NCD986175644_20050501_Davis Park Road TCE Site_FRBCERCLA LTAR_LTAR Feb 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Document Control No. RFW205-2A-ATJK
Revision 0
LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION
FEBRUARY 2005 SEMIANNUAL
SAMPLING EVENT REPORT
DA VIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
GASTONIA, NORTH CAROLINA
Work Assignment No. 205-RALR-04PN
MAY 2005
REGION 5
U.S. EPA CONTRACT NO. 68-W7-0026
Weston Solutions, Inc.
Suite 100
5430 Metric Place
Norcross, Georgia 30092
WESTON W.O. No. 20064.205.IO0.0JIO
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions. Inc., expressly for EPA. 1t shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
Section
2
3
4
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: Table of Contents
Revision: 0
Date: May 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1-1
I. I
1.2
1.3
Purpose ..................................................................................................... 1-1
Background .............................................................................................. 1-I
Groundwater Contaminant Description ................................................... 1-3
1.3.1 Contaminant Source Arca .................................................................. 1-6
1.3.2 Groundwater Plume Concentration and Extent .................................. 1-8
1.4 Site Geology and 1-lydrogeology .............................................................. 1-9
LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION .............................................................. 2-I
2.1 Quarterly and Semiannual Groundwater Monitoring .............................. 2-2
2.2 First Year Quanerly L TRA Sampling Events (2002/2003) ..................... 2-5
2.3 Semiannual L TRA Sampling Events (August 2003/t'cbruary
2004/ August 2004) ................................................................................... 2-7
FEBRUARY 2005 LTRA SUMMARY ............................................................. 3-I
3.1 Groundwater Sampling ............................................................................ 3-I
3.2
3.3
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
Monitor Well Sampling Procedures ................................................... 3-I
Community and Private Well Sampling Procedures .......................... 3-3
Field Quality Assurance/Quality Control Samples ............................ 3-3
Groundwater Elevation ............................................................................ 3-4
Groundwater Analytical Results .............................................................. 3-8
3.3.1 Groundwater Samples ........................................................................ 3-8
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................... 4-1
4.1
4.2
4.3
L TRA Results Summary .......................................................................... 4-I
Conclusions ............................................................................................. .4-7
Recommendations ................................................................................. .4-10
K:\20064\205\Second semiannual 3rd yoar\Feb05Sem1annualRpt.doc RFW205-2A-AT JK
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
Figure
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
1-5
2-1
3-1
3-2
3-3
4-1
4-2
4-3
4-4
4-5
4-6
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: Table of Contents
Revision: 0
Date: May 2004
LIST OF FIGURES
Title Page
Site Map ................................................................................................................ 1-2
Residences Connected to City Water, September 2000 ....................................... 1-4
Residences Supplied with Carbon Filtration Units, August 2000 ........................ 1-5
Street Address Location Map ........................................... . ...... 1-7
Water Supply Sources Following RA ................................................................ 1-I 0
LTRA Monitor Well Sampling Nctwork ............... : .............................................. 2-3
Potentiometric Contour Map, Bedrock Aquifer February 2004 ........................... 3-7
TCE Concentrations in Groundwater Fehruary 2005 ......................................... 3-26
PCE Concentrations in Groundwater February 2005 ......................................... 3-27
Trichloroethene Concentration vs. Time, 2419 Davis Park Road, MW-5 .......... .4-2
Trichloroethcnc Concentration vs. Time, 2403 Davis Park Road, MW-14 ........ .4-3
Trichloroethcne and Tetrachloroethene Concentration vs. Time, 2719 Davis
Park Road, MW-12 .............................................................................................. .4-4
Trichloroethenc and Tctrachlorocthenc Concentration vs. Time, 2232 Tate
Street, MW-15 ..................................................................................................... .4-6
Trichlorocthenc and Tetrachloroethenc Concentration vs. Time, 2639
Springbrook Street, MW-9 .................................................................................. .4-8
Trichloroethene and Tetrachloroethene Concentration vs. Time, 2800 Davis
Park Road, MW-I 8 .............................................................................................. .4-9
K:\20064\205\Second semiannual 3rd year\Feb05Semiannu.i1Rpl.doc II RFW205·2A·AT JK
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
Table
1-1
2-1
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-4
4-1
LIST OF TABLES
Title
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: Table of Contents
Revision: O
Date: Aprll 2005
Residential Well Historical Analytical Results .................................................. 1-I I
LTRA Monitor Well Sampling Network .............................................................. 2-4
Passive Diffusion Bag Sampler Placement .......................................................... 3-2
February 2004 Sc1niannual LTRA QA/QC Laboratory Analytical Results
Su 111 mary ............................................................................................................... 3-5
February 2004 Semiannual LTRA Groundwater Level Data ............................... 3-6
LTRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary, April, September, December
2002, March, August 2003, February, August 2004, and February 2005 ............ 3-9
Monitor Well Physical Conditions .................................................................... .4-I I
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A -Log Notes/Field Water Quality Data Sheets
APPENDIX B -Laboratory Analytical Reports
K:\2006~\205\Second semiannual 3rd year\Feb0~SemiannualRpt.dor, Ill RFW205·2A·AT JK
'. I·.,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
I.I PURPOSE
SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 1
Revision: O
Date: May 2005
Weston Solutions, Inc., (WESTON@) has been tasked hy the U.S. Envirnnlllclllal Prntcction
Agency (EPA) Region 4 10 pcrfor111 the Long Tenn Response Action (L TRA) al the Davis Park
Road Trichloroethenc (TCE) Site in Gastonia, North Carolina. The work is conducted under the
Region 5 Re111edial Action Contract (RAC) Program and implemented as a contract crossover to
Region 4, Contract Number 68-W7-0026, Work Assignment Number 205-RALR-04PN. The
current L TRA includes monitoring the bedrock aquifer contaminant plume by sampling a
network of bedrock wells for volatile organic co111pounds (YOCs) on a quarterly basis for one
year, semiannually for two years, and annually thereafter for 27 years, pending review of
analytical results, to ensure the plume is in fact naturally attenuating.
1.2 BACKGROUND
The Davis Park Road TCE Site is located within the Gastonia Extra Territorial Jurisdiction area
along Davis Park Road, south of Hudson Boulevard and north of Blackwood Creek in the
southwestern portion of Gastonia, Gaston County. North Carolina. The site consists of an area of
reportedly contaminated soil behind a building that is located at 2307 Davis Park Road (Davis
Park Auto Repair), and a plume of contaminated groundwater that emanates from this property
and extends south along Davis Park Road to Blackwood Creek. The site also includes the Cedar
Oak Park subdivision located on the cast side of Davis Park Road within the confines of Cedar
Oak Circle as well as areas along the western side of Davis Park Road. Figure .1-1 presents a site
map for the Davis Park Road TCE Site.
K;\20064\205\Second semiannual 3rd year\Feb05Semiannua1Rp1.doc 1-I RFW205-2A-AT JK
-
rr ~
! z
~ ~
-
[')
-----
0
[J
------
'i::> 0
/,....""'-'----"'=e!'"'oo"'-""'"~"--"""""''-----
(J "v d CJ DD D o"·
RICHLAND AVENUE
PARK \J AUTQ-, □ 0 ~ 0 = @EPAtfr GLENRAVEN AVENUE Cl
-
□ □ □ ao tJ 0
0
0
[]
0
l Ilg
□•
0
\1G ,, ,, ,, ,,
;\t::::i
0"
FIGURE 1 ° O ,=--'==◊=·=□= 0
SITE MA~□□ D
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
0
-
D
--
□
0
Approximate
Scale In Feet
-
I ~ ._ _______________________________________ ..'.o:'._ ___ _:e~o~o ____ 21:20~0:J GASTONIA, NORTH CAROLINA
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 1
Revision: O
Date: May 2005
The plume of contaminated groundwater underlies residential areas along the plume's entire
horizontal extent. The contaminant levels and aerial extent arc further described in Section 1.3.2.
At the time of the discovery of contaminants in the groundwater (March 1990), a majority of the
residences throughout the site were supplied water by residential water supply wells. As a result
of the continued migration of the plume, groundwater supplying many of these residential water
wells became contaminated with the chlorinated hydrocarbons found in the plume. Since that
time. several neighborhoods within the site have been connected to the Gastonia public water
supply to reduce the potential health threat from the contaminants. In 1996. many of the houses
within the Hedgewood Circle neighborhood, which borders the northern edge of the site, were
connected to the public water supply. In late 1997 and early 1998, after petitioning the city for
water services, all of the homes in the Ce'dar Oak Circle subdivision, which dominates the
eastern side of the site, were connected to the public water supply. Approximately 130 homes
within the site were receiving water from residential water supply wells prior to Remedial Action
(RA) activities. Over half of these homes (approximately 75) had water supply wells that were
or could potentially be affected by the contaminant plume as depicted in the 1998. Remedial
Investigation (RI) report. In August 2000, five of these residences were supplied with carbon
filtration units, and in September 2000, sixty-four (64) of the residences were connected to the
Gastonia public water supply as part of the RA to execute the provisions of the Record of
Decision (ROD) for the site. The locations of the residences connected to the Gastonia public
water supply and the carbon filtration units arc presented in Figures 1-2 and 1-3, respectively.
1.3 GROUNDWATER CONTAMINANT DESCRIPTION
This section describes the potential source area of the contamination, current knowledge of the
groundwater plume, and the extent of the plume.
K:\20064\205\Second seminnnual 3rd year\Feb05Semiannua1Rp1.doc 1-3 RFW205-2A-AT JK
-
,r
\.
- -
0
<} I:::) a o a
D O a
0 0
0 0
0
(] 0
'u (/
--
0
{J
DAVIS PARK ROAD
- -
{J
0
{)
CJ O Cl
0 CJ CJ
~o /j. 0
0 CJ ~,,,, ~
\]
IJ' 0 0
" I a D
0
1 0
I
[J"
- - - -- -
0 00 c::::i O 'i]
Q 0
t;
~ I;; PURITAN ST. c:,
~ ~
la ~ a t; ~ z JO <
¢
Q
□ w 2 " 0 ◊ oo !
D D I <:::>
□ D ◊
0
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
GASTONIA, GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
RESIDENCES CONNECTED TO CITY WATER SEPTEMBER 2000
FIGURE 1-2
- - -----r
LEGEND
RESIDENCE
RESIDDICE CONNECTED TO OTY WATER SEPT. 2000
~JWJ!~l "
DRAWN: DATE: W.O. NO.:
J. MILLER 2/12/01 20064-138-100-0930
DES. ENG.: DATE: CAD NAME:
fie 1 2.dwa ./
------------------_.,..
IJ O t;;:l LEGEND
o. 0 \s CJ RESIDENCE
RESIDENCE SUPPLIED 1M1H CARBON FlLTRATION UNITS
Cl Cl t:J C:,
0
t::::, 0
0 t:J □
0 6C:io
DAVIS PARK ROAD
c:i a □
DAVIS PARK ROAD
Oo If 0
I ¾ J
0 0 CJ
t:::::,
CJ 0 Ooo
Q 0
J,
CJ lo
[j <:J (;::) 0 a
0 a a Q 0
0 0 oi oO D
Of 0 a " w 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0
(l 0
~ <?
~
D
I
D
~ D w ~ ~ 0 ◊
0 □• l ~ 0
13 □ i <::> • •
0
c;
<?
~
0 <:, [?"
0 □ ◊
Q C
/
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE ~ ... GASTONIA, GASTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
RESIDENCES SUPPLIED WITH CARBON FILTRATION UNITS DRAWN: DATE: W.O. NO.:
AUGUST 2000 J. MILLER 2/12/01 20064-138-100-0930
DES. ENG.: DATE: CAD NAME:
' FIGURE 1 3 fig 1 2.dwg
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, lnc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
1.3.1 Contaminant Source Area
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 1
Revision: 0
Date: May 2005
According to preliminary site investigation reports (sec RI Report, I 998, for summary), a
groundwater sample was collected on 31 March 1990 from a supply well within the Cedar Oak
Park subdivision by Gaston County Environmental Health representatives as part of a routine
sampling procedure in accordance with "Community Well Rules." Analysis of the sample
revealed concen1ra1ions ofTCE (34.9 micrograms per lilcr lµg/11), lc\rachluroclhcne (PCE) (21.7
µg/1), and chloroform (9.2 µg/1). Analytical results for a confirma1ion sample collected from this
well on I 7 April 1990 were similar to the original sample. Groundwater samples collected from
three nearby private wells in May 1990 by the Gaston County Health Departmcnl indicated !hat
the groundwater was contaminated with TCE. The highest concentration of TCE (IO 1.4 µg/1)
was detected in a sample collected from the private well located at 2419 Davis Park Road (sec
Figure 1-4), 200 feet south of the Davis Park Auto Repair facility (located at 2307 Davis Park
Road). The current EPA Drinking Water Maximum Contaminanl Level (MCL) for TCE and
PCE is 5 µg/1. Current State (North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
[NCDENR]) MC Ls for TCE and PCE arc 2.8 ~tg/1 and 0.7 µg/1 respectively.
The Environmental Services Division or EPA collected groundwater samples from the
contaminated wells along Davis Park Road and within the Cedar Oak Park subdivision in July
1990. TCE was detected at concentrations of 82 ftg/1 and 31 ftg/1 in groundwater sampled from
the private well located at 2419 Davis Park Road and a Cedar Oak Park subdivision well (2719
Davis Park Road), respectively.
Additional investigations and groundwater sampling events pnor to the initiation or the RI
continued to reveal levels of contaminants above State and Federal drinking water standards.
Investigation activities focused on a possible source location(s). Several potential sources of the
K:\20064\205\Second semiannual 3rd year\Feb0SSemiannualRpt.doc 1-6 RFW205-2A-AT JK
-
~
§]
~ ~ z ~ ;,
I
- - - -
[)--
FIGURE 1-4
STREET ADDRESS LOCATION MAP
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
GASTONIA, NORTH CAROLINA
- - -
0
0 0
◊
- -
0
<:>°
" ,,
" ,, ,, ,,
,,
r: □ ,,o
11407
" 29'J9Sp
tewif,svsie,£'
II ~
n !n " ~ " ~ II g;;
II ~
// [
0 " • 2415 S"t'fl'ld
0
0
0
0
'g
0 • c18 0 □~
A
- - -
DD Dao t;i □
\1G 0
0
,,
□
,, ,,
0 ,,
,, 1 ~ 2833 o,wis Park
ooo ',
0 D DD 2837 Davrs Park
□ 0
- -
0
--
D
Approximate
Scale In Feet
600
-
1200 ~--------------------------------------------------------------------------'
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. 11 shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Slte
Section: 1
Revision: 0
Date: May 2005
contamination at the Davis Park Road TCE Site were reviewed. Consideration of proximity,
regional and local groundwater !low directions, and groundwater sample analytical data
indicated that the Davis Park Road Auto Repair facility was the most likely contaminant source
at the Davis Park Road TCE Site (NCDENR Site Inspection. 1993).
As a result of these findings and iii an effort to further define the source area for the water supply
well conlaminants. environmental assessments were conductcdi including the Site Inspection
Addendum (SI) (May 1993), Expanded Site Investigation (ES!) (May 1994), and RI (1996-
1998). The RI report summari1/.es the source investigation as follows: " ... according to data
generated from this and previous investigations, solvents such as PCE or TCE were introduced to
the environment from the property at 2307 Davis Park Road. This 'spill' migrated through the
vadosc zone and the saprolitc/partially weathered rock aquifer, and into the bedrock aquifer.
Once introduced into the environment, various biophysiochemical processes acted on the
contaminants to reduce the overall concentration as well as spread the contaminant mass
throughout various. matrices. Currently, the YOC contaminants, principally TCE and PCE,
appear to be present only within the bedrock aquifer and may continue to be drawn towards
active residential wells scattered throughout the site, specifically those wells to the west of Davis
Park Road."
1.3.2 Groundwater Plume Concentration and Extent
Five potential sources for water supply were identified in the Davis Park Road Area and
presented in the RI report. These include the following: City of Gastonia Public Water Supply
System; City or Gastonia Restricted Use Water Linc; water supply well as part of a Community
Water System; a water supply well as part of a Private Well System, and private water supply
wells. Nine monitoring wells were installed during completion or the RI (MW-IS, MW-ID,
MW-2S, MW-2D, MW-3S, MW-3D, MW-4S, MW-4D, and MW-5S). Following connection to
K:\20064\205\Second se111iannual 31d year\Feb05Semiann11alAp1 doc 1-8 RFW205-2A-AT JK
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 1
Revision: O
Date: May 2005
City Water in August 2000, seventeen private wells were abandoned, seven wells were converted
into monitoring wells (CW-I through CW-7), and five residences were supplied with carbon
filtration units (2400 Skyland, 2419 Davis Park Road, 2717 Davis Park Road, 2839 Davis Park
Road, and 2639 Springbrook). Figure 1-5 details the locations and water supply source of
residences within the vicinity of the Davis Park Road TCE Site updated to include activities
completed as part of the 1998 RI and as part of the 2001 RA to execute the provisions of the
ROD for the site. A sum1nary of analytical clata for the primary constituents of concern (PCE and
TCE) detected in groundwater sampled at the Davis Park Road TCE Site is presented in Table I-
I. Analytical data was obtained for groundwater sampled after August 200 I from the 5
residences supplied with carbon filtration units as part of the RA 10 execute the provisions of the
ROD. This data is included for PCE and TCE in Table 1-1. As descrihed in the 1998 RI, the
contaminant plume was centered along Davis Park Road from Glenraven to Blackwood Creek
and underlies areas approximately 500 feet to the cast and west of Davis Park Road.
1.4 SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
The geologic profile across the site generally consists of a saprolitc layer, underlain by a partially
weathered rock zone and the underlying fractured crystalline bedrock. The saprolitc is a silty,
clay-rich, residual material derived from in-place weathering of rock. The saprolitc zone appears
to he thickest (approximately 80 feet) near the ridge crest along the northern edge of the site,
thinning towards the lower elevations or stream valleys to approximately 20 feet in thickness. A
partially weathered rock layer typically underlies the saprolite, and ranges in thickness from
approximately 5 to 25 feet. This layer is composed of saprolite and fragments of weathered
bedrock. The bedrock is generally observed to be a fractured quartz biotite granite or granitic
gneiss.
K:\2006412051Second semiannual 3rd year\Feb05SemiarmuaIRpt.doc 1-9 RFW205-2A-AT JK
• •
0
• --• I
I ENNY -,,,. ••
I ·~ •• II ♦ □• \1
I I 0 ~ -\:,)
l::.:.J \I Cl .®
c:i®\
' '1
' '
I ci ■----+---+-------------1
APRVD. DA TE: REVISION
0 • -0 G C> ◊ ◊ 0 <:> \) <:> <:> \)
\
\) \\ ® \
o ·~□ L' i.:, -•--; D wi ,.~ LJ ·..-· SPR1N08ROOK STREET
Ill
'']
\®'
._::;· ~/
.-.;;,;~
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
GASTONIA, GASTON COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
WATER SUPPLY SOURCES
FOLLOWING RA
FIGURE 1-5
♦
.-
a
• n
~ I ;
z ! ~ . < ~ C m
i m
0
--
DRAWN: DATE:
J. MILLER 6/5/02
0 -
~ '' I •
\
8 S! n
~
3"1~ ml0::1.Ll:l'l'H
. ,;. --
D I I D [ ;
• • • • • • m m m m m m 00 00 00 00 00 00 " " " " " " m m m m m m z z z z z z 0 0 n 0 0 0 m m m m m m " " " " " " ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 n z ~ ' ' ~ • r n • • m z
~ ; " m rn ~ ,I n • " G) m C " m 0 z 0 rn z ! ~ ~ ~ " ~ 0 0 z i ~ C n 0 " " ~ ~ r m
" G ~ ~ 0 " ' m z • 0 " C • m ~ • • z " r a " " " • " ~ " C n m " § " C m 0 00 m ~ £ m ~ m ~ m ~ • 0 00 z "
W.0. NO.:
20064-138-100-0930
LAYOUT:
2-1
CADD FILE: SHEET: OF
wa\ersupply.dw 1 1
.J
-- - -- -- - - - --This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc. expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA.
Address
Date
PCE
TCE
Address
Date
PCE
TCE
Oo<o
PCE --
ID
Screen
Date
PCE
TCE
2501 Briaroak
6/14/90
ND
ND
2302 Hedgewood
5/7/96
.66AJ
ND
2618 Puritan
4/27/90
ND
ND
MW-1S
20-30
1/13/98
ND
ND
2510 Briar Oak
5/6/96
ND
ND
2314 Hedgewood
1/14/98
ND
ND
2612 Puritan
5/7/96
ND
ND
MW-1D
40-75
1/13/98
ND
ND
Address 2329 Skyland
Date
PCE
ICE
Address
Date
PCE
TCE
J · Estimated Value
A -Average Value
ND = not detected
7/10/90 5/7/96
trace ND
trace 18A
2407 Skyland
4/27/90 5fi/96
ND ND
ND 2.6A
All results reported in micrograms per liter
2241 Cedar Oak
6/9/92 5/7 /96
1K
ND
ND
ND
Table 1-1
Residential Well Historical Analytical Results
Davis Park Road TCE Site
2326 Cricket
5/7/96
ND
ND
148 Grassy
5/7/96
ND
ND
2322 Hedgewood 2347 Hedgewood 2363 Hedgewood 2375 Hedgewood 1511 Jackson
5/7/96 6/14/90 5/7/96 6/27/91 1/13/98 5/6/96
ND ND ND 1.1 ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND 0.97AJ
.
2704 Puritan 2720 Puritan 2725 Puritan 2230 Richland 2<!25 Rotan
5/6/96 517196 4/27/90 5/7/96 2/3/93 517/96
ND ND trace ND ND ND
ND ND trace ND ND ND
MW-2S MW-2D MW-3S MW-3D MW-4S MW-4D
5.15 21-54 64-74 87-150 36-46 130-142
1/14/98 1/13/98 l/13/98 2/25/98 1/15/98 1/15/98
ND 6 ND ND ND ND
ND 17 ND ND ND ND
2308 2314
2304 Skyland Skyland Skyland 2309 Skyland
3/7/95 3fi/95 5/23/94 4/19/93 5/7/90 5/6/96
J ND ND ND 0.85 0.52J
0.91 0.75 0.72 ND ND
2415 Skyland 2634 Skyland Skyland Community Well
5/7/96 4/27/90 5/6/96 4/27/90 7/18/93 9/8/93
ND trace ND ND ND 1K
ND trace ND ND 2.4 1K
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\F eb05Semiannua1Apt-tbls.xls 1-11
8/24/00
ND
7.4
MW-5S
9-19
1/14/98
ND
ND
8/24/00
ND
ND
- -- -- -
2639 Springbrook 2232 Tate
10/17/00 1/24/01 5/9/01 8/10/01 11/20/01 2/25/98
ND ND ND ND ND ND
8.2 8.8 10 8.6 6.8 34
2400 Skyland
10/17/00 1/24/01 5/9/01 8/10/01 11/20/01
ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND
--- - --- - -- - - - - -This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, lnc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA.
