NCD000770487_20010807_Johnson Controls Battery Group_SERB C_Pre-NPL File 1990 - 2001-OCR

• TRIP NOTIFICATION AND AUVIORIZATION FORM
Program:
[ CERCLA Site Assessment
[S1atc
Brownfields
MGP
G::NPUDO!l
ite Name:
ID Number:
Street Address:
ity:
County:
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc,
NCD 000 770 487
Dry Cleaners
West Mountain St.reel (Old Greensboro Road) SR 2377
Winston-Salem
Forsyth County, NC 27102
Date(s) of Trip
6 & 7 August 200 I
Trip Canceled: Trip Rescheduled (Date):
Reason For Trip: Sa.-r17 Overview (R.Q.r.dJ-{ w/(( nof--fa e. ,;:~ ~s:)
(ifstimpling, check appropriate boxes below)
X Surface Soil Groundw:1ter (bailcrs)
Subsurface Soil Groundwater (pumps)
Using Augers/Shovels to collect soil
Using Lillie Beaver to collcc1 soil
Groundwa1er (from tap)
X Surface Water
X Sediment
Assistant Assistant Assistant
Authorized By:
Office Use Only
County Health Deparlmc~l Official Contact: VaA Su Iii, un ·
/ Title:
Phone Number: i ( 33?) 727 -..8e6tr 27(; o
Fred._ Ove,gf,-ee:f
Erw, f!edl..(-fl.-..15,,e,._'frr
Health Depat1ment OCficial €ontacted: Back Up Letter Required?: Yes . . l .
c,/\'/,2cfd. 1/\r. Ovu;,yeeh (Ji,;._pivNz, (?<2-o/ ({)el)
Scdimcnt/Surfac~ wdter Samplin'g event for ECO Toxicity Testing ofLead ! rr,~fr::: C V1£:..W . ·· · .... · Notes:
No
In Wetland Area, Haryna is·reviewing work plan & sediment sample results.for applicability
DU1·lb(TRI P _NOT_A UTH. FRM) R1•vised: 0/122/01
I
TRIP NOT/FICA TIQNAND AUTHORIZATION FORM
Program: D CERCLA Site Assessment □ Brown fields
~le
l::'.J NPL/DOD
□ MGP
□ Dry Cleaners
Site Name:
ID Number:
Street Address:
City:
County:
Da:2:) of Trip
::>. l<t -c~ /'Of
Trip Canceled: Trip Rescheduled (Date):
Reason For Trip:
D Surface Soil
D Subsurface Soil
D Using Augers/Shovels to collect soil
D Using Little Beaver to collect soil
D Groundwater (from tap)
Pro·ect Team Leader
Authorized By:
(if sampling, check appropriate'boxes below)
D Groundwater (hailers)
D Groundwater (pumps)
D Surface Water
D Sediment
Assistant Assistant
O[fice Use Only_
County Health Department Official Contact: Fred ove--~1,-d
Assistant
Title: b?v.
-:J.7Co
lk(d.fl:i. /Jrec.'_&r
Phone Number: (°5::SC) 727
Health Department Official Contacted: Back Up Letter Required?: Yes
h e-d.. Ovv>f.-e.a -
('O,t!?,L') Notes: j J 7, /',.'o ,/ ,1Jr ,-),,,, /4~-r ..J.,.. r-o r
' /
No
I
✓
Dll,lb(TRIP _NOT_ A UTH.FRM) Revised: 0112 2/0 I
I
Program: D Federal
D State
~L/D0D
Site Name:
ID Number:
Street Address:
City:
County:
TRIP I TI FICA TION AND A UTHORIZA T1', FORM
D Brownfields
□ MPG
D Dry Cleaners
;]"p hY\S o IC\ ~ vCit ):(9,,l S Bn ij:;J G;:rry, :r:
\~~:;;1~~:t:;01 :J:oh1\2en CQMtraA~ R~
W(},l b,_e.;.-:to~" ( \AJ\ 1d,:i--..,,., s.,,A-e,W\) N#:ith ~6
fo"<'Syfb
Trip Canceled: Trip Rescheduled (Date):
Reason For Trip:
~urfacc Soil
~ubsurface Soil
~ing Augers/Shovel.s lo collect soil
D Using Little Beaver to collect soil
D Groundwater ( from tap)
(if sampling, check appropriate boxes below)
~;oundwatcr (hailers)
~undwatcr (pumps)
~ace Water ~r~ ~'\,,,,r ~ e,y-
Assistant Assi tant Assistant
Authorized By:
Industrial Hygienist Signature
Office Use. 011/y
COooty BealthDepartrrient·Official Contact:
· _ . . , . • · .· .· ., . ·. ··••·, . Title:· ~vilir~I(·~ :•~. _fl'k~ ~:' <::;·!1,:• .,, ::'':
P~pne ~1:;Wser: ' ·' (~) 727 --8f)¾O ... ,,·· .. G'w He; IW<e IAre,,w ' ,, ,;, Ji
rJea_l:11 ~~pargnenr~f~cial Contact~d: :).71, 0 ' Ba~k~{.t,:~7Lr~9uired?: r,rrs' -;;,;~Q;)~
!': ::••:::, ·:" . -.. ,, _ ,, ., ... ·.-;·_,;, _·· , .. ··... . , . .., ··:·. ,•' · ,,-., .. · ,,"-, ,,-,, .. 'i' •·.. ·,'_l'.i(,' _,",,' .. I
Notes: .Af . . . · c:-' -· :J -'-CJo ., .Ii
DUs/h(TRl/'_NOT _A UTH.FRM) Revised: 8/3/00
,, . ,,
Lead pollution found at Walkertown
I of3
JournaINow HOME
+n1 mrrn:MAAYiGIUN~)
l~iiii:liiiiii''i1i·tfii[[;[\;ii\ii\ii:Mt1"~;
1tt1:fc:'J'IRQl.l~i'
Uf
i;i::·SPECIAl;'.RE~)
SEWI RGINIA'lOITERYµ
1Jicrmm1mmm_?:F111r~rH~jfJ
E-The People: Connect with
your government and your
fellow citizens.
Visit our message boards and
discuss Current Events.
PM • http://~umalnow.com/news/local/local/winston/battcry07.htm
M ·· tro'. lncludit\s;: Clemmons, Kernersville, e . ' t . 'Lewisville, Wi1l~rlown, \Vinslon-Salem
····· · · ······ · 7 · · ··' · -,md lot'S)1h C:Ounl)'
A&E I ASK SAM I BUSINESS I 0.ASSIFIEDS I CYBERGUIDE I HOME I LIVING I NEWS
OPINION I SEARCH I SPEAK OUT I SPORTS I THE WIRE I TV LISTINGS I WEATHER
Lead pollution found at
Walkertown
High levels found in soil at battery plant, in nearby
creek
By Carey Hamilton
JOURNAL REPORTER
WALKERTOWN
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is investigating lead
contamination of the soil at Johnson Controls Inc. and a nearby
creek.
EPA officials began contacting nearby residents in July about
spills at the battery-manufacturing plant and has added the site to
a federal Superfund list. To answer questions and explain
potential safety hazards, the EPA is sponsoring a meeting at 7
tonight at the Walkertown Public Library.
The N.C. Department ofEnvironment and Natural Resources first
learned about lead contamination at the site in 1990, said Randy
McElveen, a state environmental engineer in Raleigh.
Soil samples taken from the site had lead levels as high as 3,300
parts per million, more than eight times the federal standard of
400 ppm, said Luis Flores, the EPA project manager in charge of
North Carolina's Superfund sites.
Lead was also found in an unnamed tributary that flows into
Lowery Mill Creek and drains into Salem Lake, where about a
fourth of Winston-Salem residents get their drinking water, Flores
said. The tributary is about 800 feet offsite and about 2 miles
from Salem Lake.
The tributary had lead levels of320 ppm. Any level above 50 ppm
raises concerns about potential ecological damage, Flores said.
9/8/2000 10:43 AM
Lead pollution found at Walkertown
2 of3
• http://~umalnow.com/news/local/local/winston/battery07.htm
The state has taken samples from the lake and did not find lead
contamination, McElveen said.
Lead can be harmful to the environment, damaging plants and
aquatic wildlife.
High exposures also can lead to serious illnesses in humans,
including brain and kidney damage and reproductive problems,
according to the EPA. It is especially hazardous to children and
unborn babies, who can suffer from reduced aptitude, stunted
growth and hearing problems.
The lead may have come from the company's retention ponds,
which hold excess lead used to make the batteries, said Glen
Ponczak, the company's spokesman.
The ponds overflowed several times during rainstorms.
The Johnson Controls site is one of35 Superfund sites in North
Carolina. The Superfund program was created by Congress in
1980 to designate sites with toxic waste and to monitor the
cleanup of environmental hazards.
The plant was built in 1978 and employs more than 500 workers.
Dennis Knight said he was startled to learn that the EPA had
detected an excessive level oflead near his Walkertown-Guthrie
Road home.
EPA officials called the Knights earlier this summer to inform
them that the agency was investigating Johnson Controls, which
borders the four acres owned by Knight's family.
Two EPA officials visited the family to allay their fears about the
contamination.
Now, the Knights want more information.
"There is a concern that if they have another spill and it did run
off, what are we going to experience from it?" Knight said. "It
would be good to know what, if anything, Johnson Controls plans
to do to contain other spills."
Neighbors of Johnson Control's 75-acre site probably have
nothing to worry about, but there will be more sampling, said
Diane Barrett, an EPA spokeswoman in Atlanta.
"Johnson Controls has had some spills," she said. "But, to our
knowledge, it has not impacted the surrounding neighbors."
9/8/2000 l0:43 AM
Lead pollution found at Walkertown
3 of3
• http://~umalnow.com/news/local/local/winstrnvbattery07.htm
Based on samplings of three different residential wells in the area,
the state doesn't believe that the contamination has spread to
groundwater, McElveen said.
Town manager Stephen Hamilton said he is confident that the
EPA will handle the situation.
"We at this point, as far as their investigation, don't have any
concerns," Hamilton said.
"They're being thorough to see what problems exist and, if
contamination has taken place, that no further contamination
takes place," he said.
The site has a fairly lengthy history of contamination. Lead was
first detected in the soil at Johnson Controls in 1990, McElveen
said. Lead was also released into the air on several occasions, he
said.
Despite the findings, McElveen said that the spills at Johnson
Controls are relatively minor compared to others and the site is
not on the Superfund's national priority list, a list of the worst
hazardous-waste sites.
"Most facilities in the country have regular spills and releases to
the ground," McElveen said. "It's just a matter of determining
which ones could potentially impact the environment and
groundwater and especially the health of the people in the area."
After the meeting, the next step is to determine how extensive the
contamination is with more sampling, Flores said.
Johnson Controls has agreed to clean up the site and has hired a
contractor to begin the work in November, which the state and
EPA will oversee.
Published: September 7, 2000
JoumalNow Home Page
Arts & Entertainment I Ask SAM I Business I Classifieds I Cyberguide
E-mail Us I Living I News I Opinion I Site Map
Speak Out I Special Reports I Sports
The WIRE I TV Listings I Weather
© Piedmont Publishing Co.
Top of the page
9/8/2000 I0:43 AM
•
Memorandum
TO: FILE
From: Randy McElveen
Environmental Engineer
NC Superfund Section
•
July 12, 2000
RE: Community Interviews with Adjacent Properties
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. (JCBG) Site
NCO 000 770 487
Winston Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
On 10 and 11 July 2000, a representative of the NC Superfund Section
participated in door to door interviews oflocal officials, property residents, and businesses
located on property adjacent to the Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. (JCBG) Site
located off West Mountain Street, Kernersville, NC. The Itinerary for the Community
Interviews including the names and addresses of those contacted are included with a copy
of the informational folder that was handed out to all persons who were interviewed.
Some residents though not inteviewed personally were provided with the informational
packages at their doors.
cc: Grover Nicholson, NC Superfund Section
Dear Citizen:
• . &
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION'TGENCY
REGION 4
ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
61 FORSYTH STREET
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960
July 10, 2000
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has begun an investigation of the Johnson
Controls, Inc. Site located off West Mountain Street, Kernersville, NC. When EPA conducts a
Superfund investigation at any site we must ensure that the public has an opportunity to
participate in the process. To do this, the Agency conducts interviews with citizens as well as
mailing a questionnaire to citizens to determine if they have concerns about the Site and how
they want to be involved .
We are currently in the process of conducting interviews with citizens in the Kernersville area in
order to determine what concerns they have or if they have concerns regarding the Johnson
Controls, Inc. Site, and to gather historical information about the Site. This process includes
interviewing citizens currently living near the Site or those that have lived or worked there in the
past, city and county government officials, the media, business organizations, environmental
groups, and the general public. From the information gathered we develop the Community
Relations Plan (CRP) for the Site which outlines how the Agency will keep the public informed
and involved in the process. Since we will not be able to speak with everyone in the area
during our visit the week of July 10th, we have enclosed a "Community Interview
Questionnaire" for you to complete. Please return the completed questionnaire to EPA in the
enclosed postage paid envelope prior to July 28th so that your comments and/or concerns can
be anonymously included in the CRP, this way we can better determine how to conduct our
public outreach efforts to citizens in the area.
Literature is also enclosed to provide you with a better understanding of the Superfund program
and how it works. Should you want more information or have questions, please don't hesitate
to contact either Mr. Luis Flores, EPA Site Project Manager, or myself at the letterhead '
address or phone [phone]. We look forward to receiving your completed
questionnaire by July 28th. Thanks in advance for your cooperation in providing this
information, it is very much appreciated.
Sincerely,
Diane F. Barrett
NC Community Involvement Coordinator
Customer Service Branch ·
Waste Management Division
Internet Address (URL)• http://www.epa.gov
Recycled/Recyclable. Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postco~sumer)
Your Name
Address
Telephone Number
!A CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNITY 1IERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE
Date: ___________ _
Site Name: Johnson Controls, Inc. Site, Kernersville, NC
1. How long did you or have you lived near the Site (residents only)? _____________ _
2. When were you aware of the Site and what was the source of your information?
3. What is your understanding of the history of Site operations? ----------------
4. Have your been or are you personally effected by the Site? If so, in what way? _________ _
5. Have you or a family member been involved with any activities regarding the Site? If so, please explain.
6. Do you have any concerns about the Site? If so, what are they? ______________ _
7. ls/are there concerned citizen groups in the community that have been vocal in their concern over this Site?
If there are, can you provide us with a name(s) so that we can contact them?
8. Has there been much media coverage concerning the Site? _______________ _
9. Do you know of other people that w~ can contact for mor~ information? ____________ _
10. Are you on city water or well water?------------------------
11. Are you on city sewer or ac system? ----------..ll•-------------
12. What contact, if any, have you had with government officials concerning this Site?
13. How can EPA best provide you with information concerning activities at the Site? (i.e., newspaper, radio,
television, telephone, mail) Which newspaper to you subscribe to?
14. What are good days of the week for you to attend public meetings that will be held concerning this Site?
Also, what time of the evening could you attend? Where would you recommend we conduct public meetings?
15. Are you interested in attending these public meetings?
Yes No
16. How would you like to be or would you like to be involved in future activities? If so, in what way?
17. Are there additional comments or concerns that you want to share with us, or are there any questions that we
can answer for you concerning this Site?
18. We will be or have established an Information Repository which will contain copies of all of the documents
concerning this Site. Do you think you might read this information?
Yes No _____ _ Maybe ____ _
Date of completion:
[Please return this form In the attached self-addressed, stamped envelope. Thank you.]
Your cooperation in completing this questionnaire is very much appreciated. From the information we gather
through this process a Community Relations Plan will be prepared outlining the actions that the Agency will take in
order to keep you informed and involved. Thank you.
~~
Diane F. Barrett, Community Involvement Coordinator for this Site
Date: 7-/O -oz!
NORTH SUPERFUNO
,1.'-,,
JUL 07'00 10:05 No.001 P.02 •
ITINERARY FOR COMMUNITY INTERVIEWS
JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. SITE
Kernersville, North Carolina
Monday, July 10, 2000
Atlanta -Greensboro: AirTran #914 -LV@ 9:40AM AR @10.:45AM
Rental Car: Avis
Lodging: Quality Inn, 707 NC Highway 66 South, Kernersville
@ 336-996-3501
Appointments:
2:00 PM
4:00 PM
Tom Southern, Mayor Walkertown Phone: [phone]
Steve Hamilton, Town Manager
City Council Members: Dorothy Duggins, Wallace Larrimore, John
Tingen, & Horace Warner
Directions: From hotel travel west on W. Mountain St. to Hwy. 66, turn
right and travel approx. 3 ½ miles to Walkertown. Office on corner of
Morris Rd. & Old Hollow Road (office next to vets, across from hardware)
Bobby Kiger & Sue Whicker Kiger -meet at 332 Walkertown Guthrie
Road
Phone: [phone] & Cell Phone #[phone] -call cell# to
reco ofi rm appt.
Dinner
7:00 PM
Mr. Kiger is a mgmt. consultant, use to be in textile manufacturing. Said
white powder use to appear on his Mother's car, thinks It is lead oxide.
(Lots #008B, 1 0BE, 109A,011 A, 012)
Jack Stanley & Aprll Canter -meet at daughter's house 350 Walkertown
Guthrie Road
Phone: [phone] (Jack's#), 366-722-3463 (April's#)
(Lots #1 0BM, 1 0BL, 202)
i✓O RTH SU Pi: RF Ui✓ D ID: JUL 07'00 10:06 No .001 P.03 • Tuesday, April 11, 2000
9:00 AM Ron Graham, Deputy County Manager -Phone: [phone]
Forsyth County Commissioners: Dave Plyler and Richard Llnvllle
Rob Russ, Environmental Affairs Dept.
Directions: Bus. 40 to Winston-Salem Main St. exit, 2 blocks on left@
Room 700, Hall of Justice, Main Street, Winston-Salem
1 0 30 AM Robert Hllemn -Phone: [phone]
Sterling Sign (office), 3924 S. Holden Rd, Greensboro@ 336-292-7528
Directions: off 185 at S. Holden Road to office
1 :00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
4:30 PM
7:00 PM
(Lots# 008K, 009K@ 2721 W. Mountain St.)
Lunch
Otis & Marjorie Crews -Phone: [phone]
2771 W. Mountain Street (Lot 010)
Brother Allen Crews in nursing home, owns Lot 009C, daughter has power
of attorney for him.
Marvin & Margie Norris -Phone: [phone]
2661 W. Mountain Street ( Lot 017A)
John Wallace -Phone: [phone]
320 Walkertown Guthrie Road (Lot 0298)
Richard & Lisa James• Phone: [phone]
2667 W. Mountain Street (Lot 015, 016, 017)
Dinner
Dennis & Janine Knight • Phone: 336-724· 1176
304 Walkertown Guthrie Road (Lot 029A)
.. Stop by these houses and leave packet of literature & questionnaire:
Terry Alley, 340 Walkertown Guthrie Road
0.E. & Nellie Hauser, 2685 W. Mountain Street
Theophaleus & Alice Lashmit, 2691 W. Mountain Street
Gladys C. Whitley, 2655 W. Mountain Street
David Shaver, 2641 W, Mountain Street
Howard Moore, 2635 W. Mountain Street
Wednesday, July 12, 2000
Greensboro -Atlanta Air Tran #24 11 :20 AM -12:31 PM
NORTH SUPERFUND ID: JUL 07'00 10:05 No.DOI P.01 '
,..v;''•'~I) . . .· .......
-~, 1 ' '\: ,/ ., 1:,c,,1.\
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET
TO: i{t, .. ,I,, rr?cfl. ... ,, ,
(T /,JC7)£11JR., COMPANY/ORGANIZATION:
DATE· 1 L 1 (uiv ..
. I
PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: C//9-7J.J-f8//
NUMBER OF PAGES SENT (Including this cover sheet): 'I
Please contact the person sending this fax If It is received poorly or Incomplete •
..
FROM:
LUIS E. FLORES
NORTH SITE MANAGEMENT BRANCH
WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
Phone Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
COMMENTS: cttl~ /i. "'~ -" ... _/4 , . . . -1. . , . h. 0 I / •-' .J.,.,,.·
SCIVCRNDR
E:::...L HOLMl,N
W1:....LlAM L. MCYER
OJ RECTOR
•
TO: Randy McE!vcen
No. CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
July 7, 2000
FROM: David Lilley
RE: Comments prepared on the Draft Health and Safety Plan, Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.
June 2000
After reviewing the above mentioned document, I offer the following comments:
l. Page 1-8, Section 1.8.3, first paragraph: The route to the medical facility from the site is located in the "Drawings" section of this report, not Figure 1-1 as claimed. Please correct.
2. Page 1-9, first paragraph, last sentence: The address of the facility should be included in this sentence.
3. Page 2-8, Section 2.3.2: Modify the first sentence so that it makes sense.
4. Page 2-27, Section 2.7.4: Tables 2-2 through 2-5 mentioned in this section (and Table 2-1 not mentioned in this section) are not in the "Tables" portion of this document. Please correct.
Dl/dl/word/shsp.14
1646 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 2.7699•1 646 40 1 OBERLIN ROAD, SUITE l SO, RALEIGH, NC 27605
PHONE 919•733-4996 FAX 919·715-3605 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER• 50% RECYCLE0/10% P0ST•C0NSUMER PAPEa'.R
r •
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4
RECEIVED
'JUL 032000
SUPERFUND SECTION
IN THE MATTER OF:
Johnson Controls Battery
Group. Inc.
Winston-Salem. Forsyth County.
NC
Johnson Controls Battery
Group, Inc.
Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ON
CONSENT FOR CONDUCTING AN
ENGINEERING EVALUATION/COST
ANALYSIS
U.S. EPA Region
CERCLA
Docket No.00-21-C
Proceeding Under Sections 104,
106(a), 107 and 122 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act, as amended, 42
u.s.c. §§ 9604, 9606(a), 9607
and 9622
I. JURISDICTION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
This Administrative Order on Consent ("AOC" or "Order") is
entered into voluntarily by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency ("EPA") and Johnson Controls Battery Group,
Inc. ("Respondent"). This Order provides for the financing and
performance of the Engineering Evaluation Cost Analysis ("EE/CA")
by Respondent and the reimbursement of response costs incurred
by the United States in connection with the property located at
2701 Johnson Controls Road, Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North
Carolina. This Order requires Respondent to investigate the Site
and identify and evaluate potential response actions to abate any
imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health,
welfare or the environment that may be presented by the actual or
, •
2
threatened release of hazardous substances at or from the Site.
This Order is issued pursuant to the authority vested in.the
President of the United States by Sections 104, 106(a), 107, and
122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9604, 9606(a), 9607, and
9622, as amended ("CERCLA"), and delegated to the Administrator
of EPA by Executive Order No. 12580, January 23, 1987, 52 Federal
Register 2923, and further delegated to the EPA Regional
Administrators by EPA Delegation Nos. 14-14-A and 14-14-C (./!lliL
14-14-D: Cost Recovery) and to the Director, Waste Management
Division by EPA Region IV Delegation No. 8-14-13.
EPA has notified the State of North Carolina of this action
pursuant to Section 106(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9606(a).
Respondent's execution of or participation in this Order shall
not constitute or be construed as an admission of liability or of
EPA's findings or determinations contained in this Order except
in a proceeding to enforce the terms of this Order. Respondent
agrees to comply with and be bound by the terms of this Order.
Respondent further agrees that it will not contest the basis or
validity of this Order or its terms.
II.PAR.TIES BOUND
This Order applies to and is binding upon EPA, and upon
Respondent and Respondent's heirs, successors and assigns. Any
change in ownership or corporate status of Respondent including,
but not limited to, any transfer of assets or real or personal
property shall not alter Respondent's responsibilities under this
•
3
Order. Respondent shall ensure that their contractors,
subcontractors, and representatives receive a copy of this.Order
and comply with this Order. Respondent shall be responsible for
any noncompliance with this Order.
III. DEFINITIONS
"Administrative Order on Consent" shall mean this AOC or
Order and all attachments attached hereto. In the event of
conflict between this Order and any attachments, this Order shall
control.
"CERCLA" shall mean the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42
u.s.c. §§ 9601 sl1,. ~-
"Day" shall mean a calendar day. In computing any period of
time under this Order, where the last day would fall on Saturday,
Sunday, or Federal, State or City holiday, the period shall run
until the close of business of next working day.
"Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis" or "EE/CA" shall have
the meaning assigned the term in EPA's 1993 Guidance on
Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions Under CERCLA {August
1993 EPA 540-R-93-057). For the purpose of this Order, the scope
of this EE/CA shall support the selection of a final response
action for each media of concern.
"EE/CA Oversight Costs" shall mean all costs, including, but
not limited to, past and future direct and indirect costs, that
the United States incurs in overseeing Respondent's
implementation of the EE/CA, and negotiating or enforcing this
•
4
Order, plus interest on all such ·costs.
"EPA" shall mean the United States Environmental Protection
Agency and any successor departments or agencies of the United
States.
"NCDENR" shall mean the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and any predecessor or
successor departments or agencies of the State.
"Interest" shall mean interest at the rate specified for
interest on investments of the Hazardous Substance Superfund
established under Subchapter A of Chapter 98 of Title 26 of the
U.S. Code, compounded on October 1, of each year, in accordanc.e
with 42 U.S.C.§ 9605, codified at 40 C.F.R. Part 300, and any
amendments thereto.
"National Contingency Plan• or "NCP" shall mean the National
Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.§ 9605,
codified at 40 C.F.R. Part 300, and any amendments thereto.
"Paragraph" shall mean a portion of this Order identified by
an Arabic numeral or an upper case letter.
"Parties• shall mean the United States and the Respondent.
"RCRA" shall mean the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended.
"Removal" shall mean the activities described by Section
101(23) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(23).
"Response Action" shall mean activities described by Section
101(25) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(25).
"Respondent" shall mean Johnson Controls Battery Group,
•
5
Inc. and any successor corporation.
"Section" shall mean a portion of this Order identified by a
roman numeral.
"Site• shall mean the acreage owned by Johnson Controls
Battery Group, Inc. encompassing approximately 75 acres,
located at 2701 Johnson Controls Road, in a rural area east'of
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina (hereinafter
referred to as the "JCBGI Site•), as well as the areal extent of
contamination from the JCBGI Site and all suitable areas in
very close proximity to the contamination which necessitate the
implementation of a response action.
"State• shall mean the State of North Carolina.
"United States• shall mean the United States of America.
"Waste Material" shall mean (1) any "hazardous substance•
under Section 101(14) of CERCLA,42 U.S.C.§ 9601(14); (2) any
pollutant or contaminant under Section 101(33), 42 U.S.C.§
9601 (33); (3) any •solid waste• under Section 1004 (27) of RCRA,
42 U.S.C.§ 6903(27); and (4) any "hazardous waste• under
applicable state law.
IV. FINDINGS OP PACT
For the purposes of this Order, EPA finds that:
The JCBGI Site is located at 2701 Johnson Controls Road, in
a rural area east of Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North
Carolina.
In approximately 1978 and 1979, the JCBGI constructed
the facility to manufacture, assemble and charge automobile
. ·:""-'"":_::· .•, •).y·
•
6
batteries. By 1984, plant production ranged from 6,000-11,000
batteries per day. In 1992, the facility expanded operations and
production rose to an estimated 14,000-22,000 batteries per day.
Raw materials used in the production of batteries include pig
lead, lead oxide, barium sulphate, carbon black and sulfuric
acid.
Since 1980, the facility has reported at least thirteen
unpermitted releases of hazardous substances from the plant
pursuant to Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community
Right-to-Know Act ("EPCRA"), 42 U.S.C. § 11023. During 1979,
to the company reported a 3,000 gallon spill of sulfuric acid ..
The contaminated soil was neutralized and shipped to a municipal
landfill. Later, the facility, also reported a release of lead
oxide dust covering about one acre which occurred while changing
filter bags from air ventilation equipment at the plant. In
August 1981, approximately 1,000 gallons of lead oxide and lead
sulfate containing wastewaters spilled into a sedimentation basin
on the JCBGI Site. Subsequently, the facility removed 324 tons of
lead contaminated soil from the basin and shipped the soil to a
RCRA landfill. In 1996, an unknown quantity of sulfuric acid
was spilled as a result of a leaking valve in a transfer line.
In JCBGI's inventory of reported annual air emissions for
1996, the facility reported fugitive or stack emissions of
antimony, arsenic, barium, barium compounds, carbon
monoxide, hydrogen gas, lead, lead compounds, nitrogen oxides,
selenium, sulfuric acid and sulfur dioxide.
•
7
On September 12, 1990, NUS·Corporation, an EPA contractor
conducted a Phase I Site Screening Investigation (SSI) of the
facility. On May 9, 1991, the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, (NCDENR) Superfund Section
conducted a Phase II SSI which included collection and analyses
of nine (9) environmental samples. The Phase II SSI confirmed
the presence of arsenic and cadmium in the soil at the Site.
On August 11-13, 1997, NCDEHNR conducted an Expanded Site
Inspection (ESI) which included collection of on-site soil
samples, off-site soil samples, off-site surface water and
sediment samples and off-site drinking water well samples. The
soil samples revealed lead, calcium, manganese, molybdenum and
zinc. The groundwater analytical results of samples taken from
private drinking water wells revealed elevated levels of barium,
copper, lead and zinc. However, to date, the source of the
contamination is undetermined.
JCBGI Site is situated on a hill that slopes northwest
towards unnamed tributaries to Lowery Mill Creek. Surface water
runoff from the buildings and parking areas on-site is collected
in storrnwater basins and a portion of this water travels through
underground pipes into unnamed tributaries. The Salem Lake darn
is located approximately 2.1 miles downstream of the Site. This
lake is a source of water which after treatment becomes drinking
water for the residents in the city of Winston-Salem, the towns
of Clemmons, Kernersville and Rural Hall and for parts of rural
Forsyth County. Analytical results from various studies
•
8
conducted at the Site including the 1997 ESI, indicate that
surface water, sediments and groundwater may have been impacted
by lead, zinc, manganese and other contaminants.
In addition, lead has been transported into a nearby wetland
that ls located at the intersection of one of the unnamed
tributaries that empties into Lowery Mill Creek.
V. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DETERMINATIONS
Based on the Findings of Fact set forth above, and the
Administrative Record supporting this response action, EPA has
determined that:
1. The JCBGI Site is a "facility• as defined by Section 101(9)
of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(9).
2. The contaminants found at the JCBGI Site, as identified in
the Findings of Fact above, include "hazardous substances II as
defined by Section 101(14) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(14).
3. Each Respondent is a "person" as defined by Section 101(21)
of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(21).
4. The Respondent may·be liable under Section 107(a) of CERCLA,
42 U.S.C. § 9607(a).
5. Respondent is •owner• and/or "operator• of the JCBGI Site,
as defined by Section 101(20) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(20),
and within the meaning of Section 107(a) (1) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.
§ 9607 (a) (1).
6. The conditions described in the Findings of Fact above
constitute an actual or threatened •release• of a hazardous
substance from the JCBGI Site as defined by Sections 101(22) of
•
9
CERCLA, 4 2 U. S . C . § 9 6 0 1 ( 2 2 ) .
7. The conditions present at the Site may constitute an
imminent and substantial endangerment to public health, welfare,
or the environment. Factors that may be considered are set forth
in Section 300.415(b) (2) of the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan, as amended, 40 CFR Part
300 ("NCP").
These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. actual or potential contamination of drinking water
supplies or sensitive ecosystems.
b. high levels of hazardous substances or pollutants or
contaminants in soils largely at or near the surface, that
may migrate; and
c. weather conditions that may cause hazardous substances or
pollutants or contaminants to migrate or be released.
These factors are present due to existence of numerous
organics including lead, barium and zinc.
8. The actual or threatened release of hazardous substances at
or from the Site may present an imminent and substantial
endangerment to the public health, welfare, or the environment
within the meaning of Section 106(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §
9606 (al .
9. The response actions required by this Order are necessary to
protect the public health, welfare, or the environment, and are
not inconsistent with the NCP or CERCLA.
VI. ORDER
Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, Conclusions of
Law and Determinations, and the Administrative Record for this
Site, it is hereby ordered and agreed that Respondent shall
•
comply with the following provisions, including but not limited
to the Scope of Work attached to this Order, and all documents
incorporated by reference into this Order, and perform the
following actions:
1. Designation of Contractor. Project Coordinator. and On-Scene
Coordinator
Respondent shall retain a contractor to perform the
3E/CA. Respondent shall notify EPA of the name and
qualifications of the contractor within 45 days of the effective
date of this Order. EPA retains the right to disapprove of any,
or all, of the contractors retained by the Respondent to do the
EE/CA. If EPA disapproves of a selected contractor, Respondent
shall retain a different contractor within 45 days following
EPA's disapproval and shall notify EPA of that contractor's name
or Respondent and qualifications within forty five (45) days of
EPA's disapproval.
Within 14 days after the effective date of this
Order, Respondent shall designate a Project Coordinator
'
who shall be responsible for administration of all the
Respondent's actions required by the Order. Respondent shall
submit the designated coordinator's name, address, telephone
number, and qualifications to EPA. To the greatest extent
possible, the Project Coordinator shall be present on Site or
readily available during Site work. EPA retains the right to
disapprove of any Project Coordinator named by Respondent. If
EPA disapproves of a selected Project Coordinator, Respondent
shall retain a different Project Coordinator and shall notify EPA
•
11
of that person's name, address, telephone number, and
qualifications within 30 days following EPA's disapproval.
Receipt by Respondent's Project Coordinator of any
notice or communication from EPA relating to this Order shall
constitute receipt by Respondent.
EPA has designated Luis Flores of the EPA, Region 4, North
Site Management Branch as its Remedial Project Manager ("RPM").
Respondent shall direct all submissions required by this Order to
the RPM at 61 Forsyth Street, S.W.,'Atlanta, Georgia 30303. EPA
and Respondent shall have the right, subject to the immediately
proceeding paragraph, to change their designated RPM or Project
Coordinator. Respondent shall notify EPA, seven (7) days before
such a change is made. The initial notification may be orally
made but it shall be promptly followed by a written notice.
2.1 Work Plan and Implementation
An Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) shall
be prepared as required by the NCP at 40 C.F.R. Part
300.415(b) (4). Respondent shall perform the EE/CA, and which
shall include at a minimum, the following activities:
(al Within 45 days after the effective date of
this Order, Respondent shall submit to EPA for approval a draft
Plan to conduct the Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA
Work Plan). The purposes of the EE/CA are to investigate the
nature and extent of contamination at the Site, and to assess the
current and potential Response Action Alternatives that will
achieve the designated Response Action Objectives. The EE/CA
• •
12
Draft Work Plan shall be developed and submitted in conjunction
with a proposed schedule for implementing the EE/CA Work Plan, a
Sampling and Analysis program, and Health and Safety Plan. These
plans shall be developed in accordance with the National
Contingency Plan, the "Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical
Removal Actions under CERCLA" (EPA/540-R-93-057, August 1993),
and the attached Scope of Work (SOW) which is hereby incorporated
into this Order.
EPA may approve, disapprove, require revisions to, or modify
the draf.t EE/CA Work Plan. If EPA requires revisions, Respondent
shall submit a revised draft EE/CA Work Plan within thirty (30)
days of receipt of EPA's notification of the required revisions.
Respondent shall implement the EE/CA Work Plan as finally
approved in writing by EPA in accordance with the schedule
approved by EPA as part of the EE/CA. Once approved, or approved
with modifications, the Work Plan, the schedule, and any
subsequent modifications shall be fully enforceable under this
Order.
b. The Respondent shall conduct the EE/CA to evaluate the
Response Action Alternatives for the Site. Respondent shall
submit an EE/CA Report that is in accordance with the sow and
the Work Plan.
c. Subject to the approval of EPA Respondent or its
approved contractor shall prepare a Risk Evaluation Report based
on the data collected by Respondent during the Site
Characterization. EPA shall release this report to the public
•
13
no later than at the time it releases the final EE/CA Report.
This report will be put into the administrative record for the
Site.
d. EPA shall respond to all significant comments on the
EE/CA Report that are submitted during the formal comment period.
e. Once the implementation of the EE/CA is approved by
EPA, and EPA has issued its Action Memorandum selecting the
removal activities to be conducted at the Site, Respondent will
then advise EPA whether it will implement the selected removal
actions either through an amendment to this Order or a separate
Administrative Order on Consent, as provided in Section xx of
this Order.
f. Deliverables, including reports, plans or other
correspondence to be submitted pursuant to this Consent Order,
shall be sent by regular certified mail, express mail or
overnight delivery to the following address or such other
addresses as EPA may designate in writing.
Luis E. Flores,
Remedial Project Manager
US EPA-Region 4
North-Site Management Branch
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, GA 30303
g. EPA may approve, disapprove, require revisions to, or
modify and the deliverables to be submitted pursuant to this
Consent Order. If EPA requires such changes, Respondent shall
submit a revised deliverable within 30 days of receipt of EPA's
notification of the required changes or within a time frame
. , ...•. ·:·
• •
14
agreed to in writing by the RPM. Respondent shall implement
actions set forth in the deliverable as finally approved in
writing by EPA in accordance with .the schedule approved by EPA.
Once approved such deliverables shall be fully enforceable under
this Administrative Order on Consent.
2.2 Health and Safety Plan
Within 45 days after the effective date of this Order, the
Respondent shall submit for EPA review and comment a plan that
ensures the protection-of the public health and safety during
performance of on-Site work under this Order. This plan shall be
prepared in accordance with EPA's current Standard Operating
Safety Guide. In addition, the plan shall comply with all
current applicable Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) regulations found at 29 CFR Part 1910. Respondent shall
incorporate all changes to the plan recommended by EPA, and
implement the plan during the pendency of the EE/CA action.
2.3 Quality Assurance and Sampling
All sampling and a~alyses performed pursuant to this Order
shall conform to EPA direction, approval, and guidance regarding
sampling, quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC), data
validation, and chain of custody procedures. Respondent shall
ensure that the laboratory used to perform the analyses
participates in a QA/QC program that complies with the
appropriate EPA guidance. Respondent shall follow the following
documents, as appropriate, as guidance for QA/QC and sampling:
"Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance for Removal
•
l.S
Activities: Sampling QA/QC ·Plan and Data Validation Procedures,"
OSWER Directive Number 9360.4-0l.; dated January l.990; "Compendium
of ERT Procedures," OSWER Directives Numbered 9360.4-04 through
9360.4-08; and EPA representative sampling guidance for soil,
air, ecology, waste, and water as this information becomes
finalized and available.
Upon request by EPA, Respondent shall allow EPA or its
authorized representatives to take split and/or duplicate samples
of any samples collected by Respondent while performing work
under this Order. EPA shall have the right to take any
additional samples that it deems necessary.
2.4 Conveyance of Property
Respondent shall at least 30 days prior to the conveyance of
any interest in real property at the JCBGI Site, give written
notice to the transferee that the property is subject to this
Order and written notice to EPA of the proposed conveyance,
including the name and address of the proposed transferee.
Respondent agrees to require that its successor comply with the
immediately proceeding sentence and Section Three -Access to
Property a~d Information.
2.5 EE/CA Final Report
Pursuant to the schedule outlined in the EE/CA Work Plan,
Respondent shall submit for EPA review and approval, an EE/CA
report which complies with EPA's J.993 Guidance on Conducting Non-
Time Critical Removal Actions Under CERCLA (August l.993 EPA 540-
R-93-057) summarizing the actions taken under this Order.
• •
16
3. Access to Property and Information
Respondent shall provide, and/or obtain access to the Site
and off-Site areas to which access is necessary to implement this
Order, and provide access to all records and documentation
related to the conditions at the Site and the actions conducted
pursuant to this Order. Such access shall be provided to EPA
employees, contractors, agents, consultants, designees,
representatives, and State of North Carolina representatives who
shall endeavor to provide at least 5 days notice to Respondent.
Respondent shall be entitled to be present at all times when EPA
or the State of North Carolina employees, contractors, agents!
consultants, designees and representatives are present on the
JCBGI Site. While on the JCBGI Site or any property controlled
by the Respondent, all EPA and State of North Carolina employees,
contractors, agents, consultants, designees and representatives
shall observe and adhere to Respondent's security and safety
rules. Access provided and/or obtained by Respondent shall
permit these individuals to move freely on-Site and at
appropriate off-Site areas in order to conduct actions which EPA
determines-to be necessary.
Where action under this Order is to be performed in areas
owned by or in possession of someone other than Respondent,
Respondent shall use its best efforts to obtain all necessary
access agreements within 40 days after the receipt of the EPA's
comments on the Work Plan as set forth in 1 2-la. or as otherwise
specified by RPM in writing. Respondent shall immediately notify
•
17
EPA if after using best efforts it is unable to obtain such
agreements. In the event access is not obtained within the 40 day
period, the parties shall confer and determine if adjustments to
the schedule are appropriate. Respondent shall describe in
writing its effort(s) to obtain access. EPA may then assist
Respondent in gaining access, to the extent necessary to
effectuate the response actions described herein, using such means
as EPA deems appropriate. Respondent shall reimburse EPA for all
reasonable costs and attorneys' fees incurred by the United States
in obtaining such access.
4. Record Retention, Documentation, Availability of Information
Respondent shall preserve all documents and information
relating to work performed under this Order, or data collected
under this Order relating to the hazardous substances found on or
released from the Site, for six years following completion of the
EE/CA required by this Order. At the end of this six year-period
and 30 days before any document or information is destroyed,
Respondent shall notify,EPA that such documents and information
are available to EPA for inspection, and upon request, shall
provide the originals or copies of such documents and informat.ion
to EPA. In addition, Respondent shall provide documents and
information retained under this section at any time before
expiration of the six year-period at the written request of EPA.
Respondent may assert a business confidentiality claim
pursuant to 40 CFR § 2.203(b) with respect to part or all of any
information submitted to EPA pursuant to this Order, provided such
• •
18
claim is allowed by Section 104(e) (7) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §
9604(e) (7). Analytical and other data specified in Section
104(e) (7) (F) of CERCLA shall not be claimed as confidential by the
Respondent. EPA shall disclose information covered by a business
confidentiality claim only to the extent permitted by, and by
means of the procedures set forth at, 40 CFR Part 2, Subpart·B.
If no such claim accompanies the information when it is received
by EPA, EPA may make it available to the public without further
notice to Respondent.
5. Off-Site Shipments
All hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants removed
off-Site pursuant to this Order for treatment, storage, or
disposal shall be treated, stored, or disposed of at a facility in
compliance, as determined by EPA, pursuant to Section 12l(d) (3) of
CERCLA, 42 u.s.c. § 962l(d) (3), and the Revised Off-Site Policy,
(50 Fed. Reg. 49200 (September 22, 1993). EPA will provide
information on the acceptability of a facility under Section
121 (d) (3) of CERCLA and .. the above regulation. Prior notification
of out-of-state waste shipments should be given consistent with
OSWER Dire~tive 9330.2-07.
6. Compliance With Other Laws
Respondent shall perform all actions required pursuant to
this Order in accordance with all applicable local, state, and
federal laws and regulations except as provided in CERCLA Section
12l(e) and 40 CFR Section 300.415(i). In accordance with 40 CFR
Section 300.415(i), all on-Site actions required pursuant to this
• •
19
Order shall, as determined by EPA, attain applicable or relevant
and appropriate requirements ("ARARs•) under federal environmental
or state environmental or facility siting laws.
7. Emergency Response arid Notification of Releases
If any incident, or change in Site conditions, during the
actions conducted pursuant to this Order causes or threatens· to
cause an additional release of hazardous substances from the Site
or an endangerment to the public health, welfare, or the
environment, Respondent shall immediately take all appropriate
action. Respondent shall take these actions in accordance with
all applicable provisions of this Order, including, but not
limited to the Health and Safety Plan, in order to prevent, abate
or minimize such release or endangerment caused or threatened by
the release. Respondent shall also immediately notify the RPM at
404/562-8807 or, in the event of his/her unavailability, shall
notify the EPA Hotline at [phone] or [phone] of the
incident or Site conditions. If Respondent fails to respond, EPA
may respond to the release or endangerment and reserve the right
to pursue cost recovery.
Respondent shall submit a written report to EPA within 10
days after each release described in paragraph 6(a) setting forth
the events that occurred and the measures taken or to be taken to
mitigate any release or endangerment caused or threatened by the
release and to prevent the reoccurrence of such a release. This
reporting requirement is in addition to, not in lieu of, reporting
under CERCLA Section 103(c) and Section 304 of the Emergency
• •
20
Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§
11001 et fil'J;I.
VII. AUTHORITY OF THE EPA REMEDIAL PROJECT MANAGER (RPM)
The RPM shall be responsible for overseeing the Respondent's
implementation of this Order. The RPM shall have the authority
vested in a.n On-Scene Coordinator ("OSC"), 40 C.F.R § 300.120, by
the NCP, including the authority to halt, conduct, or direct any
work required by this Order, or to direct any other removal action
undertaken at the Site. Absence of the RPM from the Site shall
not be cause for stoppage of work unless specifically directed by
the RPM.
VIII. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
In accordance with Section 104(a) (1) of CERCLA, as amended,
42 U.S.C. § 9604(a) (1), Respondent agrees to reimburse the
Hazardous Substance Superfund for all response and oversight costs
incurred by EPA or its authorized representatives in oversight of
Respondent's performance of the EE/CA under the Consent Order.
At the end e>f each fiscal year, EPA will submit to Respondent an
accounting c,f all response and oversight costs incurred by the
U.S. Government with respect to this Consent Order. Oversight
costs shall include all direct and indirect costs of EPA's
oversight arrangement for the EE/CA, including, but not limited
to, time and travel costs of EPA personnel and associated indirect
costs, contractor costs, compliance monitoring, including the
collection and analysis of split samples, inspection of EE/CA
activities, site visits, interpretation of Consent Order
•
21
provisions, discussions regarding disputes that may arise as a
result of this Consent Order, review and approval or disapproval
of reports, the costs of redoing any of Respondent's tasks, and
any assessed interest.
EPA's Agency Financial Management System summary data (SCORES
Reports) and any other necessary documents, shall serve as the
basis for payment demands. Failure to submit an accounting in one
fiscal year does not prevent EPA from submitting an accounting for
that year in a subsequent fiscal year. Respondent shall, within
thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of each accounting, remit a
certified or cashiers check for the amount of those costs made
payable to the Hazardous Substance Superfund. · Interest shall
begin to accrue on the unpaid .balance from that date. Checks
should specifically reference the identity of the Site and should
be sent to:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 4
Superfund Accounting
P. 0. Box 100142
Atlanta, Georgia 30384
ATTENTION: Collection Officer for Superfund
A copy of the transmittal letter should be sent simultaneously to:
Paula Batchelor
Cost Recovery Section
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Respondent agrees to limit any disputes concerning costs to
accounting errors and the inclu~ion of costs outside the scope of
this Consent Order. Respondent shall identify any contested costs
and the basis of its objection. All undisputed costs shall be
•
22
remitted by Respondent in accordance with the schedule set out
above. Disputed costs shall be paid by Respondent into an escrow
account while the dispute is pending. Respondent bears the burden
of establishing an EPA accounting error and the inclusion of costs
outside the scope of this Consent Order. EPA reserves the right
to bring an action against the Respondent pursuant to Section 107
of CERCLA to enforce the response and oversight cost reimbursement
requirements of this Consent Order and to collect stipulated
penalties assessed pursuant to section XVI of this Consent Order.
IX. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
The parties to this Order shall attempt to resolve,
expeditiously and infonnally, any disagreements concerning this
Order.
If the Respondent objects to any EPA action taken pursuant to
this Order, including billings for future response costs, the
Respondent shall notify EPA in writing of its objections within 21
days of receipt of notice of such action, unless the objection has
been infonnally resolved.
EPA and Respondent shall within 14 days from EPA's receipt of
the Respondent's written objections attempt to resolve the dispute
through fonnal negotiations (Negotiation Period). The negotiation
period may be extended at the sole discretion of EPA. EPA's
I decision regarding an extension of the Negotiation Period shall
not constitute an EPA action subject to dispute resolution or a
final agency action giving rise to judicial review.
Any agreement reached by the parties pursuant to this section
• •
23
shall be in writing, signed by EPA and the affected parties. If an
agreement cannot be reached within the Negotiation Period, an EPA
management official at the Waste Management Division Director
level or higher will issue a written decision on the dispute to
the Respondent. The decision of EPA shall be incorporated into
and become an enforceable element of this Order upon Respondent's
receipt of the EPA decision regarding the dispute. Respondent's
obligations under this Order shall not be tolled by submission of
any objection for dispute resolution under this section unless EPA
agrees in writing to such tolling. If the parties are unable to
reach an agreement within the Negotiation Period, an EPA
management official at the Waste Division Director level or higher
will issue a written decision on the dispute to the Respondent.
Following the resolution of the dispute, as provided by this
section, Respondent shall fulfill the requirement that was the
subject of the dispute in accordance with the agreement reached or
with EPA's decision, whichever occurs.
X. FORCE MAJEURE
Respondent agrees to perfonn all requirements under this
Order within the time limits established under this Order, unless
the performance is delayed by a force majeure. For purposes of
this Order, a force majeure is defined as any event arising from
causes beyond the control of Respondent or of any entity
controlled by Respondent, including but not limited to its
contractors and subcontractors, that delays or prevents
performance of any obligation under this Order despite
• •
24
Respondent's best efforts to fulfill the obligation. Force·
majeure does not include financial inability to complete the work
or increased cost of performance.
Respondent shall notify EPA orally within 48 hours after the
event, and in writing within 7 days after Respondent-becomes or
should have become aware of events which constitute a force
majeure. Such notice shall: identify the event causing the delay
or anticipated delay; estimate the anticipated length of delay,
including necessary demobilization and re-mobilization; state the
measures taken or to be taken to minimize the delay; and estimate
the timetable for implementation of the measures. Respondent
shall take all reasonable measures to avoid and minimize the
delay. Failure to comply with the notice provision of this
section shall waive any claim of force majeure by the Respondent.
If EPA determines a delay in performance of a requirement under
this Order is or was attributable to a force majeure, the time
period for performance of that requirement shall be extended by
agreement of the parties for a period of time not less than the
actual duration of the delay caused by the force maieure event.
Neither the occurence of a force majeure nor such an extension
shall alter Respondent's obligation to perform or complete other
tasks required by the Order which are not directly affected by the
force majeure.
XI. STIPULATED AND STATUTORY PENALTIES
For each day, or portion thereof, that Respondent fails to
perform, fully, any requirement of this Order in accordance with
•
25
the schedule established pursuant to this Order, Respondent shall
be liable as follows:
Days of Non-Compliance
Day i-7
Day 8-14
Day 15-30
Beyond 30 days
Penalty($/day)
$150
$350
$750
$1,500
Upon receipt of written demand by EPA, Respondent shall make
payment to EPA within 21 days. Interest shall accrue on late
payments as of the date the 22nd day following the demand.
Even if violations are simultaneous, separate penalties shall
accrue for separate violations of this Order. Penalties accrue
and are assessed per violation per day. Penalties shall accrue
regardless of whether EPA has notified Respondent of a violation
or act of noncompliance; except that, in the event EPA concludes a
substantive violation of this agreement has occurred, other than a
violation of a schedule for deliverables set forth in the SOW or
a date for payment of stipulated penalties or oversight costs, EPA
agrees to verbally notify Respondent of EPA's position within 10
days of this detennination. · The intent of this provision is to
pennit Respondent the opportunity to respond to and correct the
violation before significant penalties accrue without Respondent's
knowledge.
The payment of penalties shall not alter in any way
Respondent's obligations to complete the performance of the work
required under this Order.
Should Respondent violate this Order or any portion hereof,
EPA may carry out the required actions unilaterally, pursuant to
• •
26
Section 104 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9604, and/or may seek judicial
enforcement of this Order pursuant to.Section 106 of CERCLA, 42
u.s.c. § 9606.
XII. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
Following satisfaction of the requirements of this Order,
Respondent shall have resolved its liability to EPA for
performance of the EE/CA that is subject of this Order.
Except as specifically provided in this Order, nothing herein
shall limit the power and authority of EPA or the United States to
take, direct, or order all actions necessary to protect public
health, welfare, or the environment or to prevent, abate, or
minimize an actual or threatened release of hazardous substances,
pollutants or contaminants, or hazardous or solid waste on, at, or
from the Site. Further, nothing herein shall prevent EPA from
seeking legal or equitable relief to enforce the terms of this
Order, from taking other legal or equitable action as it deems
appropriate and necessary, or from requiring the Respondent in the
future to perform additional activities pursuant to CERCLA or any
other applicable law. EPA reserves the right to bring an action
against Respondent under Section 107 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607,
for recovery of any response costs incurred by the United States
related to this Order or the Site and not reimbursed by
Respondent.
XIII. OTHER CLAIMS
By issuance of this Order, the United States and EPA assume
•
27
no liability for injuries or damages to persons or property
resulting from any acts or omissions of Respondent. Neither the
United States nor EPA shall be deemed a party to any contract
entered into by the Respondent or its directors, officers,
employees, agents, successors, representatives, assigns,
contractors, or consultants in carrying out actions pursuant·to
this Order.
Except as expressly provided in Section XIV -Covenant Not To
Sue, nothing in this Order constitutes a satisfaction of or
release from any claim or cause of action against the Respondent
or any person not a party to this Order, for any liability such
person may have under CERCLA, other statutes, or the common law,
including but not limited to any claims of the United States for
costs, damages and interest under Sections 106(a) and 107(a) of
CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9606(a) and 9607(a).
This Order does not constitute a preauthorization of funds
under Section lll(a) (2) of CERCLA, 42 u.s.c. § 96ll(a) (2). The
Respondent waives any claim to payment under Sections 106(b), 111,
and 112 of CERCLA, 42 u.s.c. §§ 9606(b), 9611, and 9612, against
the United-States or the Hazardous Substance Superfund arising out
of any action performed under this Order.
No action or decision by EPA pursuant to this Order shall .
give rise to any right to judicial review except as set forth in
Section 113(h) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(h).
XIV. COVENANT NOT TO SUE
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Order, upon
• •
28
issuance of the EPA notice referred to in Section XX" Notice of
Completion, EPA covenants not to sue Respondent for judicial
imposition of damages or civil penalties or to take administrative
action against Respondent for any failure to perform EE/CA actions
agreed to in this Order except as otherwise reserved herein.
Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Order·, in
consideration and upon performance of the EE/CA and Respondent's
-,
payment of the response costs specified in Section VIII of this
Order, EPA covenants not to sue or to take administrative action
against Respondent under Section 107(a) of CERCLA for recovery of
past and future response costs incurred by the United States in
connection with this EE/CA action or this Order. This covenant
not to sue shall take effect upon the receipt by EPA of the
payments required by Section VIII -Reimbursement of Costs.
These covenants not to sue are conditioned upon the complete
and satisfactory performance by Respondent of its obligations
under this Order. These covenants not to sue extend only to the
Respondent and do not extend to any other person.
XV. CONTRIBUTION PROTECTION
With regard to claims for contribution against Respondent for
matters addressed in this Order, the Parties hereto agree that the
Respondent is entitled to protection from contribution actions or
claims to the extent provided by Sections 113(f) (2) and 122(h) (4)
of CERCLA, 4 2 U . S . C . § § 9 613 ( f) ( 2 ) and 9 6 2 2 ( h) ( 4 ) .
Nothing in this Order precludes the United States or the
Respondent from asserting any claims, causes of action or demands
•
29
against any persons not parties to this Order for indemnification,
contribution, or cost recovery.
XVI . INDEMNIFICATION
Respondent agrees to indemnify, save and hold harmless the
United States, its officials, agents, contractors, subcontractors,
employees and representatives from any and all claims or cau·ses of
action: {A) arising from, or on account of, acts or omissions of
Respondent, Respondent's officers, heirs, directors, employees,
agents, contractors, subcontractors, receivers, trustees,
successors or assigns, in carrying out actions pursuant to this
Order; and {B) for damages or reimbursement arising from or on
account of any contract, agreement, or arrangement between (any
one or more of) Respondent, and any persons for performance of
work on or relating to the Site, including claims on account of
construction delays. In addition, Respondent agrees to pay the
United States all costs incurred by the United States, including
litigation costs arising from or on account of claims made against
the United States based.on any of the acts or omissions referred
to in the preceding paragraph.
XVII. INSURANCE
At least 7 days prior to commencing any on-Site work under
this Order, Respondent shall secure, and shall maintain for the
duration of this Order, comprehensive general liability insurance
and automobile insurance with limits of one million dollars,
combined single limit. Within the same time period, Respondent
shall provide EPA with certificates of such insurance. If
•
30
Respondent demonstrates by evidence satisfactory to EPA that any
contractor or subcontractor maintains insurance equivalent to that
described above, or insurance covering some or all of the same
risks but in an equal or lesser amount, then Respondent need
provide only that portion of the insurance described above which
is not maintained by such contractor or subcontractor.
XVIII. MODIFICATIONS
Modifications to any plan or schedule (or Scope of Work) may
be made in writing by the RPM or at the RPM's oral direction. If
the RPM makes an oral modification, it will be memorialized in
writing within 7 days; provided, however, that the effective date
of the modification shall be the date of the RPM's oral direction.
Any other requirements of the Order may be modified in writing by
mutual agreement of the parties.
If Respondent seeks permission to deviate from any approved
Work Plan or schedule {or Scope of Work), Respondent's Project
Coordinator shall submit a written request to EPA for approval
outlining the proposed Work Plan modification and its basis.
No informal advice, guidance, suggestion, or comment by EPA
regarding reports, plans, specifications, schedules, or any other
writing submitted by Respondent shall relieve Respondent of it
obligations to obtain such formal approval as may be required by
this Order, and to comply with all requirements of this Order
unless it is formally modified.
XX. SUBSEQUENT RESPONSE ACTION
Upon the completion of the EE/CA, its approval by EPA, and
• •
31
and issuance by EPA of its Action Memorandum selecting the removal
activities or alternative response activities to be conducted at
the Site by Respondent, the parties to this Order agree to use
their best efforts to reach agreement to either amend this Order
or execute another Order to articulate and document the
Respondent's implementation of the removal actions or other
response actions selected by EPA pursuant to the Agency's review
of the EE/CA. Respondent will then implement such selected removal
alternatives or response alternatives pursuant to the terms of an
amendment to this Order or through the execution of a separate
Administrative Order on Consent.
XXI. NOTICE OF COMPLETION
When EPA determines, after EPA's review of the Final Report,
that the EE/CA has been fully performed in accordance with this
Order, with the exception of any continuing obligations required
by this Order, EPA will provide notice to the Respondent. If EPA
determines that any response actions have not been completed in
accordance with this Order, EPA will notify Respondent, provide a
list of the deficiencies, and require that Respondent modify the
Work Plan if appropriate in order to correct such deficiencies.
Respondent shall implement the modified and approved Work Plan and
shall submit a modified Final Report in accordance with the EPA
notice. Failure by Respondent to implement the approved modified
Work Plan shall be a violation of this Order.
XXII. TERMINATION
This Order shall terminate when the Respondent demonstrates
• •
32
in writing and certifies to the satisfaction of EPA that all
activities required under this Order, including any additional
work., ·payment of any oversight costs and payment of any stipulated
penalties demanded by EPA, have been performed and EPA has
approved the certification.
The certification shall be signed by a responsible official
representing Respondent. The representative shall make the
following attestation: "To the best of my knowledge, I certify
that the information contained in or accompanying this
certification is true, accurate, and complete." For purposes of
this Order, a responsible official is a corporate official who is
in charge of a principal business function.
XXII. SEVERABILITY
If a court issues an order that invalidates any provision of
this Order or finds that Respondent has sufficient cause not to
comply with one or more provisions of this Order, Respondent shall
remain bound to comply with all provisions of this Order not
invalidated or determined to be subject to a sufficient cause
defense by the court's order.
XXIII. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Order shall be effective 5 days after the Order is
signed by the Director of the Waste Management Division of
EPA, Region 4. The undersigned representative of Respondent
certifies that he/she is fully authorized to enter into the terms
and conditions of this Order and to bind Respondent to carry out
the obligations set forth in this document.
• •
33
;-;i\...-1 I day of -~...: \ , 2000.
Title President
It is so ORDERED and Agreed this
2000.
day of
' DATE :_,_~-~-~_t__C'.)_t) __
Richard D. Green
Director, Waste Management Division
Region 4
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
I
EFFECTIVE DATE: l!> ~(\. (:) <)
INTRODUCTION
• •
SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE
ENGINEERING EVALUATION/COST ANALYSIS
JOHNSON CONTROLS SITE
WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
3/2/2000
The purpose of this Scope of Work is to outline the work to be performed by Respondent for the
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) at the Site. The scope of this EE/CA includes the
collection of the necessary data to determine the extent of contamination for all media, and to
support the selection of a final response-action for each media of concern.
TASK 1: EE/CA PLANNING ACTIVITIES
EE/CA Work Plan
Respondent shall submit to EPA a pl_an to conduct the components of an Engineering
Evaluation/Cost Analysis as outlined in tasks 2 through 8 in this SOW, and further detailed in the
EPA 1993 Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions Under CERCLA (Work
Plan). The Work Plan shall be developed in conjunction with a Sampling and Analysis Plan and
Health and Safety Plan, alt.hough each plan may be delivered under separate cover. Up to five
copies of the Work Plan and associated documents shall be delivered to EPA ( consult with EPA
Project Manager for the exact number).
The Work Plan shall include a comprehensive description of the work to be performed, the media
to be investigated (i.e., Air, ground water, surface water, surface and subsurface soils, and
sediments, etc.), the methodologies to be utilized, and the rationale for the selection of each
methodology. A schedule for completion of each major activity and submission of each
deliverable (reports, documents et,c.) shall also be included.
Sampling and Analysis Plan
Respondent shall prepare a Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) to ensure that" sample collection
and analytical activities are conducted in accordance with technically acceptable protocols and
that the data generated will meet the Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) established. The SAP
provides a mechanism for planning field activities and consists of a Field Sampling and Analysis
Plan (FSAP) and a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP).
The FSAP shall define in detail the sampling and data-gathering methods that shall be used on the
project. It shall include sampling objectives, sample location (horizontal and vertical) and
frequency, sampling equipment and procedures, and sample handling and analysis. The QAPP
shall describe the project objectives and organization, functional activities, and quality assurance
• •
and quality control (QNQC) protocols that shall be used to achieve the desired DQOs. In
addition, the QAPP shall address personnel qualifications, sampling procedures, sample custody,
analytical procedures, and data reduction, validation, and reporting. These procedures must be
consistent with the Region 4 Science and Ecosystems Support Division, Enforcement and
Investigations Branch, Environmental Investigations Standard Operating Procedures and Quality
Assurance Manual, May I 996 (EISOPQAM).
Health and Safety Plan
A Health and Safety Plan shall be prepared in conformance with Respondent's health and safety
program, and in compliance with OSHA regulations and protocols.
TASK 2: SITE CHARACTERIZATION
As part of the EE/CA, the Respondent shall perform the activities described in this task. The
overall objective of Site Characterization is to use existing data and collect additional data to
describe areas of the Site that may pose a threat to human health or the environment. This
objective is accomplished by first documenting Site location, meteorology, history, surrounding
land use and populations, sensitive ecosystems, and determining the physiography, geology, and
hydrology of the Site. Respondent shall then identify the sources of contamination and define the
nature, extent, and volume of the sources of contamination, including their physical and chemical
constituents and concentrations in the affected media. Surface and subsurface pathways of
migration shall also be defined. Respondent shall also investigate the extent of migration of this
contamination as well as its volume and any changes in its physical or chemical characteristics.
This investigation will provide for a comprehensive understanding of the nature and extent of
contamination at the Site. Using this information, contaminant fate and transport shall be
determined and projected.
During the Site characterization phase, the Work Plan, SAP, and Health and Safety Plan shall be
implemented. Field data shall be collected and analyzed to provide the information required to
accomplish the objectives of the study. Respondent shall notify EPA at least two weeks in
advance of any field data collection activities (i.e., sampling, drilling, etc) conducted as part of this
EE/CA. Respondent shall demonstrate that the laboratory and type oflaboratory analyses that
will be utilized during Site Characterization meets the specific QNQC requirements and the Data
Quality Objectives (DQOs) as specified in the SAP.
a. Field Investigation
The field investigation includes the gathering of data to define physical characteristics,
sources of contamination, and the nature and extent of contamination at the Site. These
activities shall be performed by the Respondent in accordance with the Work Plan and
SAP. At a minimum, this investigation shall include the following activities:
2
b.
• •
Investigating and Defining Site Physical Characteristics
The Respondent shall collect data on the physical characteristics of the Site and its
surrounding areas including, but not limited to, the physiography, geology, and hydrology,
and specific physical characteristics identified in the Work Plan. This information shall be
ascertained through a combination of physical measurements, observations, and sampling
efforts and shall be utilized to define potential transport pathways and receptor
populations. In defining the physical characteristics of the Site, Respondent shall also
obtain sufficient engineering data for the projection of contaminant fate and transport and
the development and evaluation of the response action alternatives for each media of
concern.
Defining Sources of Contamination
The Respondent shall locate each source of contamination. For each location, the lateral
and vertical extent of contamination shall be determined by sampling at incremental depths
on a sampling grid or in another organized fashion approved by EPA. The physical
characteristics and chemical constituents and their concentrations shall be determined for
all known and discovered sources of contamination. The Respondent shall conduct
sufficient sampling to define the boundaries of the contaminant sources to the level
established in the QNQC plan and DQOs. Sources of contamination shall be analyzed for
the potential of contaminant release ( e.g., long term leaching from soil), contaminant
mobility and persistence, and characteristics important for evaluating response actions,
including information necessary to evaluate treatment technologies.
Determining the Nature and Extent of Contamination
Respondent shall gather information to describe and determine the nature and extent of
contamination in each media of concern during the field investigation. Respondent shall
utilize existing information on Site physical characteristics and sources of contamination to
identify data gaps. To the extent that data gaps are identified, Respondent shall obtain
additional or confirmatory.data using analytical techniques sufficient to detect and quantify
the concentration of contaminants. Respondent shall determine and describe migration
pathways of contaminants through the various media at the Site. In addition, Respondent
shall gather data for calculations of contaminant fate and transport. The Respondent shall
determine the lateral and vertical extent of contamination to the contaminant
concentrations consistent with the established DQOs set forth in the QAPP. Respondent
shall use this information to develop the risk evaluation contemplated by Task 3 and to
determine aspects of the appropriate response action alternatives.
Data Analyses
Evaluate Site Characteristics
3
• •
Respondent shall analyze and evaluate the data to describe: (I) physical characteristics of
the Site; (2) contaminant source characteristics; (3) nature and extent of contamination;
and ( 4) contaminant fate and transport. The information on physical characteristics,
source characteristics, and nature and extent of contamination shall be used in the analysis
of contaminant fate and transport. The evaluation shall include the actual and potential
magnitude of releases from the sources and lateral and vertical spread of contamination as
well as mobility and persistence of contaminants. Where modeling is appropriate, such
models shall be identified to EPA in a technical memorandum prior to their use. All data
and programming, including any proprietary programs, shall be made available to EPA
together with a sensitivity analysis. All models shall be approved by EPA prior to their
use. The data shall be presented in a computer disk format utilizing Lotus 1-2-3 or·other ·
equivalent commonly used computer software. Analyses of data collected for Site
Characterization shall meet the DQOs developed in the QAPP.
c. Data Management Procedures
The Respondent shall consistently document the quality and validity of field and laboratory
data compiled during the EE/CA. At a minimum, this documentation shall include the
following activities:
Documenting Field Activities
Information gathered during characterization of the Site shall be consistently documented
and adequately recorded by Respondent in well-maintained field logs and laboratory
reports. The method(s) of documentation must be specified in the Work Plan and/or the
SAP. Field logs must be utilized to document observations, calibrations, measurements,
and significant events that have occurred during field activities. Laboratory reports must
document sample custody, analytical responsibility, analytical results, adherence to
prescribed protocols, nonconformity events, corrective measures, and/or data deficiencies.
Maintaining Sample Management and Tracking
Respondent shall maintai~ field reports, sample shipment records, analytical results, and
QNQC reports to ensure that only validated analytical data and/or data previously
accepted and utilized by EPA are reported and utilized in the development and evaluation
of the Risk Assessment and Response Action Alternatives. Respondent shall submit to
EPA results of all sampling or tests and all other data generated by Respondent or their
contractor(s). Analytical results developed under this Work Plan shall not be included in
any characterization reports for the Site unless accompanied by or cross-referenced to a
corresponding QNQC report. In addition, Respondent shall establish a data security
system to safeguard chain-of-custody forms and other project records to prevent loss,
damage, or alteration of project documentation.
