21048 Wepak Corporation EMP 2018.06.14

Environmental Management Plan
Wepak Corporation Property
314 and 332 West Bland Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 21048-17-060
May 14, 2018
H&H Job No. MGN.002
jk'a
1 hart '1• hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3921 Sunset Ridge Rd, Suite 301
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919.847.4241 main

Completed EMP Template Form
CONTENTS
Tables
Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Data
Table 2 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data
Figures
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Sample Location Map
Figure 3 Soil Contaminant Concentrations Map
Figure 4 Groundwater Contaminant Concentrations Map
Appendices
Appendix A Existing Conditions and Demolition Plan
Appendix B Site Plan
Appendix C Proposed Construction Schedule
Appendix D Grading Plan
Appendix E TCLP Lead Laboratory Report
Appendix F Contingency Plan

NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in the
North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a project manager for the program.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments to their project manager prior to any site earthmoving or other
development related activities. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it must be completed,
reviewed by the program, and signed by all signers at the bottom. Consult your project
manager if you have questions.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Date: 6/11/2018
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Wepak Corporation
Brownfields Project Number: 21048-17-060
Brownfields Property Address: 314 and 332 West Bland Street, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County
Brownfields Property Area (acres): approximately 1.37 acres
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ❑ Yes ❑X No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, enter Permit No.:
COMMUNICATIONS
Prospective Developer (PD): 332 West Bland Street, LLC
Phone Numbers: Office: 646-790-5838 Mobile:
Email: [e-mail]
Primary PD Contact: Ralph McGee
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC (Attn: Ralph McGee)
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-887-4621 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Caroline Goodwin
Office: 919-707-8376
1
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

Email: [e-mail]
Other DENR Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste): t-nuc nere w enter sex,
11 NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
Advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept minimum
notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:
On -site assessment or remedial activities: Within 10 days_®
Construction or grading start: Within 10 days CK
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: Within 48 hours
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood, or soil erosion control
measures in area of contamination, venting of explosive environments):
Within 48 hours
Installation of mitigation systems: Within 10 days ❑
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement
redevelopment activities: (as applicable): Within 30 days
11 REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
❑ Residential ❑ Recreational ❑ Institutional ® Commercial ® Office ®Retail ❑ Industrial
❑ Other specify:
2) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (attach conceptual or detailed plans as available):
a) Do plans include demolition of structures)?: ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
b) Do plans include removal of building foundation slab(s) or pavement:
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
c) Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement and other structures: The Brownfields property will be redeveloped for
commercial and retail (non-residential) uses. Current redevelopment plans include renovations
of the existing structures with minor demolition in the southeast portion of ancillary structures
(i.e. the overhang over the current secured hazardous chemical storage area), replacement or
repairs to portions of the concrete slab and footings in Building B, C, E, and F, installation of
subgrade utilities, and leveling undeveloped portions of the Site for paved parking areas. A copy
of the Existing Conditions and Demolition Plan prepared for proposed of the Brownfields
property is included in Appendix A.
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

3) Which category of risk -based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement?
❑ Residential ® Non-residential or Industrial/Commercial
Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall be cited in the Brownfields
Agreement for comparison purposes.
4) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Phase I start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
5/28/2018
The current redevelopment schedule is as follow:
June through October 2018 — Site work (exterior demolition, grading, utilities, and hardscape);
May through July 2018 — Building A - interior demolition, below grade plumbing connections
renovations;
June through August 2018 — Building B - interior/roof demolition, below grade plumbing connections,
excavate/pour footers, concrete slab replacement, renovations;
June through August 2018 — Building F (i.e., the basement area beneath Building C) - interior demolition,
below grade plumbing connections, excavate/pour footers, concrete slab replacement, renovations;
July through November 2018 — Building C North - interior/roof demolition, renovations;
July through October 2018 — Building C South - interior/roof demolition, concrete slab replacement,
renovations;
August through November 2018 — Building D - interior demolition, renovations; and
August through December 2018 — Building E - interior/roof demolition, concrete slab replacement,
renovations.
A copy of the redevelopment Site Plan and schedule are included in Appendix B and Appendix C,
respectively.
b) If applicable, Phase 2 start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each
phase): Not applicable
c) Additional phases planned? If yes, specify activities if known:
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not in the foreseeable future ❑ Decision pending
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 1/1/2019
11 CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Contaminated Media (attach tabulated data summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with
sample locations):
Part 1. Soil: ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater: ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Suspected
3
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

Part 3. Surface Water:
Part 4. Sediment:
Part 5. Soil Vapor:
Part 6. Sub -Slab Soil Vapor:
Part 7. Indoor Air:
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Suspected
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Suspected
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Suspected
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Suspected
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Suspected
PART 1. SOIL — Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list specific compounds):
Historical use of the Brownfields property included truck and bus repairs (1920s-1950s), electrical
switchboard and switch manufacturing (1920s-mid 1960s), and janitorial chemical manufacturing
uses (mid-1970s to current).
Laboratory analytical results of soil samples collected during March 2018 Brownfields assessment
activities, identified arsenic (up to 17 mg/kg) and lead (up to 9,300 mg/kg) at concentrations
exceeding the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites
Branch (IHSB) Residential and Industrial/Commercial Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs).
Benzo(a)anthracene (up to 1.3 mg/kg), benzo(a)pyrene (up to 1.3 mg/kg), benzo(b)fluoranthene (up
to 1.8 mg/kg), dibenz(a,h)anthracene (up to 0.30 mg/kg), and hexavalent chromium (up to 3.2 mg/kg)
were detected at concentrations exceeding the Residential PSRGs. No other compounds have been
identified at concentrations exceeding Residential or Industrial/Commercial PSRGs in Site soil.
Soil sample laboratory analytical results are summarized in Table 1 and depicted on Figure 4.
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet): Compounds at concentrations above the
Industrial/Commercial PSRGs were identified in shallow soil (0-1 ft bgs) in the sample collected from
soil boring SB-6 advanced in the vicinity of the former electrical switchboard manufacturing area
(currently known as the "light well area"). Additionally, compounds detected at concentrations
exceeding the Residential PSRGs were identified in the SB-8 soil sample at a depth of 4.5 -5.5 ft bgs
collected adjacent to the former above -ground storage tank (AST) secondary containment system.
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
Approximately 12,000 sq ft will be disturbed in portions of the Brownfields property planned for
parking, installation of subgrade utilities, installation of the stormwater conveyance system,
installation/repair footings, and repair of building concrete slab floors. Grading activities will be
limited to leveling for new paved parking areas. Site grading activities will be conducted in
accordance with a grading plan utilizing grading equipment (i.e. backhoes, front end loaders, bull
dozers etc.) and the Site development contractor will implement best management practices (i.e.
implementation of silt fencing, berming, and covering stockpiled soil with plastic) to manage soil
during Site redevelopment activities to prevent redistribution of soils onto adjacent properties. The
proposed Grading Plan is included in Appendix D.
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet): Soil excavation for installation stormwater conveyance
piping, subgrade utilities, and the concrete footings may extend up to approximately 5 ft bgs.
4
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan): Up to
approximately 1,600 cubic yards of soil are planned to be disturbed and re -used on -Site during
grading activities.
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants: Up
to approximately 100 cubic yards of potentially impacted soil may be excavated or disturbed during
redevelopment of the Brownfields property. If soil is disturbed during grading/Site work activities in
the vicinity of soil sample S13-6 (light well area), or if unexpected potentially impacted soil is
encountered during grading activities on the Brownfields property, soil will be segregated and
stockpiled on and covered with a minimum of 10-mil plastic to allow for construction activities to
continue. An environmental professional will collect a composite soil sample from the stockpile for
laboratory analysis (as described in the Managing Onsite Soil section below) to determine the
appropriate final disposition of the potentially impacted material.
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
None anticipated
IMPORTED FILL SOIL
1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑x Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported? Import soil for use as beneficial fill
is not anticipated at this time. Should import soil be needed during redevelopment of the
Brownfields property, the PD will contact DEQ Brownfields and the procedures outlined in item #4
below will be implemented.
3) If yes, what is the depth of fill soil to be used at the property? Not applicable
If a range of depths, please list the range.
4) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENTAT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide plan to analyze fill soil to
demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards and can be considered clean for use at the
Brownfields property (Check all that apply):
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury, lead,
selenium and silver)
❑ Metals —Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
❑ Metals — EPA Priority Pollutant List — 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium (speciated
according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver, thallium, and
zinc)
❑ Other Constituents & Analytical Method: rlirk harp to antpr tax
❑ Known borrow material (DESCRIBE SOURCE AND ATTACH SAMPLING PROFILE):
The PD does not plan to collect samples of landscaping materials obtained from a commercial vendor
prior to placement at the Site. DEQ Brownfields will be notified of the volume of landscaping material
needed and the proposed source of the material prior to placement in proposed landscaping areas.
For import structural fill needed for future redevelopment of the Site, the PD will follow the procedures
outlined below.
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

If the PD plans to import fill material from the Vulcan Materials Company quarry located near Pineville,
NC or from the Martin Marietta quarry located on Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, NC, no samples of
the import material will be collected as adequate analytical data is available in the DEQ Brownfields
database to demonstrate material from these facilities is suitable for use as structural fill at a
Brownfields property.
For import material from unknown borrow sources, prior to bringing fill soil to the Site, historical
information about the fill Site and a proposed sampling design will be provided to DEQ for review and
approval based upon the estimated quantity of import fill to be obtained from the fill site. The soil
sample(s) will be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium. Fill soil will be
considered suitable for use at the Site if it does not contain compound concentrations above NCDEQ
PSRGs for Industrial/Commercial Use or typical metals concentrations which are consistent with
background levels identified at the Site.
Fill soil may also be obtained from another Brownfields property with DEQ Brownfields prior written
approval.
MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
1) If soil in known or suspected areas of contamination is anticipated to be excavated from the
Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields Property, or otherwise disturbed during site
grading or other redevelopment activities, please provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates
areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are acceptable, if only preliminary data
available).
2) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION — Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the
North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes generating the
waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed). Click here to enter text.
If yes, do the soils exceed the "Contained -Out" levels in Attachment 1 of the North Carolina
Contained -In Policy? ❑ Yes ❑ No
NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS THE
CONTAINED -OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA CONTAINED -IN POLICY THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR
HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
3) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION — Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?:
® Yes ❑ No
If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
❑ Ignitability
❑ Corrosivity
❑ Reactivity
❑ Toxicity
® TCLP results — Elevated lead concentrations (up to 9,300 mg/kg) were detected in
soil sample SB-6 and the S13-6 duplicate soil sample DUP-1 collected at a depth of 0-1 ft bgs in the light
6
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

well area. Based on laboratory analytical results of the SB-6 and DUP-1 soil samples, the samples were
submitted for laboratory analysis for lead by Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). TCLP
laboratory analytical results indicate that lead was detected at concentrations (up to 29 mg/L) exceeding
the Regulatory Level for lead of 5 mg/L in the soil samples collected from the light well area. Laboratory
analytical results of the TCLP analysis are included in Appendix E.
❑ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual hazardous
constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory TCLP standard)
If no, explain rationale:
NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE SOIL MAY NOT
BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR HAZARDOUS WASTE
SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
4) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
❑ Preliminary Health -Based Residential SRGs
® Preliminary Health -Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs 2/1/2018
❑ Site -specific risk -based cleanup level, or acceptable concentrations determined via
calculated cumulative risk. Enter details of methods used for determination/explanation:
5) Check the following action(s) to be taken during excavation and management of said soils:
® Manage fugitive dust from site:
® Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale: Limited areas of potentially impacted soil will
be encountered or disturbed during future Site redevelopment activities based upon previous soil
sampling analytical data. The grading contractor will take into account conditions such as wind speed,
wind direction, and moisture content of soil during soil grading and stockpiling activities to minimize
dust generation.
In the event that contaminated soil is encountered during Site redevelopment that requires excavation,
particular attention will be paid by contractors to implement dust control measures as needed based on
Site and atmospheric conditions (i.e. by controlled water application). Impacted soil will be managed as
described below.
® Field Screening:
® Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale: During soil disturbance at the Site, the
workers or contractors will observe soils for evidence of potential significantly impacted soil. Evidence
of potential significant impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or
previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e. chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be
noted during Site work, the contractor will contact the project environmental engineer to observe the
suspect condition. If the project environmental engineer confirms that the material may be impacted,
then the procedures below will be implemented. In addition, the environmental engineer will contact
the DEQ Brownfields project manager within two business days to advise that person of the condition.
7
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