~:E 627 DPR 2212 DPR 2231 DPR
6/11/90 6/11/90 6/14/90 7/13/90 1/25/94
ND trace ND 1K ND
CE ND 1K ND trace ND
Address 2307 DPR
Date 8/8/91 8/13/92 4/19/93 2/10/98 2/10/98
PCE ND ND ND ND ND
TCE 301 0.75 172 ND ND
Address
Date 4/27/90 517190 6/21/90 7/6/90 8/23/90
PCE 1K 0.85 1K ND 1K
TCE 101.4 NA 134.3 82 116.3
Address 2425 DPR
Date 517190 5/15/90
PCE 0.31 trace
TCE 8.4 6.8
Address 2509 DPR 2603 DPR
Date 517/96 6/11/90
PCE ND 1K
TCE ND 1K
Address 2723 DPR
Date 6/11/90
PCE ND
TCE ND
E,J -Estimated Value
A -Average Value
5/6/96
.76AJ
ND
7/13/90 2/3/93
ND J
7.0 30E
6/14/90 5/6/96
ND ND
ND ND
2800 DPR
5/23/90 5/6/96
ND 0.62AJ
ND ND
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given
ND -Not detected
3/19/93
trace
8.0
8/24/00
2.2
2.8
6/14/90
1K
1.2
517196 517190
ND 0.25
ND
5/15/90 5/20/90
trace trace
44.5 24.3
10/9/90 1/30/91
ND 1K
68AJ 84.2
1/25/94 5/30/95
ND ND
11 NA
2717 DPR
10/17/00 1/24/01
0.68 1.8
0.79 2.1
2816 DPR
5/6/96 2/10/98
6.4A 10
14A 18
K:\200641205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\Feb05SemiannualRpHbls.xls
Table 1-1 (continued)
Residential Well Historical Analytical Results
Davis Park Road TCE Site
2301 DPR 2304 DPR
5/15/90 7/13/90 1/25/94 517196 1/14/98 5/23/94
trace trace ND ND ND ND
44.5 37.1 ND ND ND 0.91
2403 DPR
7/12/90 1/30/91 7/23/92 4/19/93 9/24/93 1/25/94
trace trace ND ND ND ND
37.1 28 17 12 7.3 10
2419 OPA
5/20/91 2/3/93 6/21/93 9/24/93 1/25/94 8/5194
1K 0.48 0.56E ND ND ND
66.2 54 23 30 38 NA
2503 DPR
517/96 5/15/90 3/19/93 5/23/94
ND ND ND ND
3.0A ND 1.5 0.65
5/9/01 8/10/01 11/20/01 3/31/90 5/1/90 6/21/90
1.3 1.2 0.96 23.7 18.9
1.4 1.2 1.1 34.9 51.8 51.8
2839 DPR
8/24/00 10/17/00 1/24/01 5/9/01 8/10/01 11/20/01
ND ND ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND ND ND
1-12
5/30/95 1/16/98
ND ND
NA ND
5/30/95 517196 2/10/98 8/24/00
ND ND ND ND
NA 15A 8 2.4
2719 DPR
7/6/90 8/23/90 10/9/90 5/17/93
12 20.9 14 13.7
31 56.1 41 44.6
- - --
10/17/00 1/24/01 5/9/01 8/10/01 11/20/01
ND ND ND ND ND
2.4 2.6 2.6 2.2 1.8
1/25/94 1/25/94 517/96 1/14/98
18 17 10 14
51 50 32 32
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"I t::
J
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
SECTION 2
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 2
Revision; 0
Date: May 2005
LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION
The ROD for the Davis Park Road TCE Site (Septemher 1998) states that following initiation of
a natural attenuation study, groundwater monitoring will be conducted on a quarterly basis for
three years and annually for the next 27 years. First year LTRA sampling n:sults indicated a
continued decrease in contaminant concentrations as the plume migrates south and away from
the source area. Additionally, contamination concentrations did not vary significantly between
sequential quarters for any of the wells in the monitoring network. It was therefore
recommended that the sampling program be reduced from quarterly to semiannual monitoring
after the first year of the LTRA. Results from the quarterly sampling and first three rounds of
semiannual sampling are summarized below. Results from the fourth and most recent
semiannual event are summarized in Section 3.0. Data obtained from the long term groundwater
monitoring are used to evaluate natural attenuation of contaminant constituents within the
bedrock aquifer plume at the Davis Park Road Site following provision of city water to 64
residences in August 2000.
In April 2002 a baseline sampling event was conducted to establish current conditions and to
evaluate the need for installation of additional wells for the LTRA. Based on analytical results, it
was determined that natural attenuation was occurring at rates consistent with expectations, and
that the wells currently available for sampling were sufficient to evaluate natural attenuation in
long term performance monitoring. A Monitored Natural Attenuation Plan (submitted to EPA in
October 2002) was developed to include sampling a network of bedrock wells for VOCs to
effectively characterize contaminant levels (VOCs) in the bedrock aquifer within the
contaminant plume as well as the surrounding area for the potential migration of contaminants
from within the existing groundwater plume.
K:\20064\205\Second semiannual 3rd year\Fab05SemiannualRpuJoc 2-1 RFW205-2A-AT JK
I
I
O·
D
0
I
m
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 2
Revision: O
Date: May 2005
The eighteen bedrock wells initially included for groundwater sampling in each LTRA
monitoring event included four bedrock monitoring wells installed in December I 997 (MW-I
through MW-4), the five private wells provided with carbon filtration units in August 2000
(MW-5 through MW-9), two community wells located west or Davis Park Road (MW-10 ;ind
MW-11), four converted wells (MW-12 through MW-15), and three private wells (MW-16
through MW-18). Monitoring wells MW-2, MW-5, MW-6, MW-9, MW-12. MW-15, MW-16.
MW-17, and MW-18 were selected lo provide groundwater qu;tlity inform;1tion within the
contaminant plume. The remaining monitoring wells (MW-I, MW-3, MW-4, MW-7, MW-8.
MW-10, MW-I I. MW-13, and MW-14), located outside the contaminant plume, were selected
to provide evidence or potential contaminant migration.
Beginning with the first year fourth quarter sampling event, MW-13 was removed from the
sampling network and replaced with MW-I 9, located south of the site, just outside the
contaminant plume. Additionally, following the fourth quarter sampling event, two bedrock
wells were installed west of the plume to monitor the area between the plume and the currently
pumping community wells to the west or the site (MW-IO and MW-11). These wells were
incorporated into the monitoring network and are designated MW-20 and MW-21. Figure 2-1
provides the locations of the monitor well sampling network. Table 2-1 provides monitored
natural attenuation sample designations cross-referenced with addresses and former designations.
2.1 QUARTERLY AND SEMIANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING
The purpose of quarterly and semiannual groundwater monitoring is to verify the following:
• Thal natural attenuation is occurring at rates according to expectations,
• No changing conditions arise that might reduce efficacy of this remedy,
• The continued absence of toxic and/or mobile transformation products,
• Verification that the plume is not expanding,·
K:120064\205\Sacond semiannual 3rd year\f'eb05Semiannua1Rpt.doc 2-2 RFW205-2A-AT JK
L!!!I ---~····•-·-
□
□
D
C)
D
CJ
\ □• s
'
APRVD. DATE:
..__
\) 0
VJ ~ 0
'
<> C> CJ 0 \) \\ • \ ~ ~ ~ \ .P i ~ C 0 CJ C \ C C •• G 0
\
0 ~
000 CJ □ o □□ o
o D
~\ ~ ..
D
0 0
0
0
0 ~
~o
\ ~----ii ,, ..__ ---· \
□
\ / ~ ..__
D
REVISION
□
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
GASTONIA, GASTON COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
L TRA MONITOR WELLS
SAMPLING NETWORK
FIGURE 2-1
-CJl 0 a ◊ 0 {)
□ [j'
0 ~D D z I □ D I □ i'.J m D D D 'i)
D D
I □
~□ □ ~ m
D
□ □
□ D
□"
-
DRAWN: DAlE:
J. MILLER 6 5 02
LAYOUT: CADD FIL£:
2-1 ovispork.dwg
0 =
8 CJ
a~•/ ~
8 ~ ~
~
3,\11:10 OM0.:1.11:IVH
---
♦
W.O. NO.:
20064-138-100-0930
SHEET: OF 1 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
Sample ID Status
MW-I monitor well
MW-2 monitor well
MW-3 monilor well
MW-4 monitor well
MW-5 carbon unit
MW-6 carbon unit
MW-7 carhon unit
MW-8 carbon unit
MW-9 carbon unit
MW-10 COlllllHlllilv \\'l'II
MW-I I COllllllllllity wl'I]
MW-12 converted well
MW-13 converted wt.:11
MW-14 converted well
MW-15 converted well
MW-16 private
MW-17 rrivate
MW-18 private
MW-19 private
MW-20 monitor well
MW-21 monitor well
Table 2-1
L TRA Monitor Well Sampling Network
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Former Dcsignation(s) Street Address
MW-ID S of Cedar Oak
MW-2D 2816 Davis Park
MW-3D Lcnc.Jora Drive
MW-4D 2415 Skyland
CO-I. PW-2. 121 2419 Davis Park
CO-13. 235 2717 Davis Park
298 2839 Davis Park
252 2400 Skyland
182 2639 Springbrook
CO-2. 300 2634 Skyland
CU-3. 269 Briar Oak
CW-5 Cedar Oak Subdivision
2719 Davis Park
CW-6 Cedar Oak Subdivision
2241 Cedar Oak
CW-4, 49 2403 Davis Park
CW-7. 175 2232 Tate
CO-5. 195 2725 Puritan
CO-14, 286 2816 Davis Park
192 2800 Davis Park
277 2833 Penny Park
-Lendora Drive (north of Sky land)
-Lendora Drive (south of Sky land)
2-4
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\Feb0SSemiannualRpt-tbls.xls
Depth
(feet below
!.'round surface)
75.
54
150
142
187
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknm\'ll
270
112
125
74
145
Unknown
Unknown
Unknmvn
Unknmvn
173
135
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
D
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
• Verification that there is no impact downgradient,
• Detection of any new releases, and
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 2
Revision: 0
Date: May 2005
• Verification of attainment of remediation objectives.
The samples arc collected in accordance with the rollowing documents:
• Final Monitored Natural Attenuation Plan. dated October 2002.
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science and Ecosystem Support Division (EPA-
SESD), Region 4, revised Environmental Investigation Standard Operating procedure and
Quality Assurance Manual (EISOPQAM). May 1996, and
• U.S. Geological Survey, User's Guide for Polyethylene-Based Passive Diffusion Bag
Samplers to Obtain Volatile Organic Compound Concentrations in Wells, 200 I.
All samples are analyzed by laboratories in the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). Samples arc I analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method 8260.
I 2.2 FIRST YEAR OUARTERL Y LTRA SAMPLING EVENTS (2002/2003)
I The first quarter sampling event, performed in April 2002, was originally developed as the
baseline event to establish current conditions and to evaluate the need for installation of I additional wells. Based on analytical results, it was determined that the wells currently available
for sampling were sufficient to evaluate natural attenuation in long term performance I monitoring. Thirteen of the 18 wells selected for the sampling network and two additional wells
were sampled in the baseline-sampling event. All I 8 wells in the LTRA sampling network were I sampled during the second and third quarter sampling events, performed in September and
December 2002, respectively.
I
I
I
During the fourth quarter sampling event, performed in March 2003, monitor well MW-13 could
not be sampled due to hostile property owners. The residence at 2833 Davis Park Road was
K:1200641205\Second semiannual 3rd year\FebOSSemiannualRpt.doc 2-5 RFW205-2A-AT JK
I
I
I
I
I
g
0
R
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part. without the
express written permission of EPA.
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 2
Revision: O
Date: May 2005
sampled instead, and incorporated into the monitor well network as MW-I 9. Because the current
owners of the property were not willing to allow samplers to pass through their yard to access the
well, and because VOCs have not historically been detected in groundwater sampled from the
well, MW-13 was removed from the monitor well network permanently and replaced with MW-
19. All of the remaining 17 wells in the LTRA sampling network were sampled during the fourth
quarter sampling event.
Depth to water was recorded where possible (MW-I through MW-4, MW-12 through MW-15)
prior to sampling. Field parameters (pH, specific conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen,
oxidation reduction potential, and turbidity) were also recorded. The potentiometric map for the
bedrock aquif"cr in first through fourth quarter LTRA sampling events indicated a grnundwatcr
llow direction in the bedrock aquifer ranging from south to cast across the site, with the strongest
component of llow to the southeast. This is consistent with previously reported data.
TCE and PCE concentrations detected in groundwater during the first through fourth quarter
sampling events suggest the contaminant plume is migrating slightly to the west and also
southeast. Concentrations were significantly less than those detected in 1990 for wells in the
northern portion of the plume. However, concentrations increased slightly in wells to the west
and southeast. Levels were consistent with a naturally attenuating plume that is shifting due to
pumping (community wells on Skyland Drive and Briar Oak Drive located west of the site) and
to a groundwater llow direction trending to the southeast and Blackwood Creek. First through
fourth quarter analytical results arc detailed in the LTRA Second, Third, and Fourth Quarter
Sampling Event Reports submitted to EPA in January, April, and June 2003, respectively.
K:\20064\205\Second somi.innual 3rd yenr\Feb05Semiannua1Rp1.doc 2-6 flFW205-2A-AT JK
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 2
Revision: O
Date: May 2005
2.3 SEMIANNUAL LTRA SAMPLING EVENTS (AUGUST 2003/FEHRUARY I 2004/AUGUST 2004)
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Following the first year of quarterly sampling at the Davis Park Road Site. two additional
monitoring wells were installed between the contaminant plume and the currently pumping
community wells MW-10 and MW-I I. These wells, designated MW-20 and MW-21, were
incorporated into the LTRA monitoring well network and sampled in August 2003. February
2004. and August 2004. During these sampling events, the nine wells in the monitor well
network that could he accessed at the well-head were sampled using both low-llow technology
and passive diffusive bag (PDBJ samplers. PDBs were evaluated and found to be an effective
sampling alternative to the low-llow method of sampling. PDBs were subsequently
recommended as the select method for sampling monitoring wells that can be accessed for the
remainder of the LTRA.
PDBs arc polymer membranes lilied with deionized water that are placed at select depths into the
groundwater column. Organic analytes permeate the membrane, diffusing deionized water out of
the device until equilibrium is reached with the surrounding groundwater. Advantages to using
PDBs verses traditional sampling methods include decreased spending on labor and equipment
and elimination of containing and disposing of sampling purge and decontamination lluids.
The potentiometric map for the bedrock aquifer based on the semiannual L TRA sampling events
indicated a groundwater llow direction in the bedrock aquifer ranging from south to cast across
the site, with the strongest component to the southeast, consistent with previous reports.
However, the addition of three new survey points (MW-15, MW-20, and MW-21) provided data
indicating that to the north of the site there is also a west to southwest component to the
groundwater llow. This llow component was attributed to the actively pumping community
wells to the west of the site.
K:\20064\205\Second semiannual 3rd year\Feb05Semiannua1Rp1.doc 2-7 RFW205-2A-ATJK
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Par1< Road TCE Site
Section: 2
Revision: O
Date: May 2005
TCE and PCE concentrations detected in groundwater during the semiannual L TRA sampling
events continued to suggest the contaminant plume is migrating slightly to the west and also to
the south. TCE and PCE levels were consistent with a naturally attenuating plume that is
shifting slightly due to pumping and to a groundwater !low direction trending to the southeast.
The semiannual analytical results arc detailed in the LTRA August 2003, February 2004, and
August 2004 Semiannual Sampling Event Reports submitted to EPA in December 2003, April
2004, and November 2004, respectively.
K:\20064\205\Second serniannual 3rd year1Feb05SemiannuuIRpt.doc 2-8 RFW205-2A-AT JK
I
I
u
g
D
u
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions. Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 3
Revision: 0
Date: May 2005
SECTION 3
FEBRUARY 2005 LTRA SUMMARY
Section 3 of this report su111111anzes activities conducted as part of the fourth se111iannual
sa111pling event for the Davis Park Road TCE L TRA.
3.1 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
I 3.1.1 Monitor Well Sampling Procedures
I WESTON 111obilized lo the site the week of I February 2005. With the exception of one location,
MW-6, which could not be accessed, groundwater sa111ples were collected fro111 all wells in the I 111nni1or well network from I February through 2 February 2005. PDB sa111plers were used lo
sample the nine 111onitoring wells that can be directly accessed al the Davis Park Road Site (MW-
I I through MW-4, MW-12, MW-14, MW-15, MW-20, and MW-21). Hanger assemblies, to
which PDBs in protective 111esh were attached, were placed al selected depths along I polypropylene ropes for each of the accessible wells during the August 2004 sa111pling event (see
Table 3-1 ).
I
During the February 2005 sampling event, each of the PDBs was pulled and pierced with a s111all I discharge tube which allowed the transfer of the groundwater lo 40 milliliter septa vials that
contained hydrochloric acid preservative. After the sampler bag was disconnected fro111 the rope, I a new filled PDB sampler was attached and placed downhole at the same depth. The PDB will
I
I
I
K:\20064\205\Second semiannual 3rd year\Feb05Semiannua1Rpt.doc 3-1 RFW205-2A·AT JK
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Woston Solutions, Inc., expressly !or EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, wi1hout the exprnss wrilten permission of EPA
Table 3-1
Passive Diffusion Bag Sampler Placement
Davis Park Road
Well ID Former ID
MW-1 MW-1D
MW-2 MW-2D
MW-3 MW-3D
MW-4 MW-4D
MW-12 CW-5
MW-14 CW-4
MW-15 2232 Tate
MW-20 North Lendora Dr.
MW-21 South Lendora Dr.
ft bgs = feet below ground surface
. ft msl = feet above mean sea level
Screened
Interval
(tt bgs)
40-75
21-54
86-150
130-142
68-103
?-74
?-143
163-173
125-135
:l-2
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\Feb05SerniannuaIRpt-tbls.xls
Sampler
Elevation Depth
(It msl) (ft bgs)
688 58.5
685 36
746 108
740 129.5
707 75
768 68
721 135
768 170
721 132
Sampler
Elevation
(It msl)
629.5
662
659
610
627
705
591
598
589
I
I
g
D
0
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 3
Revision: 0
Date: May 2005
then equilibrate with the surrounding groundwater for the next sampling event (scheduled for
February 2006).
All samples were placed on ice prior to shipment under CLP protocol to EPA -A4 Scientific,
located in The Woodlands, Texas, for VOC analysis using EPA Method 8260.
3.1.2 Community and Private \Vcll Sampling Prorcdurcs
Community wells MW-10 and MW-I I and private wells MW-5 through MW-9 and MW-16
through MW-19 were purged and sampled from the in-situ pumping system, but prior lo any
filter mechanism that may have been in place. Wells were purged al approximately I gallon per
minute for a period of approximately 15 minutes. Specific conductivity, pl-I, temperature,
dissolved oxygen, and oxidation/reduction potential were measured approximately every 5
minutes during the purge process. Purging continued until parameters were stable for three
successive readings, and samples were collected directly into pre-labeled, pre-preserved 40-
milliliter (ml) glass vials. Water quality data sheets and field log notes arc provided in
Appendix A.
3.1.3 Field Quality Assurance/Quality Control Samples
One rinse blank, one trip blank, two duplicates and one lab-grade deionized water sample were I collected during the sampling event. The rinse blank was collected by pouring laboratory-grade
deionized water into the PDB and collecting directly into pre-labeled, pre-preserved 40-ml glass
I
I
I
I
vials. One trip blank was collected by pouring lab-grade deionized water directly from the
deionized water container into the sample vial prior to commencing field activities. The trip
blank was stored with collected samples throughout the sampling event. The duplicate samples
were collected from well MW-15, using two PDB samplers, and well MW-9 (supplied with a
K:120064\205\Second semiannual 3rd year1Feb05SomiannuaIRpt doc 3-3 RFW205-2A-AT JK
I
I
I
D
D
0
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in pa~. without the
express written pennission of EPA.
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 3
Revision: O
Date: May 2005
carbon filter unit). The lab-grade deionized water sample was collected by pouring lab-grade
deionized water directly from the water container into the sample vial. All samples were
analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method 8260.
Analytical results for the QA/QC sa111ples arc su111111arized in Table 3-2. Chloroform was I detected in the rinse blank, trip blank, and laboratory-grade deionized water sa111plc at estimated
concentrations below the reporting li111it. No other VOCs were reported in the QA/QC sa111ples.
Chlorofor111 was detected in groundwater samples collected fro111 MW-7 and MW-17 at
estimated values below the reporting limits. Chloroform was not cktected in groundwater
samples collected from PDBs.
I
I
I
Duplicate results were comparable to previous sa111pling events ($25'fo relative percent
difference) for all COCs identified at concentrations above the reporting limit.
3.2 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
WESTON collected water level measurements relcrenced to the top of the well casmg for I monitoring wells MW-I through MW-4, MW-12, MW-14, MW-15, MW-20 and MW-21 on I
and 2 February 2005 (Table 3-3). Depth to water was measured using an electronic water level I meter. The water level probe and tape were deconta111inated prior to each 111easurement. Figure 3-
1 provides a potentiometric surface map of the bedrock aquifer. During the previous se111iannual I sampling event, data from monitoring well MW-21 was considered ano111alously high, and not
included for development of the potentiometric surface map. During this sa111pling event, the I water level in this well was carefully evaluated and measured at various times during the event to
confir111 findings and to evaluate for potential fluctuations. The water level remained I anomalously high relative to the other 111onitoring wells in the well network. It is likely the well
I
I
K:\20064\205\Second semiannual 3rd year\Feb05Sem,annua1Rpl.doc RFW205·2A-AT JK
I
I
I
D
0
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
Table 3-2
February 2005 Semiannual LTRA QA/QC Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Sample Identification: DI Trip EB MW-15
Water Blank PDB
Rinse Blank
Date Sampled: 2/2/05 2/1/05 2/2/05 2/2/05
Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1) duplicate
Chloroform 0.17J 0.19 0.18J ND 0.25J
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene ND ND ND 3.6 3.4
MTBE ND ND ND 0.09 ND
Trich1oroethene ND ND ND 39 39
Tetrachloroethene ND ND ND 0.30J 0.37J
Miscellaneous Compounds (ug/1) Ci] unknown(s) 2.0J 1.SJ 3.6J 4.3J
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethyl ND ND ND ND
Cyclotetrasiloxane, Octamethyl 5.1NJ
D
J 3.6NJ ND 18NJ
Notes:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during the baseline sampling event are included in this table
ND= not detected in sample
J = estimated value
NJ = presumptive evidence analyte is present: analyte reported as estimate value
Bolded values exceed EPA MC Ls
PDB = Passive Diffusion Bag
Samples were analyzed following CLP protocol.
