NCD986175644_19980728_Davis Park Road TCE Site_SERB HRS_HRS Document Package for NPL Proposal-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4
ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
100 ALABAMA STREET, S.W.
JUL 2 4 1998 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-3104
Mr. Jack Butler
North Carolina Division Waste Managment
North Carolina Department of Environmental, I and Natural Resources
P . O . Box 2 9 6 0 3 \
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
SUBJ: . 1 .I . . . Nationa Priorities List
I Proposed Rule #25
Final Rule #21
Dear Mr. Butler:
JUL 2 71998
SUPfRFu NDSECTtoN
The Agency announced on July 27,. 1998, in the Federal
Register, Proposed Rule #25 and Final Rule #21 to the National
Priorities List· (NPL) -I This rule proposes to add 14 sites, to
finalize 9 sites and to de-propose 1 site to the NPL. Region 4
sites are as follows:
Proposed Rule #25:
1. . ' Davis Park Road TOE, Gastonia, North Carolina
Final Rule #21:
1.
2 .
Camilla Wood Preserving Company, Camilla, Georgia . ' . Solitron Microwave, Port Salerno, Florida
De-Proposed:
1. Monarch
Enclosed
rule. If you
404/562-8817.
Tile, Florence, Alabama
. \ b k d . 1 .. are various ac groun materia s pertaining
' . have any questions, please contact me at
Sincerely,
to the
Cy~~G::~YC,Lv1lwr
Enclosures
cc: Ms. Pat DeRosa
Region 4, NPL Coordinator
Site Assessment Process Owner
Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (40% Postconsumet)
I
&EPA
·•-•1@ij
I
I • -

•

, • • -'". • ' •• NATIO~AL PRIC>RITII;$ UST(NPL) . _ -July 1998 -Ef fuWill®ii,t■Rl!Ael --Ml l I l-idiih@Frii·Jifl@11
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE
Gastonia, North Carolina
lhe Davis Park Road TCE site (DPR) is locatbd on Davis Park Road between Hudson Boulevard and Dogwood Avenue I -west of the City of Gastonia within the Gastonia Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) area. The site is designated by
l ont~!]i\ted -"'._~!Is at thre~_p_rjvate residences rnd a subdivision that have:been-impacted by a contaminated·groundwater-
lume. The site can be found on the Gastonia South, North Carolina USGS 7.5' Quadrangle Map at latitude 35 13' 56" N and 81 13' 08" W. 1
1 -l -I -March of 1990 during routine sampling of the community well at the Cedar Oak Park Subdivisio11, and aga,iu.in April
-
. 990, high levels of trichloroethylene (TCE) iind tetrachloroethylene (PCE)were detected in the ground water. During
ollow-up sampling by the Gaston County HJaltli Department (GCH), three other private residential wells were also ound to be contaminated. The North CarolinJ Division of Environmental Management performed extensive sampling rf the private wells in tl!e vicinity of the site fiom ivlay 1990 to August 1992. ·
Most of the domestic water supplies, industrial supplies, and several municipal supplies•in Gaston County are obtained wom wells. Dug wells, usually found in older, \rural areas, derive their water from the saprolite, which is the weathered Ind disintegrated zone between the soil and the unweathered bedrock. Drilled wells, used for higher yields for industry and municipal use, obtain their water from eith~r granite or schist formations .. According to the former hydrogeologist fr the Gaston County Health Department, the saprolite and the fractured bedrock act as a single hydrologicunit.
During subsequent investigations by the North <i::arolina Superfund Section, efforts were made to locate the source of the lont~nated ground water plume,_however no fonclusive evidence, neither historical documentation nor environmental lilamplmg, has been able to deternune the source. · ·
I
lnze description of the site ( release) is based oh information available at the time the site was ·scored. The descrip-. ~on may change as additional information is gbthered on the sources and extent of contamina?ron. See 56 FR 5600,
'ebruary n, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.JI! _ · -._
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I HRS DOCUMENTATION RECORD--REVIEW COVER SHEET
I
Name of Site: Davis Park Road TCE I
Contact Persons I U.S. EPA, Region IV: Cynthia Gurley [phone]
Site Investigation: Harry Zinn [phone]
Documentation Record: Harry Zinn [phone]
Pathways, comwneots. or Threats Not Evaluated
Only the Groundwater Pathway was evaluated for this site. The surface water
pathway was not evaluated based on the low toxicity/mobility/bioaccumulation
values of the contaminants and the distance to the surface water Probable
Point of Entry. The soil.exposure pathway was not evaluated based on the
apparent lack of targets. The air pathway was not evaluated based on the
low nWTiber of targets in the area.
/ ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HRS DOCUMENTATION RECOi
Name of Site: Davis Park Road TCE
EPA Region:IV Date Prepared:07/17/97
Street Address of Site: Davis Park Road
County and State: Gaston, North carolina I
General Location in the State: Southcentral North Carolina
h . 1 ' I. . . h' Topograp ic Map: U.S. Geo ogical Survey 7.5-rrunute series topograp ic
quadrangle map for Gastonia sluth, _North Carolina, 1993
. ( scale 1: 24,000) _ I _ ·
Lati~ude:35° 13' 54.0" Longitude:081° 13' 08.0" I
I
Scores
Air Pathway
Ground Water Pathway
Soil Exposure Pathway Surface water Pathway
HRS SITE SCORE
1
NA
67.0
NA
NA
33.5
/
DST
I, "
\ (---
~;!)) ---~
pc -+.
\ " ·;;,,
10
.. ,' '• ' . , -J;\s._
./ •1 \
/ \ '
( "/~)\()
r--,. r .. r/ ~v' > . -'-./
,-1<
l
' " . ' /,: ;;:,,. ~~J 11□__11 , ~~ , -y--c_ -~ • - ' --,J
,J s l 110,,,,., ,. . '
•
., \ _,, ~ ,.___.,.. I
' < ,v /1
'
\~ is:
I ·1 ' -,
/C -•11\\._,.
\t, ,.,,\'-' -.J \, f'._,
\·1,i:"'''' ' _) ' I '1t { _\'.... I 11
.__..,,"~•Jc/11)~~:.: 1 \,
'
• • . " '~ ' ,; , ,i,u
)
',
DEPA
'-,1 y \,~~\ r.,v, i ' i
-~l ).._; Li r-..._ ',
1 _, Ir ~,(/i'-<J ' --"'h•~~~/ ( ' 1 ,\1 ,,.--."¾J(i ;,,,\ ,, rs> ' -~~ .~ , rl ., I •-· ' ''•>ll;~,c, 0-,i :,( • ' ~ \'-. -~ \I'
,, u,1_~-r"-.-'
ST
MSN
E OF
rl 'J , i! , I' • '·o: (/lS,:p). -, I? j" 1 t \/'1( " -"' \_,
"' /,'1/ .........
' '
(,1 \ '-"<)·!' ~'jc\/i J l'.\';\Z, --;:
, •s~-~?1 , · '.; t i
,
-'
\ ' " ~ \ I 'I . :·~'iti',:'l:"~l1 ' 1/1 , ]I\ __ ~ m,
OR
,,
HC
" ' '
1
' ,
, ..
1les
f I I o, 1/ -7 I
, ) I' A1 (~-~ i Q \ "'".'.c!.\: / a r,w1 ::-(' ' .,, ,, :):\)(~9) '. cc~ I ' )' "'',\.._ -."-'•'• \
(.1 r,,,;':,0.,1,)> r 1' ~-P~ <'0: ~ / i[S \ I .',,>,1;/, ', --, '~.:,, r~~-~t~;...', ,; >.:: '•!i<t.\'\.,--/ r( 1r ✓~....I ~ r y../(l...._-:1__S -~ '>.l~ ---~~
I) \".._.,'(\ 1/ '~) /~> ~ r'---..,,-;:::--;: \ ' ' ~~ -"'~~:::.,-~
11 '.J1"r., ;vc , /, c, ,;::t' c o,.) ~\... --~ cf -:::::,.._y /4 __>t::-7:l 1' ,-7 !
I '( :!/ ,_ r; :i1 ;:. ( »~{~ ),.._,, \ !\'\ I
' V I ._ ,
'68 I OOC> F'E:ET (ti CI •u • 20' «Ji; '71 -,.-11..!U r, ".
yrnted States eolog1ca! Sur\Jey
l arammetnc methods from imagery d~led 1971
rumotl927( 2)
~a·ol1n coordmdt~ system
I come)
No-+,1 Carohr ~ oor IQate s~t
-~1,1ate syste, , north zone
versal Tranov~r5e Me1~ator tlcks,,wne 17
''"
101-M•[~\\I !'
I 3 'It.~
v,,(, ••• ,
ALE 1 ,. 000
1RESOU
31 unkt1n P,o L Tf}
20 -Yon-:wood S/0 '<
;3 -Oa~Je Paril 112 v ~
~nlairtbrook SID
_9 -Mountain Villa~~ lHP
htld's WoMd
<south Lane s10
2 -Ba~er Acrns
~o Fa1r'.ax S/D
49 -m~ Acres
47 allsctest II S/0
, 3 -arl: Place
4 -Ramtree SID
~ • Lamar Acres
6~'-ltckory Creek SID
bl -Cha I Grove !::lorn
57 -Chaoel Acre$ MHP
Sch
17. C:tar1land Commnl u
5 -Shad Res! MH Communit
• ,\tan Acre~
ilS. Solith Forest SID
':i,f:y;1;:;;;;;fone SID
7 • Suburban MHP ,
c;JG'si1ewood SI
~ti. w,r ,c.-wood Acres SID
'.c-,> • l\'~p ',lC/M\ F/0 •
S'J D&M Reilals
'"
11tJrn 1983 (NAD 83! 1s thcwn b)/ dashed
,,,,~ cl_iii,t.sl.u•t 1,, tw ~n N'1Qj_7 ;md NALL
rn M p[ 'v!P,iES ·ml T Nr ~(',PAC\' IB
_S E 13YJJ.~_Q _ i,lr,1~ "J
/qOCi(YI I'll , , , (!
1.IN<;:01.N I~• 0
,~ 515~'•• C " ,. ; 1~ ,, '"
A l/V i -' .~;;&=••r,. , .. ,·"!c'"''7"f.'ic~r'i
\
-;,,~,'CC,"":"';''·~~_.,..~.-•~-.,-,~}.,(,="':,-~a-~-c-'4-,'-~~~===~~-----~~---~~-------
P11n,~1y h1i;t1v,aay
~ d s~,
54l,ond"~ ~,gh.,,1
'
A
I
l" ·~---"-a-?=-:.?...:}o~ -:._Y?
~1,t ,.__1.-r; ~ 1' •\1r '\" ~ ~_,.",;:\..__/ , ~ ,!
t,T
r HE I NTEP JOR
R
{ ,•, .
,.
d
',
•
,'
' ' " '
'
''
{ i
' '"' ' ' . \ . : _;.,.~.. ~ ;
1.,)!t,t'.;~i, ,~ad, nM
""Y'li<r<I ,urlaCt " ~d'ky p~ulu,;r nine\
a:Jo'( cd l 9rJ.
th /;tr ~, ,,,, 0Jtu•n o l 27 ll'Wi i;
• • • • • • • aje<:11\~1 rt! C ,,rn11,,a coorQ n;11~ i lokom
'
an'\Nt! conl m,1', Q'll(;\ d'1, R f ' J ~l \ICH ~ Nor•~ Carolina Cl)O!i,o,'4!1 ,·t~h .... ,
011111 "'◊Ima ( u 1w>l<' ,ystem ,.,.u, Jr~
Jue lCOOmeler Urw•Josa' Tra•,~~!i,, i.-re•' ell
NC-'c ,' , 01 1 JI.Ji,enca11 D,1>cw1 QI 1 <l83 IW.V !I \l, ®"'' t d~ ct
:im~r 1ic•1 l m, ~,•lu~t of the :.!l-l\ iwt~ Ml) .'} a11d WI.' sa
1 '1W 'lll'~f,;,•~,on~<>Ot~'MJ"'" "•~'ii\ .-;\ 1~:~,, ,, ~;\' ' ' "I ,., ',t , " ,\ jl\<''}~({' ~ I • ' I" I l
l
l
... , .. ,
'
M~•)\'-0 )¼% <b>;"'-"'ltl
DC,i~T ~',t ![:J, ,,
A
DE A. T
OFN TH Ci\ROt j
)
N
AND
Al,i
OF _NV R
TCR L
\.J 1ENT1 HE
ESOU CES
,f-r , N('IHH CA'IO
LT l
:,
\ ',~~,1
),,,,""'_· ~-~---· '
'
' ' I i
'\~' {;l?~ji;\*.
"" '(; .. ''" \, ;,,i,';1 •.11 i ' •1 ,f-1> "..,, 'l'ih"'i. '', jt< 1 ' ',,, ... , ,, ,, ''" ' .a, •. ,, j
',fi; '"''_,j, ,
.. , _, .C:::1 r·
CC•N-1
M l )" L e<CL
> OIJPL 5
FOR lF.
81'NIL_ER S O ilR
.. ', . ~, : '. •:
I d' , "'i~ ~\ <> • ' ,:,~,:, ,,e t J,':,"'"' if_! \'' ''r ., e1} 1 -· ' ~-~"i ,,.•i'""\1
'
1 ')20
"' ____,,_::,__r_QN Vl,1 _NI/', 22092
• l';;.~DJr'=, r,,.~ o ( . ~n 21,
'
• "-, ... '-/; ;u c«, uc" " , ,,
Re,1,1~ns ,,n , ::c•pe cornµ,1~<;1 I!' wou, ,~;, "'h
'.·J 1~a 1,c 1n(.c(:/C~i1~-, <./, "•, ~--1~~
Or, r a/Y h1 '1 , ,
" re •1,.r/,r
S J,1rvl"•gl1c
h ird ~u , cc~ _.,_ _
, (;,lt..~f~!¾¥i '"#:,'lit'' ,
,' 11::w ' • tG , ,· ' .,
,,
• I I
i; 1
:;:' /
~ ·"
' ' ' I
,,
..
1
'
-' .. -
_,,..
.. ' ,
.----
-
· .. , .
• ,, ·~ r
'\. -i':;
•·'.=. ·-i-.. ·.
-ec:-~•
WI( VP 0 ·--~[!.. :1 . ~1-,__-L.._,.L _J 0
_)
'
\. ' I •.
<. ,;'-,., _.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.. ,
1.
2a.
2b.
2c.
3.
4.
5.
6.
I
WORKSHEET FOR COMPUTING HRS SITE SCORE
I .
I
' Ground Water Migration Pathway Score (Sgw)
(from Table 3-1, lline 13)
!
Surface Water OVerland/Flciod Migration Component
(from Table 4-1, l!ine 30) ·
d. I f . . . Groun Water to Sur ace Water Migration Component
(from Table 4-25, lline 28) .
Surface Water Migration Pathway Score (S...,)
Enter the larger of lines 2a and 2b as the pathway I
Soil Exposure Pattiway Score (S,)
(from Table 5-1, lline 22)
I Air Migration Pathway Score (S.)
(from Table 6-1, lline 12)
Total of
!
I s 2 +s 2 I+
gw "' I
I
HRS Site Score Dilvide the value on line 5
by ;4 and take the square root
4
s S'
67.0 4489.0
Not Evaluated
Not Evaluated
Not Evaluated
score.
Not Evaluated
Not Evaluated
4489.0
33.5
D
D
R
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site Name: Davis'Park Road,TCE
Location: Gastonia, NorthiCarolini
NCD 986 175 6441
I
GROUND WATER MIGRATION PATHWAY SCORESHEET
I
' FACTOR CATEGORIES AND FA:CTORS
I
1.
2.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8,
9.
10.
lL
Likelihood of Release to an Aquifer
Observed Release
Potential to Release
2a. Containment
2b. Net Precipitation
2c. Depth to Aquifer
2d.
2e.
Travel Time
Potential to Release I
[lines 2a x (2b + 2c + 2d)]
I
Likelihood of Release (higher of lines 1 and 2e) '
I
Waste Characteristics
Toxicity/Mobility
Hazardous Waste Quantity
Waste Characteristics
Targets
Nearest Well
Population ! .
Ba. Level I Concentrations
8b.
Be.
8d:
Level II Concentrations 1
Potential Contamination I
I
Population (lines 8a + Bbl + 8c)
Resources· I
Wellhead Protection Area
Targets (lines 7 + 8d + 9 + 10)
I
Ground Water Migration Score for an Aquifer •
12. Aquifer Score
[(lines 3 x 6 x 11)/82,500]'
Ground Water Migration Pathwa~ Score
!
' 13. Pathway Score (Sgw), (highest val~e
from line 12 for all aquifers evaluated)' ' I
'
• M ' I I' . . .1 axi.mum va uc app 1cs to waste charactcnshcs category.
b Maximum value not applicable. • I · · ·
c Do not round to nearest integer.
I
I
I
Maximum Value
4a
550
10
10
5
35
500
550
a
a
100
50
b
b
b
b
5
20
b
100
100
Value Assigned
550
100
100
50
780
175
955
550
10
1005
67
67
D
R
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Reference
Nwnber
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
REFERENCES
. '
I
DescriptioA of the Reference
• I 1 · Rank' U.S. Environmenta Protection Agency Hazard. ing System; 40
CFR Part 300, Appendix A, 55 FR 51532, December 14, 1990.
u. s. Envir~nrnental Protection Agency Superfund Chemical Data Matrix (SCDM), June 1996.
'
Latitude ar\.d Longitude Coordinate Worksheets from Guidance for
Performing I Preliminary Assessments under CEROA u. s. EPA
Publication 9345.0-0lA September 1991 Appendix E
Zinn, ~-Superfund Section, NC DEHNR, Memorandum to file,
Subject: Field Notes from Sampling Trip on January 25, 1994 .
January 27 •[ 1994 3 pages.
Zinn, Harry. Superfund Section, NC DEHNR, Field Log for ESI
Sampling Trip on January 25, 1994. ·7 pages
John E. MaJthews, Handbook of Bioremediation Ada, Oklahoma 1
page (Pg. 2'06) .
I
Zinn, H~. Superfund Section, NC DEHNR, Memorandum to file,
Subject: Private Well Data for Davis Park Road TCE Site May 11, 1994. 1 page
' I f d ' d f'l Zinn, Harry. Super un Section, NC DEHNR, Memoran urn to i e,
Subject: Groundwater Population for Davis Park Road TCE Site.
July 15; 1997. 7 pages
. ' . I Stanley, Jeanette. Superfund Section, NC DEHNR, Memorandum to
file, Subject: Update on Status of Wellhead Protection Programs
in N.C. January 2, 1996. 1 page I . .
LeGrand H; E., Geology and Ground water in the Charlotte Area. North Carolina, N.C. Department of Conservation and Development,.
Bulletin No1• 63 1952 11. pages (pgs 47-57)
Zinn, Harry[. Superfund Section, NC DEHNR, Memorandum to file,
Subject: Hydrogeology of Gastonia Area, Davis Park Road TCE Site.
December 23 ( 1993. 1 page ·
Zinn, Harl{, Superfund. Section, NC DEHNR,
Inspection, May 1994
I
I
5
Expanded Sjte
I
u
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SD-Characterization and Containment
I SOURCE DESCRIPTION
2.2 Source Character~zation
I
I
Number of the source : 11
Name and description of the source: Contaminated Ground Water Plume with No
Identified Sources (source type other)
I
No identified smlrce for the contamination at this site has been
located, either through historical documentation, observation, or sarrpling.
The contaminated plume was first detected during routine sarrpling of the
Cedar Oak Park Subdivision ccxmrunity well in March of 1990 (Reference
12,p.4). Subsequent sarrpling by the Gaston County Health Department
identified three additional private wells that were contaminated (Reference
12,p.4). These start !topographically upgradient at the Corella residence
(DP-003) and continue downgradient past the May residence (DP-004) and the
Thompkins residence (DP-005) to the Cedar Oak Park Subdivision (DP-
006) (Figure 2) . I
Note: On Figure 2 the CO-## indicates a sarrpling label previously
attached to! that well.
Tacation of the source with reference to a map of ttie site: The contaminated 9X"Oundwater plume is located west of South Gastonia in Gaston
County,_NC (Figure 1) ·[ It extends from the Corella re~idence at 2403 Davis Park Drive (References 14,p.2; 5,pp.3,4,7; 7; 12,Appendix,p.12) to the Cedar
Oak Subdivision (References 4,p.2; 5,pp.4,7; 7; 12,Appendix,p.15) located
approximately nine hundred feet to the southsoutheast (Figure 2).
I
Containment · i
I Release to ground water
I . An observed release to 1the groundwater has been documented by.the detection
of contaminants in the groundwater (References 4,p.2; 5,pp.3,4,6,7;
12,Appendix,pp.12,13,14,15). Since the source is a groundwater plume that
is constantly migrating throughout the aquifer, and therefore is not
contained, a containment factor of 10 is assigned ..
I
I Value: 10
6
D
H
R
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 2.4.1 Hazardous substances
I Background Concen~ration
Sample ID DP-001-PW
DP-002-PW
.Pe!,2th
70 feet I
I unkn,:,wn
I
I
lla.t.e.
01/25/94
01/25/97
SD-Hazardous Substances
Source No. : 1
Reference 4,p.2; 5,p.5
7; 12,Appendix,p.10
4,p.2; 5,p.5
7; 12,Appendix,p.ll
DP-001-PW is a groundJ.ter sample collected from the well of Mr. Godwin at
2231 Davis Park Road. iThis well is located topographically upgradient from
the site (Fig. 2) and was fonnerly labeled as C0-12 (Reference 12, Table 2-
1). I
DP-002-PW is a groundwater sample collected from the well of Mrs. Pauline
Philbeck at 2301 Davis Park Road. This well is located t,:,pographically
upgradient from the s~te (Fig. 2) and was fonnerly named Billy Frank and
labeled C0-7 (Reference 12, Table 2-1).
I
SamplEl .m DP-001-PW
DP-002-PW
Hazardous
Substance PCE
TCE
PCE·
TCE
I
I
I
Concentration
ND
ND
ND
ND
I Note: PCE; tetrachloroethylene
TCE; trichloroethylene
I Contaminated Samples
Sample ID DP-003-PW
I
Pe1llil Not Known
I
Sample
Quantitation
Limit. 10 ug/1
10 ug/1
10 ug/1
10 ug/1
lla.t.e.
1/25/94
Reference 12,Appendix,p.10
12,Appendix,p. ll .
Reference 4,p.2; 5,pp.3,4,7;
7; 12,Appendix,p.12
DP-003-PW is a groundwater sample collected from the well of Mrs. Corella at
2403 Davis Park Road. I
I
DP-004-PW I 187 ~eet
I
1/25/94 4,p.2; 5,pp.6,7;
7; 12,Appendix,p.13
I DP-004-PW is a groundwater sample collected from the well of Mr. Charles May
at 2419 Davis Park Road! .This well was fonnerly labeled C0-1 (Reference 12,
Table 2-1) I
I
DP-005-PW Not Known
f
1/25/94 4 ,p.3; 5,pp.6, 7;
12,Appendix,p.14
DP-005-PW is a groundwater sample collected from the well of Mr. Thompkins
at 2425 Davis Park Road. This well was fonnerly named Russell Graves and
labeled C0-6 (Reference! 12, Table 2-1).
I
DR-006-PW 150 Feet 1/25/94 4,p.2; 5,pp.4,7;
7; 12,Appendix,p.15
DP-006-PW is a groundwater sample collected from the well at the Cedar oak
Subdivision. DP-106-PW is a duplicate of sample DP-006-PW.
7
I
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
I
Note: The historical data listed in Reference 12, Table 2-1 are C'?'3.1!?iled
from private, county and state samplers and laboratories. The qualifier K
indicates the quantity is less than that shown and trace indicates the
quantity is less thari the Instnunent Detection Limit. All water sample
units are ug/1 and all soil sample units are mg/kg.
Sample
lD. .. DP-003-PW
DP-004-PW
DP-005-PW
DP-006-PW
Note: PCE
TCE
I
' I Hazardous'
substance TCE
TCE
TCE
PCE
TCE
Concentration
10 ug/1
38 ug/1
11 ug/1
18 ug/1
51 ug/1
I = tetrachloroethylene
trichloroethylene
I
8
Sample
Quantitation
Limi.t 10 ug/1
10 ug/1 · 10 ug/1
10 ug/1
10 ug/1
Reference 12,Appendix,p.12
12,Appendi.x,p.13
12,Appendix,p.14
12,Appendix,p.15
I
u
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
'
SD-Hazardous Constituent Quantity
Source No. : 1
2.4.2. Hazardous waste Quantity
I
I • 2.4.2.1.1. Hazardous 1eonst1tuent Quantity
• I
No information on hazardous constituent · quantity for the contaminated
groundwater plwne was !available.
2.4.2.1.2. Hazardous :wastestrearn Quantity
I
No information on ha'zardous wastestream quantity for the contaminated
groundwater plwne was 'available.
2.4.2.1.3. volume
The contaminated groundwater plwne extends from the Corella well at 2403
Davis Park Drive to the Cedar Oak Subdivision well approximately nine
hundred feet away inl a southsoutheasterly direction (Figure 2) . The
contaminated wells lie roughly in a straight line, therefore, no volwne of
the contaminated plume1was·calculated. The volume is unknown, but >0.
I Volwne of source (ft'): unknown, but >0
I
2.4.2.1.4. ~ I
I No area has been delin~ated
Area Assigned Value:
I I 2.4.2.1.5. Source Hazardous
' i
' I
I
References 4,pp.2,3; 5,pp.3,4,6,7
7; 12,Appendix,pp.12,13,14,15
for the contaminated groundwater plwne.
>0SD-Source Hazardous Waste Quantity Value >0
waste Quantity value
Source Hazardous Waste Quantity Value: >0
Reference(s): 1, Table 2-5
9
g
D
R
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Source
NQ....
1
I
I SITE SUMMllRY OF SOURCE DESCRIPTIONS
I
I Source Hazardous
Waste Quantity
:laJ.J.!e. I
Ground
~
10
Sum of Values: >0
10
Containment
Surface
~
NA
Gas.
