 

☒  Field Screening:   
  ☒ Yes  ☐ No  
If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale:  During soil disturbance at the site, the project 
environmental engineer will observe soils for evidence of potential significantly impacted soil in the 
“areas of potential soil contamination” as depicted on the Brownfields plat.  The project environmental 
engineer will also observe construction activities for potentially impacted soil during periodic site visits, 
while attending periodic meetings with Camp North End staff, and during periodic oversight/inspection 
of ongoing and future environmental activities.  Additionallly, Camp North End staff will notify project 
environmental engineer of significant pending redevelopment activities prior to commencement.  
During redevelopment activities, workers or contractors will also observe soils for evidence of potential 
significantly impacted soil in the remaining areas at the site that may not be suitable to leave in place in 
exposed areas at a residential use site.  Evidence of potential significant impacted soil includes a distinct 
unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e. chemicals, tanks, 
drums, etc.).  Should the above be noted during site work, the contractor will contact the project 
environmental engineer to observe the suspect condition.  If the project environmental engineer 
confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures below will be implemented.  As noted 
in Section 1.0, the environmental engineer will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within 48 
hours to advise that person of the condition. 

8 
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 
☒  Soil Sample Collection: 
  ☒ Yes   ☐ No  
If yes, describe method (e.g., in‐situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.); If no, explain rationale:  
During soil disturbance at the site, the project environmental engineer will contact DEQ to determine if 
soil samples will be needed in the “areas of potential soil contamination” as depicted on the Brownfields 
plat.  H&H does not anticipate collecting additional soil samples prior construction activities based on 
previous site assessment activities unless evidence of potential significant impacted soils are 
encountered.  If significant soil impact is encountered during grading and/or installation or removal of 
utilities, excavation will proceed only as far as needed to allow grading and/or construction of the utility 
to continue and/or only as far as needed to allow alternate corrective measures described below.  
Suspect significantly impacted soil excavated during grading and/or utility line installation or removal 
may be stockpiled and covered in a secure area to allow construction to progress.  Suspect impacted soil 
will be underlain by and covered with minimum 10‐mil plastic sheeting.  Based on the volume of soil, 
representative sample(s) will be collected for analysis of total VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA 8 metals plus 
hexavalent chromium.  If the results of analysis of the sample(s) indicate that the soil could potentially 
exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria using the Rule of 20, then the soil will also be 
analyzed for toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, and/or TCLP metals. 
Impacted soil will be handled in the manner described below based upon the laboratory analyses:                                          
1)  If no organic compounds are detected in a composite sample(s) (other than which are attributable to 
sampling or laboratory artifacts) and metals are consistent with background levels, then the soil will be 
deemed suitable for use as on‐site fill or as off‐site fill.  The proposed location(s) for off‐site placement 
of soil (other than a permitted facility) after receiving written approval for acceptance of the soil from 
the facility, which will be provided to DEQ for approval prior to taking the soil off‐site.                                                                
2) If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed the DEQ Residential PSRGs (other 
than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with background 
levels for metals), then the soil may be used on‐site as fill without condition or on the adjacent Hercules 
Brownfields site.                                                                                                                                                           
3)  If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs (other 
than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with background 
levels for metals), then the soil, with DEQ’s written approval, may be used on‐site or on the adjacent 
Hercules Brownfields site as fill below an impervious surface, or below at least 2 ft of compacted clean 
soil.  If the impacted soil with concentrations above Residential PSRGs is moved to an on‐site location, 
its location and depth will be documented, covered with a geotextile fabric so that its location can be 
identified if encountered in the future, and its location will be provided to DEQ in an updated survey 
plat.                                                                                                                                                                                 
4)  Impacted soil may be transported to a permitted Subtitle D landfill provided that the soil is accepted 
at the disposal facility, or to another permitted landfill after receiving approval from DEQ and prior to 
taking the soil off‐site.  In the unlikely event that the composite sample data indicates concentrations 
above TCLP hazardous waste criteria, then the soil must be transported off‐site to a permitted disposal 
facility that can accept or treat hazardous waste. 
☒  Stockpile impacted soil in accordance with NCDENR IHSB protocol in the current version of 
the “Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup”, and providing erosion control, prohibiting 
contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing 
contaminated runoff.   Explain any variances: 
Click here to enter text. 
9 
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 
☒   Analyze potentially impacted soil for the following chemical analytes: 
  ☒  Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
  ☒  Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
  ☒   Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury, 
lead, selenium and silver) 
  ☐  Metals –Hazardous Substance List ‐14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, 
chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, 
selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc) 
  ☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium 
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver,  
thallium, and zinc) 
  ☒ Other Constituent(s) & Analytical Method(s):  Hexavalent chromium 

☒  Proposed Measures to Obtain Pre‐Approval for Reuse of Impacted Soil within the 
Brownfields Property Boundary 
  ☒  Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager 
  ☒  Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on 
site map to Brownfields Project Manager once known 
  ☒  Use geotextile to mark depth of fill material (provide description of material) 
  ☒  Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill  ☒  
Describe cap or fill: The cut and fill plans have not yet been developed.  If 
contaminated soil is encountered, it will be placed under impervious materials or at least 2 ft 
of clean fill.  Potential impervious caps include the building foundations and paved areas.  
(provide location diagram) 
  ☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re‐
recorded if actions are Post‐Recordation). 
  ☒ Other: Upon written approval from the Brownfields Program, transport soil to 
adjacent Charlotte Army Missile Plant (MV Hercules) Brownfields Site (Project # 11044‐07‐060) 
located adjacent to the north. 

☒ Final grade sampling of exposed soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or permanent 
hardscape): [if not checked provide rationale for not needing] 
  Provide diagram of soil sampling locations, number of samples, and denote Chemical 
Analytical Program with check boxes below (Check all that apply):     
  ☒  Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
  ☒  Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
  ☒   Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury, 
lead, selenium and silver) 
  ☐  Metals –Hazardous Substance List ‐14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, 
chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, 
selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc) 
  ☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium 
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver, 
thallium, and zinc) 
 ☐ Pesticides 
 ☐ PCBs 
10 
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 
  ☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method:  hexavalent chromium 
OFFSITE TRANSPORT & DISPOSITION OF EXCAVATED SOIL  
NOTE: Unless soil will be transported offsite for disposal in a permitted facility under applicable 
regulations, no contaminated or potentially contaminated soil may leave the site without approval 
from the brownfields program.  Failure to obtain approval may violate a brownfields agreement, 
endangering liability protections and making said action subject to enforcement.  Justifications 
provided below must be approved by the Program in writing prior to completing transport activities. 
☒  Transport and dispose of impacted soil offsite (documentation of final disposition must be sent to 
Brownfields Project Manager) 
 ☒  Landfill – analytical program determined by landfill  
 ☒  Landfarm or other treatment facility  Click here to enter text. 
 ☐  Use as Beneficial Fill Offsite – provide justification:  Click here to enter text. 
 ☒  Use as Beneficial Fill at another Suitable Brownfields Site – (Note: a determination that a 
site is a “Suitable Brownfields” site will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same 
or similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil as beneficial soil will not 
increase the potential for risk to human health and the environment at that site, and that notarized 
documentation of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of the receiving site is 
provided to Brownfields.  Provide justification:  It is anticipated that soil from unimpacted areas of the 
subject site may be used as beneficial fill for the adajcent Charlotte Army Missile Plant (MV Hercules) 
site (Brownfields ID: 11044‐07‐060) located north of the subject site.  The MV Hercules site is owned by 
the same PD and soil contains manganese (410 to 1,800 mg/kg) and arsenic (7.4 mg/kg) at 
concentrations slightly above the IHSB screening levels, but VOCs and PAHs were not detected in the soil 
samples.  Background soil samples collected from the subject site also contained similar concentrations 
of manganese and arsenic.  These background soil metal concentrations were attributable to naturally 
occurring sources.  Impacted soil at the subject site also contains low levels of VOCs and PAHs that are 
not present on the adjacent MV Hercules site.   However, only unimpacted (background) soils from the 
subject site will be transported to the MV Hercules Site.  An analytical data summary table and a figure 
depicting sample locations for the MV Hercules Brownfields property are included in Appendix D.  Soils 
that will be imported to the MV Hercules site will be sampled for laboratory analysis of VOCs, SVOCs, 
and HSL metals in accordance with Appendix C (attached hereto).                                                                    
In March 2018, soil samples were collected in an abandoned railspur area located in the northeastern 
portion of the CAMP BF site to establish a baseline for use of this area for soil import from the CAMP 
and Rite Aid BF site.  Shallow soil samples collected in the area of the abandoned railspur reported the 
SVOC benzo(a)pyrene [3.0 mg/kg] at a concentration above the DEQ industrial/commercial PSRG.  
Additional SVOCs (benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, and 
indeno(1,2,3‐cd)pyrene) were detected at concentrations above unrestricted use PSRGs but below 
industrial/commercial PSRGs.  Arsenic was detected at concentrations above the industrial/commercial 
PSRG and slightly above the range of site‐specific background metals concentrations.  VOCs were not 
detected above above unrestricted use or industrial/commercial PSRGs.  

MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES 
☐  Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill 
(Preferred) 

☒  Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil  can safely be reused onsite and is not a 
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were 
11 
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 
removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth from 
which it was excavated. 

 ☒ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, and/or 
degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants? Result: Yes □ No □  
If no, include rationale here.   Click here to enter text.   
If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials 

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:   Although not anticpated, the 
contactor and workers will observe soil for potential impacts during utility installation activities.  In the 
event contaminated soil and/or vapors are encountered in utility trenches during redevelopment 
activities, the trench will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be performed 
to protect workers.  If results indicate further action is warranted in response to vapors to protect 
workers, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented.  If 
deemed warranted, the contractor and environmental engineer will evaluate if placement of a vapor 
barrier is necessary within utility trenches to prevent transport of soil vapor.                                                                                 
Evidence of potential significant impacted soil includes distinct unnatural color strong odor, or filled with 
previously disposed material of concern (i.e. chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.).  Should the above be noted 
during utility work, the contractor will contact the project environmental engineer to observe the 
suspect condition.  If the project environmental engineer confirms that the  material may be impacted, 
then the procedures outlined in Managing On‐Site Soil above will be implemented. In addition, the 
environmental engineering will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within two business days.    

PART 2.  GROUNDWATER  – Please fill out the information below and attach figure showing 
distribution of groundwater contaminants at site 

What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?    Depth to water at the site ranges 
from approximately 14 ft bgs in the northern portion of the site to approximately 25 ft bgs in the central 
portion of the site. 

Is groundwater known to be contaminated by    ☒onsite   ☐ offsite   ☐ both   ☐ or unknown  
sources?  Describe source(s):  Several VOCs, including benzene, chloromethane, 1,2‐dichloroethane 
(DCA), carbon tetrachloride, tetrachloroethylene (PCE), and TCE have been detected above the NC 2L 
Groundwater Quality Standards.  The primary constituent of concern is TCE.  Based on previous 
assessment, the source of TCE appears to be the result of former electroplating and degreasing 
opertions in the northeastern portion of the site.  The approximate location of the TCE plume in 
groundwater is depicted on Figure 3.  

What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?  Based on previous 
assessment activities, groundwater in the western and central portions of the Site flows in a north‐
northwesterly direction.  Groundwater in the eastern portion of the Site appears to flow in a generally 
easterly direction. 

Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?    ☐ Yes    ☒  No 
12 
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 
If yes, describe these activities:  Based on the anticipated depth to groundwater, groundwater is not 
anticipated to be encountered during any redevelopment activities.  However, construction document, 
grading plans, and cut/fill analysis have not been developled for the site. 

In the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if 
no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of 
groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary 
sewer, or sampling procedures):  Based on the anticipated depth to groundwater, groundwater is
not anticipated to be encountered during any redevelopment activities. Although not anticipated,
if groundwater suspected to be impacted (based on strong odor, unnatural color, sheen, etc.) is
encountered during site work, the contractor will contact the project environmental engineer to
observe the suspect condition. If the environmental engineer determines that the excavation
likely contains impacted groundwater, then appropriate worker safety measures will be
undertaken to manage groundwater that gathers in an open excavation within an area determined
to be impacted during construction activities. The accumulated water will be tested and disposed
off-site (if impacted), tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ
surface water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and State regulations for
erosion control and construction stormwater control, or used for dust control at the site.
Discharge to the storm sewer will be in accordance with the site’s sediment and erosion control
plan. In addition, the environmental engineer will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager
within 48 hours regarding the condition. 

PART 3.  SURFACE WATER – Please fill out the information below. 
Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property. 

Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated:    ☐  Yes  ☒  No    

Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment activities? 
     ☐ Yes    ☒  No 

In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities,  or 
clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of such events (e.g. 
flooding, contaminated surface water run‐off, stormwater impacts):  If surface water run-off gathers
in an open excavation determined during construction to be impacted, appropriate worker safety
measures will be undertaken. The accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate, tested and
disposed off-site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted
above DEQ surface water standards), in accordance with applicable municipal and State
regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control. It may also be used on-site
for dust control. Please note that in accordance with other applicable regulations, DEQ
Brownfields cannot automatically approve discharge of stormwater to a storm drain. DEQ
Brownfields should be notified prior to discharge of water in the stormwater system.  

PART 4.  SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below.   
Is sediment at the property known to be contaminated:    ☐  Yes  ☒  No    
13 
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 

Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment activities? 
     ☐ Yes    ☒  No 

If yes, attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property. 

In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):  Click here to enter text. 

PART 5.  SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below.   
Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following 
vapor intrusion screening levels in the following media: 

IHSB Residential Screening Levels: 
  Soil Vapor:    ☒ Yes      ☐  No     ☐  Unknown 
  Groundwater:  ☒ Yes      ☐  No     ☐  Unknown 

IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels: 
Soil Vapor:    ☒ Yes      ☐  No     ☐  Unknown 
  Groundwater:  ☒ Yes      ☐  No     ☐  Unknown 

Attach a map showing the location of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site screening levels.  

If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?  Click here to enter text. 

Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?  
    ☐ Yes    ☐  No  ☒  Unknown 

In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities (trenches, 
manways, basements or other subsurface work, list activities for management of such contact:  In the  
event contaminated soil vapors are encountered during redevelopment activities, the excavation area 
will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be performed.  If results indicate 
further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be 
implemented.  Additionally, the potential need for additional building vapor mitigation may be 
evaluated at such time.  If impacts inconsistent with those previously documented at the Site are 
identified, the Brownfields Project Manager will also be notified.   

PART 6.  SUB‐SLAB SOIL VAPOR ‐please fill out the information below if existing buildings or 
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment. 

Are sub‐slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property?    ☒ Yes   ☐  No  ☐  Unknown 

If data indicate that sub‐slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing 
the location of these exceedances. 
14 
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 

At what depth(s) is sub‐slab soil vapor known to be contaminated?   ☒  0‐6 inches  ☐  Other,  If other 
describe:  Refer to the Sub‐Slab Vapor table in Exhibit 2 of Appendix B for sub‐slab vapor exceedances 
and Figure 3 for sample locations. The VOCs including TCE were detected above Division of Waste 
Management (DWM) residential and non‐residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels (VISLs) in the 
northern portion of Building #1 and the eastern portion of Building #2, and above residential VISLs in 
Building #48 (northern portion of the site).  The sub‐slab vapor samples were collected from shallow 
intervals (less than 6‐inches) below the base of the concrete slabs in the existing site buildings.   

Will workers encounter contaminated sub‐slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?  
    ☐ Yes    ☐  No   ☒  Unknown 

In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such contact:  Although not anticipated, in the event contaminated soil 
vapors are encountered during redevelopment activities, the excavation area will be evacuated and 
appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be performed.  If results indicate further action is 
warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented and the 
DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified.   

PART 7.  INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below .  

Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property?    ☒   Yes   ☐  No    ☐  Unknown 

If yes, attach a map showing the location where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels. 

If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk‐based screening levels will not 
be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated indoor air 
during planned redevelopment activities?  
    ☒ Yes    ☐  No  ☐ Unknown 

In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such contact:  During redevelopment activities in the northern portion
of Building #1 where indoor air concentrations exceed DWM residential and non-residential
Indoor Air Screening Levels (IASLs), appropriate temporary engineering controls (such as use of
industrial fans) will be implemented until an appropriate permanent vapor mitigation system can
be installed within this portion of the structure. In the event contaminated vapors are
encountered during redevelopment activities within other site structures, the work area will be
evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be performed. If results indicate
further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will
be implemented.     

PART 8 – Vapor Mitigation System – Please fill out the information below .  

Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system proposed for this Brownfields Property? 
15 
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014 
       ☒ Yes    ☐  No  ☐ Unknown 

If yes, provide the date the plan was submitted to the Brownfields Program. 
The vapor mitigation plan will be provided under separate cover and will be signed and sealed 
by a North Carolina professional engineer. 
Attach the plan. 