4
• •
TASK 3: Baseline Risk Assessment
Respondent shall perform a risk evaluation to determine baseline risks to human health and the
environment caused by the site, and to establish cleanup level options. In general terms, the goal
of the risk evaluation is to (1) provide an analysis of the baseline risks and help determine the need
for a response action in each media of concern, (2) provide a basis for determining levels of
chemicals that can remain onsite and still be adequately protective of public health, (3) provide a
basis for comparing potential health impacts of various response action alternatives, and ( 4)
provide a consistent process for evaluating and documenting public health threats at the Site. A
scoping meeting between Respondent and EPA RPM and risk assessor shall be held to discuss
the format and scope of the risk evaluation. Reference 22 of this SOW is the BRA portion of a
standard RI/FS SOW. Reference 22 shall be used during the scoping meeting as _the starting point
of the discussions for the preparation of the site specific risk assessment report.
The human health risk assessment shall be conducted in accordance with EP A's Risk Assessment
Guidance for Superfund Volume 1-Human Health Evaluation Manual, and with Region 4 risk
assessment policy. The Ecological portion of the risk assessment shall be conducted in
accordance with the Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Process for Designing
and Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments (S.D. Luftig, 1997, June 2 Memorandum, OSWER,
EPA-540-R-97-006).
TASK 4: IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONSE ACTION OBJECTIVES
The EE/CA shall contain a statement indicating that the objectives of any future response action
at the Site are to address unacceptable risks posed by the Site. The objectives shall be further
detailed to take into consideration future land use at the Site and that the response action must
comply with the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP),
comply with Federal and State Applicable and Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs)
and/or achieve risk-based cleanup levels.
TASK 5: IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE ACTION
ALTERNATIVES
Based on the analysis of the nature and extent of contamination and on the Response Action
Objectives developed, Respondent shall identify and assess a limited number of alternatives
appropriate for addressing the Response Action Objectives. The alternatives shall consist of a
range of treatment and containment options or combinations, as appropriate, that address
contamination at the Site. Treatability Studies shall be performed by Respondent on an as-needed
basis to evaluate potential treatment technologies. If applicable, study results and operating
conditions will later be used in the detailed design of the selected response technology. If a
treatability study is needed, Respondent shall identify in a technical memorandum, subject to EPA
review and comment, candidate technologies to be evaluated. Implementation of a treatability
study shall be provided for in a Treatability Study Work Plan.
5
• •
Each alternative shall be evaluated against the following list of criteria:
-Overall Protection of Public Health and the Environment
-Compliance with ARARs and Other Criteria, Advisories, and Guidance
-Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence
-Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume Through Treatment
-Short-Term Effectiveness
-Implementability
-Cost
-State Acceptance
-Community Acceptance
These criteria are described in greater detail in section 2.6, pages 35-45 of the EPA Guidance on
Conducting Non-Time Critical Removal Actions Under CERCLA (August 1993).
TASK 6: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE ALTERNATIVES
A comparative analysis shall be conducted to evaluate the relative performance of each
alternative in relation to each criteria under task 5. The purpose of the comparative analysis is to
identify the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative relative to one another so that key
tradeoffs that would affect the remedy selection can be identified.
TASK 7: REPORTING
EE/CA Report
An EE/CA report shall be produced and submitted to EPA for approval. Up to five copies of the.
EE/CA report should be submitted ( confer with EPA Project Manager for the exact number of
copies). The report shall include in an organized fashion the information produced in accordance
with tasks 2 thru 6. In addition, the report shall contain an executive summary consisting of a
general overview of the contents of the EE/CA and a brief discussion of the Site and the current
or potential threat posed by the Si\e.
Monthly Progress Reports
A monthly progress report shall be sent to the Remedial Project Manager (RPM) by the 15th of
each month beginning the month after the initiation of field work and ending upon completion of
all field work and submittal of the EE/CA. The format of the monthly report shall include the
following:
-Major Activities for the previous month.
-Planned Activities for the present month.
6
•
-Problems Encountered.
-Data and Results obtained through field work.
TASK 8-EPA SUPPORT
There are several activities integral to the EE/CA process that will be conducted by EPA.
Respondent shall, on an as-needed basis, support the Agency with these activities.
Community Relations
The NCP and CERCLA direct EPA to implement the following activities to help discern the
needs of the community associated with the Site. It is anticipated that Respondent will perform a
significant number of these tasks.
-Designate a community relations spokesperson
-Perform community interviews
-Prepare a Community Relations Plan
-Establish an information repository
-Provide public notice of EE/CA availability
-Establish and make available an Administrative Record
-Hold a public comment period upon issuance of recommended response alternative (EPA may
hold a public meeting during this period to aid in soliciting community input)
-Develop written responses to comments on the recommended response alternative
Determination of Recommended Response Action Alternative and preparation of the Action
Memorandum
Upon submittal and approval of the EE/CA, EPA will generate a document outlining the
recommended Response Action Alternative, if any, hold a public comment period and produce a
final Action Memorandum, if necessary, that determines the Response Action to be implemented.
7
.. ,, . .:. .
•
ATTACHMENT A
REFERENCES
•
The following list, although not comprehensive, comprises many of the regulations and guidance
documents that apply to the EE/CA process:
I. The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan, March 8, 1990.
2. "Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies Under
CERCLA, Interim Final" U.S. EPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,·
October 1988, OSWER Directive No. 9355.3-01.
3. "A Compendium ofSuperfund Field Operations Methods," Two Volumes, U.S. EPA,
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPN540/P-87/00la, August 1987,
OSWER Directive No. 9355.0-14.
4. "EPA NEIC Policies and Procedures Manual," May 1978, revised November 1984,
EPA-330/9-78-001-R.
5. "Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Response Activities," U.S. EPA, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response and Office of Waste Programs Enforcement,
EPN540/G-87/003, March 1987, OSWER Directive No. 9335.0-7B.
6. "EPA Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans," U.S. EPA, Office of Research and
Development, Cincinnati, OH, EPA QNG-5, February, 1998.
7. "Users Guide to the EPA Contract Laboratory Program," U.S. EPA, Sample Management
Office, December 1986.
8. "Interim Guidance on Compliance with Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate
Requirements," U.S. EPA,. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, July 9, 1987,
OSWER Directive No. 9234.0-05.
9. "CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual," Two Volumes, U.S. EPA, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response, August 1988 (Draft), OSWER Directive No.
9234.1-01 and-02.
10. "Guidance on Remedial Actions for Contaminated Ground Water at Superfund Sites,"
U.S. EPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, (Draft), OSWER Directive No.
9283.1-2.
11. "Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) Volume I -Human Health Evaluation
Manual (RHEM) (Part A, Baseline Risk Assessment)." Interim Final. EPA, Office of
• •
Emergency and Remedial Response, EPN540/l-89/002, 1989.
12. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) Volume I -Human Health Evaluation
Manual (HHEM) (Part B,Development of risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals)"
U.S. EPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPN540/R-92/003, 1991,
OSWER Directive No. 9285.7-0lb.
13. "Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS)Volume I -Human Health Evaluation
Manual(HHEM)(Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives)." Interim. U.S. EPA,
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPN540/R-92/004,1991, OSWER
Directive No. 9285.7-0lC.
14. "Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS)Volume I -Human Health Evaluation
Manual(HHEM)(Part D, Standardized Planning, Reporting, and Review of supeifund Risk
Assessments)." Interim. U.S. EPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,
EPN540/R-92/004, January 1998, OSWER Directive No. 9285.7-0lD.
15. "Superfund Exposure Assessment Manual," U.S. EPA, Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response, EP N540/l-88/001, April 1988, OSWER Directive No. 9285.5-1.
16. "Guidance for Data Usability in Risk Assessment," U.S. EPA, Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response, EP N540/G-90/008, October 1990, OSWER Directive No.
9285. 7-05.
l 7. "Health and Safety Requirements of Employees Employed in Field Activities," U.S. EPA,
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, July 12, 1981, EPA Order No. 1440.2.
18. OSHA Regulations in 29 CFR 1910.120 Q:ederal Register 45654, December 19, 1986).
19. "Community Relations in Superfund: A Handbook," U.S. EPA, Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response, June 1988, OSWER Directive No. 9230.0-3B.
20. "Community Relations During Enforcement Activities And Development of the
Administrative Record," U.S. EPA, Office of Waste Programs Enforcement, November
1988, OSWER Directive No. 9836.0-lA.
21. Region 4 Science and Ecosystems Support Division, Enforcement and Investigations
Branch, "Environmental Investigations Standard Operating Procedures and Quality
Assurance Manual, May 1996 (EISOPQAM)".
22. Baseline Risk Assessment portion ofa RI\FS Statement of Work.
23. EPA guidance on Conducting Non-Time Critical Removal Actions Under CERCLA
( August 1993)
J~HNSON
CONTR~LS
Mr. Phil Vorsatz, Chief
NC Site Management Section
US EPA Region IV -Waste Division
Atlanta Federal Building
61 Forsyth Street, 11th Floor
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104
Johnson Ca\{ols, Inc.
Battery G,W
5757 N. Green Bay Avenue
Post Office Box 591
Milwaukee, WI 53201-0591
Tel. [phone]
June 11, 1999
RECEIVED
JUN 14 1999
SUPERFUND SECTION
Re: Johnson Controls Site, Winston-Salem, NC
USEPA ID: NCO 000 770 487
Dear Mr. Vorsatz:
This letter is intended to reiterate Johnson Controls' commitment to undertake necessary
action to address contamination at, and in the vicinity of, its Winston-Salem, North
Carolina battery manufacturing facility. As we stated during last week's meeting,
Johnson Controls is prepared to enter into an administrative consent order which would
encompass any required investigative and remedial work at the site, as well as long
term, if necessary.
This site easily satisfies the regulatory prerequisites for a non-time critical removal
action. We are confident that once your staff has had the opportunity to review the
record in more detail, they will reach the same conclusion. We are eager to begin
negotiations on a comprehensive AOC.
Following our meeting, Johnson Controls has elected to retain the services of
Montgomery Watson's Atlanta office to assist us on this project. I have enclosed a
statement of their qualifications for your review. The experience that Montgomery
Watson brings to this project should substantially assist all of us in addressing this site in
an effective, expeditious manner, to the benefit of all concerned.
Sincerely yours,
JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY GROUP, INC.
-~~~
Debbie Hastings, CHMM
Senior Env. Engineer
Enclosure
cc: Pat DeRosa, NCDENR (w/ enc.)
~~ .~;;;;;.. <'.?
_: ,./i" .. ' '
_ _...:···?r·:t
';',;
: .. '!:~~---Mlt~ e:•Hu~T'j
.t?A
~: ,.· ..
December 2, 1998
Mr. Otis Crews
2771 West Mountain Road
Kernersville, N.C. 27284
Subj.: Soil Analytical Results
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, NC
US EPA ID # NCD 000 770 487
Dear Mr. Crews:
•
As you are aware, the NC Superfund Section tasked Mr. John Thomas of the
US Army Corps of Engineers to identify and determine the presence of a wetland on
your property on June 3, 1997, as part ofan environmental assessment of the Johnson
Controls facility. Mr. Thomas determined that a wetland exists in a smail drainage
feature on your property as shown on the attachment (Attachment 1). A follow-up
sampling trip was arranged and conducted on August 11-13, 1997. During this time,
the NC Superfund Section collected surface water and sediment samples from the
wetland on your property as part of the assessment.
The results are summarized below in Table 1. The concentrations are listed in
parts per billion (ug/L) for surface water, and parts per million (mg/kg) for sediment.
Surface Water Samples
Background UT Basin 1 B1 Wetland B1 Wet Cnf. EPA·Aquatic
Analytes Units JC-001-SW JC-004-SW JC-006-SW JC-106-SW Benchmarks
Nickel ug/L
Lead ug/L
Manganese ug/L
Iron ug/L
401 OBERLIN ROAD, SUITE 150, RALEIGH, NC 27605
PHONE 919•733•4996 FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUN ITV / AJ'FI RMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER • 50% RECYCLED/1 0% POST•CONSU MER PAPER
Letter to Mr. Crews
Analytical Results
December I, 1998
Page 2
Analytes Units
Lead mg/kg
•
Background
JC-001-SD
Sediment Samples
UT Basin 1 B1 Wetland EPA Soil
JC-004-SD JC-006-SD Benchmarks
Antimony mg/kg 1.8 U 1 . 5 U ~illHlfoliiHb4h 31 mg/kg
Thallium mg/kg 2.1 U 1.8 U ~titL?'.?S'.;;i none issued
Iron mg/kg 22,000
Shading indicates a result significantly above the associated background
levels using EPA guidance.
U = Not Detected
J = Estimated Value
JN = Analyte presence tentatively identified.
Most surface water and sediments in your area contain trace quantities of inorganic analytes. An
analyte was not considered significant unless it exceeded background concentrations by a factor of
three (JC-001-SW and JC-001-SD). The compounds considered elevatei above background are
shaded in the above tables.
Surface Water Pathway Conclusions
The results indicate that iron, lead, manganese and nickel were detected in surface water
samples from the wetland on your property. According to EPA, lead can accumulate in tissue and
is toxic to aquatic organisms, and an observed release of lead has been demonstrated at levels that
may pose a significant threat to the nearest wetland on your property. The segment affected by this
observed release extends 332 linear feet downstream from the head of the wetland. Split samples
collected by consultants for Johnson Controls confirmed a release of lead to surface water at the
wetland.
Antimony, iron, thallium and lead were found in sediment samples from the same location
on your property. Since EPA has not established benchmarks to use in judging the risk posed by
contaminated sediments to aquatic organisms, no statement can be made at this time regarding the
risk to wetland plants and animals. However, EPA has established benchmarks for comparison of
risk to humans by contact with contaminated soils. The levels of contamination found in the wetland
sediments do not exceed any of the established benchmarks, and are not considered a threat to
humans.
.; ;..: . . /..,
, ..
Letter to Mr. Crews
Analytical Results
December 1, 1998
Page 3
•
',":"
. ' 1· ' :"!::: The results have been submitted to EPA for review and comment. The report finds that the 0 •
site has released contaminants to the wetland that would warrant future action by EPA. EPA has
indicated that they concur with the conclusions of the report. This report is available for review al
the Superfund Section in Raleigh. You can set up an appointment to review the document by
contacting Mr. Scott Ross at [phone], ext. 328. If you have further questions, please contact
Ms. Pat DeRosa at [phone], ext. 290.
cc: Pat DeRosa
Sincerely,
Douglas Moore
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
,· State of North Carl'I
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Monagement
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
;,1r. John Thomas
United States Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Subj.: Wetland Identification
June 4, 1997
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
US EPA ID: NCD 000 770 487
Dear Mr. Thomas:
DEHNR.
Attached are copies of a National Wetland Inventory Map for the Winston-Salem East
Quadrangle and an aerial photograph showing the approximate location of the two wetland areas you
. identified on June 3, 1997 along two wmamed tributaries connecting the subject site to Lowery Mill
Creek.
The first wetland is located on an unnamed tributary that connects pond #1 of the Johnson
Controls site to Lowery Creek. The wetland begins approximately l 00 feet upstream of a power line
crossing, and roughly 1500 feet downstream of pond# 1. The wetland appears to be continuous and
contiguous downstream from this point to the confluence with Lowery Creek. This wetland contains
the dominant plant species of alder, river birch and sweet gum. The wetland hydrology was a small
meandering slightly channelized stream that slows down causing the charmel to spread due to
laminar flow, with primary wetland indicators of saturated soils within the upper 12 inches, sediment
deposits and drainage patterns within the wetlands. The soil exhibited a low chroma I 0YR 4/1
hydric soil color. You indicated that this wetland would be classified as a palustrine scrub-shrub
type.
The second wetland is located on an second unnamed tributary that connects ponds 112 and
#3 of the Johnson Controls site to Lowery Creek. The wetland begins approximately 200 feet
upstream of a power line crossing, roughly 900 feet downstream of pond #3. The wetland appears
to be continuous and contiguous.downstream from this point to the confluence with Lowery Creek.
This wetland contains the dominant plant species of red maple, green ash, sweet gum and downy
dogwood, with poison ivy and sensitive fern. The wetland hydrology was a small meandering
slightly channelized strean1 that slows down causing the channel to spread due to laminar flow, with
primary wetland indicators of saturated soils within 12 inches, sediment deposits, drainage patterns
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, Norih Carolina 276 i 1-7687 Te:,.,phone 9 l\'-73:J-49Y6 FAX 919-715-'.k05
An Equal Opportur1ily Affim1otive Action [m;-.JIOi-'E:< ~iU'~ :u·...:yc!·:;ci/ ;Q% post-cvr1s1~mer popHr
Letter to Mr. Thomas
June 4, 1997
Page 2.
within the wetlands and secondary indicators of oxidized rhizospheres in the upper 12 inches. The
soil exhibited a low chroma IOYR 4/1 hydric soil color. You indicated this would also be classified
as a palustrine scrub-shrub type.
When you have completed your wetland determination form, please send it to:
Douglas Moore
NC Superfund Section
401 Oberlin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
I enjoyed meeting with you and sincerely appreciate your time and cooperation in this project.
If you have any further questions, please contact me at [phone], ext. 315.
attachments
cc: File
2
Sincerely,
Douglas Moore ·
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
. .
~AI\IDS .. INVE. .. N.TORY.
ARTMENT OF THE INT!:RIPR.
·, ''.
\ '-c;iO ... ,_
\1 ,, ,
! '
' .
,
'· ..... \ ' . ~ . ·':'W.=\.:.'.~ ~(
1 ··1 ('::_g:}\\,•\> . '·. 0 ,,
l " : I,'\-, 1.t'c.' . :l' ·, , -~~ ·,' ;:/ ;~:-~~--' :~
.' ,.:1l--.:.·1t--.L·· ,\ . .
(~
•-.. r;, :,\ ,.: ,._.-,.,, ,,< I • ",:-
, : • : • :
_,. ,. '/ • •'. ,, I ' ' , • ,, ••• • • • ;, • •
._ --~. '.,~ ·1 · ,, _·".: n k ,1 -, :: _:·.·.:{:_ -; · _·_:,:_.r_··.'._·
··. i,, •. ·11 ' j\ ' _'·., \\:__ .· . ' ' '-
• Yi_;' '>·',,'."\. ' '·i h C ,: •• , ?\'· . ' . • • .. : ;,,
· ._ · , · 9·"\". ,\ I Pu \v-,o . • . :, :;.-••liJI__,,~ ,· _. 'ly,;-:.
,, _ . , .·. ~;~~ ,~l'::.: -·0~;r: .. ··
1
_r:;~_?\\.·.·.·;,,.·. · -r,, ,, "'::, 'if/
'{<--11:\ ... ,.,<~-···,",._ • ... , '\\-s ,l,1; r
')'~• '•''!
1,-.i, . , . !,,;-•,) \._:.c I'•\ ,,\·•..... \• •
~~ '\I
~.-..... '. ,',,,/, •. _I ~I>' I 'n ~ I 11 ::,-::\1 -"<,',. ir·· \: :ll -:LltJ\\ :; ·: ;r\···t
.-~.:-:,:;{;,t.' -I.._'\ . ' /;I;;·· · .. ·, ~:(·\ . . I ' l~:1 ._ ·. •!...--' . ~--·' \·--. /[ .:• ' ·. . , ·cl_
. ·· .. \· \'t""~-, --\\-· . ~ '::.-"/-' \\, -~-' . ·. _,:. • .. {1• IF ·:1 • '.. \ .• f '\'. \\\ ·•• 1'·' 'j, .... ·, ,: .. _PlJ\'\J.··
< )!)'.:,• ~~~-~,;Ji{",·,: ~,,:~:,,, ', ·'o\_' ~\ . ,. ~ " : •" ;•),/:/oo, /: -,~,,J/'\;'~, ~~(~ .:
·•.iji;_·,.\ :::~, i J:ZP~-l ,':~~~· < '? . );, ::_'.·'-~j'/}:~t\·-,_·.w"'r,J~--~ :;::.:/4.t·~~ :~;·.·:··./11
·•:,J ((_,i.\>·;)/
. : . .: --.;.;;;<:t:?··-QJ••.=~~l\:r· · -··-:,_/·' .f,• ·.1.0· I ( •Ji ,,•//_'-... \\ 11 l -----; /-'-·.
--~ .• ... : ,' , __ ;..__,.'._). ··,1 • l ',q .. ;,
_i,.,:· ,;1·\., ... 9J~ ::gi\:~,. ,\. ;"f0,bKh_/ \•i•:.
~,' .. -o . ' . iw·• ·,., .., ' . ,.. ,,. i·\ ,, ··'J""' i,,. 111' .·, ''1'' .,.
c. --''V. ' , '-'0 • , • ~~•"•',._'<J ,·-,·, 1 < 1f,
1
1,_. ,·'_j . ;. JI ' ' 'V ~ ', I ,_ (\', ,/ ' '" )'"°'
, r.01;,"-n-,, , '\'~-· · · ·,,J-·---· , · · r.' ·\, \ · ·: :11: , i: :, ... ,,. ·,1 /, -.. ?~i: :'.,o. :'l/.
JA_ ·.",,,,--::ill: ... :::::,~~-. 1[ · .. • ·,·f"t ,/:· /\,.,r:::--j::.,,~._-;,_'.:: / _1 \· .1 ·.·.·••~--.,1\ ... ,;•. •1,~_e.-... ~
"· 7 .·-· .. ,, :: "·-; .. :; . r\ i:;7;__:,
·1 .~·.
I /'l-< t,~
.'. \(, , .-
;{I,
,'(
'-'·~•_/:(:_,/-.. }}·'
. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington_District
l 'J ,
RECEIVED.·
•' .:,,. :~~-~ification of Juris~ictiona,I De~ei~i~3.tl~:t' ,' / ;'\\;.''. 0µ~ 1 0 1997
. . ' . . , . ·:..: , ... ~-. -. . . . ,
Property owner/Authorized Agent: North Carolina Superfund S~ction c/o Dou0Jf~thlk1D SECTION
Address: 401 Oberlin Road, Suite 150, Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 ·
Telephone Number: [phone] ext. 315
Size and Location.of Property (waterbody, Highway name/num_ber, town, etc.): Superfund site
near the Joh11son Controls facility located off of. ,West Mou_niain St~~At,adjac~pt t_Cl Lowery Mill
Creek, near Winstpn:S~].ep:i,i11 Forsyth County,_Nort.h parCllina-c, _,._,: ,,;.,,,· .. y . , ..
lndicate·W,hich,ofthe follo.wing apply: · • •:,,.:,,, .· 1-,.·,.
X * There,are wetland_s _on the above described property whic~.we ~trnngly._suggest,_should be
delineated and surveyed. The surveyed wetland lines must be verified by our staff before
the Corps will make a final jurisdictional determination on your property. Concur with
the identification ofiurisdictional sites as outlined by your orovided mao dated June 4. 1997.
* Because of the size of your property and our present workload, our identification and
delineation of your wetlands canr.ot be accomplished in a timely manner. You may wish
to employ a consultant to obtain a more timely delineation of the wetlands. Once your
consultant has flagged a wetland line on the property, Corps staff will review it, and, ifit
is accurate, we strongly recomm~nd that you-have the line.surveyed for final approval by
the Corps. The Corps will not make a final jurisdictional determination on your property
without an approved survey.
* The wetlands on your lot have been delineated, and the limits of Corps jurisdiction have
been explained to you. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed three years from the date
of this notification.
* There _are no. wetlands present _on the above described prope_rty_.which are subject to the
permit requirements of-Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there
is a change in the law or ou~ published regulations, this determination may be.relied upon
for a period-not to exceed three years from the date of this notification.
* .The-project is iocated in one of the 20 Coastal Counties .. You should contact the nearest
State Office of Coastal Management to detem1ine their.requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material in wetlands on this property without a Department of the
Army permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311).
A permit is not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high ground. If
you have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact
John T. Thomas; Jr. • / . /at) [phone], Extension 25
Project Manager Signature: /J, >. )_j:;_ / .
Date: 7 July 1997 · (' ' Expiration Date: 7 July 2002
SURVEY PLAT OR FIELD SKETCH OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE
WETLAND DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE YELLOW (FILE)
COPY OF THIS FORM.
REMEDIA(JITE ASSESSMENT DECISION • • REGION IV p~ge 1 of 1
EPA ID: NCD000TT0487 Site Name: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE BATTERY DIV State ID:
Alias Site Names: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE BATTERY DIV
City: WINSTON-SALEM
Refer to Report Dated:
Report Developed by: Other
DECISION:
County or Parish: FORSYTH
Report Type: EXPANDED SITE INSPECTION 001
D 1. Further Remedial Site Assessment under CERCLA (Superfund) is not required
because:
D 1 a. Site does not qualify for further remedial site assessment under CERCLA
(No Further Remedial Action Planned • NFRAP)
D 1 b. Site may qualify for action, but is deferred to:
~ 2. Further Assessment Needed Under CERCLA:
2a. Priority: D Higher D Lower
2b. Other: (recommended action) Recommended for HRS Scoring
DISCUSSION/RATIONALE:
Site PRESCORE is above 28.5
State: NC
RECEIVED
NOV 10 1998
SUPERFUND SECTION
S'.te Decis:a~Bep&A
S1gnature~.,.:...___________~,..._.,,,.,_+--ff.~~.,_ _ _._ ______________ _ Date: 11 /06/98
EPA Form # 9100-3
I
October 23, 1998
Mr. John W. Walch
Environmental Engineer
•
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Superfund Section f:iE:Cf:f\/£:o
ocr26 7998
SUPER~•
401 Oberlin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27605
Subject: Johnson Controls / Globe Battery Site
Winston-Salem, Forsyth Co. North Carolina
NCO 000 770 487
Dear Mr. Walch:
' vND SEcno1v
The following is a set of summary tables for the above-referenced site. You will be receiving a
copy of the data sheets early next week. If you have problems regarding the transmittal of this
fax, please contact the undersigned directly at [phone].
Sincerely,
~IJC/\J\_LY'f\ µ. ULti_,(:Yt:'.(K,Gz('.K
Kathryn R. Huibregtse, P.E. I~
Vice President
tls
cc:lboug Moore -NCDENR
Debbie Hastings -JC!
Jane Clokey-Quarles & Brady
RMT, INC.
150 N. PATRICK BLVD.
BROOKFIELD, WI • 53045
414/B/9-1212 • 414/B/9-1220 FAX
G:\ WPMLW\ Pff\OO-Cl4197\03\lA 1970JU.OCX: 10/24/97
•
Table 1
Summary of Sampling Activities
Expanded Site Inspection -August 1997
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. -Winston Salem
Private Wells 2 2
' Surface Water 20(1) 18(1)
Sediment 19(1) 19(1)
Soil 15(2) 13(2)
NOTES:
1 -Two duplicate samples
2 -One duplicate soil sample
Table 2
Testing Programs Summary
Expanded Site Inspection -August 1997
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. -Winston Salem
I : {':.: f'ROGRA¥ DIRECTION '' .'; "a'SAMPLES . ••''-
State of North Carolina 60 Samples
' ,· \•'.?}>,
Volatiles/ Semivolatiles/ Inorganics
Parameters
10 Hazardous Waste Testing Samples
Johnson Controls Battery 3 Volatile/Semivolatile Organics
Group, Inc. 60 Metals
10 Hazardous Waste Testing Samples
20 Suspended Soils/Surface Water
G:\ wpmh,;\pjt\00-04197\03\ T-1197038.0CX: 10/23/98
•·t($:iiiii,leJPWi•c•
JC-OOlCSL (2) NW of facility
JC-101-SL (2) NW of facility
JC-002-SL (1) Acid Storage Tank
JC-003-SL (1) Acid Storage Tank
JC-004-SL (1) Acid Storage Tank
JC-005-SL (1) Acid Storage Tank
JC-006-SL (2) Lead Oxide Unloading
Dock
JC-007-SL (2) Lead Oxide Unloading
Dock
JC-008-SL (2) Drum Storage Area
)C-009-SL (2) Drum Storage Area
JC-010-SL (1) Catch Basin near Acid
Stora ee Tank
JC-011-SL (1) Below Splash Pad at north
end of facility
JC-012-SL (2) Below Splash Pad above
Basin 3
JC-013-SL (2) Below Splash Pad above
Basin 2
Table 3
Expanded Site Inspection -Sampling Observations
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.
Winston-Salem Facility
w•·•.I•Justificatioiiit·• i$aii\iilel\1afrix.\ ••••••·•••····•Aiialvses•i••·•·••·•·· ~ 80N
Background Grab Soil V,S,I, including As planned; heavy organic content
TCLPmetals
Split background to Grab Soil V,S,l, including Duplicate of JC-001-SL
test sample TCLP metals
handling variability
Potential source Grab Soil V,S,I, including Dropped 002 per Doug Moore due to i_nsufficient sampling
and establish TCLP metals equipment
dimensions
Potential source Grab Soil V,S,I, including As.planned; light brown sand silt mix
and establish TCLPmetals
dimensions
Potential source Crab Soil V,S,I, including As planned; slight depression with standing water; light brown clay
and establish TCLP metals with fine silt
dimensions
Potential source Grab Soil V,S,I, including As planned; from front of drainage culvert that flows toward catch
and establish TCLP metals basin that was original JC0l0SL location (need to confirm with Doug
dimensions Moore)
Potential Source Grab Soil V,S,I, including As planned; NCDEHNR mentioned this area looks like it may have
TCLP metals been dredged; sample taken in unvegetative depression; soil dark
brown, mostlv stiff clav
Potential Source Grab Soil V,S,I, including As planned; soil dark brown silty clay with some roots; sample taken
TCLP metals from area of stressed vegetation
Potential Source Grab Soil V,S,l, including As planned; soil medium brown, medium sand
TCLP metals
Potential Source Grab Soil V,S,I, including As planned; sample may have been contaminated when NCDEHNR
TCLP metals personnel inadvertently cut their finger and blood dripped into
mixinP nan
Attribution Grab Soil V,S,I Revise plan due to catch basin having no available solids; moved to
bear spot beside acid storage buildine:; lie:ht brown sandv clav
Attribution and Grab Soil V,S,l As planned; sampled from red clay ditch
Potential Source
Attribution and Grab Soil V,S,l As planned; reddish brown silty clay with fine to medium sand
Potential Source
Attribution and Grab Soil V,S,l As planned; sulfuric acid smell comine from stagnant water at the
Potential Source splash pad above Basin 2; reddish brown medium fine silty sand
with darker orr;anic seams
I:\ WPMLW\Pfl\00--04197\03\ T419703LXls 10/!J/1995
Table 3
Expanded Site Inspection -Sampling Observations
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.
Below Splash Pad above
Basin 1
JC-001-SW /SD (1) UT above confluence of
drainage (ram Basin 1
Attribution and
Potential Source
Background
JC-002-SW /SD (2) Below Spillway of Basin 3 Establish release
for attribution
JC-003-SW /SD (2) Below Spillway of Basin 2 Establish release
for attribution
JC-004-SW /SD (1) Below Spillway of Basin 1 Establish release
for attribution
JC-005-SW /SD (1) From small leachate Establish release
stream of unnamed from GW discharge
tributary of Basin 1 for attribution
JC-006-SW /SD (1) From 300 feet below Establish release
wetland headwater on impacting nearest
unnamed tributary of SW target
Basin 1
JC-106-SW (1) From 300 feet below QA/QC Aqueous
wetland headwater on Duplicate
unnamed tributary of
Basin 1
JC-007-SW /SD (1) From 300 feet below Establish release
wetland headwater on impacting nearest
unnamed tributary of SW target
Basins 2 & 3
Winston-Salem Facility
Grab Soil
Aqueous
Sediment
-Aqueous
·SCdi.ment
Aqueous
Sediment
Aqueous
Sediment
Aqueous
Sediment
Aqueous
Sediment
Aqueous
Sediment
Aqueous
Sediment
V,S,I
V,S,l
V,S,l
V,S,l
V,S,I
V,S,I
V,S,I
As planned; dry, little organic, coarse grained, orange brown in color
As planned; SW sampled from natural depression in spring; SD from
several pointS along background trib.; no H25 odor, fine sand, dark
brown; may have been more appropriate back-ground location in
heavil silted area further u stream
Revised plan; SD taken approx. 300 ft below drainage pipe; SD silty
medium to fine sand, medium clay, medium to dark brown; SW
turbidity affected by rain event {135 NTU), sample rlot taken at this
time; SW sampled ~ 5 hours later (52. 7 NTU); Samples taken below
small trickle of water approx. 100 ft from drainage pipe; ditch has
intermittent flow with several sta nant ools of water
Revised plan; SW not taken because of no flow; SO taken from
several points along drainage ditch; SO micacious, silty, medium to
fine sand, brown red to olive reen in color
As planned; SW collected ~250 ft below basin 1; potential minor
intrusion of creek bottom sediment into SVOC bottle; minor amount
of iron oxidation; SD collected ~15 above SW; sand -silt, olive gray,
H2S odor
Revised plan; low flow; hole dug and allowed to fill and clarify for
several hours before collecting SW; SW with surface film collected by
repetitive dipping (may not be representative of GW); SO collected 5
ft above SW; olive gray sand silt mix; added
VOC/SVOC to SW RMT anal sis
As planned; SW difficult sampling in shallow water; some iron oxide
broke loose in creek due to sampling intrusion; SD high organic
content, olive gray, strong odor of H2S
As planned; same as 006
As planned; heavy iron oxide algae present; low flow out of wetland
area; SD olive gray, fine silt, organics, slight odor; added
VOC/SVOC lo SW RMT analysis
I:\ WPMLW\PTT\00--04197\03\ T419703a.xls 10/?J/1998
t:samiili'IP!f ··•···· illl ....
JC-107-SW (1) From 300 feet below
wetland headwater on
unnamed tributary of
Basins 2 &3
J C-008-SW / SD (1) From Lowery Creek
above the confluence with
unnamed tributary of
Basins 2 & 3
JC-108-SW /SD (1)
JC-009-SW /SD (1) From Lowery Creek
below the confluence with
unnamed tributary of
Basins 2 & 3
JC-010-SW /SD (2) From unnamed tributary
discharging to LoWery
Creek, about 500 feet
below confluence with
Basins 2 & 3 tributary
JC-011-SW /SD (2) From unnamed tributary
discharging to Lowery
Creek, about 1,000 feet
below confluence with
Basins 2 & 3 tributary
JC-012-SW /SD (1) From Lowery Creek
below confluence with
unnamed tributary of
Basin 1
JC-013-SW /SD (2) From unnamed tributary
discharging to north side
of Lowery Creek, about
200 feet below confluence
with Basin 1 tributary
Table 3
Expanded Site Inspection -Sampling Observations
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.
Winston-Salem Facility
j]:{JUSfit1Cati_Oilfll' •••••s•miil~M•tHx ·:•y••·,t·:Ana1vse#:.I·rr•• 00
QA/QC Aqueous Aqueous V,5,1 As planned; same as 007
Duplicate Sediment
Background Aqueous V,S,l As planned; SW from fast flowing Lowery Creek; SW collected in
(double volumes Sediment triplicate for MS/MSD; SD silty with little odor, light olive gray;
for MS/MSD) Split added VOC/SVOC to SW RMT analysis
of sediment to test
sample handling
variability
As olanned; same as 008 (MS/MSD location)
Establish release Aqueous V,S,I As planned; SW from fast flowing Lowery Creek; SD fine silt, olive
from unnamed Sediment gray, moderate organics, slight odor
tributary of Basins
2 & 3 to Lowery
Creek
Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I As planned; SW taken from shallow water near a pool of stagnant
Sediment water; SD taken ~ 5 ft below SW; SD medium brown, some silt, but
mostly fine lo medium sand
Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I As planned; SW from unnamed trib. with intermittent flow; SD olive
Sediment gray and light brown, silty clay with low to medium fine sand, high
organic content
Establish release Aqueous V,S,I As planned; SW from fast flowing Lowery Creek; SO fine sand, olive
from unnamed Sediment gray, high organic content with H2S odor; large population of
tributary of Basin 1 freshwater bivalves noted in creek sediments
to Lowery Creek
Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I_ As planned; SW taken from low flow trib.; SD micacious brown
Sediment clayey silt with some olive brown to medium brown color
I:\ WPMLW\Pfr\00-04197\0'3\ T4l 9703L.xb l0/ZJ/1998
Table 3
Expanded Site Inspection -Sampling Observations
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.
JC-014-SW /SD (1) From unnamed tributary Control Sample
discharging to south side
of Lowery Creek, about
1,000 feet below
confluence with Basin 1
tributar
JC-015-SW /SD (2) From unnamed tributary Control Sample
discharging to north side
of Lowery Creek, about
1,300 feet below
confluence with Basin 1
tributar
JC-016-SW /SD (2) From unnamed tributary Control Sample
discharging to north side
of Salem Lake, about
3,000 feet below
confluence with Basin 1
tributar
JC-017-SW /SD (2) From unnamed tributary Control Sample
discharging to south side
of Salem Lake, about
3,500 feet below
confluence with Basin 1
tributar
JC-018-SW/SD (1) From north side of Old
JC-019-SD (1)
Greensboro Road bridge
over Salem Lake
From north side of Old
Greensboro Road bridge
over Salem Lake
Establish release
impacting nearest
fishery and
addilional wetland
frontage
QA/QC Sediment
Duplicate to test
s atial variabilit
Winston-Salem Facility
Aqueous
Sediment
Aqueous
Sediment
Aqueous
Sediment
Aqueous
Sediment
Aqueous
Sediment
Aqueous
Sediment
V,S,I
V,S,l
V,S,l
V,S,I
V,S,I
As planned; SW in unnamed trib. is fast flowing, approx 100 ft above
wetland; SD brown with heavy organics, no odor
As planned; SW collected from unnamed trib with low flow; SW
taken in shallow water where there was a potential minor intrusion
of creek sediments; SD olive gray to light brown silty to medium
clay; Sample location was in wetland
Revised plan; SW not collected; SD was classified as soil; soil olive
gray with medium brown color, high organic matter
As planned; SW taken from trib. with intermittent Oow; SW collected
in a pool of water; SD collected ~ 25 ft below SW; SD light to
medium brown, medium to fine silt
As planned; SW composted from three intervals across ~ 7 ft water
column; all intervals light brown, turbid; SW collected at heavily
traveled roadside; bottles exposed to vehicle exhaust for ~ 1 hour; SD
collected ~ 200 ft off road in edge of Lowery Creek;
[:\ WPMLW\Pfl\00-04197\03\ T 4l9703ub 10/ZJ/1998
::> Sample JP# ' •· ~
JC-020-SW (2) From Salem Lake DW
raw water intake
JC-021-SW /SD (2) South wing of Salem Lake
at Greensboro Road
bridge
JC-001-PW Peltycord DW well 302
Walkerton-Guthrie Road
JC-002-PW Drinking water well (to be
determined)
JC-001-TB Field Blank
JC-002-TB
JC-001-FB
]C-001-PB
JC-002-PB Post-Preservative Blank
Table 3
Expanded Site Inspection -Sampling Observations
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.
Winston-Salem Facility
.. m.@ifi~atiol\ { i XS11fupl~MA!#i( :::-:-tt,)Aritil -------
Public Health Aqueous V,S,I Revised plar -location changed; NCDEHNR could not get access to
Concern Sediment dam, so SW was collected ~3 ft from shore; NCDEHNR waded out
into Salem Lake with sample containers to collect SW; does not
appear that sediernnt disturbed; SW col1ected ~2-3 inches below
surface
Background for Aqueous V,S,l As planned; SW composite from three intervals across ~7 ft water
JC-018-SW /SD column; SW collected at heavily traveled roadside; bottles exposed to
through vehicular exhaust for ~1 hour; SD olive gray silt with high organic
JC-020-SW /SD content; odor noted
Public Health Aqueous V,5,I As planned; PW purged for 20 min at more than 1 gallon per minute;
Concern no well construction info. available; well completely underground -
not visible
Background Aqueous V,S,l Revise plan; resident not home; mobed to Crew's residence; well is 6
inch diameter; ~100 ft deep, with submersible pump; purged 15
minutes at ~10 gallons per minute
QA/QC Aqueous V As planned
As planned; RMT did not take split
As planned
As planned
QA/QC Aqueous I As planned
•
I:\ WPMLW\Pff\00-04197\0'3\ T4! 970'3a.xls 10/'13/1995
• •
Table 4
Summary of Significant Results -Lead Levels
Expanded Site Inspection -August 1997
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. -Winston Salem
Sediment
Surface Water
Private Wells
Sediment
Surface Water
Soil
..
i FINDINGS Ii ·' . "'
1 of 17 off site sediments
above 300 ppm
(320 ppm at 006SD)
1 of 16 samples
lead detected
(4.1 ,tg/L Pb at 106SW)
(22 mg/LSS)
Lead detected 1 of 2
locations less than DWS
(9.1 µg/L at 001PW)
1 of 2 samples above
300 ppm
(358 ppm at 0045D)
1 of 2 samples
lead detected
(24.4 ttg/L Pb at 004SW)
(23 mg/L SS)
2 samples above
500 ppm
(006 + 007SL)
3 samples between
100-200 ppm
(004, 013, 014SL)
1 hazardous waste
(006SL)
8 samples less than
100ppm
Other samples ranged
from 5 -50 ppm
(5 samples >30 ppm)
Further downstream of
Basin 1 not detected in
duplicate/likely
associated with
entrained soils
Copper pipe suspected
Corresponds to surface
water detection
Immediately
downstream of Basin 1
Lead oxide area east of
plant
G:\ wpmlw\pjt\00--0-I 197\03\ T419703B.IXX 10/23/98
l
I
\
' \
015SW
\ ,
\ 016SD\✓' \ \
017SW ~\
\
I.
\
013SW
012SW
MARTIN
\ 007SW
\ I 107 \ oiosw, ----!_-0~0::8::SW:;;-'" ____ _
011 SW\ ~I \ 108 LOWERY CREEK
/\. ~l 002SW~1~L IE.-
\..,_ • .,osL
Mill CREEK
,. \ I 1 03, 4, SSL ~ 83
001 SL 003SD y--.., •6. 7SL
':,_\ . 101SL o r ~
1
\ :B
9
SS~ ~:~ /// i ,~4sL \_JC! FACILITY 106SW .,..___ __ 005SW
004
sw
·-~----i-'°""--~ 81
• PW-2 LEGEND
-',/_: ~ OLD GREENSBORO ROAD
1.-{o~l~~g:-------...::..:::.._--0
STREAM OR w'.KE
INTERMITANT STREAM
STORM WATER PONO
✓o,a~w
020W ~ 021SW ONLY --~----------~ _ _____,.
SALEM LAKE
NOT TO SCALE
JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.
WINSTON-SALEM, NC
DVN. BY• TCP
APPRGVCD BY,
DATO OCTOBER 1991__
PROJ. # 4197.03
nu: , · 41970301
FIGURE 1
•
Table A-1
Summary of Analytical Results -Private Wells -Metals Analyses
(no field filtering)
[Is -?I•t -INORGANICS
Aluminum <0.0137 B*u <0.0154 B*u
Antimonv <0.0092 <0.0092
Arsenic <0.0041 <0.0041
Barium 0.0313 B 0.0087 B
Bervllium <0.0003 <0.0003
Cadmium <0.0016 <0.0016
Calcium 2.57 B 11.4
Chromium 0.0018 B 0.0017 B
Cobalt <0.0014 Bu <0.001
Cooner 0.508 <0.0127 Bu
Iron <0.0239 Bu <0.0489 Bu
Lead 0.0091 <0.0028
MaITT1esium 1.3 B 4.69 B
Maneanese <0.0081 Bu <0.0014 Bu
Mercurv <0.0002 N <0.0002 N
Nickel 0.0034 B <0.0027
Potassium 1.33 B 1.67 B
Selenium 0.0052 0.0057
Silver <0.0014 <0.0014
Sodium 4.04 B 5.99
Thallium <0.0046 <0.0046
Vanadium <0.0013 0.0017 B
Zinc 0.106 <0.0284 u
(t} Analytical results are reported in milligrams per liter (mg/L) unless otherwise noted.
B -Less than the Contract Required Detection Lim.it but greater than
or equal to the Instrument Detection Limit.
N -Spiked sample recovery not within control limits.
u -Laboratory reported detection not validated during data validation process.
* -Duplicated analysis not within control limits.
< -Concentration hiss than the Contract Required Detection Limit,
or detection not validated if accompanied by "u" qualifier.
I:\ WPMLW\PJT\ 00-04197\ 03\ T4l 9703b.~k\inorganics-pw 10/'23/1998
INORGANICS
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
:t\1angancse
Mercurv
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
TSS
<0.168 B*u
<0.0092
<0.0041
0.0382 B
<0.0003
<0.0016
6.96
0.0022 B
<0.001
<0.0047 Bu
0.339
<0.0028
2.39 B
0.0316
<0.0002 N
<0.0027
1.88 B
<0.0045
<0.0014
5.84
<0.0046
0.0013 B
Table A-2
Summary of Analytical Results -Surface Water -Metals Analyses
(no field filtering)
1.56 * 0.351 * 0.257 <0.17 B*u <0.105 B*u 0.283
<0.0092 <0.0092 <0.0092 <0.0092 <0.0092 <0.0092
<0.0041 <0.0041 <0.0041 <0.0041 0.0042 B <0.0041
O.D15B 0.0357 B 0.0227 B 0.0304 B 0.0694 B 0.0267 B
<0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0003
<0.0016 <0.0016 <0.0016 <0.0016 <0.0016 <0.0016
5.97 5.36 5.93 5.89 8.29 6.1
0.0026 B 0.0033 B 0.0014 B 0.0014 B 0.0047 B <0.0007
<0.0012 Bu <0.0013 Bu <0.0018 Bu <0.0012 Bu <0.0019 Bu <0.0017 Bu
<0.0042 Bu <0.0041 Bu <0.0018 Bu <0.0058 Bu <0.0037 Bu <0.0013 Bu
1.78 0.805 0.262 2.12 13.1 1.25
<0.0028 0.0244 <0.0028 <0.0028 <0.0028 <0.0028
2.07 B 2.39 B 1.76 B 2.26 B 2.38 B 2.34 B
0.423 0.263 0.0065 B 0.346 1.55 0.334
<0.0002 N <0.0002 N <0.0002 <0.0002 N <0.0002 N <0.0002
<0.0027 <0.0027 <0.0027 <0.0027 <0.0027 <0.0027
2.18 B 2.15 B 1.52 B 1.77 B 1.77 B 1.86 B
<0.0045 <0.0045 <0.0045 N <0.0045 <0.0045 <0.0045 N
<0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014
4.17 B 7.46 6.64 6.05 4.31 B 5.01
<0.0046 <0.0056 Bu <0.0067 B*u <0.0046 <0.0046 <0.0054 B*u
0.0053 B 0.0024 B 0.0042 B <0.0013 <0.0013 <0.0013
0.215 *
<0.0092
<0.0041
0.023 B
<0.0003
<0.0016
6.03
0.0019 B
<0.001
<0.0045 Bu
1.27
<0.0028
2.29 B
0.328
<0.0002 N
<0.0027
1.83 B
<0.0045
<0.0014
4.99 B
<0.0046
<0.0013
<0.0075 Bu <0.0091 Bu <0.0155 Bu <0.0046 Bu <0.0097 Bu <0.0072 Bu <0.0052 Bu <0.0071 Bu
<10 19 23 17 10 19
(I) Analytical results are reported in milligrams per liter (mg/ L) unless otherwise noted.
B-Less than the Contract Required Detection Limit but greater than
or equal to the Instrument Detection Limit.
N -Spiked sample recovery not within control limits.
u -Laboratory reported detection not validated during data validation process.
* -Duplicated analysis not within control limits.
< -Concentration less than the Contract Required Detection Limit,
or deicction not validated if acq,mpanied by ftuft qualifier.
<10 <10
<0.126 Bu 0.197 B*
<0.0092 <0.0092
<0.0041 <0.0041
0.0347 B 0.0273 B
<0.0003 <0.0003
<0.0016 <0.0016
5.59 6.03
0.006 B 0.0023 B
<0.001 <0.001
<0.0028 Bu <0.0041 Bu
0.504 0.469
<0.0028 <0.0028
2.55 B 2.88 B
0.0387 0.0177
<0.0002 <0.0002 N
<0.0027 <0.0027
1.57 B 1.41 B
<0.0045 N <0.0045
<0.0014 <0.0014
3.19 B 4.25 B
<0.0046 * <0.0046
<0.0013 0.0023 B
<0.0031 Bu <0.0066 Bu
<10 20
I:\ W PMLW\ PJT\ 0()..04197\ 03\ T 4l 9703b.~b \ inorganics-s w 10/'!3/ I 99S
•
INORGANICS
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
CaJmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
TSS
Table A-2
Summary of Analytical Results -Surface Water -Metals Analyses
( no field filtering)
<0.143 B*u .<0.146 B*u 0.899 * 0.399 * 0.216 * 0.582 *
<0.0092 <0.0092 <0.0092 <0.0092 <0.0092 <0.0092
<0.0041 <0.0041 <0.0041 <0.0041 <0.0041 <0.0041
0.0223 B 0.0212 B 0.0469 B 0.0368 B 0.0305 B 0.0268 B
<0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0003
<0.0016 <0.00lfi <IJ.Olllfi <0.()(rlfi <0.0016 <0.0016
6.2 5.98 6.93 7.22 7.63 6.21
0.00092 B 0.0017 B 0.003 B 0.0066 B 0.002 B 0.0023 B
<0.001 <0.001 <0.0024 Bu <0.0013 Bu <0.001 <0.001
<0.0036 Bu <0.0035 Bu <0.0054 Bu <0.0047 Bu <0.0044 Bu <0.0051 Bu
1.19 0.426 1.64 2.13 0.309 2.39
<0.0028 <0.0028 <0.0028 <0.0028 <0.0028 <0.0028
2.36 B 2.88 B 3.01 B 3.22 B 3.37 B 2.45 B
0.333 0.038 0.124 0.109 0.0156 0.311
<0.0002 N <0.0002 N <0.0002 N <0.0002 N <0.0002 N <0.0002 N
<0.0027 <0.0027 <0.0027 <0.0027 <0.0027 <0.0027
1.76 B 1.54 B 4.01 B 1.63 B 1.51 B 1.91 B
<0.0045 0.0061 <0.0045 <0.0045 <0.0045 <0.0045
<0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014
5.13 4.97 B 5.51 4.19 B 4.48 B 5.3
<0.0046 <0.0052 Bu <U.0046 <0.0046 <0.0046 <0.0046
<0.0013 0.0014 B 0.0038 B 0.0015 B <0.0013 0.0026 B
<0.0052 Bu <0.0056 Bu <0.0102 Bu <0.0079 Bu <0.0111 Bu <0.0087 Bu
<10 <10 25 17 <10 25
(I) Analytical results are reported in milligrams per liter (mg/L) unless otherwise noted.
B -Less than the Contract Required Detection Limit but greater than
or equal to the Instrument Detection Limit.
N -Spiked sample recovery not within control limits.
u -Laboratory reported detection not validated during data validation process.
" -Duplicated analysis not within control limits.
< -Concentration less than the Contract Required Detection Limit,
or detection not validated if accompanied by "u" qualifier.
<0.113 B*u 0.326 *
<0.0092 <0.0092
<0.0041 0.0049 B
0.0141 B 0.0243 B
<0.0003 <0.0003
<0.0016 <0.0016
5.87 7.06
0.0011 B 0.0028 B
<0.001 <0.001
<0.0048 Bu <0.0053 Bu
0.174 1.28
<0.0028 <0.0028
2.25 B 2.56 B
0.0445 0.142
<0.0002 N <0.0002 N
<0.0027 <0.0027
2.16 B 2.19 B
<0.0045 <0.0045
<0.0014 <0.0014
6.07 8.15
<0.0046 <0.0046
<0.0013 0.002 B
<0.0078 Bu <0.0071 Bu
<10 15
0.226 * <0.0659 B*u
<0.0092 <0.0092
<0.0041 <0.0041
0.0303 B 0.108 B
<0.0003 <0.0003
<0.0016 <0.0016
5.78 8.36
0.0018 B 0.0011 B
<0.001 <0.0021 Bu
<0.0048 Bu <0.0036 Bu
2.34 12.2
0.0041 <0.0028
2.21 B 2.42 B
0.348 1.57
<0.0002 N <0.0002 N
<0.0027 <0.0027
1.74 B 1.73 B
<0.0045 0.0049 B
<0.0014 <0.0014
5.58 4.09 B
<0.0046 <0.0046
0.0019 B <0.0013
<0.008 Bu <0.0057Bu
22 20
I;\ WPMLW\Pff\00-04197\03\ T41970'.3b.xls\inorganl~sw !0/2'J/l 99S
•
Table A-3
Summary of Analytical Results -Sediment Samples -Metals Analyses
[fil~~mTh!'lI l1jfjf > lg;i\;&~ Ii!~lJI • .. !Wtfii; t0g;l~~fi •.• !~½°~~ r i~i;.~~? ~gJt~fiI J1!~i i Ii~J~
INORGANICS
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Bcrvllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Coooer
Iron
Lead
Marnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Solids (percent)
11100 6070 5430
<3.1 N <2.9N <2.7 N
<1.4 <1.3 <1.2
99.9 118 49.4 B
0.91 B 0.48 B 0.52 B
<0.55 <0.50 <0.47
692 B 555 B 220 B
24.0 13.2 14.1
6.6 B 15.1 B 4.3 B
13.9 6.8 B 7.1 B
15700 13900 12300
12.8 16.2 54.0
1440 B 1840
385 Ni 4670 Ni 436 Ni
<0.17 <0.16 <0.15
9.6 B 4.6B 4.0 B
3880 1410 B 2190
<1.5 N 4.3 N <1.3 N
<0.48 <0.44 <0.41
<46.3 <42.4 <40.2
1.8 B 1.8 B <1.4
33.1 20.0 21.3
39.1 57.2 77.8
58.7 64.1 67.7
7670 3280
<3.2N <2.8N
<1.4 <1.2
78.3 37.3 B
0.77 B 0.62 B
<0.55 <0.48
729 B 787 B
23.2 15.6 E
3.7 B 2.0 B
10.4 4.8 B
9660 4320
358 7.2
2620 1300B
126 Nj 51.4 j
<0.17 <0.15 N
6.3 B 6.6 B
2560 812B
<1.6 N <1.4 N
<0.48 <0.42
<46.9 88.9 B
<1.6 1.7 B
29.1 12.9 B
44.6 15.8
58.0 66.1
23900
<8.3N
6.7 B
244
1.8 B
<1.4
1650 B
53.3
22.8 B
29.9
69100
320
4010 B
1450 Ni
<0.45
15.2 B
3300 B
<4.1 N
<1.3
124 B
<4.1
79.4
113
22.2
<1l Analytical results are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/Kg) unless otherwise noted.
B -Less than the Contract Required Detection Limit but greater than
or equal to the Instrument Detection Limit.
j -Concentration considered an estimate based on data validation.
N -Spiked sample recovery not within control limits .
.. -Duplicated analysis not within control limits.
< -Concentration less than the Contract Required Detection Limit.
22800 9420 12400 5430
<6.0N <3.1 N <4.1 N <2.6N
6.6 <1.4 2.1 B <1.1
203 84.6 124 57.4
1.8 B 0.84 B 1.1 B 0.84 B
<1.0 <0.55 <0.71 <0.45
1350B 534 B 814 B 284 B
39.1 20.1 29.1 20.6
11.5 B 6.8 B 10.2 B 6.0 B
22.1 9.1 15.0 11.9
86500 16100 25500 10300
39.1 9.9 15.2 5.2
2970 B 2260 2910 1360 B
704 Ni 423 Nj 739Nj 216 Ni
<0.33 <0.17 <0.22 <0.14
8.8 B 5.9 B 8.5 B 4.5 B
2130 B 1940 2440 1050 B
<2.9N 2.2N <2.0N <1.3 N
<0.92 <0.48 <0.62 <0.39
129 B <46.5 <60.7 ,58.6 B
4.4 B 1.9 B <2.1 1.9 B
71.9 30.8 44.3 25.1
79.9 37.5 58.6 22.0
30.6 58.5 44.8 71.6
I:\ WPMLW\Pfl\00-04197\03\ T-t19703b.xls\inorr,anie"5. sd 10/"1.'3/199S
•
•
Table A-3
Summary of Analytical Results -Sediment Samples -Metals Analyses
PARAMETER((). • lC:QHSI}. 1c:0125p rn:opsp JC:Cl1.4SP . JCOWSP ·.·.•.1 ... S()}~SP .... ·.·.··•· .. · .. · J<;:QJTSP J<:;9WSP JC:QJ!IS.P Jc:0.2JSP JC:108SPt > !8/12/97 .. s/iZf-!i ... s/iz,"Ji L •·· . s/iZf-!i n • 8/12/97' s11219z s/J.21'J1 > s111197 s/iifaz .. sfiijijz .. u s;i21h r
INORGANICS
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Bcrvllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Conner
Iron
Lead
MaITT1esium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Solids (oercent)
7390 10700 5050 13700 9350 25300 4300
<3.0N <3.1 N <2.6N <4.4 N <3.5 N <6.1 N <2.6N
<1.3 <1.4 <1.2 <2.0 3.4 B 6.6 B 1.5 B
55.5 B 104 48.5 B 186 91.1 185 33.4 B
0.52 B 0.81 B 0.54 B 1.7 B 0.83 B 1.8 B 0.50 B
<0.52 <0.54 <0.45 <0.77 <0.60 <1.1 <0.44
496 B 414 B 241 B 2160 B 735 B 1020 B 323 B
22.1 25.3 15.2 47.8 22.0 43.9 30.0
12.4 B 7.6 B 4.2 B 14.2 B 7.0 B 13.9 B 18.0
9.0 11.3 4.2 B 19.2 11.3 31.0 6.2 B
13200 19200 9340 23700 22800 38000 12400
6.4 12.5 3.9 17.9 12.0 45.1 7.6
1590 B 3130 1280 B 4970 1700 B 3180 B 736 B
297 Ni 363 Ni 326 Nj 867Ni 460Nj 827Nj 666 Ni
0.25 <0.17 <0.14 <0.24 <0.19 <0.33 <0.14
13.4 7.8 B 3.3 B 17.3 B 5.9 B 15.2 B 3.5 B
1200 B 2840 938 B 3730 1290 B 2480 B 525 B
<1.5 N <1.5 N 1.9N 2.4 N <1.7 N <3.0N 1.9 N
<0.46 <0.47 <0.40 <0.67 <0.53 <0.92 0.69 B
<44.3 <45.6 <38.4 <65.4 <51.2 <89.8 <37.8
<1.5 <1.5 <1.3 <2.2 <1.7 <3.0 <1.3
29.2 36.1 18.1 52.0 33.9 90.1 40.5
27.1 46.5 13.5 56.7 44.9 68.0 10.1
61.4 59.6 70.8 41.6 53.1 30.3 72.0
{t) Analytical results are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/Kg) unless otherwise noted.
B -Less than the Contract Required Detection Limit but greater than
or equal to the Instrument Detection Limit.
j -Concentration considered an estimate based on data validation.
N -Spiked sample recovery not within control limits.
• -Duplicated analysis not within control limits.
< -Concentration less than the Contract Required Detection Limit.
22700 18300 26900 9760
<5.0N <4.8 N <5.3 N <3.1 N
4.0 B 3.7 B 3.2 B 2.4 B
181 158 219 90.7
1.9 B 1.6 B 1.6 B 0.89 B
<0.86 <0.83 <0.92 <0.54
1200 B 1020 B 1000 B 548 B
44.6 37.6 46.0 21.2
11.6 B 10.5 B 16.6 B 7.0 B
24.1 20.4 32.0 9.4
30300 26000 28400 17000
33.2 28.9 34.7 11.2
3910 3410 4310 2410
443 Ni 435 Nj 442 Nj 429Ni
<0.27 <0.26 <0.29 <0.17
12.5 B 10.2 B 15.0 B 6.0 B
2910 2600 B 3130 2090
<2.4 N <2.3 N <2.6N <1.5 N
<0.75 <0.73 <0.81 <0.47
<73.3 <70.8 <78.4 <46.0
<2.5 <2.4 <2.7 1.6 B
74.5 63.1 77.9 32.2
87.7 73.3 99.8 39.3
37.1 38.4 34.7 59.1
I:\ WPMLW\Pn\00--04197\03\ HJ 9703b.xls\innrr,ani<'s -sd 10/23/1993
•
•
INORGANICS
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Bervllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Ma ITTiesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Table A-4
Summary of Analytical Results -Soil Samples -Metals Analyses
8220 12200 20200 19600 18300 16300
<2.4 N <2.6N <2.8N <3.0N <3.0N <2.7N
1.4 B 2.0 B 2.8 B 3.4 4.5 3.5
73.1 88.5 134 121 120 112
0.60 B 0.79 B 1.3 B 0.50 B 0.90 B 0.63 B
<0.42 <0.46 <0.50 <0.52 0.84 B <0.47
402 B 1990 1600 5820 6330 1270 B
24.4 E 30.3 E 35.6 E 31.6 E 37.6 E 25.3 E
9.7 B 10.2 B 14.4 B 8.6 B 13.4 B 13.1 B
17.9 30.1 41.0 48.6 35.6 24.2
12900 26800 32500 29100 38800 26000
.23.1 9.9 130 23.8 2750 1370
1870 6290 4500 4830 3730 3580
304 589 1030 405 807 863
<0.13 N <0.14 N <0.15 N <!J:16N <0.16 N <0.15 N
6.5 B 15.5 17.7 13.3 16.3 13.3
1320 B 2800 3150 4440 3030 3700
<1.2N <1.3 N <1.4 N <1.5 N 1.8 N <1.3 N
<0.37 <0.40 <0.43 <0.46 <0.46 <0.41
<36.0 321 B 74.3 B 91.0 B 887 B <40.1
2.8 4.3 6.3 2.1 B 2.9 B 3.0
30.7 65.6 72.7 65.8 86.4 49.4
24.1 55.8 128 64.3 247 111
(I) Am,lylio:il results are rcporled in milligrnms per kilogram (mg/Kg) unless otherwise noted.
B-Less than the Contract Required Detection Limit but grentC!r than
or equal to the Instrument Detection Limit.
E -Estimated concentration because of the presence of interference.
N -Spiked sample recovery not wi~hin control limits.
* -Duplicated analysis not within control limits.
< -Concentration less than the Contract Required Detection Limit.
13500 9640
<2.0N <2.4 N
1.4 B 2.4 B
138 104
0.78 B 0.62 B
<0.35 <0.41
538 B 509 B
18.9 E 14.1 E
9.9 B 8.1 B
22.0 14.7
22300 16000
64.0 62.5
3900 2860
1120 892
<0.11 N <0.13 N
12.7 10.3
4600 3220
<0.98 N <1.2N
<0.30 2.8
<29.6 <34.8
2.6 1.9 B
37.5 29.7
60.9 56.0
I:\ WPMLW\Pff\00-04197\03\ Hl 9703b.xls\inorganics-sl 10/'!3/1993_
•
•
Table A-4
Summary of Analytical Results -Soil Samples -Metals Analyses
INORGANICS
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Conner
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Se]cnium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
15400 10700 14800 10700 10300 7680
<2.8N <2.7N <2.9N <2.5 N <2.4 N <2.3N
2.8 B 1.9 B 3.0 B 2.0 B 1.3 B 1.6 B
101 74.2 106 59.6 71.8 64.2
0.73 B 0.66 B 0.87B 0.54 B 0.66 B 0.59 B
<0.50 <0.48 <0.51 1.9 <0.41 <0.41
1020 B 644 B 1080 B 479 B 430 B 304 B
28.6 E 16.7E 22.5 E 20.6 E 22.4 E 21.1 E
11.9 B 6.4 B 13.5 B 4.7 B 10.0B 8.7 B
19.2 8.6 20.1 13.5 13.3 14.7
23400 16600 27200 16400 16700 12000
33.7 44.3 48.2 137 175 16.6
2220 1410 B 2810 1800 2460 1710
709 451 1180 211 551 240
<0.15 N <0.15 N <0.16 N <0.14 N <0.13 N <0.13 N
13.5 5.8 B 12.4 B 6.7 B 9.8 B 6.6 B
2150 1410 B 3190 2060 2500 1200 B
<1.4 N <1.3 N <1.4 N <1.2 N 1.2BN <1.1 N
<0.43 <0.42 <0.44 1.1 B <0.36 <0.36
<42.1 49.9 B <43.1 <36.9 <34.8 74.3 B
2.8 B 3.9 3.0 B 2.9 1.2 B 2.5 B
48.6 34.6 52.5 34.0 34.7 27.6
511 26.3 187 223 53.1 23.0
(tJ Analytical results are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/Kg) unless otherwise noted.
B -Less than the Contract Required Detection Limit but greater than
or equal to the Instrument Detection Limit.
E-Estimated concentration because of the presence of interference.
N -Spiked sample recovery not within control limits.
• -Duplicated analysis not within control limits.
< -Concentration less than the Contract Required Detection Limit.
!:\ WPMLW\PJT\00-04197\0'3\ T 419703b.>:ls\inorganics-sl 10/'n/t 9<18
•
•
• •
Table A-5
Summary of Analytical Results for Volatile Organic Compounds
Chloromcthane <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Brom om ethane <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
V invl chloride <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Chloroethane <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Methvlene chloride <0.0004Ju <0.00027 Ju <0.00048 Ju
Acetone <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Carbon disulfide <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
1, 1-Dichloroethene <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
1, 1-Dichloroethane <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
1,2-Dichloroethcne, total <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Chloroform <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
1,2-Dichloroethane <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
2-Butanone <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Carbon tetrachloride <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Bromodichloromcthane <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
1,2-Dichloropropane <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
cis-1,3-Dichlorooropenc <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Trichloroethene <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Dibromochloromethane <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane <0.0"1 <0.()1 <0.01
Benzene <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
trans-1,3-DichlorovroPcnc <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Bromoform <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
4-M ethvl-2-p enta none <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
2-Hexanone <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Tctrachloroethcnc <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
1, 1,2,2-Tctrachloroethanc <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Toluene <0.01 0.00092J <0.()1
Chlorobenzene <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Ethvlbcnzcne <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Slvrcnc <0.()1 <0.01 <0.01
Xvlenes, total <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
(J) Analytical results arn reported in milligrams per liter (mg/L) unless otherwise noted.
B -Present in analytical method blank.
J -Estimated concentration.
u -Laboratory reported detection not validated during data validation process.
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.0013 J
0.003 1B
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0'°1
<O.O"l
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0-1
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.0"1
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
< -Concentration less than the Quantitation Limit, or detection not validated if accompanied by ~uM qualifier.
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
0.0012 l
0.0061 1B
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
I:\ WPMLW\PJT\00-~l 'l'7\ 03\ T419703b.Kls\ volt\tilea 10/'23/ 1998
Table A-6 • Summary of Analytical Results for Semivolatile Organic Compounds
Phenol <0.011 <0.01
bis(2-Chloroethvl)ether <0.011 <0.01
2-Chlorovhenol <0.011 <0.01
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.011 <0.01
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0,011 <0.01
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.011 <0.01
2-Methvlvhcnol <0.011 <0.01
2, 2' -oxv bis{1-Chloropropanc) <0.011 <0.01
4-Methvlohenol <0.011 <0.01
N-Nitrosodi-n-oronvlamine <0.011 <0.01
Hexachlorocthanc <0.011 <0.01
Nitrobenzene <0.011 <0.01
Isoohorone <0.011 <0.01
2-Nitroohcnol <0.011 <0.01
2,4-Dimethvlvhenol <0.011 <0.01
bis/2-Chloroethoxvlmcthane <0.011 <0.01
2,4-Dichloroohenol <0.011 <0.01
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.011 <0.01
Naohlhalcne <0.011 <0.01
4-Chloroaniline <0.011 <0.01
Hexachlorobutadienc <0.011 <0.01
4-Chloro-3-methvlphcnol <0.011 <0.01
2-Mcthvlnanhthalcnc <0.011 <0.01
Hexachlorocvclooentadiene <0.011 <0.01
2,4,6-T richloroohenol <0.011 <0.01
2,4,5-T richlorophenol <0.026 <0.025
2-Chloronanhthalene <0.011 <0.01
2-Nitroanilinc <0.026 <0.025
Dimethvlvhthalate <0.011 <0.01
Acenaphthvlene <0.011 <0.01
2,6-Dinitrotoluene <0.011 <0.01
3-Nitroanilinc <0.026 <0.025
Acenaphlhcne <o.on <0.01
2,4-Dinitrophenol <0.026 <0.025
4-Nitroohenol <0.026 <0.025
Dibenzofu ran <0.011 <0.01
2,4-Dinitrotoluene <0.011 . <0.01
Diethvlnhthalate <0.0014 JBu <0.0016 IBu
4-Chloroohenvl-ohenvlclher <0.011 <0.01
Fluorcnc <0.011 <0.01
4-Nitroanilinc <0.026 <0.025.
4,6-Dinitro-2-methvlohcnol <0.026 <0.025
{l) Analytical results are reported in milligrams pm liter (mg/ L) unless othernrise noted.
