NCD095458527_20020718_FCX Inc. (Statesville)_FRBCERCLA LTAR_LTAR Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report November 2001 - April 2002 OU-1-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Document Control No. RFW133-2A-ALIJ
Revision 0
LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION
APRIL 2002
SEMI-ANNUAL SAMPLING EVENT REPORT
(NOVEMBER 2001 THROUGH APRIL 2002)
FCX-ST ATESVILLE OPERABLE UNIT 1
GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Work Assignment No. 133-RALR-048M
July 2002
REGION 5
U.S. EPA CONTRACT NO. 68-W7-0026
Weston Solutions, Inc.
Suite 200
5405 Metric Place
Norcross, Georgia 30092
WESTON W.O. No. 20064.133.100.0930
NOR/K:\WP\20064\133\Apr2002-2nd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Prepared By:
Approved By:
Approved By:
Approved By:
LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION
APRIL 2002
SEMI-ANNUAL SAMPLING EVENT REPORT
(NOVEMBER 2001 THROUGH APRIL 2002)
REVISION0
FCX-ST A TESVILLE OPERABLE UNIT 1
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
U.S. EPA Contract No. 68-W?-0026
Work Assignment No. l 33-RALR-048M
Document Control No. RFWl 33-2A-ALIJ
July 2002
Date: _'7,_,/,_~! _r4-j__co-'2...=--/
N Site Manager
~~ ~alphP.McKeen, P.E.
Date: ? k /2-2 ---,,~~----
WESTON Quality Assurance
~tf:tt£t¼
Program Manager
Date: ~/2'+"~"'-1-/4~.J-__
Date: --------Ken Mallary
EPA Region 4 Remedial Project Manager
NOR/K:\ WP\20064\l 33\Apr2002 -2nd semi-annual rpt.doc RFWJ33-2A-ALU
This document was pn..-pared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express written
permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Section
1
2
3
4
5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
Page
INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1-1
I. I
1.2
1.3
1.4
Purpose .................................................................................................... 1-1
Background ............................................................................................. 1-1
Lithology and Hydrogeology .................................................................. 1-5
Long-Term Response Action .................................................................. I-7
LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION .............................................................. 2-1
2.1
2.2
Operation and Maintenance (O&M) ....................................................... 2-1
Groundwater Monitoring ......................................................................... 2-1
L TRA SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 3-1
3.1 Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Summary ....................................... 3-1
3.2 Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event -April 2002 ............................... 3-3
3.2.1 Groundwater Monitoring ................................................................... 3-3
3.2.1.1
3.2.1.2
Monitoring well Sample Results ........................................... 3-3
QA/QC Sample Results ......................................................... 3-6
3.2.2 Treatment System Monitoring ........................................................... 3-6
3.2.2.1
3.2.2.2
3.2.2.3
Water Level Elevations ......................................................... 3-7
Treatment System Results ..................................................... 3-9
POTW Discharge ................................................................ 3-10
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................... 4-1
REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 5-1
NOR/K:\WP\20064\133\Apr2002 -2nd semi-.annual rpt.doc RFW I 33·2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written pennission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Title
Site Location Map
Site Map
LIST OF FIGURES
Shallow Aquifer Potentiometric Surface Map
Alpha-BHC Concentration Map
Beta-BHC Concentration Map
Gamma-BHC Concentration Map
Heptachlor Epoxide Concentration Map
I, 1-Dichlorocthane (DCA) Concentration Map
Chloroform Concentration Map
Tctrachloroethene (PCE) Concentration Map
Trichloroethene (TCE) Concentration Map
Chromium Concentration Map
Manganese Concentration Map
Vanadium Concentration Map
Quick Flow Model Results-November 2001
Quick Flow Model Results-December 2001
Quick Flow Model Results -January 2002
Quick Flow Model Results -February 2002
Quick Flow Model Results -March 2002
Quick Flow Model Results -April 2002
Quick Flow Model Results -November 2001 through April 2002
NOR/K:\WP'l200641133\J\pr2002 -2nd sc-mi-annual rpt.dtx: 11 RFW J 33-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statcsvillc Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Table
2
3
4
5
6
7
LIST OFT ABLES
Title
Groundwater Remediation Levels
Summary of Monitoring Well Analytical Results
Water Level Data
Modeling Data
Influent and Effluent Results
Recovery Well Flow Meter Readings-Cubic Feet
Recovery Well Flow Meter Readings-Gallons
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A-City Discharge Permit
APPENDIX B-System Check Forms
APPENDIX C-Purge Forms
APPENDIX D-Charts Traffic Reports and Chain of Custody
APPENDIX E-Laboratory Analytical Reports
APPENDIX F -Trend Analyses Charts
APPENDIX G-Depth to Water Charts
NOR/K:\WP..20064\133\Apr2002 -2nd semi-annual rpt.doc Ill RFW133-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., c.iprcssly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.1 PURPOSE
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
EPA Region 4 tasked Weston Solutions, Inc., formerly Roy F. Weston, Inc., (WESTON@) to
perform the Long Term Response Action (LTRA) at the Farmers Cooperative Exchange (FCX)-
Statesville site, Operable Unit One (OU!) in Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina The
work is being performed under the Region 5 Response Action Contract (RAC) No. 68-W7-0026.
The L TRA includes performing weekly operation and maintenance of a pump and treat system
designed to capture and treat groundwater contaminated with pesticides and volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and semi-annual groundwater sampling of a network of 18 monitoring
wells.
1.2 BACKGROUND
The following information comes from the January 24, 2000 Statement of Work. The FCX-
Statesville property is located at the intersection of Phoenix Street and West Front Street
(Highway 90) approximately 1.5 miles west of downtown Statesville. The Site is approximately
5.5 acres in size. The coordinates of the Site are 35°47'11" north and 80°54'58" west. The Site is
bound to the north by the Norfolk-Southern Railroad and Burlington Industries (formerly
Beaunit Mills), to the west by the Carnation Milk Company property, to the south by residential
and small businesses, and to the east by a prefabricated utility and sales lot (Figure I).
Beginning around 1940, FCX began operations as an agricultural distribution center. These
operations included the formulation, repackaging, warehousing, and distribution of farm
chemicals, primarily pesticides and fertilizers, along with the milling and sale of feed grains. The
repackaging of liquid pesticides was discontinued in 1966 and dust repackaging in 1969.
NOIVK:\WP\20064\l33\Apr2002 -2nd snni-annual rpc.doc 1-1 RFWIJJ-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Wcslon Solutions, Inc., e,prcssly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
wriucn pennission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Second Scmi•Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesvillc Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
[hte: July 2002
The following information comes from the January 1999 Remedial Action Report. The site is
currently abandoned. The dominant on-site structure is a warehouse located on the western half
of the property. The warehouse consists of two attached structures: an upper building,
constructed in 1968 or 1970, and a smaller, lower building constructed in I 982. The area south
of the warehouse is paved except for a narrow grass strip along the sidewalk. The eastern half of
the site is dominated by a large concrete pad, 6 inches to 7 inches thick, 62 feet wide, and 190
feet long, extending from the eastern end of the warehouse along the north property line. The
area south of the pad is covered almost entirely with approximately 6 to 12 inches of crushed,
compacted gravel. Several smaller areas within this area, mostly tractor-trailer pads and parking
area, are paved with either concrete or asphalt. The area, except for the paved area between the
warehouse and West Front Street, is completely fenced, mostly with chain-link fencing. The
fence is in good condition and access is gained via Phoenix Street through a 36-foot-wide gate
along the eastern end of the site. The gate is locked with a heavy chain and padlock.
During the summer and early fall of 1991, U.S. EPA Region IV, conducted an in-house Phase I
RI at FCX. The investigation involved extensive sampling (237 samples) of on-and off-site soil,
groundwater, surface water, and sediment. Significant findings relating to groundwater
contamination are summarized in this section.
Samples from on-site monitoring wells indicated that both the surficial (saprolite) and bedrock
portions of the groundwater system beneath the site are contaminated with pesticides, primarily
lindane, BHC compounds, endrin ketone, and chlordane.
A variety of chlorinated solvents were detected in groundwater samples from on-site monitoring
wells, as well as the process well located on the Carnation property west of the site. The highest
level of contaminant observed was tetrachloroethylene (PCE), with concentrations in excess of
I 00 micrograms per liter (µg/L) being detected.
Phase II of the FCXS RI was primarily an expanded investigation of grourrlwater quality and
alleged trench location. Existing, on-site permanent monitoring wells and a network of 12
NOR/K:I WPl20064\133\Apr2002 -2nd semi-annual <pl.doc 1-2 RFW I JJ-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., c:,>rcssly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission or EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
temporary monitoring wells, located both on-site and off-site, were sampled to provide further
groundwater characterization.
The Phase II groundwater sampling program was designed primarily to evaluate the extent of
pesticide contamination. Samples for purgeable organic compound analyses were also collected
to obtain additional information on the extent of the chlorinated solvents. The pattern of
contamination and groundwater flow patterns developed during Phase I of the investigation
formed the basis for selection of the temporary monitoring well and permanent bedrock
monitoring well locations chosen by EPA for Phase II.
Most of the temporary monitoring wells were installed to provide additional data to be used to
evaluate the lateral extent of contaminants in the overburden portion of the aquifer. One of the
temporary wells, however, was installed to evaluate contamination previously identified m
permanent well MW-3 that was higher than detected in any of the other permanent wells.
In the saprolite, pesticides in groundwater arc restricted to the FCX property, with the exception
of one detection of lindane. Lindane is one of the most mobile pesticides, and would therefore be
expected to migrate farther than the other pesticides; however, the presence of lindane in the off-
site well is difficult to explain. If the estimated movement of lindane in the saprolite is projected
to be equal to the groundwater velocity, it would take over I 00 years for lindane to move through
the saprolite from the closest area of lind:me groundwater contamination on the site to the off-
site well. Also, the well is not directly downgradient of areas of pesticide contamination at the
site.
The modeled potential extent of pesticide contaminant plumes in the saprolite based on the
observed lindane indicated that migration ranged from only a few feet from the source area for
DDT and DOD to over I 00 feet from the source area for the most mobile pesticides.
Contaminant migration rates in the bedrock are projected to be faster than contaminant migration
rates in the saprolite. Only the more mobile pesticides (BHCs and endrin ketone) have been
NOR/K:\WN0064\l 33\Apr2002. 2nd semi-annual rpt.doc 1-3 RFWl33-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., e,prcssly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statcsville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
0-.itc: July 2002
found in samples from any bedrock wells, indicating that the vertical movement of the other, less
mobile pesticides through the saprolite has not yet been detected in the bedrock groundwater.
The results of soil transport modeling show that, potentially, the trichloroethene (TCE), PCE,
and related contaminants detected in groundwater beneath the site may have been leached from
soils along the northern side of the site at some time in the past. It is therefore possible that some
of the VOC contamination now detected in groundwater beneath the site is the result of past
leaching of VOC contaminated soils. The location of TCE and PCE contaminated soils beneath
mostly impervious areas suggests that present soil leaching of these contaminants from FCX is
likely to be insignificant.
VOCs have generally been found in soils in concentrations of less than 10 µg/kg and arc mostly
present in soil samples from less than 3 feet deep. Soil VOCs are primarily TCE and PCE.
Groundwater samples indicated contamination by VOCs in excess of the Federal Maximum
Contaminant Levels (MCLs) and the North Carolina Drinking Water Standards, both beneath the
site and in a plume extending downgradient of the site. The distribution of the chlorinated VOCs
in soils, groundwater, sediment, and surface water samples indicates that some of the VOC
contamination may have originated from an off-site source to the north of the FCX property.
Some groundwater samples also contain metals in excess of Federal or state 1,>roundwatcr or
drinking water quality standards. According to the Phase II RI (EPA, 1992) these metals
concentrations do not appear to be directly site-related.
As part of OU3, additional monitoring wells were installed in the vicinity of FCX, and select
wells were sampled in December 1995. Monitoring wells MW-Ss, MW-Sd, MW-11, W-22, W-
23, W-24, W-25, W-27, and W-29 were sampled for VOCs, SVOCs, metals, pesticides, and
PCBs.
It appears that in the saprolite, pesticides in the groundwater are restricted to the FCX property.
Lindane and alpha-BHC were detected in MW-11. Lindane and the BHC compounds are some
NOR/K:\Wl'\200641133\Apr2002 -2nd semi•annual rp1.doc 1-4 RFWIJJ-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., e~ressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Second Scmi•Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX•Statcsville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
of the more mobile pesticides and would therefore be expected to migrate farther than other
pesticides. Also, contaminant migration rates in the bedrock are projected to be faster than
contaminant migration rates in the saprolite.
ROD cleanup goals were exceeded for alpha and beta BHC and lindane in three wells. Alpha-
BHC and lindane concentrations exceeded cleanup goals in MW-5s and MW-5d (on-site
saprolite and bedrock wells, respectively) and MW-I I. Beta-BHC exceeded cleanup goals in
MW-5s and MW-5d.
Groundwater samples indicated that contamination by VOCs in excess of the MCLs and North
Carolina Drinking Water Standards, both beneath the site and downgradient of the site, exists.
VOCs exceeding MCLs were detected in both saprolite and bedrock wells with the highest
concentrations in bedrock wells.
1.3 LITHOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
The following information comes from the September 1993 Declaration for the Record of
Decision. The FCX site lies within the geologic belt known as the Blue Ridge-Inner Piedmont
Belt. The soils at the site are primarily silts or clays. The Blue Ridge-Inner Piedmont Belt
generally consists of metamorphic rocks including gneisses and schists, as well as gradations of
the two types. Most of these rocks near the surface have weathered into a layer of overburden
overlying the fractured, but relatively unweathered bedrock. The overburden ranges in thickness
from 15 to 40 feet at the site, and consists of saprolite and residual soils interspersed with
unweathered gneiss/schists. Granitic intrusions are also common in the area of the site. Soils in
the general area of the site belong to the Lloyd Association. These soils are characterized as
deep, well-drained soils with a subsoil of dark, red clay.
Groundwater at the site occurs in an unconfined to semi-confined aquifer consisting of the
overburden hydraulically interconnected with the underlying fractured bedrock. The saturated
overburden serves as a groundwater reservoir that supplies water to the fractures, faults, and
other secondary permeability features in the bedrock. The approximate depth to groundwater in
NOR/K:IWl'l20064\133\Apt2002 -211dsrmi-annualrpt.doc 1-5 RFWl33-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., qnessly for EPA. II shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
the saturated overburden in the vicinity of the site generally ranges from 27 to 30 feet below land
surface. During the wetter periods of the year, groundwater may intersect the ground surface and
become overland or surface water flow.
The following information comes from the January 1999 Remedial Action Report. FCX is
located in a hilltop topographic setting. Such hilltop topographic locations are characteristically
groundwater recharge zones. In groundwater recharge zones, groundwater flow usually has a
downward component and the migration of contaminants into deeper parts of an aquifer may be
enhanced in such areas. Water quality data suggest that this is the case at FCX.
The soil permeability, or hydraulic conductivity, controls the amount of groundwater recharge,
surface-water runoff and percolation, and rate of contaminant migration through the saturated
zone. At FCX, the calculated hydraulic conductivity in the saprolite is approximately 1.62 x I o·6
ft/sec, which is indicative of a relatively low permeability unit. This thickness of the unsaturated
zone should allow for substantial soil immobilization of many of the site-related contaminants.
Measurements made at the site indicate that the hydraulic conductivity of the saprolite
(weathered bedrock) is relatively low. The bedrock hydraulic conductivity is probably highly
variable, with limited zones of high or moderate permeability along rock fractures, separated by
substantial interfracture areas of extremely low or no permeability. The hydraulic conductivity
contrast between the bedrock and saprolite may also cause groundwater to flow downward from
the saprolite into the bedrock.
The hydraulic gradient appears to steepen toward the south and east. The variations m the
hydraulic gradient suggest that the site is near a groundwater divide.
The high soil clay content reduces the mobility of both orgamc compounds and inorganic
substances. In bedrock, fracture flow predominates, favoring increased contaminant mobility in
the bedrock (EPA Phase II RI, 1992).
NOR/K:\WPl2006411331Apr2002 -2nd semi-annual rpl.doc 1-6 RFW133-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., e;,pressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ii
I
1.4 LONG-TERM RESPONSE ACTION
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
The following information comes from the January 24, 2000 Statement of Work and the January
1999 Remedial Action Report. EPA tasked WESTON under ARCS Contract 68-W9-0057 to
install a ground water pump-and-treat system and to operate the system under work assignment
no. 78-4RA8M. That work assignment provided for the operation and maintenance (O&M) of the
LTRA from April 1998 through May 1999, at which time the work assignment was closed out
because the ARCS contract expired. No L TRA was performed from May 1999 to April 2000.
The Operable Unit I (OU!) ground water pump-and-treat system consists of ten (10) 4-inch
vertical recovery wells (RW-1 through RW-10) and pneumatic submersible pumps for ground
water extraction; four transfer pumps; a 300-gallon holding tank; a 1,200-gallon baffled holding
tank; two (2) sand filters; and two (2) granular-activated carbon (GAC) units for treatment. The
treatment system, powered by Duke Power, Inc., was transported to the site on April 25, 1998
and was installed by Envirosys, Inc. of Tampa, Florida on a level gravel pad that was prepared
for the system at the site for treatment.
Groundwater is extracted from the overburden materials beneath the FCX property using I 0
extraction wells and transported to an on-site treatment facility for treatment by filtration and
carbon adsorption. Treated groundwater is discharged to the local publicly owned treatment
works (POTW) under discharge permit T-43 issued by the City of Statesville (Appendix A).
The ten recovery wells (RW-1 through RW-10) were installed and developed for the extraction
system. Each of these wells was completed with four-inch outside diameter PVC casing and has
40 feet of 0.010-inch screen. Total depths ranged from 56.5 to 65 feet below ground surface.
Pneumatically operated pumps were installed in each well and all wells were then permanently
plumbed to the treatment system. Plumbing consisted of a ¾-inch diameter Schedule 80 PVC
airline and a 2-inch Schedule 40 PVC water influent line. The airline supplies pressure to operate
the pneumatic pumps while the influent line transports water pumped from the wells into the
treatment system. These lines run parallel and are buried from 1.5 to 2.5 feet below ground
NORIK:\WP\20064113J\Apr2002. 2nd semi-annual rptdoc 1-7 RFWl33-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., e:,::iressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesvillc Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
surface. In areas necessitating aboveground installation (between RW-4 and RW-5 and at the
treatment system entry), the water line was insulated with foam insulation.
From April 1998 through May 1999 various activities were implemented as part of the O&M of
the treatment system including: performing routine maintenance and repairs; weekly ground
water level measurements from the existing monitoring wells and recovery wells; recording
instrument readings; recording flow meter measurements from the recovery wells as well as
effluent discharge, collecting influent and effluent samples from the system for analysis, and
collecting ground water samples from the designated monitoring wells on a quarterly basis for
analysis. Currently, there are twelve permanent groundwater-monitoring wells on the FCX
property, as well as six wells further downgradient (Figure 2). Monitoring well W-22, located
within the warehouse, was within the area that has been excavated and backfilled as part of the
remedial action for OU2. During the remedial action, the well was destroyed.
The previous work assignment, 047-RARA-048M, set the framework and requirements for
WESTON to conduct the L TRA which included system start-up and diagnostic testing, O&M,
performance monitoring, and sampling and reporting at the FCX -Statesville site. The Record of
Decision (ROD) issued in September 1993, describes the RA selected for this site, and the RD
documents provide the construction and implementation detail required to achieve the selected RA.
The work assignment began April 2000; the completion date for the work assignment'was April 30,
2001.
The current work assignment provides for the continuing implementation of the LTRA.
NOR/K:\WP\200641133\Apr2002 -2ml semi.annual rpt doc 1-8 RFWI 33-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., e,pressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
. \ ,-.; ~ ..
)11?Y
,,1·•.
,i:·,
,' ',,1_ ./f:.:\:
i'.' ~::/.;:
;:.,:(,· ,;':.
~ ::•, : ;· _·~1' ~; ·,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION 2
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION
2.1 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE {O&M)
Applied Earth Sciences (AES) has been contracted by WESTON to perform O&M. O&M 1s
performed on a weekly basis while additional site visits for non-routine maintenance are
conducted on an "as needed" basis. In addition to performing maintenance to the system, the
subcontractor records the system operating parameters such as recovery well flow meter
readings, weekly discharge meter readings, pressure gauge readings, the time of the inspection
and/or readings, and measures the groundwater elevation in the recovery wells.
2.2 GROUNDWATER MONITORING
The subcontractor is required to perform semi-annual groundwater sampling. Groundwater from
twelve on-site and six off-site monitoring wells and the influent and effluent to the OU I pump
and treat system are sampled and analyzed for the contaminants of concern.
The purpose of the monitoring is to verify:
• that the pump and treat system is effective,
• that cleanup standards for groundwater are achieved throughout the L TRA; and
• that the system meets the effluent limits of the discharge permit.
The contaminants of concern and the corresponding remediation levels and discharge limits are
provided in Table I.
The subcontractor is also required to record the water level in each of the extraction wells each
week. The purpose for collecting groundwater elevations is to determine if the system is
providing adequate capture of the contaminant plume beneath the site.
NOR/K;\WP\20064\133\Apr2002 -2nd $erlli-arumal rpl doc 2-1 RFW 133-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., q-,ressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
The samples are collected in accordance with the following documents:
• Long Term Response Action Sampling And Analysis Plan, dated April 2000, and
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science and Ecosystem Support Division (EPA-
SESD), Region 4, revised Environmental Investigation Standard Operating Procedure
and Quality Assurance Manual (EISOPQAM), November 2001.
Laboratories in the Contract Laboratory Program analyze all samples with the exception of the
effluent sample. Prism Laboratories located in Charlotte, North Carolina analyzed the effluent
sample. Samples are analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), base/neutral acids
(BNAs), pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and total metals.
NOR/K:\WN0064\133\Apr2002 -2nd semi-annual rp!.doc 2-2 RFWl33-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., c,pressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part. without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION 3
LTRA SUMMARY
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statcsville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
3.1 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) SUMMARY
O&M activities were performed on a weekly basis from November 2001 through April 2002 and
are summarized below. Weekly O&M reports are included in Appendix B.
November 2001
• AES performed four weekly site visits for routine O&M.
• Minor repairs were performed including replacing a recovery well air pressure regulator
and leaky plumbing, and draining the secondary containment pond.
• On 28 November 200 I, AES mobilized to the site to address a high alarm condition. The
cause of the alarm was high water levels in the backwash tank and trickle filter sump due ,,,
to a cracked union to a check val've.
December 2001
• AES performed four weekly site visits for routine O&M.
• Minor repairs were performed, including replacing a cracked check valve and leaky
plumbing, changing the air compressor motor oil; and draining the secondary
containment pond.
January 2002
• AES performed five weekly site visits for routine O&M.
• On 25 January 2002, recovery well pumps I and 3 were discovered to be pumping very
little water. The pumps were pulled from the wells and disassembled to inspect for
damage. AES contacted a technical representative of the pump manufacturer, Clean
Environment Equipment, who stated that the pumps were in need of servicing due to the
age and usage of the pumps.
NOR/K:\V.W00641133\Apr2002 -2nd semi-annual rp1.doc 3-1 RFW I 33-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., e;,pressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
February 2002
• AES performed three weekly site visits for routine O&M.
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesvillc Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
• On 14 February 2002, the recovery well pump was removed from RW-3 and sent to the
manufacturer for servicing; the manufacturer provided a temporary replacement pump.
• Minor repairs were performed including replacing a faulty regulator at the recovery well
2 (RW-2).
March 2002
• AES performed five weekly site visits for routine O&M.
• On 12 March 2002, AES removed the pump from RW-1 and replaced it with the serviced
pump originally in RW-3. The pump will be sent to the manufacturer for servicing.
• Minor repairs were performed including replacing a faulty regulator at RW-1 and
changing the air compressor motor oil.
April 2002
• AES performed four weekly site visits for routine O&M.
• On April 15, 2002, AES removed the manufacturer's temporary replacement pump from
RW-3 and replaced it the serviced pump returned from the manufacturer. AES also
removed the pump from RW-6 and replaced it with the manufacturer's temporary
replacement pump. The pump from R W-6 was sent to the manufacturer for servicing.
• Minor repairs were performed including repairing, on April 2, 2002, a ruptured air feed
line coming from the compressor.
• On 23 April 2002, the air compressor motor was discovered to have malfunctioned and
ground faulted creating a failure in the compressor contactor in the control panel. An
Ingersoll-Rand technician assisted AES in diagnosis of the problem. AES ordered a
replacement motor.
NOR/K:\WN0064\133\Apr2002 -2nd semi-annual ipt.doc 3-2 RFW133-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., c~ressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
3.2 SECOND SEMI-ANNUAL SAMPLING EVENT -APRIL 2002
3.2.1 Groundwater Monitoring
WESTON and AES personnel mobilized to the site the week of 22 April 2002. AES personnel
proceeded to purge and sample the 18 monitoring well network.
Samples were collected on 23-24 April 2002. At least three well volumes were purged from each
monitoring well using a submersible pump or dedicated disposable bailer. Water quality
parameters (pH, specific conductance, temperature, and turbidity), water levels, and depth to
bottom of the well were recorded during purging (Appendix C). Groundwater samples were
collected using hailers, transferred into the appropriate containers, and preserved. Samples were
labeled, tagged, and sealed with chain of custody seals and transported via FedEx to the assigned
CLP laboratory (Appendix D). Organic samples were shipped to Ceimic Corporation or A4
Scientific and inorganic samples were shipped to Liberty Analytical Corp.
Monitoring wells MW-9, MW-10 and MW-23 were not sampled due to the lack of water.
Monitoring well MW-3 was not sampled due to damage to the riser, which obstructed and
prevented access to the groundwater with a bailer. MW-I, MW-2, and MW-4 were analyzed for
pesticides only. The remaining monitoring well samples were analyzed for VOCs, BNAs,
pesticides, PCBs, and total metals.
3.2.1.1 Monitoring well Sample Results
Groundwater samples collected from all of the monitoring wells, with the exception of MW-4,
contained levels of VOCs, pesticides, BNAs, and metals that exceeded the remediation levels.
The analytical results are summarized below:
NOR/K:IWP'l20064\ 133\Apr2002 -2nd semi-annual rp1.doc 3-3 RFWl33-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., e;,pressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
voes
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
I, 1-Dichloroethane (I, 1-DCA), chloroform, PCE, and TCE were detected at levels above the
remediation levels in groundwater sampled from monitoring wells MW-SD, W-24, W-2S, W-27
and W-29.
• 1,1-DCA was detected at S µg/L (estimated value) in W-29 and 6 µg/L (estimated value)
in MW-SD.
• Chloroform was detected at 0.42 µg/L (estimated value) in W-2S and I µg/L (estimated
value) in W-29.
• PCE was detected at concentrations ranging from 1.1 µg/L to~g/L in MW-SD, W-24,
W-27, and W-29.
• TCE was detected at S µg/L (estimated value) in MW-SD and 6 µg/L (estimated value) in
W-29 .
.,,,-----~-• Q,l:Qichloroethene ( 1,f:ocE), chloromethane, and bromodichloromethane were not .
detected in~ftherri"6°nitoring wellsa15ove tne remediation·Ievels.__ ___ _ _ _ fJ o f.?,1 b?
BNAs
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was detected at levels exceeding the remediation level in MW-SD,
MW-6D, W-24, and W-29.
• Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was detected in concentrations ranging from 7.3 µg/L t®
µg/L in MW-SD, MW-6D, W-24, and W-29.
Pesticides
Alpha-BHC, beta-BHC, gamma-BHC (lindane), dieldrin, gamma-chlordane, alpha chlordane,
and heptachlor epoxide were detected at levels exceeding the remediation levels in MW-I, MW-
2, MW-SD, MW-SS, MW-6S, MW-7, W-24, W-2S, and W-29.
NOR/K:\Wl'\20064\133\Ap,-2002 -2nd =i-annual rpt.doc 3-4 RFW133-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., c,pressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
•
•
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesvillc Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
Alpha-BHC was detected in concentrations ranging from 0.017 (presumptive evidence)
µg/L to9µg/L in MW-I, MW-2, MW-5D, MW-5S, MW-6S, and W-29.
~
Beta-BHC was detected in concentrations ranging from 0.060 µg/L toQ_jµg/L in MW-I,
MW-2, MW-5D, and MW-5S.
Dieldrin was detected at a concentration of0.32 (presumptive evidence) µg/L in MW-I.
Gamma-BHC (lindane) was detected in concentrations ranging from 0.038 µg/L 10'3
µg/L in MW-I, MW-5D, MW-5S, MW-7, and W-29.
• Heptachlor epoxide was detected in concentrations ranging from 0.045 (presumptive
evidence) µg/L to 13 µg/L in MW-I, MW-2, MW-6S, MW-7, W-25, and W-29.
• Gamma-chlordane and alpha chlordane were not detected in any monitoring wells.
Metals
Beryllium, chromium, manganese, and vanadium were detected in concentrations exceeding the
remediation levels in groundwater collected from all of the monitoring wells sampled with the
exception ofMW-5D and W-29.
• Beryllium was detected at a concentration of 6.5 µg/L in MW-I I.
• Chromium was detected in concentrations ranging from 68 (estimated value) µg/L to 170
µg/L in MW-5S, MW-I I, W-25, and W-27.
• Manganese was detected in concentrations ranging from 110 (estimated value) µg/L to
3,000 µg/L in all of the monitoring well with the exception ofMW-5D and W-29.
• Vanadium was detected at concentrations ranging from 110 (estimated value) µg/L to
210 (estimated value) µg/L in MW-11, W-25, and W-27.
The laboratory results are summarized in Table 2; complete laboratory results can be found in
Appendix E.
A result of the trend analyses from April 2000 to April 2002 for wells that have consistently
contained constituents of concern greater than the remediation levels indicates that levels or
NORIK:\Wf'J:0064\\33\Apr2002. 2nd semi-annual rp1.doc 3-5 RFW I 33-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., e~ressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Second Semi•Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX•Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
concentrations of the majority of pesticides in the groundwater, notably alpha-BHC, beta-BHC,
gamma-BHC (lindane), and heptachlor epoxide, tend to remain fairly stable or increase over time
in monitoring wells MW-I, MW-2, MW-5S, MW-5D, and W-29 and decrease in MW-5S and
MW-5D. A trend analyses from April 2000 to April 2002 indicates that the majority ofVOCs in
the groundwater tend to decrease over time in monitoring wells MW-5D, MW-6D, MW-9, MW-
! I, W-24, and W-29. The trend charts can be found in Appendix F.
WESTON has developed contaminant concentration contour maps for the VOCs, pesticides,
BNAs, and metals exceeding the remediation levels. The contour maps illustrate the horizontal
extent of groundwater contamination exceeding the remediation level for the shallow and deep
portions of the aquifer below the site (see Figures 3 through 14).
3.2.1.2 QA/QC Sample Results
The site-specific Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) requires quality assurance/quality control
(QA/QC) samples to be collected as part of each groundwater sampling event.
AES collected an equipment blank (EB-01), a field blank (FB-01), and a preservative blank (PB-
01) as required in the SAP. WESTON also submitted three trip blanks with the organic sample
shipments. Duplicate ·samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-6D and W-24, and W-
29.
Review of the duplicate analyses for monitoring well MW-6, W-24, and W-29 indicated
unacceptable relative percent difference for bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in MW-6 (33.52 per
cent). This result has been flagged accordingly.
3.2.2 Treatment System Monitoring
The treatment system monitoring performed from October 200 I through April 2002 1s
summarized below.
NOR/K:\WP\2006411331Ap12002 -2nd semi-annual rp1.doc 3-6 RFWl33-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., Cl)rcssly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.2.2.1 Water Level Elevations
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
Water level elevations were recorded at each monitoring well during sampling events and
weekly for each extraction well (Appendices B and C). The water level information is
summarized in Table 3 and visually represented in Appendix G. In addition to water level
measurements, flow meter discharge rates were recorded at each recovery well and at the system
effluent. The data was used to model the groundwater elevation during operation of the system.
By modeling the data, trends in changes in the groundwater elevations can be shown. During
periods of pumping, the capture plume of the recovery wells should overlap the area of the
plume indicating a hydraulic barrier to prevent further migration of contaminants off site.
In order to determine if the contaminant plumes are being captured by the current recovery
system, Weston utilized the groundwater model QuickFlow, Version 1.12. The following basic
assumptions apply to this situation of simulating pumping in an unconfined aquifer:
• The aquifer is unconfined.
• The vadose zone has no influence on the drawdown.
• Water initially pumped comes from the instantaneous release of water from elastic
storage.
• Eventually water comes from storage due to gravity drainage of interconnected pores and
fractures.
• The drawdown is negligible compared with the saturated aquifer thickness.
• The specific yield is at least IO times the elastic storage.
• All geological formations are horizontal and of infinite horizontal extent.
• The potentiometric surface of the aquifer is horizontal and is not changing with time prior
to the start of pumping.
• The changes in the position of the potentiometric surface are due to the effect of the
pumping wells alone.
• The aquifer is homogeneous and isotropic.
NORIK:IWP\20064\133\Ap,2002 -2nd semi-annual rpt.doc 3-7 RFWl33-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., e:,prcssly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written pL'TTilission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• All flow is radial toward the well.
• Groundwater flow is horizontal.
• Groundwater has a constant density and viscosity.
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Opernble Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
The hydrogeologic data was obtained from the Remedial Action Work Plan (OU I) prepared by
Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc. in December 1997. The potentiometric surface
elevations and pumping rates were obtained during field sampling activities conducted m
preparation for this Quarterly Monitoring Report. Table 4 shows all data used for the model.
Figure 15 shows the model results for the pumpmg time of 29 days during the month of
November. These results were calculated based on the average pumping rates from the flow
meter readings taken from November 01 -November 29, 2001. Figure 16 shows the model
results for the pumping time of 29 days during December (flow meter readings taken from
November 30-December 28, 2001). Figure 17 shows the model results for the pumping time of
31 days during the month of January (flow meter readings December 29, 2001 -January 29,
2002). Figure I 8 shows the model results for the pumping time of 23 days during the month of
February (flow meter readings January 30 -February 22, 2002). Figure 19 shows the model
results for the pumping time of 33 days during the month of March (flow meter readings
February 23 -March 25, 2002). Figure 20 shows the model results for the pumping time of 28
days during the month of April (flow meter readings March 26 -April 23, 2002). Figure 21
,, show the model results based on the average flow meter data for the entire reporting period
(November 200 I -April 2002) for the pumping time of 173 days. The model results indicate that
I
I
I
I
I
I
the recovery system is capturing the greater part of the plume. However, the southeastern portion
of the plumes, the area around monitoring wells W-25 and_W.=22, is not being caP.tured. This is ------,
likely due to location and depths of the recovery wells. The recover)'. wells are too remote from
the uncaptured p_grtion_oLthe_plume. AdditionallY., the recovery wells_ ~lso do not extend to an
adeql§te depth_to.capture-the-contaminatio11__.!!:!_at exists in the deep wells. The recovery system ---~ -·---::----c---------did not capture as large of an area_of th_e contaminant plume from February to April as was ------------captured earlier in the reporting period. This is attributed to poor performance of recovery wells
one, two, and three (RW-1, RW-2, RW-3). ------
NORIK:\WP\200641133\Apr2002. 2nd scmi-1111nual rpl.doc 3-8 RFWl33-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., c;,prcssly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written pennission of EPA.
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.2.2.2 Treatment System Results
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statcsville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
The purpose of collecting and analyzing the influent and effluent samples of the pump and treat
system is to ensure compliance with the City of Statesville Discharge Permit, T-43 issued on 14
April 2000 and revised on 19 April 2000 and 8 August 2000. The effluent limits and monitoring
requirements of the Permit are as follows:
• Less than the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) (or the minimum quantitation limit
(QL} if the MCL is less than the QL} for volatile hydrocarbons, and
• Less than I µg/1 for pesticides.
Metals, BN As, and PCBs are not covered under the discharge permit; therefore, the analytical
results for these analyses for the influent and effluent samples will not be discussed. No other
parameters arc required to be monitored.
Samples were collected from the influent and effluent sample ports of the pump and treat system
directly into the appropriate containers, and preserved. Samples were then labeled, tagged, and
sealed with chain of custody seals and transported via FedEx to the appropriate laboratory. The
influent sample was submitted to the CLP laboratories with the groundwater samples; the
effluent sample, EF-01, was submitted to Prism Laboratories, Inc. The influent sample, IN-01,
was analyzed for VOCs, BNAs, pesticides, PCBs, and total metals and the effluent sample was
analyzed for VOCs and pesticides.
Based on laboratory analytical results, the influent sample contained the following detectable
levels of VOC and pesticide constituents of concern.
• I, 1-DCA was detected at a concentration of 6.1 µg/L,
• 1,1-DCE was detected at a concentration of3.2 µg/L,
• Chloroform was detected at a concentration of 3.1 µg/L,
• PCE was detected at a concentration of 130 µg/L, and
• TCE was detected at a concentration of3.9 (estimated value) µg/L.
NOR/K:\WN00641133\Apr2002 -2nd =i-annual rpl.doc 3-9 RFW133-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., C,l)ressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
D
IJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statcsville Opt.-rable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
Other VOCs that were detected in the influent sample include 1,1,1-trichloroethane at a
concentration of 0.81 µg/L; I, l ,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane at a concentration of 22 µg/L,
carbon tetrachloride at a concentration of 0.37 (estimated value) µg/L, cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
(cis-1,2-DCE) at a concentration of 21 µg/L, and methyl ethyl ketone at a concentration of 5.0
(estimated value) µg/L.
• Alpha-BHC was detected at a concentration of0.26 µg/L,
• Beta-BHC was detected at a concentration of0.40 µg/L,
• Dieldrin was detected at a concentration of 0.034 µg/L,
• Gamma-BHC (lindane) was detected at a concentration of0.18 µg/L, and
• Heptachlor Epoxide was detected at a concentration of 1.4 µg/L.
Other pesticides that were detected include delta-BHC at a concentration of 0.083 µg/L and
endrin ketone at a concentration of 0.16 µg/L.
The laboratory analytical results for the effluent sample indicate that no pesticides were detected
above the laboratory-reporting limits. Three VOCs were detected in the effluent sample. I, 1-
DCA, acetone, and cis-1,2-DCE were detected at concentrations of 7.3 µg/L, 240 µg/L, and 16
µg/L, respectively. The North Carolina groundwater quality standards for 1,1 DCA, acetone, and
cis-1,2-DCE are 700 µg/L, 700 µg/L, and 70 µg/L, respectively. Consequently, the effluent from
the pump and treat system meets the discharge criteria set forth in Discharge Permit T-43.
The laboratory results are summarized in Table 5; complete laboratory reports can be found in
Appendix E.
3.2.2.3 POTW Discharge
After treatment, water is discharged to the City of Statesville sewer system under the conditions
of City Discharge Permit, T-43. The permit was issued pursuant to the requirements of the City
of Statesville Sewer Use Code. Permit conditions require that the discharge not exceed I 00 gpm.
The effluent limits for pesticides and volatile hydrocarbons are required to be less than I
NOR/K:I WN:00641133\Apr2002. 2nd se,ni-annual rpt.doc 3-10 RFWl33-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., e:,pressly for EPA. It shall nol he disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
microgram/liter (<l µg/1) and less than maximum contaminant level (MCL) (or the detection
limit if none exists), respectively. The MCL is equivalent to the North Carolina Groundwater
Quality Standards. Results are required to be submitted to the City of Statesville, Director of
Water Resources Department within 30 days of the sampling event for each quarter of the year.
AES recorded the discharge flow meters for each extraction well and the effluent meter on the
treatment system. The flow meter readings and calculations can be found in Tables 6 and 7.
Based on the effluent meter during the period of June 200 I through October 200 I; the total
quantity of water the remediation system treated and discharged to the city sewer totaled
369,115.9 cubic feet or 2,760,986.93 gallons.
Based on the laboratory analytical results for EFF-09260 I, the treatment system discharge was
within the specified limits of the monitored effluent parameters. No analytes were detected above
the discharge limits.
NOR/K:\WP\200M\133\AP"2002 -2nd semi-annual rp(.doc 3-11 RFWl33-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., Cl)TCSsly for EPA. II shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written pennission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION 4
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statcsville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
According to the laboratory results for FCX -OU I L TRA, a contaminant plume with VOC,
BNA, pesticide, and metals concentrations greater than the remediation levels exists beneath the
site and extends downgradient to the southeast towards monitoring well W-29. Review of the
influent sample analytical results indicates that the mass of contaminants is being reduced
through extraction by the pump and treat system.
The operation of the treatment system's recovery wells contributes to an effective hydraulic
barrier to inhibit the migration of the contaminant plume in the saprolite. The model results
indicate that the recovery system is capturing the greater part of the plume. The recovery system
did not capture as large an area of the contaminant plume from February to April as was captured
earlier in the reporting period. This is attributed to poor performance of recovery wells one, two,
and three, (R W-1, R W-2, RW-3), which have since been serviced by the manufacturer.
Review of the effluent results indicates that the remediation system is effectively treating the
groundwater prior to being discharged to the city sewer.
