22042 Matheson Ave II Work Plan- Approval 20180828

August 28, 2018

Sent Via E-mail
Kathleen Roush, PG APEX
10610 Metromont Pkwy, Suite 206
Charlotte, NC 28269
[e-mail]
Subject: Work Plan Approval
Matheson Ave II
2710 Chick Godley Rd. Charlotte, Mecklenburg County Brownfields Project No. 22042-18-060

Dear Mrs. Roush,
On August 28, 2018, the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Brownfields Program received the Work Plan for Soil Gas Sampling dated August 2018 (Work Plan) for the above
referenced Brownfields Property. DEQ Brownfields reviewed this document and determined that
comments made by DEQ Brownfields to previous versions of this work plan have been
incorporated as requested. Therefore, DEQ Brownfields approves the Work Plan. Please be advised that this approval from DEQ Brownfields does not waive any applicable
requirement to obtain any necessary permits, licenses or certifications which may be required from
other state or local entities. If you have questions about this correspondence or require additional
information, please feel free to contact me by phone at 704/661-0330 or by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Carolyn Minnich
Carolyn Minnich Brownfields Project Manager
ec: Jordan Thompson, DEQ
Gerald L. Pouncey Jr. [e-mail]
Dan Fitzpatrick [e-mail]
Work Plan for Soil Gas Sampling – Revision 01 August 27, 2018 Matheson Avenue II – BF No. 22042-18-060 Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK .......................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Current Site Conditions ........................................................................................ 2 2.2 Soil Gas Assessment ........................................................................................... 3
2.3 Receptor Survey .................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Reporting ............................................................................................................. 4
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL MEASURES ................................. 4
4.0 SCHEDULE..................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES
Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Plan with Previous Sample Locations Figure 3 Proposed Soil Gas Sampling Locations

Work Plan for Soil Gas Sampling – Revision 01 August 27, 2018 Matheson Avenue II – BF No. 22042-18-060 Page 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION
The subject site consists of two parcels of land (Site), located southeast of Matheson Avenue and Chick Godley Road (Figure 1). The Site comprises approximately 14.44-acres of land and is bound by the Southern Railway to the south, the Norfolk Southern AT&O Railway to the east, and Little Sugar Creek to the north. The western portion of the Site is bound by the North Carolina Railroad and Norfolk Southern Railway to the south, Matheson Avenue to the west, and Chick Godley Road and Little Sugar Creek to the north. The generally west-flowing Little Sugar Creek
bisects the western portion of the Site into northern and southern sections. The Site is currently vacant and being evaluated for potential development for residential use. The Site has been entered into the Brownfields Program of the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ), Division of Waste Management, Brownfields Section. In an August 8, 2018 meeting, NCDEQ requested additional assessment activities be conducted to assist in making risk management decisions for occupancy of the Site as outlined below.
Previous investigations have been performed at the Site, which include a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (2014 Phase I) and a Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (2014
Phase II) performed by Hart & Hickman (H&H) in November and December 2014, respectively, and a Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (2017 Phase II) performed by Apex Companies, LLC (Apex; dba Apex Engineering, PC) in November 2017. The 2014 Phase I indicated that approximately 50 percent of the Site is covered with fill material of unknown origin and identified a nearby business, Detrex, as a facility located topographically cross-gradient to the Site that stores and sells solvents and has the potential to have negatively impacted the Site. As part of investigations conducted by others relating to the Detrex facility, two temporary
groundwater monitoring wells (TMW-9 and TMW-10) and two permanent groundwater monitoring wells (PMW-14A and PMW-14B) have been installed in the eastern portion of the Site. MW-14A is a shallow well, screened from 20 to 30 feet below ground surface (bgs), and MW-14B is a deep well, screened from 45 to 50 feet bgs. According to the summary provided by H&H in the 2014 Phase I, the following was identified:
• Groundwater: Trichloroethene (TCE) was identified in TMW-10 at a concentration of 1.1 micrograms per liter (µg/l); barium at 121 µg/l and chromium at 9.9 µg/l were identified in
MW-14A; and chromium at 16 µg/l and chloroform at 1.2 µg/l were identified in the sample collected from MW-14B.
• Surface Water: SW-1, collected from Sugar Creek in the eastern end of the Site, contained TCE at a concentration of 91 µg/l, tetrachloroethylene (PCE) at a concentration
of 17.2 µg/l, and vinyl chloride at a concentration of 4.5 µg/l. An upstream sample collected offsite, SW-2, contained PCE at 16.9 µg/l, TCE at 88.3 µg/l, and vinyl chloride at 128 µg/l.