B -Present in analytical method blank.
J -Estimated concentration.
u -Laborntory reported detection not valid.1ted during data validation process.
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.026
<0.011
<0.026
<0.011
<0.011
<0.011
<0.026
<0.011
<0.026
<0.026
<0.011
<0.011
<0.0012 )Bu
<0.011
<0.011
<0.026
<0.026
< -Concentration less than the Quantitation Limit, or detection not validated if «ccompanied by "ult qualifier.
N-Nilrosodivhenvlaminc <0.011 <0.01 . <0.011
4-Bromoohcnvl-phenvlclher <0.011 <0.01 <0.011
Hexachlorobenzcne <0.011 <0.01 <0.011
Pcntachlorophenol <0.026 <0.025 <0.026
I:\ WPMLW\PfT\00-04197\03\ T419703b.~ls\aemivolatilt!5 10/'23/1998
• Table A-6
Summary of Analytical Results for Semivolatile Organic Compounds
Phenanthrene <0.011 <0.01 <0.011
Anthracene <0.011 <0.01 <0.011
Di-n-but I hthalate <0.011 <0.0012 Bu <0.0012 Bu
Carbazole <0.011 <0.01 <0.011
Fluoranthene <0.011 <0.01 <0.011
<0.011 <0.01 <0.011
I hthalatc <0.011 <0.01 <0.011
<0.011 <0.01 <0.011
Be anthracene <0.011 <0.01 <0.011
Ch <0.011 <0.01 <0.011
bis thalate <0.011 0.0016 <0.011
<0.011 <0.01 <0.011
Ben ne <0.011 <0.01 <0.011
Ben ne <0.011 <0.01 <0.011
<0.011 <0.01 <0.011
rene <0.011 <0.01 <0.011
Dib ene <0.011 <0.01 <0.011
Ben ne <0.011 <0.01 <0.011
(t) Analytical results are reported in milligrams per liter (mg/L) ~nless otherwise noted.
B • Present in analytical method blank
J • Estimated concentration.
u -L,boratory reported detection not validated during data validation process.
< • Concentration less than the Quantitation Limit, or detection not validated if accompanied by "u" qualifier.
I:\ WPMLW\Pff\00.0-i\ 97\0'3\ T419703b.xls\semivol11tile.s 10/'13/1998
• •
Table A-7
Summary of Analytical Results -Quality Control Samples -Metals Analyses
INORGANICS
Aluminum 0.0328 B 0.0381 B <0.0131 *
Antim·onv <0.0092 <0.0092 <0.0092
Arsenic <0.0041 <0.0041 <0.0041
Barium <0.0002 0.00022 B 0.00026 B
Bervllium <0.0003 <0.0003 <0.0003
Cadmium <0.0016 <0.0016 <0.0016
Calcium 0.0212 B 0.0326 B · 0.154 B
Chromiun1 <0.0007 <0.0007 <0.0007
Cobalt 0.0027 B <0.001 <0.001
Conner 0.0009 B 0.0012 B 0.0028 B
Iron 0.0188 B <0.0151 <0.0151
Lead <0.0028 <0.0028 <0.0028
Ma~ncsium <0.0071 <0.0071 0.0199 B
Manrranese <0.0002 <0.0002 0.0007 B
Mercurv <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 N
Nickel <0.0027 <0.0027 <0.0027
Potassium 0.0392 B 0.035 B 0.0425 B
Selenium <0.0045 N <0.0045 N <0.0045
Silver <0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014
Sodium <0.136 <0.136 0.476 B
Thallium, <0.0046 * 0.007 B* 0.0063 B
Vanadium <0.0013 <0.0013 <0.0013
Zinc · 0.0031 B 0.0042 B · 0.0057 B
(1) Analytical results are reported in milligrams per liter (mg/ L) unless otherwise noted.
B -Less than the Contract Required Detection Limit but greater than
or equal to the Instrument Detection Limit.
N -Spiked sample recovery not within control limits.
* -Duplicated analysis not within control limits.
< -Concentration less than the Contract Required Detection Limit.
I:\ WPMLW\Pff\00-04197\03\ T41970'3b.d:i\inorganictl-qc 10/ZJ/ i 99S
Ms. Debbie I-lastings
Johnson Controls
5757 North Green Bay Avenue
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53209
.0GR4c FIC.G
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
October 13, 1998
RE: Johnson Controls/Globe Battery Site
Winston-Salem, Forsyth Co. North Carolina
NCO 000 770 487
Dear Ms. I-lastings:
Mr. Douglas Moore of the Superfund Section's Site Evaluation & Removal
Branch has recently indicated that the site is currently under review by the federal
Superfund Program for possible inclusion on the USEPA's National Priorities List
(NPL). Until the USEPA's next course of action is determined and to avoid
unnecessary expenditures from a duplication of work by Johnson Controls, it may
not be appropriate for this site to enter into the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch's
voluntary cleanup program at this time. Prior to proceeding with any voluntary
remedial action under the Inactive Hazardous Sites Program, it may be advisable
for Johnson Controls to contact the USEPA directly to discuss the future of this
site under the federal Superfund Program.
Please also be advised that because of the severity of this site, the site may
not be eligible for participation in the Registered Environmental Consultant (REC)
Program. If the site is not eligible for the REC Program, any voluntary cleanup
action must be performed under direct state oversight. If you have any other
questions about the site's status under the federal Superfund Program, please
contact Mr. Phil Vorsatz of the USEPA at [phone]. If there are questions
about the site's status under the Inactive Hazardous Sites Program, please contact
me at (919) 733-280 I, ext. 282.
cc: T. Gustafson, RMT, Inc.
D. Moore, NC DWM
P Vorsatz, USEPA
Kt:ii.JLL
Vohn W Walch
Environmental Engineer
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
Superfund Section
401 08ERLIN ROAD, SUITE 150, RALEIGH, NC 27605
PHONE 919·733-4996 FAX 919·715-3605
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
J~HNSON
CONTR~LS
Dear Mr. Walch:
Johnson Controls, Inc.
BatteryA,p
5757 N.Wen Bay Avenue
Post Office Box 591
Milwaukee, WI 53201-0591
Tel. [phone]
RECEI\/En
SEP 2 2 1998
SUPERFUND SECTION
Mr. John Walch
N. Carolina Dept of Environment
and Natural Resources
401 Oberlin Road
PO Box 150
Raleigh, NC 27605
September 17, 1998
Re: JCBGI -Winston -Salem: Request for Eligibility in the Registered Environmental
Consultant Voluntary Clean Up Program
Please find enclosed Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. (JCBGI) -Winston-Salem's checklist
for Registered Environmental Consultant (REC) Program Eligibility. JCBGI requests that the
Winston-Salem site be reviewed for transfer into the REC voluntary remedial action clean up
program. If JCBGI is allowed into this program RMT, Inc. North Carolina would be the REC and
Timothy J. Gustafson, RMT, Inc., would be the Registered Site Manager (RES). To assist JCBGI
in quickly responding to requests, we ask that all future correspondence be addressed to both
Timothy Gustafson and myself. RMT's address is as follows:
RMT, Inc. North Carolina
100 Verdae Boulevard
Greenville, South Carolina
29607-3825
864-281-0030
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely,
JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY GROUP INC.
Debbie Hastings, CHMM
Senior Environmental Engineer
•
Checklist for Registered Environmental Consultant (REC) Program Eligibility
Note: An affirmativC response to any of these questions does not automatically preclude a site from an REC-supervised remedial action. However. the state has the complete discretion to oversee site remedial actions directly. If the state elects to directly oversee a remedial action, the volunteer is not required to hire an REC.
I. Are contaminated soils, wastes, surface water or sediments readily accessible
to the public?
2. Can site access be easily controlled?
3. Are hazardous vapors, air emissions or contaminated dust migrating into occupied
residential, commercial or industrial areas?
4. Have hazardous substances migrated off-site at concentrations in excess of Branch
unrestricted-use remediation goals (see section D.2 ofREC implementation guidance)?
5. Has groundwater contamination affected any drinking-water wells?
J. Has the local community expressed concerns about contamination at the site?
7. Are there any sensitive environments located on the property (sensitive environments
are identified in section .0306(g)(7) of the REC implementation guidance)?
8.
9.
10.
If yes, please explain on a separate page.
Has contamination from the site migrated into any sensitive environments?
If yes, please explain on a separate page.
Do site contaminants include radioactive or mixed radioactive and chemical wastes?
Is the site located on or immediately adjacent to residential property, schools,
day-care centers or other sensitive populations?
Page 1 of3
Check here if attachments for items 7 and 8 are included.
Circle One
Y@
0N
y @
y @
y @
y @
y@
•
Remediating Party Certification Statement
I hereby certify that the responses provided above are, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for willfully submitting false, inaccurate or incomplete information.
Debbie J. Hastings
(Printed Name and Title ofRemediating Party Representative)
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.
(Printed Name of Company)
Wisconsin
(State in which signature is witnessed)
Milwaukee County
I, ..Joi,." C.. $'~' C , a Notary Public of said County and State, do hereby cenify that
J)z hb>--j · f-k,_.,-1;1~l did personally appear and sign before me this the -11._ day of 5'.r:if , I 99[ v --t,~-~
(OFFICIAL SEAL)
My commission expires:
Page 2 of3
•
Registered Site Manager Certification Statement
I hereby certify that the responses provided above are, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for willfully submitting false, inaccurate or incomplete information.
Timothy Gustafson
(Printed Name of Registered Site Manager)
RMT, Inc. -North Carolina
(Printed Name of Registered Environmental Consultant)
Sou th Carolina
(Stale in which signature is witnessed)
Greenville County
I, Debbie D. Hartley, a Notary Public of said County and State, do hereby certify that
Timothy Gustafson didpersonallyappearandsignbeforemethisthe~dayof Sept. , 199~.
(OFFICIAL SEAL)
Page 3 of3
' lbrrhw 'tlv1't_1i.A
G •
o 21-S""
I R081121A 80°09'30.9835 36° 06'23 .1723 -'.)i• Aug II, 1997 21:31:43'_::il•"l'\·Sr:>
2 COS! 12 IA 80° 10'33.4370 36°06'47.8242 Aug II, 1997 21:20:12 ~
3 C0812138 80° 10'17.3169 36°06'55.0903 Aug 12, 1997 13:33:43' :w i':-sw
4 R081212A 80° I I '31.5901 36° 05'44.8391 Aug 12, 1997 12:17:30-SC-~1t,,SI>
5 R0812198 80° I 0'24. 7869 36° 06'56.2085 ,Jl -Aug 12, 1997 19:33:43 o0~-sD
6 RQ81315A 80° 09'45. 7976 36°07'10.7283 Aug 13, 1997 15:16:22'1<,, a,'2--~"'/sl>
7 R0813168 80° 09'46.3028 36° 07' 15.5042 Aug 13, 1997 16:28:43 ,:5t,•
8 R0813128 80°09'54.701 l 36° 07'27.5558 Aug 13, 1997 12:35:34-Jl.-"OI-SL
9 R081322A 80° 09'3 7 .9845 36° 07' 14. 7170 012-H Aug I 3, I 997 22:04:58 -:1<-
10 C081322A 80° 09'34.0045 36°07'10.6937 Aug 13, 1997 22:32:26-1£-eo-.-SL-.
I I C081321A 80° 09'34.6903 36° 07' 11.3 720 Aug 13, 1997 21 :57:08 -~ 1!,«s,,,., ·
12 C081323A 80° 09'32. 7448 36°07'1 l.3518 Aug 13, 1997 23 :03 :54 -:]",-cos· c;1,.
13 ROSI 323A 80° 09'33.5451 36° 07'07. 7968 JC oc:>1,·SL Aug 13, 1997 23:04:42--
14 R081400A 80° 09'33.5860 36° 07'06.0996 -J<· a,-r-$1-Aug 14, 1997 00:35:53 ~L
15 R0814008 80° 09'34.3800 36° 07'03.4233
..,, .
Aug 14 1997 00:51:23•l<·
16 COSl 3218 80°09'33.5910 36°07']0.4644 ' 'f(,OIO-SL Aug I 3, 1997 21 :39:40-$L
17 C081320A 80° 09'33 .6987 36°07'14.2359 1,-011-Aug I 3, I 997 20:21 :48 -SL
18 R081316b 80° 09'50.2103 36°07'10.2681 I?,. Aug 13, 1997 16:04:05 -<t<-0
19 C081319A 80° 09'42.8672 36° 06'59.0810 'J'l -011\•',,I-Aug I 3, I 997 20:03 :06 -i..<;,,,/SP
20 C0813 l 5A 80° 09'48.5482 36°06'57.6964 ;<·lD Aug 13, 1997 15:12:27-oo't°'.itsr>
21 C081314A 80°09'47.3982 36° 06'57.8923 -1'" Aug 13, 1997 14: 18:06 ,;-s...,/sl:>
22 COS! 312A 80°09'53.1153 36° 07'01.0918 ;:ic-o• Aug 13, 1997 12:53:48-""~_,...,(sb
23 c9s1216A 80° 10'03.8301 36° 07'06. l 066 Aug 12, I 997 I 6:21: 12 -l'' l•o
/24 C081221A ! jl•Oo1· sw
25 C081220A 80°09'56.45 l 9 36° 07'24.0550 Aug 12, 1997 ,,d/-sw/rD
20:25:42-:ll'" Sw l<b
26 R0813138 80° I O'O 1.6990 36° 07'23 .2344 Aug 13, 1997 :ll· 010-13:29:25· 11-sw/<)
27 R081222A 80° 10'05.7630 36°07'18.3383 Aug 12, I 997 J£..-0 22:26:44 -,i-,.,..,,1>
28 C081215A 80° 10'09.9441 36° 07'03 .6955 Aug 12, 1997 'lC."'0 15: 13: 04 -11 . ,..., I g,
29 R081220A 80° 1 O' 12.2702 36°07'10.2783 Aug 12, 1997 20'638'"(,-0 j<I> :_, : t<t .. S'-'
30 C~A 80° I 0'17.1550 36°06'57.4878 Aug 12, 1997 .,, -SC.• 0
13:12:22 •t-ofrwl<JI
31 ROS A 80° I 0'24.4099 36°06'58.8068 Aug 12, 1997 15:45:05 ,> -,.~vJSI>
32 R081213A 80° 10'39.7942 36° 06'56.6949 Aug 12, 1997 13:33:38 '1 '' O\
✓33 COS! I I SA I g, (VIS!)
34 C081 l l 88 80° I 0'38.5766 36° 06'46.1126 Aug 11, 1997 _ 1t-" 18:40:00 ~L
35 R081401A 80°09'33.3425 36° 07'04.7055 Aug 14, 1997 01 :48:32 ("l(,•60'!-
c)0!( ·<=/<0 36 C081223A 80°09'52.3633 36° 07'26.6824 Aug 12, 1997 23: 19:07· !<-
t ot.f,S...,
C0811 I 8A 1652233.1844 862034. 7161 80° 10'38.5315 36° 06'46.1748 Aug 1118:37:451997-"li-oD,,,_s.,,/st>
C081221 A 1656083.0168 865924.0198 80°09'52.1712 36° 07'25.0825 Aug 12 21:15:57 1997-~-I St-
A' .e'.081312B 1655869.8404 866179.5095 80°09'54.8060 36° 07'27.5841 'jl,e,D.,.. Aug 13 12:35:34 1997-_c,P.J-~
,e. .e'08 l 3 l 5A 1656589.6818 864464.2923 80° 09'45. 7875 36°07'10.7070 Aug 13 15: 16:22 1997 -:-ot-'' s-L
~~081316A 1656224.8715 864424.3008 80° 09'50.2279 36°07'10.2692 Aug 13 16:04:04 1997 -:i -s~/#,
~081316B 1656556. 7451 864952.1662 80° 09'46.2586 36°07'15.5274 Aug 13 16:28:43 1997 _,-c.-~
•
JAME:S 8. HUNT JR .
. . · GoVCRNOR
:i,-. WAYNE MCDE:YITT
. :._<-k
,·
f~j
~--._:._; !· ·~ .. . ·· :A
·) ! i . ·:;
~ ti:::i.cr,Uc±~::J
•
CERTIFIED MAIL
Return Receipt Requested
Ms. Debbie Hastings
Johnson Controls
5757 North Green Bay Avenue
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53209
NORTH.ROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
July 28, l 998
RE: Notice oflnactive Hazardous Substance or
Waste Disposal Site
Johnson Controls/Globe Battery Site
Winston-Salem, Forsyth Co. North Carolina
NCD 000 770 487
Dear Ms. Hastings:
After reviewing the file for this site, it appears that a site notification form
has not been submitted as required. In accordance with N.C.G.S. 130A-310.l(b),
Johnson Controls must complete the enclosed site notification form and submit the completed form, including all sampling results, within thirty days ofreceipt of this
letter.
282 .
If there are any further questions, please call me at [phone], ext.
Sincerely,
&!::·~~
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
Superfund Section
Enclosure
cc: Rich Newberry (w/o enclosure)
401 OBERLIN ROAD, SUITE 150, RALEIGH, NC 27605
PHONE 919·733-4996 FAX [phone] AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER· SO% RECYCLED/I 0% POST•CONSUMER PAPER
• •
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
4SES-ASB
Douglas Moore
Nc·superfund Section
401 Overland Road
Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27605
Dear Mr. Moore:
REGION4
Science and Ecosystem Support Division
980 College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30605-2720
MAY 1 B 1998 RECF"tED
MAY 2 6 1998
SUPEAFUr.L, -,EL,
Our laboratory provided analyses for metals on the Johnsons
Controls Globe site located in Winston Salem, North Carolina.
For these analyses and all analyses that are performed by this
lab, we follow internal quality control protocols to ensure that
the results we report are of high quality.
Some of the specific controls we employ are as follows:
1. Sample preparation includes reagent blanks to check for
contamination and reagent spikes to make sure the
preparation procedure is working properly. In addition, 10
percent of the samples in a project (by matrix) are analyzed
in duplicate and spiked.
2. Metals are always reported above the method detection limit
and below the highest standard in the calibration curve.
For example, if a sample contains the element in
concentrations above the highest standard, the sample is
diluted appropriately and analyzed again.
3. Our calibration curves are checked with standard reference
materials (SRM) obtained from an outside source. The
recovery of the SRM must be within 10 percent of the
certified or accepted value. After the initial calibration
check, the curve is continuously checked throughout the
analytical run with either an SRM or a calibration standard.
These continuing checks occur after about every ten samples.
Analytical runs typically end with a calibration check so
that samples are bracketed b~ these checks.
•
4.
• •
2
Precision and accuracy for duplication and recovery are
compared to historical data (control limits). If sample
results fall outside the acceptable control limits, the
sample is analyzed again. If the sample fails again, the
results are flagged appropriately for the situation.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to call
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jenny Scifres, Chief
Inorganic Chemistry Section
MEMORANDUM
•
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SCIENCE AND ECOSYSTEM SUPPORT DIVISION
OFFICE OF QUALITY ASSURANCE
REGION IV
980 COLLEGE STATION RD.
ATHENS, GA 30605-2720
DATE: May 7, 1998
SUBJECT: Chain of Custody for Johnson Control Globe Project
FROM: Keith Bates, Environmental Scientist
Office of Quality Assurance
TO: Doug Moore
State of North Carolina Superfund Program
Enclosed is the chain of custody (COC) for the Johnson Control Globe Project. This COC was
generated to send samples analyzed by the contract laboratory to the EPA laboratory.
If you have any questions, please call me at 706/355-8556
Antech Ltd.
Chain of Custody Record
Relinquished By: (Signature and Printed Name) ,..-
(Signature and _Printed Name)
Date 16k..1b,
oa{e
Time
Time
-Antcch Quote ID No.:
Antcch Contac1 Name:
Client Purchase Order No.:
Method of Shipment:
ShipmCnt ID: "
fl..n [<.Ji SamplelD Sample De,,cription
Number Date FfA Description 1-----.-----..,:==-"='~=;:_---------l~ l :; ,.,, Time
'1 70"6-t/,D'\ 10/ ~ 'i 15 .. "\5
I li>ID I I
I ID II I f
I lJ> I.._ I I I
11"13 I I
't,1 '1 I I I
( l,1<; I I
11..1 b I l
I(,, 11 I I
I lo I~ J. ti>
For Labo-~atory u;e:Qnly: ·
M (Jrt.. f 1. ">
l"!JOl°lf 70
M'l!)M-117 I
/'1.IP/11 f7 :l.
lf'l1>Ml"75.
ti I:> P't 111 '7 '1
IL. l()fl1 I" 7 ')
l"ltit'I r" i{.
l"t 1?"'11' 71
1'1 IO"" d ")is
v
V'
J
J
V
v
V
JL.4/4. '
Ship To:
Antech Ltd.
9'is'-0053
One Triangle Drive
Export. PA 15632
(4!2) 733-1161
FAX [phone]
_Sampler: ----=-=--------(Printed Na.me)
Sample Return/Disposal:
~ Return to Client
0 Disposal by Antech
.~
'1-
1(
1(
'I.
'I.
'{
.,
"' 'l.
'L
Results To:
,!' Client Name:
Company:
Address:
Invoice To:
-r
'
--.
SumptCCcillditi0n ~pon ReC'i:~}P,_,:_ ------'---';,-------'---------="~--~~~· ~-_,_-~-,-·~---_' ·_· ._-':,~,--"'~--~~ Client Name: t· ..
Company:
Address:
Was Temperature \lial Sen1-With Cooler? _NQ, ___ _ ..
•· ••••••·'"'"'°'c·-
P Of /. age· _ __,__ --1-.--
For Laboi-atOry Use· ORiy -\..ab<.m1t1ny_ Project Nn,-: /
--
..... _
(Signature)
Date Time
10/30/9? IO D 0
Date Time
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
l
I
l
MAC.Amech-Admin.Antech-Chain of Custody
Rev.: 08/0 I /97
•
Memorandum
Date: March 9, 1998
To:
From:
Subj.:
File
Douglas Moore
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
ES! survey trip report
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Kernersville, Forsyth County, NC
US EPA ID: NCD 000 770 487
•
On Wednesday, March 5, 1998, Douglas Moore and Rusty Harris-Bishop of the NC Superfund
Section travelled to the Johnson Controls site near Kernersville to resurvey 12 sample points from
the August 1997 Expanded Site Inspection sample trip. The trip was necessary in order to get
accurate locations for the sample points so they could be plotted on a site base map. The original
11 sample points were found to exhibit inaccuracies to an extent that made them unacceptable for
plotting on the base map. It was previously determined that a software setting on the Global
Positioning System (GPS) defaulted to a 2D satellite reading, instead of the 3D satellite reading that
would produce the type of accuracy that was needed to plot the points on the base map. An GPS
survey file was also collected at a wooden stake that denotes the beginning of a downstream wetland
on the unnamed tributary below pond #I.
Before leaving the office, Harry Zinn of the NC Superfund Section reset the GPS software to
"Manual 3D" setting, guaranteeing that only a 3D satellite reading would be collected by the GPS
during surveys. The point dilution of precision mask(or "PDOP"), a measure of instrument
precision, was set at the manufacturers recommended default setting of 6. The instrument would
thereafter collected waypoint readings from at least 4 satellites that exhibited a PDOP of 6 or less.
For the readers information, a PDOP of 4 or below is likely to yield highly accurate positions,
between 5 and 8 is acceptable, and 8 or more is poor. The instrument clock was rechecked to verify
the times between the base and rover. No variations were noted between the two. In addition, the
GPS battery was replaced and a backup battery was recharged prior to leaving the office.
In addition, Harry Zinn field verified the GPS accuracy by collecting a series of waypoint readings
at a known location within the Raleigh area, conducted data averaging and differential correction to
a fixed base station located in Raleigh and determined that the reading was within several inches of
its benchmark survey point coordinates. On Tuesday, March 4, 1998, Douglas Moore and Harry
Zinn used the GEO-PC software to predict the best times for collecting 3D readings, based on the
largest number of satellites in the sky at the site latitude and longitude during March 5, 1998. The
best times were predicted to occur in the morning between I 0-11 am and afternoon between 2:30 -
• •
5:30 pm.
We arrived at the Johnson Controls site at I 0: IO am and met with plant engineer Cecil Boyd. Mr.
Boyd accompanied us while we conducted our surveys. At I 0:40 am, we walked to pond #2 and
collected OPS file C0304 l 5A at the head of pond #2, about 4 feet below a drain pipe outlet. The
survey point corresponds to ES! sample point JC-013-SL. Photo I shows Rusty Harris-Bishop
collecting the OPS survey point, relative to the drain pipe.
At I 0:50 am, we walked along the unnamed tributary below pond #2 and collected OPS file
C0304 I 5C at the sample point for JC-002-SD. The sample point was previously marked by a red
flag with the time, date and sample ID number written on the flag. The sample point is located about
I 00 feet downgradient of the drain outlet pipe of pond #2. Photo 2 shows Rusty Harris-Bishop
collecting the OPS survey point, relative to the drain pipe outlet of pond #2. The POOP for the 3D
file read 4.51.
From I 0:50-11 :50 am, we attempted to located the background sample point JC-00 I-SL. Since the
sample point was not marked by any red flags and Rusty Harris-Bishop was unable to locate the
exact sample point, we discussed the problem with Cecil Boyd, who agreed to let us come back
again and resurvey the sample point, if we need to in the future.
At 11 :56 am, we located the downgradient sample point JC-003-SD on the unnamed tributary below
pond #3. The sample point was located in the bend of the tributary about 200 feet downgradient of
the drain pipe outlet of pond #3. The sample point corresponds to OPS file C030417A. Photo 3
shows Rusty Harris-Bishop collected the OPS file at the sediment sample point JC-003-SD below
pond 3.
From 12:20-13:20, we departed the Johnson Controls site and broke for lunch. Cecil Boyd decided
not to accompany us on our afternoon surveys.
At 13 :30 pm, we arrived at the Otis Crews residence, 2771 West Mountain Road and received verbal
permission to collect the OPS survey sample points.
At 13 :48 pm, we located the wooden stake that denotes the head of the wetland on the Otis Crews
property. The wetland was previously identified by John Thomas, US Army Corps of Engineers,
and the stake was placed by the Superfund Section personnel at the location where Mr. Thomas
designated as the beginning of the wetland. The stake location corresponds to OPS file C030418A.
Photo 4 shows Rusty Harris-Bishop collecting the OPS survey point relative to the stake location.
The POOP for the 3D file read 4.51.
At 13:57 pm, we located the downstream surface water and sediment sample point JC-006-SW/SD.
The sample point was identified by Douglas Moore and confirmed by referencing the original
sample photographs showing a distinctive landmark tree. The sample point corresponds to OPS file
C030418B. Photo 5 shows Rusty Harris-Bishop collecting the OPS survey point relative to the
2
• •
landmark tree. The POOP for the 30 file read 4.75.
At 14:08 pm, we located the downstream surface water and sediment sample point JC-012-SW/SDon
Lowery Mill Creek. The sample point was identified by Douglas Moore and confirmed by the red
flag placed on the bank of the stream denoting the sample ID, date and time. The sample point
corresponds to OPS file C030419A. Photo 6 shows Rusty Harris-Bishop collecting the OPS survey
point for JC-012-SW relative to the red flag and Lowery Mill Creek. The POOP for the 30 file read
3.39.
At 14:33 pm, we located the downstream surface water sample point JC-014-SW on the unnamed
tributary to Lowery Mill Creek. The sample point corresponds to OPS file C0304 l 9B. The sample
point was located in a small pool next to a large diameter maple tree. Photo 7 shows Rusty Harris-
Bishop collecting the OPS survey point for JC-014-SW relative to the maple tree. The POOP for
the 30 file read 4.66.
At 14:35 pm, we located the downstream sediment sample point JC-014-SD on the unnamed
tributary to Lowery Mill Creek. The sample point corresponds to OPS file C0304 l 9C. The sample
point was identified by Douglas Moore and confirmed by a red flag placed at the location denoting
the sample ID, date and time. Photo 8 shows Rusty Harris-Bishop collecting the OPS survey point
for JC-014-SD. The POOP for the 30 file read 4.94.
At 15:40 pm, we located the downstream sediment sample JC-016-SD on an unnamed tributary to
Lowery Mill Creek. The sample point corresponds to the OPS file C030420A. The sample point
was identified by Rusty Harris-Bishop and confirmed by a red flag denoting the sample ID, date and
time. Photo 9 shows Rusty Harris-Bishop collecting the OPS survey point for JC-016-SD, relative
to the red flag. The POOP for the 30 file read 5.65.
At 16:08 pm, we located the downstream surface water and sediment sample JC-015-SW/SD on an
unnamed tributary to Lowery Mill Creek. The sample point was identified by Rusty Harris-Bishop.
The sample point corresponds to OPS file C030421A. Photo 10 shows Rusty Harris-Bishop
collecting the OPS survey point at JC-015-SW/SD. The POOP for the 30 file read 4.60.
At 16:39 pm, we located the downstream surface water and sediment sample point for JC-01 l-
SW/SD on an unnamed tributary to Lowery Mill Creek. The sample point was identified by Rusty
Harris-Bishop and confim1ed by a red flag denoting the sample ID, date and time. Photo 11 shows
Rusty Harris-Bishop collecting the OPS survey point for JC-011-SW/SD relative to the red flag. The
POOP for the 30 file read 4.07.
On Monday, March 9, 1998, Harry Zinn downloaded base station files from the fixed station located
in downtown Raleigh. Harry Zinn then combined them into a base file to use for differential
correction. The rover files were then downloaded onto the GEO-PC software program, and the 150
plus waypoints were averaged to improve the precision, then differentially corrected against the base
3
• •
station files for accuracy. The results were printed in two formats: the State of North Carolina NAD-
83 State Plane Coordinate System, and the WGS-84 Worldwide Geodetic System Geographic
Coordinate System. A copy of the differentially corrected OPS coordinates for each sample point
is attached to this memo.
4
• •
1,1656695.3221, 864283.8304,"Mar 04 15:41:58 1998" -CO Sot-/5,4-[r,-o,"3 .,;.__] /
2, 1656450.2911, 864452.3388,"Mar 04 15:53:59 1998" -CO?,o/1-t SC. [.n:-ooz · spJ/
3,1656567.4147, 864888.5259,"Mar 04 17:04:04 1998"-lO?>o'rl7A {3,:,003,sl>] ✓
4, 1655293.7860, 863827.1003,"Mar 04 18:50: 13 1998" -co,o'f-lB'k [H...4 oP. w,,,t-1,,,,..;..,~ vr] ✓
5, I 654975.6280, 863961.6933,"Mar 04 18:59: 15 1998" -<..o?>ot/-1 lf'B L-Jl.-oo, -!ft,J/,i:.J
6,1654580.0478, 863786.0816,"Mar 04 19:12:41 1998"-cc,~lf-,qA-[:J'L·01~-swlr'.9 v-
7,1653994.9992, 863163.8734,"Mar 04 19:34:24 1998" -co'30't 1'1 8 [~-o,4--!:'w~
8,1653961.2963, 863176.4886,"Mar0419:38:041998" -co3o'tiqc Cu..otl/---Q>J ✓
9,1653390.1748, 863069. 7878,"Mar 04 20:37:25 1998" -e.o'3o4 u,,4-[:rc-o,, • S'I>] ti'
I 0, 1653455.1842, 863285.7894,"Mar 04 21: I 0:31 1998" -cc,?£,4.:,/ A [TL-O ,.;-,s.....tQiJ
I 1,1654933.6134, 865197.8037,"Mar 04 21 :41 :42 1998" -lO?o't;i I B [Tc-oll • !iw /sb] v-
l,-80'09'44.4742",36'07'08.9347","Mar 04 15:41:581998"
2,-80°09'47.4846",36°07'10.5726","Mar 04 15:53:59 1998"
3,-80'09'46.1194",36'07'14.8993","Mar0417:04:04 1998"
4,-80' I 0'01.4901 ",36'07'04.2558","Mar 04 18:50: 13 1998"
5,-80° I 0'05.3869",36'07'05.5497","Mar 04 18:59: 15 1998"
6,-80° 1 0'I 0.1827",36'07'03.7672" ,"Mar 04 19: 12:41 1998"
7,-80° 10'17.2234",36'06'57.5464","Mar 04 19:34:24 1998"
8,-80' 10'17.6360",36°06'57.6672","Mar 04 19:38:04 I 998"
9,-80° I 0'24.5809",36°06'56.5454","Mar 04 20:37:25 1998"
I 0,-80° I 0'23.8197",36'06'58.6889","Mar 04 21: 10:31 1998"
11,-80' 10'06.0762",36°07'17.7679" ,"Mar 04 21 :41 :42 I 998"
,,___
-:---
JOf!f-)Sc•IJ Co1Jrt-0L-'i
f<_ i; f.N 13"/,S U I l I,..{,; ( f::.ofc '>''f n-f <!.eJ , 0J C
US €PA-(b: Nci> ooc! 770 4·<7
Pv Rfo'ie : To RF-Su(211E1 SA·Mf-l'-'-" f?oJNr.5
'11f1,--T vv c/<.c CO LLEc.rtJh o,v /lvG-l1-I-S 1 tC/q 7 /?SI
!
0 E -rtl?-M I ,vFb 7b f:,c. J /\JI, G. c..u /2-/r:r€ lv 1+-i;;;J
· Th,\-a,.s·. Dou;;-Moo{!.A:
(2 u ""f l--/Nu'tt , -(';, I s /1'0 p
, A-RJI. I V i:c" .1\--r s· i rG ~
; I~ -cv"liLsc/ ·-tv f""") 4 2--arJ coit.,_c/,"1 bPc; AL,
_[c.osof.f-l'JA] tt,'f' iv.JI ol p~A 2 1 tc./.z,,....t l./ ('p,J h<./ow
idv·,u'<A ri'r-c OLJ./Lc/-. fl,..,,-/,, <;;/r.ow-,l' /2.vshr 1-\c.,ris-B,ikp
co/lxcA-11,,<1· G('<; ro~,h-(M.l"-h'.-.! .f<, c{.-,,.,iv<, r'rc.. '»fl-rr
ICO( n:.,, f ,,__cf,,, t>, 'JC -0 ( ~ -S L.
~-o -v,m {k,.j /.,..(~ f o-,,..) il"Z-,~-,/ ( c, re~/-.,,./ fv-. r,,v.-, SC<.• fl<..
pf-_j-c -00'2--~D , ">"---r(., . r~ 1v-.n v /L,..,j_ fo.t. 1-<J. ff..,,) o-,,_
WMf 1-,~1 t1:l~ /00 k<-f; <fo-,.,.,""'jrz...,,kd ,,.f oJ/-k.l--f' f-<' .
o( -fQV-d-2,-_, Rvl'/1 (k,r,5-_8,~l"'f c..l~e,l-c..J Gf<; fi'k
Ctc3o4-t0C] , f1v:,1t, 2 ,4ow, Ru•½ (J,,,.rr,'e;-(s,,t..,-p
u, li.t.e-h'kJ GPs r1s fh£\,,.1 n:l_,,.h'."-+o Jy-qi~ p;f,. 1-JH,.r
'b1ov ,~ 7.... f'roP' Lf-.5' I.
,···, .. . ,'
I
I
_i
I, j.
;J;;;;;{
: I LI
I . i
1,1
_;_/
I
i'' . '
\'llij:
•
SL~ ~0Qd ... · iJ 71L,Yh
-r-NO?/J eJ I 913 1-17os.0JJ 71,lf-'::>cl.? --;;;;;~,,:iaj--~"J~ Y''
-L;r;~· --:~---t:~-•'u c½s,LeJ ;; f/,:'ff" ½$'1i ·-s~--.s· ~"kl _i,
◊i ;,.:.,., 5:';J(}O-"JS; .:p '-71~ li.;-o ll,_;:;,----..,;;-r.i?Jfs'vtiiioy :p · fMfiil? · [,5i:SI
15 •,Jr : d ao J · -~ · f 01 JJj · ½-:--· ,..,. 'f"' J 'H "'tJ_ '{··::>o) : JtOl,1
I" Ji/ ~-P->iJ..,l'es )Ir'!' i(i--7,,.i -~\IV" Cc;,,·_,pi:>i'lJ
rt~ -11, [4' 01-h c,'i:O fl "I Y
· h./ .s O d ' p -v I -I"-"" f.r f""" "1
( . ·,LC . "I,. I
i <;JCJ
. . /4. 7'~11 .s d 3 1"' "11 "7 4f ""' ' ss. ' v'lA wd f" '1 "?JI .
5J9 /'-'r "))'-' ),11,_1'?)-~ IM 'fl
t' ;,,q-s r.2-/010 1 -J-h.s/
f'i,,,,.,..., b O '1"-'l ! ""~) · UV\!//\
i
' I.
i I
I
I
/L ' ,, I
j
I.
c_LJ-'O -f" r,_,.. un, -17<;_ ·,1:.1
'£ p~ /"J./Jrc;
<ZS -roo -?L ·.;cl "),/~:,:; -/~.'}9.?S -I'}> [ttL/-hosou
?J..'!' 5,/6) r--'/'C>'?J".} '£. l""'°J y,, :l"}f"'0 '1/ ,.,,lf'::>/a-t
..; I >'JJ--.bs --r"":'l"'-r I-:, 7J. ::J· SJ9 -1"1,/0;; '/ 4.,wJ--i;,-/1,~
.) , 'ISi$} -s, u1'1/i ~s nr:J :r,,v:n1, ~ "-j('11d '£. /-"""--{) J e, -1 ·?J-1 '° o .,...;, .1 "'. ,~.,,,, ~;--x; -P v oqz ~J IJ ,
'q,-,oo-_7[c -11 r;/~,17_,;, -1'',.,.:/'""-'bvMo_p ('"'jl:?Jo/ -,_c---;;
· -f / 'J J..~s /4/ y~ ! 1~ <tJ :>-1 "-J ':) ntj "1 1 ff' '1,/ Ir'
=!-'"cl -l"'"'YS /,..,ur '1/-/7'/7 ,P f-= 17Any /'°'iJ.J
'1-/J,--, f':>55 r.> J.~'<( '-I> j-5 ./7 V)W ;;1.j"':JO/ 'lJ '7JYl1r> $-?M
d.s,1 ,"tj-.5U'C/-J L;Jny /J""' J.,v}d l,...,v /,../ f'l?J.A,,,_,..!
_-f'" ,,, ""' -N1 "",L/":>Jn/ "JJ....,5 hr.!._ ·7.5 -/o()-J[' vv,,'}"'7•/ -")j""'S ;,as flY,00,6,p,:,c; 1J'"°} ';· f'YJ.'&JJ.? -o5: I/ -o';-,O/
.. ..... r .. ........ . -. ·•.. .-· ..... _
----
I -,
I
' !-
' i-·
,.,....
!
1-.
,.
' '
i-
, ______ _
:·---
-..:.:..,i __ _
19-o't' -lo, , .. 1-c,) c/oUJns·lrca,,,.._ ~"-'" I'(; pl-(fc~CJ/] -Si.,-i /SD
i o-i,,. Lo..,,J · M, U\ Urc.e~ . <;;,,~ f . iJ.e,.,.Jio-rci ~ /IGJ
: pif./.1 = l;iC<,,.vlc. P/..uh C -s~ R»~ l<bru ,-B,4.er
co!Le ... 1,;'<') {,PS \AJC/ roi,J• af-Tc>o1 J -S0J/sb S<"-f~ ff.
Scwr& ft COrYr.<Jfuv-.(:UJ fv bl'$ f;k . [co ":,o 41 q 4-J ,
~P: ~-39.
i!::_~3 -locc,,kJ -,u,(<,.u ,..,,J-'-\ 5'<...('L p+ JC.-0/4--Siv
{)½ U<"-"-"-o--ed. r .,.,• i Uh, k 7 1-o Lo \,.JJ f-;t, u C,,,.<:.~/,L . S,,._p-l<-
' p-4-. lo CttM "'J( "J fu {a,~ ,....,,k iree. pw .. 1 '8!ww3
(1,v,~ l6rn·$ · r.,,.,l,,cr c;.e,lL<'c,btuJ &f'S WCl,("';"j--.,.,r J(·O/'t· S0
';)(,~ r* ~ r <Y-rc¼f~ I,, Gps ,{ik. [Co3o'-f-l~ 13].
ftio r ·. Lr G. lo .
: r ".L?5 ~ ( v ,c:cU '>" di ~--t s· '"' f c, pf 'JC-o I 4-~ fl ""' u T fu
: le,v..:a1 M-1 it Cr CL/, . ~f"G' f . /d.v,..fi f,e J ~ '1'.t' ·H« j
i P/U}ti) f' sl,01,vs (J,.,.,1 /-1a rri> -P:i1~ ee;{Le.di"'7 6('; v--'<f.tf'''.,J-
u:;( JC✓ o I 4--.>!> . Sa"rt,-r C(Jr ~1' cv-/.,,; -tn 6 f's (, Le. [6, 3clt I q c. J
f j:,ot ' 4-,Ci. 4-
: /~40 r bJccd-ccP ~~ s:a,,-"°l,_ pf. 'J(-O{i -SD ""'-u.,.,_,..--,,/4..
I .
! {VI\,, l'v:;r ,i..,, Lcn.v=; /..Jt,,/,{ C!"'CR[',' ~,{, ~ "--rl<. pf-i J..,,.,J,r:,·.,J_
l--<1 ,r%\ fla.o ' Piu,.tu q c:;;,4,, W.J" /4,f-½ IA,n,'r-61 "'-,f c.ollcch~
{:,fs· vv"-1 f vl,;J' ,,,/-T{ -D10 • ~r., r:":_(J,~ __ ./.-, i:,:.J .{Jt~ ~fl,_
p+--CL>rre.,,p,z~ ./u t:Ps (J~ a:ccx'4'::l:_OA-], . fDof ~ ~.GS
~,\;-~:~> ·~~-
.· '..,,·.=
i i
./
. ' ' ., I
i
' I
' I l
!
'
:~_er -[,,oiiz::J s,t~r,Lc rl ~ G[-Oi '5--;·1r1/sD <>-v-Uv1>1,1,--,,J
I :f v1Gv[-t,"'l hJ lov~ /'v1i[{ C,rce,f. P~Llfu Iv 5Ljc-i,JJ r?0 ~
, lt,, (I'.'> -()714tt' co li.Lch"'i &P5 rtr.Jt0-1., {w 1C-0/-5-5w/c;D .
I /?/..,~, [.)t< rr I,-f), 't ior c~ Iv cf-eel GP5 {j l,?. [co '?V 't-?-1 A-:1 cf
-SID\A-cfG-fr SC0/6 ·5,1,u/jp. TJpoP · 4-. bCJ
: ~}'1 -lorako! s«~pL, f} {r 1C-ojj-SvJ/,J; 0"-Unvt"-""'-'-J....
-r;,-ii.:,~bc<,·7 ,Ji, Lew"'1 /--'l.1fl (~L<.. ~h I l ~<; f2u,4t t+n,r1s ,P:,,",_;_iuf
, c_,tl,.c..J-i..'4. &fS 1-,,<1-<l.J "')? ftt .:r c.-o I l ~fw /sJ> .._J ia ct-•J-h re,}_
. f-<"'J cxd J, i'cu.Ji;7. ~ 'iw-vf pt . "'°'f1.,_ pl-GI>, re.p,.-,..J..-,
, ,-n, 6PS Pile le o 'xi4-J. 1 Bl . Pool' 4-07
(
_)
-.
i
~~-:;.:w..,~~ f--
~
~~-f,,>'·
~2~' -•·-. ~~ . ~ •. '--,: ,r.. ·• ..• --·
,.,
t;.,;,,.,;,;-,-if',,..
• NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
February 5, 1998
Mr. Otis Crews
2771 West Mountain Road
Kernersville, NC 27284
Subj.: Well Sampling Results
.Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division,
Kernersville, Forsyth County, NC
USEPA JD# NCD000770487
Dear Mr. Crews:
As you are aware, the NC Superfund Section collected samples from your drinking water well on August 13, 1997 as part of an environmental assessment of the site. Samples were analyzed by laboratories participating in the EPA's contract laboratory program for the chemicals listed on the attached sheets. The contaminants listed below were detected in your well water sample. Concentrations are listed in parts per billion (PPB).
Contaminant
Barium
Zinc
Calcium
Magnesium
Potassium
Concentration
(PPB)
8.0
26.0
11,000.0
4,700.0
1,300.0
NC Groundwater
Standard (PPB)
2,000.0
2,100.0
none issued
none issued
none issued
** EPA Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels
MCL (PPB)
2,000.0
5,000.0**
none issued
none issued
none issued
These contaminants were measured at concentrations which are below applicable NC Groundwater Standards and below Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) considered acceptable for lllihli£ water supplies. These results were reviewed by the State Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section and they have concluded that your water is safe for continued normal usage. A copy of their evaluation is attached for your information.
If you have any questions regarding health concerns, please contact Dr. Ken Rudo, Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section at [phone].
401 OBERLIN ROAD, SUITE 150, RALEIGH, NC 27605 PHONE [phone] FAX 919·715-3605 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/I 0% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
• • NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Letter to Mr. Crews
February 5, 1998
Page 2
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
If you have any other questions, please contact Douglas Moore, Superfund Section
at [phone], ext. 315.
attachments
cc: Dr. Ken Rudo, letter only
File
Donna Keith
Douglas Moore
/
Sincerely,
Pat DeRosa, Head
Site Evaluation and Removal Branch
Superfund Section
401 01:JERLIN ROAD, SUITE 150, RALEIGH, NC 2.7605
PHONE [phone] FAX 919·715-3605
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
• •
FEB O 4 1998
North Carolina SUPERFUND SECT\ON
Department of Health and Human Services
Division of Epidemiology
P.O. Box 2960 I • Raleigh, NC 27626-060 I
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor H. Davi_d Bruton, M.D., Secretary
DATE. __ ..,_lf,_1-_3-+/~1_t ___ _
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Kenneth Rudo, Ph.D., Toxicologist
Medical Evaluation and Risk Assessment Branch
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section
l{v, )4 ~.J ~ iv,\lo,i ~
t,'.J 7r~ t~v, ½
Attached is the Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section's drinking water health-risk evaluation for the· well water sample from the above site. Recommendations for continued water use are also provided.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
KR/rm
North Carolina: Host a/the /999 Special O(vmpics World Summer Games
•
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY SECTION
DRINKING WATER HEALTH RISK EVALUATION
GENERAL
DATE ---4S)__::'L::..,.1/-'-'ff_
/
COUNTY~-;k--LA BORA TORY # / '--'-/.t'), flr,e!-YJY
I
( )
( )
( )
( )
Based on these analytical results. this water should be considered safe for normal usage.
Chemical analysis did not show any contamination. Water should be resampled if odor or taste persists.
The water should not be used for drinking or cooking purposes; avoid prolonged bathing/showering.
Based on these anai)1ical results, this water is highly contaminated and should not be used for drinking, cooking , or bathing/showering.
The laboratory results are not conclusive, please resample.
PLEASE INDICATE ON LAB SHEET THAT IT IS A RESAMPLE AND PROVIDE PREVIOUS
SAMPLE NUMBER(S).
COMMENTS:
/
For further information. contact Dr. Ken Rudo, Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section,
[phone].
DEl-!NR 3891 (5/96)
Occupational and EnYironmemal Epidemiolog:• Section (Re\'ie,,· 5199)
• •
PURPOSE: To convey meaningful health-based recommendations about continued use of
drinking water which may contain chemical contaminants.
PREPARATI6N:
·(I) Public peal th toxicologist prepares original.
(2) Tbree (3) copies are made and sent to Division of Environmental Health for distribution
(I copy for Division of Environmental Health, I copy for local health department, and I
copy for well owner(s)).
DISPOSITION:
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section: This form will be kept within the
Section for five (5) years and transferred to Records Services for five (5) years, then .
destroyed.
Recipient Agencies: This form will be used as guidance for the specific well sample(s) indicated,
retained until need ends. then destroyed.
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample \'[2;iSBiJ FY 1997
VOLATILES SCAN
Project: 97-0328
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC
Program: NSF Case Number: 25633
Id/Station: JC002PW MD Number: MP69
Media: GROUNDWA D Number: MP69
RESULTS UNITS ANAL YTE
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU
• 10U
10U
10U
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
ACETONE
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U ·,ou
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
•
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,2-DtCHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRtCHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3-DtCHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ET_l;IYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
,;-average value. NA-not ana_tyzed. NAl-interterences. J-estlmated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Production Date: 10/15/97 08:25
Produced by: John Mcconney
Requestor: PAT DEROSA
Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 21 :00
Ending:
K-actual value" is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-malerial was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. H-qc indicates that cta"ta unuSabJe. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. C-Conf1rmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Da\e: 10/15/97 09:00 ,.,~:-.'t Sample i!'2.J58" FY 1997 Project: 97-0328
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC Program: NSF
Id/Station: JC002PW
Media: GROUNDWA
RESULTS
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
•10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
1 0UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
25UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
1 0UJ
10UJ
10UJ
25UJ
A)UJ
a'SUJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
I0UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Case Number: 25633
MD Number: MP69
D Number: MP69
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
HEXACHLOROETHANE
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER N-NJTROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
NITROBENZENE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILJNE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
ISOPHORONE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILJNE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
3-NITROANIL/NE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE
FLUORENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
iC'LDING TIMES EXCEEDED(40 CFR 136,OCTOBER 26,1984)
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU
RESULTS
1 0UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
25UJ
10UJ
25UJ
25UJ
25UJ
25UJ
. 10UJ
•average valuf:'. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: John Mcconney
Requester: PAT DEROSA
Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 21 :00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALA TE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
CARBAZOLE
-:,c!ual value is known to be less than value given. L-ac!ua! value is known to be greater than value given. U-materia/ was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
-ql'. indic:itcs that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. ,-.-:-nfirmed by gems: 1-when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample ~45°8i FY 1997 · Project: 97-0328
METALS SCAN
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC Program: NSF
ld/St2,ion: JC002PW ,
Media: GROUNDWA
Case Number: 25633
MD Number: MP69
D Number: MP69
RESULTS
2U
7U
....AR!<J 'll7(1'
1U . ~~
20U
1U
2U
SU
SU
6U
1J
i/i'?.61,
0.20U
40U
1U
tJ!l.9_00!
\lfO~~ -sou
4900J
l,f§.0011
•
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
SILVER
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
TOTAL MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU
\-average value NA-not analyzed. NAJ-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Keith Bates
Requestor: PAT DEROSA.
Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 21:00
Ending:
Production Date: 11/14/97 07:34
K-actual value is known to Pe less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. C-tonfirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
! ·-.
1 ;
j' ,,.· : ; "
,_.,:
3·
-~ '' • p
. ' ~
• NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
February 5, 1998
Mr. Henry Moore
2635 West Mountain Road
Kernersville, NC 27284
Subj.: Well Sampling Results
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division,
Kernersville, Forsyth County, NC
USEP A ID# NCD000770487
Dear Mr. Moore:
As you are aware, the NC Superfund Section collected samples from your drinking water well on August 13, 1997 as part of an environmental assessment of the site. Samples were analyzed by laboratories participating in the EPA's contract laboratory program for the chemicals listed on the attached sheets. The contaminants listed below were detected in your well water sample. Concentrations are listed in parts per billion (PPB).
Concentration NC Groundwater
Contaminant (PPB) Standard (PPB)
Barium 31.0 2,000.0
Copper 490.0 1,000.0
Lead 11.0 15.0
Zinc 100.0 2,100.0
Calcium 2,300.0 none issued
Magnesium 1,300.0 none issued
Potassium 890.0 none issued
EPA action level *
•• EPA Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels
MCL (PPB}
2,000.0
1,300.0*
15.0*
5,000.0**
none issued
none issued
none issued
These contaminants were measured at concentrations which are below applicable NC Groundwater Standards and below Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) considered acceptable for public water supplies. These results were reviewed by the State Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section and they have concluded that your water is safe for continued normal usage. A copy of their evaluation is attached for your information.
lfyou have any questions regarding health concerns, please contact Dr. Ken Rudo, Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section at [phone].
401 OBERLIN ROAO, SUITE I SO, RALEIGH, NC 27605
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] AN EQUAL OP~ORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTJON EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLE0/10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
~--~ i"';;,-,9""
~~~
ii [.,
!'.'-
-..... -~.Pi ,;;;:;;~ ~ ......... ~ . ,. ~.,
·;
• • NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Letter to Mr. Moore
February 5, 1998
Page 2
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
lfyou have any other questions, please contact Douglas Moore, Superfund Section
at [phone], ext. 315.
attachments
cc: Dr. Ken Rudo, letter only
File
Donna Keith
Douglas Moore
Sincere!
Pat DeRosa, Head
Site Evaluation and Removal Branch
Superfund Section
401 OBERLIN ROAD, SUITE ISO, RALEIGH, NC 2760S
PHONE [phone] FAX 919•71 S-360S AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER. so% RECYCLED/1 0% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
• • RE ----.E., ,~,~ -· I ·.· ··-. : V .1 .. ,
FEB O 4 1998
North Carolina SUPERFUND SECiiON Department of Health and Human Services
Division of Epidemiology
P.O. Box 2960 I • Raleigh, NC 27626-060 I
James 8. Hunt Jr., Governor H. David Bruton, M.D., Secretary
DATE_~/4-/~_---+>/_1f ___ _
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
vC\tDlfloy, )file i~c-.LrJ·d-1 ct,-'1![ 0,,;M.,,, .. I By.<.,cL Nu.~
J,~i:."1 1d;o, . .
Kenneth Rudo, Ph.D., Toxicologist
Medical Evaluation and Risk Assessment Branch
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section
Attached is the Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section's drinking water health-risk evaluation for the well water sample from the above site. Recommendations for continued water use are also provided.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
KR/rm
North Carolina: Host of the /999 Special Olympics World Summer Games
• •
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEAL TH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY SECTION
l DRINKING WATER HEALTH RISK EVALUATION.
GENERAL
DA TE -if~w_,_>/-'-'-ir_
✓
COUNTY LA BORA TORY # v,/li!)_J(.ff}' Ii'., YJP
I
( )
( )
( )
( )
Based on these analytical results. this water should be considered safe for normal usage.
Chemical analysis did not show any contamination. Water should be resampled if odor or taste persists.
The water should not be used f0r drinking or cooking purposes; avoid p_rolonged bathing/showering.
Based on these anal)~ical results, this water is highly contaminated and should not be used for drinking, cooking, or bathing/showering.
The laboratory results are not conclusive, please resample.
PLEASE INDICATE ON LAB SHEET THAT IT IS A RESAMPLE AND PROVIDE PREVIOUS SAMPLE NUMBER(S).
COMMENTS:
For further information. contact Dr. Ken ,Rudo, Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section, [phone].
DEJ-fNR 3891 (5/96)
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology S.:ciion (Re\·iew 5/99 J
• •
PURPOSE: To convey meaningful health-based recommendations about continued use of
drinking water which may contain chemical contaminants.
PREPARATl6N:
· (1) Public health toxicologist prepares original.
(2) Three (3) copies are made and sent to Division of Environmental Health for distribution
(I copy for Division of Environmental Health, 1 copy for local health department, and 1
copy for well owner(s)).
DISPOSITION:
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section: This form will be kept within the
Section for five (5) years and transferred to Records Services for five (5) years, then .
destroyed.
Recipient Agencies: This form will be used as guidance for the specific well sample(s) indicated,
retained until need ends, then destroyed.
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample e~&/FY 1997
VOLATILES SCAN
Project: 97-0328
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC
Program: NSF
Id/Station: JC001 PW
Media: GROUNDWA
Case Number: 25633
MD Number: MP68
D Number: MP68
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU
RES UL TS UNITS ANAL YTE
10U
1ou
10U
1ou
10U
•
10U
10U
10U
10U
1ou
1ou
10U
1ou
,au ,au
1ou
10U
10U
1ou
10U
,ou
10U
JOU
10U
10U
a1ou
,::,1ou
1ou
1ou
1ou
10U
1ou
10U
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROM OF ORM
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETljYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
A-average value. NA-not anp.Jyzed. NAl-inlerferences. J-esf1mated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of.material.
Production Date: 10/15/97 08:25
Produced by: John Mcconney
Requester: PAT DEROSA
Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 20:15
Ending:
'.(-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantilalion limit. R-qc indicates that data unu·sable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. C -Confi1 noed by gems: 1 _when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 10/15/97 09:00
Sample t2li571 FY 1997 Project: 97-0328
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC Program: NSF Case Number: 25633
ld/Station:JC001PW MD Number: MP68
Media: GROUNDWA
RESULTS
10U
10U
10U
JOU aou ,_,,ou
JOU
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
25U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
25U -~ 10U
10U
10U
10U
1DU
10U
10U
iOU
10U
10U
IOU
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
D Number: MP68
ANALYTE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER HEXACHLOROETHANE
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
NITROBENZENE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
ISOPHORONE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
3-NITROANILINE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE
FLUORENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
HEXAtHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU
RESULTS
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
25U
10U
25U
25U
25U
25U
10U
-average value. NA-not analyzed. NA!-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: John Mcconney
Requestor: PAT DEROSA
Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 20: 15
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE .
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL .
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
CARBAZOLE
3Cluaf value is known to be Jess than value given. L-actual value is known to be gre.iter than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quanlitation limit. -ye indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. • ~.-:infirined :iy gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constil uenls or metabolites of technical chlordane
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Sample 'i'f2:i57i FY 1997
METALS SCAN
EPA -.REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Project: 97-0328
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC
Program: NSF
Id/Station: JC001 PW
Media: GROUNDWA
RESULTS
2U
7U
~1~·
1U
1U
2U
• 1U
~.9.0.'
1U
@;;'
5U
5U
6U
1U
1;!90£'
0.20U
50U
BJ
•~.00 (lf'.loo
30U
3000J
®90'
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
SILVER
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
Case Number: 25633
MD Number: MP68
D Number: MP68
TOTAL MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU
,~-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presi.Jmptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Keith Bates
Requestor: PAT DEROSA
· Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 20:15
Ending:
Production Date: 11/14/97 07:34
K-actual value is known to b·e less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unu"'sable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
• • RECEIVEr1
FEBO 4 1998
North Carolina SUPERFUNO SECTION
Department of Health and Human Services
Division of Epidemiology
P.O. Box 2960 I • Raleigh, NC 27626-060 I
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor H. David Bruton, M.D., Secretary
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
~4tDt.«.Y< JSi'k-z~o.L,J·,., a_v,A 0-,""''"''•' B,-,,cL ~
J,~,,J__ 1c_;/;o~ ·
Kenneth Rudo, Ph.D., Toxicologist
Medical Evaluation and Risk Assessment Branch
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section
Attached is the Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section's drinking water health-
risk evaluation for the well water sample from the above site. Recommendations for continued
water use are also provided.
if you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
KR/rm
North Carolina: Host of the 1999 Special Olympics World Summer Games
( )
( )
( )
( )
• •
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF EPIDEMIOLOGY '
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY SECTION
DRINKING WATER HEALTH RISK EVALUATION
.,, GENERAL
LABORATORY#
Based on these analytical results. this water should be considered safe for nonnal usage.
Chemical analysis did not show any contamination. Water should be resampled if odor or taste persists.
The water should not be used for drinking or cooking purposes: avoid prolonged bathing/showering.
Based on these analytical results, this water is highly contaminated and should not be used for drinking.
cooking . or bathing/showering.
The laboratory results are not conclusive, please resample.
PLEASE INDICATE ON LAB SHEET THAT IT IS A RESAMPLE AND PROVIDE PREVIOUS
SAMPLE NUl\lBER(S).
COMMENTS:
For further infonnation. contact Dr. Ken Rudo, Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section,
[phone].
DEHNR 3891 (5/96)
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section (Re\'iew 5199)
•
PURPOSE: To convey meaningful health-based recommendations about continued use of
drinking water which may contain chemical contaminants.
PREPARATION:
·(I) Public )lealth toxicologist prepares original.
(2) Three (3) copies are made and sent to Division of Environmental Health for distribution
(I copy for Division of Environmental Health, I copy for local health department, and I
copy for well O'wner(s)).
DISPOSITION:
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section: This form will be kept within the
Section for five (5) years and transferred to Records Services for five (5) years, then .
destroyed.
Recipient Agencies: This form will be used as guidance for the specific well sample(s) indicated,
retained until need ends, then destroyed.
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 10/15/97 08:25
Sample 12457 FY 1997
VOLATILES SCAN
Project: 97-0328
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC
Program: NSF Case Number: 25633
Id/Station: JC001 PW MD Number: MP68
Media: GROUNDWA D Number: MP68
RESULTS UNITS
· 1ou UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
1 OU UG/L
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
ACETONE
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
1 OU UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
1 OU UG/L
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
Produced by: John Mcconney
Requestor: PAT DEROSA
Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 20: 15
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not an;:tlyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
:"<-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. Li-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum qu'antitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unu~sable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value i·s reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 10/15/97 09:00
Sample 12457 FY 1997 Project: 97-0328
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC
Program: NSF
Id/Station: JC001 PW
Media: GROUNDWA
RESULTS UNITS
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10.U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
25U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
1 OU UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
25U UG/L
10U UG/L
25U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
10U UG/L
ANALYTE
Case Number: 25633
MD Number: MP68
D Number: MP68
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
HEXACHLOROETHANE
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
NITROBENZENE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
ISOPHORONE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
3-NITROANILINE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
FLUORENE
DI ETHYL PHTHALA TE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
D1-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYLBUTYLPHTHALATE
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU
RESULTS
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
25U
10U
25U
25U
25U
25U
10U
Produced by: John Mcconney
Requester: PAT DEROSA
Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 20: 15
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
D1-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
CARBAZOLE
A-average valuG. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
K-.3ctual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-(..;:infirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane ~
•
•
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA· REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 11/14/97 07:34
Sample 12457 FY 1997 Project: 97--0328
METALS SCAN
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC
Program: NSF
Id/Station: JC001 PW
Media: GROUNDWA
RESULTS UNITS
2U UG/L
7U UG/L
31 UG/L
1U UG/L
1U UG/L
2U UG/L
1U UG/L
490 UG/L
1U UG/L
11 UG/L
5U UG/L
5U UG/L
6U UG/L
1U UG/L
100 UG/L
0.20U UG/L sou UG/L
BJ UG/L
2300 UG/L
1300 UG/L
30U UG/L
3000J UG/L
890 UG/L
ANALYTE
SILVER
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
Case Number: 25633
MD Number: MP68
D Number: MP68
TOTAL MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU
Produced by: Keith Bates
Requester: PAT DEROSA
· Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 20:15
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-_interferences. J-estimated value. N-presUmptive evidence of presence of material.
K-actual valu~ is known to De less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unUsable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
(?-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 10/15/97 08:25
Sample 12458 FY 1997 Project: 97-0328
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC
Program: NSF
Id/Station: JC002PW
Media: GROUNDWA
Case Number: 25633
MD Number: MP69
D Number: MP69
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU
RES UL TS UNITS ANAL YTE
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1, 1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
Produced by: John Mcconney
Requester: PAT DEROSA
Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 21 :00
Ending:
K-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
r:"-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unuSable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C_-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 10/15/97 09:00
Sample 12458 FY 1997 Project: 97-0328
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC Program: NSF
Id/Station: JC002PW
Media: GROUNDWA
RESULTS
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
25UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
25UJ
10UJ
25UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Case Number: 25633
MD Number: MP69
D Number: MP69
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-0ICHLOROBENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
HEXACHLOROETHANE
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
NITROBENZENE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1,2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANIL/NE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
ISOPHORONE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-0INITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
3-NITROANIL/NE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
FLUORENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALA TE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
HCLDING TiMES EXCEEOE0(40 CFR 136,0CTOBER 26,1984)
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU
RESULTS
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
25UJ
10UJ
25UJ
25UJ
25UJ
25UJ
10UJ
Produced by: John Mcconney
Requestor: PAT DEROSA
Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 21 :00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
01-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
CARBAZOLE
A-average valu'i. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material. K-cfct~a!_value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. C-Cv'Jnfirmed Cy gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
•
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 11/14/97 07:34
Sample 12458 FY 1997 · Project: 97-0328
METALS SCAN
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC
Program: NSF
Id/Station: JC002PW
Media: GROUNDWA
RESULTS UNITS
2U UG/L
7U UG/L
8 UG/L
1U UG/L
1U UG/L
2U UG/L
1U UG/L
20U UG/L
1U UG/L
2U UG/L
5U UG/L
5U UG/L
6U UG/L
1J UG/L
26 UG/L.
0.20U UG/L
40U UG/L
1U UG/L
11000 UG/L
4700 UG/L
50U UG/L
4900J UG/L
1300 UG/L
ANALYTE
SILVER
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
NICKEL,
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
THALLIUM .
VANADIUM
ZINC
Case Number: 25633
MD Number: MP69
D Number: MP69
TOTAL MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU
Produced by: Keith Bates
Requestor: PAT DEROSA
Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 21:00
Ending:
(\-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAJ-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence c,f presence of material.
.K-actual vallle is knt;iwn to i;,e less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit.
R-qc indicates that·data unusable. compound n:iay or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis Is necessary for verification.
~~confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
e
•
:/:'i
~:--"'··. ME.s.e:•Hu~T·j'
NOR
J:,-:,:-
.-i·
, "
~
• NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
January 22, 1998
Mrs. Debbie Hastings, CHMM
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Automotive Systems Group
5757 North Green Bay Avenue
Post Office Box 591
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201-0591
Subj.: Analytical Results -Expanded Site Inspection
Johnson Controls -Globe Battery Division
2701 Johnson Controls Drive
Kernersville, Forsyth County, NC
US EPA ID: NCD 00 770 487
Dear Mrs. Hastings:
.
As you requested today by phone, attached are copies of the analytical results
from the August 1997 Expanded Site Inspection (ES!) sampling trip at the subject
site. If you have any questions, please contact me at [phone], ext. 315.
cc: File Sincerely,
Douglas Moore
401 OBERLIN ROAD, SUITE 150, RALEIGH, NC 27605
PHONE [phone] FAX 91 ~-715-3605
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/I 0% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
J~HNSON
CONTR~LS
John Walch
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
Superfund Section
North Carolina Department of Environment &
Natural Resources Division of Waste Management
40 I Oberlin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27605
Johnson Controls.
Battery Group
2701 Johnson Controls Drive
P.O. Box 1667
Kernersville, NC 27285
Phone: [phone]
January 12, 1998
JAN 15 1998
RE: Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. Plant, Winston-Salem,
North Carolina, NC000770487
Dear Mr. Walch:
We have received correspondence of December 15, 1997 from Ms. Charlotte Jesneck, which contains an
Order to Submit Notice of, and to Record, an Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site regarding the
facility referenced above. The order requires that Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. respond to you within 30
days whether it intends to comply without the order. This correspondence constitutes Johnson Controls' response to
that requirement.
It is Johnson Controls' intent to comply with the order. However, please note that Johnson Controls has
conducted follow-up sampling at the site and, as a result, disagrees that the site should have been included in the
first instance as an inactive hazardous substance or waste disposal site. Despite its findings, Johnson Controls does
not believe that either its interests or those of the state are served by taking issue with this determination at this time.
Nevertheless, Johnson Controls' agreement to comply with the order should not in any_way be ci;mstrued ~
agreeing with the conclusion that its Winston-Salem facility should have been included on the state site list.
Furthermore, while Johnson Controls will comply with the order as written if necessary, it would rather
conduct a cleanup and remove its Winston-Salem facility from the state disposal site list as soon as possible. If the
site is addressed immediately, the notice and recordation required by the order becomes moot.
We would like to meet with the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and discuss how to
proceed with the wo_rk. We will contact you in the near future.
Very truly yours,
fuL~i.
Rick Newberry 0
Plant Manager
• NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
January 12, 1998
MEMORANDUM
To: Dr. Ken Rudo, Toxicologist
Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section
Through: Jack Butler, Chief ~
Superfund Section P" Ii'---/
From: Pat DeRosa, Site Evaluation and Removal Branch Head~
Superfund Section
Subject: Health Risk Evaluation Request
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Kernersville, Forsyth County, N.C.
Please find enclosed a copy of the laboratory analyses for well samples
collected by the Superfund Section around the subject site. Since these samples were
collected from drinking water wells, the Superfund Section requests a health risk
evaluation and a recommendation on the continued use of these wells. This
information will be provided to the affected well users. If you have any questions
regarding this matter, please contact Doug Moore or me at 733-2801.
attachments
cc: File
Donna Keith
Doug Moore
401 OBERLIN ROAD, SUJTE 1 SO, RALEIGH, NC 27605
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY I AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER· 50% RECYCLED/I 0% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA-REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 12457 FY 1997
VOLATILES SCAN
Project: 97 -0328
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC
Program: NSF Case Number: 25633
Id/Station: JC001 PW MD Number: MP68 lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU Media: GROUNDWA
RESULTS
· 10u
10U
10U
10U •
e
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
D Number: MP68
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
Production Date: 10/15/97 08:25
Produced by: John Mcconney
Requester: PAT DEROSA
Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 20:15
Ending:
A-average value. NA-not an~lyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
,K-actual value is known to b~e less than value given. L-actual value ls known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitalion limit.