Based upon the findings of the April 2002 sampling event, WESTON recommends continuing
O&M and monitoring activities at FCX.
NOR/K:\Wf'\20064\133\Apr2002 -2nd semi-annual rpt.doc 4-1 RFW 133-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Weston Solutions, Inc., Cl)ressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part. without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION 5
REFERENCES
Second Semi-Annual Sampling Event Report
FCX-Statesville Operable Unit I
Revision: 0
Date: July 2002
Freeze, R. Allen and Cherry, John A. Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.,
1979
Roy F. Weston, Inc.: Remedial Action Report, FCX Statesville Operable Unit One, Groundwater
Remediation, Statesville, North Carolina. Norcross, Georgia: McKeen, 1999
U.S. EPA: Declaration for the Record of Decision. Atlanta, Georgia: 1993.
U.S. EPA: Statement of Work for Long-Term Response Action. Atlanta, Georgia: January 2001.
NOR/K:IWP\200641!33\Apr2002 -2nd semi-annual <pl.doc 5-1 RFWl33-2A-ALIJ
This document was prepared by Wcslon Solutions, Inc., e:,pressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express
written permission of EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I FIGURES
I
1~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I NOR/K:\WP\20064\t33\Apr2002-2nd semi-annual rpt.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FIGURE l
SITE LOCATION MAP
LONG TERM RESPONSE ACTION
FCX -OUl
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
Deep Wells
Depth to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC}
MW-5O 124
MW-6O 150
MW-11 77
W-29 98
Shallow Wells
Depth to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC}
MW-1 47
MW-2 51
MW-3 50
MW-4 54
MW-5S 39
MW-6S 54
MW-7 52
MW-8 57
MW-9 45
MW-10 47
W-23 23
W-24 20
W-25 24
W-27 40
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
LEGEND
A RW-1 Recovery Well
~-MW-1 Monitoring Well
~ W-23 Monitoring Well
□
D
Scale
(feet)
0 100 200
0
W-23
FCX • OU1
0 MW-11
0
W-24
W-29
0
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
------/
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE MAP
FIGURE 2
0
W-25
DKS
DAJ'E DES. ENG. i 06/20/02
OATE Al'PllCMD ' I
DAJE W.O.NO.
20064-133-100
DWG. NO.
0001.CDR
I
Shallow Wells
I De12th to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC)
I MW-1 47
MW-2 51
MW-3 50 I MW-4 54
MW-5S 39
I MW-6S 54
MW-7 52
I MW-8 57
MW-9 45
I MW-10 47
W-23 23
W-24 20 I W-25 24
W-27 40
I
I
I
I
I
;
I LEGEND
.A. RW-1 Recovery Well
I 0-MW-1 Monitoring Well (OU1)
· 912.65 Water Elevation (ft above msl)
· W-23 Monitoring Well (OU3) I -0 916.60 Water Elevation (ft above msl)
•. 924.0··· Water Elevation lsocontour
I --+ Groundwater Flow Direction
NA Not Applicable (Deep wells)
I
Scale
(feet)
□
D
--~c::: ~-------,
0 100 200
Notes:
(1) Water levels measured
April 23, 2002.
V
D
(2) NA= Not Applicable (Deep Wells)
(3) Groundwater fiow patterns
are inconsistent due to effects
of pumping.
MW-11
00 NA
W-24
911.37
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
--------1 I
FCX-OU1
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
SHALLOW AQUIFER POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP
DRA'M<
FIGURE 3
0
W-25
911.91
DKS
D
DATE DES. ENG.
06/20/02
DATE APl'RO>'EO
DATE W.0.NO.
20064-133-100
fNIG.NO.
0002.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
Well
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
ns
nd
A RW-1
0 MW-1
· 0.01
Degth to Bottom Degth to Bottom
(ft. BTOC) Well (ft. BTOC)
47 MW-5D 124
51 MW-6D 150
50 MW-11 77
54 W-29 98
39 BTOC = Below Top of Casing
54
52
57
45
47
23
20
24
40
Scale
(feet) C: ]~~~]
0 100 200
LEGEND
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Alpha-BHC Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
~ W-23 Monitoring Well (OU3)
I · 0.01 Alpha-BHC Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
N Presumptive Evidence of presence of material
I t;;BJ.~lf;, ~b~~=dR:~:~'.a~io~'~:~r~~-~fn~;~inant (Shallow)
D
□
D
/
M
0
~~ BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES nd ~
~,., ri FCX
M~SS MW'W
~7
d
I
nd
D
'--L.l.--~ CITY STORM SEWER ns
FCX -OU1
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ALPHA-BHC CONCENTRATION MAP
---------7 f
DRAWN
0
W-25
nd
DATE DES. ENG. DATE W. O. NO.
Inferred Extent of Alpha-BHC Contaminant (Deep) DKS i 06/25/02 20064-133-IOO
IL ______ A_b_o_v_e_R_e_m_e_d_ia-tio_n_G_o_a1_o_f_o_.0_1_u_g_1L ______ _,_ _____ _,_ ____________ F_I_G_U_R_E_4 ____________ ...J_= ______ ...J_DATE ___ .1.Al'PflCNE ___ o ____ LoAJE ___ _,_DWG_::.:·NO:=.=c:._-1 0010.CDR
I .--------.-------,----------.~----------------,
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
Well
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
ns
nd
,A. RW-1
0-MW-1
· 0.01
~-W-23
· 0.01
Degth to Bottom Degth to Bottom
(ft. BTOC) Well (ft. BTOC)
47 MW-5D 124
51 MW-6D 150
50 MW-11 77
54 W-29 98
39 BTOC = Below Top of Casing
54
52
57
45
47
23
20
24
40
0
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
200
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well {OU1)
Beta-BHC Contaminant Concentration {ug/L)
Monitoring Well {OU3)
Beta-BHC Contaminant Concentration {ug/L)
Inferred Extent of Beta-BHC Contaminant {Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 0.01 ug/L
D
□
D
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
MW-8 ' _/ ~ ld FCX ~' ;-
Rw10...
D ~ yRWS :CM"',;d61]
W-27 -j/J • R~9 0 / V ./ R~6RW7• RW8 / "11!
V "'~<> ~-//ff •t? I/
0
W-23
ns
0/) 0 V ~ ~J-!-+---~~CITY STORM SEWER
o(;j
FCX -OU1
MW-11
W-29
nd 0
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
BETA-BHC CONCENTRATION MAP
--------------1 I
ORAv.!<
0
W-25
nd
OAJ'E DES. ENG. DATE W. 0. NO.
Inferred Extent of Beta-BHCContaminant {Deep) DKS ; 06/25/02 20064-I33-IOO II Above Remediation Goal of 0.01 ug/L FIGURE 5 O£O<ID DATE APPRCMD AJE CING. NO.
II ~-----------------------~-----~----------------------------'--------'-'-----'-------'-----'---'-OOCCIC-'L-=-CD::..CR"---'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
Well
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
ns
nd
.A. RW-1
-0-MW-1
0.01
-0 W-23
· 0.01
J
Degth to Bottom Degth to Bottom
(ft. BTOC) Well (ft. BTOC)
47 MW-5D 124
51 MW-6D 150
50 MW-11 77
54 W-29 98
39 BTOC = Below Top of Casing
54
52
57
45
47
23
20
24
40
0
.
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
200
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Gamma-BHC Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Gamma-BHC Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Estimated Value
Inferred Extent of Gamma-BHC Contaminant (Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 0.027 ug/L
D
□
D ~----1+---1-----,,--'-r--TREATMENT SYSTEM
0 ~-1-1----CITY STORM SEWER ns
FCX -OU1
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
GAMMA-BHC CONCENTRATION MAP
ORA"" CATE DES. ENG. DATI: W. O. NO.
Inferred Extent of Gamma-BHC Contaminant (Deep) DKS 06/27/02 20064-133-100 II Above Remediation Goal of 0.027 ug/L FIGURE 6 OEaaD MJE APPRCMo ONG. NO.
IJ ~-----------------------~-----~---------------------------~-------'-----'-------'-----.._-'-00:..:.1.::.2·.::.CD::.cR:.:.......J
1.-----.---------.-----~--------------
/
0~--~
I MWnd-4 . ¾~-BURLINGTON t 1/ ~, INDUSTRIES
. . ~,
I -'
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
Degth to Bottom Degth to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC) Well (fl. BTOC)
MW-1 47 MW-5D 124
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
ns
nd
• RW-1
I 0 MW-1
· 0.01
I
I
0 W-23
· 0.01
N
51 MW-6D 150
50 MW-11 77
54 W-29 98
39 BTOC = Below Top of Casing
54
52
57
45
47
23
20 □ 24
40
D
Scale
(feet) c-~~~,
0 100 200
LEGEND
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Heptachlor Epoxide Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Heptachlor Epoxide Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Presumptive evidence of presence of materia_l
Inferred Extent of Heptachlor Epoxide Contaminant (Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 0.038 ug/L
FCX
D
Cl [)~a,,.,-
'-...__"' , RW1.. 1 W-1 ;.-· · . -·-.....
·"'~ -RW ,
/) M~s 0 \ 0 . -: ·04; .:-.. ~-:~:,~ \ loss ~ W-27 ~~ ~.t~ ·,c. · · · ... · 0 · I /'"\0 ~~-~~ 4,-· Rfa5~~r~ Rwi• Rt~ >~-"'{9M -d-c;P ,F V "ii'" _---.-RW6 . -·. · jf W ""~"b..,<t~---,• _---..__-,c : -'"~ ~ -,-~-~ ~~~ ~-ml Q '\ ;-;~;f' _/"~//'U ~ J
\~\'•?;t/_x:-,.,, .. ~~ .rJ4
\~i{f.!i_:\, ... · , ( ;" . T TREATMENT SYSTEM
-c-~1-7'~cc;:1"-CITY STORM SEWER -~::~I~~-: ns
W-23
{)
.........
C:J
FCX -OU1
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
HEPATCHLOR EPOXIDE CONCENTRATION MAP
OAA'M-1 DATE DES. ENG. DATE W. O. NO.
Inferred Extent of Heptachlor Epoxide Contaminant (Deep) DKS 06127/02 20064-133-100 l!!I Above Remediation Goal of 0.038 ug/L FIGURE 7 CHECl<ID DA1E APPRCMO ONG. NO. IJ ._ __________________________ _._ ____ _._ ____________________________ _._ ______ ___Jc__ ___ L--. ______ _,_ ___ _,__.::.:00:.:1.::.:3.::::C::::D.::.:R__J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
Well
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
ns
nd
A RW-1
0 MW-1
0.01
0 W-23
· 0.01
J
Der1th to Bottom Der1th to Bottom
/ft. BTOC} Well /ft. BTOC}
47 MW-5D 124
51 MW-6D 150
50 MW-11 77
54 W-29 98
39 BTOC = Below Top of Casing
54
52
57
45
47
23
20
24
40
0
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
200
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
1, 1-Dichloroethane Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
1, 1-Dichloroethane Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Estimated Value
Inferred Extent of 1, 1-Dichloroethane Contaminant (Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 1 ug/L
D
□
D
ns
R~S 4 RW74
RW6
()
MW-11
------1 I
FCX -OU1
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE (1,1-DCA) CONCENTRATION MAP
OAAY,N
0
W-25
nd
DATE DES. ENG. DATE W. 0. NO.
Inferred Extent of 1,1-Dichlorethane Contaminant (Deep) DKS 06/28/02 20064-133-IOO
I Above Remediation Goal of 1 ug/L FIGURE 8 O<ECl<ID <WE APPRCMO ATE DWG. NO.
L----------------------,-------'------'------------------------------'---------'L----L--------'-----'---"OO:.:l_:.c4·..::C=.D:..cR__,
1.-----~---~---~---------------,
/ M • < """Gm, T I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
Well
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
ns
nd
A RW-1
-0 MW-1
· 0.01
0 W-23
· 0.01
J
Der;1th to Bottom Der;1th to Bottom
(ft. BTOC) Well (ft. BTOC)
47 MW-5D 124
51 MW-6D 150
50 MW-11 77
54 W-29 98
39 BTOC = Below Top of Casing
54
52
57
45
47
23
20
24
40
0
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
Well was dry, not sampled
200
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Chloroform Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Chloroform Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Estimated Value
Inferred Extent of Chloroform Contaminant (Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 0.19 ug/L
D
□
D
ns INDUSTRIES £
0
W-23
ns
FCX -OU1
()
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CHLOROFORM CONCENTRATION MAP DRA..,.
----
• ·: 042J ;·"' '~-~-jr-~;;;,,
DAYE DES. ENG. DAJE W. 0. NO.
Inferred Extent of Chloroform Contaminant (Deep) DKS : 06/28/02 20064-133-IOO
■ Above Remediation Goal of 0.19 ug/L FIGURE 9 CHEC1<ID DATE APPRCMO AJc DWG. NO.
i) ~-------------------------~---~-----------------------------'--------L'-----'--------L----L--'-'00:.:.1:..:5 . .::CD.::R:.:.__,
1~-----~--------r---------~..,,....,,.-----------------------------,
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
~ I Depth to Bottom Depth to Bottom
BURLINGTON ! Well (ft. BTOC) Well (ft. BTOC)
INDUSTRIES 1J MW-5D 124 ~ II MW-6D 150 ~-8 ~~
MW-1 47
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24_
W-25
W-27
ns
nd
A RW-1
0 MW-1
· 0.01
0 W-23
· 0.01
51
50 MW-11 77 FCX r 54
39
54
52
57
45
47
23
20 -
24
40
0
--
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
W-29 98
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
200
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Tetrachloroethene Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Tetrachloroethene Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
MW-9
ns
D .. --□--. ---RW7A
I,,.
RWG--
D ~--i'-+-----CITY STORM SEWER
0
W-25 ~ ~
nd ~
C::J
---------/ f
FCX -OU1 STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
-----_, __ _
I :'~:i°f,I;:;, Inferred Extent of Tetrachloroethene Contaminant (Shallow) ·----Above Remediation Goal of 0. 7 ug/L
DA1E DES. ENG. DAJE W. 0. NO.
TERTACHLOROETHENE (PCE) CONCENTRATION MAP
WN Inferred Extent of Tetrachloroethene Contaminant (Deep)
DKS 06/28/02 20064-133-100 ml L ______ A_b_o_v_e_R_e_m_e_d_ia_t_io_n_G_o_a_1_o_f_0._7_u_g_1L _________ .,__ ___ ~ _____________ F_IG_U_R_E_1_0 ____________ _._= ______ --''--CWE------'-APPRCM---o-----'-------'-DWG---NO--__ _,
1J
0016.CDR
1.-----------r--------.------~----------------,
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
il
I
I
Sha!!ow V'/ells
Well
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
De1,1th to Bottom
(ft. BTOC)
47
51
50
54
39
54
52
57
45
47
23
20
24
40
Scale
(feet)
Deep Wells
De1,1th to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC)
MW-5D 124
MW-6D 150
MW-11 77
W-29 98
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
~
0 100 200
□
D
f----------------------------,
ns
nd
• RW-1
0 MW-1
· 0.01
~ W-23
O.D1
J
LEGEND
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Trichloroethene Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Trichloroethene Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Estimated Value
Inferred Extent of Trichloroethene Contaminant (Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 2.8 ug/L
D
MW-8
d FCX
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
~ I
~-~
I
MW-9 ---.,___J ns ',
ns
FCX -OU1
RW7A
,t,.
RW6
,t,.
RW8
oo◊
oC)
MW-11
-------1 f
STATESVILLE, I REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
TRICHLOROETHENE (TCE) CONCENTRATION MAP
0
W-25
nd
DATE DES. ENG. OAJE W. 0. NO.
Inferred Extent of Trichloroethene Contaminant (Deep) DKS 06/28/02 20064-133-J00
I Above Remediation Goal of 2.8 ug/L FIGURE 11 CHECl<Rl CWE APPRo,ED ATE r:mG. NO.
~----------------------,-------'------'-----------------------------'--------'----..__ _____ __J ___ __Jc___0:.:0..:_!7c:..C=.:D:..:R..:___J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells
Well
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
Degth to Bottom
(ft. BTOC)
47
51
50
54
39
54
52
57
45
47
23
20
24
40
Scale
(feet)
Deep Wells
Degth to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC)
MW-5D 124
MW-6D 150
MW-11 77
W-29 98
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
□
D
11--_____ 0 ____ 1_0_0 ___ 2_0_0 _________ -,
I
I
I
I
ns
nd
.... RW-1
~-MW-1
0.01
0-W-23
· 0.01
J
LEGEND
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Chromium Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Chromium Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Estimated Value
I :J;f.},ir~:• ~b~~=~;~:~:a~~o~h~~~/~7 5~o~~~tinant (Shallow)
D
0
W-23
ns
FCX -OU1
W-24
nd
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CHROMIUM CONCENTRATION MAP
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES I
'-----1+-1--+,.,_TREATMENTSYSTEM
0
------------1 f
WN DATE DES. ENG. DATE W. O. NO.
Inferred Extent of Chromium Contaminant (Deep) DKS 06/28/02 20064-133-100
I L ______ A_b_o_ve_R_e_m_e_d_ia_u_o_n_G_o_a_1 _of_5_o_ug_1_L ___ ~-----'-------'--------------F-IG_u_R_E_1_2 ____________ __,_= ______ _____,_= ___ __,_Al'PllCMD ______ _,_DATE ____ ._DWG __ • NO:._ • ..,;_:.___J 0018.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells
Well
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
De12th to Bottom
(ft. BTOC)
47
51
50
54
39
54
52
57
45
47
23
20
24
40
Scale
(feet)
Deep Wells
De12th to Bottom
Well (ft. BTOC)
MW-5D 124
MW-6D 150
MW-11 77
W-29 98
BTOC = Below Top of Casing
D
□
D
0
M -4
ns
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
I I I
I I
I I I I
I I
I I I
I I
"-"-'+!"¥"'-'-,""-c-l-: TREATMENT SYSTEM
I
I J]~f "y STORM s,w,R
I
11--_____ 0 ____ 1_0_0 ___ 2_0_0 _______ ~
I
I
I
I
ns
nd
... RW-1
0· MW-1
· 0.01
0 W-23
. O.D1
J
LEGEND
Well was dry. not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Manganese Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Manganese Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Estimated Value
Inferred Extent of Manganese Contaminant (Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 50 ug/L
FCX -OU1
W-29
nd 0
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
MANGANESE CONCENTRATION MAP
--------1 I
C»AWN OAJE DES. ENG. DATE W. 0. NO.
Inferred Extent of Manganese Contaminant (Deep) DKS 06/28102 20064-133-IOO
I Above Remediation Goal of 50 ug/L FIGURE 13 CHECl<H) MTE Al'l'RO>'ED DATE CING. NO.
L._ ______________________ ....;__ ___ ...,_ ______ ,__ ______________________________ .,__ ______ _Jl-___ ..L ______ _J ____ _i__.:.00::..:1.:.9:.::.C:::D:.:.R:_...J
I~------~-----------------~
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Shallow Wells Deep Wells
Well
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-5S
MW-6S
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9
MW-10
W-23
W-24
W-25
W-27
ns
nd
A RW-1
~ MW-1
0.01
~ W-23
0.01
J
Degth to Bottom Degth to Bottom
/ft. BTOC) Well /ft. BTOC)
47 MW-5D 124
51 MW-6D 150
50 MW-11 77
54 W-29 98
39 BTOC = Below Top of Casing
54
52
57
45
47
23
20
24
40
0
Scale
(feet)
100
LEGEND
200
Well was dry, not sampled
Contaminant not detected above the remediation goal
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Vanadium Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Vanadium Contaminant Concentration (ug/L)
Estimated Value
Inferred Extent of Vanadium Contaminant (Shallow)
Above Remediation Goal of 98 ug/L
Inferred Extent of Vanadium Contaminant (Deep)
Above Remediation Goal of 98 ug/L
D
□
D
~-1
0Cfi ,---...... .
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
: .. ,:,. · ~-. 0M~ .a. j ns
Jt;0W-27,;••,..•~~ W4R~5 RW7A ~.\s :\'."·~~~ ~
~-. ,.-._;,:.:.:,-. ;~◊~ ~
0
W-23
ns
FCX -OU1
w
n
W-29
nd 0
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
VANADIUM CONCENTRATION MAP
FIGURE 14
D '-+----CITY STORM SEWER
cs
------1 f
DRAWN DATE DES. ENG. DKS 06/28/02
DATE APPRCMD
DATE w.o.NO.
20064-133-100
r:tNG.NO.
0020.CDR
l~------------c----------------------------i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•1-----
1
I
I
I
I
.A. RW-1
~ MW-1
~ W-23
-----, .
... --......
-71.0 -
LEGEND
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Inferred extent of total
contamination in deep
and shallow wells
Water Level lsocontour
Direction of Groundwater
Flow
D
□
D
Scale
(feet) -= 0 100 200
•
~
\'-. ..
-0 N 0
0
• • • •
,I'
W-24
MW-11
/ -------
FCX -OU1
O' '
W-25 / ,I' ~
o-,____,_____·
, ,
, ,
STATESVILLE. IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
QuickFlow © Model Results
Based on November 2001 Flow Meter Data
FIGURE 15
®
ORA..,,. DAJ'E DES. ENG.
OKS 06/24/02
CW'E APPllOJ'EO
OAJE W.O.NO.
20064-133-100
r:mG. NO.
0003.CDR
1------------,-------------------------i
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I • '---------~
I
I
I
I
-"' RW-1
·~ MW-1
~· W-23
-... -,
-71.0 -
LEGEND
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Inferred extent of total
contamination in deep
and shallow wells
Water Level lsocontour
D
□
D
0
o
Scale
(feet)
100
.c, _,
.c,
0
200
\ \ \
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
919.0
' .,
-6S•
' '
D ' I
~ J '
•
.o,,
~o~"
W-24
FCX -OU1
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
QuickFlow © Model Results
Based on December 2001 Flow Meter Data
®
~
DATE DES. ENG. DA1E
Direction of Groundwater FIGURE 16 OiECkB'.l DA1E APPRCMO DAJE ~-NO. I L _____ _.'.:F.'.'.lo~w:._ ______ _l ________________ _l _____________________________ L_ ______ ..1_ ___ _,_ ______ _,_ ___ --''--0_004_.c_o_R _ __,
DKS 06/24/02
w.o.NO.
20064-133-100
1-------------,-----------------------~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11-----------,
I
I
I
I
.A. RW-1
-0-MW-1
-0-W-23
---... , -... ---...
-71.0 -
LEGEND
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Inferred extent of total
contamination in deep
and shallow wells
Water Level lsocontour
D
□
D
/
-0
"' ~
0
Scale
(feet)
-0 ...,
-0
0
\
~
0 100 200
' ' ' ' ' .,
\ ',
\, \•
' ' ' '
w-p
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
919.0
FCX -OU1
' ◊ '
W-25/~
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
QuickFlow © Model Results
Based on January 2002 Flow Meter Data
----------------
®
ClRA'Mj DATE DES. ENG.
DKS 06/24/02
DATE w.o.NO.
20064-133-100
Direction of Groundwater FIGURE 17 O<EC1<1D DAlE APPRCMD CING. NO. I L _____ F'.:.'l~ow~ ______ _l__ _______________ ....1.. ___________________________ ..L_ ______ ..L_ ___ _.l_ ______ L_ ___ L_o_o_os_.c_o_R _ __,
1--------------,-----:------------------------i
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11------------,
LEGEND
I
I
I
A RW-1
-0 MW-1
-0· W-23
----, -............
-71.0 -
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Inferred extent of total
contamination in deep
and shallow wells
Water Level lsocontour
□
D
D
Scale
(feet)
_.MW
... .. .. -
0
~
0 100 200
'
'
' '
..
W-23
-0 _,
-0
0
_.._..MW-11
W-24
W-2s.
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
FCX -OU1
, , ,
' 0 '
O' '
' ' ,
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
QuickFlow © Model Results
Based on February 2002 Flow Meter Data
I
®
ORA\\N DATE DES. ENG. Ol'JE
DKS 06/24/02
Direction of Groundwater FIGURE 18 CHEO<EO Ol'JE Al'l'llO,EO Ale ONG. NO. I L _____ ~Fl~o~w~ ______ L _____ _:_ _________ L __________________________ _J ______ -1 ___ -1 ______ --'------'--0_0_06_.c_o_R _ __,
W.O. NO.
20064-133-100
I
lffi
I j I
I
I
I
I
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
E .... RW-1
I ~MW-1
~-W-23
I .. ---, ' .. -.......
I -71.0 -
I
□
D
LEGEND
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Inferred extent of total
contamination in deep
and shallow wells
Water Level lsocontour
0
Direction of Groundwater
Flow
/
D
Scale
(feet)
'100
i8 !" 0
• ' --+----a---t---a,\ '
200
W-23
BURt!NG~T~O~N~-,--------ll_f----------lNDUST:ES
><-~~
' ' '
~
W-24
W-2~
' ' ' ·;-~
FCX -OU1
, , --
,
D'
~
W-25 '
'
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
QuickFlow © Model Results
Based on March 2002 Flow Meter Data
FIGURE 19
OOAv.,<
DKS
CHEa<ED
®
OAJE DES. ENG.
06124/02
DA1E APPRO'IEO
DATE
DATE
W.O.NO.
20064-133-100
ONG.NO.
0007.CDR
I
lW
I i I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,A. RW-1
I ·~ MW-1
~ W-23
I .. ---... , -............
I -71.0 -
I
LEGEND
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Inferred extent of total
contamination in deep
and shallow weUs
Water Level lsocontour
Direction of Groundwater
Flow
□
D
0
V
D
Scale
(feet)
100
• -~-1-c-••-+--~\--\-°"'1
-0
"'
0
200
•
• •
-0 _,
-0 . . ,o
• ' '
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES~------7
'1 I '
' 0
()
MW-11
~~
W-24
•
FCX -OU1
I
I
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
QuickFlow © Model Results
Based on April 2002 Flow Meter Data
FIGURE 20
®
DRAWN DAYE DES. ENG.
DKS 06/25/02
CHECl<H)
OAJE
A1E
W.O.NO.
20064-133-100
ONG.NO.
0008.CDR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1--------.
I
I
I
I
I
A RW-1
0· MW-1
0 W-23
, -.... -... ....... -...
-71.0 -
LEGEND
Recovery Well
Monitoring Well (OU1)
Monitoring Well (OU3)
Inferred extent of total
contamination in deep
and shallow wells
Water Level lsocontour
Direction of Groundwater
Flow
D
□
0
200
. \
• -CJ . _,
• -CJ ,o
• • ' '
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIE,;:,Sc---
{)
MW-11
~~
W-24
FCX -OU1
--
' ◊ '
,
--
STATESVILLE, !REDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
QuickFlow © Model Results
Based on Average Flow Meter Data from November 2001 to April 2002
FIGURE 21
®
OAAWN DATE DES. ENG.
DKS 06/25/02
DATE APP1lO,IEI)
DATE W.O.NO.
20064-133-100
OYIG.NO.
0009.CDR
··:•·
I
I
I
I
I
I ,,
I
I
I
I ,,
,,
I
I
' I
I
I· NOR/K:\WP\20064\133\Apr2002-2nd seml-imnual rpt.doc
TABLES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table I
Groundwater Remediation Lelvels
FCX -Statesville OUI
Remediation Constituent Level (ug/L)
I, 1-Dichloroethane I
I, 1-Dichloroethene 7
Bromodich]oromethane 100
Chloroform 0.19
Chloromethane I
Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 0.7
Trichloroethene 2.8
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate 6
Aloha-Bl-IC 0.01
Aloha-chlordane 0.027
Beta-Bl-IC 0.01
Dieldrin 0.1
Gamma-Bl-IC (Lindanc) 0.027
Gamma-chlordane 0.027
1-leptachlor Epoxide 0.038
Bcrvllium 4
Chromium 50
Manganese 50
Vanadium 98
Notes: --No discharge limit required by pennit.
Discharge
Limit
Inv/I.\
700
7
10
0.19
I
0.7
2.8
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
--
--
--
The remediation levels are defined in the Final ROD dated
September 27, 1993; the discharge limits are set forth in the
City of Statesville Discharge Permit No. T-43.
k:lwp\20064\133\Apr2002-tbls.xls Table 1 -GW RGs
-illil , .... -. Table 2
Groundwater Wells Analytical Data
FCX-Statesville OUI
April 2002
--
CAS Number Compound
Remediation Station ID 1----~----,----=~-r---~=~..C..C-"',-'CC,----==-.--=~-,-,~~=-----r--=----i Level MW-I MW-2 MW-4 MW-SD MW-5S MW-6D MW-6D (Dup MW-6S MW-7
VOCs (ug/L)
75-34-3 I, 1-Dichloroethane
75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene
75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane
67-66-3 Chloroform
74-87-3 Chloromethane
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
79-01-6 Trichloroethene
BNAs (ug/L)
117-81-7 Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
319-84-6
5103-71-9
3 I 9-85-7
60-57-1
58-89-9
12789-03-6
1024-57-3
7440-41-7
7440-47-3
7439-96-5
7440-62-2
Pesticides & PCBs (ug/L)
Alpha-BHC
Alpha-chlordane
Beta-BHC
Dieldrin
Gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Gamma-chlordane
Heptachlor Epoxide
lnorganics -Total (ug/L)
Beryllium
Chromium
Manganese
Vanadium
(u L)
I
7
100
0.19
0.7
2.8
6
0.01
0.027
0.01
0.1
0.027
0.027
0.038
4
50
50
98
0.010 U
~otowt,Nif.jl
0.010 U
Wo7o6oAAII/~
0.031 N
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.020 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
Note: U = Compound analyzed for but not detected; value is the minimum quantitation limit.
J -Estimated Value
N = Presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Shaded results exceed remediation level.
The remediation levels are defined in the Final ROD dated September 27, 1993.
k:\wp\20064\133\Apr2002-tbls.xls Table 2 · GW MW Data Page I of2
N6:f1iffi
5 J
10 U
IOU
IOU
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.40 J
0.50 U
@"/r,!J\ore,:i l;,•$,t3(4\il§\11',i
0.010 U 0.010 U
ij#o!r5/l:i§i@! ~tf J!o~:\ll/il
0.020 U 0.020 U
!l~JH2)%:'l'I ll,1Pf4\IW,!(J
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.50 U
0.58
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.28 J
0.50 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.020 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.31 U
0.93 R
44 J
0.50 UJ
1.5 U 0.30 U
~~-0.64R ;0-0,L ltt'.40fJjlj
65 J 0.56 R
0.50 U
0.65
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.37 J
0.50 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.020 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.26 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0:02~" "7 "
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.020 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
5.0 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.010 U
0.020 U
-
111111 -.. -.. -iiijii) -liiiijJ liiiJ -4iillJ ---lliill
Table 2
Groundwater Wells Analytical Data
FCX-Statesville OU!
April 2002
Remediation
CAS Number Compound Level MW-8 MW-11 W-24
(u L)
voes (ug/L)
75-34-3 U-Dichloroethane I 0.50 V 0.50 V 0.50 V
75-35-4 I, 1-Dichloroethene 7 0.50 V 0.50 V 0.50 V
75-27-4 Brornodichloromethane 100 0.50 V 0.50 V 0.50 V
67-66-3 Chloroform 0.19 0.50 V 0.50 V 0.50 V
74-87-3 Chloromethane I 0.50 V 0.50 V 0.50 V
127-18-4 T etrachloroethene (PCE) 0.7 0.50 V 0.34 J ~SH~
79-01-6 Trichloroethene 2.8 0.50 V 0.50 V 2.3
BNAs (ug/L)
117-81-7 Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate 6 5.0 V 5.0 V Ri7t.6rJJ/l@i
Pesticides & PCBs (ug/L)
3 I 9-84-6 Alpha-BHC 0.01 0.010 V 0.010 VJ 0.010 V
5103-71-9 Alpha-chlordane 0.027 0.010 V 0.010 VJ 0.010 V
319-85-7 Beta-BHC 0.01 0.010 V 0.010 VJ 0.008 J
60-57-1 Dieldrin 0.1 0.020 V 0.020 VJ 0.020 V
58-89-9 Gamma-BHC (Lindane) 0.027 0.010 V 0.010 VJ 0.010 V
12789-03-6 Gamma-chlordane 0.027 0.010 V 0.010 VJ 0.010 V
1024-57-3 Heptachlor Epoxide 0.038 0.010 V 0.010 J 0.039 V
lnorganics • Total (ug/L)
7440-41-7 Beryllium 4 0.84 V 0.43 U
7440-4 7-3 Chromium 50 36 J 14 J
7439-96-5 Manganese 50 !!fl!l'lO!Jlffi 'timn:20IrSi
7440-62-2 Vanadium 98 20 J 1.5 R
Note: U = Compound analyzed for but not detected; value is the minimum quantitation limit.
J -Estimated Value
N = Presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Shaded results exceed remediation level.
The remediation levels are defined in the Final ROD dated September 27, 1993.
k:\wp\20064\133\Apr2002-tbls.xls Table 2 • GW MW Data Page 2 of2
Station ID
W-24 (Dup W-25 W-27S W-29
0.23 J 0.50 V 0.50 V m-ns~~
0.50 V 0.50 V 0.50 V 4 J
0.50 V 0.50 V 10 V
0.50 V 0.50 V ~lfJIIJ
0.50 V 0.50 V 0.50 V IO VJ
•5:8-.J 0.30 J ~lli!Ih~
2.7 0.50 V 0.50 V
!li7 !G 11:i 5.0 V 5.0 V \illl!will
0.010 V 0.010 V 0.010 V {0!041~
0.010 V 0.010 V 0.010 V 0.010 V
0.009 J 0.010 V 0.010 V 0.010 V
0.020 V 0.020 V 0.020 V 0.020 V
0.010 V 0.010 V 0.010 V fi0!038~J'ii
0.010 V 0.010 V 0.010 V 0.010 V Bo:o~SrNffl ij!0~76MNlli 0.010 V d1~•1U
0.42 V 3.1 V 4.2 V 0.24 V
15 J 1.6 VJ
Rl30fJ~ 16 J
1.8 J 0.58 J
-,lilllal -
W-29 (Dup)
~s21~m
4 J
10 V
-•fJl&'ll
10 V
I
I
I
I
I
,,
I
I
I
I
u
Casing Elevation
Well (ft msl)
MW-I 949.5
MW-2 954.22
MW-3 954.51
MW-4 965.87
MW-5D 949.45
MW-5S 952.02
MW-6D 957.51
MW-6S 960.52
MW-7 950.69
MW-8 964.2
MW-9 959.42
MW-10 959.08
MW-II 920.5
W-23 934.23
W-24 919.62
W-25 930.01
W-27 947.48
W-29 913.18
• Measured on 23 April 2002
k: \wp\20064 \ 133\Apr2002-Jbls.xls
Table 3
Water Level Data
April 2002
FCX -Statesville OUI
Depth to water* Depth to Bottom
(ft) (ft BTOC)
39.24 47.00
44.57 51.00
39.16 50.00
44.25 54.00
35.75 124.00
37.77 39.00
44.13 150.00
48.82 54.00
38.95 52.00
42.90 57.00
41.35 45.00
47.40 47.00
7.75 20.00
20.55 23.00
8.25 99.00
18.10 24.00
33.01 40.00
2.00 98.00
Page I of I
Water Table Elevation
(ft msl)
910.26
909.65
915.35
921.62
913.70
914.25
913.38
911.70
911.74
921.30
918.07
911.68
912.75
913.68
911.37
911.91
914.47
911.18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Cas Number
108-10-1
1634-04-4
I 08-87-2
75-09-2
104-51-8
103-65-1
91-20-3
99-87-6
135-98-8
I 00-42-5
98-06-6
127-18-4
108-88-3
I 330-20-7
156-60-5
10061-02-6
79-01-6
75-69-4
75-01-4
72-54-8
72.55.9
50-29-3
309-00-2
319-84-6
5103-71-9
3 19-85-7
57.74.9
319-86-8
60-57-1
959-98-8
33213-65-9
1031-07-8
72-20-8
7421-93-4
53494.70.5
58-89-9
12789-03-6
76-44-8
1024-57-3
72.43.5
8001-35-2
Table 5
Influent and Effluent Results
FCX-Statesville OUl
April 2002
Station ID
Compound IN-01 EF-01
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 5.0 U 10 U
Methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) 0.50 U 5.0 U
Methylcyclohexane 0.50 UJ
Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 5.0 U
n-Butylbenzene 5.0 U
n-Propylbenzene 5.0 U
Naphthalene 5.0 U
p-lsopropyltolucnc 5.0 U
sec-butylbcnzcnc 5.0 U
Styrene 0.50 UJ 5.0 U
tcrt-Butylbenzcnc 5.0 U
Tctrachloroctht-'Ilc (PCE) 130 5.0 U
Toluene 0.50 UJ 5.0 U
Total Xylenes 0.50 UJ 5.0 U
Trans-1,2-Dichloroctht.-ne 0.50 U 5.0 U
T rans-1,3-Dichloropmpcne 0.50 UJ 5.0 U
T richlorocthcnc 3.9 J 5.0 U
T richloro nuoromethanc 0.50 U 10 U
Vinyl Chloride 0.50 U 10 U
Pesticides (ug/L)
4,4'-DDD (p,p'-DDD) 0.020 U 0.1 U
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE) 0.020 U 0.1 U
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT) 0.020 U 0.1 U
Aldrin 0.01 U 0.05 U
Alpha-BHC 0.26 0.05 U
Alpha-chlordane 0.010 U
Bcta-BHC 0.40 0.05 U
Chlordane 0.05 U
Delta-BHC 0.083 0.05 U
Dieldrin 0.034 0.1 U
Endosulfan I (alpha) 0.01 U 0.05 U
Endosulfan II (beta) 0.020 U 0.1 U
Endosulfan Sulfate 0.020 U 0.1 U
Endrin 0.020 U 0.1 U
Endrin Aldehyde 0.020 U 0.1 U
Endrin Ketone 0.16
Gamma-BHC (Lindane) 0.18 0.05 U
Gamma-chlordane 0.010 U
Heptachlor 0.01 U 0.05 U
Heptachlor Epoxide 1.4 0.05 U
Methoxychlor 0.10 UJ 0.1 U
Toxaphene 1.0 U 5.0 U
Discharge
Effluent
Limits (u!!'/U
QL
200
QL
5
QL
QL
QL
QL
QL
100
QL
0.7
1000
530
70
QL
2.8
2100
0.0!5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Note: U = Compound analyLed for but not detected; value is the minimum quantitation limit.
J = Estimated Value
N = Presumptive evidence of presence of material.
The discharge limits are set forth in the City of Statesville Discharge Permit No. T•43.
k:\wp\20064\133\A.pr2002-tbls.;ds Table 5-IN & EF Data Page 2 of2
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
Cas Number
630-20-6
71-55-6
79-34-5
76-13-1
79-00-5
75-34-3
75-35-4
563-58-6
87-61-6
96-18-4
120-82-1
95-63-6
96-12-8
106-93-4
95-50-1
107-06-2
78-87-5
108-67-8
541-73-1
142-28-9
106-46-7
594-20-7
110-75-8
95-49-8
106-43-4
67-64-1
71-43-2
108-86-1
74-97-5
75-27-4
75-25-2
74-83-9
75-15-0
56-23-5
108-90-7
75-00-3
67-66-3
74-87-3
156-59-2
10061-01-5
110-82-7
124-48-1
74.95.3
75-71-8
100-41-4
87-68-3
109-59-1
98-82-8
79-20-9
591-78-6
78-93-3
Table 5
Influent and Effluent Results
FCX-Slates,·ille OUl
April 2002
Station ID
Compound IN-01 EF-01
VOCs (ug/L)
I, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.0 U
1, I, 1-T richloroethanc 0.81 5.0 U
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.50 UJ 5.0 U
1, 1,2-T richloro-1,2,2-Tri fluoroethane 22
I, 1,2-T richlorocthane 0.50 UJ 5.0 U
I, 1-Dichloroethane 6.1 7.3
I, 1-Dichloroethene 3.2 5.0 U
I, 1-Dichloropropt.'Tle 5.0 U
1,2,3-T richlorobenzcne 5.0 U
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 5.0 U
1,2,4-T richlorobcnzcne 0.50 U 5.0 U
1,2,4-T rimethylbcrm.'Tle 5.0 U
1,2-Dihromo-3-chloropropane 0.50 UJ 10 U
1,2-Dihromocthane (EDB) 0.50 U 5.0 U
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.50 U 5.0 U
1,2-Dichlorocthane 0.50 U 5.0 U
1,2-Dichloropropane 0.50 UJ 5.0 U
1,3,5-T rimcthylht-'JlZene 5.0 U
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.50 U 5.0 U
1,3-Dichloropropane 5.0 U
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.50 U 5.0 U
2,2-Dichloropropane 5.0 U
2-Chlorocthylvinylether 10 U
2-Chlorotoluene 5.0 U
4-Chlorotoluene 5.0 U
Acetone 5.0 U 240
Benzene 0.50 UJ 5.0 U
Bromobenzene 5.0 U
Bromochloromelhane 5.0 U
Bnimodichloromethane 0.50 UJ 5.0 U
Bromoform 0.50 U 5.0 U
Bromomethane 0.50 U 10 U
Carbon Disulfide 0.50 U 50 U
Carbon T ctrachloride 0.37 J 5.0 U
Chlorobenzcne 0.50 U 5.0 U
Chlomethanc 0.50 U 10 U
Chloroform 3.1 5.0 U
Chloromethane 0.50 U 10 U
cis-1,2-Dichlorocthenc 21 16
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.50 UJ 5.0 U
Cyclohexane 0.50 UJ
Dibromochloromcthanc 0.50 U 5.0 U
Dibromomethanc 5.0 U
Dichloro<lifluoromethane 0.50 U 10 U
Ethylbcnzenc 0.50 UJ 5.0 U
Hcxachlorobutadicne 5.0 U
IPE (lsopropyl Cellosolve) 5.0 U
lsopropylbenzene 0.50 UJ 5.0 U
Methyl Acetate 0.50 UR
Methyl Butyl Ketone 5.0 U 10 U
Methvl ethyl ketone {MEK) 5.0 J 10 U
k:\wp\20064\133\Apr2002-tbfs.xts Table 5 -IN & EF Dala Pagelof2
Discharge
Effluent
Limits (ue/L)
QL
200
QL
QL
QL
700
7
QL
QL
QL
QL
QL
0.025
0.0004
620
0.38
0.56
QL
620
QL
75
QL
QL
QL
QL
700
I
QL
QL
10
0.19
QL
QL
0.3
50
QL
0.19
I
70
QL
QL
QL
QL
1400
29
QL
QL
QL
QL
QL
170
I
I
I
I
I,
ff,
I
I.