NA
SD-Sumnary
Air
Particulate
NA
I
u
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GW-General
. I
3 • 0 GROUND WATER MIGRATION PATHWAY
I 3.0.1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
'
1\i;n,lifer/Strattnn 1 (smillowest)
I
Aquifer/Stratum Name: lsaprolite/Bedrock .
Description: DavJs Park Road TCE located in Gastonia, Gaston County, is
in the rolling uplandlportion of the Piedmont province. Mica schist forms the dominant rock into which granite was injected in Gaston County, however,
the site is located in a belt of homogeneous or nearly homogeneous granite
which extends northwara from the basin of South Crowders·ereek at the South
Carolina line, through Gastonia to Lincoln County, east of High Shoals
(Reference 10,p.47). I . · .
Large quantitieslof water are contained below the land surface in the openings and interstices in the rocks. The interstices in the
unconsolidated sedimentary rocks, such as gravel, sand, and clay, are
primary interstices consisting of pores or openings between the sand or clay
particles. Crystalline rocks have little primary pore space between the. ·
compound grains. The important interstices in these rocks are the joints,
fractures, ·cleavage planes, planes of schistosity, bedding planes, and
solution channels. Most of the domestic water supplies in Gaston County are
obtained by wells. Dug wells, usually found in older, rural areas, derive
their water from the saprolite, which is the weathered and disintegrated
zone between the soil and the unweathered bedrock. Drilled wells, used for
higher yields for industry and municipal use, obtain their water from the
fractures in the granite or schist formations (Reference 10,pp.49,50).
According to Mr. Marki Durway; the former hydrogeologist for the Gaston
County Health Department, the saprolite and the bedrock. act as a single
hydrological unit in this area and are referred to as the Saprolite/Bedrock
aquifer (Reference 11) ! ·
I All of the sarrpl'es collected prior to and during the Expanded Site
Inspection were collected from private and corrmunity wells. orily three of
the wells sarrpled for the Expanded Site Inspection have data available on
. well construction.· The Godwin well at 2231 Davis Park Road serves 2 people
and is approximately 70: feet deep. The Corella well at 2403 Davis Park Road
serves 3 people but has no well construction data available. The Charles
May well at 2419 Davis Park Road serves 4 people and is 187 feet dee{'.• The
Tompkins well serves 2 !people but has no well construction data available.
Finally, the Cedar oaks Subdivision corrmunity weli located on the south end
of the subdivision is connected to 26 hook-ups and the well is approximately
150 feet deep .. No data is available on depth to bedrock or depth to the
water table. I ·
.References: 4,pp.1-3; s,pp.l-7; 10,pp.47,49,51; 11
'
I I
I
'
11
'·•~·· _-? ... -.,
i
I
n
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.1 LIKELIHOOD OF RELEASE
I 3 .1.1 OBSERVED llEI,El\SE
Aquifer Being EvaluatJd, Saprolite/Bedrock
Chemical Analysis, \
I Background Concentration
I Depth Sample ID
DP-001-PW I 70 feet I
GW-Obsenred Release
Date Reference 1-25-94
DP-001-PW is a groundwkter sample collected from the well of Mr. Godwin at
2231 Davis Park Road. •
1
This well is located topographically upgradient from the site (Fig. 1).
Sample
4,p.2; 5,p.5
7; 12,Appendix,p.10
Sample ID DP-001-PW
Note;
Hazardous
Substance
PCE ·1 TCE
Concentration
ND
ND
PCE
TCE
I tetrachloroethylene
trichloroethylene
Chemical Analysis: I
I
Contaminated
Sample ID
DP-003-PW
DP~004-PW
DP-005-PW
DR-006-PW
' Samples
I Depth.
Not Known
187 Feet
Not Known
150 Feet
Quantitation
Limit Reference 10 ug/1
10 ug/1
12,Appendix,p.10
Date Reference 1/25/94 4,p.2; 5,pp.3,4,7;
7; 12,Appendix,p.12
1/25/94 4,p.2; 5,J?P.6,7;
7; 12,Appendix,p.13
1/25/94 4,p.3; 5,~p.6,7;
12,Appendix,p.14
1/25/94. 4,p.2; 5,~p.4,7;
7; 12,Appendix,p.15
The above samples were!collected from three private wells and a cormrunity
well which have been sh.own by past sampling events to be contaminated with
PCE and TCE (Ref. 12, ~able 2-1).
Sample ID
DP-003-PW
DP-004-PW
DP-005-PW
DP-006-PW
Note:
I
Hazardousl
Substance: concentration TCE I 10 ug/1
TCE 1 38 ug/1
TCE I 11 ug/1
PCE ,
1
18 ug/1
TCE 51 11g/l
I PCE; tetrachloroethylene
TCE; trichloroethylene
I
12
Sample
Quantitation
Limit · Reference · 10 ug/1 12,Appendix,p.12
10 ug/1 12,Appendix,p.13
10 ug/1 12,Appendix,p.14
10 ug/1 12,Appendix,p.15
10 ug/1
I
H
D
R
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-Level I Samples I
Hazardous substance Hazardous Subs. Concentratlon SaJJl21e ID·
DP-003-PW
DP-004-PW
DP-005-PW
DP-006-PW
Reference for
Note:
TCE I ~ I
PCE
TCE I
I
10 ug/1
38 ug/1
11 ug/1
18 ug/1
51 ug/1
Benchmarks: 2,pp.b-60,b-61
I I
PCE = tetrachloroethylene
TCE = trichloroethylene
I .
I
Attribution: 1
Benchmark
Concentration
5ug/l, 7.7ug/l
5ug/l, 7.7ug/l
5ug/l, 7.7ug/l
5ug/l, l.6ug/l
5ug/l, 7.7ug/l
Benchmark
MCL, CRSC
MCL, CRSC
MCL, CRSC
MCL, CRSC
MCL, CRSC
No specific source (s) !that may have released hazardous substances to the
groundwater has been identified. These private wells are contaminated with
TCE and the farthest downgradient well, the coornunity well, has a high level
of TCE and a low levellof PCE in it (Ref. 12,Appendix,pp.12-15; Figure 2).
The site is the contaminated groundwater plume that has impacted these
wells. I . .
Hazardous Substances Released
PCE (tetrachloroethylene)
TCE (trichloroethylene) . . I
' I
I
I
• I
' I
I
' I ' ======================================================================= I Ground Water Observed Release Factor Value: 550
13
I
H
D
R
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GW-Potential to Release
3.1.2 Potential to Release
The criteria Jonstituting an observed release by chemical analysis
has been met. Therefore, the potential to release component of this pathway
was not evaluated. I
! .
I
. I
I
. I
14
I
n
D
D
R
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3,2
3.2.1
I WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
I Toxicity/Mobil1ty
I
Hazardous
substance
I Source Toxicity
No I Factor value Mobility
Factor Value PCE
TCE
Note:
1 I 100
1
I
I
10
1
1
PCE ~etrachloroethylene
TCE ~ trichloroethylene
GW-Toxicity/Mobility
Toxicity/
Mobility Ref,
100 l,pp.51601-2
2,p.B-18
10 1,pp.51601-1
2,p.B-19
Toxicity/Mobility Factor Value: 100
15
I
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.2.2 Hazardous
source Number
1
I
I • waste onant1ty
I . Source Hazardous
Waste Quantity
Vahle (Section 2
>0 I
I
i Sum of Values: >0
4 2 1, 51
GW-Hazardous waste Quantity
Is source hazardous
constituent quantity data complete? (yes/nol no
Hazardous Waste Quantity Value ; 100 based on Level I target
concentrations(Ref. l,p.51592)
I
3.2.3 waste Characteristics Factor Category value
I
I Hazardous Waste Quantity Factor Value (Ref. 1, Table 2-6): 100
I
I Toxicity/Mobility Factor Value: 100
Toxicity/Mobility Factor Value X Hazardous Waste Quantity Factor Value:
. · : 100 X 100 ; 10, 000
I
Applied to Ref. 1, Table 2-7 .yields a Waste Characteristic Factor Category
Value: 10 I
I ===============================================================-=--=-=----
1
'
I
Hazardous waste Quantity Factor Value: 100
Waste Characteristics Factor category Value: 10
16
I
D
R
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GW-Targets
3 • 3 TARGETS ~
Only six wells 1
1
were sampled during the January 15, 1994 sampling
event. All of the wells had six inch casings and do not appeared to be dug
wells. I .
The background well (DP-001-PW) is located at the Godwin residence at
2231 Davis Park Road. I The well is located approximately 400 feet northwest
of the Corella well (Fig. 2) and is estimated to serve two people. The next
well (DP-002-PW) is located at the Philbeck residence at 2301 Davis Park
Road. This well is located 225 feet northwest of the Corella well (Fig. 2)
and serves one personl(Ref. 5,p.7). Note that in the logbook (Ref. 5) the
Corella well sample should be DP-003-PW not DP-002-PW as shown. The third
well (DP-003-PW) is l'ocated at the Corella residence at 2403 Davis Park
Road. This well is the northern most contaminated ·well which makes up the
contaminated groundwater plume (Fi;,. 2) and serves three people (Ref.
5,p .. 7). The forth well (DP-004-PW) is located at the Charles May residence
at 2419 Davis Park Road. This well is located 175 feet southeast of the
Corella well (Fig. 2) 'and serves four people (Ref. 5,p.7). The fifth well
(DP-005-PW) is located at the Tompkins residence at 2425 Davis Park Road.
This ~ell is located 250 feet southeast of the Corella well (Fig. 2) and
serves two people (Ref. 5,p.7). The sixth well (DP-006-PW) is located at
the Cedar Oaks Subdivision. This well is located 900 feet southeast of the
Corella well (Fig. 2) .i
Well
DP-001-PW
DP-002-PW
DP-003-PW
DP-004-PW
DP-005-PW
DP-006-PW
Note: S/B
I
Distance I
From Source
o. 076 mi. I 0. 043 mi.
0.0 mi.
0.0 mi.
0.0 mi.
0.0 mi.
Level
·s/B
S/B
S/B
S/B
S/B
I Level
Contam.
{Y/Nl
N
N y
y
y
y
Saprolite/Bedrock aquifer
I
I
17
II Potential
Contam. Contam.
{Y/Nl {YIN}
N y
N y
N N
N N
N N
N N
Ref 12,Appendix,p. 10
12 Appendix,p. 11
12,Appendix,p. 12
12,Appendix,p. 13
12,Appendix,p. 14
12,Appendix,p. 15
I
D
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GW-Nearest Well
3.3.1 Nearest Well
Well: 1 ,
Level of Contamination (I, II, or potential): I
I
The nearest Level I cohtaminated well (Ref. 12,Appendix,p.12) is located at
the Corella residence l(DP-003-PW) at 2403 Davis Park Road. This well is the
north most well in the series of contaminated wells which make up the
contaminated groundwater plume (Fig. 2). . I
I
' ' I
.,
I
-----------------------=---------=----=--=--==--=---=--==---=--=~=~==-==-= ! Nearest Well Factor Value: SO
'
I
18
I
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GW-Level I Concentrations
3.3.2 Population
I
321 Le 1 fc I •• 3. . .ye oontam1nat1on
3.3.2.2 Level r concJntrations
Level r Well I Population Reference
1 DP-003-PW 3 5,p. 7
2 DP-004-PW 4 5,p. 7
3 DP-005-PW 2 5,p. 7
4 DP-006-PW 69 7; 8
The _PC>pulation served\ by the · Cedar Oaks Subdivision was calculated by
multiplying the . number of hook-ups (26) to the system (Ref. 7) by the
pcJ?ulation density of 12. 64 peog;:/house for Gaston County (Ref. 8, p. 2) .
This yields 69 people on the Ce Oaks system.
I
I
I
I
I ========================================================================== Population Served by I
Level I Wells:78 \ Level I Concentrations Factor Value: 780
19
I
R
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GW-Level II Concentrations
1 I . 3.3.2.3 Leve II concentrations
Level II Well I Population Reference
.1 .I. b d' fh d 1 No Leve II contamination was o serve in any o t e groun water samp es
collected (Ref. 12,Appendix,pp. lQ-20).
I
I
I
I
I
I
I =====================================================================-==== : Level II Concentrations Factor Value: 0 I
20
I
H
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.3.2.4
Distance
category
Potential
0 -1/4 mi.
1/4 -1/2 mi.
1/2 - 1 mi.
1 - 2 mi.
2-3mi.
3 - 4 mi.
GW-Potential Contamination
I
I • • Contam1nat1on
, Distance-Weighted
PQPulation Reference PQP11Jation Value
290 B 164
68 B 33
362 B i67
1654 8 294
5395 B 678
4828 B 417 I Sum of Distance-Weighted Population Values: 1753
The population figures for each Target Distance Limit (TDL) were derived by
the following process!. First, the conmunity wells listed by the North
carolina Public Water Supply Section were located on Figure 1 and the houses
associated with these wells were allocated to them. For the o-.25 mile TDL,
Figure 2 was used for this purpose. Next, the area served by Gaston County
Water System was delineated on Figure 1. For those parcels of land which
are depicted as urbanl areas and do not show individual houses, the area
within each TDL was planimetered and the area multiplied by the 1990 U.S.
Census figure of 315.13 people/sq. mi. for South Gastonia (Ref. B,p.1).
Finally, those houses! not allocated in any of the previous steps were
counted and multiplied by the 1990 U.S. Census figure of 2.64 people/house (Ref. 8,p.2). ' .. •
Reference 8,pp.1-7
I
' =======================================================;==.================= Potential Contamination Factor Value: 175
21
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GW-Resources
3.3.3 RP.SOURCES
No Resource use of the groundwater has been identified.
========================================================================== Resources Factor Value: 0
22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GW-Wellhead Protection Area
3 . 3 . 4 WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA
No Well Head Protection Program cu=ently is in place in North Carolina
(Ref. 9).
====================== ·=================================================== Wellhead Protection Area Factor Value: O
23
I
-E = .. +: ... -:---
= =
Reference 1
Davis Park Road
NCD 986.175644
Friday
December 14, 1990
TCE
I Reference 2
Davis Park Road TCE .· ·! .. , .... ·,'.j,..;:,.;,J'·j NCD 986 17 5 6'44. ( '; \;,t, ;;,>i_':,Ji,(t,:i;~fl
I ~ • -·-' •. f.,e:::,,').:. ~•-_j
. 'l
I
I . .:;:.
I
I
I
I SUPERFUND CHEMICAL DATA MATRIX /
I
I
I
I
' .
I i,
I
I .. . t.,:·f:,:,\~~-•~:.~"ti~:f~·-r/:.· . . ·'. 1 . . . . '. ~ -~::;·:~~ :, •·1:1;,·;~~; •. t..-t~ ::1-.-~t:~ .. ;;~~ ,,if ,;;Wit r._, ... , __ ;·y ' :.;. r·•~J:' .-~--t~i-·-~~.r ..
,_ •. • June 1994
I :.'· ... '_;.""?:~ .. '.-,: • . . I' ~--l'ri~f: ~:---:·,.:;tIJ~ ''.;:,; i;~_j'.'. ; ,,. i/r.~-:· ·'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Reference 3
Davis Park Rqad TCE
NCD 986 175 644
:~;;,;:,:;;, _;;·~·;\?'J?::C:1~::;,\:i.:ii~~'{/Nfs ~~~~EfN~u:~J:~~~~l~~ ·ti}'tisHii;•-,2 · :~: .-.--~ · --',-;--·':)~~
.CERcqs -~-: NCO . 'I lH,-rlf.~'{'-( .·,_,.,;-,,.
· ss'tD: _ .. ; · ... :. --1'· • ;;.!.· t./;~ k:)'.: ·t·f;·•:.:-· ,; ; -.:_-:~::?/.1.;
==-----------------,------
.. />.DURESS: DA<tl) th-~k j<J. ' V
STATE: NL ZIP CODE: ----------------
SITE REFERENCE POINT: ______________________________ _
uses QUM HAP NAME: G-A,-ro,.,e kif NC. TOWNSHIP: N/S RANGE: __ . E/W
SCALE: 1 :-24, 000 HAP_.DATE: SECTION: __ 1/4 __ 1/4
!-\AP DATUH: ciiu) 1983 (CIRCLE ONE) MERIDIAN: -----------------
·cooROINATES FROM LOWER ·RIGHT ( SOUTHEAST)' CORNER OF ·7 -·S '. ,HAP-( attach •_ph.otoc_opy) :_ _,_.
LONGITUDE: ~o _QJ_• 30 " LATITUDE: 7,5"' .o ~• _ .)0 :"
COORDINATES FROM LOWER RiGHT ( s·ouTHEAST) CORNER oF 2. s · GRID CELL:
LONGITUDE: SI o \'l.. LATITUDE: 31' 0 lL . 30 ..
CALC,ULATIONS: LATITUDE ( 7. 5' QUADRANGLE MAP)
_,i'._'.'. t.~-~:.t,r.11{:P.\;~{'..!;},.,_'./r-,;~~ .... ):_, __ .,;1.,J".:·,·: _ ... /,,)··.-;•'-1:..,,r:·.·.',;,+-;.~ .. ~·-:;_:1,·. ·•: ..._.:
.. A)' NUMBER OF,~RULER GRADU-1\TIONS' FRoi-i' LATITUDE GRID' 'i.rnE TO i
· .--.:~ ,,;. , B) •,Hui:riiJ':y:. ( it, ,:BY· 0. 3 304.· TO_,',CON\TERT ;To_-;;ECONDS:-• -,., ,_,.,.-.;.;;;;:,;. ,.-,,r-.•-! ""1~1'" ''ti,${.,-_,,-· •'<!°''"'
· __ . ·. _~-;. ., .. ·_. -~-· ·, • · • -.•,~:~ .. _ ;•_ · . . ---_~ .. ·: .. · -.-.. • , · ': ,-~.·: · tic',. -~:r.~ ,."· ·.:;--1' :l1\:/.~Y:,; .. ~;z~~~-~:~~1ii1;!i:~;l:!i•~;~~;~~4f.f:_::~t~~:~:EtS\::·,.\:~:l;:{~'
.,. ,,, -•!-,-A .. x,.0.3304 -.~.~ ... _. . · -. ._ -.... · _ .. .
. , • '•'·)••• .. --,, ; •. •<<" •-i~,;," • .•.••<':' .~:. , . . .,d ~• .• '• :~ -:--;:-•• -.;_r~ •~ 7:. f ~;;'~l,;-•.•'t_ ~,;) ' .. '>:_~•,0!Jf:17/--:.i~~~~\ii~~j;•: .. ::~~~1§; .:,_~" ~:t~'-~~
SITE REF POINT: ?-;.5 '1; ·--
C) EXPRESS IN MINUTES AND SECONDS_ (l'= 60"): _l_··•:.rr._j__!:._" : : · .
I c;\~~•.: ;:~: ~~,;;;,(¥~0: ,.,:, )ill ti!'T°6f~ TART iii~ iLATI TUD i:"; i,:,i-1 S";.io_,>1 t'l!•).,~'?,o-.'i-•O ). -~ ;. +i{\i.liJ.,;~Ji'.-1 f:t,:OJ,c; l\,=:.~,1-t.;q,i<,, ~C'. -~ '"-.
• " · ·-•: --------· T-·-. -.-.-----.. ·.·----,-_.,_.;.-,_.,..~, .. ~~ ,t1,-',--, '<:".""'i::;I'~
I SITE LATITUDE: ..1L_o_li_•~-~•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .. -,
I
I
I
I
I
s ITE. NA.HE, ,. I) l'\1115:-·P~,t(l--aol'\G TC£ -'NUKBER..: IVCO. :_,rr{, ! 'ii. i'it; ,,,;•~:t). ->:. ·;
00
);.-.,:.-• ,_. ·.,.:,, ••• • .,.,.--... --.-," ,_,_.,,.,,_.,,,,,.., ""'" -,-· w,,· _ , ... ,_.,,,.,; .• .,.,·,,•:;• · '•·•·· •.m .,, "
1Q_ ."JI,
:: ..
-:"-•• ...
'
MEMO
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
January 27, 1994
File
. Harry
North
Field
Davis
Gastonia, Gaston
NCD 986 175 644
Reference 4
Davis Park Road TCE
NCD 986 175 644
County, .North Carolina
'.
On January 25, 1994 Bob Gandley, NC Superfurid Section, and I
went to the Davis Park Road Site to sample soils on-site and the
surrounding private wells to determine if ·contaminat~on:. ·had
occurred and to wr3.t extent it may have migrated off-site. We
arrived at the site at 9:30. Mr. Roy Moore, owner of Moore's·
Automatic Transmission and Auto Repair Shop (Moore's) met with us
,and . discussed . our sampling plan.· . • We p:roceede.d·•.t_q/ .. ari~,are:a ·•behin~L ·,(:-,;:.,
the ·shop ·an prepared to collect the first source sample. We used
the Hnu 970165 with probe R721, calibrated at a· span of 6.66.' The
calibration reading was 50 ppm .
. .... • , •.. -• _ ..... t'-·, ;:•::·:~·;,~\•.~::··-::::.;:·:,,.,.
We proceeded to .sample in a depression area where we .. suspected
' . the. drain >·pip'e '.terminated~ ; After ·,•ha'nd •· a\iger ing''t'o {' ~ppi-'bximate ly
· 2 '-0" with no indication of· any .contamination,· we asked. Mr.· Moore·
.. ·-;,,.:;,,, ~ ,; .• , _.t::o verify the l_oca~ion0 o_f, , t~,e . ~!.1~.-,.~f,i, .t?~,"'~,8:~P ;,,,P,;)?,«;,;~.,t :~.r. );t,oore
1 •''"v";C;,:{l,~\)showed us an approximatelyi,.2}'~~1:amet!3r,.p1pe]!~om:i,ng@'.~hp~~gh·,the wal~-·.
'· '· '· · ... of.' the shop at ground · 1evel; · and proj ecting'\.311) f·rom~the rwal11~f'.s'-We•''i••·e-·
• :··••., ... ,I.;\: """' .relocated .an -collected-sample -..DR:::0.02-;,SB fromc,.:J.,'·•• south,.of,•the,'.pipe:f, ,-',>s.'' .. · ; ; • \, • .!}._. ;\! ~i:i',\1.f•T··h·"' /• f~-t. j "'7 ·, •l1~~.-:-.h!4:-1,' •"NI"-~•; 1..._1','_t•. ·'t"\ ,;::..r.-.~· .• ·~~d-·-;;.·-t.,.:. :2'1'' ·a' ~it';{l.d'·"f"~',f'l,~;(Vlf.w·'·"~~F -~lr~.1··~'r{~~-~~t-'~a·-c1r,t''-\!_\itb:-.,.;,~~yl-..~~ .. i.~<1W::-... , •/1'';'>1fi;~11-W~, ~ ·'.·.,~?-~1:ci;< ~f .:( ... ,,:_-;·_~ .. 't"e_,Js9_3:• ~zwa_s;:-~1 .: s_.. f!-rt~ , o·'.· .-.-_:-...... e~~-·:;~-~-c~ .. -~~~'? e{,i,,!1;~~!:S~~ .. _;)i:~~l;U~.'~::~/·\~;~~·-
.. : · ' from 1811 • to · 2 4" ·deep. The sample· w'as ·:collect:ed ··at, ro: 10 and'.· no··' ·. ·.
readtng. was detected on the Hnu. . .: .. > ....... ·~:·_:\ --~ . $ . 'i . :.,
The residence of Mrs. Doris Corella is__ located. at _,2,4~2.i,P,t'.IY,i~-.·.'<•;·:1 Park Road. Nobody was home at the time, howevei:-;···Mrs.·•ccirel'la·•had .... , .. i
given us prior approval to sample her , well. Upo'i-i''·• 'initial : :,·• inspection no well could be located. _We suspected, that~, .. th_e:, .. -''.. , , • l• • ', ', •• • • • •• ·' ~ • . '•· -·, 1 l• ' • "
wellhead may be buried, sin<;:e the wat_er st1pply l.-;1-_n,e~:},?'?.a~_~g:,;'1._1v.1ct).e,;.•'_':.•.' crawlspace under the house Just appeared and couldcnot,.be .. tracedi--:.to;;, ,·.{;,
'
. . ' .. , ~··· , .... , ',l".J".t<.,-,i',,•:•,,,.,'."',;~; :,~ ..... ,r,.-~.-•,·~• ·.'
any area .. We proceeded to purge the well at a· tap·•oh-the··southeast .·,. corner <?f _the h°.use: .We <;:heck,ed the Ph1·, temP,~,t;a,~~f_if'f:/fp~'.~~'i:iJ/::f!J'f'.I/'' conductivity at 5 minute intervals .to'determine\1f••·.the"groundwater · ' has stabilized. ou7ing the purging, we i_13:'eJtiga1i~~'(~ri o),d ,wooden.:·,:-·•: shed located approximately 13 5 'feet sout_lf .o_f_ t~e ,_h!)_u_se ,,,and .. ~ex!= ,to.: . · ;·. ·an abandoned house. The well' supplying tne Corella· reside1\ce • is housed in this shed. A tap was located after a holding tank but before a filter system on the line feeding "the.,:,·house.·:i'1·-Tlie·:·· · parameters were checked on water obtained at the tap and were found to have stabilized after 25 ·minutes of purging.. A sample was collected at 12:10. · ·
I
Mr. Orlin Tompkins, 2425 Davis Park Road, ,was home.,the. second..,,-,, time we attempted to sample his well . .-. We had a le.ngthy dis'cu_ssion·. ·. concerning the contamination of the groundwater, the responsibility · of the former owner to inform Mr. T~mp~i1:s abo)-lt. ~h7 c:ont:c1P1._ip~ti.~n,·;·-.::-and several other matters. Mr. Tompkins· then .proceeded-to, show. us _;.-,1_ an accumulation of what appea'red to"be'.tiiue "green'_a:lgci'e.:gr~wirig,,iri•W-the. tank on his toilet. ··•Mr; Tompkiris ··requested th-,ii't·:·we ·•ta½:~. a sainple of his water inside the house. at-his sink tap as· we11 ·•1is" a.,·.·
. • • • • • • • • • ' • ; 1 .• 't .. t:•• ,'..J;.
sample outside at the wellhead. I informed Mr:· Tompkins that we · are "limited to the number of samples authoi;-~zed on,,.the. appr_<:>veq."_ • sampling plan, however, I would recolll1Dencl_. ,to ;_.t;l_J.ta. fC · D~ ,~nd ·tl_J.e•,;·-.~~-Gaston Coul}ty .Heal th Department that this sanip),incj" cbulcf be 'done, by them. We proceeded to the _wellhead in the back ·yard.. The parameters stabilized after 15 minutes; arid we collected: the .'sample at 16:50.
