NCD991278953_20081212_National Starch & Chemical Corp._FRBCERCLA RD_OU-4 Remedial Design Work Plan - Preliminary Submitta-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ARCADIS
Infrastructure, environment, buildings
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan -Preliminary
Submittal
National Starch and Chemical
Company Superfund Site
Salisbury, Rowan County
North Carolina
December 12, 2008
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
Bruce D. Reilly, PE
Senior Engineer
Elizabeth Rhine
. Project Manager
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan -Preliminary
Submittal
National Starch Chemical and
Company Superfund Site
Salisbury, Rowan County, North
Carolina
Prepared for:
AkzoNobel SPG LLC
Prepared hy:
ARCADIS U.S., Inc.
30 Patewood Drive, Suite 155
Greenville, South Carolina
29615
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
Our Ref.
B0060013.0001
This document is intended only for the use
of the individual or entity for which it was
prepared and may contain information that
is privileged, confidential, and exempt from
disclosure under applicable law. Any
dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this document is strictly prohibited.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
1.0 Introduction
1-1 Facility Location
1-2 Historic Property Use and Ownership
1-3 General Site Layout
1-4 Results of Investigation
2.0 Planning and Deliverables
2-1 Submittals
2-2 Reports
3.0 Background
3-1 OU4 Record of Decision
3-2 Basis of Change from OU4 Record of Decision
3-3 Changes to the OU4 Record of Decision
4.0 OU4 Site Conceptual Model
4-1 Site Geology and Hydrogeology
4-2 OU4 Conceptual Model
5.0 Previous SVE Testing and Results
5-1 Soil Vapor Extraction Pilot Test-March 2008
5-2 Pilot Test Layout
5.2.1 Pilot Test Summary
5.2.2 Field Measurements
5.2.3 Air Emissions Sampling
5.2.4 Data Analysis
5-3 Soil Vapor Extraction Pilot Test -November 2008
5.3.1 Pilot Test Summary
5.3.2 Air Emissions Sampling
5.3.3 Data Analysis
5-4 Conclusions
Table of Contents
National Starch and Chemical
Company
Salisbury;North Carolina
1-1
1-1
1-1
1-2
1-2
2-1
2-1
2-1
3-1
3-1
3-2
3-4
4-1
· 4-1
4-2
5-1
5-1
5-1
5-1
5-2
5-2
5-2
5-3
5-3
5-3
5-4
5-4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
6.0 Remedial Design Approach
6-1 Wastewater Collection System Improvements
6-2 Physical Upgrades -Containment Structures and Floors
6-3 Installation of Transfer Piping
6-4 Road/Pad Replacement and Soil Removal
6-5 SVE System Installation
6-6 Air Injection System Installation
6-7 Interconnecting Piping
6-8 Off-Gas Treatment
6-9 Implementation Schedule
7.0 Post-Construction Activities
7-1 Certification of Completion
7-2 Remedial Action Report
7-3 · Operations, Maintenance and Monitoring
8.0 References
Table of Contents
National Starch and Chemical
Company .
Salisbury, North Carnlina .
6-1
6-1
6-2
6-2
6-2
6-4
6-5
6-6
6-6
6-7
7-1
7-1
7-1
7-1
8-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
Tables
Table I -March 2008 Pilot Summary of Data
Table 2-March 2008 Pilot Vapor Analytical Data Summary
Table 3 -November 2008 SVE Pilot Test Measured Pressure Data
Table 4 -November 2008 Pilot Vapor Analytical Summary
Figures
Figure I -Site Location
Figure 2 -Site Plan
Figure 3 -March 2008 Pilot Location
Figure 4 -November 2008 Pilot Vacuum vs. Time
Figure 5 -November 2008 Pilot PIO Readings vs. Time
Figure 6 -November 2008 Pilot Gas Laboratory Results vs. Time
Figure 7 -Road/Pad Excavation Limits
Figure 8 -SVE Well Flush Mount Cross-Section
Figure 9 -SVE Well Sub-surface Cross-Section
Figure IO -SVE/IAS Well Locations
Figure 11 -SVE/IAS Process Flow Diagram
Figure 12 -!AS Well Cross-Section
Appendices
Appendix A -Summary Monthly Progress Report December 2008
Appendix B -March 2008 Pilot Test Laboratory Reports on Gas Samples
Appendix C-November 2008 Pilot Test Laboratory Reports on Gas Samples
Appendix D -2008 Pilot Test Field Notes
Table of Contents
National Starch and Chemical
Company
Salisbury, North Carolina
iii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
Acronyms
AkzoNobel
bgs
coc
DNAPL
DCA
DPT
EPA
FSAP
HRS
HASP
!AS
in-Hg
111-WC
mg/m3
NPL
· NSCC
NCDENR
OU3
OU4
ppmv
PVC
ROD
RDWP
Site
SVE
scfm
sow
UAO
vc
AkzoNobel SPG LLC
Below ground surface
Contaminants of Concern
Dense non-aqueous phase liquid
1,2-dichloroethane
Direct-push technology
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Field Sampling and Analysis Plan
Hazard Ranking System
Health and Safety Plan
In-situ air sparging
Inches mercury
Inches water column
Milligrams per cubic meter
National Priorities List
National Starch and Chemical Company
Table of Contents
National Starch and Chemical
Company
Salisbury, Nort.h Carolina
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Operating Unit 3
Operating Unit 4
Parts per million by volume
Polyvinyl chloride
Record of Decision
Remedial Design Work Plan
National Starch and Chemical Company Superfond Site
Soil Vapor Extraction
Standard cubic feet per minute (70° F and I atmosphere)
Statement of Work
Unilateral Administrative Order
Vinyl chloride
iv
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
Acronyms
voes Volatile organic compounds
Table of Contents
National Starch and Chemical
Company
Salisbury, North Carolina•
V
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
:I
ii
.I
1.0 Introduction
" This Remedial Design Work Plan (RDWP) presents the preliminary design for ' implementing the remediation of Operating Unit 4 (OU4) of the National Starch and
' Chemical Company (NSCC) Superfund Site (Site) in Salisbury, Rowan County, North
Carolina. Implementation of the RDWP will ensure that remedial actions are
performed in accordance with United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
documents including the Unilateral Administrative Order (UAO), the Statement of
Work (SOW), the Record of Decision and amendments (ROD), and other
correspondence. The tasks specified in the UAO and ROD called for the installation of
a soil-vapor extraction (SVE) system; operation and maintenance of the SVE;
performance monitoring to determine remedial action effectiveness; and
: demobilization. This RDWP has been prepared in accordance with EPA guidance
· documents and references.
,1 1-1 Facility Location
, The Site is located in Salisbury, Rowan County, North Carolina at 485 Cedar Springs
, Road just½ mile northwest of the intersection of Cedar Springs Road and Main Street
: (United States Highway 29). This 465-acre tract of land includes the active chemical
plant (Figure I). Access to the Site is via a paved driveway and security·gate off of
,; Cedar Springs Road.
· 1-2 Historic Property Use and Ownership
1 Construction of the Cedar Springs Road Plant began in 1970 and included the
production facility and three wastewater lagoons located in the southeast portion of the
; site. The plant formerly produced textile-finishing chemicals and currently produces
i custom specialty chemicals. Chemical production takes place on a batch basis and
· varies depending on demand. Volatile. and semi-volatile ·chemicals are used in the ·
., manufacturing process, and acid and alkaline solutions are used in both the
1
; manufacturing and cleaning processes.
;, The Site was proposed for inclusion on the National Priorities List (NPL) in April
,. 1985, re-proposed in June 1988, and finalized on the list in October 1989 with a
: Hazardous Ranking System (HRS) score of 46.51. The HRS score was based on a
11 score of 80.46 for exposure via groundwater and a score of 0.00 for both exposure via
i! surface water and air. The Site was cataloged as Number 257 of the 1,249 Superltmd
· sites across the country on the NPL (USEPA, 1994a).
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury, North Carolina
1-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
AkzoNobel SPG LLC (AkzoNobel) purchased National Starch and Chemical
Company in 2008 and is the current Site manageL
1-3 General Site Layout
The OU4 area consists of the soils and paved areas at the north end of the Process
Building in Area 2 of the chemical plant, soils underneath this portion of the Building,
and soils underneath the lagoons adjacent to the employee parking lot. The topography
is generally flat with some drainage towards the northeast towards a perennial stream
which is identified as the Northeast Tributal)'. See Figure 2 for a detailed layout of the
Site showing the portion ofOU4 in the vicinity of the Process Building.
1-4 Results of Investigation
Two government agencies, the State of North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDENR) and EPA Region IV, have performed/overseen
investigations at the Site covering the environmental issues resulting from the former
operations at OU4. These investigations have included:
• Final Natural Degradation Treatability Study Work Plan for OU #4
(July 1996)
• Phase I Natural Degradation Treatability Study for OU #4 (March
1998)
• Final Report for the Evaluation of Natural Attenuation for OU #4
(August 1999)
• Phase II Natural Degradation Treatability Study Work Plan for OU #4·
(Januaiy 2000)
• Phase II Natural Degradation Treatability Study (NOTS) First Annual
Sampling Event Results (May 2002)
• Phase II Natural Degradation Treatability Study (NOTS) -Third
Annual Sampling Event Results (December 2004)
• Phase II Natural Degradation Treatability Study (NOTS) -Fourth
Annual Sampling Event Results (August 2005)
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury, .North Carolina
1-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
• Phase II Natural Degradation Treatability Study (NOTS) -Five Year
Monitoring Report for OU4 (April 2006) ·
• Final Second Superfund Five-Year Review Report (September 2007)
The UAO, SOW and ROD and amendments called for the remediation of the soils in
OU4 by either the use of bioremediation or SYE with off-gas control.
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury; North Carolina .
1-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
2.0 Planning and Deliverables
This section of the ROWP describes the required submittals of plans for the
remediation of OU4.
2-1 Submittals
The UAO and SOW require the submittal to and approval by the EPA for the following
plans prior to the remediation of the Site:
2-2
• Remedial Design Work Plans -preliminary design submittal (this
document), intermediate design submittal and final design
submittals;
• Field Sampling and Analysis Plan (FSAP) including Quality
Assurance Project Plan -submitted separately;
• Health and Safety/Contingency Plan (HASP)-submitted separately
(EPA review only);
• Operations and Maintenance and Monitoring Plan -submitted
separately
Reports
The UAO and SOW require periodic reports to be filed with the EPA as the project
moves forward. Monthly progress reports covering the ongoing activities will address
the following:
• Actions taken in the last 30 days;
• Results of any sampling or testing performed;
• List of submittals and work plans submitted in last month;
• Forecast of actions to be performed in next six weeks;
• Updated schedule in the form of either a Gantt or PERT clrn11;
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury, North Carolina·
2-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
• Modifications to work plans or schedules previously submitted; and,
• Actions taken to assist EPA with Community Relations.
The progress reports will be submitted to the EPA the fifth of each month. A summary
of 2008 activities is included with this work plan as Appendix A. Activities for prior
years are summarized in the annual reports.
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
. C.hemical Company
Salisbury, North Carolina
2-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
3.0 Background .
The OU4 ROD issued on October 6th, 1994 served to identify 1,2-dichloroethane
(DCA) impacted soil in the Production Area and location of the wastewater treatment
lagoons as a separate remedial operational unit, and create the OU4 designation. The
OU4 ROD identified natural attenuation as the preferred remediation alternative with
the provision to pursue Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) if natural attenuation did not
prove feasible. The ROD lists DCA as the only Contaminant of Concern (COC) in
OU4.
3-1 OU4 Record of Decision
The OU4 ROD called for a Natural Degradation Treatability Study (NOTS). The Phase
1 NOTS (1996-1998) included laboratory testing, installation of field plots for soil
sampling, and installation of soil gas monitoring wells for soil gas sampling. The Phase
II NOTS consisted of annual soil sampling to attempt to provide an estimated
degradation rate. At the conclusion of the Phase II NOTS (2001 -2006), it was
concluded that natural degradation of DCA is likely occurring at the Site; however
heterogeneities in subsurface conditions limit the ability to develop a defensible
degradation rate and the possible presence of isolated Dense Non-Aqueous Phase
-Liquid (DNAPL) pockets. The resulting long time-frame for DNAPL natural
attenuation is a compelling reason for not continuing the natural attenuation of the
soils in OU4.
The 2006 Phase II NOTS l'ivc Year Monitoring Report called for additional soil
investigation activities to delineate the horizontal extent of shallow impacts above the
OU4 ROD DCA Performance Standard (169 micrograms per kilogram) and re-
evaluate remedial options.
Previous soil investigation activities indicated shallow soil impacts in the following
three areas:
• the northwest corner of the Process Building near a door;
• beneath a former terracotta process sewer line, and;
• northeast corner of the Process Building near a former terra cotta
process sewer line.
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury, North Carolina
3-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
This investigation was conducted in March 2007. Investigation activities included
additional soil. sampling, in-situ waste characterization soil sampling to. evaluate
potential excavation remedial options, and a bench-scale treatability st,1dy to evaluate
potential in-situ chemical oxidation remedial options.
The results of this investigation and the evaluation of potential remedial alternatives
were presented in the OU4 Supplemental Feasibility Study (January 2008).
Considered alternatives included Gas Injection, Steam Injection, Soil Vapor Extraction,
and Thermal Treatment. All of the above were also considered with the addition of
pneumatic fracturing to increase effectiveness in the heterogeneous regolith, and with
Soil Vapor Extraction to aid in effectiveness and increase safety. The alternatives were
compared with respect to effectiveness, implementability (including constructability
and timing), and cost.
The resulting qualitative analysis concluded that Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) was the
preferred remediation alternative because it minimizes potential transfer from vadose
zone to saturated zone. SVE is the least complicated remedy that meets safety and
implementability constraints, such as minimal design time, process safety management,
and plant disruptions. The Supplemental Feasibility Study called for a pilot study
including four extraction wells and five observation wells, and the preparation of a
remedial design report and remedial action.
3-2 Basis of Change from OU4 Record of Decision
The 1994 OU4 ROD identified SVE using horizontal extraction wells as the
recommended remediation strategy in the event that natural attenuation was not
feasible, while the conclusion of the 2008 Supplemental OU4 Feasibility Study was
that vertical extraction wells were the preferred alternative. This change is based on the
following:
Heterogeneity in suhsurji,ce co11ditions could lead to scifety issues if horizontal drilli11g
was used.
The geology of the Site includes the presence of underlying high-
angle fractured, metamorphic bedrock which has weathered in place to
produce an overlying regolith of fully weathered saprolite and a
partially-weathered transition zone. The fully weathered saprolite is
characterized as a clay material overlying the partinlly-weathered
transition zone. The partially weathered transition zone has particle
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
· Chemical Company
Salisbury, North Carolina
3-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
sizes ranging from clay to boulder, dependent on the degree of
weathering. The degree of weathering is a function of parent material
characteristics and location. relative to water transmitting· fractures.
Thus, subsurface conditions are generally heterogeneous. If relatively
harder boulders are encountered during drilling, the drill bit may
deviate ("walk") from the intended path by following a path of lesser
resistance through smaller grain-sized material. Based on the presence
of process equipment, raw material tanks, final product storage, and
critical utilities (e.g., electrical or gas lines) in the vicinity of the
proposed SVE systems, horizontal drilling presents hazards to worker
safety and the environment.
Results of OU4 NDTS indicate mass r!f COCs less widespread than the Remedial
Investigation reported.
The Remedial Investigation for OU4 presented results of soil
sampling. Presentation of results were carried forward into the ROD
for OU4 and were based on a site conceptual model that interpolated
concentration from a limited data set without consideration of
contaminant source, leading to the assumption of a large continuous
impacted zone beneath the OU4 area. As described in the next section,
additional sampling during the OU4 Phase II NOTS and subsequent
sampling events was based on a revised Site Conceptual Model based
on releases from former terra cotta process sewer lines and
appurtenances. The revised site conceptual model indicates that
impacts to soil are heterogeneously distributed in small zones adjacent
to former process sewers. Thus, the use of horizontal wells is not
warranted as the purpose was to access areas which are not directly
impacted.
Impact to groundwater J,-0111 OU4 soil is 111itigated through OU3 re111edy selection and
widespread impervious swfaces.
The OU4 remediation standard is based on protection of the
groundwater resource. The majority of the OU4 area underlies
impervious surfaces (i.e., buildings, paved parking lots, secondary
containment areas for tanks, and materials storage areas). Thus, the
potential impact to groundwater is mitigated by limited potential for
leaching. Further investigation and remedial design activities have
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury, North Carolina
3-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
3-3
identified the potential presence of DNA PL in the bedrock aquifer in
the vicinity of OU4. Impacts to groundwater are primarily related to
ongoing dissolution of DNAPL in the saturated zone and minimally
related to leaching from vadose zone impacts. Regardless, remedial
actions undertaken associated with OU3 (groundwater in the vicinity
of the plant) includes maintaining a capture zone inclusive of saturated
zone impacts.
Changes to the OU4 Record of Decision
Because of the points presented in §3.2, AkzoNobel has chosen to install a SYE with
vertical extraction wells augmented by an In-situ Air Venting system to accelerate the
remediation of soils in the OU4 area. A limited soil removal step will take place to
remove shallow soils under the existing concrete road/pad that exists to the north and
west of the Process Building during installation of the SVE system. Potential and
possible source areas will be addressed by taking actions such as the placement of
chemically compatible grouts and sealants to repair impacted damaged concrete floors
and sumps, and the rerouting of wastewater directly to collection and transfer sumps.
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury, North Carolina
3-4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
4.0 OU4 Site Conceptual Model
A conceptual model has been developed and presented in previous documents for the
Site (BBL, 2000). The following sections will present site information and data as it
relates to soil in OU4.