,:-Z-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification.
C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Date: 10/15/97 09:00
Sample 12457 FY 1997 Project: 97-0328
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC
Program: NSF Case Number: 25633
Id/Station: JC001 PW MD Number: MP68
Media: GROUNDWA
RESULTS
10U
10U
10U
10U
•
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
25U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
25U A.1ou
IW'2su
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UGIL
D Number: MP68
ANALYTE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
HEXACHLOROETHANE
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
NITROBENZENE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
ISOPHORONE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
3-NITROANILINE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
4-NITROANILINE
FLUORENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU
RESULTS
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
25U
10U
25U
25U
25U
25U
10U
A-average ','alue. NA-not analyzed. NAJ-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: John Mcconney
Requester: PAT DEROSA
Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 20:15
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UGIL
UGIL
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALA TE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
PHENOL
2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2.4-DINITROPHENOL
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
CARBAZOLE
K-3ctual value is known to be less than va!ue given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quanlitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 12457 FY 1997 Project: 97--0328
METALS SCAN
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE-WINSTON-SALEM, NC
Program: NSF
Id/Station: JC001 PW
Media: GROUNDWA
RESULTS
2U
7U
31
1 U
1U
2U
• 1U
490
1U
11
5U
5U
6U
1U
100
0.20U
50U
BJ
2300
1300
30U
3000J
890
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
SILVER
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
Case Number: 25633
MD Number: MP68
D Number: MP68
TOTAL MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU
· A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presl.lmptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Keith Bates
Requester: PAT DEROSA
'Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 20:15
Ending:
Production Date: 11/14/97 07:34
K-actual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. LI-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation Hmit. "R.-qc indicates that data unu~sabte. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
VOLATILES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 12458 FY 1997 Project: 97 -0328
VOLATILES SCAN
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC
Program: NSF
Id/Station: JC002PW
Media: GROUNDWA
RESULTS
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U • 10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Case Number: 25633
MD Number: MP69
D Number: MP69
ANALYTE
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE (1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE (TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
BENZENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE (TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
A-average value. NA-not ana}yzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Production Date: 10/15197 08:25
Produced by: John McConney
Requestor: PAT DEROSA
Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 21 :00
Ending:
i)-actual value is kno"Yn to be less than value given. L-actuat value is known to be greater than value given. U-materla! was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R-qc indicates that data unuSable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. C~confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
EXTRACTABLES SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA Production Da~e: 10/15/97 09:00
Sample 12458 FY 1997 Project: 97-0328
EXTRACTABLES SCAN
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC Program: NSF
Id/Station: JC002PW
Media: GROUNOWA
RESULTS
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
•
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
25UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
25UJ
.-,10UJ
W25UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
Case Number: 25633
MD Number: MP69
D Number: MP69
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER HEXACHLOROETHANE
BIS(2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER N-NITROSOOI-N-PROPYLAMINE
NITROBENZENE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
ISOPHORONE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTAOIENE (HCCP) 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
3-NITROANILINE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 4-NITROANILINE
FLUORENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE(HCB)
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
01-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
HOLDING TIMES EXCEEDED(40 CFR 136,0CTOBER 26,1984)
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Co.ntractor: COMPU
RESULTS
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
10UJ
25UJ
10UJ
25UJ
25UJ
25UJ
25UJ
10UJ
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAJ-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: John Mcconney
Requestor: PAT DEROSA
Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13/97 21:00
Ending:
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
01-N-OCTYLPHTHALA TE BENZO(B ANO/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2-METHYLPHENOL
(3-ANO/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
PHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
CARBAZOLE
K-ctclual value is known to be less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quan!itation limit.
R-qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical r:hlorrl;::in,:,
METALS SAMPLE ANALYSIS EPA -REGION IV SESD, ATHENS, GA
Sample 12458 FY 1997 · Project: 97-0328
METALS SCAN
Facility: JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE WINSTON-SALEM, NC
Program: NSF
Id/Station: JC002PW
Media: GROUNDWA
RESULTS
2U
7U
8
1U
1U
•
2U
1U
20U
1U
2U
SU
SU
6U
1J
26
0.20U
40U
1U
11000
4700 sou
4gQ0J
1300
UNITS
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L.
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
ANALYTE
SILVER
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
COBALT
CHROMIUM
COPPER
NICKEL
LEAD
ANTIMONY
SELENIUM
THALLIUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
Case Number: 25633
MD Number: MP69
D Number: MP69
TOTAL MERCURY
ALUMINUM
MANGANESE
CALCIUM
MAGNESIUM
IRON
SODIUM
POTASSIUM
lnorg Contractor: CHEM
Org Contractor: COMPU
A-average value. NA-not analyzed. NAl-interferences. J-estimated value. N-presumptive evidence of presence of material.
Produced by: Keith Bates
Requester: PAT DEROSA
Project Leader: DEROSA
Beginning: 08/13197 21 :00
Ending:
Production Date: 11/14/97 07:34
.K-actuar value is known to pe less than value given. L-actual value is known to be greater than value given. U-material was analyzed for but not detected. the number is the minimum quantitation limit. R--qc indicates that data unusable. compound may or may not be present. resampling and reanalysis is necessary for verification. C-confirmed by gems: 1.when no value is reported, see chlordane constituents 2.constituents or metabolites of technical chlordane
•
Site Name: Johnson Controls
Site Number: NCO 000 770 487
Site Location: Kernersville, Forsyth County, N.C.
Latitude: 36 07 09.0
Longitude: 080 09 40.0
Date: January 06, 1998
Calculation Results
Distance from
Site Location
Population
Per Ring Cumulative
Oto l/4mile 53 53
> 1/4 to l /2 mile 183 236
>1/2 to I mile 1, I 49 1,385
> 1 to 2 miles 4,710 6,095
>2 to 3 miles 12,045 18,140
>3 to 4 miles 23,547 41,687
••
Number of Households
Per Ring Cumulative
23 23
92 115
491 606
1,834 2,440
4,647 7,087
9,927 17,0)4
Note: The populations and number of households within specified target distance rings were
calculated for the NC Superfund Section by the NC Center for Geographic Information
and Analysis using the 1990 US Census data. These values were calculated by summing
the population and the number of households data for each census block located within
each target ring. For census blocks lying only partially within the ring, the per cent area
of the block within the ring was multiplied by the population and household densities of
the block.
• • •
PAGE 2
State North Carol1na Database 01/15/98 07.51.22 EPA Reg1on IV
V1o1 at 1ons & Enforcement .A.ct ions JOHNSON CONTROLS BATT GRP me .NCD000770487, KERNERSVILLE. cont 1nued -
,JOHNSON CONTROLS BATT GRP !fJC KERNERSVlLLE County: FORSYTH LO. ;:o:ie: NC067 Leg.D\st.
NCD000770487 Universtcs-Subj. to CE!: Subject to CA: LQG: X SOC: Trans: ZIP: 27285
Access. Ind.:----OK----Accepts offsite?: -not specified -Non-notif.? No
GER Cls 2 Det. 03/13/90 by ---of State Scheduled compliance date: 05/04/90
Actual compliance date: 05/07/90 Enforcerrent action\s). Days 04/10/1990 120 S 28
Prl. Branch: Oesc. : GEt.iERATOR-.ALL R.EQU I REMEtJTS I. OVERSIGHT)
C0!ffi°:E1;t: O Days out of compl. (to toct3y)
Propc,sed Pen. F1nal Penalty
0 0
Re9. t,_;r,ie: P.E:Q. cite: Pa1d to Qate Enf. type o 120 written Informal
•
R Cls 2 Oet. 06/23/89 by ---0f State Pri. _ Branch: Scheduled compl \ance date: 07/31/89 COITTT,ent: .4ctua l compl i a nee date: 07 /25/89 O Days out of comp1 . ( to today)
Desc. : GDlERATC.!t-A.LL REQU I (~EMENTS t OVERSIGHT)
Ren. type: Reg.cite:
Enforcement action(s). Days Pr8posed Pen. Final Penalty 07/24/1989 !20 S 31 0 0
Paid t0 Date Enf. t·'}pe O 120 'fir H ten Informal
GER Cls 2 Det. 05/25/88 by
Scheduled comp 1 ', ance date: Actual compllance date: Enforcement actlon(sJ. 10/07/1988 120 S
of State i0/24/88 10/24/88 Days 43
GER Cls 1 Det. 10/02/85 by ---of State Scheduled compliance date: 01/02/86 Actual compllance date: 11/01/85 Enforcement actlon(sJ. Days 10/31/1985 120 S 29
GER Cls 1 Det. 03/22/85 by ---of State Scheduled compl1ance date: 05/01/85 Actual compllance date: 05/01/85 Enforcement actlon(sJ. Days 04/10/1985 120 S 19
GER Cls 1 Det. 01/02/85 by of State
•
Scheduled compl1ance date: / / Actual compllance date: 01/02/86 --No enforcement actlon. --
GER Cls 1 Det. 12/08/83 by ---of State Scheduled compllance date: 01/16/84 Actual compllance date: 01/18/84 Enforcement actlon(sJ. Days 12/16/1983 120 S 8
Fr1. _ Branch: lJesc. :GENERATOS:-ALL REQUIRE!',1ENTS {OVERSIGHT)
Corrment: O Days out of compl .(to today) Proposed Pen. Flnal Penalty
0 0
Re~.type: Reg.cite: Paid to Date Enf. type O 120 Wrltten Informal
Prl. Branch: Desc. :GENERATOR-ALL REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT) Comnent: REVIEWED FINANCIAL TEST (VIOLATION SUDDEN LIABILITY) o Days out of compl.(to today)
Proposed Pen. Flnal Penalty 0 0
Reg.type: Reg.clte: Paid to Date Enf. type o 120 Wr1tten Informal
Prl. _ Branch: Desc. :GENERATOR-ALL REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
Coornent: o Days out of compl.(to today) Proposed Pen. Flnal Penalty
0 0
Reg. type: Reg. clte: Pald to Date Enf. type 0 120 Wrltten Informal
Pr1. _ Branch: Desc. :GENERATOR-ALL REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
coornent: o Days out of compl.(to today J Reg.type: Reg.c1te: Enf. type
Pr1. _ Branch: Desc. :GENERATOR-ALL REQUIREMENTS (OVERSIGHT)
conrnent: o Days out of compl.(to today) Reg.type: Reg.clte: Proposed Pen. Flnal Penalty Paid to Date Enf. type o o o 120 written Informal
Seq#: S0007
Seq.#: SOOC6
Seq#; S0005
Seq . # : 50003
Seq.#: S0002
Seq.#: S0004
Seq.#: SOOOl
***********************.***••-~··•···••******************** * RCRIS: CM &~nforcement AddlUpdate Scan Screen *
**************************-·***************»********************************* . ::::::-::-:--..~ -* Handler ID: NCD000770487 Name: JOHNSON CONTROLS BATT GRP INC *
* Location St: 2701 JOHNSON CONTROLS DR City: KERNERSVILLE *
****************************************************************************** * Place an 'X' next to the record and press ENTER. *
* * Action Date Seq. Agency
* -----------------
* 04101990 008 s
* 07241989 007 s
* 10071988 006 s
* 10311985 0.04 s
* 04101985 002 s
* 12161983 001 s
* * * *
Action Type -----------120
120
120
120
120
120
Br. Person ------
/JOV
Attorney --------
* * * * * * * * * * * * * ****************************************************************************** * ENTER-Continue F3-Exit F4-ID Screen F9-Up FlO-Down *
******************************************************************************
* * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * *.******'Ii-***_*_*,*****·*******·•************************ * RCRIS: CM & (E Violation_µd/Update Scan Screen *
* * * * * * * ••••••••••••••••••••••••• *"""'""'• .. ·•·•·•11:••·* * * * * * * •••••••• *. * ••••••••• *• •••••
• Handler ID: NCD000770487 Name: JOHNSON CONTROLS BATT GRP INC •
*Location St: 2701 JOHNSON CONTROLS DR City: KERNERSVILLE *
******************************************************************************
* Place an 'X' next to the record and press ENTER. •
* C ::t::~:: *
* Agency Seq. Area L Type Pers. Scheduled Resolved *
* ---------------------------------•
* s 0007 GER 2 031390 05041990 050790 *
* s 0006 GER 2 062389 07311989 072589 •
* s 0005 GER 2 082588 10241988 102488 •
* s 0004 GER 1 010285 010286 • * s 0003 GER 1 100285 01021986 110185 •
* s 0002 GER 1 032285 05011985 050185 *
* s 0001 GER 1 120883 01161984 011884 •
* • * *
* *
******************************************************************************
* Enter-Continue F3-Exit F4-ID Screen F9-Up FlO-Down •
*****•***•**•***•*********•••******••································••*******
• •
PAGE 2
State North Carolina Database Run 01/15/98 by Jim Edwards
Enforcement Report with Penalty Data \vlo1aUons addressed are not sr,own 1n th\s report )
State: NC
Resp. Enf Agency Person Branch Date Enf Type
NCD000770487 JOHNSON CON1KuLS BATT GRP INC
state 12/16/1983 120
State 04/10/1985 120
.tate 10/31/1985 120
;;it ate i0i07/1988 120
State 07/24/1989 120
St.::i.te 04/i0/1990 120
Total penal_ties. NC :
•
Proposed Penalty
Fl r,a 1
Penalty
KERf<tRSVILLE
'tO $0
$0 $0
$0 $0
$0 $0
$0 $0
$0 $0
$0 $0
Pay Payment
Seq Date
Branch:
Payment
Amount
County Code: NC067
$0
•
************••·········•···••vr*~, ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
* RCRIS: CM &"E Evaluation Ad<i/Update Scan Screen •
******************************~***************'******************************
* Handler ID: NCD000770487 Nae: JOHNSON CONTROLS BATT GRP INC •
*Location St: 2701 JOHNSON CONTRO S-DR--------City: KERNERSVILLE •
******************************************************************************
• Place an 'X' next to the record and press ENTER. •
* * Action Date Seq
* -----------• 062096 011
* 072595 010
* 072092 009
* 082091 008
* 050790 017
* 031390 016
* 072589 015
* 062389 014
* 102488 013 • 082588 012
* 071387 011 • 081186 009
* 010286 010
* 110185 008
* 100285 006
* 080285 005
* 050385 004 • 032285 003
* 010285 007
* ~0.118_8_4 002 --
* 120883 001
* * * *
* * * * * ----
Agency Br./Person ----------------s 01 NC008 s 01 NC008 s 01 NC008 s 01 NC008
s
s s
s
s
s
s
s
s NCl
s
s
s
s
s
s s ----s
Type
CEI
CEI
CEI
CEI
CSE
CEI
CSE
CEI
CSE
CEI
CEI
CEI
CSE
FRR
FRR
CEI
CSE
CEI
FRR
CSE
CEI
Reason ------
• • • • • • • • • •
* • • -.. -
* * * * * •
* * • •
* * * * • • • •
* *
JAM CS 8. HUNT JR,
GoVCRNOR
.. ·· WAYNE: MCDEVITT:
I r ~ ScCRCTARY //'':.
• NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
CERTIFIEJ) MAIL
RETllRI\ RECCll'T REQUEST£1J
December 15, 1997
Mr. Rich Newberry, Plant Manager
Johnson Controls
Post Office Box I 667
Kemerville, North Carolina 27285
Dear Mr. Newberry:
RE: Johnson Controls/Globe Battery
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
NCO 000 770 487
Enclosed is an Order to Submit Notice of, and to Record, an Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site. This Order is being issued to you pursuant to North Carolina General Statute l 30A-3 l 0.8, because you are .the owner of property which has been determined by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources to be or include an inactive hazardous substance or waste disposal site. Note that you are directed by the Order to inform the Department within thirty (30) days of receipt whether you intend to comply with the Order. In addition to recording the notice after approval ofit by the Department, you should take measures to cont:J:o] site access and post notices at the site.
North Carolina Superfund Section files are available for inspection by appointment only. Please contact Scott Ross at [phone] ext. 328, if you would like to schedule an appointment.
If you have questions,you may contact John Walch at (9 I 9) 733-2801, ext. 282; or me, ext. 284.
S'.;l-c;rely, 1 '-~
~---<.l ~ ...
Charlotte Jesne , Head
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
Superfund Section
CVJ/N.V.'/slb/sh(C:\l.'P\l.'IN60\WPDOCSIR.ECORDATV0Hl'\SOK.REC)
RE\'.09/05/97
Enclosure
401 OBERI..IN ROAD, SUITE ISO, RALEIGH, NC 27605
PHONE919·733-4996 FAX 919·71S-3605 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ AF'F'IRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER· 50% RECYCLCD/10% POST•CONSUMCR PAPER
• NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF FORSYTH
TO: Mr. Rich Newberry, Plant Manager
Johnson Contois
IN RE: Johnson Controls/Globe Battery
Old Greensboro Road
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
ORDER TO SUBMIT,
AND TO RECORD, NOTICE OF
INACTIVE HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCE OR WASTE
DISPOSAL SITE
DOCKET NUMBER 97-SF-134
This Order is issued pursuant to North Carolina General Statute (N.C.G.S.) l 30A-3 l 0.8. The undersigned is authorized to issue the Order for the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources ("the Department"). The Director of the Division of Waste Management has determined that:
I. Johnson Controls, Inc. is the owner of the property located on Old Greensboro Road in Wintson-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina.
2. As a result of sampling conducted by Greenhorne and O'Mara, Inc: for North Carolina Superfund Section at the subject property on May 9, 1991, the following hazardous substances within the meaningofN.C.G.S. 130A-310(2),have been found to be present in soil:
Lead
IT IS HEREBY DETERMINED THAT AN INACTIVE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE OR WASTE DISPOSAL SITE EXISTS AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR PURPOSES OF N.C.G.S. l30A-310.8.
PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING DETERMINATION AND N.C.G.S. B0A-310.8, JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. IS HEREBY ORDERED TO SUBMIT, WITHIN ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY (180) DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS ORDER, A SURVEY PLAT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY PREPARED AND CERTIFIED BY A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, WITH THE FOLLOWING APPEARING IN THE TITLE BLOCK: "NOTICE OF INACTIVE HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE OR WASTE DISPOSAL SITE." Within thirty (30) days of receipt of this Order, Johnson Controls Inc. is directed to inform the Department in writing, at the address listed following paragraph 9 below, whether Johnson Controls Inc. intends to comply with this Order. Any plat (hereinafter "Notice") submitted pursuant to this Order shall meet the requirements ofN.C.G.S. 47-30 for maps and plats and any requirements of the Forsyth County Register of Deeds, and shall include (ALL CONTENTS OF THE PLAT MUST BE DRAWN IN INDELIBLE INK):
I. property lines, north arrow, scale, and bearings and distances as appearing on the deed;
•
2
2. with respect to permanently surveyed benchmarks, location and dimensions of areas
of the property where hazardous substances are known to have been disposed (only
areas with distinct boundaries such as landfills, trenches, and open impoundments or
pits; not spills or other indistinct releases);
3. the quantity of each hazardous substance disposed on the property, if known;
4. with respect to permanently surveyed benchmarks, the location of on-site wells
(potable, production,"monitoring and any other type) where hazardous substances
have been detected in groundwater, unless each hazardous substance detected has an
associated I SA NCAC 2L groundwater standard and the concentration is below such
standard;
5. a list of hazardous substances known to be present in each environmental medium
(soil, groundwater, surface water, and sediment);
6. the printed name(s) and title(s) and properly notarized signature(s) of individual(s)
with authority to legally bind the property owner(s) (printed text, signatures, and
notary seals, as with all markings on the plat, must be made in indelible ink);
7. the following language: "The areas and type of contamination depicted upon the map ·
are approximations derived from the best available information at the time of filing.";
8. the following language positioned in the upper left comer of the plat:
" _________ for the purposes ofN.C.G.S. 130A-3 I 0.8.
William L. Meyer, Director
Division of Waste Management
NORTH CAROLINA
WAKE COUNTY
I, , a Notary Public of said County and State, ·---------------·
do hereby certify that did personally appear and
sign before me this the ___ day of _______ , I 9_
Notary Public (signature)
( official seal)
My commission expires ______________ , 19_."; and
• •
9. Surveyor's certification and seal (using a permanent ink stamp).
The Notice shall be sent to the Department addressed as follows:
John Walch
North Carolina Division of Waste Management
· Superfund Section
· · Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
401 Oberlin Road -Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27605
3
After the Department approves and certifies the Notice, Johnson Controls, Inc. shall, within fifteen (15) days of receiving said approval:
I. file a certified copy of the Notice in the Forsyth County Register of Deeds' office; and
2. send to the Department, addressed as required above, a certified copy of the Notice affixed with the seal of the Register of Deeds and reflecting the book and page nwnber where recorded and a copy of the page in the granter index where the Notice is referenced.
WHEN THE PROPERTY OR ANY PART OF IT IS SOLD, LEASED, CONVEYED OR TRANSFERRED, JOHNSON CONTROLS INC. SHALL PLACE THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE IN THE DESCRIPTION SECTION OF THE DEED OR OTHER INSTRUMENT OF TRANSFER IN NO SMALLER TYPE THAN THAT USED IN THE BODY OF THE DEED:
"This property has been used as a hazardous substance or waste disposal site. A Notice oflnactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site is recorded in the Forsyth County Register of Deeds' office at Book--~ Page __ . Questions concerning this matter may be directed to the North Carolina Division of Waste Management, Superfund Section, Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch, 401 Oberlin Road, Suite 150, Raleigh, NC 27605."
SO ORDERED, this the -~J -5_~ __ day of LJcQ-;N\~
JL cl rv lDJ yJ
William L. Meyer, Dire~tor
Division of Waste Management
, 199_]_
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
•
I., a:iso~: Wish -_.tO., receiv_1;:' the
following services {for· an extra,. ~
fee):
·;
~
1. 0 AddresSee' s Address ~
.. • State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
Mr. Gary Bennett
_ September 30, 1997
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Science and Ecosystem Support Division
980 College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30605-2720
•
DEHNR
Subject: Data Reinvestigation Request for Antech Limited CLP
RAS/SAS Analytical Results (EPA Case No. 97-0329)
Johnson Controls -Expanded Site Inspection (ESI)
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
US EPA ID: NCO 000 770 487.
Dear Mr. Bennett:
The North Carolina Superfund Section requests that US EPA Region IV Science and
Ecosystem Support Division (SESD) re-investigate the routine and special analytical service sample
analytical results produced under the contract laboratory program with Antech Limited at the subject
site. The request is necessary to determine whether spectral interference is correctable for
contaminants flagged as "JN" in the data validation package qualifiers report.
The Johnson Controls facility uses large quantities of lead in the manufacture of automotive
batteries. Since lead was assigned a "JN" flag, the results for lead are considered unusable for HRS
purposes. This result adversely affects the ESI by precluding the use oflead in the establishment
of contamination in onsite sources and to attribute any potential releases of lead found in off site
receptors to the onsite sources. The apparently conflicting quality assurance/quality control results
for several matrix spike and blind spike recoveries also prevents an accurate determination of the
bias that may be present in many of the samples.
As a result, the North Carolina Superfund Section would like to request that all the soil
samples that were affected by "JN" flags be re-evaluated to determine if the spectral interference is
correctable to the point that the data would be considered reliable and legally defensible. If not, the
P.O. Box 29603, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-9603 Telephone 919:733.4995
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% Recycled / 10% Post-Consumer Paper
' ' ,
Letter to Mr. Bennett • EPA SESD
Page 2.
North Carolina Superfund Section requests that all the soil samples be re-extracted and re-analysed
in accordance with the CLP Statement of Work, and data resubmitted to EPA for validation.
Thanks for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, please contact
Douglas Moore at [phone], e~t. 315.
cc: Pat DeRosa
Phil Vorsatz
Irene Williams
Sincerely,
Douglas Moore
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
P.O. Box 29603, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-9603 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% Recycled / 10% Post-Consum~r Paper
•
RECEIVED
SEP 09 1997
SUPERFUND SECTION
Fa.~ number: 733 -4 ~/
• I.,_.,.,.,
NCSU Dept MEAS
Campus Box 8208
Raleigh, NC 27696-8208
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Tc,,tal number of pages (including cover): _7 __
/.le:lpihg to define and predict the clin1ote fA.ctors fhpt impact the people of North Carolina
9VUlSlS6l6:xe3 3JI330 31~WI7J J N
i
•
Sep;'=mber 9, 1997
Ste.t,a Climate Office of North Carolina
Dept MEAS
NCSU Campus Box 8208
Haleigh, NC 27695-8208
Hello Mr. Moore,
•
Th~lilk you for your request weather conditions for the Winston Salem area.
am ,;ending you a file containing the hourly readlngs1taken at the Winston
airport. This is not a NWS station and readings are taken when someone
happens to be there to do them. So ... there are many missing readings. To
help fill in some of these gaps, I am including the hourly observations taken at
the Greensboro airport. Unfortunately, precipitation is only given as a daily total.
(Hr,1;rly precipitation comes out in the monthly summaries but there is a lag of
about 2 months.) If you have any questions regarding this data, please don't
hesitate to contact the office.
Hava a nice day.
illy 1-b~
Kell,, Funk
Sti L1 Climate Office
sv:01 L6, 6 das 3JIJJO 311:JWilJ J N
"'fr
•
N C CL~NIATE OFFICE,9/11/97 10:18 AM -0400,haspll.505
Posted-O.V, Tue, 9 Sep 1997 10:18:08 -0400 (Ell'l')
Date: '!\le, 9 Sep 1997 10:18:08 -0400 (EDT)
Fran.; NC (:.u~TE OFFICE ,c;rn;:::a,u9c;:in.-u.o;.dnr.~tacc,sc.ul;i~
'l'o: sco@cui\Nlus .rreas. ncau. edu
SUbject: J.,c,apll, 505
PRELIMINl\RY HOURLY WEATHER OllSERVATIONS for WINSTON-SALEM, NC
------OA'.:.'E AIR REL -----wnm----llllRA
MON DD YE/\H HOUR SI!Y_Mt TEMP HUM OW?r DIR SI>D OOST =• lUiMl\PJ< ( • )
f' F MPH MPH n;. ---------···------------------------------.... --~--------------------...... -----------.....
Aug 11 1,'.)"," 0:00 m m m m m m m m
Aug 11 19~)7 1:00 m m m m .. m m m
Aug ll 19~17 2:00 m m m m !It m m m Aug ll 19!ft 3:00 m m m m m m m m
Ju.,g 11 19~r, 4:00 m m m m m m m m
Aua 11 19~~·; 5,00 m m m m .. m m ..
Aug 11 1%'7 6:00 m m m m m m m m
Aug ll 19~)7 7:00 N/A m m m CAL 0 ro
Aug 11 1997 8:00 m m m m m m m m
A.ug 11 1997 9,00 SUNN.-72 87 69 CAL 0 30.~4 FOO
AUg 11 19~7 10:00 SUNNY 77 79 70 CAL 0 30.23
Aug 11 lWi 11:00 m m m m ro m m m
AUg11 1~~7 12:00 WSUNNY 81 65 68 CAL 0 30.24
Aug 11 19r7 13100 ,o:,sumr, 84 59 6B CAL 0 30.23
Aug 11 1997 14:00 MOsutm'f 84 59 6B CAL 0 30.21
Aug 11 19~i7 15:00 MOsutm'f 88 48 66 CAL 0 30.20
Aug 11 19~1'/ 16:Q0 MOSUNNY 88 52 68 CAL 0 30.18 AUg 11 19~'7 l.?iCO M!)SUNNl{ 88 52 68 CAL 0 30.17
Aug 11 19Sn 18:00 MDSUIOO' 86 51 66 SW B 30.16
Aug ll 1997 19:00 MOCLDY 86 51 66 SW B 30.16 Aug 11 19~7 20:00 P'l"CLDY 84 55 66 s 12 30.16
Aug 11 1997 2L00 111 111 m m m rn m m AUg 11 19!'7 22:00 m m m m m m m ..
Aug 11 19~·; 23,00 m m m m m m m m -----------------------------------------------------------Aug 11 199·; A'VcJ::'a.ge 83 60 67 2 na 30.20
sm_wx ATM!' HUM ~ WDIR WSPD GUST PRES REMARl\(a) -------~-----------------~----------------------------------Aug 12 1997 o,oo rn m rn m m m m m AUg 12 19.97 1:00 m m m m m m m m
Aug 12 195'1' 2:00 m m ,. m m m m m Aug 12 1997 3:00 ID m Ill m 111 m m m Aug-12 1991 4,00 m m m m m m m m Aw 12 1997 5:00 m m m m m m m m
Aug 12 1997 6:00 m rn m m m m m rn Aug 12 199'/ 7:00 m m ro m m m m m
Aug 12 1997 A,0o m m m m m m m m Aug 12 199'i 9:00 PrstlNNY 79 74 70 CAL 0 30.21 Aug 12 199'.' 10:00 PrstlNNY 82 67 70 CAL 0 30.21 l\ug 12 1997 11:00 PrSUNNY 84 67 72 CAL 0 30.22
J\ug 12 199"7 12:00 PTSUNNY 86 5~ 70 CAL 0 30.22 Aug 12 199'1 13:00 m m m m m m rn m Aug 12 1997 14:00 CLOUOY 86 59 70 CAL 0 30.19 Aug-12 1997 15:00 CLOUIJI' 88 59 72 CAL 0 30 .18 AUg 12 1~97 16:00 1-TSul<NY 88 55 70 CAL 0 30.16 Aua 12 1997 17,00 MJSUlONV 90 S2 70 CAL 0 30 .14
Printed fo,· State Climate Office of North Carolina <[e-mail]
m ·-:1 617:0l L6, 6 das 917171SlS6l6:X1?.:1 3JI.:l.:IO 31~WI7J J N
1
I
• •
N C CLIMATE OFFICE,9/9/97 10:18 AM :0400,haspli.505 2
Aug 12 1997 18:00 m m II\ m m m rn m
Aug 12 19~~7 19:00 PTCLDY 88 55 70 s 8 30.13
Aug 1:) 1997 20,00 PTCLD'l 8G 59 70 0 8 30.14
Aug 12 19~7 21:00 = 84 67 72 s 8 30.15
Allg 12 1997 22:00 m m m m ,. m m m
Aug 12 19~'7 23:00 m m II\ m m m m m
-------------------··-- -------------------------------~------
Aug 12 1997 Average 86 61 71 2 na 30.18
SKY_Wl{ ATMP HOM :MET l'IDIR WSPD GUST PRES REMARK(s)
------------------------------------------------------------Aug 13 19~-'7 0:00 m m II\ m m m m m
AUg 13 1997 1:00 m m m m m m m m
Aug 13 191'7 2:00 m m m m m m m Ill
Aug 13 19~17 3;00 m m m m m m m m
Aug 13 19\'7 4,00 m m m m In m m m
AUg 13 1997 5:00 ti\ m II\ m ·IU m m m
Aug 13 19(7 6:00 m m m m m m m m
Aug 1.3 1:3?7 7;00 = 73 90 70 CAI, 0 30,ll
Aug 13 1957 8:00 MllCLDY 7] 90 70 s 6 30.12
Aug 13 1997 9,00 Pl'SUNNY 75 84 70 s 5 30.12
Aug 13 19n 10:CO PTSUNNY 81 74 n s 7 30.10
AUg 13 1997 11:00 MOSUNNY m m m w 9 30.10
"'f>' AUg" 13 1997 12:00 PTSUNNY 84 67 72 SW 7 30.09
Aug 13 19~17 13:00 MDSUNNY 86 52 68 SW 9 30.07
AUg 13 1997 14:00 PTSUNNY 88 55 70 SW 7 30.05
Aug 13 19?.'/ 1!3:00 TSTM 77 87 73 N lZ 30.04
Aug-13 19~'7 16:00 P'!'S!ThlNY 82 74 n N 6 )0.01 = Aug 13 19'7 17:00 PTSUNNY 88 59 n s 6 29.99
Aug 13 19'7 18:00 PTSUNNY 86 59 70 SW 5 29.98
Aug 13 19~7 19:00 MilCLDY 86 63 n s 5 -~.98
Aug 13 19~'7 20,00 MDCLDV 84 67 72 5 6 ~9.97
Aug 13 19E'7 21:00 CI.OllDY 84 67 72 s 6 29.97
Allg 13 19E'7 22,00 m m m m m m m m
Aug 13 19~•'} 23:00 rn m m m m m m m
------------------------------------------------------------
Aug 13 1997 Average 82 71 71 6 na 30.05
-----------------~--~-------------------~----------------------------------·---
POil AVEPACE 84 64 70 4 "" 30.13
Pl!RIOD_OP_RECORD_5UMM71I!Y
Highest Tenp ~ 90 LOWest ~ = 72
The status Qf daily data in the CIRRUS Q€ltaba5e ia aa tollows:
WeathQr wi."="u data ava.il.~le through OfJ/09/97
l'reliminary data from National Climatic Data Center thru 05/31/97
:Final qual i.ty-controlled data from National Climatic Data CenteJ:" thru 02/28/97
Printed fo;' State Climate Office of Nor-th Cai-olloa .;sco@cumulus,meas.ncsu.ed 2
170'd OS:Ol .!.6, 6 das 9t'l7lSlS6l6:Xe.:J 3)I.:J.:JO 31~WI7J J N
,,,,,.,
• •
N C CLIMATE OFFICE,9/9/97 10:18 AM -0400,haspl2.S05
Posted-Dace: TUe, 9 Sep 1997 lG,18,09 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 10:18:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: NC CLIMATE OFFICE q\c1:1u0ci:r~.dnr.state_sc.us>
TO: sco@cvro.u:us.mea.s.ncsu.edu
subject: haspl2, 505
PllllLIMINl\RY HOURLY WEA'.IHER OSSERVATIONS for GFJ;;ENSBORO,
------DP.i:1'.E ------AIR R:L -----wmo~---BARA
N::
MON DD YEAR HOUR SKY_Wl{ TEMP HLM ""1PI' DIR SPD GUST PRES IUiW,I\K(o)
F F MPH MPH IN. -------------------~-------------------------~----------------ft-----------------
Aug 11 1997 0:00 ..:x:u:,,,: 68 l>O 65 CAL 0 30 .21
A\lQ 11 1997 1,00 = 66 93 64 SW 3 30.20
Aug 11 1997 2:00 MDCWY 67 93 65 C1\L 0 30_20
Aug 11 1997 3:00 = 66 97 65 w 5 30_20
AUg 11 1997 4;00 = 67 97 66 CAL 0 30.18
Aug 11 1997 ~,oo = 65 97 64 SW 3 30.17
Allg 11 1997 6:00 FOO 65 97 64 CAL 0 30.18 VSB 1/4 Allg U 1997 7,oo Fl'.lG 65 100 65 C1\L 0 30.20 VSB 1/4
Aug 11 1997 8:00 FOG 66 100 66 CAL 0 30.20 VSB 1/4 Aug 11 1997 9,00 SUNN'/ 72 87 68 CAL 0 )G.23
AUg 11 1997 10:00 SONNY 76 79 69 SW 5 30_22
Aug 11 1997 11,00 SUNNY 80 65 67 = 0 30_22 ' AUg 11 19'.lr 1.2:00 CLOUDY 82 61 67 m 3 30.22
Aug 11 1997 ll,00 MOSUNIIY B< 57 67 CAL 0 )0_20
Aug 11 1997 14:00 Pl'SIJNNY 85 53 66 NW 7 30_19
Aug 11 1997 15:00 MOSIJNNY 86 51 66 SW 3 30.18
AUg 11 1997 16:00 MOSUNNY 85 51 65 SW 7 30.16
AUg 11 1997 17;00 MOSUNNY 65 50 64 CAL 0 30.L4
Aug ll 1997 18:00 Pl'SIJNNY 85 51 65 CAL 0 30_14
Aug 11 1997 19:00 MOCLDY 84 53 65 SW 6 J0_13
AUg 11 1997 20:00 MOCLDY 82 61 6? SW 7 30.14 AUg 11 l.!-97 31100 MOCLOY 79 67 67 SK 5 30_1,
Aug 11 1997 22:00 MOCLOY' 77 74 68 SW 5 30_17
Au9 ll 1997 23:00 MOCLDY 75 79 68 SW 3 30.17 ----------------------Y~-----------------------------------~
Aug 11 1997 AVC1:.age 76 75 66 3 na 30.18
SKY_WX ATM!' HUM mlPT WDIR WSPD GVST PRES Rl'MARKfs) ----------------------~·--------~------------~--------------
A\Jg 12 1997 o,oo = 74 82 68 w 5 30,17
Aug 12 1997 1,00 = n 84 67 SW 5 30.17 Aug 12 1997 2:00 Pl'CLDY 72 84 67 SW 5 30.16 Al.lg 12 19£'7 3:00 PTCLll\' 71 87 67 SW 5 30.15 A.ug 12 1997 4:00 P'l'CullY 70 90 67 SW 3 30.15 Aug 12 1997 5,00 PTCLDY 10 90 67 w J 30,15 Allg 12 1997 6:00 PTCUlY 70 90 67 w 6 30.16 J.ug 12 1997 7:00 IIOCLDY 70 90 67 w J 30-17 FOO Allg12 1997 A:00 CLOOtlY 72 90 69 CAL 0 30.18 Aug-12 1997 9:00 CUJ!JDY 78 76 70 NW 6 30,19 AUQ 12 1997 10:00 PTSUNNY 81 69 70 CJ>L 0 J0_2Q Al.lg 12 1997 11:00 Cl.OUIJY 84 59 68 N 3 30.20 Aug 12 1997 12,00 CLOUOY 86 55 68 CAL 0 30.19 Aug-12 1997 13:00 CT-01.lllY 85 59 69 CAL 0 30.18 AUg 12 1997 14:00 P'I'S1rnNY 84 67 72 Cl\l., 0 3D.17 Aug 12 1997 15_:00 CL01.lilY 87 57 70 SW 7 30_15 Av.g 12 1951? 16:00 CLOUDY 88 ~o 67 SW 10 16 30.14 Aug 12 1997 17:00 CIDUDY BB 54 69 s 9 JO ,12
Printed for State Climate Office of North Carolina <sco@cumnlus,meas.ncsu.ed
SO'd os:01 L6, 6 das 91717lSlS6l6:Xl'.:J 3)I.:J.:JO 3lt/WI7)) N
1
1
•
N C CL1MATE OFFICE,9/9/97 10:18 AM -0400,basp12.505 2
Aug U 1997 18;00 = 88 54 69 SW 10 30.11
Aug 12 199? 19:00 CLOUDY 86 ~9 70 SW 10 30 .ll
,;If/ Allg 12 19:37, 20:0C = 84 63 70 s 7 30_12
Aug 12 1997° 21:0C PTCLDY 80 72 70 s 6 30.13
Aug 12 1997 22:00 l?l"CLDY 79 74 70 SW 7 30.15
Aug 12 1997 JJ:00 MOCLDY 78 74 69 SW 7 30.15 ----------~~---~-----------------~--~-----------------------Aua 12 1997 Averaa~ 79 72 69 5 16 30.16
sKY_Wl( ATMP HUM IMPT WDIR WSPD GUST PRES Rl!MIIRK ( s )
-----~~~----------------------•w---------------~-••---------
Aug 13 1997 0:00 = 77 76 69 fJW 7 30.15
Aug l3 1997 1:00 = 76 79 69 SW 7 30.13
Aug 13 19n 2;00 l'I'CLDY 74 82 68 SW 6 30.11
Allg 13 19:n 3;00 Pl'CLDY 73 84 68 SW 5 30.10
Aug 13 19:37 4,00 Pl'CLDY 7J. 90 68 SW 5 JO.OB
Aug 13 1997 5:00 PTCUJY 71 90 6B SW 6 30.08
Aug 13 1997 6:00 P'Jx:IDY 70 93 68 SW 7 30.08
AUg 13 H~7 7;00 MDCI.DY 71 90 68 SW 10 30.09
"'""' 13 19'..17 8,00 HOCLDY 73 87 69 SW 9 30.09
Aug l3 19'17 9:00 MOS\Nri 77 79 70 SW 13 30.09
AUg 13 19Y7 10;00 PrSONNY 79 74 70 SW 13 30.08
Aug 13 1997 u,oo PrSUNNY 82 67 70 SW 12 30.08
Aug 1:l 19~n 12,00 Pl'SUNNY 85 61 70 SW 9 21 30.06
Aw 13 1997 13: 00 Pl'SUNNY BB 54 69 S'J1 13 30.05
Aug 13 19~!7 14:00 Pl'SUNNY 89 50 68 SW B 20 30.02
!lug 13 1997 15:00 CLOOD'l 86 55 68 SW 14 30.00
Aug 13 1997 16,00 P'l"SUNNY 78 85 73 ll 3 3p.oo
Aug 13 1997 17:00 MDSUNNY 84 72 04 m 3 29.97
AUg 13 1997 18;00 MDSUNNY 85 63 71 SW 10 29.96
Aug 13 1997 19,00 MOCLDY 85 63 71 SW 9 29.96
Aug 13 1997 20,00 = 82 6, 71 SW 7 29.95
Aua 13 19~!? 21:00 MOCLlJY 80 74 71 SW G 29.95
AUg 13 1997 22:00 MOcLIJY 79 79 72 SW 5 29.97
Aug '.i.3 19('7 23:C0 CWU!JY 76 87 72 s 3 29.97
------------------------------------------------------------AUa 13 1997 Average 79 75 10 8 20 30.04
------~--------------------------------------------·---------------------------
l?OR AV13l"'J',GE 78 74 68 5 19 30.13
E!UOD_OF__RF.CORD_smw.RY
Highest'. Teop = 89 Lowest Temp = 65
The statUE-of daily data in the CIRRUS database ii, as follows,
We.at.her win: &ta available thz"ough 09/09/97
Preliminary dat~ from Nation.,.! climati~ Data center thru 05/31/97
Final quality-controlled data frc:m National Climatic Data Center thru 02/29/9?
Printed for State Climate Office of North Carolina <[e-mail] 2
90"d lS:Ol L6, 6 das 91717lSlS6l6:Xe.:J 3JI.:l.:IO 318WI7J J N
•
N C CLIMATE OFFICE,9/9/97 10:18 AM -0400,month3.505 1
Post<!d-ooc~: Tue, 9 sep 1997 10:18:09 -0400 (EDT)
oace: TUe, 9 Sep 1997 10:18:09 -0400 (BDT)
From! NC CL.u.m.TE OFPJ:C'B ~ttOll:iUGc:i.rruJ:1,dnr,8tate.oo.uoi>
To: sco@c·Jmul us . meas . ncsu. edu
SUbject: month:l.505
St.tion: ( 313630) C:REmJSBORQ_WSO....A)lU'ORT I NC
Yearcl997 ,ronth=8:
year zrm dd tobs prep t:max tmin mean fillOW depth
(u,) (F) (I") (F) (in) (in)
1997 08 O:t 20 0.00 83 56 70 .9_9m -99m
1997 08 o,, 20 0.00 87 60 74 -9 -9ni -99m
1997 08 O:J 20 0.00 88 63 76 .9_9m -99m
1997 08 0'1 20 0.26 90 67 79 -9.9m -9911\
1997 08 O:.'i 20 0_13 83 54 74 .9_9m -99m
1997 08 OG 20 0.00 79 58 69 -9.9m -99m
1997 08 O'I 20 0.00 79 64 n -9.9m -99m
1997 08 OB 20 o.oo 82 56 69 -9. !lm -9911\
1997 08 09 20 0.00 83 62 73 -9.!hu -99m
1997 08 10 20 0.00 82 67 75 -9.911\ -99m
1997 08 l:l 20 0.00 87 64 76 -9.9m -99m
1997 08 1': 20 0.03 89 69 79 -9.9m -99m
1997 08 U 20 0.03 91 70 81 -9.9rn -99m
1997 08 1,:, 20 0.00 89 71 80 -9.9m -99m
1997 08 15 20 0.00 91 7:l 81 -9.9m -99m
1997 08 16 20 0.00 94 7J 84 -9.9m -99m 1997 08 1') 20 0.00 95 73 84 -9_9m -99m
1997 08 lU 20 0.00 89 74 82 -9.9m -9911\ 1997 08 19 20 0.00 87 66 77 -9.9m -99m
·~r 1997 08 2(1 20 1.26 81 70 76 -9.9m ... 99m i 1997 08 2'.L 20 0.00 83 66 75 -9.9m -99rn
1997 08 2'' " 20 0.00 78 59 69 -9. 9m -99m 1997 08 2) 20 0.00 81 55 68 -9.9m -9911\ '997 08 24 8 0.00 80 55 68 -9.9m -9911\
1997 OQ 2!:; 20 0.24 83 57 70 -9.9m -99m
1997 08 26 w 0.00 83 57 70 -9.9m -99m 1997 08 27 20 0.00 84 63 74 -9.911\ -99m 1997 08 W 20 0.00 90 66 78 -9.9m -99m 1997 08 29 20 0.0~ 88 65 77 -9.9m •99m 1997 OB 30 20 0.00 83 61 72 -9.9m -99m 1997 08 3] 20 0.00 84 66 75 -9.9m -99m
Avg/Sw,, 1,98 85.4 64.l 74.7 -9.9 * Data val 1.tes are for 24 hours ending at time of obs~tion.
The status cf daily aato. in the CIRRUS database is as follows:
We.ather wcl,e data """'ilable throu~h 09/09i97
Preliminary data from llational climatic Data Center thru 05/31/97
Final quality-controlled data f~om National Climatic Data Center thru 02/28/97
Printed fo,r State Climate Office of North Carolina -<[e-mail] I
lS:Ol L6, 6 das 91717lSlS6l6:X1?.:J 3JI.:l.:l0 31~NI7J J N
State of North ca'1a
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
August 21, 1997
Mr. W. Mark Bailey
RMT Consultants, Inc.
100 Verdae Boulevard
Greenville, South Carolina
29607-3825
Subj.: Receipt for Samples Form
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winstons Salem, Forsyth County, NC
US EPA ID: NCD 000 770 487
Dear Mr. Bailey:
Please find attached a copy of the receipt for samples form generated during the Johnson
Controls Expanded Site Inspection. The GPS coodinates for the sampling points will be forwarded
following correction. Thanks for your help and cooperation during the sampling trip. If you have
any further questions, please contact me at [phone], ext. 315.
Sincerely,
Douglas Moore
NC Superfund Section
P.O. Box 27687. Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ l 0% post-consumer paper
•
Memorandum
To: File
Date: August 18, I 997
From: Douglas Moore ~/3ll<-
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
Subj.: Expanded Site Inspection Sampling Trip
Johnson Controls -Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
US EPA ID: NCO 000 770 487.
Monday. August 11.1997
•
On Monday, August 11, 1997, at 09:45, five members of the NC Superfund Section departed
Raleigh to conduct an Expanded Site Inspection at the Johnson Controls facility, located off West
Mountain Road near Winston Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina. The group arrived at the
facility at 12:20 pm, signed in at the front gate and met with Chris Fisher of Johnson Controls.
Mr. Fisher provided a signed access agreement and then directed the teams to a designated area
where the sample teams could erect a tent and prepare samples. While waiting for Mark Bailey and
Lynn Hanna ofRMT Consultants to arrive back from lunch, the group unloaded and set up a tent
at the designated location on an easement in a wooded area near the entrance to the facility. After
Mr. Bailey and Ms. Hanna arrived back, we discussed the proposed sampling plan. The five
members were divided into two sampling teams (Team I consisting of Stephanie Kozel and Douglas
Moore and Team 2 consisting of Rusty Harris-Bishop and Stuart Parker). The fifth member of the
group, Jeanette Stanley, was designated to remain at the tent to prepare sample labels, chain of
custody sheets, and label each days samples. Mark Bailey accompanied Team I to receive split
samples, and Lynn Hanna accompanied Team 2 to receive split samples.
Two aqueous Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) trip blanks was prepared by Jeanette Stanley at
the tent by transferring organic free water to two 40 ml vials which were pre-preserved with 4 drops
of I: I HCL. The organic free water was obtained from the State Laboratory of Public Health earlier
that morning and carried in the field. Two sets of trip blanks were prepared in this fashion and a set
of trip blanks was carried by each sampling team and placed inside sample coolers to accompany
the samples collected during the entire sampling trip. Team I received trip blank "JC-001-TB" and
Team 2 received trip blank "JC-002-TB" The trip blanks were prepared at 13:45 on August 11,
1997. All aqueous organic VOC 40 ml sample vials used for sampling during the ES! were pre-
acidified with 4 drops of I: I HCL, prior to transporting into the field. The lot numbers of sample
jars were recorded in the logbook (see page I of Team I logbook).
•
A soil VOC trip blank was prepared at 07:30 am on August 11, 1997 by Doug Moore and carried
in the field with the samples. The soil VOC trip blank consisted of quartz sand that was baked in
an oven for 24 hours at 70 degrees celsius and IO ml of organic free water was added to the sand.
The soil VOC trip blank was labeled "JC-003-TB" and carried by Team I in the sample coolers to
accompany the samples collected during the entire sampling trip.
As a courtesy, an extra soil VOC trip blank was carried in the field for use by RMT consultants. Due
to an unfortunate oversight, the extra soil VOC trip blank "JC-003-TB" was not transferred to RMT
Consultants during the sampling trip. Although the sample was kept on ice, and the chain of
custody maintained by sealing the sample in the cooler with custody seals and strapping tape, the
offer to ship the sample to RMT Consultants was rejected by Mark Bailey in a phone conversation
on August 18, 1997.
At Doug Moore's request, Jeanette Stanley prepared a pre-preservative blank at 14:00 on August
11, 1997 using deionized water carried in the field in a large plastic carboy located at the back of
the Team 2 van. The DI water carboy was filled prior to the trip from the DI water outlet located
at Harrington Street Lab, and the pre-preservative blank was preserved with 40 drops of 50 % nitric
acid preservative, that was freshly prepared the previous Friday, August 08, 1997 by Douglas Moore.
The quality control sample was designated as a pre-sampling preservative blank and labeled "JC-
001-PB". A split sample of the pre-preservative blank was prepared for Mark Bailey of RMT
Consultants by the same method using their pre-acidified metals bottle.
During the first day of sampling, Doug Moore and Chris Fisher oversaw and coordinated the
sampling at each teams locations. Jeanette Stanley replaced Doug Moore on Team I and
accompanied Stephanie Kozel while conducting surface water sampling of Salem Lake at the Old
Greensboro Road bridge. Teams I & 2 departed the site around 14:05 to begin sampling of the
furthest downstream sampling points.
Team 2 mobilized to their first sampling point, located at the Salem Lake dam to collect a surface
water sample near the intake. Prior to collection of the sample, Doug Moore and Chris Fisher
arrived at the dam and Doug Moore instructed Team 2 on the calibration and operation of the pH/
TDS/Conductivity Meter, and the turbidity meter.
Each day, the following procedures were followed by each team prior to collecting field
measurements of aqueous samples. The pH/Conductivity/TDS meter was a brand new Coming
Model 90. The Turbidity Meter was a HACH Model 2100P turbidimeter.
The pH meter was I-point field calibrated to the pH 7 .00 standard, and a verification of the
calibration was conducted using the pH 4.0 standard (pH reading = 4.0). The conductivity meter
(Specific Conductivity, hereafter referred to as "S.C." ) was zero calibrated to ambient air, as
instructed by the operations manual, and verification of the calibration was conducted using the 1413
uS conductivity standard (S.C. = 1413 uS). The total dissolved solids (herefter referred to as "TDS")
meter was zero calibrated to ambient air and verification of the calibration was conducted using the
2
• •
TDS/conductivity standard (TDS = 706 mg/I). As the D.O. meter was non-functional, no D.O.
readings were designated for collection. The calibration of the turbidity meter was field verified
using standards within the 0-I 0, 10-100, and I 00-1000 range Nephelometric Turbidity Unit
(hereafter referred to as "NTU") check standards. The field measurements of all calibration and
check standards were recorded in each log book at the beginning of each day to verify the
instruments accuracy and auto ranging capability.
At 15:00 pm, Team 2 collected a surface water grab sample approximately 6 feet from the shoreline
near the Salem Lake dam. The field parameters for the sample were pH= 6.48, Temp= 32.6 ° C,
S.C. = I 02.8 uS, TDS = 51.9 mg/I and turbidity= 4.6 NTU. The sample was collected from the top
6 inches of the water column. There were no odors or visible sheen observed on the water at the
sample location. Samples were collected for VOC, SVOC and Inorganics analyses and the samples
were labeled "JC-020-SW". A split sample was offered and received by Lynn Hanna of RMT
Consultants. Team 2 returned to the sample location of August 12, 1997 at 08:00 and recollected
the GPS reading for the location. GPS file R081212A corresponded to the sample location for JC-
020-SW.
At 15:35 pm, Team I collected the first aliquot of a 3 point vertical composite surface water sample
at the Old Greensboro Road bridge over the northernmost wing of Salem Lake. The aliquot was
collected by pulling approximately 2 liters of water from a point I foot above the bottom of Salem
Lake. The aliquot was collected using a peristaltic pump and vacuum jug arrangement and the
sample was delivered to the 2 Liter amber jug through a clean teflon tube attached to a clean teflon
coated bailer wire and stainless steel conduit sleeve anchor arrangement. A split of the sample was
offered and received by Mark Bailey ofRMT Consultants. The aliquot was split by transferring the
sample, using a clean 125 ml glass sample container, among one 2 liter amber jug, two I liter amber
jugs and two I liter HDPE sample containers.
The aliquot at I foot above the bottom measured as follows: pH= 6.5 @ 29.5 ° C, S.C. = 90.3 uS
@28.4 ° C, TDS = 44.7 mg/I @28.8 ° C, and Turbidity= 26.1 NTU.
At 15:50 pm, Team I collected the second aliquot of the 3 point vertical composite surface water
sample from a point approximately 3 feet above the bottom of Salem Lake. The aliquot was split
with Mark Bailey ofRMT Consultants, and transferred to the containers as mentioned above.
The aliquot at 3 feet above the bottom measured as follows: pH= 6.87@ 29.6 ° C, S.C. = 88.2 uS
@29.2 ° C, TDS = 44.4 mg/I @28.9 ° C, and Turbidity= 34.7 NTU.
At 16:32 pm, Team I collected the third aliquot of the 3 point vertical composite surface water
sample from a point approximately 5 feet above the bottom of Salem Lake. The aliquot was split
with Mark Bailey of RMT Consultants, and transferred to the containers as mentioned above. After
splitting the third aliquot, the SVOC and metals samples were complete and the apparatus was
lowered back to the same sample point (5' above bottom). A sample was drawn into the teflon tube
to use for filling the 40 ml VOA vials. Several sample aliquots were necessary to collect the VOA
3
•
splits. The sample was labeled "JC-018-SW". The sample point corresponds to GPS file
COS! I JSA/B. Photo I and 2 were taken at sample point JC-018-SW.
The aliquot at 5 feet above the bottom measured as follows: pH = 6.58 @ 30.0 ° C, S.C. = I 06. 7 uS
@ 32.2 ° C, TDS = 49.3 mg/I@ 36.1 ° C and 53.5 mg/I@ 32.3 ° C, and Turbidity= 22.8 NTU.
At 16: 15 pm, Team 2 arrived at the background sample located at a box culvert under Linville Road
on the southernmost wing of Salem Lake.
At 16:35 pm, Team 2 collected the first aliquot of a 3 point vertical composite surface water sample
at the Linville Road culvert over the southernmost wing of Salem Lake. The aliquot was collected
by pulling approximately 2 liters of water from a point I foot above the bottom of Salem Lake. The
aliquot was collected using a peristaltic pump and vacuum jug arrangement and the sample was
delivered to the 2 Liter amber jug through a clean teflon tube attached to a clean teflon coated bailer
wire and stainless steel conduit sleeve anchor arrangement. A split of the sample was offered and
received by Lynn Hanna of RMT Consultants. The aliquot was split by transferring the sample,
using a clean 125 ml glass sample container, among one 2 liter amber jug, two I liter amber jugs and
two I_ liter HOPE sample containers.
The aliquot at I foot above the bottom measured as follows: pH= 6.58 @28.9 ° C, S.C. = 132.8
uS, TDS = 66.6 mg/I and Turbidity= 26.5 NTU.
At 16:45 pm, Team 2 collected the second aliquot of the 3 point vertical composite surface water
sample from a point approximately 3 feet above the bottom of Salem Lake. The aliquot was split
with Lynn Hanna of RMT Consultants, and transferred to the containers as mentioned above.
The aliquot at 3 feet above the bottom measured as follows: pH = 6.88 @ 30.0 ° C, S.C. = I 06.6 uS,
TDS = 53.6 mg/I, and Turbidity= 27.2 NTU.
At I 6:55 pm, Team 2 collected the third aliquot of the 3 point vertical composite surface water
sample from a point approximately 5 feet above the bottom of Salem Lake. The aliquot was split
with Lynn Hanna of RMT Consultants, and transferred to the containers as mentioned above. After
splitting the third aliquot, the SVOC and metals samples were complete and the apparatus was
lowered back to the same sample point (5 'above bottom). A sample was drawn into the teflon tube
to use for filling the 40 ml VOA vials. Several sample aliquots were necessary to collect the VOA
splits. The sample was labeled "JC-021-SW". The sample point corresponds to GPS file
ROSI 121A. Photo 3 through 8 were taken at sample point JC-021-SW.
The aliquot at 5 feet above the bottom measured as follows: pH= 4.99@ 33.4 ° C, S.C. = 90.6 uS,
TDS = 45.8 mg/I, and Turbidity= 10.5 NTU.
Between 1700-17: 15 pm, Team I walked along the southeast bank of Salem Lake, about 200 feet
upstream of the Old Greensboro Road bridge, to collect two sets of sediment samples from Salem
4
•
Lake near the Lowery Mill Creek confluence. The sample sets were collected from a small bar
deposited in an eddy current downstream of a fallen tree. The sediments were olive gray, fine-
grained silts with high organic content.
At 17: 15 pm, Stephanie Kozel ("SK") collected a 2-point areal composite about 5 feet apart on the
silt bar for the VOC sediment san1ple. At 17:35, SK collected a 5-point areal composite within a I 0
foot section of the silt bar, and composited in a clean pyrex pan for SVOC and metals analyses. The
sediment sample was labeled "JC-018-SD". The sample point corresponds to GPS file C08 I 12 IA.
A split sample was offered and received by Mark Bailey of RMT Consultants. Photo 3 shows the
VOC sediment sample collected from the silt bar for JC-OJ 8-SD. Photo 4 shows the relative location
of sample point JC-OJ 8-SD, facing SW towards the bridge.
At 17:40 pm, Stephanie Kozel ("SK") collected a duplicate 2-point areal composite about 5 feet apart
on the silt bar for the VOC sediment sample. At 17:50, SK collected a duplicate 5-point areal
composite within a IO foot section of the silt bar, and composited in a clean pyrex pan for SVOC
and metals samples. The sediment sample was labeled "JC-OJ 9-SD". The sample point corresponds
to GPS file C081121A. A split sample was offered and received by Mark Bailey of RMT
Consultants. The second sediment sample, JC-OJ 9-SD, was added to the sampling plan to confirm
the presence of any contaminants found in JC-018-SD. Since the sediment deposits at this location
are typically very heterogeneous, the duplicate sediment sample is considered valid for testing
sample handling variability.
At 18: 10 pm, Team 2 arrived at the background sediment sample location along the south bank of
Salem Lake, about 75-100 feet upstream of Linville Road on the southernmost wing of Salem Lake.
At 18:20 pm, Stuart Parker ("SP") dressed into hip waders and waded about 6 feet from the bank to
collect a sediment sample outside the root mat. SP collected a 2-point areal composite sediment
sample for the VOC sample. The sample was collected from the bottom of Salem Lake using a
stainless steel shepherds crook and stainless steel scoop. At 18:40, SP collected a 5-point areal
composite sediment sample from the bottom of Salem Lake, and composited in a clean pyrex pan
for the SVOC and metals samples. The sediment was an olive gray, fine-grained silt with high
organic content. The sediment came from an reducing environment, as evidenced by a strong sulfide
odor and gas bubbles surfacing in the Lake at the points where the sediment was disturbed. The
sediment samples were labeled "JC-021-SD". The sample point corresponds to GPS file R081122B.
Each team acidified the aqueous metals samples at the end of the day and packed the samples on
ice for overnight storage. The two teams departed the site for the hotel at 20: l Spm.
Tuesday. August 12. 1997
On Tuesday, August 12, 1997, Stephanie Kozel and Doug Moore (Team I) arrived at the Johnson
Controls site at 07: 15, loaded the vans, picked up some ice and proceeded to the Otis Crews farm.
At 08: I Sam, we arrived at the Otis Crews farm, located at 2771 West Mountain Road, to collect
5
•
surface water and sediment samples along Lowery Mill Creek and its associated tributaries. Team
I was accompanied by Mark Bailey of RMT Consultants to receive split samples.
At 08:40 am, Team 1 calibrated the instruments prior to taking field sample measurements. The pH
meter was calibrated to the pH 7.0 calibration standard and the calibration was checked with the pH
4.0 standard. The turbidity of the 4.89 NTU turbidity check standard read 4.7 NTU (3.9%
deviation). The Specific Conductivity (SC) was zero calibrated to ambient air and the calibration
was checked against the 1413 uS conductivity standard (SC= 1413 uS).
At 09:00 am, Team 1 traveled to the intersection ofa small tributary with a power line right of way,
located about 700-800 feet northwest of the Crews farmhouse. From there, Team 1 inspected the
small tributary of Lowery Mill Creek downstream to the confluence with Lowery Mill Creek. The
sample point serves as a control sample on a tributary that intersects Lowery Mill Creek, between
the Johnson Controls facility and Salem Lake. In order to locate fine-grained silty sediments, the
sample point was moved downstream to the boundary with an apparent wetland area containing
obligate wetland species. The overstory species at this location included maples and alders. The
vegetative layer contained various grasses and arrowhead plants.
At 09:33 am, Stephanie Kozel (SK) collected a sediment grab sample from a sediment bar found
on the inside edge of a bend in the tributary. The sediment sample was an olive gray, fine-grained
silt exhibiting a hydrogen sulfide (rotten egg) odor. The sediment was sampled for VOC analyses
first, then composited in a clean pyrex pan for SVOC and metals samples. The sediment sample was
labeled "JC-014-SD". Due to the thick overstory, GPS readings were unable to be taken at the exact
sample location. The sample point corresponds to a point, approximately 35 feet north of the GPS
file reading C081213B. Split samples were offered and received by Mark Bailey of RMT
Consultants. Photo 7 shows Stephanie Kozel collecting a sediment sample along the inside bend of
the tributary. After collecting the sediment sample, Team 1 moved about 75 feet upstream to collect
a surface water sample at a small pool in the tributary, in order to avoid sampling water that may
contained disturbed sediments.
At 09:45 am, SK collected a surface water grab sample for VOC analyses. SK then collected
samples for BNA and metals analyses. Split samples were offered and received by Mark Bailey of
RMY-Consultants. The surface water sample was labeled "JC-014-SW". Photo 8 shows Stephanie
Kozel collecting the surface water sample JC-014-SW at the small pool in the tributary. The sample
for JC-014-SW exhibited the following water quality parameters: pH= 6.85 @21.7 ° C, S.C. =
107.0 uS @20.6 ° C, TDS = 53.7 mg/1@20.5 ° C, and Turbidity= 21.9 NTU.
At 08:55 am, Team 2 calibrated the instruments prior to taking field sample measurements. The pH
meter was calibrated to the pH 7.0 calibration standard and t!1e calibration was checked with the pH
4.0 standard. The turbidity of the 4.75 NTU turbidity check standard read 5.25 NTU (I 0%
deviation), the 45.0 NTU check standard read 48.3 NTU (7.3 % deviation), and the 543 check
standard read 552 NTU (1.6 % deviation). The Specific Conductivity (SC) was zero calibrated to
ambient air and the calibration was checked against the 1413 uS conductivity standard (SC= 1413
6
• •
uS). The Total Dissolved Solids(TDS) check standard read 706 mg/I.
At 09:30, Team 2 located the control sample on an unnamed tributary that drains to Salem Lake,
approximately 600 feet north of the Old Greensboro Road bridge. The tributary is located on the
City of Winston Salem property, and accessible from the end of Hubbard Road. At 09:40 am, Stuart
Parker ("SP") collected a sediment grab sample from the tributary for VOC analyses first, then
composited the sediment in a clean pyrex pan for SVOC and metals analyses. The sediment was a
light to medium brown, silty fine sand containing little medium to coarse-grained sand and little
clay. The sediment sample was labeled "JC-017-SD". Split samples were offered and received by
Lynn Hanna of RMT Consultants. The sediment sample location corresponds to OPS file
R081213A. Photos 11 and 12 show Stuart Parker collecting the sediment sample JC-017-SD.
Team 2 moved approximately 25 feet upstream of the sediment sample location in the tributary, in
order to avoid sampling water that may contained disturbed sediments. At I 0:00 am, Rusty Harris-
Bishop ("RHB") collected a surface water grab sample for VOC, SVOC and metals analyses. The
surface water sample was labeled "JC-017-SW". Split samples were offered and received by Lynn
Hanna of RMT Consultants. The surface water sample exhibited the following water quality
parameters: pH= 6.16@21.5 ° C, S.C. = 111.7 uS, TDS = 55.2 mg/I, and Turbidity= 6.71 NTU.
Photos 13 and 14 show Rusty Harris-Bishop collecting the surface water sample JC-017-SW.
From I 0:00 am-I I :00 am, Team I inspected Lowery Mill Creek, downstream of the confluence with
the unnamed tributary from Basin I. Over time, a depositional plain has formed near the mouth of
the unnamed tributary, causing the formation of braided channels and silt bars. The wetland in this
area appears to spread out in a fan at the mouth, making the area nearly impassable. We walked
along the boundary of this wetland to a point where the furthest downstream channel from the
wetland drains to Lowery Mill Creek. We walked about 100 feet downstream of this point along the
southeast bank of Lowery Mill Creek to a sediment bar on the inside edge of a meander in the
channel. At least two bars are located between the confluence and the sample point to provide
mixing for the surface water sample.
Lowery Mill Creek at this location is about I 0-12 feet wide and 1-2 feet deep. Mark Bailey observed
that the stream bed contains a large population of fresh water mussels. The mussels have a black
rippled shell, about 1-2 cm in width.
At 11: 12 am, SK collected a surface water grab sample from the top 12 inches of the water column
near the center of Lowery Mill Creek for VOC, SVOC and metals analyses. Split samples were
offered and received by Mark Bailey of RMT Consultants. The surface water sample was labeled
"JC-012-SW". Photo 10 shows Stephanie Kozel collecting the surface water sample JC-012-SW
from Lowery Mill Creek, downstream of the unnamed tributary from Basin I. The sample for JC-
014-SW exhibited the following water quality parameters: pH= 7.04 @23.1 ° C, S.C. = 178.7 uS
@23.6 ° C, TDS = 93.0 mg/I @23.6 ° C, and Turbidity= I 0.3 NTU. The sample point corresponds
to OPS file C08 l 2 l 5A.
7
At 11 :30 am, SK collected a sediment grab sample from the bar on the inside edge of a meander
near the southeast bank of Lowery Mill Creek. The sediment was taken from the top 4 inches. The
sediment was an olive gray, fine-grained sand with high organic content that exhibited a hydrogen
sulfide odor (rotten eggs). The sediment sample was collected for VOC analyses first, then
composited in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses. The sediment was
labeled "JC-012-SD". Split samples were offered and received by Mark Bailey ofRMT Consultants.
Photo 11 shows Stephanie Kozel collecting the sediment sample JC-0 I 2-SD, from downstream
facing northeast. The photo also demonstrates the stream characteristics of Lowery Mill Creek at
this location.
Team 2 inspected the small spring-fed tributary that drains to Salem Lake, northeast of the Clay
Ange residence at 830 Hubbard Road. At 11 :47 am, RHB collected a surface water grab sample
for VOC, SVOC and metals analyses. The surface water sample was labeled "JC-015-SW". Split
samples were offered and received by Lynn Hanna ofRMT Consultants. The surface water sample
exhibited the following water quality parameters: pH= 6.63@ 23.3 ° C, S.C. = 99.2 uS, TDS =
50.9 mg/!, and Turbidity= 30.6 NTU. Photo 15 shows Rusty Harris-Bishop collecting the surface
water sample JC-015-SW. The sample point is located about 8 feet east of GPS file R081215A.
At 12:05, RHB collected a sediment grab sample from the tributary for VOC analyses first, then
composited in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses. The sediment was a
brown to olive gray, silty clay with little organic content. The sediment sample was labeled "JC-
015-SD". Split samples were offered and received by Lynn Hanna of RMT Consultants.