'·
··~ . -~ t·!' ~ ·~ -' ~ ~-'
'F . ' 's Q
"'<'
"' I ,,
\: '
f~ w:.~,. ~\~j ftlt fl~~~ -. " ' ..
,,.2 l .·· .
I
,,. -r ~' "·~ ti, ,
_-:_
~-~/'"f;
· J -/, '7 'Id ,
C T 5 -~..-~ ·' ..
-,,,';I'
~ .. ¾:~~--. ~~:
; .,
..-'. -.... ~-•,
r.; '"fO( Ja
,;,1 . C) t'.10 (I(\
/
lttf , . tt,. ,, ... ,,,_(J/
+✓. -? T . 7--·$ ,
r" 'T, l"1 ·~ r-"' 1,,.,,..,
7;1"' • r:-1 r <-•~-r7
-Z "LI $:-C) Cl
.1,,·71 "-"l '? :----._r
~-LI b3'h ~·o .
..,........._..l.. /Id ,.
•1<•:. 'r 1~s »..,,() ~~ r.:;
.
,
_-,.,-:,,:( ;;-1_:jr.f"~ f. i~~:~ . , ' .-a{ ,~',.'' i ~..:r. r,pt· · .. ~-,4-;-. '. ) .' ·t' --~-,~-. $."'$".'-' ...,,,-:• ·,:J,;.··,,.,. . • .~ ,~1t,~~._.'t"_ ?L---... ·--v:· :1 ...... .,.r .. fi.. . . . ;, . -~ . ,_-,.•(~.,!"'I-... ;,.,,-..,•.:II'! -,r r-.;;,-,/"'.,.,_,:·_, ?--• _ ........... ;/f'C": ''.·~~,.C\, _., "'r Ma I-, f ... {-' '-i·•· ~~(r_,,_"_,~:~~:j::l·1 '¢"' , ., .N ~ ~ ::.-... "'i.P~· ;i,.'.);;,~~, ~~-~-.' --~_;.;;::~--~ ·-f #~., .. -~-~~~ ~••'<'"
~ti; .. :-!; ,i.::~ ... ~-~,:_'--.;.t,.·"" ?:..-·,R
lli 1'''"~;-.,,.,_,,1,1· ,-'""-'~
1J1:fJ, t~·
,•.-' ~::., : i:: 1 !ci :. : .~;.-, ;'(:·
-'L_:J-,:l_ I "· ~ ' '. ( .7 : ,-·r/
v,'?:.fJ .J•.· -..-,.,'
'51·1
7./":/ 5'
-_i~-~-~< ··.' '! .. , .
,. ',-· .. ,. 'i~t y_'!_:_-_.,-'-. -.-', ,-'-'-',-----1---_1.-· -,.-. i,-_?c--1--3--'/'-,-, 7-=-"f------L-,~J-'/--1--~,.'-, ----,~~-;,.....:
~~ , .. ·~·;'--.?~,-.;.--,--..::..-+----~--+-7.~-. -~-L-+--.Z-c:-, 7-+--L-, _7_/....,c-~'\.,~...,--.-1·,""·:~
·\E i,:,0-·:.· --5·1,7 ~~ 1·11 :;:--~~:··
·_t_:_:_!l_,·_;~~--:~.--:~:._·_.:_-.-.·-.r-~A-_· r~~bp_ 10·,
--. ·.I. '.t, / V) .-ff ,I .'-" ... -, ~ ~--~
:r·· . .!Ji,·
:t ...,;:; '.
,ir:'t;.
')' ..
fi'&,. . _ ... ,:-~.; :~~-~·r5:-
• ~ t..
~-=·
;,;
':> ,1
:;~.-'Iii'.·
·~
··-;..:.
' p~ T ,p.._.n 5., ·"'7..1 ,·:. ~!'....: :Ir ·.'b-s .
I>. l? /~s-.1 .,;
.-:~,=---=::-t--'---'-------11-~=:=;:'--f""'....:=~:!..--J---..C~!::-i-::..-·~'•:..; __ ·~:~i ,: .. ,--~ . :;. .
":>
'
~:·
·,.,:
lo
1,-
f...
.f ..
1..,1
6, <;'/
(_s--:-
(. ~--~
~ l.
/r. 'I.
/{.,:::,
/t..2
(.
;,. 2...
/4 ;x._.
-./l 1-,,,
' J
s-; '( '{
"-rq
(.IL
(., ( 7
n°.7
17-r.7
.,_,-J.
Ii
. ; '
3~,;
2. '<:l
:r·vo.i.
--~' '.-4 • .:.. .• . . ~.-.-.
I
...
:/
:i~~
~·.,}\
·••'.J.;,.,. ~· (jc,'i/';
:-i•"'f-~· .• }
)I,\ 1H l,.L ...• 4 -. ,.,,
' [,,,~, "-'~ ~•r -..
' -~-"" p),,-1 ., rl<. I -" ......
~ v· 2.. . ,,,. ........ .s M' , .
:j~~-:·;•; >tiiii~ ~l,, I , <". / --~ ,.-} /4.J ~ ~,••
---"",4"1.,... c-c-+---·a.:-:·~~:',.1----';i'f_.:~--+-------t---:·_·w=r=.,c--+---· ~"-;c7~c:·c:c.~c'-,~--\_:!-¾·-·---~.A~,• _4 ·~tt "-:_Q_~-"-',<: 'o.J, ... _· _____ -+_~:crc·c{c•_ . .-:+c·c·c•_·,_,.c ... ,,_.c-' ?~:;-::-,~ :Jt. \~r. :.~~: ~ '~c.,tA, -: ~,,.. .. -· i I / -·i
.~·-· .<.'>-
:~ .• I. -;;~·~ !· -~-
.... 1-Q,1.,,-l. ,. • ./,/., : . ,
--L ~ D .-L.,/
J/ .. !,_/. ,f
., .. <.·.: • ;/ i.· 6r-• .
1·
I ' .-1
I
I
I ! !
I ·,
I ;
I "l l .1
. .-1
Reference 6
Davis Park Road TCE
NCD 986 175 644
I MAR 2 9 1994 IJNITED STATES ENVIR(1/WI::;11,~ PRC•'.:EC'.:'ION AGENCY RE:6i<n ~::·1 L~1~PE~r-UNO _SECT/CW/ ------J Er1viro~me~taJ $(:~vices t~vision Col Lege St2cic,11 l:oad, i,tr..,ns, (,a, 30613
DATE: 03/ l5/ 94
S"JE,JEC.':_: Resul :s of ?urgeable Ocganic Analysi "; 9L-02~4 DAVIS PARK RD 1'CE 31 GASTON=A NC CASE NO: 21:,59
F'IWM:~h~rles H. Hooper ~\v(, LS Chie!, ~abora:ory Bv2~u&tio11/Quality AssLrance Section
ro: PAT DEROSA (NC)
Att.a:ihed are th,~ r(::sults c-f 2113lysj_3 of samplE!i collected as part of th@ SLbjecc ~ro_jec~.
A3 li resuit of ~he Quality Assur·anc:e J{av~~~, cert.ain data qualifiers ma;' have been placed on tr.e data. · Att..icll-ec. is a DATA QUALIFIER R1J~ORT which ex1,lains tl1e 1:eas0r1s t.l1at. tl1~St! 9113lifiers were required.
If y,c iave any q11estions please co11ti1(:t me.
ATT/,CHMENT
-
w
--- -
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT --SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. --
♦ • • .. • • • * • • • • • • • • * * • • * • • • * • • • * * • • • • * • • • * • • * * • • • • * • • • • • * • • * • .. .. .. •• ••
PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82569 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL· SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI STATION ID: 001-SO
CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START:
D. NO.: FC81
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC 01/25/94 1105 STOP: 00/00/00
••• •• •• •• • • •• ••• * * * * *. * * • * * •• * ••• * * ••• * * *. * * * * * * *. *. * * * * * * * *. * • * •••••••• * • * •• * ••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS LIG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 12U CHLOROMETHANE 12U BROMOMETHANE 12U VINYL CHLORIDE 12U CHLOROETHANE 12U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 12U ACETONE 12U CARBON DISULFIDE 12U 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(l.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 12U 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE 12U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 12U CHLOROFORM 12U 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE 12U METHYL ETHYL KETONE 12U 1.1. 1-TRICHLOROETHANE 12U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 12U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES*•*
12U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 12U CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 12U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 12U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 12U 1 .1 .2-TR!CHLOROETHANE 12U BENZENE 12U TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE 12U BROMOFORM 12U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 12U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 12U 1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 12U TOLUENE 12U CHLOROBENZENE 12U ETHYL BENZENE 12U . STYRENE 12U TOTAL XYLENES 15 PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS rs NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--· ----SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••*. * ~ ~;; ••• * ••• * * * * ••• * * * •••• * * * •• PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82566 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL •• SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SJ •• STATION JD: 002-SB .. .. CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.:
* • • • • * * * * * * • * • • * * * * * • • • * • • * • * PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: H ZINN CITY: GASTONIA ST: NC COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1010 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: FC78
--
03/14/94
• • • ... .. .. .. .. .. *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * * * •. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 120J 12U 12U 12U 38 12U 12U 12U BJ 12U 12U
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE VINYL CH LOR IDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE ... 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1-DJCHLOROETHANE 1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
.,., •FOOTNOTES•••
12U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 12U CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 20 TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 12U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 12U 1,1.2-TRJCHLOROETHANE 12U BENZENE 12U TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 12U BROMOFORM 12U METHYL !SOBUTYL KETONE 12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 20U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 12U 1 .1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 79 TOLUENE 12U CHLOROBENZENE 20U ETHYL BENZENE 12U STYRENE 210 TOTAL XYLENES 14 PERCENT MOISTURE
•••REMARKS***
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATJON LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY F_OR VERIFICATION.
-SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82567 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SJ PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA
-
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC
.. •• .. ..
••
STATION ID: 003-SB COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1025 STOP: 00/00/00 CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.: D. NO.: FC79
--
f"\'") I< A ,,._ • '-''-'/ l'"f/;::f'4
•• •• ..
•• ••
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 100U 12U 12U 12U 260 12U 12U 12U
7J 12U 12U
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE( 1. 1-0lCHLOROETHYLENE) 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE 1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
12U 12U 17 12U 12U 2J 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 230 12U 45 12U 330 19
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE CJS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1.1.2-TRJCHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRANS-1 .3-DJCHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE METHYL BUTYL KETONE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1 .1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES PERCENT MOISTURE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALU~ GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATJON LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA .UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLJNG AND REANALYSIS JS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ...
•• •• •• •• ...
• • • • • • • • • • • • • * * * • • * * • • • • * * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f:CJECT hiO. 94-0244 $AMPLE NO. 82568 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SJ STATION ID: 004-58
CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.: • • • UG/KG
12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 38 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U 12U
* • • • ' * • ' • * * • ' * • ' ' ' • * • ' * ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE
~~~~8~c£l6~6HB~NEc1.1-DiCHL0RoETHYLENEJ 1.l~DICHLOROETHANE 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE 1.1.1-TRJCHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMOOICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
. . . . . . .. . ***•*••········ .. ·· PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC 1045 COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 STOP: 00/00/00
0. NO.: FCSO
UG/KG
12U 12U 4J 12U 12U
12u· 12U 12U 12ll 12U 12U 12U
46 12U 12U 12U 100 18
* • • • * * * * • * * • * * • ' • • • ' ' ' ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1.2-DJCHLOROPROPANE CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRJCHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ DJBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM
METHYL I SOBllTYL KETONE METHYL BUTYL KETONE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 ,1 ,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES PERCENT MOISTURE
_,_ D3/14/94
• • • • •• •• .. .. •• .. . ..
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
---SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANICS -DATA REPORT ••• . . C ' • • . . • • .. PROJECT NO. 94-0244 .. SOURCE: DAVIS PARK .. STATION JD: 002-SB .. CASE. NO.: 21559 .. ... • • • • • • • • • •
•••FOOTNOTES•••
•
RD
•
• • • • SAMPLE TCE SI
SAS
• • •
400JN !OOOJN
600JN 500JN SOOJN 300JN 400JN 2000J
•
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • NO. 82566 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
NO.:
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
. ANAL YTJCAL RESULTS UG/KG
TRIMETHYLHEXANE DECANE ETHYLMETHYLHEPTANE TRIMETHYLBENZENE UNDECANE
•
•·. METHYL ( METHYL ETHYL J BENZENE ETHYLDIMETHYLBENZENE 3 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
• • • • • • • • • • • • • PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START: D. NO.: FC78
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
-
• • • • • COLLECTED
01/25/94
• • • • •
• • • • • BY: H ZINN ST: NC
-
• • •
-__ .J
• • •
1010 STOP: 00/00/00 MD NO:
• • • • • • • • • • •
03/14/94
• • • • ... • • ..
•• .. .. • • • • . ..
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•LI-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATJON LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, A_THEMS, GA. MT$CELU\HEC!JS ~LlRGCA5LE OHGANICS -DATA REPORT .. ..
•• •• ..
*******••*•"'***"***" * • • • • * • • * • PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82567 SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL STATION ID: 003-SB CASE.NO.: 21559 SAS NO.:
·4000J 600JN 2000JN 700JN 500JN
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
5 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS ETHYLMETHYLBENZENE TRIMETHYLBENZENE (2 ISOMERS) UNDECANE .,. METHYL ( METHYLETHYL J BENZENE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
••• PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 D. NO.: FC79
BY: H ZINN ST: NC
--
1025 STOP: 00/00/00 MD NO:
--
03/14/94
• • • ... .. ., .. .. ..
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. MISCELLANEOUS PURGEABLE ORGANTc.5 -DATA RE?GRT ... •• .. ...
•• ..
'°''!~~ ............ "****"*" • • • • • • • • • • • • • PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82568 SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
STATION ID: 004-SB CASE.NO.: 21559 SAS NO.:
200JN 600JN 200JN 400JN 600J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
ETHYLMETHYLBENZENE TRIMETHYLBENZENE (3 ISOMERS) DIETHYLBENZENE ETHYLDIMETHYLBENZENE (2 ISOMERS) ... 3 UNI/IIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
*••FOOTNOTES•••
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 D. NO.: FCSO
BY: H ZINN ST: NC
-
1045 STOP: 00/00/00 MD NO:
--03/14/94 ... .. .. •• • • ..
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPL!NG AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ... •• * • • • • • * • • • • * * • * • • • • • PROJECT NO. 9~-0~44 SAMPLf NO. 82573 SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. . . . SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA
--
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC
- -
03/14/94
• • • ••• ,. •• •• ••
STATION JD: 001-PW COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1445 STOP: 00/00/00 •• • • •• .. CASE NO.: 21559
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
JOU CHLOROMETHANE IOU BROMOMETHANE 10U VINYL CHLORIDE IOU CHLOROETHANE 10U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 10U ACETONE IOU CARBON DISULFIDE ..
SAS NO.:
JOU 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(l ,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 10U 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE 10U 1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 10U CHLOROFORM 10U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE 10U METHYL ETHYL KETONE -JOU 1, 1. 1-TRICHLOROETHANE 10U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 10U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES••"'
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE lOU .CIS-1. 3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 10U OIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE JOU 1,1 .2-TRJCHLOROETHANE 10U BENZENE 10U TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE JOU BROMOFORM IOU . METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE JOU METHYL BUTYL KETONE JOU TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) IOU 1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 10U TOLUENE JOU CHLOROBENZENE 10U ETHYL BENZENE 10U STYRENE 10U TOTAL XYLENES
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE ·•N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF ~ATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATER!AL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT • * • • • * • • * • • • • • • • • • 62574
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION JV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
• * * • • • * ~ ~ ; • • SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA PROG ELEM: SSf CITY: GASTONIA
-
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN
- --03/14/94
• • • . .. ,.
... •• •• .. PROJECT NO. 94-0244 S.•.MPL~ SOURCE.: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI STATION ID: 002-PW COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 ST: NC 1540 STOP: 00/00/00 .. .. .. •• •• CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.: D. NO.: FC86 • • ••• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * •• * * •• * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * *. * *. * • * * * * * * * * • -~·
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS IOU IOU 10U IOU 10U 10U IOU 1 OU 10U 10U IOU 10U IOU 10U 10U 10U
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE . 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(l .1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE 1 .2-DJCHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
**•FOOTNOTES•••
10U 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 10U CIS-1.3-D!CHLOROPROPENE 10U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) JOU D!BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1 OU· 1 . 1 . 2-TR I CHLOROETHANE JOU BENZENE 1ou· TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10U BROMOFORM 10U . METHYL !SOBUTYL KETONE 10U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 10U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 10U 1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE lOU TOLUENE lOU CHLOROBENZENE 10U ETHYL BENZENE IOU STYRENE IOU TOTAL XYLENES
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE Of MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT .. •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82570 SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCF. SI STATION ID: CU3-Pw
CASE NO.: 21559
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA~REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
SAMPLE TYP!:: GP.CUi~LIWA
SAS NO.
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START: 01/25/94
D. NO.: FC82
BY: H ZINN ST: NC
-- -
1210 STOP: 00/00/00
.. .. ..
• • • • *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * •. * * * * * * * * * * * •.• * * * .• * * * * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE 10U BROMOMETHANE 10U VINYL CHLORIDE lOU CHLOROETHANE lOU METHYLENE CHLORIDE 10U ACETONE 10U CARBON DISULFIDE lOU 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l .1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 10U 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 10U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 10U CHLOROFORM 10U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE 10U METHYL ETHYL KETONE lOU 1,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 10U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
10U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 10U CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10 TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) lOU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE lOU 1,1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU BENZENE lOU TRANS-1 .3-D!CHLOROPROPENE 10U BROMOFORM 10U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE lOU METHYL BUTYL KETONE 10U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) lOU 1 . 1 . 2; 2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 10U TOLUENE 10U CHLOROBENZENE 10U ETHYL BENZENE 10U STYRENE 10U TOTAL XYLENES
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-INTERFERENCEs· •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPT!VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS. THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-SMAPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
PROJECT NO. 94-0244· SAMPLE NO. 82575 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA
-
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC
.. .. ..
•• .. STATION ID:. 004-PW COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1600 STOP: 00/00/00
CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO. D.NO.:FC87
-C3/14/94
•• .. .. .. .. *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
lOU
lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU
2J lOU lOU .
lOU lOU lOU lOU
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE .-1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE(l. 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE 1,1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES***
lOU 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE IOU CIS-1 .3-D!CHLOROPROPENE 38 TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ lOU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE lOU 1 .1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU BENZENE lOU TRANS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE IOU BROMOFORM IOU. METHYL ISOBUTYL ~ETONE lOU -METHYL BUTYL KETOfiE lOU TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) lOU 1 .1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE lOU TOLUENE lOU CHLOROBENZENE lOU ETHYL BENZENE IOU STYRENE . lOU TOTAL XYLENES
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •LI-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-··-····•.,
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, .ATHENS, GA.
PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82576 SAMP~E TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SJ
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED BY: H ZINN CITY: GASTONIA ST: NC
l!!!!!l!I 1!!11!1
.. .. .. .. .. STATION ID: 005-PW COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1650 STOP: 00/00/00
CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.:
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE 10U BROMOMETHANE 10U VINYL CHLORIDE 10U CHLOROETHANE lOU METHYLENE CHLORIDE lOU ACETONE 10U CARBON·DISULFIDE ~ 10U 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 10U 1.1~DICHLOROETHANE 10U 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) lOU CHLOROFORM lOU 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE lOU METHYL ETHYL KETONE lOU 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 10U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE lOU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
D. NO.: FC88
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
lOU 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE lOU CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 11 TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) lOU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 10U 1 ,1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU BENZENE 10U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 1 OU BROMOFORM · lOU METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE lOU METHYL BUTYL KETONE 10U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 10U 1 .1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE lOU TOLUENE lOU CHLOROBENZENE lOU ETHYL BENZENE lOU STYRENE lOU TOTAL XYLENES
==
G3/i4/94
•• .. ..
• • ••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE. •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPL!NG AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA.
PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82571 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC ** ** ** . .. STATION ID: 006-PW COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1240 STOP: 00/00/00
•• CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.: D. NO.: FC83
03/14/94
•• •• ..
•• •• *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * * * * * .• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L -ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 5J 10U 10U_
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE .
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1-0!CHLOROETHANE 1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM
1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE 1.1.1-TR!CHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•:nREMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
10U IOU 51 10U IOU
10U 10U IOU IOU. IOU 18 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U 10U
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRANS-I .3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE METHYL BUTYL KETONE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1 .1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •ll-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R~oc INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
---- -- -
, __ .
• ....... ....u.1
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
••• • • • • • • • * •••• * * * •.••••••••••••••••
•• PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82577 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA •• SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI •• STATION ID: 101-PW •• .. CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START: 01/25/94
D. NO.: FC89
-
BY: H ZINN ST: NC
- -
0725 STOP: 00/00/00
- -
03/14/94
• • • ••• .. .. •• •• •• ••• • • • • * ••••••••• •.• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• * ••••••••••••••••••••
UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
lOU CHLOROMETHANE lOU BROMOMETHANE lOU VINYL CHLORIDE lOU CHLOROETHANE lOU METHYLENE CHLORIDE lOU ACETONE 1 OU CARBON DISULFIDE ... lOU 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) lOU 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE lOU 1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) lOU CHLOROFORM lOU 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE lOU METHYL ETHYL KETONE lOU 1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU CARBON TETRACHLORIDE lOU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES•••
lOU 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE lOU CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE lOU TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 10U OIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE lOU 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU BENZENE lOU TRANS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE lOU BROMOFORM
lOU METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE lOU METHYL BUTYL KETONE lOU TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) lOU 1 .1 ,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE lOU TOLUENE lOU CHLOROBENZENE lOU ETHYL BENZENE lOU STYRENE lOU TOTAL XYLENES
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA~NOT ANALYZED •NAI-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY QR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-~
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
••• PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82578 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI
• • * • * • • • PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA
-
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC
.. .. .. .. ••
STATION ID: 104-PW COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1700 STOP: 00/00/00
CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.: D. NO.: FC90
-D3/14/94
• • • ... .. .. .. .. ..
,,. * • * * * * * •• * * * * * *. * •• * * * •• * * * * * * * * * * * •• * * * *. * * *. *. * * •••• * ' *. * ' * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
lOU lOU lOU ·lOU lOU lOU lOU 10U 10U lOU 11 lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE .. 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM 1.2-DICHLOROETHANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU . lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU lOU
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1 .1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE METHYL BUTYL KETONE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1. 1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
•••FOOTNOTES••*
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT .. .. .. •• ..
PROJECT NO. 94-0244 SAMPLE NO. 82565 SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI STATION JD: 105-PW
CASE NO.: 21559
-----
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION JV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDV/A
SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTION START:
D. NO.: FC77
COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC
--
01/25/94 0730 STOP: 00/00/00
08/14/94
.. .. ..
• • •• *** * * * * * * .* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANA.LYTICAL RESULTS ,au ,au ,au ,ou ,au 10U ,ou ,au
10U
1 OU 3J ,au ,au ,ou 10U
1 OU
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE
t~~8~c~l6~6~rn~NE(1 ,1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
~J'.ito2<S¥~~~ROETHENE ( TOTAL)
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
•••FOOTNOTES***
,au ,au ,au ,ou 10U
lOU ,au ,au 10U . ,au
1 OU ,au ,au ,ou ,ou ,ou ,au
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE · BROMOFORM METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE METHYL BUTYL KETONE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 ,1 ,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE . STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTJTATION LIMIT. •R~oc INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-,,, .. , ... , .. ........ -........ - -
~ - - -
~ ~ wa --- - - - -
~ ,.__ :__J __ _...;
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT IV ESD, ... •• •• •• •• ••
• * • ~ ~ ~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • * • • • PROJECT NO, 94-0244 SAMPLE NO, 82572 SAMPLE TYPE: GROUNDWA SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD TCE SI STATION ID: _106-PW
CASE NO.: 21559 SAS NO.:
ATHENS. GA.
PRDG ELEM: SSF CITY: GASTONIA COLLECTED BY: H ZINN ST: NC COLLECTION START: 01/25/94 1250 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: FC84
-03/14/94
• •• •• •• • • •• • • ••• • * * * • * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * •• * * •• * * * * * * * *. * * * * *. *. * *. * * * * * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
10U CHLOROMETHANE ,au BROMOMETHANE lOU VINYL CHLORIDE lOU CHLOROETHANE lOU METHYLENE CHLORIDE lOU ACETONE lOU CARBON DISULFIDE .. _ lOU 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(l.1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) lOU 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE lOU 1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) lOU CHLOROFORM lOU 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE lOU METHYL ETHYL KETONE SJ 1. 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE ,au CARBON TETRACHLORIDE lOU BROMODICHLOROMETHANE_
•••REMARKS•••
•••FOOTNOTES•••
lOU 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE lOU CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 50 TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) lOU DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ,au 1 ., ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE lOU BENZENE 10U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 10U BROMOFORM lOU -METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 10U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 17 TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) lOU 1 ,1 .2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ,au TOLUENE lOU CHLOROBENZENE lOU ETHYL BENZENE lOU STYRENE JOU TOTAL XYLENES
•••REMARKS•••
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT. · •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-
I UAvi~ ~AKI<'.. RD Ao IC~ 51-r~. Reference 7
Davis Park Road TCE
I NCD 986 175 644
2.'' ~18
I I '
I I I ~ ®@ I l !..0 1' 1 -
,,,}> I
I ~ I 0-/ .,
/ I
/
I 3 t> I
I I
I I --I \/)
I I
I
I . ....:!-2. -ct
I
I AP..EA I 1. '.l -::: AR.r:.A ' 2. 4 -AEctA \ :1'-l
I ~ ½_(il.J(1.Y) -Y:i.... (J 1)( q)
I = 9o , .... 1.
