09042 Scott Aviation Final EMP 20180125

1
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in the
North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a project manager for the program.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments to their project manager prior to any site earthmoving or other
development related activities. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it must be completed,
reviewed by the program, and signed by all signers at the bottom. Consult your project
manager if you have questions.

GENERAL INFORMATION

Date: 1/25/2018

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Former Scott Aviation

Brownfields Project Number: 09042-05-090

Brownfields Property Address: 309, 310, and 502 West Crowell Street; 316, 500, and 503 West
Jefferson Street; and 500 W. Franklin Street; Monroe, North Carolina 28112. Note this EMP addresses
only 309 West Crowell Street and 316 West Jefferson Street (Parcel I).

Brownfields Property Area (acres): 13.265

Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click here to enter text.

Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click here to enter text.

COMMUNICATIONS

Prospective Developer (PD): City of Monroe, a North Carolina Municipal Corporation, Larry Faison
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-282-4501…..Mobile: Click here to enter text.
Email: [e-mail]
Primary PD Contact: Mary Katherine H. Stukes, Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-335-9495 Mobile: [phone]
Email:
Environmental Consultant: AECOM, Evelyn Rogers (Project Manager)
Phone Numbers: Office: 864-234-2253…..Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Carolyn Minnich
2
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
Office: 704 661 0330
Email: [e-mail]
Other DENR Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
DEQ IHSB: John Walch
Email: [e-mail]
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
Advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept minimum
notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:
On-site assessment or remedial activities: Within 10 days ☒
Construction or grading start: Within 10 days ☒
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: Within 48 hours ☒
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood, or soil erosion control
measures in area of contamination, venting of explosive environments):
Within 48 hours ☒
Installation of mitigation systems: Within 10 days ☒
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement
redevelopment activities: (as applicable): Within 30 days ☒
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
1)Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☐ Residential ☐ Recreational ☒ Institutional ☒ Commercial ☒ Office ☐Retail ☐ Industrial
☒ Other specify: Municipal Governmental, Parking, Gasoline Station, Restaurant. Uses are defined in
the Notice of Brownfields Property for Brownfields Project Number 09042-05-090, Land Use
Restrictions
2)Summary of Redevelopment Plans (attach conceptual or detailed plans as available):
a)Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
b)Do plans include removal of building foundation slab(s) or pavement:
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
c)Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement and other structures: Parcel I (309 West Crowell Street and 316 West
Jefferson Street): removal of portions of building slab and excavation and disposal of soils
beneath. Parcel II (310 West Crowell Street): demolition and soil removal plans have not yet
been finalized, as specific redevelopment plans remain uncertain; however, such activities will
3
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
be described in detail in a future EMP to be developed for that parcel. In addition, plans have
not been finalized for other portions of the Brownfields Site (former Enquirer-Journal property
at 502 West Crowell Street, 500 and 503 West Jefferson Street, and 500 West Franklin Street).

3) Which category of risk-based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement?
☐ Residential ☒ Non-residential or Industrial/Commercial

Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall be cited in the Brownfields
Agreement for comparison purposes.

4) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Phase I start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
Click here to enter a date.
Parcel I (309 West Crowell Street and 316 West Jefferson Street) soil remediation tentatively
scheduled to begin early 2018; duration ~ 1 month. No new construction as part of this phase;
however, future construction is planned for both Parcel I (309 West Crowell Street and 316 West
Jefferson Street) and Parcel II (310 West Crowell Street), to be outlined in a future EMP.
Redevelopment plans (beyond the activities described in this EMP) have not yet been finalized and
the start date and duration for additional activities is unknown.

b) If applicable, Phase 2 start date and anticipated duration (specify activities during each
phase): Click here to enter a date.

c) Additional phases planned? If yes, specify activities if known:
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Not in the foreseeable future ☐Decision pending
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: Click here to enter a date.

CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Contaminated Media (attach tabulated data summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with
sample locations):
Part 1. Soil: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Suspected
Part 6. Sub-Slab Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected

4
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
PART 1. SOIL – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
1)Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list specific compounds): 1,1,1-Trichloroethane; 1,1-
Dichloroethene; 1,2-Dichloroethane; cis-1,2-Dichloroethene; Tetrachloroethene; Trichloroethene;
Vinyl chloride. On Parcel I (309 West Crowell Street and 316 West Jefferson Street):detected
concentrations of tetrachloroethylene on Parcel I (309 West Crowell Street and 316 West Jefferson
Street) are listed in the attachment “Tabulated Data Summaries (Groundwater, Vapor Intrusion, and
Soil) and Figures”, Exibit 2 – Soil: Sample locations SB03a-I-8’ and SB06c-S-2’ ; sample locations
SB03a and SB06c are shown on Sheet 3 of 4 of EXHIBIT B to the Notice of Brownfields Property –
SURVEY PLAT.
2)Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet): 6-7 feet (Parcel I); 12 feet (Parcel II); N/A (E-J
Property)
3)Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet): Current plans include remediation of
Parcel I (309 West Crowell Street and 316 West Jefferson Street) soils – approximately 320 square
feet.
4)Depths of soil to be excavated (feet): 4 feet in one excavation area and 10 feet in one excavation
area (both excavation areas on Parcel I(309 West Crowell Street and 316 West Jefferson Street)).
5)Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan): Est 132 CY (grading
plan not available; the two excavation areas are shown in the attachment “Soil Detailed Site Plans”
on sheets C-2 (Enlargement of Site Layout and Excavaton Plan) and C-3 (Excavation Details)).
6)Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants: Est
132 CY
7)Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable: Est 132 CY
IMPORTED FILL SOIL
1)Will fill soil be imported to the site? ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
2)If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported? 132 CY
3)If yes, what is the depth of fill soil to be used at the property? 4ft in one excavation area; 10 ft in
one excavation area.
If a range of depths, please list the range.
4)PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide plan to analyze fill soil to
demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards and can be considered clean for use at the
Brownfields property (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury, lead,
selenium and silver)
☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
5
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium (speciated
according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver, thallium, and
zinc)
☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method: Click here to enter text.
☒ Known borrow material (DESCRIBE SOURCE AND ATTACH SAMPLING PROFILE): Soil source
will be a quarry (not another Brownfield Site); the specific quarry will be identified by the selected
excavation contractor and sampled to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards. (Site metals
background data is provided in the attachment “Site-Specific Background Metals Data”).NCDEQ will
be notified of the selected quarry and provided sample results prior to placing backfill in excavations.

MANAGING ONSITE SOIL

1) If soil in known or suspected areas of contamination is anticipated to be excavated from the
Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields Property,or otherwise disturbed during site
grading or other redevelopment activities, please provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates
areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are acceptable, if only preliminary data
available).

2) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION – Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the
North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35? ☐ Yes ☒ No

If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes generating the
waste( include pertinent analytical results as needed). Click here to enter text.

If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained-Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the North Carolina
Contained-In Policy? ☐ Yes ☐ No

NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS THE
CONTAINED-OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA CONTAINED-IN POLICY THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR
HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

3) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION – Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?:
☒ Yes ☐ No
If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).

☐ Ignitability
☐ Corrosivity
☐ Reactivity
☐ Toxicity
☐ TCLP results
☒ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual hazardous
constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory TCLP standard)

If no, explain rationale: Click here to enter text.

6
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE SOIL MAY NOT
BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DENR HAZARDOUS WASTE
SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.

4) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
☐ Preliminary Health-Based Residential SRGs Click here to enter a date.
☒ Preliminary Health-Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs 10/1/2016
☐ Site-specific risk-based cleanup level, or acceptable concentrations determined via
calculated cumulative risk. Enter details of methods used for determination/explanation:
Click here to enter text.

5) Check the following action(s) to be taken during excavation and management of said soils:

☒ Manage fugitive dust from site:
☒ Yes ☐ No
If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale: BMPs, including spraying soils with water to
minimize dust, will be followed during excavation and management of excavated soils. The excavation
contractor will take into account wind speed, direction, and moisture content during the activities of
excavation, stockpiling, and loading for offsite disposal.

☒ Field Screening:
☒ Yes ☐ No
If yes, describe method; If no, explain rationale: Health and safety monitoring for VOCs using
a PID and particulate monitoring at the Site perimeter by the Environmental Consultant, who will also
observe soils to identify staining, odors, debris or other indications of contamination and verify that
all impacted soil is removed.

☒ Soil Sample Collection:
☒ Yes ☐ No
If yes, describe method (e.g., in-situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.); If no, explain rationale:
Confirmation grab samples will be collected in each excavation from sidewalls (4 samples) and floor (1
sample) (personnel will not enter excavations to collect samples; a grab sample will be collected from
an excavation bucket containing soil from each sidewall and from the excavation floor) and analyzed
fro VOCs to confirm soil exceeding cleanup criteria have been removed. In addition, 1 composite
sample from each disposal rolloff and analyzed for TCLP VOCs to characterize the soil for disposal.
☒ Stockpile impacted soil in accordance with NCDENR IHSB protocol in the current version of
the “Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup”, and providing erosion control, prohibiting
contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing
contaminated runoff. Explain any variances:
Click here to enter text.
☒ Analyze potentially impacted soil for the following chemical analytes:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
7
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury,
lead, selenium and silver)
☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel,
selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)
☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
☐ Other Constituent(s) & Analytical Method(s): Click here to enter text.

☐ Proposed Measures to Obtain Pre-Approval for Reuse of Impacted Soil within the
Brownfields Property Boundary
☐ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
☐ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on
site map to Brownfields Project Manager once known
☐ Use geotextile to mark depth of fill material (provide description of material)
☐ Manage soil under impervious cap ☐ or clean fill ☐
Describe cap or fill: Click here to enter text. (provide location diagram)
☐ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-
recorded if actions are Post-Recordation).
☐ Other: Click here to enter text.

☐ Final grade sampling of exposed soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or permanent
hardscape): [if not checked provide rationale for not needing]
Provide diagram of soil sampling locations, number of samples, and denote Chemical
Analytical Program with check boxes below (Check all that apply):
☐ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☐ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☐ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium (speciated), mercury,
lead, selenium and silver)
☐ Metals –Hazardous Substance List -14 (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium (speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel,
selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc)
☐ Metals – EPA Priority Pollutant List – 13 (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium
(speciated according to IHSB protocol), copper, mercury, nickel, lead, antimony, selenium, silver,
thallium, and zinc)
☐ Pesticides
☐ PCBs
☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method: Samples will not be collected from final
grade because confirmation samples will be collected to verify all soil exceeding cleanup criteria has
been removed from the excavations and then backfill (which has been sampled to verify it meets
acceptable standards and is considered clean for use) will be placed in the excavation areas up to final
grade.
OFFSITE TRANSPORT & DISPOSITION OF EXCAVATED SOIL
NOTE: Unless soil will be transported offsite for disposal in a permitted facility under applicable
regulations, no contaminated or potentially contaminated soil may leave the site without approval
8
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
from the brownfields program. Failure to obtain approval may violate a brownfields agreement,
endangering liability protections and making said action subject to enforcement. Justifications
provided below must be approved by the Program in writing prior to completing transport activities.
☒ Transport and dispose of impacted soil offsite (documentation of final disposition must be sent to
Brownfields Project Manager)
☒ Landfill – analytical program determined by landfill
☐ Landfarm or other treatment facility Click here to enter text.
☐ Use as Beneficial Fill Offsite – provide justification: Click here to enter text.
☐ Use as Beneficial Fill at another Suitable Brownfields Site – (Note: a determination that a
site is a “Suitable Brownfields” site will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same
or similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil as beneficial soil will not
increase the potential for risk to human health and the environment at that site, and that notarized
documentation of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of the receiving site is
provided to Brownfields. Provide justification: Click here to enter text.

MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)

☐ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were
removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth from
which it was excavated.

☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, and/or
degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants? Result: Yes □ No □
If no, include rationale here. Click here to enter text.
If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches: It is not anticipated that any
utility trenches will be encountered in the planned Parcel I (309 West Crowell Street and 316 West
Jefferson Street) excavation areas, which includes removal of impacted soil and replacement with
clean backfill.

PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below and attach figure showing
distribution of groundwater contaminants at site

What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property? 7-15 ft bgs (Parcel I); 13-25 feet bgs
(Parcel II); 17-31 feet bgs (E-J Property)

Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☒onsite ☐ offsite ☐ both ☐ or unknown
sources? Describe source(s): Former Hazardous Waste Storage Areas, Former AST(s) and site
activities during operation of the Scott and Enquirer-Journal facilities

9
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property? North to Northwest

Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, describe these activities: Click here to enter text.

In the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if
no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of
groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary
sewer, or sampling procedures): Allow groundwater to re-infiltrate for approximately 24 hours before
dewatering groundwater from excavations or foundations. Containerize the groundwater, collect
sample(s) and analyze for VOCs using EPA Method 8260 for use in developing a profile for proper
offsite disposal.

PART 3. SURFACE WATER – Please fill out the information below.
Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.

Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No

Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒ No

In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities, or
clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of such events (e.g.
flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts): Prevent rain water run off from
entering the excavation by setting up barriers to divert flow and covering excavated material.
Containerize any surface water that comes in contact with excavated material. Collect sample(s) of
containerized surface water and analyze for VOCs using EPA Method 8260 for use in developing a
profile for proper offsite disposal.

PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below.
Is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No

Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒ No

If yes, attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.

In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance): No surface water on the
property.

PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below.
Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following
10
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
vapor intrusion screening levels in the following media:

IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
Groundwater: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
Groundwater: ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown

Attach a map showing the location of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site screening levels.

If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated? Unknown

Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown

In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities (trenches,
manways, basements or other subsurface work, list activities for management of such contact: If
contaminated soil vapors are encountered, DEQ will be notified. The area will be evacuated and
appropriate safety screening of vapors will be performed. If results indicate further action is
warranted, appropriate engineering controls, such as use of a fan and/or personal protective
equipment will be implemented. In addition, the potential need for building vapor mitigation will be
considered at that time.

PART 6. SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR -please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.

Are sub-slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown

If data indicate that sub-slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing
the location of these exceedances.

At what depth(s) is sub-slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☐ 0-6 inches ☐ Other, If other
describe: Click here to enter text.

Will workers encounter contaminated sub-slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown

In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact: Remove personnel from the area of contaminated soil
vapor and allow the vapors to disperse, as determined by PID monitoring.

11
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below .
Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
If yes, attach a map showing the location where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk-based screening levels will not
be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated indoor air
during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact: Indoor air only exists within the former Enquirer-Journal
building (no other buildings exist on the Brownfields Property, only building slabs remain), which is
not being remediated under this initial EMP. If future work is conducted within that building,
personnel would be removed from any area in which indoor air is found to contain a contaminant of
concern at a concentration in excess of its OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit, until ventilation or other
measures, and/or the use of personal protective equipment, have been employed to protect
remediation workers from such exposures.
PART 8 – Vapor Mitigation System – Please fill out the information below .
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
If yes, provide the date the plan was submitted to the Brownfields Program.
Note: A vapor mitigation plan may be included in a future version of this EMP, if and when the
City of Monroe proposes use of the former Enquire-Journal building (502 W Crowell Street) or the
construction of a building on Parcel I (309 West Crowell Street and 316 West Jefferson Street) or
Parcel II (310 W Crowell Street).
Attach the plan.
Has the vapor mitigation plan been approved by the NC Brownfields Program?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
Has the vapor mitigation plan been signed and sealed by a North Carolina professional engineer?
☐ Yes ☐ No
What are the components of the vapor intrusion mitigation system?
☐ Sub-slab depressurization system
☐ Sub-membrane depressurization system
☐ Block-wall depressurization system
☐ Drain tile depressurization system
☐ Passive mitigation methods
☐ Vapor barriers
Perforated piping vented to exterior
O Other method: Click here to enter text.
PART 9. CONTINGENCY FOR ENCOUNTERING UNKNOWN TANKS, DRUMS,OR OTHER WASTE
MATERIALS
Please provide a contingency plan in the event unknown tanks,drums,fuel lines, landfills, or other
waste materials are encountered during site activities.
Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth-moving activities at
the site:
Review of historic maps(Sanborn Maps,facility maps)
Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST,fuel lines, utility lines,etc.
Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
Notification to State Brownfields Project Manager,UST Section,Fire Department,and/or other
officials,as necessary and appropriate,is required when new potential source(s)of contamination are
discovered. See Notification Section on Page 1 for notification requirements.
II POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
In accordance with the site's Brownfield Agreement, provide a report within the designated schedule
to the State Brownfields Project Manager.
Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a redevelopment summary report in compliance
with the site's Brownfields Agreement.
APPROVAL SIGNATURES
2. 5 2fit ?
Pros• -ctive Developer Date
Printed Name/Title/Company
111/K62iLI:V—t 2;312013
12
EMP Form ver.1,October 23,2014
E.L. Faison, City of Monroe
City Manager
Consultant Date
Printed Na'!!!iflitle/Company
tv'\ ~ 1~~ / P(l)_jd-M.~:yr / (\ Eco,AI\ l/25/7-0\ B
Date
~;J,,r \ ~\; r.r\1·J1
i't>ro\lJv'\:Q~ fru)e.J-M~~
13
EMP Form ver.1, October 23, 2014
Backup for “Contaminated Media”