·1
I
I
I
Parameter
Hydraulic
Conductivitv (K\
Ton of Anuifer
Bottom of Aquifer
Reference
Hvdraulic Head
Porosity
Well November
RW-1 2.873
RW-2 0.467
RW-3 0.069
Pumping Rates RW-4 0.570
(gallons per RW-5 1.210
minute) RW-6 0.427
RW-7 1.095
RW-8 2.415
RW-9 0.379
RW-10 0.655
Pumping Time 29 ldavs\
Hydraulic Gradient
Storage
Table 4
Modeling Data
November 2001 -April 2002
FCX -Statesville OUI
Value
2.00 feet/day
925.0 feet msl
890.0 feet msl
911.91 feet(W-25)
0.2
December Januarv Februarv
1.009 0.016 0.120
4.594 5.849 0.757
0.040 0.028 0.399
0.677 0.855 0.907
1.448 1.419 1.291
0.998 1.044 1.098
1.217 1.26) 1.241
2.882 2.890 1.812
0.441 0.459 0.437
0.770 0.733 0.691
29 31 23
0.0159 ft/ft
0.001 ft3/ft3
k:lwp\200641133\Apr2002-tbls.xls Table 4 • Modeling Data Page I of I
March Anril Averave
1.607 2.576 1.367
0.357 0.423 2.075
0.804 0.567 0.318
0.789 0.459 0.710
1.081 0.779 1.205
0.982 1.703 1.042
1.135 0.839 1.131
2.054 3.055 2.518
0.410 0.303 0.405
0.627 0.471 0.658
33 28 173
==
Recovery
Well ID Date: 31-0ct
Effluent 236,270.65
RW-I 395 506,32
RW-2 68 337.00
RW-3 66.928.50
RW-4 135 026.23
RW-5 176 240.95
RW-6 165.454.48
RW-7 221422.12
RW-8 407 568.10
RW-9 73 108.21
RW-10 I 16,646.23
Effluent 236,270.65
RW-1 395 506.32
RW-2 68 337.00
RW-3 66 928.50
RW-4 135 026.23
RW-5 176 240.95
RW-6 165 454.48
RW-7 221422.12
RW-8 407 568. 10
RW-9 73,108.21
RW-10 116 646.23
Toial Influent I 826,238.14
Variance I 589 967.49
Davs Elaoscd 36 661.00
A\·era<>e Dailv Effiuent 6.44
Aver.we Dailv Jnnuenl 49.81
AveraRe Oailv CFM 0.00
RW-1 DailvCFM 0.007
RW-2 DailvCFM 0.001
RW-3 Dailv CFM 0.001
RW-4 Dailv CFM 0.003
RW-5 Dailv CFM 0.003
RW-6 DailvCFM 0.003
RW-7 Dailv CFM 0.004
RW-8 Dailv CFM 0.008
RW-9 Dailv CFM 0.001
RW-I0DailvCFM 0.002
Total Daily Influent CFM 0.035
Variance is equal to Total lnfluent minus Effluent
RW · Recovery Well
8-Nov
251 841.50
400 601.42
69 145.41
67.093.32
135 892.00
178 452.55
165.526.64
223 376.83 --
73 782.19
117,846.81
15,570.85
5 095.10
808.4 I
164.82
865.77
2 211.60
72.16
I 954.71
?
673.98
I 200.58
13 047.13
-2 523.72
8.00
I 946.36
1.630.89
1.35
0.442
0.070
0.014
0.D7S
0.192
0.006
0.170
lITC
0.059
0.104
1.133
13-Nov 21-Nov
261 834.7S 278 398.76
403 872.45 409 078.60
69 656.10 70421.98
67 175.65 67.260.30
136 608.12 137 552.65
179 874.98 181951.20
165 576.95 167 221.15
224 646.55 226 545.90
415 223.98 419 720.00
74215.15 74.870.70
118.608.84 I 19,745.20
9 993.25 16.564.01
3271.03 5206.15
510.69 765.88
82.33 84.65
716.12 944.53
1,422.43 2 076.22
50.31 1.644.20
I 269.72 I 899.35
7 655.88 4 496.02
432.96 655.55
762,03 I 136.36
16.173.50 18.908.91
6 180.25 2 344.90
5.00 8.00
I 998.65 2,070.50
3,234.70 2363.61
1.39 1.44
0.454 0.4.52
0.071 0.066
0.01 I 0.007
0.099 0.082
0.198 0.180
0.007 0.143
0.176 0.165
1.069 0.390
0.060 0.057
0.106 0.099
2.252 1.641
RW-2 RW-2 meter spinning conscanlly on 1/25/02. Meter reading was recorded as 133,999.05.
RW-0 meter spinning conscandy on 4/15/02. Meter reading was recorded as 196,724.20.
System down on 5/1/02
lITC • Unable to calculate
k:\wpl20()64\133\Apr2002-tt:,tui. Table 6 -metot readings cu.It
Table 6
Flow Meter Readings (cubic reel)
October 2001 through April 2002
FCX-Statesvllle Operable Unit I
Meter Readlm11 (cubic feeO
29-Nov 3-Dec 14-Dec 20-Dec
286,498.54 294,074.78 314 378.85 323,779.60
411484.25 413 890.S0 41S 768.25 415,780.40
70946.12 71,443.89 75 977.10 82 249.55
67.308.01 67,362.15 67 420.40 67.453.65
138 156.63 138 458.90 140 060.00 140 954.62
182 940.27 183 929.65 187 376.52 189 137.86
168.090.29 168,742.15 171 065.08 172.27!.85
227 496.09 228 352.98 231 II 1.15 232,527.72
421 822.88 423 925.76 430 523.46 433 835.10
75.215.35 75,508.32 76,556.02 77.078.20
120 279.59 120,813.97 122 225.20 123 390.17
8 099.78 7 576.24 20,304.07 9.400.75
2 405.65 2 406.25 I 877.75 12.15
524.14 497.77 4,533.21 6 272.45
47.71 54.]4 58.25 33.25
603.98 302.27 I 601.10 894.62
989.07 989.38 3,446.87 1.761.34
869.14 651.86 2.322.93 I 206.77
950.19 856.89 2 758.17 I 416.57
2.102.88 2 102.88 6 597.70 3.3 I 1.64
344.65 292.97 1,047.70 522.18
534.39 534.38 1411.23 I 164.97
9 371.80 8 688.79 25,654.91 16.595.94
I 272.02 1,112.55 5 350.84 7.195.19
8.00 4.00 11.00 6.00
1,012.47 1.894.06 1,845.82 1.566.79
I 171.48 2 172.20 2,332.26 2,765.99
0.70 1.32 1.28 1.09
0.209 0.418 0.119 0.001
0.045 0.086 0.286 0.726
0.004 0.009 0.004 0.004
0.052 0.052 0.101 0.104
0.086 0.172 0.218 0.204
0.D75 0.113 0.147 0.140
0.082 0.149 0.174 0.164
0.183 0.365 0.417 0.383
0.030 0.051 0.066 0.060
0.046 0.093 0.089 0.135
0.814 I.SOS 1.620 1.921
Page I of2
1!!1!11 -
28-Dec 4-Jan 9-Jan 14-Jan ZS-Jan 29-Jan
335 757.42 346 450.68 353 832.01 360 960.25 377 349.25 383 736.98
415,804.72 415 819.80 415 823.34 415 837.85 415 858.25 415 889.00
97 894,20 109 745.50 115503.70 121 449.01 ----134 691.50
67.507.96 67.539.75 67 560.21 67,577.01 67,630.00 67 667.20
142. 162.68 143 259.89 144,028.23 144,784.70 146,483.38 147 206.92
191 225.98 193 111.75 195,108.52 195 696.50 198,545.00 199 647.20
173 817.08 175 194.80 176 121.84 177 020.35 179115.32 179 994.65
234417.18 236,109.01 237 260.42 238,386.70 240,884.30 241 879.90
438 168.72 442 026.64 ..... 447 214.00 452.836.50 455.048.12
77 749.13 78 345.IO 78.945.97 79,176.50 80,093.35 80 463.15
124 486.25 125.444.82 126,134.61 126 781.25 128,189.13 128.791.15
11 977.82 10.693.26 7,381.33 7 128.24 16,389.00 6 387.73
24.32 15.08 3.54 14.5 ! 20.40 30.75
15 644.65 11 851.30 5 758.20 5 945.31 ? 13 242.49
54.31 31.79 20.46 16.80 52.99 37.20
1.208.06 I 097.21 768.34 756.47 1.698.68 723.54
2 088.12 I 885.77 1 996.77 587.98 2,848.50 I 102.20
I 545.23 1.3 77. 72 927.04 898.51 2 094.97 879.33
I 889.46 I 691.83 I 151.41 I 126.28 2.497.60 995.60
4 333.62 3 857.92 ? 5,187.36 5 622.50 2 211.62
670.93 595.97 600.87 230.53 916.85 369.80
I 096.08 958.57 689.79 646.64 1.407.88 602.02
28,554.78 23.363. 16 11,916.42 15,410.39 17.160.37 20 194.55
16,576.96 12 669.90 4 535.09 8 282.15 771.3 7 13 806.82
8.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 11.00 4.00
1,497.23 1.782.21 1,476.27 1,425.65 1.489.91 1,596.93
3,569.35 3,893.86 2 383.28 3.082.08 1.560.03 5 048.64
1.04 1.24 1.03 0.99 1.03 J.11
0.002 0.002 0.000 0.002 0.001 0.005
1.358 1.372 0.800 0.826 lITC 0.613
0.005 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.006
0.105 0.127 0.107 0.105 0. 107 0.126
0.181 0.218 0.277 0.082 0.180 0.191
0. 134 0.159 0. !29 0.125 0.132 0.153
0.164 0.196 0.160 0.156 0.158 0.173
0.376 0.447 lITC 0.360 0.355 0.384
0.058 0.069 0.083 0.032 0.058 0,064
0.095 0.111 0.096 0.090 0.089 0. 105
2.479 2.704 1.655 1.780 1.083 1.820
1[11111 --Table 6
Flow Meter Readlng5 (cubic feet)
October 2001 through April 2002
FCX-Statesvllle Operable Unll I
Recovny Meter Readln s (cubic (et?ll
Well ID Date: 8-Feb
Effluent 398 592.75
RW-1 4)6,]]3.(l()
RW-2 136 339.60
RW-3 67 829.29
RW-4 148 917.37
RW-5 202 140.41
RW-6 182 019.62
RW-7 244 187.40
RW-8 --
RW-9 81247,54
RW-10 130057.12
Effiucn1 14 855.77
RW-1 224.00
RW-2 1,648.10
RW-3 162.09
RW-4 I 710.45
RW-S 2493.21
RW-6 2 024.97
RW-7 2 307.50
RW-8 ?
RW-9 784.39
RW-10 I 265.97
Total Influent 12 620.68
Variance -2 235.09
Davs Elaoscd 9.00
Avera11e Dailv Effluent I 650.64
Avera11:e Dailv Influent 1 402.30
A veraize Dai Iv CFM 1.15
RW-1 DailvCFM 0.017
RW-2 Dailv CFM 0.127
RW-3 Dailv CFM 0.013
RW-4 Dailv CFM 0.132
RW-5 Dailv CFM 0.192
RW-6 Dailv CFM 0.156
RW-7 DailvCFM 0.178
RW-8 Daily CFM UTC
RW-9 Dailv CFM 0.061
RW-IODailvCFM 0.098
Total Daily lnflllcnt CFM 0.974
Variance is eqt13.l 10 Total lnflllcnt minus Effiuent
R W -Recovery Well
14-Feb
407 037.00
416.240.08
137 163.53
67,933.85
149 898.73
203 518.78
183.219.32
245 532.25
463.069.75
8 I 769.25
130 834.00
8 444.25
127.08
823.93
104.56
98 ! .36
1,378.37
I 199.70
I 344.85
8,021.63
521.71
776.88
IS 280.07
6.835.82
6.00
I 407.38
2 546.68
0.98
0.015
0.095
0.012
0.114
0.160
0.139
0.156
0.371
0.060
0.090
1.211
22-Feb 1-,\f&r
419 973.00 429.933.18
416,424.4] 416 597.85
138 096.48 138.235.77
69 495.90 70 725.77
151.258.42 152 433.47
205 430.37 207 031.75
184 894.88 186.304.25
247 422.80 249 049.14
----
82 394.50 82 936.12
131 865.03 132 725.36
12 936.00 9960,18
184.33 173.44
932.95 139.29
I 562.05 1.229.87
1.359.69 I 175.05
1911.59 I 60!.38
I 675.56 I 409.37
I 890.55 I 626.34
' ?
625.25 541.62
I 031.03 860.33
II 173.00 8 756.69
-1 763.00 -1 203.49
8.00 9.00
I 617.00 I 106.69
I 396.62 972.97
1.12 0.77
0.016 0.013
0.081 0.011
0.136 0.095
0.118 0.091
0.166 0.124
0.145 0.109
0.164 0.125
UTC UTC
0.054 0.042
0.089 0.066
0.970 0.676
RW-2 R W-2 meter spinning constantly on J/25102. Meter reading was recorded as 133,999.05.
R W-6 meter spinning constantly on 4/15/02. Meter reading was recorded as 196,724.20.
System down on 5/1102
UTC -Unable to calculate
k:lwpl200641133\Apr2002-lbls.xl1 Table 6 -meter readlr,g1 cu.n.
8-Mar 12-Mar 18-Mar
439 887.00 445,298.17 460,017.04
416034.12 4!5 916.30 421352.75
138 303.14 138.333.72 139 472.27
71 927.45 72 548.40 73 566.95
153 639.35 154.270.35 !55.260.56
208 619.36 209 436.02 210 839.04
187 709.10 188 437.95 189 732.65
250 653.15 25 I 506.90 252 993.24
···-476 118.02 .....
83 5 !4.34 SJ 806.90 84 372.00
133 635,40 134 088.72 !34 921.52
9 953.82 5411.17 14 718.87
-563.73 -I !7.82 5.436.45
67.37 30.58 I 138.55
1,201.68 620.95 1.018.55
I 205.88 631.00 990.21
1.587.61 8 !6.66 I 403.02
I 404.85 728.85 1.294.70
I 604.01 853.75 1.486.34
' 13 048.27 ?
578.22 292.56 565.10
9\0.o4 453.32 832.80
7 995.93 17 358.12 14 165.72
-1.957.89 11 946.95 -553.15
7.00 4.00 6.00
I 421.97 I 352.79 2453.15
1.142.28 4 339.53 2 360.95
0.99 0.94 1.70
-0.056 -0.020 0.629
0.007 0.005 0.132
0.119 0.108 0.118
0.120 0.110 0.115
0.158 0. 142 0.162
0.139 0.127 0.150
0.159 0.148 0.172
UTC 0.324 UTC
0.057 0.051 0.065
0.090 0.079 0.096
0.793 1.072 1.640
Page 2 of2
.. -..
2s-:-..1ar 2-Anr 12-Anr 15-Anr 2J-Anr
474.570.90 488,939.50 510 756.83 512 775.56 522,247.40
426,470.00 431.250.53 438.504.35 439 145.82 442 036.27
]40.323.27 141.140.65 142 250.18 142 375.53 142,825.75
74,548.68 n 589.35 77,157.38 77 304.40 77 962.77
156 197.75 157 044.00 158.299.78 158419.13 158 958.15
212.221.50 213.552. 10 215.742.10 215.959.80 216,906.60
191 059.28 192311.25 194 213.87 ..... 197 568.87
254 543.33 256 069.92 258.392.40 258 623.92 259,571.56
-485 863.52 491.066.53 491 562.35 493.760.27
84,963.00 85J22.87 86 347.20 86 425.59 86 783.02
135 800.95 136644.15 137 938.50 138 062.35 138,637.02
14,553.86 14 368.60 21,817.33 2 018.73 9471.84
5 117.25 4 780.53 7 253.82 641.47 2 890.45
851.00 817.38 I 109.53 125.35 450.22
981.73 I 040.67 1.568.03 147.02 658.37
937.19 846.25 1,255.78 119.35 539.02
1,382.46 1.330.60 2 190.00 217.70 946.80
1 326.63 1.251.97 !,902.62 ' 3,355.00
I 550.09 1 526.59 2 322.48 231.52 947.64
? 9.745.50 5 203.01 495.82 2 197.92
591.00 559.87 824.33 78.39 357.43
879.43 843.20 I 294.35 123.85 574.67
13 616.78 22 742.56 24 923.95 2 180.47 12 917.52
-937.08 8.373.96 3 106.62 161.74 3 445.68
7.00 7.00 !0.00 3.00 8.00
2 079.12 2 052.66 2 181.73 672.91 I, 183.98
I 945.25 3.248.94 2.492.39 726.82 I 614.69
1.44 1.43 1.52 0.47 0.82
0.508 0.474 0.504 0. 148 0.251
0.084 0.08 I 0.077 0.029 0.039
0.097 0. !03 0.109 0.034 0.057
0.093 0.084 0.087 0.028 0.047
0.137 0.132 0.152 0.050 0.082
0.132 0. !24 0.132 UTC 0.291
0.154 0.151 0.161 0.054 0.082
UTC 0.338 0.361 0. ! 15 0.191
0.059 0.056 0.057 0.018 0.031
0.087 0.084 0.090 0.029 0.050
1.351 1.628 1.731 0.505 1.121
-Illa
Recovery
Well ID Date: 31-0ct
Effiuent I 767 304.46
RW-1 2.958J87.27
RW-2 511 160.76
RW-3 500 625. 18
RW-4 I 009.996.20
RW•S 1318,282.31
RW-6 1,237 599.51
RW-7 1.6S6.237.46
RW-8 3 048,609.39
RW-9 546 849.41
RW-10 872 513.80
Effiuent 76 095.91
RW-1 25 093.68
RW-2 4,153.27
RW-3 I 070.01
RW-4 4 576.86
RW-5 10 852.36
RW-6 173.39
RW-7 9 328,98
RW-8 22 606.06
RW-9 3,290.38
RW-IO 5 940.84
Total Influent 87 085.83
Variance 10 989.92
Davs Elansed #REF!
Averal!e Daily Effiuent #REF!
Avera11e Dailv Influent #REF!
Averal!e Dailv Effluent GPM #REF!
RW-1 DailvGPM #REF!
RW-2 Dailv GPM #REF!
RW-3 Daily GPM #REF!
RW-4 Dailv GPM #REF!
RW-5 Dai!vGPM #REF!
RW-6 DailyGPM #REF!
RW-7 Dai!vGPM #REF!
RW-8 Dai!v GPM #REF!
RW•9 Daily GPM #REF!
RW-10 DailvGPM #REF!
Total Dailv Influent GPM #REF!
Variance is equal 10 Total Influent minus Effluent
RW -Recovery Well
RW - 2 meter spinning constantly on 1/25/02.
RW-6 meter spinning constantly on 4/i 5/02.
System down on 5/!/02
19
8-Nov
I 883 774.42
2 996.498.62
517207.67
501 858.03
1 016.472.16
J 334 825.07
I 238 139.27
1,670,858.69
551890.78
88 ! 494.14
! !6 469.96
38 111.35
6,046.91
I 232.85
6 475.96
16 542.77
539.76
14 62!.23
5 041.37
8 980.34
97 S92.53
-18 877.43
8.00
14.558,74
12 199.07
10.11
3.3083
0.5249
0. !070
0.5621
1.4360
0.0469
1.2692
0.4376
0.7795
8.4716
k:\wp\200641133\A.pr2002-~s.xl5 Table 7 • meter n,ad!ngs g.als
13-Nov
I 958 523.93
3.020.965.93
52! 027.63
502 473.86
1.021.828.74
I 345 464,85
1,238 515.59
1.680.356.19
3,!05 875.37
555 129.32
887. 194.12
74 749.51
24.467.30
3 819,96
615.83
5.356.58
10,639.78
376.32
9 497.51
57 265.98
3 238.54
5 699.98
!20.977.78
46 228.27
5.00
14 949,90
24 195.56
10.38
3.3982
0.5306
0.0855
0.7440
1.4777
0.0523
1.3191
3.0591
0.4498
0.7917
11.9079
21-Nov
2 082 422.72
3.059,907.93
526 756.41
503 107.04
1.028.893.82
J 360994.98
1250814,20
1.694.563.33
3 139 505.60
560 032.84
895.694.10
123 898.79
38.942.00
5 728.78
633.18
7 065.08
15 530.13
12.298.62
14,207.14
33 630.23
4,903.51
8 499.97
!41.438.65
17,539.85
8.00
15 487.35
17 679.83
10.76
3.3804
0.4973
0.0550
0.6!33
!.348 !
l.0676
l.2333
2.9!93
0.42S7
0. 73 78
12.2777
--Table 7
Flow Meter Reading1 (gallons)
October 2001 through Aprll 2002
FCX-State1vllle Operable Unit I
Meter Readlno1 toatlonsl
29-Nov 3-Dec 14-Dec
2 143 009.08 2 199 679.35 2 35 l 553.80
3.077,902.!9 3,095,900.94 3 109,946.51
530 676.98 534,400.30 568,308.71
503,463.91 503 868.88 504 304.59
l.033 411.59 1.035,672.57 !,047,648.80
I 368 393.22 I 375,793.78 I 401 576.37
I 257,3!5.37 I 262,191.28 I 279 566.80
1.701 670.75 1,708,080.29 1,728 711.40
3 155 235.14 3,170964.68 3,220.315.48
562 610.82 564 802.23 572 639.03
899.691.33 903 688.50 914,244.50
60 586.35 56.670.28 15! 874.44
17 994.26 17 998.75 14 045.57
3 920.57 3 723.32 33,908.41
356.87 404.97 435.71
4517.77 2 260.98 I 1.976.23
7 398.24 7 400.56 25 782.59
6 501. !7 4,875.9! 17.375.S2
7,107.42 6,409.54 20,63 \.11
15 729.54 15,729.54 49 350.80
2,577.98 2,191.42 7.836.80
3 997.24 3.997. 16 JO 556.00
70 101.06 64992.15 191 898.73
9 514.71 8 321.87 40.024.28
8.00 4.00 11.00
7 573.29 14 !67.57 13 806.77
8 762.63 16 248.04 !7,445.34
5.26 9.84 9.59
1.5620 3.1248 0.8867
0.3403 0.6464 2.1407
0.0310 0.0703 0.0275
0.3922 0.3925 0.7561
0.6422 1.2848 1.6277
0.5643 0.8465 1.0969
0.6170 1.1128 1.3025
1.3654 2.7308 3.1156
0.2238 0.3805 0.4947
0.3470 0.6940 0.6664
6.0852 11.2834 12.1148
Page! of2
-.. -
20-Dec 28-Dec 4-Jan 9-Jan 14-Jan 25-Jiin
2 421 871.41 2 51! 465.50 2591451.09 2 646 663.43 2 699.982.67 2,822 572.39
3 110 037.39 3 110,2!9.31 3110.332.10 3,110,358.58 3,110,467.12 3 I 10 619.7!
6!5 226.63 732,248.62 820 896.34 863,967.68 908 438.59
504 553.30 504.959.54 505 !97.33 sos 350.3 7 505 476.03 505,872.40
1,054,340.56 1,063 376.85 1.071 583.98 1.077,331.16 1,082,989.56 1,095,695.68
1,414,751.19 1.430 370.33 1,444 475.89 !,459,411.73 1,463 809.82 I 485 116.60
1 288.593.44 1300 151.76 1,310,457.10 1317,391.36 1,324 112.22 1,339,782.59
1.739,307.35 1.753,440.51 1,766,095.39 1,774,707.94 1,783,132.52 I 801 814.56
3 245 086.55 3 277 502.03 3.306 359.27 3 345 160.72 3 387 217.02
576 544.94 58].563.49 586 021.35 590.515.86 592 240.22 599 098.26
922 958.47 931 !57.15 938 327.25 943 486.88 948 323.75 958 854.69
70,317.61 89.594.09 79.985.58 55 212.3S 53319.24 122,589.72
90.88 181.91 I 12.80 26.48 108.53 152.59
46 917.93 117,021.98 88,647.72 43 071.34 44 470.92
248.7! 406.24 237.79 153.04 125.66 396.37
6.691.76 9 036.29 8207.13 5747,18 5 658.40 12706.13
13 174,82 15 619.14 14 105.56 14,935.84 4 398.09 21 306.78
9,026.64 11,558.32 10,305.35 6 934.26 6 720.85 15 670.38
10 595.94 14133.16 12,654.89 8,6!2.55 8 424.57 18 682.05
24,771.07 32.415.48 28 857.24 38 801.45 42,056.30
3,905.91 5,018.56 4 457.86 4 494.5 l I 724.36 6 858.04
8 713.98 8 198.68 7 170. !O 5 159.63 4,836.87 JO 530.94
124,137.63 213 589.75 174 756.44 89 !34.82 115 269.72 128 359.57
53,820.02 123,995.66 94,770.85 33,922.47 6! 950.48 5 769.85
6.00 8.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 11.00
11 719.60 11 199.26 !3 330.93 l l 042.47 10 663.85 11 144.52
20,689.61 26 698.72 29 126.07 !7 826.96 23 053.94 11 669.05
8.14 7.78 9.26 7.67 7.41 7.74
0.0!05 0.0!58 0.0131 0.0037 0.015 ! 0.0096
5.4303 10.1582 10.2602 5.9821 6, 1765
0.0288 0.0353 0.0275 0.0213 0,0175 0.0250
0.7745 0.7844 0.9499 0.7982 0.7859 0.8022
1.5249 1.3558 1.6326 2.0744 0.6108 1.3451
1.0447 !.0033 1.1927 0.9631 0.9335 0.9893
1.2264 l.2268 1.4647 1.1962 1.1701 1.1794
2.8670 2.8 !38 3.3400 2.6945 2.6551
0.4521 0.4356 0.5160 0.6242 0.2395 0.4330
1.0086 0,7117 0.8299 0.7166 0.6718 0.6648
!4.3678 18.5408 20.2264 12.3798 13.3151 8.1035
--
Recovery
Well ID Date: 29-Jan
Effluent 2,870 352.61
RW-1 3 I IO 849.72
RW-2 I 007 492.42
RW-3 506 150.66
RW-4 I 101 107.76
RW-5 I 493 361.06
RW-6 I 346 359.98
RW-7 I.809 261.65
RW-8 3 403 759.94
RW-9 601 864.36
RW-10 963.357.80
Effluent 47 780.22
RW-1 230.01
RW-2 99 053.83
RW-3 278.26
RW-4 5 412.08
RW-5 8 244.46
RW-6 6 577.39
RW-7 7 447.09
RW-8 16 542.92
RW-9 2766.10
RW-10 4 503.11
Total Influent 151 055.23
Variance 103 275.01
Davs Elai,scd 4.00
Averal'e Dailv Effluent 11 945.06
Avcrn11:e Daily Influent 37 763.8 l
Avcra1>e Dailv Effluent GPM 8.30
RW-l DailvGPM 0.0399
RW-2 Dailv GPM 4.5858
RW-3 Dailv GPM 0.0483
RW-4 Dailv GPM 0.9396
RW-5 Dailv GPM 1.4313
RW-6 Dailv GPM 1.1419
RW-7 DailvGPM 1.2929
RW-8 Dailv GPM 2.8720
RW-9 Dailv GPM 0.4802
RW-10 Dailv GPM 0.7818
Total Daily Influent GPM 13.6138
Variance is equal to Total Influent minus Effluent
RW -Rc:covcry Well
RW - 2 meter spinning constantly on 1/25/02.
RW-6 meter spinning constantly on 4/15/02.
System dO"Wn on 5/1/02
iiillll
8-Feb
2 981 473.77
3 112 525.24
1.019.820.21
507 363.09
1.113,901.93
1.512.010.27
I 361 506.76
I 826 521.75
607 731.60
972 827.26
11112l.16
I 675.52
12 327.79
I 212.43
12 794.17
18 649.21
15 146.78
17,260. JO
5 867.24
9 469.46
94 402.69
-16 718.47
9.00
12 346.80
10 489.19
8.57
0.1293
0,9512
0.0936
0.9872
1.4390
1.1687
1.3318
0.4527
0.7307
7.2842
k:\wp\2006A\13Jl,&.p(2002-lbll .• ll Table 7 • meter readings gall
14-Feb 22-Feb
3 044 636.76 3 141 398.04
3 I 13 475.80 3 114 854.59
1.025.983.20 1.032.961.67
508 145.20 519829.33
1.121 242.50 1.131412.98
1.522.320.47 1.536.619.17
I 370 480.51 1.383 013.70
I 836 581.23 I 850 722.54
3.463.761.73
611 633.99 616310.86
978 638.32 986 350.42
63 162.99 96 761.28
950.56 l 378.79
6163.00 6 978.47
782.11 11684.13
7 340.57 JO 170.48
10310.21 14 298.69
8973.76 12 533.19
10 059.48 14141.31
60 001.79
3 902.39 4 676.87
5811.06 7712.10
I 14 294.92 83 574.04
51 131.93 -13,187.24
6.00 8.00
10 527.17 12 095.16
19049.15 !0,446.75
7.31 8.40
0.1 JOO 0.1197
0.7133 0.6058
0.0905 1.0142
0.8496 0.8829
I.I 933 1.24 I 2
1.0386 1.0880
1.1643 1.2275
2.7779
0.4517 0.4060
0.6726 0.6695
9.0618 7.2547
Table 7
Flow Meter Re11dlngs (gallons)
October 2001 lhrough April 2002
FCX-Sta1e1vllle Operable Unit I
NIii -
Meter Readin•s r~allons1
1-Mar 8-Mar 12-Mar 18-Mar 25-Mar
3215900.19 3 290 354.76 3 330 830.3 I 3 440 927.46 3 549,790.33
3 116151.92 3.11 I 935.22 3 111,053.92 J 151.71U7 3 189,995.60
1.034.003.56 I 034.507.49 I 034. 736.23 I 043 252.58 I 049 618.06
529 028.76 538 017.33 542 662.03 550 280.79 557 624.13
1 140 202.36 I 149,222.34 I 153 942.22 1,161.348.99 1-168-359.17
1.548.597.49 1.560472.81 I 566 581.43 I 577,076.02 I 587 416.82
I 393 555.79 I 404 064.07 I 409 515.87 I 419 200.22 I 429 123.41
1.862 887.57 1.874 885.56 1.881.271.61 1,892,389.44 \.903,984.11
3 561 362.79
620,362.18 624 687.26 626 875.61 63 I 102.56 635 523.24
992,78H9 999.592.79 1.002.983.63 l-009.212.97 l.015.791.l I
74 502. IS 74 454.57 40,475.55 110.097.15 108 862.87
l.297.33 -4216.70 -881.29 40,664.65 38,277.03
I 041.89 503.93 228.74 8 516.35 6 365.48
9 199.43 8 988.57 4 644.71 7618,75 7 343.34
8789.37 9 019.98 4 719.88 7.406.77 7 010.18
11 978.32 11 875.32 6 108.62 10.494.59 10,340.80
10 542.09 JO 508.28 5451.80 9 684.36 9 923.19
12,165.02 11 997.99 6 386.05 11,117.82 ! I 594.67
97,601.06
4 OS 1.32 4 325.09 2 188.35 4 226.95 4 420.68
6 435.27 6 807. !0 3 390.83 6 229.34 6 578. 14
65 500.04 59 809.56 129 838.74 105,959.59 JOI 853.51
-9,002.11 -14 645.02 89 363.19 -4,137.56 -7.009.36
9.00 7.00 4.00 6.00 7.00
8 278.02 JO 636.37 10,! 18.89 18,349.52 15.551.84
7,277.78 8,544.22 32,459.68 17,659.93 14,550.50
5.75 7.39 7.03 !2.74 10.80
0.1001 -0.4183 -0.1530 4,7066 3.7973
0.0804 0.0500 0.0397 0.9857 0.6315
0.7098 0.8917 0.8064 0.8818 0.7285
0.6782 0.8948 0.8194 0.8573 0.6955
0.9243 1.1781 1.0605 l.2147 1.0259
o.s 134 1.0425 0,9465 1.1209 0.9344
0.9387 1. 1903 1.1087 1.2868 !.I 503
2.4207
0.3126 0.4291 0.3799 0.4892 0.4386
0.4965 0.6753 0.5887 0.7210 0.6526
5.0540 5.9335 8.0175 12.2638 10.1045
Page 2 of2
--
2-Anr 12-A~r 15-Anr 23-Anr
3 657 267.46 3 820 461.09 3 835 561.!9 3 906 410.55
3 225 753.96 J.280012.54 3,284 810.73 3 306 431.30
I 055 732.06 I 064031.35 I 064 96S.96 I 068 336.61
565 408.34 577 137.20 578 236.91 583 161.52
I 174 689.12 1.184.082.35 1 184,975.09 l,!89006.96
I 597 369.71 1613 750.91 1 615 379.30 I 622,461.37
I 438 488.15 1452 719.75 1,477 815.15
1,915.403.00 193277.5.15 I 934 506.92 1,941 595.27
3 634 259.13 3 673 177.64 3 676 886.38 3,693 326.82
639,711.07 645 877.06 646 463.4 I 649 136.99
1 022,098.24 I 03 l 779.98 I 032 706.38 I 037004.91
107477.13 163 193.63 15 JOO.JO 70 849.36
35 758.36 54 258.57 4 798.20 21 620.57
6,114.00 8.299.28 937.62 3 367.65
7 784.21 11 728.86 I 099.71 4 924.61
6 329.95 9 393.23 892.74 4031.87
9 952.89 16 381.20 I 628.40 7 082.06
9 364,74 14,23 !.60 25 095.40
11 418.89 17 372.15 I 73 l.77 7 088.35
72.896.34 38.918.51 3.708.73 16 440.44
4.187.83 6 165.99 586.36 2 673.58
6,307.14 9.681.74 926.40 4 298.53
170,114.35 186431.15 16 309.92 96 623.05
62,637.22 23,237.52 1,209.82 25.773.69
7.00 10,00 J 00 8.00
15 353.88 16.319.36 5 033.37 8.856.17
24 302.05 18643.11 5 436.64 12 077.88
10.66 11.33 3.50 6.15
3.5475 3.7680 1.1107 1.8768
0.6065 0.5763 0.2170 0.2923
0.7722 0.8145 0.2546 0.4275
0.6280 0.6523 0.2067 0.3500
0.9874 1.1376 0.3769 0.6148
0.9290 0.9883 1.5843
!.1328 1.2064 0.4009 0.6153
2.53 I I 1.1261 0.1288 0.5437
0.415S 0.4282 0.1357 0.2321
0.6257 0.6723 0.2144 0.3731
12.1758 11.3700 3.0457 6.9098
. '
_.,-.• .. ·-,. ':· , .. ,,
",.~ ..
'\ ~--. :· .. ~--
:;.:; . ., . ~ '-"
.-! .•: _._ ... ~ ... . ,-.
. -.'.•\'. ·, .. ,'t
,,
.. ,:·:
-·-:'!·--,
,.,' ....... _;
. '
-:' .... -,: ~:
~ ~-,-. . .
;: ~. ~·' f
·, -': • j
·-...
. --. .. ,··
.,.,•""::"t ..
,: .•
. •t'' ·•.· ,,
' .. •.
•;: .• '; :-· j . •,· ', . . , ~ ., , ' .. :.
:,.•'' . ... · ... ,.
,·s
4 '>· :· -::'-.. ·
'
_.,,: .. ' .
: ; ~:,: . '\ ~.::
. ·~.,:·:/{·~<!( :·> .
.. ;. ,<-~·_ ... ,.,
._ ..... ·-. ~ . " ..
'~-( .:~~ :.r:. './
,-, . . . -_
,\.•/'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX A
CITY DISCHARGE PERMIT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Qtitu nf
~tattnuillt
ll). (IJ). l!!ux 1111 • %tatesuille. Nort~ Qlarolina 28687
August 8, 2000
OOCUMENTCONTHO~-~~!iu~, BF:W.£'.!Z,~z.f:?;_4 r:r 6r 1<---·--.... ' .
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Suite 200
5405 Metric Place
Norcross, GA 30092-2550
Re: Modification to Permit No. T-43
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site
Dear Mr. Ferentz:
We have approved your request, stated in your letter of July 13, 2000, for the modification in
language on your Effluent Limits page of Permit T-43. Enclosed is a revised copy of this page
for your permit. 1bis change is effective as of the date of this letter.
If you have any questions, please call at [phone].
Sincerely, . (2~-£ .
Carol Rogers, ~nt Coordinator
Water Resources Department
Enclosure
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,,.;_ ,;., Am ~'-IUQ;;, AG.?K
· Permit No, T-43
EFFLUENT LIMITS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Parameter Permit Limit **F uency
Volatile *<MCL I/quarter
hydrocarbons
Pesticides <1.0 ug/1 Grab I/quarter
*MCL -North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards or the minimum Quantitation Limit
(QL) if the MCL is less than the QL, or if none exist, delimit to the QL.
**Frequency-Quarters will start in January, Aprii July and October
Collection of sample and analysis is the sole responsibility of the Permittee. Results should be
submitted to the Director of Water Resources Department within 30 days of the sample event.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C!titu of
DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBER . .
·.·.· · . ..~ '\= LU0Lj1-3/j:.:':~
:§tattn uillt
lll-QI)_ i!,lox 1111 • §tatrsuillr. Nori~ (!]arolina 28687
April 19, 2000
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Suite 200
5405 Metric Place
Norcross, GA 30092-2550
Re: Revision to Permit T-43
FCX-Statesville Superfimd Site
Dear Mr. Ferentz:
Enclosed is a revised limit page to your permit, No. T-43. These revisions include: the
addition of Pesticides monitoring; the phrase describing what limit applies if a parameter is not
included in the North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards; and, a clarification of who is
responsible for sampling. Please insert this page in your permit and remove the old page.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
(}aJ. lo
Carol Rogers, ~reatment Coordinator
Water Resources Department
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DOCUMENT CONTROL l·iUMBfR .... ,, ,
Rl=kJOtf7:::;0 ":~~ £-'(
Permit No. T-43
EFFLUENT LIMITS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Parameter
Volatile
hydrocarbons
Pesticides
Permit Limit
*<MCL
<1.0 ug/1
Sam leType °Frequency
Grab I/quarter
Grab I/quarter
*MCL-North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards or if none exist, default to Detection
Limit.
**Frequency-Quarters will start in January, Apri~ July and October
Collection of sample and analysis is the sole responsibility of the Permittec. Resuhs should be
submitted to the Director of Water Resources Department within 30 days of the sample event.
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Qtitu of
§tatrnuill.e
jp. @. l!lox Jill • matrsuillr. Nortl) <fuirolina 28687
April 14, 2000
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Suite 200
5405 Metric Place
Norcross, GA 30092-2550
Re: Transmittal of Permit T-43
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site
Dear Mr. Ferentz:
In accordance with your letter requesting the renewal of a discharge pennit, we arc forwarding
herewith the subject City Discharge Permit. This pennit is issued pursuant to the requirements
of the City of Statesville Sewer Use Code.
If any parts, measurements, frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit arc
unacceptable to you, you may request a modification by written request to the Director
identifying the specific issues to be contended. Unless such a request is made within 30 days
following receipt of this permit, this permit shall be final and binding.
This permit does not effect or satisfy any requirements of the City of Statesville other than the
above referenced.
Please sign and return a copy of the receipt page of this permit to our office. If you have any
questions, please contact Carol Rogers at [phone].