= 0./;lS" -Ft 1...
I
I S .,_ .-t> I e. l l\..'f ~~t !=",~I J Lo~ \l Q ... \-1..'l-· 9 s-
I b'( ~ ....... , y 7., ..;..._
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ~ I
I-Iandbook of
Reference 8
Davis Park Road TCE
NCD 986 175 644
NORRIS • HINCHEE • BROWN • MCCARTY
SEMPRINI • WILSON • KAMPBELL
REJNHARD • BOUWER •BORDEN• VOGEL
THOMAS• WARD
Project Officer
John E. Matthews
Chief, Applications and Assistance Branch
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory
Ada, Oklahoma
LEWIS PUBLISHERS
Boca Raton Ann Arbor London Tokyo
"/ .
'{
;,
' ;
. ; i : '
i ,,
·j;
" I' !.
I-
i: .,
r:: :!): n·. ;::: q I: ' i :·.
Vi.-
.
; i·
'
•·
ii· ·; .. ,t· ,,_.
:;., . '"
• . ..
·-
:,::
L
.·:!J:·t; NI"· 1r ...
rt.:1>·.
:,~u:·-
tt:: -i~~IL
i\;.'.:.
206 Handbook of Bioremediation
jf.
-<ti
,)Ji:
been observed to undergo epoxidation, and hexachlorobenzene, which have all carbons :}:N;:
occupied with chlorine substituents, allowing no site for hydroxylation. These highly :iii/<:;/;
chlorinated organic compounds are not, however, resistant to anaerobic biodegradation ':},¥ji'
(Vogel and McCarty, 1985; Gibson and Stiflita, 1986; Tiedje et al., 1987; Vogel and }Zf,'t
McCarty, 1987a; Vogel, 1988; Freedman and Gossett, 1989; Bagley and Gossett, 1990; Nies'::';':{
and Vogel, 1990; Bhatnagar and Fathepure, 1991). · _:\f~•-
10.4.2. Anaerobic :)el
Under different anaerobic conditions, both in laboratory studies and in the'{;/v'J
environment, highly chlorinated organics, such as tetrachloroethylene (Vogel arid ·.,;;f•
McCarty, 1985), hexachlorobenzene (Gibson and Suflita, 1986), and polychlorinated \\\1•
biphen:;ls (Nies an~ Vogel, 1990), have been ~hown to undergo reductive ~echl9rin?tion. \?t
Reduct10ns of chlorinated solvents normally mvolve the removal of a chlonne substituent .;~et:·'•
and either its replacement with a hydrogen or removal of a second chlorin·e substituent:."':~-. . .,,,;\, .. from alkanes and format10n of an alkene. The first mechanism, commonly called --j:iA
reductive dechlorination, can occur with both alkanes and alkenes. Reductive ,:.1,<c'i,
dechlorination has been described for the sequence of ethylenes from tetrachlo.roethylene· '.ft~~i
to vinyl chloride (Vogel and McCarty, 1985) (Figure 10.1) and to ethylene (Freedman and 'cf/{\;
Gossett, 1989), and for TCA to chloroethane (Vogel and McCarty, 1987a) (Figure 10.2) ,i1;1;:_?
under methanogenic conditions in laboratory studies. In the case of TCA, potential ;f;i~i
products are complicated by the chemical reactions (denoted by A) that co-occur with ·-H!JP
biological reactions. Relative rate studies on the reductive dechlorination o'f various j\ffi
chlorinated ethanes and ethenes have shown a general decrease in rate with decreasing '-if'ft&i
number of chlorine substituents, opposite to the trend shown_ for oxidation reactionsjfft'.1
under aerobic conditions: The relative rates of reduction under methanogenic conditions .'.{Mi;
have been quantified in two cases (Table 10.2) (Bouwer and McCarty, 1988; Vogel, 1988). :;if.;/;:
From these data and that for the chemical reactivity described above, the disappearance?}@\!
of an i1;itial c?lorinat~d solvent_ and the _appea~ance of its products under favor_able:f~~!(
anaerobic condit10ns might be denved, as will be discussed later. · ::'ii~~-
.;/!~-'t? ~-~J:
CCl2=CCJi __.. CHCl=CCl2
jrcEI ITcaj
1.2-DCE
H Cl· C=C
CJ H
H H
C=C
Cl Cl
1.2-DCE
I ' ,·:TI.::::r " . O::f,,f / jv~;~~~~o~:dcl I CE~~~~czl -2COz + HCI :;~j{)
I . ;,·,!.,,~ . -;·_=i':~~-.
·;(~~-: Figure 10. I. PCE anaerobic transformations.
.·:~1~t1
.
·:_:t~~i~:
. ... i/~~/
./lril . ::·.:-;!"~£:'
;:t,:~ :.,.,:.i\r-r ·.-~-'I~P l
·nt1
,.
~ ·:
1 ...
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
May 11, 1994
File
Harry Zinn, Environmental Engineer·
Reference 9
Davis Park Road TCE
NCD 986 175 644
North Carolina DEHNR, Superfund Section
Private Well Data for Davis Park Road TCE Site Gastonia/ Gaston County, North Carolina NCD 986 175 644
On October 14, 1993 I talked to Mr. W.L. Godwin, 2231 Davis Park Road about the construction of his well. Mr. Godwin stated that his well is 6 inches in diameter and is approximately 70 feet deep.
On October 14, 1993 I talked to Mrs. Pauline Philbeck, 2301 Davis Park Road about the construction of her well. Mrs. Philbeck did not k_now any information about her well.
On October 14, 1993 I talked to Mrs. Doris Corella, 2403 Davis Park Road about the construction of her well. Mrs. Corella did not know any information about her well.
On October 14, 1993 I talked to Mr: Charles May, 2419 Davis Park Road about the construction of his well. Mr. May stated that his well is 6 inches in diameter and is approximately 18T feet deep.
On October 14, 1993 I talked to Mr. Cregg Bess about the contaminated well which previously served the Cedar Oak Park Subdivision. Mr. Bess stated that the .well is 6 inches in diameter and is approximately 150 feet deep. The system the well supplied has 26 hook-ups.
I
I
I
11
I J
11
IJ
~J
~ ., _,
11
1
I;
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Case Number 21559 Project Number 94-0244 SAS Number Site ID. Davis Park _Rd TCE Site, Gastonia, NC
Affected Sample
Volatiles
82565
82566
82566,82567
82567
82568
82571, 82572
82575
Compound or Fraction
Flag
UsedReason
chloroform J acetone J 1,1,1-trichloroethane J benzene J trichloroethene J 1,1,1-trichloroethane J 1,2-dichloroethene,total J
<quantitation limit
erratic response factor <quantitation limit
<quantitation limit <quantitation limit <quantitation limit
<quantitation limit
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MEMO
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
January 24, 1996
File
Harry Zinn, Environmental Engineer
North Carolina DEHNR, Superfund Section
Reference 10
Davis Park Road TCE
NCD 986 175 644
Groundwater Population Calculations for Davis Park Road TCE Site
Gastonia/ Gaston County, North Carolina
NCD 986 175 644
On September 11, 1995 I calculated the population inside the Target Distance
Limits (TDL's) for the Davis Park Road TCE site. First I located the community
wells supplied by the N.C. Public Water Supply Section on the topographic maps and
delineated those houses associated with them. Several community wells which do not
serve over 30 people are identified on Figure 2. These wells and the Cedar Oak Park
Subdivision population was determined by house counts on Figure 2. Next I delineated
the area of Gastonia served by the Gaston Water Supply System.
Several areas depicted as urban areas on the topographic maps, pink with no
individual houses shown, are located within the TDL's and are not served by the
Gaston Water Supply System. These areas were planimetered and the area (sq. mi.)
was multiplied by the population density (315.3 people/sq. mi.) for South Gastonia.
TDL AREA (sq.mi.) DENSITY POPULATION
(people/sq.mi.)
0 -!<' 0.0533 315.3 17
!<' -½ 0.0333 315.3 10
½ -l 0.202 315.3 64
l -2 0.956 315.3 3 01
2 -3 0.105 315.3 33
3 -4 0.000 315.3 0
Finally those houses not included in any of the above areas were counted. All of
t:he house counts were multiplied by the population density (2.64 people/house) for
Gaston County.
I
I .~·····~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1:Jb;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GROUNDWATER POPULATION
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
Urban Areas not Supplied by the Gaston Water District
TDL Area (sa. mi.) Density
o -¼ mile 0.0533 315.3
¼-½mile 0.0333 315.3
½-1 mile 0.202 315.3
1 - 2 miles 0.956 315.3
2 - 3 miles 0.105 315.3
3 - 4 miles 0.00 315.3
Density Is based on 1990 US Census Data
House Count from Topographic Maps
TDL Houses Densitv
0-¼ mile 30 2.64
¼-½ mile 20 2.64
½-1 mile 17 2.64
1 - 2 miles 249 2.64
2-3miles 544 2.64
3 - 4 miles 462.00 2.64
Density Is based on 1990 US Census Data
Total Groundwater Population
TDL House Count Urban Areas
0-¼ mile 79 17
¼-½ mile 53 10
½-1 mile 45 64
1 - 2 miles 657 301
2 - 3 miles 1436 33
3 - 4 miles 1220 0
Pooulation
17
10
64
301
33
0
Population
79
53
45
657 ·
1436
1220
Comm. Wells Total Pao.
66 162
352 415
190 299
994 1952
4339 5808
2137 3357
I
I ITDL
To -¼ mile
I
I r¼-½mile
I 1½-1 mile
I f1 - 2 miles
I
I r2 -3 miles
I
I
I
I
I
I
'3-4miles
I
I
I
I
I
GROUNDWATER POPULATION
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
COMMUNITY WELLS
Well ID and Name
B -Hedaewood Circle7C0-11) .
NA -Moore Communitv Well7CO-22T
NA-Puritan Commun[tv Well lCQ-4\
I Subtotal
A -Jenkins Communitv WellTco-3\
3 -Cedar Oak Park SID
6 -Pennv Park Dr. SID
9 -Skvland Dr. SID
12 -Vallevdale S/0
· Isubtotal
126 -Old Providence S/0
128 -Silverstone S/D
Subtotal
15 -Kina Grant S/D
21 -Mountain Villaae MHP
23 -Brimer Rental Pronertv
25 -Oaklev Park #2
I Subtotal
1 -Alan Acres
2 -Beverlv Acres
11 -Sunset Park SID
13 -Lamar Acres
14 -Park Place
16 -Maolecrest SID
17 -Hickorv Villaae MHP
19 -Brenvwood MHP
24 -Northwoods MHP
27 -Rabv's MHP
29 -South lane S/D
30 -Suburban MHP
32 -Woodland Acres
34 -Windwood Acres SID
35 -Raintree SID
39 -Fallscrest 11 SID
40 -South Forest SID
41 -Amv Acres
42 -Castlewood SID ..
45 -Shadv Rest MHP
47 -Chaoel Acres MHP
48 -Scarrow MHP
50 -D M Rentals
51 -Hickorv Creek SID
52 -Robinwood Lake
53 -Chanel Grove Elem. School
I Subtotal
5 -Lakewood SID
7 -Pines MHP
8 -Robinbrook Place
10 -Suburban Heinhts SID
18 -Jack-A-Shell MHP
22 -Fairfax S/0
31 -Weslev Acres #2
36 -Southamoton S/D
37 -South Hills Estate Ill
38 -Woodleinh S/0
43 -Stonev Oaks SID
44 -Bethanv MHP
46 -Snowshoe MHP
49 -Covlnnton MHP
I Subtotal
* These population figures are based on house
counts from Figure 2 multiplied by the density
for Gaston County
Pon.
42
8
16
66
29
69
34
60
160
352
30
160
190
519
135
40
300
994
417
147
344
159
135
240
160
70
75
84
48
186
128
88
256
240
124
60
135
65
150
81
65
25
100
757
4339
144
210
84
200
80
240
183
140
76
353
36
75
56
260
2137
•
Cl
0
,_
. . ····.·,. __ .·_.,.,-.. _',,;.,-..
C
---
• q
PWS-ID, SYSTEN NAt1E
13511? 1·a· 1:.:"'':~sg .-~:-:::s
1ac1rt 121:.:~;:n.,;, p-r:w
1as1sa a L ns=R:n:.
136154 FOXFIRE.S/D ·.:.
136155:LAKEWOOD S_,,J?.
136165 118!::lf"T:iiJDF.931: ., _ _;
/.;.": ~QWl+AI'.'S"":'28J'.: "D
136174 PENNY PARK·.•DR;-lJTP. SYS
136176 PINES MHP:·;::;
c· :·:. PINES MHPf:..:·.:·.:·~:
, ... ,. I c..., COi , ..... P" r::c,...i;s
·. CC' 1t1 ... r" ...,-nc;,...
136185-,R□BINBROOK PLACE
136109 ·. SKYLAND · DR ·
C.P!D
13619S STARRLMND · COMMUtHTY SUPPLY
"lo:: 136197.:SUBURBArJ:HEIGHTS 5.,-!)
11 136198 SUNSET. PARK S/D
11.' 1?6199 UALLEYDALE'-'~UB COMM SUP-PL"-(
,,~-.-~,L4L-<E~ .. ~-,=,L-<E~s~e~.S--<E~=~,~::~: ~-~,~-=~
136204 YORKWOOD S/0' ·
136205
\) ··-136206 ,, ,,
"
-
136207
136211
136220
136221
-
,ORJ.WBO& .:. 8 ·'
FORESTBROOK S/D
LAMAR· ACRES .
L ·,11 .F. · . .:F.=3
PARK PLACE
Y. IrlGS GRANT S/D
!1APLECPEST 5,, D
11ARIA PFIRV. 5Vfl t·-::ir·' r-• ,.,, •
- - -
;:_;:,:,;,:: t.:.C. t'11E}1-lt :1-,lt.<· :.:_•,>; ·_·,-:::Y::.~·;:,t! OO-.:'c:'-"';.<':
;--,,: I ~•JE S't.30 :Ci 6
'..r;1 l TL•:>E, 3~;: ~-•,)-~-.,, ~5 1 730 ;··:u:;t;:; I fU[•E, -~-•:; ! ,_.-;-:,,:, _,. f.'81 17:',1)
RES. PCRSOi~
!Yf'!:. FOPCUYT!Otl IJURK -PHOrJE SOVRCl: rJ;<r1E --------------------· -----------
:-: 11:-;::.:-::
·-•--0·--c u1m,N /ltE.A 4C · .• ..:...:-:f{°'.:'_'·
C '3! 8002225607
·1,--,-_
:JELL tll
•JELL 1 B
',i[l..L C
C
C
s .. 70-rn5'~~Ele4
! 4':-704865535$
1 4~ 70486553':,5
PELL
GASTOtl!A.CITY
. .....:::._
C
C
C
C
-
84 7(148658927 ;.J',!..L
.35 70486'46711 MELI-tll .. ·s-·,·2c··_
160' 70""17341539 WELL Ill
l 65 . 7(?.!15:Z.!:?_7990 tJELL
244 70.48242879 !,JELL
! !'3 ~l':366508!7 l,1£LLS _ ·-c·::-cz. .. ... s
372 7045257~,:;,:., ;.:£LL
I SO 7048679':-~-l :.!El I.S
1 13 70-18679'· J-l l,iELL -:: 1 ~ 7,:,.is::s7:---1,) •-•rL :_
.;4•;· 7(•-1•1782'7' ::ELL
7,_·,.19,;4 ! f. :I.L'.c:
-- - -
SOURCE SOURCE
TYPE AUAIL.
G p
G p
G p
,, ?
E p
6 p
: E -·--p
C C
6 p
G p
r, p
G p
G p
p p
G p
G p
G p
G p
G p
G p
r, p
r, p
r, p
G p
G p
p
G p
- -
LATITUDE LONGITUDE
351515
3512""10 ·
351110~-
ar, .........
3C1715
351715
351715.
3""1015
3EIGIS
3':,1330
351306
~
351111
351620
351200
3513SO
351428
351057
351500
351340
3:_::1245
351310
351200
351200
351500
'351455
3~1-ll4
811500
8111 JS
011230
s•9e12_
811718
611718
Pl 1530·
811220
810936
~ \,1/,UAII,,
011:;:10
B10750
811000
811310
Bl 1321
Bl 1258
Bl 1500
Bl 1321·
Bl 1220
Bl 1220
Bl 1325
811200
811300
811515
811312
--- -
'>:;.· ·.•.:-,; .. . -'-:;.:''. .... -►.
.;;c·;;·; ~tt-;
·~--;.;. {t;._+.j.~ 'i' tf\,.:~f :,
--
-------, ~ PAGE_
lo rl .c~ Pt:=:.:.. :c l·)ATER·.SUPPL y SYSTEM
. :~1-::TIVi: S,STE:115 ··.·', -
GRID LATiTUl.JE: 35100,;J >;.3517~:•). i.:.□l~GIT!JDE! :0810730
. ·---:RES.FERSON :-i~:0 ····· '."_"pw_s· ID 5YST°EM tlArtE TYPE. POPULATIOI~ :WURi-: PHOtlE ·sot.:RCE~ NF,rlE
SOURCE SOURCE
TYPE AUAIL. LATITUDE LONGITUDE
•
•
.0
C
l
-
-·,i· ;\1•;::~~~;_;;;;_ HIC~~RY .. VIL~A~~; rtMH~PP· .. : .. , ,;:---. ·.(,-~,~·:_,.;.~ .,· .. : · 111e1mR1 VILL."1C.E
.. : C p 3S1418-·._·:·':ii·-i-:-· G :.~." . t-G&,-e7--"~-----<><-¼+!<>-35· 1 !8
. p.
p
p .·.
·: _: __ ~--p
•. , C--..... :,. ',-,=:-,_.,:_.8~ff~. . ' P
351130
·351530··'
351300·
·:351450
. 351200 ·
351300
. 3511 99
· '·3511ee .. 3£TJS0
351116.
3""' l 19
351126
. .. : .. ~351310··
3513'9
351415 ·
351230 -·;.-2, :-.136271 RABY'S tlHP-. · · C ., .. :··e0:.;70~8660·155,WELL-i ·. c· P ··::.--.',·,/ ... <.<.·:·,~--: .. · AC-El'Hls0 !=1!1?'·{;· -.-:'':'•;~,;,-:--:--~·,...-:-.,,..., ' .• ,oa-----ee~----,3S'+;,a<._ RAB•'•,.. •~11P·:·: ..,c;_: :·;·,:.:·:~c·.~~-.~~-·-·-:-.,.·;,,...,_, 3::22'?
:".28·:..·.136279 SILVERSTONE" S/D. c: . i_·.99.:•70:44702785.'.lJELL'::'. ::
~ ').9_,i .. 136280 :·SOUTH LANE•;SUDDIVISIOtl C. ·-·;:39".S0022Z'.:-'co07.-;WELL_.·;: 1
)0,/,~~~-~~-~~:~~=~~~-,~~= :X . ~-' :.,91?>~•-!:,~·WELL-in· ·
.-,:;165_:;704SE,7·:·s34·: WELL:.··
l oo;.70452:M'.:27. WELL "' 32.
" ,,
'8
;; 136287
136289
I ~622?
1362?1
13£:!97
13630◄ 11c~o?
WESLEY--ACRES i:2.
WOODLAND.'ACRES
LAUREL:wooos·S/D
C?t'Tl!(;ATF "'. , ... v • :1
SBl:Hl 16,'.TE _ :;;: I .:.
· 136312 · WINDWOOD_: ACRES· S/D · ·
13632◄ ~~i~!=~~ ~~g .:·_·. ~~.
I 'iC?¢""
136329
136334
136335
136336
"RAINTREE;S/D
n·1t•~i:;E-c ·p
R'HIH'REE 5 I?
I !QQPI !At C ,.... ·D
PINElJIEW S/0
SOUTHAMPTON S✓O
SSi:JTl!II, TOIi __;, B
SOUTH HILL ESTATE _I I I
WOODLEIGH S/(l
li909LE!Cil I _ 'E
tt?BI,: E:s11 '.:' -c,
J9 136337 FALLSCRESl" II 5/[,
C
C
C-
~.
C
C URS..,11 A-t.El
C
C
C
185'· 9.i°06b5C,8J-7: lJ_ELL'· -: :s .. -·-:-9 "3
· .-.'·Go ,-70482428]9 •WELL ·-..:··
· -~6,;.,70-.e::..:.:;::3'7,9 '.t.!ELL _ J ~ 2, 4, s .: , ,... -2 ,., '
40 70481::•!"!41 WELL t:Z
'1·•:n 7048.::-1:-,:,:79 \JELL l:l2
I 19 7,:-0--18:::.;.'.:.;79 ~IEU_
353 80,:,2.:.:.::· •· 07 UEI..L n i
G
G
G
G
G
G
. ·.c.
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
351415
351312
351430
351130
351515
351445
351411
351136
351132
351315
351300
351406
3513Ql
351206
911530
811530
811455
·011415
810901
811450
811040
811130
8119 10
e11e10,·
819620
8i\39l2
P101i?25
8'139"'1
811500
811590
811-405
811500
e11:::,0
811405
811056
Bl 1530
811110
B!-1530
811500
0
811616
Bl 1330
811730
-0
811210
810946
5
810953
810945
• 81 1200
- - - ---- -- ---- ---
r
('
"
(I
_ .. {f_; 0
·:,:;.-... -. . -.-_.;;:(,::-· ·\i:;9.
:1~iil~i~?1ti)i;~t
0
•
•
~" >"
'm,iLtt'";, t,l:. •
e
0
(
l
l
. . . •.·· ....
l.
- - -
Pi:,CF.
oe .... 2s,-95
;~CT!IJC SYSTF.nS
GPU) ~,-.T!TUDE: 3~.100(: 3517::lo;'fu:;t:~;nuDf.: C•'31•j730 / 0811730
RES.PERSOtl SOUPCE SOURCE
PWS ID SYSTEN'NAME
lio 136338 sourH.'FoREsT:s/D-··
'ii _136339 RMY ACRES,
'11. 136345. CASTLEWOOD. S/D
. '.~)36352;.~~~;::~~~~~~~~~~'·A>·'! L'.':;~---·. H/ · '--j:, ::.':l303Sb· STONEY,•.~QAKS •SUBDIUISIONc•:"·:
:;~f\:·.
TYPE PGP\..lt.-.=.TI □r) WGF:~ P':19i~:C .:";:J~RC<.-t~;~:1E TYPC AVAIL.
C S, i 70482428<'<' lJELL ·
_C_ 350_ 7048619➔~;9 iJELL C .,,,.. '-71:~7o"4s6S"i'ie9 l•JE(L·,-·1::2.
:~'.. ....._ -. -~ ...... :;i_? ··i;·'
. ~ . ~~~t t~A ~ ;;: 6~:g~,::!;t~;~ ~~t~ ! U I ." . ~'·{.;: :i?l }~;;·.:::=-::~·~~~~1l.: ~. \JELl "i.U.1 ~!'
....,;.. ,. . -r:: --·--~·c ·-
G p
G p
G p
c· p·
G· P,
G p ~~
p
COUHJGTON· MHP.
·.:cJ·. ;_._;~;-,_~ :~ •· .·.·• 65,·-;,.-...,:;:.-.._,-.,...?-:.~ _.-I-JELL~ U I -
, '1,~ttf ~1i~~l G p
·c p.
G p
G. p
·G· . p
G p
G p
"" st· .
136393
136386
1,2:a356
[36 106
-13lHOu
195119
13&429
D N RENTALS
HICKORY-CREEK S/D ·. 1.e ... : _e . 1e,·,.,e;...: .::. £ ~-
1:J1neH PF!E591TERit.i! :1;-.::-:::1
/i:Of'llUWLub bt¾i f • .:;--;-...:.: 1U,-. ..:., 1
SSUil Ii" !'.ITS:. r..-,c:c·c-:-c:.· ·3
ROBINWOQD:: LAKE'
136131 'JiLL", RSH' REST
53 136534 CHAPEL"GROVE'ELEM SCHOOL
LG5 te 6:,S16!J L.i"," SC::s::..,
-
136511 Lillb.99E" F:Sil :--.:·:
1365 17 ICM 119FE. Ei::El. 5-: 190L: -
136557. p-1,.-. "CCF-6,",, c-
196558 E!!"IP!:b: SRC1:::·::,:-:-:---E::· :-:::·
t3656e B,115 Il.,J ... F,·.,ulEl,iCi"\·.:--:-··:··
[',"'i'C IF:~I C to• :·
136561 t; ·11 .. E -J ~:.: ,:~:'-':·~;.i.i:·
t;:IAI.C ~5t f; .. I~-I ..
1..,656-11liERIC1 .. 4 F60b 11.",RT ·
136 ... 6 ... LNUl<EL WOC-E:, TI.:;, Ci.:J, • .:..
135555 5-5-sH :10:=E u uc: HL:2 ·
136578 !.~LL. IE:.. 1.-U.:::
195571 t:OSF:T, .. i::11 ." :~1 -
13661::.-
1 ... 66: .
-
e.:1HER .:.,·,;-FI.:.: ,u.-.~H
- --
C GS 7046295321·i.1ELL t:1
C J 65-· ,;:.-_·_:;~ L.IELL u 1
_ .-.;·c-·1·~--· :11
-:-:-
p
-:-:-
-::-
-
. -,--.... , .....
100-7045Bj2'.i i7 t.lELL ·a--:---~.C:..L
1-.:. ---:---,_T-·c
7'57
-
7048666100 1.tELL
:::1.L
··-LL
... :_1_
- -
G p
G p
6
G p
G p
- - -
LATITUDE --------
3St2l0
351145
351436.
351600
3511 ◄5
· · 351200
3s1a-e
351210
3511 JS
351214.