Tabulated Data Summaries
(Groundwater, Vapor Intrusion, and Soil)
and Figures

09042-05-090/Scott Aviation
1
Exhibit 2
The most recent environmental sampling at the Property reported in the Environmental Reports occurred
on December 2016. The following tables set forth, for contaminants present at the Property above unrestricted
use standards or screening level found at each sample location, and the applicable standard or screening level.
Groundwater tables include both the maximum and the most recent concentration. Screening levels for
groundwater and soil standards are shown for reference only and are not set forth as cleanup levels for purposes
of this Agreement.
GROUNDWATER
Groundwater contaminants in micrograms per liter (the equivalent of parts per billion), the standards for
which are contained in Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2L (2L), Rule .0202,
(April 1, 2013 version):
Groundwater
Contaminant
Standard
(µg/L)
Sample
Location
Maximum Concentration Most Recent Concentration
Date of
Sampling
Concentration
(µg/L)
Date of
Sampling
Concentration
(µg/L)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 MW-2 1/31/2014 2,050 3/8/2016 1,640
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 MW-3 1/31/2014 837 3/7/2016 504
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 P3 5/19/2003 230 5/19/2003 230
1,1-Dichloroethylene 350 MW-2
1/31/14,
3/8/16 19,000 3/8/2016 19,000
1,1-Dichloroethylene 350 MW-3 1/31/2014 16,800 3/7/2016 13,000
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 MW-2 1/31/2014 386 3/8/2016 367
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 MW-3 1/31/2014 124 3/7/2016 98.8
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.4 P-4 3/8/2016 0.44 3/8/2016 0.44
Antimony 1 MW-1 1/27/2014 2.7 1/27/2014 2.7
Antimony 1 MW-2 1/31/2014 6.1 1/31/2014 6.1
Antimony 1 MW-3 1/31/2014 3.3 1/31/2014 3.3
Arsenic 10 MW-7 2/4/2014 17.9 2/4/2014 17.9
Benzene 1 W-2A 1/28/2014 19.3 1/28/2014 19.3
Bromodichloromethane 0.6 MW-7 2/4/2014 3.4 2/4/2014 3.4
Chloroform 70 MW-2 1/31/2014 235 1/31/2014 235
Chloroform 70 MW-3 1/31/2014 83.2 1/31/2014 83.2
Chromium 10 MW-7 2/4/2014 39.9 2/4/2014 39.9
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 70 MW-1 2/21/2003 1,800 3/7/2016 975
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 70 MW-3 1/31/2014 118 3/7/2016 63.6
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 70 MW-4 3/8/2016 402 3/8/2016 402
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 70 MW-6 3/8/2016 1,080 3/8/2016 1,080
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 70 MW-7 3/8/2016 424 3/8/2016 424
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 70 P-4 3/8/2016 169 3/8/2016 169
Dibromochloromethane 0.4 MW-7 2/4/2014 0.71 2/4/2014 0.71
Lead 15 MW-7 2/4/2014 22.1 2/4/2014 22.1
Naphthalene 6 W-2A 1/28/2014 6 1/28/2014 6
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 MW-1 2/21/2003 2,000 3/7/2016 735
09042-05-090/Scott Aviation
2
Groundwater
Contaminant
Standard
(µg/L)
Sample
Location
Maximum Concentration Most Recent Concentration
Date of
Sampling
Concentration
(µg/L)
Date of
Sampling
Concentration
(µg/L)
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 MW-2 1/31/2014 59,300 3/8/2016 54,000
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 MW-3 3/7/2016 28,600 3/7/2016 28,600
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 MW-4 3/8/2016 314 3/8/2016 314
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 MW-5 3/9/2016 10.5 3/9/2016 10.5
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 MW-6 3/8/2016 1,560 3/8/2016 1,560
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 MW-7 3/8/2016 327 3/8/2016 327
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 MW-8 3/8/2016 167 3/8/2016 167
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 MW-10 3/8/2016 7.2 3/8/2016 7.2
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 MW-12 7/21/2016 115 7/21/2016 115
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 MW-14 7/21/2016 4.3 7/21/2016 4.3
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 P-1 2/21/2003 1,300 3/9/2016 534
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 P-2 2/21/2003 500 3/9/2016 197
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 P-3 5/19/2003 58,000 3/9/2016 19,900
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 P-4 3/8/2016 379 3/8/2016 379
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 P-5 1/28/2014 331 3/9/2016 43.1
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 P-6 9/18/2003 8,000 3/9/2016 6,420
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 W-2A 3/9/2016 1,380 3/9/2016 1,380
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 W-3A 2/21/2003 130 3/9/2016 104
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 W-5 11/10/2005 320 12/21/2016 188
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 W-6 11/10/2005 77 12/21/2016 <1
Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 W-7 11/10/2005 1.5 12/21/2016 0.53
Trichloroethylene 3 MW-1 3/7/2016 391 3/7/2016 391
Trichloroethylene 3 MW-2 3/8/2016 13,100 3/8/2016 13,100
Trichloroethylene 3 MW-3 1/31/2014 8,770 3/7/2016 7,110
Trichloroethylene 3 MW-4 3/8/2016 328 3/8/2016 328
Trichloroethylene 3 MW-6 3/8/2016 216 3/8/2016 216
Trichloroethylene 3 MW-7 3/8/2016 79.4 3/8/2016 79.4
Trichloroethylene 3 MW-8 3/8/2016 35.3 3/8/2016 35.3
Trichloroethylene 3 MW-12 7/21/2016 16.4 7/21/2016 16.4
Trichloroethylene 3 MW-14 7/21/2016 8 7/21/2016 8
Trichloroethylene 3 P-1 2/21/2003 42 3/9/2016 18.8
Trichloroethylene 3 P-2 2/21/2003 22 3/9/2016 8.7
Trichloroethylene 3 P-3 5/19/2003 2,200 3/9/2016 479
Trichloroethylene 3 P-4 3/8/2016 181 3/8/2016 181
Trichloroethylene 3 P-5 1/28/2014 82.5 3/9/2016 56.8
Trichloroethylene 3 P-6 3/9/2016 157 3/9/2016 157
Trichloroethylene 3 W-2A 1/28/2014 47.3 3/9/2016 38.9
Trichloroethylene 3 W-5 11/10/2005 22 12/21/2016 11
Vinyl chloride 0.03 MW-1 2/21/2003 9 3/7/2016 5.5
Vinyl chloride 0.03 MW-4 3/8/2016 3.2 3/8/2016 3.2
Vinyl chloride 0.03 MW-7 3/8/2016 9.1 3/8/2016 9.1
Vinyl chloride 0.03 MW-8 3/8/2016 0.98 3/8/2016 0.98
Vinyl chloride 0.03 MW-14 7/21/2016 1.2 7/21/2016 1.2
09042-05-090/Scott Aviation
3
Groundwater
Contaminant
Standard
(µg/L)
Sample
Location
Maximum Concentration Most Recent Concentration
Date of
Sampling
Concentration
(µg/L)
Date of
Sampling