• Little Sugar Creek Sediment: A sediment sample collected onsite was identified with cis-1,2-dichloroethene, barium, chromium, lead, and mercury, while an upstream (offsite) sample contained vinyl chloride, arsenic, acetone, toluene, TCE, cis-1,2-dichloroethene, p-isopropyltoluene, barium, chromium, lead, and mercury. Of these compounds, vinyl
chloride and arsenic were reportedly above applicable screening criteria. Based on the potential impacts of the onsite fill material of unknown composition or origin, the 2014 Phase II was conducted, which consisted of six soil borings installed in various sections of
Work Plan for Soil Gas Sampling – Revision 01 August 27, 2018 Matheson Avenue II – BF No. 22042-18-060 Page 2

the identified fill material at depths ranging from six inches to four feet bgs and soil samples were collected for laboratory analyses. The results of the 2014 Phase II identified lead in one of the
soil samples above applicable NCDEQ, Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs).
Based on the identified impacts from the nearby Detrex facility and the limited scope of the 2014 Phase II, including shallow refusal encountered in several soil borings, Apex conducted the 2017 Phase II, which included soil, groundwater, and surface water assessment activities. The results of the 2017 Phase II suggest that the Site has been impacted by petroleum products, chlorinated solvents, and metals. Arsenic levels were identified in soil above applicable screening levels at all of the sampling locations. Benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, and benzo(b)fluoranthene were identified in soil above applicable screening levels at TP-2 and in the vicinity of the abandoned drums. PCE was identified in soil above applicable screening levels at SB-3 as well as in the vicinity of the abandoned drums. Groundwater data indicated shallow groundwater at the Site generally flows toward, and perpendicular to, Little Sugar Creek. Minor impacts from petroleum-related compounds (all below applicable standards) were noted in groundwater
throughout the Site. Only two compounds were detected above applicable standards, chromium in groundwater from TP/SB-6 and bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate in groundwater from TP/SB-2. The groundwater sample from TP/SB-6 had a high turbidity and the chromium detection was
presumed to be accounted for by the nature of the sampling from temporary wells. The bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was detected in several samples as well as laboratory method blanks; as such, these detections were presumed to be laboratory artifacts. The surface water data suggest
impacts from chlorinated solvents, specifically PCE and its breakdown products, which is generally consistent with data from the 2014 Phase II, likely attributed to the known impacts at the offsite Detrex facility. Concentrations of PCE, TCE, and vinyl chloride were highest at the upstream sampling location. Impacts from potential petroleum related SVOCs were seen in one sample, SW-2, immediately downstream of a surficial oil release observed on the adjacent Queen City Metal Recycling property. Based on the results of the previous investigations at the Site, the Site has been entered into the Brownfields Program of the NCDEQ, Division of Waste Management, Brownfields Section. In an August 8, 2018 meeting, NCDEQ requested additional assessment activities be conducted to assist in making risk management decisions for occupancy of the Site as outlined below. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
The proposed work tasks outlined below were designed to verify that possible soil and groundwater impacts have not created a vapor intrusion concern within the areas where
residential development is proposed. 2.1 Current Site Conditions
The Site is a vacant lot. The southern and eastern portions of the Site are currently landlocked between Little Sugar Creek, railroad tracks, and steep slopes up to Matheson Avenue to the west. The northern portion of the Site is located south of Chick Godley Road and north of Little Sugar Creek. Four four-story multi-family residential buildings, asphalt-paved parking areas, concrete-paved walkways, and associated amenities are proposed to be developed on the Site. Based on the results of previous site investigation activities conducted in 2014 and 2017, the NCDEQ requested additional soil gas assessment activities within the footprints of the four residential
Work Plan for Soil Gas Sampling – Revision 01 August 27, 2018 Matheson Avenue II – BF No. 22042-18-060 Page 3

