NCD000770487_19980901_Johnson Controls Battery Group_SERB PA SI_Expanded Site Inspection Volume II - References-OCR

I I I , I I . I
I
I
I
eJ
I
I
n
D
m
I
I
ti
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Forsyth County
Environmental Affairs Department
January 8, 1998
Doug Moore
NC Superfund Section
Division of Waste Management
401 Oberlin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27605
Dear Mr. Moore:
RECEIVED
JAN 12 1998
. SUPERFI IND !';Fl;T•~~I . . . Pursuant to our telephone conversation two days ago, I have enclosed a copy orth'e alrquahty operating permit (pernut
#00725R8) and 1996 Emissions Inventory for the Johnson Controls lead-acid battery manufacturing plant in Kernersville,
North Carolina. For your information, I have also enclosed a copy of New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Subpart
KK "Standards of Performance for Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Plants".
I have noticed some errors on the two "Stack/Vent Information" pages of the 1996 Emissions Inventory. In particular, the stack
heights as listed represent the height of the stack from the roof, instead of the height/ram the ground which should be listed.
Also, some of the stacks have raincaps, or are either horizontal or down turned. For these stacks the velocities have not been
listed as 0.03 feet/second as they should have been. I will ask Johnson Controls to send me a corrected version of the two
"Stack/Vent Information" pages. When] receive the revised pages, I will semi copies to you. I have not yet completed my
review of the inventory, so there may be other errors that I have not yet detected. If any other information needs to be revised,
I will send the revisions to you.
I spoke with the Lew Weinstock, the manager of my department's Analysis & Monitoring Division, about ambient lead
monitoring that was performed around 1990 on property adjacent to the Johnson Controls facility. He has been working here
since about 1985 and did remember that my department had conducted some lead monitoring on a woman's property adjacent
to Johnson Controls around 1990. He said that he would try to find where the monitoring results were stored. When he locates
this information, I will send copies to you.
In addition, l spoke on the phone today with Rick Newberry, Plant Manager at Johnson Controls. He told me that Chris Fisher
and James DiBiagio no longer work there. Newberry told me that the new environmental contact person is Cecil Boyd, Plant
Engineer. I thought you would be interested to know about these staffing changes. I don't know if Cecil Boyd is aware of
the superfund investigation that you are conducting. I plan to call him to make sure that he is aware of the Forsyth County
air quality permitting obligations that Johnson Controls must fulfill.
I hope this information is of use to you. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need any additional
information. I can be contacted by telephone at [phone], by FAX at [phone], or by email at
[e-mail]. The 336 area code replaced the old 910 area code in mid-December 1997, but 910 is still useable
until mid-June 1998. --
Please keep me informed as to the status of your investigation. We would very much like to receive a copy of any report on
environmental concerns related to t,he Johnson Controls facility. Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
~·~.a__
Robert 0. Russ
Environmental Specialist
Enclosures
~---537 North Spruce Street -Winston-Salem. NC 27101-1362 -Phone [phone] -Fax [phone]-----'
@ Recycled Paper
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -,
I
STATIONARY SOURCES
where visible emissions are observed, and
the corresponding feed rate of the kiln
shall also be recorded. Records shall be
maintained of any 6-minutc average that
is in excess of the emissions specified in
§60.342(a) of this subpart.
(c) The owner or operator of any rotary
lime kiln using a wet scrubbing emission
control device subject to the provisions of
this subpart shall not be·rcquircd to moni-
tor the opacity of the gases discharged as
required in paragraph (a) of this section,
but shall install, calibrate; maintain, oper-
ate, and record the resultant inforination
from the following continuous monitoring
devices:
(1) A mOnitoring device for thC' contin-
uous measurement of the pressure loss of
the gas stream·through the scrubber. The
monitoring device must be accurate with·
in ± 250 pascals (one inch of water).
(2) A monitoring device for continuous
measurement of the scrubbing liquid sup--
ply pressure to the control device. The
monitoring device must be accurate'with•
in ± 5 pi:icent of the design scrubbing
liquid supply pressure. · .
(d) For the purpose.of; conducting a
performance test under· '§60.8, the owner
or operator of any liffie ·manufacillring
plant subject to the· provisions of this sulr
part shall install, calibrate, maintain, and
operate a device for ·measuriflg t.he rriass
rate .of.stone.feed to any ~~ected ,rot.ary
lime kiln. The measuring device used
must be accurate to within ± 5 percent of
the mass rate over its .operating range.
( e) !'or .the purpose of reports required
under. §60.7(c), periods ,of excess. emis-
s_ions that shall be reJX)rted are defined· as
all.6-minute periods-during.which .the av-
erage Op~city of the-visible emissions from
any lime kiln subject to paragraph (a) of
this subpart is greater than 15 percent or,
in the case of wet scrubbers, any period in
which the scrubber pressure drop is
greater than 30 percent below the rate
established during the perforritance test.
If visible emission observations are made
according to paragraph (b) of this section,
rej>orts of excess emis.Sions shall be sub-
mitted semiannually.
§60.344 Tesi ·methods and procedures.
(a) In conducting the performance tests
required in §60.8, the owner· or opera to
shall use as reference methods and proce
du res. the_ test methods in appendix A o
this part or other methods and procedure
7-5-96
as specified in this section, except as pr<r
vided in §60.8(b).
(b) The owner or operator shall deter•
mine compliance with the particulate
matter standards in §60,342(a) as follows:
(I) The emission rate (E) of part_iculate
matter shall be computed for each run
using the following equation:
E=(c, Q.,)/PK)
where:
E=emission rate of particulate matter,
kg/Mg (I b/ton) of stone feed.
Cs=concentration of particulate matter,
g/dscm (g/dscf).
Qsd=volumetric flow rate of effluent
gas, dscm/hr (dscf/hr). ·
P=stone feed rate, Mg/hr (ton/hr).
K=conveision factor, 1000 g/kg (453.6
g/lb). · ·
. (2) Method 5 shall be used at negative-
pressure fab_ric filters and· other tyJ)Cs Of
control devices and Method 5D shall be
usCd as positive•preSsure :fabric filters tO
determine the particulate ·matter concen•
tration (Cs) and the volumetric flow ·t"ate
(Q,.) of the efiluent gas.-The sampling
time·· and saniple volume for each 'ruil
shall be at least 60 minutes and 0.90 dscm
(31.8 dscf). .
. (3) The monitoring device of
§60.343(d) shall-be used to determine the
stone feed rate (P) for each run.
·(4)·Method 9 and the procedures in
.. §60.11 shall be used to determine opacity.
. (c) During the particulate·matter·run,
the owner.or operator shall t.ise,the moni-
toring devices in §60.343(c)(l}°and (2) to
determine the average pressure loss of the
gas stream through. the scrubber and th
average scrub · · · ly pressure
Subpa~t ICTC-Standards of Perforc .
mance for Lead-Acid Battery Manu-
. factoring Plants
§60.370 Applicability and designation of .
affected facility. ·
·(a) The proviSions of this sllbp·art are
applicable to the affected· facilities listed
in paragraph (b) of this section at any
lead-acid battery manufacturing plant
that produces or has the design capacity
to produce in one day (24 hours) batteries
containing an amount of lead equal to or
greater than 5.9 Mg (6.5 tons) ..
(b) The· provisions of this subpart are
applicable to the following affected facili-
S-1029
120:0623
ties used in the manufacture of lead.acid
storage batteries:
(I) Grid casting facility .
(2) Paste mixing facility.
(3) Three-pro<;css operation facility.
(4) Lead oxide manufacturing facility,
(5) Lead reclamation facility.
(6) Other lead•cmitting operations.
(c) Any facility under paragraph (b) of
this section the construction or modifica•
tio_n of which is commenced after January
14, 1980, is subject to the requirements of
this su~part.
§60.371 Definitions.
As Used in this subpart, all terms not
defined herein shall have the ffieaning giv•
en. the~ _in the Act and in subpart A of
thiS pa"rt.
(a) Grid casting facility ·means the fa.
_cility which includes al_l lead melting pots
and machines used for casting the grid
used in battery maflufacturing.
(b) Lead-acid battery manufacturing
·plqn.t means any plant that· produces _a
storage· battery using lead· a[ld lead com-
po~nd_s. for ·t~e _plates and sulfuric acid for
the ~ICCtrOlyte, . .
(c) Lead oxide rnanufaciuring facility
means a facility that produces lead oxide
from lead, includir:ig ·product recovery.
(~) Lead reclamation facility means
~he facility that remelts lead scrap and
.casts it into lead ingots for .use in the bat-
tCry manufacturing. pro.cess, and which is
not a furnace affected.under.subpart L of
this _part. · · ·
''(~); Oi_h_er., /ead-efftitting operation
me3ns any lead-acid battery manufactur•
ing plant operation from which lead ,emis-
sions are collected and ducted to the at-
: m~Phere and .which is' ·not part of a grid
c3stirig,. ICad O,;ide manufacturing, lead
reclamation, paste mixing, Or . thrCe•pro--
cCSs operatiori' facility, or a furnace affect-
ed under subpar! L of_ this part. · ·
(f) P0ste mixin"g facility .Illeans thC fa.
cility including lead oxide storage, con•
veying, weighing, metering, and charging
operations; paste blending, handling, and
cooling operations; and plate pasting,
takeoff, cooling, and drying operations.
(g) Three-process operation facility
means the facility including those process•
es involved with plate stacking, burning or
strap casting, and· assembly of elements
into the battery case.
[Sec. 60.371 (g)]
pyright © 1996 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc,
0013-9211/96/$0+$1.00
120:0624
§60.372 Standards for-lend,
(a) On and after the dale on which the
performance test rC<Juired to be conduct-
ed by §60.8 is completed, no owner oi
--, operator subject to the provisions of this
)subpart shall cause to be discharged into
,-the atmosphere: . . ·
(l) From any grid casting facility any
gases that contain lead in excess of 0.40
milligram of lead per dry standard cubic:
meter of exhaust (0.000176 gr/dscf). ·
(2) From any paste mixing facility any·
gases that contain in• excess of.LOO milli-
gram of lead per dry standard cubic meter
of exhaust (0.00044 gr/dscf).
Sa=is the actual stand3rd for each ex-
haust stream ducted to the control
device.
N=is the total number of exhaust
streams ducted to the control device.
Qsda=is the dry· standard volumetric
flow rate of the effluent gas stream
from each facility ducted to the con-
trol device.
QsdT=is the total dry standard volumc.t-
ric flow rate of all effluent gas
streams ducted to the control device,
§60.373 Monitoring of emissions and
operations.
(3) From any three~process operation The owner or operator of any lead-acid
facility any. gases that contain.in excess of battery manufacturing facility subject to
1.00 lllilligram of lead, per dry standard1 the provision,s. of this subpart and con~
cubic meter of exhaust.(0.00044 gr/dscf). trolled by a scrubbing system(s) shall in-
(_4) From any lead_ oxide manufacturing, stall. calibrate, maintain, and operate a
facthty any gases that contain in Cxcess of1 monitoring device(s) that measures and
5.0_ milligrams of ·1ead Per kilograni of\ records the ·pressure drop acl'oss the
FEDERAL REGULATIONS
Ca=conccntration of lead emissions
from facility "a",· mg/dscm
(gr/dscf).
Qsda=volumetric flow rate of· efiluent
gas from facility "a", dsc_m/hr
(dscf/hr).
N=total number of control devices to
which separate operations in the fa-
cility are ducted.
(3) Method 9 and the procedures in
§60.11 shall be used to determine opacity.
The opacity numbers shall be rounded off
· to the nearest whole percentage. ·
(c) The owner or operator shall deter~
mine compliance with the lead standard
in §60.372(a)(4) as follows:
(I) The emission rate (E) from lead ox-
ide 111.ariufacturing facility shall be com-
puted. for each, run using. the following
equatmn:
lead feed (O.oJO lb/ton). ,scrubbing syst9m(s) at least once every 15
(5) Fr_om any lead recl~mation facilit}' i minutes. The monitoring device_.Shall have where:
any gases ttiilt COntain in. Cxcess of 4.50 an: accuracy of ±5 perce!lt OVCr its oper-E=emiS_siOn r~te ·of_ le_ad. ing/kg
i=I.
milligrams of lead pei dry standard cubic atmg range. . . (lb/ton) of lead charged.' ·
meter of eXha!-'s~ (0.~1~8 ar/~scf) .. · -· -Cpbi=C-Oncentration ·or lead from' emis-
(6) F . §60.374 Test methods and procedures. · · · · · • · · · . ·rorri any other 1ead7Cinitting opcr-s10~· porn_t '1," _ing/dscm. · · ·
ation any gases that contain :iri excess of (a} In conducting the performance tests QMii=volumctric flOw r·ate of effluent
1.00 mil_ligram Per ··dry· standard -Cubic required in §60.8, the owner or operator gaS from emission point "i," dsCin/hr
meter of exhaust (0:00044 gr/dscl). : . shall use as reference methods and proce-(sdcf/hr). · ·· ·
(7) From any affected _faciiity oih~r , d~res the test methods in appendix A of M=number of ·einission points in thC
than a _lead rCclamation facility any gases . this part or other methods and procedures affectCd facility.' -· ·
witJi·g_rCater.than O ~rce:nt Opacity (mea-1 as specified in this section, except as pro-P_~lead fecil rate tO the racility,_kg/hr
sured according to Method 9 and rounded I vided in §60.8(b). (ton/hr). · ·· · ·, • •. •· · · •
.. ,to thC nearest ~hole·,percentage). ··. · ·. ·' j . ·(b)The owner or operator shall deter-K=conversion factor, 'LO m'g/m_g
, '' . (8) From any lead.rec. lamation facility \ ~inc co. mpliance with the lead·standards ·,(453,600 mg/lb). . .. · · .. •: . ·
, · h · · §60 372 t §60 372( )( 4) t ··: (2) Method · 12 shall· be used :10 detcr-·;.-. .../:_ny _gases wu greater ,than 5·.percent 1 ;" •• • 'excep · a 'as ol-minetheleadconcentration(C,,)"andthe
· opac.1ty (measured aero.rd. mg to Mctho .. d 9 \_ows. · · .. · ' · · · volum 1 · fl 1 ·(Q ) f. h ·m d d d h (!) M hod 12 h II be ed enc ow ra e "' o t e e uent an roun c tot e.nearest whole percent-\ · . et s a us to· deter-gas. The •sampling time and 'sample vol-age). · ,pune the le~d concehtration and, if appli-
(b) When two dr more faciHties at the cable, th'e"Volumetric How-rate (Qsda) of-ume for·each run shall be at least 60•min-
same plan((except the' lead oxide manu-the effluent gas. The sampling time"and I utes and 0.85 dscm (30 dscf).. . . : .
factoring facility) are ducted to a com-sample .volume for .each run shall be at \ i3) The.average lead feed rate·(P) shall
~On control device,· ari ·equiv.alCilt starl-least 60 mmu.te~ and 0.85 dscm (30 dscO. be determmed for each run tismg the fol-
dard for th_e total exh"aust froril thcfcom: (2) When different operations in a J lowing equation: · ·
monly controlled .facilities shall be three-process operation facility are ducted
determined as fOllows: · to separate control devices. the lead emis-
. · -sion concentration (C) from the facility
shall be determined as follows: . .
N
S =. " S (Q . · I Q ) e · k-• •Sd sd · a=I a T
Where:
· Sc:=is the equivalent standard for the
total exhaust stream ..
7-5-96
N
C= I
a=I
where:
C=concentration of lead emissions for
the entire facility, mg/dscm
(gr/dscf).
Environment Rejjorter •
0013-9211/96/$0+$1.00
P=N W/0
where:
· N=number of kad pigs. (ingots)
charged. . · . ._ . .
W=average mass of a pig, kg (t0n).
O=duration of run, hr.· -,_ '·
§60.375 [Remo,ed]
(§60.375 added at 58 FR 18015, April 7,
1993: removed at 58 FR 34370; June 25
1993) '
[Sec. 60.375]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
r
ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
537 N. SPRUCE STREET
WINSTON-SALEM, N. C. 27101-1362
PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT/OPERA TE
AIR QUALITY
E XJ,,,. ,,.., Ji ~ e ex ,,.,, e 0 f;JJ-f Al1""1,.,-,/ / ee. &\ At:: &> e f'~ -tt J, d / if, :s cJ~ f., d
PERMIT NUMBER EFFECTIVE DATE EXPIRATION DATE 7/17/C/7
00725R8 August 1, 1996 ( JuIOO.-:f 997 "\
Facility Name:
Mailing Address:
City, State, Zip:
Facility Location:
City:
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.
P.O. Box 591
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201
2701 Johnson Controls Drive
Kernersville, NC
1n accordance v.ith the provisions set forth in Chapter three of the Forsyth County Code, "Air Quality
Control", the facility listed above is hereby authorized to construct and operate air emission sources and/or
air cleaning devices consisting of equipment outlined in Section J of this permit and in accordance v.ith
conditions contained within this pennit.
The construction and operation of equipment in this permit shall be in accordance with all design
specifications, operating parameters, and other information submitted and which is the basis for the issuance
of this pennit. Such information shall be considered part of this permit. The facility must comply v.ith all
applicable rules and regulations whether or not these rules and regulations arc included as part of the permit.
PERMIT CONTENTS:
SECTION I:
SECTION 2:
FACILITY-WIDE EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION
FACILITY GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONS
SECTION 3:
SECTION 4:
EMISSION SOURCE CONDITIONS, LIMITATIONS, REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
CONSTRUCTION/ MODIFICATION
Robert R. Fulp, Director DATE: August I, 1996
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department
I
i?,C>, ,z'
I
a.
I
D
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
Johnson Controls Battery Group, lnc.
Permit To Construct / Operate #00725R8
August 1, 1996
SECTION 1:
FACILITY -WIDE EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION
I.I Permitted Equipment
(a) Three-Process Operation Facility:
Emission Emission Source Description Control Control Device
Source Device Description
ID No. ID No.
COS-I # I COS line: Mark VII COS line, R-4 RADCO#4
JCI-11 stacker & conveyors, Mr. Dust
COS-2 #2 COS line: Mark VII COS line, R-5 RADCO #5
JCI-ll vacuum stacker & conveyors,
Mr. Dust
COS-3 #3 COS line: Mark VII COS line, R-6 RADCO#6
JCI-11½ stacker & conveyors, Mr. Dust
COS-4 #4 COS line: Mark VII COS line, R-7 RADCO#7
JCI-ll½ stacker & conveyors, Mr. Dust
#5 COS line: conveying system, R-10 RADCO#l0
Mark X COS, Mr. Dust
COS-5
#5 COS line: JCl-11 vacuum stacker R-8 RADCO #8
#5 COS line: Mark X Flux Fumes and DCE DCE/DLM 4-3-10
Mr. Dust
#6 COS linc:JCI-11 Model II stacker and R-9 RADCO #9
COS-6 conveyors, Mark X COS line
#6 COS line: Torit cartridge filter DCE DCE/DLM4-3-l 0
COS-7 #7 COS line: MARK VII COS line, R-11 RADCO#l l
JCI-11 stacker, Mr. Dust
2
Emission
Point
Number
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
I ..
D
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
COS-8
(b)
Emission
Source
ID No.
GC-1
GC-2
GC-3
GC-4
GC-5
GC-6
GC-9
SCI 1-M
SC!2-M
(c)
Emission
Source
ID No.
PM-I
PM-2
PM-3
PM-4
PM-5
#8 COS line: Mark VII COS line,
J CI-II½ stacker & conveyors
Grid Casting Facility:
Emission Source Description
# I grid caster
#2 grid caster
#3 grid caster
#4 grid caster
# 5 grid caster
#6 grid caster
#9 grid caster
# 11 negative strip caster:
main flue
# 12 positive strip caster:
main flue
Paste Mixing Facility:
Emission Source Description
# I & #2 Simpson paste mixers
(wet & dry),
# I & #2 OSI flash ovens
#3 & #4 Simpson paste mixers
(wet & dry),
#3 & #4 OSI flash ovens
#5 pasting line: mixer & flash oven
3
R-13 RADCO #13 192
Control Control Device Emission
Device Description Point
ID No. Number
uncontrolled 11
uncontrolled 12
uncontrolled 13
uncontrolled 6
uncontrolled 5
uncontrolled 16
uncontrolled 3
uncontrolled 186
uncontrolled 188
Control Control Device Emission
Device Description Point
ID No. Number
AAFB-3 #3 AAF baghouse 190
AAFB-2 #2 AAF baghouse 81
AAFB-1 # I AAF baghouse 81
I -.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
PL-I # I pasting line
(expanded metal line #3:
divide I flatten / stack)
PL-2 #2 pasting line
(expanded metal line# I)
PL-3 #3 pasting line
(expanded metal line #2)
PL-4 #4 pasting line
PL-5 #5 pasting line: paster & collector
PBO-A PbO storage tank "A"
PBO-B PbO storage tank "B"
PBO-C PbO storage tank "C"
OXT-5 & PbO storage tanks #5 & #6
OXT-6
( d) Lead Oxide Manufacturing Facility:
Emission Emission Source Description
Source
ID No.
SOV-1 Sovema oxide mill # I
SOV-2 Sovema oxide mill #2
4
R-1 #I RADCO 49
R-2 #2 RADCO 49
R-3 #3 RADCO 49
R-14 #14 RADCO 105
R-12 #12 RADCO 185
FK-A Flex-Kleen baghousc 27
"A" (With SMD)
FK-B Flex-Kleen baghousc 28
"B" (With SMD)
FK-C Flex-Kleen baghousc
"C" (With SMD) 122
CF-I Cyclonairc cartridge
filter system 199
(Model # DC-84-25)
CF-2 Cyclonairc safety
monitoring filter
(Model # DC-84-25)
Control Control Device Emission
Device Description Point
ID No. Number
SOVB-1 Sovema baghouse 178
SOVH-1 Sovcma HEP A filter
SOVB-2 Sovema baghouse 175
SOVH-2 Sovema HEPA filter
D
D
D
I
D
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
SOV-3
SOV-4
SOV-5
SOV-6
HRD-S
HRD-N
VENT-I
(e)
Emission
Source
ID No.
PP-1
PP-3
CV-I
CV-2
Sovema oxide mill #3
Sovcma oxide mill #4
Sovema oxide mill #5
Sovema oxide mill #6
South Hardinge oxide mill
and
PbO storage tanks # I and #2
North Hardinge oxide mill
and
PbO storage tanks #3 and #4
Bearing vents for north and south
Hardinge oxide mills
Other Lead-Emitting Operations:
Emission Source Description
post pouring# I (south)
post pouring #3 (north)
housekeeping central vacuum
housekeeping central vacuum
5
SOVB-3 Sovema baghouse 179
SOVH-3 Sovema HEP A filter
SOVB-4 Sovema baghouse 180
SOVH-4 Sovema HEP A filter
SOVB-5 Sovcma baghousc 183
SOVH-5 Sovema HEPA filter
SOVB-6 Sovcma baghouse 184
SOVH-6 Sovema HEP A filter
CD34 baghouse with Gore-34
Tex bags: "M ikro-
Pulsairc" #36S-8-30
CD38 baghouse with Gore-38
Tex bags: "Mikro-
Pulsaire" #36S-8-30
CD87 baghouse with Gore-87
Tex bags: "Mikro-
Pulsaire" #64S-8-20
CD87A HEPA filter
( custom made)
Control Control Device Emission
Device Description Point
ID No. Number
AAFH-1 AAF HEPA filter 62
AAFH-3 AAF HEPA filter 118
CVCF-1 cartridge filter 85
CVCF-2 cartridge filter 98
I -.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
RV-I
RV-2
APB-I
APB-2
APB-3
APB-4
APB-5
APB-6
APB-7
APB-8
CHEMI-M
CHEM2-M
CHEM3-M
CHEM4-M
CHEM5-M
CHEM6-M
CHEM7-M
CHEM8-M
CC-I
CC-2
TOO-I
TD0-2
RADCO vacuum system # I
(pasting RADCO's)
RADCO vacuum system #2
(COS RADCO's)
# I JC! automatic post builder
#2 automatic post builder
#3 automatic post builder
#4 automatic post builder
#5 automatic post builder
#6 automatic post builder
#7 automatic post builder
#8 automatic post builder
# I curing chamber
#2 curing chamber
#3 curing chamber
#4 curing chamber
#5 curing chamber
#6 curing chamber
#7 prototype curing chamber
#8 curing chamber
# I Sovema cylinder caster
#2 Sovema cylinder caster
OSI gas-fired trim dry oven # I
(serving expanded metal line# I)
OSI gas-fired trim dry oven #2
(serving expanded metal line #2)
RVFF-1 Reinke metal fabric 84
filter
RVFF-2 Reinke metal fabric 127
filter
TOR-I Torrit AC-2 filter# I 119
TOR-I Torri! AC-2 filter# I 119
TOR-2 Torri! AC-2 filter #2 119
TOR-2 Torri! AC-2 filter #2 119
TOR-3 Torri! AC-2 filter #3 119
TOR-3 Torrit AC-2 filter #3 119
TOR-4 Torri! AC-2 filter #4 119
TOR-4 Torrit AC-2 filter #4 119
uncontrolled 167
uncontrolled 165
uncontrolled 163
uncontrolled 161
uncontrolled 157
uncontrolled 196
uncontrolled 195
uncontrolled 198
uncontrolled 176
uncontrolled 182
uncontrolled 171
uncontrolled 172
6
I
a.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
TD0-3 OSI gas-fired trim dry oven #3 uncontrolled 193
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
(Serving expanded metal line #3)
SECTION 2:
FACILITY GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE CONDITIONS
Permit fees -If, within thirty (30) days after being billed, the permittee fails to pay an annual
permit fee required under Section 3Q.0200 of the Forsyth County Air Quality Technical Code
(FCAQTC), the Director may initiate action to terminate this permit under Rule 3Q.0309 or Rule
3Q.05 I 9 of the FCAQTC. [Rule 3Q.0206(b)]
Good air pollution control practice -At all times, the equipment listed in Section 1 shall be
operated and maintained in a manner consistent with the design and emissions handling as applied
for in the application. [Rule 3Q.0308(a)(l)]
Odor -No person shall cause or permit the emission of odors beyond the property line of the
facility which are harmful, irritating or which unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment
of any person's properties or living conditions, or any public properties or facilities. No violation
shall be cited provided that the best practical treatment, maintenance, and control of odor
currently available is used. [Rule 3D.0522]
Permit revocation / modification -This permit is subject to revocation or modification by this
Department upon a determination that information contained in the application or presented
thereof is incorrect, conditions under which this permit was granted have changed, or violations
of conditions contained in this permit have occurred. (Rule 3Q.0309(
Inspection entry / access -No person shall refuse entry or access to any authorized
representative of the Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department (FCEAD) who requests
entry or access at reasonable times and using reasonable safety practices for purposes of
inspection, and who presents appropriate credentials, nor shall any person obstruct, hamper, or
interfere with any such representative while in the process of carrying out his official duties.
Refusal of entry or access may constitute grounds for permit revocation and assessment of civil
penalties. [Rule 3Q.0309(a)(5)]
Retention of permit at permitted facility -The permittee shall retain a copy of all active
permits issued under Subchapter 3Q of the FCAQTC at the facility identified in this permit.
[Rule 3Q.0ll0]
New constructions/ modifications -The permittee shall not allow or begin construction or
operation of a new or modified source of regulated air pollutant, other than from those sources
exempted under Rule 3Q.0 I 02, without first applying for and obtaining an air quality permit.
[Rule 3Q.0l01]
7
• ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
18
I
I
2.8 Compliance testing -When requested by the FCEAD for determining compliance with emission
control standards, means shall be provided by the owner to allow periodic sampling and
measuring of emission rates, including necessary ports, scaffolding and power to operate sampling
equipment; and upon the request of this department, data on rates of emissions shall be supplied
by the permittee. [Rule 3D.0501(b)]
General Reporting and Information Submittal Requirements
2.9 Renewal applications -The permittee shall file applications for renewal such that they are
received by this Department at least 90 days before expiration of the permit.
[Rule JQ.0304(1))
2.10 Information requests by Director -The permittee shall furnish to the FCEAD, in a timely
manner, any reasonable information that the Director may request in writing to determine whether
cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating the permit or to determine
compliance with the permit. [Rule 3Q.0308(a)(l ))
2.11 Malfunction / Breakdown report -The owner or operator of a source of excess emissions
which lasts for more than four hours and which results from a malfunction, a breakdown of
process or control equipment or any other abnormal conditions, shall notify the FCEAD of this
occurrence within 24 hours of becoming aware of the occurrence in accordance with Rule
3D.0535 of the FCAQTC. In the case where this event occurs greater than 24 hours before the
FCEAD's next work day, the permittee shall either notify this department between 8:00 am to
I 0:00 am during the next work day or send a facsimile of the event arriving within the above
required time period to FCEAD. [Rule 3D.05351
NSPS General Provisions -Permit Conditions ·
2.12 NSPS -Notification requirements -The permittee shall submit to the Forsyth County I Environmental Affairs Department written notification as follows:
I
I
I
..
I
I
(a)
(b)
(c)
A written notification providing the date construction ( or reconstruction as
defined in 40 CFR 60. I 5) of an affected facility is commenced postmarked no
later than 30 days after such event. An affected facility (defined in 40 CFR 60.2)
"means, with reference to a stationary source, any apparatus to which a standard
is applicable". <40 CFR 60. 7(a)(l)> (Rule 3D.0524(
A notification of the anticipated date of initial startup of an affected facility
postmarked no more than 60 days nor less than 30 days prior to such date.
<40 CFR 60. 7(a)(2)]> (Rule 3D.0524]
A notification of the actual date of initial startup ofan affected facility postmarked
withing 15 days after such event. <40 CFR 60.7(a)(3)> (Rule 3D.0524)
8
I
le
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
(d)
(e)
A notification of any physical or operational change to an existing facility which
may increase the emission rate of any air pollutant to which a standard applies,
unless that change is specifically exempted under the applicable subpart or in 40
CFR 60.14(e). This notice shall be postmarked 60 days or as soon as practicable
before the change is commenced and shall include information describil)g the
precise nature of the change, and the expected completion date of the change.
This department may request additional relevant information subsequent to this
notice. <40 CFR 60.7(a)(4)> [Rule 3D.0524[
A notification of the anticipated date for conducting the opacity observations
required by 40 CFR 60.1 l(e)(l). This notification shall be postmarked no less
than 30 days prior to testing. <40 CFR 60. 7(a)(6)> (Rule 3D.0524)
2.13 NSPS -Files available for inspection -The permittee shall maintain a file of all
measurements, including: performance test measurements; adjustments and maintenance
performed on these systems or devices; monitoring device calibration checks; and all other
information required in 40 CFR 60 . This file shall be kept in a permanent form suitable for
inspection and shall be retained at least two (2) years following the date of such measurements,
maintenance, reports, and records. <40 CFR 60. 7(1)> (Rule 3D.0524)
2.14 NSPS -Maintain records -startup / shutdown / malfunction -The permittee shall
maintain records of the occurance and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the
operation of the affected facility; any malfunction of the air pollution control equipment; or any
periods during which a continuous monitoring system or monitoring device is inoperative.
<40 CFR 60.7(b)> (Rule 3D.0524)
2.15 NSPS -Notice of performance test -The permittee shall provide this department at least 30
days prior notice of any performance test to afford the department the opportunity to have an
observer present. <40 CFR 60.8( d)> (Rule 3D.0524)
2. I 6 NSPS -Performance testing facilities provided by permittee -The permittee shall provide,
or cause to be provided, performance testing facilities as follows: <40 CFR 60.S(e)>
[Rule 3D.0524)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Sampling ports adequate for the applicable test methods. This includes:
(i)
(ii)
constructing the air pollution control system such that volumetric flow
rates and pollutant emission rates can be accurately determined by
applicable test methods and procedures and
providing a stack or duct free of cyclonic flow during performance tests,
as demonstrated by applicable test methods and procedures .
Safe sampling platform(s) with safe access.
Utilities for sampling and testing equipment.
9
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.17
2.18
2.19
2.20
(d) Unless otherwise specified in the applicable subpart, each performance test shall
consist of three separate runs using the applicable test method. Each run shall be
conducted for the time and under the conditions specified in the applicable
standard. For purposes of determining compliance with an applicable standard,
the arithmetic means of results of the three runs shall apply.
NSPS -Modification -Except as provided under 40 CFR 60.14 paragraphs (e) and (f), any
physical or operational change to an 1existing facility which results in an increase in the emission
rate to the atmosphere of any pollutant to which a standard applies shall be considered a
modification. Upon modification, an existing facility shall become an affected facility for each
pollutant to which a standard applies and for which there is an increase in the emission rate to the
atmosphere.
1Existingfacility means" ... any apparatus of the type for which a standard is promulgated
in this part, and the construction or modification of which was commenced before the
date of proposal of that standard; or any apparatus which could be altered in such a way
as to be of that type."
NSPS -Reconstruction -An existing facility, upon reconstruction, becomes an affected
facility, irrespective of any change in emission rate. "Reconstruction" means the replacement of
components of an existing facility to such an extent that:
(a) the fixed capital cost of the new components exceeds 50 percent of the fixed
capital cost that would be required to construct a comparable entirely new facility,
and
(b) it is technologically and economically feasible to meet the applicable standard set
forth in this part.
An owner that proposes to reconstruct an existing facility shall notify this department of the
proposed replacements in writing postmarked at least 60 days ( or as soon as practicable) before
construction of the replacements is commenced and must include the information as required in
40 CFR 60.15( d) (1) through (7)
NSPS -Good Air Pollution Control Practice -At all times, including periods of startup,
shutdown, and malfunction, the permittee shall, to the extent practicable, maintain and operate
any affected facility including associated air pollution control equipment in a manner consistent
with good air pollution control practice for minimizing emissions.
<40 CFR 60.ll(d)> !Rule 3D.0524]
NSPS -Circumvention -Permittee shall not build, erect, install, or use any article,
machine, equipment or process, the use of which conceals an emission which would otherwise
constitute a violation of an applicable standard under 40 CFR 60. Such concealment includes,
but is not limited to, the use of gaseous qiluents to achieve compliance with an opacity standard
or with a standard which is based on the concentration of a pollutant in the gases discharged to
the atmosphere. <40 CFR 60.12> [Rule 3D.0524]
10
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
2.21 NSPS -General provisions -The permittee shall comply with all requirements concerning
notifications, testing, monitoring and recordkeeping specified in the general provisions of the New
Source Performance Standards (40 CFR 60 Subpart A). <40 CFR 60 Subpart A>
[Rule 3D.0524]
Note to pennittee -Other reporting requirements may be listed in subsequent sections for specific
emission sources or groups of sources. Read these sections carefully.
3.1
SECTION 3:
EMISSION SOURCE CONDITIONS, LIMITATIONS,
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
General emission source emission limitations
(a) Control of visible emissions -Visible emissions for sources established after July I,
1971 shall not exceed 20% opacity when averaged over a six-minute period except
that six-minute periods averaging not more than 87% opacity may occur not more
than once in any hour nor more than four times in any 24 hour period as determined by
U.S. EPA Reference Method 9 (40 CFR 60 -Appendix A, amended November 14,
(b)
(c)
(d)
I 990, or the most recent, approved version of the method at the time of testing).
[Rule 3D.052l(d)]
Control of visible emissions -Visible emissions for sources existing as of July I,
1971 shall not exceed 40% opacity when averaged over a six-minute period except
that six-minute periods averaging not more than 87% opacity may occur not more
than once in any hour nor more than four times in any 24 hour period as determined by
U.S. EPA Reference Method 9 (40 CFR 60 -Appendix A, amended November 14,
1990, or the most recent, approved version of the method at the time of testing).
[Rule 3D.0521(c)]
Air Toxics -General -Upon the written request of the Director and in accordance
with Section 3D. l l00 ("Control of Toxic Air Pollutants") of the FCAQTC, the permittee
shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director that the facility's emissions of the
toxic air pollutants listed in Section 3D. l l00 do not cause or contribute to any significant
ambient air concentration that may adversely affect human health. The submission of this
demonstration shall be made in accordance with Rule 3H.0610. [Sections 3D.1100 and
Rule 3H.0610]
Particulate allowable emission rate -Emissions of particulate matter from the
equipment listed in Section I shall not exceed the allowable emission rate calculated by
the equation E = 4.10 * P067; where E = allowable emission rate for particulate matter in
lb/hr, and P = process weight rate in tons/hr. !Rule 3D.05151
11
I
It
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r"
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I I
3.2 Specific emission source permit conditions -Three-process operation facility
Emission Emission Source Description Control Control Device Emission
Source Device Description Point
ID No. ID No. Number
COS-I # I COS line: Mark VII COS line, R-4 RADCO#4 49
JCI-11 stacker & conveyors,
Mr. Dust
COS-2 #2 COS line: Mark VII COS line, R-5 RADCO#5 49
JCI-11 stacker & conveyors,
Mr. Dust
COS-3 #3 COS line: Mark VII COS line, R-6 RADCO#6 49
JCI-11½ stacker & conveyors,
Mr. Dust
COS-4 #4 COS line: Mark VII COS line, R-7 RADCO #7 49
JCJ-11½ stacker & conveyors,
Mr. Dust
#5 COS line: conveying system, R-10 RADCO #IO 49
Mark X COS, Mr. Dust
COS-5
#5 COS line: JCI-II stacker R-8 RADCO#8
#5 COS line: Mark X Flux Fumes and DCE DCE/DLM 4-3-10
Mr. Dust
#6 COS line:JCI-II Model II stacker and R-9 RADCO#9 49
COS-6 conveyors, Mark X COS line
#6 COS line: Torit cartridge filter DCE DCE/DLM4-3-I0
COS-7 #7 COS line: MARK VII COS line, R-11 RADCO #II 49
JCl-11 stacker, Mr. Dust
COS-8 #8 COS line: Mark VII COS line, R-13 RADCO #13 192
JCI-11½ stacker & conveyors
The emission sources and control devices listed above are subject to the following terms, conditions, and
limitations:
(a) Opacity -The three-process operation facility shall not exceed 0% opacity as
determined by EPA Method 9 ( 40 CFR 60 -Appendix A, amended Nov. 14, 1990, or the
most recent, approved version of the Method at the time of testing).
<40 CFR 60.372(a)(7)> [Rule 3D.0524)
12
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,.
I
I
I
I
I
3.3
(b) Lead emissions -The three-process operation facility shall not discharge to the
atmosphere gases that contain lead from the process in excess of 0.00044 grains/dscf as
determined by EPA Reference Method 12 ( 40 CFR 60 -Appendix A, amended Nov. 14,
1990, or the most recent, approved version of the Method at the time of testing).
<40 CFR 60.372(a)(3)> [Rule 3D.0524]
Specific emission source permit conditions -Grid casting facility
Emission Emission Source Description Control Control Device Emission
Source Device Description Point
ID No. ID No. Number
GC-1 # I grid caster uncontrolled 11
GC-2 #2 grid caster uncontrolled 12
GC-3 #3 grid caster uncontrolled 13
GC-4 #4 grid caster uncontrolled 6
GC-5 # 5 grid caster uncontrolled 5
GC-6 #6 grid caster uncontrolled 16
GC-9 #9 grid caster uncontrolled 3
SCII-M # 11 negative strip caster: uncontrolled 186
main flue
SCI2-M # 12 positive strip caster: uncontrolled 188
main flue
The emission sources and control devices listed above are subject to the following terms, conditions, and
limitations:
(a) Opacity -The grid casting facility shall not exceed 0% opacity as determined by EPA
Method 9 (40 CFR 60 -Appendix A, amended Nov. 14, 1990, or the most recent,
approved version of the Method at the time of testing). <40 CFR 60.372(a)(7)>
(Rule 3D.0524]
(b) Lead emissions -The grid casting facility shall not discharge to the atmosphere gases that
contain lead from the process in excess of 0.000 I 76 grains/dscf as determined by EPA
Reference Method 12 (40 CFR 60 -Appendix A, amended Nov. 14, 1990, or the most
recent approved version of the Method at the time of testing). <40 CFR 60.372(a)(l)>
[Rule 3D.0524]
13
D ..
R
I
I
I
I
I
I
rt
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
3.4 Specific emission source permit conditions -Paste mixing facility
Emission Emission Source Description Control Control Device Emission
Source Device Description Point
ID No. ID No. Number
PM-I # I & #2 Simpson paste mixers AAFB-3 #3 AAF baghousc 190
PM-2 (wet & dry),
# I & #2 OSI flash ovens
PM-3 #3 & #4 Simpson paste mixers AAFB-2 #2 AAF baghouse 81
PM-4 (wet & dry),
3 & #4 OSI flash ovens
PM-5 #5 pasting line: mixer & flash oven AAFB-1 # I AAF baghouse 81
PL-I # I pasting line R-1 #I RADCO 49
(expanded metal line #3):
divide / flatten / stack
PL-2 #2 pasting line R-2 #2 RADCO 49
( expanded metal line #I)
PL-3 #3 pasting line R-3 #3 RADCO 49
(expanded metal line #2)
PL-4 #4 pasting line R-14 #14 RADCO 105
PL-5 #5 pasting line: paster & collector R-12 #12 RADCO 185
PBO-A PbO storage tank "A" FK-A Flex-Kleen baghouse 27
"A" (With SMD)
PBO-B PbO storage tank "B" FK-8 Flex-Kleen baghouse 28
"B" (With SMD)
PBO-C PbO storage tank "C" FK-C Flex-Kleen baghouse
"C" (With SMD) 122
OXT-5 & PbO storage tanks # 5 & #6 CF-I Cyelonaire cartridge
OXT-6 filter system 199
(Model # DC-84-25)
CF-2 Cyelonaire safety
monitoring filter
(Model# DC-84-25)
The emission sources and control devices listed above are subject to the following terms, conditions, and
limitations:
(a) Opacity -The paste mixing facility shall not exceed 0% opacity as determined by EPA
Method 9 (40 CFR 60 -Appendix A, amended Nov. 14, 1990, or the most recent,
approved version of the Method at the time of testing).
<40 CFR 60.372(a)(7)> [Rule 3D.0524[
14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(b) Lead emissions -The paste mixing facility shall not discharge to the atmosphere gases
that contain lead from the process in excess of0.00044 grains/dscfas determined by EPA
Reference Method 12 ( 40 CFR 60 -Appendix A, amended Nov. 14, 1990, or the most
recent, approved version of the Method at the time of testing). <40 CFR 60.372(a)(2)>
[Rule 3D.0524]
3.5 Specific emission source permit conditions -Lead oxide manufacturing facility
Emission Emission Source Description Control Control Device Emission
Source Device Description Point
ID No. ID No. Number
SOY-I Sovema oxide mill # I SOVB-1 Sovema baghouse 178
SOVH-1 Sovema HEPA filter
SOV-2 Sovema oxide mill #2 SOVB-2 Sovema baghouse 175
SOVH-2 Sovema HEP A filter
SOV-3 Sovema oxide mill #3 SOVB-3 Sovema baghouse 179
SOVH-3 Sovema HEPA filter
SOV-4 Sovema oxide mill #4 SOVB-4 Sovema baghouse 180
SOVH-4 Sovema HEP A filter
SOV-5 Sovema oxide mill #5 SOVB-5 Sovema baghouse 183
SOVH-5 Sovema HEP A filter
SOV-6 Sovema oxide mill #6 SOVB-6 Sovema baghouse 184
SOVH-6 Sovcma HEPA filter
HRD-S South Hardinge oxide mill CD34 baghouse with Gore-34
and Tex bags: "Mikro-
PbO storage tanks # I and #2 Pulsaire" #36S-8-30
HRD-N North Hardinge oxide mill CD38 baghouse with Gore-38
and Tex bags: "Mikro-
PbO storage tanks #3 and #4 Pulsaire" #36S-8-30
15
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
fl
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
VENT-I Bearing vents for north and south CD87 baghouse with Gore-87
Hardinge oxide mills Tex bags: "Mikro-
Pulsairc" #64S-8-20
CD87A HEPA filter
( custom made)
The emission sources and control devices listed above are subject to the following terms, conditions, and
limitations:
3.6
(a) Opacity -The lead oxide manufacturing facility shall not exceed 0% opacity as
determined by EPA Method 9 (40 CFR 60 -Appendix A, amended Nov. 14, 1990, or the
most recent, approved version of the Method at the time of testing).
<40 CFR 60.372(a)(7)> [Rule 3D.0524)
(b) Lead emissions -The lead oxide manufacturing facility shall not discharge to the
atmosphere gases that contain lead from the process in excess of O. 0 IO pounds of lead per
ton oflead feed as determined by EPA Reference Method 12 ( 40 CFR 60 -Appendix A,
amended Nov. 14, 1990, or the most recent, approved version of the Method' at the time
of testing). <40 CFR 60.372(a)(4)> (Rule 3D.0524)
Specific emission source permit conditions -Other lead-emitting operations
Emission Emission Source Description Control Control Device Emission
Source Device Description Point
ID No. ID No. Number
PP-I post pouring# I (south) AAFH-1 AAF HEPA filter 62
PP-3 post pouring #3 (north) AAFH-3 AAF HEPA filter 118
CV-I housekeeping central vacuum CVCF-1 cartridge filter 85
CV-2 housekeeping central vacuum CVCF-2 cartridge filter 98
RV-I RADCO vacuum system # 1 RVFF-1 Reinke metal fabric 84
(pasting RADCO's) filter
RV-2 RADCO vacuum system #2 RVFF-2 Reinke metal fabric 127
(COS RADCO's) filter
APB-I # I JCI automatic post builder TOR-I Torrit AC-2 filter# I 119
APB-2 #2 automatic post builder TOR-I Torri! AC-2 filter# I 119
16
I
It
D
D
D
B
n
D
D
n
D
n
APB-3 #3 automatic post builder TOR-2 Torri! AC-2 filter #2 119
APB-4 #4 automatic post builder TOR-2 Torrit AC-2 filter #2 119
APB-5 #5 automatic post builder TOR-3 Torrit AC-2 filter #3 119
APB-6 #6 automatic post builder TOR-3 Torrit AC-2 filter #3 119
APB-7 #7 automatic post builder TOR-4 Torrit AC-2 filter #4 119
APB-8 #8 automatic post builder TOR-4 Torrit AC-2 filter #4 119
CHEMI-M # I curing chamber uncontrolled 167
CHEM2-M #2 curing chamber uncontrolled 165
CHEM3-M #3 curing chamber uncontrolled 163
CHEM4-M #4 curing chamber uncontrolled 161
CHEM5-M #5 curing chamber uncontrolled 157
CHEM6-M #6 curing chamber uncontrolled 196
CHEM7-M #7 prototype curing chamber uncontrolled 195
CHEM8-M #8 curing chamber uncontrolled 198
CC-I # I Sovema cylinder caster uncontrolled 176
CC-2 #2 Sovema cylinder caster uncontrolled 182
TOO-I OSI gas-fired trim dry oven# I uncontrolled 171
(serving expanded metal line# I)
TD0-2 OSI gas-fired trim dry oven #2 uncontrolled 172
(serving expanded metal line #2)
TD0-3 OSI gas-fired trim dry oven #3 uncontrolled 193
(Serving expanded metal line #3)
The emission sources and control devices listed above are subject to the following terms, conditions, and
limitations:
(a) Opacity -The "other lead-emitting operations" shall not exceed 0% opacity as
determined by EPA Method 9 (40 CFR 60-Appendix A, amended Nov. 14, 1990, or the
most recent, approved version of the Method at the time of testing).
<40 CFR 60.372(a)(7)> [Rule 3D.0524]
17
B
It
g
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
(b)
Emission
Source
ID No.
COS-8
APB-8
• CC-1
• CC-2
• CHEl\16-M
• CHEl\17-M
• CHEl\18-M
• TDO-1
* TDO-2
• TDO-3
SCI 1-M
SCl2-M
• SOV-1
Lead emissions -The "other lead-emitting operations" shall not discharge to the
atmosphere gases that contain lead from the operations in excess of0.00044 grains/dscf
' as determined by EPA Reference Method 12 (40 CFR 60 -Appendix A, amended Nov.
14, 1990, or the most recent, approved version of the Method at the time of testing).
<40 CFR 60.372(a)(6)> [Rule 3D.0524)
SECTION 4:
CONSTRUCTION I MODIFICATION
Emission Source Description Control Control Device Emission
Device Description Point
ID No. Number
#8 COS line: Mark VII COS line, R-13 RADCO #13 192
JCI-11½ stacker & conveyors
#8 JCI automatic post builder TOR-I Torrit AC-2 filter #I 119
# I Sovema cylinder caster uncontrolled 176
#2 Sovema cylinder caster uncontrolled 182
#6 curing chamber uncontrolled 196
#7 prototype chamber uncontrolled 195
#8 curing chamber uncontrolled 198
OSI gas-fired trim dry oven # I uncontrolled 171
(serving expanded metal line #I)
OSI gas-fired trim dry oven #2 uncontrolled 172
(serving expanded metal line #2)
OSI gas-fired trim dry oven #3 uncontrolled 193
(serving expanded metal line #3)
# 11 negative strip caster: uncontrolled 186
main flue
# 12 positive strip caster: uncontrolled 188
main flue
Sovema oxide mill # I SOVB-1 Sovema baghouse 178
SOVH-1 Sovema HEPA filter
18
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
• SOV-2
• SOV-3
• SOV-4
• SOV-5
• SOV-6
•• HRD-S
•• HRD-N
•• VENT-I
OXT-5 &
OXT-6
PM-I
PM-2
PL-I
Sovema oxide mill #2
Sovema oxide mill #3
Sovema oxide mill #4
Sovema oxide mill # 5
Sovema oxide mill #6
south Hardinge oxide mill
and
PbO storage tanks # I and #2
north Hardingc oxide mill
and
PbO storage tanks #3 and #4
bearing vents for north and south
Hardingc oxide mills
PbO storage tanks #5 & #6
# I & #2 Simpson paste mixers
(wet & dry),
# I & #2 OSI flash ovens
# I pasting line
(expanded metal line #3):
divide / flatten / stack
19
SOVB-2 Sovema baghouse 175
SOVH-2 Sovema HEP A filter
SOVB-3 Sovema baghouse 179
SOVH-3 Sovema HEPA filter
SOVB-4 Sovema baghouse 180
SOVH-4 Sovcma HEP A filter
SOVB-5 Sovema baghouse 183
SOVH-5 Sovema HEPA filter
SOVB-6 Sovema baghouse 184
SOVH-6 Sovema HEPA filter
CD34 baghousc with Gore-Tex 34
bags: "Mikro-Pulsairc"
#36S-8-30
CD38 baghousc with Gore-Tex 38
bags: "Mikro-Pulsairc"
#36S-8-30
CD87 baghousc with Gore-Tex 87
bags: "Mikro-Pulsairc"
#64S-8-20
CD87A HEPA filter
( custom made)
CF-I Cyclonairc cartridge 199
filter system
(Model # DC-84-25)
CF-2 Cyclonairc safety
monitoring filter
(Model # DC-84-25)
AAFB-3 #3 AAF baghousc 190
R-1 #I RADCO 49
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r"
I
I
I
I
I
I
PM-5 #5 pasting line: AAFB-1 # I AAF baghouse 81
mixer & flash oven
PL-5 #5 pasting line: R-12 #12 RADCO 185
paster & collector
The emission sources, listed in Section 4, that are identified with an asterisk(") are subject to the
NSPS Notification requirements described in Permit Condition 2.12 on pages 8-9 of this permit.
The emission sources, listed in Section 4, that are identified with a double asterisk("") are subject
to the NSPS Notification requirement described in paragraph (e) of Permit Condition 2.12 on
page 9 of this permit.
4.1 Authorization to operate -This permit# 00725R8 authorizes the construction/operation of
the equipment listed in Section 4 in accordance with the permit application and attendant
information. [Rule 3Q.0304(i))
4.2
4.3
4.4
Notification requirement -The permittee shall provide the Environmental Affairs Department
written notification of the following: [Rule 3Q.0308(a)(l)I
(a)
(b)
date of construction of the equipment listed in Section 4, postmarked no later than
thirty (30) days after such date.
actual date of initial startup of the equipment listed in Section 4, postmarked
within 15 days after such date.
Performance testing and opacity observations -Performance testing as described in 40 CFR
60.8 and opacity observations as described in 40 CFR 60.11 are required for stack numbers: 34,
38, 49, 81, 87,171, 172, 175, 176, 178, 179, 180, 182, 183, 184, 186, 188, 190, 192, 193, 195,
196, 198, and 199. Within 60 days after achieving the maximum production rate at which the
facility will be operated, but no later than 180 days after the initial start-up of the affected facility,
the permittee shall conduct the required performance test and submit a written report of the test
to the Environmental Affairs Department. As part of the performance testing, lead emissions shall
be determined using EPA Reference Method 12 (40 CFR 60 -Appendix A, amended Nov. 14,
1990, or the most recent, approved version of the Method at the time of testing), and opacity
shall be determined using EPA Method 9 (40 CFR 60 -Appendix A, amended Nov. 14, 1990,
or the most recent, approved version of the Method at the time of testing). <40 CFR 60.S(a)>
[Rule 3D.0524) [Rule 3Q.0308(a)(l)(
Emissions testing to assure compliance with emission control standards -In order to assure
compliance with emission control standards for lead, the permittee shall conduct emissions testing
on the following emission points: 3, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 16, 27, and 28. The emissions testing shall
be completed and a written report of the testing shall be submitted to the Environmental Affairs
Department no later than November 2, 1997 (18 months after the effective date of permit
00725R 7). As part of the emissions testing, lead emissions shall be determined using EPA
Reference Method 12 (40 CFR 60 -Appendix A, amended Nov. 14, 1990, or the most recent,
approved version of the Method at the time of testing). [Rule 3D.0S0l(b))
20
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
4.5
4.6
4.7
Construction deadline for:
(a) COS-8: #8 COS line (Mark VII COS line, JCI-U½ stacker & conveyors)
(b) APB-8: #8 JCI automatic post builder
-if the construction/modification of this equipment has not commenced as of November 26, 1996
(18 months after the effective date of permit 00725R3), the permittee must reapply for a permit
to construct or modify this equipment. Under no circumstances may an applicant reserve
increment beyond this 18 month period. Any increment that has been set aside as consumption
due to this construction will be re-evaluated at that time. !Rule 3Q.0309(6)]
Construction deadline for:
(a) CC-1: #1 Sovema cylinder caster
(b) TDO-1: OSI gas-fired trim dry oven #1
(c) SOV-2: Sovema oxide mill #2
-If the construction/modification ofthis equipment has not commenced as of March 13, 1997 (18
months after the effective date of permit 00725R4), the permittee must reapply for a permit to
construct or modify this equipment. Under no circumstances may an applicant reserve increment
beyond this 18 month period. Any increment that has been set aside as consumption due to this
construction will be re-evaluated at that time. [Rule 3Q.0309(6)1
Construction deadline for:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
CC-2:
TDO-3:
SOV-1:
SOV-3:
SOV-4:
SOV-5:
#2 Sovema cylinder caster
OSI gas-fired trim dry oven #3
Sovema oxide mill #1
Sovema oxide mill #3
Sovema oxide mill #4
Sovema oxide mill #5
(g) SOV-6: Sovema oxide mill #6
(h) SCll-M: #11 negative strip caster: main flue
(i) SC12-M: #12 positive strip caster: main flue
G) CHEM6-M: #6 curing chamber
(k) CHEM7-M: #7 prototype curing chamber
(I) CHEM8-M: #8 curing chamber
(m) PM-5: #5 pasting line: mixer & flash oven
(n) PL-5: #5 pasting line: paster & collector
(o) PM-1: • #1 pasting line (expanded metal line #3): mixer & flash oven
(p) PL-1: #1 pasting line (expanded metal line #3): divide/ flatten/ stack
-lfthe construction/modification of this equipment has not commenced as of November 2, 1997
(18 months after the effective date of permit 00725R7), the permittee must reapply for a permit
to construct or modify this equipment. Under no circumstances may an applicant reserve
increment beyond this period. Any increment that has been set aside as consumption due to this
construction will be re-evaluated at that time. [Rule 3Q.0309(6)]
21
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
a
D
..
I
I
4.8 Construction deadline for:
(a) OXT-5: PbO storage tank #5
(b) OXT-6: PbO storage tank #6
-If the construction/modification of this equipment has not commenced as of February 1, 1998
(18 months after the effective date of permit 00725R8), the permittee must reapply for a permit
to construct or modify this equipment. Under no circumstances may an applicant reserve
increment beyond this period. Any increment that has been set aside as consumption due to this
construction will be re-evaluated at that time. [Rule 3Q.0309(6)[
22
I , ~
Forsyth County
Environmental Affairs Department
I .-
I
I
I
I
t'--
' ._,,_,.,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
October 20, 1997
James J. DiBiagio -ti-.~ .. -Technical Services Manager
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Battery Division
P.O. Box 1667
Kernersville, NC 27285
RE:· Extension of expiration date for Permit.#00725R8 to January 31, 1998
Dear Mr. DiBiagio:
Your facility's current permit to construct/operate (#00725R8) is due to expire on October 20,
1997. This letter is to inform you that this Department is extending the expiration date of the
permit. The new expiration date for permit to construct/operate #00725R8 is January 31,
1998.
This Department is in the process of drafting the initial synthetic minor permit for your facility
and anticipates receiving final U.S.EPA approval of the permit by January of 1998. we· prefer
to extend the expiration date of the current permit, rather than issue a revision of the non-synthetic
minor permit by October 20, 1997 and then issue a second revision of the permit incorporating
the synthetic minor requirements in just a few months.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
yj/~,/2___
Robert 0. Russ
Environmental Specialist·
[e-mail]. us
:,,,
•~1~,; -537 North Spruce Street -Wi11ston-Sa/em, NC 27101-1362 -Phone [phone] -Fax [phone]----' I @.~~~
n
g
a
I
I
I
I
g
'-I{ \
Forsyth County 01/P)~
Environmental Affairs Department If
July 17, 1997
James J. DiBiagio
Technical Services Manager
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Battery Division
P.O. Box 1667
Kernersville, NC 27285
Post-it• Fax Note 7671
To ::J:1""1,;.,,,i V ,' fs:,t ') ... 0
CoJDept. 5, j,, · C, -J j ~, rl_{.:;-, ,.., ---:, ~
Phone# /6/-I.SSo
Fax# 7.) ~ -t./i:JCf
Date 7/17/'17 l!a8~s► I
From l<c, b i?..,sJ·
Co. j::c._ C~1v. //ft ,s
Phone# 7.J 7-flat.o
Fax# 7.}7-J/777
RE: Extension of expiration date for Pennit #00725R8 to October 20, 1997
Dear Mr. DiBiagio:
Your facility's current permit to construct/operate (#00725R8) is due to expire on July 20, 1997.
This letter is to inform you that this Department is extending the expiration date of the permit by
three months. The new expiration date for pennit to construct/ operate #00725RS is October
20, 1997.
This Department is in the process of drafting the initial synthetic minor permit for your facility
and anticipates receiving final U.S.EPA approval of the permit within three months. We prefer
to extend the expiration date of the current permit, rather than issue a revision of the non-synthetic
minor permit by July 20, 1997 and then issue a second revision of the permit incorporating the
synthetic minor requirements in just a few months.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
rJ~o .. ~-~
Robert 0, Russ
Environmental Specialist
russro@co,Jorsyth.nc. us
"'~~---537 North Spruce Street. Winston-Salem, NC 17101-/361. Phone [phone] • Fax [phone]
1
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
• ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
le
u
D
General Infonnation/Certificati
0
on Statement cou=.1v Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department
1996 Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory ,
' '
Facility ID# 0D125 Facility Name Johasoo Coo±flD)s,:X:Nc:.. ::&:,~-ktLtJ G-~
FacilityAddress 2.7 0 I '""Jobosoo Cao±Q.ols Df.\ue,,
(Physical Street Number & Name
location of
facility)
City
NC'-1
State
212.is
Zip Code
Mailing Address _-p..._,_, -'=()'-'-' ..._Bo..=..,_,.X _ _,_, C,~(z><:7~-;--:;-,-,----:=-a:---------
(Mailing address Street Number & Name or P.O. Box
of facility -if
different from
Facility Address) City
Corporate Address 'P . 0 , }co )( 5 9 \
State
( if different Street Number & Name or P.O. Box
Zip Code
from Facility or
Mailing
Address)
WI 5':)201-059 (
City State Zip Code
Billing Address: ~ Permit Fee Invoice should be sent to (check one):
D,lf'acility Address O Mailing Address O Corporate Address
Standard Industrial Oassification Code(s) 3C:i 9 \
Primary Secondary Tertiary
Geographic Coordinates UTMEast 5']5. 2 UTMNorth
-or-
• "
,,
Latitude ------Lon~tude -------
Technical Contact Person C, n It I s :is=: ·, $be Ir
Title ~ Qv 0
1Qo11[0e,,Q-\o, \ Eo S?i\our Telephone A I0>7G 1-15'50
Inventory Preparer e,hll,\s r :she R. Telephone e 10) '16 /-1550
CERTIF1CATION STATEMENT (signed by owner/operator or responsible official after forms have been completed)
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information contained in this emissions report
and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the submitted information is true,
accurate and complete.
Signature Xu:.'--;{,,) ,.lo Date Signed <e,/36/9 7
Name/fitle "t<, "--"'-l--::,1c<.:>8E': e. 12.."t' Y1...,. ...,,
PRINT nm,c :ind title
.~OUTE RECEIVED ROU I l
0>r?.._ JUN 3 0 1997
FACILITY EMISSIONS SUMMARY •... I Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Afr Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
..
Total the emissions data from the Emission Source fonns on this Summarv form.
CRITERIA POLLUTANTS .
;,=,-----~= TSP (Total Particulate)
I PM10
502 (Sulfur Dioxide)
I NOx (Nitrogen Oxides)
_ voe (Vola1Jle Organic Compounds)
I CO (carbon Monoxide)
Lead
I
OTHER REGULATED POU.UTANTS
Chlorine
I
I
I _.
I
I
•
I
I
I
..
I
m
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
· Methyl Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
Ozone
Perchloroethylene
Phosphine
CASNUMBER
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
ACTIJAL POUNDS/YEAR
I ..
STACK I VENT INFORMATION (for Non-Title V facilities only)
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
Com lete this form for stacks and vents. Refer to the instructions for "combinin " stac~
I l~-/h-,-~~~---1~~~~~~-.!4!,~~----{I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ft li..l,L,1--,4----..-------./----ll..~~~~.......L.,-----l
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
g
*If the stack has a raincap, is horizontal or down turned, specify the velocity as 0.03
feet/sec. Also, if the stack is not round, please convert to the equivalent diameter using
the following formula: 2 x L x W / (L +W) where Lis the length and W is the width.
Specify the actual dimensions in the description section.
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
STACK I VENT INFORMATION (for Non-Title V facilities only)
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY!996 Emissions
Comnlete this form for stac~ and venls. Refer to the instructions for "combininr!" stacks.
STACK STACK OR VENT iHErGIIl DIAM FLOW TEMP. VELOCITY
ID# DESCRIPTION /feet\ /feet\ laofm) (OJ;\ If c:ct/scc \ ~, ~~c,\-nn I\,,_,_() ID 2.1 b'b~ I '1 "2, ,~,'l/)
Liq Vo.,+', l\.l~ o1._(',,.c: "t 11 i;-_,I 110, Cfl, "),2Q,00 -~ 'i""'-,. ~ TI · .
'" T " . -
I f-,f=, 1).--. ~-. a .~,"' ,O \5t/. h,s~ C10. '2.Ll.
,·9.5
\C\2_
~1
qr:.,
C\<I;,
"L"l
z. <i!
\1..--Z..
'Ml
171
~4
!'2.i
'\"" ./ ~7 lfl , .'S( i 2_LfqQ 10 -c, 4~ .l
~ '
c.,oc.. 0 ii::. 2,c..r r2.12.~ 9c '°!:)'?-.. ,I
Ox\,.\,; ~nu . <J. , 17-i q5j 9,L i::9 -~
~A,.,-.~ -1/ ,-, ,, n'1,-Jc i i; ). ~ 7tjoD 'i( 1-,4.5
r.A I...\ (e/ -~ ...--, i ~ u I i:::, \ , i to 2)-/-C( 9: ( '-: t./,S
~'oC) %IL I fl m,;, IL ,'1---:Z.. i0 ii1 IT
I • a(:,
I\ ,-t /1.,'-i 'b9:J 'b~ I' _(¼
Tl" \ 4 q::i., ~q 'bl' ,ry ,l\l.
' nc."11,..,.. '5 . ..LL I ':) ,C.ti ··ZSJ 9-.T ~,.~
\ · ...... r ."' . ,.r("\ S, :5-ter'\ \ .'S C/, .. IZCI" gl, 3l.5~
~-;-, \', .N~"' _\-'ffl'i\ \ ,~ ,S :< 1ocil ~L 170 .oi
, u I c; ,10 ILlOO RY l7a,og I\
,
.
*If the stack has a raincap, is horizontal or down turned, specify the velocity as 0.03
feet/sec. Also, if the stack is not rowid, please convert to the equivalent diameter using
the following formula: 2 x L x W / (L +W) ~here Lis the length and W is the width.
Specify the actual dimensions in the description section.
MISSION SOURCES EXHAUSTE
THRU STACK /ES#)
"DM ~ c;-1..j rns
PL I. 7 ~ J
CDS i . '2. '-,, _~ 1../ 5 6 1
'?L L/ • ' , , ,
~Li:::;
C.O'l.. <l
\)eA ~-1
CV-
C'.\/-7>
-pP-1'\ -A
P&J-R
Df (l-C.., z -,
0 ~-'-7
. ti D.D-C..
-H I? I') -[\J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# t\5 -,1
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
"""'"'
S ASSOCIATED WITH THIS
GAD
Hours/ ear:
June -Au .:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RATE
T·-• of Fuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa-Max. Firin~ Rate rMM Btu&r)
Qll ' c,. I'\ s ~l.)o NE'" ~ ,.,. I~ r' C • _. L 1' .:::_\... D ~ .
A nnuaJ Process Rate (include writs): l Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PUE
~ Control Device: . I Tl'\('., ll n+~ti 11 n ,.,I
Secondarv Control: TSP PMI0 voe SO2 ' NOx
Prim•~ Control Efficiencv /0/,)
Prirnarv Canture Efficiencv (%)
Secon"•~ Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Canture Efficiencv (%)
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
voe
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
LIST POLLUTANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" fonn if necessa
._,,____ ___ ---1---___ ,
I
I
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# H S-2
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CYl996 Emissions
SOURCEDESC
ASSOCIATED WITII
I OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
GAD
I
I
I
I
I
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
Tvne ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur
~o~ ~ " ¼ G,p.c.. 7
-.
• Process Rate (include units):
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMA TJON
, Control Device: l l n 00 n tl'.o l f,. d
Secondarv Control:
Prirnarv Control Efficienev (%)
Primarv Capture Efficien= (%)
Secondarv Control Efficien= /%)
P\J1
Annual Fuel Usaoe Max. Firing Rate rMM Btu/hrl
., " r "'<?-r t.0"\ \ c.s '" J\) c.. C r-,e.,e....,°t .
I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
PUE
TSP PMIO voe S02 NOx
Secondarv Capture Efficiencv (%)
I EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors PUE
I
I
I
I
I
I
CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
Ozone
Perchloroethylene
Phosphine
~ ~ ~ LIST POLLUTANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" fonn ifnecessarv ~ ~ ~
ACTUAL TONS/YR
i
CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
--11--------+----+------ii
I
I
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# H 5-~
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
SOURCE DESCRJPTJON:
ASSOCIATED WITH THIS
GAD
Annual Throu
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
P\J1
Tvnc ofFucl Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usage Max. Firin~ Rate /MM Btu/hr)
-Qp~ r \-r-, 1-P.'S &1r1\e.r l". 0'"\ \ <:..S, lO ~ S \.--.c e...+
·-.
IAnnua] Process Rate (include units): !Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMA TJON
P\JE
. , Control Device: l 1 0 UJ -f) + R.< I I ,., ~
Seccndarv Control: TSP PMIO voe S02 NOx
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Prim•"' Caoture Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Caoture Efficiencv ("lo)
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation or emission factors
OrnER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
iHHI UST POLLUTANTS -use" Additional Pollutants" fonn if ncecssarv lH!~
'.lf--------+---+---~I
I
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# H S,-L/
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY1996 Emissions
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
Hours/ vcar.
% June • Au12:.:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
PUO
Tvn.-ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa= Max. Firing Rate IMMBtu/hr)
.. \l.._p~,-\-o r--"'~ \l-, I \ f' f\ e_,. (' Ff")·,, s., ' t-) c-.
'. -• Process Rate (include units): ) Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PUE
,. Control Device: 0 f\ u, yy\:--o ~ \ I P ,-1
Secondary Control: TSP PMJ0 voe S02 NOx
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Primarv Capture Ef!iciencv (%) i
Secondarv Control Ef!iciencv (%)
Secondarv Caoture Ef!iciencv (%)
EMISSlONS SUMMARY FOR TJDS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors)
I
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
!HI l> LIST POLLUTANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" form if necessaiv l> l> l>
----------+-----•
I
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# H S-5
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY1996 Emissions
cwwv,
Dcc.-Feb.:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
PIJ1
T voe of Fuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usage Max. Firing Rate fMM Btu/hrl
~ ~ ~,,__r .\;-o C:,.. "-c::.. ~ \). Q •fH'., r F_m· 1 "-c ,
-n IV
•
Annual Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hour Iv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMA TJON
PUE
. , Control Device: \ ,\ A r~~ YIT" .,., I\ P d
SeconA•rv Control: TSP PMI0 voe SO2 NOx
Prirnsrv Control Efficiencv (%)
Prirnarv Caprure Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Capture Efficiencv (%)
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
CO Carb
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POU..UTANTS CASNUMBER ACTIJAL LBS/YR
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
LIST POLLUTANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" fonn if nccessarv
--1/--------+---+-------,i
I
I
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# H S -C,
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY1996 Emissions
SOURCEDESC
ASSOCIATED WITH THIS s
rO=P=E=RA==T.;IO;;;N.A=L==IN=F=-'O=RMA===T=l=O=N=====
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
;
,
;
=
;
=
a
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
;
,
;
F
"
:
=
=
~
=
;
i

ll'O"""=tin=H~o!!!u~rsc:.•_..tHo=•~rs.!./~d•e.r...· ---"="-'-==";;-==-"'='-'-"=_,...,::-:,.r===~~~~'-'-'-'=-"'-"'-"'""',,-;:!-:,!.}.1..:..1
.
.
-
1
1