Concentration
(µg/L)
Vinyl chloride 0.03 P-4 1/27/2014 9.9 3/8/2016 7.9
Vinyl chloride 0.03 P-5 1/28/2014 8.8 3/9/2016 6.4
GROUNDWATER VAPOR INTRUSION RISK
Groundwater contaminants with potential for vapor intrusion (VI) in micrograms per liter (the
equivalent of parts per billion), the vapor intrusion screening levels for which are derived from the Residential
Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels of the Division of Waste Management October 2016 version):
Groundwater
Contaminant with
Potential for Vapor
Intrusion
Sample
Location
Date of
Sampling
Concentration
Exceeding the
Screening Level
(µg/L)
Commercial VI
Screening Level(1)
(µg/L)
1,1-Dichloroethene MW-2 3/8/2016 19,000 164
1,1-Dichloroethene MW-3 3/7/2016 13,000 164
1,1-Dichloroethene P-6 3/9/2016 263 164
1,2-Dichloroethane MW-2 3/8/2016 367 97.8
1,2-Dichloroethane MW-3 3/7/2016 98.8 97.8
1,2-Dichloroethane P-3 3/9/2016 < 100 97.8
Tetrachloroethene MW-1 3/7/2016 735 48.4
Tetrachloroethene MW-2 3/8/2016 54,000 48.4
Tetrachloroethene MW-3 3/7/2016 28,600 48.4
Tetrachloroethene MW-4 3/8/2016 314 48.4
Tetrachloroethene MW-6 3/8/2016 1,560 48.4
Tetrachloroethene MW-7 3/8/2016 327 48.4
Tetrachloroethene MW-8 3/8/2016 167 48.4
Tetrachloroethene MW-12 7/21/2016 115 48.4
Tetrachloroethene P-1 3/9/2016 534 48.4
Tetrachloroethene P-2 3/9/2016 197 48.4
Tetrachloroethene P-3 3/9/2016 19,900 48.4
Tetrachloroethene P-4 3/8/2016 379 48.4
Tetrachloroethene P-6 3/9/2016 6,420 48.4
Tetrachloroethene W-2A 3/9/2016 1,380 48.4
Tetrachloroethene W-3A 3/9/2016 104 48.4
Tetrachloroethene W-5 12/21/2016 188 48.4
Trichloroethene MW-1 3/7/2016 391 4.35
Trichloroethene MW-2 3/8/2016 13,100 4.35
Trichloroethene MW-3 3/7/2016 7,110 4.35
Trichloroethene MW-4 3/8/2016 328 4.35
Trichloroethene MW-6 3/8/2016 216 4.35
Trichloroethene MW-7 3/8/2016 79.4 4.35
09042-05-090/Scott Aviation
4
Groundwater
Contaminant with
Potential for Vapor
Intrusion
Sample
Location
Date of
Sampling
Concentration
Exceeding the
Screening Level
(µg/L)
Commercial VI
Screening Level(1)
(µg/L)
Trichloroethene MW-8 3/8/2016 35.3 4.35
Trichloroethene MW-12 7/21/2016 16.4 4.35
Trichloroethene MW-14 7/21/2016 8 4.35
Trichloroethene P-1 3/9/2016 18.8 4.35
Trichloroethene P-2 3/9/2016 8.7 4.35
Trichloroethene P-3 3/9/2016 479 4.35
Trichloroethene P-4 3/8/2016 181 4.35
Trichloroethene P-5 3/9/2016 56.8 4.35
Trichloroethene P-6 3/9/2016 157 4.35
Trichloroethene W-2A 3/9/2016 38.9 4.35
Trichloroethene W-5 12/21/2016 11 4.35
Vinyl chloride MW-2 3/8/2016 < 400 24.5
Vinyl chloride MW-3 3/7/2016 < 200 24.5
Vinyl chloride P-3 3/9/2016 < 100 24.5
1 Screening levels displayed for non-carcinogens are for a hazard quotient equal to 0.2. Screening levels displayed for
carcinogens are for a 1.0E-5 lifetime incremental cancer risk.2 NS – Screening level or regulatory not established.
09042-05-090/Scott Aviation
5
SOIL
Soil contaminants in milligrams per kilogram (the equivalent of parts per million), the screening levels
for which are derived from the Preliminary Industrial Health- Based Soil Remediation Goals of the Inactive
Hazardous Sites Branch of DEQ’s Superfund Section (October 2016 version):
Soil
Contaminant
Sample
Location
Date of
Sampling
Concentration
Exceeding
Standard (mg/kg)
Standard(1)
(mg/kg)
Tetrachloroethylene GP-07SB-07 9/15/2003 1,100 78
Tetrachloroethylene GP-15-4 6/24/2004 540 78
Tetrachloroethylene GP-20-7 6/25/2004 300 78
Tetrachloroethylene SB03a-I-8'1/21/2014 1,200 78
Tetrachloroethylene SB06c-S-2'1/21/2014 243 78
Tetrachloroethylene SB17-I-8'1/24/2014 781 78
Tetrachloroethylene SB27-I-6'01/30/2014 85 78
Trichloroethylene GP-20-7 6/25/2004 12 3.8
Trichloroethylene SB11-D-12'1/24/2014 8.89 3.8
Trichloroethylene SB27-I-6'01/30/2014 6.38 3.8
1Screening levels displayed for non-carcinogens are for a hazard quotient equal to 0.2. Screening levels displayed for
carcinogens are for a 1.0E-6 lifetime incremental cancer risk.
2.Arsenic was detected on the Brownfields Property at concentrations ranging from 3.1 mg/kg to 16.3 mg/kg. The impacts
are widespread across the property with no source point. Arsenic is considered naturally occurring on the Brownfields
Property.
Backup for CONTAMINATED MEDIA
PART 1 SOIL
Soil Detailed Site Plans
PARCEL I SOIL REMEDIATION
SITE MAP - GENERAL PROJECT LOCATION
NOT TO SCALE
FORMER SCOTT AVIATION SITE
309 WEST CROWELL STREET MONROE, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT INFORMATION
OWNER/CLIENT SCOTT FIGGIE LLC
OWNER/CLIENT CONTACT INFORMATION STUART RIXMAN, [phone]
CLIENT ADDRESS 34407 DUPONT BOULEVARD, SUITE 6, FRANKFORD, DE 19945
FIRM LICENSE F-0342
SITE ADDRESS 309 WEST CROWELL STREET, MONROE, NC 28112
SITE OWNER CITY OF MONROE
SITE OWNER CONTACT INFORMATION RON MAHLE, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR [phone]
INDEX OF SHEETS
SHEET SHEET TITLE REVISION DATE
G-1 COVER SHEET B 9/20/2017
C-1 SITE LAYOUT AND EXCAVATION PLAN B 9/20/2017
C-2 ENLARGEMENT OF SITE LAYOUT AND EXCAVATION PLAN B 9/20/2017
C-3 EXCAVATION DETAILS B 9/20/2017
Last saved by: MELANIE.CALVO(2017-09-20) Last Plotted: 2017-09-20Filename: L:\PROJECTS\60284473\9.0 CADD\60284473_048 COVER SHEET.DWGMCCBCBREGISTRATION
CONSULTANT
CLIENT
PROJECT
PROJECT NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
SHEET NUMBER
AECOM Technical Services of North Carolina, Inc.
1600 Perimeter Park Drive
Suite 400
Morrisville, North Carolina 27560
60284473
FORMER SCOTT AVIATION SITE
PARCEL I SOIL REMEDIATION
SCOTT FIGGIE LLC
34407 DuPont Boulevard, Suite 6
Frankford, Delaware 19945
309 WEST CROWELL STREET
MONROE, NORTH CAROLINA
Do Not Use For Construction
DRAFT
COVER SHEET
G-1
I/R DATE DESCRIPTION
ISSUE/REVISION
A 9/8/2017 DRAFT FOR CLIENT
B 9/20/2017 ISSUED FOR STAKEHOLDER REVIEW
CROWELL ST.CHARLOTTE AVE.APPROXIMATE SITE
LOCATION.
SB40AREA B15' X 10' EXCAVATIONFMR. AST AREASEE SHEET C-2AREA A18' X 10' EXCAVATION FMR.HAZ.WASTE STORAGE AREASEE SHEET C-2CONCRETE RAMPWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEXXXXXXXXXXXX X X XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX XXXXCHARLOTTE AVE. CROWELL ST.CRAWFORD AVE.JEFFERSON ST.SOURCE:BASEMAP FROM DICKERSON ARCHITECTURE, PROJECT NUMBER 2007.OX, MAY 27, 2007.ABANDONED BOREHOLE LOCATIONSMONITORING WELL LOCATIONSEXISTING CONCRETE SLAB (BUILDING DEMOLISHED)SIDEWALKPROPERTY BOUNDARY (APPROXIMATE)EXISTING TEMPORARY FENCEWATER LINE (DASHED WHERE INFERRED)WATER VALVEOVER HEAD POWER LINEUTILITY POLEMANHOLEIRON PINLEGENDSB03WOHEXNOTES:1. ALL SURFACES ARE ASPHALT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.Last saved by: MELANIE.CALVO(2017-09-19) Last Plotted: 2017-09-20Filename: L:\PROJECTS\60284473\9.0 CADD\60284473_049 SITE LAYOUT AND EXCAVATION PLAN.DWG XX XX XX