buildings to be developed. Figure 2 provides the locations of previous sampling locations and the location of proposed developments.
2.2 Soil Gas Assessment
To identify if a vapor intrusion concern exists at the Site, Apex will collect eight soil gas samples, comprised of two samples from within the footprints of each of the four proposed residential buildings at the Site (Building 1 through Building 4). The proposed sample locations are shown
on Figure 3.
Soil gas sampling will be performed in accordance with procedures outlined in the June 2015 USEPA OSWER Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigating the Vapor Intrusion Pathway from
Subsurface Vapor Sources to Indoor Air and in the March 2018 NCDEQ DWM Vapor Intrusion Guidance, Version 2. Apex will advance eight temporary soil gas sampling points. Each of the soil gas sampling points will be advanced to a depth of approximately six feet bgs utilizing hand
augering techniques. Following boring completion, an approximately six-inch long stainless-steel soil gas sampling screen will be installed at the final depth of six feet bgs and connected to Teflon sample tubing, backfilled with sand between five and six feet bgs to create an approximately one-
foot screened zone, and the remainder of the annulus will be backfilled with hydrated bentonite to seal the soil gas sampling point from the surface. Representative soil gas samples will be collected from each of the newly-installed soil gas sampling points.
Prior to sample collection, each sampling point will be connected to a one-liter Summa canister and purging equipment with a series of inert tubing, valves and fittings to create an airtight sampling train. A stopcock will be installed where the Teflon tubing emerges from the ground surface. The stopcock and summa valves will be closed and a shut-in test will be performed by applying a vacuum of 25-inches of mercury to the sampling train and monitored for a minimum of
five minutes to verify that the pressure in the sampling train does not change significantly and there are no leaks in the sampling train. Following shut-in testing, each soil gas sampling assembly and sampling train will be purged a minimum of three tubing and sample train volumes with a low flow air pump or syringe to remove any ambient air introduced to the sampling train. To prevent ambient air intrusion, an air flow rate less than 200 milliliters per minute will be maintained during purging and sampling. During purging activities, a shroud will be placed over
the sample train and sample canister. The shroud will be enriched with helium and purged air from the sample train will be collected in a Tedlar bag and monitored for the presence of helium, to ensure that the sample train and soil gas sampling point is properly sealed off and that ambient air is not entering the sample. A leak is considered to occur when the helium concentration is greater than 5% of the concentration within the shroud. Helium concentrations within the shroud will also be monitored to ensure that concentration of helium within the shroud enclosure remains above 10%.
After purging, shut-in testing, and leak testing, representative samples of soil gas will be collected from each sampling point over a five-minute period using laboratory supplied one-Liter batch-certified Summa canisters equipped with a properly regulated flow controller and fittings. The time and initial pressure of the summa canister will be recorded for each sample collected. Actual
collection durations may vary during sampling due to variations within the soil matrices from which each sample is collected. The canister vacuum will be allowed to drop from an initial vacuum of 25 to 30 inches mercury to between 5 to 7 inches mercury at which time the canister valve will be closed and the sample collection completion time and final canister pressure will be recorded. The canister and flow controller identification numbers will also be recorded for each sample location.
Work Plan for Soil Gas Sampling – Revision 01 August 27, 2018 Matheson Avenue II – BF No. 22042-18-060 Page 4

The samples will be submitted to a North Carolina-certified environmental laboratory for analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method TO-15. Three samples will also be
analyzed for the presence of methane by EPA Method TO-3C. Detected VOC concentrations will be compared to the NCDEQ Residential Soil Gas Screening Levels. All sample analysis will be performed on a three-business day turnaround basis by a National Environmental Laboratory
Accreditation Conference (NELAC) certified laboratory. The laboratory will report receiving pressure of canisters and any detections of VOCs that are less than their reporting limits but at or above method detection limits (J flags). The laboratory will include a Level II Quality Assurance and Quality Control data package within the final laboratory report. As a quality control standard, duplicate samples have been included within this proposal to verify the laboratory results. 2.3 Receptor Survey In accordance with Brownfields Section requirements, a receptor survey will be performed which documents sensitive receptors within a radius of up to 0.5 miles from the Site. Although not
specifically mentioned in the meeting of August 8, 2018, we understand the survey will be a necessary element for the preparation of the Brownfields Agreement. The survey will follow Brownfields Section guidance and will include water supply wells, surface water bodies, schools,
day care centers, etc. 2.4 Reporting Upon receipt of the analytical data, Apex will prepare a report detailing field activities, sample collection methods, receptor survey results, analytical results, and recommendations for additional investigation or mitigation, if necessary. As part of the soil gas data evaluation, Apex will analyze the cumulative risk of the soil gas results using the NCDEQ Risk Calculator, February 2018 Version, the results of which will be presented in the final report, along with a discussion of the findings. The document will be submitted to NCDEQ. 3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL MEASURES
In order to verify the precision of laboratory analytical techniques, Apex will collect a blind duplicate soil gas sample to be analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method TO-15 and methane by EPA
Method TO-3C. A total of nine soil gas vapor samples will therefore be collected during the sampling.
The following quality assurance and quality control measures will be utilized during the air sampling event. Teflon tubing will be utilized at the location, and tubing will not be reused. Field personnel will don gloves when collecting samples and/or handling sample tubing or fittings and flow controllers. At each sample location, a summa canister will be used to collect the air sample. The fittings and flow controllers used to fill the canister will be dedicated to that sample and will not be reused between samples. The laboratory will supply the batch-certified summa canisters and fittings. This equipment will be decontaminated by the laboratory prior to use at the Site. To confirm that leakage to the summa canister did not occur during transport, the vacuum present in the summa canister will be recorded in the field once the sample has been collected. The vacuum in the canister will be measured again by the laboratory upon receipt. The summa
Work Plan for Soil Gas Sampling – Revision 01 August 27, 2018 Matheson Avenue II – BF No. 22042-18-060 Page 5