. .
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE ""'
Tvn,,ofFuelUsed %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa"" Max. Firin,r Rate rMM Btu/hr)
~~ Q..., l,;-c G-f\S )-2-1.,1 Q. (\l ta' Q r'0, ,~'btc, v
•
:Annual Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PVE
.• Control Device:
Secondary Control: TSP PMI0 voe SO2 NOx
Primary Control Efficiencv ("lo)
Primarv Capture Efficiencv ("/, l
Secondarv Control Efficiency (% l
Secondarv Capture Efficiencv (%)
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR TlDS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors PVE
ACTUAL TONS/YR
CO Carbon Monoxide
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
LIST POLLlITANTS -use "AdditionaJ Pollutants" fonn if neccssarv
a.,-----+------r-------11
I
I
(ATTACH SUPPORTING OOCUMENTATION/CALCULA TIONS)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# t\5 -7
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY1996 Emissions
ASSOCIATED WITH IBIS
Annual Throusd, ut •
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE ""
T~ ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel usa~ Max. Firin" Rate n,.,a,r Btu/hr)
t)_~ Q.-C'" -\-n {'.,. /", <:. h rr-.: r ,-•,~,,-,. .
Annual Proecss Rate (mclude units): !Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PUE
Control Device:
Secon~•~ Control: TSP PMI0 voe SO2 NOx
Primarv Control Efficiencv fo/o)
Primarv Canture Efficiencv (% l
Secon"•~ Control Efficienev (% l
Secondarv Canture Efficienev (%)
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR TIIlS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
..
i,--------'T.:::S::..P-'-"===e:.:.n:.:d:::;ed::..:..P;:;artl""·c"'u::.:lat:.:.e::.... ______ _
PM 1 0 < icrons
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lead
OTIJER REGULATED POLLUTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
Ozone
Perchloroethylene
Phosphine
iHH, LIST POLLUTANTS. use "Additional Pollutants" fonn if neeessarv -i,-i, -1,
CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
--ll-----------1------+--
1.
I
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# \jS,,. 'D
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY!996 Emissions
OPERATIONAL JNFORMA TION
GAO
Hours/ da . Hours / vear.
Annual Throu h ut • o: June -Au .:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RATE
P\J1
Type ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usaire Max. Firing Rate fMM Btu/hr)
·-\<. o'-tcr--\-o G-F\ '"" 'F ~ \ C. C. ; /'"'\ " ... I u~E.ll .
Annual Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE JNFORMA TION
PUE
PrinJarv Control Device:
Seconn•rv Control: TSP PMIO voe S02 NOx
Prim•rv ControlEfficiencv (%)
Primarv Caoture Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Caoture Efficiency (%)
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR TIDS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors) PUE
ACTUAL TONS/YR
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
LIST POLLtITANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" form if necessarv
'.ir-------+----i---~
I
I
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# GC., ~ I
.. Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
,=-----..:FIRST.:;;;=.i;;,;===~=~i=s=i=9'i-''-"'F==n=So=u;;;n:,;;•;,;1:;;•rm==fo;,,r,;;ea;;:<;;,h,;;:em=iss=io;;;n
s
;
;
;
,
;
;
u
;
;
;
n
i
:
;
;
t
_
=
-
-
-
=
.
,
;
G
A
O
"
U
o
=
=
;
i

I
I Annual Throuizh ut -
Weeks I vcar.
0 Mar. -Mav: 2
Hour of rocess:
tcmbcr -Nov.:
I FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
, Tvoe afFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usaoe Max. Firin" Rate rMM Btu/hr)
P\n
Q~-\=Q.f' "TT) \-n" G-f\ <:, ' :), ll'1 tJ FI? Ef"""l°i "c:: ·10 f'lc:; . I
I
I
I
A ·' Process Rate (include writs): I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
Control Device: \ \ l\l ,-~ " \-a. ~ \ \ o ,..\
Secondarv Control: TSP PMIO voe
Primarv Control Ef!iciencv (%)
Primarv Caoture Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Control Efficicncv (%)
Secondarv Capture Efficicncv (%)
. ~ EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR TIIlS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation or emission factors
I
I
I
I
I
I
CRITERIA POU.lITANTS
Lead
OTHER REGUIATED POU.lITANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
ozone
Perchloroethylene ·
CASNUMBER
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
PUE
S02 NOx
PUE
ACTUAL LBS/YR
..
Phosphine
1-~-~-'~~~LIST=~PO=U,=lIT=ANT=.:cS_-.ccuse=-•'-'Ad"'d""ib~·ona1=~P-'ol~lu~tan~ts~•-'r,-"o~rm~if=""'==
=
r
v
-
-
'
-
~
-
'
~
-
'
~
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
i

1·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# (:,C., .. 2
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY1996 Emissions
ASSOCIATED wrrn THIS PR
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
Hours/ da . Davs/ week:
Annual Throullh ut • Dcc.-Fcb.:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
Tvne ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa.,, Max. Firin11 Rate /MM Btu/hr)
U..R.."TQ...l"' T"C\ ""' "
G-f\ <::. :),uo)Ji=-D Err-.\" c·,o f'IC: .
A 'Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PUE
, Control Device: \\n<!..On·hz,..,\\pr)
Secondarv Control: TSP PMI0 voe S02 NOx
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Primarv Caoture Efficjencv (%)
Secondarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Capture Efficiencv (%)
.. ,_E_MISSI __ o_N_s.,SU....,M._MA_.R __ Y....,FO.,R_.TlflS .... _S_O_UR_CE=='=•tt=•=c-h=ca=l=cu=l•=ti=·•=••=•=•=d-d_.ocum== .. •=•=t•..,ti=o•=• .. f=•m==iss=i•=n=f._ac=t=•rs==-.--------"""=,
I
I
I
I
I
I
1·
I
Lead
OTI!ER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene · 127184
7803-51-2
·--~-·· ..................... "T"t .. ,,.. .............. ,, .. .u::"1T/,T1n"11r.a1 r:111 ATIONS\
ACTUAL LBS/YR
0
,0
I
I
B
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# GC, '.:>
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CYl 996 Emissions
Annual Throullh ut •
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RATE
PIJ1
Tvne ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usaoe Max. Firin~ Rate fMM Btulbrl
0..R.,-,'.!Q..r -\-a \-',,, p C,-f\<:.. 'l,<1Qt-)!=O 'E. I"'), I ·" c °i O f\ <:. ' . .
• -• Process Rate (include units): !Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PUE
Control Device: \ I (\r ,-,. ~ + o ,-, \ \ P ---'
Secondarv Control: TSP PMI0 voe S02 NOx
Primarv Control Efficiencv ("lo)
Primarv Caoture Eflicienev ("lo)
SeconAmv Control Efficienev ("lo)
Secondarv Capture Efficiencv (%)
,.. EMlSSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors PUE
I
I
I
I
CRITERIA POU.UTANTS
Lead
OTHER REGULA TED POU.UTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
Ozone
Perchloroethylene ·
CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
..
Phosphine
,..~-~-~ __ LIST_~PO=U.~UT=ANTS=--~•-"useO'-"c.cA~ddc.cib~· o~nal=P~ol~lutan_ts~• £~o~rm=if-'n-'-'ec~essa=rv--'~-~-~'+---------t---------""11
7803-51-2
I
I ---·· ...... , ....... ,...,..~.,,... "',...r,1ui::t..1TI\Tinwr..01 r.111 ATIONSl
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# GC.. ~ L/
Ila, Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions.Inventory. CY1996 Emissions """"'
IF'""----:.===~~~~~=~~~~~~~~:::;_--~==~
I
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
Hours/ da : Weeks/ vcar: Hours/ ear.
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE PVI
T""" ofFucl Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa"" Max. Firinsr Rate fMM Btu/hr)
R~~~(" h \-'n p G-P\ <:. ~ CJ/I. tJ E Q Ef""l°i ._ <·10 f\<:. .
I
I
I
I
I
I
• Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
Control Device: \ I ,-._ r r, ",\-.Of\ \ \ o .r\
Secondary Control: TSP PMIO voe
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Primarv Caprure Efficiencv (%) ,
Secondary Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondary Caoture Efficieocv ("/4)
.. EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
I
D
u
I
I
I
CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647 --01--0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783--06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene -127184
7803-51-2
·--~ ..... , ... ,,n,..,..,,..Tt,.,,-n.n,....IIUC:"-ITi'i.TlnNtr..0.1 r.,u ATIONSl
PUE
S02 ' NOx
PUE
ACTUAL LBS/YR
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# GC..-5
Ii Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY1996 Emissions
....--~~~~~~~~~~----~°"""'~
I
I Hours/ da .
Annual Throu,zh ut •
I FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
T~ ofFucl Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa~ Max. Firin2 Rate IMMBtulbrl
PUI
UR..¥Q..r ~ \-\-\ D CPI.<:. ~ .. otJt=D El""')'1-:.c'1of\< .
I
I
I
. · Process Rate (include units): lMax. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
Control Device: TT r-. c..c ;:,. +n ,-. \\" ,...\
Secondarv Control: TSP PM!O voe
Primarv Control Efficien~ 1%)
Primarv Canture Efficien-• 1%)
Seconn•"' Control Efficiencv 1%)
Secondarv C•nture Efficiencv /%)
~ EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR TIIlS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
D
I
I
I
I
I
CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
voe
Lead
OrnER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene · 127184
· ·--• ,..,, c, tno""'DT1M~ nnr.1 IMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
"""
S02 NOx
"""
.00"79
ACTUAL LBS/YR
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# GC, ~ G, a. Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY1996 Emissions
-----.:..· ~FIRST~!..!:~~~~~~~9~~~~~~~~~~:;g~~~~~~~~-~.a
"
"
"
"
"
~
~

I N SOURCE DESC .
FUEL USAGFJPROCESS RA TE
T•-ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa-Max. Firin2 Rate rMM B!Ulbr)
o!t.~Q..r-h \-'n D G-f\<:. l5:: ,11) t-)~D C.1""'1\c:.c·1of\<: .
I
I
I
I
D
I
A=ua] Process Rate /include units): T Max. Hour Iv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
Control Device: \). <"\ r o l"\ ~ n ...,-\ \ o ,.I
Secondary Control: TSP PMIO voe
Primarv Control Efficien~ !% )
Primarv Caoture Efficienev !o/o)
Secon~•~ Control Efficiencv /%)
Secondarv Canture Ef!iciencv /%)
~EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
voe
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyt Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethytene · 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
. -

-
...... , .... •nnnn·r-...,~ f'\l"'\f"I O.A~NT.O.Tin~ur:.o., C:llLATIONS)
PUE
S02 NOx
ACTIJAL I.BS/YR
• C)C,
Qo
PUE
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# {;C.,-9 I
le
I
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory • CY! 996 Emissions
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
Hour of roce:ss:
tcmbcr • Nov.: 25
PU!
I
I
I
I
I
0
Type ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usaoc Max. Firin~ Rate !MM Btwbrl
U..~"rQ..r hi
""' p
{yf\<:, ), llQ.tJ F 0 Err--.',"' c·101"\< .
• ·' Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
Control Device: \).. l'\ I 0,.-,\\c,,-\
Secondary Control: TSP PMI0 voe
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Primarv Caoture Efficienev (%)
Secondarv Control Efficicn= (%)
Secondarv Caoturc Efficicncv (%)
me EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR TlflS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
CRITERIA POU.ITTANTS . ·
I
I
I
I
I
voe
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POU.ITTANTS CASNUMBER
Chlortne 7782-50-5
Fluortne 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
I ~ 1~~5-6
Perchloroethylene · 127184
S02 NOx
PVE
ACTUAL LBS/YR
Phosphine 7803-51-2
.. t-0;...0.:..0..:.....__,L!ST=:...PO=U.=UT~==·.;,:::;..."=,:,·o,·='-'P-"o""llu,::tan=ts:..." .:,fo::.,rm.::..:,if.,,n::::re::::cssa=rv-'---"0"-'0'-'0::.+--------+----,-:--.:-----11
1· 1,
· · --....... • ~• 1nn-"0T1,.,r-. nnr.r IMFNTATION/C:AI_CULATIONS)
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# A£P,:-I
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY!996 Emissions
GAD
Da / week: Hours / vear. tart Hour of rocess:
Annual Throu h ut -Dec. -Feb.: 25 o June • Auiz.:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
P\J1
T""" ofFucl Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa"" Max. Firinit Rate !MM Btu/hr)
U,f~r TO lt'nP GPrC fl, • r f)p r-F rn i CcC' 'io nc:.
•
Annual Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
Primarv Control Device:," " r : -\-().,-.. -l 4!. \ .L. ... '"'\
Secondary Control: TSP PMIO voe S02 NOx
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%) O\C\ .<\· I
Primary Capture Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Control Efficiency (%)
Secondary Capture Efficiencv (%)
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors PUE
TSP nded Particulate -----=---=~~-PM 1 0 alter <1 0 microns
Lead
OTHER.REGULATED POUUTANTS CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
-. 11----~L!..!...!------+---+~---II
I
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I
I ..
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# b£P:i-'2
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY!996 Emissions
Hours/ dav: Da / week: Woeks / vear. Hours/ vear.
Annual Throu h ut -Dec. -Feb.: 25 ° Mar. -Mav: 25 ° June -Au2.:
GAD
""' I FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
Tvr,e ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa..-Max. Firin2 Rate IMlvl Btu/hr\
I
u
I
I
TI n~l!..-r "f"o -\-'ho G-P<c -A: •rt"\<>~
. -' Process Rate /include units\:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
~ Control Device: T ~ " I' ; -\--P.,r, -7 ~,I.L.r
Second.arv Control:
Prim•rv Control Efficiencv /% \ °' "\ .~ "'l
Prim•rv Canture Efficiencv /% l '
Seconn•rv Control Efficien-• /% \
Secondarv Capture Efficien-• 1% \
F (() i •~ ·,one .
I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
'"' I
TSP PMI0 voe
~EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR TlilS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
I
I
I
I
CRITERIA POILUTANTS
CO Carbon Monoxide
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POILUTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
I
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
I
Methylene Chloride
Ozone
1·
I
Perchloroethylene·
CASNUMBER.
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
· ---_., _,,nn~OTIMr:: nnr.11MENTATION/CALCULATION!:>1 --.
""'
S02 NOx
PUE
q,
ACTUAL LBS/YR
I ..
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# b£B-?:,
. Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
Davs/ week: Hours/ vear: Start Hour of roccss:
Dc:c. • Feb.: 25 a June -Au2.:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RATE
Tvnc ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usaoe Max. Firine Rate IMMBtuibr)
'U of~r -\-o •t'he GP!.<:: R 'r ()P r-I=('()·, c:.c 01on<:..
•
I Annual Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hourly Process Rate:
I
I
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
Control Device:\" I' r ; t A,-, -/ -i:. IL. r
Secondary Control:
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%) U,Q, .Ci.' J
Primarv Caoture Efficiencv (%)
Seconrl,.v Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Capture Efficiencv (%)
PU£
~'2...
TSP PMIO voe S02 NOx
19 ,.E=MIS==SI=O=N,.S .. SU=M==MA=R=Y;..,F.;;;0,.;R;,;TIIl;,;,a;a;S.;;;S.aO .. UR==CE===•tt=•=c=h=ca=l=cu=l•=tt=·•=n=• •=n=d=d=•=c•=m=•=n=t•.,ti=•n==•r=•=m='iss=i=•n;;,;,;r•=ct=•="'===r-=-----
.
a
"
"
"
.
;
;
;
;
.
-
.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7564-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
7803-51-2
· ·-· ~ .. ~ .. nnnoTlw= nl"lr.llMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
q
ACTUAL LBS/YR
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# 6£Pi-S
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CYJ996 Emissions
I .. IE"'----------.:.;:,;;;;.=~~;;;i;~~~:,;;:i,;::;r.;;;;;i~~:;.:;;:;;,:~"F~~~~~~,;;:::~~
~
:
:
;
.
,
-
=
-
-
=
~
"
"
"
"
"
'
=
~
·

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
Hours -Hours / dav: Davs/ week: Hours / vcar: Hour of
Annual Throu h ut -Dec. -Feb.: 25 o June • Au2.:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
Tvne ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa"" Max. Firing Rate l'MMBtu/hrl
·\.I. o~l?_.,f -\-o thP Gf'I', R • r r,p,.. \-({)
01 C <" IQ r,C. .
I
I
I
D
D
I
I
Annual Process Rate (include units): !Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
Control Device: 1" " r : t-/\(' } -f-, \ -1-,, r-~ L
Secondarv Control: TSP PMIO voe
Primarv Control Efficiencv ("/4) "\ C\, '-1' l
Primarv Capture Efficiencv /%)
Secondarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Capture Efliciencv (%)
_. EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
1·
I
CO Carbon Monoxide
Lead
OTHER REGUIATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7547-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyt Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 1002S-15-6
Perchloroethytene · 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
· ----.. ~ .. nnnon.ir:: nnr.llMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
PUE
S02 NOx
PUE
ACTIJAL LBS/YR
I ..
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# b'£B-5
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY 1996 Emissions
OPERATIONAL JNFORMA TION
"""""'
"--tin• Houn -Hours/ dav: Davs/ week: Wccks/vcar: Hours/vcar. StartHourofnrocess: '7 A f-'\
0ercenlas!c Annual Throu2hout • Dec.• Feb.: 25 o/,. Mar. • Mav: 25 CZ: June • Au2.: '? 5 °1.'.' S=tcmbcr-Nov.: 25 %
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RATE
T...,,,. ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usauc Max. Firin~ Rate'""" Btu/hr)
'Q o ~12..-r -\-o ~hp G .,.c-o. r ("\O ~ F (() ·, c .-·,o nc.
•
I
I
I
D
I
'. · Process Rate <mclude units): I Max. Hour Iv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE JNFORMA TION
nrimarv Control Device: T -~ r :+ ~ ' ~TL~ #" 3
Seconrl•nr Control: TSP PMl0 voe
Primarv Control Efficiencv (% \ o,q .'-\ 1
Primary Canture Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Control Effici-~ (%)
Secondarv Capture Efficiencv (%)
If" EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR TlllS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors)
I
I
I
I
I
CRITERIA POUUTANTS
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POUUTANTS
Chlortne
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
I Methylene Chloride
Ozone
I
I
Perchloroethylene
CASNUMBER
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
·-------·--,....,...,,.,c,.,T,..Tin~,,r-r,,r r.111 0.TlONSl
PUE
S02 NOx
PUE
°' ACTIJAL LBS/YR
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# A-PB-Q,
It Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CYl996 Emissions
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
GAD
Hours/ dav. . Weeks/ vear: Hours/ vear:
Mar.• Mav: 25 "' June • Au2.:
FUEL USAGFJPROCESS RA TE
P\A
Tvoc ofFw:l Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa"" Max. Firin2 Rate IMM Btu/hr)
'Q p_f~r -to -\-\-,.p Gf'l'.C R , r f"'lo .r C. (Tl i <:.c ·,o nc.
•
I
I
I
I
0
I
Annual Process Rate (include units): !Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PUE
, Control Device:," " I' :-\-Al" 7 -{!, \-i-...r ~<..
Secondarv Control: TSP PMIO voe S02 NOx
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%) '-\ '-\ ':-"\ I
Primarv Caprure Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Control Efficiencv ("lo) I Secondarv Caoture Efficiencv ("lo)
f9 lf'E=MISSI=-=..,_O,.N_S_S._U.,M.._MA.._R.,Y...,F,_,O.,,R.THI..,_..,s,.s
,
.
o
_
.
U
R
_
.
_
C
E
=
=
=
•
t
t
1
1
=
=
c
=
h
=
c
a
=
l
=
c
u
.
,
I
=
•
t
i
=
o
=
n
=
s

=••=d=d=o._cum==•,..n.,ta,.ri=on...,of=•=m=iss=i=on==f•,,.ct=or.;...,-,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
=
-
P
U
E
,
_
.
-
s
,

I
I
I
I
I
CRITERIA POLLtITANTS
Lead
OffiER REGULATED POLLtITANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
I
Methylene Chloride
Ozone
I
I
Perchloroethylene
CASNUMBER
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
· ----• • -• onnnn~w:: nrV'.I IMF'NTATION/CALCULATIONS)
ACTUAL LBS/YR
•
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# A£B ~ 7
..
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY 1996 Emissions
"""""'
I
I
0
I
I
I
ir-------..:.=~=~~;;,;;;i.;:~~~~~~~~~==~=-~~~
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
GAO
Hours/ dav: Davs/ week: Hours /vcar.
Annual Throuoh ut -Doc. -Feb.: 25 c, June:. Amt:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
T""" afFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usaoe Max. firing Rate rMM Btu/hrl
'Qpf~r TO thP GPr.<:: R , r f'oP,... r (11 '1 cc-·,one. .
'Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PVE
. Control Device:," r-r ; +-Ar J -f, \ .(..., ... * Lj
Secondarv Control: TSP PM!O VOC S02 NOx
· Primarv Control Efficiencv (%) U,. '-\ , "'\ 1
Primarv Caprure Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Caprure Efficiencv (%)
~ EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
PVE
I
I
I
I
I
I
voe unds
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 1271 84
C\
ACTUAL LBS/YR
Phosphine 7803-51-2
-. l'l>::..l>:::...::.l>_--'UST=!.;..POs:LL"="=":"-=·=::..•.=:ei,etional='-'P-"o,::llu:::tan=tsc." .,,foe,nn!!..!!if_,,n==.1....---'l>'-'l>::..l>::;+--------+---------~
••
I · · ..,......,. ,....., c, roononr-..1~ nor.I IMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I
I
I
I
0
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# &£B-2
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY 1996 Emissions
GAO
Hours/ dav: Hours / vcar:
Annual Throu h ut • June -Au2.:
FUEL USAGJ!JPROCESS RA TE
T~ ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa.,. Max. Firin~ Rate IMM Btu/hr\
'00+1?.-r ~o !-t-hP Gl'l'.c R • r ('\O ~ i,;;; (() i '~ 0
10 l"\C .
Annual Process Rate (mclude units): !Max. Hourlv Proc= Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
Control Device:·"\ o r r : \ I\(, ::, .C.'\l.-~ ctt-U
.
Secondarv Control: TSP PMIO voe S02 NOx
Prim•nr Control Efficien~ /% \ C\'-1 ,'1' l
Prim•~ Caorure Efficienev 1% \
Seconn•rv Control Efficien= (%)
Secondarv Caoturc Efficiencv (%)
..
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR T}IlS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
CRITERlA POlllITANTS
PUE
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lead
OIBER REGULATED POUITTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyt Chlorofonn
Methytene Chloride
Ozone
Perchloroethytene
Phosphine
CASNUMBER ACTIJAL LBS/YR
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
.. ~~:c:~:c:~,:__!,=~-====~=====~====:.__:::~::,_~::,.~4.-_______ +---~-----ll
I
I (ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMEN-:-:;;::::J/CALCULATIOl'J5).
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
0
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# C _\\ 't.tl\ I -r'\
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY1996 Emissions
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
Hours/ da . Davs / week: Weeks / ear. Hours/ ear: Hour of roccss: 'l
Annual Throu•h ut -Dec. -Feb.: 2 5 o Mar. -Mav: June -Au~.: tcmbcr-Nov.:25
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
P\JI
T-une ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa2e Max. Firin2 Rate rMM Btu/hr\
Q_\'_~~ -\:-;:::: e.., G-1'15 -~\J. o )vc-D b ' ' ,r, I < c-•~ • I
•
· Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PUE
IPrimarv Control Device: Un con fa_,.-., 1\--,:_r
Seconrlarv Control: TSP PMI0 voe S02 NOx
Primarv Control Efficien~ /%)
Prim•~• Canture Efficien~ /%)
Secon"·-• Control Efficien~ /%)
Seconrlsn1 Canture Efficiencv 1%)
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR TlilS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors PUE
Lead • 0 00 L//
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
Chlorine 7782-5D-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6 .
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
{HJ.<! LIST POLLUTANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" fonn if ncccssarv <l<l<l
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I
I
0
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# lJ\ f ~2-f"\
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
°"°""
~ON SOURCE DESCRIPTION~?_
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE ""'
T= afFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usaae Max. Firing Rate rMM Btu/hr)
0-\"-.~ ~ -t~e... ::;..Fl 5 ·.:i...uo lJ-=-D 'I== • ' f1"\,c..-,~,1
•
· Process Rate (include writs): I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PUE
~ Control Device: U "C,o ~+-o -I 1---'
Scconn,ru Control: TSP PMIO voe S02 NOx
Prim•~ Control Efficienev (%)
Primarv Canture Efficien= (%)
Secondarv Control Efl:icien~ (% \
Secondary Canrure Efl:icien~• (%)
..
EMISSlONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation or emission factors
CRITERIA POU.UTANTS
PUE
I
I
I
I
voe unds
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POU.UTANTS CASNUMBER
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-5~
I ~ 1~~
Perchloroethylene 127184
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
ACTUAL LBS/YR
Phosphine 7803-51-2
-. ~~::..~=~--'LIST=~PO=ll::.UT~ANTS~.!..:!.:-:..!"!:esc:...!" A~d!!!di!!!tio~nol=P~o!!!ll!,!!uta:!!!n!.!:tsc..".!!foc!!.nn=ifc!n~ec,o=s=~
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
~
:
:
.
.
~
=
~
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
'
l
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1

I
I i.-rr11f'.H SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# C1\'tJ•\?,-t\
.. Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CYl996 Emissions
ir-------='=="====~b=l•=•=k~fo;;;nn....,~th=•=•=co=m¥le~te,.o=n=e=E
=
m
i
i
s
s
=
i
•
=
•
=
S
o
=
u
=
r
c
e
=
f
=
•
n
n
=
=
f
o
=
r
=
e
•
=
'
=
h
=
e
m
=
=
i
s
s
=
i
•
=
n
s
;
;
;
.
;
u
;
.
;
n
i
=
t
=
=
-
=
=
=
.
;
"
"
°
"
"
=
=
'
~

I uf,
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
m · Hours -Hours / da .
crocntaizc Annual Throu•h ut -Mar.-Mav:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE ""'
T= ofFucl Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usaoe Max. Firino Rate rMM Btu/hr)
v~,:_" ~ \'v,e.., :;..p.5 P--u a. t-J i::-12 F ' . rn,c:.c,,-,,J
•
I
I
D
A • Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hour Iv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMA TJON
Primanr Control Device: \Jf\ e,o" -\-n "\ I -...I
Secondarv Control: TSP PMIO voe
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%)
I
Primarv Caoture Efficiencv (%)
Seconrurv Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Caoture Efficien"" /%)
~EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach cslculations and documentation of emission factors
CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
I
I
I
I
I
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
I
Methylene Chloride
Ozone
Perchloroethylene
CASNUMBER
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
PUE
S02 NOx
PUE
0001
ACTUAL LBS/YR
1 _ Phosphine
.. t-.()'-.()'-'-.() _ _,LlST=:.;..PO::cLL=UT=ANTS==•..:u:::se:..".!CAc:dd:::ib:::·onal=..:.P.,:o:cll
u
,
,
,
1
a
:
:
;
n
c
:
:
t
s
c
.
.
.
"
,_,foe.:nn=if.;.:•:::"':::"'::::':::•rv.,____;.():...():...().::+--------+--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1

I · · -· -.. ~"nn~oTI"C: nnr.llMF.NTATIONICALCULATIONS)
I
I
D
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# C ~ r.tf\'.-/ -f"\
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory. CY1996 Emissions
GAO
Hours/ da .
Annual Throu2h ut-
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
Tvnc ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa2e Max. Firin2 Rate rMM Bru/hrl
C-~~ ~ -t~e... :-:..As ·::i..uo 1',)ccO F ..,. .. :, < ,.·,_ • I .
Annual Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PUE
Control Device: CTnc.,o"' tnc \ I~..-\
Secondarv Control: TSP PMJO voe S02 NOx
Primsrv Control Efficiencv /%)
Prim·-· Canrure Efficiencv /%)
Secondarv Control Efficien"" 1% l
Secondarv Caoture Efficienev (%)
• .;E~MlSSI;.:.::;:;;::;O:;;:Na;:S::,:::SU::,M:::,::MA~R:!,Y:.!;F~O~R;aTHISa
:
,
:
,
:
~
S
~
O
~
U
R
~
C
;
a
:
a
E
~
•
t
t
~
•
:
;
;
<
~
h
.
:
;
c
a
:
:
;
l
~
c
u
~
l
•
:
,
:
l
i
:
;
:
'
o
~
n
•
:
,
,
;
•
:
:
;
n
:
;
:
d
:
,
:
d
:
;
:
o
:
;
;
:
c
u
m
~
e
a
:
:
n
,
:
:
t
a
~
t
i
:
;
:
,
o
n
~
•
f
:
,
:
:
e
~
m
:
:
;
i
s
s
:
:
;
:
i
~
•
•
:
:
,
,
:
:
f
a
:
;
;
:
c
t
:
:
;
o
r
s
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
:
"
"
;
;
;
;
•
:
.
.
,

..-
ACTUAL TONS/YR
I
I
I
I
I
Lead
01HER REGULATED POLLUTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
I Ozone
PerchloroetJl\,iene
Phosphine
05
.ooo
CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783.06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
I~ lH)~ LIST POLLUTANTS -US< • Additioual Pollutants" Conn if ncx:essarv
._ ..___ ___ ___j____...j..._---!
I
I IIITTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# r Wi:.tl\ 5-("\
L Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY1996 Emissions
!1911""' _____ .;.F,;;IR,;;ST...,,===~~~==-;'====¥:'--===~=="=rc=•=f=onn=l;;;o;.rc;;;•;;,<h;;,•;;;m
;
;
;
i
s
s
=
i
o
;
;
;
n
;
;
.
s

=""=i=L==~=--.;;""°"'"'~9
I
a
I
D
D
I
I
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
. How,;-Davs/ week:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE ""'
T,,,.,,. ofFucl Used ¾Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa~c Max. Firine: Rate fMM Btu/hr)
V-'.1..:....,-.\,,-, -tne..-['.,..F\ $ -iJ-.. u ll. Iv la' (2 r . , (f")1 <:.c, .... d .
Annual Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PUE
Control Device: \ l (\ c.,r-f"\-1-n"' \ \ p A
Secondarv Control: TSP PM!O voe S02 ' NOx
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Primarv Caoture Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Caoture Efficienr.v (%)
18 ,=Ea.MISSI"""'...,;O.,;N,.S ... s_,U.;M='MA=R-=Y=-FO=R.;TIIlS===S,.O=UR-=CE=='=•tt=•=c=h=ca=lcu==l•=
t
i
=
·
o
=
n
s
=
•
'
-
n
=
d
•
d
=
o
c
u
m
=
=
•
=
•
=
'
•
;
;
;
t
i
=
o
n
... o=f=em'=iss=i=on.,f=•=ct=ors='==.-=------=-PUE..;;.-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
.. 1·
I
Lead
.ooo 12
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER ACTTJAL LBS/YR
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethytene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
LIST POLLUTANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" fonn if neccssarv
,aTTM'." SI IPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# (' l\ 'i:YI'-$: t"\
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
I
I
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
Hours/ da .
ta,,e Annual Throu•h ut-
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RATE
I·-ofFuel Used %Ash
()_\_•-.~ ~ "t~e....
% Sulfur
G-A5
Hours/ ear: rt Hour of roccss: 'l
tcmbcr-Nov.:2'5
""'
Annual Fuel Usa"" Max. Firin2 Rate /MM Btu/hr)
.:i_u o tv c-6 \::-rr,\ c .-•,-•I
•
• · Process Rate !include units): !Max. Hourly Process Rate:
I
I
I
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
~ Control Device: t t nc.c A..\--11 ,-.. \ I ,-, ,...\
Secondarv Control:
Prim•~ Control Efficiencv (% l
Prim•rv Canture Efficien= ("lo l
Secon"•"· Control Efficiencv ("/, l
Secon~•rv Canture Efficien-• ("I,)
TSP PMI0 voe
• EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach cslculations and documentation of emission factors
r CRITERIA POllUTANTS
I
I
I
I
Lead
OTHER REGU!..A1ED POllUTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
I Ozone
Perchloroethylene
Phosphine
II _ <><><> I..ISTPOUUTANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" form ifncccssarv
CASNUMBER
7782-50-5
7782-4.1-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
PUE
SO2 NOx
PUE
• 0063)
ACTUAL LBS/YR
-.-------4-------1-----ll
ii
I ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMErJl ATION/CALCULATIONS)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# 'P'P -\
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
OPERATIONAL INFORMA TJON
GAO
Da / week: Weeks/ vear. Hours/ vear: tart Hour of rocess:
Dec. -Feb.: 2 '=i '., Mar.• Mav: 5 °0 June -Au•.: tember • Nov.: 2
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RATE
P\J1
Tvne ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa= Max. Firin• Rate r1v11v1 Btu/hr)
DA~"' r -\--,.. G,.. AC. 11)...l • r <'I' r trC\'.c~ '" ,, .
• •·ual Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
. P\JE
v Control Device: Af\c-\--\-' •• 1,-f\ t=" I-\ E. o " L' · \ ' r
Seconrlorv Control: TSP PMIO voe S02 NOx
Prirnarv Control Efficien-• f%) C\C\ ~'"l .
Prirnarv Caoture Efficiencv 1%)
Secondarv Control Efficienr.v 1%)
Secondarv C•nture Efficiencv /%)
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach.calculations and documentation of emission factors PIJE
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
{) {) {)
--~-----1-----+----
I
I
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
.. ,
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# '.P'P -2 I ..
I
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CYl 996 Emissions
ASSOCIATED WITH THIS P
I OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
Da / week: Weeks I vesr:
Dec. -Feb.: 2 '::> '., Mar. -Mav:
Hour of roccss: ;
tembcr -Nov.:
GAD
P\J1 I FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
Tvoc ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa£e Max. Firin£ Ratci/MM Btu/hr)
I
I
I
I
Q.5?,,,.. "t""t' G-AC.. "P--.1, rfl• r 'E.--n\c:.c-'" ., .
. · Process Rate (Include units): !Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
Control Device: \"\"-~ \-\~ Pf\ -1=':lk,
Secondary Control: TSP PMJ0 voe
Primarv Control Efficiency (%) \..\ "\ :=\' l
Primarv Caoture Efficiency /%)
Sccondarv Control Efficiencv /%)
Sccondarv Capture Efficiencv (%)
.. EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR TIUS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation or emission factors
I
I
I
I
I
CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
ded Particulate
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
I Methylene Chloride
Ozone
I
-1
Perchloroethylene
CNlNUMBER
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
P\JE
SO2 NOx
P\JE
ACTUAL LBS/YR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# SC., I \ -M
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY1996 Emissions
"""""'
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
GAO
Davs/ week: Weeks I vcar: Hours/ ca~ '.)
Dec. -Feb.: '2.5 MM. -Mav: 25 ° June • Au•.: 75°
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RATE
POI
Type ofFucl Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usage Max. Firing Rate /MM Btu/hr)
Q o \-Q. r--\-o G-A<-tl-1 llU,l I ·o \::" n--,\ C. C Ir. {') .
Annual Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PUE
, Control Device:
.. \lf\ t' t\ n""t '.-, 11 n el ...
Serondarv Control: TSP PMI0 voe SO2 NOx
Primarv Control Efficien= (%)
Primarv Capture Efficien= (%)
Secondarv Control Efficien= (%)
Secondarv Capture Efficien= ("/4)
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors PUE
CO Carbon Monoxide
Lead
OTHER REGUIATED POUUTANTS CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydra.tine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
LIST POLLUTANTS -use "AdditionaJ Pollutants" form if necessarv
---------~
I
I (ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I
I• EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# SC, I \ -C.,
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
GAO.<'UO
I s ASSOCIATED WITH
OPERATIONAL JNFORMA TJON
GAO
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· Hours• Hours / da . Da=/ week:
PerocntaRc Annual Throu•hout • Dec. -Feb.:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
T""" ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur
\2..c,_~c--\-o C':,-1::i.C... R11 e> 1. H
•--··' Process Rate (include units):
CONTROL DEVICE JNFORMA TION
' Control Device: ···-
Secondarv Control:
·o
Weeks/-~
Mar.-Mav:
Hours/ vear. ',{\'.)C:..start Hour oforocess: / A f'\
PU1
Annual Fuel Usa"" Max. Firin£ Rate /MM Btu/hr)
~ ,..,.._, c..~ 1<"11'\
•
!Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
PUE
1'. "'~ 't\.'t\l P. t'. \ \..,, n..
TSP PM!O voe S02 NOx
Primarv Control Efficiencv ("/,) "\ °' :'-i' )
Primarv Caorure Ef!iciencv (%)
Secondarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Caoture Ef!icienr.v (%)
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach cslculations and documentation of emission factors PUE
Monoxide
Lead
OTilER REGULATED POI.LUTANTS CA5NUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
I Ozone
Perchloroethylene
10028-15-6
127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
.. ,...i,_i,_i, __ LIST __ ro_u_ur_ANT __ s_._u_sc_"_A_d_di-tio_n_al_P_o_llu_ta_•_ts_" _ro_nn_if_•_= __ rv __ i,_i,_i,-+---------+------,.-----11
I
I (ATTACH SUPPORTING uC::UMENTATION/C.".L::ULATIONS)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# 'v M \ "I-2
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY1996 Emissions
GAD
Weeks/ ear:
Annual Throul!h ut • 0 Mar.-Mav:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE ""'
T·--ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa•e Max. Firin• Rate rMM Btu/hr)
D-~-r +-o \--;;::;e... r-P.~ Rll R_IJ F 0 c ,..,,..,·1 <<io"
•
ArmuaJ Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
P\/E
" Control Device: .u.. 2:, l'>. Ii:~ C:: --ho .. ---Seconrlnrv Control: TSP PMIO voe S02 NOx
Primarv Control Ef!icicncv (% l '--\"\ . '-M
Prim•~ Canture Eflicien~ f% \
Secon~•"-' Control Efliciencv (%)
Secondarv C·-ture Efficiencv 1%)
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation or emission factors PUE ,.,1----~==.:...==--
PM10 < icrons
I
CO Carb
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER ACTIJALLBS/YR
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
I
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
.(l .(l .(l LIST POllUT ANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" fonn if n=sarv -ll -ll l.l
'-IL-----~-----+-----l
D
I
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID#¥ M 3 C\-L/
..
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissioll/i Inventory -CY1996 Emissions
IF _____ .,:FIR~::,ST.:..i;:;;:;::;.;;;:i;,~:;::,.;;;~,;::;~~i;:;;;;;.;;::~~~~~~:.:::,:;;,,:;~~~
~
~
~
:
.
.
,
.
-
.
,
.
.
.
-
-
-
=
=
o
:
"
"
"
"
"
;
;
;
:
;
:
:
;
;
:
'
;
,
,

I
I · Houn-
crccntaRc Annual Throullh ut-
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
T~ ofFuel Used %Ash
D-~r-+-o -\-'hE!.,
GAD
PUI
% Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa"" Max. Firinu Rate /MM Btu/hr)
r-F>.<:.. P-.110 Lii=O t ,-,-;, "-c ; 0 f"\ .
I
I
I
g
,. -' Process Rate rmclude units\: !Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
, • Control Device: ~-, "Kt>.'; \=---1=:-,.r-
Secondm, Control: -TSP PMlO VOC
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%) C\ C\ .C\ '-'I
Prim•rv Canture Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Control Efficien~ /%)
Secondarv Cantore Efficiencv ('II,)
ge EMlSSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
CRITERIA POllUTANTS
I
I
I
CO Carbon Monoxide
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POU.UTANTS CAS NUMBER
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10026-15-6
Perchloroelhylene 127184
PUE
S02 NOx
PUE
ACTUAL LBS/YR
Phosphine 7803-51-2
~ l-.()=.()-".()-~UST=.!..!:PO~ll"-UT~ANT~;_,S~-:..!•!:esc~•A~d~di~ti!!!onal=P'-'o~liutan
=
!
!
:
t
s
e
.
.
"
.
.
e
f
o
e
,
_
r
m
=
i
f
'
-
!
n
!
!
:
.
.
,
.
'
:
!
c
:
s
s
a
=
'
-
'
r
v
-
_
;
.
(
)
~
.
(
)
=
.
(
)
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1

1·
I "TTAr.H SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# 1) M.;. 5
L Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissioni; Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
• FIRST · · n Source form for each emissions unit. CAD1PV1
I
IE'.'"""~--------=---'=--====""=,~~e;=-=r==--~i======o.=n=.cl!=4=1='¥~==o~SI.§='F
f
f
"
=
=
:
~
~
-
=
"
=
;
i

¥... ¢" ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
GAO
Hours/ da .
Annual ThroulUl ut •
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RATE ""'
Tvne of Fuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa.., Max. Firini: Rate fMM Bru/hrl
Un~~ r +o -\-'ne., r~P-<::. \:l..11 o IJ F 0 'Erl"'l°ic:.<io" .
Annual Process Rate (include units): !Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PUE
Control Device: -\I;, \ ~ t>..'\= 'n-,-,,\-,0 ,,c-o
SecondJ!rv Control: -TSP PM!O voe S02 :1 NOx
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%) I.-\'-\ :-\ '-! I
Primmv Capture Efficiencv 1%) 'I
Secondarv Control Efficiencv (%)
,,
Secoodarv Capture Efficiencv (%) I
.. i"E .. MISSJ_..._o_N_s._s_u_.M.._MA==R_.Y._F .. O_.R==Tifi===S_.S,.,O=UR==CE='=•tta=c=h=ca-l.,cu,.,la.,11.,.·o._o,_,a.,.n._d_.d._o,.
,
c
u
=
m
=
•
=
•
=
t
•
,
.
t
i
_
.
0
0
.
,
0
.
,
r
,
.
e
m
=
'
i
s
s
=
i
=
•
n
=
f
=
•
=
c
t
=
o
r
s
=
=
-
,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
=
"
"
"
-
-
-
,