REGISTRATIONCONSULTANTCLIENTPROJECTPROJECT NUMBERSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERAECOM Technical Services of North Carolina, Inc.1600 Perimeter Park DriveSuite 400Morrisville, North Carolina 2756060284473FORMER SCOTT AVIATION SITEPARCEL I SOIL REMEDIATIONSCOTT FIGGIE LLC34407 DuPont Boulevard, Suite 6Frankford, Delaware 19945309 WEST CROWELL STREETMONROE, NORTH CAROLINADo Not Use For ConstructionDRAFTSITE LAYOUT AND EXCAVATIONPLANC-1AREA SHOWNI/RDATEDESCRIPTIONISSUE/REVISIONA9/8/2017DRAFT FOR CLIENTB9/20/2017ISSUED FOR STAKEHOLDER REVIEW
SB40XXXXXXXXXXXXXBC-310'-0"15'-0"CONCRETE RAMPXXXXXXXAC-318'-0"10'-0"
CHARLOTTE AVE. CROWELL ST.CRAWFORD AVE.JEFFERSON ST.SOURCE:BASEMAP FROM DICKERSON ARCHITECTURE, PROJECT NUMBER 2007.OX, MAY 27, 2007.ABANDONED BOREHOLE LOCATIONSMONITORING WELL LOCATIONSEXISTING CONCRETE SLAB (BUILDING DEMOLISHED)SIDEWALKPROPERTY BOUNDARY (APPROXIMATE)EXISTING TEMPORARY FENCEUTILITY POLELEGENDSB03XNOTES:1. ALL SURFACES ARE ASPHALT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL LAYOUT WORK USING SCHEDULE OFMARKOUT DISTANCES SHOWN ON THIS SHEET.Last saved by: MELANIE.CALVO(2017-09-19) Last Plotted: 2017-09-20Filename: L:\PROJECTS\60284473\9.0 CADD\60284473_050 ENLARGEMENT OF SITE LAYOUT AND EXCAVATION PLAN.DWG MC CB CB
REGISTRATIONCONSULTANTCLIENTPROJECTPROJECT NUMBERSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERAECOM Technical Services of North Carolina, Inc.1600 Perimeter Park DriveSuite 400Morrisville, North Carolina 2756060284473FORMER SCOTT AVIATION SITEPARCEL I SOIL REMEDIATIONSCOTT FIGGIE LLC34407 DuPont Boulevard, Suite 6Frankford, Delaware 19945309 WEST CROWELL STREETMONROE, NORTH CAROLINADo Not Use For ConstructionDRAFTENLARGEMENT OFSITE LAYOUT AND EXCAVATIONPLANC-2SCHEDULE OF MARKOUT DISTANCESCORNER SB37 SB36 SB03b SB03 SB39 SB06 SB06b SB06d SB03a SB06cA1A2A3A410'-8"6'-4"12'-0"11'-2" 12'-2"13'-2"12'-4"18'-1"7'-10"16'-9"8'-5"14'-10"6'-5"7'-9"15'-4"7'-5"B1B2B3B45'-0"14'-4"14'-6"5'-5"7'-5"13'-10"13'-8"7'-1"AREAS SHOWNI/RDATE DESCRIPTIONISSUE/REVISIONA 9/8/2017 DRAFT FOR CLIENTB 9/20/2017ISSUED FOR STAKEHOLDER REVIEW
CROSS SECTION BBC-101C-103CROSS SECTION AAC-101C-103580585590595600605580585590595600605580585590595600575580585590595600575SB03a
SB37
SB03b10'-0"ELEV.FT. NAVD88ELEV.FT. NAVD88SB06bSB06c4'-0"PROPOSED EXCAVATIONNOTES:1. THIS DRAWING SHOWS PROPOSED EXCAVATION WORK TO REMOVE SOILS KNOWN TO BE IMPACTED WITH VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AT OR ABOVETHE HEALTH-BASED PRELIMINARY SOIL REMEDIATION GOAL (PSRG) FOR INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL LAND USE RECOMMENDED BY THE NORTH CAROLINADEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT, INACTIVE HAZARDOUS SITES BRANCH.2. EXCAVATION SIDEWALLS ARE NOT DESIGNED FOR PERSONNEL ENTRY INTO THE EXCAVATION. PERSONNEL SHALL NOT ENTER THE EXCAVATIONS AND ALLBARRICADES AND FENCING SHALL BE PROVIDED AS DESCRIBED IN THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.3. RECTANGLES BELOW SOIL BORINGS INDICATE SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS COLLECTED PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. SHADED RECTANGLES INDICATE THAT ATLEAST ONE COC CONCENTRATION IN THE SOIL SAMPLE WAS GREATER THAN 10 TIMES THE 40 CFR 268.48 UNIVERSAL TREATMENT STANDARD (UTS) AND ATLEAST ONE COC CONCENTRATION WAS GREATER THAN THE NCDEQ IHSB HEALTH BASED PSRG (INDUSTRIAL-COMMERCIAL). RECTANGLES THAT ARE DOUBLEHATCHED INDICATE THAT NO COC CONCENTRATION IN THE SOIL SAMPLE WAS GREATER THAN 10 TIMES THE UTS, BUT AT LEAST ONE COC HAD ACONCENTRATION GREATER THAN THE NCDEQ IHSB HEALTH BASED PSRG (INDUSTRIAL-COMMERCIAL). RECTANGLES THAT ARE SINGLE HATCHED DID NOT HAVEANY COC CONCENTRATION GREATER THAN 10 TIMES THE UTS OR GREATER THAN THE NCDEQ IHSB HEALTH BASED PSRG (INDUSTRIAL-COMMERCIAL), BUT DIDHAVE COC CONCENTRATIONS THAT WERE GREATER THAN THE PROTECTION-OF-GROUNDWATER (PoG) PSRG.4. EXCAVATED SOILS SHALL BE MANAGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.5. OVER EXCAVATION SHALL BE PROVIDED BASED ON CONFIRMATION SAMPLES AS DESCRIBED IN THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.6. FOUNDATION DETAILS ARE UNKNOWN. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL IMPACTED SOILS AS SHOWN. FOUNDATION DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL MAY BEREQUIRED AS PART OF THE PLANNED EXCAVATION OR NECESSARY OVER EXCAVATION. A FOUNDATION DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL STRATEGY SHALL BEDEVELOPED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO MOBILIZATION.7. ELEVATIONS WERE DETERMINED FROM FIGURE 4-1 OF THE 2016 ESA ADDENDUM .8. WATER TABLE ELEVATIONS ARE ESTIMATED BASED ON 3/7/16 GAUGING DATA IN MONITORING WELL MW-3 (AREA A) ABD MONITORING WELL MW-2 (AREA B).EXCEEDS 10 TIMES THE UNIVERSALTREATMENT STANDARD ANDINDUSTRIAL-COMMERCIAL (IC) PRELIMINARYSOIL REMEDIATION GOAL (PSRG)EXCEEDS IC PSRGEXCEEDS PROTECTION OF GROUNDWATER(PoG) PSRGLESS THAN ALL PSRGsLEGEND:PROPOSED EXCAVATIONFOR SITE CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN, UTS > IC PSRG >PoG PSRGBOXING INDICATES SOIL SAMPLE INTERVALSHADING INDICATES CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONSRELATIVE TO DEFINED REGULATORY STANDARSLast saved by: MELANIE.CALVO(2017-09-19) Last Plotted: 2017-09-20Filename: L:\PROJECTS\60284473\9.0 CADD\60284473_051 EXCAVATION DETAILS.DWG MC/ST CB CB
Do Not Use For ConstructionDRAFTEXCAVATION DETAILSC-3REGISTRATIONCONSULTANTCLIENTPROJECTPROJECT NUMBERSHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERAECOM Technical Services of North Carolina, Inc.1600 Perimeter Park DriveSuite 400Morrisville, North Carolina 2756060284473FORMER SCOTT AVIATION SITEPARCEL I SOIL REMEDIATIONSCOTT FIGGIE LLC34407 DuPont Boulevard, Suite 6Frankford, Delaware 19945309 WEST CROWELL STREETMONROE, NORTH CAROLINAI/RDATEDESCRIPTIONISSUE/REVISIONA9/8/2017DRAFT FOR CLIENTB9/20/2017ISSUED FOR STAKEHOLDER REVIEW
Backup for MANAGING ONSITE SOIL

