10010 Dixie Trucking VIMS WP-Approval 20120521

1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Phone: [phone] \ Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer – 50% Recycled \ 10% Post Consumer Paper

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources

Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Dee Freeman
Secretary

May 21, 2012

Sent Via E-mail

Mr. Steve Hart
Hart & Hickman, PC
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
[e-mail]

Subject: Approval Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Work Plan
Former Dixie Trucking, 3606 North Graham Street
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County
Brownfields Project Number 10010-06-60

Dear Mr. Hart:
On May 2, 2012,the North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
(DENR) Brownfields Program received an electronic submittal for the Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Work
Plan dated April 27, 2012 for the above referenced property. Additional information was submitted on
May 18, 2012 containing details of the proposed mitigation plan. This work plan was submitted in
accordance with the Notice of Brownfields Property (NBP) Land Use recorded on February 22, 2008.
The work plan is approved as noted, in the final report the Professional Engineer must provide
certification of proper installation. This tracks the language NBP.

Be advised that this approval from the Brownfields Program does not waive any applicable
requirement to obtain any necessary permits, licenses or certifications for the above listed activities nor
does it waive any requirement to comply with applicable law for such activities. If you have questions
about this correspondence or require additional information, please contact me by phone at
704/661-0330, or by e-mail at [e-mail].

Sincerely,
Carolyn Minnich
Carolyn Minnich
Brownfields Project Manager
Division of Waste Management

ec: Bruce Nicholson, DENR
Will Service, DENR
DENR Project File

Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Work Plan
M.H.O.C., LLC Brownfields Agreement
Former Dixie Trucking Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 10010-06-60

H&H Job No. PTT-001
April 27, 2012

2923 South Tryon Street
Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
704-586-0007

3334 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-847-4241

#C-1269 Engineering
#C-245 Geology
i

S:\AAA-Master Projects\Premier Transportation - PTT\PTT-001 Dixie Trucking Site\Mitigation WP\Premier WP.doc
Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Work Plan
M.H.O.C., LLC Brownfields Agreement
Former Dixie Trucking Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina H&H Job No. PTT-001

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Page No.

1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................1
2.0 Assessment Activities ..............................................................................................................3
2.1 Soil Vapor Sampling .............................................................................................................3
2.1.1 Soil Vapor Sampling Methods .......................................................................................3
2.1.2 Soil Vapor Sample Results ............................................................................................5
2.2 Indoor Air Sampling .............................................................................................................5
2.2.1 Indoor Air Sampling Methods .......................................................................................5
2.2.2 Indoor Air Sample Results .............................................................................................6
2.3 Upgradient Ground Water Assessment .................................................................................7
2.3.1 Monitor Well Installation and Sampling Methods .........................................................7
2.3.2 Ground Water Sample Results .......................................................................................8
3.0 Vapor Mitigation Plan ............................................................................................................9
3.1 Mitigation System Installation ..............................................................................................9
3.2 Confirmation Sampling Plan ..............................................................................................11
4.0 Reporting ...............................................................................................................................12

ii

S:\AAA-Master Projects\Premier Transportation - PTT\PTT-001 Dixie Trucking Site\Mitigation WP\Premier WP.doc
List of Tables

Table 1 Ambient Air Monitoring Data
Table 2 Summary of Subslab Soil Vapor Sample Results

List of Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Vapor Assessment Sample Map
Figure 4 Vapor Mitigation System Layout

List of Appendices

Appendix A Soil Vapor Laboratory Analytical Report
Appendix B Indoor Air Laboratory Analytical Report
Appendix C Monitor Well Construction Records
Appendix D Ground Water Laboratory Analytical Report

1
Hart & Hickman, PC
s:\aaa-master projects\premier transportation - ptt\ptt-001 dixie trucking site\mitigation wp\premier wp.doc
Vapor Mitigation Work Plan M.H.O.C., LLC Brownfields Agreement
Former Dixie Trucking Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTT-001

1.0 Introduction

On behalf of M.H.O.C., LLC, Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is submitting this Vapor Intrusion
Mitigation Workplan for the former Dixie Trucking facility (currently Premier Transportation)
located at 3606 N. Graham Street in Charlotte, North Carolina. A site location map is included
as Figure 1, and site map is included as Figure 2.

In 2011, Premier Transportation (Premier) decided to enclose a portion of the site loading dock.
It eventually elected to enclose the eastern portion of the loading dock and, in accordance with
the Brownfields Agreement (BFA) for the site and a work plan approved by the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Brownfields Section, H&H
conducted sub-slab soil vapor sampling beneath that portion of the loading dock. Sub-slab soil
vapor samples VMP-1 through VMP-3 were collected from below the eastern end of the loading
dock in July 2011 (Figure 3). Results of the sampling did not indicate any compound
concentrations above DENR Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) industrial/commercial soil
gas screening concentrations (SGSCs). The July 2011 soil vapor assessment activities and
results were presented in a soil vapor sampling report dated August 26, 2011 which was
submitted to DENR. Upon DENR concurrence, the eastern portion of the loading dock was
subsequently enclosed.

Premier now proposes to enclose the western portion of the loading dock. Accordingly, to
comply with the BFA for the site, H&H is submitting this vapor intrusion mitigation work plan
for that portion of the dock.

2
Hart & Hickman, PC
s:\aaa-master projects\premier transportation - ptt\ptt-001 dixie trucking site\mitigation wp\premier wp.doc
Data exist concerning sub-slab conditions under the western portion of the dock. Before
deciding to enclose the eastern portion of the dock, Premier had considered enclosing the western
portion. It eventually abandoned that plan for business reasons. Before doing so, in May 2011,
Premier asked H&H to collect three sub-slab soil vapor samples beneath the western end of the
dock. The results of the soil vapor analyses indicated the presence of tetrachloroethene (PCE)
above DENR (IHSB) industrial/commercial SGSCs in all three samples. No other compounds
were detected above the screening levels. The May 2011 soil vapor assessment activities and
sample results are discussed in Section 2.1.

The western end of the loading dock where elevated levels of PCE were detected in sub-slab soil
vapor samples in May 2011 is located adjacent to the site office building. Therefore, to assess
for the potential for vapor intrusion into the office space from nearby soil vapor, Premier
requested that H&H collect indoor air samples within the office space in August 2011. The
indoor air assessment activities and sample results are discussed in Section 2.2.

The source of the elevated levels of PCE in soil vapor below the western loading dock is not
known. PCE has been detected in ground water in low levels near the eastern portion of the
loading dock, but no monitor wells were located near the western end of the loading dock. To
evaluate if the source of the PCE could be upgradient, two ground water monitor wells (HHMW-
2 and HHMW-3) were installed in July 2011 in the western upgradient portion of the site in the
locations shown in Figure 2. PCE was not detected in the two upgradient wells. Monitor well
installation activities and sample results are discussed in Section 2.3.

As noted, Premier would like to enclose the remaining (western) portion of the loading dock. In
accordance with the BFA, Premier is submitting this work plan for vapor intrusion mitigation
activities to be conducted as part of the western loading dock enclosure. Details concerning the
mitigation system are included in Section 3.0.

3
Hart & Hickman, PC
s:\aaa-master projects\premier transportation - ptt\ptt-001 dixie trucking site\mitigation wp\premier wp.doc
2.0 Assessment Activities

2.1 Soil Vapor Sampling

In May 2011, H&H collected three sub-slab soil vapor (SSV) samples beneath the western end of
the site loading dock to assess the potential for vapor intrusion in that area. H&H collected the
three SSV samples (identified as SSV-1 through SSV-3) beneath the loading dock that Premier
now plans to enclose. The sampling was conducted in accordance with the approved Soil Vapor
Sampling Work Plan dated April 29, 2011, and DENR’s May 5, 2011 response letter to the work
plan. The May 2011 sample locations and the area of the loading dock which is planned to be
enclosed are shown in Figure 3. The methods and results of the sub-slab soil vapor sampling are
discussed in the following sections.

2.1.1 Soil Vapor Sampling Methods

Each SSV sample point was installed by first drilling a 1.5-inch diameter boring through the
concrete slab at each SSV location. At each location, the concrete slab was observed to be
approximately six inches thick and to sit on top of approximately one inch of gravel. The gravel
layer was observed to be underlain by orange-red silty clay. To construct each SSV sample
point, a dedicated AMS stainless steel vapor sample point fitted with a length of 0.25-inch
diameter Teflon® tubing was inserted through the borehole and seated in the soil at the bottom of
the boring. Filter sand was then poured through the borehole about the vapor tip to
approximately 4 to 5 inches below the top surface of the slab. Each SSV sample point was then
completed by installing hydrated bentonite in the annular space about the sample tubing from the
top of the sand to the top surface of the concrete slab.

