NCD981021157_20031118_New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit_FRBCERCLA SAP QAPP_Initial Monitoring Report-OCR

I
m
D
E
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INITIAL MONITORING REPORT
NEW HANOVER COUNTY AIRPORT
BURN PIT SUPERFUND SITE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA '
NOVEMBER 18, 2003
PREPARED FOR:
NOV 2 O 2003
NEW HANOVER COUNTY, THE CITY OF WILMINGTON AND CAPE IIEAR
COMMUNITY COLLEGE .
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
CATLIN PROJECT NO. 194-040
PREPARED BY:
CATLIN ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS
P. 0. BOX 10279
\VILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28404-0279
[phone]
I
•
D
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LIST OF ACRONYMS
1.0 . PURPOSE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
,\)
2.0 . SITE GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS
3.0 SITE MONITORING PLAN
4.0 SITE ACTIVE REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES
4.1 PULSE AIR SPARGE (PAS)
4.1.1 Pulse Air Sparge Description
4.1.2 Performance
5.0 SUMMARY OF SURFICIAL GROUNDWATER TABLE DATA
6.0 SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY TESTING
6.1 FJELD MEASUREMENTS (DISSOLVED OXYGEN)
6.2 GROUNDWATER SAMPUNG · '
6.3 GROUNDWATER QUALITY -EPA METHOD 602
7.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
7.1 CONCLUSIONS
7.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
8.0 · LIMITATIONS
PAGE
i
.1
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
New Hanover County Burn Pit; 94040_mon_rpt_0l.doc
CA TL/ N Project No. 194-040
CATLIN Engineers and Sdentists
November 2003
I
I
I
g
D
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLES
/~
TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA AND
GROUNDWATER TABLE ELEVATIONS AS OF NOVEMBER 3, 2003
TABLE 2 HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER TABLE ELEVATIONS
TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY FIELD PARAMETERS-
(DISSOLVED OXYGEN)
TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF CURRENT GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS
TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER LABORATORY
RESULTS
J<'IGURE 1
FIGURE2
FIGURE3
FIGURE4
FIGURES
FIGURES
GENERAL LOCATION USGS TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE
SITE MAP WITH CURRENT MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS.
SITE MAP WITH CURRENT PULSE AIR SPARGE (PAS) LOCATIONS
SITE MAP WITH GROUNDWATER TABLE CONTOURS AS OF
NOVEMBER 3, 2003
SITE MAP WITH BENZENE CONCENTRATIONS AS OF
SEPTEMBER 5, 2003 ·
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
APPENDIXB
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS AND CHAIN OF
CUSTODY DOCUMENTS
BENZENE CONCENTRATION VS. TIME GRAPH
New Hanover County Burn Pit; 94040_mon_rpt_()J.doc
CATLIN Project No. 194-040
CA TL/ N Engineers and Scientists
Noveml>er 2003
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
2000 Guidelines
2001 Guidelines
2LGWQS
ARO
AS
AST
BDL.
BN
BNA
BQL
BLS
BTEX
CAP
CATLIN
CFR
Cr
CSA
CNP
CPT
DEM
DIPE
DO
DOD
DPT
DWQ
DWM
DTW
EAD
EDB
EMD
EPA
EPH
EQB
Fe
FID
FOD
FRO
FT
GCL
GIS
GPS
LIST OF ACRONYMS
Groundwater Section Guidelines for Investigation and Remediation of Soil and
Groundwater.
Guidelines for Assessment and Corrective Action, North Carolina Underground Storage
Tank Section (Effective July I, 2001)
NCAC Tl5A:02L Groundwater Quality Standards
Asheville Regional Office
Air Sparge
Aboveground Storage Tank
Below Detection Limit
Base/Neutral (cxtractables)
Base/Neutral/Acid (extractables)
Below Quantitation Limit
Below Land Surface
Benzene, To_luene, Ethylbenzene, Xylenes
Corrective Action Plan
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists (Formerly RC&A)
Code of Federal Regulations
Chromium
Comprehensive Site Assessment
Carbon Nitrogen Phosphorous
Cone Penetrometer Test
Division of Environmental Management
Diisopropyl Ether
Dissolved Oxygen
Department of Defense
Direct Push Technology
Division of Water Quality
Division of Waste Management
Depth to Water
Environmental Affairs Department
Ethylene di-bromide
Environmental Management Division
Environmental Protection Agency
Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Environmental Quality Branch
Iron
Flame Ionization Detector
Foreign Object Debris
Fayetteville Regional Office
Feet
Gross Contaminant Level
Geographic Information System
Global Positioning System
New Hanover County Burn Pit; 94040_mo11_rpt_0J.doc
CATLIN Project No. 194-040
CA TL/ N Engineers and Scientists
November 2003
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Guidelines Vol. I
Guidelines Vol. II
HOPE
UC
ID
l&E
IGWQS
!PE,
LANTDIV
LSA
LUST
m-
m
MADEP
MCALF
MCAS
MCB
MCOLF
MDL
mg/Kg
mg/L
MRO
MSCC
MSL
MTBE
µg/Kg
µg/L
NA
NIA
NC
NCAC
NCDENR
NCDOC
NCDOT
NCSP
NCSPA
NE
NM
NMT
NS
a-
OVA
Groundwater Section Guidelines for Investigation and Remediation of Soil and Groundwater,
Volume I, Sour,es Other Than Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks (May 1998) ,I•
Groundwater Section Guidelines for Investigation and Remediation of Soil and Groundwater,
Volume II, Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks (January 2; 1998)
High Density Polyethylene
Industrial/Commercial
Identification
Installations and Environment Department
Interim Groundwater Quality Standards
lsopropyl Ether
Atlantic Division
Limited Site Assessment
Leaking Underground Storage Tank
meta
meter
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Marine Corps Auxiliary Landing Field
Marine Corps Air. Station
Marine Corps Base
Marine Corps Outlying Landing Field
Method Detection Limit
Milligrams per Kilogram.
Milligrams per Litre
Mooresville Regional Office
Maximum Soil Contaminant Concentration
Mean Sea Level
Methyl tertiary butyl ether
Micrograms per Kilogram
Micrograms per Litre
Not Analyzed
Not Applicable
North Carolina
North Carolina Administrative Code
North Caro.lina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
North CarOiina Department of Corrections
North Carolina Department of Transportation
North Carolina State Plane
North Carolina State Ports Authority
None Established
Not Measured
No Measurable Thickness
Not Sampled
ortho
Organic Vapor Analyzer
New Hanover County Burn Pit; 94040_mou_rpt_Ol.doc
CATLIN Project No. 194-040 II
CATLIN E11gi11eers a11d Scientists
November 2003
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
p-
PAH
Pb
PPB
PPM
PID
PQL
PVC
RBCA
RCRA
Res
·ROI
RRO
SOW
STOW
SVE
svoc
TDHF
TCLP
TIC
TKN
TOC
TPH
us uses
USEPA
USGS
UST
voe
VPH
.WaRO
WiRO
WSRO
para
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Lead
Parts Per Billion
Parts Per Million
Photo Ionization Detector
Practical Quantitation Limit
Polyvinyl chloride
Risk-Based Corrective Action
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Residential
Radius of Influence
Raleigh Regional Office
Scope of Work
Soil-to-Groundwater
Soil Vapor Extraction
Semi.Volatile Organic Compound
Toxicologically Defined Hydrocarbons Fractions
T1?xicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Tentatively Identified Compound
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Top of Casing
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
United States
Unified Soil Classification System
United States Environmental Protection Agency
United States Geological Survey
Underground Storage Tank
Volatile Organic Compounds
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Washington Regional Office
Wilmington Regional Office
Winston-Salem Regional Office
New Hanover County Burn Pit; 94040_mon_rpt_0J.doc
CATLIN Project No. 194-040 Ill
CA TL/ N E11gi11eers and Scientists
November 2003
I
I
m
n
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.0,
2.0
INITIAL MONITORING REPORT
;~
NEW HANOVER COUNTY AIRPORT BURN PIT SUPERFUND SITE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
NOVEMBER 18, 2003
CATLIN PROJECT NO. 194-040
PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to present data regarding surficial groundwater quality and
remediation efforts (June 2002 through September 2003) at the New Hanover County Airport
Burn Pit Superfund Site on Gardner Drive, Wilmington, North Carolina (see Figure 1).
Historic usage of the site has impacted.the site surficial groundwater with dissolved Volatile
Organic Compounds (VOC) in excess of current NCAC Tl5A:02L North Carolina
Groundwater Quality Standards (2L GWQS). This report focuses on site groundwater
remediation and monitoring efforts completed since the groundwater treatment system startup
in June 2003.
SITE GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS
Currently, there are sixteen monitoring wells selected to monitor groundwater characteristics on
site (see Figure 2). They were positioned to encompass the compliance boundary and ensure
effective monitoring of the contaminant plume. The monitoring wells are screened at depths
ranging from approximately one to twenty-eight feet below land surface (BLS). Monitoring
well construction data is provided in Table I. Monitoring wells within the historic dissolved
benzene plume boundary have been designated performance verification wells and are intended
to provide data points to monitor the reduction of groundwater contaminants. Wells outside the
historic dissolved benzene plume boundary have been designated compliance monitoring wells
and are used to evaluate potential dissolved plume migration.