4-1 Site Geology and Hydrogeology
The Site lies within the Charlotte belt of the central Piedmont physiographic province
which is generally characterized by relatively thick regolith over fractured igneous
and metamorphosed igneous and sedimentmy bedrock. The land surface in the
Piedmont is underlain by clay-rich, unconsolidated material derived from in-situ
weathering of the underlying bedrock. The unconsolidated material, which· averages
between about 30 and 60 feet thick and may be as thick as 300 feet in some areas, is
referred to as saprolite, which retains the relic texture and structure of the parent
bedrock. In the valleys of many larger streams, the flood plains are underlain by
relatively thin, moderately well sorted alluvium deposited by the streams (Heath,
I 984). A transition zone between saprolite and competent bedrock comprised of
saprolite (thoroughly weathered rock), partially weathered rock, and competent rock
fragments to boulders is typical in the Piedmont. The transition zone represents a
zone of greater weathering than the competent bedrock, but lesser weathering than
the saprolite. The top of the transition zone in this geologic setting is typically
identified as being at or near auger refusal.
The topography of the Piedmont consists of low, rounded hills and long, rolling,
generally northeast-southwest trending ridges whose summits ranges from about 300
feet above Mean Sea Level (MSL) along its eastern boundary with the Coastal Plain
province to about 1,600 feet above MSL along its boundary with the Blue Ridge
province to the west (Heath, 1984). In general, the top of competent bedrock in this
terrain is a subdued reflection ofthc land surface topography.
The conceptual model of groundwater flow in the Piedmont includes groundwater
compartments centered on streams with boundaries at, or near, the topographic highs,
which define the boundaries of the watershed. Two slope-aquifer systems comprise
each groundwater compartment. The entirety of the Piedmont hydrogcologic system
is a collection of numerous groundwater compartments of varying size (Daniel et.al.,
1997).
Groundwater within these compartments enters the system as recharge from
precipitation and exits as surface water flow from the stream. Within the
groundwater system, the groundwater percolates through the thin topsoil into the
underlying saprolite, where it may flow horizontally and discharge to the stream or
flow vertically into the underlying transition zone. In the transition zone,
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury, North Carolina
4-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
groundwater may flow horizontally and discharge to a stream or flow vertically into
the underlying fractured bedrock or up into the saprolite, depending on vertical
hydraulic gradients. Groundwater which flows vertically into the bedrock· will
eventually flow upwards into a stream. Under non-pumping condition, it is very rare
for groundwater to underflow perennial streams or drainage divides and now into
other slope-aquifer systems (LeGrand, 1989).
The saprolite and transition zone (which together comprise the regolith) collectively
act as the storage zone for groundwater. The bedrock generally has very low primary
porosity and therefore does not act as an important storage zone (Harned, 1989).
More groundwater flow occurs in the transition zone than in the saprolite. This is due
to differences in conductivity and effective porosity. The saprolite is more fully
weathered to fine materials than the transition zone (Harned & Daniel, 1989).
Groundwater flow in the fractured bedrock is through secondary porosity, which is
primarily in the form of vertical or high angle fractures.
4-2 OU4 Conceptual Model
DCA impacts in OU3 groundwater have been attributed to wastewaters migrating
through the vadose zone to the groundwater from the former terra cotta process
sewers and the previously unlined wastewater treatment lagoons (IT, 1993). These
potential sources of impacts no longer exist. The underground terra cotta sewers have
been removed and replaced with aboveground piping and the wastewater treatment
lagoons have been lined with concrete.
Any conceptual model created for the OU4 soil impacts must be integrated with a
conceptual model related to the impacted groundwater. in OU3. The conceptual
model for impacts in OU3 and OU4 is summarized as follows:
The geology of the Site includes the presence of an underlying
high-angle fractured, metamorphic bedrock which has weathered
in place to produce an overlying regolith of fully weathered
saprol ite and a partially weathered transition zone as described
previously. The overlying regolith retains the parent material
structure.
The underlying aquifer is potentially impacted by a zone of
residual DNAPL, which is the result of historic leaks from tcrra
colla pipes in the Plant Area as well as the formerly unlined
wastewater treatment lagoons. Due to the geologic structure, the
DNAPL may be in residual form within the bedrock and may form
a source of impacts to groundwater for an indefinite period of time.
To address these impacts, a pump and treat system exercises
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury, North Carolina :
4-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
hydraulic control over the dissolved phase impacts (which also
encompasses the entirety ofOU4).
Soil impacts observed in OU4 are residual impacts associated with
the OU3 groundwater issues. Thus, the impacts are primarily
observed in the vicinity of the former terracotta pipes (Area 2 and
former storm sewers located adjacent to Area 2), with higher
concentrations likely observed in the vicinity of relict high-angle
fractures. Some observed impacts may represent immobile ganglia
of residual DNAPL bound up within relict high-angle fractures.
There exists a potential for the presence of a dense non-aqueous
phase liquid at the Site based on the following observations:
-Concentrations of DCA, which in its free phase is more dense
than water, exceed I% of its aqueous solubility in some of the
on-site wells; and,
-Concentrations of DCA have been detected in deep wells in
areas which exhibit an upward hydraulic gradient, indicating
gravity-driven flow.
Although both of the above observations were made in the groundwater at the site, it
is possible that DCA migrated through the vadose zone as a DNAPL and is present at
residual concentrations in the soil at the site.
The nature and extent of soil impacts presented in the RI and used
throughout the Natural Degradation Treatability Study may not
accurately represent the actual conditions. This is primarily due to
the graphic representation of data from multiple soil horizons in a
single concentration isopleth map.
Under current conditions, the ROD for OU4 states that there are no
unacceptable risks for direct contact with impacted·soil at the Site.
Furthermore, the goal of the remedial action is to prevent the
continued release of constituents to groundwater from impacted
soil. However, the potential presence of DNA PL in the underlying
aquifer presents a morC constant and higher strength source of
impacts to groundwater than the residual material in the soil. The
purpose of the OU3 groundwater extraction system is to establish
hydraulic control over the dissolved phase impacts including those
impacts observed in the vicinity of the soil in OU4.
Therefore, impacted soil does not pose a substantial or unmanaged risk.
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical. Company
Salisbury, North Carolina
4-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADlS
5.0 Previous SVE Testing and Results
· 1n accordance with the published OU4 ROD, soil vapor extraction (SVE) has· been··
selected for use in OU4. The SYE technology was successfully pilot tested at the site
as documented below.
5-1 Soil Vapor Extraction Pilot Test -March 2008
On March 27, 2008, ARCADIS conducted SVE pilot testing at the referenced site.
This test was conducted to assess the viability of the SYE technology at the Site and
to collect initial engineering design information.
5-2 Pilot Test Layout
On March 6, 2008, ARCADIS oversaw the installation of one vertical vapor
extraction well (YEW-I), and three vapor monitoring points (VM-1 through YM-3).
YEW-I was installed to 20 feet below ground surface (bgs) using 8.25-inch hollow-
stem augers and is constructed with 4-inch diameter, Schedule 40 PVC pipe having
IO feet of 0.020-inch slotted screen and IO feet of solid riser. The vapor monitoring
points were installed using 4.25-inch hollow-stem augers and constructed to 20 ft bgs
with 2-inch diameter Schedule 40 PVC pipe. VM-1 and VM-3 are constructed with
15 feet of 0.020-inch slotted screen and 5 feet of solid riser and VM-2 is constructed
with 10 ft of0.020-inch slotted screen and 10 ft of solid riser.
All of these wells were installed in a gravel covered, unpaved area. Due to the
absence of an impervious surface seal in the pilot study area, a screen interval of I 0
to 20 ft bgs was chosen for YEW-I to ieduce the possibility of drawing vapors from
the surface and "short-circuiting" the subsurface recovery. The pilot test well layout
is shown on Figure 3.
5.2.1 Pilot Test Summary
The SVE pilot test was conducted by incrementally applying a set vacuum at the
source well and then measuring various field parameters. Measured parameters
included gas llow rate, pilot-test vacuum, and applied vacuum to the soils as a
function of distance from the source well. Three steps of applied vacuum were
tested: 66, 94, and 130 inches of water column (in we). Alier completion of the
testing using YEW-I as the source well, the pilot test was repeated using VM-2 and
VM-3 as source wells using the same applied vacuum settings.
The pilot test equipment used included a skid-mounted, 2-horsepower, pos1t1ve-
displacement blower capable of28 standard cubic feet per minute (scfm) at IO inches
of mercury (in-Hg). A ball valve on the blower dilution line was used to control the
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbu.ry, North Carolin.a·
5-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
applied wellhead vacuum. Exhaust gas flow rates were determined by using the in-
line flow meter which was included with the test equipment. Gas samples were
collected at the inlet of the pilot test blower upstream of the inlet of the dilution
airflow. · · ·
Vacuum influence measurements were collected from the monitoring points using
Magnehelic® gauges which measured well to atmosphere differential pressure. The
vacuum influence measurements were collected at I 0-minute intervals until readings
stabilized for a maximum period of35 minutes.
5.2.2 Field Measurements
Results of the field data collection were tabulated in the field notebook,..for later
analysis. The field notes from this pilot test can be found in Appendix,Z:-vAnalysis
of the vacuum influence indicated the expected hydraulic connectivity between the
various source wells and measured wells with the notable exception of YM-2.
Measured influence included values of-10 in wc at 4.7-feet and -8.0 in wc at 12.5-
feet from the source well. Complete field measurements from this pilot test can be
found on Table I.
5.2.3 Air Emissions Sampling
Two air samples were collected during the pilot test and sent to TestAmerica
Laboratories (TestAmerica), Knoxville, Tennessee for laboratory analysis of volatile
organic compounds (YOCs) by EPA Method TO-I 5. An influent vapor sample was
collected from YEW-I prior to completion of the third step of Test I or
approximately 95-minutes into the test. An influent vapor sample was almollected
from YM-3 at the completion of Test 3 to evaluate influent concentratio,f~different
screened interval (5 to 20 ft versus IO to 20 ft bgs). The YEW-I exhaust gas sample
contained a DCA concentration of 13,000 parts per million volume (ppmv) and a
vinyl chloride (YC) concentration of 230 ppmv. The YM-3 exhaust gas sample
contained a DCA concenfration of 32,000 ppinv and a YC concentration of 280
ppmv. The concentrations correspond to DCA and YC mass emission rates of 53,029
milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) and 593 mg/m3, respectfully, in YEW-I, and
DCA and YC concentrations of 130,533 mg/m3 and 721 mg/m3, respectfully, in YM-
3. A summary of the gas analysis data can be found in Table 2 and the complete
laboratory analytical is included in Appendixf.
JJ
5.2.4 Data Analysis
Data analysis of the field measurements and laboratory provided data was then
performed. From the field measurements the following was determined:
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury, .North Carolina.
5-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
• The source well flow rate was detennined to be a minimum of 25
scfm (pilot test equipment limited);
Increasing· . applied · vacuum results in increasing measured
influence vacuum as expected; and
Hydraulic connectivity between YEW-I and VM-2 appears to be
very poor.
From the laboratory provided analytical data, the following was determined:
5-3
Reported SVE exhaust gas concentrations were very high
(approaching SO-percent of the OCA lower explosion limit);
Vinyl chloride was detected in the exhaust gas as expected
indicating that dechlorination of the DCA continues to occur in the
OU4 soils; and
Based on the extraction rate of 25 scfm, total VOC recovery rates
of 120 pounds per day (lbs/d) and 294 lbs/d were calculated for
YEW-I and VM-3, respectively.
Soil Vapor Extraction Pilot Test -November 2008
After reviewing the emission sample analytical report and with consultation with
AkzoNobel, ARCAOIS performed a two-day SVE test using YEW-I as the vacuum
well. The test was performed on November 12-13, 2008 using a 25-scfm rotary-lobe
blower capable of producing 7.5-in-Hg vacuum. Similar in scope to the March 2008
test, well vacuums were measured from various perimeter wells around YEW-I
hourly during the test and gas samples collected for laboratory analysis using EPA
Method TO-I 5.
5.3.1 Pilot Test Summary
Well vacuum measurements were obtained from VM.-1 through VM-8. · (VM-4
through VM-8 were installed after the March 2008 pilot and are constructed similar
to the existing VM-3 well.) The measured vacuums were then plotted corresponding
to their distance from YEW-I and over the duration of the test. Table 3 presents the
measured pressure data and the plot is shown on Figure 4.
5.3.2 Air Emissions Sampling
SVE exhaust gas samples were collected for laboratory analysis at the one and 4-
hour ma·rks and every 4-hours thereafter. Every hour the exhaust gas was monitored
using a photo-ionization detector (PIO). The PIO readings peaked as expected
during the initial stages of the test and then decayed rapidly to a steady-state value of
60 parts per million. Laboratory gas samples were then shipped to Pace Laboratories
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury, North .Carolina · ·.
5-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
in Huntersville, North Carolina for analysis using EPA Method TO-15. Laboratory
analytical results indicated a peak concentration of DCA of 650 ppmv and a peak
· concentration of 7.7 ppmv VC. Table·4 presents the gas concentration lab data and
the plots of the Pl o· data and laboratory gas sample data versus time can be found on
Figures 5 and 6. Appendix Jii includes the laboratory test reports for the November
2008 pilot test gas samples. C,
Appendix D includes copies of the various field notes from both SVE pilot tests.
5.3.3 Data Analysis
Data analysis of the field measurements and laboratory provided data was then
performed. From the field measurements the following was determined:
•
The source well flow rate was determined to be a minimum of 25
scfm (pilot test equipment limited);
Reaching soil column "steady-state" conditions takes a minimum
of 44-hours as indicated by increasing influence vacuum levels;
Exhaust gas PID readings reach "steady-state" conditions within 5-
hours of start of the test;
Influence (vacuum compared to atmospheric pressure) was
measured out to 52-feet from the source well (-1.6 in we); and
Hydraulic connectivity between YEW-I and YM-2 does exist, but
takes a minimum of 24-hours before a measureable influence is
detected.
From the laboratory provided analytical data, the following was determined:
5-4
Reported SYE exhaust gas concentrations were more in-line with
experience than those reported for the March pilot test;
Exhaust gas quickly reached "steady-state" conditions in parallel
with the PID readings;
Vinyl chloride was again detected in the exhaust gas as expected
indicating that dechlorination of the DCA continues to occur in the
OU4 soils; and
Based Oil the extraction rate of 25 scfm, a total voe recovery rate
of 6.5 lbs/cl was calculated for YEW-I.
Conclusions
The minimum airflow rate of 25 scfm can be obtained from SYE
wells installed in OU4 area;
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Sali~bury, North. Carolina
5-4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
Vacuum influence increased as applied vacuum was increased;
Vacuum influence based on screen interval is inconclusive.
Vacuum.influence from VM-3, screened from 5 to 20 ft bgs, was
greater than vacuum influence from VM-2 but less than from
VEW-1, both screened from IO to 20 ft bgs;
• Measureable vacuum influence can be measured out to a distance
of 52-feet from the source well;
Hydraulic connectivity does exist between the source well and
VM-2, but needs 24-hours to reach "steady-state" conditions;
Exhaust gas concentrations reach "steady-state" conditions within
5-hours of start of testing;
The measured exhaust concentrations detected in March were not
repeated in the November test; and
SVE exhaust gas concentration decreases as a function of time as expected.
Analytical gas testing indicates that peak DCA and VC concentrations can be
estimated as 650 and 7.7 ppmv, respectively.
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury, North Carolina_
5-5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
6.0 Remedial Design Approach
This section presents the strategy and details for the remediation of the soils in the OU4
area. The strategy includes evaluations of sumps and trenches; physical upgrades to
containment structures and floors, the installation of transfer piping to route process
wastewater which includes DCA directly to the wastewater treatment plant system;
limited soil removal (up to 3 feet); the installation of the soil vapor extraction wells
along with air injection wells over the impacted area; the installation of combined SVE
and air delivery system; and the replacement of existing concrete pads and driveways
over the soil contamination in and around the Process Building.
6-1 Wastewater Collection System Improvements
AkzoNobel has identified two potential areas where releases to groundwater could
occur. These areas include:
Wastewater collection sump (Sump No. 2) and trench system
alongside and in the east-west truck delivery road north of the
Process Building; and,
Collection trenches inside the reactor section of the Process
Building.
In order to evaluate the integrity of the sumps and trenches and make improvements to
insure long-term use, the following corrective actions are proposed at this time.
Evaluation of the wastewater sump will include visual inspection of the structure and
repairs of areas as physical conditions warrant. The corrosion of the concrete structure
is a result of sulfuric acid stored in tote bins and drums in the area.
_In order to ensure integrity and long-term use of the collection. trenches; the following
activities arc proposed at this time. For the outside trench, a new trench will be
installed as the concrete road/pad is replaced. The trench materials of construction will
be selected to be compatible with the chemicals in use in the area. For the interior
trench, AkzoNobel will inspect and repair trench as the physical conditions warrant.
Inspection findings may require the use of alternative grouts1 coatings and/or sealants.
Complete documentation on the results of the inspections and corrective actions,
including photos and specifics on the products used, will be presented in the Remedial
Action Rcpo11 which will be completed a lier the first phase of construction.
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
. Salisbury, North Carolina
6-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
6-2 Physical Upgrades -Containment Structures and Floors
The ·site uses secondary containment structures extensively for the various process
vessels and storage tanks at the Site. AkzoNobel is going to take this opportunity
during the OU4 Remedial Action to evaluate and address any upgrades that are deemed
appropriate.
Physical upgrades are on-going at the site, as evidenced by sealants used in several
work areas within the Process Building. To insure long-term use of the containment
structures and floors, AkzoNobel will be ev~luating containment structures around the
Process Building area and repairing as necessary.