CRITERIA POUUTANTS
I
D
0
I
I
I
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POUUTANTS CASNUMBER
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
LIST POUUTANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" form if nccessarv
rnTTM:H SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
.o 1135
ACTUAL LBS/YR
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# '? L l -~
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
"""""
SION SOURCE DESCRlPTION: ~
GAD
Da / week: Weeks/ Hours/ vear.
Dec. -Feb.: 25 ✓,;° Mar. -Mav: 25
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
PU1
Tvne ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usaoe Max. Firin• Rate fLIM Btu/hr)
c ~f:'<>.-r-+o \-\.-..o G-F\C:: f:l.. U R.N'I=" 11... E= ',",... ·,o~c .
Annual Process Rate (include units): IMax. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PUE
nrim•= Control Device: '\) I\ ;--..t_.o ::I±.·.:: 1-"2...
Seconruirv Control: TSP PM!O voe S02 NOx
Primarv CoJtrol Efficien~ !%) C\9 ;--\' 1
Primarv Canrure Efficien~• (%)
Secondarv Control Efficiencv /%)
Secondary Canrure Efficiencv I"/,)
' EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors PUE
,.ll---------!.T::S,:.P====e"-n"'d"'ed,,_,_P,.,artie,·c"'u~l•"'tee1... _____ _;__
PM10 Matter <10 microns
ACTUAL TONS/YR
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POU.UTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
Ozone
Perchloroethylene
Phosphine
{l-!Hl LIST POU.UTANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" form if necessarv <l <l <l
OIi I
CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
.. 1------------l-----+---------1
I
I
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# C..CS I -7
L Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY1996 Emissions
.. r-----•FIR=ST===.;;;;i~==fo=nn.~=tb;;;en==co~m~~=§=~=~=~===~;;;iss=io;;;ns;;.u;;;n.;i;;.l
_____ =.;""°""'=91
L NFS
I
I
I
I
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
Hours/ da .
Annual Throu h ut ·
FUEL USAGFJPROCESS RATE
T..,,... ofFuel Used %Ash
\2. I!-~ Q., i--\-o \-hP
PIA
% Sulfur Annual Fuel Usaoe Max. Firina Rate fMM BtU/hr)
(yf\<:; P--U ~ /J'F ll EfY"'I ·, < c '10n" .
· Process Rate (Include units): I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
I
I
I
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
, Control Device: \I... ~t)C:.,0 = s L\ 5
SecondarvControl: Z tl\.\S-t C' t'I \\e.c;h:ia..c; . -
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%) '-\ C\ . '--\ ~
Primarv Caoture Efficiencv (%)
Seconn•n1 Control Efficiencv ("/2) 0,. ~ , Clo,'· 7
Secondarv Capture Efficiencv (%)
~ 7. 10. '?... 9 \\
TSP-PMIO voc
..
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR TlflS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
~~~~==
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLlITANTS CASNUMBER
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647--01--0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75--09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
LIST POLLUTANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" fonn if nccessarv
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
PUE
S02 NOx
PUE
ACTIJAL LBS/YR
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# J L Y -
L Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CYl996 Emissions
.. lr"" _____ .;.FIRST====~.;..;~~F¥.~~~==~=·;;;;;· ~•.,So~•.;n:,;;•;.:l:;;,onn=i=•;.r;;;••;,;;c;;,h;;;•m=iss;;;;;;;i•;;;ns;;.;;u;;;ni=t==---=.,;°"""'=;,;;;,,
GAO
Da / week: Weeks/ vcar. A.
Dec. -Feb.: Mar.• Ma.
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
PU>
Tvoe ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel U= Max. Firin2 Rate /MM Btu/hr)
\2 ~~<LI' -\-o \-hP G-f\<. P., U lltJ E U... 'E.m •, --..c:.·1on, .
.
I
I
I
I
I
Annual Process Rate (mclude units): I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
I
I
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
, Control Device: \l.. l\t'>C:...O ~ I'---\ y
Secondarv Control: -
Prim•rv Control Efficiencv (%) °' 9. ,'-\. )
Primarv Caoture Efliciencv (%)
Sccondarv Control Ef!icien= (%)
Sccondarv Capture Ef!iciencv (%)
PUE
TSP PMIO voe S02 NOx
.
ft ,.E=MJSSl==O;;,;N .. S_,SUM==MA=R~Y;.;.F,;;;O.;;R;.;TIIl=;;;S.;;S.;;O;.UR=CE===•=tta=c=h=ca=l=cu=l=•ti=·•=n=•=•n=d;.:d;;oc
;
;
a
u
m
=
•
=
•
=
•
•
,
.
t
i
=
o
n
=
=
o
f
,
.
.
e
m
'
=
i
s
s
=
i
=
•
n
=
=
f
•
=
c
t
=
•
=
r
s
"
'
\
=
,
.
.
.
=
=
=
-
-
-
=
=
"
"
-
=
•
=
;
i

I
I
I
I
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
I Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
I Ozone
Perchloroethylene
Phosphine
CASNUMBER
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
..
{HI~ LIST POLLUTANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" fonn if neeessarv '--------+-----
I
I (ATTACH SUPPORT1rJ(; DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# PL 5
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY 1996 Emissions
""""'
Hour of
tember-Nov.:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RATE ""'
T~ of Fuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa~e Max. Firin~ Rate tMM Btu/hr)'
D~~e.r-..\-" l=n 0 G-f\< --n.., 'a..\ e,.(2_ t..{Y") I 55 IO f'J•"
•
Annual Process Rate (include tmits\: iMax. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
nrim•-• Control Device: 'D A 1'.C./'' ·~ \"l
Seconcforv Control: TSP PMIO voe S02 NOx
Prim•~• Control Ef!ici=~ (%\ O"\. C\" I
Prim•rv Cantore Ef!iciencv (% \
SeconAorv Control Ef!icien~• 1%\
SeconAon, C•nture Efficiencv /0/,)
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
Lead ~ oao
OTIIERREGULATEDPOLLUTANTS CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
LIST POLLUTANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" form ifnecessarv
._,.____ ___ _,_____,______
I
I
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# Co$ 2(-
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY1996 Emissions
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
tin Hours -Hours / dav:
Annual Throu ut -
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
PU1
Tvoe ofFucl Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa.,. Max. Fiiin2 Rate rMM Btu/hr)
'le ~~Q.,I' -\-o thP G-A.<. P-.UR.tJFL E/Y"\ ·, c;c:_'1ons: .
Annual Process Rate (mclude unilS): I Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PUE
. , Control Device: \./..1\t)(:_,0 :tl:. \ ....,
Secondary Control: . -TSP PMIO voe S02 NOx
Primarv CoJtrol Ef!iciencv (%) <..:\l\ ."'A
Primarv Caoture Efficiencv (%)
Secondary Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Caorure Efficiencv (%)
..
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR TlflS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
CRITERIA POU.UTANTS .
PUE
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lead
OTIIER REGULATED POU.UTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
Ozone
Perchloroethylene
Phosphine
CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
.. t-1>-l>-l>--LIST--PO-U._UT_ANTS __ ·_•_sc_"_A_dd-in_·o_nal_P_o_llu_tan_ts_" _fo_rm_if_n_= ____ l>_l>_l>-+--------+----------11
I
I (ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID#~ R,D t -\
..
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY 1996 Emissions
ir---~~~~~~~~~~--,..,-,~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
SOURCEDESC
ASSOCIATED WIDI
FUEL USAGl!JPROCESS RA TE ""' '
T•-ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa-Max. Firino Rate /MM Btu/hr)
"-hN~ .
· ·-' Process Rate r mcludc units): /Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE IN
PUE
Secondary Control: PM!O voe S02 NOx
Seco
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR TIIlS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors PUE
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
.. .().().() LIST POLLUTANTS -use "Additional Pollumnts" fonn if ncccssarv .().().()
I '1----------1------f------ll
I (ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# (, V-1
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RATE ""'
Tvn,, ofFucl Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa~c Max. Firin~ Rate /MM Btu/hr\
\\_ \ 0 )v \-•
' . 'Process Rate (mclude units): !Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PU£
. Control Device: C·,.... _. .\:-11. ·, -' ~ -~ ; \ .\.,,, 0
Sccondarv Control: V TSP PMIO voe S02 NOx
Primary Control Efficicn~ (%) I...\ '-\ ,'-\' I
Prima,v Capture Efficicncv (%)
Secondarv Control Efficicncv (%)
Secondarv Capture Efficicncv (%)
.. i'E.,MISSl __ o_N_S._S_U_.M._.,MA==R,_Y...,F=O=R .. TIOS_...,,.s .. o..,UR._.C._E"""=a-=tt=•c=h=c=•l=cu.,,l=•t1=·•=n=s=••=-d=d=•=cum==c=n=taij,t
i
o
=
·
.. •.,• .. fc,.m=iss=-i•.,.n,.ra.,.ct_.o.,rs..._=;=-=-----PUE .... .,,
.--CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
LIST POLL UT ANTS • use • Additional Pollumnts" form if n«:esS>rV
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
,ooo
ACTUAL LBS/YR
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# C, V-7
..
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
li""' ______ F1R,...ST_. • ..._==-=-'i=--=-====r==="=-""9====="·===9'====;;.;.;;.;.;,;;a;;.==-=====;,.,...=.,,--=,,=_,,==si
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
T""" ofFucl Used %Ash % Sulfur
No~ 1-
Weeks / vcar.
"'Mar. -Mav:2.
Annual Fuel Usaue
•
rt Hour of roccss: ·
tcmbcr-Nov.: 2
""'
Max. Firini,: Rate /MM Btu/hr)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·' Process Rate (mclude units): I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
Control Device: (·"' c-\-11. ·1 ,..\ r,.~ -1/;\ho
Secondarv Control: V TSP PM!O voe
Primarv Control Efficicncv (%) v\ '\ "\ \
Primarv Capture Ef!iciencv (%)
Secondarv Control Efficiencv ("lo)
Secondarv Caoture Efficicncv ("lo)
,. EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation or emission factors
CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
I
TSP otal Sus ended Particulate
PM10 atter <10 microns
I
I
I
I
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
I Methylene Chloride
Ozone
Perchloroethylene
CASNUMBER
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-<l
75-09-2
10028-15-<l
127184
7803-51-2
PUE
S02 NOx
PUE
ACTUAL LBS/YR
..
Phosphine
t"-"-"-.. LIST=::..PO=LL=UT=ANT="'S:..:•_,u::,:sc::..".::.A:,:d:::;di::::tional='-'P'-'o"'ll.::;utan=ts::.."__,fo:::rm=if'-'n:::"':::es="''-'rv __ 0:;..::.0..::0+--------+----------f
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID#y'&) -i\
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY1996 Emissions
""""'"'
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
· Hours -Hours / da . / week: Weeks / vear.
cn:cnlalze Annual Thmu h ut -•2..SO Dec. -Feb.: ,!) Mu. -Mav:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE ""'
I
I
I
I
I
I
Tvoe ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usam, Max. Firin2 Rate /MM Btu/hr)
'No t-JE. .
· Process Rate (Include units): J Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMA TJON
Control Device: \C \e.,x -\l... \ QR._,-r,.. Y"lr 5::,.'rv1 u c:.. ~ -A
Secondary Control: TSP PM!O voe,
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%) q q ,0., '1
Primarv Caoture Efficiencv (%)
Secondanr Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Capture Efficiencv (%)
.. EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR TJnS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
• ~ CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lead
OTI:IER REGULA'lED POLLUTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
Ozone
Perchloroethylene
Phosphine
I -0--0--0-LlSTPOllUTANTS-use "Additional Pollutants" form ifnecessarv -0--0--0-
CASNUMBER
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
P\/E
S02 NOx
P\/E
____________
I
I {ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
,•
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID#t?BQ -B
..
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY 1996 Emissions
FIRST · · each emissions unit ~ r-----........................... ~~~~~=;:<=---=-===¥"='=¥=='-i..-======-====~=--=-'==;i
I
OPERATIONAL INFORMA TJON
/ week: Wc,;ks /
.--,,::_o -,·r::.
Dec. • Feb.: ,t..::;J " Mar. -Mav: ,t_.::J
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RATE
T""" ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa"" Max. Firin~ Rate /MM Btu/hrl
't--b t0 E. •
I
I
I
I
I
I
• ---• Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hour Iv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMA TJON
Control Device: ~ \e,x -\l...\Q.R..,"' hr r-.1--,, ,c. ~ -R
Secondarv Control: TSP PMIO voe
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%) YC\ .'1,
. Primarv Capture Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Control Efficiencv ('%)
Secondarv Capture Efficiencv· (%)
.. EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR TIIlS SOURCE attach calculations and documenllltion of emission factors
I
I
I
CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
II Methylene Chloride
I Ozone
Perchloroethylene
CASNUMBER
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
PUE
S02 NOx
PUE
ACTUAL LBS/YR
'
I _ Phosphine
... t-<>_<>_<>_~LIST=~PO=LL=UT=ANTS==-•-=uc:;;scc."..:.A:::d=:dic:,tional=:..:P'-'o"'ll"'uta=•~ts'-•~fo"'rm"'-
'
i
f
:
.
.
:
n
=
~
'
=
"
'
-
r
v
__ <>~<>--'-<>+---------+----------1
g
I
I .. EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID#1)t)() -(
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY 1996 Emissions
------.!FIR~ST::.!.!g::le;:ase~c;::og;v~bg,:l:a\!!.:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:!:.:~~--
-
=
-
~
"
"
°
"
'
"
'
=9 I N SOURCE DESCRil'TION: -p L
I
I
B
I
HouTS / dav: Davs / week: Weeks/ vear.
21:,0 Dec. -Feb.: 't!> MM. • Mav: tember• Nov.:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
PIJ1
Tvne ofFucl Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa-Max. firing Rate ruu Btu/hr)
~--t--)E_ .
.
Process Rate (mclude llllits): !Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMA TJON
PUE
Control Device: ,;:-\e., )( -\l.. \ QR.,...--.. V\r C~/1•1<.Q.., -(',
Sccondarv Control: -TSP PMI0 voe S02 NOx '
Primarv Control Efficiencv f% l '--\ '-1 . '-1 '-1
Primarv Canture Efficiencv (0/4 l
Secondarv Control Efficiencv (01, l
Secondarv Caoture Efficiencv 1%)
0-.,E::,:MISSI;,:.::a~O::,:N:,::S;:,SU~M~MA~R~Y:.,:;F,:;0::;R:_THIS~:;;:.,:S~O;:,:UR~C~E~•::,tt:
,
:
•
;
;
,
:
c
h
_
:
,
;
c
:
;
:
a
:
,
:
:
l
c
;
,
:
:
u
,
:
:
l
•
:
;
:
r
i
~
o
n
:
:
;
:
s
~
•
:
:
,
:
n
:
:
,
d
~
d
~
o
c
u
~
m
~
•
n
:
,
:
:
t
;
:
,
•
t
i
:
,
:
:
·
o
:
:
:
n
:
,
,
:
o
;
;
,
r
~
e
m
~
i
s
~
s
:
:
;
i
o
:
;
:
n
~
f
:
:
,
a
c
;
;
:
t
:
;
:
o
r
s
:
;
:
.
.
_
.
-
______ _;PU;;::E;,;,,,
I
I
I
g
I
I
g
Lead
OTHER REGill.ATED POI.LUf ANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
ozone
Perchloroethylene
Phosphine
l.lST POll.UfANTS . use • Additional Pollutants" form if n=rv
CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION--for Emission Source ID# RV -I
L Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
•r,--=~~~==~~~~'F."'""""""~~
I
I
I
B
ft
I
I
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
Hour,/ da .
Annual Throu h ut -
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
Pin
T""" afFucl Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa"" Max. Firin2 Rate /MM Btu/hr)
NnN~ .
• Process Rate (mclude wlits): !Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
P\JE
, Control Device: '\..l o \ C\ \I n --·""P,\ ~ ....... y-,,o \G ~ ;;\.Loo
' '
Secondarv Control: TSP PMJO voe S02 NOx
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%) ~.C\') .-,-
Primarv Caoture Ef!iciencv (%) / I /
Secondarv Control Efficiencv (%) ,j
Secondarv Caoture Efficiencv (% l
.. l'E,.MISSl====O_.N,.S_,SU.,.;M..,.;MA=R=Y-==F=O=R=TIUS"===S=O=UR
"
'
=
C
E
-
=
"
•
=
t
t
=
•
c
=
h
=
c
a
=
l
=
c
u
=
l
=
•
h
=
·
o
=
n
=
s
=
•
•
.
_
d
_
d
=
o
c
u
m
=
=
=
•
=
n
=
t
•
;
a
t
i
;
;
;
o
n
;
;
.
,
;
a
o
f

.. •=m;;;iss.ai;;;o .. n=f•=ct=•=rsab=_,--=---=-PVE=-.
.-CRITERIA POILUTANTS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POU.UTANTS CASNUMBER
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
LIST POU.UTANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" form if ncccssarv
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# R\/ -2_
L Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Depanment Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CYl996 Emissions
·~~FIR~ST~~~~~~~r=i~=--r3':~
I
I
OPERA TJONAL INFORMATION
Hour.. / dav:
Annual Throu•h ut •
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RATE
Tvoc ofFud Used %Ash
No l0r-
""'
% Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa= Max. Firin~ Rate fMM Btu/hr)
•
. Process Rate (include writs): I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
I
I
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
, Control Device: -~ o , " 'l c, ~,,,+l'I \ .i..:-\ ,a \C
Secondatv Control: TSP
Primarv Control Ef!iciencv (%) C\ ~ ,'-'\ ' I
Primarv Caoture Ef!iciencv (%)
Sccondatv Control Ef!iciencv (%)
Sccondatv Capture Ef!iciencv (%)
" _;\.l..nn
PMIO voe
ge EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
Ozone
Perchloroethylene
CASNUMBER
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
PUE
S02 NOx
PUE
ACTIJAL LBS/YR
I _ Phosphine
... t-l)'-l)'-l)-'----'UST=:..:...POo:cLL=UT=ANTS==·:..,U,::sc::.."..;.A!::d::cdc::iti,conal=Pc.:o::,11::,uta
n
=
t
s
:
:
.
"
.
.
:
~
"
'
o
n
n
=
i
f
e
.
.
:
:
:
"
c
c
:
:
:
c
s
s
a
=
:
:
.
.
r
v
:
.
.
.
_
_
_
:
c
l
)
.
.
:
l
)
c
.
.
.
:
l
)
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
f

I
I
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# \-\[D-S
L. Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY! 996 Emissions
•{mii;-;;N;;~;~;~~~~~~f~&~:J~~;jt~:Et;=tti::rflEsJ~;::s~;;Jct..__.i
.
1

I ASSOCIATED WITH
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
I
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
P\J1
Tvne ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usa"" Max. Firin~ Rate /MM Btu/hr)
NONf-:: . I
n
D
I
I
I •-••1 Pn,cessRat,: (include units): !Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
. Control Device: ( ',-,,-., O ,:, ~ a " 'MF\<' h:::,1 , <a -a.le: -i G,-.. ·'h A(J
Secondary Control: u TSP PMIO voe
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%) QC\ C\ '-1
Primarv Caprure Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Control Eflicieru:v (%)
Secondarv Caoture Efliciencv (%)
..
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR TlilS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
· CRITERIA POUUTANTS
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POUUTANTS CASNUMBER
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
ozone 10026-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
LIST POllUTANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" form if necessarv
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
PUE
S02 NOx
PUE
ACTIJAL LBS/YR
I EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# \J@-N
L Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
• ,-.----FIR~ST::.:,;.~~~~~~~F9~~~~9~~"F"~~~~~~o;='""!'!'-F"':~F'jj
Hours/ dav: Weeks / vear. Hours / vear:
Mar. -Mllv: 1June -Am? .. tcmbcr • Nov.:
FUELUSAGEJPROCESSRATE
PU1
T"""' ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usaee Max. Firimr Rate fMM Btu/hr) .
TioNF-.
'
I
I
I
I
I · Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
Control Device: n,." 'I-"\ ~ .., ~nc ~u-"" ~ ~ -... G, c.., .'--{.._ -:,_ ( ) '
-,
Sccondarv Control: V TSP PMIO voc S02 NOx
Primarv Control Efficienev (%) '-\ 0, ,C\'--\ .
Primarv Canture Efficiencv !% )
Sccondatv Control Efficien= !% ) I Secondarv Canture Efficiencv (%)
.. ,;E:::MISSI==O;;;N.S=SU;;;M~MA~R:.:,Y;..:.F~O;:;R:,.THIS~;;;.;S;.;0;.UR=CE==•;.;.tt.
;
•
;
;
;
c
h
;
.
c
;
;
;
•
.
;
k
.
;
u
;
;
:
l
•
=
t
i
o
;
;
;
n
;
;
;
s
,
;
;
•
,
;
;
.
n
d
;
;
.
;
;
d
o
=
c
u
m
,
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
-
;
•
n
=
t
;
;
,
•
1
1
=
·
0
=
n
~
o
.
f
,
;
;
•
m
=
1
5
=
·

•=io.;n;,;f.;•;;;ct;;;ors:,;;.=.-=------=PU,;.E_,
I
I
I
I
I
Lead
OTiiER REGll.ATED POLLUTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
ozone
Perchloroethylene
CASNUMBER ACTIJALLBSIYR
7782-50-5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2 I Phosphine
... ~<>:::.<>.::..::<>_~LIST,::.!..LPO~ll~UT~ANT~!_:S~-:_!u!'!se~•A~d~d~itio?!onal!!!!!..P
!
:
!
o
~
l
l
~
u
t
a
n
~
t
s
=
-
"
.
.
!
~
!
!
!
o
n
n
!
!
!
!
.
.
!
i
f
~
n
~
c
c
~
c
s
=
e
!
s
a
~
r
v
c
_
_
_
:
c
<
>
~
<
>
~
<
>
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
l

I
I
----····-·•---•..-.---·,,,...,., ,..,,, fl'Tl'"'l\1~,
· ~ ~\..).e.,\ ~-(Y\•,$S 'to _fv -\"c) Cl.. t-0~1~ If/ \c,vv--.:t O.$ "j)Q-2.. (.0 J-) "e.QS1,-\-,a N I v:,\ ~ \-....: S¼ \/ <Z. L ,d..c,: -"'C, E fl D Co a, "1
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# (;..f\S :BUR.t-J F Q.:
L Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY 1996 Emissions
•r-----_,;FIRST=--.===~;=;,-=i'=====i="~-===~~n=So;;,;•~n:=•.;,fo=;nn~fo~r5ea;;;<;;;h~•;;;m=iss=io=ns=-•n=i=L==---~"'°""=~
v. Q. j\..) E
D
D
D
I
I
Process Rate mclude units :
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
Primarv Control Device: \.\ I'\ r· ,.., ..,,-12.6 \ I ~ ..-1.
Secondarv Control:
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Prim= Caoture Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Canture Ef!icicncv (%)
Max. Houri Process Rate:
TSP PMIO voe
.. EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation or emission ractors
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647--01--0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
UST POLLUTANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" fonn ifn=rv
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENT A TION/CALCULA TIO NS)
P\l1
Btu/hr
S02 NOx · I
ACTUAL I.BS/YR
B
I
I
I
g
I
I
g
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# 6'1. LL MI LL
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
FIRST . iL
Weeks/ car. Hours/ ear.
Annual Throu Mar.-Mav: June: -Au .:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
PV1
T•m• ofFucl Used ¾Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usaae Max. Firin~ Rate rMM Btu/hr)
U/\ll S::-•
Annual Process Rate (include units):" IMax. Hourly Process Rate: '
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PUE
Control Device: ~,Jr:
Secondarv Control: TSP PMJO voe S02 NOx
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Primarv Canture Efficiencv (%)
Secon~•~ Control Efficiencv (% l
Secondary Canture Efficiencv (<>lo)
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and do'cumentation of emission factors PUE
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POILUTANTS CASNUMBER ACTUAL LBS/YR
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-$
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
LIST POLLUTANTS-use "Additiona1 Pollutants" form ifnecessarv
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# 'Pas+; N 3
Forsyth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory -CY!996 Emissions
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
Da / week: Weeks/ vcar.
Dec. -Feb.: Mar. -Mav:
FUEL USAGE/PROCESS RA TE
T•~ ofFuel Used ¾Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usaoe Max. Firin• Rate t>.,0.A Btu&r)
•.fl'I •It:' •
IAm1ual Process Rate (include units): I Max. Hourlv Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
nrim.,v Control Device: No ,,r::::
Secon~•ro Control: TSP PMIO voe
Prim•~ Control Efficien~' (%)
Prim•~ Caoture Efficiencv (%)
Secon~•~ Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Caoture Efficiencv (%)
EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation of emission factors
voe
CO Carbon Monoxide
Lead
OTHER REGULATED POLLUTANTS CASNUMBER
Chlorine 7782-50-5
Fluorine 7782-41-4
Hydrazine 302-01-2
Hydrogen Chloride 7647-01-0
Hydrogen Fluoride 7664-39-3
Hydrogen Sulfide 7783-06-4
Methyl Chloroform 71-55-6
Methylene Chloride 75-09-2
Ozone 10028-15-6
Perchloroethylene 127184
Phosphine 7803-51-2
<Hi1> LIST POLLUTANTS -use "Additional Pollutants" fonn if necessarv 1,1} 1,
(ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
PUE
SO2 NOx
PUE
ACTUAL TONS/YR
ACTUAL LBS/YR
I
I
I
D
I
I
D
EMISSION SOURCE INFORMATION for Emission Source ID# toB-COF1+1; IV
For,yth County Environmental Affairs Department Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory-CY1996 Emissions
S ASSOCIATED WITH THIS
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
Annual Throu Mar. -Mav: June • Au2.:
FUEL USAGFJPROCESS RA TE ""'
Tvne ofFuel Used %Ash % Sulfur Annual Fuel Usaoc Max. Firing Rate !MM Bru/hrl
NONF •
. · Process Rate (include units): /Max. Hourly Process Rate:
CONTROL DEVICE INFORMATION
PUE
• Control Device: No)-..:) E
Secondary Control: TSP PM!O voe S02 NOx
Primarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Primarv Caoture Efficienev (%)
Secondarv Control Efficiencv (%)
Secondarv Capture Efficiencv (%)
.EMISSIONS SUMMARY FOR THIS SOURCE attach calculations and documentation or emission factors PUE
g-j CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
I
I
D
H
I
I
Lead
OTHER REGUIATED POllUTANTS
Chlorine
Fluorine
Hydrazine
Hydrogen Chloride
Hydrogen Fluoride
Hydrogen Sulfide
Methyl Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
Ozone
Perchloroethylene
Phosphine
LIST POLLUTANTS -use • Additional Pollumnts" form if nceessarv <) <) <)
CASNUMBER
7782-5().5
7782-41-4
302-01-2
7647-01-0
7664-39-3
7783-06-4
71-55-6
75-09-2
10028-15-6
127184
7803-51-2
B (ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION/CALCULATIONS)
ACTIJAL TONS/YR
ACTUAL LBS/YR
I I
I ~
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
m
I I I r,
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
Memorandum
Date:
To:
From:
Subj.:
January 6, 1998
File
Douglas Moore
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
Air Quality Information
Johnson Controls• Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, NC
US EPA ID: NCD 000 770 487
On Tuesday, January 6, 1998, I spoke with Mr. Robert Russ, Environmental Specialist• Forsyth
County Environmental Affairs Office [phone]. Mr. Russ is the case manager for air quality permits
at the Johnson Controls facility. He stated that Johnson Controls operates air emissions control equipment
under air quality permit #00725R8, issued through Forsyth County Environmental Affairs office, due to
expire on January 31, 1998. They are a "synthetic minor source application" facility which means that
Johnson Controls accepts and places certain restrictions on maintenance and operation of air emission control
equipment, and in turn, avoids being subject to Title V of the Clean Air Act. These restrictions include the
use of Gore-Tex and fabric filters on air emissions control equipment.
The permit controls emission point sources from roughly 30 different point source stacks, for lead
and particulate emissions. The facility is subject to certain concentration standards (such a grains/ dry
standard cubic feet of air) based on the process being controlled, and are promulgated as lead-acid battery
industry wide standards. He said that the company recently upgraded some equipment on its stacks.
He stated that Forsyth Co. Does not conduct emissions testing, but Johnson Controls has paid
contractors to perform stack emission tests. The most recent did not show any violations of industry permit
standards.
Johnson Controls submits an annual emissions inventory to Forsyth Co., that includes estimates for
particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, volatile organic compounds, carbon monoxide, lead, antimony, arsenic,
selenium, sulfuric acid and hydrogen gas.
Forsyth County investigated one complaint from a neighboring business about excessive noise
coming from the Johnson Controls fa~ility. The noise emanated from a loud fan used to transfer lead oxide
powder into the main facility. In the past 3 years, Johnson Controls has had one violation on September 18,
1996 from visible emissions resulting from a failed baghouse filter. The violation was corrected and there
are no_ current violations outstanding against the company,as of January 1998.
Mr. Russ agreed to send copies of the annual emissions inventory and air quality permit to the NC
Superfund Section .
I ..
I
g
n
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
State of North Ca~01ina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
June 26, 1997
Mr. Phil Vorsatz, Chief
NC Site Management Section
U.S. EPA-Waste Management Division
Atlanta Federal Building
6 I Forsyth St., I Ith Floor
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104
Subj: Expanded Site Inspection Sampling Plan
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, N.C.
US EPA ID: NCD 000 770 487
Dear Mr. Vorsatz:
Enclosed please find a ccpy of the proposed ES! sampling plan for the Johnson Controls-
Globe Battery Division site (EPA ID: NCD 000 770 487), tentatively scheduled for late July 1997,
located near the town of Guthrie, about 3 miles east of Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
1.0 Site Conditions and History
The site location is indicated on Figure 1. The site covers one parcel of property totalling
approximately 75 acres. The site is located near the top of a small hill, that slopes to the northwest
towards Lowery Creek and west towards an unnamed tributary to Lowery Creek. Surface runoff
from the main facility is collected in catch basins where it is directed underground through culverts
to three splash pads ut the heads of three sedimentation basins located along the west boundary of
the site. These three basins are designed to collect storm water runoff from the site, allowing
p~rticulates to settle out before being di~charged from a flow-through pipe in the dam to the
unnamed tributary. Pond #I discharges to a small wmamed intennittent tributary that directs runoff
northwest to Lowery Creek. Ponds #2 and #3 disc_harge to a second unnamed intermittent tributary
that directs runoff north to Lowery Creek. The site has never been permitted under the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES).
The plant was constructed in 1978 to manufacture automobile batteries. Batteries are
assembled and charged at the site. In 1984, plant production was estimated at 6,000-11,000 batteries
per day. The facility has expanded it's operations and the plant production is currently estimated at
between 16,000-22,000 batteries per day. Raw materials used in the production of batteries include
pig lead, lead oxide, barium sulphate, carbon black and sulphuric acid.
P.O. Box 27687. Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone 919-733-~996 FAX [phone]W5
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Aciion !:mployer 50% recycled/ l 0% posi-consumer paper
I ..
D
u
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
Letter to Mr. Vorsatz
Johnson Control Sampling Plan
June 26, 1997
Page 2
The facility is currently listed as a RCRA large quantity generator. Wastewaters generated
during the production process are treated with sodium hydroxide, then precipitated with ferrous
sulfate, filtered to remove the large solids, and filter pressed to produce the lead sludge filter cake.
The filter cake and lead contaminated solid wastes are shipped off-site to lead smelters.
Hazardous wastes generated during the operation are stored at the plant in 55 gallnn drums
and 10 mil polyethylene bags. Hazardous wastes generated at the plant consist of pasting conveyer
belts, floor sweeping compounds, fiber and plastic separators, waste paper toweling, wipe cloths,
cheese cloths, work gloves, whole HEP A filters, fabric bag filters, wastewater treatment plant
residue and wet scrubber (rotoclone) sludge. Wastewater treatment plant residue and rotoclone
sludge are removed on a batch basis and stored in a separate container storage area, and subsequently
shipped to a smelter. Disposal practices prior to 1980 are not well documented. The dry waste is
containerized and segregated in a separate waste storage area, prior to shipment to a smelter.
"The facili 1y produced about 122,000 pounds oflead wastewater treatment sludge (D008) and
400 pounds of barium waste (D00S) in 1980, about 31,275 pounds of lead wastewater treatment
sludge (D008), and 2,640 pounds of waste petroleum naphtha (D00 l) in 1988, 63,133 pounds of
lead wastewater treatment sludge (D008) and 3,520 pounds of waste petroleum naphtha (D00 I) in
1989.
There have been several spills at the plant since 1979. In 1979, approximately 3,000 gallons
of sulphuric acid was spilled while a tank was being filled, another 1,000 gallons of lead oxide and
lead sulphate containing wastewaters spilled to one of the three sedimentation basins in 1981, an
unlcJ1own amount of sulphuric acid was spilled in 1982, and an unknown amount was spilled from
a leaking valve in a sulphuric acid transfer line in 1996. One of the three acid spills also reportedly
reached a nearby sedimentation basin.
2.0 Sources
Potential source areas used in evaluating the site are identified in Figille 2. Samples will be
collected from tlrree potential source areas and analyzed for volatile organics compounds µer EPA
mclhod 8240, semi-volatile organics compounds per EPA method 8270, total metals per EPA 7000
series methods and toxicity characteristic leachable metals per EPA method 1311. All source
samples will be collected in accordance with the May 1996 EPA Environmental Investigation!;
Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual. ·
An authoritative san1pling plan was chosen to determine the presence of contaminanls at
potential source areas. Because of the biased nature of the sampling design, the degree of
representativeness is difficult to estimate. Therefore, the quality assurance samples for this section
of the sampling plan will be confined to collecting split samples to determine the sample handling
I
lie
g
I
B
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
Letter to Mr. Vorsatz
Johnson Control Sampling Plan
June 26, 1997 .
Page 3
variability. Several additional sets of sampling jars and equipment will be carried into the field to
collect supplementary source samples, if needed based on visual observation 0f stained soils, stressed
vegetation, or as deemed necessary by the project manager.
The primary contaminant associated with site activities is lead, which exhibits a limited
mobility, is easily adsorbed to clay-rich soils, and is also likely to have been deposited by fugitive
air emissions. For this reason, the source samples will be collected from the top 3 inches of soils at
the site. Since fugitive emissions could influence background soil lead concentrations, a
background soil sample and split background soil sample will be chosen in the field from soils that
are geologically similar and unlikely to have been affected by emissions from the site.
2.1 Acid Storage Tank Area
A, noted previously, at least three spills of sulphuric acid have been reported at the a<:id
storage tank area. According to plant personnel, the most recent spill occurred in 1996 and was :iot
remediated due to the relatively small scale. A composite surface soil sample (JC-SS-02) collected
near the acid storage tank area in 1992 exhibited elevated levels of arsenic and calcium, relative to
the background soil sample (JC-SS-01 ). A soil boring, advanced to 11 feet below grade near the acid
storage area (JC-SB-02) in I 992, also exhibited elevated concentrations of arsenic and calcium,
relative to the background soil boring (JC-SB-01). No analyses for sulfates were requested at that
time.
The NC Superfund Section proposes to collect 4 surface soil grab samples in the vicinity of
the acid storage tank source area to determine an areal extent of soil contamination. Becau~e
concentrated sulfuric acid can leach metals from native soil potentially affecting groundwater, soil
pH and total sulfate analyses will be requested for this set of soil samples in addition to the total
metals and TCLP analyses.
For attribution purposes, a soil grab s;,mple will be collected from the bottom of a catch basin
that receives overland runoff from this area of the site, located immediately north of the acid storage
tank area. Overland runoff is directed north underneath the main facility to a splash pad where it
discharges to surface soils. Another surface soil grab sample will be collected below this splash pad
north of the main facility. The soil samples will be analyzed for the same parameters as described
above .
I
lie
•
g
D
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
Letter to Mr. Vorsatz
Johnson Control Sampling Plan
June 26, 1997
Page4
2.2 Lead Oxide Unloading Dock
Lead oxide is reportedly unloaded fror;, train cars at the east side of the main facility. No
samples have been collected in the vicinity of the lead oxide unload point.
We propose to collect a couple of soil grab samples from any areas of exposed soil along the
rail line near the lead oxide unload point. Source sample locations will be selected based on visual
observation of contamination or devegetated areas, if present. Source dimensions will be based upon
the lab results, should any elevated concentrations be found iD the soil samples.
The following metals are reportedly present in lead alloys used in automotive batteries-
antimony, arsenic, barium, calcium, selenium, silver, strontium, tellurium and zinc. Because the
industry typically reuses scrap lead from older batteries, the presence of numerous metal impurities
may be encountered in lead oxide. For this reason, the Sur,erfund Section will request that the soil
samples from the lead oxide unloading dock are tested for the abov: mentioned metals in addition
to total lead and TCLP analyses .
2.3 Drum Storage Area
In a May 1991 reconnaissance, Green.home and O'Mara, Inc. noted that materials such as
plastic battery cases, aluminum flake paste, battery termin8.ls, 55-gallon drums of petroleum-based
lubricants and broken battery parts were stored at the southeast comer of the site A composite soil
sample collected near a loading dock/drum storage area (JC-SS-03) exhibited elevated levels of
calcium and lead.
We propose to collect a couple of surface soil grab samples at the southeast comer of the site
in the vicinity of the former drum storage area. Since battery parrts were reportedly stored in this
area, the Superfund Section will also request that the soil samples be tested for the same parameters
as identified in the lead oxide soil samples from section 2.2. The source dimensions will be based
on visual observation of contamination, or devegetated areas, if present.
3.0 Targets
The primary targets associated with the site are two wetland areas located from 900-1500 feet
downstream of the sedimentation basins, along two perennial streams that direct site drainage to
Lowery Creek. Both wetland areas have been confirmed by John Thomas, wetlands specialist with
the Army Corps of Engineers. Their locations are designated on map 2. Both wetlands extend
downstream to the confluence with Lowery Creek. Thus, the probable points of entry of site runoff
to surface water are located at the beginning of each wetland.
I ..
I
I
I
g
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
Letter to Mr. Vorsatz
Johnson Control Sampling Plan
June 26, 1997
Page 5
Lowery Creek also has wetlands extending downstream from the confluences of both
perennial streams to the headwaters of Salem Lake. According to Cary Bostic, District 7 Wildlife
Enforcement Officer, Salem Lake is regularly fished by boat. No fishing could be established in
Lowery Creek. The nearest location where people fish from the bank is located at the Old
Greensboro Road bridge over Salem Lake, approximately 1.0 mile downstream of PPE. The city
of Winston-Salem operates a surface water intake on Salem Lake that serves 20-30% of the water
supply for Forsyth County. The Salem Lake intake is located at the dam, approximately 2.1 miles
downstream of the site.
The nearest drinking water well is located at the Pettycord residence, 302 Walkerton-Guthrie
Road, approximately 0.25 mile northeast of the facility.
3.1 Surface Water Pathway Sampling Design
During the May 1997 onsite reconnaissance, three sedimentation basins were observed that ,,
retain runoff along the west boundary of the site. The basins are part of a pem1itted storm water
management plan for the facility. The discharge from the basins enters two tributaries where it is
then directed to Lowery Creek. Since the basins had recently been dredged and rebuilt, the sampling
design incorporates collection of soil samples prior to and following discharge of runoff at each
basin.
The surface water sampling plan design consists of collecting numerous surface water and
sediment samples from the unnamed tributaries leading from the site to Lowery Creek, from Lowery
Creek and from Salem Lake, to determine if contamination could.be identified in surface water or
sediments from each of the primary targets. In order to accomplish this, numerous surface water and
sediment control samples were added to the sampling plan as a quality control measure to evaluate
whether any alternate sources may be discharging to Lowery Creek between the site and the nearest
fishery. All surface water sample locations will be recorded by Global Positioning System (OPS)
and recorded in the log book designated for this particular investigation.
Duplicate surface water and sediment samples will be collected from either surface water or
sediment locations considered critical to the HRS score for the site to confirm the presence of any
contaminants that may be detected in any of these samples. In addition, a double volume of surface
water samples will be collected from the background location on Lowery Creek to be used as the
matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate sample by the contract laboratory. In addition, a field blank
and a post-preservative blank will be collected to evaluate the potential for cross contamination .
There are several mixing zones between the site and the nearest fishery. Where possible,
sample locations from mixing zones will be chosen to collect a well-mixed representative sample.
The san1pler will record pH, temperature, conductivity and turbidity readings of each sample point
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
Letter to Mr. Vorsatz
Johnson Control Sampling Plan
June 26, 1997
Page 6
in a log book designated for this particular investigation.
Since the site contaminants consist primarily of metals which are known to easily sorb to
organic sediments, sediment samples will be collected from fine, silty, dark-colored sediments
containing relatively high organic contents. The sampler will record the physical characteristics of
each sediment sample (color, sheen, odor, etc ... ) in a log book designated for this particular
investigation.
Since surface water from Salem Lake may contain a naturally higher turbidity than surface
water from Lowery Creek, a background surface water and sediment sample will be collected from
the south wing of Salem Lake at the Old Greensboro Road bridge.
A surface water sample will be collected from the drinking water intake on Salem Lake to
address any potential public health concerns. No sediment sample will be collected at this location.
The sample descriptions and locations are outlined in Table 1 and depicted in figures I and
2. Additional soil samples may be collected, if stained or devegetated soils are encountered, or if
areas designated for composites are too large for one sample. If you have any questions regarding
this proposed sampling plan, please contact me at [phone], ext. 315.
Attachments
:cc_:~~i~File'i'i
Sincerely,
Douglas Moore
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
APPROVED:. _____________ _
Phil Vorsatz, Chief Date
NCSite Management Section
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
g
g
g
..
I
I
Sample Id#
JC-001-SL·
JC-101-SL
JC-002-SL
JC-003-SL
JC-004-SL
JC-005-SL
JC-006-SL
JC-007-SL
JC-008-SL
JC-009-SL
JC-010-SL
JC-011-SL
JC-012-SL
JC-013-SL
JC-014-SL
(
Table 1: Sample Locations and Descriptions
Expanded Site Inspection
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
NCD 000 770 487
Location Justification Sample Matrix
NW of facility Background -GrabSoil
NW of facility Split Backgroundto Grab Soil
test sample
handling variability
Acid Storage Tank Potential Source and Grab Soil
establish dimensions
Acid Storage Tank Potential Source and Grab Soil
establish dimensions
Acid Storage Tank Potential Source and Grab Soil
establish dimensions
Acid Storage Tank Potential Source and Grab Soil
establish dimensions
Lead Oxide Potential Source Grab Soil
Unloading Dock
Lead Oxide Potential Source Grab Soil
Unloading Dock
Drum Storage Area Potential Source Grab Soil
Drum Storage Area Potential Source Grab Soil
-
Catch Basin near Attribution Grab Soil
Acid Storage Tank
Below Splash Pad at Attribution and Grab Soil
north end of facility Potential Source
Below Splash Pad Attribution and Grab Soil
above Basin 3 Potential Source
Below Splash Pad Attributioin and Grab Soil
above Basin 2 Potential Source
Below Splash Pad Attribution and Grab Soil
above Basin I Potential Source
Analyses
V,S,I, including
TCLP metals.
V,S,I including
TCLP metals.
V,S,I, including
TCLP metals.
V,S,I, including
TCLP metals.
V,S,l, !ncluding
TCLP metals.
V,S,I, including
TCLP metals.
V,S,I including
TCLP metals.
V,S,I including
TCLP metals
V,S,I including
TCLP metals
V,S,I including
TCLP metals
V,S,I
V,S,I
V,S,I
V,S,I
V,S,I
I ..
B
D
D
n
n
D
D
rf'
n
g
I
I
I
JC-001-SW/SD
J C-002-SW /SD
J C-003-SW /SD
JC-004-SW/SD
JC-005-SW/SD ·
JC-006-SW/SD.
JC-106-SW
JC-007-SW/SD.
JC-107-SW
JC-008-SW/SD
J C-009-SW /SD
JC-010-SW/SD
JC-0ll-SW/SD
UT above confluenc
of drainage from
Basin 1
Below Spillway of
Basin 3
Below Spillway of
Basin 2
Below Spillway of
Basin 1
From small leachate
stream of unnamed
tributary of Basin 1
From 300 feet below
wetland headwater
on unnamed trib. of
Basin 1
Same as JC-006-SW
From 300 feet below
wetland headwater
on unnamed trib. of
Basins 2 & 3.
Same as JC-007-SW
From Lowery Creek
above the confluence
withunnamed trib. of
Basins 2 & 3
From Lowery Creek
below confluence
with unnamed trib.
ofBasins 2 & 3
From unnamed trib.
discahrging to
Lowery Creek, about
500 feet below
confluence with
Basin 2/3 trib.
From unnamed trib.
discharging to
Lowery Creek, about
1000 feet below
confluence with
Basin 2/3 trib.
Background Aqueous V,S,I
Sediment
Establish release for Aqueous V,S,l
attribution Sediment
Establish release for Aqueous V,S,I
attribution Sediment
Establish release for Aqueous V,S,l
attribution Sediment
Establish release Aqueous V,S,I
from GW discharge Sediment
for attribution
Establish release Aqueous V,S,I
impacting nearest Sediment
SW target
QA/QC Aqueous Aqueous V,S,l
Duplicate Sedimen!
Establish relecse Aqueous V,S,I
impacting nearest Sediment
SW target.
QA/QC Aqueous Aqueous V,S,I
Duplicate Sediment
Background Aqueous V,S,I
(Double Volumes for Sediment
MS/MSD)
Split of sediment to
test sample handling
variability.
Establish release Aqueous V,S,I
from unnamed trib. Sediment
of Basins 2&3 to
Lowery Creek
Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
Sediment
Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
Sediment
I
I
I
a
0
n
B
g
I
I
I
JC-012-SW/SD
JC-013-SW/SD
JC-014-SW/SD
JC-015-SW/SD
JC-016-SW/SD ·
JC-017-SW/SD .·
JC-018-SW/SD
JC-019-SD
JC-020-SW
From Lowery Creek
below confluence
with unnamed trib of
Basin 1
From unnamed trib.
discharging to North
side of Lowery
Creek, about 200
feet below
confluence with
Basin I trib.
From unnamed trib.
discharging to South
side of Lowery
Creek, about I 000
feet below
confluence with
Basin I trib.
From unnamed trib.
discharging to North
side of Lowery
Creek, about 1300
feet below
confluence with
Basin I trib.
From unnamed trib.
discharging to North
side of Salem Lake,
about 3000 feet
below confluence
with Basin I trib.
From unnamed trib.
discharging to South
side of Salem Lake,
about 3500 feet
below confluence
with Basin I trib.
From North side of
Old Greensboro
Road bridge over
Salem Lake.
Same as JC-0 I 8-SD
From Salem Lake
DW raw water
intake
Establish release Aqueous V,S,I
from unnamed trib. Sediment
of Basin I to Lowery
Creek·
Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
Sediment
Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
Sediment
Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
Sediment
Control Sample Aqueous V,S,I
Sediment
Control Sample Aqlleous V,S,I
Sediment
Establish release Aqueous V,S,I
impacting nearest Sediment
fishery and
additional wetland
frontage
QA/QC Sediment Aqueous V,S,I
Duplicat~ to test Sediment
spatial variability
Public Health Aqueous V,S,l
Concern Sediment
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
JC-021-SW/SD South wing of Salem
Lake @Greensboro
Rd bridge
JC-001-PW Pettycord DW well
302 Walkerton-
Guthrie Road
JC-002-PW Drinking Water Well
(To be determined)
JC-001-TB Field Blank
JC-002-PB Post -Preservative
Blank
Sample Totals:
Aqueous:
(I) voe (40 ml x 2)
(2) BNA (2 Liter Amber)
(3) Metals (I Liter HDPE)
.iL
25
25
25
Background for Aqueouis
JC-018-SW/SD thru Sediment
JC-020-SW/SD
.
Public Health Aqueous
Concern
Background Aqueous
QA/QC Aqueous
QA/QC Aqueous
Sediment/Soil:
(I) VOe (125 ml-Septa Lid)
(2) BNA (I 25 ml)
(3) Metals (125 ml)
V,S,I
V,S,I
V,S,l
V
1
.iL
35
35
35
/f~~
(
lt:.
' ~! . : { .. _·.,
. -·~ ~ {7 •
,Cl .
~-
\'-' •' f c,
'·
-. .-.,. -. ' ' ..
-:~= . -, :.•:~::: ~
:,: ',
~ ... ,.~ '
~~~~~,;;;;; JC-010-SW/S
."::~_2~ t
•;:
17.>r\.'C
JC-012-•.i~:~ ,;'
·,~ -,-<;;\
~-! '\
Site Location and Surface Wat p 1 '.~
Johnson Controls Expa d d s·er athway Sample Points ·-·1
Winston S I F n e ite lnspect1on (ES!) i•
. a em, orsyth County, NC i,
US EPA ID: NCD 000 770 487 _,
Scale: I: 15840 /Soil Su v N
r ey of Forsyth County, NC) Pa
~ Site Bow1daries
Sample Points •
Nearest Fishery
Nearest Wetland
rinki-ter 1.-
. e •, .,~o..q'~ 1{' )/4ft:i~t~{:-'•-Vf: ';,(}_~
/
:1 , C • I -!.:: r n ::, '" z " ~ ' G ~ T, 'J, .. [j 0 0 r ,. "' z ,. ,i; 0 I "' ~-r ::, 0 0 ,, ~:, t ~ •~, " TI ), n '" n 0 z ~ 0 C " ti> r z m ( Figure 2. On-Site Sample Locations Johnson Controls Expanded Site Inspection (ES!) Winston Salem, Forsyth County, NC US EPA ID: NCD 000 770 487 Map Not to Scale -1/..-Site Boundaries ~ Wetland Boundary (Approximate) 'Ill ~y-N
NORTH
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I SUPERFUND !P=f04-562-8788 JUL 09'97
United Staf , Environmental Protection Agf(''y
Region IV
10:03 No.007
=a: 'if!bl. &EPA 61 Forsyth Street
Atlanta, GA 30303
FacSimile Coyer Sheet
FAX No: 919-733-4811
. From: Jennifer Wendel-U.S. EPA
Office phone: ( 404)-562-8799
FAX: [phone]
Date: July 9, 1997
MESSAGE: Johnson Controls, ESI Sampling plan approval
Office code: 11th fl
Number of pages,
including cover:
RECEIVED
,l\JL O 9 1997
51.!llE.RFUNO SECTION
P.01
NORTH SUPERFUND I ID:404-562-8788 10:04 No.007 P.02
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r9
I
I
I
I
I
a
..
I
I
('
Letter to Mr. Vorsatz
Johnson Control Sampling Plan
June 26. 1997
Page6
JUL O 9 1997
SUPERFUND SECTION
in a Jog book designated for this particular investigation. ·
Since the site eontaminantl consist primarily of metals which are known to easily sorb to
organic sediments, sediment samples will be collected from fine, silty, dark•colored sediments
containing relatively high organic contents. The sampler will record the physical characteristics of
each sediment sample (color, shten, odor, etc ... ) in a log book designated for this particular
investigation. I
Since surface water from S~em Lake may contain a naturally higher turbid:ty than surface
water from Lowery Creek, a backgtound surface water and sediment sample will be collected from ' . the south wing of Salem Lake at the Old Greensboro Road bridge.
I A surface water sample will be collected from the drinking water intake on Salem Lake to
address any potential public heallh \concerns. No sediment sample will be collected at this location.
Tile sample descrtptions and locations arc outlined in Table I and depicted in figures 1 and
2. Additional soil samples may b~ collected; if stained or devegetated sr,ils are eilGOUll!crcd; or if
I areas deSib'llated for composites are too large for one sample, If you have any questions regarding
this proposed sampllng plan, plca~c contact me at [phone], ext. 315.
Attachments
cc: File
Sincerely,
Douglas Moore
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Soction
APPROVED:_+,:..::...,;.....ea'--:::.....:,,-"""--"':L.....-...:.../--J../.~
P V sat:,, Chicfl
Site Management Section
-----

-
-------------.. -
•
.
"' '" ~ n.~
~ "' ~
..
. ,~&/it
:~>Hu~/i
fr #"' . -
·~: ,::t1'!},Y.r1o~:"f'J..1e't,tfil~f-'F4~-~
(
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT •OF
ENVIR_()NMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
January 22, 1998.
I
Mrs. Debbie Ha~tings, CHMM
I Johnson Controlp, Inc.
Automotive Systems Group
. I 5757 North Green Bay Avenue ' Post Office Box 591
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201-0591
I
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
Subj.: Analytidl Results -Expanded Site Inspection
Johnson <l.:ontrols -Globe Battery Division
2701 Joh6son Controls Drive
I Kernersville, Forsyth County, NC
I
US EPA ID: NCD 00 770 487
I
I
Dear Mrs. Hastings:
I
As you rec\uested today by phone, attached are copies of the a~alytical results
from the August i 997 Expanded Site Inspection (ESI) sampling trip at the subject
site. If you have ~ny questions, please contact me at [phone], ext 315. I .
cc: File Sincerely,
Douglas Moore
401 0Bf!:llLIN ROAD, SUITE 150, RALEIGH, NC27605
' PHONE [phone] f"AX 9 \ fl-71 5-3605
AN EQUAL 0PPOiTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLE0/1 Oo/o POST-CONSUMER PAPF.R
I
------------------------------------------------
•
I
·a.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
United States
·Environmental Protection
Agency I
Office of
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
Directive 9285.7-14FS
PB94-963311
EPA/540/F-94/02B
. July 1994
&EPA Using Qualified Data to.
Document an Observed Release
' Office of Emergency and Remedial ~esponse
Hazardous Site Evaluation Division (5204G) Quick Reference Fact Sheet
Abstract
Data validation checks the accuracy of analytical data, and qualifies results that fall outside performance criteria of
the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). Results qualified with a "J" are estimated concentrations that may be
biased, but may be used to determine an, observed release in Hazard Ranking System (HRS) evaluation. This fact
sheet explains the conditions for use of 7J"-qualified data, and introduces factors which compensate for variability
and enable their use in HRS evaluation.1
Why Qualify Data?
I
Chemical concentration data for environmental
decision-making are generated using analytical
methods. EPA analytical chemistry methods are
designed to provide the definitive analyte
identification and quantitation needed to establish an
observed release under the Hazard Ranlfing System
(HRS). Routine operational variations in sampling
and analysis inevitably introduce a degree of error
into the analytical data. De.ta validationi checks the
usability of the' analytical dat for HRS evaluation and
identifies the error (bias) present. Tod validation
process qualifies the biased data. Cert,iin types of
qualified data for release and background samples
may be used to determine an observed re.lease.
EPA Data Qualifiers
• I EPA analytical methods ( e.g., SW-846 and Contract
Laboratory Program [CLP]) introduce a riumber of
Quality Assurance/Quali'}' Control' :(QA/QC)
mechanisms during the course of sample analysis to
measure qualitative and quantitative acctiracy. ,,.,._,
Such mechanisms include matrix spikes, m1atrix spike
duplicates, laboratory control samples, Jurrogates,
blanks, laboratory duplicates, and quart'erly blind
performance evaluation (PE) samples. $urrogates
and spikes are chemically similar to the analytes of
interest and thus behave similarly d~ing the
analytical process. They are introduced cir "spiked"
at a known concentration into the field samples
before analysis. Comp::.rison of the known
concentrations of the surrogates and spikes with their
analytical results.measures accuracy, and may inclicate
bias caused by interferences from the sample meclium
(matrix effect).','-' Laboratory control samples
contain known concentrations of target analytes and
are analyzed in the same batch as field samples.
Their results are used to measure laboratory
accuracy. Blanks are analyzed to detect any
extraneous contamination introduced either in the
Field or in the laboratory. Laboratory duplicates
consist of one sample that undergoes two separate
analyses; the results are compared to determine
laboratory precision. Quarterly blind PE samples also
evaluate lab precision.
CLP and other EPA analytical methods include
specifications for acceptable identification, and
minimum and maximum percent recovery of the
target analytes and QA/QC compounds. ·Data are
validated accorcling to guidelines which set
performance criteria for instrument calibration,
anal·-te identification, and identification and recovery
of the QA/QC compounds. ,,.., The National
Functional Guidelines for Data Review used in EPA
validation were designed for data generated under the
. CLP organic and inorganic analytical protocols.'.2.3'.
The guidelines do not preclude the validation of field
and non-CLP data; many EPA Regions have adapted
the National Functional Guidelines for Data Review to
validate non-CLP data. Data which do not meet the
" ,,'..;• .... · ,. .. ~ .
guidelines' performance criteria are qualified. to
indicate bias or QC deficiencies. The data validation
report usually explains why the data were qualified
and indicates the direction of bias when it can be
determined. Most EPA validation guidelines use the data qualifiers presented below. 1• (Other data
qualifiers besides these are in use; always check the
validation report for the exact list of qualifiers and their meanings.)
'U' qualifier --the analyte was analyzed for,
but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit. For practical
1i"urposes, "U' means "not detected"; the result
is usable for characterizing background
concentrations for HRS evaluation. 5
'J' qualifier •· the analyte was positively
identified; the associated numerical value is
the approximate concentration of the analyte in
the sample. "J" data are biased, but provide
definitive analyte identification, and are usually
reliable. They may be used to determine an
observed release under conditions specified
later in this fact sheet. '
'N' qualifier ·· the analysis indicates the
presence of an analyte for which there is
presumptive evidence to make a "tentative
identification.' 'N" data are not sufficiently
definitive for HRS evaluation.
'NJ' qualifier •· the analysis indicates the
presence of an analyte that has been
"tentatively identified" and the associated
numerical value repre ·ents its approximate
concentration. "NJ" data are not sufficiently
definitive for HRS evaluation.
'UJ' qualifier ·· the analyte was not detected
above the reported sample quantitation limit.
However, the reported quantitation limit is
approximate and may or may not represent the
actual limit of quantitation necessary. to
accurately and precisely measure the analyte in
the sample. "UJ" non-detects are not definite;
the ruialyte may be present. The result can be
used to document non-detects in background
sam pies under certain conditions.
I analyte cannot be verified. EPA does not use
"R" data because they are considered
unreliable. ' ttll-
. , Validated data that are not qualified are unbiased,
and can be used at their reported values for HRS
evaluation.
Criteria for Determining an Observed Release with
Chemical Dnta
Chemical data demonstrate an observed release when
all of the following are true:
1. The release of a hazardous substance is at least
partially attributable · to the site under
investigation ..
2. The release sample concentration is greater than
or equal to the appropriate detection limit (e.g.,
sample quantitation limit [SQL]).
3. If background levels are below detection limits,
the release sample concentrati_on must be greater
than its detection limit, or, if background levels
are greater than or equal to detection limits, the
release sample concentration must be at least
three times the background concentration. 7
Direction of Bias in 'J'-Qualified Data
It is important to understand the bias associated with
'J"-qualified data when using them for HRS
evaluation. "J" data may have high, low, or
indeterminate bias. A low bias means that the
reported concentration JS most likely an
underestimate of the true concentrstion. For
example, data may be b_iased low when sample
holding times for volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
are exceeded or when the recovery of QA/QC
compounds is significantly less than the true amount
originally introduced into the sample. A high bias means that the reported concentration is most likely
an overestimate of the true concentration. A bias is indeterminate when it is impossible to ascertain
whether the. concentration is an overestin13te or an
underestimate. For example, an indeterminate bias
could result when matrix effects obscure QA/QC
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I 'R' qualifier •. the sample results are rejected compounds.
due to serious deficiencies in the ability to
analyze the sample and meet quality control
criteria. The presence or absence of the
2
J
I
[ID 00 ffi ~ TI 1
I
' . ·r ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
;.·1
:~j
' ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
Qualified Data and Direction or Bias
. '
Qualified data may be · used wheri it can be . I demonstrated that the data meet the ,HRS rule for
determining an observed release desp,ite the bias in
the reported concentrations. This condition depends
on the direction of bias: low bias dad may be used
for release samples, and high bias datl may be used
for background samples. Low bias release· samples ' are underestimates of true concentration. Under-
estimated release concentrations that 'still meet the
HRS criteria ( e.g., they are still : three times
background level) clearly establish 'an observed
release. High bias background :samples are
overestimates of background level. If the
concentration of unbiased release '.samples still
significantly exceeds an overestimated background
level according to HRS criteria, an observed release
is clearly established. Similarly, an obs'erved release
is established when low bias release concentrations
signjficantly exceed high bias : background
concentrations according to the HRS criteria.
I ' These scenarios show that low bias "J."qualified data
may be used for release samples at their reported
concentrations, and that high bias "J."qualified data
may be used for background samples at their
reported con.centrations.
' High bias release samples may not be used at their
reported concentrations because they are an
overestimate of true concentration; : the true
concentration might be less than the HRS criteria for
an observed release. The reported conc~ntration for
low bias background concentrntions inay not be
compared to release samples be :ause it is most likely
an :}mderestimate of background level;\ the. release
sample concentration might not significantly exceed
the background concentration. Howev'er, high bias
release data and low bias background data may be
used with factors which compensate for the variability
in the data. The factors will enable tli_ese types of
biased data to meet HRS criteria for deiermining an
observed release. ·
Factors for Biased Data: Tables 1 through 4 (pages
6-13) present analyte-specific factors to: address the
uncertainty when determining an observed release
using high bias release data and low biaslbackground
data. The factors are derived from percent recoveries
of matrix spikes, surrogates, and labor~tory control
samples in the CLP Analytical Resulis Database
(CARD) from January 1993 to March 1994 .
3
The range of CARD data for each analyte includes 95
percent of all percent recoveries. Discarding outliers
left 95 percent of the CARD data available for
calculating factors. The factors are ratios of percent
·~covery values at the 97.5 and 2.5 percentiles. The
ratios generally show a consistent pattern.~:
. ~ .;·
An attempt to "convert" a biased value tt its true
concentration · is not recommended·· because the
CARD data do not differentiate and quantify
individual sources of variation. The factors are
applied as "safety factors" to ensure that biased data
can be used to meet HRS criteria for determining an
observed release. Dividing a high bias value by a·
factor effectively deflates it from the high end of the
range to the low end (lo·.·. bias value). Multiplying a
low bias value by the factor effectively inflates it to a
high bias value. Use of the ratio of percentiles is a
·•worst-case" assumption that the data are biased by
the extent of the range of CARD data considered.
The factors either inflate the values to the high end of
the range, or deflaie the data to the low end, and thus
compensate for the apparent variability when
comparing a high bias value to a low bias value (see
Exhibit 1).
Factors have been selected for all analytes in the CLP
Target Compound List ( organic analytes) and Target
Analyte List (inorganic analytes). Some· organic
factors were derived from matrix spike percent
recoveries, and some from surrogate percent
recoveries, depending on availability of data. When
both matrix spike and surrogate data were available
for the same compound, the larger value
(representing more extreme high and low percent
recoveries) was used. Laboratory control samples
were used to calculate some of the inorganic factorsc
A default factor of 10 was used for analytes when
percent recovery data were unavailable.
Application of the Factors: Exhibit 1 shows how to
apply the factors to "J" qualified data. High bias
background data, low bias release data, and unbiased
data may be used at their reported concentrations.
Multiply low bias background sample. data by the
analyte-specific factor to bring them to their new
value. The new background value effectively becomes
a high bias value that may be u,;ed to determine an
observed release. Divide high bias release sample
data by the analyte-specific factor to bring them to
their new value. The new release sample value
effectively becomes a low bias result that may be used
•
Exhibit 1: Use of Factors for "J".Qualified Data
I .. Type of Sample Type of Bias
No Bias
Background
Low Bias Sample
High Blas
Unknown Bias
No Blas
Release
Sample Low Bias
High Blas
Unknown Bias
to determine an observed release. Note: Adjusted
release and background values must still meet HRS criteria (e.g., release concentration must be at least three times background level) to determine an observed
releaie.
Examples Using Trichloroethene in Soil:
1. Release sample data biased low, background
sample data biased high.
Release sample value:
Background sample value:
30 µg/kg (J) low bias
10 µg/kg (J) high bias
In this instance, the direction of the bias indicates
that the release sample c·oncentration exceeds
background by more than three times, so an observed
release is established (provided all other HRS criteria are met). Use of the factors is not needed.
2. Release sample data unbiased, background sample
data biased low.
Release sample value: 30 µg/kg no bias Background sample value: 10 µg/kg (J) low bias
To use the data to establish an observed release, multiply the background sample value ':,y factor given for trichloroethene (1.8). No facior is needed for the release sample.
New background sample value:
(10 µg/kg) x (1.8) = 18 µg/kg (J) high bias
Action Required . ·
None: Use concentration without factor
Multiply concentration by factor
None: Use concentration without factor
Multiply concentration by factor
None: Use concentration without factor
None: Use concentration without factor
Divide concentration by factor
Divide concentration by factor
4
The release sample concentration does not exceed the new background level by a factor of three, so an observed release is not established.
3. Release 'sample data biased high, background
sample data unbiased.
Release sample value: 75 µg/kg (J) high bias
Background sample value: 15 µg/kg no bias
To use the data to establish an observed release, divide the release sample value by the factor for
trichloroethene (1.8). No factor .is needed for the background sample.
New release sample value:
(75 µg/kg) + (1.8) = 42 µg/kg (J) low bias
The new release sample concentration does not
exceed background concentration by a factor of three, so an observed release is not established.
4. Release sample data biased high, background
sample data biased low.
Release sample value: 100 µg/kg (J) high bias Background sample value: 10 µg/kg (J) low bias .
To use the data to establish an observed release, divide the release sample value and multiply the
background sample value by the factor given for trichloroethene in soil (1.8).
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
New release sample value: • I
(100 µg/kg) + (1.8) = 56 µg/kg (J) low bias
New background sample value:
(10 µg/kg) x (1.8) = 18 µg/kg (J) high' bias
I
The new release sample concentration is three times
the new background concentration, sti an observed
release is established, provided all othei HRS criteria
are met.
Documentation Requirements for Use of Qualified
Data: When using "]"-qualified data to idetermine an
observed release, include the "J" -qualifier commentary
from the data validation report in the HRS package.
This step will ensure that the direction of bias is
documented.
Use of Other Factors: EPA Regions may substitute
higher factor values other than the onJs in this fact
sheet on a case-by-case basis wheri techrucally
justified. For example, other factors m~y be applied
to conform with site-specific Data Quality Objectives
(DQOs) or with Regional Standard Operating
Procedures (SOFs).10
Detection Limit Restrictions: Factors may only be
applied to "J" data with concentrations al>ove the CLP
Contract Required Quantitation Limit) (CRQL) or
Contract Required Detection Limit (CRDL). T-
qua!ified data with concentrations 'below CLP
detection limits cannot be used to d_ocument an
observed release.
Use or 'UJ'-Qualilied Data
• .: I
A combination of the "U" and "J" qualifiers indicates
that the reported value rr . .1y not accurate_ly represent
5
the concentration necessary to detect the analyte I in
the sample. Under limited conditions, "UJ" data can
be used to represent background when determining
an observed release. These conditions include
instances when there is confidence that the
background concentration has not been detected and
the sample measurement that establishes the observed
release equals or exceeds the SOL · or other
appropriate detection limit. This reasoning is based
on the presence of a high bias in the background
sample. Thus, UJ data can be used only when-all of
the following conditions apply:
The "UJ" value applies to the background
sample and represents the detection limit,
The "UJ" value is biased high, and
The release sample concentration exceeds the
SOL (or applicable detection limit) and is
unbiased or biased low.
Summary
Data validation checks the usability of analytical data
and identifies certain errors (bias). "]"-qualified data
identify that analytes are present, but the reported
values represent estimated concentrations associated
with bias. Low bias release data and high bias
background data may be used at the reported values.
High bias release data and low bias background data
may not be used at their reported concentrations
because they" do not establish an observed release
with certainty. Application of fact.ors introduced in
·.bis fact sheet compensate for" th., uncertainty, and
enable "J" data to be used to determine an observed
release.
. Table 1: Factors for Volatile Organic Analytes
SOIL MATRIX VOLATILE
ORGANIC Number of ANALYTES
CARD Factor
Samples
Reviewed
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE --10.0
1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 11144 1.5
, 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE -10.0
1, 1-DICHLOROETHANF 11144 1.4
1, 1-DICHLOROETHENE 2064 2.4
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 11144 1.4
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE {TOTAL} 11144 1.4
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE --10.0
2-BUTANONE 11144 1.4
2-HEXANONE 11144 1.5 . 4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 11144 1.5
ACETONE 11144 1.4
BENZENE 2060 1.7
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE -10.0
BROMOFORM -10.0
BRO MOM ETHANE 11144 1.4
CARBON DISULFIDE 11144 1.4
6
WATER l'.lATRIX
Number of
CARD Factor
Samples
Reviewed
--10.0
9180 1.2
-10.0
9179 1.3
1484 2.0·
9179 1.3
9179 1.3
-10.0
9179 · 1.3
9180 1.2
9180 1.2
9179 1.3
1482 1.5
-10.0.
-10.0
9179 1.3
9179 1.3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
' . Table 1:
I
VOLATILE
ORGANIC I
ANALYTES :
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE I
CHLOROBENZENE
I
. ' CHLOROETHANE I
' CHLOROFORM I
CHLOROMETHANE ' I
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE I
METHYLENE CHLORIDE I
STYRENE ' '
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE I
TRICHLOROETHENE ' I
VINYL CHLORIDE. !
' XYLENE (TOTAL) I
Factors for Volatile Organic Analyte9 (continued)
SOIL MATRIX WATER MATRIX
Number of Number of ·"
CARD Factor CARD Factor .
Samples Samples
Reviewed Reviewed
-10.0 -10.0
2058 1.6 1480 1.4
11144 . 1.4 9179 1.3
11144 1.4 9179 1.3
. 11144 1.4 9179 1.3
--· 10.0 -10.0
-10.0 -10.0
11144 1.5 9180 1.2
11144 1.4 9179 1.3 I
11144 1.5 9180 1.3
.
11144 1.5 9180 1.2
2029 2.0 1468 1.4
-10.0 -10.0
2046 1.8 1452 1.5
11144 1.4 9179 1.3
11144 1.5 9180 1.2
7 [ID 00 ill ~ u
..
' Table 2: Factors for Semivolatile Organic Analytes
SOIL MATRIX SEMIVOLATILE
ORGANIC Number of ANALYTES CARD Factor
Samples
Reviewed
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1978 3.5
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 11899 3.8
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 11899 3.8
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1980 3.8
2,2' -OXYBIS(1-CHLOROPROPANE) 11899 3.8
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 11889 8.9
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 11889 · 8.9
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 11896 4.0
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 11896 4.0
2,4-DINITROPHENOL 11889 8.9
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 1979 3.4
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE 11889 8.9
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 11889 8.9
2-CHLOROPHENOL 1930 3.2
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 11896 4.0
2-METHYLPHENOL 11899 3.8
2-NITROANILINE 11889 8.9
2-NITROPHENOL 11896 4.0
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 11898 4.3
3-NITROANILINE -10.0
4,6-DINITRO-2-METHYLPHENOL -10.0
4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYL ETHER --10.0
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL 1927 3.6
4-CHLOROANILINE 11896 4.0
4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYL ETHER 11899 8.9 .
4-METHYLPHENOL 11899 3.8
8
WATER MATRIX
Number of
CARD Factor
Samples
Reviewed
1375_ 2.9
7951 · 4.0
7951 4.0
1373 3.0
7951 4.0
7952 3.6
· 7952 3.6
7949 2.5
7949 2.5
7952 3.6
1375 2.6
7952 3.6
7952 3.6
1376 2.9
7949_ 2.5
7951 4.0
7952 3.6
7949 2.5
7951 6.0
-10.0
-10.0
-10.0
1375 3.5
7949 2.5
7952 3.6
7951 4.0
I
~
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
'Table 2:
SEMIVOLATILE
ORGANIC
ANALYTES
4-NITROANIUNE
4-NITROPHENOL
ACENAPHTHENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(A)PYRENE
BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(G,H,l)PERYLENE
BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY)METHANE
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)ETHER
B1S(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE
BUTYLBENZVLPHTHALATE
CARBAZOLE
CHRYSENE
01-N-BOTYLPHTHALA TE
01-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
DIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENE
DIBENZOFURAN
DIETHYLPHTHALATE
DIMETHYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENT ADI ENE
! .
Factors for Semivolatile Organic Analytes
SOIL MATRIX
Number of
CARD Factor
Samples
Reviewed
11889 8.9
1905 4.8
1965 3.1
11889 8.9
.. 10.0
11898 4.3
.. 10.0
-10.0
--10.0
--10.0.
11896 4.0
11899 3.8
11898 4.3
11898 4.3
-10.0
11898 4.3
--10.0
--10.0
11889 8.9
11889 8.9
. 11889 8.9
11889 8.9
-10.0
11889 8.9
--10.0
11896 4.0
11889 8.9
9
(continued)
WATER MATRIX
, Number of r
CARD Factor
Samples
Reviewed
7952 3.6.
1368 4.5
. 1361 3.0
7952 3.6
-10.0
7951 6.0
--10.0
-10.0
-10.0
-10.0
,· 7949 . 2.5
7951 4.0
7951 6.0
7951 6.0
-10.0
7951 6.0
--10.0
--10.0
7952 3.6
7952 3.6
7952 3.6
7952 3.6
--10.0
7952 3.6
--10.0
7949 2.5
7952 3.6
Table 2: Factors for Semivolatile Organic Analytes .,
SOIL MATRIX SEMIVOLATILE
ORGANIC Nu.mber of ANALYTES CARD Factor
Samples
Reviewed
HEXACHLOROETHANE 11899 3.8
4-NITROPHENOLI NDENO{1,2,3-CD) PYRENE --10.0
ISOPHORONE )1896 4.0
N-NITROSO-DI-N-PROPYLAMINE 1966 3.7
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE (1 \ --10.0
NAPHTHALENE 11896 4.0
NITROBENZENE 11896 ~-0
PENTACHLOROPHENOL 1895 18.8
PHENANTHRENE --10.0
PHENOL 1924 3.2
PYRENE 1901 8.3
10
I
(continued)
WATER MATRIX .-
Number of
, CARD
Samples
Reviewed
7951
.. -
7949
1 345
-
7949
7949
1359
-
1368 -
1369
Facto~
4.0 ,,
. 10.0 .
2.5 ..
3.7
10.0
2.5
2.5
3.7
10.0 .
3.5
4.9
,•
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
(' I wrn~~v,
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
-
'
.
PESTICIDE/PCB
ANALYTES
4,4'-000
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
ALDRIN
ALPHA-BHC
ALPHA-CHLORDANE
AROCLOR-1016
AROCLOR-1221
AROCLOR-1232
.
AROCLOR-1242
AROCLOR-1248
AROCLOR-1254
AROCLOR-1260
BETA-BHC
DELTA-BHC
DIELDRIN
Table 3: Factors for Pesticide/PCB Analytes·
SOIL MATRIX WATER MATRIX
I
Number of CARD Number of CARD :,
Samples Reviewed Factor Samples· Reviewed f)ctor,
--10.0 -10.0 •
-10.0 -: 10.0
1801 7.4 1353 4.6 '
1870 7.9 1350 4.8
--10.0 -10.0
.. 10.0 -. 10.0
-10.0 23305 8.7
-10.0 23305 8.7
-10.0 23305 8.7
10.0 23305 8.7 ' -
--10.0 23305 8.7
-10.0 23305 .,. 8.7
-10.0 23305 8.7
.. 10.0 -10.0
.. 10.0 -10.0
1886 6.2 1350 2.8
11 fTIIOOffi~u
' .
PESTICIDE/PCB
ANALYTES
ENDOSULFAN I
ENDOSULFAN II
ENDOSULFAN SULFATE
ENDRIN
ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
ENDRIN KETONE
GAMMA-BHC (LJNDANE)
GAMMA-CHLORDANE
HEPTACHLOR
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
METHOXYCHLOR
TOXAPHENE
.
Table 3: Factors for Pesticide/PCB Analytes (continued)
SOIL MATRIX WATER MATRIX
Number of CARD Number of CARD
Samples Reviewed Factor Samples Reviewed Factor
-10.0 -10.0
-. 10.0 -10.0
-10.0 -10.0 '
1866 8.5 1348 · 3.4·
.
-10.0 -10.0
-10.0 -· 10.0
1872 4.5 1350 3.1
-10.0 -10.0
1877 4.5 1351 3.6
-10.0 -10.0 .
-10.0 -10.0
-10.0 -10.0
12 @OOill~u
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I .. ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
INORGANIC
ANALYTES
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYWUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM ..
CHROMIUM
'•"'••
COBALT
COPPER
CYANIDE
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THAWUM
VANADIUM
ZINC
Table 4: Factors for Inorganic Analytes I ..
SOIL MATRIX WATER MATRIX
Number of CARD Number of CARD . ..
Samples Reviewed Factor Samples Reviewed Factor. · ..
1147 1.5 1686 1.2
1153 1.8 1688 1.2
1208 1.6 1701 1.2
1149 3.3 1686 1.1
1150 1.2 1686 1.2
1148 1.3 1685 1.2
1163 1.2 1685 1.1
1148 1.2 1686 1.2
1153 1.2 · 1685 1.2
1154 1.1 1683 1.2
884 1.4 -10.0
1149 1.2 1687 1.2
,
1331 1.3 1727 1.2
1143 1.2 1686 1.1
1151 1.2 1685 1.2
1563 1.7 -10.0
1150 1.2 1685 1.2
-10.0 -10.0
1190 2.3 1695 1.3
' 1152 1.6 1684 1.3
-10.0 -10.0
1197 , 1.7 1691 1.2
1152 1.2 1685 1. 1
1154 1.3 1689 1.2
13
References
1. U.S. Environmental ·Protection Agency, 1994.
CLP National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic .
Data Review. Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response. Publication 9240.1-0_5-01.
2. U.S. Enviroornental Protection Agency, 1993.
CLP National.Functional Guidelines for Organic
Data Review. Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response. Publication 9240.1-05.
3. U.S. Enviroornental Protection Agency, 1991.
Contract Laboratory Program Statement of Work for
Inorganics Analysis. Document No. ILM02.0
4. U.S. Enviroornental Protection Agency, 1991.
Contract Laboratory Program Statement of Work for
Organics Analysis. Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response. Document No. OLMl.8
5 .. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1992.
Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual. Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
Directive 9345.1-07.
14
I
6. U.S. Enviroornental Protection Agency, 1991. ~
Guidance for Performing Preliminary Assessments(.
Under CERCLA. Office ,of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response. Publication 9345.0-0lA: I
7. U.S. Eniriroornental Protection Agency:-1992.
Guidance for Performing Site Inspections under
CERCLA. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response. Directive 9345.1-05. · '
8. U.S. Enviroornental Protection Agency, . 1992.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Samples.
Enviroornental Response Team Quality Assurance
Technical Information Bulletin.
9. U.S. Enviroornental Protection Agency, 1986.· Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste (SW-846):
Physical arid Chemical Methods. Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response. Document No.
SW-846.
10. U.S. _Enviroornental Protection Agency, 1993.
Data Quality Objectives Process for Supe,fund.
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
Directive 9355.9-01.
I
D
g
I
I
I
91
I
I
I
I
I
I
' wooro~1J•
I
. S.EPA
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
5204G
Washington, DC 20460
$300 Penalty for Private Use
Additional copies can be obtained from:
National Technical Information Service (NTIS)
U.S. Department of Commerce
5285 Port Roye] Road
Springfield, VA 22161
[phone]
Order #94-963311
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.J
12 S? I [2 l]
I
I It I I I
I
I
I
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
It
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
Mr. Gary Bennett
. September 30, 1997
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Science and Ecosystem Support Division
980 College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30605-2720
Subject: Data Reinvestigation Request for Antech Limited CLP
RAS/SAS Analytical Results (EPA Case No. 97-0329)
Johnson Controls -Expanded Site Inspection (ESI)
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
US EPA ID: NCO 000 770 487 .
Dear Mr. Bennett:
The North Carolina Superfund Section requests that US EPA Region IV Science and
Ecosystem Support Division (SESD) re-investigate the routine and special analytical service S:L'llple
analytical results produced under the contract laboratory program with Antech Limited at the subject
site. The request is necessary to determine whether spectral interference is correctable for
contaminants flagged as "JN" in the data validation package qualifiers report.
The Johnson Controls facility uses large quantities of lead in the manufacture of automotive
batteries. Since lead was assigned a "JN" flag, the results for lead are considered unusable for HRS
purposes. This result adversely affec_ts the ES! by precluding the use of lead in the establishment
of contamination in onsite sources and to attribute any potential releases of lead found in off site
receptors to the onsite sources. The apparently conflicting quality assurance/quality control results
for several matrix spike and blind spike recoveries also prevents an accurate determination of the
bias that may be present in many of the samples.
As a result, the North Carolina Superfund Section would like to request that' all the soil
samples that were affected by "JN" flags be re-evaluated to determine if the spectral interference is
correctable to the point that the data would be considered reliable and legally defensible. If not, the
P.O. Box 29603, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-9603 Telephone 97 9:733.4995
An Equal Oppo~unity Affirmative Action Employer 50% Recycled/ 10% Post-Consumer Paper
I
le
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
i I
Letter to Mr. Bennett
EPA SESD
Page 2.
North Carolina Superfund Section requests that all the soil samples be re-extracted and re-analysed
in accordance with the CLP Statement of Work, and data resubmitted to EPA for validation.
Thanks for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, please contact
Douglas Moore at (919) 733-280 I, e~t 315.
cc: Pat DeRosa
Phil Vorsatz
Irene Williams
Sincerely,
Douglas Moore
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
P.O. Box 29603, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-9603 Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opponunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% Recycled/ 10% Post-Consum~r Paper
-
V
It
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
MEMORANDUM
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
SCIENCE AND ECOSYSTEM SUPPORT l)IVISION
OFFICE OF QUALITY ASSURANCE
REGION IV
980 COLLEGE STATION RD.
ATHENS, GA 30605-2720
DATE: May 7, 1998
SUBJECT: Chain of Custody for Johnson Control Globe Project
FROM: Keith Bates, Environmental Scientist
Office of Quality Assurance
TO: Doug Moore
State of North Carolina Superfund Program
Enclosed is the chain of custody (COC) for the Johnson Control Globe Project. This COC was
generated to send samples analyzed by the contract laboratory to the EPA laboratory.
If you have any questions, please call me at 706/355-8556
Antech Ltd.
Ship To:
Antcch L1J. Page __ ~_ nf _,
Chain of Custody Record 9'6'-Oo 53
One Triangle Drive
E,1x•n. PA 1563::!
(412) 73:1-1161
FAX (-l 12) 327-7793
For I-f1:bOraJ0ry usc·O{:-ij:, ,\"''.tr~·:/ .. ~.
~born.1':"ry.rrojecc 1••.o::. ,~_;>1 Y-1:1-·-~£..,.·,.'-•. '. .t'.·: -;_·~ \
Relinquished By: (Signature and Printed Name) Time ,.---Date/
16/~1h7
oa'te
Antech Quote_ ID No.: _______________________ _
Antech Contact Name: ~-----------------------
Client Purchase Order No.: _____________________ _
Method of Shipment: ---~--------------------
.•~TTEL l-i Sample ID
Sum lier
/Ip II
I\..? i 1
It../ 'o
Date Time
15·1;
I
Saniple llcM:ription
. F-1","½ Description
M '{Jrt., f' I,>
1M 0"'11' 70
M'{)M/17/
i'1i},',t f'? ;;t
1Mi,Ml"7S
!'II::> /"t l" 7 '1
~l?IL1fP 75
Y1~M r 71.
1"1\?011' 77
•~\OM(.) /6
°=
-~
~ ~
] ' cl
✓ ~-
v
J
V
✓
V
V
V
V
}-Lfl.,,(_
--- -- -
Time
-
_Sampler: --------,,-,,:--;-:;--,---------
(Printed Name) (!:iignaturcl
Sarnplc Return/Disposal:
~ Return to Client
D Disposal by Antcch
-
'X
'I.
y
)(
Results To
l lther (Pl..,._.... ,';pttifJ)
Dale Time
ID/3r;:,/97 \ o o o
[);Uc Tim:
Plea.-,e Check when Monitoring
Sample.~ are CollecteC:
I
0 Residual Chlorine Pn:~m
D Residual Chlorin('. Not l'rcscul
Please Check when VOA Vials
are Co!lec!ed: D Free of Bubbles
D Bubbles Present
(Specify in Spo::iaJ ln.,u,.,nion,JCommcm,)
No.of
Comain=
For Ulb Use Onfr Li.bor::uor,· !D ·
\
(
Client N,unc: __________________________ _
Company: ___________________________ _
Address: ____________________________ _
Invoice To:
Client Name: __________________________ _
Company: ___________________________ _
' /
,
-_._ -