351200
351137
351137
35114➔
351500
351206
3_ 11:::
-
3513-15
351145
3!:i1615
LONGITUDE ---------Bl 1500
B11145
Bl 1516
·811-100
911545
.911000
" 0
811-30 ·
811510
811500
011428
Bl 1500
Bil I I 1
Bl 10S2
811052
011510
Bl 1427
8 I 0796
0
811000
5
0
811'500
0
~l 1500
0
s
- ---
·---
PACE
nu,c;R!D sr-:.;::. tl.•~-'PLiS:..-~c-w::iTEP. 5UP:'='LY ·5'(5fEl"i OE:,'28-95
,'ICTIVE S"(STE11S 0 GP.ID LMl Il"t.:~E, 3~:!C,('(, 3~1720. LONGITUDE; 0810730 / 0811730
0
0
·_O
". PWS ID SVSTEN NAME
: 1:366.:.i.
, .•• ':. 1'"'66'"'...,
, ~··--~ ti 366-5 , .-;::••; 1366~9'
·,;--;_.~ . .;.-·~~ L\1sa6::._2
-'."!" '-. 1966 15
.. , .. ·[36608
136661
-~--~ 13668'?
I .%'.Zn P8Jf_-~~-;-
fh0' rpc:r;~ J'i:'" ~-G_9' r
5n5'fGIUi"i._Unf Fl?;:;;: _:,;:;:-.
EPMP.:ROH,RY .6IRL SEBl:iT_ c:,;1p
IJCP.E .PLi"~ .... =qcs:c_GRP. ::.:-.' -"
11_HEF.9'f~,;:c;:. _es.Ju:\'.._. i,,.-~3;-<_~:-_:_:_ .·.-.· GASt 101.A-CRl~Dl,ICU'~o!-. -
.•• . .. _·.•:· ·tl6866665599-cfifllfrEc'il""tt5'f"-t;HStRe;+-. c_;. '::f~-~-::-:_;~:i~ii_ -1 96.696;
,:, .. :.. · ·:;·J'..196'?69 :.-,_.:;.-~ _...,_-~!:-"i 616.
' ~' ,,e~,5a701,;,· .. , •• "'''--SBSESSSSHESLSESISi0' SS<E+i·,:a,s;;c~ C,
0
•
•
~ 196721.BR08!(LE1611 Sz<.P'I': ... , a:~;-.e1r:
:_,·13672'7 E'."RSGII ;;;:1·c;;.:·e B:,~-~-,·~·.:~0
:---,';_'_. __ -; 196710 llT FISGnll ::.'.F'fIS. ,::; ·
t ... 6'7.:;1 iJ ec .. o .. :c.11--:-1E.h11L CF :::i~-.5'." ...;:T
1367S9 P.BOihlJCJB Ii ,R::E
13616-... CUL lh\:-:o.:.:-, ,.-,a::-.;~ .. ~:..:
1sa,,1 1,u,.11, ni,E _.o,J•
135772 U,HCil R5 cJL Fi:-.: ::;--T
t ... ceo ... e:u,,L.11 IIE,11i:: F .. GE::~-,·-L
. R""S"PEF'SON:·.--..:.~_.-.. SOURCE SOURCE
IYFE PUPU:...=.; ror.;·w□R~ PHCNEt:S:ouRCE::NAME T'i'PE AVAIL. LAT! TUDE LONGITUDE
..........-;-:,.--;-;
+,--". 1 ;-!--•.. ,
-,-;-
-.. -
•. L
-C , -i-L-. :s:
··v_,..,c .. ~:;o
. _,.,.,,·~"""'--'~---"""'""'-""'"'""""" -:;__·f.::,··. ~•---PP------s,~,~,,,~,~o~-~•H1~1~0"'00
G
-0
0
0
s
136015 C&Rl,-R s;:.:.:.,E
136017 H:1155 \::kn 119.
~ ~-"r~c,:~:::=:":-:-_a;.:~=~~c 1 •
•
C
l
l
l
l
L
- - - -- -
___ c .<11
- - -- - -
RECEIVED
SEP 05 199S
SUPEWUN• _ r-t1StCTiO,\
--- -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
Superfund Section Staff
Jeanette Stanleyr / '
Environmental Chemist L./,
NC Superfund Section
DATE: January 2, 1996
Reference 11
Davis Park Road TCE
NCD 986 175 644
SUBJECT: Update on Status of Wellhead Protection Programs in N.C.
I spoke with Mr. Randy Prillaman, Hydrogeologist, NC DEM [phone]. He said that
the Wellhead Protection Area implementation plan written by him and submitted to US EPA in late
December 1994 has been approved. This plan calls for protection of a whole area based on 'a
calculation using recharge rate and pumping rate as variables.
North Carolina now has primacy in approval of wellhead protection areas. None have yet
been implemented. The Rural Water Association is preparing to submit several applications for
wellhead proptection, but none have yet been received or approved.
Some areas he expects to be the first to have wellhead protection areas are Gaston County,
the Town of Black Mountain, and numerous small communities affiliated with the North Carolina
Rural Water Association. Gaston County has delineated wells and completed a contaminant source
inventory.
I
I
I
NORTH CAROLINA
Reference 12
Davis Park Road TCE
NCD 986 175 644
DEPARTMENT OF CQNSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT
·.·-·
J!c;,i"i:ci~,1i?l"'i 'c:i!ii¥~~~/,~''1~il'.\t~~{f o"••t '½•.·.
--,~,::::~:.;:· · · .. :·)\~,:\:_ ... _.:/jff:· -~ .. -·'.:.i:~--~ ?:.i\~:~f~~:I{t{iltI~~~'::.:t~~i~-I(\t·:·
~t-.. ,_
. -::'/,:.."<.".=,
, .. ,·,DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES ,.,.,.. . ...... . . . •'-'"·\•• . .:._,.;,.-,,·,·.
··\i~tjf 1{~~t,?\ ~:-~~~:~,f ~~~"~f cif ~;~~~f ;~{~i[*!f l~w.f:(~~;*ili:, ..
.:,,_:..: '·· <:..
·-?:\(
iiv
1952
. ,._..
41
GEOLOGY A:-iD Grroui;o \YATER IN THE CHARLOTTE ARE,\. NORTH CAROLINA
GASTON COUNTY.
(Area, 35S square miles; population in 1950, 110,S3GJ
Geography 111111 physiog-raphy.-Gaston County lies in the south-central part of the Charlotte arec
Gastonia, with a population of 23,003, is the largest municipality and the county seat. Textile manufac
turi11g is the largest industry in the county although there is considerable fanning activity. The county i
well served by railroads and paved roads.
Gaston County is a rolling upland portion of the Piedmont province, the general altitude being slight
ly more _than 800 feet. Some of the streams have incised their valleys as much as 200· feet below the up
land, and as a result the topography near the streams is quite hilly. Rising several hundred feet above th•
general level of the country are several pronounced northeast trending ridges, all of which are compose,
of resistant quartzite. Prominent ainong these are Kings ~dountain Pinn~cle, Crowclers 1\-fountain, an(
Spencer 1\tlountain.
The county is drained by Catawba River, which flows south along the east boundary. The main tribu
taries of the Catawba flow southeastward across the general trend of the rocks and for the most part _ar,
not noticeably influenced by any differential resistance of rocks to erosion. The tributaries are close!,
spaced, resulting in a fine-textured drainage pattern and the absence of extensive, flat interstream areao
With the exception of South Fork Catawba River, the streams have fairly short steep courses, and conse
quently are rather swift.
Gcology.-Numerous types of rocks occur in Gaston County (Jig. 13), and their relations one with an-
other are complex. The general northeast"schistose structure prevails so that rocks of eastern Clevelan(
County extend northeastward into the western part of Gaston.
Mica schist forms the dominant host rock into which the ·granite ,vas injected in Gasto:1 County. Nat.
urally enoug·h, the granite did not intrude the schist evenly and in a few areas granite is either scant or ab-
sent in the schist. The belt of schist 2 miles east of Gastonia and parts of the schist near Kings Mountair
Pinnacle and Cro,i:ders Mountain contain very little granite. Muscovite or sericite, and quartz are generally
the chief components of the schist although manganese and chlorite are not uncommon.
Composite rocks in which mica schist and granite are interlayered, generally in northeast trendint
belts, are widespread in the western two-thirds of the county. The largest belt in ·which the schist is pre·
dominant surrounds Kings Mountain Pinnacle and extends through the western side of Bessemer C_ity tc
High Shoals in the northern part of the county. The schist is subordinate in quantity to the granite in the
area between Dallas and Stanley and along the Cleveland County line southeast of Cherryville.
Several masses or belts of homogeneous or nearly homogeneous granite occur in Gaston County. Th,
largest of these extends. northward from the basin of South Crowders Creek at the South Carolina line.
through Gastonia to Lincoln County east of High Shoals. One finger of this mass extends southwestwarc'.
to Bessemer City where it is the type locality for Keith's Bessemer granite." Another large mass of gran•
ite occurs southeast of Cherryville.
The granites are not uniform in appearance and mineral constituents. The granite at Bessemer City
is locally more gneissic and contains more biotite than most of the granite in the county. The granites for
the most part have a light color and medium texture, although small bodies within the com9lex proper iire
coarse textured and niay be called pegmatite.
Gneisses and schists, containing hornblende as a prominent' dark mineral, are common in Gaston Coun-
ty. In addition to the numerous lenses of hornblendic rocks interlayered with other country rocks, severa1
large areas of hornblende gneiss occur. One of these, in the vicinity of Beaverdam Creek in the northwest-
ern part of the c·ounty, has been studied in some detail." Soils derived from the hornblende gneiss are gen-
erally dark brown or red in color and are ~ore fertile than those from other rocks.
A composite rock in which diorite and granite appear as intermixed bodies occurs in a general north-
south belt along the eastern border of the county. This belt extends eastward into Mecklenburg County
:r-Keith, Arthur, op. clt., p. 4.
:.Kesler, T. L., Correlation or some metamorphic rocks in the central Carolina Pictlmont: Geo!. Soc. or America Dull.. vol. 5fi.
p. 773, 19H.
figllre 13
~
~
D
□
~
D
QlD -CJ
1,11111111
fR
EXPLANATION
Mica i,i:;hist
Mica schist and granile
schi1t prcdomin•nt
Granite and mica i.chisl
1•toile predominant
Granite
Oiorile .ind granite
dl0f1\t prtdomiri1nt
Granite and diorite rron,te predominant
Hornblende gntl!.s and granite
inttrbin
Hornblende gneiss
Gabbro-diorite
1nd 1Qied buic roe.ks
Quar1zite
limestone
Arran,,m,n\ or u"its. Ont •lx>vt Jh• other. don not
ind.cal• chronoloai(al 1e<iutnu. AR un,ts ••• Pal,o:oic
ire or oldu. Gullca< boundar>u ue 1pp,c,.imllt.
f-" .1 > ... ~.,... sou
GEOLOGIC MAP
OF
GASTON COUNTY
SCALE
0
FIGURE 13.-GEOLOGIC MAP OF GASTON COUNTY.
z 0 "' ...,
~
0 > "' 0 t: z >
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLIN.-\ 49
where it is of greater prominence. The rocks of the complex are not well exposed, and as a consequence
their relation with adjacent rocks to the west is not certain. In this connection, a zone of diorite a~d diorite
gneiss extending northeastward through Lowell is adjacent to the complex and may be. genetically related
to it. South of Mt. Holly the amount of granite appears to be subordinate to diorite but northward the di.o-
rite is subordinate in amount. Pronounced granular disintegration is characteristic of both components of
the complex in the Charlotte area.
Several northeast-trending belts of quartzite occur in the .central part of Gaston County. The ridges
that they form by their resistance to erosion serve to show the broad structural trends of the rocks. In the
area south of Crowders Mountain, Keith" has noted three divisions of the quartzite, namely kyanite quartz-
ite, white, nearly pure quartzite, chloritic quartzite, and seritic quartzite. The beds of quartzite are con-
sidered to be of the same general age, but the relation of one with another is not clear.
Ground 1Yatcr.-Most of the domestic water supplies, many of the industrial supplies, and two of the
municipal supplies in Gaston County are obtained from wells (fig. 14). Most of the water in rural sec-
tions comes from dug wells that derive water from the weathered and disintegrated zone between the soil
and the underlying unweathered rock. Where the unweathered rock lies near the surface difficulty· may
arise in digging a well deep enough to obtain a dependable well. The failure of dug wells is not confined
to any one rock type although attempts to dig wells on upland areas underlain by quartzite are likely to
be unsuccessful.
Records of more than 200 drilled wells are included in the table of well data. The records of 151 wells
were complete enough for use in compiling tab)e 11 below.
TA □I,E 11.-SmrDL\RY OF DATA OX \VELLS IN GASTON COUNTY
(Drilled wells 3 inches or more in diameter)
ACCORDING TO ROCK TYPE
Yield (gallon~ a minute)
Number of Aver:igc
Trri: o, Roe,:: well., Jepth
(feet) Range Average Per foot
of well
Scbii!t .. ··-------------____________ 7J 180 0-150 " . 13
Granite _______ ..... __ .......... ____ ;s 105 0-100 18 .II
All wells ..... __________ ......... _ 151 172 0-150 21 .12
ACCORDING TO TOPOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Pcreeut of wclb
yiddin11: I gallon
11. minute or
leM.
'
'
'
T0ffl0RAl'HTC LOCATION Number of
.,11,
Averago
depth
(feet)
Yield (gallona a minute} Percent of wells 1-----------, yielding I gaUon
Range
Hill .............................. . l3 l'3 I>-45
Flat_ _________ ......... _____ ...... . 143 &-40
Slope ... _ ..... _________ ........... . H 191 1-150
Draw ............ ; ............... . 63 179 2-102
143 I>-"
:-:Keith, Arthur, op. cit.. (Colio 222) p. 5.
Average
. II
18
"
"
15
·Per foot
· of well
,07
.13
, 13
.B
.IO
1 minute or
. les,r.
;
0
0
25
-- - - - -
MAP OF
GASTON COUNTY
SHOWING LOCATION OF WELLS
n ,.229 g1 /
~I
• .?JO
I
.ZJr
I
I
----·-sour-1 --.
0
SCALE
MILES
'
_ _f_Q_U!j r y .. -------
FIGURE 14.-i\IAP OF GASTON COUNTY SHOWING LOC.\TION OF \YELLS
-
0
"' 0 r 0 c; ><
> z
t:J
0 '" 0 C:
7.
t:J
z 0 '" ...,
:,:
0 > '" 0 [:
7. >
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA
Although the wells in table 11 were drille<.l in schist an<.! granite, some of the wells probably. penetr;:
e<.l other types of rocks also. As the spacing between the different rocks can be measured in terms of fe
and inches it is inevitable that many wells pass through rocks other than that indicated at the top of L
well. The schist is composed of 111uscovite and quartz in n1ost places, but it 1na.y contain beds of hor
blencle gneiss and schist, pegmatites, and other rocks.
Table 11 indicates that the average depth of wells in schist is ISO feet and that the average yield
23 gallons a minute; this compares with an average depth of 165 feet in granite and an average yield .
lS gallons a minute. If average yield per foot of well is considered, the water-yielding characteristics
the schist is only slightly greater than that of granite. The average yield of wells in both schist ar
granite is 21 gallons a minute, which is 4 gallons a minute higher than the average for all wells in ti
Charlotte area. It is not certain that the higher yield of wells in Gaston County is significant becau:
the same generai geology and topography occur also in Li_ncoln and Clevela.nd Counties.
The part of table 11 showing the relation of average yield and average yield per foot of well to tl
topography is significant. Wells located on hills have by far the smallest average yield and average yie
per foot of well. In addition 7 percent of the wells on hills in the county yield 1 gallon a minute or less. J
is the case in the Charlotte area as a whole, the wells on hills yield only about half as much water per fo,
of well as wells in draws.
Analyses of samples of water from nine wells and one spring in Gaston County _are given in a tab·
following the well records. All but well 97 penetrated schist or granite or both.schist and granite. \Ve
. 97-penetrated both granite and diorite. The water ranged in hardness from 26 to 158 parts per millio•
The iron content ranged from 0.08 to S.6 parts per million. Water from different wells in the towns ,
Cherryville and Stanley showed a considerable local variation in content of iron.
Analysis of water from one spring is shown in the table. · This water contained only 59 parts per mi
lion of dissolved solids, despite the fact that it flows from hornblende gneiss, one of the !J10st readii
soluble rocks of the Charlotte area. The low mineral content of this spring ..yate'r is thought 'to be typic:
inasmuch as water from springs normally flows through the rocks more rapidly than water froin wells.
Temperatures of waters ranged from 60" to 66° F. and averaged 62°.F. The water havine a temper;
ture of 66° F. is pumped from a well 1,053 feet deep.
There are two municipally owned ground-water supplies in Gaston County; in addition the town <
McAdenville is supplied with water from a well owned and operated by a mill.
Cherryville, population 3,486, obtains its water from eight wells in various parts of the town. All th
wells penetrate granite. The wells range from 132 to 238 feet in depth and from 10 to 75 gallons a mi:·
ute in yield. · Six of the wells yield approximately 20 gallons a minute each. The chemical quality of tb
water is good. The total dissolved ·solids of the water from any of the wells __ does not exceed 115 pari
per million. The water receives no regular' treatment. ···
Stanley, population 1,645, obtains its· supply from four wells. Three of the wells are at least 350 fe,
deep. They·vary in yield from 15 to 45 gallons a minute .. The water from the four wells contains mor
than the ·average amount_ of mineral matter for all wells in the county and is slightly hard; the watE
from well 10 contained 4.9 parts per million of iron on November 20, 1947. The water is not treated.
McAdenville, population 1,059, is supplied with water from a well owned by Stowe Mills, Inc. Th
·. well, 132, is 523 feet deep and yields in excess of 100 gallons a minute. A field test showed· the water ha
a total hardness of 230 parts per million. The water is not treated.
IJWL'JGY A>:D LiHOUND WATER IN THE GHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH (.;AROLINA
RECORDS OF "'F:LLf. lN GASTON COCXTY
Wtll
"·
J.,.,c,._TIU/'I 011"/'fU: D11JLU:lt ! Tyve of
•ell
Omilci SL. or !,louut Hollr-••• Duh Power Co ....... ILL. J.,urr ...•....• Cr-Dr
•.•• do •..•••••• :: ••.. ___ .•.•.•• __ .do .••.. :. __ •••..•• _ •.. do ..•••..•.. ----Cr-Dr
3 ..•. do ••••••.....•.•..•••••••••••• do .•..•••••.••••..•••• do ...•....•••••• Cr--Drf
{ Luci&, 8 milci N. of Mount
Holly •....•..•••..........• ~!rs. W. T. Bralty ..•• Juli1.1,1 H11.Krr ..•••... Cr-Dr
•••• do •••••••••..•••.•.....••• J .. '.. ~ld11t01b .....•••..•....•••••.•••...• Du1
.••. Jo .••••..••••.•....••...•.. W. C. McUll.ollh.' .•..•.•••...... ~ ..•.•••••• Dua:
Sta.nlcy .•••..••••••••••••..•• G. K. Inn ..•....•................•....•. Cr-Dr
8 •••. do .•.•••••..•••..•..••.... H. C. ~[UllJO ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••. Cr-Dr
JO ..•• do ...••...........••••••••.... do ••••••••......•••••• do .••••.•...••.• Dr
II .... do ....•...••••••••.••••.•...•• do •••••••••••••...•••• do •••••••••••. •• Dr
llll .... do ••••••••....•.....•.....•••. do .•••••••....•••••••.•••. · •..••...... Dr
12 •..• do .•••••••....•.. ~ ........ Lola Mills, Joe ••.•••••••••••..••••. : •.•..• Dr
13 •••• do .•.........••••••••••.•••... do .......•.....•••••••••••••••.••••••• Dr
H Aluia, 3 mile, NW of.. ..••...• B. D. B~.ahn •••.•••••••....•....•••.... Dr
15 2mi1esSE.ofHigbShoa.Li •••.•• Ha.rdinMfg.Co .•••••....•....•.•...•••••• Dr
16 llighShoa.Li ••.••••.•...•.••.. Cllrolinia.oMill •.••••••.•••••.•.••...••.•.. Dr
l';' •••• do ••..•••••••••••••••••••••••. do ......••.•...•.. R. E. Fa.w •••••••••. Dr
18 •••. do .•.•••••......•........•.••• do ••.•.....•.•.•••••••••••••••••••••••..••..••
Ill 2 mill"II W. of High Shoal, .••.•• P.A. Kittr. ••.••••••. Va.. M11:b. Co .•••••. Dua:·Dr
20 2¾ mile, W. of Hia:h Sboab.... Mn. M.A. Carpenter •....• do.............. Dr
21 -imilc.aW.ofHigbSboala •••••• A.M.lwtr .••••••... RobbiOJ •••••.•.•.•• Dr
22 •••• do •••••••••.••.•••.••••..• D. C. Ku.er •••• · ••.•••••••• do •••••••••••••• Dr
23 4½ miiet W. of Iligh Sboa.Li ..•• Forre.at Da.llingcr ...••.•.•. do.............. Dr
2~ 6 milu W. of Hia:h Sboa.l! ...... W. E. Kiser •••••••••••••• do •.•••••••••••• Dr
25 4 milra SW. of High Shoal!..... A. L. Bar~.......... Robbiiu............ Dr
26 6 mile, E. of Cherry,·iUc ••••..• F. F. Allen ...•••...••.... do ..••••...••... Dr
27 4½ milea E. of Cherryville ••••. G. A. Bel!. •••••..•••..••.•....•••..•.•••. Dug
28 •••. do .•••••••••.........•••.. G. W. Beam •••••...•• RoLbina .•......•..• Cr-Dr
211 3½ milu E. of Cherryville..... H. R. Beam........... Hickory Pump Co... Dr
30 4 mile:1 E. of Cherryville .•...•• S. C. C&rpeotu ••••••• Coft'ed ••••••••••••• Cr-Dr
31 •••• do •••..•••••••••....•• · ... D. H. C&rpeoter ••••.•• C011tner & Davili .••• Cr-Dr
32 3mileeE.o!Cherryvi.lle •••••.. Mra. VeruPayaour ••.•.•.•.•.•••••••••••• Cr-Dr
33 ..•• do •••••••••••.•••...•..... C. G. Beam ••••••..••. Hickory Pump Co .•• Dr
3t •••. do ••.•••••••...••••.•••..•..•. do ..••..•••••.•••.•.•• do ......•..••••. Dr
3!i I½ mile:1 NE. of Cherryville ....•••. do ....•.••••.•••••..•• do .•••••......•. Dr
36 Cherryville ..••.••..•••••.•..• c~rhou ~lilb ..••..••. Jtol,Liua ••....•••••• Dr
37 •.•• do •••••••••••••••.•.......•••• do •••....••••••••••..• do .••••••...•••• Dr
38 •••. do........................ Caroliua Freight
C•rrkn............ Hid:ory Pump Co... Dr
311 •••• do........................ Rhyo~Haaaer Co ..•••.... do ..•••••••••.•. Dr
40 •••. do •••••••••. · ..••.••••••••.••• do................ ••••••••..•••••••••• Dr
41 •••• do ••••..•••••••••.••..•...•••• do ••.....•••••••••.••••••••••••••••••• Dr
.
Depth
o( well
(fN:t)
2,0
305
36
23
"
" 130
350
500
350
,oo
70
85
80
226
319
3.11
100
160
'°' 78
83
105½
,0
128
"' "
80
121
"
127
100±
22'
100
"' 97
118
300
170
190!
200±
Dia.meter
of wrU
(inc.he.)
" 18
...
Depth of y,·•tcrknl
euioi {fttt ~low
(fttt) RU'f.ee)
n+ ......... .
ao+ ......•...
..
"
120±
18
"
30
25
"
20
..
Yield
(1.p.m.)
6-6
S-10
10
28
15
21
"
30
"
II 60 10-15
5 5/8 ···-···· ···••••••· .•.•••••
5 6/S ' 73 • .• • •••• •• 30-f0
Tot...1 hi.rd-
oca (field
kslt)
(p.p.rn.)
20
50
00
30
"
"
"
"
110
75 ..
50
'°
'°
55/8 •••••.•...•••••.•• li ••••••••••••
5 5/S .: ••••••• -......... 4-5 30
5 5/8 •···•••· •·••••···· 10 60
5 5/8 •···•••• ••••·•···· .••••••• ·····••••••• ~s 24 ade-
3
3
100 '° " 30
5 5/8 •••.••••••••••••••
II •••••.••••••••••••
5 5/S ..••.•••••••••....
5 5/8 ..•..••• •••·····••
qua.le
I
7
'
3.1
25-30
25-30
" 28
20
"
20
IIO
..
'° " "
"
" " " ············
Ruu11n
Granile. Well 1l wa.ttr t..nk.
fu<.
Gr.anit.e. Wti! .t oommi-ry.
Slope.
Not UlleG.
Supplie:1 w.ter lo .chool. furn
.ant! home. Granite. Dr.aw.
Granite. Slope.
Granite. Cood yield reporttd.
Hill
Grr.nile.. Hilt
Granite. Atonetime1upplied
13 familiet and 1everal 1ton:i
Draw.
t12° F. Graoit.e. Ana.ly1ia.
Well i. •l t.nli:. Hill
62½° F. Granite. Analy1l!I,
Well i1 on~fourth mile north
of ta.nk. Hill.
62½° F. Granite. An11\y1i1.
Well ia•SW. of town. Hill.
Granite. Pump telting a.t 150
feet; drawdown rapid but
held at 20 r.p.m. at ISO foot
1ellin,. Slope.
Granite. Well at rei,ervoir.
Hill.
Dye bmm well. Hill.
Scbilt. Formerly~ Ly aaw.
mill; 1-.rge yield reported.
Slope.
Graoile. Uae 6 b.p. pump.
Valley.
Granile. Uac b.p. pump.
dnw.
&bi.at. Uac 10 h.p. pump.
Slope.
Gf1,Jlit.e .. Yallcy.
Dug 61 ft., drilled 011
Hill
Schl,t. Good yield reported.
Slope.
60° F. Schill. Could not
lower lnt.ler kvel with
b.iler. Flat.
Schist. Hill
Hill.
Slope.
HilL
Slope.
Hill.
Wit.er report«! 110ft, with oo
iro11. Hill.
Waler reporkd &0[t. Slope.
Slope.
Hill
Hill.
Wdl 1upplicii 1i1 ho11.1e&. Slope.
Well by wuh houae. Draw.