Has the vapor mitigation plan been approved by the NC Brownfields Program? 
 ☐  Yes   ☒  No     ☐  Unknown 
Has the vapor mitigation plan been signed and sealed by a North Carolina professional engineer?      
☐ Yes    ☒  No 

What are the components of the vapor intrusion mitigation system? 
☒  Sub‐slab depressurization system 
☒  Sub‐membrane depressurization system 
☐  Block‐wall depressurization system 
☐ Drain tile depressurization system 
☐  Passive mitigation methods 
 ☒ Vapor barriers 
 ☒ Perforated piping vented to exterior 
☒  Other method:  The system within the northern portion of Building #1 were VOCs were
detected above residential and non-residential IASLs will likely be activated by installing
blowers as outlined in the Vapor Mitigation Plan (VMP) that will be submitted under separate
cover.  

PART 9.  CONTINGENCY FOR ENCOUNTERING UNKNOWN TANKS, DRUMS, OR OTHER WASTE 
MATERIALS 

Please provide a contingency plan in the event unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills,  or other 
waste materials are encountered during site activities. 

Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing  earth‐moving activities at 
the site: 
☐ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps) 
☐ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility lines, etc. 
☐ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors 

Notification to State Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other 
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of contamination are 
discovered.  See Notification Section on Page 1 for notification requirements. 
11
11
POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
In accordance with the site's Brownfield Agreement, provide a report within the designated schedule
to the State Brownfields Project Manager.
I&! Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a redevelopment summary report in compliance
with the site's Brownfields Agreement.
APPROVAL SIGNATURES
M4t~f931, 2019
Prospective r Date
Printed Name/Title/Company
Damon Hemmerdinger, authorized signatory
Date
11
11
Consultant
Printed Name/T /'1,4--rt t.1~ Lv' :C..tl 4-/&.tA--( p A ti A(2-J ~' ;_) L (L /l"IA tV
c
Date
16
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
TITLE
PROJECT
SITE LOCATION MAP
RITE AID
BROWNFIELDS SITE NO. 20050-16-060
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
JOB NO:
REVISION NO:
FIGURE NO:
03-01-17 0
1ATL-001
0 2000 4000
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEETN
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
CHARLOTTE EAST, NC
1967
REVISED/INSPECTED 1988
AND
DERITA, NC 1993
SITE
BUILDING #2
FORMER BOILER
HOUSE
BUILDING #48
BUILDING #1
BUILDING #3
BUILDING T-26EXECUTIVE OFFICE
REGIONAL TRAINING OFFICE
(FORMER CAFETERIA)
BUILDING #50
MV HERCULES
(FORMER CHARLOTTE ARMY MISSILE PLANT)
BROWNFIELDS NO. 11044-07-60
CEMETERYRESIDENTIAL
GAS STATION
SENIOR LIVING FACILITY
RETAIL
RETAIL/
COMMERCIAL
RITE AID FACILITY
1701-1703 N. GRAHAM STREET
JOB NO. ATL-001
REVISION NO. 0DATE: 3-2-17
FIGURE NO. 2
RITE AID FACILITY
BROWNFIELDS ID NO. 20050-16-060
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
VICINITY MAP
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
OAK
L
A
W
N

A
V
E
N
U
E STATESVILLE AVENUEN. GRAHAM STREETW
O
L
F
B
E
R
R
Y

S
T
R
E
E
Y
KE
S
W
I
C
K

A
V
E
N
U
E
S:\AAA-Master Projects\ATCO LLC - ATC\Task-012 BF Agreement\EMP\Figures\Vicinity Map.dwg, FIG 2, 3/2/2017 3:05:54 PM, zbarlow

Appendix A

Rezoning Plan
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
S
S
S
Norfolk-Southern RailwayGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASTax # 079-031-06
Tax # 079-031-04
Eckerd of North Carolina, Inc.
DB 3982 Pg. 233
Tax # 079-031-05
PARCEL 2
New Camp Land Owner, LP
DB 3811 Pg. 916
Tax # 079-031-02
PARCEL 1
New Camp Land Owner, LP
DB 3811 Pg. 916
Tax # 079-031-02
PARCEL 1
New Camp Land Owner, LP
DB 23004 Pg. 118
Tax # 079-031-01
Zoning: I-2
Tract 1, MB 46 Pg. 281
New Camp Land Owner, LP
DB 26445 Pg. 988
Zoning: I-2
New Camp Land Owner, LP
DB 26653 Pg. 397
Zoning: I-2
71' railroad R/W71' R/W (See Note #14)SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSNew Camp Land Owner, LP
DB 24339 Pg 82
Tax I.D. 079-031-03
Zoning: I-2
New Camp Land Owner, LP
DB 24339 Pg 82
Tax I.D. 079-031-03
Zoning: I-2
New Camp Land Owner, LP
DB 24339 Pg 82
Tax I.D. 079-031-03
Zoning: I-2
71' railroad R/W limitSSSSSS
SS
Zoning: I-2
Zoning: I-2
Zoning: I-2
Tax # 079-021-01
1516 Statesville Ave. LLC
DB 14097 Pg 760
Zoning: I-2
Tax # 079-021-11 City
of Charlotte DB 27969
Pg 247 Zoning: I-2
Mecklenburg County
ABC Board
Tax # 079-021-08
DB 4244 Pg 827
Zoning: I-2
Tax # 079-021-09
Emphasis Ads, Inc. DB
25397 Pg 417 Zoning: I-2
THERESA LUSK
Tax # 07901104
Zoning: I-2
HAWTHORNE CAPITAL LLC
Tax # 007910306
Zoning: I-2
HAWTHORNE CAPITAL, LLC
Tax # 07910305
Zoning: I-2
BANCROFT KESWICK LLC
Tax # 07910304
Zoning: I-2
BANCROFT KESWICK LLC
Tax # 07910303
Zoning: I-2
KENNETH W HILL
ESTHELA HILL
Tax # 07910204
Zoning: I-2
KENNETH W HILL
ESTHELA HILL
Tax # 07910203
Zoning: I-2
DAVID W ALLEN
Tax # 007910202
Zoning: I-2
HUGHES BUILDING MATERIALS LTD
Tax # 07910102
Zoning: I-2
VISION VENTURES OF CAROLINA LLC
TED HILL AND ASSOCIATES LLC
KATHLEEN EGAN MCALLISTER
REVOCABLE TRUST
Tax # 07910101
Zoning: I-2
JEREMY ZHENG
Tax # 07909901
Zoning: I-2
ESEL JAY OH
HANNAH OH
Tax # 07906104
Zoning: I-2
TRYON IMPORTS INC
Tax # 07906103
Zoning: I-2
A-1 DISTRIBUTING CO LLC
Tax # 07906554
Zoning: I-1
AUDWIN L ROSS
Tax # 07904123
Zoning: I-1
BOBBY LEE REITZEL
Tax # 07904122
Zoning: I-2METALS FREEDOM INC
Tax # 07904201
Zoning: I-2AUTO HARDWARE
Tax # 07904202
Zoning: I-2
BY ENTIRETY
RAY E HALL
Tax 07904203
Zoning: I-2TPM PROPERTIES LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
Tax # 07904204
Zoning: MUDD-OMecklenburg County
ABC Board
Tax # 079-021-08
DB 4244 Pg 827
Zoning: I-2MECKLENBURG COUNTY
C/O REAL ESTATE /FINANCE DEPT
Tax # 07904303
Zoning: NS01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
REVISIONS:DATE:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
Q.C. BY:
SHEET #:
SCALE:
PROJECT #:
CAMP NORTH END | REZONING
MIXED USE + INDUSTRIAL REHAB DEVELOPMENT
ATCO PROPERTIES & MANAGEMENT
27 FEBRUARY 2017
1016320 PETITION NO. 2017-xxx

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. www.LandDesign.com
V: 704.333.0325 F: 704.332.3246
223 N Graham Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
NC Engineering Firm License # C-0658
0'50'50' 100'200'
EXISTING CONDITIONS
AS SHOWN

RZ-00
NOTES:
EXISTING CONDITION PLAN DERIVED FROM VARYING SOURCES (I.E. MULTIPLE SURVEYS, GIS,
AERIAL RECONNAISSANCE, AND SITE OBSERVATIONS). ACTUAL SITE AND/OR CONTEXT
CONDITIONS MAY VARY. TO THE FULL KNOWLEDGE OF THE PETITIONER ALL KNOWN
EXISTING EASEMENTS AND ROW RESERVATIONS ARE SHOWN.
REZONING
BOUNDARY
REZONING
BOUNDARY
REZONING
BOUNDARY REZONING
BOUNDARY
Dalton Ave
N. Tryon StreetN. Graham StWoodward Ave
W.

2
4
t
h

S
t
Interstate 77Br
o
o
k
s
h
i
r
e

F
r
w
y

(
I
-
2
7
7
)Statesville AveN
VICINITY MAP
(not to scale)
SITE
Oakla
w
n
SITE INFORMATION
71.81 ACRES (+/- 3,127,825.80 SQFT)
07903101, 07903102, 07903103, 07903104, 07903105,
07903106
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (I-2)
WAREHOUSE, VACANT
NEWCAMP LANDOWNER LP
97-77 QUEENS BOULEVARD, SUITE 1103
REGO PARK, NY, 11374
SITE AREA
TAX PARCEL(S) INCLUDED WITHIN
THE AREA TO BE REZONED
EXISTING ZONING
EXISTING USES
PROPERTY OWNERS
ADJACENT OWNERSHIP LISTINGS*
1. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG
HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC
Tax # 07510543
Tax # 07510537
Zoning: NS
2. HEBREW CEMETERY
Tax # 07510528
Zoning: R-8
3. HEBREW CEMETERY ASSOC OF CLT
Tax # 07510620
Zoning: B-1
4. HEBREW BENEVOLENT SOCIETY
OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Tax # 07510613
Zoning: B-1
5. HEBREW CEMETRY ASSOC
OF CHAR
Tax # 07510611
Zoning: B-1
6. JETT ACQUISITIONS LLC
Tax # 07510607
Zoning: B-1
7. JETT ACQUISITIONS LLC
Tax # 07510602
Zoning: B-1
8. TDC GREENVILLE LLC
Tax # 07844101
Zoning: B-1
9. END SPOT
HOLDINGS II LLC
Tax # 07909944
Zoning: I-2
*ADDITIONAL OWNERSHIP INFORMATION SHOWN ON
PLAN
EXISTING
PROPERTY LINE
R.O.W.
R.O.W.
(LOCATION TO
BE VERIFIED)
EXISTING
SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
R.O.W.
R.O.W.
UTILITY
EASEMENT
R.O.W.
UTILITY
EASEMENT
R.O.W.
(LOCATION TO
BE VERIFIED)
UTILITY
EASEMENT
R.O.W.
(LOCATION TO
BE VERIFIED)
NEW RAIL
CROSSING
NEW RAIL
CROSSING
NEW RAIL
CROSSING
1P
4P
9P
8P
3P
7P
12P
13P
14P 15P
16P
17P
18P
6P
5P
10P
11P
FUTURE SIGNAL
APPROVED AS PART OF
CO.AQUATIC CENTER
IMPROVEMENTS
RELOCATED
DRIVEWAY
2P
VEHICULAR
ACCESS
VEHICULAR
ACCESS
VEHICULAR
ACCESS
STATESVILLE AVE.STATESVILLE AVE.WOODWARD

A
V
E VANDERBILT
ROADEDISON ST.LUCENA ST.N. GRAHAM ST.N. GRAHAM ST.W. 24T
H

S
T
.
WO
L
F
B
E
R
R
Y

S
T
.
SY
L
V
A
N
I
A

A
V
E
.
OAKLA
W
N
AVE.
FUTURE MECKLENBURG
COUNTY AQUATIC CENTER
VEHICULAR
ACCESS
VEHICULAR
ACCESS
KE
S
W
I
C
K

A
V
E
.
8
VEHICULAR
ACCESS
VEHICULAR
ACCESS
VEHICULAR
ACCESS
EXISTING BUILDING
TO REMAIN
EXISTING BUILDING
TO REMAIN
EXISTING BUILDING
TO REMAIN
EXISTING BUILDING
TO REMAIN
EXISTING BUILDING
TO REMAIN
EXISTING BUILDING
TO REMAIN
EXISTING BUILDING
TO REMAIN
3
10
9
7
5A
2A
12
2B
1B
1A
6
EXISTING BUILDING
TO REMAIN
11 15
16
13
71.
0
'
RA
I
L
R
A
O
D
R.
O
.
W
.
FUTURE CONNECTION
FUTURE CONNECTION
4
5B
14
2P
FUTURE CONNECTION
POTENTIAL MULTIMODAL
CONNECTIONS (WOONERF)
PUBLIC ROW
(REFER TO ROW FOR
PUBLIC STREET SECTIONS)
POTENTIAL
VEHICULAR ACCESS
EXISTING
SIGNAL
POTENTIAL PRIVATE STREETS
(WITH PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT)
POTENTIAL PARKING FIELD
CONNECTIONS / DRIVEWAYS
EXISTING VEHICULAR
ACCESS (DRIVEWAYS)
DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION
71.81 ACRES (+/- 3,127,825.80 SQFT)
07903101, 07903102, 07903103, 07903104, 07903105,
07903106
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (I-2)
UPTOWN MIXED USE DISTRICT-OPTIONAL
(UMUD-O)
WAREHOUSE, VACANT
INDUSTRIAL, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, RESTAURANT,
RETAIL, OFFICE, HOTEL, AND MULTIFAMILY. REFER
ALSO TO DEVELOPMENT NOTES FOR ADDITIONAL
USE INFORMATION.
PER THE ORDINANCE
(REFER TO DEVELOPMENT NOTES )
SITE AREA
TAX PARCEL(S) INCLUDED WITHIN
THE AREA TO BE REZONED
EXISTING ZONING
PROPOSED ZONING
EXISTING USES
PROPOSED USES
PARKING
AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE
DEVELOPMENT DATA TABLE
EXISTING / POTENTIAL USE
INDUSTRIAL
EATING / DINING
RETAIL
OFFICE
MULTI-FAMILY
TOTAL
TOTAL FUTURE
BUILD OUT
100,000 SF
80,000 SF
200,000 SF
1,500,000 SF
1,500 DU
EXISTING
1,240,000 SF
1,300,000 SF 1,880,000 SF
P
URBAN OPEN SPACE
EXISTING SURFACE
PARKING FIELD
POTENTIAL PARALLEL
ON-STREET PARKING
PROPOSED FUTURE
PUBLIC ROW
PROPOSED ANGLED OR
HEAD-IN ON-STREET PARKING
13
REVISIONS:DATE:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
Q.C. BY:
SHEET #:
SCALE:
PROJECT #:
CAMP NORTH END | REZONING
MIXED USE + INDUSTRIAL REHAB DEVELOPMENT
ATCO PROPERTIES & MANAGEMENT
27 FEBRUARY 2017
1016320 PETITION NO. 2017-xxx

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. www.LandDesign.com
V: 704.333.0325 F: 704.332.3246
223 N Graham Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
NC Engineering Firm License # C-0658
0'50'50' 100'200'
NOTES:
1. THE PLAN SHOWN IS INTENDED TO BE REVIEWED IN COLOR.
2. THE PLAN AND IMAGES SHOWN ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE FOR THE PURPOSES OF
REZONING. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ACTUAL CONDITIONS SHOULD BE FIELD VARIFIED.
3. REFER TO SECTIONS AND NOTES FOR PRIVATE STREET SETBACK AND ROW
INFORMATION.
TECHNICAL DATA SHEET
AS SHOWN

RZ-01
EXISTING
PROPERTY LINE
R.O.W.
R.O.W.
(LOCATION TO
BE VERIFIED)
EXISTING
SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTION
R.O.W.
R.O.W.
UTILITY
EASEMENT
R.O.W.
UTILITY
EASEMENT
R.O.W.
(LOCATION TO
BE VERIFIED)
UTILITY
EASEMENT
R.O.W.
(LOCATION TO
BE VERIFIED)
NEW RAIL
CROSSING
NEW RAIL
CROSSING
NEW RAIL
CROSSING
FUTURE SIGNAL
APPROVED AS PART OF
CO.AQUATIC CENTER
IMPROVEMENTS
VEHICULAR
ACCESS
VEHICULAR
ACCESS
VEHICULAR
ACCESS
STATESVILLE AVE.STATESVILLE AVE.WOODWARD