Sincerely,
CON)_ tr;,w A L. F. "Joe" Hudson, Jr., Director
Water Resources Department
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
PERMIT NO. T-43
PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
SEWER USE ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF STATESVILLE
Pursuant to the City of Statesville Sewer Use Ordinance (here-after referred to as 'The
Ordinance"), other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the City of
Statesville, as amended, and pursuant to the Permit Application (here-after referred to as 'The
Application'') heretofore filed with the City of Statesville, FCX-Statesville Superfund Site,
(here-after rererred to as "Permittee") is hereby authorized to discharge groundwater to
sanitary sewers of the City of Statesville (here-after referred to as 'The City'') in accordance
with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and special conditions contained herein..
All such discharges shall be made at discharge locations approved in advance by the City.
This permit shall become effective on April 17, 2000.
This permit and the authoriz.ation to discharge shall expire at midnight April 17, 2005.
Signed this the Kdayof {Jpc; I I Jm .
Water Resources Department
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Permit No. T-43
SPEOAL CONDffiONS
I. Permittee shall discharge at a rate not to exceed I 00 gallons per minute (GPM). Flow must be monitored by a City approved meter, which is accessible to the meter reader. A billing account must be established with Collections at City Hall prior to discharge.
2. The Permittee shall operate and maintain an efficient pretreatment system.
3. The discharge is subject to all requirements of the City ofStatesville's Sewer Use Ordinance. Failure to meet these requirements and those listed in this permit will subject the Permittee lo fines and possible termination of the permit.
I
I
I
I
I · Description of Discharges
01
Permit No. T-43
Description
Treated groundwater
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The sampling point for Pipe O I is the sampling port off pretreatment system
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Permit No. T-43
EFFLUENT LIMITS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Parameter
Volatile
hydrocarbons
Permit Limit
*<MCL
*MCL-North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards
* *Frequency -Quarters will start in January, Apri~ July and October
I/quarter
Results should be submitted to the Director of Water Resources Department within 30 days of
the sample event. ·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
➔A"' · '-'YIJMENT CGNTHO' ,•.iw; .. ,n ,,·,., -..... ~,...,,._~\
~tiH,J3coN"t1-f~-;~n~-;ms e:::jft~
Receipt of the foregoing Permit is acknowledged. This the Ii day of A-'{)/2. \ L
2000.
Name of Pennittee
By~&1~
Ad ~5 Hzrfllt ~ SIE uX) I
~Uvss 6A: Jci:xi'2.
:, I ;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIXB
SYSTEM CHECK FORMS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
November 16, 2001
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5405 Metric Place -Suite 200
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Forms
Dear Mr. F crcntz;
a, 19 2001
Enclosed are the FCX System Check Forms for the weeks ending November 9th
and November 16'\ 2001.
As noted on the form dated November 13, 2001, the regulator for RW-6 was
replaced.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
s~~/-
Brad Burdick
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • fox: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 11/8/01
Tessa Houck
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 251,841.50 cit
RW-1 400,601.42 cit
RW-2 69,145.41 cit
RW-3 67,093.32 cit
RW-4 135,982.00 cit
RW-5 178,452.55 cit
RW-6 165,526.64 cit
RW-7 223,376.83 cit
RW-8 -cit
RW-9 73,782.19 cit
RW-10 117,846.81 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
57.05 Point
57.26 SF-1
37.41 SF-1
42.82 SF-2
50.41 SF-2
42.00
50.62
-
59.61
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 24
Effluent 22
Influent 22
Effluent 20
59.31 Any leaks observed: No -----------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 11/13/01
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 261,834.75 cit
RW-1 403,872.45 cit
RW-2 69,656.10 cit
RW-3 67,175.65 cit
RW-4 136,608.12 cit
RW-5 179,874.98 cit
RW-6 165,576.95 cit
RW-7 224,646.55 cit
RW-8 415,223.98 cit
RW-9 74,215.15 cit
RW-10 118,608.84 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
Nonroutine Hours
1.0
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
--While TP #2 is running.
59.45 Point Pressure (PSI)
57.45 SF-1 Influent 22
37.65 SF-1 Effluent 21
48.25 SF-2 Influent 21
53.40 SF-2 Effluent 20
54.77
51.00
51.68
59.69
56.30 Any leaks observed: No -----------
Upon arrival a submersible pump was placed in the retaining pond to begin draining the water.
Replaced the regulator for RW-6 with a new regulator. RW-6 was running as designed upon
departure.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
December 17, 2001
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5405 Metric Place -Suite 200
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
~~vt.DS'l,1>~
"Z' . . , 1-
, . --
C/l u Q ~
;\rcES;,:
\8 re 1 r
i~{(C 21 'lll\
. ·z;w 1 :.1-14-A\OT OOCUMENTCONTROLNUMl.1W..! I. .. " .. ' • ----..
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Forms
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed are the FCX System Check Forms for the weeks ending November 21,
November 29, December 3, and December 14, 2001.
All repair work performed during this time period is described in detail on the
System Check Forms.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely;
~~
Brad Burdick
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • fax: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 11/21/01
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 278,398.76 cft
RW-1 409,078.60 cft
RW-2 70,421.98 cft
RW-3 67,260.30 cft
RW-4 137,552.65 cft
RW-5 181,951.20 cft
RW-6 167,221.15 cit
RW-7 226,545.90 cft
RW-8 419,720.00 cft
RW-9 74,870.70 cft
RW-10 119,745.20 cft
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
---
59.95 Point
56.65 SF-1
37.80 SF-1
49.10 SF-2
56.50 SF-2
56.13
57.02
53.16
59.65
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 21
Effluent 20
Influent 20
Effluent 19
55.93 Any leaks observed: No -----------
DOCUMENT CONlROL NUMBER.._b.~ ... ,:;,;;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 11129101
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 286,498.54 cft
RW-1 411,484.25 cit
RW-2 70,946.12 cft
RW-3 67,308.01 cft
RW-4 138,156.63 cft
RW-5 182,940.27 cft
RW-6 168,090.29 cft
RW-7 227,496.09 cft
RW-8 421,822.88 cft
RW-9 75,215.35 cft
RW-10 120,279.59 cft
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
No
DEC 2 1 2001
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: No
Sand Filter Readings
----While TP #2 is running.
45.56 Point Pressure (PSI)
56.25 SF-1 Influent 20
37.65 SF-1 Effluent 19
47.34 SF-2 Influent 19
55.25 SF-2 Effluent 18
56.65
55.72
50.33
58.78
60.23 Any leaks observed: No -----------
Received page at 10:00 PM on 11-28-01. Arrived to site at 4:30 PM on 11-29-01. System was
down upon arrival due to a high alarm in the backwash tank and trickle filter sump. Both tanks
. were manually drained and the system was restarted. As soon as TP#2 turned on it began
filling the backwash tank immediately. The system was shut off and the check valve on the
_backwash tank was removed for inspection. The valve had a cracked section and was leaking.
The part was not in stock at the plumbing store and was ordered. The system remained off
upon leaving the site.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
Date: · 12/3/01
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 294,074.78 cft
RW-1 413,890.50 cft
RW-2 71,443.89 cft
RW-3 67,362.15 cft
RW-4 138,458.90 cft
. RW-5 183,929.65 cft
RW-6 168,742.15 cft
RW-7 228,352.98 cft
RW-8 423,925.76 cft
RW-9 75,508.32 cft
RW-10 120,813.97 cft
Pescdbe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
No
--
45.22 Point
57.21 SF-1
37.70 SF-1
47.25 SF-2
56.13 SF-2
56.63
55.54
49.80
59.76
· Nonroutine Hours
1.0
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 18
Effluent 16
Influent 16
Effluent 16
62.42 Any leaks observed: ______ N_o.c_ ____ _
Replaced the broken union at the check valve on the backwash tank. Restarted system and
noticed that the backwash tank was still filling when TP#2 turned on. System was turned off
and the solenoid valve for the backwash tank was taken apart and cleaned. The valve was
cleaned and replaced and the system turned back on. The system was monitored for 3 complete
cycles and was running as designed. Next, the system was turned off to change the oil in the air
compressor. One and a half fresh quarts of oil were added and then the system was restarted.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
12/14/01
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 314,378.85 cft
RW-1 415,768.25 cft
RW-2 75,977.10 cft
RW-3 67,420.40 cft
RW-4 140,060.00 cft
RW-5 187,376.52 cft
RW-6 171,065.08 cft
RW-7 231,111.15 cft
RW-8 430,523.46 cft
RW-9 76,556.02 cft
RW-10 L ~ -12,522.52-cft
(/,sj 12.:z.., 2. z.s. ~
. ,..,...~n, ·-•--'·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
---
35.65 Point
57.39 SF-1
37.29 SF-1
47.97 SF-2
52.10 SF-2
50.35
55.62
53.95
59.62
Nonroutine Hours
2.0
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent
Effluent
Influent
Effluent
60.65 Any leaks observed: ______ N.c.o ____ _
Upon arrival there was a leak in the plumbing effluent for TP#1. The plumbing was removed and
replaced. Also, the pond outside the remediation shed was almost overflowing with water from
the rain. A sump pump was placed in the pond and was allowed to drain.
It took about two hours to get the pond drained to an acceptable level.
DOCUMENT CONlROL NUMB~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
January 21, 2001
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5405 Metric Place -Suite 200
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Forms
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed are the FCX System Check Forms for the period between December 14,
2001 and January 18, 2002.
Any repair work performed during this time period is described in detail on the
System Check Forms.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely·
Brad Burdi
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • Fox: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 12/20/01
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 323,779.60 cit
RW-1 415,780.40 cit
RW-2 82,249.55 cit
RW-3 67,453.65 cit
RW-4 140,954.62 cit
RW-5 189,137.86 cit
RW-6 172,271.85 cit
RW-7 232,527.72 cit
RW-8 433,835.10 cit
RW-9 77,078.20 cit
RW-10 123,390.17 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
--
35.83 Point
39.10 SF-1
37.57 SF-1
47.88 SF-2
55.66 SF-2
55.01
56.80
51.18
59.72
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 21
Effluent 20
Influent 19
Effluent 18
59.95 Any leaks observed: No -----------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 12/28/01
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 335,757.42 cft
RW-1 415,804.72 cft
RW-2 97,894.20 cft
RW-3 67,507.96 cft
RW-4 142,162.68 cft
RW-5 191,225.98 cft
RW-6 173,817.08 cft
RW-7 234,417.18 cft
RW-8 438,168.72 cft
RW-9 77,749.13 cft
RW-10 124,486.25 cft
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
35.50 Point
39.20 SF-1
37.35 SF-1
48.93 SF-2
54.55 SF-2
53.40
54.00
53.98
59.87
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 22
Effluent 21
Influent 20
Effluent 19
60.02 Any leaks observed: No -----------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 1/4/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 346,450.68 cit
RW-1 415,819.80 cit
RW-2 109,745.50 cit
RW-3 67,539.75 cit
RW-4 143;259.89 cit
RW-5 193,111.75 cit
RW-6 175,194.80 cit
RW-7 236,109.01 cit
RW-8 442,026.64 cit
RW-9 78,345.10 cit
RW-10 125,444.82 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
35.52 Point
39.10 SF-1
37.66 SF-1
45.48 SF-2
53.25 SF-2
51.86
53.38
53.43
59.77
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 20
Effluent 20
Influent 19
Effluent 18
59.45 Any leaks observed: No -------=------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 1/9/02
Jill Lemacks
Was the system ronning upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 353,832.01 cit
RW-1 415,823.34 cit
RW-2 115,503.70 cit
RW-3 67,560.21 cit
RW-4 144,028.23 cit
RW-5 195,108.52 cit
RW-6 176,121.84 cit
RW-7 237,260.42 cit
RW-8 NM cit
RW-9 78,945.97 cit
RW-10 126,134.61 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
35.39 Point
39.14 SF-1
37.38 SF-1
46.61 SF-2
53.74 SF-2
56.56
56.40
NM
59.85
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 21
Effluent 20
Influent 18
Effluent 17
55.97 Any leaks observed: No -----------
I
I
I
I
I ,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 1/14/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 360,960.25 cf t
RW-1 415,837.85 cft
RW-2 121,449.01 cft
RW-3 67,577.01 cft
RW-4 144,784.70 cft
RW-5 195,696.50 cft
RW-6 177,020.35 cft
RW-7 238,386.70 cft
RW-8 447,214.00 cft
'RW-9 79,176.50 cft
RW-10 126,781.25 cft
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings --While TP #2 is running.
35.46 Point Pressure (PSI) 39.40 SF-1 Influent 21 37.57 SF-1 Effluent 20 50.95 SF-2 Influent 19 53.85 SF-2 Effluent 18 53.87
56.82
53.60
59.83
59.37 Any leaks observed: No -----------
I
I
I
I
I ,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
February 4, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5405 Metric Place -Suite 200
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
·rrs o 7 20trl
B~ l?:>3-'},f DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBER., · • • 0 ' '""'~ A\-'-.S\
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Forms
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed are the FCX System Check Forms for January 25th and January 29'\
2002. Any repair work performed during this time period is described in detail on the
System Check Forms.
The pump manufacturer stated they have only one loaner pump to send to me at
this time. I am expecting the pump this week. As soon as I get the pump I will visit the
site to remove one for service.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely;
~~~,~
Brad Burdick
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite ll • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • fax: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
•·
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 1/25/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 377,349.25 cft
RW-1 415,858.25 cft
RW-2 133,999.05 cft
RW-3 67,630.00 cft
RW-4 146,483.38 cft
RW-5 198,545.00 cft
RW-6 179,115.32 cft
RW-7 240,884.30 cft
RW-8 452,836.50 cft
RW-9 80,093.35 cft
RW-10 128,189.13 cft
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
4.0
Yes
Nonroutine Hours
6.0
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
-While TP #2 is running.
35.40 Point Pressure (PSI)
53.44 . SF-1 Influent 22
37.38 SF-1 Effluent 21
48.35 SF-2 Influent 20
51.60 SF-2 Effluent 19
55.82
56.00
53.85
59.60
58.05 Any leaks observed: No ------------
The pump for RW-2 appeared to be running continuously because the effluent meter was
constantly spinning. Upon opening the sample port at the pump effluent it was noticed that
there was some water being pumped, but it was mostly air coming through the line. The pump was
pulled and inspected for any damages, leaks, etc. There were no leaks or visible damage
on the pump. The pump was replaced and then the regulator for the pump was drained to bleed
out any excess water. RW-2 appeared to be cycling normal now.
After checking the flow readings for RW-1 and RW-3, they appeared to not be pumping
much water. Both pumps were pulled and disassembled to look for any visible damage or scaling.
Both pumps looked fine and they both were receiving the proper amount of air through the regulator.
Next both regulators were bled to remove any excess water in the air lines. This still did not appear
to cause either pump to function normally. After speaking with Ken Still ( a technical rep for the pump
mfr.) he stated that due to the age and usage of the pumps, they probably are in need of service.
He also said that they could service the pumps and provide a loaner rental while the pumps were
being serviced. One replacement pump should be arriving on Februa,y 6th.
(cont. on next page)
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Pond Water Removal
After traveling to 3 stores, there appeared to be no pump available that could perform the pumping job required to empty the retaining pond. An industrial size trash pump was then rented from a local rental facility. The remaining time on-site was spent pumping out the retention pond.
The system was working fine upon site departure.
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 1/29/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 383,736.98 cit
RW-1 415,889.00 cit
RW-2 134,691.50 cit
RW-3 67,667.20 cit
RW-4 147,206.92 cit
RW-5 199,647.20 cit
RW-6 179,994.65 cit
RW-7 241,879.90 cit
RW-8 455,048.12 cit
RW-9 80,463.15 cit
RW-10 128,791.15 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
-While TP #2 is running. . Point Pressure (PSI)
• SF-1 Influent 20 . SF-1 Effluent 19 • SF-2 Influent 18
• SF-2 Effluent 17 •
• . .
• Any leaks observed: No -----------
*Water levels were not recorded during this visit due to a malfunction in the water level indicator
during the weekly site visit.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FEB 19 2002
Date: 2-6-02
To: Joe Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
From: Brad Burdick
Staff Scientist
CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL
FCX -ST A TESVILLE
AES PROJECT NO. 153-92001-02
SUBCONTRACT AGREEMENT NO. 0012435
Phone:
Fax:
Phone:
Fax: Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
Comments/Recommended Actions:
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
The following memo describes the out-of-scope activities conducted for the diagnosis and repair of the groundwater pump and treat system at the FCX facility. Specifically, this change order is for the additional time and materials used to drain the retention pond outside of the equipment compound. The attached costs is inclusive of project management time to purchase and pick-up the associated supplies and rental equipment. If you have any questions regarding the additional costs, please do not hesitate to contact me at the number above. I have included with this change order a description of the additional field activities associated with the repairs and I have also attached any receipts of items purchased or rented.
January 25, 2002
Travel to pick-up supplies
and rental equipment:
Drain retention pond
Rental of Industrial Trash Pump:
Purchase of Garden Hose: ,f.
Proposal Accepted:
Sincerely,
APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES, INC.
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
2.0 hours @ 65/hour
4.0 hours @ 65/hour
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
Total:
$130.00
$260.00
$50.59
$16.78
$457.37
Date
I
I
I
I
I
I
STATESVILLE
RENTAL
905 Garner Bagnal Blvd.
Slalesvllle, NC 28677
[phone] /J'J,q11.o.,,vCt-1tV'/ ?u n .. ., ... ~--x
·-GOWE. "':S .. (7114)878-'!448
-SAl.£-
RENTAL
SAI.ES I: S8458JV1 17934 81-25-112
92359 FAIRUIWH 5/8 X 5 2 @ 7.88
SUBTOTAi.: TAX 38192 : IH'IOIC£ 24518 TOTAi.:
15.n
15. 76 1.112
16. 78
BPJJlltCEIIUE:~--
AIIEX:~
MEX XXIDXXXXXXX1888 8383 515164 AIUllJIT: .16.78
8458 Tml!HAI.: 24 81/25/112 11:81:34
THllHX rDII B BURDICK
FOIi SIIOPPIH6 LOW(' S
REC£IPT REllUIREO FOR CASH REFUND. CHECK PURCHASE REFIJWS REOUIRE 15 oor WAIT PERIOD FOR CASH BAO(. STORE "GR: DALE YOUHGER
WE HAVE TH£ LOWEST PRICESi GUAAAHTEEO' IF rou FINO A LINER Pf<IL[ W[ Will ' BEAT IT Br 10%. SEE STORE FOR DETAILS.
ADVANCE
RENTAL
CHARGE
ADDITIONAL
CHARGE REFUND
CONTRACT NO. 6 8131
'{] HOMEOWNER
RENTED
OUT I I ':\... j ·.:-.\. ,,;,. . 0 CONTRACTOR
7 ,; /.'-' DUE ► -5 I''{ , ..
~OMMERCIAL , -··.
RETURNED
JOO NO P.O.NO.
CHARGE ADVANCE FINAL
RENTAL
CHARGE
DESCRIPTION CHARGES
,_..I·
RENT -'-f.. / !) J
SUB
TOTAL
SALES
TAX
·sue
TI>TAL
,. :.,,CC
AOOITIONAL
CHARGES
,;.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 1/25/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 377,349.25 cit
RW-1 415,858.25 cit
RW-2 133,999.05 cit
RW-3 67,630.00 cit
RW-4 146,483.38 cit
RW-5 198,545.00 cit
RW-6 179,115.32 cit
RW-7 240,884.30 cit
RW-8 452,836.50 cit
RW-9 80,093.35 cit
RW-10 128,189.13 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
4.0
Yes
Nonroutine Hours
6.0
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
-While TP #2 is running.
35.40 Point Pressure (PSI)
53.44 SF-1 Influent 22
37.38 SF-1 Effluent 21
48.35 SF-2 Influent 20
51.60 SF-2 Effluent 19
55.82
56.00
53.85
59.60
58.05 Any leaks observed: No ------------
The pump for RW-2 appeared to be running continuously because the effluent meter was
constantly spinning. Upon opening the sample port at the pump effluent it was noticed that
there was some water being pumped, but it was mostly air coming through the line. The pump was
pulled and inspected for any damages, leaks, etc. There were no leaks or visible damage
on the pump. The pump was replaced and then the regulator for the pump was drained to bleed
out any excess water. RW-2 appeared to be cycling normal now.
After checking the flow readings for RW-1 and RW-3, they appeared to not be pumping
much water. Both pumps were pulled and disassembled to look for any visible damage or scaling.
Both pumps looked fine and they both were receiving the proper amount of air through the regulator.
Nex1 both regulators were bled to remove any excess water in the air lines. This still did not appear
to cause either pump to function normally. After speaking with Ken Still ( a technical rep for the pump
mfr.) he stated that due to the age and usage of the pumps, they probably are in need of service.
He also said that they could service the pumps and provide a loaner rental while the pumps were
being serviced. One replacement pump should be arriving on February 6th.
(cont. on next page)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
pond Water Removal
After traveling to 3 stores, there appeared to be no pump available that could perform the pumping
job required to empty the retaining pond. An industrial size trash pump was then rented
from a local rental facility. The remaining time on-site was spent pumping out the
retention pond.
The system was working fine upon site departure.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
February 12, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5405 Metric Place -Suite 200
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
fEB 1 9 20112
DOCUMENT CONTROL NUM&J( RR,.i IT3 ~::, 1
A1<.5J
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Forms
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed is the FCX System Check Form for February 8th , 2002. Any repair
work performed during this time period is described in detail on the System Check Form.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Brad Burdick
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • Fox: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 2/8/02
Amy Icenhour
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 398,592.75 cit
RW-1 · 416,113.00 cit
RW-2 136,339.60 cit
RW-3 67,829.29 cit
RW-4 148,917.37 cit
RW-5 202,140.41 cit
RW-6 182,019.62 cit
RW-7 244,187.40 cit
RW-8 --cit
RW-9 81,247.54 cit
RW-10 130,057.12 cit
Describe reoairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
--
35.2 Point
57.27 SF-1
37.48 SF-1
44.65 SF-2
56.56 SF-2
53.1
55.5
-
59.6
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 20
Effluent 20
Influent 20
Effluent 20
55.85 Any leaks observed: No -----------
No repair work.was conducted, however the regulators for RW-1 and RW-6 are going to have to be
replaced soon. They are leaking a small amount of air right now which may be an indication of a futur
problem with the regulators.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
February 18, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5405 Metric Place -Suite 200
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Forms
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed is the FCX System Check Form for February 14th , 2002. Any repair
work performed during this time period is described in detail on the System Check Form.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
~~
Brad Burdick
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • fax: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 2/14/02
Brad Burdick
Steve lrrninqer
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readinas:
Effluent 407,037.00 cit
RW-1 416,240.08 cit
RW-2 137,163.53 cit
RW-3 67,933.85 cit
RW-4 149,898.73 cit
RW-5 203,518.78 cit
RW-6 183 219.32 cit
RW-7 245,532.25 cit
RW-8 463,069.75 cit
RW-9 81,769.25 cit
RW-10 130,834.00 cit
Describe repairs conducted:
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
35.4 Point
57.46 SF-1
37.8 SF-1
45.7 SF-2
56.65 SF-2
53.56
53.5
53.55
59.64
Nonroutine Hours
4.5
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Fitter Readinas
While TP #2 is runnlna.
Pressure IPSll
Influent 22
Effluent 22
Influent 20
Effluent 20
60.99 Any leaks observed: ____ __:N..:;o:_ ___ _
Removed pump from RW-3 and installed the loaner pump in RW-3. Turned pump back on and ij
was pumping well. Removed old regulator from RW-2 and installed a new regulator for RW-2.
Turned RW-3 back on and there was no leaks observed from the new regulator.
Returned to office and shipped the pump for RW-3 lo the manufacturer to be serviced.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
March 4, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5405 Metric Place -Suite 200
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
HAR O 8 2002
DOCUMENT CONTROL NUt.WER RfW f:?3-31
. -AktL ="'
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Forms
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed is the FCX System Check Form for February 22, 2002 and March I,
200 I. Any repair work performed during this time period is described in detail on the
System Check Form.
I am expecting the serviced pump to be here on Wednesday March 6, 2002. As
soon as it arrives I will remove the other pump for RW-1 to be serviced.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely; _ _✓,;, //'L.-.,,.., ~~
Brad Burdick
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • Fox: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 2/22/02
Amy Icenhour
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 419,973.00 cit RW-1 416,424.41 cit
RW-2 138,096.48 cit
RW-3 69,495.90 cit
RW-4 151,258.42 cit
RW-5 205,430.37 cit RW-6 184,894.88 cit RW-7 247,422.80 cit
RW-8 NS cit
RW-9 82,394.50 cit
RW-10 131,865.03 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
34.85 Point
34.97 SF-1 60.75 SF-1 46.76 SF-2
56.6 SF-2 55.9
56.35
NS
59.55
58.38 Any leaks observed:
MAR O 8 2lll12
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 18
Effluent 18
Influent 19
Effluent 19
No
I drained the water out of the air regulators in the following wells: RW-1, -2, 3, 4, 5, 7, & 9.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 3/1/02
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
MAR O 8 20112
Routine Hours Nonroutine Hours Amy Icenhour 3.0
.
Was the system running upon arrival: Yes upon leaving: Yes
Flow Meter Readings: Sand Filter Readings Effluent 429,993.18 cft -While TP #2 is running. RW-1 416,597.85 cf! 33.8 Point Pressure (PSI) RW-2 138,235.77 cft 35.7 SF-1 Influent RW-3 70,725.77 cft 60.9 SF-1 Effluent RW-4 152,443.47 cft 45.2 SF-2 Influent RW-5 207,031.75 cf! 56.75 SF-2 Effluent RW-6 186,304.25 cf! 53.3 RW-7 249,049.14 cf! 51.35
RW-8 NS cft NS
RW-9 82,936.12 cf! 59.6 RW-10 132,725.36 cf! 60.35 Any leaks observed: No
Describe repairs conducted·
I drained the water out of the air regulators in the following wells: RW-1, 2, 3, 5, 7, & 9. I was unable to close the air regulator valves on RW-1 and RW-3. This produced a slow hiss of air. These regulators have most likely gone bad. They will be replaced as soon as new regulators are ordered.
16
18
18
19
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
March 12, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5405 Metric Place -Suite 200
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
ffW13")-3,4-DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBER ~ a~
A-\<}!(Q
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Forms
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed is the FCX System Check Form for March 81h and March I 2'h, 2002.
Any repair work performed during this time period is described in detail on the System
Check Form.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
s~~
Brad Burdick
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • Fax: [phone]~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.. NV'l lUJ:"NT CONTROLNUNRfR A-K )('~ SYSTEMeRECK'FORm -,-_---
Date: 3/8/02
Amy Icenhour
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 439,887.00 cft
RW-1 416,034.12 cft
RW-2 138,303.14 cft
RW-3 71,927.45 cft
RW-4 153,639.35 cft
RW-5 208,619.36 cft
RW-6 187,709.10 cft
RW-7 250,653.15 cft
RW-8 NS cft
RW-9 83,514.34 cft
RW-10 133,635.40 cft
Describe repairs conducted·
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
33.85 Point
35.38 SF-1
60.90 SF-1
47.90 SF-2
55.25 SF-2
53.90
55.00
NS
59.55
60.05 Any leaks observed:
Nonrouline Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings _
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 17
Effluent 18
Influent 18
Effluent 19
No
We are still waiting on the serviced pump to be delivered. Once it is delivered we will proceed with the replacement and servicing of the pump from RW-1. Also, the meter reading from RW-1 has a lower number reading from the previous week. I believed the meter for RW-1 is spinning backwards from effluent water tt is receiving from RW-2 and RW-3. This is most likely because a check valve in the pump for RW-1 has gone bad. This problem should be eliminated when RW-1 · is serviced and replaced.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DOCUMENT CONTROL HUMBER. AKiG ;,a''-,
Date· 3/12/02
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. F rant Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours Nonroutine Hours
Brad Burdick 3.0 4.5
Amy Icenhour
Was the system running upon arrival: Yes upon leaving: Yes
Flow Meter Readings: Sand Filter Readings
Effluent 445,298.17 cit -While TP #2 is running.
RW-1 415,916.30 cit 33.85 Point Pressure (PSI)
RW-2 138,333.72 cit 35.45 SF-1 Influent
RW-3 72,548.40 cit 60.55 SF-1 Effluent
RW-4 154,270.35 cit 50.00 SF-2 . Influent
RW-5 209,436.02 cit 54.43 SF-2 Effluent
RW-<'i 188,437.95 cit 52.96
RW-7 251,506.90 cit 52.20
RW-8 476,118.02 cit 54.20
RW-9 83,806.90 cit 59.75
RW-10 134,088.72 cit 62.10 Any leaks observed: No
Describe repairs conducted·
Arrived on site and took weekly readings first. RW-2 was not pumping properly, so it was removed
for inspection. The inspection did not reveal any noticeable damage or non-functioning parts.
The pump was replaced in to the well. Upon placing the pump back into the well it began pumping
properly. After returning two hours. later the pump was still pumping as designed. The pump for RW-2
may be in need of servicing like pumps.RW-1 and RW-3. It is recommended that it be serviced soon.
Next, the pump from RW-1 was removed io replace with the serviced pump from Clean Environment
Equipment. While replacing the pump the barb fitting for the air line cracked. I Traveled to the nearest
hardware store to find a new fitting. Once the fitting was replaced, the pump was placed back in to the
well. Also, a new regulator for RW-1 was installed. RW-1 was then turned back on and the pump was
functioning as designed. Finally, the oil was changed in the air compressor.
21
20
19
18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
March 26, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5405 Metric Place -Suite 200
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Forms
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed are the FCX System Check Forms for March I 8th and March 25th , 2002.
Any repair work performed during this time period is described in detail on the System
Check Form.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely;
Brad Burdick
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • fax: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 3/18/02
Amy Icenhour
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 460,017.04 cit
RW-1 421,352.75 cit
RW-2 139,472.27 cit
RW-3 73,566.95 cit
RW-4 155,260.56 cit
RW-5 210,839.04 cit
RW-6 189,732.65 cit
RW-7 252,993.24 cit
RW-8 ns cit
RW-9 84,372.00 cit
RVv-10 134,921.52 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
.AKXP
DOCUMENTCONTROLNUMBERr__~~~~~-.
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
49.84 Point
56.10 SF-1
60.30 SF-1
46.46 SF-2
56.65 SF-2
55.50
53.70
ns
59.60
55.25 Any leaks observed:
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 16
Effluent 17
Influent 17
Effluent 18
No
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 3/25/02
I
!Amy Icenhour
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 474,570.90 cit
RW-1 426,470.00 cit
RW-2 140,323.27 cit
RW-3 74,548.68 cit
RW-4 156,197.75 cit
RW-5 212,221.50 cit
RW-6 191,059.28 cit
RW-7 254,543.33 cit
RW-8 NS cit
RW-9 84,963.00 cit
RW-10 135,800.95 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
. .. . ·1·0N gil,jW)~-Af_il,;...;;.s..; SYSTEM ct-rt:Ci~¥\'Jif~T CON o\h --_·. .
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
57.76 Point 57.50 SF-1
60.35 SF-1 49.45 SF-2 55.70 SF-2
54.30
56.90
NS
59.65
58.60 Any leaks observed:
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 15
Effluent 15
Influent 14
Effluent 14
No
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL
FCX -STATESVILLE
AES PROJECT NO. 153-92001-02
SUBCONTRACT AGREEMENT NO. 0012435
Date: 3/26/02
To: Joe Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
From: Brad Burdick
Staff Scientist
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
Comments/Recommended Actions:
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
The following memo is a recommendation for the FCX-Statesville site. Due to the down time associated with the
repair and maintenance of the pumps for RW-1 and RW-3, AES is providing the following recommendation. AES
will purchase the remanufactured AP-4 pump from Clean Environment Equipment. This pump will remain on-site
in case of any future pump failure. This pump can also be used to replace existing pumps that may be in need of
servicing.
Project Management
Purchase of AP-4 Pump
AES Markup:
Proposal Accepted:
1.0 hours@ 65/hour
Lump Sum
10% mark-up
Total:
Roy. F. Weston, Inc.
Sincerely,
APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES, INC.
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
$65.00
$1,447.50
$144.75
$1,657.25
Date
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL #4
FCX -ST A TESVILLE
AES PROJECT NO. 153-12001-02
SUBCONTRACT AGREEMENT NO. 0012435
Date: 3/27 /02
To: Joe Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
From: Brad Burdick
Staff Scientist
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
Comments/Recommended Actions:
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
The following details the costs associated with out-of-scope work, requested by you, for the FCX site. On 3(25/02
and 3(26/02 AES personnel collected the data you requested for the pump efficiency test. AES traveled to the site
to on 3(25/02 to collect the weekly groundwater data for the site, along with the groundwater level readings for
monitoring wells MW-I, MW-2, MW-3, MW-5S, MW-6S, MW-7, MW-10 and MW-27S. After these readings
were collected, the pump-and-treat-system was turned off at approximately 11 :38 AM. On 3(26/02 AES again
mobilized to the site to continue the test. Groundwater levels were measured from all the recovery wells and from
the above-listed monitoring wells. The system was then turned back on at approximately 11 :00 AM on 3(26/02. A
three (3) hour time period elapsed before AES recorded the final groundwater readings from the monitoring and
recovery wells. During the pump test it was also noted that a number of the monitoring wells were in need of new
padlocks. Some of the pad locks were either damaged or rusted to the point that they could no longer be used. The
costs below also reflect the price of replacing these locks.
Project Management:
Padlock Replacement (MW-I, MW-2,
MW-3, MW-5S, MW-6S, MW-7
And MW-10):
3/25/02
Collect Groundwater Data from
Monitoring Wells:
3 .0 hours @ 65/hour $195.00
Lump Sum $45.00
.50 hours @ 65/hour $32.50
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
October 2, 200 I
Page 2
3/26/02
Travel To/From Site:
Collect Data from Monitoring
And Recovery Wells:
Travel to Store for Padlocks
Truck Mileage
Proposal Accepted:
Sincerely,
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
2.0 hours@ 65/hour
5.0 hours@ 65/hour
1.0 hour@ 65/hour
130 miles@ .40/mile
Total:
Roy. F. Weston, Inc.
$130.00
$325.00
$65.00
$52.00
$ 844.50
Y/2.slo1-
Date
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
April 8, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5405 Metric Place -Suite 200
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
Re: FCX Change Orders
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed are the weekly system check forms for the FCX-Statesville Site. These
forms cover the weeks of March 25 th and April 2nd, 2002. Any work performed during
the weekly visit is explained in detail on the system check form.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely;
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • Fox: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 3/25/02
I
!Amy Icenhour
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 474,570.90 cft
RW-1 426,470.00 cft
RW-2 140,323.27 cft
RW-3 74,548.68 cft
RW-4 156,197.75 cft
RW-5 212,221.50 cft
RW-6 191,059.28 cft
RW-7 254,543.33 cft
RW-8 NS cft
RW-9 84,963.00 cft
RW-10 135,800.95 cft
Describe repairs cqnducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
----
57.76 Point
57.50 SF-1
60.35 SF-1
49.45 SF-2
55.70 SF-2
54.30
56.90
NS
59.65
58.60 Any leaks observed:
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure {PSI)
Influent 15
Effluent 15
Influent 14
Effluent 14
No
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 412/02
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours Nonroutine Hours
Brad Burdick 3.0 4.0
Was the system running upon arrival: No upon leaving: Yes
Flow Meter Readings: Sand Filter Readings
Effluent 488,939.50 cft ·-While TP #2 is running.
RW-1 431,250.53 cft 46.45 Point Pressure (PSI)
RW-2 141,140.65 cft 57.45 SF-1 Influent 24
RW-3 75,589.35 cft 60.70 SF-1 Effluent 24
RW-4 157,044.00 cft 51.00 SF-2 Influent 22
RW-5 213,552.10 cft 52.70 SF-2 Effluent 22
RW-6 192,311.25 cft 55.70
RW-7 256,069.92 cft 57.10
RW-8 485,863.52 cft 53.15 /58.98-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
RW-9 85,522.87 cft 59.55
RW-10 136,644.15 cft 56.60 Any leaks observed: No
Describe repairs conducted·
During the site visit it was observed that the main air feed line from the compressor had burst. It appears
that the pipe had burst as a result of temperature changes over an extended period of time.
An.inventory.o_f the plumbing part necessary for the repair was taken and then AES personell traveled off-site
lei pick up the needed parts. The plumbing above ground could not be adapted to due to the fact that it was
swollen too large to union the PVC to. Therefore, the plumbing below ground had to be dug up to locate
a section of pipe in which to adapt the new plumbing too. After digging approximately two feet outside the
remediation shed a section of pipe was found that could be used and the new plumbing was installed.
A 30 minute time period was allowed to elapse to insure the plumbing was dry and ready for use. The
system was then turned back on and monitored. Everything appeared to be in working order and there
were no air leaks noticed in the new section of plumbing. The plumbing was then once again buried.
Also, a new section of plumbing was added to RW-8. Since RW-8 in in a confined space, groundwater
readings have not been collected lately. A section of pipe 5.80 ft. long was added so that these readings
could once again be collected during the weekly site visits. After this work was done the weekly readings
were collected.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
April 22, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5405 Metric Place -Suite 200
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
Re: FCX Change Orders
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
DOCUMOOCOHTROl.MUMBER"R~W t~3 -3t"
A~-:z.y
Enclosed are the weekly system check forms for the FCX-Statesville Site. These
forms cover the weeks of April 12th and April 15th , 2002. Any work performed during
the weekly visit is explained in detail on the system check form.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely;
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E .. Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone]S • Fax: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 4115102
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 512,775.56 cit
RW-1 439,145.82 cit
RW-2 142,375.53 cit
RW-3 77,304.40 cit
RW-4 158,419.13 cit
RW-5 215,959.80 cit
RW-6 196,724.20 cit
RW-7 258,623.92 cit
RW-8 491,562.35 cit
RW-9 86,425.59 cit
RW-10 138,062.35 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
No
-
45.00 Point
57.22 SF-1
60.13 SF-1
50.92 SF-2
56.55 SF-2
54.86
55.74
Nonroutine Hours
3.0
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 20
Effluent 20
Influent 19
Effluent 19
52.35 (58.15-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 fl.
59.72
61.42 Any leaks observed: No
Arrived on site and the air compressor was not running. The breaker had been tripped. Reset the breaker
and then the air compressor started up. After restarting the system the loaner pump from RW-3 was
removed and replace with the newly service pump from Clean Environment Equipment During the reading
of RW-6 ii was observed that the effluent meter was spinning constantly. This was due to an air leakage in
the recovery pump. The pump for RW-6 was not pumping water like it should. The pump was removed and
examined. No visible damage was noticed, however ii was determined that the air line check valve in the
pump was in need of replacement. The pump was removed and the loaner pump was installed in its place.
The loaner pump was then pumping as designed. The pump for RW-6 was then shipped to Clean
Environment Equipment for servicing.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 4/12102
Brad Burdick
Was the system ronning upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 510,756.83 cf\
RW-1 438,504.35 cfl
RW-2 142,250.18 cf\
RW-3 77,157.38 cfl
RW-4 158,299.78 cf\
RW-5 215,742.10 cf\
RW-6 194,213.87 cfl
RW-7 258,392.40 cf\
RW-8 491,066.53 cf\
RW-9 86,347.20 cfl
RW-10 137,938.50 cf\
Describe repairs conducted·
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
Yes
-
58.25 Point
58.00 SF-1
60.40 SF-1
46.40 SF-2
56.77 SF-2
54.21
51.33
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: Yes
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent 20
Effluent 20
Influent 19
Effluent 19
51.28 /57.18-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
59.72
58.35 Any leaks observed: No
IApr-25-02 ll:14A Applied Earth Sciences 704 795-7076
I
I
I
I
DOCUMENT CONTROL NUW;)i;.t( Qh,'J 1'3 '3-34
A'KZX
CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL 116
FCX -ST AT ES VILLI!
AES PROJECT NO. 153-92001-02
SUBCONTRACT AGREEMENT NO. 0012435
I Date, 4/25/02
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
To: Joe Ferentz
Roy F. We,ton, Inc.
From: Brad Burdick
Staff Scientist
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
Comments/Recommended Action,:
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Phone: (770} 263-5452
Fax: (770} 263-5450
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
During the Semi-Annual Sampling event of April 23-24, 2002, the pump-and-treat system was not running due to a
malfunction of the air compressor. AES contacted Ingersoll-Rand. the manufacrurer, to send out a field technician
lo troubleshoot the problem. After approximately two hours, it was determined that the motor on the compressor
had gone bad and ground faulted. This ground fault created a power surge which also damaged the air compressor
contact in the control panel. Both the motor and the contact will both need to be replaced in order to re-start the
system. The following details the work scope necessary to replace these components.
According to Ingersoll Rand the new motor weighs approximately 350-400 pounds. As a result this will require
some ne.cessary preparation and additional equipment to complete the work. Removing this motor through the
doors of the shed will not be possible due to the weight and space constriction, therefore a section oflhe building
will have to be disassembled in order to reach the motor_ After this section is removed. AES intends to have a smal1
crane on si1e. This crane will be used to remove the old motor and set the new one in place. Once the motor is in
place a technician from Ingersoll Rand will install the new motor. After the motor is installed a certified electrician
will replace the contacts in the control panel and check all the wiring before turning the system on. The electrician
will also check the PLC to ensure it is operating properly. The following is an estimation of the cost breakdown for
this projecl Any unexpected additional costs incum:d during this project will be submitted under a separate
proposal letter.