3-5
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\Feb0SSemiannualRpt-tbls.xls
I
MW-9
2/2/05
duplicate
ND ND
0.93 1.2
0.15J 0.18J
9.4 12
0.34J 0.51
1.4J 0.51J
ND 0.51NJ
ND 1.9NJ
I
II!!! l!!!!!!!!!!!I l!!!!!I == lliiliil liiiiil liii1 iiiil iiiil liiii iiiil
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It ~hall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of EPA.
Sample ID.
Former ID:
Street Location:
Screened Interval:
Total Depth (record):
Date:
Top of Casing Elevation (ft msl):
Depth to Water (It bloc):
Water Elevation (ft msl :
Notes:
ft msl = feet above mean sea level
ft bloc = feet below top of casing
ft= feet
MW-1
MW-10
S of Cedar Oak
40-75 ft
75
2/1/05
687.50
3.87
683.63
Table 3-3
Semiannual L TRA Groundwater Elevation Data
February 2005
Davis Park Road TCE Site
MW-2 MW-3 MW-4
MW-2D MW-3D MW-4D
MW-12
CW-5
2816 DPR N of 2400 Skyland 2415 Skyland Cedar Oak Subdivision
21-54 87-150 130-142 70-112
54 150 142 112
2/1/05 2/1/05 2/1/05 2/1 /05
684.6 746.29 740.0 707.21
3.60 23.58 33.30 14.07
681.00 722.71 706.67 693.14
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\Feb0SSemiannualRpt-tbls.xls 3-6
MW-14 MW-15 MW-20 MW-21
CW-4 CW-7 CO-5
2403 DPR 2332 Tate Lendora N Lendora N
Unknown Unknown 163-173 125-135
74 143.3 173 135
2/1/05 2/1 /05 2/1/05 2/1/05
768.75 720.99 743.72 750.85
46.11 4.76 24.94 0.2
722.64 716.23 718.78 750.65
iiiil
----l!!l!!!!!I .. ~ 0
0
D
D D C':i I D PENNy C:J "'Q
•➔ ·+ D Do
0 ◊ \J
D D 0 D 0
CJ
\0 CJ
□®" iii
' ' '
\ • l L41');7
()() -
/ '" 71 s
D
APRVD. DATE: REVISION
--!!l!!!!I llllilll -11!!!1 ---.. ---"' ui~♦--z "' () C> CJ ◊ <:> 0 ◊ 0 '> \) <> \> \) <> <> 0 \) D \) D \) "' \) ® \ Cl G ~ ◊ ~ ,;o 0 \j 0 Cl , 0 \j 0 CJ IJ 0 \> G 1}® ~ 0 = D 0 \J m D ® ':\ \ □ ... ~\ 1\ 0 i®
-
0
0
CEN
Q 0 D .., 0 Q 0 ~
0 0
0 \ 0 " Q ~ e'\ 0
D
\)
D I D
0 ~D \®□ n
g 0
CJ '-r-() 0
!tg <?
~g ',®\~ O< em .......... ~ ...... ~i -.-·~'0. ----'+-~?o
□
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
GASTONIA, GASTON COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
□
POTENTIOMETRIC CONTOUR MAP
BEDROCK AQUIFER
FEBRUARY 2005
FIGURE 3-1
• ~ ~~ ~ i r,.."40 i Q ~~9 8 a "'"'
c:JQ
0
0
I] D
[] 1] • a
D ~□ ~ □ C
D z ~ □ lo D C
0 m
i □ D
CJ m D D □ □ D □ D 'iJ D D □ D
---
__, __, u, 0 u, u, 8
"u, ~ 0~ --, --,
'"0 c;
zo "' =J z c; o_, r <: 0 '" "'c <
~:;o ,l> =! Oz 0
~M z
"'"' --,,< ~~ 3
c; ""
DRAWN: DATE:
K. SPIKES 05/27 /03
LAYOUT: CADD FILE
Fi -3-1 FIGS.dwg
D
.,•·
~r \'i
0 0 'I 0 n "
3AIMO OMO:ilMVH
-
*
r '" C)
'" z
" 0
c; r r
r 0 0 ,. --,
0 z
W.0. NO.
20064-138-100-0930
SHF.ET: OF
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions. Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 3
Revision: O
Date: May 2005
is screened in a low yield fracture that equilibrated over time to the current elevation. The I measurement was again not included for development of the potcntiometric surface map.
I 3.3 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
I 3.3.1 Groundwater Samples
I
I
TCE and PCE were the only VOC constituents to exceed the ROD Performance Standards in
groundwater samples collected during the February 2005 Semiannual LTRA sampling event.
TCE and/or PCE were detected in groundwater sampled from 8 of the I 9 wells sampled. The
Performance Standard of 2.8 µg/1 (TCE) and/or I µg/1 (PCE) was exceeded in 6 groundwater I samples. TCE exceeded the ROD Performance Standard in the following samples: MW-9 (9.4
µg/1), MW-15 (39 µg/1), and MW-17 (12 µg/1). PCE exceeded the ROD Performance Standard in I the following samples: MW-2 (2.0 µg/1), MW-12 (1.2 ftg/1), MW-17 (5.3 µg/1), and MW-18 (3.9
µg/1). Monitor well MW-6 which has historically exceeded the ROD Performance Standards for I TCE and PCE could not be accessed for sampling during this event.
I Laboratory analytical results for first year through third year L TRA sampling events arc
summarized in Table 3-4. The February 2005 analytical results arc summarized graphically in
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figures 3-2 and 3-3 for TCE and PCE, respectively. Laboratory analytical reports are included in
Appendix 8.
The highest TCE concentration (39 µg/1) was detected in groundwater sampled from monitor
well MW-I 5, located at the west central portion of the site. The second highest TCE
concentration ( 12 µg/1) was detected in groundwater sampled from monitor well MW-I 7, located
on the southern side of the site. The highest PCE concentration (5.3 µg/1) was also detected in
groundwater sampled from MW-17. The second highest PCE concentration (3.9 µg/1) was
K\20064\205\Second semiannual 3rd year\Feb05Semiannua1Rp1.doc 3-8 RFW205·2A-AT JK
------- - -- --- - --Table 3-4
LTRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample ID: MW-1
S of
Location: Cedar Oak
Date Sampled: Apr-02 Scp-02 Dcc-02 i\lar-OJ Auµ:-OJ Feh-0.f Aug-04
Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1)
Chloromethane .. .. .. .. .. 0.28J ..
1, 1-0ichloroethene .. .. .. . . .. ..
Acetone .. .. .. .. . . 11 12
Methylene Chloride .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Carbon Disulfide .. .. .. .. .. . . ..
Methyl T-Butyl Ether .. .. .. . . .. .. . .
i, 1-0ichloroethene .. .. .. .. ·• .. ..
1, 1-Dichloroethane .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene .. .. .. .. . . .. ..
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene .. .. .. .. .. . . ..
Methyl Ethyl Ketone .. .. .. .. .. 7.6 ..
Chloroform .. .. .. .. . . . . ..
Benzene .. .. .. . . .. . . ..
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane .. .. .. .. .. .. . .
Cyclohexane .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
1,2-Dichloroethane .. .. .. .. . . . . ..
f'Trichloroethene .. .. .. .. .. . . ..
Methyfcycfohexane .. .. .. . . .. . . ..
Methyl tsobutyl Ketone .. .. .. . . .. . . ..
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .. .. .. .. .. . . ..
tfoluene .. .. .. .. .. .. . .
tr etrachloroethene .. .. .. .. .. .. . .
Ethylbenzene .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
!Total Xylenes .. .. .. . . .. . . ..
Bromoform .. .. .. . . .. . . ..
1,3-0ichlorobenzene .. .. .. .. . . .. ..
1,4-Dichlorobenzene .. .. .. . . .. . . ..
,.,1sce11aneous l,Ompounas
I I I I I I I
Unknown(s) .. .. .. . . .. . . ..
Benzene, 1,3,5-Trimethyl .. .. .. . . .. . . ..
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethyl .. .. .. . . .. . . ..
Cyclotetrastloxane, Octamethyl .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during the baseline sampling event are included in this table.
J = estimated value; N = presumptive evidence of material; U = not detected at or above the reporting limit
A= Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average• of replicates.
Bolded values exceed ROD Pertormance Standards
Samples were analyzed followi'"!g CLP protocol.
--indicates not detected above the reporting limit
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\Feb05SemiannuaIRpt-tbls.xls 3-9
Fcb-0.:i
. .
..
. .
. .
..
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
..
. .
. .
. .
..
..
..
. .
. .
. .
. .
..
..
. .
..
I I
2.6J . .
. . . .
-- -
-- - - -- -- ---- --- -Table 3-4
L TRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample ID: MW-2
2816
Location: DPR
Date Sampled: Apr-02 Scp-02 Bcc-02 ~lar-0.' Aug-OJ Feh-0..J Aug-04
Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1)
Chloromethane .. .. 0.2BJB .. .. .. ..
1, 1-Dichloroethene .. 0.51 --.. 0.31J .. ..
Acetone ------.. .. 10J 28A
Methylene Chloride --.. --.. .. --..
Carbon Disulfide ----------.. ..
Methyl T-Butyl Ether .. .. .. . . .. .. --
1, 1-Dichloroethene --.. ----------
1, 1-Dichloroethane .. .. .. .. .. .. --
!trans 1 ,2-Dichloroethene .. .. .. . . --.. --
cis 1,2-Dich1oroethene .. .. --.. .. .. ..
Methyl Ethyl Ketone --.. .. --.. 6.9 ..
Chloroform 0.44J 0.528 0.37J 0.50 0.32J 0.40J ..
Benzene .. .. .. . . .. .. ..
1, 1, 1-T richloroethane 0.48J 0.58 0.43J 0.45J 0.31J 0.35J ..
Cyclohexane .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
1 ,2-0ichloroethane .. --.. . . --.. ..
trrichloroethene 3.0 6.1 4.3 4.1 2.9 4.0 2.7A
Methylcyclohexane .. ----.. --.. ..
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone .. .. .. --.. --..
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .. .. --.. . . .. ..
troluene .. .. .. .. .. . . ..
1Tetrach1oroethene 2.5 3.7 2.7 3.0 2.0 1.3 1.9A
Ethyl benzene .. .. --.. --0.23J 0.52AJ
JTotal Xylenes ----.. .. . . 0.19J ..
Bromoform .. .. .. --.. --..
1,3-Dichlorobenzene .. .. .. .. --.. ..
1,4-Dichlorobenzene .. .. .. .. . . --..
,.,,sce11aneous 1..,ompounas
I I I I I I I
Unknown(s) .. --.. . . --.. . .
Benzene, 1,3,5-Trimethyl --.. .. .. .. .. ..
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethyl .. --.. .. --.. ..
Cyclotetrasiloxane, Octamethyl ----.. .. .. .. . .
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during the baseline sampling event are included in this table.
J = estimated value; N = presumptive evidence of material; U = not detected at or above the reporting limit
A = Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
Balded values exceed ROD Performance Standards
Samples were analyzed following CLP protocol.
•-indicates not detected above the reporting limit
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\FebOSSemiannualRpt-tbls.xls 3-10
Fch-05
. .
--
..
--..
--
..
--
..
--..
..
. .
0.24J
. .
. .
2.7
--..
--
. .
2.0
0.40J
0.35J
. .
. .
. .
I I
4.0J --
. .
7.5NJ
-- -
-- - - -- - - --------Table 3-4
LTRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample ID: MW-3
N of 2400
Location: Skyland
Date SamJJ)ed: Apr-02 Scp-02 Dcc-02 :\tar-OJ Fch-04 :\ug-04 Feh-05
Volatile Organic Compounds (ugll)
Chloromethane --------------
1, 1-Dichloroethene --------------
Acetone --------8.9J 16 --
Methylene Chloride --------------
Carbon Disulfide --------------
Methyl T-Butyl Ether 12 14 10 15 3.0 13 11
1, 1-Dichloroethene --------------
1, 1-0ichloroethane --------------
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene --------------
leis 1,2-Dichloroethene --------------
Methyl Ethyl Ketone --------6.6 ----
Chloroform --------------
Benzene --------0.49J ----
1 , 1, 1 ·Trichloroethane --------------
Cyclohexane --------------
1,2-Dichloroethane --------------
tTrichloroethene --------------
Methylcyclohexane --------------
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone --------------
ICis-1,3-Dichloropropene --------------
tToluene --------------
tT etrachloroethene --0.22J 0.18J 0.23J 0.18J --0.20J
Ethylbenzene --------------
tTotal Xylenes ----0.24J 0.11J 1.5 ----
Bromoform --------------
1,3-Dichlorobenzene --------------
1,4-0ichtorobenzene ----0.15J --------
m1sce11aneous c.;ompounas
I I I I I I
Unknown(s) ------------3 7J
Benzene, 1,3.5-Trimethyl --------------
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethyl --------------
Cyclotetrasitoxane, Octamethyl ------------4 3NJ
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during the baseline sampling event are included in this table.
J = estimated value; N = presumptive evidence of material; U = not detected at or above the reporting limit
A= Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average· of replicates.
Balded values exceed ROD Performance Standards
Samples were analyzed following CLP protocol.
•· indicates not detected above the reporting limit
I
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\Feb05SemiannuaIRpt-tbls.xls 3-11
- --
------ - - -- - - -- --Table 3-4
LTRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample ID: MW-4
2415
Location: Skyland
Bate Sampled: Apr-02 Scp-02 Dcc-02 ,\lar-flJ Aug-OJ
Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1)
Chloromethane ------
1, 1-0ichloroethene ------
Acetone ------
Methylene Chloride ------
Carbon Disulfide ------
Methyl T-Butyl Ether ------
1, 1-Dichloroethene ------
1, 1-Dichloroethane ------
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene ------
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene ------
Methyl Ethyl Ketone ------
Chloroform ------
Benzene ------
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane ------
Cyclohexane ------
1.2-Dichloroethane ------
tr richloroethene ------
Methylcyclohexane 0.48J ----
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone ------
le is-1,3-Dichtoropropene ------
!Toluene 0.18J ----
tT etrachloroethene ------
Ethylbenzene ------
tTotal Xylenes ----0.17J
Bromoform ------
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene ------
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene ------
,v,,sceuaneous compounds
Unknown(s) ------
Benzene, 1,3,5-Trimethyl ------
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethyl ------
Cyclotetrasiloxane, Octamethyl ------
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during
J indicates estimated value; N indicates-presumptive evidence of
A = Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
Bolded values exceed ROD Performance Standards
Samples were analyzed following CLP protocol.
--indicates not detected above the reporting limit
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\Feb05SemiannuaIRpt-tbls.xls 3-12
--0.18J
----
----
----
--0.56
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
--------
Fch-0-t Aug-04 Fch-05
0.33J ----
------
11 10J --
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
8.6 ----
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
0.14J 0.56J 0.33J
----0.45J
------
------
------
----1.SJ
------
------
------
-- -
----- - -- - -- -- - - -Table 3-4
LTRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample ID:
Location:
Date Sampled: Apr-02 Sco-02 Dcc-02
Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1)
Chloromethane ------
1, 1-Dichloroethene ------
Acetone ------
Methylene Chloride ------
Carbon Disulfide ------
Methyl T-Butyl Ether ------
1, 1-Dichloroethene ------
1, 1-Dichloroethane ------
ttrans 1.2-0ichloroethene ------
cis 1,2-0lchloroethene ------
Methyl Ethyl Ketone ------
Chloroform ------
Benzene ------
1 , 1 . 1-T richloroethane ------
Cyclohexane ------
1.2-0ichloroethane ------
tTrichloroethene 1.4 1.9 1.SJ
Methylcyclohexane ------
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone ------
cis-1 ,3-0ichloropropene ------
froluene ------
IT etrachloroethene ------
Ethylbenzene ------
tTotal Xylenes ------
Bromoform ------
1,3-0ichlorobenzene ------
1,4-0ichlorobenzene ------
,.,1sce11aneous compounds
I I I
Unknown(s) ------
Benzene, 1,3,5-Trimethyl ------
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethyl ------
Cyclotetrasiloxane, Octamethyl ------
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during
J indicates estimated value; N indicates presumptive evidence of
I
A = Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average· of replicates.
Bolded values exceed ROD Performance Standards
Samples were analyzed following CLP protocol.
--indicates not detected above the reporting limit
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\Feb05Semiannua1Rpt-tbls.xls 3-13
MW-5
2419
DPR
i\lar-0.\ Aug:-0] Fch-0-1 Aug-04 Fch-05
----0.32J ----
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
0.15J --------
----------
0.15J --0.11J ----
--------
----------
----------
----------
1.7 1.6 1 .4 0.96J 0.67
--------------------
----0.13J ----
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
----------
I I I I
--------11 J
----------
--------------------
---
I
-- - ---- -- - -- ---Table 3-4
L TRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample ID:
Location:
Date Sampled: Apr-02 Scp-02 Dec-02
Volatile Organic Compounds (ugll)
Chloromethane .. .. . .
1, 1-0ichloroethene .. .. ..
Acetone 12 .. ..
Methylene Chloride .. .. ..
Carbon Disulfide .. .. ..
Methyl T-Butyl Ether .. .. . .
1. 1-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
1, 1-Dichloroethane .. .. 0.59J
trans 1,2-0ichloroethene .. .. ..
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
Methyl Ethyl Ketone .. .. ..
Chloroform .. .. ..
Benzene .. .. ..
1. 1, 1-Trichloroethane .. .. ..
Cyclohexane .. .. ..
1,2-Dichloroethane .. 0.16 ..
Trichloroethene 1.6 .. 3.9J
Methy!cyclohexane .. .. ..
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone .. .. ..
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .. .. ..
Toluene 0.18J .. ..
Tetrachloroethene 1.5 1.2 2.7J
Ethylbenzene .. .. ..
Total Xylenes .. .. ..
Bromoform .. .. ..
1 .3-0ichlorobenzene .. .. ..
1 .4-Dichlorobenzene .. .. ..
,.,1sce11an.eous L,Ompounas
I I I
Unknown(s) .. .. ..
Benzene, 1,3,5-Trimethyl .. .. ..
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethyf .. .. ..
Cyclotetrasiloxane, Octamethyl .. .. ..
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during
J indicates estimated value!; N indicates presumptive evidence of
MW-6
2717
DPR
~lar-0.~
..
..
<7.3
. .
..
..
..
0.33J
..
..
..
. .
..
..
..
..
3.4
..
..
..
. .
3.0 ..
..
. .
..
0.11J
I
..
. .
.. ..
A= Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
Bolded values exceed ROD Performance Standards
Samples were analyzed following CLP protocol.
--indicates not detected above the reporting limit
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\FebOSSemiannualRpt-tbls.xls
MW-7
2837
DPR
Au~-03 Feh-04 Sl·p-02 Dec-02 ;'\lar-03 Au~-03 Fch-04
0.34J 0.30J .. .. .. .. ..
.. . . .. . . .. . . ..
.. . . .. . . <7.5 .. ..
.. . . .. . . .. . . ..
.. . . .. . . .. .. . .
.. . . 0.17J 0.19J 0.12J .. 0.23J
.. . . .. . . .. .. ..
0.20J 0.31J .. . . .. .. . .
. . .. .. . . .. . . ..
.. . . .. . . .. .. ..
.. .. .. . . .. .. . .
.. . . .. . . 0.10J .. 0.24J
.. . . .. . . .. .. ..
.. . . .. . . .. . . ..
. . .. .. .. . . .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. . . ..
1.9 3.0 .. .. .. .. . .
. . .. .. . . .. .. . .
.. . . .. . . .. . . ..
.. .. .. . . .. .. ..
.. .. .. . . .. .. ..
1.8 2.8 .. .. .. .. . .
.. . . .. . . .. . . ..
.. . . .. .. . . .. ..
.. . . .. . . .. .. ..
.. 0.11J .. .. . . .. ..
.. 0.11J .. . . .. . . ..
I I I I I I I
.. .. .. .. . . .. ..
.. .. .. .. . . .. ..
.. .. .. . . .. . . ..
. . .. .. . . .. .. ..
3-14
---
Aui,.:-04 Feb-OS
. . ..
.. ..
.. . .
.. ..
.. . .
. . 0.23J
. . . .
.. ..
.. ..
. . ..
. . ..
.. 0.30J
. . ..
. . ..
. . ..
. . ..
. . ..
.. ..
. . ..
.. . .
. . ..
. . ..
.. . .
. . ..
. . ..
. . ..
. . ..
I I I
. . 2 OJ
. . ..
. . ..
. . 10NJ
- - ----- - -- - -- -- -Table 3-4
L TRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample ID: MW-8
2400
Location: Skyland
Date Sampled: Scp-02 Dcc-02 l\lur-0., Aui,.:-0.' Fch-0-t Aug-04 Fch-05
Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1)
Chloromethane .. 0.32JB .. 0.40J .. .. . .
1, 1-Dichloroethene .. .. .. .. .. .. . .
Acetone .. .. <12 .. .. .. . .
Methylene Chloride .. .. . . .. . . .. ..
Carbon Disulfide .. .. .. .. .. .. . .
Methyl T-Butyl Ether 1.8 1.2J 1.7 1.1 1.2 .. 0.42J
1, 1-Dichloroethene .. .. .. .. .. .. . .
1, 1-Dichloroethane .. .. . . .. . . .. ..
rans 1,2-Dichloroethene .. .. . . .. . . .. ..
is 1 ,2-Dichloroethene .. .. . . .. .. .. . .
Methyl Ethyl Ketone .. 6.BJ .. .. .. .. . .
Chloroform .. .. . . .. .. .. ..
Benzene .. .. . . .. . . .. ..
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane .. .. . . .. .. .. . .
Cyclohexane .. .. . . .. . . .. ..
1,2-Dichloroethane .. .. .. . . .. .. . .
Trichloroethane .. .. .. .. . . .. . .
Methylcyclohexane .. .. . . .. . . .. . .
Methyl !sobutyl Ketone .. .. .. . . .. .. . .
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .. .. . . .. . . .. . .
Toluene .. 2.0J .. .. .. .. . .
IT etrachloroethene .. 0.12J 0.16J .. 0.16J .. ..
Ethylbenzene .. .. . . .. .. .. . .
!Total Xylenes .. .. . . .. .. .. . .
Bromoform .. .. .. .. . . .. . .
1,3-Dichlorobenzene .. .. . . .. . . .. ..
1,4-Dichlorobenzene .. .. . . .. . . .. . .
m1sce11aneous c.;ompounas
I I I i I I I
Unknown(s) .. .. .. .. .. .. 3.4J
Benzene, 1,3,5-Trimethyl .. .. . . .. .. .. . .
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethyl .. .. . . .. . . .. . .
Cyclotetrasiloxane, Octamethyl .. .. .. .. . . .. 13NJ
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during the baseline sampling event are included in this table.