Performance verification monitoring wells are located in interstitial zones between sparge
points and are used to obtain data regarding contaminant reduction and dissolved oxygen levels,
generally within the deeper portion of the surficial aquifer. One performance verification
monitoring well (PVSMW-002) is screened from one to ten feet BLS. PVSMW-002 shall be
used to verify contaminant reduction within the shallow portion of the surficial aquifer.
Note: Monitoring well PVMW-7 has been renamed as PVMW-015 in order to better correlate
with the well identification sequence already established for the site.
New Hanover County Burn Pit; 94040_mon_rpt_0l.doc
CATUN Project No. 194-040
CA TL/ N Engineers and Scientists
November 2003
D
D
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. 1
I
I
3.0
4.0
SITE MONITORING PLAN
Monthly
CATLIN personnel conduct the following activities on a monthly basis:
• Check and adjust system to ensure proper operation.
• Measure dissolved oxygen (DO) in MWD-002.
Quarterly (December, March, June and September)
The quarterly visit activities will be conducted only for the first year and semi-annually
thereafter.
In addition to the monthly activities, CATLIN personnel also conduct the following activities
on a quarterly basis:
•
•
•
•
Check system operation .
Gauge and sample performance verification and compliance monitoring wells per
EPA Method 602 ..
Measure DO in MWD-002 .
Prepare a monitoring report for submission to USEPA, NCDENR and PRPs. The
report will include:
system status
groundwater table contour map
updated groundwater contaminant isoconcentration map
tabulated laboratory analysis summary table
independent laboratory reports
SITE ACTIVE REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES
In accordance with the site Final Design Remedial Report, the performance goal for
retnediating non-compliant VOC concentrations within the impacted site surficial aquifer is
1 ug/L of benzene or as agreed to by involved entities. A pulse air sparge system consisting . .
of 79 injection wells has been designed and installed at the site to remediate. the dissolved
·voe groundwater plume. The locations of the current PAS injection wells are shown on
Figure 3 .
New Hanover County Burn Pit; 94040_mon_rpt_0J.doc CATLIN E11gi11eers and Scientists
November 2003 CATLIN Project No. 194-040 2
I
I
D
u
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5.0
4.1 PULSE AJR SPARGE (PAS)
4.1.1 Pulse Air Sparge Description
Pulse Air Sparge (PAS) consists of injecting a pulse of ambient air within or
below the contaminated zone of the impacted aquifer, through an air sparge
well. As air is injected into the aquifer, a de-watered sphere grows around
the sparge point. This spherical volume of air continues to grow displacing
groundwater until the top of the sphere is about to "breakthrough" the surface
of the ground water table. Prior to "breakthrough", the air injection is
terminated and the surrounding aquifer is allowed to recharge the sparged
· zone before the next "pulse".
The intent of this activity is to volatilize dissolved gasoline compounds
within the impacted aquifer, and supply oxygen to indigenous aerobic
micr.obes. Indigenous aerobic microbe species important in dissolved
gasoline compound degradation utilize dissolved oxygen (or DO) from the
aquifer as an electron acceptor to convert dissolved gasoline compounds to
CO2, water, and biomass: · Aeration efforts of the PAS system replenish
dissolved oxygen into the aquifer. Studies have repeatedly shown aerobic
microbes, as opposed to anaerobic microbes, biodegrade dissolved gasoline
compounds more rapidly. ·
4.1.2 Performance
The PAS system performance was optimized during system calibration.
Calibration of the PAS system occurred for approximately two weeks
following system start-up. The calibration period consisted of adjusting
airflow to specific zones in order to optimize performance and abandoning
and re-drilling air sparge wells that were short-circuiting. Since start-up
(May 2003), the PAS system has operated approximately 98% of the time.
The 2% downtime was due to power outages during local electrical storms.
The PAS system air compressor 3-phase power supply has been sensitive to
power fluctuations. CATLIN personnel have been monitoring the PAS
system to ensure its continuous operation. Groundwater remediation
efficiency due to the PAS systemis evaluated by reviewing the groundwater
dissolved gasoline compound concentrations trend over time.
SUMMARY OF SURFICIAL GROUNDWATER TABLE DA TA
•·Each of the site monitoring well top of casing (TOC) elevations has been surveyed in relation
to mean sea level (MSL). The latest groundwater table depths were obtained at all site
monitoring wells on November 3, 2003. The depth to groundwater table data has been
subtracted from the TOC elevation to determine the site surficial groundwater table
elevations as of November 3, 2003. This latest groundwater table data has been summarized
on Table I. To evaluate surficial groundwater flow direction and gradient, the groundwater
New Hanover County Burn Pit; 94040_11,on_rpC0l.doc CA TL/ N Engineers and Scientists
November 2003 CATLIN Project No. 194-040 3
I
I
m
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6.0.
elevation data was entered into a contouring software program (AutoCAD Land
Development). Current dat,~ indicates a relatively flat groundwater table bt!neath the site
with varying components of flow. In the northeast region of the site, groundwater appears to
be flowing toward the northeast, while south and southwesterly components of flow exist
beneath the southwest region of the site. Historically, groundwater flow directions have been
similar to current observations. Groundwater flow will continue to be monitored in order to
monitor its correlation with operation of the remediation system. The latest (November 3,
· · 2003) surficial groundwater table contour data has been illustrated on Figure 4.
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY TESTING
>>
Prior to system installation, CA TUN personnel conducted a site groundwater sampling event to
provide a pre-construction baseline of the dissolved contaminant plume. On September 4 and
5, 2003, CATLIN conducted a sampling event as part of the initial monitoring period. During
each sampling event, CATLIN personnel recorded selected groundwater field parameter data
and obtained groundwater samples in general accordance with the following procedures.
6.1 FJELD MEASUREMENTS (DISSOLVED OXYGEN)
Groundwater DO measurements were taken to characterize site conditions and
potential influence from the PAS system. DO measurements collected during this
most recent sampling event (September 4 and 5, 2003), obtained using a YSIModel
650 multi-parameter water quality instrument and Model 600XL sonde, were erratic.
In order to verify the accuracy of these measurements, measurements were re-taken
on September 11 and 12, 2003. In an attempt to verify the precision and accuracy of
the equipment and methods cif measurement, a YSI 55 DO meter was rented from Pine
Environmental Services, Inc. Both instruments were utilized on September 24, 2003,
yet DO readings continued to be erratic and inconsistent.
According to technical advice provided by Pine Environmental Services, Inc., the
inconsistencies in DO measurements encountered at the site may have been due to
contaminants interfering with the transmission of oxygen across the semi-permeable
membrane that covers the DO sensor. According to Pine Environmental technicians,
semi-permeable membranes are extremely sensitive and even low contaminant
concentrations can impair their function.
DO field parameter measurements recorded on September 24, 2003 are listed in
Table 3.
A DO measurement was taken from within MWD-002 at a depth of twenty-one feet
BLS on September 25, 2003. MWD-002 was chosen to gauge performance of the
pulse air sparge system due to its central location in relation to the site, its position in
an interstitial zone between sparge points and the depth of its screened interval. A
DO measurement of 0.49 mg/L was recorded for MWD-002. DO levels for MWD-
002 will continue to be monitored at the site as proposed.
New Hanover County Burn PU; 94040_mon_rpt_0J.doc CA TL/ N Engineers and Scientists
November 2003 CA TL/ N Project No. 194-040 4
I
I
I
n
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6.2
6.3
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
Prior to sampling, each well was purged to ensure the collected sample was
representative of the surficial aquifer. Purging was performed by first removing a
minimum of three well volumes from each monitoring well using disposable bailers. A
pump was then used to extract groundwater from each well. The extracted groundwater
was delivered to a flow-through cell via clean polyethylene tubing and temperature,
· conductivity, and pH were measured using a YSI Model 650 multi-parameter water
quality instrument with Model 600XL sonde. Measurements were recorded at one
minute intervals until the readings had equilibrated. Once stabilized, the well was
sampled and the recorded data was used to document the selected field parameters.
Groundwater samples were obtained from new polyethylene tubing attached to the
discharge end of the test cell. The Model 600XL sonde, as well as the test cell were
cleaned after each sample was collected in accordance with the manufacturer's
instructions .. A new set of disposable gloves and bailer were utilized for each sample
collected.
Each sample was placed in laboratory prepared sample glassware labeled with the well
ID, sample date, site name, sampler, and placed in an iced cooler. For analysis by a
certified lab, samples were delivered to Paradigm Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
(Paradigm; North Carolina Certification #481) in Wilmington, North Carolina. To
determine groundwater concentrations of remnant0dissolved gasoline compounds, all
groundwater samples were analyzed for volatile compounds (in ug/L) per EPA Method
602.
GROUNDWATER QUALITY -EPA METHOD 602
Laboratory analysis of the surficial groundwater samples for EPA Method 602 ·
analytes revealed BQL or compliant concentrations per applicable 2L GWQS for
groundwater, with the exception of benzene. Benzene was detected above applicable
2L GWQS ( I ug/L) in three groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells
MWD-002, MWD-006, and PVMW-014.