Inspection findings may require the use of alternative grouts, coatings m1d/or sealants.
Complete documentation on the results of the inspections and corrective actions,
including photos and specifics on the products used, will be presented in the Remedial
Action Report which will be completed after the first phase of construction.
6-3 Installation of Transfer Piping
This remedial action will include installation of permanent hard p1p111g from the
containment structures to Sump No. 2 using the existing overhead pipe racks.
Selection of pipe materials mid pumps will be made in accordance with good
engineering practices. Pipe connections, gaskets, fittings and supports will be installed
in accordance with industry practices. Pumps and electrical systems will be selected
and installed in accordance with industry and AkzoNobel criteria. Complete
documentation, incltiding photos and specifics on the products used, will be presented
in the Remedial Action Report which will be completed after the first phase of
construction.
6-4 Road/Pad Replacement and Soil Removal
The existing concrete road/pad adjacent to the Process Building will be replaced as part
of the overall OU4 system remediation (see Figure 7). This pad and road will be used
extensively for the routing of interconnecting piping between the various wells and
remediation system components and is the location of numerous SVE and air injection
wells. Additionally, the condition of the concrete in this area warrants replacement due
to cracks, settling and age.
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Sali.sbury·, North Carolina
6-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
During, the replacement, the existing surface water collection trench will be replaced
with a chemically compatible trench that will continue to be used to ·collect and gravity
drain spills and releases on the pad to the wastewater collection sump. The new pad
will be sloped to the trench and designed and constructed to collect any possible
releases from delivery trucks which regularly use the pad for bulk delivery of
chemicals to the facility.
After the removal of the ex,stmg concrete roadway, AkzoNobel will selectively
excavate soils underlying the removed concrete for off-site disposal. Soils will be
removed to depths not exceeding 3-feet and will be focused on areas where previous
investigations have identified high concentrations of DCA in the shallow soils. The
presence of existing utilities in the roadway soils will prevent the complete excavation
of these soils. Instead, where utilities are located, the soils around these utilities will be
left in-place to prevent the unattended disruption of facility operations. The estimated
total quantity of concrete and soils to be removed for off-site disposal is 3,500-cubic
yards. Removed materials will be stockpiled on-site for profiling which will be done
by collecting samples every 35 cubic yards of removed material and testing the
samples as required by the disposal facility.
Stockpiled soils and removed concrete will be stored on two layers of high-density
polyethylene sheeting and covered with. the same two layers of sheeting to prevent
impacts to the stockpile location. The stockpile location will be within the facility·
security area preventing unauthorized access to the stockpile, and will be located near
the wastewater treatment system. After the profiling analytical results ·are obtained,
AkzoNobel will transport and dispose of the removed soils and concrete in accordance
with federal and state regulations. It is expected that the removed soils and concrete
will be classified as non-hazardous after the profiling results are obtained. All
materials leaving the facility will be managed in accordance with regulations.
AkzoNobel will notify the listed personnel identified in the UAO of the pending
shipments after profiling and final selection of the off-site disposal location(s) is
completed. Our notification will include the estimated quantities of materials to be
disposed, location(s) of disposal points, shipping information including carrier(s) to be
used and tentative schedule, and letter(s) of acceptance of the m~terials to the disposal
location(s).
Backfilling of the excavated areas will be done with clean sand, gravel or crusher-run
dependent on in-place soil conditions, weather and/or field engineering judgment.
Samples will be collected of each backfill material and tested for the presence of the
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury, North Carolina
6-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' '
ARCADIS
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
·. Chemical Company
Salisbury, North c.arol.ina.
COC in accordance with the UAO and established analytical testing protocols. The
·backfill materials will be placed in accordance with the engineering design of the
concrete roadway/pad.
The new concrete road/pad will be placed in accordance with the engineering design
and specifications. It is expected that this concrete will be a "standard" mix of 3000-
psi compressive strength, but may be modified to account for weather conditions
during the time of placement. Compressive strength test cylinders will be collected
during the placement of the new concrete and subsequently tested to confirm the
placed concrete meets the specifications.
6-5 SVE System Installation
AkzoNobel will be installing a SVE system designed to remediate the soils in the
Process Building OU4 area. The system consists of approximately 48 vapor extraction
wells, a rotary-lobe extraction blower, zone control valves and various instruments to
monitor the system performance.
The extraction wells will be installed using hollow stem auger rotary drilling where
possible and direct push technology (DPT) with 4-inch tooling where access is
precluded. Most. wells will be constructed using 2-inch diameter Schedule 40 PVC
pipe and stainless steel well screen. A bentonite clay well seal will be placed above the
washed sand pack and topped with a minimum of I-foot of neat cement grout. Most
vacuum extraction wells will be finished below-grade and covered with a sealed, traffic
rated, checkered plate cover to allow for the placement of flow control valves and
instruments at the wellhead. Some of the wells (building interior) will be sealed to the
surface with neat cement grout to eliminate the potential of direct chemical contact
with the soils. For these wells, the piping connecting the well to the vacuum system
will be routed below the concrete floor slab to a location ·near a wall or building
column and then routed overhead to the vacuum extraction system. Flow control
valves and instruments for these wells will be placed aboveground. See Figures 8 and
9 for the cross-sections of the typical and sub-floor finished vacuum wells.
The location for the vacuum wells is a function of the already determined
contamination areas, site inte1ferences, and the desired goal or a maximum distance
between each well of 60-feet. Most vacuum wells will be drilled to a depth of 15-feet
below grade, have stainless steel wire-wrapped I 0-foot screen and a solid PVC pipe
riser. Vacuum wells installed near the groundwater interceptor trench and along the
stream are likely to be drilled to a field-determined depth which is expected to be less
6-4
. \
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
than 15-feet deep. See Figure IO for the layout of the proposed vacuum extraction
wells and the expected minimum effective radius of 30-feet and the known areas of
DCA soil impacts.
The mechanical system to provide the vacuum will include a rotary lobe blower
powered by a 30 horsepower motor. The blower/motor package will be capable of 435
standard cubic feet per minute (scfm) of airnow at a vacuum of 14-in-Hg. This flow
. rate corresponds to per well extraction now rate of25 scfm. The system will include a
moisture separator, vacuum relief valve and various instruments needed to monitor
performance. The extraction wells will be separated into three zones. The SVE system
will automatically switch the various zones based on elapsed time per zone. It is
expected that each SVE zone will operate 2 hours on followed by 4 hours off before
repeating the cycle. The system will operate 24-hours a day.
Figure 11 presents the process flow diagram for the SYE system.
6-6 Air Injection System Installation
In reviewing the SVE Pilot Test study results, AkzoNobel and ARCADIS have chosen
to enhance performance of the SYE system by adding an active venting/in-situ air
sparging system (IAS) to the remediatio,l;.Plan. The IAS will provide clean airflow to
the vadosc zone in most areas and groundwater and vadose zones in some areas
increasing the effectiveness of the SVE system. The IAS consists of approximately I 6
injection wells, a rotary screw air compressor, zon~ control valves, pressure regulators,
now indicators, manual valves, and other instruments to monitor and control system
performance.
The injection wells will be installed using hollow stem augers or DPT, depending on
accessibility. Wells will be constructed using 2-inch diameter Schedule 40 PVC pipe
and well screen. A bentonite clay well seal will be placed above the washed sand pack
and topped with a minimum of I-foot of neat cement grout. The IAS wells will be
finished below-grade and covered with a sealed checkered plate cover to allow for the
placement of flow control valves and instruments at the wellhead. See Figure 12 for
the cross-section of the typical IAS well.
The location for the IAS wells is a function of the already determined contamination
areas, site interferences, and the desired goal of a maximum distance between each
well of 80-fect. Most IAS wells will be drilled to auger refusal or a maximum of 30-
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury, North Carolina
6-5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
feet, have a 0.0 I 0-inch 5-foot screen and a solid PVC pipe riser. See Figure IO for the
layout of the proposed IAS wells.
The mechanical system to provide the compressed air will include a rotary screw air
compressor powered by a 15 horsepower motor. The blower/motor package will be
capable of 64 cubic feet per minute of free airflow at a discharge pressure of 125 psig.
This corresponds to an airflow per well of 7 scfm with two zones. The system will
include an air receiver, compressed air filters and regulators, zone control valves,
airflow rate indicators, manual valves and various instruments needed to monitor
performance. The IAS wells will be separated into two zones. The IAS system will
automatically switch the various zones based on elapsed time per zone and in
coordination with the SVE system. It is expected that each air sparge zone will operate
one hour on followed by one hour off before repeating the cycle. The system will
operate 24-hours a day.
Figures 11 present the process flow diagram for the IAS system.
6-7 Interconnecting Piping
The various SVE and IAS wells will be manifolded usmg either direct buried or
overhead .PVC piping or hose from the wells back to the remediation system location.
The piping will be Schedule 80 PVC pipe of the diameters shown on the figures. Air
supply hose will be used to deliver compressed air to the IAS wells from the
remediation system. Because of the zones in use for each of the systems, multiple
manifolds will be installed. Manifold pipe diameters have been selected in accordance
with good engineering practice to minimize pressure drop. Joints in the manifold will
be solvent weld type in accordance with standard practices. Isolation valves will be
ball valves with seats and seals selected to be chemically compatible with DCA.
Manifold piping buried will be backfilled with sand and tracer tape placed in the trench
to allow for the locating of the manifold in the future. Overhead piping will be
supported in accordance with standard practices using the existing or new pipe racks.
Overhead piping will be labeled in accordance with facility standard labeling practices.
6-8 Off-Gas Treatment
Ort~gas from the SVE system will initially be highly concentrated containing up to 650
ppmv of DCA along with lesser concentrations of other chemicals previously detected
at the Site. AkzoNobcl and ARCA DIS are in the process of reviewing alternatives for
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and .
· Chemical Company
Salisbury; North Carnlina
6-6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
the treatment of the SVE off-gas. Three potential alternatives for treatment have been
identified:
Condensation and off-site recovery of the DCA and water using a
licensed contractor;
On-site treatment of the off-gas using an existing thermal oxidizer
and scrubber system located in the adjacent Henkel facility; or
On-site treatment of the off-gas using either a new thermal oxidizer
and scrubber or relocating the groundwater treatment system's off-
gas thermal unit.
AkzoNobel and ARCADIS will notify the EPA and NCDENR when this review is
completed and we will provide the technical infonnation to support the decision and
details on the path forwards in processing the off-gas.
6-9 Implementation Schedule
The sequence of the work is critical to cost-effectiveness of the project and to minimize
impact on facility production. A. detailed schedule will be submitted in January once
logistics are worked out with plant operations. To sum1iiarize, the schedule is as
follows (in sequence of activity):
•
•
SVE and IAS well installation -duration five weeks
Transfer piping installation -duration five weeks
Roadway/Pad removal/soil excavation/replacement -to be
completed in 3 phases for a total duration 23 weeks
Possible source area upgrades -duration 16 weeks
Potential source upgrades -duration 19 weeks
SVE and !AS system design/procure/fabricate/install
(building/equipment only)-duration 38 weeks
System startup and full-time service -duration 2 weeks
From the schedule, the installation of the remediation is scheduled to be completed by
September 2009. This compares to the December 2009 completion date last forecasted
to the EPA in the Second Five Year Review Report published in September 2007.
Progress on the implementation of the remedial action will be transmitted to the EPA
and NCDENR as required in the monthly progress reports. Should the implementation
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury, North Carolina
6-7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
schedule require modification, AkzoNobel will uotify the EPA and NCDENR of the
change in writing, including the reasons/justification.
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury, North Carolina ·
6-8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
7.0 Post-Construction Activities
AkzoNobel will implement a series of activities after completion of the remedial action
construction. These actions include submitting a Certificate of Completion to the EPA;
preparation and submittal of the Remedial Action Report to the EPA; and the
preparation and implementation of the Operations, Maintenance and Monitoring plan
called for in the UAO.
7-1 Certification of Completion
AkzoNobel will submit written notice to the EPA and NCDENR of completion of the
construction of the remedial action for OU4 in accordance with the UAO. Within 30
days of receipt of the certification, the EPA, NCDENR, AkzoNobel and ARCADIS or
their representatives will tour the facility to review the construction. AkzoNobel will
review any deficiencies identified by the EPA and NCDENR and take action to correct
these issues should action be required.
7-2 Remedial Action Report
AkzoNobel will prepare and submit to EPA and NCDENR the Remedial Action
Report to document the corrective actions completed under this RDWP.
Documentation will include photographs of prior and after corrective action on the
potential and possible source areas; photographs of the well installation activities;
analytical test results on the removed soils and placed backfill for the soil excavation;
results of compliance testing on the concrete installed in the roadway/pad areas;
specifications on the installed grouts and sealants if a change is needed due to field
conditions; and startup test results for the SVE and IAS systems.
The Remedial Action Report will be delivered to the EPA and NCDENR 111
accordance with the schedule shown in UAO.
7-3 Operations, Maintenance and Monitoring
AkzoNobel and ARCADIS will prepare and issue the Operations, Maintenance and
Monitoring Plan for the installed SVE/IAS system. The plan is expected to include
daily monitoring of system operations, logging of operational information and
inspection activities. Monitoring of the system will include weekly SYE gas sampling
using photo or flame-ionization detector, monthly SVE gas sampling for specific
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
· Salisbury,' North Carolina
7-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
analysis by a laboratory for OCA and VC concentrations, monthly mass emission
calculations.
Maintenance of the system will be added to the regularly scheduled facility
maintenance calendar. The maintenance schedule will be developed per the specific
vendor recommendations, but is expected to be similar to the following:
Weekly inspections of system mechanical components including
liquid separator volume, relief valve functionality, adjustment of air
pressure regulators, compressor and vacuum blower oil levels; and
Semi-annual servicing of blower and compressor and functional
checkout of all automated controls and instruments.
The completed plan will be submitted to the EPA for review during the final phases of
construction of the remedial action.
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
Chemical Company
Salisbury, North Carnlina
7-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
11
I
I
I
ARCADIS
8.0 References
Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. 1998. Site Conceptual Model. Prepared for National
Starch & Chemical Company, Cedar Springs Road Plant Site, Salisbury, North
Carolina (March 1998).
Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. 1999. Remedy Evaluation Plan for Operable Unit One.
Prepared for National Starch & Chemical Company, Cedar Springs Road Plant Site,
Salisbury, North Carolina (June 1999).
Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. 1999. Response to Comments, Remedy Evaluation
Plan,Operable Unit One. Prepared for National Starch & Chemical Company, Cedar
Springs Plant Site, Salisbury, North Carolina (October 18, 1999).
Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. 2000. Remedy Evaluation Report for Operable Unit One.
Prepared for National Starch & Chemical Company, Cedar Springs Plant Site,
Salisbury, North Carolina (November 2000).
Blas land, Bouck & Lee, Inc. 2002. Fracture Trace Analysis. Prepared for National
Starch & Chemical Company, Cedar Springs Road Plant Site, Salisbury, North
Carolina (July 2002).
Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. 2003. Overburden Trenching and Fracture Mapping.
Prepared for National Starch & Chemical Company, Cedar Springs Plant Site,
Salisbury, North Carolina (March 13, 2003).
Colog, 2003. HydroPhysical and Geophysical Logging Results, National Starch,
Salisbury, NC. Prepared for Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. (September 22, 2003).
C Tech. 2006. Mining Visualization System User Manual. Kaneohe: C Tech
Development Corporation (March 15, 2006).
Envirogen. 1998. Phase I Natural Degradation Treatability Study for Operable Unit 4,
Cedar Springs Road Plant, Salisbury, North Carolina.
US EPA. 1994a. Record of Decision for Operable Unit# 4 at the National Starch &
Chemical Company. September 1994.
OU4 Remedial Design
Work Plan
National Starch and
· Chemical Company
Salisb.ury, North Carolina
8-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 1 -MARCH 2008 PILOT SUMMARY OF DATA
National Starch and Chemical
Cedar Road Plant
Salisbury, North Carolina
Test 1 • VEW-1 (1 O' -20') Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
Time 8:55 -9:30 9:31 -10:00 10:03 -10:30
~. · .. IE.·,·rf·.w.1·.o·.· .. ·w· .. ·.1 ... · .. ·Rw ... ·.·•.·.e.c.1.o1.h.v•.• .. •.'Y.d ... Rv .. aatceu_fur.mo ... m.l'.'wv····e9w) .. :1···-(s··c·-f·m···)·. -.............•.............. ·•···· 66 94 ..... ····· . 130
Al . ::_24: _ ......... if .......... __ 25 ..
Observation Well Readlnas
Distance from Vacuum Influence ("wg)
Well No.
Screen
Interval
(feet bis)
Well
Diameter
(Inches) VEW-1 (feet) I--S-te_p_1_~--S-te_p_2_~--S-te_p_3_-II
VM,L
VM-2 vrvi:3
5 -20
10 -20 .. ··-·········-·· 5-20
2
2 .. . ·2
Test 2 -VM-2 (1 O' -20') ................. .-.Time·• .... •----............. ·
~~,~ Wellhead v.ac:~urnj~v,g)_.
_ irflov, Re.cov,ary R.~te from VM-2 (s_c(rrl) ···-
..
4.7
8.0
12.5 '"'"' . ""
·····-·-·····-·····-··
............. ·····-..
······-··
I Observation Well Readings
Screen Well Distance from
Well No. Interval (feet Diameter VM-2 semen
bis) (feet) (feel)
VM-3 5 -20 2 7.2
VEW-1 10 -20 4 8.0 ... ..