J = estimated value; N = presumptive evidence of material; U = not detected at or above the reporting limit
A= Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
Balded values exceed ROD Performance Standards
Samples were analyzed foTiowing CLP protocol.
--indicates not detected above the reporting limit
I
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\Feb05Semiannua1Rpt-tbls.x!s 3-15
- --
-- - - - -- - - -- - ----Table 3-4
L TRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample ID: MW-9
2639
Location: Springbrook
Date Sampled: Apr-02 Sep-02 Dcc-02 i\lar-0.' All!,!:•OJ Fdi-0-1 Au~-0-1
Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1)
Chloromethane ----------0.30J --
1, 1-0ichloroethene --------------
Acetone ------<9.4 ------
Methylene Chloride --------------
Carbon Disulfide --------------
Methyl T-Butyl Ether --0.16J 0.12J 0.14J --0.16J --
1, 1-Dichloroethene --------------
1, 1-Dichloroethane ----0.12J 0.18J ------
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene --------------
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene 1.1 0.67 1.0J 1.6 0.26J 0.88 0.77J
Methyl Ethyl Ketone ----8.SJ --------
Chloroform ----0.14J 0.15J --0.14J --
Benzene --------------
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane --------------
Cyclohexane --------------
1 ,2-Dichloroethane --0.44J --0.48J 0.42J 0.52 --
ITrichloroethene 14 8.6 12J 16 --7.8 7.3
Methylcyclohexane --------------
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone --------------
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene --------------
rroluene ----2.3J --------
Tetrachloroethene --0.36J 0.36J 0.44J --0.39J · --
Ethylbenzene --------------
tTotal Xylenes --------------
Bromoform --------------
1,3-Dichlorobenzene --------------
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene --------------
1v,1sce11aneous c;ompounas
I I I I I I I I
Unknown(s) --------------
Benzene, 1,3,5-Trimethyl --------------
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethyl --------------
Cyclotetrasiloxane, Octamethyl --------------
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during the baseline sampling event are included in this table.
J = estimated value; N = presumptive evidence of material; U = not detected at or above the reporting limit
A= Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
Bolded values exceed ROD Performance Standard~
Sample$ were analyzed following CLP protocol.
•· indicates not detected above the reporting limit
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\Feb05SemiannuaIRpt-tbls.xls 3-16
Feh-05
--
--
--
--
--
0.15J
--
--
--
0.93
--
--
--
--
--
--
9.4
--
--
--
--
0.34J
--
--
--
--
--
I
1 4J
------
-- -
---- - -- - - -- -----Table 3-4
LTRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample ID: MW-10
2634
Location: Skyland
Date Sampled: Apr-02 Scp-02 r>ec-02 i\lar-OJ Au~-OJ
Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1)
Chloromethane .. .. 0.45JB
1, 1-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
!Acetone .. .. -·
Methylene Chloride .. .. ..
Carbon Disulfide .. .. ..
Methyl T-Butyl Ether .. ·-..
1, 1-0ichloroethene .. .. ..
1, 1-0ichloroethane .. .. ..
1trans 1,2-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
cis 1 ,2-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
Methyl Ethyl Ketone .. .. ..
Chloroform .. .. ..
Benzene .. .. ..
1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane .. .. ..
Cyclohexane .. .. ..
1,2-Dichloroethane .. .. ..
t'frichloroethene .. 0.16J 0.15J
Methylcyclohexane .. .. ..
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone .. .. ..
lcis-1,3-0ichloropropene .. .. ..
t'foruene .. .. 1.1
IT etrachloroethene .. 0.18J 0.20J
Ethylbenzene .. .. ..
(Total Xylenes .. .. ..
Bromoform .. .. ..
1,3-Dichlorobenzene .. .. ..
1,4-0ichlorobenzene .. .. ..
m1sce11aneous compounds
I I I
Unknown(s) .. .. ..
Benzene, 1,3,S·Trimethyl .. .. ..
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethyl .. .. ..
Cyclotetrasiloxane, Octamethyl .. .. ..
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during
J indicates estimated value; N indicates presumptive evidence of
..
..
..
..
..
0. t 1J
. .
..
..
. .
..
..
..
. .
..
..
0.16J
..
..
. .
. .
0.24J
..
..
..
..
..
I
..
..
.. ..
A= Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
Balded values exceed ROD Performance Standards
SamPles were analyzed following CLP protocol.
•· indicates not detected above the reporting limit
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\FebOSSemlannualRpt-tbls.xls 3-17
..
. .
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
. .
..
..
. .
..
..
. .
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
. .
..
I
. .
..
. .
..
Fch-0-1 AuJ!-04 Fch-05
.. .. . .
.. .. . .
. . .. ..
.. . . . .
.. .. . .
.. .. . .
.. .. . .
. . .. . .
. . .. . .
. . .. . .
.. .. . .
.. .. . .
.. . . . .
.. .. . .
.. .. ..
.. .. . .
. . .. ..
.. .. . .
. . .. . .
.. .. . .
.. .. . .
0.24J .. . .
.. .. . .
.. .. . .
.. .. . .
. . .. . .
.. .. . . '
I I I I
. . .. 8 OJ . . .. . .
. . .. ..
. . .. 27NJ
---
--- - -- - - - ---- - - -Table 3-4
LTRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample ID:
Location:
Date Sampled: Apr-02 Scp-02 Dcc-02
Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1)
Chloromethane ----0.52JB
1, 1-Dichloroethene ------
Acetone 11 ----
Methylene Chloride ------
Carbon Disulfide ------
Methyl T-Butyl Ether --0.47J 0.62J
1, 1-Dichloroethene ------
1, 1-0ichloroethane ------
rans 1,2-Dichloroethene ------
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene ------
Methyl Ethyl Ketone ------
Chloroform ------
Benzene ------
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane ------
Cyclohexane ------
1,2-Dichloroethane ------
ITrichloroethene ------
Methylcyclohexane ------
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone ------
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ------
!Toluene ------
If etrachloroethene ----0.11J
Ethylbenzene ------
!Total Xylenes ------
Bromoform ------
1,3-0ichlorobenzene ------
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ------
,.,,,scenaneous compounas
I I I
Unknown(s) ------
Benzene, 1,3,5-Trimethyl ------
Cyclotrisiloxane. Octamethyl ------
Cyclotetrasiloxane, Octamethy1 ------
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during
J indicates estimated value; N indicates presumptive evidence of
MW-11
2506
Briar Oak
i\lar-0J Aug-OJ
----
----
----
----
----
0.36J 0.29J
----
----
----
--·-
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
0.11J --
----
----
----
----
----
I I ----
----
----
----
A= Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
Bolded values exceed ROD Performance Standards
Samples were analyzed following CLP protocol.
•-indicates not detected above the reporting limit
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\FebOSSemiannualRpt-tbls.xls 3-18
Fch-04 Aug-04 Fch-05
------------
------
------
------
----0.16J
------
------
------------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
0.17J ----
------
------
------
------
------
I I I I
----10J
------
----1 7NJ
----39NJ
-- -
- - - - - -- --- - - - - --Table 3-4
L TRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample ID:
Location:
Date Sampled: Apr-02 Scp-02
Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1)
Chloromethane ----
1, 1-Dichloroethene ----
Acetone ----
Methylene Chloride ----
Carbon Disulfide ----
Methyl T-Butyl Ether ----
1, 1-Dichloroethene .. --
1, 1-0ichloroethane ----
trans 1 ,2-Dichloroethene ----
cis 1 ,2-Dichloroethene ----
Methyl Ethyl Ketone ----
Chloroform ----
Benzene ----
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 0.38J --
Cyclohexane ----
1,2-0ichloroethane ----
tTrichloroethene 3.0 2.3
Methylcyclohexane ----
Methyl tsobutyl Ketone ----
ICis-1,3-Dichloropropene ----
tToluene ----
~etrachloroethene 1.6 1.1
Ethylbenzene ----
lfotal Xylenes ----
Bromoform ----
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ----
1 .4-Dichlorobenzene ----
,v,1sce11aneous c;ompounas
I I I
Unknown(s) ----
Benzene, 1,3,S·Trimethyl ----
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethyl ----
Cyclotetrasiloxane, Octamethyl ----
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during
J indicates estimated value: N indicates presumptive evidence of
Dcc-02
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
2.1
--
--
--
--
0.45J
--
0.14J
--
--
0.12J
----
----
A = Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
Balded values exceed ROD Performance-Standards
Samples were analyzed following CLP protocol.
--indicates not detected above the reporting limit
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\Feb05SemiannuaIRpt-tbls.xls 3-19
MW-12
2719
DPR
i',lar-OJ Aug-OJ Fch-0-l AuJ!-0-l Fch-05
----------
.. --------
----15J ----
.. --.. ----
--.. ------
----.. ----
----.. ----
--.. ----
.. --------
.. ------
----7.2 ----
----------
.. --.. ----
----------
--------
.. --.. ----
2.4 1.5 3.5 2.0 2.2
----------
.. --.. ----
----------
----.. ----
0.79 0.88 1.4 1 .1 1.2
----.. ----
----------
.. --------
----.. ----
.. --------
I I I I I
.. ------2 OJ .. --------.. --------
--------7 ?NJ
---
I
- - - - - --- - ---- - - -Table 3-4
L TRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample ID: MW-13
2241
Location: Cedar Oak
Date Sampled: Apr-02 Scp-02 Dcc-02
Volatile Organ;c Compounds (ugll)
Chloromethane .. .. ..
1, 1-0ichloroethene .. 0.15J ..
Acetone .. .. ..
Methylene Chloride .. .. ..
Carbon Disulfide .. .. ..
Methyl T-Butyl Ether .. .. ..
1, 1-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
1, 1-Dichloroethane .. .. ..
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
cis 1 ,2-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
Methyl Ethyl Ketone .. .. ..
Chloroform .. .. ..
Benzene .. .. ..
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane .. .. ..
Cyclohexane .. .. ..
1,2-Dichloroethane .. .. ..
Trichloroethene .. .. ..
Methylcyclohexane .. .. ..
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone .. .. 0.16J
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .. .. ..
!Toluene 0.17J 0.19J 0.59
IT etrachloroethene .. .. ..
Ethyl benzene .. -· ..
Total Xylenes .. ·-0.29J
Bromoform .. .. 0.20JB
1,3-Dichlorobenzene -· .. ..
1,4-Dichlorobenzene .. .. 0.12J
m1sceuaneous <,;ompounas
I I I
Unknown(s) .. .. ..
Benzene. 1,3,5-Trimethyl .. .. ..
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethyl .. .. ..
Cyclotetrasiloxane. Octamethyl .. .. ..
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during
J indicates estimated value; N indicates presumptive evidence of
Scp-02
·-
..
..
·-
·-
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
0.49J
..
..
..
..
-·
..
..
..
..
..
II
..
..
..
..
A = Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates:
Balded values exceed-ROD Performance Standards
Samples were analyzed following CLP protocol.
--indicates not detected above the reporting limit
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\Feb05Semiannua1Rpt-tbls.xls 3-20
MW-14
2403
DPR
Dcc-02 ~lar-OJ Aul,!-OJ Fch-04 Au!,!-0.i
.. -· .. ·--·
.. -· .. .. ..
.. .. .. 14J 30
.. .. .. .. ..
.. . . .. .. ..
.. . . .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. ..
.. .. . . .. ..
.. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. 6.9 ..
.. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. . .
.. .. . . .. ..
. . .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. ..
0.28J 0.27J 0.25J 0.22J ..
.. . . .. .. ..
.. ·-.. .. ..
.. .. .. .. . .
.. .. .. . . ..
.. .. .. .. ..
.. .. . . .. ..
.. .. .. -· ..
0.20JB .. .. . . ..
.. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. ..
I I I I I I
.. .. .. .. . .
.. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. . . . .
.. .. .. ·-..
---
Fcb-05
..
. .
. .
. .
..
. .
. .
..
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
..
. .
. .
..
. .
..
. .
..
. .
..
..
·-
..
. .
I
1 3J
. .
0 97NJ
23NJ
- -- - - --- --- - - ---Table 3-4
L TRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample ID:
Location:
Date Sampled: Scp-02 Occ-02 ~far-OJ
Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/I)
Chloromethane --0.1 lJB --
1, 1-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
l,Acetone .. .. ..
Methylene Chloride .. .. 2.0J
Carbon Disulfide .. .. . .
Methyl T-Butyl Ether 0.25J 0.16J ..
1, 1-Dichloroethene .. .. . .
1, 1-Dichloroethane 0.20J 0.17J ..
rans 1,2-Dichloroethene .. 0.25J ..
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene 3.6 2.6 3.6
Methyl Ethyl Ketone .. .. ..
Chloroform .. 0.22J ..
Benzene .. .. ..
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane .. .. ..
Cyclohexane .. .. 2.0J
1,2-Dichloroethane .. .. ..
ITrichloroethene 50 36 40
Methylcyclohexane .. .. ..
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone .. .. . .
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .. .. ..
tToluene .. .. ..
i1" etrachloroethene 0.31J 0.21J ..
Ethylbenzene .. O.lOJ ..
!fatal Xylenes .. 0.22J ..
Bromoform .. .. ..
1,3-0ichlorobenzene .. .. ..
1,4-Dichlorobenzene .. 0.23J ..
m1sceuaneous <.:ompounas
I I I
Unknown(s) .. .. ..
Benzene, 1,3,5-Trimethyl .. .. ..
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethyl .. .. ..
Cyclotetrasiloxane, Octamethyl .. .. ..
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during
J indicates estimated value: N indicates presumptive evidence of
I
A= Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
Bolded values exceed ROD Periormance Standards
Samples were analyzed following CLP protocol.
--indicates not detected above the reporting limit
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\Feb05SemiannuaIRpt-tbls.xls 3-21
MW-15
2232
Tate
Aug-0."\ Feh-0-1 Au~-0-t Feb-OS
.. ----..
. . . . .. ..
. . 15 .. . .
.. . . .. ..
.. . . .. ..
.. . . .. 0.09J
.. . . .. ..
.. 0.27J .. 0.22J
.. .. .. . .
2.8 4.9 3.3 3.6 . . 9.3 .. . .
.. . . .. . .
.. . . .. ..
.. . . .. . .
.. . . .. ..
. . .. .. . .
38 50 46 39
.. . . .. . .
.. .. . . ..
. . .. .. . .
.. . . .. . .
0.21J 0.22J .. 0.30J
.. . . .. . .
.. . . .. ..
.. .. .. . .
.. . . .. ..
. . .. .. . .
I I I I
.. . . .. 3.6J
.. . . ..
.. . . .. . .
.. . . .. . .
- - -
------ - - - - - -----Table 3-4
L TRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample ID:
Location:
Date Sampled: Scp-02 Dcc-02 ;\for.OJ
Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1)
Chloromethane --.. ..
1, 1-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
Acetone .. .. ..
Methylene Chloride .. .. ..
Carbon Disulfide 0.29J 0.30J ..
Methyl T-Butyl Ether .. .. ..
1, 1-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
1, 1 ~Dichloroethane .. .. ..
trans 1,2-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
Methyl Ethyl Ketone .. .. ..
Chloroform .. .. ..
Benzene .. .. ..
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane .. .. ..
Cyclohexane .. .. ..
1,2-Dichloroethane .. .. ..
ITrichloroethene .. .. . .
Methylcyclohexane .. .. ..
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone .. .. ..
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .. .. ..
fToluene .. .. ..
IT etrach!oroethene .. .. ..
Ethyl benzene .. .. . .
!Total Xylenes .. .. ..
Bromoform .. .. ..
1,3-Dichlorobenzene .. .. ..
1,4-0ichlorobenzene 0.33J 0.20J 0.30J
... 1sce11aneous l,Ompounas
I I I
Unknown(s) .. .. -·
Benzene, 1,3,5-Trimethyl .. .. ..
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethyl .. .. ..
Cyclotetrasiloxane, Octamethyt .. .. ..
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during
J indicates estimated value; N indicates presumptive evidence of
i
A= Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average· of replicates.
Balded values exceed ROD Periormance Standards
Samples were analyzed following CLP protocol.
--indicates not detected above the reporting limit
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\Feb0SSemiannualApt-tbls.xls :i-22
MW-16
2725
Puritan
,\ui:-OJ Fch-0-1 Aug-0-1 Feh-05
0.24J .. .. ..
.. . . .. . .
2.2J .. .. . .
.. .. .. . .
0.28J .. .. . .
.. . . .. . .
. . . . .. ..
. . .. .. . .
.. .. .. . .
.. . . .. . .
.. . . .. . .
.. .. ·-. .
.. . . .. . .
. . . . .. ..
.. .. .. . .
.. . . .. . .
.. . . .. ..
.. . . .. . .
.. . . .. ..
. . .. .. . .
. . .. .. . .
.. . . .. . .
.. . . .. . .
.. . . .. . .
.. . . .. . .
. . 0.35J .. . .
.. 0.34J .. ..
I I I I
.. . . .. 3 2J .. . . .. . .
.. . . .. . .
.. . . .. 9 3NJ
- - -
- - - - -- - -
1]111111 --- - ---Table 3-4
L TRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample ID:
Location:
Date Samolcd: Apr-02 Sep-02 Dec-02
Volatile Organic Compounds (ugh)
Chloromethane .. .. 0.40JB
1, 1-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
Acetone .. .. ..
Methylene Chloride .. .. ..
Carbon Disulfide .. .. ..
Methyl T-Butyl Ether .. 0.47J ..
1, 1-0ichloroethene .. .. ..
1, 1-Dichloroethane .. .. ..
I,rans 1,2-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene .. .. 0.26J
Methyl Ethyl Ketone .. .. ..
Chloroform 0.31J 0.25JB 0.27J
Benzene .. .. ..
1 , 1 , 1-T richloroethane 0.65 0.47J 0.45J
Cyclohexane .. .. ..
1,2-Dichloroethane .. .. ..
tTrichloroethene 12 13 12J
Methylcyclohexane .. .. ..
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone .. .. ..
cls-1,3-Dichloropropene .. .. ..
IToluene .. .. ..
tr etrachloroethene 5,7 5.7 4.8J
Ethylbenzene .. .. ..
!Total Xylenes .. .. ..
Bromoform .. .. ..
1,3-Dichlorobenzene .. .. ..
1,4-Dichlorobenzene .. .. ..
,v,1sce11aneous compounds
I I I I
Unknown(s) .. ..
Benzene, 1,3,S•Trimethyl .. ..
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethyl .. ..
Cyclotetrasiloxane, Octamethyl .. ..
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during
J indicates estimated value; N indicates presumptive evidence of
MW-17
2816
DPR
i\lar-OJ Aug-0.~
.. 0.35J
1.6 0.60
.. . .
.. . .
.. ..
.. . .
.. . .
.. ..
.. . .
0.26J 0.78
. . ..
0.26J ..
.. ..
0.70 0.36J
.. ..
.. ..
14 8.8
.. ..
. . ..
.. ..
.. . .
6.2 4.2
.. ..
.. . .
.. ..
.. ..
.. ..
I
.. . .
.. . .
.. . .
.. ..
A= Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
Balded values exceed ROD Performance Standards
Samples were analyzed following CLP protocol.
•-indicates not detected above the reporting limit
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\FebOSSemiannualRpt·tbls.xls 3-23
Fcb-04 AU!!;-04 Fch-05
0.35J .. ..
0.98 .. . .
.. .. . .
.. .. . .
. . .. . .
.. .. . .
0.98 0.61J 0.88
. . .. . .
.. .. . .
.. .. ..
.. .. . .
.. .. 0.22J
. . .. . .
0.57 .. 0.50
. . .. . .
. . .. . .
17 12 12
. . .. . .
. . .. . .
.. .. . .
.. .. . .
9.0 6.5 5.3
. . .. . .
.. .. . .
. . .. . .
.. .. . .
. . .. . .
I I I I
.. .. ..
.. .. . .
.. .. . .
. . .. . .
---
---- -- - - - ---- --Table 3-4
L TRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample 10: MW-18
2800
Location: DPR
l>ntc Sampled: Apr-02 Sep-02 Uec-02 ;\lar-0., Aug-OJ
Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1}
Chloromethane .. .. ..
1, 1-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
Acetone .. .. ..
Methylene Chloride .. .. ..
Carbon Disulfide .. .. ..
Methyl T-Butyl Ether .. .. ..
1, 1-0ichloroethene .. .. ..
1, 1-Dichloroethane .. .. 0.11J
trans 1 ,2-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
Methyl Ethyl Ketone .. .. ..
Chloroform .. .. ..
Benzene .. .. ..
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane .. .. ..
Cyclohexane .. .. ..
1,2-Dichloroethane .. .. ..
tTrichloroethene 4.3 6.1 4.0J
Methylcyclohexane .. .. ..
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone .. .. ..
cis-1,3-0ichloropropene .. .. ..
!Toluene .. .. ..
~etrachloroethene 8.6 10 6.9J
Ethyl benzene .. .. ..
!Total Xylenes .. .. ..
Bromoform .. .. ..
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene .. .. ..
1 .4-Dichlorobenzene .. .. ..
,,.,,,sceuaneous c,;ompounas
I I I
Unknown(s) 5 4J .. ..
Benzene, 1,3,5-Trimethyl .. .. ..
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethyl .. .. ..
Cyclotetrasiloxane, Octamethyl 11NJ .. ..
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during·
J indicates estimated value: N indicates presumptive evidence of
. .
..
. .
. .
..
..
..
..
. .
0.21J
..
..
. .
..
..
..
4.4
..
..
. .
. .
9.1
..
. .
. .
..
..
I
..
..
. .
..
A= Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
Bolded values exceed ROD Periormance Standards
Samples were analyzed following CLP protocol.
--indicates not detected above the reporting limit
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\FebOSSemiannualRpt-tbls.xls
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
. .
..
..
4.4
..
..
..
..
10
..
..
..
..
..
I
. .
..
..
..
3-24
MW-19
2833
Penny Park
Feh-04 Aug-04 Feh-05 ;\lar-OJ Aug-OJ Fch-04
. . .. . . .. 0.44J ..
.. .. . . .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. . .
.. .. . . .. . . ..
.. .. . . .. .. ..
. . .. .. . . .. ..
.. .. .. .. . . ..
.. .. . . .. .. ..
.. .. . . .. .. . .
0.14J .. . . .. . . ..
. . .. . . .. .. . .
.. .. --.. .. . .
. . .. . . .. .. ..
.. . . .. .. .. ..
.. . . .. .. .. . .
0.15J . . .. .. .. ..
4.2 2.5 1.8 0.44J 0.24J 0.43J
.. .. . . .. .. ..
. . .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. . . .. .. ..
. . .. . . .. .. . .
9.9 6.0 3.9 0.36J 0.26J 0.39J
. . .. . . .. . . ..
. . .. .. .. . . ..
.. .. . . .. .. ..
.. . . .. .. .. ..
.. .. . . .. .. . .
I I I II I I I
.. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. . .
.. . . 1 4J .. .. ..
