NCD986175644_19921106_Davis Park Road TCE Site_FRBCERCLA PA SI _Site Inspection-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
u
D
l)H
JI
1
I
State of North Carolina I
Department of Environment, Health, and Naturfl Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 · Raleigh, North Carolina 276lr-7687
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Mr. Craig Benedikt
NC CERCLA Project Officer
EPA Region IV Waste Division
345 Courtland Street, NE,
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
RE: Site Inspection (SI)
Davis Park Road TCE Site
November 6, 1992
Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina
NCD 986 175 644
Dear Mr. Benedikt:
William L. Meyer
Director
Enclosed herewith is the Site Inspection (SI) by Green home and O'Mara, Inc., for Davis
Park Road TCE Site, (NCD 986 175 644).
Greenhorne and O'Mara, Inc., has taken the position that two other possible sources of
TCE present within approximately two miles of the site may have contributed to the
contaminated groundwater plume. They have not designated a source !for the contamination.
The N.C. Superfund Section believes that the contaminated soils located behind the Moore I Transmission Repair Shop found at the end of a drain pipe originating inside the shop pinpoints
the source. Due to the distance from the other areas of contamination, the topography between
the site and the other suspected sources, and the existence of a clean well located at WGAS
Radio between the site and the other suspected sources we feel that these sources have not
contributed to the contamination at this site.
Regardless of whichever scenario is chosen, however, the Nor\h Carolina Superfund
Section is recommending that the site proceed to the Expanded Site Investigation stage on a high
priority basis.
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
If you have any questions, please contact me at (919) 733-280:J.
HZ\gj
Enclosure
cc: Dexter Matthews
file
'
Sincerely, :
JI~)~
Harry Zinni
Environmerital Engineer
' Contracts Management Branch
NC SuperfJnct Section I
I
I
1•
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
I I
I STATEOF
NORTH CAl<.OLINA
Departrnent of Environment, Jiealt.h,
and Natural Resources
Division of Solid H'aste Management
Superfund Section
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
I
GASTONIA, NORTH CAROLINA
NCO 986175644
PHASE I SITE SCREENING INVES1ilGATION
OCTOBER 1992
By:
Grcenhorne & O'f\1ara, Inc.
I
'• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1•
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.
I
I
PHASE I
SITE SCREENING INVESTIGATION
FOR
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
GASTONIA, NORTH CAROLINA
NCD 986 175 644
Submitted to:
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, HeRlth.
and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
Superfund Section
Raleigh, North Carolina
Prepared By:
Greenhorne & O'Hara, Inc.
4101 Lake Boone Trail
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
October 1992
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I<
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ;
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY •.•..•.•.•.••..•.•....•••••.••••.••...••• 1 ••••.•.•.•••••••• i
1. 0 INTRODUCTION •.•••.•••••••.•••.•.•••••••••••.••••.••••••••••••••••••••• 1 '
1.1 OBJECTIVES .•.••.••••.•••••••.•••••••••••••••••••• ! ................ 1
I
1.2 SCOPE OF \/ORK .•••.•...•••••.•....•••••••.•.••.••••..••••••••..••.. 1 '
2. 0 SITE CHARACTERIZATION .••.••.•••..•.•••••••.••••••••.• ! ................ 3
2.1 SITE LOCATION AND LAYOUT ••.••••••••••..••••••.•••••••••••••••••••• 3
2. 2 SITE OWNERSHIP /HISTORY OF USE .••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••.. 3
2.3 PROCESS AND \/ASTE DISPOSAL HISTORY ••••.•..•.••••• ! ................ 4
I
2. 4 PERMITS AND REGULATORY HISTORY •.•.•••••••.•••••••••.••••••••..••.. 4
2. 5 REMEDIAL ACTIONS TO DATE ••••.•••••••••••••••••••• , •••••••••••••••• 5
i 3. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .•••••••..•..••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••.••••••• 6
3 .1 TOPOGRAPHY .•••••••••.••••••.••..•.••••••••• : ••••• '. ••.•••.••.•••.•. 6
3. 2 SURFACE \/ATER ••••.•.••••.••••••••••••...••••••.•• ! ...........•.... 6 I
3.2.1 Overland Drainage and Affected \later Bodies; ...•••.......••• 6
3. 2. 2 Climatology ................................................. 6
I
3.3 GROUNDWATER ••••..••••.•••..•.••••••...••••••••••• ; •••..••••••••••• 6
I ' 3. 3 .1 Geology ..................................................... 6
3.3.2 Aquifer Use ................•.......•........•...........•... 7 I
3. 3. 3 Soils ......................•........•...................••.. 7
3. 4 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION •••••.•••.•••.••••••••••••••••••••••.•••..• 9
3.5 \/ATER SUPPLY ••••••••.••••••.••••••••••••••••••••• '. ••••••••.•••••• 10
3.6 LAND USE ...••••.••••...•••.••••.••.••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 10
3. 7 SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTS ••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••••• 10
' 4. 0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...••••••••••••••••••• ; ••••••••.•••••. 12
REFERENCES
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
MAPS, PHOTOGRAPHS AND TABLES
ANALYTICAL RESULTS REPORT
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1•
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Davis Park Road TCE Site encompasses an area of approximately 20 acres,
including both private business and residential homes. The source of the
I
TCE contamination at the Davis Park Road site has not yet been determined;
however, Moore's Transmission Shop at 2307 Davis Park Road has been
identified as one of the possible sources. The Moore' s1 Transmission Shop
I
building has been in existence for over 30 years. It was originally owned
by Mr. John Birch of Gastonia and served as a automobi~e service station.
I
Around 1960, Mr. Carl Bell of Charlotte bought the bui~ding and continued
to operate the facility as a service station
Bell leased the facility to Mr. Roy Moore.
facility as a transmission repair shop.
inspection at Moore 1 s Transmission Shop,
until 1980. I At that time,
Mr. Moore ~urrently uses
Mr.
the
In July 1990, during a site
I staff from the Mooresville
'
Regional Office, Groundwater Section
Management discovered the existence of
of the Department of Environmental
I
' underground storage tanks (UST) on
i
the property. On January 22, 1991, the Davis Park Road TCE Site was placed
on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Compreherisive Enviromental
I
Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS). On
February 12, 1991, the North Carolina Department of Envi~onment, Health and
' Natural Resources issued a compliance notice in accordance with 40 CFR
280.70 Temporary Tank Closures which states, "when
1
a UST system is
temporarily closed for more than 12 months, owners and operators must
permanently close the UST system if it does not meet EPAlrequirements.' On
February 18, 1991, the USTs at Moore's Transmission Shop were removed.
Upon removal of the tank, surrounding soils w.ere tested !for contamination.
The results indicated that no contamination was present in the soils.
The Davis Park TCE site is located within the Piedmont Physiographic
Province and is further characterized as Foliated to Mas1sive Granitic rock
unit of the King Mountain Belt. The formation is desqribed as a coarse
grain, porphyritic, well-foliated biotite granite. There are five
predominate soil types in the Davis Park Road/Cedar Oak: Park Area. These
include Appling sandy loam, Cecil-Urban land complex, 1 Helena-Urban land
complex, Pacolet sa·ndy loam, and lledowee sandy loam.
In Gaston County, most of the residential, industrial, and municipal
i
I
1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
water supplies are obtained from wells. Wells in rural residential
I
sections are dug type wells that derive water from ,the weathered and
disintegrated zone between the soil and the underlying unweathered rock.
Drilled wells, used for higher yield for industrial and municipal use,
obtain water from either granite or schist formations.
The closest well to the site is the Charles May j residence located
approximately 200 feet south of the site.
16,718 people living within 4 miles of
It has been estimated that
the site are dependent upon ' groundwater for their water supply. The City of Gastonia obtains its water
from South Fork Catawba River located northeast of the city. Based on the
available information, a release of a hazardous substance has been detected
in the Charles May residence well and the Cedar Oak Park Subdivision well.
At this time, the above contamination can not be dire~tly attributed to
' Moore's Transmission Shop; however, during the removal of the USTs, a DEM
representative discovered a drain pipe exiting the build~ng. Consequently,
a soil sample collected at the pipe's discharge point I was analyzed, and
revealed concentrations
Dichloroethylene (DCE)
of Trichloroethylene (TCE) at
I this
700 ppb
e~idence,
and
the at 3,000 ppb. Based upon
transmission shop could be a contributor to the groundwater contamination.
I It should also be noted that there are two othe, sources of TCE
contamination located within two miles of the Davis Park Road site that
I
I could be contributing to the groundwater plume. As a result, Greenhorne &
'
O'Mara, Inc. (G&O) is recommending that the North Carolina Department of
I
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR) combine the sites
contributing to the groundwater contamination as one "si!te" for evaluation
I
under the Federal Superfund Program. G&O is also 1 d" h h recommen ing t at t e
site proceed
contamination
to the
was
next
found
stage
in
of the site assessment process since
. d . 1 d ink. I 11 · resi entia r 1.ng I water we s 1.n
concentrations significantly higher than health-based beJ:\chmarks.
I
In addition, G&O is recommending that emergency response] measures be taken
to reduce the risks to those individuals relying on groundwater as their
I
drinking water source if concentrations have not decreased since the
sampling events in 1990 .
ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1. 1 OBJECTIVES
Greenhorne & O'Mara, Incorporated (G&O) is currently conducting the
I
initial phase of the site inspection (SI) at the Davis •Park Road TCE Site
located in Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina. The overall objective
of the SI is to provide information to support
site should move onto the next stage of the
the reco~mendation that the
i
pre-remedial process or be
' designated as "no further remedial action planned (,NFRAP)' under the
I
Federal Superfund program. Additional objectives of the SI are the
following:
Identify the types of contaminants present.
Assess whether a release of hazardous substances has occurred; '
Search for evidence of actual human and environmental exposure to
contaminants.
Determine the likelihood of the site scoring high enough on the
revised Hazard Ranking System (HRS) to be recmrimended for further
pre-remedial action under the Federal Superfundlprogram.
The SI builds upon data obtained during the preliminary assessment (PA) I
to further characterize problems on or near the site and to support a
management recommendation.
1.2 SCOPE OF VORK
The scope of work for this site includes the following tasks:
Review EPA and state file material regar<iing permits and
regulatory history.
Collect additional data that is readily ava:ilable to further
characterize the site and the surrounding environment, as well as
to further address the requirements of the revised HRS.
Analyze laboratory data that may
sampling activities, and present the
addition, discuss all releases in the
1
I
be available from previous
data in summary tables. In
SI report!
J
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I .~
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I .
I
Prepare an SI report that presents information gathered, field
observations,· and .laboratory data with resl)ect to observed
releases. Any existing data gaps will be discussed in the text.
Greenhorne & O'Mara was not contracted to collect all of the data
necessary to prepare a full and complete HRS sco~ing package.
I
2
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.0 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
2.1 SITE LOCATION AND LAYOUT
Davis Park Road TCE Site is located between Hudson B9ulevard and Penny
Park Drive in the City of Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina (Appendix
A, Figure 1) . The site encompasses an area of approximately 20 acres.
I .
This area includes both private business and residential homes along Davis
Park Road. The site can be found on the Gastonia South N~rth Carolina USGS
I
7. 5' Quadrangle Map at latitude 35° 13 • 56 "N and longitude 81 ° 13' 08 "II
(Ref.1&13).
2.2 SITE OVNERSHIP AND HISTORY
The source of the TCE contamination at the Davis
yet been determined. However, Moore's Transmission
Park Road site
I Shop,, located
has not
at 2307
Davis Park Road, has been identified as one of the posstble sources. The
Moore's Transmission Shop building has been in
It was originally owned by Mr. John Birch of
existence for over 30 years.
I
Gastonia and utilized as an
automobile service station. Around 1960, Mr. Carl Bell of Charlotte
I
purchased the building and continued to operate the'. facility as an
automobile service station until 1980. At that time, Mr. Bell leased the
I
facility to Mr. Roy Moore. Mr. Moore currently uses the facility as a
I
transmission repair shop (Ref. 18).
In July 1990, the Mooresville Regional Office of the North Carolina i
Department of Environmental Management (DEM), Groundwater Section,
I
conducted a site inspection. During the inspectio~, DEM personnel
I discovered the existence of petroleum underground storage tanks (USTs) on
' the property. On February 12, 1991, the North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources issued a comJ)liance notice in
accordance with 40 CFR 280.70 Temporary Tank Closures that states,• when a
UST system is temporarily closed for more than 12 months, owners and
operators must permanently close the UST system if it hoes not meet EPA
requirements (Ref. 19)." On February 18, 1991, the\ USTs at Moore's
Transmission Shop were removed. At the time of removal, one tank I reportedly had 5 to 7 inches of product and the other hf'd 3 to 4 inches.
The product had a paint thinner-like odor. Upon removal of the tank, soils
3
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I • ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.
I
I
in the vicinity of the tanks were tested for contaminatiori. Results showed
no contamination present in the soils (Refs. 15 &17).
2.3 PROCESS AND WASTE DISPOSAL
In July 1990, a site inspection of the Moore's Transmission Shop was
conducted by the staff from the Mooresville Regional Office, Groundwater
Section of the Department of
Health Department. During
Environmental Management and:the
I
the inspection, Mr. Roy Mo~re,
'
Gaston County
owner of the
transmission shop, stated the type of work performed at the facility
consisted of the repair and restoration of automobile transmissions. Waste
transmission fluid and oil are stored in 55-gallon meta~ drums, which are
staged on asphalt in the front part of the property. Thejwaste material is
recycled and used for heating the building in the winter (Ref. 16). Mr.
Moore knew nothing of the facility when it was a servic,e station, and he
stated that Mr. Bell, the owner of the property,
concerning the history of the property.
should be contacted
I
Mr. Moore indicated that there may be anther source of contamination .
He stated that there had been a tani__er truck parked in a church parking lot
located approximately 1/4 mile
was from a chemical company in
south of the transmission• shop. The truck
I Charlotte. He also stated that the parking
' lot showed signs of damage and speculated it may be from chemicals stored
in the truck. Mr. Moore indicated that the truck disappeared when news
' surfaced that the groundwater in the area was contaminated. A ' representative of the Department of Environmental ManagJment, Mooresville I
office, said that other sources confirmed this as well. DEM also inspected
the parking lot and concluded that the lot was damaged due to the weight of
the truck rather than a chemical spill (Ref. 17).
2.4 PERMITS AND REGULATORY HISTORY
On March 31, 1990, Mr. Grady Russ, certified well operator of the Cedar
Oak Park subdivision, collected a water sample
'Community Well Rules" and had the sample analyzed.
in, accordance with
I The results from the
sample revealed elevated levels of Trichloroethylene (34.9 ppb),
Tetrachloroethylene (23. 7 ppb), and Chloroform
second sample was collected on April 17, 1990,
4
(9.2 ppb) (Ref. 25). A
and the results closely
I
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
II
match the first sample. As a result, the subdivision sJitched to a backup
I
well that was not contaminated. This well, however, has !a much lower yield
than the primary well.
Since the first report of contaminated groundwater on May 1, 1990 (Ref.
13), three private wells around the Cedar Oak Park subdivision have shown
levels of Trichloroethylene (TCE) above the North CarJlina Public Water ' System Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 5 ppb (Refs'. 24 & 26).
!
The
highest level of TCE measured was 101.4 ppb at the Charles May residence,
located approximately 200 feet south of the site (Ref. 14). On July 6,
1990, the EPA collected samples from the contaminated ~ells in the Davis
Park Road/Cedar Oak Park subdivision area. Results show the Charles May
I
residence and Cedar Oak Park subdivision wells are contaminated with TCE at
I
concentration of 82 ppb and 81 ppb, respectively (Ref. 23). However, for
the EPA to initiate a removal action, TCE contaminati'on must be either
greater than or equal to the 128 ppb action level or be increasing so that
it appears that the 128 ppb action level may be reached in the near future
(Ref. 22) .
2.5 REMEDIAL ACTIONS TO DATE
On January 22, 1991 the Davis Park Road TCE Site was placed on the U.S.
EPA's CERCLIS listFederal Superfund
Department of Environment, Health, and
Program with the North Carolina
! Natural Resources,, Division of Solid
Vaste Management, Superfund Section as the lead agency
I
(Ref. 20). On
February 12, 1991, the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and
I Natural Resources issued a compliance notice to Mr. Carl 1Bell in accordance
with 40 CFR 280. 70 Temporary Tank Closures which sta~es, "when an UST
system is temporary closed for more than 12 months, owners and operators
must permanently close the UST system if it
requirements (Ref. 19)." On February 18, 1991,
does 1not meet certain
I the USTs at the Moore's I
Transmission Shop were removed. At the time of the -removal, one tank
reportedly had 5 to 7 inches of product and the other .had 3 to 4 inches
remaining in the tank. The product had a paint thinner like odor. Upon
tank removal, surrounding soils were tested for contamin1ation. Analytical
results indicated that the soils were not contaminated (Refs. 15 & 17).
5
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
3.1 TOPOGRAPHY
The topography of the Davis Park Road TCE site i!s relatively flat I
around the site but slopes westerly towards Crowder Creek. Elevations on
' the site range from approximately 770 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum
' (NGVD) around the site, to approximately 660 feet at Crowder Creek (Figure
' 1; Ref. 1).
3.2 SURFACE WATER
3.2.1 Overland Drainage and Potentially Affected \later Bodies I The distance to the nearest downstream surface water body, Crowder
I Creek, is approximately 3,500 feet. The change in elevation over this
horizonal distance is approximately 110 feet, therefore the slope of the
intervening terrain is estimated to be 3. 7%. Crowder Creek flows south-
southeast into South Carolina. Approximately 15 miles downstream, Crowder
Creek flows into Lake llylie (Ref. 1). Crowder Creek inl the Gastonia area
has no recreational use except for very limited bridge fishing several
miles downstream of the site. However, once Crowder Creek nears Lake llylie
some recreational activities such
possible (Refs. 8 & 9). The State
Creek as being suitable for Class
as fishing, canoeing,I and swimming are
of North Carolina has !designated Crowder I .
C uses, which include' fish and wildlife
propagation, secondary recreation, and agriculture (Ref. ~ .8). There are no
public water supply surface water intakes within 15
TCE site.
3.2.2 Climatology
miles' of the Davis Park I
Gaston County has a mean annual precipitation of, approximately 46
I inches and a mean annual lake evaporation of approximately 40 inches (Ref.
' 2). Therefore, the net annual precipitation is 6 inche.1. The 2-year, 24-
1 hour rainfall in this area is approximately 3.0 inches (Ref. 3).
3.3 GROUNDWATER
3.3.1 Geology
The Davis Park TCE site is located within the Piedmont Physiographic
Province and is further characterized as Foliated to Massive Granitic rock
6
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
unit of the King Mountain Belt. The formation is desct°ibed as a coarse
I
grain, porphyritic, well-foliated biotite granite. Others have described
'
this formation to have several intrusion phases exhibiting cross-cutting
relationships and differing in texture and degree of foliation. The rocks I
are megacrystic to equigranular granite to quartz monzonite (Ref. 4).
3.3.2 Aquifer Use I
Most of the domestic water supplies, industrial supplies and several
municipal supplies in Gaston County are obtained from wells. The wells
used in rural sections are dug type wells that deriJe water from the
I
weathered and disintegrated zone between the soil and the underlying I
unweathered rock. Drilled wells, used for higher yield for industrial and
I
municipal use, obtain water from either granite or schist formations.
I These wells have an average depth of 180 feet for schist,wells and 165 for
granite wells. Average yields for these formations range from 150 and 100
I
gallons per minute respectively (Ref. 10). The closest domestic well to
!
the site is the May residence, which is located approximately 250 feet
south of the site. The closest community well is the Cedar Oak Development
located approximately 1/4 mile south of the site (Ref. 1),
3.3.3 Soils
' There are five predominate soil types in the Davis Park Road TCE Site I area. These include Appling sandy loam, Cecil-Urban land complex, Helena-
Urban land complex, Pacolet sandy loam, and Wedowee sandy loam.
The Appling sandy loam is a well drained soil, which is located on
broad, smooth ridges throughout the county. Areas of this soil type are
irregular shaped and range from 4 to 100 acres in size .I Typically, this
' soil has a brown sandy loam surface layer approximately 10 inches thick. ' .
The subsoil, to a depth of 48 inches, is brownish yellow
1
sandy loam in the
upper region, a yellowish brown sandy clay loam in the middle and yellowish
' brown sandy clay loam mottled with red in the lower region. The underlying
material, to a depth of 60 inches, is a multicolored sa~rolite that has a
sandy clay loam texture. Permeability is moderate and' the shrink-swell
potential is low. The water table and bedrock are below a depth of 6 feet.
The hazard of erosion is moderate in bare, unprotected ar~as. This soil is
used mainly as cropland or pasture, the rest is used as !woodland or is in
urban areas (Ref. 11).
7
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
The Cecil-Urban land complex consist of cecil soil and urban land.
Cecil soil is a well drained soil located on broad ridkes mostly in and
around Gastonia. Cecil soil makes up 50 to 65 percent of this land
complex. Areas of this land complex are irregular
to 400 acres in size. Typically, Cecil soil has a
shapedjand range from 10
I yellowish red sandy clay
loam surface that is about 6 inches -thick. The subsoil,, to a depth of 58
inches, is a I • red clay in the top region to a red clay 'loam in the lower
region. The underlying material, to a depth of 80 inches, is red saprolite
that has a loam texture. Cecil soil has a moderate permeability and
shrink-swell is low. The water table and bedrock are notlwithin a depth of
6 feet. The subsoil is very acidic. The hazard of ero,sion is severe in
bare, unprotected areas (Ref. 11). I
The Helena-Urban land complex consists of Helena soil and urban land.
Helena soil is a moderately well drained soil located on smooth ridges, toe
slopes and drainageways located mostly in and around Gastonia. Helena soil
makes up so· to 65 percent of this land complex. Areas of this land complex
are irregular oblong shaped and range from 4 to 20 acres in size .
Typically, this Helena soil has a grayish brown sandy loam surface that is
about 8 inches thick. The subsoil, to a depth of 39 inches, is a light
yellowish brown sandy clay loam in the upper region a pale brown to strong
I
brown sandy clay that has light gray mottles in the mid region and a
reddish yellow sandy clay loam with light gray mottles in the lower region.
The underlying material, to a depth of 60 inches, .i!s_ a multicolored
saprolite that has a sandy clay loam texture. This Helena soil has a slow
permeability and shrink-swell is high. The seasonal high water table is
within a depth of 18 to 30 inches.
of 5 feet. The soil is very acidic.
bare, unprotected areas (Ref. 11).
Depth to bedrock is Jot I The hazard of erosion
within a depth
is moderate in
The Pacolet sandy loam is a well drained soil. It isllocated on slopes
and narrow ridges throughout the county. Areas of this soil are irregular
oblong shaped and range from 5 to 50 acres in size.
soil has a brown sandy loam surface that is about 5
Typically, Pacolet
iAches thick. The
subsoil, to a depth of 39 inches, is a red clay loam in the upper region, a
I
red clay in the mid region and a red clay loam in the l~wer region. The
I underlying material, to a depth of 60 inches, is a mult~colored saprolite
8
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
that has a loam texture. Pacolet soil has a moderate permeability and
shrink-swell is low. The water table and bedrock are no~ within a depth of
6 feet.
(Ref. 11).
The hazard of ·erosion is very severe in bare,I unprotected areas
1/edowee sandy loam is a well drained soil. It is located on side
slopes and narrow ridges throughout the county. Areas, of this soil are
I
irregular oblong shaped and range from 4 to 40 acres inl size. Typically,
Wedowee soil has a grayish brown sandy loam surface that is about 2 inches
thick. A subsurface layer to a depth of 7 inches, is brownish yellow sandy
I
loam. The subsoil, to a depth of 31 inches, is a brownish yellow sandy
I
clay loam in the upper region, a strong brown sandy clay loam in the mid
region and a strong brown sandy clay in the lower region. The underlying
material, to a depth of 62 inches, is a multicolored saprolite that has a
sandy clay loam texture. 1/edowee soil has a moderate permeability and
I
shrink-swell potential. The water table and bedrock are not within a depth
of 6 feet. The soil is very acidic.
bare, unprotected areas (Ref. 11) .
The hazard of erbsion is severe in I
3.4 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION
There is evidence that the transmission shop is: a source of TCE
I
contamination; however, there may be additional sources c'ontributing to the
I
problem. Because the additional sources of TCE contamination could not be
identified at this time, the nsiten was defined as the groundwater plume
for purposes of determining
Thus, each distance ring was
human and environmental target populations.
I . I measured from the boundary, of the site. To
determine the total population within a 4-mile radius, the total land area
within each distance ring was multiplied by the 1990 1census figure for
persons per square mile for each respective jurisdictibn (i.e., City of
I I Gastonia and Gaston County). The total number of persons per square mile
in the City of Gastonia is 1,070 and 491 persons per squ,are mile is Gaston
County (Ref. 7). The table below summarizes the calculated total·
9
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
population (Ref. 6):
Radius
On-site
1/4-mile
1/2-mile
1-mile
2-mile
3-mile
4-mile
3.5 WATER SUPPLY
Population/Radii
19
248
566
2,020
6,695
11,660
15,687
Cumulative Population
19
267
833
2,853 ' 9,548
21,208
36,895
Most residents living within a 1/2 mile-radius of the Davis Park Road
TCE site are connected to either the Cedar Oak Park sutidivision community . I
well or private drinking water wells. The remaining residents, between 1/2
and 4 miles from the site are connected to
private/community wells. The Gaston \later
the Gaston Yater District, or
I
District dr~ws its water from
the South Fork Catawba River located northeast of the City. To determine
the number of residents relying on groundwater for drinking water, areas
. I
were measured with respect to distance. from site and loc_ation, outside the
Gaston \later District limits. These areas were then mul~iplied by 1070 for
' the City of Gastonia and 491 for Gaston County, the j 1990 U.S. Census
average residents per square mile in the respective l9cations (Ref. 7).
' The table below summarizes the calculations of residents living within 4 '
miles of the Davis Park Road TCE site that depend upon gtoundwater as their
source of drinking water (Ref. 12).
i Population Relying on Groundwater for Potable \later
Radius Population/Radii Cumulative Pcipulation
On-site 14 1J
' 1/ 4-mile 147 161
1/2-mile 235 396
1-mile 815 l,21~
2-mile 2,504 3,715
3-mile 5,683 9,398
4-mile 7,320 16, 718
10
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
3.6 LAND USE
Land use in the vicinity of the site is largely restdential with some
' industrial facilities. The nearest residence is located,less than SO feet
north-northwest of the site and the nearest school is 3,300 feet to the
east. These distances were determined from USGS Quadrangle maps and other
' reference maps (Ref. 1).
3.7 SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTS
There are no known critical habitats of Federally~listed endangered
species in the vicinity of the site. There are,; however, several
endangered and threatened species identified in the vicinity of the site I
including; the Indiana Bat, Bald Eagle, Arctic Peregrine Falcon, and
Eastern Cougar (Ref. 5). As for wetlands,
at the time this investigation was done;
no wetland m~ps were
I however b~ using
available
available
information, soils maps, soil classifications and USGS maps there appears
to be no wetlands in the area of the site (Refs. 11,27) .
11
I
'• I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
4.0 RECOlll!ENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Based on the available information, hazardous I substance have been
' detected in the Cedar Oak Park Subdivision well, in I addition to other
private wells located along or adjacent to Davis Park Road. The above
contamination cannot be
Trichloroethylene (TCE)
attributed to any one source. It is known that
detected in soil and Dichlorothylene (DCE) I were
samples collected from a drain pipe exiting the Moore's!Transmission Shop.
Concentrations were as high as 700 and 3,000 ppb, respectively. However, ' there are two other sources of TCE contamination locate1d within two miles
of the Davis Park
groundwater plume.
Road TCE Site that could
Because there are multiple
' be contributing to the
sources of contamination I
that are geographically close to one another and are affecting the same
I population drinking groundwater, G&O is recommending that the NCDEHNR
' aggregate these various sites into one "site• for evaluation purposes under
' the Federal Superfund Program. In addition, G&O is recommending that the '
site proceed to the next phase of
ultimate~y to the remedial action
Superfund site assessment process, and
stage since there is I a clear threat to
human health and the environment (Sampling results indicate that
concentrations of TCE were detected as high as 116. 3 ppb in August 1990 in
the Charles May residential drinking water well). Finally, emergency
response measures may be appropriate if contaminant' levels have not
decreased since the sampling events in 1990.
12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I \) \
I
n
D
I
.1
I
a
I
REFERENCES FOR DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
NCO 986 175 644 i
1. U.S Geological Survey, 7.5 minute series Topographi~ Quadrangle Maps of
North Carolina: Gastonia North 1973, Gastonia South 11970, Bessemer City
1973, and Kings Mountain 1971.
I
2. Climatic Atlas of the United States, US Department of Commerce,
National Climatic Center, Asheville, NC, 1979. I
I
3. Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States, Tech.nical Paper No. 40,
US Department of Commerce, Us Government Printing Office, Washington,
DC, 1963. I
I
4. Preliminary Explanatory Text for the 1985 Geologic Map of North
Carolina, November 4, 1988.
5. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Endangered and Thi;eatened Species of
the Southeastern United States, (Atlanta, Georgia, 1990). . i
6. Christopher Huff, Greenhorne & O'Mara, Population! calculations, Re:
Davis Park Road TCE Site, January 29, 1992. ,
I
7. 1990 United States Census, North Carolina Section.
8. Information package on the Catawba River by The
Resources Commission, Raleigh, North Carolina.
North
I
9. Memo from Bruce Nicholson
I
Carolina Wildlife
10. LeGrand, H.E. and Mundorff, M.J., U.S. Geological Survey and Department
of the Interior, Geology and Ground Water in the Ch~rlotte Area, North
Carolina, Bulletin Number 63, February 1952. I
11. General Soil Maps of the Gaston County, North Caroli~a, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Ashevill 1e, North Carolina,
May 1989. \
12. Christopher Huff, Greenhorne & O'Mara, Calculation! of population on
groundwater, Re: Davis Park Road TCE Site, March 19, [1992.
I
13. Site Discovery Form, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health,
and Natural Resources, May 1, 1990. I !
14. Letter to Doug Lair, U.S. EPA, Emergency Response ahd Removal Branch,
Atlanta, from Pat De Rosa, North Carolina Departmen't of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources, Superfund Section, Ju~e 27, 1990. I I
15. Telephone memo with Chris DeRoller, North Carolina Department of
Environment, Hea 1th and Natural Resources, Mooresv:i 11 e Office, from
Christopher Huff, Greenhorne & O'Mara, February 6, 19,92.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
R
g
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
16. Memo to file from site visit at Moore's Transmission Shop, Gastonia,
North Carolina, from Ed Wallingford, North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Superfund Section. I
17. Memo to file, telephone conversation with Roy Moor~, owner of Moore's
Transmission Shop, from Bruce Nicholson, North Car'ol ina Department of
Environment, Health, and Natura 1 Resources, Superfurid Section, February
18, 1991. '
' 18. Memo to file, telephone conversation with Roy Moore, owner of Moore's
Transmission Shop, from Ed Wa 11 i ngford, North Caro 1 i na Department of
Environment, Hea 1th, and Natural Resources, Superfund Section, August
8, 1990. I
19. Notice of to Carl Bell, owner of Moore's Transmission Shop building, of
Federal Requirements For Release of Petroleum· from Commercial
Underground Storage Tank, from the North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental I Management, February 12, 1991.
20. Notice that the Davis Park Road Site is being placed on the Federal
Superfund Program, January 22, 1991. ·
21. Letter to Kelly Cain, North Carolina Project Leader, 1,U.S. EPA Region IV
Waste Division, from Lee Crosby, North Carol iha Department of
Environment, Hea 1th, and Natura 1 Resources, Superfund Section,
requesting that the Davis Park Road TCE site be placed in the CERCLIS
Program, June 27, 1990. \
I
22. Memo to file, telephone conversation with Barbara Christian, DEM,
Moores vi 11 e and Broyce Hunt, Gaston County Health Department,
concerning TCE contamination of Cedar Oak Park ~ubdivision water
supply, June 19, 1990. '
23. Letter to Pat DeRosa, North Carolina Department of Environment, Health,
and Natura 1 Resources, Superfund Section, from Don I Rigger, On-scene
Coordinator of Emergency Response and Removal Branch~ U.S. EPA Region
IV, analytical results from samples taken on July 6, 1990, July 27,
1990.
24. North Carolina Public Water System Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL),
September 1990.
I 25. Memo from Bruce Nichol son, North Carolina Department of Environment,
.Health, and Natural Resources, Superfund Section, to Lee Crosby, North
Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources,
Superfund Section, concerning TCE contamination of a well at the Cedar
Oak Park Subdivision, Gastonia, North Carolina, May 1,11990.
I
26. Telephone memo with James Thompson Gaston County Health Department from
Christopher Huff, Greenhorne & O'Mara, Concerriing groundwater
contamination of wells in the immediate area around the Davis Park Road
TCE site, February 10, 1992.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
27.
28.
29.
Memo to Superfund Section Staff from Hal Bryson; NC Superfund Branch, August 17,
1992. Update on Well Head Protection Program in N.C ..
FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map, City of Gastonia, North Ca~olina. January IS, 1982.
Sample locations and approximate extent of contamination by Greenhorne & O'Mara,
Inc ..
I
I
I I
I
I I I I
I
I I
I ' I I
I
I
I
I REFERENCE 1
~
~
~
~
□
□
□
1U
u
11 ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I SEE APPENDIX A FIGURE 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I REFERENCE 2 I
'
I
I I
I
I I
I
I I '
I
~
I
I
D
D
A N'N//AJ.
5 \.
{----) t.U I TH /A.lo;E5
,l:v,,1 PoAn -r1{)AI /.506-R,,✓n:S
'> -.-) ,,,._,,-n-, /NCt,'E:S ol" Er;t?t,J2n"T10-V G,tJ/cN
/TY t/A.K.,1,:;.>CLEP A.ltJM/!,EJCS.
" ! ,_
Feo,.,,:
1/IE (.),</1//ER.SlrY OP NC 1'£c'SS 1
(:.M,'fl'i!/.. /1'1,t.l I PC. J rl&,t,/.RJZ
5, 15 pP<i,~ IOI A ,vp F16 vJ2~
.S,Z.o ,'J/J6£ /tJ3.
/Yl~3,"'1 /JAllvol
fr1 c. a ,,., /1,1,ivaf
/Jd A ,.,i V C-I
Prcc~p-;
w,y. -------
Pree¥• ,.
I
I
I
I
. I I
I
I
I
I
I REFERENCE 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
{
Technical
No. t,O
, ·, p~:1•,111nn:r-,T OF C:OMMEIIC:E
.,
I i
,I
"EATlll•:1: IIIIHEA,,
1·.•·. ll,1,11.1:,1111111.1,,;,1
TECIINICAL PAPEH NO. 11.fl
JlAINFALt FHEQUENCY A'l'LAS OF 'l'JIE IJNl'J'EJ) S'IA'l'ES
fnr Durulious fro111 30 Minute.; lo 2tf. I lours ,11ul
Rclur11 Periods fro111 I lo ] 00 Years
,.,,,_, .. ., _ .. ,
HA\111 M. lffH!'-lfflt].U
...
1:._,1a<Tr"'°• lli•I'"'°"', ."-II f••--'••1"'"4. Sr,•&.r
I .!'I.. llr...-,1•••"' •f \•,&.·Nl1•n
\
\
PRCPERTY OF EPA
FIT IV
{/,vc_v.vTR.0 £.l..€P l7'A ekll DOU.$
A Vfe.2$ M~,uu-£. (n'w-10)
I
u
I
E
I
I
I
I
'
I I
I
I I
REFERENCE 4 I
I
I
I I
' I
' ~ I
~ I
I
I g I
I
□ I
D
D
u
u
PRELIMINARY EXPLANATORY TEXT iFOR THE
1985 GEOLOGIC MAP OF NORTH CAROLINA
Contractual Report 88-l
by
I
The North Carolina Geological Survey
November 4,1988
I i ,,
PIEDMONT
Overview
The Piedmont is an inclined plain characterized by gently rolling
topography. The effects of lithology and rock structu~ on topography are
mostly subtle. Noticeable effects include ridges underlain by hard rock such
as Abner Mountain in Montgomery County and distinctive istream patterns such
as that in western Stanly County.. The rocks of the Piedmont are, for the
most part, metamorphosed and deeply weathered. Outcrops are most co=on
in stream bottoms and on the steeper slopes and, convers:ely, deep weathering
is most common on the uplands. In many locales, the thickness of weathered
material can vary greatly over a few tens of feet. Some I rock types, such as
argillite in the Carolina Slate belt are not deeply weathered which results in
shallow soil and saprolite, but no one has systematicly studied the
relationship between rock types and thickness of weathered material.
I
King (1955) subdivided the Piedmont into belts on the basis of lithologies
and structure. Subsequent authors found it useful I to continue King's
scheme, adopting additional belts into general use. On the legend of the 1985
Geologic Map of North Carolina, belts of the Piedmont are' grouped as follows:
Kings Mountain belt; Inner Piedmont belt, Chauga \ belt, Smith River
allochthon, and Sauratown Mountains anticlinorium; Charlotte and Milton belts;
Carolina Slate belt; Raleigh belt; and Eastern Slate belt. Some pervasive
metamorphic, tectonic, or plutonic events were imposed across several belts.
For example, groups of intrusions of similar age and tectonic history may
have individual bodies scattered throughout the belts and a particular belt
may contain igneous intrusive bodies from several age groups .(see Fullagar,
1971). r I
The Kings Mountain Belt
I
The Kings Mountain belt was defined by King (1955). This belt has
been much studied because of its variety of rock t~es and its mineral
wealth. Important early work includes Keith and Sterrett (1931) and Kesler
(1944). Kesler (1955) wrote a brief summary of the Kings Mountain belt.
Overstreet and Bell (1965) described the rocks of the Kings Mountain belt in
South Carolina in detail. More recently, Horton, Butler', and Milton (1981)
edited a guidebook for the Carolina Geological Society that represented the
most complete coverage of the belt up to that time. 1
The Kings Mountain belt is a sequence of m~tasedimentary and
metavolcanic rock of generally lower metamorphic grade ~han the bordering
Inner Piedmont and Charlotte Belt. In contrast to the Inner Piedmont belt
and the Charlotte belt, the stratigraphy is relatively well known. This is
because of the nature of the rocks and the intense study they have received.
Zbt BATTLEGROUND FORMATION
The following description was condensed from Horton'. (1983). The unit
is divided into lower part and upper part. The lower part is metavolcanic,
mostly dacitic to andesitic rocks (hornblende gneiss, lfeldspathic biotite,
gneiss, and phyllitic to schistose volcaniclastic rocks) interlayered with and
grading laterally and upward to quartz-sericite schist. i The upper part
consists of quartz-sericite schist, kyanite and sillimanite quartzite, I quartz-pebble metaconglomerate (at least three beds of mrtaconglomerate are
51
I
I
I
D
Piedmont as well as the Kings Mountain belt.
PPmg FOLIATED TO MASSIVE GRANITIC ROCK
' This map unit occurs in the Raleigh belt and the Eastern Slate belt as
well as the Kings Mountain belt and includes the High Shoals, Rolesville,
Wise, Lemon Springs, Butterwood Creek, and Rocky Mount granites.
Goldsmith and others (1988) described the High Shoals granite as a
coarse-grained, porphyritic, well-foliated biotite granite.\ A review of other
papers that include descriptions of one or more of these bodies shows that
some of the rock bodies are composed of several intrusive phases exhibiting
cross-cutting relationships and differing in texture and :degree of foliation.
The rocks are megacrystic to equigranular granite to qua,rtz monzonite. For
more information see Parker (1979), Speer and others (1980), Campbell
(1985), and Bolton (1985).
Jd DIABASE
' Burt and others (1978) complied a map of this rock type that illustrates
its wide distribution throughout the Piedmont and Triassic basins. They
described it as dark-gray to greenish-black, fine-to medium-grained material
with plagioclase, augite, and olivine as the primary minerals. Ragland and
others (1983) reported that a subordinate number of dikes contain quartz
instead of olivine. This rock type occurs as thin sheet-like bodies most
commonly steeply dipping or vertical and cross-cutting but rarely
sub-horizontal especially in the Durham area. For further description of
diabase see the section on Triassic Basins. Some diabase \dikes and adjacent
fractured rocks are conduits for the movement of groundwater. • I •
Inner Piedmont Belt, Chauga Belt, Smith River Alloclithon, and
Sauratown Mountains Anticlinoriu.m
' The Inner Piedmont belt was described by Oversireet and Griffitts
(1955). Overstreet and Bell (1965) published a detailed \description of the
Inner Piedmont belt of South Carolina that is somewhat applicable to North
Carolina. Griffin (1971) further described the Inner Piedmont belt, especially
of South Carolina, with emphasis on structure and tectonics. In spite of the
earlier work, Butler (1972) felt that the geology of the I*ner Piedmont belt
was poorly known. The work of Goldsmith and others (1988) on the Charlotte
1 ° x 2° sheet added significantly to what we. know about \he Inner Piedmont
belt, but Butler's (1972) opinion is still valid. This I lack of detailed
understanding of the Inner Piedmont belt is related to lcomplexity of the
structure, lack of recognizable primarily stratigraphic 'features, lack of
distinctive marker beds, deep weathering, and, not least,1 lack of a strong
economic impetus to study the rocks. Goldsmith and others (1988) gave a
detailed summary of the Inner Piedmont belt. Many of the; significant points
of their summary are condensed in the following paragraph. '
The stratified rocks are predominantly thinly layered_ mica schist and
gneiss. These are interlayered with amphibolite, calc-silicate rock,
hornblende gneiss, quartzite and rare marble. There are I two stratigraphic
suites, a predominantly mafic lower suite which occupies the flanks of the
Inner Piedmont belt and the upper suite of interlayered mica schist, biotite
paragneiss, and minor calc-silicate rock which occupies I the core. With
respect to metamorphic grade, the core is cparacterized by
sillimanite-muscovite and the flanks by staurolite-kyanite. , Many masses of
53
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
~
a
B
E
E
I
I
I
I
I
REFERENCE 5
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9/26/91
Federally Listed Species by State
~ NORTH CAROLINA
(E = Endangered; T
Mammals
Threatened; CH= Critical Habitat determined
I
Bat, gray (Myotis qrisescens) -

E

Bat, Indiana (Myotis sodalis) -

E

Bat, Virginia big-eared.
(Plecotus townsendii virginianus) -

E

Cougar, eastern (Felis concolor couguar) -

E

Manatee, West Indian (Trichechus manatus) -

E

Shrew, Dismal Swamp southeastern
(Sorex longirostris fisheri) -

T

Squirrel, Carolina northern flying
(Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus) -E
Whale, finback (Balaeno te~a physalus) -

E

Whale, humpback Meqaptera novaeangliae) -

E

Whale, right (Balaena glacial is) -E
Whale, sei (Balaenoptera boreal is) -

E

Whale, sperm (Physeter catodon) -E
Birds
Eagle, bald (Hal iaeetus leucocephalus) -

E

Falcon, American peregrine
(Falco peregrinus anatum) -E
Falcon, Arctic peregrine
(Falco pereqrinus tundrius) -

T

Plover, piping (Charadrius melodus) -

T

Stork, wood (Mycteria americana) -E
Warbler, Bachman's (Vermivora bachmanii) -

E

Warbler, Kirtland's (Dendroica
k i rt 1 and i i ) -E
Woodpecker, ivory-billed
(Campephilus principal is) -

