16036_PCA Inter_SPLP MEP Report 2011.12.05

Terracon Consultants, Inc. 2020 Starita Road, Suite E Charlotte, North Carolina 28206
P [704] 509 1777 F [704] 509 1888 terracon.com

December 5, 2011

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality – Aquifer Protection Section
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115

Attn. Mr. Andrew Pitner

Re: Results of Additional Soil Sampling
Former PCA Facility
815 Matthews Mint Hill Road
Matthews, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Terracon Project No. 71087772
Dear Mr. Pitner:

Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) appreciates the opportunity to submit the results of these
additional soil sampling activities completed at the Former PCA Facility located at 815 Matthews
Mint Hill Road in Matthews, North Carolina to the North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDENR) on behalf of CPI Corp.

On October 11, 2011, Terracon submitted a Proposed Work Plan to the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ). The Proposed Work Plan was developed to address your concerns about the
presence of silver at concentrations above the established site-specific Soil to Groundwater
Maximum Contaminant Concentration.

Terracon, with assistance from CPI Corp., calculated a site-specific Soil Screening Level (SSL)
for silver that is protective of groundwater. The site-specific soil concentration for silver was
calculated utilizing the NCDENR Transport Model for Calculation of Soil-To-Groundwater
Maximum Contaminant Concentrations. Based on the model, Terracon determined the site-
specific SSL to be 82.88 mg/kg for silver. The site-specific SSL is below the highest silver
concentration identified during our soil sampling activities; therefore, conservative modeling
techniques indicate a potential for silver to impact groundwater at the site. As you stated earlier,
the presence of silver at levels above the site-specific SSL indicated the potential to adversely
impact groundwater and the NCDENR could not issue a No Further Action (NFA) letter for the
site without deed restriction covenants.

Terracon proposed collection of additional soil samples at the site for analysis utilizing the
Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP) by EPA Method 1312 and Multiple
Former PCA Facility Matthews, North Carolina
December 5, 2011

2
Extraction Procedure (MEP) by EPA Method 1320. The purpose of these analytical procedures
is to simulate the short-term (SPLP) and longer-term (MEP) leachability effects of water on
silver in soils at the site. A procedural description of both analytical methods was provided by
the laboratory that will perform the analysis. The method descriptions are attached to this
report.

Typically, SPLP and MEP analyses are conducted on soils that will remain in place at sites that
have exhibited elevated metals concentrations. Terracon has utilized SPLP and MEP analyses
at the request of NCDENR’s Hazardous Waste Section at a former firing range site where soils
with elevated lead and chromium concentrations will remain on the firing range property.

On October 19, 2011, Terracon received an email from Mr. Andrew Pitner indicating the
Proposed Work Plan submitted on October 11, 2011 was approved by the Division of Water
Quality.

Terracon Work Plan proposed the collection of four soil samples from former boring locations
that exhibited elevated concentrations of silver during past sampling activities. The four
sampling locations are listed below:

• Boring 1B at 3 to 4 feet below ground surface (bgs);
• Boring 13A at 9 to 10 feet bgs;
• Boring 14A at 3 to 4 feet bgs; and,
• Boring Office B at 6 to 7 feet bgs.

The selected boring locations and depths were representative of the highest concentrations of
silver detected in soils underlying the basement area. The proposed sampling locations included
fill materials and native soils with the intent of establishing the potential for migration of silver
through different soil types at the site.

During the soil sample collection activities completed on November 2, 2011, Terracon adjusted
the soil sampling depths slightly based on the presence of staining. Terracon attempted to
collect samples that exhibited most intense black staining which is indicative of the presence of
silver sulfate compound in the soils.

A soil sample from each of the four locations was analyzed for SPLP by EPA Method 1312.
The four soil samples were also composited in equal proportions to create one sample to be
analyzed for MEP by EPA Method 1320.

The following table presents the soil sample locations, depths selected for analysis, and silver
analytical results:

Former PCA Facility Matthews, North Carolina
December 5, 2011

3
Sample Location Sample Depth SPLP Silver Results
1-B 3 to 4 feet BDL
13-A 6 to 7 feet BDL
14-A 4 to 5 feet 0.15 mg/L
Office B 5 to 6 feet BDL
BDL – Below laboratory detection limit
mg/L – milligrams/Liter

After receipt of laboratory analytical results, Terracon compared the SPLP silver concentration
identified in sample location 14-A to the site-specific Soil to Groundwater Maximum
Contaminant Concentration of 82.88 mg/kg calculated in April 2011. The sample collected from
location 14-A exhibited the highest concentration of silver detected at the site since
investigations began in 2009. Please note that Terracon is assuming the media of concern is
groundwater and that one liter of water weighs one kilogram; therefore, for the purpose of this
report, mg/L is equivalent to mg/kg. As such, the presence of silver at location 14-A (0.15 mg/L)
is equivalent to a silver concentration at 0.15 mg/kg. Therefore, the silver concentration reported
at 311 mg/kg in soils at location 14-A exhibited minimal transfer (leaching) from the soil to water
(0.15 mg/L) during the SPLP laboratory analysis. The amount of silver transferred (leached)
from silver in soils to water was calculated at 0.048 percent.

Terracon compared the silver concentration determined by SPLP methods in sample 14-A to
the North Carolina 2L Groundwater Quality Standard for silver (0.020 mg/L). We consider the
2L standard applicable since the SPLP method tumbles the soil sample with water for a 24-hour
period. After tumbling, the sample is filtered and the water collected after filtration is analyzed
for silver. This testing method is intended to simulate the silver concentration in groundwater
and should therefore be compared to the 2L Standard. The concentration detected from sample
14-A (0.15 mg/L), is slightly above the 2L Standard of 0.020 mg/L.

The MEP composite sample was analyzed through four complete extractions and did not exhibit
detectable levels of silver in any of the extractions. Without detectable levels of silver in the first
four extractions, Terracon considers the MEP analysis completed even though the results for all
10 extractions were not determined. Based on the initial MEP results, Mr. Pitner agreed that
additional extractions would not be necessary.

During the 2010 Terracon Initial Site Sampling and Assessment and Cleanup Plan activities,
three groundwater monitoring wells were installed at the site. After allowing the wells to
equilibrate, groundwater was measured in the two wells located in proximity to the building and
approximate elevation as the basement slab flooring. Depth from the grade surface to
groundwater was approximately 20 feet below the basement slab flooring elevation and the
SPLP result for sample 14-A exhibited minimal transference from soil to water. Further, silver
was not identified above laboratory detection limits in the groundwater samples collected from
the two downgradient wells during the 2010 investigation. Based on the results of the SPLP
Former PCA Facility Matthews, North Carolina
December 5, 2011

4
analysis, it appears there is minimal short term potential for silver to leach from impacted soils to
groundwater in the location where highest silver levels were detected (0.048 percent). Silver
was not detected during the first four extractions of the MEP analysis; therefore, Terracon does
not consider silver to be a long-term risk to groundwater at the site.

Terracon respectfully requests site closure based on the results of the SPLP/MEP analyses, in
conjunction with the previously completed site closure activities and the insoluble/immobile
characteristics of the photograph developing compounds utilized at the site.

We appreciate your assistance with this project. Please contact us if you have questions
regarding these results or if we can provide additional information.

Sincerely,
Terracon Consultants, Inc.

Chris Kelly, LEED AP Christopher L. Corbitt, P.G.
Environmental Scientist Environmental Services Manager

Attachments:
Boring Location Diagram
Laboratory Analytical Results
Basement Silver Concentrations Table
SPLP EPA Method 1312
MEP EPA Method 1320