A
V
E VANDERBILT
ROADEDISON ST.LUCENA ST.N. GRAHAM ST.N. GRAHAM ST.W. 24T
H

S
T
.
WO
L
F
B
E
R
R
Y

S
T
.
SY
L
V
A
N
I
A

A
V
E
.
OAKLA
W
N
AVE.
FUTURE MECKLENBURG
COUNTY AQUATIC CENTER
VEHICULAR
ACCESS
VEHICULAR
ACCESS
KE
S
W
I
C
K

A
V
E
.
8
VEHICULAR
ACCESS
VEHICULAR
ACCESS
VEHICULAR
ACCESS
EXISTING BUILDING
TO REMAIN
EXISTING BUILDING
TO REMAIN
EXISTING BUILDING
TO REMAIN
EXISTING BUILDING
TO REMAIN
EXISTING BUILDING
TO REMAIN
EXISTING BUILDING
TO REMAIN
EXISTING BUILDING
TO REMAIN
3
10
9
7
5A
2A
12
2B
1B
1A
6
11 15
16
13
71.
0
'
RA
I
L
R
A
O
D
R.
O
.
W
.
FUTURE CONNECTION
FUTURE CONNECTION
4
5B
14
FUTURE CONNECTION
AREA 'A'
+/- 5.30 AC
AREA 'B'
+/- 6.00 AC
AREA 'D'
+/- 2.18 AC
AREA 'C'
+/- 9.70 AC
AREA 'E'
+/- 6.00 AC
AREA 'G'
+/- 7.50 AC AREA 'F'
+/- 2.25 AC
DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION
71.81 ACRES (+/- 3,127,825.80 SQFT)
07903101, 07903102, 07903103, 07903104, 07903105,
07903106
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (I-2)
UPTOWN MIXED USE DISTRICT-OPTIONAL
(UMUD-O)
WAREHOUSE, VACANT
INDUSTRIAL, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL, RESTAURANT,
RETAIL, OFFICE, HOTEL, AND MULTIFAMILY. REFER
ALSO TO DEVELOPMENT NOTES FOR ADDITIONAL
USE INFORMATION.
PER THE ORDINANCE
(REFER TO DEVELOPMENT NOTES )
SITE AREA
TAX PARCEL(S) INCLUDED WITHIN
THE AREA TO BE REZONED
EXISTING ZONING
PROPOSED ZONING
EXISTING USES
PROPOSED USES
PARKING
AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE
DEVELOPMENT DATA TABLE
EXISTING / POTENTIAL USE
INDUSTRIAL
EATING / DINING
RETAIL
OFFICE
MULTI-FAMILY
TOTAL
TOTAL FUTURE
BUILD OUT
100,000 SF
80,000 SF
200,000 SF
1,500,000 SF
1,500 DU
EXISTING
1,240,000 SF
1,300,000 SF 1,880,000 SF
POTENTIAL MULTIMODAL
CONNECTIONS (WOONERF)
PUBLIC ROW
(REFER TO ROW FOR
PUBLIC STREET SECTIONS)
POTENTIAL
VEHICULAR ACCESS
EXISTING
SIGNAL
POTENTIAL PRIVATE STREETS
(WITH PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT)
POTENTIAL PARKING FIELD
CONNECTIONS / DRIVEWAYS
EXISTING VEHICULAR
ACCESS (DRIVEWAYS)
P
URBAN OPEN SPACE
EXISTING SURFACE
PARKING FIELD
POTENTIAL PARALLEL
ON-STREET PARKING
PROPOSED FUTURE
PUBLIC ROW
PROPOSED ANGLED OR
HEAD-IN ON-STREET PARKING
13
FUTURE BUILDING
ENVELOPES
REVISIONS:DATE:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
Q.C. BY:
SHEET #:
SCALE:
PROJECT #:
CAMP NORTH END | REZONING
MIXED USE + INDUSTRIAL REHAB DEVELOPMENT
ATCO PROPERTIES & MANAGEMENT
27 FEBRUARY 2017
1016320 PETITION NO. 2017-xxx

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. www.LandDesign.com
V: 704.333.0325 F: 704.332.3246
223 N Graham Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
NC Engineering Firm License # C-0658
0'50'50' 100'200'
TECHNICAL DATA SHEET - FUTURE BUILD OUT
AS SHOWN

RZ-02
POTENTIAL FUTURE
BUILDING DEMO / SITE
REDEVELOPMENT
POTENTIAL FUTURE
BUILDING DEMO / SITE
REDEVELOPMENT
POTENTIAL FUTURE
BUILDING DEMO / SITE
REDEVELOPMENT
POTENTIAL FUTURE
BUILDING DEMO / SITE
REDEVELOPMENT
POTENTIAL FUTURE
BUILDING DEMO / SITE
ACCESS POINT
POTENTIAL FUTURE
BUILDING DEMO / SITE
REDEVELOPMENT
NOTES:
1. THE PLAN SHOWN IS INTENDED TO BE REVIEWED IN COLOR.
2. THE PLAN AND IMAGES SHOWN ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE FOR THE PURPOSES OF
REZONING. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. ACTUAL CONDITIONS SHOULD BE FIELD VARIFIED.
3. REFER TO SECTIONS AND NOTES FOR PRIVATE STREET SETBACK AND ROW
INFORMATION.
8'-0"
SIDEWALK
38'-0"
BACK-OF-CURB
5'-0"
BIKE LANE
22'-0"
DRIVE LANE
5'-0"
BIKE
LANE
11'-0"
DRIVE LANE
10'-0"
TURN LANE
8'-0"
SIDEWALK
5'-0"
BIKE
LANE
11'-0"
DRIVE LANE
72'-0"
PARKING LOT
6'-0"
SIDEWALK
47'-0"
BACK-OF-CURB
70'-0"
BACK-OF-SIDEWALK
21'-0"
PLANTING STRIP
EX. 5'-0"
SIDEWALK
EX. 6'-0"
PLANTING
STRIP
4'-0"
PLANTING
STRIP
60'-0"
PARKING
8'-0"
SIDEWALK
37'-0"
BACK-OF-CURB
63'-0"
BACK-OF-SIDEWALK
4'-0"
SIDEWALK PROPOSED THOROUGHFARE R.O.W.+/- 11'-0"
SLOPE OR WALL
CONDITION
EXISTING FENCE
EXISTING
POWER POLE
EXISTING FENCE
6'-0"
SIDEWALK
4'-0"
PLANTING
STRIP
4'-0"
PLANTING
STRIP
6'-0"
PLANT
STRIP
RELOCATED
POWER POLE
EXISTING
POWER POLE
EXISTING
POWER POLE
33'-0"
DRIVE LANE
TREE IN PARKING
ISLAND BEYOND
EX. 5'-0"
SIDEWALK
EX. 6'-0"
PLANTING
STRIPEXISTING R.O.W.EXISTING R.O.W.9'-6"
9'-6"PROPOSED THOROUGHFARE R.O.W.POTENTIAL R.O.W. - NEED TO CONFIRMEXISTING R.O.W.25'-0"25'-0"
8'-0"
PLANTING
STRIP PROPOSED FUTURE R.O.W.16' SETBACK LINE16' SETBACK LINEEXISTING CENTERLINEPROPOSED R.O.W.30'-6"37'-6"EXISTING CENTERLINEHOLD EX.B.O.C.EXISTING CENTER LINEHOLD EX.B.O.C.EXISTING CENTERLINEPROPOSED CENTERLINE11'-0"
DRIVE LANE
11'-0"
DRIVE LANE
5'-0"
BIKE LANEPROPOSED CENTERLINE41'-0"
BACK-OF-CURB
63'-0"
BACK-OF-SIDEWALK
36'-0"
DRIVE LANE
HOLD EX.B.O.C.HOLD EX.B.O.C.2'-0"
3'-0"0' SETBACK FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT0' SETBACK FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENTSTATESVILLE AVE.STATESVILLE AVE.WOODWARD AVE
VA
ND
ER
B
I
L
T

RO
AD EDISON
ST
.LUCENA ST.N. GRAHAM ST.N. GRAHAM ST.W. 24TH ST.
WOL
F
B
E
R
R
Y

S
T
.
SYLVA
N
I
A

A
V
E
.
OAKLAWN
AVE.
KESWI
C
K

A
V
E
.
EXISTING BUILDINGTO REMAIN
Tax # 079-021-011516 Statesville Ave. LLCDB 14097 Pg 760Zoning: I-2
Tax # 079-021-11 Cityof Charlotte DB 27969Pg 247 Zoning: I-2 Mecklenburg CountyABC BoardTax # 079-021-08DB 4244 Pg 827Zoning: I-2
Tax # 079-021-09Emphasis Ads, Inc. DB25397 Pg 417 Zoning: I-2
THERESA LUSKTax # 07901104Zoning: I-2
HAWTHORNE CAPITAL LLCTax # 007910306Zoning: I-2
HAWTHORNE CAPITAL, LLCTax # 07910305Zoning: I-2
BANCROFT KESWICK LLCTax # 07910304Zoning: I-2
BANCROFT KESWICK LLCTax # 07910303Zoning: I-2
KENNETH W HILLESTHELA HILLTax # 07910204Zoning: I-2
KENNETH W HILLESTHELA HILLTax # 07910203Zoning: I-2
DAVID W ALLENTax # 007910202Zoning: I-2
HUGHES BUILDING MATERIALS LTDTax # 07910102Zoning: I-2
VISION VENTURES OF CAROLINA LLCTED HILL AND ASSOCIATES LLCKATHLEEN EGAN MCALLISTERREVOCABLE TRUSTTax # 07910101Zoning: I-2
JEREMY ZHENGTax # 07909901Zoning: I-2
ESEL JAY OHHANNAH OHTax # 07906104Zoning: I-2
TRYON IMPORTS INCTax # 07906103Zoning: I-2
A-1 DISTRIBUTING CO LLCTax # 07906554Zoning: I-1AUDWIN L ROSSTax # 07904123Zoning: I-1BOBBY LEE REITZELTax # 07904122Zoning: I-2METALS FREEDOM INCTax # 07904201Zoning: I-2AUTO HARDWARETax # 07904202Zoning: I-2BY ENTIRETYRAY E HALLTax 07904203Zoning: I-2TPM PROPERTIES LIMITEDPARTNERSHIPTax # 07904204Zoning: MUDD-OMecklenburg CountyABC BoardTax # 079-021-08DB 4244 Pg 827Zoning: I-2MECKLENBURG COUNTYC/O REAL ESTATE /FINANCE DEPTTax # 07904303Zoning: NS01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
REVISIONS:DATE:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
Q.C. BY:
SHEET #:
SCALE:
PROJECT #:
CAMP NORTH END | REZONING
MIXED USE + INDUSTRIAL REHAB DEVELOPMENT
ATCO PROPERTIES & MANAGEMENT
27 FEBRUARY 2017
1016320 PETITION NO. 2017-xxx

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. www.LandDesign.com
V: 704.333.0325 F: 704.332.3246
223 N Graham Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
NC Engineering Firm License # C-0658
STATESVILLE AVENUE - EXISTING CONDITION
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
STATESVILLE AVENUE - PROPOSED CONDITION
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
WOODWARD AVENUE - EXISTING CONDITION
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
WOODWARD AVENUE - PROPOSED CONDITION
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
STREET SECTIONS
AS SHOWN

RZ-03
WOODWAR
D
STATESVILLE
41'-0"
BACK-OF-CURB
EXISTING
POWER POLE
4'-0"
SIDEWALK
3'-0"
PLANTING
STRIP
EXISTING
POWER / LIGHT POLE
40'-0"
DRIVE LANEEXISTING CENTERLINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEEXISTING FENCE
1'-6"
PLANTING
STRIP
VARIES
PRIVATE LOADING ZONE
VARIES
LANDSCAPE AREA APPROXIMATE EXISTING R.O.W.PROPOSED R.O.W.10' SIDE SETBACKBURIED GUTTER PAN
EXISTING CONDITION
43'-0"
BACK-OF-CURB
8'-0"
SIDEWALK
6'-0"
PLANTING
STRIP
RELOCATED
POWER / LIGHT POLE
EXISTING CENTERLINEEXISTING PROPERTY LINEVARIES
PLANTING
STRIP
22'-0"
TRAVEL LANE
LANDSCAPE AREA -
WIDTH VARIES 10' SIDE SETBACK18'-6"
PARKING PROPOSED R.O.W.NEW 2' CURB
AND GUTTER
EXISTING BOC IS
NEW EOP
40'-0"
DRIVE LANE
BURIED CURB
AND GUTTER
TO REMAIN
BEGIN IMPROVEMENTS
FROM CL
EXISTING
POWER POLE
EXISTING CONDITIONAPPROXIMATE EXISTING R.O.W.STATESVILLE AVE.STATESVILLE AVE.WOODWARD AVE
VA
ND
ER
B
I
L
T

RO
AD EDISON
ST
.LUCENA ST.N. GRAHAM ST.N. GRAHAM ST.W. 24TH ST.
WOL
F
B
E
R
R
Y

S
T
.
SYLVA
N
I
A

A
V
E
.
OAKLAWN
AVE.
KESWI
C
K

A
V
E
.
EXISTING BUILDINGTO REMAIN
Tax # 079-021-011516 Statesville Ave. LLCDB 14097 Pg 760Zoning: I-2
Tax # 079-021-11 Cityof Charlotte DB 27969Pg 247 Zoning: I-2 Mecklenburg CountyABC BoardTax # 079-021-08DB 4244 Pg 827Zoning: I-2
Tax # 079-021-09Emphasis Ads, Inc. DB25397 Pg 417 Zoning: I-2
THERESA LUSKTax # 07901104Zoning: I-2
HAWTHORNE CAPITAL LLCTax # 007910306Zoning: I-2
HAWTHORNE CAPITAL, LLCTax # 07910305Zoning: I-2
BANCROFT KESWICK LLCTax # 07910304Zoning: I-2
BANCROFT KESWICK LLCTax # 07910303Zoning: I-2
KENNETH W HILLESTHELA HILLTax # 07910204Zoning: I-2
KENNETH W HILLESTHELA HILLTax # 07910203Zoning: I-2
DAVID W ALLENTax # 007910202Zoning: I-2
HUGHES BUILDING MATERIALS LTDTax # 07910102Zoning: I-2
VISION VENTURES OF CAROLINA LLCTED HILL AND ASSOCIATES LLCKATHLEEN EGAN MCALLISTERREVOCABLE TRUSTTax # 07910101Zoning: I-2
JEREMY ZHENGTax # 07909901Zoning: I-2
ESEL JAY OHHANNAH OHTax # 07906104Zoning: I-2
TRYON IMPORTS INCTax # 07906103Zoning: I-2
A-1 DISTRIBUTING CO LLCTax # 07906554Zoning: I-1AUDWIN L ROSSTax # 07904123Zoning: I-1BOBBY LEE REITZELTax # 07904122Zoning: I-2METALS FREEDOM INCTax # 07904201Zoning: I-2AUTO HARDWARETax # 07904202Zoning: I-2BY ENTIRETYRAY E HALLTax 07904203Zoning: I-2TPM PROPERTIES LIMITEDPARTNERSHIPTax # 07904204Zoning: MUDD-OMecklenburg CountyABC BoardTax # 079-021-08DB 4244 Pg 827Zoning: I-2MECKLENBURG COUNTYC/O REAL ESTATE /FINANCE DEPTTax # 07904303Zoning: NS01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
REVISIONS:DATE:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
Q.C. BY:
SHEET #:
SCALE:
PROJECT #:
CAMP NORTH END | REZONING
MIXED USE + INDUSTRIAL REHAB DEVELOPMENT
ATCO PROPERTIES & MANAGEMENT
27 FEBRUARY 2017
1016320 PETITION NO. 2017-xxx

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. www.LandDesign.com
V: 704.333.0325 F: 704.332.3246
223 N Graham Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
NC Engineering Firm License # C-0658
GRAHAM STREET - EXISTING CONDITION
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
GRAHAM STREET - PROPOSED CONDITION
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
STREET SECTIONS
AS SHOWN

RZ-04 GRAHAM
STATESVILLE AVE.STATESVILLE AVE.WOODWARD AVE
VA
ND
ER
B
I
L
T

RO
AD EDISON
ST
.LUCENA ST.N. GRAHAM ST.N. GRAHAM ST.W. 24TH ST.
WOL
F
B
E
R
R
Y

S
T
.
SYLVA
N
I
A

A
V
E
.
OAKLAWN
AVE.
KESWI
C
K

A
V
E
.
EXISTING BUILDINGTO REMAIN
Tax # 079-021-011516 Statesville Ave. LLCDB 14097 Pg 760Zoning: I-2
Tax # 079-021-11 Cityof Charlotte DB 27969Pg 247 Zoning: I-2 Mecklenburg CountyABC BoardTax # 079-021-08DB 4244 Pg 827Zoning: I-2
Tax # 079-021-09Emphasis Ads, Inc. DB25397 Pg 417 Zoning: I-2
THERESA LUSKTax # 07901104Zoning: I-2
HAWTHORNE CAPITAL LLCTax # 007910306Zoning: I-2
HAWTHORNE CAPITAL, LLCTax # 07910305Zoning: I-2
BANCROFT KESWICK LLCTax # 07910304Zoning: I-2
BANCROFT KESWICK LLCTax # 07910303Zoning: I-2
KENNETH W HILLESTHELA HILLTax # 07910204Zoning: I-2
KENNETH W HILLESTHELA HILLTax # 07910203Zoning: I-2
DAVID W ALLENTax # 007910202Zoning: I-2
HUGHES BUILDING MATERIALS LTDTax # 07910102Zoning: I-2
VISION VENTURES OF CAROLINA LLCTED HILL AND ASSOCIATES LLCKATHLEEN EGAN MCALLISTERREVOCABLE TRUSTTax # 07910101Zoning: I-2
JEREMY ZHENGTax # 07909901Zoning: I-2
ESEL JAY OHHANNAH OHTax # 07906104Zoning: I-2
TRYON IMPORTS INCTax # 07906103Zoning: I-2
A-1 DISTRIBUTING CO LLCTax # 07906554Zoning: I-1AUDWIN L ROSSTax # 07904123Zoning: I-1BOBBY LEE REITZELTax # 07904122Zoning: I-2METALS FREEDOM INCTax # 07904201Zoning: I-2AUTO HARDWARETax # 07904202Zoning: I-2BY ENTIRETYRAY E HALLTax 07904203Zoning: I-2TPM PROPERTIES LIMITEDPARTNERSHIPTax # 07904204Zoning: MUDD-OMecklenburg CountyABC BoardTax # 079-021-08DB 4244 Pg 827Zoning: I-2MECKLENBURG COUNTYC/O REAL ESTATE /FINANCE DEPTTax # 07904303Zoning: NS01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
REVISIONS:DATE:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
Q.C. BY:
SHEET #:
SCALE:
PROJECT #:
CAMP NORTH END | REZONING
MIXED USE + INDUSTRIAL REHAB DEVELOPMENT
ATCO PROPERTIES & MANAGEMENT
27 FEBRUARY 2017
1016320 PETITION NO. 2017-xxx

