NCD003200383_20060106_Koppers Co. Inc._FRBCERCLA RA_PCP Building Demolition-OCR

• &~~A
..;;;;;;::;;-~,:-~-~
•
MCDEMR
North Carolina Department of Environment and l\latural Resources
Dexter R. Matthews, Director
Ms. Beverly Stepter
Remedial Project Manager'
Division of Waste Management
January 9, 2006
Superfund Remedial Site Evaluation Branch
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4
Sam Nunn -Atlanta Federal Center
6 I Forsyth Street
Atlanta, GA 30303
RE: Demolition Completion Report -Former Cellon Process Building
Former Koppers Industries, Inc. NPL Site
Morrisville, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Stepter:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
The Superfund Section of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NC DENR) has received and reviewed the Demolition Completion Report -Former Cellon
Process Building for the Former Koppers Industries, Inc. National Priority List (NPL) Site. The
Superfund Section offers the attached comments.
The NC DENR Superfund Section appreciates the opportunity to comment on this document. If
you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
7Z~j.l0
Environmental Engineer
NC Superfund Section
cc: Mr. Michael Helbling, Beazer East, Inc.
1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Phone [phone] \ FAX [phone] \ Internet http://wastenotnc.org
An Equal Opportunity/ Affirmative Action Employer-Printed on Dual Purpose F:ecycled Paper
DEMOLITION COMPLETION REPORT -
FORMER CELLON PROCESS BUILDING
Former Koppers Industries, Inc. NPL Site
Table of Contents
•
1. Please correct the Table of Contents to indicate that the titles of Section 3.0 and Section
4.0 are "Demolition Debris Take-Off Quantities and Disposal" and "Ambient Air Dust
Monitoring Results", respectively.
Section 1.0 Introduction
2. Piease revise the second paragraph of Section 1.0 to include a reference to the waste
characterization and work plan description submitted as the "Request for Approval -
Planned Demolition Activities."
Section 2.0 Description of Demolition Activities
3. Please correct the first sentence of the second bullet item in Section 2.0 to state
"Salvageable environmental equipment such as hoses, well screens, and treatment vessels
were retained by Chemtron, disposed in a Subtitle D Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)-approved landfill, or recycled
as scrap."
4. Please define the acronym "HEPA" in the fourth bullet item in Section 2.0.
5. Please remove the sixth bullet item in Section 2.0 and reinsert following the ninth bullet
item in Section 2.0 (i.e.; following the description of actual building demolition
activities).
6. Please revise the third sentence of the third bullet item on page 2-3 of Section 2.0 to state
' "One drum of soil cuttings was managed as F032 waste and thirteen drums of soil
cuttings were managed as non-hazardous waste." ·
Section 3.0. Demolition Debris Take-Off Quantities and Disposal
7. Please revise the last sentence of the third paragraph of Section 3.0 to state "This material
was transported to Spring Grove Resource Recovery in Cincinnati, Ohio for treatment
and disposal."
8. Please revise the fifth and sixth sentences of the fourth paragraph of Section 3.0 to state
' "Based on the presence of pentachlorophenol on the interior building walls and the
presence of lead on the interior pedestals, this material was managed as F032 waste and
D008 waste, respectively. The brick, mortar, and concrete rubble were transported to
Michigan Disposal in Belleville, Michigan for treatment and disposal."
I
•
9. Please revise the la~t sentence of the fifth paragraph of Section 3.0 to state "This material
was transported to Chemtron's facility in Avon, Ohio for treatment and disposal."
Section 4.0 Ambient Air Dust Monitoring
10. Please revise the third paragraph of Section 4.0 to include a sentence describing the
instrument detection limit and applicable action limit for use at the Site.
Table 4-1 Summary oflntensive Activity Dust Monitoring
11. Please correct the spelling of the word "moist" in the activity description portion of the
entry for 8:00a.m. on September 20 in Table 4-1.
12. Please revise Table 4-1 to include a note providing the instrument detection limit and the
applicable action level for use at the Site. ·
• &iih __ •
NCDENR
North Carolina Qepartment of Environment and Natural Resources
Dexter R. Matthews, Director
Ms. Beverly Hudson
Remedial Project Manager
Superfund Branch
Waste Management Division
US EPA Region IV
6 I Forsyth Street, 11th Floor
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Division of Waste Management
July 18, 2005
RE: Request for Approval -Planned Demolition Activities
Former Koppers Industries, Inc. NPL Site
Morrisville, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Hudson:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
The Superfund Section of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NC
DENR) has received and reviewed the Request for Approval -Planned Demolition Activities for the
Former Koppers Industries, Inc. National Priority List (NPL) Site. The NC DENR Superfund Section
recommends approval of this work plan for the proposed demolition activities at the site contingent upon
the following conditions:
I. Notification of the appropriate regulatory agencies shall be given 30 days prior to the
initiation of all field activities in order to secure third party oversight, if warranted. The
NC DENR Superfund Section shall provide the appropriate staff for oversight activities if
desired by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA).
2. Contractor and subcontractor work plans, health and safety plans, etc. must be submitted
for regulatory review 15 days prior to the initiation of any field activities in order to
accommodate review and revisions, if needed.
The NC DENR Superfund Section appreciates the opportunity to comment on this document. If you have
any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
cc: Mr. Robert Fisher, Beazer East, Inc.
Sincerely,
Dauid-13. /Y/.~ /d f
David B. Mattison
Environmental Engineer
NC Superfund Section
1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Phone [phone] I FAX [phone] I Internet http://wastenotnc.org
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Action Employer-Printed on Dual Purpose Recycled Paper
l.
June 1!5, 2005 ·.
. • . . • . ·-l.
· Mr..Davi_d,B. Mattison,,CHMM . . . . .
North·Caroiina Department of Environment and Natural
. : Divisi~n of Waste )vlanagem~ent; Stiperfu~d Section;' ..
401 Oberlin Road · ., . , · ·; , .
, , · " · · 1 · t · · . Raleigh, North ,Carolina 27605 . . . . ' .
RE: : Request.for Appr~v~i' .
.. . '!-•. • .. Planned Demolition •Activities
F~rmer Koppers Company Site.
Morrisville; North Carolina . '
, . ' :1 ·. ,.
Dear Mr. Mattison: · : t
. ;
,. /
.• , .. I . . . .. . .
Asyo_u_ ~e .. aware, ·Beazer, /East, ·_Inc. (Beazer) has ··completed _building material characterization ·
. : activities for "a ·smali' brick stmcture and associated interior and exterior concrete pedestals located at·
the subje;t site. A siiii location map is·provide~ as Figure. I .. · Photographs.of the brick structure and : the pedestals are nrovided as fhotogr_aph~ I' tlirough· 8. . . , . . . ' . . .· . · : -., :, . ' · ·
. , • ' ! ~ • , , ':: • \' :• ,: • • • ' . ' • • . , • • •, • 'I,• < : _., • • • •
· This Request for Approval f9( the planned demolition activities summarizes information regarding,
the characterization activities, and prov1des details regarding ·the demoiition and ·scope' of w_ork/~ork ·.
plan for the brick structun(iuid concreie pedestals.• 'Tt:is respectfuily requested' that·yoil 'provide
Be_azer wit!) a letter indicating approval of the planned demolition activities. · .. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
Th~ c~~r,tcieri,?~ii_on a~tivii;}s we;e· com;leie~ to ascertaii: if the building m~terials 'exhibit the
. presen<;e of any cm1sti.tuents• that could dictate _ulti~ati,,, material management and· disposal option~,
Specifically, given the nature of the·h°ist9rical operations in .the building, it' was suspected that interior
building surfaces. may exhibit' ihe _prese~ce. of pentachlorophenol (PCP).' Furthermo·r~, ,Be,1zef's'
.-experience had derrionstratect';that th~ _orange paint ·on _intetjoi ~d exterior pedestals might be lead~· .