December 05, 2011
LIMS USE: FR - CHRIS KELLY
LIMS OBJECT ID: 92105726
92105726
Project:
Pace Project No.:
RE:
Mr. Chris Kelly
Terracon
2020 Starita Rd
Charlotte, NC 28206
FORMER PCA FACILITY
Dear Mr. Kelly:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on November 03, 2011.
The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless
otherwise noted in the body of the report.
Analyses were performed at the Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte
page for analysis unless otherwise footnoted.
This report was revised 12/5/11 to report only Silver, per client request.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Herring
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 1 of 6
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
CERTIFICATIONS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92105726
FORMER PCA FACILITY
Asheville Certification IDs2225 Riverside Dr., Asheville, NC 28804Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87648
Massachusetts Certification #: M-NC030North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37712North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 40
South Carolina Certification #: 99030001Virginia Certification #: 00072
West Virginia Certification #: 356Virgina/VELAP Certification #: 460147
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 2 of 6
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92105726
FORMER PCA FACILITY
Lab ID Sample ID Method
Analytes
Reported LaboratoryAnalysts
92105726001 14-A 4-5 EPA 6010 1 PASI-AJMW
92105726002 OFFICE B 5-6 EPA 6010 1 PASI-AJMW
92105726003 13-A 6-7 EPA 6010 1 PASI-AJMW
92105726004 1-B 3-4 EPA 6010 1 PASI-AJMW
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 3 of 6
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92105726
FORMER PCA FACILITY
Sample:14-A 4-5 Lab ID:92105726001 Collected:11/02/11 10:40 Received:11/03/11 10:05 Matrix:Solid
Results reported on a "dry-weight" basis
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
6010 MET ICP, SPLP Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Silver 0.15 mg/L 1 11/09/11 17:38 7440-22-4 N211/09/11 09:550.0050
Sample:OFFICE B 5-6 Lab ID:92105726002 Collected:11/02/11 10:50 Received:11/03/11 10:05 Matrix:Solid
Results reported on a "dry-weight" basis
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
6010 MET ICP, SPLP Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Silver ND mg/L 1 11/09/11 17:44 7440-22-4 N211/09/11 09:550.0050
Sample:13-A 6-7 Lab ID:92105726003 Collected:11/02/11 12:30 Received:11/03/11 10:05 Matrix:Solid
Results reported on a "dry-weight" basis
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
6010 MET ICP, SPLP Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Silver ND mg/L 1 11/09/11 17:49 7440-22-4 N211/09/11 09:550.0050
Sample:1-B 3-4 Lab ID:92105726004 Collected:11/02/11 12:45 Received:11/03/11 10:05 Matrix:Solid
Results reported on a "dry-weight" basis
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
6010 MET ICP, SPLP Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3010
Silver ND mg/L 1 11/09/11 18:06 7440-22-4 N211/09/11 09:550.0050
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 12/05/2011 04:23 PM Page 4 of 6
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92105726
FORMER PCA FACILITY
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
MPRP/9368
EPA 3010
EPA 6010
6010 MET SPLP
Associated Lab Samples:92105726001, 92105726002, 92105726003, 92105726004
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:684437
Associated Lab Samples:92105726001, 92105726002, 92105726003, 92105726004
Matrix:Water
Analyzed
Silver mg/L ND 0.0050 N211/09/11 17:33
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
684438LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
Silver mg/L 0.25 N2.25 101 80-120
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
684440MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
MSSpike
Result
92105726002
Silver mg/L 1.4 N21.2 112 75-125ND
Parameter Units
Dup
Result QualifiersRPDResult
92105726001
684439SAMPLE DUPLICATE:
Silver mg/L 0.26 D6,N2530.15
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 12/05/2011 04:23 PM Page 5 of 6
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
QUALIFIERS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92105726
FORMER PCA FACILITY
DEFINITIONS
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of
the sample aliquot, or moisture content.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (8270 listed analyte) decomposes to Azobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
SG - Silica Gel - Clean-Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether, Styrene, and Vinyl chloride.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
LABORATORIES
Pace Analytical Services - AshevillePASI-A
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
The relative percent difference (RPD) between the sample and sample duplicate exceeded laboratory control limits.D6
The lab does not hold TNI accreditation for this parameter.N2
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Date: 12/05/2011 04:23 PM Page 6 of 6
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
205 East Meadow Road - Suite A
Eden, NC 27288
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
Project: Former PCA Facility
Pace Project No.: 92105726
Sample: MEP Composite Lab ID: 92105726005 Collected: 11/2/2011 Received: 11/3/2011 Matrix: Soil
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
EP TOX Extraction Analytical Method: EPA 6010, EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 1310
Initial pH 5.1 units 0.1 1 11/7/2011
Final pH 6 units 0.1 1 11/8/2011
Silver ND mg/L 0.025 1 11/9/2011 11/9/2011
Date:11/16/2011 13:30
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
Project: Former PCA Facility
Pace Project No.: 92105726
Sample: MEP Composite Lab ID: 92105726005 Collected: 11/2/2011 Received: 11/3/2011 Matrix: Soil
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
MEP Extraction1 Analytical Method: EPA 6010, EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 1320
Initial pH 5.1 units 0.1 1 11/8/2011
Final pH 5.6 units 0.1 1 11/9/2011
Silver ND mg/L 0.025 1 11/10/2011 11/11/2011
Date:11/16/2011 13:30
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
Project: Former PCA Facility
Pace Project No.: 92105726
Sample: MEP Composite Lab ID: 92105726005 Collected: 11/2/2011 Received: 11/3/2011 Matrix: Soil
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
MEP Extraction2 Analytical Method: EPA 6010, EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 1320
Initial pH 5.8 units 0.1 1 11/9/2011
Final pH 5.3 units 0.1 1 11/10/2011
Silver ND mg/L 0.025 1 11/10/2011 11/11/2011
Date:11/16/2011 13:30
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
Project: Former PCA Facility
Pace Project No.: 92105726
Sample: MEP Composite Lab ID: 92105726005 Collected: 11/2/2011 Received: 11/3/2011 Matrix: Soil
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
MEP Extraction3 Analytical Method: EPA 6010, EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 1320
Initial pH 4.5 units 0.1 1 11/10/2011
Final pH 5.4 units 0.1 1 11/11/2011
Silver ND mg/L 0.025 1 11/14/2011 11/15/2011
Date:11/16/2011 13:30
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
Project: Former PCA Facility
Pace Project No.: 92105726
Sample: MEP Composite Lab ID: 92105726005 Collected: 11/2/2011 Received: 11/3/2011 Matrix: Soil
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
MEP Extraction4 Analytical Method: EPA 6010, EPA 7470 Preparation Method: EPA 1320
Initial pH 4.3 units 0.1 1 11/11/2011
Final pH 3.8 units 0.1 1 11/12/2011
Silver ND mg/L 0.025 1 11/14/2011 11/15/2011
Date:11/16/2011 13:30
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
Table 1: Results of Total Silver in Soils
Former PCA Facility
Matthews, North Carolina
Terracon Project: 71087772
0 to 1 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 4 to 5 5 to 6 6 to 7 7 to 8 8 to 9 9 to 10 10 to 11 11 to 12 12 to 13 13 to 14 14 to 15 15 to 16
0A 11/9/2009 156 BDL X X
0B N/A
1B 11/10/2009 X X 145 X X
2A 11/10/2009 BDL BDL X
2B 11/10/2009 BDL BDL X X
3B 11/10/2009 BDL BDL X X
4A 6/25/2009 and
11/10/2009 1.2 BDL X X
5A 6/25/2009 BDL
5B 11/10/2009 0.76 BDL X
7A 6/25/2009 0.65
7A-A 11/9/2009 BDL BDL X X
7B 6/25/2009 BDL
8B 11/10/2009 1.5 BDL X
9A 6/25/2009 7.0
9A-A 11/9/2009 BDL BDL X X
9B 11/10/2009 BDL BDL X X
10A 11/10/2009 3.6 BDL X X
10B 11/9/2009 X BDL X BDL X
11A 6/25/2009 BDL
11B 11/10/2009 X 1.8 BDL BDL X
12A 11/9/2009 1.4 7.3 X 3.7
12B 11/9/2009 BDL 0.47 X X
13A 11/9/2009 36.8 X 110 X 188
13B 6/25/2009 196
13B-A 11/9/2009 2.1 X X 4.9 X
14A 6/25/2009 and
11/9/2009 311 68.9 X 171 X 134
14B 11/9/2009 0.42 X BDL X 48.5
14B-A 11/10/2009 237 24.6 X X
SumpN 6/25/2009 12.2
SumpN-A 11/9/2009 X X 8.0 X X X
Office 6/25/2009 10.0
Office A 11/9/2009 X 4.2 X 9.7 X
Office B 11/9/2009 X 1.0 X X 129
Office C N/A
Office D 11/10/2009 X BDL X BDL
Hall 6/25/2009 13.9
O1 (Outside 1)6/25/2009 BDL
O2 (Outside 2)6/25/2009 BDL
O3 (Outside 3)8/24/2009 0.033J
O4 (Outside 4)8/24/2009 0.65J
O5 (Outside 5)8/24/2009 BDL
All results in milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg)
Bold font indicates concentrations are above the NCDENR Hazardous Waste Branch Soil Screening Level for silver (0.217 mg/kg)
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit
X - Soil sample was not submitted for laboratory analysis
Empty field denotes sample was not collected from that interval
N/A - Sample not collected `
BDL - Below laboratory detection limits
Boring
Location Date Sampled
Sample Depth (in feet below grade)
CD-ROM 1312 - 1 Revision 0
September 1994
METHOD 1312
SYNTHETIC PRECIPITATION LEACHING PROCEDURE
1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION
1.1 Method 1312 is designed to determine the mobility of both organic
and inorganic analytes present in liquids, soils, and wastes.
2.0 SUMMARY OF METHOD
2.1 For liquid samples (i.e., those containing less than 0.5 % dry
solid material), the sample, after filtration through a 0.6 to 0.8 µm glass fiber