Benzene concentrations as evaluated from latest sample event (September 4 and 5,
2003) data, can be summarized as follows:
, .,.,.,::t,.:;iif,,:; .. ;"i'•< ·; i'. .: : •.,;, ·,\'.. i Beniene-Ciiiicentr:frions' in;i,,,i'L •' t., c'i,1:',f'."''.fo , f_,,, ;-· _, i.\; :'I·.µ w,·~J,nr,_,
!iil'~!~--w eII · 10:~~r:1:::-,: ,~ HistoriC'3h Hi Pm,·· 11:.,.· HiStOfiCSI-L'OWJ,_: '., ··BaSCiiOe ·t\11:f1w-;; ~.tf\[\; lLOiCShYr~i ·:,tt
MWD-001 15 <0.5 <0.5 <I
MWD-002 136 4.3 18.6 47
MWD-006 3.4 <0.5 3.4 1.5
PVMW-011 2.6 <I 2.6 <l
PVMW-014 5 4.4 4.4 5
PVMW-015 4.1 <l 4.1 <l
New Hanover County Burn Pit; 94040_mo11_rpt_0l.doc CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2003 CATLIN Project No. 194-040 5
I
I
I
D
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7.0
Figure 5 illustrates the benzene concentrations within the site surficial groundwater as
of September 5, 200J.
The latest groundwater sample analytical results have been summarized on Table 4.
Historical EPA Method 602 analysis results have been summarized on Table 5. · A copy
of the Paradigm laboratory report for the latest sample event has been provided in
Appendix A. To illustrate the historical groundwater remediation trend, a graphical
· representation of historical benzene concentrations at site monitoring wens MWD-002,
MWD-006, PVMW-011, PVMW-014 and PVMW-015 has been prepared (see
Appendix B). ·
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
7.1 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the field and laboratory data obtained during the most recent monitoring
period, the following conclusions are provided:
Active Remediation System Operation
• The PAS system ha_s been operating properly for approximately 98% of the
period from early May 2003 to the present Local power outages, due to
electrical storms, have occasionally turned off the PAS system.
Surficial Groundwater Quality
• The accuracy of DO measurements at this time were questioned; however, of the
wells within the historic plume boundary, those nearest the plume edge displayed
relatively higher levels of DO compared to wells within the "hotter" spots.
• The latest groundwater analyses revealed the site surficial groundwater remains
impacted with benzene concentrations in excess of applicable 2L GW'QS.
In reviewing the historical dissolved contaminant concentration data (Table 5 and
graph in Appendix B), the overall trend indicates a progressive decline in benzene
concentrations at all monitoring well locations. Compared to the baseline data,
MWD-002 exhibited a rise 1047 ug/L from 18.6 ug/L and PVMW-014rose to 5 ug/L
from 4.4 ug/L. Currently, only MWD-002, MWD-006 and PVMW-014 contain non-
compliant concentrations of benzene.
Benzene concentrations do not appear to be migrating upwards in the water column
as evidenced from the sample results collected from monitoring wells MWD-002 and
PVSMW-002. PVSMW-002 (screened to 10 feet below ground surface (BGS)),
which is in close proximity to MWD-002 (screened to 27.5 feet BGS), continued to
display benzene concentrations below 2L GWQS.
New Hanover County Burn Pit; 94040_mon_rpt_0l.doc CA TL/ N E11gi11eers and Scientists
November 2003 CATLIN Project No. /94-040 6
I
I
I
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
8.0
7.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
CATLIN recommendations are based on a review of the current site conditions and
are as follows:
•
•
•
Continue with the monitoring and maintenance schedule outlined in the Final
Remedial Design Report.
Collect four quarters of monitoring data prior to making any pulse sparge system
adjustments or modifications.
Continue to evaluate DO measurement alternatives .
LIMITATIONS
The field and groundwater data evaluated as part of this monitoring report provide isolated
data points and may not represent conditions at every location in the project area. Analyses.
and conclusions of this report, being based on interpolation between data points at the project
area, may not be completely representative of all site conditions. Conclusions and
recommendations of this monitoring program and report are based on the best available data
in an effort to comply with current regulatory requirements.
New Hanover County Burn Pit; 94040_111011_rpt_Ol.doc CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2003 CATLIN Project No. 194-040 7
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLES
New Hanover County Burn Pit; 94040_mon_rpt_0l.doc
CATLIN Project No. /94-1140
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2003
- - -- - ---- - - -
I!!!!!!!! -=-a iiiiii -I!!!!!!! 11111111
TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA AND GROUNDWATER TABLE ELEVATiONS AS OF NOVEMBER 3, 2003
New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Superfund Site Page 1 of 2
,--,. . t'\ >p,_;.;.·. -~·, __ ,._:? :,._ .:.,.: _,. ,, -· "is ~,.~rr!~r~~: ~l~fil~b;t;it ~:~:-~~~-:;?&~-·. . .:-<~ f _:;,,:~. · DatecWater· ·,:•, } . .. :-, Date, · f~tti;,ii! 'Bottom,of: . . ~-l<"=J·-•.\• -· '8" ~C3sirig~t1· .c· 2~~11! It:,:; \':''-~-·--. :.o-•
:1r;,~1:'ll!d ~~~~~;·p~t; 1~'.lnteryaltJ. c~lWellr<:'':§J
;(ft;jBGsf1 ,·(m/dd/yy) _. 'ix•-t6:y>it'' BGS) <.,.3'.,g --..·. _,,. , ;{11]/dd'Y.Y);;, ,,(fl;.B_qS);, ;·};'.7J:~r;~ J;,~i'.~ ft,:~--1.~;.)·~~; -. '., ~ .,.~~ ,''A
MWD-001 1992 11/3/2003 17.5 17.5-27.5 27.5
MWD-002 1992 11/3/2003 17 17-27 27
PVSMW-002 5/28/02 11/3/2003 1 1-10 10
MWS-003. 1992 11/3/2003 5 5-15 15
MWS-004 1992 11/3/2003 5 5-15 15
MWD-005 1/4/00 11/3/2003 12 12-22 22
MWD-006 4/4/01 11/3/2003 14 14-24 24
CMW-007 1/4/01 11/3/2003 12 12-22 22
CMW-008 5/31/02 11/3/2003 3 3-23 23
CMW-009 5/30/02 11/3/2003 3 3-23 . 23
PVMW-010 5/30/02 11/3/2003 4 4-24 24
PVMW-011 5/30/02 11/3/2003 4 4-24 24
CMW-012 5/30/02 11/3/2003 3 3-23 23
NHC Airport Bumpit Superfund Site; /94040_mw const-water elev data
CATLIN Project No. 194-040
'.I~fiJ~f ' Dii th'ta~+;F;·;J,;'#'..~t'; ;;~ .. , _.P., .... :+:--1\k :Ffe8:Pi'odlfct -Water from ;-~--,. ,;;<. ---_;;; ,::!:.~7 ·,· ·,_~-•~•,--,-1,-•:a"-~-•~p t.Th1ckn·ess~~J
'-~~J~~~P.J· r~?i;trr?ic: ~;!.ff2i , <, e(ft )4•~~ '. :,,,: . .:.-\."~f"
33.51 3.77 0
33.27 3.69 0
33.46 4.08 0
33.34 4.24 0
32.31 3.34 0
32.21 2.85 0
32.06 3.45 0
33.16 3.78 0
34.27 4.67 0
33:22 3.42 0
32.78 2.87 0
33.43 1.19 0
32.85 2.63 0
·~·-·11~r ");,cf ·.,to.·:·.
);,_··;,·-~~-!,.-..-,._ z..,...;,a.';! -,. , . ~~rc,rounazr-: , )";;:. ,ikc•5s ,;;: .\~ . -~·--;-•)Iv: . ; :,4tt: .. water:__,;; ... { : :~! t],::~~,.1 -:£~1-·:c,..«c~~'l ""'1J'.., !Y·'., ~."i;'; E1~v!ti.o~J!!) "' '>.?fwt:f:jo:f~·:0\i lk ..
29.74
29.58
29.38
29.10
28.97
29.36
28.61
29.38
29.60
. 29.80
29.91
32.24
30.22
Performance Verification
Monitoring Well
Performance Verification
Monitoring Well
Performance Verification
Monitoring Well
Performance Verification
Monitoring-Well
Compliance Monitoring Well
Compliance Monitoring Well
Compliance Monitoring Well
Compliance Monitoring Well
Compliance Monitoring Well
Compliance Monitoring Well
Performance Verification
Monitoring Well
Performance Verification
Monitoring Well
Compliance Monitoring Well
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
October 2003
--- ------ - --- - -
I!!!!
TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA AND GROUNDWATER TABLE ELEVATIONS AS OF NOVEMBER 3, 2003
New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Superfund Site Page 2 of 2
CMW-013 5/30/02 11/3/2003 2 2-27 27 33.53 3.42 0 30.11 Compliance Monitoring Well
PVMW-014 5/28/02 11/3/2003 4 4-24 24 32.,16 3.18 0 28.98 Performance Verification
Monitoring Well
CMW-016 6/3/02 11/3/2003 3 3-23 23 32.53 3.40 0 29.13 Compliance Monitoring Well
P-1 1998 11/3/2003 0 0-7 7 32.41 5.29 0 27.12 Piezometer
P-2 1998 11/3/2003 0 0-8 8 31.55 2.60 0 28.95 Piezometer
T-13 12/22/98 11/3/2003 5 5-15 15 32.19 3.44 0 28.75 Compliance Monitoring Well
T-14 12/22/98 11/3/2003 5 5-15 15 33.10 4.48 0 28.62 Compliance Monitoring Well
T-15 12/22/98 11/3/2003 5 5-15 15 32.44 3.78 0 28.66 Compliance Monitoring Well
T-16 1/3/01 11/3/2003 17 17-27 27 32.39 3.62 0 28.77 Compliance Monitoring Well
* Reference point for top of casing elevation is based on Mean Sea Level
** If free product is present in a well, ground water elevation should be calculated by: [Top of Casing Elevation -Depth to Water]+ [free product thickness x __J
ft BGS = feet below ground surface
NHC Airport Bumpit Superfu11d Site; 194040_,nw co11st-water elev data
CATLIN Project No. 194-040
CATLIN E11gi11eers a11d Scientists
October 2003
lliiiliiil
m TABLE 2 HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER TABLE ELEVATIONS Page I of2
Date: November 3, 2003 . New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Supertund Site
n
n
m 6/11/2002 33.51 9.43 NMT 24.08
MWD-001 9/4/2003 33.51 · 4.39 NMT 29.12
11/3/2003 33.51 3.77 NMT 29.74
I 6/11/2002 33.27 9.21 NMT 24.06
· _MWD-002 9/4/2003 33.27 4.50 NMT 28.77
I 11/3/2003 33.27 3.69 NMT 29.58 .,
6/11/2002 33.46 9.52 NMT 23.94
I PVSMW-002 9/4/2003 33.46 5.17 NMT 28.29
11/3/2003 33.46 4.08 NMT 29.38
I 6/11/2002 33.34 9.36 NMT 23.98
MWS-003 9/4/2003 33.34 4.69 NMT 28.65
11/3/2003 33.34 4.24 NMT 29.10
I 6/11/2002 32.31 8.52 NMT 23.79
MWS-004 9/4/2003 32.31 3.27 NMT 29.04
I 11/3/2003 32.31 3.34 NMT 28.97
MWD-005 11/3/2003 32.21 2.85 NMT 29.36
I 6/11/2002 32.06 8.75 NMT 23.31
MWD-006 9/4/2003 32.06 3.50 NMT 28.56
I 11/3/2003 32.06 3.45 NMT 28.61
6/11/2002 33.16 9.64 NMT 23.52
I CMW-007 9/4/2003 33.16 3.66 NMT 29.50
11/3/2003 33.16 3.78 NMT 29.38
I 6/11/2002 34.27 10.51 NMT 23.76
CMW-008 9/4/2003 34.27 4.58 NMT 29.69
11/3/2003 34.27 4.67 NMT 29.60
I 6/11/2002 33.22 9.22 NMT 24.00
CMW-009 9/4/2003 33.22 3.25 NMT 29.97
•• 11/3/2003 33.22 3.42 NMT 29.80
6/11/2002 32.78 8.65 NMT 24.13
I PVMW-010 9/4/2003 32.78 3.25 NMT 29.53
11/3/2003 32.78 2.87 NMT 29.91
I
I NHC /Jurnpil; 194040_/iisl gw elev.xis CATLIN Engineers and Scielllists
CATLIN Project No .. 194-040 October 2003
I TABLE 2 HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER TABLE ELEVATIONS Page 2 of2
Date: November 3, 2003 New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Superiund Site
n • ,-
D
I 6/11/2002 33.43 9.37 NMT 24.06
PVMW-011 9/4/2003 33.43 4.49 NMT 28.94
11/3/2003 33.43 1.19 NMT 32.24
I 6/11/2002 32.85 8.92 NMT 23.93
CMW-012 9/4/2003 32.85 3.42 NMT 29.43
I 11/3/2003 32.85 2.63 NMT 30.22
6/11/2002 31.95 9.53 NMT 22.42
I CMW-013 9/4/2003 31.95 4.44 NMT 27.51
11/3/2003 33.53 3.42 NMT 30.11
I 6/11/2002 32.16 8.63 NMT 23.53
PVMW-014 9/4/2003 32.16 4.45 NMT _ 27.71
11/3/2003 32.16 3.18 NMT 28.98
I 6/11/2002 31.51 8.32 NMT 23.19 PVMW-015 9/4/2003 31.51 2.77 NMT 28.74
I 6/11/2002 32.53 8.90 NMT 23.63
CMW-016 9/4/2003 32.53 3.37 NMT 29.16
I 11/3/2003 32.53 3.40 NMT 29.13
P-1 11/3/2003 32.41 5.29 NMT 27.12
I P-2 11/3/2003 31.55 2.60 NMT 28.95
I T-13 11/3/2003 32.19 3.44 NMT 28.75
T-14 11/3/2003 _ 33.10 4.48 NMT 28.62
I T-15 11/3/2003 32.44 3.78 NMT 28.66
' I T-16 11/3/2003 32.39 3.62 NMT 2B.77
I · Top of casing elevation is refernced to mean sea level.
NMT. No Measurable Thickness
I
I
I NHC Bumpil; 194040_hisl gw elel'.xls CATLIN E11gi,zeers and Scielllisls
CA TUN Project No. /94-040 October 2003
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 3 Summary of Groundwater Quality Field Parameters (Dissolved Oxygen) Page 1 of2
Date: September 24, 2003 New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Superfund Site
MWD-001
MWD-002
PVSMW-002
MWS-003
MWS-004
MWD-005
MWD-006
CMW-007
CMW-008
CMW-009
Nf/C Bumpit; 194040_histfield meas.xis
CATLJN Project No. 194-040
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
9/24/2003
CATLIN YSI
RENTAL YSI
CATLIN YSI
RENTAL YSI
CATLIN YSI
RENTALYSI
CATLIN YSI
RENTAL YSI
CATLIN YSI
RENTAL YSI
CATLIN YSI ,
RENTAL YSI
CATLIN YSI
RENTAL YSI
CATLIN YSI
RENTAL YSI
CATLIN YSI
RENTAL YSI
CATLIN YSI
RENTAL YSI
4.87
4.78
1.85
1.46
1.34
1.70
0.07
0.76
NM
NM
5.51
4.78
1.49
7.01.
1.39
0.59
0.33
0.48
4.27
3.97
CA TLJ N Engineers and Scientists
October 2003
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
··•
I
I
I
Table 3 Summary of Groundwater Quality Field Parameters (Dissolved Oxygen)
Date: September 24, 2003 . New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Supertund Site
9/24/2003 CATLIN YSI
PVMW-10 9/24/2003 RENTAL YSI
9/24/2003 CATLIN YSI PVMW-11 9/24/2003 RENTAL YSI
9/24/2003 CATLIN YSI
CMW-012 9/24/2003 RENTAL YSI
9/24/2003 CATLIN YSI
CMW-013 9/24/2003. RENTAL YSI
9/24/2003 CATLIN YSI
PVM-014 9/24/2003 RENTAL YSI
·9/24/2003 CATLIN YSI
PVM-015 9/24/2003. RENTAL YSI
9/24/2003 CATLIN YSI
CMW-016 9/24/2003 RENTAL YSI
CATLIN YSI = YSI Model 650 with Model 600 XL Sande
RENTAL YSI = YSI 55 Dissolved Oxygen Meter
NM = Not Measured
Page 2 of2
0.93
0.94
1.44
0.90
2.38
2.32
0.53
0.72
0.16
0.77
6.74
0.95
1.97
4.37
Note: Dissolved Oxygen levels were measured on September 24, 2003 with a CATLIN water quality
instrument and a Dissolved Oxygen meter rented from Pine Environmental Services, Inc. due to erratic
. DO levels encountered on September 4, 2003 during the sampling event. ·
NHC B11rnpit; 194040_/iistfield meas.xis
CATLJN Project No. 194-040
CATLJN Engineers and Scientists
October 2003
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
,1
I
I
TABLE 4 · SUMMARY OF CURRENT GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS Page I of I
Date: September 2003 'New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Superfund Site
w z w N z w m
1
MWD-001 MWD-001 9/5/2003 <1
MWD-002 MWD-002 9/5/2003 !lr@il
PVSMW-002 PVSMW-002 9/4/2003 <1
MWS-003 MWS-003 · 9/4/2003 <1
MWS-004 MWS-004 9/4/2003 <1
MWD-006 MWD-006 9/4/2003 fii!1sB ", __ n.,,,,
CMW-007 CMW-007 9/5/2003 <1
CMW-008 CMW-008 9/5/2003 <1
.CMW-009 CMW-009 9/5/2003 <1
PVMW-010 PVMW-010 9/5/2003 <1
PVMW-011 PVMW-011 9/5/2003 <1
CMW-012 CMW-012 9/5/2003 <1
CMW-013 CMW-013 9/5/2003 <1
PVMW-014 PVMW-014 9/4/2003 msrQB Ii-.