Project Management (sub-contractor
Bidding and coordination,
Parts tracking elc. }
Equipment and Materials
Explosion Proof Motor
Motor Starter Contact
Crane Rental
4 .0 hours @ 65/hour
Lump Sum
Lump Sum
4.0 hours@ 85/hour
$260.00
$1,200.00
$275.00
$340.00
P.02
I Apr-25-02 Il:14A Applied Earth Sciences 704 795-7076
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
October 2, 200 I
Page 2
Electrician/PLC Programmer
Ingersoll Rand Technician
A ES Personnel
Proposal Accepted:
Sincerely,
APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES, INC.
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
8 hours@ 120/hour
8 hours @ 65/hour
IO hours @ 65/hour
Total:
$960.00
$520.00
$650.00
$4,205.00
Date
P.03
I Apr-25-02 OB:39A Applied Earth Sciences 704 795-7076
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
UY~RR,J l?,1.-::3A oocuMENT coNTROL N A I< iv' ,,
CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL #4
FCX • STATESVILLE
AES PROJECT NO. 153-12001-02
SUBCONTRACT AGREEMENT NO. 0012435
Date: 4/25/02
To: Joe Ferentz
Roy F. Weslon, In<.
From: Brad Burdick
Staff Scientist
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
Comment,/Recommended Actions:
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Phone: [phone]
Fax: (770) l63-S4SO
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
The following details the costs associated wilh out-of-scope work, requested by you, for the FCX site. On 3/25/02 and J/26/02 AES personnel collecled lhc data you requested for the pump efficiency test. A ES traveled to the site to on 3/25/02 to collect the weekly groundwater data for the site. along with the groundwater level readings for monitoring wells MW-I. MW-2, MW-3. MW-5S, MW-6S, MW-7, MW-IO and MW-27S. After these readings were collected, the pump-and-treat-system was turned offal approximately I I :38 AM. On 3/26/02 AES again mobilized to the site to continue the test Groundwater levels were measured from all the recovery wells and from the above-listed monitoring wells. The system was then turned back on al approximately I I :00 AM on 3/26/02. A three (3) hour time period elapsed before AES recorded lhc final groundwater readings ti-om the monitoring and recovery wells. During ihe pump test it was also noted that a number of the monitoring wells were in need of new padlocks. Some of the pad locks were either damaged or rusted to lhe point that they could no longer be used. The _costs below also reflect the price of replacing these locks.
Project Management:
Padlock Replacement (MW-I, MW-2,
MW-3, MW-5S, MW-6S, MW-7
And MW-JO):
3125/0l
Collect Groundwater Data from
Monitoring Wells:
3.0 hours@ 65/hour $195.00
Lump Sum $45.00
.50 hours @ 65/hour $32.50
P.02
I Apr-25-02 08:39A Applied Earth Sciences
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
October 2, 200 I
Page2
3/26/02
Travel To/From Site:
Collect Data from Monitoring
And Recovery Wells:
Travel to Store for Padlocks
2.0 hours@ 65/hour
5.0 hours@ 65/hour
1.0 hour@ 65/hour
704 795-7076
$130.00
$325.00
$65.00
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Total: S 792.50
I
Proposal Accepted:
Roy. F. Weslon. Inc.
Sincerely,
APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES, INC.
Brad Burdick
Projec-t Scientist
f?.goz_
Date
P.03
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
May 8, 2002
Mr. Joseph Ferentz
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
5405 Metric Place -Suite 200
Norcross, Georgia 30092-2550
-R.~(33-"34-DOCUMENT CONTROL NlJMl;,1,t:W 1
_ . _ ? "'l"' Au=.--J
Re: FCX Weekly System Check Forms
Dear Mr. Ferentz;
Enclosed are the weekly system check forms for the FCX-Statesville Site. These
forms cover the dates; April 23rd, May I st and May 71\ 2002 Any work performed during
the weekly visit is explained in detail on the system check form.
If you have any questions please feel free to call 704-795-7075 at any time.
Sincerely;
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
/~~
Brad Burdick
Project Scientist
I 434 Copperfield Blvd. N.E., Suite B • Concord, North Carolina 28025 • Tel: [phone] • Fox: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date· 4/23/02
Brad Burdick
Was the system running upon arrival:
Flow Meter Readings:
Effluent 522,247.40 cit
RW-1 442,036.27 cit
RW-2 142,825.75 cit
RW-3 77,962.77 cit
RW-4 158,958.15 cit
RW-5 216,906.60 cit
RW-6 197,568.87 cit
RW-7 259,571.56 cit
RW-8 493,760.27 cit
RW-9 86,783.02 cit
RW-10 138,637.02 cit
Describe repairs conducted·
--
SYSTEM CHECK FORM
FCX
1620 W. Front Street
Statesville, North Carolina
Routine Hours
3.0
No
37.33 Point
36.99 SF-1
39.50 SF-1
36.65 SF-2
40.35 SF-2
42.10
41.18
Nonroutine Hours
upon leaving: No
Sand Filter Readings
While TP #2 is running.
Pressure (PSI)
Influent --
Effluent -
Influent --
Effluent -
40.87 (46.67-5.80) New pipe extension is 5.80 ft.
46.53
44.57 Any leaks observed: No
Upon arrival for the semi-annual sampling event the compressor was not running. The breaker had been
tripped. The breaker was reset and the system was re-started. The compressor ran for about 5 minutes
before the breaker tripped again. Ingersoll Rand was called to come out and troubleshoot the compressor.
The Ingersoll Rand technician determined that the compressormotor had gone bad. The motor had
also ground faulted which created a failure of the compressor contactor in the control panel.
The faulty motor was an explosion proof type which would have to be special ordered. Also, an electrician
would have to be called to replace the contact and diagnose the control panel to make sure there were no
other problems.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIXC
PURGE FORMS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBER P..fW r~·1-;>1)-AL-i!.Q·
FUlng Information
Job No.
Job File ----::F,-ield:--:-:Fi::-le-11
Punch No Punch
Description: FCX
Fluid Level Measurements
No. 150-92002--01
---------------,------------
Well Ga&iAS Time Depth Depth Product Corrected Comments
Ele•,·etion To To Thickness Ground Water
TtJTl/lDEl'I Product Water Elevation
MW-1 Ul ,:S( ) IY'f, z.,4
MW-2 if ,, I/"\ l/l/.~7
MW-3 1:Jd ,( :H, /fn
MW-4 ?5,0 .. LI l/,25
MW-5D >IOit . s 'l,
MW-5S ·, " /,· I '. .
~D •/{, Ill'• '• }•
MW-6S IZJl8,0n / •
MW-7 ~~.rn I~ ,c ) .,
MW-8 '?I/ .oo ~ ,. ,o ' MW-9 15,50 ~ ,,,5'
MW-10 qr){) I -J
MW-11 "I ,ctu 7,-..
W-22S· ~
W-23 2tJ.7S t..:Jo, .5 ~
W-24S l/5.~Jt-8. '7 C:,J!L
W-255 2S,d /?.Id -,· ..
W-27S 1..0.so 33,0/. , , • ,
W-29I c;,y,o 2-oo
RW-1 3·1, ;-'.'.:< t/42,Cf2.ln,27
RW-2 ;") 0 I' r< Ll;,.c,/,•~-::J'S"7S
RW-3 3 ,c;(\ p7· · I I, v (g'Z.,77
RW-4 '"> '• rE::, l'5 [j, \ 'o~,I <...,
RW-5 '? z 0, ( I/?,{~
RW-6 l ' !U l I._ ,n } _p,-
RW-7 {.. • ,IQ 9 .5, /,er_ zc.
RW-8 -
RW-9 I ~-r 1--J'j ,. 7fJ3.CJl
RW-10 I ,.j Ji In~-,02.
. ... • I /P = -J.·tJo
,.,;-.n __. -? J' I .,(""
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
Site:
Well ID:
Water Level Indicator:
pH/fempcrature Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of wcU:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
ll/ :,--' I/
,J 3:3'7f/11
3'.~00
~;Cfflrn
Form reviewed by:
2 ,,
Water
Level
I
Purge
Well Purging Record
FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
UJLLf CIT:D SR-fTlf{£ lt-T
4.'20Prn
Volume ~Comments(Clarity, color, odor)
Removed
0
o,'10 .~.n r; Z0,3 qc ")
I.BO o. I -::7 -z_j,fJ'J (, 'V 'J
7,/n~ n. 7 -Jii.~ l °J()
•
'
-.
Date:
Page 1
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sile:
Well ID:
Water Level Indicator:
pH/rempcrarure Meler:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Waler column:
Date Time
~2
Form reviewed by:
Water
Level
Purge
Well Purging Record
-FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
to!kl~~
J jfl;D'J
Volume ~Comm~"'Cl•i,y, ,a~.-)
Removed
0
:i~ •? Q(k) // L J L • I, S ,~5 Ir ;:;., ? L/eJ"J ?" -/4, .s-./'~,L·
:J. 1 £..> /7 /Y,/ -<Jrp J ,__;t.l.
.·/:
·. JS }.,( .. · . ' : .·-•·· · . . .
:.·, . '.! :,i."::. :; . : .
; <•, ' ~ · .. . -..
.
. · . . ·.
Date:
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site: FCX
Well ID: fill{; ~ 3
Water Level Indicator:
pH/femperature Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
, .
~/?2l5Z,
I I
Fonn reviewed by:
2 I/
Water
Level
.
Purge
Well Purging Record
. FCX n~
Statesville, North Carolina , ~~~
viii is ~ Jji,/r1 ,,-/-o
(a~nd »ei
vtll
Removed -
Volume ~Comments(Clarity, color, odor)
o f\1n N6f SAmPui lr.L -
.
.
Date:
Page 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site: F(X
Well ID: nwJ~q
Water Level Indicator:
pH/femperature Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
If /7_;1,/r,.7
I I
Form reviewed by:
Water
Level
II/V
\ll;;D
IT 5'
Purge
Well Purging Record
FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
col)fdXo .0r1)f
6-½ )7:?D
Volume ~Comments(Clarity, color, odor)
Removed
0
1,9.3 'q 14 )".'?> }' In
3,loln (,' 14 'fl.1 (._ I( I,{)
t;', YR l.b \ '-1 11.i I ,t\ ()
.
•
-
Date:
Page 1
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
Sile: Fe~
Well ID: Mm~
Water Level Indicator:
pH/fempcrature Meter:
Conductivity Meler:
Borehole diameter:
Total deplh of well:
Deplh to water:
Water column:
Date Time
' ---~ ---
41/.0/
3Z77 (p,Z3
Water
Level
Fonn reviewed by:
Purge
Well Purging Record
FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
v,...,, ~•~)'(cr.;ry,wl~,..,,, ,,.-;;-r.•J Removed . 14 '
0
1 ..... ," Is::.£.""-' k?~·~. ~K)
') ·76 ~ -J.!J,00 -,4C
.\.., io,J /11 71). ;;,o UC(rQ
.I, ;IiJ;. '-1--,< :Jn.t~o C 'C/D
'
Date:
Page 1
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sile:
Well ID:
Waler Level lndicalor:
pHffemperature Meler:
Conduclivily Meler:
Borehole diameter:
Tola] depth of well:
Depth to waler:
Water column:
Date Time
,\· -~ 11./lU \'\'J: ()
/jJl ~
f,{ ;,:Jo
Form reviewed by:
Waler
Level
~o ~o
ld.0
Purge
Well Purging Record
FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
l27J7
/4 J-0 jD
)~l"f /(/JO
Volume ~C.mmm•(CJ.,;O,<ol&, ""'l Removed
0
L-~ :1 ~ 9<>i0 /.~b-7 ;Jt2 /Jl,-J 1"10
t•• 7 :24 'J.l'J t. fq(_)
. .
•
Date:
Page 1
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site:
Well ID:
Water Level Indicator:
p!Vfemperature Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
.
4121/ldl ti,'/!t 11 , tl,'/ ,,,.,
ll. ·,<i , , ,1,1
.Form reviewed by:
Water
Level
Purge
Well Purging Record
FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
v,rum, ~Cruruooo"'Cl'"'Y, oolM, ""''
Removed
0
l ' 2 2 "' ~ 1 L 7, d C,l 10
2,li~ 10, , /1 l I £1 :J C. /C-/17
3, iP(p 5': ,? . l/ I! tJ,;) ', CJ(')
.c,• ··-~ AT '1.'l/5111v1
•
Date:
o ...... ,.,,, 1
-.. ·
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
Site: £()(
Well ID: mw -lo D
Water Level Indicator:
pH/femperarw-e Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
Y,LJ;fbl. ,,,ow
.
Form reviewed by:
4 /f
Water
Level
.
Purge
Well Purging Record
FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
Vol=• ~;;1p1~.f -"(aorizy, ~•,. 000,) Removed
0
~6 / 12 ·100
·10 Jt/ I J ,,,., t.3'00 \\0 1. '/ IY 1', {,,
F-.+,,:-0 !Th AT )/ '{)'°M_
n,.01 ir~P,~ A,,;_
12 :zz.
.. . . , .
· ......... __ _. ... _ .. . . · .. c, _.'l
. ..
.
!:) -L,)
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site:
Well JD:
Water Level Indicator:
pWfemperature Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
--
Water
Level
10::)1 A 1 • /'\'S( 'i I\
I ./J5A 1
I , l/ • I • /t'I \
I's 1i' " IZ'. ,rff
~' Ptv t-,
·&:Vf'I i"\
•
.
Form reviewed by:
i
Purge
Well Purging Record
.FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
v,,.,,, ~C.mmrn .. Cl>rify, ro_,, _,.,,
Removed
0
1.1,9 I,.. CJ ·:::; /,7(;
Cl. ?'l 5.c, 21 I
I (1 (,~
. 1. It,. Cj,J 2-lv I~ , i Si.J-n lt£T ,fhl
/(l.M --.7 a3 ;(, ~ 5/(~~ ~-i1 -I ,,
l?,nc'i 5,·; Z·Y IC -. ~ Oi "\; .
I • . ') I 1 • ,c;.r I 5: I,, ?Pi I C L 3 ') f?,, O I' J:"h (Y!t •
17.~ ~ ,5. (o 2~ J} I (.. I ,, ') "'' c;; .TI) i.!~ -I'
'lf'),(Y c;; ( A 7F, Ir i,C--(. '7 111P ~ ,1) iTI,
~A{, 1.:~r1-,, .A:f"-1~~
.
.
. . ..
.•.• > _ ..
•
Date:
•
-· L
~
)
It
b
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site:
Well ID:
Water Level Indicator:
p!Vrcmperaturc Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
.
@J/Jz
~
Form reviewed by:
511.m-
42 I 'JOI II, IQ'
Water
Level
/J'.:?J
17:.).o
Purge
Well Purging Record
FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
rodJtJ ~,1lr ~
IJ<JO
v,...,, ~C.=mH(Cl•IO, col~, OOill)
Removed
0
I ,8?) . ~ 1 _ 10. 5-rD
-S. nln /,7. II? 2. ;Jo. -z__ /4'-fo
17:tp 5 . • { /1 I •. :,, ? t.o c;r;z,o
'
. . ·.· '.' :-.. , :·-.: :
.. ' ... .
•
Date:
Page 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site:
Well ID:
Water Level Indicator:
pH/fempcrature Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
I ' Y/7JJ/07, ·1:7il/f
7 .,
Form reviewed by:
2."
Water
Level
n
.
· Purge
Well Purging Record
FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
KJ/LL-fuff5E 2,/2 G/HLONS
Vo..,, ~C-eo«(C .. ri<,, ro,~. 000<)
Removed
0
O.lJ5 io; · I .' >CJO!O
<,nOf'FD Pup:: i"r,y,,, n,, . 77) L-\IR 1 . {;f'i iN
d'..J . n,n 11.\AT
5) Lr'H.Pt,P( A-L'•
'
.. . . .. I -
•
-
Date:
Page 1
r1 ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
D
Sile: f[X
We II ID: M,W ::-}( )
Water Level Indicator:
pWfempcraturc Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
2 I/
Purge
Well Purging Record
FCX
Stalcsvillc, North Carolina
Depth to water:
Water columo:
'ft ,0'
)~01/? IIJ,·u Ptd'IJ£ 0,8z. G,ftlWNS
Date Time Water Volume ~Conunents(Clarity, color, odor)
Level Removed
' 0
I.ff) u 'iZ,, 3:':f) o. 05 -· --Klar 8' \I'll) C.-H Tu
I Fh IA )WTT. J r:',I.AA-II
LW..Jfli 1<.:& Of'..:i, ~ F
A lv}\.1 ~ T:e,t. •
) j I "-."I ""!Sj\" / '"'--" 1Y\ll '>Tl I j
{,lr
~
..
•
.
.
Form reviewed by: Date:
Page 1
i
,
I (!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site:
Well ID:
Water Level Indicator:
pH/fcmperaturc Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
Y/~('f). 1 /.;J-:J::)
Form reviewed by:
Water
Level
Purge
Well Purging Record
FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
( cJ)PrW _snt{t{
@r ;}',00
v,,=, ~c"T.J'c,mo. ~•~ .• ,,,,
Removed '/ /.
0 .
~ 7f7 0 Cj~<J
'-I (,_(\ 0.. ,1.0. (\(\C)
(, {,.~ °' \;.O q<\\)
•
..
Date:
Page 1
•
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site:
Well ID: .
Water Level Indicator:
pH/fempcrature Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
Form reviewed by:
Water
Level
Purge
Well Purging Record
FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
Volume ~Comments(Clarity, color, odor)
Removed
0
;· .
.:::.;:i:i}'.· . .. '' . • .. · .. c:r~: ,,
'' .·. ',•
,, •
-
Date:
Page 1
_. . ty:;_;
_.-I·. . :-· -
1:.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1,
I
I
I·
I
I·
I .,
I
I
I
Purge
Well Purging Record
.FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
Site: __._fi...,CX-~--
Well ID: 2LIS f~9" i../ 6rlJ()b 1 ~ r-'J'/3 H1-.
{oJ/d~~I ob p:oo
tp/e~ Ot-pJ i,1, 1:i:J~ -
Water Level Indicator:
pH/fempcraturc Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
· Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
'-ll,3lo') \~:>,O
f;)~so
f/:1JO
'!;;so
'/:'Is
Form reviewed by:
4 ,,
(t5,5'
-M£
~1 wiu PwPie I I/, lfi fjklWNS
Water Voh,m, ~~"\~,w•~•"'°'' Level Removed t,. : , ~ -~ 0
','.31\ '/, -,. 11. !IA .
1£\ ;,_ ).~ •. l IY-q~o ' . ;Po~ 79' ~< t,f?:J 100
1()0~ 7.4 L15 ,~ '., J7.{0
II I,..-7.P l,;)f I'✓-< . ' f:J<JO v
Dale:
Page 1
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site:
Well ID: »l-26S:
Water Level Indicator:
pH/femperarure Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
:J.5,DO
Purge
Well Purging Record
FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
td/ed,IJ #·
/}t J/;r:Jo
Total depth ofweH:
Depth to water:
Water column: ~.r7" 1.34 "" ~,O:J.
Date Time Water Volume ~"7'<,(ClariO,rol~.-) Level Removed
0
YPP2 II ·-1 7 ff, 7';V }/41'1#/
:}. "J l5.? 6-17-£ WV 7 J"1.. ~ .I , 'l,o 5.,p 7 /7,Y C/C/,,f} J ♦L ' I -
.
.
,· .. · . • . ., "•
F. ·':::>: I,:"'·. < ... ., ,. ·.· -.,. . -~ -, > ... ,::~, ,, , . ·. ... -~· .. ,· . . 't',-
: ·, . • .
. . . -.
Form reviewed by: Date:
Page 1
\
/
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I:
.1
I
:I
I .,
I,
I
I
I
I
Site:
Well ID:
Water Level Indicator:
pH/femperature Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
' .
i//mfl ,,q: '.2{"\
I I ~.:t/{
~:>
Form reviewed by:
Water
Level
Purge
Well Purging Record
FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
1oltt11J ot L~ 00
~::;, I
Vol=o ~""""""'C"'"', ro_,, """l
Removed 77,(f!g TU'tf t?
0 ~
I <1J .B 1 lo I CJ. 7° z. 7,:;., U', ~ x' '1' JO 1q, c;o ·~
:A 8 7 LY q '1t70 Jq. :.3
. ..
''• . ,-)75 It' /• '. , .. , ·-., ..
. ':: ·::',_:' .··· ;. '··
:
-
Date:
Page 1
..
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I,
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I I
I
Site:
Well ID:
Water Level Indicator:
pl-Vfemperature Meter:
Conductivity Meter:
Borehole diameter:
Total depth of well:
Depth to water:
Water column:
Date Time
. .
1//J'/fr2. ,
Form reviewed by:
Water
Level
15
3D
Lf?
Purge
Well Purging Record
FCX
Statesville, North Carolina
Vol=, ~Commoo .. CoriO, oo•,. odo)
Removed
0 .
t. /J /:_.., ; vvo
c; 1 l'J l~•.6 '-4~.:b.!J
5,7 IJ !S.t po
..
..
'
' ! .• .. ,c: .. . .. ··;:-,.· . .. .
r'
-
Dale:
Page 1
.;
. . .
·□·' ,",
' '• ·-· ..
',;. I• ·:=~·:! :· :::{'· ::::·. .,
.•• 'Ji • :' ,_.,,-,
_,, ,_,
'. l.
·, :_ -:•.' /:· ·-. ; :·_/:·~~--~: _?'~ -.'·
. ·-; ·~ .-:~ '\
., '. ·:. ! . ~ ......
~ ·: ...
: '1·· ·., '' ··, .. ·_..,-': ..
·· . ..,•
,, ,, ~-.
. \. -· ... , ., ,::5.,
.::\ :/~;-i· })·'
'f. ::--,•:
·r: ·,) ... •:
. . ',_ . .... •··
-~·--: . ;: :.
! . ,'
'.;_\·: .
'' .-.. , . •·•
. .. . •'' ' . •:-J..;-''
.,
·, .•·-
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
ff
I
n
I
I ,,
' :
I
I
I
I
APPENDIXD
TRAFFIC REPORTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY
---,.-.-..., ·~I --, Organic Traffic R"':;rt -....,. ........ --......, ......, _,
--C EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency Case No,
~a, Contract Laboratory Program & Chain of Custody Record JtPI,/ ~ (For Organic CLP Analysis)
1. Project Code tJ,!J.,.-ot/C, 3 2. Reg2to·1 Sampw§.$7bA/ \2~ ~¼~arrierh;a~ ~-o~C 6. Matrix 7. Preservative
> (Enter in (Entsrln
Account Code S~Name) hJ. Air6~1:9n berg~.::J-t, '(/}~/ 6134 Column A) ColumnD)
'ZMMirJf!..I,4 1/2.f) 1. Surtace Water 1. HCI
2. Ground Water 2. HN03
Site Name Sampler Zinnair,r• / L/ 3. Leachate 3. NaHS04 '.7/. 4. Field QC 4. H2S04 , -/ -r 5. Soil/Sediment 5. Ice only
5. Ship To: CiF ~A1ze, ~t>MT~lv
kX / 5f IF{es//a~ /t> PE,'J-N NA-ti>~ .t),,e. I f'i',jr )OSe•" Eariy~loo 6. PE-water 6. CH30H
• ' ~IA
Long-Temi )v A-/!/f!Jl6rlrtV'%TTj,££ ~B;i.. 7. PE-soil 7. Other /specify ~ PA """' 8. Other /specify in in Column D)
Site Spill ID Op Unit • REM ~ N. Not Preserved -City, Slate Column A) ST RI !"c4,eG;il ~/US6N '5f m~ lit"~ ;t,t.-, -FED SI -BZ ESI ATTN: M
CLP A B C D E F G H I J K
Sample Matrix Cone.: Sample Preser-RAS Analysis Regional Specific Station Mo/Day/ Corresponding Sampler Field QC
Numbers (from Type: vative TA TA TA Tracking Number Location Year/Time CLP Inorganic Initials Qualifier
(from labels) Box 6) (from I""" :;:jp' (circle one) (ciftje one) or Tag Numbers Identifier Sample Sample No. B • Blank S • Reid Spi:,e
Other. Low Comp./ Box 7) nn* 7 1 ..,,..,. 7 14 ,, pR*71421 Collection O•FioklOuplea , . .,,,_
Med Grab Other. -Pesv PE • Pertorm Eval. VOA BNA PCB
/)/"IT t,J I)-L,... ,Gr I >< I.; '1,1{)/)q4/ /l'/W-5,1) V.z. ·/4., · l.6~ '-•A --;7t,t 7P
/)l'JWb .a...,, L... (; ,.. I ><--M-1/~.1~/tli/cr /J1a;-~q ,_ 'bd·/7t!7 /n/)/"f /, I ✓? V
h/"Jt11? ~ L,... l-,r / '><" if _,+:-@t'Jt) /tJ 1,/,;2. Rk.P-~ t1 /tJ. /,,,t, AA, ,7,C:.
1>1'11,V/3 .:;... [,,-1,,,,-I '...c" WS~dtJt1tl I tJ i/l'J 7A-o~ ,,/. i'O•/"l!Zr, .7):::: T,e.rP n., ••
, , -, ./
r--I ,-, -, _ .... A
l'V'lN • ::TCONTR JL. -
Al<.Z-T'
Shipment fod?ase _l.~;e/ VOA MSIMSD Required? c;fN Sample#: D/ ,, Additional Sampler Signatures Chain of Custody Seal Number(s)
Complete? N) BNA MSIMSD Required? YIN Sample#:
Pes~CB Msn.tSD R~uired? Y/N Samole#:
*PR orovldes 7-day 9;3!a turnaround in addition to preliminary results. Requests for Cha'in of Custod Record prehmmary results will increase analytical costs.
Relinqui ed b (Signature) Date I Time Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) Date/ Time Received by: (Signature)
ff Jil',ji ~" 0
Date /Time Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) Date/ Time Received by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) Date/Time Received for Laboratory by:
.(Signature)
Date/Time Remarks: Is custody seal intact? YIN/none
IMtribulioll: Blue· Region Copy Pink· SMO Copy
'Mtile • Lab Copy for Retum lo SMO Yellow• Lab Copy for Retum to Region
EPA Form 9110-2 (2199)
See Reverse for Additional Standard Instructions
**See Reverse for Purpose Code Definitions
404488 ClASS-!lS-001
iiiil
/J -
1. Project C~e:J-tJ
Account Code
'Pfl orovides 7-dav Qata turnaround lo addition (o preliminary results. Requests for preilmma resultsw,11,ncrease anal ,cal costs. Chain of Custod Record
Relin e Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) Date/ Time ptJ
e Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) Date/Time
6. Matrix
(Enter in Column A)
7. Preservative
(Enter in
CotumnD)
:,I 1. Surtace Water
2. Ground Water
3. Leachate
4. Field QC
5. Soil/Sediment
6. PE-water
7. PE-soil
8. Other (specify in
Column A)
I
Corresponding
CLP Inorganic
Sample No.
J
Sampler
Initials
Received by: (Signature)
Received by: (Signature)
1. HCI
2. HN03
3. NaHS04
4. H2S04
5. Ice only
6. CH30H
7. 01/ler /specify
in Column D)
N. Nol Preserved
K
Field QC
Qualifier
a • Blank s • Field Spike
D • Fleld OuplicaU
R•Rinuta
PE• Pw1orm e~■-
0
Relinquished by: (Signature) Date/Time Received for Labcratory by:
(Signature)
Date /Time Remarks: Is custody seal intact? YIN/none
Distribution: Blue • Region Copy Pink. SMC Copy
White -lab Copy lot Return lo SMC Yellow • Lab Copy for Return to Regi:m
EPA Form 9110-2 (2/99)
See Reverse ror Additional Standard Instructions
"See Reverse for Purpose Code Definlilons
404486 CLASS-!>".
liiiil
Cit State
M
CLP A
Sample Matrix
Numbers (from
(from labels) Box 6)
Other:
Site Spill ID Op Unit
'~"":""' PA
REM
RI
SI ESI
Long-Term
AcrlOII ~:
hipTo/ff, '=746/VT.CA
/5ff $Aa;O',(_q-,.e"~ ~, So
/2W /1/oPJ)ll)Nj~ 7X 77 3& o
ATTN: /:El}/)
F
Regional Specific
Tracking Number
or Tag Numbers
G
Station
Location
Identifier
Mo/Day/
Year/Time
Sample
Collection
6. Matrix
(£nterln
Column A)
7. Preservative
(Enter In
Column D)
1. Surlace Water 2. Ground Water
3. Leachate
4. Field QC
5. Soil/Sediment
6. PE-water
7. PE-soil
8. Other (specify in
Column A)
I
Corresponding
CLP Inorganic
Sample No.
J
Sampler
Initials
1. HCI
2. HNO3
3. NaHS04
4. H2S04
5. Ice only
6. CH3OH
7. Other (specify
in Column DJ
N. Not Preserved
K
Field QC
Qualifier
B•Blri S•Fleld59lt 0 • Field 014)1c .. •·-PE • Perfoml ev..
Shipment !~ase
Complete '(YIN)
Page/ VOAMSIMSD Required? y __L of -BNA MSIMSD Required? y
Sample#: Additional Sampler Signatures Chain of Custody Seal Number(s) Sample#:
Pest/PCB MSIMSO R uired? ~ Sam le#:
•pf! provides 7-day da!a turnaround in addition to prelim'1nary results. Requests for prehrtirna results Will increase an 1ca! costs. Chain of Custody Record
Relinquished by: (Signature) Date/Time
Received by: (Signature)
Received for Laboratory by: {Slgneture)
Distribution: Blue • Region Copy Pink· SMO Copy . White. Lab Copy for Return lo SMO Yeller#. Lab Copy fol Return 10 Region
Relinquished by: (Signature) Date I Time Received by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) Date/Time Received by: (Signature)
Date /Time Remarks: Is custody seal intact? YIN/none
EPA Form 9110-2 (2199)
See Reverse for Additional Standard Instructions
.. See Reverne for Purpose Code DeflniUons
CLASS-99-001
404487
liiiil
-------......, W~ ~ ----le cR -Case NO. c,i, ~ United States Environmental Protection Agency & Ch · f C t d R d 3tP///8 ~ Contract Laboratory Program a,n O · US O Y ecor (For Organic CLP Analysis)
1. ProjectC~~-t?~93 2. Regffo·\ Sampl~$/O,,{/ 4. Date Shipped \ Carrier/;€£.)e=,RA'.'.; fu /?£5':.. 6. Matrix 7. Preservative
(Enter in (Enter in Account Code ~Name) h, Airbill Numberb',;h "7/?:, -, _ ,;~1~6/f'-;) Column~) Column DJ
MZ.Tl2J:A-,,ep 1. Surtace Water 1. HCI fi/::/1,'5/f'tJ )5"1~ )(,/J?:&1 2. Ground Water 2. HN03 Site Name Samplerrn~ _ / V 5. Ship To: If f 5qfiA17Z:rZ:,.C/ 3. Leachate 3. NaHS04
pc,)< /7fAfESVJ.Uif'
-4. Field QC 4. H2S04 '<-/ I /~# .5At,,V/,XA~ Ro) :}l; ,SbS 5. Soil/Sediment 5. Ice only ,r·· ,~, ' 6. PE-water 6. CH30H " _IA Long.Term 7l-!e /AIClltJUi-/llP>_;7X 77 38 CJ 7. PE-soil 7. Other (specify SF PA Action 8. Other /specify in in Column OJ Site Spill ID Op un·,1 RP -REM
Mis
City, State ST -RI
ATTN ,k'.i:; PP y h M/11 lifZ-
Column A) N. Not Preserved 7{A1~~/i/C, FEO -ii BZ -SI M
CLP A B C D E F I G H I J K Sample Matrix Cone.: Sample Preser-RAS Analysis Regional Specific Station Mo/Day/ Corresponding Sampler Field QC Numbers (from Type: vative TA TA TA Trackin~ Number Location Year/Time CLP Inorganic Initials Qualifier (from labels) Box 6) (from 1-7.1 I-~ (ciltle~ or Tag umbers Identifier Sample Sample No. B•Blri. S•Flc!h!Spb Other: Low Comp.I Box 7) oo• 7 '21 loo• 7 21 oo* 7 '21 Collection O•FllldOupk-. Pesv •·-Med Grab Othe, VOA BNA. PCB PE • Penom,_ Ev,..&
/),7,.,. a. L-~ I ~ I~ X /«-Q .,.,.,,v~f" '=,&?-o I l,fj!.>4,6~: MPO Upl'?T9 ---.:-:L':'·-.. • ... OA"/~t.f ,JI
11<1WLL _,,,_ '-~ ,r I ><' ~ >< t,,5-d P<J CV/,!;:~ Ou/J-tP~ II,_ .., -,.,.,,/, vf/J/'9W:t-:7r" /) 'J/(Jbt// ~ L /'..r I ----.e "><'.:'_ __,,,. /41.>-Lf ~~ ~o/ 74 Utv-/?1>· ,,, ,l tJ~:IUF. U~/qtv/ -::7F /)f1W3 ~ L ty / --:::,..:::... '>C X ws--=4 g '2~~{,. Mlt/-h< , ;;""" U/J/'1W3 'r r ' l Mt/I~ ,;2._ L-Gr I .....___,_,,-IY:S'...; {/ -• IP.!!. p., Tl!, tJ/ W,;~ ~.15!.S' '-' 'F . /
Shipment for Case _J~i~ VOA MS/MSD Required? N Samole #: 0/ ?lf/.5 Additional Sampler Signatures Chain of Custody Seal Number(s) Complete? (Y/NA/ BNA MS/MSD Required? h-1 Samole#: 0/, ,IA,),:/
PestlPCB MS/MSO R~~-IN Samole#: n,/&1/~/ 2
•p~ orovides 7-day data turnaround in addition to preliminary results. Requests tor Cha'in of Custod Record prehrtunary results will increase analytical costs,
Relinquished by: (Signature) Date/ Time
Received by: (Signature)
Received for Laboratory by:
(Signature)
Dislribulion; Blue • Region Copy Pink· SMO Copy White • Lab ~PY for Retum to SMO Yellow• Lab Copy for Re tum to Regbrl
Date/ Time Received by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) Date/Time Received by: (Signature)
Date/Time Remarks: Is custody seal intact? YIN/none
EPA Form 9110-2 (2/99)
See Reverse for Additional Standard Instructions
"See Reverse for Purpose Code Definitions
CLASS-9~1 404489
=------._, --iillJ -liilll --

-
-.., -Inorganic Traffic Report Case No. Q EPA United Slates Envlronmenlal Protedlon Agency ~J' Contrad Laboratcry Program If Ujo:Y' & Chain of Custody Record
(For Inorganic CLP Analysls) ~~/6
; 1. Project Code I 2. Account Code 3. R"?t No. Sa~~ PAI 5. ,9ae '"I"""" 1 Canter ~ 7. Matrix 8. Pneservatlve P.P-t'.;:.-1:; : .k~c£Al-~Bs imrlrt =:DJ 1111t1AJ Regional information ~(Name/ ~ -Ai'rlllll wr ~q ~~/~I 111-1. Surface Water 1. HCI '.J:MMZr,eJ:A-~ 2. Ground Water 2, HN03 Non-Superfund Program Sampler )lgnabjpr ,/ f/ 6. Ship To: Ul!E..vY ~ If? ln:a4l-,,-
3. Leachate 3. NaOH 4. Aeld 4, H~04 / I , I 5. Soll/Sediment 5. K~R 0,
Slte~/4 VtJrpo,e' """T'"" ~ M-9,p.t:;S.?/il /2VE, 8. OIi (High only) 8. Ice onr, ,k)t, ~&v'/:Uc CLEM _._,
7. Waste (High only) 7. Other sp&CI/-/ ~ ._
PA -FS --;Y1.IV~ ~7J7 3 8. OOler (spec/ft In In Column DJ ~~Nd -REM .:ii i Column A/ N. Not Prasetved Site Spill IQ -Rl At.~Ct E/1' ,f#..S -SI -ATTN: ESI
CLP A B C D E RAS Ana MIS F G H I J K Sample Matrix Cone.: Sample Presar-Low ~~ Regional Specific Station Mo/Day/ Corres~dlng Sampler Aeld QC Numbeni (from Low Type: vatlve J 11 On• Tracldn~ Number LocaUon Yearmme CLP rganlc Initials Qualifier (from labels) Box 7) Med Comp./ (from fl li I or Tag umbers ldenUfier Sample Sample No. B•Blri: S•si,ic;• Ollie,: High Grab Box8) ~ Collectlon D•-R•-01hr. PE• Ptrtrm Eval,
-■ Not i ,;.;.-s.-·· . lnnleJ? n .::i---l-6T .1-/f-lS-41 t't't>/t1/,,2...., '!~A "<tJ / 7~/4 ~/,U,,' -;~ b • I I 1'/b/<17.' ~ '-~ ,.. .!1--NG-• ~ <JOO/Rt:'~ A-1A-t-~d
';fplt.'17 !)--6'---'-/2 -~ A/,~--• t i1tl CJ/t'tJ6 IX/,,P-tJ/
Molerl' , ..!L, '--;;'r· ~ .:t--W.5-, t ~t'CJ/t:>/e, //1'1,I .er:
MO ''r/' ::> ~ t.-(; r .;!-U/S,--4 /)(J/) qq ., /4w-J/ /)11}/' n, {)-. L-t ... /J.-Y/~..!., ~M~t i&j t. C ~-, . -,' I ~ 1t101q,-, ~ L, ,r ~ M-~~tJoCJ"?<J'q ,l,f,W-)'
MIJ!iJWP ~ L C. ,-~ K ws-'1-ot11Jlt'J~o /l'JW-55 -.,,v,7Wb ~ L ... ~ ~ w5-,!t<J1Jt1/t>39i /i1tt1-~q 'MIJ/~Y/ a,, L :;_ X , .,,. / t?t?t? /tJP-4 fA;-tJJ ' .,..
Shipment ~se :omplete? ) Per~ ..Lot
Sample(s) to be Used for Laboratay QC
'tf1Pl9AIP -M~jM$[>
I Additional Sampler Slgnaturaa
Chain of Custody Record
Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signsture)
Received by: (Signature J Relinquished by: (S/gnsture)
'
J (.,~ Dl4TI vP :N
L -,.-Pl'1T.#-, .::JP D
J, .,.M.:IJl. /)/. '/ ""T z::: ~7'
•/ ,,--;;~ /J/• 1rs. \ c::---.
I .~.;~ , /.)p "/6;, -rp
~' /4i:~ 17 /.J / '1'T .:;z.. ,Tl=-
[Lj/~3/,'J{. Jt;,, 't>Jc,WtJ JP-
,/_ ,,L:. •l'H , Ol'!/A/6 ' ·r-. ,, /4:~ , t>l'!X I ,-rp-
, , ,,,, Chain of Custody Seal Number(s)
Date/ Time
12,H;,I I 3 3 -3A
Received by: (Signature} Akzs
Received by: (Signatura)
!e6nqulshed by: (Signature) Date I Time Received for Laboratory by:
(Signature/
Date /Time Remarks: Is custody seal Intact? YIN/none
llltrlbuUon: 8-. Rogian Copy Pink, CUS8 Copy WIINI • Lab Copy ro, Rotum lo Ra;loo Yollow • Lab Copy lor Rotum lo CI.A88 EPA Form 9110-1 (8/99)
a..-.rorAddJllonal atandardl-
'9• -for p.._. Code Dlftnlllont
399850
ft EA~ Inorganic Traffic Report Case No .
.._._.. United ~~~i,:,~~ ~~~ Agency & Chain of Custody Record / L
..... (For Inorganic CLP Analysis) So-// B
1. Project Code ,2. Account Code 3. Rei io No. Sem9l\ng,Co. 5._.9~ ~~ I Carrier /-. C::
t~>t:¥/f3 '-Wt:-S7l)IV w~ IP~ rE/Jc/e,ft_ c5Cf'l!E>5
Regional lnfomlallon Se~!!" (Name) r Alrblll ~ber
7. Matrix
(Enter In o,,.,,,,, ,<)
6. Preservative
(Enlerln
0,,.,,,,, DJ
VI/,fMCftaA 17J)l/),, p~9"6tj$.P-/~// ti-
Non-Superfund Program Sempler;;ignatu~ / 6. Ship To: L -t / JI 1 , L
-I ~ -, , I:U.J! TJ MNAL-v rz Cl!-
CLP A B C D E RASAna Is F G
Semple Matrix Cone.: Semple Preser-~ : , Regional Specific Station
Number, (from Low Type: vatlve t.. :I Tracking Number Location
(from labels) Box 7) Med Comp./ (from :I :I f f f j or Tag Numbeni Identifier
Olher: High Grab Box 8) ~ ~ _; l i.
Other.
H
Mo/Day/
Yearmme
Sample
Collection
1. Surface Water
2. Ground Water
3. Leachate
4. Field
5. Soll/Sediment
6. Oil (High only)
7. Waste (High only)
6. other (specify in
Column A)
I
Com>spondlng
CLP Organic
Semple No.