® Soil Sample Collection:
® Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe method (e.g., in -situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.); If no, explain rationale:
If significant soil impact is encountered during grading, installation of concrete footings and slabs,
and/or installation or removal of utilities, excavation will proceed only as far as needed to allow grading
and/or construction to continue and/or only as far as needed to allow alternate corrective measures
described below. Soils disturbed from the immediate vicinity of soil boring SB-6, as well as suspect
significantly impacted soil excavated during redevelopment activities will be stockpiled and covered in a
secure area to allow construction to progress. Suspect impacted soil will be underlain by and covered
with minimum 10-mil plastic sheeting. At least one representative sample of the soil will be collected
for analysis of total VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium. If the results of analysis
of the sample indicate that the soil could potentially exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous waste
criteria, then the soil will also be analyzed by the TCLP for those compounds that could exceed the
toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria. Impacted soil will be handled in the manner described
below based upon the laboratory analyses:
i. If no organic compounds are detected in a sample (other than which are attributable to
sampling or laboratory artifacts) and metals are below the DEQ Residential PSRGs or are consistent with
published and Site -specific background levels, then the soil will be deemed suitable for use as on -Site fill
or as off -Site fill. The proposed location(s) for off -Site placement of soil (other than a permitted facility)
along with the receiving facility's acknowledgement for acceptance of the soil will be provided to DEQ
for approval prior to taking the soil off -Site.
ii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed the DEQ
Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or
which are consistent with Site -specific background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations are
below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil may be used on -Site as fill without restriction.
iii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the DEQ Industrial/Commercial
PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with
background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then the
soil, with DEQ's written approval, may be used on -Site as fill below an impervious surface, or at least 2 ft
of compacted clean soil. If the impacted soil with concentrations above Industrial/Commercial PSRGs is
moved to an on -Site location, its location and depth will be documented, covered with a geotextile
fabric so that its location can be identified if encountered in the future, and its location will be provided
to DEQ in an updated survey plat.
iv. Impacted soil may be transported to a permitted facility such as a landfill provided that the soil
is accepted at the disposal facility. If soil is transported to a permitted facility, the permitted facility's
written approval to dispose of soil from the Site will be included with the final EMP report. In the
unlikely event that the sample data indicates concentrations above TCLP hazardous waste criteria, then
the soil must be transported off -Site to a permitted disposal facility that can accept or treat hazardous
waste.
® Stockpile impacted soil in accordance with NCDENR IHSB protocol in the current version of
the "Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup", and providing erosion control, prohibiting
contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing
contaminated runoff. Explain any variances:
8
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

® Analyze potentially impacted soil for the following chemical analytes:
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury,
lead, selenium and silver)
❑ Metals —Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel,
selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)
❑ Metals — EPA Priority Pollutant List — 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
❑ Other Constituent(s) & Analytical Method(s): If suspected contaminated soil is
identified during Site redevelopment activities, soil will be sampled and analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and
RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium. VOC and SVOC concentrations will be compared to
Industrial/Commercial Use PSRGs. Metal concentrations will be compared to Industrial/Commercial Use
PSRGs, Site -specific background levels.
® Proposed Measures to Obtain Pre -Approval for Reuse of Impacted Soil within the
Brownfields Property Boundary
® Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
® Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on
site map to Brownfields Project Manager once known
® Use geotextile to mark depth of fill material (provide description of material)
® Manage soil under impervious cap ® or clean fill
Describe cap orfill: If contaminated soil is encountered, it will be placed under impervious
materials or at least 2 ft of clean fill. Potential impervious caps include future building foundations
and paved areas. See attached development plan in Appendix B. (provide location diagram)
® Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-
recorded if actions are Post -Recordation).
❑ Other: Note that impacted soil is that exceeds Residential PSRGs
® Final grade sampling of exposed soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or permanent
hardscape): [if not checked provide rationale for not needing]
Provide diagram of soil sampling locations, number of samples, and denote Chemical
Analytical Program with check boxes below (Check all that apply):
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury,
lead, selenium and silver)
❑ Metals —Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel,
selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)
❑ Metals — EPA Priority Pollutant List — 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
❑ Pesticides
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

❑ PCBs
❑ Other Constituents & Analytical Method: Following completion of soil disturbance
for any future Site development (i.e., after grading and utility construction), an environmental
professional will be contracted to assess the Site for areas that are not covered with building foundations,
sidewalks, or asphalt or concrete parking areas and driveways, or other similar impervious areas. Based
on observations made by the environmental professional, a plan will be prepared for final grade sampling
and submitted to DEQ Brownfields for review and approval.
OFFSITE TRANSPORT & DISPOSITION OF EXCAVATED SOIL
NOTE: Unless soil will be transported offsite for disposal in a permitted facility under applicable
regulations, no contaminated or potentially contaminated soil may leave the site without approval
from the brownfields program. Failure to obtain approval may violate a brownfields agreement,
endangering liability protections and making said action subject to enforcement. Justifications
provided below must be approved by the Program in writing prior to completing transport activities.
® Transport and dispose of impacted soil offsite (documentation of final disposition must be sent to
Brownfields Project Manager)
® Landfill - analytical program determined by landfill
® Landfarm or other treatment facility Click here to enter text.
❑ Use as Beneficial Fill Offsite - provide justification: slick hero t- ontor to-
® Use as Beneficial Fill at another Suitable Brownfields Site - (Note: a determination that a
site is a "Suitable Brownfields" site will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same
or similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil as beneficial soil will not
increase the potential for risk to human health and the environment at that site, and that notarized
documentation of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of the receiving site is
provided to Brownfields. Provide justification: As previously mentioned, cut/fill at the site is
expected to balance. However, in the unlikely event that soil needs to be exported off -site, a request
will be submitted to DEQ requesting approval prior to movement of soil off -site, unless the soil is
taken to a permitted facility.
MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
❑ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)
® Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were
removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth from
which it was excavated.
❑ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, and/or
degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants? Result: Yes ❑ No X
If no, include rationale here
If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials
Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
10
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

PART 2. GROUNDWATER — Please fill out the information below and attach figure showing
distribution of groundwater contaminants at site
What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property? During groundwater assessment
activities conducted at the Site in March 2018, the potentiometric groundwater surface was measured
at depths ranging from approximately 13.3 ft bgs (TMW-3) in the northeastern portion of the Site to
approximately 16.5 ft bgs (TMW-1) in the northwestern portion of the Site.
Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ®onsite ® offsite ❑ both ❑ or unknown
sources? Describe source(s): Laboratory analytical results of groundwater samples collected during
March 2018 Brownfields assessment activities identified benzene (up to 7.9 µg/L), naphthalene (up to
6.6 µg/L), carbon tetrachloride (up to 4.8 J µg/L), and 1-methylnaphthalene (up to 2.6 J µg/L) at
concentrations exceeding the DEQ groundwater screening criteria established under 15A NCAC
02L.0202 in upgradient temporary groundwater monitoring wells TMW-4 and/or TMW-5. Carbon
tetrachloride in the TMW-4 groundwater sample also slightly exceeds the DEQ Division of Waste
Management (DWM) February 2018 Residential Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Level (GWSL).
Vinyl chloride (0.85 J µg/L) and trichloroethylene(TCE) (11 µg/L) were detected at concentrations
exceeding the 2L Standards in the TMW-2 groundwater sample collected downgradient of the former
bus repair area and Wepak Corporation operations. The TCE concentration also exceeds the DEQ DWM
Non -Residential GWSL. However, DEQ Risk Calculator (February 2018) results indicate that cumulative
Carcinogenic Risk (2.4 X 10-6) and the cumulative Hazard Index (0.51) for compounds detected in the
TMW-2 groundwater sample are within the acceptable risk range for a Non -Residential use scenario.
What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property? Groundwater beneath the
Site is expected to mimic surface topography and flow approximately from south-southwest toward the
north-northeast.
Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, describe these activities:
It is not anticipated that groundwater will be encountered during construction activities conducted in
the area of planned redevelopment.
Should groundwater reach the surface during redevelopment of the Brownfields property, the PD or the
PD's contractor will contact the project environmental engineer. The environmental engineer will
update the DEQ Brownfields project manager within two business days.
In the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if
no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of
groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary
sewer, or sampling procedures): Although not anticipated at this time, appropriate worker safety
measures will be undertaken if groundwater gathers in an open excavation within an area determined
to be impacted during construction activities. The accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate,
tested and disposed off -site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted
above DEQ surface water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and State regulations for
erosion control and construction stormwater control.
11
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

PART 3. SURFACE WATER — Please fill out the information below.
Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated: ❑ Yes ® No
Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment activities?
❑ Yes ® No
In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities, or
clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of such events (e.g.
flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
If surface water run-off gathers in an open excavation determined during construction to be impacted,
appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken. The accumulated water will be allowed to
evaporate, tested and disposed off -site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not
impacted above DEQ surface water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and State
regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control.
=DIMENT — Please fill out the information below.
Is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ❑ Yes ® No
Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment activities?
❑ Yes ® No
If yes, attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.
In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
11 PART 5. SOIL VAPOR — Please fill out the information below.
Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following
vapor intrusion screening levels in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
Groundwater: ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
Groundwater: ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Attach a map showing the location of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site screening levels.
If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated? Depth to groundwater in
TMW-2 where TCE was detected at concentrations exceeding DEQ DWM Non -Residential GWSLs was
12
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

measured at 13.7 feet bgs. The calculated cumulative risks do not exceed acceptable risk levels for a
non-residential worker exposure scenario.
Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
In the event contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities (trenches,
manways, basements or other subsurface work), list activities for management of such contact:
In the unlikely event potentially impacted soil vapors are encountered during future redevelopment
activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be
performed (ex. worker breathing zone will be monitored using a calibrated photoionization detector)
and the Brownfields project manager will be notified. If results indicate further action is warranted,
appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented. In addition,
the potential need for building vapor mitigation will also be considered at that time.
PART 6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR -please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.
Are sub -slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
If data indicate that sub -slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing
the location of these exceedances.
At what depth(s) is sub -slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ❑ 0-6 inches ® Other, If other
describe: No sub -slab vapor samples have been collected at the Site. Therefore, the potential for
impacts in sub -slab vapor is unknown.
Will workers encounter contaminated sub -slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact: In the unlikely event potentially impacted soil vapors are
encountered during future redevelopment activities, worker breathing zone will be monitored using
a calibrated photoionization detector and the Brownfields project manager will be notified. If results
indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans)
will be implemented. In addition, the potential need for building vapor mitigation will also be
considered at that time.
13
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

PART 7. INDOOR AIR — Please fill out the information below.
Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
If yes, attach a map showing the location where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk -based screening levels will not
be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated indoor air
during planned redevelopment activities?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact: In the unlikely event there is evidence of potential indoor
air issues (i.e. unusual odors) during future redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated and
appropriate safety screening of the indoor air will be performed, and the Brownfields project
manager will be notified. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering
controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented. If warranted, safety screening
procedures will include periodically screening indoor air for volatile organic vapors with a calibrated
photoionization detector when workers present in the Site buildings identify potential indoor air
issues. In addition, the potential need for building vapor mitigation will also be considered at that
time.
11 PART 8 — Vapor Mitigation System — Please fill out the information below.
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system proposed for this Brownfields Property?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
If yes, provide the date the plan was submitted to the Brownfields Program.
Attach the plan.
Has the vapor mitigation plan been approved by the NC Brownfields Program?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Has the vapor mitigation plan been signed and sealed by a North Carolina professional engineer?
❑ Yes ❑ No
What are the components of the vapor intrusion mitigation system?
❑ Sub -slab depressurization system
❑ Sub -membrane depressurization system
❑ Block -wall depressurization system
❑ Drain tile depressurization system
❑ Passive mitigation methods
❑ Vapor barriers
❑ Perforated piping vented to exterior
❑ Other method:
14
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