PVMW-015 PVMW-015 9/4/2003 <1
CMW-016 CMW-016 9/5/2003 <1
All results in ug/L
Shaded areas indicate concentrations greater than the 2L GWQS.
< -Less than quantitation limits.
N/IC Bumpit; 194040_current GW results.xis
CATLIN Project No. 194-040
w z w
N z w w m z
..J w >-:) :c ..J
I-0 w I-
29 1,000
3.3 <1
14 <1
<1 <1
<1 <1
<1 <1
<1 <1
<1 . <1
<1 <1
<1 <1
<1 <1
<1 <1
<1 <1
<1 <1
<1. <1
<1 <1
<1 <1
Cl) w z w a: Cl) ..J >-Ww >< ~ !;: ..J <C 0 ..J
I-..J <C 0 ..J z
I-<C <C
530 Varies
<4 BQL
5 BQL
<4 BQL
<4 BQL
<4 BQL
<4 BQL
<4 BQL
<4 BQL
<4 BQL
<4 BQL
<4 BQL
<4 BQL
<4 BQL
<4 BQL
<4 BQL
<4 BQL
CA TUN Engineers and Scientists
October 2003
D
TABLE 5 · SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS Pagelo/4
m Date: September 2003 New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Supertund Site
ANALYTICAL METHOD: EPA Method 602'~
I w U)
z w
w z
N w
I z ..J w w w >-z m z >< w ..J w ..J
N >-:::> ci: z :c ..J I-
I w I-0 0 m w I-I-
1 29 1,000 530
I MWD-001 4/17/1991 a1'!'alffl 8.5J 2.0J,• 25.3J ?i:llll
MWD-001 5/7/1991 -~" 7.4 1.5J 29.1J
I MWD-001 11/19/1991 Hml 8.8 1.1J <0.5
MWD-001 7/7/1992 ~ 16 1.4J <0.5
MWD-001 MWD-001 12/9/1992 1m~!!li 9.~. 10 <0.5 <0.5
I MWD-001 6/8/1993 -1§~ 19 1.3J <0.5
MWD-001 10/5/1994 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
I MWD-001 6/11/2002 <0.5 6.0 <0.5 <1.5
MWD-001 9/5/2003 <1 3.3 <1 <4
I MWS-001 MWS-001 6/11/2002 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5 --. '
I MWD-002 4/17/1991 MO 34 14J 82J ~ ... ,,
MWD-002 5/7/1991 1-1~. 13J 82J
MWD-002 11/20/1991 lliliP 5.9J <0.5
I MWD-002 7/7/1992 li}l6 2.BJ <0.5
MWD-002 12/9/1992 lifili. 3.4J <0.5 . ,.,,. .
I MWD-002 6/8/1993 <0.5 2.0J
MWD-002 10/6/1994 9.4 35.9
MWD-002 6/22/1998 4.1 23.2
I MWD-002 ~ II,~ MWD-002 6/25/1998 2.5 27.4
MWD-002 7/9/1998 ~~ flt~ 238 115
I 7/16/2003 11r:t11t lf:-"'!!B MWD-002 t ~Tot .A ~Q=t! : 1.7 21.6
MWD-002 7/23/1998 ~l:fsoi.il] 26.9 2.1 20.8 ~ "'""'' -'
I MWD-002 7/30/1998 -~1~11 1.1 2.3 <1.5
MWD-002 1/16/2001 w•rlll 14.8 <0.5 17.8 \:3&&,, '
MWD-002 6/11/2002 ~f;11Ifsi'i 6.8 <0.5 4.8
I MWD-002 9/5/2003 ~4-. . .· ,,.,.. . >,,, 14 <1 <7
' I
I NHC Bumpit; /94040_historical CW.xis CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CATLIN Project No. 194-040 October 2003
D
TABLES SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS Page 2 of4
m Date: September 2003 · New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit s.uperfund Site
I w en z w w z
N w
I z ..J w w w > z CD z >< w ..J w ..J N > ::) < z :c ..J I-
I w I-0 0 CD w I-I-
1 29 1,000 530
I MWS-002 MWS-002 6/11/2002 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
I PVSMW-002 6/11/2002 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
PVSMW-002
PVSMW,002 9/4/2003 <1 <1 <1 <4
I MWS-003 4/17/1991 <0.5 <0.5 0.89J <1.5
MWS-003 5/7/1991 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.77J
I MWS-003 11/19/1991 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
MWS-003 7/7/1992 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
MWS-003 12/9/1992 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
I MWS-003
MWS-003 6/9/1993 <0:5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
MWS-003 10/5/1994 <5 <5 <5 <10 ·
I MWS-003 1/16/2001 lir~ 0.5 <0.5 2.4
MWS-003 6/11/2002 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
MWS-003 9/4/2003 <1 <1 <1 <4
I
MWS-004 4/17/1991 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
I MWS-004 5/7/1991 <0.5 <0:5 <0.5 <1.5 ..
MWS-004 7/7/1991 <0.5 <0.5 0.52J <1.5
I MWS-004 11/19/1991 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
MWS-004 12/9/1992 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5 MWS-004
MWS-004 '6/9/1993 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
I MWS-004 10/5/1994 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
MWS-004 1/16/2001 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
I MWS-004 6/11/2002 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
MWS-004 9/4/2003 <1 <1 <1 <4
.1 MWD-005 1/16/2001 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
MWD-005
MWD,005 6/11/2002 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5
I
I NHC BumpiL; 194040_historical Gll'.xls CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
CA TLJN Project No. 194-040 October 2003
D
TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS Page 3 o/4
I Date: September 2003 New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Supertund Site
I w (/)
z w w Z·
N w
I z ...
w w w > z .. Ill z >< w ... w ...
N > :::, < z J: ... I-
I w I-0 0 Ill w I-I-
1 29 1,000 530
I MWD-006 4/12/2001 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5.'• <1.5
•'
MWD-006 MWD-006 6/11/2002 ~tifftl <0.5 <0.5 3.8
I MWD-006 9/4/2003 ~ <1 <1 <4
CMW-007 6/11/2002 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
I CMW-007
CMW-007 9/5/2003 <1 <1 <1 <4
I CMW-008 6/11/2002 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
CMW-008
CMW-008 9/5/2003 <1 <1 <1 <4
I CMW-009 6/11/2002 <0.5 · <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
CMW-009
CMW-009 9/5/2003 <1 <1 <1 <4
I PVMW-010 6/11/2002 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
PVMW-010
PVMW-010 9/5/2003 <1 <1 <1 <4
I PVMW-011 6/11/2002 l!flfil!,m;il 2.7 <0.5 2.8
PVMW-011
I PVMW-011 9/5/2003 <1 <1 <1 <4
CMW-012 6/11/2002 <0.5 <0.5 · <0.5 <1.5 I CMW-012
CMW-012 9/5/2003 <1 <1 <1 <4
.1 CMW-013 6/11/2002 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.5
CMW-013
CMW-013 9/5/2003 <1 <1 <1 <4
I PVMW-014 6/11/2002 lf44:'4:ft'tlfl 1.6 <0.5 2.1
PVMW-014 ~,i-.,, "
PVMW-014 9/4/2003 ;·1\\' s'ro1i'i'i(i <1 <1 <4 ,.;., ., ... ,l+Jfr •
I
I
I NHC Bumpit; 194040_historical CW.xis CATLIN Engineers and Scie11tists
CATLIN Project No. 194-040 October 2003
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER LABORATORY RESULTS
Date: September 2003 · · New Hanover County Airport Burn Pit Superfund Site
ANALYTICAL METHOD: EPA Method 6:.:0;;:2 ____ ~--~---~--~
PVMW-015
CMW-016
All results in ug/L
J = Es~imated Value
.NA = Not Analyzed
NS = Not Sampled
PVMW-015
PVMW-015
CMW-016
CMW-016
w z w N z w m
1
6/11/2002
9/4/2003 <1
6/11/2002 <0.5
. 9/5/2003 <1
Shaded areas Indicate concentrations greater than the 2L GWQS.
, · < -Less than quantitation limits.
w (/)
z w
w z
N w z ..J
w w ► m z ><
..J w ..J
► :, < :c ..J I-
I-0 0 w I-

I
-
29 1,000 530
1.4 <0,5 2.1
<1 <1 <4
<0.5 <0.5 <1.5
<1 <1 <4
Page 4 of 4
NHC Burnpit; 194040_/Jistorical G\V.xls
CATLIN Project No. 194-040
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
October 2003
n
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIGURES
New 1/anover County Burn Pit; 94040_mon_rpt_0J.doc
CATLIN Project No. 194-040
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2003
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
*
GN
5'
89 MILS 1°39' -29MiCs
UTM GRID ANO 1970 MAGNETIC NORTH
DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET
EIGINEERSHdSCIENTISTS
lll.MNGTCtl,, NCRlH CAR<l.JNA
1000 0
SCALE 124 000
0
1000 ,coo 3000 ,ooo
=
0
CASTLE HAYNE, N.C.