Following installation of each SSV sample point and prior to collection the vapor sample from
the point, a leak check of the SSV sample point was conducted. The leak check was performed
by first placing a shroud over the SSV sample point, filling the shroud helium gas, and using a

4
Hart & Hickman, PC
s:\aaa-master projects\premier transportation - ptt\ptt-001 dixie trucking site\mitigation wp\premier wp.doc
helium gas detector to verify that the shroud was saturated with helium gas. Then, the SSV
sample point was purged using a syringe and a three-way valve to collect purged vapor into a
Tedlar® bag. The purged vapor was subsequently analyzed using the helium gas detector to
ensure that helium concentrations were less than 10% of the helium concentrations in the shroud.

Following successful leak check of each SSV sample point, laboratory-supplied sample
equipment was constructed into a sample train that included a 6-liter Summa canister that was
connected to a flow regulator. The flow regulator was set to collect the sample during an 8-hour
period. The intake orifice of the flow regulator was connected directly to the SSV sample point
tubing using a ferrule to form an air-tight seal with the tubing. Following assembly of the sample
train, the Summa canister’s air intake valve was opened to begin collection of the soil vapor
sample. Following completion of the sampling, the SSV points were removed and the borings
were abandoned.

As part of the sampling effort, H&H also measured wind speed and direction outside of the
loading dock and indoor/outdoor temperatures were recorded near the start, middle, and end of
the sampling period. A light rain occurred at the beginning of the event, but stopped after the
start of the sampling. The results of the air sampling measurements of wind speed, wind
direction, and temperature are summarized in Table 1.

After sample collection, the regulator valves on the canisters were closed and the sample train
was disassembled. The Summa canisters were properly labeled, placed into laboratory-supplied
shipping containers, and shipped under standard chain-of-custody protocols to Con-Test
Analytical Laboratory in East Longmeadow, MA for analysis of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) by EPA Method TO-15.

5
Hart & Hickman, PC
s:\aaa-master projects\premier transportation - ptt\ptt-001 dixie trucking site\mitigation wp\premier wp.doc

2.1.2 Soil Vapor Sample Results

A summary of the soil vapor sample analytical results are included as Table 2. The laboratory
analytical report for the soil vapor samples is provided as Appendix A. The concentrations of
compounds detected in the soil vapor samples were compared to the DENR IHSB
Industrial/Commercial SGSCs.

As indicated in Table 2, multiple compounds were detected in the samples. With the exception
of PCE, the compounds were detected in low concentrations below SGSCs. PCE was detected in
SSV-1 (33,000 µg/m3), SSV-2 (17,000 µg/m3), and SSV-3 (1,300 µg/m3) at levels above the
industrial/commercial SGSC for PCE of 210 µg/m3, which is based upon a lifetime incremental
cancer risk (LICR) of 1 x 10-5.

2.2 Indoor Air Sampling

As discussed above, elevated levels of PCE were detected in sub-slab soil vapor beneath the
western end of the loading dock which is located adjacent to the site office building. In order to
assess for the potential for vapor intrusion into the office space from nearby soil vapor, H&H
collected indoor air samples within the office space in August 2011. The methods and results of
the indoor air sampling are discussed in detail in the following sections.

2.2.1 Indoor Air Sampling Methods

On August 13, 2011, H&H collected two indoor air samples from the main office area of the site
building. In addition, a background air sample was collected from an outdoor location that was
upwind of the office building (as determined by H&H personnel at the time of sampling). The
locations of the indoor air samples, (identifies as IAS-1 and IAS-2), and the background air
sample (identified as BAS-1) are indicated in Figure 3.

6
Hart & Hickman, PC
s:\aaa-master projects\premier transportation - ptt\ptt-001 dixie trucking site\mitigation wp\premier wp.doc

At the time of the sampling activities, the office space had recently been remodeled (including
painting, ceiling tile replacement, and floor refinishing). Remodeling activities were finished
approximately one week prior to indoor air sampling activities. The sampling activities were
conducted during the weekend when the office space was uninhabited; however, the heating
ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) system was allowed to run as it would during a normal
working day. Doors between the office space and the exterior and loading dock were kept closed
during the sampling, except when opened and closed for the purposes of access.

Each ambient air sample was collected using laboratory-supplied sample equipment constructed
into a sample train which included a 6-liter Summa canister that was connected to a flow
regulator. The flow regulator was set to collect the sample during an 8-hour period. The intake
orifice of the flow regulator was connected to a 3 ft long sampling cane used to extend the
sample intake to approximately 5 ft above grade (typical breathing zone height).

After collection of each sample was complete, the regulator valve on the canister was closed and
the sample train was disassembled. Each Summa canister was properly labeled, placed into
laboratory-supplied shipping containers, and shipped under standard chain-of-custody protocols
to Con-Test Analytical Laboratory in East Longmeadow, MA for analysis of PCE and its primary
degradation products (trichloroethene, cis-1,2-dichloroethene, trans-1,2-dichloroethene, and vinyl
chloride) by EPA Method TO-15.

2.2.2 Indoor Air Sample Results

The results of the indoor sampling indicate that, with the exception of PCE, no compounds were
detected in either of the indoor air samples or the background sample. Low levels of PCE were
detected in both indoor air samples IAS-1 (0.37 µg/m3) and IAS-2 (0.54 µg/m3), and background
air sample BAS-1 (0.14J µg/m3). The detected concentrations are below the DENR IHSB
industrial/commercial indoor air screening level of 2.1 µg/m3. The DENR screening level is

7
Hart & Hickman, PC
s:\aaa-master projects\premier transportation - ptt\ptt-001 dixie trucking site\mitigation wp\premier wp.doc
based upon very conservative assumptions and a LICR of 1 x 10-6. DENR typically only requests
indoor air mitigation at industrial/commercial facilities when the LICR exceeds 1 x 10-4. The
PCE screening level based upon a LICR of 1 x 10-4 is 210 µg/m3. The detected PCE indoor air
concentrations are several orders of magnitude less than the DENR screening level based upon a
LICR of 1 x 10-4. The laboratory analytical report for the indoor air samples is provided as
Appendix B.

2.3 Upgradient Ground Water Assessment

As mentioned in Section 1.0, the source of the elevated levels of PCE in soil vapor below the
western loading dock is not known. PCE has been detected in groundwater in low levels near the
eastern portion of the loading dock, but no monitor wells were located near the western end of
the loading dock. To evaluate if the source of the PCE could be upgradient, two ground water
monitoring wells were installed in the western upgradient portion of the site and the wells were
sampled in July 2011. The monitor wells are identified as HHMW-2 and HHMW-3 in Figure 2.
The methods and results of the monitor well installation and sampling are discussed in detail in
the following sections.

2.3.1 Monitor Well Installation and Sampling Methods

On July 22, 2011, H&H oversaw the installation of monitor wells HHMW-2 and HHMW-3 in
the western (hydraulically upgradient) portion of the site to assess the potential for migration of
compounds in ground water from an upgradient source (Figure 2).

Monitor wells HHMW-2 and HHMW-3 were installed to total depth of 25 and 30 ft bgs,
respectively, and are both constructed of 2-inch diameter PVC casing and screen. Monitor well
HHMW-2 was constructed with 15 ft of well screen and HHMW-3 was constructed with 20 ft of
well screen. After installation, each well was developed until the turbidity measured less than 50

8
Hart & Hickman, PC
s:\aaa-master projects\premier transportation - ptt\ptt-001 dixie trucking site\mitigation wp\premier wp.doc
NTU and field parameters of pH, conductivity, and temperature stabilized. Well construction
records are provided in Appendix C.

Ground water samples were collected from the newly installed monitor wells on August 13,
2011. Prior to sample collection, H&H purged the wells until field measurements of pH,
conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity stabilized, and turbidity measurements
were less than 10 NTU. Groundwater samples were then collected using low-flow sampling
methods.

After ground water parameters stabilized during purging, ground water from each monitor well
was poured directly into laboratory-supplied containers, which were then sealed, labeled, placed
into laboratory-supplied sample coolers, and covered with ice. The coolers were delivered under
standard chain-of-custody protocols to Test America of Nashville, TN to be analyzed for (VOCs)
by EPA Method 8260.

Following installation, the tops of casing of the two newly installed monitor wells were
determined using survey techniques. The tops of casing were referenced to the existing monitor
well network. H&H collected water levels from the two newly installed wells and six of the
existing site wells on August 13, 2011 to evaluate groundwater flow direction. The ground water
elevation data indicate that ground water flow is generally to the east-southeast beneath the site.

2.3.2 Ground Water Sample Results

The results of the groundwater sample analysis indicate that no VOCs were detected in either
sample. The laboratory analytical report for the ground water samples is provided as Appendix
D.