Characteristically Hazardous Waste Analytical Results

Characteristically Hazardous Soil at Parcel I
Former Scott Aviation Facility
Monroe, North Carolina
Sample ID SB03a-I-8'SB06c-S-2'
Laboratory ID Protection 20X Rule 92187204026 92187356021
Date Collected of GW 01/21/14 01/21/14
VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B (µg/kg)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 640000 640000 1200 -<31300 <7550
1,1-Dichloroethene 46000 200000 45 14,000 <31300 <7550
1,2-Dichloroethane 460 2000 2 10,000 <31300 <7550
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 32000 460000 360 -<31300 <7550
Tetrachloroethene 16200 78000 5 14,000 1200000 243000
Trichloroethene 820 3800 18 10,000 <31300 <7550
Vinyl chloride 59 1700 0.19 4,000 <62500 <15100
Notes:
NCDENR PSRG - North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Preliminary Soil Remediation Goal (NCDENR*, April 2016).
Criteria for 1,3-dichloropropene used as surrogate values for cis- and trans-1,3-dichloropropene, propylbenzene used for n-propylbenzene, and
m-xylene used for m&p-xylenes.
VOC - Volatile Organic Compound
Red bold font and yellow shading indicates analyte exceeds 20 times TCLP regulatory limit in 40CFR 261.24 (toxicity characteristic).
Bold font and shading indicates the analyte was detected.
Bold outline indicates the concentration exceeds at least one of the PSRGs.
* NCDENR name has changed to North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ).
See Summary of Added Data Qualifiers for explanation of data qualifiers.
Residential Industrial
NCDENR PSRG
Page 1 of 1 September 2017
Characteristically Hazardous Soil at Parcel II
Former Scott Aviation Facility
Monroe, North Carolina
Sample ID NCDENR PSRG GP-07SB-07 GP-21-1 GP-21-6 SB16-S-2'SB16-I-4'SB17-I-8'
Laboratory ID Protection 20X Rule 810 FF25040-025 FF25040-026 92187661015 92187661016 92187661013
Date Collected of GW 09/15/03 06/25/04 06/25/04 01/24/14 01/24/14 01/24/14
VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B (µg/kg)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 640000 640000 1200 -<6 <270 <290 659 J//<1270 < 34200
1,1-Dichloroethene 46000 200000 45 14,000 <6 <270 <290 <1660 <1270 < 34200
1,2-Dichloroethane 460 2000 2 10,000 <6 <270 <290 <1660 <1270 < 34200
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 32000 460000 360 -<6 2200 5000 <1660 <1270 < 34200
Tetrachloroethene 16200 78000 5 14,000 1100000 R2//26000 20000 62400 48700 781000 /J/A
Trichloroethene 820 3800 18 10,000 <6 1100 2000 <1660 <1270 < 34200
Vinyl chloride 59 1700 0.19 4,000 <6 <540 <580 <3330 <2540 < 68400
Sample ID NCDENR PSRG GP-15-1 GP-15-4 GP-20-1 GP-20-7 SB27-I-6'SB28-I-6'
Laboratory ID Protection 20X Rule FF25040-004 FF25040-005 FF25040-021 FF25040-022 92188264017 92188264034
Date Collected of GW 06/24/04 06/24/04 06/25/04 06/25/04 01/30/14 01/31/14
VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B (µg/kg)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 640000 640000 1200 -<270 <260 <270 <270 <5000 <258
1,1-Dichloroethene 46000 200000 45 14,000 <270 <260 <270 <270 <5000 <258
1,2-Dichloroethane 460 2000 2 10,000 <270 <260 <270 <270 <5000 <258
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 32000 460000 360 -2500 6600 3500 16000 50200 110 J//
Tetrachloroethene 16200 78000 5 14,000 54000 540000 40000 300000 85000 16500
Trichloroethene 820 3800 18 10,000 2800 3700 1700 12000 6380 <258
Vinyl chloride 59 1700 0.19 4,000 <540 46 J <530 <540 <10000 <515
Notes:
NCDENR PSRG - North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Preliminary Soil Remediation Goal (NCDENR*, April 2016).
Criteria for 1,3-dichloropropene used as surrogate values for cis- and trans-1,3-dichloropropene, propylbenzene used for n-propylbenzene, and
m-xylene used for m&p-xylenes.
VOC - Volatile Organic Compound
Red bold font and yellow shading indicates analyte exceeds 20 times TCLP regulatory limit in 40CFR 261.24 (toxicity characteristic).
Bold font and gray shading indicates the analyte was detected.
Bold outline indicates the concentration exceeds at least one of the PSRGs.
* NCDENR name has changed to North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ).
See Summary of Added Data Qualifiers for explanation of data qualifiers.
Residential Industrial
Residential Industrial
Page 1 of 1 September 2017
Page 1 of 1 September 2017
Summary of Added Data Qualifiers
Former Scott Aviation Facility
Monroe, North Carolina
Modifier Description
<Indicates not detected at the reporting limit indicated.
“/”Separates the laboratory added data qualifiers from the validation data qualifiers. The
laboratory added data qualifiers precede the first “/”. The result qualifiers follow the first
“/”, and the analysis qualifiers follow the second “/”. The result qualifiers are a product of
the data validation process, and the analysis qualifier defines the type of QC excursion.
Laboratory Data Qualifiers
Qualifier Description
J Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the
adjusted reporting limit.
R2 The data used is from the diluted run due to the initial result exceeding the upper level of
calibration range.
Result Data Qualifiers
Qualifier Description
None
Analysis Data Qualifiers
Qualifier Description
A Percent difference between the primary and duplicate sample exceeded the established
criteria.
Backup for IMPORTED FILL SOIL