.. . . 0 72NJ .. .. ..
---
Aug-04 Fch-05
. . ..
. . ..
.. . .
.. . .
. . . .
. . ..
. . . .
.. . .
.. . .
.. . .
.. . .
.. . .
. . ..
.. . .
.. . .
.. . .
.. 0.25J
. . . .
.. . .
.. . .
.. . .
.. 0.25J
.. . .
.. . .
.. . .
.. . .
.. . .
I I
. . 21J
. .
. . 0 70NJ
.. . .
- - -- - - - ---- --- --Table 3-4
L TRA Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
April, September, December 2002; March, August 2003; February, August 2004, and February 2005
Sample ID: MW-20
2416
Location: Skyland
Date Sampled: Aug-OJ Fcb-04 Aug-0-1
Volatile Organic Compounds (ug/1)
Chloromethane -· .. ..
1, 1-Dichloroethene -· .. ..
Acetone 5.1 .. 10A
Methylene Chloride .. .. ..
Carbon Disulfide .. .. ..
Methyl T-Butyl Ether 77 84 64A
1, 1-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
1, t -Dichloroethane .. .. ..
rans 1 ,2-0ichloroethene .. .. ..
cis 1,2-Dichloroethene .. .. ..
Methyl Ethyl Ketone .. .. ..
Chloroform .. .. . .
Benzene .. .. ..
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane .. .. ..
Cyclohexane .. .. ..
1,2-Dichloroethane .. .. ..
tTrichloroethene .. .. . .
Methylcyclohexane .. .. ..
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone .. .. ..
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene .. ·-..
!Toluene 0.48J 0.42J ..
IT etrachloroethene 0.90 .. ..
Ethylbenzene .. 0.31J 1.1A
!Total Xylenes .. 0.48J ..
Bromoform .. -· ..
1,3-Dichlorobenzene .. -· ..
1,4-Dichlorobenzene .. -· ..
IVIISCellaneous compounas
Unknown(s) .. .. ·-
Benzene, 1,3,5-Trimethyl -· .. ·-
Cyclotrisiloxane, Octamethy1 .. ·-..
Cyctotetrasiloxane, Octamethyl -· .. ..
Note:
Only constituents that were detected in at least one sample during
J indicates estimated value; N indicates presumptive evidence of
Feh-O::
..
..
..
. .
..
70
. .
..
. .
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
0.35J
..
1.1
1.2
..
..
..
15J
0.55NJ
1.7NJ
19NJ
A= Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is •average· of replicates.
Balded values exceed ROD Performance Standards
Samples were analyzed following CLP protocol.
--indicates not detected above the reporting limit
K:\20064\205\Second Semiannual 3rd year\Feb0SSemiannualRpt-tbls.xls 3-25
MW-21
2419
Skyland
Au.u-O.' Feh-0-1 Aug-0-1 Feb-05
~
. . .. .. ..
.. . . .. . .
6.3 28J 12 ..
.. . . .. . .
.. . . .. . .
2.3 2.6 .. ..
.. .. .. . .
.. . . .. . .
.. . . .. . .
. . . . .. ..
. . 6.2 7.1 . .
.. . . .. ..
.. . . .. . .
. . .. .. . .
.. .. .. . .
.. . . .. . .
0.90 0.91 .. ..
.. . . .. . .
.. .. . . . .
.. . . .. ..
0.74 1.1 -· ..
0.44J 0.35J .. . .
.. 0.48J 0.90J 1.1
.. 2 -· 1.6
... .. .. . .
.. .. .. ·-
.. -· .. ..
I I I I I
.. .. .. 0.98J .. .. .. ..
.. . . .. ..
.. . . .. 3.2NJ
---
[Ill) - - -.. --------.. .. ----0
0
D
D
APRVD. DA TE:
(l
0
D
REVISION
~ C> 0 ◊ <) 0 ◊ \) ~ \) () 0 ~ ~ \> \) \) ® i\ ~. 0 ~ ~p l~ ~ 0 CJ -..\ '3>® D
0
0
D
I:'\
'0
0 i D
0 io D 0
,.\® ~ D o~~o 0
<?
' ,®i\
'· ·-
□
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
GASTONIA, GASTON COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
TCE CONCENTRATIONS IN
GROUNDWATER FEBRUARY 2005
FIGURE 3-2
D
() ~ ◊ \') 0 lj 0 0 I:'\ \J \). d G D 0
0
D
IT
D ~D D lo D i □ CJ D 0 D 'i)
D
• ~ D C
D ~ □ C m
D
□ □
D □ D □ D
-
DRAWN· DATE:
J. MILLER 6/5/02
LAYOUT CADD FILE:
Fi -3-2 FIGS.dwg
0 G ~ =
ff< 0
0 0
0
0 0 'I 0
~
3/\l"!lO Ol:10~.Ul'O'H
-... z -2
r '" -, "' z G) "' c; 0 ;q 0 r _, z I r 0 r r 0 0 0 c; ;u 0 -,
0 )> c;
c; 0 -, cj -,
I 0 "" "' z 0 z
"' 0 0 z
0
"' z -, ;u
)> -,
6 z
V,
z
C
~
'-r
W,O. NO.:
20064-138-100-0930
SHEET: OF
1
- --. 1!!!!11 --111!!!!1 l!!!!!!!I 11111 m!!!I l!!!!!!!!lll .. ---\) 0
0
0
Cl
Q
Cl -.VJ 0
9, \
~~~
CJ~gs
' 1
' '
APRVD. DA TE: REVISION
0
0 0
0
0
1,\
0
□
0
D
,.\ 0 -~~
\)
\j
0
n D
~o
~ 0
D
(;>
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
GASTONIA, GASTON COUNTY,
NORTH CAROLINA
PCE CONCENTRATIONS IN
GROUNDWATER FEBRUARY 2005
FIGURE 3-3
□
D'
D ~□ D z lo
D z
~□ C
CJ m
D D D 'i)
D D
D<:) D D OQ
~ ~
0~ !i
D \j \) 0 \j \J (/J 0 % %.D ~ \} \\:\ D D \'I 0 \j ~ D u =
8 0
<)Q
<:>..,,..,,,,
D ~ • 0 ~ □ 0
! □ D C I m
D n
D " □
□ □ 3N~O m:IO:lHIVH
□ □ -----
z ~ ♦ z !:\ -D
r
z ., fl, f'1 z G) 0 f'1 0 f'1 ., ;rj r ., z
► r D V, () r D ► f'1 a: I 0 ;;1 " r ()
r 0 ► ()
f'1 ,, cj ;;1 D 0 0 f'1 z D .,
I
f'1 z f'1
()
0 z
()
f'1 z
;rj
► cj
0 z
V,
z
C "' ~
DRAWN: DATE: W.O. NO.:
J. MILLER 6 5 02 20064-138-100-0930
LAYOUT: CADD FILE: SHEET: OF
Fig-3-3 davispark.dwg 1 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA,. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 3
Revision: O
Date: May 2005
detected in groundwater sampled from MW-I 8, located near the south southeastern corner or the
site.
TCE and PCE concentrations decreased slightly in all or the wells sampled in the Fchruary 2005
sampling event when compared to the August 2004 groundwater sampling results. PCE and TCE
concentrations in groundwater have generally remained stable or decreased at sampling locations
during the first three years 01· the Davis Park Road TCE Site LTRA. There arc two areas where
PCE and TCE concentrations continue to exceed guidance concentrations. One area is
downgradient or the original groundwater contaminant plume center at the southern and eastern
portion of the site. The second area is located in the central and western portion or the site. PCE
and TCE concentrations in both these locations remain lower than historical detections in the
former plume center.
Trace concentrations of PCE that were previously detected in groundwater sampled from
locations west and north or the former plume boundaries were not confirmed during the August
2004 or current (February 2005) sampling event. Pumping from community wells in this area
docs not appear to be causing significant migration of the contaminant plume in this direction.
MTBE was detected in the following samples: MW-3 (11 µg/1), MW-7 (0.231 µg/1), MW-8
(0.421 µg/1), MW-9 (0.151 µg/1), MW-I I (0.161 µg/1), MW-15 (0.091 µg/1), MW-17 (0.88 µg/1)
and MW-20 (70 µg/1). MTBE concentrations have generally remained stahle or decreased
during the first three years of LTRA. The ROD Performance Standard or 200 ftg/1 for MTBE
has not historically been exceeded and five of the seven detections during the current sampling
event are estimated values below the reporting limit.
K:\20064\205\Second semi;mnual 3rd year\Feb05Semiannua1Rpl.doc 3-28 RFW205-2A-AT JK
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc .. expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
SECTION 4
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 4
Revision: O
Date: May 2005
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 LTRA RESULTS SUMMARY
The source for the TCE/PCE cont"rnin"tion in groundwater at the Davis Park Road TCE Site is
depleted or rernoved based on groundwater sampling results reported from the tirne of
contaminant discovery ( 1990) to the current February 2005 LTRA semiannual sampling event.
Water sampled from wells north of Skyland Drive (MW-5, MW-14) and in the Cedar Oak Circle
Subdivision (MW-12) contained concentrations of between 44 and 134 ~tg/1 TCE and up to 24
µg/1 PCE when sampled in 1990. Water sampled from MW-5 and MW-14 in February 2005 did
not contain concentrations of TCE or PCE above the reporting limit. Water sampled fro1i1 MW-
12 contained TCE at 2.2 µg/1 and PCE at 1.2 µg/1. Figures 4-1 through 4-3 graphically depict the
decreased levels of COCs in these wells.
TCE and PCE concentrations in all wells have generally decreased over time, with the exception
of the areas southwest central and south southeast of the site. Groundwater sampled from
monitor well MW-I 5, located southwest of the source area, contained 39 µg/1 TCE during the
current sampling event. Excluding this groundwater sample, the maximum TCE concentration
for groundwater samples collected this sampling event is 12 µg/1 in groundwater sampled from
well MW-I 7. The maximum PCE ·concentration is 5.3 µg/1, also detected in groundwater
sampled from well MW-17. Monitor well MW-17 is located on the southeast portion of the site
approaching Blackwood Creek, suggesting groundwater contamination continues to attenuate as
it migrates toward this natural groundwater discharge area.
K:\20064\205\Sncond semiannual 3rd ye.ir\Fetl05Semiannua1Rpl doc 4-1 RFW205-2A-AT JK
- -
~
Q)
C: Q) .c -Q) e
_Q
.c u ·.::: I-
--
1000
100
10
1
0.1
------ --
Figure 4-1
Trichloroethane Concentration vs. Time
2419 Davis Park Road, MW-5
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Gastonia, North Carolina
- - - -- -
------------------------------------------------
(ROD Remediation Goal = 2.8 µg/1)
Feb-90 Mar-91 Mar-92 Apr-93 May-94 Jun-95 Jul-96 Aug-97 Aug-98 Sep-99 Oct-00 Nov-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Jan-05 Feb-06
Date
K:\20064\205\SE!condSemi3rdYear\table-figures\table_figures.xls\fig4-1
-
- - - --
100
10
c,
~
Q)
C: Q) .s::;
ai
0 ~
.2 .s::; u ·;::
f-
1
f r
0.1
--- - -
Figure 4-2
Trichloroethene Concentration vs. Time
2403 Davis Park Road, MW-14
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Gastonia, North Carolina
(ROD Remediation Goal = 2.8 µg/1)
- -- - - -
Feb-90 Mar-91 Mar-92 Apr-93 May-94 Jun-95 Jul-96 Aug-97 Aug-98 Sep-99 Oct-00 Nov-01 Dec-02 Dec-03 Jan-05 Feb-06
Date
K :\20064 \ 138\ Third Ouarter\table _fig ures.xls\fig4-2
-
- -
CJ ~
Q)
C
Q) .c <ii e
.2 .c 0 ·.:
I-
- - - ------- - -
10
0.1
• -. ♦ .. " .
Figure 4.3
Trichloroethane and Tetrachloroethene Concentration vs. Time
2719 Davis Park Road, MW-12
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Gastonia, North Carolina
.................. ·
♦
---------------------------------------------~----(ROD Remediation Goal for TCE = 2.8 µg/1)
(ROD Remediation Goal for PCE = 1 µg/1)
--
Feb·90 Mar•91 Mar•92 Apr•93 May•94 Jun•95 JuI•96 Aug•97 Aug•98 Sep•99 Oct•00 Nov•01 Dec·02 Dec·03 Jan•05 Feb•06
Date
K:\20064\138\Third Quarter\table_figures.xls\fig4-3
- - -
1--•··PCEI
■ TCE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 4
Revision: O
Date: May 2005
Concurrently with the migration toward Blackwood Creek, the August 2003 and February 2004
sampling data indicated a contaminant migration southwest or the source area, as evidenced by
groundwater elevations and the detection of trace TCE and PCE concentrations in groundwater
sampled from the western side or the site. However, the August 2004 and February 2005
sampling results show no detections of TCE or PCE on the west side or the site. Although
pumping or groundwater has been discontinued over most of the Davis Park Road TCE Site area,
two community wells (MW-10 and MW-I I) arc currcmly "ill active near Briar Oak Drive. west
of the site. Community well MW-10, located on Skyland Drive, supplies between 30 and 40
people, and MW-I I, located on Briar Oak Drive, supplies approximately nine people, according
to Mr. Doc Thompson of the Gaston County Health Department. Pumping of these wells may
facilitate migration of groundwater contaminants in a westerly direction. Monitoring wells MW-
20 and MW-21 were installed in the area between the contaminant plume and the community
wells, to monitor for potential migration of the contaminant plume. These wells arc located
. between MW-15 (the well with the highest TCE concentration) and the currently pumping
community wells. The data from sampling wells MW-20 and MW-21 do not currently indicate
that COCs in groundwater are migrating toward the pumping wells.
Monitor well MW-15 is located southwest or the source area, with Davis Park Road to the east
and well MW-9 to the southwest. Concentrations ofTCE detected in monitor well MW-15 have
lluctuated between 36 µg/1 and 50 µg/1 since September 2002 (sec Figure 4-4), similar to
historical levels detected in groundwater sampled from converted community well MW-12
(located cast and downgradient or the source area) (sec Figure 4-3). TCE concentrations
lluctuated between approximately 30 and 50 µg/1 in groundwater sampled from MW-12 from
1990 through 1998. TCE was detected at 2.2 µg/1 in groundwater sampled from MW-12 during
this groundwater sampling event. TCE concentrations in groundwater sampled from well MW-9
(currently supplied with a carbon filtration unit) have lluctuatcd since August 2000 when first
K:\200641205\Second semiannual 3rd year\Feb05Semiannua1Rpt.doc 4-5 RFW205-2A-AT JK
--- - - - --- --- -- -
'a,
~
a,
C a, .c -a, e
.2 .c u ·;:
I-
100
Figure 4-4
Trichloroethene and Tetrachloroethene Concentration vs. Time
2232 Tate Street, MW-15
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Gastonia, North Carolina
-■ ------------'\r-.-■------■
10
♦•
0.1
Jan-98
(ROD Remediation Goal for TCE = 2.8 µg/1)
(ROD Remediation Goal for PCE·,; 1·µg/l) .•
Aug-98 Apr-99 Dec-99 Aug-00 Mar-01 Nov-01
Date
. ·•.
Jul-02 Feb-03 Oct-03
K:\20064\ 138\Third Quarter\table_figures.x1s\fig4-4
---■
Jun-04 Feb-05
- - -
1 · .•.. PCE I
■ TCE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 4
Revision: 0
Date: May 2005
sampled, but have ranged from 6.8 µg/1 (detected in November 2001) to 16 µg/1 (detected in
March 2003). These levels arc similar to groundwater samples collected from wells MW-17 and
MW-I 8, located further south and downgradient of the source area toward Blackwood Creek.
4.2 CONCLUSIONS
TCE and PCE concentrations continue to decrease in the contaminant plume as it migrates south
and away from the source area. No additional degradation products of these two constituents
were detected at any significant level in any of the groundwater samples collected historically or
during the LTRA quarterly/semiannual sampling events. Graphs of historical TCE and PCE
concentrations from key monitoring wells arc presented as Figures 4-1 through 4-6. Figures 4-1
through 4-3 shows the decline of COCs in groundwater sampled near the original plume center
from levels well above EPA MCLs to levels either approaching or consistently below the MCLs
and ROD Remediation Goals from 1990 through the current sampling event. Figures 4-4 through
4-6 illustrate the fluctuating COC levels in wells located at and downgradient of the current
plume center. These values are significantly lower than levels detected at the plume center in the
early 1990s, following discovery of the plume. Figures 4-1 through 4-6 support the groundwater
concept model (EPA Memorandum, 25 September 2000) that the primary mechanism for the
observed natural attenuation of the TCE plume at Davis Park Road is dilution as contamination
essentially flushes through the bedrock aquifer. The analytical results arc consistent with the
proposed cleanup time of 13 years (by the year 2017) to attain EPA MC Ls.
In conclusion, the February. 2005 Semiannual LTRA sampling event results confirmed that
natural attenuation is occurring at rates according to expectations, no changing conditions have
arisen that might reduce efficacy of this remedy, no toxic and/or mobile transformation products
arc being produced, the plume is not expanding, there is no impact downgradicnt, there 1s no
evidence of a new release, and source area wells have attained remediation objectives.
K:\200641205\Second semiannual 3rd year\Feb05Semiannua1Rpt.doc 4-7 RFW205·2A-AT JK
--- - - -
100
10
-
-- -- - - -
Figure 4-5
Trichloroethene and Tetrachloroethene Concentration vs. Time
2639 Springbrook Street, MW-9
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Gastonia, North Carolina
- -
'a, 1 ~ .,
C: .,
.c -., e 0
.c u ·;:;
I-
--♦-----------------•---♦-~-• --+--+-----♦---------♦-----------------------.-----------·---(ROD Remediation Goal for TCE = 2.8 µg/1) •
0.1
(ROD Remediation Goal for PCE = 1 µg/1)
0.01
0.001
Jun-00 Oct-00 Feb-01 Jun-01 Oct-01 Feb-02 Jun-02 Oct-02 Feb-03 Jun-03 Oct-03 Feb-04 Jun-04 Sep-04 Jan-05 May-05
Date
K:\20064\138\Third Quarter\table_figures.xls\fig4-5
- - -
1--♦--PCE I
■ TCE
--
c,
-=> a,
C: a, .c: -a, e E .c: u ·.:: f-
- -- - ------
Figure 4-6
Trichloroethene and Tetrachloro·ethene Concentration vs. Time
2816 Davis Park Road, MW-17
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Gastonia, North Carolina
- -
100 ~---------------------------------------
10r: -____ -_____ -__ -__ -------~~~~-~
(ROD Remediation Goal for TCE = 2.8 µg/1)
(ROD Remediation Goal for PCE = 1 µg/1)
0.1
Jan-98 Aug-98 Apr-99 Dec-99 Aug-00 Mar-01 Nov-01
Date
-.. --.. ..
Jul-02 Feb-03 Oct-03 Jun-04 Feb-05
K:\20064\138\Third Ouarter\table_figures.xls\fig4-6
- --
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, lnc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
4.3 RECOMMENDATIONS
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: 4
Revision: 0
Date: May 2005
Analytical results from quarterly and semiannual sampling of the monitor well network at the
Davis Park Road Site indicate decreasing levels of COCs. Perimeter wells located outside !he
plume continue to monitor for potential migration of plume constituents. PDBs continue to
provide representative _samples of the principle COCs in groundwater at the Davis Park Road
Sile. while al !he same lime being more easily i111plc1ncnled and cos1-cllec1ivc than low-flow
sampling methods. It is recommended that PDBs continue 10 be used to sample accessible wells,
and that sampling frequency be reduced to annually for the duration of the LTRA. Additionally,
!he owner of monitor well MW-14, localed north and upgradienl of !he current contaminant
plume, requested permission lo abandon the monitor well on her property al 2404 Davis Park
Road. Because samples from this well have not contained COCs at levels exceeding the
reporting limit since LTRA sampling began in September 2002, it was agreed this well is no
longer necessary to the monitor well network. It is recommended that MW-14 be removed from
the LTRA monitoring program and that MW-14 be abandoned.
It is also recommended that well condition be recorded during each sampling event using the
format provided in Table 4-1. During the current sampling event, several monitor wells in the
L TRA network were observed to be in need of minor repairs (sec Table 4-1 ). Additionally, in
order to minimize the chance that access to any given well in the monitor well network is denied
during future annual site visits, it is recommended that a letter be sent by EPA to the property
owners a week or two in advance, informing them of the expected sampling date, and in order to
ensure location of all remaining monitor wells during future sampling events it is recommended
that they be located with a Global Positioning System (GPS) unit.
K:120064\205\Second semiannual 3rd year\Feb05Semiannua1Rpt.doc 4-10 RFW205-2A-AT JK
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly tor EPA. It shall no1 be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written permission o1 EPA.
S:amplc Ill
MW-7
MW-8
MW-10
i\·lW-11
MW-12
~-lW-13
MW-14
t-.·1\V-15
r-.tW-16
MW-17
MW-18
MW-19
MW-20
MW-21
monitor well
monitor well
moni1or well
rnonilor wdl
carbon unit
carhon unit
carbon unit
carhon unit
caihon unit
nmm1unity well
CO!lllllllllil)' we)]
L'\l!l\'erled well
L'\lll\'Crlcd well
t"OJJ\'ertcd well
nin,·cned well
private
private
private
private
monitor well
monitor well
Tahle4-l
Monitor Well Physical Conditions
L TRA Monitor Well Sampling Network
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Former Dcsigm1tion(s) Street Address
MW-JD
rv1W-2D
MW-3D
iVlW-41)
CO-I. PW-2. 121
CO-13. 235
298
252
182
co-2. :mo
CU-3. 2(i!J
CW-5
CW-6
CW-4.49
CW-7. 175
CO-5. 195
C0-14. 286
192
·277
S of Cedar Oak
2816 Davis !'ark
Lcndora Dri vc
2415 Skyland
2419 Davis !'ark
2717 Davis Park
2819 Davb Park
2400 Skyland
2639 Springhrook
2634 Skyland
Briar 0:11.;
Cedar Oak Suhdivision
2719 Da\'is Park
Cedar 0:ik Suhdivisi\ln
224 I Cedar Oal,;
2403 Davis l'ml
2232 Tate
2725 Puritan
2816 Davis Park
2800 Davis Park
2833 Penny Park
Lcndora Drive (north of Skyland)
Lendora Drive (south of Skvland)
4-11
K:\20064\205\Second Semianmml 3rd year\Feb0SSerniannualRp!•ttJ!s.x\s
Well Condition
Fchru:iry 2005
needs new gasket
needs new gasket
needs new gasket
needs new gasket
good
could not access
good
good
good
good
needs new spigot handle
good
no longer sampled
Rcrnmmcndcd for ahandon111c11t
needs new gasket
good
good
good
good
good
•ood
Dcplh
(reel below
•rmmd surface
75
54
150
142
187
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unkrn)Wll
Unknown
270
112
125
74
1--1.'i
U11known
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
173
135
.. , .. . .. . '.' ~ ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or ln part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
APPENDIX A
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: Appendices
Revision: O
Date: May 2005
LOG NOTES/FIELI> WATER QUALITY DATA SHEETS
K:\200G41205\Second semiannual 3rd year1Feb05SemiannuaIRptdoc RFW205-2A-AT JK
/2
I
I WESTONW.O. NO. ______ _ Dale O"l. \o d o5
WELL EVACUATION/SAMPLING FORM
I GE;NERAL INFORMATION
Well No.: MW -\ Weather: -~---• L . Lin '"'-
Sampling Team: -~, ~"i, . D -. -Sampler's Signalure: y_.L._,
I
I
WELL MEASUREMENTS -
Protecti\te casing: I I Damaged Comments:
Locked: ti I NO
Concrete Base: I Damaged
Casing Diameter: ; n., Jin., HI .. Gin., Bin. Stickup Height
WELL EVACUATION INFORMATION
I A. Total Oeplll (fop of Casing = TOC): Wen Evacuation Method (baiter. submersible pump)
2 ~1-, -B. Depth 10 Wai,,, (DTW) (J'OC):
C. Column of Standing Waler (C=A·B): Begin Well Evacuation (rune):
I 0. Purge Faclor. ~ Evacuation Rate (9pm): ,
(2in.:0.16, 3in.:0.3 , 4in .. :0, , Sin.:1.47, 8in.:2.:1)
Orav.<lawn Observed (It):
E. · One Weil Volume (gal/LF) (E=CxO): -stop Evacuati:,n (Time/Reason):
I F. # Volumes to De Purged (3): Restart Time:
G. Total Gallons to be E:vacuated (G=FxE): Well Pumped Dry: YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS
I Time: ...._
Gallons Purged: -0.0. (mg/L): ~ t--..