·based and -that the .blue paint o_n' the, floor ·of•the structure might exhibit the pres¢nce 'of·".
polychlorinated biphenyls'{PGBs); The. majority of these hypotheses ·.were confirmed as a result .of
.. sampling and analysis completed-via two separate sainplin1{events; . . . . ...
• . • ': ' • • . •' • • I • . • • ' ' . . . '
iable 1 provides a s~m~ar/ of the ~al~i~a1: re~_ults · fo~ 'the ~urface :samples• obtain~d :from \he." .
. various building _maferiaJs: ~~r11pe, wipe, ana· chip ( dnlling dust) samples :were obtained, contingent . . . ":'
•·upon the'type of material sampled. As shown in_Table l, the orange paint on the pedestals was found
to contain lead at a concentr~\io'n jn excess of th~ lead~based paint critepon (5'l(o).' 1/i .addition, the .
. interior painted surfaces ofthe brick building were foµnd to. c_oniain r·cp at'concentrations i1{excess .
of Universal Treatment$tand~rds. Finally, the blue paint from the floor of the building was found to
contain PCBs 1n excess, qf the universal treatment standard and limits· established pursuant.to the.
·., Toxic S_ubstances Control:Act.: pie steel-roof trusses were found tO'exhibitminor inipa~.t by PCP.an~.
'no impact \vas discerned for the•corrugated 'galvanized roofing: · · ·.• ·. ·. . . . . · . · · · · . · ' . ' ' . . ' . . .. ·, ~ ' -. ---. . ' . . \ .
' .
• . I.
Rosslyn Farms l,ndustrial Park •
• \_ •• •• 1' • •• ••• •• • ' • ' , : '· •• ' • • '.
1200 Arc~ Street ~ Suite .f00. • Carnegie, PA,15106 •. [phone] Fax:.(412) 279:4332 _. _·.
' . ' .. '' '. . . . .. :. ', . . ·-. . ·' .
.{; -; :,· i?ii'},: · :· •i'.:;<t::::,;f; ";/ :· ' · .• ', ;: : · :2:, · · · · -> · ·, · ·
. , .. <. 'MripavidB~~-attiso11,CHM0'\ ;:: '.:;:.;:··/, :::-. :_, ·:-::, /•;_'., >/ >_'..:: ·>:::;•,'\'.,;',i:.:; :''.'' ·, '
, .'·(.'· ... _'·,:.June:1_6,2OO5'-:Page-Two,·.:.'• :.. :·· ·. ·; ..... · .-. :.; . ,, .,' ... ·. ,. ,., ·. , .. ,. . . ..
• ,.. • • ,, • ' ' • ' ,,., ' ¼• . . • .., ,· ;· '• ·\,:;. ·.'.,-,,,·.,,,. _:.'··\.::(,:{: •. , ... i :: i ·.· .:·-.: ·:-::} '\' ,·: :;'. < .> .. : r :_'.-:\::: :: :;· },_. ':\\\·:.(:-· : . .-,;· ;. ·: .-·. ::..,-.:,,.: :: ·: .... -/;< :·._ -, ... ·7{. · : ·: .
. . _.,, '-/ ; -:I( sho_uld ~e __ no/~d;,th~rt~~i imp~cts: appe~ t_o_:b~ to~fin~d'.to· ~hf surfa~es jo,f _t~e-vai:i_ous _building;_ : -:: '. . : ." I
, . . , • , . ·.matenals (1.e., impacts are either. m the pamt or. are.confined-to the-surface of-the pamted bnck). · ThIS ; . · ·, · .. : · •. • '' ;,',•;c .• ., ·.' :,.~ •.,-_,·-, ~1;·4.-t·,._: ···• ·~ ,-·:; - • -, ·,•.· ( ·:·, .. , ·.· .. ~ .. ,.-.. ··'·" ,,,., -_,. .... ,_,·~ ,: • ,_ .. ·: ·." is particularly evident from-the·.depth'specific sampling 'ofthe bnck,as shown,in Table J ·:·: '.Therefore; .-: '.-., ·. ,
, •, ~-• ••.' •,:,_,,., ', ·•• • ,••v -•·.•,'.'. •;•' ~ .-,~ -.-•,.•, • .•• _-•: 1,,\-,.,•~•-" ,•_•(,.•;,••,••::,,;· '•.:', -••• -• • · · .,,,: ;. ·. 1t'1s,cons1dered techrncally,.feas1ble ·to effect.decontammahori of the structure and pedestals via sand.';,· ... :, . - ' -. ' •••••• ·-.~ • ' •. -' <' . -.-~ .~..-.-,, ..... -~_. ,_,. ,-_,.,,, •~-•' ' •... ·: ,,. . ·--· ,·,, ••
: ' , " :: · )ilajting: Ho~evei:i' B~az¢r ~om,pl~ted a' preliPJinary· cos(aiid, ipplell)entability. analy~if an~ has .. > l · ..
• : . : .. , · . . ·· determined. that: decoiitiuriination, of the materials,: followec\' oy. confirni.atory :sampling/analysis· and : , · .
. ;, :. : /. ·. frartsj:,oi;tation:~d disposa_i' i_s not a: c~st-effective ·ahe~ativef6f'the:·4erriolition p~oj·e~f · The cost .8r: -: '.·
• ~ ' · ... :• ·=·de~oiitainination; cccinfirinilt6ry, sampling a~d analysis, and'disp6sa1'is;greaterthan'the· ccisf of s1inp1y.',. , · , ·, . . '.' ' .•. ·•· ., •. , • ; .·•, .. •i· .,.,, . ~" . ' .. ,,-•·· ~ ·_ ·.• --·· -~, , .. ~ .,, ';• .•. ' £·· .,·. ·. · .. ' -:demolishing;the building and: managing tp.e,.impa~ted. materials (i.e.; .. the j:,aiiit•,and the ,'brick),:as' ,'' ', -~ ., .
··. , ·-'·.:. ,. • .• • ., '• ••• ,1 • ' ~--, ':•, ,,-. -·•~,: .,-... \.· ... ,', \•. _•: ,,,1 . ..,_ ·,'. ·.:/, . ,_,. ,-· ••. ~. _., .:;' · ·hazardous waste,.,.-. , ·. .-·1 ·· ·,,-. · ··~ -··. · ··, · ·, · ... · _. '. ·-· 1 -. . -·· --'>/, • _-'r _.·-~,•-.. ·. ·.·. :·_; . -::·/, /-,._:f,( ''; :·;.:,:·,: :;,::,,, ·'. •" .... :··,':· :.)t:·_.\~·:;-.,._,i: . .-·.~, t_·:·::c:..·-/-\' .;:· .. •.'·:':
·•,·, Burtherinore,'Cit should 'also be noted that the'riiajori'ty:ofthe'impact·to·ih'e' interior of.the brlckwalls: : ..
• '•, ,••. \ '• '.' • •'(~ '•",.•. f ,, •• ~••,•,•,' •••• ),,'r ',1'•'', ,.,; •• l •'\ -••"
·., : /· has 11lrea'dy b.een !icJdre~sed \ia tjie' ~amp ling 'l1?d analysis'e,ffort/ As; a fesulf'of.t~e.Jar~e volum_e of ., ,_'. · ·
• ' ',: •, .. ·. scraped m·~terial· requir~d-,forcarialytical pqrJioses, 'the. j:,riT11aif:.stained 'areas fo:thebuilding' have, ', ", .