111½° F. Well 1l we:ot tod of
wute bouae. Draw.
Draw.
61~(' F. Draw.
63}{° F. Dra.w.
62¼° F. Dra'lr.
I
I
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE .-\REA, NORTH CAROLINA 53
RECORDS OF WELLS 1;-,; GAtiTOi'\" Co1JSTY-C1Jt1li1tue(l
Wd! lorAT10S Owsr.11 D1111.u:11. Type of of "di
I I I I Toi~ """'·
RtlURKll I
' Oeplh
no. \ ...-ell (fffl} --------i------1------1---
□i .. tuctrr IDeplh of \\" .. !,:-r i .. ~·,:-1, nru (fielJ
of w,:-ll (:l,.llin~ l(fr-et ~lo• I Yie]J tf'!ll.a)
(inches) I (fr,:t) I~ _,_,_·'_·'_"_;I,. _r_,.._,,_.m_._)__,1 ___________ _
42 Cbr:rr)"'"ille •••.•.•.......••••. Dor:i. Yarn ~!ill.! ..•... Ralph Robbins .••••• Dr 42a ..•. <lo .•......•••••••....••••••••• do .•••••••.. ___ •••••••••• _. ___ ••• _ ___ _ Dr .jJ •... Jo ....•••.........••..•.•. To.,.n .••••••••••.•..• LN: .•••••••.•.••••. Dr 44 •••. ,lo .......••••........••...•.•. do ••...•..•...••••••••••...•••••••••.. Dr 45 .••• Jo .•....••••••.....••••••..... do .•......•....•.•..••••••...•••••••.. Dr
46 .•.• <lo ••••••••••••••••••.••••••••• do ....••••••••••.. I.« •...•.•••.••..•. --------
-17 •••• Jt>.--•·········--·-····-·-.... do·-·-·-··-··"···-····--·······-······.-----·-
~S _ ... du ...••.•. ----······-····-•••• do_·-········-----Robbir11 .•..•••••.•••.•••••• 49 •••• do ..••.••• _ ....•..•••...•••••• do. __ .•• _ •••• _._ .• _ ..•••••• -·.. •• • • . . . Dr
:xi •• _.do .......••• •--········-·-.•.• Jo ••• --···-····---·-·-·······--··-··-· Dr 51 •••• do .•• ____ ._ •••••••. -.•••••• __ .do.-•••••• ·-_. __ ••••••• ·-·-·-···.. •• • • Dr
5'2 ._ •• du .•......••••.... --....•. _ ..• do.··----···-··-·-····-·-············· Dr SJ ..•• do .••... ___ .•••••••.. _ ••••• __ .go.-•••• _______ .••••••• __ .. _. •• . • • . • • • Dr
51 •••• dn.•··-··--······--···· · ••.. ·.do.·-··········-----·······----··---·-Dr SS •••• Jo .••...... •-·······-······ Nu.,..ySpinning Co ... _ R.a.lph Robbina .••••• Dr 56 .... Jo.-.• ····-·-·-······----· •••• do--·········---·· .••• do .. -..•••••.•.• Dr Si .. _.Jo.--•····-··-········---· Rhyoe-HaWln ~Hg.
Co .• •--············ ___ .Jo •••• ·-··-····· Dr 5S ___ .Jo ..••••.. -•-·-·····-···-· ••• _do.--·········-··· ••• _Jo ...••••••••• _. Dr
59 •••• do.•··-·····--··-·····--·-Howell Mfg. Co .•••• __ •••• do.·---·····--·· Dr &0 •••• Jo._._·-··········-······-._ .• do ••••• ___ •.••••• _ Robbin•··--·-----·-Df 61 ·--·Jo .•••• _.-·-·······--····· •• _.do .••••••• -·-·-··· ••• _do .• -••••••••••• Dr 62 ~½ miles SE. of Chcrr)'rille ..• -Tryon School. •••. _ ...•••• do •. -·-········· Dr 63 .••• 1Io •.. ·-··········--··--·-· Fret! lligger3talf .••. ___ --•• do.·---·-···-·--Dr ti~ ._ .. Jo ...•• _··········-······· Ani.lnson Hager.·-···-___ .do .• ·-·-·-··--·· Dr
"
66
68
3}1 miles :-,;w. of llea,,.,mer Cily D. L. IGaer .••••••• __ ••••• do._·-········-· Dr
J mill'S NW. of n-mer City. C. C. Harrelaon •.••••• ___ .do •••• ·--·-···-· Dr
'.!.~1mil,:-, :\\\"."of Uc-mu Cily. R. V. Cuitoo.•···-·-· JUckory Pump Co .•• Dr
J miln \\". of Da!!u .. ---···--· Joe Ho!land .••• --···--·······--···-··-··-Dug
I~{ miles W. nf D11.Uu ••••. _ .••
2 miln SW. of D11llu ...•• ____ •
I¼ n1il<'s W. of Dal!i.1J.-··----·
I znilc SI\'. of Dall:u1 ••......•••
Dal!:u ...•••• _._. ___ ···--·--·
R. E. Summey ••••• -•• Robbins .• ·-·-·-···· Dr E. D. Pa.aour •••••• __ . _ .•• do .......••••••• Dr
County Home ••••••. _·-······-·--··-··-·· Dr . C. S. VincenL •• ______ Robbina .• ____ . ___ ._ Cr--Dr
Moroweb Cotton Mi!Li
Co .• •···--·······-·-······---········-· Dr 7~ !lalf.mile W. of S~ncer
Mountain .••• •···--·-···-·· Sam Love •••• --•····-Ralph Robbioa ...• -. Dr
;5 Speucer ~fouulaio .••• _. _____ •• Spencer Mou11t..in
Mill •••• _ ••••• :.·. __ R. E. F••·--···-·-· Dr ;11 I¼ mile XW. of ~fount Holly __ Globe MilLi, foe .. ,, •• _··-···-····---······ Or
,, ._ .• do •• --·····-··-·······-···-·· 'do •• ·--········-··········-··········· Dr i 8 I mile X W. of Mount Holly __ •• Kendrick. Brick ,I:.
Tile Co .•••• ·•· ••••• _ -········-----·-·•·· Dr ill ••• _Jo ••• •--·················· -••• do ••••••••••••••.• ···········-···-···· Cr--Dr· 80 I mile:-.. of Mouot Holly. ____ • American Y1111, Inc
Nima Plant .•••••••• J. 8. Hinaon •• ----·· Dr
81 J miln :-.. or ~llJ1.Jnt Holly.-··· Duke Powe? Co.
Mouri.t..in Wa.od
Dam •.••••• ••···-·· •••••••••••••• · •.••• Cr-Dr
" 2½ milet X. of ~lount HoUr ••• Duh Power Co.
Supply Yard ••••••• _ H. L. La1er ••• •-··-· Cr-Dr
Mount Holly •••. ·····-·---··· Duke Power Co .•• ···-·-•···~·····-····--· • ··--·-·
2,0
300
''° 200
200±
238
182
!jj
150-200
150-200
132
'" i,o
210
178),<z
\:xi~~
139
90
,0
125
119
15";
142
IZO
330
"
HZ
"' " 82
130
82
'"" 1'3 ..
185
208
70±
5 S/8
8
,.,
0
6 ····--·-····--·-··
5 5/8 •••••••• ·····--·-·
"
S 5/8 ·-······ 100
5 5/8 -······· ······--··
5 5/8 ··-·-·-· 90
5 5/8 ·--~···----·-··-··
5 5/8 ······--
5 5/S ·-······ " 90
s s;s ---···--· ~o 5 5/8 118 H
5 5/8 --······ ····-·--·-
5 5/8
5 5/8
80
I 18
5 5/8 -······· -····-··--·
5 5/8 ·--·---· ·-·······-
5 5/8 ·---··-· ---······· 5 5/8 ;5
5 5,'/1 90
5 5/8 54 29
5 5/8 -----···
,.
30
5 5/8
5 5/8
'
5 5/8
8
3
2
"
!20
102
20
JOI½
14
20
"
62½
18
29?
IO
'° '° 30
25
30
20
20
20-25
20-25
20-25
25
18
10-12
so
IO
" 18
" 20
0
12
18
IO
'
'°
18
"
2-3
....
60
'°
" "
30
"
" " ..
" "
IIO
"
:-{ot used; insufficient tiehl.
Dr .. w.
61° F. Dnw •
On Wt Ma.in Street. Flit.
At old Cherryville Mfit. Co.
Slope.
Analysia. Well ZOO yd1. S. of
Ch,:-rryville Cott.on ~!ill A-
n•l)·ei, in table. Draw.
.4.na.ly1i1. Uoder water Lanie.
Hill.
Attoolhouse. CapPffi. Hill.
At the pump station. Hill.
At t:inlc; in yard. Hill
A11aly1i1. Behind Cannery.
.Slope.
At cannery. Slope.
An1.ly1i1. South of Lank, 011
cannery lot. Drllw.
Near ~u.Way mills.
Draw.
Draw.
Pti.nl 2. Draw.
Pl.ant 2, not useJ; illlluffident
n.tcr. Hill
Company ·well I. Hill
Company well 2. Hill.
Hill.
Schiat. Hill.
Scb.iat. Draw.
Water reported to eootaio iron.
Scbi.tt.
SchL!lt. Large yield, aoft watu
and no iron report«!. Hill.
Sofl .... ter reported.. &hiat.
Slot>('.
Well drilled on gr1mita INl~.
Granite. Hill. •JI
Granite. Good yield reported.
Slope.
GraDit.c. Slope.
Gr11.nite. Slope.
Granite. Hill
Ju•~ ~low top of sharp hill.
Schist.
Qua.rhit.e. Draw.
Uaed by mill 111d village. $lope, •.
Used by roill and vii.la~. Hill
Diori te. Hill
61° F. Diorite. Slope.,
Well not uaed; no waler ob,.
tainc,d. Diorite. Valley.
Granit.e. 8upplim II !~im.
Slope.
Grao.it.e. Hill.
Suppliet J ho~. 83
" 2 roilet S. of ~ouni.HoUy •. ____ Superior Y1111 Milla
•-------------'--T_"_•_-_•~_P_S_,_,_ .. _·~· _R_._E_._,_•_•_ .. _·_··_·_·_--_·,_D_,_...:._'_"_:____c _ __:_··_·_··_·_·~·---_·_·_··_·_··_·;__'_'_.!. __ " __ ,_"_:.._F_ .. _!_,"'_~_.'_'_S,_p~p-li"_'_ill.
I
I
I
I
111
p
' ,
p
' ' ' I]
' '
' '
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA
RECfl}WR. OF \\'r.:LLf; I!\ GASTOX" Col'NT1"-Conti11ued
01rst11 DHII.U'.K Ty~of
"dl
f.-5 2 milell S. of Mount Holly_ ..••. SuprrilJI" Yarn Mills,
Turk-g~ Pl.wt .•• Cuttr ...........•. Cr-Dr Mi 2J..l milt, SW. of Mount Holly __ J. W. Byrd •..•...••.. J. lr. Rol.Uin, ...•.• Cr-Dr Si };ort!i Bt-lmo11t. .••.••••••.•••• Acrm Spionin,i: Ul .••.••••••.•••••.•••.•••• Dr 88 ••.. do ..•••.•••...•••.•....••....• do .••..••...•...••.••••.....••..•••.•. Dr
8Y •... do ..••..•••...••..•..••••.•... do ••.....•••...••.••••.....••....•.... Dr
90 ..•• Jo ..••••..••..••.••. --···· Linfonl Mills, Inc ..... _ ····-··-··-········· Dr 111 -••• do.--------··---··-·---··• Pt-rfection Sp.inning
Co·-·-··--········--···--···----········ Dr 92 ._ •• do.---·-····--······-·--·· F.E. liradaha• .•.• -•• llarlu11:t111 ••••...• __ • Cr-Dr 113 •• _.do .• __ •••. ·-•. --··---· __ .. Stowe Spi1mi11g Co..... Hickory Drillin&
Co .••• --·····-··· Dr
llt ___ .do.•--···--··-····-··--··-•. __ do ..•.••• ----·-··-Robbina ...••..•..•. Dr 95 •••• do.-•• ·-··-···--···--··-·· -.•• do .• ---··-········ Wi11"-·······-····· Dr
· Vi l½ m·1le1 N. of ~lmont.._ ••••• Delmont Abkr ··---·· \'11, ~heh. Co ..•. __ • Dr 1111 I mile NW. of Ddmout •• _--••• South Fork Mfg. Co ... Sydnor We!l Co ..... Dr
99 Delmont. .•.•• _-··· __ •. _._... Cli mu Spinning Co,. ___ .•. ··-·· .••... ·.:... Cr-Dr JOO •••• do .• _····-•• ·-•• ·-··--·-·. S~rlin& Spinning Co... Sydnor Well Co ... _. Dr
IOI ._ •• do.--·-····-···-····--···-Creeccnl Spinning Co .. ············-······· Cr-Dr 102 ._ •• do.--·--············--···· .•• _do •• ·-···--·-···--R. E. F11w .. _ .••..•. Dr
10·~ .••. do ..• ·-···---·-··-··---··· _ ..• do .••.•.• -•-···---····-·-····-····--·· ·er-Dr 105 •. --do.-····-····-··--··--···-·--.do .•••• _____ ·-··-·-····-·-····-·····-· Cr-Dr
106 ._ •• do.--•-········-····-··--·· Imperial Yara }.!il!s.
Inc ..••... __ ·-······ Kirlley.•-········· 10; ..•. do .. __ •. ··-·----•. _···-· ••••.. do ..•• ·-••• __ .•. _. _ .•. do. __ .•• _ .... __ . 108 •••• do_.·-····--··-····-···--· ..• _do··-····--··--··· ·--·-····--········· IOll •••. do._ •••.•••. _ .•. __ ••• -··· ..••. do_. ___ ••.• _···--•.• ··-·-..•.. -· .. _ ..• 110 •.•• do.·--········--···-···-·-Montt,dl kc d: Fuel
Co .•• _ •••• -•• ·-···. _. --·. ··-.•••• ·---·. 111 •.•• do .•. -•••••• ___ •• -·······--··.do ••• -••.• _ •.• ·-·· ··-__ .••••..•. ·--••• 112 I mile S. of Dclmoot._._ .•. _ .•. Henry Lioekrg"r
P. W, Muaa (Teuant) ltot,bin1 •.•••• •--·-· I 13 1¼ milt11 S. of Delmont •• · .•••• _ Mr. Mathe~n---·-··· ••• _do .•••.••. ---··· II( l mile SW. of l:lc:lmonl ••••••••. Mia Florence Abe-e
R. L. DrooU
(T ~naot) __ -•• _ .• ··-_ ..• do. ___ .. _. -... _. 115 4 miln SE. of Belmont. .• _ •. ___ W. G. Dr.,nnan. -···-· .... do·--····-···-·-l l6 ._ •. do •••••.• ·-····-···-······ J.M.Bowen
s. D. Benfi.,ld .••..... _._do ••• ·--········ lli I¼ mil~SW. or Belmont.._ ••• fAlt'le Yarn Mi~ .••... Win" (t) ...•• •--··-118 I½ miln SW. of Cn111uton.... II. R. Lane---·---··-· Durri•-···--·····-··
Cr-Dr
Cr-Dr
D,
Cr-Dr
D,
Cr-Dr
D,
D,
D,
D,
D,
D,
Dug-Dr
1111 2 miles\\'. of Cnmerton •••• --. W, S. Quinn •• ·-·-·-·· Robbina ___ •••••••·· Dr 120 •••. do ••..• ·-·······-········-Arthur Su1g1 ••• -•••..•••• do .••• ·-···-··-· Dr 121 ( miles SE. or Gu!onia •• ··-··· Pbut11.1ion Pile .• __ .••. Hamiltor1 .... _...... Dr 12'! 1%' mile= ~W. of Cramerton •••. L. W. Farin .• ·-······ lU]ph RobUiD1 .. _ ••• Dr. · 12J .•.• do .•• __ ·-__ •• -· •• -·····-.. Church of God .•• -· •.•. __ ····-· -·--····-.. Cr-Or 124 •.•• do .••••••••. •··-···-···---W. E. MitchelL. __ ••• Ralph Robbin, •.• __ . Dr
125 ••.• do_······-···-···-········ •••. do •.•••••• ·--····· •.•• dD ..••..•• •-···-Or 126 •••. do ••• -·· •.•••. -··......... W. J. Shncr .•• ··-•. -· _ .•• do .•• ---··-····-Or 127 •••• do .• ·-···········-········ Jl. Q. McAteer •• _ •.• _. --.~do .•• •-····-···· Dr
.
128 •• -.do ••• ·-··········--······· Re-tee BraDdon ••.•••• _ ·-···-·····--······· Cr-Dr
Dtptb
of well
(fttl)
" '" 193
300
300
'" ,00
" 300
3'0
"'
170
375
100+
132
128
I IS
"'
"' 160
I03
"
80
100
112½
"
" ii½
H2½
"' 39
105
72,Vi
500
55½
83
IOI
83
" 121
39
Di11n,~kr
of •ell
(incliea)
2
'
8
~µtL of
o.aiuc
(fe-et)
II(]
J0-8-6 ~5 (of
10 inch)
' IO
8
3
10
IO
3
60
"
llO
80
80
I
W1t.kr H:vel
(fttllodow
1wf~)
23
<O
···--··-35 torn
35
' 3
' 3
5 5/8 ··-····· 6 5/8 iO
S 5/8 4P
5 5/8 •..•••.•
5 5/8
8
IH 31 22.40
5 5/8 ••..••...••...•...
Yield
(r.p.m.)
10+
' IO
30
"
35
oo·
Z½
"
' 12-15
"
116
60
I½ •
12
'
3½
3½
'
II
30
"
" "
" '
" 27
2-3
5 5/8 50 15
B ······--···--··--· 100
5 5/8 ·····--· ········•· ···--···
Tola! h».nJ.
11nr.a (ticJJ
ta~)
fp.p.m.)
'" "' "' "'
60
"
" 60
80
60
60
-·-········-
60
" 60
30
... ···--···-
'°
·-··-·······
·-··········
·-······--·· ··--········ 75
,0
" -···········
····-·······
"
" "
35
'" ''°
25
" 30 ••
R[wun:a
Schiai. \'-.Iler.
"''· 62° F. Scl,ist. Hill.
63° F. &hist. Comf)llny well
2; uorth 1ide of plaot. Dru·,
SehUt .. Comp.,.ny well I: ~ ... t
end of mill. Hill.
l'l2J{° F. &hilt. Slope,
63¼° F. Schir.t. Slop-,.
Scl,ial, Hill
66° F. Schill. Well ir. crool,:.
c-d and turbine eau't be act
lo•er than 8.5 ft. 90 pumps
011\y 35 g.p.m. Slope.
Schiat. BthiDd church. HiU. Schiiit. Yielded 60 gallo11s J.l('r
mioute when drilled. Ora"'
Schist. Slope.
Draw. Analyaia.
ll4¼° F. Schiat. Pump~t
to yield 46 11:.p.m, Draw.
Schiat. Ridge.
Schiiit. Yielded 18 11:.p.m.
when drilled. Draw.
62° F. Schi1t. Hill.
Schir.t. Well ahandoned; not
enough wllcr. Hill.
Schiit. 62° F. At _upper tnd
or"milL Slope.
Across road from mill. Slope.
&:hiat. At lo•er end of mill.
Slope.
Schiat. Hill.
Schist. Slope.
Do.
Schlat. Drall',
Do.
Do.
Schbt.
Granite. Slope.
Supplies llI house,. Draw.
Schilt. !rill.
Schi,t. Slope.
63° F. Schist. Draw.
Schist, Dug JI feet. Roclr: is
fine grain«!; green to rray
1chist. Hill
GnoHc. Slope.
63" Ft Grauite. Hill.
Schi•l. Slope.
Hill. 2 ·-······ ••••••.••• -··-···-·-·······-·· Supplieii II houaea. Hill. b 5/8 ···-···· ······-··· ½ ······-····· Scb'11l. Not ua«f; Dot enough
5 5/8 60 Ji
6 5/8 •••••••..••.••••••
5 5/8 82 22
,o
3
wakr, Slope.
·····--····· Slope. • ••.•••••••• Slope.
A well ~ feet deep, &O feet
from well 127-Yicldt l pilon per minut.e. Slope. I½ ...•....•••. ·Sort w,kr. Slope.
I
' I
I
GEOLOGY AND GROUND \YATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA
Rt:cuuos OF WE:us 1x G.\STOX CouxTY-Co11tinued
I ' \\'t!I i
nn. i
12'J
130
IJI
13:!
2 mill':S SW. of Crllmtrlon .••••• T. Hor,c-.•.... __ ______ Ralph RoLl,iu,...... Or
..•• do .••........•...•....•... L. C. llouJ ..•.•.••••..•• Jo .•..•.•.....•• Dr
•••• do ••.•••..........•...•.•..••. do .•.•.••••.••••••.... do .•.••.••.••••• Dr
~lc.\dcnvillc ...•••.•.•.•...•.. Slo...-r ~lill!. Inc .•••••• llid,or}· Pump Co .•• Dr
IJJ •.•• Jo .•••••..••••..........•...•• Jo ........•..•.... Rohl,in, ....•.....•. Dr
134 ••.. do ....•....•••..••••....••.... do .•..........•... (?) .•.•....•••.•.••. C'r-Dr
Jf mile E. or l.owdl. •.•..•.••• Dr. J. W. n~id
Drpth
of well
(fe1:t)
Diame!fr
of well
(inchl"3)
Derth ) Watrr leveil
ca.:iin<s ([t"et hclow
(fee() aurface)
j Total h&rd• I
. neM (field
Yield i lra1t11)
(g.p.w.) t (r.p.m.) ------1
~; .5 5/8 :15
66 55/8 50 S
JU 55/8 _80 0
10·8 60 "
"' 5 5/S .•••••••.•••••••••
100+
11
230
Slope.
Schist. Hill.
Schiit. Xot uae<l.
Hill.
63H° F. Supplies.
town. Slof)C.
Schist. l."!a.l only
gcney. Slope.
Schiat. li,cJ only
gcncy.
55
Xo water.
mills and
in cmcr•
in emcr•
I 136
JI. T. lb.wk (len11n1). Ralph ltol,l,in.1 •...•. Or
Lowrll ....•...•••............ J. Il. llu,hou .••.••...••....••...•....•.•. Dr
32 I Schist. Dra'II'.
Suprlie, 35 hou~l'S lntl ~cver:i.1
buainc$l;('S. Dr:i.w.
137
I· !JS
"'
•••• do .•.•..•...•......•.......••• do ..•.•.••••••••••.•••..••...•.•....•• Dr
•.•. do •.•.......•.....••...•••.••• do .•...••••........•....••..•••••••••• Dr
I
I
t
ti
I
I
llO I mile SW. of Lowell ...•..••••• \\' . .\. Froucl>erier. .... Jb.lrh Rol,l,in1 ...... Dr
Ill •••• do •••••••••••••••••••••••• Setur'1Camp •...••..•••. t.lo ......•..•.••• Dr
112 2!-i miles E. of Gastoni&. •..••• G;utnn Counlry Cluh .•.... t.lo.... .•••. •.•.• Dr
113 •••• t.10 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Jo ..••................ t.10 •••••••••••••• Dr
1-H 2milc!E.nfGaiitonia1 .•••.•.•• Akel"ll:'--lotorLinesCo ..••.• do .••...••..••.. Dr·
115 3!-• miks :-iE. or Cll.lltor,i;,1 •••••• A. ~I. Sn1yre Mfp: ....•. R...lrh llnhhins ...... Dr
116 •••• Jo .....•......•...•••......••• t.10 •••••••••••••••••••• t.lo ••••.••••••••• Dr
Hi 4 mi!n SE. of Gu~oni.i...... .• n..nln :'-,lfg. Co ...••.•...•. do.............. Dr
I-IS •... do ......••••••...•.....••• Tc1tilr!, Irie.
Pfr,eill:i Plaut. ••..•. Sydnor Well Co..... Dr
HO ..•• do .••... ~ ...•....••.......•••• do .•••••••••••••.• Ralph Robbin, .••... Dr
150 .... do .•••••••...•....••.•......•• t.lo .•...•.••.........•• do ••••.•••••.••• Dr
U\ I .... Jo ....••••..•••....••.......•• do.~ •••••••••••••• Va. :'--heh. Co .••.•.• Dr
I
152 •••• do .•••••.....•......•.....•••• do .••••••.•••...•••••••.•••••...••.... Dr
153 ..•• <lo .....••••••••...••....•• Ru Spinnir11r; Co ..••••. Ralrh Robliins ....•• Dr
154 •••. do •••.•••...........••...••••• do .•••••.••.....•••••• t.lo....... •• • • • •• Dr
15.~ •••. do .•••..••..••....••..•.••.... do ..............•. (7) ••••••••••••••••• Dr
131) 2! '! milcd '.'i'E. or t:H1011i:+....... Grove~ Thread Co..... Ralph Rnlilii11!...... Dr
15;" •••• do ••••••••....•...•.....••..•• do ..•••.........•....• do •••••••.••...• Dr
I.SH •••• dn •••...•.....••..••••.••...•. <lo .....•..••.•.•••.... t.10 •••••••••••••• Dr
1:i~ ••.• <lo .•••...•..••••••••••••••.... do ..............••.... do .•.••.•••••••• Dt
100 .••• <lo ••••••••.•••••••.•.•....•••• do ...•...••.. · ....••.• do ..•.•....•..•• Dr
· 161 .•.• do .••.•••••...••..••••..•.•••. do .................••• do ..•••.....•.•• Dr
162 ••.. Jo •....•••••••••....•.•....••• do ..••••••••••••••..•• do ••••••.••..... Dr
163 •••• do ••••...••.•••••••.••.. :. F1int :'-,l(lf. Co ..•..•..•...• do •••....•••••.. Dr
IIH ••.• do .•.••••••..••••..••..•••••.. do ...••...•.••..••.••• do ••••••••••.••• Dr
IM .••• do ••••••••••••••••••••••••.••• do ..•••.••••...•••••.• do ..•••...•••••• Dr
160 I?,. miles :-1. of Ca.5toni:.. .....• C. A, Barkley .•••••••.•••• do.............. Dr
1117 r.~tnnia ••••••.. ·~·-·········· Grcntori Milb .••.••••• (?) ••••••••••••• ~ .•• Dr
1611 .••• do •.••••••.•••••..••...••• S1Jnri~ Dairy .•••••... Ralph Robbin1 ..••.•• Dr
. 169
1-;0 · fiutonia ••••••.••••.••••••.•. Sunrise o..iry ......••• Ralph Roblii11a ...••• Dr
I mile S. of C:utonill ...•••••..• Tutilet, Inc.
