08022_Reeves Rpt- I-85 N Bridge Assessment Revised Report 2016.09.28

September 28, 2016
Dan Leaver, PE, Assoc. DBIA Senior Project Manager City of Charlotte - Engineering & Property Management
600 E 4th Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
and
Ms. Michelle Podeszwa
HDR Engineering Inc. of the Carolinas 128 South Tryon Street, Suite 1400 Charlotte, North Carolina
Reference: Report of Environmental Services I-85 N. BridgeCharlotte, Mecklenburg County, North CarolinaECS Project: 49:2562
Dear Mr. Leaver and Ms. Podeszwa:
As authorized by your acceptance of ECS Proposal No. 49:1308P Rev2 dated June 22, 2016,
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) has completed the Report Environmental Services for the above-referenced site. Included in this report is a description of the field activities, the results obtained,
and our conclusions and recommendations.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services to you. If there are questions regarding
this report, or a need for further information, please contact us at [phone].
Respectfully submitted,
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
Chris Orrell Brian Olin, P.G., CPG Staff Geologist Senior Environmental Project Manager
[e-mail] [e-mail] 704-525-5152 704-525-5152
John M. Stewart, P.G.
Principal Geologist [e-mail]
336-668-9114
Report of Environmental Services
I-85 N. Bridge
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project: 49:2562
September 28, 2016
1

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ........................................................................................ 2
2. FIELD ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................. 2
3. LABORATORY ANALYSIS ................................................................................................. 4
4. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................. 4
5. RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................... 5
6. QUALIFICATIONS OF REPORT ........................................................................................ 5
FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Proposed Sample Location Map
Figure 3 Sample Location Map
TABLES

Table 1 Summary of Soil Sample Analytical Results Table 2 Summary of Groundwater Sample Analytical Results
Table 3 Summary of Surface Water Sample Analytical Results
APPENDIX

Appendix A Site Photographs Appendix B Boring Logs and Temporary Well Diagrams
Appendix C Laboratory Analytical Results and Chain of Custody
Report of Sampling Assessment
I-85 N. Bridge
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project: 49:2562
September 28, 2016
2

1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The project is located at Research Drive and Louis Rose Place, near I-85 between Research
Drive and JW Clay Boulevard in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (Figure 1). ECS understands that the subject site is located on a larger property known as the Polymer
Center of Excellence facility and/or the Reeves Site. Tetrachloroethylene impacts have been
identified in the groundwater at this property. A Brownfields Agreement is in place for this property through the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Brownfields
Program.
Based on the scope of work provided by HDR Engineering Inc. of the Carolinas (HDR), ECS
proposed to complete a Phase II Assessment to further define and delineate any residual contamination that may exist on-site.
2. FIELD ACTIVITIES
The environmental services originally consisted of collecting six soil samples, two surface water
samples (SW-1 and SW-2), and thirteen groundwater samples from six temporary wells (TW-1 through TW-6) and seven pre-existing monitoring wells (MW-3, MW-4, MW-5A, MW-5B, MW-
5C, MW-6, and MW-7. ECS discovered an eighth monitoring well (MW-8) during the site visit,
and three of the wells could not be sampled (MW-4, MW-5A were dry and MW-7 was flush mounted and in an area of heavy vegetation and could not be located), so a total of eleven
groundwater samples were collected. The soil samples were collected and the temporary wells were installed using a Geoprobe® drill. The subcontractor used for this project was 3-D Environmental. Photographs of the site and site work are included in Appendix A.
Prior to commencing with field activities, ECS contacted North Carolina One Call and Priority Locate to locate/mark public utilities at the site. Required separation distances between
subsurface activities and marked utilities (typically 30-inches) were maintained during the field activities.