-

-

-

-

-
a -

-

-

-
---•--
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
II
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4
Science and Ecosystem Support Division
980 College Station Road
Athens, Georgia 30605-2720
MAY 1 c) 1998 RECF'\.'ED
4SES-ASB MAY 2 G 7998
SUPERFUk. '"1::l-,
Douglas Moore
Nc·superfund Section
401 Overland Road
Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27605
Dear Mr. Moore:
Our laboratory provided analyses for metals on the Johnsons
Controls Globe site located in Winston Salem, North Carolina.
For these analyses and all analyses that are performed by this
lab, we follow internal quality control protocols to ensure that
the results we report are of high quality.
1 .
2.
3.
Some of the specific controls we employ are as follows:
Sample preparation includes reagent blanks to check for
contamination and reagent spikes to make sure the
preparation procedure is working properly. In addition, 10
percent of the samples in a project (by matrix) are analyzed
in duplicate and spiked.
Metals are always reported above the method detection limit
and below the highest standard in the calibration curve.
For example, if a sample contains the element in
concentrations above the highest standard, the sample is
diluted appropriately and analyzed again.
Our calibration curves are checked with standard reference
materials (SRM)' obtained from an outside source. The
recovery of the SRM must be within 10 percent of the
certified or accepted.ivalue. After the initial calibration
check, the curve is continuously checked throughout the
analytical run with either an SRM or a calibration standard.
These continuing checks occur after about every ten samples.
Analytical runs typically end with a calibration check so
that samples are bracketed by these checks.
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
2
4. Precision and accuracy for duplication and recovery are
compared to historical data (control limits). If sample
results fall outside the acceptable control limits, the
sample is analyzed again. If the sample fails again, the
results are flagged appropriately for the situation.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to call
me at ( 7 o 6) 3 5 5 - 8 812 .
S-incerely,
Jenny Seif.res, Chief
Inorganic Chemistry Section
-Page B-23
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
AnmoniLrn picrate
Arnnoniun sulfamate
Aniline
Anthracene
Antimony
Arsenic
Asbestos
Atrazine
Azinphos-ethyl
Azinphos-methyl
Aziridine
Bariun
Bariun cyanide
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzene
Benzene carbonyl chloride
Benzi dine
Benzo(a)pyrene
- ------,.,-... _;/ --HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
NAAQS
NESHAPS
CAS Numb~r (Ug/m"3)
000131-74-8
007773-06-0
000062-53-3
000120-11-7
007440-36-0
AIR PATH\./AY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
Cmg/m-3)
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
-
007440-38-2
001332-21-4
001912-24-9
002642-71-9
3.?E-05* fibers/ml
000086-50-0
000151-56-4
007440-39-3
000542-62-1
000056-55-3
000071-43-2
000098-88-4
000092-87-5
000050-32-8
2.9E-04"'
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data C JUN94) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
** Indicates new hazardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
-
MCL/MCLG
(mg/l)
6,0E-03
5,0E-02
7.0E+OO*
3,0E-03
2,0E+OO
5,0E-03
2,0E-04
- -s ,' -
GROUND \./ATER PATH\./AY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
1.1E+01*
1.SE-02*
1. lE-02*
1.3E+OO*
z'.6E+OO*
1, 1E-01*
•
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
1. SE -02•
5. 7E·05*
3.8E·04*
1.2E·04*
2.9E·03*
3. 7E·07*
1.2E·05*
Page B-22
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Acetophenorie
Acetyl-2-thiourea, 1-
.'\crolein
Acrylamide
Acrylic acid
Acryloni tri le
Adipic acid
Aldicarb
Aldrin
Al lyl alcohol
Al lyl chloride**
Alumi m.rn
Aluminum phosphide
Arrmonia
CAS Nunber
000083-32·9
000208·96·8
000075-07-0
000067-64·1
000075·05-8
000098·86·2
000591 ·08·2
000107-02·8
000079·06-1
000079·10-7
000107·13-1
000124·04·9
000116-06-3
000309-00·2
000107-18·6
000107-05· 1
007429·90-5
020859-73·8
007664-41-7
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
NAAQS
NESHAPS
(Ug/m"3)
AIR PATH~AY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
9.4E·03*
2.1E·05*
1.0E-03*
2.1E-03*
1.0E-03
1.0E-01*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
1.1E-03*
···,
1.9E-06*
3.6E-05*
5.0E-07*
• Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) an_d curr~nt ~ion of
•• Indicates new -dous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ). chemical data ( JUN96 ). -_( .. - - - - - -) --- -
MCL/MCLG
(mg/l)
-
GRCXJND ~ATER PATH~AY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
2.2E+OO*
3. 7E+OO*
2.2E-01*
3.7E+00*
7.3E-01*
7.3E-03*
1.8E+01*
3. 7E-02*
3.7E-02*
1.BE-01*
3.5E+01*.
--
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
1.9E-05*
1.6E-04*
5.DE-06•
-
--r
)age B-24
)COM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
Benzonitrile
Benzothiazole, 1,2,-
Benzyl alcohol**
Benzyl chloride
Beryllium
Biphenyl, 1,1-
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
-
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether**
Bis(chloromethyl)ether
Bromodichloromethane
Bromomethane
Bromophenyl-phenylether, 4-**
-- - - -... - -
CAS NUfOOer
000205-99·2
000191-24·2
000207·08·9
000065-85-0
000100-47·0
000095-16·9
000100-51·6
000100-44·7
007440-41·7
000092-52·4
000117-81-7
000111-91·1
000111-44·4
039638-32·9
000542-88· 1
007440-42·8
000075-27·4
000074-83·9
000101-55·3
HA2ARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 substances
NAAQS
NESHAPS
(ug/m"3)
1.0E-02
AIR PATH~AY
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m-3)
2.1E-02*
Screen Cone
(mg/m.3)
1.0E-06*
7.4E-06*
2.4E-04
3.9E-08*
--
• Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ) .
** Indicates new 1rdous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ). . .. ) .
.. •
-
MCL/MCLG
(mg/L)
4.0E-03
6.0E-03*
1.0E-01*
-I' -
GROUND ~ATER PATH~AY
Reference Oose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
1. 5E+OZ•
1. 1E+01
1.BE-01*
1.BE•OO*
7.3E-01*
1 .SE+OO
3.3E+OO*
7.3E·01*
5.1E-02*
Screen Cone
Cmg/l)
1.2E-04*
I .2E-03*
5.0E-04*
2.C!:-05*
6. 1E-03*
7.7E·05*
1.2E·03
1.4E-03*
?age B-25
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Brornoxyni l
Butadiene, 1,3-
Butanol
Butylbenzyl phthalate
Butyric acid, 4-(2,4~dichlorophenoxy)
Cadmium
Calcium*•
Captan
Carbaryl
Carbazole"'*
Carbofuran
Carbon.disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Carbophenoth ion
Ces i un
Chloral
Chlordane
Chlordane, alpha-**
Chlordane, garrma-**
CAS Nunber
001689-84-5
000106-99-0
000071-36-3
000085-68-7
000094-82-6
007440-43-9
007440-70-2
000133-06-2
000063-25-2
000086-74-8
001563-66-2
000075-15\0
000056-23-5
000786-19-6
007440-46-2
000075-87-6
000057-74-9
005103-71-9
005566-34-7
.) .. :/ HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
NAAQS
NESHAPS
(ug/m-3)
AIR PATHUAY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/m-3)
7.3E-01*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
8. ?E-06*
1.4E·06*
1.6E-04*
6.6E-06"'
* Indicates
** Indicates
difference between previous version of chemical data C JUN94 _) and c~~r-version
111.rdou .. stan __ curr .. ersi .. ch .. dat-N96..,,, -
of chemical data ( JUN96 ). ---- -
MCL/MCLG
(mg/l)
5.0E-03
4.0E-02
5.0E-03
2.0E-03
- -
GROUND UATER PATHUAY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
7.3E-01*
3. 7E+00"'
7.3E+00*
2.9E·01*
1.8E-02*
4. 7E+00*
3. 7E+00*
3. 7E+00*
2.6E-02*
7.3E-02*
2.2E-03*
-
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
2.4E·02*
4.3E-03
6.6E-04*
6.6E-05*
-
--'age B-26
iCOH Data Version:
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Chlorine cyanide
Chloroaniline, p-
Chlorobenzene
Chlorobenzilate**
Chloroform
r
JUN96
Chlorornethane
Chloromethyl methyl ether
Chloromethyloxirane, 2·
-
Chloronaphthalene, 2-
Chlorophenol, 2-
Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether, 4-**
Chloroprene**
Chlorpyrifos
Chromiun
Chromium( 111)
Chromium(VI)
Chrysene
-- - - -... --HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376
NAAQS
NESHAPS
CAS Nurber (ug/m"3>
000506-77-4
000059·50-7
000106-47-B
00010B-90-7
000510-15-6
000067-66-3
000074-B7·3
000107-30-2
000106·69-B
000091·5B-7
000095·57-B
007005-72-3
000126-99-B
002921-BB-2
007440-47-3
016065-B3·1
01B540-29-9
00021B-01·9
Substances
AIR PATH~AY
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
2.1E-02*
1.0E-03*
7.3E-03
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3>
3.2E-05
1.1E-04*
1.4E-03*
2.DE-03*
2.0E-07*
2.0E-07*
--
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
** Indicates new h~7ardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
-
MCL/MCLG
(mg/L)
1.0E-01*
1.0E-01
- -s -
GROUND ~ATER PATH~AY
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
1.8E+00*
7 .3E+01*
1.SE-01*
7.3E-01*
7 .3E-01
3.7E-01*
7 .3E-02*
1.BE-01*
1.1E-01*
1.BE-01*
3. 7E+01*
1.BE-01*
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
3.2E·04
1.4E-02*
6.6E·03*
B.6E·03•
1.2E-02*
Page B-27
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Cobalt
Copper
Coppei:-cyanide
Counaphos
Creosote
Crcsol, m-
CresGl, o-**
Cresol, p-
Cumene
r.yanazine
Cyanide
Cyanogen
Cyanogen bromide
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanone
~)'Clot rj mct.hy;~ 1:netr i ni.t r i ami n~
000
ODE.
DDT
i .. _ _.,,,
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
NAAOS
NESHAPS
CAS Nl.Xllber (ug/m-3)
007440-48-4
007440-50-8
000544-92-3
000056-72-4
008001-58-9
000108-39-4
000095-48-7
000106-44-5
000098-82-8
021725-46-2
000057-12-5
000460-19-5
000506-68-3
000110-82-7
000108-94-1
000121-82-4 .... ,_ .
000072-55-9
000050-29-3
AIR PATH\.JAY
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone Screen tone
(mg/m-3) (mg/m-3),
9.4E·03*
2.5E-05*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data C JUN94) and c~~raversion of chemical data ( JUN96 ) •
.;.Indi= n .. dous.;.tanc.;.curr .. ersio~ ch~~ data .. lt96 ..r' ----
MCL/HCLG
( mg/l)
1.3E+OO
,_
2.0E-01
-
GROUND \.JATER PATH\.JAY
-
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
1.BE·Ol*
1.8E+OO*
1.8E+OO
1.BE-01*
1. SE+OO*
7.3E-01*
1. SE-+00*
3.3E+OO*
1.BE-+02*
1. lE-01*
1.8E-02*
-
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
1.0E-04*
7.?E-04*
3.6E-04*
2.5E-04*
-
--.-Page B-28
SCDH Data Version: JUN96
19 AIJG 96
Substance Name
DEF
Oi-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Dial late**
-
Diazinon
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Oibenzofuran
Oibromo-3-chloropropane, 1,2-
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromoethane, 1,2-
0 i camba
Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-
Dichlorobenz:ene, 1,3-
Dichlorobenzene, 1,4-
Dichlorobenzidine, 3,3-
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dichloroethane, 1, 1-
Dichloroethane, 1,2-
Dir.hloroethylene,-1, 1·
-- - - -... ---HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
NAACS
NESHAPS
CAS Nunber (ug/m"3)
000078-48·8
000084-74·2
000117-84·0
002303· 16·4
000333-41·5
000053-70·3
000132·64·9
000096· 12 · B
000124-48·1
000106-93·4
001918-00·9
000095-50·1
000541·73·1
000106-46· 7
000091·94·1
000075·71·8
000075 · 34 · 3
000107-06·2
000075·35·4
AIR PATHWAY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
2. lE-04*
2. lE-01*
8.3E-01*
2.lE-01*
3. 7E-01*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
9.4E-05*
4.9E-05*
-
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
** Indicates new h~7ardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
i
-
MCL/MCLG
( mg/l)
2.0E-04"'
6.0E-02*
5.0E-05
6.0E-01
6.0E-01
7.5E·02
5.0E-03
7.0E-03
- -s -
GROUND UATER PATH~AY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
1. 1E·03*
3. 7E+00*
7.3E-01*
3.3E-02*
7.3E-01*
1.1E+00*
3.3E+00*
7.3E+00*
3.7E+00*
3.3E-01*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
1.4E·03
1 .ZE-05*
6.1E-05"'
1.0E-03"'
1.0E-06*
3.6E-03*
1.9E-04*
9.4E·04•
1.4E-04*
Page B-29
SCOM·Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2-
Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2-
Dichlorophenol, 2,4-
Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2,4-
Dichloropropane, 1,2-
Dichloropropene, 1,3-
Dichloropropene, cis-1,3-**
• Dichloropropene, trans-1,3-**
Dichlorvos
Dicofol
Dieldrin
Diethyl phthalate
Diethylene glycol
Diethylstibestrol**
Diisopropylmethyl-phosphonate
Dimethoate
Dimethoxybenzidine, 3,3-
Dimethyl phenol, 2,4-
' ;,,
' ' \
CAS Number
000156-59·2
000156-60-5
000120-83·2
000094 · 75 · 7
000078-87·5
000542-75·6
010061-01·5
010061-02·6
000062-73· 7
000115-32·2
000060·57·1
000084-66·2·
000111-46·6
000056-53-1
001445-75-6
000060-51 ·5
000119-90·4
000105-67·9
.... ;•,,
. · '.-.\ . ,
. ·,.'
HAZARD RANK°iNG SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
NAAQS
NESHAPS
(ug/m-3)
AIR PATH\.JAY
Reference oOse Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m-3)
4.2E-03*
2.1E·02*
5.2E-04*
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
\ 5.3E-07*
-~
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and c~rre-ersion of
... Indi ... n--dous.tancililcurr-ersio .. chem111111data-.N96 111111"' -chemical data ( JUN96 ) . ---
MCL/MCLG
(mg/l)
7.0E-02
1.0E-01
7 .DE-02
5.0E-03
--
GROUND \./ATER PATH~AY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
3.7E-01*
7.3E-01*
1. 1E-01*
3.7E-01*
1.1E-02*
1.BE-02*
1.BE-03*
2. 9E+OO*
7.3E-03*
7 .3E-01*
-
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
1.3E·03*
4.7E-04*
2.9E-04"
5.3E-06"
1.8E·08
6.1E-03*
-
- -
r -'age B-30
;rnM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Dimethyl phthalate
Dimethyl sulfate
Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, 7, 12-**
Oimethylbenzidine, 3,3 1-**
Dinitro-2-methylphenot, 4,6-**
Dinitrobenzene, 1,3-
0initrophenol, 2,4-
Dinitrotoluene, 2,4-
Dinitrotoluene, 2,6-
Dinoseb
Oioxane, 1 ,4-
Oioxathion
Diphenylamine**
Diphenylhydrazine, 1,2-
Diquat
0isul foton
Diuron
Endosulfan (I or II)
Endosulfan sulfate
-- -- -.,. --HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
NAAOS
NESHAPS
CAS Nunber (ugj_m"3)
000131·11·3
000077-78·1
000057-97·6
.000119-93-7
000534-52·1
000099-65·0
000051 ·28·5
000121·14·2
000606-20·2
000088-85·7
000123-91·1
000078-34·2
000122·39·4
000122-66·7
000085-00·7
000298·04·4
000330-54°1
000115-29·7
001031-07·8
376 Substances
AIR PATH~AY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
1.lE-05*
- -
• Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUM94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ) .
•• Indicates new n~~~rdous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
-
MCL/MCLG
(mg/L)
7.0E-03
2.0E-02
--s -
GROUND ~ATER PATH~AY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
3.?E-03*
7.3E-02*
7.3E·02*
3.7E·02*
3.7E·02*
9.lE-01
*
1.5E·03*
7.3E-02*
2.ZE-01*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
9.3E·06
1.3E-04*
1.3E-04*
7.7E-03*
1.lE-04*
Page B-31
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Nnme
Endothal l
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde
Endrin ketone**
Eth ion
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl benzene
Ethyl chloride
Ethyl ether
Ethyl methacrylate**
Ethyl rnethanesulfonate**
E thyld,i propyl th i ocarbamate, s-
Ethylene glycol
Ethylene glycol monoe.thyl ether
Ethylene thiourea**
Fenthion
Ferrous sulfate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
CAS Number
000145·73·3
000072·20·8
007421 ·93·4
053494-70·5
000563·12·2
000141·78-6
000100-41-4
000075-00·3
000060·29-7
000097·63-2
000062-50·0.
000759-94-4
000107·21-1
000110-80-5
000096-45·7
000055·38-9
007720-78·7
000206-44-0
000086-73-7
· ... )
HAZARD RANKI'NG SYSTEM
-Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
NAAQS
NESHAPS
(Ug/m"3)
AIR PATH',,/AY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
1. OE+OO*
1.0E+01*
2.1E-01*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m-3)
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ). .:.lrdi;; nll;'dous.;tanc~curr;.;ersi;.; chem.;. data;.;.N96 ~ ----
MCL/MCLG
(mg/l)
2.0E-03
7.0E-01
-
GROUND YATER PATHYAY
-
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
1.1E-D2*
1.BE-02*
3.3E+01*
3.7E+OO*
7.3E+OO*
3.3E+OO
9.1E-01*
7.3E+01*
1.5E+01*
2.9E·03
1.SE+OO*
1.SE+OO*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
7.?E-04
-& -
liiiil -r
Page B-32
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Fluorine
Formaldehyde
Formic acid
Furan
Furfural
Glycidylaldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
.. --
Heptachlorinated dibenzo·p-dioxin, 1,2,3,4,6,7,6-
Heptachlorinated dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-
Heptachlorinated dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,4,6,7,9-
Hexabromobenzene
Hexachlorinated dibenzo·p-dioxin, 1,2,3,4,7,8-
Hexachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3,6,7,8-
Hexachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3,7,8,9-
Hexachlorinated dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,4,7,8-
Hexachlorinated dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,6,7,8-
Hexachlorinated dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,7,8,9-
.. - -... ---HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
NAACS
~ESHAPS
CAS Number (ug/m.3)
007782-41-4
000050-00-0
000064-18-6
000110-00-9
000098-01-1
000765-34-4
000076-44-8
001024-57-3
035822-46-9
067562-39-4
055673-89-7
000087-82-1
039227-28-6
057653-85-7
019408-74-3
070648-26-9
057117-44-9
072918-21-9
376 Substances
AIR PATH~AY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
5.2E-02*
5.ZE-04*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m-3)
1.9E·04*
1.9E-06*
5.3E-09*
5.3E-09*
5 .3E-10*
1.9E-09*
1.9E-09*
5 .3E-10*
5.3E-10*
5 .3E-10*
*
-
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
** Indicates new ~~,ardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
----..
GROUND UATER PATHUAY
Reference Dose Cancer R is'(
HCL/MCLG Screen Cone Screen Cone
(mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l)
2.2E+DO*
7.3E+00*
7.3E+01*
3.7E-02*
1.lE·Ol*
1.5E·02*
4.0E-04 1.8E·02* 1.9E-05•
2.0E-04 4. 7E·04* 9.4E-06*
5.3E·08*
5.3E·08*
•
7.3E-02*
5.3E-09*
1.4E·08*
1.4E-08*
5.3E-09•
5.3E-09*
5.3E-09*
Page B-33
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
HeXachlorinated dibenzofuran, 2,3,4,6,7,8-
Hexachtorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclohexane, alpha-
Hexachlorocyclohexane, beta-
Hexach lorocyc l ohexan·e, delta-
Hexach lorocyc lopentadi ene
Hexachloroethane
Hexachlorophene
Hexane
Hexanone, z-••
Hydrazine
Hydrochloric acid
Hydrogen cyanide
Hydrogen sulfide
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Ioxyni l
Iron
Isobutanol
CAS Number
060851-34·5
000118·74-1
000087-68-3
000319-84-6
000319-85-7
000319-86-8
000077-47-4
000067-72-1
000070-30-4
000110-54-3
000591-78-6
000302-01-2
007647-01·0
000074-90-8
007783-06-4
000193-39-5
001689-83-4
007439-89-6
000078-83-1
HAZARb RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous ·substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
NAAQS
NESHAPS
(Ug/m"3)
AIR PATH\.IAY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
7 .3E-05*.
2.1E-01*
2.1E-02*
3.1E-03*
1.0E-03*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
5.3E-10*
5.3E-06*
1.1E-04*
1.4E-06*
4.6E·06*
6.1E-04*
S.OE-07*
* Indicates ** Indicates --difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and c~rraversion of 111.irdou-stanw curr-ers i-chellllllll data~N96 'liJIII" (al
chemical data ( JUN96 ). ..
MCL/MCLG
(mg/l)
1.0E-03
5.0E-02
GROUND \./ATER PATH\.IAY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
2.9E-02*
7 .3E-03*
2.6E-01*
3.7E-02*
1.lE-02*
2.ZE+OO*
7.3E-01*
1.1E·01*
1.1E+01*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
5.3E-09*
5.3E-05*
1.1E-03*
1.4E-05*
4.?E-05*
6.1E·03'
2.BE-05*
1.ZE-04*
&
iiii -r
age B-34
)CDH Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96.
Substance Name
lsophorone
KENZENE**
Kepone
Lead
l i ndane
Hagnesiun
Malathion
Maleic anhydride
Maleic hydrazide
Manganese
Mercury
Hethacrylonitrile
Methanol
Methomyt
Hethoxychlor
Methyl chlorocarbonate
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methyl methacrylate
----... --
CAS Nunber
000078-59-1
00000000000
000143-50·0
007439-92-1
000058-89·9
007439-95·4
000121-75-5
000108-31·6
000123-33·1
007439-96·5
007439-97·6
000126-98-7
000067-56· 1
016752-77-5
000072-43-5
000079-22· 1
000078-93-3
000108-10·1
000080-62·6
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
NAACS
NESHAPS
(ug/m-3)
1.SE+OO
AIR PATHYAY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/rn"3)
5.ZE-05*
3.lE-04*
3.7E-03*
1. OE+OO*
8.3E-02*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3>
--
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
** indicates new' -ardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
-
HCL/MCLG
(mg/l)
1.5E-02
2.0E-04
2.0E-03
4.0E-02
- -11
GROUND ~ATER PATH~AY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
7.3E+00*
1.1E-02*
7.3E·01*
3. 7E+00*
1.8E+01*
S.1E+OO*
1.1E-02*
3.7E·03*
1.8E+01*
9.1E-01*
2.2E+01*
2. 9E+OO*
2.9E+OO*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
6.6E·05*
Page B-35
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Methylcholanthrene, 3-**
Methylene bis (2-chloroaniline), 4,4-
Methylene bromide**
Methylene chloride
Methylenediphenyl diisocyanate, 4,4-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Metribuzin
Mirex
f1ol ytx:fenurn**
N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine**
N-ni trosopiperidine**\
Naphthalene
Naphthylamine**
Nickel
Nitric acid
Nitric oxide
Nitroaniline, 2-**
Nitroaniline, 3-**
--.. :>::~
HAZARD RAN~f~G SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
NAAQS
NESHAPS
CAS Number (Ug/m.3)
,000056-49-5
000101-14-4
0D0074-95·3
000075-09·2
000101-68·8
000091-57-6
021087-64-9
002385-85-5
007439-98-7
000621-64-7
000100-75-4
000091-20·3
000091-59-8
007440-02-0
007697-37-2
010102-43-9
000088-74-4
000099-09·2
AIR PATH\.JAY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
3.1E+OO*
2.1E-05*
1.SE-01*
2.1E-04
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m.3)
6.6E-05*
5.2E·03*
* Indicates
** Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and c~~r~version
nc;rdou~stan~ curri:;ersi;.; ch-= dat~N96;., -
of chemical data ( JUN96 ). --
MCL/MCLG
(mg/l)
5.DE-03
•
1111!!!1
GRCXJND \.JATER PATH\.JAY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
2.6E-02*
2.2E+OO*
9.1E-01*
. 1.8E·D1
1.5E+OO*
7:3E-01*
•
1111!!!1
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
6.6E-04*
1.1E-02*
1.2E-05
r
age B-36
COM Data Version: JUN96
9 AUG 96
Substance Name
Nitroaniline, p-
Nitrobenzene
Nitrogen dioxide
Nitroglycerine
Ni trophenol:, 2-**
Ni trophenol, 4-
Ni·tropropane, 2-**
lliiil
Nitroso-di-n-butylamine, N-
Nitroso-di-n-methylurethane, N-
~itrosodiethanolamine, N-
Nitrosodiethylamine, N-
~itrosodimethylamine, N-
Nitrosodiphenylamine, N-
Nitrosomethylethylamine**
Nitrosopyrrolidine, N·
Nitrotoluene, 4-
0ctamethylpyrophosphoramide**
Oxybis (1·chloropropane), 2,3 1 -**
Parathion, ethyl·
-iiiill
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 substances
NAAQS
NESHAPS
CAS Nunber (ug/m"3)
000100·01·6
000098-95-3
010102-44-0 1.0E+02
000055-63-0
000088-75-5
000100-02-7
000079-46-9
000924-16-3
000615-53-2
001116-54-7
000055-18-5
000062-75-9
000086-30-6
010595-95-6
000930-55-2
000099-99-0
000152-16-9
000108·60-1
000056-38-2
AIR PATH~AY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
1.BE-02*
2.1E·02
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
9.1E-07
1.SE-06*
5.7E-08*
1. 7E-07*
4.0E-06*
-..
Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
~• Indicates new~ ,rdous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
)
..
MCL/MCLG
(mg/l)
.. .. s ..
GROUND ~ATER PATH~AY
Referer.ce Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
•
3. 7E-01*
7.3E·02
2.2E-01•
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
1.6E-05•
3.0E-05*
5.7E-07*
1.7E-06*
1. 7E-02*
3.9E-06
4.1E-05*
Page B-37
SCDM Data
19 AUG 96
Version: JUN96
Substance Name
Parathion, methyl·
PCBs
Pentachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3,7,8·
Pentach l or i na ted di benzof uran, 1, 2, 3, 7, 8-
Pentachlorinated dibenzofuran, 2,3,4,7,8-
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloroethane
Pentachloronitrobcnzene
Pe11tachlorophenwl
Phenanthrenc
Phenol
Phenyl sulficle
Phenylenediamine, m-**
Phenylmercuric 3cetate
Phorate
Phosgene
Phosphamidon
Phosphine
CAS Nunber
000298-00-.0
001336-36-3
040321-76·4
109719-77-9
·057117·41 ·6
000608·93-5
000076-01-7
000082-68-8
000087-86-5
000085-01-8
000108-95-2
000139-66-2
· 000108-45-2
000062-38-4
000298-02-2
000075-44-5
013171-21-6
007803-51-2
Phosphonodithioic acid, phenyl-o-ethyl-o-(4-nitrophenyl) 002104-64-5
HAZARD.RA~ktNG SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
NAAQS
NESHAPS
(ug/m-3)
AIR PATH\.IAY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/m.3)
3.1E-04*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m.3)
1.1E-10*. ·
·1.1E-09*
1.1E·10*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and c~~r.version of chemical data ( JUN96 ) .
.;. Indi= n .. rdou_:.st~nc~ curr-ersi~ chem~ data--N96 l..r ~ (11111 .. ..
MCL/MCLG
(mg/L)
5.0E-04
1.0E·03
GROUND \./ATER PATH\.IAY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
9.lE-03*
7.3E-04*
2.9E-02*
1.1E-01*
1.1E+OO•
2.2E+01*
2.2E-01
2.9E-03*
7.3E-03*
1.1E·02*
3.7E-OG.*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
l .1E-05*
1. 1E-09*
1. 1E-08*
1.1E-09*
3.3E:-04*
7.1E-04*
111!!1!1
-r ---__, iiil --.. -age B-38
::OM Data
~ AUG 96
Version: JUN96
Substance Name
Phosphoric acid
Phosphorous (elemental)
Phthalic anhydride
Plutoniun
Polychlorinated triphenyl
Potassium**
Potassium silver cyanide
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyridine
Cuinoline
Radium
Radon
Resorcinol
Ronnel
~afro le*"'
Selenium
Selcnourea
CAS Nunber
D07664·38-2
007723-14-0
000085-44-9
007440-07·5
012642-23-8
007440-09·7
000506·61-6
023950·58·5
000129·00-0
000110-86-1
000091-22·5
007440· 14-4
010043·92-2
000108·46-3
000299·84-3
000094-59-7
007782-49-2
000630-10-4
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
NAAOS
NESHAPS
(ug/m"3)
AIR PATH~AY
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
1.0E-02'
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
• Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and curr.ent version of chemical data ( JUN96 ) .
•• Indicates new ~~~~rdous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
MCL/MCLG
(mg/l)
5.0E-02
--
GROUND ~ATER PATH~AY
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
7.3E·04'
7.3E+01*
7.3E+OO*
2.7E+OO*
1.1E+OO*
1.8E+00*
1.8E-01*
1.BE-01*
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
Page B-39
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Silver
Silver Cyanide
Sodiun
Strontium
Strychnine
Styrene
Sulfuric acid
TB, 2,4,5·
TCOD
Tetrachlo,obenzene, 1,2,4,5-
Tetrachlorodibenzofuran, 2,3,7,8-
' Tetrachloroethane, i, 1, 1,2-
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2-
Tetrachloroethylene
Tetrachl?rophenol, 2,3,4,6-
Tetraethyl lead
TetraethyldithioPyrophosphate
Tetrahydrofuran
Thall iun
CAS Nl.ffTlber
007440·22·4
000506-64·9
007440·23·5
007440-24·6
000057-24·9
000100-42·5
007664-93·9
000093-80·1
001746-01·6
000095-94·3
051207-31-9
000630-20·6
000079-34·5
000127-18·4.
000058-90·2
000078-00·2
003689-24·5
000109-99·9
007440-28-0
,i
HAZARD RA~Ki'NG SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
NAAQS
NESHAPS
(ug/m-3)
AIR PATH\.IAY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/m-3)
1.0E+OO*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
5.0E-11*
5.3E-10*
3.3E-04*
4.2E·05*
*
• Indicates
** Indicates -difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and curr.version
ricrdou;.:,stan~ curr~ersi~ che= dat~N96 ). lll!!IIII
of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
MCL/MCLG
(mg/l)
1.0E-01
3.0E-08
5.0E-03
5.0E-04
11!!!!!!1 11!!!!!!1
GROUND \./ATER PATH\.IAY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
1.BE-01*
3.7E+OO*
2.2E+01*
1.1E·02*
7.3E+OO*
1.1E·02*
1.1E+OO*
3.?E-01*
1 .BE-02*
Cancer Risk:
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
5.3E·09*
3.3E-03*
4.3E-04*
1.6E·03*
- -
r
~age B-40
SCOM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Thiourea
Thi ram
Toluene
Toluene diisocyanate
Toluenediamine, 2,4-*•
Toluidine, o·**
Toluidine, p·"'*
Toxaphene
TP, 2,4,5-
T r i bromomethane
..
Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane, 1,1,2-
Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-
Trichloroethane, 1, 1, 1-
Trichloroethane, 1,1,2·
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
irichlorophenol, 2,3,5-
Trichlorophenol, 2,3,6-
Trichlorophenol, 2,4,5-
--liiil -HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
NAAQS
NESHAPS
CAS Nurrber (ug/m"3)
000062·56·6
000137-26-8
000108-88-3
000584-84-9
000095-80-7
000095-53-4
000106-49-0
008001-35·2
000093-72-1
000075-25·2
000076-13·1
000120-82·1
000071-55·6
000079-00·5
000079-01·6
000075-69·4
000933-78·8
000933-75 · 5
000095-95·4
AIR PATH~AY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
7.3E-05*
3.1E+01*
2. lE-01*
7.3E-01*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m"3)
2.2E-03*
1.SE-04*
*
--
"' Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
** Indicates new h~-1rdous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
-
MCL/MCLG
( mg/L)
1.0E+OO
3.0E-03
5.0E-02
1.0E-01*
7.0E-02
2.0E-01
3.0E-03
S.OE-03
--
GROOND ~ATER PATH~AY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
7.3E+00*
2.9E-01*
1.1E+03*
3.?E-01*
I .SE-01 *
1.1E+01*
3.7E+OO*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
2.7E·OS
4.5E·04
7.?E-05*
1. le-02•
1.SE-03*
7.7E-03*
Page B-41
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-
Trichlorophenol, 3,4,5-
Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2,4,5-
Trichloropropane, 1,2,3-
Triethanolamine
Tri flural ir.
Trinitrobenzene, 1,3,5-
Trinitrotoluene
Tris (2,3-dlbromopropyl) phosphate
Vanadium
Vanndium pentoxide
Vinyl acetote
Vinyl chloride
\.larfarin
Xylene, m-
Xylene, o-
Xylene, p-
Zinc
)
HAZARD RM/KING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
NAAOS
NESHAPS
CAS Number-. (ug/m-3)
000088-06-2
000609-19-8
000093-76-5
000096-18-4
000102-71-6
001582-09-8
_000099-35-I+
.000118-96-7
0001,6-72-7
007440-62-2
001314-62-1
000108-05-4
000075-01-4
000081-81-2
000108-38-3
000095-47-6
000106-42-3
007440-66-6
AIR PATH\.JAY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/m-3)
2.1E-01*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m-3)
7.9E-04*
2.8E-05*
• Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and.curre-ersion of chemical data ( JUN96 ). ~ ndi c--e"-ous __ ance .. urre-s i o-hemi111111ata -96 ) aJJr .. -11111
MCL/MCLG
(mg/LJ
2.0E-03
LOE+01
1.0E+01
LOE+01
-
GROUND \.JATER PATH\.JAY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
3.7E-01*
2.2E-01*
2.7E-01*
1.BE-02*
2.6E-01*
3.3E-01*
3.7E+01*
1.1E-02*
7.3E+01*
7 .3E+01 *
1.1E+01*
11!!!!!!!!1
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
7.7E-03*
1.2E-05*
1. lE-02*
2.BE-03*
4.SE-OS•
-.. •'age B-42
)COM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Zinc cyanide
Zinc phosphide
Zinc sulfate
-- ---HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
NAACS
NESHAPS
CAS Nunber (ug/m"3)
000557·21-1
001314-84-7
007733·02-0
AIR PATH'wAY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/m.3)
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/m.3)
--
Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
•~ Indicates new ~-~ardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
-
MCL/MCLG
(mg/L)
-s
GROUND 'wATER PATH'wAY
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
1.BE-+-00"'
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
Page 8-43
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Acetophenone
Acetyl-2-thiourea, 1.
Acrolein
Acrylamide
Acrylic acid
Acrylonitrile
Adipic,acid
Aldicarb
Aldrin
Al lyl alcohol
Al I yl chloride"'*
AluninU'P
Aluninun phosphide
Anmonia
CAS Number
000083-32-9
000208-96·8
000075-07-0
000067-64· 1
000075-05-8
000098-86·2
000591-08·2
000107-02-8
000079-06·1
000079-10·7
000107-13-1
000124·04·9
000116-06·3
000309-00·2
000107,18-6
000107-05-1
007429-90·5
020859-73-8
007664-41-7
MCL/MCLG
(mg/l)
HAZARD RA~KING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING \.JATER
Reference _Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
2.2E+OO*
3. 7E+OO*
2.2E-01*
3. 7E+OO*
7.3E-01*
7.3E-03*
1.8E+01*
3. 7E-02*
3.?E-02*
1.1E-03*
1.BE-01*
1.SE-02*
3.SE+Ol*
Cancer
Screen
(mg/L)
Risk
Cone
1.9E·05*
1.6E-04*
5.0E-06*
FDAAL
(ppm).
3.0E-01
FOOD CHAIN
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
8.1E+01*
1.4E+02*
8. lE+OO*
1.4E+02*
2.7E+01*
2.?E-01*
6.8E+02*
1.4E+00*
1.4E+OO*
4.1E-02*
6.BE+OO*
S.4E·01*
1.3E+03*
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
7.0E-04*
5.BE-03*
1.9E-04*
• Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and c~~re.:..;ersion of
.;.Indi;;. ncdous~tanc~curre;_rsio..;.chem~data-96 )~ ..
chemical data ( JUN96 ) . -111!!!!1 llll!!!I
ENVIRONMENTAL
A\.IOC/AALAC
Freshwater Saltwater
(ug/L) (ug/L)
/~
3. 0E+00 3.0E+OO*
1111!1 -
-'age B-44
;coM Data
9 AUG 96
-r
Version: JUN96 .. -illll -. ._ .. HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING ~ATER
- -- -
FCXXJ CHAIN ENV I RONM!::t-lT AL
Reference Dose Cancer Risk Reference Dose Cancer Risk AIIOC/AALAC
Substance Name
ArrmoniUTI picrate
Arrmoniun sulfamate
Aniline
Anthracene
Antimony
Arsenic
Asbestos
A.trazine
Az inphos-ethyl
Azinphos-methyl
Aziridine
Bariun
Bariun cyanide
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzene
Ben1ene carbonyl chloride
~~nzidine
qen7.o( a )pyrene
MCL/MCLG
CAS Nl.mber (mg/L)
000131-74-8
007773-06-0
000062-53-3
000120-12-7
007440-36-0 6.0E-03
007440-38-2 5.0E-02
001332-21-4 7.0E+OO*
001912-24-9 3.0E-03
002642-71-9
000086-50-0
000151-56-4
007440-39-3 2_0E+OO
000542-62-1
000056-55-3
000071-43-2 5.0E-03
000098-88-4
OOOD92-87-5
000050·32-8 2.0E-04
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
7.3E+OO*
1.1E+01*
1.SE-02*
1.3E+00*
2.6E+OO*
1. 1E-01 *
*
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
1.SE-02*
5.?E-05*
3.8E-04*
1.ZE-04*
.1.2E·05*
FDAAL
(ppm)
screen Cone
(mg/kg)
2 .7E+02*
4.1E+02*
5.4E-01*
4. lE-01*
4.7E+01*
9.SE+Ol*
4.1E+00*
*
Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
'* Indicates new h~7ardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
5.SE-01*
2.1E-03*
1.4E·02*
1. 1 E-01"'
1.4E·05*
4.3E-04*
Freshwater
(ug/ll
i .9E+02
1.0E-02"'
Saltwater
(ug/l)
1. 9E+02*
1.0E-02*
Page B-45
SCOM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
Benzonitrile
Benzothiazole, 1,2,-
Benzyl alcohol**
Benzyl chloride
Beryltiun
Biphenyl, 1,1-
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Bis(Z-chloro~thoxy)methane
Bis(Z-chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether**
Bis(chloromethyl)ether
Boron
Bromodichloromethane
Bromomethane
Bromophenyl-phenylether, 4-**
CAS Number
000205-99-2
000191-24-2
000207-08-9
000065-85-0
000100-47-0
000095-16-9
000100-51-6
MCL/MCLG
(mg/L)
000100-44-7
007440-41-7 4.0E-03
000092-52-4
000117-81-7 6.0E-03*
000111-91-1
000111-44-4
039638-32-9
000542-88-1
007440-42-8
000075-27-4 1.0E-01*
000074-83-9
000101-55-3
,--~,
\ ;
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous·Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING \.IATER
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
1. 5E+02*
1.1E+01-
1.8E-01*
1.8E+OO*
7 .3E-01*
1.5E+OO
3.3E+OO*
7.3E-01*
5.1E-02*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
1.2.E-04*
2.0E-05*
6. lE-03*
7.7E-05*
1.2E-03
3.9E-07*
1 ."4E-03*
FDAAL
(ppm)
FOOD CHAIN
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
5.4E+03*
4.1E+02
6.BE+OO*
6.8E+01*
2.7E+01*
5.4E+01
1. 2E+02*
2. 7E+01*
1. 9E+OO*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and c~~re~ersion of chemical data ( JUN96 ) .
.. Indi .. ncdous .. tanc-curr .. ersi .. chem .. data 111111196 .... --.. ..
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
4.3E-03*
7.3E-04*
2.3E-01*
2.9E-03*
4.SE-02
1.4E·05*
5.1E-02*
ENVIRONMENTAL
Al,./QC/AALAC
Freshwater Saltwater
(ug/l) (Ug/l)
11111
--r
Page B-46
~CDM Oala Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
.. .. HAZARD RANKiNG SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance-Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING ~ATER
liiiil -
FOOO CHAIN
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Substance Name
8romoxynil
Butadiene, 1, 3-
Butanol
Butylbenzyl phthalate
Butyric acid, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)
Caciniun
Calciun ..
Captan
Carbaryl
Carbazole**
Carbofuran
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Carbophenoth ion
Cesiun
Chloral
Chlordane
Chlordane, alpha-**
Chlordane, garrma-**
MCL/MCLG
CAS Nurrtier (mg/L)
001689-84-5
000106-99-0
000071-36-3
000085-68-7
000094-82-6
007440-43·9 5.0E-03
007440-70-2
000133-06-2
000063-25-2
000086-74-8
001563-66-2 4.0E-02
000075-15-0
000056-23-5 5.0E-03
000786-19-6
007440-46-2
000075-87-6
000057-74-9 2.0E-03
005103-71-9
005566-34-7
7.3E·01*
3. 7E+00*
7.3E+OO*
2.9E-01*
1.BE-02*
4. 7E+00*
3.7E+OO*
1.8E-01*
3. 7E+00*
2.6E-02*
7.3E-02*
2.ZE-03*
2.4E·02*
4.3E·03
6.6E-04*
6.6E·05*
FDAAL
(ppm)
3.0E-01
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
2.7E+01*
1.4E+.02*
2.7E+02*
1.1E+01*
6.BE-01*
1.8E+02*
1.4E+02*
6.BE+OO*
1.4E+02*
9.5E-01*
2.7E+00*
8. 1E-02*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
•• Indicates new hRtardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
9.0E-01*
1.6E·01
2.4E-02*
2.4E-03*
ENVIRONMENTAL
AWC/AALAC
Freshwater
(ug/L)
1.1E+OO
4.3E-03
Saltwater
(ug/l)
1. 1E+OO*
4.3E·03*
Page 8-47
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Chlorine cyanide
Chloro-3-methylphenol, 4-
Chloroaniline, p-
Chlorobenzene
Chlorobenzilate••
Ch lor·oform
Chloromethane
Chloromethyl methyl erher
Chloromethylcxirane, ?.-
Chlcronaph!halene, 2-
Ch loropher.ol, 2-
Ch lorophenyl -phenyl ether, 4-**
Chloroprene**
Chlorpyrifos
Chromiun
Chrorniun(Itl)
Chromiun(VI)
Chrysene
MCL/MCLG
CAS Nunber (mg/l)
000506-77·4
000059-50·7
000108·90·7 1.0E-01*
000510-15·6
000067-66·3 1.0E-01*
000074-87·3
000107-30·2.
000106·89·8
000091-58·7
000095-57·8
007005-72-3
000126-99·8
002921-88·2
007440-47-3 1.0E-01
016065-83·1
018540·29·9
000218-01·9
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING \./ATER
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
1.8E+OO*
7.3E+01*
1.5E·01*
7.3E·01*
7.3E·01
3.7E-01*
7.3E-02*
2.9E+OO*
1.BE-01*
1.1E-01*
1.8E·01*
3.7E+01*
1.BE-01*
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
3.2E·04
1.4E-02*
6.6E-03*
8.6E-03*
1.2E-02*
FDAAL
(ppm)
• Indicates
.. 'nd ..
~~~~ce between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and c~rrtaversion of chemical_ data (
,~rdoul11111istanM curwer•-ch-dati111fN961i!!!M"" ---
FOOD CHAIN
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
Cmg/kg)
6.BE+01*
2. 7E+03*
5.4E+OO*
2 .7E+01 *
2. 7E+01
1.4E+01.t
2.7E+OO*
1.1E+02*
6.BE+OO*
4.1E+OO*
6.BE+OO*
'1.4E+03*
6.BE-t-00*
JUN96 ).
11!!!!!1
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
.1.2E·02
5.ZE-01.t
2.4E-01.t
3.ZE-01*
4.3e-01•
ENVIRONMENTAL
Al,JQC/AALAC
Freshwater Saltwater
(ug/l) (ug/l)
4.0E-03
4.1E·02
1.1E+01*
2.1E+02
1.1E+01
i..
4.0E-03
4.1e-02•
1.1E+01*
2.1E+02
1 .1E+01*
IW!t
--r .. --.. liiill lllill ~ --- -Page B-48 HAZARD RANKiNG SYSTEM
SCDM Data Version: JUN96 Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
19 AUG 96 376 Substances
DRINKING ~ATER FOOD CHAIN
Reference Dose Cancer Risk Reference Dose
MCL/MCLG Screen Cone Screen Cone FDAAL Screen Cone
Substance Name CAS Nurber (mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l) (ppn) (mg/kg)
Cabal t 007440-48-4
Copper 007440-50-8 1.3E+OO
Copper cyanide 000544-92-3 1.8E-01* 6.8E+OO*
Counaphos 000056-72-4
Creosote 008001-58-9
Cresol, m-000108-39-4 1.BE+OO* 6.8E+01*
Cresol, o-** 000095-48-7 1.8E+OO 6.8E+01
C:-esol, p-000106-44-5 1.8E-01* 6.8E+OO*
Cunene 000098-82-8 1. SE+00* 5.4E+01*
Cyanazine 021725-46-2 7.3E-02* 1.0E-04* 2.7E+OO*
Cyanide 000057-12-5 2.0E-01 7.3E-01* 2.7E+01*
Cyanogen 000460-19-5 1. SE+00* S.4E+01*
Cyanogen bromide 000506-68-3 3.3E+OO* 1. 2E+02"'
Cyclohexane 000110-82-7
Cyclohexanone 000108-94-1 1.8E+02* 6.8E+03*
Cyclotrimethylenetrinitriamine 0001Z1-82-4 1. 1E·01* 7.7E·04* 4.1E+OO*
DDD 000072-54-8 3.6E·04* 5.0E+OO
DOE 000072-55-9 2.5E·04* 5.0E+OO
DDT 000050-29-3 1.8E·02* 2.5E·04* 5.0E+OO 6.BE·01*
Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
** Indicates new r~,ardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
--.. s -
ENVIRONMENTAL
Cancer Risk A\IQC/AALAC
Screen Cone Freshwater Saltwater
Cmg/kgJ (ug/LJ (Ug/l)
1.2E+01 1.2E+01*
3.BE-03*
5.2E+OO 5 .2E+00*
2.9E·02*
1.3E·02*
9.3E·03*
9.3E·03* 1.0E-03 1.0E·03
Page B-49
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
substance Name
DEF
oi-n-butyl phthalate
Oi-n-octyl phthalate
Dial laten
Diazinon
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
OiLenzofuran
Dibroo~-3-chloropropane, 1,2-
Di bromoch l orOl!lethane·
Dibrw~ethane, 1,2-
Dicamba
Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-
Dichlorobenzene, 1,3-
0 i ch lorobenzene, 1, 4-
Dich lorobenz idine, 3,3-
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Dichloroethane, 1, 1-
0ichloroethane, 1,2-
Dichloroethylene, 1,1-
MCL/MCLG
CAS Number (mg/l)
000078·48·8
000084 · 74 · 2
000117·84·0
002303· 16·4
000333·41·5
000053·70·3
000132·64·9
000096-12-8 2.0E-04*
000124·48·1 6.0E·OZ•
000106·93·4 5.0E·05
001918·00·9
000095·50·1 6.0E·01
•
000541·73·1 6.0E·01
000106·46·7 7.5E·02
000091·94·1
000075· 71 ·8
000075·34·3
000107·06·2 5.0E·03
000075·35·4 7.0E·03
HAZARD RANK'i NG SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING \./ATER
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
3. ?E+OO*
7.3E-01*
3.3E-02*
7.3E-01*
1.1E+OO*
3.3E+OO*
7.3E+OO*
3.7E+OO*
3.3E-01*
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
1.4E·03
1.2E-05*
6.1E-05*
1.0E-03*
1.0E-06*
3.6E-03*
1.9E-04*
9.4E-04*
1.4E·04*
FDAAL
(pp-n)
FOOD CHAIN
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
1 ~4E+02*
2.7E+01*
1. 2E+OO*
2. 7E+01*
4.1E+01*
1. 2E+02*
2. 7E+02*
1.4E+02*
1.2E+01~
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
5.2E·02
4.3E-04*
2.3E-03*
3.?E-05*
1.3E-01*
7.0E-03*
5.3E·03*
* Indicates difference between previous version Of chemical data ( JUN94) and c~rreJii.'ersion of chemical data ( JUN96 ). ~ndi;;n11;daus~tanc~curr;.rsio~chem~data••t96 )iliP' -.. .. .. 11!!!11
ENVIRONMENTAL
A\.ICC/AALAC
Freshwater saltwater
(ug/l) (ug/L)
ll!!!!!I
iill -r -~ge B-50
9 AUG 96
Substance Name
Oichloroethylene, cis-1,2-
Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2-
Dichlorophenol, 2,4-
Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2,4-
Dichloropropane, 1,2-
Dichloropropene, 1,3-
ilichtoropropene, cis-1,3-*"'
Oichloropropene, trans-1,3-**
Dichlorvos
Dicofot
Dieldrin
Diethyl phthalate
Diethylene glycol
Diethylstibestrol**
Oiisopropylmethyl-phosphonate
Dimethoate
Dimethoxybenzidine, 3,3-
"J imethyl phenol, 2 ,4-
---
HCL/HCLG
CAS Number (mg/l)
000156-59-2 7.0E-02
000156-60-5 1.0E-01
000120-83-2
000094-75-7 7.0E-02
000078-87-5 5.0E-03
000542-75-6
010061'01-5
010061-02-6
000062-73-7.
000115-32-2
000060-57-1
000084-66-2
000111-46-6
000056-53-1
001445-75-6
000060-51-5
000119-90-4
000105-67-9
.. .. liilil
HAZARD RANKiNG SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING ~ATER
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone Screen Cone FOAAL
(mg/l) (mg/l) C PfXll >
3.7E-01*
7.3E-01*
1.1E-01*
3.7E-01*
1~3E-03*
1.1E-02* 4.?E-04"'
1.BE-02* 2.9E-04*
5.3E-06* 3.0E-01
2.9E+01*
1.8E-08
2. 9E+00*
7.3E-01*
iiill
FOOO CHAIN
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
1.4E+01*
2.7E40.1*
4.1E+00*
1.4E+01*
4. lE-01*
6.BE-01*
6.BE-02*
1.1E+03*
1.1E+02*
2.7E-01*
2.7E+01*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data C JUN96 ).
** Indicates new n~~~rdous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 )." )
ENVIRONMENTAL
Cancer Risk Al.<lC/AALAC
Screen Cone Freshwater Saltwater
(mg/kg) (ug/l) (ug/l)
4.6E-02*
1.BE-02*
1.9E-03 1.9E-03
• •
6.7E-07
2.3E-01*
Page B-51
SCOH Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Narne
Dimethyl phthalate
Dimethyl sulfate
Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, 7, 12-**
Dimethylbenzidine, 3,31 -**
Dinitro-2-methylphenol, 4,6-**
Dini trobenzene, 1,3·
Dinitrophenot, 2,4·
Dinitrotoluene, 2,4-
Dinitrotoluenc, 2,6·
Oinoseb
Dioxane, 1,4·
Oioxathion
-D iphenylamine**
Diphcnylhydrazine, 1,2-
Diquat
Di sul foton
Diuron
Endosulfan Cl or II)
Endosulfan sulfate
MCL/MCLG
CAS Nunber (mg/l)
000131-11-3
000077-78-1
000057-97-6
000119-93-7
000534-52-1
000099-65-0
000051-28-5
000121-14-2
000606-20-2
000088-85-7 7.0E-03
000123-91-1
000078-34-.2
000122-39-4
000122-66-7
000085-00-7 2.0E-02
000298-04·4
000330·54-1
000115-29-7
001031-07-8
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING \.JATER
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
•
3.7E-03*
7 .3E-02•
7 ;3E-02•
3.7E-02•
3 .7E-02*
9. lE-01
8.0E-02*
1.SE-03*
7.3E-02*
2.2E-01*
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
9.3E-06
1.3E-04*
1 .3E-04*
7.7E-03•
1.1E-04*
FDAAL
(ppm)
FOOD CHAIN
Reference Dose cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
•
1.4E·01*
2.7E+OO*
2.7E+00*
1.4E+OO*
1.4E+OO*
3.4E+01
3.0E+OO*
5.4E-02*
2.7E+OO*
8.1E+00*
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
3.4E-04
4.6E-03*
4.6E-03*
2.9E-01*
3.9E-03*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data C JUN94) and curre-ersion of chemical data ( JUN96 ). ~ ndi c~ n~dous -tance-urre-rs i o[liiithemliii..dat a -96 )rtlJIII"' --..
ENVIRONMENTAL
A'i,XJC/AALAC
Freshwater saltwater
(ug/L) (Ug/l)
5.6E-02 5.6E-02*
11!!!!!1
----Page B-52
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Endotha l l
Enclrin
Endrin aldehyde
Endrin ketone••
Eth ion
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl benzene
Ethyl chloride
Ethyl ether
Ethyl methacrylate**
-
Ethyl methanesulfonate**
Ethyldipropylthiocarbamate, s-
Ethylene glycol
Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether
Ethylene thiourea**
Fenthion
Ferrous sulfate
fluoranthene
F luorene
CAS NITTber
..
MCL/MCLG
(mg/L)
000145-73·3 1.0E-01
000072-20-8 2.0E-03
007421-93-4
053494-70-5
000563-12-2
000141-78-6
000100-41-4 7.0E-01
000075-00-3
000060-29-7
000097-63·2
000062-50-0
000759-94-4
000107-21-1
000110-80-5
000096-45-7
000055-38-9
007720-78-7
000206-44-0
000086-73-7
.. .,. liiil
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING ~ATER
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
7.3E-01*
1.1E-02*
3.3E+01*
3. 7E+OO*
7.3E+00*
3.3E+OO
9.lE-01*
7.3E+01*
1.5E+01*
2.9E-03
1. SE+OO*
1. SE+OO*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
7.7E-04
FDAAL
(ppn)
•
liill .. -
FOOD CHAIN
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
<mg/kg)
2. 7E+01*
4.1E-01*
1.2E+03*
1 .4E+02*
z.7E+oz•
1. 2E+02
3.4E+01*
2. 7E+03*
5 .4E+02*
1.1E-01
5.4E+01*
5.4E+01*
Screen Cone
(mg/kg>
2.9E-02
• Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
0 Indicates new ·3rdous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
ENVIRONMENTAL
AI/OC/AALAC
Freshwater
(ug/L)
2.3E·03
•
Saltwater
(ug/L)
2.3E-03
•
Page B-53
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Fluorine
Formaldehyde
Formic acid
Furan
Furfural
Glycidylaldehyde
Heptachlor
lieptachlor epoxide
MCL/MCLG
CAS Number (mg/l)
007782-41 ,4
000050-00-0
000064-18-6
000110-00-9
000098-01-1
000765-34-4
000076-44-8 4.0E-04
001024-57-3 2.0E-04
Heptaclllorinat<?d C:ibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3,4 035822-46-9
Heptach l urinated di benzof ur·an, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 067562-39-4
Heptach l or i nated di benzofurar;,, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7 055673-89-7
Hexabromo~nzene 000087-82-1
Hexachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3,4, 039227-28-6
Hexachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3,6, 057653-85-7
Hexachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3,7, 019408-74-3
Hexachlorinated dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,4,7,8-070648-26-9
Hexachlorin::1ted dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,6,7,8-057117-44-9.
Hexachlorinated dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,7,8,9-072918-21-9
\ . 'j _,
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING ~ATER
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
2.ZE+OO*
7.3E+OO*
7.3E+01*
3. 7E-02*
1.lE-01*
1-5E-02*
1.BE-02*
4.7E-04*.
7.3E-02*
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
9.4E-06*
5.3E-08* ·
5.3E·09*
1.4E-08*
1.4E-08*
5.3E-09*
5.3E-09*
5.3E-09*
•
FDAAL
( ppm)
3.0E-01
3.0E-01
FOOD CHAIN
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg>
8.1E+01·:
2.7E+02*
2. 7E+03*
1.4E+OO*
4.1E+OO*
S.4E-01*
6.8E·01* .
1.BE-02*
2. 7E-t-00*
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
7.0E-04*
3.5E-04*
2.0E-06,,.
2.0E-06*
2.0E-07*
S.1E-07*
S.1E-07*
2.0E-07*
2.0E-07*
2.0E-07*
•
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical-data ( JUN94) and c~rrraversion of chemical data C JUN96 ) . .. Indi .. ~dous .. tanclililcurr1111ersi ... ch-datiiljN96 fflll' .. -11111
)
ENVIRONMENTAL
A!,JQC/AALAC
Freshwater Saltwater
(ug/l) (ug/L)
3.8E-03
3.8E·03*
-
3.E:SE-03*
--r
age B-54
CDH Data Version: JUN96
9 AUG 96
Substance Name
.. -liiil
HCL/HCLG
CAS Nunber (mg/L)
:exachlorinated dibenzofuran, 2,3,4,6,7,8-060851-34-5
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachtorocyclohexane, alpha-
Hexachlorocyclohexane, beta-
Hexachlorocyclohexane, delta-
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Hexachlorophene
Hexane
Hexanone, 2-**
Hydrazine
Hydrochloric acid
Hydrogen cyanide
Hydrogen sulfide
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
loxyni l
Iron
Isobutanol
000118-74-1 1.0E-03
000087-68-3
000319-84-6
000319-85-7
000319-86-8
000077-47·4 5.0E-02
000067-72·1
000070-30-4
000110-54-3
000591-78-6
000302-01-2
007647-01·0
000074-90·8
007783-06-4
000193·39-5
001689-83-4
007439-89-6
000078-83-1
.,. .. HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous·substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
OR INKING ~ATER
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
iiiil
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
FOAAL
(ppm)
2.9E-02*
7.3E·03*
2.6E-01*
3.7E·02*
1.1E-02*
2.2E+00*
7.3E-01*
1.1E-01*
1.1E+01*
5.3E·09*
5.3E-05*
1.1E-03*
1.4E·05*
4.7E-05*
6.1E-03*
2.8E·05*
1.2E·04*
-.. .. s ..
FOOD CHArn
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
1.1E+00*
2.?E·0.1*
Q. 5E+00*
1.4E+00*
4.1E-01*
8.1E+01*
2.7E+01*
4.1E+00*
4.1E+02*
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
2.0E-07*
2.0E-03*
4.0E-02*
5.0E-04*
1.8E-03*
2.3E-01,..
1.1E-03*
4.3E-03*
ENVIRONMENTAL
A\.IOC/AALAC
Freshwater Saltwater
(ug/L) (ug/L)
2.0E+00 2.0E+00
1.0E+03 1.0E+03
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
•• Indicates new 1---~qrdous s_ybstance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
l
Page B-55
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
lsophorone
KENZENE**
Kepone
Lead
Li ndane
MagnesilXTI
Malathion
Maleic anhydride
Maleic hydrazide
Manganese
Mercury
Methacrylonitrile
Methanol
Met horny I
Methoxychlor
Methyl chlorocarbonate
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methyl methacrylate
MCL/MCLG
CAS Number (mg/l)
000078-59-1
00000000000
000143-50-0
007439-92-1 1.5E-02
000058-89-9 2.0E-04
007439-95·4
000121-75-5
000108-31-6
000123-33-1
007439-96-5
007439-97-6 2.0E-03
000126-98-7
000067-56-1
016752-77-5
000072-43-5 4.0E-02
000079-22-1
000078-93-3
000108-10-1
000080-62-6
:,
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING ~ATER
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
7.3E+OO*
1.1E-02*
7.3E-01*
3.7E+OO*
1.BE+01*
5.1E+OO*
1. 1E-02*,
3.7E-03*
1.BE+01*
9.1E-01•
1.8E-01•
2.2E+01*
2.9E+OO*
2.9E+OO*
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
9.0E-02*
6.6E-05*
FOAAL
(ppm)
3.0E-01
1.0E+OO
FOOD CHAIN
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
2.7E+02*
4.1E-01*
2.7E+01*
1.4E+02*
6.8E+02*
1. 9E+02*
4.1E·01*
1.4E-01*
6.8E+02*
3.4E+01*
6.8E+OO*
_8.1E+02*
1.1E+02*
1.1E+02*
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
3.3E+00*
* .Ind!cates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and curre-ersion of chemical data ( JUN96 ). ~nd1c~netCtous -ance-urre-rs.ior.,them-ata 11111111196 )~ ~ -
ENVIRONMENT AL
AIIOC/AALAC
Freshwater
(ug/l)
3.2E+OO
8.0E-02
1. OE-01
1.2E-02
3.0E-02
Saltwater
( ug/L)
3. 2E+OO*
8.0E-02
1.0E·Ol
1.2E·02*
3.0E-02
-;:ge B-56
;;OH Data
9 AUG 96
-.-
Version: JUN96 --.. .,. liiiil
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING ~ATER
liiiil
FOOD CHAIN
Reference Dose Cancer Risk Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Substance Name
·~thylcholanthrene, 3-**
".f:!thylene bis (2-chloroani line), 4,4-
'.iethylene bromide**
Methylene chloride
Methylenediphenyl diisocyanate, 4,4-
Hethylnaphthalene, 2-
'1etribuzin
r-iirex
Molybdenum**
N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine**
·:-nit rosopi per i dine**
'laphthalene
~aphthylamine**
Nickel
Nitric acid
i-litric oxide
Nitroaniline, 2-**
;./itroaniline, 3-**
MCL/MCLG
CAS Number (mg/l)
000056-49-5
000101-14-4
000074-95-3
000075-09-2 5.0E-03
000101-68-8
000091-57-6
021087-64-9
002385-85-5
007439-98-7
000621-64-7
000100-75-4
000091-20-3
000091-59-8
007440-02-0
007697·37-2
010102·43-9
000088-74-4
000099-09-2
•
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
2.2E+OO*
9.1E-01*
7.3E·03•
1.8E-01
1.SE+OO*
•
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
6.6E-04*
1.1E-02•
•
1.2E·05
FDAAL
(ppn)
1.0E-01
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
9.SE·0.1*
8. 1E+01*
3.4E+01*
2.7E·01*
6.BE+OO
S.4E+01*
2.7E+01*
*
• Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ) .
** Indicates new·. ~rdous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
2.4E-02*
4.2E-01*
•
4.5E-04
s ..
EMVIRONMEt./TAL
AIIOC/AALAC
Freshwater Saltwater
(Ug/L) (Ug/L)
1.0E-03 1.0E-03
1.6E+02 1.6E+02*
Page B-57
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Nitroaniline, p-
N i trobenzene
Nitrogen dioxide
Nitroglycerine
Nitrophenol, 2-**
Nitrophenol, 4-
Nitroso-di·n·butylamine, N-
Nitroso·di-n·methylurethane, N-
Nitrosodiethanolamine, N·
Nitrosodiethylamine, N·
Nitrosodimethylamine, N·
Nitrosodiphenylamine, N-
Nitrosomethylethylamine**
Nitrosopyrrolidine, N·
Nitrotoluene, 4-
0ctamethylpyrophosphoramide**
Oxybis (1-chloropropane), 2,31 -**.
Parathion, ethyl·
MCL/MCLG
CAS Number (mg/l)
000100-01-6
000098-95-3
010102-44-0
000055-63-0
000088-75-5
000100-02-7
000079-46-9
000924-16-3
000615-53-2
001116-~4-7
000055-18-5
000062-75-9
000086-30-6
010595-95-6
000930-55-2
000099-99-0
000152-16-9
000108-60-1
000056-38-2
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING \./ATER
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
*
3.7E·01*
7.3E-02
2.2E-01*
Cancer
Screen
(mg/l)
Risk
Cone
1.6E-OS*
3.0E-05*
5.7E·07*
1.7E-06*
1.7E-02*
3.9E-06
4.1E-05*
FDAAL
(ppn)
FOOO CHAIN
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg>
6.BE-01*
1.4E+01*
2.7E+OO
8.1E+00*
*
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
5.BE-04*
1.lE-03*
2.lE-05*
6.2E·05*
6.4E-01*
1.4E-04
1.5E·03*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and cu~re ersion of ** Indicates n~zardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
chemical data ( JUN96 ).
I!!!!~~·--11!111 ----· ..
ENVIRONMENTAL
A\.IOC/AALAC
Freshwater Saltwater
(ug/L) (Ug/l)
1.3E·02* 1.3E-02*
--.-Page B-58
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
--- -.. iiiil
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING ~ATER
liiiil liiil .. --
FOOD CHAIN
Reference Dose Cancer Risk Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Substance Name
Parathion, methyl-
PCBs
MCL/MCLG
CAS Nl.lTDer (mg/l)
000298-00-0
001336-36·3 5.0E-04
Pentachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3,7 040321-76-4
Pentachlorinated dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,7,8-109719-77-9
Pentachlorinated dibenzofuran, 2,3,4,7,8-057117-41-6
Pentachlorobenzene 000608-93-5
Pentachloroethane 000076-01-7
Pentachloronitrobenzene 000082-68-8
Pentachlorophenol 000087-86-5 1 .OE-03
Phenanthrene 000085-01·8
Phenol 000108-95-2
Phenyl sulfide 000139-66-2
Phenylenediamine, m-** 000108-45-2
Phenylmercuric acetate 000062-38-4
Phorate 000298-02·2
Phosgene 000075-44-5
Phosphamidon 013171 -21-6
Phosphine 007803-51-2
Phosphonodithioic acid, phenyl-o-ethyl-o-( 002104-64-5
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
9.lE-03*
7.3E-04*
2.9E·02*
1. lE-01*
1.1E+OO*
2.ZE+Ol*
2.2E·01
2.9E-03*
7.3E·03*
1. lE-02*
3.?E-04*
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
1.lE-05*
1.lE-09*
1.1E-08*
1. lE-09"'
3.3E-04*
7. lE-04*
FDAAL
(ppm)
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
3.4E-01*
2.?E-02*
1.1E+00*
4.1E+00*
4.1E+01•
8.1E+02*
8.1E+OO
1.lE-01*
2. ?E-01*
4.1E-01*
1.4E-02*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
"'* Indicates new 1--.,._ardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
4.lE-04*
3.9E-08*
3. 9E ·07*
3.9E·OB*
1.ZE-02*
2.6E-02*
-11
ENVIRONMENTAL
A',JOC/AALAC
Freshwater Saltwater
(ug/L) (ug/L)
1.4E-02
1.3E+01 1.3E+01
1.0E-0P· 1.0E-01*
Page 8·59
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Phosphorit: acid
Phosphorous (elemental)
Phthalic anhydride
Plutoniun
Polychlorineted triphenyl
Potassiun**
Potassiun silver cyanide
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyridi_ne
Quinol_ ine
; Radium
Radon
Resorcinol
Ronnel
Sa fro le**
Seleniun
Selen1Jurea
MCL/MCLG
CAS Number ·cnig/L)
007664-38-2
007723-14-0
000085-44·9
007440-07-5
012642-23·8
007440-09-7
000506-61·6
023950-58-5
000129-00-0
000110-86-1
000091-22 · 5
007440-14-4
010043-92·2
000108-46-3
000299-84-3
000094-59-7
007782-49·2 5.0E-02
000630-10·4
.<)
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DR INK I NG \.JATER
Reference Dose cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
7.3E·04•
7.3E+01*
7.3E+00*
2. 7E+OO*
1.1E+OO*
1.BE+OO*
1.8E·01•
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
7.1E-06*
FDAAL
(ppm)
FOOD CHAIN
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
2. 7E-02•
2.7E+03*
2.7E+02*
1. OE+02*
4. 1E+01*
1.4E+00*
6.8E+01*
6.BE+OO*
6.BE+OO*
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
2.6E·04*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and curren-rsiori of chemical data ( JUN96 ). ~ndic~ecous =ance~urre~sion~hemi-ata ... 6 ).rJ!!!il' .. 111!1 111111 ..
ENVIRONMENTAL
A\/OC/AALAC
Freshwater
(ug/l)
1.0E-01
-5.0E+OO*
111!!!!!1
Saltwater
(ug/L)
1 .OE-01
5.0E+OO*
11!!!!!!!1
--r
Page B-60
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
------.,. liiiil
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DR !HK I NG ~ATER
iiii] liill iiii] iiiiil
FOOO CHAIN
Reference Dose Cancer Risk Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Substance Name
Silver
Silver Cyanide
Sodil.lTI
Strontiun
Strychnine
Styrene
Sulfuric acid
TB, 2,4.-5-
TCOO
Tetrachlorobenzene, 1,2,4,5-
Tetrachlorodibenzofuran, 2,3,7,8-
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2-
Tetrachloroethane, 1, 1,2,2-
Tetrachloroethylene
Tetrachlorophenol, 2,3,4,6·
Tetraethyl lead
Tetraethyld!thiopyrophosphate
Tetrahydrofuran
Thalliun
MCL/MCLG
CAS Number (mg/L)
007440-22-4
000506-64-9
007440-23-5
007440-24-6
000057-24-9
000100-42-5 1.0E-01
007664-93-9
000093-80-1
001746-01-6 3.0E-08
000095-94-3
051207-31-9
000630-20-6
000079-34-5
000127-18-4 5.0E-03
000058-90-2
000078-00-2
003689-24-5
000109-99-9
007440-28.-0 5.0E-04
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
1.BE-01*
3.7E+OO*
2.2E+01*
1.1E-02*
7 .3E+OO*
1.1E·02*
1.1E+OO*
3.7E·01*
1.1E+OO*
3.?E-06*
1.BE-02*
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
5.3E-10*
5.3E-09*
3.3E-03'
4.3E-04'
1.6E-03*
FDAAL
(ppm)
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
6.BE+OO*
1.4E+02*
R.1E+02*
4.1E-01*
2. 7E+02*
4. lE-01*
4.1E+01*
1.4E+01*
4.1E+01*
1.4E-04*
6.BE-01*
• Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
** Indicates new~ ·1rdous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
2.0E-08*
2.0E-07"'
1.6E-02*
6.1E-02*
iiii] s
ENVIRONMENTAL
A't,JOC/AALAC
Freshwater Saltwater
(Ug/l) (ug/l)
4.lE+OO* 4.1E+00*
Page B-61
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Thiourea
Thi ram
Toluene
Toluene di isocyanate
Toluenediamine, 2,4-**
Toluidine, o-0
Toluidine, p-**
Toxaphene
TP, 2,4,5-
Tribromomethane
Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane, 1, 1,2-
T rich l orobenzene, 1, 2, 4-
Trichloroethane, 1,1,1-
Trichloroethane, 1,1,2-
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trichlorophenol, 2,3,5-
Tr·ichlorophenol, 2,3,6-
Trichlorophenol, 2,4,5-
MCL/MCLG
CAS Number (mg/l)
000062-56-6
000137-26-8
000108-88-3 1.0E•OO
000584-84-9
000095-80-7
000095-53-4
000106-49-0
008001'35-2 3.0E-03
000093-72-1 5.0E-02
000075-25-2 1.0E-01*
000076-13-1
000120-82-1 7.0E-02
000071-55-6 2.0E-01
000079-00-5 3.0E-03
000079-01-6 5.0E-03
000075-69-4
000933-78-8
000933-75-5
000095-95-4
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
· Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING SATER
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
1.BE-01*
7.3E+OO*
2.9E-01*
7.3E-01*
1. 1 E+03*.
3.?E-01*
1.5E-01*
1.1E+01*
3.7E+OO*
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
2.7E-05
4.5E-04
7.?E-05*
FDAAL
(ppn)
*
FOOD CHAIN
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
6.BE+OO*
2.7E+02*
1.1E+01*
2.1eio1•