VM-1 -···--· .. ...... 86 ····-···· 5 -20 2
Test 3 -VM-3 (5' -20') ·····················-·· ··· 11m·e ·· ....... ·
Observation Well Readinns
Screen Well Distance from
Well No. Interval (feet Diameter VM•3 screen
bis) (feet) (feet)
"M-2 10 • 20 2 7.2 iif,ij:j 5 -20 2 10.0 iiEw:, ·· ·······'"········-·--···· 10 -20 4 12.5
8.o 1 o.o ........ 1~,.o
0.00 , 0.00 . .,. 0.00
4.9 8.0 1 o:o
Step 1
10:40-11:10
130 ····-··· 25
Vacuum
Influence
(ln-wg)
Stec 1
2.4
0.1
2.0
St~p 1.
11:20-12:15
130
25
Vacuum
Influence
(in-wg)
Stec 1
0.1
5.6
0.07
I
-------------------------------
Compound
1,2 -Dichloroethane
Vinvl Chloride
Total voes
Notes:
SVE -soil vapor extraction
mg/m3 -milligrams per cubic meter
VOCs -volatile organic compounds
TABLE 2
MARCH 2008 PILOT VAPOR ANAL YTCAL DATA SUMMARY
ppb
13,000,000
230,000
National Starch and Chemical
Cedar Road Plant
Salisbury, North Carolina
VEW-1 (10' -20')
Va, or Flow Rate = 25 scfm
mg/m' lbs/day
53,029 119
593 1.3
53,621 120
ppb
32,000,000
280,000
G:\ENV\National Starch\SVE Pilot Study\Pilot Test Data_Mar 27.xls.xls
VM-3 (5' -20')
Vapor Flow Rate = 25 scfm
mg/m0 '"""'" ;h,J,
130,533 293 I
721 1.6
131,254 294
scfm -standard cubic feet per minute
lbs/day -pounds per day
ppb -parts per billion by volume
Page 1 of 1
I
I
I
I SVE Blower
Elapsed nme Hrs In Hg Temp
I 1.00 7.5 148
2.25 7.5 148
3.00 7.5 140
4.00 7.5 135
I 4.75 7.5 134
5.50 7.5 132
6.50 7.5 131
7.25 7.5 132
8.00 7.5 134
I 9.00 7.5 132
9.75 7.5 134
10.50 7.5 134
11.50 7.5 134
I 12.25 7.S 125
13.00 7.0 125
14.00 7.0 128
15.00 7.0 128
16.00 7.0 128
I 17.00 7.0 128
18.00 7.0 126
19.00 7.5 126
20.00 7.5 126
I 21.00 7.5 128
22.00 7.5 128
23.00 7.5 128
24.00 7.5 126
25,00 7,6 128
I 26,00 7,6 136
27.00 7.5 136
28.00 7.5 138
29.00 7.5 138
I 30.00 7.5 138
31.00 7.6 138
32.00 7.6 136
33.00 7.6 136
~ 34.00 7.7 138
I 35.00 7.6 136
36.00 7,7 138
38.00 7,7 136
39.00 7,7 136
I 40.00 7.7 136
41.00 7,7 138
42.00 7,7 138
43.00 7.6 136
44.00 7.7 136
I 45.00 7.7 136
I
I
I
I
TABLE 3 • NOVEMBER 2008 PILOT SUMMARY OF DATA
PIO
106
90
75
68
60
63
65
59
58
58
59
60
77
75
63
58
66
60
60
69
65
67
71
71
73
77
80
78
68
69
75
72
83
80
90
83
74
73
72
83
83
83
82
80
81
80
National Starch and Chemical
Cedar Road Plant
Salisbury. North Carolina
VMCJ VM-=-I VMC,
(4.7' from (7.8' from (12.5'from
VEW-1) VEW-1) VEW-1)
VM·4 ,..,.,
(52' from (42.6' from
VEW-1) VEW-1)
Vacuum Readings (In H20)
6.2 0 7.8 0.4 0
5.1 ' 5.2 0.6 0
4.7 0 3.7 0.6 0
3.3 0 2.4 0.4 0
3.0 0 1.2 0.1 0
2.6 () 2.1 0.3 0
2.2 () 1.2
0.2 0
2.4 0 1.7 0.2 0
2.4
0 l,8 0.2 0
2.6 0.0 1.5 0.2 0
3.0
0 2.0 0.2 0.0
2.8 0
l,4 0.2 0.2
3
0 1.8 0.2 0.6
3.l 0
2.6 0.2 0
3.2
1.6 2.4
0.6 0.4
3.8 2.2
2.9 1 1
4.2
4 3.4 1.4
1.2
4,6 3.2
3.4 1.2 1.2
4.6
1 3.2 1.2
1.2
4,6 2.2
3.8 1.6 1.6
5.2
v,vj•t) ... ,., ......
(15.3' from (19.9' from 132.l' from
VEW-1) VEW-1) VEW-1)
2.6 0.2 0
3.1 0.2 0
0.1 0.4 0
0.2 0.1 0
0 0.1 0
0.1 0 0
0.2 0 0
0 0 o.
0.1
0 0
0.2 0 0
1.0
o.o 0.2
0.2 0
0
0.4
0 0
0.4 0
0
1.1
0.6 0.2
1.8 0.2
0.6
2.1
1.4 0.9
2 1,4
0.8
2
0.2 0.4
2.4 1.9
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 4 -NOVEMBER 2008 PILOT GAS ANALYTICAL DATA.
SVE Blower
Elapsed Time Hrs in Hg
1.00 7.5
2.25 7.5
3.00 7.5
4.00 7.5
4.75 7.5
5.50 7.5
6.50 7.5
7.25 7.5
8.00 7.5
9.00 7.5
9.75 7.5
10.50 7.5
11.50 7.5
12.25 7.5
13.00 7.0
14.00 7.0
15.00 7.0
16.00 7.0
17.00 7.0
18.00 7.0
19.00 7.5
20.00 7.5
21.00 7.5
22.00 7.5
23.00 7.5
24.00 7.5
25.00 7.6
26.00 7.6
27.00 7.5
28.00 7.5
29.00 7.5
30.00 7.5
31.00 7.6
32.00 7.6
33.00 7.6
34.00 7.7
35.00 7.6
36.00 7.7
37.00 7.6
38.00 7.7
39.00 7.7
40.00 7.7
41.00 7.7
42.00 7.7
43.00 7.6
44.00 7.7
45.00 7.7
National Starch and Chemical
Cedar Road Plant
Salisbury, North Carolina
Exhaust Gas Analytical Results
DCA vc 'TVOC
Temp PID Parts per million volume
148 106 650 7.7 658
148 90
140 75
135 68 170 2.6 182
134 60
132 63
132 65
132 59
134 58 200 3.3 203
132 58
134 59
134 60
134 77
125 75 270 4.6 279
125 63
128 58
128 66
128 60 81 1.4 99
128 60
126 69
126 65
126 67 230 3.9 234
128 71
128 71
128 73
126 77 260 4.4 264
128 80
136 78
136 68
138 69 260 4.8 274
138 75
138 72
138 83
136 80 240 4.3 244
136 90
138 83
136 74
138 73 250 4.1 254
138 73
136 72
136 83
136 83 240 4.0 252
138 83
138 82
136 80
136 81 260 4.4 264
136 80
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I VJ ..J ~
:! '>-z
I a: >-VJ 5'0:: ,-C -u ~'"' I .? ~ ~I ,;.c zU .i'J
I ~I ii
I ~--i ;:::
0
... :-r·
.• .. · ".:
/l
,....(
I
/ .
/ .
0
., .. ·----; ~ ~ ={,_ X Cl1y0,t"' /
SOURCES: ROWAN MILLS, CHINA GROVE, NORTH CAROLINA 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE CONTOUR INTERVAL= 10 FEET
2000' 0 2000'
Approximate Scale: 1" = 2000'
Area Location
~
NORTH CAROLINA
NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
2007 SITE MONITORING REPORT
SITE LOCATION MAP
ARCADIS FIGURE
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SG-1 0P-01-T
I
I
I
I
a: I ....
~ ....
~ 0.
I i..i 0:
0 _J
m 0
I
I
0 NS-25-T
0NS-22-T
♦EX-03-8
0N5-01A-S
NS-01-5
0JNS-15-T
,..NS-1O-5 ., ♦ex.oa-T
0N9-02-S
NS-16-T NS-07-S ~ ♦EX-1O-T
NS.a-8 0NS-11-S
-41-T NS-
NS-4~ ~S,-T
~T0 NS-54-B
0N5-SJ.T . . ~
Sample Locations
♦ Extraction Well, Bedrock
♦ Extraction Well, Transition
0 Monitoring Well, Bedrock
0 Monitoring Well, Saprolite
0 Monitoring Well, Transition ...
' ... Surface Water
•
•
Sediment
Stream Gauge
Railroads
Streams
NATIONAL STARCH CHECMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE MAP
ARCADIS FIGURE
2
-- - -- - -- - --- -- - -- -
Figure 4
November 2008 Pilot -Vacuum Readings vs. Time
9...-----------------------------------------------
s +-----------------------------------------------
7 +--1-----------------------------------------------
~ 6 +--\-lf---------------------------------------------n,
3
C
:.:. 5 +---~----------------------------------------c.,._ ____ _ Ill)
C
"1::1 n, ~ 4 -l---4+---------------------~~::....:....---_________________ _
E :::, 3 3 i--.~+~,__ _____ __...,oc,-_...,,,.....,..,,~t:::::::~~------.4':.::...---~---=-=-------------~
0
--VM•l
(4. 7' from VEW· 1)
---VM·2
(7.8' from VEW•l)
--VM-3
(12.5' from VEW•l)
-...vM-6
(15.3' from VEW•l)
--VM-7 (19.9' from VEW·l)
-VM-8
(32.1' from VEW•l)
--VM•5
(42.6' from VEW· 1)
-VM-4
(52' from VEW•l )
0 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Elapsed Time -Hrs
50 ARCADIS
-
-------------------
Figure 5
November 2008 Pilot PIO vs. Time
120
100
80 e Q. E:
QI)
C '6 60
IV G.I a:
0 a:
40
20
0
0 5 10 15 20
Elapsed Time -Hrs
25 30 35 ARCADIS
-------------------
PPMv 700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 5 10
Figure 6
November 2008 Pilot Gas Analytical vs. Time
15 20 25
Elapsed Time Hrs
30 35 40 45 so
F=oo7 ~
ARCADIS
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "' i I 'li E ~ C .g I ~ g .. .:i ~ i ~ I I 0 ~ a: ~ ~ ) ID "' 0 Z I a: ~ 5 •6 in~ -%"L ~9 I ··i-!! ~-e~ u Q.C) Legend Excavation Limits 0 40 GRAPHIC SCALE 80 Feet NATIONAL STARCH CHECMICAL COMPANY CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA EXCAVATION LIMITS ARCADIS FIGURE 7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ::;
0.. .... ~ .... :.; I ..,
8 §
I i .. ::;
a: ~
"' I ... < t ~ :!i
~ ~ 0..
I (j ~ a: in
0 1ij .... C ,g iii ..
0 z
I
I
0
• AirSparge_SoilYapor
CJ 75' Air Sparge Buffer
• Soil Vapor Locations
CJ 30' Soil Vapor Buffer
Sample Locations
♦ Extraction Well, Bedrock
♦ Extraction Well, Transition
0 Monitoring Well, Bedrock
0 Monitoring Well, Saprolile
0 Monitoring Well, Transition
■ Sediment
• Surface Water
Staff Gauge
60
GRAPHIC SCALE
120
Feet
NATIONAL STARCH CHECMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
AIR SPARGE AND
SOIL VAPOR WELL LOCATIONS
~ ARCADIS FIGURE
10
I
I
I w
I I ~ "' I "'
I ~ 0 :Ii ..
~
I I §
~ g
I ..
t i ~
I i
~
I I ~
I IL ~ "' ~ £ x
I ~
!
~
ii I w
&;~ n --~
I ~~ ~1 8-"""' ~--' .. 0
I -~ ~~
i! ~
i~
I i~
85 ""0 ff s
I u 9) I H i&l
I ~ oj
J"' .~ ;d ..
~~ 'i I ~~ ~~ t -~ I I st
Depth Below
Land Surface
(ft.)
Minimum 1' bis
Approx. 3.5 bis
Approx. 5.0' bis
Building Column
To Vacuum--¼
2" Diameter Boll Valve --
~--go· Elbow r Concrete Pod
--¼ To Vacuum
ff _,__
Neat Portland Cement
(Minimum thickness of 1 foot)
------Top of Bentonite Seal
lfoL.J.+------Top of Filter Pock
Not To Scole
2-inch Diameter, Schedule
40, PVC Well Cosing
2-inch Diameter
Stainless Steel
Wire Wrap Well Screen
NATIONAL STARCH, LLC
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
Proposed SVE
Well Construction Diagram
Interior Installation
ARCADIS FIGURE
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
Depth Below
Land Surface
(ft.)
Minimum 2.5' bis
Approx. 3.5 bis
Approx. 5.0' bis
Approx. 15.0' bis
Water-Tight Steel Manhole
~-Quick Connect
2" Diameter Ball Valve
Land Surface or Concrete Slab
Asphalt Surface
-------1 To Vacuum
,...__ __ Neat Portland Cement
Minimum thickness of 1 foot
Top of Bentonite Seal
Top of Filter Pack
--j,j;;;;;;;\------2-inch Diameter, Schedule
Not To Scale
40, PVC Well Cosing
Nominal 8-inch
Diameter Borehole
2-inch Diameter
Stainless Steel
Wire Wrap Well Screen
Bose of Screen/Total Depth
Threaded Plug
NATIONAL STARCH, LLC
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
Proposed SVE
Well Construction Diagram
Exterior Installation
ARCADIS FIGURE
9
- -- --
SVE
WELLS
48 TOTAL
16/ZONE
INLET
AIR
AMBIENT
1
Stream Name SVE Well Flow
Flow Rate 435 scfm
Air Mass Flow Rate 46,855 I bs/dav
DCA Concentration 650 ppmv initial
DCA Mass Rate 110Ibs/day
Pressure 13.8 psi a
Temperature 60 F
Water Co nee ntration 0.016 I bs/I b DA
Water Mass Rate 750 lbs/day
Phase Gas
Unit Efficlen
-
Dilution Air
0scfm
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
- -
B
r
C
Blower Discharge
435 scfm
46,855 I bs/day
NA
110 lbs/day
15.1 psia
200 F
NA
750 lbs/day
Gas
- ---Figure 11
Process Flow Diagram
~
Lean Air Discharge
435scfm
46,855 lbs/day
1.11 bs/day
200 F
Gas
1%
CAT OX
IAS WELLS
16 TOTAL
8/ZONE
DRIER
Scrubber Slowdown
4gpm
NA
NA
NA
NA
70 F
78.2 lbs Cl/day
47,940 lbs/dav
liquid
- - -
♦
- -
AIR EMISSION
DISCHARGE
SCRUBBER -► BLOWDOWN TO
WWTP
-
INSTRUMENT
AIRTO
CONTROLS
Inlet Air Wet Instr Afr Dry Instr Air Well Sparge Afr
64 scfm 5 scfm 4 scfm 59scfm
6,9121 bs/dav 576Ibs/day 432 lbs/day 6,336 lbs/dav
NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA
14.7 psi a 139.7 ps ia 129.7 psla SO psla
60F 130 F 100 F 100 F
0.016 I bs /I b DA 0.016 lbs/I b DA < 10 ppmv NA
111 lbs/day 9 lbs/day NA 102Ibs/day
Gas Gas Gas Gas
-
I
I
I
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
Depth Below
Land Surface
(ft.)
2-faat thick
2-faat above
Tap of Screen
Approx. 30' bis
or Auger Refusal
~-, .
.. • . .,
Water-Tight Steel Manhole
~-Quick Connect
2" Diameter Ball Valve
Concrete Slab
Nominal 4-inch
Diameter Borehole
Cement Grout with
5% Bentonite
n';;'·.,7· ___ 2-inch Diameter, Schedule
•·, 40, PVC Well Casing ;.;,.::
Not To Scale
Tap of Bentonite Seal
Top of Filter Pack
5-foot, 2-inch Diameter.,
Stainless Steel
Wire Wrap Well Screen
Bose of Screen/Total Depth
Threaded Plug
NATIONAL STARCH, LLC
SALISBURY. NORTH CAROLINA
Proposed Air Sparge
Well Construction Diagram
Exterior Installation
~ARCADIS I·
FIGURE
12
I
I
,m
D
D
fl .,
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
ARCADIS
Appendix A
Summary Monthly Progress
Report -December 2008
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. Kenneth Lucas
United States Environmental Protection Agency -Region 4
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303-3104
Subject
RD/RA Progress Report -2008 Summary
National Starch & Chemical Company
Cedar Springs Road Plant Site
Salisbury, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Lucas:
On behalf of National Starch & Chemical Company, ARCADIS U.S., Inc. (ARCADIS;
formerly known as Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc.) is submitting the attached RD/RA
Progress Report summarizing 2008 activities. This summary report has been
prepared pursuant to the Consent Decree in the matter of United States v. National
Starch & Chemical Company. Section XI, Paragraph 26, Reporting Requirements
and the Unilateral Administrative Order (U.S. EPA Docket No. 95-35-C), Section XIV,
Progress Reports. Monthly progress reports were not submitted between April 2007
and November 2008 due to an oversight. All activities for 2007 are summarized in
the 2007 Site Monitoring Report (ARCADIS, November 18, 2008). This progress
report summarizes the work that has been conducted at the site since January 2008.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at 864-
987-3906 or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
ARCADIS U.S., Inc.
~~
Elizabeth Rhine
Project Manager
ARCAD1S U.S., Inc.
30 Patewood Drive
Suite 155
Greenville
South Carolina 287 49
Tel [phone]
Fax [phone]
www.arcadis-us.com
Environmental
Date:
December 12, 2008
Contact:
Elizabeth Rhine
Phone:
864-987-3906
Email:
Elizabeth.rhine@
arcadis-us.com
Our ref:
80060013
I
I
I
I.