As part of this assessment, ECS prepared a site-specific health and safety plan (HASP) for the site. The HASP documented the known or suspected hazards, applicable personal protective
equipment (PPE) of site personnel, and emergency response procedures. Prior to commencing
with field activities, ECS and its subcontractors and applicable site personnel reviewed the site-specific HASP.
2.1 Soil Sample Collection

Each soil boring was advanced by hydraulically driving a five-foot long, 1.5-inch soil sampling probe into the soil. Prior to advancing each boring, the down hole equipment and Geoprobe® drill rig were decontaminated utilizing a high pressure steam cleaner that utilized municipal
water. The down hole equipment and drill rig were decontaminated to prevent cross-contamination between boring locations. The soil sampling probe is lined with a disposable clear plastic tube, which is replaced with each five-foot interval. After the probe is driven, the clear
plastic tube filled with soil is removed from the probe. The clear plastic tube is then cut open to remove the soil. ECS visually classified the soils collected from each boring and screened the
soil samples for relative levels of volatile organic vapors using a field screening instrument.
3
Report of Sampling Assessment
I-85 N. Bridge
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project: 49:2562
September 28, 2016
Boring logs, which include descriptions of the soils encountered and field screening results, were prepared for each boring and are included in Appendix B. Upon completion, each boring
was properly abandoned.
Each soil sample collected in the field was transferred into a new, clean resealable bag (half full),
and the bag placed in a warm location. Approximately ten minutes after the time of collection, the bag was opened slightly and the probe of a (Rae Systems Mini Rae 3000) was inserted, and the bag immediately resealed using finger pressure. The meter of the PID was monitored and the
reading recorded. The recorded PID responses are presented on the boring logs included in Appendix B.
The soil samples were placed into laboratory prepared containers. The sample containers were labeled with ECS project number, sample identification, sample date and time, and requested
analytical analysis. The containers were placed into protective packaging material and placed
into a cooler with ice to maintain the samples at approximately 4° Celsius (C°). The samples
were submitted to Prism Laboratories located in Charlotte, North Carolina (North Carolina Certification # 402) for chemical analysis for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Semi-
Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) using EPA Method 8260 and 8270. ECS maintained
proper chain-of-custody (COC) procedures throughout the sample collection and transportation process. Copies of the COCs are included in Appendix C.
2.2 Groundwater Sample Collection
The temporary monitoring wells were installed in the borings drilled as discussed above. The
temporary wells were constructed with one-inch I.D. Schedule 40 PVC flush-threaded casing and screen. The PVC screen and casing was lowered into the open borehole. A ten-foot length of
slotted well screen with machined 0.010-inch slot widths and a threaded bottom plug were installed
at the bottom of each well. The screens were installed to a depth such that the screened interval intersected the estimated groundwater surface. The depths of the temporary wells ranged form 12
to 35 feet below ground surface (bgs). A solid section of PVC casing was placed above the
screened interval and extended to a point just below the ground surface. The annular space around each well was filled with washed and graded medium sand to approximately two feet above
the top of the screen. A minimum two-foot thick seal of bentonite was placed immediately above the sand pack where able. A temporary monitoring well construction diagram was prepared for each temporary monitoring well, which are included in Appendix B. The temporary wells were
sampled using a peristaltic pump with dedicated polyethylene tubing.
The pre-existing monitoring wells were purged by removing at least three well volumes or until
dryness twice. After the purging was completed, groundwater samples were collected from the wells. Purging and sampling was accomplished using either a peristaltic pump with dedicated
polyethylene tubing or a new disposable polypropylene bailer. Immediately after collection, the
groundwater samples were transferred into sample containers provided by the laboratory.
The groundwater samples were placed into laboratory prepared containers. The sample
containers were labeled with ECS project number, sample identification, sample date and time,
and requested analytical analysis. The containers were placed into protective packaging
material and placed into a cooler with ice to maintain the samples at approximately 4° Celsius