At 12:05 pm, Doug Moore of Team I used a measuring wheel to measure off 332 feet of wetland
frontage bordering the unnamed tributary from Basin I. The wetland frontage was determined from
a wooden stake that denotes the beginning boundary of the wetland, as previously confirmed by John
Thomas, wetlands expert with the Army Corps of Engineers. This represents approximately 664
feet of total frontage, or greater than 0.1 miles of wetland frontage for HRS scoring purposes.
At 12:25 pm, SK collected a surface water grab sample from the top 6 inches of the water column
near the center of the unnamed tributary from Basin I for VOC, SVOC and metals analyses. Split
samples were offered and received by Mark Bailey of RMT Consultants. The surface water sample
was labeled "JC-006-SW". Photo 12 shows Stephanie Kozel collecting the surface water sample
JC-006-SW from a point 332 feet into the first wetland on the unnamed tributary from Basin I. The
sample for JC-006-SW exhibited the following water quality parameters: pH= 6.53 @ 25.0 ° C,
S.C. = 99.2 uS @23.9 ° C, TDS = 46.6 mg/! @24.1 ° C, and Turbidity= 11.7 NTU. The sample
point corresponds to GPS file C081216A. At 12:30 pm, SK collected a duplicate surface water grab
sample at the same location as JC-006-SW for VOC, SVOC and metals analyses. Split samples were
offered and received by Mark Bailey of RMT Consultants. The surface water sample was labeled
"JC-I 06-SW". Note that because of the concern over cross contaminating the sample with disturbed
sediments, the sample was purposefully collected in the center of a small current created by an
constriction in the channel, in order to avoid collecting sediment laden water. The turbidity
measurement was then taken immediately following collection of the surface water and duplicate
8
• •
surface water sample, as a worst case scenario.
At 13 :00 pm, SK collected a sediment grab sample from the unnamed tributary from Basin I. The
sediment was collected at the same location as JC-006-SW. The sediment was sampled for VOC
analyses first, then composited in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses.
The sediment was an olive gray, fine-grained clay with high organic content exhibiting a hydrogen
sulfide odor (rotten eggs). The sediment samples were labeled "JC-006-SD". Split samples were
offered and received by Mark Bailey of RMT Consultants.
At 13:30 pm, Teams I and 2 broke for lunch. We arrived back at the site to resume sampling at
15:00 pm.
Team 2 returned to Clay Ange residence at 830 Hubbard Road to collect another control sample on
an unnamed tributary that discharges to the northwest bank of Salem Lake. The tributary is located
about 250 feet west of the Ange residence.
At 15:35 pm, RHB collected a sediment sample from the unnamed tributary west of the Ange
residence. The sediment was a brown, silty clay containing high organic content. The sediment was
sampled for VOC analyses first, then composited in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and
metals analyses. The sediment sample was labeled "JC-016-SD". The sample point corresponds to
GPS file R081219B. Split samples were offered and received by Lynn Hanna of RMT Consultants.
Photos 16 and 17 show Rusty Harris-Bishop collecting the sediment sample JC-016-SD. The
surface water sample originally planned for this location was abandoned, since there was no flow
in the unnamed tributary at that time.
From 1500-16: 15 pm, Team I surveyed two possible access points to collect surface water and
sediment samples from Lowery Mill Creek near the confluence with Martin Mill Creek. The first,
a small dirt road, located northeast of the facility off Walkerton-Guthrie Road, was inaccessible due
to fallen trees blocking the road. The second, a Duke Power Company right-of-way off Lamond
Drive, was inaccessible due to impassable wetlands at the confluence of Martin Mill and Lowery
Mill Creeks. Finally, an access point was identified on the north bank of Lowery Mill Creek at the
end of Rickard Road. Lowery Mill Creek is about IO feet wide and I foot deep on average. It
contains numerous meanders with associated sedimentary bars and riffles in the streambed.
At 16:30 pm, Stephanie Kozel collected a downstream sediment sample from Lowery Mill Creek,
about 300 feet below the discharge point of an unnamed tributary from Basins 2 and 3 to Lowery
Mill Creek. The sample was collected from a sedimentary bar deposited on the inside edge of a
small meander on the north bank. The sediment was sampled for VOC analyses first, then
composited in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses. The sediment was
olive gray, fine silt with fine sand and moderate organic content. 'The sediment sample was labeled
"JC-009-SD". Split samples were offered and received by Mark Bailey ofRMT Consultants. The
sediment sample corresponds to GPS file C081220A. Photo 13 shows Stephanie Kozel collecting
sediment sample JC-009-SD.
9
• •
At 16:45 pm, SK collected a downstream surface water grab sample from Lowery Mill Creek about
270 feet below the discharge point of an unnamed tributary from Basins 2 and 3 to Lowery Mill
Creek. At least two sedimentary bars and a riffle are located between the discharge point and the
sample point to provide mixing for the surface water sample. The sample was collected from the
top 6 inches of the water column in a current created below a riffle, about 3 feet from the south bank
of Lowery Mill Creek. The surface water was sampled for VOC, SVOC and metals analyses. The
surface water sample was labeled "JC-009-SW". Split samples were offered and received by Mark
Bailey of RMT Consultants. The sample for JC-009-SW exhibited the following water quality
parameters: pH= 7. 13 @25.1 ° C, S.C. = 94.5 uS @25.7 ° C, TDS = 49.9 mg/I @25.4 ° C, and
Turbidity= 11.0 NTU.
Team 2 inspected a small tributary that drains to Lowery Mill Creek, about 100 feet southwest of
the James Grace residence, 500 Gaither Road. At 16:35 pm, Rusty Harris-Bishop ("RHB") sampled
surface water from the tributary for VOC, SVOC and metals analyses. The surface water sample
was labeled "JC-013-SW". Split samples were offered and received by Lynn Hanna of RMT
Consultants. The surface water grab sample JC-013-SW exhibited the following water quality
parameters: pH= 7.43 @26.3 ° C, S.C. = 106.7 uS, TDS = 53.9 mg/I, and Turbidity= 1.78 NTU.
The sample point corresponds to GPS file R08 l 220A. Photos 18 shows Rusty Harris-Bishop
collecting surface water sample JC-013-SW. Photo 19 shows the unnamed tributary stream
characteristics.
At 16:50 pm, Stuart Parker ("SP") sampled sediment from the tributary for VOC analyses first, then
composited in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses. The sediment was
medium to dark brown with some olive gray, fine-grained clayey silt. The sediment sample was
labeled "JC-013-SD". Split samples were offered and received by Lynn Hanna ofRMT Consultants.
Photo 20 shows Stuart Parker collecting sediment sample JC-013-SD. Photo 21 shows the color
and texture of the sediment sample at JC-013-SD, following compositing in the pyrex pan.
Team 1 proceeded upstream on Lowery Mill Creek to the point where the unnamed tributary from
Basins 2 and 3 discharges to Lowery Mill Creek. Team 1 inspected the tributary upstream to the
Duke Power Company right of way to confirm the location. The sample point was chosen at a small
pool found in a bend in the channel, about 75 feet upstream of the confluence with Lowery Mill
Creek. The unnamed tributary is a small stream about 1-2 feet wide and about 6 inches deep on
average. The stream has a minimal flow and the stream bed contains red stained deposits, apparently
from iron oxide bacteria.
At 17:26 pm, SK sampled the surface water from the unnamed tributary for VOC, SVOC and
metals analyses. The surface water grab sample was labeled "JC-007-SW". A duplicate surface
water grab sample was also collected at this location for VOC, SVOC and metals analyses. The
duplicate surface water sample was labeled "JC-107-SW". Splits of both sets of surface water
samples were offered and received by Mark Bailey of RMT Consultants. The surface water grab
sample for JC-007-SW and JC-107-SW exhibited the following water quality parameters: pH= 6.52
@24.3 ° C, S.C. = 120.6 uS @23.7 ° C, TDS = 60.9 mg/I @23.3 ° C, and Turbidity= 27.9 NTU.
10
• •
Photos 14 and 15 show the location and stream characteristics of the unnamed tributary at the sample
point for JC-007-SW and JC-I 07-SW.
At 17:55 pm, SK sampled sediments from the unnamed tributary at the same location as JC-007-SW
for VOC analyses first, then composited in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals
analyses. The sediment was a olive gray, fine-grained silty sediment that exhibited no odors or
sheen. The sediment sample was labeled" JC-007-SD". Split samples were offered and received
by Mark Bailey of RMT Consultants. The sample point corresponds to GPS file C081221 A.
Team 2 inspected a small tributary that drains to the north side of Lowery Mill Creek, approximately
400 feet south of the Robert Cranfill residence, 4224 Robertson Drive. At 18:25 pm, Rusty Harris-
Bishop ("RHB") sampled surface water from the tributary for VOC, SVOC and metals analyses.
The surface water sample was labeled "JC-011-SW". Split samples were offered and received by
Lynn Hanna of RMT Consultants. The surface water grab sample JC-011-SW exhibited the
following water quality parameters: pH= 7.22 @23.1 ° C, S.C. = 119.6 uS, TDS = 59.6 mg/I, and
Turbidity= 6.52 NTU. The sample point corresponds to GPS file R081222A.
At 18:45 pm, RHB sampled sediment from the san1e location as JC-0 I I-SW, for VOC analyses first,
then composited in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses. The sediment
was a brown to olive gray, fine-grained sandy silt, with little medium to coarse-grained sand and
little clay. The sediment exhibited no odors or sheen. The sediment sample was labeled "JC-011-
SD". Split samples were offered and received by Lynn Hanna of RMT Consultants.
Team I inspected Lowery Mill Creek upstream to the point where Lowery Mill Creek and Martin
Mill Creek converge. At a point about 150 feet downstream of the convergence, a fallen tree
obstructed the water flow, carving out a medium sized pool about 3 feet in diameter immediately
downstream of the obstruction. Several small sedimentary bars built up a few feet downstream of
the pool. At least two sedimentary bars and the obstruction were present between the convergence
and the pool to promote mixing of the two stream columns.
At 18:45 pm, SK collected a sediment sample from the inside edge of a meander in Lowery Mill
Creek, below the pool, and about 150 feet downstream of the convergence. The sediment is an olive
gray, fine silt containing fine sand and sand-size mica flakes. The sediment also contained moderate
to high organic content, which exhibited a odor of decaying vegetation. The sediments were
sampled for VOC analyses first, then composited in a clean pyrex pan for SVOC and metals
analyses. The sediment samples were labeled "JC-008-SD". A split sample was also collected at
the same time to test sample handling variability. The split sample was labeled "JC-I 08-SD". Splits
of both sets of samples were offered and received by Mark Bailey ofRMT Consultants. The sample
point corresponds to GPS file C08 I 223A.
At 19:25 pm, Doug Moore sampled surface water from the pool, immediately below the fallen tree
obstruction in Lowery Mill Creek, for VOC, SVOC and metals analyses. Triple volumes of surface
water from Lowery Mill Creek were collected at this location; one set to represent background
11
• •
conditions and the other two sets to be used for preparation of the matrix spike and matrix spike
duplicate by the Contract Laboratory. The background surface water samples were labeled "JC-008-
SW". The two MS/MSD. samples were labeled "JC-I 08-SW". Split samples were offered and
received by Mark Bailey ofRMT Consultants. The surface water grab sample for JC-008-SW and
JC-I 08-SW exhibited the following water quality parameters: pH = 6.43 @ 25.1 ° C, S.C. = 118.3
uS @24.9 ° C, TDS = 56.1 mg/I @26.9 ° C, and Turbidity= 9.60 NTU. (Note: During sample
labeling, Jeanette Stanley assigned a single field identification number of "JC-008-SW" to all three
samples, since a second CLP tracking number was not necessary for the laboratory MS/MSD
samples.)
At 20:00, Teams I and 2 arrived back at the command post to prepare the samples, secure the
samples in coolers and prepare the proper documentation and decontaminate equipment for the days
work. We departed the site around 21 :00 pm.
Wednesday, August 13, 1997
At 07: 15 am, Teams I and 2 arrived at the command post and organized for the day. RMT
Consultants arrived at the site at 07:45 am. Chris Fisher from Johnson Controls arrived at the
command post to observe the sampling onsite.
At 08: 15 am, Team I calibrated the field instruments prior to taking field sample measurements.
The pH meter was calibrated to the pH 7.0 calibration standard and the calibration was checked with
the pH 4.0 standard. The turbidity of the 4.89 NTU turbidity check standard read 4.7 NTU (3.9%
deviation). The Specific Conductivity (SC) was zero calibrated to ambient air and the calibration
was checked against the 1413 uS conductivity standard (SC= 1410 uS). The TDS meter was also
zero calibrated to ambient air and the calibration was checked against the 706 mg/I check standard
(TDS = 708 mg/I).
At 08:40 am, Team I, accompanied by Mark Bailey of RMT Consultants and Chris Fisher of
Johnson Controls, inspected the unnamed tributary from Basin I downstream to a point where a
small spring discharges to the unnamed tributary, approximately 900 feet downstream of Basin I.
Since there was a low flow discharge to the unnamed tributary, Stephanie Kozel ("SK") excavated
a small basin about 2 feet in diameter by 15 inches deep to trap water from the spring before it
discharges to the tributary. The water in the basin was cloudy, so it was decided to allow the water
ample time to settle before collecting the surface water sample at this location. The group proceeded
upstream to inspect the unnamed tributary immediately below Basin I.
From 09:00 - I 0:00 am, the group inspected the unnamed tributary beginning at the discharge pipe
from Basin I and extending downstream about 550 feet to the confluence with the main channel on
the unnamed tributary. The unnamed tributary is about 1.5 feet wide and 3 inches deep on average.
A small seep was observed discharging a trickle of water to the tributary at a point about 250 feet
downstream of the discharge pipe from Basin I . The seep oozes from the wall along the south bank
of the tributary and travels over wet vegetated soil for about 20 feet to the unnamed tributary. The
12
• •
group inspected the upland areas above the seep and found no alternate sources that could
contaminate the seep. Stephanie Kozel was instructed to dig a small basin in the stream bed of the
tributary at a point about 8 feet below where the seep and the tributary merge, in order to collect a
surface water sample.
At 10:05 am, SK sampled surface water from a small basin constructed in the stream bed of the
unnamed tributary, approximately 250 feet downstream of the discharge pipe from Basin 1, for
VOC, SVOC and metals analyses. The surface water grab sample was labeled "JC-004-SW". Split
samples were offered and received by Mark Bailey of RMT Consultants. The sample point
corresponds to GPS file C08 ! 3 l 4A. The surface water grab sample at sample JC-004-SW exhibited
the following water quality parameters: pH= 6.54 @21.9 ° C, S.C. = 156.1 uS @22.6 ° C, TDS
= 78.8 mg/I @ 22.5 ° C, and Turbidity = 8.0 NTU. Photo 17 shows Stephanie Kozel sampling
surface water from the small basin at JC-004-SW.
Note that because of the concern over cross contaminating the sample with disturbed sediments,
the sample was purposefully collected in the current with the neck of the bottle facing upstream
above the small sampling basin, in order to avoid collecting sediment laden water. The water
quality measurements were taken immediately following collection of the surface water samples,
as a worst case scenario.
At 10:30 am, SK sampled sediment from the unnamed tributary at the point where the seep
discharges to the unnamed tributary, about 250 feet downstream of the discharge pipe from Basin
I. The sediment sample was an olive gray, fine-grained sand with silt, that contained a high organic
content exhibiting a hydrogen sulfide odor (rotten eggs). The sediment was sampled for VOC
analyses first, then composited in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses.
The sediment sample was labeled "JC-004-SD". Split samples were offered and received by Mark
Bailey ofRMT Consultants. Photo 18 shows Stephanie Kozel sampling sediments at JC-004-SD.
During the earlier inspection, it was observed that the tributary from Basin 1 merges with the main
channel of the unnamed tributary at a point about 550 feet downstream (southwest) of basin 1. The
group inspected the main channel upstream for about I 00 feet and observed a ravine and a small
tributary that merge into the main channel about 80 feet upstream of the confluence. Since these
runoff pathways could carry contaminants from upland offsite areas into the stream, it was decided
to locate a surface water and sediment background sample within about 80 feet upstream of the
confluence with the tributary from Basin I. A suitable background sample point was identified at
a small pool immediately below an constriction in the stream channel, about 40 feet upstream of the
confluence.
At l l :00 am, SK sampled surface water from the small pool for VOC, SVOC and metals analyses.
The surface water sample will serve as the background sample for the unnamed tributaries that direct
and discharge site runoff to Lowery Mill Creek. The surface water sample was labeled "JC-001-
SW". Split samples were offered and received by Mark Bailey ofRMT Consultants. The surface
water grab sample for JC-001-SW exhibited the following water quality parameters: pH= 6.61@
13
•
22.2 ° C, S.C. = 98.0 uS @20.5 ° C, TDS = 49.4 mg/I @20.5 ° C, and Turbidity= 5.1 NTU. The
surface water parameters were tested following collection of the surface water samples.
The surface water sample point corresponds to OPS file C08 l 3 l 5A.
Since the slope of the unnamed tributary creates a high energy environment, the sediments found in
the unnamed tributary at the background location were typically coarse-grained sand with little to
no organic content. The type of coarse-grained sandy sediment would not be representative of the
organic rich, fine grained sediments encountered in the wetland samples downstream in the
unnamed tributary near Lowery Mill Creek. A closer inspection of the stream bed identified four
small depositional areas that contained dark colored, fine-grained sediments within a 20 foot section
of the unnamed tributary at the background location, and it was decided to composite the sediments
from the four depositional areas to represent the background in the unnamed tributary.
At 11 :30 am, SK sampled sediments from 4 depositional areas within a 20 foot section of the
unnamed tributary, downstream of the small pool. The sediment sample, though technically a
composite, was collected to be as representative as possible of the type of sediment previously
collected from the unnamed tributary. The sediment was a dark brown, fine sand with silt,
containing a moderate organic content with no odors or sheen. The sediment was sampled for VOC
analyses first, then composited in a clean pyrex pan for SVOC and metals analyses. The sediment
samples were labeled "JC-001-SD". Split samples were offered and received by Mark Bailey of
RMT Consultants.
At 08: 15 am, Team 2 calibrated the field instruments prior to taking field sample measurements.
The pH meter was calibrated to the pH 7.0 calibration standard and the calibration was checked with
the pH 4.0 standard. The turbidity of the 4.75 NTU turbidity check standard read 5.12 NTU (7.8 %
deviation), the 45.0 NTU turbidity check standard read 48.0 NTU (6.7 % deviation), and the 543
NTU check standard read 553 NTU (1.8 % deviation). The Specific Conductivity (SC) was zero
calibrated to ambient air and the calibration was checked against the 1413 uS conductivity standard
(SC=1413 uS). The TDS meter was also zero calibrated to ambient air and the calibration was
checked against the 706 mg/I check standard (TDS = 706 mg/I).
At 08:30 am, Team 2 inspected a small tributary that drains to the north bank of Lowery Mill Creek,
about 600 feet downstream of the unnamed tributary from Basins 2 and 3. Team 2 proceeded
upstream about 150 feet on the tributary to located a suitable sample point. The tributary was about
1-2 feet across and 6 inches deep on average. There was very low flow discharging from the stream,
but enough water in a pooled section of the tributary to collect surface water samples.
At 09:25 am, Rusty Harris-Bishop ("RHB") sampled sediment from the pooled section of the
unnamed tributary, about 150 feet upstream of the mouth, for VOC analyses first. The sediment
sampl_e was then composited in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses. The
sediment was a brown, fine to medium-grained sand with little silt, that did not exhibit any odors
or sheen. The sediment sample was labeled "JC-010-SD". Split samples were offered and received
by Lynn Hanna of RMT Consultants. The sediment sample location corresponds to OPS file
14
•
R081313B.
At 09:40 am, RHB sampled surface water from the pooled section of the unnamed tributary for
VOC, SVOC and metals analyses. The surface water sample was labeled "JC-010-SW". Split
samples were offered and received by Lynn Hanna of RMT Consultants. The surface water grab
sample for JC-001-SW exhibited the following water quality parameters: pH= 6.01 @20.5 ° C,
S.C. = 73.0 uS, TDS = 36.6 mg/I, and Turbidity = 4.02 NTU. Photos 22 through 24 show the
approximate sample location on the unnamed tributary for JC-010-SW and JC-010-SD.
At 11 :00 am, Team 2 inspected the unnamed tributaries below Basins 2 and 3. There was no
apparent flow exiting basin 2 at this time. Likewise, few deposits of fine-grained silt were found in
the streambed. At 11 :15 am, Stuart Parker ("SP") sampled sediment from a relatively flat segment
of the unnamed tributary stream bed for VOC analyses first, then composited sediment in a clean
pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses. The sediment was a medium brown,
micaceous, silty fine to medium-grained sand, which was mottled red and olive green. The sediment
sample was labeled "JC-003-SD". Split samples were offered and received by Lynn Hanna ofRMT
Consultants. The sediment sample location corresponds to GPS file R08 l 3 l 5A. Since there was
no apparent flow, Team 2 did not sample surface water from the unnamed tributary below Basin 2.
Photo I shows Stuart Parker collecting the sediment sample JC-003-SD. Photos 2 and 3 show the
drainage pathway below Basin 2. Photo 4 shows Stuart Parker compositing the sediment sample JC-
003-SD.
Team 2 inspected the splash pad above basin 2. The splash pad consists of a small, unlined basin
about 2-3 feet in diameter, excavated directly below a corrugated drainage pipe immediately
upgradient of basin 2. The basin is very channelized and does not contain much silt or sediment.
Team· 2 noticed a strong odor which originated near the drainage pipe, that they described as a
chemical fertilizer or exhaust type odor.
At 11 :50 am, SP sampled soil in the overland runoff immediately below the splash pad for VOC
analyses first, then composited soil in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses.
The soil was a reddish brown, fine to medium-grained, silty sand with some darker organic seams.
The soil sample was labeled "JC-013-SL". Split samples were offered and received by Lynn Hanna
of RMT Consultants. The sample location corresponds to GPS file R08 l 3 l 6A. Photo 5 shows the
broken corrugated drainage pipe and splash pad. Photo 6 shows the same location but facing
downgradient of the splash pad. Photo 7 shows Stuart Parker sampling the soil directly below the
splash pad for JC-013-SL.
Team I proceeded back to the small spring located on the unnamed tributary from Basin I to collect
a surface water and sediment sample from the previously excavated sample basin. At 12:05 pm,
Stephanie Kozel ("SK") sampled the surface water from the basin for VOC, SVOC and metals
analyses. The surface water grab sample was labeled "JC-005-SW". Split samples were offered and
received by Mark Bailey of RMT Consultants. Photo 20 shows Stephanie Kozel sampling the small
excavated basin at the spring. Note that because of the concern over cross contaminating the
15
•
sample with disturbed sediments, the sample was purposefully collected in the trickling current
with the neck of the bottle facing upstream above the small sampling basin, in order to avoid
collecting sediment laden water. The turbidity measurement was then taken immediately following
collection of the surface water samples, as a worst case scenario. The sample parameters for JC-
005-SW were as follows: pH= 6.78 @ 23.1 ° C, S.C. = 79.5 uS @ 24.3 ° C, TDS = 41.6 mg/1@
23.9 ° C, and Turbidity= 5.1 NTU. The sample location corresponds to GPS file C081312A.
At 12:35 pm, SK sampled the sediment from the lower end of the small spring, upstream of the
excavated basin and about IO feet upstream of the confluence with the unnamed tributary from
Basin I. SK sampled the sediment for VOC analyses first, then composited the sediment in a clean
pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses. The sediment sample was an olive gray,
medium to fine-grained sand with silt mix, having a moderate organic content that exhibited a very
slight organic decay odor. The sediment sample was labeled "JC-005-SD": Split samples were
offered and received by Mark Bailey ofRMT Consultants. The sediment profile consisted of a 1-2
inch layer of coarse and medium-grained sand, on top of a clay, silt and fine to medium-grained sand
mix. The sediment sample was collected from the clay, silt and sand sub-layer at 1-4 inches deep.
After collecting JC-005-SW/SD, Team I broke for lunch.
Team 2 scouted the unnamed tributary below Basin 3. No surface water flow was observed in the
unnamed tributary below Basin 3, therefore, surface water grab sample JC-002-SW was not taken
at this time. Photo 8 shows the discharge pipe below Basin 3. At 12:30 pm, SP sampled sediments
from the unnamed tributary below Basin 3 for VOC analyses, then composited the sediments in a
clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses. The sediment sample was collected
about 300 feet downgradient of the discharge pipe from Basin 3. The sediment sample was a
medium to dark brown, fine to medium-grained sand with silt and some clays. The sediment sample
was labeled "JC-002-SD". Split samples were. offered and received by Lynn Hanna of RMT
Consultants. The sample location corresponds to GPS file R08 l 316B. Photo 9 shows Stuart Parker
sampling sediments in the unnamed tributary below Basin 3 for JC-002-SD.
After collecting JC-002-SD, Team 2 broke for lunch.
At 14:00 pm, Teams I and 2 arrived back at the site, and briefed about afternoon's sampling
locations. Team 2 indicated that there was no surface water flow below Basin 2 and little flow below
Basin 3. Doug Moore decided to recon sample points with Team 2. However, from 14:20-14:30
pm, a short rainstorm occurred at the site, which carried runoff from the site to the Basins. At 14:55
pm, Doug Moore reconned and observed a small trickle discharging from the discharge pipe of Basin
3 to the unnamed tributary that flowed downstream and emptied to a small pool in the streambed,
about 250 feet below the discharge pipe. After consulting with Chris Fisher and Mark Bailey, Doug
Moore instructed Team 2 to collect a sample for turbidity measurements. The sample was taken at
a small trickle that flowed over a boulder and emptied to the pool. The turbidity at this point read
130 NTU. Since turbidity was higher than other tributary samples, it may be caused by the brief
storm event, which would not be a indicator of typical static conditions. Doug Moore requested that
16
•
Team 2 wait for turbidity to drop before collecting surface water sample at the pool.
Team 2 proceeded upgradient of Basin 3 to collect sample below the splash pad. Since no splash
pad was found above Basin 3, Doug Moore instructed Team 2 to collect soil sample immediately
below a culvert in the runoff pathway that drained to Basin 3 at the northwest corner of the facility.
Team I proceeded upgradient of Basin I to sample soil in the overland runoff path between the
splash pad and Basin I. At 15:45 pm, SK sampled surface soil in the overland runoff pathway where
an abrupt change in slope allows soil deposition, approximately 30 feet upgradient of Basin I. The
soil was sampled for VOC analyses first, then the soil was composited in a clean pyrex pan and
sampled for SVOC and metals analyses. The soil was a reddish brown, coarse-grained sand with
some fines and little organic content. The soil samples were labeled "JC-014-SL". Split samples
were offered and received by Mark Bailey of RMT Consultants. The sample location corresponds
to a point about 28 feet Northeast of GPS file C08 I 3 I 9A. Photo 21 shows Stephanie Kozel
collecting soil sample JC-014-SL, in the overland runoff pathway above Basin I.
At 16:25 pm, SK sampled surface soil in the overland runoff pathway about 25 feet downgradient
of the splash pad at the north end of the facility. The soil was collected from two small depositional
bars within a five foot section of the runoff ditch. The soil samples were light brown with orange
tint, fine-grained silty sand that contained fine to medium-grained sand. The soil sample was labeled
"JC-01 I-SL". Split samples were offered and received by Mark Bailey ofRMT Consultants. The
sample location corresponds to GPS file C08 l 320A. Photo 22 shows the approximate location of
soil sample JC-01 I-SL, relative to the splash pad and culvert at the north end of the facility.
Team 2 decided to sample surface background soil in a wooded area west of the facility. At 17:15
pm, Stuart Parker ("SP") sampled surface soil from the woods, about 500 feet west of the Basin 2,
for VOC analyses first. The soil was then composited in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC
and metals analyses. The soil was sampled at a depth of 1-4 inches deep. The soil sample was a
medium brown, fine to medium-grained sandy silt. A duplicate soil sample was collected from the
same pyrex pan to test sample handling variability. The soil sample was labeled "JC-001-SL" and
the duplicate soil sample was labeled "JC-IOI-SL". Split samples were offered and received by
Lynn Hanna of RMT Consultants. The sample location corresponds to GPS file R08 l 312B. Photos
IO and 11 show the background soil sample location and sample color for JC-00 I-SL and JC-IO I-
SL.
Team I proceeded to the Acid Storage and Mixing Area near the north end of the facility to collect
surface soil samples for potential source samples. At 17: IO pm, Doug Moore collected GPS file
C081321A at a catch basin that receives runoff from the acid storage area and directs it underground
to a splash pad discharge point north of the facility. Since no sediments were identified within the
catch basin, Doug Moore moved the sample point for JC-0 I 0-SL to a 5 x 7 foot bare soil area near
the northwest corner of the acid storage building. It was observed that the foundation of the building
was composed of four courses of cinderblock framed on top with an aluminum sided envelope. The
bare soil appeared to have been used for storage, as evidenced by the pallet marks on top of the soil.
17
•
The foundation was painted with white paint that appeared to be flaking off, exposing a blue
undercoating. Chris Fisher was not certain when the building was constructed, so it could not be
determined iflead-based paint was applied,to the foundation.
At 17:20 pm, SK sampled surficial soil from the 5 x 7 foot bare area at the NW corner of the Acid
Storage Area. The soil sample was a light brown, well-graded, fine-grained clayey sand that
exhibited no odors. The soil was sampled for VOC analyses first, then the soil was composited in
a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses. The soil sample was labeled "JC-
010-SL". Split samples were offered and received by Mark Bailey ofRMT Consultants. The sample
location corresponds to GPS file C08 l 32 l B. Photo 23 shows Stephanie Kozel sampling the soil for
JC-010-SL at the NW corner of the Acid Storage Building. Due to the concern over cross-
contaminating the sample with lead based paint chips, the soil was sampled to avoid collecting any
paint chips.
At 17:45 pm, SK sampled surface soil along a small overland runoff pathway, approximately 15 feet
north of the acid mixing building. The air at this location exhibited strong sulfur odors and a slight
burning sensation in the throat. Chris Fisher stated that the odors were hydrogen gas and sulfur
emissions vented to the ambient air by a series of large fans at the battery formation area, to the
immediate west of the sample point. He also stated that the small tickle of water observed in the
runoff pathway originated with water discharged from a Vitron equipment cooling tower west of the
sample point. The soil was sampled for VOC analyses first, then the soil was composited in a clean
pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses. The soil was a light brown, clay with fine
silt. The soil sample was labeled "JC-004-SL". Split samples were offered and received by Mark
Bailey of RMT Consultants. The sample location corresponds to GPS file C08132 IC. Photo 24
shows Stephanie Kozel sampling surface soil from the overland rw10ffpath north of the acid mixing
building. The cooling tower and battery formation area vents are visible in the upper right hand
corner.
At 17:56 pm, Rusty Harris-Bishop ("RHB") of Team 2 sampled surface soil within the top 3 inches
in the overland runoff pathway leading from the site to Basin 3, about 8-10 feet downgradient ofa
culvert near the northwest corner of the main facility. RHB sampled soil for VOC analyses first,
then composited the soil in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses. The
sample was located in an area where runoff water was constricted by a pileup of swept vegetation
that allowed sediment deposition. The soil was a red to brown, silty clay with little fine to medium-
grained sand. The soil samples were labeled "JC-012-SL". Split samples were offered and received
by Lynn Hanna of RMT Consultants. The sample location corresponds to GPS file R081322A.
Photo 12 shows Rusty Harris-Bishop sampling soil at JC-012-SL.
At 18:00 pm, SK collected a 2-point composite surface soil sample to be used for JC-002-SL. After
Doug Moore realized the sample point was composited, he instructed Stephanie to discard the
sample, since it was not intended to be a composite. After a brief equipment count, it was
determined that there would not be enough clean scoops to allow for collection of all the onsite soil
samples.
18
•
At 18:30 pm, Stephanie Kozel sampled surface soil in a small drainage feature below the acid
transfer line, about 20 feet east of the acid mixing building. The soil was sampled for VOC analyses
first, then the soil was composited in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses.
The soil was a light brown, medium-grained sand with some fines. The soil sample was labeled "JC-
003-SL". Split samples were offered and received by Mark Bailey of RMT Consultants. The soil
sample location corresponds to GPS file C08 l 322A. Due to camera problems, no additional photos
were able to be taken of the rest of the sampling trip for Team I.
At 19:00 pm, SK sampled soil at the head of a drainage culvert near the northeast corner of the acid
storage building. The soil was a reddish brown, fine sand and silt with clumps of clay mixed in the
matrix. The soil was dry and crumbly, with no characteristic odors. The soil was sample for VOC
analyses first, then the soil was composited in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals
analyses. The soil samples were labeled "JC-005-SL". Split samples were offered and received by
Mark Bailey ofRMT Consultants. The soil sample location corresponds to GPS file C081323A.
At 18:58 pm, Team 2 arrived at the lead oxide area. Doug Moore directed them to collect soil
samples at an area of stressed vegetation along a drainage ditch near Bay #15. At 19:00 pm, RHB
sampled surface soil within the top 3 inches in the small drainage ditch near Bay #15. The soil was
a stiff, dark brown, silty clay with mud cracks on the surface. The soil was sampled for VOC first,
then the soil was composited in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses. The
soil samples were labeled ".JC-006-SL". The sample location corresponds to GPS file R081323A.
Split samples were offered and received by Lynn Hanna of RMT Consultants. Photo 13 shows
Rusty Harris-Bishop and Lynn Hanna sampling soil in the drainage ditch near Bay #15. Photo 14
shows the color and texture of soil at the sample point for JC-006-SL in the stressed vegetation area.
Doug Moore verified that there was not enough equipment to collect sample JC-002-SL and decided
to drop the sample point from the sampling plan. As it was starting to get dark, Doug Moore
requested that Team 2 depart the lead oxide area to collect a downstream surface water sample
below Basin 3. Since over 5 hours had past since the brief rainstorm earlier in the afternoon, Doug
Moore instructed Team 2 to collect the surface water sample, regardless of the turbidity readings.
Doug Moore also requested that Jeanette Stanley prepare a field blank at the same location as sample
JC-004-SL. At 19:45 pm, Jeanette Stanley prepared a field blank by decanting deionized water
from one clean metals bottle into another clean metals bottle at the soil sample location JC-004-SL.
The sample was preserved with 40 drops of50 % nitric acid. The sample was labeled "JC-001-FB".
A split sample was prepared for Mark Bailey of RMT Consultants by the same method using their
pre-acidified metals bottle.
At 19:40 pm, Team 2 arrived at the downstream sampling point below Basin 3. At 19:45 pm, RHB
sampled surface water from a small trickle that flowed over a boulder and emptied to a pool (see
notes on sample point on page 16, at 14:00 pm), for VOC, SVOC and metals analyses. The grab
sample was labeled "JC-002-SW". Split samples were offered and received by Lynn Hanna ofRMT
Consultants. The surface water quality parameters for JC-003-SW were as follows: pH= 6.2 @
19
•
23.4 ° C, S.C. = 83.0 uS, TDS = 41.6 mg/I, and Turbidity= 52.7 NTU. Photo 15 shows Rusty
Harris-Bishop collecting surface water sample JC-002-SW in the small pool, downstream of the
discharge pipe from Basin 3.
At 20: IO pm, Team 2 inspected the surface water pathway below Basin 2 and found no discharge
or flow in the streambed. Therefore, the surface water grab sample JC-003-SW was dropped from
the sampling plan. Photo I 6 shows the condition of the stream bed below Basin 3. Team 2
mobilized back to collect onsite source samples.
At 19:40 pm, Doug Moore, Mark Bailey and Chris Fisher drove to the Henry Moore residence,
located at 2635 West Mountain Road, approximately 600 feet southeast of the Johnson Controls
facility. Mr. Moore granted verbal permission to collect a drinking water well sample from a tap
located on the northeast side of his house. We began purging the well at 19:50 pm. Mr. Moore
indicated that the well was a small diameter well that was constructed about 25-30 years ago (around
1955-56), by the former homeowner, whom he believes was a Mr. Anderson. Mr. Moore indicated
that the wellhead was not visible from the surface. No additional information was available about
the well construction.
At 20: 15 pm, Doug Moore sampled drinking water from the Henry Moore residential well for VOC,
SVOC and metals analyses. The metals sample was field preserved using 40 drops of 50 % nitric
acid. The well sample was labeled "JC-001-PW". Split samples were offered and received by Mark
Bailey of RMT Consultants. Since the pH/Conductivity/TDS and turbidity meters were located in
the other van, no field measurements were immediately available. After consulting with Mr. Bailey
and Mr. Fisher, Doug Moore decided to collect a sample to run parameters tests on, after returning
to the command post. The sample parameters for JC-00 I-PW, tested at 21 :20 pm, were as follows:
pH= 6.02 @ 19.9 ° C, S.C. = 57.1 uS @ I 8.8 ° C, TDS = 28.0 mg/I @ 19.9 ° C, and Turbidity=
0.4 NTU.
At 20:30 pm, Doug Moore, Mark Bailey and Chris Fisher arrived at the Otis Crews residence at
2771 West Mountain Road to collect a background drinking water well sample. The Crews residence
is located about 2500 feet southwest of the Johnson Controls facility. At 20:45 pm, we began
purging the Crews residential well. Mr. Crews stated that the well is about 6 inches in diameter,
about I 00 feet deep with the groundwater table at about 50 feet.
At 21 :00 pm, Doug Moore sampled drinking water from the Otis crews residential well for VOC,
SVOC and metals analyses. The metals sample was field preserved using 40 drops of 50 % nitric
acid. The well sample was labeled "JC-002-PW". Split samples were offered and received by Mark
Bailey ofRMT Consultants. Since the pH/Conductivity/TDS and turbidity meters were located in
the other van, no field measurements were immediately available. After consulting with Mr. Bailey
and Mr. Fisher, Doug Moore decided to collect a sample to run parameters tests on, after returning
to the command post. The sample parameters for JC-001-PW, tested at 21:20 pm, were as follows:
pH= 6.44 @ 16.5 ° C, S.C. = 170.1 uS @ 18.6 ° C, TDS = 84.0 mg/I @ I 8. 7 ° C, and Turbidity =
0.8 NTU.
20
•
At 21 :15 pm, Doug Moore instructed Jeanette Stanley to prepare a post-preservative metals blank
at the command post. At 21 :20 pm, Jeanette Stanley prepared a post-preservative metals blank by
acidifying deionized water carried in the field in a large plastic carboy, with 40 drops of 50 % nitric
acid. The sample was labeled "JC-002-PB". Split samples were prepared for Mark Bailey ofRMT
Consultants by the same method using their pre-acidified metals bottle.
At 20:30 pm, Stephanie Kozel accompanied Tean1 2 and sampled surface soil from O -2 inches deep
at an small, thinly grassed, depressional area that would retain overland runoff from Bay # 13 near
the lead oxide loading point. The soil was sampled for VOC analyses first, then composited in a
clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses. The soil sample was a dark brown, silty
clay, that exhibited no discoloration or odors. The samples were labeled "JC-007-SL". Split
samples were offered and received by Lynn Hanna ofRMT Consultants. The sample point is located
about 3 feet from the edge of the pavement and about 12 feet south of a fire hydrant. The sample
location corresponds to GPS file R08 l 400A. Photo 17 shows Stephanie Kozel compositing soil at
the lead oxide loading area for soil sample JC-007-SL. Photo 18 shows sample point JC-007-SL
relative to a red fire hydrant.
At 20:35 pm, RHB of Team 2 sampled surface soil from 0-3 inches deep of bare soil, about 4 feet
from a set of railroad tracks and 25 feet east northeast of a yellow hydrant, in an area formerly
associated with drum storage. The soil was sampled for VOC analyses first, then composited in a
clean pyrex pan and sampled for SVOC and metals analyses. The soil samples were a light to
medium brown, sandy silt, with clay. The soil samples were labeled "JC-008-SL". Split samples
were offered and received by Lynn Hanna ofRMT Consultants. The sample location corresponds
to GPS file R08 l 400B. Photo 19 shows the soil sample JC-008-SL, relative to the southeast corner
of the facility. Photo 20 shows the color and texture of soil sample JC-008-SL.
At 21 :45 pm, Stuart Parker sampled soil from the top 6 inch profile at the drum storage area, about
27 feet southeast of the yellow fire hydrant, and about 20 feet south of soil sample point JC-008-SL.
The soil was sampled for VOC analyses first, then composited in a clean pyrex pan and sampled for
SVOC and metals analyses. The soil samples were a light brown, silty medium to fine-grained sand.
The soil samples were labeled "JC-009-SL". Split samples were offered and received by Lynn
Hanna of RMT Consultants. The sample location corresponds to GPS file R08 l 400B. Photo 19
shows the soil sample JC-009-SL, relative to a yellow fire hydrant and railroad tracks.
After Team 2 returned to the command post, the samples were bagged and kept in coolers on ice for
the trip back to Raleigh. The coolers were then wrapped with custody seals and strapping tape to
prevent the samples from being tampered with during the trip and overnight storage.
The field equipment was taken apart and packed in the vans. After giving sample JC-001-FB and
JC-002-PB to Mark Bailey, the receipt for samples forms were prepared by Jeanette Stanley and
signed by Mark Bailey. Both teams then policed the area for trash while Doug Moore returned the
visitor badges and signed the team members out of the Johnson Controls security log book. Both
teams departed the site around 22:00 pm and arrived in Raleigh around 24:00 am. The coolers
21
• •
remained locked inside the vans for overnight storage.
Thursday. August 14. 1997
At 08:00 am, Doug Moore inspected the coolers inside each van. As the custody seals were intact,
there was no evidence of tampering with the coolers during overnight storage. The coolers were then
transported to Harrington Street lab to complete the sample labeling, chain of custody
documentation, and sample analytical request documentation. After completing the sample
documentation and labeling, it was determined that the samples could not be delivered until Friday,
due to the UPS strike. Therefore, the inorganics samples were bagged and packed into two coolers
with ice. At 17:09, the two coolers containing inorganics samples were sealed with custody seals
and strapping tape and placed in the large walk-in cooler at the State Laboratory of Public Health,
located in the Bath Building, downtown Raleigh.
At 18:00 pm, Doug Moore hand delivered four coolers of organics samples to CompuChem
Environmental Laboratories at 4600 Silicon Drive, Research Triangle Park, N.C. The sample
custody was relinquished to Diane Ellmore of CompuChem.
Friday. August 15. 1997
At 09:30 am, Doug Moore picked up the two coolers with inorganics samples from the large walk-in
cooler at the Bath Building. As the custody seals were intact, there was no evidence of tampering
with the coolers during overnight storage. The coolers were then transported to Harrington Street
lab to complete the sample labeling, chain of custody documentation, and sample analytical request
documentation. After completing the sample documentation and labeling, the coolers were then
transported to RDU airport.
At 14:30 pm, Doug Moore and Jeanette Stanley delivered three coolers ofinorganics samples (two
coolers went to ChemTech Consulting for Regular Analytical Services, and one cooler went to
Antech for both Regular Analytical Services and Special Analytical Services) to Federal Express at
the North Cargo Area of RDU airport. All three coolers were relinquished into the custody of
Michelle Evans of Federal Express.
22
. ' ''
\/
'.
' I
•
,
\ I' i r \
,I
•
Naine of Firm .
T WASTE MANAGEMENT D~f!ON
RecfiJ21_for S_amRles
Firm Address · ... I
-b-f''.l-lD'.LL:.~'+f--<-XJLJ£l.lm'..'~'J.llll.,~'-Ll..f..p.CI.JLll_l!Ct ; le IJ... rK m r_ {ens_ .. rk_ nl:s Firm Owner, Operator, or Agent Title U'
•-SAMPLE
NUMBER
COLLECTED
DATE:TIME
SAMPLE TYPE
WATERiSOIL:OTHER
.·. DUPLICATE SAMPLE
. OFRD i ACPT i RJCTD
... l SAMPLE LOCATION I
ONSITE:OFFSITE
t..,.,=-
l--
t.---"""' . ,___
Receipt for t e sample(s) described
above is hereby acknowleclgecl:
Signature of Inspector
Title
.Receipt/rejection of duplicate or
split samples is hereby acknowleclgecl:
Title ,
/vt6.-..-k Oa,ky duo -,15 'ft..t sct,,.,p ~½ -fn.~ : ?er /u.l_ r'nskv v1-,;,,.,,_, ky p/.tm,..
tfff1, f-1.J__ Sa.'rlt_ ,~ 'iLcfcJ ~°' ol,r1osed ~ a.-4th'CA I rvrrr,S-M _
A•\COCR.FRM)
I
~ WASTE MANAGEMENT rflrsION
Receipt for S.amples
Name of Firm Firm Address J d,-s n~ {fks(M {rm-b&)}/}Jad( Ed~ r?mrChri.~,d11fr
r<irm Owner, Opera r, or Agent Title ~
SAMPLE COLLECTED SAMPLE TYPE DUPLICATE SAMPLE SAMPI-E LOCATION NUMBER ·DATE/TIME WATER/SOIL:OTHER OFRDiACPTiRJCTD ONSITE/OFFSITE
"j"&-tv-lA, .< I"'\ ~fi7/,H l.~l\1' c.J I . ..J. i..---,---~ -:Sc-01-,-s.o ~1,'z '1 -oq'lo ~,J. ./-~ >-,__.... , -
--Sc-017-5uJ i 11'1 i, nq~o ,.,,/" ' ----,_---,
-:< G '7l)t 0w ?:: ''Z.. 'l~,1 //41 z...,-----' I ----. ~ J.--
--s'C-0/.J-SD ' tl I ,j 1 12,.s ./,../ ' I .-i..--I -.-
(). l L -S,,.J • 1· itz.< J ~ /1 -,,_ ,_
/ ----(__
--<L-IJ I I-<, n $ '/7 ,_ J Rt1< -;;,,,r/,-.... .J
, __ .. ~ L----
JI I;,. q. · ,IA~< -,
--('/ -h I "L<;;, v--L-,----, -,
Se,--oJ,-<n <:..fn t 'h //,,-IT) • '.j, ,I,;.,.,,./-·, -i...--,:____
"1/.-nl l ..... <r. <7 ,,-!J -1--J J~-r;-I_.,/" ' ----,_ L---·-v -I ~ lr/ f7 J-Jz_/,, i-----·----· t---L---.. ' . -:51--on-<t--. ' rlrf.. 11 /-J.t;-"< ,,., I .J ,,_,,.,,. . L----<,. -1 (M--<,, & ,;_ 'c,'-7 1-Jz.(, ,_,,.,,. ,___.,--/ -
-✓ o·-, -\ -Il..Jl"'I' i /Z J 'iJ i'S'l..'J c.,,l .. ..J ~ /
·-<l--003-"i, ) ,i ;zlth lt/'2-5' ,
i::. /,,../ ,___,,.--
Recei t for the sam le s p p ( ) described Recei t re·ection of du p / J p licate or
above is hereby acknowledged: split samples is hereby acknowledged:
Sign er tor,
or Agent
Title Title
Comments: --------------------------------
/\c\ COCR.f-RM)
.&re WASTE MANAGEMENT ~ISION
!'age S___otj:
Receipt for $_amples
Name of FJrm Firm Address , ·
~Cfac(S &9-hki (sh St¥) Cmrb-ol>) j /fh~I( pai/ev1. l<.1 /JlJ: (D,su./lc11(ft ~irm Owner, Operator, or Agent Title/· . ~ .
'' ) SAMPLE COLLECTED SAMPLE TYPE 'DUPLICATE SAMPLE SAMPl,E LOCATION NUMBER · DATE[TIME WATER[SOIL[OTHER OFRD/ACPTiRJCTD ONSITEiOFFSITE
-s't-/o<i..-5u) $? 12/ '11 14-z...< ·~ / L.----k ,____. -/,' I' I)( L/-") I:;/ /hJ,,u.,, --< fr,</. /, LJ ICj7 v-L--\/ -" ' ~ -~ I :, ,1,,., 'I'< ✓ <i -11 ,. re;--, .......... V {_..--, . '.
-("i -nra'_<r ~ ,-lk;, /IA 4) ,.. . I. ,____,-/ , ---II , IA',; r JY\,hr/l . . --V.."'W;;:_ /, . ti 'J/ti -1 -./.Lt, ,. J -. . -
'-:?e,.tJ /3-SL ~./~ q, // <;7) f ' V' I v--------~
~/ A>l4-SL 4 ,~Jq~ ;°,;;-4) I ./ 1--,___.--i.....--
~-Dtll-/J:) 11{ iti-1/ nD 1./ -~ , ,.,,-I :;_./ --, ,, -oo I -<;r; $5 17,/t;, 1/.30 :;.,I __J v-V----·· ~ -J 1!/1~/t11 )l.3 0 . ,J, .d --1 r -oo-z.-<J rJ' ,.,...----~ ~ --<: I -nn·:r,-<1 ~ ;,Jq--1 })J< .'J .... --I.,..-..----i----·
-0 -., J c.-u, ~~ ~IA. j /;~)th 1no<s ,.,,.----~ . -· v--, ---'\ C --Doll Si'> ~11{/q-, ,.,._ ./, -Ill,,-, v--· ~ ,.____.--
---(°f-1'.l"JC:"-$".J ' I ~Ith L---g 13 l~f)~ J ---l--~ ,:__..
,i-c..-00<,-ST> I,~ /4-I,;? ,,1. , --z.-.---fs •/2-~t;'" L-----,/ ,.,,-
Recei t f 5r tl'le sam le s p p ( ) described Recei t re·ection of clu PI J P licate or above is hereby acknowledged: split samples is hereby acknowleclgtd:
Comments:
A:\COCKFJ"\1)
Signature of Firm
or Agent
Title
'• r;
--------------------------------
~ • ID WASTE MANAGEMENT rttrsroN
Receipt for $_ample,
Name of Firm . . Firm Address
C,hcr:s f~;:£J\,(C\ / mfk) K' 'J3c. if~) Kmr CnnSu Hcvnf5 _ Firm Owner, Operator, oTAgent Title · _ .
·c. "·' .SAMPLE
NUMBER ·
,
COLLECTED
"DATE l TIME
n 1.,11.,
. ,_fD7 ..L G •• -~ /1 2, D
SAMPLE TYPE
WATER:soIL:OTHER
/ .I I
' r.,1 ...._ , '
) !
£.,.-,--"
·::·DUPLICATE SAMPLE
i : OFRD [ ACPT l RJCTD
I /'. ~
~
t.---""
,-
SAMPL,E LOCATION
ONSITE:OFFSITE
f ----
J
,__--
i--
t--
.,.---
I./
I./
.,,--
Receipt f< r t e fample(s) described
above is hereby acknowledged:
Receipt/rejection of duplicate or
split samples is hereby acknowledged:
Title
Comments: --------------------------------
11:\COCR.rRM)
~ \\'ASTE MANAGEMENT .1S!ON
Receipt for $_amples
Naine ~ Firm . . .· Firm Address 7
Clza3 &J.h ~hnSOrJ Cnnfto !s)/ 1ll11 r;~Ec; i 4J:J I'm T !'OISi. 1/4,i"& ~irm Owner, Operator, or gent Title. _,,. .
SAMPLE COLLECTED, .. SAMPLE TYPE NUMBER DATE i TIME WATERiSOILiOTHER
----:0--rit 1-s L I I 'Z 'h /{f-z,5 ~
-'(;,,,{)/2,-(;/__ ' , , ;,~ /-7 ::;]I) L/ V , J /
~ ,-,001-PI/J • r;; M -::io1< v-
-?1_..ro--,fJIAI ~ rr' ~/01) I _.,,,,.---~ " ' -• (:;, 1?~ 2/"?J) ~-~--, 117 J/ . ta) ·y I ., J ,
·-.
Receipt for the sample(s) descnbed
above is hereby acknowledged:
Title
Comments:
' .· DUPLICATE SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATION
OFRD•/ ACPT i RJ_CTD ONSITEiOFFSITE
t.---. ~ I ./
• ~ ~
I -----
l.-..-. I _,.,..-/----
' I J--L.,/"' J-,,--'" ,,,...,-
i _i---· (../ L----
Rece1pt/reJecuon of duplicate or
split samples is hereby acknowledged:
or Agent
Title
----------------------------------
/\:\COCKFRM)
Return to: Douglas Moore
Division of Waste Management
NC Superfund Section
401 Oberlin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
The NC Superfund Section is granted permission to access the property of Johnson Controls, located
at 2701 Johnson Controls Road near Kernersville, North Carolina, for the purpose of collecting
environmental samples. This property is identified as lot #201, block #3262 on Sheet 654862, in
the mapping department of Forsyth County Engineering Department. The access granted will cover
the dates of an Expanded Site Inspection sampling event, to be determined by the project manager,
Douglas Moore.
Signature
<t/11 /q 7
f DatJ
Cht;-5 J;;,/2e1<.
Please Print Name
l
E ou. Eqy1ne__e/G
Title
•. ' , State of North Caroli~
Department of Envir.,-ient,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
FAX TRANSMITTAL RECORD
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Number of pages (including cover)
Comments:
Confirm receipt of document(s):
---------~ Superfund Section
Sf/slb(C:\WPWIN601WPDOCS\SF\SF-FAX.FRM)
P.O. Box 27687,
Superfund Section
[phone], ext __ _
FAX [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Voice 919-733-4996 f#MJJl4Jk$d
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/10"/4 post-consumer paper
Sample Id#
JC-001-SL (2)
JC-101-SL (2)
JC-002-SL (1)
JC-003-SL (1)
JC-004-SL (1)
JC-005-SL (1)
JC-006-SL (2)
JC-007-SL (2)
JC-008-SL (2)
JC-009-SL (2)
JC-010-SL (1) ·
JC-011-SL (1)
JC-012-SL (2)
JC-013-SL (2)
JC-014-SL (1)
JC-001-SW/SD
(1)
• •
Table 1: Sample Locations and Descriptions
Expanded Site Inspection
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
NCD 000 770 487
Location Justification Sample Matrix
NW of facility Background GrabSoil
NW of facility Split Backgroundto Grab Soil
test sample
handling variability
Acid Storage Tank Potential Source and Grab Soil
establish dimensions
Acid Storage Tank Potential Source and Grab Soil
establish dimensions
Acid Storage Tank Potential Source and Grab Soil
establish dimensions
Acid Storage Tank Potential Source and Grab Soil
establish dimensions
Lead Oxide Potential Source Grab Soil
Unloading Dock
Lead Oxide Potential Source Grab Soil
Unloading Dock
Drum Storage Area Potential Source Grab Soil
Drum Storage Area Potential Source Grab Soil
Catch Basin near Attribution Grab Soil
Acid Storage Tank
Below Splash Pad at Attribution and Grab Soil
north end of facility Potential Source
Below Splash Pad Attribution and Grab Soil
above Basin 3 Potential Source
Below Splash Pad Attributioin and Grab Soil
above Basin 2 Potential Source
Below Splash Pad Attribution and Grab Soil
above Basin l Potential Source
UT above confluenc Background Aqueous
of drainage from Sediment
Basin I
Analyses
V,S,I, including
TCLP metals.
V ,S,I including
TCLP metals.
V,S,I, including
TCLP metals.
V,S,I, including
TCLP metals.
V,S,I, including
TCLP metals.
V,S,I, including
TCLP metals.
V,S,I including
TCLP metals.
V ,S,I including
TCLP metals
V ,S,l including
TCLP metals
V ,S,I including
TCLP metals
V,S,I
V,S,I
V,S,I
V,S,l
V,S,I
V,S,I
•
JC-002-SW/SD Below Spillway of Establish release for Aqueous V,S,I
(2) Basin 3 attribution Sediment
JC-003-SW/SD Below Spillway of Establish release for Aqueous V,S,I
(2) Basin 2 attribution Sediment
JC-004-SW/SD Below Spillway of Establish release for Aqueous V,S,I
(I) Basin I attribution Sediment
JC-005-SW/SD From small leachate Establish release Aqueous V,S,I
(I) stream of unnamed from GW discharge Sediment
tributary of Basin I for attribution
JC-006-SW/SD From 300 feet below Establish release Aqueous Y,S,J
(I) wetland headwater impacting nearest Sediment
on unnamed trib. of SW target
Basin 1
JC-106-SW (I) Same as JC-006-SW QA/QC Aqueous Aqueous V,S,I
Duplicate to confirm Sediment
JC-007-SW/SD From 300 feet below Establish release Aqueous V,S,I
(I) wetland headwater impacting nearest Sediment
on unnamed trib. of SW target.
Basins 2 & 3.
JC-107-SW (I) Same as JC-007-SW QA/QC Aqueous Aqueous V,S,I
Duplicate to confirm Sediment
JC-008-SW/SD From Lowery Creek Background Aqueous V,S,I
(1) above the confluence Sediment
withunnamed trib. of
Basins 2 & 3
JC-108-SW/SD From Lowery Creek Double Volumes of Aqueous V,S,I
(I) above the confluence background for Sediment
withunnamed trib. of MS/MSD
Basins 2 & 3 Split of sediment to
test sample handling
variability.
JC-009-SW/SD From Lowery Creek Establish release Aqueous V,S,I
(1) below confluence from unnamed trib. Sediment
with unnamed trib. of Basins 2&3 to
of Basins 2 & 3 Lowery Creek
JC-010-SW/SD From unnamed trib. Control Sample Aqueous V,S,J
(2) discahrging to Sediment
Lowery Creek, about
500 feet below
confluence with
Basin 2/3 trib.
• •
JC-011-SW/SD From unnamed trib. Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
(2) discharging to Sediment
Lowery Creek, about
1000 feet below
confluence with
Basin 2/3 trib.
JC-012-SW/SD From Lowery Creek Establish release Aqueous V,S,1
(1) below confluence from unnamed trib. Sediment
with unnamed trib of of Basin I to Lowery
Basin I Creek
JC-013-SW/SD From unnamed trib. Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
(2) discharging to North Sediment
side of Lowery
Creek, about 200
feet below
confluence with
Basin I trib.
JC-014-SW/SD From unnamed trib. Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
(1) discharging to South Sediment
side of Lowery
Creek, about !000
feet below
confluence with
Basin I trib.
JC-015-SW/SD From unnamed trib. Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
(2) discharging to North Sediment
side of Lowery
Creek, about I 300
feet below
confluence with
Basin I trib.
JC-016-SW/SD From unnamed trib. Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
(2) discharging to North Sediment
side of Salem Lake,
about 3000 feet
below confluence
with Basin 1 trib.
JC-017-SW/SD From unnamed trib. Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
(2) discharging to North Sediment
side of Salem Lake,
about 3500 feet
below confluence
with Basin 1 trib.
JC-018-SW/SD From North side of Establish release Aqueous V,S,l
(1) Old Greensboro impacting nearest Sediment
Road bridge over fishery and
Salem Lake. additional wetland
frontage
. ' •
JC-019-SD (1) Same as JC-018-SD QA/QC Sediment Aqueous V,S,1
Duplicate to confirm Sediment
JC-020-SW (2) From Salem Lake Public Health Aqueous V,S,I
DW raw water Concern Sediment
intake
JC-021-SW/SD South wing of Salem Background for Aqueous V,S,I
(2) Lake @Greensboro JC-018-SW/SD thru Sediment
Rd bridge JC-020-SW/SD
JC-001-PW Moore DW well Public Health Aqueous V,S,I
2635 West Mountain Concern
Road
JC-002-PW Pettycord DW well Background Aqueous V,S,I
302 Walkerton-
Guthrie Road
JC-001-TB Trip Blank QA/QC Aqueous V
JC-002-TB Trip Blank QA/QC Soil V
JC-001-FB Field Blank QA/QC Aqueous I
JC-001-PB Pre-preservative QA/QC Aqueous I
blank
JC-002-PB Post -preservative QA/QC Aqueous I
blank
V = volatile organics, S= Semi-volatile organics, I = Inorganics
TCLP = Toxicity Charateristic Leachate Procedure
Sample Totals:
Aqueous:
(1) voe (40 ml x 2)
(2) BNA (2 Liter Amber)
(3) Metals (1 Liter HOPE)
JL
26
25
28
Sediment/Soil:
(I) VOC (125 ml-Septa Lid)
(2) BNA (125 ml)
(3) Metals (125 ml)
JL
36
35
35
We requested 30 Aqueous CLP numbers and 40 Soil/Sediment CLP numbers from EPA to cover
additional samples, if necessary.
,,
State of North Carolfi
Department of Envif•onment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
July 9, 1997
Mr. Chris Fisher, Process and Environmental Engineer
Johnson Controls
270 I Johnson Controls Road
P.O. Box 1667
Kernersville, North Carolina 27285
Subj.: Transmittal of Approved Expanded Site Inspection Sampling Plan
Johnson Controls -Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
US EPA ID: NCO 000 770 487
Dear Mr. Fisher:
Attached is the proposed Expanded Site Inspection (ES!) sampling plan that has been
approved by US EPA Region IV Remedial Project Manager, Jennifer Wendell, for the subject site.
The primary purpose of the sampling investigation is to determine if site related contamination could
have impacted nearby downstream surface water pathway targets, such as wetlands and fisheries.
The sampling trip will likely be a two-three day event, involving two sampling teams of two
people per team. If Johnson Controls would like to receive split samples for independent
confirmation, we will be glad to provide the split samples. However, the company will have to make
arrangements to have representatives available to accompany each team to receive the split samples,
provide their own sampling jars and arrange to have the samples analyzed at a laboratory of their
choice.
In order to achieve a quick and orderly sampling event, we ask consent from Johnson
Controls for the following items. We will need to designate an area on the site where we can set up
a small canopy tent and table for sample preservation, labeling, preparation of supporting
documentation, and gross decontamination of field equipment and personal protective gear. As a
potential Health and Safety precaution, in the areas where we will be colle,cting onsite soil samples,
we may request that a utilities locator be present to identify any potential utility lines.
In the event that Johnson Controls would like split samples, we will prepare a sample receipt
document designating the samples that were split and the date and time of collection, which a
company representative needs to sign showing that the split samples were received. For safety
P.O. Box 27687. Raleigh. North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone 919-733-~996 F/\.X 919-715-3605
An Equal Opportuni1y Affirmative Aclior, Employer 50% recycled/ l 0% post-consumor paper
Letter to Mr. Fisher
Johnson Controls
July 9, I 997
Page 2
•
reasons, we request that the person receiving split samples have completed the appropriate OSHA
Hazardous Waste Site Operations training. For our records, please have a company representative
sign the attached consent document agreeing to site access for the sampling trip and return it to me
at the address printed on the document before the event.
A couple of errors were identified in the original sampling plan that will be corrected during
the sampling event. In Section 2.0, the samples will be analyzed for target compound list (TCL)
organics and target analyte list (T AL) inorganics using the current version of EP A's Contract
Laboratory Program Statement of Work for multi-media, multi-concentration analyses, instead of
the EPA Methods stated in the first paragraph. The TCLP metals will be analyzed by Special
Analytical Services request using the EPA Method 1311. In section 2.1, the soil pH and sulfate
analyses will not be requested, as originally stated. In section 2.2, the Superfund Section will not
request that soil samples be analyzed for the presence of strontium and tellurium.
We would like to arrange the sampling trip for early August. This will give us both time to
make any necessary arrangements before the sampling event. Please let us know if there is a
scheduling conflict. I appreciate the cooperation of Johnson Controls in this matter. If I can be of
further assistance, please contact me at [phone], ext. 315.
attachments
cc: File
Sincerely,
Douglas Moore
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
Division of Waste Management
Return to:
•
Douglas Moore
Division of Waste Management
NC Superfund Section
401 Oberlin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
The NC Superfund Section is granted permission to access the property of Johnson Controls, located
at 2701 Johnson Controls Road near Kernersville, North Carolina, for the purpose of collecting
environmental samples. This property is identified as lot #201, block #3262 on Sheet 654862, in
the mapping department of Forsyth County Engineering Department. The access granted will"cover
the dates of an Expanded Site Inspection sampling event, to be determined by the project manager,
Douglas Moore.
Signature Date
Please Print Name Title
I 'I
I
' ·I
!
i ' .,
i
NC SUPERFUND SECTION Fax:[phone] • • ** Transmit Conf.Report **
Jul 9 '97 10:03
NC SUPERFUND SECTION ---> 84045628788
No. 0002
Mode NORMAL
Time 1 '15"
Pages 2 Page(s)
Result 0 K
NORTH SUPERFUND ID:404-562-8788 JUL 09'97
United S .. Environmental Protection Ag. 10:03 No.007 P.01
Region IV &EPA 61 Forsyth Street
Atlanta, GA 30303
F.acs.imi.1" cover SbP-et
=·•)*
FAX No: 919-733-4811
From: JenniferWendel-U.S. EPA
Office phone: ( 404)-562-8799
FAX: [phone]
Date: July 9, tm
MESSAGE: Johnson Controls, ESI Sampling plan approval
Office code: 11th fl
Number of pages,
including cover:
RECEIVED
JUL 091997
s,u~ERFUND SECTION
NORTH SUPERFUND ID:404-562-8788 •
Letter to Mr. Vorsatz
Johnson Control Sampling Plan
June 26, 1997
Page 6
JUL 09'97 10:04 No.007 P.02 • r:·r r ~ .. -: \ ;:.: :··i
~\t •. \~··:... .• ••·····l ...
JUL 09 1997
,SUPERFUND SECTION
in a log book designated for this particular investigation.
Since the site contaminants consist primarily of metals which are known to easily sorb to
organic sediments, sediment samples will be collected from fine, silty, dark-colored sediments
containing relatively high organic contents. The sampler will record the physical characteristics of
each sediment sample (color, sheen, odor, etc ... ) in a log book designated for this particular
investigation.
Since surface water from Salem Lake may contain a naturally higher turbidity than surface
water from Lowery Creek, a background surface water and sediment sample will be collected from
the south wing of Salem Lake at the Old Greensboro Road bridge.
A surface water sample will be collected from the drinking water intake on Salem Lake to
address any potential public health concerns. No sediment sample will be collected at this location.
The sample descriptions and locations arc outlined in Table I and depicted in figures I and
2. Additional soil samples may be collected, if stained or devegetated soils are encountered, or if
areas designated for composites are too large for one sample. lf you have any questions regarding
this proposed sampling plan, please contact me at [phone], ext. 315.
Attachments
cc: File
sat:,, Chief
Site Management Section
Sincerely,
!Jouglas Moo~
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
State of North Ca.ina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
Jomes B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathon B. Howes, Secretory
William L. Meyer. Director
June 26, 1997
Mr. Phil Vorsatz, Chief
NC Site Management Section
U.S. EPA-Waste Management Division
Atlanta Federal Building
61 Forsyth St., I Ith Floor
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104
Subj: Expanded Site Inspection Sampling Plan
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, N.C.
US EPA ID: NCD 000 770 487
Dear Mr. Vorsatz:
Enclosed please find a copy of the proposed ESI sampling plan for the Johnson Controls-
Globe Battery Division site (EPA ID: NCD 000 770 487), tentatively scheduled for late July 1997,
located near the town of Guthrie, about 3 miles east of Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
LO Site Conditions and History
The site location is indicated on Figure I. The site covers one parcel of property totalling
approximately 75 acres. The site is located near the top of a small hill, that slopes to the northwest
towards Lowery Creek and west towards an unnamed tributary to Lowery Creek. Surface runoff
from the main facility is collected in catch basins where it is directed underground through culverts
to three splash pads at the heads of three sedimentation basins located along the west boundary of
the site. These three basins are designed to collect storm water runoff from the site, allowing
particulates to settle out before being discharged from a flow-through pipe in the dam to the
unnamed tributary. Pond #1 discharges to a small unnamed intermittent tributary that directs runoff
northwest to Lowery Creek. Ponds #2 and #3 discharge to a second unnamed intermittent tributary
that directs runoff north to Lowery Creek. The site has never been permitted under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES).
The plant was constructed in 1978 to manufacture automobile batteries. Batteries are
assembled and charged at the site. In 1984, plant production was estimated at 6,000-11,000 batteries
per day. The facility has expanded it's operations and the plant production is currently estimated at
between 16,000-22,000 batteries per day. Raw materials used in the production of batteries include
pig lead, lead oxide, barium sulphate, carbon black and sulphuric acid.
P.O. Box 27687. Raleigh. North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
Letter to Mr. Vorsatz
Johnson Control Sampling Plan
June 26, 1997
Page 2
•
The facility is currently listed as a RCRA large quantity generator. Wastewaters generated
during the production process are treated with sodium hydroxide, then precipitated with ferrous
sulfate, filtered to remove the large solids, and filter pressed to produce the lead sludge filter cake.
The filter cake and lead contaminated solid wastes are shipped off-site to lead smelters.