·'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Copies:
Angela Dehl, National Starch and Chemical Company
David Simons, National Starch and Chemical Company
Debra Rubenstein, National Starch and Chemical Company
Richard Steinert, National Starch & Chemical Company
11+(Jl'.ix A-2XJ3 Fm;Jess ~ etc
Mr. Ken Lucas
December 12, 2008
I
a
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OPERABLE UNITS ONE AND TWO
RD/RA PROGRESS REPORT -2008 SUMMARY
NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT SITE
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
1. ACTIONS TAKEN TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH ADMINISTRATIVE
ORDER
a. NS-57-B and NS-58-T were installed and piezometers P-02-B and P-04-B
were converted to monitoring wells.
b. Monitoring and maintenance activities of the OU2 Trench Area were
conducted in May and November 2008.
c. Water levels measurements were taken on December 1, 2008.
2. SAMPLING AND OTHER TEST DATA
a. Monitoring activities were conducted in May (RCRA) and December 2008.
Biogeochemical parameters were voluntarily added to the sampling and
analysis plan for select wells. The data will be used to evaluate other
remedial alternatives.
b. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected in the OU2 Trench Area
Reforestation in October 2008.
3. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED OR ANTICIPATED
a. A fire occurred on October 17, 2008 and burned the scrubber associated
with the catalytic oxidizer. The catalytic oxidizer is down for at least 6
months until the scrubber can be replaced. Replacement scrubber depends
on ultimate use of the cat-ox unit, and a larger unit will be required if it is
used to treat SVE exhaust for OU4. Based on the evaluation of other
remedial alternatives for OU1 and treatment of the SVE exhaust for OU4,
cat-ox unit may not be put back into service.
I ~xA-2X6F\-cgessf11_d:c
Mr. Ken Lucas
December 12, 2008
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
b. OU1 -Capture zone analysis has been conducted on wells NS-55, NS-56,
and NS-57. The results of the analysis concluded that extraction rates at
NS-56 and NS-57 are too low and the radius of influence simulated little to
no capture. NS-55 simulated a radius of influence over 1000 feet; however,
very little mass is observed in the well as it is significantly sidegradient and
downgradient of the mass.
c. OU1 -Capture zone analysis has been conducted on existing extraction
wells EX-01 through EX-10. EX-06 and EX-7 have insufficient capture zones
at their current rate of extraction. EX-06 · consistently meets ROD
performance standards and EX-07 normally meets the ROD performance
standard, and the data suggest it is the edge of the plume. These two wells
have been taken off-line to prevent migration of impacted groundwater into
clean areas. Combined flow of these extraction wells is 0.74 gpm, well
below the design pumping rate of 12 gpm. Flow reduction is a result of the
drought and bacterial grow1h and debris in the lines. Until the water table
recovers from the drought, groundwater extraction is not productive.
d. OU2 -No problems were encountered or anticipated with OU2.
4. ACTIONS PLANNED FOR JANUARY 2009
a. OU1 -Alternative groundwater remedial action will be evaluated based on
additional work.
b. OU2 -None.
~~A-2Cl'8Pro;ress~dx
Mr. Ken Lucas
December 12, 2008
D
E
I\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
OPERABLE UNITS THREE AND FOUR
RD/RA PROGRESS REPORT -2008 SUMMARY
NATIONAL STARCH AND CHEMICAL COMPANY
CEDAR SPRINGS ROAD PLANT SITE
SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
1. ACTIONS TAKEN TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH ADMINISTRATIVE
ORDER
a. OU3 -The OU3 Extraction Wells, Groundwater Collection Trench, and
Combined Pre-Treatment Plant were operating. Water level measurements
and groundwater samples were collected on December 1, 2008.
b. OU4 -An SVE pilot test was conducted in March 2008 to determine if a SVE
system was a viable technology for removing contaminants from the OU4
area. Additional vapor monitoring wells were installed in August 2008 and a
second SVE pilot test was conducted in November 2008. These data are
summarized in the OU4 Remedial Design Work Plan.
c. On November 20, 2008, NSCC met with Ken Lucas (EPA) and Dave
Mattison (NCDENR) to discuss the OU4 Remedial Design for the SVE
system and recommendations for an expanded system.
2. SAMPLING AND OTHER TEST DATA
a. OU3 -Groundwater samples were collected in December 2008.
b. OU4 -Air samples were collected as part of the SVE pilot tests conducted in
March and November 2008. Results provided information as to vapor
concentrations and expected mass recovery rates for the SVE system. Data
from both events are included in the appendices to the OU4 Remedial
Design Work Plan.
3. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED OR ANTICIPATED
a. OU3 -On October 24, 2008, a fire occurred resulting in damage to the
scrubber unit and the surrounding building. The cause of the fire could not
be determined. Anguil (the manufacturer of the equipment) conducted a site
Jw)U~A-2Cl.'6Prcgess~ch:
Mr. Ken Lucas
December 12, 2008
I
I
.I
I
8
B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
visit. Cause of the fire could not be determined. The scrubber skid and
cataylist will need to be replaced. Additional upgrades were recommended
before the cat-ox unit is brought back into service.
b. OU4 -Elevated vapor concentrations are expected during the initial SVE
system startup. Therefore, a temporary treatment system, in addition to the
full scale treatment system, is proposed to treat these vapors so that the
system does not have to be over-designed.
c. OU4 SVE Remedial Design was submitted to EPA on July 11, 2008. Based
on EPA and NCDENR comments received on September 17, 2008 and
review of the new ARCADIS East Coast team, the original design was
reworked and presented to EPA and NCDENR on November 20, 2008. A
revised OU4 Remedial Design Work Plan was submitted in December 2008.
4. ACTIONS PLANNED FOR JANUARY 2009
a. OU3 -The groundwater extraction remedy will be evaluated with respect to
pumping parameters and additional biogeochemical parameters analyzed
during the annual monitoring event. Persulfate and reductive dechlorination
will be evaluated, along with other technologies. If it is determined that
groundwater extraction is still the best remedial alternative for OU3, work will
be conducted towards replacing the scrubber skid so that the treatment
system can bec_ome operational was again.
b. OU4 -Activities described in the OU4 Remedial Design Work Plan will
begin.
I ~xA-:.IOJPrcgess~ch:
Mr. Ken Lucas
December 12, 2008
I
I
I
I
D
u
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS·
Appendix B
March 2008 Pilot Test Laboratory
Reports on Gas Samples
I
I
0
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Test America
THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
ANALYTICAL REPORT
NSCC SVE Pilot Test
Lot#: H8D010167
Michael P. Fleischner
ARCADIS U.S., Inc.
2033 North Main Street
Suite 340
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
TESTAMERICA LABORATORIES, INC.
Jamie A. McKinney
Project Manager
April 9, 2008
~
5815 Middlebrook Pike Knoxville. TN 37921 tel [phone] fax [phone] www.testamericainc.com
I
I
0
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Test America
THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
ANALYTICAL REPORT
NSCC SVB Pilot Test
Lot#: H8D010167
J. · Kenneth Brinson
ARCADIS U.S., Inc.
14055 Riveredge Drive
SUite 400
Tampa, FL 33637
TESTAMBRICA LABORATORIES, INC.
r {µ;rlcro
Jamie A. McKinney
Project Manager
April 9, 2008
5815 Middlebrook Pike Knoxville, TN 37921 tel [phone] fax [phone] www.testamericainc.com
I
I
I
I
I
0
D
ll
I
I
I
I
I
ii
I
I
I
I
ANALYTICAL METHODS SUMMARY
H8D010167
ANALYTICAL
~P=ARAM==E~T~ER~--------------------~ME=TH~O~D~-----
Volatile Organics by TOlS EPA-2 T0-15
References:
EPA-2 "Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic
Organic Compounds in Ambient Air", EPA-625/R-96/0lOb,
January 1999.
I
I
I
I
0
0
u
IJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WO# SAMPLE# CLIENT SAMPLE ID
KKHRN
KKHRP
NOTE (S)
001
002
VEW-l(l0HG)
VM-3 (l0HG)
SAMPLE SUMMARY
H8D010167
• The analy1ical results of the samples llsted above arc presented on the following pages.
•. All calculations arc pcrfonncd before rounding 10 avoid round-orf errors in calculated results.
-Results noted as ~No~ were noi detected at or ;ibove ll1c stated limit.
• This rcpon must no\ be reproduced, except in full, without lhc written approval of 1hc laboratory.
• Results for the following parameters .1rc never rcponcd on a dry weight basis: color, corroslvlty, density, flashpoint, ignit.ibility, layers. odor,
paint filter test, pH, porosity pressure. rcaclivily. redo:< po1cnllal, specific gravity, spot 1csts, solids, solubili1y, temperature, viscosity, and weight.
SAMPLED SAMP
DATE TIME
03/27/08 10:35
03/27/08 12:15
I
I
I
I
I
0
u
I
I
I
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROJECT NARRATIVE
H8D010167
The results reported herein are applicable to the samples submitted for analysis only.
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the
laboratory.
The original chain of custody documentation is included with this report.
Sample Receipt
There were no problems with the condition of the samples received.
Quality Control and Data Interpretation
Unless otherwise noted, all holding times and QC criteria were met and the test results
shown in this report meet all applicable NELAC requirements.
The surrogate recoveries for all the samples were quantitated against the daily calibration
verification standard for batch 8099142 and 8098135.
The EPA method requires that all target analytes in the continuing calibration verification
standard be within 30% difference from the initial calibration. The laboratory standard
operating procedure allows up to four analytes in the calibration verification to be 540%
difference from the initial calibration. The calibration verification analyzed on 4/4/08
exhibited a %difference of>40% for carbon tetrachloride. Since the recovery was high
for carbon tetrachloride and this compound was not detected in the sample above the RL,
there is no impact on the data.
Although non-target analyte toluene is flagged as being outside recovery limits in the·
laboratory control sample for batch 8099142, the laboratory control sample is in control.
The standard operating procedure allows for two nonpolar analyte recoveries between
60% and 140% and two polar analyte recoveries between 45% and 155%.
TestAmerica Knoxville maintains the following certifications, approvals and accreditations: Arkansas DEQ Cert. #05-
043-0, California DHS ELAP Cert. #2423, Colorado DPHE, Connecticut DPH Cert. #PH-0223, Florida DOH Cert.
#E87177, Georgia DNR Cert. #906, Hawaii DOH, Illinois EPA Cert. #000687, Indiana DOH Cert. #C-TN-02, Iowa
DNR Cert. #375, Kansas DHE Cert. #E-10349, Kentuc~-y DEP Lab ID #90101, Louisiana DEQ Cert. #03079,
Louisiana DOHH Cert. #LA030024, Maryland DHMH Cert. #277, Massachusetts DEP Cert. #M-TN009, Michigan
DEQ Lab ID #9933, New Jersey DEP Cert. #TN00I, New York DOH Lab# 10781, North Carolina DPH Lab ID
#21705, North Carolina DEHNR Cert. #64, Ohio EPA V AP Cert. #CL0059, Oklahoma DEQ ID #9415, Pennsylvania
DEP Cert. #68-00576, South Carolina DHEC Lab ID #84001001, Tennessee DOH Lab ID #02014, Utah DOH Cert.#
QUAN3, Virginia DGS Lab ID #00165, Washington DOE Lab #Cl20, West Virginia DEP Cert. #345, Wisconsin
DNR Lab ID #998044300, Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center and USDA Soil Permit #S-46424. This list of
approvals is subject to change and docs not imply that laboratory certification is available for all parameters reported in
this environmental sample data report.
I
I
I
I
I
a
D
O Sample Data Summary
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
' :I
'
I
I
I
I
m
I
0
0
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS U.S., Inc.
Client Sample .ID: VEW-1 (lOHG)
GC/MS Volatiles
Lot-Sample it ... : H8D010167-001 Work Order JI ••• : KKHRNlAA
Date Received .. : 03/28/08
Analysis Date .. : 04/04/08
Date Sampled ... : 03/27/08
Prep Date ...... : 04/04/08
Prep Batch it ... : 8098135
Dilution.Factor: 353504 Method ......... : EPA-2 T0-15
REPORTING
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
Acetonitrile ND 350000
Acrylonitrile ND 710000
Benzene ND 71000
Carbon tetrachloride ND 71000
1,1-Dichloroethane ND 71000
1,2-Dichloroethane 13000000 71000
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND. 71000
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 71000
1,1-Dichloroethene ND 71000
Methylene chloride ND 180000
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 71000
1,1,l-Trichloroethane ND 71000
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 71000
Trichloroethene ND 71000
Vinyl chloride 230000 71000
PERCENT RECOVERY
SURROGATE RECOVERY LIMITS
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 95 (70 -130)
Toluene-dB 104 (70 -130)
4-Bromofluorobenzerie Bl (70 -130)
Matrix ......... : AIR
UNITS
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb (v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb (v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
I
I
I
I
I
0
0
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS U.S., Inc.
Client Sample ID: VM-3(10HG)
GC/MS Volatiles
Lot-Sample# ... : H8D010167-002 Work Order # ... : KKHRPlAA
Date Received .. : 03/28/08
Analysis Date .. : 04/07/08
Date Sampled ... : 03/27/08
Prep Date ...... : 04/07/08
. Prep Batch ll ... : 8099142
Dilution Factor: 1105133. Method ......... : EPA-2 T0-15
REPORTING
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
Acetonitrile ND 1100000
Acrylonitrile ND 2200000
Benzene ND 220000
Carbon tetrachloride ND 220000
1,1-Dichloroethane ND 220000
1,2-Dicbloroetbane 32000000 220000
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 220000
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 220000
1,1-Dichloroethene ND 220000
Methylene chloride ND 550000
l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 220000
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 220000
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 220000
Trichloroethene ND 220000
Vinyl chloride 280000 220000
PERCENT RECOVERY
SURROGATE RECOVERY LIMITS
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 77 (70 -130)
Toluene-dB 99 (70 -130)
4-Bromofluorobenzene 76 (70 -130)
Matrix ......... : AIR
UNITS
ppb(v/v)
ppb (v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb (v/v)
ppb(v/v)
ppb (v/v)
ppb(v/v)
I
I
I
I
I
0
0
E
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
METHOD BLANK REPORT
GC/MS Volatiles
Client Lot JI ••• : H8D010167 Work Order ll ... : KKTHFlAA Matrix ......... : AIR
MB Lot-Sample#: H8D070000-135
Prep Date ...... : 04/04./08
Analysis Date .. : · 04/04/08 Prep Batch JI ••• : 8098135
Dilution Factor: 1
REPORTING
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT UNITS METHOD
Acetonitrile ND 1.0 ppb(v/v) EPA-2 TO-15
Acrylonitrile ND 2.0 ppb(v/v) EPA-2 TO-15
Benzene ND 0.20 ppb(v/v) EPA-2 TO-15
Carbon tetrachloride ND 0. 20 ppb(v/v) EPA-2 TO-15
1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.20 ppb(v/v) EPA-2 TO-15
1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.20 ppb(v/v) EPA-2 TO-15
1,1-Dichloroethene ND 0 .20 ppb(v/v) EPA-2 TO-15
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.20 ppb(v/v) EPA-2 TO-15
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 0.20 ppb(v/v) EPA-2 TO-15
Methylene chloride ND 0.50 ppb (v/v) EPA-2 T0-15
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.20 ppb(v/v) EPA-2 TO-15
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.20 ppb(v/v) EPA-2 TO-15
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.20 ppb(v/v) EPA-2 TO-15
Trichloroethene ND 0.20 ppb(v/v) EPA-2 TO-15
Vinyl chloride ND 0.20 ppb(v/v) EPA-2 TO-15
PERCENT RECOVERY
SURROGATE RECOVERY LIMITS
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 118 (70 -130)
Toluene-de 105 (70 -130)
4-Bromofluorobenzene 99 (70 -130)
NOTE(S):
Cnlculatians are performed before rounding 10 avoid round-off errors in calculated results.
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE EVALUATION REPORT
GC/MS Volatiles
Client Lot# ... : HBD010167 Work Order# ... : KKTHFlAC
LCS Lot-Samplejl: H8D070000-135
Prep Date ...... : 04/04/08 Analysis Date .. : 04/04/08
Prep Batch# ..• : 8098135
Dilution Factor: l
PARAMETER
Benzene
Trichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethene
Toluene
CbJ.orobenzene
SURROGATE
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-dB
4-Bromofluorobenzene
NOTE(S}:
PERCENT
RECOVERY
96
101
107
98
100
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(70 -130)
(70 -130)
(70 -130)
(70 -130)
(70 -130)
PERCENT
RECOVERY
100
100
100
Cnlcula1ions are pcrfonncd before rounding 10 avoid round-off errors in c:alcul:11ed results.
Bold print denotes control parameters
Matrix ......... : AIR
METHOD
EPA-2 T0-15
EPA-2 TO-15
EPA:2 TO-15
EPA-2 TO-15
EPA-2 T0-15
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(70 -130)
{70 -130)
(70 -130)
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE DATA REPORT
GC/MS Volatiles
Client Lot jf ••• : H8D010167 Work Order# ... : KKTHFlAC
LCS Lot-Sample#: H8D070000-135
Prep Date ...... : 04/04/08 Analysis Date .. : 04/04/08
Prep Batch lt ••• : 8098135
Dilution Factor: 1·
SPIKE MEASURED
PARAMETER AMOUNT AMOUNT
Benzene 10.0 9.6l.
Trichloroethene l.0.0 l.O . l.
1,l.-Dichloroethene 10.0 10.7
Toluene 10.0 9.78
Chlorobenzene 10.0 9.99
PERCENT
SURROGATE RECOVERY
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 100
Toluene-dB l.00
4-Bromofluorobenzene l.00
NOTE (S):
Calculations arc performed before rounding 10 avoid round~off errors in ca\cufatcd results.