E

Woodpecker, red-cockaded
(Picoides [=Dendrocopos] borealis) -E
General Distribution
Extreme Southwest
West '
Avery 'County
Entire State
Coastal waters
Di sma 11 Swamp; Camden,
Gates, Pasquotank, and
Perqui~ans Counties
I
Western mountains
(Yancyl, Buncombe,
Haywooa, Swain, and
Mitchell Counties)
Coasta~ waters
Coastal waters
Coasta) waters
Coastal waters
Coastal waters
Entire
1
state
Western mountains
·Entire,State
Coast ,
Coast
East
Northwest, Central,
Southeast
Southe~st
East
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NORTH CAROLINA (Cont'd)
Reptiles
Alligator, American
(Alligator mississippiensis) T (S/A)*
Turtle, Kemp's (Atlantic) ridley
(Lepidochelys kempii) -E
Turtle, green (Chelonia mvdas) -T
Turtle, hawksbill (Eretmochelvs imbricata)
Turtle, leatherback (Dermochelvs coriacea)
Turtle, loggerhead (Caretta caretta) -T
Fishes
Chub, spotfin (Hybopsis monacha) -T,CH
Shiner, Cape Fear
(Notropis mekistocholas) -E,CH
Silverside, Waccamaw (Me~idi2 exte~sa) -T
Sturgeon, shortnose (Acipenser
brevirostrum) -E
'
Mollusks
Mussel, Tar River spiny
(Elliptic [Canthyria] steinstansana) -E
-E
-E
Snail, noonday (Mesodon clarki nantahala) -T
Pl ants
Geum radiatum (Spreading avens) -E
State,Lists 9/26/91
I General Distribution
' Coastal plain
Coastal waters
Coasta1l waters
Coasta1l waters
Coasta1l waters
Coasta1l waters
I Little1Tennessee River,
Swain and Macon Counties
I Randolph, Moore, Lee,
Harnett, and Chatham
Counties
Lake Waccamaw and Upper
Waccamaw R., Columbus
County,
Coastal rivers
I
Tar Ri v,er, Edgecombe
County;! Sandy Creek,
Frankl i.n County; Swift
Creek, Nash County
I
Swain County
Ashe, Avery, Transylvania
Watauga\ Buncombe, and
Yancey Counties
*Alligators are biologically neither endangered nor threatened. For law
enforcement purposes they are classified as "Threatened due to Similarity
of Appearance." Alligator hunting is regulated in acc6rdance with State
law. -
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
NORTH CAROLINA (Cont'd)
•
. Helonias bullata (Swamp pink) T
Hedyotis purpurea var. montana
(Roan Mountain bluet) - E
Hexastylis maniflora
(Dwarf-flowered heartleaf) - T
Hellanthus schweinitzii
(Schweinitz's sunflower) -(E)
Hellonias bullata (Swamp pink) - T
Hudsonia montana (mountain golden
heather) -T,CH
Jsotria medeoloides (small whorled
pagan i a) -E
Liatris helleri (Heller's blazing star) - T
Lindera melissifolia (pondberry) -E
Lysimachia asperulaefolia (rough-leaved
loosestrife) -E
Oxypolis canbvi (Canby's dropwort) -E
Ptilimnium nodosom (harperella) -E
Saqittaria fasiculata (bunched
arrowhead) -E
Sarracenia oreoohila (green pitcher
plant) -E
Sarracenia rubra ssp. ionesii
(mountain sweet pitcher plant) -E
Sisyrinchium dichotomum
{white irisette) - E
Solidago spithamaea (Blue Ridge
goldenrod) - T
3
State Lists 9/26/91
General Distribution
'
Jackson; Transylvania,
Henderson Counties
Ashe, Watauga, Avery, and
Mitche 11\ Counties
Cleveland, Catawba, Burke,
Rutherfo'.rd, and Lincoln
Counties,
Stanly, tabarrus, Union
Mecklenberg, Rowan Counties
I
Jackson,, Henderson,
Transylvania Counties
Burke and McDowell Counties
Macon and Henderson
Counties'
Ashe, Avery, Caldwell,
Burke Counties
Bladen County
I
' Carteret,1 Scotland, ' C:..;mber12:nd: Bladen,
Bruns•11icl<, Pender, and
:'oke, and Onslow Counties
Scotland 'County
Granville and Chatham
Counties
Henderson. County
Clay Count:,
' HenC2rson 1 :aid Transylvania
Counties
Folk, Henderson, and
Rutherfc1·d Counties
I
jl •••r•: ,n~1u•tc~•ll -~ -• ~ <-,U •i'l 1 11-
Counti es
I
I
I I
i I I
I
I I
' I
I I
I
I I
I
I
I
I REFERENCE 6
I
I
~
~
I
D
E
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I
I
-------------------
POPULATION WITHIN 4 MILES OF THE DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
DISTANCE FROM
SITE !MILES)
ON-SITE
0 -1/4
1/4 -1/2
1/2 -l
1-2
2-3
3-4
TOTAL:
Prepared by: Cbri!f.oprer Huff
Greenb~ & O'Mlm
___ Raleigb,_Ncrth Oirolina.
GASTONIA, NORTH CAROLINA
NCD 986 175 644
POPULATION DENSITY, PEOPLE PER SQUARE MILE
GASTON COUNTY: 491 GASTONIA CITY: 1070
AREA IN SQUARE MILES POPULATION
GASTON COUNTY GASTONIA CITY GASTON COUNTY GASTONIA CITY
0.04 0.00 19 0
0.31 0.09 152 96
0.48 0.31 235 331
1.61 1.15 790 1,230
7.34 2.89 3,603 3,092
10.37 6.14 5,091 6,569
15.02 7.77 7.374 8.313
35.17 18.35 17,264 19,631
CUMULATIVE
TOTAL
19
267
833
2,853
9,548
21,208
36.895
36,895
Date: 20-Feb-92
I
I
I
I
~
~
~
~
□ REFERENCE 7
□
D
0
0
D
0
u
u
u
u
I T oble I 5. land Area and Population Density: 1990-Con. [for 6"~ al -onc1-.. of'~--,..-r! I State County lond o,.., +------1·S~ County I ,...1,0tt\pt'<-I I I I I I County Subdivision Pio<• [)a...-(ounfy ••• __________________ • __ _ (ok,t,oln lownship ---····--·--·--·-·· ~~-'~wp-==:::::::====:::: f""1on low,'1$hip. ••-• ·•·---•••••••••• Je<v1,0lfffl ,,,...-.st,;p ·····--··········· . ~ ,_,, --···········-----Mooovilt ._, (pl.) Modsvilt ~--········--------Mod<sde .,_. (pl.I 51-ody c.r-tow,nsho •••••••••••••••• ~;~-=: :::::: :: :::: :::: ~ ..,c.:;:'41~:: ::::: :::::::: ~ '°'"" --------------------fG5011 '°"""----------------------Mount~ 1'IMft {pt.)-------------Geson ~ -------············· t,Jond U'ffl ~ -·········------~ ,_ ----········------,toe:t,r,, ,_ --------------------Walca !own (pf.) •••••••••••••••• ~ ~---------------·-l'.enonl. lown ------------------1.imnlont Township •••••••••••••••••• ~ '°'""' -------------------MoQnOio township ---··········-----Maono'a IOWII ••••••••••••••••••• Rodtfish township---·········-------H<n!h fOWII (pt.) _______________ _ w~ town (pt.I----------------l!o$.e ~ township __________________ _ Row~'--------··-·······---Smilh township ••••••••••••••••••••• Wo,w,,, I~ ••••••••••••••••••• I w~ ,_ -··················· Wolha~ ~ ••••••........... [)urt,om (OlM'lty ············-----------Ul'l to,,w,,~ ----------------------I I Dumem lcrwnst.p • Durham city (p.) Pvrtwood CDP {l)t_J _______________ _ L,ebat,on h;,wnship ········--·-----··-Durtaom city (pl.) ····----------·-· Moogum township ••• ···---------···· ec-. r.r-~ ·····--·-········ Durhorn city (pl.) ·-··----·-······· Gonnor! CDP···---··············· Trianqlt 1~------········------0iapel Hil lo-(pl.) ··-·····---·--~ city (pl.) --Monisvilt tvwn (pt.I Ptrlwood CDP (pl.1 •••••• ---------· I E~. cu~------············ Prine~,_-----··········----Tort,o,o tow,, --··-····---··--·---T~ 2. t-(D',,10. ___________ _ I I I Cotwt~ tow,,···-····----------·· fo-,~ 3. ~ Co,,t-10. ___________ _ ~ '-------·~----·-········ Tc-,ship A. Ottp C--. ·········-----TOl'fflShip 5, t-~ Crlfft •• _____ _ ~ town ••••• _ •••• ---·-------To-<1-hip 6. ~ F.shnQ Crtte. _______ _ Whilol..-i ,_ (pU •• -----------·· T~ 7, s...t1 Cr1'N--·········--·-SotTWboro 10wn wt) ······--------Rody Moun! city (,pl.)••··•--·-----1~ 8. 5porto ••••• -------·-----Town~ 9, One< C--. ------········ Moc~sf,c,ld rown ·········-··--··· To-,omhip 10. l.-T°'""' C--.-··-----FlrwtOpl; ,_.,. ~····-··------------,_il,ip II. woi,..,, Cr"°'--------···· T~ 12, ioct<-r lilou<'I •• _ •••••••• -R,;,d:y Mount c,,y t;,t.) ••••••• ------T<rwnship ll. Col"'·--·············· To,,,mhip U, Upp,-< •-(,"°' ...•.•.. Shorpsbun,1 lo-,,,n (;:.1 •• __ ••••••••• -1 10<~~.~-•--..o···-·-----·--·-H-9hi>o,,n1c,ty (p1' •••• ____ •••• _ ••• i::!'me<S....a, IOW"I '7.)·-----••··-••• ~ Go<Of'<I (OP ~11 .......•...•• ~ C,ttt ,~ --·········-··-I lktt.o,,;a I~.·•···•····-···-···-R.,..ol Holl 10-••••••••••••• ··-·--S1onl.-Y"'lr (Df lt:" 1. ••• ·---····--· 6to,:,,,dboy to-U'>Cl --······-···--·-·· ~ Go,,k,n CO. ,pr.L •••••••••• __ Cl.<nmon,.-.lr !o...,v-<: ••••••••• ---·--(1,,m,-r-.oo\ "'"°9<' _;• l.·-········-·-1 ~ .......... ,...ii.,_. Kt<,.,..lvollt '°""' ~;;-) ..... -.... -. ·-~ Got&.,, CD-' ~• L •••••• ·-··--l~.-.llt 10........,.;p •. (1,,m,,,oos~ ;•I t,...,;,...,ri.,. ([)f' •• . --··. ---·----.,,,._ 27 85~ I 786 ' ,.. 7990 I 631 "" '" 7 0lA "" 2'98 39 "' 1 )59 "" 3 170 '" 701 I I 008 7,.. "' '" 2 911 3 616 85' 5 A17 933 I 912 "' I 185 2 2763 I 267 I 893 "" 2 8S9 1 022 181 835 "" 138 578 136 527 ' 13 882 " 3 901 12 A26 33 , ... 11 Oil I 115 " 4 121 ,.,,. 16 IU I 652 11 037 I 55J m n, " ... I •81 ,., I 7,. ... 3 "' ,., 1 333 1 7•8 "' 3193 1 514 1 597 10 232 17 057 1 A71 1 171 70 265 678 11 .,.. ' IS1 "" , 3S7 12 671 1 652 • 617 1 110 .,, 8 833 s "" 21 99~ 10 '8< 17 IL ~S '" J 106 Sq.,,., ktlo '-• ~·· """ "6.9 265.2 96.l 31.2 110.5 ,2.1 141.7 "·' 71,6 21.1 83.8 32.A 1.0 8 .2 .I 122.2 A1.1 12.8 •9 60.8 2).5 2 118.2 817.8 99.1 38 2 215.8 83.3 195.0 75.3 2., 1.0 2.1 .8 91.5 353 2A2.2 93.5 ,.1 1.6 ,., .8 <6 1.8 278.:Z 107.• ,, 1.9 251.6 97.1 3.2 1.1 1"3.A 55.• V 1.0 IJ..4.1 SU .7 .3 M.6 24.9 33 1.3 121.9 A7.I !AS.I 5'.0 6.6 25 135.8 52.• 752.7 190.6 63.1 1A.~ 100.J 77.J 175,6 67,8 ·' 80.0 30.9 .1 .I 178,7 69.0 113 '-4J,8 1.8 I.I 8.0 3.1 111.2 A5.3 ,.. 6 .8 J I 52 1.0 I 308 I 505.1 96,7 31 . .t 1.7 1.0 23.5 9.1 104.6 A0.5 .9 • 148,7 57.l .7 .3 87.0 lJ.6 92.8 35.8 1.8 ·' 140,9 ,. . 1.0 ·' 138.5 53.5 3 I 1.1 • 102.7 3•U 63.6 24,6 13 ., ., s 2•.5 1.6 1.0 .,, 2•5 "·' 38.• 15.2 59 73.9 26.5 32.1 12.• .3 ·' 1 061.0 409.7 ", 34,6 ·' 1.3 .s , .• 1.9 783 30.2 78,7 30,4 l6 1.0 '" " "8 18. l 10 8 41.9 18 S I 1.9 ., 80.1 30, 17,4 6.1 81,8 J3' 1 ' 9.S " I SUMMARY POPULATION AND HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS ,_, __ ,_., -·· .... .. , 105.0 16.5 '8.0 n.1 ,. ' "·' 1"6.1 22.6 ,. 9 5U 1'3,1 "85.5 I 213.8 57,4 1"8.6 265.5 693.7 37.8 97.8 18.9 ... , 13.7 35.6 12.5 32.A 16.3 A1.I 191.4 "81.0 318.6 876.3 11.0 "·' 31.3 81.2 121.9 320.0 116 2 305.0 632.8 I 617.2 13.0 33.7 17A.7 •SO.S 21.6 55.9 291,6 777.5 ll.8 35.6 276.7 7A1.0 8.8 22.9 1.9 ,., -A2.8 111.0 390.0 9900 15.5 ... 2 "' 9A.6 '33.2 l 1"3.6 1A.9 38.6 2Al.6 625.7 32.1 BJ., 691.9 1792.7 777.5 2 01).7 20.0 173.5 .. ,, 80.0 160.0 21.8 56.6 109.6 183.7 11.8 30.0 136.3 3Sl.6 9A.0 2'3.1 196.A l 8S8.3 22.5 60.0 792.5 2 060.5 43,2 112.0 "" '31.7 611.9 I 652.0 "69.7 l 212.9 l'-.8 38.3 32A.A 730.0 .., 12.6 125.7 293.3 9.2 23.9 16.0 '-I.A 600 IS-t.3 12.• 32.2 .... o 1 160.0 n., 60.8 933.l 2 800.0 13,0 ll.6 27.4 71.1 379.2 9&.0 51.9 tJ..4.A S82.3 t 51A.0 25.2 65.2 103, 526.9 I 122.2 2 891.0 19.9 Sl.6 36.5 9A.A 233.l 100.0 250,6 1,.,19.0 136.9 359.A 600 116.9 3(1'0 310. I NI.A '" 1-U.J 16\.0 416.8 635.• l 1>52.0 218.1 711.• '"' 0 •'29.J 238.5 596 3 18-ol.A •71.S •88.2 l 262.8 U• t, 111,8 614 0 S94.6 131 ,0 339 .• I 0SS 0 7 110 0 337 5 ""'s County Subdivision Place , ....... fonylh eo..,ty-Col ......... ,,.,..,. ................ 11 51,;riry-Ae (I)P (plJ ••••••• --------:-:::-~ ""<¢\·:::::::::::: I Old tichmond ,ow,,s!,ip ______ ••••••••• Kn;i city (pf.I···-····-·-········· Old ,_, io,,,m.t,;p --·········--···-· 51~ (I)P Ip!.) •••••••••• -•••• Wll\$1on-5olem city (pl.I •••••••••••• S..... Chapel~............... I Waa...rto.n ~ (pl.) ••••••.•••••• South f'Oli I~ ••••••••••••••••• Wnston-S.-.. uly (pl.) ·-·-··-··-·· ~:, "::Z,·::::::::::::::::::: I WftJ~Saiem uly (pl.} ••••• : •••••• Frriir, c-ty ···-···--------········ Towrtship I.°"""--·-··············· 6uM "'--··-------··-········-· Tc,wnsh;p 2. Kclnu •••••••••••••••••• T~ 3. Y~ •••••••••••••• y~ ,._, ·······--------·--T~ A. frmllinlon •••• --···-····· frninton ,._, ---------···--···· Townshp 5. ~ -·• T~ 6. 5onctv Cr.el • Township 7. Gold Mir>t ••••••••••••••• Cent~'°""'-----·--····-·····-T~ 8. Cedcw Rod.. •••••••••••••• Townshici 9. Cypras Crt'tt ····----·-·-Towns,hip 10, uiuisb.rrv ••••••• ---···--l.ouisbr.,r-g '°""' ············-------Gcs!on eo..r.ty_ ...••••••••••.•....•..• ~ townshii:i---···--·--------· Oletry.-ilt city .•••••••• -----------~ town·····-·---·-·······-~ Mot.w-,toin luwnship __ ••••••••• ~ City city _________ •••••••• Goitonio city {pl.) ••••••••••• ------1::''"'JS Mounloin city lf,1,) ••••• -------Dolm township ••••••••••••• ---·-··· Dolm town ....... ---·----·-----· Gcs!onio city""·'·-----------····· ltigh Shoab cily •••• ------····-···· l!oNo ,own {pl.I····--------·····-5tcnty ,_, (plJ ••••••• ---··--·-· Gcis!Ol'.a ~-----------······-· Gosl(n(I city {pl_) __________ • _____ _ l..owtl city (pl.l •• --------········· tooio town (pl.1.---··-·····--·-·-South Gostcna CDP •••••••• __ • ____ _ 5per,cT, Mo,..m,i;,, ,0,,,-,, {pl.) ________ _ ~ t~ ••·•••··-•-•··•••• Moun! Moiy iily (f,1.l •• ------······ ~ Mounu,., Town {pl.)_ •••••••• St,rky lowri {pl,) __ •••••••••••• _._ South Point tOWT"<Ship ____ ··-·····-·---~t city------·-······-·--·--Crr,mt,rton town ----········-··---Gcis1onio cily {pl.I •• ---------······ towel city (p!J •• ---------········ McAdmville -·----·-·····-----Mout,1 Holly city {pl_)_ ••• _ •••• -----Gain (o..ily ·····--·--·········-----Gai~ ~ ··-··----·--------Gain...alt town·······-·---------· Hol towni.l-op ---·······--·----····· Hown tow-n1,hip •••• ·------•••• ___ •• Holy Grow 1ow,-,!J-,ip _________ ·----··-Ho.,rttn Mil township----··-····-·---Mirl!OftSwle 1°""'"""" ·····-····-----· R~ '~-·---··-········· G<ohom (ovnly ----••• ·······-----•••• Chf.ool, low,,v,ip ___ ·--•••••••-------Roi.>l:,im .... town·-·-·······-------Sonrttlloh Town Ip!.)······------·· Sfftoah lownshi;, •••··•••····-•--••• Y ...... (rttt IO~·-·-·--··••• $on!tttlol, IOWl'I jpt,) ·••· Gmn·..-ille (ovnly --······---------· B,o,,i.fit>ldto~ Du,,......,..,~-··-··--···· But""' CDP--···-·-·---···· ----· ----C,ttdmoo< otv ••• ····-·-··---··-fiv,in,, C,"~ town.i.ip. ···--·----·-·-0•f0<d <•Ty (pt) Onlt. Hil to-,,my.i, .... 0,fo,d 10,,,n,t,;p _. -··-···-·--·. ----0,lo,d my (pt,) Soio<nlown\h,p .••••• So ... ot,o, f0<l ,0....,,,..;p 51cr;oll 1own ····-lolly Ho 10-\h,p Sltm t°""' Woio-.,t r .. ov~ ,o-,,.,_,p .. .... ····-····-... .... . "" 151 IIJ " A 69A 5 107 10 53 .... I 087 8333 9 .,. 1'3 A71 1'3 Al8 36 AIA .,,. ,.. 31,()9 '"' "' '970 I 615 I 516 2 ,,. I 390 "' "" I 272 1 911 3 037 175 093 "°" "" 10 I IA All "" I ~ 18 373 1 J 012 605 "' I 75 S.5 ~ 119 I 650 I s A87 I 15 I 19 AOS I As~ I 2 351 33 191 , 8 A3A I 2 311 "' I ,, .. 830 3 191 9 305 , 780 I JOO I 2S3 I I 020 I I 636 I 269 I 007 I 3'0 I 1 t96 56H 709 •1 "' '" , IJ8 3•5 ' • l53 110 029 4 679 I 50< I;~{ I 560 I 6 573 • ,-1 1 181 I 1 186 . <(J7 3 1 .. I 2t9 1 }1 ~ land 0tl'O S,q,.,o,, l,lo-~•• A2.6 ' ' 17.8 ' 12.5 .2 ·' 91.9 19 61.2 ·' 76.l laJ.8 laJ.7 I 273.7 129.7 ,., IA9.6 122.6 .., 1a...1 ,.o 87.3 131.5 102.1 7 119.9 92.8 153.7 ,, nl.'-169,4 9 .• .I 126 J ,., • 8 151.3 37 •.O ·' 9 182.8 n.6 .I 1.8 '" .9 1 ..... 12.0 • ,.1 149.1 14.9 93 .7 " " " 882.2 118 l I.I 13'.2 BO 0 l'-3.7 180 • 90.6 130 0 756, .. 1s J 1.1 ' 1.:5 9 185 3 I )75 7 1060 131, B '" s. '" 1 " 15)3 1:;..i 0 ., ,. 3 :n e " 19] 0 7. '};] .....,,.,_ \ .. •• '\~: , .. '(;,. '\ ,_. I ,_, --,_, .......... -16.5 215.0 55S.2 .3 217.1 5067 .3 lAl.3 376.7 -JO I 603 155.9 .I -,., 227.0 S87.0 .I 500 100.0 530.0 339 .... 179.9 I.I 370 988.2 n., 136.2 353.1 .. --"·' 12A.2 321.A no 780.6 2 020.7 70.9 7'0.7 2 022.8 .f9l.6 186 7A.1 ,o I "·' "·' ., 260.0 728.0 "·' 24.I "·' A7.3 38.2 99.0 .6 282.7 706.7 71.1 37.9 9'0 .. 1!107.5 2 018.B JJ.7 n., A5,0 "'·' 16.A ,2.A "·' 13.6 35.3 .3 16'.3 383.3 4.3 16.A A2.5 35.8 13.7 3S.5 59.3 51.5 133.5 1.9 619.8 l S9fl.A 3!)6,5 189.6 '91.1 65.A BJ.0 215.l 3.6 506.0 1 371.l .I 100.0 100.0 '8.8 IIA.1 295.3 ,., 510.7 l J..42.3 .2 915.0 I 830.0 .3 9A5.0 2 570.0 ,., 121.A 31A,6 '·' 81".I 2 151.A --1.8 131.5 33'.I ---·' 517.8 1 165.0 70.6 AIJ.3 l 070.0 29.9 691.A 1 810.0 .I -I.I 589.3 l 500.0 6.7 315.3 819.0 .3 127.8 383.3 55.8 13",A J..47.8 •.6 376.6 982.A .1 500 100.0 ,., 561.2 1 A73.I 57.6 2n.3 578.0 ,.1 "60 I A1'9.6 3.6 2>4.9 658,6 .3 352.9 823.3 2.6 ""'·' I OAO.0 ,., 230.6 592.9 2.1 569.8 l 519.5 ,.., 10.S 27.3 A5.7 15.0 38.9 ' 280,0 770.0 53.8 90 23.3 J0.9 12.8 33.0 55.5 11.A "·' 69.6 7.0 18.2 J~.o 11.1 28.8 ,01 10.3 26.7 192.1 9.5 24.6 16-t.2 13.3 "·' .. 590.8 I 772.5 .1 8'0 210,0 56.3 66 17.0 11.5 3.1 82 531.2 27.9 n., 79,6 21.1 ><.7 ,, 8 73,3 189,9 " 21>2.9 678.1 1.1 278.5 716.2 ., ' •5.7 116,) I .7 830, 1 100,6 S9.1 10,2 26,4 '° 1 63.1 163.5 " "'0 I 736.8 78 7 t5,9 4l. I '" 11.l 32.8 1.0 151.S •09.0 1•.5 16.8 '-3,6 ' 103.B 716.} Ml •oo 1H NORTH CAROLINA 241
I
I
I
I I 1-
I I
I i
I
I •
I
I REFERENCE 8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I ·-I
D '
E
is=·--,.--,,,.., ·uon er w·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
Reprint from North Carolina Administrative Code: 15 NCAC 28 .0308 Current through:'' June 30, 1989
1
I
q
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/\'I/CD -Ei\'V/RO;\',\IENTAI. MA,\'AGE\!ENT T/5: 028 .0300
SECTIO'i .0300 -ASSIG'.\\IE:'\T or STREA:'11 CLASSfflCATIOi\S
.0301 CLASSIFICATIO:\S: GE:\ER,\L (a) Schedule of Classifications. The classifications assigned to the waters •of the State of Nonh Carolina are set fonh in the schedules of classifications and water quality standards assigned to the waters of the river basins of Nonh Carolina, 15 NCAC 2B .0302 to .0317 which are on file in the Office of the Allomcy General of ?\onh Carolina. These classifications are based upon the existing or con-templated best usage of the various streams and segments of streams in the I basin, as dctennincd through studies and evaluations and the holding of public hearings for consideration of the classifica-tions proposed.
I (b) Stream :'-./amcs. The names of the streams listed in the schedules of assigned classifications were taken as far as possible from United States Geological Survey topographic maps. Where topographic ···maps were unavailable, U.S. Corps of Engineers maps, U.S. Ocpanment of Agri~ulture soil maps, and Nor1h Carolina highway maps were used for the selection of stream names. (c) Classifications. The classifications assigned to the waters of North Carolin.a are denoted by the lc1tcrs \VS-I, \VS-II. \VS-Ill, Il, C, S,\, Sil, and SC in the column headed "class.'1 A brief explanation of the "best usage'' for which the waters in each class must be protected is given 3s follows:
fresh Waters
Class \VS-I:
Class WS-11:
Class \VS-Ill:
Class ll:
Class C:
Tidal Salt Waters
Class Si\:
Class Sll:
Class SC:
waters protCctcd as water supplies ,vhich are in natural and uninhabitCd or predominantly undeveloped (not urbanized) watersheds; no point source discharges are permitted and local land management program·,s to control nonpoint source pollution are required; suitable for all Class C uses; waters protected as water supplies which are in low to moderately developed (urbanized) water.sheds; discharges are restricted to primarily domestic wastcwaters or industrial non-process waters specifically apprOvcd by the commi:-s,on: local land management programs to control non1point source pollution arc required; suitable for all Class C uses; ' water supply segment \\·ith no categorical restrictions on watershed dc1·elopmen1 or discharges; suitable for all Class C uses; , primary recreation and any other usage specified by the "C" classification; fish and ,rildlifc propagation, secondary recreation, agriculture/ and other uses requiring waters of lower quality. 1
shdlfishing for market purposes and any other usage specified by the "SB" and '·SC" cb.ssification;
I primary recreation and any other usage specified by the "SC" classification; fish and wilJlifc propagation, secondaI)' recreation, and other u~cs requiring \\'alcrs of lo\\'cr quality. '
Supplemental Classifications
Trout Waters:
Swamp Waters:
\S\V:
ORIV:
Suitable for natural trout propagation and maintenance of slacked trout; \\'aters which ha,·e low velocities and other natural charactcristiCs which are <lilTcrcnt from adjacent streams; · ;\utricnt scnsiti\·c waters which require ljmitations on nutrient inputs; outstanJing resource waters which arc unique and special watcrs1of exceptional st:1tc or national ·recreational or ecological significance which require :--pccial protection to maintain existing uses. 1 (d) \Vatcr Quality Stambrds. The \~·aicr quality standard:,; applicable to each classification assigned arc those cstablishc<l in 15 \C.\C 2B .021111, Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable to the Surface \\'J.tcrs of :<orth Carollna, {lS .:uloptcd by the ~<orth Carolina Em·iron;ncntal .\tanagc-mcnt Commission.
(c) lnJe, \umhcr
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\ 1\'RCD -ENVIRO,V.lff.I\',. _j__ MANAGEMENT TIS: 02B .0300
I (I) Reading the Index Number. The index number appearing in the column so designated is an identification number assigned to each stream or segment of a stre~m, indicating the specific tributary progression between the main stem stream and the tributary
1 stream. (2) Cross-Referencing the Index Number. 1l1e inclusion of the index number in the schedule is to provide an adequate cross reference between the classification schedules and an alphabetic list of streams.
(f) Classification Date. The classification date indicates the date on whic~ enforcement of the pro-visions of Section 143-215. I of the General Statutes of North Carolina became effective with reference to the classification assigned to the various streams in North Carolina. · (g) Reference. Copies of the schedules of classifications adopted and assigned to the waters of the various river basins may be obtained at no charge by writing to:
· Director
Division of Environmental Management
Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development
Post Office Box 27687 ·
Raleigh, ,\onh Carolina 2761 I (h) Places where the schedules may be inspected:
Division of State Library
Archives --State Library Building
I 09 E. Jones Street
Raleigh, ,\onh Carolina. (i) Unnamed Streams. , (!) Any stream which is not named in the schedule of stream classifications carries the same classi-fication as that assigned to the stream segment to which it is tributary except: (A) unnamed streams speci/icaLiy described in the schedule of classifications; or (fl) unnamed freshwaters tributary to tidal saltwaters will be classified "C','; or (C) after ,\orembcr I, 1986, any newly created areas of tidal saltwater which arc connected to Class SA waters by approved dredging projects will be classified "SC" 'unless case-by-case re-classification proceedings are conducted. 1
(2) The following river basins have different policies for unnamed streams entering other states or for specific areas of the basin: · 1
Hiwassce River Ilasin (Rule .0302)
Little Tennessee Rh·cr Basin and Savannah River Drainage Arca (Ruic .0303)
French Broad Ri,·cr Ilasin (Ruic .0304) Watauga River Ilasin (Ruic .0305)
Broad River Basin (Ruic .0306)
:---ew River Basin (Rule .0307)
Catawba River Basin (Rule .0308)
Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin (Rule .0309) Lumber River Ilasin (Rule .0310)
Roanoke River Basin (Ruic .0313)
Tar-Pamlico Ri,-cr Basin (Rule .0316)
Pasquotank River Basin (R ulc .03 I 7)
His1ory Nole: S1a1u1ory Au1hori1y G.S. /43-2/4.I; /43-2/5./; /43-2!5.J{a)(I),, Ejf February I, 1976; . Amended Lff Norember /, /986; Febn1ary I, /986; January I, /985; Sep1ember 9, /979. · '
NOR TH CA 1/OLI.\A A D.\l/SISTR.-1 TI1'E CODE 02/22/89 ii
I 1/RCD -DlVIRONIIENTAL l!ANAG!Y ) 2B .OJOO
I .0308 CATAWBA RIVER BASIN
Classification fl NarrE: of Stream Description Class Date Index }fo. I Unnan-ed Trihutacy at Fran source to Catawba Creek C 9/1/74 11-130-3 Orthopedic Hospi ta1
I Shoal Branch Fran source to Catawba Creek C 9/1/74 11-130-4 llill Creek Fran source to North Carolina-South C 9/1/74 11-131 Carolina State Line
I Long Cove Fran source to Lake Wylie, Catawba WS-III&B 2/1/86 11-132 River
Porter Branch Fran source to Lake Wylie, Cata\roa C 9/1/74 11-133 River I Stuamail Branch Fran source to Lake "7lie, Catawba C 9/1/74 11-134 River
~ Crowders Cieek · Frcxn source to North Carolina-South C 9/1/74 11-135 I Carolina State Line Squirrel Branch Frcrn source to Crowders Creek C 9/1/74 11-135-1 Mci,ill Creek Fran source to Crowders Creek C 9/1/74 11-135-2 I Unnamed Tributary at Fran source to Dam at Camp James Lake B 3/1/62 11-135-3-(1) Camp James ( Camp
James Lake)
Unnamed Tributary at Frcxn Dam·at Camp James Lake to C 9/1/74 11-135-3-(2) I Camp JaJnes Crowders Creek
Abernethy Creek Frcxn source to Crc:,o,,ders Creek C I 9/1/74 11-135-4 First Creek Proo source to Abernethy Creek C 9/1/74 11-135-4-1 I Bessemer Branch From source to Crowders Creek C 9/1/74 11-135-5
•••••
Oats Creek Fran source to Abernethy Creek C 9/1/74 11-135-5-1 Oakland Lake Entire lake and connecting st.re.am to C 9/1/74 11-135-6 I Crowders Creek -...;;,,. Blackvood Creek Fran source to Crowders Creek C 9/1/74 11-135-7 Ferguson Branch Fran source to Cn:Mlers Creek C 9/1/74 11-135-8 McGill Branch Fran source to Crowd.ers Creek C 9/1/74 11-135-9 I South Fork Crowders Creek North Carolina Portion C , 3/1/62 11-135-10 South Crowders Creek Fran source to South Fork CrCYw"de.rs C 1 3/1/62 11-135-10-1 Creek
I Unnamed Tributary at Fran source to Dam at Sparrow Springs B : 3/1/62 11-135-10-1-1-(1) Sparr.ow Springs Lake Lake
(Spar= Springs Lake)
' Unnamed Tributacy at Fran Dam at Sparrow Springs Lake to C ',3/1/62 11-135-10-1-1-(2) I Sparrow Springs Lake South Fork Crowders Creek Rocky Branch Fran source to North Carolina-South C ,9/1/74 11-135-11 Caroli.na State Line I Torrence branch Fran source to North Carolina-South B 3/1/77 11-136 Carolina State Line
' Sugar Creek Frooi source to North Carolina-South C 9/1/71 11-137 I Carolina State Line Irvin Creek Frcxn source to Sugar Creek C 9/1/74 11-137-1 Oillons lvins Lakes Entire lakes and connecting streams C 9/1/74 11-137-1-1 and Lake Jo to Irwin Crwk. I Stewart Creek From source to Irwin Creek C 9/1/74 11-137-1-2 Taggart Cre<ek (Taggard Fran source to Sugar Creek C 9/1/74 11-137-2 • I 22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
~
u
H
D
u
E
I
I .
I
REFERENCE 9 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
February 18, 1991
To: Davis Park Road TCE Site File
From: Bruce Nicholson
Subj: Telecon with CHris Goodreau, NC Wildlife Resources Fisheries
Biologist, [phone].
I spoke with Mr. Goodreau concerning the use of Blackwood and
Crowders Creek as fisheries. He said he thought 'he had no data on
these creeks, he would check on that and get back 1to me if he found
any. Just based on what he knows about Crowders Creek he would say
that there is virtually no use of Crowders Cree~ in the Gastonia
area and only very limited use, perhaps a little bridge fishing by
locals, several miles downstream. '
I bin/tel/davis2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
)
REFERENCE 101
I
'
I ·
i '
'
I
I
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NORTH CAROLINA
I
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT
GEORGE R. ROSS, DIRECTOR
DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES
JASPER L. STUCKEY, STATE GEOLOGIST
BULLETIN NUMBER 63
GEOLOGY AND GROUND: WATER
IN THE
I
Charlotte Area, North Ca'rolina
BY
H. E. LEGRAND AND M. J. MUNDORFF
GEOLOGISTS, U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
•
I
I PREPARED COOPERATIVELY BY THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY,
' UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
•
1952
I
I GlcOLOGY AND G!WUND WATER IN TIIE CIIAltLOTTE .-\REA, NO!tTII CAitOLINA 47
I GASTON COUNTY
(Arca, ;J:,S square miles; population in 1950. 110,S3G)
f~eogrnphy a11tl physiographr.-Gaston County lies in the south-central part of the Charlotte area.
ll;astonia, with a population of 23,003, is the largest municipality and the cou11ty seal. Textile manufac-
■uring is the largest industry in the county although there is consiclcrahlc farming activity. The county iS
well served by railroads and paved roads.
I Gaston County is a rolling upland portion of the Piedmont pro\"incc, the ge,nera.l altitude being slight-
y more than 800 feel. Some of the streams have incised their \'alleys as much as 200 feet below the up-
1"-nd, and as a result the topography near the streams is quite hilly. Rising several hundred feet above the
'
eneral level of the country are several pronounced northeast trending ridges,· all of which are composed
r resistant quartzite. Prmninent among these are Kings l\1ountain Pinnacle: Crowders l\1ountain, and
pencer Mountain.
l The county is drained by Catawba River, which flows south along the east boundary. The main tribu-
aries of the Catawba flow southeastward across the general trend of the rock~ and for the most part are
ot noticeably influenced by any differential resistance of rocks to erosion. The tributaries are closely
spaced, resulting in a fine-textured drainage pattern and the absence of extensive, flat interstream areas.
llvith the exception of South Fork Catawba River, the streams haYe fairly shor~ steep courses, and conse-
lliuently are rather swift. 1
Geology.-Numerous types of rocks occur in Gaston County (fig. 13). and their relations one with an-
l ther are complex. The general northeast schistose structure prevails so that rocks of eastern Cleveland
ounty extend northeastward into the western part of Gaston.
Mica schist forms the dominant host rock into which the granite was injected in Gaston County. Nat-·
•
rally enough, the granite did not intrude the schist evenly and in a few areas g~anite is either scant or ab-
ent in the schist. The belt of schist 2 miles east of Gastonia and parts of the schist near Kings Mountain
Pinnacle and Crowders Mountain contain very little granite. Muscovite or sericite, and quartz are generally
lhe chief components of the schist although manganese and chlorite are not uncommon.
Composite rocks in which mica schist and granite are interlayered, gener~,IIY in northeast trending
belts, are widespread in the western two-thirds of the county. The largest belt in which the schist is pre-
fominant surrounds Kings Mountain Pinnacle and extends through the westerrt side of Bessemer City to
igh Shoals in the northern part of the county. The schist is subordinate in qua:ntity to the granite in the
rea between Dall,rs and Stanley and along the Cleveland Countv line southeast 6f Cherryville.
Several masses or belts of homogeneous or nearly homogeneous granite occut in Gaston County. The
largest of these extends northward from the basin of South Crowders Creek at the South Carolina line,
lhrough Gastonia to Lincoln County east of High Shoals. One finger of this ma:.ss extends southwestward
to Bessemer City where it is the type locality for Keith's Bessemer granite." Another large mass of gran-
ite occurs southeast of Cherryville. .
The granites are not uniform in appearance and mineral constituents. The
1
granite at Bessemer City
is locally more gneissic and contains more biotite than most of the granite in the county. The granites for
lhe most part have a light color and medium texture, although small bodies within the complex proper are
oarse textured and may be called pegmatite. ,
Gneisses and schists, containing hornblende as a prominent dark mineral, are common in Gaston Coun-
_
y. In addition to the numerous lenses of hornblendic rocks interlayered with other country rocks, several
arge areas of hornblende gneiss occur. One of these, in the vicinit,· of Beaverdaril Creek in the northwest-
rn part of the county, has been studied in some detail.'• Soils derh;ed from the h,ornblende gneiss are gen-
erally dark brown or red in color and are more fertile than those from other rocks.
I A composite rock in which diorite and granite appear as intermixed bodies occurs in a general north-
outh belt along the eastern boi'der of the county. This belt extends eastward into Mecklenburg County
I
I ::.sKeith, Arthur, op. cit., p. 4.
:,,Kesler. T. L., Correlation of some metamorphic rocks in the central Carolina Piedmont:
. 773. 1944. .
Geol. Soc. of America Bull.. vol. 55,
I
I r.
·I f
,
! ,,
•
---
Figure 13
-
m
~
D
□
~
l:SEl
Qj:!J -~
--
EXPLANATION
Mka, schbl
Mica s<;hi$\ and granite
,ehisl predominant
Granite and mica uhisl
gr1nil• prtdomlnant
Granite
Diorite and g111riite
d,orite p1tdomin1n\
Granite and diorile
gnn,to predominant
Hornblende gneiu and granite
iMtrlain
Gabbro-diorite
and 1n.ed bUi( rO<:h
Quartzite
Limestone
,.,,,1ngomtnl ol units, one 1t>ovt Jht olhel, don not
in<l,catt chrcnolo(ic111e<1ut,..ct. AU 11n,u art P1leoloic
•a• or oldtr. Gtolog,c t,oundar,o "" 1pp,o,im11e.
--
sou
-
GEOLOGIC MAP
OF --
GASTON COUNTY
Mlt(S
0
FIGURE 13.-GEOLOG!C MAP OF GASTON COUNTY.
-
GeGloty by H. (. leGranc! and 1A. J. Mun~orrr.
0 er, 0 s Cl
"'
0
3
C z
z
C")
>
C [ z >-
I
I GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROL!~..\ 4!)
where it is of greater prominence. The rocks of the complex are not well expOsed, and as a consequence
'
heir relation with adjacent rocks to the west is not certain. In this connection;. a zone ot dioi·ile and diorile
,neiss extending northeastward through Lowell is adjacent to the complex and ma,· be genetically related
o it. South of Mt. Holly the amount of granite appears to be subordinate to diorite· but northward the dio-
rite is subordinate in amount. Pronounced granular disintegration is characteristic of both components of
l he complex in the Charlotte area. '
Several northeast-t~ending belts of quartzite occur in the central part of Gaston County. The ridges
that they form by their resistance to erosion serve to show the broad structural· trends of the rocks. In the
l rea south of Crowders Mountain, Keith" has noted three divisions of the quartzite, namely kyanite quartz-
te, white, nearly pure quartzite, chloritic quartzite, and seritic quartzite. The beds of quartzite are con-
sidered to be of the same general age, but the relation of one with another is nrit clear.
I Ground ,rater.-Most of the domestic water supplies, many of the indust~ial supplies, and two of the
nunicipal supplies in Gaston County are obtained from wells (fig. 14). Most! of the ,rnter in rural sec-
tions comes from dug wells that derive water from the weathered and disinteirated zone between the soil
I nd the underlying unweathered rock. Where the unweathered rock lies neari the suriace difficulty may
rise in digging a well deep enough to obtain a dependable well. The failure of dug wells is not confined
to any one rock type although attempts to dig wells on upland areas underlail1 by quartzite are likely to
a'e unsuccessful. ·
I Records of more than 200 drilled wells are included in the table of well data. The records of 151 wells
were complete enough for use in compiling table 11 below.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T.-\IlLE 11.-SU)DIARY OF D . .\T.\ ox ,VELt.S IX G,\STON cOuNTY
(Drilled wells 3 inches or more in diameter)
ACCORDING TO ROCK TYPE
Yield (gaUona 1, minute)
Avtra1tt
Trn: or Roci: ~umlx-r of depth ' .,u.
I ([~l) ... , .. Average Per root
of well
I l Sehlllt_ _ ......... __ .......... : .. _ .. 73 I 180 0-150 23 '13
Granite ................... __ ....... " i 165 0-100 I 18 , II -'
AU wells. ___ ..••• ___ .••. _ .•.•. ___ 151 I 172 o·-1so I 21 .12
I I
ACCORDING TO TOPOGRAPHIC LOCATION
I
I P~rttnl o[ .,ell,
yitldi11J.'. I ul:,Ju
a miou1e or
1~ .
'
' ,
'
' '
Number of
"'"'
A,·erage
deplb
([ttt)
Yield (gallons a minute) I Pcrl.'t'nt of •till
f---~---------j yitldin,: I pUon
TOPOOIUJ'RIC LO('.ATION
Range
Hill .............................. . 43 153 0-'5
tbt_ ............................. . 143 . s-'40
Slope ............................. . H 191 1-IW
Draw .......•..•......•............ 53 179 2-102
Valley ...... _ .•.. _ ...•.... _. ___ .. __ HJ 0-25
i II ' i 18
I 25
26
15
Per foot
of well
.07
'13
. IJ
.H
'10
I a ruinute o~
I=.
I ~Kelth, Arthur. op. cit., (folio 222) p. 5.
I
--,-------
<;-\
")_' y~
'V-i.\ '9-!>o!i o,
\"
MAP OF
GASTON COUNTY
SHOWING LOCATION OF WELLS
-
" 5◄ ' " '-..__'
---liiiil --LN -------
n g, .. /
~I
r .2 10
I
r
I
SCALE
MILES
0 •
FIGURE 14,-MAP OF GASTON COUNTY SHOWING LOCATION OF WELLS
--
"" 0 g
"" ► z
0
0 s
C z tJ
z
0 ·► s [: z ►
·tt41 ------------~-------
I
I GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NOllTH CAROLINA 51
Although the wells in table 11 were drilled in schist and granite, some o[ the wells probably penetrat-
l d other types of rocks also. As the spacing between the different rocks can be measured in terms of feet
nd inches it is inevitable that many wells pass through rocks other than that indicated at the top o[ the
well. The .schist is composed of muscovite and quartz in 1nost places, but it ;1nay contain beds of horn-
,-'lende gneiss and schist, pegmatites, and other rocks. ·
I . Table 11 indicates that the average depth of wells in schist is 1S0 feet a11d that the average yield is
23 gallons a minute; this compares with an average depth of 165 feet in granite and an average yield of
-
8 gallo. ns a minute. If average yield per foot of well is considered, .the water1.-yielding characteristics o[
he schist is only slightly greater than that of granite. The average yield of wells in both schist and
ranite is 21 gallons a minute, which is 4 gallons a minute higher than the average for all wells in the
Charlotte area. It is not certain that the higher yield of wells in Gaston County is significant because
'he same general geology and topography occur also in Lincoln and Clevelani Counties.
The part of table 11 showing the relation of average yield and average yield per foot of well to the
ttopography is significant. Wells located on hills have by far the smallest avetage yield and average yield
er foot of well. In addition 7 percent of the wells on hills in the county yield 1 gallon a minute or less. As
s the case in the Charlotte area as a whole, the wells on hills yield only about half as much water per foot
of well as wells in draws.
1
l Analyses of samples of water from nine wells and one spring in Gaston 6ounty are given in a table
ollowing the well records. All but well 97 penetrated schist or granite or both schist and granite. Well
97 penetrated both granite and diorite. The water ranged in hardness from 26 to 158 parts per million.
lirhe iron content ranged from 0.08 to 8.6 parts per million. Water from diffeient wells in the towns of
ilcherryville and Stanley showed a considerable local variation in content of iton.
Analysis of water from one spring is sho;vn in the table. This water contii.ined only 59 parts per mil-·
Ilion of dissolved solids, despite the fact that it flows from hornblende gneiss! one of the most readily
soluble rocks of the Charlotte area. The low mineral content of this spring water is thought to be typical
inasmuch as water from springs normally flows through the rocks more rapidly than water from wells.
I Temperatures of waters ranged from 60' to 66' F. and averaged 62' F. The water having a tempera-
ture of 66' F. is pumped from a well 1,053 feet deep. ,
I There are two municipally owned ground-water supplies in Gaston County; in addition the town of
McAdenville is supplied with water from a well owned and operated by a mill.i
Cherryville, ptlpulation 3,486, obtains its water from eight wells in various parts of the town. All the
I wells penetrate granite. The wells range from 132 to 238 feet in depth and f}om 10 to 75 gallons a min-
ute in yield. Six of the wells yield approximately 20 gallons a minute each. The chemical quality of the
water is good. The total dissolved solids of the water from any of the wells I does not exceed 115 parts
per million. The water receives no regular treatment.
I Stanley, population 1,645, obtains its supply from four wells. Three of the wells are at least 350 feet
deep. They vary in yield from 15 to 45 gallons a minute. The water from th~ four wells contains more
I than the average amount of mineral matter for ·all wells in the county and i.s slightly hard; the water
from well 10 contained 4.9 parts per million of iron on November 20, 1947. The water is not treated.
McAdenville, population 1,059, is supplied with water from a well owned\ by Stowe Mills, Inc. The
I well, 132, is 523 feet deep and yields in excess of 100 gallons a minute. A field1 test showed the water had
a total hardness of 230 parts per million. The water is not treated.
I
I
I
j
I
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA
RECOIUI:', OF \\IEl,LS IX GASTON COUKT\"
"'· r. ~"'" ~1---□-•_"_~_• ___ , ___ ; ____ 1----+---l----l--'--1--'---'----l~---
1
-
1
'-·"_•_•_•_• __ _
Tot...l hanl-
l)eplh DLlln1et" lkpih of Water kvel na:i (fi~ld
Trpe or or wcU ofwdl c:a..,ing (fo:-tl Uflow Yidd tnta) .,u {{ttl) (inches) (fttt) surfac,i:) (g.p.m.) (11.p.m.) '
I
I
I
I
I
I
, milo NE. ol Moo,t lloUy .... 1 D,k, Pm, C. ....... II.Lum ......... c~o,
••. . do •.•••••••..... ___ ...••.•••.. do ..•......... __ •• ___ .do .....•. __ •...• Cr-Dr
..•. do •.......•....•....•••...••.. Jo ..••..•...••••.•..•. do .•..•••....... C'r-Drl
Lucia, 6 mile! N. of Mouut
Holly--------------····----.\Ir$. W. T. Bntty .... Julius Hager........ Cr-Dr
.••• do •..•••.•••••••....•••.•• J. A. Mdn1osh .•..•••• -------···········--Dug
.••• do •••••.......••••••••.•.• \\', C. ~lclotosh ...•... ------·············· Dug
St•nlcy ....••••••........•. --G. K. Derr .•.•••••.••.......••.••..••.... Cr-Dr
8 .••• do ••••• ••·········-······· H. C. Mun11:o •..••..•• ···················-Cr-Dr
..•• do........................ To,rn .. _. .......••.•• \'a. Mach. Co....... Dr
10 .••• do ...•.•..•••••......... •-.. __ do .......••••......... do .••.•••..• _ ... Dr
II ..•• do ....•...•.•••• ·-········ •••. do .•............••..•. do ....•••.••••• _ Dr
Ila •••• do .......•••••••••••.•..••••.• do .•••..•....•..••..•...•.•.•••.•••••• Dr
12 •••• do •••••••••••••••..•....•. Lola Milb, Inc ..••••••.••••••••.•••••••••• Dr
13 •••• do ••..•••••••••••••.•.•••••••• do ......•••.••••••..•...•••••••••••..• Dr
U Aielia. 3 milca NW oL .••....•• B. D. Bradshaw~ ••••••••••••..•..••••••••• Dr
15 2milcsSE.ofHighShoala ....•• HardioMfg.Co ..•....•••••••.•...•••••••• Dr
I" 17 •••• do ••••••••••••••...••••..••..• do ..•.•.•••••••••• R. E. Faw •••••••... Dr
Hi&:hSboab •••••.••....•.•••• CarolioiaoMiU •••••••••.••••••••••••••••.• Dr
18 •••. do ••••••.•••....•..•••••••.••• do .......••••••..•..••••••••••••••....•••••.•. I HI 2milelW.ofHia;bShoab ..•••• P.A.KiKr •••...••••• Va..M~b.Co .••••.• Due-Dr
20 2¼milesW.ofHighShoal., .•.. Mr,.M.A.Carpeottr .••.•• do ••••••••.•..•• Dr
21 4 milca W. of High Shoals . ..:.,,.·· A. M. Kiser ••••.••••• Robbios ....•.•••••• Dr
22 .••• do .••••••••••.•.•.•...•••• D. C. KiS<-r-••..••...••••• do .•....•....••• Dr I,,
" " 126
27
,t_½ mi!N W. of High Shoals.... Forrest Dalliogcr ••••••..•. do.............. Dr
6milesW.ofHia;hShoal., •••••. W.E.IGM,r .•••••••..•••• do .•••.•..••..•. Dr
,t miles SW. of Hia;h Shoala..... A. L B.arbc-c.......... Robbins............ Dr
6m~E.ofChcrr)'Tilk .•..••• F.F.Allen .•....••••••... do •••••••.•••••. Dr
4½milcsE.ofChclT}'Tille ••... G.A.JkU .••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••• Dur:
28 .••• do •.•••••••••••••..••...•• G. W. Be.am ••..••...•
B. R. Beam ••••••••...
S. C. C..rpentcr ••.....
Robbini .•..•.•••••• c~o.
D,
~D, " I JO
JI
"
133
" " 36
3½ milee E. of Cherryville •••..
of miles E. of Cheuyville. _ ••.••
HiclOfy Pump Co ...
Coffcef •••••••••••••
•••. do ••••••...............••. B. H. Caq1eoter ..•••.. Costou A: Daffl •... 0---Dr
3 mi lee E. of Cherryville....... Mr,. Verna Pareour ... • . . .....•••..... •••• Cr-Dr
..•. do •••••.•.•...........•••• C. G. Bum ........••• Hickory Pump Co .•• Dr
..•• do .•••••••••••••••••••....•••• do ..•• ·-···-······ ••.. do ...........••. Dr
I½ milts NE. of Churyville ••••.•.. do.·-············· •••. do ....•••.•••••. Dr
Cherryville •.•.....•...•...••• Carlton Mills ......... Robbina ••..••••••.. Dr
37 ..•• do ....•......•........••• -.... do •.......••..•.•.... do .•..........•• Dr
..•. do........................ Carolina Freight
I II " II Carricra ...•........ Hickory Pump Co .. _ Dr
39 •••• do •.•.•••.••....•..••.. -.. Rbrue-lbuxr Co ... __ ..•• do ..•.....•••••• Dr
~0 •••• do ............•............••• do ........•....... ············-·--···· Dr
~\ •••• do •.....•.•••.....••••••..••.. do ................ ··············-····· Dr
U;½
219
JO,
J6
23
J1
98
IJ0
J,O
,00
350
,oo
70
" 80
'"
"'
'"
100
160 ,o,
78
105½
"' 128
HJ ,.
80
121
"
127
100±
'" 100 ..,
97
118
300
170
190!
200±
" 18
' '
8
' '
8&6
8
;s+ ......... .
"
60
"
IS
"
30
"
"
,0
8-10
"
"
"
8-9
' '·
I JO'
"
4 •••••••.....•...•• 20·-I.S !
6 120± c.6 H;
6 60 10-15;
5 5/8 •••···•• •·••··•••· ·······'·
5 5/fi 73 30--40 !
I
,0
60
JO
"
"
,0
35
110
"
,0
(0
, ,;8 ........ .......... , I •.....•.....
5 5/8 ·••·•··· ···-······ 4-.5 30 5 5/8 •••.••.. ........•• IO 50
55/8 •••••••••••••••••.••....• 1 ..••••••••••
48 74 "'~ I quate 20 ..
" 30
I I .........••.
100 7
'
5 5/8 ........ ····•···•·
6 •••••••• ••·••••••·
5 5/8 •••••••• ·······-·· 25-30
5 5/8 ..•..... ·······-·· 75-30
6
8 " " 20
"
,0
5-0
(0
" "
"
35
" " ····-·······
Granite. Well at water tank.
fuL
Granik. \\'ell at eommissary .
Slope.
Not used •
Supplies water lo 11:hool, farm
and home. Grauite. Draw.
G!'111ite. Slope .
Granite. Good yidJ rer,ortc-d.
Hill
G1'111ite. Hill
G!'111ite. At one time supplied
13 (•milicaand aeveral1tnr~
Draw.
62° F. Granite. .-1.oalrsis .
Well is at U.ok-. Hill
62}-i° F. Granite. An•lyW.
WeU ii; one•fourtb mile north
oftank:. Hill.
62½° F. Granite. An:i.lr1i1.
Well ill SW. of town. llilL
G(Uite. Pump 1ettioa: at Ila
feet; drawdowo n.piJ but
held at 20 r;.p.m. at 150 foot
actling. Slope.
Granite. Well •l rc,rn·oir.
Hill
Dye houae well Hill.
Schirt. Formerlyu3t<fbyuw.
mill; b.rie yidJ rrr,ortc-d.
Slop<.
Granite. U..-i 5 b.p. pump.
Valley.
Gt&Oite. U1e 5 b.p. pump.
dnw.
Schilt. Uae 10 b.p. pump. s~.,._
Granite. Valley.
Due 61 rt.. drilled 99..
Hill
Schut. Good yield reported.
Slop<.
60° F. Schill Could oot
lower -nttt kvel with
bailer. Flat.
Schill. Hill.
Hill
Slop<.
Hill.
Slope.
Hill
Watu rep«t.ed 10ft. with oo
iron. Hill.
Watu repoc-tc-d 10ft. Slope .
Slope.
Hill
Hill
Wellaupplicaai1 ho~. Slope.
Well by ·..-uh ho\131'. Draw.
61½° F. Well •t west end of
-n11U boo,e. Draw.
Draw.
61¼° F. Draw.
63¼° F. Draw.
62¼° F. Draw.
I
I GEOLOGY AND GROUND \VATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA 53
-.. 11
""·
14' .,.
" H I" "
I" " " 50
I SI
" "
I St
" ,.
"
I "
" 60
51
I " " "
" I " "
I "
" ;o
;1
" I ;J
H
I "
"
J.()("ATIOS DRILi.ER
Chmyvillc ................... Dora Yarn ~tilb .•.... Ralph Robhins .....• Dr
• •.. do .. __ .•••....•• ___ .••. ___ • ___ do •••• _ .•••••...••.••••••• ___ . ___ •• __ _ Dr
..•• do ••.•••...•.•....••...••. Town ...•••••..•••.•. Ltt ...•.•.••....••• Dr
.... do ........................ ____ do................ ....... .......... ... Or
.... Jo ............................ do.......................... Dr
_ •.. do ... ___ .... _ .•............ __ .do ..• _._.......... 1-.....
..•• do .•.••...••.•...••....•••..•• do ..••••••...••....•••......••....•.••....••..
•••. do .....•••....•....•••••..•••• do................ Robbins .......••...
.••• do ••••..•.••......•...•••...•. do ...••••...•••.•.•••••.....•••...•••• Dr
..•• do .•.•••...••••...••....••...• do •.....•••...•.••....•.••....•••...•• Dr
····::······ .................. ····::········· ······· ....... ········· ····1 ::
. .. . do ...•••.....•....••....••.... do .••...••...••.•• 1 ..•••.•...•.•...... • I Dr
I ' D,
: :::£::::::::: ::: : ::: :: ::~::: ~~~:~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~-:~:, :~~~~!:~::~~i~~:::: :I g;
...• do........................ Rhyne-Hauser Ml,:. I
Co. ..•••••.•.••...•..•• do .••••....••... Dr
:: ::;;::::: ::: ::: ::::: :::::::: . ''.~;;'._~'.·:.~·::::: :: .~;;;;::::::::::::I ;;
•••• do •..•••....•••...••••••••.•.. do ••••••••••••...•.... do •••••....••... Dr
~}i mikt SE. or Cherryville ••.. Tryon School •.••••...•••• do .••.•••.•••••• Dr
•••• do •••••.••••..•••••••••••• Fred Bigrcntalf .••••••...• do •••...•••••.•• Dr
••.• do........................ Andcnon Haen-•••••..•••• do.............. Dr
3½miksNW.of8esscmcrCity D.LKiser .••••••......•• do .•••.•...•••.. Dr
3 mika NW. of Ikssemer City. C. C. H&tttlacm •.••.••.... do ••••..•.•••..• Dr
2½ milea NW. of Ikssemer City. R. V. Guitoo ••••••••• llicl,;o.-r Pump Co... Dr
I¼ mil~ W. of Dalla.s .•••••.•• R. E.Summey ••••..•• Robbins ......•••... Dr
2milctSW.ofDalla.s •••• ,:.r--'·· E. D. Puour ••••••••••••• do ..•.••••••.••• Dr
I¼ mile, W. of Oalla.s .••••.••• County Home ••••••••..•...••••••..•••... Dr
I mileSW.orDallu ••••..•••.. C.S. Vmcent ••.•••••• Robbins ....••••..•• Cr-Dr
D11b.a •••••.••••••••••••.•••• Morowcb Cottoo Mills
Co •••••••.••.•••••••.•••.....•••...•••• Dr
Half-mile W. of Spencer
Mountain ...••••....••..••• Sam Love ••••......•• Ra.lpb Robbin~ ••••.• Dr
Speoeer Mountaio ••...•••.••.• Spencer Mouot.ain
Mill ..•••••...••••• R.E.faw ....•••... Dr
I¼ mile NW. of ~lount Holly •• Globe Mills., Inc....... ••••........•••••.•• Dr
ii .... do ..••••......•••...••••..•••• do .•••••••..•••.••..•.••••......••.... Dr
I
I
I
g
;s t mile NW. or Mount Holly.... Kendriclt Bric It &
Tile Co .•.••.....•••....•••••.••....••.. Dr
i9 .... do •......•••....•.••..•••...•. do •••...•••••.•.••....•.•••••••..••••• Cr-Dr
SO I mile N. or Mouot Holly...... American Yaro, Inc
62
83
"
Nim, Plant ••.••..•• J.'S, Hinson •...••.. Dr
3 mil~ N. of Mouot Holly..... Duke Power Co.
2H mile:i N. of Mount Holly ..•
Mount Holly ....••....••.....
2 milea S. of Mount Holly ..••..
Mount.ain bland
Dam •••.••...••........••.•....•..•••.. Cr-Dr
Duke Power Co.
Supply Yard ••••...• H. L. Later .....••.. 0--Dr
Duke Power Co ....••.......••....•.••....•...••..
Sur,eriOI" Y&n1 Millil
Tucb.acge-t Plant. ... R. E. Faw •.....•••. Dr
Deplh
or well
(fttl)
250
JOO
180
200
200±
238
182
Iii
150-200
150-200
132
l'3
150
210
li8½
150½
196½
l'5
139
90
90
125
11,
1'7
1'2
120
330
"
142
1'6
" "
"
130
60
18'
208
70±
300+
"
223
Di.iimdtt Dt11th of Wakr lew-1
o{ weU c:.,.:iing (foct ~lo,.-
(inehN) (fttl) 1urfa~)
5 5/8
8
5.S
0
5 5/8 ···•·•·• •••·•···••
• ;s
5 5/8 ···•••·· 100
5 5/8 •....•...•..•.....
55/8 ••.•.... 90
5 5/8 ····•·•· •••••..•••
5 5/8 •.•.••..
5 5/8 ••······ " 90
55/8 •...•••• -to
55/8 118 H
5 5/8 ...... -~~ ·••·•···••
5 5/8
5 5/8
11<1
118 '
5 5/8 ····~··· ••••••••••
5 5/8 •·••···· ···••••·••
5 5/8 ···••••• ••••··••••
5 5/8 ;5
5 5/8 90
5 5/8 5~ 29
Yi~ld
{g.p.m.)
I 10 ,o
'° 30
Tota.I lard-i
n"5 (fidd j
!t'llll)
(11.11.m.}
I
.•...••• ~ •.. \ Sot uxd; iosufficient )'idd.
•...••...••. , Df11.w •
~O On f.Mt Main Strttl. n&t . 60 'I 61° f. Draw •
25 ••..•••...•. 1 .H old Cherryvilie !-.!fp:. Co.
Slofl"'.
75 ··•••····••• All1lysis. Wdl 200 yd1. S. of I Che~yville Cott.on Mill. A.
I IW>,i. in u.We. On.w.
30 .............. Wlyais. Under water tank.
I I Hill . .•..• _ ••••••.•.••••... \ltoolboU5C. Upfl"'(i. 1h11.
20 ~0 · .\l the pump 1t.ation. Hill .
~ .....•.•..•. ! Attank;inyud. Hill .
20-25 •••....•••.. : .loalr,,i3. lkhind Cannerr.
I I Slope.
20-2_5 .....••••••. 1 .\t cannery. Slope.
20-25 ••••••..•••• ! .loaly,13. South of link, on
I I cannery lot. Draw.
25 ••....••••.. i Scar Nu.Way mills.
I~ fi5
1
1 Draw.
10-12 05 1 Draw.
11<1
10
" 18
' " 20
'
35
.,
Plant 2. Draw,
Pb.at 2, oot U9Cd: insufficient
,rat.er, Hill.
Comi:-,ny weU I, Hill.
Comi:-,Dy well 2. Hill.
Hill.
&hilt. Hill.
Schist. Df11.W.
Water reported to coatain iron.
&:hist.
5 5/8 ····•••• •••••··••• •••···••• •••••••.•••• Schlst. Laree yield, aoft water
aod no iron rcpoctc,d, Hill
&,ft water rcpOl"tcd. Schill.
• .,
5 5/8
"" •
•
5 5/8
"
120
102
20
101!,,i
H
20
47 .48
35
52½
18
'"
o'
• 18 I
15 ,
"
" " " 35
50
35
" " "
Slope.
WcU drilled on granite kd:,:e.
Gnnitc. Hill.
Graoitc. Good yield repoctcd.
I Slop<.
1.Grani~ .. :~~~~············
Granite. Slope.
Granite. Hill
J111t below t.op of ahatp hill.
Schist.
Quartxlte. Draw.
Uled by mill and village. Slope.
l?.ed by mill and -,,U\age. Hill.
••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 Diorite. Hill.
····· .. ··········
10' 61° F. Diorite. Slope.
0 , .••..••••••• We□ not used; no ,rater ob-
tained. Diorit.c. \'aUey.
2..J 60
"
" "
Graoitc. Suppliea 11 funiliea.
.Slope~
Granite. llilL
Supplies 3 boURII.
62° F. Schlstl Supplies ,ilJ.
1ge, Slope.
I
, I
•
I
GEOLOGY AND GROUND w ATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTII CAROLINA
HFCOl!l)S OF ,v~-LLt-; IX GASTO;'\ Col"'.\"TY-Continucd
Loc~TION 0WNUI D1111.u:R Tn-.e of
M. Wfi!
.-;;-Z mil.-:11 S, o[ Mount Holly ______ Superior Ya.rn Milb, ■ -Tuckue«tt Plant •.. C&rtn-.••••.•• C'r-Or
66 2!1 miles SW. of Mount Holly .. J. W. Byrd .•.••...... J. W. Robliina .. Cr-Dr
Si North llelmonL ...••..•••..... Acme Spinning Co ..•..•••............ D,
185 .... do ••...............••.......... do ••..••..•• _ ...... ----···---------·
89 .••. do ................................ do ................................ .
n,
D,
I
I
I
90 .••. do .•.••••.....•••..••..... Linfocd Mills, Inc ...... -----···············
91 .••. do ••.••.•......•.....•..•• Perfection Spinning
Co ...••••••..••.... ----······-·--·-·-··
92 •••. do .••.•...•••••••.••••.. __ F. E. Brad.thaw·-..... llark.nf'S!._._ ... _ ...
93 __ ._do_·······------··-···-··· Stowe Spinnin,: Co .•.•. Hid:Ofy Drilling
Co .... ·-······-··
D,
D,
Cr·Dr
D,
94 . ·-.do. ____ ._ ••••••• ·-·.··---.. __ .do .•• _ •• ··-._ .•• ·-RoLl.ina .. _ .. _...... Dr
95 _ ••. Jo ••• ·-·-·-·-·-···-······+-··do. __ ._._ .•••. -._-\\"i11t---······--··· I Dr
96 •••. J11 ••••. ·-·-----···-······-l_···do. ____ •••••• -•• --Wint(?) •••.•.... _.! Dr
I½ milct N. of Belmont........ Belmont Al,l:M-y ····-·-\'a. Mach. Co ....•.. \ Dr 97
198
" 100
1 mile NW. of Bdmoot ••• --•·· Sooth Fork Mf,:. Co._. Sydnor Wtll Co ...• · 1 Dr
lldw11nt •••... ---··-········· ClimuSpin11in1Co. __ . ···-···-···:··-···· I Cr-Dr
___ .dD·----······-············ Sterlinri Spinniog Co .•• Sydnor Well Co i Dr
I IOI
102
103
.••• do_······-·----···-······· Crei,.oent Spioning Co •. ······---··········· Cr-Dr
••• -do •••. ·-··············-··· •••• do•-·········---·· R. E. Faw.·-··:···· Dr
_._.d0 •. ---·······-·····-··-·· NatiOJJal Yarn Milb ••• ····-·-·-···--·····-Cr-Dr
110,
105
106
. _ •• do •••••••.• ·---···-······· __ •• do.-----········--··-·--·-············ Cr-Dr
___ .do·---······-···--········ .••• do •••••• ---··-····--······-----···-··· Cr-Dr
.-•• do •• ---·············-·--·· Imperial Yara Mills,
I
I
I
I
I
I
Inc •.• ·-·······-·-·-Kirlky •••...••. -•• Cr-Dr
l07 __ •• do •• ·-·······--··--······· __ •• do ••••• ---········ _ ••• do·---··--······ Cr-Dr
108 _ ••• do •••••• ---·-············· •••• do .• ---······-----------············--Dr
109 ..•• do·--·········-···--······ ._ •• do •••••• ---······· ······-·------······ Cr-Dr
I JO •••• do ••••• ----·--····-a,:..···· Mootbdl Ice A: Fuel
Co •••••••• ··----· ••. -· •• ·------·. --· •• • Dr
111 __ •• do·-·····-·-·-····-··-···· •••• do •• ----······-·-····--···········--·· Cr-Dr
112
113
IH
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
"'
125
126
127
I mile S. or BdmonL ... --····· Hcllf)' Lln,l:M-rgcr
P. W. Mu.a (fc11ant) Robbins •.••.•••.. -. Dr
l¼ milct S. of Belmo11t._ .••••• Mr. Mathcl"IOII._ ..•••• __ •• do •. ·-----······ Dr
l mile SW. of Btlmoot ••••. -·-· Miss flottnce Ake
R. L. Broob
(Teuant>.----······ •••. do. __ •••.••••.•.
◄ miles SE. of BelmooL._ ••• _ •• W. G. Drtnna.o •• •-··· ..• _d0 ••. ·-··---···-
-···do •••••• -.. ----·······-·-· J.M. Bowen
S. B. Benfield .• --·-· __ ._do----··--··---·
I¼' milt"S SW. of Bdmo11t •..... Eagle Yun Mills •••. --Wine(?) .•.........
IH miles S\\'. of Cramerton._ •• H. R. Lao, ••. ---·-··· BuITil .. -----···-·-·
D, n,
D,
D,
Dug-Dr
2 miles W. of Cramerton ___ •••• W. S. Quinn-·-·-····· Robbins .••. __ •••• _. Dr
._ .• do •. ·--··················· Arthur Suggs •.••...•• _ ... do .•.• ---······· Dr
4 miles SE. of c._,wnia.. •• . •• • Plantation Pile .. _..... llamiltoo_ •• _ .••. _.. Dr
l}i mile!! NW. of Cramertoo ...• L. W. Fari~·····-··-· IU!ph RoLliiD! ...... Dr.
..•. do ••. ·-·-··-·············· Chutth of God .•. -·-······-··············· Cr-Dr
_ .•• do .• --•···-··········---·· W. E. Mitchell •••••• -. Ralph Robbins.·-··· Dr
. -·_Jo. __ . __ ·---· .••••... ·----_. __ do._ •••••.••. __ ·--__ .. do __ ... __ .. ---·. Dr
.• __ do ••. __ . __ ._.-· •• -···· ... _ ·w. J. Sherer. __ .•..••... __ do._ •. ·-... ·-·--Dr
_ .• _do .• --·---··········--···· R. Q. McAtl"tr •... _. __ ..•• do ... ·-·-···-··· Dr
I ,,, ..•• do .....••.••••............ 1 R= ""''"········ ......•••.•......... C~D,
I
D,1,th
of ..-,U
(fttl}
" '" 193
390
527
300
28'
,00
0,3
" 300
225
3'0
325
100+1
132
128
118
132
"' 160
103
65
80
100
112½
86
" il½
1~2½
305
39
105
i2½
500
55½
83
IOI
83
" 121
39
Di..meter
11( Wfll
(inrhct)
:J-2
10-8-<
10
3
10
10
..... .i. ........ .
90 I· ...... .
I
I
·······.!..········ !
·····--··········--
'
:~ i::., j. ········
i
•..••• --1-.
........ i ......... .
60 i 23
--··--··I····-·--··
90
80
80
-······· 35 to -tO
35
10
5 5/8 -·--····
5 5/8 ~o
5 5/8 ~9
5 5/8 -·······
31
" "
22.-tO
5 5/8 ·····-·-. ···----··
5 5/8 50
5 5/8 50 37
5 5/8 ··-· ·-·-.. ··•·•
5 5/8 82 22
.
\'ie]J
(,:.p.m.)
10+
10
30
"
35
60
2½
85
116
60
I½
"
12
5
7
Tot•l tu,.nJ.
n~ {fitld
teslll)
(p.p.m.)
'" 60
60
60
60
" ,o
50
60
50
60
" 60
30
·-···-······
"
3H ···-··----··
13½ ••··•·••••••
1' ' 8
II
30
"
25
"
35
'
" 27
2-3
"
20
3¼
75
90
"
35
35
"
35
125
1<0
25
35
25
Schist. \'alley.
Fbt.
62° r. Schist. llill.
63° r. Schi$t. Comf'l,ny •ell
2: north side of plant. Ora•.
Schist. Compan>· ..-tll 1; ea.st
rod of mill. Hill.
62¼° F. &bi.st. Slope.
63!{° F. &hist. Slopc.
&hist. Hill.
66° F. Schist. Wtll is crook•
ed and turbiD, (2.0 ·1 be HI
lo..-er tbu 85 ft. so pumJl,'I
onlr 35 J.p.m. Slopc.
Schist. Bthiod church. llill.
Schist. \'idded 60 galiowi per
mioute 1rben dri!J.:-d. Dra"
Schist. Slope.
Draw. .-1.nalyai.s.
6~¼° F. Schist. rump Ht
lo yield ~5 (.p.m. Draw.
Schist. Rid~.
Schist. Yidded 18 g.p.m.
1rbt11 drilkd. Ora..-.
62° F. Schist. Hill.
Sc.hilt. Well ahandoned: 11ot
eooua:b ,rater. Hill.
Schist. 62° F. At upper end
of mill. Slope.
Across road from mill. Slope .
Schist • .-1.t \o..-tr end of mill.
Slop,.
Schill. Hill.
SchlsL Slope.
Do.
Schiat. Draw.
Do.
Do.
Schist.
Granite. S!opc.
Supplie1 W house,. Dru.
Scb.ial Ifill.
Schi1t. Slope.
63° F. Schist. On..-.
Schiat. D11t 31 feet. Rock is
fi.11c 1traiued; grceD t.o gray
.chi.st. Hill.
Gn.o.itc. Slope.
63° F?. Gruite. Hill.
Schill. Slope.
Hill
Suppliei ii bou,ei.. lliU.
Schist.· }lot~; bot ~nou~h
1nlcr. Slope.
Slope •
Slope.
A well 85 fttt dttp, 50 feet
from "'II 12i-Yielda I
gallon per minute. Slope.
I½····----···· Soft wale. Slope.
I
I
\\'dl [,OC,ATION
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORT!i CAROLINA
DRILU:R
Dc11th
of wt.II
(foci)
c:;Lllin11: (Ced l,dow
(f~t) &urfaC!')
Yield
(g.p.m.)
55
Totai hard-
11os (fidd
ICllb)
(p.p.m.)
--1---------1-------1-------1--------------1---'---1----1--------110.
I:: 2 milf'II ~W. of Cramttlon ....•• T. Ho~---------····· Ralph Robt..ins ....•• Dr
••.. do ••••......••••.......••• L.C. lla&Ni ......••••..•• do ••••••..•..... Dr
131 .... do .....•.........••.•......... do .................... do............ Or
I 132
133 __ .. do .... __ ...................... do................ Rot.bins............ Dr
I
I
13~ •••. do ..••.••.......••.•.......... do ....••••••...... (?). ...••••.•...•..• C'r-Dr
¼ mile E. of Louil. .......... Dr. J. W. H"id
JI. T. ll.nrU1,nantJ. Ralph kol•llirui. ..•.. Dr
Lo.-"U. __ ..••.... __ . ••• • . . .. . J. R. lludson...... .. . . •• . .• . . . . ••. . . . . . • . Or
137 ..•• do .. ·--·-··--·····-····-··\ Xational Wr:,xinii: Co ...••..•....••..••••.. Dr
138 •• --do ...•••••••••..•••••••....••. do .•.....••• ·-······-···············-· Dr
139 •.•• do .•........••••••..•.••••.••. do •••••.••....••••...•••.•••••.......• Dr
HO I mile SW. of Lowell........... W. A. Fronrl"'r2er .•.•• Ralph Rohhins...... Dr
1it .••. do·--····················· :-irher'1Camp ..••... _ •••• do .••..•..••.••• Dr
112 2~.1 mile, E. of Gul.Onia .••.... Gaston Country Cluh ....•. do.............. Dr
1~3 .... do .•.•.•.....•••••..••..•...•. do .•••••••..••••••...• do ••••.......•.. Dr
!<5
2 miles E.ofGastoni.a ...•••.•• Aken !.lotor Lines Co ....•• do ••......••.... Dr
J!{ mil" XE. of G&.!ltonia.... •• .-\. )I. Smyrr Mfg...... Ralph Robbins...... Dr I IH
U6 .... do .•••• ·-··········-·-···· .... do ••••••••.•.•••••.... do .•••• ·-······· Dr
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
U7 ~ mile!i KE. of Gastonia........ Ranlo Mfp:. Co ...•••••.... do .•• -.......... Dr
HS .••• do ..••......•• -.•.•.•••••. Teltilu. lne.
Priscilla Plant....... Syd not \\"ell Co... • • Dr
1~9 .... do •••• ·-·················· .... do .•••••••..•••••• Ralph RobbiM .....• Dr
15,0 ••• _Jo .•••••••• -....•••••...... _ .. do ..••••••....••••.. _.do .••••••.. _ .... Dr
!bl .... do •••••••••..•••••••.......... do ...••.•.....•••• \'a. )beh. Co ...•..• Dr
152 ..•• do ••••••... _ ....••••......... _do ...•••••....••••.....•••••••.•...... Dr
153 .... do •.••••••• _ ....•• ----··· Rn Spinning Co ....•.. Ralph RohbiM •••. -. Dr
15~ .••• do •.........•••••...••...•.... do .•••••.•••..••••..•• do.·-··-········ Dr
155 •••. do ...••••••.• ·-··········· ..•• do .•••••....•••••• (?) ••.••.••••••••••• Dr
156 2½ mil" XE. of G&.!ltooi.a •••..• Grovt'II Thrnd Co..... P.alpb RobhiM...... Dr
157 ...• do ••............••..•......... do ...•••.••....•.•...• do .• ·-··-·-····· Dr
158 .... do .••••• ·-··-·-·····-····· •••• do .• -••.......•••••••• do •.....•..••••• Dr
159 _ ..• do •..........••••• -·-····· .... do .•••••••••.•...•.•.. do ••••• ·-······· Dr
160 .••. do .......••••••... ·-······ ...• do .••••. ·-········ •.•• do ••••.......... Dr
161 ••.. do ...•.•.•••••....•.••..••..•• do.-•-············ •.•• do·-············ Dr
162 .... do.·-··-················-· ._ .. do ...•••.•... --··· .•.. do ..•••••....... Dr
163 .••. do ......•••..•........•.•• nint ~lfi;:. Co ..••••. -•••.• do ......••.••.•• Dr
!6~ ..•• ,lo._ ......•.•••...........•... do ..•.••........•....• do •••••••....... Dr
165 .... do .•••...........••.••........ do .....•..•• -.••...... do ......•.•.•... Dr
166 I¼ miles X. of Gastooia ...•.•• C. A. Uulley •....•••.•••• do ••. ·-········· Dr
167 Gastonia.·-·················· Gren!on Milb .....•••• (?) ••••••••••••••••• Dr
168 .... do ••.•..... ·-········-···· Sunri3c Dairy ...••••. -Ralph Robbins ..•••• Dr
169 11 170
Gastoni.a .. _ .•....••..•....... Sunrur Dair}' •••••• -.. Ralph Robbins ...... Dr
I mi!eS.ofGastonill ......••.•• Tutiiei, Inc.
Seminole Plant...... . . . . . .. . . . . . • . . . . . . . Dr u 111 1¼ mile.s S. of Ga..,tonia ........ Ruby Cotton MiU .............••.•........ Dr
li2 ..•. do ..... ·-·············-··· .. _.do ................ -············ Dr
173 .••• Jo ............. ·-········· .... do ......................••••.•........ Dr
D
1'
66
II<
523
11111
11111
l!!O j
%i
5! j
":: I
1051--z
llO
:?51
\JO
;g
500
200
\JO
191
"' 16.I
\'5
" ,o
85
IJ2
60
69½
61
167
IJJ
265(7)
IJ6
120
\J5
185
\S,
5 5/8 " ··········1
5 5/Sj ,0 .. ·····1 5 s,s! so ..........
10.s '° 21
' 5 5;:ii. ..... ····•·•··.
1---------------··
"
I :::::: ::::::::::
5 5;s! ss
5 5,s: ....... .
i ...... ··········
112
5 5,S "
5 518 60
5 5:8 ········
19.1
J8
18
5 5/8 ......•• ·····-····
5 5/8 8{ SO
5 5/8 •·•••••• ······••·•
5 5/8 ·•••••·. ·••••••··•
6 ...••.•. ·-········
' ' 55/8 ..•..... 50
5 5/8 ......•.. ····•····
5 5/8 ~~
5 5/8 " "
1, "
15
8
' 0 '
11111+
II
20 ,o
,,
\j
60
20 ,.,
20
18
1,
12
20
,.
i
10
102
I 10
10,
18
" ,0 ,,,
1,' ;;o'
' 16
12
12 I
II
8
JO
20
JO
1,
21
··········-· 10
············
230
············
" "
············
········-··· ............
50
'°
············ ·-··········
" ············
JO
"
'
············
············
IIO
···-········
50
···········-
············ 11,
" ············ ············
············
···-········
········-··· " ·······-···· J-0
"
············
····-·······
············
JO
Slope.
SchiaL Hill.
SchUll . Not llSed. :Ko wakr.
llili.
63¼° F. Supplies milb .,,
town. Slof)C.
Schist. """ only ;. cmer•
gcney. Slofle.
Schist. """ ooly ;. emer•
geoey.
Schist. Draw.
Supplies 35 house and uvcral
businesses. Draw.
Kot ;. =-W•ttt reported
to be hard. Draw.
Do. Slope.
&hClt. Slope .
···············-··-········· Schist. Water ttporttd to be
eorto1ivc. Draw.
Schist. Draw.
l\ot 115ed: not enoui:h waler.
&hist. Slor,e.
Schist. Slope. , othcr aimibr .,u, ,1 mill
and vilb12:c. fbt.
Yielded 21 ,:alloru • minute
whrn drilled. Hill.
Draw.
~ot uaed. Tested at 65 g.p.m.
when drillcd. Yield de-tt,..., lo 20 g.p.m. wheo
a~odoned. Hi□.
Schist. Not """' capped.
Hill.
Schiiit. Kot """' espped.
Draw.
62½° F. Schist and qlllll'tzite.
Draw.
Schist. Yiclded 25 to 30 g.p.m.
when drilled. Draw.
Schist. Hill.
Schist. Abandoned --water became muddy. Draw
Hill.
Granite. Water obt..Aioed d 80
fttt. Draw.
61½° F. Granitc. Draw.
Granite. Draw.
Granite. We□ " re.s-er1:0ir.
Draw.
Granite. Draw.
Granite. Draw.
Granite. Hill.
Granite. Draw.
Do.
Do.
Supplie:i II housea. Schist.
Slope.
Schist. Draw.
Schist. Water obt~intd at ;o -r~t. Slope.
Granite. Draw.
Granite. Slope.
62° F. Granite. Draw.
Granite. Dra.w .
Granite. HiU.
•
• , ,
► •
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTII CAROLINA
Ru:mw.s OF \'h:1.I.S IX G.\STO:< Cot:;'\TY-Continucd
Wdl LOC.O.TION 0"'1'11:R 0RIU.CR T)'f>COf
,,. wdl
I!,( 111ik:i S. of Gutoo.ia ••....•• Tcxtikt, Inc.
(hee()\a Plant __ _ .•• -·-·······------···· Dr
175 I½ milu S. of Gut.onia ••....•• Dilan Mill:! ......•...• Ralph Rol>bitu1 ...•.. Dr
176 \ •••• do .••••••••••••.••.••• ---.• -•• do ..•. ---• --••..••. --.do •••. ----...... Dr
Iii l :! 111ilcsS.ofGut.onia ..••....•. Tutiln. Inc.
1 Victory Pb.nt. •.•..•...•••..•••.•••••••• Dr
2½ 111iles S. 1,1£ Gutoni.a. •....••• Tcxtik-s. luc.
Mycts Pla11t .....•.. R..1.lpb Robbins •.•••. Dr
, • __ .do ••..•••.••....••..•..•.....• do ...••.••.......•••.. do.............. Dr
180 / ..•• do •..••..•••...••.••••••.....• do ••••...•.......•.... do ••......••••.. Dr
181 I 2¼ wik1 S. of Ga.stonia........ Rci;:.l11111over MilU, Iuc.
(Hanover Pl:i.nt) ...•..•• do ..•••......... Dr
!S2 · •••• do ......•.....••..•••.....••.. do .•••......••..•• War'!' •••••••••••••• Or
J8l i •..• do .••.•••.••••..•••....••••... do ••.....•••••.•.• Robbicu •.....•••••• Dr
ISt I J½ miles S. or Gastonia .••...•. TeitilC!I, Inc. I · Ridge Plant •••....•.... do.............. Dr
It-5 1 ...• do .•..•••..•••..•••...••••.... do ••......••••....•••. do .••......••••• Dr
' 186 l 2½ miles SE. of Gastonia ...••. J. A. Dn.d$b.a• •......••.. do.............. Dr
\Si I J½ roilea SE. or Ga.slonia.. .••. Ro~rt M. Bn..ndon •••.••• do.............. Dr
188 L ..• do ••.•••..•••..••••••.•••• H. R. Kendrick •......••.. do •••.•...•••••• Dr
189 Gulonia..................... Fin:stone Milb, Inc .•••..•• do.............. Dr
191
102
193
"' 19'
1'6
19;
198
"' ,oo
201
"" 203
'" "'
206
207
•... do ••..•••..••••..•••...••••... do ••.......••••••••••• do .••••••••••... Dr
I::::!:::······················ ····::················ .o., RobbiM ....... g;
' I::::::··:::::::::::::::::::::: ::::!:::::: ::: :::::::: . Robbins.::::::::::: g;
I I½ mile, W.of Gutonia ••••••• Parkdale Mill, Inc .....•... do .•••••..•••... Dr
l. ... do .••..••...••••.•••....••••.• do .•••.•.•••••••..•.•• do ...••.•••••••• Dr
Dlooro Milb, Inc •...•.•....•••••••..•.•..•. Dr
Tuti\e,, Inc.
Arlington Plaut. .•••....••••..••..•••••• Dr
2 roiles W. of Gutonia •••.....• Thr~. Inc •..••••..• Robbioa •••••••••••• Dr
•••• do •.••..•••..•••••...••.....•• dn ••....•••••...•• J.S. Hinsoo ......•• Dr
•... do .••..•••..••••.•••.•..•••••• do ..••••••...••.•• Robbins .••.•••••••• Dr
.••• do •.••..•••...••••...•••....•• do ••....••••.....• J. S. Hinaon ••....•• Dr
...• do .•.••...••....•••....••••... do .•••....•.••••..••.. do .••••••••••.•. Dr
2¼ miles W. of Gutooia .•••... Textiles. Inc.
Myrtle Plant ••••..•••....••••••••••••.. Dr
I¼ miles NW. of Ga.slonia .•..• Clyde Bradford....... Ralph Robbi1111 •.•••• Dr
•... do .••..•••..•.••..••••••.. D. ,v. Dawn ••.....•••...• do ••••.•.....•.. Or
:?OS •... do .•....••....••....••••.. 0. L. Rhyne ••......•••... do ••••.••••..... Dr
zw 2½ milct NW. of Guloni• ..••• 0. R. Jenkins ..••..•...••• do •......•.••••• Dr
210 j .•.. do .••...••.....•......•... M. D. Jenk.in8 .••.....••... do ..••••••••••.. Dr
211 l. ... do •...•...••.•..••••....•• D. l,, Wyont •.....••....•. do •••........••. Dr
212 •1·3··v.·,'m":,l·:,,·N··,·,;.·,·,·G··.~~~·,:,,··.·.·.·.·. J. Froneberii;er •.....••.... do •••.....••.... Dr
213 ...., -= D. G. Burns. ..•..••.. V,.. MM:h. Co .•••..• Dr
214 ( 2 miles E. of lleMCmer City ..... Ragan Spinnin11: Co ............••.......... Dr
' 2!5 i. ... do .•...•......••...........•.• do ......••........ Ralph Ro0biru ••.... Dr
' ' 216 ! ...• do .....••.....••.....••......• do .......•............ do .••........... Dr
!
:217 l 1~{ mile, E. of B~mtr Citr ... Ideal M11.chine Shop ... R•lr,b RobbiM .•.••. Dr
Depth
of well
(f~t)
"'
"' SJ
135
'10
103½
180
26i
llO
185
l:?O
" " " 80±
125
1'5
107
92
(!)
180
'10
98
160
105
"' 16½
"' 900-1000
160
SJ
6'½
100
100
110½
71
"' 110
2il½
"'
238!,,
""
Diamctcr Depth of
of•ell easing
(im:h~) (feet)
5 5/8 •·····•·
5 5/8 ••••..••
6
Water lcvd
(red ill'lo"
surlaec)
IS
10
5 5/8 ••••···· •••••.••••
5 5/B ••••••••...••••.••
6
8 112
5 5/8 ····•••• ····••••••
5 5/8 35 10
5 5/8 •••••.•• •·•·••••••
'5/8
5 5/8
5 5/8
8
6
6
6
5 5/8
5 5/8
6
" '° 27
100
100
"
80
13
"
• 13
10.2
10.6
5,0j
"
10
Yidd
cirm.)
35
"
12
"
'80
20
' IS
I"
I
IS
12
10
" I 8
1
18
10
' 12
I IS
'
Total hard-I
ncs:1 (firld I
te3U) ,
(r.p.m.)
J5
J5
,0
J5
J5
" ,0
"
3S
J5
30
' '
······-· ·········· ........ ············
6
5 5/8
5 5/8
38
3S
31
20
5 5/8 •••••..•.•••••.•..
5 5/8 15
5 5/8
6
6
6
6
5 5/8
40 35
15± •·••·•····
80
106 "'
110
10 30
8 ............
10 J5
I
,0
" " 11S " ' J5
' "
'50
"
"
ltr;•bu:s
Granite. U11e 11 3 11.P. ('lump.
Hill.
Granite.
Do.
Draw.
Ori1tinallr yield Ni 25
FL&t.
Granitt. Wrll at mill. Flat.
61½° F. Gn..nite. Ori1tina][y
yieldf'd 29 1u1.m. Draw.
Granite. Wrll in ri\la,:e. Hill
62}'J° F. Granite. \\'rib 181
182 •nd 183 supply wattt
for plant and vilb.ge. Analy.
1i:I of ,..,.,n froro well 182
in table. Tem~turc well
182, u° F.
Grr.nite. Draw.
Granite. Draw.
Granite ctOilS out 60 frtl from
well. Hill.
Granite. Draw.
Schi.L ~laL
Schilit. Fbt.
Gra.nite. Water rep<X"ted ao[t.
Draw.
Granite. Wtll I; not in UR,
Draw.
Granite. Well 2; not in u,e.
Draw.
Granite. Well 3. Ora.•.
Well~; not in UR. Granite.
Draw.
Granite. Well 5. Ora•.
Granite. Well 6,
Granite. Ora•.
Gn..nitr. Slo ...
64½° F. Granite. Hill.
62}.( F. Gr•nite. llill.
Gr1111ite. Not in me. Draw.
Granite. Abudooed. Draw .
Granite • Not in use. s~ ...
63¼° F. Gn..t1ite .
Granite. Draw .
Granite. Slope.
Granite. Slope.
Gr•nite. Supplies houses.
Slor,e.
Granite. Hill.
Granite. Hill.
Grani!t. Hill
Slope.
····························
Supplif:11 lar~ farm. i:ilope.
Schist. Old well in fidd, nol
used. b1ope.
62¼° F.-Schist. Company
wt\l 1. On.•.
Comp,.ny wtll 2 (at school
hotJ$e). Hill.
Schist. Dr••-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GEOLOGY AND GROUND WATER IN THE CHARLOTTE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA 57
RECOIUJS OF WEI.LS 1:-. G.,STO:-i COUNTY-Continued
lxpth
Trr>e o[ of well
Diamet~ Dtr,th of Wat« k,·d
I Total hard• i
n('S1 (field ·
(,oc~TIOS DmLU:11 of ..-di casin,: ([N:l lido.,.. •Yield
(g.p.m.)
llt•u111.11
110.
wfll (fed) {inchca) (fN:I) 1urf1N:)
"' Bessemer City................ Algodon Mfg. Co .•..•••••. do.............. Dr
219 ..•• do ••..••..••...••.•••..••• Ouge Mfg. Co ...••••. ------··-----·------Dr
'..!20 I½ milei SE.of Beacmcr City__ L. A. Wolfe........... Ralph RobbiQ.!I...... Dr
221 2 mile11 SW. of Bes.,emcrCity •.. R. L. Lewi.I Dairy ••...••.• do ...••••..•••.. Dr
222 2JimiletSW.of8es,etDttCity. PincGro,.cGriU ...••.•••. do ••...••••....• Dr
223 I mile NW.o{Kino Mountain •• Earle E. Carpenter-....•••• do .•••..•••••... Dr
:?2~ MOU11t.t.in \'icw.. ••....••••... Frkda Mfg. Co .•••.... --············-····· Du,;
225 •.•• do .••.•••.••.•.••..••..••.•..• do ..••..••• ---···-•••••••..•••.....••• Du,:
226 ••.. do ...• ••···-···-·········· R.H. Hook •..•••..••. Ralph Robbins .•.... Dr
227 ..•• do •..•••..•...•••.•••.•••. Hartty flume .••••.....•• do .•.•••••.•••.. Dr
228 ½ mik NE. of Mountain
Vie•···········-··········· Mn. Eutt RobcrU.... •••.••••...•••.....• Duit
2Z9 2}i milts SE. of Mountain
Vic• •.•.••..••••••..••...•• A. L Dial. .••.•••.••. Ralph Robbias ....•• Dr
230 3 miles S.of Mountain Vic• ••.. J. A. Stto(IJ)C •••••...• ·······-············ Br
231 Hi miles S. of Mountain" \-"ic• .• \\'iboo and Brown •••• -••.••••••.•••••.•••• Dr
232 5mik1S.o!Gutonia ••.••••..• T. L.Horis .••... -..•• RalphRolibias ...... Dr
233 5 1/3 mikJI S. of Gastonia._ .•.. E"Rn Brandoo .••••.•••••• do •.•••••..••••• Dr
234 6mileaS. ofGut.onia ..•••••.•• C. E. Hooeytult. .••••••.• do .•....••.....• Dr
235 •••. do ..•••..••...•••••••••.•. W. L. HutchUOo ••.... Tom York. •..••.•.. Cr-Dr
236 7 miJt.S.olGutooia •.••••.... Tom Sparrow •••. -.•••••..••••••.••••..•.• Du,:
237 7½ miles S. of Cut.o11ia.-••••...••. do •...•••.. •··-·-· Ralph Robbias...... Or
238 4¼'mileaSE.ofGut.oaia •••.•• Carroll Ken-••••...••••••. do ••...••••..... Dr
2311 4¼milesSE.ofGastonia •. _ ••• W. S. Tomoce
FaifTic• Dairy •••••••••• do ••.••••.•.•••• Dr
240 ••.. do ..•••.•••..••••••••••••. Gaatonia Airport.-.••• U.S. Arm)· •••••.... Dr
2H 5¼ milea SE. of Gaat.oaia ••..•• Sandy Plain Church ••• Tom York ••••...••• Cr-Dr
242 6½ miles SE. of Gaat.onia.. •..• D. F. Huriaoo •••••••• Geo~ S1ephc11S011 .• Cr·Dr
H3
""
116
160
165½
100
" 17
IOI
91
"
137½
"
" 108
" 100
90
61
"'
"'
"" 102
90
68
5 5/8 !Ol " " :s'ot used; ..-ater ~ported to
be loo hard. Flat.
6 50 15 ••..•..•.•.. Pumped al 351.p.m. but will
not 1111intain this yield Flat.
5 5/8 62 57 40 ...•........ Slope.
5 5/8 13t 65 16 40 Schist. Slope.
5 5/8 ..•••••. ··-······• , 20 t5 I Schi5t. Slope.
5 5/8 so 50 5 55 I Schi5t. Hill.
2t u 37 .68 ··-····· ••••...•...• 11 Schist. Suppliei l'llb.,:c. Hill.
24 17 6.5,0 I 15 •••.••.•.••. Gravel?. Valley.
5 5/8 •..••••• 61 I 25+ 55 I Schist. Slope.
5 5/8 56 <13 50f W l Schist. Ora ...
30 0 80.98 .c ••••••••.••••••••• ! Schist. Hill.
5 5/8 ••·•···• ....••.••• ' 4-5
12 (6.22
6 10
5 5/8 ·••••·•• ◄8.00
5 5/8 •·••··•· ······-···
5 5/8 ····•··· ····-·····
40 48
36 61 56.25
5 5/8 •••..••• ·····-····
5 5/8 -·······
6 78
2
' "
"
" "
• 1 •••••••
' I 1'
15-20
I
,.
6
10
,0
<-5
'
n..
20 Schiit. Supply failed durin~
autumn of 19W and 19H.
Hill.
50 I Schilt. Hill .
45 I Gt111i~. Hill.
~ I Schist. Slope.
:!0 I Schist.
••••.•••..•• ; Gra_nite ..
35 i Schut. Hill.
•••••••..••• : 62° F. &:hist. C-4 6S to i 75 feet. Hill.
20 . Schist. Slope ..
I
30 l Schist. Draw.
••••••..••.. , Do.
············\ Hill
1
............
1
Water repoc'ted 10ft. mu.
ANALYSES OF Gaourrn WATER FRO?,{ GASTON COUNTY,• N. C.
(Numbers at heads or columns correspond to numbers in table of Well data)
(parts per million)
~
' IO
Silici& (SiOt). -•••.•••••.••••••. 32 ,0
lroa (Fe) .•• ······-· •••••...••• .23 ...
Calcium (Ca) •••• _ ••• ···-·· •• ·-· " 31
M&gDC11ium (Ma:).···-·········· 3.7 ,.o
Sodium aad pota.saium (NA+K) •• II ,.,
Carbon•~ ((Xh) ••••••• -·-······ 0 0
Biearboo.atc (HC01) .•••••••••••• 160 '" Sulfa~ (SO.J .•••..•••......•••. 6. 7 10
Chloride (Cl) ....•• ··-·· •. ·--· •• 7 .0 ,.,
Fluoride (F) .•••••. ···-· •••.•••• .3 .2
Nitrate (NO,) .••...••••.....••• .6 .o
Oimolved 110lids ••..••.••..••.•.• 166 138 ------
Total liard11~ u CaCO, ...•..••. "' "
Date of coUectioo. ··-·· •........ 11/20/~-; 11/20/H
• Ao,Jy,iJ made by U.S. Geo\Oftieal Survey .
.. Fio .. onc,-lw! lt-P-m. from hofllblc11de 1:oeis,.
a Fe in .o\ution .01
II " .,
31 27 " .ti 8.6 ·" " It 10 ,., ,., l.l
" 0.3 8.3
0 0 0
107 84 ,o
113 ,. , 1.9
2 .2 u 13
1.0 .0 .0
I. I .o 10
290 l01 111
158 " t3
11(20/Hl 2/16/48 2/16/~8
I
! Sprina:,.
" " " 182 I (Gaat.oo
I No.A)
:
36 " 37 3l 23
.08 ·" .09 ,: 1.0 .211
II ,., 12 I 8.3 '-'
6.2 ,., •. 2 1.3 '·' ,.2 ,., 6.4 ' IO '-'
0 0 0 I 0 0
" 37 " 31 31
3.0 2.9 1.2 I 1.3 u
7 .• 8.4 1.6 " .. ,
.0 .o .I I .I .0
8.8 It 1.6 ,. , ' .2
Ill 101 IOI .. "
" ti .. I " "
2/13/48 2/16/48 8/11/t~ 8/11/45 I 5/10/0
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
~
a
~
□
D
'
I
I
I
l
!
!
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
' I ,
' I
I
I
REFERENCE 11 i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
'I
United States
Department of
Agriculture
Soil
Conservation
Service
In cooperation with
North Carolina
Department of Natural
Resources and
Community Development,
North Carolina
Agricultural Research
Service, North Carolina
Agricultural Extension
Service, Gaston County
Board of Commissioners,
and Gaston Soil and
Water Conservation
District
Soil \Survey of
Gast:on County,
North Carolina
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
:
Gaston County. North Carolina
Steepness of slope and small stones are tl1e main
limitations for recreational development.
This Alamance Variant soil is in capability subclass
!Ve. The woodland ordination symbol is 7 A for loblolly
pine.
ApB-Appling sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes.
This soil is well drained. II is on broad. smooth ridges
throughout the county. Some of the larger areas are
southeast of Gastonia and east of Cherryville. The
areas are irregular in shape and range lrom 4 to 1 00
acres.
Typically. this soil has a brown sandy loam surface
layer that is about 10 inches thick. The subsoil extends
to a depth of about 48 inches. It is brownish yellow
sandy clay loam in the upper part and yellowish brown
sandy clay in the middle part. The lower part is
yellowish brown sandy clay loam mottled with red,
yellow. and strong brown. The underlying material to a
depth of 60 inches is multicolored saprolite that has a
sandy clay loam texture.
Permeability is moderate. and the shrink-swell
potential is low. The water table is not within a depth of
6 feet. Depth to bedrock is more than 6 feet. This soil is
strongly acid or very strongly acid unless lime has been
added. The hazard of erosion is moderate in bare,
unprotected areas.
-s Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of
Cecil. Helena, Vance, and Wedowee soils. The Cecil
soils are red and moderately eroded. They are on small
knolls and ridgetops. The Helena soils, along
intermittent drainageways, are moderately well drained
and slowly permeable. The Vance soils are slowly
permeable and are in intermingled areas, in saddles,
and on toe slopes. The Wedowee soils. on narrow side
slopes. have a thinner, clayey subsoil. Some
intermingled areas of soils east of Cherryville have a
high content of mica and a thinner subsoil. Special map
symbols indicate small areas of severely eroded or very
gravelly soils, wet spots, and large gullies. The included
soils make up 1 0 to 15 percent of this map unit.
-This Appling soil is used mainly as cropland or
pasture. The rest is used msinly as woodland or is in
urban uses.
The main crops are corn. soybeans, and small
grains. Steepness of slope, surface runoff, and
susceptibility to erosion are the main limitations.
Conservation practices that reduce erosion and add
organic matter are needed (fig. 6). Tall fescue and
ladino clover are the main forage plants where this soil
is used for hay or pasture.
Where t11is soil is used as woodland, common trees
are loblolly pine: shortleaf pine, Virginia pine. southern
red oak. white oak. hickory, sweetgum, and yellow
poplar. Common understory plants are flowering
dogwood, sourwood, blackberry, eastern redcedar,
running cedar, and red maple. There are no major
limitations for wciodland use and management.
~There are few' limitations for building site and
recreational development. The hazard of erosion is
moderate where (egetation is removed at construction
sites, and erosion control practices are needed. The
moderate permeability is the main limitation for septic
tank absorption fields.
-·-This Appling sbil is in capability subclass lie. The
woodland ordination symbol is SA for loblolly pine.
CeB2-Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes, eroded. This soil is well drained. It is on broad
' ridges throughou\ the county. Some of the larger areas
are around Gastonia, Dallas, Cherryville, and Stanley.