PART 9. CONTINGENCY FOR ENCOUNTERING UNKNOWN TANKS, DRUMS, OR OTHER WASTE
MATERIALS
Please provide a contingency plan in the event unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other
waste materials are encountered during site activities.
Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth -moving activities at
the site:
® Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
® Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility lines, etc.
® Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
Notification to State Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of contamination are
discovered. See Notification Section on Page 1 for notification requirements.
11 POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
In accordance with the site's Brownfield Agreement, provide a report within the designated schedule
to the State Brownfields Project Manager.
® Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a redevelopment summary report in compliance
with the site's Brownfields Agreement.
15
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014

APPROVAL SIGNATURES
Vishal Arora
Authorized Signatory
332 West Bland Street LLC
Prospective Developer
Printed Name/Title/Company
Consultant
Printed Name/Title/Company
Project
16
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
June 13, 2018
Date
to
,��Iltllm

Table 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Data
Wepak Corporation Property
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. MGN-002
Sample ID
SB-1
SB-2
SB-3
SB-4
SB-6* I DUP-01*
SB-7
SB-8
BKG-1
BKG-2
Residential
Industrial/
Commercial
Site Specific
Background
Regional Background
Metals in Soil
Date
3/7/2018
3/8/2018
3/7/2018
3/7/2018
3/8/2018
3/7/2018
3/8/2018
3/6/2018
3/6/2018
Former Hill
Former bus oil
Silk screen
Bulk material ASTs
Former electrical switchboard
Chemical storage
g
Former AST
Sample Location
cleaning area and
and bulk mixing
secondary
Background
(1)
PSRGs
�3�
Metals in Soil
Trucking UST area
catchment
manufacturing area
room
PSRGs
air compressors
area
containment area
Depth ft b s
7-9
2-3
1-2
9-11
0-1
1-2
4.5-5.5
2.5-3.5 2-3
Range
Range Mean
Units
m /k
VOCs (8260B)
Acetone
<0.028
<0.024
<0.025
<0.034
<0.025
0.033 J, R-05
<0.025
<0.032
12,000
140,000
n-Butylbenzene
0.0061
0.012
<0.00073
<0.0010
<0.00076
<0.00079
<0.00073
<0.00095
780
12,000
sec-Butylbenzene
0.0057
0.0063
<0.0010
<0.0015
<0.0011
<0.0011
<0.0010
<0.0014
1,600
23,000
tert-Butyl benzene
<0.0011
0.0021
<0.00094
<0.0013
<0.00097
<0.0010
<0.00094
<0.0012
1,600
23,000
Ethylbenzene
0.0095
<0.00083
<0.00084
<0.0012
<0.00086
<0.00091
<0.00084
<0.0011
6.1
27
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
0.0052
0.0068
<0.00073
<0.0010
<0.00076
<0.00079
<0.00073
<0.00095
410
2,100
p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
<0.00095
0.0014 J
<0.00084
<0.0012
<0.00086
<0.00091
<0.00084
<0.0011
NS
NS
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
0.0011 J
<0.00093
<0.00094
<0.0013
<0.00097
<0.0010
<0.00094
<0.0012
49
220
Naphthalene
0.057
0.062
<0.00073
<0.0010
<0.00076
<0.00079
<0.00073
<0.00095
4.1
18
n-Propylbenzene
0.010
0.010
<0.00073
<0.0010
<0.00076
<0.00079
<0.00073
<0.00095
780
5,100
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
0.0045
<0.00083
<0.00084
<0.0012
<0.00086
<0.00091
<0.00084
<0.0011
63
370
1,3,5-Trimeth (benzene
0.0013 J
<0.00062
<0.00063
<0.00088
<0.00065
<0.00068
<0.00063
<0.00081
56
320
SVOCs (8270D)
Acenaphthene
0.48
<0.068
<0.068
<0.064
<0.070
0.35
<0.061
<0.074
720
9,000
Anthracene
0.12 J
<0.065
<0.065
<0.062
<0.067
0.51
<0.059
<0.071
3,600
45,000
Benzo(a)anthracene
<0.058
<0.060
<0.060
<0.057
<0.062
1.3
<0.054
0.17 J
1.1
21
Benzo(a)pyrene
<0.068
<0.070
<0.071
<0.067
<0.073
1.3
<0.064
0.15 J
0.11
2.1
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
<0.062
<0.064
<0.064
<0.060
0.074 J
1.8
<0.058
0.24 J
1.1
21
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
<0.096
<0.10
<0.10
<0.094
<0.10
1.2
<0.090
0.15 J
NS
NS
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
<0.068
<0.070
<0.071
<0.067
<0.073
0.62
<0.064
0.088 J
11
210
Carbazole
<0.057
<0.058
<0.059
<0.055
<0.060
0.49
<0.053
<0.064
NS
NS
Chrysene
<0.068
<0.070
<0.071
<0.067
<0.073
1.6
<0.064
0.21 J
110
2,100
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
<0.13
<0.14
<0.14
<0.13
<0.14
0.30
<0.12
<0.15
0.11
2.1
Dibenzofuran
0.33 J
<0.078
<0.079
<0.074
<0.081
0.40 J
<0.071
<0.086
15
210
Fluoranthene
0.13 J
<0.074
<0.075
<0.070
0.10 J
3.2
<0.067
0.17 J
480
6,000
Fluorene
0.96
0.24
<0.073
<0.069
<0.076
0.36
<0.066
<0.080
480
6,000
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
<0.16
<0.16
<0.16
<0.15
<0.17
1.1
<0.15
<0.18
1.1
21
1-Methyl naphthalene
5.1
1.4
<0.087
0.11 J
<0.089
0.29
<0.078
<0.094
18
73
2-Methyl naphthalene
7.6
1.7
<0.079
0.12 J
<0.081
0.49
<0.071
<0.086
48
600
Naphthalene
1.8
0.25
<0.12
<0.11
<0.12
2.3
<0.10
<0.13
4.1
18
Phenanthrene
2.0
0.34
<0.12
<0.11
<0.12
3.1
<0.11
<0.13
NS
NS
Pyrene
0.35
<0.074
<0.075
<0.070
0.095 J
3.0
<0.067
0.25
360
4,500
PCBs (8082A)
ALL BRL
NA
NA
NA
ALL BRL
ALL BRL
NA
NA
Metals (6020A-B/7471 B/7196A)
Arsenic
2.9
0.24 B
1.9
0.69
13
17
1.7
5.2
1.2
1.4
0.68
3.0
1.2 - 1.4
1.0 - 18
4.8
Barium
140
160
17
72
300
260 MS-1 1, R-02
36
240
26
34
3,100
47,000
26-34
50 - 1,000
356
Cadmium
0.19 J
<0.014
<0.014
<0.013
5.0
6.6
<0.012
1.6
<0.014
0.054 J
14
200
<0.014 - 0.054
1.0 - 10*
4.3
Chromium (total)
34
32
60
24
53
46 MS-11
23
56
12
14
12 - 14
7.0 - 300
65
Hexavalent Chromium
<0.099
<0.10
<0.11
<0.098
<0.27
3.2
<0.094
<0.28
NA
NA
0.31
6.5
NA
NS
NS
Trivalent Chromium
34
32
60
24
53
42.8
23
56
23,000
350,000
NS
NS
Lead
42
2.5
20
8.0
22,900
99.300 MS-19, R-02
8.1
570
4.2
26
400
800
4.2 - 26
ND - 50
16
Mercury
0.023 J
0.0079 J
0.082
0.0066 J
0.18
0.097
0.015 J
0.79
0.054
0.11
2.3
9.7
0.054-0.11
0.03 - 0.52
0.121
Selenium
<0.061
<0.061
<0.061
<0.059
0.75 J
0.96
<0.055
<0.066
0.47 J
<0.060
78
1,200
<0.060 - 0.47
<0.1 - 0.8
0.42
Silver
0.070 J
1 0.076 J
1 0.069 J
1 0.037 J
1 13
1 18 R-02
1 0.058 J
1 1.1
1 0.035 J
1 0.040 J
1 78
1 1,200
1 0.035 - 0.040
ND - 5.0
NS
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) (February 2018).
2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005. Background Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous US soils.
Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.
Bold values exceed Residential Health -based PSRGs and for metals exceed Site -specific ranges of concentration and mean regional background concentrations
Underlined values exceed Industrial/Commercial PSRG
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi -volatile organic compounds; PCBs = polychlorinated biphenyls; UST = underground storage tank; AST = aboveground storage tank; ft bgs= feet below ground surface
NA = Not Analyzed; NS = Not Specified; -- = Not Applicable; BRL = below laboratory reporting limits
J = compound was detected above the laboratory method detection limit but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in an estimated concentration.
B = Analyte is found in the associated blank as well as in the sample.
R-05=Laboratory fortified blank duplicate RPD is outside of control limits. Reduced precision is anticipated for any reported value for this compound.
MS-11 = Matrix spike recovery outside of control limits. Possibility of sample matrix effects that lead to a high bias for reported result or non -homogeneous sample aliquots cannot be eliminated.
MS-19 = Sample to spike ratio is greater than or equal to 4:1. Spiked amount is not representative of the native amount in the sample. Appropriate or meaningful recoveries cannot be calculated.
R-02 = Duplicate relative percent difference (RPD) is outside of control limits. Outlier can be attributed to sample non -homogeneity encountered during sample prep.
* Heterogeneous lithology in SB-6 (0-1) likely caused differences in concentrations of SVOCs, hexavalent chromium, and mercury in duplicate sample DUP-01 when compared to the SB-6 parent sample. SB-6 and DUP-1 soil samples were homogenized by the laboratory and re -analyzed for RCRA metals by EPA method 6020 A-B.
Soil samples from SB-6 and DUP-1 were outside of the hold times for re -analysis of SVOCs and hexavalent chromium and were therefore not re -submitted.
Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)
5:%A -Master Projects\Magnus Capital PartnersjMGN\314 W. Bland Street\Brownfields Assessment Report\Tables\Final tables\BF Assessment Tables Final
5/11/2018 - Hart & Hickman, PC