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. www.LandDesign.com
V: 704.333.0325 F: 704.332.3246
223 N Graham Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
NC Engineering Firm License # C-0658
STREET SECTIONS
AS SHOWN

RZ-05
CAMP STREET - SECTION A
CAMP STREET - SECTION B
CAMP STREET - SECTION C
CAMP STREET - SECTION D
CAMP STREET - SECTION E
CAMP STREET - SECTION F AABBCCDDEEFFGHHGIIJJKKLLCAMP STREET
CA
M
P
ST
R
E
E
T
STATESVILLE AVE.STATESVILLE AVE.WOODWARD AVE
VA
ND
ER
B
I
L
T

RO
AD EDISON
ST
.LUCENA ST.N. GRAHAM ST.N. GRAHAM ST.W. 24TH ST.
WOL
F
B
E
R
R
Y

S
T
.
SYLVA
N
I
A

A
V
E
.
OAKLAWN
AVE.
KESWI
C
K

A
V
E
.
EXISTING BUILDINGTO REMAIN
Tax # 079-021-011516 Statesville Ave. LLCDB 14097 Pg 760Zoning: I-2
Tax # 079-021-11 Cityof Charlotte DB 27969Pg 247 Zoning: I-2 Mecklenburg CountyABC BoardTax # 079-021-08DB 4244 Pg 827Zoning: I-2
Tax # 079-021-09Emphasis Ads, Inc. DB25397 Pg 417 Zoning: I-2
THERESA LUSKTax # 07901104Zoning: I-2
HAWTHORNE CAPITAL LLCTax # 007910306Zoning: I-2
HAWTHORNE CAPITAL, LLCTax # 07910305Zoning: I-2
BANCROFT KESWICK LLCTax # 07910304Zoning: I-2
BANCROFT KESWICK LLCTax # 07910303Zoning: I-2
KENNETH W HILLESTHELA HILLTax # 07910204Zoning: I-2
KENNETH W HILLESTHELA HILLTax # 07910203Zoning: I-2
DAVID W ALLENTax # 007910202Zoning: I-2
HUGHES BUILDING MATERIALS LTDTax # 07910102Zoning: I-2
VISION VENTURES OF CAROLINA LLCTED HILL AND ASSOCIATES LLCKATHLEEN EGAN MCALLISTERREVOCABLE TRUSTTax # 07910101Zoning: I-2
JEREMY ZHENGTax # 07909901Zoning: I-2
ESEL JAY OHHANNAH OHTax # 07906104Zoning: I-2
TRYON IMPORTS INCTax # 07906103Zoning: I-2
A-1 DISTRIBUTING CO LLCTax # 07906554Zoning: I-1AUDWIN L ROSSTax # 07904123Zoning: I-1BOBBY LEE REITZELTax # 07904122Zoning: I-2METALS FREEDOM INCTax # 07904201Zoning: I-2AUTO HARDWARETax # 07904202Zoning: I-2BY ENTIRETYRAY E HALLTax 07904203Zoning: I-2TPM PROPERTIES LIMITEDPARTNERSHIPTax # 07904204Zoning: MUDD-OMecklenburg CountyABC BoardTax # 079-021-08DB 4244 Pg 827Zoning: I-2MECKLENBURG COUNTYC/O REAL ESTATE /FINANCE DEPTTax # 07904303Zoning: NS01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
REVISIONS:DATE:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
Q.C. BY:
SHEET #:
SCALE:
PROJECT #:
CAMP NORTH END | REZONING
MIXED USE + INDUSTRIAL REHAB DEVELOPMENT
ATCO PROPERTIES & MANAGEMENT
27 FEBRUARY 2017
1016320 PETITION NO. 2017-xxx

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. www.LandDesign.com
V: 704.333.0325 F: 704.332.3246
223 N Graham Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
NC Engineering Firm License # C-0658
STREET SECTIONS
AS SHOWN