The areas are irregular in shape and range from 1 0 to
200 acres. I
Typically, this soil has a yellowish red sandy clay
loam surface layd,r that is about 6 inches thick. The
subsoil extends to a depth of about 58 inches. It is red
clay in the upper part and red clay loam in the lower
part. The underlying material to a depth of 80 inches is
red saprolite that has a loam texture.
Permeability is ,moderate, and the shrink-swell
potential is low. The water table is not within a depth of
6 feet. Depth to bedrock is more than 6 feet. The
surface layer is medium acid to very strongly acid
' unless lime has been added. The subsoil is strongly
acid or very strongly acid. The hazard of erosion is
severe in bare, un'protected areas.
Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of
' Appling, Gaston, Madison, and Pacolet soils. The
Appling soils are more yellow and are less eroded than
Cecil. soil. They are on the more level landscapes. The
Gaston soils are dark red and are less acid. The
Madison soils have a higher content of mica and a
thinner, clayey su~soil. They occur at random within the
map unit. The Pacblet soils, on narrow ridges and side
slopes, have a thin'ner, clayey subsoil. In places, mostly
in hardwood forestt are some areas of slightly eroded
Cecil soils that have a sandy loam surface layer.
Special map symb6ls indicate small areas of very
gravelly or stony sclils, wet spots, and large gullies. The
included soils make up 1 0 to 15 percent of this map
unit.
This Cecil soil is-used mainly as cropland or pasture
The rest is used as· woodland.
Gaston County. North Carolina
.recreational development: however. the l1azard of
erosion is severe where vegetation is removed at
l onstruction sites. and erosion control practices are
eeded. The moderate permeability is the main
limitation for septic tank absorption fields.
Ii This Cecil soil is in capability subclass Ille. The
lt-"oodland ordination symbol is 7C for loblolly pine.
CeD2-Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent
lls1opes, eroded. This soil is well drained. It is on side
ll;;1opes throughout the county. Some of the larger areas
are around Gastonia. Dallas, Cherryville, and Stanley.
arhe areas are irregular in shape and range from 5 to 75
&cres
Typically, this soil has a yellowish red sandy clay
.oam surface layer that is about 6 inches thick. The
15ubsoil extends to a depth of about 58 inches. It is red
clay in the upper part and red clay loam in the lower
lifart. The underlying material to a depth of 80 inches is
.ed saprolite that has a loam texture.
Permeability is moderate, and the shrink-swell
potential is low. The water table is not within a depth of
Iii, feet. Depth to bedrock is more than 6 feet. The
a,urface layer is medium acid to very strongly acid
unless lime has been added. The subsoil is strongly
rcid or very strongly acid. The hazard of erosion is
.evere in bare, unprotected areas.
Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of
Gaston, Madison, Pacolet, and Wedowee soils. The
IGaston soils are dark red and less acid than the Cecil
.oil. They are on the lower part of the slopes. The
Madison and Wedowee soils have a thinner, clayey
ll;ubsoil and occur at random within the map unit. In
aiddition, Madison soils have a high content of mica,
and Wedowee soils are more yellow and have a
1111oderate shrink-swell potential. In places, mostly in
111.ardwood forests, are some areas of slightly eroded
Cecil soils that have a sandy loam surface layer.
Special map symbols indicate small areas of very
airavelly or stony soils, rock outcrops, and large gullies.
Ehe inclusions make up 1 0 to 15 percent of this map
unit.
I This Cecil soil is used mainly as woodland. The rest
s used as cropland or pasture.
Where this soil is used as woodland, common trees
~
re loblolly pine, shortleaf pine, Virginia pine, southern
ed oak, northern red oak, white oak, yellow poplar, and
ickory. Common understory plants are flowering
dogwood, sourwood, American holly, black cherry,
ltastern redcedar, red maple, and Christmas fern. The
roded condition of the soil is the main limitation for
woodland use and management.
n
D
17
Where this soil is cultivated, the main crops are corn I ' soybeans, and small grains. Steepness of slope, texture
of the surface layer, surface runoff, and the
susceptibility to erosion !"re the main limitations. Good
tilth is difficult to maintain because of the sandy clay
loam surface layer. As t~is layer dries after a hard rain,
a crust commonly forms,• and clods form if the soil is
worked when wet. This limitation causes difficulties in .
seedbed preparation and can affect germination,
resulting in poor or uneven crop growth. Because of the
slope. erosion is a sever~ hazard. Conservation
practices that reduce erdsion and surface runoff and
that add organic matter Jre needed. T.all fescue and
ladino clover are the maih forage plants ·where this soil
• I ,s used for hay or pasture.
Steepness of slope is the main limitation for building
site and recreational development. The hazard of
erosion is severe where vegetation is removed at
construction sites, and erosion control practices are
needed. The moderate p~rmeability and steepness of
slope are the main limitations for septic tank absorption
fields.
This Cecil soil is in capability subclass \Ve. The
woodland ordination symbol is 7C for loblolly pine.
I
CIB-Cecil-Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent
slopes. This map unit co~sists of intermingled areas of ' Cecil soil and Urban land-: Cecil soil is well drained. It is
on broad ridges mostly in 1and around Gastonia,
Cherryville, Dallas, and St_anley. Cecil soil makes up 50
to 65 percent of the map unit, and Urban land makes
up 25 to 50 percent. The areas are irregular in shape
and range from 1 0 to 400 •acres.
Typically, this Cecil soi ti has a yellowish red sandy
clay loam surface layer that is about 6 inches thick. The
subsoil extends to a depth' of about 58 inches. It is red
clay in the upper part and 'red clay loam in the lower ' part. The underlying material to a depth of 80 inches is
red saprolite that has a lo~m texture.
This Cecil soil has moderate permeability, and lhe
shrink-swell potential is low. The water table is not
within a depth of 6 feet. Depth to bedrock is more than
6 feet. The surface layer is, medium acid to very
strongly acid unless lime has been added. The subsoil
is strongly acid or very strongly acid. The hazard of
erosion is severe in bare, unprotected areas.
-Areas of Urban land are1covered with buildings,
streets, driveways, parking I tots, and runways.
Included in mapping are :small areas of Appling,
Gaston, Helena, and Tatum soils. The Appling soils are
I less eroded and are on the;smoother parts of the
landscape. The Gaston soil.s are dominant around
I
1,s Soil Survey
I .. ,, .. ,.
•·,.
I '
I -.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure 7.-Cecil soil is well suited to building site development. This development is in an area of Cecil~Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent I slopes.
I ~lount Holly and Belmont. The Helena soils are along
intermittent drainageways and are moderately well
drained and slowly permeable. The Tatum soils are
11 dominant around Bessemer City and Kings Mountain.
II Also included are small cut and fill areas where the
natural soils have been altered or covered and the
W slope modified. These areas are commonly adjacent to
II the Urban land. The inclusions make up 1 O to 25
percent of this map unit.
There are no major limitations for building site
D development and recreational development: however,
onsite investigation is needed before planning the use
and management of specific sites (fig 7). The l1azard of D erosion is severe where vcgctc1tion is removed at
construction sites, and erosion control practices are
needed. Moderate permeability is a limitation for septic
tank absorption fields. '
This Cecil-Urban land complex has not been
assigned a capability subc'lass nor a woodland
ordination symbol.
CID-Cecil-Urban land :complex, 8 to 15 percent
slopes. This map unit consists of intermingled areas of
Cecil soil and Urban land. ~ecil soil is well drained. It is
on narrow ridges and side slopes mostly in and around
Gastonia. Cherryville, Dallas. and Stanley. Cecil soil
makes up 50 to 65 percent• of the map unit, and Urban
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Gaston County, North Carolina
Where this soil is used as pasture, tall fescue and
ladino clover are the main forage plants. Moderately
steep slopes, surface runoff, and a very severe hazard
of erosion are the main limitations. Conservation
practices that reduce runoff and erosion are needed in
cleared areas. This soil is not used as cropland.
Steepness of slope is the main limitation for building
site development, sanitary facilities, and recreational
development. The hazard of erosion is severe where
vegetation is removed at construction sites, and erosion
control practices are needed. Low strength is a
limitation for local roads and streets.
This Gaston soil is in capability subclass Vie. The
woodland ordination symbol is 9R for loblolly pine.
HeB-Helena sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes.
This soil is moderately well drained. It is on smooth
ridges, toe slopes, and along drainageways throughout
the county. The areas are irregular in shape and range
from 5 to 40 acres.
Typically, this soil has a grayish brown sandy loam
surface layer that is about 8 inches thick. The subsoil
extends to a depth of about 39 inches. It is light
yellowish brown sandy clay loam in the upper part. In
the middle part, it is pale brown and strong brown
sandy clay that has light gray mottles, and in the lower
part. it is reddish yellow sandy clay loam that has light
gray mottles. The underlying material to a depth of 60
inches is multicolored saprolite that has a sandy clay
loam texture.
Permeability is slow, and the shrink-swell potential is
high. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of 1.5
to 2.5 feet. Depth to bedrock is more than 5 feet. This
soil is very strongly acid or strongly acid unless lime
has been added. The hazard of erosion is moderate in
bare, unprotected areas.
Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of
Appling, Vance, and Worsham soils. The Appling and
Vance soils, on small knolls and ridgetops, are w,?!!
drained. Trit Apµiing soiis J.re mure perrnea01& 1.han
Helena soil. The Worsham soils, in small depressions
and drainageways, are poorly drained. Also included
are small intermingled areas of soils that are less acid
than Helena soil. Special map symbols indicate small
areas of gravelly or severely eroded soils and large
gullies. The included soils make up 10 to 15 percent of
this map unit.
This Helena soil is used mainly as woodland. The
rest is used mainly as cropland· or pasture.
Where this soil is used as woodland, common trees
are loblolly pine, shortleaf pine, yellow poplar,
sweetgum, southern red oak, northern red oak. black
23
oak, white oak, and hickory. Common understory plants
are flowering dogwood, eastern redcedar, American
holly, red maple, haJ.-t11orn, sassafras, common
greenbrier, blackber/y, and poison ivy. Wetness is the
main limitation for woodland use and management.
' When this soil is wet: logging causes compaction, deep
ruts, poor surface dr~inage, and lower productivity.
Where this soil is cultivated, the major crops are
corn, soybeans, and small grains. Wetness and
susceptibility to erosion are the main limitations. A
drainage system may\ be needed in some areas. The
most common method for drainage is open ditches. Tile
generally is not used.1If the soil is wet when tilled, soil
structure is destroyed:and large clods form, resulting in
ponding and a poor seedbed. Conservation practices
that reduce erosion arid add organic matter are needed.
Tall fescue and ladino ',clover are the main forage plants
where this soil is usedifor hay or pasture.
High shrink-swell po,tential is the main limitation for
dwellings and small commercial buildings. Wetness is
an additional limitation :1or dwellings with basements.
Foundations should be\designed to resist cracking
because the subsoil shrinks and swells during changes
in moisture. The hazard of erosion is moderate where
vegetation is removed ~t construction sites, and erosion
control practices are ne1!'lded. Wetness and the slow
permeability are major limitations for septic tank
absorption fields. Low strength and shrink-swell
potential are the main liinitations for local roads and
I streets. Wetness and slow permeability are the main
limitations for most recreational development.
This Helena soil is in tapability subclass lie. The
woodland ordination syrribol is SW for loblolly pine.
I
I
HuB-Helena-Urban land complex, 1 to 6 percent
slopes. This map unit co:nsists of intermingled areas of
Helena soil and Urban land. Helena soil is moderately
well drained. It is on smooth ridges, toe slopes, and
along drainageways. ThiS map unit is mostly in and
around Gastonia and Cherryville. Helena soils make up
50 to 65 percent of the m~p unit, and Urban land
makes up 25 to 50 percent. The areas are oblong, are
irregular in width, and range from 4 to 20 acres.
Typically, this Helena soil has a grayish brown sandy
loam surface layer that is 8 inches thick. The subsoil
extends to a depth of about 39 inches. It is light
yellowish brown sandy clay loam in the upper part. In
the middle part, it is pale brown and strong brown
' sandy clay that has light g\ay mottles, and in the lower
part, it is reddish yellow sahdy clay loam that has light
gray mottles. The underlying material to a depth of 60
I
14
Inches is multicolored saprolite that has a sandy clay
oam texture.
This Helena soil has a slowly permeable, clayey
l ubsoil. The shrink-swell potential is high. The seasonal
igh water table is within a depth of 1 .5 to 2.5 feet.
epth to bedrock is more than 5 feet. This soil is very
strongly acid or strongly acid unless lime has been
liadded. The hazard of erosion is moderate in bare,
la,nprotected areas.
< Areas of Urban land are covered with buildings,
~
treets, driveways, parking lots, and runways.
Included in mapping are small areas of Appling.and
ance soils on ridges and Worsham soils in
l epressions. Appling and Vance soils are well drained,
nd Worsham soils are poorly drained. Also included
re small cut and fill areas where the natural soils have
been altered or covered and the slope modified. These
•
areas commonly are adjacent to the Urban land. The
inclusions make up 5 to 15 percent of this map unit.
High shrink-swell potential is the main limitation for
lldwellings and small commercial buildings. Wetness is
11an additional limitation for dwellings with basements.
Foundations should be designed to resist cracking
because the subsoil shrinks and swells during changes
lin moisture. Wetness and the slow permeability are
major limitations for septic tank absorption fields. The
hazard of erosion is moderate where vegetation is
0removed at construction sites, and erosion control
l)prac.tices are needed. Wetness and slow permeability
are the main limitations for most recreational
l development. Onsite investigation is needed before
planning the use and management of specific sites.
This Helena-Urban land complex is not assigned a
capability subclass nor a woodland ordination symbol.
I LgB-Lignum siti loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes. This
soil is moderately well drained to somewhat poorly
•
drained. It is on smooth ridges, toe slopes, and along
drainageways. It is in the Kings Mountain belt that
includes Crowders Mountain, Paseur Mountain, and
•
Spencer Mountain. The areas are oblong, are irregular
in width, and range from 4 to 20 acres.
Typically, this soil hns a grayish brown silt loam
surface layer that is about 4 inches thick. The subsoil
•
extends to a depth of about 36 inches. It is pale brown
silty clay loam in the upper part. In the middle part, it is
light yellowish brown clay that has light gray mottles,
l and in the lower part, it is light yellowish brown, light
gray, and strong brown silty clay loam. The underlying
material to a depth of 60 inches is multicolored saprolite
1 that has a gravelly silty clay loam texture.
I
Soil Survey
Permeability is very slow, and the shrink-swell
potential is moderate. Tlie seasonal perched water
table is within a depth ofI 1.0 to 2.5 feet. Depth to
bedrock is more than 60iinches. This soil is very
strongly acid or strongly acid unless lime has been
added. The hazard of erosion is moderate in bare,
unprotected areas. ,
Included with this soil i_n mapping are small areas of
Alamance Variant, Tatum·, and Worsham soils. The
Alamance Variant and Tatum soils are well drained and
more permeable than Lignum soil. They are on small
knolls and ridgetops. The \worsham soils, in small
depressions and drainageways, are poorly drained.
Special map symbols i_ndicate small areas of gravellv,
stony, or severely eroded 'soils and large gullies. Tile
' included soils make up 1 O, to 15 percent of this map
unit.
1
' This Lignum soil is used mainly as woodland. The
rest is used mainly as cropland or pasture.
Where this soil is used as woodland, common trees
are chestnut oak, hickory, sweetgum, white oak, loblolly
pine, Virginia pine, shortleaf pine, southern red oak,
I northern red oak, and yello~ poplar. Common
understory plants are witchhazel, red maple, common
greenbrier, poison ivy, runn'ing cedar, and honeysuckle.
Wetness is the main limitatipn for woodland use and
management. When this soil is wet, logging causes
compaction, deep ruts, poo/I surface drainage, and
lower productivity. \
Where this soil is cultivated, the main crops are corn,
soybeans, and small grains.\ Wetness and susceptibility
to erosion are the main limitations. Tile generally is not
used for drainage. If the soil\is wet when tilled, soil
structure is destroyed and large clods form, resulting in
ponding and a poor seedbed_. Conservation practices
that reduce erosion and add 'organic matter are needed.
Tall fescue and ladino cloverlare the main forage plants
where this soil is used for hay or pasture .
Wetness is the main limitation for building site
development. Because of the\ moderate shrink-swell
potential, foundations should be designed to resist
cracking. The seasonal perch~d water table-and the
slow percolation rate are a prbblem for septic tank
absorption fields. The hazard ~f erosion is severe
I where vegetation is removed at construction sites, and
erosion control practices are n,eeded. Low strength is a
limitation for local roads and streets. Wetness and slow
permeability are tl1e main limitations for most
recreational development.
This Lignum soil is in capability subclass lie. Tl1e
woodland ordination symbol is ',7w for loblolly pine.
l ' ' (
!
!1 I
I
I
I
I
,1
I
1•
ti
r
!U I
!u
ii
!1
ti
t
' fl
Gaston County, North Carolina
clayey subsoil than the Pacolet soil. Madison soils have
a high mica content, and Wedowee soils are more
yellow and have a moderate shrink-swell potential. In
places, mostly in hardwood forests, are some areas of
slightly eroded Pacolet soils that have a sandy loam
surface layer. Special map symbols indicate small areas
of gravelly or stony soils and large gullies. The included
soils make up 10 to 20 percent of this map unit.
This Pacolet soil is used mainly as woodland. The
rest is used as cropland or pasture.
Where this soil is used as woodland, common trees
are loblolly pine, shortleaf pine, Virginia pine, northern
red oak, white oak, southern red oak, yellow poplar,
sweetgum, and hickory. Common understory plants are
flowering dogwood, sourwood, American holly, black
cherry, black locust, sumac, eastern redcedar, and red
maple. The eroded condition of the soil is the main
limitation for woodland use and management.
In areas where this soil is cultivated, the main crops
are corn, soybeans, and small grains. Steepness of
slope, surface runoff, and susceptibility to erosion are
the main limitations. Good tilth is difficult to maintain
because of the sandy clay loam surface layer. As this
layer dries after a hard rain, a crust commonly forms,
and clods form if the soil is worked when wet. This
limitation causes difficulties in seedbed preparation and
can affect germination, resulting in poor or uneven crop
growth. Conservation practices that reduce erosion and
add organic matter are needed. Tall fescue and ladino
clover are the main forage plants where this soil is used
for pasture.
Steepness of slope is the main limitation for building
site development. Steepness of slope and moderate
permeability are the main limitations for septic tank
absorption fields. The hazard of erosion is severe
where vegetation is removed at construction sites, and
erosion control practices are needed. Low strength is a
limitation for local roads and streets. Steepness of slope
is the main limitation for most recreational development.
This Pacolet soil is in capability subclass IVe. The
woodland ordination symbol is 6C for loblolly pine.
PaE-Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes.
This soil is well drained. It is on side slopes and narrow
ridges throughout the county. Some of the larger areas
are around High Shoals, north of Stanley, and in the
southeastern part of the county. The areas are oblong,
are irregular in width, and range from 5 to 50 acres.
Typically, this soil has a brown sandy loam surface
layer that is about 5 inches thick. The subsoil extends
to a depth of about 39 inches. It is red clay loam in the
upper part. red clay in the middle part, and red clay
loam in the lower part. The underlying material to a
depth of 60 inches lis multicolored saprolite that has a
loam texture. ' ' Permeability is moderate, and the shrink-swell
27
potential is low. The water table is not within a depth of
6 feet. Depth to bedrock is more than 5 feet. This soil
ranges from mediuril acid to very strongly acid unless
lime has been adde'd. The hazard of erosion is very
severe in bare, unprotected areas.
Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of
Madison soils. Thes1e soils have a high content of mica
and occur at random within the map unit. In places are
some moderately eroded areas of Pacolet soils that
have a sandy clay loam surface layer. Special map
symbols indicate small areas of gravelly, stony, or
severely eroded soil~, rock outcrops, and large gullies.
The inclusions make, up 1 0 to 15 percent of this map
unit. 1
This Pacolet soil is used mainly as woodland. The
rest is used mainly a's pasture.
Where this soil is ~sed as woodland, common trees
are loblolly pine, shoitleaf pine, Virginia pine, yellow
poplar, southern red oak, northern red oak, and hickory.
Common understory plants are flowering dogwood,
American holly, eastern redcedar, sourwood, and ·
I ' mountain laurel. Steepness of slope and the hazard of
erosion are the main limitations for woodland use and
management.
This soil generally is not used as cropland. The
moderately steep slop,es, surface runoff, and
susceptibility to erosio'n are the main limitations.
Conservation practicek that reduce erosion and add
organic matter are needed. Tall fescue and ladino
clover are the main forage plants where this soil is used
for pasture. '
Steepness of slope ',is the major limitation for building
site development, sanitary facilities, and recreational
development. The hazard of erosion is very severe
' where vegetation is removed at construction sites, and
. . ' erosion control practices are needed. ·
This Pacolet soil is i~ capability subclass Vie. The
woodland ordination symbol is SR for loblolly pine.
'
PaF-Pacolet sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes.
This soil is well drained,. It is on side slopes and narrow
ridges throughout the county. The areas are oblong, are
irregular in width, and range from 5 to 15 acres.
Typically, this soil has a brown sandy loam surface
layer that is about 5 inches thick. The subsoil extends
to a depth of about 39 inches. It is red clay loam in the
upper part, red clay in the middle part, and red clay
loam in the lower part. i;he underlying material to a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a
D
•
I
I
I
Gaston County. Nortl1 Carolina
VaD-Vance sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes.
This soil is well drained. It is on side slopes and narrow
ridges throughout tl1e county. Some of the larger areas
are southeast of Gastonia and east of Cherryville. The
areas are oblong. are irregular in width, and range from
5 to 30 acres.
Typically, this soil has a brown sandy loam surface
layer that is about 5 inches thick. The subsoil extends
to a depth of about 37 inches. It is yellowish brown clay
in the upper part. strong brown clay in the middle part,
and reddish yellow clay loam in the lower part. The
underlying material to a depth of 60 inches is
multicolored saprolite that has a loam texture.
Permeability is slow, and the shrink-swell potential is
moderate. The water table is not within a depth of 6
feet. Depth to bedrock is more than 6 feet. This soil is
strongly acid or medium acid in the surface layer unless
lime has been added. It is strongly acid or very strongly
acid in the subsoil and underlying material. The hazard
of erosion is severe in bare, unprotected areas.
Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of
Cecil, Pacolet. and Wedowee soils. The Cecil and
Pacolet soils are red and more permeable than the
Vance soil. They are on the ridgetops and the upper
part of the slopes. The Wedowee soils are more
permeable and occur at random within the map unit. In
places are some small intermingled areas of Vance
soils that are moderately eroded and have a sandy clay
loam surface layer. Special map symbols indicate small
areas of gravelly or severely eroded soils and large
gullies. The inclusions make up 1 0 to 20 percent of this
map unit.
This Vance soil is used mainly as woodland. The rest
is used mainly as cropland or pasture. A few small
areas are in urban uses.
Where this soil is used as woodland, common trees
are loblolly pine, shortleaf pine, southern red oak,
northern red oak. white oak, hickory, yellow poplar, and
sweetgum. Common understory plants are flowering
dogwood, sourwood, American holly, eastern redcedar,
common greenbrier, and sassafras. There are no major
limitations for woodland use and management.
Where this soil is cultivated, the major crops are
corn. soybeans. and small grains. Steepness of slope,
surface runoff. and susceptibility to erosion are the main
limitations. Conservation practices that reduce erosion
and add organic matter are needed. Tall fescue and
ladino clover are the main forage plants where this soil
is used for hay and pasture.
Slow permeability and moderate shrink-swell
potential are the main limitations for dwellings.
Steepness of slope is a limitation for small commercial
33
buildings. Foundations should be designed to resist
cracking because tre subsoil shrinks and swells during
changes in moisture. The hazard of erosion is severe
' where vegetation is removed at construction sites. and
erosion control practices are needed. Slow permeability
is the main limitation for septic tank absorption fields.
Low strength is the •main limitation for local roads and
streets. Slope is the main limitation for recreational
development.
This Vance soil is in capability subclass IVe. The
woodland ordination symbol is 7 A for loblolly pine.
I
WeD-Wedowee•sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent
slopes. This soil is :Veil drained. It is on side slopes and
narrow ridges throughout the county. Some of the larger
areas are southeast\of Gastonia and east of Cherryville.
The areas are oblong, are irregular in width, and range
from 4 to 40 acres. ;
Typically, this soil• has a grayish brown sandy loam
surface layer that is 'about 2 inches thick. The
subsurface layer to ~ depth of about 7 inches is
brownish yellow sandy loam. The subsoil extends to a
depth of about 31 inches. It is brownish yellow sandy
clay loam in the upper part, strong brown sandy clay in
the middle part. and ~trong brown sandy clay loam in
the lower part. The u'nderlying material to a depth of 62
inches is multicolored saprolite that has a sandy clay
loam texture. 1
Permeability and the shrink-swell potential are
moderate. The watedtable is not within a depth of 6
feet. Depth to bedrock is more than 5 feet. This soil is
strongly acid or very /;trongly acid unless lime has been
added. The hazard of, erosion is severe in bare,
I
unprotected areas. 1
Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of
Cecil, Helena, Pacolet, and Vance soils. The Pacolet
and Cecil soils are reb and are on ridgetops. The
Helena soils, along intermittent drainageways, are
slowly permeable and' moderately well drained. The
Vance soils, on toe sl6pes. are slowly permeable. Some
intermingled areas of soils east of Cherryville have a
high content of mica. 1:n places are some areas of
Wedowee soils that ar~ moderately eroded and have a
sandy clay loam surface layer. Special map s;•mbols
indicate small areas of very gravelly, stony, or severely
eroded soils and largeIgullies. The included soils make
up 10 to 20 percent of•this map unit.
This Wedowee soil is used mainly as woodland. The
rest is used as cropland or pasture.
Where this soil is us'_ed as woodland, common trees
are loblolly pine, shortleaf pine, Virginia pine, northern
red oak, post oak, southern red oak, white oak, yellow
I
'
oplar, sweetgum, and hickory. Common understory
lants are flowering dogwood, sourwood, American
oily, eastern redcedar, red maple, running cedar, and
loison ivy. There are no major limitations for woodland
se and management. .
Where this soil is cultivated, the main crops are corn,
soybeans, and small grains. Steepness of slope,
1urface runoff, and susceptibility to erosion are the main
la17itations. Conservation practices that reduce· erosion
and add organic.matter are needed. Tall fescue and
f dino clover are the main forage plants where this soil
used for hay or pasture.
Steepness of slope is the main limitation for
dwellings and small commercial buildings. Shrink-swell
l otential is an additional limitation for dwellings with
asements. Moderate permeability and steepness of
slope are the main limitations for septic tank absorption
lelds. The hazard of erosion is severe where vegetation
removed at construction sites, and erosion control
practices are needed. Steepness of slope, shrink-swell
(
tential and low strength are limitations for local
reels and roads. Slope is the main limitation for most
creational development.
This Wedowee soil is in capability subclass IVe. The
loodland ordination symbol is BA for loblolly pine.
WkD-Wilkes loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes. This
doil is well drained. It is on broad to narrow ridges and
ide slopes throughout the county. Some of the larger
areas are northwest of Mount Holly. The areas are
dblong, are irregular in width, and range from 5 to 40
cres.
Typically, this soil has a dark yellowish brown loam
surface layer that is about 6 inches thick. The subsoil
llxtends to a depth of about 15 inches. It is strong
llrown clay in the upper part and strong brown sandy
clay loam in the lower part. The underlying material to a
l"epth of 60 inches is multicolored weathered diorite
edrock that can be dug with difficulty with a spade.
anganese concretions and black streaks range from
few to common. I Permeability is moderately slow, and the shrink-swell
otential is moderate. The water table is not within a
depth of 6 feet. Depth to weathered bedrock is 10 to 20
11ches. Depth to hard bedrock is more than 40 inches.
his soil is strongly acid to slightly acid in the upper
part of the profile and slightly acid to mildly alkaline in
l'he lower part. The l1azard of erosion is severe in bare,
nprotected areas.
Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of
Gaston and Winnsboro soils. The Gaston soils, on
· ·dgetops and the upper parts of the slopes, are red and
I
Soil Survey
more permeable and deeper to bedrock than Wilkes
' soil. The Winnsboro soils are deeper than the Wilkes
soil and occur at random within the map unit. In places
are some small areas of rilkes soils that are
moderately eroded and have a clay loam surface layer.
Special map symbols ind\cate small areas of gravelly,
stony, or severely eroded soils, rock outcrops, and large
gullies. The inclusions m~ke up 10 to 25 percent of this
map unit. 1
This Wilkes soil is used mainly as woodland. The rest
is used as cropland or pasture.
Where this soil is used :as woodland, common trees
are loblolly pine, Virginia pine, shortleaf pine, white oak,
. ' post oak, hickory, yellow poplar, and southern red oak.
Common understory plant~ are flowering dogwood,
eastern redcedar, American holly, sourwood, and
common greenbrier. There: are no major limitations for
woodland use and management. ' Where this soil is cultivated, the main crops are corn,
soybeans, and small grains. Steepness of slope,
surface runoff, restricted ro'oting depth, and the hazard
of erosion are the main limitations. Conservation
practices that reduce erosion and add organic matter
are needed. Tall fescue anc) ladino clover are the main
forage plants where this soil is used for hay or pasture.
' The moderate shrink-swell potential, shallow depth to
weathered bedrock, and ste1epness of slope are the
major limitations for dwellings without basements and
local roads and streets. Depth to bedrock is the main
limitation for dwellings with basements, septic tank
absorption fields, and recreational development.
Steepness of slope is the main limitation for small
commercial buildings. The hazard of erosion is severe
where vegetation is removed at construction sites, and
erosion control practices are \needed.
This Wilkes soil is in capability subclass Vie. The
woodland ordination symbol i·~ 70 for loblolly pine.
WkF-Wilkes loam, 15 to '30 percent slopes. This
soil is well drained. It is on side slopes and narrow
ridgelops throughout the county. Some of the larger
I areas are northwest of Mount,Holly. Areas are oblong,
are irregular in width, and are:5 to 40 acres in size.
Typically, this soil has a dark yellowish brown loam
surface layer that is about 6 i~ches thick. The subsoil
extends to a depth of about 15 inches. It is strong ' brown clay in the upper part and strong brown sandy ' clay loam in the lower part. The underlying material to a
depth of 60 inches is multicolored, weathered diorite
that can be dug with difficulty 0ith a spade. Manganese
concretions and black streaks range from few to
common.
I
I
I
I I
~ I
I
I I
□ I
u I ' I
I
I
I I I
I
I
I
I I I
I I
I
I I
REFERENCE 12 I
g
D
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
~I
POPULATION WITHIN 4 MILES OF THE DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE
DISTANCE FROM
SITE (MILES)
ON-SITE
0 -1/4
1/4 -1/2
1/2 -1
I -2
2-3
3-4
TOTAL:
Prepared by: Cbri!l.opber Huff
Grecnbor~ & O'Mira
Raleigh, Nonb Cirolim -------~
USING GROUNDWATER AS DRINKING WATER SOURCE
GASTONIA, NORTH CAROLINA
NCO 986 175 644
POPULATION DENSITY, PEOPLE PER SQUARE MILE
GASTON COUNTY: 491 GASTONIA CITY: 1070
AREA IN SQUARE MILES POPULATION
GASTON COUNTY GASTONIA CITY GASTON COUNTY GASTONIA CITY
0.03 0.00 14 0
0.30 0.00 147 0
0.48 0.00 235 0
1.53 0.06 751 64
5.10 0.00 2,504 0
11.14 0.20 5,469 214
14.43 0.22 7,085 235
33.01 0.48 16,205 513
CUMULATIVE
TOTAL
14
161
396
1,211
3,715
9,398
16 718
16,718
-Date: Z0=Feb-92 -
i
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I ~ I
I
~
g
a
u
u I
I
I ~ I i
REFERENCE 13 \ I \
I
I
m
I
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
(
SITE DISCDVERY FDRM
'
Part I: Infonnation necessary to add a site to CERCLIS
ACITOO: A
EPA ID: NCD 'IBA
SITE NAME: Davis Park Road TCE Site
S'lllEEI': 2307 Davis Park Road
CITY: Gastonia
CNIY NAME: Gaston
SOORCE: T (R=EPA, T=STATE)
o::NG Disr: 10
ZIP: 28052
CNIY CDDE: 36
(optional)
'
I.A'ITlUDE: 35113 Y5 6" IOOGI'lUDE:81 ° /13/08"
(optional)
!
(optional)
I
i
INVENIDRY IND: Y REMEDIAL IND: Y REMJVAL IND: N FED FAC IND: N
!
RFM NAME: RFM m:NE: (EPA Pi:oject Officer).
SITE DESCfilPI'IOO: {optional)
Three private wells and one cannunity water supply well (,Cedar oak Park Subdivision)
along Davis Park Road in Gastonia, NC are contaminated with trichloroethylene at levels
exceeding the 5 ug/1 MCL. The highest level measured was 101:4, ug /1 TCE at .the May
resiaence. Private well users have been advised to discontinJe drinking and cooking
with this water. Currently, they are purchasing bottled water for these uses. The
Cedar Qak Park Subdivision, which includes 33 homes, has switthed over to an auxiliary
uncontaminated well at the subdivision. However, this is a lbw-yield well and there
is concern cs"oout maintait,:\ng sufficient supply to residents. currently, no alternate
water source is available short of extending a city water lin~ fran Gastonia. It is
estimated that over 3,000 residents within 3 miles are depende1nt on groundwater for
water supply.
Part 2: other site infonnation
I Dl',TE STI'E FIRST
I
I
I
REroRTED: 5 / l/ 90
HFASal HlR LISJ.'ING:
REIDRrED BY: Ms. Sharon Moss, Congressman cass Ballenger' s
Office.
The source of the TCE contamination at these wells has not been detennined,
although Mo:ire' s Transmission Shop on Davis Park Road has been; identified as a
possible sow:ce. We would like to begin pre-remedial investigation of the site
to detennine the source of the contamination. '
,
~
[J
[I
IJ
tl
ff]
' ' ' 0
I
I
01
I
I
I
, I
I
i I I I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I I
I
' I
I
' I
' I
I
REFERENCE 14 \
' I
'
.............. ~,
/ ,,.STATE,~ ,· ' ···•···· ,..,~ .
U•,i " j "-'""f~ " ~I "a{~i_'.,. _ (;'. .:5 . '-<'.'." . ~ ':, : I; I~
~
.,,;'. ff,
.!) ·-~ .,,,;::::·-::.--· . ... __...... ..
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 · Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
• James G. Martin, Governor
p William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Mr. [Dug lair
June 27, 1990
Emergency Response and Removal Branch
us Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street, NE
Atlanta, GA 30365
RE: Davis Park Road 'ICE Site
Gastonia, Gaston County, North Carolina
NCD TM
Dear Mr. Lair:
'
As we discussed today, I am forwarding to : [Dn Rigger
:infonration regarding the trichloroethylene ('ICE) cpntamination
which has been detecte::l. in drinking water wells alorg-Davis.Park
Road in Gaston county, North Carolina. ·-
To date, approximately 20 wells have been sampled. 'Ihree
private wells have shCMn 'ICE levels exceedin3' the 15 ug/1 MCL.
The highest level thus far detected has been 101. 4 , ug/1 'ICE at
the May residence. Residents with levels excee'lirgl 5 ug/1 have
been advised to discont:inue use of the water for drinking and
cookin3' and to avoid prolonged sh=erina'. 'Ibey are currently
buyin3' bottled water for drinking and cookin3'. One =rnmunity
well at the Cedar Oak Park Subdivision has a1sb shCMn TCE
contamination. Levels as high as 34. 9 ug/1 TCE have been
documented. 'Ihis =rnmunity, which includes 33/ homes, is
=ently usin3' an auxiliary well at the subdivision which has
been tested and sh= to be unaffected. H=ever, this well has a
l= yield (-12 gpm) and there is concern that'. it will be
insufficient to supply the entire subdivision throughout the
S\.lI11I1\er. These residents have been advised to ' take water
conservation measures.
eun-ently, the source of the 'ICE contamination ihas not been
determined; h=ever, Moore's Transmission shop, :immediately
adjoining one of the contaminated wells, is beina' eyaluated as a