Table 2
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data
Wepak Corporation Property
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. MGN-002
Sample ID
TMW-1
DUP-01
TMW-2
TMW-3
TMW-4
TMW-5
NC 2L
Groundwater
Residential
(2)
Non -Residential
(2)
Date
3/9/2018
3/9/2018
3/9/2018
3/9/2018
3/9/2018
Downgradient of
Downgradient of
Downgradient in north -northwestern
g
former bus repair
p
former electrical
Upgradient r
Upgradient of south-
1)
Standards
GWSL
GWSL
Sample Location
corner of site
and Wepak
switchboard
southeastern corner
central portion of
of Site
Site
production areas
manufacturing area
Units
/L
VOCs (8260B)
Acetone
<9.7
<9.7
15 J
<9.7
17 J
12 J
6,000
4,500,000
19,000,000
Benzene
<0.12
<0.12
0.12 J
<0.12
<0.12
7.9
1.0
16
69
tert-Butyl Alcohol (TBA)
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
3.9 J
10
NS
NS
n-Butylbenzene
<0.15
<0.15
<0.15
<0.15
<0.15
2.1
70
NS
NS
sec-Butylbenzene
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
0.91 J
70
NS
NS
tert-Butyl benzene
<0.12
<0.12
<0.12
<0.12
<0.12
0.18 J
70
NS
NS
Carbon Tetrachloride
<0.25
<0.25
<0.25
<0.25
4.8 J
<0.25
0.3
4.1
18
Chloroform
<0.22
<0.22
1.9 J
<0.22
3.6
<0.22
70
8.1
36
1,1-Dichloroethylene
<0.21
<0.21
0.27 J
<0.21
<0.21
<0.21
350
39
160
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
<0.15
<0.15
26
<0.15
<0.15
<0.15
70
NS
NS
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
<0.15
<0.15
0.79 J
<0.15
<0.15
<0.15
100
NS
NS
Diethyl Ether
<0.22
<0.22
<0.22
<0.22
0.40 J
<0.22
NS
100
NS
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
6.9
6.9
<0.18
<0.18
<0.18
6.2
NS
1,400
5,900
Ethylbenzene
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
7.8
600
35
150
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)
<0.12
<0.12
<0.12
<0.12
<0.12
2.7
70
180
750
p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)
<0.15
<0.15
<0.15
<0.15
<0.15
0.96 J
25
NS
NS
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether
18
19
<0.090
<0.090
<0.090
<0.090
20
4,500
20,000
Naphthalene
<0.12
<0.12
<0.12
<0.12
<0.12
6.6
6.0
35
150
n-Propylbenzene
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
3.2
70
490
2,000
Toluene
<0.17
<0.17
0.29 J
<0.17
<0.17
0.79 J
600
3,800
16,000
Trichloroethylene
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
<0.20
3.0
1.0
4.4
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
<0.15
<0.15
<0.15
<0.15
0.50 J
<0.15
2,000
NS
NS
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
<0.18
<0.18
<0.18
<0.18
<0.18
0.73 J
400
50
210
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
0.32 J
400
35
150
Vinyl Chloride
<0.13
<0.13
0.85 J
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
0.03
1.5
25
m+p Xylene
<0.26
<0.26
<0.26
<0.26
<0.26
0.94 J
500
71
300
o-Xylene
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
<0.13
0.82 J
500
98
410
SVOCs (8270D)
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (as Azobenzene)
<2.4
<2.7
3.8 J
2.9 J
<2.7
<2.7
NS
1,600
7,200
Isophorone
<1.8
2.2 J
<2.1
<2.1
<2.1
<2.1
40
1-Methylnaphthalene
<1.4
<1.6
<1.6
<1.6
<1.6
2.6 J
1.0
NS
NS
2-Methylnaphthalene
<1.4
<1.5
<1.5
<1.5
<1.5
3.1 J
30
NS
NS
Naphthalene
<1.4
<1.6
<1.6
<1.6
<1.6
2.9 J
6.0
35
150
RCRA Metals (6020A-B, 7470A)
Arsenic
<0.72
<0.72
<0.72
<0.72
<0.72
<0.72
10
Barium
71
69
87
91
180
120
700
Cadmium
<0.19
<0.19
<0.19
0.79 J
<0.19
<0.19
2.0
Chromium (total)
1.0 J
1.1 J
1.6 J
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
10
Lead
<0.28
<0.28
<0.28
<0.28
<0.28
0.94 J
15
Mercury
<0.034
<0.034
<0.034
<0.034
<0.034
<0.034
1.0
0.18
0.75
Selenium
<4.2
<4.2
<4.2
<4.2
<4.2
<4.2
20
Silver
I <0.15
1 <0.15
1 <0.15
1 <0.15
1 <0.15
1 <0.15
1 20
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) 15A NCAC 02L.0202 Groundwater Standards (NC 2L Standards) (April 2013).
2) NC DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Level (GWSLs) (February 2018)
With the exception of metals, only constituents detected in at least one sample are shown.
Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (Ng/L).
Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
Bold values exceed NC 2L Standard (April 2013).
Underlined values exceed the DWM Residential GWSL (February 2018).
Gray shaded values exceed Non -Residential GWSL (February 2018).
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi -volatile organic compounds, RCRA = resource conservation and recovery act
NA = not analyzed; NS = not specified; -- = not applicable
J = compound was detected at concentration greater than the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in an estimated concentration.
Table 2 (Page 1 of 1)
S: /AA M,,t,r Project,\Magnus Capital Put-rs(MGN)\314 W. Bland Street\Br.w fid&AssessmentReport\Tables\Final tables\BF Assessment T,bi,s_F,,,l Hart &Hickman, Pl./

■ � W o ,t �: � 149
•TY-; LR SITE
L ' 4 Ip' �h r :•�..,
s> ne
77
¢4 � •y �� '.'' � ii' ��'" u
�• .... � � `� ITT !r"�_�^ .. �.. .�� 1%.
V
1 1 t3 5 i 1. a prp gna t'
qb
45�—� _-f• J /r L� ,fee � [� . � ,:V, �
f thleh
■ + -t Par pVE 4 �4
l i •,
APPROXIMATE
N 0 2000 4000
SCALE IN FEET
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
CHARLOTTE EAST, NORTH CAROLINA, 1991
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)

« cjib
41
Co.���'
THE U •WN BREWING *0.
~ S' (1327 S. STREET)
LITTLE H DWAREs
P KING
WALKE GER
f (1331 S. MIN TREET)
HILL TRUCKING Jf
FORMER UST AREA
UNOCCUPIED�� /
,(F MER HILL TRUCKING) t
SHIPPING & RECEIVING 0 ,
LOADING DOCK
FORMER BUS OIL CA HMENT `
(BAS ENT) Oy
•. AFT GROWLER
SILK SCREEN CLEANING AREA ROOM
,- �� ( S. ROOMCHUIkH ST
/'� 'PRODUCTION ,� SILK SCREEN STORAGE
& AIR COMPRESSORS �^ RINSE WATER DISCHARGE
RAIN (BASEMENT)
HYDR LIC SCISSOR LIFT
f OUT OF USE BOILER
(BASEMENT)
FORMER LECT CAL SWITCHBOA
p f y MANUF CTURING EA r
SHIPP G &
RE WING
BULK MATERIAL ASTs &
BULK MIXING AREA CHEMICAL '
STORAGE FORM ST AREA
. MICAL STORAGE ROOM) '-=~ ' AREA BATCH IXINGG'OOM
� 0
GRANGER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY ` ��•�1�.
14 1 S. MINT STREET)
— CANOP
( 0 S S )
` SECURED HA JRDOUS CHEMICAL STORAGE �
� y
�• �� �RESIDENTIAL�
>' SEOUL FOOD MEAT CO. r
(1400 S. CHURCH STREET)fs' \

e
jib
Co
ML THE U WN BREWING-4 .
y S' - (1327 S. STREET) #,
LITTLE H DWAREs
P KING ®•
WALKE GER
f (1331 S. MIN TREET)
HILL TRUCKINGldmLJf
p;i' '�;• FORMER UST AREA
KUL
/ UNOCCUPIED��
,(F MER HILL TRUCKING) t
SHIPPING & RECEIVING 0
LOADING DOCK
' FORMER BUS OIL CA H.MENT `
/ - (BAS ENT)
® � �•., I , AFT GROWLER
( S. CHUIktH ST
SILK SCREEN CLEANING AREA /`� �?RODUCTION SILK SCREEN STORAGE ROOM
& AIR COMPRESSORS _. RINSE WATER DISCHARGE
RAIN (BASEMENT)
HYDR LIC SCISSOR LIFT
f OUT OF USE BOILER ix .
/ (BASEMENT)
f� FORMER LECT CALSWITCHBOA
iv
4�- f MANUF CTURING EA
SHIPP G &
1 RE WING
BULK MATERIAL ASTs & � y � HEMICAL
BULK MIXING AREA STORAGE FORM -- ST SECONDARY _
J AREA CO AINMNT AREA
CHEMICAL STORAGE ROOM BAT MIXING ROOM
�a11i
GRANGER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1���• CANOP
(1401 S. MINT STREET)
2,
`�fr
SECURED HA RDOUS CHEMICAL STORAGE
� y
� �• ��i
SEOUL FOOD MEAT CO. ,; ^� � RESIDENTIALr
(1400 S. CHURCH STREET)

Appendix A
Existing Conditions and Demolition Plan
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLURONS

CONCRETE
20 SPACES
728_2 _- -
_ 729 728.3 w
7z� i
72s.o-Z2s1/2"NI 7zs.7 �7310
731.59
r'y 729.s
�730.45
I N
\ M
EO 7G� 9 72s. Q �F731.ts �.
74
x
o I
CONCRETE Ln
GRAVEL I I I II / r7
729.2 _
x N 7 I
N
O
k °J
GM 0.7llIl M
129 19+ 3.9 7-2-9.9 +730.13 x2Y * 731.05 731.69 x
I 731.74
729.4 ............................
x /O
0
7
O
�M w
a
M �I x
/ Of
M FFE= FFE=
Z07
LO DING DOCK 731.9
729.6
-REMOVE
EXISTING
CONCRETE
APRON
x x
/ 731.874
\
730.55
\\ Y
M J
730.1 ^ FE= \ �
zJ \
x x � , a z' w
730.4
GRAVEL
13 26 \)30 � 30 39+
/NN
CONCRETE /
/ , G SSG
AN
i
J
W
5E
SIDEWALK
WEI
R 6"CURB
0
\ FFE
731-8� PM
OFF
0 I\
SSGi-
/w
W �-
`EXISTING UTILITIES
TO BE ABANDON
PP
731.7
x
GRAVEL
-51-­-
SG 8"SzTR.
W
LLJ
~w
U � �
PP
Cn LLLJ
LU
-- / all
U)
� I GEm
CONCRETE
`W
\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\ ONCRETE ORNEWA / = J
EUP 1 a U \\\ C CID
EN
M WV
RIM-726.07 iB GR:725.06 J 00
�p�PE OUT?7216Q
16 �f l l l i
IN A :720.32 S
S48°22'04"E 400.00'(T) IN B : 720.62 _ ` �� �_ _ „a o 1J IR
J :719.77 3.9' DI �5� 1/2"NIR �9 90'- T�
7721=.3 � 728.9 x 728 6 _ � 730.4 5.0' 0 3
204.7 `` ^)
3.5 � � v J
725.28
J U N
RIM: 730.87
IN(A):725.27
z IN B :725.37
04 OUT- 0 SSMH 25.17
, ) 3: i (� ,
o (A)332
SS
1 TORY#BRICK/BLOCK FF4.� 734.48 734. 734.4 FFE= 7 2 0 � \ \C
W` REHOUSE BUILDING \ z I LOADING DOCK 7\4s 3.4 �� I/' �32�
FOOT IN T = 35 104 SQ FT BUILDI c OVERHANG 73
730.E
0 R I - I730.8 v �731.2 731.36 x-
Ll E CONCRETE ® &R:730.86 I ^ I 4732.68 II
\(729.01 x5 1
INV. TO 4' D IN) GRAVEL
7 .410"GONG: � WALL 731 A � I
73�.aes N
7,31.00
730.9
LO x\ I*1 j jx I F!
x731.6 31.16
x733.3 733.5 � � I �
i� x 1.scoN� 731.3x EXISTING I I N
733.6�yAL �J3.8 L STRUCTURES TO I
M M BE REMOVED o
_
123.6' FFE= Z _ - - z I Z COx 733.6 733.8 I
732.7
IL AIDING, ,Q, \ 732. zI I ?��� w U)
OCKFFE UTILIT \734,15 CONCRETE
\ P T
1732.8
x
GRAVEL \ \1UZR91N' - - - I 32. i 73X.2 I x
a a I EXISTING
734 / STRUCTURES TO
REMOVE EXISTING \ o J -733 BE REMOVED
STREET TREE WITH 0° 00 \ J T REMOVE I
PERMISSION - EXISTING
GRAVEL I GRAVEL CONCRETE
733. 733.5 n 733. _ 734 APRON I /
REMOVE 733.31 ^ 734.06
EXISTING GRAVEL �\ \ POIN OF B�6INNING J
CONCRETE \ BUILDING OVER 34 / NC GRID 974.43' /
APRON LINE 1.4' G - �35- \ E:1,445,306.00' /
1.0' OF R/ \ T / �` 1/2"
\ FFE= FFE= E_ \ H � / NIR
300.00'
SIDE LK 4 °22' 4"W 385.56'(T) SIDEWALK
o � o
SS SS,� / S SSMH SS SS
G M:
/ V VJ G RI732.78/G G
L,J IN:725.38 EMOVE
/ EXISTING
( <v l CONCRETE
\ \ APRON 51i /
W W W
/
PP / PP
/
3/4"EI
- - - - 0.9 OFF /W 500, _
/ EWALK
OC/o /
�6U R
S GSTERR. SS SS G
WEST BLAND/,STREET
(60' PUBLICS/W)
- W W W
EXISTING UTILITIES
TO BE ABANDON
G . S S
W �W
P
I
ca
0
M
I RIM:
732.0
SDMH
O
REMOVE EXISTING
STREET TREE WITH
/ PERMISSION
U / 1
a / 1
00 /
/
I
SPEED HUMP
CONCRETE
� U
736
/ SSMH
RIM: 736.08
IN: 731.28
OUT: 71.18
WV
G
(J) /
8" ERT R.
SS SS SS G
�G G -
REMOVE
EXISTING A�
CONCRETE )
_ W APRON W
wv \
CONCRETE
- G
6"CURB E E -
PP CONCRETE30"C&
G FO
FH FO -
146.3' +/-
(MH TO MH)
iBM- a87 �
CW OF WDR" \ CONCRET
This Plan Is A
Preliminary Design.
NOT Released For
Construction.
0 20' 40' 80'
SCALE: 1 "=20'
REVISIONS:
W
r�
C/ /
Lo
W
W
�
o
N
Z
Z
Cf)
LL
O
Q
Z
O
V
Z
U
Z
(J)
p
W
ICI
LU
MN
CY)
EX.
CONDITIONS
& DEMO
M-D-Yy
CORPORATE CERTIFICATIONS
INC PE: C-2930 INC LA: C-253
SC ENG : NO. 3599 SC LA: NO. 211
Project Manager: MDL
Drawn By: MDL
Checked By: MDL
Date: 3/16/18
Project Number: 17049
Sheet Number:
L-100.1
a l I I SHEET # 2 OF 9