9
Hart & Hickman, PC
s:\aaa-master projects\premier transportation - ptt\ptt-001 dixie trucking site\mitigation wp\premier wp.doc
3.0 Vapor Mitigation Plan

Based upon the results of the assessment activities described in Section 2.0, vapor intrusion does
not pose a concern to indoor air quality in the office building. The detected PCE concentrations
are several orders of magnitude less than concentrations that would typically require mitigation.
As noted in Section 1.0, Premier would like to enclose the remaining (western) portion of the
loading dock where PCE was detected in sub-slab soil vapor at levels above the
industrial/commercial SGSC for PCE (as discussed in Section 2.1).

Premier plans to enclose an approximately 34,000 sq ft loading dock area that is currently open
and covered (Figure 2). The volume of the enclosed area will be approximately 850,000 cu ft
(based on a 25 ft ceiling height). The space will continue to be used as a loading dock and will
include bay doors that may be opened or closed (depending on outside air temperature) during
normal operating hours when a trailer is not docked to the bay. According to Premier, the area
will be heated with electric overhead heating units, but not cooled.

To expedite completion of the enclosure, Premier requested that H&H develop a vapor intrusion
mitigation plan in accordance with the BFA. Proposed vapor mitigation activities are presented
below.

3.1 Mitigation System Installation

The proposed vapor mitigation will be accomplished with an active sub-slab depressurization
system. This system works by applying a vacuum to the building sub-slab to reduce the pressure
below the slab and thereby minimize migration of sub-slab vapor into indoor air. Vapor captured
by the vacuum is discharged outside of the building to the atmosphere. The proposed vapor
mitigation system will include three vacuum blowers and associated piping that will each draw
vapor from a pair of sub-slab vapor extraction points. The mitigation system layout is depicted
in Figure 4.

10
Hart & Hickman, PC
s:\aaa-master projects\premier transportation - ptt\ptt-001 dixie trucking site\mitigation wp\premier wp.doc

Roof support columns are aligned along the center of the loading dock and it is likely that a
continuous foundation footer runs beneath the slab in-line with the columns. Because the
foundation footer would likely act as a barrier that divides the sub-slab area targeted for
mitigation, the extraction point pairs will be installed so that one point of each pair is located on
each side of the footer. The extraction points will each be installed near a roof support column.

Each extraction point will be constructed by installing a 4-inch diameter PVC pipe connected to a
3-inch reducer into a borehole drilled through the building’s slab. The intake orifice of the
extraction point will be set in the gravel layer beneath the slab and the penetration will be sealed
using a foam backer and silicon sealer. The pipes extending from each pair of extraction points
will be joined into a single 3-inch diameter pipe above the slab and will be run up the roof
support column, then along the roof support truss, and through the exterior wall of the enclosure.
In addition, to allow easy verification that each system is operating, a manometer will be installed
on the vertical pipe run at the column at approximately 2 to 6 ft above the floor. Finally, a
protective bollard will be installed adjacent to each extraction point.

Outside of the exterior wall of the enclosure, the pipe will be connected to a low voltage vacuum
blower motor that will be mounted on the outdoor side of the exterior wall of the enclosure. An
exhaust line will extend from the top of each vacuum blower to the edge of the structure’s roof
overhang (which extends approximately 15 ft horizontally from the dock), and will discharge
vapors at a height greater than 1 ft above the roof line. Electrical wiring will be run to each of
the suction fans within a conduit from existing power bases located in close proximity to the
vacuum blowers. Each suction fan will include a waterproof power switch protected with a
lockable cover.

11
Hart & Hickman, PC
s:\aaa-master projects\premier transportation - ptt\ptt-001 dixie trucking site\mitigation wp\premier wp.doc

3.2 Confirmation Sampling Plan

Following the mitigation system installation and enclosure of the loading dock, H&H proposes to
collect two indoor air samples from within the newly enclosed area in the approximate locations
shown in Figure 4 to verify indoor air compound concentrations (if any) are within acceptable
levels. In addition, one background air sample will be collected from an upwind location outside
of the enclosed area. H&H will conduct post-mitigation confirmation indoor air sampling a
minimum of 30 days after installation and startup of the mitigation systems and completion of the
loading dock enclosure activities. The confirmation samples will be collected using the same
methods described in Section 2.2.1. Based upon the previous sub-slab sampling data, the indoor
air samples will be analyzed for PCE and its primary degradation products (trichloroethene, cis-
1,2-dichloroethene, trans-1,2-dichloroethene, and vinyl chloride) by EPA Method TO-15.

12
Hart & Hickman, PC
s:\aaa-master projects\premier transportation - ptt\ptt-001 dixie trucking site\mitigation wp\premier wp.doc
4.0 Reporting

Following completion of the mitigation installation activities, H&H will prepare a report which
describes the methods and results of the mitigation system installation and subsequent indoor air
confirmation sampling. The report will include the methods of the system installation and
subsequent sampling, photographs taken during the installation, manometer readings from each
system, details of the final layout of the system, field measurements taken during the sampling
event, a tabular summary of the confirmation sample data, a Professional Engineer certification
of installation, and conclusions and recommendations based upon the activities.