filter, is defined as the 1312 extract.
2.2 For samples containing greater than 0.5 % solids, the liquid phase,
if any, is separated from the solid phase and stored for later analysis; the
particle size of the solid phase is reduced, if necessary. The solid phase is
extracted with an amount of extraction fluid equal to 20 times the weight of the
solid phase. The extraction fluid employed is a function of the region of the
country where the sample site is located if the sample is a soil. If the sample
is a waste or wastewater, the extraction fluid employed is a pH 4.2 solution.
A special extractor vessel is used when testing for volatile analytes (see Table
1 for a list of volatile compounds). Following extraction, the liquid extract
is separated from the solid phase by filtration through a 0.6 to 0.8 µm glass
fiber filter.
2.3 If compatible (i.e., multiple phases will not form on combination),
the initial liquid phase of the waste is added to the liquid extract, and these
are analyzed together. If incompatible, the liquids are analyzed separately and
the results are mathematically combined to yield a volume-weighted average
concentration.
3.0 INTERFERENCES
3.1 Potential interferences that may be encountered during analysis are
discussed in the individual analytical methods.
4.0 APPARATUS AND MATERIALS
4.1 Agitation apparatus: The agitation apparatus must be capable of
rotating the extraction vessel in an end-over-end fashion (see Figure 1) at 30
+ 2 rpm. Suitable devices known to EPA are identified in Table 2.
4.2 Extraction Vessels
4.2.1 Zero Headspace Extraction Vessel (ZHE). This device is for
use only when the sample is being tested for the mobility of volatile
analytes (i.e., those listed in Table 1). The ZHE (depicted in Figure 2)
allows for liquid/solid separation within the device and effectively
precludes headspace. This type of vessel allows for initial liquid/solid
VITON® is a trademark of Du Pont.1
CD-ROM 1312 - 2 Revision 0
September 1994
separation, extraction, and final extract filtration without opening the
vessel (see Step 4.3.1). These vessels shall have an internal volume of
500-600 mL and be equipped to accommodate a 90-110 mm filter. The devices
contain VITON O-rings which should be replaced frequently. Suitable ZHE®1
devices known to EPA are identified in Table 3.
For the ZHE to be acceptable for use, the piston within the ZHE
should be able to be moved with approximately 15 psig or less. If it
takes more pressure to move the piston, the O-rings in the device should
be replaced. If this does not solve the problem, the ZHE is unacceptable
for 1312 analyses and the manufacturer should be contacted.
The ZHE should be checked for leaks after every extraction. If the
device contains a built-in pressure gauge, pressurize the device to 50
psig, allow it to stand unattended for 1 hour, and recheck the pressure.
If the device does not have a built-in pressure gauge, pressurize the
device to 50 psig, submerge it in water, and check for the presence of air
bubbles escaping from any of the fittings. If pressure is lost, check all
fittings and inspect and replace O-rings, if necessary. Retest the
device. If leakage problems cannot be solved, the manufacturer should be
contacted.
Some ZHEs use gas pressure to actuate the ZHE piston, while others
use mechanical pressure (see Table 3). Whereas the volatiles procedure
(see Step 7.3) refers to pounds-per-square-inch (psig), for the
mechanically actuated piston, the pressure applied is measured in torque-
inch-pounds. Refer to the manufacturer's instructions as to the proper
conversion.
4.2.2 Bottle Extraction Vessel. When the sample is being
evaluated using the nonvolatile extraction, a jar with sufficient capacity
to hold the sample and the extraction fluid is needed. Headspace is
allowed in this vessel.
The extraction bottles may be constructed from various materials,
depending on the analytes to be analyzed and the nature of the waste (see
Step 4.3.3). It is recommended that borosilicate glass bottles be used
instead of other types of glass, especially when inorganics are of
concern. Plastic bottles, other than polytetrafluoroethylene, shall not
be used if organics are to be investigated. Bottles are available from a
number of laboratory suppliers. When this type of extraction vessel is
used, the filtration device discussed in Step 4.3.2 is used for initial
liquid/solid separation and final extract filtration.
4.3 Filtration Devices: It is recommended that all filtrations be
performed in a hood.
4.3.1 Zero-Headspace Extraction Vessel (ZHE): When the sample
is evaluated for volatiles, the zero-headspace extraction vessel described
TEDLAR is a registered trademark of Du Pont.2 ®
CD-ROM 1312 - 3 Revision 0
September 1994
in Step 4.2.1 is used for filtration. The device shall be capable of
supporting and keeping in place the glass fiber filter and be able to
withstand the pressure needed to accomplish separation (50 psig).
NOTE: When it is suspected that the glass fiber filter has been
ruptured, an in-line glass fiber filter may be used to filter the
material within the ZHE.
4.3.2 Filter Holder: When the sample is evaluated for other than
volatile analytes, a filter holder capable of supporting a glass fiber
filter and able to withstand the pressure needed to accomplish separation
may be used. Suitable filter holders range from simple vacuum units to
relatively complex systems capable of exerting pressures of up to 50 psig
or more. The type of filter holder used depends on the properties of the
material to be filtered (see Step 4.3.3). These devices shall have a
minimum internal volume of 300 mL and be equipped to accommodate a minimum
filter size of 47 mm (filter holders having an internal capacity of 1.5 L
or greater, and equipped to accommodate a 142 mm diameter filter, are
recommended). Vacuum filtration can only be used for wastes with low
solids content (<10 %) and for highly granular, liquid-containing wastes.
All other types of wastes should be filtered using positive pressure
filtration. Suitable filter holders known to EPA are listed in Table 4.
4.3.3 Materials of Construction: Extraction vessels and
filtration devices shall be made of inert materials which will not leach
or absorb sample components of interest. Glass, polytetrafluoroethylene
(PTFE), or type 316 stainless steel equipment may be used when evaluating
the mobility of both organic and inorganic components. Devices made of
high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polypropylene (PP), or polyvinyl
chloride (PVC) may be used only when evaluating the mobility of metals.
Borosilicate glass bottles are recommended for use over other types of
glass bottles, especially when inorganics are analytes of concern.
4.4 Filters: Filters shall be made of borosilicate glass fiber, shall
contain no binder materials, and shall have an effective pore size of 0.6 to
0.8-µm . Filters known to EPA which meet these specifications are identified in
Table 5. Pre-filters must not be used. When evaluating the mobility of metals,
filters shall be acid-washed prior to use by rinsing with 1N nitric acid followed
by three consecutive rinses with reagent water (a minimum of 1-L per rinse is
recommended). Glass fiber filters are fragile and should be handled with care.
4.5 pH Meters: The meter should be accurate to + 0.05 units at 25EC.
4.6 ZHE Extract Collection Devices: TEDLAR bags or glass, stainless®2
steel or PTFE gas-tight syringes are used to collect the initial liquid phase and
the final extract when using the ZHE device. These devices listed are
recommended for use under the following conditions:
CD-ROM 1312 - 4 Revision 0
September 1994
4.6.1 If a waste contains an aqueous liquid phase or if a waste
does not contain a significant amount of nonaqueous liquid (i.e., <1 % of
total waste), the TEDLAR bag or a 600 mL syringe should be used to collect®
and combine the initial liquid and solid extract.
4.6.2 If a waste contains a significant amount of nonaqueous
liquid in the initial liquid phase (i.e., >1 % of total waste), the
syringe or the TEDLAR bag may be used for both the initial solid/liquid®
separation and the final extract filtration. However, analysts should use
one or the other, not both.
4.6.3 If the waste contains no initial liquid phase (is 100 %
solid) or has no significant solid phase (is <0.5% solid) , either the
TEDLAR bag or the syringe may be used. If the syringe is used, discard®
the first 5 mL of liquid expressed from the device. The remaining
aliquots are used for analysis.
4.7 ZHE Extraction Fluid Transfer Devices: Any device capable of
transferring the extraction fluid into the ZHE without changing the nature of the
extraction fluid is acceptable (e.g., a positive displacement or peristaltic
pump, a gas-tight syringe, pressure filtration unit (see Step 4.3.2), or other
ZHE device).
4.8 Laboratory Balance: Any laboratory balance accurate to within +
0.01 grams may be used (all weight measurements are to be within + 0.1 grams).
4.9 Beaker or Erlenmeyer flask, glass, 500 mL.
4.10 Watchglass, appropriate diameter to cover beaker or Erlenmeyer
flask.
4.11 Magnetic stirrer.
5.0 REAGENTS
5.1 Reagent grade chemicals shall be used in all tests. Unless
otherwise indicated, it is intended that all reagents shall conform to the
specifications of the Committee on Analytical Reagents of the American Chemical
Society, where such specifications are available. Other grades may be used,
provided it is first ascertained that the reagent is of sufficiently high purity
to permit its use without lessening the accuracy of the determination.
5.2 Reagent Water. Reagent water is defined as water in which an
interferant is not observed at or above the method's detection limit of the
analyte(s) of interest. For nonvolatile extractions, ASTM Type II water or
equivalent meets the definition of reagent water. For volatile extractions, it
is recommended that reagent water be generated by any of the following methods.
Reagent water should be monitored periodically for impurities.