Appendix B
Site Plan
hart � hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

TRANSFORMER-
ENCLOSURE -
(SEE ARCHITECT PLAN)
SITE NOTES:
1. BOUNDARY, EXISTING UTILITIES, AND OTHER EXISTING FEATURES
TAKEN FROM BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY: RB PHARR
& ASSOCIATES, PA 1420 HAWTHORNE LANE CHARLOTTE NC 28204
2. COORDINATE ALL CURB AND STREET GRADES IN INTERSECTION WITH
INSPECTOR.
3. SIGHT TRIANGLES SHOWN ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED.
4. IN ROLLING AND HILLY TERRAINS, SWEEPING OF THE STONE BASE
AND/OR APPLICATION OF A TACK COAT MAY BE REQUIRED NEAR
INTERSECTIONS. THESE REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ESTABLISHED BY
THE INSPECTOR AND BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS.
5. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN IS NOT AN AUTHORIZATION TO GRADE
ADJACENT PROPERTIES. WHEN FIELD CONDITIONS WARRANT
OFF -SITE GRADING, PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE
AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS.
6. IN ORDER TO ENSURE PROPER DRAINAGE, KEEP A MINIMUM OF 0.5%
SLOPE ON THE CURB.
7. SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE
STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY IF DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE INSPECTOR.
8. THE PURPOSE OF THE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT (SDE) IS TO
PROVIDE STORM WATER CONVEYANCE AND ANY STRUCTURES
AND/OR OBSTRUCTION TO STORM WATER FLOW IS PROHIBITED.
9. HIGH -DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) STORM DRAINAGE PIPE
INSTALLED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED PUBLIC STREET
RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY'S INSPECTOR PRIOR
TO ANY BACKFILL BEING PLACED. BACKFILL MATERIAL MUST BE
APPROVED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE
MATERIAL WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.
10. BACKFILL MATERIAL MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR
PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE MATERIAL WITHIN THE PUBLIC STREET
RIGHT-OF-WAY.
11. NON-STANDARD ITEMS (IE: PAVERS, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, ETC.) IN
THE RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRE A RIGHT-OF-WAY ENCROACHMENT
AGREEMENT WITH THE (CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION/NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION) BEFORE INSTALLATION. FOR CITY OF CHARLOTTE
MAINTAINED STREETS, CONTACT CDOT AT [phone].
12. LOT DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. REFERENCE RECORD PLAT FOR
EXACT DIMENSIONS.
13. ON -SITE BURIAL PITS REQUIRE AN ON -SITE DEMOLITION LANDFILL
PERMIT FROM THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
14. APPROXIMATE TIME OF ESTIMATED COMPLETION OF
INFRASTRUCTURE: 6 MONTHS
15. TRASH WILL BE HANDLED BY PRIVATE WASTE DUMPSTER PICK-UP.
16. ALL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ALONG EAST MOREHEAD ARE TO BE
COORDINATED WITH THE NCDOT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PRIOR
TO CONSTRUCTION.
17. CURB AND GUTTER SHOWN ON PLANS MAY BE ADJUSTED BASED
UPON FIELD CONDITIONS.
18. CERTIFICATION AND STREET CUT PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR
UTILITY CUTS ON CITY STREETS. ALLOW 7 DAYS PROCESSING FOR
PERMIT. FOR INFORMATION CONTACT CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (704-336-4025) OR VISIT
HTTP://WWW.CHARM ECK.0RG/DEPARTMENTS/TRANSPORTATION/
STREET+MAINTENANCE/HOME.HTM
19. PER SECTION 18-175(E) OF CITY CODE AND SECTION 10.0 OF THE
CITY'S POST CONSTRUCTION CONTROLS ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL,
ALL REQUIRED NATURAL AREAS AND/OR POST CONSTRUCTION
CONTROLS EASEMENTS (PCCES) MUST BE RECORDED PRIOR TO THE
ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
20. SITE LIGHTING MUST BE A MINIMUM THIRTY (30) FEET AWAY FROM A
TREE. IF PEDESTRIAN SCALE LIGHTING IS BEING USED, THEN LIGHTING
MUST BE A MINIMUM OF FIFTEEN (15) FEET AWAY FROM A TREE,
UNLESS APPROVED OTHERWISE BY THE CITY.
21. THE DEVELOPER SHALL CONTACT THE CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION (GUS JORDI, 704-336-7086) TO IDENTIFY ANY
CONFLICTS WITH TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION EQUIPMENT. 60 - 90 DAYS
WILL BE REQUIRED TO COORDINATE RELOCATION. DEVELOPER SHALL
BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELATED RELOCATION COST AND / OR ANY
REPAIR COST CAUSED BY THE CONTRACTOR / DEVELOPER.
22. ANY WORK WITHIN THE CITY'S R/W THAT REQUIRES CLOSURE OF THE
SIDEWALK OR TRAVEL LANE FOR LESS THAN 30 DAYS REQUIRES A
R/W USE PERMIT. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS FOR ANY SIDEWALK OR
TRAVEL LANE CLOSURES MUST BE SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE R/W
USE PERMIT REQUEST. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS MUST BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CDOT'S WORK AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL
HANDBOOK (WATCH) AND MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED.
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT CDOT AT LEAST 5 BUSINESS DAYS IN
ADVANCE OF BEGINNING OF WORK AT [phone].
23. CONSTRUCTION STAGING WITHIN CITY R/W LASTING MORE THAN 30
DAYS REQUIRE A R/W LEASE AGREEMENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL
CONTACT CDOT AT [phone].
24. RIGHT-OF-WAY CLOSURES LONGER THAN 30 DAYS REQUIRE A R/W
LEASE AGREEMENT WHICH WILL INCLUDE THE SUBMITTAL OF A
TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS REQUIRED
THROUGH A LEASE AGREEMENT MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE
REQUIRED DURING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW AND ARE
SUBJECT TO REVISIONS. THE REVISED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS
MUST BE SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT PROCESS
FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO START OF R/W CLOSURES. CONTRACTOR
SHALL CONTACT CDOT AT [phone].
25. DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB AND RADII ANNOTATIONS ARE TO
BACK OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
ENTRANCE
(TYP.)
WEST BLAND STREET
(60' PUBLIC R/W)
MOD TYPE II
DRIVEWAY
ENTRANCE
(TYP.)
,W.7W.,
aWOF
VAN
ACCESSIBLE
SPACE WITH
SIGNAGE
CONCRETE
SIDEWALK
1 MOD TYPE II
DRIVEWAY
ENTRANCE
.(TYP.)
SPEEG HUMi'
INE (TYP.)
URBAN OPEN SPA
300 SF
SITE DATA:
TAX PARCEL ID:
07308305
07308303
07308314
EXISTING ZONING:
1-2
PROPOSED REZONING:
TOD-M
SITE AREA:
±1.33 AC
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
29,515 SF BUILDING
PARKING SPACE REQUIRED: N/A
PARKING SPACE PROVIDED: 25
BICYCLE PARKING:
LONG TERM = 2 OR 1 / 10,000 SF BLDG = 3
SHORT TERM = 5% OF PARKING = 1.25 OR 2
COVERED PARKING WILL BE PROVIDED IN LOWER
LEVEL OF BUILDING C
I
URBAN OPEN SPACE
1 SF / 200 SF OF LOT AREA
57,972 SF 200 = 290 SF
This Plan Is A
Preliminary Design.
NOT Released For
Construction.
0 20' 40' 80'
SCALE: 1 "=20'
REVISIONS:
W
V
W
W
W
N
C')
C')
LO
L
r
1
U O
Z N
- Z
W O
O�
J W
a CD
= Z
U z
O
N
W
ry
It It
00
0000
00
N
0000
C cV
QZ
J
L
n V
N)
L.L
W
z
Q
J
a
I-
I..1�
U
W
D
z
z
Ca
G
SITE PLAN
100% DID
M-D-yy
CORPORATE CERTIFICATIONS
NC PE: C-2930 NC LA: C-253
SC ENG : NO. 3599 SC LA: NO. 211
Project Manager: MDL
Drawn By: M D L
Checked By: MDL
Date: 3/16/18
Project Number: 17049
Sheet Number:
L-1 01

Appendix C
Proposed Construction Schedule
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLURONS

d �
�'> W W W WI W �� W W W' W WNNN N N N Ni N N N '1-� I--•'. 1� N Wro� V Old w A W N
i, I+
. _ __ _.
�
n r=a jai: �o
■ ■
N
m a x v w v �, 'T v n m w In z_Z
°' �^,
m y �• m n n ?+ c x z O 0 x O v �^ D m $, 3 n x v O �^ D z 3 v^
0 3 3 q c o �° w 3 o D m N 3° o D o m 3 a o� c 3 3. ��O�
z
ate. d o. m a °° m m = m a a om S c °° z m c N Ip p m $_3, aI o
m
o
a1°i Sn
m a
a• m j 7 c a d 3 o. w d 7 d D_ an 3 p, y = G. 00 .Q �• v O 'O
s
\� _c•
rno D c a=a m n; m '0 .w+ 2 v Ra o .in. < aD. _ F v< n
m x °° d N 3 d °o
v V v°a n: Gl m m c'
v m °
c M.'" F of w— F •' N w— m w E w a
C 3 V
d
.', N N
3 R N m N °' '" 3 °- :°
V
.°�• RO ID w w j w O
an
0
m it w w n .^. '° \
m o. 0 v
3 �
_
3
m
r N w W A N N- N A W F+ A m--- A- A m w W W W A A W W w w N- r N A r r N r r
E£ °D F E E££ F F E tto F£ F E F
o.
O
=
N F' N N� N N N H vsi N�� N 'r a N H N� U N N x N
N an � N � an � •e
N
%
T
3 3 3 a 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
d
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -' 0 0 0 o m m o CI
w w r r � m m m m m °� m M m °I m m .I v m w w w w w w w w w w N w w w w�� A A
3
3
\ \ \ r o \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ m N \ \
N V\\ r A N r A p 1+ 1+ r N N V r N N y N N N N N N N N N N f+ N
\\
\ m m\ r N m\ w r m m m w w m m\\ m m m m m m m m m m m m\\ \ r\ w m
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ i-� 1+ N m r \ \
'�
r`nro.r..m�Nmmm mmmmmmmmmmmm.~.mmmmmmmmm� mOO pp co M
i 1 -Ti 1 1I T+ i i i T 1Ti i 'Ti mTi Tm 1 1 1
`f
M Cn mp• Ln F+ r V V V V CAfA V ou V oo CO V IJ com cn Cl G1 01 > 0 0 0 mp•
`
\ \ N r \ \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
N N N N r r r N N r r N N N 1+ N w w w A A
m w r r r r W m �.. r I+ r m m r r r r F+ Co r r r r m r h+ pp \ A\ W m
w 0. w 00 w w w
m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Co m m m m m m pp m mco co
n4.3
il14
V
yw,�1 1 1 - � �i■■} —r