Table 1
Ambient Air Monitoring Data
Former Dixie Trucking Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTT-001
Time Temperature
oF
8:05 65.3
12:30 75.3
16:00 80.1
Time Temperature
oF Wind Direction
Wind Speed
(mph)Precipitation
8:05 66.3 NNE <1 Light Rain
12:30 84.2 NNE <1 None
16:00 82.1 NNE <1 None
Notes:
Information from on-site weather station set up by H&H on May 11, 2011 during sampling event.
NA = Not Applicable
Temperature readings taken at SSV-2 sample location
Outdoor
Loading Dock
Sample
SSV-2
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Premier Transportation - PTT\PTT-001 Dixie Trucking Site\Mitigation WP\Table 1
3/29/2012
Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2 Summary of Subslab Soil Vapor Sample ResultsMay 2011Former Dixie Trucking SiteCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. PPT-001Sample ID Collection Date UnitsAcetoneBenzene2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon DisulfideChloroformChloromethaneCyclohexaneDichlorodifluoromethane1,2-DichloroethaneEthanolEthyl acetateEthylbenzene4-EthyltolueneHeptaneHexaneSSV-1 5/11/2011µg/m3140 0.80 15 30 0.32 <0.10 5.2 1.4 0.73 14 6.6 1.6 0.61 2.3 2.0SSV-2 5/11/2011µg/m3300 2.5 25 5.5 0.56 0.55 67 1.2 2.7 47 18 4.0 1.1 7.2 4.8SSV-3 5/11/2011µg/m3150 1.0 19 4.0 0.31 0.26 5.0 1.3 2.0 28 19 2.5 0.76 5.4 4.7µg/m3280,000 160 44,000 6,200 53 780 NE 880 47 NE NE 490 NE NE 6,200Sample ID Collection Date UnitsIsopropanolMethylene chloride4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK)StyreneTetrachloroetheneTetrahydrofuranToluene1,1,1-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneTrichlorofluoromethane1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane1,2,4-Trimethyl-benzene1,3,5-Trimethyl-benzenem,p-Xyleneo-XyleneSSV-1 5/11/2011µg/m36.2 1.5 6.1 1.333,0001.6 70 3.8 2.2 1.6 9.1 2.4 0.63 5.0 1.5SSV-2 5/11/2011µg/m312 2.6 12 2.617,0000.96 240 1.1 1.1 1.5 72 6.0 2.0 13 5.9SSV-3 5/11/2011µg/m314 3.4 9.8 2.81,3001.7 140 1.1 0.58 1.5 470 2.4 0.76 6.0 1.8µg/m3NE 2,600 NE 8,800 350 NE 44,000 44,000 17.6 6,200 260,000 62 NE 880 880Bold indicates concentration exceeds screening levelµg/m3 indicates micrograms per cubic meterNE = screening level not established1. Screening levels are from DENR Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch Industrial/Commercial Vapor Intrusion Screening Table dated February 2012Screening Level1EPA Method TO-15Notes: EPA Method TO-15Screening Level1 S:\AAA-Master Projects\Premier Transportation - PTT\PTT-001 Dixie Trucking Site\Mitigation WP\Table 23/29/2012Table 2 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PC
TITLE
PROJECT
SITE LOCATION MAP
FORMER DIXIE TRUCKING SITE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
JOB NO:
REVISION NO:
FIGURE NO:
9-12-11 0
1PTT-001
0 2000 4000
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEETN
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
DERITA, NC 1993
SITE
Appendix A
Soil Vapor Laboratory Analytical Report
Page 1 of 20
Page 2 of 20
Page 3 of 20
Page 4 of 20
Page 5 of 20
Page 6 of 20
Page 7 of 20
Page 8 of 20
Page 9 of 20
Page 10 of 20
Page 11 of 20
Page 12 of 20
Page 13 of 20
Page 14 of 20
Page 15 of 20
Page 16 of 20
Page 17 of 20
Page 18 of 20
Page 19 of 20
Page 20 of 20
Appendix B
Indoor Air Laboratory Analytical Report
Page 1 of 13
Page 2 of 13
Page 3 of 13
Page 4 of 13
Page 5 of 13
Page 6 of 13
Page 7 of 13
Page 8 of 13
Page 9 of 13
Page 10 of 13
Page 11 of 13
Page 12 of 13
Page 13 of 13
Appendix C
Monitoring Well Construction Records
Appendix D
Ground Water Laboratory Analytical Report 
ANALYTICAL REPORT
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc.
TestAmerica Nashville
2960 Foster Creighton Road
Nashville, TN 37204
Tel:[phone]
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153
Client Project/Site: PTT-001
Client Project Description: Premier Trucking
For:
Hart & Hickman (2162)
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28203-5449
Attn: Kurtis Beshers
Authorized for release by:
08/22/2011 02:02:22 PM
Ken A. Hayes
Senior Project Manager
[e-mail]
This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature
is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature.
Page 1 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Table of Contents
Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153
Page 2 of 22
TestAmerica Nashville
08/22/2011
Cover Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
Sample Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
Client Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
QC Sample Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
QC Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
Chronicle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
Method Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19
Certification Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
Chain of Custody . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Sample Summary
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID ReceivedCollectedMatrix
NUH2153-01 HHMW-2 Water 08/13/11 11:40 08/16/11 08:20
NUH2153-02 HHMW-3 Water 08/13/11 10:40 08/16/11 08:20
TestAmerica NashvillePage 3 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Definitions/Glossary
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
Glossary
These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report.
☼Listed under the "D" column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis
Abbreviation
%R Percent Recovery
DL, RA, RE, IN Indicates a Dilution, Reanalysis, Re-extraction, or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample
EDL Estimated Detection Limit (Dioxin)
EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
MDL Method Detection Limit
ML Minimum Level (Dioxin)
ND Not detected at the reporting limit (or method detection limit if shown)
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit
RL Reporting Limit
RPD Relative Percent Difference, a measure of the relative difference between two points
TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor (Dioxin)
TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient (Dioxin)
TestAmerica NashvillePage 4 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
Lab Sample ID: NUH2153-01Client Sample ID: HHMW-2
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 08/13/11 11:40
Date Received: 08/16/11 08:20
Method: SW846 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B
Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Acetone ND 50.0 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00
Analyte
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00BenzeneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00BromobenzeneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00BromochloromethaneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00BromodichloromethaneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00BromoformND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00BromomethaneND
50.0 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.002-Butanone ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00sec-Butylbenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00n-Butylbenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00tert-Butylbenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00Carbon disulfide ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00Carbon Tetrachloride ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00ChlorobenzeneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00ChlorodibromomethaneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00ChloroethaneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00ChloroformND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00ChloromethaneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.002-Chlorotoluene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.004-Chlorotoluene ND
5.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00DibromomethaneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,4-Dichlorobenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,3-Dichlorobenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,2-Dichlorobenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00DichlorodifluoromethaneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,1-Dichloroethane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,2-Dichloroethane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,1-Dichloroethene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,3-Dichloropropane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,2-Dichloropropane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.002,2-Dichloropropane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,1-Dichloropropene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00EthylbenzeneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00HexachlorobutadieneND
50.0 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.002-Hexanone ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00IsopropylbenzeneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00p-Isopropyltoluene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00Methyl tert-Butyl Ether ND
5.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00Methylene Chloride ND
10.0 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.004-Methyl-2-pentanone ND
5.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00NaphthaleneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00n-Propylbenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00StyreneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND
TestAmerica NashvillePage 5 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
Lab Sample ID: NUH2153-01Client Sample ID: HHMW-2
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 08/13/11 11:40
Date Received: 08/16/11 08:20
Method: SW846 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B (Continued)
Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00
Analyte
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00TetrachloroetheneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00TolueneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,1,2-Trichloroethane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,1,1-Trichloroethane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00TrichloroetheneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00TrichlorofluoromethaneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,2,3-Trichloropropane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00Vinyl chloride ND
3.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00Xylenes, total ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00Diisopropyl Ether ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.001,2-Dichloroethene (total)ND
Qualifier Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 104 63-140 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.00
Surrogate
Dibromofluoromethane 106 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.0073-131
Toluene-d8 96 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.0080-120
4-Bromofluorobenzene 96 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 09:42 1.0079-125
Lab Sample ID: NUH2153-02Client Sample ID: HHMW-3
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 08/13/11 10:40
Date Received: 08/16/11 08:20
Method: SW846 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B
Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
Acetone ND 50.0 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00
Analyte