RZ-05
CAMP STREET - SECTION G
CAMP STREET - SECTION H
CAMP STREET - SECTION I
CAMP STREET - SECTION J
AABBCCDDEEFFGHHGIIJJKKLLCAMP STREET
CA
M
P
ST
R
E
E
T
CAMP STREET - SECTION K
CAMP STREET - SECTION L
ATCO/CAMP NORTH END
Development Standards
Preliminary Draft: 2/18/17
Rezoning Petition No. 2017-000
Site Development Data:
--Acreage: ±[72 acres]
--Tax Parcel #s: 07903101, 07903102, 07903103, 07903104, 07903105, and 07903106
--Existing Zoning: I-2
--Proposed Zoning: UMUD-O
--Existing Uses: Vacant, Industrial, Warehouse and Office
--Proposed Uses: Uses permitted by right and under prescribed conditions in UMUD zoning district and by the Optional
Provisions below, together with accessory uses as allowed in the UMUD zoning district, all as more specifically
described and limited/restricted below in Section 3.
--Maximum Gross Square feet of Development: See with respect to the Development Levels as described in Section 3 below.
-- Maximum Building Height: 180 feet in height as to portions of the Site as described in the Optional Provisions of
Section 2, and otherwise up to [70] feet in height above existing ground floor slab for existing buildings; building
height for new buildings will be measured as defined in the Ordinance.
-- Parking: As required by the Ordinance for the UMUD zoning district
1.General Provisions:
a.Site Location. These Development Standards, the Technical Data Sheet of Sheet RZ-1 and other graphics set forth on
attached Sheets form this rezoning plan (collectively referred to as the “Rezoning Plan”) associated with the Rezoning Petition
filed by ATCO (“Petitioner”) for an approximately [71] acre site located between Statesville Avenue and Graham Street south of
Woodward Avenue (the “Site”).
b.Overview/Nature of Redevelopment. Redevelopment of the Site as contemplated by the Rezoning Plan involves an
innovative, adaptive reuse of significant portions of the existing industrial/distribution buildings that were constructed as early as
the 1920s. The redevelopment to be known as “Camp North End” seeks to resurrect and continue the legacy of innovation of this
unique property by transforming the historical industrial distribution components into a vibrant destination and vehicle for
economic mobility. The Rezoning Plan contemplates a dynamic mix of retail, food and beverage, creative office, craft/light
industrial production, creative lab, community programming, film studios, entertainment venues, educational uses and other
commercial and light industrial related uses, and possible lodging and multi-family residential uses - many of which will occupy
in an adaptive reuse format the existing unique industrial period buildings and some will occupy new buildings located in certain
designated areas on the Site. The Rezoning Plan reflects the need for creativity and flexibility in compliance with land use
regulations by way of UMUD Optional Provisions and other regulatory allowances in order to create the innovative and unique
place sought for the City's Applied Innovation Corridor, among other community planning instruments.
c.Zoning District/Ordinance. Development of the Site will be governed by the Rezoning Plan as well as the applicable
provisions of the City of Charlotte Zoning Ordinance (the “Ordinance”) for the UMUD-O zoning district. Unless the Rezoning
Plan establishes more stringent standards the regulations established under the Ordinance, the UMUDD-O zoning classification
shall govern the Site, subject to the Optional Provisions set forth below.
[d. Development within Existing & New Buildings. It is acknowledged that the existing buildings located on the Site as
generally depicted and identified on [Sheet RZ-00 and Sheet RZ-01] of the Rezoning Plan (each an “Existing Building” and
collectively the “Existing Buildings”) consist of ±[1.24] million square feet of space and in the recent past over 90% of such
Existing Building space has been used for a combination of distribution, light industrial and office related uses. Given the size
and scale of the Site, portions of the Site and the Existing Buildings will be developed in a combined effort to meet and create
market demand with a mix of small or larger rehabs of portions of Existing Buildings for the permitted uses as well as
development of new buildings on the Site (each a “New Building” and collectively the “New Buildings”) that will occur in areas
currently consisting of surface parking or driveway areas or portions of Existing Buildings as generally depicted within the
“yellow shaded areas” (as such areas may be adjusted) on [Sheet RZ-02]. The provisions of Section 3.d. below reflect the
above-described approach to construction of New Buildings on portions of the Site and redevelopment with Adaptive Reuses of
portions of the Existing Buildings.
e. Graphics and Alterations. The schematic depictions of the uses, parking areas, sidewalks, structures and buildings
(including without limitation Existing Buildings or New Buildings;together “buildings”), driveways, and other development
matters and site elements (collectively the “Development/Site Elements”) as may be set forth on the Rezoning Plan should be
reviewed in conjunction with the provisions of these Development Standards. The layout, locations, sizes and formulations of
the Development/Site Elements depicted on the Rezoning Plan are graphic representations of the Development/Site elements
proposed. Changes to the Rezoning Plan not anticipated by the Rezoning Plan will be reviewed and approved as allowed by
Section 6.207 of the Ordinance. Since the project has not undergone the design development and construction phases, it is
intended that this Rezoning Plan provide for flexibility in allowing some alterations or modifications from the graphic
representations of the Development/Site Elements. Therefore, there may be instances where minor modifications will be allowed
without requiring the Administrative Amendment Process per Section 6.207 of the Ordinance. These instances would include
changes to graphics if they are:
(i) expressly permitted by the Rezoning Plan (it is understood that if a modification is expressly permitted by the
Rezoning Plan it is deemed a minor modification for the purposes of these Development Standards); or
(ii) minor and don't materially change the overall design intent depicted on the Rezoning Plan; or
(iii) modifications to move structures or buildings graphically depicted on the Rezoning Plan closer to adjacent
properties but no closer than the “external building line” (in this case the yards) indicated on the Rezoning Plan; or
(iv) modifications to allow minor increases in the mass of the buildings that do not materially change the design intent
depicted on or described in the Rezoning Plan.
The Planning Director will determine if such minor modifications are allowed per this amended process, and if it is determined
that the alteration does not meet the criteria described above, the Petitioner shall then follow the Administrative Amendment
Process per Section 6.207 of the Ordinance; in each instance, however, subject to the Petitioner's appeal rights set forth in the
Ordinance.
f. Number of Buildings Principal and Accessory. Given the phased master planned nature of the Site, Petitioner is not
required to set forth the number of the buildings and structures on the Site, and the total number of such buildings or structures to
be developed on the Site shall not be limited.
g. Planned/Unified Development. The Site and Development Areas within the Site shall be viewed as a planned/unified
development plan as to the elements and portions of the Site generally depicted on the Rezoning Plan for the Site and such
Development Areas. As such, side and rear yards, buffers, building height separation standards, FAR requirements, and other
similar zoning standards will not be required internally between improvements and other Development/Site Elements located
within the Site or an applicable Development Area. Furthermore, the Petitioner and/or owner of any portion of the Site reserves
the right to subdivide portions or all of the Site and create lots within the interior of the portion of the Site or within a
Development Area without regard to any such internal separation standards and FAR requirements, provided, however, all such
separation standards along the exterior boundary of the Site shall be adhered to. In addition, all FAR requirements will be
regulated by any development limitations set forth in this Rezoning Plan for the Plan Site as a whole and not individual portions,
Development Areas or lots located therein
h. Five Year Vested Rights. Per Section 1.110 of the Ordinance and N.C.G.S. Section 160A-385.1, due to the scale, size
and master planned nature of the development & its timing, and the level of investment, among other factors, this Petition
includes vesting of the Rezoning Plan and conditional zoning districts for a five (5) year period, but such provisions shall not
limit any other vested rights at common law or otherwise
i. Definitions & Clarifications. In addition to certain defined terms set forth in the Development Standards, the following
apply to certain definitions:
(i)Gross Floor Area Clarification. When determining the maximum development levels set forth in this Rezoning Plan,
the term gross floor shall exclude mechanical spaces, crawl spaces, elevator shafts and similar areas as well as any
surface or structured parking facilities (including, without limitation, corridors and elevators within such facilities),
enclosed loading dock/service areas, and outdoor dining and gathering areas whether on the roof of the building or at
street level.
(ii)Personal Services. The terms “personal service uses” and/or “personal services” (whether capitalized or not) will
mean and refer to uses that primarily provide or sell a service to customers versus the selling of goods. A personal
service use may also sell products or merchandised but the sale of products and merchandise is typically ancillary.
Examples of Personal Service uses include but are not limited to: beauty salons and barber shops, artist studios and
galleries, Yoga and exercise studios, fitness and wellness facilities, nail salons, martial art training studios, laundries
and dry cleaning establishments, locksmiths, funeral homes and the like.
(iii)Limited Service Restaurant. A “Limited Service Restaurant” or “limited service restaurant” (whether capitalized or
not) shall mean a restaurant with no more than 3,000 square feet of gross floor area serving primarily items such as
coffee, ice cream, yogurt, juices, bagels, muffins, pastries, sandwiches and similar foods that do not require
on-premise cooking of food (other than heating and the baking of premixed dough).
(iv)Open Space. References to the term “open space” or “Open Space” (whether capitalized or not) shall have the
meaning ascribed to such term in the Ordinance but for further clarification shall include gathering places, plazas, tree
save areas, storm water quality features and other similar open and unobstructed areas.
(v)EDEE Uses. References to the term “EDEE” shall mean “Eating Drinking Entertainment Establishments” as defined
in the Ordinance and shall include without limitation restaurants and multi-room drinking establishments.
(vi)Commercial Uses. References to the term “commercial uses” or “Commercial Uses” (whether capitalized or not)
shall mean office uses, retail uses, EDEE uses and personal services uses, and the term “non-office commercial uses”
or “Non-office Commercial Uses”) (whether capitalized or not) shall mean retail uses, EDEE uses and personal
services uses.
(vii)Light Industrial Uses. References to the term “Light Industrial Uses” or “light industrial uses” (whether capitalized
or not) shall mean all such uses permitted by right or under prescribed conditions under the UMUD zoning district
other than the Commercial Uses, hotel/lodging uses and multi-family residential uses.
(viii)[Adaptive Reuse. [NOTE TO TEAM: see revised definition that dovetails renovations and other items] Reference
to the term “Adaptive Reuse” (whether capitalized or not) is intended to describe reuse of as much of an Existing
Building as practical and as permitted by applicable building regulation codes. The reuse will marry the spirit of the
original architecture with anticipated sympathetic architectural intervention such as, but not limited to renovations,
repairs, upgrades to mechanical systems and otherwise, portal demolitions, minor expansions, and establishment of
passageways, patios, entries, connectivity, new fenestration, façade treatments, roof replacement and removal.]
(ix)Active Ground Floor Use. Reference to the term “Active Ground Floor Use” (whether capitalized or not) shall mean
retail, Personal Services, business services, EDEE, galleries, office, lobbies, meeting areas, instructional venues,
financial services, hotel lobby, leasing offices, lounges, exercise facilities, amenity areas and/or similar uses.
2.Optional Provisions under UMUD:
a. Intent/Context. The Site is part of the Center City 2020 Vision Plan, Innovation Corridor and Smart District planning
areas that place an emphasis on adaptive reuse, innovative development and maintaining space and opportunities for industrial
uses that can be integrated into the area with residential, Commercial Uses and Light Industrial Uses. As noted in Section 1.b
above, the intent of Camp North End is to maintain much of the unique character and innovative nature associated with many of
the existing Development/Site Elements. This will require flexibility in the application of and variations from certain UMUD
standards to preserve portions of the existing Development/Site Elements while incorporating New Buildings and connectivity
throughout the Site.
b. Specific Identified Optional Provisions. While UMUD provides many exemptions for the Existing Buildings and does
not require renovated or rehabilitated structures to comply with the setback requirements or urban open space, the following
UMUD-Optional Provisions (the “Optional Provisions” or “optional provisions”) shall apply to existing and new development
taking place on the Site.
3.Permitted Uses; Development Levels; Conversion Rights.
a. Permitted Uses Generally. The Site may be developed with uses permitted by right and under prescribed conditions in
the UMUD zoning district together with accessory uses as allowed in the UMUD zoning district, in accordance with the Optional
Provisions set forth above AND EXCEPT as noted below in Sections 3.b., 3.c., 3.d. and 3.e.
b. Permitted Uses Under Prescribed Conditions. The following principle uses are permitted as described below and under
the prescribed conditions for such uses that are set forth in the Ordinance.
(i) Retail sales for automobiles (new and used), feed, fences and fence materials, packaged fertilizer, motorcycles,
pawnshops and trucks within a completely enclosed building limited to Development Areas A, B, and C as generally
depicted on RZ-02.
(ii) Exterminators, funeral homes and embalming, laundries and dry cleaning establishments and locksmiths and
gunsmiths limited to Development Areas A, B, and C as generally depicted on RZ-02.
(iii) Utility and related facilities such as distribution lines, railroad rights-of-way, telephone repeater stations, and water
storage tanks if currently or previously existing on the site and with expansion
(iv) Drive-in windows as part of an accessory part of a principal structure designed to be completely internal to the
building.
(v) Outdoor sales accessory, subject to the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance Section 12.417 limited to
Development Areas A, B, and C as generally depicted on RZ-02.
(vi) Beneficial fill permitted from within the overall Site and as associated with Brownfield restoration and related
regulations.
c. Prohibited Uses. The following uses are not permitted: animal crematoriums, jails, land clearing and inert debris
landfills, crematory facilities, and/or petroleum storage.
d. New Building Areas. [Sheet RZ-02] generally depicts those portions of the Site shaded in yellow in which New
Buildings and associated development are contemplated (the “New Building Development Areas”). Development within the
New Building Development Areas may include demolition of all or portions of the Existing Buildings. The boundary of the New
Building Development Areas may be adjusted in a manner so as to result in a comparable amount of Existing Buildings within
the New Building Development Areas upon such adjustment; provided, further, that at least 400,000 square feet of gross floor
area within Existing Buildings shall remain on the Site (subject to fire, casualty or similar events). It is expressly understood that
the portions of the Site not identified as New Building Development Areas, as the same may be adjusted, may be redeveloped as
Adaptive Reuses (as defined above). ]
e.Development Levels. [NOTE TO TEAM: see Table 3.e. below for Development Levels using the DRG traffic study
amounts] Development levels for certain permitted uses are set forth in Table 3.e. below for the purposes of regulating
traffic/transportation related aspects that may result from development taking place on the Site as more particularly set forth in
Section 4 below. When referencing development levels in Table 3.e. below, it is understood that those permitted uses falling
within the category of uses listed below shall be accounted for within the listing for Light Industrial uses. It is acknowledged that
the actual development levels allowed may be increased or decreased above or below the development levels reflected in Table
3.e. below in accordance with the conversion rights set forth in Sections 3.f. - 3.i. below up to the maximum conversion amounts
set forth in such sections.
* Light Industrial Uses under Phases 1, 2 and 3 include uses that are not accounted for under the other listed uses listed.
** EDEE includes drinking establishments. ***Hospitality/hotel uses allowed per conversion rights.
f. Conversion of Commercial Uses. Retail, EDEE, and Personal Services uses (“non-office commercial uses”) may
exceed the applicable development levels set forth in Section d. above by up to 40% and office commercial uses may exceed the
applicable development level specifications by up to 40% by converting non-office commercial uses into office commercial uses
and vice versa at a ratio of 1.0 square foot of gross floor area of such uses so converted. In such event the total gross floor area of
commercial uses (office and non-office) allowed shall not exceed the total specified amount as a result of such conversions,
rather only the mix of such uses shall change but not by greater than 40%. The conversions described above are in addition to
other conversions set forth herein and include both the conversions properly exercised and those remaining shall be set forth as
part of the Conversions Levels on the Entitlement Summary and related Chart described on [Sheet RZ-___]. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the limit on conversion of the above commercial uses that consist of high turnover restaurant uses shall be up to an
increase of no greater than 25% of such high turnover restaurant uses, not 40% as described above.
g. Conversion of Hotel Rooms & Residential Units. [NOTE TO TEAM: base uses set out in Traffic assessments did
not include hotel rooms so following creates hotel rooms by converting residential units - see also conversion rights in h.
below; can discuss if we need to add some level of hotel rooms at outset by adjusting DRG traffic grids by adding those
uses or just rely on conversions.] Hotel rooms may be developed within the Site by converting residential dwelling units into
hotel rooms at the rate of one (1) residential unit so converted into one (1) hotel room, up to a maximum of 300 hotel rooms
created in the aggregate within the Site by such conversion. The conversions described above are in addition to other
conversions set forth herein and include both the conversions properly exercised and those remaining shall be set forth as part of
the Conversions Levels on the Entitlement Summary and related Chart described on [Sheet RZ- ].
h. Conversion of Hotel Rooms, Multifamily Units & Commercial Uses. Hotel rooms and additional multifamily
residential units may be developed within the Site by converting commercial uses (e.g. office, retail, EDEE and Personal Services
uses) into hotel rooms or multifamily units at the rate of 500 square feet of gross floor area of such commercial uses so converted
for one (1) hotel room added or one (1) multifamily unit so added, up to a maximum of 300 hotel rooms and/or multifamily units
created in the aggregate by such conversion, and additional commercial uses may be developed by converting hotel rooms or
multifamily units into commercial uses at the rate of one (1) hotel room or one (1) multifamily unit so added so converted into
500 square feet of gross floor area of commercial uses so created up to a maximum of 300 hotel rooms or multifamily units so
converted in the aggregate. The conversions described above are in addition to other conversions set forth herein and include
both the conversions properly exercised and those remaining shall be set forth as part of the Conversions Levels on the
Entitlement Summary and related Chart described on [Sheet RZ-___].
i. Conversion of Light Industrial Uses & Commercial Uses. Light Industrial uses and commercial uses (office and
non-office) may exceed the applicable development levels set forth in Section d. above by up to 40% by converting such
commercial uses into Light Industrial uses at the rate of 1.0 square foot of gross floor area of commercial use so converted to 1.5
square foot of gross floor area of Light Industrial uses created and vice-versa for the conversion of Light Industrial uses into
commercial uses. The conversions described above are in addition to other conversions set forth herein and both the conversions
properly exercised and those remaining shall be set forth as part of the Conversions Levels on the Entitlement Summary and
related Chart described on [Sheet RZ-_____]. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the limit on conversion of Light Industrial uses
into high turnover restaurant uses shall be up to an increase of no greater than 25% of such high turnover restaurant uses, not
40% as described above.
j. Written Requests & Records for Conversions; Administrative Amendments. Prior to any conversions of entitlement
pursuant to subsections 3.f, g, h and i above, the Petitioner or owner of the portion of the Site involved in the conversion under
request shall provide to the Planning Department a written request for such conversion as well as an updated Entitlement
Summary, including the applicable Conversions Levels. Furthermore, the results of such conversions shall be evidenced by an
administrative site plan amendment.
4.Transportation Improvements. [NOTE TO TEAM: the following provisions are subject to further review but reflect
CDOT's required approach to transportation matters; pending results of Traffic Impact Analysis we will likely eliminate 4.I.
below]]
I.Proposed Improvements:
The following improvements set forth below to benefit overall traffic patterns throughout the area shall be provided for in
accordance with the following implementation provisions (including Section II.a. regarding such improvements being undertaken
by other parties/developers or by governmental bodies in connection with CIP or other public improvements projects):
a. Phase I Development. Reference is made to Table 3.e. above for the designated development levels for the “Phase I
Development.” The following improvements shall be installed in connection with the Phase I Development (it is noted on [Sheet
RZ-___] that the Phase I Development excludes a portion of such development referenced as the “Excluded Phase I
Development” and accordingly no Phase I Improvements are required in connection with the Excluded Phase I Development)
[NOTE TO TEAM: it is hopeful that the Excluded Phase I Development concept will not be needed]:
b. Phase II Development. Reference is made to [Sheet RZ-___] for the designated development levels for the “Phase I
Development.” The following additional improvements beyond the Phase I Improvements shall be installed in connection with
the Phase II Development (the “Phase II Improvements”):
c. Phase III Development. Reference is made to [Sheet RZ-___] for the designated Development Levels for the “Phase III
Development.” Only the following additional improvements beyond the Phase I Improvements and Phase II Improvements shall
be installed in connection with the Phase III Development:
II.Standards, Phasing and Other Provisions.
a. CDOT Standards; Improvements by Others. All of the foregoing public roadway improvements will be subject to the
standards and criteria of CDOT (as it relates to the roadway improvements within its road system authority). It is understood that
such improvements may be undertaken by the Petitioner on its own, by other parties/developers, by governmental bodies and/or
in conjunction with other development or roadway projects taking place within the Statesville Avenue/Graham Street areas, by
way of a private/public partnership effort or other public sector project support.
[b. Additional Phasing Provisions. Notwithstanding the commitments of the Petitioner to provide for the roadway
improvements described in Section 4.I above, the following provisions shall permit development to take place prior to
completion of all of the above-referenced improvements: [TO BE FORTHCOMING UPON REVIEW OF TIA]
c.Substantial Completion. Reference to “substantial completion” for certain improvements as set forth in the provisions
of Section 4.II above shall mean completion of the roadway improvements in accordance with the standards set forth in Section
4.II.a above provided, however, in the event certain non-essential roadway improvements (as reasonably determined by CDOT)
are not completed at the time that the Petitioner seeks to obtain a certificate of occupancy for building(s) on the Site in
connection with related development phasing described above, then CDOT will instruct applicable authorities to allow the
issuance of certificates of occupancy for the applicable buildings, and in such event the Petitioner may be asked to post a letter of
credit or a bond for any improvements not in place at the time such a certificate of occupancy is issued to secure completion of
the applicable improvements.
d. Right-of-way Availability. It is understood that some of the public roadway improvements referenced in subsection a.
above may not be possible without the acquisition of additional right of way. Such right of way may be acquired by
governmental bodies as part of customary roadway projects funded by such governmental bodies; if not then in such event after
the exercise of diligent good faith efforts over a minimum of a 60 day period, the Petitioner is unable to acquire any land
necessary to provide for any such additional right of way upon commercially reasonable terms and at market prices, then CDOT,
the City of Charlotte Engineering Division or other applicable agency, department or governmental body agree to proceed with
acquisition of any such land. In such event, the Petitioner shall reimburse the applicable agency, department or governmental
body for the cost of any such acquisition including compensation paid by the applicable agency, department or governmental
body for any such land and the expenses of such proceedings. Furthermore, in the event public roadway improvements
referenced in subsection a. above are delayed because of delays in the acquisition of additional right-of-way as contemplated
herein and such delay extends beyond the time that the Petitioner seeks to obtain a certificate of occupancy for building(s) on the
Site in connection with related development phasing described above, then CDOT will instruct applicable authorities to allow the
issuance of certificates of occupancy for the applicable buildings; provided, however, Petitioner continues to exercise good faith
efforts to complete the applicable road-way improvements; in such event the Petitioner may be asked to post a letter of credit or a
bond for any improvements not in place at the time such a certificate of occupancy is issued to secure completion of the
applicable improvements.
e. Alternative Improvements. Changes to the above referenced roadway improvements can be approved through the
Administrative Amendment process upon the determination and mutual agreement of Petitioner, CDOT and the Planning
Director; provided, however, the proposed alternate transportation improvements provide (in the aggregate) comparable
transportation network benefits to the improvements identified in this Petition.
5.Access, Streets & Streetscape, Buffers, Yards and Open Space:
a.Access to the Site will be from Graham Street, Statesville Avenue, Woodward Street and Sylvania Street as generally
depicted on the Rezoning Plan.
b.[Public or private street connections will not be provided from Woodward Street.]
c.[Street cross-sections will be provided on the Site as generally depicted on [Sheet RZ-01].
d.[Public streets will be provided on the Site as generally depicted on [Sheet RZ-01].
e.Pedestrian and vehicular connections through a combination of sidewalks, woonerfs, and private streets will be provided
as generally depicted on [Sheet RZ-01].
f.As indicated, the Site shall be considered a unified development plan and as such internal separation standards such as
buffers, side and/or rear yards may be eliminated, subject to the normally required Staff review and approval process.
g.Above-ground backflow preventers will be screened from public view and will be located outside of the required
setbacks.
h.Dumpster areas and recycling areas will be enclosed by a solid wall or fence with one side being a decorative gate. The
wall or fence used to enclose the dumpster will be architecturally compatible with the building materials and colors used on the
principal building.
i.Open Space will be provided as generally depicted on [Sheet RZ-02]. New Buildings construction on the Site will use
this Open Space to count toward future open space requirements.
6.Architecture/Vertical Design Standards:
[NOTE TO TEAM: the following design standards are preliminary for continued review and consideration]
a.General Design Intent. [TO BE FORTHCOMING]
b.[Existing Buildings. The following standards shall apply to all Adaptive Reuses of the Existing Buildings:
(i) Renovated Existing Building(s) shall have fenestration through vision glass, doors or active outdoor spaces along
30% of the building side that fronts the public right-of-way or private street between two (2) feet and eight (8) feet of the
ground floor. If the building architecture or site prohibits meeting the above condition, Planning Director or designee may
approve alternative approaches.
(ii) When renovated or Adaptive Uses provided, primary building orientation with prominent pedestrian entrances will
be established for the areas so renovated or Adaptive Reuse areas as generally depicted on [Sheet RZ-01]. [NOTE TO
TEAM: to be reviewed]
(iii)[NOTE TO TEAM: probably best to identify areas along existing building facades that should be exempt such
as those along Graham rather than a full carve out] Except as expressly noted for certain areas along Existing
Buildings as generally on Sheet RZ-01, utilities shall be screened and shall not be visible from the public streets; this
includes, mechanical and electrical equipment, utility meters, dumpsters, and backflow preventers. No permanent
fencing shall be located between the building and the public street.
c.[New Buildings. The following standards shall apply to all New Buildings constructed on the Site: [NOTE TO TEAM:
another review needed for applicability]
(i) New Buildings fronting Statesville Avenue and Woodward Avenue shall not have parking between the building
and the street. Parking shall be permitted to the side of the building.
(ii) New Buildings fronting Graham Street and Sylvania Avenue may have parking, maneuvering and loading between
the building and the street without limitation.
(iii) Proposed parking deck(s) in [Development Area “C”] generally depicted on sheet RZ-02 shall be permitted
without active ground floor use. Decorative louvers or grillwork shall be utilized to screen cars on all facades facing public
streets.
(iv) New Building heights shall not exceed 180 feet. New Buildings located on and fronting Woodward Avenue,
Statesville Avenue, Graham Street and Sylvania Avenue taller than 70 feet will have a building step-back 60' above grade
or lower that is a minimum of 10'deep. If the building setback is increased by 10'and improved as an amenity area, the
building step back is not required. This standard does not apply to New Buildings developed at the center of the site that
are not located on the setback of the above noted streets.
(v) New Buildings principally for residential uses (“Residential Building(s)”) will have a four (4) foot transition zone
between the sidewalk or a multi-use trail provided along public or any required private network streets. The principle
building will not be allowed to be located in the four (4) foot transition zone, however, stoops, porches, steps, rails, and
similar items may be located within the transition zone.
(vi) Residential Building(s) entrances shall be at or slightly above grade (individual unit entrances will be located a
minimum of one (1) to two (2) feet above grade), and shall be highly visible and architecturally treated as prominent
pedestrian entrances through a combination of at least five (5) of the following features: (1) decorative pedestrian
lighting/sconces; (2) architectural details carried through to upper stories; (3) covered porches, canopies, awnings or
sunshades; (4) archways; (5) transom windows; (6) terraced or raised planters that can be utilized as seat walls; (7) common
outdoor seating enhanced with specialty details, paving, landscaping or water features; (8) double doors; (9) stoops or stairs;
and/or (10) contrasting pavement from primary sidewalk.
(vii) Non-residential facades, excluding parking decks located in [Development Area C], fronting on public streets shall
include a minimum of 40% transparent glass between two feet (2') and eight feet (8') on the first floor. Shadow boxes or
window graphics may be utilized behind transparent glass to screen bathrooms, back of house or kitchens, but may not
exceed more that 40% of the total required building transparency requirement.
(viii) The scale and massing of multi-tenant non-residential or Residential Buildings longer than 150 feet along a street
shall be minimized by utilizing a combination of the following options: (1) varied roof lines through the use of slopes,
modulated buildings heights, gables, dormers or innovative architectural solutions; (2) building corners to provide visual
interest at the pedestrian level as well as to differentiate roof lines or highlight ground floor uses; (3) horizontal and vertical
variations in wall planes; and/or (4) architectural protrusion.
(ix) Principle entrances for all New Buildings will be connected via a sidewalk to adjacent public or private street
sidewalks.
(x) Between the New Building(s) principally used for non-residential uses and the sidewalk there shall be a transition
zone. For such uses the transition zone may be a wider sidewalk, artwork, outdoor dining, artwork, bike racks, and
landscaping or streetscape amenities.
(xi)[Utilities shall be screened and shall not be visible from the public street. This includes, mechanical and electrical
equipment, utility meters, dumpsters, and backflow preventers. No fencing shall be located between the building and
the public street.
7.Environmental Features:
a.The Petitioner shall comply with the Charlotte City Council approved and adopted Post Construction Ordinance.
b. The Site will comply with the Tree Ordinance, as reflected in that certain letter dated _______________, 2017, whereby
certain matters regarding compliance are set forth to insure implementation of the Tree Ordinance provisions based on
appropriate interpretations of the Tree Ordinance reflecting the unique nature of this project redevelopment. [NOTE TO TEAM:
proposed approach relates to incorporation of interpretation letter that we have discussed].
c.Open space shall be provided as generally depicted on [Sheet RZ-01] and shall be used to meet the open space
requirements for New Buildings. Open space, as defined in Section 1.i.(iv) of these Development Standards, may include a
combination of the following features: raised planters, seat walls, benches, outdoor dining, displays of art, water features, play
amenities, specialty pavers or other similar features or amenities that encourage people to gather. [NOTE TO TEAM: in
SURFHVVRIORRNLQJDWVSHFLDO³8UEDQ2SHQ6SDFH´GHILQLWLRQWRDOLJQSURMHFWQHHGVDQG808'DVUHODWHVWR1HZ
Buildings.]
8.Signage & Signage Optional Variations. [NOTE TO TEAM: see attached sample signage provisions that need
review; some of these provisions may be too lenient and not needed based on the project needs so thank you for advising.]
The UMUD signage provisions may be modified to allow a signage system that accounts for the unique nature of this signature
mixed use project consisting of Adaptive Uses of the Existing Buildings in a large urban setting and helps to create a vibrant
sense of place while encouraging and connectivity among uses. Accordingly, all signage associated with the Site shall conform to
Section 13.108(a) of the Ordinance with the exception of the following Optional variations:
a. Allowable signage types include all detached and attached signs permitted under Chapter 13 including and/or in addition
to projecting signs and/or roof signs that may extend up to [20] feet above and/or beyond the roof or parapet;
b. Permitted signage types include all signs permitted under Chapter 13 including and/or in addition to the following:
-[computer programmable L.E.D. systems with full-color, full-matrix display,]
-[full color outdoor video display,]
-blade signs,
-decorative signs,
-fabricated letters, symbols and/or logos,
-message centers including ticker tape type moving messages,
-signs with moveable parts,
-marquee signs,
-movie posters, signs and/or banners,
-changeable copy signs,
-on premises signage,
-[movie type projected images from either direct projection or rear screen projection,]
-digitally printed vinyl wall signs wrapped around a supporting structure,
-murals/artwork, and
-advertising banners.
c. Wall signage may:
-cover up to [40%] of a single wall but may not cover more than an average of [30%] of the total area of the building
walls (no additional area limitation shall apply to wall signage and there is no additional maximum area per wall or
tenant);
-be transferred to another wall;
-be located on any exterior building wall and/or any interior atrium/ gallery wall; and
-extend up to [15] feet above and/or beyond the parapet or roofline of the building;
d. Signage may cover all or a part of an individual window but may not cover more than [30%] of the total window area of a
building. Window signage shall not be calculated as a part of the maximum allowable wall signage area noted above;
e. [Signage may extend from a building face and/or up to [15] feet above and/or beyond the parapet or roof. Projecting signs
located over [9] feet in height that conform to the standard UMUD sign provisions outlined in Section 13.108a(2) may be
installed and the area of those signs shall be included within and calculated as part of the area outlined above in Section 8.c.
above. There shall be no limit on the maximum sign area of individual projecting signs. A projecting sign may be located on any
building wall. Projecting signage shall not be calculated as a part of the maximum allowable wall signage area noted. ]
f. Canopies and/or awnings nor signs contained thereon shall not be calculated as a part of the maximum allowable wall
signage area noted above.
g. [Up to [8] monolithic style monument signs of up to [15] feet in height may be placed within the required setbacks as long
as they do not block sidewalks. Such detached signage will be limited to project and/or tenant/user identification signs.]
h. [All signs may be internally or externally lit by any means and at any times, may be temporary or permanent and may be
in a fixed location or movable.
i. Artwork, such as but not limited to murals, may be painted directly onto the building facades or digitally printed on an
acrylic or vinyl type material and permanently applied to facades of buildings.
j. In no event shall digitally printed vinyl projecting signs nor internally illuminated flat panel acrylic face embossed signs
with translucent vinyl graphics be allowed;
k. Any sign upon which the copy relates to upcoming or pending tenant/user sales events or building space leasing matters is
subject to the standard UMUD sign provisions outlined in Section 13.108(a) rather than these shall “Optional” provisions.
l. [Although lighting on the Site or buildings thereon are not considered signage under the Ordinance, these provisions
recognize that lighting will be a design element for the project. Any type of lighting, such as but not limited to accent lighting,
Tivoli type lighting, neon lights, flashing lights, colored lights, attached lighting, major or minor projecting lighting, light beams
of any color and lamppost lighting may be utilized on the Site. Any lighting on the Site shall not be calculated as a part of the
maximum allowable wall signage area noted above. In addition, year-round decorative lighting may be attached to trees on the
site and/or within abutting rights-of-way subject to any necessary approval from the appropriate governmental entity.]
m. The following way-finding signage may be install on the Site:
_________________________________________________________________.
9.Lighting:
a.All new detached and attached lighting shall be full cut-off type lighting fixtures excluding lower, decorative lighting that
may be installed along the driveways, sidewalks, and parking areas.
b.Detached lighting on the Site will be limited to 25 feet in height.
10.Amendments to the Rezoning Plan:
a.Future amendments to the Rezoning Plan (which includes these Development Standards) may be applied for by the then
Owner or Owners of the portion of the Site affected by such amendment in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 6 of the
Ordinance.
11.Binding Effect of the Rezoning Application:
a.If this Rezoning Petition is approved, all conditions applicable to the development of the Site imposed under the Rezoning
Plan will, unless amended in the manner provided under the Ordinance, be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Petitioner
and subsequent owners of the Site and their respective heirs, devisees, personal representatives, successors in interest or assigns.
REVISIONS:DATE:
DESIGNED BY:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
Q.C. BY:
SHEET #:
SCALE:
PROJECT #:
CAMP NORTH END | REZONING
MIXED USE + INDUSTRIAL REHAB DEVELOPMENT
ATCO PROPERTIES & MANAGEMENT
27 FEBRUARY 2017
1016320 PETITION NO. 2017-xxx