canister will not be filled to capacity in the field so that a minimal amount of vacuum remains. This will keep the COCs from precipitating onto the interior canister walls. 4.0 SCHEDULE
Apex will begin work on the project immediately following receipt of written authorization to proceed.

FIGURES

USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3D Elevation Program,Geographic Names Information System, National Hydrography Dataset,National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, and NationalTransportation Dataset; U.S. Census Bureau - TIGER/Line
CHECK BY: EW
DRAWN BY: SP
DATE: 11/30/17
SCALE: AS SHOWN
CAD NO.: 510551-001
PRJ NO.: 510551-001
FIGURE
SITE LOCATION MAP
CHICK GODLEY ROAD PROPERTY2710 CHICK GODLEY ROADCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
1
SITE LOCATION
JB
JB
FFE 705
FFE 694
FFE 705
FFE 705
FFE 705
FFE 694
FFE 694
FFE 694
SS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSS SS
SSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSS SS SS
SSSS8-FW
8-FW
8-FW
2-FWRPPARPPA 2-FW2-FW8-FW
8-FW
RPPA
R5.0'
R13.0'
R18.0'
R10.0'
R4.2'
R3.8'
R20.0'
R20.0'
R30.0'
R30.0'
R42.0'
R15.0'
R3.8'
R10.0'R5.0'
R18.0'
R13.1'
R20.0'
R20.0'
2 STORY LEASING/AMENITY
POOL AREA
STUB TO FUTURE
CULLMAN AVENUE
CONNECTION
TRAIL AT-GRADE
6
4
6
9
7
7
8
8
9
9
8
10
13
7
9
6
5
10 9
7
12
9
9
10
10
8
1010
10
10
8
2
11
18
8
10
12
7
9
3
LO
D
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
L
O
D
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD7
R4.5'
R4.0'
9
SW-1
SW-2
SW-3
SW-4
TP/SB-1
TP/SB-5 TP/SB-3
TP/SB-6
TP/SB-4
TP/SB-2
SOIL-1
SOIL-2
SOIL-4
SOIL-6
SOIL-5
SOIL-3
SOIL-1-112117
MW-14A/
MW-14B
XX FT BUILDING SETBACK LINE
XX FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER LINE
HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PROPERTY LINE
STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE SIDEWALK
SITE NOTES:
ZONING: TOD-M(CD)
BUILDING HEIGHT: 4 STORIES WITH BASEMENT
SITE AREA: 14.44 ACRES
ROW DEDICATION: XXXX ACRES
ADJUSTED SITE AREA:XXXX ACRES
OPEN SPACE:XXXX ACRES (XXX%)
GREEN SPACE AREA:XXXX ACRES (XXX%)
BUILDING SETBACK: FRONT YARD (XXXXXXXX): XX FT
SIDE YARD (XXXXXXXX): 5 FT
REAR YARD (XXXXXXXX): 20 FT
LANDSCAPE SETBACK: XX FT
1.THE PROPOSED BUILDING INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS
FROM AN ELECTRONIC FILE PROVIDED BY DAVIS ARCHITECTS
DATED ARCH DATE AND IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY.
CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR
EXACT BUILDING INFORMATION.
2.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3.SIDEWALK INSTALLED AGAINST BACK OF CURB SHALL BE
INSTALLED PER THE PLAN AS MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF
CURB.
4.ALL SIGNAGE AND STRIPING MUST MEET THE LATEST
REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH BY MUTCD, GDOT, AND GEORGIA
STATE CODE.
5.REFERENCE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ALL HARDSCAPE AND
LANDSCAPE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
SITE PLAN LEGEND:
PARKING SUMMARY:
PROPOSED USE:239 HOUSING UNITS (XXX SF)
REQUIRED PARKING:239 UNITS (1.5 SPACE / UNIT *239)
359 SPACES TOTAL
PARKING PROVIDED:346 SPACES
ADA SPACES REQUIRED:Value SPACES
ADA SPACES PROVIDED:Value SPACES
LOADING SPACES REQUIRED: Value SPACES
LOADING SPACES PROVIDED: Value SPACES
BICYCLE SPACES REQUIRED: Value SPACES
BICYCLE SPACES PROVIDED: Value SPACES
