Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCD980602163_19810630_Warren County PCB Landfill_SERB C_Exhibit B - Affidavit in Support-OCRIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PASTERN DISTRICT OP NORTH CAROLINA RALEIGH DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO . 79-560-CIV-5 EXHIBIT B \1J1\Rl~El\1 C(J l}l~'J..'Y, ~:,:Lo.i.ntiff, AFFIDAVIT OF BURLEY J3. MITCHELL, JR. IN SUPPORT OF STATE DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUM.1\1ARY JUDGMENT ON SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION STA~~ OF NOR~3 :ARCLINA, 0,-c_ E,J_. r BULLEY :::; _i·..:t~T-~>lELL, JR. f iri3t being duly sworn , deposes and l. I c·.:~1 SE~cret.ary of Crin-1e Control and Pu.blic Safety for the State of North Carolina and have held such office since 2 . Si~ce assuming this office I have had the respon- s.ibility of (:cordinating the response of all State agencies to th:::: p~~-c;bJc:,,i.c:; co.used by the dumping of PCB oil along the right-of-w2y or certain North Carolina highways . 3. A 0=a~t 3nvironmental Impact Statement (DEIS) ad- dressing the J=â–¡hlem was prepared and circulated in accor- dance vi~h a~pl\cable State regulations. 5. Al .2~ Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was prep2rcd an0 Iiled with the State Clearinghouse on November J.3, 19D0. Z\ ,:J:.l'--' of the FEIS is attached hereto as Attachment I. 6. The State inadvertently failed to attach to the FEIS 2. cop~· ,·:::: c..l1e comments :3ub~nitted by Warren County and faiJ.ed to prc~,7::_c:e th,3 State response to said comments . -; l\L /.ddendum to the FEIS (Addendum) was prepared which incluc.2.:0 cj1e comments submitted by Warren County and the State's ~2s~onse thereto. The Addendum was f iled with the State Cl22=inghouse on M2y 26, 1981 , in accordance with the procedur2: ~~?lica~le to the filing of final environmental " -2- J>.ttachrnent. iI. 8 . Suggestions for treatment of the soil liner with TSPP and for construction of 2 soil liner using a blend of montrnor~llinite and B-horizon clay were brought to my atten- tion by W. A. ~aney , Jr . in September of 1980, well after These suggestions were cE~:cussed by 1:,e ',·1ith the com,nittee preparing the EIS and were rejecteC ,, me as being a considerable expense which \·.'ould afford ':u commensurate protection to the environment . /} 1/ ~J/ /J ~I __ ;C ~ J) 'Burley B . i tchell, ,Jr . Sworn EL ·1d subsc~ ibed to before me 1981.