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00BenzeneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00BromobenzeneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00BromochloromethaneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00BromodichloromethaneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00BromoformND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00BromomethaneND
50.0 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.002-Butanone ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00sec-Butylbenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00n-Butylbenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00tert-Butylbenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00Carbon disulfide ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00Carbon Tetrachloride ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00ChlorobenzeneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00ChlorodibromomethaneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00ChloroethaneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00ChloroformND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00ChloromethaneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.002-Chlorotoluene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.004-Chlorotoluene ND
TestAmerica NashvillePage 6 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
Lab Sample ID: NUH2153-02Client Sample ID: HHMW-3
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 08/13/11 10:40
Date Received: 08/16/11 08:20
Method: SW846 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B (Continued)
Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 5.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00
Analyte
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00DibromomethaneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,4-Dichlorobenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,3-Dichlorobenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,2-Dichlorobenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00DichlorodifluoromethaneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,1-Dichloroethane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,2-Dichloroethane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,1-Dichloroethene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,3-Dichloropropane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,2-Dichloropropane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.002,2-Dichloropropane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,1-Dichloropropene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00EthylbenzeneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00HexachlorobutadieneND
50.0 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.002-Hexanone ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00IsopropylbenzeneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00p-Isopropyltoluene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00Methyl tert-Butyl Ether ND
5.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00Methylene Chloride ND
10.0 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.004-Methyl-2-pentanone ND
5.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00NaphthaleneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00n-Propylbenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00StyreneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00TetrachloroetheneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00TolueneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,1,2-Trichloroethane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,1,1-Trichloroethane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00TrichloroetheneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00TrichlorofluoromethaneND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,2,3-Trichloropropane ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00Vinyl chloride ND
3.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00Xylenes, total ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00Diisopropyl Ether ND
1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.001,2-Dichloroethene (total)ND
Qualifier Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 105 63-140 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00
Surrogate
Dibromofluoromethane 105 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.0073-131
TestAmerica NashvillePage 7 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Client Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
Lab Sample ID: NUH2153-02Client Sample ID: HHMW-3
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 08/13/11 10:40
Date Received: 08/16/11 08:20
Method: SW846 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B (Continued)
Qualifier Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac % Recovery Limits
Toluene-d8 96 80-120 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.00
Surrogate
4-Bromofluorobenzene 99 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 10:10 1.0079-125
TestAmerica NashvillePage 8 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
Method: SW846 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: 11H3462-BLK1
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total
Analysis Batch: U014652 Prep Batch: 11H3462_P
Result Qualifier Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil FacRLMDL
Acetone ND 50.0 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00
Blank Blank
Analyte
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Benzene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Bromobenzene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Bromochloromethane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Bromodichloromethane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Bromoform
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Bromomethane
ND 50.0 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.002-Butanone
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00sec-Butylbenzene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00n-Butylbenzene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00tert-Butylbenzene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Carbon disulfide
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Carbon Tetrachloride
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Chlorobenzene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Chlorodibromomethane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Chloroethane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Chloroform
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Chloromethane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.002-Chlorotoluene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.004-Chlorotoluene
ND 5.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Dibromomethane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,2-Dichlorobenzene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,1-Dichloroethane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,2-Dichloroethane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,1-Dichloroethene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,3-Dichloropropane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,2-Dichloropropane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.002,2-Dichloropropane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,1-Dichloropropene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Ethylbenzene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Hexachlorobutadiene
ND 50.0 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.002-Hexanone
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Isopropylbenzene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00p-Isopropyltoluene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Methyl tert-Butyl Ether
ND 5.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Methylene Chloride
ND 10.0 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.004-Methyl-2-pentanone
ND 5.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Naphthalene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00n-Propylbenzene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Styrene
TestAmerica NashvillePage 9 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
Method: SW846 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Method BlankLab Sample ID: 11H3462-BLK1
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total
Analysis Batch: U014652 Prep Batch: 11H3462_P
Result Qualifier Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil FacRLMDL
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00
Blank Blank
Analyte
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Tetrachloroethene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Toluene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,1,2-Trichloroethane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,1,1-Trichloroethane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Trichloroethene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Trichlorofluoromethane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,2,3-Trichloropropane
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Vinyl chloride
ND 3.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Xylenes, total
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Diisopropyl Ether
ND 1.00 ug/L 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.001,2-Dichloroethene (total)
% Recovery Qualifier Prepared Analyzed Dil FacLimits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 102 63-140 08/17/11 08:18 1.00
Blank Blank
Surrogate
08/17/11 05:30
104 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Dibromofluoromethane73-131
97 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.00Toluene-d8 80-120
98 08/17/11 05:30 08/17/11 08:18 1.004-Bromofluorobenzene 79-125
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: 11H3462-BS1
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total
Analysis Batch: U014652 Prep Batch: 11H3462_P
Spike
Added Result Qualifier Unit % Rec
% Rec.
Limits
Acetone 250 232 ug/L 93 56 -150
DAnalyte
LCS LCS
Benzene 50.0 46.9 ug/L 94 80 -121
Bromobenzene 50.0 48.6 ug/L 97 72 -130
Bromochloromethane 50.0 50.8 ug/L 102 73 -137
Bromodichloromethane 50.0 51.1 ug/L 102 75 -131
Bromoform 50.0 49.0 ug/L 98 65 -140
Bromomethane 50.0 46.9 ug/L 94 50 -150
2-Butanone 250 220 ug/L 88 70 -144
sec-Butylbenzene 50.0 52.6 ug/L 105 72 -140
n-Butylbenzene 50.0 50.5 ug/L 101 68 -140
tert-Butylbenzene 50.0 53.1 ug/L 106 76 -135
Carbon disulfide 50.0 41.0 ug/L 82 74 -137
Carbon Tetrachloride 50.0 58.0 ug/L 116 71 -137
Chlorobenzene 50.0 50.3 ug/L 101 80 -121
Chlorodibromomethane 50.0 57.4 ug/L 115 68 -137
Chloroethane 50.0 38.7 ug/L 77 50 -146
Chloroform 50.0 51.2 ug/L 102 73 -131
Chloromethane 50.0 35.4 ug/L 71 30 -132
2-Chlorotoluene 50.0 51.1 ug/L 102 74 -135
4-Chlorotoluene 50.0 53.1 ug/L 106 74 -132
TestAmerica NashvillePage 10 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
Method: SW846 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: 11H3462-BS1
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total
Analysis Batch: U014652 Prep Batch: 11H3462_P
Spike
Added Result Qualifier Unit % Rec
% Rec.
Limits
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 50.0 43.3 ug/L 87 56 -145
DAnalyte
LCS LCS
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)50.0 51.2 ug/L 102 80 -135
Dibromomethane 50.0 49.4 ug/L 99 78 -133
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 54.3 ug/L 109 80 -120
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 53.9 ug/L 108 80 -128
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 54.1 ug/L 108 80 -125
Dichlorodifluoromethane 50.0 38.0 ug/L 76 30 -132