4.1E-+04*
1.4E+Ol*
5.4E+OO*
4.1E+02*
1.4E+02*
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
9.8E-04
1.?E-02
2.9E·03*
5.SE-02*
2.9E·01*
* Indicat~s difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and cur;,e rsion of chemical data ( JUN96 ). ** Indicates nevAi-ardous substance in current version of chemi~ata ~96) -
l!!!!!!!I 11!!!!!!11 'l!9III ------
.. .. 111111
ENVIRONMENT AL
All<lC/AALAC
freshwater
(ug/L)
Saltwater
(ug/LJ
2.0E-04
lliil r
Page B-62
SCDH Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-
Trichlorophenol, 3,4,5-
Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2,4,5-
Trichloropropane, 1,2,3-
Triethanolamine
Tri flural in
Trinitrobenzene, 1,3,5-
Trinitrotoluene
Tris (2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate
Vanadium
Vanadium pentoxide
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
\.larfarin
Xylene, m-
Xyl~ne, o-
Xylene, p-
Zinc
-
CAS Nuroer
000088-06-2
000609-19-8
000093-76-5
000096-18-4
000102-71-6
001582-09-8
000099-35-4
000118-96-7
.000126-72-7
-
MCL/MCLG
(mg/l)
007440-62-2
001314-62-1
000108-05-4
000075-01-4 2.0E-03
000081-81-2
000108-38-3 1.0E+01
000095-47-6 1.0E+01
000106-42-3 1.0E+01
007440-66-6
-.,. liiiil
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING ~ATER
iiiil
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
FDAAL
(ppm)
3.7E-01*
2.2E-01*
2.?E-01*
1.8E-03*
1.8E-02*
2.6E-01*
3.3E·01*
3.7E+01*
1.1E-02*
7.3E+01*
7.3E+01*
1 .1E+01*
7.?E-03*
1.1E-02*
2.BE-03*
4.SE-05*
liiiil
FOOD CHAIN
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
1.4E+01*
8.1E+00*
1.0E+01*
6.8E-02*
6.BE-01*
9. 5E+00*
1.2E+01*
1.4E+03*
4.1E-01*
2.7E+03*
2.7E+03*
4.1E+02*
Screen Cone
Cmg/kg)
2.9E-01*
4.SE-04*
4. lE-01*
1.1E-01*
1.7E-03*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ). ** Indicates new' ,rdous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
··;·· .
-11
ENVIRONMENTAL
AI/OC/AALAC
Freshwater
C ug/l)
1. 1E+02
Saltwater
C ug/L)
1. lE-+02*
Page B-63
SCDM Data
19 AUG 96
Version: JUN96
Substance Name
Zinc cyanide
Zinc phosphide
Zinc sulfate
MCL/MCLG
CAS Number (mg/l)
000557-21-1
001314-84-7
007733-02-0
'.~.,
· .. \
HAZARD RA,· .. :~~;G SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
DRINKING \.JATER
., Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/l)
1.BE+OO*
1.1E-02*
Screen Cone
(mg/L)
FDAAL
(ppm)
FOOD CHAIN
Reference Dose Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg>
6.BE+01*
4.1E-01*
Screen Cone
(mg/kg>
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 }.
~lrdi:: neazardous=tanc~curr;;rsio~chem;.;.data~96 >J ..
1111!!!!!1
)
ENVIRONMENTAL
A'i,JQC/AALAC
Freshwater Saltwater
(ug/l) (ug/L)
111!!!!!!!1
iiii -r
Page B-64
SCOM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG.96
Substance Name
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Acetonitri le
Acetophenone
Acetyl-2-thiourea, 1-
Acrolein
Acrylamide
Acrylic acid
Acryloni tri le
Adipic acid
Aldicarb
Aldrin
Al lyl alcohol
Allyl chloride••
Aluninum
Aluninun phosphide
Arnnonia
-----lilll
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Nunber (mg/kg)
000083-32·9 4.7E+03•
000208-96-8
000075-07-0
000067-64-1 7.8E+03*
000075-05·8 4.7E+02*
000098-86·2 7.8E+03•
000591-08-2
000107-02·8 1.6E+03*
000079-06-1 1.6E+01*
000079-10·7 3.9E+04*
000107-13-1 7.8E+01*
000124-04-9
000116-06-3 7.8E+01*
000309-00-2 2.3E+OO*
000107-18·6 3.9E+02*
000107-05-1
007429-90-5
020859-73-8 3.1E+01*
007664-41-7 7.6E+04*
SOIL PATH~AY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
1. 2E+OO*
3.8E-02*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
•• Indicates new ~~~ardous substance in current version· of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
liilll iiii! liiil s ..
Page B-65
SCOM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Arrmonium picrate
Arrmoniun sulfamate
Aniline
Anthracene
Antimony
Arsenic
Asbestos
Atrazine
Azinphos-ethyl
Azinphos-methyl
Aziridine
Barium
Barilftll cyanide
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzene
Benzene carbonyl chloride
Benzi dine
Benzo(a)pyrene
:_:,
HAZARl;I RA1. '._,.:..,G SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Number (mg/kg)
000131-74-8
007773-06-0 1.6E+04*
000062-53-3
000120-12-7 2.3E+04*
007440·36·0 3.1E+01*
007440-38-2 2.3E+01*
001332-21-4
001912-24-9 2. 7E+03*
002642-71-9
000086-50°0
000151-56-4
007440-39-3 5.SE+03*
000542-62-1 •
000056-55-3
000071-43-2
000098-88-4
000092-87-5 2.3E+02*
000050-32-8
SOIL PATH\.IAY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
<mg/kg)
1.1E+02*
4.3E-01*
2.9E+OO*
8.BE-01*
2.2E+01*
2.BE-03*
8.BE-02*
version of * Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current
** Indicates new hazardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96
=9~
) .• chemical data ( JUN96 ).
111!!1 . .., --1111111
liilii
Page B-66
SCOH Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzoic acid
Benzonitrile
Benzothiazole, 1,2,-
Benzyl alcohol**
Benzyl chloride
Beryll iU'll
Biphenyl, 1,1-
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
-
Bis( 2 -ch·l oroi sopropyl )ether**
Bis(chloromethyt)ether
Boron
Bromodichloromethane
Bromomethane
Bromophenyl-phenylether, 4-**
----HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS NUTiber (mg/kg)
000205-99-2
000191-24-2
000207-08-9
000065-85-0 3.1E+05*
000100-47-0
000095-16-9
000100-51-6 2.3E•04
000100-44-7
007440-41-7 3.9E+02*
000092-52-4 3.9E+03*
000117-81-7 1.6E+03*
000111-91-1
000111-44-4
039638-32-9 3.1E+03
000542-88-1
007440-42-8 7.0E+03*
000075-27-4 1.6E+03*
000074-83-9 1.1E+02*
000101-55-3
SOIL PATH~AY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
8.8E+OO*
3.8E+OO*
1.SE-01*
4.6E+01*
5.BE-01*
9.lE+OO
2.9E-03*
1.0E+01*
..
• lndicates·difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
•• Indicates new h~7 ardous substance in current version of chemical data C JUN96 ).
iiiliil liiiil
Page 8-67
SCDM Data Version: .. jUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Bromoxyni l
Butadiene, 1,3-
Butanol
Butylbenzyl phthalate
Butyric acid, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)
Cadmium
Calcium**
Captan
Carb.:Jryl
Carbaz.ole"'*
Carbofuran
Carbon,disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Carbophenothion
Ces i un
Chloral
Chlordane
Chlordane, alpha-**
Chlordane, garrma-~*
' .,\
HAZARD RAk _ _..,J SYSTEM
tlazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Number (mg/kg)
001689-84-5 1.6E+03*
000106-99-0
000071-36-3 7.8E+03*
000085-68-7 1.6E+04*
000094-82-6 6.3E+02*
007440-43-9 3.9E+01*
007440-70-2
000133-06-2 1. OE+04*
000063-25-2 7.8E+03*
000086-74-8
001563-66-2 3.9E+02*
000075-15-0 7.8E+03*
000056-23-5 5.5E+01*
000786-19-6
007440-46-2
000075-87-6 1.6E+02*
000057-74-9 _4.7E+OO*
005103-71-9
005566-34-7
S01 l PATH~AY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
1.8E+02*
3.2E+01
4.9E+OO*
4.9E-01*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
~roic~n•.;ous ;;•nce~urre:.;;sio~hemi;.;ata ~96 )~ .. IIII -lll!!I
)
1111111 -
--.->age B-68
iCOM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Chlorine cyanide
Chloro-3-methylphenol, 4-
Chloroaniline, p-
Ch l orobenzene
Chlorobenzilate**
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Chloromethyl methyl ether
Chloromethyloxirane, 2-
-
Chloronaphthalene, 2-
Chlorophenol, 2-
Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether, 4-**
Chloroprene**
Chlorpyri fos
Chromillll
Chromiun( I 11)
Chromiun(VI)
Chrysene
-----,.-lilil
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Hunber (mg/kg)
000506·77·4 3.9E+03*
000059-50-7 1.6E+05*
000106·47·8 3.1E+02*
000108-90·7 1.6E+03*
000510-15·6 1.6E+03
000067-66·3 7.8E+02*
000074-87-3
000107-30·2
000106-89·8 1 .6E+02*
000091-58-7 6.3E+03*
000095-57-8 3.9E+02*
007005-72·3
000126-99·8
002921-88·2 2 .3E+02*
007440-47·3 3.9E+02*
016065-83·1 7 .8E+04*
018540-29·9 3.9E+02*
000218-01·9
SOIL PATHi.JAY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
2.4E+OO
1.0E+02*
4.9E+01*
6.5E+01*
8.8E+01*
iiiil
Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ) .
0 Indicates new h_:01.ardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
•
\ J
lliilil liiil iiiil
Page B-69
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Cobalt
Copper
Copper cyanid~
Counaphos
Creosote
Cresol, m-
Cresol, o-**
Cresol, p-
t:umene
Cyan-nine
Cyanide
Cyanogen
Cyanogen bromide
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanone
Cyclotrimethylenetrinitriamine
ODD
DOE
ODi
'· . i
HAZARD Rh •..• ,JG SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks.
376 Substances
., ' Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Number (mg/kg)
007440-48-4
007440-50-8
000544-92-3 3.9E+02*
000056-72-4
008001-58-9
000108-39-4 3.9E+03*
000095-48-7 3.9E+03
000106-44-5 3.9E+02*
000098-82-8 3.1E+03*
021725-46-2 1.6E+02*
000057-12-5 1.6E+03*
000460-19-5 3.1E+03*
000506-68-3 7.0E+03*
000110-82-7
000108-94-1 3.9E+05*
000121-82-4 2.3E+D2*
000072-54-8
000072-55-9
000050-29-3 3.9E+01*
SOIL PATH\.JAY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
Crng/kg)
5.8E+OO*
2.?E+OO*
1. 9E+OO*
1.9E+OO*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) ancfcurrent version of chemical data (
~Iooi= n.dou~tanc~curr~ersi;.; ch•-:. data;.;.N96 ~ .. -11!!!!!!!!1
JUN96 ). --11!!!!!!!!1 -& -
--r
Page B-70
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
DEF
Di-n-butyt phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Dial late**
Diazinon
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Oibenzofuran
-
Dibromo-3-chloropropane, 1,2-
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromoethane, 1,2-
Dicamba
0ichlorobenzene, 1,2-
Dichlorobenzene, 1,3-
Dichlorobenzene, 1,4-
Dichlorobenzidine, 3,3-
Dichtorodifluoromethane
Dichloroethane, 1, 1-
0ichloroethane, 1,2-
Dichloroethylene, 1, 1-
-----HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS NlX!ber (mg/kg)
000078-48-8 2.3E+00*
000084-74-2 7.8E+03*
000117-84-0 1.6E+03*
002303-16-4
000333-41-5 7.0E+01*
000053-70-3
000132-64-9
000096-12-8
000124-48-1 1.6E+03*
000106-93-4
001918-00-9 2.3E+03*
000095-50-1 7.0E+03*
000541-73-1
000106-46-7
000091-94-1
000075-71-8 1.6E+04*
000075-34-3 7.8E+03*
000107-06-2
000075-35-4 7.0E+02*
SOIL PATH~AY·
Cancer Risk:
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
1.0E+Ol
8.8E-02•
7.6E+OO*
7.SE-03*
2.7E+01*
1.4E+00*
7.0E+OO*
1.1E+OO*
liiil
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
** Indicates new ~-~ardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
liiil iiill
Page B-71 -----· SCOH Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2·
Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2·
Dichlorophenol, 2,4-
Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2,4·
Dichloropropane, 1,2·
Oichloroprvpene, 1,3·
Dichloropropene, cis-1,3·**
Dichloropropene, trans· ·1 ,3·*•
-., ...
) HAZARD RA·, .. __ _,G SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Nunber (mg/kg)
000156-59-2 7.8E+02*
000156-60·5 1.6E+03*
000120-83-2 2.3E+02*
· 000094-75-7 7.8E+02*
000078-87-5
000542-75-6 2.3E+01*
010061-01-5
010061-02'6
SOIL PATH\.JAY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg>
9.4E+OO*
3.6E+OO*
Dichlcrvos 2.2E+O 000062-73-7 3.9E+01*
Dicofol
Dieldrin
Diethyl phthalate
Diethylene glycol
Diethylstibestrol**
Oiisopropylmethyl-phosphonate
Dimethoate
Dimethoxybenzidinc, 3,3·
Dimethyl phenol, 2,4·
000115-32-2
000060-57-1 3.9E+OO* 4.0E-02* :
000084-66-2 6.3E+04*
000111-46-6
000056-53-1 1.4E-04
001445-75-6 6.3E+03*
000060-51-5 1.6E+01*
000119-90-4 4;6E+01*
000105-67-9 1.6E+03*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ). ** Indicates new hazardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96
I!!!!!!! ~--.. -.. 11!!!!!!!!1 l!!!!!!I ..
--r
Page e-72
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Dimethyl phthalate
-
Dimethyl sulfate
Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, 7, 12-**
Dimethylbenzidine, 3,31 -**
Dinitro-2-methylphenol, 4,6-**
Dini trobenzene, 1,3-
Dini trophenol, 2,4-
Dinitrotoluene, 2,4-
Dinitrotoluene, 2,6-
Dinoseb
Dioxane, 1,4-
Dioxathion
Diphenylamine**
0iphenylhydrazine, 1 ,2-
Diquat
Oi:-ul foton
Diuron
Endosulfan (I or II)
Endosulfan sulfate
------HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Nunber (mg/kg)
000131-11-3 *
000077-78-1
000057-97-6
000119-93-7
000534-52-1
000099-65-0 7.8E+OO*
000051-28-5 1.6E+02*
000121-14·2 1.6E+02*
000606-20-2 7.BE+Ol*
000088-85·7 7.8E+01*
000123-91·1
000078-34-2
000122-39-4 2.0E+03
000122-66·7
000085-00-7 1. 7E+02*
000298-04-4 3.1E+00*
000330-54-1 1.6E+02*
000115-29-7 4.7E+02*
001031-07·8
SOIL PATH~AY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg>
7.0E-02
9.4E-01*
9.4E-01*
5.8E+01*
8.oe-01•
..
* indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current
•• Indicates new 1.-7.ardous substance in current version of ch~rnical data ( JUN96 ).
version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
\
_j
iilil lliiil liiil 11
Page B-73
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Endothal l
Endrin
Endr in aldehyde
Endrin ketone**
Ethi on
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl benzene
Ethyl chloride
Ethyl ether
Ethyl methacrylate**
Ethyl methanesulfonate**
Ethyldipropylthiocar~amat~, s-
Ethylene glycol
Ethylene glycol i:oonoethyl ether
Ethylene thiourea**
Fenthion
Ferrous sulfate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
) HAZARD RAI. __ ,<G SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Nunber (mg/kg)
000145-73-3 1.6E+03*
000072-20-8 2.3E+01*
007421-93-4
053494-70-5
000563-12-2 3.9E+01*
000141-78-6 7.0E+04*
000100-41-4 7.8E+03*
000075-00-3
000060-29-7 1.6E+04*
000097-63-2 7 .OE+03
000062-50-0
000759-94-4 2.0E+03*
000107-21-1 1.6E+0S*
000110-80-5 3.1E+04*
000096-45-7 6.3E+OO
000055-38-9
007720-78-7
000206-44-0 3.1E+03*
000086-73-7 3.1E+03*
SOIL PA TH\..JAY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(rilg/kg)
5.8E+OO
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and current version of ~ndi= nei:dous =tanc~urre;.;rsio;.;.chem;.data ~N96 )~ -
chemical data ( JUN96 ). -.. 11!!!!!!!!1 11!!!!!!!!1
----Page B-74
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Fluorine
Formaldehyde
Formic acid
Furan
Furfural
Glycicl/laldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
--
Heptachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3
Heptachlorinated dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,4,6
Heptachtorinated dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,4,6
Hexabromobenzene
Hexachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3,
Hexachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3,
Hexachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,2,3,
Hcxachlorinated dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,4,7,
Hexachlorinated dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,6,7,
Hexachlorinated dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,7,8,
-.. HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS NUTiber (mg/kg)
007782-41-4 4.7E+03*
000050-00-0 1.6E+04*
000064·18·6 1.6E+05*
000110·00·9 7.8E+01*
000098·01-1 2.3E+02*
000765·34·4 3.1E+01*
000076· 44 · 8 3.9E+01*
001024·57·3 1.0E+OO*
035822·46·9
067562·39-4
055673·89-7
000087-82-1 1.6E+02*
039227·28-6
057653·85-7
019408·74-3
070648·26·9
057117·44·9
072918-21-9
SOIL PATH\.IAY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
1.4E-01*
4.0E-04*
4.0E-04*
4.0E-05*
1.0E-04'
1.0E-04*
4.0E-05*
•
liiil ..
• Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ) .
** Indicates new ~-~ardous substance in current version of chemical data C JUN96 ).
11111 lliil liiilil liiil
Page B-75
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Hexachlorinated dibenzofuran, 2,3,4,6,7,
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclohexane, alpha-
Hexach l orocyc_l ohexane, beta-
Hexach l orocyc l ohexane, delta-
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Hexach l orophe11e
Hexane
Hexanone, 2·**
Hydrazine
Hydrochloric acid
Hydrogen cyanide
Hydrogen sulfide
Ir.deno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Ioxyni l
Iron
Isobutanol
HAZARD RA~,~-i,J' SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchffiarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Number (mg/kg)
060851-34-5
000118-74-1 6.3E+01*
000087-68-3 1.6E+01*
000319-84-6
000319-85-7
000319-86-8
000077-47-4 5.5E+02*
000067-72-1 '7 .8E+01*
000070-30-(-2.3E+01*
000110-54-3 4. 7E+03*
000591-78-6
000302-01-2
007647-01-0
000074-90-8 1.6E+03*
007783-06-4 2.3E+02*
000193'39-5
001689-83-4
007439-89-6
000078-83-1 2.3E+04*
SOIL PATH\.JAY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
4:0E-01*
8.2E+OO*.
1.0E-01*
3.6E-01*
4.6E+01*
2. lE-01*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of ~roic;.n•cous =•nce~urre~sion~hemi;.:ata ~96 Ji,,# .. chemical data ( JUN96 ).
!
111!!1
liii .... Page B-76
SCOH Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Jsophorone
KENZENE**
Kepoi,e
lead
Li ndane
Magnesium
Malathion
Haleic anhydride
Haleic hydrazide
Manganese
Mercury
Hethacrylonitrile
Methanol
Methomyl
Hethoxychlor
Methyl chlorocarbonate
Methyl ethyl ketone
"ethyl isobutyl ketone
Methyl methacrylate
----HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Nunber (mg/kg)
000078-59-1 1.6E+04*
00000000000
000143-50-0
007439-92-1
000058-89-9 2.3E+01*
007439-95-4
000121-75-5 1.6E+03*
000108-31-6 7.8E+03*
000123-33-1 3.9E+04*
007439-96-5 1.1E+04*
007439-97-6 2.3E+01*
000126-98-7 7.BE+OO*
000067-56-1 3.9E+04*
016752-77-5 2.0E+03*
000072-43-5 3.9E+02*
000079-22-1
000078-93-3 4. 7E+04*
000108-10-1 6.3E+03*
000080-62-6 6.3E+03*
SOIL PATH\.IAY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
6. 7E+02*
4.9E-01*
lliil
• Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current·version of chemical data ( JUN96 ) .
** Indicates new ~~~ardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
-
Page B-77
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Methylcholanthrene, 3-**
Methylene bis (2-chloroaniline), 4,4-
Methylene bromide**
Methylene chloride
Methylenediphenyl diisocyanate, 4,4-
Methylnaphthalene, 2-
Metribuzin
Mi rex
Mo l Ybdenun**
N-nitrosopiperidine**
Naphthalene
Maphthylamine**
Mickel
Mitric acid
Nitric oxide
Mitroaniline, 2-**
Mitroaniline, 3-**
)
HAZARD RA!-., .. -~G SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Number (mg/kg)
000056·49·5
000101·14·4 5.SE+01*
000074-95·3
000075-09·2 4. 7E+03*
000101-68-8
000091-57·6
021087-64·9 2.0E+03*
002385-85-5 1.6E+01*
007439-98-.7 3.9E+02
000621 ·64· 7 .
000100-75-4
000091-20-3 3.1E+03*
000091-59·8
007440·02·0 1.6E+03*
007697-37·2
010102-43-? · •
000088-74·4
000099-09·2
SOIL PATH'.IAY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
4.9E+OO*
8.SE+01*
•
9.1E·02
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and current version of
~ooic;; n•wzardous ~tance~urre;.;;rsio~chem;.:ata ~96 Ji.# .. chemical data ( JUN96 ). .. 111!!!!!1 11!1!!!1 11!1!!!1
----Page B-78
SCOH Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Nitroaniline, p-
Nitrobenzene
Nitrogen dioxide
Nitroglycerine
Nitrophenol, 2-**
Nitrophenol, 4-
Nitropropane, 2-**
-
Nitroso-di-n-butylamine, N-
Nitroso-di-n-methylurethane, N-
Nitrosodiethanolamine, N·
Ni~rosodiethylamine, N-
Nitrosodimethylamine, N-
Nitrosodiphenylamine, N·
Nitrosomethylethylamine**
Nitrosopyrrolidine, N-
Nitrotoluene, 4-
0ctamethylpyrophosphoramide**
Oxybis (1-chloropropane), 2,3 1-••
Parathion, ethyl-
-----HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Nurber (mg/kg)
D00100-01·6
000096-95-3 3.9E+01*
010102-44·0
000055-63-0
000088-75-5
000100-02-7
000079-46-9
000924-16·3
000615-53·2
001116-54-7
000055 · 1 B· 5
000062-75-9
000086-30·6
010595-95-6
000930-55·2
000099-99-0 7.BE+02*
000152-16-9 1.6E+02
00010B-60·1
000056-3B-2 4.7E+02*
•
SOIL PATH~AY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
1.ZE-01*
2.3E-01*
4.3E-03*
1.3E-02*
1.3E+02*
2.9E-02
3.0E-01*
llill
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
•• Indicates new hRzardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
'i
lililil .. s iii)
Page B-79
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Parathion, n~thyl-
PCBs
Pentachlorinated dibenzo-p-diox_in, 1,2,3
Pentachlorinated dibenzofuran, 1,2,3,7,8
Pentachlorinated dibenzofuran, 2,3,4,7;8
Prntachlorobenzene
Pent~chloroethane
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Phenyl ~ul fide
Phenylenediamine, m-**
Phenylmercuric acetate
Phorate-
Phosgene
Phosphamidon
Phosphine
Phosphonodithioic acid, phenyl-o-ethyl-o
.·. ·.· . i
HAZARD RA,, .... _:-,u SYSTEM
Hazardous·substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
_,:
!'.;AS NUITber
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
000298-00-0 2.0E+01*
001336-36-3 1.6E+OO*
040321-76-4
109719-77-9
057117-41-6
000608-93-5 6.3E+01*
000076-01-7
000082-68-8 2.3E+02*
000087-86-5 2.3E+03*
000085-0.1-8
000108-95-2 4.7E+04*
000139°66-2
000108-45-2 4.7E+02
000062-38-4 6.3E+OO*
000298-02-2 1.6E+01*
000075-44-5
013171-21.-6
007803-51-2 2.3E+01*
002104-64-5 7.8E-01*
SOIL PATH\.IAY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
8.0E-05*
8.0E-06*
2.SE+OO*
5.3E+OO*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of ~looi= n.;dous=tanc~curr:.;rsio;.chem;;.d•t•m:.;N96 ~ [1111
chemical data ( JUN96 ).
l!l!!l!I 111!1!!1
)
l!!!!!!!!I
----Page B-80
SCOH Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Phosphoric acid
Phosphorous (elemental)
Phthalic anhydride
Plutoniun
Polychlor:inated triphenyl
Pot ass i un**
Potassiun silver cyanide
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyridine
Cuinol ine
Radium
Radon
Resorc inol
Rennet
Safrole**
Selenil.m
Sclenourea
----HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Nunber (mg/kg)
007664·38·2
007723·14·0 1.6E+00*
000085·44·9 1.6E+05*
007440-07·5
012642·23·8
007440·09·7
000506·61·6 1.6E+04*
023950:58·5 5.9E+03*
000129·00·0 2.3E+03*
000110-86·1 7.8E+01*
000091·22·5
007440·14·4
010043·92·2
000108·46·3
000299·84·3 3.9E+03*
000094·59·7
007782-49·2 3.9E+02*
000630·10·4 3.9E+02*
SOIL PATH~AY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
5.3E-02*
iiiiiil liilil
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
•• Indicates ne~ ·ardous substance in current version of chemical data C JUN96 ).
liiill iiiil iiiil ..
Page B-81
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Silver
Si tver Cyanide
Sodiun
StrontiUTI
Strychnine
Styrene
Sulfuric acid
TB, 2,4,5·
TCDO
Tetrachlorobenzene, 1,2.4,5·
Tetrachlorodibenzofuran, 2,3,7,8·
Tetrachloroethane, 1, 1, 1,2·
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2·
Tetrachloroethylene
Tetrachlorophenol, 2,3,4,6·
Tetraethyl lead
Tetraethyldithiopyrophosphate
Tetrahydrofuran
Th:1lliun
\ I HAZARD .RAh .. ~:--1 SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Number (mg/kg)
007440·22·4 3.9E+02'
000506-64·9 7.8E+03'
007440-23·5
007440-24·6 4.7E+04'
000057·24·9 2.3E+01'
000100-42·5 1.6E+04'
007664-93·9
000093 ·80· 1·
001746-01·6
000095-94·3 2.3E+01*
051207-31·9
000630·20·6 2.3E+03*
000079-34·5
000127.· 18·4 7 .8E+02*
000058-90·2 2.3E+03*
000078-00·2 7.8E-03*
003689•24,5 3.9E,01*
000109·99·9
007440-28·0
SOIL PATH\.JAY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
4.0E-06*
4.0E:::-05*
2.5E+01*
3.2E+OO*
1.2E+01*
• Indicates
** Indicates
difference between previous version of chemical .data ( JUN94) and current version of.chemical data ( JUN96 }.
ncrdou~stanc~ curr~ersi~ ch~ dat~N96 '(JI -!!!! I!!!!!!!!! .. 11!!1!!!1 ...
Page B-82
SCDM Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Thi ourea
Thi ram
Toluene
Toluene di isocyanate
Toluenediamine, 2,4-**
Toluidine, o-**
Toluidine, p·**
Toxaphene
TP, 2,4,5-
liiil liiiiil
T r i bromomethane
Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane, 1, 1,2-
Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-
Trichloroethane, 1,1,1-
Trichloroethane, 1,1,2-
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trichlorophenol, 2,3,5-
Trichlorophenol, 2,3,6-
1richlorophenol, 2,4,5-
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Nunber (mg/kg)
000062-56-6
000137-26-8 3.9E+02*
000108-88-3 1.6E+04*
000584-84-9
000095-80-7
000095-53-4
000106-49-0
008001-35-2
000093-72-1 6.3E+02*
000075-25-2 1.6E+03*
000076-13-1 2.3E+06*
000120-82-1 7.8E+02*
000071-55-6
000079-00-5 3.1E+02*
00.0079-0l-6
000075-69-4 2.3E+04*
000933-78-8
000933-75-5
000095-95-4 7.8E+03*
SOIL PATH~AY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
2.0E-01
3.4E+OO
5.BE-01*
8.1E+01*
1. 1E+01*
5.8E+01*
~ Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 )._
** Indicates ne· ~ardous substance in current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
.. --s iiiiil
Page B-83
SCDH Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-
Trichlorophenol, 3,4,5-
Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2,4,5-
Trichloropropane, 1,2,3-
Triethanolamine
Triflura\ ir.
Tri nit robenzene, 1, 3 ,' 5-
T r i nit roto luene
Tris (2,3-dibromopropyl) phos~iate
Vanadiun
Vanadiun pentoxide
_Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
Warfarin
Xylene, m-
Xylene, o-
Xylene, p-
Zinc
i HAZARD RAN, ... ..i SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Nunber (mg/kg)
000088-06-2
000609-19-8
000093-76-5 7.8E+02*
000096-18-4 4.7E+02*
000102-71-6
001582-09-8 5.9E+02*
.000099-35-4 3. 9E+OO*
000118-96-7 3.9E+01*
000126-72-7
007440-62-2 5.5E+02*
001314-62-1 7.0E+02*
000108-05-4 7.8E+04*
000075-01-4
000081-81-2 2.3E+01*
. 000108-38-3 1.6E+05*
000095-47-6 1.6E+05*
000106-42-3.
007440-66-6 2.3E+04*
SOIL PATll\.lAY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
5.8E+01*
8._3E+01*
2.1E+01*
3.4E-01*
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
-~rdi;;. ncdous.;tanc~curr~rsio~chem~data ~N96 >Jj -.. I. -
-r
Page B-84
SCOH Data Version: JUN96
19 AUG 96
Substance Name
Zinc cyanide
Zinc phosphide
Zinc sulfate
-----HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
Hazardous Substance Benchmarks
376 Substances
Reference Dose
Screen Cone
CAS Nullber (mg/kg)
000557-21-1 3.9E+03*
001314-84-7 2.3E+Ol*
007733-02-0
SOIL PATH~AY
Cancer Risk
Screen Cone
(mg/kg)
iiiil
* Indicates difference between previous version of chemical data ( JUN94 ) and current version of chemical data ( JUN96 ).
** Indicates ne~ ~azardous substance in current version of chemica~ data ( JUN96 ).
liiill -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
Inactive Hazardous Sites Program
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Superfund Section
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
401 Oberlin Road -Suite 150
Raieigh, North Carolina 27605
Telephone: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
Table 4-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)1
*Hazardous substances identified with an asterisk exhibit both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic
' effects. The carcinogenic remediation goal is1isted because it is more stringent at the l.OE-6 risk
concentration than the remedialion goal/or non-carcinogenic effects. Contact the Branch/or chemicals
naJ listed in this table. Cleanup below meihod detection limits, using analytical methods prescribed in .
the guidelines, is not required. ·
Chemicalc ,-'/ . · . ,. ': ·.\.':'; CASIUV ... -°R.a.rvo'/iii\:" .•·. · · .. ., -·: ,• .. , :;·
.
Acetone 67641 1560 N
Acetone cyanohydrin 75865 I 100 N
Acetonitrile 75078 94 N
Acetophenone 98862 1560 N
Acrolein 107028 320 N
Acrylamide * 79061 0.14 C
Acrylic acid 79107 7800 N
Acrylonitrile * 107131 .. 1.2 C
Aldicarb 116063 15.6 N
Aldrin* 309002 ' 0.038 C
Ally! alcohol 107186 78 N
Ally! chloride 107051 780 N
4-Aminopyridine 504245 0.32 N
Ammonium sulfamate 7773060 3200 N
Aniline 62533 110 C
Antimony and compounds (not listed below) 7440360 6.2 N
Antimony pentoxide 1314609 7.8 N
Antimo!l)' potassiuF.! tartrate 304610 14 N
Antimony tetroxide 1332316 6.2 N
Antimony trioxide 1309644 6.2 N
Arsenic 7440382 4.6 N
Benzene 71432 ,22 C
Benzenethiol 108985 0.156 N
. Benzidine * 92875 , 0.0028 C
Benzoic acid 65850 62000 N
Benzotrichloride 98077 0.049 ·C
. Benzvl chloride 100447 3.8 C
Adapted from USEPA Region III Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted, .
2
C
The RG is I ppm from 0-10 inches a~d IO ppm below, 10 inches. . .·, , . 1 The RG is based on the carcinogenice_ndpoint a~.d corresponds t~ an exce_ss lifetime c~cei;ri_s_k o_f-1 in . 1,000,000. · . .
L
N
NA-
p
The RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels.
The RG is based on the non-carcin~gen/c endpoint and,corresponds to a haza~d quotient of0_.2 .. ,,. ,. Not Available. · · · · · · ·•· · · · .
The RG is based on USEP A PCB spill policy.
4-5
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
Table 4-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG'si1~'\'B~nt:
... ~~ --~ ,J,-, ' '~:.··{· t:;;:.,~.
*Hazardous substances identified with an asterisk exhibit both carcinogen;/:J:fi;j,'---~-__ 'a; ,,.h . . d. . I . 1 · d b . . . -· . a-/?!!.. CCU:Cliio e11 ects. 1. e carcznogemc reme wtzon goa 1s 1ste ecause 11 1s more stringe'!I ai 1,;;t,'7~) ..
c;QJ1centration than the remediation goal for non-carcinogenic effects.-Contact the B;~;;;;--,!J!h..
I . t d . h. bl Cl b I th d d t · t · · · / · ..... !11.'i<; em not 1s e zn t 1s ta e. eanup e ow me o e ectzon 1m1ts, using ana ytical methods piesc'ti'iJ'}it the guidelines, is not required. ·r_-·';_1,.,: n
. '-'s';t•.,]'t;'~i,,~i;
----·--1 . ·~: ,.:,:,,~tt (. ,' Chemical ·-_..,',_'-: -,.--}' -:/:, CASRN •·}/' ,:.,': RG(ooi,i)·•·"·:• ·:·::} -·.-
Beryllium and compounds • 7440417 '32
alpha BHC 3 I 9846 0.1
beta BHC 319857 0'35 .
gamma BHC (Lindane)* 58899 0.49
technical BHC (hexachlorocyclohexane, all isomers) 608731 0.35
B is(2-chloroethy l)ether 111444 0:58
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)* . 1178 I 7 '46
Bis( chloromethy ])ether 542881 0.0029
Bromodichloromethane • 75274 IO
Bromoform (tribromomethane)* 75252 81
Bromomethane 74839 22
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 101553 900
1-Butanol 71363 1560
Butyl benzyl phthalate 85687 3200
Cacodylic acid 75605 46
Cadmium and compounds 7440439 7.8
Caplan* 133062 180
Carbary] 63252 1560
Carbon disulfide 75150 1560
Carbon tetrachloride • 56235 4.9
Chloral 75876 32
Chlordane• 57749 1.8
Chlorine 7782505 1560
2-Chloro-1,3-butadiene 126998 320
4-Chloro-2,2-methylaniline hydrochloride 3165933 1.4
4-Chloro-2-methylaniline 95692 I: I
Chloroacetaldehvde 107200 108
2
Adapted from USEPA Region Ill Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted.
The RG is I ppm from 0-IO inches and 1 O ppm below IO inches. · _ _
C
L
N
NA -
p
The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint arid corresponds io an excess lifetime cancer risk of 1 in
1,000,000.
The RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels.
The RG is based on the n6n-carcinogeni~ endpoint and corresponds to a hazard quotient of0.2.
Not Available.
The RG is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
4-6
N
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
N
N
N
N
N
N
C
N
N
C
N
C
N
N
C
C
N
· ·£:-rt
r
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I r
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
Table 4-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)1 -(Cont.)
*Hazardous substances identified with an asterisk exhibit both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects. The carcinogenic remediation goal is listed because it is more stringent at the 1. 0£"6 risk concentration than the remediation goal/or non-carcinogenic effects. Contact the Branch/or chemicals hot listed in this table. Cleanup below method detection limits, using analytical methods prescribed inf the guidelines, is not required.
~ Cheinical:i·:-,·· ~-. ' " ::;:: CASRN ')'\';•· Re 1,;;,111i ,,._:, .. · .. ,,;,,: ,:·-.. "·,.• .. · .'~
4-Chloroaniline 106478 62 N Chlorobenzene 108907 320 N ·-Chlorobenzilate • 510156 2.4 4-Chlorobenzotrifluoride 98566 320 1-Chlorobutane 109693 6200
Chlorodibromomethane • 124481 7.6
Chloroethane 75003 220
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 110758 400 Chloroform • '67663 JOO Chloromethane 74873 49 beta-Chloronaphthalene 91587 1260 o-Chloronitrobenzene 88733 26 p-Chloronitrobenzene 100005 35 2-Chlorophenol 95578 78 o-Chlorotoluene 95498 320
Chlorpyrifos 2Y21882 46 Chromium Ill and compounds. 16065831 15600 Chromium VI and compounds 18540299 78 Copper and compounds 7440508 620
Crotonaldehyde • 123739 0.34
Curnene 98828 1560
Cvanide 57125 320
Cyclohexanone 108941 78000 2-Cyclohexyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (4;6-Dinitro-o-cyclohexyl phenol) 131895 32
Dalapon 75990 460
ODD 72548 2.7 DOE 72559 1.9
2
Adapted from USEPA Region III Risk Based Concentration .Table, except as noted. The RG is I ppm from 0-10 inches and IO ppm below IO inches. . . C The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and correspo'~ds to an excess lifetime cancer risk of I in 1,000,000.
L
N
NA -
p
The RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels.
The RG is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and correspo.nds to a hazard quotient of0.2. . . . . ,,·, Not Available. · ·
The RG is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
4-7
C
N
N
C
C
N
C
C
N
C
C
N
N
N
N
N
N
C
N
N
N
N
N
C
C
'
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
It
I
I
Table 4-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)1 -(Cont.)
*Hazardous substances identified wilh an aslerisk exhibit bolh carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic
ejfecls. The carcinogenic remedialion goal is !isled because ii is more slringenl cil the J.OE-' risk
_concentralion lhan the remediation goal for non-carcinogenic ejfecls. Con/act /he Branchfor,chemicals
no/ /isled in !his /able. Cleanup below me/hod deleclion limils, using analylical me/hods prescribed in
the guidelines, is not required.
· ·chemtclil ·' .• .. '· ·.·.·;. C4.SRN • .· -.,., RGI,fo. i)"> .. i' ,. -. ·~·· . ',,. ,.nJ.:" m: , .
DDT* 50293 1.9
Diallale .
2303164 10
Diazinon 333415 14
Dibenzofuran 132649 62
1,2-Dibromo-3-ch!oropropane 96128 0.46
1,2-Dibromoethane 106934 0.0075
I
2
Di-n-butyl ,ihthalate 84742
Dicamba 1918009
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95501
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541731
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106467
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 91941
Dichlorodifluoromethane 75718
I, 1-Dichloroethane 75343
1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) 107062
I, 1-Dichloroethylene* 75354
1,2-Dichloroethylene (cis) . 156592
1,2-Dichloroethylene (mixture) 540590
1,2-Dichloroethylene (trans) 156605
2,4'Dichlorophenol 120832
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) 94757
1,2-Dichloropropane 78875
2;3-Dichloropropanol 616239
1,3-Dichloropropene * 542756
Dichlorvos * 62737
Dicofol 115322
Dieldrin * 60571
Adapted from USEPA Region llI Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted.
The RG is I ppm from 0-10 inches and IO ppm below IO inches.
1560
460
1400
460
27
1.4
3200
1560
,7
I.I
156
140
320
46
156
9.4
46
3.5
2,2
1.5
0.04
C The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to an excess lifetime cancer risk of I in
L
N
NA -
p
1,000,000.
The RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead clea~up levels.
The RG is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to a hazard quotient of0.2,
Not Available.
The RG is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
4-8
C
C
N
N
C
C
N
N
N
N
C
C
N
N
C
C
N
N
N
N
N
C
N
C
C
C
C
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
It
I
I
Table 4-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)1 -(Cont.)
*Hazardous substances identified with an asterisk exhibit both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic
effects. The carcinogenic remediation goal is iisted because it is more stringent at the 1. 0£;6 risk
concentration than the remediation goal for non-carcinogenic effects. Contact the Branch for chemicals
not listed in this table. Cleanup below method detection limits, using analytical methods prescribed in
the guidelines, is not required.
. Chemical'/ . _-._. ,,:.· i".·· c::./ /,ASRN .,·.<. RG(oom),.'.' . . . ..
Diethyl phthalate 84662 12600 N
Diethy lstilbestro 1 56531 0.00014 C
Dimethoate 60515 3.2 N
3,3'-Dimethoxybenzidine 119904 46 C
3 ,3'-Dimethylbenzidine I I 9937 0.069 C
I, 1-Dimethylhydrazine 57147 0.25 C
1,2-Dimethylhydrazine 540738 0.017 C
2,4-Dimethylphenol 105679 320 N
Dimethyl phthalate 131113 156000 N
1,2-Dinitrobenzene (o-Dinitrobenzene) · 528290 6.2 N
1,3-Dinitrobenzene (m-Dinitrobenzene) 99650 1.56 N
1,4-Dinitrobenzene (p-Dinitrobenzene) 100254 6.2 N
2,4-Dinitrophenol 51285 32 N
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 12 I 142 32 N
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 606202 15:6 N
Dinitrotoluene mixture NA 0.94 C
Dinoseb 88857 15.6 N
1,4-Dioxane (p-Dioxane) 123911 58 C
Dioxins and Fu rans
2,3, 7, 8-Heptach lorodibeuzo-p-dioxin (2,3, 7 ,8-HPeCD D) NA 0.0004 C
2,3, 7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3, 7,8-HxCDD) NA 0.00004 C
Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (OCDD) NA 0.004 C
2,3, 7,8~Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3, 7,8-PeCDD) NA 0.000008 C
2,3, 7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3, 7 ,8-TCDD) 1746016 0.000004 C
2,3,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran (2,3, 7,8-HPCDF) NA 0.0004 C
2,3, 7,8-H exachlorod ibenzofuran (2,3, 7,8-HxCD F) NA 0.00004 · C
Octochlorodibenzofuran (OCDF) · NA 0.004 C
I Adapted from USEPA Region Ill Risk Based.Concentration Table, except as noted.
2 The RG is I ppm from 0-IO inches and IO ppm below IO inches.
C The RG is based on the carcinogenic eudpoint and corresponds to an excess lifetime cancer risk of I in
1,000,000. . ,.
L The RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels.
N The RG is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to a hazard quotient of0.2.
NA -Not Available. ., . . .
p The RG is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
4-9
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
. -·. "':"~,;:i;h~l!l'& ... .. -· · -.~--:.}~Pt-r~ .. . -,~ ~4;'.:t,~J~,.
Table 4-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)1 -(Co~t.) ·':~·, 'f,s:·
i ~
*Hazardous substances identified with an asterisk exhibit both carcinogenic and non-ca/2inV;i~~,c ..•
effects. The carcinogenic remediation goal is listed because it is more stringent at the J. 0£-6 r';;ic'-"'Y'E;:..:§!!,,.. .
co,ncentration than the remediation goal/or non-carcinogenic effects. Contact the Branch for ·che'n,'1~:Jis• ·· _, °':''
not listed in this table. Cleanup below method detection limits, using analytical methods prescribeiin · ,;:.
the guidelines, is not required.
.
Clzemical .. ,.: ' ••· CASRN .··,··:> . <RG (ppni).:c• : .... ., ... . ,;, . ·--.. ·-.-.-.•· .,
1,2,3,7 ,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran (1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF) NA 0.00008 C
2,3, 7 ,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran (2,3,7 ,8-PeCDF) NA 0.000008 C
2.3. 7 ,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran (2.3, 7 ,8-TCDF) NA 0.00004 C
Diphenylamine 122394 400 N
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 122667 0.8 C
Diquat 85007 34 N
Disulfoton 298044 0.62 N
Diuron 330541 32 N
Endosulfan I 15297 ,94 N
Endothall 145733 320 N
Endrin 72208 4.6 N
Epichlorohydrin * 106898 65 C
Ethion 563122 7.8 N
2-Ethoxyethanol I I 0805 6200 N
Ethyl acetate 141786 14000 N
Ethyl acrylate 140885 13 C
Ethyl benzene 100414 1560 N
Ethylene diamine 107153 320 N
Ethylene oxide 75218 0.64 C
Ethylenethiourea (ETU)* 96457 5.8 C
Ethyl ether 60297 3200 N
Ethyl methacrylate 97632 1400 N
Formaldehyde 50000 3200 N
Formic acid 64186 32000 N
Furfural 9801 I 46 N
Glycidaldehyde 765344 6.2 N
Heptachlor * 76448 0.14 C
2
C
Adapted from USEPA Region III Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted.
The RG is 1 ppm from 0-10 inches and 10 ppm below 10 inches.
The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to an excess lifetime cancer risk of 1 in
L
N
NA -
p
1,000,000.
The RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels.
The RG is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to ·a hazard quotient of 0.2.
Not Available.
The RG is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
4 -JO
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I I
I
Table 4-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)1 -(Cont.)
*Hazardous substances identified with an asterisk exhibit both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic
effects. The carcinogenic remediation goal is listed because ii is more slringenl al the I. 0£-6 risk concen/ralion than the remediation goal for non-carcinogenic effects. Con/act the Branch for chemicals noi /isled in this fable. Cleanup below method detection limits, using analylical methods prescribed in the guidelines, is no/ required.
' Chemical> ...... ,·_.,(',;, CASRN ,,. : :: RO (voO,)'.·. '_· ... ''· ,•,'-, .. ; ... ' . m:.-:.,·.-.·
Heptachlor epoxide • 1024573 0.07 C
Hexachlorobenzene* I 18741 0.4 C
Hexachlorobutadiene • 87683 f2 C
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77474 110 N
Hexachloroethane • 67721 46 C
Hexachlorophene 70304 4.6 N
Hydrazine 302012 0.21 C
Hydrogen sulfide 7783064 46 N
lsophorone • · 78591 670 C
Kepone 143500 0.035 C
Lead 7439921 400 L
Malathion 121755 320 N
Maleic anhydride I 083 I 6 1560 N
Maleic hydrazide 123331 7800 N
Malononitrile I 09773 0.32 N
Mercury (inorganic) 7439976 4,6 N
Methacrylonitrile 126987 1.56 N
Methanol 67561 7800 N
Methomyl 16752775 400 N
Methoxychlor 72435 78 N
2-Methyl benzenamine (2-methylaniline) 95534 2.7 C
2-Methyl benzenamine hydrochloride (2-methylaniline hydrochloride) 636215 3.5 C
Methyl chlorocarbonate 79221 15600 N
4,4'-Methylene bis(2 chloroaniline)* IOI 144 ' 4.9 C
Methylene bromide 74953 156 N
Methylene chloride • 75092 85 C
Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) 78933 9400 N
I Adapted from USEPA Region Ill Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted.
2 The RG is I ppm from 0-IO inches and IO ppm below IO inches.
C The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to an excess lifetime cancer risk of I in 1,000,000. . . .
L The RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels.
N The RG is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to a hazard quotient'of 0.2.
NA -Not Available.
p The RG is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
4 -11
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
Table 4-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)1 -(Cont.)
*Hazardous substances identified with an asterisk exhibit both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects. The carcinogenic remediation goal is listed because it is more stringent at the I. 0£6 risk concentration than the remediation goal for non-carcinogenic effects. Contact the Branch for chemicals n0t listed in this table. Cleanup below method detection limits. using analytical methods prescribed in the guidelines, is not required.
2
. ' . ':: . ' Chemical· ·-:·,-, •.' . . ,,· , ... , . 'd :······ cAsRN _J; . ,, RG (rin'm) ·: .·.· . ';. :;":,,,; :·•:: ,:,,,., .
Methyl hydrazine 60344
Methyl isobutyl ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone) 108101
Methyl methacrylate 80626
Methyl parathion 298000
3-Methylphenol (m-cresol) 108394
2-Methylphenol (o-creso!) 95487
4-Methylphenol (p-cresol) 106445
2-Methly -1-propanol (isobutanol, isobutyl alcohol) 78831
Naled 300765
2-Naphthylamine 91598
Nickel and compounds 7440020
Nitric oxide !0102439
4-Nitroaniline 100016
Nitrobenzene 98953
Nitrogen dioxide 10102440
4-Nitrophenol 100027
N-Nitrosodiethanolamine 1116547
N-Nitrosodiethylamine 55185
N-Nitrosodimethylamine 62759
N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine 924163
N-Nitroso di-n-propylamine 621647
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 86306
N-Nitroso-N-ethylurea ( ethylnitrosourea) 759739
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine 930552
Nitrotoluene (mixed)
Octamethylpyrophosphoramide 152169
di-n-Octvl ohthalate 117840
Adapted from USEPA Region lII Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted. The RG is I ppm from 0-10 inches and l O ppm below IO inches.
0.58
1260
22000
4
780
780
78
. 4600
32
0.0049
320
1560
46
7.8
15600
126
0.23
0.0043
0.013
0. 12
0.091
130
0.0046
0.3
156
32
320
: ,· ...
C
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
C
N
N
N
N
N
N
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
N
N
N
C The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to an excess lifetime cancer risk of 1 in
L
N
NA -
p
1,000,000.
The RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels. The RG. is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to a hazard quotient of0.2. Not Available.
The RG is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
4 -12
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
It
I
I
Table 4-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)1 -(Cont.)
*Hazardous substances identified with an asterisk exhibit both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic
effects. The carcinogenic remediation goal is listed because it is more stringent at the 1. 0£"61risk
concentration than the remediation goal for non-carcinogenic effects. Contact the Branch for chemicals
not listed in ihis table. Cleanup below method detection limits, using analytical methods prescribed in
the guidelines, is not required.
Cl ... . .., ... , ·, t'"emicah, .. ·'...·. . CASRN · ,r· ,.:,. RG (ppti1)
Paraquat 1910425 70 N
Parathion 56382 94 N
Pentachlorobenzene 608935 12.6 N
Pentachloronitrobenzenc * 82688 2.5 C
Penlachlorophenol * 87865 5.3 C
Phenol 108952 9400 N
p-Phenylenediamine 106503 3000 N
Phenylmercuric acetate 62384 1.26 N
Phorate 298022 3.2 N
Phosphine 7803512 4'.6 N
Phosphorus (white) 7723140 0.32 N
Phlhalic anhydride 85449 32000 N
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)2 1336363 1/10 p
Polvnuc/ear aromatic /rvdrocarhons
Acenaphthene 83329 940 N
Anthracene 120127 4600 N
Benzo[a]pyrene 50328 0.088 C
Benzo[b ]fluoranthenc 205992 0.88 C
Benzo[k ]fluoranthene 207089 8.8 C
Benz[ a Janthracene 56553 0.88 C
Carbofuran 1563662 78 N
Chrysene 218019 88 C
Dibenz[ a,h Janthracene 53703 0.088 C
Fluoranthene 206440 620 N
Fluorene 86737 620 N
lndeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene 193395 0.88 C
Naohthalene 91203 620 N
I Adapted from USEP A Region Ill Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted.
2 The RG is 1 ppm from 0-10 inches and IO ppm below IO inches.
C The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to an excess lifetime cancer risk.of I in
1,000,000.
L The RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels ..
N The RG is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to a hazard quotient of 0.2.
NA -Not Available.
P The RG is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
4 -13
I
It
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
Table 4-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)1 -(Cont.)
*Hazardous substances identified with an asterisk exhibit both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic
effects. The carcinogenic remediation goal is listed because ii is more stringent al the 1. 0£"6 risk
concentration than the remediation goal for non-carcinogenic effects. Con/act the Branch for chemicals.
no/ listed in this table. Cleanup below method detection limits, using analytical methods prescribed in .,
the guidelines, is no/ required.
I
2
. Clieinical '/ ••. .? :_ :Ii:·;: c:A.silN. .. . ':._:._ .. :; .. ·· .. ·:·:'.•-''
2-methyl Naphthalene 91576
Pvrene 129000
Pronamide 23950585
Propargite 2312358
Propargyl alcohol 107197
Propazine 139402
Propylene oxide 75569
Pyridine I I 086 I
.Quinoline 91225
Selenious acid 7783008
Selenium 7782492
Selenourea 630104
Silver and compounds 7440224
Sodium azide 26628228
Sodium fluoroacetate 62748
Strychnine 57249
Styrene 100425
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 95943
I, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79345
I, I, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane * 630206
Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)* 127184
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 58902
p,a,a,a-Tetrachlorotoluene 5216251
Tetraethyldithiopyrophosphate 3689245
Tetraethyl lead 78002
Thallic oxide 1314325
Thallium NA
Adapted from USEPA Region III Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted.
The RG is I ppm from 0-10 inches and IO ppm below fo inches.
· RG (oom)-'.· ,
460
460
I 180
320
32
320
2.7
15.6
0.053
78
78
78
78
62
0.32
4.6
3200
4.6
3.2
25
12
460
0.032
7.8
0.00156
. I.I
I.I
C The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and cmTesponds· to an excess lifetime cancer risk of I in
L
N
NA-
P
1,000,000.
The RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup leveis.
The RG is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds.to a hazard quotient of0.2.
Not Available.
The RG is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
4 -14
N
N
N
N
N
N
C
N
C
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
C
C
C
N
C
N
N
N
N
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
Table 4-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)1 -(Cont.)
*Hazardous substances identified with an asterisk exhibit both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic
effects. The carcinogenic remediation goal is listed because it is more stringent at the I. 0£"6 risk
concentration than the remediation goal/or non-carcinogenic effects. Contact the Branch/or chemicals
naJ listed in this table. Cleanup below method detection limits, using analytical methods prescribed in
the guidelines, is not required.
.,.: . •c;,•:i: Chemical ·. -, . cAsRN "'· •· RG (nnm) ... . ,·., --
Thallium acetate 563688 IA N
Thallium carbonate 6533739 1.26 N
Thallium chloride 7791120 1.26 N
Thallium nitrate 10102451 1.4 N
Thallium selenite 12039520 IA N
Thallium sulfate 7446186 1.26 N
Thiofanox 39196184 4.6 N
Thiram 137268 78 N
Toluene 108883 3200 N
Toluene-2,4-diamine 95807 0.2 C
Toluene-2,6-diamine 823405 3200 N
p-Toluidine 106490 3.4 C
Toxaphene 8001352 0.58 C
1, l ,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 76131 460000 N
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 156 N
1, 1, I -Trichloroethane 71556 320 N
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane * 79005 11 C
Trichlorciethylene (TCE)* 79016 58 C
Tri ch I orofl uorom ethane 75694 4600 N
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88062 58 C
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 95954 1560 N
2-(2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy)propionic acid 93721 126 N
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid 93765 156 N
1, 1,2-Trichloropropane 598776 78 N
1,2,3-Trichloropropane * 96184 0.091 C
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 99354 460 N
Vanadium pentoxide 1314621 140 N
1 Adapted from USEPA Region Ill Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted.
2 The RG is I ppm from 0-1 0 inches and 10 ppm below 10 inches.
C The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to an excess lifetime cancer risk of 1 in
1,000,000.
L The RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels.
N The RG is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to a hazard quotient of 0.2.
NA -Not Available.
P The RG is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
4 -15
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
It
I
I
w-~4,:~~1;'
. "'.;<".,,.,.;,;,·: •.
Table 4-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)1 -(Cont.) ...
*Hazardous substances identified with an asterisk exhibit both ·carcinogenic and non-carciYfogenic effects. The carcinogenic remediation goal is listed because it is more stringent at the I. OE-6 risk concentration than the remediation goal for non-carcinogenic effects. Contact the Branch/or chemicals· not listed in this table. Cleanup below method detection limits, using analytical methods prescribed in the guidelines, is not required
I
2
C
L
N
NA-
p
C!,emical, ;-··
'' CASRN •·· · ·· RG fnnm)· , , •. ,:· ,·-1'
Vinyl acetate 108054
Vinyl chloride 75014
Xylene (mixed) 1330207
Zinc 7440666
Zinc phosphide
. 1314847
Adapted from USEPA Region III Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted. The RG is I ppm from 0-10 inches and IO ppm below IO inches.
15600 N
0.34 C
32000 N
4600 N
4.6 N
The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to an excess lifetime cancer risk of I in 1,000,000. The RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels. The RG is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to a hazard quotient of0.2. Not Available.
The RG is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
4 -16
..,.:¼~~
--.------.--.-----iiiill r ..
.ar
8A TTERIES, SECONDARY (LEAD-ACID) 653
t
i..·~ .Vol. 3
trends of use of lead alloys for the manufacture of battery grids are discussed in a review
(82).
!.liJ,_•• Casting (83). The grid-casting machine consists of a center-parting grid mold,
~-trimming mechanism, and melting pots. The grid mold consists of two cast iron parts,
! ' 'f:' each with a grid design for a face. The mold design also can be a single grid or multi1,le
1
11· f grid configuration. The grid mold is heated to 185-180°C to prevent premature so-
~ lidification of the lead alloy; holes in the mold release trapped air while the mold is
~; being filled with the molten metal.
1
·1m_::,: The melting pot is heated either electrically or by gas to 427-524 °C. The pot ca-
~ pacity is over 100 kg oflead alloys, and periodically the top of the molten metal must !~· be skimmed to remove the dross. The harmful pot fumes must be removed by adequate
,~, ventilation (forced suction). When the molten metal has reached the proper temper-il&J' ature and flow characteristics, it is tran_sported by pump to the grid mold.
•,• ~ Prior to casting, the grid mold halves are sprayed with a mold release agent (see
i-i!J{ Abherents). After filling with a slight excess of molten lead alloy, the mold is cooled
,,· ~ for several seconds before opening.
i _1:; The cast grid is trimmed to remove rough edges and minor imperfections before l _;;,:_ stacking for use in the plate processing operation. •1•1: The mold temperature has more influence on castability than the casting metal
'il temperature (84). However, the in.creased benefits from improving castability by l utilizing hotter molds are limited by the required production rate. Also discussed in
I ref. 84 are the effects of antimony, tin, arsenic, copper, and bismuth on the castability
of lead battery alloys. Several articles delineate the casting of lead-calcium alloys into j.. grids (85), and the casting of the lead-antimony alloys into tubular spines (86-87).
CuMent Trends. Although a majority oft he grids today are cast, grids are also being
manufactured by punching or perforating sheet metal, by the expanded metal process,
I and by wire-forming techniques. Most of these new grid making techniques are being
used with lead-calcium alloys (for maintenance-free batteries), and if they gain wide
I acceptance there will be a possibility of revolutionary high-speed manufacturing
processes with lead-acid battery designs, and battery performance characteristics I ·. (62).
I'.,•· In scenarios of the maintenance-free battery, the topics described are alloys, grid
fabrication, battery fabrication, battery performance, and applications (88-90), Before j .. lead-calcium batteries come into wide use the problem of what to do with the lead-
1::,_' calcium scrap from spent batteries must be resolved (90), Since half of the lead used
· in the United States comes from scrap (usually lead-antimony alloys), this is an im-
1•. }i, portant aspect of the lead supply for batteri~s and should not be ignored. Recyclers t, of lead scrap say the shift to lead-calcium alloys could drastically disrupt the lead scrap •,~x business. There is profit from the value of the antimony content. Although calcium
~ · can be oxidized from the lead scrap, some of it will form a very stable compound ·. iii,~. (Ca3Sb2) from which it is very difficult to recover antimony. The calcium and antimony
. ·~ lead alloys cannot be mixed because antimony poisons calcium by lowering the hy-
drogen overpotential_ on the negative plate using a lead-calcium grid. Segregating the
two types of alloys would be costly and the reclaimed lead could not be used in lead-
calcium batteries because of stringent purity requirements (91). Thus improved or
,. new techniques must be developed to reprocess the lead alloy scrap so it will be readily
;' accepted for use by the battery industry (see Recycling).
ffJWlktl1f •
"' "' f' ~ t-
.1 ~ ~
--c. ~ "\\' ij ~ ~ ~" I \
~
-~ J ~
4 J u ---...
,/ .,., lo "'
I '\i--~ ~--• ~
• "-. "' [ ,. l IS',
. t ~ ~,.
J~~ ''\-_
✓ --1: ~ ~ ~ :--" ~ 1 ';; ~ '-= ~~ ~ i111 ~ tt ~ i
.\l
J.
~
654 BATTERIES, SECONDARY (LEAD-ACID)
Active Material. Oxide Manufacture (92). The active materials for the positive
(Pb02) and negative plates (Pb) are prepared from lead oxides in combination with
finely divided metallic lead, The·lead·oxide·(PoO) usecf in b-aitery plates exists in two
1crystalline.f.9_iins, the yellow .~Jthor_h9mbic form and the red tetragonal.fonri, The red
oxide~Pb;b,, is sometimes used in making battery plates but its use is declining, The
ultimate positive plate active material, lead dioxide (Pb02), is never pasted directly
onto the plate.grid because plates made in this manner shed their active material after
the plate has been dried or after a few battery cycles.
The lead oxide (PbO) is formed by tumbling high purity lead pigs or balls in a
water-cooled ball mill. The heat generated by friction and oxidation during this process
causes an oxidation of the lead surface, This surface is gradually eroded during the
tumbling operation, and the final product consists of almost 100% tetragonal crystalline
lead oxide and finely divided metallic lead, This product is transferred from the ball
mill either by overflowing at the outlet or by being carried away in the air stream,·
The lead oxide to metallic ratio can be controlled by the amount of air being forced
into the ball mill, the mill charge temperature, and the amount of the mill charge, The
amount of impurities in the lead pigs or balls affects the hardness and', therefore, affects
the particle-size distribution, apparent density, and reactivity of the lead oxide,
The PbO formed by this milling process contains 15-30 wt% metallic lead, The
type of milling process described above is referred to as an attrition mill operation
(74 ),
Lead oxides can also be made by the Barton pot method (93), In this operation,
molten lead is fed into a pot and vigorously agitated by a stirrer, This stirring action
breaks the lead into fine droplets by forcing the molten lead against a fixed baffle ar-
rangement inside the pot These fine droplets are then oxidized by a stream of air
passing through the pot, and the resulting material is carried off to a settling chamber_
The lead oxide (PbO) formed by this process contains hoth orthorhombic and te-
tragonal crystalline varieties as well as 15-30 wt% finely divided metallic lead parti-
cles.
Through careful adjustment of the following factors in the Barton process, it is
possible to produce a virtually lead-free product that is relatively high in orthorhombic
lead oxide, These factors are pot temperature (high temperatures of> 327°C favor
the formation of orthorhombic lead oxide) and the air 11ow through the pot. These ¼$
factors also control the lead oxide reactivity, particle-size distribution and apparent
density. · :t
The lead oxides prepared by the above procedures must have the desirable ,j
physical characteristics that enhance battery capacity and life_ Fine lead oxides provide ,,.c ~,n,
short-life, high-efficiency batteries whereas coarse oxides produce long-life, low-ef-,'1'.
ficiency batteries, The lead oxides made by the ball mill or the Barton process have l~
an apparent density of L22-L53 g/cm", If necessary, the lead oxides can be ground ir
to finer particle sizes in ball or impact mills, Even though the lead oxides made by the :\.~
attrition mill produce batteries of long life and good capacity, they are gradually being I
replaced by the Barton lead oxide, . :;-m
The lead oxides are stored in air-tight containers to prevent further oxidation. ;~ •:
It is mandatory that high purity be maintained at all phases of the lead oxide!'
manufacturing process. 'T'ellurium, nickel, antimony) and copper reduce negative plaU:
end-of-charge voltage; but small amounts ( ,;;0,02 wt%) of iron impurities can be tol,'
,rated in lead-antimony batteries, However, these impurities are detrimental to th
. '• I
I
I
·.vol. 3 BATTERIES, SECONDARY (LEAD-ACID) 655 ~ if lead-calcium battery because they increase gassing, stand loss, and charging voltage
½c'\!-requirements. Some manufacturers take advantage of the effects of impurities and
,·; add nickel or cobalt as charge voltage depressants for certain types of automotive
,· · hatteries.
A detailed discussion of lead oxide manufacturing procedures, purity specifica-
tions, physical and chemical analysis is in ref. 94.
Paste Mixing. Tlie positive plate)(PbO2) isfofinecl from.leacfoxide (PbO)·wnich I,..------" ---; .-. -: -