J
Sampler
Initials
1. HCI
2. HNO3
3. NaOH
4. H~"04
5. K~R 0?
6. lceont
7. Other (specify
In Column DJ
N.NotPrese<ved
K Field QC
Qualifier e • Blltit s • Spb O•-R•-PE•PwbmE'tll. -•Not ~ ...
'·-V,1 ti-L ,,,,.,.. ~ }
11/)/' ~~ :;..✓ I _... ,P.-I)
w£ :t,t. OtJ/JliP~ r
· WG-/1-oo;; 1~4'-3
/?11P-t:J.S ,n. ~ ,✓-.,.&" 0/~)l,;J.-, I,_,...
Shipment foi_£a_se
Complete? [91N) ,._P•~ ,1 • Sample(s) to be Used for Laboratory QC
-F of ...sc MI) 19 t,(,I $ -"'4 f /,11,ts p
Jl?u/-.::j-V, ·• :~ • ./}Jqt(/$ ,Jf-
Additional Sampler Slgnaturas Chain of Custody Seal Number(s)
Chain of Custody Record ,
~e0nQ1Jlshed by: (Signature)
Received by: (Signature)
'/)
Received by: (Signature)
Date/ Tune Received for Laboratory by:
(Signature)
Clnon•RooianCopy Plnk•CUl8Copy
Whllo • I.ab Copy lor _,,, o, R,glGn Yollow•UbC"1'f lat Rotum o, CUSS
Relinquished by: (S/gnsture) Date /Time Received by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Slgnsture) Date /Time Received by: (Signature)
Date/ Tune Remarl<s: la custody seal Intact? YIN/none
EPA Form 9110·1 (8/99)
... _.., __ ,_ ,_
'8• -for PUIIIOU C4de Doflnltlonl
399854
.. , . : ....
.. • ..
., ;,,_, ~,,
. . ,-. :, . i'. •,l: •• ...
'·
'• .·' -.. :,_1 .-~' ..
·,:,f••. . .._
"· ~-: :,.~·-.:··->:-. ~~:; -;•,. '~~-'
-; • ,· --,.1
r,·{·.: ... .':-....
•:• ' . ::~;··~-•,:
' ~ ~ t '•, ' :. ' ~---( .. . ·-..... , .
'i-_; "· , :. ..
• ,~ ~ > •
-~. :•::.•: ··•.,,, '' .,.~ ,i' r •
~ • -. I • • ! e
~,..., ' "·, i ·. \, ...
·\i-::t·; .. '
' .. ·-'• ~:~x-..
.-. ·,
/ ~'. .,:, __ ._ ....
,·
~ \ ~ !-: •• ? .,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIXE
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS
I
I
I
I
I
I MEMORANDUM
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4
Science and Ecosystem Support Division
980 College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30605-2720
Date: 06/03/2002 I Subject: Results of VOLATILES Sample Analysis
I
I
I
02-0493 FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Statesville, NC
From: Mcconney, John ~'c c..5
To: Mallary, Ken
CC: Ralph McKeen
RACSNJ
I Thru: QA Office
DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBER ].,H.>h ~ 1, -
::A--lJ.U:,, p
I Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. If you have any
questions, please contact me.
I
I
I
I ATTACHMENT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Case Number:
Site ID. I Date:
I Affected Samples
VOA I 4378,4379,4381-
4384,43 86-4394,
14399,4400
4378,4381-4385,
14387-4390,4399
4379
14380,4395,4396
4380,4385,4395,
14396
14380
•
4381,~384,4388,
389 -·
4385
I
11'385
lt386
4386
I
I
30418
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Project
Number 02-0493
FCX. Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
5/24/02
Compound or Fraction
methyl acetate
1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
I, 1-dichloroethane
bromomethane, chloroethane
I ,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
I, 1-dichloroethene, I, I -dichloroethane, cis-1,2-
dichloroethene, trichloroethene, xylene(total)
tetrachloroethene
chloromethane, bromomethane, chloroethane,
trichlorofluoromethane, I, I -dichloroethene,
I, I ,2-trichloro-I ,2,2-trifluoroethane, acetone
I, I -dichloroethene, I, I ,2-trichloro-I ,2,2-
trifluoroethane, I, 1-dichloroethane, cis-1 ,2-
dichloroethene, chloroform, trichloroethene
carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethene
cyclohexane, benzene, trichloroethene,
methylcyclohexane, I ,2-dichloropropane,
bromodichloromethane, cis-I ,3-dichloropropene,
toluene, trans-I ,3-dichloropropene, I, 1,2-
trichloroethane, ethylbenzene, xylene(total),
styrene, isopropylbenzene, I, I ,2,2-
tetrachloroethane, I ,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
Flag
Used
R
J
J
J
R
J
J
J
J
J
J
SAS Number NIA
Reason
erratic initial & continuing
calibration relative response
factors
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
< quantitation limit
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
erratic initial & continuing
calibration relative response
factors
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
< quantitation· limit
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
I
I
I
I Case Number:
Site ID.
I Date:
I Affected Samples
4386
I
4390
14391
4391,4393
14393
14393
14395
14400
14378,4384,4386
0
m
4378-4393
I
I
I I
30418
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Project
Number
FCX. Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
5/24/02
Compound or Fraction
methylcyclohexane, l ,2-<libromo-3-
chloropropane
methylene chloride
chloroform, tetrachloroethene
I, 1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, 1,2-<libromo-3-
chloropropane
ethylbenzene
xylene(total)
I, 1-<lichloroethene, I, l ,2-trichloro-1,2,2-
trifluoroethane, I, 1-<lichloroethane, cis-1,2-
dichloroethene, chloroform, trichloroethene
I, 1-<lichloroethane, bromochloromethane,
chloroform, cis-1,3-<lichloropropene, I, 1,2-
trichloroethane
2,4-<lichlorophenol, hexachlorobutadiene,
caprolactam, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol, 2,4,6-
trichlorophenol, 2,4,5-trichlorophenol, 1,1'-
biphenyl, dimethylphthalate, diethylphthalate,
4,6-<linitro-2-methylphenol, 1,2,4,5-
tetrachlorobenzene, pentachlorophenol, di-n-
butylphthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-octylphthalate
02-0493 SAS Number NIA
Flag
Used
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Reason
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
contaminated storage blank
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
< quantitation limit
warning high in low
concentration PE sample
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
3,3'-<lichlorobenzdine J erratic continuing
calibration response factor
I
I
I
I Case Number:
Site ID. I Date:
I Affected Samples
14379
I
I
4381,4385
14382
I
I
4387
14388
I
"389
D
I
I
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Project
30418 Number 02-0493
FCX. Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
5/24/02
Flag
Compound or Fraction Used
2,4-dichlorophenol, hexachlorobutadiene, 4-J
chloro-3-methylphenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol,
2,4,5-trichlorophenol, 4,6-dinitro-2-
methylphenol, 1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene,
pentachlorophenol, benzo(b )fluoranthene,
benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo( a)pyrene,
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene, dibenzo(a,h)anthracene,
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
caprolactam J
2,4-dichlorophenol, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol, J
1,1'-biphenyl, acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, 4,6-
dinitro-2-methylphenol, hexachlorobenzene,
atrazine, phenanthrene, anthracene,
benzo(b )fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene,
benzo(a)pyrene, indeno(l,2)-cd)pyrene,
dibenzo( a,h)anthracene, benzo(g,h,i)perylene
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol J
2,4-dichlorophenol, hexachlorobutadiene, 4-J
chloro-3-methylphenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol,
2,4,5-trichlorophenol, 1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene,
pentachlorophenol
2-methylphenol, 4-methylphenol, 2,4-J
dimethylphenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, naphthalene,
hexachlorobutadiene, caprolactam, 4-chloro-3-
methylphenol, 2-methylnaphthalene, 2,4,6-
trichlorophenol, 2,4,5-trichlorophenol, I, 1 '-
biphenyl, 2-chloronaphthalene,
dimethylphthalate, acenaphthylene,
acenaphthene, diethylphtha!ate, 1,2,4,5-
tetrachlorobenzene, pentachlorophenol, di-n-
butylphthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-octylphthalate
SAS Number NIA
Reason
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
I
I
I
I Case Number:
Site ID. I Date:
I Affected Samples
4389
14390
I
4390
I
14391
I
4393
'4393 ~ -_
t394
I
ll'EST
4378-4394,4397,
lf398,440!
4378,4379
I
30418
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Project
Number 02-0493 SAS Number NIA
FCX. Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
5/24/02
Flag
Compound or Fraction Used
acetophenone J
caprolactam, 1,1'-biphenyl, dimethylphthalate, J
diethylphthalate, 4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol, di-
n-butylphthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-octylphthalate,
atrazine J .
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol, J
benzo(b )fl uoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene,
benzo(a)pyrene, indeno( I ,2,3-cd)pyrene,
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, benzo(g,h,i)perylene
2-nitroaniline, 3-nitroaniline, 2,4-dinitrophenol, J
4-nitrophenol, 4-nitroarriline, 4,6-dinitro-2-
methylphenol
benzaldehyde J
2-methylphenol, 4-methylphenol, 2,4-J
dimethylphenol
naphthalene, caprolactam, 2-methylnaphthalene, J
I, 1 '-biphenyl, 2-chloronaphthalene,
dimethylphthalate, acenaphthylene,
acenaphthene, diethylphthalate, di-n-
butylphthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-octylphthalate
caprolactam, atrazine, 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine J
methoxychlor J
beta-BHC J
Reason
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
< quantitation limit, erratic
initial calibration response
factor
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
erratic initial calibration
response factor
< quantitation limit
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Case Number:
Site ID.
Date:
Affected Samples
4379,4391
4381
4384
4392
4397
4401
I
30418
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Project
Number
FCX. Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
5/24/02
Compound or Fraction
heptachlor epoxide
all compounds
endrin ketone
gamma-BHC
heptachlor epoxide, dieldrin, methoxychlor
alpha-BHC, dieldrin
02-0493 SAS Number NIA
Flag
Used Reason
N difference in columns
J low surrogate recovery
N difference in columns
J < quantitation limit
N difference in columns
N difference in columns
mple 4378 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
,LATILES SCAN
:ility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
,gram;.SF
Statesville, NC
3tation: MW24 I
dia: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T1
D No: 19T1
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
SUL TS .sou .sou .sou .sou .sou .sou .sou .sou
S.OU .sou
.SOUR .sou
.SOU .sou .sou
1.3 .sou .sou .sou .sou .sou .sou
.68
2.3 .sou .sou .sou .sou
S.OU .sou .sou .sou
5.1
S.OU .sou
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS
. O.SOU o.sou o.sou
O.SOU o.sou o.sou
O.SOU o.sou o.sou
O.SOU o.sou
O.SOUJ o.sou
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 12:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDS)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE·
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence ot presence of material.
ll'alue is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
:ates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysls is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
Tlt.a;AM11!!!!9ANtllll1S == liiill
1mple 4378 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
SCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
1cility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
ogram;. SF
'Station: MW24 I
3dia:GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T1
D No: 19T1
:SUL TS
l.SOU
l.SOU
l.60J
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
UNKNOWN COMPOUND
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED
OCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
1ge value. NA•not analyzed. NAl•interferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04123/2002 12:00
Ending:
ti value is known to be less than value given, L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
::Hcates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
Tiple 4379 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
LATILES SCAN
;ility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
,grani:--SF
Statesville, NC
Produced by: McConney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002
Ending: ,tation: DUP01 /
dia: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T2
D No: 19T2
lnorg Contractor: LI BRTY
Org Contractor: A4
iULTS .sou
.SOU .sou .sou .sou
.SOU .sou .sou
5.0U . sou
.SOUR .sou .sou .sou
.23J
1.6
5.0U .sou .sou .sou .sou .sou .sou
2.7 .sou sou sou .sou
5.0U sou
sou sou
5.8
5.0U sou
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/l
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE .
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE .
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS UNITS
a.sou uGtL
0.SOU UG/L a.sou UG/L
0.SOU UG/L a.sou UG/L
0.50U UG/L
0.SOU UG/L
0.50U UG/L
O.SOU UG/L
0.SOU UG/L
O.SOU UG/L
0.SOU UG/L
0.SOU UG/L
e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive eVidence of presence of material.
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
,alue is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than yalue given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the numbef is the minimum quantitation limit. :ates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessaiy for verification.
Page 1 of 1
1111!!!1
mple 4379 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
SCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
cility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
igramc SF
Station: DUP01 /
,dia: GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T2
D No: 19T2
SULTS UNITS
•.SOU UG/L
•.SOU UG/L
I.S1J UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
UNKNOWN COMPOUND
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
tEPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED
lCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
-liill -lilll -.. Production Date: 06/03/2002 07:49
Produced by: McConney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002
Ending:
1e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quanlitation limit.
icates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampllng and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
11ple 4380 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
LATILES SCAN
:ility: FCX, Inc. (Slatesville Plant)
,gram:-SF
Statesville, NC
3tation: MW5D I
dia: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T4
DNo:19T4
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: CEIMIC
SULTS UNITS
10U UGIL
10U UGIL
10U UGIL
10UJ UGIL
10UJ UG/L
10U UGIL
5J UGIL
10U UGIL
10U UGIL
10U UG/L
10U UGIL
10U UG/L
10U UGIL
10U UG/L
6J UG/L
9J UG/L
10U UGIL
10U UGIL
10U UG/L
10U UGIL
10U UGIL
10U UG/L
10U UGIL
5J UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UGIL
10U UG/L
10U UGIL
10U UGIL
10U UGIL
10U UG/L
10U UGIL .
39 UGIL
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS
10U
10U
10U
4J
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10UR
10U
Je value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
liiil-----Product1on Date: 06/03/2002 07:49
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/2312002 16:30
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed tor but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
iicate& that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
.. nple 4381 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
LATILES SCAN
:ility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
,gram:. SF
Statesville, NC
,talion: MW11 /
dia: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19TS
D No: 19TS
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
SULTS
.SOU .sou .sou .sou
.SOU .sou .sou .sou
S.OU .sou
.SOUR
.SOU
.SOU .sou .sou .sou
S.OU .sou
.SOU
•.SOU ,.sou ,.sou
•.SOU
•.SOU ,.sou ,.sou
I.SOU
I.SOU
S.OU
I.SOU ,.sou ,.sou
l.34J
S.OU ,.sou
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE .
CARBON DISULFIDE·
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS o.sou
0.SOU o.sou o.sou o.sou o.sou o.sou
O.SOU
0.50U
0.SOU o.sou
0.SOUJ o.sou
~e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
------Production Date: 06/03/2002 07:49
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 16:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDS)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
value is known lo be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
icates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
iiiiil
nple 4381 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
iCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
:ilily:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
grarri:,,SF
Hation: MW11 /
jia: GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19TS
D No: 19TS
lULTS sou sou
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
1CHLOROMETHANE AND 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
e value. NA-not analyZed. NAl-interfere.nces. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
iiiillial ___ _
Production Date: 06/03/2002 07:49
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 16:00
Ending:
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
cates that data unusable: compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
liiiil
nple 4382 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
LATILES SCAN
:ility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
grani~-SF
Statesville, NC
aation: MW27S /
fa: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T6
D No: 19T6
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
lULTS
sou
.SOU
.SOU
.SOU
.SOU .sou
.SOU
.SOU
S.OU
.SOU
.SOUR
.SOU
.SOU .sou .sou .sou
S.OU
.SOU
.SOU .sou .sou .sou .sou .sou .sou .sou .sou .sou
S.OU
:SOU .sou
•.SOU
1.1
S.OU ,.sou
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE.
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS a.sou a.sou
0.S0U a.sou a.sou
O.SOU a.sou a.sou a.sou
O.SOU a.sou
O.S0UJ a.sou
Je value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 1 S:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDS)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOT AL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the mlnirtlum quantitation limit.
lcates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
nple 4382 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
!CELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
:ility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
,gram:. SF
,talion: MW27S /
dia:GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T6
D No: 19T6
,ULTS
.sou .sou
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
)CHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
liiill
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 1 S:00
Ending:
JB value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interterences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
value is known to be less th3n value given. L-aciual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
,icates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
liiiil
ople 4383 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
_ATILES SCAN
ility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
grarri>-SF
Statesville, NC
,tation: MW8 /
Jia:GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T7
D No: 19T7
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
,ULTS
sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou
i.OU sou
SOUR sou sou sou sou sou ;.au sou sou sou sou .sou .sou .sou sou .sou .sou .sou
5.0U .sou .sou .sou .sou
5.0U .sou
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE.
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-0\CHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1,1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-0\CHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TR\CHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou
0.SOU
O.SOU
O.SOUJ
0.SOU
e value. NA•not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: McConney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 17:40
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
. 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
value ls known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quanutation limit.
cates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampllng and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
11111
iilil
nple 4383 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
lCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
:ility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
grams.SF
,talion: MW8 I
dia:GROUNDWATER.
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T7
D No: 19T7
lULTS
.sou .sou
UNITS
UGIL
UGIL
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
lCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
ie value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
liiil iiiil-----Product1on Date: 06/03/2002 07:49
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04123/2002 17:40
Ending:
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
icates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
liiiiiii E~E-V s11! AT., G,--llilll liiliil liiil -.. -Production Date: 06/03/2002 07:49
nple 4384 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
LATILES SCAN
:ility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
1grami .. SF
Statesville, NC
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
,talion: MWSS /
dia: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19WO
D No: 19WO
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 1 S:00
Ending:
SULTS
.sou
.sou
.sou
.sou
.sou
.sou
.SOU
.SOU
S.OU
. SOU
.SOUR
.sou
.sou
.sou
•.SOU
,.sou
S.OU
•.SOU
·.SOU
•.SOU
,.sou
,.sou
,.sou
,.sou
,.sou
•.SOU
,.sou
I.SOU
S.OU
,.sou
I.SOU
,.sou
l.40J
S.OU
I.SOU
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE .
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1,1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS UNITS
a.sou UG/L
a.sou UG/L
a.sou UG/L
a.sou UG/L
a.sou UG/L
a.sou UG/L
a.sou UG/L
a.sou UG/L
O.SOU UG/L
a.sou uGJL
a.sou UG/L
O.SOUJ UG/L
0.50U UG/L
~e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interlerences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDS)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
icates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
liiiiil
nple 4384 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
,CELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
ility:_ FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
grarri:-.SF
;talion: MW5S /
jia: GROUNOWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W0
D No: 19WO
lULTS
50U
50U
l.5J
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
UNKNOWN COMPOUND
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
•CHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
EPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED
e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
iiiiiil ------Production Date: 06/03/2002 07:49
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 15:00
Ending:
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known lo be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
cates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessar; for verification.
Page 1 of 1
nple 4385 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
-A Tl LES SCAN
ility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
gram:_ SF
Statesville, NC
:tation: MW29 /
Jia: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W6
D No: 19W6
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: CEIMIC
iULTS
10U
10UJ
10U
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
4J
2J
10UJ
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
SJ
9J
10U
1J
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
6J
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
47
10U
10U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1,1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10UR
10U
e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
------liiil Production Date: 06/03/2002 07:49
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 17:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
,alue is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
:ates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
nple 4386 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
LATILES SCAN
:ility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
grani:-SF
Statesville, NC
Hation: IN01 I
dia: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X1
D No: 19X1
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
,ULTS sou .sou
.SOU
.SOU .sou
.SOU
3.2
22
S.0U .sou
.SOUR .sou .sou
.SOU
6.1
21
S.0J
3.1
1,81
,.S0UJ
l.37J
1.SQUJ ,.sou
3.9J
I.SQUJ
l,S0UJ
I.S0UJ
I.S0UJ
S.0U
I.S0UJ
I.S0UJ
i.S0UJ
130
S.0U
I.SOU
UNITS
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS a.sou a.sou
0.S0UJ
0.S0UJ
0.S0UJ a.sou
0.S0UJ
0.S0UJ a.sou a.sou a.sou
0.S0UJ a.sou
;e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estlmaled value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/2412002 1 S:30
Ending:
UNITS
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
l value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitatlon limit.
licates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
,,pie 4386 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
;CELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
ility:_ FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
grani:-.SF
;talion: IN01 I
Jia: GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X1
D No: 19X1
iULTS
50U
50U
19J
UNITS
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZNE
2 UNKNOWN COMPOUND
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
>CHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
tEPORTEO AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED
ie value. NA-not analyzed. NAHnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
llllilil ~duct1oh Date: os!fflooffl:49ai
Produced by: McConney, John
· Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 0412412002 15:30
Ending:
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
icates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
IL~MP~AL'9i liiil -
1ple 4387 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
.ATILES SCAN
lity:_ FCX, Inc: (Statesville Plant)
irani:-.SF
Statesville, NC
tation: EB01 I
lia:GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T9
D No: 19T9
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
ULTS
50U sou sou sou sou sou sou sou
i.0U sou
SOUR sou sou sou sou sou
i.0U sou sou sou sou sou sou sou
50U
50U
50U
50U
i.0U
1.4 sou sou
50U
i.0U
50U
UNITS
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE .
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS
0.S0U
0.50U
0.50U
0.50U
0.50U
0.50U
0.50U
0.50U
0.S0U
0.50U
0.50U
0.50UJ
0.50U
, value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value, N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: McConney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 0412412002 09:00
Ending:
UNITS
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
,alue is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
:ates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
1111
nple 4387 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
,CELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
;ility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
,grams SF
3tation: EB01 /
dia:GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T9
D No: 19T9
SULTS .sou
.SOU
3.5J
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
UNKNOWN COMPOUND
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
)CHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
iEPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED
Je value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-eslimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
liiil
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor: •
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 09:00
Ending:
: value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater thar1 value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
licates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
nple 4388 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
..A TILES SCAN
ility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
gram:-.SF
Statesville, NC
;talion: DUP02 /
jia:GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W2
D No: 19W2
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
iULTS sou sou sou sou sou sou
65 sou
49 sou
SOUR
.SOU
.SOU sou sou
7.6
5.0U
.SOU
.SOU .sou .sou
.SOU
.SOU
.SOU
.SOU
.SOU
.SOU
.SOU s.ou
.SOU
.SOU
.SOU
.37J
5.0U .sou
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS a.sou a.sou o.sou a.sou a.sou
O.SOU
0.SOU a.sou o.sou
O.SOU o.sou
O.SOUJ a.sou
1e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J.estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
---.. --·-Production Date: 06/03/2002 07:49
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDS)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
cates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis ts. necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
liiiil
nple 4388 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
;CELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
:ility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
gram:, SF
itation: DUP02 /
dia:GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W2
D No: 19W2
,ULTS .sou .sou
30J
UNITS
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
UNKNOWN COMPOUND
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
)CHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
lEPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED
~e value. NA•not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
liiiJ
Produced by: McConney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002
Ending:
value is known to be less then value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
licates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and teanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
1ple 4389 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
_ATILES SCAN
ility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
irani:,SF
Statesville, NC
talion: MW6D /
lia:GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W1
D No: 19W1
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
iULTS UNITS
SOU UG/L
SOU UG/L
50U UG/L
50U UG/L
50U UG/L
50U UG/L
58 UG/L
50U UG/L
38 UG/L
50U UG/L
SOUR UG/L
SOU UG/L
SOU UG/L
SOU UG/L
SOU UG/L
'.6 UG/L
i.OU UG/L
SOU UG/L
SOU UG/L
SOU UG/L
50U UG/L
SOU UG/L
SOU UG/L
SOU UG/L
SOU UG/L ·
SOU UG/L
SOU UG/L
SOU UG/L
5.0U UG/L
SOU UG/L
SOU UG/L
SOU UG/L
28J UG/L
5.0U UG/L
SOU UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE .
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE .
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS
0.SOU
0.50U
0.50U
O.SOU
0.SOU
0.50U
0.SOU
O.SOU
O.SOU
0.SOU
O.SOU
O.SOUJ
0.SOU
e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J..estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 12:09
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGiL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
Cates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
-pie 4389 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
:ELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
lity: . FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
iram' -SF
ation: MW6D /
ia: GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W1
D No: 19W1
ULTS UNITS ;au UG/L ;au UG/L
,5J UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
UNKNOWN COMPOUND
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
CHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
:PORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED
, value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 12:09
Ending:
,alue is known to be less·than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given, U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the mini~um quantitation limit.
:ates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
lliil
iple 4390 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
.A TILES SCAN
ility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Jram:-SF
Statesville, NC
talion: MW6S /
lia: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W3
D No: 19W3
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
,ULTS
sou sou
50U
50U
50U
50U
50U
50U
i.OU
50U
50UR
71J
50U
50U
50U
50U
5.0U
.50U .sou .sou
.50U
.50U .sou .sou .sou
.50U
.50U
.50U
S.OU .sou .sou .sou .sou
5.0U
.50U
UNITS
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE.
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS
0.50U a.sou
0.50U a.sou
0.50U a.sou
O.SOU a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou
0.50UJ
O.SOU
Je value. NA.not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/2412002 10:00
Ending:
UNITS
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitatlon limit.
icates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
L~M P iWNAL-.. pie 4390 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
:ELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
lily:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
1rani:,SF
:ation: MW6S /
ia:GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W3
D No: 19W3
ULTS UNITS ;ou UG/L ;ou UG/L
\OJ UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
UNKNOWN COMPOUND
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
CHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
::PORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB . IDS NOT VERIFIED
:t value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
-Produced by: McConney, John
. Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 10:00
Ending:
,atue is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
;ates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and re~nalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
1ple 4391 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
.ATILES SCAN
ility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
iram,. SF
Statesville, NC
talion: MW2S /
lia: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X2
D No: 19X2
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
;ULTS
sou sou sou sou sou sou sou sou ;.ou sou
SOUR sou sou sou sou sou
;.OU
42J sou
.SOU
.SOU
.SOU
.SOU .sou .sou .sou
.SOU
.SOU
S.OU .sou
.SOU .sou
.30J
S.OU
.SOU
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS
0.50U
O.SOU
0,50U
0.SOU
0.SOU
0.SOU
O.SOU
0.SOUJ
0.SOU
O.SOU
0.SOU
O.SOUJ
0.SOU
1e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-inlerferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
-~ducflo~ Date: os!fflooffl:49W · liiil
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 16:30
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
value is known to be less than value given, l-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
icates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
,pie 4391 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
CELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
ility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
irarri:,,SF
talion: MW25 /
lia:GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X2
D No: 19X2
iULTS
50U
50U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
I norg Contractor: LI BRTY
Org .Contractor: A4
tCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
1e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
-·-·-· ---Production Date: 06/W2002 07:49
Produced by: McConney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 16:30
Ending:
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
cates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysls is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
nple 4392 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
LATILES SCAN
,ility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
gram:. SF
Statesville, NC
aation: MW7 /
jia: GROUNOWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19WS
D No: 19WS
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
iULTS sou sou .sou
.SOU.
.SOU .sou
.SOU .sou
S.OU .sou
.SOUR .sou .sou .sou .sou .sou
S.OU .sou .sou
.SOU
.SOU .sou .sou
·.SOU ,.sou ,.sou . ,.sou ,.sou
S.OU ,.sou ,.sou ,.sou
I.SOU
S.OU
I.SOU
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L UG/L.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS a.sou
0.SOU a.sou a.sou
O.SOU a.sou a.sou
0.50U a.sou a.sou a.sou
0.50U a.sou
~e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J..estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
------Production Date: 06/03/2002 07:49
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 14:30
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDS)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-materia1 was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
licates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
liliJ
>le 4392 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
:ELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
ty: . FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
·am' --SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W5
D No: 19W5
1tion:MW7 /
a: GROUNDWATER
JLTS
OU
OU
6J
4JN
5JN
8JN
2JN
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
22 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS
1 H-INDENE, 2,3-DIHYDRO-1, 1,3
BENZENE, (1,3-DIMETHYL-2-BUT
NAPHTHALENE, 1,2,3.4-TETRAHY
NAPHTHALENE, 1-METHYL-
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
:HLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
:PORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 14:30
Ending:
1 value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J--estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. .
·alue is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit
:ates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
-.. - -
~ES SAMPLE ANALYSIS ------EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA 1111 -.. -.. --Production Date: 06/03/2002 07:49
,le 4393 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
._TILES SCAN
ity: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
ram:--SF
Statesville, NC
alien: FB01 /
a: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X3
D No: 19X3
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
JLTS
OU
OU
OU
,OU :ou :ou :ou :au
.OU :ou
,OUR :ou
i0U
i0U :ou
i0U
.OU
iOU
iOU
iOU
iOU
i0U
iOU
i0U
50U
50U
50U
50U :.ou
.9
50U sou sou :.au sou
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE .
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS
0.50U
0.50U
0.15J
0.76J
0.50U
0.50U
0.50U
0.50UJ
0.50U
0.50U
0.50U
0.50UJ
0.50U
, value, NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 15:15
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENE$
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
.1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1alue is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
;ates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampHng and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
liliJ
-1ple 4393 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
CELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
ilitv.: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
,rams SF
,tation: FB01 /
Jia: GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X3
D No: 19X3
;uL TS
sou sou
l.4J
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZNE
UNKNOWN COMPOUND
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
)CHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
lEPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB • IDS NOT VERIFIED
1e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
----.. -·-Production Date: 06/03/2002 07:49
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 1 S:1 S
Ending:
value is known to be less than value given. l-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
lcates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
pie 4394 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
ATILES SCAN
ity:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
rani:--SF
Statesville, NC
ation: PB01 /
a: GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X4
D No: 19X4
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
JLTS
,OU
,OU
,OU
i0U
i0U
i0U
i0U
i0U
.OU
i0U
i0UR ;ou ;ou ;ou
i0U
i0U
.OU ;ou ;ou ;ou ;ou ;ou ;ou
50U
50U
50U sou sou
i.0U
.7 sou sou sou
i.0U sou
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L ·
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE .
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS
0.50U
0.S0U a.sou
0.50U
0.S0U o.sou
0.S0U o.sou
0.50U
0.50U a.sou
0.S0U a.sou
e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 1S:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
,alue is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
:ates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
--,le 4394 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
:ELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
ity:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
ram:,,SF
ation: PB01 /
a: GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X4
D No: 19X4
JLTS UNITS
OU UG/L
OU UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
:HLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
1 value. NA•not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J--estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
.. Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 15:00
Ending:
·alue is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is kr'lown to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
:ates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and re.analysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
1ple 4395 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
..ATILES SCAN
ility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
gram~ SF
,tation: DUP03 /
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
Jia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19W7 Org Contractor: CEIMIC
,ULTS
10U
10U
10U
10UJ
10UJ
10U
4J
3J
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
SJ
BJ
10U
1J
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
6J
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
49
10U
10U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113) ACETONE . CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE) 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE) METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS
10U ,au
10U ,au ,au
10U
10U
10U ,au ,au
10U
10UR
10U
Je value. NA•not analyzed, NAl•interferences. J-eslimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: McConney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/e
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB) CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP) 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
icates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
,pie 4396 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
.ATILES SCAN
lily: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Iramc SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
lation: TB02 I
iia:GROUNDWATER D No: 19W8 Org Contractor: CEIMIC
ULTS
IOU
IOU
IOU
\OUJ
\OUJ
IOU
IOU ,ou
10U
10U
10U
10U ,ou
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
. UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE .
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10UR
10U
e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 17:30
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENE$
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitatlon limit.
eates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
,pie 4399 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
.ATILES SCAN
lily: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
1ramc SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
talion: TB01 /
lia: TRIP BLANK -WATER D No: 19W4 Org Contractor: A4
ULTS ;au ;au ;au sou sou sou sou sou
i.OU sou
SOUR sou sou sou sou sou ;.au sou sou sou sou sou .sou .sou .sou .sou
.SOU
.SOU
5.0U
.SOU .sou .sou .sou
S.OU .sou
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLOR0-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
RESULTS a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou a.sou
O.SOUJ a.sou
Je value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 1S:1S
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
icates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
1ple 4399 FY 2002 Project:
CELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
ility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
iram; SF
talion: TB01 /
lia:TRIP BLANK· WATER
02-0493
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
D No: 19W4
;ULTS sou sou
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
Org Contractor: A4
lCHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
Je value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J--estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
--.. - ---·-Production Date: 06/03/2002 07:49
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 1S:1S
Ending:
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
icates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
,pie 4400 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
.A TILES SCAN
ility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
iram~ SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
talion: TB03 /
lia:TRIP BLANK· WATER D No: 19W9 Org Contractor: A4
,ULTS
50U
50U
50U
50U
50U
50U
50U
50U
;.OU
50U
50UR
50U
50U
50U
50UJ
50U ;.ou
.50UJ
.50U
.50U
.50U
.50U
.50U
.50U
.50U
.50U
.50U
.50UJ
5.0U
.50U
.50UJ
.50UJ
.50U
5.0U
.50U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE
CHLOROMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
BROMOMETHANE
CHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (FREON 11)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1, 1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE (FREON 113)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
METHYL ACETATE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRANS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL T-BUTYL ETHER (MTBE)
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
CHLOROFORM
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CYCLOHEXANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE
1,2,DICHLOROETHANE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYLCYCLOHEXANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
.METHYL BUTYL KETONE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 17:35
Ending:
RES UL TS UNITS
0.50U UG/L
0.50U UG/L
0.50U UG/L
0.50U UG/L
0.50U UG/L
0.50U UG/L
0.50U UG/L
0.50U UG/L
0.50U UG/L
0.50U UG/L
0.50U UG/L
0.50U UG/L
0.50U UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2-DIBROMOETHANE (EDB)
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
TOTAL XYLENES
STYRENE
BROMOFORM
ISOPROPYLBENZENE
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
Je value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
icates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verification. ·
Page 1 of 1
-,pie 4400 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
CELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
ility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant}
gram~ SF
;talion: TB03 /
Jia:TRIP BLANK· WATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
D No: 19W9
iULTS
sou sou
l.6J
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE
c, 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
4 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS
Org Contractor: A4
)CHLOROMETHANE & 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE ARE TARGET ANAL YTES
!EPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED .
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 17:3S
Ending:
~e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interlerences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. .
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
licates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling·and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:;,'-"£0 ST,1,-~,5'
. ft . l~J .,.
"It PR~C,.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4
MEMORANDUM
Date: 06/03/2002
Science and Ecosystem Support Division
980 College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30605-2720
Subject: Results of PESTICIDES/PCB Sample Analysis
02-0493 FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Statesville, NC
From: Mcconney, John
To: Mallary, Ken
CC: Ralph McKeen
RACS/W
Thru: QA Office
.Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. If you have any
questions, please contact me.
I
I
I
.ATTACHMENT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Case Number: .1 Site ID.
Date:
I Affected Samples
VOA I 4378,4379,4381-
4384,4386-4394,
14399,4400
4378,4381-4385,
14387-4390,4399
4379
14380,4395,4396
14380,4385,4395,
4396
t380
!14381,4~84,4388,
IIB89 :-
14385
,385
1386
4386
I
I
I
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
30418
Project
Number 02-0493 . SAS Number NIA ------------
FCX. Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
5/24/02
Flag
Compound or Fraction Used
methyl acetate R
1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane J
1, 1-dichloroethane J
bromomethane, chloroethane J
1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane R
1, 1-dichloroethene, 1, 1-dicWoroethane, cis-1,2-J
dichloroethene, trichloroethene, xylene(total)
tetrachloroethene J
chloromethane, bromomethane, cWoroethane, J
trichlorofluoromethane, 1, 1-dicWoroethene,
1, l ,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane, acetone
1, 1-dichloroethene, 1, l ,2-trichloro-1,2,2-J
trifluoroethane, 1, 1-dichloroethane, cis-1,2-
dicWoroethene, chloroform, trichloroethene
carbon tetrachloride, tricWoroethene J
cyclohexane, benzene, trichloroethene, J
methylcyclohexane, 1,2-dichloropropane,
bromodicWoromethane, cis-1,3-dichloropropene,
toluene, trans-1,3-dichloropropene, I, 1,2-
trichloroethane, ethylbenzene, xylene(total),
styrene, isopropylbenzene, l, 1,2,2-
tetrachloroethane, 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
Reason
erratic initial & continuing
calibration relative response
factors
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
< quantitation limit
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
erratic initial & continuing
calibration relative response
factors
< quantitation•limit
< quantitation limit
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
I
I
I
I Case Number:
Site ID.
I Date:
I Affected Samples
4386
I
4390
14391
4391,4393
I
4393
14393
14395
,378,4384,4386
I
I
4378-4393
I
I
I
30418
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Project
Number
FCX. Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
5/24/02
Compound or Fraction
methylcyclohexane, 1,2-dibromo-3-
chloropropane
methylene chloride
chloroform, tetrachloroethene
1, 1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, 1,2-dibromo-3-
chloropropane
ethylbenzene
xylene(total)
1, 1-dichloroethene, 1, l ,2-trichloro-1,2,2-
trifluoroethane, 1, 1-dichloroethane, cis-1,2-
dichloroethene, chloroform, trichloroethene
1, 1-dichloroethane, bromochloromethane,
chloroform, cis-1,3-dichloropropene, 1, 1,2-
trichloroethane
2,4-dichlorophenol, hexachlorobutadiene,
caprolactam, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol, 2,4,6-
trichlorophenol, 2,4,5-trichlorophenol, 1,1 '-
biphenyl, dimethylphthalate, diethylphthalate,
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol, 1,2,4,5-
tetrachlorobenzene, pentachlorophenol, di-n-
butylphthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-octylphthalate
3,3'-dichlorobenzdine
02-0493 SAS Number NIA
Flag
Used
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Reason
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
contaminated storage blank
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
< quantitation limit
warning high in low
concentration PE sample
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
I
I
I
I Case Number:
I Site ID.
Date:
I Affected Samples
14379
I
4381,4385
14382
I
I
4387
I
4388
I
1389
I
I
I
I I
30418
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Project
Number 02-0493 SAS Number NIA
FCX. Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
5/24/02
Flag
Compound or Fraction Used
2,4-dichlorophenol, hexachlorobutadiene, 4-J
chloro-3-methylphenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol,
2,4,5-trichlorophenol, 4,6-dinitro-2-
methylphenol, 1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene,
pentachlorophenol, benzo(b )fluoranthene,
benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(a)pyrene,
indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene, dibenzo( a,h)anthracene,
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
caprolactam J
2,4-dichlorophenol, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol, . J
I, 1'-biphenyl, acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, 4,6-
dinitro-2-methylphenol, hexachlorobenzene,
atrazine, phenanthrene, anthracene,
benzo(b )fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene,
benzo(a)pyrene, indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene,
dibenzo( a,h )anthracene, benzo(g,h,i)perylene
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol J
2,4-dichlorophenol, hexachlorobutadiene, 4-J
chloro-3-methylphenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol,
2,4,5-trichlorophenol, 1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene,
pentachlorophenol
2-methylphenol, 4-methylphenol, 2,4-J
dimethylphenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, naphthalene,
hexachlorobutadiene, caprolactam, 4-chloro-3-
methylphenol, 2-methylnaphthalene, 2,4,6-
trichlorophenol, 2,4,5-trichlorophenol, 1,1 '-
biphenyl, 2-chloronaphthalene,
dimethylphthalate, acenaphthylene,
acenaphthene, diethylphthalate, 1,2,4,5-
tetrachlorobenzene, pentach!orophenol, di-n-
butylphthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-octylphthalate
Reason
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
I
I
I
I Case Number:
I Site ID.
Date:
I Affected Samples
4389
I 4390
I
I 4390
I 4391
I 4392
I
4393
14393 -:.
14394
I
IPEST
4378-4394,4397,
14398,4401
4378,4379
I ,
30418
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT-
Project
Number 02-0493
FCX. Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
5/24/02
Compound or Fraction
acetophenone
caprolactam, I, 1 '-biphenyl, dimethylphthalate,
diethylphthalate, 4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol, di-
n-butylphthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-octylphthalate,
atrazine
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol,
benzo(b )fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene,
benzo( a)pyrene, indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene,
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, benzo(g,h,i)perylene
2-nitroaniline, 3-nitroaniline, 2,4-dinitrophenol,
4-nitrophenol, 4-nitroaniline, 4,6-dinitro-2-
methylphenol
benzaldehyde
2-methylphenol, 4-methylphenol, 2,4-
dimethylphenol
naphthalene, caprolactam, 2-methylnaphthalene,
I, 1 '-biphenyl, 2-chloronaphthalene,
dimethylphthalate, acenaphthylene,
acenaphthene, diethylphthalate, di-n-
butylphtha]ate, butylbenzylphthalate, bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-octylphthalate
caprolactam, atrazine, 3,3'-dichlorobenzidine
methoxychlor
beta-BHC
Flag
Used
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
SAS Number NIA
Reason
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
< quantitation limit, erratic
initial calibration response
factor
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
erratic initial calibration
response factor
< quantitation limit
I
I
I
I Case Number:
I Site ID.