·: · ·' . ,:;•,:' .. ·already' :been .'remediated: ,:';: Pli~togriiphs : 9, 'afid -i'o ; depi~r ''before'.', :and: "after'·' '{~ages 'of'.a.-: ·, ... ,
.'· .~.--., .. , _ _..,,._,·_. ·.•,'•._1,. •• '·_,, .,, ·') , •• ,.,,. : ·-.. ' .-·: · .... --c-,. ·' •J.._••.-•,· .. :,.•;, ~-··',-• -· .•• .-.·~-,, , .· •:> , ; representative stain_edJ~rea on;tp_e·~ast waff.-of the_~~i)di_ng . .':As·sho"'.n 'ir,i:the photograph~;the. stain .• , .· ·!
·, ·': ·.·. ' was readily removed _via scraping and the residual impact in the brick is.'relatively minor based oh the: : , , ,'
. de~th0~pecific,r~stlis for,the:brid~ a; ~uinmai:i~~d ih Table.r: 'Therefore, it is, considered'unlikely that.:' ;·· .-.. :: ..
'-·. :the,: .. bulR '.pt;p concentrations·. in~. the :·brick actually,· exceed Universal· Treatment' Standards .. .' '· ~. ,'\
'. · .;.··. , N6~ethe1e·s;,.Beazer'intends.tci'manag~'.the·bric'k as'•a listed h~~d~us wast~ as a'·co'n;erv~tive-(i.'e.,"· , '"'
•, ·,,· _,._.,, ,, , ••• ~,·,,· .,_-. '·',.-,.,'".:: :~,. :,, •• i·f' ~-·_r· ., · · • · , , · pr9tectJv~).m_c;a~ure for.d1spq~al-purposes. : , . , ., .. ·. · .. :.· ,-",•· ;'_ ,, ·. • "'. • ·. :! ··' • ; .. ·· . .:. . , .. '.· · •.
' , ~' .... /~ ~· -:. ':, ·., . : . : . ; .__ ,-' ./ ... ,: ,'. \ . .,. ··:: \', ''-· .. _. ·"}. ': :_ ~~ ~_. . ..,-·. : :,·:.-1 '··\· ~~-·: ·_ :: .-' '~-/ ''. :\'· 1_., t.;' :·)i-'\' :: < ~~--~/· , .. , . ,: -~:-_. \ --.. <:-.. ~-' ·_, \ -~ . ' .
. . •. :.:·· •, · · Atta~hrnenf A :9u,tliil_es the_ P},Fed s~op~ cif\ycirk_~.d 'selected: di_S))OSal 'facilities; for,the deme>liti<,m . , ·,:· ,,''···.
· -. ·. · .' · " · project.' As discussed in the attached phm;-the,scope of,work ·consists of.the following activities: . · , · ·, ·:. · .. ,• . -~,i't'-""---~~-·~--~ · .. • ... ~.?. .. ~.··~·-::/,-.·;>:·-: ··:'J.:..··.;:-:<~: ~-:-'. __ :_·-~':: -~~-:·:,:::--:_:. ?,·_:·._-,1
.--(' ·, • :<,-~· '~\.~·~/.:,..·;···,<.·_·,.,···-'_.),,_ ·';"·:i
. . . ' : ·' • · Clearing and . grubbing :·of the· areas• surrounding the ·pedestals: and the building : will Be .. · .' .'.. :·· .
• • • I , ,•, , '.\ • , , , '• ' 1 • • ' -••, ' JI • • •• • • • .._, •• • • ' ~It • • , · , . :, ·. '-:•· .. completed: .. Weeds, trees) and grasses will be·cut or mowed to afford access to the·structures. ~ :. · ·
\ ,' • ) •' • • • • ' . • • • c • ... , • • \ • ' ' • • ' I -, > ' , ' • • • 'J. ,· , .• , .. <. ' • ., • ~ ,( • ' . . , .. _, ., .,. , . The yegetatj"'.e inaterial'will',oe staged 'onsi\e and .will ul\iajately.be'. disposefih a ,S_ubtitle. D .. : · · ... , '.
'._CERCtA7approv~d-landfill al6ng' with.the concrete from'th{exterior-pedestals; . ',. , · · : .. :,>• '
•:•, • : /~' ;: •M.-> '.\' ~ ••:_, .. • --•~•:• •• •••, • '; O ~ : •-·~•; :_•; ~ •.-'., < ~ /, ~ .. ~:::; ~•• •:• ·;•,_'::_,:,1:•• \ • ,: :.: • •~'. •· •~.-~<~:~ :-_,~•• /_. ,> :: , ~.•• •:: < ~;•:~~ ~::• :,,:.•, :•s • O .: . O -:•: .~,. ':,• •(': ~/:, • ~'
.',-· : ' , : : · • Salvageable eiivfronrhent.~l\ecjuipment such a~. ;ho,ses, ,:wejls, sc1'e,ens, ,ai:id tanksf. will be '.':' , ,,_, ·
; : . · :'; .. · .. ·. '.retiJrne? !o: the 6w~ers;·~efai~eg'b':{Ch~mtrdf!,'.~ispgs~·in)i _St;btitl~ :!) CE~CLA:apprCJved ·; : ''.'.:. '.o.,
·:. ,, . landfill, or, recycle_9.'as scr<1p: · ,Such it~1,1~ p9st-date 'process_ operations.'at·the site, and hence:.,: ·: :(~ '." · .-.,
,:_\::,~ .. ,·.;:::·:fet~~,i;mpa~ra'../:·:(·::·'}: ~,:-.,(/.:::::'.<·:,:·.;<;_(·>~:)-;::,'(.}:~·it/,,·,·:.::::<:/,_'.· ..
·.· ;· , . , ,: _ _,. • R~moyal of the, PC:B'paint and lead~base1 piiint,(building'~oor and_intericir:pedestaJ~) ~\11 pe :··,. , ... , , :·
. . ., , . ·' .. conipl~ted:'. Sand .blasting ,will _be. us_ed _to remove )he··floor·<P_airi: : EitJ'le~ sand 'blasting ·or · : ... :', . . ,
:· •. , ·: ,. , • · · ··1 c~erriicai stripping will'·be\ised'to' removethe Ieao:based:Jiilint; ·': '., ':-° ·,: ' . .' · ) ' .· ·.:: ,.,,, ' · ·. '\ . _ _., ·, '. '
··~. ~ •, ' ': . :· .-~,_,.. ~ }:~//~· :/., :._ .... : : i-. ~•::: ·. _-.. ~~,?~ .. ~-.:.:-~.:; · _:·,'. ;. ~·-. _-';'.,. -~-·:: ~:'., ':\ -'::'/·· · .. :. ~-<)!-'·: ·: -.:•:_.~-;-:t·:• :~.-.<:··: ~-->,:~ /,-_:/ _> __ :_ ~ ' ./ :i, '.,. ~ •:: .:.:.~: _: ...
. . -~: Negative air pressure·_with' HEP,A'.filtj-atfon\willbe used'during·an sand'blasting operatioris._,, . ..::· . ' ."'i\.
i ·. . ,The'.'~and,blasting grit wiii:lfe swept and·vacriumed ·froin.the:an interior:suifaces in~luding. <.''
• .. ·, ;::. : ''.;· '. · ·. \ the_flilpr, -~alls/and ~oo(~~ses .. -Th~_giit !riid paint:tr61Jl 'the Sand ,blasting 6pfaatio'risJ,vill · ·, · ., \ •· '•.
i > .: .... : ... be'managed as D008;F032;--~d:PCB-:'containing solids;"··: 1 ·.;. ~ · -:' < .. "• ... ' . •·: .. , . / :, r·.,
I '-~ • • . -_,, __
-' '1' "-' • • ,; I;,.':• ,-·,' :, Ii ,· ~: ·-. . r ,,, • .. ·-. ' _,.. t.· • _•;.":.·•,~. ,. ; ·, ~ .• . •,. ,
·-i ,;'_.,._,. ,··.·->/!··.·/.~:I~~:.,>:~,_-._~, . .: "1 ,. ·_.,;:~:~,,.:,-.-.. ·.:·, :"•:,:<-.: ... .-.'.~.':{ {.':" • • .. ::·: , ·'.•:·,:·'..: :;_,':\: / :/\.: .,, ';, •·••:,;, ,/ ·,-. 1(11~::::::;:i::~L? . .-:>
,: .. ' '_;:,•.•,, !"·,· •/,· -.._-;• ,' ,',,11 ~ , ,.,•, ·-,,•?'.,l_1 ', ,.~1/J : ',.·:,._:,/_•1·" ·;o ,';
.,.~;·.• -,',"p•~-!-1_-., '1_:~.-,·>:.:,·~:,1?:,.';,_ .... ,·. ,.: __ ·::'~•-.· .. :. ' . . .. ;.