5.2.1 Reagent water for volatile extractions may be generated
by passing tap water through a carbon filter bed containing about 500
grams of activated carbon (Calgon Corp., Filtrasorb-300 or equivalent).
CD-ROM 1312 - 5 Revision 0
September 1994
5.2.2 A water purification system (Millipore Super-Q or
equivalent) may also be used to generate reagent water for volatile
extractions.
5.2.3 Reagent water for volatile extractions may also be prepared
by boiling water for 15 minutes. Subsequently, while maintaining the
water temperature at 90 + 5 degrees C, bubble a contaminant-free inert gas
(e.g. nitrogen) through the water for 1 hour. While still hot, transfer
the water to a narrow mouth screw-cap bottle under zero-headspace and seal
with a Teflon-lined septum and cap.
5.3 Sulfuric acid/nitric acid (60/40 weight percent mixture) H SO /HNO .2 4 3
Cautiously mix 60 g of concentrated sulfuric acid with 40 g of concentrated
nitric acid. If preferred, a more dilute H SO /HNO acid mixture may be prepared243
and used in steps 5.4.1 and 5.4.2 making it easier to adjust the pH of the
extraction fluids.
5.4 Extraction fluids.
5.4.1 Extraction fluid #1: This fluid is made by adding the
60/40 weight percent mixture of sulfuric and nitric acids (or a suitable
dilution) to reagent water (Step 5.2) until the pH is 4.20 + 0.05. The
fluid is used to determine the leachability of soil from a site that is
east of the Mississippi River, and the leachability of wastes and
wastewaters.
NOTE:Solutions are unbuffered and exact pH may not be attained.
5.4.2 Extraction fluid #2: This fluid is made by adding the
60/40 weight percent mixture of sulfuric and nitric acids (or a suitable
dilution) to reagent water (Step 5.2) until the pH is 5.00 + 0.05. The
fluid is used to determine the leachability of soil from a site that is
west of the Mississippi River.
5.4.3 Extraction fluid #3: This fluid is reagent water (Step
5.2) and is used to determine cyanide and volatiles leachability.
NOTE: These extraction fluids should be monitored frequently for
impurities. The pH should be checked prior to use to ensure that
these fluids are made up accurately. If impurities are found or
the pH is not within the above specifications, the fluid shall be
discarded and fresh extraction fluid prepared.
5.5 Analytical standards shall be prepared according to the appropriate
analytical method.
6.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION, PRESERVATION, AND HANDLING
6.1 All samples shall be collected using an appropriate sampling plan.
6.2 There may be requirements on the minimal size of the field sample
depending upon the physical state or states of the waste and the analytes of
concern. An aliquot is needed for the preliminary evaluations of the percent
CD-ROM 1312 - 6 Revision 0
September 1994
solids and the particle size. An aliquot may be needed to conduct the
nonvolatile analyte extraction procedure. If volatile organics are of concern,
another aliquot may be needed. Quality control measures may require additional
aliquots. Further, it is always wise to collect more sample just in case
something goes wrong with the initial attempt to conduct the test.
6.3 Preservatives shall not be added to samples before extraction.
6.4 Samples may be refrigerated unless refrigeration results in
irreversible physical change to the waste. If precipitation occurs, the entire
sample (including precipitate) should be extracted.
6.5 When the sample is to be evaluated for volatile analytes, care
shall be taken to minimize the loss of volatiles. Samples shall be collected and
stored in a manner intended to prevent the loss of volatile analytes (e.g.,
samples should be collected in Teflon-lined septum capped vials and stored at
4EC. Samples should be opened only immediately prior to extraction).
6.6 1312 extracts should be prepared for analysis and analyzed as soon
as possible following extraction. Extracts or portions of extracts for metallic
analyte determinations must be acidified with nitric acid to a pH < 2, unless
precipitation occurs (see Step 7.2.14 if precipitation occurs). Extracts should
be preserved for other analytes according to the guidance given in the individual
analysis methods. Extracts or portions of extracts for organic analyte
determinations shall not be allowed to come into contact with the atmosphere
(i.e., no headspace) to prevent losses. See Step 8.0 (Quality Control) for
acceptable sample and extract holding times.
7.0 PROCEDURE
7.1 Preliminary Evaluations
Perform preliminary 1312 evaluations on a minimum 100 gram aliquot of
sample. This aliquot may not actually undergo 1312 extraction. These
preliminary evaluations include: (1) determination of the percent solids (Step
7.1.1); (2) determination of whether the waste contains insignificant solids and
is, therefore, its own extract after filtration (Step 7.1.2); and (3)
determination of whether the solid portion of the waste requires particle size
reduction (Step 7.1.3).
7.1.1 Preliminary determination of percent solids: Percent
solids is defined as that fraction of a waste sample (as a percentage of
the total sample) from which no liquid may be forced out by an applied
pressure, as described below.
7.1.1.1 If the sample will obviously yield no free
liquid when subjected to pressure filtration (i.e., is 100% solid),
weigh out a representative subsample (100 g minimum) and proceed
to Step 7.1.3.
7.1.1.2 If the sample is liquid or multiphasic,
liquid/solid separation to make a preliminary determination of
percent solids is required. This involves the filtration device
CD-ROM 1312 - 7 Revision 0
September 1994
discussed in Step 4.3.2, and is outlined in Steps 7.1.1.3 through
7.1.1.9.
7.1.1.3 Pre-weigh the filter and the container that will
receive the filtrate.
7.1.1.4 Assemble filter holder and filter following the
manufacturer's instructions. Place the filter on the support
screen and secure.
7.1.1.5 Weigh out a subsample of the waste (100 gram
minimum) and record the weight.
7.1.1.6 Allow slurries to stand to permit the solid phase
to settle. Samples that settle slowly may be centrifuged prior to
filtration. Centrifugation is to be used only as an aid to
filtration. If used, the liquid should be decanted and filtered
followed by filtration of the solid portion of the waste through
the same filtration system.
7.1.1.7 Quantitatively transfer the sample to the filter
holder (liquid and solid phases). Spread the sample evenly over
the surface of the filter. If filtration of the waste at 4EC
reduces the amount of expressed liquid over what would be expressed
at room temperature, then allow the sample to warm up to room
temperature in the device before filtering.
Gradually apply vacuum or gentle pressure of 1-10 psig,
until air or pressurizing gas moves through the filter. If this
point is not reached under 10 psig, and if no additional liquid has
passed through the filter in any 2-minute interval, slowly increase
the pressure in 10 psig increments to a maximum of 50 psig. After
each incremental increase of 10 psig, if the pressurizing gas has
not moved through the filter, and if no additional liquid has
passed through the filter in any 2-minute interval, proceed to the
next 10-psig increment. When the pressurizing gas begins to move
through the filter, or when liquid flow has ceased at 50 psig
(i.e., filtration does not result in any additional filtrate within
any 2-minute period), stop the filtration.
NOTE: If sample material (>1 % of original sample weight) has
obviously adhered to the container used to transfer the sample to
the filtration apparatus, determine the weight of this residue and
subtract it from the sample weight determined in Step 7.1.1.5 to
determine the weight of the sample that will be filtered.
NOTE: Instantaneous application of high pressure can degrade the
glass fiber filter and may cause premature plugging.
7.1.1.8 The material in the filter holder is defined as
the solid phase of the sample, and the filtrate is defined as the
liquid phase.
CD-ROM 1312 - 8 Revision 0
September 1994
NOTE: Some samples, such as oily wastes and some paint wastes,
will obviously contain some material that appears to be a liquid,
but even after applying vacuum or pressure filtration, as outlined
in Step 7.1.1.7, this material may not filter. If this is the
case, the material within the filtration device is defined as a
solid. Do not replace the original filter with a fresh filter
under any circumstances. Use only one filter.
7.1.1.9 Determine the weight of the liquid phase by
subtracting the weight of the filtrate container (see Step 7.1.1.3)
from the total weight of the filtrate-filled container. Determine
the weight of the solid phase of the sample by subtracting the
weight of the liquid phase from the weight of the total sample, as
determined in Step 7.1.1.5 or 7.1.1.7.
Record the weight of the liquid and solid phases.
Calculate the percent solids as follows:
Weight of solid (Step 7.1.1.9)
Percent solids = x 100
Total weight of waste (Step 7.1.1.5 or 7.1.1.7)
7.1.2 If the percent solids determined in Step 7.1.1.9 is equal
to or greater than 0.5%, then proceed either to Step 7.1.3 to determine
whether the solid material requires particle size reduction or to Step
7.1.2.1 if it is noticed that a small amount of the filtrate is entrained
in wetting of the filter. If the percent solids determined in Step
7.1.1.9 is less than 0.5%, then proceed to Step 7.2.9 if the nonvolatile
1312 analysis is to be performed, and to Step 7.3 with a fresh portion of
the waste if the volatile 1312 analysis is to be performed.
7.1.2.1 Remove the solid phase and filter from the
filtration apparatus.
7.1.2.2 Dry the filter and solid phase at 100 + 20EC
until two successive weighings yield the same value within + 1 %.
Record the final weight.
Caution: The drying oven should be vented to a hood or other
appropriate device to eliminate the possibility of fumes from the
sample escaping into the laboratory. Care should be taken to
ensure that the sample will not flash or violently react upon
heating.
7.1.2.3 Calculate the percent dry solids as follows:

Percent (Weight of dry sample + filter) - tared weight of filter
dry solids = x 100
Initial weight of sample (Step 7.1.1.5 or 7.1.1.7)
CD-ROM 1312 - 9 Revision 0
September 1994
7.1.2.4 If the percent dry solids is less than 0.5%,
then proceed to Step 7.2.9 if the nonvolatile 1312 analysis is to
be performed, and to Step 7.3 if the volatile 1312 analysis is to
be performed. If the percent dry solids is greater than or equal
to 0.5%, and if the nonvolatile 1312 analysis is to be performed,
return to the beginning of this Step (7.1) and, with a fresh
portion of sample, determine whether particle size reduction is
necessary (Step 7.1.3).
7.1.3 Determination of whether the sample requires particle-size
reduction (particle-size is reduced during this step): Using the solid
portion of the sample, evaluate the solid for particle size. Particle-
size reduction is required, unless the solid has a surface area per gram
of material equal to or greater than 3.1 cm , or is smaller than 1 cm in2
its narrowest dimension (i.e., is capable of passing through a 9.5 mm
(0.375 inch) standard sieve). If the surface area is smaller or the
particle size larger than described above, prepare the solid portion of
the sample for extraction by crushing, cutting, or grinding the waste to
a surface area or particle size as described above. If the solids are
prepared for organic volatiles extraction, special precautions must be
taken (see Step 7.3.6).
NOTE: Surface area criteria are meant for filamentous (e.g.,
paper, cloth, and similar) waste materials. Actual measurement of
surface area is not required, nor is it recommended. For materials
that do not obviously meet the criteria, sample-specific methods
would need to be developed and employed to measure the surface
area. Such methodology is currently not available.
7.1.4 Determination of appropriate extraction fluid:
7.1.4.1 For soils, if the sample is from a site that is
east of the Mississippi River, extraction fluid #1 should be used.
If the sample is from a site that is west of the Mississippi River,
extraction fluid #2 should be used.
7.1.4.2 For wastes and wastewater, extraction fluid #1
should be used.
7.1.4.3 For cyanide-containing wastes and/or soils,
extraction fluid #3 (reagent water) must be used because leaching
of cyanide-containing samples under acidic conditions may result
in the formation of hydrogen cyanide gas.
7.1.5 If the aliquot of the sample used for the preliminary
evaluation (Steps 7.1.1 - 7.1.4) was determined to be 100% solid at Step
7.1.1.1, then it can be used for the Step 7.2 extraction (assuming at
least 100 grams remain), and the Step 7.3 extraction (assuming at least 25
grams remain). If the aliquot was subjected to the procedure in Step
7.1.1.7, then another aliquot shall be used for the volatile extraction
procedure in Step 7.3. The aliquot of the waste subjected to the
procedure in Step 7.1.1.7 might be appropriate for use for the Step 7.2
extraction if an adequate amount of solid (as determined by Step 7.1.1.9)
CD-ROM 1312 - 10 Revision 0
September 1994
was obtained. The amount of solid necessary is dependent upon whether a
sufficient amount of extract will be produced to support the analyses. If
an adequate amount of solid remains, proceed to Step 7.2.10 of the
nonvolatile 1312 extraction.
7.2 Procedure When Volatiles Are Not Involved
A minimum sample size of 100 grams (solid and liquid phases) is
recommended. In some cases, a larger sample size may be appropriate, depending
on the solids content of the waste sample (percent solids, See Step 7.1.1),
whether the initial liquid phase of the waste will be miscible with the aqueous
extract of the solid, and whether inorganics, semivolatile organics, pesticides,
and herbicides are all analytes of concern. Enough solids should be generated
for extraction such that the volume of 1312 extract will be sufficient to support
all of the analyses required. If the amount of extract generated by a single
1312 extraction will not be sufficient to perform all of the analyses, more than
one extraction may be performed and the extracts from each combined and aliquoted
for analysis.
7.2.1 If the sample will obviously yield no liquid when subjected
to pressure filtration (i.e., is 100 % solid, see Step 7.1.1), weigh out
a subsample of the sample (100 gram minimum) and proceed to Step 7.2.9.
7.2.2 If the sample is liquid or multiphasic, liquid/solid
separation is required. This involves the filtration device described in
Step 4.3.2 and is outlined in Steps 7.2.3 to 7.2.8.
7.2.3 Pre-weigh the container that will receive the filtrate.
7.2.4 Assemble the filter holder and filter following the
manufacturer's instructions. Place the filter on the support screen and
secure. Acid wash the filter if evaluating the mobility of metals (see
Step 4.4).
NOTE: Acid washed filters may be used for all nonvolatile
extractions even when metals are not of concern.
7.2.5 Weigh out a subsample of the sample (100 gram minimum) and
record the weight. If the waste contains <0.5 % dry solids (Step 7.1.2),
the liquid portion of the waste, after filtration, is defined as the 1312
extract. Therefore, enough of the sample should be filtered so that the
amount of filtered liquid will support all of the analyses required of the
1312 extract. For wastes containing >0.5 % dry solids (Steps 7.1.1 or
7.1.2), use the percent solids information obtained in Step 7.1.1 to
determine the optimum sample size (100 gram minimum) for filtration.
Enough solids should be generated by filtration to support the analyses to
be performed on the 1312 extract.
7.2.6 Allow slurries to stand to permit the solid phase to settle.
Samples that settle slowly may be centrifuged prior to filtration. Use
centrifugation only as an aid to filtration. If the sample is
centrifuged, the liquid should be decanted and filtered followed by
CD-ROM 1312 - 11 Revision 0
September 1994
filtration of the solid portion of the waste through the same filtration
system.
7.2.7 Quantitatively transfer the sample (liquid and solid phases)
to the filter holder (see Step 4.3.2). Spread the waste sample evenly
over the surface of the filter. If filtration of the waste at 4EC reduces
the amount of expressed liquid over what would be expressed at room
temperature, then allow the sample to warm up to room temperature in the
device before filtering.
Gradually apply vacuum or gentle pressure of 1-10 psig, until air
or pressurizing gas moves through the filter. If this point if not
reached under 10 psig, and if no additional liquid has passed through the
filter in any 2-minute interval, slowly increase the pressure in 10-psig
increments to maximum of 50 psig. After each incremental increase of 10
psig, if the pressurizing gas has not moved through the filter, and if no
additional liquid has passed through the filter in any 2-minute interval,
proceed to the next 10-psig increment. When the pressurizing gas begins
to move through the filter, or when the liquid flow has ceased at 50 psig
(i.e., filtration does not result in any additional filtrate within a
2-minute period), stop the filtration.
NOTE: If waste material (>1 % of the original sample weight) has
obviously adhered to the container used to transfer the sample to
the filtration apparatus, determine the weight of this residue and
subtract it from the sample weight determined in Step 7.2.5, to
determine the weight of the waste sample that will be filtered.
NOTE:Instantaneous application of high pressure can degrade the
glass fiber filter and may cause premature plugging.
7.2.8 The material in the filter holder is defined as the solid
phase of the sample, and the filtrate is defined as the liquid phase.
Weigh the filtrate. The liquid phase may now be either analyzed (see Step
7.2.12) or stored at 4EC until time of analysis.
NOTE: Some wastes, such as oily wastes and some paint wastes, will
obviously contain some material which appears to be a liquid. Even
after applying vacuum or pressure filtration, as outlined in Step
7.2.7, this material may not filter. If this is the case, the
material within the filtration device is defined as a solid, and
is carried through the extraction as a solid. Do not replace the
original filter with a fresh filter under any circumstances. Use
only one filter.
7.2.9 If the sample contains <0.5% dry solids (see Step 7.1.2),
proceed to Step 7.2.13. If the sample contains >0.5 % dry solids (see
Step 7.1.1 or 7.1.2), and if particle-size reduction of the solid was
needed in Step 7.1.3, proceed to Step 7.2.10. If the sample as received
passes a 9.5 mm sieve, quantitatively transfer the solid material into the
extractor bottle along with the filter used to separate the initial liquid
from the solid phase, and proceed to Step 7.2.11.
CD-ROM 1312 - 12 Revision 0
September 1994
7.2.10 Prepare the solid portion of the sample for extraction by
crushing, cutting, or grinding the waste to a surface area or particle-
size as described in Step 7.1.3. When the surface area or particle-size
has been appropriately altered, quantitatively transfer the solid material
into an extractor bottle. Include the filter used to separate the initial
liquid from the solid phase.
NOTE: Sieving of the waste is not normally required. Surface area
requirements are meant for filamentous (e.g., paper, cloth) and
similar waste materials. Actual measurement of surface area is not
recommended. If sieving is necessary, a Teflon-coated sieve should
be used to avoid contamination of the sample.