&minole Plant. ......•••••••••••..••.... Dr
::.! ! . '. ~:d:'.~e~ .~~ ~~ .~~~~~~~~: ::: :: . ~.u.7o.~~~~~ .~!~~::: :: : ::: ~ :: : :: ::: ::::: :: g;
li3 : .••. Jo •...••••..•••.•..••••..•.... do ..••.•••..•.•••••...•••.••••..•••... Dr
-~---I
100
100
l.'iO
" "
105!-j
llO
"'
"
i;"S
500
200
130
191
'146
" 90
"' 132
60
69½
" '" IJ3
265{?}
IJ6
00
120
13'
"' '"'
5 5/S 5-5
5 5/8 ..•••..• '
5 4111 ;5 26
,5 5/8 .••..•......•.....
6
5 5/S
5 :i/8
"
"
HI.I.
38
16
"
5 5/8 ·•••··•· ···•••• •••
5 5/8 ··••••·• ••·••·••·• s 5/B s; so
5 5/8 .•••••••••••••••••
5 5/8 ••••••.• •••••·••·•
5 •••••••• ••••••••••
6.
6
6
6 5/8 .•.•.•..
6 6/8 •••••••. ••···•••••
6 6/8 ...••... H
6 5/8 Iii 28
"
6
"
"
30
30
"
ll
60
20
32
20
18
ll
"
20
,0
10
102
10
10
18
15
llO
" 15
"
" 12
12
11
8
30
20
30
15
21
'
35
30
············
············
__ .? _______
80
············
50
............
············ 115
" ............
............
············ ············ ............ .,
............
30
" ............ ............
............
............
30
············ ............
Not in \l5C. W•tu reported
to be h1.rd. Dr•"·
Do. S!ope.
Schist, Slope .
Schi,t. Water rcriorte<l to be
corr011ive. Dra'II'.
Schiat. Draw.
Not utcd; not cno1J1sh 'll'atcr.
&:hist. Slope.
Schist. Slor,e.
2 nther aimilar 'll'elL! at mill
and Tillu;c. Fbt.
Yielded 27 galloua a· mi111Jte
when drilled. Hill.
Dra'II'.
Not used. Te,ted at 65 g.p.m,
when drilled. Yield ,,.
crea.,ed " 20 g,p.m. when
1ba11donN. HiU.
Schi1t. Not u,ed; capp<:d.
Hill.
Schist. Not lllle<l; Ca['lpet.l.
Draw.
62½° F. Schiat &nd qua.rt1ite.
Drt.'11'.
SchUlt. Yieltled 25 to 30g.p.m.
'll'htn drilleJ, Dra.W".
Schint. Hill.
Schi,t. AbandonN "==
'll'&ter became muddy. DraW"
Hill.
Gnrnite. Water oUt..i.iued at 80
fttt. DraW".
61½° F. Granite. Dra'II'.
Gl'llite. Draw.
Granite; w,u •• re1111rvoir.
Dr••·
Gn.nite·. DraW".
Granite. Dra'II'.
Granite. Hill.
Granite. Dn.• .
Do.
Do.
Supplic,1 !I boU11C11. Sch Ult.
Slop,,.
Schiat. Draw.
SchUlt. Water obtained at ;o
feet ~lope.
Granite. Dn.W".
Granite. Slope.
&2° F. Grlluite. Dn.'11'.
Gr1.11ite. Dn.'11'.
Granite. !Jill.
I
jJ
:!
~i J:. ,,
·!i
I
J
'.\
ti
I
rl
56 GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE A.REA, .NORTH CAROLINA
REC'Olllli:i OF '\\"t:LLS IX GA:.TOX Cuexn.·-Continucd
\.\'cU f,oc,1TION O•o1ifl D11rLU:1t Tyf>!' of "· •eH
174 Hi milee S. o( Gul.onia •.•••.•• Te1tik1, Inc. o.«.ot. Pl.r.nL •••••••••••••••••••••••••• Dr
175 I½ milca S. of Gul.onia......... Di1011 Mills........... fulph Robl,io1 ...••. Dr !in .••• do .•••....•••••...•••..••..•.. do ...••..••••..••...•• do •••.•••..••.•• Dr li7 2 mile, S. of Gu!ooi:. ...•.••..• Tntilea, Inc.
Victory Pbnl. .•••.• ····-············~--Dr
171:1 2½ miles$. o[_Gulouia •..••••• Tutile., Inc.
Myer1 Pl.lot. .••••.• Ralph Rol.t.iiu •••.•. Dr 17Q ..•• do ....•••••••.•••..••••••••..• do ••••••••••.••••....• do ••••••••••••.• Dr·
180 •••• do •••...•••.•••..•••••.•••.••• do •••..••••.•••••...•• do ••...•••.••.•• Dr 181 2¾ milea S. or Ga.stonia ..•••.•• Rn•funover Milla, Inc.
(HaooverPlaot) ..•••... do .............. Dr
182 •.•• do •.•••...••..••••...••••.•..• do •.•••...•••.••.. Ware ..••..••.•.••. Dr 183 ..•• do ••••.••...•••......••.••.... do ...••....•...••• llol.,t.,iua .•..•••...•. Dr 18,1 3½ miles S. or Gaaio11"1a........ Textiles, Inc,
Ridge Plant. ••••••••.•• do.............. Dr JBS ••.. do ••..•••.•.••.••....•..••..•. do ••..•••..•••..••..•• do .••. · .•••.•••• Dr
186 2½milesSE.ofGuloriiii..a •..• J.A.Ur1cuh1w ..••.•••••. do •.•.••... ; ••.• Dr 187 3½ milea SE. or Ga.stooia.. •••• Rol>C"rt M. Brandon ••..••• do.............. Dr 188 •..• do •..••••..••.•.•.••..••.• H. R. Kendrick .••••.•••.. do.~ •..••..•••.• Dr 189 Gutonia ..•... : ••••....••.••. Fircatone Milla, Inc .•..••.. do ••..•••...•••• Dr
191 ••.. do •••....•..•.••...•...••••••. do •.•.•...••...••...•. do •••••.••...••. Dr
102
193
•... do ...•.••.•••••..••..••......• do •.••...•••.•••.• Guy Robbins .•.•..• Dr ••.. do •••...•••..••••..•..•••••••. do................ .. • . . . . • ••..•.. •••.• Dr
194 •••• do ••••....••...••...••..•••••. do •••.•••.•••.•••.••.•.•.••..••..•••.• Dr 195 •.•• do .•••••..•.••••••...• · ..••..•• do .••..•••..••••.• Rol>bina .••..•..•••. Dr lll6 I Vi mifu \\". of Gutonia....... Par:O:dale Mill, lnc .•..•••.. do.............. Dr 19i •••. do •••••..••..••••..•....•.••.. do ...•••••••.•••..•••. do •••.••.•••.••• Dr 198 •••. do •••••...•••..••...••.••• Bloom itiJ;a, lac ..•.•••..•••.•••••.••..•••.• Dr HIii •••• do ..•••••..••••.•••..•...• Tutiks, Inc, • Arliugtoo PIM.ot. ••.•..•••..•••••.•..•••• Dr 200 2 milea W. of Gaatonia .•••.•••. Threads, foe .•••.••••• Rot.,l.,illll ••••.•..•••• Dr 2(11 •••• do •...••••...•••••••...••.•.•• do ..•••.•..•..• • •• J. S. Hinton........ Dr 202 •••. do ••••..••...••••.••..••••••.. do •.•••••.••..•••• Rot.,bi1U1 •••..••..••. Dr 203 •.•. do •.....•....•••..•....••.•••. do ...•••... ~ ..••.• J. S .. Hinaon .••..••. Dr 204 •.•. do .••........••.•.••...••.•... do ..•••...•...••.••... do .•.••••.•...•• Dr WS 2¼ milca \\'. of G.uton~ ••..••• Teitilca, Inc.
Myrtle Plant .••.•••.• ." •...•••.•••..••.• Dr 206 I¼ milca SW. of G.utonia .•••• Clyde Bradford ..••..• Ralph Robbins .••••• Dr 20; •••• do ..••••..•.••.•••..••.••• D. "W.Dawn •••.••..••.••. do ..•••••.••.••• Or
203 .••. do ...•••..••..••••.•••..•• 0. L. Rhyne •••.••.•••.••. do •••...•...••.• Dr 209 2½mi!uX\\'.ofGutonia ...•. O.R.J,nldn.t ...••.•• : .••. do ...•••..•..••. Dr 210 ••.• do ......••..••...••.•••..• M.B.Jcnkina ...•...•••••. do ..••••.••...•• Dr :!II •... do .••...••...•...••..••..• D. L. Wyont .••..••.••.••• do •...•••..•..•• Dr ~12 •••. do ...••...••..••••.••..••. J.frond.cri.er •••••••••.•• do ••••.••..••..• Dr 21J 3¼ mib XW. ofGaatonia ...•• D. G. Burns. •••..•..• Va. M.ieh. Co ..•••.• Dr 21,1 2 milcs.E. of lJCll.$Cmer City ..••. IUlpn Spinuing Co ..••••••.••••••••.•••••• Dr
215 ..•. do ...••••.•••..•••..••..•.•••. dn .•.•••.••...•..• Ralph Robl,ins .•..•• Dr
216 •.•. do ..••••.••...••••..••.••..••. do ••••.••..••.••.••• ·.do •••••••.•••.•• Dr
2ii l¼ miles E. of ll~mtr City .•• !Jul Machiue Sliop •.• Rl,,Jr,h Robbins ••.••• Or
,,
Deplh I
o( '"11
(fttt)
122
18'
"
135
I iO
103½
120
180
26i
140
18'
120 .,
" J.I
80±
21'
125
!<5
!Oi
92
(I)
180
210
OS
160
105
490
i6½
◄90
(!U0-]000
160
" M½
100
100
]10½
77
132
110
271½
168
23!!½
!JO
Di.t.mct,•r Der,Lh of
of •cU e&11in1
(iochca) (fed)
f, f,/8 ••••.•.•
5 6/8 ••••••••
\\"at~r level
(fc-et l.,clow
11.!tface}
" 10
5 6/S .~~.~ •••..•••.••• :
6 6/S ••••••••••••••••••
◄O
112
5 5/8 ..••.•••••• · .••..••
5 5/8 JS 10
5 5/8 •••••••• ••••••••••
5 5/8
5 5/8
5 5/8
'
' 5 5/S
5 5/8
'
S 5/ll
5 5,'B
5 5/fl
. 5 5/8
S 5/6
'
5 5/8
27
◄O
27
100
100
◄◄
13
2◄
, 13
10.2
10.6
5.0i
"
10
flO .•••••.•..•
38
35
........
" <O
I>±
80
106
I IO
31
20
··········
" ··········
50
27
Yield
(g.p.m.)
35
16
"
5
16
20
. 30
'
20+
'
8
◄O .,
44
80
20
16
33
15
12
10
" 8
18
10
2
12
15
10
8
10
' " "
'
50
12
12
Tou/ lard·
n_.. (field
tat.!)
(p.p.m.)
3l
3l
20
35
◄O
" ············
" 20
" ............
············
-···········
"
35
JO
35
20
" " " <O
00
Granit".
Hill.
Granil'°,
Do.
Grani!c.
g.p.m.
Dra•.
Origi11.1Uy yieldrd 25
Fbt.
Granite. WclJ •t mill. Fbt.
Ol,½° F. Grauitr.. OtiRina!ly
yi,lded 21111:-P,m, Dr-a.-.
Granite. Well in ,it:~~e. Hit!
62½0 r. Grar,ite. \\"dis IS!
182 anti 1S3 8upplr w~ttr
for p\aol and viJlage. Ana]y.•
aia of water fro1n we!] 182
in bble. Temprr:iturt 11;,U
182, 64° F. .
Granite. Dra..-.
Granite. Dra-.r,
Granite croris out !,O rc~l from wdl. Hill.
Grani!c. Draw.
&:hiiit. Flat.
Schist. Fbt.
Granite, W1tlnreJl/>rt,·,:'lOrt.
Draw.
Granite. Well l; not i" 115t.
Draw,
Granite. Well 2; nut i11 ,~.
Draw .
Granite. Well :J. Or .. .,·.
Well 4; nol in ust, (;r~nite.
Draw.
Granite. Wdl.'i Dr,,., ..
Granite. Wd16.
Granite. Draw,
Or1i1ite. Sl"r~.
6i}'.1° F. Granite. 11:11.
62J.<,"" J'. Grnnite. H;il.
Granite. Kut iu use. Dr~.-.
Granite. Abu1dooed. Duw.
Gr&nite. Kot in u~e. Slnpc, 6~,f' F, Gr;rni\r.
Granite. Dni.w.
Granite. Slor,,.•.
Gran·1tc. Slope.
Granite. Supp!i~s ' hou~,.
Slope.
Granite. Hill.
Granilc. !!ill.
Granite. Hill.
Slope.
Sur,p!it'.s lar,!.~ farm. iih;•·.
Schist. OhJ wd) iu firl:l. ~~•.
u&e:i. Slope.
62J;° F. Schist. Curnp~nr
wrlll. Drnw-.
Company wrll (at ~hro!
hou1~). Ifill.
Schiat. Draw.
:l
i
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN nu: CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA
REcomi::; OF \\'n.t::. I:-; c.\fl•ro;-; Coc;x-rY-Continued
\\"ell !
no. I '
Lo<:ATIOS' Ow . ..-r.tt DRJLLtR
219 B~mcr City ........•••••••• Algodon Mfg. Co .•••..•••• do •.••••.......• Dr
219 •••• do .•••...•..•.....•..••••• Ou.gc :.trg. Co .••••••••.•••••••••••.•...•• Dr
220 IH milu SE. of Bc:,:icmcr City.. L.A. Wolfe .•.•••••. __ Ralpti Robl,ios .. ;... Or
221 2 miles SW, of Bcsumcr City ... R. L. Lc'll'iJ D•iry .•.••.•.. do ........•.•••• Dr
:!22 2½mi\e-sSW.oflloi1c111crCily. Pine Grove Grill ••..••••.• do ..•........••• Dr
223 lmileNW.ofKingsMounhin •. EarlcE.C•rr~ntcr •.••.... do .•••••••...... Dr
:!:!~ :-Ofountain Vic .................. Frie<la Mfg. Co ...•..•••..........•...•.••• Ong
:!:?,5 •••• Jo .•..•••....•.......•.•.••... do ...•...••••••...••..•.•..•..•..••••• Dug
:?:?8 .... Jo ....•••••••.......•...•. R.H. Hook ..••.•••••. Ralph Rolihina ..•••• Dr
:?2i .. ,.do .•...••••••........••... Harver Flume .••••••••••. do •.•••.•....••• Dr
2:?S H mile NE. or Mountain
\°iew •••••••••••••....•... ., Mrs. Eure Rol>ertL... ••••..••••••••••.... Dug
229 2H mi!u SE. of Mouolain
Yiew ...............•.•••••• A. L. Dial. .....•••... Ralph Robbio:, .••••• Dr
230 · 3 111i!e1 S. of Mount11.in View •••• J, A. Stroupe ••••..•..•••.....•.......•••• Br
231 t)1 milrs S. of Mountain View .. Wilson an,J Drown ••••..•••••••••••....•.•• Or
:?32 Smiles S. of Cutonia.......... T. L. Hovi1........... Ralph Rolibina...... Dr
:?33 S 1/3 miles S. of G1U1tonia •••..• Enn Brandon •••••••••••. do ...........••• Dr
234 6 miks S. ofGutoroi ............ C. E. Honeycutt ••••••••.• Jo •••••.•••..... Dr
2;1.5 •••• do ...••••••••••••••••••••. W. L. Hutchison .••••• Tom York .••••••.•. Cr-Dr
2:111 i mi!e1 S. o[ C:ut.onia ..•••••••• Tom Sparrow ••••..•..•••••••••••••.•....• Dug
23:' iH milea S. of Gaalonia .......••••• do •••••....••••••• Iulph Robbin1 .•••.. Or
23S 4¼rnilc1SF..nfGaatoni• •••••• Carroll Kerr .••••..••.•••. do .••.•.......•• Dr
239 4!i' miles SE. of G11.1tonia •••••• W. S. Torrence
Fairview lliiry ••••••.... Jo ••••••••.•.... Dr
'.!10 ...• do ...•.••••••••.....••...• Gutonia Airport •..••• U.S. Army ••••..••. Dr
2H S!i 111ilr1 SE. of Gaatooia .•••.• Sandy Plain Church ••• Tom York .....••••. Cr-Dr
2fl 6Jf mi!,•1 SE. of G11.1tonia.. •..• D. F. Harri,on .••....• George Stephenron .• Cr-Dr
Drpth
nf •di
(feet)
116
160
IMH
100
<I
17
IOI
g;
s;
13i½
"
70
108
" JOO
90
OJ
125
00
150
102
00
"
Diameter
of •ell
(lnche1)
Dr11tb of Water lnel
e:a.sinit (f,:,:t !,,,:low
(f«.t) Jud:ite)
5 5/8 H
50
5 5/8 62 Si
55/8 m 65
5 5/S •••..••••••••.••••
5 5/11 80 50
24 H 37 .os
2t 1;' 6.50
5 5/S ••••..•• 61
5 5/S 56 "
JO 0 80.!18
5 5/8 ·••····· ••••••••••
12 .f6.22
6 " 5 5/8 ···-···· 48.00
5 5/8 ••••••.•••••••••..
5 5/8 ·•·····• ·········-
2 40 48
36 61 56.25
5 5/8 ·••····· ..••••••••
5 5/8 ••••.••.
5 5/8 ••••.•••
6 · iS ..
21
" 15
Yiel.J
(g.p.m.J
"
IS
<O
16
"
········ IS
25+
50!
········
4-5
15
15-20
"
IO
,0
4-5
5
Tot.al hard•
or,,,, (field
le,st.t)
(p.p.ro.)
" <5
" ············ ··-·· .......
" 20
············
" 20
" " 20
20 ............
" ············
20
JO
············
············ ·····-···-··
A:iALYSJ-:S OF GROUXD WATER FROll GASTON COUNTY,• N. C.
(Numbers at heads or columns correspond to numbers in table or well data)
(parts per million)
9 JO
Si!icia (SiOi) •••••••••.•..••••.• 32 20
Iron (Fe) •••••••••••••••••••••• .23 ,.,
Calcium (Ca) •.•••••••••••...••• H 31
M1&T1t:11ium (M1) •••••..•••..••• 3. 7 5.0
Sodium and pot.aaium (NA+K) .• II '·' Carbooate (CO,) •••••••••••••••• 0 0
Bi~bonate (HCO,) ••••••..••.•• 160 124
Sulfate {SO,) ••••••••.•••..••••• ,. 7 IO
Chloride (CI) •••••••••...••••••• 7.0 2.5
Fluoride (F) •••••••••••••••••••• .3 .2
Nitrate (NO,) •••••••••••.•••••• ., .0
DUIIIOlved solid, .•••••.••••.••••• 166 138 ---
Tot.al batdo-.,. C.CO, ..••••••• 1" "
Dile of colleelioa ••••••.•.•••••• llf20/4i 11/20/47
• AnaJyai! made by U.S. Oeol011ical Suney.
0 F1otr■ one--h1U 1.p.m. from hOfnblende goeilll.
1 Fe in 110lutio11 .01
II "
31 2;
·" ,.,
" 11
5.1 ,.,
" ,.,
0 0
107 84
Ill 4. I
2.2 u
1.0 .0
I.I .0
290 107
118 "
11/20/ti 2/16/411
··----· -________ ... _· •·
H
" .IS
IO
L.f.
8.3
0
40
J.V
13
.0
JO
Ill
"
2/16/411
Spriug ..
" " 9; 182 (G1111ton
No. A)
36 " J7 " 23
.08 ·" .09 1.0 .21a
II 9.2 12 8.3 ,.,
,.2 ·4.5 •. i 1.3 . 2.2
5.2 ,., , .. IO ,.,
0 0 0 ·o. .·. 0.
" 37 71 31 31 ,., 2.0 J.2 1.3 4.3
7 ., , .. 1.0 12 1.0 .o .o .I· .I .0
8.6 Il 1.6 I.I .2
114 IOi IOI " "
" 41 " " 21
2/13/48 2/16/48 8/11/45 8/11/45 5/20/411
57
Rr..lURll~
Xot u,e,d; water r,porteJ to
be too bard. Fbt.
Pumped at 35 a;.p.m. but will
not main lain this yield flat.
Slope.
&:hiat. Slofl'.
Schi.!.t. Slope.
&:hi,t. HiU.
Sthi,t. Suppliea vi!lai_e.
GnaveU. Vall,y.
Schi,t. Slope.
Scbiat. Dr1w.
Schi,t. Hill.
Do.
Hill.
Schist. Supply {aild Jurio(
autumn of 11140 and 19H.
Hill.
Scbi1t. Hill.
Gnanik Hill.
Scbi1t. Slope.
Schiat.
Granite.
Schi,t. Hill.
02° F. Schi1t. C..,J " ,.
75 feet. Hill.
Sebiat. Slope.
Scbi1t. Dnr.w.
Do.
Hill.
Willer rtr,oded soft. Hill .
DATE:
TO:
FRCM:
December 23, 1993
File
Reference 13
Davis Park Road TCE
NCD 986 175 644
Harry Zinn, Environmental Engineer
North Carolina DEHNR, Superfund Section
RE: Hydrogeology of Gastonia Area
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina
NCD 986 175 644
On December 22, 1993 I talked to Mr. Mark Durway (704-868-
3743), the former Hydrogeologist for Gaston County Health
Department, Environmental Health Section from 1991 to 1993, about
the hydrogeology in the vicinity of South Gastonia and specifically
the Davis Park Road site. Mr. Durway stated that in the area of
concern, there is no confining layer between the saprolite
(weathered bedrock) and the bedrock. The majority of the potable
water is obtained from fractures in the bedrock. His conclusion is
supported in three ways. First, this is based on all of the current
literature available on the local geology. Second, it is supported
by field observations of the stratigraphy in the area in t_he
vicinities of bedrock outcrops and stream bed cuts. Finally, it is
supported by personal geologic experience in the area during his.
·. three years in this area. ·
.....
I
I
I' ·-·
I:
I · .... :;. ..
I
.~::
_I:
I;
fli
l1
' ~
:,:1
.::,~ ,,~,
1··;3
"J
~
Reference 14
Davis Park Road TCE
NCD 986 175 644
EXP ANDED SITE INSPECTION .. -··---------·•·
Davis Road Park TCE
NCO 986 175 644
Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina
May 1994
Superfund Section
Division of Solid Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health
and Natural Resources
Prepared by:
~ ~
Harr~
Environmental Engineer
Reviewed by:
rover Nicholson
ederal Contracts ranch Head
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION ....................... ; . . . . . . . . . . . 1
SITE DESCRIPTION and WASTE CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . 1
WASTE/SOURCE SAMPLING ........................... 4
GROUND WATER PATHWAY ........................... 9
SURFACE WATER PATHWAY ......................... 14
SOIL EXPOSURE and AIR PATHWAYS .................... 14
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
APPENDIX
REFERENCES
:,:; .. -,
ii
II
I
II
II
11:;~-
I
' ....;
TABLE 2-1.
TABLE 3-1.
TABLE 3-2.
TABLE 4-1.
TABLE 4-2.
LIST OF TABLES
PREVIOUS SAMPLING RESULTS , .. , ........... 5
SGlL SAMx1LE LOCATIONS ................... 7
SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS ........... 7
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE
LOCATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE ANALYTICAL
RESULTS IN UG/KG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
\ \-~. \--·
\
\
I:: 1
\
\ ;.; .
'
\,·,•:.
· .. · .. / .::.-·
'
...
'
~~t -·~---
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
LIST OF FIGURES
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
SITE LOCATION MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONS .................. 8
i 1~
•--.
I-·.,.
1-
1~
IJ
I··• . . · ..
' ---··
'
I:
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Under the authority of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), and a cooperative agreement with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Waste Management Division, Region IV,
the North Carolina Superfund Section conducted an Expanded Site Inspection (ESI) at
the Davis Park Road site in Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina. Th~ purpose
of the ESI was to obtain the data necessary to assess the threat posed to human health and the environment and to complete a Hazard Ranking System (HRS) score for the
site to determine the need for further action under CERCLA or other authority. This
investigation included viewing existing files and sample data, conducting groundwater
and soil sampling under EPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) protocol (January
25, 1994), and collecting additional non-sampling data needed to test previous PA/SI
hypotheses and to document HRS factors.
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
2.1 · Location
The Davis Park Road TCE Site (DPR) is located between Hudson Boulevard
and Dogwood A venue west of the city of Gastonia within the Gastonia Extra
Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) area. The site consists of an area of contaminated soil
behind the Moore's Transmission and Auto Repair Shop (Moore's) and a plume of
contaminated groundwater that begins at the Moore's property at 2307 Davis Park Road and extends south along the west side of Davis Park Road to Dogwood A venue.
The site also includes the Cedar Oak Park Subdivision located on the east side of
Davis Park Drive within the confines of Cedar Oak Circle. The site can be found on
the Gastonia South, North Carolina USGS 7.5' Quadrangle Map at latitude 350 13'
56" N and 810 13' 08" W (Figure 1, Ref. 3).
2.2 Site Description
The site, situated on approximately 20 acres, includes private businesses and '
residential homes. The topography of the Moore's property is slightly sloped to the
west towards Crowder Creek (Figure 2). The source of the plume of contaminated
groundwater is an area of contaminated soil located behind Moore's in the vicinity of a drain line exiting the service bay in the facility.