SW/4 ROCKY POINT !5' QUADRANGLE
N34!5-W7752.517.5
1970
1l1UC
NEW HANOVER COUNTY AIRPORT
I MILE
5000 6000 7COO FEET
l KILOMETER
~)
QUADRANGLE LOCATION
GENERAL LOCATION BURN PIT SIJPERFIJNO Sil£
WILMINGTON, N.C. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE
.... "" 94040 ,."' OCT 2003 "-"" 1"=2000' """'"' HCS amm"' GRG
FIGURE
1
94040-SEPT m}-STA lUS-01
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I NO,
\ \\ \
\ \ \ \
\ \
' \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ \ \ \_
\ \ GlJ
\ \ i-:•
OCSCRIPTIOH
RrVISION"'
CWW--016 0
' ' ' ' \
""'"° IIRAIIN
0£0<El) -DA1£;
BY DATE
BY, .,.
BY, HCS
BY, ""'
"" RCC . .,._. 2003
~~ I
BIIILSC..n.WWWIWI& V
lallNCIO<N<RTHCARCLOA
PRO.ECT
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
AIRPORT BURN PIT SUPERFUND
SITE WILMINGTON, N,C.
80
1lTlE
0
CMW--007 (FORWERI.. Y T-17)
LEGEND
EXISTING DESCRIPTION
m>£ I Wfll
TYPC II WEU
TYPE Ill WELL
DPT PROBE
181
0
PERFORMANCE V£RIFJCATION MONITORING 'M:11..
COMPLIANCE MONTORINC WEl.l.
0 80
SCALE IN FEET
SITE MAP WITH CURRENT
MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS
I "'NU
"""
2
fl.!4040-NO~BER 20ro-02
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NOTES:
\
\
\ \ \ ' \
\
' 13
\
' \
\
iv
\ \
\
1. 1111S DRAWING WAS A[)APTED FROM EXISTING
EPA. DRAWINGS AND -'£RIAL WAPPING.
\ \
\
\
2. WEU. LOCATIONS AND ELEV"TIONS LOCATED BY STOCKS LAND SURVEYING, P.C. OAT£0 24 APRl. 2001.
CWW--016 0
\
'·
\ \
DESIGNED BY: --~•~.rw~--f--t--------------------------------J---4-----J DRAWN BY:--~"=~---
f--+-------------------------------1-----+---' CHEa<ED BY:--~"°'=---
NO DESCRIPTION
Re-VISIONS "'
APPROVED BY: ___ R\,·c_ __
OATE NOVEMBER 2003
~~,
am. u .... w,.,a
'MUINCTar(. NCRTH CARCl.lHA
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
AIRPORT BURN PIT SUPERFUND
SITE WILMINGTON, N.C.
Tffi£
\ \
\
\
'
0
CMW-007
(FORMERLY T-17)
LEGEND
EXISTING NEW DESCRIPTION
{ili TTPE l WELL
$ TYPE II WELL
(1, TYPE RI WEU.
m DPT PR08E
® PERF"ORMANC[ VERlflCA TION MONITORING WEll
0 COMPUANct: MONlTORING WEl.l
~ SP.&.RGE WELL WllH BOX
1£1 CONTROL VAL \IE BOX
80 0 80
SCALE IN FEET
SITE MAP WITH CURRENT PULSE
AIR SPARGE (PAS) LOCATIONS
I .,, "" 94040
""""
3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
'
NO.
\ ' \ ' \
"' OATE
=-BY, .,.
DRAWN BY,
<>£O<ED BY, ""'
APPRIMD .,, Rye
DATE; """"'""' 2003
~~ I
a acau ... a.eu■1a ./
--N(JffijCARWt,\
.....er
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
AIRPORT BURN PIT SUPERFUND
SITE WILMINGTON, N.C.
80
Tl1lE
i :1i Jo CWW--007 (FORMERI...Y T-17)
(29.38)
LEGEND
EXISTING
(1)
e
I)';
DESCRIPTION
TIP£ I Wlli
TYPE II WELL
TYPE Ill WELL
DPT PROBE Erl
®
0
( )
P£RFORMANCE V£RIF1CATION MONITORING WEll
COMPUANCE MONITORING WElL -GROUNDW-'TER TABLE ELEVATION IN FEET
GROUNDWATER now DIRECTION ---GROUNDWATER TABLE CONTOUR
0 80
'
SCALE IN FEET
SITE MAP WITH GROUNDWATER
TABLE CONTOURS AS OF
NOVEMBER 3, 2003
I .m HO. 940<40
""""
4
FI..E94040-NOVEMBER 20(0-04
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\ \, ·,
\ \ \ \ i \
\,,, \ \ \ \
\
I \
\ \ \, \\
WW0-006
\ (1.5) GJJ_1,.
\ I
\
\
\ ' \
'
' \
\
CMW-016
(<1) 0
PVMW-015@
(PVMW-7)
(<1}
\
\ \ \
\ \
\ ' \
'
\ ' \
\
\
3. "WELLS HIGHUGHTID IN RID INDICAlE LOCATIONS Cf'" NON COMPUANT
BENIDE CONCENTRA TJOHS
\
\
PVMW-01 ◄ (5)
DESIGNED BY: ___ W~JW~--
DRAWN BY: __ _JH""''----
CHEO<ED BY: MEW
l----1--------------------------------1----ae-----i APPROl.£D BY: Ree
1-,N~O-. +------------"D!'~SCR=~,P~TI~ON~---------------+-= _,y-,f-.O~A~TErl DATE: NOVEMBER 2003
R"VISIONS
BtlLLC ... &C.ENl&i&
llUINCTCH, NCRTH CARCl.lHA V
/ /
I
/
NEW HANOVER COUNTY
AIRPORT BURN PIT SUPERFUND
SITE WILMINGTON, N.C.
Tm£
0
CMW-007
(FORMERLY T-17)
(<1)
LEGEND
EXISTING OESCRIPTION
@ TYPE I WEll.
-:i, rrPE II WELL
;S TYPE Ill WELL
~ OPT PROBE
@ PERFORMANCE VERIFlCATION MONITORING WU!..
Q COMPI.JANC[ MONITORING WU1.
( ) BENZENE CONCENTRA TlONS IN µg/L
80 a 80
'
SCALE IN FEET
SITE MAP WITH
BENZENE CONCENTRATIONS AS OF
SEPTEMBER 5, 2003
I "'•• 94040
AGIJI<
5
I
1·
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
1·
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
LABO RA TORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS AND
CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTS
New Hanover County Burn Pit; 94040_mon_rpt_0l.doc
CATLIN Project No. 194-040
CATLIN Engineers and Scientists
November 2003
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
5500 Business Drive
Wilibington, North Carolina 28405
[phone]
Fax [phone]
FILE COPY
Mr. Bill Walsh November 5, 2003
Richard Catlin & Associates
P.O. Box 10279
Wilmington, NC 28404-0279
Report Number: G128-1195
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 1947040
RE: Revised report
Dear Mr. Walsh,
Enclosed are the results of the analytical services performed under the
referenced project. Copies of this report and supporting data will be retained
in our files for a period of five years in the event they are required for future
reference. Any samples submitted to our laboratory will be retained for a
maximum of thirty (30) days from the date of this report unless other
arrangements are requested.
If there are any questions about the report or the services performed during this
project, please call for assistance. We will be happy to answer any questions or
concerns which you may have.
Thank you for using Paradigm Analytical Labs for your analytical services.
We look forward to working with you again on any additional analytical needs
which you may have.
Sincerely,
p I Laboratories, Inc.
J. Patrick Weaver
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
I
·•
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602
Client Sample ID: MWD-006
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
Lab Sample ID: 80277
Lab Project ID: G128-1195
Analyte Result
ug/L
Benzene ·1.5
Chlorobenzene BOL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BOL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BQL
· 1,4-Dichlorobenzene BQL
Ethylbenzene BQL
Toluene BOL
m/p-Xylene BQL
. a-Xylene BOL
Surrogate Spike Recoveries
Trifluorotoluene
Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BOL = Below quantitation limit.
RL
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 9/4/03
Date Received: 9/8/03
Matrix: Water
Dilution
ug/L Factor
1.0 1
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0 1
2.0 1
Spike Spike
Added Result
40 40.9
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
Date
Analyzed
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
· 9/11/03
Percent
Recovery
102
Reviewed By:~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602
Client Sample ID: PVMW-015
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
Lab Sample ID: 80278
Lab Project ID: G128-1195
Analyte Result
ug/L
Benzene BQL
Chlorobenzene BQL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BQL
Ethylbenzene BQL
Toluene BQL
m/p-Xylene BQL
o-Xylene BQL
Surrogate Spike Recoveries
Trifluorotoluene
·comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BQL = Below quantitation limit.
RL
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 9/4/03
Date Received: 9/8/03
Matrix: Water
Dilution
ug/L Factor
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
Spike Spike
Added Result
40 40.8
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
Date.