Bold print denotes control paramc1ers
Matrix ......... : AIR
PERCENT
UNITS RECOVERY METHOD
ppb(v/v) 96 EPA-2
ppb(v/v) 101 EPA-2
ppb(v/v) 107 EPA-2
ppb(v/v) 98 EPA-2
ppb(v/v) 100 EPA-2
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(70 -130)
(70 -130)
(70 -l.30)
TO-l.5
T0-15
T0-15
T0-15
T0-15
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client Lot JI ••• : HBD010167
MB Lot-Sample ll: HBDOB0000-142
Analysis Date .. : 04/07/08
Dilution Factor: l
PARAMETER
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methylene. chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,l-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
SURROGATE
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-dB
4-Bromofluorobenzene
NOTE(S):
METHOD BLANK REPORT
GC/MS Volatiles
Work Order# ... : KKVOTlAA
Prep Date ...... : 04/07/08
Prep Batch # ... :·8099142.
REPORTING
RESULT LIMIT
ND 0.20
ND 0.20
ND 0.20
ND 0.20
ND 0.20
ND 0.20
ND 0.50
ND 0.20
ND 0.20
ND 0.20
ND 0.20
ND 0.20
ND 1.0
ND 2.0
ND 0.20
PERCENT RECOVERY
RECOVERY LIMITS
108 (70 -130)
103 (70 -130)
96 (70 -130)
Cnlcul::itions arc pcrfonned before rounding 10 avoid round-off errors in calcut,ued results.
Matrix ......... : AIR
UNITS METHOD
ppb (v/v) EPA-2 T0-15
ppb(v/v) EPA-2 T0-15
ppb (v/v) EPA-2 T0-15
ppb(v/v) EPA-2 T0-15
ppb(v/v) EPA-2 T0-15
ppb(v/v) EPA-2 T0-15
ppb(v/v) EPA-2 T0-15
ppb(v/v) EPA-2 T0-15
ppb(v/v) EPA-2 T0-15
ppb(v/v) EPA-2 T0-15
ppb(v/v) EPA-2 T0-15
ppb(v/v) EPA-2 T0-15
ppb(v/v) EPA-2 T0-15
ppb(v/v) EPA-2 T0-15
ppb (v/v) EPA-2 T0-15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE EVALUATION REPORT
GC/MS Volatiles
Client Lot# ... : H8D010167 Work Order# ... : KKV0TlAC
LCS Lot-Samplell: HBD0B0000-142
Prep Date ...... : 04/07/08 Analysis Date .. : 04/07/08
Prep Batch lt ... : 8099142
Dilution Factor: l
PARAMETER
1,1-Dichloroethene
Benzene
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
SURROGATE
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Toluene-dB
4-Bromofluorobenzene
NOTE (S) :
PERCENT
RECOVERY
108
77
77
69 a
74
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(70 -130)
(70 -130)
(70 -130)
(70 -130)
(70 -130)
PERCENT
RECOVERY
100
100
100
Calculntions arc performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in caJculatcd rcsulls.
Dold prim denotes control parameters
a Spiked analyte recovery is oulS!dc staled comrol llmits,
Matrix ......... : AIR
METHOD
EPA-2 TO-15
EPA-2 T0-15
EPA-2 TO-15
EPA-2 T0-15
EPA-2 T0-15
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(70 -130)
(70 -130)
(70 -130)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE DATA REPORT
GC/MS Volatiles
Client Lot# ... : H8D010167 Work Order# ... : KKV0TlAC
LCS Lot-Sampleil: H8D080000-l42
Prep Date ...... : 04/07/08 Analysis Date .. : 04/07/08
Prep Batch# .•. : 8099142
Dilution Factor: l
SPIKE MEASURED
PARAMETER AMOUNT AMOUNT
1,1-Dichloroethene 10.0 10.8
Benzene 10.0 7.68
Tricbloroethene 10.0 7.69
Toluene 10 .o 6.85 a
Chlorobenzene 10.0 7.40
PERCENT
SURROGATE RECOVERY
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 100
Toluene-dB 100
4-Bromofluorobenzene 100
NOTE (SJ:
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round~orr errors ln calcul:ncd rcsulls.
Bold prim denotes control parameters
a Spiked :maly11: recovery Is outside stated connol limiis.
Matrix ......... : AIR
PERCENT
UNITS RECOVERY METHOD
ppb{v/v) 108 EPA-2
ppb{v/v) 77 EPA-2
ppb{v/v) 77 EPA-2
ppb(v/v) 69 EPA-2
ppb{v/v) 74 EPA-2
RECOVERY
LIMITS
(70 -130)
(70 -130)
(70 -130)
TO-15
TO-15
TO-15
T0-15
TO-15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Sample Receipt Documentation
I
I
I
I
g
0
0
D
E
I
I!!!!!!!
TAL Knoxville
5815 Middlebrook Pike
Knoxville, TN 37921
phone [phone] fax [phone]
==
Client Contact Information M;\Cc. ~/«r'stl,11er
Company: A,1".!.;::,
Address: ao3'3 Notfl-M .. : ... s+.-~e-1-
Cit\1/State/Zip , .1 ..... 1 ..,. ',,,..-.,,~ui _,,-LI ,Y-
Phone: q::i.,-;>.7'1• rlOO
FAX:
Project Name: NSCC:.. s" f! fi[o~ ni,
Site/location: <.. J · • . ....ic..
PO# I •
Sample Identification
v~w-1 ( ro 1.J'\l
,tK-"3 ( co 1-1,, -
Sampled by:
/3,,;., .. f...ov1d.,,._
Special Instructions/QC Requirements & Comments:
Canisters Shipped by:
SamplPs.Re!i~shed. {3
1
£ .,. A -5~ -,;...._ o .,'trt-.
Helinquished By:
--liiii -----\-\~ l.:IDI n I\, l - - - - -
Canister Samples Chain of Custody Record TestArrlerica
TeslAmedca assumes no liability with respect to the calloction and shipment of these samples. Tl-tE·LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTiMG
T,4t. T Proiect Manaoer. CHIii'-l'f~rri.,. .. ~✓ Same led Bv: ifl,,;_ • I Q,/4r"-.. I of I .COCs
Phone: I
Site Contact:
TAL Contact: c " ~ 0 ti • • • • • .
il • Analvsls Turnaround Time 0 C C
Standard (Soecir..,1 .. .s :a "" Rush (Specify) ·a • • ~ ~ l} .. • ~ ~ !;; ~ • ~ ~ • I'-• • ~nlstor Canlslor 0 6 • < c • '-' tf. --norc.. < 0 .. e;_ . -S! ..
~ • 0q4'. V.icuum In V.tJcuum In .. ~ M N . :; ~ "-0 • '-' iE --Flald, NHg Flald, ·Hg Flow Controller 6 "" < ... 0 E. 0 :;; :g· "O • 6 = E C = 0. 0. UJ 5 ~· "O • 5 -"""'-Titno Stop (Start) (Stop) 10 Canlstor ID ... ... w w < = < UJ -'
ro3~ 3~7.d ,JfA rJ/A l'35~t.J ✓ ·'·
1;),S 3.;r1-o > v1A IAJ/A C.~7t... ✓ I ·•-
I/
fr?
·'?
T0mp0raturo (Fnhronholt)
Interior Ambient
S1.>rt ?o"'F -,o•r
Slop ·?o't=-?,:s""i=
Pressure (Inches or Hg) lf'G'C. FIT ~/J'/8/t:AIT
lntorlor Amblant cu.rropy S"t:19L. /,'IT/JCT
Start I /Jox lfH J/"8',/4>J
Slop r.r-" ,C-v-# f!(,U7Q//J;"7>-,~
.l CA/JS/ 0 FLol,/S
Date/Time: Canisters R~~d by.f.t ~ -i~ -: ... Le...,.~
Datemme: ~ // fn S-3-~7.o"/ t Receh£° ~
Date/Time: R;,'?'iv~? by:7 / _ , I , .J. .o,,,-
II // , '
lill - --- - - -- --- -- - --TEST AMERICA KNOXVILLE SAMPLE RECEIPT/CONDITION UPON RECEIPT ANOMALY CHECKLIST
Client: -----------------Project: _____________ Lot Number: \-)'i;DO)Dllo)
Review Items \'n x. NA If No, what wns the problem? Comments/Actions Tali:cn·
I. Do sample conrnincr labels match COC? D lo Do not match COC
(IDs, Dates, Times) D 1 b Incomplete information
D I c Marking smeared
D Id Label torn -✓ D le No label
D If COC not received
D lg Other:
2. Is the cooler 1cmpcraturc within limils? (> freezing D 2a Temp Blank= -
temp. ofwatcrto 6°C; NC, 1668, 1613B: 0-4°C; ✓ 02b Cooler Temp=
YOST: I 0"C; MA: 2-6 "C)
3. Were samples received with correct chemical · ✓ D 3a Sample preservative =
preservative (excluding Encore)?
4. Were custody seals present/intact on cooler and/or D 4a Not present
containers? / O~b Not intact
O4c Other:
5. \Vere all of the samples listed on the COC received? ./ D Sa Samples rcccivcd-nol on CCC
D Sb Samples not received-on COC
6. Were all of the sample containers received intact? ✓ O6a Leaking
O6b Broken
7. \Vere VOA samples received without hcadspacc? ,/ O7a l-leadsnace (VOA only)
8. \Vere samples received in appropriate containers? ✓ 0 8:1 Improper container
9. Did you check for residual chlorine, if necessary? ✓ D 9a Could not be determined due
to matrix interference
10. \Vere samples received within holding time? ./ D 1 Oa Holding time expired
11. For md samples, was sample activity info. provided? ✓ 0 lncomolcte information
12. For SOG water samples ( 1613B, I 668A, 8290, LR ✓ If yes & appears to be >I%, was
PAHs), do samples have visible solids present? SOG notified?
13. Arc the shipping containers intact? ✓ □ 13:t Leaking
D 13b Other:
14. \Vas COC relinquished? (Signed/Datedffimed) ./ D 14:t Not relinquished
15. Arc tests/parameters listed for each sample? / 015:1 Incomplete infonnation
16. Is the matrix of the samples noted? ✓ 015a lnconmlctc information
17. ls the date/time of sample collection noted? / 0 I 5;.t' Incomplete information
18. Is the client and project name/JI identified? ,/ □ I Sa Incomplete infonnation
19. \Vas the sanmler idc111iried on the COC? ✓
Quote#: 5i.L12 7 PM Instructions:
Sample Receiving Associate: -/~. JA• LL,,,,,,, Date: ? l:n lo y QA026R 19.doc, 080707
I 17' .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
ARCADIS
Appendix C
November 2008 Pilot Test Laborato,y
Reports on Gas Samples
------

-
--------,'--\~9 ~ (.)'I!. -
:::hain of Custody
Workorder: 9232328
16
Friday, November 14, 2008 4:11 :48 PM
----------------------"'.'"". ;2cel}!!,~:1if!l®
Workorder Name: NSCC/Akzo Nobel Pilot Study Results Requested
11/13/2008 08:15 9232328007 Air
;)1/1:i726g8;{2'1.?•Ii ··$2:i2:f2~oo~;;J;i
11/13/2008 16: 15 9232328009 Air
r+•·V-~ C--e_ Ji;,J.<r.-.i1-,;e---A-TL-i1f1i"-/-~ i~lD
\ .J
I
I
12/2/2008
Page 1 of :
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client:
Attn:
Pace Analytical
Kevin Herring
Client's Project: NSCC/Akzo Nobel Pilot Stmly
Date Received: 11/19/08
Matrix:
Units:
\I
Air
ppbv
. Lab No:
Client Snmnlc I.D.:
Date Samnlcd:
Date Anal"""cd:
QC Batch No:
Analyst Initials:
DUution Factor:
ANALYTE
Olchlorodlfiuoromethnnc (12)
Chloromcthanc
l,2-Cl-1,1,2,2-F ethane (114)
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomcth:mc
Chlorocthanc
richlorofluoromelh1mc (11)
1, 1-DlchlorocthcnC:
Carbon Disulfide
1,1,2-CI 1,2,1-F ethane (113)
Acetone
l.llethylene Chloride
-1,l-Dlchlorocthcne
I, 1-Dich]oroeth:me
Vinyl Acet::itc
c-1,2-Dlchloroethenc
2-Butanonc
-Butyl Methyl Ether
Chloroform
I, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,1-Dlchlorocthanc
frichlorocthcnc
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromcthanc
c-1,J-Dichloropropcnc
4-Mcthyl-2-Pcntanonc
troluene
l-1,3-Dichloropropcne
I, 1,2-Trichlorocthanc
rr ctrachlorocthcn c
-Hcxanonc
Dibromochloromcthane
1,2-Dibromocth:me
Chlorohcnzcnc
PQL
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
EPA Method TOIS
A8111904-0I A8111904-02 A8111904-03
VEW-1 ( I) VEW-1 ( 4) VEW-1 ( 8)
11/12/08 11/12/08 11/12/08
11/21/08 11/22/08 11/23/08
081121MS2AI 081122MS2AI 081122MS2A2
VM VM VM
5,100 960 1,500
Result RL Result RL Result RL
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND l0,000 ND 1,900 ND 3,000
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
7,700 5,100 2,600 960 3,300 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 25,000 ND 4,800 ND 7,600
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 25,000 9,100 4,800 ND 7,600
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 25,000 ND 4,800 ND 7,600
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
650,000 5,100 170,000 960 200,000 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND-1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
ND 5,100 ND 960 ND 1,500
Ai irT EC H NOL O G V Laboratories, Inc.
A8111904-04 A811 I 904-05
VEW-1 ( 12) VEW-1 ( 16)
11/13/08 11/13/08
11/22/08 11/22/08
081122MS2AI 081122MS2Al
VM VM
1,200 460
Result RL Result RL
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 2,400 ND 920
ND 1,200 ND 460
4,600 1,200 1,400 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 6,000 ND 2,300
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 6,000 ND 2,300
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 6,000 ND 2,300
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,100 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND· 1,200 ND 460
270,000 1,200 81,000 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
2,200 1,200 1,100 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 540 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
page1of2
_C:11ilo 11n • (;it11nflnrl11c::ln1 r:A Q174R 6 Ph: ffi26) 964-4032 ♦ Fx: (626} 964-5832
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client: Pace Analytical
Attn: Kevin Herring
CUcnt's Project:
Date Received:
Matrix:
Units:
NSCC/Akzo Nobel Pilot Study
11/19/08
Air
ppbv
11 EPA Method TOIS
Lab No:
Client Samole I.D.:
Dale Sampled:
Dale Analyzed:
QC Batch No:
Analyst Initials:
Dilution Factor:
ANALYTE PQL
li.:lhylbcnzcne 1.0
p,&m-Xylcne 1.0
o-Xylene 1.0
Styrene 1.0
Bromoform 1.0
l, 1,2,2-T ctrachlorocthane 2.0
Benzvl Chloride 1.0
-Elhyl Toluene 1.0
1,J,S. Trimelhylbcnzene 2.0
1,2,4-T rimcthylbcnzenc 2.0
1,3-Dichlorobenzcnc 1.0
1,4-Dlthlorobcnzcnc 1.0
1,2-Dichlorobcnzenc 1.0
1,2,4. T rlchloro benzene 2.0
HexachlorobutaiUenc 1.0
PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit
ND= Not Detected (below RL)
RL = PQL X Dilution Factor
A8111904-0I A8111904-02
YEW-I ( I) YEW-I ( 4)
11/12/08 11/12/08
11/21/08 11/22/08
081121MS2AI 081122MS2Al
YM YM
5,100 960
Result RL Result RL
ND 5,100 ND 960
ND 5,100 ND 960
ND 5,100 ND 960
ND 5,100 ND 960
ND 5,100 ND 960
ND 10,000 ND 1,900
ND 5,100 ND 960
ND 5,100 ND 960
ND 10,000 ND 1,900
ND 10,000 ND 1,900
ND 5,100 ND 960
ND 5,100 ND 960
ND 5,100 ND 960
ND 10,000 ND 1,900
ND 5,100 ND 960
Reviewed/Approved By: ----1' '+1+/j+>~'-+-__ ,-----'ft-'~-MJ ,Jiif~hnson
Operations Manager
ll1c cover lcUcr is ;m inlegr:il part of this :in:ilytic:il 1cport
A8111904-03
YEW-1 ( 8)
11/12/08
11/23/08
081122MS2AI
YM
1,500
Result RL
ND 1,500
ND 1,500
ND 1,500
ND 1,500
ND 1,500
ND 3,000
ND 1,500
ND 1,500
ND 3,000
ND 3,000
ND 1,500
ND 1,500
ND 1,500
ND 3,000
ND 1,500
A;irTECHNOLOGY Laboratories, Inc.