-
:: -i ·--is-mixed in-some·cases·with _<;20 wt% Pb.3O4, red lcad-(to aid.i_n_the formation step),
sulfurJC acid'(40'-'42wt %), fibers (to facilitate handling of the plate afte; pasting),fand
'water until tl\epaste has the proper con-sistency.for application.to the grids' (Fig . . 7).----. -
The negative plate·(-Pb) utilises the same ingregigi!1_s ?ligve, except the red lead'
ifomittea;'and expanders such as !~mp black (ca 0.2 wt%); certain organic com1iound§
1(~g;lighinsul~onic acid), and haritcm sulfate ( <;3 wt%) are addeq! The function ·of these
·expanders is to prevent contraction and solidification of the spongy lead and the
consequent loss of capacity and life of the finished battery. Low temperature plate
operation and high rate plate discharge are also aided by these expanders. Organic
expanders have been studied by several investigators (95-97); it is suspected these
compounds change the manner in which lead sulfate is formed on the surface of the
finely divided sponge lead and thus permit greater access and longer reaction time
between the sponge lead and the sulfuric acid electrolyte.
Mineral oil (98) is also another additive to the negative paste to protect a dry-
charged negative plate from oxidation and sulfa ti on (formation of lead sulfate on the
plate surface and in the pores of the active material (Pb) of the plate) and to reduce
hydrogen evolution.
The oil additive forms a monomolecular film over the oxide particles, thereby
minimizing the tendency for antimony to attach itself to the negative plate. It reduces
sulfation and gassing in lead-acid batteries made with lead-antimony positive grids .
For lead-calcium batteries, the oil additive's only function is protection of a dry-
charged negative plate from oxidation.
During the paste mixing process the lead oxides are partially converted to basic
lead sulfates (99). Some of these compounds are monobasic sulfate (PbO.PbSO4),
dibasic sulfate (2PbO.PbSO4), predominantly tribasic lead sulfate (3PbO.PbSOJ,
and, if high temperatures are encountered during the mixing step, tetrabasic sulfate
(4PbO.PbSO4). These compounds, because of their crystal morphology, bind tightly
together on the grid, and facilitate plate processing and battery cycling operations.
It is the degradation of this binding property (due to increased crystal growth (100))
that causes failure of the positive plate by shedding the active material. This active
material drops through the separator grooves, and collects in the sediment space (see
Fig. 1). This material is lost during electrochemical conversion and, subsequently, the
positive plate deteriorates over repeated cycling. The use of antimony in the positive
grid increases the paste adhesion. In addition, the tubular positive plate retards shedding as does the flat plate battery with its separator-glass mat combinations.
,~ .. ,._
·!.
The water added during the mixing operation functions as a lubricant to produce
a paste of the proper consistency and thickness. During the plate drying operation,
the evaporation of water gives the desired plate porosity. In addition to forming the
binding material, the sulfuric acid expands the paste and thus gives it greater poros-
{ ity.
.,, .,,
t' ~ t-
.l ~ ~
-i:. 'Ir '\-( ~ ' ~ ~"-
I I i ·? J ":)
~ 1 " " " "' '-' "'
• \)
. \)
J.
<:c.
656 BATTERIES, SECONDARY (LEAD-ACID)
During the acid addition step, considerable heat is evolved (due to the exothermic
reaction of lead oxide and sulfuric acid); and care must be taken to prevent loss of water
before the paste can be applied to the grids. The mixer is usually cooled by water or
air. After the paste has reached the desired uniformity and consistency for applying
to the grid, the mixing is stopped. Typical paste density is 3.7-4.6 g/cm". The paste
density range is generally 3.7-4.0 g/cm' for high initial capacity use and for long life
it may be as high as 4.3-4.6 g/cm3.
The three types of mixers used to make battery pastes are the n'iuller, the dough,
and the day. The most commonly used mixer is the muller type with a capacity of
545-1100 kg. All mixers can be water-or air-cooled.
Bode (101) has an excellent discussion of paste preparation and curing processes.
A comprehensive review (102) describes the morphological features o_fthe compounds
used or evolved in the initial paste material.
Pasting. The paste in a hopper of a pasting machine is apportioned to the grids
passing under the hopper. As the grid moves along, the paste is pressed into the grid's
interstices and the excess is removed. This process is highly automated, and it is
possible to process several hundred plates per minute. Not all grid sises can be ac-
commodated by automation, and very large grids must be pasted by hand. If the pasted
plates are to be stored, they must be dried by passing through a tunnel drier. After
drying, the plates are cured.
The tubular positive plate uses rigid, porous fiberglass tubes covered with a
perforated plastic foil as the active material retainer (see Fig. 2). The dry lead oxide
(PbO) is shaken into the tubes which are threaded over the grid spines. The open end
is then sealed by a polyethylene bar. Patents describe a procedure for making a type
of tube for the tubular positive plate (103) and a method for filling tubular plates of
lead acid batteries (104).
Tubular positive plates proceed directly to formation and do not require the curing
procedure.
Plate Curing. To initiate the curing process, the pasted grids are placed in
80-100% humidity at 41-52°C for several days. This step converts the free lead par-
ticles in the plates to lead oxide. By controlling humidity, time, and temperature, the
free lead content can be reduced to the desired level ( < 5 wt%). These factors must
be carefully controlled so the small crystals of tribasic lead sulfate are obtained because
these crystals are easily converted to very active lead dioxide (positive plate) during
the formation process. If too high a temperature(> 57°C) is encountered during the
curing process, coarse crystals of tetra basic lead are formed that are difficult to convert
to lead dioxide and may cause shedding of the active material during formation.
Finally, the cured plates are dried 111 an oven or in the air for stacking prior to
formation or transferred to the forming tanks while still in the moist condition.
Formation. After the plates have been cured, formation (or charging) converts
the inert lead oxide sulfate paste into active plates (105). For this conversion process,
the cured plates are electrically oxidized or reduced in a forming tank c~11taining dilute
sulfuric acid solution ( < 20 wt%). Those plates which will become the positive plates
(PbO2) are the anode and the negative plates (Pb) are the cathode. After an initial soak
period, the electrical conversion ranges from a few hours to several days depending
on the formation rate used. The final plate composition for the positive plate-is a
mixture of 85-95 wt% <Y-and /J-lead dio~ide and the negative plate is> 90 wt% lead
(74).
I
-, Vol. 3 BATTERIES, SECONDARY (LEAD-ACID) 657
After tank formation, the positive plate is washed with water to remove excess
. sulfuric acid, and air-dried at moderately elevated temperatures. Because the charged
negative plate would oxidize rapidly if exposed to air in the moist condition, it must
be dried in a vacuum chamber or inert atmosphere of CO and CO2 at moderately ele-
vated temperatures. Once the positive and negative plates are properly dried they can
be stored indefinitely.
Another type of formation used is accomplished in the battery container. The
cured plates are assembled into cells before they are placed into the finished battery
container. Dilute sulfuric acid is added, and the plates and separators are allowed to
absorb electrolyte before electrical conversion begins. After these plates have been
converted (within a few days), the sulfuric acid is dumped and the container refilled
with fresh sulfuric acid to achieve the proper concentration for the intended battery
service. In some instances, the specific gravity of the initial filling acid is adjusted so
that upon completion of formation the specific gravity is at the desired value, and the
dump and refill step is omitted. For automotive service, the specific gravity of the
sulfuric acid is 1.260 or 34 wt% of sulfuric acid; for electrical industrial trucks the
specific gravity is 1.27.5 or 37 wt% of sulfuric acid; and for standby applications the
specific gravity is 1.210 or 29 wt% of sulfuric acid. This finished battery is shipped
in the wet state whereas the battery with the tank-formed plates may be shipped in
the wet or dry-charged state.
The tubular positive plates are soaked in 40 wt% sulfuric acid solution for at least
6 h for conversion to lead oxide sulfate, electrically converted in a tank or container
to PbO2 in dilute sulfuric acid ( < 20 wt%), washed with water to remove excess sulfuric
acid, and air-dried at moderately elevated temperatures. After the tubular plates have
been properly dried, they can be stored indefinitely.
An excellent discussion of the lead-acid battery formation process and the initial
charge-discharge battery cycle is found in ref. 106.
Separators. To prevent contact of the positive and negative plate, a separator
is placed between them. These separators are usually in sheet form and are commonly
made of paper, rubber, glass, or plastic. Since sulfuric acid must permeate the sepa-
rator, it must be microporous. The separators are generally ribbed on the side placed
toward the positive plate. This procedure prevents excessive separator contact with
the oxidizing positive plate material, and it allows a greater volume of sulfuric acid
to be used by the positive plate during discharge (107).
A comprehensive paper discusses a waffle-shaped separator for use in lead-acid
batteries. The materials used for this separator are poly(vinyl chloride) and polyester
or polypropylene. The separator manufacturing processes are explained in great detail,
and battery performance data is correlated with type of separator (108).
An excellent review article (109) evaluates the whole spectrum of materials used
for lead-acid battery separators. In order to achieve long battery life, higher power,
and freedom from maintenance, the separator materials will have to be polymeric,
have a pore size of> 1-10 /Lill, be very pure and have an electrical resistance of< 3.1
X 104 k11/m 2• Another paper (110) describes the use of separators and methods for
measuring relevant separator characteristics.
Sulfuric Acid. The dilution of sulfuric acid must be done with adequate cooling
because the dilution process is highly exothermic. Each manufacturer selects a par-
ticular sulfuric acid concentration which is a compromise between lead grid corrosion
and battery performance.
658 BATTERIES; SECONDARY (LEAD-ACID)
The gelled suifuric acid electrolyte can be made by several procedures (111-113).
One procedure is that described by Bastacky (4). The thixotropic gelled electrolyte
is made by mixing sodium silicate, demineralized water, and dilute sulfuric acid to
obtain a thixotropic gel. The gel is immediately poured into the finished battery, and
it begins to set in ca 20 min at normal temperatures. A space is built into the battery
cover above the top of the gel to accommodate a liquid phase which forms from the
gel during charging. The liquid is reabsorbed by the gel during discharge, and the
gel-liquid electrolyte minimizes the escape of gases from the battery.
Extensive data on purity requirements and physical and chemical properties of
sulfuric acid are described in ref. 114.
Lead-Acid Battery Assembly ( 115)
After formation, the dry plates are assembled into cells. The individual cell
consists of several positive pl;ites and several negative plates with separators sand-
wiched between the plates (see Fig. 1). The more plates connected in parallel, the larger
the cell capacity; and each cell (usually consisting of several plates) is mosl commonly
connected in series to another to increase the total battery voltage. The positive and
negative groups are assembled by burning the individual grid lugs lo their respective
lead alloy strap and terminal post via a jig fixture. The negative group always has one
more plate than its positive counterpart group, so that when the two groups are meshed
each positive plate is located between two negative plates. This configuration prevents
distortion or buckling of the positive plates. After assembly of the cell elements, the
container is sealed.
The terminal posts are burned to the appropriate design and the_positive terminal
stamped with the positive polarity symbol. To determine the possibility of a short,
a resistance check is made between the terminals.
If the plates ha,·e been stabilized by the techniques previously described, the
battery can be stored in the dry condition until activated.
The final step for a dry-charge battery is lo fill it with the desired sulfuric acid
solution.
The above assembly procedure adequately describes the lead-acid batteries il-
lustrated in Figures 1-3. The sealed lead-acid cell in Figure 4 utilizes the spirally wound
plate concept, in which the positive and negative plates are sandwiched by alternate
separator layers (116). The current tabs are on opposite ends of their respective plat.es,
so that when the plates are spirally wound the tabs are properly separated at the top
of the coil.
Testing
The finished battery is tested for voltage, capacity, charge rate acceptance, cycle
life, accelerated life tests, storage, overcharge, normal temperature operation, low
temperature cranking, and shock and vibration. The detailed test procedures for au-
tomotive testing are in the specifications of the Battery Council International (BC!)
and the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) ( 117). Other battery test procedures
are indicative of a specialized application or general all-round use. After termination
of testing, the test specimens are disassembled and critically examined by chemical,
physical, and metallurigical means to obtain further insight into battery design and
performance and manufacturing methods.
D;
I
I
I
I
t9
I
I
Vol. 3 BATTERIES, SECONDARY (LEAD-ACID) 659
The SAE (118) has produced a different test procedure for battery-powered ve-
hicles; and the use of a test bed vehicle, its principle electrical components, and the
performance data acquired using SAE J227 have been described (ll9).
Applications
From the market analysis given on pp. 570-571 it is obvious that automotive
batteries have the lion's share of the market. Other types of lead-acid batteries, such
as sealed and small maintenance-free varieties, are making inroads into areas where
other types of batteries traditionally have been dominant.
The possibility of using lead-acid batteries for utility load leveling and peaking
has been reported ( 120). This study applies state-of-the-art tubular positive lead-acid
battery technology to estimate the selling prices for one 2500 cycle, 10 MW, 100 MW-h
load-leveling battery and two 2000 cycle, 20 MW peaking batteries delivering 60 and
100 MW-h. Accessories for the batteries judged vital to meeting the required perfor-
mance and life requirements are described and priced. These prices, including
transportation and installation, are respectively $62, $73, and $65/kW-h.
Since the passage of Public Law 94-4 I 3 (I 21) requiring the assessment oft.he need
for electric-powered or electric hybrid vehicles, there has been a renewed interest in
this field. Undoubtedly, other batteries besides lead-acid will be evaluated; but most
of the operational data have been obtained with lead-acid batteries (122-124). The
requirements for batteries that will be used in electric vehicles have been described
by Schwartz (125) and an excellent study on battery-operated electric vans (126) is
comprehensive in its treatment of the engineering design aspects.
Two articles evaluate t.he electric vehicle battery research status and give a
complete assessment of the technology (127-128).
BIBLIOGRAPHY
"Batteries, Electric (Lead-Acid Storage)" in f,,'C'/' 1st ed., Vol. 2, pp. :i,lO-:iGo, by ,Joseph A. Orsino and
Thomas C. Lynes, National I,ead Company: ··Secondary Cells, 1,ead-Acid" under "Batteries and Electric
Cells, Secondary" in EC'/' 2nd ed., Vol.:~. pp. 249-271, by ,Joseph A. Orsino, Nationul Lead Company.
I. The World Battery Industry-A Multiclic11t Study, Arthur D. Little, Inc., Cambridge, J'vlaRR., ,June
1976, p. 12.
2. Autonwtive Hat/cries-Their Selection and Care, Consumer Information Series, No. l, Genernl
Services Administration, Washington, D.C., Nov. l971.
3. K. Eberts and 0. Jache in Lead 6.5 (Proceedings 2nd International Confl'rcncc on Lead-Amheim,
Belgium), Pergamon Press. Inc., Elmsford, N.Y., 1967, p. 199.
4. U.S. Pat. 3,711,332 (Jan. 16, 1973), S. Bastacky.
5. G. Plante, Recherches sur /'l?lectrici/€, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, Fr., 1883, pp. 35-36, 40.
6. G. Smith, Storage Batteries, 2nd ed., Pitman Publishing Corporntion, Belmont, Calif., 1971, pp.
3-4.
7. G. W. Vinal, Storage Batteries, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1955, pp. 1-6.
8. H. Bode, Lead-Acid Batteries (transluted by R. J. Bradd and K. V. Kordesch), John Wiley & Sons,
Inc., New York, 1977, pp. 1-3.
9. E. J. Wade, Secondary Ratteries, The Electrician Printing and Publishing Company Ltd., London,
Eng., 1902, p. 19.
10. M. Arendt, Storage Batteries, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., New York, 1~28, pp. 5-6.
11. J. H. Gladstone and A. Tribe, Nature (London) 27,583 (1883).
12. Ref. 7, pp.174-178.
13. W. H. Beck and w·. F. K. Wynne-Jones, Trans. Faraday Soc. 50, 136 {1954).
14. A. K. Covington, J. V. Dobson, and \V. F. K. Wynne-Jones, Trans. Faraday Soc. 61, 2050 (1965).
r·-------------------~-----~
I
I
I
I
••
KIRK-OTHMER
ENCYCLOPEDIA OF
CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY
A WILEY-INTERSCIENCE PUBLICATION
John Wiley & Sons
THIRD EDITION
VOLUME 3
ANTIBIOTICS (PHENAZINES)
TO
BLEACHING AGENTS
NEW YORK • CHICHESTER • BRISBANE TORONTO
Ed
He
off
Do
off
Ch
Mic
GIE
Ca,
Ma
Da
Copyright© 1978 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
All rights reserved. Published simultaneously in Canada.
Reproduction or translation of any part of this work
beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the
1976 United States Copyright Act withoot the permission
of the copyright owner is unlawful. Requests for
permission or further information should be addressed to
the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Dal.a:
Main entry under title:
Encyclopedia of chemical technology.
At head of title: Kirk-Othmer.
"A Wiley-Interscience publication."
Includes bibliographies.
1. Chemistry, Technical-Dictionaries. I. Kirk,
Raymond Eller, 1890-1957. II. Othmer, Donald Frederick,
1904-III. Grayson, Martin. IV. Eckroth, David.
V. Title: Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical tech-
nology.
TP9.E685 1978 660'.0.1 7?. [5820
ISBN 0-471-02039-7
Printed in the United States of America
I
•\
I
3 BATTERIES, SECONDARY (LEAD-ACID) 649
Mathematical Modeling of the Lead-Acid Ballery. The lead dioxide electrode has
been modeled by Simonsson (51) and by Micka and Rousar (52), and the physical
processes in the pores of the lead-acid electrodes have been examined by Stein (53). These papers examine in depth a number of factors which can affect the extent of
utilization of a battery as a function of discharge rate.
Material Fabrication and Manufacturing Processes
The components of a lead-acid battery are: container (case, cover, and vent
plugs); and cell: plates (positive, lead dioxide (Pb02) on lead grid; negative, lead (Pb)
on lead grid), separators, and sulfuric acid solution (H2S04). They are shown in Figures
1-4 and, as noted, there are varied configuration possibilities for the container and
the plates.
Container. The materials used for containers used depends on the application,
eg, polypropylene and vulcanized rubber for automotive batteries, polystyrene for
stationary batteries, polycarbonate for a large single cell, and ABS plastic and drawn
steel cans for sealed lead-cells. All plastic and rubber containers are molded.
The container serves to hold the battery contents without deformation, to allow the cell plates to rest on the bottom ridges (space for active material to settle during
the life of the battery to prevent shorting), and to separate the cells, in some cases,
by compartment partitions.
Physical qualities are required of the container are: to resist attack by sulfuric
acid solution and the battery components, lo be nonporous, to.be nonreactive, and
to withstand extremes of heal and cold, as well as shock and vibration.
..
For the battery designs in Figures 1-3, the covers are usually molded of the cor-responding case material, and the vent plugs are frequently made of molded poly-
styrene. Other c<imhinations are possible, eg, containers molded of polyethylene or
I
I
I
I
polypropylene mated with covers of high-impact rubber, for use in industrial batteries.
The cover is heat-bonded to the case, if it is plastic, and sealed with asphalt or
epoxy-resin adhesive if it is vulcanized rubber. After the cover is fitted over the ter-minal posts, an acid-tight seal is made between the terminal posts and the cover either
by a rubber gasket or by lead-burning the posts to the lead inserts in the cover. With
this final step the container is sealed; subsequently it is checked with air pressure to determine leaks in the case. Except for maintenance-free batteries, vent plugs are
usually inserted into the cover to facilitate the adding of water, to vent gases, and
prevent electrolyte leakage. The gelled electrolyte lead-acid battery, shown in Figure
3, is a sealed maintenance-free type (no water or sulfuric acid solution need be added
during the life of the battery), and requires a pressure relief valve (self-resealing) to
vent gases during excessive charging currents.
The sealed, maintenance-free, lead-acid cell shown in Figure 4 utilizes a different
approach to the usual lead-acid battery packaging. The spiral wound battery plates
are encased in a polypropylene liner. Lead posts are welded to the plate tabs, and the
electrical connection is made to these lead posts through the polypropylene top by
means of a blind rivet. The polypropylene top is bonded to the liner, _creating the leak-proof seal. Sulfuric acid is injected into the sealed container through a Bunsen-
type valve that normally serves as a vent. The completed cell is placed in a metal can
with a plastic top, and the can edges are rolled over the top creating the finished, sealed
cell.
650 BATTERIES, SECONDARY (LEAD-ACID)
There are many patents on the battery container and its components, eg, plate
shock supports (54), terminal post-to-cover assembly (55-56), cover-to-case assembly
(57), and sealed lead-acid cell design (21;58).
Plate Fabrication. The plate fabrication and material manufacturing process flow
diagram is shown in Figure 6 (59). The individual processing steps are described in
the following section.
Grid. The lead alloy grid is the mechanical framework or support for the active
material (PbO2 or Pb) of the plates, and conducts the current to and from these active
materials. The current distribution must be uniform throughoutthe active material
mass; otherwise, the active material would harden unevenly and result in less efficient
utilization and reduced life of the plate. The importance of grid conductivity for
lead-acid cells has been discussed (60).
The grid must possess sufficient stiffness to prevent damage or distortion during
the casting, plate pasting, and battery fabrication operations. During the life of the
battery the grid must bear significant loads such as active material weight, its own
weight, and stresses due to corrosion. The required grid strength is reported to be on
the order of 40 X 106 N/m2 (5802 psi) UTS (ultimate tensile strength). The UTS for
pure lead is 14 X 106 N/m2 (2031 psi) whereas the highest strength attained for lead
alloys is in the range 65-85 X 106 N/m2 (9,428-12,328 psi) (61).
The grid must be corrosion-resistant. There is an interruption of the current path
if grid lattice members are broken or penetrated; the active material is isolated or shed
from the grid and subsequently lost for electrochemical reaction'.
Many types of grids are used depending on the battery application; some varieties
are shown in Figure 7. Currently, most battery grids are cast (Fig. 7a and b), but me-
chanically formed grids (Fig. 7c-f) are beginning to make their appearance in spe-
cialized applications (62). In general, the positive and negati,·e grids are of the same
design (except for the tubular positive grid which uses an automotive type grid
counterpart) and since the negative is not subjected to corrosion, it may be thinner
and lighter than a corresponding positive electrode. The electrical contact lugs extend
upward beyond the grid.
Oxide
manufacturing
Paste
mixing
Pastinb( '--·•
Grid
casting
I
Plate -· curing
Plate
formation
Figure 6. Plate fabrication and material manufacturing process flow diagram (S9).
652 BATTERIES, SECONDARY (LEAD-ACID)
Potential distribution in grids (63-65) has been evaluated and the results put into
practice (66). Some recent papers (67-68) deal with the innovative grid structures that
incorporate element members positioned to optimize current flow patterns. Now
appearing on the scene are lightweight, economical grids for the negative plate made
of ABS plastic grids coated with lead (69) and a grid frame structure of polystyrene
interwoven with lead strands (70). Both examples incorporate lead terminal connectors
in their design for easily soldering to one another, or to current collectors.
Material. ,I'Ji.e·lead alliiycont,iiLning a"ntimony1(2~12.wt %)],as found wii:le ac-
:-ceptan·ce~as griifinaterial (see Antimony). Antimony hardens the lead and improves
its castability. This is necessary because pure lead is difficult to cast and is easily de-
formed. Positive grid growth and corrosion are also retarded by antimony. Antimony
migrates from the positive grid alloy into the positive (PbO2) paste and alters the paste
morphology. The result is an increase in paste adhesion cycling characteristics, thus
prolonged battery life. Unfortunately, when the antimony leaves the positive'grid alloy,
it can also enter the electrolyte and subsequently plate onto the negative paste (Pb).
This plating is detrimental because it increases self-discharge of the negative plate
during open-circuit stand. Equally detrimental is that antimony lowers the hydrogen
overvoltage on the negative plate; this interferes with the charging process because
hydrogen is liberated in preference to the reduction of PbSO4. Additional current will
be needed to charge the plate because some current is being wasted for electrolysis
of water. Both the self-discharge reaction and the waler decomposition process con-
tribute to the water loss from the battery. Alloys containing a small amount of anti-
mony (low antimony alloys) are used to minimize the above detrimental effects (71-75).
'Low antimony lead.alloys (1-4 wt%) containing 0:02\vt % selenium are used to improve
·-----. -·• L ----- - - -. . their characteristics, ie, the antimony poisoning of the negative plate is decreased and
there is reduced water consumption (76). These alloys have improved castability as
well as enhanced corrosion resistance, especially where long-time overcharge is con-
cerned. The result is an antimony lead alloy with the desirable electrochemical char-
acteristics of regular antimony lead alloys.
The~lead·alloy·containing·smallamo"tfrifs:Ofcalcium (0.075 wt%) is·used ·for _.....:..__-~-c:;c-· -____... •• ---..,___ --,
tmaiiitenance;free application_s'. This alloy is more difficult to cast than. low anti-
mony-lead alloys, and the grids formed from this alloy have a lower self-discharge rate
and a minimal water loss during charging compared to the lead-antimony alloy. The
battery containing the lead-calcium alloy does not give as much cycle service as one
using the lead-antimony alloy. However, if the service life is such that the battery
floats, ie, charges at a constant voltage level, or if the depth of discharge(% capacity
utilization) is not very deep, these batteries can give superior life (77).
rAn·other·maintenance-free·lead·alloy contains·strohtium, and this alloy is claimed
to h~v-~ aTl the desirable properties ofcalcium butis easi~r and more economical to
handle than lead-calcium alloys (66).
Otlier additives·to the lead·alloys~eg; arsenic (0.5-0.7 wt%) and silv_er (0.l-0.15
wt%), inhibit gi-id growth on ~overcharge and redu~e positive grid corrosion. TellUfjiim
(0.05-0.06 we%) is beneficial to overcharge resistance,t:!:!~1 added to a lead ;noy pro-
duces well-defined castings that are readily adapted to mass production techniques .'
(74). .
The proper selection of the lead alloy depends on the intended use and,economics:
of the lead-acid battery application. The metallurgical and electrochemical aspectf
of lead alloys are discussed in a very comprehensive manner (72,78-81) and the prese~\
BELT,
I, AND
:::UNORIUM
"schist and phyllonite,
dstone, marble lenses
ocally abundant potas-
tional with calc-silicate
amphibolite. Contains
rated; minor layers of
ilimanite occur locally;
quartzite, calc-silicate
:red; minor layers and
:a schist. and granitic
1e and intrusive rock;
:a schist, calc-silicate
1osses of metadiorite
·;d to ,;1ussive; mega-
7ist. arnphibolite, and
·1ite schist. contains
E SCHIST -Meta-
tional with muscovite-
TE SCHIST -Meta-
1ational with amphibo-
1nitic rock
.:line porphyroblasts
-ock. metaconglorner-
·mitic rock
1d interlayered biot"1te
1atod to massive, con-
megacrysts of quartz
)d. granodioriiic, mig-
1holite
:) -Megacrystic. in
.L0,7.1) ~ Massive to
.:aring on east side
:i~:rian, ~w9 rny: 1 J) -
1ted: contains biotite
II -Poorly foliated;
1ml]
I CZfv \
CZq
Jd-\,
PLPg
DSg
00gb
DOg
[la
F-",:r/z9,;1 t~1~ ... ~X ,,-_JJ
PzZg I
1-~I
El'i1I
CZg I
STATE OF NORTH CAROLl
JAMES G. MARTIN, GOVERNOR
CHARLOTTE AND MIL TON BEL TS
METAMORPHIC ROCKS
FINE-GRAINED BIOTITE GNEISS -Massive to strongly foliated; minor layers of amphibolite and n 1Jscovite schist
FELSIC MICA GNEISS-lnterlayered with biotite and hornblende gneiss and schist
BIOTITE GNEISS AND SCHIST -lnequigranular and megacrystic; abun-dant potassic feldspar and garnet; interlayered and gradational with calc-silicate rock. sillimanite-mica schist. mica schist, and amphibolite Contains small masses of granitic rock
METAVOLCANIC ROCK-lnterbedded fels,c to ma!Jc tuffs and llowrock
MAFIC METAVOLCANIC ROCK -Metamorphosed basaltic to andesitic luffs and flows, grayish green to black. Locally includes hypabyssal intrusives and minor felsic metavolcanic rock
FELSIC METAVOLCANIC ROCK -Metamorphosed dacitic to rhyolitic flows and tuffs, _light gray to greenish gray; minor mafic and intermedi-ate metavolcanic rock
QUARTZITE -Massive to well folia:_ed; contains andalusite. kyanite. or sillimanite. chloritoid, and pyrite
PHYLLITE ANO SCHIST -Minor biotite, pyr-te, and sillitnanite: inc!udes minor quartzite
INTRUSIVE ROCKS
DIABASE -Dikes, gray to black
GRANITIC ROCK (Pennsylvanian to Permian, 265-325 my; ! i:·I -Megacrystic to equigranular. Churchlanci Plutonic Suite (Western group) -Churchland, Landis, and Mooresville intrusives
GRANITE OF SALISBURY PLUTONIC SUITE (Devonian to Silurian. 385-415 my; 5) -Pink, massive to weakly foliated. Gold Hill, Kannapolis, Salisbury, Southmont, a_nd Yadkin intrusives
SYENITE OF CONCORD PLUTONIC SUITE (Silurian, 404 my; \I) -In-cludes the Concord ring dike
GAB BRO OF CONCORD PLUTONIC SUITE (Devonian to Orclovic,an, 399· 479 my: 24)-Barber, Concord, Farmington, Mecklenburg, and Wed-dington intrusives
GRANITIC ROCK -Locally pinkish gray, rrn1ss·1ve to weakly foliqted, contains hornblende
SHELTON GRANITE GNEISS (Silurian, 429 iny; :' ·1 -Poorly foliated. lineated granitic ·to quartz monzonitic gneiss
METAMORPHOSED QUARTZ DIORITE -l'oliaterJ to massive
METAMORPHOSED GABBRO AND DIORITE -Foliated to massive
METAMORPHOSEu MAFIC ROCK -Metagabbro, metadioritc, anrl rnafic plutonic-volcanic complexes
META-ULTRAMAFIC ROCK -Metamorphosed dunite and penclotite: serpentinite. soapsto·ne. ond other altered ulm:imafic r9ck. Only larger bodies shown
METAMORPHOSED GRANITIC ROCK ·-Megacrystic, well foliated locally contains hornblende
SVMROLS
CZmcl
CZfv
CZpll I
,lei-, i i ' -·---·---·---•
PPg
LPgb
-::-::--:;·--/\ I ?1 1-.,_ .. ~4Q,~ I '.~1,.:J
' I i PzZg I
IJl1
CZg
(
~
f,.
r,
1,
r•.
'\
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
S. Thomas Rhodes, Secretary
Division of Land Resources
Stephen G. Conrad, Director and State Geologist
Compiled by
The North Carolina Geological Survey
Philip M. Brown, Chief Geologist
Edward R. Burt, III
P. Albert Carpenter, III
Rebecca M. Enos
Billie J. Flynt, Jr.
Patricia E. Gallagher
Charles W. Hofhnan
Carl E. Merschat
William F. Wilson
Charles C. Almy, Jr.
J. Robert Butler
Paul D. Fullagar
Richard Goldsmith
Robert D. Hatcher, Jr.
S. Duncan Heron, Jr.
and
John M. Parker, III
State Geologic Map Coordinator
in association with
The State Geologic Map Advisory Committee
J. Wright Horton, Jr. Thomas E. Shufflebarger, Jr.
Roy L. Ingram Norman F. Sohl
Stuart W. Maher Scott W. Snyder
Richard L. Mauger Edward F. Stoddard
James A. Miller Frederick M. Swain
Loren A. Raymond Daniel A. Textoris
Paul A. Thayer
H. D. Wagener
Lauck W. Ward
Walter H. Wheeler
' Steven P. Yurkovich
Victor A. Zullo
__ ,,...,....,._..._~·•u•,.--•--~,.--·-• • .,
l l
j
I
I I 5 I • I
35"-
G E 0 R G A
EXPLANATION
~ MURPHY BELT. D INNER PIEDMONT BELT ~ TRIASSIC BASINS
1~~~1 HOT SPRINGS WINDOW D KINGS MOUNTAlt-l BELT
DURHAM } SUB-BASINS
SANFORD
)roMWitl GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN WINDOW D SAURATOWN MOUNTAll'!S ANTICLINORIUM WADESBORO BASIN
~ SM\TH RIVER ALLOCHTHON CJ CHARLOTTE BELT
DAN RIVER BASIN (ORB)
DAVIE BASIN (OB)
~ BLUE RIDGE BELT
CJ CHAUGA BELT
1~;1
1~~B~i,
MILTON BELT
CAROLINA SLATE BELT
~ RALEIGH BELT· .
CJ EASTERN SLATE BELT
. ~
19 ~ # ..:.,;:~-
!.<,Q .;,.,~-,,
<f' ~. ' ;.0~~
--:;/!_(>?.t
_, ____ I _____ _
ar -22
~ •. -.~;~<,[:,.': ·"" ~-;:.. __ .. -, "\,.:,·
35"-1
a,• "
37
SYMBOLS
-----Contact
Fault
Pre-metamorphic thrust fault
Post-metamorphic thrust fault
Anticline
Syncline
17 Tectonic feature
Well location and basement
rock type
Gneiss
Granite
Schist
Volcanic rock
.,
,0 20 30 40 Miles
10 o 10 20 30 40 50 Kilometer!
Overturned anticline --7(X}()~ Contour in feet below mean sea level on pre-Meso~oic basement rock
----~ Direction of plunge
l. Mary King Mountain fault
Ferree.\, J.T., 1%9, Stratigraphy and structure or the
Murphy belt In the Murphy, North C-.1ol1na 7'h'
Quadrangle: Geological Society Amerki!: Abstracts
with programs, Part 4, p. 23-24.
2. Hayesville fault
Hatcher, R.D., Jr., 1978, Tectonics o! the western Pied-
mont and Blue Ridge, $OU them App11lach:...,r.s: review
and speculation: American Joumol Science, v. 278,
p. 276-304. (Se,, also: Keith, Arthur, 1907, Desc:rip•
·· _, ,L -M--•~'-~1~ n.,.,,fr,.nnl,,_ North Carolina:
MAP SHOWING MAJOR LITHO-TECTONIC FEATURES
REFERENCES FOR TECTONIC FEATURES
10. Unnamed fault and
11. Unnamed fault
Ranklo, D.W., Espenshade, G.H., and Neuman, RB.,
1972, Geologic map of the west hall of the Wtnston-
Salem Quacfrangle, North Carolina, Virginia, i!:nd
T ennes.see: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous
Geologi(-.al Investigations Map 1-709-A
12. Unnamed fault
Abbott, RN., Jr., and Ra_vmond. LA. 191:>4, The Ashe
Metamorphic Suite, northwest North Carolina: meta•
morphism and observ;,Uons on geo!oglc hlstoiy:
• ---• "••~~•n " ?M n 35tl-375,
18. Dan Rivflr fault
$tone, RW., 1912, Coal on Dan River, North Carolina:
U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 471-8. p. 137-169.
19. Newton anvfcrm
Goldsmith, Ric:hard, M~ton, D.J., and Horton, J. W., Jr.,
in press, Goologic map cf Charlott€ 1° x ?." Quadran-
gle, North Carolina and South Carolina: U.S. Geolo-
gical Survey Miscellaneous Geological hvest!gations
Map 1,1251-E. .
20. Eu!ola fault
Golf9StG~~tm"!
1;:1· ,~/c~~~o~~~~: ~~;d:
-•-"'--~'-rA,,.i;,.,,. ,,,.,,-1 South C,uolina: Geolo-
,r
-;rv __ L
76"
I
. '" ,,
28. New London syncline and
29. Troy anticline
Conley, J.F., 1962, Geoloqy of the Albemarle Qu;,d.
rangle, North Carolina: -North Caro~na Division cl
Mineral Resources Bulletin 75, 26 p. .
30. Colon cross-structure and
31. Jonesboro fault
Campbell, MR, and Klmball, KW., 1923, The Deep
River coal field of North Carolina: North Carolina
. Geological and Economic Sur,ey Bu!ietin 33, 95 p.
32. Raleigh anticline
Fortson, C.W., Jr., 1958, Geology oftheCrabtn,,• ·:,eek
area. northwest of Raleigh. North -~roli~~-·,'.'.I:?~
I 78'
MORPHIC FACIES
~?((~•\'?}~
\ 0
\-
/
GEOLOGIC MAP OF NORTH CAROLINA
1985
Scale 1:500,000
I inch eQ11als apprnxirnate!y 8 miles
0 10 30
:o 10 20 30 40 50 Kilometres "--=-o:E=====l:===:=i== ===~===='3·
40 Miles ::J
'·::'~ ,,._, :-:1:1ssiv<:. gror11t:c :o ,; ,;,r;;,
_ :.::.m:r:ion
·,·,hr1c1n to Q;dov10:in, l+'.£-!il+O
;oh;;;c,d :o r:--.;,ssive. lr.r:luties
· :) -Monzonitic to grano-
. .:;hosed durnie. io-:al per1ciotiie.
!•:;1:1af1-: roC':. On1v larger bod,;::s
,,te Proterozoic. 680-710 rr•1: , ,1)
i~
\LoW
':.° 1'::
,;
I\ ,i:Jifi?"f'.~:'is'!Pt
) ;,,
Conwc:
Fault
~ault -Showing relative hori10ntal movo::mc:nt
Normal fault -Bar and ball on downth~own side
Overturned normal fault
Thrust !ault -Sawtee!h on upper plate
Overturned thrust fault
80°
V
SYMBOLS
Ovcr:u.ncll .:inticlinc -Showing c,rec:1011 ol d,p o: limbs
Syncline -Showing direction of pl,j,1ge
Di~e -D.ished where iderred lrom <JCrom,,oneiic data
Scarp --Hachured on downslope side
fj~ Zone of mylonitization
...... ~
R
fv • •,
-·---<,;/ ; ~~/--. ... -:
G
Pl/·!::': HALL FORMAT IUi·!--Sc1nds;one. rnur:J:;: ·1ellowish orange to bro,·,:n
CHATHAM GROUP r~ CHAl~AM Gf~OUI--'. UND!"•/IDEC> ---Co11gl0::1,::1;c,
s;,:,11e. ;me rnudsicnc. Co;-:glor:--.e:il;e ;rnd la:•~:
~ ~
\(::;;--.
Ar:.-o~ic sandstone. tiln. mcd•~1:1-to \·ery c,_,.,
S;;ndstone and mudstonc w1\h ,r,1n 1n1crbc1
l!rncstone
Ar"osic sandstone and clayey Siindstone. b·
brown ta dark-gray sandstone and mua:.:r
S.L.NFORO FORMATION -Conglomera:c. /c
and mudstone
CUiv\NOCK FORMATION-S;:mdstont~ :;r,d ,·
coal beds and carbonaceous shale. Grad<)<
formations.
PEKIN FORMATION -Conglomera1e. seine:
INTRUSIVE ROCKS
DIABASE -Dikes and sills, gray to bk1c:
N
-•~-.. _. :~~ ·r~:~~:
-::,:,;
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
THE HYDROGEOLOGIC FRAMEWORK AND A RECONNAISSANCE OF GROUND-WATER QUALITY
IN THE PIEDMONT PROVINCE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
WITH A DESIGN FOR FUTURE STUDY
By Douglas A. Harned
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Water-Resources Investigations Report 88-4130
Raleigh, North Carolina
1989
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
Abstract . .
Introduction
Purpose and scope
Method of study
Acknowledgments
Description of study area.
Climate .
Topography.
Geology
Soils .
Land use.
CONTENTS
Hydrogeologic framework and conceptual model of the flow system.
Regolith unsaturated zone
Regolith saturated zone
Transition zone .
Fractured bedrock
Flow hypotheses
Transition zone studies
Potential sources of ground-water contamination.
Water-quality data base.
Data analysis. . · .
Water-quality data.
Independent variables
Analysis of variance.
Need for additional study.
Network design.
Data collection
Sampling methods.
Special studies .
Summary and conclusions.
References ...... .
iii
Page
1
2
3
3
4
5
5
5
7
10
11
12
12
13
17
20
22
24
26
27
32
33
33
36
39
40
43
44
46
47
51
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
MWS445¥S+
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
DONAUl PAUL HODEL, Secretary
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Dallas L. Peck, Director
For additional information
write to:
Copies of this report can
be purchased from:
District Chief
U.S. Geological Survey
Post Office Box 2857
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
U.S. Geological Survey
Books and Open-File Reports
Federal Center, Box 25425
Denver, Colorado 80225
i
f:
I ..
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I ----
THE HYDROGEOUJGIC FRAM.E\JORK AND A RECONNAISSANCE OF GROUND-lo/ATER QUALITY
IN THE PIEDMONT PROVINCE OF NORTH CAROLINA, lo/ITH
A DESIGN FOR FUTURE STUDY
by Douglas A. Harned
ABSTRACT
The U.S. Geological Survey is investigating the relation of ground-
water quality and land use in the regolith and fractured rock ground-water
system of the North Carolina Piedmont. The initial phase of this study
provides a description of the ground-water flow system and a review of
available ground-water data and formulates hypotheses that guide the design
of a water-quality monitoring network for study of selected areas.
In the Piedmont, the solid igneous and metamorphic bedrock grades
upward into unweathered fractured rock that is cover·ed by a transition zone
of highly-fractured, partially weathered rock, clay-rich saprolite, and the
soil. The fractured bedrock, transition zone, saprolite, and soil make up a
complex flow system .
A review of available ground-water quality data shows a lack of
information abqut organic compounds and trace metals and changes in ground-
water quality with depth. Land use, soils, and geology significantly
influence ground-water quality.
The hypotheses that need to be tested in the next study phase are:
(1) that ground-water contamination can be related to land use, and (2) that
the transition zone between bedrock and regolith serves as a primary
transmitter of contaminants.
Monitoring of basins containing industrial, urban, residential, and
agricultural land uses in future studies will help define the relation of
ground-water quality to land use. Water quality at different depths in the
flow system ard in streams during base flow needs to be identified.
1
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA
The Piedmont of North Carolina (fig. 1) is part of the Piedmont
province as described by Fenneman (1938) that extends from New Jersey to
Alabama and lies between the Blue Ridge and Coastal Plain provinces. The
Piedmont province of North Carolina, shown in figure 1, is approximately
20,000 square miles or about 23 percent of the total Piedmont region of the
eastern United States. The Piedmont widens to the south, reaching its
maximum width of nearly 200 miles in North Carolina. The province occupies
approximately 41 percent of the State.
Climate
The North Carolina Piedmont lies within a humid, subtropical climate
region. The temperature is moderate, seldom dropping to zero degrees
Fahrenheit in_ the winter and occasionally rising above 100 degrees in the
summer. Mean annual temperatures range from 58 to 61 degrees Fahrenheit,
with January the coldest and July the hottest month (Eder and others, 1983).
The growing season, which is defined as that period without killing frosts,
lasts from mid-April to the end of October, an average of about 200 days.
The average annual precipitation in the Piedmont of North Carolina
ranges from 43 to 60 inches. Generally, the greatest monthly precipitation
occurs during the summer months, and the least precipitation occurs in
October or November. Although rainfall is heaviest in the summer,
evaporation.and transpiration losses are greatest then also; consequently,
there is little ground-water recharge during. this season.
Topography
The Piedmont is an ancient erosional surface developed, for the most
part, on crystalline igneous and metamorphic rock. The Piedmont province is
bordered on the east by the Fall Line, which is the western boundary of the
Coastal Plain province, and on the west by the Blue Ridge front (fig. 1).
The Fall Line represents the boundary where the soft, sedimentary rocks of
the Coastal Plain give way to the harder crystalline rocks of the Piedmont.
The Blue Ridge front is a prominent topographic feature generally thought to
have resulted from displacement associated with faulting.
5
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
0
0
EXPLANATION
~ Piedmont
100 200 300 400 MILES
100 200 300 400 KILOMETERS
FLA.
Figure 1.--The Piedmont province of the eastern United States and the
physiographic provinces of North Carolina .
6
~;r =•: .. . ,.;~; r\
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r9
I
I
I
I
I
I
The Piedmont consists of low, rounded hills and long, rolling
northeast-trending ridges with up to a few hundred feet of local relief.
Land elevation gradually rises from about 150 feet above sea level along the
Piedmont's eastern boundary to 1,900 feet along the western boundary at the
foot of the Blue Ridge front.
The rolling topography is the result of streams acting on rocks of
unequal resistance. Isolated hills with swnmit heights standing above the
upland surface are remnants of extremely erosion-resistant rock. In
contrast to the topography of the crystalline-rock terrane of most of the
Piedmont, erosion has produced low lands in the soft sedimentary rocks of
the Triassic basins.
The typical Piedmont topographic surface described by Fenneman (1938)
is practically all hillside or valley side. The region has a well
integrated drainage system and, in nearly all aspects, qualifies as having
reached topographic maturity as defined by Thornbury (1954). LeGrand (1958
and 1984) notes that in the network of closely spaced perennial streams the
upland divide is everywhere less than a mile and commonly less than half a
mile from a valley.
Geology
The geology of the North Carolina Piedmont province is very complex;
the bedrock consists of folded and fractured metamorphosed sedimentary and
igneous basement rocks. Intruded into these metamorphic rocks are lesser
bodies of unmetamorphosed igneous rocks. Typical bedrock lithologies
include granite, gneiss, schist, quartzite., slate, and phyllite.
Downfaulted into the basement complex are several basins (Triassic basins),
which are grabens where sedimentary rock occurs.
The regional geology of the Piedmont basement is only generally
understood. The crystalline igneous and metamorphic sequences may have
undergone two or three regional metamorphic events and as many as four major
deformation events from the Precambrian through the Paleozoic. The complex
nature and variable degrees of metamorphism found in the Piedmont make
precise dating of these events impossible at present. More detailed
discussions of recent hypotheses for these events can be found elsewhere
7
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
(Ragland and others, 1983; Farrar, 1985; Russell and others, 1985; Wehr and
Grover, 1985). Various periods of plate tectonic activity, along with the
associated formation of rift margins, are believed to be responsible for
these events. The Piedmont can be divided into northeast trending parallel
geologic belts. Traversing from the southeast, the major geologic belts are
the Carolina slate belt, the Raleigh belt, the Charlotte belt, the Kings
Mountain belt, and the Inner Piedmont belt (Daniel, 1987).
The rock-type classification scheme based on lithologic and
geohydrologic properties developed by Da~iel (1987) for the Piedmont and
Blue Ridge provinces of North Carolina has been used in this study. The
near-surfece earth mater~als of the Piedmont consist of a three-stage system
which, from top to bottom, contains (1) a regolith zone, (2) a transition
zone, and (3) underlying fractured crystalline bedrock (fig. 2).
REGOLITH
Regolith
unsaturated zone
Regolith
saturated
zone
SOIL ZONE-
Lowest
water table
TRANSITION ZONE l {? (y ot:,a~ Weathered
bedrock, boulders
FRACTURED BEDROCK
/, \
I
I
'
I
I
I
(
/ 1 I
I
' ' ' __,_
' I
'
Unweathered bedrock
Sheet joint
Bedrock structure
I I
1 ,---<--Fracture
\
I I
I
Figure 2.--Conceptual structure of the Piedmont ground-water system
(modified from Heath, 1984).
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r"
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
Most Piedmont soils have formed largely from saprolite derived from the
underlying parent rocks. Some soils have developed on stream-valley
alluvium. Soil.s are a product of their local and regional environment.
Geology, geomorphology, and climate, in addition to topography, moisture,
and vegetation, influence the characteristics of soil cover. Combinations
of factors give rise to a number of diverse soils that fit into locally and
regionally recurring patterns.
Daniels and others (1984) classified four major soil systems within the
Piedmont based on the major kinds of bedrock:
1. "fhe felsic crystalline terrains composed largely of granite,
gneiss, mica gneiss, and schist;
2. The Carolina slate belt of bedded argillites, felsic volcanics,
and mafic volcanics;
3. The Triassic basins with mudstones, sandstones, shales, and
conglomerates; and
4. The mixed mafic and felsic rocks; a complex area of granites,
diorites, gabbros, and other rocks.
In the felsic crystalline area, most deeper soil horizons are clayey,
but some soils originating from the coarser grained rocks, such as granite,
have clay-loam or loamy-sand deeper horizons. Soils derived from Carolina
slates have high silt contents, overlie relatively thin saprolite layers in
comparison with the felsic crystalline area, and have low permeability in
the deeper horizons. Triassic basin soils have more swelling clays in their
deeper horizons than other soils. The mafic soils (from mafic dikes) are
plastic and usually a reddish color.
In this study, physical parameters of soils, including permeability and
available water capacity provided by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service
(1978), were used to construct the detailed data base necessary to compare
ground-water quality characteristics with soil type. These parameters have
been incluc\ed in the data set but were not used in the data analysis.
10
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Land Use
Land Use Data Analysis maps (LUDA maps; Anderson and others, 1976)
provide data on a regional scale for land use in the Piedmont. These maps
were generated in the early 1970's using remote-sensing satellite data.
Estimates of the relative amount of area covered by the different land-
use types were determined from LUDA maps. Land-use types lying along the
78-, 80-, and 82-degree meridians, and along the 35-and 36-degree parallels
were determined from the North Carolina LUDA maps. First, the distances
along each latitude or longitude line for each land-use type were measured
and totaled. Then, the total for each land use was divided by the total for
all the lines sampled to give a percent of the total area covered by each
land use. The result of these calculations are shown in table 1. This
analysis indicates that about 65 percent of the North Carolina Piedmont land
area is forest, about 25 percent is crop land, and about 6 percent is urban
and residential.
Table 1.--Approximate percentages of major land uses
of the Piedmont of North Carolina
[LUDA, Land Use Data Analysis]
LUDA
land use
Residential and farm buildings
Commercial and services
Industrial
Piedmont
percent
4.2
.67
.23
Transportation, communications, and utilities .34
Mixed urban
Other urban or built-up land
Cropland and pastures
Deciduous forest
Evergreen forest
Mixed forest
Reservoirs
Forested wetland
Transitional areas
Other
Land-use data from Anderson and others, 1976.
11
.32
.59
25
24
10
32
1.2
.85
.36
.24
I
I
I
I
B
D
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
HYDROGEOLOGIC FRAMEIJORK AND-CONCEPTUAL HODEL OF THE FLOII' SYSTEM
Heath's (1984) concept of the ground-water system for the Piedmont and
Blue Ridge provinces has been adopted as the conceptual model for this study
with slight modifications to emphasize the transition zone between the
regolith zone and the bedrock.
The fundamental structure of the ground-water system is shown in
figure 2. The components of the system are:
1. The unsaturated zone in the regolith, which generally
_contains the organic layers of the surface soil;
2. The saturated zone in the regolith;
3. The transition zone between the regolith and bedrock; and
4. The fractured crystalline bedrock system.
Regolith Unsaturated Zone
The unsaturated zone extends from the land surface down to the water
table, which is the top of the saturated zone. The pore spaces of the
regolith in the unsaturated zone contain both air and water. The
unsaturated zone usually ranges from 5 to 50 feet in thickness. Daniel
(1987) found a mean depth to the water table of 31.3 feet in an examination
of 2,326 Piedmont wells. Water moves down from the land surface through the
soil zone by intergranular flow through the larger pore spaces and passages
left by burrows or decayed roots. Roots from surface vegetation can grow to
30 feet below land surface but more commonly spread laterally near the
surface. At the base of the soil zone, which is generally 3 to 8 feet
thick, the average grain size abruptly decreases with a corresponding
decrease in pore size as the water enters.the saprolite (C.C. Daniel, III,
U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 1985). At this point water
movement may also be diverted somewhat by relic structures of foliation or
folds in the saprolite, which are remnants from the parent rock.
The total porosity of soil is commonly around 55 percer.c, and its
specific yield is about 40 percent (Heath, 1983). Saprolite has a total
porosity of 35 to 50 percent near land surface (fig. 3), which decreases at
depth, and a specific yield of 20 percent (Daniel and Sharpless, 1983) .
12
...... ~.:-, :, , .
;i-~t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
fJ
60
•
•
50 Porosity • • • ..... --~-... ---t ~ --=·--.--'
40
" . l\ • \_ • • • • • ' >-!:: "' 0
\
\
a:
0 a. 30 \
.... z w (.) a: w a.
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
DEPTH. IN FEET
Figure 3.--Relation of porosity of saprolite
(after Stewart, 1962).
\
\
\ .
I
I
I
I
I
70
with depth
I Topsoil in Piedmont soils to. a depth of 7 to 10 inches was reported to have
a mean hydraulic conductivity of 5.7 inches per hour (11.4 feet per day),
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
and the subsoil, 7 to 20 inches below land surface, has a mean hydraulic
conductivity 1.8 inches per hour (3.6 feet per day) (Lutz, 1969). These
values are in line with the hydraulic conductivity values for saprolite
reported by Heath (1980) that range from 0.5 to 10 inchis per hour (1 to 20
feet per day). However, the hydraulic conductivity of saprolite is not the
same in all directions. This anistropy may take the form of preferential
permeability along the direction of relic structures within the saprolite.
Regolj.th Saturated Zone
The regolith saturated zone is that interval below the water table and
above the transition zone. Daniel has calculated the median saturated
13
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
thickness of the regolith and transition zone from records of 1,749 water-
supply wells in the Piedmont of North Carolina to be 13 feet (Daniel, 1987) .
The median saturated thickness was shown to be a function of topography:
beneath draws and valleys, it was 28 feet thick; below slopes and flats, it
was 15 feet; and beneath hills and ridges, it was 9 feet.
The saturated regolith provides the bulk of the water storage within
the Piedmont ground-water system (Heath, 1980). This concept is illustrated
in figure 4. In the Piedmont ground-water system, the regolith has a
specific yield of around 20 percent (Daniel and Sharpless, 1983), whereas
the porosity of the bedrock ranges from 0.01 to 2 percent (Heath, 1984).
The depth-porosity relation described by Stewart (1962) is shown in figure
3. The a~ount of ground water in storage as a function of the saturated
thickness of the regolith has been calculated by Daniel (C.C. Daniel, III,
U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 1985) and is presented as figure 5.
WELL -El
K
CTURES
_,_
Lowe.st water tablo
STORAGE
IN
BEDROCK
STORAGE
IN REGOLITH
Figure 4.--Water storage within, and the reservoir-pipeline
conceptual model of the Piedmont ground-water system
(modified from Heath, 1984).
14
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
w a: 0 <:
a: w Q_
(/) z 0 .J .J <:
('.)
u.
0
(/) z 0 ::;
.J ~
~
w
('.) <: a: 0 >-(/)
~ >->-<: ::;
w 0
.J ('.) CD w <: a: >-u. ffi 0 >-w <: (/)
3: ;;;
8
6
4
2
0
0
TOTAL WATER IN STORAGE
BELOW THE WATER TABLE
\
AVAILABLE
WATER
\
>-w <: 0 w <:
.J u.
CD a: <: :, >-(/)
a: 0 Wz >-<: <: .J 3:
I
10 20 30 40 so 60 70
SATURATED THICKNESS OF REGOLITH, IN FEET
Figure 5. --Relation of ground-water storage and saturated thi0ckness
(after C.C. Daniel, III, U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 1986).
As illustrated in figure 4, the regolith serves as a reservoir
supplying water to interconnected fractures within the bedrock. In general,
wells in the Piedmont are cased through the regolith, with open hole through
enough of the bedrock to intercept enough fractures to furnish acceptable
yields. The bedrock fractures serve as pipelines between the well and the
regolith reservoir.
The depth to water table is largely a function of topography. Based on
data from 2,326 water-supply wells, the median water level in wells located
in draws and valleys is 20 feet, in
and ridges 32 feet (Daniel, 1987).
slopes and flats 25 feet, and in hills
Depth to water table at
varies with ground-water recharge and continual discharge.
15
any one place
An example of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r9
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
the response of water level due to variation in rainfall is shown in figure
6. In this example, ground-water recharge (in excess of discharge)
resulting from heavy rains in late winter, when evapotranspiration is low,
is reflected by a peak in the water-table hydrograph appearing a few days
after heavy rainfall in late March. The time after a storm that the peak
appears in the water level is directly related to the vertical hydraulic
conductivity of the material in the unsaturated zone and the depth to water
table. The hydrograph also shows that little recharge took place during the
growing season (April through September) even though the area received
significant rainfall during these month&. The declining water level
indicates continuing ground-water discharge that is not equaled or exceeded
by rechar-ge until fall, when evapotranspiration is low. Similar seasonal
w u
"' "-a: :,
<n
O 2 z
"' ...J
~ 3
w
<D
>-4 w w "-
!c 5
_j
w > W 6 ...J
a: w
>-7 1
Well 10002
Bc_ __ L.__ _ __1 __ __1 __ _.J, __ _j, __ _,_ __ _,_ __ _L __ _L __ __.1. __ _i_ __ _J
<n w
I u
;;; 3
z
z-2
0
!:,
>:: (l_ u w a:
(l_
Precipitation at A!lonto
1980
Figure 6.--Response of water-level change to rainfall
(from Gressler and others, 1983).
16
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
·1
••
I
..
I
I
fluctuations of the water table are also shown in the hydrograph for a well
located in Iredell County, North Carolina (fig. 7) .
26
I-UJ 26 UJ u
UJ "' u. u. a: z :, 30 -. <fl
.J 0
UJ z >"' 32 ':j .J
a: ;:
UJ 0 3' I-.J
"' UJ ;: (D
36
197 2 1973 197 ◄ 197 5 f976 197 7 1978 1979· 1980 1961
Figure 7.--Seasonal fluctua~ions in water-table depth in a well
in Iredell County, North Carolina
(from LeGrand, 1984).
Transition Zone
At the base of the regolith there is generally a transition zone of
weathered rock, boulders, and saprolite. Careful augering of three wells
showed this transition zone to be approximately 15 feet thick at the
Guilford County, North Carolina, test site shown in figure 8 (C.C. Daniel,
III, U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 1985). This zone has been
found in Georgia, Maryland, and North Carolina and reported by Stewart
(1962), Nutter and Otton (1969), and Daniel (C.C. Daniel, III, U.S.
written commun., 1985), respectively.
permeable than the upper regolith and
They describe
slightly more
this Geological Survey,
zone as being more
permeable than the soil zone. This observation is substantiated by reports
from well drillers of so-called "first water" (C.C. Daniel, III, U.S.
Geological Survey, written commun., 1985) in drillers' logs (Nutter and
Otten, 1969) .
The high permeability of the transition zone is probably due to
incomplete weathering in th•a upper regolith. Chemical alteration of the
bedrock has progressed to a stage of minute fracturing of the crystalline
rock, yet it has not progressed so far that the rock minerals have been
altered to clays, which would clog the tiny fractures (C.C. Daniel, III,
17
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
830
Gu~Ja 7 _ __,a'--8 2 s
0 50 100 200 300 FEET
0 50 100 METERS
EXPLANATION
--830 --AL TITUOE CONTOUR~~ Shows land surtace altitude.
Contour interval 5 1eet. Datum is sea level -r--------r
Streamflow station (nonrecording)
Observation well and number (bedrock)
I I
I • N I
i I
Productlon well I
I
Fence L _____ ---!.