\ ~.,:", • •-~•-' · •'. r,-., '. ·, ~ 'i':,(. · ;.;
•·f ·'·.
. ,·· · . • 1·t
Mr: David• 8. Mattison, CHMM
June 16, 2005 -PageThreei. . . ·' . . . ·. ' . 't '
• Rerrtoval of the ,~~d-based paint from the exteljorcon~~ete pedest;ls :wm be c~m~leted via
either sand• b_lasting. ,:fr: chemical strippi~g. · .The. stripped 6r. saricJcbJasted paint wjll)ie
managed' as a :·listed .hazardous· waste (D008) including appropriate. transportation 'and disposal{ 1. . .. . . . . . . . . . .
, f ' • : • ~' • • • ,. ·~ '
·~. Cau!Riilg of see~s or cracks (if any) i~ th~ fl~o~ ~m be ~0~1plet~d, ;and b·~gs .will.be plac~d.
·. in the three do'o~ays; and.the i1,1teri<ir of the b4ilding wiU be ,p~t:ssur~ washed, coniinencing
' \Vith the roof and . wqrkirig down to C the . fl,oor; 'Th¢ »'ash ~vater will be captured· via '
vacuuming and .will be. containerized and managed· as D008, F032; and PCB0 containing.
:. ,• · • '· , • · ,-., r, · ._·• • •, • · 1-•, • '
,liquids; · ,\' . · -:: · · · · , -
' • ·,The interior, ped~itals ~iii be cut 00~~ t~. the ~pp~oxiinate grade of the fl6hr slab using:
, .: ; masonry sa"Ys and a ja~k hammer, pr. (ither. suitable equipment. Pedestal removal '.will be·.
'co'mpletedto facilitate·demolition of the ouilding .walls. •The\nterior concrete pedestals will
be ~anaged ~s F032 wasie as_a conseniative'_(Le., r.rotective)ineasure; . . . . ·
' • , > • • ' '. , , l · , . : ' " ·· .l ~ ' : . .· . , ., '. • .. " , . r j
• • • ~ • • • •' T ,. • • -~, • ' • • • • • • • • • • • •
· • The pressure-washed galvanized roofing materials and the,"steel roof trusses·.will_be removed, . . . .·
placed inside the building,· arid\yill J;,e :cu_t inio manageable' pieces for ma'n~gement by a . . .
scrap recycler> arid will !Jik~ly be. charged to an ·electric arc· fum,ice at an appropriate· sieel--• • • • 1 ' ' '. • • ' • .-• • ~ makirig facility; -. i ,
. ' .
. ' •''. ·: .,.•.:··· .. _;-... ·· ···. ,··-.· -,~'' ' .. -~ .... -:· .
. • 'Plywoi:id sheeting· will. J;,e .. place'd ·over. the interiorbuil_ding floor to prote9Mhe· floor'during
. waB demoliti,on,.plasticslieets and plywood sheeting wiH be placed.around the exterior of, .··
.. : the'.building. ·The exterior' sheeting will be .placed ·to prevent cont:ictirig,of.demolition debris · ,. .
with the.ground surt'ace;:; · · · .· · · ' · · · · · ' · · · ·
. . .
• • •· • ' • • ' ~ I • ',-c • • • ' •. ; ~ • . ' . • . • • • ' '
• The··brick\yalls will ,be d_emolished _with an excava~or .. ·The walls will be pushed into the -·
interior of the buililing and will be loaded. into· roll-of(boxes for management as an F032 ..
·. ·so)id w,aste stremn; ; -· . . ' . . . , . ,. ; . ,
•. The !)X:terio,r. conc;ete pedestals wiU be ·demolished using an impact hanimer and broken i1:{t~
.manageable pieces.· The exterior pedestal material will be managed as nori~hazardous debris -
. and will b_e disposed at·a Subtitle D CERCLA~approved)andfill; '' ' . . '', '· ,,' ' . ' -..
· · ·· • · The exteri~r-a~il interio;'~oncrete 'pads will be ih6r~ughiy swept to-;emo~e dust and dirt: if
any dam~ge· occurs· io the pads.(which' will re~ain in place).'they ·will 'be repaired via . . .· ' ' . ·,_ ' . . { ' ' . ' -. . . . ' . ' . . -. . . .
pa_tching: A final pressure wash,of the pads will be ·completed .. The pressure-wash water.:-
. will be directed to tlie ,center of th~ pad for,concuri-en_t' v_acuuming. Final wash water will• be'·
' · managed as.F032 a§'a'conservative (i.e., prote'<tive) measure: · · ·
. . :, ' . .' .. ~ • ' • t . - • • . . ... ,
Du~ng the conduct ~f· the de~~lition' activitjes, dust 'contro; 111~~~u~~s 'win b~ used ~ necessa;; to ·. ,
. prevent fugitive·dust·emissicms. :rl)e greatest_ quantity_ of dustwill·be.generated-during' sand blasting ..
r operations. ·As indicated; dust generated' during. the :sand blasting '.activities _will be captured _via.· ...
negativeairpressureandHEPAfiltration. ' ..• _. ",' . ·:' .-. ·.-·· _-· .. IC-,E-~-.: .'._:.·.: . '
. ·~-' ENVIRONMENTAL· .
· ·.-,. ,,:,coRPoRArEo ·_. · ·,_
I • • •., • ' • • •• •• ••, ' . t, . ,-, , ,: •j: · .. ,
I •
' "
' ' '1 , ...
) ' . ·Mr.-David'B. Mattisori, CHMM
-, June I 6;' 2005 _:Page Four·' . :: .
•. '. : . -· . . . ' . '
,AH: ~~ste~ gen~~a_ted :duri_~i. th~ demoliti~n r~ojec:t, will _b~-man~g~d: iri_ acc6rdance. ~ith applicable'
regulations. · Manifesting' of all '.hazardous. and. rion>hazardou:i,• wastes ,will' be completed ..
Representative photographs 'will be taken during the course of the dein9iitionproject..·: .. : _ · .
' . . , ' ~ '
Up~n completion of the project, .a letter report-including copies of, the 'manifests and photographic :
.. documentation will be prepared and provided'to NCDENR and U.S: EPA Regioi1 IV_. The bulleted ·
.. ' ... ite~s previously iisted' essentially constitute the sequeric~ of the demo'iitio~; although it should be
· : : . rioted that sand-b,lasting of\the floor and"interior'.pedestals ~ill be conducted concurreritlf:. As_<
· previously-indicated; 'it is respectfully requested that . the, department':provide_ an approyal letter -
regarding the. planri.ed demolition actiyities at your earliest convenience.· Beazer antii;:ipates initiating
deinolitiqn activities on July '!1, 2005: 'Please do nothesitate'to. call rrie.at 412-208-8860 should you
have any questions or comm~nts regll;fding the ·proposed plan: -. . . . ' . ·. . , ,
Sincerely; ..
'
;.~ ' . ' .
·_:,,.th·, .. _··,:.
Roberti) isher· . , . -· _·,; .. :_ ..
Manag -Waste Management ·operations_.