Hazardous wastes generated during the operation are stored at the plant in 55 gallon drums
and IO mil polyethylene bags. Hazardous wastes generated at the plant consist of pasting conveyer
belts, floor sweeping compounds, fiber and plastic separators, waste paper toweling, wipe cloths,
cheese cloths, work gloves, whole HEP A filters, fabric bag filters, wastewater treatment plant
residue and wet scrubber (rotoclone) sludge. Wastewater treatment plant residue and rotoclone
sludge are removed on a batch basis and stored in a separate container storage area, and subsequently
shipped to a smelter. Disposal practices prior to 1980 are not well documented. The dry waste is
containerized and segregated in a separate waste storage area, prior to shipment to a smelter.
The facility produced about 122,000 pounds oflead wastewater treatment sludge (0008) and
400 pounds of barium waste (0005) in 1980, about 31,275 pounds of lead wastewater treatment
sludge (0008), and 2,640 pounds of waste petroleum naphtha (DOOi) in 1988, 63,133 pounds of
lead wastewater treatment sludge (0008) and 3,520 pounds of waste petroleum naphtha (DOOi) in
1989.
There have been several spills at the plant since 1979. In 1979, approximately 3,000 gallons
of sulphuric acid was spilled while a tank was being filled, another I ,000 gallons of lead oxide and
lead sulphate containing wastewaters spilled to one of the three sedimentation basins in I 981, an
unknown amount of sulphuric acid was spilled in 1982, and an unknown amount was spilled from
a leaking valve in a sulphuric acid transfer line in 1996. One of the three acid spills also reportedly
reached a nearby sedimentation basin.
2.0 Sources
Potential source areas used in evaluating the site are identified in Figure 2. Samples will be
collected from three potential source areas and analyzed for volatile organics compounds per EPA
method 8240, semi-volatile organics compounds per EPA method 8270, total metals per EPA 7000
series methods and toxicity characteristic leachable metals per EPA method 1311. All source
samples will be collected in accordance with the May 1996 EPA Environmental Investigations
Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual.
An authoritative sampling plan was chosen to determine the presence of contaminants at
potential source areas. Because of the biased nature of the sampling design, the degree of
representativeness is difficult to estimate. Therefore, the quality assurance samples for this section
of the sampling plan will be confined to collecting split samples to determine the sample handling
Letter to Mr. Vorsatz
Johnson Control Sampling Plan
June 26, 1997
Page 3
•
variability. Several additional sets of sampling jars and equipment will be carried into the field to
collect supplementary source samples, if needed based on visual observation of stained soils, stressed
vegetation, or as deemed necessary by the project manager.
The primary contaminant associated with site activities is lead, which exhibits a limited
mobility, is easily adsorbed to clay-rich soils, and is also likely to have been deposited by fugitive
air emissions. For this reason, the source samples will be collected from the top 3 inches of soils at
the site. Since fugitive emissions could influence background soil lead concentrations, a
background soil sample and split background soil sample will be chosen in the field from soils that
are geologically similar and unlikely to have been affected by emissions from the site.
2.1 Acid Storage Tank Area
As noted previously, at least three spills of sulphuric acid have been reported at the acid
storage tank area. According to plant personnel, the most recent spill occurred in 1996 and was not
remediated due to the relatively small scale. A composite surface soil sample (JC-SS-02) collected
near the acid storage tank area in 1992 exhibited elevated levels of arsenic and calcium, relative to
the background soil sample (JC-SS-01 ). A soil boring, advanced to 11 feet below grade near the acid
storage area (JC-SB-02) in 1992, also exhibited elevated concentrations of arsenic and calcium,
relative to the background soil boring (JC-SB-01 ). No analyses for sulfates were requested at that
time.
The NC Superfund Section proposes to collect 4 surface soil grab samples in the vicinity of
the acid storage tank source area to determine an areal extent of soil contamination. Because
concentrated sulfuric acid can leach metals from native soil potentially affecting groundwater, soil
pH and total sulfate analyses will be requested for this set of soil samples in addition to the total
metals and TCLP analyses.
For attribution purposes, a soil grab sample will be collected from the bottom of a catch basin
that receives overland runoff from this area of the site, located immediately north of the acid storage
tank area. Overland runoff is directed north underneath the main facility to a splash pad where it
discharges to surface soils. Another surface soil grab sample will be collected below this splash pad
north of the main facility. The soil samples will be analyzed for the same parameters.as described
above.
Letter to Mr. Vorsatz
Johnson Control Sampling Plan
June 26, 1997
Page 4
2.2 Lead Oxide Unloading Dock
•
Lead oxide is reportedly unloaded from train cars at the east side of the main facility. No
samples have been collected in the vicinity of the lead oxide unload point.
We propose to collect a couple of soil grab samples from any areas of exposed soil along the
rail line near the lead oxide unload point. Source sample locations will be selected based on visual
observation of contamination or devegetated areas, if present. Source dimensions will be based upon
the lab results, should any elevated concentrations be found in the soil samples.
The following metals are reportedly present in lead alloys used in automotive batteries-
antimony, arsenic, barium, calcium, selenium, silver, strontium, tellurium and zinc. Because the
industry typically reuses scrap lead from older batteries, the presence of numerous metal impurities
may be encountered in lead oxide. For this reason, the Superfund Section will request that the soil
samples from the lead oxide unloading dock are tested for the above mentioned metals in addition
to total lead and TCLP analyses.
2.3 Drum Storage Area
In a May 1991 reconnaissance, Greenhorne and O'Mara, Inc. noted that materials such as
plastic battery cases, aluminum flake paste, battery terminals, 55-gallon drums of petroleum-based
lubricants and broken battery parts were stored at the southeast corner of the site A composite soil
sample collected near a loading dock/drum storage area (JC-SS-03) exhibited elevated levels of
calcium and lead.
We propose to collect a couple of surface soil grab samples at the southeast corner of the site
in the vicinity of the former drum storage area. Since battery parrts were reportedly stored in this
area, the Superfund Section will also request that the soil samples be tested for the same parameters
as identified in the lead oxide soil samples from section 2.2. The source dimensions will be based
on visual observation of contamination, or devegetated areas, if present.
3.0 Targets
The primary targets associated with the site are two wetland areas located from 900-1500 feet
downstream of the sedimentation basins, along two perennial streams that direct site drainage to
Lowery Creek. Both wetland areas have been confirmed by John Thomas, wetlands specialist with
the Army Corps of Engineers. Their locations are designated on map 2. Both wetlands extend
downstream to the confluence with Lowery Creek. Thus, the probable points of entry of site runoff
to surface water are located at the beginning of each wetland.
Letter to Mr. Vorsatz
Johnson Control Sampling Plan
June 26, 1997
Page 5
•
Lowery Creek also has wetlands extending downstream from the confluences of both
perennial streams to the headwaters of Salem Lake. According to Cary Bostic, District 7 Wildlife
Enforcement Officer, Salem Lake is regularly fished by boat. No fishing could be established in
. Lowery Creek. The nearest location where people fish from the bank is located at the Old
Greensboro Road bridge over Salem Lake, approximately 1.0 mile downstream of PPE. The city
of Winston-Salem operates a surface water intake on Salem Lake that serves 20-30% of the water
supply for Forsyth County. The Salem Lake intake is located at the dam, approximately 2.1 miles
downstream of the site.
The nearest drinking water well is located at the Pettycord residence, 302 Walkerton-Guthrie
Road, approximately 0.25 mile northeast of the facility.
3.1 Surface Water Pathway Sampling Design
During the May 1997 onsite reconnaissance, three sedimentation basins were observed that
retain runoff along the west boundary of the site. The basins are part of a permitted stormwater
management plan for the facility. The discharge from the basins enters two tributaries where it is
then directed to Lowery Creek. Since the basins had recently been dredged and rebuilt, the sampling
design incorporates collection of soil samples prior to and following discharge of runoff at each
basin. ·
The surface water sampling plan design consists of collecting numerous surface water and
sediment samples from the unnamed tributaries leading from the site to Lowery Creek, from Lowery
Creek and from Salem Lake, to determine if contamination could.be identified in surface water or
sediments from each of the primary targets. In order to accomplish this, numerous surface water and
sediment control samples were added to the sampling plan as a quality control measure to evaluate
whether any alternate sources may be discharging to Lowery Creek between the site and the nearest
fishery. All surface water sample locations will be recorded by Global Positioning System (GPS)
and recorded in the log book designated for this particular investigation.
Duplicate surface water and sediment samples will be collected from either surface water or
sediment locations considered critical to the HRS score for the site to confirm the presence of any
contaminants that may be detected in any of these samples. In addition, a double volume of surface
water samples will be collected from the background location on Lowery Creek to be used as the
matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate sample by the contract laboratory. In addition, a field blank
and a post-preservative blank will be collected to evaluate the potential for cross contamination.
There are several mixing zones between the site and the nearest fishery. Where possible,
sample locations from mixing zones will be chosen to collect a well-mixed representative sample.
The sampler will record pH, temperature, conductivity and turbidity readings of each sample point
Letter to Mr. Vorsatz
Johnson Control Sampling Plan
June 26, 1997
Page 6
•
in a log book designated for this particular investigation.
Since the site contaminants consist primarily of metals which are known to easily sorb to
organic sediments, sediment samples will be collected from fine, silty, dark-colored sediments
containing relatively high organic contents. The sampler will record the physical characteristics of
each sediment sample (color, sheen, odor, etc ... ) in a log book designated for this particular
investigation.
Since surface water from Salem Lake may contain a naturally higher turbidity than surface
water from Lowery Creek, a background surface water and sediment sample will be collected from
the south wing of Salem Lake at the Old Greensboro Road bridge.
A surface water sample will be collected from the drinking water intake on Salem Lake to
address any potential public health concerns. No sediment sample will be collected at this location.
The sample descriptions and locations are outlined in Table I and depicted in figures I and
2. Additional soil samples may be collected, if stained or devegetated soils are encountered, or if
areas designated for composites are too large for one sample. If you have any questions regarding
this proposed sampling plan, please contact me at (9 I 9) 733-2801, ext. 3 I 5.
Attachments
<C£==Eile:l
Sincerely,
Douglas Moore
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
APPROVED: _____________ _
Phil Vorsatz, Chief Date
NCSite Management Section
Sample Id#
JC-001-SL
JC-101-SL
JC-002-SL
JC-003-SL
JC-004-SL
JC-005-SL
JC-006-SL
JC-007-SL
JC-008-SL
JC-009-SL
JC-010-SL
JC-011-SL
JC-012-SL
JC-013-SL
JC-014-SL
•
Table 1: Sample Locations and Descriptions
Expanded Site Inspection
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
NCD 000 770 487
Location Justification Sample Matrix
NW of facility Background GrabSoil
NW of facility Split Backgroundto Grab Soil
test sample
handling variability
Acid Storage Tank Potential Source and Grab Soil
establish dimensions
Acid Storage Tank Potential Source and Grab Soil
establish dimensions
Acid Storage Tank Potential Source and Grab Soil
establish dimensions
Acid Storage Tank Potential Source and Grab Soil
establish dimensions
Lead Oxide Potential Source Grab Soil
Unloading Dock
Lead Oxide Potential Source Grab Soil
Unloading Dock
Drum Storage Area Potential Source Grab Soil
Drum Storage Area Potential Source Grab Soil
Catch Basin near Attribution Grab Soil
Acid Storage Tank
Below Splash Pad at Attribution and Grab Soil
north end of facility Potential Source
Below Splash Pad Attribution and Grab Soil
above Basin 3 Potential Source
Below Splash Pad Attributioin and Grab Soil
above Basin 2 Potential Source
Below Splash Pad Attribution and Grab Soil
above Basin 1 Potential Source
Analyses
V,S,I, including
TCLP metals.
V,S,I including
TCLP metals.
V ,S,I, including
TCLP metals.
V,S,I, including
TCLP metals.
V,S,I, including
TCLP metals.
V,S,l, including
TCLP metals.
V,S,l including
TCLP metals.
V ,S,l including
TCLP metals
V ,S,l including
TCLP metals
V ,S,l including
TCLP metals
V,S,I
V,S,I
V,S,l
V,S,I
V,S,I
•
JC-001-SW/SD UT above confluenc Background Aqueous V,S,I
of drainage from Sediment
Basin I
JC-002-SW/SD Below Spillway of Establish release for Aqueous V,S,I
Basin 3 attribution Sediment
JC-003-SW/SD Below Spillway of Establish release for Aqueous V,S,l
Basin 2 attribution Sediment
JC-004-SW/SD Below Spillway of Establish release for Aqueous V,S,l
Basin I attribution Sediment
JC-005-SW/SD · From small leachate Establish release Aqueous V,S,I
stream of unnamed from GW discharge Sediment
tributary of Basin I for attribution
JC-006-SW/SD .. From 300 feet below Establish release Aqueous V,S,I
wetland headwater impacting nearest Sediment
on unnamed trib. of SW target
Basin I
JC-106-SW Sarne as JC-006-SW QNQC Aqueous Aqueous V,S,l
Duplicate Sediment
JC-007-SW/SD From 300 feet below Establish release Aqueous V,S,I
wetland headwater impacting nearest Sediment
on unnamed trib. of SW target
Basins 2 & 3.
JC-107-SW Sarne as JC-007-SW QA/QC Aqueous Aqueous V,S,I
Duplicate Sediment
JC-008-SW/SD · From Lowery Creek Background Aqueous V,S,I
above the confluence (Double Volumes for Sediment
withunnamed trib. of MS/MSD)
Basins 2 & 3 Split of sediment to
test sample handling
variability.
JC-009-SW/SD From Lowery Creek Establish release Aqueous V,S,l
below confluence from unnamed trib. Sediment
with unnamed trib. of Basins 2&3 to
of Basins 2 & 3 Lowery Creek
JC-010-SW/SD From unnamed trib. Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
discahrging to Sediment
Lowery Creek, about
500 feet below
confluence with
Basin 2/3 trib.
JC-011-SW/SD From unnamed trib. Control Sample Aqueous V,S,1
discharging to Sediment
Lowery Creek, about
1000 feet below
confluence with
Basin 2/3 trib.
• •
JC-012-SW/SD From Lowery Creek Establish release Aqueous V,S,I
below confluence from unnamed trib. Sediment
with unnamed trib of of Basin 1 to Lowery
Basin I Creek
JC-013-SW/SD From unnamed trib. Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
discharging to North Sediment
side of Lowery
Creek, about 200
feet below
confluence with
Basin I trib.
JC-014-SW/SD From unnamed trib. Control Sample Aqueous Y,S,I
discharging to South Sediment , side of Lowery
Creek,about 1000
feet below
confluence with
Basin I !rib.
JC-015-SW/SD From unnamed trib. Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
discharging to North Sediment
side of Lowery
Creek, about 1300
feet below
confluence with
Basin I trib.
JC-016-SW/SD · From unnamed trib. Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
discharging to North Sediment
side of Salem Lake,
about 3000 feet
below confluence
with Basin I trib.
JC-017-SW/SD. From unnamed trib. Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
discharging to South Sediment
side of Salem Lake,
about 3500 feet
below confluence
with Basin I trib.
JC-018-SW/SD From North side of Establish release Aqueous V,S,I
Old Greensboro impacting nearest Sediment
Road bridge over fishery and
Salem Lake. additional wetland
frontage
JC-019-SD Same as JC-018-SD QA/QC Sediment Aqueous V,S,I
Duplicate to test Sediment
spatial variability
JC-020-SW From Salem Lake Public Health Aqueous Y,S,1
OW raw water Concern Sediment
intake
•
JC-021-SW/SD South wing of Salem
Lake @Greensboro
Rd bridge
JC-001-PW Pettycord DW wel\
302 Walkerton-
Guthrie Road
JC-002-PW Drinking Water Wei\
(To be determined)
JC-001-TB Field Blank
JC-002-PB Post -Preservative
Blank
Sample Totals:
Aqueous:
(I) voe (40 ml x 2)
(2) BNA (2 Liter Amber)
(3) Metals (I Liter HDPE)
JL
25
25
25
•
Background for Aqueouis
JC-018-SW/SD thru Sediment
JC-020-SW/SD
Public Health Aqueous
Concern
Background Aqueous
QA/QC Aqueous
QA/QC Aqueous
Sediment/Soil:
(1) VOe (125 ml-Septa Lid)
(2) BNA (125 ml)
(3) Metals (125 ml)
V,S,I
V,S,I
V,S,I
V
I
JL
35
35
35
C l
• • ~•\ -' I ',
!:.:•. ·.' _._.,. . .. \ .,
~ -~--1; ·. 1•'{ ; ~
Pr.:F2 l,
' ! ;
~t:-.
~if -013-SW
;c_2 · ~~~ 1 :~,~• _Mc
·,.. 91/~ ,, .. ~· 1.-·r!l.--=~&9;,.;j
. , JC-012-S ' '--'',.'---i-c,a,:( '.) • I\\ l'r,t•' I •~ •
Pl!F1 '
-01 -
y·\,j"
18-SW
'
•li:
•,tfJS~. ,. , •c'.;,;-'-'c.;J~•i=,...__,, I •,'/'.r, ,t. '1 . ., \ ' '{';W?,;,_ Figure I ,, -~--· 1 I ;,,; J-}-: /'Li' . '
A1c:'.:0!.:::::'1'\,','.\©\~: }) ~-'----cc Site Location and Surface Water Pathway Sample Point. ; '.-.
t ;~t~·1;;,_,, Johnson Controls Expanded Site Inspection (ES!) s 0·,
' 1/c!'~'-::'-;-A.::'.~ Wmston Salem, Forsyth County, NC ., J
US EPA ID: NCO 000 770 487 -;
(.-}:;·->>, =~, Scale: 1: 15840 (Soil Survey of Forsyth County, NC) N ~
' '•' ... ~·' .,.;.
, frtfui_;n11~11}; ~j~~~~~~ ··'«,_,.,.___ :~t-,/1,\\\ -'i,<:~,ii-1 y. C:' ~~~~1~~~:~~~1~~es r M ... )'-'•'~':.T, ', > .. ~,-.4 ,c, ... ,;,,,,i, \: . .,. ,,;,~. ,;(., ·,<;,, .-;-K:) Nearest Fishery v_ .. ,.·,, fr·f-~.r-,, f,:•:••,~~1 '. J • · ·,.; r , .. , ... , · ' + Nea t W J •
1 F;i A' •. 1,;,1., · · ' , res et and {~ r,,:t~i:~ l ' '
· il' • ,,;r,., FJ Drinking Water Intake ~;; ~{}t(
\~ ·-: . ·t ---~--·-I
Figure 2. • On-Site Sample Locations
Johnson Controls Expanded Site Inspection (ES!)
Winston Salem, Forsyth County, NC
US EPA ID: NCD 000 770 487
Map Not to Scale
-1/..-Site Boundaries
.di& Wetland Boundary (Approximate) 'Ill l:-"Y-
N
•
Memorandum
Date: June 4, 1997
To:
From:
File
Douglas Moore
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
Subj.: Wetland Delineation
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
US EPA ID: NCO 000 770 487
•
On Tuesday, June 3, 1997, Doug Moore and Stuart Parker of the NC Superfund Section
travelled to the subject site to conduct an offsite reconnaissance of two drainages that connect the
site to Lowery Creek. We arrived at the entrance to the site at 11 :00 where we met with Mr. John
Thomas, wetlands specialist with the Army Corps of Engineers, Chris Fisher, process engineer with
Johnson Controls, and Debbie Hastings, environmental engineer with the Milwaukee Office of
Johnson Controls. After briefing everyone about the purpose of the trip, we drove to the residence
of Otis Crews, a neighbor who owns the adjacent property where the two drainage features are .
located. Fllowing a brief explanation of the purpose of the trip to Mr. Crews, he grated us
permission to conduct our wetland delineation on his property.
From 11 :30-12:15, Doug Moore, Stuart Parker, John Thomas, Chris Fisher and Debbie
Hastings traced the drainage from pond #1 downstream to a power line near the confluence with
Lowery Creek. At a point roughly 150-200 feet downstream of pond#!, the unnamed tributary
converges with runoff from the railroad tracks and properties to the north and east of the pond along
West Mountain Road. About 800-900 feet downstream of pond #1, we observed one seep
discharging groundwater to the north bank of the unnamed tributary. There were several small
wetland areas extending for short distances along the north and south bank of the unnamed tributary,
which were too small in size to meet the minimum size restrcitions for a EPA jurisdictional wetland.
At 12:15, Mr. John Thomas identified the first EPA jurisdictional wetland located on an
unnamed tributary that connects pond #I of the Johnson Controls site to Lowery Creek. The wetland
begins approximately I 00 feet upstream of a power line crossing, and roughly 1500 feet downstream
of pond#!. The wetland appears to be continuous and contiguous along both sides of the tributary
and extends downstream from this point for about 500 feet to the confluence with Lowery Creek.
This wetland contains the dominant plant species of alder, river birch and sweet gum. The wetland
hydrology was created by an artificial boundary between a slightly meandering, channelized stream
to a broadened, triangularly-shaped, alluvial deposit, similar to a delta, that was apparently created
by a recession in flow due to the water elevation in Salem Lake. The primary wetland indicators of
saturated soils within the upper 12 inches, sediment deposits and drainage patterns within the
• •
wetlands. The soil exhibited a low chroma 1 0YR 4/1 hydric soil color. Mr. Thomas indicated that
this wetland would be classified as a palustrine scrub-shrub type.
From 12;20-12:50, we traced the drainage of the second unnamed tribtuary beginning at the
discharge below pond #3 and extending downstream to the power line crossing near the confluence
with Lowery Creek.
At 12:50, Mr. Thomas identified a second wetland located on an second unnamed tributary that
connects ponds #2 and #3 of the Johnson Controls site to Lowery Creek. The wetland begins
approximately 200 feet upstream of a power line crossing, roughly 900 feet downstream of pond #3.
The wetland appears to be continuous and contiguous along both sides of the tributary, extending
downstream from this point for about 500 feet to the confluence with Lowery Creek. This wetland
contains the dominant plant species ofred maple, green ash, sweet gum and downy dogwood, with
poison ivy and sensitive fem. The wetland hydrology was also created by an artificial boundary
between a slightly meandering, channelized stream to a broadened, triangularly-shaped, alluvial
deposit, similar to a delta, that was apparently created by a recession in flow due to the water
elevation in Salem Lake. The primary wetland indicators were saturated soils within 12 inches,
sediment deposits, drainage patterns within the wetlands and secondary indicators of oxidized
rhizospheres in the upper 12 inches. The soil exhibited a low chroma 1 0YR 4/1 hydric soil color.
Mr. Thomas indicated this would also be classified as a palustrine scrub-shrub type.
At 13 :30, Doug Moore and Stuart Parker departed the site for Raleigh.
~: .• :-,· .
-~~·~_;:~-(
·:,:-· ..
~r~
Jt(l~
. ~:·· .-.1' :·~:'.i
)j . -i· .,
.'· .
•
CONTENTS
PAGE NO. REFERENCE DATE
tkI;W\.
.·, ' . ~\;
-'-.··;_
-~, ~--.: ; ... ;: ::
' .~
··•.
•
•
I I
~----l I I i :
I _ia,,...~ :
I v , ,.,-Jli•~ i : .. +~. :.,l~•~··I . ':; . '·
/ I , ' I·
! I I
. . I .
' . '
.,
·; ·--:, i r, ,••. . ···r ' . , . .--~·:·-..._J ...... ?.· -. i
' J j ·..!\ ·I
i I '" :.i • ,,
I ,. . 1· .: ,-i '• I
L,1/4:. {(d,I I-... f-. Af1~~j . i·i;.:t·-1.1A. -1 ~ . . ,.:..,
' ' ' ' I " I I u 1~-L, -~uV,·tt--t..~~. r-~ ..
I 1 -'~l I J I .. -1' . I ~fI1fcri. A4 ,,_ !J ic.oi'l· ·-r • 7:0.J/?. .5~-. . I -I~ I• " . . • ,•
U ...)f. 1 ,. tJ, J .,\_ C I <!'iLf, A.!.--1 . o.L# i-M I iJ ! ( _I
~--, ... ,., kro• {~ ~,.(.jlz..A_•-
1
o~
/.Jr,,~ I a i,,C-t( .._Ii. I (h ... :,. J-./, • ..,,
f~' " I
I
A~ b,.J,v, .f'J.,4,-,c c,~ .,.,.
la ...,;~, U I .jJ_ I. i< IJcn!;.. . I ... ~ . 'l' I I I
fl·:· , i,,~J ,Wi f--.,41..\,. tt± l...l . •~' i,_ L.:,.J,,:..1.. ... cL.J I~
I . llJ. ~~-~.,. ;J~ .
~-I... I I I I 1 ·' I I i I _, J -roe. ,.., I~ c...,ll. '17»-.. l--..d'T
'I'~ 1t.. Ehr-,kf(,,_;j ~ I I I ! ~ ., fJ s•i"l.~ ~ I .
I I I I I I I I I n,V i~rfo..J i Je.. Ji Ii',.,( l..t Ji
~1,1 * , . .I .... ~ t:L ~~;.,f--~~ ... ~ ~ -• ,. ,. ! « \!u,.., viwt . l,ird,-
. ·1 I ~~,( .... -I
D ,J.~i>II • flt if..,. ,l.. h I., .I i
I I
I 'Z)1~ !
I i (,!'11,
-I I ' :
I
___ L "'_fl:Ja__--l--=-"'~--+---
! '
I I i i OJ I ~-0 ~ t ~11 ~.~ ~ --f' ,,.._
I I 't»l I
i. !
;
' 7'1 lz.·:v ~ ,6,:, '1"' ~]"P 'i;O-
-"' I ' I i 1fr ueS. e.~"'1 -J,+>i 'Jr al -1)'1
i -i . i I
I I ~ :s1w "'.'l 1'"'1-i
I i I" ~f ti· ?t.-~-
. . . . I -r"& "1 . -I I
~ I '. .
I I I J I
\ . -:~~r.;ir-, r",.. ~! •ti , .. ' . I I J__l_j__
I ! ... •, . .·•I . '.1 -L:_; : ·rr~·<1 t"<11 ', .,~
..... 1, 1:7~5 'it+' 'r'EJ '[~ ~ . 'I I I , I . -. 1 l/"'f"'1' t"' Jr>'j' i" '7>7("-t,., I I ..!---"
'2-. -r-i":J -1 ':If · M'I rfP I) r--:-~' ZI fitf' ,I I I I --~\ n i'/J•). j""JJi-J-·-.,. r,-1;.q ,,4' 01'
I I • I
I . ~ ""'ifl. i ?-r1 I I .! I
~:f--
-• i\»-·· ,, ·-·1 -.-.-.-~ ··_ r-· · _.,.,_.··1 --..... ·:· \-
-·,! ·-i-•• .. , ,,,,..._,.G.~~• _-•~c
•
11/-IJI ;; , \Q1 ' / ~ '"~
·• I I ,·
. · -I l I • -. 1""
-vag-~-iuqt'-"~-~r "" ~-l7-u1~-I I I ' . I I J· 'i' I C
I fFr lt_ :r"'Y _i'.i.n~ .. ry, 1-~-i
I I "'i r'i'r'1 Li4Jfrrf[":J-fJ r"'~ I
. 'I .I,_ I
!
I
.·'
[ )<7 / cr•'d I I
! I I I
Action ID: 199700928
•
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
County: Forsyth
Notification of Jurisdictional Dete.rmination
RECEIVED
JUL 101997
Property owner/Authorized Agent: North Carolina Superfund Section c/o DouWJ~li}jl'5'blhJD SECTION
Address: 401 Oberlin Road, Suite 150, Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Telephone Number: (919) 733-280 I ext. 315
Size and Location of Property (waterbody, Highway name/num,ber, town, etc.): Superfi.md site
near the Johnson Controls facility located off of.. West Mountain Stree.t, adjacept to Lowery Mill
Creek, near Winston,Salem,-in F9rsyth County,J~ort.h.Caroliria., ·,;, 1,, "•', . . -
Indicate-Which of the following-~pply: · . . . ..(. .
X * There are wetlands on the aboxe qescribed_.property which,;we strongly.suggest.sli9uld be
delineated and surveyed .. The surveyed wetland lines must be verified by our staff before
the Corps will make a final jurisdictional determination on your property. Concur with
the ide111ificatio11 ofiurisdictio11al sites as 011tli11ed bv vour provided map dated J1111e 4. I 997.
• Because of the size of your property and our present workload, our identification and
delineation of your wetlands cannot be accomplished in a timely manner. You may wish
to employ a consultant to obtain a more timely delineation of the wetlands. Once your
consultant has flagged a wetland line on the property, Corps staff will review it, and, if it
is accurate, we strongly recommend that you have the line surveyed for final approval by
the Corps. The Corps will not make a final jurisdictional determination on your property
without an approved survey.
• The wetlands on your lot have been delineated, and the limits of Corps jurisdiction have
been explained to you. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed three years from the date
of this notification.
• There are no wetlands present on the above descrjb~d p~ope_rty_.which a_re subject to the
permit requirements ofSection.404ofthe Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there
.. is a change, in the)aw or ou~ p~blished regulati~~s, this ·det;r~;in;tiori ~ay be-~eli~d upon
for a period:n~tJo.exc·eed .three years from th_e. date 9f this notification.
* Th~,project is iocatedjn one of the 20.Coastal, Cou_nties .. )!. OU should ,contacr the nearest_
State Office of Coastal Manag~ment to determine their.requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material in wetlands on this property without a Department of the
Army permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311).
A permit is not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high ground. If
you have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact
. John T. Thomas, Jr. , / . / a/t · [phone], Extension 25
Project Manager Signature: /Ji_ ), ').J:;_ . . .
Date: 7 July 1997 {' ' Expiration Date: 7 July 2002
SURVEY PLAT OR FIELD SKETCH OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE
WETLAND DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE YELLOW (FILE)
COPY OF THIS FORM.
State of North Car~a
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
Mr. John Thomas
United States Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Subj.: Wetland Identification
June 4, 1997
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
US EPA ID: NCD 000 770 487
Dear Mr. Thomas:
DEHNR
Attached are copies of a National Wetland Inventory Map for the Winston-Salem East
Quadrangle and an aerial photograph showing the approximate location of the two wetland areas you
. identified on June 3, 1997 along two unnamed tributaries connecting the subject site to Lowery Mill
Creek.
The first wetland is located on an unnamed tributary that connects pond # I of the Johnson
Controls site to Lowery Creek. The wetland begins approximately I 00 feet upstream of a power line
crossing, and roughly 1500 feet downstream of pond#!. The wetland appears to be continuous and
contiguous downstream from this point to the confluence with Lowery Creek. This wetland contains
the dominant plant species of alder, river birch and sweet gum. The wetland hydrology was a small
meandering slightly channelized stream that slows down causing the channel to spread due to
laminar flow, with primary wetland indicators of saturated soils within the upper 12 inches, sediment
deposits and drainage patterns within the wetlands·. The soil exhibited a low chroma I OYR 4/1
hydric soil color. You indicated that this wetland would be classified as a palustrine scrub-shrub
type.
The second wetland is located on an second unnamed tributary that connects ponds #2 and
#3 of the Johnson Controls site to Lowery Creek. The wetland begins approximately 200 feet
upstream ofa power line crossing, roughly 900 feet downstream of pond #3. The wetland appears
to be continuous and contiguous downstream from this point lo the confluence with Lowery Creek.
This wetland contains the dominant plant species of red maple, green ash, sweet gum and downy
· dogwood, with poison ivy and sensitive fern. The wetland hydrology was a small meandering
slightly channelized stream that slows down causing the channel to spread due to laminar flow, with
primary wetland indicators of saturated soils within 12 inches, sediment deposits, drainage patterns
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Tei<:;phone 91q. 73.3.4996 FAX 9i9-7 l 5-3605
An Equal Opportunity Affim,otive /-..ction ~m/Jloy,;n
Letter to Mr. Thomas
June 4, 1997
Page 2.
• •
within the wetlands and secondary indicators of oxidized rhizospheres in the upper 12 inches. The
soil exhibited a low chroma I 0YR 4/1 hydric soil color. You indicated this would also be classified
as a palustrine scrub-shrub type.
When you have completed your wetland determination form, please send it to:
Douglas Moore
NC Superfund Section
401 Oberlin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
I enjoyed meeting with you and sincerely appreciate your time and cooperation in this project.
If you have any further questions, please contact me at [phone], ext. 315.
attachments
cc: File
2
Sincerely,
Douglas Moore
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
•
"LANDS. INVENTORY
'~ . -. . . '
'ARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR.
1os·vu .. L£ 37 Ml.
. .• ·-. ' ,· ... 1,·-...
·· ,. ££NSEJORO :n Ml.
cs·DALC ,_. M1. .
NE'RSV/LLC. of.IM
•~~~r-iz~C'-,-~=~+'c"-,'--,--;-,,,--:,,-s==
-
l
r
c
-
-
n
,
-
-
c
-
s
,
c
,
i
.
-
,
s
.
-
,
;
-
-
,
l
,
-
.
,
,
-
,
m
,

ti~·
·~ .
;?,:i;,: /,"\,,
'. \: .
·,' >->
(/,
';
' -~)" ·:, ; __ 1\~~-
~-:.._,,._ . --=-.. '-... , ., ' : .·'.'.
"-~ /.
\ • L -.,,.
/t_. .. ~
_@3,.;
-c ... _·-::.;;,-;
,. . ~·
r· ;/~~\\ • • • ~
•; '-,;--,-, .. =11~ ··1 • / :(: .•
//..-. -oo . . : . . .. . \ •, -·. , . -..
.
. . I / ' .• .,,,__~,.-' ~ " 1 '• -4 • • • • {
,_.
<(:->·\\., ·\.:_~~> ~-~ ~~ ,~ ---,, ~. • ~=, ,, · _,-~;··:,.,<1.,.0. . .. \.)~r~·,
'1"'1 !.-;· ··; ,·.i.'C \ ', ·l• 1I· \
\ '"·
, '1 ,,, ';., I '-._,,
• ~\. • -•'
I "
:.,/~2~,. '· \:: . : 'i.;:-. :, '• " --~--· :• \:\;ii: ·''--""""" · •:' . '\'•·I •. · 1 • P\j;.\.\
\\\, \>,, .. • ... --,;--;.·)\--,'• • >i\'·>• • ~ \~I• , '\• • .... I,, ~ii• : ,,' \'\ I ",, • ~.
11'' _,,1)•'·"1---·:,\' ' \::.\ ,_ I" jl.J/,-90·-~:,-,:,' .J;.'"'~ ·P,rl-,·
•• /• '/' ~/•-=•1•( \ ';;\ I \ 1 \\ '\ '-,~ '\\ 0...../·.:·-:' 1 • II ,\
...,, ,(i. 0 , __ ... , ,6,j : (1 , c, '}I "\-.\' :,.,,. l , .. •I/ I\\' . c·
':>.>-r, ~ ,. ,:;,o / t-:-:-::)-11 -r' ,1:. ~ • ,·_q-,::_ . ··-: \ ••• -~1 · '''r~ --.,_::,11( '. ' ,•=-;'4~) ' ':\ '('. \~
,t;..-··:(' ··:·. :, J_;i '~--tit~:.'•;:!!·. : 1-s:~ ·. 'T-°' '"·,.-}--~~\>· ·.,·. . 1 ::.!,(""\i r,•.. 1·.\'::--,;,-
~~;~··,) ·1; ·.: .-,··'.~~t~t·: ~,;1•:r ·• \.' . : '. /: .·.·:-: ;vt:· ('0"~:: m·• .. ,,:11' . ::1/,,~,l\",r ~-•;'·~-
l,i--' . ·=•· .•. • O ·• .. '· '• . ~ l:',L ··: .. ~ lllr '., , : I' ·.'· I ,,. •• .. : : :i1ll \ .. , ,.,··. ;,.,:·-,,.I''--•~: ., ,,~·, ' ..
) . •'-',,ou,-•v,·, ·,-.<"-"" ·-~-ae!~,--~,<:-·,I ;;:,; I ..... I •• ,('·' ' •• l\· ~•'I,' ·(~ (l,,, .·,~G
_1 r.,.__,.._,1,n" ; , .._.'l-"·~:' • .·•·.•,~•• ~~ • ,.•;_.i .•• ~,/,1•'' ,,1• , ,.,, i l r)' ,,.,,./.,'
.:-r, , ' .. , -r ,..-...~.· ·.,',. ' J, ,j . . .. \l, ·t·· ~-""'-., , , \' , , .,1· " '\''• 11,'". ,i' ·e'•~' , ,
-~(;1 '., "•l'JJ. ,·\ -:.:. •..: ... : '.ll }'; ''\,/!-;..,.·.,,. ---., '/,,':,✓-\ '.,i ,~--·\' \''·· !'1 -·· -~
1 \..,._• ',-..~ ,'n)·\L.--:-,.. ,:;,-..~,•::Pi;,//''-:-"__'{: :-: ,~'!,,'·.,, ( ·_.,','/ . "r!·~",, \''\\I\'.·\\:-, ~\-•
D·"---.cJil,. . .. •·.···•. I .· 1 , . ...,✓._ ,..,. ' .. 1r·1 •• !_,'ii. J· ✓ ._.;; .. \
,. ········~· -··.·1• :::· ... ,1,\:_:]?rff~.r:· .. F./-" .. ;?:::
' • ''j·
.,:'·' .,
•• '. if~.
,a1 , ,I
'. .'
'
+ )/!!,{ .. /);».; ,,,,
, . .-( .. -~'~ '·W· ; ,''
'i-\.oJ'
' ' -:,,'/
'('
'r
'
(
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICUL.
Soil Conservation Service
Hydric codes (HC):
Vegetation codes (YC):
HYDRIC SOILS
.Technical Guide
Section II-A-2
June 1991
Forsyth County, North Carolina
l •
2 •
3 •
l •
Hydric soils, only because of saturation for a
significant period during the growing season;
Hydric 3oils that are frequently flooded for long or
ver¥ long periods during the growing season; and
Hydric soils that are ponded for long or very long
peri eds d_uri ng the growing season.
Hydric soils that support woody vegetation under
natural conditions; and
2 ~ Hydric soils that do not support woody vegetation under
natural conditions.
IMPORTANT NOTES: (1) Hydric soils in this county cannot be farmed under natural conditions
without removing woody vegetation or hydrology manipulation. {2) Some map units and included sails
listed as hydric soils in this county may not meet the definition of hydric soils and wetlands because
the hydrology has been altered through drainage or other manipulations.
A. Map units that are a(I hydric soils or have hydric soils as a major component.
Map Unit
S)mbO l
Wh
HC VC Map Unit Name
\Jehadkee soils
B. Map units with inclusions of hydric soils or have wet spots.
Map Unit
Symbol Map Unit Name
Ch Chewacla loam
Hydric
Inclusion
\Jehadkee
HC YC
Normal location
Inclusion
Base of slope and depressions
' ,'
Cl04839.DAT
Public Water Supply Database Printout (04/25/97)
Johnson Controls -Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, NC
US EPA ID: NCD 000 770 487
Latitude: 36/02/30 to 30/11/00 Longitude: 80/05/00 to 80/14/00
/0234010 WINSTON-SALEM, CITY OF C 220000 9107278418 SALEM/THOMAS
V0234025 WALKERTOWN, TOWN-OF C 1371 9105954212 WELL #1 PINEHAL
0234025 WALKERTOWN, TOWN OF C 1371 9105954212 WELL #4 JONES
0234025 WALKERTOWN, TOWN OF C 1371 9105954212 WELL #5 SHIRLEY
v'0234125 GREEN ACRES MOBILE COURT C 40 WELL #1
0 2 3 414 5 SHADY-GR0VE-T-P·---------e·----2:3-9r0 98:3·2-S·76-WEbb-
/o234l65 YORKTOWN S/D C 274 8005257990 WINSTON-SALEM
0 2 3 4 18 2 6RM'·ST0NE--F0RRB-S'I'-WA'l'ER-S¥S'l'EM-G----320-9.10.6 65 081.7-WELLS
0 2 3 4 18 2 GR:A¥STeNE-F0RRES'I'-WA'FE·R-S:Y.&T-EM-3-2-0-9-1-06-650-8-l-+-WEbI.S-
0234183 SMOKERISE WA'l'ER SYS'l'EM C 16fl-9-1-0-6·6·50-8-1-7-W.Ebb--#·l
0 2 3 4 18 3 SMGKER-I-SE-WA'.I'.ER-S:Y:S.T.E,1•1------'----___J..o..0-9.Ul.6,Ei5,0,&-l~ 2
0 2 3 418 3 SMOKER-J;.SE-WA'.I'.ER-S:Y:S-'J.!EM G -6-0-9-1-06-6-5-0-8-1--7-W.Ehb--#4-
0234182 GRAYSTONE FORREST WATJ;;~ £'££.'FEM C 320 91066508) 1 WEJ.T, 3
023418 9 K-¥NWOQ.rbJ....-------------1c,------z!-H-9-'!,G-6-G5 0 817 HELL #-1
0234189 K~Y~~~~~JO)OlY----------------e----
0234191 ABINGTON 8/D G
G
0234191 ADHI~N~G~'l'~O~t~i~Sq+J:l-----------l''-----
0234191 A1r[-~~,G~'l'~O~~~l-8o+/~D----------~-'----
0234191 AB-~NG'I'-0N-&fD•----------i:'----
0234191 AB~NGTGN-&-J-D-----------e----
0234444 MRS AVA PRUITT
0234455 UNION CROSS BAPT CH
0234458 HOUSE & GROUNDS COMM
0234460 FRIEDLAND MORAVIAN CHURCH
N
N
N
N
213 910G6-50817 WELL #2 -
·8·6-8-0-0-5-z-5-9-9·9-0-WEf,b-#'I.
98·0-8-0-G-5-2-5-7--9-9-0-W.Ehb-#-3·
98-0-8-0-0-5-2-5-7-9-9.0-WEI.b-#4-
980-8·005·2·5"1·9·90-WEbb-6-
9·8·0-8-00-5-2·5-9·9-9-0-WEhb-9-
250 9107679815 WELL
32 9107692862 WELL
60 9107889068 WELL
73 9107882652 WELL
Page 1
s p 360530.000 801145.000
G p 361035.000 801010.000
G p 361025.000 801020.000
G p 361040.000 801030.000 • ·G p 360935.000 801030.000
G p 361045.000 801355. 000-0Ji->\cU 'r.,,; R.,,J.ia$
p p 360530.000 801145.000
G p 360945.000 8 0 0 515 . 0 0 0 -ov/~1',\,, 4-..,; {<c..,u'v!,
G p 360945.000 8 0 0 515 . 0 0 0 -ovf-s,o,, q-w; (?c,J,.·v!>
G p 360930.000 8 0 0 5 2 5 . 0 0 0 -OJ½i(.,,.. 4-.,.. (<,.J, vs
G p 360930.000 8 0 0 5 21 . 0 0 0 -o,t,/;._ <I-....,· ~k,i-,,1 ' ,I.,·
G p 360930.000 800528. 000-o,r.lJ,.q v-v,
G p 361005.000 800530. 000 -Ov/-,/1--~ lhl'P.,,J_/q,
G p 361020.000 800540. 000-u•KIJ-1 ~.: e.J.1,,
1,,·-1<" ' R_,,;.,,,, ' G p 361025.000 800540.000-0•' ':°''
G p 360957.100 800557. 600-oJ;il. <h,.,., f/.c.,1.,Jv'
G p 361005.400 800552.100-'' ''
G p 361007.600 800551. 600 -". I' '.
G p 360937.700 800538 .100 -" IL
,,
G p 360936.400 800539. 700 -,. "
G p 360935.000 801220.000
G p 360240.000 800640.000
G p 360445.000 800945.000
G p 360345.000 800950.000
C104839.DAT
0234463 CHRIST WESLEYAN CH N 60 9104544630 WELL G p 360250.000 801040.000
0234470 C D SELLS GROCERY N 200 9107692025 WELL G p 360350.000 800735.000
0234470 C D SELLS GROCERY N 200 9107692025 WELL G p 360350.000 800735.000
0234470 C D SELLS GROCERY N 200 9107692025 WELL G p 360350.000 800735.000
0234470 C D SELLS GROCERY N 200 9107692025 WELL G p 360350.000 800735.000
0234471 WELCOME DOOR BAPTIST CH N 123 9108896101 WELL G p 361100.000 800600.000
0234567 BEREAN BAPTIST CHURCH p 75 9107850527 WELL G p 360230.000 801110.000
0234574 KERNERSVILLE LAKE PARK N 75 9107272946 WELL #1 G p 360910.000 800600.000
Water Supply System: Water Supply Source:
C Community s Surface Water
N = Non-Community G Groundwater
p = Private
Page 2
Memorandum
Date: May 12, 1997
To:
From:
Subj.:
File
4~ Douglas Moore
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
Onsite Reconnaissance
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
US EPA ID: NCO 000 770 487
•
On Thursday, May 8, 1997, Doug Moore and Doug Rumford of the NC Superfund Section traveled
to the subject site to meet with company representatives and tour the Johnson Controls site, in
preparation for an expanded site inspection sampling trip. We arrived at the site around 11 :00 am
and met with Chris Fisher, Process and Environmental Engineer, and Jim DiBiagio, Technical
Manager.
Mr. DiBiagio provided us with a brief outline of the plant operation. The main operation consists
of assembling automotive batteries from parts produced on and off the site. The batteries are housed
in polypropylene casings that are shipped to the plant. The lead cell plates are produced from lead
bars that are shipped to the site by truck, melted down in furnaces and cast into plates. The grids
connecting each plate are coated with a lead oxide paste produced in lead oxide mills located at the
plant. Sulphuric acid is shipped to the plant by rail and stored onsite in above-ground storage tanks.
The sulphuric acid is added to the batteries following assembly of the lead plates and grids. The
plant recently expanded including construction of new plant buildings and a 4 shift, 7-day a week
operation that employs 630 employees. The plant capacity will produce between I 4,000-22,000
batteries/day at full production.
The wastewater treatment process used at the plant consists of neutralization using sodium
hydroxide, ferrous sulfate precipitation, lamella screens for large particles and filtration through a
filter press. The subsequent filter cake is shipped offsite as a RCRA D008 solid and recycled by a
smelter. Any floor sweepings and clothing from the WWTP are collected and shipped offsite as
hazardous waste. The treated wastewater is then either recycled back through the operation (in the
case of the lead oxide mill), or discharged to the city of Winston-Salem sewer.
According to Mr. Fisher, the primary source of contaminants identified in surface runoff comes from
air emissions from the lead oxide mill and plant furnace. The plant has large capacity bag filtersthat
employ gore-lex bags to trap the particulates. He stated that the bag filters trap over 99% of the air
emissions. However, some of the smaller entrained particulates escape the bag filters and eventually
settle to surface soils and building roofs. During heavy rain events, the particulates are then picked
• •
up in sheet flow runoff from the plant. The runoff is directed to the west and southwest where it is
retained in three sedimentation basins to allow the particulates to settle out before being discharged
to an unnamed tributary of Lowery Mill Creek. Mr. Fisher stated that the plant operates the
stormwater sedimentation basins under a general NPDES stormwater discharge permit No.
NCG030224. The permit states that they have to collect samples of the plant runoff and have it
tested for specific metals and parameters. The samples are collected following storm events, at a
frequency of three times within a five year period. Last December, the plant collected replicate
aqueous samples of stormwater runoff from two of the basins.
Mr. Fisher allowed us to review a copy of the report they submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management detailing the results of the December 1996 stormwater discharge
sampling event. Two of the three basins had sufficient flow to sample, and Mr. Fisher collected two
samples to represent the typical runoff from the plant into each of the two basins. The results were
then averaged and reported to DEM. The first sample, called Site 2, was collected from a splash pad
directly upgradeint of basin 2, about one hour after a storm event. Site 2 receives runoff from the
main operational part of the building adjacent to the air emission stacks. The average lead
concentration of the two samples was reported at 55 ug/l, average zinc concentration at 240 ug/l, and
average iron concentration at 336 ug/l. The second sample, called Site 3, was also collected from
a splash pad immediately upgradient of basin 3, about one hour after a storm event. Site 3 receives
runoff from the battery storage, and battery assembly operations on the north side of the facility. The
average lead concentration was< 5.0 ug/l, the average zinc concentration was 120 ug/l, and the
average iron concentration was I. 779 mg/!.
When asked, both Mr. Fisher and Mr. DiBiagio stated that there was a spill at the plant last year.
The spill was caused by a leaking valve located in a distribution line connecting the above-ground
sulphuric acid tanks with a sulphuric acid/water blending area. The spill was relatively small and
was contained within a 20 square foot area. The plant remediation consisted of neutralizing the
contaminated soil with sodium hydroxide. No soil was removed from the spill. The spill was not
reported. There are currently no monitoring wells located on the site property.
From 11 :50-12:35, Doug Moore, Doug Rumford, Chris Fisher and Jim DiBiagio toured the three
sedimentation basins southwest of the facility. The ponds are relatively small in size (covering about
1-2 acres total), and have been recently re-excavated. The dams had been reconstructed with a large
diameter vertical overflow pipe to drain water from the top of the basin through the base of the dam,
discharging into the unnamed tributary. Each dam appeared to be stable and had been recently
reseeded. There was little or no standing water behind each of the dams. No odors, oily sheens or
stained soils were visible in any of the three basins. Since the basins had been re-excavated, there
was no vegetation present at any of the three basins.
We departed the site at 13:00 and conducted a windshield survey of water use in the vicinity of West
Mountain Road, Walkerton Road, and Willamont Roads within a 0.25 mile radius of the site.
Several large diameter bored wells were visible in front of houses along West Mountain Road.
However, all of these houses are currently connected to the city of Winston-Salem municipal water
system. The nearest residence that was still using a groundwater well for drinking water was located
at the former Henly Pettycord residence at 309 Walkerton Road. This house is currently occupied
• •
by Mr. Powell Pettycord, who confirmed that the well was a bored well about 24 inches in diameter,
about 15-20 feet depth to the groundwater table.
At 13:50, we checked with an employee of A&E Industries, a small machine shop located near the
entrance to the Johnson Controls site, who confirmed that the business as well as several others
along West Mountain Road were connected to the city of Winston-Salem system. This includes a
vacant property located at the entrance to Johnson Controls Road, formerly occupied by St. Clair
motors, as well as Associated Posters (see inset map in field notes for locations).
At 14:00, Mrs. Christine Cox at the adminsitrative office confirmed that East Forsyth High School
was connected to the city of Winston-Salem municipal water system. She indicated that East
Forsyth High School has approximately 1,300 students and 135 employees.
At 14:30, we drove to the City Hall, downtown Winston-Salem, to review the water line maps and
tax records for properties adjacent to the site. We met with Mr. Steve Dulin of the Engineering
Department, who provided us with a map showing the water lines within a 0.25 mile radius of the
site and the properties that were connected to the system (see Map 1 attached). Mr. Dulin also
provided a map and printout for the property owners immediately adj cent and west of the Johnson
Controls facility.
At 15 :00, we departed Winston-Salem for Raleigh.
_ __.,_'!SL:/zC-"7,/-;'lc.::Oc:c, -_,Nc:s..<.C~' ~"'-""c.:...+-~-;..-~-+I ___ 1
~ .· I· _ .. ,-Lt, I _; .>v.e I . / ,,
I . '332--w,,.,k.----6i'v~"'-/11,t
'lc4,iJ.., ~s-I .el~!.., i -(;l.,J..
1,.u,Lc>J '-,_ ,::o -1. c.,.l..1. IIC I ~ -
0'11 'I I .r-?J I • I ti).• w,..,., t>CO ~7[
I I
,.,I I I I• I ,,. .,._ ~ ..... rssa-,c-e. -,
• Jf-7, .. 1.-v IF I I
>r-s M /'l'l 7,, . I
'7 ~-'. I I . 1~ . ' 17J . . ' . ' I
'
,I I J.z_ i 'II n,o ,
ar --.Jr f~ a/.-; a,,,., -
do~ ~f.r.LI ,._ 1-,,..(11 .;_.....,..t< ~ hr d:__ ;
~,ii:. I .
I I I i
I I I , z I
I I 1/1
I I 7
!
I ·k I ! I I . I I (". .n ~ £1 . n 7'.'B,t~ -, CT.; t,-,/ ,t;:i s ·-' ·"'-Ii
,/ ·~ r,_ ' ... ! A,: .. ,,, cok.' l,,. I">,,. -
I u ! . ' '
I
L-' 1/. i· ' . s ·-1 :, . .. ,r. ·~,.. --.,,e,o
. I I I I I I I I i I i •
7), ~ .. j'"•f -w,_,v, :z;....._~/4-..,13.ffiL-
.... , 1• -1 c.! .... } I ...... I _ 1 A-,~ . , lu ?L-J c.... L I',.,/. u. ..,,
:.£ •. ...1.-I l ,; f y ,I I-,,,(, i.. • .. .
I I I
I I
I I
' .1 >A'lvc-t ,-.J. I ' I I,_, ~~ '.,..
,~ ✓ I 1·1,1, .J, I kl -/,'--~ Dlr ~ '-'.
-, _ _I lr~~~-,~L &o_ ~=<k_/l , ~ J.i. 1,s I .....!.....,.(,,.o,i-{ ,Ji ft.< J,,J,;.
's: ,/ I · ld.Jsfd J; I, ~ . ••,, • "" I ~-~,., • ,,.,, if ,, -· -«,,,.f ~ ~,,,.,
. •.·
, ... ,
.~ ' , •... ~
:::: ··.~t:
":;··,~t
:~.:~:/ ~
'~'. :it ·;, ! I
I
I "
I
I
I I
I I
I I . I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i ·I
I
I I
:/
/l
I/ i y
I /i
i/ I I
/ i I
.i/ I i
/I I I
' I .
,
-----+---+'-I __ j___..........J__~--5/41,
I
w!c.-) -i.n , ~ t,,. .1~ J_}.L J.JL I;_ / t-w -·-· -V I 1+f9 I ~ . -· ·teeo s.._· wdf-"-'-p!.J/,,... ~ ---i=--c Pl r.,,.,..__ I -. " uJ_ l«,I ~ .. · I ~ ,A
'-l --''-. •!,._ 1 -I '1a ?
0
, ,.:.,J{ • I
I i I
-"--<> .Mk!' 's ,,,.., I~
I • . V
.A I l..c.. / [. !...A
' ~-1.--..i.. ~-,;:.
"·~ -~ bl,,,,,1-,,f, k-~ , __ 14:4r-H~
,L l..L ) I I I I I I ~--i,'t.,... I ~ ./~Pl"'--f"" I .!. I ,I·, .(,Ji 'II I) .I !·" tS-Vi~ s=e,ty_
. -I ·-I. -1 ,£. I
I I I
' 1-),0 I I I I .At, -i!.;'3-., -.J-!. ,..._ LI r/h ~ 1 °k. ~~r •
.,.-IC,,. I ~<-H-'+11 +.J:~~i.f¾-t r , .. ,·
<:, ,,.
_..!.~ _f.1.._t-<4 ill I ~7-1 !,;; 'r:..
I , .J ·~--i. . ~ .. J .,k-11¥,:1~.
I I ~-~A: I 'W I •Lt. -,I -h., .
"Pw,, 1b fl,, 'h• -,,,LJ-1 .. -L·"+~J.
,_,Lt, --J w I o4J..J.4 I , ' 1,0. • ,.,_.
r-J. 1,: < ,,~L h1h i.. I I . I-. I I I..<
k... ,_A_,· rL1L.1 1•1,1 • k,<krJ' -,u
.:... I ...,,r •
~(,. I .I ' U _.,,. l ,--, .. ~ 17v' Sf"St.;u, . -ls c-
~ 4--:t-L~ !!;J . J~ Ru u .J 71 / I 'I' I' ~~ nlc [ilh-~tM• V .
• ,-,--···--~-.. -· ..
I I
I I I I !
I
1---\-~"'-1--""i"-'-'"+---',~"--=F-'-j-~ -I
~~•~'--'P'-+--~c-R-==+---of ~I -I
-lk.i,r-r--::r1 /__ __ fo,_1 ---t-------i
.I
-_ ......... ,.---~------
;Ji'i~tit
. >: ::::.. ?:,;.;~Jf'
•}?} ·/'.:-;i
. ____ ..1,....,._,_.,..,__ .•• f
·~~jf, -------
J--~ 1---"'
-----.----
? I -,kl ' I
·vn 'J~ L<'s7 1 •~~II# w ,, /I
:I"'>'!-'
1,,,1,ffi, ~ ..vv w· ~~ -1-c/'w -: ,rJ
I I~' i I
a, . ~n.,,,,, -w ·, ,_ i" I~ ~ ii"i-'1 ·-i ·r1 -
1,.0 '-"o/~'"'""v..,,~71' I ~.;1 ·1, ~~-r1r I , I _!__ : l J
·;rj,J ;5'!7 3'~' •~ 7f7"·7· · no;./,/ I , , , 1 1 1 I . I I f;!,~ 'ff"' 1 YIM M-'f..-/ r%--
#I I 4r. I I I. __:~~ I '"'r .. ~ i"' 'i" .,,,r
~ ., ~ J ..., V 7.,n,-r-ry
I ·r~
'·
~ 'fl',71 u, K . /l'J . I : I I /f:'2..-V, ...f'
'tr bo,1 I 7 I T/"?'l' T" "' >" p7ff •
-~ rt1' o/' ..,,, 'rr,7 •• . 'lfr"'r1 <LI , I
3.3'1' 1/"
I
,-'(7 v~ rw ,'I--051:2.
'
. . . "t ,/ / 7 ~ 1·' -I
i. V t 1' "f :.f / .i:,, , I .1;,f' i"-z:
/(' I ~ I ~ I. rytf 1P?1f/Y,
-6!J~);1 tr ,,~ 1 I ✓ iTW T-lj
'-?'7nYt4 },..l,1ru-I I I I I • I I • I
i I I I I i
, _ 1
I I ~) I
I I i ;;-l' I
• ' For
-r,
1i---,.i.....,........,...,.,.,.,.1,,.,. r i-1
::,
•
un
.. I~ __.;/-'.'.·L,· In~ lf'r!/t"IJii'i1:J::::l , / . . ~ r---
./ :-._,"-;' ~"'1l ~ -
_J_J (,~~)
... ~ ,1,_,
). ~
, . . ', l ,
0.54 1.08 Miles
~~~~~~~~~~~~iiiiiiiii,
0 0.54
D Prelim ext corridor
Pl East Belt
Text Road Names
Text Misc Anno
j\/ Streams
j\/ Floodplains
j\/ Railroads
j\/ Road Centerlines
/\/ Private Roads D Parcels
N
s
•
Report Printed on: Thursday,May 8,1997
Block Lot
3256 010
3260 102B
3256 009C
3256 009D
Property Owner
Property Address
CREWSOTISW
002771 W MOUNTAIN ST
KERNERSVILLE NC 27284
000000 MOUNTAIN ST
CITYOFWS
000000 REAL ESTATE
WINSTON-SALEM NC 27101
000000 SALEM LAKE RD
CREWS ALLEN J
003790 HIGH POINT RD
WINSTON-SALEM NC 27107
000000 MOUNTAIN ST
CREWSOTISW
002771 W MOUNTAIN ST
KERNERSVILLE NC 27284
002771 WEST MOUNTAIN ST
•
Federal !
~iip Notification & Authorizatio
Prepared by: ?>. /Vl ,:,.off!£ Today's Date: :r--.2 o -9 7
·t.:se Ol:.ick Ink or Typcwri1cr on!y-Siaff to fill out first:? blocks only.
Site Trip-
Date of Trip: JVtv€ 3, /99 7 I
If trip date changed or cancelled note below:
Trip Date Changed To: Cancelled: --
NCO#: ao 7?o %"7 Site Name: ::Jblh..J~IV CON "FRDQ', -Gc:,c,/J, c f3,,_rrE 'o/ City: {A/1A.J m A/ ->Jl:(..0t,,. County: Fiu .. ~<tT?f=
Reason for Trip: Wt:T'-kN/J '7!€C.(Nt;lff?OA/ -OFF SrTF ,eF e,o,v,u,41 S S,tW~
e XI' 11-N t> en <:;1 TE , "'sPeC77orv
Name of Hotel (Overnight Trip): Hotel Telephone Number: ( ) .. -
Authorized by: -~el/!.
Project Team Leader: 7)0(;€, ~
Assistants: ~<.16, /20~,e..l) , ,
Attach To Notification Form: I copy each: Preliminary Assessment Form (First page only)
Submit to the Site Map
Industrial Hygienist PA Transmittal Letter
(Please list appropriate County Health Department contact person m call to advise of trip) D ·; r eoC l,:,r, /J,:,.
' Environmental Supervisor or Health Director to call: fnr. &"' ,/ Q.,e,9if.:eC
'
Tit I e : & f Z-nv. JI ea-t!4,
Notes:
(Note if Dr., M.I'., etc.)
Telephone Number: (710) 7:J'.7 • ;;;_ 7e, c,
Health Department Official Contacted: . /fir-, rreJ Over;>f,ee(-
Back Up Letter Required: Yes / No -----/1).:;+rf: <-.J /hr. CVe1 ,freef ,-,.'-..s-;-19-17 (ML J
/
Note: Signed original to Data Man.i~cr
"
JOHNSON CONTROLS . C.
SLI BATTERY'DIVIs~oN
2701 JOHNSON CONTROLS DRIVE P.O. BOX 1667
KERNERSVILLE.NC 27285
WINSTON-S.Al.~M SITE MAP LEGEND
' .
REVISION• C •. DATF' 2/7/94
,-----------------
' TOTAL ACREAGE= 75 17 '
BUILDING AREA = 7 .4 ACR.ES' · .),1 c,;J·_ ... '
PARKING LOTS. DRIVES= 9 ACRES
\
I
½.
WOODS
? ?
TRAILER PARKING ASPHALT
½.
½.
/
,r-r--
½.
WOODS
\ ~
?
ACID UNLOAD POINT
BATTERY
STORAGE
FACILITY
RD RD RD
CONCENTRATED ACID STORAGE
ACID MIXING BUILDING
WOODS
METAL
WOOD RECYCLING
ASPHALT ACCESS DRIVE
COMPACTOR
'...EAD OXIDE IJNLOAO POINT
?
?
?
GRAVEL
V\/'-
/
/
WOODS
!
BATTERY SHIPPING DOCK
COMPACTOR
GRASS D
LOADING D & TRUCK NEW STORAGE PALLETS
AREA
TRAILER MAINT
SEDIMENTATION WOODS BASINS ? SP
BASINS
/
POLY RECEIVING
LEAD RECEIVING LEAD SCRAP SHIPPING
CAUSTIC UNLOAD POINT
PIPE~~-SEOIM~ATION
------.L ~ V\/'-
WOODS
\ @) SWALE
\
TREES ~
GRASS
WOODS "-1...
V\... 'V\,.
WOODS
PROPANE FILL POINT
LP TANKS
~
SP
V\... 1z.
'--z.
WOODS
WOODS
SEDIMENTATION BASINS
.,-v--. SHEET
*
RUNOFF
STORM SEWER
LOCATION WHERE STORMWATER LEAVES PROPERTY
CATCH BASIN
--0-MANHOLE
---0-SEALED MANHOLE
IJ'5ia:-P __ SPLASH PAO
O' 50' 100'
SCALE
----OVERFLOW PIPE
SWALE
EGE4032,00e
•
RECEIVED
MAY 07 1997
SUPERFUND SECTION
SITE HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
A. General Information
Site Name Johnson Controls Globe Battery
Location Old Greensboro Road, Winston-Salem,
Forsyth County, NC 27102
ID# NCD 000 770 487
Proposed Date of Investigation ~M~a~y_8~,'-~1~9~9_7 ________ _
Date of Briefing Ma 7, 1997 =-"--'-'-----''-'--'-----------------
Date of Debriefing ~M=a"'-~9~,'-=1~9~9~7 ______________ _
Nature of Visit (check one): On-Site Reconnaissance
On-Site Reconnaissance
Site Investigation
X
Health Department Official Contacted Fred Overstreet's voice mail
Date of Contact M_a~-2~,_1_9_9_7 _________________________ _
Site Investigation Team: All site personnel have read the Site Health and
Safety Plan and are familiar with its provisions.
Personnel
Team 1 Doug Moore
Team 1 Doug Rumford
Responsibilities
team leader, recon
reconnaissance
Signc3.ture
:~::a:::p:~~ti::~id Lille:',' Industrial Hygiene Consultant D:/s, ·~
Reviewed By: Jack Butler, Superfund Section Chief 8
State of North Caroli!Jii1.
Department of Envir.-ient,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
Mr. Fred Overstreet
Director, Division ofEnvironmental Health
Forsyth County Health Department
Post Office Box 686
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27102-0686
May 29, 1997
RE: Expanded Site Inspection: Off-Site Reconnaissance
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery
NCD000770487
Dear Mr. Overstreet:
David Lilley of the NC Superfund Section spoke with you today to notify you that the NC Superfund Section will
conduct a site reconnaissance of the subject site located in Forsyth County, North Carolina. The reconnaissance will be
conducted on June 3, 1997 by Doug Moore of the NC Superfund Section.
The purpose of the reconnaissance is to delineate wetlands in the area. You may want to have your representative
meet the reconnaissance team at the site. Ifso, please contact Doug Moore at [phone],ext. 315 and he will
coordinate a meeting.
If the reconnaissance indicates the need for future study of the site, we will contact your office to advise. If you have
any questions, please don't hesitate to call David Lilley or me at [phone].
cc: Phil Prete
Doug Holyfield
Pat Williamson
Scott Ross
David Lilley
Donna Keith
P.O. Box 27687.
Raleigh. North Carolina 27611-7687
Voice 919-7 33-4996
~ Pat DeRosa, Head
Site Evaluation and Removal Branch
NC Superfund Section
f #rfttizji@{jt§fi
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/l O"k post-consumer paper
B. SITE/WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
Waste Type(sl __ X_Liquid X Solid ___ Sludge Gas
Characteristics X Corrosive ___ Ignitable Radioactive
X Volatile X Toxic Reactive Other ---
List Known or Suspected Hazards (physical, chemical biological or
radioactive) on Site and their toxicological effects. Also, if known, list
chemical amounts
HAZARD
PAHs
Pyrene (noncarcinogenic)
Benzo[a]pyrene (carcinogenic)
Lead
EXPOSURE
WARNING PROPERTIES LIMIT
vary according to compound, many are varies
carcinogenic-indicators listed below
OT= no data
OT no data PEL=
OT= no data
no data
0. 2mg/m3
O. 05 mg/m'
• •
ID# NCD 000 770 487
Facility Description: Size 63 acres Buildings es
Disposal Methods Being Investigated Spillage of hazardous material.
Unusual Features on Site (dike integrity, power lines, terrain, etc.):
none known
History of the Site: The facility has been used for the manufacture of
batteries, primarily for automobiles. In the past, lead dust may have been
released to the atmosphere during filter bag changes. There have been
sulfuric acid spills in the late 1970s and early 1980.
C. HAZARD EVALUATION
The site can be toured in level D protection. No sampling will be
conducted by suoerfund personnel at this time. Chemically resistant steel
toed work boots will be worn while touring the site,
D. WORK PLAN INSTRUCTION
Map or Sketch Attached? ~y~e~s'----
Perimeter Identified? no =----
Command Post Identified? no =----
Zones of Contamination Identified? no =----
Personal Protective Equipment/Level of Protection: ---
Modifications
C __ X __ D
•
Surveillance Equipment:
HNU
OVA
Explosimeter
Decontamination Procedures
•
ID# NCD 000 770 487
Detector Tubes and Pumps
02 Meter
Radiation Monitor
_____ Level C Respirator wash, respirator removal, suit wash (if needed),
suit removal, boot wash, boot removal and glove removal.
_ __,x"--__ Level D Boot wash and rinse and boot removal, suit removal, glove
and goggle removal.
Modifications Dispose of trash properly, on-site if possible.
Work Schedule/Visit Objectives The purpose of this visit is to determine
if the site poses a threat to the public health or environment because of
releases of contaminants to soil, surface water, groundwater, or air.
No sampling will be conducted at this time.
EMERGENCY PRECAUTIONS
Route of Exposure
E es
Skin
Inhalation
Ingestion
First Aid
irrigate immediately
soap and water wash
fresh air and artificial respiration
get medical attention immediately
• •
ID# NCO 000 770 487
Location of Nearest Phone: on-site: this is an operational facility
Hospital (Address and Phone Number)
Forsyth Memorial Hospital, 3333 Silas Creek Parkway, Winston -Salem, NC
[phone] -can handle chemically contaminated patients
Emergency Transportation Systems (Phone Numbers)
Fire 911
Ambulance -"9~1~1:;._ _________________ _
Rescue Squad --=9~1~1,_ _______________ _
Emergency Route to Hospital Take a left onto Old Greensboro Rd., then get
on Route 40/421 West towards Winston-Salem. Take the Silas Creek Parkway
exit and turn left. The hospital is about 8 miles from the site.
PREVAILING WEATHER CONDITIONS AND FORECAST Partly cloudy with rain starting
towards the end of the day, high around 80.