Site !ocation in Guilford Co, ====-=Road
Figure 8.--Locations of data-collection sites and topography at the
Greensboro-High Point Regional Airport test site
(from Daniel and Sharpless, 1983).
U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 1985). An idealized weathering
profile by Nutter and Otton shown in figure 9 illustrates the effect of
degree of weathering on permeability.
18
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
Soil zone
Clay, silt,
and sand
Residual
vein
Transition
zone Weathered
boulders
Unaltered
rock
~\\}/ \\// I 'V i~~~!i -.... --·· :-_
~~
<-~ ~--:< -~-
.. -:. ;.
. . . . --: "::::,
·: _.:.--..:. -. ---
/. ~·• ..:_.., . "
---
,.~ --.. --:-. .
-c;:c::~ . . . -
--:.~ ... --.-:'j_
.: :~-... ~.--~-
·.p·~i;"6J~~.
/
en w en <( w a: u :;;
(.') :;; a: w I >-<( w ;::
LL
0
w w a:
(.') w
0
RELATIVE INCREASES
PERMABILITY
z
Q en >-w u en <( <( a: w
LL ll:
>-u
<( :;;
...J u
Figure 9.--An idealized weathering profile through the
regolith showing relative permeability
(after Nutter and Otton, 1969).
The presence of a high-permeability zone on top of the bedrock may
create a zone of concentrated flow within.the ground-water system. Daniel
(C.C. Daniel, III, U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 1985) cites the
case where well drillers find water in the transition zone, .yet end up with
a dr.y hole after setting casing through the regolith and transition zone
into the unweathered bedrock. In this case, the ground water occurs
primarily in the transition zone, where there is poor connection between the
regolith reservoir, the bedrock fracture pipeline system: and the well.
Daniel comments that the transition zone may serve as an interval where
relatively rapid movement of contaminated ground water can take place .
19
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
•• ' .
I
I
I
..
I
I
Fractured Bedrock
Ground-water flow within the crystalline bedrock occurs within fracture
systems. LeGrand (1967) discussed what he considered to be the six common
types of fracture patterns (fig. 10) that influence yields to wells. These
fractures are reported to be more common near the surface and beneath
valleys, draws, and surface depressions (Heath, 1980), and are considered to
be zones of weakness that allowed the initial development of valleys and
draws at these locations. Fracture openings are wider near the bedrock
surface and decrease in size and number with depth due to increasing
lithostatic pressure.
1------------
-
A Untractured rock
3 oercent
t ,
,l1/
""\
/ /r / /
' / / I / /
D / I
32 percent
------i-----
~ ... ~)
B
20 percent
-----
E
25 percent
EXPLANATION
Water table
Rock fracture
..... 1._7 --
C
15 percent
F
5 percent
5 percent -Frequency of occurance for
each fracture system
Figure 10.--Six common types of fracture systems in the Piedmont
(from LeGrand, 1967).
20
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
Heath indicates that few fractures below 300 to 400 feet from land
surface contain subscantial amounts of water, and that those which do bear
water at depth are probably associated with faults. However, Gressler and
others (1983) found that for the Atlanta, Georgia, area, nearly horizontal
stress-relief fractures at depths of 400 feet or more were often associated
with high-yielding wells. When surface material is removed by erosion,
nearly horizontal stress-relief fractures develop and widen in response to
the reduction in compressional stress. Daniel also reports high-yielding
wells at depths over 500 feet in the North Carolina Piedmont (-Daniel, 1987).
Fractures are planar features oriented along zones of lithologic and
structural weakness. Water can move along.the fractures with relative ease
to discharge points such as wells or to natural discharge areas in stream
valleys. Non-horizontal fractures may account for dramatically asymmetrical
patterns of water-level decline that may be seen around a pumped well or the
more rapid movement of water and contaminants in one direction than in
another, creating aniostrophy in the bedrock aquifer. The hydrologic
conductivity of the fractured bedrock is generally 0.001 to 3 feet per day
(Heath, 1984). The primary porosity of the bedrock ranges from about 0.01
to 2 percent (Heath, 1984).
In general, the mineral assemblages determine the degree to which water
will dissolve aquifer material. For example, quartz is resistant to
chemical weathering and will dissolve much more slowly than less resistant
ferromagnesium minerals such as biotite and hornblende and numerous iron
minerals such as pyrite and magnetite. Generally, the mafic igneous rocks
such as diorite-gabbro contain more ferromagnesium minerals and are more
susceptible to chemical solution than the minerals of felsic rocks such as
granite. Weathering of the ferromagnesium minerals produce solution
openings and channels in the mafic rock units.
Ground.water from a typical granite, composed largely of sodium and
potassium feldspars, should have relatively high concentrations of sodium
bicarbonate. Calcium and magnesium bicarbonate concentrations can be high
in ground water moving through mafic rocks, such as gabbro, which is
composed largely of calcium feldspars and ferromagnesium minerals. Ground
water from certain metavolcanic and mica-schist units contain high
concentrations of iron (Hem, 1970). However, these simple relationships are
complicated if there is mixing of waters from adjacent rock types of
different compositions or if the host rock is intermediate in composition.
21
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Because the natural chemical quality of ground water is affected by the
minerals in the regolith and bedrock, which form the hydrogeologic framework
for the Piedmont ground-water system, the natural water quality should be
considered when attempting
from different land uses.
soils on the ground-water
of the report.
to determine water-quality differences resulting
The significance of the effects of geology and
quality are described in the data-analysis section
Flow Hypotheses
Several aspects of the ground-wateL flow system in the Piedmont are
particularly significant geochemically. In describing ground-water recharge
and discharge and the functions of a ground-water system, Heath (1983, p.
14) states:
Hydraulically, this system serves two functions:
it stores water to the extent of its porosity, and it
transmits water from recharge areas to discharge areas.
Thus, a ground-water system serves as both a reservoir
and a conduit.
Water enters ground-water systems in recharge areas
and moves through them, as dictated by hydraulic
gradients and hydraulic conductivities, to discharge
areas.
In the humid part of the country, recharge occurs
in all interstream areas--that is, in all areas except
along streams and their adjoining flood plains. The
streams and flood plains are, under most conditions,
discharge areas.
These general conditions are assumed to apply in the Piedmont of North
Carolina.
The generalized flow system in the Piedmont as represented in figure 11
occurs within a closely-spaced network of streams typical of the mature
topography of the Piedmont. Ground-water flow is toward these streams, and
the shape of the water table mimics the topography of the land surface,
22
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
EXPLANATION
~ General direction of ground-water movement
She-et Joints
Teetonk: Joints
Water table
Ground-w a !er
dlacharge area
Figure 11.--Generalized ground-water flow system in the Piedmont
(from Heath, 1980).
although with subdued relief. Thus, surface topography can be used to
predict the natural direction of ground-water flow. The distance between
the point where a drop of water or waste enters the system and the point
where it discharges into the stream down slope is commonly less than a half
mile (LeGrand, 1958). Most of the natural flow in the system is probably
confined to the upper 30 feet of bedrock, where fractures are concentrated,
and the overlying transition zone, which apparently has the highest
hydraulic conductivity of any part of the hydrogeologic system (C.C. Daniel,
III, U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 1985). However, flow probably
also occurs in the deeper fractured system in a manner harder to predict by
local surface topography. In the deeper system, regional topography or
structural features may result in flow over long distances and long ground-
water residence times in the fractured rock.
The ground-water flow system in the Piedmont is directly connected to
the surface-water system. The annual contribution of ground water to total
streamflow for 11 streams flowing through the Piedmont is estimated to
average 44 percent (Harned and Daniel, 1987). Consequently, it is a concern
that ground-water contamination will eventually discharge to streams that
are water-supply sources.
23
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Because of the interconnection of the ground-and surface-water systems
in the Piedmont, a drainage basin large enough to contain a perennial stream
can serve as a basic unit for the description of ground-water quality
(LeGrand, 1984). Each drainage basin is a flow-system cell similar to, and
yet separate from, surrounding basins. Although not all of the ground-water
flow for a particular area is confined within a single drainage basin, it
should be possible to generalize, with a reasonable degree of confidence,
about ground-water quality of larger regions from data collected in small
drainage basins. This is a basic assumption used in this study.
Hypotheses about the Piedmont ground-water flow system relevant to this
and future studies of the system include:
1. The transition zone between bedrock and regolith serves as a
primary transmitter of contaminated ground water. The regolith
serves as the principal reservoir of ground-water contamination.
2. Attenuation of ground-water contamination in the regolith is
related to the degree of weathering and composition of
regolith material and the hydraulic conductivity, gradient,
and porosity of the material.
3. The velocity of contaminant movement can be highest within
the fractured bedrock system, particularly under stressed
conditions.
4. The deeper zones in basement rock generally contain the best
quality water in the system due to contaminant attenuation
in the regolith.
5. Geomorphological analysis can be used to identify fracture
zones that help predict general subsurface-flow patterns of
ground-water contamination. These methods can be verified
with surface geophysical techniques.
Transition-Zone Studies
There have been some initial tests of the hypothesis that the
transition zone is a principal conduit of ground-water movemeat and ground-
water contamination. Daniel was the first· investigator to focus on the
transition zone and has done some initial test drilling, well construction,
and well logging to define its characteristics. In particular, temperature
logs run in several wells located in Cary and in Guilford County, North
24
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Carolina, may be used to identify greater movement of water within the
transition zone (Daniel and Sharpless, 1983).
Borehole geophysical log data were collected in June 1983 from five
bedrock wells (Gu-382, Gu-383, Gu-385, Gu-386, Gu-387) located at a test
site (fig. 8) in the Greensboro-High Point Regional Airport area by Daniel
and Sharpless (1983). Well depths ranged from 200 feet to 275 feet. The
borehole geophysical data from these five wells were collected in order to
refine current knowledge of subsurface geology and hydrologic parameters in
the test-site area. The data collected included natural gamma-ray logs,
porosity logs, temperature logs, teleview7r logs, and caliper logs.
Temperature logs also were collected at all five well sites in March 1985.
Well-log data collected at the test site agree with the results of
other well-log studies conducted in other sections of the Piedmont (Stewart,
1962). The bulk of the material in the upper 40 and 50 feet penetrated by
these wells is unconsolidated regolith. Here, total porosities are as high
as 60 percent and generally decrease significantly below this depth. The
gamma ray logs identified most clay-rich zones in the saprolite, as well as
zones of feldspars and micaceous minerals in bedrock. The temperature logs
were evaluated in order to (1) obtain geothermal-gradient profiles in the
bedrock wells, and (2) determine to what extent temperature profiles in an
open borehole might delineate zones of ground-water entrance or movement.
Nutter and Otten (1969) conducted a similar evaluation of temperature logs
collected from wells located in the Maryland Piedmont detecting seasonal
effects of temperature change on ground water in the first 60 feet _below
land surface.
The upper segments of temperature profile logs collected at well Gu-383
at the Greensboro-High Point test site in June 1983 and in March 1985 are
. shown in figure 12. Note the pronounced cool-water temperature bulge in
June 1983 from 21 to 52 feet.
Only a slight cool-water temperature deflections were detected on
temperature logs collected in March 1985 (fig. 12). Initial comparisons of
recorded surface-water temperature data collected in North Carolina for the
winter of 1982-83 (Gunter and others, 1984) and for the winter of 1984-85
indicate that the winter of 1982-83 may have been slightly cooler than the
winter of 1984-85. The temperature profile in figure 12 may suggest that
25
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rt
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
warmer water recharged the ground-water system in 1985 than in 1983 due to
slightly milder winter conditions. It is interesting to note that the
uppermost portions of the temperature curves (0 to 20 feet) have opposite
slopes. These near-surface temperature curves may reflect the actual
surface temperature conditions present when the logs were collected.
10
20
30
w
(J 40 < ~
C: ::,
V, 50
0 z <
J 60
;,:
0
J 70 w
Cl
f-w 80 w
~
;:; 90 -f-a_
w 100 0
11 0
120
130
58
June 1983
Wa1er level 17.3 1!, June 1983
eak SB.5°F
/ L-__ ..__ 3 5. 8 I I
Apparen1 Transition
Zone I 45.9 IL
of crng al I top of
Open hole
to
130 fl
59 60 61 62
March 198 5
1'1
f-Waler level "' . ~ 18.6 fl,
March 1985
~ .
f--
bedrock f-.
f-
f-,.
)-I
f-I
f-.
f-' -
f-.
63 64 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
TEMPERATURE, IN DEGREES FAHRENHEIT
Figure 12.--Temperature logs for well Gu-383, June 1983 and March 1985,
located at the Greensboro-High Point Regional Airport.
A more complete data base is needed in-the Piedmont province in order
to determine to what extent seasonal variations do affect ground-water
temperatures and if the subsurface temperatures can provide evidence of
greater flow in the transition zone than in the other zones.
POTENTIAL SOURCES OF GROUND-WATER CONTAMINATION
Assessment of potential sources of contamination is fundamental to the
management of the ground-water resource. As part of this assessment
26
ii
I
i ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
The Mecklenburg County studies will be coupled with other ongoing U.S.
Geological Survey studies in the Piedmont. A study of ground-water quality
in Guilford County, North Carolina, will provide information about
agricultural land uses. A study in Mecklenburg County relating land use to
surface-water quality will provide additional detailed land-use information,
as well as results relevant to the proposed ground-water study.
The data collected from the Mecklenburg and Guilford County studies
will be combined with the set of available ground-water quality data and
used to test for correlations between land use and ground-water quality.
The hypothesis that land use can be used to estimate regional ground-water
quality will be tested using non-parametric analysis of variance.
Comparison of results to other areas with known water-quality
characteristics will allow verification of the predictive models.
REFERENCES
Anderson, J.R., Hardy, E.E., Roach, J.T., and Witmer, R.E., 1976, A land
use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor
data:· U.S. Geologica1 Survey Professional Paper 964, 28 p.
Bain, G.L., 1966, Geology and ground-water resources of the Durham.area,
North Carolina: North Carolina Department of Water Resources Ground-
Water Bul.letin 7, 147 p.
Berry, E.L., 1970, Ground-water quality in Stanly County, North Carolina:
North Carolina Department of Water and Air Resources Ground-Water
Circular 15, 24 p.
Gressler, C.W., Thurmond, C.J., and Hester, W.G., 1983, Ground water in the
greater Atlanta region, Georgia: Georgia Department of Natural
Resources, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, .and The Georgia
Geologic Survey, in cooperation with U.S. Geological Survey,
Information Circular 63, 143 p.
Daniel, C.C., III, 1985, Statistical analysis of water-well records from
the Piedmont and Blue Ridge of North Carolina: Implications for well-
site selection and well design (abs.), Geological Society of America
Abstracts with P"ograms, v. 17, no. 2, p. 86-87.
___ 1987, Statistical analysis relating well yield to construction
practices and siting of wells in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge provinces
of North Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investi-
-ations Report 86-4132, 54 p.
51
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Daniel, C.C., III, and Sharpless, N.B., 1983, Ground-water supply potential
and procedures for well-site selection Upper Cape Fear River Basin,
Cape Fear River Basin Study 1981-83: North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources and Community Development and U.S. Water Resources
Council in cooperation with U.S. Geological Survey, 73 p.
Daniels, R.B., Kleiss, H.J., Baul, S.W., Byrd, H.J., and Phillips, J.A.,
1984, Soil systems in North· Carolina: North Carolina Agricultural
Research Service, North Carolina State University, Bulletin 467, 77 p.
Duncan, D.B., 1955, Multiple range and multiple F tests: Biometrics, v. 11,
p. 1-42.
Duncan, D.A., and Peace, R.R., Jr., 1966, Ground-water resources of
Cleveland County, North Carolina: North Carolina Department of Water
Rescurces Ground-Water Bulletin 11, 65 p.
Eddins, W.H., and Crawford, J.K., 1984, Reconnaissance of water-quality
characteristics of streams in the city of Charlotte and Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources
Investigations Report 84-4308, 105 p.
Eder, B.K., Davis, J.M., and Robinson, P.J., 1983, Variations in monthly
precipitation over North Carolina: North Carolina Climate Program
Office, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N. C., Report No.
185, 50 p.
Farrar, S.S., 1985, Tectonic evolution of the easternmost Piedmont, North
Carolina: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 96, p. 362-380.
Fenneman, N.M., 1938, Physiography of eastern United States: McGraw-Hill
Book Co., New York, p. 121-123.
Floyd, E.O., 1965, Geology and ground-water resources of the Monroe area,
North Carolina: North Carolina Department of Water Resources Ground-
Water Bulletin 5, 109 p.
Groves, M.R., 1976, Preliminary report on ground-water resources of Rowan
County, North Carolina: North Carolina Department of Natural and
Economic Resources Ground-Water Bulletin 22, 63 p.
Gunter, H.C., Hill, C.L., and Dillard, T.E., 1984, Water-resources data
North Carolina, water year 1983: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Data
Report NC-83-1, 534 p.
Harned, D.A., and Daniel, C.C., III, 1987, Ground-water component of
Piedmont streams in Implications for ground-water supply systems and
land-use planning: GSA Abstracts with Programs, v. 19, no. 2, February
1987.
52
l
I
I
I
I
I
ii
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
Heath, R.C., 1980, Basic elements of ground-water hydrology with reference
to conditions in North Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Water-
Resources Open-File Report 80-44, 856 p.
___ 1983, Basic ground-water hydrology: U.S. Geological Survey Water-
Supply Paper 2220, 84 p.
___ 1984, Ground-water regions of the United States: U.S. Geological
Survey Water-Supply Paper 2242, 78 p.
Heath, R.C., and Giese, G.L., 1980, What about ground water in western
North Carolina: are large supplies feasible?: U.S. Geological Survey
Pamphlet.
Helsel, D.R., and Ragone, S.E., 1984, A work plan for ground-water quality
appraisals of the toxic-waste ground-water contamination program: U.S.
Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4217, 33 p.
Hem, J.D., 1970, Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics
of natural water, 2nd ed: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper
1473, 363 p.
Kimberley, M.M., and Bellis, B.J., 1985, Neutron-activation analysis of
ground water around a chemical-waste landfill in the North Carolina
Piedmont: abs., 1985 Triangle Conference on Environmental Technology,
Raleigh, N.C.
LeGrand, H.E., 1954, Geology and ground water in the Statesville area, North
Carolina: North Carolina Department of Conservation and Development
Bulletin 68, 68 p.
___ 1958, Chemical character of water in the igneous and metamorphic rocks
of North Carolina: Economic Geology, v. 53, no. 12, p. 179-189.
___ 1967, Ground water of the Piedmont and Blue Ridge provinces in the
southeastern states: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 538, 11 p.
___ 1984, Ground water and its contamination in North Carolina with
reference to waste management: 92 p.
LeGrand, H.E., and Mundorff, M.J., 1952, Geology and ground water in the
Charlotte area, North Carolina: North Carolina Department of
Conservation and Development Bulletin 63, 88 p.
Lutz, J.F., 1969, The movement and storage of water in North Carolina soils
and the role of soil in determining water quality: Water.Resources
Research Institute of the University of North Carolina, no. 24, 45 p.
·May, V.J., and Thomas, J.D., 1968, Geology and ground-water resources in the
Raleigh area, North Carolina: North Carolina Department of Water and
Air Resources Ground-Water Bulletin 15, 135 p.
53
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t9
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
Mew, H.E., Jr., 1985, Ground water contamination and incident management in
North Carolina: North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and
Community Development, 17 p.
Mundorff, M._J., 1946, Ground water in the Halifax area, North Carolina:
North Carolina Department of Conservation and Development Bulletin 51,
76 p.
___ 1948, Ground water in the Greensboro area, North Carolina: North
Carolina Department of Conservation and Development Bulletin 55, 108 p.
Nacht, S.J., 1983, Monitoring sampling protocol considerations: Ground
Water Monitoring Review, v. 3, no. 3, p. 23-29.
North Carolina Department of Human Resources, Division of Health Services,
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch, 1984, North Carolina 1983
annual report of hazardous waste generated, stored, treated, or
disposed: North Carolina Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Annual Report, 157 p.
Nutter, L.J., and Otton, E.G., 1969, Ground-water occurrence in the
Maryland Piedmont: Maryland Geological Survey Report of Investigations
no. 10, 56 p.
Peace, R.R., Jr., and Link, D.R., 1971, Geology and ground-water resources
of northwestern North Carolina: North Carolina Department of Water and
Air Resources Ground-Water Bulletin 19, 135 p.
Pusey, R.D., 1960, Geology and ground water in the Goldsboro area, North
Carolina: North Carolina Department of Water Resources Ground-Water
Bulletin 2, 72 p.
Ragland, P.C., Hatcher, R.D., Jr., and Whittington, D., 1983, Juxtaposed
Mesozoic diabase dike sets from the Carolinas, a preliminary
assessment: Geology, v. 11, p. 394-399.
Richardson, C.A., 1982, Ground water in the Piedmont upland of central
Maryland: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2077, 42 p.
Russell, G.S., Russell, G.W., and Farrar, S.S., 1985, Alleghanian
deformation and metamorphism in the eastern North Carolina Piedmont:
Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 96, p. 381-387.
Schipf, R.G., 1961, Geology and ground-water -resources of the Fayetteville
area: North Carolina Department of Water Resources Ground-Water
Bulletin 3, 99 p.
Simmons, C.E., and Heath, R.C., 1979, Water-quality characteristics of
forested and rural basins in North Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey
Water-Supply Paper 2185-B, 33 p .
54
,
' .i \ 2
j 'i
:i
l ,
1
<
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I --
Sokal, R.R.; and Rohlf, F.J., 1969, Biometry:
776 p .
Stewart, J.W., 1962, Water-yielding potential
rocks at the Georgia Nuclear Laboratory:
Professional Paper 450-B, 2 p.
San Francisco, W.H. Freeman,
of weathered crystalline
U.S. Geological Survey
Sumsion, C.T., and Laney, R.L., 1967, Geology and ground-water resources of
the Morganton area: North Carolina Department of Water Resources
Ground-Water Bulletin 12, 119 p.
Thornbury, W.D., 1954, Principals of geomorphology: New York, John Wiley
and Sons, Inc., p. 135.
U.S. Soil Conservation Service, 1978, General soils map of North Carolina
by Watershed: Raleigh, N.C., Soil Conservation Service and the North
Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development,
9 sheets.
Wehr, F., and Grover, L., III, 1985, Stratigraphy and tectonics of the
Virginia-North Carolina Blue Ridge evolution of a late Proterozoic-
early Paleozoic hinge line: Geological Society of America Bulletin,
V. 96, p. 285-295.
55
I
I
I
I
I _.
I
I
I
I
I
I
'~
I
Memorandum
Date: July 17, 1998
To: File
From:
Subj.:
Douglas Moore
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Water System
Johnson Controls -Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, N.C.
US EPA ID: NCO 000 770 487
On Thursday, July 16, 1998, I spoke with Mr. Bob Huff, Assistant Superintendent -Utilities
Department [phone], about the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County municipal system. Mr. Huff
indicated that the system serves the city of Winston-Salem, the towns of Clemmons, Kernersville
and Rural Hall, and parts of rural Forsyth County. There are a total of92,732 connections to the
system, which multiplied by 2.4 persons per household (1990 US Census for Forsyth County) equals
222,557 people served by the system. Mr. Huff estimated that the Salem Lake intake provides about
30 % of the water for the entire system. Thus, the total population apportioned to the Salem Lake
intake would equal 222,557 x 0.3, or 66,767 people.
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
Memorandum
Date: July 15, I 998
To: File
From: Douglas Moore ~ f.:jj.A_,___
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
Subj.: Walkertown Water System
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, NC
US EPA ID: NCO 000 770 487
On Wednesday, July 15, 1998, I spoke with Mrs. Lynn McKinnie with the Town of
Walkertown regarding water use [phone]. Mrs. McKinnie stated that the Town of
Walkertown operates four drinking water wells that serve a total of3,761 residents. The wells are
deep wells (175 feet or deeper) and located as follows: (I) Intersection of Friendly and Harley Road .
(2) Dillon Road. (3) Intersection of Leight andSalem Road. (4) On Pinehall Road near the
intersection of U.S. 321. The Town of Walkertown is connected to the Winston-Salem/Forsyth
County Water System as a backup.
--r - - - - - --. --l!!!!!!!!!!I l!!!!I -== == r -
I
Reference 21
GREENHORNE & O'MARA, INC. ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
SURVEYORS • PHOTOGRAMMETRISTS
1 _ BY __ _LQ::S4.. DATE -~/.-ff5'-)5_ 1 SU~JECT -----~~~fi',-CD_--.U::(ccl(,(JS--.,-----·--:--·, SHE_ET NO. -----i--OF ---";2---
.. f\ :-. 0 · c, c:_ _ DATE ,]_~t~1t-'f2 --G,lClhl-----&_,~~--~--'•<H.Q1~--------JOB NO. ----------------------------
REV BY ----------DATE -----------_w_,D_~J-f>'"--Sc.J...'-e'tri+J:lfS" jti-i--_G;, __ --___ FILE NO. ----------------------------1 Wah-< -V I s ---: ------ -------
s. ff '--1 '----------------
1 '\ '
W;(\s'~(\-3,_,_L<:,{y\/F~¾v.-. Cc,~~¼ J'DLlni~p9J Wc.:kr ~:e·el~
. . . .. -' . ,.. -·-... I '7Y I s-oo Q.D(\nech.~,~s-X ~-LG-fu~:-~J _ I 7l ,_ ?oci.
I
~,JD e.c:. Ci.D bO.,t.tc-Uf ":tel _ W c,___I 'c___~ -h:, L.0 n I ) .:;l ~, 0
ISO 1 0:10
I L./0 °/0 o/ wcd--er: Ccmes f:-()01 Q.., ~urfo.c..u .,___,_,c;._!-c.r._ 1n f c...t,e.. Qn 0u.lem l..c-J:.v . . _
I ,,'" ')JI O~<;,' p-e..~\.s., G-p-poc-ho(\eJ -+o_ ,$cJC'..m ~-in~
1 l1\atce c-bwo · I.JAtec ::,-:J--w·
••.. \ 1J1D \~-\~ -1~=~1-~ ::~:cc.~ :f~f-~ -~~-~'.:~_,_:P~:-~~~: : _:::·: __ --.
DC...Q±e_d 6-e:-h,,,ie..en ,3 D..00 t{ mi'les ;_ - ' ------
_ .. 1-•---. . . fc6ro: __ --fue.. __ ::~:t:i _::: ____ :: __ :: ___ : _:::: :::: ____ : __ ::::::_::: ___ : ____ :_: __ --------------:: __ :: ____ :: __ : __ : _____ _
I. _Pc,;·,c:ie li)el\s :·_:-_:::::::··;:_ ::.:::: ·::::_· :·_:: .. ---_·::: -··: -
·_: :-t{C;,-c\: l; ~~---··31:·of ·T~c;;;,s--:: :r;,,;:;~·;s:I&o;s~ -h-~-id"': .. 3'<t~\ i~;:6~~~f l?~i·;1~hoC
I ·:j_:~11~: ;;_1i ·· · -· : :::-:6:: : ·: ... : ::_: :::_: :::~~:J:~LM._ ··::~.:.::L;~::::_.-:: :: : : ::: · ~::o::o_::::·:::::::: . __ _
I ':i:?~ko ~ 0;1: IL:·: ' --'·:·:::c;c., ::: ::: : :.:::: ::_:::.x:~~;~j,c: •c:.f:,~:;:~: :: : .. :: :.:. :: ,:J~:·::: ~~r::::::~:::.·
1:-_ . .. -.. -----_: __ . ~------. __ : ---. --::: ::: :: : : : :_: :::_':::; ::: '.. : : :::'.: -~ ::: :::~::::::-: ::: :~::.;~: .
I
r 1
'
a GREENHORNE & O'MARA, INC, ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS
SURVEYORS • PHOTOGRAMMETRISTS
I
1Rc,01·ils
1/u, · {Y11 \e..
1/.J.rn,\c
11-(Y\1\e,
19 -n,, \e.,
3 -'"' \'(,
1•m1\~
I
SHEET NO. _,j______ OF d ....
JOB NO. ---------------------------·
FILE NO. ----------------------------
-Sc.lem) i-()1:_;,c.i ti,, c..c.,, iTl<J,,' ( I pc-l_ CUcJ-v s,,(S:~
Cco+si CJe.. c__1 tcJJ / .
-=ll=Gt ttQV:.,\"..S, Pu-;s,cr,s I l-\--c2~cld ~o±cJ Rc,cLcJ pq?~biloo
;):S
/JG
IL,$;
'7f7
,7/) 2:,0
3) )/_p'6
I
c). "I
r;;;J' '-I
c]. '-1
;]. y
(~ '-/
,,J, '1.
60
'1 ?
103
I 'if!9 I
·S135J.
');fl(j 3, .:: :·:::: :::: ..
. . { LJ '-1,\,, , (\ . c_, -h. ) . . . . • . . . ·: .. : . . -
Q ·· ..... oc.o' L) s
. .. . . -... --. . . .. ... -.... -.. -...... --.. --.. __ () __ ............ -.. -.. .. . .... ------. .. -. -.. -.. ------r--------_; ______ .. A:ce,c'----= m ~ .. 0Gos 1 --k6 To \-cJ.. Re, cl:G..L Popu G<.-ll w ... I '-i-rn,k. ' Cf)' ..... :), D_J 3, .. o-21 0 0 3 .. --------------.
-~._JoJr Q; hu\Q .: M•;;o 1' C ,\ ?c~R :. \;i at&; '3-2±~M,. _-. : : :.~ :::::~::::.::t::::::::::: . _: \
Be~,,):;, ~ct l:k-L%c.s • ... El'cws (i-+rn»<~boid 1,..:±c::C 8f,d·,~2recrTBh<n. ':
,; ; ··-·-·· .. ... .... .... ..... . .. ·--... , ---...... --·---------·------·----··---------.. ! ..... '.?i.·.fY\).\€....... . .... 3\ ..... __ __ ... _;. :o>'.L/: ................ : ......... 1 .. 'i.:. ... ~.J ___ ·, ___ \ __ .: .. .
' ! ' . --· ' ····-··-··-·--·;·___ .. ··~·· --~ ~ ·-· ~ ' .,,,,,--·.--·--,------·--··----.----.--.·.-.. ·.•;,_·.-_"'·.--.~... . . .., ,, ......... "F-uo"" ---.----,--·.--------. . . ,:,' i.,. "'. ... /Y\, .ie... .. ..... ..... O' oLv .. _ . __ ---,-......... _____ --.°'' . ,.... .· jij:fiil::~ ;::t: i:&::cI·:~:-... .
l-i,foT·4,c··· Pop u 1c,c1, o;,.·.·• •·•:·.:: ···•·· ·• .. ·• . ····••·•···· : : :•••• ::· ••··• ~.•····-:c0iosfur::~:s;J~~·:+:·:1,sc..\fei~n ;.e.1;~itG:w~ns:::~::Jj:·
1:31:1: : . . , . : . . , . . . I : , ' I . 1---·-----'-____ ,. -------:::::·.::.·:·::::::·:::··----.~ a~.~--~a.:~:_ · 90 c __
...... · 1.9.1,-?F.3 ~-. I
I ..
I
I
••
I
I
I
.. _..
I
I
I . '
I ·.· ,: .. · ;. ,:;:. ~
I
I
I \,.
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
" I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
.0101
.0102
.0103
.0104
.0105
.0106
.0107
.0108
.0109
.0110
.0111
.0112
.0113
.0114
SUBCHAPTER2L
GROUNDWATER CLASSIFICATION AND STANDARDS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION: .0100 · GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
AUTHORIZATION ............................................................ pg. 1
DEFINITIONS.................................................................. 1
POLICY........................................................................... 3
RESTRlCTED DESIGNATION (RS).......................................... 4
ADOPTION BY REFERENCE................................................ 5
CORRECTIVE ACTION...................................................... 5
COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY................................................ 10
REVIEWBOUNDARY...................................... ................... 12
DELEGATION.................................................................. 12
MONITORING.................................................................. 13
REPORTS........................................................................ 13
ANALYTICALPROCEDURES................................................ 14
VARIANCE..................................................................... 14
NOTIFICATIONREQUIREMENTS.......................................... 16
SECTION: .0200 · CLASSIFICATIONS AND GROUNDWATER OUALTTY STANDARDS
.0201
.0202
GROUNDWATER CLASSIFICATIONS.................................... 19
Class GA groundwaters; usage and occurrence.............................. I 9
Class GSA groundwaters; usage and occurrence........................... 19
Class GC groundwaters; usage and occurrence.............................. 19
GROUNDWATER QUALITY STANDARDS.............................. 19
ClassGAStandards ........... ~ ................................................ 20
Class GSA Standards......................................................... 20
ClassGCWaters..... ... . . . .. . ... .. . .. ... . .. . . . . ... .. . ... .. . . . . ... .. . ... . . . .. . . 22
SECTION: .0300 · ASSIGNMENT OF UNDERGROUND WATER CLASSIFICATIONS
.0301 CLASSIFICATIONS:GENERAL............................................. 25
.0302 STATEWIDE.................................................................. 25
.0303 BROAD RIVER BASIN...................................................... 25
.0304 CAPEFEARRIVERBASIN. ... . .. . ... ......... ... ... .. . ... .. . . . . .. ... . . . ... .. 25
.0305 CATAWBARIVERBASIN .......... :........................................ 26
.0306 CHOW AN RIVER BASIN...................................................... 26
.0307 FRENCHBROADRlVERBASIN............................................. 26
.0308 HTW ASS EE RIVER BASIN................................................... 26
.0309 LITTI.,ETENNESSEERIVERBASIN....................................... 26
.0310 SANNAH RIVER BASIN................................................... 26
.0311 LUMBERRIVERBASIN...................................................... 26
.0312 NEUSERIVERBASIN......................................... ................ 27
.0313 NEW-WATAUGA RIVER BASIN.......................................... 27
.0314 PASQUOTANK RIVER BASIN............................................. 27
.0315 ROANOKE RIVER BASIN................................................... 27
.0316 TAR PAMLICO RlVER BASIN............................................. 27
-·-.(i3.J7 WHITEOAKRIVERBASIN.... ... . .. . ... .. ... . . . . ... .. . .. . .. . .. . . . . .. ... . .. . . 27
.0318 YADKIN-PEE DEE RIVER BASIN.......................................... 27
.0319 . RECLASSIFICATION...................................................... 28
-• i
~
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
EHNR -ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TISA: 02L .0200
to the previous review.
(g) Class GA Standards. Where not otherwise indicated, the standard refers to the total concentration in milligrams per liter of any constituent in a dissolved, colloidal or particulate form which is mobile in groundwater. This does not apply to sediment or other particulate matter which is preserved in a groundwater sample as a result of well construction or sampling procedures.
(I) acetone: 0. 7
(2) acrylamide (propenamide): 0.00001
(3) arsenic: 0.05
(4) barium: 2.0
(5) benzene: 0.00 I
f(6Jm'!Q'Ql:9_1_!:W}3~J
(7) bromoform (tribromomethane): 0.00019
(§)wiifb'iitylb}:rfi:'"iifp!it.!)].!_a.Q!f~.Qzl,Q}
(9) cadmium: 0.005
(10) carbofuran: 0.036
(11) carbon tetrachloride: 0.0003
(12) chlordane: 2. 7 x 10 · 5
(13) chloride: 250.0
(14) chlorobenzene:. 0.05.
(15) chloroform (trichloromethane): 0.00019
(16) 2-chlorophenol: 0.0001
(17) chromium: 0.05
(18) cis-1,2-dichloroethene: 0.07
(19) coliform o:ganisms (total): 1 per 100 milliliters (20) color: 15 color units
(21) copper: LO
(22) cyanide: 0.154
(23) 2, 4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid): 0.07 (24) 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane: 2.5 x 10 · 5) (25) dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon-12; Halon): 1.4 (26) 1, 1 dichloroethane: 0. 7
(27) 1,2-dichloroethane (ethylene dichloride): 0.00038 (28) 1, 1-dichloroethy!ene (vinylidene chloride): 0.007 (29) 1,2-dichloropropane: 0.00056
(30) di-n-butyl (or dibutyl) phthalate (DBP): 0.7 (31) diethy!phthalate (DEP): 5.0
(32) di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP): 0.003 (~3)ig,wr,dl;-il~b-ctylfpntlfalate:l0JJ:i1'
(34) p-dioxane (1,4-diethylene dioxide): 0.007 (35) dioxin: 2.2 x 10· IO
(36) dissolved solids (total): 500
ITTFN,"tit1iifrid~~1$1:itti'aiate'1r(s~nticizer 111 ): 0.14 (38) endrin: 0.002
(39) epichlorohydrin {l-chloro-2,3-epoxypropane): 0.00354 (40) ethylbenzene: 0.029
(41) ethylene dibromide (EDB; 1,2-dibromoethane): 4.0 x 10 · 7 (42) ethylene glycol: 7.0
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 10/2S/94 -PAGE21
g ..
n
D
D
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
EHNR -ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT T15A: 02L .0200
(43jZsl:'tliiorene::o.'28'
-(44) fluoride: 2.0
(45) foaming agents: 0.5
(46) gross alpha (adjusted)particle activity (excluding radium-226 and uranium): 15
pCi/1
(47) heptachlor: 8.0 x 10·6
(48) heptachlor epoxide: 4.0 x 10·6
(49) heptane: 2.1
(50) hexachlorobenzene (perchlorobenzene): 0.00002
(51) n-hexane: 0.42
(52) iron: 0.3
(53) lead: 0.015
(54) lindane: 2.0 x 10 ·4
(55) manganese: 0.05
(56) mercury: 0.0011
(57) metadichlorobenzene (1,3-dichlorobenzene): 0.62
(58) methoxychlor: 0.035
(59) methylene chloride (dichloromethane): 0.005
(60) methyl ethyl ketone (MEK; 2-butanone): 0.17
(61) methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE): 0.2
1(62)]['1fil.rlaJihtha!g°rft:'f6i()if!
(63) nickel: 0.1
(64) nitrate: (as N) I 0.0
(65) nitrite: (as N) 1.0
(66) orthodichlorobenzene (1,2-dichlorobenzene): 0.62
(67) oxamyl: 0.175
(68) paradichlorobenzene (1,4-dichlorobenzene): 0.075
(69) pentachlorophenol: 0.0003
(70) pH: 6.5 -8.5
i_@!:).ii&.ii;hena!lth"¥e'iib?~O!W
(/i,2-JffiglJ(l!~;OJ
(73) radium-226 and radium-228 (combined): 5 pCi/1
(74) selenium: 0.05
(75) silver: 0.018
(76) styrene (ethenylbenzene): 0.1
(77) sulfate: 250.0
(78) tetrachloroethylene (perch!oroethylene; PCE): 0.0007
(79) toluene (methylbenzene): 1.0
(80) toxaphene: 3.1 x 10-5
(81) 2, 4, 5,-TP (Silvex): 0.05
(82) trans-1,2-dichloroethene: 0.07
(83) I, I ,I-trichloroethane (methyl chloroform): 0.2
(84) trichloroethylene (TCE): 0.0028
(85) trichlorofluoromethane: 2. I
(86) vinyl chloride (chloroethylene): 1.5 x 10·5
(87) xylenes (o-, m-, and p-): 0.53
(88) zinc: 2.1
(h) Class GSA Standards. The standards for this class shall be the same as those for
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 10/25/94
~ I! ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rt
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
EHNR -ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TISA: 02L .0200
Class GA except as follows:
(I) chloride: allowable increase not to exceed 100 percent of the natural quality concentration.
(2) total dissolved solids: 1000 mg/I.
(i) Class GC Waters.
(I) The concentrations of substances which, at the time of classification exceed the standards applicable to Class GA or GSA groundwaters shall not be caused to increase, nor shall the concentrations of other substances be caused to exceed the GA or GSA standards as a result of further disposal of contaminants to or beneath the surface of the land within the boundary of the area classified GC. (2) The concentrations of substances which, at the time of classification, exceed the standards applicable to GA or GSA groundwaters shall not be caused to migrate as a result of activities within the boundary of the GC classification, so as to violate the groundwater or surface water quality standards in adjoining waters of a different class.
(3) Concentrations of specific substances, which exceed the established standard at the time of classification, shall be listed in Section .0300 of this Subchapter.
History Note: Statutory Authority G.S. 143-214.J; 143B-282(a)(2);
Eff. June 10, 1979;
Amended Eff. November I, I 994; October I, I 993; September I, I 992; August 1, 1989.
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 10/25/94 PAGE 23
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
February 5, 1998
Mr. Henry Moore
2635.West Mountain Road
Kernersville, NC 27284
Subj.: Well Sampling Results
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division,
Kernersville, Forsyth County, NC
USEPA ID# NCD000770487
Dear Mr. Moore:
As you are aware, the NC Superfund Section collected samples from your drinking water well on August 13, 1997 as part of an environmental assessment of the site. Samples were analyzed by laboratories participating in the EP A's contract laboratory program for the chemicals listed on the attached sheets. The contaminants listed below were detected in your well water sample. Concentrations are listed in parts per billion (PPB).
Concentration
Contaminant (PPB)
Barium 31.0
Copper 490.0
Lead 11.0
Zinc 100.0
Calcium 2,300.0
Magnesium 1,300.0
Potassium 890.0
EPA action level
NC Groundwater
Standard (PPB)
2,000.0
1,000.0
15.0
2,100.0
none issued
none issued
none issued
*
** EPA Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels
MCL (PPB)
2,000.0
I ,300.0*
15.0*
5,000.0**
none issued
none issued
none issued
These contaminants were measured at concentrations which are below applicable NC Groundwater Standards and below Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) considered acceptable for public water supplies. These results were reviewed by the State Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section and they have concluded that your water is safe for continued normal usage. A copy of their evaluation is attached for your information.
If you have any questions regarding health concerns, please contact Dr. Ken Rudo, Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section at [phone].
401 ODER LIN ROAD, SUITE 1 SO, RA.LEIGH, NC 27605
PHONE 919•733-4996 FAX [phone] AN EQUAL Op~ORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -50% RECYCLED/1 O;o/c. POST•CONSUMER PAPER
I
.. ,,,· .
I. JAMES B. HUNT JR·.•
• GoVERNOR
::, .. ··. ·/·· '... .
• NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Letter to Mr. Moore
February 5, 1998
Page 2
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
If you have any other questions, please contact Douglas Moore, Superfund Section
at (9 I 9) 733-280 I, ext. 3 I 5.
attachments
cc: Dr. Ken Rudo, letter only
File
Donna Keith
Douglas Moore
~":j --j/ ~\ tr-
Pat DeRosa, Head
Site Evaluation and Removal Branch
Superfund Section
401 OBERLIN ROAD, SUITE 150, RALEIGH, NC 2.7605
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER -SO% RECYCLED/I 0% P0ST•C0NSUM ER PAPER
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
February 5, 1998
Mr. Otis Crews
2771 West Mountain Road
Kernersville, NC 27284
Subj.: Well Sampling Results
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division,
Kernersville, Forsyth County, NC
USEPA ID# NCD000770487
Dear Mr. Crews:
As you are aware, the NC Superfund Section collected samples from your drinking water well on August I 3, 1997 as jlart of an environmental assessment of the site. Samples were analyzed by laboratories participating in the EPA's contract laboratory program for the chemicals listed on the attached sheets. The contaminants listed below were detected in your well water sample. Concentrations are listed in parts per billion (PPB).
Concentration NC Groundwater Contaminant (PPB) Standard (PPB) MCL (PPB) Barium 8.0 2,000.0 2,000.0 Zinc 26.0 2,100.0 5,000.0** Calcium 11,000.0 none issued none issued Magnesium 4,700.0 none issued none issued Potassium 1,300.0 none issued none issued
** EPA Secondary Maximum Contaminant Levels
These contaminants were measured at concentrations which are below applicable NC Groundwater Standards and below Maximum 1Contaminant Levels (MCLs) considered acceptable for 12..ublic water supplies. These results were reviewed by the State Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section and they have concluded that your water is safe for continued normal usage. A copy of their evaluation is attached for your information.
If you have any questions regarding health concerns, please contact Dr. Ken Rudo, Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Section at [phone].
401 OBERLIN ROAD, SUITE 150, RALEIGH, NC 27605 PHONE 919-733•4996 FAX 919•7 I 5-3605 AN EQUAL OPPORTUN ITV /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER • S0% RECYCLED/I 0% POST·CONSUMl:R PAPER
• • NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Letter to Mr. Crews
February 5, l 998
Page 2
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
If you have any other questions, please contact Douglas Moore, Superfund Section
at [phone], ext.315.
attachments.
cc: Dr. Ken Rudo, letter only
File
Donna Keith
Douglas Moore
(
i
Sincerely,
/
Pat DeRosa, Head
Site Evaluation and Removal Branch
Superfund Section
401 OBERLIN ROAD, SUITE 1 SO, RALEIGH, NC 27605
PHONE 9 I 9•733-4996 FAX 919•715•3605
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/ AFFIRMATIVE ACTJ0N EM PLOVER · 50% RECYCL.E0/1 0% P0ST·C0NSU MER PAPER
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I _.
I
I
I
I
Action ID:
)
. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Wilmington District
199700928,
Notification of Jurisdictional Dete'rmination -. ',-;,. -, . -,-: . JUL 1 o 1997
Property owner/ Authorized Agent: North Carolina Superfund Section c/o D~~~~~W!ID SECTION
Address: 401 Oberlin Road, Suite 150, Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Telephone Number: [phone] ext. 315
Size and Location.of Property (waterbody, Highway name/number, town, etc.): Superfund site
near the Johnson.Controls facility located off of West Mountain Stree.t, adjacert to Lowery Mill
Creek, near Winston~Sal_e!ll, in Forsyth County,_North Carolina.! 'C1 :, l ,, ,, ',I
Indicate.Which of the following apply: · ,,·
X * There are wetlands on the above described property which we strnngly suggest should be
delineated and surveyed. The surveyed wetland lines must be verified by our staff before
the Corps will make a final jurisdictional detem1ination on your property. Concur with
the identification ofi11risdictio11a/ sites as 011tli11ed bv your provided map dated J1111e 4. 1997.
* Because of the size of your property and our present worklo:id, our identification and
delineation of your wetlands cannot be accomplished in a timely manner. You may wish
to employ a consultant to obtain a more timely delineation of the wetlands. · Once your
consultant has flagged a wetland line on the property, Corps staff will review it, and, if it
is accurate, we strongly recommend that you.have the line surveyed for final approval by
the Corps. The Corps will not make a final jurisdictional determination on your property
with out an approved survey.
* The wetlands on your lot have been delineated, and the limits of Corps jurisdiction have
been explained to you. Unless there is a change in the law or our publi_shed regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed three years from the date
of this notification.
* There are no wetlands present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there
is a change in the.law or our published regulations, this determination may be· relied upon
for a period not to exc·eed three years from the date of this notification.
* The project is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties. You should contact the nearest
State Office of Coastal Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material in wetlands on this property wiihout a Department of the
Army permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311 ).
A permit is not required for work on the.,froperty restricted entirely to existing high ground. If
you have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact
John T. Thomas, Jr. • / . / a)t [phone], Extension 25
Project Manager Signature: /'cA ), )_./:;___
Date: 7 July 1997 ' Expiration Date: 7 July 2002
SURVEY PLAT OR FIELD SKETCH OF DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THE
WETLAND DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE YELLOW (FILE)
COPY OF THIS FORM.
I
lt
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
(
I
Memorandum
Date: June 4, 1997
To:
From:
File
Douglas Moore
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
Subj.: Wetland Delineation
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
US EPA ID: NCD 000 770 487
On Tuesday, June 3, .1997, Doug Moore and Stuart Parker of the NC Superfund Section
travelled to the subject site to conduct an offsite reconnaissance of two drainages that connect the
site to Lowery Creek. We arrived at the entrance to the site at 11 :00 where we met with Mr. John
Thomas, wetlands specialist with the Army Corps of Engineers, Chris Fisher, process engineer with
Johnson Controls, and Debbie Hastings, environmental engi:1eer with the Milwaukee Office of
Johnson Controls. After briefing everyone about the purpose of the trip, we drove to the residence
of Otis Crews, a neighbor who owns the adjacent property where the two drainage features are
located. Fllowing a brief explanation of the purpose of the trip to Mr. Crews, he grated us
permission to conduct our wetland delineation on his property.
From 11 :30-12: 15, Doug Moore, Stuart Parker, John Thomas, Chris Fisher and Debbie
Hastings tra~ed the drainage from pond #1 downstream to a power line near the confluence with
Lowery Creek. At a point roughly 150-200 feet downstream of pond# I, the_ unnamed tributary
converges with runoff from the railroad tracks and properties to the north and east of the pond along
West Mountain Road. About 800-900 feet downstream of pond #1, we observed one seep
discharging groundwater to the north bank of the unnamed tributary. There were several small
wetland areas extending for short distanc(!s along the north and south bank of the-unnamed tributary,
which were too small in size to meet the minimum size restrcitions for a EPA jurisdictional wetland.
At 12:15, Mr. John Thom2s identified the first EPA jurisdictional wetland located on an
unnan1ed tributary that connects pond #1 of the Johnson Controls site to Lowery Creek. The wetland
begins approximately I 00 feet upstream of a power line crossing, and roughly 1500 feet downstream
of pond#!. The wetland appears to be continuous and contiguous along both sides of the tributary
and extends downstream from this point for about 500 feet to the confluenc~ with Lowery Creek.
This wetland contains the dominant plant species of alder, river birch and sweet gum. The wetland
hydrology was created by an artificial boundary between a slightly meandering, channelized stream
to a broadened, triangularly-shaped, alluvial deposit, similar to a delta, that was apparently created
by a recession in flow due to the water elevation in Salem Lake. The primary wetland indicators of
saturated soils within the upper l 2 inches, sediment deposits and drainage p'attems within the
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
wetlands. The soil exhibited a low chroma 1 0YR 4/1 hydric soil color. Mr. Thomas indicated that
this wetland would be classified as a palustrine scrub-shrub type.
From 12;20-12:50, we traced the drainage of the second unnamed tribtuary beginning at the
discharge below pond #3 and extending downstream to the power line crossing near the confluence
with Lowery Creek.
At 12:50, Mr. Thomas identified a seccmd wetland located on an second unnan1ed tributary that
connects ponds #2 and #3 of the Johnson Controls site to Lowery Creek. The wetland begins
approximately 200 feet upstream of a power line crossirig, roughly 900 feet downstream of pond #3.
The wetland appears to be continuous and contiguous along both sides of the tributary, extending
downstream from this point for about 500 feet to the confluence with Lowery Creek. This wetland
contains fue dominant plant species of red maple, green ash, sweet gum and downy dogwood, with
poison ivy and sensitive fern. The wetland hydrology was also created by an artificial boundary
between a slightly meandering, channelized stream to a broadened, triangularly-shaped, alluvial
deposit, similar to a delta, that was apparently created by a recession in flow due to the water
elevation in Salem Lake. The primary wetland indicators were saturated soils within 12 inches,
sediment deposits, drainage patterns within the wetlands and secondary indicators of oxidized
rhizospheres in the upper 12 inches. The soil exhibited a low chroma l0YR 4/1 hydric soil color.
Mr. Thomas indicated this would also be classified as a palustrine scrub-shrub type.
At 13:30, Doug Moore and Stuart Parker departed the site for Raleigh .
'
CONTENTS
PAGE NO. REFERENCE DATE
c,rl'i1~ -~ '7~ I -I ,,, 9CJ ...... -W-•,
--n. I ' ~-1 <;,: • . r._._ 1.~\ ',~li'C•
~,o '£t,~ ,, I,. ,p,,i • . . r' I t -fd 01---·
.. ,.,~+rk... 4 f • , : I . ,. 'o, .
L
-
·-·-
-
-
P"'...---:-1 _--,-,l~I-~,------:-:-_:--___ :--· --------
] \,.,,,.woL., ... -.·· J•_ ; . .,-:·1.. -·-.i..
./ I I : I
. I
··---~'>:
.. ;~~~~,;~~--'
i . i.
i .
I
>--
~{(d.J
, __ .H. .
tn , ...... A4
,, ;,, l-I,-,
~" l,J.., "
~ ... ~
f. . .I>. " (
la .....,; '" '
fl ,_
I .
l... 17 ~
J
r... I...
,;µ 'fr.,
n,H i~f
(>II I . I
I...., ~,. ..
' 4 ~ ,_
_r,1-~w "'
.. ' .--~! _<~:'., ~. ~-,r ,_. i l ' ' .·i ' I ! • . . I _ __j
1 j .. _.r\ .. i t·. I
' I l :+• L ~ : . .
! 1· .:L .i i '• •.. . . ' '
'= , ;:.Ji·· -r-/,'. ·. d )~ ,:l ... .. "' 4 di , ·-·
~I· I lu • ' i· -~ui/ c-x,.~~-_!i~ b I .·r i ;/4 --;:r u ;~od: .1--z:~: :£ ~ c.
1,,.,J.A,c. ,,~-1, -.i Jo,;.-iL
... o•dl ,_ W~..... J_..., ~ L .
"' .. it --, . I r ..... e1;. J •• <J. ,.,., I .,
a bk .. bi.J;t/l.<.· -tJ.,4k
.... u ... ,.. .JJ. l. l< l,1..E,... . .
!
{i, ...... d fJ-u l--fit.J.i. I >1 -b..__
I J I I ' I I I. I I )e,-., ~,~ ---~.:, I .. L,.1~ [0,'. L,,,,L J, _I . ,,_h
J -ro~ , ,.,J I I 1-(... .-l r. cp.,., LA
,:U El ~ I Yf,._), ! JJ, /J 7 .'-..« !
I I ! i
....... i 4 e.. );; 1,· ,,,/ I....;-""1
..f ..,,1, [. I • I • i ,... •.v ~s;>•'7'
d~k-i
.... ~;..J :I -..-j:...,.
·i I -I '
J.. ,, ,I • I I C..,. I
I i i ' P1'1::-r
<c {-tr'll
_/'
I I
I ;
' f ~ C ~JI @ M' ~ -7 f"? OJ ' -. • fl .
P.
i
,..-o-~
·"'-''1d o'ZJYIA r C !Y
-= '
I t vh / l~ , i-f"'l -r'1t 71" a] -id
I I -'_.,._ • • I ...
i I I -·----------' . ; '.'S1V? -,. ._,g;_
........ --··-------y f"'~ "?t: I . -I" 7-Mf, ,..
' I I
;· ..
I . ~--.:.~;-t,-ik--:. -! 'cl ' ' I ' ...
I I·' '. I , :...J___, T
I .. , · r : . · r-r5'4. ""u1 l ' ·' ~ '. . ' ... ~. ,'i '
I ":" "i ~ P"' 5 'i4" . -.v E1 · '>f1 '1l Ml I . I I ,
I ~-""'l/"f'-n, · t"" )P'' 1 'f»Jr-,-
I l -I' .. ' I i ~ .L--
! --z.. f"r.lJ ':tr' :M' ffl'1r"~ -· s'·tr
. " "t. · • rtf+. -i'ilt -~ .,. 11 ""7 t ..,...
I. ' I
I ·'-'~t'ff''·: ""''1 ' .
.. I ~:f-
i 11(.:-t;,' 3' '! ~ G11
' /I 'T ,a.::·
. ' '
.• l '-j<"
~ =r~ry-.a ;if~ ~...:::~.'Yj'"' r 1 ""'~-
i Jcr fl-,..~ r~?Ft~ -~
I ; -i fi'I fl4r,prh t,._,i.,,...J.,J r~ !
· 1
•, I , ~~ -JI"' n t~ I\,; I. . .. , ·j. ·-r. --'f", -. I· . '-
i •.
-i I
. . :·1--,. ~
·:
' -.1 ·I '
: ' .. 'i ·. :··· ....
I •
-
·.
/:_:.,:_.
'-~•''-·'~:;~-1::fi>~-.
'-' ;rl .~1 " :: ;i:: -----i--1 It
t--j-'f-j--i-~-~-
lllillUJ_J_j__L_..L...l.J.....J~
--'r:··
I,
---
'
[\;
I-~~--_. .... ..c. • .,."'. . ·-
1: ::;:::,:::~~;:;:-;,\::, :;,; ;: ;;; ;:;; ;;;.; ; ;.: :;;;; I
~ . ~ .. APPROXIMATE SCALE
800 0 800 FEET
I
I
CF__._t=t_c::1 E-r=:====
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
CITY OF
WINSTON-SALEM,
NORTH CAROLINA
FORSYfH COUNTY
PANEL 45 OF 75
COMMUNITY -PANEL NUMBER
375360 0045 F
MAP REVISED:
JANUARY 5, 1984
Federal Emergency Management Agency
D
(ij
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
KEY TO MAP
500-Year Flood Boundary-----
100-Year Flood Boundary-----
Z.onc Designations*
100-Year Flood Boundary-----
500-Year Flood Bounctary-----
Basc Flood Elevation Linc
With Elevation In Feet"°"
Base Flood Elevation in Feel (EL 9871
Where Uniform Within Zone*•
Elevation Reference ivlark RM7x
Zone D Boundary--------
Rivcr Mile •M1.5
n Referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929
•EXPLANATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS
ZONE
A
AO
AH
A 1-AJ0
A99
B
C
D
V
V1-V30
EXPLANATION
Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and
f:ood hazard factors not determined.
Areas of 1 OD-year shallow flooding where depths
are between one (1) ,rnd three (3) feet; average depths
of inur,Jation are shown, but no flood ha,.ard factors
are det-:.rmined.
Areas of 100-year shallow flooding where depths
are between one (1) and tlirec (3) feet; hase flood
elevations are shown, but no flood haz.ard factors
are determined.
Areas of 100-year flood; b;1se flood e!evatlons and
tlood hazard factors determined.
Areas c,f 1 00-year flood to be protected by flood
protecthrn system under construction; base flood
elevations and flood hazard factors not determined.
Are,1s between limits of the 100-year tlood and 500-
year flood; or certain a.-eas subject to 1 00-year flood-
ing with average depths less than one {1) foot or where
the contributing drainage area is less than one square
mile; or areas protected by levees from the base flood.
(Medium shading)
Areas af minimal flooding. (No sllading)
Areas of undetermined, but possible, flood haz;nds.
Areas of 100-year coastal flood with velocity {wave
action); base flood elevations and floQd ha~.ird factors
nae determined.
Areas of 100-year coastal flQod with velocity {wave
action); base flood elevations and flood ha1.ard !actors
determined.
NOTES TO USER
C!"rlain areas nut in !he special flood hi1,.;1rd dte.is (zone\,\ ;rnd V)
may be protected by flood contr-::-il structures.
fhis rlliip is '.or floud insurance purpuse~ only; it dot:s not nt:1..r!S·
~arily show ,111 are;is subject to flooding in the com1m:nity or
.ill planimctric features outside special flood h;,zc:rd areas .
For adjoining map p;inels, see separately printed Index To t.'!ap
Panels.
INITIAL IDENTIFICATION:
AUGUST 31, 1972
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
JOINS PANEL 25
/
R-5
R-6
.,
. ·r· .. ··
~
/
--~------~-------r-
I
11--.,
'· '
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Reprint from North carollna Administrative Code: 15A NCAC 28 .0309
Current through: February 1, 1993
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EHNR -ENVIRONMENT11L MANAGEMENT TISA: 02/J .0300
SECTION .0300 -ASSIGNMENT OF STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS
.0301 CLASSIFICATIONS: GENERAL
(a) Schedule of Classificatio"ns. The classifications ~;signed to the waters of the State of North Carolina
are set forth in the schedules of classifications and water quality standards assigned to the waters of the river basins of North Carolina, 15A NCAC 2B .0302 to .0317. These classifications are based upon the existing or contertplated best usage of the various streams and segments of streams in the basin, as determ:ned through studies _and evaluations and the hnk''.ng of public hearings for consideration of the classifications proposed.
(b) Stream Names. The names of the. streams listed in the schedules of assigned classifications were taken as far as possible from United States Geological Survey topographic maps. Where topographic maps were unavailable, U.S. Corps_ of Engineers maps, U.S. Department of Agriculture soil maps, and North Carolina highway maps were used for the selection of stream names.
(c) Classifications. The classifications assigned to the waters of North Carolina are denoted by the letters WS-1, WS-11, WS-III, WS-IV, WS-V, B, C, SA, ·ss, and SC in th-: column headed "class.". A brief explanation of the "best usage" for which the waters in each class must be protected is given as follows:
Fresh Waters
Class WS-1:
Class WS-11:
Class WS-III:
Class WS-IV:
Class WS-V:
Class B:
Class C:
"fidal Salt Waters
·class SA:
Class SB:
Class SC:
waters protected as water supplies which are in natural and undeveloped watersheds;
point source discharges of treated wastewater are permitted pursuant to Rules .0 I 04
and .0211 of this Subchapter; ,,,cal programs to control nonpoiot source and
stormwater discharge cf pollutior. are required; suitable for all Class C uses;
waters protected as wata supplies which are generally in predominantly undeveloped