Beaier East, Inc. · . : · · ·
. '.. '
B. Hudson (USEP A) ' .
M. Helbling (Beaze~f:; · ... .
K. Guenther (Chemtron) ... ·
R. H~b?~d (KEY) · . 1. .
' '·
',
. '
'I .s l ,
. ' '·-!
. •'\
'.I .. \
.. i::,,
~! '
'·-1'.
. ' .
''I'
,_ ·-,.
,1: , ..
, ..
;
., l(&VENVl~ONMENTA~
· ~,INCORPORATED
. '
N NORTii CAROLINA
} =3200
R£rrRfNCE: uses 7.5 WINI/TE TOPOCRAPHIC 0UAllfW,ICU
Of" CIIAAl£STON, SOUTH CNIOUNA, 198J
COS: \'\WORRISVIU£\F1GI-IU,I.DWG
ISSUE DATE:
ROSSLYN FARMS
IHOUSTIIW. PARK 1200 AACH ST .• sun: 200
CARNEGIE. PA 15108
BEAZER EAST, INC.
PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA
~:~: : :~; :~~~~: IC!~'IINVl~IDITAL
APPO: JSZ o:: 5/3/05 INCIORl"ORATaD
SCALE:
CONFIRMATION SAMPLING & ANALYSIS PLAN BUILDING DEMOLITION
FORMER CELLON PROCESS BUILDING
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE LOCATION MAP
OAAWING NUlolBER 05-058
FIGURE 1
• •
Photo No. 1 -Cellon Process Building and Exterior Pedestals -Facing South
Photo No. 2 -Cellon Process Building -Facing North
• •
Photo No. 3 -Cellon Process Building -Facing West
Photo No. 4 -Cellon Process Building -Facing East
• •
Photo No. 5 -Exterior Equipment Pedestals -Facing East
Photo No. 6 -General Interior View -Facing South
• •
Photo No. 7 -General Interior View with Interior Pedestals -Facing North
Photo No. 8 -General Interior View -Facing South (Trusses/Root)
• •
Photo No. 9 -East Wall Stained Area Scraping ("Before") -Facing East
Photo No. 10 -East Wall Completed Scraping ("After")-Facing East
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF PRE-DEMOLITION BUILDING SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS RESULTS
FORMER CELLON PROCESS BUILDING AND APPURTENANCES
BEAZER EAST, INC. SITE -MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Constituent Sample ID Sample Description and General Location Sampled Sampling Analytical
of lnterestl11 Number By Date Result
P-1 Orange paint scrape sample -exterior concrete pedestals RETEC 01/18/05 119,000
P-2 Blue paint scrape sample -north double entry doors RETEC 01/18/05 3,750
P-3 Silver paint scrape sample -steel beams next to doors RETEC 01/18/05 895
Lead P-4 Orange paint scrape sample -interior concrete pedestals RETEC 01/18/05 237,000
P-5 White paint scrape sample -east wall of building RETEC 01/18/05 44.6
P-6 Blue paint scrape sample -process vessel RETEC 01/18/05 49.8
MV-FS-01 Blue paint scrape sample -floor at south end of building KEY 04/06/05 4,320
MV-TS-01 Steel truss wipe sample -near center of building KEY 04/07/05 0.0000018
MV-TS-02 Steel truss wipe sample -north end of building KEY 04/07/05 0.0000052
MV-RS-01 Galvanized roofing wipe sample -north end of building KEY 04/07/05 0.00005 u(4>
MV-RS-01 Galvanized roofing wipe sample -southeast comer of building KEY 04/07/05 0.00005 U
MV-BS-01-01 White paint scrape sample -south wall of building (stain) KEY 04/07/05 79
MV-BS-01-02 Brick dust sample (1 /8-inch depth) -south wall of building KEY 04/07/05 2.7
MV-BS-01-03 Brick dust sample (1/4-inch depth) -south wall of building KEY 04/07/05 0.94
PCP MV-BS-02-01 White paint scrape sample -east wall of building (stain) KEY 04/07/05 12.000
MV-BS-02-02 Brick dust sample (1/8-inch depth) -east wall of building KEY 04/07/05 11
MV-BS-02-03 Brick dust sample (1 /4-inch depth) -east wall of building KEY 04/07/05 2
MV-BS-03-01 White paint scrape sample -east wall of building (stain) KEY 04/07/05 2,700
MV-BS-03-02 Brick dust sample (1/8-inch depth) -east wall of building KEY 04/07/05 30
MV-BS-03-03 Brick dust sample (1/4-inch depth) -east wall of building KEY 04/07/05 81
MV-BS-04-01 White paint scrape sample -north wall of building (clean) KEY 04/07/05 13
MV-BS-04-02 Brick dust sample (1/8-inch depth) -north wall of building KEY 04/07/05 1.6 U
MV-BS-04-03 Brick dust sample (1/4-inch depth) -north wall of building KEY 04/07/05 1.6 U
PCBs(5> MV-FS-01 Blue paint scrape sample -floor at south end of building KEY 04/06/05 88
Notes:
1. Constituents of Interest: PCP = Pentachlorophenol; PCBs = total Polychlorinated Biphenyls.
2. Standard for lead is lead-based paint standard of 0.5%. PCP and PCB standards are Universal Treatment Standards per 40 CFR 268.48.
3. NA - No applicable criteria for wipe sample results.
4. U = Not detected at the detection limit indicated.
5. Result is sum of Aroclor 1254 (34 mg/kg) and Aroclor 1260 (32 mg/kg).
Units Standard(2>
{ma/Kn\
ma/Ka
ma/Ka
ma/Ka
ma/Ka 5000
ma/Ka
ma/Ka
ma/Ka
ma/cm2
ma/cm2 NA(3l
ma/cm2
ma/cm2
ma/Ka
ma/Ka
ma/Ka
ma/Ka
ma/Ka
ma/Ka 7.4
ma/Ka
ma/Ka
ma/Ka
ma/Ka
ma/Ka
ma/Ka
ma/Ka 10
• •
ATTACHMENT A
Raleigh (Morrisville) Demolition Project
Scope of Work /Work Plan
The demolition work associated with the former treatment building will be performed by
Chemtron Corporation (Chemtron) located in Avon, Ohio. Chemtron has a National Services
Agreement with Beazer East Inc. (Beazer) and performs many of Beazer's multi-disciplined
environmental projects. Chemtron is a premier provider of environmental services and offers
a network of capabilities that include plant demolition, industrial maintenance, site
remediation and excavation, confined space entry, disposal and transportation, UST/AST
cleaning and removal, and provides emergency response capabilities industry wide,
including the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency. Chemtron's US EPA ID Number is
OHO 066 060 609. Construction oversight will be provided by Key Environmental, Inc.
Treatment Building
• Mobilization will consist of mobilizing all necessary equipment and field personnel
with the required training and necessary environmental certificates. A Site
specific Health and Safety Plan will be prepared by the contractor and a ''tail
gate" safety meeting will be conducted prior to commencement to address all
potential hazards associated with each task to be performed.
• Initially, clearing and grubbing will be completed and all salvageable materials
(i.e., hoses, well screens, and tanks) will be recovered. Vegetative material will
be managed at a CERCLA-approved Subtitle D facility (along with concrete from
the exterior pedestals, as subsequently discussed). Recovered equipment will
be salvaged for reuse, for management as scrap, or for disposal at the CERCLA-
approved Subtitle D landfill. The entire building will be swept clean of all dirt and
miscellaneous debris. The material will be placed into DOT-approved containers
and staged for off-site disposal. As a precautionary measure, the drummed
material will be managed as an F032, 0008 and PCB waste stream.