II
AS! 11904-04 A8111904-05
YEW-I ( 12) YEW-I ( 16)
11/13/08 11/13/08
11/22/08 11/22/08
081122MS2Al 081122MS2A I
YM YM
1,200 460
Result RL Result RL
ND 1,200 810 460
ND 1,200 5,700 460
ND 1,200 2,700 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 2,400 ND 920
ND l,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 2,600 460
ND 2,400 ND 920
ND 2,400 3,100 920
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND 1,200 ND 460
ND. 2,400 ND 920
ND 1,200 ND 460
Date __ ,,...· ,,z..'-,/ .... ·.-'-,,-'/..,o'---'-Y·_/_
page 2 of 2
Hl~fl1 I= r.:~1"" .111.omu=> .~11il.o 1.~n • r.itvnflnrl11.c:frv. r.A 91748 o Ph: [phone] ♦ Fx: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client: Pace Analytical
Attn: Kevin Herring
Client's Project: NSCC/Akzo Nobel Pilot Study
\I
Date Received: 11/19/08
Matrix:
Units:
Air
ppbv
Lab No:
Client Sample J.D.:
Date Samolcd:
Date Analyzed:
QC Batch No:
Analyst Initials:
Dilulion Factor:
ANALYTE
Dichlorodinuoromcthnnc (12)
Chloromcth:mc
l,2-Cl-1,1,2,2-F ethane (114)
iVinyl Chloride
Bromomcthane
Chlorocthane
ffrichlorofluoromcth:me (11)
1,1-Dichlorocthcne
Carbon Disulfide
1,1,2-CI l,2,2-F ethane (113)
Acetone
Methylene Chloride
t-1,2-Dichlorocthene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Vinyl Acetate
c-1 ,2-Diehloroetbcne
2-Butimone
t-Butyl Methyl Ether
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroclh:me
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dicblorocthanc
Tricbloroclhcnc
1,2-Dichloroprop:inc
Bromodiehloromethanc
e-1,J-Diehloropropenc
4-M cl h yl-2-Pen In none
Toluene
1-1,J-Dichloropropcne
1,1,2-Trichlorocth:ine
fctrachlorocthcnc
2-Hcxanonc
Diliromochloromctlrnnc
1,2-Dihromoethane
Chlorobcnzcnc
PQL
LO
2.0
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
5.0
LO
5.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
1.0
LO
LO
LO
1.0
1.0
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
1.0
LO
EPA Method TOIS
AS 111904•06 ASll 1904-07 AS I 11904-08
VEW-1 ( 20) VEW-1 ( 24) VEW-1 ( 28)
11/13/08 11/13/08 11/13/08
11/24/08 11/22/08 11/22/08
081124MS2A I 081122MS2AI 081122MS2Al
VM VM VM
980 1,200 1,200
Result RL Result RL Result RL
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
ND 2,000 ND 2.300 ND 2,400
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
3,900 980 4,400 1,200 4,800 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200. ND 1.200
ND 4,900 ND 5,800 ND 6,000
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
ND 4,900 ND 5,800 9,200 6,000
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1.200
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1.200
ND 4,900 ND 5,800 ND 6,000
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1.200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
230,000 980 260,000 1,200 260,000 1,200
ND 980 ND 1.200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,100
ND 980 ND 1,100 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,100 ND · 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1.200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1.200 ND 1.200
ND 980 ND 1,100 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1.200 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1.200 ND 1,100
A;irTECHNOLOGY Laboratories, Inc.
AS 111904-09
VEW-1 ( 32)
11/13/08
11/21/08
081121MS2Al
VM
1,300
Result RL
ND 1,300
ND 2,700
ND 1,300
4,300 I.JOO
ND 1.300
ND 1,300
ND 1,300
ND 1,300
ND 6,700
ND 1,300
ND 6,700
ND 1,300
ND !,JOO
ND !,JOO
ND 6.700
ND 1,300
ND 1,300
ND 1,300
ND l,JOO
ND 1,300
ND 1,300
ND 1,300
240,000 1,300
ND 1,300
ND 1,300
ND I.JOO
ND 1,300
ND 1,300
ND l,JOO
ND 1,300
ND 1,300
ND 1,300
ND 1,300
ND 1,300
ND 1,300
ND 1,300
1R.t;n1 F r::;:;1/p AvP.n1tR. S11ifP. 1.1n o Citv nf lnrfw~tN. CA 91748 o Ph: [phone] o Fx: [phone]
11
A81 l 1904-IO
VEW-1 ( 36)
11/14/08
. 11/21/08
081121MS2Al
VM
1,400
Result RL
ND J,400
ND 2,700
ND 1,400
4,100 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 6,800
ND 1,400
ND 6,800
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 6,800
ND 1,400
ND 1.400
ND 1.400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
250,000 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
ND 1,400
page 1 of 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client: Pace Analytical
Attn: Kevin Herring
Client's Project:
Dale Received:
Matrix:
Units:
NSCC/Akzo Nobel Pilot Study
11/19/08
Air
ppbv
Ii EPA Method TOIS
Lab No:
Client Samole I.D.:
Date Samoled:
Date Analyzed:
QC Batch No:
Analyst Initials:
Dilution Factor:
ANALYTE PQL
Ethylbcnzcnc 1.0
p,&m•Xylenc 1.0
o-Xvlcne 1.0
.:1vrcne 1.0
Bromoform 1.0
1,l ,2,2-T etrachlorocthane 2.0
Dcnzyl Chloritlc 1.0
L£thyl Toluene 1.0
1,3,5-T rimcthylbcnzcnc 2.0
J ,2,4-Trimethylbcnzcne 2.0
1,J-Dichlorobcnzcne 1.0
1,4-Dicblorobcnzcne 1.0
1,2-Dicblorobcnzcnc 1.0
l,2,4-Tricblorobcnzcne 2.0
ll exncb lorobutndicne 1.0
PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit
ND= Not Detected (below RL)
RL = PQL X Dilution Factor
A8111904-06 A8111904--07
YEW-I ( 20) YEW-I ( 24)
ll/13/08 11/13/08
11/24/08 11/22/08
081124MS2A I 081122MS2AI
YM YM
980 1,200
Result RL Result RL
ND 980 ND 1.200
ND 980 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200
ND 2,000 ND 2,300
ND 980 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1,200
ND 2,000 ND 1.300
ND 2,000 ND 2,300
ND 980 ND 1,200
ND 980 ND 1.200
ND 980 ND I.100
ND 2,000 ND 2,300
ND 980 ND 1,200
Reviewed/Approved By: __ 11+4.1+;1,.µ,14_.,_,w"-W-'-_,fa,i __
ivfl;iJohnson ✓
Operations Manager
The cover letter is nn integral p:i.rt of this nnalytical report
A8111904-08
YEW-I ( 28)
11/13/08
11/22/08
081122MS2Al
YM
1,200
Result RL
ND 1,200
ND 1,200
ND 1,200
ND 1,200
ND 1,200
ND 2.400
ND 1,200
ND 1,200
ND 2,400
ND 2,400
ND 1,200
ND 1,200
ND 1,200
ND 2,400
ND 1,200
~i~TIECHNOLOGV Laboratories, Inc.
ii
A8111904-09 A8111904-10
YEW-I ( 32) YEW-I ( 36)
ll/13/08 11/14/08
11/21/08 11/21/08
08l l21MS2AI 081121MS2Al
YM YM
1,300 1,400
Result RL Result RL
ND 1.300 ND 1,400
ND 1,300 ND 1,400
ND 1,300 ND 1,400
ND 1,300 ND 1,400
ND 1,300 ND 1,400
ND 2,700 ND 2,700
ND 1,300 ND 1.400
ND 1.300 ND 1,400
ND 2,700 ND 2,700
ND 1,700 ND 2,700
ND 1,300 ND 1,400
ND 1,300 ND 1,400
ND 1.300 ND 1,400
ND 1,700 ND 2,700
ND 1,300 ND 1,400
Date _ __,_i..,1.c.1/~,:.:./c,_o.aX: __
page 2 of 2
1R.'in1 E C:.rilP. AvP.ntJe. Suite 1.10 ♦ Citv of lndustrv. CA 91748 ♦ Ph: (626J 964-4032 ♦ Fx: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client:
Attn:
Pace Analytical
Kevin Herring
Client's Project: NSCC/Akzo Nobel Pilot Study
11
Date Received: 11/19/08
Matrix:
Units:
Air
ppbv
Lab No:
Client Sa mole I.D.:
Date Sampled:
Date AnalyzCd:
QC Batch No:
Analvst Initials:
Dilution Factor:
ANALYTE
Dichlorotlifluoromcthanc (12)
Cliloromcthane
l,2-Cl-l,l,2,2·F ethane (I 14)
Vinyl Chloride
Bromometh:mc
Chlorocth:me
richloronuoromcthanc (11)
t,J-Dichlorocthcne
Carbon Disu)fo.lc
J,1,2-CI 1,2,2-F ethane (113)
Acetone
Methylene Chloride
t-l ,2-Dichlorocthcnc
I ,J-Dichloroclhnnc
Vinyl Acetote
c-l ,2-Dichloroethcne
2-Butanone
I-Butyl Methyl Ether
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichlorocthnne
Cnrllon Tclrnchloridc
Benzene
I ,2-Dichloroelhunc
Trichlorocthcne
1,l-Dichloropropnnc
Bromodichloromcthnnc
c-i ,3-Dichloropropenc
4-Mcthyl-2-Pentanone
Toluene
I• 1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2-T richloroethanc
T etracl1lorocthenc
2-llex:mone
Dibromoc h loro mctha nc
1,2•Dibromoctlrnnc
Chlorobcnzenc
PQL
LO
2.0
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
5.0
LO
5.0
LO
LO
LO
5.0
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
EPA Method TOIS
A8111904-11 A8111904-12
VE\V-1 ( 40) VE\V-1 ( 44)
11/14/08 11/14/08 ·
11/21/08 11/21/08
081121MS2AI 081121MS2Al
VM VM
1,400 1,400
Result RL Result RL
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 2,700 ND 2,700
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
4,000 1,400 4,400 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 6,800 ND 6,800
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
8,IOO 6,800 ND 6,800
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 6,800 ND 6,800
ND 1,400 ND 1.400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1.400
240,000 1,400 260,000 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND !,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1.400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1.400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
An,·TECHNOLOGY Laboratories, Inc.
1RF.()1 ~ (7;::i/P. AvP.mJP. S11itP. 1.1n o r.itv nf lnrl11.<1lrv. CA 91748 ♦ Ph: [phone] ♦ Fx: [phone]
11
page 1 of 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client: Pace Analytical
Attn: Kevin Herring
Client's Project:
Date Received:
Matrix:
Units:
NSCC/Akzo Nobel Pilot Study
11/19/08
Air
ppbv
11 EPA Method TOIS
Lab No:
Client Sample I.D.:
Date Sainpled:
Date Analvzed:
QC Batch No:
Analvst Initials:
Dilution Factor:
ANALYTE PQL
Ethylbenzcnc 1.0
p,&m-Xylene 1.0
· o-Xylcne 1.0
Styrene 1.0
Bromoform 1.0
1, 1,2,2-Tctrnch lorocthnnc 2.0
Benzyl Chloride 1.0
4-Eth1·l Toluene 1.0
1,.3,5-Trimethylbcnzene 2.0
1,2,4-T rimelhylbcnzcne 2.0
1,3-Dichlorobcnzcnc 1.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzcnc 1.0
1,2-Dichlorobenzcne 1.0
1,2,4-Trichlorobcnzcne 2.0
llc:tnchlorobutndicne 1.0
PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit
ND= Not Detected (below RL)
RL = PQL X Dilution Factor
A8111904-11 A8111904-12
YEW-I ( 40) YEW-I ( 44)
11/14/08 11/14/08
-11/21/08 11/21/08
081121MS2AI 081121MS2AI
YM YM
1,400 1,400
Result RL Rcsull RL
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1.400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1.400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 2,700 ND 2,700
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 2.70-0 ND ),700
ND 2,700 ND 2,700
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
ND 2,700 ND 2,700
ND 1,400 ND 1,400
Reviewed/Approved By: ----1/hllff-' 11-li-M-'--_W_c _ ____,.f~ __
M":.U'.Jhnson 0
Operations Manager
The cover letter is an inlegral port of this analytical report
An~TECHNOLOGY Laboratories, Inc.
11
Date _ _,_11._,_/,-'--'/c'--'i''---
page 2 of2
1R.t;n1 ~ ~::ii,:,. A11.i:in11P S11ifP 1.'W o r.itv nf lnrl11s.ftv. (;A 91748 ♦ Ph: (626) 964•4032 ♦ Fx: (6261 964-5832
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LCS/LCSD Recovery and RPD Summary Report
QC Batch#: 081121MS2AI
Matrix: Air
EPA Method TO-14/TO-15
Lab No: Method Blank LCS LCSD
Date Analyzed: 11/21/08 11/21/08 11/21/08
Data File ID: 21NOV008.D 21NOV003.D 21NOV004.D
Analyst Initials: VM VM VM
Dilution Factor: 0.2 1.0 1.0
ANALYTE
Result Spike Result % Rec Result % Rec
ppbv Amount ppbv ppbv
1,1-Dichlorocthcnc 0.0 10.0 10.4 104 10.6 106
Methylene Ch101idc 0.0 10.0 11.3 113 11.0 110
T1ichlorocthcnc o.o 10.0 9.5 95 9.5 95
Toluene 0.0 10.0 10.0 100 10.2 102
1, 1,2,2-T et rachlorocthane 0.0 10.0 9.1 91 9.2 92
RPD = Rl?!ativc Percent DiITcrcncc
Reviewed/Approved By: -----it4h'4'-lf-~-+---' ---H-,1--
Mark Johnson t
Operations Manager
·me cover lctt~r is an integral part oflhis analytical report
~;o-TECHNOLOGY Laboratories, Inc.
Limits
RPD Low High Max.
%Rec %Rec RPD
1.9 70 130 JO
2.9 70 130 JO
0.1 70 130 JO
1.6 70 llO JO
I.I 70 130 JO
Date: _ __.le_. 1._,/_)--'/--'G-'-c\'.:,___
Pass/
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
I
LCS/LCSD Recovery and RPD Summary Report
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
QC Batch#: 081122MS2A2
Matrix: Air
Lab No: Method Blank
Date Analyzed: 11/23/08
Data FUc ID: 22NOV040.D
Analyst Initials: VM
Dilution Factor: 0.2
ANALYTE
Result
ppbv
1, 1-Dlchloroethenc 0.0
Methylene Chloride 0.0
TlichJorocthcnc 0.0
Toluene 0.0
1,1,2,2-TctrachJorocthanc 0.0
I RPD"" Relative Percent Difference
I
EPA Method T0-14/T0-15
LCS LCSD
11/22/08 11/22/08
22NOV023.D 22NOV024.D
VM VM
1.0 1.0
Spike ResuJt %Rec ResuJt %Rec RPD
Amount ppbv ppbv
10.0 9.9 99 9.9 99 0.9
10.0 10.2 102 10.0 JOO 2.1
10.0 8.9 89 8.8 88 0.7
10.0 8.9 89 9.3 93 4.8
10.0 9.9 99 9.2 92 6.6
Limits
Low High Max.
%Rec %Rec RPD
70 130 30
70 130 30
70 130 30
70 130 30
70 130 30
I Reviewed/Approved By: ______ J-11· 4ff$!1--lf--+,--·--,/-F-·---
Mark Johnson f Date: --'-1+0'--/4-'--i) _,_'f_
Operations Manager
I The cover !cUer is ill\ integral p:trt of this malytical report
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,¼.;,rTECHNOLOGV Laboratories, Inc.
Pass/
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
I
u
I
I
I
I
LCS/LCSD Recovery and RPD Summary Report
QC Batch #: 081122MS2Al
Matrix: Air
Lab No: Method Blank
Date Analyzed: 11/22/08
Data File ID: 22NOVOIJ.O
Analyst Initials: VM
Dilution Factor: 0.2
ANAL\'TE Result
ppbv
1, 1-Dichlorocthcnc 0.0
Methylene Chloride 0.0
T1ichlorocthcne 0.0
Toluene 0.0
1, 1,2,2-T ctrachlorocthanc 0.0
EPA Method TO-14ffO-15
LCS LCSO
11/22/08 11/22/08
22NOV003.0 . 22NOV004.0
VM VM
1.0 1.0
Spike Result % Rec Result %Rec
Amount ppbv ppbv RPO
10.0 10.5 105 10.7 107 1.8
10.0 11.0 110 II.I 111 0.7
10.0 9.9 99 9.9 99 0.1
10.0 10.3 103 9.9 99 4.4
10.0 9.5 95 9.8 98 3.6
Limits
Low High Max.
%Rec %Rec RPO
70 130 JO
70 130 JO
70 IJO 30
70 IJO 30
70 IJO 30
I RPD "" Relative Percent DifTcrcncC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Reviewed/Approved By: ~
Mark Joh s
Operations Manager
The ,;over \ctlcf is :in integral pm ofthi$ an.tlytical report
,UrTECHNOII..OGY Laboratories, Inc.
-1o&;M c: r.:,.,,,1° ll'1on110 .C::11ifJ:> 1.':/() • r.ifvnflnrl11s;f,v_ (;A 91748 ♦ Ph: [phone] ♦ Fx: (626J 964-5832
Pass/
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
I
I
I
I
LCS/LCSD Recovery and RPO Summary Report
QC Batch#: 081 I 24MS2A 1
Matrix: Air
Lab No: Method Blank
Date Analyzed: 11/24/08
Data File ID: 24NOV009.D
Analyst Initials: VM
Dilution Factor: 0.2
ANALYTE Result
ppbv
111-Dichloroethcnc 0.0
Methylene Chloride 0.0
Trichlorocthcnc 0.0
Toluene 0.0
1,1,2,2-Tclrachlorocthanc 0.0
EPA Method T0-14ff0-15
LCS LCSD
11/24/08 11/24/08
24NOV007.D 24NOV008.D
VM VM
1.0 1.0
Spike Result % Rec Result % Rec RPD
Amount ppbv ppbv
10.0 I I.I 111 II.I Ill 0.0
10.0 11.6 116 11.5 115 0.3
10.0 IO.I IOI IO.I IOI 0.1
10.0 IO.I IOI 10.4 104 2.7
10.0 9.7 97 9.7 97 0.4
I RPO = Relative Pl!rcent Difference
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Reviewed/Approved By: 444/,U_ ·· I
MarkJoh b
Opcrnt\ons Manager
The cover lencr is ru1 intcgntl part or this .inalytical ,eport
An.-TECHNOLOGY Laboratories, Inc.