Analyzed
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11 /03
9/11/03
9/11 /03
9/11/03
Percent
Recov_ery
102
Reviewed By: L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602
Client Sample ID: CMW-016
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
Lab Sample ID: 80279
Lab Project ID: G128-1195
Analyte Result
ug/L
Benzene BQL
Chlorobenzene BQL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BQL
Ethyl benzene BQL
Toluene BQL
m/p-Xylene BQL
o-Xylene BQL
Surrogate Spike Recoveries·
Trifiuorotoluene
Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BOL = Below quantitation limit.
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 9/4/03
· Date Received: 9/8/03
Matrix: Water
RL Dilution
ug/L Factor
· 1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
Spike Spike
Added Result
40 40.8
N.C. Certification #48 I S.C. Certification #99029
Date
Analyzed
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
· 9/11/03
Percent
Recovery
102
Reviewed By: k
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
·I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602
Client Sample ID: PVMW-014
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
Lab Sample ID: 80280
Lab Project ID: G128-1195
Analyte Result
ug/L
Benzene
Chlorobenzene BQL
.1,2-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BQL
Ethylbenzene BQL
Toluene BQL
m/p-Xylene BQL
o-Xylene BQL
Surrogate Spike Recoveries
Trifluorotoluene
-Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BQL = Below quantitation limit.
5.0
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 9/4/03
Date Received: 9/8/03
Matrix: Water
RL Dilution
ug/L Factor
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0
2.0
2.0 1
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
Spike Spike
Added Result
40 40.8
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
Date
· Analyzed
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
Percent
Recovery
102
Reviewed By: k..-
I
I
I
I
I
I .
I
I
I
I
I
I
·I
I
I
I
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Client Sample ID: MW5-003
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602 .
•\ ,f
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 9/4/03
Date Received: 9/8/03
Matrix: Water
Lab Sample ID: 80281
Lab Project ID: G128-1195
Analyte Result RL Dilution
ug/L ug/L Factor
Benzene BQL 1.0 1
Chlorobenzene BQL 1.0 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BQL 2.0
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BQL 2.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BQL 2.0
Ethylbenzene BQL 1.0
Toluene BQL 1.0
m/p-Xylene BQL 2.0 1
a-Xylene BQL 2.0 1
Surrogate Spike Recoveries Spike Spike
Added Result
Trifluorotoluene 40 40.9
Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BQL = Below quantitation limit.
N .C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
Date,
Analyzed
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
· 9/11/03
Percent
Recovery
102
Reviewed By:k
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602
Client Sample ID: MW5-004
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
· Lab Sample ID: 80282
LabProject ID: G128-1195
Analyte Result
ug/L
Benzene BQL
Chlorobenzene BQL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BOL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BQL
Ethylbenzene BQL
Toluene BQL
m/p-Xylene BOL
o-Xylene BQL
Surrogate Spike Recoveries
Trifluorotoluene
Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BQL = Below quantitation limit.
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 9/4/03
Date Received: 9/8/03.
Matrix: Water
RL Dilution
· ug/L Factor
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0
2.0 1
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0
2.0
Spike Spike
Added Result
40 41.0
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
Date
Analyzed
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11 /03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
· 9/11/03
Percent
Recovery
103
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602
Client Sample ID: PVSMW-002 ,il
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
. Lab Sample ID: 80283
Lab Project ID: G128-1195
Analyte Result
ug/L
Benzene BQL ·
Chlorobenzene BQL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BQL
Ethylbenzene BQL
Toluene BQL
m/p-Xylene BQL
a-Xylene BQL
Surrogate Spike Recoveries
Trifluorotoluene
Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BQL = Below quantitation limit.
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 9/4/03
· Date Received: 9/8/03
Matrix: Water
RL Dilution
ug/L Factor
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
1.0
1.0
2.0 1
2.0
Spike Spike
Added Result
40 40.9
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
Date
Analyzed
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
Percent
Recovery
102
Reviewed By: k-
I
I
.I
I
I
•••
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602
Client Sample ID: MWD-002
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
Lab Sample ID: 80284
Lab Project ID: G128-1195
Analyte Result
ug/L
Benzene 47
Chlorobenzene BQL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BOL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BOL
1.4-Dichlorobenzene BQL
Ethylbenzene 14
Toluene BOL
m/p-Xylene BQL
o-Xylene 5.0
Surrogate Spike Recoveries ·
Trifluorotoluene
Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BQL = Below quantitation limit.
RL
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 9/5/03
Date Received: 9/8/03
Matrix: Water
Dilution
ug/L Factor
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0 1
-2.0 1
2.0 .1
Spike Spike
Added Result
40 41.3
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
Date
Analyzed
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11 /03
9/11/03
9/11/03
· 9/11/03
Percent
Recovery
103
Reviewed By: b.._
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602
Client Sample ID: CMW-013
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
Lab Sample ID: 80285
Lab Project ID: G 128-1195
Analyte Result
ug/L
Benzene BQL
Chlorobenzene BQL
1.2-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene BQL
Ethylbenzene BQL
Toluene BQL
m/p-Xylene BQL
a-Xylene BQL
Surrogate Spike Recoveries
Trifluorototuene
Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BQL = Below quantitation limit.
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 9/5/03
Date Received: 9/8/03
Matrix: Water
RL Dilution
ug/L Factor ·
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0
2.0 1
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0 1
Spike Spike
Added Result
40 40.8
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
Date
Analyzed
9/11/03.
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
Percent
Recovery
102
Reviewed By:~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORiES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602
Client Sample ID: PVMW-011
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
Lab Sample ID: 80286
Lab Project ID: G128-1195
Analyte Result
ug/L
Benzene BQL
Chlorobenzene BQL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BQL
Ethylbenzene BQL
Toluene BQL
m/p-Xylene BQL
o-Xylene BQL
Surrogate Spike Recoveries
Trifluorotoluene
Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BQL = Below quantitation limit.
RL
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 9/5/03
Date Received: 9/8/03
Matrix: Water
Dilution
ug/L Factor
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
Spike Spike
Added Result
40 41.0
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
Date
Analyzed
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
Percent
Recovery
102
Reviewed By: k
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Client Sample ID: CMW-012
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602
,.,
.. ~ Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 9/5/03
· Date Received: 9/8/03
Matrix: Water
Lab Sample ID: 80287
Lab Project ID: G128-1195
Analyte Result RL Dilution
ug/L ug/L Factor
Benzene BQL 1.0 1
Chlorobenzene BQL 1.0 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BOL 2.0 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BQL 2.0 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BQL 2.0
Ethylbenzene BQL 1.0
Toluene BQL 1.0 1
m/p-Xylene BQL 2.0 1
a-Xylene BQL 2.0 1
Surrogate Spike Recoveries Spike Spike
Added Result
Trifiuorotoluene 40 41.1 ·
Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BQL = Below quantitation limit.
N.C. Certification #48 I S.C. Certification #99029
Date
·Analyzed
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
Percent
Recovery
103
Reviewed Byk
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602
Client Sample ID: PVMW-010
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
Lab Sample ID: 80288
· Lab Project ID: G128-1195
Analyte Result
ug/L
Benzene BQL
Chlorobenzene BQL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BOL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BQL
Ethylbenzene BQL
Toluene BOL
m/p-Xylene BQL
. o-Xylerie BQL
Surrogate Spike Recoveries
Trifluorotoluene
. Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BQL = Below quantitation limit.
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 9/5/03
· Date Received: 9/8/03
Malrix: Water
RL Dilution
ug/L Factor
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
Spike Spike
Added Result
40 41.0
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
Date.
Analyzed
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
· 9/12/03
Percent
Recovery
103
Reviewed By:~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
'
I I
I
I
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602 .
Client Sample ID: CMW-009 )l
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
Lab Sample ID: 80289
Lab Project ID: G128-1195
A~alyte Result
ug/L
Benzene BQL
Chlorobenzene BQL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BQL
Ethylbenzene BQL
·Toluene BQL
m/p-Xylene BQL
a-Xylene BQL
Surrogate Spike Recoveries
Trifluorotoluene
Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BQL = Below quantitation limit.
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collecled: 9/5/03
· Date Received: 9/8/03 ·
Matrix: Water
RL DIiution
ug/L Factor
1.0
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0
Spike Spike
Added Result
40 41.1
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
Date
Analyzed
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12103
9/12/03
9/12/03
Percent
Recovery
103
Reviewed By:~
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602
. Client Sample ID: MWD-001
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
· Lab Sample ID: 80290
Lab.Project ID: G128-1195
Analyte Result
ug/L
Benzene BQL
Chlorobenzene BQL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene BQL
. 1 .4-Dichlorobenzene BQL
Ethylbenzene 3.3
Toluene BQL
m/p-Xylene BQL
o-Xylene BQL
Surrogate Spike Recoveries ·
Trifluorotoluene
Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BQL = Below quantitation limit.
RL
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 9/5/03
Date Received: 9/8/03
Matrix: Water
Dilution
· ug/L Factor
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0 1
2.0
2.0
Spike Spike
Added Result
40 41.2
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
Date
Analyzed
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
Percent"
Recovery
103
Reviewed By: k
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602
· Client Sample ID: CMW-007
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
Lab Sample ID: 80291
Lab Project ID: G128-1195
Analyte Result
ug/L
Benzene BQL
Chlorobenzene BQL
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BQL
Ethylbenzene BQL
Toluene BOL
m/p-Xylene BQL
o-Xylene BQL
Surrogate Spike Recoveries
Trifluorotoluene
Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BQL = Below quantitation limit.