• The building will then undergo containment, and negative air pressure with HEPA
filtration will be set up to execute sand blasting of the interior concrete pedestals
(lead based paint) and the interior painted concrete floor to remove floor paint
containing low level PCBs. Upon completion of the sand blasting effort, the roof,
trusses, walls, and concrete floor will be swept and vacuumed . Any seems or
cracks (e.g., where the walls me the floor slab) will be sealed with caulking and
the interior of the building will be pressure washed. The spent sand blasting
material and wash water will be containerized in DOT-approved containers and
staged on site for off-site disposal. The drummed material will be managed as an
F032, 0008 and PCB-containing material.
• The interior pedestals will be cut down to the approximate grade of the floor slab
using masonry saws and a jack hammer, or other suitable equipment. Pedestal
removal will be completed to facilitate demolition of the building walls. The
pedestal concrete will be managed as F032 waste as a conservative measure.
• •
• The roof of the building (galvanized sheeting and steel trusses) will be removed
and placed inside the building. The steel will be then be cut into manageable
pieces and shipped off-site to a steel recycler.
• Plywood sheeting will be placed over the interior building floor to protect the floor
during wall demolition, plastic sheets and plywood sheeting will be placed around
the exterior of the building. The exterior sheeting will be placed to prevent
contacting of demolition debris with the ground surface;
• The brick walls of the building will be demolished with an excavator by pushing
the walls into the interior of the structure. The debris will be directly loaded into
roll-off containers for off-site disposal as an F032 waste stream. (The concrete
floor of the building will remain in place.)
• The floor will be thoroughly swept and any damage to the concrete floor resulting
from pedestal or wall demolition will be repaired. Final pressure washing of the
floor will be completed. Wash water will be directed to the center of the floor
where it will be captured with a vacuum.
Note: All drummed material produced from the building demolition project will be
transported for disposal to Clean Harbors incinerator located in Deer Park, Texas. All of the
brick walls and concrete pedestals located within the building will be transported for land fill
disposal (under the debris ruling) to EQ Industrial Services, Inc. CERCLA approved Subtitle
"C" landfill located in Belleville, Michigan.
Exterior Concrete Structures/Pedestals
• Lead based paint will be removed from the six (6) exterior concrete structures via
chemical removal or sand blasting. If sand blasting is utilized to remove the lead
based paint, the concrete pedestals will be enclosed within a containment unit
and negative air will be set up. The spent sand blasting material will be
containerized in DOT approved containers and staged on site for off-site
disposal. The drummed material will be managed as a D008 waste material. If a
chemical paint stripper is utilized to remove the lead paint, it will be comprised of
non-flammable gel that contains no methylene chloride, caustic or other harsh
chemicals. Subsequent to sufficient setup time, the gel will be removed via
scraping and containerized in DOT approved containers and staged on site for
off-site disposal. The drummed material will be managed as a D008 waste
material and transported to Chemtron for subsequent disposal.
• The exterior concrete structures will then be broken in to manageable pieces and
loaded into roll-offs for off site disposal to Allied Waste/BFI Brunswick Waste
Management CERCLA approved Subtitle "D" landfill facility located in
Lawrenceville, Virginia.
• The concrete pad will be swept and pressure washed in a manner similar to that
used for the building pad, as previously discussed.
FW: Photographs • •
I of I
Subject: FW: Photographs
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09: 17:49 -0400
From: "Fisher, Bob \(Pittsburgh\) NA" <FisherB@ hansonle.com>
To: <l)avid.Mattison@nc mail.net>
CC: "Helbling, Mike \(Pittsburgh\) NA" <[e-mail]>
Hi David: Just an quick update on the proposed demolition activities of the former Koppers treatment building:
Pursuant with our recent site visit to assess the various remedial operations associated with demolition activities, I
have elected to perform some additional sampling of the walls and floor of the former treatment building prior to
developing a Scope of Work for demolition activities. As you recall, I felt that sandblasting the interior walls and floor
would remove potential Penta contamination. To ensure that effort will be cost effective, I have contracted with Key
Environmental Inc. (KEY) to perform an additional sampling effort (scraping and coring) of the brick interior walls to
ascertain penetration depth of potential Penta contamination. I also requested Key to obtain wipe samples of the
steel roof members and analyze for Penta. Since RETEC did not sample the epoxy painted floor during their earlier
sampling effort, I had Key obtain samples of the floor and perform analysis for lead. As you can see from the
photographs, the sampling effort performed by Key was exceptionally well done and professionally executed. I'll pass
the analytical results along when I receive them.
Regards,
Bob Fisher
412-208-8860 office
412-327-3667 cell
-----Original Message-----
From: Bert Hubbard [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 1:14 PM
To: Fisher, Bob (Pittsburgh) NA
Cc: Jim Zubrow
Subject: Photographs
Bob,
Sampling went well. Photographs are attached. As indicated by JZ, major stains remedied to some extent via
sampling.
Bert
1 Name: Morrisville NC BldgPhotos.pdf
Type: Portable Document Format (applicati on/pdf)
Encoding: base64 ~Monisville NC BldgPhotos.pdf
Description: Morri sville NC BldgPhotos.pdf
Download Status: Not downloaded with message .__ ____________ _,__ ___ _
04/13/2005 7:46 AM
• •
North Wall -East Corner
North Wall at Doors
• •
North Wall -West Comer
West Wall -North End I
• • \ \ ~ West Wall -North End 2 West Wall -South of Window
• •
West Wall -South Comer
• • South Wall - West
• •
South Wall -Center
• • South Wall -East
• •
East Wall -South Corner
East Wall -North of South Corner
• •
East Wall at Door
East Wall -North Comer
• •
Floor Area to be Scraped
Floor Scraping in Progress
• •
Floor Scraping Completed -Facing South
Floor Scraping Completed -Facing West
• •
Truss Wipe Sample MV-TS-01 Location Setup
MV-TS-01 Wipe Sample Location
• •
Truss Wipe Sampling in Progress
Truss Sample MV-TS-02 Location Setup
• •
MV-TS-02 Wipe Sample Location
Corrugated Roof -Representative Photo
• •
Roof Wipe Sample MV-RS-01 Setup
MV-RS-01 Wipe Sample Location
• •
Roof Wipe Sample MV-RS-02 Setup
MV-RS-02 Wipe Sample Location
• •
North Wall -Clean Area Sample Location MV-BS-04
North Wall -Clean Area Scraping I
• •
North Wall -Clean Area Scraping 2
North Wall -Clean Area Drilling
• •
South Wall -Stained Area MV-BS-01 Sample Location
South Wall -Stained Area Scraping Sample MV-BS-01-01
• •
South Wall -Stained Area Scraping Sample MV-BS-01-01
South Wall -Complete Scraping at MV-BS-01 Location
• •
South Wall -I/8th Drilling Sample MV-BS-01-02
South Wall -1/4 inch Drilling Sample MV-BS-01-02
• •
East Wall -Stained Area MV-BS-02 Sample Location
• •
East Wall -Stained Area Scraping Sample MV-BS-02-01
East Wall -Stained Area Scraping Sample MV-BS-02-01
• •
East Wall -1/4 inch Drilling Sample MV-BS-02-03
• •
East Wall -Second Stained Area Sample Location MV-BS-03
East Wall -Second Stained Area Sample Location MV-BS-03
• •
East Wall -Second Stained Area Scraping Sample MV-BS-03-01
East Wall -Second Stained Area Scraping Sample MV-BS-03-01
• •
Post Sampling Building Cleanup
Post Sampling Building Cleanup
• •
Post Sampling Building Cleanup
• Fisher, Bob (Pittsburgh) NA
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mark Westray [[e-mail]]
Monday, February 21, 2005 4:15 PM
Fisher, Bob (Pittsburgh) NA
Helbling, Mike (Pittsburgh) NA
results of paint sample analyses, Morrisville, NC site
Paint sample 511.. Report No. P-6 Interior ·P-2 Doors Blue P-3 Interior P-4 Interior P-5 Interior P-1 Exterior
~suits.xis (19 K.SB010209.pdf (mk Blue Paint.J•aint.JPG (606 .!am Silver Paintange Paint.JPG alls White Paintange Paint.JPG
Bob -The
attached Excel file provides a summary of the lead data from the analysis of paint samples
collected from the selected areas of the f ormer Penta Building at the Morrisville site.