possible source. 'Ihe North Carolina Superfund section is in the
process of requestin3" that this site be added to CERCLIS so that
we may begin pre-reroc:dial investigation of the site'. We will be
identifyin3' the source of 'ICE contamination for cons1ideration for
William L. Meyer
Director
ii
II
II
II
II
fl
rJ
II
al
' rJ
-
' I
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. l))Ug I.air
6-27-90
Page 2
a future rerroval action. In the meant:i.rre, the Gaston County
Health Cepart:ment is ~ling additional wells a.rd/ has resampled
the May residence an:l Cedar oak Park Sulxlivi,;ion wells to
document any change in the TCE levels. City water lines from
Gastonia cu=ently serve some homes east of Davis Park Road.
'lbe nearest 1211 line erds on Hudson Blvd. at Hartford Drive.
Water line extfmsion would be necessary to h'ook up private
residences with TCE contaminated wells along with residents of
the sulxli.vision whose well has been contaminated:
rue to contamination of the aforementioned wells, a.rd the
I
lack of an alternate penranent water supply, we request that you
consider this site for immediate remaval action consisting of
extending the city water lines from Gaston.fa to the private
residences contaminated with TCE. If we can assist in supplying
any additional information regarding this site please contact Lee
Crosby or me at (919} 733-2801. ,'
Sincerely,
I
~~~
Pat D=Rosa, Head ,
CERCIA Branch
Superfund Section
PD/ds/1&2
cc: Kelly cain
Don Rigger (Attachments)
I
~
i~
1□
,JI
II
--
' ' ' -~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
j
I
I
I ' I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
REFERENCE 15
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II ..
-II
II ..
II
LI
' ' ' -I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r----------------------Gree11/10~11e & O'Jifara, Inc .
RECORD OF PHONE CONVERSATION
DATE: February 6, 1992
INCOMING/OUTGOING (circle one)
TIME: 3:15 pm
PHONE NUMBE~: [phone]
I
G&O REP: Christopher Huff, Environmental Engineer
I . TALKED WITH: Ms. Chris DeRoller, NCDHNR, Mooresville Office
G&O JOB REFERENCE: Site Investigation, Davis Park Road TCE Site,
Gastonia, North Carolina NCO 986 175 644
SUBJECT: Additional Information Regarding Moore' s'.Transmission Shop
Asked Chris DeRoller if the USTs were removed from Moore's
Transmission Shop. She stated that they were and that there was
no contamination from the USTs. She also stated that DEM took a
soil sample from behind the shop where a drain pipe was found. The
results of the soil sample reviled TCE concentration of 700 ppb and
DEC of 2,000 ppb. Possible source of the ground water
contamination. Chris also stated that when She111 Oil built the
station they tries to install a holding tank for the drain line
but when they started to dig they hit bedrock at\depth of 2 feet,
so they left the pipe open to drain onto the ground. The question
of which direction the TCE plume· was traveling. 1 Chris answered
that there are actually two plumes, a TCE and a gasoline. The TCE
plume is traveling southeast and the gasoline is heading southwest.
Also, the gasoline plume is from another site ne'ar by. She Also . I thinks that there are two sources of TCE because as samples were
collected and analyzed the concentration of seetil to drop off by
Skyland Drive and pick up towards the Cedar Oak1Park well. She
will send a map showing the locations of all s~mples taken and
sample type.
G&O Representative Signature and Date:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '
I
g
I REFERENCE 16
I
a
I -
g
I
I
I
D
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
To: File
From: Ed Wallingford, NC Superfund Section
Re: Davis Park Road TCE Site, Gastonia, NC
...
f( ~---~ _2\ • ~ :....::__
On 11 July 1990, Mark Durway and I visited Moore's
Transmission shop located at 2307 Davis Park•Road in Gastonia,
NC. The shop was investigated as a possible source of
contamination of two drinking water wells in the Davis Park
Road area. We were accompanied by Chuck cannon, a Sanitarian
with the Gaston County Health Dept. We met with Roy Moore,
owner of the shop, who provided the following information:
the site is owned by Carl Bell of Gastonia (704/864-6681)
Mr. Bell has leased the property since 1979 or 1980, to Mr.
Moore who runs a transmission rebuild and repair business
waste transmission fluid and oil are containerized in
55-gallon metal drums and stored on asphalt -in the front part
of the property
-the waste transmission fluid and oil are burned for heat in
the winter
the transmission casings are cleaned with a caustic
solution; the transmission parts are cleaned in kerosene
-the property was previously used as an automobile service
station; petroleum storage tanks remain in ground and are owned
by Shell Oil/Acme Petroleum Co. I
the property receives water and sewer service from the
Gastonia Water and Sewer System
Mr. Moore allowed photographs to be taken and indicated
the he would be receptive to other questions,:however, he said
that Mr. Bell should be contacted to information concerning the
history of the property.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
REFERENCE 1 ~
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
February 18, 1991
To: Davis Park Road TCE Site File
From: Bruce Nicholson
Subj: Telecon with Roy Moore, Operator of
Transmissions and Aotu Repair, 230'7
Gastonia, NC 28052, [phone]. '.
Moore's Automatic
Davis Park Road,
I spoke with Mr. Roy Moore, who provided the following
information about the site: '
He is the operator of the site and Mr. Ca~l Bell is the site
owner. Mr. Bell can be reached through his son Douglas Bell
in Charlotte. He did not know Douglas Bell's phone number
[Afterwards, I called information and found that Douglas
Bell's phone number is unlisted. DEM 1 i's ts his address as
2916 Burnt Mill Road, Charlotte, NC 28210-6100].
I
Mr. Moore has operated his shop on site: since about 1980.
Prior to that it was a service station of, some kind, but he
did not have any operational details.
' Mr. Moore knows Don Rigger who visited th~ site to sample a
waste oil tank. However, Don could not flnd the tank where
Mr. Moore said it was located. When they talked to Carl Bell
he siad that he had pulled that tank years ago.
I
However, Mr. Bell currently has contractors on site who are
pulling two other tanks. One tank reportedly has 5 to 7
inches of product and the other has 3 ~o 4 inches. The
product has a paint thinner-like odor. 1 [I called Chris
DeRoller at DEM-Mooresville to notify her,of this. DEM has
issued Mr. Bell an NOV, but Mr. Bell had no.t told them he was
excavating any tanks. She said she would1 try to visit the
site and take some samples tomorrow.]
Mr. Moore also told me about a possible suspected source. He
said that for as long as he could remembe~ there had been a
tanker truck that was parked in a Church Parking Lot about a
• ' • I • 1/4-mile south of his shop on Davis Park Road. The truck was
from an unknown chemical company in Charlotte. He also said
that the parking lot shows damage he s,ays is from the
chemicals from the truck. He said that the truck is no longer
there and that it disappeared when the news came out about the
ground water contamination. [ I asked Chris DeRoller about this
and she said that Mr. Moore had told her tllis and that other
sources confirm it. She said she thought that Don Rigger may
have taken a sample in the parking lot. DEM:has looked at the
parking lot, and the pavement did look cracked, but it could
have been from the weight of the truck rath~r than a chemical
spill. J
bin/tel/davisl
~
~
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I ' I
REFERENCE 18 :
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6 August 1990
To: File
From: Ed Wallingford, NC Superfund Section
Re: Telecon with Carl Bell, owner of Moore's Transmission shop
property
Mr. Bell provided the following information concerning the
history of the Moore's Transmission shop property:
I
-He bought the buildings and property approximately 30 years
ago from Mr. John Birch of Gastonia, NC. '
-He operated a service station until about ten years ago, but
the station was only used for pumping gasoline. The property
was also used as a service station under Mr. ,Birch's ownership.
-The USTs at the
given to Mr. Bell
site were used for petroleum storage
by Acme Petroleum of Gastonia.
Water and Sewer service lines
establishment approximately 15 y_ears
were
ago.
I connected
and were
to the
-Water was previously obtained from a well located on property
to the south of the transmission shop. The well is located on
the south side of the adjacent residence.
-There has never been a septic tank on the property; Mr. Bell
is not sure if there is a drainfield.
I I I
I
I I
I
I I ' I
I
~
I
I
I
~
I
I I
I
REFERENCE 19
I I
I I
I
I I
I
I I I ' I
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..... ~ f,":,c;-·~
f:_!i13i:1}.ri,·:· :-__ ~\ 1:s ,::~ -... '"/ .::i :::, ; ' f?,
~
.Ll-~ .-.... : .. ,, .. ,· ::.:..~::··
State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Solid Waste Managemen~ P.O. Box 27687 · Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-.7687
I James G. Marlin, Governor
William W, Cobey, Jr., Secretary
22 January 1991
William L. Meyer
Director
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Barbara Christian
Groundwater Section . Division of Environmental Management
Mooresville Regional Office
Post Office Box 950
Mooresville, NC 28115
Courier 13-21-07
RE: Davis Park Road
Gastonia, Gaston County
Dear Barbara:
Enclosed is the completed Division of Environmental Management review of potential sites form for the Davis Park Road site in Gastonia. The site is being evaluated by the Federal Superfund Program. The fact that the site qualifies as ~ Federal Superfund site does not preclude the Division of Environmental Management from.having involvement · with the site.
If you have any questions or can provide additional information on the site, please contact Pat DeRosa or me at [phone].
LC/acr
Enclosure
Sincerely,
~ Ul,o1:,\o'
~e Crosby, Chief G'
Superfund Section
.-
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
DIVISICN OF ENVIR(N,)ENI'AL MANAGEMENI'
I
MENJRANDUM 'ID: Jerry Rhodes
Lee Crosby
Hazardous Waste Section state Superfund Section'
Solid Waste Section
FRCT'I:
J. Gordon Layton
Groundwater Section
M:x:>resville Regional Office
I
I SUBJEXcl': Review of Potential Superfund, RCRA, or Solid Waste Sites
Please review the following site listed belo.,i, check one of the boxes, and return a signed xerox ccpy.to this Office.
'Ihis site qualifies
Section will be the
' as a Federal Superfund site, and the State lead agency. '
'Ihis site qualifies as a State Superfund site, and the State Superfund Section will be the lead agency.
I 'l'his site qualifies as a R~ site, and the Hazardous waste Section will be the lead agency.
'Ihis site qualifies as a closed or active sclid waste management facility and the Solid Waste Section will be the lead agency.
'l'he Division of Solid Waste Management will take this'site under study to detennine if any Section will be the lead agency and i'.iill resp:md in writing to Groundwater M:x:>resville Regional Office irrrnediately upon making the determination.
' 'l'he site listed does not cane under our jurisdiction and is being refe:rred back to the M:x:>resville Regional Office Growidwater Section for investigation,··
signed ~ C.11 n i-:,6
Site to be reviewed: ~'tJ
Superfund Contact:
Pat DeRosa Name:
L::x::ation:
I
MRO Contact: Cl-ct":s :::u,. .41 // e r:
Contamination: ::ref
X 113.terial Attached
Should you have any questions, please ccntact this Office at [phone].
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:>Y.,·
* MN
J1GN
.. ·--Q·O(j· -1-1 MILS . .' ...
2 MILS
PG, 'I r, Q(Y~ /l [ :; t-! '...
\ UNITE STATES G/'~TONJA SOUTH, N. C.-S. C.
'
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
1000
CONTOUR INTEHVAL 10 FEET
NW/', CLOVER !5' QUADRANGLE
N3507.5-W8 !07.5/7.5
1973
I MtiT•'"'l~•a• r:rr,,-.,,-.,.,,-, ,,,.,..,.,..,,..., ,.,,,-,.,. r-,· '"C"
I I .
I I !
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I REFERENCE 20
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
/,'~ $TAT(0 .• ....,a,t'..J"'"'• ~A'
;!ii~' Jrfll_/l,,. ~ .:s . . .. +'.;,, '5 ·;, \ ... R ·,,~, Ji··._;., ..•.
.,,,, </(;AA'.,.>•'
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Naturfl Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 · Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
I James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
27 Jillie 1990
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Kelly cain
NC CERCIA Project Officer
EPA Region IV waste Division
345 Courtland Street, NE
Atlanta, GA 30365
SUbject: CERCLIS Site Addition
Davis Park Road TCE Site
Gastonia, NC 28052
Dear Ms. cain:
Please add the subJ'ect site to CERCLIS. Prel' ' data ~
has established the folla,dng al::out the site:
1. 'Ihree private wells and one community water. supply well
(Cedar oak Park SUbdivision) along cavis Park Road in
Gastonia, NC have shCM11 trichloroethylene (TCE)
contamination with levels exceeding the 5 ug/1 MCL.
The highest TCE level reported to date is 101.4 ug/1 at
the May residence.
2. The source of the contamination has not been
3.
' ' ' detennined; however, Moore's Transmission Shop,
immediately adjoining one of the contaminated wells,
has been identified as a possible source. :'.lnis shop is
located at 2307 Davis Park Road, Gastonia, North
Carolina 28052 . Gastonia is in Gaston County. The
cooroinates of this shop are latitude 35° 13' 56",
longitude 81 ° 13' 08".
It is estimated that over 3,000 people within 3 miles
of this site use groundwater for their dr,inking water
supply.
4. Currently, private well users with affected wells have
been advised to discontinue use of their water for
drinking and cooking. They are purchasing bottled
water for these purposes. The subdivision has switched
to an auxiliary well which has thus fkr shCM11 no
contamination. This well has a low yield (-12 gpm)
William L. Meyer
Director
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Kelly cain
6-27-90
Page 2
'
hc:Mever, and is not expecte:i to provide sufficient
supply to these homes permanently. city; water from
Gastonia is not available to the affected residents and
would require water line extension prior to ih=kup.
'Ihe North carolina SUperfun:1 Section has forwarded this
infornation to Doug I.air, Emergency Response and Rerroval Branch,
requesting that he evaluate the site for immediate action. A
copy of this request is attached. I have also attached a CERCIJ:S
site addition sheet. If you J:iave any questions, please call Pat
DeRosa or ire at [phone].
LC/PD/ds/5
Attachments
== Pat DeRosa
I.Dis Walker
. Ann Rudd
Sincerely,
0L.o ):;,, ~ i-
Lee Crosby, Chlef C:i
SUperfun:1 Section
Solid Waste Management Division
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I i
REFERENCE 211 I I :
I
'
I
I
I
I
~
~
a
a
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
19 June 1990
MEMORANDUM
TO: File
FILE: Pat DeRosa, Head ~
CERCLA Branch
RE: TCE Well Contamination
Cedar Oak Park Subdivision
Gastonia, Gaston County, NC
I contacted the following individuals today regarding the subject site:
1.
2.
Barbara Christian, DEM, Mooresville, (704 )-663-1699
She said that Ms. Chris DeRoller, DEM -Mooresville, Groundwater Section
had sampled soil at the transmission shop. Surface sqil taken from a stained
area showed 1,300 ppm of a "late eluting'' chemical. The sample collected at
18" showed no VOCs or BNA's. DEM is planning ~o do more work at the
site to identify the source of groundwater contamination. Chris DeRoller is
the primary contact.
Boyce Hunt, Gaston County Health Department, (704)-853-5200
I
He said that to date the primary community well at Cedar Oak Park
Subdivision has been sampled twice (March, April 1990) and has shown TCE
contamination both times. The secondary well at the spbdivision was sampled
once and has not shown contamination. This well is currently being used by
the 33 connections at the subdivision. Mr. Hunt is concerned that this low-
yield well (-13 gpm) will be insufficient to supply rdsidents throughout the
summer. Water conservation has been recommended to residents. In
addition, -12 private wells have been sampled one ti.me each. Three show
TCE > 5 ppb (EPA MCL), others show trace or no contaminants. Residents
with levels 2. 5 ppb TCE have been advised not to drink the water and to
avoid prolonged showering (Ken Rudo has done asses·sment.) Residents are
buying bottled water for drinking and cooking.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
1
TCE Well Contamination
19 June 1990
Page 2
Currently, the nearest water line ends -400 -500 feet north of the entrance to the
subdivision along Davis Park Road. Hook up to· county water would require
extension of this line. In addition, Mr. Hunt explained that the feeder lines to each
home would need to be replaced to meet county water specifications.
Don Rigger, EPA, ERT [phone] has indicated that EPA may be able to act
under immediate removal authority to provide either bottl~d water or pQssibly a
water line extension. However, in order to trigger a !removal action, TCE
contamination must be either 1) 2. 128 ppb EPA action level, or 2) be increasing so
that it appears that the 128 ppb action level may be reached ih the near future. This
requires repeated sampling over time.
Currently, the Gaston County Health Department is plannin~ to sample additional
private wells in the area. I recommended that they resample the subdivision well
which has shown contamination and the private well which li,as shown levels of 101
ppb in an attempt to document any increase in levels. This aqditional sampling may
provide EPA with the information needed to engage the ERT. '
3. Don Rigger, ERT EPA [phone]
Don Rigger was out of the office. I left a message.
PD /jo/memos.pd
I
I
~
~
~
~
□
0
i
D I
I
u •. REFERENCE 22 \
~ .. {
I
I ~ I
'
I
I u I
E
E
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
D
m
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Ms. Pat DeRosa
Chief, Cercla Branch
North Carolina DEHNR
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Ms. DeRosa:
REGION IV
345 COURTLAND STREET. N.E.
ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30365 ,JUL ;;a 1990
July 27, 1990
I have enclosed the results from the Davis Park Road drinking water
samples collected by Phil Henderson on July 6, 1990!and analyzed by
the EPA laboratory in Athens, Georgia. As you can see these results
are somewhat lower than the most recent results reported by the North
Carolina laboratory. Region IV policy requires that the "removal
action level" for a specific compound (128 ppb for trichloroethylene)
be exceeded before this office can contemplate the provision of an
alternate source of drinking water to affected residents. In
addition, the data used to make this determination must be developed
at the EPA laboratory.
Because the levels in both wells are quite elevated:and another
laboratory has reported significantly higher concentrations, this
office will sample these wells on a quarterly basis. The next
scheduled sampling event for these wells will be October 6, 1990. I
encourage you to continue your monitoring of this p~oblem. If you
develop data demonstrating that the concentrations are increasing, we
will re-evaluate our sampling schedule.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at
404/347-3931.
Sincerely, I?!)_~'
Don Rigger,Vs::e Coordinator
Emergency Response and Removal Branch
== ;;;a liiiiil liiiii -

-
---SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMEtJT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
llill iiill -
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ... .. ..
" ..
•••••""**•"-••:e:••••••••"t:•T•••:r:•**
PROJECT NO. 90-725 SAMPLE NO. 48046 SAMPLE TYPE: DRKWATER
SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD. 1
STATION ID: PW02 DAVIS PARK RD. (Mo.':. \<.c'.S' :0-.e"<..cj
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • * • • • • • • • • • • • •
PROG ELEM: SSF
CITY: GASTONIA
COLLECTED BY: P. HENDERSON
COLLECTION START: 07/06/90
SI: NC
1330 STOP: 00/00/00
-07/18/>'"
' . '
··• f •• t-••••• t-t-t-••• St-. t-. t-. 1' t-•• t-. * t-•• t-t-t-•• t-••• t-$. t-$ $ •••• $ t-. t-t-• t-t 1' 9 T
UG/L ANAL \'T!CAL RE SUL TS I.IG/L MlAL YT!CAL RESULTS
zsu
'2':ill
25U
25U
25U
25U
:2:':)0U
250U
25IJ
23U
2S~
't1:,(_11J
3.8J
251J
LSCJU
!''::-I.I
:25U 25U
/.SU
25U
?5U
!iZ
25!..I
25li :su
CHL.OR.OMETi-iANE
VHIYL CHLORIDE
GROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHAtJE
TR!CHLOKOfLUUKOMtlHANE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENE( 1, 1-DlCHLOROfTHYl.fNEJ
AC!:TONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
~.\ETHYLEt~E CHLO~ID[
TRANS-!, 2-Dl CHLOROETHENE ' . "'. ,..,., ,.., .... ,....~ ......... -1 , , U J. VrlLVf\UC I ni-,.NC.
\IHJYL :'\CET:'\TE
CIS-1. 2-D!CHI.OROFTHfNf
') ,;_n T ru, r,,v•,r.r,r,,-, •, ,.-
... , ._ V ...... 11,..Vl'Vf" "vr ,..,,,11. ..
Mt=1HY1 I-Tl-IV!_ ~.E.!01'!!: ""''"''''"'"' ,, ......... ,.,,,--..... ~ u"VlllV\.,llLVl",.Ul'1(: I nl-lNC.
!.'H!..0.~0POP.M
i , i . i -TR 1 CHi_OKlJE. THAM!:
1, 1-DICHLOROrROrENE
1 .. AkBOM Tl:: 1 K.0.1;.HU)RlDE
1 .2-DiCHLOROCTHANE
Bt.~Et~JE
IRiCi-iL0R0ETiiENf:(TRiCHLUKUtfHYLEi'JE.)
1 , 2-!J I CHLOROrRO?AtJE
r11 BROM(IMI:: I HANt.
[3~01,iOU i CHLVRGMETHMJC
ss•FOOTNOTES***
25U -;sou
25U
2':,IJ
25U
25U
25U
250U
251_1
25U 25U
250 25U
25t1
2.5U
25U ·/SU
2SU •>l.;l 1 2su
25lJ ·)Sll
2SU 251_1
CIS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
t.'t IHYL !SOBUTYL Y.ETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1, 3-DICHLORorROP[tJ[
1, 1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TE TRACI ILOROETHCIJ[( TETRACHLOROE rn·,LrnE J
1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE
METHYL BUTYL. isETONE
DI BROMOCHLOROMETHAtJE
CHLORORFN7FMI-'
1 ,1,1,2 TCTRACHLOROEiHANE
tlHYL BENZENE
( M-AtJD/OR P-l XYLENF
0-XVLEtlE
STYR.FNF
D r•u•111,-.c-r,r,' • ..,,.v,uv, v"'"
eKrJMQBEM2'EME
I, 1, 2, 2-TETRACHLOROETHA>IE
1, 2, 3-Tr.ICIILOROrRorAIJ[
(J-CHLOR<J I 01. UENE
P-CHLOROTOL UENE
1 :..1.-1111'1-H nPrn~. i: "' E~!~ 1'.4-DICHLOROBEN ENE
1, 2-DIC~LOROBE~J EtJE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NA!-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDENCE OF PRESCIJCE OF MATER!>\!
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS K,IOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER !S THE MINIMUM QUANTITAT!ON LIMIT.
l!!!!!!=i liiiii liiiiil -

-
---SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA.
iiiil
PIJRGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
..
" ..
PROJECT NO. 90-725 SAMPLE NO. 48045 SAMPLE TYPE: DRKWATER
SOURCE: DAV IS PARK RD. ( )
SiAT!O!J ID: PW01 CEDAR RD. SUBDIVIS10N Co,•-,y,,u.,;fy we//
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED
CITY: GAST(iNIA
COLLECTION START: 07/06/90
iiilil ..
DY: P. HENDERSON
ST: NC
-
1305 STOP: 00/00/00
-07 I 18/UC'
*"'* • • • • * * _. • ._ • • • • * * 't • • • • • 1' • :t , • :t • • * * * * ,._ * • ._ $ IJ * * * • $ • * • 1J • • $ • • • • • • t • • 1" T
UG/L ANAL \'TJCAL RESULTS I_IG/L ANALYTICAL r-E~UL TS
,; r,,' ...,_ vv
5.0ll s.ou 5.0U
5.0U 5.0U =iou sou
t:; (l\\ s:ou s.o:..:
L-../ll I s: OU
5.01..! sou
C no• ..,_ vv
"· !)11
J. OU c OV
~-1·1u
5. OU
~ OU
CHLOROMETHANC
\I !MYL CHLOR !DE
OROMOMETIIANE
CHLOROEHIANE
TRl(HLUKOfLUOKOMtlHANE
1 . 1-D I CHLOROETHENE( 1 . 1-D I CHLOROETHYI_ HIE)
ACElONE CARRON DISULFIOE
:.l~Tl-!'i'LG~E CHLORIDE
TRllNS-1. L-Ul CHLO:-?Ot.THENE ...... ~,.. ... -----~ ..... -
', I V1\.,f1L.Vl"\UL ;ni->.r>IC:
\IHJYL /\CET/\TE
CIS-1. 2-DICHLOROFTHsNE "> ..-,_n T r-u, ,..,...,,..,....,,..,..,.., • ,,,... ~. ~ ,.,..,._,,,,_,..,,,vr1,vrH1~L.
Ml-' l HY! 1-TI-JVL r.E'f0~!t:: n,..,,..,,,,....,.., ,, ,.....,...,.,--... ··-
1.J"V"'VVOLUi;umc l Ml-INC.
r:f-!LO~OFO~M
i , 1 . ·1 -TR i C! lLOROE THANt:
1 .1-DICHLOROPROPENE
(A~BON Ttl~A~HLO~!DE
1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE
B=~!lUJE
ir,, i \,Hi..URL1C THF Ni: l TR! C-HLUKUt THYL ENE)
1. 2-0!CHLOROPRO?MJE
0 i i)R(1M(lMt-: ! HANt
Q~Clr'10D I CHLOis.OMETHANE
5.0U
50U
5.0U
5.01.1 5.0U 12 5.0U sou
'3. QI_I
5.0U
5.0!J
S.Ull
5.0U s.ou 5.VV 5.0U
S (HI
s.ou
LS. QI.I 5.0U
5.011
~-()ti G.OU
s.01_1
CIS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
,_,t I HYL I SOBUTYL KETOflE
TOLUENE
TP.ANS-1 .2-DICHLOROrROrCNC
1 ,1 .2-TRJCHLOROETHANE
TETRACIILOROETl!rn[( TETRACHLOROETHYLENE J
1.3-D!CHLOROPROPANE
METHYL BUTYL ~E TONI'.
DI BRm.!OCHLOROME THAtJE
CHLOROAFMi'fMt-
1, 1, 1 , Z T[TRACHLGROCTHAi-iE
tlHYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-1XYLENF
0-XYLWE
ST"v"KFNF sr.cMOFC~:.~
tH{l_l,.,,08EM2E~lE
1. 1. 2. 2-TETRAf'.HI.OnOE fHA>IE
1, 2, 3-TP.ICHLOROrROf':..IJE
0-CHLOF<Uf(J1 tlENE
P-CHLOROTOLUENE
1 '~-fll r'l--11 flLlnRi::>..17~~1~
1 : 4-ii i ci-iCiifi,=,eENZENE
1, 2-DtCHLOROBEt!ZE:~E
, 1 1 FOOT:JOTES• * *
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAl-JNTERFERENCES •J-EST]MATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE E0IDENCE Of PRESENCE OF MATER!•!.
•K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•Li-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATJON LIMIT.
-
l!l!I == liliiil liiiili --SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION JV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
PIJRGEABLE ORGAHICS DATA REPORT ... .. .. . .
.,.,.,. ••••••• :l;***:a-*•*•"t:l"f,t*:t-*"'***ct.
PROJECT NO. 90-725 SAMPLE NO. 48044 SAMPLE TYPE: TRIP BLANK
SOURCE: DAVIS PARK RD.
STATION ID: TRIP BLANK TB-01
PROG ELEM: SSF
C !TY: GAS TON I A
COLLECTION START:
iiiil iiilil
COLLECTED OY: P. HENDERSOfJ
Sr: NC
-
07/06/90 STOP: 00/00/00
-07 I 18/<:.."1
•~• ••• ' •••••• * •• * •••••••• f f * • * * * • * • ~ •• * •• * • * * • *. *. * * •• * * * •••• ~ • f • '.'
UG/l AIJALYT!CAL RESULTS IJG/L ANAL VT!CAL RESULTS
s.ou
S.Pll s.ou
5.DU s.ou
5.0U
:)OU sou _ _.. 5. OU
5.CJU C: ,...,, ...,_ vv
1-,f)I I s:ou
5.01J s,-iu
S.8~
...... 1111 s:ou
5.0U
~. OU s:ou s nu :.:uu
5,0IJ
5.0U
S.O'J
CHLOROMETHANC
1/IMYL CHLOP.IOE
tlROMOMETHANE
CHLORCETIIAIJ[
TRICHLUKUcLUORUMtlHANE
1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l .1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ
ACETONE
CARRON D!SULElDE
t.~ETHY~EUE C!ILORID[
TRANS-1. £-UICHLIJKOETHENE ' • ,-.,~,-... ,..,~,-.-~ ..... -
' , I V l VI lLVr\UL I ni'-\1\IC.
\IH.1V1 r,ri::TATI=
i;i 5.:.1. 2:0 frHLOROETHENE
0 ,;_nTr-u, r,n,-..,_,...,..,...,.,,,... ._, ._ .., ~ ...,, ,._v,~'-'r "vr Ml~L
Mf= 1 HYI t-Tl-lV~ ~.ET01'!E
n..,,-...,,..,_,..," ,..,~,..,.,-~,. •, •-
w"u,,,uvrlLUt\VrtlC I M>-INC
! ·u1 nPni:-nou
~ ·.-1 ~ ··i'= TR '(tHLOROf T HA!-Jt
1, i ···DlCHLOROf'ROPEIJE
CA.RB(1N .rt I w...f\.<.'.HL'JRIDE
1 . 2·-0 I CHLOROETHANE
BE1'!ZE~!E _
T~ i Crii...01(0f. THtN[ 1 fR I l'HLUKUt J HYLE:.Mt:)
1, 2-DlCHLOROPROPAIJE
i) T ARf1M(1Mt 1 f-ift1'!t
3RO:/iGi) I Ci-li...OR.OMETHANC.
-t-t-tFQOTIJOTES:tH
5.0U 5(J\I
S.OU
t; f''II I s:ou
S,OU
S.OU sou
13. Q1.J
5.0U
5 n11 .v-s.uu
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U 5.CU s ()ti
G.OU
i.:. nu s:ou
5.0U
S till
G.OU
5.01.1
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPEIJE
Mt/HYL JSOBUTYL KETONE
TOLU[NE
TP.MJS-1, 3-DICHLOr.OrROP[IK
1 .1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TErnACI ILORO[TH[IJE( TETRACHLOROE TH'vLENE J
1. 3-DICHLOROPROPANE ..
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
D! BROMOCHLOROMETHAtJE
(.HLOF<OP.fN7FMr
1 .1.~.z TCTRACHLOROEIHANE
t I HYL BENZENE
(M-AND/OR P-lXYLENF
0-XYLENE
ST"YKFNF onn1•nr-,-,,-,,, L.J1 ,vmV1 Vl'I"
t:\~_fJM('BEMl.ENE
1 .1. 2, 2-TETRA(.HLCIROEH-1A_"1E
1, 2. 3-"!"RICHLCRCrRcrAtJ[
0-CHLOF<(!'f t)L l!E NF.
P-CHLOROTOL UENE
1, :j-l_l}f_'.~L0~0!3nL?E~!=
1 ,4-DJCHLOROBENZENE
1 , 2-DICHLOROBENZE?JE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •IJA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTJVE EVIDEIJCE OF PRESEIJCE OE MATEf<; i·.i
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEM
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION L!MJT.
..
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I
I .
I
I
I
I I
REFERENCE 23:
1 I
I
I
I
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
North Carolina Public Water System Maximum Contaminan.t Levels (MCLs) 9/91
INORGANIC CHEMICALS
Primary: Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Fluoride
Lead
Secondary:
· Mercury
Nitrate
Selenium
Silver
Iron
Manganese
Sodium
RADIOLOGICAL CHEMICALS
Gross Alpha
Combined Radium
Gross Beta
Tritium
Strontium 90
Radon
Uraniwn
Radium 226
Radium 228
Strontium 89
Iodine 131
Cesium 134
VOLATILE ORGANIC CHEMICALS
p-Dichlorobenzene
Vinyl chloride
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Trichloroethylene
Benzene
Total trihalomethanes
ORGANICS (PESTICIDES)
Endrin
Lindane
Methoxychlor
'l'oxaphene
2,4-D
2,4,5-TP
MCL (mg/1)
0.05
1.0
0.01
0.05
4.0
0.05
0.002
10.0
0.01
0.05
0.3
0.05
N/A
MCL (pCi/1)
15
5
50
8
20000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
MCL (mg/1)
0.075
0.002
0.007
0.005
0.2
0.005
0.005
0.005
0. 100
MCL (mg/1)
0.0002
0.004
0.1
0.005
0.1
0.01
I I
I
I I I
I
I ' ' I I ' '
I
u
8
E
I
I I
REFERENCE 24 :
I
• g
g
D
m
I
I i
I I
I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11·
I ,-,
1·:
••
1·1
•; ..
May 1, 1990
To: Lee Crosby, Chief
superfund Section
and
site Screening File
From: Bruce Nicholson i1fJ
Subj: TCE Well Contamination
Cedar Oak Park Subdivision
Gastonia, Gaston County, NC
Ms. Sharon Moss of Congressman Ballenger's office notified me
of this site today. She received a call from Ms. Helen Bess
([phone] or [phone]] about a well that supplied 33
houses in Cedar Oak Park Subdivision that is contaminated with
34.9 ppb trichloroethylene (TCE).
I did not reach Ms. Bess but I spoke to Rachel Hill who was
aware of the problem. Based on new community well rules, they
routinely test the wells periodically. The first well sample was
taken on March 31, 1990, by Mr. Grady Russ, a dertified well
operator. The sample was sent to Aquatech Environmental
Consultants for analysis which showed the following:
trichloroethylene
tetrachloroethylene-
chloroform
34.9 ppb
23.7 ppb
9.2 ppb
A second sample was taken on April 17, 19~0, and the results
matched the first sample closely. The subdivi~ion was able to
switch to a backup well located 400 feet from the contaminated
well. This backup well has so far tested negative for
contaminants. However, this well is much· lower, in yield than the
original well, and the subdivision residents have been asked to
conserve water. Ms. Hill said she would send us the complete set
of sample results and a copy of the letter sent to all of the
affected residents.
The Public Water supply Section is aware o~ the problem as
well as the Gaston County Health Department. The Gaston County
Health Department sampled the affected well and several other
surrounding wells in the area on April 27, 199tr, but the results
are not back yet. Boyce Hunt said the potentia_l sources include a
nearby transmission shop, and two shade tree au;to mechanics. He
said the soil at the transmission shop appeared to be contaminated
and discolored black.
The site is located approximately 1.5 miles north of the New
Haven Drive TCE Site and 1.5 miles northwest of the Homelite
Division of Textron Site (I have attached a ma~ of the respective
site locations) .
BIN/mem/toleel9/
cc: Pat DeRosa
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/'\ \ \ ,/
~/
I l«te ctt,,,'j Ck,,,,,c,.ls {lf:_ c)
I 1<--u..L. k Y'dMfr> -1., k.t <&o
I
I
1
jJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
REFERENCE 261
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
u
r------------~---------G rec n /, o rn e & 0 '}.fa ra, Inc.
RECORD OF PHONE CONVERSATION,
DATE: February 10, 1992 TIME: 3:15 pm
INCOMING/OU~GOING PHONE NUMBER: [phone]
G&O REP: Christopher Huff, Environmental Engineer
TALKED WITH: Mr. James Thompson. Gaston County Environmental
Health Division
G&O JOB REFERENCE: Site Investigation, Davis Pkrk Road TCE Site,
Gastonia, North Carolina NCD 986 175 644
SUBJECT: Additional Information Regarding Moore's Transmission
Shop and contaminated well in the area
Received a call from James Thompson of the Gaston County
Environmental Health Division. I asked James lte knows about the
Davis Park Road TCE Site Mr. Thompson answered ~ith the following
information:
1. Of the people living in Gaston County, 53% of them are using
groundwater as primary drinking water source and that there
are over 1,900 wells through the county. '
2.
3.
4 .
There are 10 to 12 community well systems are within a couple
of miles of the site and over 100 wells within 500 feet of the
site.
Analytical test are done every 6 months on contaminated wells
and will supply us with a copy of what he has and a map
showing where the samples were taken
There is no correlation between the three sites located within
' the study area.
G&O Representative Signature and Date:
I
I
I
~
~
~
a
a
E
E REFERENCE 27
E
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
To: superfund Section staff
· ·:.--From: Hal Bryson 11>
Date: August 17, 1992
Ref. 2 7
MEMORANDUM
s~bject: Update on Status of Well Head Protection Programs in N.C.
Carl Bailey of the OEM's Groundwater Section has provided me with the following in~ormation regarding the establishment of Well Head Protection Areas (WHPAs) in North Carolina:
-Currently there are no WHPAs in North Carolina.
-A number of local governments in the state have been funded by EPA ''demonstration grants'' to initiate the development of local Well Head Protection Programs; ho1:ever, the formal designation of WHPAs can not be initiated until the Groundwater Section has a program approved by EPA --such approval would grant authority to the DEM to formally establish WHPAs in local ar~as.
~ Formal approval by EPA of the Groundwater Section's WHPA Program is expected within 12 to 18 months.
-Counties currently attempting to develop local WHPA programs include Bladen, Buncombe, Columbus, Gaston, Lee, Moore, Randolph, Robeson, Scotland, and Stokes.
The Superfund Section should contact Mr. Bailey in another year or so to update this information.
HCB\whpamem
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I REFERENCE 28
~
H
E
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· .... ,-:_;~:>.;-;;.';i,; _Y•li::•:::.],:/i('I.
:;:.'.!·:, :·i':·:i:(: ·: ·· ... : -:i: ·-:··.'
,_ ......... · .... ,. ··, ...... ·,. ' ··'' • ... , .. _ ..... -,,.,, ... :,. .• f.._ ... . --.~~F~ .. -,i..i.;~';;'. ... ~ .... J..:...:.:..:.~::ia.:-.:..:..e::..·;i:.:,;;..:.u.:.-'J;.::J..;....__;.;;_;..;.:..:,,.",;.t~ ... · ... _."'_~ ........ :\:..
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
CITY OF
GASTONIA,
NORTH CAROLINA
GASTON COUNTY
(SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINT~O)
PANEL 15 OF 20
COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER
370100 0015 C
MAP REVISED:
JANUARY 15, 1982
federal emergency management agency
federal insurance administration
I I
\
KEY TO MAP
SOO•Year Flood Boundary-----
100-Year Flood Boundary-----
Zone Designations*
100-Year Flood Boundary-----
500-Year Flood Boundary-----
Base Flood Elevation Line
With Elevation In Feet**
Base Flood Elevation in Feet (EL 987)
Where Uniform Within Zone0
Elevation Reference Mark RM7x
Zone D Boundary---------
River fl.·\ile •Ml.5
-+->rRcfercnccci to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929
*EXPLANATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS
ZONE
A
AO
AH
A1-A30
A99
B
C
D
V
V1-V30
EXPLANATION
Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and
flood hazard factors not determined.
Areas of 100-year shallow flooding where depths
are between one (1) and three (3) feet; average depths
of inundation are shown, but no flood hazard factors
are determined.
Areas of 1 DO-year shallow flooding where depths
are between one {1) and three {3) feet; base flood
elevations are shown, b_ut no_ .flood hazard factors
are det"e"'rmin·ed~.
Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and
flood hazard factors determined.
Areas of 100-year flood to be protected by flood
protection system under constructiDn base flood
elevations and flood hazard factors rto determined.
Areas between limits of the 100-year flood and 500-
year flood; or certain areas subject to 1 00-year flood-
ing with average depths less than one (1) foot or where
the contributing drainage area is less than one square
mile; or areas protected by levees from the base flood.
(Medium shading)
Areas of minimal flooding. {No shading)
Areas of undetermined, but possible, flood hazards.
Areas of 100-year coastal flood with velocity (wave
action); base flood elevations and flood hazard factors
not determined.
Areas of 100-year coastal flood with velocity {wave
action); base flood elevations and flood hazard factors
determined.
NOTES TO USER
I
1·
I
I
I
ZONE C
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I REFERENCE 29
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
figure 3; Sam~le locations and approximate extent of contamination
~ ~ ,.
\
\
co-I J.
!]_!.:j
Approximate Scale: l "=330'
.LEGEND
3070 .~ Total concentration of TCE and 1,2-DCE
Water supply well
Soil boring
-----Approximate non-detect boundary
\
Davis Park Road
Incident No: 5628
Gaston County, N.C.
I
••
••
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
1•
m
I
g
•
I
n
0
u•·
I
APPENOIX A
I I
I
. . :-. I MAPS AND 1ABlES . . . . . . . I . I
I
1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
u
ill<
rtl
GASTON COUNTY
SOUTH GASTO
{UNINC.).
POP. 4,767
l
" • I
l!
C;!,sr,7~,IA I lfil
( .... _.l.!!-. A,;..,_
DAVIS PARK ROAD TCE SITE NCD986175644
OOC[JIG~~-n«)'~
GR[[NH0!1N[ & O'MARA, INC.
~ (DuO,Gl()t-1 RQ,IJl CRO:l-l80. T. IU.Rn.lU-0 20TTO
000 ~82-2&00
~-•n..,,,rr .. _.r;.,.-~T-~1/,.-oo..oun,u;,..--£)<7'()1<1,f',._
~-.-o.,v.-.--..u,,~...:.••~ T ~v,.~V,.~QWM.o<J
~-4'W..CUV..:~lurl-Jl.-"'l.OO"'>>O-~T r-"'.>' K...ov\.
I
~IGURE 1
SITE LIOCATION
SOURCE: North Carolina Ocp;irtmcnt of Transportation. County Road Maps. 1990.
a
JACl(SOt
'"°"·
-------------------• • •
ANALYTICAL RESULTS -EPA REGION IV ESD
PWOl PW02
(Cedar Oak Subdivision) (Charles May Residence)
07/06/90 10/09/90 07/06/90 10/09/90
CIS-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.8ppb(J) 3.4 ppb(A,J)
TCE
PCE
**Footnotes**
A= Average value
J = Estimated value
31 ppb
12 ppb
41 ppb
14 ppb
62 ppb 68 ppb(A,J)
Source: EPA Region IV ESD, Purgeable Organics Data Report 7 /18/90 and 10/25/90; Athens, Georgia
ANALYTICAL RESULTS -NCDEHNR State Laboratory of Public Health (6/11/90)
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
TCE
PCE
1,2 Dichloroethane
**Footnotes**
Howe
Residence
Trace
l(k)
1 (k)
WGAS
Radio Station
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given
Crumley
Residence
Trace
COE
Residence
l(k)
Trace
Source -North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Health Environmental Sciences Analysis Report
(Purgeable Compounds (6/21/90 and 6/22/90); North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR): Raleigh, North Carolina
• •
ANALYTICAL RESULTS -NCDEHNR STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH (7/13/90 -7/17/90)
CIS 1,2-Dichloroethylene
TCE
PCE
1,1-Dichloroethane
Ch 1 oroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethylene (TCE)
Tetrachloroehene
**Footnote**
Graves
Residence
7.0 ppb
Mccready
Residence
2.6 ppb
37.1 ppb
Trace
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
Moore
Residence
2.2
Trace
Trace
Trace
Trace
57.55 ppb
Trace
Goodwin
Residence
Trace
lK
Source: North Carolina Stat-e Laboratory of Public Health Environmental Sciences-Analysis
Report (Purgeable compounds (7/13/90 -7/17/90); North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR): Raleigh, North Carolina
•
• •
ANALYTICAL RESULTS -NCDEHNR STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH (8/23/90)