EQUIPMENT CHECKLIST
Air purifying respirator
cartridges for respirator
Eye Wash Unit
HNU
OVA
Explosimeter
Radiation Monitor
Decontamination
Materials
_....:..:X'--First Aid Kit
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
3 gal. Deionized H20
Rainsuit
Gloves (PE/PVC/nitrile/cloth)
Boots/Boot Covers
Coveralls (tyvek/saranex)
Eye Protection
Hard Hat
Poison Control Center -State Coordinator
Duke University Medical Center
Telephone: [phone]
Box 3024
Durham, NC 27710
ASHEVILLE
704-255-4490
CHARLOTTE
704-379-5827
Western NC Poison
Control Center
Memorial Mission Hosp.
509 Biltmore Ave. 28801
Mercy Hospital
2001 Vail Ave, 28207
DURHAM Duke Univ. Med. Center
1-80~ 07, 27710
GREENSBORO Moses Cone Hospital
919-379-4105 1200 N. Elm St. 27420
sa e orm.
HENDERSONVILLE
704-693-6522
Ext. 555,556
HICKORY
704-322-6649
JACKSONVILLE
919-577-2555
WILMINGTON
919-343-7046
Margaret R. Pardee
Memorial Hospital
Fleming St., 28739
Catawba Mem. Hosp.
Fairgrove Chur. Rd 28601
Onslow Mem. Hospital
Western Blvd. 28540
New Hanover Mem. Hospital
2131 S. 17th St. 28401
~
,_ r;;;'(.-.. ::-\ " -•·---. :,,y-. '6·:·.\_i' ~ ~-'1,'•' •f~""· . ' 1~~i\':i·;· .. 1.Yt SLL1:~~~\\;(;::i ~-\ ~ \ .. _ ~ ' ii ('.'-: •,;•. ''" ....
l8f.~~::, ·="""tl__s-.. ·.:·::;:: .. ----P"'---"-'-.
j~. I-~. 1;,1f, 1,
I' '\"1,i ~-~~ ..
:f.. AS ;,;:,~ 1·•:)/
'
\
. ',r ~ :"/(
•sil-· •·'/ ::,,u,
··"'
J
-... :r~,,., .. ;:;; ",,., . ~ ~l )_.,,,~I. /1' J,1 -./· . --"· ~ j' .....-,, . ..,l'i, /.. _,....0,1 1:J WIL I _,.--·
''ti!. .., .. ,. L ~ ; I 111 '1. l', ' Ii ·t' ~ • 1 '?,•' 2 ~ ~ } .. ~ ''
( ,p J.;"ft:"'--L_ 1~1
:' v-:;" ./ / ., ... ,, -.-~':h ... { t,lt/GS\ ~~4 SI;;-:;
"""" ( .•. '""": \ "c
"' •;.;P
J!u{ ~l ' ··7
LE!HIIGII ::::~• I / '•'
.. -,·~·-f -:: ('-1i"-t
,..v ,01,t~, <~~
).:.:·;·.· ~ ~!_:<:,.,' ~ ,, '" >(.tf { ,'(. , :••o:
tt _,. ~ -. ; ~ •1
Uh
' "'" ' ~ '
• •
TO BE COMPLETED BY PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT MANAGER: Doug Moore PROJECT: Johnson Controls
INVESTIGATION DATE: May 8, 1997
RECONNAISSANCE x SAMPLING VISIT REMEDIATION/SAMPLING OVERVIEW
Respirator Worn By Approximate Time in Respirator
Air Monitoring Data (Include Calibration Reading)
HNU:
OVA:
Explosimeter:
Radiation Meter:
Were there any injuries? ___ _ If yes, explain: ______________ _
If the maximum personal protective equipment as outlined in the Hazard
Evaluation Section was not used, please justify:
Visitors Present Organization Represented
Signature
• •
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE INFORMATION FORM
Chemical Name: ~P*y_r~e~o~e __________ _
I. PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Reference
Chemical Formula .Q16 .. ...!:h0----=
Natural Physical State at 25°C ~s~oAlAi~d----~~
Vapor Pressure mm Hg at 20°c
Melting Point 12.Q°F/"...Q Boiling Point 404°F/"...Q
Flash Point (open or closed cup) ----~°C/°F
1. 2
1. 2
1. 2
Solubility - H20 insoluble 1.2
Other partially soluble in organic solvents 1.2
=
. Ph¥sica~ ~eatu:es: (odor, color, etc.) Colorless
sol1d rinmur1t1es give a yellow colorl 11.21
II. TOXICOLOGICAL DATA
standards: no data TLV
IDLH no data PEL
Routes of Exposure: Inhalation. Ingestion. Skin
absrobtion. Eye contact
no data
Acute/Chronic Symptoms: Pyrene is carcinogenic. absorbed
through the skin. and a skin irritant 131
First Aid: Inhalation: artificial respiration; Ingestion:
get medical attention immediately; Eye contact; irrigate
immediately; skin contact: soap and water wash
immediately.
• •
Chemical Name; ~P.v_r-e~o~e~----------
III, HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTICS Reference
A. Combustibility Yes _ No _
Toxic by-products When heated to combustion, ovrene
emits acrid smoke and fumes
B, Flammability LEL --~ UEL ---~
c.
o.
Reactivity Hazard
Corrosivity Hazard
Neutralizing agent:
yes/no pH:
E. Radioactive Hazard Exposure Rate
Background yea/no
Alpha particles yes/no
Beta particles yea/no
Gamma radiation yes/no
IV. REFERENCES
1. The Merck Index. 11th Edition. 1989,
2. The condensed Chemical Dictionary. Hawley. 11th.
Edition. 1987.
3, CAMEO computer data base developed by EPA and NOAA.
1986,
• •
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE INFORMATION FORM
Chemical Name: ~B~e~n~z~o~[~a~J~p~y&r~e~n~e ______________ =
I. PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Reference
Chemical Formula ~C-2~Q~H-1_2 ____ ~
Natural Physical State at 25°C solid 1.2
Vapor Pressure----~ mm Hg at 20°c
Melting Point 179 °F/°C Boiling Point 310-312 °F/°C-
1.2.3
Flash Point (open or closed cup) nonflammable°C/°F
Solubility -H20 insoluble in water 1.2.3
other Slightly soluble in alcohol and 1.2
methanol. slightly soluble in benzene. toluene. xylene.
Physical Features: (odor, color, etc.) Yellowish crystals with a
faint aromatic odor (1.2.31
II. TOXICOLOGICAL DATA
Standards: TLV suspected human carcinogen (4)
PEL 0.2 mg/m3 (5)
no data IDLH
Routes of Exposure: Ingestion. Inhalation. Skin/Eye contact
Acute/Chronic Symptoms: Irritation of lungs and skin.
bronchitis. coughing. breathing difficulty. Long-term exposure
may affect lungs. kidneys. skin. urinary tract. reproductive
First Aid: Inhalation: artificial respiration; Ingestion; get
medical attention immediately; Eye contact: irrigate
immediately; Skin contact: soap and water wash immediately.
Chemical Name: Benzo[alpyrene
III. HAZARDOUS
CHARACTERISTIC s Reference
•
A. Combustibility Yes No~
Toxic by-products this is a product
of incomplete combustion
B. Flammability LEL --~ UEL
•
c. Reactivity Hazard Incompatible with strong oxidizers
D. Corrosivity Hazard
Neutralizing agent:
E. Radioactive Hazard
Background yes/no
Alpha particles yes/no
Beta particles yes/no
Gamma radiation yes/no
IV. REFERENCES
yes/no pH:
1. The Merck Index. 11th Edition. 1989.
Exposure Rate
2. The condensed chemical Dictionary. Hawley. 11th.
Edition. 1987,
3. Chemical safety Data Guide. The Bureau of National
Affairs. 1985,
4, Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices
for 1995-1996.ACGIH
5, 29 CFR 1910.1000
• •
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE INFORMATION FORM
Chemical Name: Lead. inorganic dusts
I. PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Chemical Formula
Natural Physical State at 25°C solid
Vapor Pressure J:1J..A mm Hg at 20°c
Reference
Melting Point 327.4°F/°C Boiling Point 1,740°F/°C _... __ _
Flash Point (open or closed cup) liLJ',,_°C/°F
Solubility - H20 J:1J..A
Other
Physical Features: (odor, color, etc.) appearance and odor
vary depending upon specific compound.
II. TOXICOLOGICAL DATA
suspected or confermed human
Standards: .15 mg/m3 (2l TLV
NIA (4l IDLH
carcinogen
0.05 mg/m 3 (3) PEL
Routes of Exposure:
contact(3)
inhalation. ingestion. eye contact. skin
Acute/Chronic symptoms:Acute; lassitude. pallor. constipation.
abdominal pain. gingiyal gum line. tremors. Target organs: GI
tract. CNS. kidneys. blood. (3)
First Aid: Inhalation; artificial respiration; Ingestion: get
medical attention immediately; Eye contact: irrigate immediately;
Skin contact: soap and water wash immediately
•
Chemical Name: Lead. inorganic dusts
III. HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTICS
A. Combustibility Yes
Toxic by-products
No _lL
B. Flammability LEL N/A
c. Reactivity Hazard
D. Corrosivity Hazard
Neutralizing agent:
None
yes/no
•
Reference
UEL
pH: -
E. Radioactive Hazard Exposure Rate
Background yes/no
Alpha particles yes/no
Beta particles yes/no
Gamma radiation yes/no
IV. REFERENCES
(1)
( 2)
Indices
(3)
(4)
The Merck Index. 11th Edition. 1989
Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure
for 1994-1995. ACGIH,
29 CFR 1910,1025
Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. NIOSH. 1990,
·· State of North Carolina
Department of EnvirorAnt,
Health and Natural Re~rces
Division of Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
FAX TRANSMITTAL RECORD
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
'?76 -5'f':i:s /A<-,,.) lH6 -B'*~ It'. 2:s
-:J>oV6~ /IA.oo,'l,6 Superfund Section
P~rz:-tM Wert.A-No lpewrtf1c.Avo,.,, · A..,-~ifrv.roAJ UJ,vnet,t,,&
'nf-c../ t-I '7f/
Number of pages (including cover) 2
Comments:
lta?tv{trl) /r lif£ /VW/ rnt;>-p ~R l,,/1NJ'n1CJ -Sht.t,.,_
c:lfsT,, /IV 77+€ V/CtlJ/71/ .C,:: 711-E 7T<>tfMSoJV l'.'.eyv:17:iei,.t..s ff<.1L-tT7/.
T 1ptv£ UR~t-EA S¢veyAL A(?EM' Tll-ttr My r:e&Ul'7f"t,µ
WEV""LJIMl.h.f , WJH C.lf 19/!.),R_ oE C,77,:,,v WtJ>V'-C> £.(I-7P •
Confirm receipt of document(s):
favi,.YI:! Pto 0 1te • Superfund Section
SF/slb(C:IWPWIN601WPDOCS\SFISF-FAX.FRM)
P.O. Box 27687,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Voice 919-733-4996
I 4N /SE
[phone]. ext. 5 ts
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
J •
t:\L WETLANDS. INVENTORY
STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
,..,c.-. c.~e,• ""'' ,w~u<E:Rrow =~~.,.,' :~~r::(~~~1L:',;':, · ""'c-:::-7' ooo <m •n ✓~~~';.;~~.,'-~~-~' .. , ,•TS BO"Q7'30" llEF -;-::v --. '· ..... ,\T.-,~ ,"'"('vi.:,p-z,,:•~:-7 ~ I -36"07
z~±r: ~.;.r --•.]:J•u)ii,,'/ir\,.,,,~:;:,t~j':;:•;;;:;;·~~'~":?J~:;i t, .· : .. · _,: / . .-~:,~,~~
~/B:: it~ ·r~· .... ·': N(r'tt, :!'Ill.',_
~t~~'ft4
: ~: .
,
00<
"
' ,
j
~ ' ' '
(a'/~\ . ;,;~½es~:::::~~ ' ~ t\~ ,.._ ,•'\/ ;pj \;.~ -1
~ 1,1Ur,') I \\.J; ... .,.
/:' ·.~-~ ,J ,, -~
~ ~~~~ I , .. ,
•✓ ~tit'f--:f/'ir,··
~l-)j = ~r•~
a -"":~~-,,...,'---'.:;'._( ~ ( i:".l •-r 11c· r / !~ I w
NC SUPERFUND SECTION Fax:[phone] • • ** Transmit Conf.Report **
Ma~ 5 '97 13:28
NC SUPERFUND SECTION ---> 98765823
No. i 0002
Mode NORMAL
Time 2'08"
Pages 2 Page(s)
Result 0 K
State of North Caroli~
• Department of Envir0Wnent,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management,
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
~A FILE CO p y ·; ;,,,._•1&4\9--
D EHN R
Mr. Fred Overstreet
Director, Division of Environmental Health
Forsyth County Health Department
Post Office Box 686
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27102-0686
RE: On-Site Reconnaissance
Expanded Site Inspection
Johnson Controls, NCD000770487
Dear Mr. Overstreet:
May 2, 1997
David Lilley of the NC Superfund Section left a message on your voice today to notify you that the NC
Superfund Section will conduct a site reconnaissance of the subject site located in Forsyth County, North
Carolina. The reconnaissance will be conducted on May 8, I 997 by Doug Moore of the NC Superfund Section.
The purpose of the reconnaissance is to determine if the site poses a hazard to public health or the
environment because ofreleases of contaminants to soil, surface water, groundwater, or air. The reconnaissance
team will locate all nearby water supplies (surface and groundwater, community and private) and any close
sensitive environments, schools, and day care centers.
This reconnaissance is not an emergency situation but is a normal step in the evaluation of all
uncontrolled and unregulated potential hazardous waste sites in North Carolina. You may want to have your
representative meet the reconnaissance team at the site. Ifso, please contact Doug Moore at [phone],
ext. 315 and he will coordinate a meeting. I am enclosing background data on the site for your information.
If the reconnaissance indicates the need for future study of the site, we will contact your office to advise.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call David Lilley or me at [phone].
Enclosures
cc: Phil Prete
Doug Holyfield
Pat Williamson
Scott Ross
David Lilley
Donna Keith
P.O. Box 27687.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Voice 919-733-4996
M /P:t DeRosa, Head
Site Evaluation and Removal Branch
NC Superfund Section
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/l0"lo post-consumer paper
• Federal • Trip Notification & Authorization
Prepared by: · 7) [h ~-c a,if
"Use Dl:.ick Ink or Typewriter only-Staff to (j]J out first 2 blocks only.
Site Trip
Date of Trip: Jijvr:,;; / /vto/. [{
If trip date changed or cancelled note below:
Trip Date Changed To: ____ Cancelled:
NCD#: WO 770 4~--Z
Ci ty: (.,J,µ s--;i;rJ -:xrr.,e Nt ,., c
Reason for Trip:
Site Name: Jof-tfJJ<!>•"' 6;077",24 ... f'
County: nf'.-r--n4-
Today's Date: ;) 0o:;r _ 7)
Name of Hotel (Overnight Trip): Hotel Telephone Number: ( ) --------
Project Team Leader: fl ui,; /boo.'<-c
Assistan:s: ~,:;.,11 fr'~,..,,._,=t."..2> .
Attach To Notification Form: 1 copy each:
Submit to the
Industrial Hygienist
Authorized by: \
Preliminary Assessment Form (First page only)
Site Map
PA Transmittal Letter
(Please list appropriate County Health Department contact person to call to advise of 1rip) · · T)irel,for/ D.:v • cf Environmental Supervisor or Health Director to call: Q\r freJ Cverareeffitle: w,11,. ffe:at-K
Notes:
(Note if Dr., M.P., etc.)
Telephone Number: r.10)7:{7 -J..7~o
Health Department Official Contacted: rrd Ot,f.(f,f,~di /lp~C~
Back Up Letter Required: Yes _L No
IVe-b£-eJ /r\r. Ovet:s/rr--e.l ll;ct. Vo,?('. ,Jla, I
Ii""\:< -:i.._-17 {/),6L)
State of North Carola
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Managemert ( ( [ I"" ,., -~,I
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor r L. [., :L ~-· J j
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
Mr. Leon Powell
Environmental Health Supervisor
Johnston County Health Department
205 South Second Street
Smithfield, NC 27577
RE: Removal Oversight
Peele Pesticide Site
NCO 986 171 338
Dear Mr. Powell:
May 2, 1997
David Lilley of the NC Superfund Section spoke with Ms. Janel Parker of your office today to notify you
that the NC Superfund Section will conduct a site inspection of the subject site located in Johnston County, North
Carolina. The inspection will be conducted May 6 through July 6, 1997 by Harry Zinn of the NC Superfund
Section.
The purpose of the inspection is to oversee·the removal of pesticide contaminated soil and conduct
confirmation sampling. You may want to have your representative meet the inspection team at the site. If so,
please contact Harry Zinn at [phone], ext 313 and he will coordinate a meeting.
If the inspection indicates the need for future study of the site, we will contact your office to advise. If
you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call David Lilley or me at [phone].
cc: Phil Prete
Doug Holyfield
Pat Williamson
Scott Ross
David Lilley
Donna Keith
P.O. Box 27687,
Roleigh, North Corolino 27611-7687
Voice 919-733-4996
Bruce Nicholson, Head
Special Remediation Branch
NC Superfund Section
ifl.Tl°"i,.... FAX [phone] l" ... 'f" 'I; An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Rt:iduc;e! Rcu&e ~
" ~ '' ' "" f¥--■50%-_,re111c11yc.,l.,e•d•/l•O'l•¼.•p•o•s•t-,.co,.n,.s111u_,m,.e,.r ii,p111ap11e""r--
Federal • Trip Notification & Authorization
. // -7. Prepared by: 1Ftf!.f!"(' ?11'¢'/r/
"l:se Iliad lnJ.: or Typewriter only-Staff 10 fill out first:! blocks only.
Site Trip
If trip date changed or cancelled note below:
Trip Date Changed To: _____ Cancelled:
NCD#: CJYG 171 33 6
City: Ci. -\--
R f T · n \ ().,, -/, t ·t eason or np: ......:l<.:.:~s.:"""=·-"v-='-:c.._--'=::..:':....,.:'--''=-'"--'-------------------
Name of Hotel (Overnight Trip): ________ Hotel Telephone Number: ( ) _ -__ _
Project Team Leader: _ \-\ A-KitV 21;,,,,J
Assistants: T..~-I', . --'-'"'-'-'-'-'--=--------
Attach To Notification Form: I copy each:
Submit to the
Industrial Hygienist
Preliminary Assessment Form (First page only)
Site Map
PA Transmittal Letter
(!'lease list appropriate County Health Dcpanmcnt contact person to cal! to advise of trip)
Environmental Supervisor or Health Director to call: /nr, &;0,, ,f{;,.4 //
E11v. 1/e11!-li.
Title: <;;c,-0,>r1115c,r
' (Note if Dr., MJ'., c1c.)
Telephone Number: (9 Jq) f?'7 -Sf g-o
Notes: Health Department Official Contacted;-)QoPf Po, ke:'
Back Up Letter Required: Yes / No I: --Ii -,J. . · ' , I) . • o ~/41,led A,-s: ra.'k.-".· .-C,.;r /4.r_ ,er~!/
Note: Sip,cd ori~nal to Data Mana;_!cr
State of North ccf.luna
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
,,. .. -------UL -
DEHNR
April 24, 1996
Mr. Doug Moore
Super Fund Section
401 Oberlin Road
Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27605
Dear Mr. Moore:
RECEIVED
APR 2 8 1997
SUPERFUND SECTION
This is in reference to your request on Thursday, April 24, 1997, concerning NPDES
point source location sites discharging into Lowery Creek and Salem Lake around the
Winston Salem area. Toe following information is enclosed per your request.
The subbasin map displays preliminarily estimated points of discharge, plotted
according to the attached facility listing. Please note that on the list of dischargers .cl! -•
appears, which means "ceased discharging." If a facility has ceased discharging, a Y is shown
in the column to indicate yes. However, in some Instances, an NPDES permit may have
transferred to a Stormwater Permit. When this occurs, a SJ:Y: is shown in this same column to
Indicate Stormwater Permit. For most of these cases, the estimated location of the discharge
still remains on the subbasin map. Correspondence with each regional office to verify this
information and to discern other discrepancies which may exist, will be done on a periodic
basis in the future when each river basin is completed. The information on the Yadkin
Rivere Basin has been recently updated, and the information is substantially accurate with
the exception of some dischargers which have not been plotted, due to the perniit just
recently being issued. However, please keep in mind that subbasin mapping is an ongoing
project within the Technical Support Branch, and the information is subject to change daily.
If I can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me at 919-733-5083,
ext 504.
MLT:mlt
Enclosures
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Sincerely,
;)?fl,{~-u.-ktA~_,,
Marcia Toler-McCullen
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
•
+
03 07 04
l..
ORIGINAL
Z-
03 07 04
ORIGINAL
•
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 1, 1995
MEMORANDUM
TQ
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Miniature Subbasin Files
Subbasin: 03-07-04
Marcia Toler-McCullen ~
In stream Assessment Unit
Outline For System
On Miniature Subbasin Files
The subbasin map displays estimated points of discharge, plotted according to
the attached facility listing. Please note that on the list of dischargers, the column
.cJl appears, which means "ceased discharging." If a facility has ceased operation
(for whatever reason: actually ceased, application withdrawn, application
returned, permit rescission, permit denied, permit revoked, permit not necessary,
etc.), a Y. is shown in the column to indicate yes. However in some instances, an
NPDES permit may have transferred to a Stormwater Permit. When this occurs, a
SJY. is shown in this same column to indicate Stormwater Permit. It is no longer
maintained on our databases, and additional information must be obtained from the
Permits & Engineering Stormwater Unit. For each of these cases, the estimated
location of the discharge will continue to remain on the subbasin map.
Special Note. There may be discharge locations with the same given map
number. Since the plotting of these dischargers is on such a small scale map, space
is very limited. When there is more than one discharger within a close proximity
of the latitude / longitude reading; and the discharge location on the topographical
map is within the same general location (whether each facility discharger is on the
same receiving stream or not); then, the same map number will be used .to
represent each of the dischargers. This will reserve space, allowing the maps to be
viewed in a more legible, attractive format.
The facility list consists of all existing, permitted and proposed,
permitted dischargers. In instances where a facility is existing, unpermitted,
the facility will not be included on the list u.n1il the facility has been permitted.
If and when the facility is ever permitted, then it will be included in the respective
miniature subbasin master file. At no time will proposed, unpermjtted facilities
be included in this file. At the present, there is no factor on the facility list
showing the distinction between the existing and proposed permitted discharge.
This system is comprised of vital information for the Water Quality. Section of
DEM in determining all point source discharge locations within th_e State of North
Carolina. The facility listings at the present; however, are limited only to the
enclosed information. In the future, the facility listings will be updated to include
a.!! vital information concerning each facility through a. computerized, digital
system. Until then, this format will be the only resource available for point source
discharge locations within the state.
MLT:mlt
Attachments
• • J/5/96
SUBBASIN, 30704
Mu Facility Btttl!IDK SY:1:am Design £lu1t li1Ut11de: 1~11a1Uud1: kl2
NPDFS # County ltl.Gl! Nap Quad
William Anderson Rcsidalce MuddyCnek 0.0006 36°11 '35" 80°19'43"
NCG550410 (Fonyth) C 17NE
Thomas F. Bell Residence lITMuddyCnek 0.00045 36°11'37" 80°19'43"
NCG550269 (Forsyth) C 17NE
Wade C. Motsing..-Residalce lIT Muddy Cnek 0.00045 36°11'30" 80°19'50"
NCG550239 (Fonyth) C 17NE
2 Betharua WWTP MuddyCnek 0.03 36°14'00" 80°19'52" y
NC0028720 (Forsyth) C 17NE
3 Richanl E. Cain Resideoce lIT Muddy Cnek 0.00045 36°09'46" 80'20'21"
NCG550272 (Forsyth) C 17NE
3 Carol Newman Residence lIT Muddy Cnek 0.00045 36'09'51" 80°20'31"
NCG550647 (Forsyth) C 17NE
3 Steven Gray Spillman Residence lIT Muddy Cnek 0.0006 36°09'42" 80°20'46"
NCG550114 (Forsyth) C 17NE
4 John M. Chambers Residence Bill Branch 0.00045 36°09'19" 80°22'21"
NCG550452 (Forsyth) C 17NE
5 Crown Central Petroleum/Fast Fare# NC-591 lIT Silas Cn:el: 0.0002 36°07'46" 80°15'33"
NC0083739 (Forsyth) C 17NE
5 R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co I Whitaker Park lIT Silas Cn:el: 0.067 36'07'56" 80°15'10"
NCG500096 -001 (Forsyth) C 17NE
5 R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co I Whitaker Park lIT Silas Cteek 0.779 36°08'17" 80°15'33"
NCG500096 -002 (Forsyth) C 17NE
6 John A. Jackson Residence Mill Creek No. 3 0.00045 36°11'26" ·8()'20'47"
NCG550394 (Forsyth) C 17NE
6 Dennis Sykes Residence Mill Creek No.3 0.0003 36°11'23" 80°20'39"
NCG550209 (Forsyth) C 17NE
7 Northwest Middle School lIT Grassy Cn:el: 0.013 36°11'25" 80°18'28" y
NC0035297 (Forsyth) C 17NE
8 Pinebrook Country Club, Inc Mill Creek 0.005 36°10'54" 80°15'20" y
NC0042498 (Forsyth) C 17NE
• • 1/5/96
SUBBASIN, 30704
Mu Facility B,ulvl1:11: Stcl:IUD Design Ehll! l~a&Uud, ldineUud, Ql
NPDES # County lrlii.ll Map Quad
9 R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company llaim,;Creel< 36°14'36" 80"2 l '2 7"
NC0055093 (Forsyth) C 17NE
10 Star Eoteq,rise Facility #20-507-00:J6 !IT Mill Creek 0.00432 36°08'27" 80"18'07"
NCG510071 (Forsyth) C 17NE
11 Town & Country Mobile Home Estates !IT Muddy Cleek 0.0050 36'10'27" 80"21'10" y
NC0064122 (Forsyth) C I7NE
12 US Air Airlines Computer Center Mill Creek Variable 36°10'39" 80"16'41"
NCG500010 (Forsyth) C 17NE
13 Wake Forest University !IT Silas Creek 36"0T52" 80"16'28"
NC0060780 -001 (Forsyth) C 17NE
13 Wake Forest University !IT Silas Cleek 36'07'45" 80"16'26"
NC0060780 -002 (Forsyth) C 17 NE
13 Wake Forest University !IT Silas Creek 36"0T46" 80"16'37"
NC0060780 -003 (Forsyth) C 17NE
13 Wake Forest University !IT Silas C=k 36°07'49" 80" 16'54"
NC0060780 -004 (Forsyth) C 17NE
13 Wake Forest University !IT Silas Crook 36°07'55" 80°16'51"
NC0060780 -005 (Forsyth) C 17NE
13 Wake Forest University !IT Silas Creek 36'07'56" 80"16'54"
NC0060780 -006 (Forsyth) C 17NE
13 Wake Forest University !IT Silas Cleek 36'07'58" 80'16'54"
NC0060780 -007 (Forsyth) C 17NE
14 Stephen L. Estep Residence Bill Branch 0.0003 36°09'05" 80"23'05"
NCG550078 (Forsyth) C 17NW
15 Vienna Elementary School !IT Tomahawk Creek 0.0045 36°08'30" 80"23'15" y
NC0035106 (Forsyth) C 17NW
16 Richard W. Abbott Residence !IT Muddy Creek 0.00024 36°03'57" 80"22'12"
NCG550092 (Forsyth) C 17 SE
17 Michael L. Adler, MD Residence !IT Muddy Cleek 0.00045 36°07'03" 80"20'23"
NCG550122 (Forsyth) C 17 SE
• • l/S/96
SUBBASIN: 30704
fuJ! Fadlltv BiUl!lne Slnam ll1:1lea Ehn:! l,1U111de: l1DDelludi: ~
NPDFS # County lrl!&.U Map auad
18 Bailey's MIIP lITLlttleCreek 0,0016 36°01'44" 80"20'45"
NC0057223 (Forsyth) C 17 SE
18 William C. Council, Jr. Residence lIT Little Creek 0.00045 36°02'09" 80"20'15"
NCG550165 (For,yth) C 17 SE
18 Doris Ann Patterson Residence lIT Little Creek 0.00045 36°01'58" 80"20'20"
NCG550240 (For,yth) C 17 SE
19 BP Oil Company/ Service Station/ Site 24161 lIT Salem Creek --0.005 36°03'55" 80"15'12"
NC0067385 (For,yth) C 17 SE
20 Chevron USA: Gulf Oil Service Station lIT Little Creek 0.0008 36°05'28" 80" 17'10"
NCG510126 (For,yth) C 17 SE
20 Sara Lee Knit Products lIT Ll ttle Creek 0.004 36°05'08" 80"17'56"
NCG500275 (Forsyth) C 17 SE
21 Converters Ink Company lIT Salem Creek 0.0050 36°02'37" 80"19'31"
NCG500219 (For,yth) C 17 SE
22 Glenn W. Craver Residence lIT South Fork Muddy Creek 0.00045. 36°00'35" 80" 17'12"
NCG550310 (Forysth) C 17 SE
23 Mike Csen"enko Residence lIT South Fork Muddy Creek 0.00045 36°01 '00" 80"16'54"
NCG550059 (Forsyth) C 17 SE
23 Barry S. Knight Residence lIT South Fork Muddy Creek 0.00045 36°01 '12" 80" 16'37"
NCG550431 (Forsyth) C 17 SE
23 William S. Rivers Residence lIT South Fork Muddy Creek 0.00045 36°01'00" 80"16'54"
NCG550058 (Forsyth) C 17 SE
23 Dwight H. Simmons Residence lIT South Fork Muddy Creek 0.0003 36°01'04" 80" 16'54"
NCG550103 (For,yth) C 17 SE
24 Richanl A Edwanls Residence South Fork Muddy Creek 0.00045 36°00'59" 80"15'19"
NCG550136 (For,yth) C 17 SE
24 Waltec Richard Manus Residence South Fork Muddy Creek 0.00045 36°01 '00" 80"15'15"
NC0048119 (Forsyth) C 17 SE
25 Arvil Stanley Crater Residence lIT Salem Creek 0.00045 36°01'52" 80"20'09"
NCG550074 (For,yth) C 17 SE
• • 1/5/96
SUBBASIN: 30704
MAI! Fadlltv Bc,clvlD& s11:,am Design Ehnt 1.1ll111dc l.aueUudc J;;J!
NPDE.S # County M..G.P Map Quad
25 Eddie Ray Kyle Residence UT Salem Creek 0.00045 36'01'25" 80"20·19"
NCG550282 (For,yth) C 17 SE
26 Changho Lee Residence Silas Creek 0.0006 36'03'35" 80"2!'!7"
NCG550!45 (For,yth) C 17 SE
27 Oakwood Haven MIIP Muddy Creek 0.100 36°02'53" 80"22'01" y
NC0035874 (Forsyth) C 17 SE
28 Star Enterprise Facility #20-050-0004 UT Silas Creek 0.0065 36'06'39" 80"!8'20"
NCG5!0108 (Forsyth) C 17 SE
29 Cobblestone Development Corporation UT Muddy Creek 0.05 36°02'23" 80"22'47" y
NC00454!! (Forsyth) C 17 SW
29 Combined Properties, Inc/ Ramada Inn -West UT Muddy Creek 0.03 36°02'20" 80"22'4!" y
NC0040371 (Forsyth) C 17 SW
29 Jerry E. Stone Residence lJT Muddy Creek 0.00045 36°02'13" 80"22'22"
NCG55008! (Forsyth) C 17 SE
30 Winston Salem / An:hie Elledge WWTP Salem Creek 30.0 36°01'46" 80"18'54"
NC0037834 (Forsyth) C 17 SE
31 Woodlawn Trailer Pari< UT Muddy Creek 0.0052 / 36'0!'31" ·80"22'10" ·y
NC0062260 (For,yth) 0.0069 C 17 SE
32 Robert S. Conklin Residence UT Reynolds Creek 0.00045 36°05'!8" 80"22'56"
NCG550254 (For,yth) C 17 SW
32 L.A. Reynolds Landscaping, Inc Reynolds Creek 0.0005 36°05'28" 80"22'42" y
NC0044822 (Forsyth) C 17 SW
33 CWS I Sequoia Place WWTP Reynolds Creek 0.135 I 36°05'31" 80"23'50"
NC0057509 (Forsyth) 0.21 C 17 SW
34 Robert N. Headley Residence UT Tomahawk Creek 0.00048 36°06'35" 80"23'27"
NCG550036 (Forsyth) C 17 SW
35 Melanie Jurga Residence UT Muddy Creek 0.00045 36'03'41" 80"22'59"
NC0029301 (Forsyth) C 17 SW
35 Linda Neal Reside.nee UT Muddy Creek 0.0006 36°03'42" 80"22'55"
NCG550075 (Forsyth) C!7SW
• • 1/5/96
SUBBASIN, 30704
~ Facllltv lbnlvlne SltUUD Design Ehn! l.1Ul11de l1flnell11de .cJl
NPDFS # Countv Mfil! Map Quad
35 Southwest Elementary School lIT Muddy Creek 0.0122 36'04'03" 80"22'54" y
NC0035301 (Forsyth) C 17 SW
35 R.T. Stankwytcb Residence lIT Muddy Creek 0.00045 36°03'42" 80"22'56"
NCG550052 (Forsyth) C 17 SW
35 West Forsyth Senior High School Uf Muddy Creek 0.0183 36°03'48" 80"23'08" y
NC0035548 (Forsyth) C 17 SW
36 James u,e Sberma-Residence Uf Tomahawk Creek 0.00045 36°06'45" 80"23'55"
NCG550139 (Forsyth) C 17 SW
37 Samuel G. Tuttle Residence ur Muddy Creek 0.0006 36°03'08" 80"22'52"
NCG550212 (Forsyth) C 17 SW
37 Willow Trace Apartments WWfP Uf Muddy Creek 0.050 36°03'01" 80"23'05" y
NC0036340 (Forsyth) C 17 SW
38 Richard F. Wagner Residence UT Tomahawk Creek 0.00045 36°07'04" 80"23'33"
NCG550332 (Forsyth) C 17 SW
38 Thomas M. Whelan Residence UT Tomahawk Creek 0.00036 36°07'30" 80"23'38"
NCG540001 (Forsyth) CI7SW
39 Champion Industries, Inc Leak Fon 0.0028 36°08'55" 80"14'34"
NCG500075 (Forsyth) C 18NW
40 Stephen R. Culler Residence UT Mill Creek 0.00045 36°11'05" 80" 14'58"
NCG550168 (Forsyth) C 18NW
41 Jack R. Elliott Residence Mill Creek 0.0005 36°10'37" 80"10'42"
NCG550177 (Forsyth) C 18NW
41 Paul R. Ellis Residence Mill Creek 0.0003 36°10'36" 80"10'41"
NCG550176 (Forsyth) C 18NW
41 Darragh Klemmons Property Mill Creek 0.00045 36°10'37" 80"11 '00"
NC0077640 (Forsyth) c 18NW
41 Lona Rhoades Residence -Lot 6A-l Mill Creek 0.0003 36°10'36" 80"10'41"
NCG550174 (Forsyth) C !8NW
41 Lona Rhoades Residence -Lot 6A-2 Mill Creek 0.0003 36°10'36" 80"10'41"
NCG550175 (Forsyth) C 18NW
• 9/18/96
SUB BASIN: 30704
M.!!l! Ea ell It)'. ReceJvinr Stream Design flow Latitude Longitude ru
NPDES # County lli,.ll Map Quad
41 Ila Tu1tle Residence Mill Creek 0.00024 36°10'36" 80°10'44"
NCG550534 (Forsyth) C 18NW
41 Danny F. Ward Residence Mill Creek 0:00045 36°10'31" 80°11 '30"
NCG550520 (Forsyth) c 18NW
42 Gant Oil Company I Site #31 UT Mill Creek 0.0144 36°09'56" 80°12'02"
NCG510061 (Forsyth) C 18 NW
42 Nonnan G. Mabe, Jr. Residence UT Mill Creek 0.00045 36°09'53" 80°11'58"
NCG550383 (Forsyth) C 18 NW
42 Prince Ibraham Elementary School UT Mill Creek 0.0056 36°09'37" 80°12'07" y
NC0035572 (Forsyth) C 18NW
43 Stan R. Griffin Residence UT Mill Creek 0.00045 36°10'41" 80°14'53"
NCG550054 (Forsyth) C 18NW
43 MSWS I Pinebrook Manor Subdivision Mill Creek 0.015 I 36°10'42" 80°14'42" y
NC0068772 (Forsyth) 0.070 C 18NW
44 Hertz Rental Car UT Brushy Fork 0.004 36°07'58" 80°13'54" y
NC0080!87 (Forsyth) C 18 NW
44 Norfolk & Western Railway Company UT Brushy Fork 0.002 36°08'04" 80°14'03"
NC0046931 (Forsyth) C 18 NW
44 Wachovia Southern Oil Company UT Brushy Fork 0.0216 36°07'53" 80°13'50"
NC0084115 (Forsyth) Cl8NW
45 Frances M. Meacham Residence UT Lowery Mill Creek 0.00045 36°08'05" 80°10'20"
NCG550210 (Forsyth) C 18NW
46 Judia Crockett Residence Frazier Creek 0.0006 36°07'09" 80°11'31"
NCG550101 (Forsyth) Cl8SW
46 JoAnn Gamhill Residence Frazier Creek 0.0006 36°07'03" 80°11'43"
NC0060518 (Forsyth) C 18 SW
46 Brenda S. Miller Residence Fra:ner Creek 0.00045 36°07'32" 80°11'26"
NCG550087 (Forsyth) C 18 NW
47 Oak Summit Elementary School UT Mill Creek 0.0065 36°10'00" 80°14'08" y
NC0035076 (Forsyth) C 18NW
• • 9/18/96
SUB BASIN, 30704
.M..;w Facility Bettlvlug Stream Design Flow l.atttude Loncitude .c.n
NPDES # County Mi& Map auad
48 Pellcare Corporation / Pellcare Nursing Home UT Mill Creek 0.025 36'09'53" 80'11'22" y
NC0034533 (Forsyth) C 18NW
48 Scarlen Acres Ml-IP UT Mill Creek 0.02 36°10'03" 80°11'06"
NC0061204 (Forsyth) C18NW
49 Richard R. Sexton Residence Lowery Mill Creek 0.00045 36°08'08" 80°09'31"
NCG550056 (Forsyth) C 18 NW
49 George T. Thompson, Jr Residence Lowery Mill Creek 0.00045 36°08'12" 80'09'29"
NCG550057 (Forsyth) C 18NW
50 US Air Maintenance Facility Bushy Fork 0.0144 36'08'41" 80'13'22"
NC0084760 (Forsyth) C 18NW
51 Lowes Foods, Inc/ Run In Store No. 715 UT Smith Creek 0.0144 36°06'43" 80°05'18"
NC0085138 (Forsyth) C 18 SE
52 Robert B. Glenn High School UT Swain Creek 0.0108 36°04'03" 80°06'52" y
NC0035564 (Forsyth) C 18 SE
53 Gerald W. Sapp Residence UT Smith Creek 0.00045 I 36'05'25" 80°06'09"
NCG550291 (Forsyth) 0.0006 C 18 SE
54 Amoco Oil Company #1160 UT Salem Creek 0.0015 36°04'08" 80'13'.12"
NCG510049 (Forsyth) C18SW
54 R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company / Plant 200 UT Salem Creek 36°04'34" 80'13'32"
NCG500095 (Forsyth) C18SW
55 AT&T /Lexington Road Facility UT Salem Creek 0.3010 36°03'18" 80'13'51"
NC0080853 (Forsyth) C18SW
55 AT&T Technologies, Inc UT Salem Creek Monitor 36°03'18" 80°13'50"
NCG500093 (Forsyth) C18SW
56 David W. Branch Residence Soak.es Creek 0.00045 36°00'54" 80°13'09"
NCG550426 (Forsyth) C18SW
56 James H. Capps, Jr. Residence Soakes Creek 0.00045 36°00'54" 80°13'09"
NCG550428 (Forsyth) C 18 SW
56 John F. Fulk. Jr Residence Soakas Creek 0.00036 36'00'56" 80'13'05"
NCG550003 (Forsyth) C18SW
• 311196
SUBBASIN: 30704
fuJ! Facllltv Recdvloe Slceam llc:1h:11 Ela»: l.allludt: l10DeUudt i;;_n_
NPDFS # County Mfil! Map Quad
56 Keith J. Murphy Residence Soakes Creek 0.00045 36'00'55" 80"13'05"
NCG550502 ·(Forsyth) CISSW
56 Donald B. Tesh Residence Soakes Creek 0.00045 36'00'54" 80"13'09"
NCG550220 (Forsyth) C!8SW
57 Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company UT Bath Branch 36°06'06" 80'14'34"
NCG500089 (Forsyth) C!8SW
57 R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Bath & Linden Branch 0.213 36'05'57" 80'14'27"
NC0004 707 -009 (Forsyth) C !SSW
57 R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Bath & Linden Branch 0.213 36'05'57" 80"14'27"
NC0004707 -01 I (Forsyth) C!8SW
57 R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Bath & Linden Branch 0.213 36'05'57" 80'14'27"
NC0004707 -012 (Forsyth) C!8SW
57 R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Bath & Linden Branch 0.213 36'05'57" 80'14'27"
NC0004707 -013 (Forsyth) C 18 SW
57 R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Bath & Linden Branch 0.213 36'05'57" 80'14'27"
NC0004707 -014 (Forsyth) C!8SW
57 R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Bath & Linden Branch 0.213 36'05'57" 80'14'27"
NC0004707 -015 (Forsyth) Cl8SW
57 R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Bath & Linden Branch 0.213 36'06'08" 80'14'15"
NC0004707 -023 (Forsyth) C !SSW
57 Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc/ Plant H UT Peters Creek 0.0009 36'06'37" 80"14'23"
NCG500012 (Forsyth) C!SSW
58 East Forsyth Senior High School UT Kemers Mill Creek 0.024 36'06'53" 80'09'08" y
NC0035556 (Forsyth) C 18 SW
59 Tracy R. Morgan Residence South Fork Muddy Creek 0.0003 36'03'18" 80'08'25"
NCG550462 (Guilfonl) C 18 SW
60 Sedge Gartlen Elementary School UT Fiddlers Creek 0.0075 36'05'38" 80"08'07" y
NC0035084 (Forsyth) C!SSW
61 Samuel Edward Spencer Residence UT South Fork Muddy Creek 0.00045 36'01'48" 80°10'35"
NCG550527 (Forsyth) C18SW
• • 1/5/96
SUBBASIN, 30704
Mll Facility RHilvlng Slnam Deniro fig![ l.1lll1i1d1: 1.suu:U11d1: Q2
NPDES # County ltlG.D Map Quad
61 Nathan Ray Thomas Residence lIT Saw Mill Branch 0.00045 36°01'52" 8()"()1)'32"
NCG550235 (Fonyth) C 18 SW
62 U.S. Army Reseive Center lIT Salem Creek 36°05'02" 80"13'07" y
NC0028398 (Fonyth) C 18 SW
62 Winston Salem/ R.A. Thomas WfP Salem Creek 36°05'15" 80" 13 '00"
NC0079821 (Forsyth) C18SW
63 Captain Stevens Seafood Restauran~ Inc lIT Reedy Creek 0.0025 35°54'38" 80"19'37"
NC0059218 (Davidsoo) D 17NE
64 MSWS / Frye Bridge WW1P lIT Muddy Creek 0.027 35°59'20" 80"21 '15"
NC0065587 (Forsyth) D 17NE
65 Northwest Elementary School Huff mans Creek 0.010 35°56'24" 80"17'55"
NC0042072 (Davidson) D 17NE
66 Piedmont Converting, Inc Reedy Creek 0.0015 35°54'47" 80"19'50"
NC0070637 -001 (Davidson) D 17NE
66 Piedmont Converting, Inc lIT Reedy Creek 35°54'50" 80"19'58"
NC0070637 -002 (Davidson) D 17NE
67 Quail Run MHP Mille, Creek 0.017 35°59'12" 80"15'59"
NC0070033 (Davidson) D 17NE
67 H. Brian Tucker Residence lIT Mille, Creek 0.00045 35°59'21" 80"15'53"
NCG550094 (Davidson) D 17NE
68 Triad Sand Company MuddyCloek 0.001 -35°58'37" 80"20'16"
NCG520006 (Davidson) 0.004999 D 17NE
68 Triad Sand Company Muddy Clock 35°58'37" 80"20'16"
NCG520027 (Davidsoo) D 17NE
69 Twin Creek Subdivision WWTP FryesCreck 0.08 35°58'37" 80" 18'()1)"
NC0083941 (Davidson) D 17NE
70 Welcome Car Wash lIT Reedy Creek 0.0007 35°54'26" 80" 15'29" y
NC0047171 (Davidson) D 17NE
71 White Oak Transport, Inc/Aaron Sand & Gravel Yadkin River Variable 35°56'54" 80"22'28"
NCG520030 (Davidson) D 17NE
..,
I • • 1/13/97
SUBBASIN, 30704
Map Facility Be~elvlnr Stream Design Flow Latitude Lonritud(• ru
NPDES # County Mfil2 Map Quad
72 Winston Salem/ Muddy Creek WWTP Y ad.kin River 15.0 I 35°55'53" 80°22'10"
NC0050342 -001 (Davidson) 21.0 D 17NE
73 Winston Salem/ Muddy Creek WWTP Muddy Creek 15.0 I 35°59'29" 80°19'58"
NC0050342 -002 (Davidson) 21.0 D 17 NE
74 Belmont Road Apartments North Potts Creek 0.002 35°45'08" 80°19'18" y
NC0064530 (Davidson) D 17 SE
75 Golden Age, Inc / Golden Age Nursing Home UT North Potts Creek 0.0017 35°47'08" 80°19'28" y
NC0059889 (Davidson) D 17 SE
76 Kimberly Clark Corporation I Lexington Mill UT North Potts Creek 35°46'10" 80°19'22"
NCG500098 (Davidson) D 17 SE-
77 Tyro Middle School UT North Potts Creek 0.005 35°48'14" 80°22'07"
NC0042056 (Davidson) D 17 SE
77 West Davidson High School North Potts Creek 0.007 35°48'05" 80°21'55"
NC0031950 (Davidson) D 17 SE
78 Churchland Elementary School UT South Potts Creek 0.0037 35°47'12" 80°24'50"
NC0029947 (Davidson) D 17 SW
79 Davidson Water, Inc/ Davidson WfP UT Yadkin RiVer 0.5 35°51'15" 80°22'58"
NC0084425 (Davidson) D 17 SW
80 Friendly Acres MHP UT Leak Creek 0.0125 35°59'56" 80°13'23" y
NC0063266 (Forsyth) D 18NW
80 William B. Smothers Residence Leak Creek 0.0005 35°59'55" 80° 14'07"
NCG550077 (Forsyth) D 18NW
80 Three R's MHP Leak Creek 0.012 / 35°59'56" 80° 13'27"
NC0051489 (Forsyth) 0.020 D 18 NW
81 North Davidson Senior High School UT Reedy Creek 0.016 35°55'34" 80°14'56" y
NC0042102 -001 (Davidson) D 18NW
81 North Davidson Middle High School UT Reedy Creek 0.0065 35°55'37" 80°14'58" y
NC0042102 -002 (Davidson) D18NW
82 Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc UT Flat Swamp Creek 0.0125 35°46'30" 80°07'12"
NC0023604 (Davidson) D 18 SE
• • 1/5/96
SUBBASIN: 30704
M@J! Facility BM!lliiDR Stc,nm Dealru Eht»: l,alltude l.11u1:Uud1: ~
NPDES # County lr1.G.ll Map Quad
83 Chevron USA, Inc/ Salisbury Facility !IT Grants Creel: Monitor 35°41'03" 80°30'34"
NC0049905 (Rowan) E 16NE
84 Fast Food Men:bandisen;, Inc lIT Grants Creel: Variable 35°38'03" 80°31'33" y
NC0051187 (Rowan) E 16NE
84 Majestic Properties/ Gould Investors L.P. lIT Grants Creel: 0.005 35°3755" 80°32'04"
NC0045675 (Rowan) E 16NE
84 Oak Haven MHP lIT Grants Creel: 0.006 35°38'15" 80°31'35"
NC0037184 (Rowan) E 16NE
85 Westside Swim & Racquet Club, Inc Draft Branch 0.003 35°40'06" 80°33'41"
NC0042439 (Rowan) E 16NE
86 Derrick Truck Stop lITTowner<>ek 0.006 35°36'39" 80°30'52" y
NC0037575 (Rowan) E 16 SE
87 Dominion Yarn Corporation/ Linn Plant lIT Grants Creek 0.08 35°32'51" 80°36'44"
NCG500250 (Rowan) E 16 SE
88 Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc/ Swink Plant No. 16 lIT Grants Creek 0.05 35°36'37" 80°32'36"
NC0004286 (Rowan) E 16 SE
89 Knollwood Elementary School Little Creek 0.011 35°37'29" 80°34'22"
NC0034703 (Rowan) E 16SE
90 LandisWTP Grants Creel: 2.0 35°33'46" 80°36'07"
NC0027502 (Rowan) E 16 SE
91 Rowan Associates/ Mercantile Center lIT Town Creel: 0.0062 35°35'45" 80°32'04"
NC0061034 (Rowan) E 16SE
92 Bill's Truck Stop South Potts Creek 0.006 35°44'59" 80°21'12"
NC0040045 (l)avidsoo) E 17NE
93 Duke Power Company / Buck Steam Station Yadkin River Variable 35°42'49" 80°22'31"
NC0004774 -001 (Rowan) E 17NW
93 Duke Power Company I Buck Steam Station Yadkin Rivei Variable 35°42'44" 80"2l'51"
NC0004774 • 002 (Rowan) E 17NE
93 Duke Power Company/ Buck Steam Station Yadkin River Variable 35°42'50" 80°22'27"
NC0004774 -003 (Rowan) E 17NE
• 2/28/97
SUBBASIN: 30704
Mrul Eacjlitl' Hi;s;:tlvini: :il[!:iUD Desjgn Elow 1.a1i11.uh: 11201:llluh Q:!
NPDES # County Mii..l! Map auad
94 Norfolk Southern Railway Co/ Spencer Yard South Potts Creek 0.317 35°43'53" 80°20'40"
NC0029246 -01 I (Davidson) E 17 NE
95 PPG Industries, Inc North Potts Creek 0.6 35°44'!8" 80°19'32"
NC0004626 (Davidson) E 17 NE
96 Southwood Elementary School UT High Rock Lake 0.010 35°43'49" 80°16'14"
NC0042749 (D.ividson) E 17 NE
97 Bruce Triplen Residence Crane Creek 0.00036 35°39'40" 80°19'23"
NCG550436 (Davi<lson) E 17 NE
98 American Concrete Products. Inc Yadkin River 35°44'38" 80°27'38"
NCG520009 (Rowan) El7NW
99 Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc Yudkin River 4.25 35°43'!3" 80°23'30"
NC0005487 (Rowan) E !7NW
100 Hill Top Rest Home UT Yadkin River ll.ll03 35°43'39" 80°23'05"
NC0059536 (Davidson) EI7NW
IOI Salishury / Grants Creek WWTP Gr,mts Creek 7.5/12.5/ 35'42'42" 80°25'48"
NC0023884 (Rowan)
20.0 El7NW
IOI Spencer WWTP Grnnts Creek 0.75 35°42'50" 80°25'45" .
NC0025593 (Rowan) El7NW
102 Salishury /Town Creek W\VTP Town Cre.ck 5.0 35°4 !'07" 80°24'27"
NC0023892 (Rowan) EI7NW
103 Stillcy·s MHP UT Town Creek 0.010 35°38'02" 80°29'07" y
NC0064297 (Rowan) E 17 NW
104 John R. Witalison Residence UT Panther Creek 0.lKl045 35°33'50" 80°18'40"
NCG540014 (Rowan) E 17 SE
105 Bohhy L. Boyd Retirement Home UT St!eond Creek 0.()()9 35°33'57" 80°22'52" y
NC0064!65 (Rowan) El7SW
106 Faith Elementary School UT Crane Creek 0.()()8 35°35'25" 80°27'49"
NC0035921 lJ{uwanJ E 17 SW
!07 Nazareth Children's Home. Inc UT Second Creek 0.012 35°33'45" 80°25'52" y
NC0058939 (Rowan) E 17 SW
• 12/4/96
SUBBASI1', 30704
Map Eacilltr Biaadvlu~ St[um Design Flow li~tltusle LaorHJHh: ru
NPDES # County Mfill Map Quad
108 Rockwell / Southside WWfP Vf Second Creek 0.200 35°32'38" 80°24'32" y
NC0021768 (Rowan) E 17 SW
109 Silver Valley Elementary School UT Flat Swamp Creek 0.004 35°43'57" 80°06'04"
NC004!602 (Davidson) E 18NE
I JO Central Junior & Senior High School UT Ahhotts Creek 0.014 35°44'21" 80°13'32"
NC0041599 (Davidson) El8NW
Ill Silver Hill Mines, Inc UT Buddle Branch 0.432 35°42'18" 80°12'06" SW
NCG020181 (Davidson) E I8NW
I 12 Integon Life Insurance Corporation UT Tar Branch 0.0015 36°05'38" 70'15'03"
NCG500074 (Forsyth) C 17 SE
I 12 Wachovia West End Center UT Peters Creek 0.0017 36°05'54" 80°15'20"
NCG500080 (Forsyth) C 17 SE
• • State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
April 23, 1997
Chris Fisher, Plant and Environmental Engineer
Johnson Controls, Inc.
2701 Johnson Controls Road
P.O. Box 1667
Kernersville, N.C. 27285
Subj.: 1991 Site Screening Investigation Report
Johnson Controls -Globe Battery Division (NCD 000 770 487)
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, N.C.
Dear Mr. Fisher:
Enclosed is the 1991 SSI report submitted to EPA by Greenhome and O'Mara, Inc. for the
subject site. At that time, G&O recommended that the site progress to the next phase of the pre-
remedial process. Based upon this report and previous file information, EPA has requested that the
Superfund Section proceed with an Expanded Site Inspection. The intial phase of this inspection
will include a preliminary onsite reconnaissance of the site on Thursday, May 8, 1997. I appreciate
your cooperation and look forward to meeting you then. If you have any questions, please call me
at [phone], ext. 315.
Sincerely,
Douglas Moore
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post•consumer paper
MEMO
DATE: July 11, 1995
TO: File
FROM: Jeanette Stanley 9/lt,t,t7/t
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
SITE: Johnson Controls/ Globe Battery
NCD 000 770 487
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
On July 10, 1995, I spoke with Mr. Wade McDonald, Assistant Regional Engineer,
Winston-Salem Regional Office of NC DEM [phone]. We discussed the location of the
surface water intake on Salem Lake and the number of people served by this intake. Mr.
McDonald said that the intake is in the dam of the lake. It has never been located anywhere else
in the lake. He said that the entire city of Winston-Salem (estimated population of 250,000) is
served by this lake for most of the year. Salem Lake is exclusively used for Winston-Salem and
water from this lake is not sent to other communities for water supply. During dry seasons,
Winston-Salem can also receive water from an intake at Idols Dam on the Yadkin River. This
intake on the Yadkin River also serves the town of Clemmons.
There is a proposed new intake on the Yadkin River, about 2 miles north of highway 421.
This proposed new intake is located upstream of some problem areas.
On July 11, 1995, I talked with Sherri Knight, Regional Groundwater Supervisor, in the
same office. She said that they have no groundwater file on the above site. I also talked witli Mr.
Mike Mickey, Environmental Specialist, in the Water Quality Section of this office. He
recommended that I call the Winston-Salem Pretreatment Monitoring Section at [phone].
I spoke with Jane Pieczynski, Industrial Waste Control Chemist for the City of Winston-Salem.
She reviewed the files and provided me with the following information:
The land was purchased in 1976 and the City of Winston-Salem authorized construction
in October 1978.
The plant began producing batteries in August 1979.
The facility has operated .a wastewater pretreatment facility since August 1979 which
remained the same unit until it was updated in 1994. The last 6 months of 1994 indicated
that the wastewater received by the City of Winston-Salem was an average of 0.0243 mg/L
of lead, or an average of(j.015 pounds/day at current t1ow.
1
• -·<0_::~1:P-.~f~::~\ ,.-..-; ,. ) "\".,.. .• _:;, ' ' -,,,Q"'-,s~1 f\•l~---•• "." ~-\ '• ... ' ,> 'O' 'V ,,,-,. " r::1, \,-::-·'.\J · .. · " .:,.<. \~.;,:•.~:~::~:::•;_ .. /
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 · Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Ms. Helene Kasser
Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc.
9001 Edmonston Road
Greenbelt, Maryland 20770
January 31, 1992
RE: Comments for Johnson Controls/ Globe Battery Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina NCD 000.770 487
Dear Ms. Kasser:
William L. Meyer
Director
Please find enclosed comments to the Phase II, Screening Site Investigation Report for the subject site.
Additionally, please find the following items enclosed:
A copy of the NCSS samples' analysis results;
A site map showing the property boundaries (1"=200');
A copy of Appendix A, Figure 2, showing the location of the surface water and sediment samples collected by the NCSS.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone]. imly ,~. dJ!,
Harv~ Allen, PE
Environmental Engineer
Enclosures
An Equal Opporrunity Affirmative Action Employer
•
COMMENTS FOR JOHNSON CONTROLS/ GLOBE BATTERY (NCD 000 770 487)
1. Executive Summary: This section states that the City of Walkertown serves approximately 12700 people. Reference 22 states 1270 people. Reference 21 uses 12700 people. Please correct these contradicts and any other corrections necessary as a result of these changes.
2. Section 2.2.2: This section states that the one-acre site includes a manufacturing building with administrative offices (Refs. 4, 14). The site is believed to be significantly larger than this. Please find enclosed, a map showing the site boundaries. The map scale is 1"=200'. Additionally, Reference 14 makes no mention of this information. Please correct this information throughout the text, SI Form, etc.
3. Section 3.2.1: This section states that Salem Lake is used for recreational fishing (Ref. 2). This reference makes no mention of this fact. Please correct.
4. Section 3.4: This section states that the City of Walkertown obtains drinking water from the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County municipal system as a backup. Since this system is obviously maintained on a regular basis, the City of Walkertown population must be included when identifying surface water targets. Please correct all applicable sections.
5. Section 3.4: Same comment as for Executive Summary.
6. Section 3.4: This section states that the nearest private well is located approximately 1500 feet east of the facility (Ref. 13). During an offsite recon of the area during the Phase II, SSI, a private well was identified closer to the site. This well is directly due east of the site. Please find enclosed, a copy of Appendix A, Figure 2, showing the location of this well. Please correct.
7. The location of the surface water and sediment samples shown on Appendix A, Figure 2, are incorrect. Please fihd enclosed, a copy of Appendix A, Figure 2, showing the location of the surface water and sediment samples. Please correct. These. samples are not upgradient and/or downgradient of each other, but I feel conclusions can be drawn from their results.
-1-
0
8. It is believed that the following correction needs to be
made to Appendix A, Table 2:
The concentration of llJ ppb of methylene chloride
for sample JCSS02 should be for acetone for this
same sample.
9. Please adhere to the criteria for observed releases.
10. All target analysis figures which were derived using the
1980 census figures must be updated using the 1990 census
figures.
11. Please provide PREscore for this site.
-2-
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION 11Js;;r 'Elv11,,n n
SUPERFUND SECTION Y\11..'U D ff...U
CERCLA
Chain of Custody Record OC I '·' 1991
Hazardous Waste Materials SUPERFUNDSECT/ON
Location of Sampling: _LGenerator
Treatment Facility
--Disposal Facility
Other:
Transporter
--Storage Facility
--Landfill
-----------------
Company Is Name,ToJ.iNsoN
. •-r'fY< I/ :PZ v .
C'ol):dsDl 5 C'.~L06f-Bm Telephone: __ _
Address 4 O:::AlSTPA.1 ti::; a e__.
Collector• s Name ~!
· signatµre
Telephone: q I~
Date Sampled_,,~~--J~·~6~--q,_,_/ _________ Time Sampled ____ -___ _
Type of Process Generating Waste _________________ _
Field Information: -------------------------
•JAe-t"-.-J>-.J ;::) ~ .. : ,....,
signature title inclusive dates
title date
Instructions: Complete all applicable information including
signatures, and submit with analysis request forms.
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
SUPERFUND SECTION
CERCLA
Receipt for Samples
The samples descr:ibed below were collected in connection with the
administration, enforcement, and documentation of the:
() North Carolina Hazardous Waste Management Rules, 10 NCAC lOF
( ) North Carolina Solid Waste Management Rules, 10 NCAC lOG
() Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Lia_bility Act (CERCLA) ..
Toxic substances ·control Act (.TSCA) .15, u. s. c:·, ·§ 2'601. et. sea. ,
specifically Section 11 of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2610.
Inspector's Name Inspector's Address
Name of Firm Firm Address
Firm Owner, Operator, or Agent Title
SAMPLE COLLECTED SAMPLE TYPE DUPLICATE SAMPLES SAMPLE LOCATION
NUMBER DATE:TIME WATER:sorL:OTHER
.
Receipt for the sample(s) described
above is hereby acknowledged:;,
Signature of Inspector . .
Title
OFFRD:ACCPT:REJECTED ON.-SITE: OFF-SITE
,\ . . . . .
' ..
• ,.
'
'
Receipt/reJection of duplicate or
split samples is hereb~ acknowledged:
Signature of Firm Owner, ,Operator,
or Agent
Title
COMMENTS:~-------------------------'--------------
I
N.C. Oepart~ent or Environment,
llcalth, & Natural Resources
Solid Waste Management Division
.AMPLE ANALYSIS REQUEST. t.,j1,.;;" , lil,•!f!l,\!g_'l/O{l' _or Pub He Health
V 'f&\~11~~1lm1ngton Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
r.~--·• 1oa1 uLJ I l) ..,..,.J
Sile Number ,J ':f]) O () O '7 '7 0 , ':I: 3'. 1 Field Sample Number O / ~s1 ~ QN
f;f/tlzP...y ..JJrJ. _ sortRFON 7; 1
Name of Site Job YJ,So,,) C-onrcols C-rlo he.. Site Location l.uIAlsTvrd-5B:b-Er() NC-}
Collected By -/JAP. vf~ A-LL£ A.) ID# 1 (o Date Collected G:, -~ S' -9 / Time I · I D p. r,1. ,
Agency: Hazardous Waste Solid Waste ~Superfund TCLP Compounds --
Sample Type Inorganic Compounds Results(mg/1)
Environmental Concentrate Comments ./,Arsenic -L.. 0-o:;).
---;:7 Barium D,,.("]
_ Ground water (1) _ Solid (5) SE-b --Sfls!II± -I c/ Cadmium "--O _ o'?-.
r.,J D R.G-('riJ. c/ Chromium .t_o _ l 0
Surface water (2) _Liquid (6) ,,2, :if! m1..., ✓ Lead \ :\ '-\ -'.c:J ✓Mercury ""'-O ... oa....
Soil (3) Sludge (7) :::2_,selenium L.o-Cd-
✓ Silver -'-Q. ,o L Other (4).5£~!_ Other (8) -----
Organic Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry --
Parameter Results(mg/1) Parameter Results.(mgffl(mg/kg) Organic Compounds Results(mg/1)
_P&T:GC/MS -/ Arsenic <'i-o benzene ' --_ Acid:B/N Ext. -IL Barium ,;is· --carbon tetrachloride
MTBE ✓ Cadmium (/(;.. chlordane ----Chloride chlorobenzene ----4,S -L Chromium -chloroform
-__ Copper o-cresol --F1uoride m-cresol ---Iron __ p-cresol -
-.x:::_Lead l/7-CC cresol --
--__ Manganese -1,4-dichlorobenzene
--_LMercury < Q,l __ 1,2-dichloroethane
Nitrate __ 1,1-dichloroethylene -~ ./ Selenium __ 2,4-dinilrotoluene
_LSilver __ heptachlor
Radiochemistry Sulfates hexachlorobenzene ----Zinc hexachlorobutadiene
Results (PCl/1) ----Parameter _pH hexachloroethane -
_ Gross Alpha _ Conductivity __ methyl ethyl ketone
Gross Beta TDS nitrobenzene ---TOC _ pentachlorophenol ----_ pyridine
Microbiology --__ tetrachloroethylene
--__ trichloroethylene
Parameter Results (Col/lOOml) __ 2,4,5-trichlorophenol --__ 2,4,6-trichlorophenol ---__ vinyl chloride ---endrin -lindane
Date Received Reported by _ methoxychlor
__ toxaphene
Dale Extracted Date Reported _· 2,4-D
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Dale Analyzed Lab Number -
llllS 3191 (Revised 2/91) U i 2-! ;~u JUN 25 'i I
Collected By '/JA8, v'Eg A-UL N ID# 1 (12. Date Collected (.,;,-d{S'-~ I Time ,J :;i. ()f\M
I
Agency: Hazardous Waste · Solid Waste _..l,:~'.:)uperfund TCLP Compounds --
Sample Type ln?anic Compounds Results(mg/1)
Environmental Concentrate Comments Arsenic .L.. C -c,,;}._
--:7 Barium Q-]5
__ Ground water (1) _Solid (5) ~.Sb -tJ Q& Il:! -3 ✓Cadmium L..o.a8
.::C 10 D f(,C:,-ft D, 7 Chromium L □ t·,o
__ Surface water (2) Liquid (6) :l SQ rrl I v Lead L.e, _.50
' ✓ Mercury ""'--O.-o 3-,..
Soil (3) Sludge (7) ✓Selenium ""-c.-oj._ ✓ Silver L-0-10
1,/ Other (4)~Im £}JI Other (8) --------Organic Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry --
Parameter Results(mg/1) Parameter Results(mgfl) (mg/kg) Organic Compounds Results(mg/1)
--P&T:GC/MS ✓ Arsenic <l{, 0 benzene --
Acid:B/N Ext. ✓Barium 7:3 carbon tetrachloride
✓Cadmium --MTBE ,/(,.., chlordane ----Chloride chlorobenzene ----< ;2,.._ vChromium chloroform ------__ Copper o-cresol --Fluoride m-cresol ----
--Iron __ p-cresol
--✓Lead IS cresol --
--__ Manganese --1,4-dichlorobenzene
LMercury ~Q, t 1,2-dichloroethane
Nitrate __ 1,1-dichloroethylene --__.1::'.'.'Selenium ~ l-12. 2,4-dinitrotoluene
✓ Silver <20 __ heptachlor
Radiochemistry Sulfates hexachlorobenzene ----..... Zinc hexachlorobutadiene ----hexachloroethane Parameter Results (PCl/1) _pH --
__ Gross Alpha __ Conductivity __ methyl ethyl ketone
--Gross Beta TDS nitrobenzene --= pentachlorophenol TOC --__ pyridine --Microbiology --__ tetrachloroethylene
--__ trichloroethylene
Parameter Results (Col/lOOml) __ 2,4,5-trichlorophenol --__ 2,4,6-trichlorophenol ----
----__ vinyl chloride
endrin --lindane --
Dale Received Reported by __ methoxychlor
__ toxaphene
Date Extracted Date Reported 2,4-D
-2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Dale Analyzed Lab Number --
Ill IS 31'1I (Revised 2/91) Ul272l JUN26 ~ I
N.C. Department or Environment,
i lcr."lth, & Natural Resources
Solid Waste Management Division
State Laboratory or Public Health
P.O. Box 28047, 306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Site Number ,3 ':/: .b O O Q . ] '7 0 · ':f 8' 1 Field Sample Number ____ ~/_,,G,'--"'J_'l,,_~=-------
UI r, .s IZ y .Jrr V,
Name of Site Jo b tJ ,S O ,. ) L.n" rro ls C,.. l p be,. Site Location LdIAlsTVA / -58:b-En::J } NC-
/' 10 Collected By iJAP. vf:g A-LL£ N .