Only 2 samples exceeded the 0.5% threshold lead concentration f o r LBP; P-1, which was the
orange paint collected from the concrete pedestals outside the building; and P-4, which
was the orange paint collected from the interior concrete pedestals.
(See attached file: Paint sample results.xls)
Also attached is the lab report from STL :
(See attached file: STL Report No. CSB010209.pdf)
Finally, here are pictures of each sampling location:
(See attached file: P-6 Interior Tank Blue Paint.JPG) (See attached file: P-2 Doors Blue
Paint .JPG) (See attached file: P-3 Interior Beam Silver Paint.JPG) (See attached file : P-4
Interior Orange Paint .JPG) (See attached
file : P-5 Interior Walls White Paint.JPG) (See attached file: P-1 Exterior Orange
Paint.JPG)
As I mentioned to you, Dave Mattison (the case manager at DENR) has offered to meet with
us at the site to look over the building and discuss possible approaches to
precharacterization and/or decontamination prior to demolition. Mike Helbling has
indicated that he would like to participate in t hese discussions. Let me know a couple of
dates when you and he would be available. I can then contact Dave to see if these dates
will work for his schedule. It would probably be best to give him 2 -weeks advance notice.
Let me know if you have any questions/comments.
Regards -Mark
Mark Westray
The RETEC Group, Inc .
1822 East NC Highway 54, Suite 100
Durham, North Carolina 2771 3
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
1
Site:
Media Sampled:
Date Sampled:
Analyses:
Sample ID
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
P-6
• •
Beazer Morrisville
Exterior and interior paint samples from former "Penta" Building
28-Jan-05
Lead by EPA 6010
Sample Lead Concentration
Description/Location (mg/Kg)
Orange paint from exterior
concrete pedestals 119000
Blue paint from double entry
doors 3750
Silver paint from interior steel
beams next to doors 895
Orange paint from interior
concrete pedestals 237000
White paint from interior walls 44.6
Blue paint from tank inside
building 49.8
Note: "Lead-Based Paint" is paint with a lead content > 0.5% (5000 mg/Kg)
• '· -
...... ~ .
' ' -:.-. ..... ,.
• .. ,\, * I
•
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Morrisville. Raleigh
Lot#, C5B010209
Gregory Malzone
The RETEC Group Inc
SEVERN TRENT LABORATORIES, INC.
Veronica Bertot
Project Manager
February 14·, 2005
•
sn Pittsburgh
450 William Pitt Wct;1
Pittsburgh, PA 15238
STL
Tele 412 820 8380 Fax, 412 820 2080
www.stl-inc.com
Severn Trent Laboratories, Inc.
• • . I . STL
NELAC REPORTING:
The format and content of the attached report meets NELAC standards and guidelines except as
noted in the narrative. The table below presents a summary of the certifications held by STL
Pittsburgh. Our primary accreditation authority for the Non-potable water and Solid & Hazardous
waste programs is New York Staie DOH. A more detailed parameter list is available upon request.
Please ask your project manager[tor this information when required. .
~):W,1,~itl.'ft ;!{0WiSCOfiSin'{~t~11·-•' ,~~i;i'.f:":t,H:?~,J!l]'ii"& "::~''.:""',998027t800~"1~~~;f '.{iJiii~fJ!;.tif¾WW.~:,i;;-:~;JtJS~f~l;fi?{l~i'<!J~-"~;t,-:,,r;c;x}?_ . 1l,1:i;m1~'I:!'l:~fif1-,, · 'PMf1;fm.,."1~~1t;ffe~~~: · ~t~*~~·~ ~ _;.:;.-~-.. ~~-~Et~?--..,··¾(.? ~;sF.ifi,;;"-"?ff.lPw•·a·~lt~i½?:i;tr~;:::~~~~" J:."x"'F. ~~""'-.. ""· , ,s;,,,,"""'·~'~'-•· ... ,,,.,,.,,.,_8 .,, ... ,_,,,,, _., .,,.,.-.,,,-__ · ... fo>ls!',,"'"'·'"""• · ,._,,,,,-,c;;7$! ,,,.~'¾«'•• .~, .,,.
. I The codes utilized for program types are described below:
HW Hazardous Waste certification I
WW Non-potable Water and/or Wastewater Certification
X Laboratory has some form of certlfic:ation under the specific program. Many states certify laboratories for specific parameters or
tests within a category. The information in the table indicates the lab is certified in a general category of testing. Please contact
the laboratory If parameter specific Certification information is required.
PADEP Lab Registration for STL Pittsbubh is 02-416
I
•
Sample Receiving:
CASE NARRATIVE
THE RETEC GROUP
Raleigh
STL Lot# CSBOI 0209
•
STL Pittsburgh, PA received one sample on February I, 2005. The cooler was received
at ambient temperature.
If project specific QC was not required for samples contained in this report and batch QC
was completed on these sadiples, anomalous results will be discussed below.
Metals:
Several samples were analyzed at a dilution for lead.
The concentration of lead dliected in the method blank was greater than the reporting
limit. All associated sampl6 results had a lead concentration greater then 20X the method
blank concentration for lead. All results were reported.
•
PARAMETER
I
•
METHODS SUMMARY
C5B010209
ANALYTICAL
METHOO
Trace Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Metals SW846 6010B
References:
PREPARATION
METHOD
SW846 3050B
SW846 11 T·est Methods forl Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods", Third Edition, November 1986 and its updates.
• •
SAMPLE SUMMARY
CSB010209
SAMPLED SAMP
WO# SAMPLE# CLIENT SAMPLE ID DATE TIME ----
G3J2T 001 P-1 01/28/05 11:15
G3J2W 002 P-2 01/28/05 11:30
G3J2X 003 P-3 01/28/05 11:45
G3J20 004 P-4 01/28/05 12:00
G3J21 005 P-5 01/28/05 12:15
G3J23 006 P-6 01/28/05 12:30
NOTE(S)
-The analytical results of 1he samples listed above arc presented 1on the following pages.
• All calculations arc performed bt:fore rounding to avoid round!off errors in calculaled result.s.
• Resul!s noted as "ND" were not. detet1ed at or above the stated I limit.
-Tbis rcpon must not be reproduced, except in full, without the!written approval of the laborat.0ry.
-ResulLS for the following parameters are never reported on a d7 weight basis: color, corrosivity, density, flashpoint, ignitability, layers, odor,
paint filter test, pH, porosiry pressure, reactivity, red ox potential, specific gravity, spot tests, solids, solubility, temperature, viscosity, and weight.
.
ThermoRetec
Chain of Custody Record 2354 North Carolina Corporation
127 Kingston Drive, Suite 105 • Chapel Hill, NC 27514-1650
[phone] Phone • [phone] Fa:,,: 0 ThermoRetec
www the1mo1etec com Smart Solutions. Positive Outcomes.
Project Name: fX. -,_,,.,_ 77 ... ~ VV'J'"' f ,,.. ;< v.1JI, Project Number, AC 11.:,. '") -/ 'i/':,+ '{ -/ / /)
Pag,_L_of_l_ Send Report To:/-c;....-.,,. m,. r _ . Sampler (Priat Name), fVJ,;v, k /,,.Jrc;,.fr,;..
fd.15 n=+ . b -Address: Sampler (Print Name); ., .