1,1-Dichloroethane 50.0 44.9 ug/L 90 75 -125
1,2-Dichloroethane 50.0 48.4 ug/L 97 70 -134
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.0 43.6 ug/L 87 71 -132
1,1-Dichloroethene 50.0 47.8 ug/L 96 73 -125
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.0 45.0 ug/L 90 77 -125
1,3-Dichloropropane 50.0 45.8 ug/L 92 76 -125
1,2-Dichloropropane 50.0 41.0 ug/L 82 72 -120
2,2-Dichloropropane 50.0 41.4 ug/L 83 50 -150
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.0 48.2 ug/L 96 70 -140
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.0 47.8 ug/L 96 62 -139
1,1-Dichloropropene 50.0 47.8 ug/L 96 78 -126
Ethylbenzene 50.0 49.3 ug/L 99 78 -133
Hexachlorobutadiene 50.0 46.6 ug/L 93 70 -150
2-Hexanone 250 209 ug/L 84 60 -150
Isopropylbenzene 50.0 55.6 ug/L 111 69 -120
p-Isopropyltoluene 50.0 51.8 ug/L 104 72 -134
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether 50.0 43.7 ug/L 87 76 -120
Methylene Chloride 50.0 46.6 ug/L 93 80 -133
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 250 203 ug/L 81 62 -146
Naphthalene 50.0 51.3 ug/L 103 71 -139
n-Propylbenzene 50.0 51.1 ug/L 102 70 -143
Styrene 50.0 51.7 ug/L 103 80 -136
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.0 55.2 ug/L 110 80 -130
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.0 46.4 ug/L 93 73 -131
Tetrachloroethene 50.0 52.1 ug/L 104 77 -131
Toluene 50.0 49.8 ug/L 100 78 -125
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 50.0 51.7 ug/L 103 71 -138
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.0 52.3 ug/L 105 74 -136
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 50.0 49.7 ug/L 99 80 -123
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 50.0 54.9 ug/L 110 75 -137
Trichloroethene 50.0 52.7 ug/L 105 74 -139
Trichlorofluoromethane 50.0 48.9 ug/L 98 60 -133
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 50.0 48.5 ug/L 97 64 -127
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 50.0 53.6 ug/L 107 75 -134
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 50.0 51.8 ug/L 104 77 -134
Vinyl chloride 50.0 38.0 ug/L 76 60 -122
Xylenes, total 150 153 ug/L 102 78 -134
Diisopropyl Ether 50.0 37.6 ug/L 75 63 -136
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)100 88.6 ug/L 89 78 -126
Qualifier % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 63 -140
Surrogate
98
LCS LCS
TestAmerica NashvillePage 11 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
Method: SW846 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control SampleLab Sample ID: 11H3462-BS1
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total
Analysis Batch: U014652 Prep Batch: 11H3462_P
Qualifier % Recovery Limits
Dibromofluoromethane 73 -131
Surrogate
105
LCS LCS
98Toluene-d8 80 -120
994-Bromofluorobenzene 79 -125
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample DupLab Sample ID: 11H3462-BSD1
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total
Analysis Batch: U014652 Prep Batch: 11H3462_P
Spike
Added Result Qualifier Unit % Rec
% Rec.
Limits RPD Limit
Acetone 250 247 ug/L 99 56 -150 6 31
DAnalyte
RPDLCS Dup LCS Dup
Benzene 50.0 46.1 ug/L 92 80 -121 2 12
Bromobenzene 50.0 47.4 ug/L 95 72 -130 2 23
Bromochloromethane 50.0 49.4 ug/L 99 73 -137 3 32
Bromodichloromethane 50.0 50.6 ug/L 101 75 -131 0.8 13
Bromoform 50.0 47.6 ug/L 95 65 -140 3 18
Bromomethane 50.0 46.0 ug/L 92 50 -150 2 50
2-Butanone 250 232 ug/L 93 70 -144 5 37
sec-Butylbenzene 50.0 50.8 ug/L 102 72 -140 4 21
n-Butylbenzene 50.0 48.4 ug/L 97 68 -140 4 11
tert-Butylbenzene 50.0 51.0 ug/L 102 76 -135 4 20
Carbon disulfide 50.0 40.7 ug/L 81 74 -137 0.9 28
Carbon Tetrachloride 50.0 57.0 ug/L 114 71 -137 2 26
Chlorobenzene 50.0 49.0 ug/L 98 80 -121 3 11
Chlorodibromomethane 50.0 56.1 ug/L 112 68 -137 2 16
Chloroethane 50.0 38.0 ug/L 76 50 -146 2 35
Chloroform 50.0 50.8 ug/L 102 73 -131 0.7 32
Chloromethane 50.0 34.7 ug/L 69 30 -132 2 34
2-Chlorotoluene 50.0 48.6 ug/L 97 74 -135 5 22
4-Chlorotoluene 50.0 50.3 ug/L 101 74 -132 5 22
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 50.0 44.0 ug/L 88 56 -145 2 21
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)50.0 50.1 ug/L 100 80 -135 2 10
Dibromomethane 50.0 49.6 ug/L 99 78 -133 0.5 11
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 52.1 ug/L 104 80 -120 4 10
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 51.9 ug/L 104 80 -128 4 18
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 50.0 52.2 ug/L 104 80 -125 3 11
Dichlorodifluoromethane 50.0 38.3 ug/L 77 30 -132 0.7 32
1,1-Dichloroethane 50.0 44.1 ug/L 88 75 -125 2 34
1,2-Dichloroethane 50.0 48.4 ug/L 97 70 -134 0.02 25
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.0 43.5 ug/L 87 71 -132 0.4 32
1,1-Dichloroethene 50.0 47.6 ug/L 95 73 -125 0.3 31
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 50.0 45.7 ug/L 91 77 -125 2 32
1,3-Dichloropropane 50.0 44.0 ug/L 88 76 -125 4 20
1,2-Dichloropropane 50.0 40.5 ug/L 81 72 -120 1 11
2,2-Dichloropropane 50.0 40.4 ug/L 81 50 -150 3 11
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.0 47.0 ug/L 94 70 -140 3 35
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 50.0 45.5 ug/L 91 62 -139 5 26
1,1-Dichloropropene 50.0 47.0 ug/L 94 78 -126 2 18
Ethylbenzene 50.0 48.3 ug/L 97 78 -133 2 12
Hexachlorobutadiene 50.0 45.0 ug/L 90 70 -150 3 21
TestAmerica NashvillePage 12 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
Method: SW846 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample DupLab Sample ID: 11H3462-BSD1
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total
Analysis Batch: U014652 Prep Batch: 11H3462_P
Spike
Added Result Qualifier Unit % Rec
% Rec.
Limits RPD Limit
2-Hexanone 250 214 ug/L 86 60 -150 2 20
DAnalyte
RPDLCS Dup LCS Dup
Isopropylbenzene 50.0 54.2 ug/L 108 69 -120 3 15
p-Isopropyltoluene 50.0 49.5 ug/L 99 72 -134 5 18
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether 50.0 43.4 ug/L 87 76 -120 0.7 32
Methylene Chloride 50.0 46.7 ug/L 93 80 -133 0.1 36
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 250 206 ug/L 82 62 -146 1 35
Naphthalene 50.0 50.9 ug/L 102 71 -139 0.8 30
n-Propylbenzene 50.0 49.5 ug/L 99 70 -143 3 23
Styrene 50.0 50.0 ug/L 100 80 -136 3 29
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.0 54.3 ug/L 109 80 -130 2 11
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 50.0 45.6 ug/L 91 73 -131 2 28
Tetrachloroethene 50.0 50.5 ug/L 101 77 -131 3 16
Toluene 50.0 48.4 ug/L 97 78 -125 3 35
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 50.0 51.7 ug/L 103 71 -138 0.1 28
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50.0 50.9 ug/L 102 74 -136 3 23
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 50.0 48.8 ug/L 98 80 -123 2 21
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 50.0 53.8 ug/L 108 75 -137 2 29
Trichloroethene 50.0 51.7 ug/L 103 74 -139 2 11
Trichlorofluoromethane 50.0 47.6 ug/L 95 60 -133 3 33
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 50.0 47.3 ug/L 95 64 -127 2 25
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 50.0 51.2 ug/L 102 75 -134 5 21
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 50.0 49.5 ug/L 99 77 -134 5 20
Vinyl chloride 50.0 37.1 ug/L 74 60 -122 2 32
Xylenes, total 150 149 ug/L 99 78 -134 3 18
Diisopropyl Ether 50.0 36.9 ug/L 74 63 -136 2 32
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)100 89.1 ug/L 89 78 -126 0.6 33
Qualifier % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 63 -140
Surrogate
99
LCS Dup LCS Dup
107Dibromofluoromethane 73 -131
97Toluene-d8 80 -120
984-Bromofluorobenzene 79 -125
Client Sample ID: Matrix SpikeLab Sample ID: 11H3462-MS1
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total
Analysis Batch: U014652 Prep Batch: 11H3462_P
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
Spike
Added Result Qualifier Unit % Rec
% Rec.
Limits
Acetone ND 250 220 ug/L 88 56 -150
DAnalyte
Matrix Spike Matrix Spike
Benzene 0.350 50.0 53.2 ug/L 106 65 -151
Bromobenzene ND 50.0 50.1 ug/L 100 69 -142
Bromochloromethane ND 50.0 58.6 ug/L 117 64 -154
Bromodichloromethane ND 50.0 58.9 ug/L 118 75 -138
Bromoform ND 50.0 52.6 ug/L 105 55 -153
Bromomethane ND 50.0 38.2 ug/L 76 13 -176
2-Butanone ND 250 234 ug/L 94 45 -164
sec-Butylbenzene ND 50.0 55.1 ug/L 110 68 -159
n-Butylbenzene ND 50.0 52.9 ug/L 106 67 -151
tert-Butylbenzene ND 50.0 55.1 ug/L 110 73 -153
TestAmerica NashvillePage 13 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
Method: SW846 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Matrix SpikeLab Sample ID: 11H3462-MS1
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total
Analysis Batch: U014652 Prep Batch: 11H3462_P
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
Spike
Added Result Qualifier Unit % Rec
% Rec.
Limits
Carbon disulfide ND 50.0 48.3 ug/L 97 33 -187
DAnalyte
Matrix Spike Matrix Spike
Carbon Tetrachloride ND 50.0 70.7 ug/L 141 64 -157
Chlorobenzene ND 50.0 54.5 ug/L 109 78 -136
Chlorodibromomethane ND 50.0 62.5 ug/L 125 64 -145
Chloroethane ND 50.0 44.9 ug/L 90 48 -159
Chloroform ND 50.0 58.6 ug/L 117 72 -145
Chloromethane ND 50.0 40.4 ug/L 81 10 -194
2-Chlorotoluene ND 50.0 52.9 ug/L 106 66 -155
4-Chlorotoluene ND 50.0 55.3 ug/L 111 69 -149
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 50.0 45.8 ug/L 92 49 -162
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND 50.0 54.1 ug/L 108 70 -152
Dibromomethane ND 50.0 57.1 ug/L 114 75 -141
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.0 55.9 ug/L 112 75 -135
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.0 55.3 ug/L 111 72 -146
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.0 55.3 ug/L 111 80 -136
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 50.0 42.5 ug/L 85 23 -159
1,1-Dichloroethane ND 50.0 50.5 ug/L 101 64 -154
1,2-Dichloroethane ND 50.0 57.1 ug/L 114 72 -137
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 50.0 51.5 ug/L 103 57 -154
1,1-Dichloroethene ND 50.0 55.3 ug/L 111 34 -151
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 50.0 53.9 ug/L 108 57 -157
1,3-Dichloropropane ND 50.0 48.5 ug/L 97 71 -137
1,2-Dichloropropane ND 50.0 45.1 ug/L 90 71 -139
2,2-Dichloropropane ND 50.0 58.2 ug/L 116 10 -198
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 50.0 52.9 ug/L 106 56 -156
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 50.0 52.0 ug/L 104 47 -157
1,1-Dichloropropene ND 50.0 55.2 ug/L 110 70 -155
Ethylbenzene ND 50.0 55.0 ug/L 110 68 -157
Hexachlorobutadiene ND 50.0 48.8 ug/L 98 47 -173
2-Hexanone ND 250 231 ug/L 92 57 -154
Isopropylbenzene ND 50.0 62.0 ug/L 124 69 -139
p-Isopropyltoluene ND 50.0 54.2 ug/L 108 69 -151
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether 0.370 50.0 49.2 ug/L 98 56 -152
Methylene Chloride ND 50.0 52.6 ug/L 105 71 -136
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 250 231 ug/L 92 62 -159
Naphthalene ND 50.0 54.7 ug/L 109 56 -161
n-Propylbenzene ND 50.0 53.2 ug/L 106 61 -167
Styrene ND 50.0 55.6 ug/L 111 69 -150
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 50.0 61.1 ug/L 122 80 -140
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 50.0 49.4 ug/L 99 76 -141
Tetrachloroethene ND 50.0 58.4 ug/L 117 63 -155
Toluene ND 50.0 54.8 ug/L 110 61 -153
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 50.0 54.1 ug/L 108 57 -155
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 50.0 53.1 ug/L 106 64 -147
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 50.0 53.6 ug/L 107 74 -138
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 50.0 65.4 ug/L 131 78 -153
Trichloroethene ND 50.0 59.0 ug/L 118 74 -139
Trichlorofluoromethane ND 50.0 57.4 ug/L 115 53 -149
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 50.0 49.7 ug/L 99 49 -148