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. www.LandDesign.com
V: 704.333.0325 F: 704.332.3246
223 N Graham Street, Charlotte, NC 28202
NC Engineering Firm License # C-0658
REZONING NOTES
AS SHOWN

RZ-N1
Appendix B

Data Summary Maps and Tables (includes Exhibit 2)

Tables
 11-22-16 Exhibit 2 – Brownfields Agreement (Site-wide sampling prior to 11-22-16)
 03-01-18 Table 2 – Summary of Soil Analytical Data (Water Tower Area)
 04-03-18 Table 1 - Summary of Soil Analytical Data (Railspur and SSB-8 Area)
 11-28-18 Table 1 - Summary of UST Closure Soil Sample Results (Fuel Oil UST Closure)

Maps
 11-22-16 Brownfields Plat Maps (Site-wide sampling prior to 11-22-16)
 03-01-18 Shallow Soil Sample Location Map (Water Tower Area)
 04-03-18 Figure 2 - Sample Location Map (Railspur and SSB-8 Area)
 11-28-18 Figure 2 – Sample Location Map (Fuel Oil UST Closure)

Exhibit 2 Shell 2/14/2017 (this is removed when approved for PC)
ATL-001/Name (DRAFT or Final Date)

1
Exhibit 2

The most recent environmental sampling at the Property reported in the Environmental Reports occurred on November 22, 2016. The following tables set forth, for contaminants present at the Property above unrestricted use standards or screening levels, the most recent
concentration found at each sample location, and the applicable standard or screening level.
Screening levels and groundwater standards are shown for reference only and are not set forth as
cleanup levels for purposes of this Agreement. GROUNDWATER

Groundwater contaminants in micrograms per liter (the equivalent of parts per billion),
the standards for which are contained in Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2L (2L), Rule .0202, (April 1, 2013 version):
Groundwater
Contaminant
Sample
Location
Date of
Sampling
Concentration
Exceeding
Standard (µg/L)
NCAC 02L.0202
Standard
(µg/L)
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-10 7/27/2012 170 3.0
Carbon Tetrachloride COEMW-11 7/26/2012 5.1 0.30
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-13 7/25/2012 360 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-14 7/27/2012 130 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-15 7/26/2012 14 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-21 5/2001 1,490 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-22 7/26/2012 130 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-23 7/27/2012 28 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-24 7/30/2012 3.5 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-29 5/2001 2,980 3.0
Carbon Tetrachloride HEI-05-02 7/24/2012 0.4 0.30
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) HEI-05-02 7/24/2012 1.0 0.7
Trichloroethylene (TCE) HEI-05-02 7/24/2012 3,400 3.0
Carbon Tetrachloride HEI-05-04 7/24/2012 0.99 0.30
Trichloroethylene (TCE) HEI-05-04 7/24/2012 140 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) HEI-05-05 7/24/2012 390 3.0
Carbon Tetrachloride HEI-06-02 7/30/2012 0.66 0.30
Trichloroethylene (TCE) HEI-06-02 7/30/2012 11 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) HEI-06-03 7/27/2012 87 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) HEI-06-08 7/27/2012 49 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) MW-1 11/2007 553 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) MW-1A 7/27/2012 6,500 3.0
Nitrate as Nitrogen MW-2 7/27/2012 16.3 10 (mg/L)
Trichloroethylene (TCE) MW-4 5/2008 3,510 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) MW-6 7/27/2012 39 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-03 7/26/2012 100 3.0
Exhibit 2 Shell 2/14/2017 (this is removed when approved for PC)
ATL-001/Name (DRAFT or Final Date)

2
Carbon Tetrachloride SAIC-04 7/26/2012 1.2 0.30
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) SAIC-04 7/26/2012 0.78 0.30
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-04 7/26/2012 220 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-07 5/2001 483 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-08 7/26/2012 5500 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-09 5/2001 982 3.0
1,1-Dichloroethene SAIC-10 7/25/2012 0.41 0.4
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) SAIC-10 7/25/2012 0.99 0.30
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-10 7/25/2012 4,600 3.0
Carbon Tetrachloride SAIC-13 7/27/2012 2.6 0.30
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-13 7/27/2012 72 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-14 7/26/2012 6,400 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-15 7/22/2012 310 3.0
Carbon Tetrachloride SAIC-16 7/25/2012 0.38 0.30
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) SAIC-16 7/25/2012 1.3 0.30
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-16 7/25/2012 7,000 3.0
Groundwater
Contaminant
Sample
Location
Date of
Sampling
Concentration
Exceeding
Standard (µg/L)
NCAC 02L.0202
Standard
(µg/L)
Carbon Tetrachloride SAIC-17 7/25/2012 0.8 0.30
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) SAIC-17 7/25/2012 2.8 0.30
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-17 7/25/2012 14,000 3.0
1,1-Dichloroethene SAIC-20 7/25/2012 0.52 0.4
Carbon Tetrachloride SAIC-20 7/25/2012 0.97 0.3
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) SAIC-20 7/25/2012 3.2 0.30
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-20 7/25/2012 12,000 3.0
1,1-Dichloroethene SAIC-21 7/25/2012 0.62 0.4
Carbon Tetrachloride SAIC-21 7/25/2012 0.64 0.30
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) SAIC-21 7/25/2012 2.7 0.30
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-21 7/25/2012 12,000 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-22 7/26/2012 12,000 3.0
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-23 7/26/2012 13,000 3.0
Benzene TMW-1 5/6/2016 1.26 1.0

Exhibit 2 Shell 2/14/2017 (this is removed when approved for PC)
ATL-001/Name (DRAFT or Final Date)

3

GROUNDWATER VAPOR INTRUSION RISK

Groundwater contaminants with potential for vapor intrusion (VI) in micrograms per liter (the equivalent of parts per billion), the vapor intrusion screening levels for which are derived from the Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels of the Division of Waste Management
October 2016 version):
Groundwater
Contaminant with
Potential for Vapor
Intrusion
Sample
Location
Date of
Sampling
Concentration
Exceeding Screening
Level (µg/L)
Groundwater Screening
Level (µg/L)
Residential VI
Screening Level1
(µg/m3)
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-10 7/27/2012 170 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-13 7/25/2012 360 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-14 7/27/2012 130 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-15 7/26/2012 14 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-21 5/2001 1,490 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-22 7/26/2012 130 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-23 7/27/2012 28 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-24 7/30/2012 3.5 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) COEMW-29 5/2001 2,980 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) HEI-05-02 7/24/2012 3,400 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) HEI-05-04 7/24/2012 140 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) HEI-05-05 7/24/2012 390 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) HEI-06-02 7/30/2012 11 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) HEI-06-03 7/27/2012 87 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) HEI-06-08 7/27/2012 49 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) MW-1 11/2007 553 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) MW-1A 7/27/2012 6,500 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) MW-4 5/2008 3,510 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) MW-6 7/27/2012 39 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-03 7/26/2012 100 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-04 7/26/2012 220 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-07 5/2001 483 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-08 7/26/2012 5500 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-09 5/2001 982 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-10 7/25/2012 4,600 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-13 7/27/2012 72 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-14 7/26/2012 6,400 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-15 7/22/2012 310 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-16 7/25/2012 7,000 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-17 7/25/2012 14,000 1.04 0.417
Exhibit 2 Shell 2/14/2017 (this is removed when approved for PC)
ATL-001/Name (DRAFT or Final Date)

4
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-20 7/25/2012 12,000 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-21 7/25/2012 12,000 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-22 7/26/2012 12,000 1.04 0.417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SAIC-23 7/26/2012 13,000 1.04 0.417
1 Screening levels displayed for non-carcinogens are for a hazard quotient equal to 0.2. Screening levels displayed for carcinogens are for a 1.0E-5 lifetime incremental cancer risk. 2 NS – Screening level or regulatory not established.
SOIL

Soil contaminants in milligrams per kilogram (the equivalent of parts per million), the
screening levels for which are derived from the Preliminary Industrial Health- Based Soil Remediation Goals of the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch of DEQ’s Superfund Section (October 2016 version):
Soil Contaminant Sample Location Depth (ft) Date of Sampling
Concentration
Exceeding Screening Level
(mg/kg)
Residential Screening Level1 (mg/kg)
Benzo[a]pyrene SB-8 8-10’ 3/24/2016 0.571 0.16
Benzo[b]fluoranthene SB-8 8-10’ 3/24/2016 0.216 0.16
1,2,4-
Trimethylbenzene SB-17 10-12’ 5/9/2016 15.5 11.6
Hexavalent Chromium SB-25 5-6’ 5/10/ 23.2 0.30
Antimony SB-26 5-6’ 5/10/2016 22.8 6.2
Hexavalent Chromium SB-26 5-6’ 5/10/2016 1,680 0.3
Trichloroethylene
(TCE) SB-26 12-15’ 5/10/2016 11.7 0.82
Chrome (III) Pipe Pit Bldg. 1
Surficial
Soil in Bldg. Crawlspace
2/9/2005 72,060 24,000
Hexavalent Chromium Pipe Pit
Bldg. 1
Surficial Soil in
Bldg.
Crawlspace
2/9/2005 7,940 0.30
Cyanide Pipe Pit Bldg. 1
Surficial
Soil in Bldg.
Crawlspace
2/9/2005 3.3 0.54
Hexavalent Chromium SSB-1 0-2’ 11/21/2016 2.18 0.30
Benzo[a]pyrene SSB-4 0-2’ 11/21/2016 0.125 0.0160
Benzo[b]fluoranthene SSB-4 0-2’ 11/21/2016 0.179 0.160
Benzo[a]anthracene SSB-9 0-2’ 11/21/2016 0.243 0.160
Exhibit 2 Shell 2/14/2017 (this is removed when approved for PC)
ATL-001/Name (DRAFT or Final Date)

5
Soil
Contaminant
Sample
Location Depth (ft) Date of
Sampling
Concentration
Exceeding
Screening Level (mg/kg)
Residential
Screening Level1 (mg/kg)
Benzo[a]pyrene SSB-9 0-2’ 11/21/2016 0.215 0.0160
Benzo[b]fluoranthene SSB-9 0-2’ 11/21/2016 0.417 0.160
Indeno[1,2,3-
cd]pyrene
SSB-9 0-2’ 11/21/2016 0.167 0.160
Benzo[b]fluoranthene SSB-10 0-2’ 11/21/2016 0.446 0.160
Lead SSB-10 0-2’ 11/21/2016 406 400
Hexavalent Chromium SSB-10 0-2’ 11/21/2016 6.19 0.30
1Screening levels displayed for non-carcinogens are for a hazard quotient equal to 0.2. Screening levels displayed for carcinogens are for a 1.0E-6 lifetime incremental cancer risk.
NE – No established screening level

SUB-SLAB VAPOR

Soil gas contaminants in micrograms per cubic meter, the screening levels for which are
derived from Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels of the Division of Waste
Management (October 2016 version):