CJS 1,2-Dichloroethylene
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene (TCE)
Toluene
Tetrachloroethene
let rahyd rofu ran
1,2-dichloropropane
Benzene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
**Footnotes**
May
Residence
4.0 ppb
Trace (T)
Trace
116.3 ppb
Trace
1 ( K)
Trace
Monte
Residence (after
8 .1 ppb
7.2 ppb
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
T Trinalomethane
Monte
Filter) Residence (Before Filter)
1.5 ppb
1.0 ppb (K,T)
1.0 ppb ( K)
441.1 ppb
Trace
1.0 ppb (K)
Trace
•
Cedar Oak
Subdivision
Trace (T)
Trace
56.1 ppb
Trace
20.9 ppb
Source: North CArolina State Laboratory of Public
(Purgeable compounds (8/27/90 -8/28/90);
Health, and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR):
Health, Environmental Sciences Analysis Report
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Raleigh, North Carolina
-----------------~~ • • •
ANALYTICAL RESULTS -NCDEHNR STATE LABAORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
(6/14/90)
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Trichloroethylene (TCE)
Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
1,1,1 Trichloroethane
**Footnotes**
Rowland
Residence
Trace
Godwin
Residence
Trace
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
T -Trihalomethane
Fortner
Residence
Crenshaw
Residence
Trace (T)
1.2 ppb
1 (K)
Tarte
Residence
Trace
{I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
E
I
I
Norl11 C:rtroJ j_rrn Deportment of Human Resourcc:s
nivi.sion of Health Service
Environmental Epidemiology Branch
Orinking Water Health Risk Ev11-l:uat-ion For
Chlori11ated Solvents-.· __ _
LABORATORY NUMBER
Bas"d on these analytical results, this water is contaminated' with chlorinated solvents which have been widely used (both industrially and in home-use
products) for many years. One chlorinated solvent, vinyl chloride, is known to cause cancer in humans. Many other chlorinated solvents have' been shown to cause cancer in laboratory animals. However, none of these chemicals is known
to cause cancer in hwnans.
some chlorinated solvents have not been linked to cancer.
acceptable intake levels are much higher and are based on
For these chemicals,
other health effects.
The U. s. Envj ronmental Protection Agency l)as set maximum conl8i6inant levels
(MCL) for a 11umber of chlorinated solvents. The MCL is the ainount of a chemical that is considered acceptable in public drinking water supplies. Th-,
maximum contaminant level is not binding for users of private, supply wells, but is a useful guideline.
( )
J
Maximum Contaminant
Level (ppb) This' liell (ppb) //(, ,3,1j -1J·'f6t'JJJ
J', I f!,t -#-f'ot ;st
fc// //5 ,-----;j 'j'otJI1
st, I fl! ~ ;:/fa( '3ft
oiatcr is acceptable for all uses due to the very low levels present.
Resample in about ____ month(s). (PLEASE INDICATE Oil LIV) SHEET
THAT IT JS A RESN1PLE AND PROVIDE PREVIOUS SAMPLE NiJMllER( S).)
This water is significantly contaminated and should not be used for
drinking ot· cooking. Prolonged bathing/ihowering should; be avoided.
( ) This >1aler is highly contamincit:ed and should not be used for drinking,
cooking, or bathing/showering. • viii~ j1;J_ {1)f-Jk{L,
Commcnlc .~ Ji</~ t:11~ M . · _ _ / JJ rf1 ) _I . . /J_ _,t,A, tJM 111 ~ (01/Ui y, ~
{o11h~ {)'1fui,1;/l)O'J ~-~
~ }j(fcfl, . . ® v!, / j/ ())' L · M Jl /l0 /4 µ,Jik if_ P'f,~f' .J-3 ~jtJ !:&! I"' 1 f'V ;-:;::·,/ef; )
For· !u(llll'!' iri/nr;r .. 11.ir.,;1, r:•.l!ll.irt-:1. 8 I &
1-:1,id<!J11i11lt1•.rv nranch, ('.dY) ·1:, {-J'1 !•.:.
Ull)•: 'J',1 /1, ( Hc•v i ~;(:rl S/l.l':!)
i.;11,, i 1"•'1!\1111.'l; I ,7 I F1' i dr:':•;: ::, : ()'.J",' l',t",Jll•:11
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
,1
I
'··••·.·· I
I
I
I
I
I
-
. ' i
N.~. Dept. of Environment, Health and Natural K~sources
Division of Laboratory Services
State Laboratory of Public Health
P.O. Box 28017, Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Environmental Sciences Analysis Report
Name of Owner, P9-f;ient_
or Supply: (}95-(o,11
Collected By:
'
Analysis Desired: _...,W~~Y=='------
Laboratory Sample Sample Description or Remarks Results In
Number
Numbec
906355 fa-\ ~I 0-.1.,,•.,;_, .f~rK f2o1
9063SS 4 J\V(\~
'
SEE ATTN:
:i-e. fl,,, ,C, )f,-~ ,
9DG3S? ~ ('\O{)f<" . f<P {rt ,.,f,'/fer /Tr""\ ,
906358 r'w ('pr/Qr fhk r;._ Cr,"a Bcs5
r1n\"'u..., '..... ~/\ I '
f
.; • l'I \P ~
-1) r) s 0)1 T '
I\
Date Received -~X:--;J=-7~--2~0~~27~
,
.
.
,
.
,
.
,
_
_
c
__ Date Reported l(-2-'I-'itJ•
f¾· ED9HtC
Date Extracted
Date Analyzed \J~(j:, p/90 f)fff\
Reported By: ____ h] ,{:!Lfl,;~
DEHNR Form 2361 Revised (9-89)
l.aboratol'y
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:1
I
·,
ST ATE LAB00A TORY Of PUBLIC f'EAL 1f. 1
DIVISION Of HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. OEPARTIIENT Of fuWl RESOORCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. 1/lLMHIGTON ST, RALEIGH, N:C. 27611
Laboratory No. fi%3,55 PURGEABLE aJMPOUHDS Date of Analysis
roMPOIJHO µg/1 CXlMP(X,JHD
Dichlorodifluoronethane I I Chlorobenzene
Chlorarethane Ethvlbenzene
v"Vinvl Chloride 11 1.2-Tetrachloroethane
Brcm:methane n-Xvlene
Chloroethane m-Xvlene
Trichlorofluorarethane 0-Xvlene
/1 1-Dichloroethvlene Stvrene
Methvlene Chloride Brorofonn
tert-Sutvl Methvl Ether I )benzene
!Transl 1 2-Dichloroethvlene 1 1 2.2-Tetrachloroethane
I l ether Bronobenzene :
1 1-Dichloroethane . n-Pronvlbenzene
2.2-0ichlo~~ane 1 2 3-Trichlo~~ane
(Cisl L2-Dichloroethvlene I/-, n 2--Ch loroto 1 uene
Chlorofonn +,a.c.e.. -,-1 3.5-Trirrethvlbenzene
{BCMl .ararochloronethane Ii 4'-Ch loroto 1 uerie
✓1 1. 1-Trichloroethane J - • ~ • ITert) Butvl Benzene
l. 1-Dlchlorl'Vlr/V\l)ne 11 Penta ch loroeth'ane
✓Carbon Tetrachloride 1 2 4-TrirrethV:lbenzene
✓Benzene !Seel Butvl ae'nzene
✓1 2-Dichloroethane . n-J lto luene
✓Tri ch loroethvl ene /l!.,?, 1 3-0ichlorobenzene
1 2-Dichlormrmane .J-,..-~ ~ P_ ✓1.4-0ichlorobenzene
Brorrodichlorarethane 11 n-Butvlbenzcne:
Dibromarethane .y 1 2-Dichlorobenzene
Toluene k"n rJ . raisl 2 ChloroisNJroovl Ether
1 1.2-Trichloroethane u l. 2-Dibroro-3 Ch loropropane
Tetrachloroethene \<.. 1 2 4-Trichlorobenzene
1 3-Dichloroormane " Hexachlorobutadiene
Dibronochloronethane Naohthalene '
1.2-Dibroroethane IEOBl 1 2 3-Trichlorobenzene
1--Ch 1 orohexane '
~HTS:
MDL -Minim.,n Detection Limit for water (EPA Method 502.2), is 1.0 µg/1.
J -Estimated value.
K -Actual value is knC>Wn to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U -llaterial was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed.
1/ -Tentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulated VOC
T -Tr1halarethane
N.C. Division of Health Services
OHS 3068--0 (1/89 Laboratory)
µg/1
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STATE I.ABOOATORY Of PUBLIC HEALH,
DIVISION Of HEALTH SERVICES, N;C. DEPARTMENT Of fUIAN RESCIJRCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILHINGTO!I ST, RALEIGH, ~.C. 27611
Laboratory No. f00,310 PURGEABLE <XlHf'CIJNDS Date of Analysis
COMPOUND )Jg/1 COMf'CIJND
,.
Dichlorcidifluoromelhane J Ch lorobenzene
Chloromethane Ethvlbenzene ,,r
v'Vinvl Chloride l l 1 2-Tetrachloroethane ..
Braranethane o-Xvlene
Chloroethane m-Xvlene ' Trichlorofluoromethane o-Xvlene
✓l 1-Dichloroethvlene Stvrene
tlethvlene Chloride Brorrofonn
tert--llutvl tlelhvl Ether I lbenzene
(Trans) I 2-0ichloroethvlene l. l.2.2-Tetrach10roethane
Is~rmvl ether Brmobenzene ,
l. 1-Dichloroethane n-Pronvl benze1ne
2,2-Dichloroorooane l. 2. 3-Tr i ch loroorooane
/Cisl 1.2-0ichloroethvlene 2-Ch lorolo l uene
Chlorofonn l . 3. 5-T r i rreth'vl benzene
IBCHl Bromxhloromethane 4-Ch loroto l uene
✓l. l 1-Trichloroethane /Tert l Butvl Benzene
l, l Olchlo,....-v,rnnPne Pentachloroethane
✓carbon Tetrachloride 1 2 4-Trirrethvlbenzene
✓Benzene /Seel Butvl Benzene
✓l 2-Dichloroethane o-1 ltoluene
✓Trichloroethvlene Y.. l 3-0ichlorobenzene
1.2-Dichlornnrnnane II ✓1.4-0ichlorobenzene
Braiudichlorcmethane n--llutvlbenzene
Dibraranethane 1.2-Dichlorobenzene
Toluene (Bis) 2 Chloroismrmvl Ether
l 1.2-Trichloroethane 1.2-Dibrorro-3' Chloroor~ane
Tetrachloroethene l 2.4-Trichlorobenzene
l 3-Dichlo=rmane Hexachlorobutadiene
Di brorroch l orcmethane Naohthalene
l 2-0ibrorroethane /EDS) 1 2.3-Trichlorobenzene
1-Chlorohexane I ' I
/, ·H"tlh,.~-n ho-A~ 7, 'J
I
OJ!;.,£NTS:
H0L -Hini11UTI Detection Limit for water (EPA tlethod 502.2), is 1.0 \Jg/1.
J -Estimated value.
X -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U -Haterial was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Hot analyzed.
1/ -Tentative identification.
✓ -Re9ulated voe
T -lrihalcmethane
N.C. Division of Health Services
OHS 3068-0 (1/89 Laboratory)
. ..
\Jg/ I
· . ..
;
.·
.. .. · . ...
.
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STATE I.ABffiATORY OF PUBLIC HEAL Tf
DIVISION Of HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARTMENT OF hurV-,N RESOORCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILHIIIGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
I
Laboratory No. 900,15'1 PURGEABLE rot1POUNDS Date o.fAna·l ys is ·
/.·
f-.
i '
COMPOUND µg/1 rot1POUND : .
•.•
Oichlorodifluorcmethane u Chlorobenzene • ·c
Chlorcmethane
v'Vinvl Chloride
Ethvlbenzene
1.1 1 2-Tetrachloroethane . ;_,,
Brorarethane n. Xvlene
Chloroethane m-Xvlene
Trichlorofluorcmethane o-Xvlene
✓·1. 1-Dichloroethvlene Stvrene
Plethvlene Chloride Brorofonn
tert-Butvl Plethvl Ether Isnnroovlbenzene
!Transl 1.2-0ichloroethvlene 1. 1 2 2-Tetrachloroethane
Is 1 ether Brarobenzene
1 1-0ichloroethane n-Proov 1 benzene
2 2-0ichloroorooane ' 1.2 3-Trichlo~~ane
ICisl l .2-0ichloroethvlene I, c:; 2-Ch loroto 1 uene
Chlororonn IK T
(BC/11 Brorrochlorcmethane LA
1 3 5-Trirrethvlbenzene
4-Ch loroto 1 uene
✓1 1. I-Trichloroethane /I< ITertl Butvl Benzene
1. 1-Dichlo ne u Pentachloroethane
✓carbon Tetrachloride J,, 1 2 4-Trirrethvlbenzene
✓Benzene K <sec) Bulvl Benzene
✓1 2-Dichloroethane LA n-l0 "'lrOQYltO 1 uene
✓Trichloroethvlene ,i.l}, I. I 1 3-0ichlorobenzene
1 2-Dichloroornnane ! / ✓1 4-Dichlorobenzene
Brorrodichlorcmethane n-Butvlbenzene'
Di brc:rrm-e thane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene
Toluene ' I iBisl 2 Chlorois 1 Ether
1 1 2-Trichloroethane ..l-ra c.r 1 2-Dibroro-3 Chlo, ane
Tetrachloroethene +mrP 1 2 4-Trichlorobenzene
1.3-Dlchlo.......,.,.rl'V'\ane I J Hexachlorobutadiene
Dibrorochlorcmethane N!!Qhthalene
l 2-Dibroroethane IEOBl ....11.,_3-Trichlorobenzene
1-Chlorohexane I
COlfENTS:
HQL -Hinirrun Detection Limit for water (EPA Plethod 502.2), is 1.0 µg/1.
J -Estimated value.
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U -Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed.
1/ -Tentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulated voe
T -Trihalcmethane
N.C. Division of Health Services
OIIS 3068..{) ( 1/89 Laboratory)
µg/1
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STATE LABOOATORY Of PUBLIC HEAL T ··1
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES, H.C. DEPARTIIEHT Of . ,,WI RESCIJRC£S
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 H. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, H:c. 2761_1_ .. ·· :·-_:··.-..• r/
9&0Ji2 PURGEABLE CXJHPCIJNDS ~~::of Analys1s,·:~(Js/ zQ.__ Laboratory Ne.
·. . .
' . -···
COMPOUND µg/1 CXJHPOO~D ·'. ~ .. •yg/l
Oichlorodifluorcmethane I/ Ch l orobenzene .. · I J
Chlorcmethane Ethvlbenzene . ,. '
v'Vinvl Chloride l l l 2-Tetrachloroethane . '
Bron:m?lhane o-Xvlene .. ;
Ch loroethane m-Xvlene • .. ..
Trichlorofluorcmethane o-Xvlene
v1 1-Dichloroethvlene Stvrene
tlethvlene Chloride Brarofonn
tert-Butvl Met.hvl Ether I lbenzene
{Transl l 2-0ichloroethvlene l, 1,2 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ismroovl ether Brarobenzene .
' l, 1-0ichloroethane n-Proovlbenzene
2 2-0ichlo ane l 2 3-Tricltlo ane
(Ci s) l, 2-0ich loroethvl ene , I 2--Ch loroto l uene
Chlorofonn +nue..., 1.3.5-Trimethvlbenzene
CBC/I) Braroch l orcmethane /j 4--Chlorololuene.
vl l, 1-Trichloroethane ·h71,, v <Tertl Butvl Benzene
l l Oichlo ne ' Pentachloroethane
vcarbon Tetrachloride l 2 4-Trimethvlbenzene
✓Benzene (Seel Butvl Benzene
vl.2-Dichloroethane ' P-l lloluene
vlri ch l oroelhvl ene <;, n. I l 3-Dichlorobenzene
1.2-Dichlor~rooane u vl 4-0ichlorobenzene
Bronodichlororethane n-Butvlbenzene
Dibrcrrarethane -v l 2-Dichlorobenzene
Toluene +ml' P. (Bis) 2 Chloroisnomnvl Ether
1. 1.2-Trichloroethane LA l 2-Dibraro-3 Chloroorooane
Tetrachloroethene 21!,t; 1 2.4-Trichlorobenzene
1.3-0ichlol""l"V'lrtv'lane u· Hexachlorobutadiene
Dibrarochlororethane N•nhthalene
1.2-Dibrorroethane (EDB) l 2.3-Trichlorobenzene ,/
1--Ch lorohe.ane I
ca'l"ENTS:
HDL -llininun Detection Limit for waler (EPA tlethod 502.2), is 1.0 µg/1.
J -Estimated value.
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known lo be greater than value given.
U -l\alerial was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Nol analyzed.
1/ -lentative identification. v -Re9ulaled VOC
T -Tr1halarcthane
N.C. Division of Health Services
OHS 3068-0 (l/89 Laboratory)
I Norl: \rol j na Department of Human Re \ces ~ f?jJ
\, C \' ... 1 ~gg Environmental Epidemiology Branch \,.~ 0 D)v).sion of Health Service y i
I ~ ~-•--~~1'.5 Drinking Water Health Risk Evaluation f,;,r J'<",b, ~~~ JtfC5\.:/~ Chlorinated Solvents v~ <f!;, ~'/}
, ,,,_ .. ,.,,.,.-" DATE: fF/f6 LABORATORY NUMBER fbJf 7~~,f!IPf.36
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Based on these analytical results, this water is contaminated with c~rinated solvents which have been widely used (both industrially and: in home-use products) for many years. One chlorinated solvent, vinyl chloride, is known to cause cancer in humans. Hany other chlorinated solvents have been shown to cause cancer in-laboratory animals. However, none of these chemicals is known to caUse cancer in humans.
some chlorinated solvents have not been linked to cancer. For these chemicals, acceptable intake levels are much h.igher and are based on other health effects.
The u. S. Environmental Protection Agency has set maximum contaminant levels (HCL) for a number of chlorinated solvents. The HCL is the amount of a cl1emical that.is considered acceptable in public drinking water supplies. The maximum contaminant level is not binding for users of private supply wells, but is a useful guideline.. --'
Maximum Contaminant
Chemical Level (pob) This Well (pob)
;if/2 -# ljof'iti
J? !of; -ff-f/oF/2-7
S?, bffS -If fJPf 36
( ) This water is acceptable for all uses due to the very 1',ow levels present. ( ) Re sample in about ___ month ( s). ( PLEASE INDICATE ON LAB SHEET
J THAT IT IS A RESAMPLE AND PROVIDE PREVIOUS SAMPLE NUMBER(S).)
( This water is significantly contaminated -and should not be used for drinking or cooking. Prolonged bathi~g/showering should be avoided.
( ) This water is highly contaminated and should not be used for drinking,
cooking' or b~thing/shower ing j I~ £1 Ir fit ct:;-, /4u-f'twJ /41,)1 )', \
Comments: /µh fa ~~ 3 -:di~/~/ , /. MA/i y( o/J ~ re [JM ;.w,.,z,,{ /.v kw, /;Jd,//1< ,Ni _ !dA-r ,.,, r !1Q•7l_f
For furUier .informr.1tiQn, c:u11lncL 4it6M<&
lcpidemioloc1y nranch, (S.l9) 71.1-341(:.
LJHS T,1'/r, ( Rev.,se<l s;eg)
F.1\\•.irnnn1en1Al Fp:idem:ioloq·_1 lt1·,.Jri1:l1
I ls◄@Pt Jlr. Ken Rudo, Envjron.mental
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
D
_I
I
I
·,,
Ne ,1 Carolina Dei:,~:':!'.'.'.!nt of Hu.mar, _.esources
Di.vis.i.on of Health Services ' Environmental Epidemiology Branch
Drinking Hater Health Risk Evaluation
General
DATE =~4-1;_Jc1-ff_D __ LABORATORY NUMBER ' f'oJ'l]) --~---1-,----(✓ Based on these analytical results, this water shOuld be cOnsidered·safe for normal usage.
( ) Chemical analysis did not show any contamination. Water should be resampled if odor or taste persists.
( ) The water should not be used for drinking or cooking purposes, avoid prolonged bathing/showering.
( ) Based on these analytical results, this water is highly contaminated ·and should not be used for drinking, cooking, or bathing/showering.
( ) The laboratory" results are not conclusive, please resarnple:
for further information, contact Dr. Ken Rudo Epidemiology Branch, (919) 733-3~10.
lJHS 'N"/~ (Revised $/89)
Environmental Epidemiology Branch
,
i@VifiAMA• Environmental
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
D
D
I
I
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health and Natura,
Division of Laboratory Services
State Laboratory of Public Health
P.O. Box 28047, Raleigh, N.C. 27611
\ ' Re'sources
Environmental Sciences Analysis Report
Address:
Name of Owner, Patient G
or Supply: ~C? Jfe h
!/21 I::, ~ /2CY.!
County:
Report To:
Address:
Date Collected:
Collected By:
Analysis Desiied:
Laboratory Sample Sample .Description or Remarks Results In
Number Number
905928 {o-/;, f:n•i.Jl.J6 f<csq r-vJp )e
---·
onc-92'-3 •.J·,).~ ,. (0-7 /1c fi~oJi., 1<(:'Sc11'1,C/e__,
/
90~9,?,0 (o-)J (r)co,,~ Ck.)/
or,c-9')i "--"'-J 0 (()-)3 G-o:d 4-1) n P 1,J / I'
SEI 1 ATTACHED ~~
'
'
.
Date Received _7~-_!_3_-~9~0~-~!J~lt~---Date Reported 7-2-0-Yt!
Date Extracted Date Analyzed m~b?/ruA;frrL
Reported By: ~ K ~~
DEHNR Form 2364 Revised (9-89)
Laboratory
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
') STATE LABORATORY Of PUBLJC HEAL T! )
DIVIS !Dh vf HEALTH SERVICES, N. C. DEPARTMENT Of , .,,WI RESCXJRCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. ~ILMINGlOO Sl, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
Labor a tory No. _9"--'1'-'-l-'-5'.,,_,9"'-J-,;f __ PVRGEABLE COMPOUNDS Date of Analysis
COMPOUND µg/1 COMPOUND
.
Dichlorodifluorarethane /J Chlorobenzene ,
Chlorcmethane Ethvlbenzene I
.rvinvl Chloride 1 1. l 2-Tetrachloroethane
Brororethane o-Xvlene I
Chloroethane m-Xvlene
Trichlorofluorarethane o-Xvlene
✓1.1--0ichloroethvlene Stvrene
llethvlene Chloride Braroform
tert--8utvl Methvl Ether IsoorrY'lvlbenzene
fl rans 11. 2-Di ch loroethvlene l 1 2 2-Tetrach'loroethane
I l ether Brarobenzene
l 1--0i ch loroethane n-P )benzene:
2 2--0ichlo=rooane l 2 3-Trichloroorooane
/Cisl l 2 Dichloroethvlene 2--Ch loroto 1 uenel
Chlorofonn 1.3 5-Trimethvlbenzene
IBC/11 Brorochlorarethane 4--Ch loroto l uene I
✓1. l. 1-Trichloroethane (Tert) Butvl Benzene
l 1--0ic.hlor~~ne Pentachloroethane
✓Carbon Tetrachloride l, 2, 4-Trimethvl benzene
✓Benzene (Seel Butvl Benzene
✓1.2-Dichloroethane p-ls l toluene
✓Tri ch loroethvlene , J.n 1 3--0ichlorobenzene
1.2--0ichlorm=ane II ✓l 4-Dichlorobenzene
Brorodichlorarethane I n--8utvlbenzene I
Di brom:m2 thane l 2-Dichlorobenzene
Toluene (Bis\ 2 Chlorois l Ether
l 1.2-Trichloroethane 1,2-Dibroro-3 Chloroormane
Tetrachloroethene 1.2 4-Trichlorobenzene
l 3-0lchlort'Ylrmane Hexachlorobutadlene
Dibrorochlorarethane Nanhtha Jene
1.2-Dibrcmoethane (EOOl 1 2,3-Trichloroc>enzene
1--Ch lorohexane I '
-
MDL -Minirrun Detection Limit for water (EPA llethod 502.2), is 1.0 µg/l.
J -Estimated value.
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U -l\aterial was analyzed for but not detected.
liA -Not analyzed.
1/ -Tentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulated VOC
T -Tr1halarcthane
N.C. Division of Health Services
OHS 3068--0 (l/89 Laboratory)
µg/1
11
I ' I
I
I
i
i
;
I ,v
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
I
.I SlAlE LA80RA10RY Of PUBL JC H[All .\
DIVISION OF HEALlH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARlMtNl Of hvl'IAA RESOJRCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. W!LMINGTON Sl, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
Laboratory No. 9oSf'.c2 9 PURGEABLE CO/;PCX.JNDS Da Le of Ana 1 ys is
COMPCXJND vg/1 COMPCXJND
' Dichlorodifluoronethane u Ch 1 orcb€nzene:
Chlorarethane Ethvlbenzene
,!Vinvl Chloride I I l 2-Tetrachloroethane
Bro-rare thane P-Xvlene
Chloroethane m-Xvlene '
Tri ch lorofl uoronethane o-Xvlene
✓1 1-Dichloroethvlene St vrene
l\ethvlene Chloride Brarofonn
tert-8utvl l\ethvl Ether · Is !benzene
(Transl 1 2-llichloroethvlene 1 1. 2. 2-T etrach loroethane
I 1 ether Brarobenzene
1.1-llichloroethane n-Pr,vw 1 benzene
2 2-Dichloroorooane 1.2 3-Trichlo"">ron.ane
(Ci sl 1 2-Dichloroethylene :} .fn 2-Ch loroto 1 uene
Chlorofonn ii 1 3 5-Trirrethvlbenzene
(BCM) Brarochloronethane 4-Ch loroto 1 uene
✓1 1 1-Trichloroethane (Tert) Butvl Benzene
l. 1 Di ch l ormrf'VV>ne Pentachloroethane
✓carbon Tetrachloride 1 2.4-Trirrethvlbenzene
✓Benzene (Seel Butvl Benzene
✓1.2-Dichloroethane ' o ls 1 toluene
✓Tri ch 1 oroethvlene .'I 'I . I 1,3-0ichlorobenZene
1 2-Di ch lorooronane () ✓l ~-Olchlorobenzene
Braroci ch lorarethane n-Butvlbenzene '
Dibraronethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene
Toluene (Bis) 2 Chlorois 1 Ether 1 1 2 Trichloroethane '
Tetrachloroethene +ro..c e.
.J..,] Dibrom-3 Chloroor~ane
1 2 4-Trichlorobenzene
1 3-Dichlo==ane I J Hexach lorobu tadi1ene
Dibrorochloronethane Naohthalene
1 2-llibro-roethane (EOB) 1 2 3-Trichlorobenzene
1-Chlorohexane ;
-
COINcNTS:
I MDL -Mini= Detection Limit For water (EPA l\ethod 502.2), is 1.0 vg/1.
I
I
I
I
J -Estimated value.
K -Actual value ls known to be less than value given.
L -'Actual value ls k-nc,.,m to be greater than value glven.
U -Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed.
I/ -Tentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulated VOC
T -Tr1halcm,thane
N.C. Division of Health Services
(X-jS 3068-0 ( 1/89 Labor a Lory)
vg/1
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
u
D
I
I
I
I
)
SlAlE LAflORATOf<Y Of PUBLIC HEALlH
DIVISION Of HEALlH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARTMENT Of HUMAN RESCX!RCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. ~ILMINGlON Sl, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
Laboratory No. £!):'ff' 30 P\JRGEABLE COMPCXJNDS Date of Analysis
COMPCXJND µg/1 C()MP(XJNO
'
Oichlorodifluoronethane 11 Chlorobenzene,
Chloronethane Ethvlbenzene
✓Vi nvl Chloride 1.1. 1 2-Tetrachloroethane
Broranethane o-Xvlene
Chloroethane m-Xvlene
Tri ch lorofl uoronethane o--Xvl ene I
✓l. 1-0ichloroethvlene Stvrene
Methylene Chloride Brcrroform
tert-Sutvl Methvl Ether IsmrnnvlbenzeOe
(Trans)l 2-Dichloroethvlene l, 1 2,2-Tetrachlon1£>thane
Is/Y\rvvwl ether . Brarobenzene 1
1. 1-0ichloroethane -ka_c_.e_, n-Propylbenzene
2 2-0ichlo~~ane 11 1 2 3-Trichlo ane
(Ci s) 1.2-0ichloroethvlene ' /), ;J 2-Ch lorotol uene
Chloroform . .L.,,., r P I l 3 5-lri.-ethvibenzene
(SOI) Brorrochloronethane I J 4-Ch lorotol uene
✓l. l. l-Trich1oroethane .J_.... ~ (' "' (lert) Butyl Benzene
1 1-0ichlo ne u Pentachloroethane
✓Carboo Tetrachloride -1..l.±:-Tri.-ethtlbenzene
✓Benzene J/ (Seel But;•l Benzene
✓l 2-Dichloroethane ·f-pl l'_P. · c-Is~r~vltoluene
✓Tri ch loroethylene c; '1,. ",;;, 1.3-0ichlorobenzene
l . 2--0l ch l ornnrfY'lane J) ✓l 4-Dichlorobenzene
Brom:xlichlorom,thane n-Butvlbenzene
Dibroranethane l 2-Dichlorobenzene
Toluene (Bis) 2 Chloroisooroovl Ether
l. 1 2-Trichloroethane , l 2 Dibrorro-3 Chlo~r~ane
Tetrachloroethene ...J-r-01'0 l 2.4-Trichlorobenzene
1 3-0lchlOl'VV\rYYl30e I 1 Hexachlorobutadiene
Oibrorrochloronethane i N>nhthalene ' 1 2-Dibroroethane /EOO) l. 2, 3-Tri ch loroo€nzene
1-Ch 1 orohexane \}'
-
-
KOL -Kinim..rn Detection Limit for water (EPA llethod 502.2), is 1.0 µg/1.
J -Estiruted value.
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -·Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U -Material was analyze<1 for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed.
1/ -lentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulatcd VOC
T -Tr1halarcthane
N.C. Division of Health Services
OHS 3068--0 (1/89 Laboratory)
µg/1
u
.I
I
I
I
I
I
D
0
I
I
I
I
I
I SlAlE LASORMORY Of PUBLIC HEALl! \
DIVISIO.-. J HEALlH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARlMrnl Of . _ . .AN RESO.iRCES
P.O. SOX 28047 -306 N. WJLM!NGlON S1, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
Laboratory No. f%: 5'j~J / PURGEABLE COMPOONDS 'Date of Analysis
COMPCXJND 1Jg/l COMPCXJND
Dichlorodifluororethane I) Chlorobenzene :
Ch 1 orarethane I Ethxlben,ene ' I
.'Vinvl Chloride 1 1. 1.2-Tetrachloroethane
Broranethane o-Xvlene I
Chloroethane m-Xvlene
Trichlorofluorarethane o-Xvlene
✓1. 1-Dichloroethvlene Stvrene
Methvlene Chloride I Broroform
tert-Sutvl Methvl Ether I Is ·-1 benzene
(lrans) 1,2-0ichloroethvlene I 1. 1 2.2-Tetrachloroethane
Is 1 ether ' I BrOTObenzene
1 1-0i ch loroethane I n-Proovl benzene
2 2 Dichlo==ane i 1 2 3-Trichlo'""'~ane
(Cis) 1 2-0ichloroethvlene I 2-Chlorotoluene 1
Chloroform I 1 3 5-Trimethvlbenzene
(BCM) Bromxhlororethane : 4-Chlorotoluene:
✓1 1, 1-Trichloroethane ' (Tert) Butyl Benzene
1 1-0ic'hlor~'""""ne Pentachloroethane
✓C.rboo Tetrachloride 1,2,4-TrimethXlDenzene
✓Benzene (Sec) Butvl Benzene
✓1.2-0ichloroethane u D ls ltolue'ne
✓Tri ch loroethvlene Lr~ re. 1 3-0ichlorobenz'ene
1. 2-0l ch 1 orrYHYY1ane I ✓1 4-0ichlorobenzene
Bronodichlorarethane ' ' n-Butvlbenzene I
Di b ron:me thane i 1 2-0ichlorobenzene
Toluene I (Bis) 2 Chloroismrmvl Ether
1 1 2-Trichloroethane 'i,/ 1 2-Dibrcm:>-3 Chloroorooane
Tetrachloroethene /K 1 2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1 3-Dichloroorooane I I Hexachlorobutadiene
Dibromxhlororethane I ' Nanhthalene '
1.2-Dibroroethane (EOB) I 1 2 3-Trichlorooenzene
1-Chlorohexane ,I/
'
-'
I rofl:NTS: /)n,de.n+,£eJ f eA..k f'tSc.nl--
1 MDL -Kinirn.rn Detection Limit for "ater (EPA t\ethod 502.2), is 1.0 1,Jg/l.
I
I
I
I
J Estiir.,ted value.
K -Actual value is k"°"'n to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is k"°"'n to be greater than value given. u -l\aterial "as analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed.
1/ -lentatlve ldcntif\cation.
✓ -Resulatc-d VOC
T -ir1halcxrcthane
N.C. Division of Health Services ms 3068--0 ( 1/89 Laboratory)
1,Jgll
/,/
!
I ' I
I I
I
I
I
;
I
'
' v
couNTY {:..,,-1 s fo1"
OUAO NO. f i0, (i \SERIAL
-V I ? t' LAr . .5.> /3 1".£ LONG.
/·JO.
01-,'11'' 5: /,--,
I
N.C. DEMTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES~
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Report !O; ARO. FRO~-. ARQ, WaRO, WiAO.
G-~\ -Of~~ SJO!!
SAMPLE PRIORITY wsno, r<in~1on FO 0 ther
FIELD ANALYSES
OH 4 00
1emp. 10 ____ 0 c Odor
./,.,.--..
.i.ppearance __ '7).1-L..<c.·.o'f.'--Taste ______ _
Field Analysis Sy: _____________ _
L f BORA TORY ANALYSES
BOO~ 3'0 m,;i/1
COD Higl'l ,,o men
coo Low ~ J 5 mo/J
ColiJorm:Mf r .. , at J 1 6 t 6 / J00n,J
Colllo1m;MT To1o1t ] 1 '.,(J~ / 100,nl
TOC 680 mo/I
Tur0idi!y 16 rnu
'" <OJ un, 1s
D ROU11 NE D El,1ERGE~ICY
Tl t.-lE PURPOSE: BASELINE.<:tQ~~•.
c ire I e
Owner /'C'd r-<? (l1ssd.
Localion or site ;:)c;u15
Oescrip1ion or sampling point
Sarnplini;:i Method
Remarks
(pump, bailer, etl'.)
Diss. Solids 70300 AQ · Silor 1077
F Juotide 951 mQ/1 Al • Aluminum 1105
H.irdness:Toul 900 mo/I El•· llartum 1001
mQ/1 Ca · C.11cjum,.9.:1.6."
Ploonols J27J0 uo/J
Soeclrlc Cona. 95 uMnos/cm1
t ,.,.
Cu • Coppe[::10~.2
LAB NUMB!:.R 8 Xz ~
OA1E RECEIVE0?-/3-?C) Time 9.cv
Rec'd by:~ From; Bu~
Other
OAT,\ EIJTRY BY: ---l..,1!,.,,,___ __ ,CK:_~
0 A 1 E RE PORTE O: --4-==-i,_L~c)"------·
COMPLI ,\i·JCE. LUS~-. OTHER
one)
.,.,,:..~--1
, ,,.-: , , I-rt C,_J I
C' I[ / '' " ,,,, " ,_. ,
Sample Interval I )
C
L / ✓--
1,
(pumping time. air 1emp, elc.}
uo/1 01111nocl'llorlnt P1,1lciC•i
., -..-_ ·:I .A/Q.!::.,,
.,-
UQ/1 0,,;11nooho,ol'loru, P,,1ic!dt1
uo/1.
moll Ac, d Htldoctd•I
uo11
uo /I B 1 <• I Ntulr&I E, 1f IC t 1 0 I• 0,,;11n1c,
AC i (l E •If t C 11 DI 1 0ri;:tf'1CI
' ,,·;·: Pur O• ii DI o Oro1nics (\•QA Do 111 t)
-.•·
Alkallnity 10 pH u ... m,;i/1 1LJLJI l "' 1.h,;inesiu·~· "' ,·: i'. '1 \· l. \_·,~\me.ii<·.' '.' Oio,omoell'l 1ne (EOB J r Alkalinity ,o "' 8; J ., 5 mg/I Mo Milnoanete 1 0 5 5 UQ//
Cuoon11e "5 mo/I "' Sodium "' moll y /r \.. : Tt .-·c i,;c'· •' <!i.. ,tr,,t
Bic111.iona1e ... me/I Ni N,n.e1 1061 UQ/1 ,J ·, Ph' fr.•,,, ,olr,, -,!
A1senic:Toul 1002 VOii
......... ~
TKN 1.s N 625 m,;i/1 " ltad 105 1 uo/1 .
/ -;,., .J.,.J ,-o/ i \ Car0on dlo1lde "' mo/I
Chloride ,,o mo/I
Ch,omlum:H1t, 1032 U\j/1
mQ/1
P;To11J as P 665 mo/I
S, Selenium l I~ 1 UQ/1
z, Zinc 1091 uo/1
/ -
f--~E-A-R • ~ UKGANICS
,NAL '-.Jl.,J n.t.r'l)l<f
Color;True 60 P1-Co
Cy1nld1 ',0 moll \ I \..
V -Lub Comments:
G Vl-S 4 1ised 7/85 ror Dissolved Analysis· sui.;mit fil \'/hl1" c:nriv ~ 1.1,..,,,,,.,,,,.,,.,~,: · .. ----l!!!!!!!!!!I 1!!1!11
'!d sample and wri1c ·01s· in block
iill -

-
--lilill -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAB NO.
REPORTED BY
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SUPERVISOR
SAMPLE TYPE:
STORET HO.
--) \
VOLATILE AflALYTICAL REPORT
0Ci736
~
fµ3
' ENTERED BY ba,
&/l CHECKED BY f:fL
tlx'i;,
DATE~ 7?2-K
SEDIMENT
At-lAL YSIS RES UL TS
( COMPQUHD CONCENTRATION
~ VOLATILE ORGAHIC COMPQU"IDS DETECTED BY GC/ELCD/PID.
(
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAB NO.
REPORTED BY
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SUPERVISOR
SAMPLE TYPE:
STORET NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC REPORT
[Xj736
wr EI-ITERED BY
frlJ I CHECKED BY
JYJJ
DATE~
' -J<eK
SEDIMENT
ANALYSIS RES UL TS
COMPOUND
GC/MS INDICATES A QUANTITY OF LATE ELUTING CHEMICALS
( LATER THAN ..-z FUEL 01 L & DIESEL FUEL) THAT COULD NOT BE
RESOLVED OR IDENTIFIED. CONCENTRATION WAS ESTIMATED AS
A RATIO TO A K~N EXTERNAL STANDARD AND IS IN THE RA~E
OF:------------------------------------------·
h2.
. -re_
' CONCENTRATION I
UG/KG
14000
L,\8 NUl,IBER 8 CG 73S-
DATE RECEIVEDL:/ -3-y() Time
Reper/ lo: ARO, FRO§) RAO. WaRO, WiRO,
WSRO. Kinsion FO 0 !her D ROUTINE D EMERGENCY
Rec'd by~ From: Bus~
Other ,,. {)
D,\TA ENTRY BY: D/ CK:@<
DATE REPORTED: 9 Z.vfgo ) j Shipped by: Bus,(10t-9· Oiher _______ _
~ I '· ) I I COLLECTOP(Slc LJPCfti!?/ /'/, .. ,,,c,• Oft.TE rz.11 ') /7{j TIME EQ_ PURPOSE: UASEL:r-iE. c~~
~~~(~\~cle
C01.1PLIMJCE. Lus~.-. OTHER
one)
FIELD ANALYSES Owner ?0:1 ,,l,/oore. (l,,asee)
prt 400 ____ Spec.-Cond-:-g4 ___ a r ·2s0c
0 do r __ ½LrL1c.1.c'/<C1cc1.c«;....._ -Ternp.10 ____ °C
Appearance C?/~-. .,:s~
_;/),:.: ':; 1-
Taste ______ _
Fie Id Analysis By: _____________ _
LABORATORY ANALYSES
!lOO~JIO mo/I
C(;O High J~O mo/!
COD low JJ ~ m,;,/1
Coli!orm:Mr f ~c;II J 16 1 6 l!OOml
Colilorm:MF To l.a J JI 50~ 1100ml
TOC 680 mo/I
Tusbidi!y 76 rnu
pH ~ 0.'.l uni 1s
Al~alinlly top H ~. 5 <>O mo/I
"lkallnlty 10 "' 8'' ., ' moll
' molt
S!call,on•te .i I--+--" mo/I
1002 uo/1
Carbon dtoiJCI ' "' mo/I
Chloride 9~0 mo/t
Chromlum:Ho!J 1032 uon
Color:True 80 Pt-Co
Cy1nld• 720 mo/I
Lab Comme_nts:
Location or siie
Description
Sampling 1·.1ethod
AeniarKs
Diss. Sollds 70JOO
Fluodde "'
Hi-rdnes,:Tot•I 900
H81dness (non-ca1b) 902
Phenols J27JO
Specllic Cond. " Sulra1o, 9<5
Sul r Ide ,. '
mo/I
mon
mo/I
mo/I
U0/1
uMtlos/cm2
mo/I
mo/I"
. . ' ... , ....... ~c ~• .•--r-TffiAL
'-'· --·· .
c: i: ·;(: :_· ~~C-~.5 AND
r-:n:--.!;.:;_;s;·:· ' :·:~"\'I:.LOPMF.N L
') 19\J\I : -
Nl-13 " N 6/0 mon
lK~ _a .. ~ ,,N~ ~?>.,.,,,·,l.'tiiHI urnU::lh\[Jtfo/1
'118 l'•'~~iiin,rn nHIC[ moll
P:f~J;t u P ~ 665 mo/I
G W-5 -1 ·,ised 7/85 ror Dissol\/ed Analysis -sui;:-riit Ii' - - -
11!!!!!!1 liiii
(pumping time, air lemo. e!c.)
Ao Si I vu 1077 uoll 0,01nochlodn1 P••licid11 ,, Aluminum I 1 05 110/1 Oro1nopho1phoru, P • I ti CI d I I
B, Bui um 1007 uoll .
c, C1tclum ' " molt AC id li1rdiC•<:1•1
c, Cadmium 10:n ug/1
Chrom1um:To1a! , o::i ~ U0/1 ... Bis• I N•ullll El lflC 11 bl •. o,o,nic I ..
c, Cop~;/-·1_6·.a·_··,; :/ ;, . UQ /I ': AC id E,1r1ct10l1 Oro• ni c, ,. lion ,. 1 O_• 5 Ii'•· ' uo /I
Ho , .. Mercury_ 1 i 900 UQ /I I Put O I I bl• Oro•n•c• (VOA b o Ill•)
Po1a ss,i_~;l' ,_9_3 7 ' ·/ •1ri:1_otr·. ··-c-·~ ..
Mo Maon,sium 927 ._; •-: mw> ''' Oi01omo1th1n• (EOBJ
Mo MH1Qill&$e 1 05 5 ... u.o~! .. 1(.j , .. ..• , ·1·1 i
'" SodiufTl~ ingi •,l ;··I,','''-' .... m_o/},
Ni Ni<: k e I 1067 j{,:-\LLii.lli, uO~i--' IX I LY_.. /1n·1/ f,,,1:-?b-.f.L.,
" Le .ad 1 0 ~ I u::/1 / T;:'i-/ f (""/2.f'O/,,rc < s, Sal• ni urn 110 uc /I (/ /1/,,J...,,-,:;, Ii
'" l inc 1092 uc/1
l"E AT{llf'! Ir-.--
ANAL Y,1, " ... ,...,s
.. -..
\/ )'
·en $.lmple anrt wrilo ·n1::;• in block -- - -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
,,
✓
LAB NO. o:;735
REPORTED ff/
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SUPERVISOR
?1@
hf}?
ate
~eK
SAMPLE TYPE: SEDI HEHT
STORIT hV. COMPOUND
VOLATILE A~LYTICAL REPORT
ANALYSIS RESULTS
EITT ERED ~ _U""'-"'st"----
CHECKED BY -~;,q::::"----
,CONCENTRATION
NO VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED BY GC/ELCD.
45510 M,P-XYLENES
45510 0-XYLEHE
21 UNIDENTIFIED PEAKS DETECTED BY GC/PID.
1 0 UG/KG
9.3 UG/KG 'J
.·-.
.. )
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ll
LAB~.
REPORTED BY
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SUPERVISOR
ex,735
'
cc?
em
Jm
r]?iJ!,
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC REPORT
DAT£#
ENTERED BY _D~ac.___
CHECKED BY --::-=r<YJ'r--f-__ --
SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIMENT
STORET NO.
AHALY313 RESULTS
COMPOUND CONCENTRt,TION
GC/MS INDICATES A QUANTITY OF LATE ELUTING CHEMICALS
(LATER THAN "2 FUEL OIL & DIESEL FUEL) THAT COULD t-llT BE
RESOLVED OR IDENTIFIED. CONCENTRATION WAS ESTIMATED AS
A RATIO TO A KNOWN INTERNAL STANDARD AND IS IN THE RA~E
UG/KG
OF 44000
A TENTATIVE IDENTIFICATION WAS ATTEMPTED ON FIVE ( 5)
EARLY ELUTING SIGNIFICANT PEAKS DETECTED BY GC/MS.
CONCENTRATIONS WERE ESTIMATED AS A RATIO TO A K~N
INTERNAL STANDARD.
UNI DENTI Fl ED 850
ALKANE 1500
ALKAHE 1500
ALKANE 1900
UNIDENTIFIED 2000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Ms. Pat DeRosa
Chief, Cercla Branch North Carolina DEHNR P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611
Dear Ms. DeRosa:
REGION IV
345 COURTLAND STREET. N.E .
. ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30365
l1t(;t;JVE[J
JUL ::o 1990
Sl!PERrlJND SEGTiOl\!
July 27, 1990
I have enclosed the results from the Davis Park Road drinking water samples collected by Phil Henderson on July 6, 1990 ·, and analyzed by the EPA laboratory in Athens, Georgia. As you can see these results are somewhat lower than the most recent results reported by the North Carolina laboratory. Region IV policy requires that the "removal action level" for a specific compound (128 ppb for trichloroethylene) be exceeded before this office can contemplate the provision of an alternate source of drinking water to affected residents. In addition, the data used to make this determination must be developed at the EPA laboratory.
Because the levels in both wells are quite elevated and another laboratory has reported significantly higher concentrations, this office will sample these wells on a quarterly basis.' The next scheduled sampling event for these wells will be Octdber 6, 1990. I encourage you to continue your monitoring of this problem. If you develop data demonstrating that the concentrations are increasing, we will re-evaluate our sampling schedule.
If you have any questions regarding this matter pleasf contact me at 404/347-3931.
Sincerely,
#.!)~
Don Rigger, tOri":scene Coordinator Emergency Response and Removal Branch
PURGEABLE ORGMJJCS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MAtJAGEMEtlT SYSTEM EPA-REGIOIJ IV ESD, ATHEIJS, GA. .. .. .. ..
PROJECT IJO. 90-725 SAMPLE NO. 48046 SAMPLE TYPE: SOURCE: DAVIS PAR~; RD. . ~ \ STATION ID: PW02 DAVIS PARK RD. ( MCA~ Ke, •O...<'<-<..cJ
2SU ·2s1,
2GU
25U
25!J
25U
2':>0U
_,,-· 250U-25U
2:SU .-,,: t I "~' •,1i..,n11 a:sJ
25!.!
2.SOU
CHLOROMETHANE
V HIYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETIIANE
CIILOROETftAiJ[
TR!LHLOROfLUURUMtlHANE
1.1-DJCHLOROETHENE( 1. 1-DICHtOROfTHYl.fNEJ ACt TONE CARRON-O!SULFJDE
~.!ETHYL.E::E Cl·ILORID[
TRANS-1. ~-DICHLOROtTHEl!E . ~ ..... ,..., .. "'"'"--•····-'., u.1.vru .. ur.vt.: IMANC VH!YL !\C!:T.".TE
C!S-1 .2-DJCHLOROFTHENE ') '">-n, ru, ,..,,..,,...,,..,...,,..,,... •, ,,.. ._ • ._ .., .1. .,, ,._v"vr '"-'r ""'•L Mf I HVI I-1 ~VL !<.E"! '-'~!!: n,..,,...,,,..,,...," ,.....,,..,.,. __ ,,. ·•-..,,,.vi11v1.,n1...vr,.vmc I n.:-1Nc 1.'HLOROf"O~~J
1 . i . '1 -TR I Ci-ii_(JR,-1tTHil.M!:
1. 1-·DICHLOROPROrEf.JE c~Ak80N fEl~~•:HLOR!DE 1 . 2-0 I CIILORO[THANE
8!:NZUl!:
TR1CHLQij0ETii~NE(TkllHLUKUtrHYLEMtJ
1 . 2-0 J CHLOROrROPAIJE fJ I BR(1M1".JMI::: I H°'Nt [3~Q!,10U I CHLUR.GME THMJE
"'*FOOTNOTES•**
DRKWATER PROG ELEM: SSF C !TY: GAS TOtJl A COLLECTION START:
COLLECTED DY: P. !!ENDERSON
SI: NC 07/0G/9o raao srnP: on;oo;no
t_lG/L M!ALYTICAL r-EJULTS
25U CJS-1 ,3-D!CHLOROPROPENE 'i50LI MtlHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 25U TOLUEN[
2~1.1 TP.MJS-1. 3-DICHLOP.OrROrrnc 25U 1. 1. 2-TRICHLOROETHANE 25U---TE-TRACI ILORO[TI l[IJ[ ( TETRACHLORuE flWL Eflf' 1 25ll 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 2GOU METHYL UUTYL t..ETONF. 251_1 DI BRm.10CHLORot,1ETHMJE
25U CHLOR()RFN7FMl-
25t! l , l . 1 . ~ T[TR.ACHLOROEIHANE 25U tlHYL BENZENE 25U (M-AND/OR P-lXYLENF 251J 0-XYLnJE
25V ST"iKFNf ")t::tt pr-,r,1,,-..i:-,.... ... ,, ,.__.._, "-'1\'-'lllVI VI\UI ·/~U tH~.,_1MC'eEM.ZEM!:
2GU 1. 1. 2, 2-TF.TRAGHLOROETHAMf: .'.l.Sl.1 1 , 2. 3--TP. IC.! lLOROrROr t..1~[ 25U 0-CHLOf<t) I Ul IIENE 2511 P-CHLOROTOLUENE -.i~ll 1 :~-Ll! f."f-!Lr_,p_0~:M Et!~ 2SU 1: 4-DICHLOROBEN ENE 251.r 1, 2-D!CHLOROBE~~ EfJE
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT.ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPT!VE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MAT~HIAI •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER TH.AN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERJAL WAS AIJALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MJIJIMUM QUANTJTATIOIJ LIMIT.
-------l!!!!!!!!!!I 1!11!1!1 1!!1111 ;m llilil -
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ,\IJALYSiS MANAGEMEIJT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. .. ..
" .. PROJECT NO. 90-725 SAMPLE NO. 48045 SAMPLE TYPE: DRKWATER SOURCE: DAVIS PAR~, RD. r ) STAT!OtJ ID: PW01 CEDAR RD. SUBDIVISION\Co,...,r,u.,,/y we//
PROG ELEM: SSF COLLECTED CITY: GASTONIA
COLLECTION START: 07/06/90
□'!; P. HENDER SOI/ ST: IJC
1305 STOP: 00/00/00
07 / 18/~![I
• , ................................. f ......... * ... ' • • • • • • • • • •••••••••• ' ~ ' UG/l ANALYTICAL RESULTS ~G/L ANALYTICAL ~E~ULTS
5.0U
5,011 s.ou
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
~OU
50U--
5. 0U
5.0U s.cu ..... ni, 5:ou 5.QU
5i"1U
5.8:.! ... _,,1_1
s.ou
~.OU
5.011
5.0U ~.nu
0i
5.0U
S.LJU s.cu
Ci-iLORVMETHANC
V IMYL CH LOR IDE □ROMOMETHAIJE
CHLO~OETHAIJE
TRICHLUKUfi.UOKUMtlHANE
1.1-D!CHLOROETHENE( 1. 1-DICHLOROfTHYt_f'ME) ACElONE
CARROJJ-DISULF WE METHYLU~E CHLORIDE
TRANS-1 . L-U l CHLOROC. THD!E .. """""' ... -..~-~ ........ '. l UJ. .... rlLvr.ui.: I n/o-\NI:.
\l!MYL /\C!:T1\T!: CIS-1. 2-DICHLOROFTHf'Nf ,., ,., n r ru, ,.._,.,,..,,..,,..,,...,... • .,,-.._, ... -.., ~ ,.,, ,~,_,,,v,· "vr ,..,, .. L
Mr·1 HYI r n-fVL !'.ETr.:iM: n.-.,..,,,...,..,,. ,.....,....,,,--.... ,_ u"vmVl.,(ILUf\VMC I n1-1,r-,c 1·µ, non~n.>u
i ·.·1 :·i·.: TR'i;~:11LOKOE THI-INC
1. 1-DICHLOROPROPEi,E
cA.KUL1M Tt r ~_ri,;HLO?.!DE ~, 2-DICHLOROETHAI-JC
~!:Ml!::~JE
Ti,, i (.HLUKOE Ti if NE t T KI CH'..1-1K:Jt T HYL ENE. ) 1. 2-DlCHLOROPROPA:JE
fl i 1JF<(1Ml)Mf-I HA~Jt
:3 ?.Ch',OU I CHL0r\.CJME1HANE
'-'-'fOOTIJOTES•-t•
5.0U
5011
5.0U 5. Ql_t
5.0U
12
5.0LI GOU
';,. QI_I
5.0U
S.Q'..!
S. (Ill s.ou
S.OL'
5.Gi..i
S.Q!.!
~ (HJ s.ou
I:,. Ql_l
5.0U
5. ()!J f, ()li
G.OU
C:3. QI)
CI S-1 , 3-DI CHLOROPROPEIJE Mt: I HYL I SOBUTYL Y.ETOtJE TOLUnJE
TRANS-1. 2-DICHLOnornorrnc
1 .1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACl~OROETll[N[(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ
1. 3-DICHLOROPROPANE METHYL DLJTYL KE I-ONE 0 I BROMOCHLORrn,iE THA!JE CHLORCJRfM7fMl-
1 .1 .1 ,2 T[TRACHLOROETHANE t I HYL BEfJZEtJE
( M-Al-JD/OR P-l XVI. ENF 0-XYLENE
STYKFr,ff sr:.c:.~o:-:c:~:.:
ti!-?1.lM'_l~EMZEME
l .1 .2.2-TETRArt~I.ORO(fHANf
1, 2, 3-TRICHLC:r..OrROf'.:.JJE
0-CHLOR(Jf(JI HEN!::
P-CHLOROTOLUENE
1 :-1-r, I f'I-H '11.JnRf:~I !:))!: i: 4-DICi-iLOR"l~JBfN ENE
1, 2-Dl~HLOP.OSE1~ E:l~E
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIA!. •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO □

E

GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEf! •U-MATER!AL WAS ANAL'IZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. .. --------1!!11!!1 l!!!!!!!!!!!I 1!!!!!!11 1!11!1
PURGEABLE ORGAMJCS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND AfJAL'/SIS I.IANAGEMEIH SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, AlHEIJS. G,\. ...
•• .. ..
·······••:s••·· .:a-,.., ....... ,..,,,.-rt••t PROJECT NO. 90-725 SAMPLE NO. 48044 SAMPLE TYPE: TRI~ BLAN~. SOURCE· o.,vlS PAR~. RO. STAT IOIJ ID; TR IP ULAfJK TB-0 I
PROG El.El.I: SSF
CiTY: GASTOt-Jil\
COLLECTIOIJ STIIRT;
COLLECTED □'!, P. IIEIJDERSOfJ s r : t.JC 07/0G/90 STOP: 1X1/!1r)/(Jtl
07/18/~1 )
' .. . ...
••·ff f. f. • • • 4. 1" * •. • * :t II< •• f 't T "t ... ,t t T ;J -I ,I. .j. '•*.ff • f • • t f •TT T f • • • * t 1' T 'l'-,. TT t , .. UG/L AtJALYTICAL RESULTS IJG.'L At~AL\'TIC.t.L r-ESULTS
r
5.QU S. ()II s.ou
5.QU
3.0IJ :5_ OU
':>OU
50U
5.OU
5.0U
S.C!J
'::,l)ll
5.0U
5. 0L1
51·1u
5.G:J
..,. 1111 s:ou 5.QU
f,. OU
5.0U s_nu
:;_0:.:
5.0U
5.0U
J.00
CHLGRGMEiHMJC \J!MYL CHLORIDE ilROMOMETHANF
CHLOnCETHA:4[
TR!CHLUKUrLUOP.Ul.ltlHANE , 1 , 1-0 I CHLOROETHENE ( 1 . 1-0 I CHLORC1F THYL tME) ACETOIJE
-CARBON DlSIJl.:-F Jnf:-
t.~ETHY!..E:!E Cl :;___o~I CE
TRANS-1. ~-Lil 1 .. .'HLUROETHENE .. ,... .. ,... ... ~~-.-~,-... -' , 1 u l \.,I lLVn.vL I n1-1n1c VHJYL !'.CET.'\TE
C!S-1. 2-D!CHLOROFTHENE ') '"J_nTrt.Jl r,nr,t',r-,r,r, .,,,.. ._, ._ .., • ._,, ''-'-'"'-'' !\VI" l'"\l"L
MflHVl ~HNL ~.ET0Mt: nnn,,,.,.,,.,," ........ ,., •• --., • ··-1-JI\VtTIV\.,IILVl'\VN1C I nµ,NC
1:~LO~OFOP.tl
i. 1. i-TK i(.iilt)f<OfTHM.Jt
1, 1 ··DICHLOROrROPEIJE
1~.ARl}(1N rt r!-{,v:~LORIDE
1 .2-D!CIILOROETHANE
BUJ.!!:~l[
If\. i Ci-ii...0ROf. Tii[ t~f I f k i CHL'~1KUt I HYL E.N!::: J 1 , 2-0 I CHLOflOPRO~AIJE r, J AROM(•'-ff_ ! i;.n.~Jt
3RQi,',Ci)! CML0R0METHANC
,,..,fOOTNOTES•.a"'
5.OU 5011
5.0U
i; n11 sou 5.DU s~ou-sou 5. 01_1
~.OU
5. rn.i '::I. (Ju s.ou
5.0U
5.VU s.cu s ()IJ
S.OU
i.:. nn s:ou
r: OU s·ou
s.ou
5. ('11.1
CIS-1 ,3 .. DICHLOROPROP(IJE
MtlHYL JSOBUTYL ~ETONE TOLUENE
T~.-"\~JS-1 , 3-D 1 CHLOP-Of'fWP[IJ[
1, 1. 2-TRIGHLOROETHANE
iE.Tf?.ACI ILORO[_TH[i~[ (~TE TRACHL URGE T t-fY L·E NE-,1 1, 3=0JCHLOROPROPAIJE . METHYL BUTYL r..t·1 ONE
D! BROMOCHLOROMETHAt~E t.HLORIJP,FM7FM~
i . i, 1 , 2 T[TR,\CHLOROEIMANE
t I HYL BENZENE (M-AND/OR P-)XYLENF
O-XYLEtJE
3,TvRfNf nnn1,,-,r-,.,.,..,,,
~H~~O~t~!2ENE
1. i. 2, 2-TETRi~t'.1-HJ1Rt)E ft-Ulf,fE ~ , 2, 3-TP.1 CHLCr:crrwr A/J[ l)-CHL(1R(1 fl ii_ UEMF.
P-CHLOROTOLUENE
1 :~-1111·~1 ()l.)llllf:"U'? ~!!:
I :~-5it~[5~6~~~~ NE 1 , 2-D I Cll!...CROOEr~;: tJE
• A-AVERAGE VALUE • NA-NOT .ANALYZED • NA I-INTERFERENCES • J-ES T !MATED VALUE • N-PRESUMPT I VE EVIDEIJCE OF PRE'.;EIJCE OF Mii TER i !,i •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATER!AL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT, .. .. ---------
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Address:
County:
Division of Laboratory Services
State Laboratory of Public Health
P.O. Box 28047, Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Environmental Sciences Analysis Report
Cqs+on
-00 K.
Report To: I(;---, Co ((' "{',' ':>d;, ·icr-(c.-. Lik ()~
-----6/01 6 1-(udsoVl (}}~19:_
Gc;,s-fo 1\1 ~~. rJ ( s;)[O ~,r
Address:
Date Collected:
I 6 -II -9u
Collected By:
I
~>'" four l'"\ilr'
Analysis Desired:
Laboratory Sample Sruuple Description or Remarts
Number Number
v 805623 (o-11 )/o/!Je of/)'3 ():,,.,,5 R(R/
V 9[1.-:£24 1 I Co-/1 wtn s (,,;.j_; \' "
\/ SCJ':>t>2S fo~I¥ C.r-u""le.-v d-rJl {Ji,:, PKIY
, , 305526 ( o-/c;I ((Jp \I ..h.\ 'j \I \\ t1
Results In
.
S E ATTACHED SHffT(S)
Date Received (.1.'i-"'() ,41
Date Extracted ---------
DEHNR Form 2364 Revised (9-89)
Laboratory
J
D
H
n
n
D
D
g
g
I
I
I
I
I
g
I
I
I
i
ST/\TE LASOAATORY OF PUBLIC HEAL TH
Laborato:--y No.
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. OCPAATMENT Of HUl'IAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILMINGTON ST, RI\LEIGH, N.C. 27611 9o '.[(a), j PURGEABLE CX)NPOJNDS Dale of /\na 1 ys is
COMPOUND µg/1 C\)NPOJNO
Oichlorcxlifluororethane u Chlorobenzene
Chlorcmsthane Ethvlbenzene '
v'Vinvl Chloride 1 1. 1 2-Tetrachloroethane
Bran:rrethane n-Xvlene
Ch loroethane m-Xvlene
Trichlorofluororethane o-Xvlene I
✓1 1-0ich loroethvl ene Stvrene
llelhvlene Chloride Brarofonn
tert--llutvl llethvl Ether I lbenzene ·
!Transll 2-0ichloroethvlene 1 1 2 2-Tetrachloroethane
ls 1 ether Brombenzene I
1 1-0i ch loroethane n-P~u)benzene
2.2-0ichloroorooane 1.2 3-Trichloroo,-ooane
!Cisl 1.2-Dichloroethvlene 2~hlorotoluene
Chlorofonn 1.3 5-Trimethvlbenzene
!BCMl Braroch 1 ororethane 4~h loroto 1 uene
✓1 1. I-Trichloroethane ITert) Butvl Benzene
1 1-0ichlo, ne Pentach loroethane
✓carbon Tetrachloride 1,2,4-Trimeth~lbenzene
✓Benzene ISecl Butvl Benzene
✓1.2-Dichloroethane
,, n-1 1 to 1 uerie
✓Trichloroethvlene /K 1 3-0ichlorobenzene
1 2-0ichlor~~ane IA ✓1 4-0ichlorobenzene
Bronodichlorcmsthane n-Butvlbenzene
Oibran:rrethane 1.2-0ichlorobenzene
Toluene IBisl 2 Chloroi 1 Ether
1. 1.2-Trichloroethane • I 1.2 Dibroro 3 Chloroor~ane
Tetrachloroethene I I-< 1 2 4-Trichlorobenzene
1 3-0ichlo ·ne u Hexachlorobutadiene
Oibrarochlororethane N"Mha)en,;
1.2-Dibronoethane (E08l 1-2-3-Trichlorobenzene
1 ~h 1 orohexane '
-
-
!D'tENTS:
NOL -Mininun Detection Limit for water (EP/\ llethod 502.2), is 1.0 µg/1.
J -Estimated value.
K -/\ctual value is known to be less than value given.
L -/\ctual value is known to be greater than value given.
u -Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed.
· 11 -Tentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulated voe
T -Tr1halancthane
N.C. Division of Health Services
OHS 3068-0 ( 1/89 Laboratory)
'
µg/1
I J
I
I
I ' .y
J..CtLL ..,__ ,,
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\ I
STATE LABORATORY Of PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION Of HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARTMENT Of HUIIAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
r; t J(;,J. i Laboratory No. PURGEABLE COIIPOUNOS Date of Analysis
COIIPOUND µg/1 COMPOJNO /
'
Dichlorodifluoro'Jethane .A Chlorobenzene
Chloro'Jethane Ethvlbenzene '
,tVinvl Chloride 1 1 1 2-Tetrachloroethane
Braocmethane o-Xvlene
Chloroethane m-Xvlene '
Trichlorofluoro'lethane o-Xvlene
✓1 1-0ichloroethvlene Stvrene I
llethvlene Chloride Brorofonn
tert-Butvl llethvl Ether I lbenzene 1
(Transl 1 2-0ichloroethvlene 1 1 2 2-Tetrachlo'roethane
1 1 ether Brarobenzene '
1.1-0ichloroethane n-Pronvlbenzene
2 2-0ichlo==ane 1 2 3-Trichlo=rooane
/Cisl 1.2-Dichloroethvlene 2--Chl orotol uene I
Chlorofonn 1 3 5-Trirrethvlbenzene
/BC/I) Brcm:x:hlorcmethane 4--Chlorotol uene I
✓1 1. 1-Trichloroethane llert) Butvl Benzene
l. 1-Dichlo, ne Pentachloroethane
✓carbon Tetrachloride 1,2,4-Trirreth~lbenzene
✓Benzene (Sec) Butvl Benzene
✓1 2-Dichloroethane D-I lto luene
✓Tri ch loroethvlene 1 3-0i ch lorobenzene
1 2-0ichlornnrnnane ✓1 4-Dichlorobenzene
Brorodichlorarethane n-Butvlbenzene I
Dibrcnorethane I 1 2-0ichlorobenzene
Toluene (Bis) 2 Chlorois ' 1 Ether
1. 1 2-Trichloroethane 1.2-0ibroro-3 Chloroornnane
Tetrachloroethene , 1.2.t1-Trichlorot>erlzene
1 3-0ichloroorooane Hexachlorobutadiene
Oibraroch lorcmethane I N~r,htha1ene
1.2-Dibroroethane (EOOl I 1 2 3-Trichlorobenzene
1--Ch lorohexane JI '
-
-·
M~L -Mini11U11 Detection Limit for water (EPA tlcthod 502.2), is 1.0 µg/1.
J -Estimated value.
K -Actual value is kr,own to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is kO()ri,ln to be greater than value given.
U -Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed.
1/ -Tentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulat<>d voe
T -Trthalancthane
N.C. Division of Health Services
OHS 3068-0 (1/89 Laboratory)
µg/1
u.
I!/
I
I
I
I
u
n
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·,) SlAlE LABORAlORY Of PUBLIC HEALlH
DIVISION Of HEALlH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARlMENT Of HUMAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILMINGTON Sl, RALEIGH, N.C.'27611
tJort,--12 Laboratory No. PURGEABLE COIIPCIJNDS Date of Analysis
COIIPOUND ~g/1 COIIPOUND
Dichlorodifluoranethane I Chlorobenzene
ctiloranethane Ethvlbenzene
,!Vinvl Chloride 1 1 1 2-Tetrachloroethane
Bron:methane n-Xvlene I
Ch loroethane m-Xvlene
Trichlorofluoranethane o-Xvlene
✓l 1--0ichloroethvlene Stvrene
llethvlene Chloride Brarofonn
tert-Butvl llethvl Ether I lbenzene
'Transl 1 2--0ichloroethvlene 1. 1.2 2-Tetrachloroethane
I 1 ether Brarobenzene
1. 1--0ichloroethane n-Proovlbenzene
2 2--0ichlornn=ane 1 2 3-Trichlornnrnnane
(Cisl 1 2-Dichloroethvlene 2--Ch 1 oroto 1 uene I
Chlorofonn 1 3 5-Trimethvlbenzene
IBC111 Brcm:x:h loranethane .4--Ch loroto 1 uene :
✓l 1 I-Trichloroethane !Tertl Butvl Benzene
1 1-Dichlo ne Pentachloroethane .
✓carbon Tetrachloride 1,2,4-Trimeth~lben'zene
✓Benzene ISecl Butvl Ben,ene
✓1 2-Dichloroethane 1--.,•p, n-1 ltoluenel
✓Tri ch loroethvlene IJ 1 3--0ichlorobenzene
1 2--0ichlor~=ane ✓1.4--0ichlorobenzen'e
Brarodichloranethane n-Butvlbenzene
Dibron:methane 1 2--0ichlorobenzene
Toluene IBisl 2 Chlorois 1 Ether
1 1 2-Trichloroethane 1 2--0ibroro 3 Chlo;.,.,,._r~ane
Tetrachloroethene 1 2 4-lrichlorobenzene
1 3-Dichlornnronane Hexachlorobutadiene
Dibrcrrochloranethane N•"hthalcne
l 2-Dibraroethane IEOBl 1.2 3-Trichlorobenzene
1--Ch lorohexane
-
MDL -Minirrun Detection Limit for water (EPA Method 502.2), is 1.0 ~g/1.
J -Estimated value·.
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U -l\aterial was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed.
1/ -lentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulated VOC
1 -Tnhalancthane
N.C. Division of Health Services
OHS 3068-0 ( 1/89 Laboratory)
~g/1
u
;
I
I
:
i
I
!
·v
I
I
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SlAlE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVIS IOI/ OF HEALlH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARlllENl OF HUAAN RESCIJRCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILIIINGlOII Sl, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
Laboratory No. 9J 5{,J_[., PURGEABLE COIIPCIJNDS Date of Analysis
COIIPCIJND µg/1 COIIPCIJND
Dichlorodifluoranethane " Chlor-obenzene
Chloranethane Ethvlbenzene I
,IVinvl Chloride 1 1 1 2-Tetrachloroethane
B rcm:rre thane o-Xvlene '
Ch l oroethane m-Xvlene
Trichlorofluoranethane o-Xvlene
✓l.1-Dichloroethvlene Stvrene
llethvlene Chloride Brarofonn '
tert-llutvl llethvl Ether I lbenzene
(Transl l 2-Dichloroethvlene 1 1. 2. 2-Tetrach loroethane
I 1 ether Brorobenzene
1. 1--0ichloroethane n Proovlbenzene I
2 2--0ichloroorooane 1 2.3 Trichlonv,,....;,.,ane
(Cis) 1.2--0ichloroethvlene 2-Ch loroto 1 uene ' Chlorofonn 1 . 3. 5-Tri rrethvl ben"zene
(BCII) Brarochloranethane 4-Ch loroto 1 uene I
✓1 1 1-Trichloroethane (Tert) Butvl Benzene
1. 1-Dichlo ne Pentachloroethane ,
✓carbon Tetrachloride 1,2,4-Trirreth~lbenzene
✓Benzene (Sec) Butvl Benzene
✓l 2-Dichloroethane ' D-J ltoluene,
✓Tri ch loroethvlene Ii',. 1.3-Dichlorobenzene
1 2-Dichloroorooane 11 ✓1 4--0ichlorobenzene
Brcnodichlororethane n-llutvlbenzene
Dibrorrarethane 1.2-Dichlorobenzene
lol1..1ene fBisl 2 Chlorois 1 Ether
1.1 2-Trichloroethane \ 1.2-Dibroro-3 Chlo~r ........ ane
Tetrachloroethene 1-.,.-11 / p 1 2 4-Trichlorobenzene
1.3-Dichlo ne 'J Hexachlor-obutadiene
Dibrarochloranethane N~nhthalene '
1.2-Dibraroethane (EDS) 1 2.3-Trichlorobenzene
1-Chlorohexane '
-
--
CO\'£NTS:
IIDL -llinifll..lTl Detection Limit for water (EPA Plcthod 502.2), is 1.0 µg/1.
J Estimated value.
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U -Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed.
I/ -Tentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulated voe
T -Tr1halcrncthane
N.C. Division of Health Services
WS 3068-0 ( 1/89 Laboratory)
-
µg/1
,
!
i
I
I
I
i
I ;
' I
i
I
' ' I
,(
I
I
I
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 GA~fON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
991 »'est Hudson Bou/e~•ard
Mr. Howe
2603 Davis Park Road
Gastonia, N. C. 28052
Dear Mr. Howe:
Gastonia, North Carolina 28052 Phon, (7().1)
October 3, 1990
On June 15, 1990 a water sample was taken from the1 well that
I supplies your home with drinking water. These samples were delivered to the State Laboratory for Public Health, Raleigh, N. C. for analysis.
The information furnished to our departrnent by the State Laboratory of Public health states that the foliow1ng volatile organi~•chemicals were found in the sample taken from the well that supplies your water:
1) Less than one part per billion Trichloroethylene
2) Less than one part per billion Tetrachloroethene
3) Trace of 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dr. Ken Rudo, State Toxicologist, states that these chernicals are within safe levels to drink.
If y6u have any questions concerning your drinking water, please feel free to contact our office at 853-5200 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday thro,ugh Friday.
Sincerely,
./!?-f
Boyce P. Hunt, R. s.
Sanitarian Supervisor
Environmental health Division
BPH/lp
I
g
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1
GASTON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
I
99/ West Huds~n Boulrvard
WGAS
627 Davis Park Road
Gastonia, N. c. 28052
Dear Sir:
Ga,tonia, North Carolina 18051 Phan, (704)
October 3, 1990
On June 15, 1990 a water sample was taken from the well that supplies your radio station with drinking water. These samples were delivered to the State Laboratory for Public Health, Raleigh, N. C. for analysis.
The information furnished to our department by t~e State Laboratory of Public health states that was no volatile organic chemicals were found in the sample taken from the well that suppli'es your water.
Dr. Ken Rudo, State Toxicologist, states that your water is within safe levels to drink.
If you have any questions concerning your drinking water, please feel free to contact our office at 853-5200 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Sincerely, /
/ ~1-,.r-11~(2'.(
oy e P. Hunt, R. S.
Sanitarian Supervisor
Environmental health Division
BPH/lp
I
I
I
I
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1
GASTON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEAi.TH
991 Wtst Hudson Boultvard
Mr. Crumley
2723 Davis Park Road
Gastonia, N. C. 28052
Dear Mr. Crumley:
Gastonia, North Carolina 28052 Phon, (704)
October 3, 1990
On June 15, 1990 a water sample was taken from the well that
supplies your home with drinking water. These samples were
delivered to the State Laboratory for Public Health,
Raleigh, N. C. for analysis.
The information furnished to our department by the State
Laboratory of Public health states that the foll6wing volatile
organi~ chemicals were found in the sample takenifrom the well
that supplies your water:
1) Trace of 1,2-Dichloroethane
Dr. Ken Rudo, State Toxicologist, states that these chemicals ar~
within safe levels to drink.
If you have any questions concerning your drinking water, please
feel free to contact our office at 853-5200 between the hours of
8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
)25
Boyce P. Hunt R. S.
Sanitarian Supervisor
Environmental health Division
BPH/lp
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.)
GASTON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
991 West Hucfson Boulevard
Mr. Coe
2212 .Davis Park Road
Gastonia, N. C. 28052
Dear Mr. Coe:
Gastonia, North Carolina ]805] Phont (704)
October 3, 1990
On June 15, 1990 a water sample was taken from the well that
supplies your home with drinking water. These samples were
delivered to the State Laboratory for Public Health,
Raleigh, N. C. for analysis.
The information furnished to our department by the State
Laboratory of Public health states that the following volatile
organi~ chemicals were found in the sample taken from the well
that supplies your water:
1) Less than one part per billion Trichloroethylene
2) Trace of Tetrachloroethene
Dr. Ken Rudo, State Toxicologist, states that these chemicals are
within safe levels to drink.
If you have any questions concerning your drinking water, please
feel free to contact our office at 853-5200 between the hours of
8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.
~~~L+
Boyce P. Hunt, R. S.
Sanitarian Supervisor
Environmental health Division
BPH/lp
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health and Natural Resources ,J,_:;.' :: ~ 199[)
Division of Laboratory Services
State Laboratory of Public Health SL!Pi:RF/JND SECTl(H\'
P.O. Box 28047, Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Environmental Sciences Analysis Report
Name of Owner, Patient/:_ ,;.
or Supply: · Li!:1.5 LC!')
Address:
County: c;...as±oh , .
Repoet To: '?7,c<' J/4n-r-Qffe" (o. Liiv f/t'q)/~
Address: 9Y J lJ. f/u,dSaYJ i3)vC'/
GQ51?i~ 1·0 u :> £PS"').
Date Collected:
Collected By:
Analysis Desired:
Laboratory Sample Sample Description or Remarks
Number Number
SOS!.\79 Cf)-// ff ow/on c/
sas.,1so /1(J -/) f;..0, d //VI. "1
-905°181 ru-l J h-Jr tv,-er
905-182 Co-JtJ (' l'fnc:hr,. 1
905..t83 ('o-/( --rc,,-re_
Results In
SiEATTACHEO 9HUJ,
'
Date Received /4-1-90 IA Date Reported l,-1
/ g__-'l O
.
Date Extracted Date Analyzed ----------
DEHNR Form 2364 Revised (9-89)
Laborator·y
Reported By:
. I
I
I
n
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"") STATE LABOOATOOY a' PUBLIC HEALTH \
DIVISION Ot . .iALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARlPIENT a' IUl"ol--.ESOORCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILHINGTON Sl, RALEIGH, N.C:' 27611
.
Laboratory No. 9a 'ff 79 PURGEABLE COIIPOONDS Date of Analysis
COIIPOOND )Jg/1 COHPOOND '
Dichlorodifluorarethane II Chlorobenzene
Chlorarethane Ethvlbenzene
-tVinvl Chloride l l. 1 2-Tetrachloroethane
sraranethane o-Xvlene
Ch loroethane m-Xvlene
Trichlorofluorarethane o-Xvlene
✓1. 1-Dichloroethvlene Stvrene
Plethvlene Chloride Braoofonn
tert-Butvl Plethvl Ether I lbenzene
(Transl 1 2-Dichloroethvlene
I 1 ether
l. 1.2 2-Tetrachloroethane
Braoobenzene I
1 1-Dichloroethane n-P~"lbenzene
2 2-Dichlo, ane 1.2 3-Trichlor-oorooane
(Cisl l 2-Dichloroethvlene 2-Chlorotoluene
Chlorofonn l. 3 5-Trimethvlbenzene
CBCH) Braroch lorarethane ' 4-Chlorotoluene I
✓1 1 1-Trichloroethane ..1..V-fl A.0, ITertl Butvl Benzene
1. 1-Dichlo ne • l Pentachloroethane '
✓carllon Tetrachloride 1. 2 4-Trimethvlbenzene
✓Benzene /Seel Butvl Benzene,
✓1 2-Dichloroethane D-l 1 to 1 uene
✓Trichloroethvlene 1 3-Dichlorobenzene·
1.2-Dichloroorooane .rl 4-Dichlorobenzene
Brorn:>dichlorarethane n-Butvlbenzene
Dibrooonethane l 2-Dichlorobenzene,
Toluene (Bis) 2 Chlorois 1 Ether
1 1 2~Trichloroethane 1.2-Dibraoo-3 Chloennr~ane
Tetrachloroethene 1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene
l 3-Dichlo~r-ane Hexachlorobutadiene
Dibraroch lorarethane N>nhthalene
1 2-Dibraroethane IEDBl ' 1 2 3-Trichlorobenzene
1-Chlorohexane .
CD'l1ENTS:
HDL -Hinil!UTI Detection Limit for water (EPA Method 502.2), is 1.0 )Jg/1.
J -Estimated value.
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
u -Haterial was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed.
1/ -Tentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulated voe
T -Tr1halaocthanc
N.C. Division of Health Services
OHS 3068--D ( 1/89 Laboratory)
)Jg/1
I J
' I
I
a
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
""-
.) STATE l.ABOOATORY O" PUBLIC HEALTH ,) •
DIVISION, HEI\LTH SERVICES, N.C. IJEPAA1PIEN1 O" HUI....., RES<XJRCES
P.O. BOX 28041 -306 N. WILMINGTON Sl, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
Laboratory No • .i!Jrf :?o PURGEABLE COIIPOONOS Date of Analysis
-
COMPOUND )Jg/l CONPOUND I
'
Dich lorodi fluon:rnethane , Ch 1 orobenzene ' Chlon:rnethane Ethvlbenzene
vVinvl Chloride l l 1 2-Tetrachloroethane
Brmorethane o-Xvlene
Chloroethane m-Xvlene
Trichlorofluon:rnethane o-Xvlene
✓l. 1-0ichloroethvlene Stvrene
Plethvlene Chloride BrCJrofonn
tert-Butvl Plethvl Ether I !benzene I
(Transl l 2-0ichloroethylene l, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
L l ether Braoobenzene '
l. 1-0ichloroethane n-Proovlbenzene
2. 2-0i ch lo.-nn.-nnane 1.2 3-Trichlo ane
(Ci sl l.2-0i ch loroethvlene 2--Ch lorotoluene I
Chlorofonn l 3 5-Trinv:,thvlben.iene
(BC/I) Brcm:x:h l on:rnethane 4--Chlorotoluene ' ' ✓l. 1 I-Trichloroethane +rnt1e. (Tertl Butvl Benzene
1.1-0ichlo ne ) l Pentachloroethane I
✓carbon Tetrachloride l 2 4-Trinv:,thvlbenzene
✓Benzene (Seel Butvl Benzene
✓l.2-Dichloroethane p-I ltoluene I
✓Tri ch loroethvlene l 3-0ichlorobenzene,
1.2-0ichloroornnane ✓l,4-Dichlorobenzene '
Brcmodichlon:rnethane n-Butvlbenzene '
Dibrmorethane 1.2-Dichlorobenzene
Toluene (Bis) 2 Chlorois l Ether 1 1 2-Trichloroethane 1.2-Dibromo-3 Chloroornnane
Tetrachloroethene 1,2 4-Trichlorobenzene
1.3-Dichloroorooane Hexachlorobutadiene '
Dibrcm:x:hlon:rnethane N>nhthalene
1.2 Dibraroethane (EDB) l 2 3 Trichlorobenzene
1--Ch 1 orohexane ' '
COl9'ENTS:
MDL -Mininun Detection Limit for water (EPA Plethod 502.2), is 1.0 )Jg/1.
J -Estimated value. .
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U -Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NI\ -Not analyzed.
1/ -Tentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulatcd voe
1 -Tr1halarcthane
N.C. Division of Health Services OHS 3068-0 ( 1/89 Laboratory)
)Jg/1
,,
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
0
H
I
I
I
I
I
I
---, STATE I.ABOOATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH 1
OIVISI()j l,,. rlEALTH SERVICES, N.C. OEPAAT11ENT OF 1-U,._. RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILMINGT()j ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
laboratory No. 9o 5 /,g I PURGEABLE COIIPOUNDS Da ~e of Ana 1 ys is
COIIPOUND )Jg/1 COIIPOUND 1
Dichlorodifluoranethane , Chlorobenzene ' Chloranethane Ethvlbenzene
A'invl Chloride l l 1 2-Tetrachloroethane
Braranethane o-Xvlene
Ch loroethane m-Xvlene
Trichlorofluoranethane o-Xylene I
✓1. 1--Dichloroethvlene Stvrene
llethvlene Chloride Braoofonn I
tert--Butvl llethvl Ether I ]benzene
(Transl 1.2-Dich loroethylene 1, 1.2 2-Tetrachloroethane
I 1 ether Brarobenzene ' 1. l...lJichloroethane n-Proovlbenzene ' 2 2...IJichlornnrnnane 1 2 3-Trichloroorooane
(Cisl 1 2-Dichloroethvlene 2--Ch lorotol uene ' Chlorofonn 1 3 5-Trimethvlbenzene
(BC/1) Braooch loranethane 4--Ch 1 oroto 1 uene
✓L L 1-Trichloroethane ITert) Butvl Benzene
1. l...lJichlo ne Pentachloroethane I
✓carbon Tetrachloride 1,2,4-Trimethvlbenzene
✓Benzene {Seel Butvl Benzene
✓1-2-Dichloroethane D-I<:nnroovl toluene I
✓Trich loroethvl ene 1 3...IJichlorobenzene
1.2-Dichlornn.-nnane ' ✓1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Brarodichloranethane n-Butvlbenzene ! Dibraranethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene
Toluene (Bis) 2 Chlorois ' 1 Ether l l 2cTrichloroethane 1 2-Dibraoo 3 Chloroornnane
Tetrachloroethene 1,2 4-Trichlorobeniene
1.3-Di ch loroornnane Hexachlorobutadiene
Dibraoochloranethane Nanhthalene
1.2 Dibraroethane (EDB) 1, 2 ,3-Tri ch lorobenzene
1--Chlorohexane ' I I
ML -Mini1TUTI Detection Limit for water (EPA llethod 502.2), is 1.0 µg/1.
J -Estimated value.
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
u -Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed. .
1/ -Tentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulated VOC
T -TrthalCJTlC'thane
N.C. Division of Health Services
UHS 3068-0 (1/89 Laboratory)
µg/1
IA
I ..y
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-1 STATE l.ABOOATORY Of PUBLIC HEALTH 1 I
Laboratory No.
DIVISION •. HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPAA1P1ENT Of flJ. •• , RESOURCES P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
!JcJ,218/2 PUlGEABLE COIIPWNOS Date of Analysis ?/11;&/2
COMPOUND JJg/1 ' COMPOUND
Dichlorodifluorarethane ' Ch 1 oroben zene Chlorarethane Ethvlbenzene ' ' v'Vinvl Chloride 1. 1. 1.2-Tetrachloroethane Brcm:m,thane n-Xvlene
Ch loroethane m-Xvlene ' Trichlorofluorarethane o-Xvlene
✓1 1-Dichloroethvlene Stvrene
Plethvlene Chloride Brarofonn
tert-Butvl llethvl Ether I !benzene {Transl 1.2-Di ch loroethvlene 1 1 2 2-Tetrachloroethane
I 1 ether I Braoobenzene
l 1-Dichloroethane -J.-r /}. C. -'?_; n-P~vlbenzene
2 2-Di ch Jornnrnnane /J 1 2.3-Trichlo=rnnane
ICisl 1 2-Dichloroethvlene .f 2-Chlorotoluene
Chlorofonn Mf1flµ 7 1 3.5-Trirrethvlbeniene
IBCltl Brarochlorarethane J 4-Chlorotoluene
✓l. 1.1-Trichloroethane ITertl Butvl Benzene
1 1-Dichlo ne Pentachloroethane I ✓carbon Tetrachloride 1 2 4-Trirrethvlbenzene
✓Benzene !Seel Butvl Benzene ✓1.2-0ichloroethane ' D-1 !toluene ; ✓Tri ch loroethvlene I '1 ' 1 3-0ichlorobenzene
l 2-0ichlo ane I J ✓1 4-0ichlorobenzene Brarodichlorarethane n-Butvlbenzene Oibrcm:m,thane 1.2-0ichlorobenzene
Toluene (Bis) 2· Chlorois 1 Ether 1 1.2-Trichloroethane 1 2-Dibraro-3 Chloroor=ane Tetrachloroethene I k 1 2.4-Trichlorobenzene 1 3-0ichlornn..,,,,ane I Hexachlorobutadiene
Dibraoochlorarethane N•nhthalene
1 2-Dibroooethane (EDB\ I 1 2 3-Trichlorobenzene
1-Chlorohexane '
CO'l1ENTS:
MOL -MinilTUTI Detection Limit for water (EPA Plethod 502.2), is 1.0 JJg/1.
J -Estimated value. K -Actual value is known to be less than value given. L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given. U -Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed. 1/ -Tentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulated VOC T -Tr1halCJTICthane
N.C. Division of Health Services OHS 3068-0 (1/89 Laboratory)
jJg/1
I ,
,
"
.JsTATE LABOAATOOY a' PUBLIC HEALTH ··1
DIVISION a' hcALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARlllENT a' lf.JIIAN KESCXJRCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILIIINGlON Sl, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Laboratory No. ~1/j_;)-f'._i_ff__-,_1_ PURGEABLE COIIPOJNDS Date of Anaiysis
COHPOOND µg/1 COHPOOND
-Dichlorodifluoranethane 11 Chlorobenzene
Chloranethane Ethvlbenzene
v'Vinvl Chloride 1 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
Braranethane o-Xvlene
Ch 1 oroethane m-Xylene
Trichlorofluorarethane o-Xvlene
-11 1-0ichloroethvlene Styrene
Hethvlene Chloride Branofonn
tert-Sutvl Hethvl Ether I !benzene
/Transl 1. 2-Di ch loroethvlene 1. 1 2 2-Tetrachloroethane
Isrv,.-nnvl ether Braoobenzene
1 1-Dichloroethane n prnnvJbenzene
2.2-Dichloroorooane 1.2 3-Trichlo~~ane
rcisl 1 2-Dichloroethvlene 2-{;h lorotol uene
Chloroform . 1 3.5-Trirrethvlbenzene
CBCltl Braoochlorarethane . 4-{;hlorotoluene
-11. 1. 1 Trichloroethane +,-;il'I'.--Clert) Butvl Benzene I
1 1-Dichlo 'ne " Pentachloroethane
✓Carbon Tetrachloride 1 2 4-Trirrethvlbenzene
✓Benzene (Sec) Butvl Benzene I
-11.2-Dichloroethane D-I !toluene I
-IT rich loroethvlene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene I
1 2-Dichloroorooane -11.4-Dichlorobenzene
Brooodichlorcmethane n-Butvlbenzene I
Dibraranethane 1.2-Di ch lorobenzene ' Toluene (Bis) 2 Chlorois 1 Ether 1.1.2-Trichloroethane 1.2-Dibrano-3 Chlo~r~ane
Tetrachloroethene 1 2 4-Trichlorob<enzene 1 3-Dichlornnrnnane Hexachlorobutadiene I
Dibraoochlorarethane Naohthalene
1 2-Dibroooethane (EDB) 1 2.3-Trichlorobenzene
1-{;hlorohexane I
I C091ENTS:
I HDL -llininun Detection Limit for water (EPA Hethod 502.2), is 1.0 µg/l.
I J -Estimated value.
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U -llaterial was analyzed for but not detected.
I NA -Not analyzed. 1/ -Tentative identification.
-I -Re~ulated voe
I
I
T -Tr1halcmcthane
N.C. Division of Health Services
OHS 3068..0 (1/89 Laboratory)
-
µg/1
I.A
' .
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH I
991 West Hudson Boulevard Gastonia, North Carolina 28052 Phone (704)
Ms Glenda Rowland
2347 .Hedgewood Circle
Gastonia, N. C. 28052
Dear Ms. Rowland:
853-5200
On June 1, 1990 a water sample was taken from the well that
supplies your home with drinking water. These samples were
delivered to the State Laboratory for Public Health,
Raleigh, N. C. for analysis.
The information furnished to our department by the State
Laboratory of Public Health states that the followiryg volatile
organic chemicals were found in the sample taken from the well
that supplies your water.
1) Trace of 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Dr. Ken Rudo, State Toxicologist, states that these chemicals are
within safe levels to drink.
If you have any questions concerning your drinking water, please
feel free to contact our office at 853-5200 between the hours of
8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
Boyce P. Hunt, R. S.
Supervisor
Environmental Health Division
BPH/lp
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
')
GASTON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
I 99/ Wtst Hudson Boulei·ard Gastonia, North Carolina 180513 5-3 -f5/;p!JQ(70.f)
Mr. W. L. Godwin
2231 Davis Park Road Gastonia, N. C. 28052
Dear Mr. Godwin:
On June 1, 1990 a water sample was taken from the well that supplies your home with drinking water. These samples were delivered to the State Laboratory for Public Health, Raleigh, N. C. for analysis.
The information furnished to our department by th~ State Laboratory of Public Health states that the following vo]atile organic chemicals were found in the sample taken from the well that supplies your water.
1) Trace of 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Dr. Ken Rudo, State Toxicologist, states that these chemicals are within safe levels to drink.
If you have any questions concerning your drinking water, please feel free to contact our office at 853-5200 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
Boyce P. Hunt, R. S. Supervisor
Environmental Health Division
BPH/lp
R
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"i \
GASTON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
991 West Hudson Boulei•ard
June 22, 1990
Ms. Shirley Fortner
2717 Davis Park Road
Gastonia, N. C. 28052
Dear Ms. Fortner:
Gastonia, l\'orth Carolina 18051 Phone (704)
On May 24, 1990 a water sample was taken from the well that supplies your home with drinking water. These samples were delivered to the State laboratory for Public Health, . . I Raleigh, N. C. for analysis.
The information furnished to our department by the State Laboratory of Public Health states that NO VOLATILE ORGANIC CHEMICALS were found in the sample taken from the well that suppli~s your home.
Due to the possible changes in the quality of your well w~ter, the Gaston County Health Department will resample your water in six to twelve months.
If you have any questions concernina your drinking water, please feel free to contact our office at isJ-5204 between ~he hours of 8:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m.
Sincerely,
Boyce P. Hunt, R. S.
Sanitarian Supervisor
BPH/lp
I
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
··1 f~~ GASTON COUNTY ENnNQNMENWHEAUH < .,,,,._ >
" W' t-A. 991 West Hudson Boulel'ard Gastonia, North Carolina 280518 5-3-~~{)(lM) =~ 846 Cr '
June 22, 1990
Mr. John Crenshaw
2816 Davis Park Road
Gastonia, N. C. 28052
Dear Ms. Crenshaw:
On June 1, 1990 a water sample was taken from the well that supplies your home with drinking water. These samples were delivered to the State Laboratory for Public Healt~, Raleigh, N. C. for analysis.
The information furnished to our department by the State Laboratory of Public Health states that the following volatile organic chemtcals were found in the sample taken from the well that supplies your water.
1) Trace of 1,1-Dichloroethane
2) Trace of Chloroform
3) 1.2 parts per billion Trichloroethylene
4) Less than one parts per billion Tetrachloroethene
Dr. Ken Rudo, State Toxicologist, states that these chemicals are within safe levels to drink.
If you have any questions concerning your drinking water, please feel free to contact our office at 853-5200 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m: Monday through Friday.