(C°). The samples were submitted to Prism Laboratories located in Charlotte, North Carolina
4
Report of Sampling Assessment
I-85 N. Bridge
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project: 49:2562
September 28, 2016
(North Carolina Certification # 402) for chemical analysis for VOCs and SVOCs using EPA Method 8260 and 8270. ECS maintained proper COC procedures throughout the sample
collection and transportation process. Copies of the COCs are included in Appendix C.
2.3 Surface Water Sample Collection
The surface water samples were collected by lowering a laboratory prepared non-preserved glass container into the surface water at an area of low flow. The collected surface water
samples were then decanted into the laboratory prepared sample containers applicable to
analytical method.
The surface water samples were placed into laboratory prepared containers. The sample
containers were labeled with ECS project number, sample identification, sample date and time,
and requested analytical analysis. The containers were placed into protective packaging material and placed into a cooler with ice to maintain the samples at approximately 4° Celsius (C°). The samples were submitted to Prism Laboratories located in Charlotte, North Carolina
(North Carolina Certification # 402) for chemical analysis for VOCs and SVOCs using EPA
Method 8260 and 8270. ECS maintained proper COC procedures throughout the sample
collection and transportation process. Copies of the COCs are included in Appendix C.
3. LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Laboratory analysis of soil, groundwater, and surface water samples SS-1, SS-2, SS-2, SS-4, SS-6, TW-1, TW-5, SW-1, and SW-2 did not detect targeted analytes (VOCs or SVOCs) above
laboratory detection limits.
Laboratory analysis of soil and groundwater samples SS-5, TW-2, TW-3, TW-4, TW-5, and MW-
3, detected multiple VOCs above laboratory detection limits; however, the concentrations do not exceed the applicable North Carolina standards.
Laboratory analysis of groundwater samples MW-5B, MW-5C, MW-6, and MW-8 detected tetrachloroethylene (PCE) above the North Carolina 2L Groundwater Standard. These concentrations are generally consistent with the historical levels detected during the last
Brownfield groundwater monitoring event conducted in 2014.
A summary of the laboratory analytical results is included in Tables 1, 2, and 3. The laboratory
data sheets are included in Appendix C.
4. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the field observation and laboratory analytical results of the soil samples collected
during this assessment, ECS concludes the following:
•Groundwater was encountered at depths ranging from six to thirty feet bgs.
•Drilling refusal was encountered in one of the borings (SS-6) at an approximate depth of
twelve feet bgs.
Report of Sampling Assessment
I-85 N. Bridge
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project: 49:2562
September 28, 2016
5
•Impacts to soil or surface water were not identified in the samples collected.
•Laboratory analysis of groundwater samples detected targeted analytes (PCE) atconcentrations that exceed the North Carolina 2L Groundwater Standard in four of the pre-
existing monitoring wells, and at concentrations consistent with the levels previouslyidentified in the Brownfield Agreement. The concentrations are not above the North
Carolina vapor intrusion screening levels for non-residential sites.
5.RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the results of the assessment, ECS recommends the following:
•Additional assessment does not appear necessary and is not recommended.
•ECS recommends that the current property owner be notified and that they submit a copy ofthe report to the North Carolina Brownfields Department for their records.
6.QUALIFICATIONS OF REPORT
The activities and evaluative approaches used in this assessment are consistent with those
normally employed in environmental assessment projects of this type. Our evaluation of site conditions has been based on our understanding of the site project information and the data
obtained during our field activities. Based on the field observation and laboratory analytical
FIGURES
SOURCE:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
DERITA
NORTH CAROLINA QUADRANGLES
DATED 2016
SCALE: 1 : 24,000
FIGURE 1
SITE LOCATION MAP
I-85 N. BRIDGE SITE
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT: 49:2562
SITE
SOURCE:
City of Charlotte Provide Aerial With
Proposed Sample Locations
SCALE:
Not to Scale
FIGURE 2
PROPOSEDSAMPLE LOCATION MAP
I-85 N. BRIDGE SITE
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG
COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT: 49:2562
SITE
LEGEND
Proposed Approximate Location of Soil Sample
Proposed Approximate Location of Surface Water Sample
Sample Locations to be Combined
Existing Monitoring Well
SOURCE:
Google Earth, 2015