7.2.11 Determine the amount of extraction fluid to add to the
extractor vessel as follows:
20 x % solids (Step 7.1.1) x weight of waste
filtered (Step 7.2.5 or 7.2.7)
Weight of =
extraction fluid
100
Slowly add this amount of appropriate extraction fluid (see Step
7.1.4) to the extractor vessel. Close the extractor bottle tightly (it is
recommended that Teflon tape be used to ensure a tight seal), secure in
rotary extractor device, and rotate at 30 + 2 rpm for 18 + 2 hours.
Ambient temperature (i.e., temperature of room in which extraction takes
place) shall be maintained at 23 + 2EC during the extraction period.
NOTE: As agitation continues, pressure may build up within the
extractor bottle for some types of sample (e.g., limed or calcium
carbonate-containing sample may evolve gases such as carbon
dioxide). To relieve excess pressure, the extractor bottle may be
periodically opened (e.g., after 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 1
hour) and vented into a hood.
7.2.12 Following the 18 + 2 hour extraction, separate the material
in the extractor vessel into its component liquid and solid phases by
filtering through a new glass fiber filter, as outlined in Step 7.2.7.
For final filtration of the 1312 extract, the glass fiber filter may be
changed, if necessary, to facilitate filtration. Filter(s) shall be
acid-washed (see Step 4.4) if evaluating the mobility of metals.
7.2.13 Prepare the 1312 extract as follows:
7.2.13.1 If the sample contained no initial liquid phase,
the filtered liquid material obtained from Step 7.2.12 is defined
as the 1312 extract. Proceed to Step 7.2.14.
7.2.13.2 If compatible (e.g., multiple phases will not
result on combination), combine the filtered liquid resulting from
Step 7.2.12 with the initial liquid phase of the sample obtained
CD-ROM 1312 - 13 Revision 0
September 1994
in Step 7.2.7. This combined liquid is defined as the 1312
extract. Proceed to Step 7.2.14.
7.2.13.3 If the initial liquid phase of the waste, as
obtained from Step 7.2.7, is not or may not be compatible with the
filtered liquid resulting from Step 7.2.12, do not combine these
liquids. Analyze these liquids, collectively defined as the 1312
extract, and combine the results mathematically, as described in
Step 7.2.14.
7.2.14 Following collection of the 1312 extract, the pH of the
extract should be recorded. Immediately aliquot and preserve the extract
for analysis. Metals aliquots must be acidified with nitric acid to pH <
2. If precipitation is observed upon addition of nitric acid to a small
aliquot of the extract, then the remaining portion of the extract for
metals analyses shall not be acidified and the extract shall be analyzed
as soon as possible. All other aliquots must be stored under
refrigeration (4EC) until analyzed. The 1312 extract shall be prepared
and analyzed according to appropriate analytical methods. 1312 extracts
to be analyzed for metals shall be acid digested except in those instances
where digestion causes loss of metallic analytes. If an analysis of the
undigested extract shows that the concentration of any regulated metallic
analyte exceeds the regulatory level, then the waste is hazardous and
digestion of the extract is not necessary. However, data on undigested
extracts alone cannot be used to demonstrate that the waste is not
hazardous. If the individual phases are to be analyzed separately,
determine the volume of the individual phases (to + 0.5 %), conduct the
appropriate analyses, and combine the results mathematically by using a
simple volume-weighted average:
(V ) (C ) + (V ) (C )1 1 2 2
Final Analyte Concentration =
V + V1 2
where:
V = The volume of the first phase (L).1
C = The concentration of the analyte of concern in the first phase (mg/L).1
V = The volume of the second phase (L).2
C = The concentration of the analyte of concern in the second phase2
(mg/L).
7.2.15 Compare the analyte concentrations in the 1312 extract with
the levels identified in the appropriate regulations. Refer to Section
8.0 for quality assurance requirements.
7.3 Procedure When Volatiles Are Involved
Use the ZHE device to obtain 1312 extract for analysis of volatile
compounds only. Extract resulting from the use of the ZHE shall not be used to
evaluate the mobility of non-volatile analytes (e.g., metals, pesticides, etc.).
CD-ROM 1312 - 14 Revision 0
September 1994
The ZHE device has approximately a 500 mL internal capacity. The ZHE can
thus accommodate a maximum of 25 grams of solid (defined as that fraction of a
sample from which no additional liquid may be forced out by an applied pressure
of 50 psig), due to the need to add an amount of extraction fluid equal to 20
times the weight of the solid phase.
Charge the ZHE with sample only once and do not open the device until the
final extract (of the solid) has been collected. Repeated filling of the ZHE to
obtain 25 grams of solid is not permitted.
Do not allow the sample, the initial liquid phase, or the extract to be
exposed to the atmosphere for any more time than is absolutely necessary. Any
manipulation of these materials should be done when cold (4EC) to minimize loss
of volatiles.
7.3.1 Pre-weigh the (evacuated) filtrate collection container
(see Step 4.6) and set aside. If using a TEDLAR bag, express all liquid®
from the ZHE device into the bag, whether for the initial or final
liquid/solid separation, and take an aliquot from the liquid in the bag
for analysis. The containers listed in Step 4.6 are recommended for use
under the conditions stated in Steps 4.6.1-4.6.3.
7.3.2 Place the ZHE piston within the body of the ZHE (it may be
helpful first to moisten the piston O-rings slightly with extraction
fluid). Adjust the piston within the ZHE body to a height that will
minimize the distance the piston will have to move once the ZHE is charged
with sample (based upon sample size requirements determined from Step 7.3,
Step 7.1.1 and/or 7.1.2). Secure the gas inlet/outlet flange (bottom
flange) onto the ZHE body in accordance with the manufacturer's
instructions. Secure the glass fiber filter between the support screens
and set aside. Set liquid inlet/outlet flange (top flange) aside.
7.3.3 If the sample is 100% solid (see Step 7.1.1), weigh out
a subsample (25 gram maximum) of the waste, record weight, and proceed to
Step 7.3.5.
7.3.4 If the sample contains <0.5% dry solids (Step 7.1.2), the
liquid portion of waste, after filtration, is defined as the 1312 extract.
Filter enough of the sample so that the amount of filtered liquid will
support all of the volatile analyses required. For samples containing
>0.5% dry solids (Steps 7.1.1 and/or 7.1.2), use the percent solids
information obtained in Step 7.1.1 to determine the optimum sample size to
charge into the ZHE. The recommended sample size is as follows:
7.3.4.1 For samples containing <5% solids (see Step
7.1.1), weigh out a 500 gram subsample of waste and record the
weight.
7.3.4.2 For wastes containing >5% solids (see Step
7.1.1), determine the amount of waste to charge into the ZHE as
follows:

CD-ROM 1312 - 15 Revision 0
September 1994
25
Weight of waste to charge ZHE = x 100
percent solids (Step 7.1.1)
Weigh out a subsample of the waste of the appropriate size and
record the weight.
7.3.5 If particle-size reduction of the solid portion of the
sample was required in Step 7.1.3, proceed to Step 7.3.6. If particle-
size reduction was not required in Step 7.1.3, proceed to Step 7.3.7.
7.3.6 Prepare the sample for extraction by crushing, cutting, or
grinding the solid portion of the waste to a surface area or particle size
as described in Step 7.1.3.1. Wastes and appropriate reduction equipment
should be refrigerated, if possible, to 4EC prior to particle-size
reduction. The means used to effect particle-size reduction must not
generate heat in and of itself. If reduction of the solid phase of the
waste is necessary, exposure of the waste to the atmosphere should be
avoided to the extent possible.
NOTE: Sieving of the waste is not recommended due to the
possibility that volatiles may be lost. The use of an
appropriately graduated ruler is recommended as an acceptable
alternative. Surface area requirements are meant for filamentous
(e.g., paper, cloth) and similar waste materials. Actual
measurement of surface area is not recommended.
When the surface area or particle-size has been appropriately
altered, proceed to Step 7.3.7.
7.3.7 Waste slurries need not be allowed to stand to permit the
solid phase to settle. Do not centrifuge samples prior to filtration.
7.3.8 Quantitatively transfer the entire sample (liquid and solid
phases) quickly to the ZHE. Secure the filter and support screens into
the top flange of the device and secure the top flange to the ZHE body in
accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Tighten all ZHE fittings
and place the device in the vertical position (gas inlet/outlet flange on
the bottom). Do not attach the extraction collection device to the top
plate.
Note: If sample material (>1% of original sample weight) has
obviously adhered to the container used to transfer the sample to
the ZHE, determine the weight of this residue and subtract it from
the sample weight determined in Step 7.3.4 to determine the weight
of the waste sample that will be filtered.
Attach a gas line to the gas inlet/outlet valve (bottom flange)
and, with the liquid inlet/outlet valve (top flange) open, begin applying
gentle pressure of 1-10 psig (or more if necessary) to force all headspace
slowly out of the ZHE device into a hood. At the first appearance of
liquid from the liquid inlet/outlet valve, quickly close the valve and
discontinue pressure. If filtration of the waste at 4EC reduces the
CD-ROM 1312 - 16 Revision 0
September 1994
amount of expressed liquid over what would be expressed at room
temperature, then allow the sample to warm up to room temperature in the
device before filtering. If the waste is 100 % solid (see Step 7.1.1),
slowly increase the pressure to a maximum of 50 psig to force most of the
headspace out of the device and proceed to Step 7.3.12.
7.3.9 Attach the evacuated pre-weighed filtrate collection
container to the liquid inlet/outlet valve and open the valve. Begin
applying gentle pressure of 1-10 psig to force the liquid phase of the
sample into the filtrate collection container. If no additional liquid
has passed through the filter in any 2-minute interval, slowly increase
the pressure in 10-psig increments to a maximum of 50 psig. After each
incremental increase of 10 psig, if no additional liquid has passed
through the filter in any 2-minute interval, proceed to the next 10-psig
increment. When liquid flow has ceased such that continued pressure
filtration at 50 psig does not result in any additional filtrate within a
2-minute period, stop the filtration. Close the liquid inlet/outlet
valve, discontinue pressure to the piston, and disconnect and weigh the
filtrate collection container.
NOTE: Instantaneous application of high pressure can degrade the
glass fiber filter and may cause premature plugging.
7.3.10 The material in the ZHE is defined as the solid phase of
the sample and the filtrate is defined as the liquid phase.
NOTE: Some samples, such as oily wastes and some paint wastes,
will obviously contain some material which appears to be a liquid.
Even after applying pressure filtration, this material will not
filter. If this is the case, the material within the filtration
device is defined as a solid, and is carried through the 1312
extraction as a solid.
If the original waste contained <0.5 % dry solids (see Step 7.1.2),
this filtrate is defined as the 1312 extract and is analyzed directly.
Proceed to Step 7.3.15.
7.3.11 The liquid phase may now be either analyzed immediately
(see Steps 7.3.13 through 7.3.15) or stored at 4EC under minimal headspace
conditions until time of analysis. Determine the weight of extraction
fluid #3 to add to the ZHE as follows:
20 x % solids (Step 7.1.1) x weight
of waste filtered (Step 7.3.4 or 7.3.8)
Weight of extraction fluid =
100
7.3.12 The following steps detail how to add the appropriate
amount of extraction fluid to the solid material within the ZHE and
agitation of the ZHE vessel. Extraction fluid #3 is used in all cases
(see Step 5.4.3).
CD-ROM 1312 - 17 Revision 0
September 1994
7.3.12.1 With the ZHE in the vertical position, attach a
line from the extraction fluid reservoir to the liquid inlet/outlet
valve. The line used shall contain fresh extraction fluid and
should be preflushed with fluid to eliminate any air pockets in the
line. Release gas pressure on the ZHE piston (from the gas
inlet/outlet valve), open the liquid inlet/outlet valve, and begin
transferring extraction fluid (by pumping or similar means) into
the ZHE. Continue pumping extraction fluid into the ZHE until the
appropriate amount of fluid has been introduced into the device.
7.3.12.2 After the extraction fluid has been added,
immediately close the liquid inlet/outlet valve and disconnect the
extraction fluid line. Check the ZHE to ensure that all valves are
in their closed positions. Manually rotate the device in an
end-over-end fashion 2 or 3 times. Reposition the ZHE in the
vertical position with the liquid inlet/outlet valve on top.
Pressurize the ZHE to 5-10 psig (if necessary) and slowly open the
liquid inlet/outlet valve to bleed out any headspace (into a hood)
that may have been introduced due to the addition of extraction
fluid. This bleeding shall be done quickly and shall be stopped
at the first appearance of liquid from the valve. Re-pressurize
the ZHE with 5-10 psig and check all ZHE fittings to ensure that
they are closed.
7.3.12.3 Place the ZHE in the rotary extractor apparatus
(if it is not already there) and rotate at 30 + 2 rpm for 18 + 2
hours. Ambient temperature (i.e., temperature of room in which
extraction occurs) shall be maintained at 23 + 2EC during
agitation.
7.3.13 Following the 18 + 2 hour agitation period, check the
pressure behind the ZHE piston by quickly opening and closing the gas
inlet/outlet valve and noting the escape of gas. If the pressure has not
been maintained (i.e., no gas release observed), the ZHE is leaking.
Check the ZHE for leaking as specified in Step 4.2.1, and perform the
extraction again with a new sample of waste. If the pressure within the
device has been maintained, the material in the extractor vessel is once
again separated into its component liquid and solid phases. If the waste
contained an initial liquid phase, the liquid may be filtered directly
into the same filtrate collection container (i.e., TEDLAR bag) holding the®
initial liquid phase of the waste. A separate filtrate collection
container must be used if combining would create multiple phases, or there
is not enough volume left within the filtrate collection container.
Filter through the glass fiber filter, using the ZHE device as discussed
in Step 7.3.9. All extracts shall be filtered and collected if the TEDLAR®
bag is used, if the extract is multiphasic, or if the waste contained an
initial liquid phase (see Steps 4.6 and 7.3.1).
NOTE: An in-line glass fiber filter may be used to filter the
material within the ZHE if it is suspected that the glass fiber
filter has been ruptured
CD-ROM 1312 - 18 Revision 0
September 1994
7.3.14 If the original sample contained no initial liquid phase,
the filtered liquid material obtained from Step 7.3.13 is defined as the
1312 extract. If the sample contained an initial liquid phase, the
filtered liquid material obtained from Step 7.3.13 and the initial liquid
phase (Step 7.3.9) are collectively defined as the 1312 extract.
7.3.15 Following collection of the 1312 extract, immediately
prepare the extract for analysis and store with minimal headspace at 4EC
until analyzed. Analyze the 1312 extract according to the appropriate
analytical methods. If the individual phases are to be analyzed
separately (i.e., are not miscible), determine the volume of the
individual phases (to 0.5%), conduct the appropriate analyses, and combine
the results mathematically by using a simple volume- weighted average:
(V ) (C ) + (V ) (C ) 1 1 2 2
Final Analyte =
Concentration V + V1 2
where:
V = The volume of the first phases (L).1
C = The concentration of the analyte of concern in the first phase (mg/L).1
V = The volume of the second phase (L).2
C = The concentration of the analyte of concern in the second phase2
(mg/L).
7.3.16 Compare the analyte concentrations in the 1312 extract with
the levels identified in the appropriate regulations. Refer to Step 8.0
for quality assurance requirements.
8.0 QUALITY CONTROL
8.1 A minimum of one blank (using the same extraction fluid as used for
the samples) for every 20 extractions that have been conducted in an extraction
vessel. Refer to Chapter One for additional quality control protocols.
8.2 A matrix spike shall be performed for each waste type (e.g.,
wastewater treatment sludge, contaminated soil, etc.) unless the result exceeds
the regulatory level and the data is being used solely to demonstrate that the
waste property exceeds the regulatory level. A minimum of one matrix spike must
be analyzed for each analytical batch. As a minimum, follow the matrix spike
addition guidance provided in each analytical method.
8.2.1 Matrix spikes are to be added after filtration of the 1312
extract and before preservation. Matrix spikes should not be added prior
to 1312 extraction of the sample.
8.2.2 In most cases, matrix spike levels should be added at a
concentration equivalent to the corresponding regulatory level. If the
analyte concentration is less than one half the regulatory level, the
CD-ROM 1312 - 19 Revision 0
September 1994
spike concentration may be as low as one half of the analyte
concentration, but may not be less than five times the method detection
limit. In order to avoid differences in matrix effects, the matrix spikes
must be added to the same nominal volume of 1312 extract as that which was
analyzed for the unspiked sample.
8.2.3 The purpose of the matrix spike is to monitor the
performance of the analytical methods used, and to determine whether
matrix interferences exist. Use of other internal calibration methods,
modification of the analytical methods, or use of alternate analytical
methods may be needed to accurately measure the analyte concentration in
the 1312 extract when the recovery of the matrix spike is below the
expected analytical method performance.
8.2.4 Matrix spike recoveries are calculated by the following
formula:
%R (% Recovery) = 100 (X - X ) / Ksu
where:
X = measured value for the spiked samples
X = measured value for the unspiked sample, andu
K = known value of the spike in the sample.
8.3 All quality control measures described in the appropriate analytical
methods shall be followed.
8.4 The use of internal calibration quantitation methods shall be
employed for a metallic contaminant if: (1) Recovery of the contaminant from the
1312 extract is not at least 50% and the concentration does not exceed the
appropriate regulatory level, and (2) The concentration of the contaminant
measured in the extract is within 20% of the appropriate regulatory level.
8.4.1.The method of standard additions shall be employed as the
internal calibration quantitation method for each metallic contaminant.
8.4.2 The method of standard additions requires preparing
calibration standards in the sample matrix rather than reagent water or
blank solution. It requires taking four identical aliquots of the
solution and adding known amounts of standard to three of these aliquots.
The forth aliquot is the unknown. Preferably, the first addition should
be prepared so that the resulting concentration is approximately 50% of
the expected concentration of the sample. The second and third additions
should be prepared so that the concentrations are approximately 100% and
150% of the expected concentration of the sample. All four aliquots are
maintained at the same final volume by adding reagent water or a blank
solution, and may need dilution adjustment to maintain the signals in the
linear range of the instrument technique. All four aliquots are analyzed.
8.4.3 Prepare a plot, or subject data to linear regression, of
instrument signals or external-calibration-derived concentrations as the
dependant variable (y-axis) versus concentrations of the additions of
standards as the independent variable (x-axis). Solve for the intercept
CD-ROM 1312 - 20 Revision 0
September 1994
of the abscissa (the independent variable, x-axis) which is the concentra-
tion in the unknown.
8.4.4 Alternately, subtract the instrumental signal or external-
calibration-derived concentration of the unknown (unspiked) sample from
the instrumental signals or external-calibration-derived concentrations of
the standard additions. Plot or subject to linear regression of the
corrected instrument signals or external-calibration-derived concentra-
tions as the dependant variable versus the independent variable. Derive
concentrations for the unknowns using the internal calibration curve as if
it were an external calibration curve.
8.5 Samples must undergo 1312 extraction within the following time
periods:
SAMPLE MAXIMUM HOLDING TIMES (days)
From: Field From: 1312 From: Prepara- Total
Collec- extrac- tive Elapsed
tion tion extrac- Time
To: 1312 To: Prepara-
extrac- tive To: Determi-
tion extrac- native
tion analysis
tion
Volatiles 14 NA 14 28
Semi-
volatiles 14 7 40 61
Mercury 28 NA 28 56
Metals,
except 180 NA 180 360
mercury
NA = Not Applicable
If sample holding times are exceeded, the values obtained will be considered
minimal concentrations. Exceeding the holding time is not acceptable in
establishing that a waste does not exceed the regulatory level. Exceeding the
holding time will not invalidate characterization if the waste exceeds the
regulatory level.
9.0 METHOD PERFORMANCE
9.1 Precision results for semi-volatiles and metals: An eastern soil
with high organic content and a western soil with low organic content were used
for the semi-volatile and metal leaching experiments. Both types of soil were
analyzed prior to contaminant spiking. The results are shown in Table 6. The
concentration of contaminants leached from the soils were reproducible, as shown
CD-ROM 1312 - 21 Revision 0
September 1994
by the moderate relative standard deviations (RSDs) of the recoveries (averaging
29% for the compounds and elements analyzed).
9.2 Precision results for volatiles: Four different soils were spiked
and tested for the extraction of volatiles. Soils One and Two were from western
and eastern Superfund sites. Soils Three and Four were mixtures of a western
soil with low organic content and two different municipal sludges. The results
are shown in Table 7. Extract concentrations of volatile organics from the
eastern soil were lower than from the western soil. Replicate leachings of Soils
Three and Four showed lower precision than the leachates from the Superfund
soils.
10.0 REFERENCES
1.Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, "Performance Testing of
Method 1312; QA Support for RCRA Testing: Project Report". EPA/600/4-
89/022. EPA Contract 68-03-3249 to Lockheed Engineering and Sciences
Company, June 1989.
2.Research Triangle Institute, "Interlaboratory Comparison of Methods 1310,
1311, and 1312 for Lead in Soil". U.S. EPA Contract 68-01-7075, November
1988.
CD-ROM 1312 - 22 Revision 0
September 1994
Table 1. Volatile Analytes1