Site-Specific Background Metals Data
(from Environmental Site Assessment Report (AECOM, May 2014))

Appendix ISummary of Metals in Background Soil SamplesFormer Scott Aviation FacilityMonroe, North CarolinaBG-1-1-2' BG-3-1-2' BG-4-1-2' BG-6-1-2' BG-7-1-2' BG-8-1-2'02/04/14 02/04/14 02/04/14 02/04/14 02/04/14 02/04/1492188605004 92188605005 92188605006 92188605001 92188605002 92188605003Metals by EPA Methods 6010 and 7471 (mg/kg)Antimony < 0.51 < 0.55 < 0.56 < 0.5 < 0.55 < 0.48 0.5 1.1 0.6 0.0 0.6Arsenic 5.7 1.9 2.5 1.6 3.6 2.9 3.0 6.1 5.7 1.5 6.0Beryllium 0.53 0.57 0.27 0.39 0.43 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.6 0.1 0.7Cadmium 0.15 < 0.11 0.11 J// < 0.1 0.37 0.076 J// 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.4Chromium 35.8 15.9 12.2 17.7 19.5 16.1 19.5 39.1 35.8 8.3 36.2Copper 28.1 7.7 14.4 2.6 17.5 9.5 13.3 26.6 28.1 8.9 31.1Lead 23.5 49.5 57.3 9.7 39.9 35.8 36.0 71.9 57.3 17.3 70.6Mercury 0.008 0.034 0.072 0.012 M1// 0.056 0.12 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1Nickel 21.3 7.5 4.3 2.3 13.3 7.8 9.4 18.8 21.3 6.9 23.3Selenium < 1 < 1.1 < 1.1 < 1 < 1.1 < 0.95 1.0 2.1 1.1 0.1 1.2Silver 0.13 J// < 0.55 0.1 J// < 0.5 < 0.55 0.088 J// 0.3 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.8Thallium < 1 < 1.1 < 1.1 < 1 < 1.1 < 0.95 1.0 2.1 1.1 0.1 1.2Zinc 55.1 40.6 59.1 4.7 125 32.5 52.8 105.7 125.0 40.3 133.5Background StatisticsMean ConcentrationTwice the Mean Highest ValueStandard Deviation95th PercentilePage 1 of 1
Backup for INDOOR AIR

Indoor Air Sample Locations

Backup for PART 9

Contingency Plan

CONTINGENCY PLAN
IN THE EVENT UNKNOWN TANKS, DRUMS, OR OTHER WASTE MATERIALS ARE ENCOUNTERED

This contingency plan summarizes procedures to be followed in the event that unknown tanks, drums,
or other waste materials are discovered during the Parcel I Soil Remediation activities, which include
excavations in two previously characterized areas on Parcel I of the Former Scott Aviation Site located at
309 W. Crowell Street in Monroe, North Carolina.
In the event that a drum(s), tank(s), or other waste material is discovered during excavation activities,
the CONTRACTOR will immediately stop excavation activities, isolate the area, and notify the ENGINEER
(AECOM). The ENGINEER will be responsible for evaluating the potential health and safety and potential
environmental impact of the discovered material. Once the ENGINEER has determined a plan of action
for addressing the discovery, a Task Hazard Assessment (THA) will be conducted for that plan to identify
potential hazards and associated precautions to be taken to control the hazards. Any waste materials
removed from the Site will be characterized and disposed in accordance with applicable regulations.
In accordance with the accompanying Environmental Management Plan (EMP), NCDEQ will be notified
within 48 hours of the discovery.

LOCAL RESPONDERS
City of Monroe Police Department (located across Charlotte Avenue): 911 or [phone]
City of Monroe Fire Department (located across Charlotte Avenue): 911 or [phone]
Backup for PART 9

Historic Maps

10 Patewood Dr., Building 6, Suite 500 Greenville, SC 29615 T(864)234-3000 F(864)234-3069 www.aecom.com
September 1964
Appendix A - Historical Aerials
10 Patewood Dr., Building 6, Suite 500 Greenville, SC 29615 T(864)234-3000 F(864)234-3069 www.aecom.com
March 1969
Appendix A - Historical Aerials

10 Patewood Dr., Building 6, Suite 500 Greenville, SC 29615 T(864)234-3000 F(864)234-3069 www.aecom.com
March 1976
Appendix A - Historical Aerials

10 Patewood Dr., Building 6, Suite 500 Greenville, SC 29615 T(864)234-3000 F(864)234-3069 www.aecom.com
February 1993
Appendix A- Historical Aerials

10 Patewood Dr., Building 6, Suite 500 Greenville, SC 29615 T(864)234-3000 F(864)234-3069 www.aecom.com
March 1998
Appendix A - Historical Aerials

10 Patewood Dr., Building 6, Suite 500 Greenville, SC 29615 T(864)234-3000 F(864)234-3069 www.aecom.com
February 2010
Appendix A - Historical Aerials