PARKING COUNTNORTH
7
BUILDING 1
BUILDING 2
BUILDING 3
BUILDING 4
BASE DRAWING PROVIDED BY KIMLEY HORN, NODA SUGAR CREEK SITE PLAN, DATED 5/21/2018.
SAMPLING LEGEND:
2017 INVESTIGATION:
SURFACE WATER SAMPLE LOCATION
SAMPLE LOCATION
2014 INVESTIGATION:
SOIL BORING
MONITORING WELL
JB
JB
FFE 705
FFE 694
FFE 705
FFE 705
FFE 705
FFE 694
FFE 694
FFE 694
SS
SSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSS SS
SSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSS SS SS
SSSS8-FW
8-FW
8-FW
2-FWRPPARPPA 2-FW2-FW8-FW
8-FW
RPPA
R5.0'
R13.0'
R18.0'
R10.0'
R4.2'
R3.8'
R20.0'
R20.0'
R30.0'
R30.0'
R42.0'
R15.0'
R3.8'
R10.0'R5.0'
R18.0'
R13.1'
R20.0'
R20.0'
2 STORY LEASING/AMENITY
POOL AREA
STUB TO FUTURE
CULLMAN AVENUE
CONNECTION
TRAIL AT-GRADE
6
4
6
9
7
7
8
8
9
9
8
10
13
7
9
6
5
10 9
7
12
9
9
10
10
8
1010
10
10
8
2
11
18
8
10
12
7
9
3
LO
D
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LODLODLOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LO
D
LO
D
LO
D
L
O
D
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LOD LODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLODLOD7
R4.5'
R4.0'
9
SW-1
SW-2
SW-3
SW-4
TP/SB-1
TP/SB-5 TP/SB-3
TP/SB-6
TP/SB-4
TP/SB-2
SOIL-1
SOIL-2
SOIL-4
SOIL-6
SOIL-5
SOIL-3
SOIL-1-112117
MW-14A/
MW-14B
XX FT BUILDING SETBACK LINE
XX FT LANDSCAPE BUFFER LINE
HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PROPERTY LINE
STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE SIDEWALK
SITE NOTES:
ZONING: TOD-M(CD)
BUILDING HEIGHT: 4 STORIES WITH BASEMENT
SITE AREA: 14.44 ACRES
ROW DEDICATION: XXXX ACRES
ADJUSTED SITE AREA:XXXX ACRES
OPEN SPACE:XXXX ACRES (XXX%)
GREEN SPACE AREA:XXXX ACRES (XXX%)
BUILDING SETBACK: FRONT YARD (XXXXXXXX): XX FT
SIDE YARD (XXXXXXXX): 5 FT
REAR YARD (XXXXXXXX): 20 FT
LANDSCAPE SETBACK: XX FT
1.THE PROPOSED BUILDING INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS
FROM AN ELECTRONIC FILE PROVIDED BY DAVIS ARCHITECTS
DATED ARCH DATE AND IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY.
CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR
EXACT BUILDING INFORMATION.
2.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF CURB
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3.SIDEWALK INSTALLED AGAINST BACK OF CURB SHALL BE
INSTALLED PER THE PLAN AS MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF
CURB.
4.ALL SIGNAGE AND STRIPING MUST MEET THE LATEST
REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH BY MUTCD, GDOT, AND GEORGIA
STATE CODE.
5.REFERENCE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ALL HARDSCAPE AND
LANDSCAPE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
SITE PLAN LEGEND:
PARKING SUMMARY:
PROPOSED USE:239 HOUSING UNITS (XXX SF)
REQUIRED PARKING:239 UNITS (1.5 SPACE / UNIT *239)
359 SPACES TOTAL
PARKING PROVIDED:346 SPACES
ADA SPACES REQUIRED:Value SPACES
ADA SPACES PROVIDED:Value SPACES
LOADING SPACES REQUIRED: Value SPACES
LOADING SPACES PROVIDED: Value SPACES
BICYCLE SPACES REQUIRED: Value SPACES
BICYCLE SPACES PROVIDED: Value SPACES
PARKING COUNTNORTH
7
SAMPLING LEGEND:
2017 INVESTIGATION:
SURFACE WATER SAMPLE LOCATION
SAMPLE LOCATION
2014 INVESTIGATION:
SOIL BORING
MONITORING WELL
PROPOSED SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
BUILDING 1
BUILDING 2
BUILDING 3
BUILDING 4
BASE DRAWING PROVIDED BY KIMLEY HORN, NODA SUGAR CREEK SITE PLAN, DATED 5/21/2018.