Sub-Slab Vapor
Contaminant
Sample
Location
Date of
Sampling
Concentration Exceeding Screening
Level (µg/m3)
Residential Screening Limit1
(µg/m3)
Trichloroethylene (TCE) SSV-1 4/22/2016 20 13.9
Trichloroethylene
(TCE) SSV-4 4/25/2016 34,000 13.9
Chloroform SSV-5 4/25/2016 1,300 156
Tetrachloroethene SSV-5 4/25/2016 990 278
Trichloroethylene
(TCE) SSV-5 4/25/2016 3,000,000 13.9
Trichloroethylene
(TCE) SSV-11 4/25/2016 730 13.9
Acrolein MVSSV-1 11/22/2016 1.5J 0.139
Acrolein MVSSV-2 11/22/2016 1.4J 0.139
Acrolein MVSSV-3 11/22/2016 1.7J 0.139
Acrolein MVSSV-4 11/22/2016 1.4J 0.139
1Screening levels displayed for non-carcinogens are for a hazard quotient equal to 0.2. Screening levels
displayed for carcinogens are for a 1.0E-5 lifetime incremental cancer risk.
Exhibit 2 Shell 2/14/2017 (this is removed when approved for PC)
ATL-001/Name (DRAFT or Final Date)

6

INDOOR AIR

Indoor air contaminants in micrograms per cubic meter, the screening limits for which are derived from Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels of the Division of Waste Management (October 2016 version):

Indoor Air
Contaminant

Sample
Location
Date of
Sampling
Concentration
Exceeding
Screening
Level (µg/m3)
Residential
Screening
Level1
(µg/m3)
Acrolein IAS-1 6/4/2016 4.5 0.00417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) IAS-1 6/4/2016 1.6 0.417
Acrolein IAS-2 6/4/2016 3.3 0.00417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) IAS-2 6/4/2016 54 0.417
Acrolein IAS-3 6/4/2016 5.0 0.00417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) IAS-3 6/4/2016 24 0.417
Acrolein IAS-4 6/4/2016 3.5 0.00417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) IAS-4 6/4/2016 19 0.417
Acrolein IAS-5 6/4/2016 5.5 0.00417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) IAS-5 6/4/2016 27 0.417
Acrolein IAS-6 6/4/2016 1.9 0.00417
Trichloroethylene (TCE) IAS-6 6/4/2016 1.0 0.417
Acrolein IAS-7 6/4/2016 1.7 0.00417
Acrolein IAS-8 6/4/2016 2.5 0.00417
Acrolein IAS-9 6/4/2016 2.3 0.00417
Acrolein IAS-10 6/4/2016 2.7 0.00417
Acrolein IAS-11 9/17/2016 1.2J 0.00417
Acrolein IAS-13 9/17/2016 0.75J 0.00417
Acrolein IAS-15 9/17/2016 3.6 0.00417
Acrolein IAS-16 9/17/2016 4.0 0.00417
Acrolein IAS-17 9/17/2016 4.3 0.00417
Acrolein IAS-18 9/17/2016 2.8 0.00417
Acrolein IAS-19 9/17/2016 1.2J 0.00417
Acrolein IAS-20 9/17/2016 0.7J 0.00417
Acrolein IAS-21 9/17/2016 <1.6 0.00417
Acrolein IAS-22 9/17/2016 1.4J 0.00417
Acrolein IAS-23 9/17/2016 4.8 0.00417

1Screening limits displayed for non-carcinogens are for a hazard quotient equal to 0.2. Screening levels displayed for carcinogens are for a 1.0E-6 lifetime incremental cancer risk.

Table 2 (Page 1 of 1)Summary of Soil Analytical DataWater Tower AreaRite Aid Brownfields SiteCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ATL-001SSB-10 HA-1 HA-2 HA-3 Dup-1 HA-4 HA-5 HA-6(0-2 ft)Residential Industrial/PSRGs (1) CommercialDate11/21/20161/12/2018 PSRGs (2) Published (3) Site Specific (4)VOCs by EPA 8260B (mg/kg)2-Butanone (MEK)78-93-3<0.0706 <0.04950.0145 J 0.0504 J 0.00867 J 0.0173 J 0.0210 J<0.004835500 28000 -- --Acetone67-64-1 0.240.0585 0.206 0.219 0.196 0.227 0.269 B<0.0079512,000 100,000-- --Chloromethane74-87-3<0.00282<0.00198 <0.001770.00261<0.00220 <0.00215 <0.00254 <0.00063423 99-- --SVOCs by EPA 8270D (mg/kg)Benzo[a]anthracene56-55-3<0.4230.0515 J 0.157 0.0450 J<0.08350.0882<0.0905 <0.03821.121-- --Benzo[a]pyrene50-32-8<0.4230.0533 J0.1410.0475 J<0.08350.0935<0.0905 <0.03440.11 2.1-- --Benzo[b]fluoranthene205-99-2 0.4460.0624 J 0.152 0.0454 J<0.08350.0990<0.0905 <0.03571.1 21-- --Benzo[g,h,i]perylene191-24-2<0.4230.0435 J 0.107<0.0891 <0.08350.0716 J<0.0905 <0.0420NE NE-- --Benzo[k]fluoranthene207-08-9<0.4230.0511 J 0.139<0.0891 <0.08350.0849 J<0.0905 <0.034411 210-- --Chrysene218-01-9<0.4230.0582 J 0.172 0.0534 J<0.08350.108<0.0905 <0.0471110 2,100-- --Fluoranthene206-44-0 0.6140.109 0.317 0.107 0.0430 J 0.185 0.0650 J<0.0433480 6,000-- --Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene193-39-5<0.423<0.08310.0907<0.0891 <0.08350.0620 J<0.0905 <0.03691.1 21-- --Phenanthrene85-01-8<0.4230.0452 J 0.135 0.0552 J<0.08350.0839 J<0.0905 <0.0433NE NE-- --Pyrene129-00-0 0.5020.0798 J 0.221 0.0817 J<0.08350.148 0.0516 J<0.0433360 4,500-- --Metals by 6020D (mg/Kg)Antimony7440-36-0<12.7<0.6090.354 J<0.618 <0.634 <0.628 <0.642<0.6266.3 93 <1.0-8.8 NDArsenic7440-38-25.8610.4 F14.494.412.58 2.75 2.22 2.30 F10.68 3 1.0-18 <2.35 - 5.25Beryllium7440-41-7<1.270.380 J F1 0.363 J 0.350 J 0.285 J 0.343 J 0.296 J 0.347 J F131 470 ND-2.0 NDCadmium7440-43-9 2.22 0.387 J 0.320 J 0.659 0.412 J 0.507 J 0.483 J<0.62614 200 1.0-10 <1.12 - 1.64Chromium, Total7440-47-3 63.7 32.2 F1 33.8 36.2 21.5 35.8 22.2 29.5 F1 -- --7-300 23.4 - 70.7Trivalent Chromium (Cr III)**7440-47-3 57.5 32.0 33.8 35.8 20.5 35.5 20.4 29.5 F123,000 100,000--23.4 - 70.7Copper7440-50-8 37.9 79.2 F1 70.9 51.8 48.8 53.4 45.3 52.6630 9,300 3-100 5.74 - 37.2Lead7439-92-1406160 F2 1992,5301,330715217 26.3400*** 800*** ND-50 13.3 - 53.4Nickel7440-02-0 13.6 15.3 F1 13.0 9.03 5.58 11.2 8.37 13.9 F1310 4,700 ND-150 3.62 - 13.7Selenium7782-49-2 6.68 0.380 J F1 0.419 J 0.512 J 0.487 J 0.547 J 0.482 J 0.392 J F178 1,200 <0.1-0.8 <2.41 - 7.77Silver7440-22-4 NA 0.138 J F1<0.596 <0.618 <0.634 <0.6280.158 J<0.62678 1,200-- --Thallium7440-28-0<2.55 <0.244 <0.596 <0.618 <0.634 <0.628 <0.642<0.6260.16 2.3 0.15-2.6* <2.23 - 2.7Zinc7440-66-6 203 72.4 F2 F1 70.4 87.2 48.9 58.2 42.2 36.4 F14,700 70,000 25-124 <12.7 - 71.3Mercury by 7471B (mg/Kg)Mercury7439-97-6 0.2 0.206 0.988 0.0509 J 0.114 J 0.126 J 0.113 J<0.03684.7 70 0.03-0.52 <0.108 - 0.303HPLC/IC by 7199 (mg/Kg)Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI)18540-29-96.19****0.245<0.1870.397 0.9990.3041.67<0.1930.31 6.5--<2.35 - 2.18 JNotes:1) NC Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Residential Health Based Soil Remediation Goals - October 20172) NC DEQ Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Industrial Health Based Soil Remediation Goals - October 20173) Range Background values for North Carolina or Southeast US soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 20054) Range of Site-Specific metal background concentrations collected by H&H at the Rite Aid Brownfields site on November 21, 2016 excluding soil sample SSB-10* Conova, Judy (1999) Elements in South Carolina Inferred Background Soil and Stream Sediment Samples, South Carolina Geology, V41, p. 11-25** the chromium III concentration was calculated as the difference between the total chromium and the chromium VI (hexavalent chromium) concentrations*** lead values compared to EPA Regional Screening Levels for Soil - November 2017**** hexavalent chromium analyzed in soil sample SSB-10 by EPA Method 7196Grey or ND indicates non-detectBold and underlined indicates exceedance of Industrial/Commercial PSRGmg/kg = milligrams per kilogram; ft bgs = feet below ground surfaceVOCs=volatile organic compound; SVOCs=semi-VOCs; NE=not established; NA=not analyzedJ = Analyte detected at a level less than the RL and greater than or equal to the MDL; concentrations in this range are estimatedF1 = Matrix Spike (MS) and/or Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Recovery is outside acceptance limitsF2 = MS/MSD RPD exceeds control limitsNC DEQ Screening Criteria(0-1 ft) (0-1 ft) (0-1 ft) (0-1 ft)BackgroundMetals1/9/2018Bold indicates exceedance of Residential PSRGCAS Number(0-1 ft) (0-1 ft)Sample IDS:\AAA-Master Projects\ATCO LLC - ATC\Task-009 Brownfields\Water Tower Soil Sampling\Table\Water Tower Soil Assessment with 6020Table 1 (Page 1 of 1) Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)Summary of Soil Analytical DataRailspur and SSB-8 AreasRite Aid Brownfields SiteCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. ATL-001SSB-8 SSB-8A SSB-8B RS-1 RS-2 RS-3 RS-4Residential Industrial/PSRGs (1) CommercialDate11/21/2016PSRGs (2) Site Specific (3)VOCs by EPA 8260B (mg/kg)Acetone67-64-1 0.0678NA NA0.23 0.47 0.30 0.29 12,000 140,000 --SVOCs by EPA 8270D (mg/kg)Acenaphthene 83-32-9<0.0779NA NA<0.450.14 J<0.43 <0.54720 9,000 --Acenaphthylene 208-96-8<0.0779NA NA<0.450.16 J<0.43 <0.54NE NE --Anthracene 120-12-7<0.0779NA NA<0.450.53<0.43 <0.543,600 45,000 --Benzo[a]anthracene56-55-3<0.0779NA NA2.1 1.5<0.43 <0.541.1 21 --Benzo[a]pyrene50-32-8<0.0779NA NA3.01.4<0.43 <0.540.11 2.1 --Benzo[b]fluoranthene205-99-2<0.0779NA NA3.7 2.00.14 J<0.541.1 21 --Benzo[g,h,i]perylene191-24-2<0.0779NA NA2.1 0.90<0.43 <0.54NE NE --Benzo[k]fluoranthene207-08-9<0.0779NA NA1.4 0.73<0.43 <0.5411 210 --Chrysene218-01-9<0.0779NA NA1.5 1.3<0.43 <0.54110 2,100 --Dibenzo(a, h)anthracene53-70-3<0.0779NA NA0.45 0.22 J<0.43 <0.540.11 2.1 --Fluoranthene206-44-0<0.0779NA NA3.1 2.9 0.16 J<0.54480 6,000 --Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene193-39-5<0.0779NA NA2.30.99<0.43 <0.541.1 21 --Pentachlorophenol87-86-5<0.0779NA NA0.57<0.059 <0.051 <0.0641.0 4.0 --Phenanthrene85-01-8<0.0779NA NA0.14 J 2.0<0.43 <0.54NE NE --Pyrene129-00-0<0.0779NA NA3.2 2.6 0.15 J<0.54360 4,500 --Metals by 6010/6020D (mg/Kg)Arsenic7440-38-2<2.35 NANA3.1126.72.90.683.0<2.35 - 5.25Barium7440-39-3NA NANA92 130 100 1403,10047,000--Cadmium7440-43-9<1.17 NANA0.51 1.5 0.26 J 0.24 J14200<1.12 - 1.64Chromium, Total7440-47-3 29.1NANA49 100 59 110 -- --23.4 - 70.7Copper7440-50-8 27NANANA NA NA NA630 9,3005.74 - 37.2Lead7439-92-1 34NANA34 230 31 19 400** 800**13.3 - 53.4Nickel7440-02-0 11.5NANANA NA NA NA310 4,7003.62 - 13.7Selenium7782-49-2 4.96NANA1.4 2.0 1.4 1.8781,200<2.41 - 7.77Silver7440-22-4<1.17 NANA3.1 0.26 J 0.55 0.23 J781,200 --Thallium7440-28-02.70.22 J0.18 JNA NA NA NA0.16 2.3 0.15-2.6Trivalent Chromium (Cr III)*7440-47-3 29.1NANA49 100 59 109.3523,000350,00023.4 - 70.7Zinc7440-66-6 71.3NANANA NA NA NA4,70070,000<12.7 - 71.3Mercury by 7471B (mg/Kg)Mercury7439-97-6<0.114 NA NA0.045 0.15 0.060 0.0792.3 9.7 <0.108 - 0.303HPLC/IC by 7196A (mg/Kg)Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI)18540-29-9<5.89 NA NA<0.55 <0.61 <0.520.650.31 6.5 <2.35 - 2.18 JNotes:1) NC Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Residential Health Based Soil Remediation Goals - February 20182) NC DEQ Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Industrial Health Based Soil Remediation Goals - February 20183) Range of Site-Specific metal background concentrations collected by H&H at the Rite Aid Brownfields site on November 21, 2016 excluding soil sample SSB-10* the chromium III concentration was calculated as the difference between the total chromium and the chromium VI (hexavalent chromium) concentrations** lead values compared to EPA Regional Screening Levels for Soil - February 2018Grey or ND indicates non-detectBold and underlined indicates exceedance of Industrial/Commercial PSRG and site-specific background metal concentrationsmg/kg = milligrams per kilogram; ft bgs = feet below ground surfaceVOCs=volatile organic compound; SVOCs=semi-VOCs; NE=not established; NA=not analyzedJ = Analyte detected at a level less than the RL and greater than or equal to the MDL; concentrations in this range are estimatedNC DEQ Screening Criteria(0-1 ft) (0-1 ft)Background Metals3/22/2018Railspur AreaNortheast of Building #50Bold indicates exceedance of Residential PSRG and site-specific metal CAS Number(0-1 ft) (0-1 ft)Sample ID(0-2 ft) (0-2 ft)(0-2 ft)3/22/2018S:\AAA-Master Projects\ATCO LLC - ATC\Railspur Sampling\Railspur Soil Assessment with 6020Table 1 (Page 1 of 1) Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1Summary of UST Closure Soil Sample ResultsFormer Rite AidCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job. No. ATL-001MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP MADEP 8260B 8260B 8260B8260B 8260B 8260B 8260B 8260B 8260B 8260B 8260B 8260B 8260B 8260B 8260B 8260B 8270D 8270DSample IDDate Collected Source AreaSample Depth (ft)Incident PhaseSW-N 03/16/18 Fuel Oil UST 9 ft CL <16 0.96 J 0.29 J 1.25 <30 <16 <12 <12 <0.0055 <0.0055 0.0070 J <0.0055 0.043 J <0.0033 <0.0055 <0.0055 0.0029 J<0.011 <0.011 <0.0055 <0.0055 <0.0055 <0.0055 <0.016 <0.40 <0.40SW-E 03/16/18 Fuel Oil UST 9 ft CL <16 <16 0.30 J 0.30 J <31 <16 <12 <12 <0.0052 <0.0052 <0.10 <0.0052 0.013 J <0.0031 <0.0052 <0.0052 0.0023 J <0.010 <0.010 <0.0052 <0.0052 <0.0052 <0.0052 <0.016 <0.41 <0.41SW-S 03/16/18 Fuel Oil UST 9 ft CL <18 <18 0.27 J 0.27 J <32 <18 <13 <13 <0.0062 <0.0062 <0.12 <0.0062 0.011 J0.016<0.0062 <0.0062 0.0030 J <0.012 <0.012 <0.0062 <0.0062 <0.0062 <0.0062 <0.016 <0.42 <0.42SW-W 03/16/18 Fuel Oil UST 9 ft CL <19 <19 0.29 J 0.29 J <32 <19 <13 <13 <0.0056 <0.0056 0.0026 J 0.0025 J 0.026 J <0.0034 <0.0056 <0.0056 <0.011 <0.011 <0.11 <0.0056 <0.0056 <0.0056 <0.0056 <0.017 <0.42 <0.42BS-E 03/16/18 Fuel Oil UST 9 ft CL280980 4401,4208.8 J 270 35305 135.1 <1.31.4<1.3 <0.33 0.14 J 1.6 <0.33 0.42 J2.91.72.01.6 0.31 J 0.42 J0.551.1BS-W 03/16/18 Fuel Oil UST 9 ft CL <18 <18 0.30 J 0.30 J <33 <18 <13 <13 <0.0057 <0.0057 <0.11 <0.0057 0.0043J <0.0034 0.0052 J 0.0052 J <0.011 <0.011 <0.011 <0.0057 0.0040 J 0.0050 J <0.0057 <0.017 <0.44 <0.44NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS68 NS NS 540 Immobile NS NS 31 8.5 8.3 16 0.12 24 0.0056 4.9 1.7 0.020 4.6 0.16 4.3 1.7 3.3 3.4 4.6 0.0040 3.6939 NS NS 1,500 31,000 NS NS 469 782 782 9,385 100 14,000 18 1,560 1,564 85 3,129 313 626 626 626 626 3,129 20 6324,528 NS NS 40,000 810,000 NS NS 12,264 20,400 20,400 245,280 4,000 360,000 164 40,000 40,880 763 81,760 8,176 16,350 16,350 16,350 16,350 81,760 1001,635NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NSNotes:Concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Bold concentrations exceed appropriate standard.1) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005.Bold indicates concentration above Soil to Groundwater MSCCJ = Detected but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result is an estimated concentrationXylenesNaphthalenen-Butylbenzenen-Propylbenzenesec-ButylbenzeneRegional Background Metals in Soil1 (Range/Mean) (mg/kg)VPH C5-C8 Aliphatics Soil to Groundwater MSCC (mg/kg)2-ButanoneMethylene ChlorideBenzene1,2,4-TrimethylbenzeneEPH C9-C18 AliphaticsIndustrial/Commercial MSCC (mg/kg)Total C9-C18 AliphaticsEPH C19-C36 AliphaticsEPH C11-C22 AromaticsTotal C9-C22 AromaticsUST = Underground Storage Tank Basin; SP = Stockpile; CL = Closure; NA = Not Analyzed/Not Applicable; TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons; GRO = Gasoline Range Organics; MSCC = Maximum Soil Contaminant ConcentrationBold and underlined indicates concentration exceeds of NC DEQ Residential MSCCAction Level (mg/kg)Residential MSCC (mg/kg)Isopropylbenzene1-Methylnaphthalene2-Methylnaphthalene4-Isopropyltoluenem,p-XylenesAnalytical MethodContaminant of ConcernVPH C9-C12 Aliphatics VPH C9-C10 Aromatics tert-Butylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneAcetoneEthylbenzeneS:\AAA-Master Projects\ATCO LLC - ATC\UST Pull\Tables\UST Basin Excavation Sample Table\Soil Data_THV_DRAFT11/26/2018Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PC
SSV-11
IAS-7
SB-26
MW-4
TMW-1
SSV-11
IAS-7
SB-26
MW-4
TMW-1
SHALLOW SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
RITE AID BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY
1776 STATESVILLE AVENUE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
JOB NO:
REVISION NO:
FIGURE NO:
3/1/18 0
2ATL-001050100
APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEETN 2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100Charlotte, NC 28203704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f)
SHALLOW SOIL BORING LOCATION (0-1 ft bgs)
WATER TOWER
HA-5HA-3/
Dup-1
HA-4HA-2
HA-1
HA-6
APPROX. EXTENT OF IMPACTED SOIL
SSB-8
RS-4
RS-3
RS-2
RS-1
SSB-8B
SSB-8A
JOB NO. ATL-001
REVISION NO. 0DATE: 4-3-18
FIGURE NO. 2
RITE AID FACILITY
1776 STATESVILLE AVENUE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SAMPLE LOCATION MAPN. GRAHAM STREETLEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
SHALLOW SOIL BORING (0-2 FT) (H&H; 2017)
SHALLOW SOIL BORING LOCATION (0-2 FT) (H&H; 2018)
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
BUILDING 50
\\hhfs01.harthickman.local\masterfiles\AAA-Master Projects\ATCO LLC - ATC\Railspur Sampling\Figures\Sample Location Map.dwg, FIG 2, 4/3/2018 2:53:11 PM, zbarlow
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. ATL -001
DATE: 4.2.18
FIGURE NO. 2
CAMP NORTH END
1776 STATESVILLE AVENUE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
LEGEND
APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
BASIN SOIL EXCAVATION
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL
CONFIRMATION SOIL SAMPLE
FORMER 5,000-GALLON
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
FORMER FUEL LINE
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
NOTE:
AERIAL IMAGE PROVIDED BY PROBE UTILITY LOCATING ON
FEBRUARY 14, 2018.
SW-N
BLDG
48
5,000-GALLON
#2 FUEL OIL
5,000-GALLON
#2 FUEL OIL
5,000-GALLON
#2 FUEL OIL
5,000-GALLON
#2 FUEL OIL
5,000-GALLON
#2 FUEL OIL
5,000-GALLON
#2 FUEL OIL
5,000-GALLON
#6 FUEL OIL
5,000-GALLON
#6 FUEL OIL
TMW-1
SW-E
SW-S
SW-W BS-W BS-E
APPROXIMATE END OF
FUEL LINES
C:\Users\erichardson\Desktop\Ust and Sample Loc Map.dwg, FIG 2, 11/26/2018 5:14:02 PM, erichardson