ID# 1 {o Date Collected Time
Agency: Hazardous Waste Solid Waste ~Superfund TCLP Compounds ----
Sample Type Inorganic Compounds Results(mg/1)
Environmental Concentrate Comments Arsenic --Barium
__ Ground water (1) Solid (5) ~ <; uJ -SQ !,!T 1-1 -1 _ Cadmiu/tn! -(l;R:: _
Cune-S
_ Chromi ~ti\QiE_[J
L Surface water (2) Liquid (6) Lead --JUL ~ 1 J!:!91 __ Mercury
Soil (3) _ Sludge (7) Selenium = Silver SUPERFONU SFCT(OriJ
_ Other (4) _ Other (8) ------Organic Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry --
Parameter Results(mg/1) Parameter Results(mg/l)(mg/kg) Organic Compounds Results(mg/1)
_P&T:GC/MS ✓ Arsenic <o,ot benzene
LBarium
--
_ Acid:B/N Ext. 0-09 carbon tetrachloride --
MTBE LCadmium <o ,OOJ~ chlordane ----Chloride chlorobenzene --<o.o~ --✓ Chromium chloroform ----
--__ Copper --o-cresol
Fluoride m-cresol ------
--Iron __ p-cresol
✓ Lead l o:rc cresol ------__ Manganese --1,4-dichlorobenzcne
--.-LMercury Lo_ o,·lQ,~ __ 1,2-dichloroethanc
Nitrate __ 1,1-dichloroethylene --<o.Q-~ ....IL. Selenium 2,4-dinitrotoluene
___.,cSilver __ heptachlor £ o.cz~
Radiochemistry --Sulfates hexachlorobenzene --
······-" Zinc hexachlorobutadiene ----Parameter Results (PCl/1) _pH hexachloroethane
--Gross Alpha __ Conductivity __ methyl ethyl ketone
Gross Beta TDS nitrobenzcne ----TOC __ pentachlorophenol --pyridine --Microbiology --__ tetrachloroethylene
--__ trichloroethylene
Parameter Results (Col/lOOml) __ 2,4,5-trichlorophenol --__ 2,4,6-tricWorophenol ----
----__ vinyl chloride
endrin --0/~/ lindane --Date Received Reported by __ methoxychlor
__ toxaphene
Dale Extracted Date Reported l 1. Tv ( "t: 5.' C. 2,4-D
I _ 2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Date Analyzed Lab Number
Ui2:Uj --Ill IS 3191 (Rc>iscd 2/91) . ' k CI JUI; t, / I
N,C. Department or Environment,
'I l<-"°alth, & Natural Resources
Solid Waste Management Division •
SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUESia
c..sRC..L~
State Laboratory or Public Health
P.O. Box 28047, 306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Site Number _J t.j-.b () () O . J '7 0 , ':f i '] Field Sample Number _____ /_(p~&.~8"~·7~----
UI t-r ZR. y .JrJ: V,
Name of Site Jo \, k'.l ,S O t, ) C,0 n \:ca ls C .,-I O b e. Site Location _ ___il.o.Y<...I""A"'ls"""-T-"'D.,_,/l..,_/ _·-~,5-"A_,.-,o/.-,,_F-a.11J...1J-'--,-LN,w.C"" __ _ }
Collected By -/JAB vc:g ft-LL£ tJ ID# 1 {,p Date Collected. _ _..,,G"----"'~.!C2>=:c-_-_9-'-'/--Time d._ ,' ;i._ [) p fY1
Agency: Hazardous Waste Solid Waste ~Superfund TCLP Compounds ----
Sample Type Inorganic Compounds Resulls(mg/1)
Environmental Concentrate Comments Arsenic --Barium
__ Ground water (1) Solid (5) S:IA.) -C::IQ&Tl-t -3 = ~:~:~~lttGt:uVt.b
/ Surface water (2) C.w,be...s. Liquid (6) Lead --JUt z !l 19'.:.il Mercury
_Soil (3) Sludge (7) --Seleniu;S = Silver UPERRINOSECIIUN
_ Other (4) Other (8) . ------Organic Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry --
Parameter Results(mg/1) Parameter Results(mg/l)(mg/kg) Organic Compounds Results(mg/1)
_P&T:GC/MS _1".'.:.Arsenic <'.o,o C benzene --_ Acid:B/N Ext. vBarium ~O-Q::j carbon tetrachloride
✓Cadmium (o, <'>O-l --MTBE chlordane ----Chloride chlorobenzene ----'-<'.'.'. Chromium <o.o~ --chloroform ----
--__ Copper o-cresol --Fluoride m•crcsol ----Iron --__ p-cresol
✓ Lead <2-◊o e cresol ----
--__ ·Manganese --1,4-dichloroben1.ene
--✓ Mercury L...02000')._ 1,2-dichloroethane
Nitrate --1,1-dichloroethylene --<' C2. ~Selenium (l :J 2,4-dinitrotoluene
Silver = heptachlor L.... o.os --Radiochemistry Sulfates hexachlorobenzene ----Zinc hexachlorobutadiene --Results (PCl/1) hexachloroethane Parameter _pH
__ Gross Alpha __ Conductivity = methyl ethyl ketone
Gross Beta TDS nitrobenzcne ------TOC __ pentachlorophenol ----__ pyridine
Microbiology --__ tetrachloroethylene
__ trichloroethylene --Parameter Results (Col/lOOml) __ 2,4,5-trichlorophenol --__ 2,4,6-trichlorophenol ----
--__ vinyl chloride --endrin --lindane --Date Received Reported by __ methoxychlor
__ toxaphene
Date ExtractcJ Date Reported 2,4-D = 2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Date Analy,.cd Lab Number
( \ I ·.} • I y --l)IIS 31'JI (Revised 2/91) JUN i.; ,__, J r._ J. I /
I
M.C., t)epartmcnt of Environment,
J lcalth, & Natural Resources
Solid Waste Management Division
• SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUES!!t
C.,&fZC...L ..
State Laboratory of Public Health
P.O. Box 28047, 306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Site Number 3 4-.b 6 () O . ] '7 0 ,. ':f: ~ '] Field Sample Number __ ----"'0'---'-/_>-/-_:__q!.....S/_'6__,_) ____ _
' l:Aff' ZR y Jrr V •
Name of Site Jo b l'l ,SO t, I Ca(\ tco ls C-r 10 b e. Site Location LJIAlsTDA I -5A-/...f,t1] N c_ }
Collected By '/Jff/{i/£JS-7f0J;...N-ID# 1 (o Date Collected. _ __.,,,(o"----"'.A:,..;C>=:c·-_-_9.L.· _./ __ Time /:/Op/l'\..
Agency: Hazardous Waste Solid Waste ~Superfund TCLP Compounds --
Sample Type Inorganic Compounds Results(mg/1)
Environmental Concentrate Comments Arsenic --Barium
.5Li J .S /21 !I I± I --Cadmium Kti :lt'..n~i ,,-, u __ Groundwater (1) _ Solid (5) ----Chromium
_L Surface water (2) \IQ A---(_ -: ) _ Liquid (6) Lead ,. \J 1~~1
Mercury
SUPtKtUl~IJ SH:rmru _ Soil (3) _ Sludge (7) -Selenium -Silver -_ Other (4) _ Other (8) --
--
--Organic Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry --
Parameter Results(mg/1) Parameter Results(mg/l)(mg/kg) Organic Compounds Results(mg/1)
.lL. P&T:GC/MS Arsenic benzene ----Acid:B/N Ext. Barium carbon tetrachloride ----MTBE Cadmium chlordane ------Chloride chlorobenzene -----Chromium chloroform ---__ Copper o-cresol ---Fluoride m-cresol ---
-Iron __ p-cresol --Lead cresol ---
--_Manganese --1,4-dichlorobenzene
--__ Mercury __ 1,2-dichloroethane
Nitrate __ 1,1-dichloroethylene ----Selenium 2,4-dinitrotoluene --Silver __ heptachlor --Radiochemistry Sulfates hexachlorobenzene ----Zinc hexachlorobutadiene ----Parameter Results (PCl/1) _pH_ hexachloroethane
_ Gross Alpha _ Conductivity __ methyl ethyl ketone
Gross Bela TDS nitrobenzene ----pentachlorophenol TOC ---__ pyridine
Microbiology --__ tetrachloroethylene
--__ trichloroethylene
Parameter Results (Col/lOOml) __ 2,4,5-trichlorophenol --2,4,6-trichlorophenol ---= vinyl chloride --endrin
(p }:J./.p}tJJ ~ Reported LLAvi J 7V~
1-lindane
Dale Received = methoxychlor
T l · :tl __ toxaphene
Date Exlrac!cd Date Re r!ed %-2---6 -"1 /' _· 2,4-D
f-;;;J.-Cfl -,u.v--912414 _ 2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Date Analyzed Lab Number --lll!S 3191 (Rcv;scd 2/91)
J
N.c.• Department or Environment,
I lcalth, & Natural Resources
Solid Waste Management Division
• SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUE. State Laboratory or Public Health
P.O. Box 28M7, 306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 C Sf\ C-L A-
Sile Number 34.b 000 . J '7 0 ,. ':{ 8' 1 Field Sample Number _____ /:....4-'-9'---"'ll-";2,:..,.._ ____ _
f:Ar, £/Z y ..Dr ,J.
Name of Site Jo b n .so ,, l Lon tea ls c7'. IO be. Site Location (JJIAlsTprd -5A:l--f t1J N c_ J
Collected By fJAP, Vf;:_11 A-LL.£. tJ ID# / (o Date Collected_---"G"---"'o<'-'S-=-· _-_9~/ __ Time
Agency: Hazardous Waste Solid Waste ~Superfund TCLP Compounds ----
Sample Type Inorganic Compounds Results(mg/1)
Environmental Concentrate Comments Arsenic --Barium Kt.(:lr' a \\H IF' fJ ri --
_ Ground water (1) _Solid (5) S1,J -Sol,(IH -I Cadmium • • ---.:i.. ,_ Chromium C: :.-i) ,., 10Gj _L, Surface water (2) '' --~ ~'
_Liquid (6) I Lead ;RNA...s = Mercury SUPERFllMn ~i:rrinM
_Soil (3) Sludge (7) Selenium -• " • '" --Silver --_ Other (4) _ Other (8) --
----Organic Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry --
Parameter Results(mg/1) Parameter Results(mg/l)(mg/kg) Organic Compounds Results(mg/1)
___ P&T:GC/MS Arsenic benzene ---L Acid:B/N Ext. Barium carbon tetrachloride ----MTBE Cadmium chlordane ------Chloride chlorobenzene -----Chromium chloroform ---
-_ Copper o-cresol --Fluoride m-cresol ---
-Iron __ p-cresol --Lead cresol -----
---Manganese 1,4-dichlorobenzene --
-__ Mercury __ 1,2-dichloroethane
-Nitrate __ 1,1-dichloroethylene -Selenium 2,4-dinitrotoluene -Silver = heptachlor --Radiochemistry Sulfates hexachlorobenzene ---······-Zinc hexachlorobutadiene --Parameter Results (PCl/1) _pH hexachloroethane
_ Gross Alpha _ Conductivity __ methyl ethyl ketone
Gross Beta TDS nitrobenzene --= pentachlorophenol TOC --
--__ pyridine
Microbiology --__ tetrachloroethylene
--__ trichloroethylene
Parameter Results (Col/lOOml) __ 2,4,5-trichlorophenol -__ 2,4,6-trichlorophenol ---
---__ vinyl chloride
endrin --42 ~ /J / 1f1!1 Reported by
lindane
Date Received --methoxychlor --toxaphcne
Dale Extracted 7-)t-q_; AA, BD Date Reported --2,4-D
6»_11 2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Date Analy,cd f{-ff.C,/ Lab Number 912415 -DIIS 3191 (Revised 2/91) i3/)
NiC., l'Jepartment or Environment,
I lcalth, & Natural Resources
Solid Waste Management Division
.SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUES-
C..s~c_Lr-+"'.
State laboratoty or Public Hcal!h
P.O. Box 28047, 306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Site Number _J4]) ,()() O . J '10 ,. ':f 8' '] Field Sample Number _____ L../_,'-f.____,q'-'-'-g--'3=------
. . tA t1" c:1<.. y .N ,.J,
NameofSiteJobn,sot,l Can\:rals C..-labe.. SiteLocation lµIAlsTvAl·:5/1·.LfttJ NC-}
Collected By ./JAB, v'[g A-1..U.. rJ ID# 1 (p Date Collected __ (,:;""---'~=-'=5'"'---_,_9_,/.__·'rime_~/ ·~· ~i 0=-IJ""m"' r .
Agency: Hazardous Waste Solid Waste _ _l,:~:)uperfund TCLP Compounds ----
Sample Type Inorganic Compounds Results(mg/1)
Environmental Concentrate Comments Arsenic --Barium rP/l,./1' •~Plln•.",
-5.Lb -,Spt rth I --Cadmium •<c,,~lbU I}' lb!YI __ Ground water (1) Solid (5) ---
1/f)A L/3/Jfb
Chromium ,-.. ·-:-, .. --__ Surface water (2) _ Liquid (6) Lead ,, ,,, I.:;~· I
I --
--Mercury ~IIDtOrmun ,,,__ .
_Soil (3) Sludge (7) Selenium -. _,., "'"" uCl,lfUIV --Silver --__L Other (4)..Sf.)>L/TVJ[_ Other (8) ------Organic Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry --
Parameter Results(mg/1) Parameter Results(mg/l)(mg/kg) Organic Compounds Results(mg/1)
✓ P&T:GC/MS Arsenic benzene ----~ Acid:B/N Ext. Barium carbon tetrachloride ----MTBE Cadmium chlordane ------Chloride chlorobenzene ------Chromium chloroform ------
----Copper o-cresol --Fluoride m-cresol ----
--Iron __ p-cresol --Lead cresol ------
--__ Manganese --1,4-dichlorobenzene
--__ Mercury __ 1,2-dichloroethane
Nitrate __ 1,1-dichloroethylene ----Selenium 2,4-dinitrotoluene --Silver __ heptachlor --Radiochemistry Sulfates hexachlorobenzene ----···•··-··--Zinc hexachlorobutadiene ----Parameter Results (PCl/1) _pH hexachloroethane
__ Gross Alpha __ Conductivity __ methyl ethyl ketone
Gross Beta TDS nitrobenzene ------pentachlorophenol TOC ----__ pyridine
Microbiology --__ tetrachloroethylene
--__ trichloroethylene
Parameter Results (Col/lOOml) __ 2,4,5-trichlorophenol --
----2,4,6-trichlorophenol
----= vinyl chloride
endrin --
Date Received ~,Ji{, /tJ! ~eported by
lindane --__ methoxychlor
__ toxaphene
Date Extractc<l 6~/f 7!'2-]Ai /~ate Reported 2,4-0
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) &Jj (YT ( <l:12Al 6 Dale Analy,cd -/6..t}/ ii:-+1 ::91 Lab Number --IJIIS 3191 (llcv;scd 2/91) -ri-w-
N~C." 0epart!1"ent of Environment,
I lcalth, & Natural Resources
Solid Waste Management Division
• SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUES.
C,£-f\C-L A-
State Laboratory of Public Health
P.O. Box 28047, 306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 . . ' .
Site Number ,3 \,t..b , O O O . J '1 0 , . '± S 1 Field Sample Number ____ ~/_;./.,____,q-"I?.,__+..__ ____ _
bfir,zfl..y ..m:v,
NameofSiteJ:obn,sod·Can\:rols Crlobe. SiteLocation lµIAlsTv/l,/-.5A:l--[y(j NC.-}
Collected By -/JAB, v'[_g A:LU... N ID# 1 (p Date Collected __ &,""---'~"'--'=5''---...1.9....J/L-_.Time ,2 : ), Q a tYl , I
Agency: Hazardous Waste Solid Waste _J<'.:'.)uperfund TCLP Compounds --
Sample Type Inorganic Compounds Results(mg/1)
Environmental Concentrate Comments Arsenic --Barium
Ground water (1) ..S:1.:1)-N 0(3-r-1:J --Cadmium \iit'.11_:iFiiMlr"ll JJ _Solid (5) -,3 --Chromium ✓ Surface water (2) Liquid (6) VOA---Lead 3 .~ p --I' 1on1
Mercury
SUP!:HHll\lfl sr=r.nnlll Soil (3) _Sludge (7) --Selenium --Silver -.. --_ Other (4) _ Other (8) ----
--Organic Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry --
P✓meter Results(mg/1) Parameter Results(mg/l)(mg/kg) Organic Compounds Results(mg/1)
P&T:GC/MS Arsenic benzene ----_ Acid:B/N Ext. Barium carbon tetrachloride ----MTBE Cadmium chlordane ------Chloride chlorobenzene ------Chromium chloroform ------
--__ Copper o-cresol --Fluoride m-cresol ----
--Iron __ p-cresol --Lead cresol ------
----Manganese --1,4-dichlorobenzene
--__ Mercury 1,2-dichloroethane
--Nitrate __ 1,1-dichloroethylene --Selenium __ 2,4-dinitrotoluene --Silver __ heptachlor --Radiochemistry Sulfates hexachlorobenzene ----···•··-Zinc hexachlorobutadiene ----Results (PCl/1) Parameter _pH hexachloroethane
__ Gross Alpha __ Conductivity = methyl ethyl ketone
Gross Beta TDS nitrobenzene ------pentachlorophenol TOC --
--__ pyridine
Microbiology --__ tetrachloroethylene
--__ trichloroethylene
Parameter Results (Col/lOOml) __ 2,4,5-trichlorophenol ------2,4,6-trichlorophenol
----= vinyl chloride
endrin --
re,b ~/91 q@1 Reported by
lindane
Date Received = methoxychlor
__ toxaphene
Date Extracted Date Reported 2,4-D
'6', ;)..;1.-C/ ' ~ 91Z•l1? _ 2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Dale Analyzed Lab Number --IJIIS 3191 (Revised 2/91)
r--i•.c Department of Environment,
I lcalth, & Natural Resources
Solid Waste Management Division
• SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUES.
L.-& i<_, C, L A-
State Laboratory of Public Health
P.O. Box 28047, 306N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
---Site Number .3 4 .b O Q Q . ] '1 0 , . ':{: 8' '] Field Sample Number ____ _,/c...lf_,_9-1--'x:'."-""-;>,,__ ____ _
l:AH" ,9Z y .Jrr V,
Name or Site Job YJS0,., l Lon rco ls C-r Ip be-Site Location i.JI.1,l.sTpA/ -,58:1--l t1] N c__ )
Collected By iJAfl, vtg EtLL&rJ ID# 1 (12. Date Collected w -~s--2 l Time .:J .. ,:;;-, •..•
•
Agency: Hazardous Waste Solid Waste __ k:'.'.'.)uperfund TCLP Compounds ----
Sample Type Inorganic Compounds Results(mg/1)
Environmental Concentrate Comments Arsenic
__ Barium ~t.U" """· " _ Ground water (1) _ Solid (5) 5idl -1:,\DBil-l -3 _ Cadmium lbU ~y Ji;;:.fUI ·
Lsurface water (2)
.;J._-/_ I --Chromium ,:-..
_Liquid (6) :R cl A--> Lead -..: '·· !
. \) I\..', , 1 1 ........ }
_Soil (3) _ Sludge (7)
MercurySUPfRFi""·-. = Selenium UIUU.ltli!HIIIJ
Silver --_ Other (4) _ Other (8) ------Organic Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry -
Parameter Results(mg/1) Parameter Results(mg/1) (mg/kg) Organic Compounds Results(mg/1)
P&T:GC/MS Arsenic benzene
✓ Acid:B/N Ext. ----Barium carbon tetrachloride· ----MTBE Cadmium chlordane -----Chloride chlorobenzene ----Chromium chloroform -----
-__ Copper o-cresol --Fluoride m-cresol ---Iron __ p-cresol ----Lead cresol -----
--__ Manganese --1,4-dichlorobenzene
-__ Mercury 1,2-dichloroethane
--Nitrate __ 1,1-dichloroethylene -Selenium 2,4-dinitrotoluene --Silver __ heptachlor --Radiochemistry Sulfates hexachlorobenzene ----Zinc hexachlorobuladiene --Parllmeter Results (PCl/1) hexachloroelhane _pH
_ Gross Alpha __ Conductivity = methyl ethyl ketone
Gross Bela TDS nitrobenzcne ---= pentachlorophenol TOC --__ pyridine
Microbiology ----telrachloroethylene
--__ trichloroethylene
Parameter Results (Col/lOOml) --__ 2,4,5-trichlorophenol
---__ 2,4,6-lrichlorophenol
---__ vinyl chloride
endrin --
Dale Received' ~/:J.(p}f_!/tr/'( lindane --Reported by __ melhoxychlor r 1 __ toxaphene
Dale Exlraclc<l 7.,16 .qt_ /JfJ,, 8/J Dale Reported 2,4-D
,BtJ ll 912418 _ 2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
Dale Analyzed f{-f(o--'J/ Lab Number --DI IS 3191 (Revised 2/91) :,0
-
r-:.c: bcpart~cnt or Environment,
I lcalth, & Natural Resources
Solid Waste Management Division
• SAMPLE ANALYSIS REQUES. State Laboratory or Public Health
P.O. Box 28047, 306 N. Wilmington Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 C-Sf<,L1-A-
Site Number ,J 4]) O () O . J '7 0 , tj 8' 1 Field Sample Number / 1./ q <z (o
t1trrc;rzy .Jrrl/.
Name of Site J:o b r),5Q "l Con tea ls C,-1 Q be. Site Location LJIAlsTvAI -50::/--:ft:O N c_ J
Collected By -/JA8, v',% A-LL& tJ ID# 1 (p Date Collected_-=(o'---',;?""--"S-'---..... 9_/.___ Time ,-2 ; ,;J, 0 aro. '
Agency: Hazardous Waste Solid Waste ~Su perfund TCLP Compounds ----
Sample Type Inorganic Compounds Results(mg/1)
Environmental Concentrate Comments Arsenic --Barium W~i;rc.H ,,, ,i::u --_ Ground water (1) _ Solid (5) S~ll -61nRTt--l -,j Cadmium --Chromium
v'Dft l.BAJ~ --Lead ·, ~-I-' l '.:;':_.: ! _ Surface water (2) _ Liquid (6) ~ ~-I)
I --Mercury Slircnruivu :St:t;IIIIN _Soil (3) _Sludge (7) --Selenium --Silver L Other (4)56film£/J_L_ Other (8) ---
----Organic Chemistry Inorganic Chemistry -
Parameter Results(mg/1) Parameter Results(mg/l)(mg/kg) Organic Compounds Results(mg/1)
✓ P&T:GC/MS Arsenic benzene
✓ Acid:B/N Ext. --Barium --carbon tetrachloride --Cadmium --MTBE chlordane ----Chloride chlorobenzene ---Chromium · chloroform -----
-__ Copper o-cresol -Fluoride m-cresol ---Iron __ p-cresol ---Lead cresol ---
-_Manganese --1,4-dichlorobenzene .
-__ Mercury 1,2-dichlorocthane
Nitrate = 1,1-dichloroethylene --Selenium 2,4-dinitrotoluene --Silver __ heptachlor --Radiochemistry Sulfates hexachlorobenzene ---······-·· Zinc hexachlorobutadiene --Paramt'ter Results (PCl/1) _pH hexachloroethane
-Gross Alpha -Conductivity __ methyl ethyl ketone
Gross Beta TDS nitrobenzcne ---= pentachlorophenol TOC ' ----__ pyridine
Microbiology --__ tetrachloroethylene
--__ trichloroethylene
Parllmeter Results (Col/lOOml) _2,4,5-trichlorophenol -2,4,6-trichlorophcnol ---= vinyl chloride ---endrin --lindane
Date Received &,M,{p f qf q/!'flJ Reported by :---methoxychlor
1;!in I ~ __ toxaphene
2,4-D Date Extracted 7--2-J~'fl Date Reported
8#11 /JI 912419 _ 2,4,5-TP (Silvcx)
Date Analyzed 89?-'t( R-2 J :-9 I Lab Number -Ill IS 3191 (Revised 2/91) '1Wr'
-' ' •
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
SUPERFUND SECTION
Chain of Custody Record
Hazardous Waste Materials
Location of Sampling: / Generator
__ Treatment Facility
__ Disposal Facility
Other:
CERCLA
__ Transporter
__ Storage Facility
Landfill ..
-\hf If' «_:f ~ ~J fF LJ
Company' s Name :::SDtl N,$00
-:n~y ..l>J., ~'-
C'D/\hf,QLS C.,.U,e,f Telephone : ___ ,---c:"7·p
Address SUPERF/1 n SFr.TIQN
Date Sampled __ ~l~,--~~=s~-~9~1 _______ Time Sampled ___ -____ _
Type of Process Generating Waste. ~-----------------
Field Information: ------------------~------
Field Sample No. /'-/9'it/ /'i:98,;i. l':/9ll3 i'f't~t/ l':/9'6,'L l'-19<t/o •
c~fin of Ptfflflssion:
ffl ad fQ ,~ ~. ,
_ _ ~gnature .
~asi~
t; tle
Cio@,;d,-
title
l )v.;-/41 -(4{,/4 I
fuciusivedates
ro ),2(p)91
i.hcl6.sive dates
signature title inclusive dates
title date
Instructions: Complete all applicable information including
signatures, and submit with analysis request forms.
• • SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
SUPERFUND SECTION
CERCLA
Receipt for Samol~s
The samples. described below were collected in connection with the
administration, enforcement, and documentation of the:
( ) North Carolina Hazardous Waste Management Rules, 10 NCAC l0F
( ) North Carolina Solid Waste Management Rules, 10 NCAC l0G
( ) Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA) . .
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) .15 u.s.c. §2601. et.seq.,
specifically Section 11 of TSCA, 15 U.S.C. § 2610. ·
. Inspector's Name Inspector's Address
Name of.Firm Firm Address
Firm Owner, Operator, or Agent Title
SAMPLE COLLECTED SAMPLE TYPE DUPLICATE SAMPLES SAMPLE LOCATION
NUMBER DATEiTIME WATERiSOILiOTHER OFFRDiACCPTiREJECTED ON.-SITE: OFF-SITE
;.
Receipt for the sample(s) described
above is hereby acknowledged:
Signature of Inspector
Title
.
Receipt/reJection of duplicate or
split samples is hereby acknowledged:
Signature of Firm Owner, Operator,
or Agent
Title
COMMENTS:_--'--------------------------~----------
BASE/NEUTRAL AND ACID
EXTRACTABLES
COMPOUND
\
N-nifrosodimethvlamine .
bisf2'-Chloroethvllether
2-chloroohenol
ohenol '\
1.3-<lichlorobenzene
• STATE LABORATORY Of PUBLIC HEAL-DIVISION Of HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARTMENT Of HUMAN RESOURCES P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILHINGTON, ST., RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
,c.. ~D-') ½111-N 0W 'ORGANIC CHEMICAL ANALYSIS l'..E!)<;ll
LAB NO 717.J°,fi, '-f /:J <II I A '---" ;.::nJ i 9 C/f.:JJ., 'l'-t'
FIELD # -;t;q K,'1 /'-I< S'3 /U'fJ'S-l'-1 , x,;,
TYPE ( ~\ ( L •l ( ;:. l (' l
UNITS ••"/] '··-"--mo':lt' un/ko un/1 --1,._ ..,,..,., --~/kn'I
/()/ '", -i' I ( A -
c::;,\·r).1 <6-CJD 1: <, I I\ I
SEJ DI
it\0
( l ( l
""/1 ··"/ko un/ 1 un/ko
. •,. n·· ., -.. -
~II. _.IE_ tl ~N IF a JJ
1 4-<lichlorobenzene : i:· i) i' 1 (: C 1
1.2-<lichlorobenzene
bis(2-chloroi llether
hexachloroethane
N-nltroso-di-n-nrmvlamlne
nitrobenzene
i<nnhorone
2-nitrnnhenol
2.4-<limethvlohenol
bis(2-chloroethoxvlmethane
2.4-<lichloroohenol
1.2.4 trichlorobenzene
n•nhthalene
hexachlorobutadiene
4-chloro--<n-Cresol
hexachlorocvclnnPntadiene
2 4.6-trichlornnhenol
2-chloron>nhthalene
acenaohthvlene
dimethyl ohthalate
2.6-<linitrotoluene
acen•nhthene
2.4-<linitrnnhenol
2 4-<linitrotoluene
4-nitroohenol
fluorene
4-chloroohenvlnhenvlether
diethvl ohthalate
4.6-<linitro--o-cresol
diohenvlamine
azobenzene
4-IJrrnwv>henvlohenvlether
hexachlorobenzene
=ntachlornnhenol
ohenanthrene
anthracene
dibutvl ohthalate
fl uoranthene
J -Estimated value.
sa 1 h50
10' ~=to
<CQ/ ,_co
IOI •30
,·
SO' 11,,,;n
,, ,
tn,'.330
'O'"~" soi, 't.5"0 ,,, / :i:io
,,
ml)L
/-1-,_0/.SO/J,..
-.., . 0 IC/
I,(.-
' I . ';{. 0 /(',
ilL-
,
' 7-1,, I ./
=?~o,,.·'
. ~ -., .;//~7 I
,
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
::,m !:t<tlll\111 SH'.l
'
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U -llaterial was analyzed for but not detected. The nl.llber
NA -Not analyzed,
is the Hininun Detection Limit. mXJL ---
1/ -Tentative identification.
~I -On NRDC List of Priority Pollutants.
N.C. v;_v-<-6,i.on 06 He.a.Uh SeJtv,;,c.u
VHS 3068-0 {4/86 Labo~a,to~y)
-
.
nru -.
BASE/NEUTRAL ANO ACID
EXTRACT ABLES
CXJl1POONO
ovrene
benzidine
butvl benzvl ohthalate
benz(a)anthracene
chrvsene
• • STATE LABORATOOY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION Of HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARTMENT Of HUMAN RESOORCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. WILMINGTON, ST., RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
OOGANIC Q-IEMICAL ANALYSIS
LAB NO I U l.;2 '/J. ~ '-1 I .J. (/. / &, qJ,2'-1-I~ q/,:J. </-/9
FIELD# I tJ.' ~..2. /V4f/3 If/, 'If?, /l/'/1'/,;
TYPE (_ , ) ( </ l t _:i l ( U l
UNITS un/ l L,..,._ un-rr rn/ko oon/1 ~ I~' un/kn
/0/_:p,, ' l.7o(5'/ (A 1-r----:--
l_<;n /ti.SO IL_
101.:1::,0 1/1..--
r?OO ,,,-~t . , 1,,r;,3 / u .,
( l ( \
""/ l ··"/ko un/I un/kn
0 U :IP fi \\U Ir I 1J --~ ....
3 3-dichlorobenzidine S-0 1 IL.r., • L<....-< ;:-:'") " 10( 1 I,
bi s(2-ethvl hexvl \ nhtha late 1()/330 'f.fnt;;J.3 /
di-n-octvl ohthalate 10/.J.::/o , u__ ~Ill J:Dl=II N n ~tf'l
benzo(b)fluoranthene so /Jj,,',/'] / t-l_ "7/ . -.
benzo(klfluoranthene U.
ben zo (a) ovrene Jt._-nk/
indeno(l .2 3--cdlnvrene I _c-n le:'./
dibenzo(a h)an'thracene , J ,,,lJ "'/ ,
benzo(o h. i lnPrvlene \ I I -c-,-, ..-' • '
ani 1i ne <o h1,,,:-c I . vL. v<--vL.
benzoic acid
benzvl alcohol
4--chloroaniline '-,,, ' dibenzofuran '" -~ _·;;( '?o v .,I
2-methvl=nhthalene IA.-
2-methvl pheno 1
4-methvlohenol ,J,
2-nitroani line s-01,1_,;o
3--nitroani line
4-nitroani 1 ine
2.4.5-trichloroohenol ~, ,1 ' / \
,
\ I
·~
fl'l1)L.
J -Estimated value. H:z.0/ Si,//...
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L -Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U -Material was analyzed for but not detected. The nurocr is the MinilTUT\ Detection Limit.
NA -Not analyzed.
1/ -Tentative identification.
~/ -On NROC List of Priority Pollutants.
N. C. D.i.v.v.,.i.011 o 6 fiea.U:h Sv,_v.i.c.e,;
OHS 3068-0 14/86 Labofl.LL.to~y)
---------· 1n111 ..... -
•
i
! • . • .... • •
PURGEASLE CXJMPOUNDS
COMPOOIID
chloro-rethane
brcmcmethane
dichlorodifluorcxrethane
vinvl chloride
chloroethane
methvlene chloride
trichlorofluorcxrethane
ethene. 1. 1-dichloro
ethane. I. 1-dichloro-
1 2-trans-dichloroethene
chlorofonn
ethane 1 2-dichloro-
ethane, 1. l. 1-trichloro-
carbontetrachloride
brorodichloromethane
prooane. 1.2-dichloro-
I 3-trans-dichlo, ne
trichloroethvlene
chlorodibroiorethane
benzene
ethane. 1 1.2-trichloro-
1 3-ds-dichlo, ne
2-chloroethvl vinvl ether
brorofonn
ethane. 1. 1. 2 2-tetrachloro-
ethene. tetrachloro-
toluene
ch 1 orobenzene
ethvlbenzene
acetone
2-butanone
carbondi sulfide
2-hexanone
4-<rethvl-2 =ntanone
stvrene
vinvl acetate
xvlenes l'td-ai)
J -Estunated value.
STATE LNJORATOOY Of l'UULIC HEALTH
DIVISION Of HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPAATl<l:NT Of HUMAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047 -306 N. l<ILMINGTON, ST., RALEIGH, N.C. 21611
OOGANIC CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
LAB NO Q 124/Li YI '71+//n 9174/7 OJ?l.l/9
I 4-CI'('/ I Llr11?,:,, / l./qfi'-1 I ·-~ FIELD #
TYPE ( ;'l_ ) ( /.J.) C Ll. ( 4 )
UNITS /ua/l)uo/kq .. n/) K.n/koY ,u'Q/[)uo/kq uo/ 1 (iiq/kq ·
,o ......... i:J II (A_. Ll..-" -
5 Anh
' .s-a •1 " u \ t:b.~I
.
',.., I-' ~ ~-
------· .:> ,rtnru
. /
10 n,,h
J;
5'Mh
'
, ' ,J ' ·, /
/0 A-L.. ,. 10:.r. r' LL L,L.--
to' L,L
!i
10
10
,;
,o
5 , ,/ ,v ./ ' /
'/TVIJ')I .T
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given.
{ )
uo/1 uo/kq
·. PnaJL.n n
"'U 'iJ lbl!#
, .. -.
\) I:;::; I
.. --.... ---~-lU .:>tlillU11
L -Actual value· is known to be greater than value given.
U -llaterial was analyzed for but not detected. The nurber is the Mininun Detection Limit.
NA -Not analyzed.
1/ -Tentative identification. fl -On NROC List of Priority Pollutants.
C --:,·,,:5PECT LAB C:ONTAM1NATION.
N.C. Division of llealth Services
Dl!S 3068--0 (s/86 Laboratory)
( )
""' I .. n/ko
,, " '
r I : ~ ~ .,
"' ,, ' ·:~:1,
,,,
''
,·\ ,I, ,1,_1_/!Jf·'.:,.
,·-1 :ii( '\ :1
•" •~N•,'.:::;: ..
T , .. ,
:_...-,~%~_
/'-'/ "")"'"~l\ .,, r; ; "-'J:,
!·.s '@' r1·r~,<'. t c;1 .:s ··:., I?; ~§ ,;< r . ) ;:1. ~.::::: :;,,,· ~ ··~=---....
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, _and Natural Resources
· Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 · Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Mr. Fred Overstreet
May 30, 1991
Director, Division of Environmental Health
Forsyth County Health Department
Post Office Box 686
Winston-Salem, NC 27102-0686
RE: Screening Site Investigation
[Jolinson_Controls..Glooe.Baffery 1
G:. . -· ")" ,NCI)0007.70!+87.,
Dear Mr. Overstreet:
William L. Meyer
Director
David Lilley of the NC Superfund Section spoke with Johnnie King of your office
today to notify you that the NC Superfund Section's contractors will conduct a screening site
investigation of the subject site located in Forsyth County, North Carolina. The
investigation will be conducted on June 25, 1991 by Billy Dixon of Greenhorne and O'Mara,
Inc.
The purpose of the investigation is to determine if the site poses a hazard to public
health or the environment because of releases of contaminants to soil, surface water,
groundwater, or air. The investigation team will take samples on and around the site to
determine if a hazardous condition exists. Additionally, they will locate all nearby water
supplies (surface and groundwater, community and private) and any close sensitive
environments, schools, and day care centers.
This investigation is not an emergency situation but is a normal step in the evaluation
of all uncontrolled and unregulated potential hazardous waste sites in North Carolina. You
may want to have your representative meet the investigation team at the site. If so, please
contact Bill Piske at [phone] and he will coordinate a meeting. l am enclosing
background data. on the site for your information.
Mr. Overstreet
5-30-91
Page 2.
• •
If the investigation indicates the need for future study of the site, we will contact your
office to advise. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call David Lilley or me
at [phone].
Enclosures
cc: Dexter Matthews
Doug Holyfield
Steve Reid
Patricia Bowden
Ann Rudd
David Lilley
File
?J:Nd/_-
lr~~er Nicholson, He,aU
Contracts Management Branch
Superfund Section ·
4I Federal •
Trip Notific;ition & Authorization
Today's Date:--$/4-!-
• Csc Black Ink or Typcwril<:r only-S1;1ff to fill oul first 2 blorks r111ly.
Site 11-ip
Date of Trip:
lf'lrip cbte changed or cancelled note below:
Trip Date Changed To: _____ Cancelled:
Name of Hotel (Overnight Trip): ________ Hotel Telephone Numl er: ( )
Authorized by:
Pr()J·ect Te,·1111 L0 ,·1cle1··. 12 ' (\ l-. . ~ V1 u 1)1:wv,, \ I
Assistants: ~ {l[leh I Ness
Attach To Notification Form: J copy each: Preliminary Assessment Form (First page only)
Submit to the Site Map
Industrial Hygienist PATransmittal Letter
(!'lease lis1 appropriate Cou111y J Jc;i\11_l l)c,par!111c11t co111:ict 1x:r.;on tu c:111 lo advise of trip) l>tr ee-h,r /)/v.
Environmental Supcrviso't'. or Health Director to call: fr:_et:L_OYu.:.he-e-f--Title: of Env..1e"-di-
(No1c if Dr., /\1.l'., etc.)
Notes: Health Department ()ffici;1I Contacted: _JjAJVD.Y?_fGn_~
lfack Up Letter l,cq1mcd: Yes _.,.,.c:: No __ /
//Jal:£:~L/rls. ~;°"' 5-"Jo-'IC {[2t.)
• .-<:"~.
;;~'~-~·~"' "\ ~-
' ,~· .. , .,-:.. t ,:; ·• :-J~i_ -\:, l• ,.· : ·"-.!Ji,•,' ~v -:,,,. .,
~
'lJ:· I '"'"'9"". ' ::•~ <l<J•" .,. •• , -~-
State of North Carolina
-
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 · Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
April 26, 1991
Mr. Van Sullivan
Johnson Controls, Inc.
P.O. Box 1002
Old Greensboro Road
Winston-Salem, NC 27102
RE: Johnson Controls Inc., Globe.Battery Div.
NCD 000 770 487
Screening Site Investigation
William L. Meyer
Director
As per our telephone conversation of April 22, 1991, the EPA
has directed the North Carolina Superfund Section to perform a
Screening Site Investigation at your facility. As discussed,
I will be at your sites on June 25, 1991, along with our
contractor, Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc. to take environmental
media samples. These samples will consist basically of the
following:
Two to four ground water samples from temporary hand
augured wells or onsite monitoring wells, if applicable;
Two to four soil samples;
Two nearby surface water samples, if applicable; and
Two sediment samples from nearby surface waters, if
applicable.
Also, as discussed, the purpose of the Screening Site
Investigation is to determine if there have been releases of
hazardous contaminants to the environment, and therefore,
whether the site may pose a threat to human health or the
environment.
-1-
An Equal Opporrunity Affirmative Action Employer
--
Thank you for your cooperation and if you have any further
questions, please call me at [phone].
~;'µ U1L
Harvey H. Allen, PE
cc: Bill Piske, Greenhorne & O'Mara
-2-
... • UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION IV
FEB 1 5 1991
4WD-WPB
Mr. Harvey Allen
345 COURTLAND STREET. N.E.
ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30365
Waste Management Division
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Allen:
Attached is the rP.vised list of sites that are being reassigned
to the State Contracting Program. The previous list mailed to
you is not accurate. Please note the changes. Also, please
note that the McRay Street Landfill is being done by the State
Program
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
Sincerely yours,
/~~
Kelly Cai:n
Project Officer
Enclosure
cc: Pat DeRosa
Grover Nicholson
Printed on Req'Cfed Paper
SITES
Caro Knit 'k-
BEIi TRANSFERRED FROM
Fieldcress Mills/Blanket Mill
Georgia Pacific-Hardwood Sawmill
Georgi.a Pacific-Hardwood Sawmill
Georgia-Pacific -Hardwood Sawmill
High Point City Landfill
g§linson Contr_ol,s ·c,;1ob_e Battery
Kern Rubber Co.-Urethane plant
Lackey Industrial Warehouse
McRae Street Landfill*
Milan Yard Landfill
Miller Brewing Co.
SCM Proctor-Silex
Scott Aviation of Monroe
Siernans-Alli, Inc
Singer Co Furniture
Squibb ER & Sons
Swannanoa Landfill
Texaco, Inc
Texaco, Inc
UNC Airport Road
Union Camp Corp
Union Camp Corp
Vaugh Basset Furniture Co
FIT TO -•rE PROGRAM
NCD 986 171 965 )<
NCD 003 218 203 ✓
NCD 000 773 515/
NCD 000 813 592 ./
NCD 000 773 507 _,,,
NCD 980 557 565 ./
[NCD O O o __ 7]0 _ 4 87-:;.,,
NCD 000 653 576,.,.
NCD 080 891 039 /
NCD 986 171 973 ~
NCD 980 503 031 _.,-
NCD 089 914 311_.,,
NCD 003 229 358 /
NCD 003 155 587:,.,.
NCD 067 428 821 _,,
NCD 098 765 506,.,.
NCD 991 278 730,.,.
NCD 980 557 987-
NCD 000 623 199,.,.
NCD 086 326 741 ,.,.-
NCD 980 557 615 _.,-
NCD 003 183 480 /
NCD 003 216 959 /
NCD 003 464 765 -
* SI will be performed by the State Program.
All others will be completed by the North Carolina contractor.
4WD-SISB
DATE:
Mr. Murray Warner
NUS corporation
1927 Lakeside Parkway
Tucker, Georgia 30084
Dear r11r. Warner:
REGIO~l IV
J..:5 COURTLAND STREET. N.E.
ATLANTA. GEORGiA 30365
This letter concerns t"c1e prop::,sed/=npleted FIT rep::,rt on the
follONing CERCLA site:
Site Ncme:
site r.D.#: -----------------
Site Refere..~ce#:
'
EP.~ Project Manager: -1-//~-'-~==~------
The above site has been assessed bv E~~ and a disp:::,sition made on i~.
Therefore, it has now been assigned to FIT for t.'1e follONing action:
-------NFRAP
-------
Sincerely,
Susan M. Ceilil, Chief
North Ur>it
PA
SSI Phase I (PAR)
551 Phase II
LSI Evaluation
LSI
f\-TT"1C-fn:::----0 ( ,;; T/-h;f f2_EV I 5 13:0
TO Be-CJM-,. f' ~ 8 b -:rJks
:P12v lo~ .
Site Assessment Secticn
• UNITED S,T ATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
4WD-WPB
OCT 2 2 1990
Ms. Pat DeRosa, Head 1
REGION IV
345 COURTLAND STREET. N.E.
ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30365
North Carolina Department of Environment
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 '
Raleigh, North Caro],ina 27611
Dear Ms. DeRosa:
Enclosed for your files are five Screening Site Inspection (SSI),
Phase I reports prepared by the Region IV Field Investigation Team,
NUS Corporation. The site names and their determinations are as
follows:
Lilly Company, Incorporation
'Q:_ohnson_Controls.,_Inc")
Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Texaco, Incorporation1
Paul Love's Pit
NCD003232030
t.NCD_O_D,0}_7_0_48:f}
NCD000772376
NCD000623199
NCD980503080
NFRAP
CssI_i'in:,..,a~_!,;,=e;,""". IJ;]"
NFRAP
SSI Phase II
NFRAP
As discussed earlier, I have also enclosed the draft HRS score sheets
for the following sites that were inadvertently omitted from the
state file copies of the SSI reports.
'
Radiators Specialty
Western Electric Co.,1 Inc.
Fiber IndustrieSj Inc,
Sultzer-Ruti, Inc.
West Point Pepperell 1 Royal Development-Co., Inc.
ENCEE Chemicals Sales, Inc.
NCD091245969
NCD003213907
NCD041043811
NCD980558803
NCD045924032
NCD003521960
NCD003201837
EPI site
EPI site
EPI site
_ If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at (404)
347-5065.
Sincerely,
~1~1 avad-J¥
Deborah A. Vaughn-Wright
Project Manager
Enclosures
Printed on Recycled Paper
• •
SSI PHASE I
RECONNAISSANCE DOCUMENTATION CHECKLIST
I
This information is-required for all 551 Phase Is. Much of it will be detailed in your letter report,
logbook, or topo map. In such cases, provide only brief descriptions and reference citations on the
checklist to avoid duplication. Cite the source for i!!! information obtained for i!!! sections. Lists of
H RS-speci fie definitions and sensitive environment identifications are attached.
I
Site Name: Johnson Controls, Inc., Globe Battery
City, County, State: Winston-Sal~m, Forsyth County, North Carolina
EPA ID No.: NCD000770487
Person responsible for form: Terry Tanner
Date: 7/10/90
DESKTOP DA TA COLLECTION
(Can be done before or after recon. Include attachments as necessary).
I. Groundwater Use (See pro'ject geologist for this information)
• ldenti fy aqui fer(s) of concern.
'
The unconfined soil and rock aquifer system (see letter report).
• Identify any areas of, karst terrain within the 4-mile site radius, and confining layers and
hydraulic interconnections within 2 miles of the site. '
None observed.
II. Surface Water Use
• Identify uses along the 15-stream-mile surface water pathway (i.e. drinking water,
fishing, irrigation, industrial).
Drinking intake for 76,500 connections located 1.5 stream miles from facility. Fishing
does occur along this 'pathway (see letter report).
• Identify any designated recreational areas, sensitive environments, and fisheries along
the surface water p~thway. Specify whether fishing is recreational, subsistence, or
commercial. Information for smaller water bodies can be confirmed or obtained from
local sources during t~e recon.
Recreational fishing does occur along the surface water pathway (see letter report).
-1-
Ill. Sensitive Enviro.nts 1 • • Identify any sensiti,ve environments within 4 radial miles of the site (See Table 4-23 of the
February 15, 1990,,HRS Draft Final Rule, attached). Remember, sensitive environments
are not limited to c,ritical habitats,
None observed.
DRIVE-BY RECONNAISSANCE DATA COLLECTION
(This information should be recorded in logbooks with attachments).
' I. Groundwater Use (This information can generally be obtained from local water departments,
or city hall in rural areas).
• Identify on copies of topos the extent of all municipal systems and areas served by
private wells within: 4 miles of the site.
See topo map provided with letter report.
• Locate on copies of topos all municipal well locations in the site area, including any wells
of a blended system' >4 miles from site. Specify if water from these wells is partially or
fully blended prior io or during distribution, and if any surface water intakes contribute
to a blended system '(whether or not they draw from the target sw pathway).
'
The Walkertown sys\em uses only groundwater for source.
• Note the. depth, pumpage, and population served for all municipal wells within the 4-
mile site radius. Complete well survey forms.
Average depth: 175 feet
' ! Population: 1,270 people
Pumpage: Unknown (see letter report).
• Document other gro~ndwaier uses (e.g. irrigation, industrial).
None observed.
II. Surface Water Use
• Identify on topos the 15-mile surface water pathway.
Surface water runoff, flows ,northwest for 600 feet to Martin Mill Creek. This creek
travels northwest for 2,300 feet before reaching Lowrey Creek. This creek travels 1 mile
southwest before entering Salem Lake.
-2-
• •
• Identify and locate on topos any surface water intakes within 15 miles downstream of
the site (to be obtained from local water department).
Surface water intake on Salem Lake 1.5 stream miles from facility serves 76,S00
connections in Fors'yth County (see letter report).
Ill. Site and Area Use Data Collection (May be obtained before or during recon)
• Describe any barriers to travel (e.g. rivers) within 1 mile of the site (consult topo).
None observed.
I
• Describe population within the immediate site vicinity and within the 4-mile radius (e.g.
sparsely populated rural areas, commercial/industrial areas, densely populated urban
areas, etc.).
Moderately poulation rural area consistingj predominately of residential homes (see
letter report).
• Obtain aerial photo,s of site and immediate vicinity whenever available (from county
offices).
None obtained.
• Note if the facility is· on sewers or septic tanks (consult water or public works
department). '
Unknown.
• Obtain current property owner information from the county tax assessor's office.
Johnson Controls
P.O. Box 1002
Old Greensboro Road'
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
(Block 3262, Lot 201)
-3-
·WfGt:IVED
OCT 2 5 1990
1927 LAKESIDE PARKWAY
SUITE 614
TUCKER. GEORGIA 300B4
404-93B-771 a s i s B I s P.. s SUPERFUND SECTION
September 12, 1990
Mr. A.R. Hanke
Waste Programs Branch
Waste Management Division
Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street, N.E. ·
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
· "· .r2on nr.t ri~-1 SEi) l ti: 1990 I
-..,. " lSU 0
EPJ{ . !'!J:GION IV
ATLANTA, GA.
Sub1ect: Screening Site Inspection, Ph.ca.:..se'--I __
'i)ohrisonControls,~G I ob.e.Battery3
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
EPA I.D. No. NCD000770487
TDD No. F4-9001-170
Dear Mr. Hanke:
C-586-9-0-61
/J.\lo.ut"-w~,fl
10-1-'lo
.s.SJ f'Aµv. i
FIT 4 conducted a Phase I Screening Site Inspection at Johnson Controls, Inc., Globe Battery Division,
in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County', North Carolina. This assessment included a review of EPA and state
file material, completion of a target survey, and an offsite reconnaissance of the facility and
surrounding area.
Johnson Controls, Inc. is located on Old Greensboro Road in a rural area of Winston-Salem, Forsyth
County, North Carolina. The parent company, Johnson Controls located in Milwaukee, Wisconsin,
began operations at this location: in '1978 (Ref. 1). Operations and/or uses of this property prior to
1978 remain unknown. On site st'ructures include a production building with an adjacent office, an
above ground tank farm, and a drum storage area. A monitoring well was observed at the northern
section of the property (Ref. 2). :
Past plant operations consisted of'.the manufacture of batteries primarily for automobiles. Batteries
were assembled and charged by el,ectrical rectifiers (Ref. 3). Plant pro.duction was estimated at 6,000
to 11,000 batteries per day during 1984. Raw materials used include pig lead, lead oxide, barium
sulphate, carbon black, and sulphuric acid (Ref. 4). Waste produced consisted of lead contaminated
sludge from a wastewater treatment process and wet scrubbers, lead dust from a dry-air cleaning
device, barium (in the form of barium sulphate), and paper trash contaminated with lead dust
(Refs. 3, 5).
0 A Hallibunon Company
\ • •
Mr. A.R. Hanke
Environmental Protection Agency
TDDNo.F4-9001-170 '
September 12, 1990-page 2
In the past, lead· dust may have been released to the atmosphere during filter bag changes. This
process has since been modified to eliminate any further releases (Ref. 6) In 1980, total lead waste
was estimated at 122,000 gallons per year while barium waste.was estimated at 400 gallons per year
(Ref. 3). Waste disposal, during 1981, was contracted with Saunders Lead Company in Troy, Alabama.
Disposal methods prior to 1980 are not known (Ref. 7) A spill involving 3,000 gallons of sulphuric
acid occurred during a tank loading in 1979. The acid was neutralized, drummed, and sent to a
landfill for disposal (Ref. 8). A~other acid spill was recorded in 1982; however, details of this incident
are not available (Ref. 9). Ori,e of these spills was responsible for contaminating a nearby pond
(Ref 2)
Johnson Controls originally filed a RCRA Part A hazardous waste permit application in 1980 as a
storage facility (Ref 3) The following year this Part A was withdrawn and their status changed from
a storer to a generator only (Re'f. 10). Later that same year their file was reactivated. The Part A was
ammended to list the facility as a storer of waste (Ref. 11). An Interim Status Inspection conducted
during December 1984, indicated defi~iencies to include surface water runoff concerns (Ref 7). The
facility submitted a RCRA Part 13 Hazardous Waste Permit application in 1984, with the draft version
approved in 1986 (Refs. 4, 12).' Later that same year, Johnson Controls, Inc., having established an
alternate means of disposal, decided not to pursue their Part B permit application (Ref. 13). On June
11, 1986, notification for formal denial of a final permit and termination of interim status was issued
for Johnson Controls, Inc. (Ref. '14). Their current listing as of March 1990, is a generator (Ref. 15).
This facility has had both an Air Emissions Permit and a Surface Water Discharge Permit (Ref. 3).
' Johnson Controls, Inc. is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province and hydrogeologic regime
of north-central North Carolina: (Refs. 16, 17). This regime is characterized by thick regolith over
fractured igneous and metamocphic rock (Ref. 17, p. 251, 252). The climate is mild and temperate
with an annual precipitation of 7 inches (Ref. 18, pp. 43, 63). One-year 24-hour rainfall is
approximately 2.7 inches (Ref. 19_, p. 93)
In the eastern section of Forsyth,County, the bedrock consists of mica gneisses and schist with lesser
amounts of hornblend gneisses. It also consists of granites, pegmatite dikes, and ultramafic rocks (Ref.
20, Figure 2). The overlying residual soil can average 10 to 20 meters in thickness. It may exceed 100
meters on ridges such as where the facility is found (Ref. 17, p. 252). The residual soils and crystalline
. . I rocks are hydraulically interconnected.
'
The aquifer normally used in this area is the unconfined, residual soil/crystalline rock aquifer system.
This system consists of crystalline 'igneous rock and is normally found between 75 and 200 feet below
land surface (bls)(Ref. 21, pp. 330,331). Groundwater is found in the intercon.nected pore spaces of
the weathered rock, residual soil,;and in the Joints and fractures of the bedrock (Ref 17, p. 252). Local
water levels in the aquifer are va(ied (Ref 17). The water level associated with hills and ridges in the
Piedmont Province averages 36.8 foet bis (Ref 22, p. 30). The unsaturated zone of residual soil is the
layer of lowest hydraulic conductivity Soils of this type have been shown to have hydraulic
conductivities that range from 1 .x 10-s to 1 x 10-3 cm/sec (Ref. 17). Recharge to the aquifers is by
infiltration of rainwater (Ref. 17, p. 253).
NUS CORPORATION
•
Mr. A.R. Hanke
Environmental Protection Ag~ncy
TDD No. F4-9001-170
September 12, 1990 -page 3
•
The city of Walkertown operates 'ihe only municipal system within a 4-mile radius dependent upon
groundwater. This municipal system combines water from four wells each drilled to a depth of 175
feet and located between 3 and 4 miles north of Johnson Controls. This system serves an estimated
1,270 people. The Walkertown system relies on the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Water System for
backup support (Ref. 23). An estimated 207 residents located within 3 miles of the facility are
dependent upon private wells'for drinking purposes. An additional 78 residents between the 3-and
4-mile radius also obtain groundwater from private wells. This estimate is based upon homes located
outside municipal water distribution lines (Ref. 24). The nearest private well is located 1,500 feet east
of the facility (Ref. 2)
Surface water runoff flows northeast for 600 feet before reaching an unnamed tributary. This
tributary flows northwest for 2,300 feet before reaching Lowrey Creek. This creek travels I mile
southwest before entering Salem Lake (Ref. 23). A surface water intake on this lake, located 1 75
stream miles from Johnson Controls, is used to supply drinking water to the Winston-Salem/Forsyth
County municipal system, in ad\Jition to the city of Kernersville. Water from this system is combined
with water from the Yadkin Riv~r for d.istribution to an estimated 76,500 connections (Refs. 24, 25, 26,
27, 28, 29). Salem Lake is used for recreational fishing only (Ref. 2).
Land use within a 4 mile radius consists of commercial/industrial properties in addition to both single
and multi-family residential properties (Ref. 24). Workers were observed on site during the
reconnaissance. Public accessibility to the facility is restricted by a fence which surrounds the property
(Ref. 2). An estimated 6,534 pe~ple reside within a 4-mil12 radius of Johnson Controls. Approximately
1,056 of these people are located within I mile of the facility (Ref. 23). The nearest residence is
located 1,200 feet to the south on Walk~rton-Guthrie Road (Refs. 2, 25).
Threatened plants in Forsyth County include the bog rose (Arethusa bulbosa), the nestronia
(Nestronia umbellula). and the y,ellow fringeless orchid (Platanthera integra). Endangered plants for
the area include Small's portulaca (Portulaca smallii) (Ref. 30).
Based on the results of this evaluation, FIT 4 recommends that Phase II of this Screening Site
Inspection be conducted at John~on Controls, Inc., Globe Battery, on a medium-priority basis. If you
have any comments or questions 1bout this Phase I 551, please contact me at NUS Corporation.
Terry L. Tanner
Project Manager
TL Tijec
Enclosures (2)
cc: Debbie Vaughn-Wright
Approved
NUS CORPORATION
• •
REFERENCES
1. Frank E. Moore, Environmental Health Section, North Carolina Division of Health Services,
letter to Mark Pegram, Johnson Controls, March 22, 1984. Subject: Pre-RCRA hazardous waste
disposal ac!ivities.
2. NUS Corporation Field Logbook No. F4-2120 for Johnson Controls, Inc., Globe Battery, TDD No.
F4-9001-170. Document~tion off acility reconnaissance, March 28, 1990.
3. EPA Hazardous Waste Permit Application (EPA Form 3510-1) for Johnson Controls Inc., Globe
Battery Division, in Winston Salem, North Carolina. Filed by Milton C. Zilis, Vice President.
4. RCRA Part B Permit Application for Hazardous Waste Storage Area, Document D-144, Johnson
Controls Inc., Globe Battery Division, (June, 1984). '
5. Mark Pegram, Engineering Manager for Johnson Controls, Globe Battery Division, letter to
Frank Moore, North Carolina Department of Human Resources, May 9, 1984. SubIect: Pre-
RCRA hazardous waste disposal activities.
6. Frank E. Moore, Environ1mental Health Section, North Carolina Division of Health. Services,
letter to Walton Jones, ·Air and Hazardous Materials Division, Environmental Protection
Agency, June 1, 1984. Subject: Preliminary Assessment Report.
7. RCRA Inspection Report ·for Johnson Controls, Globe Battery Division, Winston Salem, North
Carolina. Filed by Jim B\yan, Forsyth County Health Department; obtained from EPA file
material.
8. Robert F. Nicolai, Manager for Environmental Control, Johnson Comtrols, letter
Moore, North Carolina Department of Human Resources, December 8, 1983.
Notification of hazardous1waste spill.
to Frank
Subject:
9. Potential Hazardous wadte Site Preliminary Assessment (EPA Form 2070-12) for Johnson
Controls, Inc., Globe Battery. Filed by O.W. Strictland, North Carolina Department of Human
Resources, May 22, 1984. '
10. Michael Taimi, Consolidated Permits Branch Enforcement Division, Environmental Protection
Agency, letter to Robert F. Nicolai, Johnson Controls, October 8, 1981. Suoj'ect: Part A
application.
11. Daniel P. Thoman, Environmental Protection Agency, letter to Robert Nicolai, Johnson
Controls, Inc., Globe Battery, November 9, 1981. Subject: RCRA status.
12. Charles E. Rudgren, Environmental Health Section, North Carolina Department of Human
Resources, memorandum to Bob Midgette, Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch,
March 26, 1986. Subject: R:eview of draft RCRA permit for Johnson Controls, Inc.
I
13. William L. Meyer, North C::arolina Department of Human Resources, letter to Mark Pegram,
Johnson Controls, Inc., Ma~ 27, 1986. Subject: Part A application status.
14. William L. Meyer, North Carolina Department of Human Resources, letter to
Johnson Controls, Inc., Jul/29, 1986. Subject: RCRA permit denial.
Mark Pegram,
NUS CORPORATION
15.
• •
Hazardous Waste Data Management Systems (HWDMS) for Johnson Controls Inc., Globe
Battery Division, March,18, 1990, p. 135.
16. Arthur L. Bloom, Geomorphology: A Systematic Analysis of Late Cenozoic Landforms
(Englewood Cliffs, New:Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.,).
17. Linda Aller, et al., DRASTIC: A Standardized System for EvaluatingGround Water Pollution
Potential Using Hydrogeologic Settings, EPA-600/2-87-035(ADA, Oklahoma: EPA, April 1987).
18. U.S. Department of Commerce, Climatic Atlas of the United States (Washington, D.C.: GPO,
June 1968). Reprint: 1983, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
19. US. Department of Commerce, Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States, Technical Paper
No. 40 (Washington, DC : GPO 1961)
20 Jasper L. Stuckey and Stephen G. Conrad, Explanatory Text for Geologic Map of North Carolina,
North Carolina Department of Conservation and Development Bulletin No. 71 (Raleigh, North
Carolina, 1958).
21. R. Allan Freeze and John A. Cherry, Groundwater (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall,
Inc., 1979), p. 29.
22. Charles C. Daniel Ill, Statistical Analysis Relating Well Yield to Construction Practices and Siting
of Wells in the Piedmon't and BlueRidge Provinces of North Carolina, U.S. Geological Survey,
Water Resources Investigations Report 86-4132 (Releigh, North Carolina, 1987). :
23. Robert Sheperd, Walkertown Water Department, telephone conversation with Chris Brown,
NUS Corporation, June 13, 1988. Subject: Water distribution for Walkertown.
24. Alphabetical Within County Listing of Active Community PWS, OHR, Environmental Health
Section, Water Supply Branch, July 10, 1990, p. 46.
I
'
25. U.S. Geological Survey, 7.5 minute series Topographic Quadrangle Maps of North Carolina:
Winston Salem East 1950 _(Photorevised 1987). Kernsville 1969 (PR 1987). Belews Creek 1969 (PR
1986), Walkertown 1951 (PR 1986), scale 1 :24,000.
I . 26. NUS Corporation Field Logbook No. F4-1097 for Amp Inc, TDD No. F4-8809-19. Documentation
of f aci Ii ty reconnaissance,' October 18, 1988.
27. Roger Nelson, City of Kernersville Water Department, telephone conversation with Chris
Brown, NUS Corporation, June 13, 1988. Subject: Water distribution for Kernersville.
'
28. Donald Homes, Winston-Salem Water Department, telephone conversation with Samuel
Mciver, NUS Corporation, April 23, 1990. Subject: Water connections for Winston-Salem.
I
29. Public Water Supply Data_ Sheet for Surface Water Source, North Carolina Division of Health
Services, Enviromental Health Section, Water Supply Branch, June 10, 1990.
30. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Element List for Forsyth County, June 30, 1990, p. 1.
NUS CORPORATIOI'-
• •
sITE NAME: Jb/l_lVStJA/ ~IV r£t1t..s rlV't!. (GLtJ6E ./l47TE,ey 1>1v.)
ID II: /v'C/J t)t){J 77tJ,fY7
THIS SITE IS A TSD. DO NOT SCHEDULE SITE INVESTIGATION.
I
•• i ••
·--·~ State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, I-Iealth, and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box •27687.· Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Mr. Fred Overstreet
Environmental Health Director I Forsyth County Health Department
720 Carl Russell Avenue
Winston-Salem, NC 27102:
n March 1990
RE: Off-site Reconnaisiances
Johnson Controls Giobe Battery
Westinghouse Electric
Sadolin Paint ProaJcts, Inc.
Reynolds, R.J. Tobacco Co.·
RJR Archer, Inc.
RJR Archer, Inc.
Dear Mr. Overstreet:
NCO 000 770 487
NCO 000 772 376
NCD 991 278 680
NCO 000 616 474
NCO 044 514 602
NCO 067 441 394
William L. Meyer
Dircclor
David Lilley of the1NC Superfund Section spoke with you today to notify you
that the EPA Field Investigation Team (FIT) will conduct off-s.i.te reconnaissances
of the subject sites located in Forsyth County, NC. The reconnaissances will be
conducted on 27-29 Marchll990 by Terry Tanner, Stephany Fine, Sam Mciver, and
Margaret Graves of NUS Corporation.
' The purpose of the, reconnaissances is to determine if the sites pose a
hazard to public health 6r the environment because of releases of contaminants
to soil, surface water, grOundwater, or air. The reconnaissance team will locate
all nearby water supplies: (surface and groundwater, community and private) and
any close sensitive environments, schools, and day care centers.
I ' These reconnaissances are not emergency situations but are normal steps in
the evaluation of all uncontrolled and unregulated potential hazardous waste
sites in North Carolina. I You· may want to have your representative meet the
reconnaissance team at the sites. If so, please contact Terry Tanner at 1-800-
888-7710 and he will coordinate a meeting. I am enclosing background data on the
' sites for your information.
Mr. Overstreet
3-13-90
Page 2
••
1
If the reconnaissa~ces indicate the need for future study of the sites, we
will contact your offic~ to advise. If you have any questions, please don't
hesitate to call David Lilley or me at [phone].
Enclosures
cc: Gordon Layton
Doug Holyfield
Steve Reid
Lois Walker
Ann Rudd
David Lilley
File
GN/db/wp-sitenote.gn
~/Jnl1~
Sincerely, t
joeeo ,,ooo>soo, ,;.,
V CERCLA Branch
Superfund Section
Federal •• Trip' Notification & Authorization
Prepared by lJo,u; rl l)/'1/ I
• U$c Blad; Ink or Typewriter only-Staff 10 fill out first 2 ~locks only.
' Site ]1-ip '
I
/Y] etr 0 ic I
Date of Trip: )..7-J"! /? 'lo
/
If trip date changed or cancelled note below: I
Trip Date Changed To: Cancelled: --
NCD#: ooo 7)0 'j_"i[_7 Site Name: )oh"_:;""' C17•,.<fro/,.-C-/d; e Baff-toy
City: /j);"-zf/7,, --S-,,lem G:ounty: For::rtt: '
Reason f'or Trip: ;,fl' . C ,-2_,•k re__cvn11c,(s·~c,;' at-r
'
:
Name of' Hotel (Overnight Trip):
' '
Project Team Leader:
•✓.----l err'< "Te,_n n er
'
' Assistants:
' Attach To Notification Form: I copy each:
Submit to the
Industrial Hygienist
'
Hotel Telephone Number: ( ) --
!} c/
Authorized hy: _JJo,;~/r::. d
,. lndustria!~eJU, t
'
Preliminary Assessment Form (First page only)
Site Map
PA Transmittal Letter
(l'lcasc list ,1pprorriatc County l·lcalth Ucpartrncnt co,ntact pcr.;on Lo call Lo ,1Uvisc of trip) &hv .. i/ecL /J0
Title: Or,-ecfo,
}_1(,()
Teleplionc Number: (11'1 )7:;_-7 --::r:Y-9--'1-
Environmental Supervisor or Heal ti! Director to call: ///Ll:i,:_~ccsfree'f
(Note if Ur., i\Ll'., etc.)
Notes: Health Dcphrtment Official Contacted: Fr:i_O--'-v"",:;L,·>""~1-'-,-.,,_,·'"-"'-/_--_· _
l3ack Up Letter Required: Y cs / No
;r),,. Overstc!~I-i,udS .nol.,(eJ,_..,.., J -13 -7c:, @Be)
Note: Sig11cd original t(i Data J\·1.irwgci
CB=fNus.,•
L__D CORPORATION
1927 LAKESIDE PARKWAY
SUITE 614
TUCKEA, GEORGIA 300B4
A04-93B-771 0
March 1, 1990
Mr. Grover Nicholson
Superfund Branch
North Curolina Department of Human Resources
Post Office Box 2091 '
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-2091
Subject: Scheduled FIT Activities in North Cur·olina
Dear Mr. Nicholson:
C-586-3-0-17
The EPA Field Investigation Team:(FIT)will be visiting the state of !forth Carolina during March 1990.
FIT will be conducting offsite reconnaissances and gathering information to investigate the following
sites:
Date EPA ID No. Site Name County
March 20 NCD986171965 Caro-Knit New Hanover
NCD986171973 McRae Street Landfill New Hanover
March 27-29 NCD000770487 Johnson Controls Globe Forsyth
Battery
NCD000772376 Westinghouse Electric Forsyth
NCD044514602 RJR Archer, Inc. Forsyth
NCD067441394 RJR Archer, Inc. Forsyth
NCD991278680 Sadolin Paint Products, Inc. Forsyth
NCD000616474 Reynolds. R.J. Tobasco Co. Forsyth
NCD003214574 Spruance Southern, Inc. Davidson
Please notify the app,opriate local agencies. Thank you for your assistance.
Very truly yours,
~.tn-., ~ .. rkJ,/4(:f[)'/V-(-
Joan J. Dupont
North Carolina Section Manager
JJD/gwn
cc: Denise Bland
Kelly Cain
Robert Morris
Approved:
FIT Project
Manater
Priscilla Fritsch
Priscilla Fritsch
Terry Tanner
Terry Tanner
Stephany Fine
Stephany Fine
Sam Mciver
Margaret Graves
Margaret Graves