I ORP (mv): . -.:, -I---_
Temperalure (DC): r---.._
pH: r.....
I Specffic Conductivily(s): ---...
other. ,
Odor. SULFUR I PINETAR / NAPL Obseived: TAR I FOAM I
I End Well Ev~cu:.lion (lime): Ttme/O~te:
Total Volume Purged (gal): T me/Oale Restart
SAMPLE COLLECTION INFORMATION
I Sample ID: ....... • ..-\ Spilt Sample: YES/NO
Sample Time/Dale: \ ~tl """ Cl"' \.,,\-c-
DupUcale: YES/l(CJ\ , Org;mi:z;rtion:
I Field Blank: YES/IIO
Par'alneters: \/0 C.5,. Parametars: SAME I OTHER
I COMMENTS
I
I
I
I Z:0 :391/d SclM 1LESl>Z:91>01> 9E:z:, S00Z:/Z:0/S0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WESTONW.O. NO. ______ _ Date
WELL EVACUATION/SAMPLING FORM
GENERAL INFORMATION
Well No.: ~"->-" We.ither.. ·'5.,.,..,,-.W\.lf\._ "iO '.S.
Sampling Team: c _ • lcac-CJ"' -•• Samµle(s Signature: ,,_. '1 . . -~
' • WELL ME.ASUREMENTS
Proledive Caso,g: lrtlaci I Damaged Comments:
l.Od<ed: ~ I NO
Concrete Base: lrj!Sq I Damaged
Casing Diameter: 2il!'., Jin.,....., 61n., Bin. Stickup Height
WELL EVACUATION INFORMATION
A. T 0131 Depth (Top of Casing ~ TOC): Well Evacuanon MetnO<l (baller, submersible pump)
B. Deptfl to Watsr (DTW) (TOC): ~ .r fti\ ' .
C. Column of Standing Water (C---A-B): Begin WeU Evacuation [nme): .
'\' •'• .. ,D. Purge Factor. Evacuation Rate (gpm):
(2in.:0.16, 3ln.:0.37. 4in.:0.65, 6i1l.:1.47, 8_in.:2.61)
Drawdown Observed (ft): "\
E. One Well Volume (gal/LF) (E=Cld)): Stop ~vacua1ion (Tlflle/Reason): \.
F. # Volum8S to be Purged (3): Restart Time: '\
G. 'f o!al Gallons to be E'.vacuated (G•FxE): W•II Pumped Dry YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS
Time: -
Gallons Purged:
------D.O. (mg/I.): r----..__
ORP (mv):
------Temperature (DC): ------pH:
------Specific Conduclivity(s ):
-----Other: --.......
Odor. SUL.FUR I PINE TAR I NAPL Observed: TAR I FOAM I
End Well Evacuation (Time): 111TlefDate:
Total Volume Purgoo (gal): TI/Tle/Dato Restart
SAMPLE COLLECTION INFORMATION
Sample ID: 1'1-14-~ Spl~ Sample: YESl!IO J
Sample T .ne/Date: ...., I .._ 1 I" c -iq I'--
Duplicate: YE~ ----, Otganization:
F.,ld Blank: YE
Parameters: '11)(.,S Parameters: SAME I OTHER
COMMENTS
E0 39\/d 1LESP<'.9t>0t,
. ·--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WESTON W.O. NO. ______ _
WE1.L EVACUATION/SAMPLING FORM
GENERAL INFORMATION
WeR No.: ''"'•, -4 Weather: 1.1.0 ,.,_ .cJ~ .I
Sampling Team: ~ \ce-ir.. \ v -• 11 a. Sampler's Signature: . ".$,,~•/
WELL MEASUREMENTS .
Protectlve Casing: lnt)lg I Damage<l Comments:
Locked; ~ I NO
Concrete Base: I~ I gamagoo
Casing Diameter. 2in., 3in., l4'~-. 6in., Bin, Stid<up Height
WELL EVACUATION INFORMATION
A Total Depth (Top of Casing= TOC): WeU Evacuation Method (baiter, sUbmerst:ile pump)
B. Deplh to Wat,,,-(OlW) (TOC): "!, i, ;1,0
C. Column of Standing Waler (C>-A-8): Begin WeR Evacuation (Trne):
0. Purge Factor: ', ..
(2in.:0,16, Jin.:0.37. 4in.:0.65, 6i11.:1.47, 8_in.:2.61)
Evacuation Rate (gpm):
Orawdown Obserwd (ft):
E. Ona Well Volume (gal/1.F) (E=CxO): Stop Evacuation (T1JT1e/Reason):
F. # Volumes 10 be Purged (3): Restart Time:
G. Total GallaM to be Evacuoted (G=~xE): Well Pumped Ory: YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS
Time: . ..._
Gallons Purged: -c..
0.0. {mg/I.):
ORP(mv): •. -----Temperature (DC): ---.
pH: ~
Specific Conduciiviry(s):
other.
Odoc SULFUR I PINE TAR/ NAPl Observed: TAR I FOAM I
End Well Evacuation (Time); Time/Date:
Total Volume Purged (gal): T me/Oare Restart
SAMPLE COLLECTION INl'ORMA TION
Sample ID: mw-L-\ Split Sample: YESJ(«'\
Sample Time/Date: \'1.-"1.S -L .. \..,~ • Duplicate: YES/111:D . Organization:
Field Blank: YES/llO\
Parameters: Pan,melers: SAME I 011-iER \foC..~
COMMlaNTS
P0 391/d 1LE9P09P0P 9E:01 9000/00/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Wl=STONW.O. NO. ______ _ Date O"t-\.6-tJ P':,
Wl::LL ~ACUATION/SAMPUNG FORM
GENERAL INFORMATION
Well No.: 'N'\W .C:::: Weathet:
Sampling Team: Sample(s Signature:
WELL MEASUREMENTS
Protective Casing: lntae! I Damaged Comments:
Locked; YES I NO
Concrete Base: Intact I Damaged
Casing Diameter: 2i:i., Jin., 4in.. 6in., Bin. Stickup Height
WELL EVACUATION INFORMATION
A Total Depth (Top ofC..sing ~ TOG): WeU Evacuatton MetllO(I (baiter, submersible pump)
B. Depth to Water (DlW) (TOC):
C. Column of Slamling Water (C:A-B): Begin Wen Evacua!lon (Tome): --··· -D. Purge Factor:. Evacuation Rate (gpm):
(2m.:0.16, 3in.:0.37, <$;n.:0.65, 6in.:1.47, 8_in.:2.61)
. Dra,,.Jown Observed (R):
E. One Well Volume (gaVLF) (E=Cx!J): Stop Evacuation (flme/Reasan):
F. ·#Volumes to be Purged (3): Restan Time:
C. Total Gallons to be Evacuated (G=Fxf.): We" Pumped Ory: YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS
Time: \'1.llt \"\.).1 \'i,t.R l 4.'Z}\
Gallons Purged:
0.0. (mg/L): .... ,~ !..'68 t. ,'-\l \,.\{I.I
ORP (mv): \q'(,8 -zdl 't-1.1 ., 1.,1..0
Temperature (DC): ,c: t.C\ l t. :~-z. \I._.,,~ 11 •• 1 0
pH: I. I II. ~.,"1 is.ti. '5.1 •,\
Specific ConductMty(s): \1\5 \t\• l'\O l~ t
other. \U• ..a·. -1: ... I ~ 0" 0 '°' o. ?,'( B/IC
Odor. SULFUR / PIN<: TAR / NAPl Obsen,ed: TAR I FOAM I
End WeH Ev1;1cuation (rane): Time/Date:
Total Volume Purged (gal): Thie/Date Restan:
SAMP.LE COLLECTION INFORMATION
Sample ID: ~"',":, $pl~ Sample: YES/NO
Sample Time/Date: .... , __ , ..... 11{~0
Duplicate: YE~J I Organizstlan:
Field Blank: YESJtt9
Parameters: Paramelers: SAME I OTHER
COMMENTS
S0 3911d 1LES1'1:9t,0t,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WESTON W.O. NO. ______ _ 0ate oz..1 at--16 s
WELL EVACUATION/SAMPLING FORM
GENERAL INFORMATION
Wen No.: ""w ,.; ~ e::,.... Weather. :io 'IS . O.a IIAC.,._. -r
Sampling Team: :S oi\"4 5 • -0 . Sampler's Signature:
u WELL MEASUREMENTS
Protoctive Ca$ing: lntad I Damaged Comments:
Lodu,t YES I NO .· ..
Concrete Base: lnlad I Damaged
Casing Diameter. 2in .. 3in., 4in., 6in .. Sin. Slld(up Height ·•
WELL EVACUATION INFORMATION
A. Total Depth (Top olC<osing = TOC): WeD Evacuation Method (bailer. submeri;ible pomp)
B. Depth to Water (OTW) (TOC):
C. Column of Standing Water (C=A.S): Begin WeU Evacuation (Tm,):
0. Purge Factor: Evacualion Rate (gpm):
(2in.:0.16. Jin.:0.37. 4in.:0.65. 6in.:1.47, Sin.:2.61)
Drav.oown Obse<ved (fl):
E. One Well Volume {gal/LF) (E=CxD}: Stop Evacuation {Trne!Roa:son):
F. # Volumes to be Purged (3): Restart T vr1e:
G. Total GaUons to be Evacuated (G=FxE): Well l'tJmped Oty: YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS
Time: \!")"!,«-. 1a--.:fo \"'"{I \,-1.(1, I I ""{'2, \0 I.II,(
Gallons Purged:
0.0. (mg)L): s.1c, ">,. ~I, ~.'~1 \.,.~(. S.Q. I l,.~'{
ORP (mv): l,l-1.. i:z& 1~1(·' t11 l'lU ,_,u
Temperature (DC): 1,.1,u \'l.-~t 1'1,:-(;0 t1 ,Mil \'\.0., ,~.10
pH: I,.\ "1 '-;"I :.1 $,'\"'I. ~.1'\ "$.,"!> '5. ",'{
Specific Conducti-lity(s): N"I , .. \'-1& \\Cl 1'<7 \'{ l
Other. ~ • -l • ,l • .L.,,. 0.1,1 o. C, .. e,9-1. --O,'tS
Odoc SULFUR / PINE lYIR I NAPL Obse!Ved: TAR I FOAM I
End Well Evacuation (r,me): Tlme/Da~:
Total Volume Purged (gal): Time/Date Restlrt:
SAMP\..E COLLECnoN INFORMATION
Sample 10: tl\W-"¼ Split Semple: YES/NO
Sample Tune/Da~ , ... ,.'5 rii"LI ·• I -• 0
Oupl<:ate: YE~ Organizalion:
Field Blank: YE •
Parameters: Parameters: SAME
\/oC.,S
I OTHER
COMMENTS
.
90 39\/d 1LESl>C:91>01>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WESTONW.O. NO. ______ _ Date fild.oJo:5
WEU EVACUATION/SAMPLING FORM
GENERAL INFORMA TIDN
Well No.: l'I\W-~ Weather.
S.,mpling Team: .::;.., II.es _n Sample(s Signature:
....-WELL MEASUREMENTS
Protective casing: Intact I Damaged Comments'.
Locked: YES I NO
Concrete Base: Intact I Damaged .
Casing Oiamet:er: 2in., Jin., 4/n., Gin., 8iri. St;c:J<up Height: ..
WELL EVACUATION INFORMATION
A Total Depth (fop of Casing= TOC): Wen Evacuation Method (bailer, submersible pump)
B. Depth to Wate< (DlW) (TOC):
C. Column or Standing Water (C=A-B): Begin Wen Evacuation (Tme):
D. Pul1J<l Factor: Evacuation Rau, (9pm):
(2in.:0.16. Jin.:0.37. 4in.:0.65, Gin.:1.47, 8_in.:2.61)
Or.M<Jown Obs8fV8d (ft):
E. One. Well Volume (gal/LF) (E•CxO): Stop Evacuation (Time/Reason):
F. # Volumes to be Purged (3): Restart lime:
G. Total Galklns to be Evacuated (G=FxE): Well Pumped O,y: YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS
Time: \'U)O \1,0\ \1,.62, run 11.v'f
Ganons Purged:
0.0. (mg/L): 1-~S 1-'&~ ,.~\ 1.u" 1-,_ ....
ORP(mv): \\~ lO I L-i~ \-:l-5 l~,
Temperature (DC): t2-la I ~ .'1.1 ,~ q1 11. \\~ l'5.'-l.g
pH: 6.C\1 L..0~ 1.· "'I i..oi 1.,0~
Specific Conductivity(s): L01. \\S I" I ,-. I lO I
Othec ~1ul..\•·~-t1.,mi'\ l.'5~ o. ?_'{ .. 1'2. "· 1 '1 ~
Odoc SULFUR I PINE TAR / NAPL Observed: TAR I FOAM I
End WBII ~vacuation (Time): Tirne/Oate;
Total Volume Purged (gal): lime/Date Restart
SAMPLE COLLECTION INFORMATION
SarnplelD: l'-'\IJ -P. Splo Sample: YES/NO
Sample Time/Date: 1'2..l'l!5 . 01-loLl "'"'
Ouplate: YES/r\11 • Organization:
Field Blank: YES/l icr
Parameters: \Jbl.s Parameters: SAME I OTHER
COMMENTS
-
LB 391/d SclM IL£SN'.9P0P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WESTON W.o. NO. ______ _ Date
WELL EVACUATION/SAMPLING FORM
GENERAL INFORMATION
Wen No.: W\'•, • ., Weather.
Sampling Team: ~n I, ..... -o ... A. Sampler's Signature: -WELL MEASUREMENTS
Protective Casing: Intact I Damaged Comments:
Locked: YES I NO
Concrete Base: Intact I Damaged
Casing Diameter: 2in.. Jin., 4in., 6in., Sin, Stickup Height
WELL EVACUATION INFORMATION
A. TOia! Depth (Tap of Casing= TOG): Well Evacuation Method (bailer, submemibte pump)
B. 0.pth ta Wate< (DlWJ (TOC):
C. Column of Standing Wa1"< (G-'A-B): Begin WeR Evacuation (Time):
D. Purge Fact<,r. Evacuation Raia (gpm):
{2in.:0.16, 3in.:0.37, 4in.:0.65, 6in.:1.47, 8_in.261)
Dta\\oown Obsetved (It):
E. One Weil Volume (gaVLF) (E=Odl): Stop l=vacuation (fime/Reason):
f. ;, Volum~ to be Purged (3): Restart Time;
G. l'olal Gclllon$ to be Evacuated (G:::FxE): Well Pumped Dry: YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS
lime: \0\\1 '" l<i \ll'l.D \OU. 16 'I. 'f \I)'!,$°
GaRons Purged:
D.0. (mg/L): I. ."I'"{ l,. 1\11. l,. 'i :, t..i I " . ., , 1,,'\L\
ORP (mv): I 'il',I. 3 \<\I, I'll .11~: ,,.i_ l'l...C A.
Temperature (DC); 1-t ~'l ,._ 'lla 13. ~5 I'{ .'5¥, l'l.5~ \~.• 1.
pH: '5,1\ I ~."l"t ';j, KU s.~i.. s ·", C.' 0 Specific Conductivlty(:J): liO 11'5 11 '-I ,1s ,,s \1o,
Other. 7 11..(\.: A., -le , { W',l( '. '\'f .'1~ --~ -l?.S'..:i
Odor. SULFUR / P!Ne-< AA / NAPL Observed: TAR I FOAM I
End Well Evacuation (fime): TlfTle/D~te:
T.otal Volume Purged (gal): Time/Date Resia,t:
SAMPLE COLLEGTION INFORMATION
Sample ID: tf>w-"\ Sp!a Sample: YES/NO
sa·mple Tim~uate: o~ •-•111.:. ... "7 ..:;
0upflcafe: \YE~O Organization:
Field Blank: YE,~
Parameters: \IOL~ Parameter..: SAME. I OTHER
COMMENTS
~--
80 381/d Sc!M TLESl>1:91>0t> 9E:1:1 S001:/1:0/S0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WESTON W.0. NO. ______ _
WELL EVACUATION/SAMPLING FORM
G!aNERAL INFORMATION
Well No.: """'-' -l U Weather: io·s • ~n-•~"t'
Sampling Team: ~~~~, 0 ..... • A Sample(s Signature: . y WELL MEASUREMENTS
Protective Casing: Intact I Damaged Comments:
Lod<ed: YES I NO
Concrete Base: Intact I Damaged
Casing Diameter: 2in .• 3in .. 4in., 6in., Sin. Stickup Height:
WELL EVACUATION INFORMATION .
A. Total Depth (Top ofGaslng = TOC): Well Evacuation Method (bailer, sUbmersible pump)
B. Depth lo Wale< (DTW) (TOC):
C. Column of Stand;ng Water (C=A·B): Begin Well E.acualion (Tome):
D. Purge Factor. Evacuation Rate (gpm): (21n.:0.16. 3in.:0.37, din.:0.65, ~in.:1.47, B_jn.:2.61)
Drawdown Obseived (ft):
E. One Well Volume (.gal/LF) (E=C)([)): Stop Evacuation (TimefR0ilson):
F. # Volumes lo be Purged (3): Restart Time:
G. Total Gallons lo be Evacuated (G".'fxE)·. Well Pumpod Dry: YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS
Time: I'( O"{ \'IDS \'1,0\, \'-\ti1 \'-lt)A
GaDons Purged:
D.O. (mg/L): \t'o"> c;-.c;y s.'112. 1&:•(1.. l •• \l
ORP(mv): ,1\. t \1t.-.'f \1$.\1,' \1~-S \"\~.,
Temperature (DC): \ ~-'Ol, ..... ,1. It. \C: \le-\\ \I..\O
pH: I, .-s "\ (._ 'i l1 , •. '311 I, .-:ti. 1..1'!1
Specific_ ConduC1ivity!s):. l10 .'.J-5 \11-nz. \1?. \11
other. -.1.S rr. l'\ o.,'3 I\ _",(" !, 0:1,a
Odor. SULFUR / PINE TAR / NAPL Observed: TAR I FOAM I
Encl Well EvacuaUoo (Time): Time/Oate:
Total Volume Purged (gal): Time/Date Restart:
SAMPLE COLI.ECTION INFORMATION
Sampia ID: l"f\W-\0 Spl~ Sample: YES/NO
Sample lime/Date: cn.lc,..l~ , \'1 [()
Duplicate: YESIN Organiution:
Field Blank: YES 9
Parameters: \fDL s Parameters: SAME I OTHER
COMMENTS
."(" .. , ... n-.... o.,p •l"'c,.'IU .,,, .. ~\ • IJ
• · 0---"11.h, .. < n-• -• •.JI. fl...L •'!I• \ I • I ""-()Jl. LL ~"'--'-· ' \ • .
. -~ .
60 391/d Sc!M
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WESTON W.O. NO. ______ _ Date Ql-lo'(, I os
WELL EVACUATION/SAMPLING FORM
GENERAL INFORMATION
wen No.: tAW-\\ Weather. ?.n. • ~ _ C,u,.,._1=
SamplingTeam: .,_ .. <..-:1,--Sample(s Signature:
WELL MEASUREMENTS
Prot..ctive Casing: Intact I Dam"!JOO Comments:
Locl<ed: YES I NO____..-
Concrete Base: Intact _t..--CTamaged
Casing Diameter: si'(. 3111., 4in., Gin., Bin. Stici<up Height
WELL EVACUATION INFORMATION
A. Total Depth (Top of Casing = TOC): I WeR Evacuation Method (bailer, :submersible pump)
B. Deplh to W•lcr (OlW) (TOC): /
C. Column of standing Water (C=A-B): / Begin Well Evacuation (rme):
0. Purge Factor. · · · ·; r Evacuation Raia (gpm):
(2ln.:0.16, 3in.:0.37, 4in.:0.65, 6in.:U , 8_in.2.61)
Drawdov.n Observed (ft):
E. One Well Volume (gal/LF) (E~c.O): . Stop Evacuation (Time/Reason):
F. # Volumes to be Purged (3): Restart Time:
G. Toi<>! Gallons to be Evacuale<l (G=FxE): Well Pumped O,y: YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS .... :i:"
Tme: n9iSO 0'6~2.. o~t&it oQC:1. l)IVO ~
Gallons Purged: --~ _. -
D.O. (rng/L): 1 .I\~ 1.tt, 1.1'\ ., ·"-c:; 1.'\'1'
ORP(mv): \'l'i: ~ \qLI ."\ \t\\;~-, . ...._.., f ,.,,.
Temperature (OC): \-..1,1~ 11-~0 11.1'11. 11.1.!S 11 .\"3
pH: C .11 lo,.\~ t..o \ ~ ~1.. 5.&o
Specific Conductiviry(s): '.ls I, I '2,} t\'\ II '( 111
Other.\··_\.., 1: .I..... ,::'.,..~ fl -l1 h I")._ ,.o'\ ~
Odor. SULFUR / PINel'AR / NAPL Obsoived: TAR I FOAM I
End Well C:vacuation (Time): 'frne/Oate:
Tolal Volume Purged (gal): Time/Date Reslall:
SAMPLE COLLECTION INFORMATION
Sample ID: IV\W•\I Sp[JI Sample: YES/NO
Sample Time/Dale: .,-, -, . -
"" ",Q -O\Jplicate: YES!ffq Organization:
Field Blank: YES/Nil
Parameters: \fOL1
Paramete<S: SAME I OTHER
COMMENTS
.