Limits
Low High Max.
%Rec %Rec RPD
70 130 30
70 130 30
70 130 30
70 130 30
70 130 30
11Fin1 ,:::: r::::::iJ,,,. .ll""""""" .C:::11if,:, 1.1n • r:itv nf lnrl11.<:1.frv r:A 9174.R • Ph: fn?Fil 9fi4-40.'?:; • Fx: /Fi2fil 964-SR.1?.
ii
Pass/
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
I
I ARCAOIS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Appendix D
2008 Pilot Test Field Notes
- - - - - ---- -- - -
I!!!!! !!!!! !!!!I es
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Pg_l_ot ;)._
FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY
Method of Transport Sample Condition Upon Receipt ProjectName: JJSCC./Ak<o /J,,/o, / ~/,,¥·
Project#: Svf P:1ot .'.'.;~ ... .J{
Walk-In D 1.CHILLED YO NO 4.SEALED YD N 0
Courier D
I UPS D 2. HEADSPACE (VOA) YO 18501 E. Gale Avenue, Suite 130
City of Industry, CA 91748
626-964-4032 • Fax: [phone] P.O. #: /3oo b <JO 13. (X)OO, OD 00 'f FedEx D
ATL · D 3. CONTAINER INTACT Y 0
Company: L ff</ l',u ,.., ,:,
Contact: {3, uc, Re; 1/ ,1
Sampled/Relinquished by: (S~ fM Prlnlld Name)
-,, 7.:_ -::t, _,/ f.f,.-.~ , ,,.,6/J ...
ReUnqulshed by:~ •rd Pr1n1ac1 Nam.I '
ReRnqulshed by: (Sl;n,tin •nd Pnntlld liarnal
I hereby authorize ATL to perform the work
Indicated below:
Date:
/1-1</-0'8
Date:
Date:
Send Report To:
Attn· {3,.xe {?< ,11{ J
(3,;,,.,, / 0 ,/?,-~ fl•lj.t'? Co: LFR
Address:
City Hoor<~ vilk State r,J<:_ Zip Code i}tJ'I I 7
Time: Received by: (SlgrwlUrll and Prirl!ld Name)
Time: Received by: (Signatln ■nd Pl'irflld NMMJ
Time: Received by: (Slgna!ure.nd Prlnled Name)
BIii To: Special Instructions/Comments:
Attn: ___ ~5,,;;.::•c,""="-~----
Co: ____________ I
NO 5.1 OF SPLS MATCH COC YO NO
NO 6. PRESERVED YO NO
TEL: ( 7oo/ )rfJ-'>5"/J.
FAX:( 70'{ ) 7'i'f Of,'{3
Date: Time:
Date: Time:
Date: Time:
ProjectMgrJSubmltter1PrlntName) Oat• Address Jt1 Cta"l,., ('Jru:.-Address ___________
1 ---:. ---~~~~~~~====r=;:~~:;l,,.-,-------,-,~,------,-,==1 s ::....,. Cltv Mo,u.:, 11,·1k State l'-1< Zlo.2.a!!7 City State Zip
req~::t:~:~t::;les □~ LaOtplehboeAr~_to_ry_s_ta_nda_•_:_''------------11 ~e~:~) .o;~ o~syY....,:~ ,§') /c_,_C-IR_c_L...cEM.::;\.::;p~:.:.R:;::l~.;.P_R_IA_TE_ ~ DEU:~~~ES
win be disposed 14 days -,._-, .<>t ..s; ., v i~ j:: LEVEL ID 0
after reporting or □ Return To: ~ ~ ~ i:!l ...J~ 'b & r{1 C ;;-, < LEVEL IV □
at Lab's discretion. * $10.00 FEE PER HAZARDOUS SAMPLE DISPOSAL. ~ (J o, J' f; .... ~ ~ J' c., ;;;0 / Co Jf > ,t:'0'Jr.Jo,CJ~Q~·~-~-,# ~~J S:f ;f cc _____ , ,:::: ~ §J ,_0 ~ ~ ~ l;:; §' ....., Q.o ~ ...., ~ ?! w
LAB USE ONL y Sample Description ~ §' £' '5' df ,;?f ~ K' · .:,.'t 8° If:' ~ • o t cl' "' S/N d! :f <!1', ~ ., 'o .. ,./J :,,; ;:., L... . 0 §,) /ii .!:? 0'<>~/,) ' --~ ccw I =====I ~~~~~~~ u.~~~ ~~~-= r r
1---L_a_b_N_o_. --~-----s_a_m,.:.p_le_l.D_. -----l-D_at_e+T_i_m_e-lF-"':::"'r'~+-"'.;"'f-·:,,;:..:0Ff?~~¥-":,'tf'. -~-<v,;:~f . .:l~[.f·:..:<:i::;"~~f-+--+-f...:-i'~~"4-~~;l~'(~'°~OR-&~o=f-:..TA:..i+.:#:...+T:2y~pe::i--:o.:+-R:..E:..M:..'1:..R:..K:..:.:S-1
vEw-1 (,) 11-e-o21 13i< ✓
• TAT starts 8 a.m. following day If
samples received after S p.m.
TAT. A-j Overnight I · -,; 24 hr I
BJ Emergency '7 Next workda1 I Critical / C= 12 Workdavs
Container Types: B-Tedlar Bag C-Canister V VOA O Other
Urgent 0= 3 Workdavs
nt~TAl~I JTION• WhltA wtth rAnnrt VAllnw tn fnlrtAr Pin.,. tn c:11hmltta"
(Routine
E=/7 Workdavs
Preservatives:
H=Hcl N=None
<t.."70
----·-- -- ----I!!!! l!!!!S ==
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Pg___d__of ;i....
Project Name: ,N.SCC. //11<"2<> lv,lo,J LI ' FOR LABORATORY USE ONLY
flitt~a~o~~,~~~~GY
>, ,-;,IJJ•/. ' Method of Transport Sample Condition Upon Recaipl I Walk-in □ 1. CHILLED YO NO 4. SEALED YON □ :;v£ f? lof s+~,ti-: Courier □ 1850 I E. Gale A venue, Suite 130 · Project#: l UPS □ 2. HEADSPACE (VOA) Y □ NO 5. # OF SPLS MATCH COC YD N □ 'City of Industry, CA 91748
(3oo{;j:)Ol3.oooo. ooooLl FedEx □ 626-964-4032 • Fax: [phone] P.O.#: ATL □ 3. CONTAINER INTACT Y 0 NO 6. PRESERVED YON 0
Company: I.. F'KI Ar,-.,, .•. :. Address: 113 cw.-+•--p1,.,c.-TEL: ( 70-/ l7,;J-,;-,S-'1'J-
Contact: (3 ,,,, C e< ; II ,I c11y 1-f~cu$ 11;Jk State k/(._ Zip Code Ji?i/7 FAX:( 70-{ l79')-06'{.]'
Sampledffi!,llnqulshed by: .178 ~ Pnnd Name) Date: Time: Received by: {Signltln and Print.:! Mama) Date: nme: --# ,J:._ ·----=<: _ ~""' l..o.f']r ✓,,... I I -1"( · <Yi!
. Rellnqufshed by: I~ and Plinl.d NMwJ Date: Time: Received by: 1s1;1111tur. -i Pm«f rum.1 Date: Time:
Rellnqulshed by: (Slgnatur••ndPrlnl.tName) Date: Time: Received by: t~ enc1 Pm.t Nam.) Date: Time:
I hereby authorize ATL to perlonn the work Send Repon To: Bill To: Special Instructions/Comments: Indicated below. Attn: 8,-..,,, R~; 11 ✓ Attn: S, .. ._
{3(; • .,,,, L..o"t''"" /l-1+oy Co: LFR I
Co:
Protect Mgr./Submltter ~me} Date Address 113 c~,,i.,. e,1,,,,,,. Address ,.. ./ '5.
City M~.rc.!,tJillc: State,-J,:. 71n ,3' I 7 ...... Clly State Z,p
Unless otherwise Sample Archlve/Dlsposal: Clrde or Add i . I CIRCLE APPROPRIATE DEUVERABLES
requested, afl samples □ Laboratory Standard Analysls(es) 6; ..s, i;-MATRIX z EDD □ will be disposed 14 days □ Other Requested jf ~...., ff 6; c, ~ s1/. 0
Return To·: s ~ -%'...., &f';j (!j ;:: LEVELm □ after reporting or □ ~ -.s-o-0S<o ~B, .:§i ~ < LEVELIV □ at Lab's discretion. • $10.00 FEE PER HAZARDOUS SAMPLE DISPOSAL. ,X ~ bJ:S,~(J C!i;f ~ • Jf > 1.t; 0 "q b ... ooer.~ 9:-~(§ ~ ~ ;f a: tj-0 ~ 0 ~ pq Q~;_/'~<f <:to~....,~~ ;! w LAB USE ONLY Sample Description i /f ;-0 .,P0
,/ {? rl o'',,rff {Ro!~ .:,."<' ~ ii:' ~ • a'~ cl' en
(j'l;" "" <ol>;J, ,l:-•O~J!}~;Oiii w
Lab No. Sample 1.0. Date nme !'>!'>!'> ...... ~'!::'If ""-Oj0 .$' # ✓. ~"<:' ~ ci/oif.TAT # Type er REMARKS ~ A..c::, A..c::, A..o A..o ~ ~ II: rt:51/(/ o""' ~ Q.
Vcw-1 (;>•-IJ ,,~,:'.;.\l':3 f:l.lf' ✓ c;'-(7-z
VE'vJ-/ (.;i8') 11-1101 11,,S' ✓ 7/.')S-'
V£.vJ-I ( 3~) ,1.1J.03' ~01$' ✓ 5--IIS-
Vfw-I (36) Jl-;f~ f.)01~ / t '-1'-f.J
VE w-1 ( &./OJ ,i.,1,J) o>/1f ✓ l3bb
VE0-/ ( '1'-i) 11-1'(.~ 0315° I ✓ It/ 7'i
.
TAT· A~IOvemightl 1~ Emergency , I Critical I D= Urgent ./ ,!:Routine Preservatives: • TAT starts 8 e.m. following day It • -,; 24 hr B Next workda~ C= 2 Workdays 3 Workdavs E= 7 Workdavs samples received after 5 p.m.
V=VOA 0= Other H=Hcl N=None Container Types: B-T edlar Bag C=Canister
nlOTOIDI IT'll"\11.1. un.r.-. •• ~ ----.... V-11-•o• "'-.1-1.J---·-·• .. _ •.. L ....
/ i
Project/ Clienl sv.e: A/of 9.7
5v£ S:d v('
Date J/-1,J·olf Location ~ f,-,b,.,; (I/~ Date If -I} :08'
I'
Project/ Client f> VE R,· I o.f S h,;r,=
-------Ly;J:.~1';;=:~;v.,_--~~.----: i _ _ w~ .. ~~~: J:lo_., '!-__ 6_p::
~ I~---·-•----·-·· .. -· . ·-·····-·-··--·-·--··
· •---~'loo_ ~-wk _ -"'-~J_ ,_J;_...,_ 5--Coo,P,t,,ec_-~:__-
. A-:~J. -·····-o...._ _;J,_!An . J: __ ~,,_ ..
.. ... o~J_ -Sq~'r--;__s_,:_'!L~ ..,_,~-f_h ___ -""~cS>---
IOQp_ ____ fJr9t'.,.,_: cl-"f-_/)_{ _
_____ ____ __ 1,v,·1 L_ b,,;y--__ w:J,·
---+-'-"' .. y. -Iv,·,
--l----+----1----
l.S)10 ___ (3 wl.-_ fo __ s
--_,(_(!.,__.,._ JQ_r __
JO'iS°: ~I,~-_f.I__,L_/.'~~•-!'.T--"~'=+~=~-
_LJ_IS_ __ B~,, k ___ ~ _ __ .f.r,.,~. -
---..... -{3f p_!4-!_ ---b __ .:ti) --J,_. !lf-of-• .
______ _ ___ t,, J~_g_ A ... , .. ~s _{j o --P==--"1+' '.!'..Jl"'• '.\cl_ .
... --·------·-·----------··--·--·-----L----
·•·-. P°"'.l-0::= /"1,:.,;_R" _ol_o!;l~-------1---
. ----·--· ----·--+--
··· ···---------------1----+-----I ----
------I!!!!!!!! !!!! I!!!!!! == == mil ;;;; &ii lllill -
Locatioo ~ (,-!. l,v••f c r'<-•
117 · ..
Date f( -f ;-cp;
Project/Client j,.;,;: (':fo+ {f:7
C c:."·Y-·
)l O _ ::Lr'-'!'• s--l--+----+--l--l--1-
~1~0 ,., 5 -=1 ---l-........;C----+--l--___,______,_
!
5. a)-.. ~,_,_3 15
. I .....-!-----!-----'~ ! _____ ,-+-+----I-
I .• )_5U ~.....-~"'-~...JU---~1· :Ir··-----,--... ····---···
l---f-+-+---+-aL--!----f-+---t----1------f-----:-1··· J ..... -···-· -········
~;!!,cl __ l_J] (1/Qe_b__, -~-J.J _°fJ ~-I __ · _ _JJ ~-!! :;;J-\ ,, 1 ' «cl t ,, -~-~-\\
fWff --~;/---~!>}
';~y~· .. fft~f-;~=:~
I,,,::1:·
-j:::.·
'
Date 11 • ll •O!i' ~ ·
\1-IJ·or .
Location S,.f;,.(..,"f , I{.( . Date 11 • 13 · 08
Project/Client 5V£ PilJ: St.,Jy &M,>ijs
µ<.<•1-'<--l--+-...Lf-' ·--.L---i--+----+-l----l-----l-1
0 10
F;~o .
' :n Location
" ' Project/ Client
- - - - - - - - - - -I!!!!!!!! I!!!!! ~ I!!!!! ~ !!!!!I I!!!!! em
~~ . . .
· Location 5a/,sku11(, N-C. Date 11-13 ·011 #.t;iJ
• Project/Client ,5VG: 131.f-Sk,Jy &,Ji,,Jj 11-l'l-o_r .
13/o,,,r ~,•d"} ⇒ · .
. Location .5,ilislzv"j l/. C • Date 11-14 cog
Project/ Client s V £,_ J'i lo± I< s\-l<t:,001~,:rs
R,..J,·.., s . ····-···-·····-··· ··--···--· ·-1 · · -· ._;w ···-~ '°F ·G
. ,':: ~J{ ~,~ ~c..: __ ·.•
' lJJ..Q..__ _ _=t_. f,q_ _ ........ ·-.. _ .. __ I 3G. --+r!
1s10 ..... ]._$........ l~k .... 1 ____ -+-'~-~~
J, 5 . . --···· . _ I 3 I?. _ (./! ~ '
."'4"!!iZ.J-.-1-•~~--J.,~4'!'-I--+-+-+-+--+ •-l--+--a vrri 'i
~V-""'I--...JY.!"M'.j..5~-'+'..'...!:+'--l---l--l-/--j .---1--1--1--1
Vrrirl..
7~5 __ -· 131? +5 '
~---1 -:;-. s .... J?~···-··---...... 7-2:_ _____ ..
l'I iO '":f,.1:!. .. _ I 3't 'i!3 ----+-
. )OJO 7-. (, .......... ···-········· . L~~ .. -1--•--l-----t
li-=~'-f __ l 0_-+_,. (,, ····-···-······ 3<,····•·· ·····---···--·+·'-~-~
:$8 ----:;.--:,. .~ 13'&'
H=-'-----1 '".:f,~_ -···-(3l, . ··-·---.J..Ll...._ __ l
. 00IO _7_,7 __ -·-·· ... ["38 ___ -------1-•~--
o 110 ......... 7d7 -··--· L'.3'---l---+~-=---
7,2 .. ·····-·-_'3..b,~+-----+-8 .. ~3 __ -'•
~"-=-l-7'--'--~7 .. _. ·-···· _l_,,'3c..::-b_-l-----l•,.=~e<._-~·-~:.
1 D11 IO ,"2--1----H'""i-..+--~
; 0$10 ___ .7 ,7 -· ·-·--··· ._.JJ 8__,__ ~~
I o<,10 .. 7.cJ, ___ ,____-+[3·,,,_h_+---·-+ti=o=----
1 O~\O 7_._7_ __ 1-_ -.3_b,_+--__ ~ I
~O'BIO. 7.J -·-····--L"3l_._, __ -+-Q,""---j ; ™ --+-·············-\ .... ---+----~t
- - - --,--
Location S .. l,·t,~,.,. r, /JC.
Project/ Client Sv~·lot
I
- - - -
;
Date l l-1'1 · ~'8. ,
1)".j..,,Jf /µ,5cc._ .·/
··i. I
i
. i
! i
... ··; . ----···"
l i--.
'
! ··--••·-I ...
I i; ···r----·---,
. ···-· ______ .,,
------ -
l!!!!!!I
125 ;_
Location· Date
Project I Client
l-+---+---+-l-+---+---+-1-+----+---t-+-. ----------
1-+---l---+-+---+--+-+--+---+-+--➔·-----------------.
l--+--+--+---t-+--+--+---t-+--+---t-1--·-. ---····· ..... .
+--+---+-+--+--+-+--➔-···· .... --,------··· ----
1---l----l---+-+---i--+-+--+---+-+--t· ---· -····· .... -·-····· ...... .
; >---+--+---+-+--+--+-t----t---+-t----t-----t··--------------···
l-+-+-1.---t1---+--t--+--lf-+--+----+-t--+----t···-· --
1-+---+--+-+---+---+-+---+---+-+--+----t-··· --··-·--····
1-+--+----t-+---+---+-+--+----t--i---·-------··-·
1-+---+---t-+--+---+-+--+---t-+--+----t----i·. . ... ----···
l!!!!!!!I I!!!!!