Date:
I Affected Samples
14379,4391
4381
14384
4392
14397
4401
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Project
304 I 8 Number 02-0493 SAS Number NIA
FCX. Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
5/24/02
Flag
Compound or Fraction Used Reason
heptachlor epoxide N difference in columns
all compounds J low surrogate recovery
endrin ketone N difference in columns
gamma-BHC J < quantitation limit
heptachlor epoxide, dieldrin, methoxychlor N difference in columns
alpha-BHC, dieldrin N difference in columns
1ple 4378 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
,TICIDES SCAN
ility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Jram:-.SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T1 tation: MW24 I
lia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T1
-ULTS
IOU
)BJ
10U
10U
10U
10U
39U
10U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
10UJ
20U
20U
10U
10U
I.OU
20U
40U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
UNITS
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4.4'-DDT (P,P'-DDD
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
a value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 0412312002 12:00
Ending:
1alue is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. ;ates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. 1ed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
,pie 4379 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
TICIDES SCAN
lily: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant}
Iram;,.SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T2 talion: DUP01 /
ia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T2
ULTS
IOU
)9J
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
15N
IOU
!OU
!OU
!OU
!OU wu·
!OU
!OU
IOUJ
20U
20U
10U
10U
.OU
20U
40U
20U
20U
20U
20U
20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE}
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA}
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE}
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA}
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD}
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDl)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) ·
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
, value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimaled value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: McConney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002
Ending:
·alue is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
:ates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
ed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
,le 4380 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
rlCIDES SCAN
ily:_ FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
ram~SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T4 ation: MW5D /
a: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T4
JLTS UNITS
0 UG/L
5 UG/L
8 UG/L
2 UG/L
2U UG/L
OU UG/L
OU UG/L
OU UG/L
OU UG/L
:OU UG/L :au UG/L :au UG/L :au UG/L :au UG/L :au UG/L
IOUJ UG/L
!OU UG/L
?OU UG/L
IOU UG/L
IOU UG/L
.OU UG/L
WU UG/L
IOU UG/L
?OU UG/L
WU UG/L
!OU UG/L
WU UG/L
WU UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: CEIMIC
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 16:30
Ending:
, value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
1alue is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
:ates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling an9 reanalysis ls necessary for verification.
1ed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane ~age 1 of 1
-ample 4381 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
ESTICIDES SCAN
acility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
rograms.SF
Statesville, NC
;/Station: MW11 /
edia:GROUNOWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T5
D No: 19T5
cSULTS UNITS
.010UJ UG/L
.010UJ UG/L
·.010UJ UG/L
•.010UJ UG/L
•.010UJ UG/L
1.010UJ UG/L
I.010J UG/L
I.01 OUJ UG/L
I.020UJ UG/L
I.020UJ UG/L
I.020UJ UG/L
I.020UJ UG/L
l.020UJ UG/L
I.020UJ UG/L
l.020UJ UG/L
0.10UJ UG/L
1.020UJ UG/L
l.020UJ UG/L
1.010UJ UG/L
l.010UJ UG/L
1.0UJ UG/L
0.20UJ UG/L
0.40UJ UG/L
0.20UJ UG/L
0.20UJ UG/L
0.20UJ UG/L
0.20UJ UG/L
0.20UJ UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4.4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4.4'-DDD (P.P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4.4'-DDT (P.P'-DDn
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
·age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J.estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 16:00
Ending:
al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantilation limit.
1dicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resamp1ing and reanalysis Is necessary for verification.
firmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
-ample 4382 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
ESTICIDES SCAN
acility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
rogram: .• SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T6 I/Station: MW27S I
ledia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T6
ESULTS
•.010U ,.01ou ,.o,ou
I,010U
l,010U
l.010U
l,010U
l,010U
l.020U
l.020U
l.020U
l.020U
l,020U
l,020U
I.020U
0.10UJ
l.020U
I.020U
l.010U
l.010U
1.0U
0.20U
0.40U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDl)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE 12
GAMMA-CHLORDANE 12
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
·age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: McConney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 15:00
Ending:
al value is known to be less than value given. L-aclual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
1dicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
firmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
ra.J:Sif9aAMIIIIIIIAN.talls --
,ample 4383 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
'ESTICIDES SCAN
'acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
•rogram~ SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T7 d/Station: MW8 /
Aedia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T7
:ESULTS
J.010U
).010U
).010U
).010U
).013
).010U
).010U
J.010U
).020U
).020U
).020U
).020U
J.020U
J.020U
J.020U
0.10UJ
0.020U
0.020U
0.010U
0.010U
1.0U
0.20U
0.40U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN.
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDn
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-inter1erences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 17:40
Ending:
1al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given, LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
firmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
ample 4384 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
ESTICIDES SCAN
~cility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
rograni;, SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W0 :/Station: MWSS I
edia:GROUNDWATER D No: 19W0
cSULTS
3.4
3.0
2.1
7.4
.010U
.010U
.010U
.010U
·.020U
.020U
•.020U
•.020U
,.02ou
,.02ou
•.020U
0.10UJ
3.4N
l.020U
l.010U
l,010U
1.0U
0.20U
0.40U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L ·
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDTI
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE 12
GAMMA-CHLORDANE 12
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) .
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: McConney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04123/2002 15:00
Ending:
al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
1dicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
irmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constiluents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
iiiil
-ample 4385 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
ESTICIDES SCAN
3cility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
rograni;_ SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W6 /Station: MW29 /
,edia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19W6
:SUL TS
.041
.010U
·.010U
•.038
•.010U
•.010U
1.1
,.01ou
l.020U
l.020U
l.020U
l.020U
l.020U
I.020U
J.020U
0.10UJ
1.052
J.020U
l.010U
l.010U
1.0U
0.20U
0.40U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDn
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: CEIMIC
·age value. NA•not analyzed. NAl-interferences. Jo-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: McConney, John
Requester:
Project Lead_er: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 17:00
Ending:
1al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
1dicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampllng and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
firmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1 1
-,mple 4386 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
:STICIOES SCAN
,cility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
ograni: .• SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X1
DNo: 19X1
'Station: IN01 /
adia: GROUNDWATER
:SUL TS
J.26
J.40
083
l 18
).01U
).01U
1.4
).01U
.034
.020U
.020U
.020U
.020U
.020U
.020U
D.10UJ
0.16
.020U
.010U
.010U
1.0U
0.20U
0.40U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT {P,P'-DDn
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 15:30
Ending:
al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
Idica1es that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification,
irmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
iiiil
1cllll;/P~M Piiili!NALliiilit; --1mple 4387 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
,STICIDES SCAN
1cility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
ograrri:-.SF
Statesville, NC
/Station: EB01 /
edia:GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T9
D No: 19T9
:SUL TS UNITS
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
. 020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
0.10UJ UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.40U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN .
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDn
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
1ge value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumplive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 09:00
Ending:
11 value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
dicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification .
. rmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
1aJs1PcJNhMFiMl.NAM!, -.. ample 4388 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
::STICIOES SCAN
acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
·ogramc,SF
Statesville, NC
/Station: OUP02 /
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W2
edia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19W2
:SUL TS
.010U
.010U
.016
.010U
.010U
.010U
.010U
.010U
.020U
.020U
.020U
.020U
.020U
.020U
·.020U
0.10UJ
•.020U
,.02ou
,.01ou
,.01ou
1.0U
0.20U
0.40U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P.P'·DDD
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRtN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254). PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
age value, NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002
Ending:
al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known lo be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitatfon HmiL 1dicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. irmed by gems·. 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
iiiil
11ple 4389 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
STICIDES SCAN
:ility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
,gram·: -SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W1 ,talion: MW6D /
dia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19W1
SULTS UNITS
l10U UG/L
l10U UG/L
l10U UG/L
l10U UG/L
l10U UG/L
l10U UG/L
l10U UG/L
l10U UG/L
l20U UG/L
l20U UG/L
nou uGtL
nou uGtL
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
1.1 0UJ UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
l.20U UG/L
l.40U UG/L
l.20U UG/L
l.20U UG/L
l.20U UG/L
l.20U UG/L
l.20U UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
. 4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDn
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
19e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interlerences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 12:09
Ending:
I value is known to be less than value given. L-actua1 valUe is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
jicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
rmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
liiiil
mple 4390 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
:STICIDES SCAN
cility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
ogram:-.SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W3.
D No: 19W3
·station: MW6S /
idia: GROUNDWATER
'SULTS UNITS
024 UG/L
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
3.0 UG/L
010U UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
).10UJ UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.40U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P.P'-DDD
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
ige value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interlerences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
l!BI llllplrocmon~: ~/2~7:~
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 10:00
Ending:
ii value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater th3n value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
-Oicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
irmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
1<WstP~M~NA--
,mple 4391 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
:STICIDES SCAN
1cility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
·ograrri:-.SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X2 /Station: MW25 I
edia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19X2
:SUL TS UNITS
.010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
.010U UGIL
.010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
0.76N UG/L
.010U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UGIL
0.10UJ UG/L
•.020U UG/L
1,020U UG/L
1.010U UG/L
1.010U UGIL
1.0U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.40U UGIL
0.20U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
· ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE}
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD}
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDn
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE 12
GAMMA-CHLORDANE 12
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/2412002 16:30
Ending:
al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material waS analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
ldicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
1rmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
-,mple 4392 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
:STICIDES SCAN
1cility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
ograni:-,SF
Statesville, NC
'Station: MW? /
edia:GROUNDWATER
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W5
D No: 19W5
:SUL TS
010U
010U
010U
).33J
.010U
.010U
13
.010U
.020U
.020U
.020U
.020U
.020U
.020U
.020U
0.10UJ
.020U
.020U
.010U
.010U
1.0U
0.20U
0.40U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4.4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4.4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE .
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 14:30
Ending:
al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-materia1 was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
1dicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampHng and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
irmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
C.-1PcwillMPlilliflNALJla ----R--..i ,_..o, ..-NS,. .. .,ro-onBe: cM,2cM1:., liiil
mple 4393 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
STICIDES SCAN
cility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
>gram: ,.SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X3 Station: FB01 /
,dia:GROUNDWATER. D No: 19X3
SULTS UNITS
J10U UG/L
D10U UG/L
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
J.10UJ UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
J.20U UG/L
).40U UG/L
J.20U UG/L
J.20U UG/L
J.20U UG/L
l.20U UG/L
J.20U UGIL
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT {P,P'-DDD
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE 12
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
1ge value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 15:15
Ending:
11 value ls known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
jicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
rmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
mple 4394 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
STICIOES SCAN
cility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
igram:,SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MO No: 19X4 Station: PB01 /
,dia: GROUNDWATER 0 No: 19X4
SULTS UNITS
)10U UG/L
)10U UG/L
)10U UG/L
J10U UG/L
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
l.10UJ UG/L
020U UG/L
020U UG/L
010U UG/L
010U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
l.20U UG/L
).40U UG/L
l.20U UG/L
l.20U UG/L
l.20U UG/L
l.20U UG/L
l20U UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIOE
ENOOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
OIELORIN
4,4'-00E (P,P'-OOE)
ENORIN
ENOOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-000 (P,P'-000)
ENOOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-00T (P,P'-DDD
METHOXYCHLOR
ENORIN KETONE
ENORIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
1ge value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 15:00
Ending:
11 value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
jicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
rmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
--Re-. 1vWn,AWNs.• ..
nple 4397 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
STICIDES SCAN
:ility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
1gram:._$F
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
,talion: MW1 /
dia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T3
SULTS
2.1
.31
.14
.96
l10U
l10U
3.2N
l10U
·.32N
l20U
l20U
l20U
l20U
l20U
l20U
>.10NJ
1.51 nou
010U
J10U
1.0U
I.20U
l.40U
I.20U
l.20U
l.20U
l.20U
l.20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDD
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
Org Contractor: A4
~e value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interlerences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: McConney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 16:30
Ending:
value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
icates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and· reanalysis is necessary for verification.
:ned by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
1mple 4398 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
:STICIDES SCAN
1cility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
·ogram~ SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
/Station: MW4 I
edia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T8
:SUL TS UNITS
.010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
.010U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
.020U UG/L
•.020U UG/L
•.020U UG/L
,.02ou UG/L
0.10UJ UG/L
I.020U UG/L
I.020U UG/L
,.01ou UG/L
I.010U UG/L
1.0U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.40U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.20U UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4.4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDn
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
Org Contractor: A4
·age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 17:30
Ending:
al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
,dicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
firmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 of 1
,mple 4401 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
:STICIDES SCAN
,cility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
ogram~ SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
'Station: MW2 /
adia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19XO
:SUL TS
017N
.060
.010U
.010U
.010U
.010U
0.47
.010U
.031N
.020U
,050
.020U
.020U
.020U
.020U
0.10UJ
1.0
,.02ou
l.010U
l.010U
1.0U
0.20U
0.40U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
0.20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA-BHC
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE)
HEPTACHLOR
ALDRIN
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA)
DIELDRIN
4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE)
ENDRIN
ENDOSULFAN II (BETA)
4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD)
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDn
METHOXYCHLOR
ENDRIN KETONE
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
GAMMA-CHlORDANE /2
TOXAPHENE
PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 15:00
Ending:
rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interlerences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
1al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimi.Jm quantitation limit.
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
firmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane Page 1 ot 1
I
I
::-,,i,tED Sr,4r~_, . ft . i~J
I \:,,_.#'
I
I MEMORANDUM
I Date: 06/03/2002
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4
Science and E_cosystem Support Division
980 College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30605-2720
DOCUMENTCO."fTRot NUMBER RJ;...)1'33-3A-
A-L-~..J Subject: Results of E CT ABLES Sample Analysis I 02-0493 FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Statesville, NC
I
I
I
I
From: Mcconney, John
To: Mallary, Ken
CC: Ralph McKeen
RACS/W
Thru: QA Office
cs
Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. If you have any
luestions, please contact me.
I
I
lnAcHMENT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Case Number:
.Site ID.
Date:
I Affected Samples
~
4378,4379,4381-
lf'384,4386-4394,
'4399,4400
14378,4381-4385,
387-4390,4399
4379
1380,4395,4396
1380,4385,4395,
396
,381,4384,4388,
389 _ -
1385
I
I
I
I
30418
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Project
Number
FCX. Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
5/24/02
02-0493
Flag
Compound or Fraction Used
methyl acetate R
1,2-dibromo-3-<:hloropropane J
1,1-dichloroethane J
bromomethane, chloroethane J
1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane R
I, 1-dichloroethene, I, 1-dichloroethane, cis-1,2-J
dichloroethene, trichloroethene, xylene(total)
tetrachloroethene J
chloromethane, bromomethane, chloroethane, J
trichlorofluoromethane, I, 1-dichloroethene,
I, I ,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane, acetone
I, 1-dichloroethene, I, I ,2-trichloro-1,2,2-J
trifluoroethane, I, 1-dichloroethane, cis-1,2-
dichloroethene, chloroform, trichloroethene
carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethene J
cyclohexane, benzene, trichloroethene, J
methylcyclohexane, 1,2-dichloropropane,
bromodichloromethane, cis-1,3-dichloropropene,
toluene, trans-1,3-dichloropropene, 1,1,2-
trichloroethane, ethylbenzene, xylene(total),
styrene, isopropylbenzene, 1,1,2,2-
tetrachloroethane, 1,2-dibromo-3-<:hloropropane
SAS Number NIA
Reason
erratic initial & continuing
calibration relative response
factors
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
< quantitation limit
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
erratic initial & continuing
calibration relative response
factors
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
a
0
I Case Number:
(Fite ID.
Date: u Affected Samples
lr386
r.390
ll391
,391,4393
if393
IJi393
1.395
loo
I
BNA
1378,4384,4386
I
I
178-4393
I
I
I
I
30418
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Project
Number
FCX. Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
5/24/02
Compound or Fraction
methylcyclohexane, 1,2-dibromo-3-
chloropropane
methylene chloride
chloroform, tetrachloroethene
I, 1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, 1,2-dibromo-3-
chloropropane
ethylbenzene
xylene(total)
I, 1-dichloroethene, 1,l ,2-trichloro-1,2,2-
trifluoroethane, I, 1-dichloroethane, cis-1,2-
dichloroethene, chloroform, trichloroethene
I, 1-dichloroethane, bromochloromethane,
chloroform, cis-1,3-dichloropropene, I, 1,2-
trichloroethane
2,4-dichlorophenol, hexachlorobutadiene,
caprolactam, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol, 2,4,6-
trichlorophenol, 2,4,5-trichlorophenol, I, l '-
biphenyl, dimethylphthalate, diethylphthalate,
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol, 1,2,4,5-
tetrachlorobenzene, pentachlorophenol, di-n-
butylphthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-octylphthalate
3,3'-dichlorobenzdine
02-0493 SAS Number NIA
Flag
Used
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Reason
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
contaminated storage blank
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
< quantitation limit
warning high in low
concentration PE sample
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
I
I
I
Case Number:
I Site ID.
Date:
I Affected Samples
14379
I
I
i4381,4385
"4382
I
I
1387
i388
I
I
I
I
I
30418
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Project
Number 02-0493 SAS Number NIA
FCX. Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
5/24/02
Flag
Compound or Fraction Used
2,4-dichlorophenol, hexachlorobutadiene, 4-J
chloro-3-methylphenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol,
2,4,5-trichlorophenol, 4,6-dinitro-2-
methylphenol, 1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene,
pentachlorophenol, benzo(b )fluoranthene,
benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(a)pyrene,
indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene, dibenzo( a,h)anthracene,
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
caprolactam J
2,4-dichlorophenol, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol, J
1, 1 '-biphenyl, acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, 4,6-
dinitro-2-methylphenol, hexachlorobenzene,
atrazine, phenanthrene, anthracene,
benzo(b )fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene,
benzo( a)pyrene, indeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene,
dibenzo{a,h)anthracene, benzo(g,h,i)perylene
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol J
2,4-dichlorophenol, hexachlorobutadiene, 4-J
chloro-3-methylphenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol,
2,4,5-trichlorophenol, 1,2, 4,5-tetrachlorobenzene,
pentachlorophenol
2-methylphenol, 4-methylphenol, 2,4-J
dimethylphenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, naphthalene,
hexachlorobutadiene,. caprolactam, 4-chloro-3-
methylphenol, 2-methylnaphthalene, 2,4,6-
trichlorophenol, 2,4,5-trichlorophenol, 1,1 '-
biphenyl, 2-chloronaphthalene,
dimethylphthalate, acenaphthylene,
acenaphthene, diethylphthalate, 1,2,4,5-
tetrachlorobenzene, pentachlorophenol, di-n-
butylphthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-octylphthalate
Reason
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterate.d monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated.monitoring
compound recovery
I
I
I Case Number:
.Site ID.
Date:
I Affected Samples
,389
4390
I
t390
I
1393
'!393
1394
I
I
4394
lsT
178-4394,4397,
98,4401
178,4379
}
I
30418
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Project
Number 02-0493 SAS Number NIA
FCX. Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
5/24/02
Flag
Compound or Fraction Used
acetophenone J
caprolactam, I, I '-biphenyl, dimethylphthalate, J
diethylphthalate, 4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol, di-
n-butylphthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-octylphthalate,
atrazine J
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol, J
benzo(b )fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene,
benzo(a)pyrene, indeno( I ,2,3-cd)pyrene,
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, benzo(g,h,i)perylene
2-nitroaniline, 3-nitroaniline, 2,4--dinitrophenol, J
4-nitrophenol, 4-nitroaniline, 4,6-dinitro-2-
methylphenol
benzaldehyde J
2-methylphenol, 4-methylphenol, 2,4-J
dimethylphenol
naphthalene, caprolactam, 2-methylnaphthalene, J
I, l '-biphenyl, 2-chloronaphthalene,
dimethylphthalate, acenaphthylene,
acenaphthene, diethylphthalate, di-n-
butylphthalate, butylbenzylphthalate, bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate, di-n-octylphthalate
caprolactam, atrazine, 3,3'--dichlorobenzidine J
methoxychlor J
beta-BHC J
Reason
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
< quantitation limit, erratic
initial calibration response
factor
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
< quantitation limit
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
low deuterated monitoring
compound recovery
erratic continuing
calibration response factor
erratic initial calibration
response factor
< quantitation limit
I
I
I Case Number:
.Site ID.
Date:
I Affected Samples
14379,4391
4381
t384
4392
fn97
4401
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
30418
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFJER REPORT
Project
Number
FCX. Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
5/24/02
Compound or Fraction
heptachlor epoxide
aJI compounds
endrin ketone
gamma-BHC
heptachlor epoxide, dieldrin, methoxychlor
alpha-BHC, dieldrin
02-0493 SAS Number NIA
Flag
Used Reason
N difference in columns
J low surrogate recovery
N difference in columns
J < quantitation limit
N difference in columns
N difference in columns
Sample 4378 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
EXTRACT ABLES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Programs.SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T1 Id/Station: MW24 I
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T1
~ESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5:0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ.
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
20UJ
5.0UJ
5.0U
20U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
20U
20U
UNITS
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
ACETOPHENONE
(3-ANDIOR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2.4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
20U
20UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
NA
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
7.6J
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
,rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 0412312002 12:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
0I-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALA TE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1.2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
ual value is known to be less than value given. l-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
ttiiiAt:iLIIIIJiA~ANWll)IS -.. -A -.-ON-.iESctllllJE~ -
Sample 4378 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: .• SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T1 Id/Station: MW24 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T1
tESULTS
5.0UJ
9.6JN
2.0JN
9.7J
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
CYCLOPENTENE, 1,2,3,4,5,-PENT
3.ALPHA., 11.ALPHA.-DIAMINO-P
3 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS
\ REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED
,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANAL YTE
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 12:00
Ending:
rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
1al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
liiil
·--AB-.aA~AN-1S -liill -A --IO~ES~-iE~ .. -Pr-tic""1ate.03-o'-R -
Sample 4379 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
EXTRACT ABLES SCAN
Facility:_ FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program;. SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T2 Id/Station: DUP01 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T2
,ESUL TS UNITS
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
20UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
20U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
20U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
20U UG/L
20U UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILJNE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002
Ending:
RESULTS UNITS
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
20U UG/L
20UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
NA UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U. UG/L
7.3 UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILJNE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
uage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
ual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
Indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
-At:l~A~ ANliil)llS -..,A--101'-a.!ES~E~A all
Sample 4379 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program;_ SF
Id/Station: DUP01 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS ANALYTE
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T2
D No: 19T2
5.0UJ UG/L
13JN UG/L
22J UG/L
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
CYCLOPENTENE, 1,2,3,4,5-PENT (2 ISOMERS)
6 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS
I,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANAL YTE
A REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002
Ending:
,rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
ual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification,
Page 1 of 1
Sample 4380 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
EXTRACTABLESSCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program; SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T4 Id/Station: MW5D I
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T4
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
20U
20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: CEIMIC
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
NA
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
87
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
erage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interlerences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 16:30
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L ·
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALA TE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
tual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis ls necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
1-IA8iilJSAl'llliii ANIIIJ51S -.-,A .-IOl96ES-HE~A -
Sample 4380 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility_: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program; SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T4
DNo: 19T4
Id/Station: MW5D /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS
5.0U UG/L.
15J UG/L
12JN UG/L
3.6JN UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2,4,5-TRICHLOROBENZENE
5 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS
CYCLOPENTENE, 1,2,3,4,5-PENT
OCTADECANOIC ACID, 2-METHYL-
1,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANALYTE A REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB • IDS NOT VERIFIED
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: CEIMIC
:1rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAJ-interferences. J-eslimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 16:30
Ending:
lual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
-AC...,A~AN-IS -
Sample 4381 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program~ SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T5 Id/Station: MW11 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T5
RES UL TS UNITS
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
1.0J UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
20U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
20U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
20U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
20U UG/L
20U UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
NA
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
1rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumpf1ve evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: McConney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 16:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALA TE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CO) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
ual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
..
r--AB..isAr.-ANaillts --Sample 4381 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility.: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program:, SF
Statesville, NC
Id/Station: MW11 /
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T5
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T5
RESULTS
5.0U
52J
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2,4,5-TRICHLOROBENZENE
3 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS
1,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANAL YTE A REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB • IDS NOT VERIFIED
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
erage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evlde,:ice of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 16:00
Ending:
lual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
,ample 4382 FY 2002 Project 02-0493
:XTRACT ABLES SCAN
'acility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
'rogram:-.SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T6 d/Station: MW27S /
~edia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T6
iESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
5.0UJ
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
20U
5.0UJ
20U
20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
20UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ u
5.0U
5.0U s.ou
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 15:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
6IS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
1al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-materiat was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
-Sample 4382 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program~ SF
Id/Station: MW27S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T6
D No: 19T6
~ESUL TS UNITS
5.0U UG/L
6.7J UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2,4,5-TRICHLOROBENZENE
2 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS
!,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANAL YTE 'A REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
srage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interlerences. J.estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 15:00
Ending:
tual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampllng and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
---------
,....o.._AM~N.._S --.aJA--ON..,SD-EN .... --Pr-tio~te:Wo3,.0~ -
,ample 4383 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
,XTRACTABLES SCAN
'acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
'rogram:_ SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T7 d/Station: MWS I
Aedia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T7
:ESULTS
s.ou s.ou s.ou
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5,0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
20U
20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE · 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1,1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U sou
20U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U u
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U s.ou
·age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interterences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester·.
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 17:40
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
. HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALA TE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
1at value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit. :-idicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
Sample 4383 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
..,ISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
=acility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
"rograriK. SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T7 Id/Station: MW8 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T7
lESUL TS UNITS
5.0U UG/L
10JN UG/L
820J UG/L
60JN UG/L
5.6JN UG/L
20JN UG/L
11JN UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2,4,5-TRICHLOROBENZENE
TRIDECANOIC ACID
10 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS
PHENOL, 4,4'-BUlYLIDENEBIS [2
ERUCYLAMIDE
1,2-BENZISOSELENAZOLE
9-OCTAOECENOIC ACID, (E) -
,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANAL YTE ~ REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
irage value. NA-not analyzed.' NAl-interferences. J..astimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 17:40
Ending:
ual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quanlitation limit.
indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
,ample 4384 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
:XTRACTABLES SCAN
'acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
'rogram: .• SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19WO
D No: 19WO
d/Station: MWSS I
Jedia: GROUNDWATER
:ESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
20UJ
5.0UJ
5.0U
20U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
20U
20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1,1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE·
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: L/BRTY
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
20U
20UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
NA
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
ge value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of p_resence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 15:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2.4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALA TE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
I value is known to be Jess than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
licates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
al
'------"'''lliir'',_,;, --,ample 4384 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
~ISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
'acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
'rograni;. SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W0
D No: 19W0
d/Station: MW5S /
i.1edia: GROUNDWATER
IESULTS
5.0UJ
2.3JN
2.3JN
4.8JN
7.0J
3.2JN
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
ANALYTE
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
.ALPHA.-LINDANE
CYCLOHEXANE, 1,2,3,4,5,6-HEX CYCLOHEXANE, 1,2,3,4,5,6-HEX
UNKNOWN COMPOUND
ENDRIN KETONE
;-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANAL YTE REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
11ge value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 15:00
Ending:
ii value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. dlcates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
Sample 4385 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
EXTRACT ABLES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Planl)
Program:. SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W6 Id/Station: MW29 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 19W6
~ESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
1.7J
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
20U
20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2 ,4-DIMETHYLPH ENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: CEIMIC
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
NA
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
17
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
-- -----Production Date: 06/03/2002 07:49
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 17:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
ATRAZINE .
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALA TE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
Jal value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
Sample 4385 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
MISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program~ SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W6 Id/Station: MW29 /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 19W6
~ESULTS
5.0U
230J
5.6JN
6.2JN
2.3JN
2.4JN
11JN
3.8JN
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2.4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
14 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS
BROMACIL
PHENOL, 4.4'·(1-METHYLETHYLI
OCTADECANAL
NONADECANE
1-EICOSANOL
PENTADECANE, 8-HEXYL-
I,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANALYTE
A REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: CEIMIC
,rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J•estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 17:00
Ending:
ual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
,ample 4386 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
,XTRACT ABLES SCAN
=acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
'rogram:. SF Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X1
d/Station: IN01 I
~edia:GROUNDWATER D No: 19X1
IESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
20UJ
5.0UJ
5.0U
20U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
20U
20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITRO BENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHEN!:
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
20U
20UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
NA
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-eslimated value. N-presumplive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 15:30
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALA TE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quanlitation limit.
1dicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
-,ample 4386 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
AISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
'acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
'rogram:, SF
d/Station: IN01 /
Aedia: GROUNDWATER
ANALYTE
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X1 ·
D No: 19X1
:ESULTS
5.0JN
330J
21JN
5.0U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
HEMANTHAMINE P-BROMOBENZOATE
2 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS
DODECANOIC ACID, 1,2,3-PROPA
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANALYTE
I REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
rage value. NA•not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: McConney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 15:30
Ending:
Jal value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation fimil.
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
R
,ample 4387 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
:XTRACTABLES SCAN
=acility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
>rogram:_ SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T9 d/Station: EB01 /
14edia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T9
tESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
20U
20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROtSOPROPYL) ETHER
ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
20UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
NA
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
irage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 09:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
0I-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
0I-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
ual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantilation limit.
indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
-:ample 4387 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
IISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
·acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
•rogram;_ SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T9 j/Station: EB01 /
1edia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T9
ESULTS UNITS
2.3JN UG/L
2.4JN UG/L
4.SJN UG/L
5.0U UG/L
10J UG/L
ANALYTE
ALPHA.-LINDANE
CYCLOHEXANE, 1,2,3,4,5,6-HEX
CYCLOHEXANE, 1,2,3,4,5,6-HEX
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
2 UNKNOWN COMPOUNOS
5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANALYTE
, REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
·age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
-Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 09:00
Ending:
1al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. re~ampling and reanalysis ls necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
.ample 4388 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
:XTRACT ABLES SCAN
acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
'rogram:_ SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W2 J/Station: DUP02 /
1edia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19W2
ESUL TS UNITS
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
3.0J UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
20UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
20U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
20U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
20U UG/L
20U UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
NA
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
37
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
rage value. NA.not analyzed. NAl-interlerences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
1al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
,ample 4388 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
!ISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
·acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
1rogram:-~SF
J/Station: DUP02 /
Aedia:GROUNDWATER
.ESUL TS UNITS ANALYTE
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W2
D No: 19W2
28J UG/L
5.7JN UG/L
2.1JN UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
6 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS
BENZENEMETHANOL, .ALPHA.,.AL
OXYBENZONE
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
\ REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB • IDS NOT VERIFIED
,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANAL YTE
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney; John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002
Ending:
1al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
;ample 4389 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
:XTRACT ABLES SCAN
'acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
'rogram: .• SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W1 J/Station: MW6D /
~edia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19W1
.ESULTS UNITS
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
3.3J UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
20UJ UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
20U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
20U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
20U UG/L
20U UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE:
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
20U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
NA
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
7.3J
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
1ge value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimaled value. N-presumptive evidence of pr8sence of material.
Produced by: McConney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 12:09
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
11 value is known to be less than value gtven. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. dicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
;ample 4389 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
~ISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
'acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
•rogram:-. SF
j/Station: MW6D /
~edia: GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W1
D No: 19W1
.ESULTS
5.0UJ
17J
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
5 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS
\ REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB -IDS NOT VERIFIED
,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANALYTE
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 12:09
Ending:
Jal value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resamplin9 and_ reanalysis is necessary for verification,
Page 1 of 1
ample 4390 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
XTRACTABLES SCAN
acility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
'rogram;, SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W3 j/Station: MW6S /
ledia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19W3
ESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
3.3J
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
ZOU
5.0UJ
5.0U
ZOU
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
ZOU
20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
ACETOPHENONE
(3-ANDIOR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LI BRTY
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
ZOU
20UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
1.8J
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
NA
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: McConney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 10:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
.ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
0I-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
8IS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
Jal value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
ample 4390 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
IISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
acility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
rograni;, SF
I/Station: MW6S /
ledia: GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W3
D No: 19W3
ESULTS
5.0U
28J
3.9JN
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
4 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS
BROMACIL
, REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED
5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANALYTE
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
-Produced by: McConney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 10:00
Ending:
·age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
1a1 value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
llllll
ample 4391 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
KTRACT ABLES SCAN
acility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant}
rogranLSF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X2 /Station: MW25 /
edia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19X2
:SUL TS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
20U
20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL} ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL} ETHER
ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL.
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE.
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 16:30
Ending:
RES UL TS UNITS
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
20U UG/L
20UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
NA UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALA TE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
:1ge value, NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
:11 value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected, the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
dicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary tor verification.
Page 1 of 1
(iiiiiif\BL;a;AMfiliiS\NAllll]S -~. ~N aalso,lililEN~
ample 4391 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
IISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
·rogram~ SF
l/Station: MW25 /
1edia: GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X2
D No: 19X2
ESULTS
5.0U
7.9J
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
UNKNOWN COMPOUND
, REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED
5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANAL YTE
lnorg Contractor:.LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
iiiil
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04124/2002 16:30
Ending:
age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
ldicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
iiiiiil
ample 4392 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
XTRACT ABLES SCAN
acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
rogram~ SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W5
D No: 19W5
I/Station: MW7 /
ledia: GROUNDWATER
ESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
20UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20UJ
5.0U
20UJ
20UJ
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE .
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20UJ
20UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
NA
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 14:30
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
1al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantilation limit.
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
11!!!!1
;ample 4392 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
~ISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
'acility.: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
'rograrn:. SF
ct/Station: MW7 I
Aedia: GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W5
D No: 19W5
:ESULTS
5.0U
200J
16JN
UNITS
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
· ANALYTE
1,2,4,5-TETRACLOROBENZENE
29 UNKNOWN COMPOUNDS
BROMACIL
\ REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB • IDS NOT VERIFIED
,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANAL YTE
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interlerences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 14:30
Ending:
Jal value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. Li-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantilation limit.
,ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
ample 4393 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
XTRACTABLES SCAN
acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
rogram:, SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X3 I/Station: FB01 /
ledia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19X3
ESULTS
2.1J
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
20U
20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
NA
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 15:15
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2.4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALA TE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
:age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
1al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material waS analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
ample 4393 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
IISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
rograril~ SF
I/Station: FB01 /
\edia: GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X3
D No: 19X3
ESUL TS UNITS
5.0U UG/L
9.3JN UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
BENZOPHENONE
, REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED
5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANALYTE
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value, N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 15:15
Ending:
1al value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
;ample 4394 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
:XTRACT ABLES SCAN
'acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
'rogram; SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X4 d/Station: PB01 /
Aedia: GROUNDWATER D No: 19X4
:ESULTS
3.5J
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
20U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0UJ
20U
5.0UJ
20U
20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
20U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
NA
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
uage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 15:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CO) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
:ual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
:ample 4394 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
IISCELLANEOUS COMPOUNDS
'acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
'rogram; SF
j/Station: PB01 I
Aedia: GROUNDWATER
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X4
D No: 19X4
:ESULTS
5.0U
4.3J
8.0JN
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE
UNKNOWN COMPOUND
BENZOPHENONE
.,_ REPORTED AS IDENTIFIED BY CLP LAB· IDS NOT VERIFIED
•,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE IS TARGET ANAL YTE
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
irage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: McConney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 0412412002 15:00
Ending:
ual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitatlon limit.
indi~tes that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
,_.,c,
MEMORANDUM
Date: 06/11/2002
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4
Science and Ecosystem Support Division
980 College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30605-2720
NT. CONTROL NUMBER~ 1~3 -?:...4
Subject: Results of EXTRACT ABLES Sample Analysis
02-0493 FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Statesville, NC
DOCUME AL-'=l""
From: Mcconney, John
To: Mallary, Ken
CC: Ralph McKeen
RACS/W
Thru: QA Office
Please substitute these results for those previously reported. If you have any questions, please contact me. I
I
I
tACHMENT
I
I
I
I
-liiiiiiil -. -~-~·-~,__.,., ---l'A llliJ310lilli)5ESliiilifHEiiiiil,A -liiiilil PMctillf'batP.lli11 A2 A alll.
Sample 4382 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program; SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T6 Id/Station: MW27S /
Media: GROUNDWATER D No: 19T6
RESULTS UNITS
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
20U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
20U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
20U UG/L
5.0UJ UG/L
20U UG/L
20U UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACT AM
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2.4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1, 1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
20UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
NA
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
5.0UJ
erage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: McConney, John
Requester:
Projecl Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 15:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALA TE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO·A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
tual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. : indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
Sample 4383 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program~ SF
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T7 Id/Station: MWB I
Media:GROUNDWATER D No: 19T7
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
5.0U
20U
20U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
· UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BENZALDEHYDE
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
ACETOPHENONE
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE .
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
CAPROLACTAM
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
1,1-BIPHENYL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
3-NITROANILINE
· ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
RESULTS
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
20U
20U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
NA
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0UJ
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
5.0U
erage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interlerences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Mcconney, John
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 17:40
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLUORENE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
ATRAZINE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE :
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE:
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
tual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-materia1 was analyzed tor but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
. indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
I
I
I
I
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region 4
Science and Ecosystem Support Division
980 College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30605-2720
I MEMORANDUM tfAY z 8 2002
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date: 05116/2002
Subject: Results of METALS Sample Analysis
02-0493 FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Statesville, NC
From: Goddard, Denise
To: Mallary, Ken
CC: Ralph McKeen
RACS/W
Thru: QA Office
DOCUMENT CONTROLNUMBE'tl}FyJ trs-}A;
-.AwJ
Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. If you have any f uestio.ns, please contact me.