01 391/d SclM lLESt>l:91>01>
I
I WESTON W.O. NO. ______ _
WELL EVACUATION/SAMPLING FOl>M
I GENERAL INFORMATION
WeU No.: N\h \ -\'2.. Weather. \> A.11.-(_ \ -J. '-lt\ ·~
I SamplingTeam: <,...;~-,_ '->-Sampie(s Signature: I/ V . .
~ weu ME.ASUREMENTS
Protectiw Casing: 1rp_Jt I Damageo • Comments:
I
Locked: YES I ~ c:;.1,,., J_ ~\<.e~
Coricrere Base: ln!QI:' I Oa~
Casing Diameter: Zin,, 3in., 4in., (Gin.~ .&n. Sticl<up Height
WELL EVACUATION INFORMATION
I A Total Oep111 (Top of Casing = TOC): Wen Evacuation Method {bailer, :svbmef'3ble pump)
B. Depth lo Wat.or (OlW) (TOC): \'°(. (),.--C. Column of standing Waler {C=A-8): Begin Well Evacuation (Trne):
I o. Purge Factoc Evacuation Rate (gpm):
(2in.:0.16 . .'.3in.:0.37, 4in.:0.65, Bin.:1.47. 8_in.:2.61)
Drawd0"'1 Obse,ved (ft):
I E. One Well Volume (gal/LF) (E=CxO): Stop Evacuation (rime/Reason):
F. # Volumes co t>e Purged (3): Restart 'Time:
G. Total Gellono to be Evacuated (G=FxE): Well Pumped Ory: YES I NO
I INDICATOR PARAMETERS
T1me: ............
Gallons Purged: -----I
D.O. (mg/L): ..........__
ORP(mv): ..........__ .. .,
Temperature (OC): ----pH: r--
I Speclt1c Conductivily{s): -----Otller. t-.
Odor. SULFUR / PINE TAR/ NAPL Observed: TAR I FOAM I
I End Wen Evacuation ('Tiriie); T1me/O:ite:
Total Volume Pur9act {gaij: Time/Date Restart
I SAMPLE COLLECTION INFORMATION
Sample ID: ""', •, -\'Z... Splil Sample: YES/NO
Sample Tlme/Date: ,t,,1 -.. in.\o,1,.,,c-
I Duplic;atc: YEStWJ . Organization:
Field Blank: YES/119
I
Parameters:
\JQ(..S,
·Parameters: SAME I OTHER
COMMENTS
I
I
I
I 11 39\/d
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WESTONW.O. NO. ______ _
WELL EV ACIJA TION/SAMPLING FORM
GENERAL INFORMATION
Well No.: 't<'-w~\Y Weather: s ............ . . . '40 'S.
Sampling Team: s.~;vJ'<..
.., __
•• Sampler's Signatum: -.. V ~' . . V WELL MEASUREMENTS '-
Protective eas;ng: lnfacl I Damaged Comments:
Loeke<:l: YI'~ I NO
Concrete Base: lnlii\:t I Damaged
casing Diameter: 2in., 3in,, 4in,, Gin., Bin. SUcki4, Height
WELL EVACUATION INFORMATION
A Total Depth (Top of Casing= TOC): -Well Evacuation Method (ballar, submersible pump)
B. Dep1h to Wat,,r (DlW) (TOG): LI \a.\\ •
C. Column of standing Water (C=A-8): Beglo WeU Evacuation (Hrne):
n-· P~r-ge Fa,;.tor. Evaaiation Rate (gpm):
(2in.:0.16, 3ln.:0.37, 4in.:0.65, Bin.:1.47, 8in,:2.61}
Dr..wdown Observed (fl):
E. One Well Volum,, (gal/LF) (E=C.O): Stop Evacuation (Tune/Reason):
F. # Volumes to be Putged (3): Restart Tome:
G. Total Gallons to bo Evacua<ed (G=FxE): Wi;,11 Pumped Ory: YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS
Time:
Gallons Purged: ......___
D.O. (mg/L):
---------ORP(mv): ........ ..
Temperature (DC): ~ ..__
pH: -,___
Specific Conductivlfy(s): .....___
other:: ~1-----
Odoc SULFUR I PINE TAR/ NAPL Observed: TAR I FOAIIJI' I
End Wt:in Evacuation (Time): Time/Oare:
Total Volume Purged (gal): Trne/Date Reslart
SAMPLE COLU:CTION INFORMATION
Sample 10: \"M•J -\'4 Split Sample: YES/NO
Sample Time/Date: \SOC). cue,\"-<.
Duplicate: YES!f'«ll Organization:
Field Blank: YE~
Paramete~: Parameters: SAME I OTHER
COMMENTS
GI 381/d SclM TLES1>1'.91>01>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WI:STON W.O. NO. ______ _
WELL EVACUATION/SAMPLING FORM
GENERAL INFORMATION
Well No.: tt\lJ.l-\..,,. Weather.
Sampling T earn: "::>\),~~•\]it:>•·· A Sampler's Signature.:
WELL MEASUREMENTS
Protective Casing: Intact I Damaged Comments:
Locked: YES I NO
Concrete Base.: Intact I . Damaged
Casing Diameter. 2in., 3in., 4in., Gin., Bin. Stickup Height
WELL EVACUATION INFORMATION
A. Total Depth (Top of Casing= TOCt. wen "EVacuc!tlOn Method (bailer, sUbmerslbte pump)
B. Depth to wata, (OlW) (TOC): '-\ -1 l, . -C. Column of Standing Wate, (C=A-B): Begin WeU Evacuation (T<ne): f---••-' "'
Evacuation Rate (gpm): O. P'-'•::r:-factor ·
(2in,:0,16, 3in.:0.37, 4in.:0.65, 6in.:1.47, a_;n.:2.61)
Dramown Observed (ft):
E. One Well Volume (gal/l.F) (E=CxO): Stop Evacuation (Time/Reason):
F. H Volumes to be Purged (3)'. Restart Time:
G, Total Galleno to be Evacuated (G=:FxE): Well Pumped Ory. YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS
Tme: -Gallons Purge~:
------D.0. (mg/I..):
------ORP(mv): ' " ------' ' Temperature (DC):
------pH: 'f-.._
Specific CooductMty(s): --Other: ~
Odoc SULFUR ' PINE TAR I NAPL Observe<!: TAR I FOAM I
End Well Evacuation (Time): Time/Date:
Total Volume Purged (gal): lime/Date Restart:
SAMPLE COLLECTION INFORMATION
Sample 10: M\o,. \'5 Spr.1 Sample: YES/NO
sample lirne/Oate: \'f).'i . ti ,._ I ti\ \ D..S.
lltiplicale: YE:s/f'IU_ Organcuruon:
Field Blank: YE""l!O J
P·arameters: Parameters: SAME I OTHER '10 <...s
COMMENTS
E, 39\/d S~M 1LES1>Z:91>01>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WESTON W.O. NO. ------'----Date O'Ll c, HOY
WELL EVACUATION/SAMPLING FORNI
GENERAL INFORMATION
WeO No.: fVl.u.} A \.Q Weather. '
Samplil1g Team: ~ ~ ·.-~ ...... ~ SampJef's Signature:
~ WELL MEASUREMENTS
Protective Casing: Intact I Damaged Comments:
Lt>d<ed: YES I NO
' Conctt!!lte Base: Intact I Damaged
Casing Diameter. 2in .• 3in., 4ITT., Sin .. Sm. Slid<up Height
WELL EVACUATION INFORMATION
A. Total Depth (Top of Casiflg = TDC): WeD Evacuation Method (baller, submersible pump)
B. Depth to Water (OlW) (TOC):
c. Column of Standing Water (C=A-8): Begin Well Evacuation (Time):
D. Purge Factor: Evacuation Rate (gpm):
(2jn.:0.16. 3in.:o:37, 4in.:0.65. 6in.;1.47, 8_in.:2.61)
Drawdown Obse1ved (11):
E. One. Well Volume (gaVLF) (E=CxD): Stop Evacuation (Time/Reason);
F. 'it Volumes ro be Purged (3): Restart Time:
G. Total Gallons to be Evacuated (G=FJ<E): Well Pumped Dry: YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS
Tune: \\i.S ll ~I, \~1 11-.. R lf.i'I
GallOfls Putged:
0.0. (mgll): s.<l.e> 4. l I '!,.15 ~.,s \(.','1
ORP (mv): 11..;7 s a,·\ 'i~."t c:; l, ''3,
Temperature (QC); \.::: .o"3 l'S-l~ 1< ·"'' \'5.Ll3 l'!i. l(O
pH: S. "I. I '5. 1iHo $.85 s.~c; is. '{5
Specific Conductivity(s): \'2.-\ 1a.~ l ':1 ;}_ l:I; ll3
otller. \ \I.I \;,, il.I ~ r;i... "\ '\)."{ ,..:.. t'1n 1\5
Odor. SULFUR I PIN!::'TAR I NAP!. ObseMld: TAR I FOAM I
End Well ~vacualion (rme}: TJme/llate:
Total Volume Pursed (gal): T,me/Dale Restart:
SAMPLE COLLECTION INFORMATION
Sample ID: q\\i, _., '. Spl~ Sample: YESJNO
Sample Time/Date: 11-i..lo2-lr><:. . 114.0
Duplicate: YES/1\_0) Organizalion:
Field Blank: YE~
Parameters: './ 0 l-S Pa,ameters: SAME I OTHER
COMMENTS
1'1 3:l\/d Sc!M 1LES1'i:91'0t,
..
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WESTON W.O. NO. ______ _ Date (Y1-\oyo5
WELL EVACUATION/SAMPLING FORM
GENERAL INFORMA TJON
Well No.: t'l\v...,-\7 Weather. A"-••,.,<•' X<J>·• SamplingTeam.: -::,.;;~ ::> -·-Sampler's Signature: I
Wl:U. MEASUREMENTS
Protective Casing: intact I Damaged Comments:
Locked: YES I NO
Concrete Base: Intact I Damaged
Casing Diameter: 2in., 3in., 4in., 6in_, Sin. S~ckup Height:
WELL EVACUATION INFORMATION
A. Total Depth (Top of Casing~ TOC): WeR Evacuation M'ettlOO {bailer, submersible pump) B. Dep<h 10 Woha, (DlW) (fOC):
C. Column of Standing Water (Cu:A..S): Begin Well Evacuation (llme): D. Purge Factor.
(2in.:0,16, Jin.:0.37. 4in.:0.65, Sin.:1.◄7, S_in.:2.61)
• Evacuation Rate {gpm):
Orawdown ObseNed (fl): E. One Well Volume (gal/LF) (EaCxO): Stop Evac;uatJon (Time/Rea:son); F. # Volumes to be Purged (3): Restart Time:
G. Total Galk)ns to be Evacuated (G=FxE): Well Pumped Dry: YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS
Tane: 0'-l'ft-ot1G. oitso Gallons Purged:
D.O. (mg/L): ~ '>4 ,. (.,'t' ~.71 ORP(mv): 14-1 is'fJ Ir..-..
Temperature (DC): C 'l (. (,,• ~ { "-~'• pH: io~ S,oY t:;.tr. Specific Conduc:tivity(s): 10(. '0"5 JOC. O!her. 7..._,...t...,•J \J ~ 1,.G,S 0. O""-Odor. SULFUR / PINE TRK / NAPL Observed: TAR I FOAM I
End Wet! Evacuation (Time): rrneJDate: Total Volume Purged (gal): Tune/Date Restart:
SAMPLE COLLECTION INFORMATION Sample_lD:
Spfit Sample: YES/NO Sampte TITTle/Date: 0 '\ 'S S • o"L-l e-tl Q c::: Duplicate: YES•'-!', ) Organization:
Field Blank: YE,;,~ ~
Parameters: Parameters: SAM~ I OTHER
COMMENTS
Yu.,~ UOT ,.,or'-'·-L. + .JI.-· :, ~A. -~ .I... I,.,,: I).' •• //.'.L!J. • ...-;-a~/c}..._..,, u I I • • . .
S1 38\/d Sc!M
--
......,,,. .. _,, .
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WESTONW.O. NO. ______ _ Dale OUO'Uo5
WELL EVACUATION/SAMPLING FORM
GENERAL INFORMATION
Well No.: mw -t9. Weather. D, ·-_ -.L . -"ln I c
Sampling Team: .~;lb., I U'-Samplel's Signature: . . WEU MEASUREMENTS
Proledive Casing: Intact I Damaged Comments:
LOcked: YES I NO
Corioete Base: Intact I Damagod
casing Diameter. 2ln .• 3in., 4in., Gin., Bin. Stickup Height
WELL EVACU.AllON INFORMATION
A. Total Depth (Top or Casing = TOG): WeD Evacuation Method (ba~er, submersible pump)
B. Depth to Wa,,,,. (OTW} (TOC):
C. Col\Jmn of Standing Water (C><A-B): Begin Well Evacuation (Tane): -· -··
D. Purge Factor. Evacuation Rate (gpm):
(2in.:0.16, 3In.:0.37, 4in.:0.65, 6in.:1.47, Bin.:2.61)
. Dmwown Observed (ft):
E. One Wen Volume (gal/LF) (EeCxD): Stop Evacuation (Time/Reason);
F. # Volumes lo be Purged (3): Restait lime:
G. 'J'otal Gallon$ to .be Evacuated (G=F'xE): Well Pumped Ory; YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS
TQ'Tle:
Gallons Purged:
0.0. (mg/L): ~ .t. "\ 4 .'\~) 't-10 ~.\l l'\.O~
ORP(mv): it,, 'l '\'i, '> '('\.'{' Y\.C l'I.. X
Temperature (DC): fi.1_\ 1.1 ·:, "l• ':> S ,. ':, 1.,,
pH: \a. 01.f 'l.' I s .1, ~., ... ~.1,
Specific ConduCliviry(s): l '-'~ l "\ 1'1 l t "l I I'\. I
other.-\""' 't). ')\oOO )lflO() ~\()II\! 'Jinn )\,ob
Odor. SULFUR / PINE TAR / NAPL Observed: TAR I FOAM I
End Well E~cuation (irmo)~ l"me/Date:
Total Volume Purged (gan: Time/Date Resta~;
SAMPLE COLLECTION INFORMATION
Sample ID; \'t\W ,l!!i Split Sample: YES/NO
Sample Time/Date: -I o• l,,c:, 0'\15
Duplic<lte: YES/~. , Organ~tion:
F"ield Blank: YES/1'1<.J
Parameters: Parameter.;: SAME I OTHER
VOl-S
COMMENTS
91 3911d S?JM 1LESPZ:9P0P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WESTON W.O. NO. ______ _ Date 11't{o-z,los
WELL EVACUATION/SAMPLING FORM
GENERAL INFORMATION
Well No.: 'C'I\W . \"I. Weather: ':>Q'S . o ... _c:.._~
5amplillg Team: <:..,a ~s . ~ o \.\ el\. Sample(s Signature:
WELL MEASUREMENTS
Protective Casing: Intact I O,niaged Comments:
L.ocked: YES I NO -··,
Conc:rere Base: Intact I Damaged
Casing Diameter. 2in .• 3in .• 4in., 6in., Bin. Slic:kup Height ..
WELL EVACUATION INFORMATION
A. T 01a1 Deplh (Top of Casing = TOC): Well Evacuation Method (bailer, submersille pump)
B. Depth lo Water (OTW) (TOC):
C. Column of Standing Waler (C=A~): Begin Well Evacuation (Tme):
D. Purge Factor. Evawauon Rate (gpm):
(2in.:0.16. 3in.:0.37, 4in.:0.65. 6in.:1.47. S_in.:2.61)
Drawdown Observed (ft):
E. One Well Volutne (gaV'LF) (E=CxO): Stop Evacuation (T"lfTIOIReason):
F. # Volumes to be Pu'l)ed (3): Restart Tme:
G. Tolal Ganons lo be Evacuated (G=FxE): Wei f'.umped D<y: YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS
Time:
Gallons Purged:
0.0. (mg,\.): l,,'itt I, .'U) !i.l,I. l,.~c; , •• ~•1
ORP(mv): u~ us 1...11o:· -us 1,.\4
Temperature (DC): \'I .' 0 l<t. '11 \"\."r, 1~ .. '\'\ \"\.0
pH: <;;. Cl " ,:; '1M s ·"'' {AS S."-'1
Specific Conductivily(s): ,is l'!i1 l'\1 \~ <{ \)9
Other.
'-~-J.•-1-.. 0 .it'f " 'l I !I .I ..... -n., . l
Odor. SULFUR / PINE=/ NAPL Observed: TAR I FOAM I
End Well ~vacuation (iu-ne): T,mell)ate:
Total Volume Purged (gal): Time/Date Restart: .. SAMPLE COLLECTION INFORMATION
Sample 10: tr,. \I) A'\ · Split Sample: YES/NO
Sample !me/Date: · 1:.'i.\a'L.\I)~ . l\ \l)
Duplicate: YESM,\ • Organization:
Field Blank: YE5.t1O)"
Parameters: '10Cs
Porameters: SAME I OTHER
COMMENTS
.
l1 381/d S?:IM 1l£Sl>1:9t,0t,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WESTON W.O. NO. ______ _ Date 91,,l_e,1 lo6
WELL EVACUATION/SAMPLING FORM
GENERAL INFORMATION
Well No,: "", • , -'2.0 wealher: 11"'-'S, 0\1 u' ........X-
Sampling Tt:::!am: 5....-,~~ .. 0 --Sample(s Signature: 'Ii'-I --. . . WELL MEASUREMENTS -.J
Protedwe Casing: 1"91ct I Damaged comments:
Locked: Yi."I I NO
Concrete Base: l'\!3_9 I Damaged
Casing Diameter: 2in., 3in., ,f'J]. Gln., Bin. Stickup Height
WEU EVACUAmN INFORMATION
A. Total Depth (Top of Casing = TOC): Well Evacuation Method (bailer. subme~ible pt.imp)
8. Depth ro Water (OlWJ (TOC): l-'-t ·"'H --C. Column of Sran<fmg wai,,, (C=A-B): Begin Well Esacuation (Time): ··----· ·---~·· o. Purge Factor.· ,!,,·, ... Evacuation Rate (gpm):
{2io.:0.16. Jin.:0.37, 1in.:0.6S, 6ITT.:1.47, S_in.:2.61)
Drawdown Obsefved (ft):
E. One Well Volume (gal/1.F) (E=CxO): Stop Evacuation (TlmeiRBason ):
F. /I Volumes lo be Purged (3): Restart Time:
G. Total Galiano to be E"'1CU3led (G=FxE): Well Pumpod Ory: YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS
Trne: .
Gallons Purged: --D.O. (mg,\.): -ORP(m>I): :· ------
Temperature (□C): -----pH:
-----------
.
Specific ConductM!y(s):
other:
Odor. SULFUR / PINE TAR/ NAPL Observed: TAR I FOAM I
End Well Evacua~on (Tme): Tme/Oate:
Total Volume Purged (gal): Time/Date Restart
SAMPl-E COLLECTION INFORMATION
Sample ID: M,\,J-?.,C Split Sample: YESflq
Sample Time/0.at:8: ,'). .... ~ _A lo\1.-<
Duplicate: YE51~ 0) Organi:uition:
Field Blank: YEs, r,O) .
Parameters: Parameters: SAME I OTHER
\J()~
COMMENTS
81 3911d
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WESTONW.O. NO. ______ _
WELL 9/ACUATlONISAMPLING FORM
GENERAL INFORMATION
Well No.: \C\W-~\ We<!lther. 'l () • "i. • C -l._
SamplingTeam: ,__ .. , ... --:;>_ •• Sampler's sgnature: t, ~•l-
• -WELL MEASUREMENTS
Protective Casrng: In@ I DamageiO . Commenb:
l.Oeked: ',e; I NO
Concrete Base: I~ I Damaged
Casing Diameter: 2in., 3in., ~. Sin., Sin. Stickup Height
WELL EVACUATION INFORMATION
A. Total Depth (Top of Casrng = TOG): Wefl Evacuation Method (bailer, submersible pump)
B. Depth to Water (DlW) (TOC): II , 7_' -
C. Column of Standing Water (C=A·B): Begrn WeR Ewcuation (Tme):
0. Pt,r~t. ;-.i(;tn,-Evacuation Rate (gpm):
(2in.:0.16, 3in.;0.J7, 4in.:0.65, 6in.:1.47, S;in.:2.61) .
Drawdown Qbse,ved (H):
E. One Well Volume (gaVLF) (E=CXO): stop Evacuation (rune/Reason):
F. # Volumes to be Pu,ged (3): Restart Time:
G. Total Gallons to be Ev:acustad {G-=FxE): Well Pumped Ory: YES I NO
INDICATOR PARAMETERS .
Trne: '--
Gallons Pul!Jed: --o.o. (mg/I.): r-----.__
ORP (mv): . •'• ---.......
Temperature (DC): ----pH: --.......
Specific Conductivily(s): -Other:
Odoc SULFUR I PINE TAR/ NAPL Observed: TAR I FOAM I
End Well .l'.:vacuation (l'lme): Time/Date:
Total Volume Purged (gal): Tme/Oate Restart:
SAMPLE COLLECTION INFORMATION
Sample ID: ~w ,1.\ Splij Sample: YE~OJ
Sample Time/Date; , ......... -et..l .. ,l~s
Duplicate: YES/N01 • Or'ganization:
F"ld Blank: YESIMOI
Parameters: Parameters; SAME I OTHER
\JOC..r;
COMMENTS
.
51 39\/d SclM
97
ct
~ ~· ~1i,c:,_:_j~~~__j.j);~~#~~~~~W'i:~"JG~*~
. . ~"-! ...... I--+-.
' . ,:i,,.c.•+-1---+~
;-• ,. b -
~ iL )' ... I •
a -.,,.-.
~ ~ ,.. . ~-
I> I
\
~ ,,.
()>
~-
fJ
;,,-.
•
C>_ .,
-
f
" . ti.· " . if ..... ' :,
.~
--~ ~ :;::. ~-F-;. " ~ I" . "' . , ..
~ ,..
·~ "" ~
\ . '.I
l,,. ' -lb . ·•·
I> ' •
0 '·, c.o
CD
101
.•._.-, : .
' -L
.
'
,
.
-
,,i' 1· --::-:-:---t"--~~+4~1-\ffi;~+---·: •·
~--t-.. ,-... ,,. ~~~~:.____.:__..r
-~~-
'---
.
••,,' !,
"';,• . . _;-_ .. , . ·."·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the
express written permission of EPA.