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 50.0 55.3 ug/L 111 67 -151
TestAmerica NashvillePage 14 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
Method: SW846 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Matrix SpikeLab Sample ID: 11H3462-MS1
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total
Analysis Batch: U014652 Prep Batch: 11H3462_P
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
Spike
Added Result Qualifier Unit % Rec
% Rec.
Limits
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 50.0 54.0 ug/L 108 69 -150
DAnalyte
Matrix Spike Matrix Spike
Vinyl chloride ND 50.0 43.5 ug/L 87 53 -137
Xylenes, total ND 150 171 ug/L 114 68 -158
Diisopropyl Ether ND 50.0 41.0 ug/L 82 59 -145
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)ND 100 105 ug/L 105 60 -152
Qualifier % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 63 -140
Surrogate
106
Matrix Spike Matrix Spike
109Dibromofluoromethane 73 -131
96Toluene-d8 80 -120
954-Bromofluorobenzene 79 -125
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike DuplicateLab Sample ID: 11H3462-MSD1
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total
Analysis Batch: U014652 Prep Batch: 11H3462_P
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
Spike
Added Result Qualifier Unit % Rec
% Rec.
Limits RPD Limit
Acetone ND 250 214 ug/L 86 56 -150 3 31
DAnalyte
RPDMatrix Spike Dup Matrix Spike Dup
Benzene 0.350 50.0 50.7 ug/L 101 65 -151 5 12
Bromobenzene ND 50.0 48.2 ug/L 96 69 -142 4 23
Bromochloromethane ND 50.0 54.6 ug/L 109 64 -154 7 32
Bromodichloromethane ND 50.0 55.7 ug/L 111 75 -138 6 13
Bromoform ND 50.0 49.9 ug/L 100 55 -153 5 18
Bromomethane ND 50.0 41.9 ug/L 84 13 -176 9 50
2-Butanone ND 250 236 ug/L 94 45 -164 0.7 37
sec-Butylbenzene ND 50.0 51.9 ug/L 104 68 -159 6 21
n-Butylbenzene ND 50.0 50.5 ug/L 101 67 -151 5 11
tert-Butylbenzene ND 50.0 52.1 ug/L 104 73 -153 6 20
Carbon disulfide ND 50.0 45.2 ug/L 90 33 -187 7 28
Carbon Tetrachloride ND 50.0 64.2 ug/L 128 64 -157 10 26
Chlorobenzene ND 50.0 51.7 ug/L 103 78 -136 5 11
Chlorodibromomethane ND 50.0 59.6 ug/L 119 64 -145 5 16
Chloroethane ND 50.0 42.3 ug/L 85 48 -159 6 35
Chloroform ND 50.0 55.5 ug/L 111 72 -145 5 32
Chloromethane ND 50.0 36.7 ug/L 73 10 -194 9 34
2-Chlorotoluene ND 50.0 49.6 ug/L 99 66 -155 6 22
4-Chlorotoluene ND 50.0 52.2 ug/L 104 69 -149 6 22
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND 50.0 47.0 ug/L 94 49 -162 3 21
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ND 50.0 53.7 ug/L 107 70 -152 0.8 10
Dibromomethane ND 50.0 53.5 ug/L 107 75 -141 6 11
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.0 53.9 ug/L 108 75 -135 4 10
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.0 52.8 ug/L 106 72 -146 4 18
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 50.0 54.1 ug/L 108 80 -136 2 11
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 50.0 39.6 ug/L 79 23 -159 7 32
1,1-Dichloroethane ND 50.0 49.6 ug/L 99 64 -154 2 34
1,2-Dichloroethane ND 50.0 54.4 ug/L 109 72 -137 5 25
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 50.0 49.0 ug/L 98 57 -154 5 32
1,1-Dichloroethene ND 50.0 51.6 ug/L 103 34 -151 7 31
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 50.0 48.8 ug/L 98 57 -157 10 32
TestAmerica NashvillePage 15 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
QC Sample Results
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
Method: SW846 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B (Continued)
Client Sample ID: Matrix Spike DuplicateLab Sample ID: 11H3462-MSD1
Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total
Analysis Batch: U014652 Prep Batch: 11H3462_P
Sample
Result
Sample
Qualifier
Spike
Added Result Qualifier Unit % Rec
% Rec.
Limits RPD Limit
1,3-Dichloropropane ND 50.0 46.9 ug/L 94 71 -137 3 20
DAnalyte
RPDMatrix Spike Dup Matrix Spike Dup
1,2-Dichloropropane ND 50.0 43.3 ug/L 87 71 -139 4 11
2,2-Dichloropropane ND 50.0 53.6 ug/L 107 10 -198 8 11
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 50.0 50.3 ug/L 101 56 -156 5 35
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 50.0 49.7 ug/L 99 47 -157 5 26
1,1-Dichloropropene ND 50.0 50.1 ug/L 100 70 -155 10 18
Ethylbenzene ND 50.0 51.1 ug/L 102 68 -157 7 12
Hexachlorobutadiene ND 50.0 47.1 ug/L 94 47 -173 4 21
2-Hexanone ND 250 229 ug/L 91 57 -154 0.9 20
Isopropylbenzene ND 50.0 56.8 ug/L 114 69 -139 9 15
p-Isopropyltoluene ND 50.0 50.8 ug/L 102 69 -151 7 18
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether 0.370 50.0 48.5 ug/L 96 56 -152 1 32
Methylene Chloride ND 50.0 50.8 ug/L 102 71 -136 4 36
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 250 229 ug/L 92 62 -159 0.5 35
Naphthalene ND 50.0 56.5 ug/L 113 56 -161 3 30
n-Propylbenzene ND 50.0 50.2 ug/L 100 61 -167 6 23
Styrene ND 50.0 52.5 ug/L 105 69 -150 6 29
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 50.0 57.4 ug/L 115 80 -140 6 11
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 50.0 48.4 ug/L 97 76 -141 2 28
Tetrachloroethene ND 50.0 54.2 ug/L 108 63 -155 7 16
Toluene ND 50.0 51.4 ug/L 103 61 -153 6 35
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 50.0 54.9 ug/L 110 57 -155 1 28
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 50.0 54.0 ug/L 108 64 -147 2 23
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 50.0 52.3 ug/L 105 74 -138 2 21
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 50.0 61.6 ug/L 123 78 -153 6 29
Trichloroethene ND 50.0 54.6 ug/L 109 74 -139 8 11
Trichlorofluoromethane ND 50.0 52.8 ug/L 106 53 -149 8 33
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 50.0 48.9 ug/L 98 49 -148 2 25
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 50.0 51.7 ug/L 103 67 -151 7 21
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 50.0 50.5 ug/L 101 69 -150 7 20
Vinyl chloride ND 50.0 41.7 ug/L 83 53 -137 4 32
Xylenes, total ND 150 158 ug/L 105 68 -158 8 18
Diisopropyl Ether ND 50.0 39.4 ug/L 79 59 -145 4 32
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)ND 100 97.8 ug/L 98 60 -152 8 33
Qualifier % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 63 -140
Surrogate
105
Matrix Spike Dup Matrix Spike Dup
109Dibromofluoromethane 73 -131
96Toluene-d8 80 -120
964-Bromofluorobenzene 79 -125
TestAmerica NashvillePage 16 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
QC Association Summary
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
GCMS Volatiles
Analysis Batch: U014652
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Total Water SW846 8260B 11H3462_P11H3462-BS1 Lab Control Sample
Total Water SW846 8260B 11H3462_P11H3462-BSD1 Lab Control Sample Dup
Total Water SW846 8260B 11H3462_P11H3462-BLK1 Method Blank
Total Water SW846 8260B 11H3462_PNUH2153-01 HHMW-2
Total Water SW846 8260B 11H3462_PNUH2153-02 HHMW-3
Total Water SW846 8260B 11H3462_P11H3462-MS1 Matrix Spike
Total Water SW846 8260B 11H3462_P11H3462-MSD1 Matrix Spike Duplicate
Prep Batch: 11H3462_P
Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch
Total Water EPA 5030B11H3462-BS1 Lab Control Sample
Total Water EPA 5030B11H3462-BSD1 Lab Control Sample Dup
Total Water EPA 5030B11H3462-BLK1 Method Blank
Total Water EPA 5030BNUH2153-01 HHMW-2
Total Water EPA 5030BNUH2153-02 HHMW-3
Total Water EPA 5030B11H3462-MS1 Matrix Spike
Total Water EPA 5030B11H3462-MSD1 Matrix Spike Duplicate
TestAmerica NashvillePage 17 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Lab Chronicle
Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153
Project/Site: PTT-001
Client Sample ID: HHMW-2 Lab Sample ID: NUH2153-01
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 08/13/11 11:40
Date Received: 08/16/11 08:20
Batch
Type
Batch
Method Run
Dilution
Factor
Batch
Number
Prepared
Or Analyzed Analyst LabPrep Type
Total Prep EPA 5030B 08/17/11 05:30 AAN1.00 11H3462_P TAL NSH
Total Analysis SW846 8260B 1.00 U014652 08/17/11 09:42 CMM TAL NSH
Client Sample ID: HHMW-3 Lab Sample ID: NUH2153-02
Matrix: WaterDate Collected: 08/13/11 10:40
Date Received: 08/16/11 08:20
Batch
Type
Batch
Method Run
Dilution
Factor
Batch
Number
Prepared
Or Analyzed Analyst LabPrep Type
Total Prep EPA 5030B 08/17/11 05:30 AAN1.00 11H3462_P TAL NSH
Total Analysis SW846 8260B 1.00 U014652 08/17/11 10:10 CMM TAL NSH
Laboratory References:
TAL NSH = TestAmerica Nashville, 2960 Foster Creighton Road, Nashville, TN 37204, TEL [phone]
TestAmerica NashvillePage 18 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Method Summary
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
Method Method Description LaboratoryProtocol
SW846 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260B TAL NSH
Protocol References:
Laboratory References:
TAL NSH = TestAmerica Nashville, 2960 Foster Creighton Road, Nashville, TN 37204, TEL [phone]
TestAmerica NashvillePage 19 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Certification Summary
TestAmerica Job ID: NUH2153Client: Hart & Hickman (2162)
Project/Site: PTT-001
Laboratory Program Certification IDAuthorityEPA Region
TestAmerica Nashville 0453.07ISO/IEC 17025A2LA
TestAmerica Nashville 453.07WY USTA2LA
TestAmerica Nashville 100790IHLAPAIHA
TestAmerica Nashville 41150State ProgramAlabama 4
TestAmerica Nashville UST-087Alaska USTAlaska 10
TestAmerica Nashville AZ0473State ProgramArizona 9
TestAmerica Nashville 88-0737State ProgramArkansas 6
TestAmerica Nashville 3744CALACALA
TestAmerica Nashville 1168CANELACCalifornia9
TestAmerica Nashville N/AState ProgramColorado 8
TestAmerica Nashville PH-0220State ProgramConnecticut 1
TestAmerica Nashville E87358NELACFlorida4
TestAmerica Nashville 200010NELACIllinois5
TestAmerica Nashville 131State ProgramIowa 7
TestAmerica Nashville E-10229NELACKansas7
TestAmerica Nashville 19Kentucky USTKentucky 4
TestAmerica Nashville 90038State ProgramKentucky 4
TestAmerica Nashville LA100011NELACLouisiana6
TestAmerica Nashville 30613NELACLouisiana6
TestAmerica Nashville 316State ProgramMaryland 3
TestAmerica Nashville M-TN032State ProgramMassachusetts 1
TestAmerica Nashville 047-999-345NELACMinnesota5
TestAmerica Nashville N/AState ProgramMississippi 4
TestAmerica Nashville NAMT DEQ USTMontana 8
TestAmerica Nashville TN00032State ProgramNevada 9
TestAmerica Nashville 2963NELACNew Hampshire 1
TestAmerica Nashville TN965NELACNew Jersey 2
TestAmerica Nashville 11342NELACNew York 2
TestAmerica Nashville 387North Carolina DENRNorth Carolina 4
TestAmerica Nashville R-146State ProgramNorth Dakota 8
TestAmerica Nashville CL0033OVAPOhio5
TestAmerica Nashville 9412State ProgramOklahoma 6
TestAmerica Nashville TN200001NELACOregon10
TestAmerica Nashville 68-00585NELACPennsylvania3
TestAmerica Nashville LAO00268State ProgramRhode Island 1
TestAmerica Nashville 84009State ProgramSouth Carolina 4
TestAmerica Nashville 84009State ProgramSouth Carolina 4
TestAmerica Nashville 2008State ProgramTennessee 4
TestAmerica Nashville T104704077-09-TXNELACTexas6
TestAmerica Nashville S-48469USDAUSDA
TestAmerica Nashville TANNELACUtah8
TestAmerica Nashville 460152NELAC Secondary ABVirginia 3
TestAmerica Nashville 00323State ProgramVirginia 3
TestAmerica Nashville C789State ProgramWashington 10
TestAmerica Nashville 219West Virginia DEPWest Virginia 3
TestAmerica Nashville 998020430State ProgramWisconsin 5
Accreditation may not be offered or required for all methods and analytes reported in this package. Please contact your project manager for the laboratory’s
current list of certified methods and analytes.
TestAmerica NashvillePage 20 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Page 21 of 22 08/22/2011
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Page 22 of 22 08/22/2011
1234567
8
9
10
11
1