�
m W 0
V V V w l w O �O ' m V_ m � lli A w N O v m V m In a W N O lO m' V m N A W N F+ O l0
A A 14 A A A 11 A A A N '
an d
7 7' W v 7 � m J J 'V T m m m In p C• 2 m to p r
o m o o m �a m. d x N
a c R 3 3 3>> an a w= :° w =_ ° ^� °
R
c o °° d a °— n d T 3 0
3
f
D t^ O Z Z x 7 M A Gl rr N O O p Z Q N D y
d
N
y N
n m O' C O 'O O T 0 T tD N n m W a 7 0 v O N T T N O O °O 7
a d d ° c a n a f£ �' — n d° c u o£ n d
s m w o d M m T
; Sd�;°AO a
m n V1 C Vf .n fp N cC N R d cep -°i. n O C 3 N n m .1 ° ° .Ot d 3
TxG>>
v
-°°i. 0
o m c3 o s y ci v 3° 3 vt
3
3>>> > vd z '—' m m m° n o w i m v° v
cc v m u+ T d A O w O' T m O
c
N
i 3 m o£ m v T m 1 m s a N C o
N
D N Uc C cc 'O
N X C
p
T
O x O
O 2
=
a o
m N v m
w
.�.
IxD a
0 c
c a a
3
M
N m- N N N F+ N N W N + N W
O
£££ f F F£ F F F o F£££ F F£ f f f f f£ f f f F 0 F F f F F££ d££ f d
O•
c
Jc x" N O N �i" N x x F N� x� N H N � N N N Jc F x F x- Jc' � �c Jc JC H N N N x� °'
1/1 In N N YI '•C N
N N
.�++
O
�
� 9 9? K K 9 9 9 9 9 9 F 9 9 s T 3 s 9 9 99 9 9 3 K 3 3 T s s s T .-ii -1 --4
N G d
N
o o o o 0 o o o 0 o 0 0 0 0 o c c o c o 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o c c c c c c c c o o c o
O 7 O 7 O 7 O 7>> 7>>>> > 7 7 7 7 7 7 O 7 O 7 7 7
m J J m J J J J m m m m
A
y 3
3
3
f+ t.. F+ H+ N m cD V m m m m V J\\ V\ V V m V V m m m m m\\\\\\\\ m m\ m
1-+ F+ F+ O O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
ic- NH
3
Nj
\\\\\ N N m l0 N N N m W N\ m
1•+ N V N m P V \ \ {n W O \ O W F+
_
m m m ro ro m m m m ro ro m m m m
CC CC C CC CS CC C CC CS CC CC Cm!�
T T i i G G G i i i -Ti � Ti -Ti i i G` C M i\ 1 1 G G
T1
O_. �. _. _. _. _. 1 N _ N _. _. �. _. _. _. _. _. _. O O Ic fG fG tD N O _. _. O IU
M
F+ F+ F+ F~+ O O \ 7 1 N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ d °- n d d n d 7 .� d d
�.
\\\\\\ N m m m\ N /+ W N m m W J N N m N m N N 4+ N N m m J J J V J J m N m m
N In F+ \ \ \ N A J \ J \ \ \ \ O O \ O \ N N {A N P \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ \
•
..
\ \ \ F\+ \ i\-� F\+ V m \ 1\+ N m F\+ t~!I ~m {NII i\•+ 1\+ c~0 !\•+ 0~G 1\+ F\+ 1\� F\+ y l~/l 'm\ lNlf tNI1 F~+ 1~+ \ c~c F\+ v W
F+ r+ �•+ m r m mCO m m\ N \ m m m m m m m m\ �•' \\\ \. \ �-+ m •� \
m m m m M m m µ m t ty+ m r r m r` r
J
!J.

-, -..v _ --N — a_. - N --
%
T O O° m�
A 1q 3 A 11 A A 14 A 11 A A 14 A A A A I A A J J J A 19 1, J 1 14 J 4119 '
m�.._N.
m y n y a vim, u�i O N a g a 7 N 6 d o=i N N H N m A fO9 C u o=i ui Z
o o w °�° = = = = �^+ 3
-o -z-o _ow -_-0 0 o as w
o R' ^ d s -� m p ^^ m z O T �^ ro �^ m o^ m s T^ m m o ". ^ m O m
L a o o£ T o a O m S£ d T 0 o o a o m o m 0 o z a O
g ro c a m£ m e 'd T N o d£ 0 e c w ££ o o m c m
_ m 3 -I S� s 3 d s 3 a c oo s 3 '� 0 o :1 T m
0 0 0
N' N a m .moo-..� 5; N a w w o,M �. S �• N a a0e o, z 3 N a
'c" �
d j E ,C M d < T d ,� N d
M m 3 d
3 3
a
x
d
0 3 5 5
N r W W W V r N r N
£ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ f £ £ £ £ £ £ f £ £ £ £ £
01 F N� y F 4Fi JC' H N u�i d F N F N F N N O N N y� d- v-i x u - vFi x H- - -
N N N N N N
3 a 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 a 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m w m m v m m m
\ r O O \ \ \ \ F+ O O O O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N
N \ \ N \ \ N W N 01 Q� \ N r r r r r Ot r N O1 N N \ \ \ \ \ N N 01 01 N t0 (p \ \ \ \
V\\ m A V V O O W\ 0 0\ W W UI N 4+ r m V 0\\ W\\ N W N N
r V \ 01 O1
ro m ro ro ro m m m ro ro ro m m m m u ro m m m
T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T 'fit T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T
ko m P+ w m m -D .+ r �+ r r r w m m m Oo V P. r r N
'.N r ►� O O O O \\\\ r 0 0\\ \\ \\\\\ \ O r r O O O \\ \\\
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ N N r N \ N N r N V F+ W
r r O N V1 r r m r A A p r Uf r m A N A O F+ \ V\ N {p N r N r\ A A O\ O {O N F+ W V
mN \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ r \ r N \ \ l0 01 N r \ \ \ F' \ \ F+ A O \
\\ r\ r\\ F+ r r r\\ r r r
w o m w o m Do m m m m m m m m m m m m m w m m m m m m m m m m m m Oro m
N
V
C
N F+
m
Al -A' �
r
1
a
T �
m
r
A
3 00
y Z
�m
4

d
�'
o�
0
IG gip'
W W W N W W N N N N N N
Lf A W �+ O t0 DO V A W' A
m` 3
■
�H
my.m
d'�
w= a a T= o 0
3
C
O T O N LA
S
O N O O
m c N m Q
w S� M �•
=
O O O
O m N O n 7
�
— N
3 �
N
Jr JC J� �l' JC J� Ji' JC' 7C iC JC F
p i
3 3 3 3 3 a 3 3 3 3 3 3
>>
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m
3 m
N
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
r r r r r r r r r w W co
3
00 r N OD r 00 V O V
O O1 l0 \ N l0 \ In \ \ \ \
A
ro ro r ro ro ro ro
T T T T T T T T T T T T
w 00 00 co cc 00 00 w 00 OrD Oro �
OD 00 00 00 00 00 OD
N
W