I
J.nACHMENT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
Page 1 of 6
May 10, 2002
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT
Case Number:~3~0~4~1~8"--------------
Project Number:__,0~2~-~0~4.,_,,_9~3---,--------,----
Site: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
Sam:gle No. Element Flag Reason 4378 Al J Serial d.ilution percent difference = 14.S't As R Analyte reported as potential false positive Ba J Serial dilution percent difference = 12.S't Be u Baseline instability in cal, prep, and blind Cr J Serial dilution percent difference lS't Cu u Baseline instability in cal blanks
Fe J PE sample recovery > warning limit
Serial dilution percent difference = 14.9\ Mg J Serial dilution percent difference 13. 3't Mn J Serial dilution percent difference 13.4\ Ni J Serial dilution percent difference = 11. 6't Se J Matrix spike recovery= 56.1%
Tl J Matrix spike recovery = 37.G't
V R Analyte reported as potential false positive
4379 Al J Serial dilution percent difference 14. S't Ba J Serial dilution percent difference = 12.S't Be u Baseline instability in cal, prep, and blind Cr J Serial dilution percent difference lS't Cu u Baseline instability in cal blanks
Fe J PE sample recovery> warning limit
Serial dilution percent difference 14.9\ Mg J Serial dilutiOn percent difference 13.J't Mn J Serial dilution percent difference 13.H Hg UJ PE sample recovery > action limit
Baseline instability in blind blank Ni J Serial dilution percent difference 11.G't Se J Matrix spike recovery = 56.1%
Tl J Matrix spike recovery= 37.6\
V J Serial dilution percent difference lH
4380 Al UJ Serial dilution percent difference = 14 .st
Positives in cal blanks
As R Analyte reported as potential false positive Ba J Serial dilution percent difference = 12. 5 't Be u Baseline instability in cal, prep,· and blind Cr R Analyte reported as potential false positive cu u Baseline instability in cal blanks
Fe J PE sample recovery > warning limit
Serial dilution percent difference 14.9\
Mg J Serial dilution percent difference 13.H
Mn J Serial dilution percent difference = 13.H Ni R Analyte reported as potential false positive
Se J Matrix spike recovery= 56.1%
Tl J Matrix spike recovery= 37.6\
V J Serial dilution percent difference lH
blanks
blanks
blanks
I
I
Page 2 of 6
I May l.0, 2002 INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued)
I Case Number: 30-4~l.~8~~~-----------Project Number: 02-0493
Site: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
I Sam2le No. Element Flag Reason
4381 Al J Serial dilution percent difference 14. 5% Sb u Baseline instability in cal blanks
Ba J Serial dilution percent difference = 12.5% I Cr J Serial dilution percent difference 15% Fe J PE sample recovery > warning lirriit•
Serial dilution percent difference 14.9%
I Mg J Serial dilution percent difference 13. 3% Mn J Serial dilution percent difference 13 .4% Hg UJ PE sample recovery > action limit
Baseline instability in blind blank
I Ni J Serial dilution percent difference = 11. 6% Se R Analyte reported as potential false positive Tl J Matrix spike recovery = 37.6%
V J Serial dilution percent difference 14%
I 4382 Al J Serial dilution percent difference 14 .5% As R Analyte reported as potential false positive Ba J Serial dilution percent difference 12.5% I Be u Baseline instability in cal, prep, and blind Cr J Serial dilution percent difference 15% Fe J PE sample recovery > warning limit
Serial dilution percent difference 14.9% I Mg J Serial dilution percent difference = 13 .3%
Mn J Serial dilution percent difference = 13.4% Hg UJ PE sample recovery > action limit
I Baseline instability in blind blank Ni J Serial dilution· percent difference 11. 6% Se J Matrix spike recovery= 56.1%
Tl J Matrix spike recovery = 37.6%
I V J Serial dilution percent difference 14%
4383 Al J Serial dilution percent difference 14. 5% As J % RSD > 20% for ICP multiple exposures
I Ba J Serial dilution percent difference 12.5%
Be u Baseline instability in cal, prep, and blind Cr J Serial dilution percent difference 15% cu u Baseline instability in cal blanks I Fe J PE sample recovery > warning limit
Serial dilution percent difference 14.9% Mg J Serial dilution percent difference 13 .3% Mn J Serial dilution percent differerice 13.4% • Ni J Serial dilution percent difference = 11. 6% Se J Matrix spike recovery= 56. 1%
Tl J Matrix spike recovery= 37.6%
I V J Serial dilution percent difference 14%
I
I
blanks
blanks
I
I Page 3 of 6
I May 10, 2002
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued)
Case NUmber:~3~o~·4"1"-"8 _____________ _ I Project Number ,_,0,.,2:.:-:.,0~4,.,9'"3'-----------
Si te: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
I Sa!!!];!le No. Element Flag Reason
4384 Al J Serial dilution percent difference 14.5%
Ba J Serial dilution percent difference = 12.5%
Be u Baseline instability in cal, prep, and blind I Cr J Serial dilution percent difference 15%
Fe J PE sample recovery > warning limit·
Serial dilution percent difference = 14.9%
I Mg J Serial dilution percent difference 13. 3% Mn J Serial dilution percent difference 13 .4%
Hg UJ PE sample recovery > action limit
Baseline instability in blind blank
I Ni J Serial dilution percent difference = 11.6%
Se R Analyte reported as potential false positive
Na u Positive in prep blank
Tl J Matrix spike recovery= 37.6%
I V J Serial dilution percent difference 14%
4385 Al UJ Serial dilution percent difference 14 .5%
Positives in cal, prep, and blind blanks
I Sb u Baseline instability in cal blanks
Ba J Serial dilution percent difference = 12.5%
Be u Baseline instability in cal, prep, and blind
Cd R Analyte reported as potential false positive I Cr UJ Serial dilution percent difference 15%
Baseline instability in cal blanks cu u Baseline instability in cal blanks
I Fe J PE sample recovery > warning limit
· Serial dilution percent difference 14. 9% Pb R Analyte reported as potential false positive
Mg J Serial dilution percent difference 13. 3%
I Mn J Serial dilution percent difference 13.4%
Ni J Serial dilution percent difference 11.6%
Se J Matrix spike recovery= 56.1%
Tl J Matrix spike recovery= 37.6%
14386
V J Serial dilution percent difference 14%
Al J Serial dilution percent difference 14.5%
Ba J Serial dilution percent difference = 12.5% I Be u Baseline instability in cal, prep, and blind
Cr UJ Serial dilution percent difference 15%
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Fe J PE sample recovery> warning limit I Serial dilution percent difference 14. 9% Pb R Analyte reported as potential false positive
Mg J Serial dilution percent difference 13. 3%
I Mn J Serial dilution percent difference 13. 4%
Ni J Serial dilution percent difference 11. 6%
Se J Matrix spike recovery = 56.1%
Tl J Matrix spike recovery= 37.6%
I V J Serial dilution percent difference = 14%
I
blanks
blanks
blanks
I
I Page 4 of 6
I May 10, 2002
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued)
I Case Number,~3~0~4~1~8,,_ ____________ _
Project Number,~0~2~-~0~4~9=3 __________ _
Site: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
I SamQ:le No. Element Flag Reason
4387 Al J Serial dilution percent difference 14 .5%
Ba UJ Serial dilution percent difference 12.5%
Positives cal and blind blanks
I Cr J Serial dilution percent difference 15%
Cu u Baseline instability in cal blanks
Fe UJ PE sample recovery > warnin9 limit
I Serial dilution percent difference 14. 9%
Positive in blind blank
Mg J Serial dilution percent difference 13 .3%
Mn UJ Serial dilution percent difference 13 .4%
I Baseline instability in cal and blind banks
Ni J Serial dilution percent difference 11. 6%
K u Positives in cal and prep blanks
Se J Matrix spike recovery= 56.1%
I Na u Positive in prep blank
Tl J Matrix spike recovery = 37.6%
V J Serial dilution percent difference 14%
I 4388 Al UJ Serial dilution percent difference = 14 .5%
Positives in cal, prep, and blind blanks
Ba J Serial dilution percent difference = 12.5%
Be u Baseline instability in cal, prep, and blind blanks
I Cd R Analyte reported as potential false positive
Cr R Analyte reported as potential false positive
Cu u Baseline instability in cal blanks
I Fe J PE sample recovery > warning limit
Serial dilution percent difference = 14. 9%
Mg J Serial dilution percent difference = 13 .3%
Mn J Serial dilution percent difference = 13 .4%
I Ni R Analyte reported as potential false positive
Se J Matrix spike recovery= 56 .1%
Tl J Matrix spike recovery= 37.6%
V J Serial dilution percent difference 14%
I 4389 Al UJ Serial dilution percent difference 14.5%
Positives in cal, prep, and blind.blanks
Ba J Serial dilution percent difference = 12.5%
I Be u Baseline instability in cal, prep, and blind blanks
Cd R Analyte reported as potential false positive
Cr R Analyte reported as potential false positive
Cu u Baseline instability in cal blanks I Fe J PE sample recovery > warning limit
serial dilution percent difference = 14.9%
Mg J Serial dilution percent difference = 13.3%
I Mn J Serial dilution percent difference = 13.4%
Ni R Analyte reported as potential false positive
Se R Analyte reported as potential false positive
Tl J Matrix spike recovery= 37.6%
I V R Analyte reported as potential false positive
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 5 of 6
May 10, 2002
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued)
Case Number:--"3~0~4~1~8~-------------Project Number,_,0~2~-~0~4'.!.z:923 __________ _
Site: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
Sam11le No. Element Flag Reason
4390 Al J Serial dilution percent difference 14.5%
Ba J Serial dilution percent difference = 12.5%
Be u Baseline instability in cal, prep, and blind blanks
Cr J Serial dilution percent difference 15%
Cu u Baseline instability in cal blanks·
Fe J PE sample recovery > warning limit
Serial dilution percent difference 14. 9%
Mg J Serial dilution percent difference 13 .3%
Mn J Serial dilution percent difference = 13 .4%
Hg J PE sample recovery > action limit
Ni J Serial dilution percent difference 11.6%
Se J Matrix spike recovery= 56.1%
Tl J Matrix spike recovery= 37.6%
V J Serial dilution percent difference 14%
4391 Al J Serial dilution percent difference 14.5%
Ba J Serial dilution percent difference = 12.5%
Be u Baseline instability in cal, prep, and blind blanks
Cr J Serial dilution percent difference 15%
Fe J PE sample recovery > warning limit
Serial dilution percent difference 14. 9\
Mg J Serial dilution percent difference 13.3%
Mn J Serial dilution percent difference 13.4%
Hg UJ PE sample recovery > action limit
Baseline instability in blind blank
Ni J Serial dilution percent difference = 11.6%
Se J Matrix spike recovery = 56.1%
Tl J Matrix spike recovery= 37.6%
V J Serial dilution percent difference = 14%
4392 Al J Serial dilution percent difference = 14.5%
Ba J Serial dilution percent difference = 12.St
Be u Baseline instability in cal, prep, and blind blanks
Cr UJ Serial dilution percent difference = 15\
Baseline instability in cal blanks
Cu u Baseline instability in cal blanks
Fe J PE sample recovery > warning limit
Serial dilution percent difference = 14. 9%
Mg J Serial dilution percent difference = 13 .3%
Mn J Serial dilution percent difference = 13 .4%
Ni J Serial dilution percent difference = 11. 6\
Se J Matrix spike recovery= 56.1%
Tl J Matrix spike recovery= 37.6%
V J Serial dilution percent difference 14%
I
I
I
I
Page 6 of 6
May 10, 2002 INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued)
I Case NUmber:~3~0~4~1~8~-------------
Project NUmber:___,,0~2~-~0~4~9~3'------------Site: FCX, Inc. ·(Statesville Plant), Statesville, NC
I Sample No. Element 4393 Al
Ba I Cr
Fe
I Mg
Mn
Ni I Se
Na
Tl
I V
4394 Al
I As
Ba
Cr
Fe
I
Mg
Mn I Ni
Se
Na I Tl
V
I
I
I
I
I
I
Flag
UJ
J
J
UJ
J
UJ
J
J
u
J
J
Reason
Serial dilution percent difference= 14.5% Positives in cal, prep, and blind blanks Serial dilution percent difference= 12.5% Serial dilution percent difference= 15% PE sample recovery> warning limit• Serial dilution percent difference= 14.9% Positive in blind blank Serial dilution percent
Serial dilution percent Baseline instability in Serial dilution percent Matrix spike recovery=
Positive in prep blank Matrix spike recovery=
Serial dilution percent
difference
difference
cal and blind
difference
56.1%
37.6%
difference=
13.3%
13.4%
blanks
11.6%
14%
UJ Serial dilution percent difference 14.5% Positives in cal, prep, and blind blanks R Analyte reported as potential false positive J Serial dilution percent difference 12.5% J Serial dilution percent difference= 15% UJ PE sample recovery> warning limit Serial dilution percent difference 14.9%
J
UJ
J
J
u
J
J
Positive in blind blank Serial dilution percent Serial .dilution percent Baseline instability in Serial dilution percent Matrix spike recovery= Positive in prep blank Matrix spike recovery=
Serial dilution percent
difference=
difference=
cal and blind
difference=
56.1%
37 .6%
difference=
13.3%
13.4%
blanks
11.6%
14%
-Sample 4377 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program~ SF
Id/Station: MDRS01 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RES UL TS UNITS
53 UG/L
1.6U UG/L 4.2U UG/L
0.13 UG/L
0.31 UG/L
0.30U UG/L
17U .UG/L a.sou UG/L 0.60U UG/L
0.70U UG/L 14 UG/L
1.3U UG/L
12U UG/L
0.36 UG/L
0.14 UG/L a.sou UGJL
13U UG/L
2.2U UG/L
0.70U UG/L
1SOU UG/L
3.3U UG/L a.sou UGJL
1.4U UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
-~IDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19TO lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
rage value. NA•not analyzed. NAl•lnterferences. J--estlmated value. N.presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/18/2002 12:00
Ending:
Jal value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value 18 known to be greater than value given. U-materlal was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
--Sample 4378 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program:,SF
Statesville, NC
Id/Station: MW24 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS
620J
1.6U
9.3R
26
0.43U
0.30U
23000
14J
0.60U
3.5U
1000J
1.3U
5500J
120J
0.10U
4.0J
3100
2.2UJ
0.70U
9100
3.3UJ
1.5R
23
NA
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
llDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T1
D No: 19T1
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
·age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 12:00
Ending:
al value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U.n,aterial was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitatlon limit. 1dlcates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
iiil
-Sample 4379 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Programc SF
Id/Station: DUP01 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS
630J UG/L
1.6U UG/L
4.2U UG/L
28J UG/L
0.42U UG/L
0.30U UG/L
25000 UG/L
15J UG/L
0.60U UG/L
3.8U UG/L
1000J UG/L
1.3U UG/L
5900J UG/L
130J UG/L
0.11UJ UG/L
4.3J UG/L
3400 UG/L
2.2UJ UG/L
0.70U UG/L
9800 UG/L
3.3UJ UG/L
1.8J UG/L
20 UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL .
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
\NIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T2
D No: 19T2
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
erage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002
Ending:
tual value Is known to be leas than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitatlon limit.
: Indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
Sample 4380 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Programs SF
Id/Station: MW5D /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS
120UJ UG/L
1.6U UG/L
4.4R UG/L
29J UG/L
0.31U UG/L
0.30U UG/L
27000 UG/L
0.93R UG/L
0.60U UG/L
0.70U UG/L
100J UG/L
1.3U UG/L
SO00J UG/L
44J UG/L
0.10U UG/L
1.2R UG/L
2900 UG/L
2.2UJ UG/L
0.70U UG/L
11000 UG/L
3.3UJ UG/L
0.S0UJ UG/L
1.4U UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
INIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T4
D No: 19T4
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: CEIMIC
erage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J--estlmated value·. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 16:30
Ending:
tual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-materlal was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. : Indicates that data unusable, compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
".@!!!!liAMm!IAN,e;;alS liiiiiil liiiiil -lii&A -lliiONiiilil:S~EN..... --PrMbtid,! bate!111!!1!hs1"'21f!if!l iiil
Sample 4381 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program:. SF
Id/Station: MW11 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
~ESULTS UNITS
34000J UG/L
1.8U UG/L
4.2U UG/L
720J UG/L
6.5 UG/L
0.30U UG/L
6900 UG/L
95J UG/L
34 UG/L
92 UG/L
79000J UG/L
42 UG/L
12000J UG/L
1900J UG/L
0.18UJ UG/L
41J UG/L
7900 UG/L
2.5R UG/L
0.70U UG/L
12000 UG/L
3.3UJ UG/L
200J UG/L
250 UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
NIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T5
D No: 19T5
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
,rage value. NA•not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumpUve evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 16:00
Ending:
ual value Is known to be lesa than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value gtven. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
Indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
r.lllitAi';lallANallS ll!ml 1111
~ample 4382 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program:, SF
Statesville, NC
Id/Station: MW27S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
~ESULTS UNITS
43000J UG/L
1.6U UG/L
6.0R UG/L
940J UG/L
4.2U UG/L
0.30U UG/L
2000 UG/L
97J UG/L
88 UG/L
130 UG/L
82000J UG/L
26 UG/L
24000J UG/L
3000J UG/L
0.13UJ UG/L
110J UG/L
21000 UG/L
2.2UJ UG/L
0.70U UG/L
7500 UG/L
3.3UJ UG/L
110J UG/L
350 UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
NIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T6
D No: 19T6
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
!lrage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J--estimated value. N;,resumptlve evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 15:00
Ending:
tual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitatlon limit.
Indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampllng and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
--A ... 1otliiiiiiesd, Iii LE-A ..
Sample 4383 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493 Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requeslor: METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program~ SF
Id/Station: MW8 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS
3300J UG/L
1.6U UG/L
14J UG/L
63J UG/L
0.84U UG/L
0.30U UG/L
1400 UG/L
36J UG/L
3.4 UG/L
11U UG/L
8200J UG/L
3.0 UG/L
2000J UG/L
110J UG/L
0.10U UG/L
13J UG/L
1600U UG/L
2.2UJ UG/L
0.70U UG/L
1100U UG/L
3.3UJ UG/L
20J UG/L
50 UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
NIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19TT
D No: 19TT
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 17:40
Ending:
arage value. NA.not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptiv8 evidence of presence of material.
tual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitatlon limit.
indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
iiil
-Sample 4384 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program~ SF
Id/Station: MW5S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
~ESULTS UNITS
16000J UG/L
1.6U UG/L
4.2U UG/L
340J UG/L
1.5U UG/L
0.30U UG/L
2000 UG/L
68J UG/L
24 UG/L
55 UG/L
47000J UG/L
16 UG/L
10000J UG/L
1000J UG/L
0.10UJ UG/L
59J UG/L
9700 UG/L
2.3R UG/L
0.70U UG/L
3700U UG/L
3.3UJ UG/L
65J UG/L
110 UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
~JOE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W0
D No: 19W0
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
1rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J--estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/23/2002 15:00
Ending:
ual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-materlal was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. Indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
liiiil
lllfA -18110r-illilES~Et-llllliA -
Sample 4385 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program:, SF
Id/Station: MW29 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
RESULTS UNITS
92UJ UG/l
1.9U UG/l
4.2U UG/L
73J UG/l
0.24U UG/l
0.60R UG/L
4900 UG/L
1.6UJ UG/L
0.60U UG/l
2.2U UG/L
110J UG/l
1.6R UG/l
3400J UG/l
16J UG/l
0.10U UG/l
2.6J UG/l
2200 UG/l
2.2UJ UG/L
0.70U UG/L
13000 UG/L
3.3UJ UG/L
0.58J UG/L
32 UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
IIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MO No: 19W6
D No: 19W6
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: CEIMIC
age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumpllve evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 17:00
Ending:
al value Is known to be less then value given. l-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minlmum quantitation limit. 1dicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
liiil
Sample 4386 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program~ SF
Id/Station: IN01 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
~ESULTS UNITS
250J UG/L
1.6U UG/L
4.2U UG/L
86J UG/L
0.30U UG/L
0.30U UG/L
4300 UG/L
1.6UJ UG/L
0.90 UG/L
32 UG/L
380J UG/L
2.0R UG/L
3700J UG/L
42J UG/L
0.10U UG/L
1.9J UG/L
1600 UG/L
2.2UJ UG/L
0.70U UG/L
11000 UG/L
3.3UJ UG/L
0.88R UG/L
18 UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
~IDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X1
D No: 19X1
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 15:30
Ending:
rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
Jal value ls known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit.
indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reBnalysls is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
liii.i
,.._,AMl!IIIANJIIIIIS --,ample 4387 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
IIET ALS SCAN
'acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
'rogramc SF
d/Station: EB01 /
\ledia: GROUNDWATER
tESULTS UNITS
40UJ UG/L
1.6U UG/L
4.2U UG/L
0.32UJ UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.30U UG/L
17U UG/L
0.50UJ UG/L
0.60IJ' UG/L
1.4U UG/L
22UJ UG/L
1.3U UG/L
12UJ UG/L
1.2UJ UG/L
0.10U UG/L
0.50UJ UG/L
21U UG/L
2.2UJ UG/L
0.70U UG/L
600U UG/L
3.3UJ UG/L
0.50UJ UG/L
16 UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
-IIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19T9
D No: 19T9
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
rage value. NA•not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J--estlmated value. N•presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 09:00
Ending:
Jal value ls known to be less than value given. l•actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. ndlcates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysls Is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
,ample 4388 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
nETALS SCAN
'acility:. FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
'rogram:·-SF
d/Station: DUP02 /
nedia: GROUNDWATER
:ESULTS UNITS
78UJ UG/L
1.6U UG/L
4.2U UG/L
9.9J UG/L
0.26U UG/L
0.63R UG/L
4300 UG/L
0.89R UG/L
0.60U UG/L
2.8U UG/L
440J UG/L
1.3U UG/L
1400J UG/L
140J UG/L
0.10U UG/L
2.0R UG/L
1200U UG/L
2.2UJ UG/L
0.70U UG/L
6100 UG/L
3.3UJ UG/L a.sou UG/L
49 UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
IIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W2
D No: 19W2
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
rage value. NA•not analyzed. NAl•interferences. Jo.estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002
Ending:
Jal value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value ls known to be greater than value gtven. U-materlal was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitatlon limlt.
ndleates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
..... AMIB!ANJlll!!IS lllill
_Sample 4389 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
"1ETALS SCAN
=acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
0 rogram~ SF
d/Station: MW6D /
vledia: GROUNDWATER
IESUL TS UNITS
85UJ UG/L
1.6U UG/L
4.2U UG/L
11J UG/L
0.30U UG/L
0.44R UG/L
4400 UG/L
0.64R UG/L
0.60U UG/L
1.5U UG/L
460J UG/L
1.3U UG/L
1500J UG/L
140J UG/L
0.10U UG/L
1.4R UG/L
1100 UG/L
2.6R UG/L
0.70U UG/L
6200 UG/L
3.3UJ UG/L
0.56R UG/L
34 UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
•IDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W1
D No: 19W1
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 12:09
Ending:
rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Jal value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number Is the minimum quantitation limit.
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampllng and ~eanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
Sample 4390 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program: SF
Id/Station: MW6S /
Media: GROUNDWATER
~ESULTS UNITS
5000J UG/L
1.6U UG/L
4.2U UG/L
170J UG/L
0.61U UG/L
0.30U UG/L
110 UG/L
15J UG/L
14 UG/L
14U UG/L
12000J UG/L
9.9 UG/L
2800J UG/L
500J UG/L
0.40J UG/L
13J UG/L
2900 UG/L
2.2UJ UG/L
0.70U UG/L
17000 UG/L
3.3UJ UG/L
16J UG/L
47 UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
~IDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W3
D No: 19W3
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 10:00
Ending:
rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Jal value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-materlal was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
iiiiil
. ~AIVBI AN-IS -liliiil
Sample 4391 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Programs SF
Statesville, NC
Id/Station: MW25 I
Media: GROUNDWATER
{ESUL TS UNITS
!4000J UG/L
1.6U UGIL
4.2U UG/L
530J UG/L
3.1U UGIL
0.30U UG/L
1200 UGIL 170J UG/L
60 UGIL
150 UG/L 18000J UGIL
21 UG/L 3600J UGIL
1700J UG/L
0.11UJ UG/L
29J UGIL
2600 UG/L 2.2UJ UGIL
0.70U UG/L
6600 UG/L
3.3UJ UGIL
210J UG/L
77 UGIL
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
"COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
'IIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X2
D No: 19X2
lnorg Contractor: L/BRTY
Org Contractor. A4
rage value. NA.not analyzed. NAJ.interferences. J--estlmated value. N•presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requestor:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 16:30
Ending:
Jal value Is known to be less than value giyen. l•actual value ls known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitatlon limit.
ndicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis ls necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1 -
iiiil
.... AMilaAN ..... IS l!!I!
,ample 4392 . FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
AETALS SCAN
'acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
'rogram;_ SF
cl/Station: MW7 /
Aedia: GROUNDWATER
:ESULTS UNITS
1200J UG/L
1.6U UG/L
4.2U UG/L
270J UG/L
0.86U UG/L
0.30U UG/L
540 UG/L
6.8UJ UG/L
15 UG/L
9.5U UG/L
2600J UG/L
2.7 UG/L
4200J UG/L
280J UG/L
0.10U UG/L
15J UG/L
2500 UG/L
2.2UJ UG/L
0.70U UG/L
·0000 UG/L
3.3UJ UG/L
2.8J UG/L
74 UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
IIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19W5
D No: 19W5
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 14:30
Ending:
age value. NA-not analyzed. NAl•lnterferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of material.
al value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quanlitation limit.
1dlcates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
iiiil
,ample 4393 FY 2002 Project: 02-0493
\1ETALS SCAN
=acility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
0rogramc SF
d/Station: FB01 /
\1edia: GROUNDWATER
tESULTS UNITS
38UJ UG/L
1.6U UG/L
4.2U UG/L
0.10UJ UG/L
0.20U UG/L
0.30U UG/L
17U UG/L
O,SOUJ UG/L
0.60U UG/L
0.70U UG/L
14UJ UG/L
1.3U UG/L
12UJ UG/L
0.30UJ UG/L
0.10U UG/L
0.50UJ UG/L
13U . UG/L
2.2UJ UG/L
0.70U UG/L
210U UG/L
3.3UJ UG/L
0.50UJ UG/L
1.4U UG/L
NA UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON.
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
~IDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X3
D No: 19X3
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Contractor: A4
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 15:15
Ending:
rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
J&I value la known to be less than value given. L-actual value Is known to be greater than value given. U-materlal was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
ndleates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampllng and reanalysis Is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
iiiil
Sample -~~.:.;--'rr'-'=2002 Project: 02-0493
METALS SCAN
Facility: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)
Program;, SF
Id/Station: PB01 /
Media: GROUNDWATER
~ESULTS
23UJ
1.6U
4.7R
0.10UJ
0.20U
0.30U
17U
0.50UJ
0.60U
0.70U
17UJ
1.3U
12UJ
0.45UJ
0.10U
O.SOUJ
13U
2.2UJ
0.70U
280U
3.3UJ
0.50UJ
1.4U
NA
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
TOTAL MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
NIDE ANALYSIS NOT REQUESTED
Statesville, NC
Case No: 30418
MD No: 19X4
D No: 19X4
lnorg Contractor: LIBRTY
Org Coniractor: A4
,rage value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-lnterferences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptlve evidence of presence of materl_aL
Produced by: Goddard, Denise
Requester:
Project Leader: KMALLARY
Beginning: 04/24/2002 15:00
Ending:
ual value Is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantltation limit.
indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
Page 1 of 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIXF
TREND ANALYSES CHARTS
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I
I
liiiiil ---l!!!l!!I -----liiiil --.. .. --iiill liiil Pesticide Trends in MW-I 3.500 - . . .. -·· . --· --·-. ~ -l 'an 3.000 ---•· 2.500 2-2.000 1 ----==· ..:.-:...,,,; C 0 ~ ~ -,. ~ 1.500 C 0 u 1.000 -i ----• ___ -==!,._-___ .:._ ·_ 0.500 -i----~~ 0.000 0 0 C. 0. < 0 0 ' C ::, ~ 0 0 ' oI) ::, < • .<. _, -1 ----. --==-=----=--=-=-=· -~ _ __.__=---=----~ -~-~ -------=·•-:---::.·_-=...i:;-='::·,;;;· 0 0 ' u 0 0 0 ' (.) 0.) 0 0 ' ..D Cl µ.., :,tt _ __,,_ ..:,---=-::· 0 0 ' ' B.. C ::, < ~ Sample Date 0 OJ) ::, < 0 ' u 0 0 ' u " 0 ., ·,:, /J •. ~...! N 0 ' ..D <l) µ.., N 0 C. 0. < --Alpha-BHC -o-Beta-BHC Dieldrin , . .., --Gamma-BHC (Lindane) -o-Heptachlor Epoxide
- ------.. - -
Pesticide Trends in MW-2
0.500 ' --,.-". ---.--,,.--,-.-; - . .., .... -7.;
0 .400 -r·-·--""· ~=-'='· ~~s,,~-~ss·~~----~."s-. ~--""· ·=·===-·e,e·=· -'=-"=-"'="-="··-==-=-· -='-c-.s=, s.a. __ as,· cc-see--aca·=·=-"'"'·=-:.:~;;...,..~. =·-· eec.~.ces..··=-.--ea,-.<e_-_=-~-"":c';-':: .=e;,=-,a._.-_es=.I
-,'>.•.•••a••,;;''(:, •• ,-• • •••• > ,•'t•;' f ,-
3 . •·'""
-~9!' 0.1 00 1:-:::-=~=~:::::~:=-=:-:-:·-:· ::-:::::-:-~-=-~:·:·~~~:;·-;;;:;-~:;-~;;--~;,::-::;-r~;:~~-;:;-;g·;;· ~-;::-~----,J .---. , --_---------------r---~ . :---c-=~,,.,,....---: ·_ ,: -~ .... "' . -:=:-: .... :· ,~--:-q '' --~=-----:--··...:~_~--:-~:..:--~ _ _;__~_-_. ~ -· -_,:;:_-:;-1
" 0
-:c:__ 0.250 -l-~~~-:ce,c_:=~e:-ae_-~-c-e·-'=·~--~-~-~-=cec"~-'=. =-='-"=--~-=-'-~--~-"=-=". c-S=---='--e==S='='~--="b-a~~===='=~""'-=· °"'-~-::.'::'. ' . '. , '
~ /! j ."!. ••
'1)
<..)
§ u
0 000
0 0 ' ,...
0. <
0 0
' " ::,
~
0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' bi) ti ::, < 0
<..) V 0
0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' .D ,... " bi) ti '1) 0. ::, ::, LL. < ~ < 0
Sample Date
N N 0 0 0 ' ' ' <..) .D ,...
'1) '-' 0.
0 LL. <
Bil liiliil lliiil
-Alpha-BHC
---Beta-BHC
-<)--Heptachlor Epoxide
--
8.00
6.00
5.00
;,; 4.00
'--C
(I) u s u
2.00
1.00
-----.. -.. - -
Pesticide trends in MW-5S
--·~~ . - • ' • '. • . ' ., ._.., . ' i
. . I
_____ :J ------, ............. __ _._______· __ . __ __.__· ___ , ------·-------------------1
I
I -----------.. -_.'.... ..:__· _,_ --__j
-. ' . . . . . . ' ~ -
----. ---' -------y ------~ -~-
. . . ~
• J"
.,,,.. --
"'-~¾~--~=3/~cs'""ce-o-'.-=.=a-=-=-"'--s=s-=c...es-c:-e,;::sa-aa_,s_;e,,_s== --=---~--~_.:__=-::._-_=._-_-_=:-_-_-_____ ___;_-~-~ :_.··-~---'..
0.00 -.. --__ ·: ---:_, ___ :'__ "-----· ---~---
0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '-C 00 0 u .0 '-C 00 0 u .0 '-0. :, :, V ,;-' 0. :, :, <1) V 0. < ~ < 0 0 < ~ < 0 0 "-<
Sample Dates
-llii}
-+-Alpha-BHC
Beta-BHC
---Jl(---Gamma-BHC (Lindane)
liill liiii iiiil -liilll -..
4.50
(
'
4.00
3.50
~ 3.00
....) -01)
::,
~ 2.50 8
cl ~
~ 2.00
(.)
C: ' 0 u 1.50
1.00 L'
0.50
0.00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ~ C: 01) u (.) 0. ::, ::, '1) <( ~ <( 0 0
--.. ..,
Pesticide Trends in MW-5D
~'~-------~-· ~-
-------------
0 0 0 ' ' ' .D ~ C: " 0. ::, LL. <( ~
Sample Dates
0 ' 01) ::,
<(
..
0 ' u 0
0 ' (.)
" 0
N
0 ' .D <l)
LL.
.. tiilil
--Alpha-BHC
Beta-BHC
---¼-Gamma-BHC (Lindane)
liiiil
C 0
liilil'I
1.20
1.00
0.80
-~ 0.60
5
0 ~ 0 u 0.40
0.20
0.00
I.
I:
i '-
0 0 ' '-a. <(
iiiil liiiJ
---'------'-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' C OJj u 0
;:J ;:J C)
~ <( 0 Q
--=i
Pesticde Trends in W-29
< ~ ••
' . . \. ~,. ·L - , -· •.-.. .··
--+--Alpha-BHC
--Gamma-BHC (Lindane)
--+-Heptachlor Epoxide
--.---.,-7
• I
',..____ _____ -~------
N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ..0 '-C OJj u 0 ..0 '-0 a. ;:J ;:J u V a.
'-', < ~ <( 0 Q '-', <(
Sample Dates
--iiiiil liiiil iiiil iiiil iill -l!!l!!!l
VOC Trends in MW-5D
45
40 ,~-~"=--=_c~~~-~~=-~-~-~~--~~~:---~-~-e=--,=--~=ec-=''S'"~C=-~=-"'~~--~--~-=-="=· ·=•-=-~-~--=-~-~--~--=~-~-=-=--=•-=-=-·-"'---' ,-: -------,
~ :<· 1
35
30
15
10
5
0
, _ __:_. _' ·, ---_, _ _, .
0 0 ~ 0. <
0 0 ' OI)
::l <
----·-----
0 0 0 0 ' ' u u
0 V
Ci
---' -1 -----~------
---------------
• -1 --____ _____J
N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' .D ... ,::: Oil u u .D ...
<l) 0. ::l ::l u "' 0. c,.. < ~ < 0 Ci c,.. <
Sample Dates
e:51
---I, 1-Dichloroethane
---o---Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
-+-Trichloroethene
§
;;
h
" '1)
0 " 0 u
liiiii
VOC Trends in MW-6D
.-
14
·,"
12 ,--C----.~--~-~~~~-~.~~~---~.-·~,~~--~#-=-=~-~-~--=-~-='='==-~--aa===""'-<~~====~-~=-~--=--~-~-·~-,-i -' .,. '
8
6
'-, ~-_______ ....... ~----·---
-.
4
2 ______ -0--.,...--
~. -
0 ----------------___ ....:....:. ....... __
0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' "-h " O!) u 0 ..0 h " O!) u 0 ..0 Q. :, :, V V Q. :, :, 0) V Q.
<I'. ~ <I'. 0 0 u.. <I'. ~ <I'. 0 0 u.. <I'.
Sample Dates
liiil
-o-1, 1-Dichloroethene
---Chloroform
-o-Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
--t-Trichloroethene
iiiil -iiilil liil
YOC Trends in MW-9
I
250 ._, _,_, ____ ..u
... ,~7","---. -::-, .... ,!
. ,. ~ '.;I
I
'I , I
200 _j
--+---I, 1-Dichloroethane
--o--I, 1-Dichloroethene
-¼--Chloromethane
'\,. -O-Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
-+-Trichloroethene
0 '
0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,_ C 01) u u ,D ,_ C 01) u u ,D ,_
0. ::J ::J V V 0. ::J ::J u C) 0. < ~ < 0 0 "-< ~ < 0 0 "-<
Sample Dates
-llliE
50
40
20
10
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' '-" oJJ u u n 0. ;::, ;::, V V -< ~ -< 0 0 Cl.
iiiil iiiiii) liil I!!!!!]
VOC Trends in MW-I I
0 0 0 ' ' ' '-~ oJJ 0. ;::, ::, -< ~ -<
Sample Dates
0 ' u 0
. . -----------~ --
0 ' u
V 0
,.
--~---:---=-1
N 0 ' n a,
Cl.
' i
'
--........i
!!!!!!I
-+-I, 1-Dichloroethane
-O-Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
-+-Trichloroethene
VJ '" a 'O ii'" tJ '" ;; V, Apr-00 .lun-00 Aug-00 Oct-00 -0 V, 0 Concentration (ug/L) -v, tv 0 tv V, ' <.,; 0 w V, 1----, -·,:_-··-----:--;~-:,-;c--_ --··:;,--· ----1~-----.·:1 •. II > 11· . ·!I ' !i . Ii,:·· : )1·· -.. 1::.. . • I I •. I . • . 't ' L I I . . 1 . I _2_J_'il~-. ~-··t!i •~-j! ': 7[ · i,:' .: I .... I ' ' [!·: iii ,-i .·.(::~ii· ·I· ·_1:1, • 1 · · · I' · 1 · · · · I · I 1 • I I,,-·. . . , ;i I · · .'. I '.. . · I• .. · • ' · 11--..:.0-II , I • ' • , 1 . ·,. It ' ,I •, ' :j:' '.J ! . -4 0 !l 'I . ·1, ,11 ·· < .. ·11 . ' 11 I. . I, j ,t .'· o·!i ;'1· I . . Ii '-I • . - ' :· . -1 f : ' < ' -~"'. 1 ~ Dec-00 -11-' ·. . '1 . • ... II r :: ' i: ' . : • . ,· : : : . . ;II:,:: .•.. l I . I . . I •• I · 1 ·· . . ' '! ' I. i. I . Feb-01 f .... 11. :··: [ ·, ·.:Ji . ·. · , I . ·,il-· · . ~-· Apr-01 .lun-01 Aug-01 Oct-01 Dec-01 Feb-02 J\pr-02 . ·'· : ': ; .. . , . :,; • ; ' : . : ' ! •• . : . • . ~ I I . . . 1 I · ·, :· I· . . . I ' . . . ·1 ' . . . 1 · . . j ' . ' ' I , . _ . i_ .. . . If _;_ ~----· --., -1 ·_··· .. > . ,. 1· ·, ''i . _;:::: i ._ . : I . 1· · -· ii : .· · . . f . . . I ·. 111· ·,··. ·1': · ·; .. ·1 .-. ·. 11_· ·: ,-: .. ·• 1·1 · -, .. ·• ·. "· .· :•. . . . ~ ' I ;-I " ',; ·, ._· . . I • · 1 -. ;. i d' · 1 ·, -1 -Ii. ! ' . :I\ ·~ .~j . ! I, , 11 . i ·. ·: l ':· ·11 :f: , .. ii . :j1 . ill'' . ' I · .· 1 I:· · -1 · .· . · : ' _ : ; I_ ; · . :··i r . : . · . · , ,.· ·J,' w .· . ii .':: :I .·. ::i, ··\ 1i ·. ·.°Ji· . ,' II::.·. i· · . 11 , . i 1 : . . 1 · .. ··1 ~ . · ·. · -i , . , ·i I . , · 1 . . : : . , lL ·::1L· ,, ·, ,· ,:· ··::. ,i. ·1. '. L.~ ..... J -~-J ___ :_Jl ,c.cJ:_ · .. ,:1·, .• :. IL.· _:_, __ ,_j t ? ..., ..., ..., (I) n· :; ;:," '" -(') 0 ;:," ..., -0 0 (1) ..., ~ 0 ;:," (1) (1) ~ " ;:," (1) (I) " (1) ~ >-t) () c I I I I I I I I < ' I ~ I (I) I " ~ I ::;:: I ' ';: I I I i ~ ~ ~ a D
C 0
60
50
40
30 2
5 u g u 20
IO
0
91
. ---.. -·'
. ' . . -----~
i
!, ___ --------------.,. --,--:--.' T -----,-.--.;, • ,,
----.----
.. , ,,
VOC Trends in W-29
•,t,
·--------1.~ --~-·--------
: ... -·-----"--1 __ .,_
' ,,
----·;, I
--~-----·....: ·-----· . -.. ----. ---.. --· ____ _:_____ -. ---. -_.-----...:...... . .,_ -. -1
0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' Cl.. C oJJ u u .D ~ C oJJ u u .D ~ ;::J ;::J 0 0 V 0. ;::J ;::J V V 0. <!'. -. <!'. Cl u... <!'. -. <!'. 0 Cl u... <!'.
Sample Dates
el
---+--I, 1-Dichloroethane
-¾--Chloroform
--o---Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
-t-Trichloroethene
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIXG
DEPTH TOW ATER CHARTS
H
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
70.00
60.00
50.00
2 i 30.00
"' 0
20.00
10.00
0.00
11/01/2001
.
...
./ -~ / .
12/01/2001
Depth to Water
RW-10
November 200 l through April 2002
.. . A
--___/
' '
01/01/2002 02/01/2002 03/01/2002
Dates
• V -. A\
\
04/01/2002 05/01/2002
- - - - - -----&iii _, iiil illll --.. -liill·
~ a:: ~
~
(U
"' 3:
0
.c
0. a)
Cl
· 70.00
60.00 .
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
11/01/2001
. •
'
12/01/2001
Depth to Water
RW-9
November 2001 through April 2002
'
0 l /0 l /2002
'
02/01/2002
Dates
-,
03/01/2002
~ . ~\
\
04/01/2002 05/01/2002
~ a::
~
'-cu
cii
60.00
50.00
40.00
:3: 30.00
2
..c:
0. "' 0
20.00
10.00
0.00
11/01/2001
Depth to Water
RW-8
November 200 I through April 2002
/V. ~
~-
~
12/0 I /200 I 01/01/2002
• •
02/01/2002
Dates
♦
'
03/01/2002
♦ . ..... ,
\
'
04/01/2002 05/01/2002
~ ,;::
~
'-<l)
'"
Depth to Water
RW-7
November 200 l through April 2002
~ 30.00 -i-------------------------------------------j
..c 0. <l)
0
0.00 -t--------,-------,----------,-------,--------,---------,J
l 1/01/2001 12/0 l /200 I 01/01/2002 02/01/2002 03/01/2002 04/01/2002 05/01/2002
Dates
~ ,;::
~
i, ;;
Depth to Water
RW-6
November 2001 through April 2002
:$ 30.00 -j--------------------------------------_J
2
.<:: 0-" 0
0.00 -j--------~-----------~-----------------_J
11/01/2001 12/01/200 l 01/01/2002 02/01/2002 03/01/2002 04/01/2002 05/0 l /2002
Dates
~ a::
~
'-a) ;;;
Depth to Water
RW-5
November 201 through April 2002
;3: 30.00 -+--------------------------------------__j
3
0.00 -+-------------~------------------------__j
11/01/2001 12/01/2001 01/01/2002 02/01/2002 03/0 l /2002 04/01/2002 05/01/2002
Dates
-= --&ill! lliliil -._, .. --liiil liiil -----illil -
~ c;::
~
'-v "'
Depth to Water
RW-4
November 200 I through April 2002
40.00 -i-----------------------------------\-------c
:$ 30.00 -i-----------------------------------------j 0 -..c: 0. "' Cl
0.00 -t-------,---------,---------,-------,--------,--------,J
11/01/2001 12/01/200 I 01/01/2002 02/01/2002 03/01/2002 04/01/2002 05/01/2002
Dates
~ <;::
~ .... '-' cl ~
0
..c: 0.
<l.)
Cl
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
11/01/200 I
. . . . .
'
12/0 I /200 I
Depth to Water
RW-3
November 200 I through April 2002
. . .
'
01/01/2002
'
02/01/2002
Dates
I
I
1
'
03/01/2002
\
\ •
7 '
04/01/2002 05/01/2002
~ q::
~
~
'ci ~
0
..c
0. " Cl
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
Depth to Water
RW-2
November 200 l through April 2002
0.00 +-------------~------------------------~
l 1/0 l/200 l 12/01/200 I 0l/01/2002 02/01/2002 03/01/2002 04/01/2002 05/01/2002
Dates
----
70.00
60.00
50.00
;, 40.00
'" "' 0
li 30.00
<l)
0
20.00
10.00
0.00
l---/
I 1/01/2001
- -- - -
l!!!!!l!!!I 9:1
Depth to Water
RW-1
November 200 I through April 2002
\
~
~ . -
'
I 2/01/2001
. . --
'
01/01/2002
. -
02/01/2002
Dates
03/01/2002
liiiill l!iiiil iiiil iiliil .
I\ I
I V \
I ".
'
04/01/2002 05/01/2002