Appendix A
Vapor Mitigation System Specifications
Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Work Plan M.H.O.C., LLC Brownfields Agreement Former Dixie Trucking Facility Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTT-001

Unless otherwise approved, installation of the mitigation system shall be based upon plans
prepared by Hart & Hickman, PC and the following specifications:

General

System installation shall comply with current/applicable codes.

System installation contractor shall comply with applicable OSHA, state and local standards
and/or regulations.

System installation contractor shall confirm all field conditions as well as dimensions and
positions indicated on plans and notify H&H of any conflicts with plans before proceeding with
system installation.

System installation contractor shall follow manufacturers’ instructions and specifications for
installation and use of all materials and equipment.

Systems shall be installed as permanent, integral additions to the building.
Extraction Point/Slab Penetration

A set of two penetrations will be installed on each side of a continuous foundation footer
assumed to run beneath the slab in-line with the columns (refer to Section 3.1 of the work plan).

4 to 5-inch diameter slab penetrations shall be installed at each extraction point location.

Penetrations will be installed as near a steel roof support column as possible.

To the extent possible using hand tools, material shall be excavated from the area immediately
below the slab penetration point at each extraction point location to provide optimum pressure
field extension of the sub-slab communication zone.

Extraction point pipe intakes shall be installed so that condensation water drains downward into
the ground beneath the slab.

Extraction point intake shall be 4-in diameter PVC or ABS, schedule 40 pipe.
2

Extraction point pipe shall be reduced from 4 to 3-in diameter PVC or ABS, schedule 40 vent
pipe.

Penetrations in the slab shall be sealed with materials (i.e., non-shrink mortar, grouts, expanding
foam materials, elastomeric joint sealant, etc) that provide a permanent air-tight seal. Placement
and tooling must be in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications and result in no gaps or
voids after curing.

A minimum 4-in diameter x 3 ft tall steel bollard shall be installed adjacent to each extraction
point on the side opposite of the roof support column.

Vent Pipe

3-in diameter vent pipe shall run from the extraction point reduction joint of each slab
penetration to the roof support column and the two vent pipes from the set of penetrations shall
be joined using a three-way connector. A single 3-in diameter vent pipe shall run from the
connector to the mitigation fan and from the mitigation fan to the point of exhaust discharge.

Vent pipes shall be installed so that condensation water drains downward into the ground
beneath the slab.

Vent piping shall be 3-in diameter PVC or ABS, schedule 40.

All vent pipe joints and connections shall be permanently sealed with adhesives as specified by
the manufacturer of the pipe material. Joints and connections shall be made air tight.

Point of exhaust venting discharge shall be a minimum of 12 inches above the roofline, 10 feet or
more above ground level, and 10 feet or more from any operable window, chimney, door, or
other openings into conditioned spaces of building that is less than 2 feet below the exhaust
point.

Where installation requires pipes or ducts to penetrate a firewall or other fire resistance rated
wall, penetrations shall be protected in accordance with applicable building, mechanical, and
electrical codes.

All positively pressurized portions of vent pipe (i.e., pipe from the mitigation fan to the point of
exhaust discharge) shall be located outside habitable space of the building.

Vent pipes shall be fastened to the structure of the building with hangers, strapping, or other
supports that shall adequately secure the vent pipe material. Supports shall be installed a
minimum of every 10 ft on horizontal runs. Vertical runs shall be secured either above or below
the points of penetration through the slab, or a minimum of 10 ft on runs that do not penetrate the
slab. These pipes shall be supported or secured in a permanent manner that prevents their
downward movement into the soil beneath the slab.
3

Mitigation System Fan

Mitigation fans shall contain minimum 3-in diameter fan duct and be minimum 40 to 60 watt
units. The fans must be capable of producing a minimum 2.0 inches water column (in WC)
pressure (vacuum) and 5.0 cubic ft per minute air flow when operated at 2.0 in WC.

Mitigation fans shall be designed or otherwise sealed to reduce the potential for leakage of soil
gas from the fan housing.

Mitigation fans shall be installed on an exterior portion of the building and in an accessible
location. Mitigation fans shall be rated for outdoor use or installed in a water tight protective
housing.

Mitigation fans shall be installed in a vertical run of the vent pipe.

Mitigation fans shall be installed in a configuration that minimizes condensation buildup in the
fan housing.

Mitigation fans shall be mounted and secured in a manner that minimizes transfer of vibration to
the structural framing of the building.

Mitigation fans shall be connected to vent pipe using removable couplings or flexible
connections that can be tightly secured to both the fan and the vent pipe.

Electrical

Electric wiring shall conform to provisions of the National Electric Code and any additional local
regulations.

Electric wiring shall not be located in or chased through the mitigation installation ducting or any
other heating or cooling ductwork.

Mitigation fans shall be hard-wired into an electrical circuit.

An electrical disconnect switch shall be installed in mitigation fan circuits to permit deactivation
of the fan for maintenance or repair.

System Monitoring and Labeling

Mitigation systems shall include a u-tube manometer that clearly displays units of pressure in
inches of water column. The manometer shall be located on the vent pipe (above the three-way
connector that joins the two vent pipes from the set of penetrations) where it is easily seen by
building occupants and protected from damage or destruction. The manometers shall be clearly
4

marked to indicate the range or zone of pressure readings that existed when the system was
initially activated.

Mitigation system fan housings, electric switches, and vent pipe approximately 5 ft above the
slab penetration shall be labeled "SOIL VAPOR MITIGAITION SYSTEM.” The labels shall be
legible from a distance of at least three feet. In addition, circuit breakers controlling the circuits
on which the mitigation system fan operates shall be labeled “MITIGATION SYSTEM.”