Appendix D
Grading Plan

10' ALLEY
(M.B. 230, PG. 81)
I
I
i
APPROXIMATE R/W
12" PVC @ 1% MIN.
729
- 730 �38- I RIM: 726.07 (� NR725.06
23 26 ,
/ f IN A :720.32 ♦ O:723. 6
\ + .16
aft
7� :71717 SIC Cr�r�rr�r�rr-rrt- ir-err-�C�rt�rr�rr�r��
C / 1 �-
731. 731.Y
I
I
731.
RIM
B RIM =XXX
I OUT= 723.6
C12" PVC PIP
/ @MIN. 1%
North AD-6
/ RIM =XXX
FFE: 734.15 OUT= 724.0
,,,o I FIFE: 734.19
12" PVC PIPE
/ I @ MIN. 1%
AD-5
/ RIM =XXX
OUT= 724.30
ooe oo M JB-4
5 732. 2 733.0 733 5 OUT= 728.0
A ,
FFE: 731.73 I I a rr D
I9 , at 734
a I FFE:734.57
\733.4 i
731 5 `732.15 AD-3
RIM=733.85
a ' 73
o OUT= 730.10
733.0 D-2
a 732.8 RIM=733.85
a 732.0 OUT= 730.30
South
0 o i
6"CURB
1
1.72 FFE: 734.08 AD-1
732.15
RIM=733.85
732.2 _ a OUT= 730.5
732.55 f L �1��3440
6"CURB
RIM: 732.78
�g2 IN: 725.38
OUT: 725.23 I j
WEST BLAND STREET
(60' PUBLIC RM)
IN
n
733.5
IF- 7 2.8
CI- CI- 733.11
RIM=733.10 RIM=733.40
734.4 OUT= 730.10 9UT= 729.40 I °
733.55
734.1
e e e I I
- 733
734.1 /
734.2
734
�35 -735.4
r\
1-56
RIM =730.3
O/ 718'10`�3o
RIM: 730.87
I N (A): 725.27
N B : 725.37
OUT: 725.17
(B U
UJ
(A)
/
�/��
Cn
/ 00
�YI-3
20-
RIM=733.30 LI_
OUT= 728.80
J
U
a_
0f
O
I
SPEED H
RIM: 736.
IN: 731.2!
OUT:71.1
c�
U
0
I
RIM:
732.04
\ SDMH
O
RIM:733.05
OUT: 725.70
PROXIMATE R/W
RIM: 741.97
OUT: 733.37
6"CURB
30»C&0 - FO -
FO
PPROXIMATE_�/W - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
\ BOG
ItiIflP AF 27 \ .
GRADING NOTES
1. TOTAL AREA DISTURBED = 0.28 ACRES
2.
ALL PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS REFLECT FINISHED GRADES, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED
30.
COORDINATE ALL CURB AND STREET GRADES IN INTERSECTION WITH INSPECTOR.
OTHERWISE.
31.
ALL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ALONG WEST BLAND ST AND SOUTH CHURCH ST. ARE TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE
3.
ALL ELEVATIONS ARE IN REFERENCE TO THE BENCHMARK, AND THIS MUST BE VERIFIED BY THE GENERAL
CITY OF CHARLOTTE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO GROUND BREAKING.
32.
DEVELOPER WILL PROVIDE STREET SIGNS PER CLDSM# 50.05 (9" SIGNS ONLY)
4.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL
33.
IN ROLLING AND HILLY TERRAINS, SWEEPING OF THE STONE BASE AND/OR APPLICATION OF A TACK COAT MAY
FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND SHALL WAIT FOR INSTRUCTION PRIOR TO
BE REQUIRED NEAR INTERSECTIONS. THESE REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ESTABLISHED BY THE INSPECTOR AND
PROCEEDING.
BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS.
5.
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE FIELD BEFORE BEGINNING
34.
THE PURPOSED OF THE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT (SIDE) IS TO PROVIDE STORM WATER CONVEYANCE.
CONSTRUCTION.
BUILDINGS ARE NOT PERMITTED IN THE EASEMENT AREA. ANY OTHER OBJECTS WHICH IMPEDE STORM WATER
6.
CONTRACTOR SHALL BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE.
FLOW OR SYSTEM MAINTENANCE ARE ALSO PROHIBITED.
7.
ALL FILL TO BE COMPACTED TO 95% A.A.S.H.T.O. STANDARD COMPACTION.
35.
HIGH -DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) STORM DRAINAGE PIPE INSTALLED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED
8.
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SHOWN ARE ON GRADING PLAN ARE BASED UPON THE APPROXIMATE CUT AND FILL
PUBLIC STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE APPROVAL BY THE CITY'S INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ANY BACKFILL BEING
SLOPE LIMITS, OR OTHER GRADING REQUIREMENTS.
PLACED. BACKFILL MATERIAL MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE
9.
THE PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOWN IN DRIVES AND SIDEWALKS ARE TO FINISHED ELEVATIONS (TOP OF
MATERIAL WITHIN THE PUBLIC STREET RIGHT -OF- WAY.
PAVEMENT). REFER TO PAVEMENT CROSS SECTION DATA TO ESTABLISH CORRECT SUB -BASE OR AGGREGATE
36.
PE SEALED SHOP DRAWINGS FOR RETAINING WALL MUST BE SUBMITTED TO CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO
BASE COURSE ELEVATIONS TO BE COMPLETED UNDER THIS CONTRACT.
CONSTRUCTION.
10.
CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE SO THAT RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY FLOW AWAY FROM
37.
"AS -BUILT" DRAWINGS AND PLANS OF THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM, INCLUDING DESIGNED DITCHES, MUST BE
BUILDING(S) AND ACROSS NEW PAVEMENT AND/OR LANDSCAPE AREAS TO NEW OR EXISTING STORM DRAIN
SUBMITTED PRIOR TO SUBDIVISION FINAL INSPECTION TO THE CITY/COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IN
INLETS, DRAINAGE SWALES, OR OVERLAND SHEET FLOW.
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY/COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE.
11.
ALL "CLDSM STD." NUMBERS REFER TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT
38.
NON-STANDARD ITEMS (IE:PAVERS, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, ETC.) IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRE A RIGHT -OF
STANDARDS MANUAL.
-WAY ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE (CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION/NORTH
12.
IN ORDER TO ENSURE PROPER DRAINAGE KEEP A MINIMUM OF 0.5% SLOPE ON ALL GUTTERS.
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION) BEFORE INSTALLATION.
13.
APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN IS NOT AN AUTHORIZATION TO GRADE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. WHEN FIELD
39.
PRIOR TO PLAT RECORDATION, OFFSITE R/W AND/OR CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE
CONDITIONS WARRANT OFF SITE GRADING, PERMISSION MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE AFFECTED PROPERTY
OBTAINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF THE "OFFSITE R/W ACQUISITION PROCESS"/ THESE NEEDED R/W
OWNERS.
AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AREA CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN.
14.
THE DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN EACH STREAM, CREEK, OR BACKWASH CHANNEL IN AN UNOBSTRUCTED STATE
40.
CERTIFICATION AND STREET CUT PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR UTILITY CUTS ON CITY STREETS. ALLOW 7 DAYS
AND SHALL REMOVE FROM THE CHANNEL AND BANKS OF THE STREAM ALL DEBRIS, LOGS, TIMBER, JUNK AND
PROCESSING FOR PERMIT. FOR INFORMATION CONTACT CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OTHER ACCLAMATIONS.
(704-336-4025) OR http://www.charmeck.org/Deparments/Transportation/Street+Maintenance/Home.htm.
WARNING!
15.
THERE WILL BE NO ON -SITE OR OFF -SITE BURIAL AREAS OR BORROW SITES FOR THIS PROJECT, UNLESS SHOWN
ON THE GRADING PLAN.
16.
ON -SITE BURIAL PITS REQUIRE AN ON -SITE DEMOLITION LANDFILL PERMIT FROM THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR.
...,: ..........
17.
GRADING MORE THAN ONE ACRE WITHOUT AN APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN IS A VIOLATION OF THE CITY/
COUNTY EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.
18.
SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED NO STEEPER THAN 2:1. FILL SLOPES GREATER THAN 10, REQUIRE ADEQUATE
TERRACING PER CLDSM #30.16.
19.
SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY IF DEEMED NECESSARY
BY THE INSPECTOR.
20.
SOIL CLASSIFICATION:Ur
21.
ANY ADDITIONAL CLEARING OR GRADING REQUIRED FOR STOCKPILES OR BURIAL PITS WILL BE COORDINATED IN
Q
s:
THE FIELD WITH THE EROSION CONTROL OFFICER WHO WILL DETERMINE APPROPRIATE EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES FOR SAME.
22.
ANY ON -SITE DEMOLITION LANDFILLS OR STUMP HOLES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 100, FROM ANY EXTERIOR
PROPERTY LINES.
23.
ALL EXISTING CONTOURS ARE SHOWN AT V INTERVALS WHILE PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE SHOWN AT 2'
INTERVALS.
24.
THE DENUDED AREA LIMIT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN IS THE MAXIMUM AREA TO BE CLEARED. THE SURVEYOR SHALL
CALL NC ONE CALL
DETERMINE ACTUAL REQUIRED CLEARING LIMITS.
25.
REFER TO EROSION CONTROL NOTES FOR STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS.
BEFORE YOU DIG
26.
ANY LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITY 1 ACRE OR GREATER REQUIRES COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CONDITIONS OF THE
GENERAL PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION
SYSTEM (PERMIT NO. NCGO 10000). ANY PERMIT NONCOMPLIANCE IS A VIOLATION OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT
STOP
AND MAY REQUIRE ENFORCEMENT ACTION BY THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH,
AND NATURAL RESOURCES. (FOR QUESTIONS CONTACT MOORESVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE WATER QUALITY STAFF
AT (704-663-1699).
800- 632-4941
27 .
MAINTAINNA
THEDEVICES SHALL
INSPECTED AT LOEAST ONCE PER WE KSHALL DOTOR AFITEER EVERY 0.5ALL1ON INCHEES OF RAICONTROLD FALL TO ENSURE THEIRBE
AVOID UTILITY DAMAGE
EFFECTIVENESS. ANY NEEDEED REPAIRS SHALL BE PERFORMED IMMEDIATELY.
28.
ANY GRADING BEYOND THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, SHOWN ON THE PLAN, IS A VIOLATION OF THE
CITY/COUNTY EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE, AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.
29.
CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT AS -BUILT DATA SEALED BY A NC REGISTERED SURVEYOR FOR STORM DRAINAGE
WITHIN PUBLIC STREET RIGHT OF WAYS.
STORM DRAINAGE NOTES:
1. AD= AREA DRAINS TO BE 12"X12" NDS DRAINAGE BASIN WITH FLAT GRATE, OR APPROVED
EQUAL. PIPE TO BE 12" SCH 40 PVC.
LEGEND
SS EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
w EXISTING WATER LINE
- - - - EXISTING SETBACK LINE
om==mmo PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE
PIPE & STRUCTURE
This Plan Is A
Preliminary Design.
NOT Released For
Construction.
0 20' 40' 80'
SCALE: 1 "=20'
REVISIONS:
(A J
=heC a
L z
z
0:3Q
OY
L 0
0
W
C: >'
oo_j
Av/' H
W N
JO W
V
Q
a
0
Z
H
Q
LLI
OC
V
w
r�
V /
Lo
w
w
U
o
N
Z
Z
U)
w
O
Q
Z
O
Q
J
w
V
Z_
�
U
Z
W
p
w
N
w
ry
N
CY)
CY)
IV v
00
coco
o®
VNJ
L.L
w
Z
L.L
J
VrU)^
D
Z
CD
Z
75
GRADING PLAN
100% DD
M-D-yy
CORPORATE CERTIFICATIONS
NC PE: C-2930 NC LA: C-253
SC ENG : NO. 3599 SC LA: NO. 211
Project Manager: MDL
Drawn By: MDL
Checked By: MDL
Date: 3/16/18
Project Number: 17049
Sheet Number:
a l I I SHEET # 5 OF 9

Appendix E
TCLP Lead Laboratory Report

,con -testy
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street' East Longmeadow, MA 01028 . FAX [phone] ` TEL. [phone]
April 25, 2018
Ralph McGee
Hart & Hickman - Charlotte, NC
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
Project Location: Charlotte, NC
Client Job Number:
Project Number: MGN-002
Laboratory Work Order Number: 18D0782
Enclosed are results of analyses for samples received by the laboratory on April 18, 2018. If you have any questions concerning
this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kerry K. McGee
Project Manager
Page 1 of 17

Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Sample Summary
Case Narrative
Sample Results
18D0782-01
18D0782-02
Sample Preparation Information
QC Data
TCLP - Metals Analyses
B201383
Flag/Qualifier Summary
Certifications
Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt
3
4
5
5
7
9
10
10
10
11
12
13
Page 2 of 17

Table of Contents
40 ,con -testy
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
39 Spruce StreetEast Longmeadow, MA 01028 . FAX [phone] ` TEL. [phone]
Hart & Hickman - Charlotte, NC
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 REPORT DATE: 4/25/2018
Charlotte, NC 28203 PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER:
ATTN: Ralph McGee
PROJECT NUMBER: MGN-002
ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
WORK ORDER NUMBER: 18DO782
The results of analyses performed on the following samples submitted to the CON -TEST Analytical Laboratory are found in this report.
PROJECT LOCATION: Charlotte, NC
FIELD SAMPLE # LAB ID: MATRIX SAMPLE DESCRIPTION TEST SUB LAB
SB-6 (0-1) 18D0782-01 Soil SM 254OG
SW-846 601OC-D
DUP-01 18DO782-02 Soil SM 254OG
SW-846 601OC-D
Page 3 of 17

,con -testy
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street' East Longmeadow, MA 01028 . FAX [phone] ` TEL. [phone]
CASE NARRATIVE SUMMARY
All reported results are within defined laboratory quality control objectives unless listed below or otherwise qualified in this report.
SW-846 6010C/D SW-846 6020A/B
For NC, Metals methods SW-846 6010D and SW-846 6020B are followed, and for all other states methods SW-846 6010C and SW-846 6020A are followed.
The results of analyses reported only relate to samples submitted to the Con -Test Analytical Laboratory for testing.
I certify that the analyses listed above, unless specifically listed as subcontracted, if any, were performed under my direction according to the approved methodologies listed
in this document, and that based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete.
Lisa A. Worthington
Project Manager
Page 4 of 17

Table of Contents
icon-te w
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Project Location: Charlotte, NC Sample Description: Work Order: 18D0782
Date Received: 4/18/2018
Field Sample #: SB-6 (0-1) Sampled: 3/8/2018 11:25
Samnle ID: 18D0782-01
Samnle Matrix: Soil
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total)
Date Date/Time
Analyte Results RL Units Dilution Flag/Qual Method Prepared Analyzed Analyst
% Solids 72.3 % Wt 1
SM 2540G 4/6/18 4/20/18 9:27 MRL
Page 5 of 17

Table of Contents
icon-te w
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Project Location: Charlotte, NC Sample Description: Work Order: 18D0782
Date Received: 4/18/2018
Field Sample #: SB-6 (0-1) Sampled: 3/8/2018 11:25
Sample ID: 18D0782-01
Samnle Matrix: Soil
TCLP - Metals Analyses
Date Date/Time
Analyte Results RL DL Units Dilution Flag/Qual Method Prepared Analyzed Analyst
Lead
29 0.10 0.044 mg/L 10
SW-846 6010C-D 4/19/18 4/23/18 15:38 QNW
Page 6 of 17

Table of Contents
icon-te w
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Project Location: Charlotte, NC Sample Description: Work Order: 18D0782
Date Received: 4/18/2018
Field Sample #: DUP-01 Sampled: 3/8/2018 00:00
Samnle ID: 18D0782-02
Samnle Matrix: Soil
Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total)
Date Date/Time
Analyte Results RL Units Dilution Flag/Qual Method Prepared Analyzed Analyst
% Solids 77.6 % Wt 1
SM 2540G 4/6/18 4/20/18 9:27 MRL
Page 7 of 17

Table of Contents
icon-te w
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
Project Location: Charlotte, NC Sample Description: Work Order: 18D0782
Date Received: 4/18/2018
Field Sample #: DUP-01 Sampled: 3/8/2018 00:00
Sample ID: 18D0782-02
Samnle Matrix: Soil
TCLP - Metals Analyses
Date Date/Time
Analyte Results RL DL Units Dilution Flag/Qual Method Prepared Analyzed Analyst
Lead
11 0.10 0.044 mg/L 10
SW-846 6010C-D 4/19/18 4/23/18 15:45 QNW
Page 8 of 17

Table of Contents
,con -testy
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
39 Spruce Street' East Longmeadow, MA 01028 . FAX [phone] ` TEL. [phone]
Sample Extraction Data
Prep Method: % Solids-SM 2540G
Lab Number [Field ID]
Batch
Date
18D0782-01 [SB-6 (0-1)]
B198626
04/06/18
18D0782-02 [DUP-01]
B198626
04/06/18
Prep Method: SW-846 3010A-SW-846 6010C-D
Leachates were extracted on 4/18/2018 per SW-846 1311 in Batch B201258
Lab Number [Field ID]
Batch Initial [mL] Final [mL]
Date
18D0782-01 [SB-6 (0-1)]
B201383 50.0 50.0
04/19/18
18D0782-02 [DUP-01]
B201383 50.0 50.0
04/19/18
Page 9 of 17