Appendix C
Contingency Plan
1
Contingency Plan
Rite Aid Site
(Former Charlotte Army Missile Plant)
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project #20050-16-060
H&H Job No. ATL-001

1.0 Introduction

This Contingency Plan is being provided as required by Part 9 of the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) template Environmental Management Plan
(EMP) for the proposed redevelopment at the Rite Aid Site (site or subject site),
Brownfields Program ID No. 20050-16-060, located at 1776 Statesville Avenue in
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The site is comprised of three parcels
totaling 47.76 acres. The site contains former industrial use buildings and open space and
is currently vacant. A site location map is provided as Figure 1.

The site is planned to be redeveloped as a mixed-use development including office,
industrial, commercial, retail, high-density residential, parking, entertainment, hotel,
storage unit, amenity space, recreation, institutional, and transit. However,
redevelopment plans including grading, utility line installation, and construction plans
have not been developed.

This Contingency Plan has been prepared to identify the management policies and field
procedures to be taken to address known and potential unknown environmental
conditions during site redevelopment. A site map depicting current site buildings,
previous sample locations, and areas of known impacts is provided as Figure 3.
2
2.0 Procedures to Manage USTs Based on Known Conditions

Previous Underground Storage Tank (UST) Activities
During previous Phase I and II ESA activities, H&H identified eight (8) unregistered
underground storage tanks (USTs) presumed to have contained fuel oil in a tank basin
located the north of Building 2 and west of Building 48. The USTs location were
identified during a geophysical survey utilizing ground penetrating radar (GPR) and
electromagnetic (EM) survey techniques. Based on the approximate dimensions of the
USTs identified during the geophysical survey, the sizes of the USTs appear to range
between 6,000 and 8,000-gallons each.

In March 2018, eight (8) 5,000-gallon underground storage tanks (USTs) that contained
#2 and #6 fuel oil were removed from the Site at a location adjacent and west of Building
9 (formerly identified as Rite Aid Building 48). The USTs were operated by the US
Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) as part of the Department of Defense (DOD) operations
and were abandoned in place at a time prior to the late 1960s. Prior to removal, H&H
notified the DEQ Brownfields Program of the property owner’s plans to remove the
USTs in April 2018 and submitted a Work Plan approved by DEQ on March 1, 2018.
DEQ approved the Work Plan for removal of the USTs in an authorization letter dated
March 1, 2018.

During UST removal activities, H&H found the tops, sides, and bottom of the eight (8)
USTs within the former UST basin entombed in concrete. After removal of
approximately 2,300 gallons of #6 fuel oil from USTs No. 1 and 2, and approximately
36,450 gallons of rinse water and residual water identified in the remaining USTs No. 3
through 8, the eight (8) USTs were removed from the basin by EVO. Concrete
previously poured on top and along the sides of the USTs was broken and removed to
extract the USTs. EVO extracted approximately 83.66 tons of petroleum-impacted soil
(mixed with broken concrete) from the excavation during UST removal activities. The
fuel oil and rinse water pumped from the USTs prior to removal, and the petroleum-
impacted soil (mixed with concrete) removed from the excavation were transported off-
3
site by EVO accompanied by manifests to their permitted facility located at 1703
Vargrave Street in Winston-Salem, NC for disposal as non-hazardous waste.
Approximately 18-inches of concrete remains at the base of the excavation that limited
soil excavation below the USTs.

USTs No. 1, 2, 3, and 4 were transported off-site by EVO for recycling at Triad Metal
Recycling of Yadkinville, NC. The remaining four USTs No. 5, 6, 7, and 8 were retained
by the property owner after obtaining approval from the DEQ UST Section, DEQ
Brownfields, and the City of Charlotte Fire Department. The property owner has plans to
leave the remaining USTs on-Site for use as art/historical artifacts and Site landscape
features.

With approval from DEQ Brownfields, approximately 555 tons (estimated 370 cubic
yards) of clean import soil was obtained from The Railyard (a.k.a. the HD Supply
Brownfields Site [BF #19054-15-060]) located at 1414 and 1422 S. Tryon Street in
Charlotte, NC. Because there were no indications of a release, a layer of overburden
gravel encountered below the asphalt pavement was stockpiled and re-used on the surface
of the excavation after backfill and prior to future repaving activities. The clean import
soil was compacted in approximate one-foot lifts using a Ramex compaction device and
capped with approximately three inches of the overburden gravel to meet the existing
grade. The UST area was then paved with a layer of asphalt during improvements made
to the courtyard area (i.e., installation of canopies).

The results of analysis of the closure soil samples collected from the UST basin indicated
that aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and a
semi-VOC (SVOC) were detected at concentrations above DEQ soil-to-groundwater
maximum soil contaminant concentrations (MSCCs) but below residential and
commercial/industrial MSCCs. The results of analysis for a groundwater sample
collected from a downgradient temporary monitoring well reported benzene at a
concentration slightly above the NC 2L groundwater standard but well below the GCL.
Based on these findings, DEQ opened an incident #40861 for the UST release incident.
4

Based on a reconnaissance of the Site and surrounding area, H&H did not locate evidence
of a water supply well or other potential receptors in the area. Additionally, the USTs are
located in area designated on the Brownfields Agreement Plat Map as an “area of
potential soil contamination” and the existing Brownfields Agreement for the property
restricts groundwater use at the Site.

Therefore, due to: 1) the limitation for additional soil excavation as a result of 18 inches
of concrete in the base of the former UST basin, 2) the lack of petroleum-impacted soil
above residential and commercial/industrial MSCCs remaining in the confirmation
sidewall and base soil samples, 3) the low detection of benzene only slightly above the
2L groundwater standard in a downgradient groundwater sample, 4) the lack of potential
receptors located in the area of the former UST basin, and 5) the existing Brownfields
Agreement for the Site which currently restricts groundwater use on the property and
requires management of soil excavated from the area of the former UST basin in
accordance with a DEQ Brownfields Environmental Management Plan (EMP), DEQ
issued a No Further Action (NFA) letter dated December 18, 2018 for closure of Incident
#40861.

Future UST Activities
If additional orphan USTs are identified during future redevelopment activities, the USTs
will be removed in accordance with DEQ UST Section requirements. Initial UST
removal activities will include uncovering the UST using a mini-excavator and shovels
and removal of residual fluids (if needed) for proper off-site disposal at a permitted
facility. Following uncovering and removal of residual fluids, dry ice (carbon dioxide)
will be added to purge potential explosive vapors from the tank before it is removed from
the ground. A lower explosion level (LEL) meter will be utilized to monitor for an
explosive atmosphere in the tank during the purging process. Tank purging will continue
until readings within the tank are less than 10% of the LEL. Following purging, the tanks
will be removed from the ground; the exterior of the tanks will be cleaned of soil and
5
loaded onto a trailer for off-site recycling or disposal. The contractor shall provide a
receipt or disposal certificate for the removed USTs.

In the event that obvious evidence of petroleum impacted soil is identified within the
excavation, one soil sample will be collected from the tank basin below each identified
leaking UST. A minimum of four sidewall samples will also be collected to determine
horizontal extent of petroleum impacted soil within the excavation. Soil samples will be
submitted to the laboratory for analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA
Method 8260B, semi-VOCs (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270D, and Hazardous Substance
List (HSL) metals by EPA Methods 6020/7471 (plus hexavalent chromium). DEQ will
be notified if significant impacts are suspected within 48 hours of discovery. For safety
purposes, and to allow redevelopment to continue, the excavation will be backfilled using
clean fill.
6

3.0 Site Contingency Plan Based on Unknown Conditions

During construction activities, contractors may encounter unknown sub-surface
environmental conditions (i.e. tanks, drums, or waste materials) that if encountered, will
require proper management.

In the event that such conditions are encountered during site development activities, the
tasks noted below will be used to direct environmental actions to be taken during these
activities.

1. During soil disturbance at the site, the project environmental engineer will
observe soils for evidence of potential significantly impacted soil in the “areas of
potential soil contamination” as depicted on the Brownfields plat. The project
environmental engineer will also observe construction activities for potentially
impacted soil during periodic site visits, while attending periodic meetings with
Camp North End staff, and during periodic oversight/inspection of ongoing and
future environmental activities. Additionally, Camp North End staff will notify
project environmental engineer of significant pending redevelopment activities
prior to commencement. During redevelopment activities, workers or contractors
will also observe soils for evidence of potential significantly impacted soil in the
remaining areas at the site that may not be suitable to leave in place in exposed
areas at a residential use site. Evidence of potential significant impacted soil
includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed
materials of concerns (i.e. chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be
noted during site work, the contractor will contact the project environmental
engineer to observe the suspect condition. If the project environmental engineer
confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures below will be
implemented. As noted in Section 1.0, the environmental engineer will contact
the DEQ Brownfields project manager within 48 hours to advise that person of
the condition.
7
2. If a previously unidentified UST is encountered during redevelopment, it will be
addressed in consultation with the Brownfields program.

3. Soil sampled in accordance with Paragraph 3 of this section and other soil to be
removed from this site will be handled in the manner described below based upon
the laboratory analyses:

i. If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not
exceed the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs (other than which
are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are
consistent with Site-specific background levels for metals),
then the soil may be used on-site or on the adjacent Hercules
Brownfields site (with Brownfields approval) as fill without
conditions, or transported to a permitted disposal facility.

ii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the
DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs (other than which are
attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are
consistent with site-specific background levels for metals), then
the soil, with DEQ’s approval, may be used on-site or on the
adjacent Hercules Brownfields site (with Brownfields
approval) for use as fill below an impervious surface, beneath
at least two ft of compacted clean soil, or transported to a
permitted disposal facility.

4. If excavation of unexpected impacted soils occurs, confirmation sampling will be
conducted for purposes of recording areas of impacts remaining at the site, if any,
and to determine if additional soil to be removed for construction should be
managed as impacted. It is anticipated that four sidewall soil samples and one
base soil sample will be collected as post-excavation confirmation samples. The
confirmation samples will be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals
8
(plus hexavalent chromium). Areas of suspected contaminated soil that remain at
the site after excavation is complete above the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs
shall be incorporated into the Brownfields plat.

5 With DEQ’s written approval, corrective actions shall ensure there is a barrier
between future site visitors/occupants/workers and soil that remains in place, if
any, at concentrations above DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs. The barrier may be
a building, paving, hardscape surface, or clean soil of a two ft minimum
overlaying thickness.

6 If a sub-grade feature or pit is encountered and does not require removal for
geotechnical or construction purposes, it will be filled with soil or suitable fill and
construction will proceed. Where appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated
before back filling to prevent fluid accumulation. If the pit has waste in it, the
waste will be set aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste disposal
purposes for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, and TCLP metals and disposed off-site
at a permitted facility or the waste will be managed in accordance with Paragraph
3 of this section above, whichever is most applicable based on the type of waste
present.

7 If buried piping is encountered and must be removed to allow installation to
proceed, the contractor will inspect the pipe for fluids, collect the fluids where
appropriate, and look for signs of a release using the abovementioned field
methods. If the nature of the fluids is unknown, the collected fluids will be
sampled for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals to determine appropriate
disposition of the fluid.

Dust Control
Dust will be controlled by keeping site access roads and active work areas damp and by
watering or misting as necessary prior to and during grading activities. A water truck
and/or appropriate water misting equipment will be available if needed at the Site during
9
work activities that may suppress dust. Non-impacted stormwater or groundwater
encountered during construction may be used for dust control.

Appendix D
Former Charlotte Army Missile Plant (MV Hercules) Brownfields
Agreement and Survey Plat