APPENDIX n
February 2005 Semiannual Sampling Event Report
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Section: Appendices
Revision: 0
Date: May 2005
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS
K:\200641205\Second semiannual 3rd year\Feb0SSemiannualRpt.doc RFW205-2A-ATJK
--- -.. ---.. ------ - - -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2141 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW01 /
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XT2
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene ( 1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-0ichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethane (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
· 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/2005 13:45
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-0ichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dlchlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldenlification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
l-ldentification of analyte is acceptable: reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of anatyte can not be determined from dat8 due to severe quality Ccintrol problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
---- --- -- -- ---- - - -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2141 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Gastonia, NC
Id/Station: MW01 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XT2 Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/2005 13:45
Ending:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
2.6 J UG/L 3 UNKNOWNS
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present: analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. j NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control probf9ftfs. Data are rejected-and consid_ered unusable. Page 1 of 1
------ -.. -- - ----- -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2142 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Id/Station: MW02 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XT3
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.24 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2.7
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
5.0 U .
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
2.0
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromelhane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroelhene ( 1, 1-Dichloroelhylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroelhane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-0ichloroethane
Trichloroethane (Trichloroethylene}
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-0ichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Melhyl Bulyl Kelone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.40 J
0.35 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/200514:15
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoelhane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3~Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present: analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable: reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be fess than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. / NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. j A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
-- ----- -.. ------- -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2142 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW02 I
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XT3 Org Contractor: A4
----·---------------------~-----------------------------------
RESULTS UNITS
4.0 J UG/L
7.5 NJ UG/L
ANALYTE
4 UNKNOWNS
CYCLOTETRASILOXANE; OCTAMETHYL-
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/2005 14:15
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of repllcates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due·to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
.. -- -.. -- ---- ------VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2143 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Id/Station: MW03 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XT4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
11
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.20 J
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene (1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifiuoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone ·
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-0ichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-0ichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-0ichloroethane
Trichloroethane (Trichloroethylene)
Methy!cyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-0ichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/200513:15
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable: reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Nol Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determiried fr6m data due.to severe quality conirol problems. Data a·re rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
---- - ----- --- - - -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2143 FY 2005 Project:
MISCELLANEOIIS r.OMPOIINO,S
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW03 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
05-0259
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XT4 Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie ·
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/2005 13:15
Ending:
--------------------------------------··--··-··---------------------
RESULTS UNITS
3.7 J UG/L
4.3 NJ UG/L
ANALYTE
4 UNKNOWNS
CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAEMTHYL-
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab. IDs Not Verified
U-Analyle not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present: ana!yte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data-due to severe! Quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-
-------.. - - - --------VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2144 FY 2005
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW04 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Project 05-0259
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XT5 Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 12:25
Ending:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.73 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene ( 1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-·1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-0ichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.33 J
0.45J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumplive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentificalion of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentificalion of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAl-Not Analyzed due lo Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence of absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-- - -.. ------- ---- --VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2144 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW04 /
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XT5 Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 12:25
Ending:
-------------------------------------------·----------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
1.5 J UG/L 2 UNKNOWNS
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at Or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable: reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-/dentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replica!~. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analytE! can not be det€!rmiri€!d from daia due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
------- ---- -- -- ---VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2145 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Id/Station: MW05 I
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XT6
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U .
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.67
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofiuoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene (1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifiuoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-0ichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-0ichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-0ichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02102/2005 14:30
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chiaro benzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dlchlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. j UJ-Analyle not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; ana1yte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
l-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to lnterterences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
- --- --- ---- -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2145 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW05 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
11 J UG/L 5 UNKNOWNS
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XT6
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 14:30
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. j NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present: analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-tdentilication of anatyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from-data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page1of1
-
-----·---- -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2146 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Id/Station: MW07 I
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XT8
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.79 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.23 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.30 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 u.
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene ( 1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane·
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-0ichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
· Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginn.ing: 02/02/2005 10:45
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
ANALYTE
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chtorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-0ichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Ana!yte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Anatyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence anafyte is present; anatyte reported as tentaUve identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
l-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
- ------ - - -- - ----VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2146 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW07 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
3 UNKNOWNS
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XT8
RESULTS UNITS
2.0 J UG/L
10 NJ UG/L CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL-
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 10:45
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. j NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentificalion of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAl-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or a_bsence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered Unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
----------- ---VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2147 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Id/Station: MW08 I
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XT9
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.91 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.42 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oichlorodifluoromethaae
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene (1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-0ichloroethane
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester: ·
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02102/2005 12:05
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value ls an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence anatyle is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-!dentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of afialyle can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
-------- ---- - -----VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2147 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW0B /
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
4 UNKNOWNS
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XT9
RESULTS UNITS
3.4 J UG/L
13 NJ UG/L CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL-
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 12:05
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of ana1yte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N"Presumptive evidence anatyte is present: analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
l-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased tow. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. J NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence _of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
-.. - ----·--------VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2148 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd Gastonia, NC
Program: SF Case No: 33811
Id/Station: MW09 /
Media:GROUNDWATER D No: 2XW0
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.88 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.15 J
0.50 U
0.93
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
9.4
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.34 J
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene (1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifiuoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-0ichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene (Trich[oroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichlorop"ropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 10:25
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UGIL
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 UJ UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 UJ UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
ANALYTE
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
-
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-tdenlification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumplive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence ana!yte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Act1:1al value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page1of1
--------- -.. ---·-VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2148 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW09 I
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
1.4J UG/L 2 UNKNOWNS
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XWO
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 10:25
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting !imit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present: analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentifrcalion of analyte is acceptable: reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. J NAl•Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A•Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average'' of replicates.
R-Pr_:sence .or absence <?f analyt~ can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems .. Data are rejected and considered u·nusable. Page 1 of 1
iiii ----- ------VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2149 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Id/Station: MW10 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XW1
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.78 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene (1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-0ichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 14:10
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
ANALYTE
Oibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-0ichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-tdentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. J UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present: analyte reported as tentative identification. l NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldenlification of analyte is acceptable: reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable: reported value may b8 biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
- -----------·----VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2149 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW10 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
5 UNKNOWNS
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XW1
RESULTS
8.0 J
27 NJ
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL-
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 14:10
Ending:
U-Ana1yte not detected at or above reporting limit. J J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N•Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported ·as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as t8ntative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of anatyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is QaverageQ of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data· are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
-·-- -- - - - - -- --- - -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2150 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Id/Station: MW11 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XW2
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.92 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.16 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene (1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifiuoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-0ichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichtoroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-0ichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requestor:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 09:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDS)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-0ichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-0ichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trich!orobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable: reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analy\e not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is ·acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unuSable. Page 1 of 1
-
---- - - -- - - ------ - -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2150 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW11 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
4 UNKNOWNS
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XW2
RESULTS
10 J
1.7 NJ
39 NJ
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
CYCLOTRISILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL-
CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL-
Dala Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 09:00
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of anafyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is ~average~ of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected-and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
- -- - - ----- --- ---VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2151 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Id/Station: MW12 I
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XW3
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.80 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2.2
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.2
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene ( 1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifiuoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced by: Appl.eby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/2005 14:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Brollloform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-0ichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; ana/yte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-!dentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification·of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA•Not Analyzed. j NAt-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
-- ---- - -- - - ------VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA-REGION IV SESO, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2151 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW 12 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
3 UNKNOWNS
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XW3
RESULTS
2.0 J
7.7 NJ
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL-
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/2005 14:00
Ending:
U-Ana!yte not detected at or above reporting limit. ! J-ldentification 'of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present: analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased !ow. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. j NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence or analyle can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
------ - - -- -- --- -VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2152 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
ld/Station:MW14 /
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XW4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene ( 1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifiuoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/2005 15:00
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
ANALYTE
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-0ichlorobenzene
1,4-0ichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane·(DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. l UJ-Ana!yte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive ev!dence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentiflcation of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality_ control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
----- -- - ------- --VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2152 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW14 I
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XW4
RESULTS
0.97 NJ
23 NJ
1.3 J
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
CYCLOTRISILOXANE, HEXAMETHYL-
CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL-
2 UNKNOWNS
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 0210112005 15:00
Ending:
-
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
l-ldenlification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe q~ality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
- ----- - ------- - ---VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2153 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW 15 /
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XW5
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.92 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
8.9 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.090 J
0.22 J
3.6
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
39
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.30 J
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene (1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Triftuoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-0ichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-0ichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/2005 14:25
Ending:
UNITS
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDS)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropy!benzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
-------------------------------------------------------------------
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldenlification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldenlification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
---- ------- - -- ---VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2153 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW 15 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
3.6 J UG/L 3 UNKNOWNS
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XW5
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/2005 14:25
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable: reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence anatyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentificalion of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-lden!lfication of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. ! NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
- -------- - -- -- ---VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2155 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Id/Station: MW16 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XW7
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
.UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene (1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifiuoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
T etr_achloroethene {T etrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 11 :40
Ending:
RES UL TS UNITS
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UGIL
0.50 U UGIL
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UGIL
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
0.50 U UG/L
ANALYTE
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDS)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-0ichlorobenzene
1,4-0ichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of anafyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. [ NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
- -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS. EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2155 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW16 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
4 UNKNOWNS
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XW7
RESULTS
3.2 J
9.3 NJ
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL-
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 11 :40
Ending:
U•Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of anatyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumplive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. J A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average~ of replicates."
R-Presence or absence of analyte ca~ not be determined from da_ta du~ to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-------- --- -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA-REGION IV SESO, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2156 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
ld/Station:MW17 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XW8
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.84 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.88
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.22 J
0.50
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
12
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.3
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene ( 1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifiuoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone·
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
. 0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 09:55
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dibromochlorornethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dlchlorobenzene
1,2-Dlchlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldenlification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence a"nalyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be.less than the reported value.
-L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is ~average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte" can n6t be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
------------ -VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS . EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2156 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW17 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
4 UNKNOWNS
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XW8
RESULTS
5.4 J
11 NJ
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL-
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 09:55
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence ana!yte is present: analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentiftcation of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual.value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analytE:_ can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
- - --------------VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESO, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2157 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Id/Station: MW18 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XW9
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U·
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.8
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
3.9
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L ·
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene (1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-0ichloroethane
Trichloroethane (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-0ichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 09:35
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be fess than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality cC!nlrol problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable.
Page1of1
-
-- --- - - - - --- - - - - - -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2157 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW18 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XW9
RESULTS
0.72 NJ
1.4 J
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL-
2 UNKNOWNS
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 09:35
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. l UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present: analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable: reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-/dentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may·be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined.from data due to sevei-e quality control probleins. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
-------- --- - --- - - -VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2158 FY 2005
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW 19 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Project: 05-0259
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XX0 Org Contractor: A4
-----~-------------------------------------··-
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.84 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.25 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.25 J
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
. UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene (1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-0ichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-0ichloroethane
Trichloroethane (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-0ichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/200511:10
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-0ichlorobenzene
1,4-0ichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. f J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. j NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAJ-Not Analyzed due to lnterierences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data.due.to severe quality control problems. Data are-rejected and considered unusable.
Page 1 of 1
-
- ---- - - - -- - - -----VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2158 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW19 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XXO
RESULTS UNITS
0.70 NJ UG/L
21 J UG/L
CYCLOTRISILOXANE, HEXAMETHYL-
3 UNKNOWNS
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Org Contraclor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 11:10
Ending:
U-Anatyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. UJ-Ana1yte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present: analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present: analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of-anatyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A•Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is baverage" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are.rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
---- ---- -- - - -- -- -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2159 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd Gastonia, NC
Program: SF Case No: 33811
Id/Station: MW20 /
Media:GROUNDWATER D No: 2XX1
RESULTS
0.50 U
1.2 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
70
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
· 0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.35 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Ch!oroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene ( 1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
T etrachloroethene (T etrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.1
1.2
0.50 U
0.62 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/2005 12:45
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDS)
Ch!orobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Tridilorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identificati~n. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of-analyte can not-be determined-from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
- ----- ------ -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS - - - - -
EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2159 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW20 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
4 UNKNOWNS
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XX1
RESULTS
15 J
1.7 NJ
19 NJ
0.55 NJ
.UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
CYCLOTRISILOXANE, HEXAMETHYL-
CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL-
BENZENE, 1,3,5-TRIMETHYL-
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab - I Os Not Verified
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/2005 12:45
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported vatue is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable ..
Page 1 of 1
-
-- - - -- - - -- - - - -- ---VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2160 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW21 /
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XX2
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.86 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.2 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
5.0 UR
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
5.0 UR
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene (1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifiuoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-0ichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-0ichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrach!oroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.1
1.6
0.50 U
0.55 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0:50 UJ
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/2005 12:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Ana!yte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-!dentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentiflcation of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. j NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be dete~mined_!rom data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
-- - - - - - - -- - - - - ----VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2160 FY 2005 Project:
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW21 I
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
05-0259
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XX2
RESULTS UNITS
3.2 NJ UG/L
0.98 J UG/L
CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL-
UNKNOWN
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab· IDs Not Verified
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/2005 12:00
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identificatior_.. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Nol Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
-- -- - -- - - -- - ------VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2162 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Id/Station: MW09D /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XX4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.85 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.18 J
0.50 U
1.2
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
12
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
5.0 UR
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.51
5.0 UR
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dlchlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene ( 1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
· Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
Methy[cyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-0ichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
T etrachloroethene {T etrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 10:25
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chloroberizene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbe·nzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected al or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data d~e to severe quality ~antral problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
-- - -- - --- -- - --- ---VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2162 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW09D /
Media: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
UNKNOWN
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XX4
RESULTS
0.51 J
0.51 NJ
1.9 NJ
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
CYCLOTRISILOXANE, HEXAMETHYL-
CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL-
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Org Contraclor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
RE!questor:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 10:25
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable: reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed-in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyt~ can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. · Page 1 of 1
-
-- - ----- - -- - - - - -- -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA . Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2139 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: Dl1 /
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Media: DI WATER
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.17 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
D No: 2XTO
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene (1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifiuoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-0ichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichtoroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethane (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 13:25
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDS)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-0ichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4_-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value. 1~ -
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data Que to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
-------·-- ---- - - -- -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50 ·
Sample 2139 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: Dl1 /
Media: DI WATER
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
2.0 J UG/L 4 UNKNOWNS
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XT0
5.1 NJ UG/L CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 13:25
Ending:
····----------------------------------------------------------------
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
--- ----- -- - -- - --- -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2140 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: EB1 /
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Media: EQUIPMENT RINSE BLANK D No: 2XT1
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.18 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dichlorodifluoromethane .
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloro8thane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene (1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-0ichloroethane
cis-1,2-0ichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethane (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 13:30
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropy!benzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-0ichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to.be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined-from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
--- ---- --- ---- - - -
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2140 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: EB1 /
Media: EQUIPMENT RINSE BLANK
ANALYTE
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XT1
RESULTS
3.6 NJ
1.5 J
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL
2 UNKNOWNS
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/02/2005 13:30
Ending:
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyle not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. ] NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte r8ported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be.determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
------- ---- ----·--VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2161 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: TB1 I
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Media: TRIP BLANK -WATER D No: 2XX3
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.94 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.19 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene (1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethene (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane"
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (Tetrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 UJ
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02101/2005 07:25
Ending:
UNITS
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
ANALYTE
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-0ichlorobenzene
1,2-0ichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
________________________________________ , __________________________________ _
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldenlification of ana!yte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present: analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Nol Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data du_e to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
------ ----- ------VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2161 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Id/Station: TB 1 /
Media: TRIP BLANK. WATER
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XX3 Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/2005 07:25
Ending:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULTS UNITS
1.1 NJ · UG/L
ANALYTE
CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL-
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab· IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte rep_orted as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K•ldentification of anatyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be-less than the reported value.
L-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or aDsence ot·analyte can n6t be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered Unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
------- --- --------VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28i2005 07:50
Sample 2154 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
Volatiles Scan
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Gastonia, NC
Case No: 33811
Id/Station: MW15D /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 2XW6
RESULTS
a.sou
0.88 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
6.4 U
0.50 U
0.50 U a.so uJ a.sou a.sou
0.50 U
3.4
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.25 J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
39
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.37 J
5.0 U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L'
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1, 1-Dichloroethene (1, 1-Dichloroethylene)
1, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifiuoroethane (Freon 113)
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
Methyl Acetate
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl T-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
1, 1-Dichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Bromochloromethane
Chloroform
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Cyclohexane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethane (Trichloroethylene)
Methylcyclohexane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
T etrachloroethene (T etrachloroethylene)
Methyl Butyl Ketone
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/2005 14:25
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Oibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl Benzene
Total Xylenes
Styrene
Bromoform
lsopropylbenzene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present: analyte reported as tentative identification. I NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-ldenlification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control·problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
---- - ---- --- -- - -VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 03/28/2005 07:50
Sample 2154 FY 2005 Project: 05-0259
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: Davis Park Rd
Program: SF
Gastonia, NC
Id/Station: MW 15D /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 33811
D No: 2XW6 Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Appleby, Charlie
Requester:
Project Leader: JWENDEL
Beginning: 02/01/2005 14:25
Ending:
--------------------------------------------·----------
RESULTS
4.3 J
18 NJ
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
4 UNKNOWNS
CYCLOTETRASILOXANE, OCTAMETHYL-
Data Reported as Identified by CLP Lab -IDs Not Verified
U-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. I J-ldentification of anafyte is acceptable; reported value is an estimate. I UJ-Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. Reporting limit is an estimate.
N-Presumptive evidence analyte is present; analyte reported as tentative identification. j NJ-Presumptive evidence analyte is present: analyte reported as tentative identification. Reported value is an estimate.
K-ldentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased high. Actual value expected to be less than the reported value.
L-Jdentification of analyte is acceptable; reported value may be biased low. Actual value expected to be greater than reported value.
NA-Not Analyzed. I NAI-Not Analyzed due to Interferences. I A-Analyte analyzed in replicate. Reported value is "average" of replicates.
R-Presence or absence of analyte can not be determined from data due to severe quality control problems. Data are rejected and considered unusable. Page 1 of 1
-
Case
Number:
Site ID.
Affected
Samples
Volatiles
2139
2140
2141
2142
2143
2144
2145
33811
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
sow
Project Number 05-0259 Number --------
Davis Park Rd., Gastonia, NC
Flag
OLC03.2
Date 03/08/05
Compound or Fraction Used Reason
methylene chloride
chloroform
cis-1,3-dichloropropene, trans-1,3-dichloropropene,
1, 1,2-trichloroethane, 1, 1,2,2-tetrachloroethane,
1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
methylene chloride
chloroform
methylene chloride
methylene chloride
I, I, I-trichloroethane, ethyl benzene, xylene (total)
cis-1,3-dichloropropenc, trans-1,3-clichloropropcnc,
I, 1,2-trichlorocthane
methyl acetate, methylene chloride
tetrachloroethene
methyl acetate, methylene chloride
cis-1,3-dichloropropene, trans-1,3-dichloropropene,
I, 1,2-trichloroethane ·
ethylbenzenc, xylene (total)
methyl acetate, methylene chloride
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
.I
.I
J
J
J
J
J
J
erratic continuing
calibration
< quantitation
limit
lowDMC¾R
erratic continuing·
calibration
< quantitation
limit
erratic continuing
calibration
erratic continuing
calibration
< quantitation
limit
lowDMC¾R
erratic continuing
calibration
< quantitation
limit
erratic continuing
calibration
lowDMC¾R
< quantitation
limit
erratic continuing
calibration
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Case
Number:
Site ID.
Affected
Samples
2146
2147
2148
2149
2150
2151
2152
2153
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
sow
33811 Project Number 05-0259 Number OLC03.2 -----
Davis Park Rd., Gastonia, NC
Compound or Fraction
methyl acetate, methylene chloride
methyl tert-butyl ether, chloroform
benzene, trichlorocthenc, toluene,
tetraehlorocthene, ethylbenzcne, xylene (total),
styrene, isopropylbenzene
methyl acetate, methylene chloride
methyl tert-butyl ether
methylene chloride
methyl tert-butyl ether, tetrachloroelhene
cis-1,3-dichloropropene, trans-1,3-dichloropropene,
I, 1,2-trichloroethane, I, 1,2,2-tetrachlorocthane,
1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropanc
methyl acetate, methylene chloride
methyl acetate, methylene chloride
methyl acetate, methylene chloride
methyl acetate, methylene chloride
methylene chloride
methyl tert-butyl ether, I, 1-dichloroethane
Date 03/08/05
Flag
Used Reason
J erratic continuing
calibration
J
J
J
.I
J
.r
J
.r
J
J
J
J
J
< quantitation
limit
lowDMC%R
erratic continuing
calibration
< quantitation
limit
erratic continuing
calibration
< quantitation
limit
lowDMC%R
erratic continuing
calibration
erratic continuing
calibration
erratic continuing
calibration
erratic continuing
calibration
erratic continuing
calibration
< quantitation
limit
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Case
Number:
Site ID.
Affected
Samples
2154
2155
2156
2157
2158
2159
2160
2161
ORGANIC DAT A QUALIFIER REPORT
sow
33811 Project Number 05-0259 Number OLC03.2 ---,---
Davis Park Rd., Gastonia, NC
Compound or Fraction
methylene chloride
chloroform, tetrachloroethene
methyl acetate, methylene chloride
methylene chloride
chlorororm
methyl acetate, methylene chloride
methyl acetate, methylene chloride
trichloroethene, tetrachloroethene
methylene chloride, 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene
toluene
methylene chloride, 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene
cis-1,3-dichloropropene, trans-1,3-dichloropropene,
I, 1,2-trichloroethane, I, 1,2,2-tetrachloroethane,
1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
4-mcthyl-2-pentanonc, 2-hexanone
methylene chloride, 1,2,3-trichlorobenzcne
chloroform
Date 03/08/05
Flag
Used Reason
J erratic continuing
calibration
J < quantitation
limit
J erratic continuing
calibration
J erratic continuing
calibration
J
.I
]
]
]
]
J
J
R
]
J
< quantitation
limit
erratic continuing
calibration
erratic continuing
calibration
< quantitation
limit
erratic continuing
calibration
< quantitation
limit
erratic continuing
calibration
lowDMC¾R
lowDMC¾R
(< 10%)
erratic continuing
calibration
< quantitation
limit
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Case
Number:
Site ID.
Affected
Samples
2162
ORGANIC DAT A QUALIFIER REPORT
33811 Project Number 05-0259 ------------
Davis Park Rd., Gastonia, NC
Compound or Fraction
methylene chloride, 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene
methyl tert-butyl ether
cis-1,3-dichloropropene, trans-1,3-dichloropropenc,
1, 1,2-trichloroethane
4-methyl-2-pentanone, 2-hexanone
sow
Number OLC03.2
Date 03/08/05
Flag
Used Reason
J erratic continuing
calibration
J < quantitation
limit
J low DMC¾R
R lowDMC¾R
(< 10%)