Table of Contents
,con -testy
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
39 Spruce Street' East Longmeadow, MA 01028 . FAX [phone] ` TEL. [phone]
QUALITY CONTROL
TCLP - Metals Analyses - Quality Control
Reporting Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyte Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Batch B201383 - SW-846 3010A
Blank (B201383-BLK1) Prepared: 04/19/18 Analyzed: 04/20/18
Lead ND 0.010 mg/L
LCS (B201383-BS1) Prepared: 04/19/18 Analyzed: 04/20/18
Lead 0.439 0.010 mg/L 0.500 87.8 80-120
LCS Dup (B201383-BSD1) Prepared: 04/19/18 Analyzed: 04/20/18
Lead 0.504 0.010 mg/L 0.500 101 80-120 13.7 20
Page 10 of 17

,con -testy
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX [phone] * TEL. [phone]
FLAG/QUALIFIER SUMMARY
* QC result is outside of established limits.
fi Wide recovery limits established for difficult compound.
$ Wide RPD limits established for difficult compound.
# Data exceeded client recommended or regulatory level
ND Not Detected
RL Reporting Limit is at the level of quantitation (LOQ)
DL Detection Limit is the lower limit of detection determined by the MDL study
MCL Maximum Contaminant Level
Percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) are determined by the software using values in the
calculation which have not been rounded.
No results have been blank subtracted unless specified in the case narrative section.
Page 11 of 17

,con -testy
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
Table of Contents
39 Spruce Street' East Longmeadow, MA 01028 . FAX [phone] ` TEL. [phone]
CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Analyses included in this Report
Analyte Certifications
SW-846 6010C-D in Water
Lead NY,CT,ME,NC,NH,VA
The CON -TEST Environmental Laboratory operates under the following certifications and accreditation:
Code
Description
Number
Expires
AIHA
AIHA-LAP, LLC - ISO17025:2005
100033
03/1/2020
MA
Massachusetts DEP
M-MA100
06/30/2018
CT
Connecticut Department of Publilc Health
PH-0567
09/30/2019
NY
New York State Department of Health
10899 NELAP
04/1/2019
NH-S
New Hampshire Environmental Lab
2516 NELAP
02/5/2019
RI
Rhode Island Department of Health
LA000112
12/30/2018
NC
North Carolina Div. of Water Quality
652
12/31/2018
NJ
New Jersey DEP
MA007 NELAP
06/30/2018
FL
Florida Department of Health
E871027 NELAP
06/30/2018
VT
Vermont Department of Health Lead Laboratory
LL015036
07/30/2018
ME
State of Maine
2011028
06/9/2019
VA
Commonwealth of Virginia
460217
12/14/2018
NH-P
New Hampshire Environmental Lab
2557 NELAP
09/6/2018
VT-DW
Vermont Department of Health Drinking Water
VT-255716
06/12/2018
NC-DW
North Carolina Department of Health
25703
07/31/2018
Page 12 of 17

C
C
�
O
U
a
N.
N
O
O
c
�l
M
z
a
C
1
[I
Table of Contents
iA
L
C7
10
U. CO
0
x in
C�'1:11
.Zit
.fln:4i.1.
•aii 'C
:L75�-�
'. �i0
�
_W �Iq �r+d •7-9
Z
ai
::u Q0Zn
n
5U
Cu
n11�
T z�, cQc
0
¢7L.
liV
c0G
U"pC6
li j
.; II t>.3.
c
ljE •IF I3 It 11 it
.0
¢dV)
IE 1
7
.'y-
.-.
CC�i7�t
us v,p1J1
v
--'.,11.
T.11 .6
2In 0x P
!=
C
O
❑
C
D eC
s
n
�i i
L..._�
`
o U
r
O
l
A!
"D
O p
¢
U
.,
Q A
JE
�i
W
1
9
El
El
u-
jT
O
T.
E
r
2
�-
O
�
�
p
L
a s
a
a
o
v
N
0
a
1
N
Q
m 00
(n -
a 00
J
U �
CL
cat uc[v- Fzi�
L/
i
a �
o W
Page 14 of 17

Table of Contents
3/10/2018
Track your package or shipment with FedEx Tracking
IMPORTANT!
FedEx is closely monitoring the winter storms across the Northeastern region of the U.S. Learn More
5 Piece shipment
Travel History
a. DatelTime Activity
Location
. 3/1012018 - Saturday
1010 am Delivered
8.34 am At local FedEx fa6ily
nr,csea; _.ca
7.13am At destination sort facility
easr;;enusrcz
4.06 am Departed FedEx €ocation
3/0912018 - Friday
11:27 pm Arrived at FedEx location
rdrr'4P"6. TI
9,11 pm left FedEx origfrr fac[lity
cr€nhLolrr--_ no
5 26 pm Rcked up
cntiRro�r_, c.
4.03 pm Shipment information sent to FedEx
Shipment Facts
Tracking (dumber 771768209515
Service
FedEx Priority Overnight
Master tracking 771768209515
weight
I() Ibs 14,54 kgs
number
Delivered To
ShippinglReceiving
Dimensions 24xi4x14 in.
Total shipment weight
50 ihs 122.68 kgs
Total pieces 5
Packaging
Your Packaging
Terms Third Parity
Standard a
3110I2018 by 12:OE1 Pm
Special handling For Saturday Delivery, Additional
transit
section Handling Surcharge
OUR cOMPANY
About FedEx
3
Our Portfolio
Investor Relations
Careers
I
FedEx Blog
Corporate Responsibility
Newsroom
Contact Us
MORE FROM FEDEX
FedEx Compatible
Developer Resource Center
https:llwww.fedex.com/apps/fedextrack/?action=track&tracknumbers=771768209515&locale=en_US&cntry_code=us Page 15 of 17

3/10/2018 Track your package or shipment with FedEx Tracking Table of Contents
IMPORTANT!
FedEx is closely monitoring the winter storms across the Northeastern region of the U.S. Learn More
Ship date:
Acival delivery.
Fri 310912018 Sat 3110/2018 10:20 am
CHARLDTTE, NC US Delivered PAST" LONGMEADOW. MA US
Signed for by
5 Piece shipment
Travel History
DatefriLne Activity
Location
m 311of2018 - Saturday
MA
10:20 an, Deivered
E1,S7 L,NGr'!EA.7-C 1:
920 ant On FedEx vehicle for delivery
8:32 am At ioca[ FedEx facility
C-
7A 3 am At destination sort farlfity
si r SIN r,
4:06 am mepaded FedEx [oration
3109/2018 - Friday
11:27 pn1 Arrived at FedEx loration
SEW Hr - Tr,
ClVrikl.:�T7:;. 1�C
9:11 pm Left FedEx origin facility
5:26 pm Picked up
CIIARLOTTc NC
4:03 pm Shipment information sent to FedEx
Shipment Facts
Tracking Number 771768209905
Service
FedEx Priority Overnight
Master tracking 771768200515
weight
10 Ibs 14.54 kgs
number
Delivered To
Shipping/Receiving
Dimensions 24x14x f 4 in.
Total shipment weight
10 lbs 14.54 kgs
Total pieces 5
Packaging
Your Packaging
Terms Third Party
Standard a::
11012018 by 12:00 pm
Special handling For Saturday Delivery. Additional
transit
section Hann€ing Surcharge
OUR COMPANY
1s
About FedEx
Our Portfolio
Investor Relations
t
Careers
FedEx Blog
Corporate Responsibility
Newsroom
Contact Us
MORE FROM FEDEX
FedEx Compatible
Developer Resource Center
Page 16 of 17
https://www.fedex.com/apps/fedextrackt?action=track&tracknumbers=771768209905&locale=en_US&cn"_code=us

Table of Contents
Client
Received By
Date
How were the samples In Cooler No Cooler
received? Direct from Sampling
B Gun #
Time i � ` )
On Ice -T No Ice
Am bient Melted ice
Actual Tem
Were samples within
y
Temperature? 2-6°C -T
By Blank #
Actual Temp -
Was Custody Seal Intact?
Were Samples Tampered with?
Was COC Relinquished ?
_
Does Chain Agree With Samples? i
Are there broken/leaking/loose caps on any samples? V.
Is COC in ink/ Legible? i
Were samples received within holding time?
Did COC include all Client
T
Analysis Sampler Name T
pertinent Information? Project
ID's Collection Dates/Times_
Are Sample labels filled out and legible?
-T
Are there Lab to Filters?
Who was notified?
Are there Rushes?
Who was notified?
Are there Short Holds?
Who was notified?
Is there enough Volume?
Is there Headspace where applicable?
4, l
MS/MSD?
Proper Media/Containers Used?
i
Is splitting samples required?
Were trip blanks received?
On COC? -T
Do all samples have the proper pH?
Acid �.= Base

Appendix F
Contingency Plan

Contingency Plan
Wepak Property
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 21048-17-060
H&H Job No. MGN.002
This Contingency Plan is being provided as required by Part 9 of the NC DEQ template
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for future redevelopment at the Wepak Property
Brownfields property located in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (Site).
Current redevelopment plans for the Site include renovation of the existing Site buildings
for commercial uses and Site work activities such as concrete footing repair/replacement,
utility installations, and shallow grading for paved parking areas.
Contingency Actions
During construction activities, contractors may encounter unknown sub -surface
environmental conditions (i.e., tanks, drums, or waste materials) that if encountered,
will require proper management. Prior to beginning Site work, H&H will attend a pre -
construction kick-off meeting with the PD and the redevelopment contractors to
discuss the DEQ approved EMP and various scenarios when it would be appropriate
and necessary to notify H&H of the discovery of unknown subsurface features or
potentially impacted media at the Site.
In the event that such conditions are encountered during Site development activities,
the environmental actions noted below will be used to direct environmental actions to
be taken during these activities and sampling data for potentially impacted soil and the
disposition of impacted soil will be provided to DEQ when the data becomes available.
1. If excavation into buried wastes or significantly impacted soils occurs, the
contractor is instructed to stop work in that location and notify the environmental
consultant. The environmental consultant will review the materials and collect
samples if warranted. In this event, confirmation sampling will be conducted at

representative locations in the base and the sidewalls of the excavation after the
waste or significantly impacted soil is removed. The confirmation samples will be
analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and the RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium.
Areas of suspected contaminated soil that remain at the Site after excavation is
complete above the DEQ IHSB Industrial/Commercial Use PSRGs will be
managed pursuant to this plan and incorporated into the Brownfields plat.
2. If determined to be warranted, confirmation samples will also be used to determine
the appropriate corrective measure for soil beyond the excavation limits required
for grading and/or utility line installation or removal. Such corrective measures are
specified in the items below.
3. If a sub -grade feature or pit is encountered and does not require removal for
geotechnical or construction purposes, it will be filled with soil or suitable fill and
construction will proceed. Where appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before
back filling to prevent fluid accumulation. If the pit has waste in it, the waste may
be set aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste disposal purposes for
TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, and TCLP metals and disposed off -Site at a suitable
permitted facility or the waste will be managed in accordance with Paragraph 3 of
this section above, whichever is most applicable based on the type of waste present.
If the pit must be removed and the observed waste characteristics indicate the
concrete may potentially be contaminated to a significant degree, the concrete will
be sampled and analyzed by methods specified by the disposal facility.
4. If buried piping is encountered and must be removed to allow installation to
proceed, the contractor will inspect the pipe for fluids, collect the fluids where
appropriate, and look for signs of a release using field methods. The collected
fluids will be sampled for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals to determine
appropriate disposition of the fluid.

5. In the event that soil within an excavation cannot be dried adequately for
construction purposes using the methods described above, the soil may be
amended with clean soil, aggregate, drying agents, and/or stabilizing agents to
achieve the desired geotechnical qualities or placed within the void space beneath
impervious surface cover. Amendment may be conducted inside or outside the
excavation and the material replaced into the excavation. If an amendment is used,
the type of amendment will be provided to DEQ for approval prior to its use. DEQ
will be notified prior to movement of the soil to other areas at the Site if results of
laboratory analysis for soil samples collected from the excavation indicate that
compound concentrations are detected above Industrial/Commercial Use PSRGs
(other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are
consistent with Site -specific background levels for metals).
6. In the event that impacts associated with an UST release are found to be present on
the subject Site, they will be addressed through the Brownfields Program.