Compound CAS No.

Acetone 67-64-1
Benzene 71-43-2
n-Butyl alcohol 71-36-3
Carbon disulfide 75-15-0
Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5
Chlorobenzene 108-90-7
Chloroform 67-66-3
1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2
1,1-Dichloroethylene 75-35-4
Ethyl acetate 141-78-6
Ethyl benzene 100-41-4
Ethyl ether 60-29-7
Isobutanol 78-83-1
Methanol 67-56-1
Methylene chloride 75-09-2
Methyl ethyl ketone 78-93-3
Methyl isobutyl ketone 108-10-1
Tetrachloroethylene 127-18-4
Toluene 108-88-3
1,1,1,-Trichloroethane 71-55-6
Trichloroethylene 79-01-6
Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 76-13-1
Vinyl chloride 75-01-4
Xylene 1330-20-7

When testing for any or all of these analytes, the zero-headspace extractor1
vessel shall be used instead of the bottle extractor.
CD-ROM 1312 - 23 Revision 0
September 1994
Table 2. Suitable Rotary Agitation Apparatus1

Company Location Model No.

Analytical Testing and Warrington, PA 4-vessel extractor (DC20S);
Consulting Services, [phone] 8-vessel extractor (DC20);
Inc. 12-vessel extractor (DC20B)

Associated Design and Alexandria, VA 2-vessel (3740-2);
Manufacturing Company [phone] 4-vessel (3740-4);
6-vessel (3740-6);
8-vessel (3740-8);
12-vessel (3740-12);
24-vessel (3740-24)
Environmental Machine and Lynchburg, VA 8-vessel (08-00-00)
Design, Inc. [phone] 4-vessel (04-00-00)
IRA Machine Shop and Santurce, PR 8-vessel (011001)
Laboratory [phone]

Lars Lande Manufacturing Whitmore Lake, MI 10-vessel (10VRE)
[phone] 5-vessel (5VRE)
Millipore Corp. Bedford, MA 4-ZHE or
[phone] 4 1-liter
bottle extractor
(YT30ORAHW)

Any device that rotates the extraction vessel in an end-over-end fashion at 301
+2 rpm is acceptable.
CD-ROM 1312 - 24 Revision 0
September 1994
Table 3. Suitable Zero-Headspace Extractor Vessels1

Company Location Model No.

Analytical Testing & Warrington, PA C1O2, Mechanical
Consulting Services, Inc. [phone] Pressure Device
Associated Design and Alexandria, VA 3745-ZHE, Gas
Manufacturing Company [phone] Pressure Device
Lars Lande Manufacturing Whitmore Lake, MI ZHE-11, Gas 2
[phone] Pressure Device

Millipore Corporation Bedford, MA YT30O9OHW, Gas
[phone] Pressure Device
Environmental Machine Lynchburg, VA VOLA-TOX1, Gas
and Design, Inc. [phone] Pressure Device

Any device that meets the specifications listed in Step 4.2.1 of the method is1
suitable.
This device uses a 110 mm filter.2
CD-ROM 1312 - 25 Revision 0
September 1994
Table 4. Suitable Filter Holders1

Model/
Company Location Catalogue # Size

Nucleopore Corporation Pleasanton, CA 425910 142 mm
[phone] 410400 47 mm
Micro Filtration Dublin, CA 302400 142 mm
Systems [phone] 311400 47 mm
[phone]
Millipore Corporation Bedford, MA YT30142HW 142 mm
[phone] XX1004700 47 mm

Any device capable of separating the liquid from the solid phase of the waste1
is suitable, providing that it is chemically compatible with the waste and the
constituents to be analyzed. Plastic devices (not listed above) may be used when
only inorganic analytes are of concern. The 142 mm size filter holder is
recommended.
Table 5. Suitable Filter Media1

Pore
Size
Company Location Model (µm)

Millipore Corporation Bedford, MA AP40 0.7
[phone]
Nucleopore Corporation Pleasanton, CA 211625 0.7
[phone]
Whatman Laboratory Clifton, NJ GFF 0.7
Products, Inc.[phone]
Micro Filtration Dublin, CA GF75 0.7
Systems [phone]
[phone]

Any filter that meets the specifications in Step 4.4 of the Method is suitable.1
CD-ROM 1312 - 26 Revision 0
September 1994
TABLE 6 - METHOD 1312 PRECISION RESULTS FOR SEMI-VOLATILES AND METALS

µµµ
CD-ROM 1312 - 27 Revision 0
September 1994
CD-ROM 1312 - 28 Revision 0
September 1994
Figure 1. Rotary Agitation Apparatus
Figure 2. Zero-Headspace Extractor (ZHE)
CD-ROM 1312 - 29 Revision 0
September 1994
METHOD 1312
SYNTHETIC PRECIPITATION LEACHING PROCEDURE
CD-ROM 1312 - 30 Revision 0
September 1994
METHOD 1312
SYNTHETIC PRECIPITATION LEACHING PROCEDURE (continued)
1320 1
CD-ROM Revision 0
Date September 1986
METHOD 1320
MULTIPLE EXTRACTION PROCEDURE
1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION
The Multiple Extraction Procedure (MEP) described in this method is designed
to simulate the leaching that a waste will undergo from repetitive precipitation
of acid rain on an improperly designed sanitary landfill. The repetitive
extractions reveal the highest concentration of each constituent that is likely
to leach in a natural environment. Method 1320 is applicable to liquid, solid,
and multiphase samples.
2.0 SUMMARY OF METHOD
Waste samples are extracted according to the Extraction Procedure Toxicity
Test (Method 1310, Chapter 8) and analyzed for the constituents of concern listed
in Chapter 7, Table 7-1: Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for Characteristic
of EP Toxicity, using the 7000 and 8000 series methods. Then the solid portions
of the samples that remain after application of Method 1310 are re-extracted nine
times using synthetic acid rain extraction fluid. If the concentration of any
constituent of concern increases from the 7th or 8th extraction to the 9th
extraction, the procedure is repeated until these concentrations decrease.
3.0 INTERFERENCES
Potential interferences that may be encountered during analysis are
discussed in the appropriate analytical methods.
4.0 APPARATUS AND MATERIALS
4.1 Refer to Method 1310.
5.0 REAGENTS
5.1 Refer to Method 1310.
5.2 Sulfuric acid:nitric acid, 60/40 weight percent mixture: Cautiously
mix 60 g of concentrated sulfuric acid with 40 g of concentrated nitric acid.
6.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION, PRESERVATION, AND HANDLING
6.1 Refer to Method 1310.
1320 2
CD-ROM Revision 0
Date September 1986
7.0 PROCEDURE
7.1 Run the Extraction Procedure (EP) test in Method 1310.
7.2 Analyze the extract for the constituents of interest.
7.3 Prepare a synthetic acid rain extraction fluid by adding the 60/40
weight percent sulfuric acid and nitric acid to distilled deionized water until
the pH is 3.0 + 0.2.
7.4 Take the solid phase of the sample remaining after the Separation
Procedure of the Extraction Procedure and weigh it. Measure an aliquot of
synthetic acid rain extraction fluid equal to 20 times the weight of the solid
sample. Do not allow the solid sample to dry before weighing.
7.5 Combine the solid phase sample and acid rain fluid in the same
extractor as used in the EP and begin agitation. Record the pH within 5-10 min
after agitation has been started.
7.6 Agitate the mixture for 24 hr, maintaining the temperature at 20-40EC
(68-104EF). Record the pH at the end of the 24-hr extraction period.
7.7 Repeat the Separation Procedure as described in Method 1310.
7.8 Analyze the extract for the constituents of concern.
7.9 Repeat steps 7.4-7.8 eight additional times.
7.10 If, after completing the ninth synthetic rain extraction, the
concentration of any of the constituents of concern is increasing over that found
in the 7th and 8th extractions, then continue extracting with synthetic acid rain
until the concentration in the extract ceases to increase.
7.11 Report the initial and final pH of each extraction and the
concentration of each listed constituent of concern in each extract.
8.0 QUALITY CONTROL
8.1 All quality control data should be maintained and available for easy
reference or inspection.
8.2 Employ a minimum of one blank per sample batch to determine if
contamination or any memory effects are occurring.
8.3 All quality control measures suggested in the referenced analytical
methods should be followed.
1320 3
CD-ROM Revision 0
Date September 1986
9.0 METHOD PERFORMANCE
9.1 No data provided.
10.0 REFERENCES
10.1 None required.
1320 4
CD-ROM Revision 0
Date September 1986