watersheds; point source discharges of treated wastewater are permitte-.:l pursuant to
Rules .0104 and .0211 of this Subchapter; local programs to control oonpoict source
·and stormwater discharge of polh;tion are required; suitable for all Class C uses;
waters protected as water supplies which are generally in low to moderately
developed watersheds; point source discharges of treated wastewater are permitted
pursuant to Rules .0104 and .02! I of this Subchapter; local programs to control
nonpoint source and storm water discharge of pollution are required; suitable for all
Class C uses;
waters ;,rotected as water supplies which are generally in moderately to highly
developed watersheds; point source discharges of treated wastewater are permitted
pursuant to Rules .O!Oe and .02 l l of this Subchapter; local programs to control
nonpoint source and stormwater discharge of pollution are required; suitable for all
Class C uses;
waters protected as water sur:,plies which are generally upstream and draining to
Class WS-IV waters; no categorical restrictions on watershed development or treated
wastewater discharges are required, however, the Commission or its designee may
apply .appropriate management requirec,1ents as deemed necessary for the. protection
of downstrean1 receiving waters (15A NCAC 2B .0203); suitable for a!! Class C
uses;
primary recreation and any other usage specified by the "C" classification;
aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and
agriculture.
shellfishing for market purposes and any other usage specified by tae "SB" and "SC"
classification;
primary recreation and any other usage specified by the "SC" classification;
aquatic iifc pro?agation an~ .survival, fishing, wildlife, and st:.eondary recreation.
NORTH C,iROLINA ADMINTSTRA1TVF rnnF ·,..·Tn/22/9)
I EHNR -ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMEN'r
I
I Muddy Creek . From· ·SOurce _to"'.FoiSyth-Davi~On ·coUilty ··~ C. ·-;:·;.°'.
,~: 1 Liri€ ···.-. · ,a;· • • , . · • -. :,7••;·
Barkers Creek /~om source to ,Huddy Creek '··-··c ·r 1.
I Parkers Creek From source to Barkers Creek ·c .
Beaver Dam Creek From source to Mud.a}' Creek c
spe!as Lake Entint lake and ·COnnecting stream to " C
Muddy Creek C
I Mill Creek No, 3 From source to Muddy Creek ' C
Bill Branch From Source to Muddy Creek C
Oil Mill Branch From· sOurce to Muddy Creek C
I Mill Creek from source to· Mllcidy Creek C
Fivemile Branch From source to Mill Creek C
Dalton Pond Entire pond and connecting stream to C
Fi vemile Branch
I Jones Pond Entire pond and connecting stream to C
Fivem.ile Bra'lch
Pineview Lake Entire lake and connecting stream to C
Fivemile sra1ch
Ogburn Branch From source to Mill Creek C
Grassy Creek From source to Mill Creek C
Leak Fork From source to Mill Creek C
Monarcas Creek Frcm source to Mill Creek C
Crystal Lake Entire lake and connecting stream to C
Mill Creek
I Clinard lake Entire lake and connecting stream to C
Mill Creek
James Branch Fiom source to Muddy Creek C
I Reynolds Creek From source to Muddy Creek C
Tomahawk Creek From source to Reynolds Creek C
Silas Creek From source to Muddy Creek C
I Little Creek From source to Muddy Creek C
Salem Creek (Middle Fork From source to Winston-Salem Water WS-III CA
Muddy Creek, Saler:: Lake) Supply Dam (Salem Lake)
I
Kerners Mill Creek From source to a point O .1 mile WS-III
downstream of I-40
Smith Creek From source to Kerners Hill Creek WS-III
Kerners Hill Creek From a point 0.1 mile downstream of WS·III CA
I-40 to Salem Lake, Salem Creek
Fishers Branch From source to a point O. 6 mile WS-III I ;;pstream of mouth
I Fishers Branch From a point 0.6 mile upstream of WS-III CA
mouth to Kerners Mill Creek
Lowery Mill Creek From source to a point O. 6 mile up-WS-III
stream of mouth .. Martin Mill Creek Fr.~ s_ource __ to Lowery Mill Creek WS-III
Lowery Mill Creek From a point 0.6 mi.le upstream of WS-III CA
I 14
I
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
8/3/92
B/3/92
8/3/92
B/3/92
8/3/92
B/3/92
B/3/92
8/3/92
8/3/92
12-94-(0,5)
12-94· 1
12-94-1 · l
12-94-2
12-94-3
12-94-4
12-94-5
12-94-6
12-94-7
12-94-7-1
12-94-7-1-1
12-94-7-1-2
12-94-7-1-3
12-94-7-2
12-94·7·3
12-94-7-4
12-94-7-5
12-94-7-6
12-94-7-7
12-94-8
12-94-9
12-94·9-1
12-94-10
12-94-11
12-94-12-(1)
12-94-12-2-(0,3)
12-94-12·2-1
12-94-12-2-(1.5)
12·94-12-2-2-(1)
12-94-12-2-2-(2)
12-94-12-3-(0,5)
12-94-12-3-1
12-94-12-3-(2)
'Yf;
-·~ ':i ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EHNR -ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMEN'l
.0309 YADKlN-PEE DEE RIVER BASJN
Name of Stream
Sa]em"Creek (Middle Fork
Muddy Creek)
Myers Pond
Brushy Fork
Frazier Creek (Winston
Lake)
Brushy Fork Branch
Tar Branch
Peters Creek
Burke Creek
Muddy Creek
South Fork Muddy Creek
Swaim Creek
Sawmill Branch
Hines Lake
Fiddlers Creek
Soakas Creek
Perryrran Branch
Sides Branch
Leak Creek
Hartman Branch
Miller Creek
Miller Creek
Fryes Creek
Fryes Creek
Peoples Creek
Reedy Creek
Description
mouth to Salem Lake, Salem Creek
Creek '
Frcxn · Winstoh-Salem·· water Supply Dam
(Salem Lake} to Muddy Creek
Entire pond and connecting stream to
Salem Creek
From source to Salem Creek (Middle
Fork Muddy Creek)
From source to Brushy Fork
From source to Frazier Creek
from source to Salem Creek (Middle
Fork Muddy Creek)
From sow-ce to Salem Creek (Middle
Fork Muddy Creek)
From source to Salem Creek (Middle
Fork Muddy Creek)
From Forsyth-Davidson County Line
to Yadkin River
From source to Muddy Creek
From source to South Fork Muddy
Creek
From source to South Fork Muddy
Creek
Entire lake and connecting stream
to Sawmill Branch
From-source to South Fork Muddy
Creek
From source to South Fork Muddy
Creek
From source to South Fork Muddy
Creek
From source to South Fork Muddy
Creek
From source to South Fork Muddy
Creek
Class
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
WS-IV
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
From source to Leak Creek· C
Fran source to Davidson County SR 1516. C
Fran Davidson County SR 1516 to Muddy WS-IV
Creek
From source to a point 0.3 mile up-C
stream of Davidson County SR 1512
From a point 0.3 mile upstream of WS-IV
Davidson County SR 1512 to Muddy Creek
From source to Yadkin River WS-IV
From source to Yadkin River WS-IV
15
2B .0300
Classification
Date Index No.
8/1/85
8/1/85
3/1/77
3/1/77
3/l/77
3/1/77
3/1/77
3/1/77
8/3/92
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
3/1/77
9/1/74
9/l/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
8/3/92
9/1/74
8/3/92
8/3/92
8/3/92
12-94-12-(4)
12-94-12-5
12-94-12-6
12-94-12-6-1
12-94-12-6-1-1
12-94-12-7
12-94-12-8
12-94-12-9
12-94-(12.5)
12-94-13
12-94-13-1
12-94-13-2
12-94-13-2-1
12-94-13-3
12-94-13-4
12-94-13-5
12-94-13-6
12-94-13-7
12-94-13-7-1
12-94-14-(1)
12-94-14-(2)
12-94-15-(1)
12-94-15-(2)
12-95
12-96
I
I ._
I
I
I
I
I
I
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ti
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
Memorandum
Date: July 23, 1998
To: File
From: Douglas Moore ~8-tU---
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
Subj.: Flow Calculations
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, NC
US EPA ID: NCO 000 770 487
The flow for drainages downstream of the subject site were calculated using the drainage area
calculation from USGS Open File Report 83-211 (attachment 1) titled "Drainage Areas of Selected
Sites on Streams in North Carolina", multiplied by the mean annuil runoff (cfs/sq. Mile of drainage
area) from plate 1 of USGS Water Supply Paper 2403 (attachment 2) titled "Low Flow
Characteristics of Streams in North Carolina .
1. Lowery Mill Creek at US 158 nr. Winston Salem
2.76 square mile drainage x 1.00 cfs/sq. mile= 2.76 cubic feet per second
2. Lowery Mill Creek at Mth nr. Winston-Salem
8.58 square mile drainage x 1.00 cfs/sq. Mile= 8.58 cubic feet per second
3. Salem Creek at Salem Lake Dam
27.2 square mile drainage x 1.00 cfs/sq. Mile= 27.2 cubic feet per second
4. Salem Creek nr. Muddy Creek
70.6 square mile drainage x 1.00 cfs/sq. Mile= 71 cubic feet per second.
(Attachments)
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t"
I
I
I
I
I
I
' ..
I
I
Low-Flow Characteristics, of
Streams in North Carolina
\ By G.L. GIESE and ROBERT R. MASON, Jr.
Prepared in cooperation with the
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2403
I
Prepared in cooperation with the
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT,
:(jf(} ,_, ____________ H_E_A_L_TH_, A_N_D_N_A_TU_R_A+; L_RE_s_o_u_R_c_E_s _____ -----tl
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t!!lilll!llllii!iililllll!li!lilillli
l!ili 11 I l!il i iii ii !iii I III\IIIJI
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t'
I
I
I
UNITED 'STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIO
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
DRAINAGE AREAS OF SELECTED SITES ON STREAMS IN NOR]H CAROLINA
By Robert L. Meikle
Open-File Report 83-211
I Prepared in cooperation with the
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
RESOURCES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
i·
Raleigh, North Carolina
1983
nm~··rE¥?ZC7 rr:
I .. I I I I ,I ., 1 'I I . ' ·tt I I I I I 1:: .. I I ST>,TJCl~ MJMOEf! 0211574fli)0 02115750<)0 0211s·1s·c,:i<J 021 LS"/~.F.()S 0,~ l 1 S7F.R()O 021 IST.'01 l 0211S2,)0.Xl 021 ! SB(h~oc, 021 1 sso .. 00 021JSEJ0()l1 02l ! 582000 0211c;g3000 021 l SB:Jl s,J 021 l 5232')0 Oi'!i1SE3]1,7 021158337€, 1l211S8.B80 02 l l 5833·)5 0211533,,00 0211c;231;,~0 02! 158]")30 02t !SRJ·.140 021 ISB::t•J'!S 021 !S84(\v\, 02115?.<[phone] 0211r,a .. soo 021158SOC,O •'.:12! 1585075 021 ! 565200 021 ISBSS"lO 021 !S85S75 021158S600 (,211585700 021158S800 0211 58[-000 0211586500 0211sasE-OO 021 !S8E-8liQ 021158':-f'ln 021 l 58€-RSO 021158S'JSO 0211587()()0 oa11 sa1200 021158.750 0211587800 02i lS88-300 021!58841S 021JS8'C'Oll0 021 l S';.l\_100() 02115"342€,0 02115·3.;:ioo 02115'34E-$5 021 :s·3.;ssn 0211 5")',fi'J;I 021 IS':'',90() 02115'35100 0211535225 02115'353\0 .0211s·~s31s 0211535',0Q 021 I S97600 02115'37750 0211599710 021159'3740 o.:!1159'3810 0211 5'3'3950 021 \E,00000 0211€.11500 02!1G11550 02l!E-2Sl00 0211U,'370S 02l 164'cl725 0211 G4·H75 021 lf.4'379S 021 IE-49810 0211E,4'clR;IO 021164'3850 0211£.SOOOO 021 \E,SOORS 0211657710 0211657745 021 !6S777S 021 IE-SBIOO 02116E-25SO UF'f'"FI'<: vr,C'f< TN R.I ··~•f='.:r'<' -c:pr-..i-r J.1'-.IUEO· ST,\TlrJrJ NA,-.,r. ~IU(lnY C rtfl ,; T'.JIJOn r,,_,ooy C r-lR LF~JJSVILLf. SlLMS C ,<T 0•\M Ml /\l":JPAll(:11 8lLAS CAT WJ/JSTDfl $,<l.FM SILAS C NR HArFS :;(L,\S C AT SR 1133 NR WINSfON Sf,Lf"M SIi.AS C N's Cl. EJ1.t'ONS l.11TI F. C ;,T SEO ,-1y l"IWNl r:; I ITTI.E C BL SEO Al l,l'~.1(1('11') l { TTI F. C !-IP C"U'J'll'"CNS Ml.DOY C NR CLEMMON$ SMITH C r/R l'FRNl:RSV/1 l..l" KCRNF:RS MIi.i. C AT SR ic1f.4'.'I NR KERNfRSVTLLE KER~ERS MILL C AT SR 2E-S7 NR C:UTl--<RIE FISHERS f1 ;,T MTH NR 1-1.fTI-IP IF .l:Cl-JERY.::-Mlll C AT US !58 I~ WltJSTON SALEM MARTIN MlLL C AT MTH NR W,l,LKl":PTllWN 1;.QWER'rMILL C AT MTH l'F lol/NSICIN SALEM tSALEM C .-,J SALEM LAI!!;: OMM ElRUSIIY FAT US Jll Ml WIN'.;1Tn1 ~\ALEM FRAZIER C AT SR 2351 NP WA\ KERTOWrJ BRUSHY F Fl AT US .cl\ 1 NR W[~ISTnN S,\L.[~I~ FRA7.1FR C ,;f MTH ;,y l>/JN$T(l'l S>""-.t.EM 8RUS!-r>' F AT l>l!NST(V,J i:lALEM SALF.M C RL flRIISIW C AT WINSTf1N SAi i,M ·TAR f1 AT WAU<UT ST WINSTClN SALFM PETERS C Al WINSfflN $,',LEM SALEM C AT WINSTON SALEM SALFM r. TRIR AT MTH NR WINSTON SALFM SALEM C NFS F!V£ POINT R\.JRKE B AT SH.AS C PhRKl>IAY ~J!NSTON 5/ILEM SALEM C NR HCIClTSTOWN SALEM C tJR AT~ SALEM C NR l>IJNSH1N SAi.EM 'SALFM-C NR r-u:x)Y CREEK MUDD'{ C NR Mu[)ny CRFFH SWAIM C AT US 31 l NP l!Nlfl'I CRClSS S F Ml.OOY C t.R E"ASTl7N VIEW C> F MUDDY C riR UNIO~I CROSS FIOOI FRS C IIR U•HON CR0'3S FIOOLFRS C Al US, 3U NR l'NIOl'l CROSS FIDOI.ERS CAT SR 270(1 NR WH.-STrlN SALEM F!DO!.ERS C rJR WINSTCK'l S-'ILEM SF MLJOOY C AT 2743 NR lJNJf)rl RIDGE SOAK AS C AT SR t 706 NP PD'3Ef'IO',IT SIJAKAS C IJP ROSEMONT. SOAl<AS C AT MTI-I NR WION Rlr>CF. PF.RRYMAN R ,\T MTH NR WINSTON SALEM S F MIJODY C NR WINSTON SALFM S F MLODY C NP CLEMM'"'NS MILLER C /JR ARCADIA r-l...001 C TP!R MR ARCADIA FR YES C AT SR 1505 NR FNH;RPR /SE FRYES C AT SR 1515 NR ENTERPRISF. FRYE"S C AT r¥.'. lSO rm ARCA(l/A FRYES C NR ARCADIA Ml.ODY C AT Ao~CADIA MIJOQY (. TRlR NR ARCADIA t>UODY C TRIS ,;; MTH NR ARCADIA J'1..JOOY C TRIS AT SR 14'35 NR ARCADIA l'l.OOY C MR ARCADIA YAOKIN R NR ARCAOIA PEOPLE"S \, AT SR ISSO ~IR ADVAN".:F. REEDY C AT SR 1502 ~ WE!...COl't=" REErw _'; AT SR 1472 NR WELCOME' REEDY C AT SR 1477 ~ REEOY CREFK REr::DY C TRW AT SR 146R NR CIIARYTOelN Rf.E'IW C NR YAD!<lN COLI EGE fl.FFMANS CAT SR 1481 ~ ENTFRPRISE HUFFMANS C AT SR J 4·4~, AT REEnY CREF.1< REEDY C r:,,R REEDY CRFE"K •. YAOt<lN R TRIR NR FORK CHURCH CARTER C·AT SR lf.17 NR BIXBY <"Al'ITFR C AT NC 801 NR FORK CH.JACH YAn+<!N R TRIR A_T FORK CHRUCH DLN-<ERS C AT SR 1443 NR Cu=!RYTOWf< QYKERS C TRlB f\l'l REEDS X ROS OYKERS C•AT MTH AT YAOklN CCLlECF YADKIN Ri AT YAO!<IN CCLI.EGE GOBflLE•C_AT MTH NR .-i:AOKIN,CDl..l.EC!: YADKIN R AT PETERSVJl.LE HARTLEY C A8 SANDY C NR\PETERSVILLE SANDY c:aL 1--'ARTLEV,C AT PETERSVILLE MILL C AT. MTH AT; PF.TERSVJLLE . YAOK I~ R, A8 OUTCI-MAN C, NR FQAK 91 ORA!Nf,GE .\1'11:A (SQ M[) --· n, 2.00 75 ~.ffl 10.2 11.') 3.J5 s.~ 6.74 111. ,.oo 3.00 a. E-3 2. 74 'IT6°~ 3."G·J , ,e:se:c.-.2,:2~ 1. 57 2. J·~ 1.83 E,.6S 11.'3 42.S O.E-0 s. 18 52.,? 3. 78 58. S 1. 25 €-3. 3 65.6 €-7. 3 c•o:&2 18(,. 1. 58 4.25 6.67 2.26 -~ 8.~ 9.74 21.0 3.03 ,.& ,.m ,n n, u., 2. 24 3. '35 4.01 7.46 ·]. 12 10. 7 21,1. 2.98 1. 70 J.21 259. 2227. 1. 97 ,.w 3.57 7.E,5 3.02 12. I 2.22 5.2S 21.2 t. 83 4.04 8. 18 1.83 1.60 2.25 8.65 2280. 4. 72 22"30. ··"' 1.47 7. 12 2300. SITE !'<PE LAT " I 3f.0425 0\ 3£.0310 20 ::JE-071,2 20 3E.Q552 20 3601,53 ,0 I 3GO'<G 01 , 36()!!44 11 'JE,Oi,j.C, ! 1 3€,0301 o:i :ie:.021·c1 .. I"'°'"' 02 3€-0':-1'3 20 3G0737 20 3E-065'J 20 3\:,0G3E, ,o \"'08,0 20 3(,0730 20 3G065J 20 36051,S 2,J 3E-OEN9 ao 13607S7 20 3£.074S 20 3E-OE,42 02 3E.OS57 20 360S1 4 20 03 3GQS02 31SOS03 01 1360406 20 13£0353 20 :3E,Q318 03 kso-'I\O 20 360253 01 i'J602JO 20 pso1S3 " o, 20 3€-0031 I ;ISOOO! 360326 20 BE-0241 02 Bw211 20 3601,49 LONG eo21sc, 802210 80170•• 801")14 002031 80210':I 3021 tS 801 ';;153 802020 f.l020•,E, 802116 BOOE,!') BOOE,4<J 80081,') t!O'Jll1-BOOS40 BOO·cl'.il 801029 801132 801238 IW\112 80120"9 801235 8O13(V, 801 317 801'•3'• 801530 8015<+6 !J01E.02 801 70"3 80170('. 801747 8018:.5 8018S1 802007 80202S 800B4"/ 80100\i. B0104€. 80080'3 au;.D NM!€ ;.JJNSTCIN-SALF.M WEST . WUJSTON·SALEM WEST RI.Jl"lAL HALL WJNSTQr<-SALfM WEST Wll'lSTnN-S,,LFM ,ir::sT W[NSTON-S,\l.(1'1 wrcsT W!NC>TDN-GAUOM wl::ST WHISTnr..t-SALEM WEST WIN'3TON-Sr,t.u,·. WEST WINSTON-SA! C~l ~1r:.sr WINSlON-S..t..f..M Wl'"<lT l(ERNERSVJLI.E 8El.!.EWS CRFFK WJNSTClH-SAl.F.:M FAST 'IINSTOM-S/~.l::M E:/\'H "'-ALKERTOWM ,1,\LKER TOWN WINSTON-SALEM EAST WINSlrt-l·St,LEM E,,.SI WINSHIN·SALE::M EA',;r WAl:KERTnw, WALKER TOWM WHJSTON-SALEM E.\ST WlNSTnr.-sr,LEM E,\ST W[NSTO'<-S,\LF.M i=:r,sr WlNSTOr,-s.,1_EM WINSlON-S.!,Ui.M W!NSTON-SAl. FM E,\ST Wlc':'3T ~s-: W!Ns-,r-~1-SAUCM W[C::;1 WJNSTC"N-SALEM WEST WlNSTOt<•Sl•Ll!M ,11:::~lT ,_WlNSTCt•HiAL~ WF.ST , WJNSTON-SALF.M ~IF.Sf WJNSTON-SAl:F.M ;..r;:sT WINSTON-SAL.EM ~l W!NSTON·SALEM WCST WlN'3f0tl-SAl.E:M E.\S1 W!NSrDN-SALEM EAST WINSTQN-SALEM EAST WJNSTD'<-SALEM :C:AST. I 20 3E.040'3 20 )E-0309 o, )G021•E· 3E-0202 3E-005R I ,o ,, 800948 ."\,jlNSTON-SALEM E.:,3T 8011°19 WINSTD'-1-SALEM U,ST l:!011'•!3 WlNSTON•SAU!~I F.AST 801255." WJNSTCN-5.;1._EM EAST 80124E-W!NSTON·SMLEM E.\ST 02 3€-0053 20 360110 20 JSOlOJ 11 3€-0038 01 JS0022 I 20 3S5'30'3 02 35S'317 20 3S5728 20 ~5-,,,9 20 355812 I 02 3SS84f. 11 JS583E, 20 355750 20 355738 20 3S5S22 I l l 35S624 02 3SS51 •) 20 3$5527 B0140€. 801450 80150f; B01£1~ 801807 801 635 801854 801521 801 702 801 745 801922 802021 802042 802053 802102 80212") 80221 3 80224'3. 355 552 BOIE-21 20 355515 801648 I 20 3$5447 80175'• 20 3S5428 • 801'310 01 355445 801'335 ~g ~:~:~r :g!~~~, I • . . • Wli'<'STO'J-SN.EM EAST WlNSTQl'l·l5,,Lf:.M EAST WINSTnN-SALf':M ~ST WJNs·:,,t<-SALEM WEST WINSP11'1•S,,LF.M WEST WELCOME WELCOME WELCOl".E l,£LCOME WF.:U".:OME \o€LCO."'c WELCOME WELCOME l,£LCOME'. WE::LCOME WELCOl'E; WELCOME ADVANCE WELCOME WELC!JME WELCOME WELCOME WELCOl'E WF.LCOl"IE WEL~□.i:ir. ll 3S5429 · 802130 WELCOME ~ ~~~;~ :~~;.~.~~~~ '20 35S317 802'•5€-'ADVANCE 20 3S5250 802501 ADVANCE I "· .: 20 • 35534"3 ; 802103 ', WELCOME 20 355214 T 802143 LEXINGTON WEST·' 20 35S1 JS 802312 CI-WCH..ANO 01 3S5124 • 802310 CHUACHl.ANO 20 3SS036' 802:lc'I CHURCH..Ai'O , j· ... , !·g~g~,.)g ' 20 _ 354'345 .. 802549 20 < 354940 802402 20 ·•35i,941 ••502401 20 • 35~'343 ~: 802546 20 355013 • 'B0c814. ,. CHURCHL.AND CHURCl--t..AND ~HURCH..Al'O ' . , . .,. . r;OUNTY COOF. °"' OE,7 0€,7 Of,7 ,)57 OE-7 ()\."i 067 067 067 oc,, Of.7 oc, Qf',7 06_7 OG7 06' oc,, Gf,7 0(,7 OC7 0€,7 0(.7 007 0(~7 OE,7 os, 057 057 on OC7 OC,7 060 GE,7 Of.7 067 on or-.1 Cfl 067 Ofl os, "" oc,, o,;7 o,,, 067 057 OC.7 OG7 057 057 057 057 °'' 057 057 057 057 057 057 OS, oso 057 057 057 057 057 057 o.s7 057 OS, . ""' OS, 059 057 ·057 057 057 057 057 ;g~~ 057 059
I ' . I I
I
I
I
I
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
It
I
I
•
I
It
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
Memorandum
Date: April 24, 1997
To: File
From: Douglas Moore ~a..,1rr---
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
Subj.: Fishery Information for Salem Lake
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, NC
US EPA ID: NCD 000 770 487
On April 24, I 997, I spoke with Officer Cary Bostic, District 7 -N.C. Wildlife Resources
Commission [phone]. Officer Bostic stated that he has not checked people fishing at Lowery
Mill Creek and did not know if there were access points. He stat~d that he has observed people ' fishing from the bank at the Old Greensboro Road bridge, which is downstream of Lowery Mill
Creek confluence. He stated that the lake belongs to Winston-Salerii and he referred me to Dianne
Peck, City of Winston-Salem Parks and Recreation, for more inforAiation about fishing .
I contacted Mrs. Dianne Peck, [phone] ,about fishing in Salel Lake. Mrs. Peck stated that
people occasionally fish from the bank at the Greensboro Road bridge, and rent boats from the city
of Winston-Salem Parks and Recreation to fish Salem Lake. The lakJ contains bass, bream, crappie,
catfish and bodie bass.
I
le
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
Memorandum
Date: April 23, 1997
To:
From:
File
Douglas Moore
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
Subj.: Natural Heritage Program File Review
Johnson Controls -Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, NC
US EPA ID: NCO 000 770 487
On Wednesday, April 23, 1997, Douglas Moore of the NC Superfund Section visited the N.C.
Natural Heritage Program, located in the Archdale Building Jt downtown Raleigh, to review the site
maps and species information for any endangered, threateAed or special concern species located
within a 4 mile radius of the site and in the downstream shrface water pathway from the site. I
I
reviewed the site maps for Belews Creek, Kernersville, Walkertown and Winston-Salem East
quadrangles. No federal or state designated endangered, thre~tened or special concern species were
identified on these maps within a 4.0 mile radius of thJ site. Likewise, no federal or state
endangered, threatened, or special concern species were ideritified on the quadrangles downstream
I
of the site in the overland drainages, Lowery Mille Creek, Salem Lake and Salem Creek to Winston-
Salem.
I ..
I
I
SOIL SURVEY OF
Forsyth County, North Carolina
United States Department of Agriculture
Soil ConserJation Service
In cooperatio~ with
I
North Carol'na Agricultural Experiment Station
·f' , ... \ •1,•.i
}1,i.,. _t;i;1r-') 116 SOIL SURVEY -·,,J ~ .~fA
surface runoff is rapid. Unless limed, these soils are very strongly acid or strongly acid throughout: ~~ Most of the acreage is in forest, to which the soils _are · ~ited. These soils are fairly easy to keep in good tilth and can be worked throughout a wide range of mois-ture content. Crops respond well to application~ ~f I fertilizer and lime. This mapping unit has severe limi-tations for most nonfarm uses because of slope and depth to bedrock. Capability unit VIIe-1; woodland
1 suitability group 3r8.
Madison Series
The Madison series consists of well-drained, gently I sloping to steep soils on uplands. T_hese soils formed. in residuum that •weathered from mica schist and mica gneiss. . In a representative profile the surf~ce layer is I reddish-brown fine sandy loam about 6 mches thick. The subsoil about 28 inches thick, is red, firm clay and clay loam. Below these layers, and extending_to a depth of about 58 inches is mottled red and yellowish-brown, i I partly weathered 'mica gneiss and schist that crushes to sandy clay loam. . . Madison soils are low in natural ferbhty and I organic-matter content. Permeability is moderate, and the available water capacity is medium. The _effective rooting zone is moderately deep, and the _shrmk-swell potential is low. Unless limed, these soils are very I strongly acid to medium acid throughout. Depth to the seasonal high water table is more than 5 feet .. About half of the acreage is pastured or cultivated, 1d the rest is in forest or nonfarm uses. Slope and derate permeability are the most important limita-ns to the use of these soils. Representative profile of Madison fine sandy loam, · 6 to 10 percent slopes, 12 miles northeast of Winston-
•
Salem on U.S. Highway 158, 1 mile northwest on State Road 1971, 500 feet north of State Road 1971, and 150 feet east of State Road 1967:
I
I
I
I
I
Ap-0 to 6 inches .reddish-brown (5YR 4/3) fine ~andy loam; weak,· fine, granular structure; very fna?Ie; many fine roots; few to common fine flakes of !111ca; few fine quartz and mica schist fragments; slightly acid; abrupt, smooth boundary. B2t-6 to 28 inches, red (2.5YR 4/6) clay; weak and mod-erate, medium, subangu!a~ blocky structure; firr:n, sticky and slightly plastic; few fine roots; .thm continuous clay films on_ faces of pe_ds; few medium-sized fragments of ·gneiss and_ schist; com.man fine flakes of mica; medium acid; gradual, irregular boundary. B3t-28 to 34 inches, red (2.5YR 4/6) clay loan:; wco~k, fine subangular blocky structure; firm, sticky and slightly plastic; thin patchy. clay films o,~ face~ of peds; many fine flakes of nuca; few medrnm f1~g-ments of weathered and partly weathered mica gneiss and mica schist; medium acid; gradual, ir-regular boundary. . C-34 to 58 inches mottled re<l (2.5YR 4/6) and yellowish-brown (16YR 5/6) partly weathered mica gneiss and schist that crushes to sandy clay loam; mas-sive; friable; slightly sticky; many fine flakes of mica; medium acid.
The solum ranges from 20 to 45 inches in thickness. Depth to bedrock is 3 to 5 feet or more. Mica flakes are hroughout the profile. Mica schist and mica gneiss fra~-ments are on the surface and throughout the profile rn laces. The A horizon is reddish-brown or yellow1sh-~ed to ark-brown fine sandy loam or clay loam 3 to 8 rnches
• ·1,i ,,.;; thick. The B horizon is 17 to 37 inches thick. The B2t ho·-.,:~i~ rizon is red clay. The B2t horizon is red to yellowish-red --t-t clay aiid clay loam. The C horizon is red to reddish-yellow·":, clay Io3.m to sandy loam that is mottled in many places. • )_•;:l'J! • I • ',;,;'· Madison fine.sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (MaB)~.~-...:..._This is la well-drained soil on uplands. It is on undu'(il?-ef, , lating, fairly narrow ridges in areas that range from m, · 2 to 45 acres in size. t~'t The surface layer is yellowish-brown to dark-brown, .. fine sand~ loam 4 to 8 inches thick. The subsoil _is red:: to yellowish-red clay to sandy clay loam 20 to 37 mches:· fuick I -~ In~luded with this soil in mapping are areas where1~ rock fragtjients are both on the surface and throu_ghout_:_-the soils and a few areas that are darker red m the · surface layer and upper part of the· subsoil. Also in-.• eluded arelareas of Pacolet and Enon soils. ·: Infiltratjon is moderate, '.'nd surface runoff is_ me-/jw;, dium. Unless hmed, this soil 1s very strongly acid to /If medium acid throughout the profile. . ·. , · Most of! the acreage is cultivated or pastured, and · -;~, the rest is in forest or other uses. This soil is well suited 'It½• to most locally grown crops. Small grain, corn, tobacco, '.r and soybeans are the main crops. Because of slope, the hazard of erosion is moderate if the soil is used for row crops. Practices arc needed that control runoff and erosion. TI\is soil is fairly easy to keep in good tilth and can be' worked throughout a fairly wide range of moisture content. Crops respond well to applications of fertilizer and lime. This soil has moderate to severe limitations 'for most nonfarm uses because of slope and moderate permeability. Capability unit lle-1; wood-land suitability group 3o7.
J\-fadison \ fine sandy 10am, 6 lo 10 percent al.opes (MaC).-This is a well-drained soil on uplands. lt is on fairly narrow upper side slopes in areas that range from 2 to 40 acres in size. This soil has the profile described as representative of the series . Included {vith this soil in mapping are areas that are darker red in the surface layer and upper part of the subsoil. Also included are a few small areas of Pacolet and Enon soils.
Infiltratio\i is moderate, and surface runoff is rapid. Unless limed this soil is very strongly acid to medium ', acid througliout.
About half of the acreage is cultivated or pastured, and the resti is in forest or other uses. This soi_] is well suited to most locally grown crops. Small gram, corn, tobacco and soybeans are the main crops. Because of slope, the lu{zard of erosion is severe if the soil is used for row crods. Practices are needed that control runoff and erosion.\ This soil is fairly easy to keep in good til.th and can be worked throughout a fairly wide range of moisture content. Crops respond well to applica-tions of fertilizer and lime. This soil has moderate limitations for most nonfarm uses because of slope and moderate pehncability. Capability unit I IIe-1; wood-land suitability group 3o7.
Madison fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes (MaD)."-This !is a well-draihcd soil on uplands. lt is on lower side slopes and m irregularly shaped areas on sloping topography. Areas range from 2 to 80 acres in size. I . . The surface layer 1s yellowish-brown to brown fine sandy loam 4 to 7 inches thick. The subsoil is red to
"~·
: .....
:'1"·
,,,1·.· .. ·
..
-~.t,' ' . ' ·r;
(.· '\
''i"'
' ' i' !-
! '"•J ~ l,!I ' .. " •g Itt . C I .. ,---,,,] ~-i ~,
I
It
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
•
I
g
(
I
Site Name: Johnson Controls
Site Number:·NCD 000 770 487
Site Location: Kernersville, Forsyth County, N.C.
Date:
Latitude: 36 07 09.0
Longitude: 080 09 40.0
January 06, 1998
Calculation Results
Distance from
Site Location
Population
Per Ring Cumulative
0 to 1/4 mile 53 53
> 1/4 to 1/2 mile 183 236
> 1/2 to I mile I, 149 1,385
> I to 2 miles 4,710 6,095
· >2 to 3 miles 12,045 I 8,140
>3 to 4 miles 23,547 41,687
Number of Households
Per Ring Cumulative
23 23
92 I i 5
491 606
1,834 2,440
4,647 7,087
9,927 17,014
Note: The populations and number of households within specified target distance rings were
I
calculated for the NC Superfund Section by the NC G:enter for Geographic Information
and Analysis using the 1990 US Census data. These \values were calculated by summing
the population and the number of households data for1 each census block located within
each target ring. For census blocks lying only partially within the ring, the per cent area·
of the block within the ring was multiplied by the poJulation and household densities of
the block.
..,,uNfflr l!!!!I -am == == m= • liiiiil liiiiiJ iiiil ----,. -U.S. ENVIRONMEN ROTECTION AGENCY • PAGE 4 OF 8
C LIS 3 .
PRE REMEDIAL REPORT-ALL SITES
SORTED BY STATE AND SITE NAME
N
p DS PA SI SITE ID EPA ID SITE NAME COUNTY CITY SSID L DATE COMPLETE COMPLETE NF RAP DA TE
STATE:NC
0405512 NCD986176469 HARWELL ROAD TCE GASTON GASTONIA 04MH N 11/02/90
0402616 NC0003163888 HENREDON FURNITURE INDS BURKE MORGANTON N 08/01/80 06/13/85 PA001 09/29/92 S1001
0403139 NC0990734055 HERCOFINA NEW HANOVER WILMINGTON-CONFID N 11/01/79 11/01/84 PA001 06/13/90 S1001
0402728 NCD039102959 HEVI-DUTY ELECTRIC CO. WAYNE GOLDSBORO 04HK R 10!02/85 12/24/85 PA001 02/09/87 S1001
0406307 NC00009983'14 HICKORY GROVE ROAD TCE SITE GASTON MCADENVILLE N 12/30/94 02/04197 PA001 02/04/97 S1001
0403006 NCD980557565 HIGH POINT CITY LANDFILL GUILFORD HIGH POINT N 11/01/79 03/01/84 PA001 09/30192 S1001
0405656 NCD986188837 HIGH POINT COAL GAS PLANT GUILFORD HIGHPOINT N 05/16/91 06/29/93 PA001
0406410 NC0001206572 HORSESHOE CREEK ROAD GRANVILLE CREEDMOOR N 09/05/95
0403110 NCD980847123 HURT RESIDENCE BURKE MORGANTON N 09/18/85 05/05/87 PA001 06/30/86 SI001 .. ---I 0403079 NCD980729602 JADCO·HUGHES FACILITY GASTON BELMONT 04G8 F 10/01/79 06/01/80 PA001 06/01/80 SI001 ri /-. 04/18/84 SI002
05/23/84 SI003
0404918 NCD986166163 JENNINGS (DON) PROPERTY PASQUOTANK ELIZABETH CITY N 05/09/88 06/13/90 PA001
0404327 NCD122263825 JFD ELECTRONICS/CHANNEL MASTER GRANVILLE OXFORD 043L F 09/15/86 05/13/87 PA001 06/17/87 SI001
0406186 NC0000195743 JIM.\'IY GREEN METALS NASH NASHVILLE A420 N 04/04/94 09/14/95 PA001 09/14/95 SI001
0404630 NCO115990574 JMC PLATING DAVIDSON LEXINGTON 048X N 09/30/88 03/27/90 PA001 07/23/92 SI001
0402549 NCD000770487 JOHNSON CONTROLS GLOBE BATTERY DIV FORSYTH WINSTON-SALEM N_OB/01/80-08/01/84-PA001-09/29/92-SI001
--0402780-NC0048958615-KELLY~SPRINGFIELD TIRE CO CUMBERLAND FAYETTEVILLE N 08/01/80 02/01/85 PA001 05/04/89 SI001
0403002 NCD980503189 KERNERSVILLE RUBBER DUMP FORSYTH KERNERSVILLE N 10/01/79 10/01/79 PA001 08/01/80 SI001
04/16/86 PA002
0403028 NCD980557805 KERR-MCGEE CHEM CORP BRUNSWICK NAVASSA A425 s 06/01/81 11/01/84 PA001 03/31/89 S1001
0405820 NCD986197366 KINSTON COAL GAS PLANT LENOIR KINSTON N 01/27/92 04/13/93 PA001
0402954 NCD093344133 KOPPERS CO INC MECKLENBURG PAW CREEK N 11/01/79 05/01/84 PA001 10/01/80 SI001
0402647 NCD003200383 KOPPERS CO. INC. {MORRISVILLE PLANl) WAKE MORRISVILLE 0480 F 02/01/80 02/01/85 PA001 06117/80 SIOOt
0406449 NC0001329507 LAKE WYLIE -BROWNS COVE MECKLENBURG CHARLOTTE A412 N 01/24/96
0406601 NCD981863814 LANCASTER PLATING SITE HARNETT LILLINGTON A474 N 11/27/96
0403008 NCO980557581 LEXINGTON MUNI LOFL DAVIDSON LEXINGTON N 06/01/81 05/01/84 PA001 08/13/91 SI001
0402963 NCD097724009 LIGGETT & MYERS TOBACCO CO DURHAM DURHAM N 08/01/80 05/15/86 PA001 09/01/89 Sl001
0402588 NCO001810365 MARTIN-MARIETTA, SOOYECO, INC. MECKLENBURG CHARLOTTE 0467 F 11/01/79 03/01/80 PA001 11/01/84 SI001
0402813 NCD055359079 MASONITE CORP FIBERBOARD DIV NASH SPRING HOPE A426 N 08/01/80 08/01/84 PA001 06/27/91 SI001
0406610 NCO986223170 MCBESS INDUSTRIES GASTON HIGH SHOALS N 01/07/97
0403088 NCD980838551 MCDOWELL FIREMEN ASSOCIATION SITE MCDOWELL MARIONTOWN N 01/01184 10/10/86 PA001 08/01/84 SI001
0405440 NCO986172500 MCLEAN BROTHERS FARM SCOTLAND WAGR.Alv1 04KQ N 04/17/90 09/19/91 PA001 05/08/96 S1001
•
I
'-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
Memorandum
To: File
Date: September 30, 1998
From: Douglas Moore 4 J!L.u-._.,
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
Subj.: POTW Permit
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
US EPA ID: NCO 000 770 487
On Wednesday, September 30, 1998, I spoke with Mrs. Linda McSwain-Randall, lndistrial Waste
Chemist with the city of Winston-Salem (336) 765-013~ about permits issued by Winston-
Salem/Forsyth County publicly owned treatment works (POWW) to the Johnson Controls facility.
Mrs. McSwain confirmed that Johnson Controls was issued i Industrial User permit #1044 by the
city of Winston-Salem. The permit authorizes the facility tb discharge wastewater from the pre-
treatment system and facility sanitary sewer. The permittiJg prog~am did not start until 1979--,
before then it was operated by the individual communities. She stated that the first permit for this
location was issued to Globe Union on October I, 1978 by thJ city of Winston-Salem. The facility
had a sewer use ordinance prior to that.
The facility is authorized to discharge wastestreams originating from the battery wash, laundry,
showers and cooling tower blowdown. The sewer use ordinmice regulates domestic sewer use such
as bathrooms. The current permit places the following limitabons on the facility: Flow (no greater
than 30,000 gallons per day), pH (5.0-10.0), cadmium (no grekter than 0.005 mg/L), chromium (no
greater than 0.03 mg/L), copper (no greater than 0.5 mg/L), Iekd (no greater than 2.3 mg/L-daily, no
greater than 1.08 mg/L -monthly), nickel (0.2 mg/L) and zi1lc (0.8 mg/L).
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
ii
I
I
D
D
Memorandum
To: File
Date: September 30, 1998
From: Douglas Moore 4 ~-------
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
Subj.: POTW Permit
Johnson Controls-Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
US EPA ID: NCO 000 770 487
· On Wednesday, September 30, 1998, I spoke with Mrs. Linda McSwain-Randall, Indistrial Waste
Chemist with the city of Winston-Salem [phone]\ about permits issued by Winston-
Salem/Forsyth County publicly owned treatment works (POTW) to the Johnson Controls facility.
Mrs. McSwain confirmed that Johnson Controls was issued l Industrial User permit #1044 by the
city of Winston-Salem. The permit authorizes the facility t6 discharge wastewater from the pre-
treatment system and facility sanitary sewer. The permittiiig prog~am did not start until 1979--
before then it was operated by the individual communities. s'he stated that the first permit for this
location was issued to Globe Union on October 1, 1978 by the city of Winston-Salem. The facility
had a sewer use ordinance prior to that.
The facility is authorized to discharge wastestreams originating from the battery wash, laundry,
showers and cooling tower blowdown. The sewer use ordinanbe regulates domestic sewer use such ' . as bathrooms. The current permit places the following limitations on the facility: Flow (no greater
than 30,000 gallons per day), pH (5.0-10.0), cadmium (no greater than 0.005 mg/L), chromium (no
greater than 0.03 mg/L), copper (no greater than 0.5 mg/L), lea~ (no greater than 2.3 mg/L-daily, no
greater than 1.08 mg/L -monthly), nickel (0.2 mg/L) and zind (0.8 mg/L).
-----------.-------r-
-T ------
C104839.DAT
Public Water Supply Database Printout (04/25/97)
Johnson Controls -Globe Battery Division
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, NC
US EPA ID, NCD 000 770 487
Latitude, 36/02/30 to 30/11/00 Longitude, 80/05/00 to 80/14/00
:·.('0234010
✓0·234025
WINSTON-SALEM, CITY OF
WALKERTOWN, TOWN OF
C
C
220000
1371
9107278418 SALEM/THOMAS
9105954212 WELL #1 PINEHAL
----
SP 360530.000 801145.000
GP 361035.000 801010.000
.. 0234025 WALKERTOWN, TOWN OF GP 361025.000 801020.000 C 1371 9105954212 WELL #4 JONES
'I
0234025 WALKERTOWN, TOWN OF GP 361040.000 801030.000 c··
·vil234125 GREEN ACRES MOBILE COURT ·GP 360935.000 801030.000 . . -
C 1371 9105954212 WELL #5 SHIRLEY
C 40 WELL #1
0234145 SHABY-GRBVE-'I'P----------e-----C2-3-9r09fr'l-2-fr'/E,-WE-I,u-G P 361045. 000 801355. OOO-OJf,\M 4-~· l<c«l'-5
/0234165 YORKTOWN S/D C 274 8005257990 WINSTON-SALEM PP 360530.000 801145.000
0234182 GRi\.¥S'!'BNB-FBRRES'l'--WA'!'SR-SYS-'I'EM-321)-9.:1,0.6-6.50.81.LWELLS G P 3 60945. 000 800515. 000--o<t/sf,i,. 4-..,; f?c.,i,;,5
0234182 SRAYS'FOIIE FORRDOT-WA'l'-ER-SY-S'!'EM--G 2-0-9-1,06-6-5-0ll-1.'./--WELbS-G P 36094 5. 000 800515. 000..: Ovf-s•C.10 q.,.,,; {?c,J,,v;
0234183 SP!O!CERISB it'l'FBR SYS'FBM C 160 91-06-6-SW±'/-WE-bb--JH G P 360930. 000 800525. 000-o,+s,{c. 4-Vi R,J,~,
0234183 SMGKEMS&--WA'!'SR-S'lsi,EM l.0£.6-5.0.8~2 G P 360930. 000 800521 _-000 -ovkl/. 4 ~•_f{l.1''y;
0234183 SMOKER¼SE--WA'I'.ER--SYS'!'EM C 16-0--!,±l)66-5{}8-1,'7-WGM,-l/4-G P 360930. 000 800528. 000-o,h,'J.. q ~ J..v,
0234182 GRltYSTONE FORREST WA'l'ER SYSTErvt C 320 97 0665087 7 WET T 3 G P 361005. 000 800530. 000 .:_ Oik,fJ._ 1/-\1,-\./'A.d-~t:b
0234189 ~OOD C 213 9:l-0£650817 I/ELL #1 G P 361020. 000. 800540. 000-u•K£1-> ~-: e.,1.,.,
r - -, -cl ..,_. R. o.A.V., ' --.....Jl234-189 K¥NWOOD C 213 91066581)-'H--W!lLL #2 G P 361025. 000 80054 0. 000 -o,~w . ' .
. 0234191 .'\Bil!G'FON S/D C 90-0-0005259):9B°'WfEBH'Ln·EF1#l-'ll----------G-P-36095'7~rno--800557-.600"0v/;i<k </-,...,, Ro;..;u'
0234191 ABil!G'FOII S/D C 900 0005257990 WEbh--#-3-GP 361005.400 800552.100-" ,,
0234191 A.'\JlB_±IINlCG'F'FGON--&f-D-.,..---------e-----~8-0-8-257990 WE-bI,,.....#4-
0 2 3 4 191 A!HNG'FB 9·0-0-8 0 05·2 5-7-9-9B--WE-hL--6-
0234_191
0234444·
-.0234455
0234458
0234460
ABJ:NG'FG N--&/-i.-:,-',---------e-----91l0-8 o e 5 2 5 7 9 9 e 11lfuh4-
MRS_ AVA-PRUIT-r°
UNION CROSS BAPT CH
HOUSE & GROUNDS COMM
FRIEDLAND MORAVIAN CHURCH
N
N
N
N
25 o 9107679815 WELL
32 9107692862 WELL
60 9107089068 WELL
73 9107882652 WELL
Page 1
G p 361007.600 000551. 600 -,,
G p 360937.700 800538 .100 -" G p 360936.400 800539. 700 -,.
G p 360935.000 801220.000
G p 360240.000 800640.000
G p 360445.000 800945.000
G p 360345.000 800950.000
,. I
'' ' "
-.... ------------
C104839.DAT
0234463 CHRIST WESLEYAN CH N 60 9104544630 WELL G p 360250.000 801040.000
0234470 CD SELLS GROCERY N 200 9107692025 WELL G p 360350.000 800735.000
0234470 C D SELLS GROCERY N 200 9107692025 WELL G p 360350.000 800735.000
0234470 C D SELLS GROCERY N 200 9107692025 WELL G p 360350.000 800735.000
0234470 C D SELLS GROCERY N 200 9107692025 WELL G p 360350. 000 800735.000
02344 71 WELCOME DOOR BAPTIST CH N 123 9108896101 WELL G p 361100. 000 800600.000
0234567 BEREAN BAPTIST CHURCH p 75 9107850527 WELL G p 360230.000 801110. 000
0234574 KERNERSVILLE LAKE PARK N 75 9107272946 WELL #1 G p 360910.000 800600.000
Water Supply System: Water Supply Source: ,~-...._
C Community s Surface Water
N Non-Community G Groundwater
p Private
Page 2
; ...... .u• ,..oo 'Cu) f(l l
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY
SPECIAL NOTE
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
DRAFT . ·-·~ .
SVMBOLOGV EXAMPLE
SYSTE.M
I SUBSYSTEM
/__,CLASS
EM2f "-SUB( LASS. WATER REGIME
~OTEt 10 THi= ;;-;;.._.¥"
• -Subsystems, Classti;,_ Subclas,tts, anc' '/J.,1e, Regimes
1n Italics were devo?.:~ped spec1•ically fo1 NATIONAL
WETLANDS INVENTORY mapping
• Some areas des1g1,'.ted as R4SB, R4SBW, OR R4SBJ
{INTERMITTENT SHEAMS) m,iy not meet the defm1•
t1on of wetland.
e This map uses the dass Uncnr:solldalf1d Shore (US)
On earlier NWI ma~ 1hat da~; was designated Beach/
Bar {BB), or Flat (FL) SubclaSses remain the same m both
11er1uons.
l~l3(ffi"' pt
· 36°07'30" ;.1,~,j?'-1'")'
WALKERTOWN, N,C,
0 1 acr• D &ecr•• □ 10actH D,.K, .. □
This document was prepared primanly by suueoscop1c
c1nalys1sol high a1t,1ude aerial pho1ographs Wetlands were
1 len1,t1ed on the photographs based on vegeta11on, v1s1ble
l'lydrology, and geograph'f' ,n accordance w11h Clal&ifa-
tion of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitatl of the United
S11ta1 lfWSIOBS 79131 Oecembe1 1979) The ae11al
photographs typu:ally re11ect cond111ons during 1ha spec,t,c
year and season when 1hey were taken In addI11on, there
15 a margin of error ,nhereni in the use of the aem1I
priotographs Thus, a de1a1led on the ground and h1stoncal
analys1& of a ilngle sue may resull In a revision ot 1he
wellana boundaries e51abhshed 1hrough photographic
m1erpreta1Ion. In add111on, 5ome small we1lands and !hose
obscured by dense 1ot8$1 co1i1er ma',' noc be included on 1h1s
document
UPLAND INON-WETLANDI
$Y5TEM
SU85V$TEM
SYSTEM
SUBSYSTEM
SYSTEM
ACREAGE GUIDE
For 1ntorm .. ion on ■vailab,hty of NWI map•. call 1-800-USA-MAPS. Feder al, S1a1e and local regula1ory agencies wnh 1ur1sd1c-
11on over wetlands mav define and describe we11ands 1n a
d1!teren1 manner than that u58d ,n 1h15 1m1eniorv. There 1s
no anemp1.1n e11her the design or produc1sof1h1s mventory,
lodehnethe hmlll of propuetary 1urn;d1cuon of any federal,
Slate or local gcvernmem or 10 es1ablish the geographical
s-cope of the regula!Of')' programs ot government agencies
Poraon1 intending to engage in 1ctiviU81 involving modi•
ficalion, within or ediacent to wetland areH should aeek
the advice of appropr.ate Federal, Siate or local agencilla
concerning 1,-citied agency regulatory program, and
proprietary jurisdiction• that may affect auch activilie,.
TECHNICAL RESPOl\!SIBILITY
TASK
ZTS
ZTS QC
MAP Pl Qr:
ZTS CORRECTION
CORRECTION CHE CK
F W S ACCEPT
1 -iUBTIDA.L
0.\1[ . ,,,t-,,..5_ pJ
.,,,_ -/5-,.,
.3·.J•1S
M -MARINE
--------------------
2 -INTERTIDAL
... "OC::"-ul UltCOJl'>OtlOAltO All AQUAh.'.: IUD Al KHf ow · Dl'tN WAltR A8 AQUATIC et:o IU AlV ll!i . MOCl.1' 5'1011( US -UNCONSOLIDATE[i RB-· ROCK
SHORE BOTTOM aonou aonOM u,..,.,._.,.,,,.,,..,.. , __ _
··--1(-(,,, ... , ,. ...
'""" • o,,-..-,
·-· )-NV•.._.,,.,
~Ut111>G.-n , __ I ,.:.,..,
)WDOm
-·----··-----·-.---·--·
I -TIDAL 2 -LOWER PERENNIAL
1 "'11•1 1 Coo•I 3 fl_,.., v ... .,.., J Wr><n su,..,.., ..... s-r"'
R -RIVERINE
--··______.__ .• ,-·~ --.
3 -UPPER PERENNIAL 4 -INTEPMITTENT
1 C-G,nel
2 SHw:I 3M~
4 Oru•n.:
5 -UNKNOWN PERENNJAL
• RZUBH
)---------{LINEAR DEEPWATER HABITAT!
Pr1ma11ly represents upland areas. but may include un-
class1f1ed wetlands such as man-modified areas. non photo·
1dent1fiable areas and/or unmtent1onal om1ss1ons.
DATE:
SCALE
TYPE
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
4, ,82
1:58 000
CIR
DATE _. _ _I_
TYPE
E -ESTUARINE
~------------------L---------------·--,
1 -SUBTIDAL 2 -INTERTIDAL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Prepared by National Wetlands lnwentory
B■• map provided by the United States Geological Survey.
SYSTEM
SUBSYSTEM
UB -UNCONSOLIOATEO AB -AQUATIC BEO
BOTTOM
IU -A~H OW •OPEN WA1lftl A8-AOUATIC BED AF-REEi SES·-STAEAMBED RS ROCK'( US-UNCON:iOLIOAlED El\.t -EI\IIEAGENT SS SCAUB·SHfhJB FO-FORESTED CLASS
I Cotible-Gr•wel 2 S•'ld 3Mo4
• 0rf!1n..:
1 Alg,IIL 2 Molh.15<:
J 11001.ci vucui.1 J Worm
4 Floa1•"9 V•s.:ul•• 5 Unlnown SubfrN,,,.n,
I UIMnown s .. ,1.ce
1 -LIMNETIC
una-nawn Baaam
1 Alg•I J /lootl'CI Vn~.,11,
4 FW.11/lll V•1,1;ul11
5 Unbwwn Sullme•~nl. e Un.lm,wn Su,/w:e
L -LACUSTRINE
2 Mollu.-c: l C~e Gravel
3 Wo,m 2 Sand
3M"° 4 o,,.n,c
SHORE SHORE
1 Cobble-G,a~el
4 Sand
3M"" 4 OrQan,c
2 -LITTORAL
I P1m;c,s11rn1
2 Nonpers,~tem
I e,01d-Luv9\J
0!1CldUOl'~
1 N11111!111 l11<1v...:I Dec,dUOl'~
3 8road·l1111vt:O
Ev .. rgreen
4 Naedle-Luvlld
heroreen ,o_
6 0&1du0t,~ 7 £vergre1m
1 a,.,ed·Lened
D11c,duous 2 N&edle-luved 011c,duous
J B1oad·Luwed
EY111green
4 Nn•dle-Leawed
Evero1een
6 Dead
6 Ot1,1duo<,s
7 Cv11rgret:n
SVSTEM
SUBSYSTEM
ClASS
Ill t10C1, ull ullC°""~•OA1tO •:.11 STfllAMlltO A8 AOU,.!IC IUD llS, HOCU US. UIIC0"-S0L1DAlfO • 'EM • EMlflGEIIT OW Ol'E" WAl(R/ un1cno,..., Sanom
118 -ROC.: ue -UNCONSOLIDATED AB -AQUATIC ow·-OPEN WA1[R/ 116-AOC!( ue-UNCONSOLIC,..TED Ml -AQUATIC
UrMni,wn 81111am BOTTOM BOTTOM BED
RS -AOCKV
SHOAE
US UNCONSOLtOATED tM -~M~HGHH
SHORE
OW -OPEN WATFR/
un•nown B11m1m
60f10lol 80f10lol SHOIU SNOftE
• --oc.• ··-·--··-3~c., .... , ..... ..... ,o.,...., 1v....-M
J,\j... 111-o,;O
2Aq-lo<Mol.lo 211..-J 11.oot..:I V •..: JI.ti 4 f-.ng v..., .... ,
!I UM_,, S.-..,i'""'
II UMne•n s.,.,..,.
l c...-Ci, .... 1 , ..... ,_,
"°'~"'"' sv.,.. ... ,.u
·~'"' ....... o ·• ~1..i 1u IIOAI. arod l,.flflMITflNT l,ul£YSU MS •nd 'OfflCI'•-..... on•1 Ct.ASS,., , ... 11'11lKMIT1(fril ::.ua::t'l'S llM
••1wt11.C.U1I _.1-.. lo TIOAI. ~ lOWlll NAlN1114L r...11$YSTlMS
P -PALUSTRINE
Ill 11.oc.. ul -UIICQfllSOLJO.A.TlO "'8-AOUAhCat.O US·•U,.COIISOLIPAllO ML MOSS lM lMEACil'-11 SS· !iCRUBSHAU8 fO FORt:SHO OW-OPf.NwAruv eonOM BOTI()U SHOAE llCHUt u11111,..-,s.,,,_ ,..,..
2&4 ... 1.; ......
)llOOll9dVa..:..i.r ••-...,.v--•-, __
'u-Swt«•
1c...,..<o<e..a1 , ....
3M~
40,_,,c ft ... ...,.,_
'p ...... 1en1
2~••Maf\l
I 8,o.ad Le•..9d
o.c ... -... l NHdl" LN..9d 0,,...,.-
JB,,w,4 LNl'N ,_,,_
•M ..... LN..ed
1-11•-" ,o.~
!!OH..,,_ ,,_,_
1 8t....:I-LH..9d
0.Cod..014
l MNClle lNwed o.c..s..o ... l lrHd•LHwed E.,.,I'""
4 Needle-~•-E-•'"" ·-a°""'""'°"'• ,,_,, .. ,,
BOTTOM BOTTOM RED
1 Hedrodo
2fl~e
• • C D
' ' G
l COOlll••G•-1
2 Sand 3 .....
4 0,1111\0C
I AJ11•1 2 Atluti,, Mor;.,
l Aoor ■d Vucul•• ■ flGJIIIIQ V•w:JI•<
!I UnlcfllJWfl Sub,.,.,-(lflllt 6 Ura _ _, Swl•"
1 Cobble·G,.-..,L
~ Saod 3M_,
4 Orve"c:
I A•g;il
2 A;iu•1,e Moss
J Rooted VaK1<l;i,
4 flo.11'n11 VaKL1la,
S U,'"IU>Q..,,, S"bme1~n1
6 UNno..,n $1111..:r
MODIFIERS
1 Cobl>IB•G••~•I
~ s~nd
J Mud
4 0<\j/ln,c 5 \/"iet;oled
In 01de1 10 more ;,Q,equ.alelw '19LCl,M wl!l■nd and dllllpw11., hc1buali we ur mo,e of 1h11 w•ler ,91;1,m111 ..... 1er chem,,1ry
.o,I. QI' 1,ftK>el mod,t .. ,l m;iy C>lll 1ppl.-:I I! 11W claH or 1_, level '" tn,r.,e,a"hy 1:11 l;trm...:I moc:1,l,er m;iy al,o bl! applied"' lh~ 11colog,cal sy•111m
WATER REGIME WA~'fR CHEMISTRY SOIL
Non-Tidal Tidal CoasUII Hlllinity .nland Sl'linity pH Modifier■ for
l•mp)f•nl• Fiv<ldtld H Perm1nen11, Flooded ' Arf,l,c,.11r f""'1wd •s l<tffll)Olilff t,dal 1 Hyperhehn< all Fresh Water II Organ,c 7H-rsel,n~ s.1 .... ,eo J lnte,m,n..,11, Flooded L S1<bl,CWI •• Se;ii,0t1al-T,dal 2 E11r>11l,n• "e .. 1■1, .. e n Mmera1
S.tlQfltlly FIOOOOII ' "'1,1.,;,•Hv Floo>dad M lrr-a,ule,lw E,cp0$ild ., Sem,pe,mar,11\1-T odal J t,,f,JIQhahn1 8,•d•lh/ :lM111<1$ill,ne a Ac,d
S1nf/lNl/r Floodldt W lm1un,1t..,1ly ~ AeQul .. ly Flooded ·v Perm■nenl Todal 4 l'ulyh11i,l'e 0 FrHh I (,rcumneulral
WriO.•,ntKI floodsdlT 1mpa,rar.-' lrr~ul•rlw Flooded u Unl<110..,,, 5 '-loaohel,nc , Al~al,ne
S,_..,,., F"""14filr' ' Se1..,•1ed.'S.,.,,pe,..,anen1/ 6 01,ooti.hnc
s ...... ~ s.e..,...1 0 Fruh
S.11> tly flooded z ln1.,m,n.,.lly 'ln..H weMr •ev•mn are only ..,,.ci ,n
ln1erm01Wn• y E-"PQMld Ell.J)Hff 'Pe,m,.ner,1 1tdally4nlluenc.t. lrHh ... ;iler S','Slllffl, u u,u,_,.
SPECIAL MODIFIERS
t, Bt:11•e1 h D,•eri/lmpr>unded
d P11rf111/ly Oramt:d/D11cht:d r An,t,c,al Substr;ne
f homed s Sp,;,/
• E•cawated
~
I
L.;, ,,,: /i[•Ju NUl'llllJLH I
j
WINSTON-SALEM WEST, N.C.
8/l ?2'J0" ;,-ono-, .
.,,
;
' • • • ,Ml/· ' -, . ;,,.... .
I ,~ ...
/tfd ·~
':'i.;-'.
;/ ~ ,. ,..:.-:..!
~-.' ·~•~,. ... ,. -~1\ ::.;....•,;.
' fr., : · .. :.,
. . . • --,,e •. ·--== ,,i _,._ ... ... . . . ... ' .
" ,, .. ..:.: • .,. J "'' •.. ~ ... ····=·
• ;.;:..:c,,<;,< •
....
;i,·.,~i. "
o-~ ':7~ 3
WINSTON-SALEM SE
WINSTON-SALEM
SCAL[ I .-a [)'.)J
"'
D.ac, .. D 10t1Cfn
ACREAGE GUIDE
·" ~-.' ··• -. (
For lnto,ma1ion on availability of NWI mapa. call 1-800-USA•MAPS.
M -MARINE
40acrH
IJii,\VVINl, f\;l ,,v\tlU1
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY
UNITEP ST A TES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
~ •~ _,, ;,,1· • ~,-,, ~"r'•D..:"""L~~ 3'I It#/ u'-l•l ,....._L ~=~~~ ~ 7 • !1£,.t I ,,,.,,row,.,.,.J.,., ~-"'~,~·'·'·: :--.-.-, .. ;;;~·'<-=:-::l)d ;· . ~~ '~·\R . • . " · ' .~· ·\'i•\'.\ ~~1,;lf •,, -.~\. ~--... ·
•'---"'" ".:;t.,1; "\ -~-?I • • '• •• ■ ~ ' -tY · ,,· '.;: , t~--·· \~,ii. 1, ,,····••'"' .... \~,~ ·.,: .... ~~~ i,._.._ \ ··: :(;~~~~~~ . ·-:1" • \ : \ '
. . -...... -1, • ....._ •
·-. ... . -. . .
~-.;~-: a ,c?····.
' "(.::.. -
~');-~ _/·-----=-:~ \ · __ 'l_ :
-• ;r::~:,,.,'"",...;r:,-,:• . '.,j_ -~
·: .· '
DRAFT
SPECIAL NOTE
Tfus documenl was prepared primarily by stereoscopic
ilnillys,$of h19h al111ud41 ;umill pho1ographs. Welland5 we1e
ldent1!1ed on lho photograph• bHed on i,,ege1a11on. v,s,ble
hydrology. and geography m accordance w11h CIH~tica-
tion ol Wetland• and Deepwater Habitat• ol the United
StatH lfWS/08S 79/31 December 1979). The aena1
photograph& IYl)tc•llv raflect cond111on1 during 1he i.pec1f1c
year and seas.on when they were tilken In addition, there
,s a n-,a191n of error ,nherem 1n the use of the aerial
pho1ographs. Thus. a de1a1led on the ground and historical
analys:, ot a single sue may result ,n a rev1s1on of the
we1land boundaries estabhshed through pho1ograph1c
1n1erpr111a11on. In add111on, M>me small wellands and those
Obs-cured by dense f0(es1 cover may na1 be included on this
document
Federal. S1110 and local regulatory agenc1e:.w11hiurisd1c-
11on oi,,tr wetlands may dehne and dusc11be w11111land1i m a
d1Herer11 manner then thal used ,n this inventory There ,s
no a11emp1, ine1u,erthedos1gn 01productsof 1h1& in11entory.
10 di!il1r.• lhe l1m11s of prop111uary JUI 1~1c11on of any Federal.
Suma cir local government or 10 estabhsh lhe geographical
?M:Ope of the regula1ory programs ol go11ernment agencies
Persori• intanding to eng•g• in •chvitie• involving modi·
fi1;11Cion• within or adi•cent to wetland area• ahould Meil
the rid\'lce of •ppropria1a federal. State o, local a9encie1
concaming apecif.ed agancy '"ulalo,v program, and
proprtttary jurisdiction• that mey affect •uch activiliH.
SYMBOLOGV EXAMPLE
)
S'i'SlEM
I SUBSYSTEM
/_.,.-CLASS
µEM2f • '<. SUBCLASS WATER REGIME
UPLAND !NDN-WETLANDl
--R2U8H
-----iLINEAk DEE.PWAfE.R HABITAT)
Primarily represents upland areas. bul may include un-
class,h!KI wetlands such as man-mocl1l1edareas. non pho10-
1dentlf1able areas and/or un1ntent1onal om1ss1ons
NOTES TO THE USER
• Subsystems, Cla5oes, Sub-:lasses. end Wate; rieg1mes
in Italics were developed :;;iec1f1cally for NATIONAL
WETLANDS INVENTORY rn.-pp1ng.
• Some areas designated u Fl4SB, A43BW, OR A4SBJ
!INTERMITTENT STREAM_Slmay not meet the def1m-
1ion of wetland.
• This map uses the class U"~onsol1dated Shore (US).
On earlier NWI maps tha1 class was designated Beach/
Bar (BBi, or Flat jFLI Subc1•sses remain the same in both
versions.
DATE:
SCALE:
TYPE·
AERIAL PHO,OGRAPHV
4 1 ,so
1:58 000
CIR
DATE: _ _L__ ___ ...i.~-
SCALE·
TYPE
E -ESTUARINE
i
.
' .
• ...__ \ -
---__:-I •. ,; \_,.;-~,._';;, __ ---·-Golt Cuu
WINSTON-SALEM WEST, N.C.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Prepared by National Wellands Inventory
._....., provided by tha United S1e1ea Geological Surwy.
SYSTEM
SUB&YSlEM 1 -5U8TIDAL 2 -INTERTIDAL 1 -SUBTIOAL 2 -INTERTIDAL SUBSYSTEM
.... ,1.11,l,
5Y&TEM
SIJDSYSTEM
SYSTEM
"I •o..·• wll V"'-.:0,.!oQI.IOATiD M-4QUAl11;1Ui0 H•••ltlU OW-Ol'tlfWAlill, A8-,i.Qu,l.liCBf.0 fl~ -M(ff FIS·-ROCKY SHORE US -UNCONSOLIOATlD RB -R()CK. aonu-W IIOTTOU u,,;,.._ ,.,,.,....,
I Aljj•I I Cor&I
3 R<IOI.O 'i•w;.,i., l Woun • u,.._ s_,.,,,
R-RIVERINE
1 -TIDAL 2 -LOWEii PERENNIAL 3 -UPPER PERENNIAL 4 -INTERMITTENT
Ill HOCC ua UftCGr.SOUOAll0 •y • iH~lN,,I.._O .... -AClUAllC &tD RS -MOCH US -U"6COfilSOL10ATEO
IIOMOM IOTIOM 5-HQflE ~Ollt:
I c--.-G<-,,_ , .... ,o.,.... ·--,,_
)C.-..Caf-,,_ •w~ .0r..,.. ... ·-
1 ~ '8-0dl
2~'"'......., lRwlltllie
]R.-l■CIVl-
4 hr;•••"IIV,nc,.1.,
l""'-iS-~ IV/111-s..n.e
1 CQbtlle G, • .._. , ..... ,w ....
40,~n,c:
6V..-CeiMI
•jJRt.A1,18tO ..,...._..., l10AI. -!1otl11M1TIU1f SUa5YSTEMS. -~-• ... llwuot, CLASS ,n II• INTEAMITI[NT SUBSYSTEM
''l,..ltGt.Jlf •-1e TIO.Ill.-LOWEii N.N.IIMAL SU.SYSTEMS
1111& -ltOC!l
"'"''"
P -PALUSTRINE
U11 -uM.OhSOI.IOAllD Al -AOU4TIC BlO I.Ii · UNCOhlSOlt0ATlO M~ ·· MOSS l'-' aon~ SHORf UCH/:Jii
iMtKl..lNl
Sl10ME BOTTOM
1 COObl■ G•■-2 =>•"II lM_,
• o,91n,c
1 eeo,ou.
2 Ruob11
5 -UNKNOWN PERENNIAL
OW-Ol'[NWATEIII
Unu>ciwn llf/1-
ue -UNCONSOLIDATED A.8 -AQUATIC BEO
BOTTOM
AF-REEF 0W-0PE.NWA1ERI AB-A.OUATICBEO Untna..,n Btmam
RF_ REEF SB -STREAM8EO AS llOCKY \JS-UNCONSOLIDATED EM -EMERGENT SS-SCRUB-SHRUB FO-FORESTED
1 Cobble-G,..,11
2 S1nd
1 A111el ~ MolluloC
3 Roo!ld 1/ni;.,ltr J Worm
3M_,
I 0•11•1Hc
I F~l•flll 'w'•1,1;;ul1r
S VMr>own Sub,',wtg""• 6 Ul'M,,.wn Sutl.u
1 -LIMNETIC
RB -MDCII. ue -UNCONSOLIOATEO AS -AOUAHC
BOTTOM BOTTOM BED
lC-•G1r, .. l S•nd ]M_, • o,aa,..c
lAl~I 2 Aqua1tc Uoss
3 Rooted 'w'•seuia, 4 Fio.1,ng 1,1.,ieular
5 Unl.1111•11 Sul>nwt,r,,,-.,
6 lh'M:nown Sutl.K■
1 Al11a1 2 Mollu!oe
J Root Id 'w'a,i.cutar J worm 4 Flo.11,011 1/u,:ula,
S U~nown SulJmftt~ 6 Un,tnown Sutt.Ka
L -LACUSTRINE
I C,:oble-Gr•vel """ 3M<
• Oit"n<e
S~RE SHORE
I Beo,oc;~
2 RubDle
I Cobble-G,.vel
2 Send
J Mud
4 Or11•n•c
2-LITTORAL
OW -Ol'tN INAIEH-RS-ROCK UB -UNCONSOLIDATED AB -AQUArtC RS -ROCKY SHORE Vn.t11p...-118PllfJf't! BOTTOM BOTTOM. BED
1 Bedrock 2Rubtlle I Cobbl&·Gri'11tl 2 Send :I Mud 4 Orv.in,i:
1 Algal 1 Bed,ock
2 Aqu111c Moos 2 llu~
3 Rooced Va1,e~l1r • fkwt10\I V,,s.cul.,,
~ Un.lnown S~g.nt
6 Unl.nown /iurl~•
MODIFl£RS
l Pers,sienl
1 Nonpe1si5lent
l B<oad-LHved Dec,duous
l N-■<ll••LHveo:l
Oec,duoos
3 Broad l1Nmtd
, l:ver11n1•n
4 N9edle-Leevlld Ev1rg1Hn
50..d B Docldua..s
1 [v.,,fP'""
US UNCONSOLL□ATEO U.A EMERGENT SHORE
I C00ble-Gr.avel
2 Sa~d
3M"" 4 Org;1n,c
S Vege1a1ed
2 Nonpe1s,~1ent
In n11ier to mnre ..i.qu.itely deo,:r,l)e -•lllnd 11nd ~pwaw, hat>1~vs °"" or mora ol 11\e WM1tr reg,m• . ..,..,.,, d1tm11~11y
Ii-OIi. or &?Kial mod,f,0,1 m1-,-be ■?Plied 111he d•u;"' i.-, '"""' m tfta t,,e,,.r,l>y The farmeo mOOll,u may .. 1.., be -lied kl th11 oo:tk>111c111 system
1 Broad-Leaved
Decaduous 2 Needl1t•L@aved Oec:idua,n
J 9roa<I-Luv8d
he111,_,
4 Maedle•LH-...d E.,.,9,Hn , ....
6~C•d!IOIIS 7 [,,,,,fl{.tm
OW -OPEN WA rER/
U11/mown Bow,m
WATER REGIME I 'NATER CHEMISTRY I SOIL I SPECIAL MODIFIERS
I ' Non-Tidal T'..1-1
ClASS
Sub(;lnss
SYSTEM
SUBSYSTEM
cuss
Sullelass
'',i
o.L _ I .....1,_ l __ L. __ ~-hl'~·
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
WINSTON-SALEM EAST, N.C.
'so0 15'
36°07'30'''
•
..,,
2'30"
.-_ ,~---·
•• ,.
t ~/
: ~
WINSTON-SALEM
SCALE I 24000 SPECIAL NOTE
JOC() ,cm '"" 1000 r[I ~
, ,, • ,_>0,<1, ·. • •,:s;:,-· • •
. ~ -~ .~ ... ___ .... . . -~ •, " . .
DRAFT
SVMBOLOGY EXAMPLE
SYS HM
I SUBSYSTE:M
/ 0 • CLASS
~EM2F / '<. SUBCLASS WAHR REGIMf
.: ·-.
\ ·.P, ,•·
. . .,. ~ ',.
. ' -;,•·· . ......-. ... ~. ~ .
• ' I ~-. ·t •• •
... ~·••.!~• .
NOTES TO TH,: USER
..
. •! ' ·, ..... . :-.·-· .,
• Su•.,~ttJms. r:1111,ses, Subcll!l.-,s. and Watef R19,m-.1
,n ltaf,cs we~~ 1ft\"el00fld ,oec1f1c:111y for NATIONAL
WETLANDS IWENTOAV mapp,ng
• Some etallS ~s1ona1N111!1 R4SB. R4S8W. OR R4S8J
(INTERMITTENT STREAMS) mav not mnt the d8P,n1
110n ol we11,~a
• This map uns th■ clan Unconsohdeted Shore (US)
WINSTON-SALEM EAST, NC.
....
"'"
0 1 acre D Sacres D 10aeres D 20ac,eo □ 40 8Cfl?!":
Tti1s documFir1t was prepared primarily by s1Neoscoi:,1c
analys,sol t,1gh altitude aerial pli,;:itograplis. Wetle.nd9 were
identified on the photogr&phs based on lf1!91tl8t1cn, \/'1S1ble
liy(ttology, and geography in accordance w11h Cluslflca-
tion of Wetlands and DeepwatM Habitats of the Unitltd
SlltH [FWS/08S -79/31 December 19791. The aerial
photographs typically refl~t conditions during the spec,hc
year and season when they were 1aken. In addit1on. !Mere
1s a mBrgm of error mlierenl in the use of lhe aerial
photographs. Thus. 11 det111led on the ground .11nd hislorK:al
analysis of a single site may result in II rev1S1on of the
wetland boundaries established through photographic
interpretation. In addition. some small wetlands and those
obscured by dense forest cover m.11y not be included on thi!i
document.
UPLAND !NON-WfTlAN01
On 111rller NW1 map'-tMat clus wu Ms,gnatfl'd Beach/
Bar lBB). or Flat !Fl) Subc:lasHs r~ma,n tPle same 1n both
1teriuons
SYSTEM
SUBSYSTEM
CLASS
Subdass
SYSTEM
SUBSYSTEM
CLASS
SYSTEM
CLASS
Subd/t'-5
•,I
ACREAGE GUIDE
For information on availability of NWI maps. call 1-800-USA-MAPS.
M-MARINE
1 -· SUBTIDAL
Federal, State and local regulatory agenc,e!i with jur1sd1c•
hon over wetlands may define end describe wetlands in a
d,fferenl manner than that used in this inventory. There is
no attempt. in either the design or products of 1h;s inventory,
to define the limits of proprietafy jurisdiction of any Federal,
Slate or local government or to establish the geographical
scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies
Persons int1tnding tn engage in activities involving modi-
fications within or adjacent to wetland area, should leek
the advice of appropriate Feder.111. State or local agencies
eoneeming specified agency regulatory RJogram1 and
proprietary jurisdictions that m.11v affect such ■ctivi1i••·
2. -INTERTIDAL
~8 -ROCK UB --UNCONSOLIDATED AB -AQUATIC BED RF . REH ow~ on:NWA rl.R, AB -AQUATIC BED
BOTTOM ROTT0\11 Un*"""'" 8.,rr,,m
RF REH RS -ROC.::Y SMORf US -UNCON~OI IDArED
SHOR[
RB -ROCK
80TTOM
I Bedrock
2 Rubble
1 Cobble-Grn~I
2 Sar,d
3 Mud
4 Or~an,c
1 -TIDAL
1 Alg~I 1 Cor~,
3 Rooted Vascular 3 Wo,m
5 U""'nown Su~m~,g~nl
2 -LOWER PERENNIAL
I AIIJAI 1 Corn!
J Roo!ed v11,~1,111, 3 Worm
5 Unknown Subme•~"'
R -RIVERINE
3 -UPPER PERENNIAL 4 -INTERMITTENT
I Cobbt" c;,...,,.1
2 See.d
'""" 4 o,,,,.,c
1 Bfldrock 2 R1,1bbl11
5 -UNKNOWN PEFIENNIAL
. -----R2UBH 1 -!LINEAR DEEPWATER HABITAT!
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
Prepared by N■~ W•t1fflth lnven1Gf"¥
llateffllPPf'OJlf 1-,YIMUl'lltedltatMClado9iealS.,,..,.
Primarily represents upland areas. bu! may include un
classified wedands such as man• mocl,f1ed areas. non photo.
ident,fiRble ere.u lll'ld/or un1ntl'lnt1onal om,u,ons
DATE . 't.L.._ . .1 _82
SCALE _ 1:58 000 _
CIR TYPE ---·-----·
E -EST\JAAINE
1 -SUBTIDAL
LIB -UNCONSDLIOAT(O AB -AQUATIC 8£0 l'lf -REEF OW-Of'fNWII. tfR, .. AQUA TIC M 0 " IIHF
aOTTQtvl u,..,,,,....,9,,,,.,,.,
I C<>hht~ Gt•nl I A1g•I i Mollu" 1 "1911 ·y~,, ...
2 S•i,d J POOlll'd IIHCUl'1 JWo,m 3 l'loo1MI Vncul•• ·-· 3 M1,1d & F1o■ 1,ng V1,c:ular & ~ l""h"t \/'1~ular
& 0,911n1~ 5 un,1-....,_, S""'-•v,mt 5 u,.,,,,_ s~,...,
ft Uninown Surl•.-.. e unt-surlac•
L -LACUSTRINE
1 -LIMNETIC
DATE
SCALE
TYPE
sa -!UUAMllfD
I C..t,hl,, (l,._i ,,..,
, M_, • o,, .....
_j
2 -INTERTIDAL
"' .. AO(l(Y
~NORf
US -\11'fCOH'SOllOATED IM -(l.lfl'IGHIT SS -SC•IA, ~ JO -J0'"1T10
!l.H0",
I "-d,nr• ,,_ ,rot,t,1o,r,,...., , .... , . .,
.o, .... ..,
2 -LITTOAAl
,.,_..l__, .,_......,
JN.-l......r -:11•0-l.....:I ,:.:r:r..-·-·-,_ ,,,.,_ ,,_
1 .... l ........ ... -..
J---l~ -)e,wct\....i ·--·-l-,_.,_ ..... ·--11-.-
SVBTt~
SUSSYST!M
SYSTEM
SUBSYSTEM
RB -ROCK UB -UNCONSOLIOIHEO "SB -STREAMBEO AB -AQUATIC BEO RS -ROCKY us -ui.cONSOLIDAT[D • •EM -l'MERGENT OW-Of'ENWATEffl
Un.1-r,r,wn Rnnnm RB -ROCI(. UB -UNCONSOLIDATED AR -AQU.I.TIC OW~ Ol'ENWII.TlR RB --l'IOCIC ue -UIICONSOllO"TEO •• --AOUAnt " -l'IO(ICT US ~ IJIIIICOltSOllO■.TfO l .,_ -· f.,_l ltGI lj1
BOTTOM BOTTOM SHORE SHORE
1 Bedrock
2 Rubb!@
1 Ccbble-Gr11vet
2 Sand
J M11d
4 O,(lar,c
1 8edroc1<
2 R1,1bble
J Cobbl•-Gr11"l!I 4 Send
!i Mud
6 Orgar,e
7Vt-i,Mat!ld
1 Atgal 1 Bedrock
2 AqullllC MO!IS 2 R1,1bblP
3 Ron1f!d ..,ascul■• 4 Floai,n-g v,n.t:1,11!<
5 Unfoo,..,. Subme,~nt
6 Unknown Surf,.c,,•
1 Cobble-G,.Yel
2 s~oo
'""' 4 Org•n•c
5 V@11"'8Ud
"STf>[AMBED o$ lim,11od !O TIOAL and INTERMml'NT SUBSYSTEMS. ar,d comC,t,ffSlhe only Cl.ASS ,n 1r,e INTERMITTfN1 SUBSYSTEM
""EMfRGHIT,. lim11...i 10 TIOAl and lOWEA PERENNIAL SUBSYSlEMS
P -PALUSTRINE
,· ----~-------~------~-----~
RB_ ROCK UB-UNCONSOLIOAlEcD !'18 -AQUATIC BED US -UNCONSOLIOATfO ML -MOSS· EM -EMERGHH SS SCRUB SHRUB FO -FORESTED OW-Ol'EN WArFFl1
eOffOM BOTTOM SHQR[ LICHEN UMttowri 80111,m
1 Bedrock
2 Rubbl•
'',
1 Cobble-Gr!Mll
2 Sllnd
'""" 4Qri,M>IC
1 Atgal
2 AQ1,11!1'C Mo$,
J Aoolfld V•-cul••
4 flo1tt,ng Vp5c11I••
"i //11~1'nwn
5vl!m~,g~,.,
6 Unlnnwn Sud/le"'
l Col!ble-G<ll,,,.I
2 Sand
3 M111I 4 O•~n,c 'i VPg~Ml.,,1
I P!!<s,,1.,,.,
2 Nonpo,.,~1"nt
1 BtNd le~
O&e1d.-..•
2 N"""I• LU'l'l'IC1 D&e,d.-..,
3 flrnM!-le■v.d
hergrffn
4 Nll9Cll••LHWII (w,rgrnr, , ....
6 Ott,dU/711:l
1E .. ~r,r--n
lBr~-lU,_
0.-e.duoul
1 N..-rlle Lu...,
Oei;.duou•
3 l'r"""1·(■-v"'1
£wergrttn
4 Needle-t.a....t
fw,rgrltt!'n
lOHd
60#c~S
1Ew,-vrttn
BOTTOM BOTTOM '" I Botdrock I Cobbl~-G,.,..1 1 A!oal
2 R1,1bbl• 2 S■"II 2 AquRIOC '-'o. ..
'""" J ROOI~ \lasi:ul1r
• 0r!Jl"'•t & FloahnigV.scul•r
S Vn.1-no,wr S.,,,,._fW!l ft v .......... n s ... ,.~,,
Ur>lno.,,,, 6om,,., BOTTOM eono,-,i 110
1 B""'od , , ............ ·-2 Rutt,,■ , ..... JAquei,r: .....
J ""' J Roototd VffC'III•
• °'9-n1< , ... ,,..v .........
'""'-s ....... ,,..., fl u..t-$url••
MODIFIERS
,_
, ...... ,._ SHOO(
1ColllHC•r,■,t , ..... , ... ·--1v...,....i
'"~IO_,,. Ml!'<Wa1.,1~°"4:r""'-'tftd M-.-ai .. hit,!"'' -o, ,_. l!ft ... _., ,eg,_ -,_,.
...t .,.. _.,.1 modrl-• "'""'"' •Pf>I-"' ,..,. i:len,,. ._._, .,. --...:tty ,._ ,.,~ ..,...,,_ mn...,h■ ■c,pl,..fto '"""""""'O<"'•---
WATER REGIME WATER CHEMISTRY SOIL
Non-Tidal Tidal CDanalHallnhv Inland S•llnrty pH Moditierl for
• Temoo,.,,tv ,10t>ded H P.,m.11,.,.,.lly Floor;lpd ' ,A,t,1,c...,,~ 'S f•moo,e,y T,del I,._,...,_ ■11 Fresh Watfl ,o,_ • S•tur.if'd J tnl■-'"''""'""ly F'-"'"I ' !Sut!f>d■I ., S.--■ll,del 1 """"-·-1 'u"•'•"" 111no11, ... .. .,._,_.,
C SHac,n1lly ,1""""'4 ' At11l~••II~ F1""""'1 " 111..,ut.,1y hr,oNCI •t ~""'•l'l•m•""'1 I ,dtl I ~.,,,,..1, ... 1••N'J•fA1 . .,.,__._ ,.,.
D s ......... ,,., ,,.,.,,,,...,, W lrtt11,..me,.,1y • "__,_, •• ,.,,loooo,d 'V _m_,.,.,,, 1,dat 4~ ........ 0 ,,-.ti ·~~· w""°'.-F!oodl,dfll'1""1)<l<•'"'I • l<!P9ul•<'V !'l"""-d u u,.i,......., ~11..-...1, ... , ......
I ~-"""·"" /1tt..,;,,(I ' §11, .. 11..t ~ ..... t-, ......... 1 fl)','111,!,■1,..,. Satu,•rN S•■-•l a•,.,..,.
' S.m,_..........,,,. floodotd 1 1rn.,m ,,_,,. •r...._ ,...,.., ,..,,..,.. •• -"' ..,.a,:1 "' G tnr..,n,otl•n••v 1 ■f'l"'M'O'l ,.~~ ......... , ,.,..11., ,.,11, ..... , ... ,,.,~-... ,.,,u.,...
u ,,,..,.,, .. ,,
SPECIAL MODIFIERS
···-..... .. ,,_..., r,,,.-,1 Otl'tl'w ,.,,......._.__ ', .. _ ..... . ..........
.. 'l