SCALE:
Not to Scale

FIGURE 3
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
I-85 N. BRIDGE SITE
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG
COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT: 49:2562
LEGEND
Approximate Location of Soil Sample
Approximate Location of Surface Water Sample
Existing Monitoring Well
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5A
MW-5B
MW-5C
MW-6
MW-8
SS-3/TW-3
SS-4/TW-4
SS-5/TW-5
SS-6/TW-6
SW-1
SW-2
SS-2/TW-2
SS-1/TW-1
TABLES
ParameterSample IDSS-1SS-2SS-3SS-4SS-5SS-6Collection Depth (feet bgs)30'20'18'6'5'10'Collection Date8/24/168/24/168/24/168/24/168/25/168/25/16Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MSTotal SVOCsBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRL------Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MSAcetoneBRLBRLBRLBRL0.2BRL2412,200 100,000Methylene ChlorideBRLBRLBRLBRL0.0034BRL0.02357640Notes:Results presented in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), analogous to parts per million (ppm)Feet bgs = Feet below ground surfaceBRL = Compound not detected at a concentration above the method reporting limitPSRG = Prelimianary Soil Remediation GoalBold text if present denotes concentration exceeds the North Carolina Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRG)TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTSI-85 N. BRIDGECHARLOTTE, MACKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAECS PROJECT NO. 49-2562North Carolina Protection of Groundwater PSRGANALYTICAL RESULTSCOMPARISION CRITERIAResidential PSRGCommercial/ Industrial PSRG
ParameterSample IDTW-1TW-2TW-3TW-4TW-5TW-6MW-3 MW-5B MW-5C MW-6MW-8Collection Date8/24/16 8/24/16 8/24/16 8/24/16 8/25/16 8/25/16 8/25/16 8/25/16 8/25/16 8/25/16 8/25/16Groundwater Depth (ft.)30.8020.1518.306.005.8011.7022.5028.3028.8010.0018.50Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MSTotal SVOCsBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRL------Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MSChloroformBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRL0.77BRLBRL7070,00035.5Methylene ChlorideBRL1.30.63 J0.55 JBRLBRL0.62 JBRLBRLBRL0.89 J55,0003,960TetrachloroethyleneBRLBRLBRLBRLBRL0.51BRL2.82.8128.10.770048.4TrichloroethyleneBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRLBRL0.7233,0004.35Notes:Results presented in micrograms per liter (ug/L), analogous to parts per billion (ppb)BRL = Compound not detected at a concentration above the method reporting limitBold text if present denotes concentration exceeds the NC2L Groundwater StandardsJ = Estimated ConcentrationCOMPARISION CRITERIANC2L Groundwater StandardsNC Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening LevelsNC Gross Contamination LevelsTABLE 2: SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTSI-85 N. BRIDGECHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINAECS PROJECT NO. 49-2562ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Parameter COMPARISION
CRITERIA
Sample ID SW-1 SW-2
Collection Date 8/25/16 8/25/16
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Total SVOCs BRL BRL --
Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Total VOCs BRL BRL --
Notes:
Results presented in micrograms per liter (ug/L), analogous to parts per billion (ppb)
BRL = Compound not detected at a concentration above the method reporting limit
Bold text if present denotes concentration exceeds the NC2AC 2B Freshwater Aquatic Life Criteria
NCAC 2B Freshwater
Aquatic Life Surface
Criteria
I-85 N. BRIDGE
ECS PROJECT NO. 49-2562
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
TABLE 3: SUMMARY OF SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

APPENDIX A

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

I-85 N. BRIDGE EXTENSION
RESEARCH DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT: 49:2562

Photograph 1: Typical view of cleared portion of site

Photograph 2: Typical view of wooded portion of site

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

I-85 N. BRIDGE EXTENSION
RESEARCH DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT: 49:2562

Photograph 3:Typical view of drilling operations

Photograph 4: Typical view of permanent monitoring well

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS

I-85 N. BRIDGE EXTENSION
RESEARCH DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT: 49:2562