Sincerely,
Boyce P. Hunt, R. S.
Supervisor
Environmental Health Division
BPH/lp
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
cou.v~
~ • * t
'·1
GASTON COUNTY
\
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH r~~
~ 846 Cr
991 Wtst Hudson Boult~·ard Gastonia, Norrh_Caro/ina 280523 5·3-~{/70-I)
June 22, 1990
Mr. Tarte
2501 Briaroak
Gastonia, N. C. 28052
Dear Mr. Tarte:
On June 1, 1990 a water sample was taken from the well that supplies your home with drinking water. These samples were delivered to the State Laboratory for Public Health, Raleigh, N. C. for analysis.
The information furnished to our department by the State Laboratory of Public Health states that the following volatile organic chemicals were found in the sample taken from the well that s~pplies your water.
1) Trace of 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Dr. Ken Rudo, State Toxicologist, states that these chemicals are within safe levels to drink.
If you have any questions concerning your drinking 'water, please feel free to contact our office at 853-5200 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday,
Sincerely,
Boyce P. Hunt, R. S.
Supervisor
Environmental Health Division
BPH/lp
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Laboratory Services
State Laboratory of Public Health
P.O. Box 28047, Raleigh, N.C. 27bll
Environmental Sciences Analysis Report
Name of Owner/) ~~~ienA ,/it,~
or Supply: ~ IJAr'k /g__ -!!r _ ·
' Address : /J/1'1,,0 &wt ti -7'4f?½ui, ·
County: Crirbn
Date Collected: (;,?22 -5-15---90
Collected By:
Analysis Desired: J/,OC.
Laboratory Sample Sample Description
Number Number -
or Remarks Results
·tttt;l:.I V ED
MA'( 2 9 1990
SUPERFUNO SECTION ·
In
_J 90.531'", Co-, '!.'. ~ /0-;P I • • ,
·--/.1,f-//,', 11..L tU -· t /}, Ax,
\ ..
/
905318
A . II A.
, I
' ,,.. n-tJ '?.. ,/;;.
,, ,_,_, ;1~ J?,) 'I Cbuv-r
905319 r n-5,1 ~ /JM-fu... ' .J
--,, .II ·-•. • .t1,.yf /1, ,, oil..
·-I
s E ATTACHED SHEET(S)
Date Received s·-/6-'10 dA Date Reported ,,..,,.-........,.~-o,-'-----
Date Extracted _________ Date Analyzed '-1-'"",l.l!R;.:'¥-'S:fL-,:.,.-----
DEHNR Form 2364 Revised (9-89)
Laboratory /
. ' ' ' I I I I' .
Reported By:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
., ') ~ STATE LABORATORY Of PUBLIC HEAL TH
DIVISION Of HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARTMENT Of HU11AN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 2i5ll
Laboratory No. 9053/1 PU!GEABLE CONPaJNDS Date of Analysis
' COIIPOUND \Jg/1 COIIPOUND
Oichlorodifluorarethane u Chlorobenzene ' Chlorarethane Ethvlbenzene .
vVinvl Chloride 1. 1 1 2-Tetrachloroethane
Brmonethane o-Xvlene
Ch loroethane m-Xvlene
Trichlorofluorarethane o-Xvlene
✓l. 1-0ichloroethvlene Stvrene
llethvlene Chloride BrCJOOfonn
tert-Butvl llethvl Ether Jcnnrnnvlbenzene ' flransl 1 2-0ichloroethvlene 1. 1 2.2-Tetrachloroethane
I l ether Braoobenzene
l 1-0ichloroethane n prnnv]benzene
2.2-0ichloroorooane 1,2,3-Trichlcronronane
fCisl l 2-Dichloroethvlene 2-Ch lorotoluene '
Chlorofonn l 3 5-Trimethvlbenzene
IBCMl Braroch lorarethane 4-Chlorotoluene '
✓1. 1. 1-Trichloroethane (Tert) Butvl Benzene
1 1-Dichlo ne Pentachloroethane ' I
✓carbon Tetrachloride 1,2,4-Trimeth~lbenzene
✓Benzene / (Seel Butvl Benzene:
✓l.2-Dichloroethane ' o-1 <nnroov l toluene
✓Tri ch loroethvlene /,, ' l3 l 3-Dichlorobenzene'
1.2-Dichlor~rnnane II ✓1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Brarodichlorarethane n-Butvlbenzene
Dibrararethane 1.2-Dichlorobenzene •
Toluene (Bis) 2 Chloroisnnr,;,,vl Ether
1. 1.2-Trichloroethane ' I 1.2-Dibrcmo-3 Chlornnrnnane
Tetrachloroethene tr-I'"<>, 1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene
1 3-Dichlornnrnnane " Hexachlorobutadiene
Dibrarochlorarethane Nanhthalene
1 2-Dibraroethane (EOO) l 2 3-Trichlorobenze'ne
1-Ch l orohexane \ I
caPIEHTS:
HDL -Hinirr1J11 Detection Limit for water (EPA llethod 502.2), is 1.0 \Jg/1.
J -Estimated value. K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U -Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed.
l/ -Tentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulated VOC
T -Tr1hal<Jl'Cthane
N.C. Division of Health Services
OHS 3068•-0 ( l/89 Laboratory)
s/10/90 I I
\Jg/1
/J
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STATE LABORATORY a' PUBLIC HEALTH
Laboratory No.
DIVISION vt HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPAATPIENT a' f«.JIIAN RESCXJRCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILPIINGTOH ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611 9() j,3 / S1 ru!GEABLE COPIPUJNDS Dat~ of Analysis
COPIPOUND µg/1 COPIPOUND
Dichlorodifluorarethane Ch 1 oroben zene
Chlorarethane Ethvlbenzene I
vVinvl Chloride 1. 1. 1 2-Tetrachloroethane
Broom-ethane n-Xvlene
Ch loroethane m-Xvlene
Trichlorofluorarethane o-Xvlene
✓1 1-0ichloroethvlene Stvrene
Plethvlene Chloride Braroform
tert-8utv1 Plethvl Ether I !benzene
(Transl l. 2-0i ch loroethvlene 1. 1.2.2 Tetrachloroethane
I l ether Braoobenzene '
1. l-Oichloroethane n Proovlbenzene
2.2-0ichlo~~ane . 1 2 3-Trichlo~~ane
!Cisl 1.2-Dichloroethvlene 9,5( 2~hlorotoluene
Chloroform +t-t}A ') ,1 7 1 3 5-Trimethvlbenzene
fBCPll Brorrochlorarethane II 4~h 1 oroto 1 uene '
✓l. l. !-Trichloroethane <Tertl Butvl Benzene:
l l-Dichlor ne Pentachloroethane
✓carbon Tetrachloride 1,2,4-Trimeth~lbenzene
✓Benzene !Seel Butvl Benzene
✓l 2-Dichloroethane . D-I ltoluene
✓Tri ch loroethvlene 11,1,, " l.3-Dichlorobenzene I
l 2-Dichlor~~ane /). ✓1 4-0ichlorobenzene
Brarodichlorcmethane n-Butvlbenzene ' Di broom-ethane 1.2-Dichlorobenzene
Toluene (Bis) 2 Chlorois---.. 1 Ether
1. 1 2-Trichloroethane l.2-Dibraro 3 Chloroor~ane
Tetrachloroethene -1--,--a.c..,e_, l.2.4 Trichlorobenzene
1.3-Dichloroor~ane u. Hexachlorobutadiene I
Dibrorrochlorarethane Nanhthalene
l .2-0ibroroethane fEDBl 1 2 3-Trichlorobenzene
l~hlorohexane
catENTS:
KOL -Plininun Detection Limit for water-(EPA Plethod 502.2), is 1.0 µg/1.
J -Estimated value.
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
u -Katerial was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed.
1/ -Tentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulated voe
T -Tr1halonethane
N.C. Division of Health Services
OHS 3068-0 (1/89 Laboratory)
µg/l
,1
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~·, STATE I.A80RATORY Of PUBLIC HEALTH -I
DIVISION "HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARTPIENT Of tL .. , RESCXJRCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILIIIl\'GTON S1, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611 • / /_
9053/9 PUlGEABLE COIIPOJNOS Date of Analysis ~;1/~/PO Laboratory No.
COIIPOJNO µg/1 COIIPOJNO
Oichlorodifluoranethane ). Ch 1 oroben zene
Chlorcrnethane Ethvlbenzene
v'Vinvl Chloride l L 1.2-Tetrachloroethane
erararethane n-Xvlene
Chloroethane m-Xvlene
Trichlorofluoranethane o-Xvlene
✓l. 1-Dichloroethvlene Stvrene
Methvlene Chloride Braoofonn
tert-Sutvl Methvl Ether I ]benzene
(Transl 1 2-Dichloroethvlene 1 1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane
I l ether Braoobenzene
1. 1-Dichloroethane n-Proovlbenzene
2. 2-Di ch lo, ane l 2 3-Trichlo~~ane
(Cis) 1 2-Dichloroethvlene I 2-Ch lorotol uene I
Chlorofonn jk -r 1 3 5-Trimethvlbenzene
(BCII) Bn:mxhloranethane 11 4-Ch lorotol uene I
✓l. l. I-Trichloroethane CTertl Butvl Benzene·
1.1-Dichlo ne Pentachloroethane
✓carbon Tetrachloride 1.2.4-Trimethvlbenzene
✓Benzene {Seel Butvl Benzene I
{l,2-Dichloroethane D-Is ltoluene ' ✓Tri ch loroethvlene 1 3-0ichlorobenzene
1.2-0ichlor~~ane ✓l 4-0ichlorobenzene
Bro-oodichloromethane n-Butvlbenzene ' Dibrararethane 1 2-0ichlorobenzene I
Toluene lBisl 2 Chlorois 1 Ether
1 l 2-Trichloroethane 1 2-0ibrano 3 Chloronr~ane
Tetrachloroethene 1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene
1 3-0ichlo~~ane Hexachlorobutadiene
Oibn:mxhloranethane N•nhthalene '
1 2-Dibranoethane IEOBl I 1 2 3-Trichlorobenzene
1-Ch l orohexane
,
IIOL -llininun Detection Limit for water (EPA Method 502.2), is 1.0 µg/1.
J -Estimated value.
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U -llaterial was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed.
1/ -Tentative identification.
·✓ -Re~ulatcd voe
T -Tr1halarcthanc
N.C. Division of Health Services
OHS 3068-0 ( 1/89 Laboratory)
µg/1
IA
,
'
Report to: ARO. FnoG, ARO. V✓aRO, '.'/iRO,
WSRO. K111~1on FO Other ________ _
Shipped IJy: 8us.~u~1 Other r-·-
COLLECTOR[S): i• Y /)c./l;_.~
FIELD ANALYSES
pfl ,I 00 ____ Soec. Cond. 94
N.C.
Location or site
;r.,,,.--=10.10 ----oc Odor _______ _ Oescrip!ion of sampling point
,carance ______ _ Taste ______ _ Samo!ino /.lethod
Field Analysis By:--------------Ren,arks
LABORATORY ANALYSES
BOO!, J ,0 moll 01.B. Soll ds 70JOO mi;i/1
GOO "1 or, J t I) n,011 J"lunrllln ll'., I ,ng/J
coo LO• J J !, ' mo/J tUrdn~ss:ToUI 000 ,r, OIi
C<Jllrv,m;l.<I I p,:.,i,I J 16 16 / IUOml Haruna~s (non·carb) ,o, moll
Co!llo..rm:~F Toul J \ !,Q~ /l00m1 Phenols Jl7 JO UQ/1
TOr;. <ao moil ~ Sgecrj£l"F.cOV5 ~ AT\Jll.\l,.1.1nos/cm i
l urbido ly '5 /HlJ Sul ,:J(.1ES11lll~CES }.;\ i.) moll --........ cp,QL\/;<IH ;,_,~-. \ :.:.c. ~-. ,,. moll
oH 'u J uni ls jUN U 0 i;J;JU
r A I< iltn1 l)' JO 011 u "' mi;i/1
A. I~ & I in, I y ,, OH e. J "5 r.>9 /I ....
CHbC'n&IP "5 mQ/1 H *~i,n.~ or ll1'i\~~·ri1i1Eii.i::l :a,.n•.G'Ji:111
1--j..),\Ol)Pr~Vll I• REGJDijAL Utt1o,
BiCl(<,Onel• "' mtr II NHJ " N 5" mo11
ArsPnic:Total 10oz UQ/1 TKN " N 5'5 moll
(;ution J10dde "' men N02 • NOJ " N 6,0 moll
C.:hlo,ide 9~0 mtr/1 P: T Ol~J " ' 555 mtr/1
Chromium:Her IOJ 2 uo/1
coror:T,u-e eo P!•Co
C1 I nld1 no mtJ/1
LAB NUMBER 8 L'G l/64=
DATE RECEIVED 5 /?, /9() Trme<;:r:zsr~ . ~=:-{ J ,,....--~ Rec d byJ-~~'__)="---From: Su~~
Other CKrss DATA ENTRY GY: _ffl'-'-'--"-----
DA TE RE r o RTE D: _,~5_-~3L\~--G-"\ Q..,_ ___ _
(pumping
I~\·:. ,!\("V'\ AO Silver \ 07 7 . ug/1
Al .\luml"""' ! IQ!, uo/1
B• 8~rlum \{'0 1 uo/1
C• Calcium "5 m11/I
\-A* thoc hi otl ~!\IP• lll c Id.">-/"'
O;oan~:,lt,,,.,, Pe,11cl<1tt {'] )\J\'\
\\'J'~)[\\[°K J~U
Ac1S,'~l:\J,\: du rir..\-\ I'\ l, L· c, Caomium 1 0 2 7 uo/1 \',I\L~'
Ch1omium:To11I 1 OJ~ uo JI :< 8 1 se I ,',J. u I' I I E. rr IC I I Cl. Oro• nlc,
Co Coooe, 10,2 UO/! x AC id E,1,act1ble Oroanlcs
F, Iron 10◄5 vo/!
"' l.le,cu,y 7 1 9 00 uo/1 V Puroe1bl• 0,01nlcs (VOA. bo1ile)
' Potassium 93, moll
I.IO · 1.la,;,nesium ,,, mo/I 1,2 · Oit:,romoe1h1ne (EOB)
!Jn · 1.!~noanese 1055 uo/1 ,,, Sod,um "' mo/I ;<. ,Cf.
Mi Ni c~ cl 1067 UQ/1
" Lead 1 05 I uo/1
s, Se I en, um 11 ◄

1

uo/1
-'.l ~"'
~ :, ATTAC\-\t.U v•~· ~-,, i'.,nc 1091 uo/l ANALIJI.J 1,l-•·v '' ..
GW·';4 [l('vi•-ed 7/H'.J f-'or Oissolver1 Analvsi~ -sui,:-nil fil!r.rcrl S:]rnrilc :>r1r. v•ritn ·n,s· ... 1-1,._-,. ----------lillll ---liiiiiiil --
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAB t-0.
REPORTED BY
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SUPERYIS1JR
SAMPLE TYPE:
STORET ~.
SEMl¥0U,TILE ORGANIC REPORT
OC404
"-ifl1 f) ENTERED BY
""-, yY\ CHECKED BY
lrl7 j
9?c.K DATE~
SEDIMENT
ANALYSIS RES UL TS
COMPOUND
l«J BASE/~EUTP.ALS OR ACID EXTPJ.CTABLE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS DETECTED BY GC/MS.
DA
Q)
~ J
CONCEtfTRATION
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAB 00.
REPORTED BY
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SUPERVISJR
SAMPLE TYPE:
.· STORIT HO.
' '
VOLATILE ANALYTICAL REPORT
W404
M ENTERED BY 00:: ~ CHECKED BY D 5·
_/1.L~
Cl(tt: DATE 43~/c;~
SEDIMENT
ANALYSIS RESULTS
COMPOUND CONCEIHRATION
NO VOLATILE ORGANICC'JMPOUNDS DETECTED BY GC/ELCD/PI D.
co1.n-1ry N.C.
OU All tJQ. ;Y70q SERIAL tJ(). -,
l.AT.~.5'
0 /3 1
' ' I '
Reoon ·10: AP.O. FnoG. ARO. WaAO. WiRO.
WSRO. Kinzlon FO Other ________ _
Shipped by: Bus.~, Oiher ________ _
COLLECTOR{S)· 0 (? f-2,,-__ ,/ .?/ DATE 5 / ·// .'?0
DEPA MENT OF NATUf'.1\c RESOURCES
& COMMUNITY DEVFLOPMENT ~
DEM ( .
CROe1f'au!r orocusf ob v .
0 ROUTINE O EMER~E1'CY ;/11 ,/
Tl !.IE ---------PURPOS!:: er,S[Llr.JE, ~011.PLAl(·l]:)
---( Cl re I C
LAB NUMBER 8 t-;e Yo 3
DAT~ RECEIVE~Z)So r;me 9w)
Rec d byv From: Bu~~
0 lhcr
DATA ENTRY GY: 00 CK [)5
0 A TE RE p ORTE O: -~5e--~3~1~--C\...,O"-------
COMPLIANCE. 1.u~·.-. OTHER
ono)
pi I .) 00 Snee. Cond. 94 ---a, 2s0 c Location or sile 0-c; sir~ ,.c_
~.e.mo. 1 o oc Odor Cl€+;:-!,,~,,.....,, Description of sampling point hr bi hC/ c,C? re:.-;· iR
:arance 6,~c!s Taste
(pumo. ·5ailer,
Samolina l\.1ethod
Ren,arks
CIC .. )
-S,{,-c-o r 0
Sample Interval
('),[ I✓ o ic1 tr ¢-cfo r a;:
j
LA BORA TORY ANALYSES
, ,,,,,11~ I tJ, 80D~ "0 m-,11
coo 111,;i11 J' 0 mo/I
DiB, Sol Ids 70JOO mo/I
Fluoride 9S' mo/I '·' :;<1 v.,, 1077 UQ/1 ~ -" .\iumi,.,un• 1 1 05 UQ /I
O._~\b\,~\l,~o,' ~s,H>la,l'\\_;
Oro I no oho \"\,HJ,J-i' P~ s 1i e Id 1,
COD Lo, JJS m<;/1 Hardness:Toul 900 m,;i/1 a, Sul um 1007 u,;i/1
Colil.::rm:ur fer.a I J 16 1 6 / I 00ml Hardness .(non·c I rb J 902 mo /I c, Calcium "6 mo/I Acid H1nlicide1
Colilutm:Uf loUI 31~0~ / 100ml P1111nols J27JO uo/1 c,, Cadmium 1 0 2 7 u,;i/1
•oc ••e o m,;itJ Soecilic Cond. " uMhos/cm1 Ch,omium:To11l 10J~ uo /I ~'< 8 I 1. / .'It ul, 1 I E11r1c!1Cl1 Oroanlc1
I uf!11•1 i I y "' IITIJ !;u!l;i!u ') ~ !, ~ '~ 7'"~_.\'l°1'.ll \ L mo/I Cu Con,,.,, 1 0 ~ 1 uo/1 y: .-,. e Id f ,1roe1•t>le Oqpr,1c,
.~11 ]:;)>"·_",; ~<~~s .•::, '._; ...... ·_...,... mo/I '. lion 10~~ u,;i /I
'" '"' unit\
7~;:.. y.:_-_,;y_:_,_,,
~ :ty•::.-ct:·C: •. IJ'\' C ,,.L
Hg Mercury 7 1 9 00 uo /!
' Potassium '" mo/I
-c;,, Purge1tJl1 0101n,cs (VO.~ tJot11e)
.,-,'l',,ilin,ty ,o '" .., "' mg/I q IN() ·o '\':J'::)U l,!Q 1.!ao,.,esium '" mot' ''' • OiCromoeuuoe CE OBJ V , ,-, r• a Ii ni 1y ,o o>< ,., "' moll
'' /Jn Menoaoese 1 05 ~ UQ/1 >
CHt>ot:11e "' m,;i/t ',.r.:•-i.nn~\. \;J\\.\b1.~t N, Sodium '" moll
81c•"-"'nale "' mo II
,.,senlc::ou! 1001 uo/1
.__ ll\1\~\\, ~·N •~,\p'"',(q'.jl(~l· Ufl '" mo /I ,Wl~\h~ moll
:J( IJ IC~ e I 1 0 5 7 UQ/1
''" Lead IQ'., l UQ/1
x TC f-_
C~rt,on ,Jio,ld, "' m,;i/!
Cn1or1de ~ •O mo/l
C11,om,um:H11, 10JZ uo/1
N02 + NOJ " N 6JO mo/I
P: lo ta I " " "' mo/I
s, '; e I ,1 ni um ' '" uo/1
Zo line \091 UQ II rS cJ\TI1\CH~mc,
~.-·-, SIS IIEF6,,,
Colot:T"'" "" f'l•(;n
Cy onldt '20 m:111
~
· L.ib Commcn:s:
---------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAB~.
REPORTED BY
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SUPERVISOR
SAMPLE TYPE:
STDRIT f/0.
VOLATILE M-IALYTICAL REPORT
ci::;403
'
pv,2, ENTERED BY ffi
r' CHECKED BY 05
{µ(l
1?tK DATE 51/31/1~
I I
SEDI MEHT
ANALYSIS RESULT'3
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION
~ VOU,TILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED BY GC/ELCD/PID.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAB NO.
REPORTED BY
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SUPERVISOR
SAMPLE TYPE:
5TORET NO.
SEMI VOLATILE O RGI\ NI C RE PO RT
OG403
'f'.N:', ENTERED BY
/ tw CHECKED BY
/0
Stet· DATE~
SEDIMENT
Al-!AL YSIS RESULTS
COMPOUND
ORGANIC AHAL YSIS BY GC/MS I HD I CATES A MASS OF LATE
ELUTING CHEMICALS WHICH COULD NOT BE RESOLVED
OR I DENT! Fl ED. CONCENTRATION ESTIMATED AS A RATIO TO
A KNOWN INTERNAL STANDARD Af.D WAS IN THE RANGE OF:
DA-u-5
CONCENTRATION
1,300,000 UG/KG
-
-
C I I / C
c1":11J1•i r y _ _!::::::'---• -' i C ;"\
OUAD NO. f 7~)~ { SERI AL tJO.
N.C. DEPA.....,-MENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LAB NU/,IBEA 8 ~_4l)5
V ' LAT. "l,::o d' ,: ' /• LONG. ~/_
0 I 2 /I
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT O DATE AECEIVEDc~,,.-.,-/J:if-,-,96-T;me 9:_'75"D
DEM Rec'd by: ns From: Bu~'
Repon lo: ARO. FRO@ ARO, WaAO, WiRO, CR ~HAf1'\JERQ f Lr@ £Tc{) Q ~. Other ----=,,,;,..----=-,=
//l/;J///DATAENTAYBY: T)}j Cl('i::)S SAMPLE PRIORITY WSRO, Kinston FO Other, _________ _
Shipped by: Bu . . 01her /7; ///1-DATE REPOATE0: _ _..,,5'--.'-Z::14_-'3...i...sOc:__ __ _ □ AOUTI NE □ EMERGENCY
COLLECTOR(S): --f,"'"-C"-"//JL:__
FIELD ANALYSES
PH-100 Spec. Cond. 94
Ternp.10 oc
Appearance
DATE PURPOSE: BASEllNE, c~~~-COMPLIANCE. 1.u.i::·
,.__________kircle one)
Description of sampling point
OTHER
Odor --------
-----Taste --~M_A~Y_J_lJ 1i~Q,plinQ Method _\'-'f',f-__ /'().'-"U'-+J)"-'+/J---=----------.S_.~fliPle_ lnterva'J .:!-S: ~ (pu/np, baller, etc·.) -~~~~---------\ Field Analysis By:
LABOnATORY ANALYSES
8005 3 10 mg/I
COD High 3 ◄0 moll
COO low 335 mo/1
Colilorm:l.lf f11cal 3 16 16 1100ml
Coli1<..rm:Mf T Ola I 3150 ◄ 1100ml
TOC ,;,30 m,;i/1
Turbidity 76 NTU
'" <OJ uni I$
Alk;ilini ly topH4.S410 mo/I
Alkollinity 10 pH a, J 4 1 S mg/I
C.ubon1111 "' moll
Blc ■r<..Onillll HO mg/I
Ar$enlc:Tot•I 1002 """ CiirbOn dlo•ICle 405 mo/I
Ct,loride 9◄0 moll
Chromium:H11x 1032 U0/1
Color:Tru• 80 Pt-Co
C~anld• 120 molt -
Lab Comments:
GW-54 f1e:Yi~ed 7/85 -- - -
:;! '(pumping lime.~·;i, 1erno, etc.)
-Din. Solld, 70300 mgtl Ao -s11~11r 1011
fluorid11 951 mg/I Al
Hllfdn•H:Totat 900 mg/I Ba -f.hrium 1007
H.uCJn•u {non-carb) 902 m,;r/1 Ca -Calcium 916 4f \
Pn•nol, 32730 ug/J Cd· Cadmium 1021
Sp11cillc Cond. " uMho$/Cm1 Chromium:Tor■I 1034 uo/J
Sullo1111 9◄S molt Cu -Copper 1042 ugtl
SulllCJ• '" mo11 ug/1
Ho -Mucu,y 7 1900 ug /J
I< -Pou1ssium 937 mg/I
Mc -t.A.1gn111ium 927 moJ,
I.An -Manganue 1055 uo/1
N• -Sodium 929 mg/I
""' UN "0 mo/I Ni -Nickel 1067 uo/1
TKN "N '" mg/I Pb llfid 1051 ug/J
N02 • N03 11 N 630 moll S• S•lwnium 1147 v,;i/1
P:Toi.l u P 665 m',1/1 Zn Z,nc 1092 uo /I
For Dissolved Analysis -sui..~il lillered sample and write ·01s· in block
While copy Headauarters Pink cony -Reqion Yellow r:nnv • L:ib ---- - - - -
1!!!!1!11
,. '
,...,0, •'v~\,"\_ ti Io f I ne P,u,c,o,,
'-.::/ 1· "o,111 no oho, ptior u, P11l1Cid1, ,. \.,
\\ '" ACl(l H11rdicio11
IX BI s, , N t 1,1 Cr I I E,11ac11r:,1, 01g1n,c,
Ix. Acid E•lr.c11til11 Oro1n1c,
V Purg111blM Q,g1n,c5 (YOA 00 Ill•)
'.1 01bromo11th1n11 (EOB)
"!(','
---·-~, ,t,o .
.. ·--·-·-· ~"
1!111 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
VOLATILE MIALYTICAL REPORT
LAB NO. OG405
REPORTED BY 1i ENTERED BY
CHECKED BY IV~ CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY a.~-
SUPERVISOR :1</ Y, DATE. 5i/4~/4 O
SAMPLE TYPE: WATER
ANAL \'SIS RESULTS
STORIT NO. COMPOUND
34475 TETRACHLOROETHENE
DETECTED BY GC/ELCD.
NO VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED BY GC/PID
ffi •
DS
CONCENTRATION
0.25 UG/L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAB NO.
REPORTED BY
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SUPERVISOR
SAMPLE TYPE:
STORET HO.
\
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC REPORT
oc;405 •
sm ENTERED BY ffi
fr\() CHECKED BY 0 5 tm
~K DATE~
WATER
ANALYSIS RESULTS
COMPOUND COHCHITRATION
(
NO BASE/NEUTRAL OR ACID EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DETECTED
BYGC/MS.
..
-
\','$RO.
ro: AhO. r'RO.~. Rfl:0. 'NaRO, WiRO,
r\111sron FO 0 !her
Gus. ------·---··-~.Other
CCU .. E Ci OFi{S L ___ /_~0,_,_,_,"·:_. _/_/"'-·-' __ DATE
tit! ,1 O () ----Soec. Cone. 94
l •.!:'1:l l(l Odor ________ _
N.C. DE P,. _ _.;1-.IENT OF N,\ TUR,\l RESOURCES
& COMMUNITY DEVELOP/.\ENT 0
CHAJ~JJ~~blisroo¥R.,1 ~
SAMPLE PRIORITY 1J;f11 f
D ROUTINE O El.1E/1GEIICY/ / Ji!
Tl t~E PURPOSE:
Ownor
Location or site
Description of sampling point {._-<._/() (/
LAB fJUI.IBER 8
Rec'd by:
Other
DATA ENTRY BY:
COi.iPL! id/CE. 1.U~~·
one)
n
OTHE!l
_______ Taste Samplinq r.1ethod -_.,~,_\-__ ~(.)~~A=.un~-"'c+/J ________________ Sample In 1 er v a J
(pu~1p, baifer. etc.)
F1el0 ,\n~J-;s1s :ly: ______________ _ Rerr,arks
(pumping time, air temp, etc.)
LAi30Fl,\ TORY ANALYSES 'ii 'I'
01 ss. Solich 70300 moll AQ Si!~er 1 0 7 7 ~ .,! vo/J '· Q191nocrilorin• Po Olcido 1
Fluorice 9S' mo/I A> ,\lvminum 1'i:05 ·~ , .., . ,~ uc/1 ' "'" ~(.'1• noprio. Of'IOIV I P • 11• CI d • I
Hi!ran.~,:Tolal 000 mo11 B• a,,,um -1007 IIIN fu<J/1 = H ~ ,ane > s (non-c .,o) 90 2 mQ/1 c, Ca I c i um "6 mg/I A Cid H•rd,chl••
(:,11,1 .. rm:1.11 10ldl '.J\~O~ / 100ml Pr,eno1s J :n JO uo/1 c, Coom,om (QR,f]\[ ~JnWATffi SE HI N
rno11 S1a1cilic Cond. " ul.lhos/cm 7
Sull.ia, '" mo/I
Chrom1um:Tot.il 1 OJ~ DAI "I~" NC. 8• ,. • , N<1u!I I I E11racto0I• Oroon,c1
' .
Co Cooper 10~2 uo /I ,._Cl d f,111c1a::i1, o,c,n,c,
Sul fide ,. s mo/I f, 1,on I 0~ S uo/1
"' Metcu,~ l 19 00 uon )( Pu1<;1,00lo o,can,c1 !VO,o, OOlllo)
uni Is ' Po1.1nium 93 7 mg/I
mo11 "' M.ign,1sium '" mO,'> '. 7 Oio,ornoetl'lano ([08 l
''" 1.Unoanese JOSS UQ/1
//;i Soo,um "' mo 11
mo/i NH3 " N 610 mo/I '" /l IC~ e I 1067 UQ/1
u::::/1 Tr.ll " N 625 mQ/1 PO L" id 1os1 <JQII
.1<_0:1.,. NOJ .. N 630 mo/I
~ ~u P: To la I .. p 66S n\Q/1
' ' ' _,\ ,_.. ,,,·
s. Sel~n,um 11•7 V'J/1 S, r~ TT k.CJ:i£D.....QR.f~tb r-
lo ?.,nc \09] <J'J /I A '11',> vc,c RCP0PT
•·
~' \ c. -
Lab Comrnenl$:
v
---------------.,~·~--~-·~•1~',· . '~ i G ','; -~ 4 n r. vi=--e d 7 / O 5 t5,\,\~1}~.:~\S~')'c, _,._.._f"'~o~,-;cD~i~s~· s~o~I ~v~e~d;-A;-::n~a~l~y~s~i~s=---s~u:-c~cn:-i ~, ~,~;~,~, ec-:,~e~d;-s--a:-m~p--:-1-e_a_n_d-,---w-,~;-,-e---=·~o~,~S~.;-ci-n-cb-c-l o-c-,----------------------
W hi I e copy Headquar1ers f}ink copy -Region Yellow copy -Lab ·,/ - - - - - - - - -
l!!!!l!!I ----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAB HO. OG4D6
REPORTED BY
CHECKED 6Y
REVIEWED 6Y
SUPERVISOR
;2,/11
ll.K-C<
J;f,k'
SAMPLE TYPE: WATER
STORIT HO. COMPOUND
34496 I, I DICHLOROETHAHE
. 34475 TETRACHLOROETHENE
YOLATIU ANALYTICAL REPORT
AHAL YSIS RESULTS
ENTERED B'r' -'=[B'--'---
CHECKED BY _b_. '.5 __ _
CONCENTRATION
!
0.18 UG/L
0.31 LIG/L QUANTIFIED BY GC/ELCD.
39180 TRICHLOROETHENE 84 UG/L DETECTED BY GC/PID.
OUAI)
LAT.
rio. !'.?r)j 3
3s-'n's:3
SERI AL N().
0 G .~/';:3 ,::· L N . ~·--'-----"'°-'----
N.C. DEP,, .MENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ' LAB NUl,IBEA 8 iJG 4(27
DEM Rec'd by~ From: Bu~
Reoort 10: ARO. Fno.§ RAO. WaRO. WiRO.
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT O DATE RECEIVEr>'?fefto Ti"'!' Lr7}7)
~~NDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM O1her----~~--------_, -· 'NMar ru~t:fA I DATA ENTRY BY JB CKD5 WSRO. Kinslon FO Other ________ _
Sh. d '· --✓~ 0 ,ope uy: Bus/ Cooner, ther _______ _ ~
COLLECT OA{S) ,./\•/,'.,,, / (£,.._
o AOUTl~E-tyg.JJJD¾ II$!,/ DATE REPORTED s-zg-q()
Tll.1E _.:;.:J-.c.:__~_u __ PURPOSE: BASEllNE, ~00PLAIN.P.e COMPLIANCE, t.u~··, OTH[:R _______ _ OATE
\ -rc--Trc I , one·)
FIELD ANALYSES Owner pc;y
pt! 4 00 Spec. Cond. 94
TemP.10 oc Odor
Appearance Ta s ie
rield Analysis Sy,
air temp, eic.)
LABORATORY ANALYSES , MQOllf3Vlllf ._\':, -~t' .-,C,
80D!, J>O ,rf'I C /I Diss. so"ltfff 70300 moll AO -s11~W"1·011 ,_ ·\\">"uc'11,. Oro1nochlorln1 P•stlcld,s coo High J<O ~OIi fluorld• 9$1 mo/I Al • .\luminum 1105,\':.\'0'{'11' r-\\ug/1 01o•nophosohorus P,stichhs COD "· '" me/I Ha1dn1u:To11r 900 mc/J B1 -B1rlum·1m\JV ntl..\_.\-\, uoll Colilorm:1.1r F ,cal 3 I 616 / IOOml Hudn,ss (non-cub) 902 moll . c, -Calcium 916 mo/I ACid H11d1cid1s
Coldurm:Mf T 01;11 3 1 !>O• / 100ml Phenols 32730 ug/1 c, • Cadmium 102 7 uo/1
TOC "' moll Spacllic Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2 Chromlum:Toul 103◄ ug/1 81st I N1ut,1t Ei1,ac11t11, 0101n1c, Tu1 t>i di ty 16 /HU Sullate 9 ◄5 moll Cu -Copper 10◄ 2 uo/1 Acid E.r11c1at11f Orr;i1nics
Sullld• "5 moll Fo · 1,on 10◄5 ug/1
Ho · Me,cury 7 1900 uo/1 v Pu,oe1.t1l1 01g1nlcs (VO,., t>o111e) pH '"' unih K • Po11uium 937 mo/I
,o,l~•llnily 10 pH .., "o mo/I Mo • Maonesium 927 mo/I 1.2 • Oit11omoe lhane (EOBJ ,o, I~ ;a I lnl ty " pH ,. ' "' mg/I Mn· 1.tang1.nesa 1055 uo/1
Cut>on111 .. 5 moll "' Sodium 929 moll
81Clft..OOIII HO moll NH3 1.1 N 6" moll NI Ni ck el 1067 ug/1
A.fHnlc:Toul 1 002 uo/1 TKN 1.S N 625 mg/I PO L11d 105 1 ug/1 CCC •TTACHE0cJRGMl''v"
Cut.ion dlo•lde •O!> moll N02 'f' N03 11 N 6JD moll s, Sel1nium ' , ◄ 7 ug/1 Jo.NAL YSIS Kt.l'V' Chloride 940 moll P:To1aJ It. P 665 moll z, 7. inc 1092 uo/1
Ch1om1um:H1• 1031 ug/1
Colo,:Trve 80 P1-Co
C11nld1 710 mQ/1
Lab Comments:
- ----For Dissolved Analysis ---

-
sui,~it filtered samnlP.·anrl -

-

-
writ~ •n1s• in hlnr.L--

-

-
--1!111!1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAB NO. 08407
REPORTED BY r',J
CHECKED BY M:.-
REVIEWED BY (1/..<L
SUPERVISOR ::Rf,1:'.; DATE s/,_,; /4 o r I
•,
SAMPLE TYPE: WATER
ANALYSIS RESULTS
STORIT HO. COMPOUND
34475 TITRACHLDROITHENE
DETECTED BY GC/ELCD.
METHYL TERTBUTYL ETHER
DETECTED BY GC/PI D.
'.
ENTERED BY ~ •
CHECKED BY\) 5
CONCENTRATION
' 0.85 UG/L
30 UG/L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Laboratory Services
·f-lf::.Gl:.IVED
State Laboratory of Public Health
P.O. Box 28047, Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Environmental Sciences Annlysis Report
' Name of Owner,.>, Patie~t
or Su pp 1 y : ___,,G-=C\c,.S_,:J:-"'o'-'r:,'-----------
Addr es s:
County: C-c!s±aa
Report To: \r·')"" Cov r; hU" Gci 5:ft;.,--, CO\Jyt\ r
0~ ~. _/ Address: /JI GJ l-hirl-;01'1 o/iPL'
Gos-reu'a. t./c ciS05;) I
Date Collected: _L/:.i-._-'.;;)"'-''7_-__,_C/.:::6 _____ _
Collected By: ~ {b,r 1 ·h..er
Analysis Desired: Uo{.
Laboratory Sample Sample Description or Remarks
Number Number
905176 r,0-1 fl Mr k S ~o .. v SEE
,, 905177 ({)-J 5 ku \o:,,d br Si:C.1
_;, .
. nr::1 ryQ Co-3 ]',:. \.(; Y\ ( . till y()I.JTIU:
905179 ( r,-L\ t'Z\o, ke. I ()..,_f ,'{''lh tiOYOlATil
905180 ro-~ __(y\'\fl: 7 lv.i~ / l.DJ·~-l /Jc;,,, r-s-
/ \ A ,
t , I 1~'--'"-' ~· l"'\'-'
iflAY 18 1990
SUPERF!JND SECT/ON
Results In
~TTACH~D SHEET(S)
~• KHf.D Sl·HIT(S)
01,11'6\JNDS 1tl(Ni1FIEO
C01,1 l'O\l II DS IOCll1lf1ED
E ATTACHED SHUT(S)
'
'
~--e:-:~((.t.,: '; _a
Date Received --~S--_-_l -_<"f_. _O_,u..,r.c.=_:_ __ Date Reported __ _=cS_,_-/~t)'-· _-.,_,; z'.'-'-"0"----
Da te Extracted __________ Date Analyzed VOC-5H..:__5}~iJA£rvL
DEHNR Form 2364 Revised (9-89)
' Laborator·y
Reported By: ~'E]_/1--1~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
) STATE IABOR/\TORY Of PUBLIC HEAL TH .• i
DIVISION Of HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARTMENT Of HlJMN RESOURCES
Laborato,·y No.
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611 / /
_1/'t)5/7l, PURGEABLE COMPOUNDS Dale of Analysis -~~'-1-,.....:.f_o_ t i,/'-t f.f'?
..
COMPOUND JJ9/l COMPOUND I
Di ch lorodi fluorarethane TI Ch 1 orobenzene
Chlorarethane Ethvlbenzene
v'Vinv] Chloride 1 1 1 2-Tetrachloroethane -Brorranethane _n-Xv]ene '
Ch loroethane 11>-Xvlene
1richlorofluorarethane o Xvlene
✓l 1-Dichloroethvlene Stvrene
Hethvlene Chloride Brcm:iform
tert-Butvl HethvJ Ether I ]benzene
'Transl] 2 Oichloroethvlene ' 1. 1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane
I ·1 ether ,7 Brarobenzene
1 1-Dichloroethane ../-v-,, " ,, . n-P-··lbenzene
2 2-Dichlo---ane J j 1 2 3-Trichlo--ane
1Ci!0 1 2-Dichloroethvlene -:i 'i< 2-Ch lorotoluene
Chloroform II.' -r 1 3 5-Trirrethvlbenzene
IBC/1\ Bromxh lorarethane ' I 4-Ch 1 oroto 1 uene
✓1 1 ]-Trichloroethane ../-v-,, a D ITertl Butvl Benzene:
1 1-Dichlo ne /1 Pentachloroethane
✓carbon Tetrachloride 1,2,4-Trirreth~lbenzene
✓Benzene ISecl Butvl Benzene '
✓1 2-Di ch loroethane o-Is ltoluene '
✓Trichloroethvlene lnl,4'
1.2-Dichlor---ane II 1 3-Dichlorobenzene i
✓1 4-Dichlorobenzene
Brom:xlichloranethane n-Butvlbenzene
Dibrorranethane l. 2-Di ch lorobenzene
Toluene fBisl 2 Chlorois 1 Ether
1 1 2-Trichloroethane . 1-2-Dibraoo 3 Chlo....-.r.rrv">ane
Tetrachloroethene I It 1 2 4-Trichlorobenzene
1 3-Dichlo--ane II Hexachlorobutadiene
Dibromxhlorarethane N°nhthalene
1 2-Dibronoethane IED6' 1 2 3-Trichlorobenzene
1-Chlorohexane ' I
I
HDL -Hininun Detection Limit for water (EPA Hethod 502.2), is 1.0 JJg/1.
J -Estimated value.
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
u -Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed.
1/ -Tentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulated voe T -Tr1halancthane
N.C. Division of Health Services
OflS 3068-0 (1/89 Laboratory)
\Jg/1
Ii
'
'
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STATE LABORATORY Of PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION Of HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARTHENT Of HUMN RESOURCES P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILHINGTON Sl, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
Laboratory No . ..,r?'--"'o_,_, .... V~Z~7 __ PURGEABLE CO'IPOUNDS Date of Analysis
CO'IPOUND µg/1 CO'IPOUND
Dichlorodifluorarethane IA Chlorobenzene
Ch l orcme thane Ethvlbenzene ' v'Vinvl Chloride 1. 1. 1.2-Tetrachloroethane
Br-aimv?thane o-Xvlene
Ch l oroethane m-Xvlene
Trichlorofluorarethane o-Xvlene
✓l 1-Dichloroethvlene Stvrene
llethvlene Chloride Brarofonn
tert-8utvl llethvl Ether I lbenzene
(Trans}l 2-Dichloroethvlene
I l ether
l l 2 2-,etrachloroethane
Brarobenzene I
l 1-Dichloroethane n-P~vlbenzene
2 2-Dichlo ane 1.2 3-Trichloroorooane
(Cisl 1.2-Dichloroethvlene 2-Ch loroto l uene I
Ch lorofonn 1.3 5-Trimethvlbenzene
(BC/1} Brooxx:hlorcmethane 4-Chlorotoluene
✓l l.1-Trichlorocthane <Tertl Butvl Benzene l 1-Dichlo ne Pentachloroethane i
✓Carbon Tetrachloride 1,2,4-Trimeth~lbenzene
✓Benzene (Seel Butvl Benzene '
✓l.2-Dichloroethane n-Is ltoluene ✓Tri ch loroethvlene 1_,..,., ~ <2..., 1.3-Dichlorobenzene l 2-Dichlo~rnnane IA ✓l 4--Dichlorobenzene Brarodi ch l ormdhane n-Butvlbenzene I Dibr-aimv?thane l 2-Dichlorobenzene I Toluene fBisl 2 Chlorois l Ether l. l 2-Trichloroethane l 2-Dibl"OTl)-3 Chlornnrnnane
Tetrachloroethene +r-ll C.e., 1.2 4-Trichlorobenzene
1 3-Dichloroornnane I Hexachlorobutadiene
Dibrooxx:hlorarethane Nanhthalene
l 2-Dibraroethane (EDB) 1.2 3-Trichlorobenzene
1-Chlorohexane '
-
HDL -Hini1TUTI Detection Limit for water (EPA llethod 502.2), is 1.0 µg/1.
J -Estimated value.
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given. L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given. U -Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed. 1/ -Tentative identification.
✓ -Re~ulaled VOC T -Tr1halancthane
N.C. Division of Health Services ~S 3068--0 ( l/89 laboratory)
µg/1
,,
, ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'-.) STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEAL TH !
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUI\I\N RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
Laboratory No. 9o {/JO PURGEABLE CXJl1POUNDS Date of Analysis
COMPOUND JJ9/l CONPOUND
Dichlorodifluoranethane ,, Chlorobenzene ' ' Chloronw:,thane Ethvlbenzene
v'Vinvl Chloride 1 1 1 2-Tetrachloroethane
Braranethane o-Xvlene '
Chloroethane m-Xvlene
Trichlorofluoranethane o-Xvlene
✓1-1--0ichloroethv]ene Stvrene
HethvJene Chloride Braoofonn
tert--Butvl Hethvl Ether I ]benzene
/Trans' 1 2-Dichloroethvlene ' l. 1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane
l 1 ether Brcrrobenzene
1 1--0ichloroethane ..J.,,--1) , 0 n-P-"lbenzene ' 2 2--0ichlornnrnnane J 1 2 3-Trichlo=~ane
'Cis' 1 2-Dichloroethvlene 2--Chlorotoluene '
Chlorofonn 1 3 5-Trimethvlbenzene
'BCM' Brcmxh loranethane 4--Ch 1 oroto 1 uene
✓l 1 ]-Trichloroethane /Jert' Butvl Benzene
L 1-Dichlor ne Pentachloroethane I
✓carbon Tetrachloride 1 2 4-Trimethvlbenzene
✓Benzene rsecl Butvl Benzene
✓l 2-Dichloroethane . D-J 1 toluene '
✓Trichloroethvlene :.+:r /) , 0. 1 3-Dichlorobenzene ' 1 2-Dichlor=~ane I ✓l 4-Dichlorobenzene I
Brarodichloronw:,thane n-Butvlbenzene '
Dibraranethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene I
Toluene fBisl 2 Chlorois ' 1 Ether
1 1 2-Trichloroethane 1-2-0ibraro 3 Chlor=r=ane
Tetrachloroethene +r11 ,-,o~ 1. 2. 4-Trich lorobenzene
1.3-Dichlo-r-ane u Hexachlorobutadiene
Dibrcmxhloranethane N•nhthalene
1. 2-Dibrorroethane 1EDB1 ' 1 2 3-Trichlorobenzene
1--Ch 1 orohexane '
CC»t'ENTS:
HDL -Hinirrun Detection Limit for water (EPA Method 502.2), is 1.0 JJ9/l.
J -Estimated value.
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given. u _ Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA -Not analyzed. 1/ -Tentative identification.
✓ -Resulated VOC
T -Tr1halancthane
N.C. Division of Health Services
OHS 3068--0 (1/89 Laboratory)
µg/1 . -'
I