2.3 Operational History
Prior to 1960, the site was owned by Mr. John Birch of Gastonia, who
operated a service station on-site. Mr. Carl Bell, 2916 Burnt Mill Road, Charlotte,
purchased the property in about 1960 and operated a service station on-site until about
1979 or 1980, when he leased the property to Mr. Roy Moore, who currently
operates a transmission rebuild and repair facility on-site (Ref. 4, 5, 6).
1
I
1:
I
,~
1:
1.:
·~ ~~e Figure I HRS Documentation Package
I
1·
1·
I
Ii
1,
I'.
I:
I
/ _:::::-
I:
~
I -
11 -
Ii !!,J
1-
1,
1-
1-
I
I
1:~:.
I
.:,,:J
I
I -I
I
~
I
. ·.·.• --~-'
See Figure 2 HRS Documentation Package
I: ::,.-,1
l
I·
::).
-··
I·
I;
·•· '<j ...
I
-
I
Ii
I
1: ., ·,
• .. , -~ f;f~ ,:1/.r: ,
See Figure 3 HRS Documentation Package
2.4 Waste Characteristics
In March of 1990 during routine sampling of the community well at the Cedar
Oak Park Subdivision, and again in April 1990, high levels of trichloroethylene
(TCE)and tetrachloroethylene (PCE)were detected in the groundwater. During
follow-up sampling by the Gaston County Health Department (GCH), three other
private residential wells were also found to be contaminated (Ref. 7).
The North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (DEM) performed
extensive sampling of the private wells in the vicinity of the site from May 1990 to
August 1992 (Table 2-1). Several samples were collected from soils behind the
Moore's operation close to a drain line which exits the rear of the building (Ref.8).
These soils were highly contaminated with PCE and TCE (Table 3-2). The drain line
was installed when Acme Petroleum installed service bays in the shop portion of the
service station. A holding tank was to be installed, but, when bedrock was
encountered at 2-3 feet, the tank was not installed (Ref. 9).
During an off-site reconnaissance on September 14, 1993, no other likely
sources of PCE and TCE were located in the vicinity of the site (Ref. 10). Based on
this information, the North Carolina Superfund Section believes discharges from the
drain line have contaminated the soils and subsequently the groundwater behind the
Moore's operation. The area of soils contamination has not been fully delineated;
however, sampling has shown that the area is greater than 1 square foot (Ref. 11) and
the area of stained soils appears to be approximately 5 square feet.
3.0 WASTE/SOURCE SAMPLING
3.1 Sample Locations
Based on the existing documentation of the drain line being the possible source
as listed in Section 2.4, source sampling conducted during the ESI was limited to
confirming the contaminated soils around the drain line. The soil sample locations
are listed on Table 3-1 and are shown on Figure 3-1 . Since PCE, TCE and their
degradation products were the only contaminants present in previous samples, only
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) analysis were performed on the samples.· A
duplicate soil sample was to have been collected from the third soil sample area,
however, when bedrock was encountered at 24" depth not enough soil was in the
sampling auger bucket to fill a duplicate.
4
Sample Location Agency
Billy Frank (CO· 7) DEM
2301 Davis Park Road GCEH
GCEH
Debbie Parker (C0-8) GCEH
2503 Davis Park Road
Glenda Rowland (C0-11) GCEH
234 7 Hedgewood Circle
W .L. Godwin IC0-1 2) GCEH
2231 Davis Park Road
Resampled IC0-23) GCEH
Shirley Fortner (C0-13) GCEH
2717 Davis Park Road
John Crenshaw (C0-14) GCEH
281 6 Davis Park Road
Ta rte (CO· 1 5) GCEH
2501 Briaroak
Hawe (C0-16) GCEH
2603 Davis Park Road
WGAS Radio (C0-1 7) GCEH
627 Davis Park Road ...
Crumley (C0-18) GCEH
2723 Davis Park Road
Coe (C0-19) GCEH
2212 Davis Park Road
Moore CW (C0-22) GCEH
see map
Doris Corella
2403 Davis Park Road GCEH
GCEH
DEM
James May DEM
2400 Sky\and Drive
Monte . GCEH
' GCEH
-----
TABLE 2·1 lcon·t1
Date Sample Type PCE
5/7/90 Drinking Water 0.25
5/15/90 . trace
7/12/90 trace
5/15/90 Drinkina Water
6/1/90 Drinkina Water
6/1 /90 Drinkina Water
7/12/90 Drinkino Water 1K
6/1/90 Drinkina Water Clean
6/1/90 Drinking Water trace
6/1/90 Drinking Water
6/11/90 Drinking Water n:
6/11/90 Drinkinq Water Clean
6/11/90 Drinkino Water
6/11/90 Drinkina Water trace
7/12/90 Drinking Water trace
5/20/90 Drinking Water trace
1/30/91 trace
7/23/92
5/7/90 Diinking Water 0.85
8/23/90 Drinking Water (Filtered)
8/23/90 Drinkina Water (Unfiltered) trace
'It;_: -~+·~-· ·•--· ·---•.
_.::; -----
TCE Chloroform ds-1,2 1, 1-Dichloro 1,2.4-Trl l,3.5·Tri Others
Dichloroethene ethane methylbenzene methylbenzene
44.5 trace 2.8
37.1 2.6
1K
yes
yes
trace
1.2 trace trace
yes
1K yes
trace
1 K
57 .55 trace 2.2 trace yes
24.3 1K 1.6 yes
28 trace 2.1 yes
17 0.33 2.2
yes
8.1
yes
441.1 1K 1.5 yes
---------
---

-

-
---

-
------

-
---
TABLE2·1 1,3,5-Tri TCE Chloroform cis-1,2 1, 1 Dichiaro 1,2.4-Tri Others
Sample Location Agency Date Sample Typ!l PCE
Dichloroethene ethane methylbenzene methylbenzene
Cedar Oak Subdivision Aquatech 3/31/90 Drinking Water 23.7 34.9 9.2
Aquatech 4/17/90 23. 7 34.9 9.2
GCEH , 5/1 /90 51.B
EPA ESD 7116/90 12 31
GCEH 8/23/90 20.9 56.1 trace yes
EPA ESD 1 0/9/90 14 41
Charles May (C0-1) GCEH 4/27/90 Drinking Water 1K 101.4 1 K 3.8 1race yes
2419 Davis Park Road GCEH ? 511 5/90 134.3
EPA ESD 7/6/90 82 3.BJ
GCEH 8/23/90 tr.ice 116.3 trace 4 yes
EPA ESD 10/9/90 68AJ 3.4AJ
GCEH 1/30/91 1K 84.2 1K 3.5 yes
GCEH 5/20/91 1K 66.2 1K 2.8 trace yes
Roy Moore {Moore Transmission) DEM . 5/7/90 Soil behind oaraoe late E!utinc Chemicals (LEC) 1 .3 EE06
2307 Davis Park Road DEM 5/7/90 Soil , a~ deep at dump spot Clean
DEM 7/12/90 Soil 32" deep at oil in ditch LEC 44000 yes
DEM 7/1 2/90 Soil 1 r deep at oil in ditch LEC 14000
2400 58D yes
DEM 8/8/91 · Soil 30" deep oily area behind shop j70 2700
DEM 8/8/91 Water in hole 30 2000 16 yes
720 1500 73D 91D yes
DEM 8/1 2/92 Soil beneath drain pipe 47
630 1300 52D yes
DEM 8/1 2/92 Soil 1' out and 16-deep at pipe
DEM 8/13/92 Water thru drain pipe 26 yes
DEM 8/1 3/92 Monitor Well #1 0.75 1K
Charles May (C0-1) GCEH 4/27/90 Drinking Water 1K 101.4 1K 3.8 trace yes
2419 Davis Park Road GCEH ? 5/15/90 134.3
EPA ESD 7/6/90 82 3.SJ
GCEH 8/23/90 trace 116.3 trace 4 yes
EPA ESD 10/9/90 68AJ 3.4AJ
GCEH 1/30/91 iK · 84.2 1K 3.5 yes
GCEH 5/20/91 1K 66.2 1K 2.8 trace yes
Skyland Drive CW (C0-2) GCEH 4/27/90 Drinking Water trace trace
see map
Jenkins CW !C0-3) GCEH 4/27/90 Drinking Water CLEAN
see map
Blake/Puritan CW {C0-4) GCEH 4/27/90 Drinkina Water CLEAN
see map
Cunninnham/Penny Park CW (C0-5) GCEH 4/27/90 Drinkino Water trJCe trace trace
see map
Russell Graves (C0-5) DEM 5/7/90 Drinkirio Water 0.31 8.4 0.18
2425 Davis Park Road GCEH 5/1 S/90 trJce 6.8
GCEH 7/1 2/90 7
•
I
.-
,-• -. -
I;,_:
··~• ; . ..:j 1· -·
. -~"": '
I
1:
~
' ,~
·1 .•
1--
I
!
II
I
I .• -
-1
~
3.2 Analytical Results
Samples used to delineate the source area of contamination were analyzed by a laboratory participating in the US EPA CLP as specified in the CLP Statement of Work. Data was validated by the US EPA Region IV, Environmental Service Division, and the validated data along with the Data Qualifier Report were provided to the North Carolina Superfund Section. A complete copy is provided in the APPENDIX to this report .
No VOC's were detected in the background sample. TCE and/or 1,2-dichloroethene (TOTAL), a biodegradation product of TCE, were detected in all of the soil samples. Toluene and total xylenes were also detected in the soil samples, however these are not above any health based benchmarks and are not contaminants of concern (Table 3-2, Ref.2).
6
■,II l:,8,1·1i-.·1 ~~:, .. 1 .. ! 111/11 '-.. , ... '.-fllll!' 1111!'
Sample Number Type
DR-001-SB Soil Boring 0-2 ft deep
composite
DR-002-SB Soil Boring 0-2 ft deep
composite
DR-003-SB Soil Boring 0-2 ft deep
composite
DR-004-SB Soil Boring 0-2 ft deep
composite
I
1,2-Dichloroethene (TOTAL)
Trichloroethene
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
Total Xylenes
ND -Non-Detect
BQL -Below Quantitation Limit
TABLE 3-1
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
NCD 986 175 644
Soil Sample Locations
Rational
Background Sample
Source sample # I
Source sample #2
Source sample #3
TABLE 3-2
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
NCD 986 175 644
Soil Sample Analytical Results
ug/kg
I DR-001-SB I DR-002-SB
ND 38
ND 20
ND 79
ND ND
ND 210
7
Description
Background sample located on-
site.
I' south of drain pipe
2' west of drain pipe
9" west of pipe
I DR-003-SB I DR-004-SB I
260 38
17 4-BQL
230 46
45 ND
330 100
-I
1-
1~
..,.., .
I· i
1-
1-
1:
I.
0 o □ 00000
◊ DD ' 0 o □□ D
oo □ 00
I A-DR-001-SB Source B-DR-002-SB Source
I' .. C-DR-003-SB Sourkce d 'l D-DR-004-SB Bae $roun Sol 1-DR-001-PW Godwin Well
I 2-DR-002-PW Bill Philbeck 3-DR-003-PW Doris Corella 4-DR-004-PW Charles May 5-DR-005-PW Russell Graves
D
/
/ ' 1'1k0R6 5 I
I 8 C,
I
\
\
' '---·-
RiC11LA'\iO Av'G □000 00
0 0 D D □
Gli=.N Qt,VEN AVG
D □□□Do D
000000
0
D
---.
' \
'\ \
~ .•
A >,
I
I
/
~ F:~:D:~~'~:,:T~-_:~f;;ti;'s~,~~:;:~:g-Points for Davis Park Road TCE site I ~~~~h ~~r~l-i~a .. --: '.)i vision of Solid: -----------------.. ---~-------·--.. -·---·-------. _1ste Management : Scale :Not to Scale : Date: April 1994 ·•:~uperfund Section\ ;it-~ N~rne: ~avis Park Road TCE ' ' '
Drawn By: H. Zinn
NCD 986 175 644
1·
I
I ··• ..
,,, ....
·-·-·
I·
I
3.3
4.0
4.1
4.2
Source Conclusions
Sampling has confirmed that an area of soil in the vicinity of the drain line is contaminated with TCE and degradation products; 1,2-Dichloroethene and 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethene. The area encompassed by the samples is approximately 0. 75 sq. ft., however the total area of contamination is suspected of being larger based on the observed stained soils.
GROUNDWATER PATIIWAY
Hydrogeology
The DPR site is located within the Piedmont Physiographic Province and is characterized as foliated to massive granitic rock unit of the King Mountain Belt. The formation is described as a coarse grained, porphyritic, well-foliated biotite granite. Others have described this formation to have several intrusive phases that exhibit cross-cutting relationships and differ in texture and degree of foliation. The rocks are megacrystic to equigranular granite to quartz monzonite (Ref. 13).
Most of the domestic water supplies, industrial supplies, and several municipal supplies in Gaston County are obtained from wells. Dug wells, usually found in older, rural areas, derive their water from the saprolite which is the weathered and disintegrated zone between the soil and the unweathered bedrock. Drilled wells, used for higher yields for industry and municipal use, obtain their water from either granite or schist formations (Ref. 14).
According to Mr. Mark Durway, the former hydrogeologist for the Gaston County Health Department, the saprolite and the fractured bedrock act as a single hydrologic unit (Ref. 15).
Groundwater Targets
The closest domestic well is located at the Doris Corella residence, 2403 Davis Park Road, about 150 feet south of the site. The closest community well is the Cedar Oak Park Subdivision well located less that 1/4 mile from the site (Figure 1). At the time of the ESI sampling event, the NC DEM was overseeing the installation of a deep monitoring well on-site. No sample results are available at this time.
Determining the population using groundwater as their potable water supply required several steps. First, the areas served by the Gastonia Water System were delineated on the topographic maps covering the Target Distance Limits (fDL). The urban areas, denoted as pink on the topographic maps, located outside of the Gastonia Water System were planimetered and this area was multiplied by the population density figure for South Gastonia (315.3 people/sq. mi.). Community wells were
9
1-
1-.
---.
1-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.3
4.4
located and houses served by them were delineated. Finally, those houses not covered by any of the previous delineations were counted as being served by private wells, and that number was multiplied by the house density for Gaston County (2.64 people/ household)(Ref. 16, 17).
Population Relying on Groundwater For Potable Water
Radius Population
0-¼ 162
¼-½ 441
½ -1 229
1 -

2

2132
2 -

3

5808
3 -

4

3357
Previous Investigations
The groundwater pathway for the DPR site has been extensively investigated from the time of the discovery of the contaminated well at Cedar Oak Park Subdivision up to the present as can be seen on Table 1. Gaston County Health, NC DEM, EPA ESD, and NC Superfund have all been involved in determining the extent of contamination that has occurred at the site. The detection of PCE, TCE and their degradation products has been consistent in those wells that are contaminated.
Sample Locations
The purpose of the ESI groundwater sampling was to establish private and community well contamination using CLP protocol. To do this we collected a background sample and samples from the five closest private and community wells which have shown to be contaminated during past investigations. To conserve CERCLA resources other nearby private and community wells which have been shown by past investigations to have levels of contamination below health-based benchmarks were not sampled. No on-site monitonng wells were present at the time of the ESI sampling event.
10
l
1--..
1-
··~-
I: ..
··; ..
1-
•·
I
w•.
1·
*;-
I
I -
I
I
I
I,
_;;;
I ,~--
; -· ' ' I ·~'lj
'·
4.5 Analytical Results
Samples used to document a observed release of contaminants to groundwater and to determine actual contamination of drinking water wells were analyzed by a laboratory participating in the EPA CLP as specified in the CLP Statement of work. Data was validated by the US EPA Region IV, Environmental Service Division, and the validated data along with the Data Qualifier Report were provided to the North Carolina Superfund Section. A complete copy is provided in the APPENDIX to this report.
Only VOC's were tested for during the ESI since PCE, TCE, and their degradation products are the only suspected contaminants at the site. Table 4-2 summarizes the results of the VOC analysis performed on the groundwater samples. Samples DR-003-PW, DR-004-PW, DR-005-PW, and DR-006-PW all show contamination with PCE and/or TCE at levels above health-based benchmarks published in the Superfund Chemical Data Matrix (March 1993).
11
Sample Number
DR-001-PW
DR-002-PW
DR-003-PW
DR-004-PW
DR-005-PW
DR-006-PW
DR-JOI-PW
DR-104-PW
DR-105-PW
DR-106-PW
TABLE 4-1
DA VIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
NCD 986 175 644
Groundwater Sample Locations
Type Rational
Groundwater grab Background Sample
Groundwater grab Determine actual .
contamination
Groundwater grab Determine actual
contamination
Groundwater grab Determine actual
contamination
Groundwater grab Determine actual
contamination
Groundwater grab Determine actual
r.ontamination
Trip Blank QA/QC
Preservative Blank QA/QC
Rinsate Blank QA/QC
Duplicate QA/QC
12
-.. I
Oescription
Godwin Well
2231 Davis Park Road
Philbeck Well
2301 Davis Park Road
Corella Weil
2403 : ;a vis Park Road
May Well
2419 Davis Park Road
Tcmplcins Well
2425 Davis Park Road
Cedar Oak Park Sub.
Cedar Oak Circle
Trip Blank
Preservative Blank
Rinsate Blank
Duplicate
1,:: ... ,.-· lllit-i -1--.I'
-
:. -I .11111!1 i -~; 111111 , -i -. .. --: -11111!1 ..
PCE TCE
DR-001-PW ND ND
DR-002-PW ND ND
DR-003-PW ND 10
DR-004-PW ND 38
DR-005-PW ND 11
DR-006-PW 18 51
DR-IOI-PW ND ND
DR-104-PW ND ND
DR-105-PW ND ND
DR-106-PW 17 50
ND -Non-Detect
BQL -Below Quantitation Limit
TABLE 4-2
DA VIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
NCD 986 175 644
Groundwater Sample Analytical Results
ug/kg
CHLOROFOR 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
M (fOTAL)
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND 2-BQL
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
11 ND
3-BQL ND
ND ND
13
I, I, 1-TRICHLOROETHENE
ND
:~l)
ND
ND
ND
5-BQL
ND
ND
ND
5-BQL
I; • ~
Ii;
•~:
I;
I: -~ .,
I:
I
I
I:_,,.·,._ ..
. ,
' · ..
4.6
5.0
5.1
5.2
5.3
6.0
6.1
Conclusions
The DPR site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province. The
saprolite/fractured bedrock make up a single hydrologic unit. Previous sampling has
shown contamination attributable to the site.
Samples collected during this ESI using CLP protocol havedocumented a
release of contaminants from the site to the groundwater and contamination of potable
wells exceeding health-based benchmarks .
SURFACE WATER PATHWAY
Hydroloey
Surface water drainage from the site is through swales, ditches and an
intermittent stream for over 1/2 mile before it enters Crowder Creek, the Probable
Point of Entry (PPE)(Figure 1). The 15 mile surface water pathway ends in Crowder
Creek before it enters Lake Wylie.
Targets
Crowder Creek is not classified as potable but is a fishery (Ref. 8, 9). No
surface water intakes are located within the 15 mile surface water pathway.
Conclusion
Since the contaminants are VOC' s with relatively high health-based
benchmarks and previous investigations have shown that the site does not pose a
significant threat to human health and the environment, the surface water pathway is
not a pathway of concern.
SOIL EXPOSURE and AIR PATHWAYS
Conclusions
Contaminated soil is located behind the Moore's facility in the vicinity of the
drain pipe coming out of the building. This soil is contaminated with PCE, TCE and
their degradation products; 1-2 ,Dichloroethene and 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethene, along with
toluene, ethyl benzene and xylenes. The extent of soil contamination has not been
determined, however, the stained soils are confined to an area of about 5 square feet.
The contaminated soils are limited to the site.
14
•··
•~--·~ :,;1-·•
•·
1J
•f.J.-,
' I\:
f-~
I·
I·
I·
I.
I'.
I:
I·
'
I·
Ii
't;;
ii, .~
. ' d
7.0
The levels of all of the contaminants found in the soils are well below any health-based benchmarks, and no schools, day care facilities, or residences are located on and within 200 feet of the contaminated soil. Based on these facts and since previous investigations have shown that the site does not pose a significant threat to human health and the environment, the soil exposure pathway is not a pathway of concern.
No release to the air pathway is suspected. No evidence of off-gassing was present during the ESI sampling event. Based on these observations and since previous investigations have shown that the site does not pose a significant threat to human health and the environment, the air pathway is not a pathway of concern.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
At some time during the operation of the site as ~ service station or transmission and auto repair facility, PCE and/or TCE was released from the site through a drain line installed in the service bay area of the building. These contaminants found on-site in the soil around ihe drain pipe exiting the Moore's facility, have migrated into the groundwater. PCE, TCE and their degradation products have been found in several private wells and a community well at levels above the Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL's) set by the US EPA. An observed release of hazardous contaminants to the groundwater and the actual contamination o"r private wells and a community well above health-based benchmarks has been documented using US EPA CLP protocol.
Previous investigations have shown that the site is not a significant threat to human health or the environment through the surface water, soil exposure, or air pathways.
The NC Superfund Section is recommending that the Davis Park Road TCE site proceed on with the preparation of an HRS package for the possible inclusion of this site on the National Priorities List.
15
f: .. ~.
t~
· ... ,;·'
l ~~--i :
f
~·;' . '
I!
•
1-:
II '···.
----·
I:
~
••
8l
I __ )
i:l
LIST OF REFERENCES FOR THE DA VIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE EPA ID NUMBER -NCO 986 175 644
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1990. Hazard Ranking System; Final Rule. 55 FR 51532, December 14, 1990,
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1991. Superfund Chemical Matrix (SCDM). Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Directive 9345.1-13. Revised semi-annually.
3. Latitude and Longitude Coordinates Worksheets from Guidance for Perfonning Preliminar_y Assessments Under CERCLA U.S.EPA Publication 9345.0-0lA September 1991 Appendix E
4. Wallingford, Ed. 19~1 memo to file Re: Site visit notes. July 11.
5. Nicholson, Bruce. 1991 memo to file Re: Telecon with Roy Moore, Operator of Moore's Transmission and Auto Repair. February 18.
6. Wallingford, Ed. 1990 memo to file Re: Telecon with Carl Bell, Owner of Moore's Transmission shop Property. August 6.
7. DeRosa, Patricia. 1990 memo to file Re: TCE Well Contamination. June 19.
8. Huff, Chris. Greenhome & O'Mara 1992 memo to Chris DeRoller, NCDHNR, Mooresville Office Re: Additional Information Regarding Moore's Transmission Shop. February 6.
9. Zinn, Harry. 1993 memo to file Re: Drainage Pipe Identification. April 26.
10. Zinn, Harry. 1993 memo to file Re: Field Notes from Off-site Recon on September 14, 1993. September 17.
11. Zinn, Harry. 1994 memo to file Re: Field Notes from Sampling Trip on January 25, 1994. January 27.
12. Syracuse Research Corporation for U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry (ATSDR), "Toxicological Profile for Tetrachloroethylene" January 1990 ATSDR/TP-88/22 and "Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene" October 1989 ATSDR/TP-88/24.
13. North Carolina Geological Survey "Preli minar_y Explanatory Text for the 1985 Geologic Map of North Carolina" November 4, 1988.
14. LeGrand, H.E. and Mundorff, M.J., USGS "Geology and Ground Water in the Charlotte Area, North Carolina• Bulletin Number 63, February 1952.
15. Zinn, Harry. 1993 memo to file Re: Hydrology of Gastonia Area. December 23.
16. Zinn, Harry. 1994 memo to file Re: Groundwater Population for DPR TCE site. May 10.
17. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census, "Census 90".
18. Stanley, Jeanette. 1994 memo to file Re: Update on Status of Well Head Protection Programs in N.C. January 10.
19. NC Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, DEM "Classifications and Water Quality Standards Assigned to the Waters of the Catawba River Basin" 15 NCAC 2B .0308 June 30, 1989. '
20. Nicholson, Bruce. 1991 memo to file Re: Telecon with Chris Goodreau, NC Wildlife Resources Fisheries Biologist. February 18.
21. Zinn, Harry. Field Log for Sampling Trip on January 25, 1994.
22. Zinn, Harry. 1994 memo to file Re: Private Well Data for DPR TCE site. May 11.
.,, ,, '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NORTH SUPERFUND ID:404-562-8788 OCT
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment.
Health t1nd Ncrlurcl Roiource,
Jomes B. Hunt, Jr .. Govel'IWlr I Wayne McDevltt Secretu[y
!
I
Ms. Cat0l M. Browner, AidministratoF ·
U.S. Environmenbll Protection Agency
40 l M Street, SW
Washinaton, DC 20460
Subj: Prop0sa1 For NPL. Listina
Davis Park Road TCB Site
Gastonia, Outon County, NC
NCD 986 I 7S 6~
S(P J D 1997
The U.S. BnviJonmcnllll l'ru~tiou Agc,uc.yR.1:gio11. 4_ Offiee b4! solicited Nofth · .
Carolina's opinion on proposinJ the Davis Park RoadTCE Site For the Naiional Priorities List
(NPL),. The site is in obvjous need of a ccmtinucd response a~tlon bcllllUfle numerous private and
communlty wells are cc,n~ted with chlo~d uolve11t8_. Theufore, if the EP.A.pr"JVl~ell
this site for the NPL, NOflh Carolina would support l!IU:h en action. ·
i
I
T Rl'J:'re.ciate the 9' A's rcquealin,e· our input on.such ,sites, and I look forward to
continuing our working partnership with Regiori 4 on CER.CLA matters,
' . ~i~~. . . • . ~~
Wp.yne. M.:Dcvill
Secn:tary
WMcD:WLM
cc: LindQ Rimer, NCiR
Willia.uJ Meyer, CDWM
Jack Butler,.NCD
Ricl:wd Green. ~ A Region 4
Cynthie Ourley, 1f"' Reg,nn 4
P,0, 8oX 27687, Rolelgt"I, North Car011na 27Cl1 l-76&7 T.l,.pt,on" 919-716-<1100 rNC ?1? 716 a060
· /lorl Equal Opportur,tty Alllrmative AC!lon Emr,10';8' 50'll recvcled/10' pc,ol-consull'l9! papa-