Photograph 5:Typical view of soil sample recovered from boring

APPENDIX B

0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SS-1
CL
CL/SC
SC/CL
Red clay
Red orange sandy clay
Tan clayey sand
Tan and grey clayey sand
Bottom of the borehole
PROJECT:I-85 North Bridge MONITORING WELL NO.SS-1
CLIENT:HDR Engineering Inc. of the Carolinas PROJECT NO.49-2562
LOCATION:
Charlotte
ELEVATION:
DRILLER:
3-D Environmental
DATE DRILLED:
8/24/16
LOGGED BY:
MV
DRILL RIG:
Geoprobe
DEPTH TO WATER:
30.8
Elevation/
Depth (Ft)PIDReadingSampleNumberSampleRecovery(in/in)Graphic LogSoilClassificationSOIL DESCRIPTION WELL
CONSTRUCTION
This information pertains only to this boring and should not be in terpreted as being indicative of the site.
Figure Page 1 of 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SS-2
CL/SC
SC/CL
Red sandy clay
Red to tan sandy clay
Tan clayey sand
Tan and grey clayey sand
Bottom of the borehole
PROJECT:I-85 North Bridge MONITORING WELL NO.SS-2
CLIENT:HDR Engineering Inc. of the Carolinas PROJECT NO.49-2562
LOCATION:
Charlotte
ELEVATION:
DRILLER:
3-D Environmental
DATE DRILLED:
8/24/16
LOGGED BY:
MV
DRILL RIG:
Geoprobe
DEPTH TO WATER:
20.15
Elevation/
Depth (Ft)PIDReadingSampleNumberSampleRecovery(in/in)Graphic LogSoilClassificationSOIL DESCRIPTION WELL
CONSTRUCTION
This information pertains only to this boring and should not be in terpreted as being indicative of the site.
Figure Page 1 of 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SS-3
CL/SC
SC/CL
Red brown sandy clay
Orange and grey sandy clay
Orange adn grey clayey sand
Bottom of the borehole
PROJECT:I-85 North Bridge MONITORING WELL NO.SS-3
CLIENT:HDR Engineering Inc. of the Carolinas PROJECT NO.49-2562
LOCATION:
Charlotte
ELEVATION:
DRILLER:
3-D Environmental
DATE DRILLED:
8/24/16
LOGGED BY:
MV
DRILL RIG:
Geoprobe
DEPTH TO WATER:
18.3
Elevation/
Depth (Ft)PIDReadingSampleNumberSampleRecovery(in/in)Graphic LogSoilClassificationSOIL DESCRIPTION WELL
CONSTRUCTION
This information pertains only to this boring and should not be in terpreted as being indicative of the site.
Figure Page 1 of 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0.0
0.0
0.0
SS-4
CL/SC
SC/CL
Red brown sandy clay
Tan and grey clayey sand
Bottom of the borhole
PROJECT:I-85 North Bridge MONITORING WELL NO.SS-4
CLIENT:HDR Engineering Inc. of the Carolinas PROJECT NO.49-2562
LOCATION:
Charlotte
ELEVATION:
DRILLER:
3-D Environmental
DATE DRILLED:
8/24/16
LOGGED BY:
MV
DRILL RIG:
Geoprobe
DEPTH TO WATER:
6
Elevation/
Depth (Ft)PIDReadingSampleNumberSampleRecovery(in/in)Graphic LogSoilClassificationSOIL DESCRIPTION WELL
CONSTRUCTION
This information pertains only to this boring and should not be in terpreted as being indicative of the site.
Figure Page 1 of 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0.0
0.0
0.0
SS-5
CL/SC
SC/CL
Red brown sandy clay
Red brown to tan sandy clay
Tan and orange clayey sand
Bottom of the borehole
PROJECT:I-85 North Bridge MONITORING WELL NO.SS-5
CLIENT:HDR Engineering Inc. of the Carolinas PROJECT NO.49-2562
LOCATION:
Charlotte
ELEVATION:
DRILLER:
3-D Environmental
DATE DRILLED:
8/25/16
LOGGED BY:
MV
DRILL RIG:
Geoprobe
DEPTH TO WATER:
5.8
Elevation/
Depth (Ft)PIDReadingSampleNumberSampleRecovery(in/in)Graphic LogSoilClassificationSOIL DESCRIPTION WELL
CONSTRUCTION
This information pertains only to this boring and should not be in terpreted as being indicative of the site.
Figure Page 1 of 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0.0
0.0
0.0
SS-6
CL/SC
Red brown sandy clay
Red brown to tan grey sandy clay
Tan orange sandy clay
Bottom of the borehole
PROJECT:I-85 North Bridge MONITORING WELL NO.SS-6
CLIENT:HDR Engineering Inc. of the Carolinas PROJECT NO.49-2562
LOCATION:
Charlotte
ELEVATION:
DRILLER:
3-D Environmental
DATE DRILLED:
8/25/16
LOGGED BY:
MV
DRILL RIG:
Geoprobe
DEPTH TO WATER:
11.7
Elevation/
Depth (Ft)PIDReadingSampleNumberSampleRecovery(in/in)Graphic LogSoilClassificationSOIL DESCRIPTION WELL
CONSTRUCTION
This information pertains only to this boring and should not be in terpreted as being indicative of the site.
Figure Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX C