/J '-
3n yJ1) I. 7/ l/1~,-,.,, P;HtJ,.,. Shipment Method: Ped~x. &-~ ,:,
P; itslo,~.a-C PA /r,23'7 I Airbill Number, ,SL{ r-3 ":J-1 '+-,1: -:;':3 C, _c;""
_,,
is ff I Purchase
Phoaec t/ f 2: 'x Z(,, _ 5 3 'f ,:, Laboratory Receiving: ffl -Pl tf-s'b 1--\,f"r L "" Order fl"
Fax: 1..1,-, 'yl.,1 --' l( ~ q '-J
Field Sample ID . Sample Sample Sample Number of· V, I Comme11ts, Special Lab Sample IO
Date Time Matrix Containers Instructions, etc. (to be completed by lab)
p_ l I f 'J..~'/, ,. -11,,1 c-/1. r~r:;. I 'l
.il-1. ' 11·::3~-K __ J_ -,-'lC ----
{-l-7i I I' t/,;1. I i.
IO•-v{ 12.N I X. r-r 12.:1~--P I X. ~e ( ,, , II /7_ ·,?,,, i •II I )(
§,/4 zig;a !"re) 1 Received by: (Signature) Date: Time: Sample Custodiari Remarks (Completed By Laboratory):
t:'e.#e"K. ;h,J!ot, Sample Receipt "/'/(...-::✓.. r~~uP.4 QA/QC level Turnaround .'1-. 'i V.
Total # Containers Received? Rlrtmt.shed by: 1Slgnature) lkf!J'lll,J ·□ ate: Time:
p/, lo) level I □ Routine □ COC Seals Present?
09'fr level II □ 24 Hour □ COC Seals Intact?
Relinquished by: (Signature) Received by: (51gnature) Date: Time: level III □ 1 Week □ Received Containers Intact?
Other □ Other --Temperature?
White: Lab Copy Yellow: PM Copy Pink: field Copy Gold: PM/QA/QC Copy
•
•
•
Lot-Sample ff .•• : C5B010209-001
Date Sampled ... : 01/28/05
% Moisture ..... :
PARAMETER RESULT
Prep Batch# ... : 5034075
Lead 119000 J
The RETEC Group, Inc.
Client Sample ID: P-1
TOTAL Metals
•
Date Received .. : 02/01/05
REPORTING
Matrix ....... : WASTE
PREPARATION-WORK
' UMIT UNITS METHOD ANALYSIS DATE ORDER #
I SW846 6010B 02/09-02/11/05 G3J2T1AA
NOTE(S):
75 .o mg/kg
Dilltion Faccor, 250 Analysis Time .. : 15:28 MS Run# ...
J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank &imains the target analyie at a reportable kvel.
•
Lot-Sample# ... , C5B010209-002
Date Sampled ... , 01/28/05
% Moisture ..... :
PARAMETER RESULT
Prep Batch# ... , 5034075
Lead 3750 J
NOTE (S) ,
The RETEC Group, Inc.
Client Sample ID, P-2
TOTAL Metals
•
Date Received .. , 02/01/05
REPORTING
' UMIT UNITS
7.5 mg/kg
Factor: 25
METHOD
SWB46 6010B
Analysis Time .. : 10: 19
J Method hlank contamination. The associated method blank 6omains lhe target analyle at a reportable level.
Matrix ....... , WASTE
PREPARATION-WORK
ANALYSIS DATE ORDER#
02/09-02/11/05 G3J2WlAA
MS Run# ....... :
•
Lot-Sample# ... : C5B010209-003
Date Sampled ... : 01/28/05
% Moisture ..... :
PARAMETER RESULT
Prep Batch# ... : 5034075
Lead 895 J
NOTE(S):
•
The RETEC Group, Inc.
Client Sample ID: P-3
TOTAL Metals
Date Received .. : 02/01/05
REPORTING
rJIMIT UNITS
mg/kg
Factor: 10
METHOD
SW846 6010B
Analysis Time .. : 10:30
J Method blank contamination. The associated method h!ank l:om.ains the target ana\y1e ai a reportable leveL
Matrix ....... : WASTE
PREPARATION-WORK
ANALYSIS DATE ORDER#
02/09-02/11/05 G3J2X1AA
MS Run #.
•
Lot-Sample# ... , C5B010209-004
Date Sampled ... , 01/28/05
% Moisture ..... :
PARAMETER RESULT
Prep Batch# ... , 5034075
Lead 237000 J
•
The RETEC Group, Inc.
Client Sample ID, P-4
TOTAL Metals
Matrix ....... , WASTE
Date Received .. , 02/01/05
REPORTING PREPARATION-WORK
:LlIMIT UNITS ===----METHOD ANALYSIS DATE ORDER#
10 mg/kg SW846 6010B 02/09-02/11/05 G3J201AA
DilJtion Factor: 500 Analysis Time. 15:16 MS Run#.
NOTE(S), I
J Method blank contamination. The associau:d method blank ~ont.ains the target analyte a1 a reportable level.
•
Lot-Sample# ... : C5B010209-005
Date Sampled ... , 01/28/05
% Moisture ..... :
PARAMETER RESULT
Prep Batch# ... , 5034075
Lead 44.6 J
The RETEC Group, Inc.
Client Sample ID: P-5
TOTAL Metals
•
Date Received .. : 02/01/05
REPORTING
' LIMIT ~UN=I~T~S ___ ~M~E~TH~O~D _____ _
I 0.30 SWB46 6010B
NOTE (S) :
Dili"ion
mg/kg
Factor: 1 Analysis Time .. : 20:26
J Method blank contamination. The associated method blank comains the targe[ analytc at a reportable le11el.
Matrix ....... : WASTE
PREPARATiON-WORK
ANALYSIS DATE ORDER #
02/09-02/10/0S G3J211AA
MS Run # .. -
•
Lot-Sample# ... , C5B010209-006
Date Sampled ... : 01/28/05
% Moisture ..... :
PARAMETER RESULT
Prep Batch# ... : 5034075
Lead 49.8 J
The RETEC Group, Inc.
Client Sample ID: P-6
TOTAL Metals
•
Date Received .. : 02/01/05
Matrix ....... : WASTE
REPORTING PREPARATION-WORK
' LIMIT UN=I~T~S=----METHOD ANALYSIS DATE ORDER #
I 0 .30 mg/kg SW846 6010B 02/09-02/10/05 G3J231AA
NOTE(S}:
Dil,tion Factor, 1 Analysis Time .. : 20,32 MS Run#.
J Melhod hlank contaminmion. The associated melhod blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.
•
Client Lot# ... , C5B010209
METHOD BLANK REPORT
TOTAL Metals
•
Matrix ......... : WASTE
REPORTING PREPARATION-WORK
' =-PARAM===E=T=E'-'-R,__ ___ RESULT LIMIT UN==-IT=.S,c_ __ ~ME=T=H=O=D ______ ANALYSIS DATE ORDER #
MB Lot-Sample
Lead
NOTE(S),
#, C5B030000-0751 Prep Batch # ••. ,
0.65 0.30 mg/kg
I Dilution Factor: 1
I . • Anrysis Tome .. , 19,5B_
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results.
5034075
SWB46 601.0B 02/09-02/1.0/05 G3NNV1.AA
•
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE EVALUATION REPORT
TOTAL Metals
Lot-Sample# ... , C5B010209 Matrix ......... : WASTE
PARAMETER
Lead
NOTE(S),
PERCENT
RECOVERY
102
107
RECOVERY RPD
LIMITS I RPD LIMITS
(80 -120) ' (BO -120) 4. 7 (0-20) I Dilution ~actor: 1
Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated rcS1.1\1s.
PREPARATION-
~M~ET~H~O~De:..... _____ ANALYSIS DATE
SW846 6010B 02/09-02/10/05
SW846 6010B 02/09-02/10/05
Analysis Time .. : 20:04
PREP-
BATCH#
5034075
5034075