RL
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 9/5/03
Date Received: 9/8/03
Matrix: Water
Dilution
ug/L Factor
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
1.0 1
1.0 1
.2.0 1
2.0 1
Spike Spike
Added Result
40 40.9
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
Date
Analyzed
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
Percent
Recovery
102
Reviewed By: l
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602
Client Sample ID: CMW-008 \\
;('
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
Lab Sample ID: 80292
Lab Project ID: G128-1195
Analyte Result
ug/L
Benzene BQL
Chlorobenzene BQL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BOL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BQL
Ethylbenzene BOL
Toluene BQL
m/p-Xylene BOL
o-Xylene BQL
Surrogate Spike Recoveries
Trifluorotoluene
Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BQL = Below quantitation limit.
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected: 9/5/03
· Date Received: 9/8/03
Matrix: Water
RL Dllutlori
· ug/L Factor.
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
Spike Spike
Added Result
40 41.0
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
Date
Analyzed
9/12/03 .
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
9/12/03
.. 9/12/03
Percent
Recovery
102
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Results for Labortory Control Spike (LCS)
by GC602
Client Sample ID: Analyst: JTF
Date Collected: Client Project ID: OMS #20.
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
1,2-Dlchlorobenzene
1,3-Dlchlorobenzene
1,4-Dlchlorobenzene
Elhylbenzene
Toluene
m/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Lab Sample ID: LCS3091103
Lab Project ID: G185-163
Date Received:
Date Analyzed: 08115/03
Comments:
Flags:
Spiked LCS
10 96.1
10 96.6
20 102.0.
10 101.5
20 102.1
10 96.5
10 96.5
20 97.8
20 98.8
Concentration values are on column amount.
Concentration units are ug/L
* :;; Out of limits.
NA = Not applicable
Matrix: Water
Limits
Lower Upper
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
7.0 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
70 130
Reviewed By: ~
N.C. Certification #4ITT89"s1c. Certification #99029
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
~esults for MS/MSD
' by GC 602
Client Sample ID: Balch QC Analyzed By: JTF
Dale Collecled: 08108/03
Date Received: 08109/03
Matrix: Water
Client Projecl ID: NHC Bumpil 194-040
Lab Sample ID: 80261
Lab Projecl ID: G128·1195
Date Analyzed: 09111/03
Sample Spiked
ug/L ug/L
Benzene BOL 10.0
Chlorobenzene BOL 10.0
1,2-0lchlor9benzene BOL 20.0
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BOL 10.0· .
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BOL 20.0
Ethylbenzene BOL 10.0
Toluene BOL 10.0
mlp-Xylene BOL 20.0
a-Xylene BOL 20.0
Comments:
Limits
MS MSD Lower Upper
% % 'I, 'I,
94.9 97.6 55.0 145.0
102.9 97.9· 34.6 165.4
97.3 .. 94.4 21.6 178.4
99.2 95.3 20.9 179.1
99.9 96.2 27.9 172.1
95.7 95.1 42.9 157.1
95.5 97.5 · 50.4 149.6
97.1 94.7 43.0 157.0
100.0 97.4 ·63.1 136.9
Concentratiorls are on column values and corrected for dilution.
Flags:
• ::: Out of limits.
NA = Not applicable
BOL = Below quantitation limit.
Reviewed By: k
N.C. Certification #4'r!Je 1§.X::. Certification #99029
Limit
RPO Max.
% %
2.8 30
5.0 30
3.0 30
4.0 30
3.8 30
0.6 30
2.0 30
2.5 30
2.7 30
I
I
I
I
I
:I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
byGC 602
Client Sample ID: Method Blank
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
Lab Sample ID: VBLK3091003b
· Lab Project ID: G128-1195
Analyte Result
ug/l
Benzene BQL
Chlorobenzene BQL
1. ,2-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1 .4-Dichlorobenzene BQL
Ethylbenzene BQL
Toluene BQL
m/p-Xylene BQL
o-Xylene BQL
Surrogate Spike Recoveries
Trlfluorotoluene
Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BQL = Below quantitation limit.
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected:
· Date Received:
Matrix: Water
RL Dilution
ug/L Factor
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
2.0
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
Spike Spike
Added Result
40 40.9
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
Date
Analyzed
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
Percent
Recovery
102
Reviewed By:~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Results for Volatiles
by GC 602
Client Sample ID: Me_thod Blank .•~
Client Project ID: NHC Burnpit 194-040
Lab Sample ID: VBLK3091103
Lab Project ID: G128-1195
Analyte Result
ug/L
Benzene BQL
Chlorobenzene BQL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BQL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BQL
Ethylbenzene BQL
Toluene BQL
mlp-Xylene BQL
o-Xylene BQL
Surrogate Spike Recoveries
Trifluorotoluene
Comments:
All values corrected for dilution.
BQL = Below quantitation limit.
Analyzed By: DCS
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Matrix: Water
RL Dilution
ug/L Factor
1.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
2.0 1
1.0
1.0
2.0
2.0 1
Spike Spike
Added Result
40 40.9
N.C. Certification #481 S.C. Certification #99029
Date.
Analyzed
9/11/03
9111103
9111103
9111/03
9/11/03 .
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
9/11/03
Percent
Recovery
102
Reviewed By: L
- - -·-- - - - - - - - - - - -,RADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
00 Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 Chain-of Custody Record & Analytical Request
,one: (910)-350-1903 FAX: [phone]
ient: C.,..-r._."' l-1 Ht. iu~tJPTf
Project ID: 194 -(!>4¢
ldress: ZZ-t, c><..-z-"i>M."-1 ~
)dress: 1,.,\1.M\~~,-,, }Jc z 84'1>5
tote#:
Contact: 'fi1C4c,,, UAJtc«?f
Sample ID Date Time Matrix
<DS~f'(I)-llld> 'vJ
:p!;:E:Y(l)3 1145 w
?>5~3 12.z..S w
IZ:6"S=I'~~ IL\ 1-S w
. lv\W" <l>O\ 1 l'~J 1:45 w
1>G~ l34ri \,J .
Phone: ya-inrc;1
Fax:
Preservatives
,:) 0
_J fc-J u
cC ~ .r 0. "1
'/.. 'I-
'I. -1..
~ X
I.. i
y. )(
x X
'
Date: ______ _
Turnaround: S"tf'lt,11)1\1<:t>
Job Number: ______ _
P.O Number:
Analvses
> -
· COC.# 33945
Page Z. of z_
Report To: -& ...... w"'._~ ..
Invoice To: <: 47Lut
Comments:
.; Please specify any special reporting
requirements
SEE REVERSE FOR
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
-. - - - - - - --· - -. - - - -~RAD I GM ANALYTICAL LABORATORIFS, INC.
;oo Business Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405 Chain-of Custody Record & Analytical Request
; .,.~~ . .
COC# 33944
Page_\_ of 1-10ne: (910)-350-1903 FAX: [phone]
ient: LATLI t4 •
!dress: Z 2e 0....\) t>MR ll tlo &O
ldress, ,.,.,L""'~"r,l,)I..IL Z~
~ote#:
WJb -sz,cp" ~S~3 12.1 t,
~MW -q>\5 rzA~&r,,, 3 1315'
t.\W-0lt. DI\S6'9>3 14¢7
v,,,,w-014-t>'\sel'~3 11\55'
IWS-ct,<l) 3 D'\'SE.'Q>3 l'5~~
~ 'vJ "S -(Z)Q) 4 :z>,\sti'f13 11.q:>5
vs"" -.J -<P 0 t-~~3 1,32
\\JJD-(1)(!>2 <t>S~i;. ~,q,
~MIIJ• (1) 13 -_ __.r ,3 ~4'5
'1/ t,AW· <l) I\ ZlS'SEWJ3 1¢2.5
wl-lt vRWP\T
ProjectlD:. !j4-g,4(,
w
w
w
w
w
Contact: P.\U. '°'I\RiE:n:
.Phone:. 452;'.~\
• Fax:
)(. )(
X )(
)( I-
X )(.
)( )(.
'w -.L. )(
w ~ ,<.
\,/ .x X
w x x
w )< 'I-
. Date: ________ .· Report To: . lhU. t..1Q\5ti
Turnaround: STIU>1t>\QS)
Job Number:, _______ _
P.O. Number:_, ______ _ . Invoice To: ('Kn.uJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIXB
BENZENE CONCENTRATION VS. TIME GRAPHS
New Hanover County Burn Pit; 94040_111011_rpt_0l.doc
CATLIN Project No. 194-040
CATLIN E11gineers and Scientists
November 2003
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
120
100
80
::, -a,
2-
C 0 :;:: .. ~ -60 C (I) u C 0 u
40
20
0
Benzene Concentrations vs. Time
New Hanover County Airport Burnpit Superfund Site
Date NOTE: Only wells exhibiting Benzene
concentrations above the 2L GWQS are shown.