Page 1 of 109
Page 2 of 109
Page 3 of 109
Page 4 of 109
Page 5 of 109
Page 6 of 109
Page 7 of 109
Page 8 of 109
Page 9 of 109
Page 10 of 109
Page 11 of 109
Page 12 of 109
Page 13 of 109
Page 14 of 109
Page 15 of 109
Page 16 of 109
Page 17 of 109
Page 18 of 109
Page 19 of 109
Page 20 of 109
Page 21 of 109
Page 22 of 109
Page 23 of 109
Page 24 of 109
Page 25 of 109
Page 26 of 109
Page 27 of 109
Page 28 of 109
Page 29 of 109
Page 30 of 109
Page 31 of 109
Page 32 of 109
Page 33 of 109
Page 34 of 109
Page 35 of 109
Page 36 of 109
Page 37 of 109
Page 38 of 109
Page 39 of 109
Page 40 of 109
Page 41 of 109
Page 42 of 109
Page 43 of 109
Page 44 of 109
Page 45 of 109
Page 46 of 109
Page 47 of 109
Page 48 of 109
Page 49 of 109
Page 50 of 109
Page 51 of 109
Page 52 of 109
Page 53 of 109
Page 54 of 109
Page 55 of 109
Page 56 of 109
Page 57 of 109
Page 58 of 109
Page 59 of 109
Page 60 of 109
Page 61 of 109
Page 62 of 109
Page 63 of 109
Page 64 of 109
Page 65 of 109
Page 66 of 109
Page 67 of 109
Page 68 of 109
Page 69 of 109
Page 70 of 109
Page 71 of 109
Page 72 of 109
Page 73 of 109
Page 74 of 109
Page 75 of 109
Page 76 of 109
Page 77 of 109
Page 78 of 109
Page 79 of 109
Page 80 of 109
Page 81 of 109
Page 82 of 109
Page 83 of 109
Page 84 of 109
Page 85 of 109
Page 86 of 109
Page 87 of 109
Page 88 of 109
Page 89 of 109
Page 90 of 109
Page 91 of 109
Page 92 of 109
Page 93 of 109
Page 94 of 109
Page 95 of 109
Page 96 of 109
Page 97 of 109
Page 98 of 109
Page 99 of 109
Page 100 of 109
Page 101 of 109
Page 102 of 109
Page 103 of 109
Page 104 of 109
Page 105 of 109
Page 106 of 109
Page 107 of 109
Page 108 of 109
Page 109 of 109